Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM120913o�%J ON c0 G i' \Q 1 IINq District No. 1 Commissioner: Phil Johnson District No. 2 Commissioner: David W. Sullivan District No. 3 Commissioner: John Austin County Administrator: Philip Morley Clerk of the Board: Erin Lundgren MINUTES Week of December 9, 2013 Chairman John Austin called the meeting to order at the appointed time in the presence of Commissioner David Sullivan and Commissioner Phil Johnson. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The following is a summary of comments made by citizens in attendance at the meeting and reflect their personal opinions: • A citizen reflected on Nelson Mandela's passing and requested a moment of silence; • A citizen suggested postponing the budget vote until a community meeting could be held regarding the Port Townsend Recreation Center and requested a levy lid lift; • A citizen stated: 1) He would like to see the Commissioners' vision for the County's Parks and Recreation programs; 2) Shutting down the Port Townsend Recreation Center when keeping the Senior Center open doesn't seem right; 3) The levy lid should be lifted; and 3) The Metropolitan Park District (MPD) work should continue; • A citizen stated the flags in the Commissioners' Chambers were displayed incorrectly • A citizen stated: 1) Steve Hamm is near death; 2) Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison; 3) When he grew up, there were a lot more heroes than now; 4) The cold spell is a crisis for some County residents; 5) The County should focus on how to create wealth, not how to spend it; and 6) The only way to secure pensions is to have a good economic base; • A citizen stated that during the MPD process, a majority of the citizens did not understand the complexity and urgency of the Parks and Recreation situation at the time; and • A citizen suggested that citizens who are interested in economic development should attend the Port of Port Townsend meetings. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Sullivan moved to approve all the items on the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. 1. CALL FOR BIDS re: Center Road Overlay Phase 6; M.P. 4.39 to 6.86, County Project No. CR1928, Federal Aid Project No. STPR- Q161(009); Bids will be Accepted Until 9:30 a.m. on Monday, January 6, 2014 and Opened and Read Publicly at 10:00 a.m. or shortly thereafter in the Commissioner's Chambers, Jefferson County Courthouse 2. AGREEMENT, Change Order No. 2 re: Alder Creek Tributary Culvert Replacement, Upper Hoh Road M.P. 2.15, Federal Aid Project No. ER- 0801(025), County Project No. X01781; Additional Amount of $4,827.63 for a Total of $512,642.71; Jefferson County Public Works; Seton Construction Page 1 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 3. AGREEMENT NO. LA7393, Supplement No. 4 re: Queets Bridge Painting, Clearwater Road M.P. 0.06 to M.P. 0.76, Project No. CR1881; Re- Distribute Existing Funds, Total Amount of $2,969,652 Remains Unchanged; Jefferson County Public Works; Washington State Department of Transportation 4. AGREEMENT re: Detention Facilities; In the Amount of $100 cost - per -bed; Jefferson County Juvenile Services; Kitsap County 5. AGREEMENT NO. E14 -108 re: Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG); In the Amount of $16,101; Jefferson County Emergency Management; Washington State Military Department, Emergency Management Division 6. AGREEMENT re: Telephone and Internet Services for the Washington State University (WSU) Jefferson County Extension Office; In the Amount of $240 Non - recurring Charge and $790 /month Plus Tax; Washington State University (WSU) Jefferson County Extension Office; Jamestown Networks 7. AGREEMENT re: Associate Development Organization Services; In the Amount of $12,500 in 2013, $25,000 in 2014, $12,500 in 2015; Jefferson County Administrator; Economic Development Council (EDC) Team Jefferson COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING SESSION: The Commissioners each provided updates on the following items: Chairman Austin - Attended State Board of Health meetings last week. Commissioner Johnson - Will be attending a Hood Canal Coordinating Council meeting and Olympic Region Clean Air Agency meeting this week. Commissioner Sullivan - Attended a flag presentation in Superior Court last week. - Will be attending an OlyCAP budget meeting this week. - Will be attending a Peninsula Development District (PDD) meeting and a Resource Conservation and Development (RC &D) meeting this week. There will be discussion on possibly consolidating the two organizations. - Reported that the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (PRTPO) started a community outreach program for its regional transportation plan. The meeting was recessed at 9:55 a.m. and reconvened at 10:05 a.m. with all three Commissioners present. Page 2 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Bid Opening re: Supply of Liquid Asphalt Products for Bituminous Surface Treatment (BST) for Calendar Year 2014 and Supply