Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ex 26 Exhibits for SEPA Appeal Brief
6/9/26, 8:04 PM Jeffers on County Assessor & Treasurer - Pro perty Details - 20390 NORMAN MO RA N for Year 2025 - 2026 Jenerson County Assessor asurer Property Search Results > 20390 NORMAN MORAN for Year 2025 - 2026 Property Account Prape_rty IQ: rn~@~ITW[;@ 20390 JUN 1 1 2026 Parcel #/Geo ID: Type: Tax Area: Open Space: Historic Propertv; 821081015 Real 0213 - 1-49F1E1H2Ll N N Multi-Family Redevelopment: N Township: Range: Location Address: Neighborhood: Neighborhood CD: Owner Name: Mailing Address: ..... 28N 1E Jefferson County Community Development Mapsco: S8 T28N R1E OUT SIDE MPR (SWANSONVILLE AREA LESS PL PLATS) Map ID: 3325 NORMAN MORAN 41 FLEET DR PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9680 Select the appropriate checkbox next to the year to be paid. Multiple years may be selected. Year - Statement ID 2026 - .9895 (Balance) Tax $629.58 Assessment $31.5.9 Penalty $0.00 Interest Total Due $0.00 $661.17 Abbreviated Legal Description: S8 T & TJ 44 ~ Agent Code: Land Use Code 18 DFL N Remodel Property: N Section: 8 153, Owner ID: % Ownership: 228: 100 Exemptions: Total Amount to Pay: $ •convenience Fee not included Property Tax Information as of 06/09/2026 -;: Amount Due if Paid on: .....,. NW: ff you plan to submit payment on· a future· date, make sure you enter the date and click RECALCULATE to obtain-the correct total amount due. Click on "Statement Details" to expand or collapse a tax statement. First Half Second Half . Year Statement ID Base Amt. Base Amt. Penalty Interest Base Paid Amount Due ► Statement Details 2026 9895 $661.73 $661.17 $0.00 $0.00 $661.73 $661.17 ► Statement Details 2025 9918 $678.29 $677.70 $0.00 $0.00 $1355.99 $0.00 ► Statement Details 2024 9943 $604.98 $604.38 $0.00 $0.00 $1209.36 $0.00 ► Statement Details https://trueweb.jeffcowa.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2025&prop_id=20390 t::,,J< • A 1/4 Ex 26ZON2025-00011 6/9/~6, 8:04 PM 2023 9962 Jefferson County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 20390 NORMAN MORAN for Year 2025 - 2026 $566.32 $565. 72 $0.00 $0.00 $1132.04 $0.00 1--1•1e (+) Improvement Homesite Value: + (+) Improvement Non-Homesite Value: + (+) Land Homesite Value: + (+) Land Non-Homesite Value: (+) Curr Use (HS): (+) Curr Use (NHS): (=) Market Value: (-) Productivity Loss: (=) Subtotal: (+) Senior Appraised Value: (+) Non-Senior Appraised Value: (=) Total Appraised Value: (-) Senior Exemption Loss: (-) Exemption Loss: + + + $0 $24,641 $0 $138,688 $0 $0 $0 $0 = $163,329 $0 = + + = $163,329 $0 $163,329 ·------------ $163 ,329 $0 $0 (=) Taxable Value: = $163,329 ••r" l11ri<;cH"+-~""I Owner: NORMAN MORAN % Ownership: 100.0000000000% Total Value: $163,329 Tax Area: 0213 - 1-49F1E1H2L1 Levy Code Description CE COUNTY CURRENT EXPENSE CNTYDD PUD1 STATE STATE2 Levy Rate 0.9034619479 DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 0.0052121823 CNTYVET VETERANS RELIEF 0.0052777810 MENTAL MENTAL HEALTH 0.0052121823 ROADS COUNTY ROADS 0.7415066410 ROADSCU COUNTY ROADS TO CUR EXP 0.0000000000 HOSP2CASH HOSP DIST #2 GENERAL SCH49CP SCHOOL DIST #49 CAP PROJ SCH49MO SCHOOL DIST #49 EP & 0 CONSERVE CONSERVATION FUTURES EMS1 FIRE DIST#l EMS FD1 FIRE DIST #1 GENERAL LIB1 LIBRARY DIST #1 GENERAL PORTPT PORT OF PT GENERAL .PORTPTIDD PORT OF PT lDD 2019 PUD #1 GENERAL STATE SCHOOL PART 1 STATE SCHOOL PART 2 Total Tax Rate: 0.0536075306 0.6279093905 0.6376483602 0.0275621078 0.4679948282 1.2171942929 0.2868827388 0.1134941229 0.2577346.692 0.0597888892 1.4940692947 0.8050170049 7.7095739644 Appraised Value $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 $163,329 https://trueweb.jeffcowa.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2025&prop_id=20390 Taxable Value Estimated Tax $163,329 $147.56 $163,329 $0.85 $163,329 $0.86 $163,329 $0.85 $163,329 $121.11 $163,329 $0.00 $163,329 $8.76 $163,329 $102.56 $163,329 $104.15 $163,329 $4.50 $163,329 $76.44 $163,329 $198.80 $163,329 $46.86 $163,329 $18.54 $163,329 $42.10 $163,329 $9.77 $163,329 $244.02 $163,329 $131.48 2/4 61912.6, 8:04 PM Jefferson County As ses sor & Treasure r - Pro perty Details - 20390 NORM AN M ORA N fo r Year 2025 - 2026 Taxes w /Current Exem pti ons: Taxes w /o Exem pti ons: $1,259.21 $1,259.21 lrrmrovem / A.11jlriin Improvement #1: Residential Bldg State Code: 19 0.0 sq ft Value: $24,641 Sub Type Description Class Class Ye~r Area CD CD Built GDET Detached Garage 3 ADON Addition (Table Not Dep) 1 * * 1982 768.0 1982 576.0 Sketch 32ft 32ft ADDN rea: 576 fF] I✓ , ..... ~,~ .i:,. - - 00 ~' - _, ('I GDET [Area: 768 iP] 32ft 32ft Property Im https://truew eb.jeffcow a.us/property acce ss/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2025&prop_id=20390 3/4 < , f!/9/i6, 8:04 PM ----· Jefferson County Assessor & Treasurer - Property Details - 20390 NORMAN MORAN for Year 2025 - 2026 .1,~,q,;~, .. ~ u v,;. _i<:"\ P ~.1 ~10 :,qo l ~ri # Type Description Acres Sqft Eff Front Eff Depth # Lots Market Value Prod. Value 1 3325-13 74S 1.0000 43560.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 $88,000 $0 2 1575A 5.1200 223027.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 $50,688 $0 - --- Rnll V ::1 lu e H istor Year Improvements Land Market Current Use Total Appraised Taxable Value 2026 N /A N/A N /A N/A N/A 2025 $24,641 $13 8,688 $0 $163,329 $163,329 2024 $24,641 $13 8,688 $0 $163,329 $163,329 2023 $23,570 $123,520 $0 $147,090 $147,090 2022 $22,498 $11 8,4 00 $0 $140,898 $140,898 s Historv # Deed Type Description Grantor G rantee Volum e Page Sa~e Excise Deec Date Price Num ber Num 1 12/03/2003 W O W arranty Deed M O RA N , BETTY J ESTATE M O RA N , N O RM A N 0 0 $0.00 99023 0 2 12/03/2003 W O W arra nty D eed M O RAN, BETTY J/ESTATE M O RAN, NO RMAN 0 0 $0.00 99351 0 - 0-.,,n,,t fa.