HomeMy WebLinkAboutArticle I & II Mod. Auth. & Admin 01-06-26Chapter 18.22
CRITICAL AREAS
Sections:
Article I. Authority, Purpose, and Intent
18.22.100 Authority.
18.22.110 Purpose.
18.22.120 Intent and construction of chapter.
Article II. Administrative Requirements
18.22.200 Applicability.
18.22.210 Identification and mapping of critical areas.
18.22.220 Critical area review process.
18.22.230 General exemptions.
18.22.240 Nonconforming uses and structures.
18.22.250 Variance, types and criteria.
18.22.260 Reasonable economic use exceptions.
18.22.270 Buffers physical separated and functionally isolated.
18.22.280 Adaptive management.
Article III. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas
18.22.300 Purpose.
18.22.310 Classification/designation.
18.22.320 Applicability.
18.22.330 Protection standards.
Article IV. Frequently Flooded Areas
18.22.400 Purpose.
18.22.410 Classification and designation.
18.22.420 Applicability.
18.22.430 Protection standards – Incorporation by reference of chapter 15.15 JCC and
additional requirements.
Article V. Geologically Hazardous Areas
18.22.500 Purpose.
18.22.510 Classification/designation.
18.22.520 Applicability.
18.22.530 Protection standards.
Article VI. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA))
18.22.600 Purpose.
18.22.610 Classification and designation.
18.22.620 Applicability
18.22.630 Protection standards.
18.22.640 Impact assessment and mitigation.
Article VII. Wetlands
18.22.700 Purpose.
18.22.710 Classification and designation.
18.22.720 Applicability.
18.22.730 Protection standards.
18.22.740 Impact assessment and mitigation.
Article VIII. Agriculture
18.22.800 Purpose and intent.
18.22.810 Resource concerns.
18.22.820 Applicability and classification.
18.22.830 Protection standards.
18.22.840 Monitoring and adaptive management.
18.22.850 Compliance.
18.22.860 Limited public disclosure.
Article IX. Special Reports
18.22.900 Purpose.
18.22.905 General requirements.
18.22.910 Waivers.
18.22.915 Retaining consultants.
18.22.920 Acceptance of special reports.
18.22.930 Critical aquifer recharge area reports.
18.22.940 Frequently flooded area reports.
18.22.945 Geologically hazardous area reports.
18.22.950 Habitat management reports.
18.22.955 Process and requirements for designating habitats of local importance as critical
areas.
18.22.960 Wetland reports.
18.22.965 Critical area stewardship plan reports.
Article I. Authority, Purpose, and Intent
18.22.100 Authority.
This chapter is adopted under the authority of Article XI, section 11 of the Washington State
Constitution, chapter 36.70A RCW, the Growth Management Act, which requires a county to
enact a critical area ordinance and provide for its administration, enforcement and amendment .
[Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx. A)]
18.22.110 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to adopt development regulations that protect critical areas that are
required to be designated under RCW 36.70A.170, part of the Growth Management Act (chapter
36.70A RCW), including the requirement to follow best available science. [Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx.
A)]
18.22.120 Liberal Construction.
This chapter and all proceedings under it shall be liberally construed with a view to affect its
purpose and intent. [Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx. A)]
Article II. Administrative Provisions
18.22.200 Applicability, Conflicts with other provision of this code and Requests.
(1) This chapter applies to any development, land disturbing activity or use located within or
containing a critical area or its associated buffer in Jefferson County.
(2) Jefferson County shall not issue any permit or other approval to alter a critical area or its
associated buffer without compliance with all of the requirements of this chapter.
(3) Land disturbing activity, development, or use located within or containing a critical area or
its associated buffer is prohibited without full compliance with all of the requirements of this
chapter.
(4) Land-disturbing activities in critical areas or their associated buffers are prohibited without
first obtaining all applicable permits.
(5) When one type of critical area or its associated buffer adjoins or overlaps another type of critical
area or its associated buffer, the wider, more restrictive protective standard shall apply.
(6) When any provision of this chapter is in conflict with any other section of the Code, the
provision of the Code that provides most protection to the critical area shall apply.
