HomeMy WebLinkAbout040411_ca02
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST
TO:
Board of Commissioners
)
DATE:
L. ..
./ /,
t,"h~' .I
FROM:
Philip Morley, County Administrator
April 4, 2011
RE:
Notice of Pnblic Hearing: Draft Asset Management Strategy for State Forestlands in
East Jefferson Connty; April 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Request Commissioner approval of ?\lot ice of Public Hearing for Monday, April 18, 2011 at 10:30
a.m. in the Commissioners' Chamber to hear public comment and consider finalizing and
adopting the draft "Forests for the Future: An Asset Management Strategy for State Forest
Lands in East Jefferson County," for submittal to the Washington State Department of Natural
Resources.
ANALYSIS:
At the County Administrator's Briefing to the Commissioners on March 28, 2011, the Commissioners
were briefed on a draft strategy entitled "Forests for the Future: An Asset Management Stratepy
for State Forest Lands in East Jefferson Countv." /+ ""/~J IS. !l-n. ~:__( . -d p."'>' ~<
(',..-, '''rf.l.;._ c.....;'-....tl'f$ ..J.~'-<i..s.- ::,""~rv_; ;..t...'...'.--1-.....,;..Jli-..Ef.o:r":"o.--.:.......:.....:...r.'__.....'.,;,.
The draft Strategy was prepared by a citizen committee convened by Commissioner Austin, with
assistance by county staff. This work was in response to a May 11, 2009 letter from
Commissioner of Public Lands Peter Goldmark, giving Jefferson County two years to investigate
alternatives to a proposed forestland exchange between the Deparnnent of Natural Resources (DNR) and
Pope Resources. The DNRlPope exchange that DNR placed on hold was intended to implement DNR's
2008 Asset Management Plan for East Jefferson County.
The Drat! Strategy, once tlnalized, could be submitted to DNR as an alternative to the DNRlPope
exchange and DNR's 2008 Asset Management Plan.
At the conclusion of the March 28, 2011 briefing, the Board of County Commissioners wished to hold a
public hearing to solicit input from the public prior to taking action on the Drat! Strategy and submitting
it to the State.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Public Hearing notice only. Sufficient funds are budgeted for publishing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pass a Motion approving publishing the attached Notice of Public Hearing.
REVIEWED BY:
7
.' ,
.' j'... /
. (i:: (.,~"') /? /'
'p'nTIip Morley, ~ounty Administrator
\ I _'
/
.,/~. //
_.), ::,:fc:/ //
Date
-
Please publish one time: April 6, 2011
Bill to Jefferson County Commissioners
Non-departmental #15829
PO Box] 220
Port Townsend, W A 98368
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Draft Asset Management Strategy for State Forestlands in East Jefferson County
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing is scheduled by the JetJerson County
Board of Commissioners for MONDAY. AfJril18. 2011 at 10:30 a.1n. in the Commissioners'
Chamber, County Courthouse, 1820 Jefferson Street, Port TO~11Send, W A 98368 to hear public
comment and consider finalizing and adopting the draft "Forests for the Future: An Asset
Management Strategy for State Forest Lands in East Jefferson County," for submittal to the
Washington State Department of "fat ural Resources, The Draft Plan is available for viewing on
the County website at ,,\ \\ '\.c,. IT"".
Approved and signed this 4th day of ApriL 2011.
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
John Austin, Chairman
-
Forests for the Future
An Asset Management Strategy
for State Forestlands in East Jefferson County
DRAFT
March 25, 2011
Public Lands Group
Forests for the Future
An Asset Management Strategy for State Forestlands
in East Jefferson County
The legislature finds that since the 1980s, abaut seventeen percent af Washingtan's
commercial farests have been converted to ather land uses...
The legislature further finds that as these forests vanish, so do the multiple benefits they
provide to our communities like locol timber jobs, clean air and water, corbon storoge, fish and
wildlife habitat, recreation areas and open space...
The legislature further finds that the legislature has provided palicy directian to the
department of natural resources to protect working forest and natural resource lands at risk of
conversion.
-Introduction to Community Forest Trust legislative proposal,
DNR working draft 12-20-10
INTRODUCTION
East Jefferson County is fortunate to contain approximately 23,457 acres of state-owned forest
land dispersed widely across the county in blocks ranging in size from 40 acres to over 2,000
acres. These properties, managed by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(DNR), provide important economic and environmental benefits for Jefferson County. As
Jefferson County's population grows, these public lands become increasingly important for a
variety of reasons as summarized below-
1) Forest land base - State timber lands playa very important role in preserving East
Jefferson County's timberlands and the overall viability of the local timber industry.
State timber lands are, in a sense, anchors that secure the overall forest land base of
private and public lands. If transferred into private ownership through a iand exchange,
these lands could be sold immediately for large lot development under the current
zoning, or potentially rezoned to higher density development, along with adjoining
lands. A large forest land base of mixed public and private lands ensures the wood
supply needed to support the local timber industry and employment.
1
2) Timber revenue - state timber lands categorized as Forest Board Trust lands provide
revenue to the Jefferson County's junior taxing districts in which the timber was cut.
Because these Forest Board lands are located within most of the taxing districts, the
.
districts share in the benefits. Timber revenue from other Trust lands, such as the
Common School Trust, benefit programs at the state level, such as the General School
Construction Fund.
3) Recreation - the dispersed nature of state timberlands in East Jefferson County provide
accessible outdoor recreational opportunities close to most people who live in the
county and near population centers, Including Port Townsend, Chimacum, Port ludlow,
and Quilcene. Many of these public lands are increasingly valued and used by the local
citizens for hunting, fishing, walking, mountain biking and as open space.
4) Environment - the lowland forests of Puget Sound play an increasingly important role In
protecting habitat and water quality in the most rapidly growing region of Washington.
State timber lands in eastern Jefferson County have been managed under the State's
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for over 10 years. The HCP forestry rules provide a
much greater level of habitat protection to fish and wildlife than under Forest Practice
regulations that apply to private lands. For example, habitat features such as old growth
legacy trees, wider stream buffers, and forested wetlands are routinely conserved under
DNR management. If these state lands are transferred to private ownership, the
habitats protected under 10 years of DNR stewardship could be lost, even without
selling the lands for development.
The long term strategy for these public lands, entitled the Asset Management Strategy far East
Jefferson County (AMS), was developed by DNR staff in 2008 under Doug Sutherland, the
previous Commissioner of Public Lands. The AMS consisted of a map developed by DNR staff
that delineated only the western portion of East Jefferson County, roughly west of Center Road,
as viable for longterm DNR forestry (Figure 1). This was the area DNR proposed to keep in
"working forest" while leaving the remainder of its ownership open to potentially being traded
away as opportunities presented themselves.
Concurrent with development of the AMS, DNR was also working on a proposal for a land
exchange to implement it. In 2009, DNR held a public hearing in Chimacum to discuss a
proposed land trade with Pope Resources (Pope), a private timber and development company.
The land swap involved trading Pope about 3,000 acres of DNR timberlands in the central part
of East Jefferson County in exchange for DNR receiving about 4,000 acres of Pope lands to the
west near the Olympic National Forest. (The unequal acreage is due to the higher timber and
land values of the DNR lands.) In essence, DNR was proposing to implement its AMS and
"retreat to the hills"; backing out of the more populated parts of the cou nty, and consolidating
their timber holdings in more remote areas near the federal land boundary.
2
.
~..:. .~"""
,.'-'"
Natural Area Landscap.s
i..,
"
"_~'.d"J.......',.,3,,_,, .'~
. << ...... ":, r '-"
. ", ". ~..~," ", .
f;<";:"'<<:"~ " '.',{.011 '" .).
',:" "0' ....... P'"
........ .' .,
'...._~._.._~" EAST.:::".......')
~\ I
" ,<
~FFt;~so~
- "-J .. .-'
i '. .
\:
. f
.1 i.
I .I"
;; f I
.. j , J
.; ,'\
, .:" :-lliJtl~~.f~P
. ::;<+<~:t <~'!-'':
\.;:E~". "
V " :Ji'
'OIl c.;~"j",6
'_f~ ;"v
it.. '
,~.
!
,r-t
~
, Interim Hold & Manage
~).1r
"'~.,I
':.}
'. i('
""~';1 i
S]
! Working Forest Landscapes
~~
\; Conservation Interest Landscapes
"'''''''--'~''':-''';;)r-;.;~",
-~::'~;Y.~~.~.
j -.
L\
~.:
i("
-;."
,"
\'"
,
accuracy.
Jd.'nfOrmation,
for ,"ors or omissions.
".,Z008
Figure 1. DNR's 2008 Asset Management Strategy map. Only state timber lands west of about Center
road are proposed for long term forestry, or "working forest". Red and blue parcels are state
forestlands.
3
For many citizens of East Jefferson County who had assumed DNR was committed to long term
ownership of their holdings as "working forest", the land exchange and AMS were alarming
surprises. DNR's proposal would not only put public lands with a long history of careful forest
stewardship and high environmental and recreational values in the hands of private industry,
but would increase the risk of conversion across the more vulnerable portion of East Jefferson
County's forest land base.
