Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBSP87-00001 - WITHDRAWN v Deanna D. Mueller Hoh River Development 1305 E. Howell #109 Seattle, WA 98122 ( 206 ) 374-9185 Forks ( 206 ) 726-9801 Seattle January 30, 1989 V) Rachel Nathanson Jefferson County Planning and Building Department P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms . Nathanson: Attached is a copy of the original environmental checklist . The following listed information will reflect the changes in the overall plan for our project . There were so few changes I thought it would be best to highlight them in this manner . PROPOSAL AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Build and operate a destination convalescent resort that provides continuous health care, to long and short term patients . 100 convalescent rooms , housing for staff , lodge and RV spaces for visiting families of patients in the facility, cabins , full service restaurant , 18 hole golf course, pool /spa recreational facility, gas pump for resort vehicles and guests , helicopter pad, stables , covered riding arena, managers residence, out buildings , barns , parking, pro shop, coffee shop , landscaped grounds , paths for walking and riding. Proposal will cover approximately 280 acres . This destination convalescent resort will be operational year round; providing service to convalescing patients and visitors to the patients , along with the restaurant , stables and goif course which will be open to the public. AIR 9 . Temporary emissions during construction dirt/dust from roads and heavy equipment exhaust . Operations - heating/cooling system exhaust , wood smoke, laundry, auto, kitchen, maintenance vehicles , golf cart exhaust , incinerator exhaust . 11 . Incorporate into overall plan regulations pertaining to emissions control . Exhaust systems to be professionally designed. GROUNDWATER 19. Waste - domestic sewage, restaurant waste, livestock waste, laundry, clorinated pool water , medical wastes . Systems will be of required size by county and state health departments . System to serve maximum occupancy of entire facility. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 31 . Electricity, wood burning, natural gas , generators , gasoline. Energy sources will be for heat , lights , safety systems , cooking back up power , medical equipment , automobile fuel . LAND AND SHORELINE USE 47 . 125 plus employees/maximum occupancy for facility to be determined. HOUSING 51 . Private residence for managers and executive personnel . Dormitory type housing for employees ( number of units to be determined) . TRANSPORTATION 70. Existing private roads on property will be up graded to handle additional traffic - grading, gravel , etc. additional private driveways will be on property to allow for maintenance vehicles to access property. Public Works Response to this item on the original checklist was : Should include Oil City Road ( a county road ) will need to be imporved from US Hwy 101 through proposed development . The reason for improvement is increased traffic from 220 trips to 1000 trips per day. 72 . Public Works Response to this on original checklist was : Should read 1000 - 1100 trips per day. This completes any changes that would be made to the environmental checklist and original plan. Also attached is a revised site plan. If you have additional questions or need additional information to determine if we will need to re-submit these documents please contact me at the above Seattle number . Sipere y, `' Deanna D. Mueller Hoh River Development PS: Maps , photos , etc. were submitted with the original checklist . • • • • • • • JEFFERSON COUNTY • • • • .ENV I i ON MENTAL CHECKL I ST .. • • • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCfI 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal; reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done; and help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • PROPONENT; Deanna D. Mueller - Ruth King/Wayne E. Johnson ADDRESS: " Rt 1 , Box 137 Forks , WA 98331/3047 - 24th W ##6 Seattle, WA • 98199 TELEPHONE: mom ({206) 374-9185 (o1£ K (206) 281-9549 • • YAUTIIORIZED'PEPRESENTATIVE. (contact): -__ ADDRESS: • • • TELEPHONE: "(home) • (business) • • • • DIRECTIONS • This checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The questions apply to the entire proposal, including those phased over a period of time or on separate parcels of land. • Answer each question accurately and completely to avoid unnecessary delays in processing this checklist. If you do not know an answer, write "unknown", or if a question does not apply, write • "not applicable." • Answers to some questions may require special expertise or technical assistance from qualified • persons. The cost of obtaining such information is the responsibility of the proponent. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, Leases, permits, etc. ) that may further describe the proposal or be required by Jefferson County. Contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department for assistance in_completing the checklist and for information on the administrative procedures required for it's processing. PLEASE PRINT IN BLACK OR BLUE INK OR TYPE EACH ANSI:ER. CO NOT t'.RITE IN THE AREA DESIGNATED "EVALUATION." • PROPOSAL. AND • • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (describe the proposed development—include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of it's scope and purpose): Build and operate a point of destination resort. (100 room hotel , full service restaurant, 18 hole golf course, pool/spa recreational facility, gas pump for resort vehicles and guests , helicopter pad, stables , indoor riding arena, cabins , managers residence, out buildings, barns , parking, pro shop, coffee shnp, landsr'aped grounds , paths for walking. and riding) Proposal will cover approximately • 280. acres. This resort will be operational year roimnd ; providing s-Prvice to ' tourists, fishermen. hen ers , rnnfcrPncec, families , and local population. • • t1 t • • PROPERTY AND AREA DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description Item F Address: • Legal (from property tax statement): • • ' Lot: Block: Subdivision: • • Tax Parcel: Quarter Sections: • Section: Township: Range: Tax Number: • Land Area (dimensions): Anderson Property - Apprx 200 acres/State Ladd Apprx 80 acres General (describe the Location, physical characteristics, and extent of Land area to be affected —include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of the property and it's envi- ronmenti: Subject property is located approximately 14 miles South of Forks , 1 mile West of 101 on Oil City Road. Land is generally flat on two plains ; pasture, alder bottom, and forest. Hoh River to South ` west, seasonal stream on west border. • SCHEDULE (identify beginning and ending dates of the proposal—include phasing): Golf Course - Greens to be planted upon approval of applicable agencies , completion date 6/89. Building Construction - Start Date 3/88 Completion Date 6/89. OVERALL PLAN (describe any plans for future additions, expansions, or related activities, or plans by others that may affect the proposal): Unkown . • REQUIRED APPROVALS (identify all Local, state, and federal approvals required for the completion of the proposal and if any approvals are pending that are related to the proposal): Jefferson County Planning, Health & Building Departments , Washington State Health Department, State Liquor Control Board, State Land Lease Application. ENVIf:ONmENTAL DATA (list any existing or proposed environmental information such as studies or documents related to the proposal): Unknown • • ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS EVALUATION • Agree Disagree Mitigate • EARTH 1. Check the item that describes the site: flat ❑ rolling ❑ hilly • ❑ steep slopes ❑ mountainous•ET'���olher—identify: 100 yr flood zone see Item E • • • • • EVALUATION • • Agree Disagree Mitigate 2. That is the steepest slope on the bite? Identify the approximate O. ❑ ❑ percent of the slope: Zero lope , generally flat on Lwo p airs . 3. Mat general types of soils are found on the site (1.e, sand, ❑ ❑ ❑ • gravel, peat, or muck)? If you know the classification of agri- cultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: See attached Forest Soil Summary 4. Are there surface indications or a history of unstable soils in El ❑ ❑ the immediate vicinity? If so, describe them: NO visible • indication of unstable soil - subject property -partially located in 100 yr flood zone. '"5: `_ •Describe the purpose, the type, and approximate quantities of any ❑ ❑ ❑ or grading proposed. Identify the source of the fill: Grading & fill required for golf course - fill to be elecL sand and gravel. Appropriate excavation for hi,lilding foundations , driveways and paths . • 6. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing; construction, or ❑ ❑ ❑ us e if sp generally de cribe it: Land to be left as natural as possible graded areas . to be planted with native plant life (grasses, trees & shrubbery) and surfaced with roc . & maintained. Do not anticipate erosion problem cue to a nve control measure s _ 7. , 'About what percent of the site would be covered with impervious ❑ ❑ ❑ surfaces after construction of the project (i.e. asphalt or buildings)? Less than 10% • 8. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts to the earth, if any: Planting of native plant • life .(see ##6) and rnrk surfacing on pathways and parking areas . AIR 9. V:hat types of,emissions to the air, if any, would result from the ❑ ❑ ❑ proposal. (i.e. dust, automobile odors, or industrial wood smoke) • during construction and when the project is completed? Generally emissionsg`c�uripngxcons`truction `dirt��'dustmfromrLads & heavy equipment exhaust. Resort operations- heating/cooling system exhaust, wood smoke , laundry, auto, kitchen, maintenance vehicles , golf carts exhaust 10. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may lJ ❑ ❑ affect your proposal? If so, generally describe them: NO 11. , Describe proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or ❑ ❑ ❑ of er impacts to the air, if any; Incorporate into overall plan regulations pertaining to emissions control . Exhaust systems designed by man l c ,r of kitchen appliances ; chimney ' s and combustion engines . • • • • • • • EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate • IVATER • • Sur fade Mater 12. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of ❑ ❑ , ❑ the site, including year-round or seasonal streama, salt waters, lakes, pon(:s, and wetlands? If yes, describe the type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: Hoh River runs through SW- corner of property. Wet spots in lower pastures , natural spring (well) and a a : - er appears to run off into Hoh River. ` 13. nut the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the ❑ ❑ ❑ described waters (within 200 feet)? If yes, describe the work and • .. attach- .a'avlat?le plans: No work will occur within 200! of the Ho River. Natural spring will be incorporated • into landscaping between main tgailding an-d restaurant. Wet spots will be avoided and remain natural ponds . Livestock barns will be located in the 100 yr flood zone • 14. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be ❑ ❑ ❑ placed or removed 'from the surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Identify the source of the fill material: No dredge material will be disturbed. . ' No fill will bbe emoved from or placed w'Ithi r.Eace • waters or wetlandds. Refer to site pLan Fm- flTl and . grading locations. 15. 1'JiL1 the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? ❑ ❑ ❑ Give a general description and identify the purpose and approximate quantities, if known: Surface waters to remain natural and undisturbed. 16. Does the proposal lie within a 100 year flood plain? If so, note ❑ ❑ ❑ the location on the site plan: Partial - see Flood •Zone Map :T7. "Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to ❑ ❑ • ❑ surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated , volume of discharge: Surface waters will not be disturbed. For discharge of waste material refer to septic plan. t 1- • Ground Neter • 18. I'U L ground water be withdrawn or will water be discharged to ❑ ❑ ❑ • ground water? ,Give a general description and identify the purpose -aid approx mate uantities, if known: Ground water to be with- . drawn through well for drinking and human uses , • • • • • • _ - • EVALUATION • ' • Agree Disagree Mitigate 19. Describe the waste material that would be discharged into the ❑ ❑ ❑ ground from septic tanks or other sources, •if any (i .e. domestic • sewage; industrial wastes, identifying the chemicals contained; and agricultural wastes). Describe the general size of the system; the number of such systems; the number of houses to be • served, if applicable; or` the number of animals or humans the • • system(s) is expected to serve: Waste - domestic sewage, restaurant waste, livestock waste , laundry, clorinated pnol - water. System will hp of required size by county and state health departments. System to serve maximum occupancy of 100 unit hotel , restaurant and all other on sight facilities. Water Run-off . r"•' - - (including storm water) 20.- Describe-the source of. run-off, including storm water. Describe ❑ ❑ ❑ • - the method of collection and disposal, if any, including any known quantities. Where will this water flow? WILL this water • flow into other waters? If so, describe it: Run off water will not be drastically altered. Present drainages Soil Summary, _ showing soil permeability. • 21. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, ❑ ❑ ❑ enerally des ribe .how: None anticipated for surface • . Maters. Septic waUte to be controlled by septic system. Other wastes will be contained and transported to appropriate_ dumping facility. ic : auto oil 22. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, ❑ ❑ ❑ and run-off iter.im acts„ if a • Surface and ground water will not "fie intentional ply dis Lurb hould not present a challenge a_ e ' : , es .- a- . . ' ' ty. See Forest Soil Summary. • • PLANTS 23. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ ❑ ❑ XDeciduous tree:X(alder XinapLe ❑ aspen ❑ other—identify: Evergreen tree:) fir tiaedar Cpine ❑ other—identify: ig(Shrubs Crass M Pasture . 'Crop or•grain 1".eta soil plants: ❑ cattailbuttercup ❑ buLlrush ❑ skunk cabbage ❑ other—identify: ❑ t'.ater plants: ❑ water lily ❑ celgrat-.;s ❑ milfoil 0 other—identify: None ❑ Other—identify: EVALUATION • ' Agree Disagree Mitigate • 24. ghat kind and amount .of vegetation would be removed or altered? ❑ ❑ ❑ Minimum number or trees , shrubs , grass to be removed for hnilidngs , roads, paths, golf course., helicopter • pad. Where feasible replanting will occur, atmosphere o proper y o remain essen is y natura an. rustic. 25. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the .❑ ❑ ❑ site: Unknown • 26. Describe proposed landscaping, use of nature plants, or other ❑ ❑ ❑ measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,- if any: Planting native grasses , local fruit trees , indigenious flowers and shrubs , deciduous trees , conifer trees. • ANIMALS • 27. Check any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the ❑ ❑ ❑ site or'are known to be on or near the site: EXBirds: €v8Xiawk ❑ heron 0-eagle daongbirds ❑ other—identify: Mammals: ❑ deer ❑ bear LKXLk ❑ beaver ❑ other—identify: Elk only mammal observed on property FLsh: ❑ bass fii'Xalmon kxtrout ❑ herring ❑ shellfish C ther—identify: steelhead 28. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the ❑ ❑ ❑ site: Unknown 29. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain how: ❑ ❑ ❑ Unknown 30. Describe proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if ❑ ❑ ❑ any: Keep property as close to natural state as possible in relationship to development. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 31, that kinds of energy (i.e. electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, ❑ ❑ ❑ • and solar) would be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it would be used for heating, manufactur- . ing, etc. : Electricity, wood burning, natural gas , generators , gasoline. Engery sources will be for • , - - - . - -- - , - _ , :: . i r power, automobile fuel . 32- t':ould the project affect the potential use of solar energy by ❑ 0 adjacent pro7erties, If so, generally describe the affect: No 1 33. that kinds of energy conservation features are included in the ❑ • ❑ ❑ plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be incorporated into building design to minimize energy waste. - • • • • • • • EVALUATION Agree• Disagree Mitigate ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 34. Are there any environmental health hazards,. including ,exposure to ❑ ❑ ❑ toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous - waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe the hazards: Gas pumps proper maintenance and satety practices. 35. Describe special emergency services that might be required: ❑ ❑ ❑ Fire systems and back up generators - 36.. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ health hazards, if any: Proper -maintenance and :safety practices - specific hazards unknown. NOISE • 37. I'.hat types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project ❑ ❑ ❑ . (i.e. traffic, equipment, and operations)? None • 38. Mat types and Levels of noise would be created by or assoicated ❑ ❑ ❑ with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (i.e. con- struction, traffic, and operation)? Indicate what hours noise Themporar during construction would come from the site: ea y eq ipment, t ul ing noises (hammers , saws , etc) workers vehicles. During operations; delivery vehicles , cu-s tuner traffic, maintenance equipment, livestock, people. Hours noise to be expected, reasonable daylight hours. 39. