Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2012-00033
UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#MLA12-00274 Review Type Project Description ZON12-00033 I COMP PLAN AMENDMENT Primary: GARY MC LUEN Site Address: MARIA BOTET MC LUEN 4932 SR 20 2023 E SIMS WAY# 123 PORT TOWNSEND WA, 98368 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-6905 REP BILL MARLOW PO BOX 618 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 Project Location: Parcel number 901 054 003,Lot 4, in Section 05,Township 29,Range 01 West,WM, located at 4934 SR 20, Port Townsend,WA 98368 Parcel Number: 901054003 S-T-R: 5-29N-01W Total Acreage 58 Legal Description S5 T29 R1W TAX 37 BND TGTH THRU BLA#108277 Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: •chool D 50 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES NO Stream Type:YES NO Fish& Wildlife:YES NO Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NO Seismic: YES NO Landslide: YES NO Flood: YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other I 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): - Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 901054003 1.) 6yr Mor.on FPA2611456 application approved on 10/19/11. 10/20/11 Non-Forest Permits Moratorium expires 10/19/17.JCC18.20.160(5)(b) "Mandatory six year development moratorium. For six years after the date of the application the county shall deny any and all applications for permits and approvals, including building permits and subdivision approvals, relating to or for non forestry uses of land subject to the application. Associated CASES status issued finaled description 901054003 COM03-00026 F 5/29/2003 WENT TO ARCHIVES 2/3/06 Small out buildings without proper permits FPA2608103 F 11/9/2006 11/15/2006 10 acre timber harvest FPA2611026 C 20-acre timber harvest FPA2611456 F 10/19/2011 10/20/2011 20-acre timber harvest. MLA01-00429 BLD01-00455 F 9/6/2001 4/23/2002 (ADU)SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W/ATTACHED SHOP MLA03-00227 BLD03-00269 EXP 6/4/2003 MAIN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE MLA04-00473 SUB04-00031 F 12/10/2004 1/20/2005 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT MLA12-00274 ZON12-00033 P COMP PLAN AMENDMENT PRE02-00016 F 2/28/2002 Single Family Residence with attached garage(1-story) SOM00-00265 F CAR00-00527 F 3/8/2001 3/8/2001 septic system for single family residence USR02-00010 F 2/27/2002 well abandonment in area of permitted drainfield PRJ00-00279 P SEP00-00265 F 3/15/2001 4/10/2002 USR00-00094 F 8/13/2001 8/13/2001 CASE SUMMARY FOR ZON12-00033 Printed June 11, 2014 Applicant: GARY MC LUEN Status: F MARIA BOTET MC LUEN 2023 E SIMS WAY# 123 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-6905 Project Description: COMP PLAN AMENDMENT Per Ord 02-1104-13, MLA12-274 [Gary McLuen; William Marlow, agent], located at mile post 5 of SR 20 on the east side of SR 20, approximately 1.5 miles south of the Four Corners Rd/Discovery Rd/SR 210 intersection, approximately 37 acres identified as APN 901-054-003 shall be given in its entirety an underlying land use designation of Rural Residential 1:10 (RR1:10)depicted on the corresponding map in "Attachment A". Parcel Number: 901054003 S-T-R: 5-29N-01W Site 4932 SR 20 Address: PORT TOWNSEND WA, 98368 ACTIVITIES: Description Activity Notes Sianed Off Case Entered 12/20/2012 App Substantially Complete-U 3/1/2013 Env. Sensitive Area Review-U 9/4/2013 Consistency Review-U 9/4/2013 DCD Review Time 9/10/2013 Approve Permit-UF Per Ord 02-1104-13, MLA12-274 [Gary McLuen; William Marlow, 11/4/2013 agent], located at mile post 5 of SR 20 on the east side of SR 20, approximately 1.5 miles south of the Four Corners Rd/Discovery Rd/SR 210 intersection, approximately 37 acres identified as APN 901-054-003 shall be given in its entirety an underlying land use designation of Rural Residential 1:10 (RR1:10)depicted on the corresponding map in "Attachment A". Override- Parcel Holds 11/14/2013 Close Case: Project Complete No appeals received. 1/6/2014 SLH 1/6/2014 CONDITIONS: No conditions found for this case. CASE NOTES: No notes found for this case. PARCEL TAGS: Title Notes Updated 1.) 6yr Mor. on FPA2611456 application approved on 10/19/11. Moratorium expires 10/20/11 Non-Forest Permits 10/19/17. JCC18.20.160(5)(b)"Mandatory six year development moratorium. For six years after the date of the application the county shall deny any and all applications for permits and approvals, including building permits and subdivision approvals, relating to or for non forestry uses of land subject to the application. ASSOCIATED CASES: .Cases in Project# Cases for Parcel#901054003 Cases with Master# MLA12-00274 and Review Type ZON12-00033 BLD01-00455 ZON12-00033 ZON12-00033 BLD03-00269 CAR00-00527 COM03-00026 FPA2608103 FPA2611026 FPA2611456 PRE02-00016 PRJ00-00279 SEP00-00265 SOM00-00265 SUB04-00031 USR00-00094 USR02-00010 ZON 12-00033 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_Case_Summary.rpt June 11,2014 Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 10/1/2012 to 10/30/2013 for ZON12-00033. (Hourly Rate = $76.00) ZON12-00033 MC LUEN 09/26/2013 60 Review 2013-09-24 Coordinated PC signature, prepped docs SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/03/2013 15 Review 2013-10-03 email and call representative regarding BOCC Stacie Hoskins consideration Monday 10/7. SLH 10/30/2013 45 Review 2013-10-07 2013 CPA recommendation to BOCC SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/30/2013 60 Review 2013-10-28 Finish adopting ordinance and route to CH SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/30/2013 45 Review 2013-10-25 2013 CPA-Agenda Request SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/30/2013 75 Review 2013-10-23 Draft adopting ordinance and agenda request SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/30/2013 30 Review 2013-10-21 Draft 2013 CPA ordinance SLH Stacie Hoskins 10/30/2013 45 Review 2013-10-18 Prep 2013 CPA ordinance SLH Stacie Hoskins 375 minutes (6.25 hours) $475.00 Total 375 minutes (6.25 hours) $475.00 1 10/30/201: \\tidemark\data\forms\r_DCD. Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Wednesday,August 28, 2013 8:17 AM To: bmarlow @olympus.net Subject: RE: McLuen Comp Plan Amendment question Thanks, Bill! I'll include your explanation in the staff report.-Stacie From: bmarlowOolympus.net [mailto:bmarlow@olvmpus.net] Sent:Tuesday, August 27, 2013 6:18 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: Re: McLuen Comp Plan Amendment question Hi Stacie, I hope that your doing well...I am still in Oze but will be home next week...It will of course take a few days to get back mentally...But I would be happy to explain... It is quite simple actually at the time the FPA was filed the Mcluens had no intention of sub-division...It was about a year later...Mr. Mcluens health situation had been declining and they wanting an ability at some point in the future to be able to sell parts of the 60 acres that they own in case of emergency financial issues...So they started talking about how they may move forward...We are aware that the subdivision could not take place until the moratorium has been lifted...In spite of that fact and time line the Mcluens felt that they would be right to spend the investment now in preparation for the end of the moratorium and eventual subdivision...And, like you, I didn't see where it would preclude a CPA anywhere in the rules so we moved forward... Thanks I hope this sheds a little light on our motives and end goals... Cheers, Bill :) On 28.08.2013 02:20, Stacie Hoskins wrote: Hi,Bill, I hope you're able to receive email while you're away. If not,perhaps you'll be prepared for the public hearing on September 18th. I'm writing the staff report for the 2013 CPAs and wanted to give you a chance to respond to the moratorium. Our records show a Forest Practices permit FPA2611456 was approved on October 19, 2011, and the application stated there was not an intent to convert. 1 FPA2611456 application approved on 10/19/11. Moratorium expires 10/19/17. JCC18.20.160(5)(b) "Mandatory six year development moratorium. For six years after the date of the application the county shall deny any and all applications for permits and approvals, including building permits and subdivision approvals, relating to or for non forestry uses of land subject to the application. While I agree that the CPA is not a land use approval and can be done during the moratorium, the Planning Commission and BOCC will likely want an answer to this. As such, I wanted to give you an option ahead of time to say something that I can include in the staff report. I need to finish the staff report Friday,August 30th for our public hearing on Wed, Sept 18th. Thanks so much, Bill! ,Stexie l'. Madei ra Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins(co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `'SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 5:01 PM To: reviewteam @commerce.wa.gov Cc: Carl Smith; Michelle McConnell Subject: 60-Day Notice Attachments: GMS-Plan-Dev-Reg-Review-Commerce-Notice-60-Day.doc; 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_1-4.pdf; 201 3 CPA_Staff Rpt_Appendices_A.pdf; 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_Appendices_B-D.pdf Hello review team:Attached is a 60-day notice for a proposed amendment to our Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Please confirm receipt and contact me with any questions. Thank you, Stacie 4. q044¢414 Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins@ co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW i►rA SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 8:31 AM To: Bill; seahorse @olympus.net Cc: Planning Commission Desk Subject: 2013 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Amendments Attachments: 2013_CPA Staff_Rpt_1-4.pdf; 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_Appendices_A.pdf; 2013 _C PA_Staff_Rpt_Ap pend i ces_B-D.pdf Hello, Doug& Bill, The public hearing before the Planning Commission for your Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications will be on Wednesday,September 18 at 6:30 pm at the Tri-Area Community Center. Attached is my staff report recommending approval of both of your proposals. Additional materials for the two proposals and public hearings are online for review here under'Documents'. You will be allotted 3-5 minutes to speak at the hearing and may submit any written comments prior to or at the hearing. The Planning Commission may also ask you specific questions when they deliberate. We also have another hearing on a UDC Text amendment that evening. Given we'd like to have both hearings and deliberate on all proposals that evening, please be prepared to stay the full meeting. I look forward to seeing you at the hearing. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything. Best regards, Staeie 4. rgo&¢im Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinspco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday,September 09, 2013 4:47 PM To: Douglas G. Mason,Attorney at Law; Bill Subject: FW: PC: agenda&materials for 9/18 meeting next week(6:30pm @ Tri Area Comm Ctr) Attachments: 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_1-4.pdf.pdf; 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_Appendices_A.pdf.pdf; 2013 _CPA_Staff_Rpt_Appendices_B-D.pdf.pdf; PC memo for 9-18-13-amendment of JCC 18.40.090(9-3-13).pdf.pdf; PC Recommendation findings JCC 18.40.090 Preapplication fees (8-27-13).pdf.pdf; DCD Fees-PC memo for 9-18-13(9-3-13).pdf.pdf; PC Agenda 9-18-2013.pdf Doug& Bill, Please see attached and below for the Planning Commission meeting on Sept 18th. Call or email me if you have any questions. Thanks! Stelae L'. qodead Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinsta?co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission; To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Planning Commission Desk Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 4:42 PM To: Planning Commission Desk Subject: PC: agenda&materials for 9/18 meeting next week(6:30pm @ Tri Area Comm Ctr) Hello Planning Commissioners and interested parties; Agenda & Materials In preparation for the September 18 regular meeting with two public hearings next week, please review the following materials: • September 18 Meeting Agenda (also attached) 2013 Comp Plan Amendments • Staff Report(also attached) • Appendices A.1 —A.5 (also attached) • Appendices B— D (also attached) UDC Text Amendment— Pre-Application Conference • Memo— MLA13-115 (also attached) • Staff Recommendation (also attached) 1 • Memo - Fees (also attached) Meeting Time & Location PLEA_ N TE Meeting be heid at6 30 pm at e T Community Ce 0 , " ithimacum), the Planning Commission encourages public attendance and rescheduled the meeting to occur after 5pm to allow greater participation. Member Attendance As a courtesy and to avoid an unexcused absence, please inform your Chair, Vice Chair and staff ASAP or no later than 11:00 am next Wednesday if you will not attend next week's meeting. Thanks, Michelle Interim PC Secretary <> <> <> <> <> <> Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 360.379.4450 http://www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PlanningCommission.htm <> <> <> <> <> <> NOTE: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Messages may be viewed by parties other than the intended recipient. SAVE PAPER-Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary! 2 *.SON ISif NCIAu JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 Planning Commission Recommendation for 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Docket Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments Recommendation with Findings and Conclusions To: Board of County Commissioners, Chair John Austin; Department of Community Development, Director Carl Smith; and Interested public of Jefferson County Date: September 18, 2013 Attached: MLA12-00274 (McLuen) -Map of Proposed map Redesignation/Rezone MLA13-00045 (Boulton) -Map of Proposed map Redesignation/Rezone In preparing our recommendation,we have considered the staff report,the growth management indicators and other general guidance on required findings, and therefore do hereby declare the following findings and conclusions in support of our decision: A. Required findings as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.080(1)(b)(i-iii): JCC 18.45.080 Final docket—Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners review. (1)Planning Commission Review.All proposed amendments on the final docket shall be reviewed and assessed by the planning commission,which shall make a recommendation to the board of county commissioners after holding at least one open record public hearing. (a)Notice.The hearing before the planning commission shall be noticed by one publication in the official newspaper of the county at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of the notice of hearing in the Jefferson County Courthouse. This notice shall include the following: • (i)The purpose(s)of amending and/or updating the Comprehensive Plan; (ii)The deadline for submitting comments on the amendments; and (iii)A tentative hearing schedule;continued hearings may be held by the planning commission but no additional notices need be published. (b) Required Findings—Generally. For all proposed amendments,the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators set forth in JCC 18.45.050(4)(b)(i)through(4)(b)(vii), as well as the following: (i)Whether circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located have substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (ii)Whether the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are no longer valid, or whether new information is available which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan;and (iii)Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County. Planning Commission findings: I. Circumstances have changed in the sense the economy in recent years has suffered through the"great recession", meaning less land development in the County and therefore slower growth than anticipated. II. The assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are still valid. The map changes proposed are consistent with the designation criteria in the Comprehensive Plan. III. The proposed amendments are consistent with widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County given they are consistent with the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Only the map is changing for these amendments. C. Inquiry to the growth management indicators as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.080(4Xcxi-vili): 1. The proposals meet concurrency requirements for transportation. The proposed amendments should not adversely impact the level of county services. 2. There are no inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan. These amendments are for mapping changes that are consistent with the text of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendments will not result in a probable significant adverse impact to the transportation network,capital facilities, utilities, parks,or environmental features. 4. The proposal is physically suitable for the requested land use designations. Both are similar to the surrounding properties and their access to utilities and land uses. 5. The proposals are unlikely to create pressure to change the land use designation of other properties. 6. The site-specific proposals do not affect the land use and population growth projections that are the basis of the comprehensive plan. The proposed land uses will be consistent with surrounding land uses. 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 2 7. The proposed amendments are not located within an area that is currently under review for UGA designation. 8. The proposed amendments meet the requirements of GMA. The character of the rural area will not be affected by redesignating this property. Inquiry to the growth management indicators as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.050(4)(b)(1--vii): 1. Growth and development as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan is occurring slower than anticipated due to economic conditions. 2. The capacity of the county to provide adequate services has diminished due to a decrease in tax revenue. The number of service providers in the County has not decreased and the County, with the exception of policy decisions made as a result of economic conditions, continues to be equipped to provide the same levels of service available at the time of Comprehensive Plan adoption. The County is in the process of implementing provisions for the lrondale/Hadlock Urban Growth Area (UGA) to have urban services, specifically sanitary sewer service and stormwater management. 3. There is sufficient urban land, as designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need. 4. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1998, the majority of assumptions made as part of the Plan continue to be valid. Amendments to GMA and other laws made by the State Legislature and precedent-setting decisions made by the Growth Management Hearings Boards influence local government implementation of GMA. Aerial photography and Lidar data is available today that wasn't available at time of Comprehensive Plan adoption. Such information allows study and analysis context that may provide substantiation for more refined land use designation boundaries. 5. Changes in countywide attitudes have not been revealed that necessitate any sweeping changes to the Plan, nor the basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement. 6. Since Comprehensive Plan adoption in 1998, the County has established an informal policy of considering "pattern of development" using a 50%threshold. Where properties are bordered by properties of a smaller size on 50% of their perimeter, the Planning Commission and Board have agreed such a"pattern of development" of smaller density may be supported. This 50% threshold within the larger context of the residential density designation criteria was not specifically considered during the adoption process or any of the annual amendment cycles for this parcel. 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 3 7. The Comprehensive Plan is consistent with both the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policy. In 2004, Jefferson County, pursuant to the Growth Management Act, conducted a review of the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC to ensure consistency between those documents and the Growth Management Act. The next periodic review is slated for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle in order to be complete by the June 30, 2016 deadline established by the State of Washington. D. The Record In addition to the guidance provided by GMA, the Countywide Planning Policies, the Jefferson County Code, and the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission finds: 1. This proposed amendment is based on findings as required by JCC 18.45.050 and 18.45.080. 2. The public hearing for this proposed amendment has been duly noticed per the requirements of JCC 18.45.080. 3. This proposed amendment has been duly assessed for environmental impacts via a SEPA Checklist, as required by Chapter 197-11 WAC (SEPA rules). 4. This proposed amendment recommendation is based on the record, following an open record hearing and following the close of the open record hearing, consideration by the Planning Commission of any written or oral comments. 5. This proposed amendment satisfies legal criteria. 6. This proposed amendment is being provided for a 60 day review to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services, as required by RCW 36.70A.106 (GMA). 7. Finding for MLA12-00274(McLuen): The County has and will maintain 26,893 acres designated rural residential. RR 1:20 is reduced by less than one-tenth of one percent, and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will, with passage of this amendment, still have the "variety of RR densities"that is required by the GMA. 8. Finding for MLA13-00045 (Boulton): The Boulton farm is historical, continuously productive, and owned by the same landowner as the adjacent forest lands. Given the common ownership, Mr. Boulton has been able to manage the lands jointly. While historically beneficial, the applicant proposes it is not financially viable for a new farmer to purchase both the farm and the large forest land tracts. It is common practice for farmers to live on the land they farm. It is not always typical for foresters to live on the land they manage for timber. This historical benefit should not preclude the future division of the forest land from the home and farm as not separating the farm from the forest lands might cause the end of farming at this farm. Further, the unique nature of this farm, i.e., that forest lands are commonly owned with it, ensures this 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 4 action is not likely to set a precedent for future rezones of portions of forest land adjacent to agriculture. This action matches the Comprehensive Plan to the actual use of the property on the ground and continues natural resource activities on all affected land. A conservation easement is under development to ensure perpetual use of the property in agricultural use. The potential for more low density sprawl will be averted by adoption of this Comprehensive Plan amendment. Based on these findings, on September 18, 2013, the Jefferson County Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Docket and recommend that the BoCC approve the Planning Agency's request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as proposed. Kevin Coker, Planning Commission Chair Date 2013CPA_PC Recommendation fmdings.docx 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 5 A. .x.A.3, ..5-7 pe, © so tv 4:5 4 ,.., .. ..5.... n < 0 is- er . ' '''4 --- -. . ,.........., ..... . --... ... Lit r) '' r - ,.[„,,,,,. , , I :• ...., .,'',.. .. i $ f'D 'el 1 1 i • • , H . • i -....., , 0 = .i• ' ., 1 , I 1 i 1 . ,: -i . ,,t ..! , i I '..0,.•r.Vg.'-!! . ......„. rd.' 1.i. v, p■ — ,.. g -......... ,.,,,,, . cl et g 5. '44.1 I I .ji. . R.. ocj ag Cro -- I a 1--' r:i n ziiii.:•,....:,..:e • -•.....,.. L.............,. 0 °0 0 ....„ -1c.:',,, .' • , :t..:Ivi.e.tx,„1 :,', .,,,, - - - ----_,•,... . i • ,all ET ,...... r ..*Mh0.1cri.;.,',.,' ' ''' `'.■ ■L,'i.'''■:'' Ati:;;::.64;.1 ..„. . .....a, . ' A;00.144,,,,..:-•:3 3.*,..... .-...,-,-,bt '.-i 4 A:ity.•:•::::::,....?...,tei,".F.;•-...:::::.:4:::.:::::..,:e,:•:.,...:: -- 4-‘•,.,. "*"..,....,„; ,, k: -;.'4..•ii444`N:1 ..,i..:::st:.••4.ie.;:v.•,••,...,: •-.., .