The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutExhibit 26-01 Pre-application meetingPRE19-00039 Pre -Application Conference Point Whitney Boat Launch Expansion County Attendees: Shannen Cartmel, Assistant Planner— DCD; Linda Paralez, Planning and Building Manager= DCD, Patty Charnas, Director - DCD Other Agency Attendees: Bridget Kaminski -Richardson — DNR; Darrin Masters — WDFW; Rebecca Rothwell — ECY (via phone); Daisy Douglass —Army Corps (via phone). Time and Date: December 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM Applicant/Representative: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; Representative: Chris Gourley Site Location: Parcel number 601071001; 1000 Point Whitney Road, Brinnon, WA 98320. Description of Proposal: Expansion of current boat launch. The existing boat launch will be left in place while new planks and an articulated concrete mat will be placed along the same alignment at an elevation that may meet but not exceed the beach elevation. The ramp is being raised to improve safety and reduce impacts on beach substrates in the area. The total footprint will be 1056 square feet with an increase of about 136 square feet above mean higher high water(MHHW) and 920 square feet below MHHW. Mitigation for the work will include removal of two piles within the lagoon area and the grading to the west end of the "point" to match the grade of the beach. The Jefferson County Code is available on-line at: http://www.codepubI1shing.cam/WA/JeffersonCountvl Planning and Building Division — Shannen Cartmel — (360) 379-4454 Land Use: Zoned Parks, Preserves, and Recreation (PPR) WDFW is lead agency for SEPA review. Critical Areas: Unstable Shoreline Slope, Slight Landslide Hazard, Critical Aquifer Recharge Area, Coastal SIPZ, FEMA Flood Zone AE, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Shoreline Master Plan: Shoreline Designation: Conservancy above Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), Aquatic Below Ordinary High Water Mark • Application must comply with Jefferson County Code (JCC) Chapter 18.25- Shoreline Master Plan (SMP) Under the SMP1: o Shoreline Conditional Administrative Use permit (C(a)), required for nonresidential/public boat launches (JCC Table 18.25.220) and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required for project. o Project will be processed as a Type III permit with final decision made by Jefferson County Hearing Examiner for the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. The Conditional use permit will be approved administratively for conditional approval by the County and Final approval by Department of Ecology (ECY). The two processes (Shoreline Conditional Use/Shoreline Substantial Development Permit) will be processed together. o Both processes require 30-day Notice of Application public comment period. o The shoreline substantial development permit Notice of Hearing and Staff Report will be required to be noticed 14 days prior to the hearing. o Jefferson County has received a Biological Assessment, prepared by KPFF, which includes mitigation and will meet the requirement to submit a No -Net Loss of Shoreline Functions Report and Mitigation Plan. The report shall include mitigation, equivalent to the disturbed area; which will be located in another area of shoreline buffer. o A Geotechnical Report by a licensed engineering geologist may be required for the boat ramp expansion as it is located in a seismic hazard zone, modified shoreline slope, and moderate landslide hazard area. A geotechnical report is required for a publicly owned facility in a designated seismic hazard area. JCC18.22.170(9)((a)(iii). o The parcel is mapped as having potential archeological sites, upon noticing and depending on comments from DAHP and all local tribes; an Archeological Report may be required. o The applicant must show compliance with the following: ■ Boating Facilities — JCC18.25.350 • Dredging (if applicable for restoration) — JCC18.25.360 • Filling and excavation (if applicable for restoration) JCC18.25.370 • Conditional use permit criteria—JCC18.25.590 • General Requirements of Article VI, Chapter 18.25 JCC o After Jefferson County permit decision and 10-day appeal period to the hearing examiner for the conditional use permit, the application shall be sent to the Department of Ecology for review. Final approval is given by Washington State Department of Ecology. If approved by Department of Ecology, a 21-day appeal period begins. o The shoreline substantial development permit decision is made by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner. Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant -or any aggrieved party may -appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judicial appeals see JCC 18.40.340. Application & Fees Estimate: Complete Application Includes (JCC18.400.100): o Permit Application o Shoreline Substantial Development Application, Check boxes for both conditional use and substantial development. o Site plan • Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) location • Lot lines for the entire property • Location of all existing structures and proposed structures. • Location of proposed mitigation ■ Location of existing vegetation and types o Stormwater calculation worksheet o No -Net Loss/Mitigation Report by a qualified professional o Geotechnical Report by a qualified professional o An Archeological Monitoring Survey— if required by DAHP/Tribes. ■ 2020 Fees due at time of application: • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit • $2400.00 (25 hours review time) billed at $96.00 per hour after the 25 hours • $149.00 Notice of Application 0 $149.00 Notice of Hearing • $12.00 Notice Board • $24.00 Scanning Fee • $1279.25 Hearing Examiner Fee • $200.66 Technology Fee • $4,213.91 Total fee due at time of submittal DCD is combining the review for both permits to potentially save the applicant fees. The hours charged for a Shoreline Conditional Use (administrative) permit is for 16 hours or an additional $1536.00. DCD will invoice at a rate of $96.00 per hour for any amount of time above the initial 25 hours charged. Additional DCD fees may also include: SEPA review and other appropriate fees if applicable after the pre -application conference, building permit fees. Fees are based on 2020 fee schedule and are subject change. o Contact our reception desk for an appointment for intake at 360.379.4450. JCC 18.40.090(5) Assurances Unavailable. It is impossible for the conference to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues. The discussions at the conference or the information provided by the administrator shall not bind or prohibit the county's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by county representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of county, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. Pre -applications do not vest any portion of the development proposal. The applicant should read and understand all applicable statues, regulations, and rules. il Q i��+i WASHINGTON STATE '.&' e SeeWe MIMI Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) Forml,2 �,r eln] USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHM SPACEIS��.B�E�L�OW. � 11 !!� NOV 2 7 2019 Part 1—Project Identification A f — ^ ^ AGENCY USE ONLY --- 1 � Date received: I I I Agency reference #: Tax Parcel #(s): , L---------------------„I 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) h[ eV WDFW Point Whitney Access Renovations Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. h[ elo 2a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Christina Gourley 2b. Organization (If applicable) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 600 Capitol Way North 2d. City, State, Zip Olympia, WA. 98501-1091 2e. Phone (1) 2f. Phone (2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (360) 902-8392 (360) 902-8300 (360) 902-8367 Chris.Gourley@dfw.wa.gov lAdditional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit (RGP), contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for application information (206) 764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act, you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form (SPIF) or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at h . P:llwww. nws. Usace. armv. mil/Mis.s>_ons/Cl_vilWorks/Requlatorv/Perm itGuidebooklEndanoered Soecies. asox . • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits. If you need a Shoreline permit, contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. ZTo access an online JARPA form with [help] screens, go to htt :llwww.e ermittin .wa. ov/site/alias resourr-ecenterliarpa garpa form199841'ar a fom7.as x. For other help, contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or heloggoria.wa.gov. ORIA-16-011 Page 1 of 15 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [Ltipi 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 3b. Organization (If applicable) 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 3d. City, State, Zip 3e. Phone (1) 1 3f. Phone (2) 1 3g. Fax 13h. E-mail Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [ham) ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights -of -way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone (1) 4f. Phone (2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail I ORIA-16-011 Page 2 of 15 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [�1 ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [hel U ❑ Private�— ❑ Federal NOV 1� ® Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports, etc.) 2019 ❑ Tribal ! .- ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) — managed aquatic lands (Compiet ARPA Attachment ) 51b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) hf elpl Point Whitney Road 5c. City, State, Zip (If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) the p] Brinnon, WA 98320 5d. County hf aM Jefferson 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. hl el 1/4 Section Section Township Range NE'/4 7 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. IZf elol • Example: 47.03922 N lat. /-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees - NAD 83) 47.761791,-122.851412 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. (Leipi • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601071001 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) MOP] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel # (if known) Walter Dickerman 2230 Bee Mill Rd. 601074014 Brinnon, WA 98320 Reed C Gunstone Gift Trust PO Box 4118 601074001 Sequim, WA 98382 ORIA-16-011 Page 3 of 15 5i. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. hem The beach is listed as Estuarine intertidal aquatic bed unconsolidated shore, regularly flooded. 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. hf etl The project is adjacent to Quilcene and Dabob Bays within Hood Canal 51k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? hen] ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Zone A — Panel 5300690865B 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. �nel❑ Low -growing vegetation is present at the site. The parking area is graveled and has no vegetation. The parking area is not suitable habitat, though the beach and lagoon offer a variety of habitats for shorebirds, shellfish, forage fish, juvenile fish, and many other species. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [h pl The parking area is a state-owned access area for the public. There is a boat launch on the east side of the parking area that is used when cleared of sediment. There is a bathroom on -site (flush toilets and sinks) that are also for public access. Users access the parking area to support recreational opportunities of this site including shellfish harvest, boating, and fishing. Other buildings and facilities on -site are leased and are not used by WDFW. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. Ir,em Adjacent properties are primarily residential, including full-time and vacation homes. 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. L@Ai Public restroom and interpretive center are in good condition and were renovated within the last year. A kiosk is in good condition and is available to alert users of points of interest, safety, and other concerns. It was replaced within the last year. Formal office and lab buildings are in fair condition and currently used to provide office work areas for Ieasees. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. Lg] Take US highway 101 north through the town of Brinnon. Approximately 3 miles north of Brinnon, turn right onto Bee Mill Road. Continue on Bee Mill Road (turns into Point Whitney Road) for 2.2 miles. The access is at the end of the road. ORIA-16-011 Page 4 of 15 Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] This project focuses on improvements of the boat launch. The current launch will be left in place and new planks will be placed on top of the launch with steel bars/rails. This will raise the elevation of the ramp, keeping it in the same footprint, so the ramp will not be above the average. Articulated concrete mat will be placed along the sides of the new launch at an elevation that may meet but not exceed the beach elevation. The ramp is being raised to improve safety and reduce impacts on beach substrates in the area. Mitigation for the work will include removal of 2 piles within the lagoon area and the grading to the west end of the "point" to match the grade of the beach. This is a slight reduction in parking area, though no parking area is currently delineated. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. hel ] Sediments move rapidly within the area, especially with storm events. Because the launch was placed below grade, it is constantly covered in beach sediment and does not provide a safe launching area for users. By raising the elevation to just below or at grade of the current beach, sediment will not be hand removed by users to access waters and there is a lower potential impact on forage fish and shellfishing areas. It also provides users a tool to launch boats without getting tires, trailers, and vehicles stuck in beach sediments. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) (help] ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation M Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam / Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike / Levee / Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ® Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock / Pier ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: I NOV 2 7 2019 ORIA-16-011 Page 5 of 15 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. hl�l • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplam. A current boat launch exists at the site. Steel rails will be placed on top of the current launch and gaps between the rails will be filled with gravel. The new pre -cast concrete planks (28 planks, 4'x12'x6") will be placed on top of the rails and slid into place to approximately elevation -2.0. The planks are secured together with metal plates. Articulated concrete mats will line either side of the launch and the 4 foot wide mats (110 feet long) will be keyed into the substrate to help alert users when they have left the designated ramp and to aid in erosion of the launch. The mats are cabled together. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (Month/Year) Ifteip • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use DARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start Date:.July 2020 End Date: September 2021 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. JteLpl $300, 000 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? h( eM • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) LL!21p1 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. ❑ Not applicable 71b. Will the project impact wetlands? [neiul ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [hekoj ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know ORIA-16-011 Page 6 of 15 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? hf elcl • If Yes, submit the report, including data sheets, with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 3••- 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? (heia ■ If Yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? LLelpl • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [Lp] AvoV I r. 71h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type" (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres i ' If no official name for the wetland exists, create a unique name (such as "Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents, such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System. Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3Indicate the days, months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter "permanent" if applicable. 4 Creation C , Re-establishment/Rehabilitation (R), Enhancement E , Preservation P), Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee (B) i Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: ORIA-16-011 Page 7 of 15 7L For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. hlil 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. heI Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non -wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) fhelol ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. ["IPl ❑ Not applicable All project work is in and adjacent to the aquatic environment. All work will be done within the smallest extent possible for maintaining assets. No equipment will drive on the beach and will stay within the footprint of the current boat launch. The current launch is covered with sediment due to its elevation. By raising the elevation, fewer sediments will be disturbed as users attempt to use the popular launch. Eelgrass beds at the terminus of the ramp will also be impacted less due to the availability of the launch. Currently, users often drive off the launch area, potentially impacting fish life, aquatic plant life, and risking vehicle and human safety. This maintenance activity will reduce those risks. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [�et] ® Yes ❑ No ORIA-16-011 Page 8 of 15 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non -wetland waterbodies? Leioi • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. e If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Mitigation for this project includes 900 square feet of mitigation of removal of a graveled area, sometimes used for parking. This area will be regraded to meet the vegetation line at the west point to allow for increased plant growth and sediment movement. In addition, 2 creosote piles within the lagoon will be removed, reducing unwanted harmful chemicals in the system and opening additional area for shellfish establishment on the south side of the point. 