- .... -""_,..,"""+ No payout information available .. Asssssor Hom,' Page Ireasurer Horne Pc1ge countv f\/lJP'> Permits ')i<;cla,rner Wc•bs1·,0 vervrcu: ).Cl '.,O 10 04 D;- · <1b,1s I_,\, upc': tu1 011. (/9/202', 1) l& N vl https://trueweb.jeffcowa.us/propertyaccess/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2025&prop_id=20390 ~) N t·l;,n j--; C <:,11puter Corpor;, ir.)n 4/4 DIIC Lana ecoro DCD Deen Do Do ~ - EB ~~ .. ~ _.., II] T AocJress. Ow~e: er PIN o_. ] ·•\" ,,,_ .... - ' - :7-, .. ; -., ;i ... : ,;< ••• .., 0 ; - ------,.---- • r·,... il . -~~ ~:- .:.~:~-; "' ,,. ~- .· . ~c: ~,; . , .-- . -·•·~ '.. .--: , -~- -~ . ~-r -~ r..;~t' -~-: . ; ~. :·. ·;_~ t. _,. ·.: .. -., . ...., 't,;r,_.. ~ . . . . - • . i ,_,.. -©'.ii> • • ·• .{ :4\' .;,~~,,,. ''.. r.., v ~' l1 r• ) ; . ' . , ,,. .' , ,· . , ~·· " . ... -~ _/ . .· . ' , ~ - / . ., ,- ' ~ - - · .. -~ ~ .• ···. ,, ,._cwr,:· • .• , r -, ' . ~ .·.. ·:'!" . ;, ·• "': ,i, '!·· . ; ... - • . ' * \I ,.._· .,.., . ' . f _., { • • f .. · r_~:;,,..,g . ,:~•.'·· r;'_ """;'~ "I~ ., . .-:~ ··' > . .;,•, ..;.;:it_,. - :' -·~--,., ... ~~- •·:. :-'_: :- . ~ •? to&.;~ ; .... "6t.-.- ~ ._ I 1'~~ . , - . ....._ ._ . 1: f«~\, '· --~ ·-~V':1,( ~·;:tt~. ·.t.- .. t .. · r-1 . . - ' "'-• .. - • :• .... 1- -~ ■ .. '·•.~·,;;/' . , • T - ·. A ~cl> g 7:41 PM 6nt2026 View of Critical Areas: Wetlands (Blue areas) Soils (White outline) f:-X.1!, ,.._ 0 %<;]> g 7:39PM 6fi/2026 View showing proposed lot 0 ·- • •• '"' r, • e •. • .. •• . := ~ ■■ f!;,O .. * -A r-- • - , . . . ·' - ·'\, ,,, ,,. j r/fll'! •. . ~- .. ~ . . . j. - ~ + -Y 82108101-5 X 0,, •~ • r · .'-,_ ~· / ; ~- · ",_ •r •r·l""·· \l ~'t.w':. ~- ~ ..... ~. --~•• ' - ' . •. "' ..... ,_:; .• • ~ •.• • . -~-/. ~: . .". _,. "·· .:.. ~ ' - E.:",. < ,(;;, •"'' . . . "', "'r\' \i,, ~. ~-.· .. ,, 11111'" ~- . ., ... ..;.. .• .. f ~ .. ., .. ,·' ' '. ,.,.. :· .:• ~ .. , :: ·,: ~ ;, .. • . : . , . ..,. .., . ;_\ ;-~ .. " ~w;... . ..:. ~-:.. - ',// ..... ..,.• '..,._-- ... ./• A_ ... - . . ·, ... _ ¥- t1 -- _,.;.;,•t7 ~ "·t, ,_ , t .,-'. · ..... ~ ---.,,.____· •• . • .. 'ii-· ' .- .• •• ·.- ",. ..,_ ..,,,., . ' 4. ... - '!s-' 0-.;_ - ":ti-., ·;;. ·"'l·· ·, _,. .. • -----:o.-. >·. :,• •~•: - . r-a·. • I..._ . . · ~-.." - ~ .._ . ·- "'\.,nr>-, i· .,··· .. .. .... ... ~· -- ~;. ,, .. ' • - •. ,. • " -J . "" • • ,... -t • ,, \ii.: • ~~t ..., r- .. :_t· :,- ., . , ~ • ·. "1 -.~. ·1-:. - : ·- - .• .·•~ .,.. ... ,-:- ·• .. ,: - ,_,._.;• 11" . . 7- . oll,t'.. , • I _,._ • : • • ,.._ ~•. 'I:."-.·· - • •_ .., r. . . ~ 0 • j .J. ,,,. ... - "' ,. ,,_,;--· ~ ~. .-, _-/'.'\~;,' .: .. ,. ' ~ ~- . ,_ .. ,...: -~ t, .... • .!"' .. r - .~-t' ,.. -, - p . .. .. , ._ - ")"' • "li'i, · : ,· - ~ •. :(?, ·: , ' ;Y ' ~ -°'~ f , · _ _ . ~•••@ID -~._ ,..._ .. t . . . ~·. . .. ·_•. ·- . • . . ·- J ~ .., ,,, . <S.. : ...,__ .,.._, ~ ..; · ·- · · . ; ""' I · - · - · &1 f·-' · f'-. ~ .... ·r,· ,, :-\;' ... "' 1 -~ -:~t ~ .· -~- _j y .... , ~ -: • ,'~ • ., •_ - I. . 1r~~- ;,t ".. • " . .· ~....:.........., .. ~ ,l ,"T ,. . ,· ... t :.;' ...... .. J ..... - .· . ., ' f ~ t· rl~ .. : -" l•c:... · ~-• fxl TaxParcel:821081015 '>' _;.·~.!!"· ~. 'I:.- , VY i ot i \V 11;'-- -, .· • ., . ' ... ·•-""'5.il,a, , ... \: -· /. ~ L- ..• ·-. i.. ... ~ - _......__ . .,,.. -~- . . l 011c Lana rcecora DCD . -~- . \ ♦• '., 4.---~ .. ·. 0 A '9' ¢ • 7:33 PM Gn/2026 View showing proposed tower location (Red bullseye) P u b lic L a n d R e c o rd s DCD Ooen Data Po m ~ .. .._,.. .. ,,e ~ ~ _,, ~l a .. ~.; ,:' ; '" ~ ' . . ... ,. .... ~- - '..-,. . . .. , · ... • ' ... -·~_- . .; -t .. -1 -· . . : .. ,, ... : ', . "\.......... .... .. _ •:· .. ~ ... .... \--~ .. --""' '°"' . ...,., .... ~. ~ .... ~-- ~ •~ ·--~. . . ,, - .... "'· -v ,;, ~ • ... . . ~~ ~> :. . .., u:~ .. :~. ~ • :- ~~ or82108 e: .,, 1· -~ .. :..; ·; ,, .... - .\.""".· .• • .. ::!;~, '.' r -~~:' 1"'~•,... • .·, :· . .,,.., , ... J~••,. ,-·T ... . ·.•. -~· . ' r.. ~-· .,,. "M . . .. - . . . . . ~ r:: ,:.:.t.. . , • .4 \ ·1··• r1" I,. " T'.J 1.t?? " ...,,,,,..., . . ' • ...,; . f"l ·- ./_ . " .. '•. \. . ..J 'V'_ ~ • t~ ·# .. • . . .. _ .• • _• !"' - • '"t., •....,. ,.;._ •,,-,,;:-r:-. ~ . i ,fif~~p- ,, . ,· . - ' , ·-" • ' ii; ,I, ,, ,-' ·•JI', ..• tt-:~~- ,, . lJ'.r- .• -r ~......:. ..~ ·. . ~ Alli .J • .,•~ :!: ,. - - "/JI -- 1· . . [!] {d: ;.!!,n I Feet(US)• Measurement Result 592.9 Feet {US) ■ r.;,.. Tax Parcel: 821081015 ')' \C,I 1ofl \.cl '------_..:;,. ,'------~ - f .:. ',/ ·- t~ ,~~ °\~:'.. ~ ' .. ~~,,.. I ·\ . .·; ~M-·~ .. .. rJ I ~. ·~ ...... - .- _:-. ' -~ ?J.,:· ...... - .. f .. ,.~ ... ,.,..... -- . . t ·-·, -· •·-· 1 ~ -1 Pr ess CTRL to enaete sna pping Distance from tower location to nearest protected wetland Click a point on the map to get the elevation at that location Elevation (feet): 421.19 Elevation (meters): 128.38 - A ~ cj, • 6:47 PM 6(1/2026 Elevation of pro posed tow er C lic k a p o in t o n th e m a p to g e t th e e le v a tio n a t th a t lo c a tio n Lo n g itu d e : -1 2 2 .6 9 8 E lev ati o n (fee t ): 377.87 Elevation (meters): 115.18 ri.rl A '9'~•. 6:49PM 6/7/2026 Elevation of nearest pro tected wetland Nearest pro tected wetland is 43 feet low er than pro posed tower I Feet (US) • Measurement Result 854. 9 Feet (U S} ml rid- A "9'<l1. 6:56 PM 6/7 /2 026 Distance from pro posed tow er to second-nearest w etland, w ithin the critical soils resource area C lick a point on the m ap to get the elevation at that location Latitu de: 47.937 Longitude: -122.696 Elevation (feet ): 421.7 5 Elevation (meters): 128.55 at A ~ ~ . 6:59 PM 6/7/2026 Elevation of proposed tower Public Land Records Click a point on the map to get the elevation at that location Latitude: 47.936 Longitude: -122.699 Elevation (feet): 364 . 93 Elevation (meters): 111.23 m,, . "' "'§"~. 