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if ❑ • ❑ ❑ any: These are normal noise levels , . no controls • seem necessary. LAND AND SHORELINE USE • • 40. Mat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? . ❑ ❑ ❑ Site: Rural/residential , hayfields , livestock commercial forest. Adjacent: Commercial fort lands , 1ng• ng, rpci donti al _ Tndilit-ri n1 chip and lumber mill within 1 . 5 miles 41. Has the .site been used for agriculture? If so, describe the use: ❑ ❑ ❑ . Yes ; grass hay crop 42. Describe any structures on the site: Family residence , ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 barns , sheds and out buildings. • • EVALUATION . . • • Agree Disagree Mitigate 43. Lill any structures be demolished? If so, what structures? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes, current structures to be replaced by new construction. 44. :.hat is the current comprehensive plan or community development .0 ❑ ❑ plan designation of the site? Identify the plan: Rural 45. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program ❑ ❑ ❑ designation of the site? Hoh River designated conservancy per Rachel Nathanson. 4t. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally ❑ ❑ ❑ sensitive" area? If so, specify the part: Unk.nOWn 47. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the ❑ ❑ ❑ completed project? 125 . i employees/maximum occupancy fcr hotel to be determined. 48. Approximately how many people would the completed project ❑ ❑ ❑ displace? None • 49.. Describe proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts, if any: None • 50. . Describe proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible ❑ ❑ ❑ with existing and projected Land uses and plans, if any: • Proposer to comply with county and state requirements. HOUSING • 51. • Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate ❑ ❑ ❑ whether the housing is high, middle, or low income: 1 private residence for manager and family. Dormitory type housing for employees (number of units to be determined) . • 52. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? ❑ ❑ ❑ Indicate whether the housing is high, middle, or Low income? None 53. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, ❑ ❑ ❑ if any: Not applicable. • • AESTHETICS 5.1. Mat is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),- not ❑ ❑ ❑ including antennas? ::hat is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Buildings to 3 stories , building exterior to be wood. • EVALUATION • • • Agree , Disagree Mitigate • •t 55. that views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or ❑ ❑ ❑ obstructed? None • 56. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, ❑ ❑ ❑ if any: Design of buildings and grounds to be compatible with surrounding land and area life style. LIGHT AND GLARE 57. ._Ithat type of Light or glare would the proposal produce? !That time ❑ ❑ ❑ of the day would it mainly occur? Outside building lights , lighted walkways , restaurant and hotel interior • ligJits , mainly occuring after sunset. 58. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard ❑ ❑ • ❑ or interfere with views? No 59. Chat existing off-site sources of Light or glare may affect your 13 ❑ O proposal? None • 60. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts, if any: Not applicable. • • RECREATION 61. !:hat designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the ❑ E] ; • ❑ immediate vicinity? Fishing, hunting, horseback riding, ' beach - combing, hiking, camping, sight seeing. 62. t:ouad the proposed project displace any existing recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ No uses? If so, describe the displacement: • 63. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on ❑ ❑ ❑ recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or proponent, if any: None • • • • • • EVALUATION • Agree. Disagree - Mitigate • HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION 64. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, ❑ ❑ ❑ state, or '.ocaL preservation registers known to be on or next to • • • the site? If so, generally describe them: Unknown 65. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, cultural, ❑ ❑ ❑ archaeological, or scientific importance known to be on or next to the site: None 66. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ❑ ❑ ❑ None • • TRANSPORTATION 67. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe ❑ ❑ ❑ the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the . site plan: 65. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the ❑ ❑ ❑ . approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No nearest step ] 4 miles in Forks , WA- 69. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project eliminate?Number of parking spaces to he determined by county,.. recommendations . Adequate space is available for all 70. :'all the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ to existing roads or streets, not- including driveways? I f so, R)bl 1 r^.. i,l'f�� r, 12.(14,y)nc` `1 '''1 r l fly lyli generally describe them, indicating whether they are public or �� (( private; Existing private roads on property will he r fir,irri 101 upgraded to handle additional traffic - grading , gravel , etc. additional private driveways will be '' ' ' e't''Y:-!'1 dCVC P, on property to al low for maintenance vehicles to -ft.r If pr,v. access property. t, r 4ri a:;:, I ,, , 1..1� (AY..( Mfr f " c 71. l'.ill the project use water, rail, or air transportation, or occur ❑ ❑ ❑ in the immediate vicinity of these facilities? If so, generally describe the use: Helicopter Landing Pad on Site . • . 72. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the com- ❑ ❑ ( ❑ I pleted project? If known; indicate when peak volumes would occur` ! ! 110 C f S0+ daily traffic would be spread through out diay.t., f:.1(F- 73. Peak iberarFbfa"sed mea'sur`es t9PSiP EPEr• control transportation ❑ ❑ ❑ impacts, if any: Reasonable daylight hour operations for helicopter landings . • • • • EVALUATION • • Agree Disagree Mitigate PUBLIC SERVICES .74. Mould the project result in an increased need for public services ❑ El • ❑ (i.e. fire protection, police protection, health care, and schools)? ' • • if so, generally describe the resuLts: Fire protection. 75. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on ❑ ❑ ❑ public services, if any: Fire system on site. • • • • UTILITIES 76. Check w'hich utilities are currently available at the site: ❑ water ❑ ❑ ❑ XXeLectricity.❑ natural gas ❑ refuse service telephone septic system ❑ sanitary sewerXXother— identify: gas pump and holding tank • • 77. Describe the utilities that are proposed for Ai penjiecholicling tQk. ❑ ❑ . utility providing the service, and the general construction activ- ities on the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be • needed: Electricity - _Clallam County PUD,. .Natural G.as - Doxol ; Telephone - Peninsula Telecom, Garbage r. Sanitary Landfill (facility garbage truck) , Gasoline - local delivery service . (to be selected at a later date) . ACKN0VJLEDGEMENT i acknowledge that all information provided in this checklist and all attached rnaterial is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand the Lead agency is relying on this informa- tion to make it's decision. In addition, I understand that review under SEPA does not constitute approval of a proposal; • compliance with Local, state, and federal regulations applicable to the proposal shall constitute approval. (Check with appropriate agencies to determine what approvals are required.) . SEPA approval is based on the information you provide. If found inaccurate, approval could be withdrawn.' 467 ,4z? ,/ , /,/ (proponen or authorize re resentative) Tdate • • tJ RECEIVED MAR 22 v9 Deanna D. Mueller Hoh River Development Jt FE ,^v °�k+' P r.;sir :. ,.•n� Rt 1 Box 137 Forks, WA 98331 February 22, 1988 Rachel Nathanson, Senior Planner Jefferson County Planning & Building Dept. P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms. Nathanson: This is in response to your letter dated November 5, 1987 regarding items to mitigate 1 - 4. 1. We agree to the proposed mitigation for light, glare and noise impact by establishing a 100 foot wide buffer of existing trees and vegetation along all property boundaries. 2. Proponent will dedicate 10 foot of right-of-way where subject property borders Oil City Road to the county. The proportionate share in the future improvements to Oil City Road and the approach to Oil City Road off Highway 101. Bob Nesbitt of the Jefferson County Public Works Dept. was contacted today 2/22/88 and will be sending someone out to review the subject areas and report back with their findings. 3. We understand if any substantial development is planned within 200 feet of the floodway of the Hoh River a shoreline substantial development permit approval is required. Floodway boundaries (currently undetermined) will be established at a later date. No development within the 200 foot zone is anticipated. 4. Proponent will supply reliable information as to the proper disposal of septic effluent and protection of the existing groundwater quality. We anticipate filing our binding site plan before June 1, 1988 and will be in contact with you soon. Please call me if you have any questions or information for us. Sinc ely, Deanna D. Mueller cc: Jefferson County Public Works Dept./Jefferson County Health Dept. 1 - #4 o --1 I a. a . il i IlLo Lt. • w 1 (63 , : zji •? ..- Ilhik, .- . .. . , 1 X 0 --.0 ,. x. rti ,, z , (A = -cl 31, _-_, , 5, -,--t-) " .■ i, z 1 '.41111.•, " . tiS:I I, i it . 10 al■._ \ t". , 1 ,,.., 4' ,,,,...i.,.: :‘,,311 -1-rrt„.„NA .„,,,,,„ . , Hell , • ....("Ii; 0 - crl °I 1 1) ....._. : — '..".. . r:''''Vr„ . ,43• it. ' ' •:" 0- t•$ vt" ''..; - :ii 111111111116 --—1? ' n r- - _____,- < , 4 I (71 . • , a---J RI ; ,E.--4 ,• R ..,..,,, -II t \ (' .\....,,_ .., 4 : , --_•______ . t : –,X....._0 0D c _. <-- i,‘1 P`'-3• ,. .' li Pm -o—-- ,q- )i * • \ ,To-‘ F o 0 • o0,10) >'. , 2 1 7<—,—;——— ZI, — •■1) E ._7 V — e- 2 N 1 RI °I ,.4 i • N 66' • • . 4 (1 , . .t., . A wrig I /Q Z2 . 1 il• K..... - , , D 1 ', 7: h- :rn tp. • i --- e ' ., ! . ,„__,,' V/ , 1 I .1.., • m--,/ . • • . II 1:3 CI OD ' ,,:) \ . , 0 u, , , ....),,k • . ....- , 0 pi - ' _ __, . f/ 7 ' \ ,i__ ___ ________ / • , —— — nr—— , . f/ • ?.,-. 1 / / ..... . 7 1, e Le, -10 t i R-1 §-'• \ . • ' , -71") , / . Ori / ' 1 'I ! in • I ,,,i•l • .t...6 \ N , r---.: I •"-. 0-1 \ — (fi ;• l' ' ; ?‹ ' -xi g , I _— czt... , crl . 0 . /1' ' 1 A, , i • E. ° g La , ......., , Q) ....., , , . s , )› . c., - . zn 1 , . R. - /, N . . o - I _e, 1 ; I I , Llifi I . 6 i • :, i 1 , : -r -- --. - rr • ' 4--.‘.... , I EccI: Fel■ice.., I; - ____ _ ___ -4-. 1 , 111111111.w. ( ) - (") 0- \ c, 0 0 ---0\ r■ (ri ....- N. c . % trt, , , N 11) Z — __ -- , N -,,, 0 '" —Nk/y /0/ .5 ,,,./ r NI .--,.- ,--... . - ' ,- .. , _ • -cri„..., -... -- -NJ ,.."' ■ : I : 4 , i`,. "a'. �4^'..♦ -e' r„i w`*,:`#� s��i �T.`ti•..'.;*".tgd ' t •.`',°.•�:.S 1!. � , "! '+♦��Vi:j ,f , 'q ' ? : I ,VN . � F`�UMBE ♦ i Y � �— SHEET T �GN i "° ' ,#EWASHINTO l A. 'R �COUNTY ARA, '( y, .'6<.„ 'a ..' 4: a s' ' r r k -a , teaJEFFERSON "i V - s i *>` 1 , Sto , --,.! '; 4,. • , "!' i ._.ter,' ; i k ' �,,, ......;,,itzt., �s �k, i ` .,.1. # .y � 1 w �` '� P r a a :P,:,... �w,..., 5, ` , . 5. �A 41-4.4',..1•4, * �' �'lT•„ ' .y Y t +t [ ��� ea, • " iT �� y►^ fi : 3 � � >.,�' Y• � O � '� ' � 4 ‘1!"5,14,;.. s `.,.,„..„.. ,.„..' � ..�tq_ � - • T a s � � Q. � w 4, - ` , ♦r .a a f, f .'�� 1 'p L _ ti• .' �.0 rt.,---„L'.N.,..4-1,0es,•Pii4,4kr '„,,7221144.,,_. :... . 1.4'-,,' '7*.k ,,,, , ,..,-,;z. IS � T .�r � ; ff � �` � _ � r,`' ri` t Sr ti i w''+',T ' _a , � '-...?..i41.: , `� { ��y S,` t , Y ry t. �'•, 5 f �� r �i• "' / tt v 1� : � "# ` h i � �` � iiNtik, 00,.� ♦ �:Af4 � ^ `� yj i, e,, . d`i. k: �� t a ti . , - . °4�.,:it.t,.4,Lit.g.� � g� j + • R f y t r+ . S. ivt f � ,, 4 a y<.�d `A T - ,, t`{ x f a �.� . . a � " 7 T 'f 1 * 3 i� i Z , * : `,k,,,,,,‘f, r �t fiR . r a x '- ' ': ..,"-� ; ` 4 F< ',, AY "'� P sr s � St ,'' f“;l e*...4" ; ! � + ►`t r 1e 4 °5f" . � i 3;,' \ ' �':l ' # ' t‘'`. ,t,-''. •*. ,;• *'' T t . t � x{ i 4. a s ; . ' Mw ♦ dK a pry 1,, '. , . 1 s ' ,+w1,, '!1 ta ♦ a „ � ,'k+ ,t Vi ° _ ,n� # f "7, Y � ; om fi a 's t `r s 4 , Y t 5,:,..„.. -,.,--:%.*:....,4-,,,-,.,..„,:1'2:,,,,,,,.----,''''. --;'-...'' .1"it'.., : ,'1-: � \ .h. . te . -'', • 147-1: ,� '9 •. s: 411114-'41141''''',o' ti.^� -. `'� 'akj,4a4.� .4-. . ', . '',.i . R + 1 s#a 'fi x''r ' „? s4,T . C ' ...]yi " �.A +»4 �,- f '', .--14.'..r.,1,r,* * y+ -Id**:.� � .y ` -4 ' f ; t 1 ,, twt � .-,.. .1 "` t T ,,: V d'''.• ' �."-;1'. t f.t *• tI♦t _i •`i ti fi ms,Tny4 'lti,. T ! x,.'' — '1, `i,;* f &�r ,, ' ( ' hi!` ,T�tiS 1, v'RA � 2 +t i11 r .t'* r�? a.� R � 1 3 . `' 'tt „ ''','-';4,- +� k y,g M f , .'x7 � " . *4 4,; t.. 1 w'': �4: 'di'''..r i sL T-4°'1 .t >Jt r-. - I IA 0 co 1 r.:. ..° co CD Ds Ds == a la e- Do 5 00x = b m �e co 5 a. 0 w o a •• a. o Po o .0 Cn C: a a m m P. a cry g k m F.co X 'f' O O � m0 0 „ 0 l❑3 �tt(p� �+ �Sa m co i+m y O m 0 00 Kam'. �' co ate--. 0 00 a e"* a CD CD m .0 .0.,m o° 0.cm 5-1 t4 0 tr° o Ds .1..», -.- a OS tOy g' O "� ''� q 0 rn m•N 5 W 'G p..v Oy CD Oq C n a° a - b 0 0 i o° 0 00 ..• ° a a a co Po H a °• c - ::.400W a!<40,4: 1.3,-T •aooE o5.co °Ac'"• Dma' �°.°"• 0 x to ▪ `° o Oro 0poCAp,0„ �c0oc = a.ro Eaa a. •a•Gb o �a •1 Do ° m er °.K ° PO CD��E a cD o m SO O Cr .y P m] m�n .n�' 0-•Po p,, 1 .1- el O -ter w 5.,?,"E U1 C/2 en co co or, g o0 • • m a e* al o � m b ..1 cm o a 5 17 ..-... r� �� a w d "+ ro om ti 0 od ga), 0 O � CD O . Ds 7 m� ? • a 0( Ds _ e- `< o a� 0O co E'n `r C a O a I 0 o-I oK a � .-0 °p..CD 0.C0`rD a=• co V O CD e•10.4 0:1C coo co CD 0-',.F., n Fr- 0CD ° y 0- A ko " 0 a O E5 .� '� co▪ -.,m m 0 0 � w G / o m s 0 .—Cr.00 • co 0- as CD C 0£0 e-r .r O 0 I �i -� Gem.o iUI VI O,� _�CD .0 er... •aE .rn..O,b ;A•,� O'C1oa 0CDm0 OcL, ma. 0 45 ° ° y H- -. o ••. 'j A W=CD W c0D .y C: Om0 Po 'F' o*0.: m0 .y � Omni co" »+ er 0 m'0 co 'cr'j A er O c.'7 c.�• .., 05..• g emO- cD y 0°P° 0 -. ,. 0 aE "uv C e+ r' J Pt cis •nrb .� o `5 n Oem.00NE OCODOOE cr'•.�° m °' om 'b 10 55.50 5' O• �0m `a.Eg .b�m b A .� a ea o � ao �o" aE° ao �5• a- °'m �,mma C07 .4-0.0 m a `/7-H,L f „I i l! - II, III. II tt`. f ,,E III, L�j��, 5 � et it 't' / /.. / / , ' CifJ rv/7�" f IL _ S���A„V./4� ` pl iii(e0 ../t44-Cke-,0 el e..-G. a-.4.-<-.0-tA....a...6 A/I.A.e-/____12€V-014144'7 iII f N li,1 i;offc ��_ S�-Q�` ��-e�.L I1 av cc- ■:II,, II''3 970 iy ,�C , �-�L �.o-7t.,.-1�Z) .. d I ;� C °- � gels III Gt> - . 3 7 C r I I i-Ze_- geCe0104 ' le/if.'4!3 ''''' IS61.-e-,..Ll4d V74,1 #4,tet/iot_ ae.C..f,t4,60,0#1...e....u.r--- .,„..,,,,,i ,v6-_s- ii- .44if IThT- ,vw ac: . ,,c „-e64,442 ,2 ...4 - ; t , } G I; i �I ��A.e-C a�iF a. Cf �t�-t,,�„�,e ,4 pro - oa!e-s a- 7� G . I j! 1'{F tli II G�°- _ z u-it. �� IIF ,26„..„(..„ ,, 11. IF{ Ili 1 ' L � .i . iI I , Imo. .- ..�,,� 1' FC1 Ili it {t 1!f I I il; � Ii ■ 11 i1 :,I I tl III III !'I III III ,I III id III iti I 1 II I {I iii i;! il PI 1, i {f 1 iii it' j II iti. lor D E ANNA MUELLER, RUTH X I NG , AND WAYNE JOHNSON ( LOWER IlOH R= VE R DEVELOPMENT ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BINDING SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is to develop 280 acres as a resort in the West End of Jefferson County. The resort's facilities would include a 100 room hotel, a full service restaurant, an 18 hole golf course, a pool and spa facility, a gas pump for resort and guest vehicles, a helicopter pad, horse stables, an indoor riding arena, cabins, a manager's residence, a barn, a pro shop, a coffee shop, parking areas, and paths for walking and horseback riding. The resort would be operational year round. The project would be located approximately one mile from Highway 101 on Oil City Road and adjacent to the Hoh River. It includes approximately 200 acres of private property described as the South Half of the Northwest Quarter and 80 acres of leased state land described as the North Half of the Northwest Quarter all within Section 4, Township 26 North, Range 12 West, WM. It includes Government Lots 1, 2 (less that portion north of the Hoh River Road) , 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 within Section 5, Township 26 North, Range 12 West, WM. FINDINGS 1. Review of the project was initiated with an environmental checklist as per the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21(c) . The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners remanded the project concept on September 21, 1987 to the Jefferson County Planning Commission to assist in the determination of the proposal's consistency with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is designated as resource production on the optimum land use map of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The following goals and policies of the comprehensive plan apply to the land use review: "Commercial Development" (Pages 38 and 39) , the goal and Policies 1 and 2. 3. The property to the west is residential. The surrounding property to the north, east, and south is timberland. 4. Notice of the public hearing scheduled for October 7, 1987 was made by publishing a legal notice in the September 23, 1987 edition of the Port Townsend Leader and notifying by mail the Jefferson County Public Works Department, the Jefferson County Health Department, and adjacent property owners. The hearing is held by the Jefferson County Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Jefferson County Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their public hearing on October 7, 1987. A letter of support dated October 3, 1987 from the Forks Chamber of Commerce and the West End Business and Professional Association was read to the commission. The letter based the support for the project on the job opportunities and tourist dollars it would generate. It also stated that the proposal would be a positive impact on the economically distressed area. Wayne Johnson spoke in favor of the proposal stating that a great deal of support has been generated. Bill Lewis, a realtor from Forks and a nearby resident to the project site, spoke in favor of the project. He stated that the facility would increase the tax base for the county without increasing the need for public services. Jerry Newland, an engineer from Northwest Territories, Inc. , stated that all the engineering work on the proposal would be done to meet county regulations and assured the commission that a professional approach to the project would be taken. 