In defense of the AMS, DNR argued that they were faced with the challenge of continuing to
manage small parcels in areas under increasing development pressure. DNR stated that as East
Jefferson County developed, it would become increasingly difficult and costly to do forestry.
Illegal dumping, tree cutting, and other trespass and encroachment issues, as well as
neighboring residents' opposition to timber sales would become larger problems. In addition,
as land prices increased in the area to reflect Highest and Best Use values, it would become
more difficult for DNR to justify holding parcels for forestry instead of trading them for larger
parcels in more remote areas.
However, this "strategy of retreat" is a net loss game. It would result in the loss of important
wildlife habitats that have formed over hundreds of years, and which have been protected for
over a decade under the state's progressive Habitat Conservation Plan; severely reduce
accessible public recreational areas; accelerate conversion of forestlands; and seriously impact
revenues of junior taxing districts. The strategy runs exactly counter to the State Legislature's
direction to DNR to protect working forests in areas at risk of conversion. If followed to its
logical conclusion, such a strategy would result in the retreat of DNR from most of Puget Sound,
one of the regions in the state at greatest risk of forest conversion and where forests are most
needed for the continued viability of the overall timber resource base, habitats, and to meet
outdoor recreational needs.
In response to strong opposition to the proposed trade by citizens and the Jefferson County
Board of Commissioners, Peter Goldmark, Commissioner of Public Lands, announced that he
would put the trade on hold to give time for Jefferson County to develop an alternative
proposal that would address DNR's concern with trying to manage dispersed small parcels. In
addition, DNR staff met with conservation groups, timber industry representatives, and local
officials to discuss the AMS and invite public involvement in revising the strategy.
The purpose of this Public Lands Group was to address Commissioner Goldmark's directive and
develop a new Asset Management Strategy for East Jefferson County. The intent of the strategy
is exactly the same as DNR's stated goals - to protect the forest land base for long term timber
production, recreation, and wildlife. However, the methods and approach are different.
4
METHODS
A group of local citizens formed the Public Lands Group (PLG) and met regularly over a one year
period. The PLG members included concerned citizens and experts in forestry, habitat, and
conservation that had extensive knowledge of the timber management history, habitat
conditions and recreational values of DNR lands in East Jefferson County. Members included:
Peter Bahls - Mr. Bahls is the Director of Northwest Watershed Institute, a non-profit
organization that provides scientific and technical support for watershed restoration in
the Pacific Northwest. He has worked as a fish and wildlife biologist in East Jefferson
County for eighteen years, including six years as the Timber-Fish-and-Wildlife Biologist for
the Point No Point Treaty Council and Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe where he reviewed
state and private timber sales.
Mike Cronin - Mr. Cronin is a consulting forester and the retired DNR District Manager for
the Straits District (East Jefferson County). He worked as the lead DNR forester in East
Jefferson County for over 20 years.
Connie Gallant - Ms. Gallant is executive director of Greenfleet Monitoring Expeditions, a
nonprofit organization that monitors, reports, and educates on the environmental human
impact on estuaries; a volunteer board member/vice president of Olympic Forest
Coalition, and chair of the Wild Olympics Campaign. She also represents Quilcene as a
Precinct Committee Officer of the Jefferson County Democrats. She has successfully
negotiated alternatives with the staff of the Olympic National Forest during timber
harvest proposals that threatened some of the scenic areas surrounding South County.
Jennifer Portz - a concerned citizen from Port Ludlow.
The overall approach of the PLG was to assess each separate DNR block of land, identify its
assets and liabilities, and to recommend the best strategy for long term management given
DNR's concern with dispersed ownership. (Note - a "parcel" as used in this report refers to a
block of DNR land that may include one or more county tax parcels.) The PLG members
considered the forestry, recreational, and habitat/environmental values of each parcel based
on their on-the-ground knowledge, inspection of aerial photos, and available GIS coverages of
streams and other habitats. The results were summarized in spreadsheet format.
Based on each parcel's unique characteristics, and its context within the larger landscape of
East Jefferson County, the PLG identified one or more suitable long-term management
strategies for each parcel. GIS maps were developed by Doug Noltemeier, Jefferson County GIS
Specialist, at the request of John Austin, Jefferson County Commissioner, to summarize the
results. The suite of management options is summarized in Table 1.
5
Table 1. A summary of parcel characteristics that were used to identify management options
for each parcel.
Management Option Parcel characteristics
DNR Hold Productive timberland with low to moderate environmental and social
constraints to timber harvest
Larger parcel (SOO+ acres) or adjoining other zoned forest parcels with
low-moderate risk of conversion.
Community Forest Same as DNR Hold, except n
Located near populated areas with greater development pressure and
conversion risk
Moderate to high recreational use
Moderate to high environmental/habitat benefits
Proposed Trust Land High fish and wildlife and/or recreational benefits
Transfer
Low potential for timber production due to habitat or social factors
Existing Trust Land Already protected as a natural preserve through the Trust Land Transfer
Transfer program, or in the process of being transferred.
Available for Smaller, isolated parcels where potential development of the parcel will
Exchange not significantly increase the risk of conversion of surrounding lands-
because those areas are already developed
Low recreational and environmental benefits
DNR Hold
This management option was identified for parcels that are suitable for continued long-term
timber management by DNR. The parcels are productive timber lands with low to moderate
surrounding development pressure and where timber harvest is not unduly constrained by
environmental/habitat issues or recreational conflicts. "Larger" parcels are generally defined
here as those over SOO acres. Smaller parcels could also be considered suitable for DNR Hold if
they are adjacent to a larger block of commercially zoned forestland.
6
We purposefully did not delineate a "broad brush" zone in East Jefferson County that was
considered suitable for "working forest". Instead, we assessed every DNR parcel individually
and within the context of the surrounding landscape, zoning, and development pressure to
determine if long term forestry was viable for that parcel.
DNR Hold -example
Skidder/Snow parcel, at approximately 2,674 acres, is located in the more remote western
portion of East Jefferson County. Most of the parcel is productive timber iand that can continue
to be managed without substantial environmental or recreational constraints on timber
harvest. There are some areas of high ecological sensitivity within the parcel where potential
for timber harvest is limited, including extensive wetlands and rare plant communities on
grassland mountain balds. Future Tl T may be appropriate for these smaller areas at some point
in the future, but the parcel as a whole is well suited for long term timber management by DNR.
Community Forest
This management option applies to those parcels closer to developed areas where DNR is most
concerned about its ability to manage for commercial forestry with increasing encroachment
issues, higher recreational uses, concerns about timber harvest by neighbors, and increasing
land values. The Community Forest option, in a general sense, entails arrangements that allow
the property to stay in forestry, but relieves DNR of its obligation to provide income for the
Trust. At present, there appear to be two main avenues for Community Forests.
1) DNR Community Forest - DNR is planning to introduce legislation in 2011 that would
enable them to help protect high-risk working forest landscapes from being
converted to non-forest uses. The legislation would establish a new Community
Forest Trust (in addition to Forest Board Trust, Common School Trust, and other
existing trusts). like the Trust land Transfer (TLT) process, funding from the
iegislature would be used to transfer parcels into this new Community Forest Trust
by reimbursing the original Trust. Also as in the Tl T process, the county would not
lose revenue from Forest Board lands with this approach. The transfer relieves DNR
of its perceived Trust obligation to manage the parcel to its "highest and best use",
which in developing areas is increasingly difficult for DNR to justify. The parcel
would continue to be owned and managed by DNR, but with locally developed
management plans that might involve lighter logging and more focus on recreation,
habitat, and ecosystems services. This option would keep the parcel in forestry and
prevent the parcel from being sold or traded for private development.
2) Reconveyance to Jefferson County- Under current state law, DNR Forest Board lands
can be reconveyed to the county for park purposes at no cost, other than an
7
administrative fee to DNR (RCW 7.22.300). In this process, the county requests
reconveyance from DNR, who decides if the need for the park-land is in accordance
with county and state outdoor recreation plans. The reconveyance process includes
a public hearing by DNR and County and approval by the Board of Natural Resources
(http://I,,yvv\;\/.ckr,vvc:.go2L?u bl ic~~ t 10 nS/d rn p _!yco n \/E:~.12J:J;~"EiJ2~:..s.::i.j..:J2.91).
Given the current county budget, reconveyance is only a viable option if the county
can obtain additional revenue to manage the new park. In addition, this option
would result in a loss of tax revenue from timber sales unless the county could
continue to harvest timber on the property.
Although the existing state law does not address the issue specifically, it appears
that the county does have the potential to continue to harvest timber on the
reconveyed land, as long as DNR has approved a timber management plan as part of
the county's Park management plan. Funds from county-run timber sales on the
property could provide revenue for park management and perhaps compensate for
the loss of this DNR-managed Forest Board land.
Another potential option that would raise funds for park management would be to
establish a Park Management District in all or a part of east Jefferson County. Voter
approval is required to establish a Park District, which would have taxing authority
to raise funds through a property tax within the District.
