HomeMy WebLinkAbout032111_ra03
Regular Agenda
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
TO:
Board of County Commissioners (BoCC)
Philip Morley, County Administrator
FROM:
AI Scalf, Director of Community Development
Stacie Hoskins, Planning Manager ~
David Wayne Johnson, Associate PI~
Agenda request for March 21, 2011
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Request for BoCC determination on acceptance of a Planning Commission (PC)
Recommendation for MLA08-00257 - A Jefferson County Planning Agency initiated
ODC Text Amendment for Sexually Oriented Businesses (SOBs)
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Planning Commission hereby presents their recommendation dated
February 2, 2011, regarding Sexually Oriented Business regulations for the Board's considemtion and
possible acceptance.
BACKGROUND: The Planning Agency and Board of County Commissioners have determined a need
for Adult (Sexually Oriented) Business regulations. On February 16, 2005, the Planning Commission
unanimously agreed to request the Board of CountY Commissioners pass momtoria prohibiting the
issuance of permits and approvals pertaining to adult businesses until the appropriate planning could be
conducted and regulations could be adopted. On March 14, 2005 the BoCC passed the first of seven such
momtoria pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390. The PC subcommittee prepared a report and draft adult
business ordinance language to further the progress on ultimate adoption of development regulations
addressing adult businesses. DeD Staff completed a Staff Report incorpomting the PC Report with
suggested UDC amended text, and presented it to the PC on April 21, 2010. The Planning Commission
held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on Wednesday, May 19,2010, delibemted and voted
on the issue June 2, 2010. Their findings, conclusions and recommendation to approve the suggested
amendment MLA08-00257, including creation of new Chapter 5.10 to license Sexually Oriented
Business, is outlined in the Planning Commission Recommendation for MLA08-00257 dated June 2, 2010
and signed June 17,2010. Staff presented the PC recommendation to the BoCC on June 28, 2010 and at
that time, instructed staff to do more research on the issue of licensing. On November 8, 2010, Staff
presented findings on the BoCC request for more information, requested an additional momtorium, and
that the recommendation be remanded back to the PC for further review and possible revision. The
BoCC approved both requests.
ANALYSIS: At the PC meeting of February 2, 2011, the issue was reviewed, debated and resulted in a
vote to revise the recommendation. Their findings, conclusions and recommendation to approve the
Regular Agenda
suggested amendment MLA08-00257, deleting the creation of new Chapter 5.10 to license Sexually
Oriented Business, is outlined in the attached Planning Commission Recommendationfor MLA08-00257
dated February 2, 201 I and signed March 2, 2011.
ALTERNATIVES: The BoCC may accept the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
MLA08-00257 as indicated, or they may decide to not accept the recommendation and hold a public hearing
before making a final decision to either approve, approve with conditions or deny the amendment
FISCAL IMPACT/COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Should the BoCC adopt the Planning Commission
Recommendation, a Conditional "C" Use permit review and approval would be required for the siting of
SOBs, with the associated fees collected.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the BoCC accept the revised PC recommendation of
February 2,201 las presented and instruct staff to draft the appropriate ordinance to enact the new
regulations.
REVIEWED BY:
~M64
,
~
-..
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4450
Planning Commission Recommendation for MLAOS-00257
UDC Text Amendment
For
Sexually Oriented Businesses:
Revised Recommendation with Findings and Conclusions
To: Board of County Commissioners, Chair John Austin;
Department of Community Development, Director AI Scalf; and
Interested public of Jefferson County
Date: February 2, 2011
Attached: 1) Guidance to Create Findings for MLA08-00257 - Sexually Oriented Businesses (SOBs)
2) Proposed Text for JCC Chapter 18.10 Definitions
3) Proposed Text for JCC Chapter 18.15 Allowed and Prohibited Uses
4) Proposed Text for JCC Chapter 18.20 Performance Standards
5) Proposed Text for JCC Chapter 18.18lrondaleIPort Hadlock Allowed and Prohibited Uses
The Plannina Commission Is pleased to submit our UDC Text Amendment recommendation to the Board of
County Commissioners for review. The Planning Commission has worked diligently to review and deliberate
the application for an amendment to the Unified Deveiopment Code (UDC) Chapters 18.10 Definitions, 18.15
Allowed and Prohibited Uses, 15.20 Performance Standards, 18.18 Irondale/Port Hadlock Allowed and
Prohibited Uses in an effort to provide guidance to the Board on this effort to amend the UDC.