4 The planning commission reviewed the commercial policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and classified the proposal as a planned commercial development. The commission unanimously recommended that the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners find the proposal consistent with the Commercial Development Section, Policies 1 and 2 that deal with location, of the comprehensive plan. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RECOMIDATION The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners reviewed the proposal and the planning commission recommendation at their October 12, 1987 meeting. No one spoke on the issue of the proposal's consistency with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. By unanimous approval, the board concurred with the planning commission recommendation and determined that the proposal is consistent with the land use policies of the comprehensive plan. wed kf 4 1;74 " � ,.,-' " F -, ,r r }7 liti — 1111111hiS., .....0 -4, , ..,.. , !.. ,....,!...... . _,.:.-", "Cf 1. _ k. 1: _, i i . to: z �' x e— , 4 7t•C �� `' ; t { Q } .1..,*,- — - a.-t-r illo i5 }T� �� �p�// E. i #V : I �7•4 . .:„..: , ,; . , ,f � �.. � S� A �� '.fit 2 d.�. { + 4__.4...t ^r••'• t 1 t '. :} � ■ �R R . _3� j_ j F_ � _ ; t• . , q 3 F� r �\ `a.s .,:}. '; ,r.._:ak1-; t I ..y...` _4_.. ...- p.._.r.. .„...5.. L ... 1---,-7 f 4r 9 ! l _ #.. ' r r' _ r "5p-1 —,. t r r t - 3 , ,- R } 1 r ; a�rw�a�7.01,Wtr pia r € i--i-,-,!-1-"`" " I 1 w a ,• f ._ 1 f :Ir r ° .N t >• 6 Q, I I fi i s t—1.71 I 261 VV jj . pac r I r u � 1 I 1 h. E� ° 7:11-..-'!w 9 s 49WR l i-'+ L 1 v - y. nfi ut is :__: i ................,,__„,7: ' '....,..._..,.....„..„. ...: : - .S K -:._ P �. •� 7 1 4 s_ ... i�w r' " i. f a :1---1---ru':.;,.......-4-,-,1:-,---t.---7 7 ,- •, ''k .. a I �. e x 3 W� 1 s r R'�^�p� y�ty��.- iii E j 4 �1¢ y -r -t-'• -' • t_ } r" ytls,.MlIM�IO11l1lIY + �- I S 1 a Ili. L i. C x - !, ressmsG�..'"" ';-�^ 1._- .w�llMarw+91M € 1 }. ', ! `I' x tWnl.• _ T ,- f � 1 Ll���s f- r �+ r n � ] it 7 ! E 6 fi v ' rte.{ -L.;,...:4-,44J---1'..t.f 1'" : : &/ p I _ -V+ t } 3 �,� 1 f LiLsr1:! t P I..� . -,_, 4,r t i J_ - 1- 1 I f ,1...;.•• } .d r 1 �.._ - f. _ } �, t P-. { . ! a.-d t l .�.. } .1 v:I 1.. T X • !! r a € I. � r 6 €• 1[ f r , t 1 r p. t I 4 F 1 - i-.. t E. 1. e i i ... . ....i---, x 7 , - 1'=-^r•`sue M µ r � f';-;--4--44" � } a y ..s„ .... _ t �. �; i _,1.,, ;+ 1 n i. �. S _ } 5 N.1...I _ .�. - �� � 1 -�:-7 •-�-�- � ...'.4.- r� i'r { �-- ��:. r •�_�- - t' � -YF' �,- � 1g x yy $1P,..9 r 1 , I ;=*- ?,...._ ..y... _..y... .�..w.+'l ^} a I } 7:1----1-,--'''.7.'-'''!TS;.4h�-> � ,a t. 'a,"c«..'.,. t ; . I a •f• t ,_„„i„ 1 I r r :_.. I --,� ! .. } 7 1 1 € I j t '{ } �' . j`- t �;i (S. r." �, e 'i "�..- �,-...F. i� ..t > r','4y, i ! Ia. E 7— g 1-1,,y 1 } �C7� a w.. �: 1 4.i + �k i.S,t 7 F r r } 1.1-- r t� - V. ' ! .. t I . .„.,.,.........--i- 1 ; '•.; 'I, ; ._....,-,J.t--1--", : I ; , ---I,-..--- . 4- ; .•,..!-;',-.---*ITT- -' -'' 1 1;:riiipiel y } _'- F t -. r i . -' -_f,—,4—.4.-- --!'-' „4-1.,.,:4-,--t--,t1 1 l -t t '-,. . V t_t F€ ..� ! k t 1.--1 ' j r , '+f� t'' ;ai ,17-r. �^+."'f ---;.--11--s"-7 t '{_L...:,::,-;,.--'1-.4',F 'w�,- ,, 1 �- ; 1' -may :! 7--,-' T r { L #- -t N :4.-4.€ -t t- ', F T 1 I °k” i__'`-,';,4:_i___:.17.1.--,-1 ;.---., . 'f" a�rT ,, ' ^I ' -` r'r ...i -t -1--::._ �t -�... ,.„ +-. I^-: '-i__.T ,� .t9 a ! .�:, ;--s i-"7' t .'•'7""� �- 1:2:+...1'.7.-�'"" `'' , I j , c Imo( , j t t 1 day ..,..:..1:,;-..' J y - ', d y 1, a 1 t fir. 3 F- i . _1 , a ... - I - { t .-S: - �_; i 'c.• -'�...`� ,...,._i_.� ; t -- " --a-€ ±�4.--Y`•-'+ ';"^` 11..'-^. ,.3 ,{ . r € ^ir 3' i„.. r� 1 ,, y 9 1 P F " 7 1 ' _ r..•b. •„�_.. 3 -�'^r } f .,r ' --`.+y -.... .. .t. .„k s r . ?' _L..-.- I, . ! i d :a ..._...._.x...._ ._IV F' +- f i_,. ,.r.:.�'a1.. s -r'ti�y..0.. z _ ..,...,.1_ - -' = + fix' r ' � t y . M s� i- a „x .fit .;,,Y y` F ` n t .• C�*.i 1k1 T. `r. M1 r. ti4` e ,. a. fi is .. ,. .. . F• Y' p' . a ^�- a. ; R . Li t n 4. ,5.E , -. ',::'.:,.. .,;:::::'!"...,..,-"'..;'I'''':':;',-..,'.,„.. Y' t ' Y �� N v i{ p e { i . � r d., Ca d 5s i 5,} ^;y b�4 x i6 ..'.,;",t.;,'"':' + } v [ �, I a' f s Y • t� £• x q� 7 ,,,:,,).„.1,,,,,..‘,41,,I.., .. ry .� , .a 1.7--;:..i:--.':',1'.. „1,_4 . .._azu..�f:c sr..e.k......a'4......._'. r 1„_,,,_,u,i,.,i,,.,..',R_......x....s .� . ..,, ,l �.a.. ..,...... r ..........., .. ....�... �.. .....�.... ..,.. ,w.....,.s- ...4_�„}.. __. .._..e.._� „,, .,,r,-..,,,, ,,'.,1'',,,e,•i'i,,,,,,,.-` , , ,,,.,--.,-.-,,, - . #5 . _ b 0 . . eg C42 LI.; e%1 W ° Z m � � m isc E 3 f r Lia 8- 4 ,$ u.: . ' oo z ° oy n Z �. � '. � JQ7 t W = W Z c2 ~� J W y LU V A � z to W '� Z _ Z ''!W co_ d a' iii Li.ier fl 7 g W o Q F i�G W = W C) X t 3E 0 T — _ Z f.Lr 0 X 1 — a O era 't ce J S acl ag 0 W o+ W V 1 .eC w §— (. f • I . (.l! �r Y - n i I ., s, awr,a.. rr W.__r 1 * S I � I 1. � , I .l5,. t� 1 I Map • I j f• _ I I -- _ +a 'M Z 'E +t ¥ !�� I 'M£l •!r I/ 0�� RECEIVED JEFFERSON COUNT? Q P, 1 0 PLA0N|N(i 06FkGTSEqT i ; 'q KEY TO MA 500-Year Flood Boundary 100-Year Flood Boundary Zone Qesignations* 100-Year Flood Boundary 500-Year Flood Boundary Base Flood Elevation Line 4 With Elevation In Feet** Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within.Zone** Elevation Reference Mark RM7x Zone D Boundary ""-- > River Mile z ; •M1.5 **Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 *EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS _\ ZONE EXPLANATION A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. AO ' Areas of'100-year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three(3)feet;average depths of inundation are shown,but no flood hazard factors are determined. 9 AH Areas of 100-year shallow flooding when; depths are between one (1) and three (3) feet;base flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. A1-A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. B, Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500- ——--————-- ing with average depths less than one(1)foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile;or areas protected by levees from the base flood. (Medium shading) C , Areas of minimal flooding.(No shading) D Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. V Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. 16 V1-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. NOTES TO USER Certain areas not in the special flood hazard areas(zones A and V) may be protected by flood control structures. This map is for flood insurance purposes only;it does not neces- -- sarily show all areas subject to flooding in the community or all planimetric.features outside special flood hazard areas. For ad'joining toata panels, see separately printed Index To Map 2 k - Panels. �� UPPER HOH VALLEY ROAD • INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: 2 1 JUNE 21,1977 `/ FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE: JULY 19,1982 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS: o , 0 0 ZONE A w 28 `d `o k HOH RIVER", F? C "! 7 JEFFERSON COUNT( SFP 1 0 PLANNING DEPART.'IENT jet_cer)-L Pr ert C hers - L.,Q er- Qh CD co 12 0,43 00 l RcxLior)I er T rnber la,r i i i0 100 c/b an ier Fares+ Rem a uca.m 98 550 Q:. co c z c? 41 c)0 1 Us __o-4 A 0N.- [.Tc3OOO e_: 1_2. Q 5 4.0 02.. 1 L)Cu)lcee .r C� v ca (!!©tp. Q : C i.zo 4oa1 I ( L ( 000 - Same a d_ C012. 05300 ( John 0-a, es. ". .m_a 5 00 R 3 Box 37301 Fcsr(cs 96331 C) co r . aSHOc)z ri) tt,_t,oLoo0 - 3a rn e- cLis. 1101 C). .. 0012. 05 .zool Z-R g o t o: m er i O. 4 . os „Qo .. •e`fPerso _Cc o nt..y J2FF2' 0O C) 12.3 2 20o CO RA.Y0 1 o O - 3e Q `-112_3.23000 0 (NI R.. � . 1� S_AT' 4Sc 7 1 333OO l CickfDp CL-PP 1000 _ cio '; •.1_ an av Baawan vea.-t1-�e_ 9 8tOI_ .. ,2333 _. - c, _Lf4_t _Loo - 3ame- cis C3).. 712..33300.2-- - R0cic Jetl Ft e±cher FL E,177 ri5OO PO E5o 41 F5r1c5 % 331 lU (t iT 3 CX7 l __. _ _ .. (.Q 1Z0 t I OCR ,. d:)OnotJd Cues-f-er t.nol _. t T O .0 at 43 L,6 44' 8fi j PA.. (Q_3 a05 1.00 - `Theod o Da �' ` in 0A / 44. 31-100 P6 Sox t 5 1 8} t, s-r 300 0 - Sce rS ORO C8 (.Q i2.1c,.)1-1 ()OH. b 2l N- .I c ()O 15 4 R .l n i e,st-m. -t , PT. 1q3 ( R d, C . cs2 zOL4 4 Oc)Q STAT 41500 r27 k,� 12 4.3 : • v 61 2051 bO-f C) #7 T2.49 15 _ __ Ta>c 1 - (o/.204/ 1003 W To a-- (al toy 1 00 1'l �° S eG (01 toy y 000 to i_ 1 .J .,4\ I %, -2 i C\1 31.3.?.., - as. - 3 i I ---� -.16 15 3,3�, RAYONIER,I c RAYON E. NC i SGHdOL ,III} / \J LAN b 41 A D 37 2 ` C]_ 40 _ c 0 1 J ' 2 - RA,' n ER ,VC STAN • I ,, 3,,•21 Po�:2 "Ae ^ �► STATE r `� 3757 r' Ri STATE I STATE RAYCNIER,ANC. STATE RAYorni ER,[NC b , 17 7t1 , r I 3,.88r r /! I 38.071 I 35,25) S TAT E. I RAY' -n ER, INC �' STATE 31126 1 RAYONIER, INC. S i I r %- i c.A�4 36.851 Ilk ` 4I Nt L 1 ' q 3 ` —b 3844 I r `q 45 `� i 2944 ze.so i 15902. r • 38.\1 /122.00 WAU 'ey3790 � �6''i Vik,' 1 } + i' s •+ PhD ALL€N LOGG. —..2....' _'1*-�� = RA'roNiER,INC. ,ry� l 38.93f'ii%' ura`•�� 712323c 0 I0'., 38.10 _.Aet IF ►2 — a 31 ,- 39.20` STATE \ STATE " 232 i,` aaa5 Pu�E�N L 14 -v. 2COI ®2ob� G L A P , �� ,205 61 a�'∎�'12333 1.1'1.4. 4 s p; 1,'a�► �1.►,?123 83003 61,. i 99.�I ae j I ea a 4e ■7�' n; I_.404 $2" 252e � 40;3 4o.'3,1 4r,.3 RAIfOrIER,I INC, ai'C EAR/, INC ' , 1 MI LW KEE 5 -- f l' �AAPF9 ITT 9.30 � .` 1..... /i 3480 I y , 36 S4 CO. 4..,...r. A Q I, .- •-........_...... .......)4/ 6c • CWAUK E801 ''RI)r,20\�i 1 x..29.3 I 3090 ,7:384c t M.ID, R YONtER,IN•, �'AN• C:OI + t `� i9.40 S '1 / �, .' �..� �,+�� JA_M�•'!=.��'}1Li*-, limit ". -i IS�,a i/r RfiYONIER INC . CO dip."�I)�' , _ , ( "- . 38.90 i Ho : ' 3F 20 3,~►' - 19 • -AYOn.ER, ANC. ",T Low. - Hoh `�= .� o.o= ILYV' Are Camp E.LSSZS ,�i6_ 38�6c r- 1�1 26s Co, 2C>41(X0 (ot2d-13061 f .... S[i., t�, U S• �� ©P.P,YgNrER Cj �• ®, / 6 ! RAYON ER, InG. ��gt 24. 90 q • � V 7! U 5 Y• •■7 2510 39.95 �E �l i //� 35 ' \ U,5. �\N...' MIL��*. /38.4' _ .� ► 1 y • N: '• w LAND CO. I n . 2'� RAYONIE �` cO90 PrYOni!EP, INC Z .12' 121 PP W \ ie•esI I-b,,- EZ�, Nc.—` ' MtLWAUKE W ._.—. Qr 1 ` y,� �, 38. 6 i �� :::� / — �^y` MILWAUKEE .-I dAyo,41 c R, Inc 1 r 3e.0i3 I \ ( 1`.` • #1 • • r . RECEIVED JEFFERSON COUNTY JEFFERSON COUNTY FP C 6 ENV I RONMENTAL CHECKL I ST _ PL NNi,4, • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCV 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal; reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done; and help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. PROPONENT; Deanna D. Mueller Ruth King/Wayne E. Johnson ADDPESS: Rt 1 , Box 137 Forks , WA 98331/3047 - 24th W #6 Seattle, WA 98199 TELEPHONE: mom �x(206) 374-9185 ( XK (206) 281-9549 AUTIICRI ZED'REPRESENTATIVE. (contact): ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (home} (business) • DIRECTIONS This checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The questions apply to the entire proposal, including those phased over a period of time or on separate parcels of Land. • Answer each question accurately and completely to avoid unnecessary delays in processing this checklist. If you do not know an answer, write "unknown", or if a question does not apply, write "not applicable." Answers to some questions may require special expertise or technical assistance from qualified persons. The cost of obtaining such information is the responsibility of the proponent. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, Leases, permits, etc. ) that may further describe the proposal or be required by Jefferson County. Contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department for assistance in completing the checklist and for information on the administrative procedures required for it's processing. PLEASE PRINT IN BLACK OR BLUE INK OR TYPE EACH ANSI'ER, CO NOT WRITE IN THE AREA DESIGNATED "EVALUATION." PROPOSAL- AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION (describe the proposed development—include all factors that wilt give an accurate understanding of it's scope and purpose): Build and operate a point of destination resort. (100 room hotel , full service restaurant, 18 hole golf course, pool/spa recreational facility, gas pump for resort vehicles and guests , helicopter pad, stables, indoor riding arena, cabins , managers residence; out buildings , barns , parking, pro shop, coffee shop, lancaped grounds , paths for walking and riding) Proposal will cover approximately 280 acres. This resort will be operati.na _ •74 -1 • • .e..:- 'ce to • tourists, fishermen, hunters , c'crnfprenees, families, and local population. • • • . PROPERTY AND AREA DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description Item F - Address: p Legal (from property tax statement): .5*-- b� 'uW Qr 1N G y 1.1`b GzcAh- (-491-.5 (,L,S/6/7 O /ENU /kr 55 ��` o17,041"vE notJ Qv-r- (..-CTS I, z L�/Iet ,carat • Lot: Block: SL�gi.v4s�on: ; 'Al, e)CC T ,o r ro4=-ci.) D4' exv. oT z Loyc�E p-ra '7 t t 44Y; ,44-4- in/ • Tax Parcel: (p ()yahoo Quarter Sections: -TcWQ51((P 1.4 N lark rJa•E IZ tn..)/ k, h1, (etQ OS1OO )OO 3 • Section: Township: Range: Tax Number: • Land Area (dimensions): Anderson Property - Apprx 200 acres/State Land Apprx 80 acres General (describe the Location, physical characteristics, and extent of Land area to be affected —include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of the property and it's envi- ronment): Subject property is located approximately 14 miles South of Forks , 1 mile West of 101 on Oil City Road. Land is generally fiat on two plains ; pasture, alder bottom, and forest. Hoh River to South west, seasonal stream on west border. SCHEDULE (identify beginning and ending dates of the proposal—include phasing): Golf Course Greens to be planted upon approval of applicable agencies , completion date 6/89. Building Construction Start Date 3/88 Completion Date 6/89. OVERALL PLAN (describe any plans for future additions, expansions, or related activities, or plans by others that may affect the proposal): (Jnkown REQUIRED APPROVALS (identify all Local, state, and federal approvals required for the completion of the proposal and if any approvals are pending that are related to the proposal): Jefferson County Planning, Health & Building Departments , Washington State Health Department, State Liquor Control Board, State Land Lease Application. �. •2w.D� k}-S-DoT -S(6J MPP1OiAl.- ENVI1ON'IENTAL DATA (List any existing or proposed environmental information such as studies or documents related to the proposal): Unknown ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate EARTH 1. Check the item that describes the site: flat ❑rolling ❑ hilly 0 steep slopes 0 mountainousUother—identify: 100 yr flood zone see Item E - • • • EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate • 2. that is the steepest slope on the site? Identify the approximate ❑ ❑ 0 percent of the slope: Zero slope, generally flat on two plains. 3. that general types of soils are found on the site (i.e.- sand, ' ❑ ❑ ❑ gravel, peat, or muck)? If you know the classification of agri- cultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: See attached Forest Soil Summary 4. Are there surface indications or a history of unstable soils in U ❑ ❑ the immediate vicinity? If so, describe them: No visible indication of unstable soil - subject property partially located in 100 yr flood zone. 'S. Describe the purpose, the type, and approximate quantities of any ❑ ❑ ❑ foiling or grading proposed. Identify the source of the fill: grading & fill required for golf course - fill to be 5elecL 3aiid and gravel . Appropriate excavation • 6. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing; construction, or ❑ ❑ ❑, use? I f sp enerally describe it: Land to. be left as natural as possible graded areas to be planted with native plant life (grasses , trees & shrubbery) and surfaced with. roc . & maintained. Do not anticipate erosion pro p1'pm rip to a nvP Pnntrni mPAU.11-PG, 7. -About what percent of the site would be covered with impervious ❑ ❑ - ❑ surfaces after construction of the project (i.e. asphalt or buildings)? Less than 10% 8. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other ❑ 0 ❑ impacts to the earth, if any: Planting of native plant lif- . . . . . _ and parking areas. AIR • 9. Mat types of emissions to the air, if any, would result from the ❑ ❑ ❑ proposal (i.e. dust, automobile odors, or industrial wood smoke) - during construction and when the project is completed? Generally describe.and give approximate quantitLes, i know Temporary emissions during construction dfirtfdus't pfrom roads heating/cooling system exhaust, wood smoke, laundry, auto, kitchen, maintenance vehicles , golf carts L1 haust 10. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may ❑ ❑ affect your proposal? If so, generally describe them: NO 11. , Describe proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or ❑ ❑ ❑ other impacts to the air, if any. Incorporate into overall -Pian• regulations pertaining to emissions control . exhaust systems designed by manufacture of kitchen appliances ; chimney' s and combustion engines. F • • .. EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate WATER Surfade Water 12. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of ❑ E ❑ the site, including year-round or seasonal streama, salt waters, Lakes, ponds, and wetlands? If yes, describe the type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: Hoh River runs through SW corner of property. Wet spots in lower pastures , natural spring (well) and stream bordering west side of property. All wiper appears to run off into Hoh River. 