HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2004-00585 Geotechnical Report •
ALK CONSULTANTS, LL .
AA:
' Environmental Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering • Wetland Consulting
March 15, 2005 ACL-05-02-G015
Page No. 1
Mr. Ray Culver
30 Riverdale Drive
Quilcene, Washington 98376
GEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
JEFFERSON COUNTY PARCEL#'S 950-200-625 AND 950-200-626
SOUTH BEACH PARCEL
JEFFERSON COUNTY,WASHINGTON
This geological report presents the results of a soil and slope assessment directed at evaluating suitability
for proposed development at the above referenced site. The scope of this study was developed during our
initial site visit on February 3, 2005 and outlined in our proposal to you dated February 23, 2005. The
services performed under this authorization were in general compliance with geotechnical report
requirements outlined in the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC), section 3.6.10g.
Additional fieldwork for this study was undertaken on February 26,2005 and March 1,2005.
Site Description
The site is located on a primitive road extending off of South Beach Drive as shown on the Vicinity Map,
Figure 1. At the time of the site visit building pads for the garage and house had been graded. The
subject parcel is bordered by vacant lots to the north and south, a steep ascending slope to the west, and
single-family residences with the Hood Canal beyond to the east.
Proposed Development
Based on our discussions, we understand that the proposed development is to consist of the construction
of a wood frame residential structure and garage approximately 30 feet from the toe of the slope to the
west. The pads for the proposed buildings were observed at the time of our site visits. It is
anticipated/recommended that remaining general site grading for development will be minimal and all
disturbed or bare ground areas will be landscaped and/or re-vegetated following construction.
Methodology
The subject property soil and slope conditions were visually examined and evaluated using available
slope exposures in the site vicinity and the site slope itself. This information provided a basis for a
general understanding of the local soil and geologic conditions as discussed below. In addition to the
9465 Provost Road NW, Suite 2046 • Silverdale, Washington 98383 • (360) 613-2407 • Fax:
(360) 613-2408
05-02-0015 South Beach Para!
• ACL05-02-G015
Page No. 2
•
March 15, 2005
observation of available soil exposures and reconnaissance of the area the following readily available
resources were reviewed.
Resources used:
• "Soil Survey of Jefferson County Washington",United States Department of Agriculture, 1975.
• "Geologic Map of Washington—Northwest Quadrant", Washington State Department of Natural
Resources,Division of Geology and Earth Resources, GM—50,2002.
• "Geologic Map of East-Central Jefferson County, Washington",R.U. Birdseye, 1976.
• U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute series topographic map"Lofall", Washington Quadrangle".
• "Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington",Volume 11,Jefferson County, Washington Department of
Ecology, 1979.
Geologic Setting
The subject site lies within the central Puget Lowland. The lowland is part of a regional north-south
trending trough that extends from southwestern British Columbia to near Eugene, Oregon. North of
Olympia, Washington,this lowland is glacially carved with a depositional and erosional history including
at least four separate glacial advance/retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded on the west by the Olympic
Mountains and on the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial
sediments consisting of interbedded gravel, sand, silt,till,and peat lenses.
The Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resource (WDGER), Geologic Map of Washington —
Northwest Quadrant, dated 2002, indicates that the site is mapped as undifferentiated surficial deposits
uc nearglacial till(Qgt). Undiff
erentiated) surficial deposits consist of clay, silt, gravel,till,and peat.
The term undifferentiated is used because steep slopes preclude differentiation at the map scale. Glacial
till consists of an unsorted, unstratified, highly compacted mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel and boulders
deposited by glacial ice.
The Geologic Map of East-Central Jefferson County, Washington indicated that the site is mapped as pre-
Vashon stratified sediments with beach deposits along the shoreline.
The USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975, indicates
the soils of the site are mapped as Cassolary soil with 0 to 15 and 30 to 50 percent slopes originating in
reworked glacial and marine sediments. Permeability is moderately slow, runoff is slow, the erosion
hazard is slight to moderate, and building limitation for dwellings without basements is moderate for 0 to
15 percent slopes. Runoff is rapid, the erosion hazard is severe, and the building limitation for dwellings
without basements is severe for 30 to 50 percent slopes (more specifically, slopes greater than 15
percent).
Alkai Consultants
• • ACL05-02-G015
• Page No. 3
March 15,2005
Surface and Subsurface Conditions
The site slopes upward toward the west. Building pads have been graded in the eastern portion of the site
for a house and garage, a fish pond approximately 4 feet deep is located uphill from the building pads,
and an existing storage structure occupies the central area of the site as illustrated on Figure 2, Slope
Profile. Existing shallow excavations on the property were observed. Vegetation consists mostly of grass
on the east side of the site with swordfern and brush such as salal on the slope area to the west. There are
a few mature maple trees throughout the site. No evidence of surficial or deep-seated or rotational
landsliding was observed on the property.