We recognize the hard work of DCD Staff in preparing the application and the Staff Report, and we support
their proposal for amendments to the Unified Development Code. In an earlier version of this recommendation
dated June 2,2010, The Planning Commission also recommended creation of a new section to JCC TItle 5
Licenses, Regulations and Taxes, to be titled Chapter 5.10 Licensing and Operation of Sexually Oriented
Business Facilities. The creation of Chapter 5.10 was meant to compiement the UDC amendments by
requiring a license for operation of, and employment at Sexually Oriented Businesses. The Planning
<
/
~
Commission has reconsidered that recommendation as being problematic in light of the fact that Jefferson
County does not currently issued business licenses. Therefore, the Planning Commission would encourage
the Board of County Commissioners to revisit the business license prOVisions at such time as a uniform
business license requirement is established, or when a Sexually Oriented Business is established within
Jefferson County.
In preparing our recommendation, we have considered the growth management indicators and other general
guidance on required findings, and therefore do hereby declare the following findings and conclusions in
support of our decision:
A. Required findings as per Jefferson County Code (JCC) Title 18.45.080(1)(b)(i-Iii):
1. The circumstances related to the proposed amendment ancflor the area in which it is located have
substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. For example,
the Planning Commission initiated an investigation in 2005 and requested a moratorium on SOBs untii
UDC regulations could be fully researched and adopted.
2. The assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are still valid,
however, consideration of assumptions that lead to the adoption of the Comp Plan are not applicabie to
this proposal since it is for amendment of the development code and not the Comp Plan.
3. The proposed amendment reflects current, widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County.
For example, the City of Port Townsend has similar regulations.
B. Additional required findings as per Jefferson County Code (JCC) Title 18.45.080(1)(c)(i-viii):
1. The proposed site-specific amendment meets concurrency requirements for transportation and does
not adversely affect adopted level of service standards for other public facilities and services. Does not
apply since this is not a site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
2. The proposed site-specific amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and impiementation
strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. Does not apply since
this is not a site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
3. The proposed site-specific amendment will not result in probable significant adverse impacts that
cannot be mitigated, and will not place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service
capabilities. Does not apply since this is not a site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the
development code.
2/2/2011 SOB UDe Text Amendment Recommendation to BoeC
Page 2
v
4. The subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated
land use development, including planned surrounding land uses. Does not apply since this is not a
site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
5. The proposed site-specific amendment will not create a pressure to change the land use designation of
other properties, unless the change is In the long-term best Interests of the county as a whole. Does
not apply since this Is not a site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
6. The proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the land use and population growth
projections that are the basis of the Comprehensive Plan. Does not apply since this is not a site-
specific amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
7. Within an Urban Growth Area, the proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the
adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate area and the overall UGA.
N/A. Does not apply since this Is not a site-specific amendment, but an amendment to the
development code.
8. The proposed amendment Is consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), the
County-Wide planning Policies for Jefferson County, any other applicable inter-jurisdictional pOlicies or
agreements, and any other local, state or federal laws. Yes, the amendment is consistent with all of
the above.
C. Inquiry to the growth management Indicators as per Jefferson County Code (JCC) Title
18.45.050(4)(b)(i-vll):
1. Growth and development as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan is occurring slower than
anticipated due to economic conditions.
2. The capacity of the county to provide adequate services has diminished due to a decrease in tax
revenue
3. There is sufficient urban iand, as designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need. Does
not apply since this is not a Comp Plan amendment, but an amendment to the development code.
Anticipated need is not likely to be more than currently designated for commercial use.
4. Are any assumptions upon which the Comprehensive Plan is based no longer found to be valid?
Does not apply since this Is not a Comp Plan amendment, but an amendment to the development
code.
5. Are there changes in county-wide attitudes which necessitate amendments to the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan and the basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision
Statement? Does not apply since this is not a Comp Plan amendment, but an amendment to the
development code.