13. P:LLL the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the ❑ ❑ ❑ described waters (within 200 feet)? If yes, describe the work and atta Hoh River.plans: No work will occur within 200' of the h River. Natural spring will be incorporated into landscaping between main building and reetaurant. Wet spots will be avoided and remain natural ponds. Livestock barns will be located in the 100 yr flood zone 14. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be ❑ ❑ ❑ placed or removed from the surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Identify the source of the fill material: No dredge material will be disturbed. ' No fill will bbe emoved tram or placed faithi surface waters or wetlands. Refer to site plan for till and . grading locations. 1S. ' IliLL the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? ❑ ❑ ❑ Give a general. description and identify the purpose and approximate quantities,es, Lf known: Surface waters to remain natural and undisturbed. 16. Does the proposal Lie within a 100 year flood plain? If so, note ❑ ❑ 0 the location on the site plan: Partial see Flood .Zone Map 17. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to ❑ ❑ + ❑ surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge; Surface waters will not be disturbed. For discharge of waste material refer to septic plan. Ground Water 18. Will ground water be withdrawn or will water be discharged to ❑ ❑ ❑ e ground water? Give a general description and identify the purpose a d approximate uantities, if known: Ground water to be with- crrawn through well for drinking and human uses septic and drain field system for waste disposal • i EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate 19. Describe the waste material. that would be discharged into the ❑ ❑ ❑ ground from septic tanks or other sources, 'if any (i .e. domestic sewage; industrial wastes, identifying the chemicals contained; and agricultural wastes) . Describe the general size of the system; the number of such systems; the number of houses to be served, if applicable; or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is expected to serve: Waste - domestic sewage, restaurant waste, livestock waste, laundry, clorinated pnnl water_ SyRtem will he of required size by county and state health departments. System to serve maximum occupancy of 100 unit hotel , restaurant and all other on sight facilities. Water Run-off (includL.ng storm water) 20. Describe--the source of run-off, including storm water. Describe ❑ ❑ ❑ the method of collection and disposal, if any, including any • known quantities. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe it: Run off water will not be drastically altered. Present drainages Soil Summary, showing soil permeability. 21. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, ❑ ❑ ❑ enerally describe .how: None anticipated for surface • eaters. Septic waste to be controlled by septic system. Other wastes will be contained and transported to appropriate- dumping facility. ic: auto oil 22. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, ❑ ❑ ❑ and run off ter im acts„ if am: Surface and ground water will not '"te intentionally disturbed. Run off should not present a challenge as high soil permeability. See Forest Soil Summary. PLANTS 23. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ ❑ ❑ tg(Deciduous tree:XXalder Xmaple ❑ aspen ❑ other—identify: Evergreen tree:)fir ai)edar)pLne ❑ other—identify: ig(Shrubs Crass Pasture Crop or grain EgKr:et 'sbil. plants: ❑ cattaiLXXbuttercup ❑ bullrush ❑ skunk cabbage ❑ other—identify: ❑ Water plants: ❑ water Lily ❑ eelgrass ❑ milfoiL O other—identify: None ❑ Other—identify: 1110 • EVALUATION Agree Disagree Mitigate • 24. ghat kind and mount f vegetation would be removed or altered? ❑ ❑ ❑ Minimum number or trees , shrubs , grass to be removed f• • • • • • • •— • •- • ' • • ' ester pad. Where feasible replanting will occur, atmosphere of property to remain essentially natural and rustic . 25. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the -❑ ❑ ❑ site: Unknown 26. Describe proposed Landscaping, use of nature plants, or other ❑ ❑ ❑ measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Planting native grasses , local fruit trees , indigenious flowers and shrubs , deciduous trees, conifer trees . ANIMALS 27. Check any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the ❑ ❑ ❑ site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Wxhawk ❑ heron D eagle a(Xongbirds ❑ other—identify: Mammals: ❑ deer ❑ bear E(YLk ❑ beaver ❑ other—identify: Elk only mammal observed on property Fish: ❑ bass XaLmon Nxtrout ❑ herring ❑ shellfish ether—identify: steelhead 28. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the ❑ ❑ El site: Unknown 29. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain how: ❑ ❑ ❑ Unknown 30. Describe proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if ❑ ❑ ❑ any: Keep property as close to natural state as possible in relationship to development. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 31. Mat kinds of energy (i.e. electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, ❑ ❑ ❑ and solar) would be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it would be used for heating, manufactur- ing, etc. : Electricity, wood-burning, natural gas , generators , gasoline. Engery sources will be for power, automobile fuel . 32. t':ould the project affect the potential use of solar energy by ❑ Q ❑ adjacent properties, If so, generally describe the affect: No d• 33. ghat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the ❑ ❑ ❑ -plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be incorporated into builddlng design to minimize energy waste. • • • EVALUATION Agree, Disagree Mitigate ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 34. Are there any environmental health hazards, including .exposure to ❑ ❑ ❑ toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe the hazards: Gas pumps - proper maintenance and satety practices. 35. Describe special emergency services that might be required: ❑ ❑ ❑ Fire systems and back up generators 36.- Describe proposed measures to reduce or control environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ health hazards, if any: Proper .maintenance and safety practices - specific hazards unknown. NOISE 37. '.hat types of noise exist in-the area that may affect your project ❑ ❑ ❑ . (i.e. traffic, equipment, and operations)? None 38. that types and Levels of noise would be created by or assoicated ❑ ❑ ❑ with the project on a short-term or a Long-term basis (i.e. con- struction, traffic, and operation)? Indicate what hours noise ' emporaryuduring construction would come from the site: heavy equipment, Dul ing noises (hammers , saws , etc) workers vehicles. During ea - : - - , • _ - , . _ • - maintenance equipment, livestock, people. Hours noise to be expected, reasonable daylight hours. 39. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if ❑ ❑ ❑ any: These are normal noise levels , no controls seem necessary. LAND AND SHORELINE USE 40. that is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ❑ ❑ ❑ Site: Rural/residential , hayfields , livestock commereia_l forest. Adjacent: Commercial forest lancls, logging, rPgidPnt-ial _ Tndustrial (-hie and lumber mill within 1 .5 miles 41. Has the_site been used for agriculture? If so, describe the use: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes;' grass hay crop • 42. Describe any structures on the site Family residence, 0 ❑ ❑ 3 barns , sheds and out buildings. • • . EVALUATION . Agree Disagree Mitigate 43. fall any structures be demolished? If so, what structures? E3 ❑ ❑ Yes, current structures to be replaced by new construction. . 40 :'.hat is the current comprehensive plan or community development -0 ❑ ❑ plan designation of the site? Identify the plan: Rural 45. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program ❑ ❑ ❑ designation of the site? Hoh River designated conservancy per Rachel Nathanson. 46. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally ❑ ❑ ❑ sensitive" area? If so, specify the part: Unknown 47. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the ❑ ❑ ❑ completed project? 125 i -employees/maximum occupancy for hotel- -to be determined. 48. Approximately how many people would the completed project ❑ 0 ❑ displace? None 49. Describe proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement 0 ❑ ❑ impacts, if any: None • 50. _ Describe proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible ❑ ❑ ❑ with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposaf to comply with county and state requirements. HOUSING 31. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate ❑ ❑ ❑ ' whether the housing is high, middle, or Low income: 1 private residence for manager and family. Dormitory type housing for employees. (number of units to be determined) . 52. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? C3 ❑ ❑ Indicate whether the housing is high, middle, or Low income? None 53. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, ❑ ❑ ❑ if any: Not applicable. • AESTHETICS S4.. that is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s); not ❑ ❑ ❑ including antennas? ?:hat is the principal exterior building l material(s) proposed? Buildings to 3 stories , building exterior to be wood. - • • EVALUATION • • Agree . Disagree Mitigate 55. that views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or ❑ ❑ ❑ obstructed? None • 56. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, ❑ ❑ ❑ if any: Design of buildings and grounds to be compatible with surrounding land and area life style, LIGHT AND CLARE $7. Mat type of Light or glare would the proposal produce? Rhat time ❑ ❑ ❑ of the day would it mainly occur? Outside building lights , lighted walkways ,- restaurant and hotel interior • lights , mainly occuring after sunset. 58. Could Light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard ❑ ❑ ❑ or interfere with views? No 59. that existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your ❑ ❑ ❑ proposal? None 60. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control Light and glare ❑ C3 ❑ impacts, if any Not applicable. RECREATION 61. Ihat designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the ❑ ❑ ❑ immediate vicinity? Fishing, hunting, horseback riding, beach combing, hiking, camping, sight seeing. 62. I:ould the proposed project displace any existing recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ No uses? If so, describe the displacement: A 63. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on ❑ ❑ ❑ recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or proponent, if any None • • .. • EVALUATION Agree. Disagree Mitigate ' HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESEI?VATION 64. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, ❑ ❑ ❑ state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe them: Unknown 65. Generally describe any Landmarks or evidence of historic, cultural, ❑ ❑ ❑ archaeological, or scientific importance known to be on or next to the site: None 66. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ❑ ❑ ❑ - None • TRANSPORTATION 67. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe ❑ ❑ ❑ the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the - site plan: • See site plan and area map. 63. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the ❑ ❑ ❑ approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No nearest stop ] 4 mites in Forks , WA, 69. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project eliminate?Number of parking spaces to be determined by county recommendations . Adequate space is available for all parking needs. 70. tilt the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements 0 ❑ ❑ to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe them, indicating whether they are public or private; Existing private roads on property will he upgraded to handle additional traffic grading, gravel , etc. additional private driveways will be o. I - . . • - ' . access property. 71. t'.ill the project use water, rail, or air transportation, or occur ❑ ❑ ❑ in the immediate vicinity of these facilities? If so, generally describe the use: Helicopter Landing Pad on Site. 72. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the com- ❑ ❑ ❑ pleted project? If known; indicate when peak volumes would occur: 50+ daily traffic would he spread through out-d.ay. 73. PIDeeackribte pr pt�'scdARrs��es toPdtPJ control transportation ❑ '0 ❑ impacts, if any: Reasonable daylight hour operations for helicopter landings . EVALUATION • Agree Disagree Mitigate PUBLIC SERVICES 74. IRould the project result in an increased need for public services ❑ 0 ❑ (i.e. fire protection, police protection, health care, and schools)? If so, generally describe the results: Fire protection. 75. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on ❑ ❑ ❑ public services, if any: Fire system on site. UTILITIES 76. Check which utilities are currently available at the site: ❑ water ❑ ❑ ❑ . Uelectricity.❑ natural gas ❑ refuse serviceNdtelephonelgseptic system ❑ sanitary sewerXLXother=-identify: gas pump and holding tank ' . 77. Describe the utilities that are proposed for AieARJ1ectTlAing taik. ❑ ❑ utility providing the service, and the general construction activ- ities on the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be • . needed: Electricity - .Clallam County PUD, .Natural Gas - Doxol; Telephone - Peninsula Telecom, Garbage Sanitary Landfill (facility garbage truck) , Gasoline - local delivery service ; (to be selected at a later date) . ACKNOG"1LEDGEMENT I acknowledge that all information provided in this checklist and aLL attached material is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is relying on this informa- tion to make its decision. In addition, I understand that review under SEPA does not constitute approval of a proposal; compliance with Local, state, and federal regulations applicable to the proposal shall constitute approval. (Check with appropriate agencies to determine what approvals are required. ) SEPA approval is based on the information you provide.. If found inaccurate, approval could be withdrawn. proponen or authorize• re•resentative date • • Affidavit publication ,, ,,, -,,,,,,, � 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON y ri:;!' ,` " COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) ss 4. FRANK W.GARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher of '. '; the Port Townsend Leader, a weekly newspaper which has ` E ., been established, published in the English language and cir- culated continuously as a weekly newspaper in the town of 4,7 di- '4 "` ~ri 0 Port Townsend,in said County and State,and for general cir- ,�0 f. ,, culation in said county for more than six(6)months prior to the W -' -.* date of the first publication of the Notice hereto attached,and I ` Y o- 'Z that the said Port Townsend Leader was on the 27th day of "y June 1941, approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior a fi Court of said Jefferson County,and that annexed is true copy 11 of the go ;:��. Notice of Public Hearing $4� Jefferson County Comprehensive W+ 0, `, k kr E t Plan motiBinding site plan review > 4 Deanna D. Mueller, Ruth King, ' + ho will Wayne E. Johnson it ., ., 19+*` w4 be co - sot conultieaiin's r r Lower Hoh River Development on sue,,, °'� _ R, lathe 0 ' i, ' thit i retort �- 1te -oom ;x et 4t . a, .tour ! 0 �- stt, ::»krly +' r`+, '" �lL' as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper a itself and not in a supplement thereof for a period of ; le lie u o -propowf denehipeenot one _consecutive weeks, beginning on the L .MOy 0 avini4 �,ib , '4; the. 23rd _day of September , 19 87 , - , ,..,7% '",':-.,L- ,'" rc.ra' �o11nin;'1 and ending on the 23rd_day of September t 1987 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed .. � * + ^' to its subscribers during all of this period. That the full IsOtill*it fiat*pathsJ from tip - amount of 54 9• 0 0 has been p.i.in full,at the I$ Is : op. buildi ,, t rate of 54.00 per c m inch for each irt�serti ' CJ! +� ; It irk. - << �_, 9-23 v d• --- 2 3rd day Subscribed and sworn to More me this da of south io of the . . tom. September 19-8-7-- 1 Aer ,/ ' , , ,i1,,f ay _ , Notary Public in and for the State of ashington, residing at Port Townsend 411 111 Deanna D. Mueller Lower Hoh River Development Rt 1 , Box 137 Forks , WA 98331 (206) 374-9185 September 7, 1987 Rachel Nathanson Jefferson County Planning Department P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms. Nathanson: Enclosed please find the following for your review and consideration: 1. Environmental Checklist 2. Binding Site Plan Checklist 3. Response to Binding Site Plan Checklist 4. Site Plan , 5. 100 Year Flood Zone Map 6. Legal Descriptions (Anderson Property, State Lease) 7. Area Location Map 8. Forest Soil Summary 9. Aerial Photograph Please contact me with questions or additional information you may require at (206) 374-9185 . Thank you for your time , I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, L///t/Adegka:____ Deanna D. Mueller Project Manager #2 BINDING SITE PLAN When necessary to facilitate review, the proponent of a commercial project may be required to submit a detailed site plan. The plan shall be no larger than 81/2" by 14" and shall be of suitable quality for reproduction purposes. The plan shall be drawn to scale and shall clearly identify the following features: 1. Project proponent's name; 2. Project' s name; 3. Legal description of property (Section, Township, and Range); 4. North arrow; S. Scale; 6. A vicinity map drawn in one corner showing the location of the site and its relationship to surrounding areas and geographical features, (i.e. roads, community, water body, etc.) ; 7. Location and length of property boundaries; 8. Location and width of existing and proposed access points (label as existing and proposed) ; 9. Label immediate surrounding land uses (i.e. residential, commercial, etc.); 10. Location and dimensions of all buildings; 11. Distance from buildings to property boundaries; 12. Location of all doorways for buildings; 13. Location of parking stalls; • 14. Location of septic tank drainfield system (label as existing or proposed) ; 15. Location of well (label as existing or proposed) ; 16. Identify any easements affecting the property; 17. Location and description of landscaping; Gi/91 4-/^16-6 ,z '1 WiZ7-r/5 ,co 2 •9Ny PeoPo.SEA .ZoAD. /9. Phi g r I e e 5 5a cN,9 5 .ucc S, lowirmAnibmg., $oDdG`S' UA" cc1•97e2 , a.e q/..