7:00 PM Gn/2026 Elevation of second-nearest pro tected wetland Second-nearest pro tected w etland is 57 feet low er than proposed tower I Feet (US) ,. M easure m ent Result 886.4 Feet (U S) ri6 " ~¢- 6:52 PM 6nno2& Distance from proposed tower to third-nearest protected wetland Click a point on the map to getthe elevation at that location Longitude:-122.696 Elevation (feet): 422.18 Elevation (meters): 128.68 .,,,. . A <§" ¢ • 6:54 PM Gfl/2026 Elevation of proposed tower C lic k a p o in t o n th e m a p to g e t th e e le v a tio n a t th a t lo c a tio n Latitu d e : 4 7 .9 3 7 lo n g itu d e : -1 2 2 .6 9 9 E le v a t io n (f ee t ): 3 7 3 .5 0 E le v a t io n (m et e rs ): 1 1 3 .8 4 o A '%"¢. 7:07 PM 6/7/2026 Elevation of third-nearest protected w etland Third-nearest pro tected wetland is 48 feet low er than proposed tower tl I Feet (US) ... Measurement Result 73 9 .1 Feet (U S ) ........ ~, 1 "':J Preis CTR L to enable snapping ii; A ~<l•. 9:16PM 6fl/2026 Distance to nearest protected critical soils resource area C lic k a p o in t o n th e m a p to g e t th e e le vatio n at th at lo catio n La titu de: 47.937 Longitu de: -122 .696 Eleva tion (feet): 420.83 Elev ation (m eters ): 128.27 - A ~~ it.I) 9:34 PM 6fl /2 026 Elevation of proposed tower Click a point on the map to get the elevation at that location Latitude: 47.937 Longitude: -122.699 Elevation (feet): 378.06 Elevation (meters): 115.23 A ":§"¢. 9:37 PM 6/7/2026 Elevation of nearest pro tected critical soils resource area Nearest pro tected critical soils resource area is 43 feet low er than pro posed tow er \· . ,. ~ ~ 1 ~. • ·1· . . .. 0 + !° ..,.. 821081015 X 0.. . ··~ r-· ; • • ~--· ,.,r L, -...._~.'-:'_ .;,...f •• - __ -::. ..... . I ' •~- 6 ~ ~ • ,r"'\....., - ~ ~•·. ,. ' • 'T 'I ~ l .. 1' r r '°.- r. ; - ti"' Show sea.~ch resu'ts 'or 821081 ~ :: ti ,._ ,W ~- ./: ,. · • ~ · ,\. 4 • ~ ? - ... '·~· • -. "·' 'it~ . , • ·" .. "1' ~-' .~~ ~• .,,., :x.::· • -- . •. ---'-o. ·:. ·.•·,,/-:.,t:"f" " ·1· .ii"' ~''"f 'f ,. "' ! • ;, ~~• ·_0 .. 1· •·:·~.: _ . .,_--;:~·.-,.,.- . · •t~ .:·. ~,- r~ 14i ,-·:·:;r..~,!"'f_; . . . . '(•' ' . . '•i. ,.... ;:, ~ . • ., 1 .-.· • ,... • • • "' fl t ·"'" .... - ,. ,. \ _. ·~ f' p - ,. . : •• ...... ...-.....,-..1 - - ..,t. . r... ~ ~ JI ' .. , , , •• ,1 ·=-- . r ~.: f. - :. '¼ .• ' ~- ,,_ 'I .. ~- , .• .,/ • • ._, .,, · .. ,· ., . ·" /11:t·'~ r. • -c...,.. ~- , :! . . .. • .... -·------- . . f ~: -:'fl "' • . • 1· .. "' ... _ ~- .. ·. . ' ·-- ------ . ..... I .,, M ,• . . I':'• ·..,4..,_ . . ~- -- ·---- .. . .. , I -..t. ·---1 -~ i·:::: .. _ • V •• ~----.-~-,----~- _•/ • a· J .-·· -· . . ' ·~-'----;~. . . . "" . , . ~ . :' ~ ,. ... -. ~- . . . @ Tax Parcel: 821081015 (2) ~- ·. *. ,..' ' ~ .'~~_fl• : • 1of1 ~ , •. .,.. ~- . ~- '·1· ......... ~.-- ... ;.r,; ' . L. . . -. - . ,. - - ..,~ . . . .. . r . . . ) -"'W',. ... •. • - I ';· •. ·-· ·,. ,~-- . '.¥ .,-:- ' - •·1 •• :r-. I - ";_;I L....,____: .I '-.~ -> - .... .. ·,-......... .,.,_,. ~- . ., . -.- " . . . . . ,,,,,.,. . ... . ~ - . ...,., (- . . •. . -~ ' ~ ' tJ,~,; '"~;~ ·. . ~ ... t ~t·•-liii' ' '1 /.93 /0 1 17.1 69 13 :l Deq rees . ;- · ,r _ _ _ · __ · ,iii --" . .· ' ~- .· □ C:1110 KC □ra DCD ~ EE ~lr-J ~ ~ _,. G I Feet (US) ... Measu rem ent Re sult 1,130 Feet (US) f. ~ • -; vo, n.v, I ·71 Press CTRL ,o enable sn.ppins 0 -a.:, A -0 ~ Q> g 8'.l8PM 6nt2026 C li c k a p o in t o n t h e m a p t o g e tt h e e le v a t io n a t t h a t lo c a t io n lo n g itu d e : -1 2 2 .6 9 6 E l e v a t io n (fe e t ): 4 2 1.0 1 E l e v a ti o n (m et e rs ): 1 2 8 .3 2 - " ~~- azs PM 6fl /2 026 Elevation of proposed tower C lic k a p o in t o n t h e m a p to g e t t h e e le v a t io n a t t h a t lo c a t io n Longitude: -122.691 Elevation (feet): 322.20 Elevation (meters): 98.21 ~ ,.._ 8:23 PM '9' ~ g en /2026 Elevation of seco nd-nearest pro tected critical soils resource area Seco nd-nearest pro tected critical soils resource area is 99 feet low er than pro posed tow er C, !; gis.ecology.wa.gov/ponal/apps/webappv,ewer/index hunl>,d =6 I 6124573214451692109e 1 e2971 b548 * 1!11~ (' ... D Blyn Pen1n.su(a .1f;-ij lNll'Otlf u,11, On.c~f.l)Bay 8•9 ,udder H,11 • \ ~~ Ch,m,nvl'I 17 061o:6,:,y -,~,,.,'I. @ Search rest!~ 1 (2) Swans{!.t•lle Port ludlow .-iustln H.i11svilt9 ta119ley U'>t"!enB.ly 'illl(t"f>ilf .. l"Toptrty 6 Posses: 15 Lillie Ooston ouncene Es11, NASA, NGA. USGS j lsland,C0un!)', W/\ State P.J1ks GIS. Esri, Tom Torn, Gar nun, SafaGraph,-;· :.\.1,-rl £d, 61 v> i"t- 0 a 1:18PM ti .,.,, c]J I[) 6/10/2026 ~x.C ;: ~ ~ ~ Hydrologic Soil Group-Jefferson County Area, Washington (821801015) ;: ~ ;., ... 9 5:12210 5Z13X) 522300 52'.!4IIJ 5225/0 522lBl = 5Z2B40 522llJ:) = 0 ,uo 56'22"N m I i I tt\ ~ 0 ! Ii! ~ 47" 56'4"N I 147" 56'22"N I i I ! Ii! ~ 147" 56'4"N 5:12210 52ZIX) 522300 52'.!4IIJ 522510 522lBl = 5Z2B40 522llJ:) = ;: !;: ~ 9 N A ~ Scale : 1:3,920 if l'.JirdB:I on A lancls'.ape (11" x BS') sheet. ----=====--------=======Meles 0 SJ 100 2D an ---====-------=======fee: 0 1Sl an en OOJ ~ µujem:n : V.tb Meroir:r Ccrner cxxrtli'Be;: WGS84 Edge ocs: lJIM Zroe lON WGS84 ;: ~ ;., ... 9 USDA Natural Resources 7EF Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/10/2026 Page 1 of 4 H y d ro log ic S o il G ro u p-J efferso n Co unty Area, Washington (821801015) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION A re a of Interest (A O I} ..---, "---' Area of Interest (AOI) S o ils S o ll Rati ng P o ly go ns D A D AID DB D BID D C D CID D D D Not rated or not available Soll Rating Lines .-.; A .-.; AID B BID C CID D ,. " Not rated or not available Soil Rat ing P oints II A ■ AID C B BID C C CID D C Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Tra nspo rta tion f-++ Rails _,,, Interstate Highways ,,...