of Aggregate for the 2014 and 2015 Roadway BST Programs: Public Works staff was present to conduct two bid openings: One for a single year supply of Chipseal BST Oil, and one for a two -year supply of Chipseal BST Aggregate. These products are used together for the BST Program, or chipseal surfacing on all County roads that are not either graveled or paved with asphalt. The BST -Oil bids are for two types of material. One is for a base coat oil called CRS -2P, for use when aggregate (chip rock) is applied to the road surface. The other oil is a solution that is a 50% diluted version of the base coat oil called CSS -1 (50% dilute), which is used as a top coat for sealing the road surface. BID OPENING re: Supply of Liquid Asphalt Products for BST for Calendar Year 2014. Engineer Dale Seward opened and read aloud the three bids that were received. The engineer's estimate is $439,500 for a one year supply. BIDDER BID AMOUNT McAsphalt Industries $645 per ton for 500 tons of CRS -2P; $322,500 $90 per ton for product transport; $45,000 CRS -2P bid total of $367,500 BIDDER BID AMOUNT Paramount Petroleum $560 per ton for 500 tons of CRS -2P; $280,000 $75 per ton for product transport; $37,500 CRS -2P bid total of $317,500 BIDDER BID AMOUNT Albina Asphalt $550 per ton for 500 tons of CRS -2P; $275,000 $76 per ton for product transport; $38,000 CRS -2P bid total of $313,000 $275 per ton for 200 tons of CSS -1 (50% dilute); $55,000 $76 per ton for product transport; $15,200 CSS -1 bid total of $70,200 Entire Albina Bid total of $383,200 BID OPENING re: Supply of Aggregate for the 2014 and 2015 Roadway BST Programs. Engineer Dale Seward opened and read aloud the one bid that was received. The engineer's estimate for aggregate was $54,900 per year; $109,800 for a two year supply. BIDDER BID AMOUNT Pyramid Materials $16.50 per ton for 3,000 tons $49,500 per year, and $99,000 for a two year supply Staff will review the bids and submit a recommendation for bid award to the Board at a future date. Page 3 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Update re: Washington State Department of Natural Resources 3rd Quarter County Income Reports: Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) State Lands Assistant Drew Rosanbalm and Regional Manager Sue Trettevik were present to review the 3`a Quarter County Income report. Ms. Trettevik handed out a packet during the meeting which consisted of a letter from the Commissioner of Public Lands Peter Goldmark, County Income Reports, Timber Sale Distribution Spreadsheets and supportive documents. She noted that Mr. Rosanbalm discovered that the figures for the first three quarters of calendar year 2013 as listed on Commissioner Goldmark's letter may be incorrect. She believes the final figures for 2013 may be higher and that staff is looking into it. Mr. Rosanbalm gave an update on timber sales and the status of timber projects within Jefferson County. He stated that Coyle is cutting faster than anticipated. They are road building and have started harvesting. The County should have income quicker because of this. In Center 12, payments are small right now because it is a thinning, but they have been steady with their payments. Penny Waterline is scheduled to start in February 2014, but has not been appraised yet. He also commented that they have been getting fairly good prices and that timber markets have been steadying and they are holding. Interrorem is set for fiscal year 2014 and sells in April of that year. He noted that the Duckabush was a tougher area to log and it will be a tough sale. Overall, buyers have been aggressive and DNR is getting a lot of bids for everything offered throughout the year. Chairman Austin asked when there is an area where there is more than one taxing district, does that get divided up? Mr. Rosanbalm explained that they look at the total acreage of the sale, they put it on the map and then overlay with the junior taxing district numbers. They then send the information to the Assessor's Office to make sure they have the right taxing district. County Administrator Philip Morley addressed members of the audience to clarify how funds from DNR are distributed. He stated that for example, revenue from timber sales gets distributed like property tax to the relative junior taxing districts where those parcels are located. He noted that the money is not sent just to the County government, it is divided out by the Treasurer to school, hospital and fire districts as well. Commissioner Johnson asked what happens when a contractor builds a new road and they do their logging, are they required to decommission the previous road? Mr. Rosanbalm stated he is unsure, but believes that it would be part of the contract to take care of the roads and specifically mentioned the Dowans Creek area where some culverts may need to be taken out and the ditch area around them may need to be controlled. Mr. Rosanbalm stated that Ms. Trettevik just got approval to hire a planning forester, which was something they have really worked