✓r9�L. f6.9Trr.��s 2(:)- GOGA TiONS o, &A/67/416 AND P' OP05 6 p S/6.4v S .-- 2/. Loa 9 7 i o.v .0,-,/#9,-/z/c AP A cc6 //17,9,2 /AJF 22 • 40‘.../3,7-/b oti of • ,7714 r,4`5 6-'x1sT/.v6- 1 Pe_opoS6-0 #3 4 Response to Binding Site Plan Checklist: 1 . Deanna D. Mueller/Ruth King Rt 1 Box 137 Forks , WA 98331 (206) 374-9185 Wayne Johnson 3045 - 24th W #6 Seattle, WA 98199 (206) 281-9549 2. Lower Hoh River Development 3 . See :Btu 4. See Site Plan 5. 1" = 800 ' 6 . See 7 7 . See Site Plan 8. See Site Plan 9 . See Site Plan 10. For general location of buildings see site plan. Actual building dimensions to be set when plans are drawn by architect, (approximate size on site plan) . 11 . See Site Plan 12. Building plans to be completed upon approval of overall proposal by lead agency. 13. See Site Plan 14. General area for septic system on site plan. Ray Franklin from Clallam County Health Dept. (under contract with Jefferson County Health Dept) to inspect site 9/14/87 or 9/21/87 and make recommendations. 15 . Sw n ce Se..t, G4,5 440--et.0.--hal ' P.c na. a 16 . Non exclusive easement read to State of Washington across NE border and through state lease land. 17. Landscaping to natural and rustic with riding and walking paths throughout; planting of native grasses , local fruit trees , indigenious flowers & shrubs , deciduous trees , & conifer trees . 1 4 i i Response to Binding Site Plan Checklist Continued: Page Two 18. Not applicable 19. See site plan for fences and water bodies . Refer to "Water Run-off" section of Environmental Checklist #20, 21 , 22 regarding drainage features. 20. Proposed signage for facility to be at located at main entrance to property and at the intersection of Hwy 101 and Oil City Rd. One sign facing North and One sign facing South. 21 . Each parking lot will provide handicap parking and access will be available in all facilities where required. 22. Currently the utilities come on to the property at main entrance driveway. dig S State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Soil Summary Sheet �_. SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL NAME Hoh silt loam SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 2960 Major Tree Species red alder, Sitka spruce Site Index RA-110 % Stocking (East. Washington) Landform low river terraces and floodplains S!npe Shape simple, nearly level Parent Material recent alluvium _ Elevation Range near sea level to 500 feet Precipitation Range 90 to 140 inches Organic Layer Thickness 1 to 2 inches Top Soil (Typical) dark reddish brown silt loam Underlying Soil Layers (Average) dark grayish brwon silt l oam and gravelly fine sandy loam Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 20 percent hard rounded. pebbles Restrictive Layer none Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drainage well drained • Permeability moderate Available Water Capacity moderate, freguently replenished Rooting Depth 40 to 60 inches Depth to «'ater Table N.A. incidence of Flooding occasional brief flooding, December through March • • • FOREST SOIL MANAGEMENT INTERPRETATIONS SOIL NAME Hoh SLOPE PHASE 0 to_a_percen_ STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 2960 r •SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable • Disturbed stable • •ROAD CONSTRUCTION. Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast Hazard N.A. Ballast Requirement low-medium Ballast Suitability N.A.* •TIMBER HARVEST • Logging System Limitation moderate Compaction Potential (Moist) high _ Displacement Potential (Dry/Moist) medium . Puddling Potential (Wet) high Erosion Potential 10W Rockiness Limitation N.A. •SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe Prescribed Burning Damage Potential medium •REGENERATION Drought Potential medium • Plant Competition severe Water Table & Flooding Hazard moderate Frost Action Damage Potential l oW Wind throw Potential medium * gravel substratums occur in some areas • • • State of Washington DEPARTMENT CF NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Soil Summary Sheet SO!L AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL. NAME -- Kalalock silt loam and silt loam, cool SLOPE PHASE 0 to 5 percent __ 800 STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 3806 3807 Major Tree Species western hemlock, Sitka spruce 3805: WH-115 Site Index 3806: WH-115 3807: WII-105 (cool phase) % Stocking (East. Washington) Landform river terraces Slope Shape simple, gently sloping _-- Parent Material silty alluvium over glacial outwash Elevation Range 50 to 600 feet Precipitation Rarge 100 to 140 inches' • Organic Layer Thickness 2 to 4 inches _ Top Soil (Typical) dark brown silt loam Underlying Soil Layers (Average) dark olive gray loamy fine sand • % Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 10 percent hard rounded pebbles Restrictive Layer none Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drainage well drained Permeability • _moderate above the rapidly permeable substratum Available Water Capacity _in oder_.te.,_.f.r_equ El n:L.ly__.i_eplen-is.h.esi_.___--- Rooting Depth 1 40 to 60 inches µ Depth to Water Table N.11. - - _ __- - -__ —_- — -- Incidence id l�Iondinr --- --- --__ ..____-_ • • • FOREST SOIL MANAGEMENT 1NTkRPRETATIONS . ._..� SOIL NAME -_� Kalaloch silt loam and silt loam, cool • SLOPE PHASE 0 to 5 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 380 3806 3807 °SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable • Disturbed stable •ROAU CONSTRUC'T'ION Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast Hazard N.A. Ballast Requirement medium Ballast Suitability N.A. •TIMBER HARVEST Logging System Limitation slight • Compaction Potential (Moist) high Displacement Potential (Dry/Moist) medium Puddling Potential (Wet) • high Erosion Potential low Rockiness Limitation N.A. •SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe Prescribed Burning Damage Potential low • REGENERATION Drought Potential low Plant. Competition moderate Water Table & Flooding Hazard N.A. Frost Action Damage Potential low Windt brow Potential high • • FOREST SOIL MANAGEMENT INTERPRETATIONS , i. SOIL NAME K1 one SLOPE PHASE ----------- 0 - 30% 30 - 65% 65 - 90% STATE SOIL SYMBOLS .r •— - --- --�— 71 3972 c973 3974 •SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable unstable ' unstable Disturbed stable unstable very unstable •ROAD CONSTRUCTION Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast. Hazard slight severe severe . Ballast Requirement low low low Ballast Suitability good good good •TIMBER HARVEST Logging System Limitation slight moderate severe (. . Compaction Potential (Moist) medium medium medium Displacement Potential (Dry/Moist) medium high high Puddling Potential (Wet) high g high high Erosion Potential low high high g Rockiness Limitation N.A. N.A. N.A. •SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe N.A. N.A. Prescribed Burning Damage Potential low low medium •REGENERATION Drought. Potential • low low low Plant. Competition -' moderate moderate moderate Water `Cable & Flooding Hazard N.A. N.A. N.A. • Frost Action Damage Potential 1 ow 1 ow low Windt hrow Potential ' medium medium medium ' - . II _ I State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • Forest Soil Summary Sheet SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL NAME -- - _�---_ Klone very gravelly loam SLOPE PHASE 0 - 15;' 15 to 30, 30 to 65, and 65 to 90 percent ''Cifti) STATE SOIL SYMBOLS p"m Major Tree Species western hemlock, Sitka spruce, few Douglas-fir 3970: WH-114 3973: WH-110 M. Site Index 3971: WH-110 3914: WH-105 3972: WH-108 % Stocking g (East. Washington) Landform terraces and terrace escarpments Slope Shape simple, level to steep • Parent Material poorly sorted glacial outwash Elevation Range 50 to 1,200 feet Precipitation Range 80 to 130 inches Organic Layer Thickness 2 to 5 inches 'fop Soil (Typical) dark brown_very gravelly loam +— Underlying Soil Layers (Average) • dark yellowish brown very gravelly loam % Rock Fragments (Average) --------------___ _-----___.__.. ._._.. ___. 40 to 60 percent hard rounded pebbles and cobbles Restrictive Layer t•tP Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches —^ ---- _.__ Drainage well drained Permeability �_ "' Permeability moderate rtvitilahle 1t'liter Capacity -- � M.Q.c era.t_o_ f_ez el1_f ly .re.p3eni.5 hed_----- —— Rooting Depth ____.__ 60 inches or more if•i Depth to Water Table' _-__ - _ — -- ------ — _ N.A '. - [ Incidence of Flooding N.A. • State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Soil Summary Sheet SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL NAME Riverwash SLOPE PHASE STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 6734 Major Tree Species noncommercial Site Index 1.7, Stocking (East. Washington) Landform very low terraces and flood plains Slope Shape simple, nearly level Parent Material very recent alluvium Elevation Range • Precipitation Range Organic Layer Thickness Riverwash consists of recent sandy, gravelly, or cobbly Top Soil (Typical) alluvium. It is in areas adjacent to or within stream Underlying Soil Layers (Average) channels and is frequently flooded and redistributed. % Rock Fragments (Average) • Restrictive Layer Soil Depth (Average) Drainage Permeability Available Water Capacity wa Rooting Depth Depth to Water Table Incidence of Flooding • • FOREST SOIL MANAGEMENT INTERPRETATIONS SOIL NAME Udifluvents, nearly level ' SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS ) •SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable Disturbed stable °ROAD CONSTRUCTION Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast Hazard N.A. Ballast Requirement low-medium • Ballast Suitability N.A.-gOod* •TIMBER HARVEST Logging System Limitation moderate Compaction Potential (Moist) high Displacement. Potential (Dry/Moist) medium Puddling Potential (Wet) high , Erosion Potential low Rockiness Limitation N.A. *SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe Prescribed Burning Damage Potential medium •REGENERATION Drought Potential medium • Plant Competition severe Water Table & Flooding Hazard moderate Frost Action Damage Potential •N A• • • * • Windthrow Potential medi um • • S State of Washington •. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Soil Summary Sheet SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL NAME Udifluvents, nearly level SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 13500 • Major Tree Species red alder Site Index RA-118 `.`o Stocking (East. Washington) Landform low river terraces and floodplains Slope Shape simple, nearly level Parent Material recent alluvium Elevation Range 10 to 500 feet Precipitation Range 90 to 130 inches Organic Layer Thickness 1 to 2 inches Top Soil (Typical) very dark grayish brown silt loam Underlying Soil Layers (Average) very dark gray sand % Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 70 percent hard rounded pebbles and cobbles Restrictive Layer coarsetextured substratum Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drainage somewhat excessively drained Permeability moderately rapid to rapid Available Water Capacity i,}Gpiral1y 1ow_,.._fregu n .lyy re lenichpd Root mg Depth • 20 to 40 inches or more Depth to water Table generals no water table within 60 inches Incidence of Flooding occasional brief flooding, December through March I I 4 .................r../' ' n m�! n 1 N N' N I i' N O rs C nN 6 ° i .�r = s Iu ry 1 1_II .., v`/ 1 1 N O N ..„, „N Q i i p i NN 1 • I S i'' w v _ c r g i I .N r i n F� , t h NN d o ` • a ; as 3a,• aa2S %Ilk ti 2 P.°— ..-- n I nN O b n ^ n 1 n N • n mm am~ I t n T3}1114r4101 „.„„„,.. n„ N N,6,. mm}N nj � -■ O .., ® U n .ti o m E... ( § r.- n 0„n 0 0 0 o n co . ,.,,... ._ , , T4 ® im o NIP,+” o n $N ng ES _ n g! nw n n iks 8r. . h., U CO N . n. n is n m f n r ill n� U H r I' § ■',- • ' r ,,,};»,�w-�.y-*"E �,to rw.im l`y 'k .n r 4 rpX(, < ° }x i a•^i:. • • RECEIVED JEFFERSON COUNT/ 1) 1 DIPAT!‘.,IENIT t 410 r •#6 ■ _1 iii^[�- /� HLT -iN Q--. --� - COUNTY OFFICES r-1 KITSAP ❑ CLALLAM J JEFFERSON ❑ MASON • 400 Warren Ave. 402 S. Lincoln 402 S. Lincoln 615 Alder P.O. Box 313 P.O. Box 1316 P.O. Box 1316 P.O. Box 327 Bremerton,WA 98310 ' Port Angeles,WA 98362 Port Angeles,WA 98362 Shelton,WA 98584 ' (206) 377.0133 (206) 457-0482 (206) 457-0482 (206) 426-8288 PROPERTY I • LAND TITLE COMPANY OF CLALLAM COUNTY IS PLEASED TO PROVIDE - YOU WITH THE MOST COMPLETE CUSTOMER SERVICE AVAILABLE IN CLALLAM COUNTY. IF THIS REQUESTED INFORMATION IS HELPFUL AND RESULTS IN A SALE, WE WOULD APPRECIATE THE TITLE ORDER BEING PLACED WITH LAND TITLE COMPANY. .SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF WE CAN BE OF FURTHER SERVICE, PLEASE ' CONTACT THE UNDERSIGNED. LAND TITLE COMPANY CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT BY: PREPARED FOR ( APPARENT RECORD OWNER BILL LEWIS RONALD'C, ANDERSON and GENEVA A, ANDERSON, his wife LUNSFORD & ASSQCIA,TES This description is subject to revision upon'` exarnination of title & no liability is assumed for inaccuracies. This description prepared by LAND TITLE COMPANY OF CLALLAM COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION The. South:half of the Northwest quarter in Section 4; AND Government Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 aid ti Section 5; EXCEPT that portion of Goverment Lots 1 and 2 lying North of Hoh_ ,fiver Rd; A,ND EXCEPT that portion of Government Lot 2 conveyed to Theodore Hugh. Day, et-ux, by deed recorded November 1, 1982, under Auditor's File No, 280797; ALL in Tranship 26. North, 'Range 12 West W.M. , Jefferson County, Washington. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL PAggRCEL NUMBER_ ASSESSED VALUE 19.87 TAXES 61 2051051 CGL ExcSN Hon-IOW $116,.0.95.00 _ 810 3.3.94 GL fi I 8- 45.62 612051002 (GL 2, Ex N Hoh R,Rd&Txl)$ 16,950.00 $ 159,46 612051003 (GL 5) S 500 S 146"46 . w • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Subject Property: State Land (Lease) Legal Description: North half of Northwest quarter in Section 4 ; All in Township 26 North, Range 12 West, W.M. , Jefferson County, Washington. S— Z!o a 7/ 6F 11)1j/- `'° Ga /0 / try' ("— , -26-- /l ) /6 , 47 , , f , c-f_.. 5 - 1 / 240 /$, 50A Let �� • 9/9/Ar • . %o Rap/ e,Q, 171,aA44-a-,,J _... U.S.Department ath L &').6 7300 a Airports District Office of Transporttation �/! �J�t � 7300 Perimeter Road South Federal Aviation �� /1 Y �� �+ }'��2�� A/ Seattle. Washington 98108 Administration RECEIVED 6>V rcro 9/9 iS 7 JEFFERSON COUNT; • ) d PLANNl,at;. !•'i': n,h....i,;NT Information Package to Establish a Landing Area It is necessary under Part 157 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of any proposal which would establish, alter, or abandon a landing facility. To fulfill this requirement, it is necessary to complete and return the enclosed FAA Form 7480-1, Notice of Landing Area Proposal . Please note in the enclosed Advisory Circular 70-2D that the location of the landing area should be marked upon a U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map or equivalent and sent to us along with the completed form. It is important to precisely locate the landing area so that your proposal can be properly processed. Depending on the complexity of your proposal, processing may take two months. The FAA G. SJ jurisdiction ever land 4nC V: uviLnG Gc : v v m~ ^d that you contact the appropriate city or county planning aaencv for information on land use policies in the heliport vicinity. We recommend that proposal be prepared on the basis of established development standards. A copy of the recommended dimensional standards will be forwarded to you when we have completed our review of your proposal. If you have further questions, please contact at (206) 431-15_ s Transmittal Jefferson County Planning Department County Courthouse Port Townsend, Washington 98368 ( 206) 385- 1427 TO "24 - DATE e j-p-? COMMENTS 03/—/S-3 2- ,r-r-. 4- 6(') . • 41'^.� } Jefferson County C - -. <,, , Planning and Building Department 1 - .t - - r, . p.o.box 1220 ,. , �, . ,, , y� ,�: county courthouse f - off" ,►5 , port townsend,washington 98368 M e, -- °,# (f, ,Iii 1 r,4°,0+ telephone 206 385-1427 r'1, wr, it, u'. 1 i e , , 1' �10'1 y ,r, 1�� 1. ,7 i�, � david goldsmith, director MEMORANDUM TO: Jefferson County Health Department Jefferson County Public Works Department Washington State Aeronautics Commission Washington State Department of Natural Resources FROM: Rachel Nathanson DATE: September 15, 1987 SUBJECT: Lower Hoh River Development, Land Use Review The enclosed environmental checklist describes a proposal for a recreational facility on the Hoh River in the West End of Jefferson County. The proposal will be reviewed by the county planning commission for conceptual and land use approval. I am requesting your comments on the proposal in regard to your agency's jurisdiction. State any conditions of approval that should be included with the proposal in the event it receives approval. Include any general comments you have on the proposal. Please submit comments no later than SEPTEMBER 25, 1987. RN:ph Enclosures • • } Jefferson County _� ,, 4,,j'; = t,,-°� A Planning and Building Department � �: p.o.box 1220 A.,.1i1/l 6t.N6—r-.