2/2/2011 SOB UDC Text Amendment Recommendation to BoCC
Page 3
~
6. Are there changes in circumstances which dictate a need for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan?
Does not apply since this is not a Comp Plan amendment, but an amendment to the development
code.
7. There are no inconsistencies between the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA or the Comprehensive
Plan and the Countywide Planning Policies for Jefferson County.
D. The Record
In addition to the guidance provided by GMA, the Countywide Planning Policies, the Jefferson County Code,
and the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission finds:
1. The record also contains evidence with respect the Planning Commission's Committee Report on
'Secondary Effects Study of Sexually Oriented Businesses."
2. Assertions in the record can be confirmed by information from other sources, namely similar
jurisdictions with similar regulations.
3. This 2011 UDC Text Amendment recommendation is based on the record.
4. This 2011 UDC Text Amendment recommendation satisfies iegal criteria.
5. This 2011 UDC Text Amendment recommendation is specific to the application to amend the UDC
Chapters 18.10 Definitions, 18.15 Allowed and Prohibited Uses, 15.20 Performance Standards, 18.18
IrondaielPort Hadlock Allowed and Prohibited Uses (MLA08-00257).
6. This 2011 UDC Text Amendment recommendation removes proposed code for creation of new JCC
Chapter 5.10 Licensing and Operation of Sexually Oriented Business Facilities, originally proposed in
the June 2, 2010 recommendation.
E. Additional Findings and Conclusions
There are no additional findings of fact or conclusions of law pertinent to this decision.
We recognize that our recommendation will be reviewed and considered by the Board of County
Commissioners, who will then take formal action to either approve, approve with conditions, or deny this UDC
Text Amendment MLA08-00257.
On February 2, 2010, The Jefferson County Planning Commission voted 6 to approve, and 1 to deny, MLAOB-
00257 and recommend that the BoCC aoorove the Planning Agency's request to amend the UDC proposed
under MLAOB-00257 as indicated in attachments 2 - 5, suggested text.
~
(nee' a.~~
Z./flIheCJI?aI/
Peter Downey, PI ning Commission Chair
Date
2/2/20]] SOB UDC Text Amendment Recommendation to BoCC
Page 4
ATrACHMENT 1
v
e
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 379-4450
Guidance to Create Findings for MLA08-00257
UDC Text Amendment
For
Sexually Oriented Businesses
Proposed Amendment to:
Jefferson County
Unified Development Code, Title 18
June 2, 2010
&
February 2,2011
ATI'ACHMENT 1
~
'HOW TO DECIDE' Supplement for Planning Commission
ForMLA08-00257: SOB Text Amendment
1. Make a motion, second, discussion?
Recommendation (one ofth.e following):
1} Approve X (five in favor - June 2, 2010}(five in favor, one opposed - February 2,
2010)
2} Deny
.3} Approve with conditions or modifications
PC Motion: Amend the code as indicated
2. Dellberations-discusslon of proposal and entering findings & conclusions
"For all proposedamendments, the planning commission shall develop findings and
conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators
setforth inJCC 18.45.050 (4)(b)(i) through (4)(b}(vii), as well as thefollowing;"
[NOTE: text from JCC 18.45.080 (1)(b). The indicators mentioned in .050 will
be introduced and addressed later in this worksheet.]
a) Required findings; adapted from JCC 18.45.080 (1)(b)(i-iii) :
(i) Have circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in
which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan? [Answer 'yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes, The Planning Commission in 2005 voted to investigate the issue
and requested a moratorium of SOBs.
'How to Decide' Supplement/or Planning Commission
MLA08-00257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-/0&212/2011
Page2of8
v
ATTACHMENTl
(ii) Are the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is
based no longer valid; or is new information available which was not considered during
the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan? [Answer 'yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes, see above
(iii) Does the proposed amendment reflect current, widely held values of the
residents of Jefferson County? [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response; Yes, since these regulations are consistent with the City.
"In addition to the required findings set for in [the subsection above], in order to recommend
approval of a formal site-specific proposal to amend the comprehensive Plan, the planning
commission must also make the following findings:"
[NOTE: JCC 18.45.080 (4)(c)(/) through (4)(c)(viiiJ]
b) Additional required findings, adapted from JCC 18.45.080 (4)(c)(i) through
(4)(c)(viii)
(i) The proposed site-specific amendment meets concurrency requirements
for transportation and does not adversely affect adopted level of service
standards for other public facilities and services. [Answer yes', 'no', or 'not
applicable' and describe why]
PC Response: N/A - not site specific.