hard to achieve. The new planning forester will be doing the planning and advanced recon, allowing for quicker sales. Ms. Trettevik stated that they are focusing on the quality of pre -sale, where a lot of work can be done in advance. Page 4 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Adoption of the 2014 Jefferson County Budget: County Administrator Philip Morley and Budget Consultant Anne Sears reviewed the resolutions before the Board and some of the changes that were made since the last Commissioner meeting. Consultant Sears reviewed the 5 resolutions before the Board which are as follows: 1. Resolution to adopt the 2014 Jefferson County Budget, including a Final 2014 General Fund Summary, Final 2014 Other Funds Summary and 2014 Staffing Schedule 2. Resolution to adopt 2014 salaries for certain Elected Officials 3. Resolution to adopt the 2014 salary for the elected Prosecuting Attorney 4. Resolution to adopt a 2014 wage matrix for exempt non -union employees 5. Resolution Updating the Working Capital Reserve Recommendations for Each County Fund. A "Summary of Changes to the November 20, 2013 Recommended Budget' which outlines minor changes contained in the Final Budget was provided for the Board to review. Budget Consultant Sears commented that the first resolution adopts the overall budget and includes the summary totals of all funds and staffing schedule. County Administrator Morley and Budget Consultant Sears gave a power point presentation on the 2014 Budget. Chairman Austin asked of the Hotel /Motel Fund has always been at 25 %? County Administrator Morley replied yes, but that in actuality there is more money in the fund which is allocated for capital improvements to the Gateway Visitor Center. Budget Consultant Sears mentioned that the biggest change to the fund balance was made to the Risk Management fund. This was due to a change in the deductible amount and the recommendation from the Washington Counties Risk Pool to provide a minimum fund balance of $216,000. County Administrator Morley pointed out that funds 503, 504, 505 are being combined and collapsed into fund 505 with the accumulative minimum fund balance at 10% or $125,000, whichever is higher. Starting in 2014, fund 505 will pay out for retirement costs and cash -out costs above a certain amount to provide relief to Public Health and other departments. When an employee retires, they cash -out unspent vacation and 25% of their sick leave balance. For a long -time employee who hasn't used all of their vacation or sick days, that can add up to a lot. In the past, this has been paid out of departmental budgets. With the proposed change, it would come out of fund 505 expenses L & 1, LEOFF I retirees and unemployment are also paid out of fund 505. There are a few funds will be eliminated; Animal Services Fund 129 and Federal Forest Title 3 Fund 147. These are older funds that have been spent down or transferred into other places. Budget Consultant Sears clarified that Title 3 is still receiving some funding through the Sheriffs Office for Search and Rescue. The Economic Development Fund 114 will also be closed. It will be absorbed into the General Fund under Non - Departmental County Administrator Morley noted the changes made to the first proposed resolution for the 2014 Budget for the General Fund and Other Funds, and the 2014 Jefferson County Road Construction Program and 2014 Capital Improvement Program. Under `BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED" at the end of the first page, the standard change is to note the following: "that the 2014 Final Budget Detail as posted Page 5 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 by the Jefferson County Auditor on December 91h is hereby accepted. He explained that this was a line item budget and the Commissioners are ultimately adopting a bottom line budget, but they are accepting the line item budget so that the departments can use that as a reference point. Under the last `BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED" of the same Resolution, the paragraph would read: "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following attached budget and staffing schedule (Exhibits I, 1I and 11I) are hereby adopted as the 2014 BUDGET for Jefferson County, including the General Fund and all other County Funds; with BUDGETS being adopted at the DEPARTMENT LEVEL for the General Fund and at the FUND LEVEL for all other funds, with the exception that any revisions that would move funds into salary or benefit line items from non - salary or non - benefit line items, or revisions that effect the number of authorized employee positions, salary, hours, or other conditions of employment must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners." In 2014 UFCW staff members are getting a 1.25% general wage adjustment. Minus the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) this wage increase of 1.25% has been reflected in the salaries for the independent elected officials and exempt staff. A 1.25% wage adjustment was