-,,• .,'',' ." - a 41 '','' county courthouse f �"" � ;' port townsend,washington 98368 , ,M ( 1 ' m telephone 206 385-1427 , _ 1 ' - 44'' 1 ' david goldsmith, director MEW RANDUM TO: Adjacent Property Owners FROM: Rachel Nathanson DATE: September 15, 1987 SUBJECT: Lower Hoh River Development, Land Use Review The enclosed information describes a proposal for a recreational facility on the Hoh River. The proposal will be reviewed by the county planning commission for conceptual and land use approval. You are being notified of this proposal as an adjacent property owner. Your comments are invited and must be received by this department no later than SEPTEMBER 25, 1987. Please call me if you have any questions. RN:ph Enclosures COMMUNICABLE PU' HEALTH VITAL E NMENTAL HEALTH DISEASE CONTROL SING STATISTICS :ALTH EDUCATION .41111111111 .41groAr.- IC , S t JEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 802 SHERIDAN PORT TOWNSEND,WASH.98388 (206)385-0722 September 17 , 1987 Ms . Rachel Nathanson Jefferson County Planning 6c Building Dept . Jefferson County Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms . Nathanson: SUBJECT: Lower Hoh River Development Prior to approval , this resort facility will be required to submit complete engineered designs for all waste water disposal systems . Also approval must be granted for this facility as a public water system. Due to the proposed location of this development , the primary contact person will be Ray Franklin of Clallam County Division of Environmental Health. I have discussed this situation with Mr . Franklin. Sincerely, Rick Miklich Director of Environmental Health RM/vp cc : Ray Franklin, Clallam County Health Department 223 East Fourth Avenue Port Angeles, WA 98362 • REIVED ��'- C�11.ii'il3 L.AWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF r ' Natural Resources mow P'ANIvVA iji A H.NT BRIAN BOYLE ................................Eommissioner of Public Lands Olympic Area Office Route 1, Box 1375 Forks, WA 98331 September 21 , 1987 Jefferson County Planning & Building Dept. P.O. Box 1220 County Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 Attn: Rachel Nathanson RE: Lower Hoh River Development - Land Use Review Dear Ms. Nathanson: Thank you for the notification of the project on the NEµ Sec. 5, NW4 Sec. 4, T26N, R12W. You should be aware that the N+NW,'-, Sec. 4 is presently State owned Capitol Government land. The proponent has made inquiries about leasing this parcel from the State. As yet, the application to lease has not been received. We will have further comments when we receive the Lease application. The potential exists to make the removal of State owned timber adjacent to the proposed site difficult and/or impossible. Specifically, that timber located in Lots 10, 11 , Sec. 4, T26N, R12W, due to it's proximity to the development. There may be remedies to this problem thru lease of the additional affected land to the proponent. *Also, there exists an easement granted to B&R Investments which crosses the State land in the NZNW-', Sec. 4, T26N, R12W, under application #36436. This encumbrance would affect plans to develop that State land parcel . The State does not particularly object to this proposal , but we do have concerns and questions that must be answered by the proponent, prior to granting a lease and receiving our endorsement. Sincerely, George Flanigan Hoh Dist. Mgr. For: John M. Calhoun Region Manager Olympic Region GF:gw cc: Lewis Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer McCoy Vagt . 1 0 /4,--,--25; _,!, -- - i „::':( itii a --4 it p-p-k lii-S p-re....-.2‘," eg.---e- fir; 1., r. , ,.fir.„ , ` ,.1 ,- 7a - orks �o" -: tlru` k' ups-4r..w (1„G` ,'z Q ii 'tip'}". , .. 6 ;s JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE PORT TOWNSEND,WASHINGTON MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Dept. 5�'_ ' y L FROM : Public Works PLAT IIthu uc,•iI; DATE : September 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Lower Hoh River Development, Land Use Review The Public Works Department has reviewed the Environmental checklist for the Lower Hoh River Development and have the following comments on items below. Item # 70 - Should include, Oil City Road (a county road) will need to be improved from U.S. 101 through the proposed develop- ment. the Reason for the improvements is the increase of traffic from 220 trips per day to over 1000 trips per day. Item # 72 - Should read between 1000 and 1100 trips per day. Also, the proponent will need to dedicate an additional 10 feet of right-of-way through their proposed development. JEFFERSON OUNTY DEPARTMENT OF alBLIC WORKS • COURTHOUSE • RT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 91336fflir PHONE 3B5-3505 PROJECT Goweia_ j-,lr2fi k.-t,er2 1)6,1e'I p/ PAGE DATE 2/.* i {{ { f f a . g ..„,,,,,,, . , . . . : , , , . , ,, ,, . , , . , , , .. , ,. , ..., , , , ,lo . , 3_9 . } m t R� 6 a ; }}rr • ' /Y. .(—r.„... 4Gr s.fl./.72- $..C' ._ -'° / 0 __:; i2e::: ..5„...: �_..4IDt?x f-.,...ar1/4l,4L:: _ he sok.T. ! l f - , , - - •e. .;._ . . ' 6.. `g; �'_.. ..p ,1 y ._-7--� t-F 4c: i S 2.-z0•.,r4-Ccoi 'N2 4 e f/,Jr . .1-1.0"Cfr4 ,?7A 'u 1. ` .' -, a % S i e . \ ; r E �3E A'T_ la•$o=R T C ; 2 ? = 108Q 7--�s , i D , f f f a + ; _ , . s f 0 • + a + + + + + + + W W W W a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U U U * at at,' O W W O W ) 000 ammo a a a a a a t t t m m m') Z > > Z > N 0 0 WI 4 .. 01 O `to 0 0 fA • . + + + W W W 011110 1 o . o O o woo 0 0 0 U U U a R a F e ' wm W t W 0 0 0 — wee N N at PI O N t t t N t. N . > > ). ) > m a a 1 N O O O N \ G W W o r. N + + + W W W W W W k'� • o o n aD ao a ao ao j v V V aR aR at a a aw m m m ,VI ai •I 17 •4 C'S t t t m ao ao: w i i ,,04 n + + + W W W aF. o w e W W W \\ y • 000 aoaao macro m m 00aa 000 V w m m m N N N N M N J J J w w :J',. ) t T ) ) t a a a \ `,1 F h. • i x; CT O F.0 a 0 0 F. at at at W W CO W Id . ° 0 0 N ao ao N00 m ao m J J O o o= _ ) } Z } ) ao 0 ON 07 w m m m N N N N N N J J J w w w > O .1 Id N r ri, g 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 co N co m m m N N O 0 0 0 0 O W 0 0 0 CI) •- to m 0 N N co N N co J J J w w w.1 Z z z z z P. a g, to Z ° w CD CI, LLI 0 A wNN 444 i at at at }• Q a O O N N 0 III 2 a w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : ?.. 2 1 z1 Q ca s i `s J J s J 1 F I- ZZ z mZ I- z pz 0 w J 1 Z .1 - Z J G m .11 Z J O Z J O Z .,41.! Z J O ` U 4 ' t lei ry� mmt t O t mt Z w K 1 1 2 1 ; C 1 a e a ; C N D M N D X W ; C N 1 9 X C E' — — IC a F- a ° 1 w V s 1 k N Id 5 ; gil ill E i g a. m i 11 ) 1 3 i Id i 1 i la d 1 1 g 6 I I; If i s 4 ill 1 t N Z — ; I Swy9 • • • N 6 v 3 U, • a 0 v w S / O / 2 / / 4 / �a/!i3 / /tia / So I rd Q•;NIE ?o I 0 •? (glI W I . 6 i 9. NI>r V; sll i (.0 ` c 3aj,II=0 vusi Col i N 111=M •�=11i { m a 4 or: o Q I lsr 'aua Q MILE o Z rs1 MILE O_AI_ r1=W t a �1tt =N� WO �. V.luI n NI: n W LL. •:vIiIJ y c Il tll I §8 ! 0=N I } .I 1 �V \ VIII o%• uI Ile NIE =IN In i^n s. di 0 •,' ' , lilt r ,' �, +' -, . ' ,I �1.. i,� aria 1i:. 1 l 4��I-_ --k.., :• l4I ,,,,;'4.'1 i I�Y, ... III Y _- FORKS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 1249 • FORKS, WASHINGTON 98331 Oct. 3, 1987 Jefferson County Court House Planning Commision P.O.Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA. 98368 Dear Members of Planning Commision: Deanna D. Muller of the Lower Hoh River Development, brought to our attention that they have been pursuing a tourism resort development project at the West End of the Peninsula, near the Forks. The Chamber of Commerce has joined the decision of the West End Business and Professional Association to support the project. Because, 1. The project will become a significant tourist destination resort which is the common desire of the business community as well as the expectation of many citizens of the west end of the Peninsula. 2. The project development will create direct job opportunities during the construction, and will create permanent jobs for many citizens after construction. 3. The resort could bring tourist dollars to the west end tourist industries as well as other businesses. A project of this magnitude in the West End will positively impact the ec1onomy in the adjacent area, known as an economically distressed area, the west end of Clallam County as well as Jefferson County. Therefore, with a great pleasure, we would like to express our support to the proposed project by the Lower Hoh Development and we wish them luck in pursuing the project. If you have any further question, please let us know. Sincerely, l'C'4 /6/44i ,..`-&...-e-r.....-e- Rich Hsu, Pres. m Bennett, Pres. The Forks Chamber West End Busi .& Prof. of Commerce Association cc. Deanna Muller, lower Hoh Development Bob Levin, Clallam County EDC Ted Gage, Clallam County TACC • • • , a- JEFFERSON COUNTY ii =.H PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT - . .l -i . 4-. ' r , .1 - - ,ac t -- A ' h d ,A1-;.. t �..°'"r P(l. Box 122( 7 R . � � � . • !i",:-..;•,.. Port 7iwns(nd, Vashii , ton !NUS it 1. 14 . lli 7p.iv,.�t� Planning (206) 355-014() i P l .l — M1 •)' ' Building (206) 385-9141 r _ . JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE David Goldsmith, Director December 9. 1987 Mr. John Calhoun Rural Route 1. Box 1375 Forks, Washington 98331 Re: Sepa Checklist; Lower Hoh River Development Dear Mr. Calhoun: I received the environmental checklist and determination of non-significance (DNS) regarding the state commercial land lease to Deanna Mueller. Our the DNS for the state property department has no comment on the issuance of he Di S �or p p y p - lease. however, we are reserving lead agency status for the review of the entire Lower Hoh River Development project. An environmental checklist regarding the development of a resort and 18 hole golf course has been received by this department. It has been undergoing review since September 1987. Pending additional information from the applicant, your department will be notified of the county's threshold determination. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the threshold determination on the state property lease. Sincerely, gib i / lap, / Rachel Nathanson Senior Planner RN:mkg • Li-d WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF RECMED Natural Resources �� 1.987 JEFFERSON COUNTY BRIAN BOYLE BOARD OF C MMt ONER:5 Public Lands OLYMPIA, WA 98504 November 30, 1987 File No: 87-113002 TO: Planning Director, Jefferson County Environmental Coordinator, Department of Ecology Environmental Coordinator, Department of Fisheries Environmental Coordinator, Department of Game FROM: Marsha Hixson, Environmental Coordinator Analysis and Planning Section Department of Natural Resources 1011 10th Ave. S.E. Mail Stop EM-11 Olympia, WA 98504 (586-4438) RE: SEPA LEAD AGENCY AND THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS This is to advise you that pursuant to WAC 197-11-900 (922 through 948) , the Department of Natural Resources has determined that it is Lead Agency for the following: State commercial land lease of 80 acres to be developed as part of an 18-hole golf course, about 14 miles south of Forks, Jefferson County. Please notify us immediately if you do not concur with this Lead Agency determination. Enclosed are an Environmental Checklist and Determination of Nonsignificance pertaining to this proposal. Pursuant to WAC 332-41- 504, this proposal was listed in the department 's SEPA public information center at 1011 10th Ave. S.E. , Olympia, WA on 11/30/87, and we will consider comments on proposed Determinations of Nonsignificance received by 12/14/87. The proposed determination will become effective on 12/15/87 unless we advise you of a change in this determination after reviewing your comments . Enclosure c: Bill Lewis, Olympic Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer ��`tn�rt9. II . ow 'c t - i t Department of Natural Resources BRIAN BOYLE ,rye goy OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON co.m*� d Puts Lands Let 98504 DETERMINATION OF NONSIONWICANCE Description of proposal Pending a state carmercial land lease (80ac) to be developed as part of 18 hole golf course. Proponent Deanna D. Mueller Location of proposal, including street address, if any Approximately 1.2 miles SW of the Hoh River bridge/highway 101 and 1.3 miles NE of DNR Cottonwood Cam Grounds. About 14 mi1Pa south of Forks and about 1 mi1P west alnng the Oil Cify road_ Lead agency Department of Natural Resources The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. Ad environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ?Si There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); th�jj I d c will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date low. Comments must be submitted by /cam c%/f"7. Responsible official `7 M. Calhoun Position/title Olympic Regional Manager Phone 174- 111 Address RR 1 Box 1375 Forks, Washington 98331 Date Nov 17, 1987 Signature ' I �.�`r' `-'' rt'`"'•--- There is no agency SEPA appeal. 4 `_ • . - � ` .. R . Or 1 a I ji g Z in 04 .P'4 '— s ''s ''': i .ii. k.--i_ - 1 . : NI1 _ • i� '4\4 T was_ �D! , 11 Z ` Z , o 'w a1. / 1VC cA t� alb._ /' , g o I :an g , :. ., • •• , .,_.:?:: ,•., 141 • „„,,,, • _,.... . . 31'1 r.,4. v � i _ _ , „.._ ,,,,y,r-44k lb lig 2 if tl) ‘ . Z” 4---Ni It 1 , Cs t 4 \ -1) ,...4 ‘i i 1 C- ti► F 8 .1 1 rii =. tT In 1Vile, 4 .... 1 r, q a. (tl I p .1:. 1 T ∎� 1 4 ?:-.) I i - - t . A •a013 3 -J ij i iti - 11 \ 1 i s t. ��)'- - -- �`- n. - - 1 \ it g r J I _ _ t Q L k ii l J - -. ii p R , j �'# 1 p 2 q ` ' 1 ► I pi c 5 i( 1 1:- I !/ , I 0 1 ► - - - ECe< FENCE, t 1 / \ 1 ■ x, \ (-)7C) : i, i c \ 2• C� ,c. \ , �L r N F's-c-7- R \ . 1`i '_ t° = R //�N v.. ,,..;---..„4„..,............„_._::::, - .04.,, AO/ R■ 'VIVA/ 4. "" ••,.. ... .. F lie en " • • a A Department of Natural Resources OMAN OOYL>E OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON Cemoirlossir Pubbc tees. 1889 98504 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpc>'.c rl.( hrckli.st: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions lOr Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. I ,e of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- I,I IIo\. complete the SLAV' F.MENTAI. SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. \. I4\c k( R UL \t) I \:Ime of proposed project, if applicable: Lower Hon River Development Name of applicant: ) \ddress and phone number of applicant and contact person: Deanna D. Mueller (206) 374-9185 Rt 1 Box 137 Forks , WA 983:51 -I. Date checklist prepared: September 24 , 1987 \gene\ requesting checklist: Department oI Natural Resources () Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction of golf course (ie : planting gre ns and fairways) upon approval of state land lease application. Proiect completion June 1989 . Construction of resort on adjacent land to begin March 1988 and completed June i989 . Do \ou have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal'' If \cs, explain. N,, . Department for ove project. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly ;tlfectinz the property covered by your proposal'' If yes. explain. None 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Jefferson County Planning and Building Departments Jefferson County Health Department Washington State Department of DSHS (Public Water System) Department of Natural Resources Washington State Liquor Control Board I I. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) State lease land to be used as part of 18 hole golf course which will be part of the overall project of a destination resort which will cover approximately 280 acres. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area- provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity neap, and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Project site is located 14 miles South of Forks , WA, making. a right hand turn onto Oil City Rd. approximately 1 mile to Anderson Property driveway on left hand side of road~ Please see attached legal description, site plan and vicinity map, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICkNT LyAI l All((\ 1((R A(;Lti('1 l 11 ((\I 1 B. E\1IRONME\TAI. ELEMENTS I. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) Fl , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other `.;enerail} flat on two plains . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'' slope , generally fiat on two plains . —2— r • TO RE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached Forest Soil Summary . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No visible indications of unstable soils - portion of property located in 100 year flood zone. c. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed. Indicate scarce of fill. Grading and fill required for gol t course - fill to be select sand and gravel . Appropriate excavation for building' foundations , roads and pathways . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Land to be left as natural as possible , graded areas to be planted with native plant iife (grasses , trees & shrubbery) and surfaced with rock & maintained. Do not anticipate erosion problem due to above control measures . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Less than 107.. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Planting of native plant life (see f) and rock surfacing on pathways and parking areas . 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, ecnerally describe and give approximate quantities if known. C Tens. rary emissions d'iring construction dirt/dust from roads and heavy equipment exhaust. Resort operations - heating/cooling system exhaust, wood smoke , laundry , auto , kitchen, maintenance vehicles , golf carts exhaust. b Are there any off—site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so. generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: incorporate into overall plan regulations pertaining to emissions control . Exhaust systems designed by manufacture of kitchen appliance's ; chimneys and combustion engines . -3- • AGENCY USE ()NI I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Hoh River runs through SW corner of site. Wet spots in lower pastures, natural springs an stream border-mg west side of site. All water appears to run off into h6,a River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No work will occur within the shoreline management jurisdiction. Netural spring will be incorporated into landscaping. :LWet spots will be avoided and remain natural ponds. Livestock barns will be located in 100 yr flood zone. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. No dredge material will be disturbed. No fill will be removed from or placed within surface waters or wetlands . Refer to site plan for fill and grading locations. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Surface waters to remain natural and undisturbed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Partial - see Flood Zone Map and site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Surface waters will not be disturbed. For discharge of waste material refer to septic plan. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water to be withdrawn through well for drinking and human uses . Septic and drain field system for waste disposal . • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Waste - domestic sewage , restaurant waste , livestock waste, laundry , clorinated pool water. System will be of required size by county and state health departments . System to serve maximum occupancy of 100 unit hotel , restaurant and all other on site facilities . -4- • In III I 1'%1l'1 I III) II "11•I'I I/ X1`.1 I VAI LATIO% LOR AGENCY USE ONLY c Halter Runoff (including storm water): I ) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water Ilou into other waters? If so, describe. Run off water w ter will net be drastically altered . Present drainages will De managed and mai:trwined Refer to Forest Soil Summary showing soil permeability. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,_generally describe. None anticipated tor surface waters . Septic waste to be controlled by septic systetr. Other wastes .will be contained and transported to appropriate dumping faciiiLy. ie : auto oil . d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if .in.- Surface and ground water will not be intentionally disturbed. Run off should not present a challenge as high soil permeability. See Forest Soil Summary. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of e'etation found on the site: x_ deciduous tree:MO,`. . aspen, other y evergreen treed 4011,T411t other shrubs grass 4_ pasture crop or grain Previously grass hay crop X ■►et soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ■.atcr plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation h What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Minimum :umber of trees , shrubs , grass to be removed ed Gcbuweeg sl nag1ipucclellCOptel nrfeaiber eintinw cur c�` st. threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknowi. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance. vegetation on the site, if any: Pi anti ng native grasses , local truiL trees , indigenious flowers and shrubs , deciduous trees , conifer trees . Atiosphere of site to remain essentially natural and nistic . lnimals a. Circle an■ birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to he on or near the site: birds:Mb heron. eagle.4:pn�irds other: m;lninials. deer, bear lb beaver, other: Elk only ani,r,a1 observed fish: bass. Imo. 141k,herring, shellfish, other: •h 1 ist .iii■ threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown -5- IIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIMIIMIIII d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Keep property as close to natural slate as possible in relationship to development. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. Electricity , wood burning, -natural gas, generators , gasoline. Energy sources will be for heat, lights, safety systems , cooking, back up power , automobile fuel. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Appropriate measures will be incorporated into building design to minimize energy waste . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal'? If so, describe. Gas pumps - proper maintenance and satety practices. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire systems and back up generators. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Proper maintenance and safety practices - specific hazards unknown. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction. operation, other)'? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary during construction heavy equipment, building noises (hammers , saws , etc) workers vehicles . During operatoins : delivery vehicles , customer traffic , maintenance equipment, livestock, people. Hours noise to be expected , reasonable '6- daylight hours. • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? I dicatc whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. 1 private residence tor manager and family. Dormitory type housing for employees. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Notf_applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Buildings :-:. 3 stories , buildings exterior to be wood. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Design of buildings and grounds to be compatitle with surrounding land and area life style. 1i. light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur'? Outside hu ' lding liah'cs , lighted waikways , restaurant and h i otel nterior i ts , mainly occuring 4 teT sunset. b. tou light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views'? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity'? Fishing, hunting, horseback riding, beach combing, hiking, camping, sight seeing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. _g- • \r jefferson county planning dept. ► �i <, JI courthouse C l ' � t port townsend wsshington 98368 �� 1- 3 telephone 12061 385-1427 M:. cL . tf devid goldsmith director FILE MEMORANDUM FILE: _ FROM: ( 26 --e7 DATE: fl COMMENTS: ) ,6"e Ave) teee._ egtiee--4 t-ter A4A-4z e G I ' . • • r-A ,�..; JEFFERSON COUNTY ( ( A .i--, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT (` it 7 f f i I { lid 1i i .r . '. r '"is. P.O. Box 1220 (' „j� � - Port Townsend, Washington 98368 ill Planning Telephone (206) 385-1427 u ' E B uilding Telephone (206) 385-1310 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE David Goldsmith, Director November 5, 1987 Ms. Deanna Mueller Route 1, Box 137 Forks, Washington 98331 Re: Lower Hoh River Development Dear Ms. Mueller: Thank you for your time during our site inspection on October 27, 1987. It appears that the area within which the buildings will be placed is well out of the flood hazard area. The following issues remain as possible significant environmental impacts. If you can agree to the proposed mitigation, I would expect that we can avoid the requirement for an environmental impact statement. 1. Light, glare and noise from the facility would be far greater than what currently exists. Mitigation: A minimum of a 100 foot wide buffer of existing trees and vegetation would remain along all property boundaries, except for approved access points. 2. The anticipated average daily traffic generated by the facility will be a major impact to the county road. Mitigation: An additional ten feet of right-of-way along Oil City Road shall be dedicated to the county. The project proponent shall pay a proportionate share in the improvements to Oil City Road, as determined by the Jefferson County Public Works Department. The road approach onto Oil City Road shall be improved in accordance with the public works department requirements. 3. Any substantial development within 200 feet of the floodway of the Hoh River will necessitate the approval of a shoreline substantial development permit. Currently, the floodway boundaries are undetermined. Mitigation: The proponent shall furnish reliable information as to the boundaries of the floodway and shall set back substantial improvements 200 feet from the floodway (or secure shoreline permits if within the 200 feet). 4. Ground water quality may be impacted by the discharge from sewage disposal systems. Soils in the area exhibit rapid permeability and possible hazard of contaminating nearby groundwater. Mitigation: The proponent shall furnish reliable information as to the proper disposal of septic effluent and protection of the existing groundwater quality. • • Ms. Deanna Mueller 2 November 5, 1987 The above proposed mitigate environmental ' aline the en mitigation would allow us fin to review with the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. I will need your response to such mitigation in writing. If you need additional clarification of the mitigation regarding road improvements, please call Bob Nesbitt, county engineer at 385-3505. Once the environmental review is finalized, the final binding site plan must be prepared and filed with the county. The binding site plan will show the development in detail. The plan would be reviewed and approved by local agencies (planning, public works department, and health department) and when filed with county "binds" the proponent to the proposal. Building permits may then be issued based on the binding site plan. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Rachel Nathanson Senior Planner RN:mkg cc: Jefferson County Public Works Department Jefferson County Health Department 1 (41 14 i i 1 .C! 4 .... Ili Z N • a . M 9 X 1111 I B Z 41 I 11\:g . I II 1fA }� 11 ° 60 t. 2 0 ; ° '' n 131 1 1 1 * *4 a n 1 U1 _ 1 'p - t [ . 1 fl Ifl 11 o Z m �! m c C z ,. C C X C M ill . C C Z i S _ c � Z A C' � � C Z A Z � Z A G � � < W A C' i m l m m Z' VII m m m m m m m � a WO'� � r z v z r tZ O r �Z p r �Z p t _ t)' z p- - r Z A !9 A W 19 A 19 z z z z z z z i . t r r r r r r P Z CD i i to Id to Z Z Z Z Z Z r r r p o p Z Z.Z N N N .0, .A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ha ZS i0 5Z a a a Oo A .A O o o f I N NO rn Cr) c/ z (4w A { Z Z Z Z Z r r r r r r N N N N N N 000 .-• VI 0 0 0 0 O O O O O at ae ae 0 0 co N N N t o 0 G O O N „1 „I .i o N M W 0 0 A m { Z A { O .=r r r r r r N N N N N N 0 0 A o + g m m m m aR at at 0 0 t c c c ii: a'' i1 g I _ 0 M , \ A A 0 A A A A A m l r r r r w re W N 0 w N 0 0 0! n 0 0 0 m O O m m O A O t1D A O 0 0 0 � �` m m m m m m at .aR aR -I -1 -I + + + a ^ pl : o \ '.' \1/4 i , . 4 ... us XI \ A A sn { :O Oo ao ! > f w m w w 4o W o� o, a q •' O o o P A A a4 ; ; n n n to : A o o : + + N o o •,,, \ - . o M \ 'N 1 s' ; p 0 ` 0 C o N .� v ! ! > m w w to to w a o, a L. o t4 1{9 lq 19 at at at n n n to o m w a co 0 0 o . d 0 m m m m m m + + + 0 2 N ii o to UI {{ { Z { { Z c;01 0 01 ) ) ) A A A A A A of A o o o IR A O A A O ,'at a R at c a n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m + + + + + + + i- • t1) HI t 1)MI'I 171.1) HY APPLICANT EVALUATION PUR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. I Historic and Cultural Preservation a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Unkl;own. b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation I. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See site pion :nd area map, b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No , nearest stop 14 miles North in Forks , WA_. c. Ilm► many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Number of parking spaces to be determined by cq my rec,ommenclations . [adequate space is available for gg� Dark n needs . d. \1 i11 t(�c proposal require an} new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets. not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or priyatel. Existing private roads on property will be upgraded to handle additional traffic - grading, gravel , etc . additional private driveways will be on property to allow for maintenance vehicles to access property. e \\ ill the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta- tion' If so, generally describe. — --- Heliropter Landing Pad on Site. • f many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If knot'∎n. Indicate when peak volumes would occur. 100 doily trafri' would be spread through out day. Peak traffic April - October. -9- • I and inge. _ � r 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire protections. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Fire system on site. 16. Utilities • a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse serv- ice, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. gas pump and holding tank. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Cl: llam County PUD, Natural Gas - Doxol , Telephone - Peninsula Telecom, Garbage - Sanitary Landfill (facility garbage truck) , Gasoline - local delivery service (to be selected at a later date) . C. SIGNATURE The above answers a true and compl- - to the best of m knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is r ng on them t o ..: ,ecis, Signature: ... a4/? :Q Date Submitted: 9 Approved by: Title: Date: -10- '_~.. ' : - : — i ---ct. -.. :41j0"--4.1.,-1-1-nalar-- • : -Linvile :RIR:11. i- . ,". : 4. :' 1 1 ! 1 -, .1 ! r. _ : .... ,,.1_4> -..raw A __ .. _ , . . . , t• - I 1 '3, ,--1--. i -- . - i. , -:-. r., rtiqrni • im, . --: -_,1,-_71:: .„-,--. .;--;_-4'-r_i! _,. -'6. 3 .1:,_-_,,ukl: aul:t_._,,,..t_iiejl ,z,.. 1 N re,,,.1 SIM' Illigigill 4..., I . . -- , , ! . g 4 -'-j- .- 1 1..! -1----1--. I 0-----iti.fu -nem --f-t- ill Si-;-' , . \ro dais FL : ..; ,.._/ I. I,. I.*'......_I ,3_.S.—I_i'Z _ .I__, .i__.... VIM 4 Tit— I_ .. ..- -4-1 4----\ *-1" i . t, i..1 t..1 I . !_1.1 .1.— .r, 0-,wu.. IA I L__', . lies •o 1 t_..1 L 14 • . H .1 i. ___....._ 1 :, _ i... .. 4 1 : . , • _ ..1 ;.., , . .H.....i.... f. i - 1,_..,;_fit.. _i_ • _...,_ .....,__.. ....r . _1_1; . , 1--, d 1 i i , . . _ i. . , ._._ , i i _F 1 i 7 I-4- lin /4 Flqiik ." • --.1',IT'7 --t: I --#1 J-11:itl---"I. 171: . . . --1--, 1-1 . i 7 •g 8, I 1-'7' i' i 1-i -t i'-I. - - - "4J1- ' --;:...1- : I•-;•-r .-"-i--:-I- 1-...-- ; '-u ; I Fr 1.-_i_s_t. ''.71—__t_11: '' l', ',L, .:-LE : ri'...,•-_,___;r-tf. ,14. 4... _..,_.4. ! .4___,I.; i /,_ . .4__'. ___ __ _El_4_::- .- . r, ,;-- , . .1 , yea --t-- .•..... ..---4 ' i .-- •-•*----.•-■"•-•--.- • 3 . . ,_ _fl_L.'__t_tL ; ; _1._ ',___,_. , 7. • .I • 'i - . t , ' t 1- i • • I ; f . • , •; 7 i-- -1-'1-1 -i "..1---'t-4- ' '7" ' - ---'''"' a , ...0, . ,,,,,,„,,,. , . 2 , ., . ., ...., , _ _4_ ,. . • , . -. : , ,_ i :.. _,....,,__‘_,__,_:... 2 , : , ,... w ,, a , . _4_-__ ,,,,_ .._ . . , . , •. . 4.....7 115,4 ' i .1- :- -1------.- i r 4 '' .7 1 1 ._at IsAl r _., , ..... I .. 1 1 , 1_ , ; i , 1 t . !-..-1--,-;--; - 1-----. ', 1 -: —1- ; - 1 t --.--4-.,- • • .. \ .-.. ---4.- rz. ,_.__.....__, . -....„...—.. 4,1) .--- '1 .'-'2.--1--, ,-- .---. . • k- ; tri in- iv_ ...,.. - g 6 g .4.-- e ' - . , al__ . . • -t_ti 1 x,31 RAYONIER,It/C \ 15 ' \J SCHOOL —41 .../ / LAN 3,2 + �4 D —�� IOI • 40 ., 3,2., — _� J - _ i RA„ 1/.11 ti ER VC ST r� i "°�� \` �. STATE ■ ; r ✓vE' '; ho�. ...'\c :(STATE STATE _ } RAYr h:E.,;NC STATE RAYON( ea,INC , 3„Al — f, • I j Jill _.- ' 1-1-Af / - .... lirr,, I 21 ,� 38. , I 35 1s1 9 TAT E. 1 RAY' . Es INC. STATE ' 8\'- 27 38.2 30 • G1' 2�r 5 1 / — I RAYON1eR• INC.. 2 i 1. �3to 3Gesl __ 1 I O C-AIIAM 41 D s :8.aa -C < a � :-1—41 —� --3;--\-- 2 �1• 3' 7 29°5 29 St.' 14-4c2. •1 L<<, II, ? L . . c.eilL 38 c)I 1ry� • ' ' t — }\ NAUY� -t.- . o �� Art., $ ++ r...••`I ' RAYONIER,In,C ' / mss) ✓ 98.931 11.„N\: I 7 y 5 Aso- )n,lp ` S ATE RnvD+2- T 31 3.I 3� •d L9T . 39-20 / 4 3 �, — ,j STATE \ STATE c' Z32 °a<5 o�E� G_ c-L N OC'4 s. ti.5. - -a1 CL F 1C. 39.'41 \ 0'` 4 —Si --- L. �J. ‘-t--3/4 �J� a2 5 2.,C j�F�E C• ��� y I 1 1 `� ��s 4�j-T 2 1 —4-—• I "\ • + ` 'slst +, 91 1 45)It 4. 4 I a. 3•J1f7.9!\ 4e M_ e {,, '/ t•3 'a 1e to.)I\ Oo RAfrON1ER I INC Or G INc• ri.., ktail 60 I - 1 :..'.,t*S_; < 'If E 7*t \ M I L.W A •K E E 25;0 J it �Y w. •jIf� Is.._,_. ye 34 BO 'I ,`34 C.O S �{ i/ .so +s •MIJe Kbc.. ;�? 1 `$ TE '��t_ /n 1. __ �, — `� ,�.Ic � 23.De', 1f.1e. I J1 e- 29374 30 io,;� ,� 0 �• `rit c M Y'JNIER,IN r MICwA1JKF�E �I t �� ��V' ST TE )e 4:• _L . LAND CO. 1;1: e a. I _ ,',,....,: 4.' CO S 1 i �.�ti< —7>, '7�4. I —1— 14c S ,2"1 grovieR INS e 9r y0 Q 11, ., OAro,,E¢ 3R 7- )arc LOwt3r I�ph „I _ / 1 e2 ,.1,1.11Lyi'Au C E . CO. - ;.r. STrTE Fire Camp s:, S 57 e 7s.ts0”-- 77.6 15 oe F. 2, 1 / , `. A3 Sit :i_., r�4 u.s. % U.S. I�l✓I RAYONIep It-C / Cr '-•.'. a, �: '6 14 RAYO, F4 Ir.( I/ } is is\' s,° 59.�s IoN�E , l� �� . �,05 441 1 �. L u.s Ito 1 Y � s..e.� t•., _ _ _.�Q P �r�1LIAt rr� ; LANG CO. R .> r2 ATOMICR,bti Fla p I ¢ a' . o-Y� FP Ili _ 1 N 4 • 36 es O — - W a I r \\ . �:.,v ,c . C .r \ �� • -� ' MILWAIJKE -AI .r . 1 1 r '� rt--* 1 .'� r.11LY/AJY_r y _4 dA,a•J--n Lac l - L - ------ - — -^— _ -- ' -. 1 11 I/ I � • Fr . LEGAL DESCRIPTION Subject Property: S State Land (Lease) Legal Description: North half of Northwest quarter in Section 4 ; All in Township 26 North, Range 12 West , W.M. , Jefferson County, Washington. • • S� !Nests 1 Wn.AMOlon OCPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUHCE3 Forest Soil Summary Sheet SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SUIT. NAME Hoh silt loam SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS r. 2960) Major Tree Species red alder, Sitka spruce • Site Index RA-110 So Stockirg (East. Washington) --•------ —.--- Landforrn low river terraces and floodplains Slope Shape simple, nearly level Parent Material recent alluvium Elevation Range near sea level to 500 feet Precipitation Range 90 to 140 inches Organic Layer Thickness 1 to 2 inches Top Soil ('Typical) _dark reddish brown silt loam - Underlying Soil Layers (Average) dark grayish brwon silt loam and gravelly fine sandy loam Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 20 percent hard rounded. pebbles_ Restrictive I sayer none _ Sail Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drainage well drained Pc:rneability moderate Available Water Capacity moderate fre- t.entl replenished_ ----- Rooting Wpt1' 4U to 60 inches -- -- - - -- I?:ptlr to Water "1'nl�lc --------•- --------- - ---- __ - -- Ins idence ul I.I(wdifi;; — - occo ,ional brief flooding , fleece.::_,'_ through Narcit - FOREST SOIL MANAGEMENT INTERPRETATIONS SOIL NAME Hoh SLOPE PHASE 0 to Lpercent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS C'2961 •SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable Disturbed stable •ROAD CONSTRUCTION Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast Hazard N.A. Ballast Requirement low-medium Ballast Suitability N.A.