• ,i, •-.....L.:.,-....Viii,:.!.i.:,:...tp:.÷4■11:4;:: !II• 4: %.'Ilii ' ""' 4. • ` ' •if.,• 4.2•••••%:,...:,,.... •,•••••,* '. ,...„-,„-eik.„. . . • .........:: ,A.;.:it'::e:•'•-:.ri..-....:.-C•On:9•••••,''':' .0' P'lift .0.,...*.,., , ,,, .,,,...; :...,.. .. , • ,;, 74...71...e,pe•;;.:.::.:1....rei:Z••'.•?•••.0 .. ... . ' :41,:::'!'-■,:'''',,. '14.',"14'ni ' , '' ' :Sdkr,.:,•+......s.“;:;,a_':4?4'..'ii:•:4:44.4.i.At'4Ii: .31‘.....-4.7.ku,L..,."- k, e-, : ,'',:,„:1/4";,,, 7.4,.....tmr:r.:F.q...-:•.5";.1.0:9-tslim . • ra - ..r..:-.q.;.. ,:`,1". .7e..?..,„,. .„-,, riz.-- ,. .-,,,s--,,,, . ,,, .0i.,:zf.,,:l.t:tol;r•:_,•J •N44. 1 " '.4:,..‘. •*,;ik.''.::,„,,,."- ' '',1 -.'•--:...,,fc,%-'tlit'k,'• . ' .•:, ,. .. if...A;Vilii:..et.5:-elid..4 . ...-11 NS ii::„,.._,1"•.:•••••.•• . .1,47',."F,, '., '''',.." 't14;•'' ' ,• . • • . P..V.,'..7::.•Ye•::1?::.•■•ii.;,;•..'!''''.:;r4tYis.:;'' . •• htb .". ■•••,:-.....• Vf...' • \,',,, N... ., - .:L ,••, '`:," ..' 0.C.e.;?;4.74.;,'.ii;..1"4::g.f.-.:',":,::: I. - ft' iii:i,Dt..,:_.-....z,.,.,,,,,..:,,...,,'4: -,Z,-,.:4's,•-,„..',?:,: = ,,...,. . ., .41,1?;,:.z.1...:.`,I,.:g 1:-.1 .iir,:,..,z.z, • ,.. il, ' '?..43,••Nti.ti,,,,r`%,,,, ' ;),1--zi■k • •'..r;:`...wis‘- ,:•pgr,:,:.,.1!'4411;tV..51!, 4...1.;:e.1.3.6a....p.,....6:,..:;.!....,...4.,..i:itoti-.....ga..:,..,:c.--s...,.....F,:,-.-:,..,--• .. , , r:,..f. . -m ' Ak,,zu...,,,,i46),1/4. i.••-..: .,.0,t•: ; - .:;;.... .. •paN:..,.N.."Z1 fl.,..,...,:::.....ltici.tv?....,,,.:::?..;,..4'griiiii:ei:;1•4iirii.: A•lt;•17,i:Z.rst.i.4.■6'-',:k r ,-- Itk...517-.... ... ,..'' . , -'-‘,1,.... ,.. . ,. a,,:..2...e.....v14.1v:NA si:::::,......v..::;:!,..:?;.:?:....".:b.:2;iii:n.,..t....!..15.:..v-:,..:•:',.. ,.,.i....•::::k......itg.,;.::;.:::•,;?.; ..:''''A;:iw -;'4.74- r,1•■ 90 . . , . • . , ...... c.....) , .. 0 ‘A '')' • , . X 0 4 4) a. it; 2,•7.1', , .3). ill a 3 - • 2 73 1 g P , , . , •• ' -n a c - • c . • t'-* , ,'-'.. a. ' c , . , , , . • ` - .-„ , x . 4.,,,. ., , - . . . , . , .04 • , . _ ., ‘ • . . . , . • . • . . < - . . . . , , ,. ,. • , , . ..' , „ - . . 7 2.' ' • ‘ . . , , ' .. • ,3 , ,. . ■ s r'' . . . ,i. ....4t% , . .... ,, ■ .. .„ ,..,. ......... A. .x.A.5, ..5-11 40 m ft *0 r r > ° s m ....., , '11 c7, oq "1 1:".. '-'• 5 el go ' = , 4.4. ' t.,. 11:11 •- CA - ri. ‘ , .. ..1: • :--4, * 0 &'I 5 , 5 . . I *-- ••■ ,„ 4 ■ I.- . , 4 ri raill ... i > • ' - 0-k - , I ).1:, . .. t I 5 4 4;„-,. ii... ..,,,,,-..... , 4.4„„At.,141,` . cw• ''' • -"S 4..,,,,,,,4 eig; ' -4,- < 41‘.i.,.i.....'1.. , ...,4 -fr,4141' , .-„„. ,,,,,.... ,....-, h fl.,.<, - .. %AV • ir=m;, -It ..'• ,If'vs it-, , , aj ss4't 6.44:;.4 -.' ...r.,. ' ' '4'"....f. • , •.c...,,f = tea '''','; '1'.7 .c''',"'e.-...• ,$, .'... _ 4 4.,-'c 21 .1 , -1,_ '., •7.11 :',.'• .'"`"4". At i 1.,4 4.l't 4 , •:'t. i' 412 5.1 i 4 g g g ,o,,, "P3 .. 2 r, _Nwle., -t e ‘,‘Zt-'''s MIN.i'mtir • , ' ,.v ,.,„'* „ , . x - -, . . . . 14 a'r ;•-••,E, '14:4; .% L'' ., ;f0 . ‘ ,'9 ' ' , ','-"` -',-*';*•:,' ''',"Plet,:i: 6 ' , 1 , I if T g A I g . , .. , . .- 45, . it tt I _ i 3 W - .............. 1 i 4 a 1 2 a, c, o 8 ,iig . 3-.4 , ,4 .• '' ^‘ 4 cp C CO --'''4""'"t..'d.•.....„.t',' > ' . •c C CA . CO . .•g .,,_ ' . ..- ''.. '''§ , ,. • I-0 2 I > a 1 1 .. Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:21 AM To: Bill; seahorse @olympus.net Subject: 2013 CPAs before Board Mon 10/7 Attachments: 2013-10-7_Final AR re Staff-PC Recommendation Report to BOCC.DOCX;2013-09-18 PC Rec 2013CPA.PDF Hi, Bill&Doug, I will present your Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications to the Board of County Commissioners on Monday, Oct 7th sometime between 10:00 am—noon. Attached are my agenda request and the Planning Commission recommendation. The Board's final agenda will be available online here no later than tomorrow(Friday)mid-day. Please call or email with any questions. .Stacie Z. godeasd Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins(aco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER- Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Stacie Hoskins From: Bill [bmarlow @olympus.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:03 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: 11/4/2013 Consent Agenda Request-2013 CPA ordinance Hey Stacie, Thanks for the communications...And I appreciate all your work...Thanks again... Cheers, Bill© • From: Stacie Hoskins [mailto:SHoskins@co.jeferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:26 PM To: seahorse0olympus.net; Bill Subject: FW: 11/4/2013 Consent Agenda Request- 2013 CPA ordinance Hi, Doug& Bill, Attached is the 2013 CPA adopting ordinance that the Board will consider Monday. I expect it to be on the consent agenda, so no need to attend unless you really want to. I'll keep you posted! Stade 4. qadie4. Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinsc co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary I 1 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:26 PM To: seahorse @olympus.net; Bill Subject: FW: 11/4/2013 Consent Agenda Request-2013 CPA ordinance Attachments: 2013CPA AdoptingOrd_Full.pdf; 2013CPA_BOCC AR_AdoptOrd.docx Hi, Doug& Bill, Attached is the 2013 CPA adopting ordinance that the Board will consider Monday. I expect it to be on the consent agenda, so no need to attend unless you really want to. I'll keep you posted! Sae&4. ? Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinsc co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 • Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:21 AM To: 'Bill'; 'seahorse @olympus.net' Subject: 2013 CPAs before Board Mon 10/7 Attachments: 2013-10-7_Final AR re Staff-PC Recommendation Report to BOCC.DOCX; 2013-09-18 PC Rec 2013CPA.PDF Hi, Bill & Doug, I will present your Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications to the Board of County Commissioners on Monday, Oct 7th sometime between 10:00 am—noon. Attached are my agenda request and the Planning Commission recommendation. The Board's final agenda will be available online here no later than tomorrow(Friday) mid-day. Please call or email with any questions. Staeie 4, qo¢(¢usd Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinsaco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 I ON yF coG� JEFFERSON COUNTY r� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment .. Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@cojefferson.wa.us 9SNI N c;c9 Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE; ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS;AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: October 2, 2013 PROPONENT: Gary McLuen John Boulton 2023 E.Sims Way#321 3590 E.Quilcene Rd Port Townsend, WA 98368 Quilcene,WA 98376 APPLICATION: 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket PROPOSAL Two (2)Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments: 1. MLA12-00274; McLuen Proposal requests a rezone of approximately 37 acres of land designated Rural Residential 1:20(RR 1:20)to Rural Residential 1:10 (RR 1:10); 2. MLA13-00045:Boulton Proposal requests a rezone of 12.7 acres of land designated Rural Forest 1:40 (RF 1:40)to become Prime Agricultural 1:20(AP 1:20). LOCATION 1. MLA12-00274; McLuen APN 901-054-003; Located at mile post 5 of SR 20 on the east side of SR 20, approximately 1.5 miles south of the Four Corners Rd/Discovery Rd/SR 210 intersection. 2. MLA13-00045: Boulton APN 802-141-005; Located at 780 Boulton Rd, Quilcene,WA 98376, approximately 0.7 miles south west of the northern Boulton Rd/US 101 intersection and 0.4 miles northwest of the southern Boulton Rd/US 101 intersection. NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. APPEAL PERIOD This final determination of non-significance is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments received on this proposal however none addressed the preliminary determination of non-significance. There is no additional comment period on the DNS. Any appeal of this determination on the basis of noncompliance with the provisions of RCW 43.21c (State En ironmental P. is may be made within 21 days to Superior Court. r oHoskins,SEPA Responsible Official Date 1/144�goN cb 1 O JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 Planning Commission Recommendation for 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Docket Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments Recommendation with Findings and Conclusions To: Board of County Commissioners, Chair John Austin; Department of Community Development, Director Carl Smith; and Interested public of Jefferson County Date: September 18, 2013 Attached: MLA12-00274 (McLuen) - Map of Proposed map Redesignation/Rezone MLA13-00045 (Boulton)- Map of Proposed map Redesignation/Rezone In preparing our recommendation, we have considered the staff report, the growth management indicators and other general guidance on required findings, and therefore do hereby declare the following findings and conclusions in support of our decision: A. Required findings as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.080(1)(b)(i-iii): JCC 18.45.080 Final docket—Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners review. (1)Planning Commission Review.All proposed amendments on the final docket shall be reviewed and assessed by the planning commission, which shall make a recommendation to the board of county commissioners after holding at least one open record public hearing. (a)Notice.The hearing before the planning commission shall be noticed by one publication in the official newspaper of the county at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing and by posting a copy of the notice of hearing in the Jefferson County Courthouse. This notice shall include the following: (i)The purpose(s)of amending and/or updating the Comprehensive Plan; (ii)The deadline for submitting comments on the amendments; and (iii)A tentative hearing schedule;continued hearings may be held by the planning commission but no additional notices need be published. (b) Required Findings—Generally. For all proposed amendments,the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators set forth in JCC 18.45.050(4)(b)(i)through(4)(b)(vii), as well as the following: (i)Whether circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located have substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (ii)Whether the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are no longer valid, or whether new information is available which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan;and (iii)Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County. Planning Commission findings: I. Circumstances have changed in the sense the economy in recent years has suffered through the"great recession", meaning less land development in the County and therefore slower growth than anticipated. II. The assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are still valid. The map changes proposed are consistent with the designation criteria in the Comprehensive Plan. Ill. The proposed amendments are consistent with widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County given they are consistent with the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Only the map is changing for these amendments. C. Inquiry to the growth management indicators as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.080(4)(c)(i-viii): 1. The proposals meet concurrency requirements for transportation. The proposed amendments should not adversely impact the level of county services. 2. There are no inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan. These amendments are for mapping changes that are consistent with the text of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed amendments will not result in a probable significant adverse impact to the transportation network,capital facilities, utilities, parks, or environmental features. 4. The proposal is physically suitable for the requested land use designations. Both are similar to the surrounding properties and their access to utilities and land uses. 5. The proposals are unlikely to create pressure to change the land use designation of other properties. 6. The site-specific proposals do not affect the land use and population growth projections that are the basis of the comprehensive plan. The proposed land uses will be consistent with surrounding land uses. 