Community Forest - example
Teal Lake East and West are two of several larger parcels in the eastern portion of East
Jefferson County, near Port Ludlow and the Hood Canal bridge, in an area of higher population
denSity and risk of conversion. These parcels have a combined acreage of approximately 1,187
acres and are productive for timber, with few environmental issues, but with increasing
recreational use. Due to rising land values and population pressures, DNR is leery of keeping
these parcels long-term. Although there is a 20-year moratorium on re-zoning of this area from
a previous rezone negotiation between Jefferson County and Pope Resources, if traded to a
private corporation, the parcels would likely be sold to private buyers for large lot
development, or eventually used to expand high denSity development of nearby Port Ludlow.
Proposed Trust Land Transfer
This management option would transfer a parcel into permanent protection for fish and wildlife
habitat, open space or recreation under DNR's Trust Land Transfer (TLT) program. This option
was selected for parcels that generally have very high ecological value, and in some cases
recreational or open space value, yet limited timber value. In many cases, important
8
environmental features, such as federally listed species, unstable slopes, or rare plant
communities, are protected by law and severely constrain the timber harvest that could occur
on the parcel. DNR's TL T program is a somewhat complicated, but an effective way to both
protect important habitats as well as fully reimburse the Trust for the loss of the timber
revenue and timberland.
The Trust Land Transfer program uses TLT funds approved by the State Legislature to transfer
Common School land into a protected status. The funds reimburse the statewide general school
construction fund for the timber value of the parcel (as if it had been cut) and also pays for the
purchase of replacement timber lands by DNR. However, the replacement Common School
properties may not necessarily be in Jefferson County, but can be anywhere in the State that
meet certain criteria for productive timber land.
The parcel protected byTLT can be transferred to any government jurisdiction that agrees to
own and manage it, such as a county, city, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW), or Washington State Parks. The parcel can also be retained by DNR, but only if it is
within the boundary of a DNR approved Natural Area. To implement TLT for Forest Board and
most other Trust types, an "intergrant exchange" must occur, whereby a Common School
parcel of equal value in the same county is identified and the Trust designations are exchanged.
Thus, the county does not lose the Forest Board lands, or the timber revenue that those lands
provide to junior taxing districts. In general, TLT is an excellent tool to reposition DNR Trust
assets to protect lands that have high value for recreation or fish and wildlife with limited
timber harvest potential, while improving the long term productivity of the DNR timber base.
Trust Land Transfer Example
An example of a parcel well suited to Trust Land Transfer option is Thorndike 160. This 160-acre
parcel is located along Thorndyke Creek and has exceptional ecological value. Most of the
parcel is comprised of more than one-half mile of the mainstem of Thorndyke Creek, several
tributaries, wetlands, and extensive floodplain wetlands that provide essential habitat for
salmon and other wildlife. The riparian areas and wetlands are in good condition, composed of
naturally regenerated, older second growth forest. Due to the environmental sensitivity of the
site, very little logging can be done by DNR under the Habitat Conservation Plan, which is more
stringent than rules for private timber logging (that would allow logging of forested wetlands
and a larger portion of riparian areas).
The Trust Land Transfer option makes the most sense here to best protect key habitats as well
as improve the financial health of the Trust through the acquisition of replacement lands with
better timber production potential. However, because this is a Forest Board parcel, DNR would
need to undertake the additional administrative step of an intergrant exchange to convert the
9
parcel to Common School land for the transfer. In addition, because the parcel is not within a
DNR Natural Area boundary, a sponsoring agency, such as WDFW or State Parks would need to
agree to accept ownership and permanently protect the property (unless DNR decided to
establish a new Natural Area here).
Existing Trust land Transfer
This management option applies to parcels that have already been transferred, or are in the
process of being transferred, through Trust land Transfer program to a protected status.
Oabob Bay, Gibbs-Beausite Lake, TL T lease - examples
This management option includes parcels that are already protected by DNR as part of the
Dabob Bay Natural Area, and properties near Port Townsend and along the Shine shoreline that
were leased to Jefferson County under a 50-year TLT lease, as well as the pending Gibbs-
Beausite Lake Tl T that was proposed by DN R for the fiscal year 2011-13 Tl T list of projects.
Available for Exchange
This management option involves DNR trading away a parcel in an area of higher conversion
risk, in exchange for receiving a parcel in a more remote area, as was proposed in 2009 Pope
ResourcesjDNR exchange. This option was generally not preferred because such trades
inherently increase the risk of conversion in the at-risk areas that DNR is moving from. DNR
parcels obtained by private iandowners in more developed areas could be sold for large lot
development under the current zoning, or potentially rezoned to higher density in the future,
accelerating conversion in the surrounding area of currently zoned forestland.
Even if they continue to be managed as timber iand, important fish and wildlife habitats could
be lost from public forestlands traded into private ownership. Stream buffers, forested
wetlands, and old growth legacy trees remaining on the prior DNR properties would no longer
be conserved to the standards of DNR's Habitat Conservation Plan, but under the less
protective Forest Practices rules that apply to private lands. Thus, this option is only
appropriate for small parcels without moderate to high environmental and recreational
benefits that could be lost through private industrial logging or sale for development. In
addition, this option is only appropriate for DNR parcels that are already adjacent to developed
lands and thus, do not serve as anchors for maintaining forest land uses and forestry of
surrounding lands.
Available for Exchange -example
The Tala Point parcel is a good example of a parcel that is appropriate for a private exchange of
this type. The approximately 73 acre isolated parcel is relatively small for DNR to maintain in
10
forestry and is nearly surrounded by a gated development. Its potential development under
private ownership would not significantly influence conversion in the surrounding area since it
is already largely developed. In addition, because this is a gated community, full public access to
the parcel for recreation is problematic, making the Community Forest option less appealing.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Parcel bv Darcel summaries
A total of 45 distinct DNR parcels, totaling 23,457 acres, were identified and mapped (Figure 1).
It is important to note that acreage figures used in this report are based on GIS parcel data from
DNR and provide only approximations of actual acreage. These parcels include predominately
Forest Board and Common School Trust lands. Parcels are dispersed throughout East Jefferson
County in all of the Fire Districts. Parcels that were part of the proposed 2009 Pope-DNR trade
are outlined with a thin red line. Figure 1 also highlights Common Schoo/lands that were
identified in a 2009 Public Hearing for use in the Dabob Bay Natural Area intergrant exchange
process.
The PLG assessed individual parcels for a range of public benefits, including timber, habitat, and
recreation, and identified one or more management options for each parcel. One page
summaries of each parcel's characteristics were prepared (Appendix A). A summary of the
ratings and management option selected for each parcel is provided in Figure 2 and Table 2.
Some parcels have more than one management option - for example "DNR Hold or Community
Forest". A total of 10 combinations of the five primary management options were chosen for
the parcels (Table 3). The first option in a combination listed is the preferred option. However,
either option identified was considered suitable, given the characteristics of the parcel, its
public benefits, and influence on the surrounding lands. Parcels that have the DNR Hold option
as the preferred of two or three selected alternatives are parcels that the PlG felt could
continue to be managed as working forest by DNR. If DNR maintains otherwise, one of the
other identified options should be employed.
A management option can also involve different options on different portions of the same
parcel. For example "DNR Hold and TLT (to DNR)" on the Dabob West property involves a
proposed TlT on 200 acres and keeping the remaining 617 acres in DNR Hold.
11
DNR Lands in
Eastern Jefferson County
DRAFT Mar252011
.
.0;.
~-...~..._~. .
~-:==.:.:
Ei.i;;m-_"
" ' , ,
C~bOl 00\' !ojat Irel Area
nONR ::::orrmc1 S~hool L~nds
[Jct'm'''o'eSI3oird_iJn~s
OJNO Natu'al A,'ea
[JJE'~er;;01 C)un~"' E-:- Leae8
Potertl8 Inlorqar E .-ha1oeP opertl6S
Otrer-ru3tT,'pe3
Fire CisllCI
l~
I
u
1I'
Figure 1. Map of East Jefferson County showing DNR ownership.
12
I (Proposed Asset Management Stra'~:~.
--t'\. for DNR Lands in
-o~..... East Jefferson County
Mar252011
<
C<( j
::i:l
-" '
:l .......,
~
,-,'"
-
,
.
~
.,
,"
~"
.
~
"
,
r-
~,,"~.;o~"'C;;:;"-O~
:;J
.~
'I-.J'
-.
mIl~~"1
".
.~~,
"_.C.,,",,
I~~'
."')~'"
/
/
,/'
I
,/:
/
'\
;..
1
\.
\
:';,\
//,
,
; '''-.",
i
"",
.~'~,"
i
\
\
\
1'''''=
\;q- I:'
~i''''"'';'''
J" --
I "
I _,
"~"' ....~~:
"'.';'" -;p~ , .
! -'
I'~'
",:';;'"
"".,:
C--,
,~.O"
:.",,,.'---'
'11'.
I
I
I
.._...J
--"'"
,/
/
/
,
/
,
..
.
K"O'~'
~
o ly m p 10::
N""OO'. F"... _-::~I~:'
..
