HomeMy WebLinkAbout107.Helm, F. 4-21_Washington Department of Ecology
Michelle McConnell
From:HELM [jhjelm1042@intergate.com]
Sent:Wednesday, April 21, 2010 7:38 PM
To:Stewart, Jeff R. (ECY)
Subject:Washington Department of Ecology
Attachments:Washington Department of Ecology.docx
Categories:LASMP Public Comment
1
Washington Department of Ecology April 21, 2010
P.O. Box 47775
Olympia, WA 98504-7775
Re: SMP Jefferson County
To Whom It May Concern:
Enclosed are my comments relative to reviewing the revised guidelines you wish to promulgate and
adopt:
I can cogently respond that these revisions far exceed any needed changes to the existing SMP.
It should be pointed out that NO property owners have been included in the drafting of these new
guidelines. It would appear that they have been purposefully excluded, yet they are the one group most
affected by these proposals. Why?? Do they not pay most of the taxes and fees?
Calculations for setbacks are of vital concern for all. This harkens back to issues raised above. Why do
NEW global programmed requirements appear when undeveloped areas are not the norm? The vast
majority of existing sites conform, why go thru all this effort then other than to sustain a bloated
autocracy.
I maintain that a little sanity and common sense will do more than the dictatorial rants in the revised
SMP.
Please circulate my comments to all other respondents on this matter.
Sincerely,
Frederic C. Helm
P.O.B. 418, Brinnon, WA 98320