(iI) The proposed site-specific amendment is consistent with the goals,
policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson
'How 10 Decide' Supplement/or Planning Commission
MLA08-00257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page3 0/8
,
ATfACHMENT 1
..
County Comprehensive Plan. [Answer yes', 'no', or 'not applicable' and describe.
why]
PC Response: N/A
(Iii) The proposed site-specific amendment will not result in probable
significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated, and will not place
uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities. [Answer
'yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: N1A
(Iv) The subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use
designation and the anticipated land use development, including planned
surrounding land uses. [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: N/A
(v) The proposed site-specific amendment will not create a pressure to
change in the land use designation of other properties, unless the change is in
the long-term best interests of the county as a whole. [Answer yes', 'no', or 'not
applicable' and describe why]
PC Response: N1A
(vi) The proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the land
use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive
Plan. [Answer yes', 'no', or 'not applicable' and describe why]
PC Response: N1A
'How to Decide' Supplement for Planning Commission
MLA08..fJ0257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page 4 018
.
..
ATfACHMENT 1
(vii) Within an Urban Growth Area, the proposed site-specific amendment
does not materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and
services to the immediate area and the overall UGA [Answer yes', 'no', or 'not
applicable' and describe why]
PC Response: NJA
(vIII) The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act
(Chapter 36.7OA RCW), the County-Wide planning Policies for Jefferson County,
any other applicable inter-jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other
local, state or federal laws, [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes, Federal and focal law.
c) JCC 18.45.050(4)(b)(i) through (4)(b)(vii)
Inquiry into the Growth Management Indicators:
i) Is growth and development as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan occurring
faster or slower than anticipated, or is it failing to materialize? [Answer yes' or 'no'
and describe why]
PC Response: Yes, slower than anticipated.
ii) Has the capacity of the county to provide adequate services diminished or
increased? [Answer 'yes' or 'no' and cJescribe why]
PC Response: Yes, diminished
'How to Decide' Supplement/or Planning Commission
MLA08-00257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page 5 0/8
,
ATTACHMENTl
~
Iii) Is there sufficient urban land, as designated and zoned to meet projected
demand and need? [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: NlA
Iv) Are any of the assumptions upon which the plan is based no longer found to be
valid? [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: NlA
v) Are there changes in the county-wide attitudes? Do they necessitate
amendments to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the basic values
embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement? [Answer yes' or 'no'
and describe why]
PC Response: N/A
vi) Are there changes in circumstances which dictate a need for amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan? [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: N1A
vii) Do inconsistencies exist between the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA or the
Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Planning Policies for Jefferson County?
[Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: N/A
'Haw to Decide' Supplement for Planning Commission
MLA08-00257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page60f8
.
~
ATI'ACHMENT 1
d)
The Record
1) In addition to the guidance provided by GMA, the County-Wide Planning
Policies, the Jefferson County Code, and the Comprehensive Plan, what else
is in the record with respect to this proposal? [Answer yes' or 'no' and
describe why]
PC Response: PC SOB Committee Report (attachment 1 of Staff Report)
2) Can assertions in the record be confirmed by information from other sources?
[Answer yes'or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes, from other codes
3) Is the decision we are about to make based on the record? [Answer 'yes' or
'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes
4) Does the decision we are about to make, as far as we know, satisfy legal
criteria? [Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes
5) Is the decision we are about to make limited to the specific request at hand?
[Answer yes' or 'no' and describe why]
PC Response: Yes
'How to Decide' Supplement for Planning Commission
MLA08-002S7: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page 70f8
.
ATTACHMENT 1
.
Are there any additional findings of fact or conclusions of law pertinent to this decision?
PC Response: No
3. Repeat motion and vote (one ofthe following):
a. In favor - Yea (five to zero - June 2, 2010)(five in favor- February 2,2011)
b. Opposed - Nay (one opposed - February 2, 2011)
c. Abstain - I
'Haw to Decide' Supplement for Planning Commission
MLA08-00257: SOB UDC Text Amendment
6-2-10&2/2/2011
Page80f8
,
,
ATTACHMENT 2
18.10.190
S definitions.