Based on observed soil exposures and surficial observations,the native soils are relatively firm/dense at
shallow depths(approximately 2 to 3 feet)and fine grained soils. The building pads may have some
small areas of fill toward the west(downhill)sides of the pads due to grading. The upper 2 to 3 feet of
soil over most of the parcel appeared to be moist to wet at the time of our site visits,except for under the
existing storage building where the soils were more dry.
Based on the soils exposed on and around the property it is our opinion that the site soil conditions are
generally consistent with those shown on the geologic and SCS maps of the area. Generally differences
between the geologic and soil maps and observed soil conditions occur as a result of mapping scale,
availability of exposures,and intended map usage. These differences are generally minor and not
unexpected.
The "Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington", Volume 11, Jefferson County, Washington Department of
Ecology, 1979 identifies slopes in the site vicinity as stable (S) in the lower portion to the east, unstable
(U) in the slope area to the west, and Modified(M) in the flat area near the shoreline. An area described
as Unstable Recent Slide (Urs) is located to the south of the subject site. Stable slopes are generally less
than 15 percent but can include areas of steeper slopes that are stable due to low groundwater
concentration or competent bedrock. The stable slope designation also includes areas underlain by weak
material such as peat, which are stable because they have no significant slope. Unstable refers to slopes
that are considered unstable due to factors such as steepness, groundwater or erosion concerns. Modified
slopes include areas that have been highly impacted by human activities such as excavation and fill and
performance can be difficult to predict. Unstable recent landslide includes areas of recent or historically
active slides. It should be noted that the mapping was performed in the late 1970's and does not reflect
more recent activity.
There was no visible evidence of ground water, springs or seeps observed on the slope face or within
1000 feet of the subject site at the time of the site visit. Our reconnaissance off the subject site was
limited by private property access. Water seepage could occur during periods of heavy rainfall. It should
Alkai Consultants
•
• • ACL05-02-G015
Page No. 4
March 15, 2005
be noted that the pond located on the property is man made and did not appear to be spring fed at the time
of the site visits.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The proposed building footprint appears to be feasible for the proposed development as long as the
foundation walls are adequately designed to retain the cut area where the garage and house are joined and
the footings bear on firm native soil. It may be necessary to deepen footings in order to bear on firm
native soil. Footing drains are also recommended. The house site will be approximately 30 horizontal
feet from slopes greater than 15 percent (at the fish pond area) and approximately 120 horizontal feet
from slopes greater than 30 percent. The shed structure does not appear to be designed as a permanent or
dwelling structure. It is located on a slope with approximately 27% slope and approximately 25
horizontal feet from slopes greater than 30 percent. As previously stated, surficial soils around the shed
appeared to be saturated, but the soils under the shed appeared to be more dry suggesting that the surfical
moisture does not migrate quickly through the soil.
We recommend that roof drains for any structure be tightlined to the toe of the slope near the primitive
roadway and an energy dissipater such as quarry spalls be utilized to reduce erosion. Vegetation should
be maintained as currently established outside the building and driveway areas. In our opinion,
maintaining vegetation on the steeper slopes will help maintain to the stability of the moist to wet surface
soils which are underlain by more firm fine grained soil.
At the time of this letter report no building plans were available for review. It is recommended that a
representative of Alkai view building plans prior to construction and also the excavated footings to verify
that the building is bearing on firm native soil.
REPORT LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Ray Culver and his agents for use in planning
of the referenced development. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on our
interpretation of site conditions, as they presently exist, anticipated future construction activities, and the
expectation that the exploratory efforts adequately define the subsurface conditions across the site. The
soil conditions described in this report and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
are provided for this specific site only and should not be expanded for use on adjacent properties without
additional exploration and review of those sites by our firm. The data and report should be provided to
prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes, but the report conclusions and
interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. There are possible
variations in subsurface conditions. In the event that the scope or location of the project should change or
subsurface conditions different from those encountered during this study be observed or suspected, we
Alkai Consultants
S • ACL05-02-G015
Page No. 5
March 15, 2005
should be advised. At that time a review of the changed conditions will be made, and alternative or
remedial recommendations given as required.