added to the County's share of the Prosecutor's salary. Earlier in the year the BOCC passed a Resolution that acknowledged and memorialized the State's increase to its share of the Prosecutor's Salary. Commissioner Sullivan stated that at a past meeting, there was discussion in regard to having all the elected officials at the same point of equality, which included the County Commissioners. During that discussion, he mentioned that the consensus was it did not feel right to the Commissioners to ask for a salary increase during the recession. In the time since the meeting, Commissioner Sullivan thought that it may have been better for the future to gradually increase those salaries and then donating some of the salary back like they had done before. He noted that the District 3 position alternates with Districts 1 and 2 and it has always been out of sync in terms of salaries over the years without a good way to address it. County Administrator Morley replied that there were two ways to adjust salaries for elected bodies. They can take action and set salaries for the County Commissioners, but it would not take effect until the next election. The reasoning behind that is so Commissioners cannot vote for a salary increase for themselves. The new salary would then be set for the next four years. The other option would be for a Salary Review Commission to look into it. They have the ability to do the annual indexing and the terms are staggered two years apart. He added that nothing can be done this fall that would affect salaries in 2014. The Commissioners agreed to look into this topic at the beginning of 2014. Commissioner Sullivan added that he was more concerned about the future and County Administrator Morley agreed that it was a balance to model financial constraint but also adequately fund and maintain a salary that would be appealing to those that may already have careers. Commissioner Johnson explained that by approving the budget as presented, there would be some citizens who may think that the Commissioners may have already made up their minds regarding the parks and recreation future. He stated that is not true and there is much more that would need to happen. Commissioner Sullivan moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 6161 =13 adopting the 2014 Budget for the General Fund and Other Funds, and the 2014 Jefferson County Road Construction Program and 2014 County Capital Improvement Program. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Page 6 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Commissioner Johnson moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 6262 =13 Establishing New Salaries for the Elected Officials of Jefferson County. Commissioner Sullivan seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Sullivan moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 63-13 Establishing the Prosecuting Attorney's Salary for 2014. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 6464 =13 adopting a Salary Schedule for the FLSA and Union Exempt Management and Professional Employees for 2014. Commissioner Sullivan seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Sullivan moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 65-13 Updating the Working Capital Reserve Recommendations for Each County Fund. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. County Administrator Morley noted that one of the changes in the proposed resolution was the term "Recommendations." They wanted to clarify that these are goals that each of the funds should manage towards but that it is not a sacrosanct fund reserve. Over the course of the year, for cash flow purposes, a fund can certainly dip into that. Chairman Austin called for a vote on the motion. The motion carried by a unanimous vote. The meeting was recessed at 11:13 a.m. and reconvened at 1:36 p.m. with all three Commissioners present. Briefing re: Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan: Emergency Management Director Bob Hamlin gave a presentation on the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. He stated the plan must be reviewed every four years. The last time the plan was reviewed was in 2009. He noted that the previous plan was not a very good working model. The revised plan is narrative -based and is more readable according to Director Hamlin. The plan also includes accommodations for persons with disabilities. Prior to Hurricane Katrina, this was not a concern. They are now required to incorporate and integrate persons with disabilities into their planning process. An important part of the plan is to collaborate with the City, first responders and non - profit organizations. Director Hamlin stated that this is a joint plan with the City and that the City Council adopted the joint plan in October 2013. In exchange for planning and coordination, the City is providing staffing assistance and have assigned personnel to assist Emergency Management. The plan also defines how they do business and how the community will perform emergency