"Sale" means the conveyance for consideration oflegal or beneficial ownership.
"Salt water intrusion" means the underground flow of salt Water into wells and aquifers.
"Screening" means a method of visuaIly shielding or obscuring a sIru=e or use from view by fencing, waIls, trees,
or densely planted vegetation.
"Seaward" means to or toward the sea.
Seawater Intrusion. (See "Salt Water intrusion. '')
"Seawater intrusion protection zone (SIPZ)" means aquifers and land overlying aquifers with some degree of
vulnerability to seaWater intrusion.
"Sedimentation" means the process by which materia1 is transported and deposited by water or wind.
"Seismic hazard areas" means areas subject to severe risk of damage as a result of earthquake-induced ground
shaking, slope failure, settlement, or soil liquefaction.
"Sensitive areas" associated with lCC 1820.345 Sexuallv Oriented Businesses inclnded: Schaols. Dav Care Faciliti~ Libraries.
Off-road onblic trails & oaths. Public indoor recreatiooal facilities. Hosoitals. Parks & Plavlll"ounds. Places of worshio (te.
churches). Commuoitv Centers. Senior Citizen Centers. Cemeteries. Residential nei~hborhoods. Master Planned Resorts.
"Sensitive species" means species that could become threatened as classified by the State of Washington
Department ofFish and Wildlife, Nongame Program, and the Department of Natural Resources, Washington
Natural Heritage Plan.
"Service area" means a geographic area defined by a county or intergovernmental agreement in which a defined set
of public facilities provides service to development within the area (e.g., an area identified by a public water system
that includes the ability to provide a water tap).
"Setback" means the distance a sIru=e is placed behind a specified line or topogrephic feature.
"Sewerage treatment facilities" means the management, storage, collection, transportation, treatment, utilization,
and processing of sewage from a municipal or community sewage treatment plant, not including community drain
fields.
"Sexuallv Oriented Business" means 1. Any exhibition. performance or dence conducted in an Sexually Oriented
Business facilitY where such exhibition. oerformance or dance is distinllliished or c!1=terized by a oredominant
emohasis on matters deoictin~. describinl!. or simuIatinl! any specified sexual activities or anv soecified anatomical
areas: or
2. Anv exhibition. oerformance or dance intended to sexuallv stimulate any oatron and conducted in a Sexuallv Oriented
Business facilitv where such exhibition. oerformance or dance is oerformed for. arran~ed with. or en_ed in with fewer than all
oatrons in the Sexuallv Oriented Business facility at that time. with SCDarale consideration uald. either directlv or indirectlv. for
such oerfonnance. exhibition or dance. For numoses of examole and not limitation. such exhibitions. nerfonnances or dances are
commonly referred to as table dancine. couch dancim~. taxi dancine. laD dancinu. orivate dancing: or straddle dancing:.
. Sexuall Oriented Retail Store meanin an e closed buildin or rtion thereof whic for mone or an. other form 0
consideration. devotes a sil!llificant or substantial aortion of stock in trade to the sale. exchan~e. rental. loan. trade. transfer or
viewin~ of sexual Iv oriented materials. For Domoses of this definition. a retail store devotes a si@ificantorsubstantial nortion of
its stock in trade to sexuallv oriented materials if the sale. excbanae. rental. loan. trade. transfer or viewing of such sexual Iv
oriented materials is clearlv material to the economic viabilitv of the business. It is rebuttably orosumed that such sexually
oriented materials are clearlv material to the viability of the business if sexuallv oriented materials accounts for:
I. Twentv-five Dercent or more of the retail dollar value of arnss sales over any auarterlv neriod:
2. Twentv-five nercent or more of the floor area of the SflJre onen to the public:
3. Twentv-five Dercent or more of the retail dollar value of all merchandise disnlaved in the store:
4. Twentv-five nercent or more of the store's inventorY (whether measured bv retail dollar value or number of items): or
5. Twentv-five cement or more of the store's stock in trade.
In no event shall a retailer whose transactions onlv incidentallv or maminallv relate to sexuallv oriented materials be considered a
sexuallv oriented retail store. .