(7) Any critical area occurring within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act also shall
follow the requirements in chapter 18.25 JCC.
(8) Compliance with this chapter shall not constitute a defense for failing to comply with any other
applicable federal, state, or local regulations.
(9) The requirements of this chapter shall apply concurrently with review conducted under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (chapter 43.21C RCW), as locally adopted in chapter
18.40 JCC. Any conditions required pursuant to this chapter shall be coordinated with the SEPA
review and threshold determination.
(10) This chapter applies to every forest practice over which Jefferson County has jurisdiction
under chapter 76.09 RCW, title 222 WAC, and conversion of lands to non-forestry use
section18.20.160 JCC. [Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx. A)]
Commented [GB1]: WDFW 12/16/25- change made
18.22.210 Identification and mapping of critical areas.
(1) The approximate location and extent of critical areas within the County are displayed on
various inventory maps available on the Jefferson County geographic information system (GIS)
web site. Critical area maps periodically shall be revised, modified, and updated to reflect current
information.
(2) The critical areas maps are provided only as a general guide to alert the viewer to the possible
location and extent of critical areas. Critical areas maps shall not be relied upon exclusively to
establish the existence, or absence or boundaries of a critical area, or to establish whether all of
the elements necessary to identify an area as a critical area actually exist.
(3) The type, extent and boundaries of critical areas may be approved by the administrator based
on county records, field data, or presented in Special Reports that meet all of the requirements of
Article IX for a type of critical area. In the event of a conflict between a critical area location
shown on the county’s maps and that of the administrator determination, the administrator’s
determination shall prevail. shall prevail over an inconsistent critical area location shown on the
County’s maps.
(4) To the extent practicable, the County shall ensure that its critical area maps are updated as
inventories are completed in compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act
(chapter 36.70A RCW). [Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx. A)]
18.22.220 Critical area review process.
(1) A Site Development Review outlined in section 18.40.420 to 480 JCC is required for all permits
for development or land disturbing activity. If the development entails complex issues that require
additional input from DCD, the applicant may request an optional pre-application conference per
section 18.40.090 JCC. The purpose of a pre-application conference is to discuss shoreline and
applicable critical area requirements, to review any conceptual site plans prepared by the applicant
and to identify potential impacts and mitigation measures. A pre-application conference shall be
for the convenience of the applicant,and may be conducted on-site, if agreed upon by the applicant
and DCD. Any recommendations from the pre-application conference shall not be binding on the
applicant or the County.
(2) The department shall perform a critical area review for any development application. Reviews
for multiple critical areas shall occur concurrently. For a critical area within shoreline jurisdiction,
critical area review shall occur as part of the shoreline review process.
(3) To provide a timely and coordinated review process, to the extent reasonably possible, DCD
shall consolidate the processing of permits issued by County departments that affect critical areas
with the other development permits, as allowed outline in optional consolidated permit processing
outlined in section 18.40.030(2) JCC.
(4) DCD shall review all applications for development, land disturbing activity or a use submitted
to:
(a) Confirm the nature and type of the critical area;
Commented [GB2]: Joe Holtrop, JC Conservation District
12/16/25 – change made
Commented [GB3]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – change made
(b) Evaluate any required assessments, reports, or studies;
(c) Determine whether the development application is consistent with this chapter;
(d) Determine whether any additional information is needed to process the development
application; and,
(e) Determine if the mitigation and monitoring plans proposed by the applicant are sufficient
to protect the critical area and associated buffer as well as public health, safety, and welfare
consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this chapter.
(5) If development has the potential to impact a critical area or its associated buffer, the
administrator may require a special report to ensure the protection requirements of this chapter are
met. Critical area special reports are subject to all of the following requirements:
(a) The applicant shall submit a special report when required by this chapter;
(b) The report shall be evaluated by DCD to determine if all potential impacts to the critical
area or associated buffer have been addressed in the special report;
(c) DCD shall review the impacts of the proposed development for compliance with mitigation
requirements (as defined in JCC 18.10.130) to determine if the mitigation plan sufficiently
addresses the potential impacts; and
(d) Ensure that the submittal for the critical area is consistent with other documentation
submitted as part of the development application and requirements for a complete application
in chapter 18.40 JCC.
