Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP2013-00033 1 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: M aster#ML A13-00088 Review Type Project Description SDP13-00033 DISCOVERY BAY RESTORATION PROJECT Primary: STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF Site Address: REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 282023 HWY 101 600 CAPITOL WAY N WA, OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 REP NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION KEVIN LONG 205 B W PATISON ST PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 Project Location: Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003,964 516 903,Junction City Blk 160& 169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„ Township 29,Range 2W,Highway 101, SR 20,Fairmount Road,Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend& Sequim. Parcel Number: 902231004 S-T-R: 23-29N-02W Total Acreage 12 Legal Description S23 T29 R2W GOV LOTS 1 &2(E OF SR 101)LESS TAX 4 Land Use: 9100 &26 LS PTN GOV LOT 1 BTWN SR 101 &RR R/W(RR R/W INCL)LESS TAX 34 AND 35 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: •chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902242005 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 3 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TL TAX V(LS SR 101 R/W&TL V-1) Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: •chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902243020 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 1 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TAX 52 SUBJ/REST COVT#521386 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902243044 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 3 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TAX 68(ENLG BY TX 76) SUBJ TO EASE Land Use: 9100 SUBJ TO REST COVT#521386 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902243046 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 12 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TAX 83 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902243048 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 3 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TAX 82 Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 964516003 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 0 Legal Description JUNCTION CITY BLK 160 LOT 7 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: •chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 964516903 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage I Legal Description JUNCTION CITY BLK 169 LOTS 11 & 12(S OF R/W),BLK Land Use: 9100 170 LOTS 1 THRU 10 BLK 179 LOT 12 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans 0)TLA`ifi.A1Z4W: Lk_ P F ,;�t t ;.i +,,,� / [ ] Plot plan states "property line' [ ] Assessor's Map (Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES NO Stream Type:YES NO Fish & Wildlife:YES NO Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NO Seismic: YES NO Landslide: YES NO Flood: YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other f 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building (s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 902243044 1.) Custom Warning Flag As of 1/22/04 the Water Meter for this property has been 4/5/04 removed by Moa Tel Water System Manager per SP Parcel tags found for parcel 902243044 2.) Custom Warning Flag MOATEL DRAINFIELD EASEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY 6/3/11 �5 a Ad ID: 125917 � Pre-Bill roan 226 Adams Street• Port Townsend, WA 98368 • 360-385-2900 Bill to: Sold to: Account ID: 15833 Jodi Adams Kaycee K. Hathaway JeffCo Dept of Community Development JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please pay from this Pre-Bill. Return stub with payment I Rep ID: DR I Terms: Net 30 Description Classification of Ad: 460—County Notices Zone: A PO: MLA13-00088 Text: JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND... Charges from 2/12/2014 to 2/12/2014 Date Pub Type Description Price Discount Applied Due 12/12/14 I PTL lad I LEGALS: JEFFERSON COUNTY- I $73.631 I -$73.631 $0.001 $73.631 -$73.631 $0.00 Please return this our ortion with payment. p y Pre-Bill Remit Payment to: Port Townsend Leader Amount Due $0.00 226 Adams Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-2900 Fax: 360-385-3422 Amount Enclosed Issue Date: 2/12/2014 Jodi Adams Prebill Date: 3/18/2014 JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Ad # 125917 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account# 15833 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) I, Donna J. Rosmaier, an employee of the Port Townsend& Jeffer- son County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has been established, published in the English language and circulated continuously as a weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and State, and for general circulation in said county for more than six (6) months prior to the date of first publication of the Notice hereto attached and that the said Port Townsend& Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said Jefferson County and annexed is a true copy of the Ad#1 l a 5 c I- SEE ATTACHED NEWSPAPER CLIPPING As it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of 1 weekl, beginning on the la day of celyruav‘ , 2014, ending on the IQ day of .e,brup,,iivk , 2014, that said newspaper was regularly distributed to their subscribers during all of this period. That the full amount of$ 13 S.(0 3 has been paid in full, at the rate of$ 7.75 per column inch for each insertion. µO S A9q, Subscribed and sworn to before me this \`. day of • O,A)A 2014. ?+P 01"Y 4%9 I . O ' e.cti 0 00104 z Donna osmaier Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.Residing at Port Townsend. I. OF W Jefferson Count• Public Notices oN F x� www.co jefferscrn.wa.w JEFFERSON GOt1NTY NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING TYPE LAND USE'APPLICATION MLAM3=O0086 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that public heating will be held by the Jeffe(s County Hearings Examiner to review a receive Comments on a Type 111 land U Application. APPLICANT: STATE OF WASHINGTON FISHIWth.F REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N - " OLYMPIA WA 98501-1075"- ;; Ap tcation Received.bete: July 1,"2013 Application Complete bate: August 28,413 Appllcatiott 00*:De February.12,2014 sirE ADDResS.1 PROJECT LOC`ATIQN At Y 1 jisofiffilik :SR 1. Cnneyye//y h& -.PRO *T sd a s REQ #T# }� 1}eod t�v 3 > aia.stie e 5vatertina r I;pt'ote t t Dlecov -1 �` 1'f . at the so8th arid of iJiso(4 ) subjectorevtewur Et * hat'subinitted8geote tr" vea n tetkeation repent f tin eientpFar and Section Tan rte. PUBL1 HEARIt AND,WHIERg-'TO,. VIEW CI MEffi The pibliorhst t j 0*44)41:00A on Februait 36,26t4 Conference, of iii ntj courthouse.,;The head1r g'.,i begin.et o about 2dtOPM. '` The applicaon and..any stu pr may be reviewed at the,le6arsott Ceee > artsent'atCommuniity bev,efoptfreat,.,At interested°person§are;invtted.to tmm= meat ore the apptcaflon fq,feee111e,119000 of end Pefeeipete m any heamtgs1 and..(G) receive a copy of the deoiemn bi submitting such written-oomrnertt(sjkeett e) o;the Jefferson County Oeptt ertt ofCerninunity Development,'Deveioptra nt 1 eee v DMsion. 621 Sheridan Street,Port Tend, WA 98368,(360)379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)ora Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS),parties:of record may appeal the decision to the Fearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision.A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Project Planner: STATE Tr," .. x 118895 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775• (360) 407-6300 March 24,2014 Washington Dept. of Fish And Wildlife Attn: Real Estate Services Division 600 Capitol Way N Olympia, WA 98501 Re: Jefferson County Permit SDP13-00033 -Approved WA Dept. Of Fish And Wildlife -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SDP) Greetings: On March 21, 2014,the Department of Ecology received notice that Jefferson County approved your application for an SDP. Your permit is for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement, and Olympic discovery trail construction within shoreline jurisdiction of Discovery Bay. By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with: • The Shoreline Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCW) • Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria(Chapter 173-27-150 WAC) • The Jefferson County Local Shoreline Master Program. Local governments, after reviewing SDPs for compliance, are required to submit them to Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit,the law requires you wait at least 21 days from March 21,2014,the"date of filing.", This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who disagrees with any aspect of this permit to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend that you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure that no appeal has been received. They can be reached at(360) 664-9160 or http://www.eho.wa.gov/. If you want to appeal this decision,you can find appeal instructions(Chapter 461-08 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac. Other federal, state,and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit. If you have any questions about this letter,please contact me at(360) 407-6221. .4l (/V Rick Mraz, Shorelipe-Spe 'alist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program cc: Donna Frostholm,Jefferson County Kevin Long,North Olympic Salmon Coalition ECEUVIED MAR 20 2014 MEMORANDUM JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Parties of Record FROM: Stephen K. Causseaux, Jr. Jefferson County Hearing Examine DATE: March 18, 2014 RE: Shoreline Substantial Development for a Conditional Use and Secondary Use Application (and a Primary Use Application) MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 North Olympic Salmon Coalition In the Decision of March 6, 2014, approving the applicant's request for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Shoreline Conditional Use and Secondary Use Application the Examiner imposed Condition 19 that reads: 19. The applicant and Jefferson County Public Works shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control. Jefferson County Public Work advises that its jurisdiction is limited to the trail construction portion of the project so that it may not need to coordinate traffic control along U.S. Highway 101. Public Works advises that those agencies responsible for waterline relocation and restoration work will provide traffic control when necessary. However, such agencies are not subject to conditions of approval. The Examiner has therefore rewritten Condition 19 to read as follows: 19. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the trail construction portion of the project, if required. The applicant shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. The applicant will also coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control and are not within the jurisdiction of Jefferson County Public Works. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE III LAND USE PERMIT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT(RCW 90.58) PROPONENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 DATE ISSUED: March 18, 2014 DATE EXPIRES: March 18, 2016 MLA#:MLA13-00088 CASE NUMBER: SDP13-00033 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: DISCOVERY BAY SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: YES SHORELINE DESIGNATION: Nal Ural, Cen ervet ., Ott i vh. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1.) The applicant shall comply with the following conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle,a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360)457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures, they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Waterlines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the waterline replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project#13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1)year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100ml enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System#07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. 19. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the trail construction portion of the project, if required. The applicant shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. The applicant will also coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control and are not within the jurisdiction of Jefferson County Public Works. 20. The applicant will work with Kurt Jafay to provide low growth plantings along the shoreline in front of his parcels such that the current views of Discovery Bay are maintained. NOTICE: This permit may be rescinded by Jefferson County or the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon finding that the permittee has not complied with the conditions herein, pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8). The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensue from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58.230. Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is it authorized until twenty-one (21)days from the date of filing as defined in WAC 173-27-130 or until all review proceedings initiated within twenty-one days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2)years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted development shall be accomplished within five (5)years from the date of this permit. APPEALS: RCW 90.58.180 Appeals for Shoreline Permits Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 may, except as otherwise provided in chapter 43.21 L RCW, seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a petition for review within twenty-one days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6). • (( y De rt ent of Community Development Staff c: Rick Marz, DOE, Shorelands Office WA State Attorney General �w4soN �o� JEFFERSON COUNTY ti ;1'' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT K6iiiirdhai. 621 Sheridan Street 1 Port Townsend,WA 98368 1 Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelopment o Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcd@cp.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review 1 Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center March 18, 2014 Permit Coordinator Washington Department of Ecology, Shorelands PO Box 47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Dear Permit Coordinator: SUBJECT: SHORELINE SDP PERMIT MATERIALS ENCLOSED. MLA#: MLA13-00088 CASE#: SDP13-00033 Enclosed are documents in reference to the subject permit. A check next to a document in the list below indicates that it is included in the packet. ✓Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter. \/ SDP and/or other permit(s) issued by Jefferson County. Date: 3 i g °t 4 SDP and/or other permit denial(s). Date: -1 ✓ Hearing Examiner Findings, Conclusions and Final Decision. Date: 3 c' - 14 Staff Report to Hearing Examiner or Shoreline Administrator. Date: Z -►3 --/mil SEPA final threshold determination. Date: /- Zz— ,`-i- _SEPA staff memorandum to Responsible Official. Date: _WDFW Hydraulic Project Approval. Date: Other permits/approvals from other agencies or Jefferson County: Case Log Sheet. JARPA. _Plan view. _Cross-sectional._ Other plan/design: Site map. I other: C Y1s75 Ex/1 iii 1`Merr 14 gill er1r01r 1 ►e,2i)1 it Please contact the Project Planner via telephone or email to confirm receipt of these materials or if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, NhAk_a ,2-----Th Project Plann c: File Office of the Attorney General j \\tidemark\data\forms\F_SDP_Approval_U.rpt 3/18/2014 Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: Jefferson County To: Permit Coordinator Department of Community Development Washington Department of Ecology, Shorelands 621 Sheridan Street PO Box 47775 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Date of Transmittal: March 18, 2014 Date of Receipt: Type of Permit:Shore(' i, U b� �ti 4-;o MLA#: MLA13-00088 Case#: SDP13-00033 Local Government Decision: Approval_ Conditional Approval ✓ Denial_ Applicant: Representative: STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV KEVIN LONG 600 CAPITOL WAY N 205 B W PATISON ST OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 360-480-7723 (360) 379-8051 Is the applicant the property owner? N Location of Property: Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. Waterbody Name: DISCOVERY BAY Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Y Environment Designation: CoA5eiNcx\c,tl; r i,, b 19--r\CA " Description of the Project: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. Notice of Application Date: Final Decision Date: March 18, 2014 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE III LAND USE PERMIT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT(RCW 90.58) PROPONENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISHNVDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 DATE ISSUED: March 18, 2014 DATE EXPIRES: March 18, 2016 MLA#:MLA13-00088 CASE NUMBER: SDP13-00033 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: DISCOVERY BAY SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: YES SHORELINE DESIGNATION: /JaAW'zi/, (,(l!?S'rya n i, u1} vha.44, aaLA FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1.) The applicant shall comply with the following conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360)457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures, they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Waterlines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the waterline replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project#13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System#07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. 19. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the trail construction portion of the project, if required. The applicant shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. The applicant will also coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control and are not within the jurisdiction of Jefferson County Public Works. 20. The applicant will work with Kurt Jafay to provide low growth plantings along the shoreline in front of his parcels such that the current views of Discovery Bay are maintained. NOTICE: This permit may be rescinded by Jefferson County or the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon finding that the permittee has not complied with the conditions herein, pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8). The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensue from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58.230. Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is it authorized until twenty-one (21)days from the date of filing as defined in WAC 173-27-130 or until all review proceedings initiated within twenty-one days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2)years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted development shall be accomplished within five (5)years from the date of this permit. APPEALS: RCW 90.58.180 Appeals for Shoreline Permits Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 may, except as otherwise provided in chapter 43.21 L RCW, seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a petition for review within twenty-one days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6). • S c ! De rt ent of Community Development Staff c: Rick Marz, DOE, Shorelands Office WA State Attorney General i 'i� lEOEO V E } 1 1 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ( I �, MAR 1 1 2014 JEFFERSON COUNTY a 13I JEFFERSON COUNTY REPORT AND DECISION DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CASE NO.: Shoreline Substantial Development for a Conditional Use and a Secondary Use Application (and a Primary Use Application) MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 OWNERS: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Real Estate Services Division 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation-Olympic Region 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW, Suite 302 Tumwater, WA 98501 Jefferson Land Trust 1033 Lawrence Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Christopher and Susan Calero 7701-8th Avenue N.W. Seattle, WA 98117 APPLICANT/AGENT: North Olympic Salmon Coalition Attn: Kevin Long 205B West Patison Street Port Hadlock, WA 98339 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and a Section 7 consultation report. SUMMARY OF DECISION: Request granted, subject to conditions. 1X PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Jefferson County Department of Community Development Staff Report and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the request as follows: The hearing was opened on February 25, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. Parties wishing to testify were sworn in by the Examiner. The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows: SEE ATTACHED INDEX LIST DONNA FROSTHOLM appeared, presented the Department of Community Development Staff Report, and testified that the proposed primary use is a trail, but staff has combined all of the proposed uses into one application. Three property owners are included in the application. She has received no comments, but a phone call questioned the relocation of the waterline. The applicant proposes to relocate the waterline and construct a trail. Staff finds that the request meets all requirements. REBECCA BENJAMIN appeared and testified that they have worked on the project for the past ten years. They want to start work on the site in early April. They propose to relocate the waterline in the spring and complete the rest of the work in the summer. She has reviewed the conditions of approval and the Staff Report and agrees with all. She did have a question regarding Condition 17. KURT JAFAY appeared and testified that the project could have an impact on his property. Improvements on his property include a restaurant and rail cars and he has a tenant. He has concerns regarding locating the property lines. He also has concerns regarding whether the County intends to take portions of his property for the trail. He supports restoration of the bay but is sorry that the proposal will remove the railroad grade. It now provides a nice trail for the public to view Discovery Bay. He had questions regarding the waterline relocation as far as costs and impacts to him. He hopes they can provide a seamless connection. He wants to ensure that he will not pay any of the relocation costs and that the discount reconnection to the new line will occur immediately. He would suffer financial impacts if the project does not occur in the way described by the applicant. The trail will not impact his property, and the aerial photograph shows no impact. He just wants assurance of that fact. He has concerns regarding planting of trees along the water. Trees would impact public use of the shoreline and views of the bay. He wants to keep his restaurant deck and train cars open for views of the bay by his customers. He supports the trail. MS. BENJAMIN reappeared and testified that they will planting along the shoreline but will 2X work with Mr. Jafay and will likely plant low growing shrubs to preserve the views from his property. At present she does not know the current situation with the water connection and does not want to provide erroneous information. ERIC KUZMA, Jefferson County Public Works, appeared and testified that he has discussed project issues with the property owner. The County vacated right-of-way to Mr. Jafay in 1992. A 2004 survey shows Mr. Jafay's parcel in its entirety to include the vacated right-of- way. The trail will avoid the property as shown on the survey. He will work with DOT and Mr. Jafay regarding traffic control during construction. No one spoke further in this matter and the Examiner took the matter under advisement. The hearing was concluded at 2:40 p.m. NOTE: A complete record of this hearing is available in the office of Jefferson County Department of Community Development. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION: FINDINGS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The proposal is subject to review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The Jefferson County responsible official issued a Threshold Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on January 22, 2014. No appeals were filed. 3. Proposal Noticing: Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: Notice of Type Ill Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23, 2013 (Exhibits 21 and 23) Notice of Public Hearing: February 12, 2014 (Exhibit 55) Notice was posted on the property: Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23, 2013 (Exhibits 21 and 22) Notice of Public Hearing: February 12, 2014 (Exhibits 55 and 56) The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: 3X Notice of Type Ill Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 22, 2013 (Exhibit 21) Notice of Public Hearing: February 11, 2014 (Exhibit 55) 4. The applicant, North Olympic Salmon Coalition, has applied for a shoreline substantial development permit for a conditional use and for a secondary use to allow a restoration project for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek. The project site is located at the south end of Discovery Bay adjacent to U.S. Highway 101 and SR-20. The project includes removal of an abandoned railroad grade constructed through former tideflats and the restoration of the natural beach profile. The project also includes removal of fill from the mouths of four small streams that flow into Discovery Bay within the project area and removal of a creosote, timber, railroad trestle. The applicant also proposes to remove a nonfunctional culvert with tide gates; 1,700 lineal feet of railroad grade; three railroad trestle bridges; sidecast dredge spoils; and a delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek. The restoration project will require relocating a waterline within the railroad grade into road rights-of-way. The project also includes the extension of a culvert to a non-fish bearing stream on U.S. 101 and constructing a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the new waterline alignment. Finally, the applicant will bridge two, fish bearing stream mouths with box culverts. 5. The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP). The SMMP designates the shoreline area south of the railroad grade as suburban and waterward of the railroad grade as natural and conservancy. Restoration work will also occur in the aquatic designation. The SMMP considers restoration of marine habitats in all shoreline designations as an unclassified use, and such activities require a shoreline conditional use permit. While the County can administratively permit construction of a trail within the suburban shoreline designation, the applicant has applied to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively rather than individually. Thus, trail construction is included within the conditional use permitting process. 6. The applicant submitted a completed application for a shoreline substantial development permit that the County deemed complete on July 1, 2013. The Jefferson County responsible official issued a DNS following SEPA review on January 22, 2014, and received no appeals. 7. According to aerial photographs, the major portions of the project will occur waterward of the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay. Such activities will include removal of the railroad grade and trestles as well as removal of the waterline located within said improvements. The applicant will relocate the waterline beneath U.S. 101 and SR-20. The project also includes plantings along the shoreline and along the Olympic Discovery Trail. 8. Mr. Kurt Jafay owns parcels of property between U.S. 101 and Discovery Bay 4X within the project area. Waterline replacement will occur in U.S. 101 across the frontage of Mr. Jafay's property. The Olympic Discovery Trail will also be located adjacent to said parcels. Mr. Jafay appeared at the hearing and expressed concerns regarding the impact of the project on his business and tenants and whether the applicant would need to acquire portions of his property. Testimony at the hearing confirmed the following: A. The waterline relocation will occur at no cost to Mr. Jafay. B. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate the construction activities within U.S. 101 with Mr. Jafay (timing and traffic control). C. Jefferson County and the applicant will assure to best of their abilities a seamless disconnection of the present waterline and reconnection of the new line. The goal is to assume no adverse impacts on the commercial uses located on Mr. Jafay's parcel. D. The trail will not encroach onto Mr. Jafay's property as confirmed by the County's survey. The project will not require purchase of any portion of Mr. Jafay's property. E. The applicant will coordinate plantings along the shoreline in front of Mr. Jafay's property to maintain his present, open view of Discovery Bay. 9. The Findings and Conclusions set forth on Pages 5-15 of the Jefferson County Department of Community Development Staff Report (Log item 58) are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. The proposed restoration project, waterline relocation, and trail construction satisfies all criteria set forth in the SMMP subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 5X 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures, they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Waterlines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the waterline replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the 6X existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System #07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. 19. The applicant and Jefferson County Public Works shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control. 20. The applicant will work with Kurt Jafay to provide low growth plantings along the shoreline in front of his parcels such that the current views of Discovery Bay are maintained. DECISION: The request for a shoreline substantial development permit for a conditional use and a secondary use application to allow the Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, a waterline replacement project, and construction of the Olympic Discovery Trail project along U.S. 101 and SR-20 at the south end of Discovery Bay is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2014. S '' E K. CAUSSEAUX, R. Hearing Examiner 7X �4501'1 co JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment o" Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcd(a.cojefferson.wa.us 4-4 447":4-'-o" I I J Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center March 18, 2014 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV _ 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 Re: MLA#MLA13-00088 Case#SDP13-00033 Your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit was approved by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on March 18, 2014. Your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit was approved by the Jefferson County Shoreline Administrator on March 18, 2014. The permit and supporting documentation will now be forwarded to the Washington State Department of Ecology(DOE)for filing. Construction pursuant to this permit may not begin, nor is it authorized, until twenty-one (21) days from the date of filing with DOE as defined in RCW 90.58.140(5)(6) and WAC 173-14-090, or until all review proceedings initiated within twenty-one days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5a-c). You will receive notification from DOE of the filing date and the date construction may begin. If you have any questions, please contact the Department of Community Development at(360) 379-4450 or Rick Mraz, Jefferson County's regional contact at DOE, at(360)407-6521. Sincerely, 1,&NUL-a- Department of C unity Development Staff \\tidemark\data\forms\F_SDP_Approval_U.rpt 3/18/2014 j Donna Frostholm From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:11 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Kevin Long Subject: FW: Memo Attachments: 3-18-14 memo to POR (North Olympic).doc The revised condition#19 has been revised appropriately. Thank you for taking care of this. -Eric Eric Kuzma,Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma(a�cojefferson.wa.us Web: www.cojefferson.wa..us/publicworks From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:02 AM To: Eric Kuzma Subject: FW: Memo Revision from the hearing examiner attached. From: J. Pelesky [mailto:j.peleskvmchlawoffices.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 8:14 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp; Donna Frostholm Subject: Memo Here is a Memo for North Olympic Salmon Coalition. The original is in the mail to you. Thanks! JeyJ. Pele4icy Legal Assistant to Stephen K.Causseaux,Jr. Hearing Examiner 902 South loth Street Tacoma,Washington 98405 (253)272-2206 j.peleskyO mchlawoffices.com 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Parties of Record FROM: Stephen K. Causseaux, Jr. Jefferson County Hearing Examiner DATE: March 18, 2014 RE: Shoreline Substantial Development for a Conditional Use and Secondary Use Application (and a Primary Use Application) MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 North Olympic Salmon Coalition In the Decision of March 6, 2014, approving the applicant's request for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Shoreline Conditional Use and Secondary Use Application the Examiner imposed Condition 19 that reads: 19. The applicant and Jefferson County Public Works shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control. Jefferson County Public Work advises that its jurisdiction is limited to the trail construction portion of the project so that it may not need to coordinate traffic control along U.S. Highway 101. Public Works advises that those agencies responsible for waterline relocation and restoration work will provide traffic control when necessary. However, such agencies are not subject to conditions of approval. The Examiner has therefore rewritten Condition 19 to read as follows: 19. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the trail construction portion of the project, if required. The applicant shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. The applicant will also coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control and are not within the jurisdiction of Jefferson County Public Works. E 01E [I E OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ,, MAR 1 1 2014 JEFFERSON COUNTY a Li JEFFERSON COUNTY REPORT AND DECISION DEPT.OF COMM;UNITY OEVFIOPMENT CASE NO.: Shoreline Substantial Development for a Conditional Use and a Secondary Use Application (and a Primary Use Application) MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 OWNERS: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Real Estate Services Division 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation-Olympic Region 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW, Suite 302 Tumwater, WA 98501 Jefferson Land Trust 1033 Lawrence Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Christopher and Susan Calero 7701-8th Avenue N.W. Seattle, WA 98117 APPLICANT/AGENT: North Olympic Salmon Coalition Attn: Kevin Long 205B West Patison Street Port Hadlock, WA 98339 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and a Section 7 consultation report. SUMMARY OF DECISION: Request granted, subject to conditions. 1X PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Jefferson County Department of Community Development Staff Report and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the request as follows: The hearing was opened on February 25, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. Parties wishing to testify were sworn in by the Examiner. The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows: SEE ATTACHED INDEX LIST DONNA FROSTHOLM appeared, presented the Department of Community Development Staff Report, and testified that the proposed primary use is a trail, but staff has combined all of the proposed uses into one application. Three property owners are included in the application. She has received no comments, but a phone call questioned the relocation of the waterline. The applicant proposes to relocate the waterline and construct a trail. Staff finds that the request meets all requirements. REBECCA BENJAMIN appeared and testified that they have worked on the project for the past ten years. They want to start work on the site in early April. They propose to relocate the waterline in the spring and complete the rest of the work in the summer. She has reviewed the conditions of approval and the Staff Report and agrees with all. She did have a question regarding Condition 17. KURT JAFAY appeared and testified that the project could have an impact on his property. Improvements on his property include a restaurant and rail cars and he has a tenant. He has concerns regarding locating the property lines. He also has concerns regarding whether the County intends to take portions of his property for the trail. He supports restoration of the bay but is sorry that the proposal will remove the railroad grade. It now provides a nice trail for the public to view Discovery Bay. He had questions regarding the waterline relocation as far as costs and impacts to him. He hopes they can provide a seamless connection. He wants to ensure that he will not pay any of the relocation costs and that the discount reconnection to the new line will occur immediately. He would suffer financial impacts if the project does not occur in the way described by the applicant. The trail will not impact his property, and the aerial photograph shows no impact. He just wants assurance of that fact. He has concerns regarding planting of trees along the water. Trees would impact public use of the shoreline and views of the bay. He wants to keep his restaurant deck and train cars open for views of the bay by his customers. He supports the trail. MS. BENJAMIN reappeared and testified that they will planting along the shoreline but will 2X work with Mr. Jafay and will likely plant low growing shrubs to preserve the views from his property. At present she does not know the current situation with the water connection and does not want to provide erroneous information. ERIC KUZMA, Jefferson County Public Works, appeared and testified that he has discussed project issues with the property owner. The County vacated right-of-way to Mr. Jafay in 1992. A 2004 survey shows Mr. Jafay's parcel in its entirety to include the vacated right-of- way. The trail will avoid the property as shown on the survey. He will work with DOT and Mr. Jafay regarding traffic control during construction. No one spoke further in this matter and the Examiner took the matter under advisement. The hearing was concluded at 2:40 p.m. NOTE: A complete record of this hearing is available in the office of Jefferson County Department of Community Development. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION: FINDINGS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The proposal is subject to review pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The Jefferson County responsible official issued a Threshold Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on January 22, 2014. No appeals were filed. 3. Proposal Noticing: Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23, 2013 (Exhibits 21 and 23) Notice of Public Hearing: February 12, 2014 (Exhibit 55) Notice was posted on the property: Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23, 2013 (Exhibits 21 and 22) Notice of Public Hearing: February 12, 2014 (Exhibits 55 and 56) The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: 3X Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 22, 2013 (Exhibit 21) Notice of Public Hearing: February 11, 2014 (Exhibit 55) 4. The applicant, North Olympic Salmon Coalition, has applied for a shoreline substantial development permit for a conditional use and for a secondary use to allow a restoration project for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek. The project site is located at the south end of Discovery Bay adjacent to U.S. Highway 101 and SR-20. The project includes removal of an abandoned railroad grade constructed through former tideflats and the restoration of the natural beach profile. The project also includes removal of fill from the mouths of four small streams that flow into Discovery Bay within the project area and removal of a creosote, timber, railroad trestle. The applicant also proposes to remove a nonfunctional culvert with tide gates; 1,700 lineal feet of railroad grade; three railroad trestle bridges; sidecast dredge spoils; and a delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek. The restoration project will require relocating a waterline within the railroad grade into road rights-of-way. The project also includes the extension of a culvert to a non-fish bearing stream on U.S. 101 and constructing a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the new waterline alignment. Finally, the applicant will bridge two, fish bearing stream mouths with box culverts. 5. The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP). The SMMP designates the shoreline area south of the railroad grade as suburban and waterward of the railroad grade as natural and conservancy. Restoration work will also occur in the aquatic designation. The SMMP considers restoration of marine habitats in all shoreline designations as an unclassified use, and such activities require a shoreline conditional use permit. While the County can administratively permit construction of a trail within the suburban shoreline designation, the applicant has applied to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively rather than individually. Thus, trail construction is included within the conditional use permitting process. 6. The applicant submitted a completed application for a shoreline substantial development permit that the County deemed complete on July 1, 2013. The Jefferson County responsible official issued a DNS following SEPA review on January 22, 2014, and received no appeals. 7. According to aerial photographs, the major portions of the project will occur waterward of the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay. Such activities will include removal of the railroad grade and trestles as well as removal of the waterline located within said improvements. The applicant will relocate the waterline beneath U.S. 101 and SR-20. The project also includes plantings along the shoreline and along the Olympic Discovery Trail. 8. Mr. Kurt Jafay owns parcels of property between U.S. 101 and Discovery Bay 4X within the project area. Waterline replacement will occur in U.S. 101 across the frontage of Mr. Jafay's property. The Olympic Discovery Trail will also be located adjacent to said parcels. Mr. Jafay appeared at the hearing and expressed concerns regarding the impact of the project on his business and tenants and whether the applicant would need to acquire portions of his property. Testimony at the hearing confirmed the following: A. The waterline relocation will occur at no cost to Mr. Jafay. B. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate the construction activities within U.S. 101 with Mr. Jafay (timing and traffic control). C. Jefferson County and the applicant will assure to best of their abilities a seamless disconnection of the present waterline and reconnection of the new line. The goal is to assume no adverse impacts on the commercial uses located on Mr. Jafay's parcel. D. The trail will not encroach onto Mr. Jafay's property as confirmed by the County's survey. The project will not require purchase of any portion of Mr. Jafay's property. E. The applicant will coordinate plantings along the shoreline in front of Mr. Jafay's property to maintain his present, open view of Discovery Bay. 9. The Findings and Conclusions set forth on Pages 5-15 of the Jefferson County Department of Community Development Staff Report (Log item 58) are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. The proposed restoration project, waterline relocation, and trail construction satisfies all criteria set forth in the SMMP subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 5X 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures, they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Waterlines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the waterline replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the 6X existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System #07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. 19. The applicant and Jefferson County Public Works shall work to provide a seamless and immediate disconnect from the old waterline and reconnection to the new waterline. Jefferson County Public Works will coordinate with Mr. Jafay regarding the timing and type of traffic control utilized on U.S. 101 during the waterline relocation and other aspects of the project that require such control. 20. The applicant will work with Kurt Jafay to provide low growth plantings along the shoreline in front of his parcels such that the current views of Discovery Bay are maintained. DECISION: The request for a shoreline substantial development permit for a conditional use and a secondary use application to allow the Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, a waterline replacement project, and construction of the Olympic Discovery Trail project along U.S. 101 and SR-20 at the south end of Discovery Bay is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2014. S EN-K. CAUSSEAUX, R. Hearing Examiner 7X ...:.• '',''.-.. . ., DEPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'N-„, z-,,,'.--,-..-74,..„ ;c.....i. • - - . , .. . . _ .:. ,.. . ,,,,.:;•••l '.:-.•.ck,,-. JEFFERSON COUNTY ' -1..•!,•,::..,4:•,,,-....=-,,,,,A -- .. - --, ...,... , 621 SHERIDAN ST. -4, ,,t„..-,,,-.,...1:,•4 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 _ .. . ._..• . o'I'l"'"-.razllk--- .• -- • it 1 'AGE iltrE ...„. . . 902231009 BRIAN R HARDCASTLE KATHRINE E HARDCASTLE 6330 SECHELT INLET RD CANADA, , . .,,.`',,,..-..',:= .•oe DEPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JEFFERSON COUNTY , wSI-INsEERNIDDANWSAT9.8,, . , `1:•.,;,...•...,„ 44,si,,„G•t° PORT TO "..'-•,' '','-:‘,..-::-..4:;•:,''..'„. :- -:-. -- '---,-,-- •-•,-,r.,. •_,-..•..=-==- ,;:''''''P"P••''''1,-;•'••-',Z,HAi•_•,. -: "::::.- "-=',v-=••;-•- .:;;;;•-=';O:j;=--:'a'.-..':-.';'-'' ...:. ...,, 983j =;!••':;;;:%'';-•••-:',=,‘2,,,°1'.•••=o,...-:,,i• '''7,;=• 964510002 JENNIFER A PEDERSEN UN INT JErr-nr-Ni A 3-,r-r-.r-1--, .. . ... ... KJ NT::.X.r.•F 98 r4 r-.l'7 o,.Po vo,4 0 Pt,0..` ' !,•-•:,/..,. . , RETURN TO SENDER TNSuPPICTEN-T 4.0DR Ss J N A L E TO F="OR"ot;AR D 1 7 BC; 9568243921 ,L6z6-06377-11- 44 4 ' 1 ' i pp1=. ,H,5K, :, ,11101,=,1114,,,,i1,111i , I I , 00 DEPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : ..A. .,.=,.---....s,'A, -., JEFFERSON COUNTY -I - •.:;..:,.,.. V•-••,- i4.i•-,.$4.-,,,,,°,. 621 SHERIDAN ST. ponT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 „ . '-'=',.,.-'-'-'•",•,. •,:.----.,.... - . ..,.., 9 R NIXIE 9.50 NYE let.i9 ..14 OC,37....11C /14 i P RETURN TO 'SENDER 2 NOT DLIVERAB =E AS ADDRESSED o, r U N AZ:L E TO 'BC. 98365243921 *2526-'02. 502 -11 '..-4Z 1 .11 .444,11V.,P4144::471.i..4 liv.inioniftilii,! !-• •• 1-- I" V..• i ""i'M L - ' .. _........,....._„,.... ,.,,,...-.....,-*,m,,-„....--, ._ ...,-- -- ..k. sON ,..., '06 DEPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..:,'.•-•"-,6t.., --i- .- ,,.,. '. „ :,..: , .0.:A! •.:-_,I JEFFE80,N COUNTY • ,- -.H. , --,,, • . : . ,, . - . , „ !•a-iik.:,:.;'• .. 621 SHERIDAN ST. „..,. . . . . , PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983C3 4 964514806 MI' nRpn I NORTHUP TRUSTE C NI X,IE 9f..,0 5 E I-00,9 0,eo-••.= po oz, .,==—, g . IF B R•F TURN TO S='7NDE-,R• INSUPRICIENT ADDRESS i 1 U N roo,3',...I TO o 0 R T-7. •91;'•344;824-?..4.7. 1.,, - 2;g„,,-2.-7,. -=_.,5t77 A-4 -11 - 4--i ' vr ?J.' lit 0 s-;!illiilli.0-001H,•11 iliLl-,10,1!..',N,,:;;Ilh,,ii ii !-, , rn -- c- --I `--.., c) 71 C) -.7., 'AD -71 0 CM -,• * O .i. '' op 5 Li) ,.■ t—, ,--..-: — Z , z 0 ( J\\ z 0 0) rn on z co ---i di to) ik) ,g) I:rn 191 1:1 (ft -Ti -1,+. * I (71 -0 0 I 0 I 71 X Ca :2 , 11 ;- ' : H 0 , , , 0 rn i m 2 4 •=k4.1 • --; m .., i 0 z m o -- c:.,r-13 N Cl) g= , . • ' '"4 I-P M ' 0 .7".w = p to I m m 14 , R.:11-a,-S74nri=i'07.7 ' 3ro 4- 0'RI 0 .,-.4.,,,-„,4,'■‘,,,,:.'.14,‘trikl't,' ._,.., = ::-.Ng °lit rrl 1.1! r.7.•a! ,14 0 M .-,.. 1 r" f-4 II ‘,...- '--Nt . ., t.- „.07,91*....% A;',!vv ,,,z,,,A 4n-y ,,,,14 ri ,,,,,,, -, 4:M",:i›., APING JEFFERSON COUNTY Hearing Guest List DATE gb-51/ 1 / CASE# 5 • ( Applicant: LI rt h H L A- t -- r -? carYt-Pa OliaLL " - ii Interested Party Of Record: Please print clearly below to receive a copy o e decision and any subsequent published case actions. NAME Add ress Do you wish to (Please Print) present testimony? Print Niame Clearly ring Ass ir U■Irk” 3 0.-. .-ty X (C) 8 No Yes c_-'6L,Asbo,f--, uoi-- S; 32__L-f 0 Fora Against INIII Print Name Clearly Mailing Address micas z t.c/ s4. 2-vrtsciA -.57t No Yes 1 —./7 / c 2 ic(vvti.4 7i c)ri" lic,(11ockf kilt cr&S.3 For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes t'ci. k.(it11.2 Print ame Clearly 6 t...3 ex i'()2.44 ,, (., ,C.Tkj VC,\th(10 - X For 0 Against 0 Mailing Ad ess I No Yes fl For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes - . For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes riFor 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against D Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against D I Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes 7 For E3 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 131 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For C3 Against 0 Print Name Clearly Mailing Address No Yes For 0 Against 0 NOSC Discovery Bay Restoration, Waterline Relocation, and Olympic Discovery Trail Application EXHIBIT LIST Item No; Item/description Date Type 1 Pre-application meeting materials varies-to 9/6/2012 A 2 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant _ 3/13/2013 G 3 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 3/14/2013 G 4 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 3/18/2013 G 5 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 7/1/2013 G 6 Shoreline application submittal 7/1/2013 A 7 Email communications from/to applicant 7/11/2013 G 8 County property owners (assessor's office) by parcel 7/30/2013 G 9 County cases, conditions, permissions by parcel 7/30/2013 G 10 DCD/PW phone communications regarding proposed trail 8/14/2013 G 11 Letter-determination of complete application 8/28/2013 G 12 DCD email to applicant- request for additional information 8/28/2013 G 13 Project drawings (restoration, waterline, trail) 9/4/20131A 14 Phone communication with applicant regarding submittal 9/4/2013 G 15 DCD/PW meeting notes to discuss trail portion of project 9/10/2013 G 16 DCD email to applicant- request for additional information 9/12/2013 G 17 Trail site plan 9/12/2013 A 18 Email communications from/to applicant 9/16/2013 G 19 DCD email communications to/from applicant regarding noticing 10/16/2013 N 20 County property owners (assessor's office) by parcel 10/17/2013 G 21 Notice of application 10/22/2013 G 22 Affidavit of posting - notice of application 10/23/2013 N, S 23 Affidavit of publication -notice of application 11/26/2013 N, S 24 Returned notice-adjacent property owner 10/24/2013 N 25 Returned notice-adjacent property owner 11/4/2013 N 26 Email communications from/to applicant 11/1/2013 G 27 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 11/16/2012 G 28 Department of Ecology comments 11/21/2013 C 29 DCD email to applicant- noticing 10/22/2013 N, S 30 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/20131G 31 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/20131G 32 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/2013 G 33 Email communications from/to applicant 12/5/2013,G 34 Applicant responses to JC Environmental Health questions (walk in) 12/5/2013 A 35 Applicant responses to JC Environmental Health questions (email) 12/5/2013 A 36 44 CFR, Section 60.3 (FEMA flooding) 12/12/2013 G 37 DCD mapping of parcels in project area 12/12/2013 G 38 Letter-determination of complete application (reprinted) 12/16/2013 G 39 Email communications from/to applicant 10/17/2013 A _ 40'Email communications from/to applicant 12/17/2013 G 41 Email communications from/to applicant 12/27/2013 G 42 DCD email communications to/from JC Environmental Health 12/31/2013 G 43 Email communications from/to applicant 1/2/2014 G 44 DCD email communications to/from JC Environmental Health 1/15/2014 C 45 Email communication from JC PW- updated trail sheet 1/16/2014 A 46 Meeting notes (meeting with applicant and JC PW) 1/16/2014 G 47 SEPA DNS j 1/22/2014 S 48 SEPA determination received by state agencies 1/22/2014 S 49 Communication with JC DCD/Building Division 1/28/20141G Key to Types A=Application L=Maps C=Comments N=Notices G=General R=Reports S=SEPA H:\exhibit list nosc 022514 1 of 2 NOSC Discovery Bay Restoration, Waterline Relocation, and Olympic Discovery Trail Application EXHIBIT LIST Item No: Item/description Date Type 50 Communication with JC EH regarding permit condition 1/28/2014 G 51 Email communications from/to applicant 1/30/2014 G 52 Communication with JC EH regarding permit condition 2/3/2014 G 53 Email communications from/to applicant 2/5/2014 G 54 Email communications from/to applicant 2/5/2014 G 55 Notice of public hearing 2/11/2014 N 56 Affidavit of posting - notice of public hearing 2/11/2014 N 57 Phone log varies-to 2/11/2014 G 58 Staff Report 2/13/2014 R 59 Email communication to applicant 2/18/2014 G 60 Email communication with J. Pelesky 2/18/2014 G 61 Email communications between JC Environmental Health and applicant 2/18/2014 G 62 Submittal to JC Environmental Health; email communications varies-to 2/18/2014 A, G 63 Email communication to/from applicant 2/24/2014 G Key to Types A=Application L=Maps C=Comments N=Notices G=General R=Reports S=SEPA H:\exhibit list nosc 022514 2 of 2 Donna Frostholm LOV 7 From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 7:49 AM rM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: South Discovery Bay Application MLA13-00088 Will do. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager(a@nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@thco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:52 PM To: Kevin Long Cc: Pinky Feria Mingo Subject: South Discovery Bay Application MLA13-00088 Hi Kevin: Just to let you know that any communications you have with EH about the water line, sampling, etc. is part of the shoreline application and needs to be part of the project file. Pinky has forwarded emails on to me. If you have any more communications with EH, please copy me on the email so I can make sure it gets added to the case file. Thanks, Don&ta'Fro-thoLwv .Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrostholm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm .µ � v iTEM From: Pinky Feria Mingo Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:28 PM Vd To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: Soil Sampling Railroad Grades FYI Since we don't have a COM for this and one isn't necessary, I would like to give you the soil sample reports Kevin left me. From: Pinky Feria Mingo Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:29 PM To: 'Kevin Long' Subject: Soil Sampling Railroad Grades Kevin, I did a little research into railroad grades and sampling. In addition to the typical contaminates(PAH, creosote, pentachlorophenol, and TPH),there is also arsenic, lead, and other metals that are often attributed to the pesticides used on railroad grades.You had asked about depth and I am attaching a report from a site in Montana. I don't know how your site compares to the one in Montana, but it may provide some insight on how to go about sampling the old railroad grade. In the event the sampling demonstrates contamination, there may be cleanup funds available through the Brownfields Program. If you need more information, let me know and I will send it along. The EPA report is a little more general but describes how similar rail to trail programs have gone about cleanup of old railroad grades and also how some have been funded through EPA's Brownfield Project. DataSummaryRep EPAReport.pdf ort.pdf Sincerely, Pinky Feria Mingo Environmental Health Specialist Jefferson County Public Health 615 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 pinky @co.jefferson.wa.us www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org http://www.Ieffersoncountvpublichealth.org/pdf/RecvclingReminders.pdf Click here to see what is recycled in Jefferson County 360 379 4489 1 SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 'TEM 2 L Eivi 0 of 'y TECHNOLOGIES, .� 11049 W.44th Avenue,Suite 200,Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 • 303.274.5400 • FAX 303.274.6160 PACIRC ACM REFINERY AND SMELTER SITE CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY SUPPORT BLACK EAGLE RAILROAD BED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION FINAL DATA SUMMARY REPORT REVISION 0 Work Assignment No. 118-RICO-0819 Work Assignment Name: ACM Refinery and Smelter Site EPA Work Assignment Manager: Charles Coleman,RPM Phone Number: 406-457-5038 PWT RAC Program Manager: Jim Bush,R.G. Phone Number: 303-274-5400 ext.47 PWT Team WA/Project Manager: Robin Witt,P.E. Phone Number: 303 274-5400 ext.35 Date: February 28,2011 U.S.EPA Contract No.EP-W-06-006 www.Dwt.com '"iffir PA=WESTERN TECHNOLOCIES,LID. q __a...4... CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 1.1 Purpose and General Objectives 3 2.0 SHE BACKGROUND 3 2.1 Site Location 3 2.2 Site History 4 2.3 Previous Railroad Bed Sample Collection Efforts 4 3.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION 6 3.1 Data Quality Objectives 6 3.2 Data Collection Design and Rationale 9 3.3 Scope of Project. 10 3.4 Description of Activities 10 3.5 Deviations from the Sampling and Analysis Plan 11 4.0 DATA SUMMARY 11 4.1 Spatial Distribution of Total Metal Concentrations in Soil 11 4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Results 12 5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT 13 6.0 DATA VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION 15 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 8.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS 17 9.0 REFERENCES .17 Tables Table 1 Surveyed Borehole Locations Table 2 Contaminant of Concern Concentrations by Borehole Table 3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure(TCLP)Results by Borehole Table 4 Relative Percent Difference Calculation for Field Duplicate Pairs Figures Figure 1 Drilling and Sampling Locations Figure 2 Cross Section A-A' Figure 3 Cross Section B-B' Page 2 of 17 NN IC WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES,LTD. APPENDICES A Boring Logs LOG ITEM • Photos C Field Notes �x D Chains of Custody ' e;: E Analytical Results and Case Narratives F Modified Analysis Requests for Quotations G Data Verification/Validation 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and General Objectives This Black Eagle Railroad Bed Subsurface Investigation Data Summary Report(DSR)presents the results of the Great Falls Railroad Bed Subsurface Investigation which was conducted in December 2010 in the community of Black Eagle,Montana. This drilling and soil sampling project was located immediately west of the Former Great Falls Refinery Site, as shown on Figure 1. All work described in this DSR was undertaken by Pacific Western Technologies, Ltd. (PWT), as a subcontractor to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Based on the review of previous surface soil sampling data, the intent of this subsurface characterization soil sampling was to further characterize the extent of arsenic,cadmium, copper, lead and zinc (metals) contamination within the Black Eagle Railroad Bed. Sampling was conducted at 19 locations to delineate the subsurface extent and concentration range of metals present along the railroad bed. The sample results presented in this DSR will support decisions with respect to future remedial actions for this railroad bed. Site-specific action levels have not been established at this time, so this DSR does not make a determination as to which samples or what total volume of soil is contaminated. However, samples which are characteristically hazardous in accordance with the results of the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)have been identified. 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND 2.1 Site Location The Black Eagle Railroad Bed is a rail spur leading from the main Burlington Northern rail line to the Former Great Falls Refinery Site in the community of Black Eagle,Montana. Black Eagle is an unincorporated community located north of the Missouri River and north of the City of Great Falls, Montana. The primary railroad bed originates outside the western boundary of the former smelter site near the Black Eagle Community Center, and runs west through the community of Black Eagle to Highway 87, spanning a distance of approximately 2,500 lineal feet. A secondary railroad siding exists along the south side of Art Higgins Memorial Park, and extends for a distance of approximately 1,500 feet. These railroad beds are shown on Figure 1. The railroad beds sampled under this project Page 3 of 17 Loci -TE • r :M Of YIRWT TEMOUXES,L are located on several properties involving different ownership because the railroad right-of way has been abandoned. 2.2 Site History The railroad involved with this project was constructed in 1892 as a spur of the St. Paul, Minneapolis&Manitoba Railway Company's right-of-way. Typical for the time frame when this railroad was constructed, the upper ballast material consisted of smelter slag,referred to on the field boring logs as "waste." The portion of the railroad bed within the fenced Former Great Falls Refinery Site has been completely obliterated by reclamation activities over the past 20 years. The remaining portion of the primary railroad bed is evident approximately 1,000 feet west of the Former Great Falls Refinery Site and extends approximately 2,500 feet to the Highway 87 underpass. Figure 2 is a cross section of the drilling and sampling locations along this railroad bed. A secondary spur of this railroad line comprises an additional 1,500 feet adjacent to the railroad bed to the south. Boreholes located along this former secondary spur are depicted in cross section on Figure 3. 2.3 Previous Railroad Bed Sample Collection Efforts Following a citizen's complaint to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Enforcement Division in 1997,the Montana Power Company collected samples from the abandoned railroad bed near 110 14th Street in Black Eagle, Montana. Montana Power Company personnel collected three 0-to 4-inch depth composite samples (composites consisting of 4 subsamples)from the railroad bed materials. The samples were analyzed for total metals as well as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Results are summarized below: Metal or Metalloid Concentration Range (milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)) Arsenic 83 —440 Barium 90—270 Cadmium 16— 140 Chromium 8— 16 Lead 830—4,200 Mercury 11 —50 Selenium Non-detect Silver Non-detect—31 TPH 41 —2,130 During December 2001,the DEQ Enforcement Division received a complaint from a citizen stating that the railroad grade near his home was contaminated with heavy metals. The home is located at 121 11th Street in Black Eagle,Montana. The DEQ Enforcement Division collected two 5-point composite samples from the railroad bed where 14th Street intersects the railroad grade. The samples were analyzed for total metals and total extractable hydrocarbons (TEH). Results are summarized below: Page 4 of 17 7RWT IC WESTERN TECHNOLOGIES,LTD. Metal or Metalloid Concentration Range (mg/kg) Aluminum 6,880—7,970 Arsenic 152—205 Barium 117— 147 °- rE Calcium 4,320— 10,200 41, �r Chromium 12— 15 ,r) � 2 Copper 1,200—2,630 - `'• Iron 37,700—44,400 Lead 2,490—4,430 Magnesium 1,260— 1,820 Nickel 14— 16 TEH 250 The railroad bed was sampled again as part of an Expanded Site Inspection conducted by the EPA in April 2003. Three separate samples of railroad bed materials were collected during this investigation and analyzed for total metals. Results of this sampling effort are presented and discussed in the Final Analytical Results Report for Expanded Site Inspection,Anaconda Minerals Company, Great Falls Refinery, (EPA, 2004). The exact depth at which these railroad bed samples were collected is unknown;however,the report does indicate that all samples were collected at depths no greater than 2 feet below ground surface. Metals detected in samples of the railroad bed materials at greater than three times their respective background soil concentrations (as stated in EPA, 2004) are as follows: Metal or Metalloid Concentration Range(mg/kg) Arsenic 37.2—445 Cadmium 3.9U—582 Chromium 7.1 — 14.8 Copper 346—2,920 Iron 24,800—31,700 Lead 541 —7,200 Mercury 0.64J—3.0 J Silver 4.1J—61.5 Sodium 449—3,920 Zinc 5,090—54,200 (Note:U indicates non-detect at sample quantitation limit;J indicates estimated concentration) In March, 2006, Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) conducted a surface soil investigation of the Great Falls Railroad Bed (ARCO 2006). The purpose of the railroad bed investigation was to further characterize the extent of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc metals contamination in surface soils along and across the Great Falls Railroad Bed. The soil samples were collected from depths of 0 to 2 inches and the results are summarized below: Metal or Metalloid Concentration Range(mg/kg) Arsenic 7.5U—445 Cadmium 3.9U—582 Copper 13.9U—3,500 Lead 8.2U—5,760 Page 5 of 17 VIII 7TRWT cwaW1101110MIES,Lm. Zinc 11.9U—80,200 (Note:U indicates non-detect at sample quantitation limit) Based on the results of these investigations,the EPA determine that more extensive investigation of the railroad beds was warranted. LUG ITEM 3.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION — -� 3.1 Data Quality Objectives The Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)process (EPA, 2000a)is an iterative, strategic planning approach designed to ensure that the type, quality, and quantity of environmental data used in decision-making are appropriate for the intended application. Once established,the DQOs are used to develop a scientific and resource-effective data collection design. DQOs are also used after data collection to evaluate how well the collected data meets the objectives of an investigation. The DQO process specifies project decisions,the data quality required to support these decisions, specific data types needed,data collection requirements, and analytical techniques necessary to generate the specified data quality. The process also ensures that the resources required to generate the data are justified. This investigation had four primary DQOs, as summarized below: DQO 1 —Problem Statement: To what extent do concentrations of metals in railroad bed subsurface soils indicate that contamination exists along the length of the railroad bed in the neighborhood of Black Eagle? Problem Scope: Boreholes spaced along the centerline of the Black Eagle Railroad Bed, and biased towards areas of higher foot-traffic Data Types: - Borehole lithology observed and recorded during drilling and sampling activities - Soil samples collected at 1-foot vertical intervals from the surface to 2 feet below "waste" or smelter slag, as visually identified in the field. Deeper samples collected on 2-foot intervals vertical from 2 feet below the bottom of waste to the bottom of the borehole. - Total metals analysis conducted by an approved CLP laboratory - Surveyed borehole locations Boundaries: Spatial: Railroad bed existing outside of the western boundary of the Former Great Falls Refinery Site near the Black Eagle Community Center, and running west to the Highway 87 underpass, spanning a distance of approximately 4,000 lineal feet Temporal: One time grab samples collected between December 13 and December 16, 2010 Decision Statement: IF Sample results indicate that metals contamination along the railroad bed is continuous; Page 6 of 17 7RWT IC WESTERN TECFNOLOGIEB,LTD. THEN Report findings and consider future step-out investigations along the length of the railroad beds. LUG ITEM DQO 2—Problem Statement: --...,. To what extent do concentrations of metals in railroad bed subsurface soils in s at c•.tanyition_ exists below the surface within the railroad bed? A- t...