/
/
/___"'"1 Proposed Management FlreDlot"~t-;=r
.DNR Hdd or A"'ila-)lef'~." E:<<:hdn~" DDd~~t BdY N.tural Area
iIIC:'JR J-:old ~r C~mmum,vForest C mn:ercl~Fo-""t Zonl::l~ CF B~
!!C~.TR Hok: or Comnunicy I'o:eet or TL T ?ura I'ores' ZOfiln3 F.F ~o
'.
,/
rNFosedTLT
IIllE"i'tjng~ri:::...processn-T
.D~;P,:;o;d
""
i
!
,
/
/
/
I
~]:iNR Pro:>0sed E"",=~~~ed:o Pope '."..
Figure 2. Map of management options for each DNR parcel.
1'.'.'..-. 'I
~~.,: :
,.....,
,~1"'."'
~"
!
/
-.'
'1'..""..'1.
,,,. ....... . <..... ~.."'
.~..'*'.
...~:.
,
.
_._--._~'
~---/~
/
.'".'.~'
----.-L.I.~,'
,/
,
,
->p/
~"'''-'~'~._'~'~~-''''
"'~~.","~_.."".
....-_..-.'-
~:~,g2::'-
~
13
Table 2. DNR parcels, total acres, summary rankings and management recommendation
DNR Parcel Name Acres Recreation Habitat Timber Recommendation
Anderson Lake 582 H H H DNR Hold or Community Forest
Beaver Valley 521 H H H DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest
Camp Harmony 182 H H M DNR Hold and TLT (to WDFW)
Cape George 243 H M L DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest
Coyle Road 149 M M M DN R Hold
Crocker Ridge 1,002 M M H DN R Hold
Dabob Bay Natural Area 1,909 H H M Existing TL T
Da bob East 158 M M H DNR Hold
Dabob West 817 H H H DNR Hold and TLT (to DNR)
Dev lis La ke 494 H H M Existing TLT, TLT (to DNR) and DNR Hold
Disco 120 L M H DNR Hold
Duckabush Lower 44 H H L TLT (to WDFW or State Parks)
Duckabush Upper 40 M H L TLT (to WDFW or State Parks)
Eaglemou nt 80 80 M H M DNR Hold or TL T or Community Forest
East Blynn 1,321 M M H DNR Hold
Eaton 657 M M H DNR Hold
Egg and I 325 M M H DNR Hold or Community Forest
Gibbs- Beausite Lakes 291 H H M Existing TL T
La rson La ke 40 40 L M M DNR Hold or Exchange
Larson Lake 80 79 M M M DNR Hold or Exchange
Leland/Ripley 1,070 H M H DN R Hold
Lemonds Road 79 L M M DN R Hold
Lone 40 40 L M L DNR Hold
McDonald Creek 587 L M M DNR Hold
MtJupiter 695 M M L DNR Hold
Penny Creek 2,322 H H H DNR Hold
Quimper Corridor 112 H M L Existing TL T
Silent Lake 1,104 H M H DNR Hold
5kidder/5now 2,674 M H H DNR Hold
South Shine 49 H H L Existing TL T
South Snow 346 M H H DNR Hold
Spencer Creek 156 L M L DNR Hold
Tala Point 80 73 H M M DNR Hold or Exchange
Tarboo East 820 H M H DN R Hold
Tarboo Upper 863 H M H DNR Hold or Community Forest
Teal 40 (Paradise Bay) 38 L L M DNR Hold or Community Forest
Teal Lake East 655 M L H DNR Hold or Community Forest
Teal Lake West 532 M M H DNR Hold or Community Forest
Termination Point 59 L L M DNR Hold or Exchange
Thorndyke 160 157 M H L TLT (to WDFW)
Thorndyke 80 78 L M M DNR Hold
Triton Cove 294 L M H DNR Hold
Walker Mtn 1,119 M M H DNR Hold
WestJacob Miller 121 H M L DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest
Zelatched Point 360 M M M DNR Hold
Total acreage 23,457
14
Table 3. Number of parcels and total acres within each proposed management option or
combination of options.
No. of Total Percent Name of single
Management strategy parcels Acres of total parcel
DNR Hold 21 15,151 64.6
DNR Hold or Community Forest 6 2,995 12.8
TLT (to WDFW or State Parks) 2 84 0.4
TLT (to WDFW) 1 157 0.7 Thorndyke
Existing TL T 4 2,361 10.1
DNR Hold or Exchange 4 251 1.1
DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest 4 965 4.1
DNR Hold and TLT (to DNR)* 1 817 3.5 Dabob West
DNR Hold and TL T (to WDFW)* 1 182 0.8 Camp Harmony
Existing TLT, TLT (to DNR) and DNR Hold* 1 494 2.1 Devils Lake
Totals 45 23,457 100.0
'portions of the parcel are proposed for different management options.
Choosing to implement the preferred DNR Hold option in the parcel strategies would keep most
DNR lands in working forest. A total of approximately 826 acres is proposed for TLT, or 4% of
the 21,096 acres not currently in TLT (or in process). Community Forest is proposed as the best
long range solution for some of the parcels in areas at higher risk of conversion if DNR is intent
on moving these lands out of a timber Trust. Four parcels in east Jefferson County are
considered potentially suitable for trade to a private entity.
The recent Dabob TLT and other potential TLTs or DNR Community Forest transfers will
generate millions of dollars for DNR's Property Replacement Account that can be spent
anywhere in the state to purchase property that meet DNR's criteria for productive timber
lands. We encourage DNR to re-invest these funds in Jefferson County to further consolidate
working forests. These acquisitions should not be limited to the "working forest" zone
delineated in DNR's 2008 Asset Management Strategy, but implemented anywhere in East
Jefferson County where there is an opportunity to help build on existing DNR parcels to
strengthen long term forestry potential. Possible areas for DNR acquisitions include
approximately 800 acres of Rainier lands north of the Beaver Valley parcel, 350 acres of Green
Diamond lands adjacent to the Upper Tarboo parcel, and Pope Resources holdings along the
Forest Service boundary near the Skidder/5now and Penny Creek parcels.
CONCLUSION
The dispersed pattern of DNR forestlands in East Jefferson County is an asset as well as a
challenge. Many of these DNR lands are increasingly important to anchor the timber base of the
larger region, for accessible recreation, and to conserve rare habitats. Yet, DNR is concerned
15
that these smaller parcels in developing areas are more expensive to manage and more difficult
to justify keeping in forestry over the long term as their land values increase. However, trading
these parcels for larger acreages in more remote areas is a strategy of retreat from the
challenge of protecting at-risk forestlands and the timber base. New strategies and tools need
to be employed to deal with dispersed parcels, so that these lands can continue to provide the
highest levels of public benefits without compromising DNR's fiduciary responsibility to the
trust recipients.
To address DNR's concern with dispersed parcels in East Jefferson County, the Public lands
Group evaluated each parcel for its environmental/habitat, recreational, and timber benefits to
choose from a range of options for long term management that best protected the public
benefits of the parcel. For parcels in those areas of east Jefferson County at greater risk of
development, we believe that most can continue to be managed as working forest. We
understand DNR's concern in trying to do forestry near areas of increasing residential use and
public concerns with timber proposals. However, we believe that public support for sustainable
forestry is growing in east Jefferson County and that this long term landscape plan for specific
parcels will help solidify that commitment. We support the continued timber management by
DNR for these lands and expect to work with DNR toward greater acceptance of timber harvest
on dispersed working forestlands in general.
If DNR is intent on taking some parcels out of a timber Trust, we recommended transfer to a
Community Forest Trust or county ownership for management as a Community Forest.
Four of the smaller parcels were considered suitable for private exchange because their public
benefits are relatively low, including their importance in helping maintain the surrounding
forest land base.
In some cases, where parcels had very high ecological benefits and low timber potential, we
recommended transfer of the parcel to natural area protection through the Trust land Transfer
process.
Finally, recent and pending Trust Land Transfers in East Jefferson County are generating millions
of dollars for DNR's Property Replacement Account. We strongly recommend that DNR use
these funds in East Jefferson County to purchase private timber lands at-risk of conversion that
adjoin their existing holdings. Most of the DNR parcels, although dispersed, occur within a large
area of commercially zoned forest land. This larger forest land base could be strengthened by
DNR's commitment to expanding public forest blocks across the entirety of its existing holdings
in East Jefferson County so as to assure the economic and environmental benefits of
forestlands and a strong timber base in East Jefferson County for generations to come.