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. s If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [ham The increase of the footprint with the maintenance to the boat launch will be approximately 744 square feet below MHHW. The removal of the angular gravel and piles was an acceptable mitigation for Habitat Biologists to issue a Hydraulic Project Approval under RCW 77.55 . Currently, the boat launch is covered in sediment and is often found "cleared" of sediment by users. Some users attempt to launch their boats without knowing where the launch is, potentially disturbing forage fish and shellfish, as well as power -loading near eelgrass beds. Given the limited amount of space at the site and the minimal square foot impact of the maintenance activities, it is anticipated that the proposed mitigation and proposed ac#ivities will be;atlequate mitigation for impacts anticipated. 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. hf elpl Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount -of. arterial Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location of impact3 (cubic yards) tob-e— linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or removed waterbody from waterbody directly affected Concrete planks Dabob Bay Above Permanent 7 CY 428 SF ABOVE, FILL MHHW current footprint Concrete planks Dabob Bay Below Permanent 19 CY 1156 SF BELOW, FILL MHHW current footprint Gravel (CUT) Dabob Bay Above Permanent 5 CY 136 SF ABOVE MHHW Permanent 744 SF BELOW Gravel CUT (CUT) Dabob BayBelow 12 CY MHHW Gravel (FILL) Dabob Bay Above Permanent 12 CY 428 SF ABOVE, MHHW current footprint Gravel (FILL) Dabob Bay Below Permanent 31 CY 1156 SF BELOW, MHHW current footprint Articulated Above Permanent Concrete Mats Dabob Bay MHHW 3 CY 136 SF ABOVE (FILL) Articulated Below Permanent Concrete Mats Dabob Bay MHHW 14 CY 744 SF BELOW FILL ' If no official name for the waterbody exists, create a unique name (such as "Stream 1') The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent, provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3 Indicate the days. months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter "permanent" if applicable. ORIA-16-011 Page 9 of 15 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. heI Boat launch planks are precast in the WDFW Lacey Shop and cured before being brought on site. Rails will be placed and gravels will backfill the spaces. All gravels will be placed between the rails, between the existing boat launch and the new launch planks. New planks will be slid into place with an excavator working within the current launch footprint. Articulated concrete mat is a product that is precast and assembled before being brought on site. It is placed with a spreader bar on an excavator and is placed from the ramp footprint after the ramp is placed. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Gravels will be excavated from the beach for the placement of the articulated concrete mats. No materials will be hauled off site. WDFW Habitat has instructed that the sediment be placed to the west of the new launch and sediment will transport as necessary and as it naturally would. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. IheIF] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact WDFW Chris Waldbillig 360-874-7258 07/29/19 WDFW Darrin Masters 360-764-9942 03/22/19 91b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? LLeM • If Yes, list the parameter(s) below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: httos:!lecol❑ v.wa.aoyMater- ShorelinesNVater- uali NVater-im rovement/Assessment-of-state-waters-303d. ® Yes ❑ No ORIA-16-011 Page 10 of 15 Listing 40303: Category 5 for bacteria (parameter) in water (media). ff'� L� N NOV 1 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project In . Go to http:!lcfoub.epa.gov/surf/locaterndex.ef-n to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA #) is the project in? h[ eiM ■ Go to https:lleoology.wa.govNVater-Shorelines/Water-suoolvlWateF-availability/Watershed-look-up to find the WRIA #. 17 9e. Will the in -water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? f ell ■ Go to httns://ecology.wa.gov/Water-Shorelines/Water-quality/Freshwater/Surface-water-quality-standards/Criteria for the standards. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? LI elpj • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. ■ For more information, go to: h s:llecolo .wa. avNVater-Shoreiines/Shoreline-coastal-m na ement/Shoreline-coastal- pl anni n g/S hone I i ne- laws -rules -and -cases . ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other: 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? hf e1 • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forest-practices-tivater-tvoina for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. 0 Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non -Fish Perennial ❑ Non -Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [heipj • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ® Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? hQ V If Yes, please describe below. ❑ Yes ® No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. hela ORIA-16-011 Page 11 of 15 The dikes on the site were built in 1953 to contain the lagoons for shellfish rearing. The boat launch has been available for public access for a number of years and the Navy owned the property before WDFW. A pier was removed within the last 10 years at the site as well. 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) surrey been performed on the project area? I,[ etpi O If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ® Yes ❑ No Please work with Adam Rorabaugh for Cultural Resources ORIA-16-011 Page 12 of 15 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. Lhelj Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) — Threatened Streaked horned lark (Eremophila alpestris strigata) — Threatened Yellow -billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) — Threatened Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) — Threatened Hood Canal Summer run Chum (Oncorhynchus keta) — Threatened Puget Sound Chinook (O. tshawytscha) — Threatened Puget Sound Steelhead (O. mykiss) — Threatened f."_I - I 1 7 1•• NU I rl,;y 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. Lhl eip] Common Name Sci¢ntific kame Priority area Display FeatureRcsoiulion Full Record T. Pacific Sand lance Ammo-Jvtes Breeding Area AS MAPPED Line [shows hompterus Pacific Sand Lance Ammodytes Breeding Area AS MAPPED 'Line Show Full •[..how} hexapterus Record Northern Spotted Owl Stdx Management Butler TOWNSHIP Area Show Full s w occidentalis Estuarine and Marine Null Aquatic HabRat AS MAPPED Area Wetland fshowl Northern Spotted Owl Stdx Management Buffer TOWNSHIP Area - - lshowl oaldentalis Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http:llapps.oria.wa.govlopas/. • Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or helpAoria.wa.gov. 0 For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) [help! • For more information about SEPA, go to https-llecoloay.wa.gov/reclulatlons-aermits/SEPA-environmental-review. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application- ® A SEPA determination is pending with WDFW (lead agency). The expected decision date is no later than December 31, 2019 ❑ 1 am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 10b.) hela] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. ORIA-16-011 Page 13 of 15 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) tg' I LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain)! Other City/County permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ® Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption — Attach Exemption Form Washington Department of Natural Resources: ® Aquatic Use Authorization Complete .DARPA Attachment E and submit a check for $25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ® Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT J United States Department of the Army (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ® Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ® Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non -bridge projects) United States Environmental Protection Agency: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification (discharges into waters of the U.S.) on tribal lands where tribes do not have treatment as a state (TAS) Tribal Permits: (Check with the tribe to see if there are other tribal permits, e.g., Tribal Environmental Protection Act, Shoreline Permits, Hydraulic Project Permits, or other in addition to CWA Section 401 WQC) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification (discharges into waters of the U.S.) where the tribe has treatment as a state (TAS). ORIA-16-011 Page 14 of 15 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. fhei 11a. Applicant Signature (required) help I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. _69 (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Christina L Gourley 1112-7/19 Applicant Printed Name Applica ignature Data_, 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature n[ ell I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this applicatia rue, complex and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and,] gree to st wa only after all necessary permits have been issued. V , '`• r Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [hel ] Not required if project is on existing rights -of -way or easements (provide copy of easement with JARPA)- I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance (ORIA) at (800) 917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call (877) 833- 6341. ORIA publication number: ORIA-16-011 rev. 08/2018 ORIA-16-011 Page 15 of 15 {q n June 30, 2019 Prepared for: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Prepared by: Consulting Engineers 612 Woodland Square Loop SE, Suite 100 Lacey, W4 93503 (360) 292-7230 (360) 292-7231 FAX '� . s r. #r �. " . r ir., .' I _yam • l �i r � � ^- '��/.. �. � �ti•� ._ ems► - KY�� _ ;� +�� s Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................3 2.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Project Location.............................................................................................................................4 2.2 Project Purpose.............................................................................................................................4 2.3 Site Information.............................................................................................................................4 3.0 Project Description......................................................................................................................5 3.1 Construction Project Details......................................................................................................6 3.2 Best Management Practices.......................................................................................................6 4.0 Work Window for Construction................................................................................................ 6 6.0 Existing Conditions....................................................................................................... .........6 6.1 Physical Indicators....................................................................................................................... 6 5.1.1 Terrestrial Setting.................................................................................................................6 6.1.2 Nearshore/Aquatic Setting.................................................................................................7 6.1.3 Wave Analysis.........................................................................................................................7 6.1.4 Eelgrass....................................................................................................................................7 5.2 Water Quality and Chemical Indicators...................................................................................8 6.3 Biological Indicators.....................................................................................................................8 5.3.1 Habitat Access..... . .......................................................... ...................................................... S 5.3.2 Forage Fish............................................................................................................................8 6.3.3 Shorelines and Vegetation.................................................................................................. 8 6.0 Area of Potential Effect and Project Action Area................................................................ 8 6.1 In -Water ............................................................................................................................................ 8 6.2 Terrestrial........................................................................................................................................9 6.3 Action Area.................................................................................................................................... 9 7.0 Affected Species and Critical Habitat...........................:.........................................................9 7.1 Birds................................................................................................................................................10 Northern Spotted Owl—Threatened........................................................................ ...................10 Marbled Murrelet—Threatened....................................................................................................11 Short -Tailed Albatross—Endangered..........................................................................................12 7.2 Salmonids and Char...................................................................................................................12 Puget Sound Chinook salmon—Threatened...............................................................................12 1IPage Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Hood Canal Summer -Run Chum Salmon —Threatened ................................... .........................13 Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout—Threatened............................................................................13 Puget Sound Steelhead—Threatened.......................................................................................... 14 7.3 Marine Mammals..........................................................................................................................15 Southern Resident Killer Whale—Endangered...........................................................................15 8.0 Analysis of Effects.....................................................................................................................16 8.1 Potential Direct Effects............................................................................................................16 8.2 Potential Indirect Effects...........................................................................................................17 8.3 Effects from Ongoing Project Activities (Continued operation and maintenance) ... 18 9.0 Conservation Measures............................................................................................................18 9.1 Mitigation Measures...................................................................................................................18 TimingLimitation..............................................................................................................................18 Shoreline and Habitat Enhancement............................................................................................18 10.0 Determination of Impacts for Listed Species.....................................................................18 10.1 Effect and Take Analysis of Listed Species.......................................................................18 NorthernSpotted Owl......................................................................................................................19 MarbledMurrelet...........................................................................................................................19 Short -tailed Albatross..,...................................................................................................................19 PugetSound Chinook salmon........................................................................................................20 Hood Canal Summer -Run chum and Coho Salmon...................................................................20 Coastal -Puget Sound Bull Trout.................................................................................................... 21 SouthernResident Killer Whale.....................................................................................................22 10.2 For each species, Physical or Biological Features (PBFs) as needed ....................... 22 11.0 Essential Fish Habitat...............................................................................................................22 11.1 Background. .................................................... 22 .......................................................... ............... 11.2 Identification of EFH............................................................................................................. ..23 11.3 Effects of Proposed Action..................................................................,................................. 23 11.4 Cumulative EFH Effects...........................................................................................................23 12.0 References...............................................................................................................................24 13.0 Analyst........................................................................................................................................... 