(6) At every stage of the development review process, the burden of demonstrating that a
development is consistent with this chapter is upon the applicant. [Ord. 5-20 § 2 (Appx. A)]
(7) Compliance with this chapter and permit conditions shall be required for any permit issued by
DCD. A final building certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until the mitigation proposal
has been implemented per the approved mitigation plan and building permit conditions. Other
development and stand-alone critical area review shall be required to ensure the mitigation
proposal was properly implemented and all permit conditions pertaining to critical areas and
buffers have been followed prior to any land use disturbance or use of the property. An approved
stand-alone critical areas review shall be completed to satisfy the requirements of this chapter.
18.22.230 Exemptions from all types of critical area requirements.
(1) Requirement for frequently flooded areas. Any development or land disturbing activity
proposed within frequently flooded areas (i.e., 100-year floodplains or floodway) shall also require
a flood permit application to be submitted to DCD. This requirement applies to the proposed
exemptions listed in subsection (3) of this section.
Commented [GB4]: WDFW 12/16/25- DCD updated
Flood Damage Protection Ord. on 11/18/24. FIRM maps updated in 2018. Comment noted - no change made
(2) It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient information for the administrator
to determine that one of the exemptions listed in subsection (4) of this section applies.
(3) The following activities in a critical area or its associated buffer are exempt when in compliance
with all of the requirements in this section, including those additional requirements in this
subsection:
(a) Agricultural activities. Agricultural activities are defined in Section 18.10.010 JCC.
Although the definition of existing and on-going agriculture is also found in Section 18.10.010
JCC, this definition is utilized for the administration of the performance standard for
Agricultural activities and accessory uses found in Section 18.20.030, and is not utilized in
Chapter 18.22 JCC per this definition.Existing and on-going a
With the exception of new agricultural activities, existing and on-going agricultural activities,
as defined in JCC 18.10.010, are exempt and may continue in substantially the same manner;
provided, the agricultural activitiesy does not result in additional adverse impacts to a critical
area or its associated buffer. This exemption shall include maintenance and repair of lawfully
established structures, infrastructure, drainage and irrigation ditches systems, and farm ponds;
provided, maintenance work does not expand further into a critical area.
(b) Forest practice activities. Classes I, II, III, and IV special (not Class IV general conversions
or conversion option harvest plans) in accordance with the provisions of chapter 76.09 RCW
and forest practice regulations, title 222 WAC are exempt, except where the lands have been
or are proposed to be converted to a use other than commercial forest product production;
(c) Transportation activities maintenance or reconstruction. Maintenance or reconstruction of
existing public or private roads, paths, bicycle ways, trails, and bridges are exempt.
(d) On-site sewage system activities. Maintenance or reconstruction of on-site sewage systems
are exempt. The expansion or reconstruction of an on-site sewage system shall not further
encroach upon a shoreline and critical area its associated buffers without obtaining written
authorization or a permit from DCD.
(e) Drainage facilities or flood control structure maintenance or repair activities. Maintenance
or repair of existing drainage facilities or systems and flood control structures are exempt.
This includes but is not limited to, ditches (that do not meet the criteria for being designated
FWHCA or wetlands), culverts, catch basins, levees, reservoirs, and outfalls.
(f) Utilities activities. The utility activities listed below are exempt, provided:
(i) Normal and routine maintenance or repair of existing utility facilities or rights-of-way;
or,
(ii) Installation, construction, relocation and replacement, operation, repair, or alteration
of all utility lines, equipment, or appurtenances, not including substations, in improved
road rights-of-way;
(g) Reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance of structures activities. Reconstruction,
remodeling, or maintenance of structures activities are exempt, provided:
Commented [GB5]: Al Latham, JC Conservation District
Board 12/23/25 changes made
(i) Reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance of existing structures shall be within the
footprint of an existing lawfully established structure; and,
(ii) Work areas shall be minimized to the fullest extent possible, restored to previous
conditions as soon as construction is complete, and staging areas are located outside of
critical areas and their associated buffers.