16
APPENDIX A. Parcel Summaries for DNR parcels in East Jefferson County
Notes
1
Site number such as DNR-01 are parcels in the 2009 proposed DNR-Pope land exchange
2 Acreage and percent stand type and age are estimates from DNR GIS parcel data and 2009
aerial photography
3 Stands listed as 1940 stand origin may have originated earlier (1900-1940) and are generally
naturally regenerated, mixed species olderforests
4 In summary ratings, N = none, L = low, M = moderate, H = High
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the pubiic
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praductian R H
Recommended Optian(s)
Summary Reason
Anderson Lake
Common School - 542, Forest Board - 39
582
Mostly 3 with some 4
1940s, 25%
1970s 13%
1990s 17%
2000s, 45%
Multiple forested wetlands
Unauthorized bicycle trails throughout
Moderate - the management only easement road is gated, but the
north end abuts Anderson Lake State Park with a bike trail entering
from the park
Chimacum Tri-Area
High hunting, no fishing
High - many user built trails
Good wildlife habitat in mixed aged forest with large wetland buffers
No
Old growth Douglas fir and red cedar remnants in cedar/fir forest
Anderson lake State Park, large lot rural residential on other
None known
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Neighbors have demonstrated support for working forest status
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Tatal Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Sacial harvest canstraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility ta the public
Near papulatian centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian ar share line habitat
Unique ar rare farest types
Other considerations
Adjacent awnership
Part af a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,i,M,H)
Recreatianal Value Rating H
Ecalagical Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praductian R H
Recammended Optianls)
Summary Reasan
Beaver Valley
DNR 09
Common School
S21
3
1980s, 13%
1990s, 17%
2000s, 23%
1920s, 47%
Single family domestic water system downstream, forested wetlands
Concerned neighbor
Moderate - locked gate at Pope easement road off Phillips Road. East
side is adjacent Hwy 19 near Chimacum and Port Ludlow
Yes - Port Ludlow & Chimacum
Moderate hunting
Yes - includes user-built ATV trail
Very good wildlfe habitat with large trees in and near forested
wetlands. Type N small stream
Type N small stream
Older, naturally regenerated forest with the largest second growth
Douglas fir in the area
Pope on south side, Port Ludlow on east, and private residential on
other sides
DNR timber sale being planned
DNR Hold or TL T or Community Forest
High ecological values to be lost if transferred to private
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest canstraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recammended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Camp Harmony
Common School
182
3
1920, 55%
1990s, 25%
2000s, 30%
High bluff waterfront on Dabob Bay limits harvest on west side of parcel
Beach front neighbors with harvest opposition history
Walk in only on gated DNR road, from Camp Harmony county road
No
High - hunting, fishing and shellfish gathering on DNR beach accessed
from Dabob Bay only
None known
High - known eagle nests along bluff and high quality marine shoreline
forest
1/2 mile of shoreline with public tidelands
Residual old growth Douglas fir trees in older secand growth along Bluff
Rural residential, incliuding beachfront homes on north; large,
undeveloped private parcel on east
No
DNR Hold and TLT (to WDFW)
High value shoreline with adjacent public tidelands for TLTto WDFW or
State Pa rks
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praductian R L
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Cape George
Common School
243
4 and 5
1900, 13%
1970s, 1S%
1980s, 25%
1990s & 2000s, 47%
Moderate - low volume on dry ,low productivity site
High - rural residential adjacent on ali sides
High - public roads
High - Port Townsend and Cape George
Moderate hunting, no fishing
Yes - user-built informal walking trails
High - important for wildlife due to undeveioped parcel surrounded by
residential
None
Some older age second growth with residual old growth trees on low
productivity site
Rural residential
No
DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest
One of only a few undeveloped forest parcels on North Quimper
Penninsula with high open space values
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviran. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecolagicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Coyle Road
Forest Boa rd
149
revised for Dabob Exp 01-11
3
1940s =44%
1970s = 27%
1980s = 27%
1990s = 2%
Low
High - open DNR roads off Coyle Road
No
High hunting, no fishing
None Known
No, but upper end of steep slopes that drain to Camp Discovery Creek
None
Dabob Bay Natural Area, Pope, other rural residential
West boundary is adjacent to Dabob Bay Natural Area
DNR Hold
In CF 80 zone and near other similar DNR parcels
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Option!s)
Summary Reason
Crocker Ridge
Common School - 77, Forest Board - 925
1002
3
19405 , 35%
19805, 2S%
1990s, 25%
20005, 15%
Low
Low - except hwy 104 corridor
Moderate - walk in from gate on hwy 104
No
High for deer and bear
No - walking on roads
Eagle, osprey, murrelet habitat
No
Older forest in SW corner
Mostly Pope, some smaller ownerships by Crocker Lake
No
DNR Hold
Good location in area of larger parcels and CF 80 zone
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stond 2 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings IN,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R M
Recommended Option Is)
Summary Reason
Dabob Bay Natural Area
Natural Area (in process)
1,909
1940, 60%
1970s, 10%
1980s, 10%
1990-2000s, 10%
High - slope stability, waterfront, eagle, numerous streams
Mod-residential and shellfish concerns
High - Q4000 mainline DNR road on west side, other county roads
No
High - hunting
low - only a few trails
High - older shoreline forests and small stream habitats
High - extensive marine shorelines and small streams
High - heritage forest types identified by DNR
DNR, Pope Resources, and residential
All parcels included within the expanded Dabob Bay Natural Area
boundary, approved 2009, and Trust land Transfer completed or in
process for all parcels
Existing Tl T
High ecological and recreational values and constraints on potential
timber harvest due to steep slopes and critical habitats
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitot
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rore forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of 0 larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Option(s]
Summary Reason
Dabob East
Forest Board
158
revised jan 10,2011
3
1940s ~ 35%
1980s ~ 65%
large wetland
Good with open DNR road off Coyle road
No
High hunting, no fishing
None known
Moderate - mixed age forest wildlfe habitat
Moderate - wetlands and tributary riparian
No, but some older, naturally regenerated forest
Dabob Bay Natural Area, Pope, other rural residential
Adjoins Dabob Bay Natural Area to the west
DNR Hold
Large tract in area of industrial forest land
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Enviranmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecolagicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Dabob West
Common School - 384, Forest Board - 433
817
3
19405, 40%
19605, 10%
20005, 20%
19805, 30%
Moderate - occupied marbled murrelet site on 40 acres
High - open heavily used DNR roads
No
High hunting, no fishing
None known
Good large parcel mixed forest wildlife habitat
1/2 mile shoreline on Dabob Bay
Lots of old growth residual trees, murrelet habitat, Pre-HCP example of
dispersed retention clearcut, 19605 brush rehab with dispersed large
overstory trees
Dabob NAP, Pope, large lot rural residential
Proposed TL T for area in the NW that includes murrelet site
DNR Hold and TLT (to DNR)
Good timber growing site, with access and multi age class forest, Trust
Land Transfer for 80 to 200 acres including occupied murrelet site
adjacent to Dabob Bay Natural Area
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Sociai harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Devils Lake
Common School - 41S, Natural Area - 79
494
3
1920s, 60%
1960s, 10%
2000s, 30%
Includes Devils lake NRCA and gene pool reserve. No harvest on steep
slopes along Dabob Bay
Unstable stream banks downslope on Indian George Creek with
restoration projects near mouth, BPA power corridor
low -management only easement on locked road
High - Quilcene
High - hunting and fishing
High - around Devil's lake
High - at Devils lake and eagle nesting above bay, older forested
shorelines of Dabob Bay
High - marine shorelines of Dabob Bay (1/2 mile long) considered "Gene
Pool Reserve"
High -Devils lake bog and older 2nd growth with residual old growth
forest in NA and slopes
USFS, DNR and timber industry
Big Qui/cene Watershed Analysis, NRCA Site Plan
120 acres in SW corner feasible for continued forestry, not TL T
Existing TlT, TLT (to DNR) and DNR Hold
Steep slopes above Dabob Bay prevent timber harvest and high
ecological value - add to existing Devils lake Natural Area, remainder
could be managed with adjacent Walker Mt. tract
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecolagicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praductian R H
Recommended Optianls)
Summary Reason
Disco
Forest Board
120
3
1940,42%
2000s, S8%
Fish-bearing (Type F) tributary to Salmon Creek
West boundary is rural residential
No public access, management access through Pope roads (easement
pending)
No
Moderate deer and bear hunting
No
Type F tributary to Salmon Creek
No - but older, naturally regenerated forest on parts of parcel
Pope on all but east side
Upstream of Snow-Salmon Creek restoration project
DNR Hold
Part of a larger industrial forest block
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Closs
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Duckabush Lower
Common School
44
3
1940, 100%
Fish-bearing tributary (Type F) to Duckabush River
Adjacent to high density development on three sides
High - adjacent county roads
Moderate - near Brinnon and subdivisions
Moderate for hunting
Unknown
Proximity to river and low elevation winter elk range, that may include
this parcel.
Some along Type F tributary
None known, but mostly naturally regenerated, older mixed alder-
conifer hillside.