- US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Back grou nd • Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 24, Aug 28, 2025 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1 :50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 31, 2022-Aug 8, 2022 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources ""5iiii Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/10/2026 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group-Jeffers on County Area, W ashington 821801015 Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres In AOI Percent of AOI AIC Alderwood gravelly B 60.1 88.0% sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes Mu Mukilteo peat, 8/D 0.1 0.2% moderately shallow variant SIB Swantown gravelly D 8.1 11.8% sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 68.3 100.0% USDA ali Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soll Survey 6/10/2026 Page 3 of 4 H y dro lo g lc S o il G roup -J e ff ers o n C o u n ty A rea , W ash ing to n 8218010 15 Description H ydro lo g ic soil gro up s are based on estim ates of runoff potential. S oils are assig ne d to one of fo ur gro ups according to the rate of w ater infiltration w hen the so ils are no t protected by vegetation, are thoroughly w et, and receive precip itation from long-d uration storm s. T he soils in the U n ited S tates are assigned to fo ur groups (A , B , C , and D ) and three dual cla sses (AI D , B/D , and C /D ). T he groups are defined as fo llow s: G roup A . Soils ha ving a high infiltration rate {low runoff potential) w hen tho rough ly w et. T he se consist m ainly of deep, w ell drained to excessively draine d sa nd s o r gravelly sa nds. T hese soils have a high rate of w ater transm ission. G roup B . S oils ha ving a m o derate infiltration rate w hen thoroughly w et. T hese co nsist chie fly of m oderate ly deep or deep, m oderately w ell drained or w ell draine d so ils tha t ha ve m o derately fine texture to m oderately coarse texture. T he se soils ha ve a m o de rate rate of w ater transm ission. G ro up C . S oils ha ving a slo w infiltration rate w hen thoro ughly w et. T hese consist chiefly of so ils ha ving a la yer that im pedes the dow nw ard m ovem ent of w ater or so ils of m oderate ly fine texture or fine texture. T hese soils have a slow rate of w ate r tra nsm issio n . G ro up D . S oils having a ve ry slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) w hen tho roughly w et. T he se co nsist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-sw ell pote ntia l, soils tha t ha ve a high w ater table, soils that have a claypan or clay la ye r at or near the surf ace , and soils that are shallow over nearly im perv ious m a teria l. T he se so ils have a very slow rate of w ater transm ission. If a so il is assig ne d to a dual hydro logic group {AI D , B/D , or C /D ), the first letter is for draine d areas and the se co nd is for undrained areas. O nly the soils that in the ir na tural co nd ition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. R ating O ptions Aggregation M ethod: D om inant C ondition Com ponent Percent Cutoff: None Specifi ed Tie-break Rule: H igher USDA Natural Res ources :iiilii Conse rv ation Serv ice W e b S o ll S u rv ey N a tio na l C o o p e rative So il S urv ey 6/10/2026 Page 4 of 4 OSHA FactSheet Lithium-ion Battery Safety Lithium-ion batteries are one type of rechargeable battery technology (other examples include sodium ion and solid state) that supplies power to many devices we use daily. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the manufacturing and industrial use of these batteries due to their superior energy storage characteristics. This increased use of lithium-ion batteries in workplaces requires an increased understanding of the health and safety hazards associated with these devices. The hazards and controls described below are important in facilities that manufacture lithium-ion batteries, items that include installation of lithium-ion batteries, energy storage facilities, and facilities that recycle lithium-ion batteries. Lithium-ion Batteries A lithium-ion battery contains one or more lithium cells that are electrically connected. Like all batteries, lithium battery cells contain a positive electrode, a negative electrode, a separator, and an electrolyte solution. Atoms or molecules with a net electric charge (i.e., ions) are transferred from a positive electrode to a negative electrode thro ugh an electrolyte solution. Lithium cells store and release power by converting chemical potential energy into electrical energy using lithium ions or lithium metal. Electrolyte solutions allow ions to flow freely between the electrodes. There are several types of lithium cells, including cylindrical cells, prismatic pouch cells, and prismatic metal can cells. Lithium-ion batteries use lithium in ionic form instead of in solid metallic form and are usually rechargeable, often without needing to remove the battery from the device. They power devices such as mobile telephones, laptop computers, tablets, cameras, power tools, electric vehicles, and machinery, and are also used in large Energy Storage Systems (ESS). Potential Hazards Lithium-ion batteries may present several health and safety hazards during manufacturing, use, emergency response, disposal, and recycling. These hazards can be associated with the chemicals used in the manufacture of battery cells, stored electrical energy, and hazards created during thermal runaway, (see below) which can include fire, explosions, and chemical byproducts. Chemical Hazards Lithium-ion batteries contain various components that present different chemical hazards to workers, such as flammability, toxicity, corrosivity, and reactivity hazards. These chemicals may enter the workplace as raw materials or recycled materials. As processes change, any new chemicals must be thoro ughly assessed for potential safety and health impacts to the workplace and workers. A lithium-ion battery cathode is made of a lithium metal oxide material. The choice of cathode material depends on the desired characteristic of the battery. These materials can include lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO), lithium