25 2 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this biological assessment is to provide technical information and to review the proposed project in sufficient detail to determine to what extent the proposed project may affect threatened, endangered, or proposed species. KPFF has prepared this biological assessment in accordance with 50 CFR 402, legal requirements found in Section 7 (a) (2) of the Endangered Species Act. The document presents technical information upon which later decisions regarding project effects are developed. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife proposes to construct public facility water access improvements and vegetation restoration at Pt. Whitney, Jefferson County approximately two (2) miles west from US Highway 101. The purpose of the project is to renovate the existing boat ramp by installing new concrete planks on top of the existing boat ramp. Articulated concrete mats will be installed around the perimeter of this new ramp for erosion protection. Approximately 1000 sq. ft. of shoreline beach will be restored at the northwest edge of the parking lot. In addition, two (2) piles will be removed from the lagoon. The Action Area, totaling about 83 acres (ac), lies in the western side of DaBob Bay at the entrance of Quilcene Bay in Puget Sound. Natural land in the Action Area is primarily beach, nearshore and the nearshore riparian area. Species listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) that could occur in the Action Area include Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis), Marbled Murrelet (Brachyrampus marmoratus), Short -tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus), Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Hood Canal Summer -Run chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), Coastal —Puget Sound bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorhynuchus mykiss), and Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca); all species are listed as threatened under FESA. The proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect these species. Puget Sound Eelgrass (Zostera marina) is present waterward of the Action Area. Because of its importance as an ecosystem component, eelgrass is designated a habitat of special concern by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and critical habitat by the Washington Department of Ecology. Proposed work involving the boat ramp will not affect, or have a negligible effect on the surrounding eelgrass habitat. The proposed project includes numerous avoidance and minimization measures for special status species and habitats to reduce the potential for adverse effects. However, temporary impacts to the natural communities that cannot be avoided are discussed below. Construction related disturbance could result in temporary increases in turbidity during the first tides due to loosened sediment but natural conditions should be quickly restored. Heavy equipment used in construction activities will refrain rom being pose Toned on t�ie`�ieacti na d will be conducted with equipment positioned above the Ordinary High Water Mark. If within the OHWM, equipment will be positioned on the existing concrete ramp. Additionally, construction will result in temporary increased human activity - pedestrian and mechanical - that could result in disturbance near boat ramp and the adjacent shoreline. These construction impacts are expected offset through implementation of avoidance and minimization measures. The project's permanent impact will be the extended width of the existing boat ramp with the new 12 ft. x 4 ft. x 6 in. precast concrete planks and the 4 ft. wide articulated concrete matting on both sides of the ramp. The existing boat ramp occupies approximately 1,320 sq. ft. The renovations will extend the existing boat ramp footprint by 1,320 sq. ft. (including the new precast concrete planks and the articulated concrete mats), which makes the new boat ramp footprint approximately 2,640 sq. ft. The area covered by the articulated concrete matting will have a temporary negative effect on established benthic habitat. However, due to the patterns 3 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF of drift cell and sediment routing into the nearby embayment, the matting will highly likely be covered by new sediment within the first large storms of the upcoming winter. The energy -dissipating function of the articulated concrete mat will help stabilize the adjacent substrate, reduce scour and allow smaller gradations of sediment to accrete allowing macroinvertebrate communities to establish more readily. The ramp renovations will refrain boat trailer and vehicle traffic from impacting the finer, softer substrates in the nearshore. 2.0 Introduction Pt. Whitney is a public fishing and shell fishing spot that includes a boat launch, parking area, and general public recreation to DaBob Bay. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife desires to add elevation and width to an existing boat launch at Pt. Whitney. The Boat launch access shares the same access road and parking as the Pt. Whitney shellfish lab. The boat launch, parking area, and beach area is a popular public recreation area and Puget Sound access point. Many users utilize the ramp for crabbing, shrimping, and salmon fishing and users harvest shellfish along the beach. 2.1 Project Location Figure 1: Pt. Whitney Boot Romp The project is the Pt. Whitney boat ramp, which is located at 1000 Point Whitney Road in Brinnon, WA, Jefferson County. From Quilcene, head southwest on US-101 toward bee mill road and turn left onto Bee Mill Road. Continue on Bee Mill Road to Point Whitney Road and follow Point Whitney road to site (See Appendix A, Map 1). 2.2 Project Purpose The primary purpose of this project is to renovate the Pt. Whitney boat ramp to address surface water runoff, beach erosion, damage to boat ramp and increase safe user access. Other on -site improvements include improving ADA facilities and habitat improvements. 2.3 Site Information Figure 2: Pt. Whitney Shoreline The boat ramp is on the western shoreline of Dabob Bay in Puget Sound. The existing boat ramp is located on a short section of northward -facing gravel beach along a coastline that is dominantly east -west oriented. The shoreline exhibits a left to right drift cell direction and within about 600 ft. west of the boat ramp meets a divergence zone combining a right to left drift cell and alluvial fan formed by a low energy lagoon outlet and small tributaries. The boat ramp is located on a barrier spit that is continually recharged by the gravel and sand supply that moves northerly along Pt. Whitney Tide Lands Beach to the east. Incoming tidal 4 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF action and substantial wave height experienced by North Puget Sound beaches (Finlayson, 2006) keep importing an abundance of gravel that feeds the barrier spit (Please see Appendix A, Maps 2-3). 3.0 Project Description Due to sediment accrual, the Pt. Whitney boat ramp is currently requiring a high amount of maintenance and causing increased beach disturbance. The proposed project includes work on the ramp and the associated mitigation. Concrete planks will be overlaid on the existing ramp to form a new, wider ramp. Rods will be placed to level and raise the new ramp and voids will be filled with crushed rock. The new planks are 12 ft. x 4 ft. x 6 in. Existing planks are 10 ft. x 14 in. Four (4) ft. wide articulated concrete mats will be placed on both sides of the ramp and at the foot to provide erosion control to reduce the risk of undermining the ramp. All concrete is pre -cast and keyed into the substrate. The ramp will not be above the grade of the beach at highest use times and will be approximately 6-10 inches above the grade of the current ramp. This current depth of sediment on the ramps is being monitored regularly by staff to determine the best fit grade of the new ramp. Figure 3: Signs of erosion around the existing boat ramp The mitigation work includes the restoration of the western edge of the "point" at the west side of the project. Parking area and fill will be removed to match the existing grade of vegetation on the site (See Plan Set Sheet 9). The area is expected to revegetate naturally with grasses and low vegetation. The picnic table will be moved and a make -shift fire ring will be removed from r - = the site. Fencing panels (2 at 8 ft. each) will be removed and grading will not interfere with the rip rap on the south side of the "point." Figure 4: Proposed restoration area at end of spit In summary, the work includes: Parking lot improvement ■ Installation of new precast concrete planks on top of existing boat ramp and placement of articulated concrete mats on both sides Mitigation in toeC orris of -vegetation Ift. enhancement in 900 sq. to the north of the boat ramp i'' Y-,JP • Mitigation by removing 2 creosote piles from inside the lagoon 5 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 3.1 Construction Project Details Project components that may affect ESA -listed aquatic species include waterborne noise generated pile removal in case of a vibratory head use and potential water and sediment quality effects caused by plank and articulated concrete matting installation. The current ramp will stay in place. New 12 ft. x 4 ft. x 6 in. concrete planks will be installed on top of the existing ramp. The articulated concrete matting will be placed around the ramp — matting is 4 ft. wide and 20% open space. All concrete is precast (Please See Appendix D for full project plan set). Additional construction details of these activities are presented below. 3.2 Best Management Practices To avoid or minimize negative effects the following Best Management Practices will be applied: • Heavy equipment used for vegetation restoration will be land -based. All heavy equipment used for boat ramp improvements will be situated on the existing boat ramp. This minimizes disturbance, compaction and degradation of beach habitat and minimizes risk of oil leaks on beach. • Barge mounted pile removal with placement on barge for transport to boat ramp for removal is intended. This eliminates the potential for scour by placing a piling directly on the beach. Upland coir logs, or other sediment control devices that trap and/or filter overland runoff placed for stormwater overland flow diversion and management during construction period. This will eliminate the potential for overland runoff of sediment or contaminant -laden waters into the beach area during construction period. • Other marine area BMPs to be determined by HPA. 4.0 Work Window for Construction The approved work window for the marine areas of Puget Sound is July 16 to September 30. This project is contained within Tidal Reference Area 3 (South Puget Sound) with considerations for salmon, bull trout, surf smelt and sand lance. For this proposed project, WDFW would complete all work subject to tidal influence within the specified work windows. However, work could be completed after September 30 and before February 15 following a negative forage fish survey. 5.0 Existing Conditions 5.1 Physical Indicators 5.1.1 Terrestrial Setting Adjacent uplands include forested areas amidst single-family residences. The beach upland ecotone is nearly continuous -forested or well -vegetated. Within 2 miles of the project area there a few small steep -gradient tributaries creating alluvial fans. The immediate uplands contain a parking lot partially paved and partially graveled. The paved area drains out 6 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF through the boat launch access. There is minor erosion once the surface run-off engages the beach, but does not appear to affect beach habitat (Please see Appendix B for site photos). 5.1.2 Nearshore/Aquatic Setting The shoreline to the south of Pt. Whitney is dominated by a gravel beach that terminates at approximately the high tide line in a steep bluff extending to approximately 50 ft. to 80 ft. above sea level. The average beach slope is 12.5%. Slope increases at the upper portions of the beach. Substrate size increases down slope. The shoreline exhibits a left to right drift cell direction and within about 600 ft. west of the boat ramp meets a divergence zone combining a right to left drift cell and alluvial fan formed by a low energy lagoon outlet and small tributaries. The material here is relatively coarse, ranging in size Figure 5: Pt. Whitney shoreline, south of boat ramp, from gravel to boulders. The northward facing actively transporting drift beach interacts with an outlet of a tidal lagoon to the west (Inc., 2018). The material in the lower portion of the bluffs is relatively resistant interbedded sands and gravels that tilt towards the north. The shoreline directly adjacent to the boat ramp is documented to be much finer than the rest of the shoreline (Please see Appendix B for site photos). 5.1.3 Wave Analysis Results from a wave analysis study conducted by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (Inc., 2018) indicate that when offshore winds are from the NNW and N directions, waves reach the shore approximately head on and result in cross -shore transport. When the offshore winds are from the NE and southerly directions (SSW, S, and SSE), waves refract and diffract around Pt. Whitney and travel along the shore from east to west. When waves approach the shore at an angle, a longshore current will be generated. On this shoreline, east to west sediment transport during the southerly storm event is the dominant factor in the ongoing sand deposition onto the boat ramp. 5.1.4 Eelgrass Eelgrass and other seagrasses play a key role in the nearshore ecosystem environments by providing habitat for a wide range of organisms across multiple life stages. Eelgrass beds also help prevent erosion and increase shoreline stability by anchoring seafloor sediment (Resources, 2019). Eelgrass is a federally -designated Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) and a Habitat of Particular Concern (HPC) under the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1996. GeoEngineers completed a seagrass delineation and identified a continuous eelgrass bed near the waterward extent of the boat ramp (GeoEngineers, Point Whitney Eelgrass Delineation Report, 2018) (Please see Appendix A, Map 4). In Puget Sound, the maximum depth to which eelgrass grows ranges from approximately 1.3 m below the low tide line (MLLW) to greater than 9 m deep. At Pt. Whitney boat ramp area the eelgrass beds elevation extent is from -2 ft. to -14 ft. tidal datum. 7 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 5.2 Water Quality and Chemical Indicators Quilcene-Dabob Pollution Identification and Correction (PIC), which ran from December 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, had a goal to restore and protect surface waters for shellfish harvest, recreational use, and aquatic life habitat. Marine algal blooms can occur in the Dabob Bay and in 2014 the highest levels of paralytic shellfish poison biotoxins was measured in Washington oysters (Health, 2017). Septic system leakage remains a problem in Hood Canal contributing to nutrient loading. Sediment quality was measured in 2004 by the Washington State Department of Ecology as part of the Puget Sound Assessment and Monitoring Program (PSAMP). The areas closest to Pt. Whitney were found to be intermediate/high quality and intermediate/low quality sediments (Long, Weakland, Dutch, & Partridge, 2004). For a critical areas map from Jefferson County please see Appendix C, Report 2. 5.3 Biological Indicators 5.3.1 Habitat Access Some riprap may affect migration between upland and the beach (see Appendix B, Photo 3). On the back side of the spit, fencing may affect transient wildlife desiring to migrate between the beach and lagoon. To a limited extent, openings in the fence accommodate these foraging behaviors and 16 ft. of fencing will be removed in this project. The foreshore gradient is about 10 — 12% towards the upper beach and decreases westward approaching the lagoon alluvial fan. Upland habitats are generally available through forested lands that comprise most of the habitat type above MHHW. 5.3.2 Forage Fish The pea gravel/sand mix in the upper tidal elevation of the beach provide ideal spawning habitat for surf smelt (Hull, Lee, & Joyce, 2014). Herring spawning habitat is documented at the project site and southward through Pt. Whitney Tideland Beach. The eelgrass beds provide a key substrate for herring spawn (See Appendix A, Map 4). 5.3.3 Shorelines and Vegetation Shoreline is rock/gravel substrate transitioning into mudflats moving seaward. Shoreline vegetation is minimal —most of the upland area is part of the boat ramp and existing parking lot and facilities. Substrate shows a segregation by particle size —the further inland, the smaller the particle size. Pt. Whitney also supports clam and oyster beds as a part of its shoreline. 6.0 Area of Potential Effect and Project Action Area 6.1 In -Water The area of direct effect includes the dimension of the existing boat ramp footprint, which is approximately 1320 sq. ft (area of new concrete apron). The indirect area of effect includes the beach on both sides of the boat ramp. Longitudinal sediment transport may be affected by the proposed boat ramp as sediment may accumulate on one side higher than the other. There is an adequate supply of sediment that any temporary changes to sediment elevation levels will soon be replenished by subsequent tides or storms. 8 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 6.2 Terrestrial The area of direct effect for terrestrial habitat includes the swales and ditches that exist for managing the current surface water runoff. Adjacent riparian resources will not be affected. 