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 2 7. The proposed amendments are not located within an area that is currently under review for UGA designation. 8. The proposed amendments meet the requirements of GMA. The character of the rural area will not be affected by redesignating this property. Inquiry to the growth management indicators as per Jefferson County Code(JCC)Title 18.45.050(4)(b)(i-vii): 1. Growth and development as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan is occurring slower than anticipated due to economic conditions. 2. The capacity of the county to provide adequate services has diminished due to a decrease in tax revenue. The number of service providers in the County has not decreased and the County, with the exception of policy decisions made as a result of economic conditions, continues to be equipped to provide the same levels of service available at the time of Comprehensive Plan adoption. The County is in the process of implementing provisions for the lrondale/Hadlock Urban Growth Area (UGA) to have urban services, specifically sanitary sewer service and stormwater management. 3. There is sufficient urban land, as designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need. 4. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1998, the majority of assumptions made as part of the Plan continue to be valid. Amendments to GMA and other laws made by the State Legislature and precedent-setting decisions made by the Growth Management Hearings Boards influence local government implementation of GMA. Aerial photography and Lidar data is available today that wasn't available at time of Comprehensive Plan adoption. Such information allows study and analysis context that may provide substantiation for more refined land use designation boundaries. 5. Changes in countywide attitudes have not been revealed that necessitate any sweeping changes to the Plan, nor the basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement. 6. Since Comprehensive Plan adoption in 1998, the County has established an informal policy of considering "pattern of development" using a 50%threshold. Where properties are bordered by properties of a smaller size on 50% of their perimeter, the Planning Commission and Board have agreed such a"pattern of development" of smaller density may be supported. This 50% threshold within the larger context of the residential density designation criteria was not specifically considered during the adoption process or any of the annual amendment cycles for this parcel. 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 3 7. The Comprehensive Plan is consistent with both the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policy. In 2004, Jefferson County, pursuant to the Growth Management Act, conducted a review of the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC to ensure consistency between those documents and the Growth Management Act. The next periodic review is slated for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle in order to be complete by the June 30, 2016 deadline established by the State of Washington. D. The Record In addition to the guidance provided by GMA, the Countywide Planning Policies, the Jefferson County Code, and the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission finds: 1. This proposed amendment is based on findings as required by JCC '18.45.050 and 18.45.080. 2. The public hearing for this proposed amendment has been duly noticed per the requirements of JCC 18.45.080. 3. This proposed amendment has been duly assessed for environmental impacts via a SEPA Checklist, as required by Chapter 197-11 WAC (SEPA rules). 4. This proposed amendment recommendation is based on the record, following an open record hearing and following the close of the open record hearing, consideration by the Planning Commission of any written or oral comments. 5. This proposed amendment satisfies legal criteria. 6. This proposed amendment is being provided for a 60 day review to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services, as required by RCW 36.70A.106 (GMA). 7. Finding for MLA12-00274(McLuen): The County has and will maintain 26,893 acres designated rural residential. RR 1:20 is reduced by less than one-tenth of one percent, and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will, with passage of this amendment, still have the "variety of RR densities"that is required by the GMA. 8. Finding for MLA13-00045(Boulton): The Boulton farm is historical, continuously productive, and owned by the same landowner as the adjacent forest lands. Given the common ownership, Mr. Boulton has been able to manage the lands jointly. While historically beneficial, the applicant proposes it is not financially viable for a new farmer to purchase both the farm and the large forest land tracts. It is common practice for farmers to live on the land they farm. It is not always typical for foresters to live on the land they manage for timber. This historical benefit should not preclude the future division of the forest land from the home and farm as not separating the farm from the forest lands might cause the end of farming at this farm. Further, the unique nature of this farm, i.e., that forest lands are commonly owned with it, ensures this 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 4 action is not likely to set a precedent for future rezones of portions of forest land adjacent to agriculture. This action matches the Comprehensive Plan to the actual use of the property on the ground and continues natural resource activities on all affected land. A conservation easement is under development to ensure perpetual use of the property in agricultural use. The potential for more low density sprawl will be averted by adoption of this Comprehensive Plan amendment. Based on these findings, on September 18, 2013,the Jefferson County Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Final Docket and recommend that the BoCC approve the Planning Agency's request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as proposed. yy7 ei./7. Kevin Coker, Planning Commission Chair Date 2013CPA PC Recommendation fmdings.docx 2013 CPA Amendment Recommendation to BoCC Page 5 Appx.A.3,p.5-7 N ^C , W z a. C a - F' a fD 7� r � et,, a7 72 J CD xi V f^i Q vi CD 70 7 h oeLt C a — • r R` • ..,4 _, -- ._-______ 70 70 r N v C C Z w El 73 F N 7 m D 0 11 t 0 2 m . 0 a N N m T A ; C) Q Ci N C O 3 .. stz _ Q N N 5 .T1 o m a> CD 0 C 0 S T • w �} n G V7 O 0 0 a O N CD a m m -n N N v, -• . O P. rh =y m .. O (2m (12 0 m O ro C - CT CD 0. C en 0 C cn _ c: - cn M O 0 N eb CO _ 23 fly 'CS tEl ➢ CD 0 co U. 5 z 5 • y N :r: Y 11111 W ti Appx A.S,P. 5-11 — n 0 ut kVA g , o 1 ...... C" ib ._ ,. Y 'i w r . = r, O -` Z \ ■ C.` , .�-` fl! o .s w �L N O 'C Q N n O N o m '• ' v m .71. ' 0 o ta tw _ 0.0•72 M co a o rw.+� g(a Q L w r O m p a0 = O K N fl? �101\C = O d Q� iv fll C ..... cn CI O S , ,.. I mo_ C C f D m x 11 N 0 O .0 N =ell 72 o d y _ o • z . 0 s Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 4:47 PM To: 'Douglas G. Mason, Attorney at Law'; 'Bill' Subject: FW: PC: agenda & materials for 9/18 meeting next week(6:30pm @ Tri Area Comm Ctr) Attachments: 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_1-4.pdf.pdf; 2013_CPA_Staff_Rpt_Appendices_A.pdf.pdf; 2013 _CPA_Staff_Rpt Appendices_B-D.pdf.pdf; PC memo for 9-18-13-amendment of JCC 18.40.090 (9-3-13).pdf.pdf; PC Recommendation findings JCC 18.40.090 Preapplication fees (8-27-13).pdf.pdf; DCD Fees-PC memo for 9-18-13 (9-3-13).pdf.pdf; PC Agenda 9-18-2013.pdf Doug& Bill, Please see attached and below for the Planning Commission meeting on Sept 18th. Call or email me if you have any questions. Thanks! Stcreee Wodithed Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `l SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary . .. .............. . From: Planning Commission Desk Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 4:42 PM To: Planning Commission Desk Subject: PC: agenda &materials for 9/18 meeting next week(6:30pm @ Tri Area Comm Ctr) Hello Planning Commissioners and interested parties; Agenda & Materials In preparation for the September 18 regular meeting with two public hearings next week, please review the following materials: • September 18 Meeting Agenda (also attached) 2013 Comp Plan Amendments • Staff Report (also attached) • Appendices A.1 —A.5 (also attached) • Appendices B — D (also attached) UDC Text Amendment— Pre-Application Conference • Memo— MLA13-115 (also attached) • Staff Recommendation (also attached) 1 • Memo - Fees (also attached) Meeting Time & Location PLEASE NO E TIME & LOCATION- Meeting will be held at;6 3O:pm at.the Trt Area Community Cetner 1 0 IN, ally Rd, h!ma um); the Planning Commission encourages public attendance and rescheduled the meeting to occur after 5pm to allow greater participation. Member Attendance As a courtesy and to avoid an unexcused absence, please inform your Chair, Vice Chair and staff ASAP or no later than 11:00 am next Wednesday if you will not attend next week's meeting. Thanks, Michelle Interim PC Secretary <> <> <> <> <> <> Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 360.379.4450 http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PlanningCommission.htm <> <> <> <> <> <> NOTE: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Messages may be viewed by parties other than the intended recipient. SAVE PAPER-Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary! 2 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:50 AM To: 'bmarlow @olympus.net' Subject: McCluen Comprehensive Plan Amendment application Good morning, Bill, It was good talking to you yesterday. By now Michelle McConnell should have sent you an email about next week's planning commission meeting. You asked to see your application materials. They are now online here. Please let me know if you need anything else. I'll see you next week! Take care, Stacie A g0444rd Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskinsAco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `"A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 l 4:frillik4"as-6---11---Nr‘' L JEF FERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ` `� 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax p� www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment $IN Master Permit Application MLA: 13 -a r4 Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): eoP1-, P fLQi> G7fe1dss/r,474 Tax Parcel Number: 90/ Q,- / a 3 Property Size: `¢pg_oX, /1046 (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Property Owner(s)of Record: u/z 7iiJ e JV7c ue� Telephone: S(00— 3/-)9- 3 G G6 Fax: email: Mailing Address:9 0 e2 3 ,s;/-ilf i 4 32/ AA 7- /oc✓n7S&,� wi • �r,F36zr Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): (A.lr//e n-i S."7-7/92 16A• Telephone: ~3o/- 35/'S/Ci Fax: email: a#,L eater/104o sti Mailing Address: . ,j., , , A r Ad C < ■ - - What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑ Lot or Road .-. -: -- ❑Building ❑Critical Area St�ri • • 33-E I V E ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,M. _ - -- •,-.1 s-) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Cse EC(e),C(d),or C]'" ❑ Manufactured Home .❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D",or Unwed Ws C ficat. ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use 'Essential Ili Feddie j ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Lire Adjustment ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach ❑Short Plat**I `' -; j ❑ Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Flan** 1"=FFRSC[,:COUNTY ❑ Propane ❑Long Plat** ^"' nr ∎' :LAITY r El OPMFr ❑Sign ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD •mendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management El Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** O Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* E'Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: _ /Uorve DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate £ -)///r4,r,.-, s.. ,bi, to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). �/• OWNER SIGNATURE _: G /...--1--K 24-4e..---- Date: 2 /7 'u/ °t. By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the applicatio hat he or she wants pri notice. 7 Signature: ILL (l1. � Date: /Z/l 7 /241 1-- The action or actions Ap(ri(ant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferabl esponsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: 1 Date: (2/// 1? i't— G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Forms\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature. Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) F •:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: ype of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: 0 Sewer ❑ Addition 0 Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel 0 Concrete Total: _ Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: • / If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: / Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current / Proposed - IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: i Will you have Food'Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit.mark all items below that apply: I Underground Tank I Above ground Tank Size of,Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove I Fireplace Insert idiot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile H me? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you ■st also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all- property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propan- ..nk to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. ;' Square Footage Current Proposed t1 Office U -Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH Bld App Review: 2f°'Floor Heated Consistency Review: Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine Additional Section: Heated Basement Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport SUBTOTAL Decks 911/Rd Approach fee: Other TOTAL: $ Receipt Number: Cash/Check Number: ES'MATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: it market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish I Initials: G:\Peru itCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Forms\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc N k4elpft4ki JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Q. 0� 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 S Nei 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Application for Formal Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan / UDC Amendment' MLA# !2-P 0 2.7 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: M L00■1 For Comprehensive Plan amendments, applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community Development by March 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during the annual amendment process. Completed applications that are received after March 1 will be placed on the docket for the following calendar year. Applications for UDC amendments may be considered on a rolling basis. Applications that are incomplete (i.e., that do not include all of the information required below)will be returned to the applicant. Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application. Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2. A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 3. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee (as applicable), as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance, as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the followin• a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; ; ! ); i b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred(500)f .-6f the site; and c. The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of f e i e. D E n 2 0 2012 1 6. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit B," a description of the proposed Pan/UC amendment and any ag t,.d development proposal(s), if applicable. Applications for project-related !forma edesignation m st include plans, and information or studies accurately depicting existing and •ropo FEaig C& fgimprovemen s. Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and..•• 11 414dttglik9WittifiMITto ha e maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 7. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit "C," a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within the general vicinity [i.e., within a three hundred (300)-foot radius]. The exhibit must depict topography, wetlands and buffers, easements and their purpose, and means of access to the site. The intent of the exhibit is to clearly illustrate the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. 8. Please provide an explanation of why the �`amendment is being proposed. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) ., -64,2 —6pc.)7,4_41.102_ pri.eyLczx-- A7gat- /40-, ad-le7/4afe-gi c e eA• r vt ', if C - 4 9. ,( 0,5-v dai delozet_t‘ 'See JCC Chapter 18.45. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.7/13/2006 Page 1 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is: /_ 2 CJ /1-'70 /-7a 7''JJ > hi OrrA- 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is: /1—/C) CLeri do) , 11. The current use of the site is: IG 12. The proposed use of the site is: 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required, please prepare and label as "Exhibit D," proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in"bill"format,with text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts (e.g., sits). N 19 14. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit E," a thorough explanation of how the proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals, if any, meet,conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan'? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amend, c. How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? d. Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental services)? f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals, policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? g. Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network, capital facilities, utilities, parks,and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? h. Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? How is the subject parcel(s) physically suitable for the requeste' ri • •I--i- • ••r-uI•• - : ed land use development including, but not limited to the following: ; c--■y (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and �. r rn (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? i s L 0 x_412 11J j. Will the proposal, if adopted,create a pressure to change the land use-designation of other propel' . If the answer is yes, how would such change of land use designation on other propertiesae ip; Jr long-term •est interests of the county as a whole? Y f•rr 7 IT • k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County, and other applicable inter jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other local, state or federal laws? SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.7/13/2006 Page 2 15. The applicant hereby certifies that the statements contained in this application are true and provide an accurate representation of the proposed amendment; and the applicant(s) hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. �" , r 1 ,►�-- ) —//7 )ter/'1--- APPLICANT'S SIRE DATE 1. '''97 1 Y," —. i.91/ ) 2 d 1 -L• PROPERTY OWNER GNATURE DATE "Uel PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures, representative authorization is required if application is not signed by the owner.] ICUAMC � 1 r _`, 20 2012 il_-.)) Li W I JEFFERSON COUNTY UEP?.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.7/13/2006 Page 3 4 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: gA2C °� ��'�-2.. /3--le � E ` E II V E -J 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: D ! 0 LUI .J s Hi 4. Date checklist prepared: 1.2.-/3-Aq- 5. Agency requesting checklist: ) . &'• roT f JEFFERSON COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): _r.-_�F{'OC h:IIN 1Y DFUELOPMENT 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. i/e t/c¢ i tei>r ca. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. /v° 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) t/W''21 A.; /0 tle„t -t447L Q' y ��=E'er cw d 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. y, / N29, gvto,c9x,c, d(t. e/k, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other co-y? /'iet-pS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. SEF /*04 Cx/16e/ ['0 1/ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 40 e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. w y, f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. A.A0 g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? / "c-2 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, j ;m L , 1E U v generally describe. /je) '� I �— 1 1}t � 0 23i2 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any:pH JEFFERSON COUNTY n DEVELOPMENT 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. itio 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. 4)0 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. /if 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. /Jo 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan./0c) 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 4/o b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals... ;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. /(/NIL 4 0 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. 'due 2c e4-1 GA-)e---6(sza 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe.,t'' d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any:^/c/y( 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: e, ;j aspen, the evergreen tree:DEO,pine, i - ��shrubs grass C.—pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? lame, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any:_ p s 2 • 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: heron,6P,s bird other: mamma'Is: tfa bear,elk,beaver, th fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: ;I ,– i b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site Fa a 2012 �ff I Ir 5 Tv, i TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: /14-4/2- ":14'. 6-N C0--/ 5-r-7(e) 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. c' -77 C 0111 -et , a � /j ,,( , , //-'tom/ / ..a.--/ J ,J/ ps,F e,„4 t t 6 Ali_ 9- b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. MD c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: No 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. 4/0 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. /lip 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental'health hazards,if any: ,t ' - b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? 4,) � 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. / h4,,,� � yz, poW • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: i 8. Land and shoreline use ,� a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ��;�,'a c I /2.0-°-c < _1 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. ,ty�j yr ��c ciY1 c. Describe any structures on the site. / t ou2�, ...e - '- d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Ajv e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? / /U f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? ,,(J/ h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. es, 61 hf C ide 14,444441 *ma-- - Un&fab(e 5horeAlne 61 a iabill , E d a nest Cocas act -l�► yob `an o� cel a. s, y r v+rh,, is , F leta . i.FA i1xA y r'ianjipe�pi woui i esi kin a completed project.� qtr' """' j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ,y� k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Nil/ 7 • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land /' /� uses and plans,if any: e.z e-C,t' ,---,,(E -e s�z.t -=- L- 'r.-C- G:-,.(' (` `i-%z. -zK 1- t'�zt �r ; v- -Ce-G vt- - .4(.-�_- - Wiz---4- x-- 24_- `- rte C - 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing. 00 V11 b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. l j. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: r'UJN 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? /1/4--Ate_ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ft ( c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: N/14 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? IJ 'z,t b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? tohf. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? -'°u d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: /1)4 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. /A) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: movie 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe./"O b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ,v/l4 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: n co,.,.,p, 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. /16.4 y ,o9Qj t',Oc / „/^ L /troy) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Ai./0 C, c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? J4/9 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). Alb 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. ylla f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. Wen--(„ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any:/WA/ 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. )U b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. `Ur2.-< 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available a t the site: - ►� natural gas wat , efuse serv> is elepho e,sanitary sewereptic system o er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 77 1 `(V Date Submitted: /.C.7..J 241 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air;pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? rug-4-167- ov"y� Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? --- 4-evt-e .�� - O Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? AA Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline use inn ompatible with existing plans? e4"`blA �C Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? m, 4.4 G � Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. etie.z zf' fru./ 12 3 3 a� (8801 °°�°m.° ,... ,7 o rill' ��"" _I¢r;. Y,. 1--z>, o.J m 901042004 Section 5 (All) Sections 4 9 (West I/2) % I ", m• @�)' n, 3> TAX 4 "D ",::"• .. ^ 6.46 a. 9(,04002 P SHORT PLAT VP' LOT and Section 8 (North I/2) ; ; �a�.T) �',90.,R45E) 9 Q cW 1/2 N 1/2) O1 �m 9 00 O 9.89 a. Township 29 North Range I West n a�_ '" (5.2,._70,50 E_> Jefferson County, Washington -- 11 '/' °-°° :�""°' 'm• F _0 y ;'�` ___ I TAX 40 k TAX E(LS El&E2) {64 a.V w I � I V 1 1 901051025 , 901042001 ' O I 1 I TA%4 k TL TAX El 371 a. I� GOV'T LOT 4 (E I I 90%09026 . OF HWY, LESS I 1 901042001 As --_- 0 2kTL TAX E2 3.60 a TAX 4) ,'`1 GOVT LOT 3 ' 26.95 a. O� I , / (LESS W 1/2 N1/2) V / l 29.40 a. I,M cn 1I r U ,'T , I I 1.6e cn 4 / .. I , I I / I 9018 I / I Ax 82 / I 19.70 a. I I 82 I /� I I I Z v/ Q 1128 Ch. o W 1 901042001 �\ , ? I S 1/2 NW LOZ„I / J / 78.03 a. i ,\1 r,O '/$ I I I II - ,,7z-,-_-,_,-- 901051018 I I V TAX 38 \\`Y (k TL TAX 82) I O / ' J 5°. / B(LESS 6, , I a I k e°) 901051001 I / TAX 39 k TL T.8 / , 6.37 Ch. (LESS TL T.81 A 82) , / 1 6.76 a. C' / SCALE IN FEET % I I I 901042001 200 100 0 200 GOO / I GOV'T LOT 3(LESS W1/2 N1/2) i GOV'T LOT 4 (E OF HWY)LESS TAX 4 I S 1/2 NW, SW 1/4 SUBJ/EASE C2 ,,,•. °°'""°°' i >�,µC,.al =°, / % LESS TAX 5 & 6 M ' I 141.38 a. / I 1 1 �' 1 1 0 I I C(LESS o, maroon ) 1 n C1 k c2) G ;n1: el II a) 1 ».. 1 I 12•13 L •y 901043001 : �" - - - - - % TAX 5 o.,. : Cr'.y ® W/EASE G .,m1,<,:,. ,., 19.72 a. Q 0P -_-- i 901 54003 wawa, TAX I 722 11719191 55.97 0. 1 (CITY) �, >m a. I in. -0 I 1 l (m■■9 gc 'qr.; , 1- ( Q I c'.'` ."'° ;; o ~I ; 901054003 o 'j' I (WITH SEC 5)i l �S I 2.12 a. A n-m1 am pi,' % «i p I T 4,,`,P1 ° ...o.,M,1•, -m ; - -- il 25..°0 8749 --- - 0,- 'gyp ,04,... ■- - / I -a,a.a.�a ,m;.; , .. 2.x a 43t1:07.5' 8.� 'F''n ? -mm , «'5054 euc I I %2 -- ti w1L°o-�°iry L+--°)1 _I 111 a+��6 ▪-8 „ '% �4. F I 1 I I 1 / O I ,am 1r.n , .4, 4'' 41 5«°4'2 1,q' 574. I I ,M-7 I // I�� '« asp , u"0. o it 901092001 >!i;f�, I I N W 1/4 G� �. «° :'154"" SUBJECT TO EASEMENT � 0e Sm -a. 0.2 z I I 8 165.62 a. S , Cyr 11 y9 ___ „M, ti 901085001 N /I �Y 5116 TOT/S ESMT 'r`' /' SS fl 5«. �G� II0� J.50 a. V I u 42e V p^�+ ,, GJ 0 vj I I .m. G 901085002 �l 11 U LOT 2 5« -mn.w SUB TO BUT I/ .u. - l I °». `=Y 5 ew« 3uw 30402 ' 1'13.b R 53° $MOUNTAIN VIEW / VISTA,t T�\ 974600006 . I w°i4,°�m-° til \ \ LOT 8 9]{60000] 9:0600008 I, 8 u wm $e \ \ 3.46,,. a LOT] LOT8 $/ rj I^m \ \ 3.81 a. 7.44 0. I u y m n 1 9:4600005 I I 4.6 5 I/ 7 :47T:"' 4,cn /C-''''' ..83 a. I /// I LOT 9 I�>' IA/ fI I i ti1 ICl/ w uu.`.: 1 p, f -. :T: oo: \ r0 w 901093003 aftgary 901093007 2 W/ASE 5 FO' `" , .WOODMAN �1 I 1 , LOT 2 0 �aa +m�rw.I •- 3.65 a. ,i/ 904600011 8.`a 314.03 388.01 T. _ -.� l -'C+w.I I I, A.76°. A m 0 y 1 \ I-tinily"I ,I' "1610 0, ^Ka, \ 901093006 ° I '� II / , 31°.40 ,II °I TAX 6 W/EASE / A. l lI '3 I i 974600012 0, 5.26 a. 'Ull- oT 1z s n\ 901092002 ;B1 1 • ;l; s.42M.. 614.05 TAX 1 •' o I 43.16 a. __ -.:3 / SAS=I 8 974600014 • I \ 901093004 LOT 14 I ,, TAX 4 W/EASE a 2r 3/ 4!I�O,r ♦ sae 0. 1 01 5.23 a. /fly+ I j t� , 9]4600013 ';.TI, N 1 / //4 C I GG 6w�2""'..a 1 f a LOT 0 1 .,IJYJ+�[�y11 /, a CD (�a1 Ess 315 11 ' /. ' .0A,5 a 5 901093001 I 511.78 I� c) p c I , // SW1/4 0,\ 901093005 <111 I I (LESS TAX 1-7) Ol TAX 5 !`� X I OI I, No �/ I 9,4 S/EASE �, W/EASE N I j ,V t I I 901084003 /'/' a 51.67 a. 5.18 a. m I l X /� TAX 45 l 1 1 _� rn I r7 S:e I i yG lsas a. I 901084018 I 1 A8 I 'EI' v� I , E'/2 SE SE .11 8193 �.r� O� I dt'!' ,'9010(5054 W 1 \..e, I I WI/2 SE SE _____ =I 971.52 15.11 a. a_ �,/,. , }4 �,� 1 901083003 /' ., I / 2.1 50 TAX 50 3 , ROAD 900%10 0003 I l 2.12 a. 5.504( q,/I N LAKE 90109(3002 0 068 l .4 // ANDERSO 018`n. I I Go 400,, oa LAKE I gOhD 901093001 901083001 I SW 1/4 901083001 �80°� i 1\ TAO e' //I/401083003 11 9010830/ 901064018 27.63 a. (LESS TAX 1-7) \ 5 / 50 2,$ I I (W1/2 SE SE) 500205E SE) .. 4 ,1 ,, 3.84 a. 8 S/EASE ,, J 1)'r,.6 . $ w alas-- o o g $ r6 s µ�n` W s ; f- o I x a 5 - '�j 1 o U N O co o t. 4 ti o .cc $ i -8g ,5 � � N O fn @ V u c m � iln w W m EaggB - Z x � �O Et E § n w0 q r. 0 $ h r § 8 g �_ $ ¢E 1i 1-� -sr,;1 8 i E ° a 1 :< z §Z �- c'�'o�Wgc6h i w e W� �$( ay 0 3 pO* 2 C ■ /� 4 NV Q X2_42RtR vr{eN 2 WF �. 4pti1,N��2 O z .- Wi Yy'U tri tai J .-„, 2 §tit cu kt' 4 4 VnY b! ° u z 8p 0 �p ¢y�� �I�,,, �{2y�� 2Wl=A ct iii z ,A i 2i V2 WM UW cn N 4 srrgu ` I.craft / 0A--,_ 1 2 -. I --'---"' ' ' '.---. \)1\`,)\V- w 6 O t.( f i • "4 � Jr - ..,_gym,!°rte, �,.r- -.��` /� -` - -'—' hM..) i f 5ti gm)1 - tea...__. _.. T Z o � ,_ .! 1 t _ w+' t t M ` PPP Q a,../..........<5,0/.... .. - . o \mss\ o �1(Y`�-s'' \ - v_1 77 -" sz, ..:---ifl: I- ... I. �'"-. ,. -....,•,..."-- -,*".., ---'..77 ...... __, g _____ N_________ , _ 11D0 • >„ 0, I. ri--.. - Nu _ 1 84 ,„ ......., ,..4 Map Output , Page 1 of 1 ! -6)Ch rb i+ a_. ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map r ! I ' f 3,•_,yE.,i /, 901064002 I / / / 1 901054001 +'/ 901054017" ,■>/'I I( 'zC,'0540',, 1 / , / I 9,,^054r '• t - t/ Legend Selected Features 9410420X3` JC Roads 901454044 , - 0-:,',3,...,4005 301054012 t : Parcels-H 0,54.'''0 001054012 ; 901043001 Landslide Hazard '30'054003 / sm. __ _!�lrcr_ Iltgh Moderate • 901054003 1 Ai ,florti-r' `-'-'•''`•- 901061036 ■ I . w5 t?'ra i 94,0g02t 0010411025 Swi _vU23 "•r .. __ 901081030 i FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Dec 20 09:12:08 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&... 12/20/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Each I b;-1--- C ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map / jil,,,,,,,,,,, 1,?..:,C-12,_:,0" 9...,.: ViTilli w L: t Yt'`{ l r( y (1111910,,,,,,,f Legend t 71 Selected Features 11_ JC Roads I r _t_�t \ — 9"'Q54C.25X,'_r1C'2 li Parcels-H i'y-' yt`-':c.......,..',-.:54,-:„z Shoreline Slope Stability 11 I Staale '_;ytrvva I I Intarnead tale Ji n Unease '®f Unstable Recent Landslge l ., + a des-1,10a Old Landslide fr yt.:°;i-i Mad dlntl � x'--It ■_ _� I r'+ cyqut'n4o.t r. \ jf 4. :-.;.::;C:::.:',.:,',1, C�",9'I'_OlT'i CS?'f.'J-Y_^':L'L�.,al'.i /=====1:1 911 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Dec 20 09:11:39 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&... 12/20/2012 N N N 512600 512700 512800 512900 513000 513100 513200 513300 513400 513500 513600 513700 2'23" o // o0 48 2 o n o LO k o II 'w:'ii (00 O1 N II k' M M ! a) K o II � o o co III N fi , II - / co 0 11 N co o N I k< 11 O M ill' o 1I M O en O F N in po // ` o N O M // / ' : . . i ..) o O N M 0 0 0 J, y" 0 O O ■ // , N Y". M M J in 1 /I s i t ' O 0 O O 0 O rn x 0) r e . 17-1;M _ af t r .3 fi its i it �.x. 'ter o.. 1'• • ,a 00 O co oa0i m II r ww m , O 0 �R ."l e O a Z - ii O , co ! . �; t .. O 4.II Q\ 0 \----'-------- ". 6.7 I At co to a 00 o c v o) .4 4 '141Wit_. -- . o) tC) �I\ _ .. M niithpert Ln �/ * ' \ 4 . 0o II >4 'k' N t N • to fA P ,°1'31" .` /LY •.ar_ t' 48°1' 512600 512700 512800 512900 513000 513100 513200 513300 513400 513500 513600 513700 to Ex�i - ID Scale: 1:7,600 if printed on A size(8.5"x 11")sheet. ( b'- "' v W N Meters N Cvli A 0 50 100 200 300 .FP Pt Soil Map-Jefferson County Area,Washington 6)4111 (_ j+. McCluen Soils Map Map Unit Legend Jefferson County Area,Washington(WA631) Map Unit Symbol Ord Unit Name Acres In AOl Percent of AOI CmD Clallam gravelly sandy loam,15 to 30 40.9 v 14.5% percent slopes Co Coastal beaches 12.9 4.6% TuC Tukey gravelly loam,0 to 15 percent 186.0 66.0% slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 239.8 85.0% Totals for Area of Interest 282.0 100.0% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/14/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 axh; bi+- .b N CO 16 O c0 O O N -_ C �- G W N 'O tll W g,� y 1N w 8 O e 3 ', E 0 2. 8o, n g w Y E a . 5 Z E ai 'i3 a3 C' m a 15 E W S 1n N W e w C�j Z N 2 w a le o c_ r, 9 A O g Z Q O sq' C CD ,W $ ,b o 0 0 QC 8 oo E oo w m .,. O 8 8�N £ V W E2 a 8m = a T Z z c m W .4 0 8 E az am 3 zct E c^ 8 o 051 E > E c m �d `° W E "?..c _ _ cv2 . .0 h. E T 0 % .� 2.0 0 .§ p T C ,C7 NW -8.o :62 C 6 a (4 m g t -0 ....0 7 NT G 6 w 6 a i c W m 8 t C •E 7 T W E-2 z W E 2 ,o 1m o28 rm "o roEcoE c 2 � 3 w E E w a E co c) � S cocn o P 8 E 's T co g..... „, Cl. o Um L_ � E C CO '8" z 1 u)T E € v CO M CO co Z ce > sO co I Fo u..reflus 812 — D Z -.■ J f LL LLI co o a 3 i- W -J d. a i co D S Q ar CO ss E a' 1 1 5 o U (2 s a2 c7 > c v JS 04 p n q c G. i o i • I — zi O I C' • 1,, • • • U e: C> Exhibit E ( eSh'cn 1Li c l icdIf�► ri►) A. No B. Yes,there is new information,the property since the comp plan adoption has undergone a BLA that combine two properties...One of the properties was designated 1-10 and the other was designated 1- 20...This created one single property with two density designations...It would be our intent to make them both 1-10 density... C. The surrounding properties on two sides of the subject property are 5 acres or less...lt is my understanding,based on Chapter 3 of the Comp Plan and on previous decisions by the B.O.C.C.,we would qualify for a designation of 1-5...However,we are asking for the lesser density of 1-10 designation because it makes more sense for the property in question and this is consistent with the surrounding area and county wide planning policies... D. Yes E. No F. Yis 11100die$W 000110tR 1:5) kteatimfinoist of*bilbord+ eto �a with ini theOWNSe a; rates ;,resSrbad dial; for Ong ii S tfa leaNla l te1 11 10 sou OR 1:10) oprwr fit► 10001143400*ice,*MOM ims r 41"1104*-13.40104141111 PVC*Idscaastat areas of sDe byribriebb,cted by critical areas. Single family residential Rural Residential 1 unit/20 acres(RR 1:20) Located in an area with similar development patterns; Adjacent to Urban Growth Area,Resource Production Land or State/National Forest Land;parcels in coastal areas of similar size;includes land affected by critical areas;includes private timberlands;includes agricultural lands. The above language taken from Chapter 3 of the Comp Plan is a reference of our compliance with the Comp Plan... G. No H. No I. (i)The access is currently and will be in the future provided by State Hwy 20. (ii)The provisions for utilities are currently and will be in the future provided by PSE for power needs and the Jefferson County PUD for water... (iii)Yes,this proposal is consistent with existing and planned surrounding land uses...See attached Exhibit"A"... J. No,properties on three sides currently have the same designation(1-10)that we are asking for....Or is of lesser density.All properties to the east within 500 ft.are either long term commercial forest land or in holding forest land and have no possibility for change... K. No L. N/A M. Yes,again the property would still meet the"rural character"element and meets rural requirements...