//1 Problem Scope: Boreholes drilled from the surface of the Black Eagle Railroad Bed to approximately 2 feet into underlying native material. Data Types: - Borehole lithology observed and recorded during drilling and sampling activities - Soil samples collected at 1-foot vertical intervals from the surface to 2 feet below "waste" or smelter slag, as visually identified in the field. Deeper samples collected on 2-foot vertical intervals from 2 feet below the bottom of waste to the bottom of the borehole. - Total metals analysis conducted by an approved CLP laboratory - Surveyed borehole locations Boundaries: Spatial: From the surface of the Black Eagle Railroad Bed to 2 feet below the native soil horizon Temporal: One time grab samples collected between December 13 and December 16, 2010 Decision Statement: IF Sample results indicate that metals contamination exists beneath the surface soil materials in the railroad bed; THEN Report findings and consider depth sampling in future step-out drilling in the railroad bed. DQO 3—Problem Statement: To what extent do concentrations of metals in railroad grade subsurface soils indicate that contamination is moving or has the potential to move down through the soil column into native soils? Problem Scope: Boreholes drilled from the surface of the Black Eagle Railroad Bed to approximately 2 feet into native material. Data Types: - Borehole lithology observed and recorded during drilling and sampling activities - Soil samples collected in a 2-foot vertical interval below the railroad grade material into native soil. - Total metals analysis conducted by an approved CLP laboratory - Surveyed borehole locations Page 7 of 17 LUG ITEM 9t1 ---YrwmcR\)1Twstnnmerstxows,Lnt e. sir Boundaries: Spatial: From the bottom of the Black Eagle Railroad Bed to 2 feet below the native soil horizon Temporal: One time grab samples collected between December 13 and December 16, 2010 Decision Statement: IF Sample results indicate that metals contamination extends into native soil materials beneath the railroad bed; THEN Report findings and consider future step-out investigations perpendicular to the railroad beds. DQO 4—Problem Statement: To what extent do concentrations of metals in railroad bed subsurface soils indicate that the material in the railroad bed is characteristically hazardous? Problem Scope: Splits of samples which had at least one detected analyte concentration, as determined by total metals analysis, greater than: 100 mg/kg for arsenic; 2,000 mg/kg for barium; 20 mg/kg for cadmium; 100 mg/kg for chromium; 100 mg/kg for lead; 4 mg/kg for mercury; 20 mg/kg for selenium; or 100 mg/kg for silver. Data Types: - Total metals analysis conducted by an approved CLP laboratory to determine if"trigger" concentrations were exceeded in total metals analytes results - TCLP analysis conducted by an approved CLP laboratory on identified samples Boundaries: Spatial: Not applicable Temporal: One time grab samples collected between December 13 and December 16, 2010 Decision Statement: IF TCLP results exceed one of the following: 5 micrograms per liter(ug/L) for arsenic; 100 ug/L for barium; 1 ug/L for cadmium; 5 ug/L for chromium; 5 ug/L for lead; 0.2 ug/L for mercury; 1 ug/L for selenium; or 5 ug/L- for silver; THEN Indentify sample as failing TCLP and document results. 3.2 Data Collection Design and Rationale The sampling approach described below was developed and implemented in the field to address the four DQOs detailed above. Boring locations were spaced at intervals along the Railroad Bed, as identified in the field during a joint site visit by PWT, EPA, and MDEQ on December 8, 2010;the average distance between boreholes was 220 feet. Samples were collected from continuous core intervals advanced through the railroad grade and no more than 2 feet into the native soil materials. Direct push technology was used to advance boreholes and to collect representative samples of the subsurface for determination of the Page 8 of 17 L LSTEM RWT PACIFIC WESTERN HOMOLOGIES,LTD. concentration of metals throughout the subsurface. Sample intervals were 1-foot intervals from the surface to 2 feet below "waste"or smelter slag, as visually identified in the field. Subsequent samples were collected on 2-foot intervals from 2 feet below the bottom of waste to the bottom of the borehole. Field personnel logged and documented soil lithologies observed in each boring on field boring log forms (Appendix A), and in field notes (Appendix C). Photographs of site conditions and sampling locations are included in Appendix B. Surveyed borehole locations are presented in Table 1. Cross sections of both railroad beds are identified on Figure 1, and are presented on Figures 2 and 3. These cross sections show both sample intervals and the general borehole lithologies identified in the field. The Black Eagle Railroad Bed Subsurface Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP), (PWT 2010)called for five percent field duplicates for Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC). A total of 170 soil samples (160 investigative samples and 10 field duplicate samples)were analyzed by a qualified CLP laboratory for the following metals: CLP Metals and Metalloids Aluminum Cobalt Potassium Antimony Copper Selenium Arsenic Iron Silver Barium Lead Sodium Beryllium Magnesium Thallium Cadmium Manganese Vanadium Calcium Mercury Zinc Chromium Nickel The primary contaminants of concern are arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc; concentrations of these metals by borehole are presented in Table 2. In addition, splits of 68 soil samples (62 investigative samples and 6 field duplicate samples) with metal concentrations above predetermined trigger levels were analyzed using the TCLP by a qualified laboratory for the following metals: TCLP Metals Arsenic Chromium Selenium Barium Lead Silver Cadmium Mercury TCLP analytical results are presented in Table 3. Trigger levels were set at concentrations above 100 mg/kg for arsenic, 2,000 mg/kg for barium, 20 mg/kg for cadmium, 100 mg/kg for chromium, 100 mg/kg for lead,4 mg/kg for mercury, 20 mg/kg for selenium, or 100 mg/kg for silver. These trigger levels represent the smallest concentration of a given metal which could potentially cause the sample to be characteristically hazardous by the TCLP, if one hundred percent of that metal in the sample was leachable. Page 9 of 17 LOG ITEM 0 T71D\X/T 3.3 Scope of Project Drilling and soil sampling were conducted along the Great Falls Railroad Bed between the Black Eagle Community Center and Highway 87 from December 13, 2010 through December 16, 2010. The length of railroad bed is approximately 4,000 lineal feet and includes two railroad spurs that exist south of the main residential area in Black Eagle. A total of 19 soil borings were completed and 170 samples were obtained from the Great Falls Railroad Bed. Boring locations were identified in the field during a joint site visit by PWT,EPA, and the Montana DEQ on December 8, 2010, and the intervals between locations along the Railroad Bed varied from 81 to 424 feet; the average distance between boreholes was 220 feet. Sampling was conducted to identify whether, and to what extent, contamination exists vertically from the surface of the railroad beds to the upper part of the underlying native soil horizon, and whether, and to what extent,contamination exists laterally over the full extent of the railroad beds. Sampling was also intended to help determine whether such contamination,if found, causes the material to exhibit characteristically hazardous behavior. 3.4 Description of Activities Boreholes were advanced using direct push methods from the surface of the Railroad Bed, terminating two feet into the native soils underlying the Railroad Bed. The total depths of these holes were between 2.2 and 28 feet, averaging12.8 feet deep. In accordance with the SAP,borings were drilled along the centerline of the railroad bed,except where the surface has been improved as a paved trail. Along the asphalt trail portion of the railroad bed,boreholes were offset to the edge of the asphalt. Continuous core samples were collected from the boreholes at each sample location and soil samples were prepared from the appropriate intervals for submittal to the analytical laboratory to determine the concentration of metals in the subsurface. PWT personnel logged and documented in field notes and on appropriate forms the sample intervals and soil lithologies observed in the borehole materials. The boreholes were refilled after sampling was completed, and topped off with bentonite hole-plug as necessary. The surface area around each hole was photographed and the borehole location surveyed. In addition to soil sampling, data collection included recording soil lithologies observed in each borehole. All 170 soil samples were analyzed by CLP methods for total metals, and splits of 68 samples which exceeded pre-determined limits for any metal were further analyzed by TCLP for the RCRA 8 metals suite. 3.5 Deviations from the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) Sampling was conducted in general accordance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) G-4, G-6 and SS-1 as modified and presented in the SAP. However,the I-Chem 300-series SuperanalyzedTM sample bottles which were delivered to the site for the sampling round were narrow mouth water sampling bottles,instead of the correct wide mouth bottles for soil sampling. After discussion with the analytical laboratory and with the principal decision makers onsite(Mr. Charles Coleman of the EPA and Mr. John Brown of the MDEQ),the decision was made to collect samples from the shallow Page 10 of 17 LOG iTEM caf YPACIFICIRWTWEVERNTECHNOLOGIES,LTD. "waste"interval of each boring into the I-ChemTM bottles, and to collect the remainder of the soil samples in Ziplock®freezer bags. CLP chain-of-custody(COC)forms assign to each sample a unique CLP sample identification (ID), as well as showing the client sample ID (listed as Station Location on the COC), the sample collection date and time, and additional information about each sample. Three samples collected from borehole BER-BH18 on December 16, 2010 were incorrectly identified in the client sample IDs on the COC as being from borehole BER-BH19. Based upon the documentation in the field notes and the field boring logs, and a comparison of sample collection times with drilling times at each of these borings,the client sample IDs have been corrected. One sample interval from BER-BH08 was incorrectly recorded in the client sample ID on the COC. Based upon the documentation in the field boring log and on the field notes,the correct sample interval was verified, and the client sample ID corrected. Seven client sample IDs were translated incorrectly from the COCs into the laboratory sample management system. These typographical errors were corrected after the CLP sample IDs were used to positively identify each sample. None of these typographical errors compromised sample integrity because the identity, collection time, and collection location of every sample is known and documented. 4.0 DATA SUMMARY 4.1 Spatial Distribution of Total Metal Concentrations in Soil Site-specific action levels have not been established at this time, so this DSR does not make a determination as to which samples or what total volume of soil is contaminated. However, samples which are characteristically hazardous in accordance with the results of the TCLP have been identified. Data was collected along the centerline of the railroad beds from the surface to 2 feet below the native soil horizon to determine the lateral and vertical distribution of metals in soil. In 18 of 19 borehole locations, at least two sample intervals were found to contain metals at concentrations which triggered a TCLP analysis. Borehole BER-BH18 did not have any samples which triggered TCLP analysis. Arsenic was seen most frequently to have concentrations high enough to trigger further analysis (47 times), exceeding the pre-determined trigger level nearly twice as often as either cadmium(25 times), or lead(23 times). Only two samples had mercury concentrations above 4 mg/kg, which triggered a TCLP analysis. No TCLP analyses were triggered due to the total metal concentration of barium, chromium, selenium or silver in the samples. The highest observed concentrations of all contaminants were found between the ground surface and 5 feet below ground surface, in and immediately below the interval of identified smelter slag in each boring. However, in some cases arsenic concentrations were high enough to trigger TCLP analysis up to 10 feet below ground surface. In a few locations, samples containing native material yielded total metal concentrations which triggered TCLP analysis. Metal concentrations in soil, as determined by total metals analysis, indicate that contamination at levels with the potential to be characteristically hazardous extends laterally to the boundaries of this investigation. Future subsurface sampling activities should look beyond the lateral boundaries of this Page 11 of 17 Of.Z Ye a 110110LODES,Lm. study, both to the west beyond Highway 87, and to the east onto the smelter site as far as the former railroad bed can be identified, to determine the full extent of metal contamination along the railroad bed in the neighborhood of Black Eagle. The vertical extent of metals concentrations in soil which have the potential to be characteristically hazardous is predominantly limited to the upper 5 feet of the railroad beds,but extends deeper in isolated locations. Native soil below the elevated railroad beds does contain metal concentrations with the potential to be characteristically hazardous in isolated locations. 4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Results The TCLP analysis was performed on 62 selected samples to determine if the material in the railroad beds is characteristically hazardous (Table 3). This information was considered necessary for guiding potential remedial decision making in the future. As previously noted,trigger levels were set at concentrations above 100 mg/kg for arsenic, 2,000 mg/kg for barium, 20 mg/kg for cadmium, 100 mg/kg for chromium, 100 mg/kg for lead,4 mg/kg for mercury, 20 mg/kg for selenium, or 100 mg/kg for silver. These trigger levels represent the smallest concentration of a given metal (as determined by total metals analysis) which could potentially cause the sample to be characteristically hazardous by the TCLP, if one hundred percent of that metal in the sample was leachable. Sixty of the 62 samples which were analyzed by TCLP exceeded the TCLP limit for cadmium, indicating that these sample intervals represent areas of characteristically hazardous material contained within the railroad beds. Forty-six samples exceeded the TCLP limit for arsenic, and 44 samples exceeded the TCLP limit for lead. TCLP results for selenium and silver were either non-detect, or estimated below the reporting limit,for all 62 samples, indicating that these metals are not found in the Black Eagle railroad beds at concentrations with the potential to be characteristically hazardous. Although barium concentrations in soil did not trigger any TCLP analyses, samples tested due to exceedances in other metal concentrations failed TCLP for barium in 28 of the 62 samples. The concentration of mercury in two near-surface samples (Table 2), as determined by total metals analysis, was high enough to trigger TCLP analysis. In both of these samples, arsenic, cadmium, and lead were also above the pre-determined TCLP trigger levels. The TCLP results for mercury were non-detect, indicating that mercury likely will not be a primary contaminant of concern as the project moves forward. However,both these samples were determined to be characteristically hazardous due to the TCLP concentrations of arsenic,barium,cadmium, and lead. 5.0 DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT The objective of the data assessment process is to determine whether the analytical results are acceptable for use in making decisions for the project. As a component of the data assessment process, the analytical data were evaluated against the data quality indicators of precision, accuracy, representativeness,completeness, and comparability(PARCC). An evaluation of each data quality indicator follows. Page 12 of 17 L ;r a :< .� YRWT EVERE TECHNOLOGIES,LTD. Precision /�/!' Precision is the measure of mutual agreement among measurements. Field precision was evaluated by calculating relative percent difference (RPD)values from the positive field duplicate results. One field duplicate was collected for every 17 investigative samples, a frequency slightly exceeding the required 5% called out in the SAP (PWT 2010). In accordance with the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review (EPA 2010), precision limits were set at RPD less than or equal to 35% at levels above two times the contract required detection limit(CRDL). Table 4 presents the results for field duplicate pairs and the calculated RPD for each analyte detected above two times the CRDL. RPD was calculated as follows: RPD = I x yI x 100 (x +y) 2 Where: x=investigative sample result y=duplicate sample result RPD exceeded precision limits in 17.5% of the calculations. Lack of duplicate precision for some field and laboratory duplicates could indicate a non-homogenous distribution of the elements of concern within the sample that might be mitigated by further processing of the raw samples before analysis. RPDs in detected, non-estimated results ranged from a minimum of 0.6% to a maximum of 130%. The mean RPD was 19.5% and the median RPD was 9.8%. In general, lower RPDs were observed for samples collected in imported fill materials than in those samples collected from the smelter slag. Close examination of the comparison of field duplicate pairs with RPDs over 35% indicates that lack of precision in analytical results does not impede the use of these results to determine whether a sample contains metals at concentrations above the pre-determined trigger levels. For example, chromium results for samples BER-BH04-2.6:3.6 and BER-BH04-2.6:3.6D were 7.3 mg/kg and 3.7 mg/kg, respectively. This resulted in a calculated RPD of 65.5%. However,these results are still conclusive in their determination that the quantity of chromium in the sample was less than 100 mg/kg, and TCLP analysis was not necessary to determine if the material was characteristically hazardous due to chromium contamination. The data collected under this sampling program is precise enough to determine whether soils within the Black Eagle railroad beds are characteristically hazardous. Accuracy Accuracy is the agreement of measured values with an accepted reference value. Accuracy is evaluated by examining the recoveries obtained for spiked target analytes in standard and natural matrix spiked samples. Because accuracy is primarily determined using laboratory quality control information which was examined during the data verification and validation process,the accuracy of the data collected under this sampling program is discussed in detail in Section 6.0 of this report. Page 13 of 17 1 • RVIT PACK WESTERN TECHNOLOGES,LTD. Representativeness Representativeness refers to the selection and application of sampling locations, sampling protocols, and analytical methods such that the results are representative of the media being sampled and the conditions being measured. As described in the SAP (PWT 2010),borehole locations were selected in the field to be representative of the railroad beds; and at each borehole, samples were collected over intervals designed to be representative of observed field conditions in that location. In accordance with the SAP (PWT 2010), samples were analyzed by analytical methods prescribed by the EPA at an approved laboratory participating in the CLP program. Total metals analysis was completed in accordance with standard CLP protocols. The TCLP analysis was modified to allow the laboratory to check total metal results against the pre-determined trigger levels and then run the TCLP test without additional instruction from EPA or PWT. Copies of the TCLP Modified Analysis Requests for Quotation, prepared by the CLP Coordinator, are included as Appendix F of this DSR. An evaluation of QC blanks (trip blanks, field blanks, and rinse blanks)is typically completed as part of the data quality assessment. However, in accordance with modifications to the CFRSSI QAPP requested by ARCO in March of 1996 and approved by EPA,no external contamination equipment blank samples were submitted. Laboratory method blanks measure potential contamination from laboratory sources such as glassware, reagents,preservatives, and laboratory water. In accordance with contract requirements,the laboratory prepared and analyzed preparation,initial, and continuing calibration blanks. No preparation or calibration blanks contained analytes above the CRDL. However, low levels in some of the blanks required qualifying low-level results as not detected at the reporting level. Additional details regarding laboratory quality control results are included in Section 6.0. Because the program was designed to provide characterization level information about the railroad beds, and the sampling and analysis program was implemented as described in the SAP(PWT 2010), the data are judged to be representative. Completeness Completeness is a comparison of the amount of valid data obtained from a sampling program compared to the amount of data expected and needed to meet the project goals. Valid analytical data are those that have been identified as usable (i.e.,not rejected). There were only limited instances in the field where desired samples could not be collected due to poor recovery(insufficient sample volume), or no recovery over the desired sample interval. Despite these exceptions, sample collection under this program is judged to be complete because locations of poor or no recovery were isolated, and the preponderance of samples were collected at the spacing and over the intervals called out in the SAP(PWT 2010). While some data were rejected due to problems with laboratory method blanks or sensitivity issues, over 95% of the results from all analyses were usable. Looking only at the primary contaminants of concern, the amount of valid data is upward of 98%. Although the SAP(PWT 2010) did not identify a specific data-completeness goal for the project, 95% is typically considered acceptable for this type of investigation. Additional detail concerning data validation and verification is contained in Section 6.0 of this report. Page 14 of 17 LUG II `1 m 0-` r WT Iq WE8TBIN TECHNOLOGIES,LTD. Comparability Comparability refers to the confidence with which one data set can be evaluated relative to another. Prior to beginning this investigation, it was determined that comparability with data previously collected by ARCO would increase the usability of any new data obtained for the project. Therefore, the field QA program for this investigation was designed to incorporate many of the field QA procedures developed in the following: Clark Fork River Supeifund Site Investigation (CFRSSI)SOP G-4, Field Logbook/Photographs(ARCO, 1992a); CFRSSI SOP SS-I, Sample Collection from Soil Borings, Excavations, and Hand Dug Pits (pages SS-1.1 and SS-1.2 only). These SOPs were modified the proposed work and then followed in the field; copies of the SOPs and specific to be appropriate to e p P P P modifications were included in the SAP (PWT 2010). Consistent procedures for the reporting and management of the data generated were also followed throughout the project. All data, with the exception of rejected results, P are considered comparable. P rejected 6.0 DATA VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Data validation and verification were completed in accordance with the EPA 2010 Functional Guidelines (EPA, 2010)by a PWT Chemist. Results were validated for approximately 12% of the 170 ( � ) Y PP Y soil samples, and for approximately 5% of the sample delivery groups (SDGs). The analytical laboratory performed validation(Stage 2B Validation Electronic)on all analytical results;however, examination of the lab qualifiers revealed that the software program used was not up-to-date with the EPA 2010 Functional Guidelines. PWT completed 100% verification (Stage 2B Validation Manual) for primary anal es of interest (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and for all samples o the p y yt ( y, zinc)in soil, and for the TCLP analysis of RCRA 8 metals. Validation(Stage 3 Validation Manual) was completed for randomly selected SDG MH37F1 which contained TCLP results for 20 samples. Detailed results from the data verification and validation are presented in Appendix G, and summarized below. The validation qualifiers which appear with the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 of this DSR capture the implications of laboratory QC sample results and apply them to the appropriate individual investigative samples or entire SDGs in accordance with the Functional Guidelines. Samples were analyzed in SDGs for totals metals by the CLP inorganic methodology that included 15 to 25 samples from vertical sampling in each borehole. Samples for quality control were chosen randomly by the laboratory in the total metals SDGs. Each sample with measured total metals concentrations in excess of pre-determined trigger levels were extracted by the TCLP and analyzed to determine if the sample was characteristically hazardous. Despite the random selection of samples for method quality studies,the majority of the packages analyzed for total metals had outside-of-method-limit qualifications for several elements concerning matrix spike additions, duplicate precision, and serial dilution. The laboratory's Form I equivalents and package narratives in Appendix F include all identified quality control deviations. These non- ' compliance issues are summarized in the independent PWT validation qualifiers attached to the summary results. Many of the results for elements of concern are qualified as estimated, summarizing the application of the EPA Functional Guidelines for verifying inorganic data. These qualifiers relate to the difficulty encountered in analyzing this sample matrix and appear to be independent of the method performance of the laboratory. Unless specific matrices are identified in the samples and proven independent of the actual quality control sample chosen,the Functional Guidelines require Page 15 of 17 LOG T- 1.1'e C NMI TEOPOUNES,uo. qualification of all samples in a package for the non-compliance of the single, independently chosen, sample used for quality control. Lack of duplicate precision for some field and laboratory duplicates might indicate a non-homogenous nature for the distribution of the elements of concern in the samples, which might be mitigated by further processing of the raw samples before analysis. Further study of the standard and natural matrix spiked samples with the magnitude of the elements of concern might clarify causes of the matrix interferences and at what levels this might be of importance. The post-digestion spike studies indicate that most elements of concern are not subject to matrix effects when higher levels of spikes are added after digestion, suggesting that high level samples may not be influenced by matrix interference to the same extent as low-level samples. Matrix effects of the samples are also demonstrated in the data from TCLP analyses,but not to the extent seen with the total metal analyses. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The analytical data collected during this investigation were of sufficient quality to meet the DQOs of this study. However, if future investigations require a higher level of precision or accuracy in the quantitation of metals contamination in soil, adjustments to the procedures for sample collection and preparation may be necessary, as may be possible modifications to the contract requirements for the analytical laboratory. The analytical data collected during this investigation suggests that metals contamination does exist in the Black Eagle railroad beds at concentrations high enough to cause the material to be classified as characteristically hazardous. This contamination extends laterally beyond the limits of the study at both ends of the railroad beds investigated. This contamination is not limited to the surface or near surface soils, and in some cases extends down into the native soil horizon below the railroad beds. Future step-out characterization sampling should be considered to determine the lateral and vertical extents of contamination within the Black Eagle railroad beds. 8.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS The analytical data collected during this investigation have been uploaded to the EPA Scribe Database and will also reside in a database maintained by PWT. Analytical laboratory data deliverables and original field documentation will be maintained at the PWT office location in accordance with PWT's RAC2 contract requirements. 9.0 REFERENCES Atlantic Richfield Company(ARCO). 1992a. "Clark Fork River Superfund Site Investigation, Standard Operating Procedures." September 1992. ARCO. 1992b. "Clark Fork River Superfund Site Investigation, Data Management/Data Validation Plan."May 1992. Page 16 of 17 a o PACIFIC WESTERN TEOWOLOGIES,LTD. ARCO. 1999. "Addenda to Clark Fork River Superfund Site Investigations, 1. Sampling and Analysis Plans."November 1999. PWT. 2010. "Black Eagle Railroad Bed Subsurface Sampling and Analysis Plan."December 2010. U.S. EPA. 2000. "Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process, EPA QA/G-4."August 2000. U.S.EPA. 2010. "Contract Laboratory Program, National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Supeifund Data Review."January 2010 Page 17 of 17 L F, YTE ii' ricif r'►5 :.ar 7) r r rer1r7 re ' 11 .6_ r.(3 r rr 1, 6's Lessons Learned and Guidance to Keep Your Rail-Trail Project on Track 'II fits TR,�►IL.`� E!''';;EA5'•t;L. PREPARED BY RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY d / 073 Understanding Environmental Contaminants — Lessons Learned and Guidance to Keep Your Rail-Trail Project on Track September 24, 2004 iIzU DART TRAIL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE RESPONSE TEAM A Service of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy ill LUCITE PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS i �� ~ •,. Jeffrey Ciabotti Betsy Goodrich Hugh Morris Steve Winslow, Esq. MISSION: The purpose of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy is to enrich America's communities and countryside by creating a nationwide network of public trails from former rail lines and connecting corridors. Special thanks to Craig Della Penna, Barbara Richey and Jennifer Simmons, and project managers of the case studies: Stuart Beckley, Ignacio Dayirt, Sean Duperron, Leo Hennessy,Jeff Nangle, PELSP - TEft TABLE OF CONTENTS : _ , of Preface(Note: letter from MA elected official or President of RTC) 1 Introduction:The Making of a Movement 2 Rail-trails—A Background 3 History of the Rail-Trail Movement 3 The Value of Rail-Trails 3 National Perspective: Rail Trail Conversions and Environmental Contamination 5 Legacy of the Railroads 5 Recycling Railroad Corridors—Context and Issues 5 National Surveys 6 Risk Management Strategies 9 Typical Contaminants—What You Might Find 9 Due Diligence 9 State Regulations 10 Levels of Investigation 12 Hiring an Environmental Professional 12 Remediation Alternatives 14 Recovering Clean-up Costs from the Polluter 15 Management and Maintenance 15 Case Studies 16 Summary 16 Case Study 1: Manhan Rail Trail, Easthampton, Massachusetts 17 Case Study 2: Betsie Valley Trail, Benzie, Michigan 19 Case Study 3: Doyle Street Greenway,Alameda, California 22 Case Study 4:Trail of the Coeur d'Alenes, Kootenai, Shoshone, and Beneway Counties, Idaho 24 Funding and Other Resources 26 Federal and State Resources 26 Funding Sources 26 Appendix Appendix A: Survey Form to Trail Managers—Attempt I and Attempt II 28 Appendix B: Survey Responses 29 Appendix C: Case Study Survey—Form 37 Appendix D: Lexis Search—Media 38 44. L01.; JT (4,11 PREFACE LETTER COMING I to; ;„!!! !!!!Z3 !!! !!!, "tc:'14-!! '''',!!7!! !!!!!!!!' -;!!