6.3 Action Area Potential project impacts are sedimentation resulting from newly placed material used for boat ramp grading and regrading of mitigation area, and noise from equipment. Supplemental gravel used to level the surface for positioning the new concrete mat and or placement of the fill may be a source of lost sediment potentially suspended at post -project wave and tidal action before settling of sediment occurs. Heavy equipment accessing and using the uplands parking area may produce increased noise levels and spill risks associated with heavy equipment use. The action area extends into and beyond the lagoon where a vibratory hammer will be used for creosote piling removal. NOAA Fisheries has adopted the following Interim Criteria for injury and disturbance thresholds for fish (Stadler & Woodbury, 2009): v 206 decibels (dB) Peak re: 1 micropascal (pPa) for all fish; v 187 dB accumulated sound exposure level (SEL; 1 micropascal squared seconds [NPa2 sec]) for fish greater than 2 grams; and v 183 dB SEL re: 1 pPa2 sec for fish less than 2 grams. Vibratory hammers, in particular in soft sediment and in extraction, will not approach these criteria. Equipment use on the uplands and boat ramp could potentially carry a noise effect for'/ -mile upland. Where direct or indirect effects of the proposed action may occur encompasses % mile up and down the beach and waterward '/z mile. Please see Appendix A, Map 1 for Action Area map. 7.0 Affected Species and Critical Habitat The following species list and sensitive areas were derived by accessing: Priority Habitat Species Online Map (Wildlife W. S., 2019)(Please see Appendix C, Figure 1 for full report) ■ Essential Fish Habitat Online Map (Association, 2017) S Priority Area Pacific Sand Lance (Ammodjdes hexa terus Breeding Area Surf Smelt (HypomeSUS Dretiosus Breeding Area Pandalid shrimp Para andalus narvao Presence Dungeness Crab Metacarcinus magiste6 Presence Pacific Herrin (Georgia Basin DPS)(Clu ea atlas► Breeding Area Geoduck Panopea enerosa) Presence Estuarine and Marine Wetlands Critical Habitat Subtidal Hardshell Clam Presence Oyster Beds Presence Hardshell Clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) Presence Pacific Salmon Freshwater EFH Critical Habitat Nearshore Rockfish Critical Habitat Critical Habitat Table 1: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitats and Species present at the Pt. Whitney Project location 9 1 P a g e Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Species Listed in Action Area Birds Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) Fish/Aquatic Invertebrates Puget Sound Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), Surf Smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), Finfish (multiple species), Groundfish (multiplespecies) Mammals (Marine and Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), Leatherback Sea Terrestrial) Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), Stellar Sea Lion (Eumetopias "ubatus), American mink (Neovison vison Table 2: Species of Likely Occurrence —species that are not listed as Threatened or Endangered but may be in the area affected by the Pt. Whitney Project S cies Status Jurisdiction Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) T USFWS Northern Spotted Owl critical habitat No designated habitat in AA Marbled Murrelet Brach ram hus marmoratus T rUSFWS No designated habitat in AA Marbled Murrelet critical habitat Short -tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus) E I USFWS Short -tailed albatross critical habitat No designated habitat in AA Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tsha scha T I USFWS Puget Sound chinook salmon critical habitat LAA Hood Canal Summer -Run chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta) T I USFWS Hood Canal Summer -Run chum salmon critical habitat LAA Coastal — Puget Sound bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) T USFWS Coastal — Puget Sound bull trout critical habitat LAA Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorhynchus m kiss T I USFWS Puget Sound steelhead critical habitat LAA Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) E USFWS j Southern Resident Killer Whale critical habitat No designated habitat in AA Table 3: United States Endangered Species Act listed species that may be affected by the Pt. Whitney Project 7.1 Birds Northern Spotted Owl —Threatened The Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1990 ( 55 FR 26114 26194) (Service, Species Profile for the Northern Spotted Owl, 2019). The spotted owl inhabits structurally complex forests from southwest British Columbia through the Cascade Mountains and coastal ranges in Washington, Oregon, and California, as far south as Marin County. Past habitat loss and current habitat loss are some of the major threats to the spotted owl, even though loss of habitat due to timber harvest has been greatly reduced on Federal lands over the past two decades. Many populations of spotted owls continue to decline, especially in the northern parts of the subspecies' range, even with extensive maintenance and restoration of spotted owl habitat in recent years. Managing sufficient habitat for the spotted owl now and into the future is important for its recovery. 101 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Critical Habitat Critical habitat for the Northern spotted owl was designated originally in 1991 (56FR 50701 50704) (Service, Species Profile for the Northern Spotted Owl, 2019) and a revised designation was finalized in 2012 (77FR 71875 72068) (Service, Species Profile for the Northern Spotted Owl, 2019). Currently 9,577,969 acres in 11 units and 69 subunits across California, Oregon, and Washington are designated as critical habitat for the Northern spotted owl. Scientific research and monitoring indicate spotted owls generally rely on mature and old - growth forests because these habitats contain the structures and characteristics required for nesting, roosting, and foraging. Although spotted owls can disperse through highly fragmented forested areas, the stand -level and landscape -level attributes of forests needed to facilitate successful dispersal have not been thoroughly evaluated or described. Marbled Murrelet—Threatened Marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) were listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1992. Marbled murrelets are year-round residents on Washington marine waters. These birds forage in sheltered waterways and harbors generally within 1.2 miles of shore, selecting feeding areas that are closer to shore than other alcid seabirds that forage in Washington waters. Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) is the primary prey species of marbled murrelets, constituting over 65% of their diet, especially during the breeding season. Other prey species include pacific herring (Clupea harengus), seaperch (Cymatogaster aggregate), euphausiids, and other marine invertebrates. Marbled murrelets breed from April 1 to September 15 and nest in mature and old growth forests within 60 miles of marine waters. Potential threats to marbled murrelet populations include loss of old -growth forest, disturbance during nesting, nest predation, oil spills, entanglement in gill nets, and disturbance during foraging. Marbled murrelets forage and winter in marine habitats in the Salish Sea in relatively low densities with the highest numbers generally observed in fall. There are no appropriate marbled murrelet nest sites in the Action Area; however, these birds likely forage nearby. Critical Habitat Critical Habitat for the marbled murrelet was designated in 1996 to protect nesting areas with the physical or biological features (PBFs) described as (1) trees with potential nesting platforms and, (2) forested areas within '/ mile of the potential nest trees with a canopy height of at least % of the site potential tree height (81 FIR 51348 51370) (Service, Marbeled Murrelet Species Profile, 2019). Marine forage areas are not specifically designated as critical habitat however, forage habitat is implied as important through general PBFs including but not limited to the following: • Space for individual and population growth and for normal behavior; • Food, water, air, light, minerals or other nutritional or psychological requirements ■ Cover or shelter; • Sites for breeding, reproduction, rearing of offspring; and Habitats that are protected from disturbance or are representative of the historic geographical and ecological distributions of a species. 111 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Short -Tailed Albatross —Endangered The short -tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus) was federally listed as endangered throughout its range, including the United States, on July 31, 2000 (65 FIR 147:46643-46654), Prior to that, it had been listed as endangered throughout its range except within the United States and its territorial waters. The short -tailed albatross is a large pelagic bird with long narrow wings adapted for soaring just above the water surface. The bill, which is disproportionately large compared to the bills of other northern hemisphere albatross, is pink with a bluish hooked tip and a conspicuous thin black line around the base. Like all birds in the Order Procellariiformes (tube -nosed marine birds), the short -tailed albatross' beak has conspicuous external nostrils. Critical Habitat At the time of listing, designation of critical habitat was determined to be not prudent. The short -tailed albatross forages at sea and there have been sightings in Jefferson County so they are being included in this biological assessment. 7.2 Salmonids and Char Puget Sound Chinook salmon —Threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) was listed as Threatened under ESA (64FR 14308) on August 2, 1999 and a recent five-year review of this listing completed on August 15, 2011 concluded that Puget Sound chinook salmon should remain listed as Threatened (76FR 50448). Spawning populations of Chinook salmon are distributed along the Pacific Coast of North America from the Ventura River in southern California to Point Hope and Alaska (Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). Chinook salmon can be found throughout the year in the Salish Sea. Factors leading to the decline of Chinook salmon populations in Puget Sound include: • Degradation of spawning and rearing habitat due to human activities • Limited access to historic spawning habitat due to development activities • Altered stream flow regimes and water temperatures • Loss of riparian vegetation and soils that alter hydrologic and erosion rates • Increased sedimentation • Decreased large woody debris (LWD) in rivers and loss of potential recruitment of LWD • Filled estuarine rearing area • Channelizing and diking of rivers leading to loss of rearing and spawning habitat ■ Dams blocking access to historic spawning and rearing channels and altering hydrologic regimes, water temperature and sediment transport Critical Habitat The final designation of critical habitat for Puget Sound evolutionary significant unit of Chinook salmon was published on September 2, 2005 (70FR 52630) (Service, Chinook salmon Species Profile, 2019). PBFs of the nearshore marine critical habitat include: 121Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF ■ Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation • Natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, and side channels. Hood Canal Summer -Run Chum Salmon —Threatened The Hood Canal Summer Run (Oncorhynchus keta) Chum is one of the two evolutionarily significant units of chum salmon that are listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act, which was listed on August 2, 1999 (59FR 46808) (Service, Chum salmon Species Profile, 2019). Chum salmon have a complex life history that includes spawning and incubation in rivers and upon emergence, followed by nearly immediate migration to saltwater to feed, grow, and mature before returning to freshwater to spawn. They are vulnerable to many stressors and threats including blocked access to spawning grounds and habitat degradation caused by dams and culverts. • Degradation of spawning and rearing habitat due to human activities • Limited access to historic spawning habitat due to development activities • Altered stream flow regimes and water temperatures • Loss of riparian vegetation and soils that alter hydrologic and erosion rates ■ Increased sedimentation • Decreased large woody debris (LWD) in rivers and loss of potential recruitment of LWD • Filled estuarine rearing area ■ Channelizing and diking of rivers leading to loss of rearing and spawning habitat ■ Dams blocking access to historic spawning and rearing channels and altering hydrologic regimes, water temperature and sediment transport Critical Habitat Critical habitat was designated in the Federal Register as a final rule for the Hood Canal summer chum salmon ESU on February 16, 2000 (65 FR 7764) (Service, Chum salmon Species Profile, 2019). Critical habitat designated in the Federal Register Notice includes all river reaches accessible to listed chum salmon (including estuarine areas and tributaries) draining into Hood Canal as well as Olympic Peninsula rivers between and including Hood Canal and Dungeness Bay, Washington. Also included are estuarine/marine areas of Hood Canal, Admiralty Inlet, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca to the 106 international boundary and as far west as a straight line extending north from Dungeness Bay. Excluded are areas above Cushman Dam in the Skokomish River Basin or above longstanding, naturally impassable barriers in the above, defined area (i.e. natural waterfalls in existence for at least several hundred years). Coastal/Puget Sound Bull Trout —Threatened Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout was listed as Threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1998 (Service, Bull Trout Species Profile, 2019). Bull trout in the Coastal -Puget Sound interim recovery unit exhibit anadromous, adfluvial, fluvial, and resident life history 131Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF patterns. The anadromous life history form is unique to this unit. This interim recovery unit currently contains 14 core areas and 67 local populations (USFWS 2004b). Bull trout are distributed throughout most of the large rivers and associated tributary systems within this unit. With only a few exceptions, bull trout continue to be present in nearly all major watersheds where they likely occurred historically within this unit. Generally, bull trout distribution has contracted and abundance has declined especially in the southeastern part of the unit. The current condition of the bull trout in this interim recovery unit is attributed to the adverse effects of dams, forest management practices (e.g., timber harvest and associated road building activities), agricultural practices (e.g., diking, water control structures, draining of wetlands, channelization, and the removal of riparian vegetation), livestock grazing, roads, mining, urbanization, poaching and incidental mortality from other targeted fisheries, and the introduction of non-native species Critical Habitat Critical habitat for Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout was originally designated in 2005 (70FR 56212 56311) (Service, Bull Trout Species Profile, 2019) and revised in 2010 (75FR 63898 64070) (Service, Bull Trout Species Profile, 2019). As of 2010, there is 19, 729 miles of streams (which includes 754 miles of marine shoreline) as critical habitat for bull trout in Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, and Montana. The final designation of critical habitat for Puget Sound evolutionary significant unit of Chinook salmon was published on September 2, 2005 (70FR 52630) (Service, Chinook salmon Species Profile, 2019). PBFs of the nearshore marine critical habitat includes: • Colder water temperature —they typically prefer water temperatures between 5 and 15 degrees Celsius Cleanest stream substrates for spawning and rearing Complex habitats —streams with riffles and deep pools, undercut banks, lots of large wood/logs for shelter and foraging • Habitat connection—rivers/lakes/oceans that connect to headwater streams for annual spawning and feeding migrations Puget Sound Steelhead—Threatened The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 2009 (50 CFR 223.102) (Service, Puget Sound Steelhead Species Profile, 2019) as a distinct population segment (DIPS). Steelhead are similar to some Pacific salmon in their life cycle and ecological requirements. They are born in fresh water streams, where they spend their first 1-3 years of life. They then emigrate to the ocean where most of their growth occurs. After spending between one to four growing seasons in the ocean, steelhead return to their native fresh water stream to spawn. Unlike Pacific salmon, steelhead do not necessarily die after spawning and are able to spawn more than once (iteroparous). Steelhead trout are a unique species. Individuals develop differently depending on their environment. All steelhead trout hatch in gravel -bottomed, fast -flowing, well -oxygenated rivers and streams. Some stay in fresh water all their lives, as resident rainbow trout. Steelhead trout that migrate to the ocean typically grow larger than those that remain in freshwater. They utilize the nearshore area in preparation for Puget Sound and northward 141 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF seaward migrations but have an early offshore movement (Goetz 2016). After various times spent in the marine areas by different stock they return to freshwater to spawn, their various timings lending to their life history diversity. Steelhead trout are vulnerable to many stressors and threats including blocked access to spawning grounds and habitat degradation caused by dams and culverts. Critical Habitat The specific areas designated for Puget Sound steelhead include approximately 2,031 mi (3,269 km) of freshwater and estuarine habitat in Puget Sound, WA. The final designation of critical habitat for Puget Sound evolutionary significant unit of Steelhead was published on September 2, 2005 (70FR 52630) (Service, Puget Sound Steelhead Species Profile, 2019). The Project Action Area is within the nearshore marine critical area (Unit 19). This includes all nearshore zones of the Strait of Georgia, Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca from extreme high water out to a depth of 100 ft. PBFs of the nearshore marine critical habitat include: • Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage, including aquatic invertebrates and fishes, supporting growth and maturation e Natural cover such as submerged and overhanging large wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks and boulders, and side channels. 