Adjacent to Canal View subdivision
Potential elk winter range
TLT (to WDFW or State Parks)
High value for wildlife and recreation, high density development on
three sides small and isolated from other DNR lands
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibiiity to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecological Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Optian(s}
Summary Reason
Duckabush Upper
Common School
40
3
1940, 100%
Bisected by Duckabush river and fish-bearing (type F) tributary
Small parcel with recreational and rural residential parcels adjacent
Low - no road or easement
Brinnon only
Mod hunting, probably fishing
None known
High - mainstem of river and potential for low elevation winter elk
range
Older, high quality forest along Duckabush River and tribs
None known
Pope or other timber industry on south, small private tracts on other
sides
No
TL T (to WDFW or State Parks)
Very high quality habitat along Duckabush River with significant timber
harvest constraints
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron, harvest constraints
Socia' harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecolagicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Eaglemount 80
DN R 13
Forest Board
80
3
1900,10%
1990, 90%
Chima cum Creek stream corridor
Rural residential adjacent ownership
High - located at end of county road by Peterson Lake
Yes - Chimacum and Port Townsend within 10-15 minutes
Moderate hunting
None known
Upper reach of west fork Chimacum creek in this parcel, core spawning
area for coho salmon
Type F Riparian corridor
Important stream habitat for coho spawning, but 1990 logging left
minimal stream buffer, mostly young forest on parcel
Peterson Lake PUD property on west, Rural residential on north and
east,and industruial forest lands on south
DNR Hold or Community Forest or TLT
Core saimon habitat for Chimacum Creek
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibiiity to the pubiic
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a iarger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
East Blynn
Common School - 408, Forest Board - 13S, Other Trust Types - 777
1321
3&4
1940s, S7%
1970s, S%
1990s, 12%
2000s, 26%
Low -but some forested wetlands
Low - but communicationjmicrosite on mt top and powerline on road
route
Low - with multiple owners, private gates, walk in only
No
High hunting for deer and bear
None known
High - mixed age 2ndj3rd growth forests
Several small Type F streams
No
Mixed timber industry and some non-industry large lots
Part of 4000+ acre block in adjacent Clallam Co.
DNR Hold
Part of much larger forest block in CF80 zone
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rore forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of 0 larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,i,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Eaton
Forest Board
657
3&4
1940, 28%
1960s, 15%
1970s & 19805, 27%
1990s & 2000s, 30%
Moderate - some unstable slopes associated with incised stream
channels
Low - but some rural residential neighbors
High -old Coyle road and ungated DNR roads
No
High hunting, no fishing
None known
High - upland and wetland wildlife habitat in mixed age forest
Some small fish-bearing (Type F) streams
No
Pope and rural residential
No
DNR Hold
Adequate size, accessible parcel in areas zoned for forestry
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviran. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Optian(s)
Summary Reason
Egg and I
Common Schaal
32S
3
1920, 15%
1970s, 15%
1980s, 20%
1990s & 2000s, 50%
Low - with some forested wetlands
Low - with some adjacent rural residential development
Moderate - walk in only on gated DNR owned road
Chimacum
High hunting, no fishing
Low - minor use with user-built ATV trails
Moderate - wildlife habitat in mixed age forest with gated roads
None
Residual old growth trees scattered in older second growth
Mostly large lot rural residential
No
Adjacent to part of 800 acres of Rainier timber lands on Chimacum
Ridge
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Larger parcel, near other large parcels, with few environmental
constraints, that can be managed for timber
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Gibbs- Beausite Lakes
Forest Board
291
3
1940, 33%
1990s, 40%
2000s, 27%
Beausite Lake, eagle nest, forested wetlands
Kiwanis Camp use and harvest opposition
High - near Gibbs Lake, County roads and Kiwanis Camp. However,
Kiwanis has land posted, so public access restricted on west side
Chimacum Tri-Area
Moderate hunting, fishing limited to existing Gibbs lake County Park
High - many user-built bicycle and walking trails
High - adds older forest connection between existing County park lands
and two lakes
Low - but extensive riparian on adjoining County lands
No, but older, naturally regenerated forest on 76 acres between lakes
Jefferson County Parks and rural residential
Currently proposed TL T parcel
Existing TL T
High recreational and ecological values, encroaching residential
pressure, and support for use as county park addition
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreatian/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Enviranmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other consideratians
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option(s}
Summary Reason
Larson Lake 40
DN R 11
Forest Board
40
3
19S0, 100%
Poor due to locked Pope road and no easement
Port Lud low
Moderate hu nting
none known
Moderate
None
None, except entire parcel is naturally regenerated forest
Pope on all sides
2011 timber sale planned
DNR Hold
Small parcel surrounded by Pope CF 80 zoning
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Optlon(s)
Summary Reason
Larson Lake 80
ONR 10
Forest Board
79
3
1950, 100%
Adjacent to home on north
Poor - Pope road system no easement
Near Port Ludlow
Moderate hunting
None known
Moderate
None
None known, however, parcel is entirely older naturally regenerated
forest
Pope on south and west, rural residential on other sides
2011 timber sale planned
ON R Hold
Smaller parcel adjacent to other commerical forest zoned Pope land
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Sacial harvest canstraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique ar rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part af a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecalogical Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Leland/Ripley
Common School - 366, Forest Board - 704
1070
3
1940, 27%
19605 = 30%
19805 = 12%
19905 & 20005 = 31%
low
Moderate - two old water systems
High - open DNR roads
No
High - with heavy deer hunting and some shooting
None known
Moderate -multi-age class forest, large wetland adjacent (under
powerline to north)
Small type F streams
One of the oldest DNR planted stands
Pope and other non industry private large parcels
DN R Hold
Good location in and adjacent to CF-80 zone
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other consideratians
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating l
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
lemonds Road
Forest Board
79
3
1930s, 100%
some unstable slopes within the fish bearing (Type F) or non-fish
bearing (Type N P) stream corridors
Downstream neighbors use road through parcel with no easement, yet
refuse to grant DNR access on the private road over lemonds at Coyle
Road junction
low - due to private road
No
Moderate hunting use, no fishing
None known
High - good quality older forest along small stream corridor
Small, fish bearing (Type F) stream
No, but older naturally regenerated forest along Hood Canal slopes
Private, rural residential and recreational properties
No
DNR Hold
Access is yet to be resolved and parcel is small
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Option(s}
Summary Reason
Lone 40
Forest Board
40
3&4
1930, 15%
2000s, 85%
Low
Moderate - No permanent access and rural residential neighbors
Low -no public road and gated private drives
No
Low hunting, no fishing
None known
Moderate - upland wildlife habitat in early succession forest with
retention of legacy trees
No
None known
5 acre and larger rural residential tracts
No
DNR Hold
Small size, but can be managed with other DNR tracts in the immediate
area
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecolagicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praductian R M
Recommended Optian(s)
Summary Reason
McDonald Creek
Common School
587
3&4
1940, 60%
2 OOOs, 40%
Older forest in northwest corner, very difficult access
Poor due to management- only easement on private roads
Brinnon, Olympia
Moderate hunting including by the Tribes for elk, no fishing
None known
Moderate with some high potential elk wintering area
Steep non-fishbearing (Type NP) streams only
None known
USFS and private timber industry
No
DNR Hold
Remote area with good potential for long-term forestry, potentially
valuable elk wintering habitat.
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviran. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of 0 larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Optionls)
Summary Reason
Mt Jupiter
Common School - 461, Forest Board - 234
695
1 to 5
1940, 89%
2000s, 11%
Very steep, difficult to road and log
Very visible in Duckabush Valley
moderate - access on minor part along Duckabush road
Brinnon, Olympia
Moderate hunting, no fishing
Jupiter Mt trail is briefly in parcel near ridge top
Good in valley, moderate on dry south slopes above
Little Riparian, no shoreline
None known
Rural residential on south, U5FS and Pope on N,W and E
No
DNR Hold
Low soil productivity for timber, steep, difficult to access and highly
visible from recreation corridor
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 5 Origin date, percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking troils
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Penny Creek
Common School - 314, Forest Board - 2008
2,322
3
1940,49%
19S0s & 1960s 11%
1970s & 1980s, lS%
1990s & 2000s, 25%
High - significant wetland and riparian corridors
Low - but one 40 acre residential inholding and some perimeter rural
residential
High - via open DNR roads
Yes - Quilcene
High hunting & moderate fishing
None known
High
Type 1 Little Quilcene River and Type F Penny Creek
Large open shrub wetiands some large remnant old growth douglas fir
USFS and Pope + some 40-80 acre nonindustrial lands.
Big Quilcene Watershed Anaysis 1994
Penny Creek is alternate water source for Quilcene hatchery
DNR Hold
Larger parcel adjacent to USFS in larger block of industrial forest lands.