•!, • „, ti AiL1 of INTRODUCTION Throughout Rails-to-Trails Conservancy's(RTC) 18 years of experience, contamination has generally not been an obstacle when developing rail-trails. Communities wishing to convert rail corridors into multi-use paths sometimes find themselves in the difficult position of dealing with known, potential or perceived contamination along a railbed. Questions arise during all phases of trail development, from land acquisition to management. Future trail users may ask about potential exposure at public meetings. Trail opponents may raise concerns about contamination as a means to impede or thwart trail devel- opment or property acquisition. Elected officials may fear contaminant clean-up could escalate project costs.Abutters may worry about dust kicked up during construction. Trail managers need answers to questions about contamination to keep projects on track, however no comprehensive source of information existed to aid trail developers in addressing these complex issues. This report serves as a national resource guide to assist communities in utilizing new and existing brownfield programs to understand and address environmental clean-up issues that may inhibit the conversion of unused rail rights-of-way(ROW) into multi-use trails. RTC's objective was to address brownfield concerns by researching appropriate legal,funding and construction issues related to rail- to-trail conversions.The findings of this research will assist local communities to resolve potentially complex contamination occurrences by employing successful strategies outlined in this report. To address this problem and provide guidance to communities struggling to convert rail corridors into multi-use trails, this report seeks to answer the following questions: • What potential contamination may be encountered along rail-lines? • What steps need to be taken when contamination is found? • How have other communities effectively addressed the legal,funding and construction issues of a contaminated site? • What are the federal and state resources available to assist communities as they deal with legal,funding,testing, remediation and construction issues? To answer these questions, the research team conducted a survey of trail mangers to report the incidence of contamination and any remediation efforts, and case studies were chosen to analyze how other communities have addressed these issues. In the following pages you will also find a review of legal issues, funding sources and other state and federal resources available to trail developers. Finally,guidelines have been provided to the trail developer who must tackle the issue of remediation on a rail corridor. This national resource guide has been created to aid communities where a potential hazard has been identified. Each rail corridor is unique and contamination may not exist or varies depending on uses of the corridor. However based on the survey conducted for this report—Lexis search on media over the past 20 years and contact with trail managers—Rails-to-Trails Conservancy has found that, overall, potential contamination along a corridor has not hindered the creation of rail-trails. O LUiz RAIL-TRAILS -A BACKGROUND ' 1 HISTORY OF THE RAIL-TRAIL MOVEMENT It began in the mid-1960s, quietly, gradually, hesitatingly.There wasn't much fanfare. It was primarily a Midwestern phenomenon, barely noticed in places like Los Angeles, New York or Washington, D.C. People didn't say, Is that the latest fad?"They said, "That's a really smart idea!" The idea was to convert unused or abandoned rail corridors into public trails.A simple concept, unlike the complex railroad system that was crumbling physically and financially. It didn't require or even claim an inventor. Once the tracks were removed, people naturally started walking along the grades, socializing, exploring, discovering old railroad relics, and marveling at old industrial facilities such as bridges, tunnels, abandoned mills, sidings and switches. In the snows of winter the unconventional outdoor enthusiast skied or snowshoed on the corridor. In the days before even running and all-terrain bicycling were common pastimes, the predominant activity was walking. Of course, none of the corri- dors were paved or even graded. They were simply abandoned stretches of land. "Rails-to-Trails" is what people started calling the movement, and the name was catchy and descriptive enough to give the concept a tiny niche in the fledgling environmental movement that was gathering momentum and bracing for huge battles shaping over clean air and water. However, it was destined to move into the mainstream of the conservation and environmental protection. After all, it had all the ingredients: recycling, land conservation, wildlife habitat and historical preservation, non-motorized transportation, physical fitness, recreation access for wheelchair users and numerous other benefits. In 1965 few Americans understood the national importance of rail-trails. Rails-to-trails was still a highly localized movement. But gradually a realization emerged that America desperately needed a national trails system and that abandoned rail corridors were the perfect backbone for that network. Today, more than 35 years later, rail-trails have begun to make a significant mark, with 12,585 miles of rail-trails and approximately 100 million users per year. THE VALUE OF RAIL-TRAILS Rail-trails provide places for cyclists, hikers, walkers, runners, inline skaters, cross-country skiers, eques- trians and physically challenged individuals to exercise and experience the many natural and cultural wonders of the nation's urban, suburban and rural environments. Rail-trails not only serve as indepen- dent community amenities, they also enhance existing recreation resources by linking neighborhoods and schools to parks, waterfronts, recreation centers and other facilities. Multiple Recreation Opportunities. Rail corridors are flat or have gentle grades, making them perfect for multiple users, including walkers, inline skaters, bicyclists and people with disabilities. Trails are multimodal and versatile passageways. Economic Renewal and Growth. Trail users spend money on products and services related to recre- ational activities. Bicycle and inline skate shops, food stores, hotels and tourist locations report an increase in business as a result of trails.Trail-related businesses spring up in communities with trail, spurring economic growth in the area. Increased Property Values. Studies have shown that properties on land adjacent to trails and green- ways often increase in value. People are willing to pay more money to have a multi-use trail in their O J neighborhood.Trails have become an important amenity that homebuyers seek when choosing where to live. Healthy Living. The U.S. Surgeon General estimates that 60 percent of American adults are not regu- larly active and 25 percent are not active at all. In communities across the country, people do not have access to trails, parks or other recreation areas close to their homes. Trails and greenways pro- vide safe, inexpensive avenues for regular exercise. Environmental Protection. Trails and greenways help improve air and water quality. Communities with trails provide enjoyable and safe options for clean transportation, which reduces air pollution. By protecting land along rivers and streams, greenways prevent soil erosion and filter pollution caused by agricultural and road runoff. Connecting People and Communities. Trails serve as utilitarian transportation corridors between neighborhoods and workplaces.They connect congested urban areas with open space. By bringing people to greenways for their daily commutes,trails unite people and their natural surroundings. Regional Systems. Bringing trails together to form networks dramatically increases the positive impact trails can have on their communities by creating threads of green linkages within and between com- munities. Regional trail systems increase the value of the whole by connecting the parts, forming a more cohesive transportation system allowing people to travel to other communities or to work and combine trail use with other forms of transit. 0 L) t' 1r"R; ys. S...3 NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: RAIL-TRAIL CONVERSIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION LEGACY OF THE RAILROADS By the beginning of the 20th century railroad transportation was synonymous with industry and suc- cess. Having a railroad in town was considered a great status symbol and communities often bid against one another to entice the railroad to come to town. In the United States, railroads reached a peak in total mileage around World War I with approximately 270,000 miles of track.The system has since shrunk to the current total of about 105,000 miles. The collapse of the railroad industry can be generally attributed to the loss of cargo traffic to trucks in the 1950s and loss of passenger traffic to increased automobile travel. In the early 1980s the rapid abandonment of corridors by railroads and the dismantling of this valu- able network set off alarms, and Congress passed an amendment to the National Trails System Act in 1983. This law allowed unneeded rail lines to be "railbanked," or set aside for use in the future as a transportation corridor, while being used as a trail in the interim. The collapse of the railroad industry has left a network of linear transportation corridors, which if lost today would be difficult, if not impossible, to recreate. While no longer needed for rail use, these important corridors are being recycled and offer communities the opportunity to create multi-use trails.Today, in 2004, we are near- ing 13,000 miles of open rail-trails that are used for a variety of k I ,; t sex purposes including physical activity, recreation and transportation. w 1 d t .` :,,; sir d 7 ,�J tof contaminants include creosote used to preserve wood ties, coal ash from engines, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)from diesel exhaust. Data collected in Massachusetts during the devel- opment of a commuter rail serves as one example of the results of extensive testing for residual con- tamination. Trail development can often serve as the most practical method to deal with risks posed by residual contamination. Industrial activities either in railyards or adjoining the rail also contribute contaminants. These areas are often associated with switching and rail yards, where higher levels of petroleum, metals, pesticides and other substances associated with repairs and general maintenance can be found. In addition, higher contamination levels have been found on sidings or in areas adjacent to industries where con- taminants have spread onto the rail bed.These areas may warrant targeted investigations to identify if elevated or more hazardous levels of contamination require specific clean-ups are present. (See Case Study 1: Manhan Rail Trail.) NATIONAL SURVEYS In order to assess the degree to which the issue of contamination impacted rail-to-trail conversions, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy(RTC)conducted a national review of what was done on current rail-trails as well as a survey of coverage of this issue in the media. SUMMARY OF RAIL-TRAIL MANAGER SURVEY RESULTS In an effort to assess the actual efforts of rail-trail developers around the country to uncover traces of contaminated residue from past railroad operations, and any subsequent effort to mitigate any such substances found in the corridor being developed for trail use, RTC developed a questionnaire de- signed to elicit any actions or discoveries of consequence(See appendix A for questionnaire.) This survey was e-mailed to 715 trail contacts. Of these, 112 returned the survey filled out either in whole or in part and 81 were discovered to be defunct e-mail addresses. Of the active e-mails, the survey received an 18 percent response rate. A summary of the responses is below and an itemization of responses to key questions is reproduced in Appendix B. As shown below in the Summary of Responses, the survey shows that most rail-trail developers and managers followed due diligence procedures(including Phase I assessment and visual inspection), surveying the corridor,to one degree or another, and finding nothing, continued with development plans. In addition to surveying trail managers SUMMARY OF RESPONSES on the trail corridor, they were asked about railroad sidings and operations Trails indicating Phase I Assessment 20 years. RTC was curious as to whether Trails indicating Phase II Assessment 3 these parcels of land were more likely Trails indicating visual inspection 16 to be contaminated. Only two respon- Trails indicating soil samples 10 dents remarked on this situation and concluded that they tested and found Trails finding toxic residue 1© no contamination of concern. Trails finding no evidence" of contamination 15 0 SUMMARY OF LEXIS SEARCH — MEDIA Project managers may be concerned that public attention could unduly focus on the contamination and detract from efforts to promote trail development. One way to gauge potential public concern about contamination on rail corridors is to look at the news articles reported in the media. Rails-to- Trails Conservancy conducted a search of newspaper articles on Lexis. Search criteria included major newspapers and were subject to Lexis search exclusions and rules. The search revealed that while there were more than 3,000 articles that mentioned rail-trails, few mentioned the most common residual contaminants; arsenic and creosote. Criteria for the search and exclusions can be found in Appendix D. The table below summarizes the number of articles found with each set of search criteria. RESULTS OF LEXIS RESEARCH ON"RAILTRAILS"AND"TOXINS" Hits All News Major Terms (English) Newspapers Rail trails more than 3000 more than 3000 Rail trails, toxins 22 8 Rail trails,toxins,arsenic 4 0 Rail trails, toxins, arsenic, creosote 0 0 Rail trails,toxins creosote 1 1 Rail trails, creosote 13 6 Rail trails,arsenic 19 3 Rail trails, arsenic, creosote 0 0 O ..*.,.e'er. u , RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES When dealing with a corridor that may be contaminated, it is important that the trail developer em- ploy a risk management strategy that includes planning, designing, constructing and maintaining the trail to reduce risks to construction workers, maintenance crews and trail users. This is also the best defense against liability. This section provides some steps that trail developers should take when build- ing and managing a trail. Why should a Trail Manager be concerned about hazardous materials in a rail corridor? • Protect human health and the environment; • Liability which may result in litigation; • Funding sources or lending institutions may require investigation (due diligence); • Regulatory requirements, and; • Construction and maintenance considerations. When should you be concerned about potential contamination? PRE-PURCHASE Prior to purchasing the corridor and after finalizing a preliminary agreement with the railroad repre- sentatives, the buyer should complete due diligence procedures and become familiar with federal and state regulations concerning liability. This process entails examining the state of the title, surveying the property, appraising the corridor's value, assessing the integrity of structures within the corridor and conducting an environmental assessment of the corridor. After these steps are complete, if the due diligence raises new issues or reveals contamination problems, the buyer should meet with the railroad representatives or landowner to renegotiate the terms of the agreement. Following this meeting, if the buyer is content with the new terms of the agreement then the acquisition of the corridor should be finalized. POST-PURCHASE For the following reasons, you will still want to be concerned about contamination even if you have acquired the property without following the ASTM requirements: • People using the right-of-way prior to construction may be exposed to contaminants at un- safe levels; • Construction contractors may need to test soil that looks contaminated in order to comply with Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements for their workers; • Any soil removed during construction may be subject to either federal and state hazardous waste disposal requirements; • Identifying contaminated soil prior to construction allows you to properly manage and bud- get for handling of contaminants. You may even be able to relocate soils to other parts of your project area to avoid off-site disposal costs. 0 &, 3I a1. - ,_S.,,eLk,P17 41,a_ TYPICAL CONTAMINANTS — WHAT YOU MIGHT FIND What constitutes a contaminant? In general a contaminant is any physical, chemical, biological or radiological substance such as an element,compound, mixture, solution, etc.that can be found in any media(air, surface water,ground- water or soil)that may be harmful to human health or have adverse effects on the environment. In terms of federal regulations and statutes, a contaminant has been defined as a hazardous substance, hazardous waste or pollutant by various policies including the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensa- tion Liability Act(CERCLA), the Solid Waster Disposal Act, Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act. In Section 40 CFR302 of the CERCLA,there are 717 substances listed as hazardous materials. CERCLA and state laws that were surveyed appear to exempt the normal applications of pesticide from clean- up laws. In some states this exemption also applies to herbicides and fertilizers. What are the contaminants I should be aware of when acquiring a rail corridor? ''''Y''''' ' .r • Railroad ties(wood-treating chemicals includ- PROCESS STEPS ing creosote) • Spilled or leaked liquids(oil, gasoline, diesel ., ddige . toypotentiaihaz fuel, cleaning solvents and detergents) ' „��,: ,� d."S M�.th0 r sr"r k., • Herbicides ,®�_ �,i t the effects .. ,--- e. s::,'F'...* -- -aced to • Fossil fuel combustion products(PAHs) , �; nt,d eco r--# c", ,'' ; -i • Roofing shingles(asbestos) � ?eter � w�at, , zddrG, ,..:t,tip- '...,,, lion »-,at , to baleen 4' ' • Air Compressors(used in braking and for ‹; -" '` }0a starting engines) ,-'�sExamine „ s bends"Vst ) .. at ' 1, ,with• ., tt tm 't.,i'f+a=Y • Transformers and Capacitors(used in train :, k '�' • ° = e inf. F- , Ar latorsand controls and electric generation) g F -r • Metals(arsenic—pesticides, wood preserva- • .. to avoid ers tives,fossil fuel combustion; mercury—corn- *`. = ., ° r. .,, ,;be pro- ' ;`' e e -' t+^9,^ m r a e bustion products, leaking gauges) - `� gis � to the extent . : , t , DUE DILIGENCE t. F4.'0-- , , a.,, at ws- ,'' co truction in a.. 4;;;;;:,:z--,4.- n.area removal The term "due diligence" represents the process of contaminated , , ,,other materials; evaluating the risks and value of a corridor that is to bey -'� 1::; --, , ,, Once t -. to n#or use,a CO 4 ,,4,4 purchased.To exercise due diligence a corridor buyer sveman" , ��� ',0{',..1.-,‘..'t-in mat�t� r 7 s must implement a plan to identify possible hazards and aP> ., , ,: , carry out the appropriate corrective action to prevent 9 tr, °£ r • ,q,t. ..,Person should " the acquisition of an environmentally contaminated area. -' ' n t Due diligence is important in legal matters as a buyer ,� tenant�e ,�, . s;'end; �,_ could face potential lawsuits pertaining to the health x .& - and safety of the corridor's patrons. • S'gnage; , ' sheutd post ae1, ' - "‘ t 6 The level of due diligence warranted will depend on the ,,,:„4,„„ 1... ,, O mor 111 aw situation and the state's regulations.As can be seen by the survey responses and the Lexis search, contamination has not been a hinderance to trail development. However starting with some basic due diligence will help the trail developer decide what levels of assessment are needed. STATE REGULATIONS Unless a rail-trail happens to run through a Federal National Priority List or"Superfund" site, the EPA will probably not have direct regulatory involvement in any clean-up actions. EPA policies and federal brownfield legislation often limit EPA regulatory involvement when a clean-up follows state require- ments. Each state has different requirements.The American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM) has developed inquiry standards that EPA has adopted, which may also be adopted by the state.The state's lead environmental agency will be the best place to find state contamination clean-up require- ments. Most states now have a division that works on clean-up or remediation that is often found in the state environmental protection agency. A trail developer could also consult an environmental professional about what the state requires for levels of investigation. Many state programs have similar steps but differ in how involved state officials will be in each step. Generally the steps in the clean-up process are as follows: B EVOLUTION OF CLEAN-UP LAWS ^ "' I v ' i m frith*and A,� -rSee;= parries initially complied by capturing pollutants and scot b�,£ to Love Cane EPA •,. state . beg:a t i rn s or duping them l ti�m a e a it r7r 'e such 70s 'wastes had seeped a® . groundwater,and harmed or threatened to harm people, resulted in releases'of contamination.''the list of c'+ pl and wildlife ln reaction �. tions that may have posed a risk to health and the erM- r� as W in Upstate X �® , d� i � d t = ` at a rapid rate and quickly outstripped the paComprehensive 4.4;'4 .�t fade - state +dent resources available '..under pion,and Liability Act( d ) ®� o' " a^ take• ; r forcenelluters to so. #- as Superfurid. CEIRCLA authorized the EPA to undertake ▪' # New testing technologies allow " fl and' ting clean-ups and then sue peters property owners g � for those Cam; 44 -Nfi with - -cies in the pt? �tk y a , A:4'; • .°!-these tests, ®!F q^t$s aF�',�t CERCLA had.X .sz, pact- olfut i such levels of contamination a Ised a risk to ei- a.if n .$, 4 -ya' x' g; .y „?..6..xT 1,4; yc *L j.,, ers'became y • •i hazardous • •pyie.s health or the a z+ r P:, l=aced with rs tes d �8°d? 8 m' kAr-• to '.nt'V 9,«^ . S▪ .,X ! A ',Wristlet and `t "f ' :.[, /{-t9 1T F#'"6tB • 9 dffi B' 8`} commercial; - purchasers began inspecting and test ®. , prote i • ,> -.t Eon ar . .,era s • of•• F mina ..n,aXe ,p de X � .�.k and X-• t :3 • ee� r .•sility i dea.n4q)'' o .c '" Pros'^`-r a a A ` k`'°a' '. ': the e to ` i Mates enacted laws= A w i k r My.,h � "fi' t 10 .0 'i 1i , i" --.._.,� ! a---- • An initial assessment(the due diligence report should suffice for this step); • A follow-up assessment that includes sampling areas of concern identified in the Initial As- sessment; • Determination of existing risks and target clean-up levels; • Development of a remedial plan to cost-effectively achieve the clean-up levels; • Implementation of the remedial plan, and; • Post clean-up close-out. The level of a state's involvement determines the pace of clean-up and can also affect overall costs. Some states will review and approve each assessment report and clean-up plan before a developer can proceed to the next step.A clean-up agreement with the state may need to be signed requiring the trail developer to pay the costs of state review. More and more states have developed programs that allow private parties to proceed with assessments and clean-ups supervised by licensed environmental professionals. In Massachusetts, for instance, most clean-ups proceed entirely under the direction of private clean-up professionals and do not require any approval by the state. Determining the level of clean-up for a corridor fundamentally determines how much mitigation is necessary. Several approaches have been developed on determining how much clean-up is necessary. Initially most states developed site-specific standards based on a methodology of extrapolating health risks from contaminant levels known as "risk assessment." Risk assessment methods contain many variables and assumptions. As a result the development of site-specific standards can be time-consum- ing. Some states have developed generic clean-up levels based on the current and expected use of the site.These generic levels greatly simplify the clean-up decision-making process and create a"bright finish line." States using generic clean-up standards require developers to file deed notices if contaminant levels remaining on-site will not protect people in all situations. The deed notice may include the following information: (1) a plan indicating the location covered by the notice, (2) a description of the contami- nants of concern, (3) a list of allowable and restricted uses, (4)a plan to maintain any cap or barrier and 5)steps that must be taken when contaminated soils need to be excavated. Once clean-up levels have been established, clean-up alternatives are reviewed, costs and a clean-up plan are developed. Many states now allow asphalt and landscaping to serve as protective barriers for contaminated soils.An environmental consultant or state environmental agency should be able to recommend the thickness of asphalt and ground cover that has been found acceptable in other loca- tions in the state. In some instances, half-a-foot to two feet of contaminated soil may need to be removed or treated. Any soil removed off-site must be transported to an appropriate location. For instance, Massachusetts prohibits contaminated soils from being transported to any location signifi- cantly less contaminated than the soil.This helps prevent circumstances where slightly contaminated soil ends up in the backyards of new residential developments. The clean-up plan must be developed into a detailed scope of work to be included in the construction contract.The scope should be as detailed as possible and discuss how contamination will be ad- dressed, including test protocols, quantities and types of contaminants to be cleaned-up. Often the contractor that constructs the trail will also be responsible for removing railroad ties and contaminated soil.A contractor can make more money removing contaminated soil than clean soil. 0 .44 LIC)G.I.T: -fi . �r i>• xw An engineer or consultant independent of the !X ig' -,r.' construction contractor can confirm the quan HIRING AN titles of material the construction contractor ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL removes and that the correct testing proce- s - dures have been followed. The construction 41 ,AN � ItLiT,�f� ,.�;��� � � can qurckf;' contract should require the construction com- �r►nforitatitm, a 'and state data * acid recorxs + arch as Sanborn Maps, pany to make reasonable efforts to minimize �n a a ,, cwhat areal unwanted off-site disposal of contaminated r atktrarf" <-most concern. .'*+ +, coups soil. by � �`Sist with$ elfr�t +. infon patron a a rndustrre �'° , and'''' LEVELS OF INVESTIGATION rty a g a; v X.4e' +'iis �envr + consultants f Is the corridor a brownfield? k. < lists will curt a i+ a idiot/lance < According to the U.S. Environmental Protec- '.:r lrt torsi t#�r the prtry # tion A enc EPA the word "brownfield" is �+ tea + -..:1'71:-.-.41.....,,..!„r outer, g Y agent rta regu)ar p' 6uymg aoxl'�'�'"' used to describe areas of abandoned or � ar apr�a•"���' acrd who have hr 'a` .x®t underused land that is perceived to be, or in tal cons pants,.in the ast. Viz. i p fact is, environmentally contaminated due to ties may O z to axg+ a • past industrial or commercial use. Railroad merits for d a ' •. corridors, or sections of corridors, can be con- estrons to ask i�ur'rton s a + ,, , a 'qu cent d property i fields. If a corridor or om adja � menta# ,_ +. al cent property is suspected to be a brownfield, thee+ + ave 1 � the state natural resources or environmental exp + .nom# "d ce/rive • protection agency should be contacted to tra„y, a _. estatsacr #n the I.•+ , determine if the property has been identified r t,„ he 'e r+...„;...2„*„,,with the as a brownfield. If this is not the case, a Phase �` tyfor`Testrng t - a a .�.a +ands? ' I, and possibly a Phase II environmental site s they a a a oval Arad ether assessment may be necessary. ��medial ' '',14:41`l,;421',, " a proper, latory v w s� a for those' hus BC S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ;the nn with sari+� + ;471'4.„,',.:_771 If there is a possibility that a trail corridor may sail, r• A�= ter and •Y +� be contaminated, an environmental expert t as�the �;+ '+ on site gofsoilfor should be enlisted to conduct an environmen rdes and a s Ja rcal 4,,,:,...40, tYP $' tal assessment, especially before negotiations lines? e rfiar within+ + for or a urchase of the roper The nature r: d>what tab° „.,„ fir+they cam`+ ,l r P p P Y xt � P �3' of the assessment will depend on the prop- • Does +�x 4i -complywit,- f ationalSafet erty and the potential for contamination, but arty dminisrafion'slazardousWast should include, at a minimum, the equivalent 0" ,;1.";;;;,-I,._._” "� c�� � n a of a Phase I assessment. ce` ' --and safety trah� -4 t'�. is?•d g A Phase I assessment combines research into De a .a . d .ra,-„ - nts di _�: cussger fps ..4*;� a fbaed eguotesfiort • the property's history with a visual inspection. on fh �h grace rn�+estg:a a q Courthouse records,title abstracts, historic ,,,,,;;;; Af0,S aerial photographs and newspaper accounts <n t �' offering background on the past uses of the , ten, site might provide some insight into the 12 bR ti M property's history. Interviews with local government representatives, adjacent landowners, and state and federal officials may also uncover historical events about which the current railroad knows noth- ing. Phase I assessments are not regulated by the federal government, but may be by the state.The scope of work for the Phase I may include: • Investigate the rail line history and locate old stations, crossings, spurs and rail yards. The Valuation Plans and historical aerial photographs for the properties abutting the rail line can provide much of this information; • Investigate site use, identify commercial and industrial stretches and conduct historical re- search of adjacent properties.The Valuation Plans and Sanborn Insurance maps can provide much of the information for the snapshot in time when they were developed. Local histori- cal societies may have information on leading local industrialists and their businesses; • Review the existing federal and state lists of known or suspected disposal sites to see if any are located along the right-of-way; • Inquire with neighbors, fire department personnel or the local historical society for further information on train crashes, accidents and other incidents that may have released chemi- cals; • Conduct a thorough,visual inspection of the right-of-way, looking for: 4. Contaminated soil as evidenced by discoloration, odors, differences in soil properties, pipes, or buried debris; • Signs of illegal dumping of waste from businesses or industry(not simply household trash); • Stressed vegetation or"dead zones"; • Areas of soil run-off, both away from the right-of-way and toward the right-of-way; • Signs of wind erosion sufficient to create a dust inhalation exposure, and; • Signs of public use of the existing right-of-way(condoned or trespassing), such as dirt- bike trails, play forts, beverage cans and fire pits. • Prepare a list of locations that warrant further investigation including sampling techniques, assessment costs and if possible at this stage an estimate of potential clean-up costs. If the Phase I study identifies problem areas, a Phase II assessment may be required. The Phase II assessment can be avoided if the Phase I does not find an area of significant contamination and the corridor owner assumes responsibility for clean-up costs should problem areas need attention.A Phase II assessment involves more thorough testing of water, air and soil samples, as well as a more thor- ough investigation of the site. If contamination is found, a Phase III assessment will review clean-up alternatives, clean-up costs and recommend a remediation plan for clean-up. While the techniques for identifying environmental contamination have become increasingly sophisti- cated,the cost and responsibility for cleanup and restoration are less clear. Federal law targets past and present owners,operators,transporters and generators of hazardous substances.Assigning responsibility and collecting money for clean-up is complicated by the history of contamination and the likelihood that the original contaminators may no longer be traceable, or if they still exist, do not have the finan- 13 f LOG E 71.13. C k r`r cial capacity to pay for clean-up.Although the railroad has certain responsibilities as the property owner, do not be surprised if the railroad's representative wants to include cleanup costs as a negotiating point. Overall, an environmental assessment can cost anywhere from a few thousand dollars to more then $20,000 if extensive soil and water samples are taken over a broad area.The assessment and its results can quickly become a critical issue in negotiations to acquire the property. Before taking title to the property, make sure the purchase contract clearly states who will pay for any environmental problems that have been discovered. Seek warranties and representations from the railroad indicating there is no known contamination, or if that is not the case, disclosing the actual situation and plans for remediation. REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES Once it is determined that remediation is needed, the environmental consultant should prepare an estimate of the approximate costs of alternatives to address the identified contaminants. This cost estimate may be used in negotiations to reduce acquisition costs. If the trail developer owns the land or will be accepting it for a nominal charge,they will want to include the clean-up plan in any con- struction contract for the project. Railroad Ties Generally, salvaging of track and ties prior to construction can be profitable, depending on the market. However, if high levels of contamination are found, this may not be the case. An environmental consultant can help identify licensed facilities that will accept old railroad ties for disposal. In order to avoid liability for illegal disposal, do not reuse the ties on existing properties or allow the public to take them away. On-site burial may be possible if your project includes a large area such as a parking lot.The Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation disposed of ties and contaminated soil under a parking lot built while creating a park on a former municipal dump along the Neoponset River near Boston. Ballast can be used to serve as a sub-base for the new trail. Trail Construction Communities can take several actions to address residual and industrial contamination on rail corri- dors.Taking care of remediation during trail construction can be the most effective means to address contamination. The following is a list of the most common methods for addressing residual contami- nation on a rail corridor. Combining these methods can be an effective way to address residual con- tamination and site-specific contamination associated with industry. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has developed Best Management Practices that promote capping in areas with residual contamination. The most common methods for addressing residual contamination on a rail corridor include: • Cut and Fill—Soil containing high contamination is removed, replaced by clean soil to fill the corridor. Regrading of the site may require fill to be placed in certain areas. See if the design engineer and construction company can use contaminated soil where fill is needed, or for another use such as roadway subgrade, or disposed of in an appropriate manner as outlined by the state's environmental laws. If your corridor is wide enough, you may be able to create vegetated berms on the edges of the trail to contain the contaminated soil. Contaminated soils should never be relocated to areas with high human contact, such as playgrounds, schools or residential yards. (See Case Study 3: Doyle Street Greenway.) 0 Lou rErvi • Capping the Surface—Hard surfaces, such as asphalt and cement, may be used to "cap" or cover and isolate contaminated soil along the corridor. Likewise the use of crushed stone with appropriate depth may also be used.Your consultant or state agency should be able to provide you with guidance on these issues. (See Case Study 2: Betsie Valley Trail.) • Exclusions—In cases where contamination is, or is perceived to be, higher due to due diligence research, a trail developer may choose to exclude a portion of the corridor from purchase and use a separate route alternative to avoid human contact with the contaminated site.This may also be employed as a temporary alternative until a contaminated site may be remediated. (See Case Study 1: Manhan Rail Trail.) • Signage and Fencing—Signage and fencing are used to keep trail users on the trail and protect them from specific contaminated sites. (See Case Study 4:Trail of the Coeur d'Alenes.) • Phytoremediation—The process of cleaning contaminated soil and water with plants. Phytoremediation is best used for contamination in the top layers of soil, where the roots of the plants reach. It may be employed in combination with other techniques. RECOVERING CLEAN-UP COSTS FROM THE POLLUTER If the organization involved in trail development and remediation did not cause the pollution, recover- ing the costs to clean-up the contamination may be an option if the polluter can be identified. Involve polluters as soon as possible so they can be involved and possibly fund investigations and clean-up planning. Document that the plan follows clean-up laws to ensure your organization can seek cost recovery. In order to do so any soil samples collected and tested must have a documented "chain-of- custody" and records must have been adequately kept on how samples were collected and handled. Pursuing polluters can be cost prohibitive and time consuming. If the railroad is the major polluter the best way to handle these costs is during the negotiations of the land transfer. An agency or local environmental attorney can help negotiate conditions regarding environmental clean-up as part of the land transfer. MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Managing risks associated with a contaminated corridor does not stop after construction ends. If contaminated soil is removed,then the problem is eliminated. However if the area with elevated con- tamination was simply capped with a hard surface it will be important for the trail manager to stay on top of maintenance to ensure the trail user is sufficiently protected. Regular maintenance, as well as reconstruction of a trail surface at the end of its life— 15 years for asphalt and 10 years for crushed stone)will be important. In addition, if needed, trail signage and fencing should be maintained. (See Case Study 4:Trail of the Coeur d'Alenes.) More information about trail maintenance can be found in Rails-to-Trails Conservancy's"Trails for the Twenty-First Century, Planning, Design, and Management Manual for Multi-Use Trails," by Charles Flink, Kristina Olka and Robert Seams. 0 LOG 171V1 Yr ,alb . CASE STUDIES SUMMARY The case studies serve as examples of ways communities have addressed contamination. An environ- mental professional and agency contacts can help you evaluate the best approach to your situation. In an effort to gain a more thorough understanding of the impact of discovering contaminants on a corridor, we have selected four rail-trail projects which did encounter some level of contamination and developed in-depth case studies exploring the mitigation measures taken. 0 Lev ITEM o2 of _� CASE STUDY I: MANHAN RAIL TRAIL, EASTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS BACKGROUND The Manhan Rail Trail provides a good example of the barriers that communities must surmount in order to convert an old rail corridor into a multi-use community trail. When complete, this eight-mile trail will run from Easthampton to Northampton, Mass. Four of the five miles of the trail in Easthampton opened in June 2004. The remaining one-mile contaminated section of corridor in Easthampton is currently not open to the public. Typical of many New England communities, Easthampton, Mass.,was a manufacturing city serving the textile, chemical household cleaner and insulation industries. It was also served by a railroad that thrived until the mid-1970s when much of the industrial activity ceased.The Manhan Rail Trail follows the former New Haven Railroad's Canal Division corridor, which paralleled the Farmington canal run- ning from New Haven, Conn.to Northampton, Mass. By the late 1970s changes in the environmental laws and relocation of businesses to places like North and South Carolina, brought about a shift that made the mill buildings largely dormant. By 1991 the Pioneer Valley Railroad (PVRR)—which had taken over all the trackage in the city—instituted a freight surcharge because of poor track conditions.The surcharge drove the last customer using the railroad,the W.R. Grace&Co.'s Zonolite plant, to close.The railroad filed for abandonment of the approximately five miles of corridor in Easthampton in 1992. The Friends of the Manhan Rail Trail formed in 1996 to advocate for the trail. The city of Easthampton approved the purchase of the corridor, and by 1999 the PVRR removed the track and the city acquired the corridor. CONTAMINANTS AND REMEDIATION The primary concern over } ' contamination along the Manhan Rail Trail was at the site of the former W.R. Grace& Co plant, where raw materials (semi-processed vermiculite ore containing temolite asbestos, a suspected carcinogen)were «, converted to insulation.The £ Massachusetts Department of A IN Environmental Protection (MDEP) and the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) began testing the soil along the corridor in 2000.W.R. Grace&Co., agreed to conduct further testing,which showed asbestos contamination extending about 700 feet north and 200 feet south of Wemelco Way along the abandoned rail bed. At around this time,W.R. Grace&Co. entered into Chapter 11 bankruptcy because of the number of asbestos-related lawsuits filed against it. 0 of k The city of Easthampton hired Tighe&Bond, an environmental engineering company,to assess the degree of contamination and recommend a remediation treatment.Tighe&Bond estimated it would cost approximately $260,000 primarily in disposal costs to clean up the contamination along nearly 1,000 feet(40 feet wide)of the planned bike path route. The city of Easthampton is still waiting for funding to clean up the site. The proposed method of remediation is to replace one foot(deep) of contaminated material with clean soil and pave the trail. Simply paving the trail was discounted because the railroad ties are still in place and the city is inter- ested in installing a parallel sewer line. The trail will be fenced and signed in order to keep the users on the trail. FUNDING Initial testing of the corridor was conducted as part of a larger project to test W.R. Grace sites by the MDEP and the EPA. Tighe&Bond,the environmental engineering company that assessed the degree of contamination and recommended clean-up, donated their time to the project,thus reducing costs to the city. Identifying funding sources for remediation of the corridor was difficult. In 2003 and 2004 the City of Easthampton submitted grant applications to the EPA's Brownfields Clean Up program but did not receive funding. However, U.S. Representative John Olver(D-Mass.)announced the inclusion of $750,000 in the new transportation bill to remediate the asbestos and construct the rail-trail,which is still pending. Additionally, in early 2003, the city of Easthampton filed a claim against W.R. Grace&Co. for its failure to clean up asbestos-contaminated soils at the site of its former manufacturing plant on Wemelco Way. The case is still pending. LESSONS LEARNED The first hurdle was convincing the responsible parties that the asbestos should be cleaned up, rather than the alternative of not building a trail and thus not needing to clean the contaminated land. The second major challenge with this project was finding a funding source for the cleanup. Project planners found that the EPA Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup program was a good potential source of funding. Instead, the project is being funded through the next transportation legislation before Congress at the time of this report. The final lesson learned in this project was that better communication between the state agencies would have been beneficial, especially between the state highway and environmental protection de- partments. CONTACT INFORMATION Stuart Beckley Easthampton Planning 50 Payson Avenue Easthampton, MA 01027 E-mail:stuartb@easthampton.org 0 LOG iTE Y Loft " CASE STUDY 2: BETSIE VALLEY TRAIL, BENZIE, MICHIGAN BACKGROUND The 22-mile Betsie Valley Trail is located in Benzie County, Mich., along the shores of Lake Michigan between the communities of Thomasville and Frankfort. Rail use began on this line in the 1880's,first to bring wood to Elberta, Mich.,to fire metal refining ovens and later to carry passengers between the Thompsonville depot and Frankfort. In the 1930's rail car ferry service began from Elberta, allowing rail cars to be shipped across Lake Michigan. In 1980 the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) purchased the bankrupt Ann Arbor Railroad company. In 1982 the last rail car was transported by ferry and in 1985 the train made its last trip through Benzie County. Twenty-two miles of the Betsie Valley Trail are open for use and another mile is still under develop- ment and slated to be complete by the end of 2004.The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)owns the majority of the line and the last two half-mile sections are owned by the Village Alberta and the City of Frankfurt. However, the trail is maintained and operated by Benzie County. Seven miles of the Betsie Valley Trail are surfaced with asphalt, three with crushed limestone (in the Crystal Lake Area), and an additional 12 miles are currently unimproved and are open to snow- mobiles. Concerns over arsenic contamination in the soils of the rail corridor were raised by adjacent property owners opposed to trail development. Beginning in 1988 and ending with a settlement in 1996, adjacent property owners sued MDOT for ownership of the rail corridor along a three-mile stretch of beach front on Crystal Lake.The settlement allowed for adjacent owners to purchase the beach/rail property adjacent to their homes provided they agreed to a lifetime rail, utility and trail easement. The trail location could be relocated provided that 1) it was at the property owner's expense; 2) it would be continuous; 3) have safe curve radius; and 4) have sight distances and meet general safe trail design standards. Once the relocation was approved by the MDNR, a land survey was taken to create the easement language for each property deed. This is being completed now. CONTAMINANTS AND REMEDIATION In May 1999 six soil samples were collected from the middle of the railroad corridor, approximately four to six 1, "? inches below grade. Analysis "Ni' a ! W.TO 1 of the samples showed levels a# of arsenic ranging from 8.4 parts per million (ppm)to 72 ` °°' ppm.This is elevated above Michigan Department of Environmental Quality's (MDEQ)standards for residen- tial direct contact. In June 1999 additional samples were taken from the shallow ground water beneath the 19 LOU war Ip4,1444 ' of idt railroad bed. Results showed that contaminants were not leaching into the groundwater. Soil sample results showed 4,1/4 ft contaminants decreased rap- idly as you moved out from the center of the tracks. Additional testing was per- formed in July 2001 and May 2002.This testing revealed arsenic(8.4-72 ppm)and benzopyrene(0-9ppm)(a Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbon or PAH).The conclusion from these tests was that the three miles along Crystal Lake were contaminated, though there is reason to believe that the entire 22-mile corridor in Benzie County is contaminated at a similar level. Seven miles of the corridor is capped by the trail surface. In the Crystal Lake area,the contaminants were removed and a crushed limestone surface laid. This eliminated direct contact and was cost effec- tive. These sections of trail did not require additional time to complete construction. The contractor was required to follow guidelines on working with contaminated soil, such as ensuring soils did not become airborne during construction. Along the Crystal Lake segment of the trail, contaminated soil was removed in varying amounts. This was done because of the proximity of the contaminants to homes in this section. Homeowners in this section were insistent that the state clean the contaminants out. Excavation of the contaminated soil began in October 2002 and was completed in June 2003 by MacKenzie Environmental. Construction of the corridor has not been completed. For removal of contaminated soils in the Crystal Lake segment, the involved agencies were MDEQ, MDNR, Michigan Department of Community Health, MDOT, Crystal Lake Property Rights Association and MacKenzie Environmental. The surface work in other sections of the trail to cap the contaminates involved MDNR, MDEQ, Betsie Valley Trail Management Council (Benzie *f County), Johnson Hill Land Ethics(land- scape architect), Gourdie Fraser and - " " AIM"' Assoc., (engineering firm), Elmer's Crane and Dozer, and Kramer Contracting. 0 LOU l .( /. :.+ r of/ FUNDING The total cost for clean up, engineering and trail surface(crushed stone)for the 3.3-mile section along Crystal Lake was$750,000. MDEQ, MDNR, and MDOT contributed funding to the project. Construction cost for the capped section of trail did not involve additional expenses because of the contaminants. The cost and process to surface the trail is essentially the same with or without con- taminates. Funding consisted of state and federal grants and foundation and local funds were used to match the grants. LESSONS LEARNED Due to the court settlement for the Crystal Lake segment, adjacent property owners were allowed to relocate the trail. Many property owners did this by moving the railroad ballast stones off the corridor and onto a new location. This spread the contaminants over a much greater area.This required more testing, additional on-site monitoring of the soil removal process, and more costs.The other sections of the trail created no major challenges. Because of the potential health impacts adjacent landowners can be particularly concerned about contamination near their homes. Efforts to educate people in the communities with the facts will be time well spent. Most people will read the information and realize the best course of action is to cap the contaminated earth.The public agency is then responsible for developing and presenting a plan to cap the contaminated soil. CONTACT INFORMATION Sean K. Duperron, CCRP Extension Natural Resources Agent/Betsie Valley Trailway Manager Benzie County P.O. Box 349 Beulah, MI 49617-0349 E-mail:duperron@msue.msu.edu Telephone:231-882-0025 0 LO tr ,fey �5 of y - A CASE STUDY 3: DOYLE STREET GREENWAY, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA BACKGROUND The Doyle Street Greenway is located in Emeryville, Calif., a small community of less than 10,000 people across the bay from the San Francisco.The trail project is part of a larger city-wide renaissance to transform itself from an old industrial landscape with many brownfield projects to a livable commu- nity with vibrant high tech and commercial industries.The 0.4-mile rail-trail follows a Santa Fe Rail- road spur line that once serviced Emeryville, Calif., and Berkeley, Calif. It will be extended by an addi- tional 0.4 miles in order to connect it to other trails. CONTAMINANTS AND REMEDIATION Testing of the corridor began before the city of Emeryville purchased the rail corridor from Union Pacific. Both soil and groundwater testing were undertaken to determine the nature and extent of contamination.The soil sample tests showed higher levels of arsenic(up to 689 mg/kg), lead (up to 3,227 mg/kg), and petroleum hydrocarbons(TPH as diesel at concentrations up to 11,300 mg/kg). It was determined that the entire 't 2,200-foot rail-trail was contaminated. To clean up the site, approximately 2.5 feet across the entire site of contaminated soil was excavated and disposed of, off-site. It was replaced by a layer of clean fill and a combination of hard-surface and greenscape ..,' was chosen as the surface material.This method was chosen because it offered the most thorough level of protection of the public's health and minimized long- term maintenance and liability issues. The remediation process involved the cooperation of the city of Emeryville,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA) Department of Toxic Sub- stances Control,the California Environmental Protection Agency's Regional Water Quality Control Board and Union Pacific Railroad. 1 FUNDING The project cost approximately $1 million and was funded in part by EPA's Brownfields Assessment Dem- y onstration Pilot Program as well as by the city of Emeryville, California State Park and Bicycle Bond y " • Funds, Union Pacific Railroad and Pulte Homes, which paid for improvements adjacent to their developments. 22 LOG iTE , • LESSONS LEARNED A major challenge to this project was developing accurate cost esti- mates for use in negotiations with the railroad. Estimates are difficult to nail down because there are so many different components to such a project that impact the costs, such as acquisition and sampling schedule, and shifting costs of improvements to the private sector through development and design negotiations. In puffing the project together, staff from the city of Emeryville found it useful to engage the various regulatory agencies early in the process in order to avoid surprises during negotiations or after property had been purchased. Much to their advantage, the city of Emeryville can serve as a regulatory agency for less complicated projects, such as this one.The city is very familiar with the redevelopment of railroad spurs because of the large number of them within the city, and therefore is familiar with the special issues surrounding these projects. Project staff also found it useful to have sufficient funding for the project, allowing them to work through various problems that developed during the course of the project. For example, it is difficult to completely characterize the contaminants in the soil and so having flexibility as the project pro- gressed permitting project managers to react to new information as it became available. CONTACT INFORMATION Ignacio Dayrit City of Emeryville 1333 Park Avenue Emeryville,CA 94608 E-mail: idayrit @ci.emeryville.ca.us Telephone:510-596-4356 Fax:510-596-4389 U.S. EPA Region 9 Brownfields Team Telephone:415-744-2237 www.epa.gov/region09/waste/brown/index.html www.epa.gov/brownfields/ 23 .tr_ _iiii a 7 P-ap.,,, /./- _ :27= CASE STUDY 4:TRAIL OF THE COEUR D'ALENES, KOOTENAI, SHOSHONE,AND BENEWAYCOUNTIES, IDAHO BACKGROUND The Trail of the Coeur d'Alenes is a 10-foot-wide, 73-mile-long asphalt trail. It stretches west from the mountain mining town of Mullen, Idaho on the Montana border, along the Coeur d'Alene River in Idaho's Silver Valley to Plummer, Idaho in the prairie lands near the Washington border. As a former Superfund site, this rail-trail presents an extreme case of contamination. Construction for the rail corridor began in 1886 when silver was discovered and the railroad was used to transport ore and other concentrates. Mine waste was used as fill material in constructing the corri- dor and further contamination occurred when flooding carried mine waste from non-railroad source points to other parts of the railroad corridor. Union Pacific(UP) proposed abandoning the corridor in the 1990s and the State of Idaho and the Coeur d'Alenes tribe jointly filed for railbanking. In 1996, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against UP, in which the railroad agreed to pay $30 million to clean up the contaminated corridor. Construction took place between 2001 and 2004. CONTAMINANTS AND REMEDIATION A level 1, complete human health risk assessment, was conducted to determine if trail contamination would cause health risks. Hundreds of sample cores at various depths along the entire length of the right-of-way were taken. Contaminants such as lead, arsenic and other heavy metals were found all along the corridor. Contamination levels varied but tests indicated contamination greater than 30,000 part per million in some places. According to the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), an engineering evaluation/cost analysis determined that the best option for remediation of the heavy metal contamination was to remove and dispose of some contaminated material, lay vegetative barriers and cap the corridor with asphalt. Contaminated soil was removed and replaced by noncontaminated materials on the section of the corridor near Chatcolet Lake on the Coeur d'Alene Tribe Reservation. A total of 175,000 cubic yards of contaminated materials were removed and remediated, approximately 200,000 cubic yards of barrier material were utilized, and 65 miles of 10-foot-wide asphalt capped the surface. Ties were removed, decontami- : i nated and salvaged, and tie dump � � � ��. areas from the railroad operations 4 ., ' `' were cleaned up. Lastly, vegeta- tive, asphalt and gravel barriers were used to control trail user exposure to lead. Trail signage and outreach materi- als are in use to educate and pro- tect the trail user. A brochure can be found at each trail head recom- mending removing dirt from clothes, toys, pets, shoes and equipment before leaving the area. 0 -,p TE of The brochure also warns not to let children play near shore lines or off the trail, and for trail users to carry water for drinking and washing. The agencies involved in the mitigation process included: Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation, Coeur d'Alenes Tribe, Department of Justice, EPA, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Panhandle Health, Army Corp of Engineers, Union Pacific Railroad, counties and cities, Idaho Attorney General's Office and the Idaho Dept of Transportation. FUNDING The entire trail, except for one short section of trail between Mullan and Kellogg which was paved with a $1 million Transportation Enhancements grant, was funded and built by UP under a concent decree that UP en- tered into with the federal govern- ment, the State of Idaho and the �* Coeur d'Alene Tribe. UP's estimated costs are $30 to $40 million dollars. UP is still responsible for long-term flood damage to the trail, soil and asphalt barriers and bridges.They keep track of these costs so in the future the government and UP can negotiate a trust fund to cover these long-term costs. LESSONS LEARNED Trail advocates, including government agencies, faced a long process with many barriers to build a multi-use trail through a superfund site.At the time there were no similar examples to refer to, which would have made the process easier. There were many opponents to the project and it was difficult to coordinate the many agencies and entities involved in negotiating the deal with Union Pacific. CONTACT INFORMATION Leo Hennessy Idaho Department of Park and Recreation PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720 E-mail: Ihenness@idpr.state.id.us Telephone:208-334-4180 ext 228 www.idahoparks.org/pdf/TrailCDAweb.pdf 0 LOG ITE FUNDING AND OTHER RESOURCES ' ' ' This section provides additional resources for federal and state assistance and funding sources. FEDERAL AND STATE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RE- RESOURCES SOURCES (DNR): BROWNFIELD INFORMATION The DNR's Web site provides a wide range of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY information on financial and liability tools in (EPA) order to assist local governments, businesses, The EPA maintains an extensive Web site on lenders and others to clean up and redevelop Superfund information. Pertinent information brownfields in Wisconsin. includes the section on "Laws, Policies&Guide- dnr.wi.gov/org/aw/rr/rbrownfields/ lines"and the section on "Human Health & Ecological Risk."The"Exposure to contaminants" WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF heading under"Human Health &Ecological ECOLOGY:TOXICS CLEANUP PROGRAM Risk" is extremely useful. This is a good example of what states are doing www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm to promote environmental remedial actions. The EPA also maintains information on The Web site provides specific information brownfields. www.epa.gov/brownfields/and regarding statewide policies on toxic substances. www.epa.gov/brownfields/liab.htm www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/tcp/cleanup.html SAMPLE STATE PROGRAMS: FUNDING SOURCES COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,DE- PARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BUREAU OF WASTE SITE CLEANUP. (EPA) The bureau has developed detailed "Best Man- BROWNFIELDS ASSESSMENT GRANTS agement Practices for Rail Trail Conversion." These grants fund activities to inventory, char- www.mass.gov/dep/bwsc/files/railtrail.doc acterize, assess and conduct planning and com- munity involvement related to brownfield sites. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF The performance period is two years. Different ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION: levels of funding are available for assessment BROWNFIELD INFORMATION related to various contaminants, with a total The Web site offers information about brown- application cap of$700,000. For more informa- fields in New York with links to the Brownfield tion see www.epa.gov/brownfields/pilot.htm. Cleanup Program,the Environmental Restoration Program and State Superfund Program. REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANTS (RLF) www.dec.state.ny.us/website/der/bfield/ These grants provide funding for grant recipi- ents to capitalize a revolving loan fund and TEXAS BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT provide subgrants to carry out cleanup activities INITIATIVE at brownfield sites. Revolving loan funds gener- In close partnership with EPA and other federal, ally are used to provide no-or low-interest state and local redevelopment agencies, and loans for brownfields cleanup. Grants are avail- stakeholders, Texas is facilitating clean-up, trans- able up to $1 million and require a 20 percent ferability, and revitalization of brownfields. The match by the applicant. Performance period for Web site provides in-depth information about these grants is five years. For more information federal tax incentives and property tax incentives. see www.epa.gov/brownfields/pilot.htm. www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/permitting/remed/vcp/ brownfields.html 0 . LUG 'ITEM r :( se. 'r~ of VI CLEAN-UP GRANTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND These grants fund actual clean-up activities at URBAN DEVELOPMENT brownfields sites. Funds are available up to COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS $200,000 per site, with a limit of five sites per (CDBG) applicant. It requires a 20 percent match by applicant, and the applicant must own property CDBG grants may be used for a wide variety of that will be cleaned.A minimum of a Phase I projects that improve communities.Assessment site assessment must be completed prior to a and clean up of rail corridors that are being proposal submission.The performance period converted into multi-use community trails may for these grants is two years. For more informs qualify under these funds. U.S. Housing and tion see www.epa.gov/brownfields/pilot.htm. Urban Development administers these grants for designated entitlement communities. Each HEALTHY URBAN COMMUNITIES GRANT state administers the funds for nonentitlement PROGRAM (NEW ENGLAND ONLY) communities. For more information about these funds see www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/ The 2003 grants program integrated nine New communitydevelopment/programs/index.cfm. England programs dealing with toxics, schools, urban environment and more. Projects funded MASSACHUSETTS STATE AND LOCAL targeted communities at risk, sensitive popula- FUNDING SOURCES tions(i.e. elderly and children), assessed and understood environmental and human health COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT FUNDS (CPA) risks, increased collaboration through commu- CPA allows towns and cities to approve a refer- nity-based projects, built institutional and corn- endum allowing them to levy a community- munity capacity to understand and solve envi- wide property tax surcharge of up to three ronmental and health problems, and achieved percent for the purpose of creating a local measurable benefits. Green and open space Community Preservation Fund and qualifying projects have been funded, but no grants were for state matching funds. Funds raised through awarded in 2003 for testing or remediation the CPA may be used for acquisition, creation, along rail corridors being converted to rail-trails. preservation, rehabilitation and restoration of The grants program may change for 2004. open space.Testing and remediation would Check the Web site for details at qualify for funding under this program. For www.epa.gov/region01/eco/uep/grants.html. more information, contact the Trust for Public Land at www.tpl.org. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MASSACHUSETTS BROWNFIELDS TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS (TE) REDEVELOPMENT FUNDS Environmental testing and remediation along a These grants fund testing and remediation on rail corridor may be eligible for TE funds if the brownfield sites, but are currently restricted to project qualifies under the TE category of"Con- redevelopment for economic development version of Abandoned Railway Corridors to (housing, business, etc.).Though cleaning open Trails." However not every state utilizes TE space does improve communities,thus increas- money for these purposes and the project spon- ing the property values and inspiring local in- sor should check with the state TE coordinator vestment and business,these activities do not first. Visit www.enhancements.org for more currently qualify for this funding. However this information about TE and state contact infor- funding could potentially be used for testing mation. and remediation of former railroad yards for redevelopment. 0 LOG ItE J4 cod,a APPENDIX A: SURVEY FORM TO TRAIL MANAGERS — ATTEMPT I AND ATTEMPT 2 Name of trail: Open for use or still under development, or both: If open, surface type: Miles of open trail: Miles of trail under development: County(ies)and state: Please answer the following questions in as much detail as possible: • A brief history of rail use on the corridor and when it stopped. • Any other background that may be useful, relevant, or interesting. • Type of testing done. • Type of toxin(s)found and levels. • Length of trail contaminated. • Method of mitigation and why that method was chosen. • Who was involved in mitigation process(list all government and private entities). • Cost of mitigation. • How long did the mitigation process take. • Funding sources(various local, state,federal assistance programs, and any private monies used). • Major challenges to remediation project. • Suggestions to others to others in same situation /words of advice. • Having gone through this, what would have made this process easier for you, resources that would have made the project easier(more, bigger, easier access to funding sources, clearer regulations, information). • Impact of past contamination and remediation on ongoing maintenance(cost and other- wise). • Contact information (name, organization, address, phone, e-mail, web site). • Please send photos if you have them (before, during clean up, after). 