7.3 Marine Mammals Southern Resident Killer Whale —Endangered The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed southern resident killer whales as endangered under the ESA on November 15, 2005 (70 FR 69903) (Service, Southern Resident Killer Whale Species Profile, 2019). The listing became effective on February 16, 2006 and a five-year review published in January 2011 hound that the status should remain as endangered. Eastern Norther Pacific killer whale populations are classified as one of three distinct forms: residents, transients, and offshores. The southern resident killer whale population in distributed in the Pacific coastal waters from central California to the Queen Charlotte Islands, and may be a subspecies or Orcinus orca (Krahn et al. 2004). The southern resident population is comprised of about 90 animals within a single clan (J) which is composed of three pods (J, K, and Q. Since the late 1990s, the three (3) southern resident killer whale pods have spent much of the year in the inland waters of Washington and British Columbia, Canada. This geographic region is bounded by Race Rocks at the southern end of Vancouver Island and Port Angeles on the Olympic Peninsula, the Fraser River Delta in British Columbia the San Juan Islands, and the north end of the Quimper Peninsula in Washington. Southern resident killer whales typically arrive in this region along major corridors of migrating Pacific salmon by late spring (May -June) and depart during winter (December -February). During the early fall, southern resident killer whales expand their routine movements into Puget Sound to likely take advantage of chum and chinook salmon runs (Wiles 2004). Southern resident killer whales face a number of potential threats including: 1. Reductions of quality and quantity in prey availability; 2. Exposure to environmental contaminants, and; 3. Disturbance by whale -watching vessels and underwater noise (Wiles 2004) 151 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Critical Habitat Proposed critical habitat for southern resident killer whale was published on June 15, 2006 (71 FR 34571) (Service, Southern Resident Killer Whale Species Profile, 2019) that specific three (3) areas for designation: • The summer core area in Haro Strait, Strait of Georgia, and waters around the San Juan Islands ■ Puget Sound ■ Strait of Juan de Fuca Physical or biological features of Southern Resident Killer Whale critical habitat are: 1. Water quality to support growth and development; 2. Prey species of sufficient quantity, quality and availability to support individual growth, reproduction and development, as well as overall population growth; and, Passage conditions to allow for migration, resting and foraging. 8.0 Analysis of Effects 8.1 Potential Direct Effects Summary of potential effects: Construction element potendal. Effect e Temporary increased turbidity due to installation of new materials • Subsurface macro invertebrate Ramp renovation disturbance • Decreased wave energy ■ Noise/acoustic impacts • Temporary loss of surface substrate replaced by concrete apron Shoreline restoration Y Wildlife use o Shoreline stabilization a Localized sediment disturbance • Underwater sound Piling removal ■ Increase benthic habitat functionality • Gain in aquatic habitat area • Improved local water quality During ramp renovation construction activities heavy equipment will be operated within the existing, footprint of the boat ramp. Although there will be some disturbance of sediment that is removed from on top of the boat ramp to prepare for the new structure, negative effects will be minimal. There may be some additional disturbance from noise while project work is being completed, but this is not anticipated to cause any permanent effects. Shoreline restoration activities will be short and temporary in duration. Native vegetation is anticipated within one season. 161 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF The planned piling removal with a vibratory extractor is expected to have adverse effects to salmonids due to high levels of underwater noise (The use of the term noise is to represent unwanted sound. Sound and ambient background are not considered adverse) The scenario here at Pt. Whitney suggests conditions and application of the vibratory hammer will be less impacting to salmonids and birds than is typical of pile driving, hammer or vibratory. Some noise path reduction attenuating factors include non -reflective soft sediments, high elevation and dense vegetation in the riparian area and increased topography away from the shoreline breaking line of sight. NMFS considers using vibratory hammers to be less harmful to fish and this application involves pulling two (2) pilings from soft sediments. This application lacks the impulsive sound source with high intensity and rapid rise time known to injure or kill fish experienced by impact hammers in denser substrates. The barge mounted application with pilings staged on the barge and transferred to land out of water minimizes exposure of the previously buried pile portions. The Action Area may experience localized disturbance of sediment as well as sediment plumes as each of the pilings is removed or cut. The negative effects of these actions will be minimal, with local turbidity returning to normal conditions within an hour of the completed work. 8.2 Potential Indirect Effects Indirect Effect Potential Effect Ramp renovation • Height increase of new ramp will temporarily alter longitudinal transport of sediments. • Foreshore slope may increase due to accretion of sediment at the upper end of the beach • The beach west of the new ramp may be deprived of sediment or may have its routing altered. Shoreline restoration • Enhance shorebird use • Stabilizes the point bar of the spit Piling removal 0 Localized sediment disturbance • Increase benthic habitat functionality • Gain in aquatic habitat area • Improved local water quality The ramp renovation will be an increase to the existing ramp footprint and the addition of new materials may cause a change in sediment transport because of the height increase. The planned shoreline restoration could enhance shorebird use by increasing diversity of species of the plant community and providing additional plants as additional habitat in the area. Additionally as the supplemental plants mature, they will add increased stability to the point bar of the spit. Piling removal will eliminate the negative effects on water quality by removing a long term source of contamination. 171Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 8.3 Effects from Ongoing Project Activities (Continued operation and maintenance) One of the goals of this project is to lessen the need for regular maintenance of the boat ramp. Any post project work will be conducted from the same ramp. Post project impacts are negligible. 9.0 Conservation Measures 9.1 Mitigation Measures Timing Limitation In -water work will only be allowed from July 1 to August 31 for the protection of salmon and bull trout. All work below the MHHW will occur in the allowable work window. Shoreline and Habitat Enhancement A portion of the area to the west of the boat ramp will be part of a mitigation plan. WDFW will relocate one picnic table; remove one (1) fire pit and two (2) 8 ft. sections of chain link fences. The edge of the area will be excavated to match the elevation of the top of the beach. Approximately 900 sq. ft. will be designated a part of this mitigation area. Additionally, two (2) creosote pilings will be removed from the lagoon area. 10.0 Determination of Impacts for Listed Species 10.1 Effect and Take Analysis of Listed Species Measures taken during the proposed work to minimize impacts associated with air and water quality, clearing of vegetation, and size of the construction footprint will reduce the potential for incidental take. Measures will be taken to avoid and minimize impacts to federally listed species and their habitats. Due to the nature of the proposed project work, no take is expected. Conservation windows, including construction windows and water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed to minimize negative impacts within the Action Area and minimize the possibility of incidental take. See Section 3 for BMP list. S ecles - - Take Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) None Northern Spotted Owl critical habitat NE 7NE Marbled Murrelet (Brach ram hus marmoratus) None Marbled Murrelet critical habitat Short -tailed albatross Phoebastria albatrus NLAA I None 181Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Short -tailed albatross critical habitat NE Puget Sound Chinook salmon Oncorh nchus tshaw scha NLAA I None Puget Sound Chinook salmon critical habitat LAA Hood Canal Summer -Run Chum salmon (Oncorh nchus keta) NLAA I None Hood Canal Summer -Run Chum salmon critical habitat LAA Coastal — Puget Sound bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) NLAA I None Coastal — Puget Sound bull trout critical habitat LAA Puget Sound steelhead Oncorh nchus m kiss) NLAA None Puget Sound steelhead critical habitat LAA Southern Resident Killer Whale Orcinus orca) NLAA I None Southern Resident Killer Whale critical habitat NE NLAA: Not Likely to Adversely Affect, LAA: Likely to Adversely Affect, NE: No Effect Table 4: Determination of Effects to ESA listed species and their Critical Habitat Northern Spotted Owl The proposed Pt. Whitney projects will have no effect on designated critical habitat or populations for the northern spotted owl; though there is critical habitat listed in Jefferson County, there is no critical habitat in the action area. Air -borne noise may disturb feeding northern spotted owls in the action area. The proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the population of northern spotted owl. Critical Habitat Effects Determination The Action Area associated with the proposed Pt. Whitney projects will involve increasing the boat ramp footprint, but it does not include designated critical habitat for the Northern spotted owl. The Project would therefore have no effect on critical habitat for Northern spotted owl. Marbled Murrelet The proposed Pt. Whitney projects may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect populations of the marbled murrelet. Air -borne noise may disturb feeding marbled murrelet in the action area. Disturbance of marine vegetation may alter the area for herring spawning which may temporarily affect a main food source for marbled murrelets in/near the project area. However, marine algae will become reestablished within one (1) or two (2) growing seasons and any effects from the project will be short-lived. Critical Habitat Effects Determination The Action Area associated with the proposed Pt. Whitney projects will include increasing the boat ramp footprint, but does not include designated critical habitat for the marbled murrelet. The Project would therefore have no effect on critical habitat for marbled murrelet. Short -tailed Albatross The proposed Pt. Whitney projects may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect populations of the short -tailed albatross. Though there is not currently a record of critical habitat listed, there have been sightings of these birds in Jefferson County. Air -borne noise may disturb feeding short -tailed albatross in the action area. Disturbance of marine vegetation may alter the area for herring spawning which may temporarily affect a main food source for short -tailed albatross in/near the project area. However, marine algae will become reestablished within one or two growing seasons and any effects from the project activities will 191Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF be short-lived. The proposed project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the population of short -tailed albatross. Critical Habitat Effects Determination Currently there is not any critical habitat designated for the short -tailed albatross, therefore these projects should have no effect on critical habitat for the short -tailed albatross. Puget Sound Chinook salmon The proposed projects at Pt. Whitney may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect Puget Sound Chinook salmon. Chinook salmon are known to occur in eelgrass beds and may utilize the Action Area for cover, refuge and forage areas. During construction, there may be a temporary decrease in water quality due to sediment disruption. However, with the wave energy in the nearshore habitat this sediment should disperse quickly and not cause any permanent adverse effects to the eelgrass beds or surrounding nearshore habitat. Critical Habitat Effects Determination The Action Area associated with the proposed Luhr's Landing projects does include critical habitat for juvenile and adult Puget Sound Chinook salmon. The ramp renovations may temporarily disturb nearshore substrates and increase turbidity. Additionally, some benthic/nearshore habitat will be lost with the expansion of the boat ramp. The shoreline enhancement may temporarily increase sedimentation due to removal of material and native plant installation. Additionally the removal of two (2) pilings from the lagoon area may temporarily increase localized turbidity in addition to adding more benthic habitat. Though there will be adverse effects to the Chinook salmon habitat, all effects are expected to be temporary or minimal. Physical or Biological Features (PBFs) Determination The PBFs for Puget Sound Chinook salmon include: estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity, and salinity conditions supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh and saltwater; Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage; Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage. The increased footprint (additional 1320 sq. ft.) of articulated concrete apron will cover benthic habitat in the nearshore environment. Though there will be adverse effects to this PBF in its baseline amount, the direct and indirect effects of the project and its restoration elements will have a positive net benefit to Chinook juvenile foraging. The ramp height increase may alter the foreshore slightly adjacent to the ramp providing some beach stability adjacent to the boat ramp. This will allow perennial establishment of sub surface macro -invertebrates that may otherwise be routed on a regular basis due to the high drift cell load. The effect of the ramp will be temporary regarding effects of juvenile chinook foraging. When natural structures occur on the beach such as logs or rock outcrops, juvenile salmon may navigate around or use incoming tide heights to increase surface water above the structure before foraging upshore. Hood Canal Summer -Run chum and Coho Salmon The proposed Pt. Whitney projects may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect, Hood Canal summer -run salmon or Coho salmon. Juvenile salmon utilize nearshore environments 201Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF like those in the Action Area for cover, refuge, and foraging during their marine transition. However, project work will occur during the allowable work window and although juvenile salmon may be present, it is unlikely that fish will be harmed. Critical Habitat Effect Determination The proposed project activities will affect salmonid critical habitat by reducing water quality due to topsoil disruption, however, any increased sedimentation in the nearshore environment will dissipate. Additionally, some benthic/nearshore habitat will be lost with the expansion of the boat ramp. Therefore, the proposed projects will affect the critical nearshore habitat for salmon but these effects will be either temporary or minimal. Physical or Biological Features (PBFs) Determination The PBFs for Hood Canal summer -run Chum include: estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity, and salinity conditions supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh and saltwater; Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water quality and quantity conditions and forage; Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage. The increased footprint (additional 1320 sq. ft.) of articulated concrete apron will cover benthic habitat in the nearshore environment. Though there will be adverse effects to this PBF in its baseline amount, the direct and indirect effects of the project and its restoration elements will have a positive net benefit to juvenile Chum foraging. The ramp height increase may alter the foreshore slightly adjacent to the ramp providing some beach stability adjacent to the boat ramp. This will allow perennial establishment of sub surface macro -invertebrates that may otherwise be routed on a regular basis due to the high drift cell load. The effect of the ramp will be temporary regarding effects of juvenile Chum foraging. When natural structures occur on the beach such as logs or rock outcrops, juvenile salmon may navigate around or use incoming tide heights to increase surface water above the structure before foraging upshore. Coastal -Puget Sound Bull Trout The proposed Pt. Whitney projects may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect, Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout. The Action Area contains habitat that is preferable for juvenile bull trout: cold water, cover, and coarse substrate material (cobbles/gravel). Additionally adult bull trout are known to use nearshore marine habitat during migration back to their native stream for cover, refuge, and foraging. Work will be completed during the allowable work window and although bull trout may be present, it is unlikely that any will be harmed. Critical Habitat Effects Determination The proposed project activities will affect bull trout critical habitat by reducing water quality due to beach sediment disruption during construction, however any increased sedimentation in the nearshore environment will dissipate. Additionally, some benthic/nearshore habitat will be lost with the expansion of the boat ramp. Therefore, the proposed projects will affect the critical nearshore habitat for Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout, however the effects will either be temporary or minimal. Physical or Biological Feature (PBFs) Determination The PBFs for Coastal -Puget Sound Bull Trout include: estuarine areas free of obstruction with water quality, water quantity, and salinity conditions supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh and saltwater; Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction with water 211 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF quality and quantity conditions and forage; Offshore marine areas with water quality conditions and forage. The increased footprint (additional 1320 sq. ft.) of articulated concrete apron will cover benthic habitat in the nearshore environment. Though there will be adverse effects to this PBF in its baseline amount, the direct and indirect effects of the project and its restoration elements will have a positive net benefit to Bull Trout foraging. The ramp height increase may alter the foreshore slightly adjacent to the ramp providing some beach stability adjacent to the boat ramp. This will allow perennial establishment of sub surface macro -invertebrates that may otherwise be routed on a regular basis due to the high drift cell load. The effect of the ramp will be temporary regarding effects of Bull Trout foraging. When natural structures occur on the beach such as logs or rock outcrops, juvenile salmon may navigate around or use incoming tide heights to increase surface water above the structure before foraging upshore. Southern Resident Killer Whale The project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Southern Resident killer whales. Killer whales may be present in the action area on occasion but underwater sound will be minimal and will not disturb marine mammals beyond the 0.5-mile action area. Critical Habitat Effects Determination The Action Area associated with the proposed Pt. Whitney projects does include listed critical habitat for Southern resident killer whales. The construction work may disrupt nearshore substrate, which may, in turn affect localized water quality. However, any effects will be minimal and temporary and therefore will not permanently adversely affect Southern resident killer whale habitat. 