This exemption shall not apply if the activity creates or continues a circumstance where
personal or property damage is likely is due to conditions of the critical area or if there is
further intrusion into a critical area or its associated buffer.
(h) Site investigative activities. Site investigative activities in wetlands, landslide hazard areas,
riverine and coastal erosion hazard areas, or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, or
their associated buffers that is necessary for development application submittals or permit
compliance, including but not limited to groundwater monitoring wells, sediment sampling,
surveys, soil borings, shallow soil test pits, and percolation tests that involve no filling of land
or use of heavy equipment and excavation for soil logs or percolation tests. Site investigation
activities that involve excavated areas are required to be filled unless waived by the
administrator;
(i) Emergency activities. Activities necessary to resolve or prevent imminent threat or danger
to public health or safety, or to public or private property, or serious environmental
degradation are exempt; provided:
(A) The nature of the emergency requires immediate action within a time period too short
to allow full compliance with this chapter;
(B) DCD, as well as any federal or state agencies with jurisdiction (e.g., the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers), have been notified of the emergency action within one working day
of the initiation of the emergency action;
(C) Any person undertaking emergency action using this exemption shall submit a
complete application to department for review and approval within 30 days of abatement
of the emergency, and the after-the-fact application shall show compliance with all
requirements of this chapter;
(D) Any impacts to critical areas or their associated buffers from the emergency activities
that are not mitigated within one year of issuance of an “after-the-fact” permit shall be in
violation of this exemption and subject to enforcement under title 19 JCC;
(j) Artificial wetlands and artificial ponds. Artificial wetlands and artificial ponds activities
(including maintenance) are exempt if all of the following requirements are met:
(i) The artificial wetland or pond does not meet the definition of wetland or a FWHCA;
and,
(ii) The artificial wetland or pond was not constructed from a wetland or a FWHCA or
was legally constructed from a wetland or a FWHCA by(without receiving all applicable
permits to modify the critical area);
Commented [GB6]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – change made
Commented [GB7]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – change made
(k) Irrigation. Operation, maintenance and repair of dikes, ditches, reservoirs, ponds and other
irrigation structures and facilities that do not require a state hydraulic permit and do not meet
the criteria for being designated as a FWHCA or wetlands;
(l) Recreational uses without any adverse impact to a critical area. Recreational uses that do
not cause any adverse impact to a critical area is exempt. Examples include, but are not limited
to, such recreational uses as swimming, canoeing, kayaking, hunting, and fishing (pursuant to
state law), bird watching, hiking, and bicycling. However, this exemption shall not apply to
recreational uses that meet the definition of development;
(m) Existing residential landscaping (typically non-native vegetation), including planting,
irrigating, mowing, pruning, and maintenance and repair of landscaping structures are exempt;
provided, these activities are part of existing residential landscaping activities and no building
permit is required. This exemption does not allow any additional intrusion, expansion, or
installation of non-native species into a critical area or its associated buffer;
(n) Noxious weed control. Removal or eradication of noxious weeds listed in chapter 16-750
WAC; provided, thethat all of the following conditions are met:
(i) The removal or control of noxious weeds shall follow guidelines issued by the Jefferson
County Noxious Weed Control Board, or other agencies with expertise;
(ii) The Jefferson County Noxious Weed Control Board, or other agencies with expertise
shall coordinate with DCD for the control of noxious weeds in wetlands; and,
(iii) The application of all herbicide in aquatic environments shall conform to the rules of
the Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of
Agriculture and Washington State Department of Natural Resources, pursuant to chapters
16-228, 173-201a, and 222-38 WAC;
(o) Harvesting of wild crops. Harvesting wild crops as defined in 7 C.F.R § 205.2 is exempt;
provided, that the harvesting:
(i) Is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops;
(ii) Does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or changing existing topography, water
conditions, or water sources; and,
(iii) Does not have any adverse impacts on protection of the critical area or its associated
buffer;
(p) Native vegetation enhancement. The enhancement of a critical area or its associated buffer
by the removal of invasive plants by hand held machinery and the planting native vegetation
is exempt. Invasive plants include those listed inby the Jefferson County Noxious Weed Board
and/or Washington State University Extension invasive forest weed resources. Examples of
invasive species include: (i.e. Butterfly Bbush, English Hholly, English Iivy, Herb-Robert,
Himalayan Bblackberry, English holly, Tansy Rragwort, Shiny Geranium, etc.) or as
determined by qualified agency or a qualified professional, and approved by the administrator.