28 STEM Of APPENDIX 13-TRAIL MANAGER SURVEY RESPONSES TRAIL MANAGER SURVEY CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL,AL Extent of testing: Phase I. Test results: Found no contaminants. Comments:Ties taken up by railroad. OLD RAIL ROAD BED,AL Extent of testing: Unknown, railroad went into bankruptcy in late 1880s. Test results: NA Comments: NA TBD,AL Extent of testing:Trail still under development but not concerned as railroad was used to haul lumber. Inspection will probably happen during engineering yet to come. Test results: NA Comments: NA TBD,AR Extent of testing:Trail still under development and no testing has been done as of yet. Test results: NA Comments: NA MOHAVE AND MILLTOWN RAILROAD TRAIL,AZ Extent of testing: Did not survey or test because 1) not aware that it could be a problem because 2) the railroad was in service only a short time and the ties were removed 50 years ago. Test results: NA Comments: NA OHLONE GREENWAY BICYCLE TRAIL,CA Extent of testing: Not aware of any testing, but all city staff who were involved in project are gone. Test results: NA Comments: City recently purchased a siding from the railroad for a park next to the trail.The city did soil testing but no contamination was found. UNION PACIFIC TRAIL,CA Extent of testing: Phase II test. Test results: NA Comments: NA UPPER TAMPA TRAIL,FL Extent of testing: No testing done as part of trail project, but land was acquired five years prior and some testing may have been done then. Test results: NA Comments: NA 0 ARABIA MOUNTAIN TRAIL,GA Extent of testing: Level 1 test. Test results: NA Comments: Corridor abandoned in 1936, not concerned. NW ATLANTA GREENWAY TRAIL,GA Extent of testing: No testing. Test results: NA Comments: Ties removed by salvage company for resale. SILVER COMET TRAIL,GA Extent of testing: No testing. Test results: NA Comments:Ties removed by salvage company for resale. TRAIL OF THE COEUR D'ALENES, ID Extent of testing: Extensive soil testing every few feet and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.The entire 72-mile trail was built on a contaminated area. Test results: Heavy metal contamination found along entire corridor. Soil was removed and corridor was capped. Process cost $20 million to $30 million. Union Pacific paid all expenses.Took four to six years. Comments: NA TUNNEL HILL STATE TRAIL, IL Extent of testing: One area tested for fuel contamination. Test results: Contamination found. Earth removed and monitoring well installed using funds from Leaking Underground Storage Tank program. Cost was approximately $87,000. Comments: NA HASKELL RAIL TRAIL, KS Extent of testing: Visual inspection did not prompt concern. Test results: NA Comments: Ties removed by salvage company. PATUXENT BRANCH TRAIL, MD Extent of testing: No testing was done. Train ceased operation in 1928 and had served a granite quarry. Test results: NA Comments: NA THREE NOTCH TRAIL, MD Extent of testing: NA Test results: NA Comments:Twenty-eight-mile trail appears to be informally open. Respondent indicated that no con- tamination issues are expected as they move forward with development but no reason given as to why not except that the railroad took up the ties when they abandoned the line. 30 II ITEM L G FIND NAME, ME -d- ' Of l Extent of testing: No testing. Test results:There was some concern, but no indication of contaminants have been found. Comments: Railroad stopped operation in 1952.Ties were removed at that time. Sounds as though trail is not open yet(perhaps that is why it has no name). FRED MEIJER HEARTLAND TRAIL, MI Extent of testing: Checked county records for corridor use. Visual inspection conducted during acquisi- tion stage. Test results: NA Comments: NA SKEGEMOG SWAMP PATHWAY, MI Extent of testing: No testing, were not concerned. Test results: NA Comments: NA CENTRAL LAKES TRAIL, MN Extent of testing: Did not test.Trailside vegetation indicates that contamination is not a problem. Test results: NA Comments: NA LAKE WOBEGONE TRAIL, MN Extent of testing: Did a field survey and contacted the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for a listing of any known contamination on the corridor. Test results: No contamination found. Comments: NA FRISCO HIGHLINE TRAIL,MO Extent of testing: Phase 1, concerned about spills from derailments. Test results: Investigation found two underground fuel tanks which were removed. Results were re- ported to board(this trail is under private management). Remediation cost was $15,000 and was split by Burlington, Northern, Santa Fe and Ozark Greenways. Delayed project 11 months. Comments: NA GRANT'S TRAIL,MO Extent of testing: Phase 1. Test results: Asbestos tiles from old building or from dumping were found. Results reported to rail- road and they had them removed. No delay in trail project, no increase in cost of liability insurance. Comments: NA LONGLEAF TRACE TRAIL,MS Extent of testing: Visual inspection and local knowledge. Test results: No remediation required. Comments:Ties removed by railroad prior to transfer of corridor. 0 �-T.s " � r! !V N SOMERS TRAIL,MT Extent of testing: Some sort of testing, apparently. Test results: Mostly creosote. Environmental Protection Agency cleaned up. Comments: NA AMERICAN TOBACCO TRAIL, NC Extent of testing: No testing, not an issue. Test results: NA Comments: Ties removed by railroad. HOMESTEAD, NE Extent of testing: Phase 1. Test results: Results: no indication of contamination. No delay of project. Comments: Ties removed prior to acquisition. MOPAC EAST, NE Extent of testing: Visual inspection. Test results: NA Comments: Ties salvaged prior to National Resources District taking ownership. OAK CREEK TRAIL, NE Extent of testing:Visual inspection and checked spill records. Test results: NA Comments: Ties salvaged before National Resources District took ownership. National Resources Dis- trict feels trail users have little to no exposure to any contaminants that may be there. PAULINSKILL VALLEY TRAIL,NJ Extent of testing: New Jersey Green Acres surveys all property before acquisition. Test results: No contamination was found. Comments: NA SUSSEX BRANCH TRAIL,NJ Extent of testing: New Jersey Green Acres surveys all property for hazardous waste prior to acquisition. Test results: No contamination was found. Comments: NA ASSABET RIVER RAIL TRAIL,NY Extent of testing: Level 1. Test results: Old oil drums had been dumped, but not necessarily by railroad. Comments: Put $200,000 in development fund to cover cost of any needed remediation. Felt that with asphalt surface, a capping would protect against any potential contamination. Did not do any soil testing. CAYUGA-SENECA CANALWAY TRAIL,NY Extent of testing: Not started State Environmental Quality Review Act yet. Test results: NA Comments: NA 0 CLARKE RAIL TRAIL,NY 4*, y/ Extent of testing: Phase 1 at time of acquisition. Test results: No major problems found. Comments: Corridor had been abandoned for decades and tracks and ties were removed. GENESEE VALLEY GREENWAY TRAIL,NY Extent of testing: Literature search. Test results: Not concerned because railroad abandoned operations 25 years ago. Comments:Ties gone when Department of Environmental Conservation bought corridor from a utility. GROVELAND SECONDARY TRAIL, NY Extent of testing: Don't know. Test results: NA Comments: NA LAKE PLACID TO SARANAC LAKE RECREATION PATHWAY,NY Extent of testing:Trail still under development, design stage, no testing as of yet. Test results: NA Comments: NA REMSEN TO LAKE PLACID TRAVEL CORRIDOR, NY Extent of testing: Soil and water samples. Creosote was considered non-mobile and bound to soil immediately adjacent to ties and therefore not in contact with trail user. Test results: No herbicide residue found. No delays. Comments: NA ADENA RECREATION TRAIL,OH Extent of testing: No need to investigate; Ohio Environmental Protection Agency tracks toxic spills and none were found in corridor. Test results: NA Comments: NA BLACKHAND TRAIL,OH Extent of testing: Not known. Trail opened in 1980 and records concerning acquisition and develop- ment are no longer available. Test results: NA Comments: NA HUFFMAN PRAIRIE OVERLOOK TRAIL,OH Extent of testing:Visual examination. Test results: Little, if any, contamination, remediation not required. Comments:This is a rail-with-trail and trail is a good distance from active rail line so no contamination was expected. LOWER SCIOTO TRAIL,OH Extent of testing: No environmental issues. Test results: NA Comments: Rails and ties removed long before they took possession, perhaps 35 years ago. 0 <rEM ‘0,2---, _El SPRINGFIELD BRANCH TRAIL,OH Extent of testing: Trail just getting to planning stage.An environmental assessment will be conducted by the design consultant and will be reviewed by Ohio Department of Transportation. Test results: NA Comments: Railroad removed ties before abandoning corridor. WRIGHT BROTHERS HUFFMAN PRAIRIE BIKEWAY (KAUFFMAN AVENUE BIKEWAY),OH Extent of testing: Visual inspection and soil samples. Test results: Finding of no significant impact. Comments: Investigation took about three months.This is a rail-with-trail and the trail is 20 to 30 yards from active line. SPRINGWATER ON THE WILLAMETTE,OR Extent of testing: Phase 1 conducted before purchase. Test results: Result: No cause for concern, capping would provide any needed protection. Comments: NA ALLEGHENY RIVER TRAIL,PA Extent of testing: Site issued Categorical Exclusion by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Test results: No contamination found. Comments: Railroad history provided no reason to be concern. CLARION-LITTLE TOBY RAIL TRAIL, PA Extent of testing: Not aware of testing, issue not raised. Test results: NA Comments: NA ERNST TRAIL,PA Extent of testing: Did not test. Issues were discussed but were not a concern. No obvious problems. Test results: NA Comments: Railroad abandoned about 30 years ago. GREATER HAZLETON RAILS TO TRAILS, PA Extent of testing: Trail not open yet. Phase 1 test.Were concerned because area is a superfund site. Test results: No major toxics found. Capping, berming, phytoremediation, soil recycling, soil disposal all used on broader site. It cost$15 million to clean up entire site but trail is only very small portion and not actually in the superfund area. Comments: NA MONTOUR TRAIL, PA Extent of testing: Soil testing. Test results: No sign of contamination found. Comments: Most ties were gone when they took possession of corridor.Those that were left were put into landfills, some were recycled, a few were burned until they learned that they should not do that. 0 LUG iTl9� of SANDY CREEK TRAIL, PA Extent of testing: Site was issued a categorical exclusion by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation because there was no reason to believe that contaminants were present in any significant amount. Test results: NA Comments: Railroad hauled coal from 1906 until 1980's. No evidence of dumping or contamination other than occasional coal car accident. HISTORIC UNION PACIFIC RAIL TRAIL STATE PARK, UT Extent of testing:Tested air, soil and water for the first 3.5 miles out of Park City of the 28-mile trail. Test results: Specific findings considered privileged, but generally found traces of heavy metals from mining and processing of ore. Comments: Remediation effort was capping of trail. Delayed project 1.5 to two years. Findings did not impact liability insurance. W&OD TRAIL,VA Extent of testing: Soil testing for arsenic. Photo shows spraying. Test results: No trace of arsenic found. Comments: NA D&H RAIL TRAIL,VT Extent of testing: No testing. Plant growth on corridor was robust. Test results: NA Comments: Issue was of no concern to developing agency until eight years after trail was built when a citizen asked about the issue of contamination.Vermont Agency of Transportation was no concerned, no investigation. TBD,WA Extent of testing: Corridor in city ownership for at least 11 years. Respondent unsure of history, as far as she knows, no testing was conducted. Test results: NA Comments: NA 400 STATE TRAIL,WI Extent of testing: Phase 1. Test results: NA Comments:Ties sold for salvage. BADGER STATE TRAIL,WI Extent of testing: No testing; no sign of contamination. Test results: NA Comments:Ties removed by contractor and resold. ELROY-SPARTA TRAIL,WI Extent of testing: Phase 1 Test results: NA Comments:Ties sold for salvage. 0 LUG 'TEM • LA CROSSE RIVER STATE TRAIL,WI Extent of testing: Phase 1. Test results: NA Comments: Some ties were sold, some buried, some left on site. SOUTHWEST BIKE PATH,WI Extent of testing: Phase 1 and Phase 2. Test results: Found arsenic and chromium above regulatory limits in all 10 borings, plus lead in one boring. Results reported to Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Wisconsin Department of Transportation. No material was removed from site, rather all soil would be covered with either as- phalt or topsoil and vegetation. This solution added little, if any, extra cost. Fees were covered by a Transportation Enhancements grant that was awarded to build the trail. This process of testing and remediation did not result in any project delay because these findings were foreseen and thus the time to deal with them were included in the original project schedule. Comments: Ties were disposed of at licensed landfill. SUGAR RIVER STATE PARK TRAIL,WI Extent of testing: No testing,trail developed in 1973. Test results: NA Comments: Ties were piled and rotted. TBD,WI Extent of testing: No contamination encountered. Test results: NA Comments: NA MEDICINE BOW TRAIL,WY Extent of testing: Environmental assessment ongoing. Test results: NA Comments: NA 0 APPENDIX C: CASE STUDY SURVEY FORM Ns Name of trail: Lam° ` ATE Open for use or still under development, or both: = If open, surface type: "`=�— a of Miles of open trail: Miles of trail under development: County(ies)and state: Please answer the following questions in as much detail as possible: • A brief history of rail use on the corridor and when it stopped. • Any other background that may be useful, relevant, or interesting. • Type of testing done. • Type of toxin(s)found and levels. • Length of trail contaminated. • Method of mitigation and why that method was chosen. • Who was involved in mitigation process(list all government and private entities). • Cost of mitigation. • How long did the mitigation process take. • Funding sources(various local, state, federal assistance programs, and any private monies used). • Major challenges to remediation project. • Suggestions to others to others in same situation/words of advice. • Having gone through this, what would have made this process easier for you, resources that would have made the project easier(more, bigger, easier access to funding sources, clearer regulations, information). • Impact of past contamination and remediation on ongoing maintenance(cost and other- wise). • Contact information (name, organization, address, phone, e-mail, web site). • Please send photos if you have them (before, during clean up, after). 0 ? - .....M APPENDIX D LEXIS SEARCH CRITERIA AND EXCLUSIONS Access to certain freelance articles and other features within this publication (i.e. photographs, classifieds, etc...) may not be available. U.S. newspapers must be listed in the top 50 circulation in Editor&Publisher Year Book. Newspapers published outside the United States must be in English language and listed as a national newspaper in Benn's World Media Directory or one of the top 5 percent in circulation for the country. EXCLUSIONS EIU publications are excluded from all subscriptions. DPA(English language file) (file: DPA) The Straits Times(file: STRAIT) Business Times Singapore(file: BUSTMS) Business Monitor News(file: BMINWS) Due to vendor restrictions the following sources have been excluded from group files in web products. Aerometric Information Reporting System;AIRS Institutional Investor Publications; IIALL Annals of Neurology;ANN Leaking Underground Storage Tanks(LUST)Site Annals of Plastic Surgery; ANPS Records; LUST Comprehensive Env. Response Compensation & National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Liability Info. System; CERCLS Facility Information; NPDESF Dimensions in Health Care; DHC National Priority List Descriptions of Hazardous DM News; DMNEWS Waste Sites; NPLIST Emergency Response Notification System; ERNS National Priority List of Hazardous Waste Sites; EPA Civil Enforcement Docket; EPADKT NPLDSC Facility Index System; FINDS No Further Remedial Action Planned; NFRAP FIFRA&TSCA Tracking System; FTTS Potentially Responsible Parties(PRP) Superfund Hospitals and Health Networks; HOSP Enforcement Tracking System; PRP IDD Merger and Acquisition Reports—Archival; RCRA Corrective Action Record; CORACT IDDMA Resource Conservation&Recovery Information IDD Mergers and Acquisition Database— System; RCRIS Canada—Archival; IDDCAN Solid Waste Site Records; SWS IDD Mergers and Acquisition Database—Euro- State Priority Lists; SPL pean Reports—Archival; IDDEUR Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics; SGO IDD Mergers and Acquisition Database—US Toxic Chemical Release Inventory;TRIS Reports—Archival; IDDUS Underground/Aboveground Storage Tank Site IDD Mergers and Acquisitions Database—UK Records; USTAST Reports—Archival; IDDUK World Financial Markets;WLDFIN 0 kit g if A L. -I, QD -DART TRAIL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE RESPONSE TEAM A Service of Rails-to-Trails Conservancy RAILS TRAILS CONSERVANCY Rails-to-Trails Conservancy • 1100 Seventeenth Street N.W., 10th Floor • Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel: 202-331-9696 • Fax: 202-331-9680 • www.railtrails.org DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING LOG ITEM 2400 NW 80TH ST#114• SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98117 vt- (206)632-3123 Slh e1.1/4..; wvnt C�n< '�ti^ Peig( Of "°""�---- January 31, 2009 Owen French Restoration Coordinator North Olympic Salmon Coalition Suite 205 B West Patison Street Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 RE: Soil Characterization Report Discovery Bay Former Building 1 foundation area Discovery Bay, WA Mr. Owen, Enclosed is a copy of the report documenting the soil sampling (characterization) of the soil around the former foundation of Building 1. On January 16, 2009 Donna Hewitt of DLH Environmental Consulting (DLH)collected 10 soil samples from the Building 1 -foundation area. The soil samples were collected using a backhoe that was provided by and operated by the North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC) personnel. An archaeologist associated with the restoration project t of Discovery Bay was also present. The intent was to determine if diesel or heavy oil impacted soil is present in association with the former use of the building. During previous studies of the site oil staining was noted in and around building 1. The current Washington State Department of Ecology(WDOE) cleanup levels for diesel and heavy oil are 2000 ppm. Based on laboratory results heavy oil was confirmed in some of the samples . A review of the laboratory analysis chromatograms the lab technician informed DLH that the material is most likely old motor oil. This material will need to be excavated and disposed of at a permitted facility. The closest permitted facility is the Olympic View Transfer Station located outside of Bremerton Washington. Once the soil have been excavated a followup of confirmational soil sampling should be conducted to make sure all impacted material has been removed and disposed of properly. You can call Olympic View and they will send you the proper forms to be filled out in order to dispose of the soils. They will need copies of the laboratory analysis and additional accounting data. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 632-3123. Sincerely, DLH - viror tintal Consulting .. Donna Hewitt L.G. � SOIL CHARACTERIZATION REPORT 44, LTV I TEM Pap of 3 BUILDING I FOUNDATION AREA DISCOVERY BAY WASHINGTON SUBMITTED TO: Owen French Restoration Coordinator North Olympic Salmon Coalition Suite 205 B West Patison Street Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 PREPARED BY: DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 2400 NW 80th Street PMB # 114 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98117 SUBMITTED BY: DONNA HEWITT JANUARY 31, 2009 DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 TABLE OF CONTENTS LOG ITEM 1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION �� 1 2.0 METHODS OF FINAL INVESTIGATION 1 3.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 1 3.1 Soil Conditions 1 3.2 Hydrocarbon Testing 1 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 2 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2 6.0 LIMITATIONS 3 TABLE A - SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 2 APPENDICES APPENDIX A -Site Map, Site Sketch, Site Photographs APPENDIX B -Laboratory Reports, Chain of Custody Forms DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 L(XI ITEIVI NOSC 44, January 31, 2009 Discovery Ba Restoration Project Page 1 of 3 1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION During previous studies of the discovery bay site oil staining was noted around Building one. In addition railroad ties and old foundation timbers possibly treated with creosoted had been noted. The building was torn down and the site is undergoing restoration. Due to the possibility of diesel or heavy oil impacted soil sampling and laboratory analysis was conducted. Ten locations associated with the building foundation were chosen and soil sample collected from test pits that were dug using a small backhoe. 2.0 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION Soil samples were collected from each test pit by DLH. ( site sketch Appendix A). The samples were placed in sterilized glassware furnished by the project laboratory. In an effort to minimize the possible loss of any volatile hydrocarbons that may have been present in the soil, the samples were stored in an iced chest until delivered to the laboratory. All EPA-established sample-handling protocols, including chain of custody procedures, were observed during the course of the project. Laboratory results and chain of custody forms are located in Appendix B. 3.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 3.1 Soil Conditions Site soils consisted of sand and mixtures of sand and gravels associated with tidal deposits and tidal fluctuations and appeared to be mostly native along the northern and northeastern sample areas. However, in areas of TP-7 and in 2 exploratory trenches, non-conforming soils which are indicative of disturbances of native sands and soils and possibly imported materials were noted. This is confirmed by the presence of asphaltic material consisting of 1" thick lenses of what appears to be an old oiled road bed. This material is not continuous and may be old fill material. 3.2 Hydrocarbon Testing Soil samples were analyzed by Friedman & Bruya Inc. Of Seattle, Washington using Method NWTPH-Dx for diesel which includes heavy oil. Results are located in Table A and reports in Appendix B. DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 LUG ITEM NOSC cetjet 1 of/ January 31, 2009 Discovery Bay Restoration Project =- Page 2 of 3 TABLE A Confirmation Soil Sample Analytical Results SAMPLE # SAMPLE LOCATION ANALYSIS Diesel Heavy oil all depths are approximations Results results in PPM .f • ►� 11609-1 Test Pit (TP) 1 © 3 feet (ft)below ground NWTPH-DX < 50 ppm < 250 ppm I- - •• •1 •- • i _ 1 . ••I •Sill 11609-3 TP area 3- soil along concrete foundation NWTPH-DX 4,200x 14,000 ppm • - .i • -• •- 'u . 11609-4d Treated wood in and around foundation, NWTPH-DX 48,000x 380,000ppm (d=dilution) ..k- ... - .1j• - •I•- .00 - . � •- P C► t .• < I .. 0 < 250 PPM •1�-• Tom • () •"-;" •• \ ' ■- A • . < / • • 11609-7 TP7 lense of what appears to be old road NWTPH-DX 3,000x 5,200 PPM bed or oily soil and gravel composite. Found appx. 2 feet below surface. Lense of material is about 1 inch thick and is not • ', • • �•-: P: t •• NA - . < I •• < I • .�� . 1 •-• P• • I •• ► A -r. < • ..m < • P. k 11609-10 TP10 © 2-4 ft (bgl) composite of soils NWTPH-DX 740x 2,300 PPM along trench line. NWTPH = Washington Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Dx = Diesel extended to include heavy oil ND = None Detected ppm = Parts per million x = The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel(refer to laboratory data)and is most likely old motor oil. No other peaks of potentially other materials not associated with diesel and heavy oil was noted. DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 LUG ITEM NOSC January 31, 2009 Discovery Bay Restoration Project 41.1. Page 3 of 3 4.0 CONCLUSIONS • Soil sample analysis confirms heavy oil (most likely motor oil) in several locations above the allowable limit of 2000 ppm. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Since the soils in the area are impacted they will need to be excavated and disposed of at a permitted facility. The closest permitted facility is the Olympic View Transfer Station located outside of Bremerton Washington. 6.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. Recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based on evaluation of technical information made available and reviewed during the course of this survey. The results are for specific area characterized and does not relate to any other portion of the subject site property. Our work product and judgements rendered meet the standard of care of our profession at this time. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made concerning the professional conclusions and recommendations included in this report. DLH Environmental Consulting shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were withheld, concealed, or not fully disclosed at the time this evaluation was performed. The underlying philosophy in formulating the conclusions and recommendations was to reduce uncertainties regarding the property and pertaining to environmental hazards, to the degree possible. Therefore, the results of this assessment should be viewed as reasonably accurate estimates, given the project limitations of the existing environmental condition of the property. This report is for the exclusive use of the North Olympic Salmon Coalition and their representatives. If new information becomes available as a result of future site work, which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., DLH Environmental Consulting reserves the right to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 LOG JTE APPENDIX A SITE MAP SITE SKETCH SITE PHOTOGRAPHS r 4,Iii Sri r • •': DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206417.4 MW f : wuaw.au LAG* iTEM . ,.;,,,,,.., a o /, N F- o 0 0. ! 1 ,..>"‹. g ,...," ...... z Qr ! a CD 1 \' 8_ 1\ 0\ \ cz '''''1/4-'..'''''''''''-i(1) 1 1 \ L .a 1 1 J ,p 1 �� ' i 0� A2 u I AC U Wt r 1 o J o }Z1' 0.V4` w ,-lac o I 'r 4%: cam r- I !-1 a a !z i 11.1 ki'",:',4 '- 1 / of m . 4 I ! :F t I c ce z \ z -F-` a ` 1� Q3 I 1 C c. 0 r Q •— �, C, Q C >u Lt! N 0 J' Z'a 0 z ��' � � �' 1/16/09 13 ITEM .411...... '___..,__.....m } ., '� 2 ' .a b$ , Y ,. • , � , �' r�s aka ✓ „.;c a. , "" � e w.a+" bs s � � a - 4, ' A.''''',ii...fr.',i',,--,#'..',.,' �a . a 9 •Via. . a �� �� i _ ` m�.4`., ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT NG SEA1TLE, WASHINGTON 20 -63- -31 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1/16/09 ..,. . .......a: •,......ii....,. ix......., ,.: :•—:••70,.....,- . " ,.. - • :ITEM •,..,-w.,..r•-,Alls......i.: .,.. L,..,!,..• 74_, ,...... . . ,..i,, •• • .. . #'1. .41.61. lf,''','•:: • ,S....-4 ':' . ..;s.-. • i'.^..;,.7 "r!r.A.-‘,.. .. 5-4"of ' • • . . -• .P .1, • :, • Al • '" i .• wa•A4 *- 'Air ' . , 144i, t-v-,-,;,,,,,,,t.ir. -:',,,t,v1.5;• 0-'7 . r ,, ,,... ..,..... ,.,. .. "..._ ,„,.;:. ._... .: ... .. .viz:,...A.,...-„sorrt,....r.4. • .„....... .......,:tu1,..,...1.,..,....., „,„7,..,.: ,,, „ ,:* jk*- :$-*';\^',;.Y•-• .!.4 -',''•••*4g IlL2,1k :- +!,,...«,..* '4.' '*,P'"' -C. '-..' ,S•V*;`'.44..;,.,4 -.yr:.,'*•.;-**,:'.''..-...11N7',4I'4',:3:';';‘:. -44. 4■.*: '''t..: . , • ',II * 1... .**,t's*,•!....7-77`;,qIg••• :,+•4,, `.,•*,,...-..:"., „. „-', . .. , .1,1 ...ti.,..,,J. . , 1 ,,,..,,,,s4::..7.x:'''::••••• • 4.f.t.....; ir::!:.:. tr,....'.1, .. -.•.:'... .,•;,',,'.::, _ „..,,, ,,is, ,,,k.4,::-:-0, ..7,-,;,-;,,,t --.:;-, .- " "ifV‘7 , 2. - , 5ivt:•••°:k...t.'7,• -.•• ';••:'•,. ,....,;::•''''':":;"..; •-••,,..1%.,"1*.frt.'-..:'•:•.•; 4- ---c--•••-.1.4-v• -.'"-*/-*.,00.--...1t7-;-,t-•-_,.- :1-..-:- - ...• `--,:--•;4-=-•-:-*-,(1,,k-'1-r-"--"1-* -,7-7-0., -,- - '"' '•' 1—O.. 66. -' -,-:' ')"1' ,.e• : —--,-- % -,.., .... ; „tik li., ,„-.•,....- .:.•::'''',..t.., .•..•.•rl.,.'•'".. 1:4„...4.....4.5.,:•;;;‘,,.. '•"•*, • !**1.',...1-Y.": ',.,•••••■s •. .. . ,:',.:',;•,',,,...,,,i;„,:is,4.,.V... .....6::. ,•,%,„., -.,. ..,:z., f,*i.:..,., ' ,•',';,.,.; t * 1r, ',..,,,....i4.•■-',*.,c,•. li,.. ....:.'3, ,... .4i.. • .:..•s: ; '.0' t'•1,7;.: .' . „..,.... . ,. t ',,' '4.4.%':' '.. •'•..• f r: . *'E .''' '.;.+,L*,1.C.4'' ." 4'•. •.*)'''''Zfilt; .........: :4'.' ''' el f. '*-"-':',,,'; *,' --,-...,:'•'',.,, it ' --;..'•• .-, ,,, ',"., * ' , "- 4 -' ,-;.',"•0„:,-t=,:*.1„10,4 i . , ••• '1..,•:F..s...„."..V:20 412? ,!.....li V.,,,s,..':;.,-• •: 4,11Y41,:g. tl.: *4 -• 4:1,':‘ ;.-^•:-.1**--.-''..-- '.-/v... ' . t.., 3 . .,:lit,,r:...i.,..e.,BP.,1'...,.".,,,,,, '.:1;;;:,:.•:,..-7•.,....:.• Ijk",.. .. *..4.'."'...'";:ek 1.,..•....'!,....f.: 1 '••71;41:*,.1.4 1 •:44 1.'-',..i.,4;,?''':.. •''''........• ''''': . ';''.;,;' ''" ''s...';:61 ' -..r,t?',10.-•,,,,,; , , . 1:7.1.% ',1',A,' . .- -'., , ,,z 4 t.:-..,,, ,.,,,I.'..i..,,/..,4 .-.,,i,,,,, gc, ,„4„4.-+., -0,..*:....%; . .. „ . 7.---:,.., .,,, = .. .a." •i 46. A e "4 •... t * '.•,..1:' ':•itt k,,''; ..i•-•-at-.-,*, ••,‘...??..-',4-'- "•.‘,.._ ,.. ',16.- -,--/,,',..14: , ,f,4:-. -/ 4`,.:11:1,...,...:Q. ,' .4. 1. ,---n•,•: •••••;*,..- „• ' '• .:.,1,, ,, , - r.44, i ., i ...,Z 104 •*,' ---: :4'. .,...:,.....' - . ''' ,,, , ,,, ' ' ''''r'",-:: , -, * ,•`--`,...../'--'....„,-',.-..4 'v....4.- ",,,..' ' ' , • • '-' ''.:•=u..4-- .. : :4-,.....:Zre..,..V ' — ,:t,"4..,,.'.1.E. • , :,......1.4,,V alt„Cae.7."- 4 , 7".*:••••rytii0S 1.,:...,. '''' ..!illo ...°.Na. ...**' `''. ' *•5. . 71:ae".4 NC;'.:°;''' (I- ' *"0 '• .•(••,* 4.1, ...-' *. rtoklig, "*''''• . , ti. . a 4' Air .•,, ..„- .. '•:, • .•..)...-•• -4.•--- - • *f-,;,-- - 3/' - •It!' :,..:2 ••• •• "••"•,■■•••.t.,'Ill.:, * . t. *'.'•• „ :...1'; +, . *,,... '' 5,0 I 1 •ti;'• 4;„ Jr • . , 5 ; - ..... . 401*• *.«;,.,..4..;04. '7 r ik4.' .km, ....:,,ior"•:...--,,iiimprurzlfa , .-1 ' *....if:R;i• • :- kiK4.240414.,-:-...'",c:r.:"' • ...,,___ .. ... . v, t I, p..., t . RC . •i 1.4. ... ,....,, '4.•?• ..: •*4*-2.:. - it , • ' '' :7•77'),:74.k : . er , _ , •,..,........^: i- ''' • ' l'',.=-1D.'..-7,1.../.. i':::'.......!1...- . '-':'•— s . ,.,.., . .. ......, - • :......1x 11.,•*11111. , p,h.,- .. .474 4,,,,,,,, ,,,,. . .. ) DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATrLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1/16/09 ; . a .\,,, ...,,,At , �~ - - LOG E, __742.‘Ls,_,...., ; � r. 4,� ' vi''' . " ii,',.;ei 4,,,,,,,,.4.6....._.9f./ .3 • .1a!-T ,(� . 1'. c'i's'. tf, • a1 ... .. t:- . ma : 44 tiiii;r tdF 4 a _ m 3�,r,4"- f. . .. ,i ' .. ! '. i ..:i. 4. �..? '1:. ..x.111 . �� 1 t K < 1P , `yam-'�'�i,� ; 4 ---.. x� '• +.. " .,. r. 't 71- 9 4.- "ri^ M�$ ✓7f"� '•. # N.ri ♦ � •7,A,*... 'ems,• srt 'r • tea n.:1 "'tea "*.. tt+�' .K ' 4 e "..• rte'' de •'fi: a ';•. _, �,y4 01 = ;.�. i� = ':.l+f. r'�'r '.,« .»v * ,.ilt'�. ?�,!�{nr"y. rY' .. w ri :;p. .:y >�°'l,-s- " " .gym '. ,•�' —... 3,.f w,"" < ,may:''1,*4`.'w<:» ..sir + x 3.. .,.v.'. Jr mss'. � %v i y *-1..-.;,_r.X t 2> n r'r, .;e:' . .�.*',3 3' t f • ' '+'' - + � + .tom >. -le..'i' ! i+ ....::',,/ .r; ya�i �w t .. ,"rte iw., .: d .;r �....•!.'.'µ DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-31.23 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1/16/09 La(ici "ITEM- ‘-';-• .4 0 f....a..? - a.., ... ,. ..J.:. -..., 4 O ,,,,,.,4 i .0• -' : ‘•le A'ff. ' ,tV''' •1.i:;‘40 • '. ...*;‘,..,7 III ,7•1<,. 44,,,,00'. ',.lz,i ,•44)' .. ,„4444,12 MINN : ,,.‘1„.7,r. ,,i ';...,r*7 ''-..-, - e,,- 1 r'',''''',.....!''' ,,. . ',...., , '- -:'424 '';.'. : ,.....it '"-.1-• 2 ' ' ,4,,,,,4..:..„ .A', .4.•, .', 4tTtt 4, :Ii,t,,,••'''''. 'Se 4,p • / Z_. ' law , . ,,$ • , ,. .,„,..,.„....._, .,.. ,._ • i loll . '41,,ku ',WIM,-,k,e„, e "..*14374',.,,:l..0.*4....- . .7.•••:, li•It*, . '4- -41 41411111FPF• -,'- -.4.. 7‘ ':at-,'1'. :-. 4- .,..=;;;•e*' , ''' 4,-.1 Al2,Alr 7. ;',. ., :....,-- .;.,.'" ... • re .•••••., --.. A.-. ,.... 4'4 . A ..... . ,A , .. .,. , •,- ..,..ta..,_,.....,,,, -_ .. .. ,....._, _,.•_. :,,,,,,,,.,__ ....,,...,,,,,,,,,. _-- . _ ,-.......... ....._,:,,,......„,, ., ..... . ..., • , . . „...,....., ..„,.. . • ..., _ t ,:i , ' • ,,--\ . •• • 4-.'•.- 41.,. . ''' :A .1;14 ('‘.'".•it.`":0%.* i." ->,-..--.-1'`--1. i •- , v . :-!:..-„.. i , , rg- -1. 411 ..• t 1_ ' 1,' , , •1"..„„ .' /-44 4''' .:IL. -•'_,>. '. .0 2.' - if y A., 0 - ,°C4t'VN.,:. t• .1, I ki <4 t:is. '' „Alf. ..„. 4 ,,,,...,...... ,„..,....,..... .. • ,.., ,ts., .. . :,r. ....., !' -- ''' ,- „,..-C3A."4,1*.. ., A- ''-1.-''' 4,i .'. , ,•-1-V 4 wor; ...w.s.).,,, . . , . ' / '4'l•r" '-- . l'-'-,,,V•A%' _;.k..ES: , .'' , „," - r ' •V''''\‘‘,. ,,--/C''''''' * '..4.#'; "4%', A /I -- ,t, .— '. --7'4;-?'.1,,,t'.1., ..., 4' , ", 4..z..• ' ' .0.-'4 '7'. ' * P - - .,- -„, ' ...sr.e 4"Z. 7 __ ,,4.- ,t."t• .03._,„ , - ,. .A . . ' --.7"-.r--‘• zg-',...1.; - _ r- .-,. ' 4 * •-,o- ,., `,, -- '",',T.::-.- '''',,,,-''` * -40...4—1, -' ' ii..,..or"„---z'''ftit' • ,,-..- ,, ' , - -- 01,1", ''-- ..-',.__ --.4,:...-.„, A+ .,-..*.."-' -:„,c-,..' >,-., 4-.-..* , 4, _ ' ;4-71,`, 'k:./'- 'e'''.. •,,,.k:,? - ,,1101" . AZ V.tilike.- ' -‘-%«46,* ‘''''''‘I 'r.',,,,:?'7 4.Z.-44,- ' • '. -lit'" A. :`3' - Vetl#4. Vt"V Art3 '4 Noss, D L H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE/ WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 ,„.,.:•.„...‘":„.:•::::::::::•:••••:.:49-------' ' 1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ' Oi '' i-1 P'IP 1/16/09 ,,a l,r,,,,,_,,., - ...: Clf ,,- -3 . , . . .. , ..::::,:::.:7...,... .. .. .. . : .., . .. .......... .......::.. .............. ..:. ...... . . . .. — ..,..0"''''..,"•Iii, 1 ••iii•Sitc -mqz.2-4-:A .................,-.. • •• ,.......:.:: .,......, • o. :' It:.• '. • •.•..•••' .. . ''' — ....... . ........._... .1.... .ge. .7.::;r4D-;•:',2-'13. •• • • • . • . ...,:„..„7,,..:.:„,.„,:., ••' •41ti.i"Z%;. ' -. . ............ -• : .'• q;.''''' •7.4.i. 9% .. .. . ........ • - 4 . ,....,...,..• • r , . ••••••::6::••••:....• .,,f...):/0 • .....• : ,/,....,-.r. . .v. ,....„..• ... . ....... -...*:. ... -• 1 .. . '..:Y.'..5.,•:".;.• lf• J.$::.:„•••. . ,. ...... ::::::::::., ,. ......,4 . 116:' ' - . • - '—:i '•$1'.'f—;',-,- ',I;'r . ... ft.,':'"::. 41 AB:: „. ••• •••• .....,.. :4 vo:• •1:. '..;;..,:i.:5,1:,.„ ' • ' ' • - •-, • --.,,. f'..;•,,■■'...' f . ''''' .,.. 'S'.« ' ''*? .1 •, :. .:.:...,_.:..”z.::.; ,;:;?.". k,,....,......„..:0-1.' ' • ,''• „, ..,,' .. 4Vf f:'2..").,1::1`,:4*..1,;"'tL'-,..'''',,k':••••••• ' '4:;?.?‘ ... **/#4 '' '. • ;:• .• ' • "7'•••• •---"-•' •;••:••••••••:•":'::-'".'"'-- '--I'' ---- ' ',:t, "' -•'''.. .* ',',. !",ti,.....,.."-. .‘:.''.4..%. 'k• .,,, •..-,-. -% i 1 ,,•':;* .,-,-.., .4 -,.. . . ::::. • • ' .."- ..'' • ".'w.:4;1'.*AV-• - , , , ' '. ''., • • • . .-• • •::;• '' .N#116 * . . •.,.... d....-..:....:..-41.•'. •;•-• .;?.:2'. . s; . ..... •j • '',,fr, • .4. • ••'••••••'• --' 5.- • ' --'.. •:::4111111.M1 -'-• .;")ts.' • .• ••...::. - ..rA„..r.... .---,-. .,;.;:i;:•....;• ,--*1 ''''.'.;k7.1$•,04'or'.7-•-1*. **--..* ':'• '''''•'-••.:''. '''''''„;;Ak. • '•-` . yt,;',,41-••,';',".--"•.":"...IVI„,"..Ift",4t,„).7. ..„.„.•, - . . . •C4? • •, .,. • •••• • •' . ••' • '7•Z,.1•Ali.l• :Jj°11.•••'f•A.1.;*4',:ilYik ./•;.• ..• ,....