(view vicinity maps exhibit"A") CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR • Parcel 901054003 Printed: December 26, 2012 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner COM03-00026 MC LUEN F Application Received: 3/13/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 5/29/2003 WENT TO ARCHIVES 2/3/06 Small out buildings without proper permits No findings, conditions, or permissions found. FPA2608103 MC LUEN F Application Received: 10/20/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/9/2006 Case Finaled: 11/15/2006 10 acre timber harvest - No findings, conditions, or permissions found. FPA2611026 MC LUEN C Application Received: 3/22/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 20-acre timber harvest No findings, conditions, or permissions found. FPA2611456 MC LUEN F Application Received: 10/4/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/19/2011 Case Finaled: 10/20/2011 20-acre timber harvest No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD01-00455 MLA01-00429 MC LUEN I F J SMITH Application Received: 8/8/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/6/2001 Case Finaled: 4/23/2002 (ADU) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W/ATTACHED SHOP 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 14, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area on a portion of the site; Landslide Hazard-level 1 majority of site; and Eagle Territory entire site. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (see attached). 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500) feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 7.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-800-11(1)(b)(i). 8.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 4,600 square feet of impervious surface and 10,300 square feet of land disturbing activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 1 of 8 Cases , Name Review Type Status Planner 9.) A Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 10.) The parcel is a legal conforming lot that is designated Rural Residential (RR 120) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, effective 8/28/98. 11.) Based on a phone call from Shelly Ament, Wasington Fish and Wildlife, the Eagle nest is over 2,000 feet away from the proposed shop with guest house. There is "no conflict." 12.) This approval is for a shop with living quarters only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 13.) The revised site plan dated 8/29/01 as submitted with the building application dated August 8, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 8/29/01/8/31/01 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 14.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 15.) Minimum setback from the adjacent commercial forest designated property located east, shall be 130 feet. This is the maximum practicable setback based on site constraints as determined by a field visit on 8/29/01. 16.) Minimum setback from SR 20 shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 17.) Maximum impervious surface cover shall not exceed 25 percent. 18.) The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. 19.) The applicant shall comply with each of the criteria of Section 4.20.3-4 of the UDC, as per the applicant's August 27, 2001 letter. 20.) A standard critical area waiver(CAR00-00527)was finaled by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on 3/1/01 for a conventional septic system. 21.) A septic system and drainfield was installed on the parcel under permit SEP00-00265. BLD03-00269 MLA03-00227 MC LUEN I EXP S HOSKINS Application Received: 4/29/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/4/2003 Case Finaled: MAIN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on June 2, 2003 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Level 1 Landslide Hazard Area (slight), Fish & Wildlife Habitat (Eagle), Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area, Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone(SIPZ). 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 2 of 8 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 6.) Washngton State Department of Fish &Wildlife commented on the building permit application (MLA01-00429)and determined proposed development on this parcel was greater than 2,000 feet from an eagle nest and is not in conflict with Eagle Habitat. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 8.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 9.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 10.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 11.) This parcel is mapped within a Level 1 Landslide Hazard Area (slight hazard). A site visit conducted by Development Review staff May 15, 2003 determined no defined top or toe of a slope exists within the vicinity of the proposed Single Family Residence. 12.) The minimum setback from adjacent forest lands was reduced administratively to 130 feet for this parcel during review of the single family residence(ADU)with attached shop(MLA01-00429). The Administrator has determined this applies to the proposed single family residence proposed under this application. 13.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 14.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 6,739 square feet of impervious surface and 5,400 square feet of land disturbing activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. 15.) A Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 16.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 17.) Minimum setback from SR 20 is 50 feet. Minimum side setbacks are 5 feet. Minimum setback from the Eastern parcel boundary adjacent to designated forest lands is 130 feet. 18.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes rooftops, driveways, concrete, etc. 19.) The parcel is a legal conforming lot designated as Rural Residential 1:20 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map adopted August 28, 1998. 20.) A septic permit(SEP00-00265)was finaled April 10, 2002 for a system with capacity of 480 gallons per day. The associated critical area review(CAR00-00527)was finaled by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on 3/1/01 for the conventional septic system. 21.) A building permit(BLD01-00455)was finaled April 23, 2002 for a single family residence with attached shop. This structure is to become the Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)with approval of this application. Associated Consistency Review was conducted under MLA01-00429. 22.) SR 20 is a principal arterial road. The road approach is existing, and an address of 4934 SR 20 has been assigned to the parcel. 23.) Potable water is provided by an onsite well(USR00-00094). Awell located in the area of the permitted drainfield was abandoned February 27, 2003 and documented with the County under USR02-00010. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 3 of 8 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 24.) A minimum of four (4)onsite parking spaces are required for the single family residence and accessory dwelling unit (ADU). 25.) The revised site plan as submitted with the building application on May 22, 2003 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated June 2, 2003 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 26.) This approval is for a Single Family Residence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. SUB04-00031 MLA04-00473 MCLUEN I F M LINDBLAD Application Received: 7/30/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/10/2004 Case Finaled: 1/20/2005 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMEN I 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 16, 2004 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Eagle Habitat Areas, Level I Landslide Hazard Areas. 2.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 3.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 4.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 5.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes:Vine Maple(Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(SymphoricarposAlbus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 6.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 7.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 8.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 9.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 10.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(j). 11.) This approval is for a Boundary Line Adjustment only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 4 of 8 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 12.) The proposal complies with UDC Section 7.2.1.a(4) in that the proposal is to correct situations wherein an established use (well) is located across a lot line. 13.) Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(1), the proposal will not create an additional lot, tract, or parcel. 14.) Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(2) , the proposal is not within a binding site plan. 15.) Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(3), the proposal will not relocate an entire lot, tract, or parcel. 16.) Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.1.b(4), the proposal is not inconsistent with the conditions of approval of any restrictions or covenants. 17.) The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar: JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC The intention of this boundary line adjustment is to correct situations wherein an established use is located across a lot line crossing zoning district boundaries. This boundary line adjustment will not serve as a rationale for a future re-zone application. 18.) JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC Current Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) maps identify the presence of an Environmentally Sensitive Area(ESA) such as stream, wetland, flood, landslide hazard area, erosion, aquifer recharge area, SIPZ, fish and wildlife habitat, shoreline, etc., lying within and/or adjacent to the revised parcels encompassed by this Boundary Line Adjustment. Prior to any land disturbing activity or construction activity, applicant/owner shall contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development regarding compliance for such ESA's. Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee issuance of a building permit within said parcel(s). Such determination is dependent on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and ESA requirements. 19.) The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar: JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC This Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee that each resulting parcel has adequate soils to support on-site septic nor does this Boundary Line Adjustment guarantee that each resulting parcel is guaranteed a buildable area. Applications for septic and building permits will be reviewed at time of submittal of such application for consistency with current state and county codes and ordinances. 20.) Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee the approval of any future county permits and/or approvals. 21.) Consistent with UDC Section 7.2.3.c, the applicant/surveyor is responsible for recording the Statement of Intent with the Jefferson County Auditor and referencing said statement of Intent AFN on the face of the survey. (An Excise Tax Affidavit will need to be completed for the Statement of Intent. An Excise Tax Affidavit is also required for every document that will be recorded such as Quit Claim Deeds or Statutory Warranty Deeds.) The survey mylar and recording fee of$85 (plus$1 for additional names and $5 for each additional sheet payable to the Jefferson County Auditor shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for department signatures and recording of said mylar. 22.) All Compensating tax must be paid before recording of Statement of Intent. 23.) The intention of this boundary line adjustment is to correct situations wherein an established use is located across a lot line crossing zoning district boundaries. This boundary line adjustment will not serve as a rationale for a future re-zone application. SUB06-00033 MLA06-00544 MARLOW I F M FARFAN Application Received: 10/2/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/15/2006 Case Finaled: 12/22/2006 Boundary Line Adjustment 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 10, 2006 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: conservancy shoreline designation; F&W; seismic; landslide hazard areas; SUSC aquifer recharge area; coastal SIPZ; commercial forest lands adjacent. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 5 of 8 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 5.