* 6 TIMBER HARVEST Logging System Limitation C moderate Compaction Potential (Moist) high - — — Displacement Potential (Dry/Moist) medium Puddling Potential (\Vet) high Erosion Potential low Rockiness Limitation N.A. • SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe Prescribed Burning Damage Potential medium • REGENERATION Drought Potential medium Plant Competition severe Water Table & Flooding Hazard moderate Frost Action Damage Potential low \Vindthrnw Potential medium * gravel substratums occur in some areas , - • ;.,; ' NrA7F4AL"RLSOURCE i - Foraet Soil Summary Sheet SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SUIT. NAME Kalalock silt loam and silt loam, cool SLOP PHASE 0 to 5 percent MO STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 3806 3807 Major Trce Species western hemlock, Sitka spruce 3805: WII-115 Site Index 3806: Wf-115 3807: WII-105 (cool phase) `i. Stocking (East. Washington) Landform river terraces Slope Shape simple, gently sloping Parent Material silty alluvium over glacial outwash Elevation Range 50 to 600 feet 1 Precipitation Rar„e 100 to 140 inches Organic Layer Thickness 2 to 4 inches Top Soil (Typical) dark brown si 1 t loam Underlying Soil Layers (Average) dark olive gray loamy fine sand ''i, Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 10 percent hard rounded pebbles Restrictive Layer none Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drainage well drained _ - -- Permeability moderate-. bove- he _rapi dl y_permeabl e_ sub stra tum Available Water Capacity moderate_.--f negacrtliy-replenished_ __________ Rornin;; Dept l' 110 to FO inches - — Dcrth to Water Table -- — — ., { N.A. ' = - T801lMANAGEM = ,ti. NnML ENT INTERPRETATIONS 4) SLOPE }1 i, .. ASIr Klone STATE SOIL SYMBOLS -`—~ —._ 30 - 65Z ��_�_ � .�. '71 65 - 90Z •SLOPE STABILITY r 39 913 Natural r Disturbed stable ---�_ unstable •I{U�,U CON stable unstable CONSTRUCTION unstable Cut Slope, Fill & S;clecast very unstable `t Hazard Ballast Requirement slight f severe Ballast Suitability low severe k- low rT r 'r11,113LI{ HARVEST good low - -_ good Logging System Limitation good t r Compaction slight Potential (Moist) moderate •- Di:rl,tarer - Severe '` 'rt Went Potential medium 4 (1)r�•/Moist) medium ; I'uclrllirr� Potential 'fled Itan - medium - ,,. cli (Wet) _ high �_ Erosion i • ,... un Potential high '— ____`qh :a h1 Vt ' ' high ltuC!{111NSS Limitation low ----� high high -`' l`Y''` SITE PREPARATION N.A. — ----,_____1 high ,,�?}fix N.A. � ; 1T,1.. Scarification Damage N.A. ice: 1 ' • Prescribed sever . ' Iiurnirtg 1�arr,age Potential severe _ N.A. low Drought Potential ~""t medium 'lam Competition low low Voter Table modera .r;< & 1 to low 1 loudinh Hazard :, aerate --�_ r ' .st Action N.A. tnoderc�te ' t2 Damage Potential '' N.A. . . `. ,; 'nclrhrr,��, !>nt lOb/ N•A. et,ti�l ~�� low med i urt low medium medium ._11 1)0 . ••X'' NTAL CHARACTERISTICS SOIL NAME Klone very gravelly loam SLOPE PHASE - -------- -- 0 - 15, 15 to 30, 30 to 65, and 65 to 90 percent • ,R Imo, -- STATE SOIL SYMBOLS ���� Major Tree Species Western hemlock, Sitka spruce, few Douglas-fir 3970: WH-114 3973: WH-110 Site Index 3971: WH-110 3974: WH-105 3972: WH-108 % Stocking (East. Washington) -- _ Landform terraces and terrace escarpments ___.. —--- ---•--_____- --------- Slope Shape -- - _ _ -- — Simple, level to steep Parent Material poorly sorted glacial outwash Elevation Range 50 to 1 ,200 feet Precipitation Range 80 to 130 inches ----- Organic Layer Thickness 2 to 5 inches Top Soil (Typical) dark brown very gravelly loam --`- i Underlying Soil Layers (Average) I dark yellowish brown very gravelly loam `i, Rock Fragments (Average) ------- - — -- — --- -- - - -- 40 to GO percent hard rounded pebbles and cobbles Restrictive Layer sone Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches Drninagv well drained 1'ertninl,i!ily __ moderate :lvnila},li• Wafer ('tip,icit} _ - - - - .._.. — - — moderate., _I_r.c.quent;ly roplenished------ liooting Depth _GO- inchits_or o Depth to Water Table n: re- - - -- ----- __ -- [ Ine;den,0 ot rl.A. _--- _ ----- -- rr.A. • e oil Summary 40')et SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS SUIT, NA MI.: Riverwash SLOPE PHASE STATE SOIL SYMBOLS •734 Major Tree Species noncommercial Site Index '..t> Stocking (East. Washington) Lnndform very low terraces and flood plains Slope Shape simple, nearly level Parent Material • very recent alluvium Elevation Range Precipitation Range Organic Layer Thickness Riverwash consists of recent sandy, gravelly, or cobbly Top Soil (Typical) alluvium. I t is in areas adjacent to or within stream Underlying Soil Layers (Average) channels and is frequently flooded and redistributed. % Rock Fragments (Average) Restrictive Layer Soil Depth (Average) Drainage Permeability Available Water Capacity ` Rooting Depth k.. Depth i,> Water Table ---- -- --- --- — Incicitncc of Hooding . 3- • . MANAGEMENT INTER ATIONS SOIL NAME Udi fl uvents, nearly level SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent _ STATE SOIL SYMBOLS ,..0.-- '` • � ,'8 00-'` • • •SLOPE STABILITY Natural stable Disturbed stable •ROAD CONSTRUCTION Cut Slope, Fill & Sidecast Hazard N.A. Ballast Requirement low-medium Ballast Suitability N.A.-good* •TIMBER HARVEST Logging System Limitation C Compaction Potential (Moist) moderate high Displacement Potential (Dry/Moist) medium Puddling Potential (Wet) high Erosion Potential low Rockiness Limitation N.A. •SITE PREPARATION Scarification Damage severe Prescribed Burning Damage Potential medium • REGENERATION Drought Potential medium Plant Competition severe Water Table & Flooding Hazard moderate Frost Action Damage Potential N.A. ( Windtlirow Potential medium c______, ns . tit Ili 1U' :-.4 c, i 5x 11111 . a °rr I. . i. 7 , 1 __.__ __ _ r ♦ _ I "'4 • ' ' '' HARACTERISTICS • SOIL NAME Udifluvents, nearly level SLOPE PHASE 0 to 2 percent STATE SOIL SYMBOLS 8500 j Major Tree Species red alder Site Index RA-118 . % Stocking (East. Washington) Landform low river terraces and floodplains Slope Shape simple, nearly level • ( Parent Material recent alluvium Elevation Range 10 to 500 feet Precipitation Range 90 to 130 inches Organic Layer Thickness 1 to 2 inches Top Soil (Typical) very dark grayish brown silt loam Underlying Soil Layers (Average) very dark gray sand % Rock Fragments (Average) 0 to 70 percent hard rounded pebbles and cobbles Restrictive Layer coarsetextured substratum Soil Depth (Average) greater than 60 inches I7ra;nage somewhat excessively drained Permeability moderately rapid to rapid _ Available Water Capacity. Ayioirally_low, fr_equently_'eplenished C.— !tooting Depth 20 to 40 inches or more t' i h`i't l' i`' tv;,ter 'fable oeneral�_no water table within 60 inches Incidence of Hooding - oc_asioul brief flooding, December through March i .ws A . , . 14 i w 11 1 i • 0 TO • a ss • \"" r s.• V •r M r^1 03 mm\..) 0 I , to V •r O V`• tiktdoi • , O / � O 0© N N 11111111111111111611111111:11 s 1. y M V T '0 3 " vY O u 1 '1 1 1 Pi I i il 8 1,,,. :: • • • III Y•p .3 iliell WIPIF Vr - ►y M zs Y • iy itl 0 -P• ;11 iki‘4;1011,41thi: • MY wy • Rr V t .-.S iti 4Ilkit VT.v 0 % 1 w ill V ..__ • S22S S J e •j r a s 1 w o 1� YV Y f0 » Yr g. :V 0 i 9 N 1 Vi u I c' Ul w V. I.ti b • 'l r� 4J � V V V 1 w•P ibb I 1 (( r. 1 B i 1 ....% ....4p, • ,• ,..,,,,ppr. ...,7 -....4„.r. D, z- ■'/, „4....,4.-,,r,' 1,-akt a--,t.1,;-....",..(1.,,.i.e , , „. $,, ,t 2 , . 1 i ii,.Iv, . .. ..,'L ,.. . A.44%,,j11 1,,I I• „ ,i , 4.; r... 4.% c , . ,• -4,--..4, -,, iv... - ..: 1...'s .. i, .$)16,-' -...., -5 ., ...., .• ....- •••• •. ,..., . . --4? A %, 4 ...... .,.. . ). •,,... . , , k - \ . I f• t•;4 :--it-?4,.,-... • •J'' V ;11 . I .. Sr I. ,, ' im i • '-......i.f ....,..,....,-.. '.,-. . • r..tp, , ,.. •- .--0.' 71r. . -; , . ..,..., . . .1 I 4 .it .• .' .1 tf: ' e., .1.0111E.....,. ... . .•:,. ./0.4&• I 4-• ,,,,,, , ) •11•4 ...•i•,.4• ' .1' a -" .1011, . 7 ' F.I" 4 "1.0 e. VI ..• a ' a I, •■ 1......• . a . , "1 14.14...•._ %. .4 t(r. -,•jr•- .. -' . .rteritlilt bt .AA' 44,1 ..de, ...-c.e...,fr ' •7,•• , • t 7"-,, ( . -0 . 4 3 0-JA7 • ..1' • . - 1. --/ I •• ; .44. ,, / . ', 4°.'' 1; ,....) "...lir' ,..:. . v. • .4-. .4 . ,,,..,.., . • .• /...:• • • ise. •.'1/44 . lc . ,.ii.11„.•.44.1.%, -,. , I( / .41ra :-.,,,•-,, is' t ' • t dt ;,..i . . ''' • .v01'. • • .0 4 s*144,F qt4#1 °,'''.." ?! 7'll'iSs ,, , i rf ,..,lo l• 7e :•.f., tr 0 1. A,t';',.) •• '.-, .140••• '‘. ... 144).. .e„,,,L..:•‘?";,:i ' I: ''- .-"•(•::••••,,P. • ,1 t. • '' ',1 - ••.' ' ...' ''''' I' I 114 I . /e,.."! . %,..ra....11V,41141,:,ir , I O1t.o...."':'.6 ''• :.* c \ 1•1 . • f• -1;-• --t-7.,‘ • . . , 1)4.' ..*-,•„:14:.:' ,,"..e4.!1,.... - .4 .,. .i.,sy, • . . ,. Vt., v k • ),,:o t) WI ,,,v, .. •.. ■‘,./.... .... '.•,` 1° 1 ev- _...1` • 1•., .., ; -Ards 4, -ti ..... • - f e I• 6,... • .'T •"-. - ' 1 - '• P 0.,..r.....-.- ,'. .4 ..;4. •■••• '1'" • •'"-.. err' -''.L1" ,s iLt-:.1) 1- 4, .!'It .1 .1 - 5- ' .,"tot •• deft;tilf iiiiitiite. iliiii&rfr. ''• .14. I ... .. /. .:4,, „.,,,,, r, ,,,.. .., 4,1, . -,..c ....„.. 1„.- -e• .. . . .. -1• . .i.g.e.--.... •s • i 4 -... . •,. ,..„.„. ,„.. „ ' ' li.' .ic•;:3L eetiPts,l; " J. A 71tAist a. .0114. „ eit .0). • '-ft . , ,‘A•.'-.'• .: '.4 ; .... ' '°•' 0 - tfr4 '" .- ' . . -. % ir.q. : , , e r A I ..' ' '• W ,16 t- - ' ,.- ,,- It.._,..t. ..,..-, . ,- -.:, .:.“-- . • ... • 1.. . -% 4 CA ,,-i •I • °, i.,.-,, ••• .1_46""'9/..c..1- k%1, • A. ., ., - - ',..2„ ,... ... ,,,,•;, - - -4:-•.,,,,-,1',„. ,41.,.. /•-„, . - 7., ', ;. ' ,,-.,."' •`0, • ••"-,....-.>t• ' blip'- '..,:,-./. t • t , S''. .•1 Vt. ''''t : ,••••••ri ,..S,• :lir if.!.* 10111 - , tot"' •• :„.-.1.AN'. ''....,". a■,•1. - r IA;It"..):-. ...ol III'', • & ."*. ..P. Ca 41 '5,k.1 7.v.,r. -'.---",.4., -• ,-,.,.I .5).A f ' •,,. --.);-1- ,,,..• . a,. -.., f- , . ,,,,:, 4 ...,,,,a.........v......,,,,,,,,r. ...i.... .,v 0 ,it 01.4%; s 1• .„,„r..,d, ...apr,_. ,. ,..4 , 4 •• * g t ii*Allirle... • -• ,- -- ....• {. • ,.. - ...i'... .-t-N„g',''.•,,,.,... t'. ' ', . l':, • 1:. t. s, 4. .,, , ,r:: ,' .4'i•4 _ ' '' ■. ..)'" -4 ..44, •• . - -.4t -- (-- ..< 4.',:- •'.•`-31•0 i' ' !• • ' ." gr,f. • .. il. :...1.ysit • ' ' / • f ' •• ' 4 l . 1 ••,-.- --J - ,:---,--,.' :'J.-. . ) .,..... 71k ...16‘. .,. I -•-,---.:---4 ;• - • qt.,:olikti (.., , 'N. .-'•-:.`i v ..,....• iipt........ -- -------- • • "fr 4,‘ • „ .= •■•••.•• Ai: ...I 1 ' ..i... r''...V.. -471, ,. b.4 ... \ , . 1 4 ,.,,.., . , ire.t•44"0--,,, ..;•...r •,..,-,,r..;4./,.,.4...i.,,:g. :,-:.,.-•-•..r" - , -- . ... i.•"if.' 1. 1,* '•,'Ave, ,:j",.`..1 17-- ,.-"' V., .... * ' .. •_ ••' • ...•-•• r "t}t* th . , • 1" . Ilt. • "= ' ' _„' ,. j r 4 , •... , . •. a....r,......,, ... „.....,.., ...,,,, . ...... i''' i li ..... -..6. . f ..I 4.• :....,ef...,..,r , .-:-:. ii--,-- N . i . ...;,.. ^„ --.1- >' '• ■7 ,. 4. • , . 4.; ' r:g-•• 'r . .• ' • ,4 St 1-•..4%• ,..:,.154... . ,'4i., .it „al: 4.11.4.1•!1::,:::::--'17:H4':::::,'1:471--"::174...-3.1----7.1";*:'''':,'-'::E:tC7:'57d..41:11.::;)*:-.::::71..-:::::1...1:11""::-I.:::N'..-(*.lkl-r:I.i'' • ks;ti Ni .. ..'f:)•, 1 v ?v , . ... leul,t,'-‘f Its q At, ,.., .. 4...."•, . siv 11, . ._ ,ilt-..;„ .4.P1-4 „•: .,‘. r,.1,•, : , :,1,‘. : it • _ .,-...„.....,, ... _-, , ,...,..-...„ .„.. . . , sia z. .._...., • UFA y Niblk - , ) ,.,, ', • ...71,1 • '''' „„A-,i';X.1. %. ` i'. VA '. '4.•••••,•,..9:1N4 A c 1 ..1.04410vt ‘ : -1.,' ,-.;.'"11:1.,4-,..r-I'''::' .-- - ! -.A.,-- r 3 '1. • r At". +1 ..- _ 1 j,.4. , ..... t. ..... ■. . ''... ' " N. • - X41.44111,492r- :- f.f.,1: ...,T, .• . .71 *et . ? - - ' A‘ Nf.:40•Nt- Ail a 4.1#44-1,- _,,,.. -.8 - , ? , ....., ,. , .....1, .-,•:•21N.,4,,..../.,,... .__:, ? - ' \ •I' „ ‘.‘ ,/,. 0.4., Art *v.- 4. , )"..; :" 41.... f .,, • , A; _ix- et-A, •:::_, • -t.-.4 c..,ty...., -iiiii, . 5f,•-• ..)*•..., - -, ' ' " . 11sva *IA 1%. i , -,,t, ..,i,,; •.'i,..0,:',•%,;!,,_ 4,.,,,,,,....:..f. . . ...-1,0- '', -ii...,. -- C ---,,,,,,...., •.. ••••. -. >. . - -,--.- ,, --,. --,A,Awx.-.:•:•.- -D .4, Jk 4., 4.1,4104. • ! * .0 4 ••,,.':, . -... i.„. ...." -; ., lc is- t .-1''' r,,4,, . ,i .... . ,a. , =, -0 d.,./.,:••'... ,44=. 1 ..c.•-•-=:r1v-•p °:"..- ' . e7 .' -'1"•'3,--;,. ..iejf*-•,, . . • . _14-.- /..- -• - r J. .k - --,•-;f5-, i. ,-,....-c.„.'k=- ••' •,:e" '''' \--:e. • % ' ••:,....• ' 4,- :,y,''',X,,., "Iy. 6?-‘,........ -•L 9jitc-■--i• -.. 9-.....-Ar ...,. .,-. 1,14A- 4 ''''''''''' *. .,4A , . „.. _ ....,‘ ... .....,„„!.... L‘r.:••••: •-•• -". .4 alai: „:..." '''''■ - •,,,.. , ,vt.:= , :4,1, •.6.4 ;.‘,:..-4:,..*: 4_,,,.1.7',...f,,,.....4. 1`iirtl.. '.44,,,,,'••"*.: "•••,•4,....e1:0, 7 ...., ....1.017, -, i I l'' • . ..*t.. 7.ft,,-_ r.- .wr,- ' - • . . - ''''"."••■ ' '... . •. -'A''';;C: •,t...'.-..'.,:;---.-..-Z. . ..,...---44,.,N.-„1:„4.,&4:,N„.:..-4:-..{3.:::-:--.„!:.,,.1„,I-..-.-.;--.--.•,.•.-%.L:..-1,.;-.f&-,,.4,-.-r..4.,7--:.C-IA,.,N,,t 4.-'k..4:„:-•......,.c,_4..„o-".1',,t'_,.-.-,-,-.„„„„, -,-..,.,'..,..,.-4. .•••.., ‘• -$••\•47\1''-'--'- -■- /• .. ,,,,*` '.-..'1.1„-*•!'..-.,,-,•.4 0.1.4'r,-.-1'-1§•.-,'v. •rl*4-''f'•--•..•f.:-.'3'.'„-'-f 49 -"-„'4p 4,a-.2•••,',"•-,.',o•,1,"..1.P .,_7.":.*-_t.-.:"1 4-",e,,„-4•*-..c.••''-',•r..`i,,,'-"r•::---,r_...!-.,•._.,.44,1, 04,-.."4."e.::.'-3.,$-5,-1--.`..-.,:.,...:..-,.:.-4.."6g.6..•,'.'-.,'...i-..,,..,, ;- ',4:: • .' - --v c it, -...4 .."- .- . ',A-4::f••.- -'"`','" - ,,,,,-;-• z- . - - .'. .'.--;,'•`• -- ` .•''' ' .'_1- 4;-- . ., • • '''.%,... •••• ...v• - ..., 1$4, ',1„, e = .-,„ 'v, ;INA,' --., sc. ' "r".! , " , .6 . "se• • ••,•b'et.4..: 1 1.Se' ' Ur ito.rt' •••,„ sr„:".,-.At ,,•- ....-r -, -.- „;,- `,-..'4.t,e, . : •:,„,...r....- ' ..e. -.r,..-. -•., ., .:•;,...... . -,-, • ..26 . . ..-. -, - . ..„, jp•Ine. ,'"s'... .. ..,:e; 11..):•1..•••• ,rt.-',....'-fil..4't.,,,L(.. ate. ',1•••-reil'e,74.. ;.- • - Ni--- 'nil% • - -„,,e•-f_- • - ......, . Or . .' *.4... ;,S:r.4' .. .:. 4C4C :-...1 ' '' ..(''..Z`ftf;J: .‘.•;- **... • •••••:-t 'Z P. "„., ..- , .•. •••••••„-silt, .?1.`„;--'-.-211& -,'-,,I. .. --- - , '4-1'T_, . i ...... . .---4° ..-$.- •• '..,::.,-')... ; ,Tf... ---,Fr.,• ' - *- ... ;;-`','` --; •-• '-1"-z - A-4..;••••••./.--7.i. • _ .n,, ii -.14r„ , 4./ c ,L.... :**-4.,', .. . i44•46..' '41.4! v•, 0.._,:t! •:„1 ,,- .-- 4• ...-r.--+.1, " ,.... ' ,c'e,.1: `s.• , /I..„„ „..„*. 4-. Jr-N..,,- _ -: 111.%--,4 r.'1,..:.;--•. - 0, ..... ,,- 4.4.. s'Ir7?"1-•••-..• -',7:`•••';: '''. . . •••4.1.■ W'','... .1.,r.f. ''Zi:4 a • • ''' .. ..,'7.....-••••''' 1, ...1.. ■••r--...„....1. .yolig.,,,,,,-, . , ,,,it-,If srtf..- ,,...... _ . ,•• -vp„.•■■••-•.. ..• - '',P-P•0'. .-•-to, •• ••- ,r, • - ••,0., , - - -- #1....lip"., • ...„ . .A,. .:,,t,„ ........4. ' '''..i,""•Vr.■ -0-44/. '' - le '1-4,i -„T. ...-.Jr_-ri...0.••e,.Y. 1-- -.',--;;•-kr • , --- 1 Al ' -- . '--1,.:'1 .4„t71 - • •,se,,t*--, t'. '1• • r• ''.÷cti.•7f.••••*.1.- •,,,„4, - -..---- .,..".,,,..r•-z--------- -1---01.4,4"---;. :-Ati)...-. ., • -,v-..,-. _..•-••• •-•,, -.5*;..17- ' 4. - f.v...,!,-. A*., ‘414,.. % .,. .}-P-' A-'..;...•--4,.-;.. 7 '44;-1 '?....r'4"4„f'..* ',r.-4.#.....f.4.-1.4''...1:.,!;..!■,14‘.e..0- /.... ...1 . .- - ...leprv-, '.-IL: .t.. :-.--- ..," ', AV V- .,-.• ..-..„...4.:.:-.X* .4 at' .l.J.41- 'A'..'• - •.• J:,,,,... ',-,,,A". - a - • ......,1%-.. • • 1... •-a.. • : - ,,, . ...,..,,,. 4•.:•,,,,...,„, r/,l'4,...-„••%t,,-.„... ....(,,,„, , ,.:4.„.- . ,. .....,344r,,,,,• s-- 4„ ,..,..5 „.„ ,t ,,,. ..,,r,, ......• a 4. , „... 4 . ';'• '1.5:1'''•;r;Ir '..`''. ....••••rt. ''I;. 1, ,1,. ....**•''.. 'St- 1--4., , ' + - ',. .....1,...* -*••-,...-1- -46,., -,-.. . 4„,.., 46-: „Kr...)...,:.„,y •y., ••,.. • 4.„...,-- .. ....,...:-___„- ..3.- .; •-: - - ,...........- •..4 -.• -_-...„...1), ..--„,..-,,,-,...,...-••••• - ... , , .„...,,,..• :-.. - ... , . . • ...„ - • - • 4...._- ..., ...,.-.. - , , .......-,..--,_ - .....,......--.4.r -497 -1.41-.....=, = ... - -t-- .--..- ,..-44.•?;-.-1.......;e:: --. - , • •. -0 - .11.1.,-..ir,i-ot:Aer, ....,- 4. #_. . -... .."-et- -.4:4=1-:-....,,_.,-,.....4,,,: -. ..,t-,,,,,,,,....,,....-,-,..- t. ,.,..., „...,,, ..-,....i.,„:..-,i.,7*....t.„.,..,-• ,:j r"..,....*: . .„ 1 A.., ' ,. ..;A' „.‘ .; st,,_ I- ' r --t,•' , . ,,,, „,, ..,-:'.. - •tisi;...4.0.• , 7'''''....41;1-T6.,-,1-•_1,;...r----fliti.e.N.r• ...., ...:-:4 '-_...,?`,.?;:r ••-, - 40.• ...,4,-.:,. . ....: - ' ....-- - j.,4.: „, „ -e •• •r", ._ Jr; ,•,-r„,./r..4-4^ -•.• 7,-/-„::.' •••:-. - ...' .,...4•1 .r.% VA.-14.....%., '7.'.'N -1"-‘,- ... V....A• --1e- ..... '`'' .. -, - •- ,A., 1;1; ....-.:'•• --;4„:r...... 4k ... :.t..AI....... ,t, ,,,f4.,.... ... ir. ,d. If ...„, --,- ,... :-_, , s... . -,4.-...: :..4- ,,=.,- -.I.Ais., 4. .4 ,,-= f... -t2...-.44 *44441-.- . -4 •`P- 2- ,,„--)k*!--,...--•'-'2.,-tr.-•'-i;--T' ,'-' :41'fr. --.:'-V"? -,- ' ;,..---- - ..*,' 44. .0 ,,.. . er)- •-. Y!•,..• `:,..' .14-;,..--,_4.--,..-:--.4.: ...,,,-,••,---. •,.. ,thbo„---- - cl...,,---s.,,--- -:.:, - --•.-_.,,..il.:.- _Ati..i.,,..4., -..,;:... ., ...ve •-.-;;,.•;„. ,..j, 1-$.4.- -. •,,,e-..-:-..c'l , .• - • - --•..- .. -- .-- _ - 1 • • 4 ,..-.ea...e..."-- ,, ito.4.4.44...are 4.4:zee I C'f."Ce•^2.1 4.1.11041A. .tiAl I t-l-44.4‘-"Ce • 64441C- _ • o. • • _ _... is ii, 740 Oof „d_tec (29- c F-7 xi_...6,0-0.Ateft ,-Ecc - ) 11 , II C -e-- • • . • •. _ , z P : f --- • t).1- (2 ON:5 . . t\ \v F ( i' # a r , +� � - `,�' � dam aw - r � s a � .�'t R ' *.,, 1. d y t a c, r �dsy[ t , ,. A�y�. � .fir.rv;'-'-:',4,4!4-'-..-'. '.-.1'-',-,-*'',_. . '''`--"i-fi-,-ii:--• -. i'r'!„:."'",:.?P,':-.'•:-;;,!,.--..-7.::'-'!:','•-•''-'.-j..---,14;-ff'''',...-`------ 0- '.'''''''''' 85 a b,� .usaum �, 1 ce � �� a -- :�' �, x -.s4� C r `# * , : __, yn a xis '# `‹ - # �• $� h' �� ?c t?i� ; a,• F fi illtitill t co- .d„F' ot4ik, 4) 3 :s_i -' '-,:,i:•---''".'':,-- -Vic,:- '-'• , .' ; -:_ 1"7-7"..,?).W ' •°.''''''' ' - -..-.,,--;,:,-..,0:,::,,,,-:;ii -• Y i„' . - 'u`' tea- . • v �r Ph caph C muffler- Lewes. Roil kkl F €'_. t P. wA q s 4