10.2 For each species, Physical or Biological Features (PBFs) as needed Species Physical or Biological Feature Puget Sound chinook Estuarine areas free of obstruction with water Hood Canal Summer -Run chum quality, water quantity, and salinity conditions Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout supporting juvenile and adult physiological transitions between fresh and saltwater. Puget Sound chinook Nearshore marine areas free of obstruction Hood Canal Summer -Run chum with water quality and quantity conditions and Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout forage. Puget Sound chinook Hood Canal Summer -Run chum Offshore marine areas with water quality Coastal -Puget Sound bull trout conditions and forage. 11.0 Essential Fish Habitat 11.1 Background The Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-267), requires Federal agencies to consult with NMFS on all activities that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (MSA 305(b) (2)). The 1996 amendments to the MSA resulted in a new emphasis on the sustainability of the nation's fisheries and established procedures designed to identify, conserve, and enhance Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for those species regulated under a Federal fisheries 221 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF management plan (FMP). Essential fish habitat is defined as "those waters and substrate fish need for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth 38 to maturity" (Association, 2017). The objective of this EFH assessment is to describe potential adverse effects to designated EFH for Federally -managed fisheries species within the proposed Action Area. It also describes conservation measures proposed to avoid, minimize, or otherwise offset potential adverse effects to designated EFH resulting from the proposed project. 11.2 Identification of EFH The Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) has designated EFH for the Pacific salmon fishery. The Pacific salmon management unit includes chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), and pink salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). The EFH designation for the Pacific salmon fishery is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary for salmon production needed to support a long-term sustainable salmon fishery and salmon contributions to a healthy ecosystem" (PFMC, 1999). Chinook, chum, sockeye, and Coho salmon have listed essential fish habitat (for juveniles and adults) and finfish, krill, coastal pelagic species and groundfish for all life stages are listed in the project area t Pt. Whitney. The PFMC also identifies the estuarine and seagrass habitats located at Pt. Whitney. 11.3 Effects of Proposed Action The Pt. Whitney project (which includes ramp renovations and shoreline mitigation) is within the nearshore and estuarine habitat is identified as EFH for several species for foraging and breeding habitat. This project will not substantially alter the existing environmental conditions or biological communities, will not permanently alter substrate and will not permanently impact water quality. The eelgrass beds adjacent to the boat ramp will not be impacted and the marine algae community will become reestablished within one or two growing seasons. Water quality will have a short-term impact due to increased turbidity during ramp renovations but once the project work is complete, water quality will not be altered from pre -project conditions. 11.4 Cumulative EFH Effects The ramp renovation construction will cause a temporary increase in turbidity and temporary loss of natural substrate by initial covering of sediment on the apron footprint. Additionally the removal of creosote pilings will also cause temporary increased turbidity in the nearshore habitat due to loosened substrate. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be used to minimize these effects during construction. Despite these effects occurring, the turbidity will dissipate and critical nearshore conditions will return to normal. In addition to increased turbidity, the removal of the creosote pilings will diversify local benthic habitat for many fish and invertebrate species as well as remove a potential source of pollutants. There will be minimal effect to designated critical habitat PBFs due to the indirect and direct effects of the proposed project. The site experiences significant sediment routing effects that will re-establish as the dominant process masking the short-term impacts of the elevated boat ramp and benthic habitat effects. The site should quickly re-establish a stable baseline condition of gently sloped beach and diverse sediment classes from the nearshore, foreshore to backshore environments. Migratory and foraging behaviors will be minimally impacted in the long term since the boat ramp edge is expected to have a contoured edge transition or buried in natural substrate; a condition expected to be reached quickly after some winter storms and newly recruited sediment. 23 1 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF 12.0 References Association, N. O. (2017). National Marine Fisheries Service, Habitat Conservation and Protection. Retrieved from Essential Fish Habitat: hftps://www.habitat.noaa.gov/application/efhmapper/index.htmi Finlayson, D. (2006). The geomorphology of Puget Sound beaches. Seattle: Washington Sea Grant Program, University of Washington. GeoEngineers. (2018). Luhr's Landing Eelgrass Delineation Report. Tacoma: GeoEngineers. GeoEngineers. (2018). Point Whitney Eelgrass Delineation Report. Tacoma: GeoEngineers. Health, J. C. (2017). Jefferson County Public Health Clean Water Projects. Retrieved from Quilcene-Dabob PIC Project: https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1151/Quilcene-Dabob-PlC- Project Hull, D., Lee, T., & Joyce, J. (2014). Intertidal Forage Fish Spawning Surveys in the Nisqually Reach Aquatic Reserve: Final Monitoring Report. Olympia: Nisqually Reach Aquatic Rserve Citizen Stewardship Committee. Inc., N. H. (2018). Point Whitney Boat Access Renovation Coastal Processes Assessment and Design Considerations. Seattle: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Inc. Long, E., Weakland, S., Dutch, K. W., & Partridge, V. (2004). Sediment Quality Assessmet of Puget Sound's Hood Canal Region. Olympia: Washington State Department of Ecology. Resources, W. S. (2019, June). Nearshore Habitat Eelgrass Monitoring. Retrieved from Aquatic Science: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs-and-services/aquatics/aquatic- science/nearshore-habitat-eelgrass-monitoring Service, U. F. (2019). Bull Trout Species Profile . Retrieved from Environmental Conservation Online System: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=EO65 Service, U. F. (2019). Chinook salmon Species Profile. Retrieved from Envionmental Conservation Online System: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=EO6D Service, U. F. (2019). Chum salmon Species Profile. Retrieved from Enviornmental Conservation Online System: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=EO9Q Service, U. F. (2019). Marbeled Murrelet Species Profile. Retrieved from Environmental Conservation Online System: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=BO8C Service, U. F. (2019). Puget Sound Steelhead Species Profile. Retrieved from Environmental Conservation Online Service: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=EO8D Service, U. F. (2019). Southem Resident Killer Whale Species Profile. Retrieved from Enviornmental Conservation Online System: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=AOIL 241 Page Biological Assessment Point Whitney I KPFF Service, U. F. (2019). Species Profile for the Northern Spotted Owl. Retrieved from Enviornmental Conservation Online System: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecpO/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=BO8B Stadler, J., & Woodbury, D. (2009). Assessing the effects to fishes from pile driving: Application of new hydroacoustic criteria. 38th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, 23-26. Wildlife, W. S. (1998). Salmonid stock inventory, bull trout and Dolly Varden.. Olympia: WDFW Fisheries Management Division. Wildlife, W. S. (2019). PHS on the Web. Retrieved from Priority Habitat Species: hftp://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/phsontheweb/ 13.0 Analyst Larry Dominguez, MES, has over 28 years of professional experience in salmon, freshwater, wetland, and nearshore ecology. He has held positions with USFWS as restoration biologist, NMFS as ESA consulting biologist, and for the majority of that period as biologist and scientist in the Washington Department of Natural Resources State Lands, Forest Practices, and Aquatic Lands Divisions developing Habitat Conservation plans and conducting effects analysis on WDNR terrestrial and aquatic land use practices. 251Page e z Lj U m �? c W m S CL: N 0 cc Ai m �V— C) N ti aj •`y' C ca N L O U Q i i C N E U co N cn N Q U 'O MO_ W N 'o (1) Q Appendix A --Maps Map 4: Eelgrass Bed Delineation Legend Delineated Eelgrass Boundary Eelgrass - Ramp Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Data Source: Aerial from GoogleEarthPro 2017. Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet Eelgrass extends offside Eelgrass Map Point Whitney Eelgrass Delineation Jefferson County, Washington GEOENGINEER� Figure Appendix B--Photos Photo 1: Image from the north side of the beach looking inland. Overview of site, approximate boat ramp location shown in yellow. The image portrays the abundant sand and gravel load the site is ex used to- _ - .,mac. :. r.•t `::-...;: Photo 2: Taken on the east side of the boat ramp looking west. Overview of the site. Yellow outline shows the approximate extent of the buried boat ramp. Now . _ �_ � • - `a:_ •f . may..It I — x . Oft 5: Upland of the boat ramp access infrastru here and towards the boat ramp. whfiI.AA,6. P,4 - - - - ------ M;x- Rpr Ad 1. 0-� • � A..� � � , y, N� n�, �', ` � rip �, � :F ti�-- � a A X 1 r� (D H w Z c N E LL oo) O O .1 �a cone m m w a Z 0 cn it z Q N 7 W 7 Cl) Z!c 5 f0 •— cocn m J J N = Q Q 2 w LL fn a Z z 0- LL v J M J� o O 0)m T C) a zO o Q z 2 w 7 N U) o N �/1 V/ � w c 1, LL T •,.O—, E cc OC) y c� E 0. (D(D Z/9 /w ¢_-0(D C C U C C ') C 0 E w0 a02M IL a. z 2z �a m tf w < d E o a r' 0 N-zQQm 3N U Eo�yyo �r� O 0 Z W (� ` °'00 0 or �'F-- cu Ur }, ao Cl) Cl) U) U)z U) Q Z �- U = � W += U) 0 L U Q E p p E U Z z N U C !G c "O p a Ow E E N m CD c U U m z 0 Q Q Q a) U N U) a a c m N y O LL A Z) a° 0 w a IL Q Z Q Q g = z z a c m ¢ z z aD c m C m N c m W N C O /LL T S O S a 0 w a a Q Z Q �Q Z a a Q a a z E E c U� >_ cn z CO E m U N L m 2 w 7 m t in LL O dU) C >p T a w L FE c m t LL 0 a C p 0 ¢ >. � a z c cc c a L C c m a R c c 3 3 c c C m m � � r Co. Cl) w D O O N O C N U L O t: .` 0 Z fn N c 5 O LL a > a 0 w a Q Z Q N J 1:� ¢ _ z z a �Q Z d d Q a a z z m E E c UI y Z in co a N m E m rn O d t N LL c O /LL a S O S a 0 w a a Q Z ¢ m 2) 0 m C� _ m a> a 2 U m w N U O. d U -CC a) y N _ O a) w O L E .O O N C O 7 O N . O � C Q fa 0 N d � 7 co O •- N C CD N E7 77 > > > > U U >co > O > > O N .w' c E j o ❑ LL aa)) c a (D c a aN) (S(s�� c U) aa)) O c a) O c a ns T o a a (s� o w T E C •- O Z J Z J S a S a O N O 7 O -.2 N a) C C o m o O_ N .(D O N a aE 7❑ m E N a] ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ N !�_ `00"0 a a a a a N Cn 2 Q Z Q z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q •rcn -C CU a) N C U)i 3 � m 7 I C Y C L U N M 3 a o C 3 o aa)) - N a) aa)) a) cn (D N) a •0 CL (D o f0 E C ? m d a m O. a) a L) a) a a) Q Z c 8 a) a) N 7 (I) N. CA U) U) U) to w> a) as a7 a) O yy VJ ra d d a) a) _ N C N C N U) _7 _ N Mn J N J Mn J Mn Ln N in d U a) > co J a1 a) f/'1 (/) Cn CI) J Cn J Cn J U) J (n a) Z a) C 70 7 C) LL N a z z a z z a z z a z z a z z a z z a z z a N O N C_ —ai f0 L C E 3 d a a� 7 LLmoN_ L U a fn U >, 4= 1q °)O3(D � -000"n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N U 0 0 � c c - o a) a N L _r_ C (6 J p N N > C O O o 0 w U O a) C C �p E C 7 V1 a) m o E [6 E E E m o� a N O 7 4 N a a3 a mam am aca o_ C C O) O) O) D7 O) O) O) Q) O) m a) a) a) a) C C a) O > ❑ C LL 10 a) a) o a a) () o 0 () a) o a a) a a) o a) a) c o❑ U U O CA a 02 � N d m m N N m m N N m m a) N N m m a) a) N N m` m N N a` N N a Q z N N N N a` a` Q z o 7 �) E o N N O•C p N C ._ L � T •3 N a) N N >^ m () m >+ m a) c a a) f6 N Z I ? Z t` Z m r Z m N N C a V L —2 dU rn a) U) rn a) U) M a`)U) o a)(% C) E E 4 3 ow [w O c4i L L I E N L L I E N r L L I E e- . L L I E N L L I E N E E ro C 0 E N N E❑ aa: Z LL Z LL N Z IL N N Z LL O N Z a O c �I C �I .�O L N O a❑7 m C a)I C a)I C a)I a' C a) CN �' > U) > ti •C w m f0 7 7 7 '_ 6❑ ❑ O O CD O W 7 C E V7 O CA 7 C O V O C) 7 C O m O 7 C C O m co (a 7 C O — L 0 O L a) O C O 'O J w Coco w fn LL CD O Cn LL (D O f/J LL h ,] O a7 Cn LL 7 O a7 Cn LL Z Cn Z U) 7 U U C OOa) N E N 7 N 7 N 7 N 7 E Q 3 E o N q7 [3 U U U U 2 U N O L O U >+ a) E m C, N x I N x C N x C, N x O_ a)F.N.. 7 .— O O E J J L J L J L J L N N � z z m 0 ram.+ I CQ m aa)) � � C a) Cn -0 � aNi U) � � m LLIEa��ioo N �_ •— ._ L O C> )_ E e � a � o o o -o m a) � CD � g N E m va'i ` c 0 c ,� c c o c w• c o Uo3aa))E O co -- a 9, - CL Ccu G L.L n i rr- E sq Y -2 a W U2 €0 E O N �� en cc 11i L N N ", o w g o d� wz r- �p N $ a o �< •1,; ow 0 o D w Q 0 �D d U) H C W a z a 0 Q � F- U Q U) J O IL m N Q _Q U 0 n Q a� _rn U 0 N a a v C 0 Appendix C--Critical Areas Reports Report 2: Jefferson County Critical Area Map for Point Whitney Appendix D--WDFW Plans PT WHITNEY PROJECT LOCATII vl RY MAP \ �- TD � SCALE STATE MAP NOT TO SCALE ECTIONS FROM QUILCENE. HEAD SOUTHWEST ON US-101 TOWARD BEE MILL ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO BEE MILL ROAD. CONTINUE ON BEE MILL ROAD TO POINT WHITNEY ROAD. FOLLOW POINT WHITNEY ROAD TO SITE_ T ENG. PROJECT NO..^A633:18-1 ...................... PO .-, A57.................. ......... DRAWN BY:.D.HENNING ................. REFERENCE NUMBER: PROJECN LMINT t&bRESS): PROPOSED PROJECT: APPLICANT: WHITNEY POINT WHITNEY WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH do WILDLIFE 16000 POINT WHITNEY ROAD ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT 600 CAPITOL WAY N. BRINNON, WA 98320 OLYMPIA. WA 98501-1091 IN: DABOB BAY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER: LAT/LONG: 47.45'42.03W/122.51'04.33W NEAR/AT: POINT WHITNEY 1. DATUM: TIDAL DATUM COUNTY: JEFFERSON 2 SHEET 1 OF 9 DATE:03/27/2019 STATE: WA VEWrr& KM BATTERED _ APPROX. LOG4TIWCIVTIEDGE MLLW D.00 ...:: \,; :': x ti :' PNTjI 2019•FOUND 2 1/2' - - ': �:..::--':^ti.:.:: •":::::::... ALUMINUM CAP NARKED _' 1 Pr WHIT 2 20D0" �`•ti: ..... �+r'�� . " ". ' IC ' ............; N: 204468.60 E: 1143559.76 �"^l`- - - • �.'...`.e ELEV 14.24 (TIDAL DATUM) .. k : - DADDB BAY PNr# 1500 FOUND 1/2" Rmw ::::::�r — �"- '.,y.``� ! I AND CAP (Nil MARKINGS) OHW 11.55� —.. 4 N: 2a4457.41 E: 11435714W _ ELEV - 14.90 (TIDAL DATUM) •---�-� —``� ""� RGL PpiHr wHIT s CONCRETE BOATRAMP�/_ NEBAR 8: 28441 M. CAP N.48 E: 114F109.84fGRAVEL ELEV - 15.13 (TIDAL DATUM) �1 — 11 SEE SHEET 3 --� � . `r �� TRAlUM C NERATOR y' APP' X. 13.2' VEGETATION LINE �� • S+-1 VEGETATION LINE EDGE OF I _ ! EDGE OF GUARD ASPHALT MLLW 0.00 PARKING LOT W01) Z POSTS _ ti - \PAVEMENT RGRAVEL OAD RAMP _ LOG WH .EP LAGOON RACEWAY EDGE ' INTERPRETIVE I a•- -' CENTER i JI. kl �' .. AND / RESTROOM \ i . flo ^ - AD IN. BUILDING •40 f f f 1 1 ' r 8' CHAINLINK -45 II FENCE 9 ve I J% EXISTING SITE PLAN s -, o scIOU 25 7!. Tao Sao SCALE: 1" - 100' REFERENCE NUMBER: V1 �� APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE 01-G PROPOSED PROJECT: \ �0 ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT r[. LOCATION: POINT WHITNEY ENG. PROJECT N0, JN:A633 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING SHEET 2 OF 9 DATE:OS 27 2D19 - .-� MI,I.W / STRAW WATTLES DABOB BAY PICNIC TABLE TO BE RELOCATED LINE OF VEGETATION LINE � ._... _ STOPSyWHM TYP • � � MHHW 11.55 � .. f 5' • FIRE PIT 44,-,�� CONSYgUCT47H i .��TO BE REMOVED LIMITSA 1� GRAVEL PARKING L0 - - - --� i BARRIER LOG TYP EDGE OF ll�MLLW PARKING LOT D.00 REMOVE B SECTIONS OO F CHAIN��,-• �� _ LINK FENCE ENG. PROJECT NO. F 01- OFZAWN BY: D. HENNING DRAW WATTLE DETAIL aOTO SCALE 1. PREPARE THE SLOPE BEFORE THE WATTLING PROCEDURE IS STARTED. 2. SHALLOW GULLIES SHOULD BE SMOOTHED AS WORK PROGRESSES. 3. DIG SMALL TRENCHES ACROSS THE SLOPE ON CONTOUR, TO PLACE ROLLS IN. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE HALF THE THICKNESS OF THE ROLL WHEN THE SOIL IS LOOSE AND UNCOMPACTED, THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY THE ROLL 2/3 OF ITS THICKNESS BECAUSE THE GROUND WILL SETTLE. 4. IT 15 CRITICAL THAT ROLLS ARE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO WATER MOVEMENT. PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE CONTOUR. 5. START BUILDING TRENCHES AND INSTALL ROLLS FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AND WORK UP. 6. CONSTRUCT TRENCHES AT CONTOUR INTERVALS OF 3-12 FEET APART DEPENDING ON STEEPNESS OF SLOPE. THE STEEPER THE SLOPE, THE CLOSER TOGETHER THE TRENCHES. 1:1-10' 2:1-20' 3:1-30' 4.1-40' 7. LAY THE ROLL ALONG THE TRENCHES FITTING IT SNUGLY AGAINST THE SOIL MAKE SURE NO GAPS EXIST BETWEEN THE SOIL AND THE STRAW WATTLE B. USE A STRAIGHT BAR TO DRIVE HOLES THROUGH THE WATTLE AND INTO THE SOLL FOR THE WILLOW OR WOODEN STAKES. 