manganese oxide (LiMnp ), lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (LiNiMnCoO), lithium nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (LiNiCoAIO), or lithium iron phosphate (LiFePOJ ex.I=. C ommon materials for a lithium-ion battery a n o d e in c lu d e ca rb o n -b ased m ate rials such a s grap h e n e , na n o fi b e rs, carb o n na n o tu b e s, gra p hite, an d titanium-based materials such as lith iu m titan a te an d titan iu m dio x id e . Li th iu m -io n batt erie s co ntain ele ctro ly tes that a re a co m b in atio n of so lv en ts w ith a n e le ctro ly tic sa lt. Li th iu m hex afl u o ro p h o sp h ate, th e m o st co m m o n sa lt use d in lithiu m -io n ce lls, can react w ith w a ter to fo rm hy d ro g e n fl u o rid e (H F ). T he m o st co m m o n so lv ents use d in lithiu m -io n batterie s in clu d e e thy le n e carb o n ate (E C ), pro p y le n e ca rb o n ate (P C ), d im e thy l carb o n ate (D M C ), e thy l m e thy l ca rb o n ate (E M C ), an d d ie thy l carb o n ate (D E C ). S o m e of the se e le ctro ly tes a re fl a m m a b le liq u id s a n d req u irem e n ts w ithin O S H A's P ro cess S afe ty M an ag e m e n t sta n d a rd m ay a p p ly to qu a ntitie s e xceed in g 10 ,0 0 0 lb . M a n y of th e ch e m icals use d in lith iu m -io n batt ery m a n u fa ctu rin g hav e be e n in tro d u ced relativ ely rece n tly . C o n seq u e n tly , th e re m ay be lim ited to x ico lo g ical in fo rm atio n a n d fe w e sta b lish e d O S H A pe rm issib le ex p o su re lim its (P E L s). A d d itio n a lly , be cau se so m e of O S H A 's P E Ls m ay be o u td ated a n d in ad e q u ate fo r pro tectin g w o rker h e alth, em p lo y ers sh o u ld co n sid e r a lte rn ativ e o ccu p atio n a l e x p o su re lim its (O E L s) dev elo p ed by tech n ical, pro fessio n a l, in d u stria l an d /o r go v ern m e n t o rg a n izatio n s to en su re w o rker pro tectio n . Fo r che m icals w itho u t o ccu p atio n al e x p o su re lim its, O ccu p atio n a l E x p o su re B an d in g an d C o ntro l B a n d in g can be used w ith th e H ie rarchy of C o ntro ls to m a n a g e risks a n d prev en t e x p o su re to h azard o u s ch e m ica ls. S ee the N IO S H C o n tro l B an d in g w eb p ag e an d th e O S H A P erm issib le E x p o su re Li m its - A n n o tate d Tab le s fo r a d d itio n a l in fo rm atio n an d ex p la n atio n . A d d itio n a ll y , w h e n a lith iu m -io n batt ery o r ce ll do e s n o t m e e t ex e m p tio n s un d e r O S H A 's H a zard C o m m u n icatio n S ta n d a rd (H C S ) as an "a rtic le ," the m a n u fa ctu rer o r im p o rter is req u ired to cla ssify the ch e m ical ha zard s a n d p ro v id e th e h azard in fo rm atio n to do w n stre a m use rs. Fo r a d d itio n a l in fo rm a tio n , see O S H A 's Lett ers of In terp re tatio n reg a rd in g the C o v e rag e of lith iu m - io n ba tt erie s un d e r th e H a zard C o m m u n icatio n s S tan d ard (6 /23 /20 2 1) an d A p p licab ility of th e H C S to Li th iu m -io n B att erie s (12 /1/20 22 ). S a fe ty H a z a rd s In a d d itio n to ele ctrical h azard s, lith iu m -io n batt eries can also prese nt hazard s resu ltin g fr o m the rm a l ru n aw ay . B ecau se lithiu m -io n batterie s co m b in e a fl a m m ab le ele ctro ly te w ith a sig n ifi can t am o u n t of sto red en e rgy, the rm a l ru n aw ay reactio n s are po ssib le . T h e rm a l ru n aw ay is a ch ain reactio n w h e re the h e at rele ase d fr o m th e failu re of o n e ce ll da m ag e s ne arb y ce lls. T his can be in itiated by in tern al sho rt circu itin g du e to d efe cts d u rin g m a n u factu rin g , m e ch a n ical da m a g e to the batt ery, ex p o su re to excessiv e h e a t or co ld , a n d im p ro p er ch argin g . T h e rm a l ru n aw a y can be id e ntifi e d b y sev eral in d icato rs in c lu d in g a rise in batt e ry te m p e ra tu re, ven tin g of gas, vap o r, or sm o ke fr o m the batt ery, o r th e prese n c e of fi re . F ires cau se d by the rm a l ru n aw ay can pro d u ce ad d itio n al ch e m ica l ha zard s that m ay in cl u d e h y d ro g e n flu o rid e (H F ), h y d ro g e n ch lo rid e (H C I), hy d ro g e n cy an id e (H C N ), p h o sp h o ry l fl u o rid e (P O F3 ), carb o n m o n o x id e (C O ), ca rb o n dio x id e (C O 2), b la ck ca rb o n , an d oth e r po te n tia ll y haza rd o u s ch e m ica ls an d pa rticu lates. Fo r a d d itio n a l in fo rm atio n se e O S H A 's S afe ty a n d H e alth In fo rm atio n B u ll etin o n P re v en tin g Fire a n d /o r E x p lo sio n Inju ry fr o m S m a ll a n d W earab le Li th iu m B att e ry P ow e re d D ev ices. S a fe ty b y D e s ig n W heth e r m a n u factu rin g o r usin g lithiu m - io n batt erie s, a n ticip atin g an d de sig n in g o ut w o rkp lace h azard s early in a pro ce ss a d o p tio n o r a pro ce ss cha n g e is o n e of the best w a y s to pre v ent inju rie s a n d ill n esses. H aza rd co ntro ls m u st be ad d ressed in the in itial de sig n an d co n stru ctio n ph ases, as w ell as im p le m e nted th ro ug h ch a n g e s to m a n a g e m e nt a n d m a n ufa ctu rin g pro cesse s a s pro d u ctio n m etho d s a n d e n e rgy sto rag e tech n o lo g ie s e v o lv e. S afe ty by de sig n in clu d e s th e pro activ e su b stitu tio n a n d a d o ptio n of le ss hazard o u s tech n o lo g ie s. S e e the N IO S H w eb p ag e , P rev entio n th ro u g h D esig n , fo r a d d itio n al info rm atio n . S a fe ty a n d H e a lth M a n a g e m e n t S y s te m E stab lish in g a safe ty an d h e alth m a n ag e m e n t sy stem (S H M S ) (i.e., safe ty pro g ra m ) is a n e ffe ctiv e w a y of pro tectin g w o rkers fr o m po tential h azards a sso ciated w ith lith iu m -io n batteries. A mature and effective SHM S can prevent w orkplace injuries and illnesses