••••• '''• •• • ••fr.:„ •.•V:.......• .• ,.•••?......t. ...,• •"i. •'•:•K• i' ,........:) ,: • •, • ,je,:•• :•• •••••:'•':::•••'''•.••'..' a. •••i•••.•:•i'•••111.'.•,.. •f• ''..•IP :••.'''' ''...••.•Q•;•':•;.•:••..;'' •••.I%• :'ZI''.•:•:'.3.'.i,,,iii;;•••••.A• P I • , S;',::',+4,,,::, • ,r .. 4.: '•:•',.,,,.:;.„,..earlf...,.4.4,r*,:,,,,ii•I.C(.44":16),44t, • .:tt.W.,,t ,.,14..„t',:# &I'641.;,;....itisg•..,1.!.. •• " . i•: ;—"''' .1i..- 7... . '.1',t:1',,,, .../14,..•.,,,:.1..4.. .4.1:.:;Ak: '",• ." ..., ... `----,;: or •••.,•. ''. 4,49,e'•••:,::,...E"'.., ...,'' :' ...::::t• ,4:''''';','' •',ft,'..:• ..4X.'..•$1?1. ••: . ...i..'• • •47;•,:i li.;i;;Atti•.„x . # ...''''i', .,..,,I.- •' ' ",,,;,.-•• •..'-'•-4i'-'.0---;..•_7' ---'.. ;';.../jet. ,, ',.,es, ,A7:5111r&o.S.,-._..'"L;,,'f.s,u-,.;'-.. 4,,,, ,„:::".;i.- --.--"'- 'ef.,._A,..44,zt,;:',,,*:•,i,, h.,,, ',.',4 v.,;:, .:. :.,r"Nd,:...k . ..- . ...-_,,,,, .---7...1...!:,„,',.. s- . • ,_,•"-;4,,,,,,,:,-..,,,,.,-, -,fi..., ;..st.Ict,;!;i72--, -7-;:,;,-,x4:4:-,„__-__,-., -,.--.:1.„,..,-- -.. .14,....,-„,,,,--.416,--,-....,:,-# .. .,,,.. ", ...%..-,7*.:7:::',‘.: 'irlii,...,Apiiiiie,.-- . 414k, t,,.,,,..;;;;:_,:...;%,.--....-.....,,,,,,,---77*,,..?n,,f-',;::*.-;',...,,..,,,47io:r- --,'-'1,:;,•-.:•... ,,,'X. ,,,.-- s.' ,,... -— •F•3"..lani. ..7. ,... ".. ..-. .:' ,i,e4itri;;,. ..0°",-54,•" 1,'"44:-. "%tr.' - ,j. -ml,,,f,;.,,r_..,i-er,'",,4;14Yfte.,i, '..,.4il:, ..e..:4;..--'•; .-. • •• .... bilt:.:,.• •• , '- . •• . WZ:1741' '!'4, ' .... --=-:,,•-•-•':-1,„;-=•--- "....*-.;' ;•.,;•`"•-` it:e.7.,:.'!'. !!.:.a.,--_-,. ..-4•••••••• ' ',:t .!•••.:'''' ..",,t,'"4"-•• ",,e,'" ,„, -11:.1.;`,•,..-7-. '''' —- --"- '.-'''''''. '*- — ::....,,...: .", .,. al, •...,,:.,,, .,'. ,J0.,•".„....,.,r„,.,.•..,,.,4, -,..•.„.?•...•.e:, :••••••••:„::••••• ..,......—„ 4..„. „ ' g63:. . . . ...t. ....., ft . . wii • . i ...;,:. .,-- ... ..„. ., . • ••••:•,:::::::K::::....::::::... .•...: :„.:::::„... , •. .. • ..,,,,,.. „„„.„........... • ••••••g ' • • ” ..'„?...• .• ' • ••- • ...• ' ..,•-• W.• k . •,••••,...„141 kek,14••• 'Mel .1.44 li:ii:.: •• • :.•• . • i ' ' 4'4+.t1'*.*."*. - ' • . '. ...A•••• • ••. •- ''..e: • • .„ • .• .. .• , ..„„.......:,:•,.... ... - ::,:,•••• :••• :.::- • • .., .........., ....... . . r•-•:;...'h'• ..• ••• : :vi'...i:.:].:'.. . ' . -"::.•:••:i..••• . . .., ...""..•.„.....r. ."•• •-••-•%.. . . .I, . .....,.... .... . •74,• ... •- •...,.,;... , ....,... '•••° •,••••••.''''..%..." - - - k" J47.•••••....• •---- • . ." ••...:••••• . ..:. - . • • - .,•47.:;.'''.: ".f.• .•• .... '• . •• .:::::..:;•:•...:.•:.::::::.•-•••• :•:- • ......,,,4.,,r.,::. •;.;., -...„,.._. .Ni;n,"z71%7,.......,„;!..'...-" .".",....,_:;:,.. ;..,....4.,. :-.,......::::.:.....,..- ..a.. „,.. • .. ':.,.... ":1!-'...-- .4 . .• • :•1§•••• ..'..•••••••• • - -..:... -- - • - .I.,• _,. -:-.T.•••••.-• it13e;;;_:;..."..,..:;:.:....... :•••,••••• -•• ••‘-:::: •• . ..,... ... . , ,.';;I.D.'..-: '"••••••.. • 770,4:4"....,:,.1••••„,... ••••••4 .....• - ' ' ' .!'"' •.....:•.:::::•:-.. -''.....".•••.'4:.. ev,10.5.14:1.-'.: .. 4.::::44.::.'..; .-...-• ....,...:..r.:.::.:.. .......,•T:::'i".41.6";.'::7,:oliii.A7irit:—. *.: ..,- • - -::4:- .t.;..i.4.A4..'.".•''''''''4:':■''''''''''•:'^.•• : ' ..",;;....::...:7; . . ; ... ....... .1 V. . ..-.1±7; '....'"•:.7.2k •-.. ,,,.:,...•;" ' •tr,..••• "', '• --• '. ti.14:.1:tt•!'"'.... .,,.-.7 44,grl'..t:r.''.... .::.::"v. -.': . i....'4.. • " ....., •''. - :Kc::1....":":::r'' • • :.i. ''.. 4Tert Itf i'':.4.,4.4'4,... ..:. , -. ,. - • - . ,.. ,/•; , :.',. ',..• t -. ••"•••;;•,,i'Oil. ,•'''...,,,,' ''t'r' . :1"-,-.' ? '• •..;•••'....-, - • ;.. .44X1•01.0.1:4, ;.":44;:,Iti- ---.,•••••., , i , r',., -4:..-• r".=,• tr,' •'''•ii;i0.-eine::".......::::..i:E:••':" • ' ,• • . '1,i...•••••"..t.;*.;.er-ca61•*:- oji , ': .'"':::ViiiIllarl''-.:-; -'- ' '- CI ''" ..,,, -.0.- ...al"-.n...1. v ..'7 „'`.." .,,t....!.•A:.. • '''^-,:•.....„..., ......'..... .. . •.2!.....4a<P1011.'T: •#....:''':-..i.' s'"'"," ..1: •'..'..2- .•-•:•••,X,..,.f:i, •, . ,,,S-74.,,AV: •!Ai...:t•••••::..1krir.`"rnF*Lv'' ,, i'"..., ii/r:.,1iF..7:i .. ' 'i).. VI - •:, ....:,. .,., .!..:,.Y.•••-ner.........Q•,:.•••;.7 .•-•'--. ....Iv..:,,,.tr...e....-••*••::,,,,;•:•,:' • ,...„..,:' . '• :':::' -N'..\VAir'.",26.,•,-....S.1.. A.t....,,;::,...,: z--- .-',--:,;:A-1:°P;;T-f.:."..-...,..,....„,„oi,.„-- ..,:„.. 'Sp ,.. ..........,,- .::... .‘",.. ei.•,:e,:".w.4.':.•.'.." -•-..2.. '.:.-..g,i1f1(:of.'t,,,-.;,.--- ,...k,'..„.. .... „. ..... .. DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE,: WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 - ,,, - -,,,c-TM LUG- ', 'a 1 Lo.,0 , ..- ..„,..b.,_...... ---__,--- i ,,,.. ii7"- ::,i''' ')5.1k-,:'%-''.. :',,t;',.„,r,,',4",,,,,,f; •,,,...r.„... . ,..,.. .; ,V,--i.',' ''.■..‹.:1■■• ,-.4e,,,-;1•,,,' :: ,z .,,,,A,-,,,"•"'S'.,,,Z.5.4,',.. '4,"01:','•-•'' '...„7.1'Att..;,», pil'-'5'&0.1 • ' '' ' T.O.;.: 'f•,:.:4.A'4V.';',,"-7':: :•'1.,' ' ,t:M*4.9,'"•,:ur-::,--,:•,--.'1,,,,' 3,:,,i,d7,--, g,i'-' .; (',4 g ",;'''%')0'''!.1:-!-,tf,".,;;' ".......! 'IA' .....",;:f.,-,,,,...„.•:„4,-„...,- j • °= ! x ',;.; APPENDIX B p . ____ S -3-,,* REPO t;ii„::-.:. -:,';';.1 nRY RAT-. FORMS y ,„ „,,.. ...... , "°"'01.) 0 AB L.. _ . ., " CUSTODY_ ..,,, CHAIN-kJ „,,„„ II- '•;,/,:k.zi--.7,i,,.,...! !---, '-'-k. uHAI" REPORTS •....„....,....„ -,-..,„•.4,, .„-,,,,,...,„,..,.....„,• , ,,,, ,,,..1.,,,,,,, ' ".".": P1;0'5'17;4' ',..,..,;,-, .,;--",?,,,,......,,,„„r- ",,,,,,,::.----,:•47,' y.',.. A,,,,,, .4,1 ..i,;,:;.;',.„,l ii, ( 0;,,,..:,-- .,.: ,.-..,...i.,,,••=---, - '/',.zE ri!II.,k4,0'-,•'?it.,•-:•:.-,-,'---,--,-.:-,,,,,i.:,...:,.. --...•,. , YI:::::;:,:tii':.:!-!:.-•-%1-:%;-- ''' ,-;..„,,,,,,,,,,........,.. • ,... ,...„...„..-.--,..,......„- • ,...•,...t.„,,,,,,,,:,„....,....;„,,,,,:: ...„,.•-...,,....„...,A.,.. ,:t,-:**,\'s.-••-•,xkliii,,,,,T, ---a"-4-'-''''" :,;,:-..•:r.,.....,:',':.P.i.., ,1',.. —:. , ...-,-.1.1.,!, y.,,,,,...v.,., .-.•••••• ,,,•., - '-'''''' '''':•:',:i;,,':*',•:.::::..''\:■ •;',:::;4' 7Z•V'ag 1 J ■,'..•'D4Y:';'/,'"•5,:',. .-t`, : 't1t1,„ •,...''.7,,''*.';''''''kIN,/,•,,,''''''.‘",';•,-"•.,,,,....' '''';',•Ni., , •''''::''•i:';,i'lf••', ..',,' .,'.1'1'.;',l•', '''''`'•',•' " • ..!"..2,,,,,,X,...:3::jr,.•i•i•''',2**/,-.X.'•^.2...."''''...4i-,' ''',',''',.:',,, ,'''''•,',121/11'4'g',..,*,-:,.;■.1.'si,„,' ';',',,,,,,,, rA,..,,, l''',§V"",ftf4=, --,4,„014:11t-c. •-.'.,:y4;...,-,-:,:-,.....„-,„,-,::,„ ,.•.•,„,-.::t Igi-00,-.-,F-,--,:,-,,-7.4,1:::1.%-4,:,:-:,,.41t.d.,--.r%,-; .,......„.. ,..,..,._ ,, , . . . •;•,,,, ,,,,,,,4,— ,A1,,,-3,,, - ,,, ', — . ,;;!•, ..,.. . '..-,,,, ::.:1:' -.4.,--.,,,,,..,0..•.. •,,...-,,:,,,,-- - 32-3123 .-.,,: .' - ,,,,,,t4...,..,...,,,.,, ,4.t-s•„,.-•,...,... -. ASH I NGTON 206-6 ' ' • ' ''"- • '''',.,''''<.\•— - ''.4' G SEATTLE,,.- ,:•- „. , ',,,..„-- ,,,,„,..A,,,,,,,..,14,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.„„,,,,„. ,.,„„,,, . L W : -..•.-0,1-='="-.. ,.,---, ut,-,-, , ' ,• -, •,-...,-,,„,:,.,,.•,....-;,...,..• **,....A.......,,,,...,,,......,‘,„,„„:„. •,,,,,,,,,..,.. ,... ''','- . .-- - •,,. . ,„„- -,-• •.,11,46,:--,,,,,..-w-M'itt-,- •' -- . . - :",',' ', - - i.V.*.iiii,K, •,.•,7 .,./s':,---,y.-gg-,=.:ff, •k,":-., '- ' ,•..411 ---" f •.:::::::::::::::::::',.„....:::: fli06W047oR,E"a.r :..: ::... .P. , . D. I-.,A:'..,1.1,-....•:.',.8.. •B, .P.,i.,..cL.. lm—C . ,.,....,i.,,.,.„,„a7,,.,.,„_jT,,p,„ 0i z L }ffsviTS " • ......... . ,..,„,... _ ..,.....,..T....„,....,::::::......„.,,, ... $eatt- te 1 fiataP:r47,,7:74.-:.,;4:::„„:.=..„... „ . ''''...--------':', ,t w-t.:*A,,w,,,,,, ,„..,,,awEms.::a.k., •:44:41.4.$4,4 .i...-::,,,:::::::.........1...„ „ . A• '' '''.... : ''''' ,,-::::::4::::.,,,, .."........."" R: i;4.; :::::,:.,,,,,„::::::::. ::.... ::.,:-..-:- e.l.g.°01;/.. ..:Viggligggli .u.:4::::::11.0.k0:1:::::'-:'atA.:114.,.,..*...''F^.. ''...::::::.:::::::::::„-'''''. .. ••••••::::::_::::: ...... ::.'i.....:Ir,'''''':-',4,;,'•.:(7-.1.1i•..,.9."* ;'.'''''Ig'figggiri.7..ri .1111:0161::Ergirilieetika$4',... :::. =-.. ..44..iiihi. ' i 'itr4ylize.""..' ifilitiIrS7,:ltr , :$7.4.....:::;:.::::::::::::::-- ''' '''''''''''''''''''' '' '-''''''''''''''''4'•E'::::;:421gOkalg ..°.'4*‘t\leiggig'?"'E...',.17a•.-:1:::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:::::.„. ... .. . -,•-, ----..--_..„, 5akfakit0,40:!;.t,Z7,- . ...:.:::•:•:........:E....7...::::::::: 2---',112 , 2 A •0002:::::::;:;:;;;;;V:Z:-,'Aik-2i^?:-.Eat;::::::::::::H:E - 4.T‘11/%73 1 r'..itifi jt.....g,,MVidil'"Vgiek:::::::,F.•':" ....::::: 44 _ . ....-.., „............,., 7' 22::20 ...0:44.00104*.att,..,‘:&Tg•Pl.:•::::::::::::::•:;',"::' 09 !.,.:.,....f,--.. .• 4,,,.-4,:;.,..,, :::::::::::::::::::::„:„..,......,,:::::::::::::::::.:.......:........„:„....,...: ,..gfi:::::HEF:„:::::.1•:-:'::::., „:;::::::.''.:.:...:'....iii.::::::. .1;;;:i.i,:1-r W V.1.1.i.:;7.,:,. .Z.g..:::::ffftEE::::::: ' .,.',.:V • : ...•..,..:.,,,,,.,...•::::,........... . .`. -4::::::::::.A.:''.;:.„,,,,,,,w''''..z.Lrxe.,„•,,,E-,.;.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:::„.,................. • ...: ....i........::fl. :::::..q.EHE„T:::.,....E::. zt.'7:ar...E....g:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::1:1::::: • .. , ' ...11*r p, .ect Manager Pel,■';';::?:'n *X:4,prieWItty:'...-r.03....:., Manager '. - .•.„ :f; ' 'l\liti?':'f''''.;"3".77.i"%ii,‘.tifi.. ,:',Itil•,,,.‘'.1 iH '.::...:Cklitrk.:' e'lltal::::0 0,. 10',..41tittg 'k.4.14''Zigi::::::::;4„-...tfitt?Il...., .f.H.:::------.....-4: ■:.'- -• •• ken:::•c. 1..,L'i.'. et I0.4W:lioth..St,:114 .., ......., ::::::::::vz.12.;i77..4.i......:::....::..,...WA 981.17.4449 : ...,...,:q..k. ..1...???....w.;',,,,,,,,,,,!:y, ;....* ...•f............ 4111"111'Xtrw He „. ........ 4....t4.....:...4...:::::::::::e.........,,,,„„. : ,.,. . . . .... . .::. ,:::,....\..........4..„,,,,,,........... ... ''''':":''''''''':'):•''''''' =•::'' iiittiSd'''''''''''''':'-::::':'rAr' .... ..,..thk.....:...reiiiiti.„Iiiiiin:::the testing oftiattaigil..... •...,submitted.on.Jarttiary .1.134,...2.....009,:::::::::::::•±:f:::...,....:.. .::: ..,...............,:-...:•: ..: ...,.....- - .„ ..$. :.;.:,',',.4,;.t.-Vitcittte...:Diseciver-.317.....:-Bay ..F... ........ i::;':::''41L'9:: '''t':'''''-:'::::-. '''---.' ;•••••.: :.&SI 901132 project. There are 4 pages included':in:."this ::::!„::„.,„ tt''.1.1.11..i.gl'al'''::,: 4;.'..7•:',i ': .:::::::Aii3t.H.' ::::ialzt' tt..164. ::::,..tlitt..,....J1,11#y remain are currently scheduled for disposa1.0..::$:.......4.:::.4.,,yo.,;;T:f„:::::::ff::::::: l*.:':i::1::':::Ar...,....',i' -c"..' i.'11-•"'";*1'ow.-d.,:,u- :::1-ificto..- TH::eturn your samples or arrange for long term storage atrotirH:::: ::::::::::..] :„ ::::„„,:,,„,....„.„ ,...'Syjik:.k...t.,.....;: ,::"t".?-."•;!l'iiiifiiiiii'... otitaYct•UiS as soon as possible. ''.:..:'.'...',::::i:lititillf,:;•,:..41i.....„1,i,",t.........„:::...:...!i?„:..".....:.:::::.........f.::-.:.:::E.•.::: ::..- • 4..k,.,N"...,•••,:geilvkl.: 11.12:.,-"--71m:L:LEEE"'..''. ...,....4,4the4s114 I ,4,•4•.• .• . .v:::::,.•:.this......• .opportunity 1"1:4464: 7A' '' : •. tei.'thie to be of service to you and hope you will call if you - :,...,...,'::::„...!1::::21-2111111111• :,.......4,,t‘f.44: 060'.,,,,,,*:::.,::::::::::;::::::::::::::•:::,,,,"""":""...."": stio ,,,,, „ ns. .F..-...:....!:.,.„.........:......................!1Y !4.!It' :"••-::"••••••••••-•::•.""""":::::: EaTffitaiMsXZit*".PLA...". r.,:•::::::::::-.......: .....:4::'114iriggaltaiiiiii:kfiN;',-:-----z''":::::::::EE:::::: :E.- • ...........„,,,. : 1:1 .---''---A4 --C. ,114t)y... . i iN "."..0.===za..2::::::::::::::::::::::E.Esp.:,owifsr,.../ •... .... .._ • .,1::',E.:::::::::.,....,:i.i.:::::::....,..:-..........,...1...i'...............!...1.,....:...1:i.::......::,....::ii.,L,,,iii.:111:':7,,,H;...:!!':a:''':,,::',,t"..i„,.,.:::::fm..::::,,,,Hil:Ii::::":::::::.,,...L::::,:::::::!:: ---...---m=azwariEE.3...i,"?.....°4.e.0,,...0.41.4...:!..sii.c.7„.,. .......,...,............„:„.:,,.„....,, . , .. .: , .iigligiteli,.&;;;;;;;,...ak...F,i..,.....;;IftiOisfifstio.2, ,................................m:E'.., ,,,,,:::....„„.... . . „ „ ...................-- .... ... ..„ ,. ;‘....:554,0.....2Eikag::::::E:::::.01N.0.1.:;:;:::::16gap.„,':.....7.'.F..-.-,...,.:....... ................ .. ............::::::::.,•::::::::::::',:..•:',•:!:.....::!:::,.:.:::,....!..•:::!,..::::11,,...•!:.::::::...5;i.:',11:::!,..11!:1:'1::ii.‘a-'iic,',...,..11...,,,,,mtl,;.''..i',.,„:':,;,,r"...:"7,-...„::::,,,,,k.....:,: tdg4,-",Lr......r,I,,,,,-,„..e..„..z,,,z,,:::::.4F,Fas,..:4.14 f.,..-...:..........6.1,:-:-.,',->,,•;1:vt!,011.;:.....Lt!.. ...:-.:::.-...:::::::::::: ::::. ,,wgig :::t.iiq,.:Ng.::::::::.E.Balz•••••:4244,..t.F?.?.;?,:.A144•4•4•,:.4•NieL.'... ,f,... .., .,... -- -",::: ,..........,.................., -..------,„_„„-„,„.„.. ERE.,1,,,,tE;a•ii...E.E.;•:::•••••••.:•.1::...N.14•,Frad:.;,t,?.....14:1:„.3.:4„:,:.,:„..„„,..„,..,.,.... ••• - •••••••••::::::::::::::::::""""""""":,k+.24,wqmsEE:=-..EEFE::::, !;t..'EiEf4:.,:'•,kEF:EF:;::;::B.:•••;:::;::.:..•:tl......•:.;:i46,'pt'.g4tf:66: ' :•".•••.,••,••''::::::•1-':.:::::::::::::::H: """""""""'"...•'•'::::::::':::.:.:•:2'2,'4:::51EIN41N,..,,N.R.,.,9g ,ifi.....5.2.:::::.:44.4i6B••a•zia;:.t:E..;;;;;;;;;Noi.,tatip.;•,,;,==:;•1•:•••:::...„:„.....„" :":":::::::::::::::::":2g,:gz-ST:.:1•Iffia41W:Wom 136;Fiiii.E.Re..5i5;;;;;.4•4::4::::2;:;;;;;Allgo•4ro:FQ sm,,,,,E,,,,:::„.„ ' . '--•-••••••••••••••••••••••-wz-a,=:::::::::;:::::::::,,R.7.::•g::::::::::. ,.,„.„,......,..„,:,,,,:,,,,,..,, w"""'rw:''''''"'"""="'"''""'•'-',-,-,,,...::=;:,:::= :,:•.j,iiiiili,''''',,,Ikafill4 f.:;•....i."..;:,1;;E:., ...:.........1.1: ,:c,;:.,t.,.40,,,r,,,,,:,c,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.: ............, .-.1. : 1•1:1:1";'"'"":::::'''',,•••••••'i•:',p...VE'a''''',,,,,q4" ,a•Ez.:=2,,,;:::q ..-''"•""""=',"""","",,,,,,,,K,41,m....En.S4•4:-....::::.ft,:ssEErd..,,,,,, z•••••••4••••••::F.2:::::::::::REME:i4t4-74::;:::::::,:::::;,...:;::::::: 34.*Itit,,,.,„,,,.,-„...-_14„4...„•,„:„„........„.„„„.... -1 1.: -.- '"':'"'"'„.,..,,,,„..-„L,"1:44 "t,',„1,1,'In.g.;:ktgag,R..v.,,•2 :i.Pit•Esiht:;:.:.::.;;;;F5'.-.11'..I.i .14?:.44,1t41:2:0:::::"..•—'.1t-::::::: :E:::::::::.H: ::1:1:.... - :::::1: .11.1--•••••••":'":••••:' '•-•,,••••-•,,,,==:,,,,,,,,,,,;::.:,=:.;.,,,,-..g2--,,,,,,::::„,„ 0:$;;;•.p.i.'i:F.•,°:35552".2"...:6:@'•:::::gti:iaN.54:...e..ig.."..?ggiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiir."•,:.,y,,,F.,,,,,:f„................... :.,............ k"..;..,•".,,,--,,,•,,4-...:*..iitimmiefiumoseme.,,,,,,,:.,:r,:.,:.„.5......1.,,..„_,,,,,,,_,„,„,...,v.,...i, miliiiii.....tiERIE12•14•0•0•Atailopiiic.-,,,,,,,„:7;7",......;.„„.... : ."".1""":1.1"""""• -•.'":g:'011LF:"'-';'-"7.--7-'j.,,„,),:',11:iifiRg.::::::::; ,:.,:mig,';41.:0 Ei4Akiti„E,'figgiasEa.ieigNiciitt,,,111471s-,•EttatE.J,..K:K:E.........,::::„:: -.::::":::=.'"""":::::':'"'""".' aM:r.•'•:•:aEgttEtk:Wk:gigaila. sleizzatzu::::::::::::::::::::gassa#4:411:E::::::ffigffix:ig, z.,-.;;;Tv;,'„,,-,.;,,s,!::::;::::::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:::::::.„...:::::::„„•:„„ :::,... ....::::::::::=-.E.14::::::::::mg.zgh*.gga?:42="-aums=s:n•:•:".".:::::-.24,::::::......s....i. 79••'^'4•'''''':"Sq.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::PEN•40.inV8::::::::,:irs,iii:::::::8:,::,:;::,:iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikr1;,:„.„=„„.„.,....:,.............,........,. „........„... ;;;;841141:15.2a4NINAVES4,00/INE...EMAW,:,::::::::::::::•5::::::::::::::::: iiiiROINitatgOEMOvvitor,,,,,4„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:m.:„..„„,„.,,,,,.....................::::...... '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"''''-'2''''''''''''"""--"7":7"7"..'''''''';':::,..,:,:•,:v=11::::i:':,f::::-":::::::::i.:',:::','„,:i::,,,,:•; -------&4:::::::::::::::"=::EsmaR$2000.4:06•2:00„',:‘ • -m,4t,"....::::.:::::::::::::::::•Q„:::::::::„: ..... .......,.......,,,,,,,i.v::::::::::::::::::::::::::44444444444::::::,..tuts6A604. ,..,,,•,. ,...................„... . :::::t.::::::::12.4....,,,,,,,,,,,,,::::,„:11.:44.......:444444...,4;a•.......*:::::$:::::::...P.,..,..4......, '''..'... """v".v..........'''..., „..=•..T.,,,,P,,,,,,0E,i.,-..-.,„-„,-..,-.2-...,..,-,[„:„„,,,,,,,„:„...„ ... :„„.... • .... ' . ••••• -,.......„„.„...................,••• .„,..„.. „,....,„..,........ , - - . ''''.....•....'...:.:.:,,,..,,,,,,,,,,.,..,,,,,..„r„..„,., ' '........ .'• •............,,.....,....... ..............„.........,,, .„„„„.„.,....,....,......„ ......., „..,.. .................. ,.,....„„„,„„„,. „„,,,,.........,„ ....„ ...., FRIEDMAN & BRITYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on January 16, 2009 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the DLH Envirorimental Consulting Discovery Bay, P&BI 901132 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below. Laboratory ID DLH Environmental Consulting 901132,01 11609-1 LUG FEN! 901132-02 11609-2 901132-03 11609-3 901132-04 11609.4 901132-05 11609-5 901132-06 11609-6 901132-07 1.1609-7 901132-08 11609-8 901132-09 11609-9 90113240 11609-10 All quality control requirements were acceptable. 1 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS LUG iTAVI Date of Report: 01/22/09 Date Received: 01/16/09 Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 Date Extracted: 01/19/09 Date Analyzed: 01/19/09, 01/20/09, and 01/21/09 RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL AND MOTOR OIL USING METHOD NWTPI-Dx Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm) Surrogate Sample ID Diesel Range Motor Oil Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Cio-C25) (C25-C36) (Limit 50-150) 11609-1 <50 <250 82 901132-01 11609-2 150 x 960 83 901132-02 11609-3 4,200 x 14,000 85 901132-03 11609-4 d 48,000 x 380,000 64 901132-04 Imo 11609-5 <50 <250 83 901132-1 11609-6 59 x <250 77 901132-06 11609-7 3,000 x 5,200 $8 901132-07 11609-8 <50 <250 76 901132-08 11609-9 <50 <250 78 901 132-09 11609-10 740 x. 2,300 78 901132-10 Method Blank <50 <250 87 2 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. LOG ITEM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS ` ` . . of lr Date of Report: 01/22/09 Date Received: 01/16/09 Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES LES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL EXTENDED USING METHOD NWTPH-Dx Laboratory Code: 901132-05 (Matrix.Spike) Sample Percent Percent Reporting Spike Result Recovery Recovery Acceptance RPD Analyte Units Level (Wet wt) MS MSD Criteria (Wait t 20) Diesel Extended mg/kg(ppm) 5,000 <50 114 123 63-146 8 Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Percent Reporting Spike Recovery Acceptance Analyte. Units Level LCS Criteria Diesel Extended mg/kg.,(ppm) 5,000 112 79-144 3 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. LUG ITEM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS = .dam A.,E3 Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a.level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide relable.inforination on the variability of the analysis. A l -More<th.an one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probablility. b - Theanalyte was spiked at a level that was less thanfive times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful. ca-The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate. c-The presenee of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections. d-The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution. ds-The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful. dv-Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly. fb -The analyte indicated was found in the method blank. The result should be considered an estimate. fc-The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant. hr-The sample and duplicate*ere reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity. ht-The sample was extracted outside of holding time. Results should be considered estimates. ip -Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the - quantitation of the analyte. j—The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate. The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits: The reported concentration is an estimate. jl - The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. jr - The rpd."result in laboratory control sample,associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. s - The surogete associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. lc- The preseA4e of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination. L- The reported.concentration was generated from a library search, nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the. RPD is not applicable pc—The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate. pr-The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate. ve -The value reported exceeded the calibration range established for the analyte. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte. x -The pattern of peaks present is not indicative ofdiesel. y - The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of motor oil. 4 c . -.,% ,, • sQ W . E .4,%„ii --,-', 7 .(:`?:,4 r, i z . v .tea / es•, ...r- ., gi ?V "' ti v 4 s At7HCt szi Ons °s7qo (t.' 1 , Z 4 4 ftt7.()t�gX .1H)-- 'II O w s- V \ a) a 3 , - .8 . > , :.-- ' a x o co �- 0 u p ., P 0, pi vfto, ‘.' 4 ..1„ -0t + . ' .,:(0-4 ,,, ,,,,,,1:,,,,... ,:„.$ :.4.0...,,.,, 44 0.4 �� s } t itii , ‘ *'''' t3' - 1 't ip., ,t) ...., ... , C:3 ir ,,,, j;:,, 1 ' ''Fi 4% * .Olifi 1 (0, ,,,j\\\ z,,,, I 44 MI / -''"(:-"---.22..Of I L - B DISCOVERY SOIL CEANUP BAY RESTORATION REPORT PROJEUILDING 1 CT 28023 HIGHWAY 101 IDISCOVERY BAY,WASHINGTON I SUBMITTED TO: I NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION (NOSC) 205-B WEST PATISON STREET I PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 I I PREPARED BY: I DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 2400 NW 80th Street PMB #114 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98117 SUBM T ► 3 1 EWITT I November 3, 2009 1 I I DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS I1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LuV ITEriA 1 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK af 1 o • 3.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 1 ' 3.1 Hydrocarbon Testing 1 3.2 Soil Removal Activities 1 4.0 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (WDOE) REQUIREMENTS 2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 2 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 2 7.0 LIMITATIONS 3 ITABLE A - CONFIRMATIONAL SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS 2 • APPENDICES APPENDIX A -Site Sketch, Site Photographs IAPPENDIX B Laboratory Reports, Chain of Custody Forms, Confirmational Soil Samples IAPPENDIX C - Initial Soil Sample Laboratory Data for Characterization and Waste Manifest. APPENDIX D Soil and Wood Debris Disposal Data I DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 Discovery Bay-Building 1 Restoration Project November 3, 2009 North Olympic Salmon Coalition Page 1 of 3 LUG hhEM RI of 1 ' 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Soil sampling and analysis conducted in January 2009 at the area identified as Building ' 1 Foundation confirmed soil in this area to be impacted with motor oil and diesel (Soil Characterization Report, DLH Environmental Consulting, January 16, 2009). Based on I the confirmation of impacted soil (Appendix C), DLH Environmental Consulting (DLH) and Pacific Environmental Services Company (PESCO) were retained in September 2009 to remove the impacted soil (along with concrete and wood debris) and restore the impacted area after the soil was removed. Refer to Appendix A for a site sketch and Iphotographs. ' 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK Impacted soil was removed from the area by PESCO of Port Townsend, Washington. ' The soil was excavated using a backhoe then placed in dump trucks prior to disposal. DLH collected confirmational soil samples from the excavation pit after the impacted soil was excavated and placed in the trucks. These samples were collected and Ianalyzed to confirm that all impacted soil was removed. 3.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 3.1 Hydrocarbon Testing IThe confirmational soil samples collected from the excavated area were analyzed for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) content using Method NWTPH-Dx. The Iresults of laboratory analysis are presented in Table A. The soil samples (6 total) were placed in sterilized glassware furnished by the project laboratory. In an effort to minimize the possible loss of any volatile hydrocarbons that may have been present in the soil, the samples were stored in an iced chest until delivered to the laboratory. All EPA-established sample-handling protocols, including chain of custody procedures, were observed during the course of the project. Laboratory results and chain of custody Iforms are located in Appendix B. 3.2 Soil Removal Activities ' Approximately 244.46 tons of impacted soil were removed from the spill area and disposed of at the Olympic View Transfer Facility in Bremerton, Washington. Disposal I data is located in Appendix D. A large amount of wood debris was also encountered during soil removal activities. This material was also disposed of at the Olympic View Transfer Facility (see disposal manifest in Appendix D). ' According to Mr. Sather of PESCO, the concrete debris (former building foundation) also removed from the site was disposed of at Port Orchard Sand and Gravel DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 ' Discovery Bay- Building 1 Restoration Project November 3, 2009 North Olympic Salmon Coalition Page 2 of 3 LUG frEM TABLE A ... �f Confirmation Soil Sample Analytical Results SAMPLE# SAMPLE LOCATION ANALYSIS RESULTS (see photographs) (in PPM) 9109-W West sidewall of excavation NWTPH-Dx None Detected • 9109-N North sidewall of excavation NWTPH-Dx None Detected I 9109-E East sidewall of excavation NWTPH-Dx None Detected I 9109-B Bottom of excavation at lowest NWTPH-Dx None Detected point, approximately at center of excavation 9109-S South sidewall of excavation NWTPH-Dx None Detected 9109-Sidewall North sidewall of excavation along NWTPH-Dx None Detected North berm NWTPH = Washington Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Dx = Hydrocarbon identification for diesel and motor oil range C10-C36 I PPM = Parts per million None Detected = <50 ppm(diesel range),<250 ppm(motor oil range) 4.0 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (WDOE) REQUIREMENTS A copy of this report (and the original Soil Characterization Report) was forwarded to the SW Regional Office of the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). I 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Analysis of the confirmational samples collected from the impacted area confirmed that the impacted soils have been removed and properly disposed of In addition, the shoreline was restored by backfilling the excavation with imported clean gravel, sand, Iand rock. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Since all of the impacted soil was removed, no additional recommendations are made at this time 7.0 LIMITATIONS IThis report has been prepared for specific application�tothis project in amanner D L.i"en osnm�en ar sc�ein�Ce1 prZS o u'Frey � �Y i #32-3123 y ticni ' area. Discovery Bay- Building 1 Restoration Project November 3, 2009 North Olympic Salmon Coalition Page 3 of 3 Recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based on laboratory ' analysis of soil samples collected on September 1, 2009. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. DLH Environmental Consulting shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were withheld, concealed, or not fully disclosed at the time this evaluation was performed. DLH Environmental Consulting has no control over the accuracy of information provided by outside consultants, contractors, and agencies and, therefore, disclaims responsibility ' for any inaccuracies incurred. Also, DLH Environmental Consulting accepts no responsibility for verifying compliance with government regulations for hazardous material and waste use or storage at the subject facility. ' The underlying philosophy h in formulating the conclusions and recommendations was to Y 9p p Y formulating reduce uncertainties regarding the property and pertaining to environmental hazards, to ' the degree possible. Therefore, the results of this assessment should be viewed as reasonably accurate estimates, given the project limitations of the existing environmental condition of the property. This report is for the exclusive use of North Olympic Salmon Coalition, the WDOE, and their representatives. If new information becomes available as a result of future site • work,which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., DLH Environmental Consulting reserves the right to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. • DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 LOG ITE 1 1 1 APPENDIX A 1 SITE SKETCH 1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 LUGi =otr :: "0'V 0 Of j PAO / 1 ° o I 1 U 1 m OJ H } J N La ' m 11 5 \\ O Q::'ss'■,1/4 ce>jj 1 Z \ J I O w \\ O O I \ \ \ IS I 1 U ' 1 I 1 W / Z Ct 1 J w , > / I Z m 0 J 1 / Z / h I .2 )ti O O I ea W CC \ a, I T o T 11 o i I_ 1 1 I 1 I / \ "--€00—_----- I m • I \ } \ o I > t \\ o V 1 I le 1 / o U\ i o \ 1 Z ,.g■ o \ 1 ° c I 1 a N ^\ 1 0 E I I W I I rr L_ I Q W m ' Q c U r W vi ix W O °8 = ~ CN J 0 IZo CI z I - 4.„"dile, ,.,. —■ 4 . , •• . . _ • , . , . . . , . I : ..., 70 ...... ..„ ... • . . , ,.• , , .. ..,_ , ., P.1) H, .. 4 I . I _ . . I '-' . • - Excavation of 0. , soil I .. notice lare 9 , wop m d timbers all re oved ,-, I - and ditposed of .4,77 .' .... , • 0 --- ---- arQ-5-,g,o-,--r,.-',s-,,•,-:..:7.-_t's;,o,„,,a.„•,.„,, . . , ,.. , ....-,-,:t.,,,-.. .- :-.,,,,,,,...,......z.,,,,,,,,_,-,,,,,,T,:,.i,...--,i,T4r. it,Ak.:' ..,,;,.. f r-......e,....-;...t,-,-...:Att , • • k, ' "i9,-„,,4-7:7- 'fix":-.r.,:.--. ) - -,7'.--,-;=,-,..-. 4.---.-.: - - - . - -.--,.ks.:;. .--''. '-•.,,,•‘.'..re,--. . "'.,-1, ,,* ' . . •- * - • - -. .:ett;i, ' -4.-'..- - -4 .,-•:' '''', ' ' ' ' ". ''' „ ' ■■■g* „I., . , *!..54034- ., -, ,.. ',• i . . , " I , , I - . ' 1 . , . , • , .., • 1 ' ,. • - : grey clay at depth, note glk•avelti- trove at • shoreline — ., . ___ - -- , I - , - facing north I .., DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 I i t, I ,.. - for., i, ik t I I Ibackillirig excaria ,....__, - ---Riiint.:, ::: L-i-Isi: pIJ -6- -.....,„:„...., ..„.0.,,,,. _ a ........1,,,,s, . ._,,,,,,i ,,,in- M e 13 i ,,,--:,,,-.7"1"11; - -- -,-.... ,.... - - 1 .^ x i 4 . - .. IT E placement of imported clean sort a a — ,. for site�restoration p, . DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 1 206-632-3123 MOW IA I' `f I ---q"2-- ' 7, , t. r 4 I '" • 1 � removal of additional buried wood debris ,,,J* \� a a� a -ti a 4 ",.>,/St . 'n. r.,4,i"' i"t fir, r 4 4 iMAlk, w, I VII . placement of clean imported soil along northern berm imported gravel placed at shoreline .o (facing southwest) DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 I • I 1 I4",„,•%''*;.,•';‘,„1.-iiii.0.4i44.40,.P4',,,- s -`"" '-' ' I . , , - .... ...' ', it.‘--' '...- ' .. : •.:*,', .---...:1,„. .:.;., .i.'"-: I ._. ' - ' 0 \., • placemen t of gravel along shoreline I I . ' I .. I i ___,. I i I ' ':-;-"le-,-.--,- ,-'4-*,'.;,1'Atlif- ...-:.'v-,..,- '',=-«,,,,,A4kip. ,,..,t.-.......'--”,- .., .• *.„. ..„.;i. .,7:,:-. .- - -: - : _ '''''-.;4:1;,--,;,-,-0;:44' .":4.->',:::' ..,..-4.-1040;„;,,,,,r....,..„,'5:-# ,-,t ,...,,,,,.1...r..-;-•.,..- . I ,,,,-- 1.1,;-;kr''"'le"'.- ;".4"''",-'•r; --rt% I . , , .:-- A. . . . . - „ • tirt tw . ., ,,. ,-.. . tor. . ,.. . .. , , .. • . , • .. .. , h line ore , ... , ,.. . - e . _ „ri . ., i . . final s . . . • , . . , I I a DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 206-632'3 0 r r� 4 r r r APPENDIX B I CONFIRMATIONAL SOIL SAMPLES r LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS r 1 r r r 1 r r r DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 r I FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. IENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS James E.Bruya,Ph.D. 3012 16th Avenue West I Charlene Morrow,M.S. �p "� Seattle,WA 98119-2029 Yelena Aravkina,M.S. a'�"` � '�'�d TEL:(206)285-8282 Bradley T.Benson,B.S. FAX:(206)283-5044 Kurt Johnson,B.S. M0f e-mail:fbi @isomedia.com a I September 4, 2009 I IDonna Hewitt, Project Manager DLH Environmental Consulting I 2400 NW 80th St., 114 Seattle, WA 98117-4449 IIDear Ms. Hewitt: Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on September 1, 2009 from the Discovery Bay, F&BI 909014 project. There are 4 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our Ioffices, please contact us as soon as possible. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you have Iany questions. ISincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. I , '-' --ti I Michael Erdahl Project Manager 1 Enclosures DLH0904R.DOC I I I FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS CASE NARRATIVE This case narrative encompasses samples received on September 1, 2009 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the DLH Environmental Consulting Discovery Bay, F&BI 909014 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below. Laboratory ID DLH Environmental Consulting 909014-01 9109-W 909014-02 9109-N « - o v �,, 909014-03 9109-E . ' , 909014-04 9109-B �xd � A 909014-05 9109-S 909014-06 9109-SidewallN All quality control requirements were acceptable. 