Commented [GB8]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – change made
Commented [GB9]: Mike Schultz, PC Member made
12/10/25
(q) Pruning and Tree removal within FWHCA, wetlands and moderate or high landslide areas
may occur if ecological functions and values are not impacted, complies with this standard,
complies with the provisions of this Title, or is authorized by DCD. within FWHCA, wetlands,
and moderate or high landslide hazardous areas or their associated buffers :
Pruning/Tree Trimming:
(i) Pruning. Minor pruning of trees that does not exceed 25% of the live crown, and does
not include the topping of trees does not require approval from DCD. Pruning of trees
that exceeds this standard may require a tree removal permit and/or an arborist report
submitted to DCD for review and approval.
Tree Removal: DCD may require for all tree removal within FWHCA, wetlands, and
moderate or high landslide hazardous areas or their associated buffers the following:
(ii) A tree removal permit for the removal of trees over 6 inch in diameter or removal of
over 50% of the live crown
(iii) A special report from a certified arborist to determine if the tree is dead, diseased or
a threat to habitable or accessory structures, or where people congregate;
(iiiiv). A habitat management plan or a mitigation plan;
(ivv) . A restoration plan to ensure that there is adequate native tree or native shrub cover
in areas where a tree or trees are removed. Retention of snags are encouraged if they do
not pose a threat to life or property;
(vi) If tree removal is proposed in a moderate or high landslide hazard landslide hazard
area, DCD may require a geotechnical report if tree removal could destabilize the slope;
(vii) For tree removal in Shoreline Jurisdiction see also JCC 18.25.310(2)(c)(i)&(ii) and
JCC 18.25.310(2)(d)(iii),(iv)&(vii).
(r) New Trails. The construction of new, unpaved, nonmotorized trails when located in the
outer 25 percent of a wetland or a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or their critical
area buffers; provided, the new trail is no wider than three feet. This exemption shall not apply
Shoreline Jurisdiction, frequently flooded, where development must follow FEMA
requirements, or for new public use trails within a moderate or high landslide hazard area.
(s) Beaver dam alterations with a hydraulic project approval. Beaver dam alterations in stream
channels when undertaken with a hydraulic project approval issued by the Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife pursuant to chapter 77.55 RCW and chapter 220-660 WAC
are exempt.
(4) Application for exemption. An application for an exemption shall contain all of the following:
(a) Prior to the start of the development, land disturbing activity or use for which an exemption
is sought, the applicant shall submit to DCD a written description of the development, land
disturbing activity or use that includes all of the following information:
Commented [GB10]: WDFW 12/16/25- change made
Commented [GB11]: WDFW 12/16/25- made comment in section 18.22.630(5)(a)(iii) about minor pruning in FWHCA.
DCD addressed their comments in the exemptions section
for tree removal by adding pruning/tree trimming to this
section since it applies also to geohazard and wetlands
sections. Change made
Commented [GB12]: WDFW 12/16/25 – added retention
of old and damaged trees (snags) when safe – change made
(i) Type, timing, frequency, and sequence of the development, land disturbing activity or
use to be conducted;
(ii) Type of equipment to be used (hand or mechanical);
(iii) What activity the equipment will be used to perform;
(iv) How the development, land use activity or use avoids further alterations, impacts, or
encroachment upon the critical area and its associated buffer;
(v) Measures to be implemented to avoid impacts to critical area and its associated buffer
functions;
(vi) Why no other reasonable or practicable alternative exists to achieve the applicant’s
desired objective; and;
(vii) Best management practices to be used.
(viii) Other information as determined by DCD to make this determination.
(5) Five-year length of an approved application for an exemption. An approved application for
an exemption shall be valid for five years; provided, there is no significant change in the type or
extent of the development, land disturbing activity or use. Once the development or use is
completed, it can be continued. However, any other development, land disturbing activity or use
shall require additional review by DCD the development.