9. DRIVE THE STAKE THROUGH PREPARED HOLE INTO SOIL LEAVE ONLY 1 OR 2 INCHES OF STAKE EXPOSED ABOVE ROLL 10. IF USING WILLOW STAKES REFER TO LIVE STAKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 11. INSTALL STAKES AT LEAST EVERY 4 FEET APART THROUGH THE WATTLE. ADDITIONAL STAKES MAY BE DRIVEN ON THE DOWNSLOPE SIDE OF THE TRENCHES ON HIGHLY EROSIVE OR VERY STEEP SLOPES. 12. INSPECT THE STRAW ROLLS AND THE SLOPES AFTER SIGNIFICANT STORMS. MAKE SURE THE ROLLS ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL 13. REPAIR ANY RILLS OR GULLYS PROMPTLY. 14. RESEED OR REPLANT VEGETATION IF NECESSARY UNTIL THE SLOPE IS STABILIZED. of � LNG. PROJECT NO. Jig:r%u :10- npAW■+ n- HFNNING REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT LOCATION: POINT WHITNEY SHEET 4 OF 9 DATE:03/27/2019 `MLLW 0.00 L CHAIN ENG. PROJECT NO. BATTERED PILING APPROX LOCA77ON AT BOTTOM _ .. . LAWON fm —•� ' FAC: ern, AND RESTROOM -- - - r / I II 1 I II l II 1 I PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1DO- C 54 100 20D 25 75 iso srairi, t - tDD f� REFERENCI APPLICANT G �J WASHI PROPOSED �,G �[,� ACCESS 1? LOCATION: _ DRAWN BY: D. HENNING SHEET NOTE: A SIGN WILL BE PLACED ON THE INTERPRETATIVE BOARD STATING THAT "NO MOTOR VEHICLES ALLOWED ON THE BEACH. EMPTY BOAT TRAILERS ARE AUTHORIZED* APPROX. 13.2' VEGETATION LINE EDGE OF .•. ASPHALT PAVEMMFT BIIrSUILHERT LDWOo1ND � ,1 J� n�1 ADMIN BUILDING ENG. PROJECT NO. JN:A633:18-1 MLLw O.DO ll! • ` 47Ci2_a RAMP ` PLANKS TO APPRDX ~ELN -2.0 t CONCRETE BOAT RAMP TO REMAIN —, \ MHHW 11 55 ARTICULATED CONCRETE MAT NAVY DEPARTMENT MONUMENT CORNER NUMBER U.S.N. 15 5' BELOW GRAVEL SURFACE 4- g - t ,o ABORT _PbdE SITE PLAN ZTN 4 0 + 30 1 25, ¢fi V 'D ■ " 30' REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT NAME: [� WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: VV ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT LocAnON: POINT WHITNEY DRAWN ay: D. HENNING SHEET 6 of 9 DATE:03/27/2019 0 v) svvL- lyy�l.I i I il i ll N ll ii1�+ Iarg Lill Ij jI! li��I I,1 EXISi1NG GROUND EM. APPROX 1.60 I I I END OF EXISTING RAMP END OF NEW RAMP { jI� �•`I Ilaro STA.. 1+5B.1'ID� i 1 i111! lII!li.;l rnr S •OCISRNG RACONCRETE [iOAT MP TO REMAIN I� IEII_�• I,I� ,i _ ; ;I,• I , �r ELEV. APPROX. - 5,42 Il;f II! GRADE BREAK STA. - 1+14.04i jr III INSTALL 3 RAGS TO INSTALL AND LEVEL NEW RA11P WANKS. SIZE TO BE OETERIAINI71 AT A UTTER GATE. INSTALL (28) 4'X12'X6' RAMP PLANKS TO APPROX. ELEVATION -2.0. --- ELEV. = 15.69 BEGfNlt3NG OF NEW �RA � EM. - 15.21 KQIHNING Of NLW ASPHALT ENG. PROJECT NO. M AG33:18-1 o m o n o- I I DRAWN 9Y, D. HENNING r M TYPICAL RAMP PLANK PLAN NOT 10 SCALE KEEP FLUSH ISM TOP OF COICRiE ¢•_p• Mp_p• IMP PLNq - M1P TYP CONY RAMP 7O an&W i' . 42' . orOM AN WALLM d1 * OF Del" %V4, cL. I. - -4, TED E MAT, N SPACE. M7LL ALL MV1O1 .rtiH SJY CLEM L7WMW-D SIIAYAS Sh ' w �H 9M SM A1pGi IIIClICR CAiL O�IE1fIRi J L i xr" ummgnxm ` w ` V lam 11 OR ff w TV CNI[L ORVC 11HLJdt RACE i' OF 1 7J4' 1110130W�hPM. Um aqu ■R sm COLT L11E 6 MARL CFJW ,y,7m my Ulm r Nmm �. "MOD,`"``°' RAMP PLANK A 8 6 sm- SEE SITE PLAN FOR SIZE AND LAYOUT OF ARTICULATED CONCRETE MATS ENG. PROJECT NO. JN:Ab.5.5251 REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT LOCATION: POINT WHITNEY SHEET 8 OF 9 DATE.03/29/2O19 NG PPAARRKING AIR A WHEEL STOPS - TYP ELEWINUM CIF RESTURATO1N • 1� SET BY MATCHING THE TOP , • • ]J w' ' OF REACH r RELOCATED PICNIC TABLE GRAVEL/VEGETATION LINE J. � - LINE OF VEGETATION LINE l . . . . i J -. . .900 SF.� r �r• GRAVEL PARKING 1 MMGA710M AREA AREA n EXCAVATE TO 70 EXISTING �� _ •_' f. ELEVATION 4L _ 20' B4RRIER LOG — SLOPE TRANSITK?N AT _ CORNER_ FILL REI L Sr1ALL NOT DISTURB ANY EXISrM RIP RAF 6' CHAINLINK 1 FENCE MHHW 11.55 _ MLLW 0.00 1 � PROPOSED MITIGATION P SCALE: 1- .. 20- 0 10 a ae 5 �5 SCALE. 1' - 20' Fob ENG. PROJECT No. JNA633:18-1 DRAWN aY: D. HENNING Appendix E--Creosote Piling Removal Best Management Practices (BMPs) Washington Department of Natural Resources Derelict Creosote Piling Removal Best Management Practices For Pile Removal & Disposal The fbllosving Best Management Practices (BMPs) are adapted from EPA guidance (2005), Washington State Department ofTinnsportation (-WSDOT) methods and conservation activities as included in Joint Aquatic Resources Protection Application (JARPA) 2005. and Washington State Department of Resources (W.'IDNR) "Standard Practice for the Use and Removal of Treated Wood and Pilings on and from State -Owned Aquatic Lands" 2005. as well as WADNR's practical experience thmtugh managing piling removal prgjects since 2006. The purpose of these BMPs is to control turbidity and sediments rc-rnlering the water column during pile removal, and prescribe debris capture and disposal Of removed piles and debris. BMP 1. PILE REMOVAL Crane operator shall be experienced in pile removal. Piles will be removed slowly. This will minimize turbidity in the water column as well as sediment disturbance. Pulled pile shall be placed in a containment basin to capture any adhering sediment. This should be done immediately after the pile is initially removed iaom the water. A. Vibratory extraction 1) This is the preferred method of pile removal. Vihratc ry extraction shall always be employed first unless the pile is too decayed or short for the vibratory hammer to bgiip_ After consultation with WADNR, the alternative options listed below may he used. 21 The vibrwory hammer is a Isrge mechanical device (5-16 ions) that is suspended from a crane by a cable. The hammer is activated to loosen the piling; by vibrating as the piling is pulled up. The hammer is shut off when the end of the piling reaches the mudline. Vibratory extraction takes approximately 15 to 30 minutes per piling depending on piling length and sediment condition_ 3) Operator will "Wake up" pile to break up bond with sediment_ • Vibrating breaks the skirl iiiction bond between pile and soil. + Band breaking avoids pulling out a large block of soil possibly breaking off the pile in [lie prrEcess. Usually there[,; little or no sediment attached to the skin of the pilau during withdrawal: hi sonic cases material may be attached to the pile tip. in line with the pile. B- Direct Pull 1) This method is optional if the contractor determines it to be appropriate for the substrate type, pile length, and structural integrity of the piling, Vibratory extractor must be attempted first unless there is risk of greater disturbance of sediments. Updntrd tr�Sr'3Crt7 2) filings arc %Tapped with a choker cable or chain that is attached at the top to a crane. The crane pulls the piling directly upward, removing the piling ftom the sediment- C. Clamshell Removal 1) Broken and damaged pilings that cannot he removed by either the vibratory hammer or direct pull may be removed with either a clamshell bucket or environmental clamshell. 2) A clamshell is a hinged steel apparatus that operates like a set of steel jaws. The bucket is lowered from a er-dne and the jaws grasp the piling stub as the crane pulls up. 3) The size of the clamshell bucket shall be minimized to reduce turbidity during piling removal. 4) The clamshell bucket shall be emptied of material onto a contained area on the barge before it is lowered into the water, D. Cutting 1) Is required if the pile breaks at or near the existing substrate and cannot be removed by other methods. 2) If a bile is broken or breaks during extraction. all of the methods listed below should be used to cut the pile. a_ Piles located in intertidal and shallo sub6dai areas that are less than -10 feet deep VILLW shall be cut at least 2 feet below the mudline. b. In subtidal areas that are greater than -10 feet deep MLLAf, piles shall be cut at least 1 root below the mudline, c. Piles shall be cutoff at lowest practical tide condition and at slack water. This is intended to reduce turbidity due to reduced flow and shout water column through which pile must be withdrawn. d. 1\o hydraulic jetting devices shall be used to move sediment away from piles, Excavation of gedimeni in subtidal areas to expose broken piles shall be accomplished by divers using hand tools. e. The contractor shall provide the location of all the broken and cut piles using a Gl S. BMP 2. BARGE OPERATIONS, WORK SURFACE, CONTAINMENT A. Barge grounding will not be permitted. B, Work surface can barge deck or pier. or upland staging, area shall include a containment basin for all treated materials and any sediment removed during pulling. Creosote shall be prevented from re-entering the water, Uncontaminated water run-off can return to the waterway. 2 Updated 1125 Q1017 1) Containment basin shall be constructed of'durable plastic sheeting with continuous sidewalls supported by hay bales, ecology blocks, other non -contaminated materials, or support structure to contain all sediment and creosote. Containment basin shall Sc lined with oil absorbent boom, 2) Work surface on barge deck and adjacent pier shall be cleaned by disposing orsedirnent or other residues along with cut ofTpiling as described in B.MP #4.13. 3) Containment basin shall be rumovcd and disposed in accordance with BMP 44.8 or in another manner complying with applicable federal and state regulations. 4) Upon removal from substrate the pile shall be moved expeditiously from the water into the containment basin. The pile shall not be shaker}, hosed -off. left hanging to drip or any other action intended to clean or remove adhering material fTnnt The pile. BMP 3. DEBRIS CAPTURE IN WATER A, A floating surface boom shall he installed to capture floating surface debris. The floating boom shall be equipped with absorbent pads to contain any oil sheens. Debris will be collected and disposed of along with cut off piling as described in BMP #4. B. The hooch may be anchored with four or fewer'./_ ecology blocks or a similar anchoring device, These anchors must be removed once the project is complete. The anchor -zystem shall be located to avoid damage from vessel props to eelgrass, kelp, ;and other significant rnacroalgae species. The line length between the anchor and surface float shall not exceed the water depth as measured at extreme high tide plus a maximwn of 20 percent additional line for scope. The buoy system shall include a subsurface tloat designed to kimp the line behvecn the anchor and surface float ttom contacting the bottom during 104A- tide cycles. The subsurface float shall be located off the bottom a distance equal to 113 The line length C. The boom shall be located at a sufficient distance from all sides of the structure or piles that are being removed to ensure that contaminated materials are captured_ The boom shall stay in its original location until any sheen pretenl From removed pilings has been absorbed by the boom. BMP #313 may be used it) keep the booth in its original location. D. Debris contained within boom. shall be removed at the end of each work day cir immediately if waters are rough and there is a chance that debris may escape the boom. E. To the extent possible all sawdust shall be prevented from contacting beach, bed, or renters of the state. For example. sawdust on top of decking should be removed immediately OCT sawing operations. F. Any sawdust that enters the water shall be collected immediately and placed in the containment basin. G. Piles removed from the water shall be transferred to the containment basin without leaving the boomed area to prevent creosote from dripping outside of the boom. Updated 1,25r^017 BMP 4. DISPOSAL OF PILING, SEDIMENT AND CONSTRUCTION RESIDUE A. Piles shall be cut into lengths as required by the disposal company. B. Curt up piling, sediments, absorbent padsiboom. construction residue and plastic sheeting From containment basin shall be packed into container. for disposal, ship to an approved Subtitle D Landfill. C, Creosote -treated materials shall not be reused. BMP 5. RESUSPENSIONITURBIDITY A. Crane operator shati be trained to remove pile from sediment slowly. B, Work shall be done in low water and low current, to the extent possible. C. Removed piles shall be placed in a containment facility. D, Sediments spilled on work surfaces shall he contained and disposed of with the pile debris at permitted upland disposal site. E. Healey remaining after piling removal shall not be tilled_ BMP 6. PROJECT OVERSIGHT A. WADNR will have a project inattager or other assigned personnel can site. Oversight responsibilities may include. but are not limited to the following: I ) Water duality monitoring to ensure turbidity levels remain within required parameters 2) Ensure contractor follows BMPs 3) E..nsure contractor is in compliance with contract and permit requirements 4) Ensure correct structures are removed S) Maintain contact with regulatory agencies should issues or emergencies arse BMP 7. CULTURAL RESOURCES A. In the event that artifacts (other than the pilings or materials attached to them) that appear to be 50 years told or older are found during the prciject, the WADNR Aquatics archaeologist must be notified in order to evaluate the hind and arrange for any necessary consultation and mitigation required by 13w. B. If human remains or suspected human remains are found during the project, work in the vicinity will be hafted Immediately, acid the County Coroner must be notified immediately, lf- Up-dated Ir25!2017 the remains are detcrmined to be non -forensic, them the WADNR Aquatics archaeologist will be notified to begin tribal and Washington State Dcpartmeni of Archaeology and Historic Preservation consultations required by law. C. If sediment exceeding 1 cubic meter is removed, the WADNR Aquatics archaeologist will be notified and given the opportunity to examine the sediment for cultural materials before it is removed from the containment area. Updated IJ2512017 Shannen Cartmel From: Douglass, Daisy P CIV USARMY CENWS (USA) <Daisy.P.Douglass@usace.army.miI> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 11:59 AM To: Shannen Cartmel;-darrin.masters@dfw.wa-.gov;-Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget (DNR); Rothwell, Rebecca (ECY) Subject: NWS-2019-1027 RE: New drawings CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi All, For tomorrow's meeting, I have set up a conference line for those of us who plan to call -in: Call -in number: 1-888-278-0296 Access code: 5861688 If you are prompted for a security code, please enter 6789 Thank you, Daisy Douglass Project Manager, Biologist Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Seattle District 206-764-6903 Mailing Address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 -----Original Message ----- From: Shannen Cartmel[mailto:SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 8:54 AM To: Douglass, Daisy P CIV USARMY CENWS (USA) <Daisy.P.Douglass@usace.army.mil>; darrin.masters@dfw.wa.gov; Kaminski -Richardson, Bridget (DNR) <Bridget.Kaminski-Richardson@dnr.wa.gov>; Rothwell, Rebecca (ECY) <rebs461 @ ECY. WA.GOV> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: New drawings Good morning all, Please see the updated drawings for tomorrow's Pre-APP. 1 Respectfully, Shannen Cartmel Assistant Planner Jefferson County Community Development 11 611 Sheridan St., Port Townsend, WA 98368 Wn-Thurs 9am - 4:30pm, closed from 12-1 :a P6:360-379-4454 Fax:360-379-4451 sca!rtmel@co.jefferson.wa.us<mailto:scartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Blockedhttp://www.co.jefferson.wa.us <Blockedhttp://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/> DCD offers an online scheduling calendar <Blockedhttps://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/Facilities/Facility/Details/DCD-Staff- Consultations-3> to request appointments, submit questions, and pay consultation fees on our website front page. Appointment times for this new service are available Tuesday -Thursday from 1pm-4:30pm. Customers must request appointments at least 48 hours in advance. Walk-in hours are 10:30am-12pm Monday -Thursday. All walk-in meetings as well as appointments require a minimum $50 for 30 minutes or $100 for 1 hour. From: Gourley, Christina L (DFW) <Christina.Gourley@dfw.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 8:09 AM To: Shannen Cartmel <SCartmel@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: New drawings CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. Hi Shannen, REVISED PROJECT � LOCATION C3� DEC 17 2019 EFFERSON COUNTY DCD N STATE MAP NOT TO SCALE nEA'T QUILCEN QU g En En Z z W a o J ID5gALKER f m 1 m i L f f5 cn z PROJECT i z 1Qt LOCATION li A7 .V0 (T 00' A� D OLYMPIC NATIONAL Dd FOREST x BRINNON ! DIRECTIONS FROM RUILCENE, HEAD SOMWFST ON US-101 TOWARD SEE MILL RM, TURN LEFT ONTO HE MILL ROAD - VICINITY MAP POINT"�UvrgNEY s�°Fd�Y POINT NOT TO SCALE WHTTNEY ROAD 70 SITE, ENG. PROJECT NO. .JN:A633 18,- I„-.. PORTION OF: T26N,R1,W,S7 ...... DRAWN BY: D.HENNING,. _••.,•.•..•... REFERENCE NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION (ADDRESS): PROPOSED PROJECT: APPLICANT: POINT WHITNEY POINT WHITNEY WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE 1000 POINT WHITNEY ROAD ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT 600 CAPITOL WAY N. BRINNON, WA 98320 OLYMPIA, WA 98501-1091 IN: DABOB BAY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER: LAT/LONG: 47.45'42.03W/122.51'04.33W NEAR/AT: POINT WHITNEY 1. DATUM: TIDAL DATUM COUNTY: JEFFERSON 2 SHEET 1 OF 8 DATE:12/16/2019 STATE: WA (11481 VI� MAA70 REVI D SE DEC 17 2019 9 LEFFERSON ]DCD COUNTY N VERTICAL 11UNG BATTERED PfIENQ APPROX. I'. lw EDGE AT EIOTTO�� PNTj 2019 FOUND 2 1/2' ALUMINUM CAP MARKED 'GPS MU-W D.00 PT WHIT 2 2000- N: 284468.60 1-, 1143659.78 ELEV = 14.24 (TIDAL DATUM) BAY 1. �7 FIR 77 C114W Tti$ PICNIC 1:% + X- TABLE A-��L PNT# 150D FOUND 112 REBAR AND CAP (NO MARKINGS) POINT WP,17 3 M REBwl 4im. rAp N: 2a"11,9.40 E. 1144109A4 CONCRETE BOAT PMPl N: 284-467.44 E: 1143671.53 GRAVEL ELEV - 15.1.3 (TIDAL DATUM) ELEV 14.90 (TIDAL DATUM) VEGETATION LINE EDGE OF MLLW 0.00 PARKING LOT GUARD POSTS — GRAVEL 1 �ELSTO-' ROAD LOG WH P PILES LAGOON EDGE 6• CHAINLINK FENCE II EXI S'J�RODPITE PLAN SCALE: r ko I G" 25 75 SCALE., 1' = 100' APPRD? l3.2 GOA M'%: LINE MCC OF ASPHALT PA V, ENG. PROJECT NO. —1 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING c3.jj&jT,i54 REVISED ,DEC 17 2019 1EFFERSO,N COUNn Ul•r, N I/cenrar cu we NOTE: A SIGN WILL BE PLACED ON THE INTERPRETATIVE BOARD STATING THAT 'NO MOTOR VEHICLES ALLOWED ON THE BEACH. EMPTY BOAT TRAILERS ARE AUTHORIZED' DABOB BAY BATTERED PILING •� _ AFFROY. ! 01- AT1�N v Y'.::• AT BOTTOM. {._ 77 SSEE HEET MITIGATION PLAN �� _ = b ,�- �� ' • - 4-1 ---MHHW - 11.55 - - -- � - - _ _ = �� •tip' TEN WX FEKC~ _ ��'+-"`^-_ � '� �• . EDGE OF J~ -�^-�' • •. ,� "------.._ - - . - ,�6•� i-��- - .. PAR/I;.