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500) feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 6.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 7.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 8.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 9.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 10.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 11.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 12.) This approval is for a Boundary Line Adjustment only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 13.) The proposal complies with JCC Title 18.35.060.1(a) in that the proposal is to create more suitable building lots. 14.) Consistent with JCC Title 18.35.060.2(a), the proposal will not create an additional lot, tract, or parcel. 15.) Consistent with JCC Title 18.35.060.2(b), the proposal is not within a binding site plan. 16.) Consistent with JCC Title 18.35.060.2(c), the proposal will not relocate an entire lot, tract, or parcel. 17.) Consistent with JCC Title 18.35.060.2(d), the proposal is not inconsistent with the conditions of approval of any restrictions or covenants. 18.) Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee the approval of any future county permits and/or approvals. 19.) The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar. JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC Current Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) maps identify the presence of an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA)such as stream, wetland, flood, landslide hazard area, erosion, aquifer recharge area, SIPZ, fish and wildlife habitat, shoreline, etc., lying within and/or adjacent to the revised parcels encompassed by this Boundary Line Adjustment. Prior to any land disturbing activity or construction activity, applicant/owner shall contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development regarding compliance for such ESA's. Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee issuance of a building permit within said parcel(s). Such determination is dependent on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and ESA requirements. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 6 of 8 Cases Name Review TVDe Status Planner 20.) The following notice shall be placed on the final survey mylar. JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE TO PUBLIC This Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee that each resulting parcel has adequate soils to support on-site septic nor does this Boundary Line Adjustment guarantee that each resulting parcel is guaranteed a buildable area. Applications for septic and building permits will be reviewed at time of submittal of such application for consistency with current state and county codes and ordinances. 21.) CONSISTENT WITH RCW 84.56.345 CURRENT YEAR AND ALL DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO RECORDING THE STATEMENT OF INTENT. 22.) Consistent with JCC Title 18.35.080 (3), the applicant/surveyor is responsible for recording the Statement of Intent with the Jefferson County Auditor and referencing said statement of Intent AFN on the face of the survey. 23.) The survey mylar and applicable recording fee payable to the Jefferson County Auditor shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for department signatures and recording of said mylar. 24.) An Excise Tax Affidavit will need to be completed for the Statement of Intent. An Excise Tax Affidavit is also required for every document that will be recorded such as Quit Claim Deeds or Statutory Warranty Deeds. It is the applicants' responsibility to file these instruments with Jefferson County Auditor in order to convey the ownership of the adjusted land. 25.) This parcels have been designated as RR 1:5, RR1:10, and RR1:20 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. The southern parcels abut commercial forest lands. 26.) The lots, parcels or tracts described within this Boundary Line Adjustment have not been evaluated for their suitability to support an on-site sewage system, no soils were evaluated on the lots. Sewage disposal systems have not been approved for the lots, parcels or tracts contained within the BLA. On-site sewage disposal system(s) shall meet design standards and regulatory requirements in effect at the time of application for a sewage disposal permit. ZON12-00033 MLA12-00274 MC LUEN I P Application Received: 12/20/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: COMP PLAN AMENDMENT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE02-00016 MC LUEN F S HOSKINS Application Received: 2/22/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/28/2002 Case Finaled: Single Family Residence with attached garage(1-story) No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR00-00527 MC LUEN F M POKORNY Application Received: 12/11/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/8/2001 Case Finaled: 3/8/2001 septic system for single tamily residence 1.) The application was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center staff on 12/8/00 for the potential presence of critical areas regulated under the provisions of the Ordinance, and the following critical areas were confirmed as potentially present on the subject property: eagle habitat area, low landslide hazard, susceptable aquifer recharge area, and adjacent commercial forest. 2.) Acting upon the above information, Jefferson County staff conducted a site inspection of the subject property on 12/15/00 and confirmed the existence of the following critical areas and/or their associated buffers on the property: adjacent commercial forest land 3.) Critical aquifer recharge areas are defined as vulnerable aquifer recharge areas, vulnerable seawater intrusion areas, and special aquifer recharge protection areas and shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance. 4.) On 12-18-00 a request was sent to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine whether an eagle management plan was needed. Although wintering bald eagles use the subject property for perching sites, no active nests are located within a quarter mile of the parcel, therefore an eagle management plan is not required. 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) Designated long term forest lands are located on theEastern adjacent property, on which a variety of forest related activities may occur that are not compatible with residential development. These activities include spraying, pruning, harvesting, blasting, drilling, rock curshing, and vehicle movements, which can generate dust, smoke, noise and odor. Forest or mining activities performed in accordance with county, state, and federal laws are not subject to legal action as public nuisances. 7.) Designated (rural/commercial)forest lands are located on the eastern adjacent property. According to the Jefferson County UDC 3.5.3 (c), buffer and development restrictions are required on property located adjacent to designated forest lands. 8.) The proposed building location as shown on the sewage disposal permit application has not been reviewed or approved under the Critical Areas Ordinance. Review/Approval of this Sewage Disposal Permit does not preclude any subsequent review and conditions which may be placed on future permits including building permits. The Permit includes critical area review for the sewage disposal system only. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 7 of 8 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SOM00-00265 MC LUEN F Application Received: 4/10/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. USR02-00010 MC LUEN F Application Received: 3/1/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/27/2002 Case Finaled: well abandonment in areaitted drainfield No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ00-00279 MC LUEN P Application Received: 12/8/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP00-00265 MC LUEN F Application Received: 12/8/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/15/2001 Case Finaled: 4/10/2002 1.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of both septic tanks. If both tanks are not installed at the time of final inspection a re-inspection fee will be required prior to final sign off of the permit. 2.) A riser is required to grade with a secured lid over the D box 3.) A 1200 gallon septic tank is required for 4 bedrooms as designed. 4.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 5.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 6.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 7.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the inlet and outlet of the septic tank. Minimum 24" riser over inlet. 8.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 9.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 10.) Approval of this onsite sewage permit that includes an accessory dwelling unit does not assure that a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit will be approved. Building permit applications are subject to the requirements at the time of application, of the Jeff. Co. Building Code, Zoning Ordinance, Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Land Use Procedures Ordinance as well as any other environmental approvals duly adopted by Jefferson County, the State of Washington or any other agency with Jurisdiction. 11.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the installer is required prior to final approval. USR00-00094 MC LUEN F Application Received: 12/4/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/13/2001 Case Finaled: 8/13/2001 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 12/26/2012 Page 8 of 8 Map Output Page 1 of 2 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 4,,,rii I i *. r I A At http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 12/26/2012 Map Output Page 2 of 2 Legend Selected Features JC Roads Parcels-H County Zoning MPR-SF Tracts Rural Resident al 1:5 laRural Resident al 1:10 Rural Resident on 1:20 MPR.Sing leFamily ■ MPR-Mundaintty %I PR Rescrt Convicts Parks and Recreation ■ 'APR-Open Space ■ Rural Forest . Commercial Forest In holding Forest ■ Newry industrial ■ Airport CPF ■ MPR•VnagcCenter ■ AP 1:20 ■ Rural VnagcCantor ■ Resource Based Ind. Light Industrial MPR-Racreai ton Waste Mgmt EPF LI M LL'C ■ Crossroads-GC ■ Crossroads-CC ■ Crossroads.NC ■ AL 1:20 LIGA-Urban Consriorciai UGA-Urban Light Industrial UGA-MDR UG II DR UGA-Puohc UGA LDR tit`0" UGA-Vrsdor Oriented Commarcal MPR BRN Orinnon CF-80'M R LO Commercial Forest M moral Resource Overlay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Dec 26 16:40:07 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 12/26/2012 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:901054003 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: GARY MC LUEN MARIA BO1t1 MC LUEN 2023 E SIMS WAY # 123 PORT TOWNSEND WA 983686905 Site Address: 4932 HIGHWAY 20 PORT TOWNSEND 98368 Section: 5 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: SE1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum(1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 111 Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S5 T29 R1W I TAX 37 I BND TGTH THRU BLA#108277 Fair; 5 a Ott http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=90105400... 12/26/2012 a -I ) x fi 0) co -1 -b x -1 -1 co 0) -- -- 0) -a cr) 03 x D CD r-I- X CO 0 -5 -0 0) 0 - 'O -5 -5 0 0) < Cl CD 0) 0 CD 0" X CC -- CD CC CD CD C7 CD r+ O CD - C X -5 E -3 -- CD r 0 m # cc rn - CD CD 0 CO - -5 o_ 0 0 0 CD --• 0 0 CD O X CD CJ C7 C] X I- o Cn rn - 0 0 0 0 C C1) O Ca) O r+ - co 3 n) 3 G7 C7 - r+ C7 07 -I co G7 O O D D (=I -a C Z 13. Cl CD 7o ry 70 70 X 0) CO r o x 0 -I CA) H -< -0 CO C -I D 1- CD -I rn -I W N CD 70 -I m 3 I x z c) -J CD o_ m C7 O 07 C7 - -I D X. X Cr) o rn = 70 N r o z I-I -I r -I G7 - CD co 3 m = D D n -I X o v O) m cs) -I m o x 70 = 70 -- z z o a --C 70 0 0 0 X 3 70 07 C 01 -0 rn D co rn I- - m o -< Cl) m co 0 70 o_ r Cl) r cn - X # C a -< X v m X # -- -• Z H O 3 7 N z O 3› O- CD CA) C C7 r CO CO O OD (= s. 0) N -i E w M C o —1 rn rn o_ - 70 CO C3 I 0 C OD Q CO CD CD CD 0 Cn 0 0 - -I CD — —S 3 v r 0 7o O rn n CD 0 a' n �1 C!) = S S C -- I CO CO H Cl r+ l Cn O O M 1 H C 0 co O � Z CO r+ C1 70 3 II CL O O O r cn o_ O ,�1 m C- �1 no - CD O C, N O H o O H O s, rn CS N m .o O c o H O 7O