by using pro active approaches to find and fix workplace hazards befo re they cause injury and illness to w orkers. To be effective, the SHM S must have meaningful worker engagem ent and participation. In many w orkplaces, w orker participation may include a safety com m ittee that can bring workers and managem ent together to identify and find solutions, and to promote safety and health. See the OSHA webpage Recom m ended Practices fo r Safety and Health Pro gra m s fo r additional info rmation on im plementing a successful SHM S or program . Hazard Controls Lithium-ion battery hazard controls should be implemented according to the Hierarchy of Controls. Controlling hazards at the source is the most effective method to eliminate or reduce hazards .. OSHA's Transitioning to Safer Chemicals Toolkit is a step-by-step resource with information, methods, tools, and guidance for employers and workers to proactively reduce or eliminate chemical hazards at the source through informed substitution. Additionally, hazard controls that can be implemented in workplaces that manufacture or use lithium-ion batteries include: • Ventilation, including local exhaust ventilation (LEV) and enclosures • Process automation and isolation of hazardous materials • Storage of lithium-ion batteries and devices in dry, cool locations • Following National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) guidance for the installation of Energy Storage Systems • Following manufacturer's instructions for storage, use, charging, and maintenance of lithium-ion batteries • Limiting the quantity of stored lithium-ion batteries • Following the manufacturer's guidance on how to extinguish small battery fires • Continuous monitoring for flammable and toxic gases in large storage locations • Using shipping guidance provided by the US Department of Transportation and International Air Transport Association (IATA) and following proper shipping and packaging requirements provided in 49 CFR 173.185 • Disposing of lithium-ion batteries and devices containing these batteries, at designa_ted recycling facilities and not placing them in municipal trash or recycling bins • Not mixing battery types (e.g. lithium-ion, alkaline, lead acid) in recycling facilities • Providing safety showers and eyewash stations in locations where exposure to electrolytes may occur • Developing and implementing an emergency response plan, including emergency procedures, and creating training for response personnel that addresses possible physical and chemical hazards, including hazardous decomposition products (e.g., hydrogen fluoride) • Conducting a hazard assessment and using proper personal protective equipment (PPE), when appropriate Training Education and training are important tools for informing workers and managers about workplace hazards and controls. Workers must be trained in a language and at a literacy level they understand. Appropriate training may include, but is not limited to, Hazard Communication (29 CFR 1910.1200) training, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) (29 CFR 1910.120) training, and Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119) training. OSHA's publication Training Requirements in OSHA Standards provides a general overview of the training requirements in specific OSHA standards. In workplaces with lithium-ion batteries, it is important that employers ensure that an emergency action plan (EAP) includes lithium- related incident response procedures based on the manufacturer's instructions and NFPA guidance for responding to battery failures, including fires and/or explosions caused by thermal runaway, and that workers are trained on these procedures. For workplaces involved in the manufacturing, repair, use, and recycling of lithium-ion batteries, it is important for employers to ensure that exposed workers receive appropriate information about the hazards associated with lithium-ion batteries and that workers receive training on the physical and health hazards associated them. OSHA Standards While there is not a specific OSHA standard for lithium-ion batteries, many of the OSHA general industry standards may apply, as well as the General Duty Clause (Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970). These include, but are not limited to the following standards: • 1910 Subpart L - Fire Protection • 1910 Subpart S - Electrical • 1910.39 Fire Prevention Plans • 1910.119 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals • 1910.120 Hazardous Waste Operation and Emergency Response • 1910.132 Personal Protective Equipment • 1910.134 Respiratory Protection • 1910.147 The Contro l of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tag out) • 1910.151 Medical Services and First Aid • 1910.178 Powered Industrial Trucks • 1910.1000 Air Contaminants • 1910.1020 Access to employee exposure and medical records • 1910.1200 Hazard Communication These standards are also representative of the types of protections that apply to the manufacture and use of other energy storage technology, whether in use now or under development. Consensus/Industry Standards and Programs • National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 855 Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems • International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62281 Safety of Primary and Secondary Lithium Cells and Batteries During Transport • Underwriters Laboratories, UL 2054 Standard for Household and Commercial Batteries • Underwriters Laboratories, UL 9540 Standard for Energy Storage Systems and Equipment • The American Society of Safety Professionals, ANSI/ASSP 210.0 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems • International Organization for Standardization, ISO 45001 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems How to Contact OSHA OSHA's mission is to assure America's workers have