�- LOTu 7AYi! I G�i4RD h:Mi• -� 4 iG5T5 PILESiI TO - ; BE REMOVED -Z:�. _ -- LAGOON EDGE -- 4, PROPOSED SITE PLAN � SCALE: 1 - 100 0 SO 100 �5 5 -" SCALE: 1' = 100' ENG. PROJECT NO. JN'A633:18-1 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING REVISIED DEC 1 7 2019 TEFFERSON COUNTY DCI7 cy _ iAl�w 0.00 ` 4A$RB SA_Y INSTALL (28) ~ . 4'X72'X6� RAMP PLANKS TO -APPROX. - ELEVATION -2.0 (1584 SF) _ CONCRETE BOAT - RAMP TO REMAIN - ARTICULATED CONCRETE MAT ___ AND PLANKS A 1 - _- 2640 SF �- MHHW 11.55 r� N'AvY DEPARTMENT MONUMENT CORNCR N!/MBFR U.S.A. J5 5' BELOW G4AVEL SURFACE - ARTICULATED CONCRETE MAT (1056 SF) r' l IL \ r+ f A MP i N 1 CALF: 3 4 a :0 20 !0 —t3 45 SCALE: 1' = 30' REFI ERENCE ENG. PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY: D. HENNING I ,I I I ELEV. APPROX 1.B0 END OF EXISTING RAMP END OF NEW RAMP STA. = 1+59.BDf ELEV. APPROX. = .9.42 GRADE BREAK STA. = 1+14.04f INSTALL (28) 4'X12'X6' RAMP PLANKS TO APPROX. ELEVATION -2.0. f ELEV. - 15.69 BEGINNING OF NEW RAMP S7A. 0+50.003 ELEV. - 15.21 BEGINNING OF NEW ASPHALT FOR F=p INSTALL ENG. PROJECT NO. i,� EXISTING GROUND E! u 4 II ! FQ F -- EXFSr7NG. CONCRETE BOAT -� RAMP TO REMAIN .I I I I ,i I I i N O N O 111 N N _O I I 0 DEC 17 2019 COUNTYDCD r I ! I 1 I 1 1= t f 1 I O I I I I I lil >O i I I I t o l 0 1 I I I I C I I E ! I I 1 I 1 I I I I �- I — I _ I I I I 1= I o V l I I I I I 1 1 I I 0 I I C I I I I I C I I I I ! I I I I I I ! 1 3 I 1 I I o I 1 I l I I l I 00 I 16 I lb I Qm l m I M I ElfI EL I J l I I I Q I I I I I I I I I W I I I ! Q 0 1 I 1 I I Ld 1 N I Ld 1 m ! I- I I I ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C I lY I I I I I I I I I !E I LLj I I I I Iz I I I I 1 Iv I I I I ! I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I l a I I l a I 1 ¢ I I I I I I I I I I I I L---L__I__L_J I I I I REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: POINT WHITNEY ACCESS LocAT,oN: POINT WHITNEY DRAWN BY: D. HENNING SHEET 5 OF 8 DATE; 12/17/2019 i NJ �.p, , - 4 !I.' A� DEICI 9 ICI~FERSON COUNTY DC 4' x 12' x 6' PRECAST CONCRETE PLANKS _T�_-.�------� = _ ---�• �-�=�� wit-_�� zw _ w 6 _J-"-'-li` d 0'dl 0 s C] p 's Q a s O igtrt0I= �. �r' dd LiC7 st d o GC 1 Ct l I= e" DEPTH ARTICULATE D zw fir# d {I d t'" d _. IU C3 . d . CONCRETE MAT, _ - - 207 OPEN SPACE. a ED d CD d 0 C7 Q T O d.. d, © Cl� dtitr o e a yf a d - n �. i fl CC__7 d d Mi.D d[d s[[7 `� C; cm)i CD IL n �' o 1-p d d :,� o d El]1 T1 dr [ U ,.f[ I r •13] 1C U d 11 d ED . Top OF RAIAP p Lj k U_ [ V L.1 IfPECAL RAMP PLANK PLAN NOT TO SCALE FB,L ALL V= ■[R[ sy/' Claw pLCYit » Y1T, KEEP FLUSH WrTH FINISHED SURFACE SHALL TOP OF CONCRETE MATCH EXISnNC GRADE R,-D, T 2'-V RAMP PUVO6 - TYP - TYP BOTH SIDES z'YP Ex6TNG RAMP TO REMADE IV 17 • IV PRECAST CONCIiEIE vLuclS MWALIED ON TOP OF �J!' [TTEIAN RAID . A �� • Z� I-•j'r-' i �\/�� X. ATTAPi AAClgR UITI � LLL UID6TURBm - GEOTEMILE BLO[H 51FPPOR7 GROUNDTo GABIC ORATF ANCHOR TIGHT CAR E. RSUPPOIFF WOE PO CE r or I We AND *IS UAPM S MR www tot( USE I h EDED ONLY USE i xfTcOCO OMDL IX IF EDMT GRUS ca�lPAclm AMP PLAN A DT[Y iTSL' IF HEQXD Ey ROOK s s NOTE: SEE SITE PUMA FOR SIZE AND LAYOUT OF ARTICULATED CONCRETE MATS REFERENCE NUMBER; APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT LOCATION: POINT WHITNEY ENG. PROJECT NO. 3N:A633:81-1 SHEET 6 OF 8 DATE:12/16/2019 -tlwf m LDEC 0,�4lj NOTE: WATTLES TO BE PLACED / 2019 AROUND WORK AREA As NEEDED PER SHEET S. UUNT1 DcI N MATCH EXISTING -SOY ' PARKING AREA ----------------- ELEVATION OF RESTORATION L , • • M • ` + ` ` SET BY MATCHING THE TOP EDGE OF EX��{ + +. RELOCATED OF BEACH GRAVEL LOT 4X6 PICNIC GRAVEL/VEGETATION LINE----,,.,, [� � � . � ' . • . � TABLE FIRE PR TO .+ BE REMOVED �• _• _ I .90D SF L6 GRAVEL PARKING WnGATION AREA a AREA i EXCAVATE TO EXISTING ELEVATION , •y • . 20" BARRIER LOG SLOPE TRANSITION AT t `-�~_ •L CORNER. FILL REMOVAL SWILL NOT DISTURB ANY EXISTING RIP RAP 112' SECTION OF CHAINUNK FENCE-7- S• . uN# _ 1 TD BE REMOVED —FENCE � MHHW 11.57 MLLW 0.00 MITIGATION PLAN SCIU.E: I sa• SCALE: 1" 20' REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT NAME: WASHINGTON DEPT. of FISH & WILDLIFE PROPOSED PROJECT: ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT LOCATION: POINT WHITNEY ENG. PROJECT NO. JN:A833:18- 1 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING SHEET 7 OF 8 DATE: 12/ 1 6/201 J o; 1 B"-10" DIA. � 1' x 1' STACK STRAW WATTLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: 1. PREPARE THE SLOPE BEFORE THE WATTLING PROCEDURE IS STARTED. 2. SHALLOW GULLIES SHOULD BE SMOOTHED AS WORK PROGRESSES. 3. 010 SMALL TRENCHES ACROSS THE SLOPE ON CONTOUR, TO PLACE ROLLS IN. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENWJGH TO ACCOMMODATE HALF THE THICKNESS OF THE ROLL. WHEN THE SOIL 5 LOOSE AND UNCOMPACTED. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY THE ROLL 2/3 OF ITS THICKNESS BECAUSE THE GROUND WILL SETTLE. 4. IT IS CRITICAL THAT ROLLS ARE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO WATER MOVEMENT, PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE CONTOUR. 5. START BUILDING TRENCHES AND INSTALL ROLLS FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AND WORK UP. 6. CONSTRUCT TRENCHES AT CONTOUR INTERVALS OF 3-12 FEET APART DEPENDING ON STEEPNESS OF SLOPE. THE STEEPER THE SLOPE. THE CLOSER TOGETHER THE TRENCHES. 1:11=10' 2:1s20' 3:1=30' 4:1-40'. 7. LAY THE ROLL ALONG THE TRENCHES FITTING IT SNUGLY AGAINST THE SOIL. MAKE SURE NO GAPS EXIST BETWEEN THE SOIL AND THE STRAW WATTLE. B. USE A STRAIGHT BAR TO DRIVE HOLES THROUGH THE WATTLE AND INTO THE SOIL FOR THE WILLOW OR WOODEN STAKES. 9. DRIVE THE STAKE THROUGH PREPARED HOLE INTO SOIL. LEAVE ONLY 1 OR 2 INCHES OF STAKE EXPOSED ABOVE ROLL. 10. IF USING WILLOW STAKES REFER TO LIVE STAKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 11.INSTALL STARES AT LEW EVERY 4 FEET APART THROUGH THE WATTLE. ADDITIONAL STAKES WAY BE DRIVEN ON THE DOWNSLOPE SIDE OF THE TRENCHES ON HIGHLY EROSN"c OR VERY STEEP SLOPES. 12. INSPECT THE STRAW ROLLS AND THE SLOPES AFTER SIGNIFICANT STORMS. MAKE SURE THE ROLLS ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL. 13. REPAIR ANY RILLS OR GULLYS PROMPTLY. 14. RESEED OR REPLANT VEGETATION IF NECESSARY UNTIL THE SLOPE IS STABILIZED. REVISED DEC 17 2019 1 f F RSON COUNTY DCD ENG. PROJECT NO. JN DRAWN BY: D. HENNING LIM if P1zO- 0W31 ON �,� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6215heridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 f� + []• '' l Tek 360.379.4450 1 Fax: 360.379.4451 f J Web: www.co.iet`ferson.wa.uslcommunitydeyelopment E-mail: dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us NO!/ i7 S� I G`�0 Scan tine 4R oods to access the digital form. PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE Purpose The purpose of the pre -application process is to ensure consistency with the applicable sections of JCC Title 18. Process 1. Submit an application for a pre -application conference with the required items below. 2. Once submitted, staff will be assigned to the case, and they will coordinate with you on potential meeting dates. 3. Discuss project at meeting with all required departments. If necessary meeting will be held on site. 4. Receive written report from Jefferson County on process to move forward with project. 5. Submit all required applications for project; once approvals are issued, start projectl Required Submittal Items Pre -Application Conference Application Conceptual Design plan —see pg. 2 Permit Fees based on departments requested/required to attend for project type Qk w. Call far carekt remrJ List of everybody who will be Involved in the meeting and/or project K Attach any special reports already completed for the project/parcel The Jefferson County Code (JCC)18.40.090 & 18.25.640: When Required. Pre -application conterences are requires for all Type II, Type III, Type IV and Type V project applications and Type I project applications proposing impervious surfaces of 10,000 square feet or more and/or non -single-family structures of 5,000 square feet or more. Additionally, pre -application conferences are required for industrial, commercial, and critical area stewardship plan applications. The administrator may exercise discretion not to require a pre -application conference if the administrator determines that the conference information is self-evident, already transmitted, or would not add value to the subsequent application. Pre -application conferences for all other types of applications are optional, and requests for conferences will be considered by the administrator on a time -available basis. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not Include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre -application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: 1. A list of the requirements for a completed application; 2. A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; 3. The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and 4. A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of their duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. %�d 0\�, \212 , % 9� .10 , Wec>(pk \� V�%c6l � ) c c Wb Application Directions 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach one sketch of the Conceptual Design plan for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; d. Means of ingress and egress; e. Property/lot drainage, f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; g. Location of utility easements; and h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, asset forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. Applicant Name: Wo A I n Dept. &P Fish amd W11alde, - is p Mailing address: 1,R00 l Q 0 ftjn Telephone: 3o- email: Representative: y Mailing address: Telephone: email: representative: Telephone: email: Representative: Telephone: email: Representative: email: Include additional names on a separate sheet. Property Description General Location: r ¢jY - \A]1AtnLW Y Y Lvlvw V Q..t& J' Ace, - I W) Ply) r}L �/�jlrlL j Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): LOT 3 n 9-Digit Parcel Number. [C2Q i :)q 100 y Total Acreage: -7, 9 3 - Zone: Applicant: 19 Owner ❑ Contract Purchaser This is the % of your property that is covered by impervious % Lot Coverage: surface. ❑ Lessee ❑ Other G:1PemdtCenter\#WORMSOMRD\Pre-Applpe-app oonferenceform OR code.docx REV. M1512018 Page 2 Project Description (attach additional pages it necessary) --ffir � z.�- tin beOX,M r e."�hc ll rz t�e.l rc l,. h t� I �Oe*' ac'e& r e will b, ( Yl Yt a. 0 g ' m G� Standard Disclosure information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre -application consultation Is based on County regulations In effect at the time of the pre -application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre - application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later Inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. hereby designate conference. (Landowner signature) a9 ( fate) act as my agent in matters related to this pre -application (Date) OFFICE USE ONLY Pre -Application Conference Fees Land Use $470.00 Environmental Health — rfrequested/required to attend $214.00 Building — If requested/required to attend $94•00 Public Works — If requested/required to attend $132.00 Scan Fee $24.00 Site Visit —optional $188.00 Technology Fee — 5% Total Fees_ $ $ 5 10.10 Fees based on project and departments requested/required to attend. At Please coAl fDtr OreaA COYa fl&WIGJ!'1. - 0:1PermllCentiVA YFORMSIq OOM%Pre.APP%w app corftror a fon OR wdeAacx REV. M1512o19 Page 3 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN Please submit (or attach) a site map that graphically shows the required conceptual design items listed on page 2. 5ee aftc ied . G;%PemdtCafte PORMUMORDU'r&A We.W cardbmw form 0R oodeAom REV. 41f 6=1a Page 4 NOTE: WATTLES TO BE PLACED _ AROUND WORK AREA AS NEEDED PER SHEET 8. NOV 2 7 2019 N M _ YATdT E7tI5TfN6 PARKING AREA . • . • • • •�• • • • • ~ ELEVATION OF RESTORATION BY MATCHING THE TOP EDGE L LOT ' - RELOCATED OFTBEACH 1 . GRAVE4/VECEUTION LINE � " 08 PICNIC TABLE � - i. - - • FIRE PFT TO r BE REMOVED • } 1• . _ .OGD SFGRAVEL PARKING MITIGATION AREA - - AREA EXCAVATE TO EXISTING ` ELEVATION 20" BARRIER LOG SLOPE IPMSRIOH AT CORNER. FILL REMOVAL SHALL NOT DI5RAR0 ANY EX15RNG RIP RAP ~K FENCE_ : �= - 12' SECTION OF _ TO BECHAINLINFIEMOVED -F CFI IHLIUK MHHW 11.55� MLLW 0.00 SCALE: 1" - 20' 0 15 30 SCALE: 1" - 20' ENG. PROJECT NO. JN.A633.18-1 DRAWN ay, D. HENNING h, o; r r. 17 r rl i� • : r suGK r STRAW WATTLE DETAIL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: 1. PREPARE THE SLOPE BEFORE THE WATTLING PROCEDURE IS STARTED. 2 SHALLOW GULLIES SHOULD BE SMOOTHED AS WORK PROGRESSES. 3. DIG SMALL TRENCHES ACROSS THE SLOPE ON CONTOUR, TO PLACE ROLLS IN. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE HALF THE THICKNESS OF THE ROLL WHEN THE SOIL IS LOOSE AND UNCOMPACTED. THE TRENCH SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY THE ROLL 2/3 OF ITS THICKNESS BECAUSE THE GROUND WILL SETTLE 4. IT IS CRITICAL THAT ROLLS ARE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO WATER MOVEMENT, PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE CONTOUR. 5. START BUILDING TRENCHES AND INSTALL ROLLS FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AND WORK UP. 6. CONSTRUCT TRENCHES AT CONTOUR INTERVALS OF 3-12 FEET APART DEPENDING ON STEEPNESS OF SLOPE. THE STEEPER THE SLOPE, THE CLOSER TOGETHER THE TRENCHES. 1:1-10' 2:1-20' 3:1-30' 4:1-40' 7. LAY THE ROLL ALONG THE TRENCHES FTITING R SNUGLY AGAINST THE SOIL. MAKE SURE NO GAPS EXIST BETWEEN THE SOIL AND THE STRAW WATTLE B. USE A STRAIGHT BAR TO DRIVE HOLES THROUGH THE WATTLE AND INTO THE SOIL FOR THE WILLOW OR WOODEN STAKES. 9. DRIVE THE STAKE THROUGH PREPARED HOLE INTO SOIL LEAVE ONLY 1 OR 2 INCHES OF STAKE EXPOSED ABOVE ROLL 10. IF USING WILLOW STAKES REFER TO LIVE STAK NG BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 11. INSTALL STAKES AT LEAST EVERY 4 FEET APART THROUGH THE WATTLE. ADDITIONAL STAKES MAY BE DRIVEN ON THE DOWNSLOPE SIDE OF THE TRENCHES ON HIGHLY EROSIVE OR VERY STEEP SLOPES. 12. INSPECT THE STRAW ROLLS AND THE SLOPES AFTER SIGNIFICANT STORMS. MAKE SURE THE ROLLS ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL 13. REPAIR ANY RILS OR GULLYS PROMPTLY. 14. RESEED DR REPLANT VEGETATION IF NECESSARY UNTIL THE SLOPE IS STABIUZED. ENG. PROJECT NO. JN:A533:1 8-1 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING —WR:irT9V;NP 'ON J.mrUd '9N3 maw A 31 Ala Mall. 51 31M IWYI MR" 3WA Lad" )=a OL01 3l I%3um dAL f 11 •. .rme roe eo dU 1a air armd +�aa•a seas woa dA1 - 3 du - S*Ffw +m J yaps a Huu IAts asraens aalsrai vAdM au ^ VAYaD rrma svw rn Tud TU '30VdS N 'lYYI 3 031 SM 313W= OR IMUMV 3O InOAYI ONV WIS 803 NVId 3115 33S MOR 9 59 v NN`dld dMIN rDUYMwn olrr oxfT/hi1 ■Ou srnt OWa a3mivaaln aasm v - y4u MKOW mcm A 7sn Ala ailL O .v 3WW r �ryy s a�IPa rlal ,►/1 1 b .7r 3S/Id klddL r`f kN'wI nun ns )l S70'3l Ok r �� 31M MON91ie' 1L7CAiY 1 NIMdtl O1 d. 'JNIISnO � du 3lVOS Ol ION NYId d d rM I 6LOZ/CZ/C0:31V0 $ d0 g 133HS A3NDHM 1NIOd :NOI.LVOOI SS300V A3NAHM 1NIOd :immd 03SOdONd 33114IIM V HSid 10 '1d3C NOIJNIHSdM :3L4VN LNVOIlddV :838mm 33N3NIM I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I r-T--r--I I I I I I i I I I I I I I gl I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I i I E I C I I I I 1 I I I NI I m l I I D I I I 1= 1 Z I rn I I i I I I _�•__I__ I N I � i o I E m cF, O I 1 I r l i v I ! ! I I I I I ! = 1 1 I I I f l I I I I I I L-1--I---I I I I I I f I I I n l I I i I S I I I I I 1 ! I 10 1 I I i I C I I I I v I I 1 I I I 1 I I rp I I I I I I I I I I I I JNINNN -0 .AS NM`NC I U O N O N O N O UD X O a 5..; 5.36 t 3.03 *ON 133f08d •ON3 '-17Yi5Hl d►I►ra M03 1lYHdSY M3N 30 �NINNI'J38 LZ'SL •A313 � YLS dM 9 !O 00'OS+O ONINNIO39 69'SL - AM NOUMTS .- •xoaadr 01 SxNVId dM ep9X,ZLx,4 (9Z) 11V19N1 Ii :F4o•4 L+L a NIS xV388 30V80 ZYS - •xOaddV 'A313 dRVS M3N 30 ON3 drM 9NUSIX3 d0 ON3 OB"L a XOV&N . AM III :� II III i I I I O N G N NO tl� O N I NOV 2 7 poi �r —.SEE MRIGATION PLAN. SHEET 9 l MLLW O.OD EDGE OF PARKING LOT —' lENG. PROJECT NO. JN-.A633:1 8-1 NOTE A SIGN WILL BE PLACED ON THE INTERPRETATIVE BOARD STATING THAT 'NO MOTOR VEHICLES ALLOWED ON THE BEACH. EMPTY BOAT TRAILERS ARE AUTHORIZED' vE7mGu PxInG .. ` • �i' !:`� - pABOB BAY QRTTEREO P71_+Nc' .. ; �� . ��, • �:. -�- _ � ... � _ APPROX LOCATION •i+-�:=r'.• - - ' �ti EEA O EDGE AT BOTTOM zz �. r r'. _- �It LAGOON EDGE—. �r'i �� +fif• PROPOSEp-51TE PLAN SCALE: 1' SCALE: 1' - 100' DRAWN BY: D. HENNING APPROX. YEGEFAi1�pT LINE i N I -TLLW 0.00 ,- CONCRETE BOAT RAMP TO REMAIN MHHW 11 mi, NAVY OEPARTMENT MONUMENT CORNER NUMBER U.S.N. J5 5" BELOW GRAVEL SURFACE -4- W&T y fiMP SRE PLAN 4 SCALE, I" = :50, RFFMFrNt;r DMOS INSTALL (33) 47f12'x6' RAMP . . . . . . . PLANKS TO APPROX. ELEVATION -2.0 (1584 SF) ARTICULATED CONCRETE MAT AND PLANKS _Z640 SF L ARTICULATED CNCRETE MAT (1O056 SF) _4 ENG. PROJECT NO. DRAWN ey. D. HENNING PT WHITNEY PROJECT LOCATII IV NOV 27 2019 i ENG. PROJECT NO. AN .:Au3 .8,- 1 REFERENCE NUMBER: APPLICANT: WASHINGTON DEFT. of FISH & WILDLIFE 600 CAPITOL WAY N. OLYMPIA. WA 98501-1091 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER: 1. 2 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCA STATE MAP NOT TO SCALE CT1ONS FROM QUILCENE. HEAD SOUTHWEST ON US-101 TOWARD BEE MILL ROAD. TURN LEFT ONTO BEE MILL ROAD. CONTWUE ON BEE MILL ROAD TO POINT WHITNEY ROAD. FOLLOW POINT WHITNEY ROAD TO SITE. PORTION oF:.T26N,R1,W,S7 DRAWN BY: D.HENNING .................................... PROJECT LOCATION (ADDRESS): PROPOSED PROJECT: POINT WHITNEY POINT WHITNEY 1000 POINT WHITNEY ROAD ACCESS REDEVELOPMENT BRINNON, WA 98320 IN: DABOB BAY LAT/LONG: 47.45'42.03W/122.51'04.33W NEAR/AT: POINT WHITNEY DATUM: TIDAL DATUM COUNTY: JEFFERSON SHEET 1 OF 8 DATE:03/27/2019 STATE: WA II NVERnCA< PRIND BATTERED PI APPROX. EDGE AT BOTTOM ....F.......•.'.. `—+. PNT/ 2D19 FOUND 2 1/2': MLLW 0.00 ALUMINUM CAP MARKED 'GPS - PT WHIT 2 2D00' : - " •��: .::. .: •.'�.�:�....._.:'. N: 284458.60 E: 1143859.78:� ELEV - 14.24 (TIDAL DATUM) �` eri"i ....... : r � .. -16 '':_ - — --- _ Y DABOB BAY �... FIRE PIT -� - _ - _ . � ` �'-•;��5�+. I •� -� ~ OHW = 11.5 r5 S^� PICNIC TABLE�S• .yr� CONDft BOAT RAMP `PNTN 1500 FOUND 1/2" REBAR 60ATTRDL POH INI�Wr� - `� `► • = �-AND CAP (No 1aARKwn) REEHR W/ o N: 284467.44 E: 1143671453 1k 28"18.46 E: 1144109.84 _ GRAVEL ELIN - 15.13 (TIDAL DATUM) ELEV = 14.90 (TIDAL DATt1M], APPROX. 13.2' VEGETATION LINE VEGETATION LINEEDGE OF EDGE OF 1� 1 J ASPHALT MLLW 0.01) PARKING LOT ] GUARD PAVEMENT 7�.VLL' PD 0jam- R0AD j LOG WHEELSTOP� I LAGOON Jp CaL tt EDGE iw+r TOr�l. SI F�3s 40 B' CHAINUNK �. FENCE I I 6MFING SITE PLAN O 50 lj7p 25 SCALE: 1" - 100' ENG. PROJECT NO. JN;6633:18-1 DRAWN BY: D. HENNING