NOTE: We have not explored subsurface conditions as part of this study, nor have we evaluated the site
for the potential presence of contaminated soil, and have not evaluated or addressed ground water
conditions or concerns except as noted in this report. The evaluation of possible environmental or geo-
environmental considerations is beyond the scope of this report.
The owner and the contractor should make themselves aware of and become familiar with applicable
local, state, and federal safety regulations, including current OSHA excavation and trench safety
standards. Construction site safety generally is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The contractor
shall also be solely responsible for the means, method, techniques, sequences, and operations of
construction operations. The firm, Alkai Consultants, LLC is providing the preceding information and
recommendations solely as a service to Mr. Ray Culver. Under no circumstances should the provision of
this information or recommendations be construed to mean that the firm Alkai Consultants, LLC (or
subcontractors) are assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such
responsibility is not implied and should not be inferred.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget for this work, it is warranted that the work has been
done in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this is report was
made. No other warranty,expressed or implied is made.
Should you have any questions or concerns, which have not been addressed, or if we may be of additional
assistance,please call our office at(360) 613-2407.
Sincerely,
oq Washy
David Hurum, L.G. , 'i) *
Senior Staff Geologist
•
e,,s�d Ge°
DAVID C. HURUM-
g i
Alkai Consultants
! •
J r;., •( I - 1 ` • . il‘. 1\, • I `
•
:i f II i r .141 \`" ,. \` f - ,IY\a ! I 1 iI1'111) r _ -
„ ' •'h• Ali j� ' ' - a� , ``- � ._ \ I �,jT, \•ic4, 11j ( :, , ,
SMIre 1..4 i I l� r ,s\ ` •,..: x�`'3`-�, I '- •>` � kt 11 t' rr
.Shin .,!I c ult' :if;e'' I C V:\ !, 1' ti11It ' —_ tI " lilt 111 J/f
•
'� 1 1 Ir'��'.'�r'!4 4 �^ Nfis ti,4 j '`.,�,4, ``,` y�\ �{ " ,� �l+: f}'r � r 7
lj:h /r. i y '' �tr St ''.J f! i:. 11 ,; rlyY.ir/. 1
i .I Jf r I. j ' f y— ..�i -t- 1. tfir r r r -
•' I 1 r- 1 1 ! 1, • •4 'I `4 i 1 . of +•
I I�r / 5
1 j ' 1l•. y. �• •, l + r n /
j I / :, t^�`C r fl r -t� �f
ll
tXl al i r /' � - 4 1'• , I / / i 1 tyf\•` ., 1 + . r t _
I i �. (:';/
r / 4 . 1 E { t r -
I, r./; ' /!+ •. t .'iii
(� j ii'( �t�. ~-N_� '1 jr. j
�r (/ ti 1 i' i l( ,r , 1. •
,1.
rI� /, `�/ /F +!1 j •1 ` I ' �I I,i tfi` !!i Y ! i
1 ll;�r/:. S
,'..../, ' 'I~'t 1 'ci -�,r'J 11 . % 1 k ." ,/ i ' 1 '�I.',',„1 14 _•,,..,80t th porn} .t?
_ ,r •` r % i I . / 1 ` / ii , / 1 `S �rr�/
t r r' 1 �'" 1 � f:" • i t4
j- (�11 f �i/, r i / r 1 t `4t �,i SITE ,
} • 1 r r
f�I r
1 1r ' '
•
r ( • J /
lk f-x,- ,''„r) J.1� i )ir'/1. r 1 •
rl ( r
a�r .,/ 9. r' - 1;
, If• f r +. ril I,,` -%; f 4\
Figure adapted from TopoZone.com
FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP
Project Name: South Beach Parcel Z,
ALKAI CONSULTANTS, LLC. Location: Jefferson County,Washington N
Project No.: ACL-05-02-G014
Environmental Engineering• Geotechnical Engineering-Wetland Consulting Client: Mr. Ray Culver
Date: 2/25/05
lig ,-,1
cra•
Et
X CD
CD
M > a
ro
�h
oa▪ O •
z sa. .
m VI co
9. C o
n Ii
m ID• J r"e p
I
m
•
N
vc» rU 2 P
.,
A, _ ao I
CD
N n
p 3 AD (I) CD
n
u+ � rc� m o H r
'fvG G �; .. 4) .� C <
Cy Cl) �
C OO o c =f r+ .r
C W ,~•h a o
* -U P \ CA tr.', cl? ''Ci
1-1 i n cn nw o �. b
CD M
CO u
w t--,
= CDCrl
• CD r
CD
a O
ij
c)
z
O
H
I
a .4
P
Cfq
CD
/
II
. \ xro
O �.
a .
CD
0