ATTACHMENT 2
4. Also see lCe 5.10.030 for a more comolete list of definitions (contin.eol uoon adootion of Chaoter 5.10)
"Shooting range" means a facility specifically designed and used for safe shooting practice with firearms and/or for
ore her,! pr;;ctioe, with individual or group firing positions for specific weaponry.
"Shoreline Management Act" means the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58 RCW), as amended.
.Shoreline Master Program (SMP)" means the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program.
.
I'll
I-
Z
...
:e
o
~
iCC
~I
g~
Jl
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ J! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
z z
~ ~ ~ J! J! ~ 0 J! ~ ~ ~ J! J! 0 ~ 0 0 ~
z z z z
~ 0 0 J! J! ~ 0 J! ~ ~ ~ J! J! ~ ~ 0 ~ 0
z z z z z
~ ~ ~ J! J! ~ ~ J! ~ ~ 0 J! J! ~ ~ 0 ~ u
z z
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
z z
~ J! t:l J! J! ~ ~ J! J! J! J! J! ~ J! J! J! J! J!
~ J! t:l J! J! ~ ~ J! ~ J! J! ~ ~ J! J! J! J! J!
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ J! ~ ~ 0 J! ~ ~ J!
z z z
J! J! t:l J! J! ~ ~ J! J! J! J! J! u J! n J! J! J!
>-
u U t:l J! ~ J! ~ ~ ~ 'ii' J! ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
0' z
u U t:l J! ~ J! " 0 ~ 'ii' J! ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
0' z 0' z
u U t:l J! s J! ~ ~ ~ 'ii' J! ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
u 0' z z
~ ~ 0 J! ~ J! ~ ~ (i ~ J! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
z z
uo~
~ 0 0 J! ~ ~ uS ~ ~ J! J! 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
~o u
z z >- EN Z z
"':'!
.. -Il i
s ] '"
i s -1l
'" . 6 I ."
oS ~ J "i ~ > I
.~ J '" 8 '0
~ ~ ~ j S .jj ;; a
::!- .: J
.. I 6 hi' .~ .~ I l .jj ;; a
~ i i j .~ U .;: .~ j Ii
~ .1 I t '0 1 6 E
B j f ~ U 8 a I I
j ~ ~ ., ."
!e !! a " li of ~j I 8 j
]1 J J .& 8e 'g .0 l~ Ii
j I 'O~ 61 .~ g .,
.8." ~ :2' JI J aa ~~ c ~ .N
~~ as d !~ !~ 1l'" '. 0 ~
zJ! :l! :l! ",'l; .88 0 8 'C ill
t:l t:l
,
~ !
ATTACHMENT 4
18.20.340 Sewage sludge and septage.
(I) Storage and treatment of sewage sludge and septage at any facility other than an approved sewerage
system plant, and development of storage or treatment facilities, are industrial uses for the purposes of this
code and are subjeet to the site standards for industrial uses in this chapter and to approval by the county
health department
(2) The application of sewage sludge and septage to laud for disposal or for fertilization is subject to
approval by the Jefferson County board of health, or its designee, and state approval requirements. [Ord. 8-06
~ I]
18.20.345
(!)
(2)
Sexuallv Oriented Businesses (also see JCC 5.10)
Sexuallv Oriented businesses (SOB) shall be located at least 1.000 feet from any sensitive site (see
JCC 18.10.190 fordefinitionst
SOBs with live performances must be located 1.000 feet from the I'rol'ertv line of
(a) any business selling alcoholic drinks
(b) anv other SOB
Shall meet slaudards under JCC 18.20.140 Commercial uses - Slaudards for site development
(3)