management functions. The recovery portion of the Comprehensive Emergency Plan deals with the aftermath of an emergency in much greater detail than the previous version of the plan. Director Hamlin stated that is where the high costs are found. Page 7 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Commissioner Sullivan stated the new version of the plan is easy to read. Director Hamlin added that the plan meets all the requirements of the law. The plan was reviewed by the State of Washington and met all of their criteria for a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. A r to adopt the revised Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan will be submitted for approval by the Board of County Commissioners in January 2014. Director Hamlin noted that Emergency Management text alerts are gaining popularity and currently there are over 1,000 people signed up for alerts with the anticipation of an additional 1,000 by next year. The meeting was recessed at 1:50 p.m. and reconvened at 1:56 p.m. with all three Commissioners present. Update re: Climate Action Committee (CAC): CAC Chair Cindy Jayne and Vice Chair Brian Goldstein gave a presentation on the CAC progress report. Also present was the Department of Community Development (DCD) Director Carl Smith and Planning Manager Stacie Hoskins. CAC Chair Jayne reviewed the mission statement of the CAC which states: "Help the community reach the locally adopted goal to achieve a community -wide standard of cutting green house gas emissions to levels 80% lower than 1990 levels by the year 2050." A power point presentation depicted the adopted work plan, update on CAC's progress, Green House Gas (GHG) emissions update and challenges and recommendations. Vice Chair Goldstein noted that the CAC is set to expire by 2014. Only 4 more meetings are scheduled.. Commissioner Johnson explained the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) air monitoring process and suggested that the CAC get in contact with them in regard to biomass. It was recommended by CAC staff to extend CAC beyond 2014 and increase meeting frequency to monthly or bi- monthly and dedicate staff time toward meeting the goals of the CAC. County Administrator Morley stated that staffing for CAC has been done primarily by the Department of Community Development (DCD). He added that DCD's budget remains constrained and Director Smith agreed. There are concerns over possible loss of EPA grant funding at the end of this year which would make it unlikely that DCD could participate. Director Smith mentioned that they try to balance all programs such as affordable housing and economic development. Vice Chair Goldstein asked if grant funding was the only way the DCD could participate? Director Smith replied that even with a grant, it would depend on the duration. It takes time to manage, do the recording, provide project management and track and monitor. If there was grant money, it would be helpful and they could hire a consultant to do a lot of the work. Director Smith stated that he and Planning Manager Hoskins had hoped that they could take the work that has already been done by the CAC, and work with the Planning Commission and the community to incorporate that into the Comprehensive Plan update process without a lot of legwork from DCD. Commissioner Sullivan added that if it was a state or national priority, the funding will come from that direction. Page 8 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Discussion re: Enhancing Local Options for the Utilization of Conservation Futures: Environmental Health Specialist Tami Pokorny briefed the board on information received from Matthew Randazzo who is the Senior Advisor to the Commissioner of Public Lands. She handed out a document titled "Enhancing Local Options for the Utilization of Conservation Futures" written by Senior Advisor Randazzo which depicts the issues that Conservation Futures is facing in some counties. Below is an excerpt from that document: "Thirteen Washington counties participate in the Conservation Futures Program, a countywide property tax levy that generates revenue to protect working forests and farms, outdoor recreational areas, and open space. However, in some counties, applying a Conservation Futures Tax countywide has not been viable due to the variable distribution of population, income, lands targeted for preservation, and support for land retention funding. In other counties, successful and popular Conservation Futures Programs have been enacted countywide without sating the appetite for local conservation funding." Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is proposing a bill to allow greater flexibility for county "districts" or cities and towns to create Conservation Futures programs. Environmental Health Specialist Pokorny noted that the maximum total allowable Conservation Futures levy rate is 0.0625 cents per thousand and that the current Jefferson County Conservation Futures levy rate is 0.04572, which would leave 0.01678 before maximum was met. She handed out summary paperwork titled "Draft Bill; Flexible Conservation Futures" and referred to it during the discussion with the Board. Flexible Conservation Futures Taxing District(s) were discussed by Environmental Health Specialist Pokomy who stated that the maximum levy would still be at 0.0625. The Districts would be flexible taxing districts within the County. They would be in lieu of imposing a County -wide levy. To create a district, Jefferson County would first need to repeal the existing levy. She added that there can be more than one district, but that they must not overlap. To create a Flexible Conservation Futures taxing district, there needs to be a resolution of intention, public hearing and adoption of a resolution creating a district or municipal program. Revenue must be held in a special fund for the district. Spending for the district would only be by authority of the County Commissioners and acquisitions must be within the district. The process of a Municipal Conservation Futures Program is similar to the Flexible Conservation Futures process with the exception that adoption of a resolution creating a municipal program would be consistent with Section 12 with respect to RCW 84.34.230 and that acquisitions may occur within the City or the County. Environmental Health Specialist Pokorny listed the Pro's and Con's of such Flexible Conservation Futures Programs: Pro's If the current County levy is to remain where it is, a Municipal Conservation Futures Program for the City of Port Townsend would increase the rate of lands retention The Conservation Futures levy would be paid for by those who are most in favor of it (district or municipal) Page 9 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Ell Municipal programs would increase protection of open space in urban areas where this is a priority Con's • If the City of Port Townsend levied up to the maximum amount, there would be no option to increase the Conservation Futures levy for Jefferson County without first repealing the County program and creating a district to replace it • Impacts to project sponsors who may need to coordinate their projects across two or more Conservation Futures programs • Potential confusion within the community caused by differences between programs and appearance of redundancy • Unknowns regarding if programs could, or would, collaborate • Decreased efficiencies where multiple districts or programs exist as compared to single County- wide program • May stimulate dissatisfaction with existing County -wide Conservation Futures program boundary. Environmental Health Specialist Pokorny reviewed the legislative bill titled "Enhancing Local Options for the Utilization of Conservation Futures ". She stated it is a draft and she had several discrepancies. In her summary, she suggested considering raising of the existing Jefferson County Conservation Futures levy to the full amount at 0.0625 cents per thousand to negate the need for a municipal district, maintain current efficiencies and continue productive partnership with the City for preservation of the Quimper Wildlife Corridor and other key open spaces. There was no action taken by the Board. The meeting was recessed at 3:11 p.m. and reconvened at 3:16 p.m. with all three Commissioners present. COUNTYADMINISTR,4 TOR BRIEFING SESSION: County Administrator Philip Morley reviewed the following with the Board. Calendar Coordination • Commissioner Johnson will be attending an Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) meeting on December 11, 2013 • All three Commissioners will be attending a Hood Canal Coordinating Council (HCCC) meeting in Mason County on December 11, 2013 • Chairman Austin will be attending a JeffCom meeting on December 19, 2013 • The BOCC meeting for December 23, 2013 has been cancelled • There will be an HCCC meeting on January 15, 2014 • County Administrator Philip Morley will be attending a JeffCom meeting on January 23, 2014 • Chairman Austin will be attending a National Association of County Officials (NACo) Conference in March, 2014 Page 10 Commissioners Meeting Minutes of December 9, 2013 Miscellaneous Issues: • Shoreline Master Program (SMP) status • Fire Official Interlocal Agreement (ILA) • Lean Training • Jefferson Associated Council (JAC) contract status update • Humane Society contract status update • JeffCom: Coyle & License agreement status update • Parks and City bonding request • 4`h Quarter budget appropriations January 9, 2014 meeting of Economic Development Council (EDC) to craft 5 agreements on economic development priorities • 2014 Committee Assignments for next meeting Future Agenda Items: Commissioner Committee Assignments NOTICE OFADJOURNMENT. Commissioner Sullivan moved to adjourn the meeting at 4:30 p.m. until the next regular meeting or special meeting as properly noticed. Commissioner Johnson seconded4hg motion which carried by a unanimous vote. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SEAL: JAvtn, it ATTEST: Carolyn A ery Deputy Clerk of the Board Page 11