(6) Limitations on exemptions. All exemptions are subject to all of the following limitations:
(b) The development, land use activity or use shall not alter, impact, or encroach upon critical
areas or critical area buffers and no reasonable or practicable alternative exists;
(c) The development, land disturbing activity or use shall not affect the functions of a critical
area or a critical area buffer, and no reasonable or practicable alternative exists to achieve the
applicant’s desired objective;
(d) Best management practices shall be implemented to minimize impacts to critical areas and
their associated buffer s during the activity;
(e) Disturbed critical areas and their associated buffers shall be restored immediately after the
activity is complete; and,
(f) Any impacts of the development, land disturbing activity or use to a critical area or its
associated buffer shall be mitigated, as approved by the administrator.
(7) Authority of the administrator. The administrator may:
(a) Request additional information, from an applicant to ensure compliance with exemption
requirements, including special reports listed in Article IX of this chapter;
(b) Determine whether an application for an exemption meets the all the requirements for the
exemption;
Commented [GB13]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – further
Commented [GB14]: Joe Holtrop, 12/16/25 – further
(c) Determine that the development, land disturbing activity or use is closely allied or similar
to any activity in the list in subsection (7) of this section, even if the proposed activity does
not meet the precise terms of an activity listed as exempt in subsection (7) of this section;
provided the activity does not impact the functions and values of any critical area or its
associated buffer; and
(d) Take enforcement action under title 19 JCC for any development, land disturbing activity
or use located within or containing a critical area or its associated buffer that does not meet
exemption requirements.
The decisions in subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection are Type I land use decisions under
JCC 18.40.040.
18.22.240 Nonconforming uses and structures.
(1) Any legal use or legal structure in existence on the effective date of this chapter that does not
meet the critical area or its associated buffer shall be considered a legal nonconforming use.
(2) Applicants who prove to the satisfaction of the administrator that the use or structure was legal
prior to the effective date of this chapter may continue.
(3) A legal nonconforming use or structure may be maintained or repaired as allowed by this
chapter. This may include meeting the provisions of JCC 18.20.260.
(4) A legal nonconforming use or structure that has been damaged or destroyed may be restored
to a lawfully established prior condition and the immediately previous use may be resumed in
accordance with nonconforming provisions of JCC 18.20.260.
(5) Nonconforming uses and structures in a critical area or its associated buffer that are under the
jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act shall follow JCC 18.25.660 (Nonconforming
development).
18.22.250 Buffer variance types and criteria.
(1) Applications for a variance shall be made on forms approved by the administrator and shall
contain all of the information required in JCC 18.40.100 and in this subsection (1):
(a) All applications for a variance shall include a restoration plan, habitat management plan
or mitigation plan consistent with the provisions of Article IX Special Reports of this
chapter. The application for a variance shall be processed pursuant to chapter 18.40 JCC
(Application and Review Procedures).
(b) Applications for a variance under this section may be pursued only if buffer averaging
is not feasible. Buffer averaging is not considered a variance.
(c) Applications for a Type I Administrative variance or a Type III critical area
variance shall satisfy all of the requirements in subsection (2) of this section.
(2) Variance criteria
Commented [GB15]: WDFW 12/16/25 – Change made
Prior to the granting of a variance, the applicant shall demonstrate that all of the following criteria
have been met:
(a) Failure to grant the variance would result in an extraordinary hardship to the applicant;
(b) The extraordinary hardship to the applicant is specifically related to the property, and
is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and
the application of this chapter, and is not, for example, from deed restrictions or the
applicant’s own actions;
(c) The variance is justified to cure a special circumstance and not simply for the economic
convenience of the applicant and no other practicable or reasonable alternative exists;
(d) The granting of the variance shall not be materially detrimental to the critical area,
public health, safety, welfare, use or interest; or injurious to the property or improvements
in the vicinity;
(e) The granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to afford relief to accommodate
a use allowed under the Comprehensive Plan, chapter 18.45 JCC, Land Use Districts,
chapter 18.15 JCC, Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program (SMP), chapter 18.25 JCC,
or other applicable provisions of the Code;
(f) The granting of the variance shall not materially compromise the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, the Code, or be inconsistent with title 18 JCC.