Significant habitat in some areas may be suitable for TLT
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Quimper Corridor
Common School
112
4
1940, 80%
2000s, 20%
Moderate - eagle presence
High - residential neighbors and trail corridor
High - part of Quimper Wildlife Corridor and trails
High - Port Townsend area
Low
High
High - eagle roosting in the area, part of Quimper Wildlife Corridor
no
Moderate - older age class grand fir
Residential
50-year TLT lease to Jefferson County
Part of Quimper Wildlife Corridor
Existing TLT
Important part of Quimper Wildlife Corridor
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Tatal Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviran. harvest canstraints
Sacial harvest canstraints
Recreatian/public use
Accessibility ta the public
Near papulatian centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Enviranmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian ar shoreline habitat
Unique or rare farest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecalogical Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recammended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Silent Lake
includes DNR is
Common School - 40, Forest Board - 1064
1,104
3&4
1940s, 46%
1970s, 6%
1980s, 8%
1990s & 2000s, lS%
Some steep slopes with incised channels, forested wetlands
Silent Lake S acre tracts on an 80 acre inholding (prior Pope land)
High - ungated roads off Coyle Road
No
High hunting, and high fishing use in Silent lake
None known
High habitat values around lake and wetlands
North end of Silent Lake
Older age, naturally regenerated second growth on west part
Pope timberlands, rural residential around lake
A short access road on DNR land, off Coyle road, allows public access to
this fishing lake which will be lost if the parcel becomes private
DNR Hold
Large tract of DNR land with high timber and recreational values,
without major constraints for timber harvest
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
SkidderjSnow
Common School - 1332, Forest Board - 1342
2674
3, small amounts of 2 in valleys
1940, 50%
1980s, 43%
2000s, 7%
Moderate -balds, forested wetlands, unstable slopes on Snow Ck
(Type F)
Low - small portion with Hwy 104 visibility
Good access to west end by Snow Ck. Road, prior city property
No
High deer and bear hunting use, mushroom picking is an established use
None known
Upper mainstem Snow Creek ravine, forested wetlands, multiple type F
streams
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Rare cacti on small balds protected under HCP, extensive forested
wetlands near headwaters of Salmon and Snow Cks
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,i,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Optianls)
Summary Reason
US Forest Service to west, Pope to north and south, other private to
east
Major Salmon-Snow restoration projects downstream
Includes recently obtained city property with large, older age second
growth
DNR Hold
Large block adjacent to other large blocks with good habitat values for
continued DNR management. Subareas of exceptional habitat may be
suitable for TL T
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Totai Acres
Timber
Timber Site C/oss
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 4 Origin dote, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreatian/public use
Accessibility to the pubiic
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Port of 0 Jarger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Praduction R L
Recommended Optian(s)
Summary Reason
South Shine
Un ive rs ity
49
3
1940, 100%
Hood Canal shoreline riparian
Yes ~ Bridgehaven subdivision to south
Yes
Near Hood Canal Bridge, Port Ludlow
Moderate hunting
yes
High ~ shoreline
High
Older age, mixed species, unmanaged pre~1940s forest
Pope timberlands to west, residential to north and south
Existing TLT 50~year lease to Jefferson County
Existing TL T
High fish and wildlife value and limited timber harvest potential due to
shorelines and adjacent residential development
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildiife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger pian
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicoi Value Rating H
Sustainabie Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
South Snow
Forest Boa rd
346
2&3
19405 or older, 21%
19705, 12%
19805,42%
19905, 2S%
High ~ 70 acres of wetlands and buffers
No
High ~ ungated DNR road off of Snow Ck Road
No
High for deer and waterfowi
No
High ~ waterfowl
High ~ large open water and forested wetlands
Residual old growth trees, unique older forested wetland, also 7~acre
patch of 1900 age class timber in NE corner
Pope on north and west, unknown east and south
DNR Hold
About 70% harvestable, with remainder protected and located in CF 80
zone
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Closs
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking traUs
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praductian R L
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Spencer Creek
Common School
1S6
4
1940, 30%
2000s, 70%
Very steep and helicopter logging access only
Visible from US 101 and Dabob Bay
Low - steep slopes and no roads
Quilcene, Brinnon only
Low - steep slopes and no roads
No
Moderate for wildlife, no fish
None
None known
Within mostly US Forest Service ownership corner
Big Quilcene Watershed Analysis
DNR Hold
Within USFS block and moderate to low values
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin dote, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking troils
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rore forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option!s)
Summary Reason
Tala Point 80
DNR 08
Forest Board
73
3
1950, 15%
1974,85%)
Current orfuture residential on all sides
High due to neighbors' recreational use
Moderate - access through gated community
Port Ludlow and Paradise Bay
Low-moderate hunting
Roads used and informal trails
Improving as stand matures
None
Stand 2 is a reclaimed homestead site with evidence of land clearing
and older trees
Small residential tracts + Pope lands
DNR Hold or Exchange
High value for park purposes
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Optionls)
Summary Reason
Tarboo East
Common School - 77, Forsest Board - 743
820
3
1940s =40%
2000s = 30%
1970s = 10%
1980s 20%
Forested wetlands,small Type F streams and unnsrtable slopes
Low
High - Coyle road frontage and walkin access via gated roads
No
High hunting, no fishing
None known
Moderate - large block of mixed age forest with streams and ravines
High - includes major tributaries and ravines of the East Fork Tarboo
Creek
None known
Pope, conservation easement property, Oabob Bay NA
Adjacent to Oabob Bay Natural Area to the south, part ofTarboo
Watershed Project
ON R Hold
long management history located in area of commercial forest zoning
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating H
Ecological Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praductian R H
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Tarboo Upper
DN R 12
Common School - S81, Forest Board - 282
863
3 and 4
1940s, 2S%
1980s, 10%
1990s, 2S%
2000s, 40%
Domestic water system on southwest corner
Adjacent to and visible from SR 104. Adjacent to Olympic Music Festival.
Dragon Track site north of SR104.
High - ungated DNR roads and parcel is contiguous with Tarboo South
Centrally located between Chimacum, Quilcene and Port Ludlow
High hunting use and regular shooting
None known, but heavily roaded
Significant forested wetlands and Tarboo Creek Riparian
Borders Tarboo Creek to west
None known
Pope and rural residential, some protected by conservation easement
Part of Tarboo Watershed Project plan to conserve working forests
Adjacent to Olympic Music Festival, near intersection of Hwy 104 and
Center Road, upcoming DNR timber sale in planning
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Part of larger block in working forest landscape with CF 80 zoning, but
with increasing development pressure near Hwy 104
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Closs
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Port of 0 larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating L
Sustainable Timber Praduction R M
Recommended Optian{s}
Summary Reason
Teal 40 (Paradise Bay)
DNR 07
University
38
3
1990, 100%
Mostly steep, east facing slope
East end is adjacent to Paradise Bay residential development
Poor due to steep young forest, road is owned by Pope, with a locked
gate and no easement
Yes - Port Ludlow/Paradise Bay
moderate for hunting
No
Moderate
None
None
Pope on all but east side that abuts Paradise Bay residential area
Adjacent to commercial forest zoning on south side
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Small parcel, but with potential to expand to connect to East Teal Lake
parcel
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site C/ass
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Saciai harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating L
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option!s)
Summary Reason
Teal Lake East
DN R 05
Forest Board
655
3
1970s, 35%
1980s, 65%
1 acre PUD well and pipeline easement and another waterline
easement
Moderate - near rural residential, but large parcel
Existing road off county road
Near Paradise Bay and Port Ludlow
Moderate hunting
Roads are used by neighbors
Moderate
No
No - all young third growth
Pope timberlands and rural residential
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Suitable for sustainable forestry but close to popu lation centers
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Tatal Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rore forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R H
Recommended Option(s}
Summary Reason
Teal Lake West
DNR 06
Forest Board
S32
3
1940, 31%
1980s, 21%
1990s, 30%
2000s, 18%
Marbled murrelet habitat, Type F stream that is tributary to Shine
Creek, osprey nest circle, two large scrub-shrub wetlands
North end adjacent to Port Ludlow Golf course
Locked easement road through Pope
Yes - Port Ludlow
Moderate hunting
locked roads used
Moderate
small type F streams at north end, two large scrub-shrub wetlands
Some residual old growth trees
Pope timberlands, Port Ludlow, and recently sold Pope Large lots
Pope xchange
2011 timber sale planned. Pope has sold lands on S boundary
DNR Hold or Community Forest
Suitable for sustainable forestry but close to population centers
Site Name
Site Number
Trust Type
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,i,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecalagical Value Rating L
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recammended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Termination Point
University
59
3
1990s, 90%
1940s, 10%
Low
moderate but highly visible from west bound He Bridge traffic
Low - inactive road with no parking off SR104
Low - a few large lot residences on North
Low hunting, no fishing
None known
Moderate - mostly early succession forest
None
Old growth remnants preserved as legacy trees in and out of harvest
units
SR 104 on south, large lot rural residential other sides
DNR Hold or Exchange
Small parcel without permanent road access
Site Name
Site Number
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreatian/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking troils
Enviranmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rore forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecolagicol Value Rating H
Sustainable Timber Production R L
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Thorndyke 160
DNR 2
Forest Boa rd
157
2
1950s, 80%
1940, 20%
High - streams and wetlands
No
No legal access
No
High - Thorndyke is important deer hunting area
No
High - parcel is mainly Thorndyke Creek mainstem, tributaries and
mature forested floodplain with excellent habitat value
High
Older floodplain forest and wetlands
Most of watershed is owned by Pope Resources
TNC interested in possible larger purchases in Thorndyke
TLT (to WDFW)
High fish and wildlife value and limited timber harvest potential due to
streams and forested wetlands
Site Name
Site Number
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near populatian centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Production R M
Recommended Option Is)
Summory Reason
Thorndyke 80
DNR 03
University
78
3
1991, 80%
1940, 20% (riparian corridor in ravine)
Stream ravine and associated unstable slopes
East 20 acres is adjacent to the Bridgehaven subdivision.