18.20.350 Small-scale recreation and tourist uses.
(I) Small-Scale Recreation and Tourist Uses. Small-scale recreational and tourist uses rely on a rural
location and setting and provide opportunities to diversify the economy of rural Jefferson County by utilizing
the county's abundant recreational opportunities and scenic and natnrai amenities in an environmentally
sensitive manner consistent with the rural character of the county. Upon approval pursuant to this code, these
types of uses maybe conducted in the land use districts specified in Table3-1 in JCC 18.15.040 and as
provided for in small-scale recreation and tourist (SRT) overlay districts under JCC 18.15.572. Agritourism on
designated agricultural lands is regnlated in JCC 18.20.030. agricultural activities and accessory uses. The
following list of uses is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of
small-scale recreation or tourist uses:
(a) Aerial recreational activities such as balloon rides, glider and parachute events;
(h) Animal preserves and game farms;
(c) Equestrian centers, on parcels 10 acres or larger in size;
(d) Campgrounds and camping facilities;
(e) Commercial fishing ponds;
(t) Cultural festivals;
(g) Miniature golf, not to exceed a gross use area of one acre;
(h) Model hobby parks and sites on parcels 10 acres or larger in size;
(i) Outdoor recreational equipment rental and/or guide services;
(j) Outdoor shooting and archery ranges;
(k) Private hunting or fishing camps;
(I) Public display gardens;
(m) Recreational off-road vehicle (ORV) and all terrain vehicle (A TV) parks and recreational areas on
parcels 20 acres or larger in size;
(n) Recreational, cultural or religious conference center/retreat facilities on parcels 10 acres or larger
"
in size;
(0) Recreational vehicle parks, travel trailer parks, and commercial campgrounds on parcels at least
five acres in size;
(P) Rural restaurants, only when associated with a primary recreational or tourist use; and
(q) Rural recreational lodging or cabins for overnight rental on parcels 10 acres or larger in size.
(2) Unnamed Small-Scale Recreation or Tourist Uses. Other uses not specifically named above may be
classified as small-scale recreational and tourist uses by the administrator, subject to the provisions of this
section, upon documentation by the applicant that the proposed use is dependent upon a particular rural
location or setting and is consistent with the intent and application ofRCW 36.70A.070(5Xd) and the
Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan.
~
c
Ii!
'jij
l!
"
E
E
8
al
-
c
"
;::
~
o
~
;:
"0
C
11l
'jij
U
~
"
E
E
8
c
:c
-
~
~
'"
tl
~
'jij
.,
c
"
"0
~
~
tlD
C
;;
'"
~
.5
"0
"
;!l 'jij
.9 ~
"iii "0 V!
~il~~
~02'2~
"t: ~ ::s ti
't;mbOClJ
-=::s.Eu
.... 0" == c
.E II) QJ to
m g ~ E
to OQ +-> 0
t:: .... 0 't:
o 0 c: (LI
U QJ e
-g -5f to 5
ro tlO UI ~
U) r::: E Lfl
st :a g ~
~ :s '- d
C.QQjN
V)S'SoO
.s ::J E \""'l
" E :::,. tJ
E'Xl!--'
o ro 0 cu
::I: :l; ::I: 8j
f
In
I-
Z
...
:E
:c
u
~
<C
u u ~ "'
= = ~ 0 ~ 0 ~. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
... ... '" ~ Z Z z
.e .e
I JI s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ UI ~
'" ~'" Z
.!i .,.!i
I iJ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I ~
I ) z Z
ll'
~
~ jJ;a
e. ;a ~
! ~ 5 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~I 0
-< j ~ ) Z Z Z z
J
.,
~ b
., h
~ !5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~I ~
! =) z
1: ~
i.
'"
=
=
~ II
=
~ t.l "' '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " U! Q
>-
$6
~
I
~ J
f:5 "' ~ ~ '" ~ ~ !'J ~ !'J '"
" ~ ~ U[ Q
>- >- >- >- >-
~
.,
J tl ~
~ ~ ~ ~ " Ol
.S iI .~
~ :! is ;:l ~ .., "g
.IS ~ ~ is .~ "'"
>;<e .IS "' .ll I
] Ol '" "'"
-<'" - !a !i
:;!~ "E '" !i e ;:l "'
t " ~ ~ ~ e ~~ ] f mOl "' ;5
iJl S g. ~ >> 6 '* .a ~~I J
....... s ~g r- ~ bQO b Ol.-
j 'Iil ... .s~ c fIl "' I
'" 0 ~ 11 ] ~ .S
u &if <I:: jj :8 O<$:l ~~
:< cr ~ 0 gj
&i] a .- ::?J ~
..< t>.!l. rIl a:l
~Nn')~
...
c
"
E
f!!
'5
0-
f!!
;::
u;
c
"
..,
'jij
.,
c
"
..,
~
o
-
~
:ii'
'"
'"
"
..0
-
o
c