safe and healthful working conditions free from unlawful retaliation. For more information, visit www.osha.gov or call OSHA at 1-800-321- OSHA (6742), TTY 1-877 -889-5627. This is one in a series of informational fact sheets highlighting OSHA programs, policies or standards. It does not impose any new compliance requirements. For a comprehensive list of compliance requirements of OSHA standards or regulations, refer to Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. The voice phone is (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY ) number: (877) 889-5627. Q)SfM Occupational Safety and Health Administration DTSEM FS-4480 01/2025 ◄\ 180 Baldwin Lane Port Ludlow, WA 98365 April 3, 2026 Planning@co.jefferson.wa.us Greg Ballard Re: "Mats Mats Cell Tower" ZON2025-00011 Dear Mr. Ballard, Please accept this letter in place of my March 18, 2026 letter as I am providing updated comments on the applicant's (Verizon's) submittals in support of its request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a 150' tall cell tower in the rural residential neighborhood of Port Ludlow. Not in Mats Mats Bay as stated in the Application on page 2. Although there are many statements made by the applicant that are incorrect or misleading to 1) understate the scope of their project and its potential for harm, and 2) overstate the need for additional cell phone coverage in our area, the issues below are to augment significant issues expressed by other residents. 1. Amplified Signal Effects on Public Health and Broadband Internet Service Verizon states: A Radio Frequency (RF) signal will quickly drop off when it must travel through solid obstacles such as tree foliage or buildings. Verizon Wireless is proposing to install Remote Radio Units (RRU's) at the antennas in order to amplify signal levels to improve the quality service for our customers due to degradation of signals due to obstacles (trees and structures) between customers and antennas on the tower. Verizon Wireless has a frequency license in700 MHz, 850MHz, PCS, AWS and C bands. Verizon proposes nine RRUs, however up to three more service providers may add up to 27 antennae and RRUs. a) In response to public health concerns, Verizon provides the following: Slide "General Public & Occupational limits". Exposure levels for the General Public "are averaged over 30 minutes." And assumes the exposed public is passersby on a sidewalk. But we live here, exposures would be 24/7, not 30 minutes. And epidemiological studies almost always have a caveat, that the young, sick, and elderly are more susceptible. The median age of Port Ludlow residents is over 65. b) I've seen statements that as long as a cell tower proposal meets FCC standards, the County is precluded from considering health concerns. However, I believe the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires the County to independently evaluate the SEPA Checklist including potential for harm to its citizens, especially in light of the issues raised above. The SEPA Checklist prepared by the Applicant simply states, "All RF emissions meet FCC guidelines." But are those guidelines based on 2417 exposures to elderly residents, and for the types of amplified signals Verizon is proposing to use? c) RRUs on cell towers can cause broadband internet interference through radio frequency (RF) leakage, improper shielding, or harmonic emissions that overlap with Wi-Fi resulting in slow speeds, increased latency, or total connection loss for home networks. New 5G signals from towers can interfere with sensitive electronics, causing issues like GPS timing failures or VPN drops. Even if Verizon and future additional cell service providers were to promise mitigation, how and who will enforce them? EX.F In Port Ludlow many of us rely on Wave/Astound broadband, and I for one rely on it to telework because it provides the necessary bandwidth, speed and reliability. We don't have fiber in Port Ludlow. Disruption of internet service would be a major impact to Port Ludlow residents who rely on internet for work and other important purposes. d) Cumulative impacts from up to 27 antennae and RRUs must be considered. WAC 197- 11-800 regarding Categorical Exemptions for (25) Wireless service facilities means that future service providers could install additional antennae and RRUs on this cell tower without any additional SEPA review. \/Vh ile the SEPA Checklist does not require evaluation of cumulative impacts, the use of the cell tower by additional cell service providers is "reasonably foreseeable" and their cumulative impacts (not just Verizon's) should be considered by the County in making its various decisions for this tower. 2. Would the Cell Tower Really Benefit Port Ludlow Residents? Verizon did not provide documentation per 18.42.040 Application submittal and content. (I) For all applications that require conditional use review, a written analysis by the applicant, including appropriate analysis by a qualified telecommunications engineer, describing th~roposed location within the geographic service area; the good faith efforts and measures taken to secure a location where the facility would be permitted outright; how and why such efforts were unsuccessful; and, how and why the proposed site is essential to meet service demands for the geographic service area. Verizon's RF Design Analysis under "Objectives" and "Capacity" and "Why is this site important" are all about Verizon not having cell towers within 2 miles. NOT that Port Ludlow residents don't have adequate cell phone service. We do. Verizon states under "Why here?" • Users are experiencing a lack of quality wireless service in the area • This area has a significant gap in service of approximately 3 miles where quality wireless services are not being provided • Significant amount of growth in rural Washington causing more usage on the Wireless Networks • Sites surrounding the proposed need capacity offload • Many of the users' mobiles are reporting low quality connections for multiple carriers However, I have two cell phones, one is personal and one is for work, and the work cell phone service is with Verizon. I have no problem with either cell phone's service. Much of the "Wh y here" statements are generic and could be used as justification anywhere. Verizon has not provided the documentation for taking "measures to secure a location where the facility would be permitted outright; how and why such efforts were unsuccessful; and, how and why the proposed site is essential to meet service demands for the geographic service area." "Open Signal Verizon Quality Map" also only shows where Verizon lacks towers. The maps do not show that cell phone coverage doesn't exist from other providers. But regardless if Verizon's cell tower is built, coverage in our area will continue to have "dead zones" due to the hilly topography (drivers are on winding roads in dips and valleys) and obstacles, including hillsides and dense tree stands that interfere with signal. Where exactly is the "area where quality wireless services are not being provided" by any service provider? The '# r ~► provided maps are vague and misleading because they imply cell phone coverage is lacking, when it is really Verizon towers that are lacking. Wh ich brings me to the project's title. The project location is in Port Ludlow, not "near" Port Ludlow as the project name would suggest. It may be subtle but in your email of February 26, 2026 to interested parties of record, you wrote "the proposed cell tower near Port Ludlow," which demonstrates how the public as well as public officials could be confused by the project title. A person might ask what the reason would be to call it Mats Mats Cell Tower instead of Port Ludlow Cell Tower, but the reason is obvious. Conclusion Verizon's documentation in support of its application for a CUP is generic, flawed, misleading, and incorrect for the reasons discussed above, and the application should be denied. This is about Verizon wanting to get more customers, but we are asking you if Horizon'sNerizon's desire for more business is worth the cost to Port Ludlow residents (e.g. to: health, internet, property value, visual quality) when we don't need a cell tower in the middle of our homes to have satisfactory cell service. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. 1t•' ( ,j.'\.,.,'}.~ Diori Kreske W ednesday, June 1 O, 2026 at 12:56:25 PM Pacific Daylight Tim e Subject: RE: DCD Staff report and Ex Log for Horizon 150' high Monopole (ZON 2025-00011) Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 1 :47:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Greg Ballard To: Diori Kreske It will get added to the record on June 16th. Thanks Greg Ballard (he/his) Jeff er son County DCD Development Code Administrator gballard@co.j.~.f_ferson.wa.us (360) 379-4454 From: Diori Kreske <dlkreske@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 1:17 PM To: Greg Ballard <GBallard@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: Re: DCD Staff report and Ex Log for Horizon 150' high Monopole (ZON 2025-00011) ALERT: BE CAUTIOUS This email originated outside the organization. Do not open attachments or click on links if you are not expecting them. Mr. Ballard, I apologize, my most recent letter is dated April 3, 2026 and replaced the May 1 ath letter. Please upload this one into the record. Thank you, Diori Kreske 180 Baldwin Lane Port Ludlow, WA 98365 (509) 578-0372 From : Diori Kreske <dlkreske@outlook.com> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 1 :14 PM To: Greg Ballard <GBallard@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: DCD Staff report and Ex Log for Horizon 150' high Monopole (ZON 2025-00011) Dear Mr. Ballard, Ex.<=, 1 of 3 ◄ I looked thro ugh the comment letters and did not see my letter of May 18, 2026. If I missed seeing it, please tell me in which group of letters it is located so I might better find it. If it isn't included, please add it. I've attached it again. Thank you, Diori Kreske 180 Baldwin Lane Port Ludlow, WA 98365 (509) 578-0372 From : Greg Ballard <GBallard@co.jefferson.wa.us> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 12:39 PM To: Greg Ballard <GBallard@ co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: DCD Staff report and Ex Log for Horizon 150' high Monopole (ZON 2025-00011) Hello interested parties, attached is the DCD staff report and exhibit log for the above referenced case. Below is information on the hearing and how to see the exhibits. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The all-virtual public hearing before the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday June 16, 2026. To join the meeting: Zoom link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82678751298 Phone: (253) 215-8782, Webinar ID: 826 7875 1298 ,*9 to raise your hand, *6 to unmute To view the case file, including application and staff report, and other hearing materials: go to www.co.jefferson.wa.us - Services - Laserfiche Web portal (username/password: public) - Board of Commissioners - Boards & Committees- Hearing Examiner- 2026- Horizon 150 foot monopole or by visiting Jefferson County's Customer Self-Service Portal: https://selfservice-op.jeffcowa.us/energov_prod/selfservice#/home and entering Case number: ZON2025-00011. The application, reports, and site plans may also be reviewed at the DCD office. The DCD staff report and exhibits will be available by June 2, 2026. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, 621 Sheridan St, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450 or via email to the project contact. PROJECT CONTACT: Greg Ballard, Project Planner.planning.@ co.jefferson.wa.us, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379- 4450 2 of 3