Proposal that do not meet the variance criteria may submit a reasonable economic use
exception or a critical area stewardship plan (CASP).
18.22.260 Reasonable economic use exceptions.
Except when application of this chapter would deny all reasonable use of the property, an
applicant who seeks an exception from the standards and requirements of this chapter shall
pursue relief by means of a variance as provided for in this chapter. Any reasonable use
authorized under this section shall also be an allowed or conditional land use as specified by
chapter Section 18.15 land use districts. If the application of this chapter would deny reasonable
use of the property, or would otherwise constitute a taking under either the State or federal
constitution, the applicant may apply for a reasonable use exception pursuant to this subsection:
(1) An application for a critical area reasonable use exception shall be filed with the
Administrator and shall be considered by the Hearing Examiner as a Type III permit pursuant to
Chapter 18.40 JCC. The applicant may apply for a reasonable use exception without first
applying for a variance if the requested exception would provide relief from standards for which
a variance cannot be granted under this chapter (i.e. exceeds the maximum reduction permitted in
each of the critical area protection standards). The property owner and/or applicant for a
reasonable use exception have the burden of proving that the property is deprived of all
reasonable uses.
(2) Even though a variance application is not required, a reasonable use exception is a type of
variance and shall meet the variance criteria found in Section 18.22.250 JCC to the maximum
extent possible. In addition, approval of a reasonable use exception requires consistency with all
of the following criteria listed in subsections (a) through (f) of this section. Demonstration of
consistency is burdened upon the applicant:
(a) The applicant shall submit reports documenting the location of all the critical areas and their
associated buffers. This information shall be identified on a site map to scale.
(b)Application of this chapter would deny all reasonable use of the property; and
(c) There is no other reasonable or practicable use with less impact on the critical area; and
(d) The proposed development does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety
or welfare on or off the development proposal site; and
(e) The proposed development is consistent with the general purposes of this chapter and the
public interest, and does not conflict with applicable State and federal laws; and
(f) The proposed alterations to regulated critical areas are the minimum necessary to allow for
reasonable use of the property.
(3) Any authorized alteration of a critical area under this section may be subject to conditions
established by Jefferson County and may require mitigation under an approved mitigation plan
pursuant to Article IX Special Report of this chapter.
18.22.270 Buffers physically separated and functionally isolated.
(1) Critical area buffers that are both physically separated and functionally isolated from a critical
area and do not protect the critical area from adverse impacts shall be excluded from critical areas
requirements of this chapter. Physical separated and functional isolation can occur due to
anthropogenic physical conditions such as an existing impervious public road, or structures of
sufficient size to eliminate buffer functions, vertical separating, or any other relevant physical
characteristic. The administrator shall evaluate whether the interruption affects the entirety of the
buffer. Individual structures that do not fully interrupt all ecological functions and values or
protective measures provided by the buffer functions shall be limited in scope to just the portion
of the buffer that is affected.
(2) Functional isolation shall be limited to landslide hazard, wetland and FWHCA, and their
associated buffers only.
(3) Special Report May Be Required. The administrator may require a special report to determine
whether a critical area and its associated buffer is functionally isolated.
18.22.280 Adaptive management.
Adaptive management is an ongoing process ifof assessing critical area policies, regulations, and
procedures and this process is intended to identify ways of improving critical area protection.
Monitoring of process improvements leads to a feedback loop that can be used to continuously
Commented [GB16]: WDFW 12/16/25- changes made
Commented [GB17]: WDFW12/16/25 – change may to should – no changes
Commented [GB18]: WDFW 12/16/25 – Change made
make improvements. Monitoring includes assessing if permits followed all applicable regulations,
if regulations are implemented consistently over time, and if regulations are effectively resulting
in no net loss of critical area functions. The County looks to improve processes, and, as funding
and staffing allow, are interested in evaluating regulatory and nonregulatory actions affecting
critical area protections.