Only east 20 acres is accessible. Remainder is through Pope roads with
no easement
Yes - Bridgehaven subdivision
Moderate hunting use
No
Fish-bearing stream corridor and ravine for Spring Creek
Yes - Spring Creek Ravine, Type F
No
Pope on all sides but east - where it abuts small residential tracts
Part of large commercial forest zoning block, recently cut
DNR Hold
Parcel is part of a large forest block
Site Name
Site Number
Grant
Totai Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 2 Origin dote, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the pubiic
Near population centers
Fishing and hunting
Waiking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Nates
Summary Ratings IN,i,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating L
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Option Is)
Summary Reason
Triton Cove
Common School
294
3
1940,80%
2000s, 20%
Low
Adjacent rural residential tracts on east, BPA powerline corridor and no
public access
Low due to management only easements on private roads
Brinnon only
Moderate hunting, no fishing
None known
Moderate wildlife habitat
No
None Known
Part of a very large South Puget Sound Region DNR block
Unknown if DNR SPS Region has plans
DNR Hold
Adjacent to large DNR ownership in Mason County
Site Name
Site Number
Grant
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Ev;ron. harvest constraints
Social harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near papulation centers
Fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Value Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R H
Recommended Optian(s)
Summary Reason
Walker Mtn
Common School - 103, Forest Board - 1016
1119
3
1920s, 18%
1970s, 13%
1980s, 39%
1990s & 2000s, 30%
Low -some steep, but mostly stable slopes
Moderate - high visibility from US Hwy 101 and Quilcene
Low -management only easement on gated road
Yes - Quilcene
High hunting
None known
High value, multi-aged forest
No shoreline but significant NP streams
Some older age 2nd growth with scattered residual old growth
Other DNR, NRCA, USFS, private rural residential parcels on north
Big Quilcene Watershed Analysis
DNR Hold
Good site with little residential adjacent, well roaded and multi aged
forestland
Site Name
Site Number
Grant
Tatal Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Sacial harvest canstraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility ta the public
Near papuiation centers
Fishing and hunting
Woiking trails
Environmental/habitat
Fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare farest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger pion
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Vaiue Rating H
Ecalogicai Value Rating M
Sustainabie Timber Production R L
Recammended Option!s)
Summary Reason
West Jacob Miller
Common School
121
S
1940, 15%
2000s, 85%
Forested wetlands
No permanent access, 3 sides small rural residential tracts
Moderate - road access by temporary permit through County waste
transfer station, high use by nearby landowners
High - very near Port Townsend
Moderate hunting, no fishing
High - many unauthorized user-constructed horse and hiking trails
High - significant for wildlife due to larger parcel in area of small rural
residential parcels
Seasonal forested wetlands only
Low timber productivity site with older age class residual trees
Jefferson County waste transfer station on south, small rural residential
tracts on all other sides
Recently approved adjacent equestrian park may have plans to use
Adjacent to equestrian park
DNR Hold or TLT or Community Forest
One of a few larger, undeveloped parcels in residential interface with
high value as open space
Site Name
Site Number
Grant
Total Acres
Timber
Timber Site Class
Stand 1 Origin date, Percent
Stand 2 Origin date, Percent
Stand 3 Origin date, Percent
Stand 4 Origin date, Percent
Eviron. harvest constraints
Sacial harvest constraints
Recreation/public use
Accessibility to the public
Near population centers
fishing and hunting
Walking trails
Environmental/habitat
fish and wildlife habitat
Riparian or shoreline habitat
Unique or rare forest types
Other considerations
Adjacent ownership
Part of a larger plan
Notes
Summary Ratings (N,L,M,H)
Recreational Vaiue Rating M
Ecologicol Value Rating M
Sustainable Timber Praduction R M
Recommended Option(s)
Summary Reason
Zelatched Point
Common School - 40, Forest Board - 320
360
3 and 4
1940, 11%
1990s, 49%
2000s, 40%
Low
Moderate - rural residential neighbors
High - DNR roads off Coyle and Zelatched road
Low - Coyle community only
High hunting, no fishing
Moderate - some user built trails by neighbors
Moderate - mixed age upland forest wildlife habitat
Moderate - some small Type N (non-fish bearing) streams
OG remnants preserved as legacy in and out of harvest units
Large lot rural residential, except small residential tracts near Coyle
/Zelatched road junction
No
DNR Hold
Adequate size parcel with established management activity and good
access
jeffbocc
From: Washington Trust for Historic Preservation [Washington_ Trust_for_Historic_Pr@mail.vresp.com]
Sent: Tuesday. March 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: jeffbocc
Subject: Register for RevitalizeWA today!
'fCK ru \i;::\.\' ~,~:s Crr1i'1i: ire i' !)~"''i''_~e
Register for RevitalizeWA today!
Join the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation and
Washington State's Main Street Program for
RevltallzeWA, a Main Street and Preservation
Conference in Walla Walla on May 11-13!
Registration is available through Blown Paper Tickets.
Click here to register online, or call 1.800.838.3006.
Detailed conference schedule available next week!
Excellence on Main Awards
It's not too late! Nominations are due Wednesday, April 6,
2011. Washington State's Main Street Program invites you to help
us ceiebrate achievements in preservation and revitalization
in Washington's Statewide Main Street Network! Nominate your
downtown project for an Excellence on Main Award. The awards are
open to Certified Main Street Communities and Affiliates. Awards
will be given out at the Excellence on Main Awards Reception
Thursday evening, May 12th, at RevitalizeWA. UOW,,:Uij(j tk
nomination for":!
3/29/2011
Page 1 of 5
SAVE THE DATE
vita
.
fer :::ur ul::co~in9
\'Vrls.hlngt{:)11 $!,)!e Malr~ Str&f;o~
and Pr€o:.,H'hHIOfl CO'lfl;;.~rf;'rH:l:' In
It.;,)" "'^"',)i!r1~
May 11-13,2011
'."
'i'';
Fe: C~ 1 :1'~~"-:::)r.\jC:
Fie 'I-'. "';:',-: iUf\j
Donate to the Silent Auction!
We will be holding a silent auction at RevitalizeWA and all proceeds
will go to support the Washington State Main Street Program! Have
an item you'd like to donate? Let us know by downloading and
submitting an dOllation form!
Keynote speaker Becky McCray
Becky McCray says that small
businesses and small towns
matter. She is a small town
business owner, with a retail
store and a cattle ranch in
Woods County, Oklahoma.
Through her consulting firm she
helps small town governments,
and promotes entrepreneurship
and tourism in small towns. Her
dedication to small business has
been featured in The New York
Times, BusinessWeek, and
Entrepreneur Magazine. She
publishes the popular website, Small Biz Survival, on small town
small business, and she is the author of 20 Small Business Ideas for
Small Towns and Shop Local Campaigns for Small Towns. All of this
from her home base in Hopeton, Oklahoma, a community of fewer
than 30 people.
Click here to check out Ms. McCray's website and hene to link to her
blog, Small Biz Survival.
3/29/2011
Page 2 of 5
Sponsorship Opportunities are Still
Available!
Sponsorship of this regional event is an excellent way to showcase
your business or organization to a target audience. Conference
attendees will include: Washington's Main Street communities,
small business owners, chambers of commerce, "buy/shop local"
advocates, preservationists, city and regional planners, elected
officials, developers, contractors, craftsmen, community and
economic development specialists, educators, students, architects,
landscape architects and the community at large.
Click Ilere to see to sponsorship opportunities.
Special room rates ($77/single, $84/double) are available at
the Marcus Whitman Hotel and Conference Center through
April 27. Call 1.866.826.9422 for reservations. Questions?
Feel free to contact Membership & Events
Coordinator or Washington State's Main
Street Program Coordinator.
V'i.ASHIN(;TOf\~ 'T;-<\
FOR HI "
PPESEF~V;\ rl()t"~j
DEPA~l'i,ENT 0'
ARCH!\I:OlOGj&
HISTO,iC P~ESFR\lATI()tj
3/29/2011
Page 3 of5
Page 4 of5
i.~;.,((.,... """'l\'I"'"
1 ~~~\U I1q~~
I':::!p~ "Il!ll~
I:;s. .... .~~
. :::f ;. ~ .
......~---_. '-_..~_..-
i : 2"1'" /' ;;::: i
'..~... s;:
! ~~"II ~~~~
1,.;:.1\\:.... ,I",' ,':lJj.~".,
D O\VN TOWN
\VALLA \VALLA
I'Ol'!\:I):\TI()N
:....:.w~.~~
SHKSARCH!TFCTS
Walla Walla
SUlprit;e, sUlprise.
~
3/29/2011
Page 5 of5
If you no longer wish to receive these emails. please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link:
"PC:i.'i:'SUIL+
Washington Tmst for Historic Preservation
1204 Minor Ave
Seattle, Washington 98101
US
d [m~Ht!d ull''1g
OOerticalResponse
.;'!.,h! the Vertical Response marketing policy.
3/29/2011