1 1 I I r r I I I I I1 1 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. IENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS Date of Report: 09/04/09 4 _ � Date Received: 09/01/09 Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 909014 ." � I Date Extracted: 09/02/09 Date Analyzed: 09/02/09 I RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS DIESEL AND MOTOR OIL I USING METHOD NWTPH-Dx Sample Extracts Passed Through a Silica Gel Column Prior to Analysis IResults Reported on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm) IIISurrogate Sample ID Diesel Range Motor Oil Range (% Recovery) Laboratory ID (Cio-C25) (C25-C36) (Limit 67-127) 9109-W <50 <250 97 ' 909014-01 9109-N <50 <250 101 909014-02 I9109-E <50 <250 94 909014-03 I9109-B <50 <250 94 909014-04 I 9109-S <50 <250 97 909014-05 9109-SidewallN <50 <250 99 909014-06 IMethod Blank <50 <250 89 I I I 1 2 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. IENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS1 Date of Report: 09/04/09 Date Received: 09/01/09 %° Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 909014 I QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS IDIESEL EXTENDED USING METHOD NWTPH-Dx Laboratory Code: 909016-05 (Matrix Spike) Silica Gel I (Wet wt) Percent Percent Reporting Spike Sample Recovery Recovery Acceptance RPD Analyte Units Level Result MS MSD Criteria (Limit 20) IDiesel Extended mg/kg(ppm) 5,000 <50 101 109 78-126 8 Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Silica Gel Percent I Reporting Spike Recovery Acceptance Analyte Units Level LCS Criteria Diesel Extended mg/kg(ppm) 5,000 112 70-127 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS Data Qualifiers & Definitions a- The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis. Al—More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability. b -The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful. ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate. c- The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections. d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution. ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful. dv- Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly. fb -The analyte indicated was found in the method blank. The result should be considered an estimate. fc—The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant. hr-The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity. ht- The sample was extracted outside of holding time. Results should be considered estimates. ' ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the quantitation of the analyte. j—The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate. J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate. jl-The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported. concentration should be considered an estimate. jr-The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. as - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. lc-The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination. L-The reported concentration was generated from a library search. nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable. pc—The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate. pr—The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate. ve -The value reported exceeded the calibration range established for the analyte. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. vo- The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte. x -The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel. y -The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of motor oil. ' 4 1 1 � 03 am m . m Wm 7,..„5 -,4" , A p.. P. c' ; .2-' A ry '75:L1 ;.2 )6e ril 'Ni rA III. PA g ' 0 t v) U t . . P, S.H v - Q ,° / • '-- OGti8 Act goons Q,!,'. ,J� '" 0928 Act goon Po Il co v' giti08 Act X[JJB 11111111 . ...1' (: \ c5 '..i U au iossJ'Hds 1111 \ • cn 0.) `Togam-Hin 0 1 E "- ' v It 44 W i CD Cip ate . x \LI 4;111 a\ \L■ Il - . ......... 0 I mg a 0- \� - A - ii• o iNT) I 4 ? -, N Ez L t .5' I . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LUG f APPENDIX C 1 INITIAL SOIL SAMPLE LABORATORY DATA FOR CHARACTERIZATION AND WASTE MANIFEST FOR SOIL DISPOSAL 1 1 DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 1 1 t Generator's Nonhazardous Waste Profile Sheet Requested Disposal Facility Olympic View Profile Number IWASTE MANAGEMENT ❑ Renewal for Profile Number Waste Approval Expiration Date A.Waste Generator Facility Information(must reflect location of waste generation/origin) 1. Generator Name: North Olympic Salmon Coaltion(NOSC) 2. Site Address: Discovery Bay 7. Email Address: restoration @nosc.org 3. City/ZIP: Discovery Bay 8. Phone: 360-379-8051 9. FAX: - r I 4. State: Washinton 10. NAICS Code: /. tasmit 5. County: Jefferson 11. Generator USEPA ID #: �,..r 6. Contact Name/Title: Owen French 12. State ID# (if applicable): A® vR , w IS.Customer Information CI same as above P. 0. Number: 1. Customer Name: Owen French 6. Phone: 3603854221 FAX: 360-385-9395 I2. Billing Address: 205 B West Patison St 7. Transporter Name: PESCO 3. City, State and ZIP: Hadlock,WA 98339 8. Transporter ID# (if appl.): 4. Contact Name: Owen French 9. Transporter Address: P/O.2049 II 5. Contact Email: restorationa�nosc.orq 10. City, State and ZIP: Port Townsend,Wa 98368 C.Waste Stream Information 1. DESCRIPTION a. Common Waste Name: hydrocarbon impacted soil from heavy oil State Waste Code(s): Ib. Describe Process Generating Waste or Source of Contamination: oil from machinery inside of old building, spilled on soil I c. Typical Color(s): gray I d. Strong Odor? LI Yes C1' No Describe: e. Physical State at 70°F: d Solid LI Liquid ❑ Powder LI Semi-Solid or Sludge LI Other: f. Layers? LI Single Layer ❑ Multi- layer 1 NA g. Water Reactive? LI Yes d No If Yes, Describe: h. Free Liquid Range (%): to d NA(solid) i. pH Range: LI <2 LI 2.1-12.4 LI >12.5 d NA(solid) ❑Actual: j. Liquid Flash Point: ❑ < 140°F ❑ > 140°F c' NA(solid) ❑ Actual: k. Flammable Solid: ❑ Yes 1 No I L. Physical Constituents: List all constituents of waste stream - (e.g. Soil 0-80%, Wood 0-20%): ❑ (See Attached) Constituents(Total Composition Masi be>100%) Lower Range Unit of Measure Upper Range Unit of Measure 1. Soil 99% 2. wood 1% I 34: 5. I 6. 2. ESTIMATED QUANTITY OF WASTE AND SHIPPING INFORMATION a. Event LI Base/Ongoing (Check One) b. Estimated Annual Quantity: 350 6 Tons LI Cubic Yards LI Drums LI Gallons LI Other (specify): c. Shipping Frequency: Units per LI Month LI Quarter LI Year One Time LI Other d. Is this a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Hazardous Material? (If yes, answer e.) ❑ Yes No e. USDOT Shipping Description (if applicable): SAFETY REQUIREMENTS (Handling, PPE, etc.): J I02007 Waste Management,Inc. Page 1 of 2 May 2007 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VIVAGenerator's Nonhazardous Waste Profile Slit WASTE MANAGEMENT ;p rD.Regulatory Status(Please check appropriate responses) �`"4 .tL 1. Is this a USEPA(40 CFR Part 261)/State hazardous waste?If yes, contact your sales representative. ❑ Yes 6 No I 2. Is this waste included in one or more of categories below(Check all that apply)?If yes, attach supporting documentation. ❑ Yes ❑✓No ❑ Delisted Hazardous Waste ❑ Excluded Wastes Under 40 CFR 261.4 ❑ Treated Hazardous Waste Debris ❑ Treated Characteristic Hazardous Waste 3. Is the waste from a Federal(40 CFR 300, Appendix B) or state mandated clean-up?If yes,see instructions. ❑ Yes 6 No 4. Does the waste represented by this waste profile sheet contain radioactive material? ❑ Yes g No a.If yes,is disposal regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is disposal regulated by a State Agency for radioactive waste/NORM? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Does the waste represented by this waste profile sheet contain concentrations of regulated Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)? ❑ Yes 6 No a.If yes,is disposal regulated under TSCA? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Does the waste contain untreated, regulated, medical or infectious waste? ❑ Yes 6 No I7. Does the waste contain asbestos? ❑ Yes CJ✓ No If Yes,❑ Friable ❑ Non Friable 8. Is this profile for remediation waste from a facility that is a major source of Hazardous Air Pollutants (Site Remediation NESHAP, 40 CFR 63 subpart GGGGG)? ❑ Yes No IIf yes, does the waste contain <500 ppmw VOHAPs at the point of determination? 0 Yes ❑ No E.Generator Certification(Please read and certify by signature below) IBy signing this Generator's Waste Profile Sheet, I hereby certify that all: 1. Information submitted in this profile and all attached documents contain true and accurate descriptions of the waste material; 2. Relevant information within the possession of the Generator regarding known or suspected hazards pertaining to this waste has been disclosed to WM/the Contractor; 3. Analytical data attached pertaining to the profiled waste was derived from testing a representative sample in accordance with 40 CFR 261.20(c)or equivalent rules;and I 4. Changes that occur in the character of the waste(i.e. changes in the process or new analytical)will be identified by the Generator and disclosed to WM (and the Contractor if applicable) prior to providing the waste to WM (and the Contractor if applicable). 5. Check all that apply: I 6 Attached analytical pertains to the waste.Identify laboratory&sample ID#'s and parameters tested: all samples. (supplied electronically) #Pages: ❑ Only the analyses identified on the attachment pertain to the waste (identify by laboratory&sample ID#'s and parameters tested). I Attachment#: ❑ Additional information necessary to characterize the profiled waste has been attached (other than analytical). Indicate the number of attached pages: I lli I am an agent signing on behalf of the Generator,and the delegation of authority to me from the Generator for this signature is available upon request. ❑ By Generator process knowledge,the following waste is not a listed waste and is below all TCLP regulatory limits. ICertification Signature: Title: Environmental Consultant Company Name: DLH Environmental Consulting Name (Print): Donna Hewitt Date: 3/17/09 FOR WM USE ONLY Management Method: ❑Landfill ❑ Bioremediation Approval Decision: ❑Approved ❑Not Approved I ❑Non-hazardous solidification ❑Other: Waste Approval Expiration Date: Management Facility Precautions, Special Handling Procedures or Limitation ❑Shall not contain free liquid 1 on approval:_ ❑Shipment must be scheduled into disposal facility ❑Approval Number must accompany each shipment ❑Waste Manifest must accompany Load IWM Authorization Name/Title: Date: \State Authorization (if Required): Date: / Ia 2007 Waste Management,Inc. Page 2 of 2 May 2007 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS James E.Bruya,Ph.D. " 3012 16th Avenue West ' Charlene Morrow,M.S. a Seattle,WA 98119-2029 Yelena Aravkina,M.S. i TEL: (206)285-8282 Bradley T.Benson,B.S. FAX: (206)283-5044 Kurt Johnson,B.S. e-mail: fbi @isomedia.com March 17, 2009 ' Donna Hewitt, Project Manager DLH Environmental Consulting ' 2400 NW 80th St., 114 Seattle, WA 98117-4449 Dear Ms. Hewitt: Included are the additional results from the testing of material submitted on January 16, 2009 from the Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 project. There are 7 pages included in this report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you should have any questions. ' Sincerely, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ' Michael Erdahl Project Manager 1 Enclosures DLH0317R.DOC i 1 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS CASE NARRATIVE 1 This case narrative encompasses samples received on January 16, 2009 by Friedman & Bruya, Inc. from the DLH Environmental Consulting Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below. Laboratory ID DLH Environmental Consulting 1 901132-01 11609-1 901132-02 11609-2 901132-03 11609-3 4°9y 901132-04 11609-4 - 901132-05 11609-5 _t�." �_ 901132-06 11609-6 1 901132-07 11609-7 901132-08 11609-8 901132-09 11609-9 901132-10 11609-10 1 All quality control requirements were acceptable. i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. 1 r -k _., Jai Isr ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS ,�,. `SII Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 200.8 IClient ID: 11609-3 Client: DLH Environmental Consulting Date Received: 01/16/09 Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 I Date Extracted: 03/13/09 Lab ID: 901132 03 Date Analyzed: 03/16/09 Data File: 901132-03.010 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS1 Units: mg/kg(ppm) Operator: hr ILower Upper Internal Standard: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: Germanium 108 60 125 I Indium 99 60 125 Holmium 102 60 125 I Concentration mg/kg (ppm) I Chromium 6.39 Arsenic 1.29 Selenium <1 Silver <1 I Cadmium <1 Barium 24.8 Lead 2.46 I I I I I I I I I I2 I FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. t A `Am - ,. IENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS 1' ,P-> Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 200.8 IClient ID: Method Blank Client: DLH Environmental Consulting Date Received: Not Applicable Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 Date Extracted: 03/13/09 Lab ID: I9-106 mb Date Analyzed: 03/16/09 Data File: 19-106 mb.008 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS1 Units: mg/kg(ppm) Operator: hr ILower Upper Internal Standard: % Recovery: Limit: Limit: Germanium 100 60 125 I Indium 96 60 125 Holmium 98 60 125 I Analyte: Concentration mg/kg (ppm) I Chromium <1 Arsenic <1 Selenium <1 Silver <1 I Cadmium <1 Barium <1 Lead <1 I I I I I I I I I 3 ' FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS Date of Report: 03/17/09 Date Received: 01/16/09 /� rk Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 (O c Date Extracted: 03/13/09 /��- - °-J :.� Date Analyzed: 03/13/09 ✓ ' RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL MERCURY USING A METHOD 1631E ' Results Reported EP on a Dry Weight Basis Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm) ' Sample ID Total Mercury Laboratory ID 11609-3 <0.2 901132-03 Method Blank <0.2 1 1 I 4 1 FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. I ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS c ilh Date of Report: 03/17/09 — _6,:d-- IDate Received: 01/16/09 Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 -/ — � I QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES IFOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 200.8 Laboratory Code: 903097-02 (Duplicate) Relative Sample Duplicate Percent Acceptance Analyte Reporting Units Result Result Difference Criteria Chromium mg/kg(ppm) 10.3 11.8 14 0-20 Arsenic mg/kg (ppm) 1.20 1.21 1 0-20 Selenium mg/kg(ppm) <1 <1 nm 0-20 Silver mg/kg (ppm) <1 <1 nm 0-20 I Cadmium mg/kg (ppm) <1 <1 nm 0-20 Barium mg/kg (ppm) 25.6 26.0 2 0 20 Lead mg/kg (ppm) 2.01 1.96 3 0-20 Laboratory Code: 903097-02 (Matrix Spike) Percent I Spike Sample Recovery Acceptance Analyte Reporting Units Level Result MS Criteria Chromium mg/kg (ppm) 50 10.3 90 b 50-150 Arsenic mg/kg(ppm) 10 1.20 103 50-150 Selenium mg/kg (ppm) 5 <1 96 50-150 Silver mg/kg(ppm) 10 <1 103 50-150 I Cadmium mg/kg(ppm) 5 <1 104 50-150 Barium mg/kg (ppm) 50 25.6 95 b 50-150 Lead mg/kg (ppm) 50 2.01 100 50-150 ILaboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Percent I Spike Recovery Acceptance Analyte Reporting Units Level LCS Criteria Chromium mg/kg (ppm) 50 100 70-130 I Arsenic mg/kg(ppm) 10 106 70-130 Selenium mg/kg(ppm) 5 104 70-130 Silver mg/kg (ppm) 10 104 70-130 I Cadmium mg/kg (ppm) 5 103 70-130 Barium mg/kg(ppm) 50 98 70-130 Lead mg/kg(ppm) 50 101 70-130 I I 1 5 I FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. IENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS ,. ‘41 c., j 1 w Date of Report: 03/17/09 Date Received: 01/16/09 Project: Discovery Bay, F&BI 901132 IQUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES FOR 1 TOTAL MERCURY USING EPA METHOD 1631E I Laboratory Code: 903097-02 (Matrix Spike) Percent Percent Reporting Spike Sample Recovery Recovery Acceptance RPD Analyte Units Level Result MS MSD Criteria (Limit 20) 1 Mercury mg/kg(ppm) 0.125 <0.2 104 98 50-150 6 I Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample Percent Reporting Spike Recovery Acceptance I Analyte Units Level LCS Criteria Mercury mg/kg (ppm) 0.125 98 70-130 I 1 I I I I I I I I . 6 MOW .des h".'`... ; , FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS *' ( Data Qualifiers & Definitions a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis. Al—More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probability. I b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix spike recoveries may not be meaningful. I ca- The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an estimate. c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections. I d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution. ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may not be meaningful. I dv - Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised accordingly. fb -The analyte indicated was found in the method blank. The result should be considered an estimate. IIIfc—The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant. hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control I limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity. ht- The sample was extracted outside of holding time. Results should be considered estimates. ip - Recovery fell outside of normal control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the Iquantitation of the analyte. j —The result is below normal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate. IJ - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimate. jl- The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of control limits. The reported I concentration should be considered an estimate. jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. I is - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. lc- The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination. L- The reported concentration was generated from a library search. nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the RPD is not applicable. pc—The sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be considered an estimate. pr—The sample was received with incorrect preservation. The value reported should be considered an estimate. ve - The value reported exceeded the calibration range established for the analyte. The reported concentration should be considered an estimate. IIvo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte. x - The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel. Iy - The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of motor oil. 1 7. • ...e.t a Q ... II\ g h q . . = 2 a S * P `` •' lil % v g 3 '0 c' L 3, A. t Q Q I %1 i rillt,g ti .68 :4.0 0 ‘.. p......_ ,.. fp t_i _......,. 4411 cl....... .... i x .3 * z .v. •.mimmemen• i jli PT, el co u ?4 1111111111•1041 *iliPMEHMINI /l I 1 ,. 111111111EMEalrala ;.. : r B YZI" 00 ° 13 Ilsail • 0/.38 Al"JOAS ■ k - t 0938 A 800A il I 708 Aq X:411:1 I A " 1.°14"Enicil it 11 >- ! 0 tik k5a 4: Z 44 Itt 41.) TOSORT-FICTI ciumemEsEpourii z . I. it - . --- II -75111 ci 1 0 . - E 4.,. as 4, cn ii ji I n co I EL' — IN1 (.4■ .) .St. 14- .0 I. I I tx,, \I-- (0 9. . 4. 411/ (- C) 40 'Z.) C;; 4 .,C$ '"Q -.... ..x2.0* 1 a I 0 , '..c_1... 3 111 0 R . — c N $3, Ci 7.41 CM i ) i / i _ I / / I 1 II it .... CO 4.0.■ rt: c92.7 0, k, - , ;Iv; ;1 ' Ogtcr..."Z I i APPENDIX D I SOIL, WOOD DEBRIS AND CONCRETE DISPOSAL DATA DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206-632-3123 I 70L LJ+4e,i'l'tZt A414 P 4 I si- r= • 1 CUST(YMER INV(ACT SUNIMARN" Int o:co It o; ott ts;•20(0 1;',01:tatUow; ;tom 09 01'it.0091,,o6:14 ,t009 t1.00054q Na;t0: PACIFIC VNVIR(YNAWNTAI, t;.; 0:Att N1,..;0Httm tttxt:t I 10 Hoc. Nutttilt.6 N.tnn'oot: I I0:.;3022 139_6 ; :Nt06 S• ;006 tn 4 9 ; ;:tooy 9 2069 2861 1,482.57 67.3Q24 Dw.o IS.9S (.:t:19.25 .19.4 9 I 2009 6 S.2,A9 613026 13,•)49. 01.76 1 l';051 2060 9 20t19 Prof0.4.-T.,11. profile oads: $ 2.4,4,-4ft :t.S 12,614,16 ICustomer !owl t„ostonter Loads: 24-1.46 ts 12,614.16 002:0 ;it-A:::6,Ht6.6,-,! 0 0 ::..1\;;o:to: ti.;010mbia Risigo midi-11i 1'!t6,,,6,:;.. A/ Sf-062.-82.:' We thank youforyour Bmines3 am!Prompt Payment! I a I I I I I 11•11111•1. I , :,-,r,L4,... v'rim i KANSFER STAIION 1 OF LADING/WEIGH Tict-trr EW VIEW OLYMPIC I • := ..i'' '::' ',37..,:°-' . ER STAT ogress: RANSF ION 1 .. . --;,--,1, i Ili 1,1,:::I.1'''' 1:./:' /Sit-t- I , i, (,- -..,i ,I '1 - ',/, IL- I =---`-. - I ' ...........,„ , ,,,,,,-.. i /it /4 .• . ,i_ ,,., ,, .. ,,,,,,, ..,:i ,c,,,,,, _ \i _. __ ,„,"., ,,,„ ,...„,... ...„ - N..,,, ' T I , ._ , ---i- -., 1''', - i .01- ' , .1,,,,,) \ 1 i, f ? f: ,) I 1 _..,......1. .. ,......„ ,.., . ._• I , ' • , .,, , Company _„ Date I Disposal Fa -,sfa- ctAtior, cility - Columbia Ridge Landfill & Recyclinc Tit? ,,,,4ca cl 18177 Cedar Springs Lane I . , .. Arlington, Oregon 97812 , i 'If:4# (541)454-2C30 Waste Proflie#4,_ -I)_,_' ..:*_:!„__----„' I Waste Tyne._ c - _--_, I Ex 'Ration Date IL2- '),--77 - ,---).• --:--,-,4-1& 1--' se Print',. ...., 44 ..... Date I I I - 1 OF LADING/WEIGH TICKET OLYMPIC VIEW I - ,-.--,,,,,,o- ,,,z--,, <,- 4,..',".tiliTeSS: TRANSFER STATION „--- ,A. -----c- ----- - ----- I .. ....."..r .....5— '' ,,,.. I , , .. , .. .. \.._ i I i II ...,.or I I , , ---: I t ''',..,„ i, I a , adtrIC , 2 Compark, I I ...:: Disposal Faality'„ Colombia Ridge Landfill lt, Rt,..,ottling t-,17,:' ...0aC: . 18177 Cedar Sprngs ,aria I 1 ,---: ,.= , ,,z-- Arlington, Oregon 9-'8-..;2 -:: - -- ',I 1 Tel# (541)454-2.(j3C - --,7\-- I ; Waste Type:_ 111 , ---,-.---, ,-.. Ex Iiration Date- , -- I ... - 5Th-. P.int) .„, I .. _ . - ,ers ,-tkrtit.. --- Date I I I 1 V trvv i KANSFER STATION I KIL OF LADING/WEIGH TICKET . OLYMPIC VIEW ...... me-,, „ ,a3i-i. Na :&.,.Address; , . . Ttlt,,NSF! 11_:>,,,N,, .. . , I •rj.4' •'!..• ,,,-,---_, STATION : Vs' „,, .,. — I .,,., ---,,- ? . : t- ( , — .. , / " S, /41 1 II .... I `■,. ,. , : / ' 1%, I i 4/ , , . s.,, , t.,, - ; ' ''l' . , I „ . . , I , i , , . , I ...oadirg ! ,. I Company Date . . , ' - ,.....__________ ....„._.........._„... I .. ._ . Disposal Facility: Columbia Ridge i2ridilii Si.,Recycling fac„,+„ 18177 Cedar Springs Lane 11 -,,-- Drc ‘,,,'..td -,,,;18--Y57 , Arlington, Oregon 97812 Tet# (541)454-2030 I I Waste Profile : .'„,,' i . , . I , ;...nr.ailer,F. Ex*iration Date: I ,--r--,7,..•,:r's'lame `01e,,ase..Print) . , . I es `-' ,natt,,.1--,-„; Date I I I - , _ ,...„-o" :,‘ADING/Vi/EIGH TIC:tfin' , W OLYrAP1C VIE 1 TRANSFER b-- 4ATION -.o.:'''• .,-...f ---------- --- - , I 7/. .3.0.,,‘.44•'''.,:„;.*'° '''' __,,.--,,,,'C,:- i I A.,:,,6:: l'iiirii P.. il_ ,..1.1.,t ,_, „`-„„,:' L f,ti, -`4--4, •1)1 .,'":„.,!!\ 1 I .,.., .,, k i , 01.• ' L ' ' I ,, ^ _ ' , . -.. ' '-2 '',,, _,_ ... 's• _, ..- '%',- ., ... °- ' . - I I ,, ---'''' , - _ . I dinc". --1-(41.4 id- ' , . I - -, omparly ,- -- '-- „' Date I - Disposal Facility', ..atcr' : .-. --'- ' '11:.-F-.. 'z,oa-- rolumbia Ridge candfill & i 18177 Cedar Springs i_a.-rie Arlington Oregon 97812 I - - --' I k I '_ I EiraUopDte .),E:?,„Ise prt‘f it I , - , , Date I I , . r- LADING H ICK1ST __ I k _. t 5:' # eg , c 1 I i! ,, •-su '�aa-saviw. ra , v.: v 3. a4 .. ..._. , V� III Y i . , 0 II 6 • ..✓ f 1, p Company . Disposal Fae" ite -Ce r Columbia Badge Re ., . .a :".oar:- e, ,., 13177 7 Ceder Springs & 3 Aril , r r ,21, 1-r TI ei 541)45 ^s G ,»y .._ i.� is tt orofle# I„, 4. a w . _ . ,.. ..N..__°• __ ,,_,. I Ex*irabon Date ',-,---:-s-----/---,------------ —.-,. .. ,,rr.. i .---‘3.- ” , Y-'.. '._. Date I I , a S .v ' . ', w ,d .. .:, ....... , . 4„, . . . 4., ,, : _ , ,, ....,.. ,,,:,,,,,,,, ,„.., . „... ,y . ,,, ,v, ,(9,,,,r,4•,.---, II . f �., ' ,. a�' I $ .� r�. I ‘,..ornrrarirr Disposal Facility: .. i Columbia Ridge Lan-rill-O. Lt _d."e ea,S'Ei<.w 18177 Ce a& S,p 4 pg add Arlington, °r on 7.',1..' r ..ems yte rli ;f 0, s 1 ..... ..._ Type:: i t') �..��. ..�_ . Date I I1,6.7.1, OLYMP 1 e5. LU‘ 1 I ''''-4'is t-i- OF LADING!WEIGH TlettET .. ........._ TRANSFER S" W•...., . ,. 1 ciress: , - . -,... . .•tt''.t,f:' ,,;,'... .'..."`"", 1 0, j tia:. ,, ,,, tfl ')q 7 'Z I ■ .../.;k' ' '' ' .,..' C/ i 1\ (■■••.7 Pi. I V I 1 7 , ' 1 10 ' ,, L,Ij I 11 6)ifkl "'' 1 -11-1-141 • 1 _ /0 / 5-7-'4:3--- i . I , . ,,,,.,-, -- , i - Cii (,;(...-- ----').--) '---; .., t ,..._ i -----__..., -- ' I _ .....__ .........___, ......... .t 4 , - - ,-; - ..... „„„,„_,......, ..4.,.....1..._, .-..... , .... ._,........_--------- 4 - i 1 t I . i, II - -,a r, ri .... _ '1,- , , 1 ,,, "-1 k (,. •i. k-t i(- ' . .... _ CompanY_ I ( i • fe-Station 1 Dlsposal Facility: - p.. ycnc .,....=., 2 , Cllunlbia Ridge Landrit. & ,,er,„ , _ kr„fac 18177 Cedar Springs Lane Arlington, Oregon 97?.;12 I Tel# (S41)454-703C :„DOard-500prn ---------- ---------- .. .'-'•'::::r ",`,...,'"' I ,111 11 -7 4,(,-,,,,,/ •, km,' ' te ,nlite 1 . , Vklaste Tyoe.,mc ., ____, „„,_ I , *iradon 1 '- -''s -, ;71,? :°!easi, Print', InatULtS Date I I _ I I: n OLYPA t., s 4 --. ---,., -- :„-- tr o2.a2--, ` »'ai' "+"bra' .'" .�ra.- y ° "fit 1 I I 3 iu I Y - 3di k Comn ` Disposal Facility* ati -; ) Co1umbia Ridge Lancitil, S, Recvcling W _. : 1 13177 Cedar Spnrgs Lane 'lei* (5411)4154-;11:3(' iWaste rofile,,`"�t ._.»..._•: i iWaste Tye____m_. 1 ire 0nr __ I I • IFoo& 60 NO5 uLi ' 1, 4 ;..; ��/ 1 I I . ULYMPIC VIEW dC cr STATICr • fEm 1P .;e T. z` 1 0 x H . .., mV.. .._. ...__ I •/ .�r� ` F i 1 L ...,,. .„,,,.--„,.., 0 p 4 . I ,k. .. . Sit I AND GRAVEL.. . 111 ELAN c Al T MEf N AND PORT (.111-0„:10A(41,: (350)475-4528 (206)682&3 9 (2 53)5 57-3C { e >a`.1TT NC- TO: P.O. ?'OX-t a ALJO-DF)N.WASHNOTON 9307T E Vi1.7.0:,- ! ',;j ...0E0 2 6 8 1 � . � y € u? ... ._ i ,f74 L 11 0 JD ,4 ......E ., ..... .............. _ irr i P 'T SAND � 9 1 j .........E ' 1 E yq3 ToT AI I .(LES I a ..,. ",i'.'::::::',..,1, ,.a I I 1 I Q4'.'3 I -.`', - *---------7 A ,:-‘1.--2',',:::1 _ I .. i(9-/ • ' ' I PORT ORCHARD SAND AGRAVEL co INC I ,,,,,,,S AT .1.,t-iEtviE ilT0t4 AND Pni:IT OPC,,i-{ARP TELEPH:..)NE (360)479-4626 (206)682-6349 (253)857-300G MAIL FIEMMTANCE TO P.O.BOX 130 AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98071 {,'',:.=..-,rom,,,•.,',,z>$4',:',",1?P16-1.4e,;i:,"--,,, 7-?...;,.' I ' ' , . '..-;;..Z0(.....:' . ,, 1 -7', , i; i .'''' , -,', ‘,, ,....,,Mq:,Q i , rn, _, ,21,_ _ • , , „ . f \4,,ii .-- , ,'" ', , „...,„, , ,„ .„z,.“ , ,, t_, , I I is,ENT E4 rrn i . . , I I ; . , i 71.;:,/.,.. ,04jAtorryi Ls..21, . ,r,i..,;<z-ai::;:.A.,;?5r17:"<:j..:A*8CR*1*tOM..V;.4c';F ''1 4:$4410E:-: - '''' MtXnfi'''''''''':'''''''''11,, .1 Ii '',rA ,,,' i GRAVEL i ,,„„ry1 r , s , . . .,",1 kho ALD I . ---- PIT 1 A i 1 -4- I ii 11 : li PIT SANT) ; i ; - ' - ! 1 :ENVIR, CON1P. , : i _ 1 -1- . ,,,,i I '1 .4'1 i '''''1C, ) i- I . < ---\ 1 41-^ , " f ,. ' t . I _., .1,47_..._„„„.......„ # A.)., !j. ,„.4 f g A."‘ ' - I , . 1 t , . 1 --4 .4 1 ', : , , , ----t--- , 1 I 1 1 '., , .,4. 1- 1 4 ' 1 1 i 1 I TT 1. i 1 j , . i 1 . 1 ' ' 1 . .. . .. 1 .1 ....1 .., i I .. J .1 ' I TERMS; NO 30 ESSY'3.NI EREST A" IHE.MA.VEE:E. 4,...i..0'' b1h RA.`1,.' 1 'SUS i WILE PE CKEFES1E,E5 ON PAST.DEA'ACS.S.ANE11 1 sm-E TOTAL , . s I 1 .S•.;5.."..,,,;', • r..'S`,..3¢,T.. in.';..5-F:.■ANO.'- ,N'',..TC.,e, ,%.,... .;'-, `M- 1 5M-F“:5 ; •J I X ., ' / - --"----- , ,, 12n.:"tit.F..N;tc" ',TOTAL ,1 ,; : , I ;.'i,-;:.:..„,F.; : I 1 I ' : , i.....L...;,---j,,,,-,-,'37,,,Zzi:3 i E PORT ( : SAND AND GRAVEL Co,. Tric, ' PL ANTS Al. E3Iii,MEWONASN...1PORTCRCHARE E 't''H .NP: (360)479-4626 (206)6824349 (253)857-3006 MAIL€EWTTA " .TO PO.SOX 130 LI URN WASHINGTON s8071 „_�_ , A r _.,... t z J I i _ , ., e,�...:._.. _rA ,� I ...ran t' q .._.i C t :ft ,° € t `D�" ; Vi f k i t t ! k it Hut) ! 1 F , I 1 [ H , H .{ £ T W ' € 7 . I . Tr � Ni.t a � i}x� <S e &. :cP�1,, rk.-; SLf� ¢ '•; •:.r 9,, . -..•-,-,,F4-4,1'(Y,*& >£Yr^ E y.iAL E I . I I I I I .'" I ''' PORT ORCHARD I , g-IVOICE . 4,, '-: N AND„„ ---- GRAVEL I Co.S: ND: L.0 AND ..,,,,,,t ,...< INC., .. 1 • P•:,,,,,,N rs A!. PHEM'iHION Atin PO;i1 f:`,,RChio.,-.Nly . . .. . ...„ . ..ti,..r...f'Hu=Ni.• 4.31i0 4i ii-4626 (206)6824349 t2t,„,i1 8 7- 008 MA;i.REkitTIANOE TO; P.O.SOX 130 .• AUBURN.WASHINGT011 98071 I ....„ I I • ', ,P.6*,.P:45ittiAtrieW.ri: :' 1,:%,:23=t.'2j'.kg.0044401,010WAX;:,'-',;:iitg.Fliatritt, `.'•••.0 .":;,!',4146,10r,i,:gt:!, ....;::':- ..,•': , . AND D , : S I I ./ , - ,,J---, . ,: G RA V I-! tfII,,r, , I 1 -1- I , . .. ..,. . . I . , . ,•-• 1 . I Ilt.IN I ,... : PIT SAND I - . , 1 I _EINVI/1 {.;OMF,. , ,.. ,,.. i4.41 1 1 il-\,,„ 1 i , . i ' , 1 4 4 , i f ' ' . ' 41!'. r i . . , , 1 1 .1 .; , , 1 i i 1 I „ 'z' t . , ' 1 . ,.. i i , 1 i 1, , 1 , 1 .„, I 1 i ! 1 4 1 1 . ,.„.. : I 3 ERMS: 44f.'.'..,,, OA, m,ky.,4k)',4 SILLS ,,,,,„i,„..,,.+,..:,..',H,:-,i88 of-i P,,:-i;,„•-i'ii.,,,.'-ii)iiNT:"..', . , 1 , I , ,, .. , : . .... . ziz.4w.,i,•:,::::i:.§. i , I I I I I a- -- 111 / •°"3 PORE ORCHARD I SAND 3 GRAVEL co. iNc, ..... pLANIS AU eir4P,IEH'f ON ANN PUNT r“.-CHAFiD r R.F.PHQNF (360)479-4626 (206)682-6349 (253)857-3006 I . i?„.ii,,r,,,,,,,i7 ni1:14.....:: ,,F....i.,E,711,,f,'..T.,,T,,AK.N)CE T(:). P.0,BOX 130 AUBURN,WASKAGTSN 98011 .16A',T. ''',..:..,,,:,,::-,f r - ,•-::m.,*;; '1 ,P ' 2 - 4 6 n - - ,..,.. ,...., „,,,.... . .„,i. i ..... 1 . I I- t.-----1- , ---,,,, ,..-,,,,, i,,,f .2' , . _,,, , -,-.-.. , ' . „ , , 1 , , ,"<... • , , 1 ' - 111 1 . SAND , , ' „ „ I I .4. . . 1 ''' GRAVEL, I . . ! I CRLJSHED : 4 . , : 1 II. ...I. •,.. . „ „ I RUN ' . : . .it` , Pi 1 SAND , i 1 I ' , , - : . . ,.. . ' / "i '',"\ ..1 E N\,1 E, # , .„ „) „ . , . ' ....._„.. . . ...,. , ../.....,, , , „ , , fr‘,L:4 41 A44-4,4 it?-444 i I III I I. 1 I . , : . . ': : .„4. . I . . . : 4. 11 i— 4„ I I I I:I. I I I „Ii ---- # 1 ' I 4 . , I : 4 ' I, 1 1 , . 1 , . , '..H-..; MA,,,2,1,1uh4.A;,;(:',V.,... i,,, Hz.'"1, ! SUB 1 TAX i/ .' -"' .1).itl'•4ggi 1",Ny 1 tOTAti: . I X ....., I I ill I . "] I OCT 0 6 2003 g WA DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REAI ESTATE SERVICES } PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT GARRISON PROPERTY DISCOVERY BAY - HIGHWAY 101 DISCOVERY BAY, WASHINGTON 98365 PREPARED FOR: DON MILLER CHIEF APPRAISER REAL ESTATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 600 CAPITAL WAY NORTH OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 PROJECT: SALMON AND SNOW CREEK CONTRACT No. E:PS-03.09 } PREPARED BY: DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 2400 NW 80Th STREET #114 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98117 SEPTEMBER 15, 2003 DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 LUG iTEM im Department of Fish and Wildlife ! September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page i EXECUTIVE REPORT A Phase I - Environmental Audit (ESA) was conducted on the property identified as the Garrison Property. The property consists of approximately 35 acres and is developed with numerous structures associated with a former wood veneer mill (RR Brown Pole Company), log storage,and railroad access.The remainder of the property is undeveloped with wetlands, tidal, and estuary land. Two creeks intersect the site and drain into Discovery Bay. The current property owner, Hargrave Garrison, purchased the property from the CMC Real Estate Company (Chicago Milwaukee Railroad) In 1988 and 1989. Historical use information is from the current property owner and information he was given at the time of purchase. The buildings located on the western portion of the site are associated with a wood ° . veneer mill that was constructed by the Brown family around the mid to late 1930s. The Brown family operated that mill until it was shut down by Stem Brown in the mid 1950s. Except for shoring and a few repairs, none of the mill buildings have been used since that time. The railroad track was removed in 1988. According to the current property owner, two of the five buildings located on the eastern portion of the site might have been brought onto the property (barged in from Indian Island) and used for residential or office purposes. The other buildings consist of a small shed (use unknown); a large shed used for repairs on railroad cars and log scrap storage; and another building that was built by the Brown family (use unknown). Other than household, retail/commercial furniture, and equipment storage, these buildings have not been used since the 1950s. The subject site supports a large mix of wildlife including otters, eagles, deer, and numerous bird species. Oysters and clam beds are numerous and fish, including perch, sturgeon, and salmon, are found in the waters. The surrounding properties consist of an eclectic mix of small commercial and retail businesses including a railroad car restaurant, ice cream and candy shop, gift store, video store, thrift store, surplus store, restaurant and cabin rental facility, a large trucking, excavating, and equipment company( Larrance) that was formerly a gasoline . station, and a small grocery store that also had gasoline at one time. Several restaurants, a motel, and residential properties are also in the vicinity. The purpose of the ESA was to assess the potential for environmental impact to the subject site due to onsite and offsite hazardous material and waste use, storage, and disposal from past and present practices. DLH S ! 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 I i LO 1i EM r Department of Fish and Wildlife 7t * . September 15, 2003 rt Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page ii This ESA was done in accordance with standards set forth in ASTM'E 1527-00. Under E ASTM E 1527, 12.1.4., except where noted below, none of the "non-scope 4 considerations" were addressed in this ESA. • Radon: No radon issues have been noted in the site area, and no radon testing was conducted. Radon information for the area is documented in EDR Research Data located in Appendix B. • Wetlands: Wetland studies were not in the scope of work for this project but have been determined for the site and surrounding areas. • Lead paint and asbestos survey: None of the buildings on site are painted so lead paint is not an issue. Asbestos-containing material was found. The scope of work for this assessment consisted of the following: Site reconnaissance including building inspections. Historical review, including title information, county assessors files, historical aerial photographs, and interviews with local Environmental Health Department, Fire Department, and Jefferson County Development employees. • Review of current and historical use,storage, and disposal of known hazardous materials and wastes. • Review of available regulatory agency lists of regional environmental issues. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS DLH Environmental Consulting is pleased to submit the enclosed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), which was conducted on the property referred to as the Garrison Property located at Discovery Bay, Washington. Our research indicates that the site is approximately 35 acres, portions of which were developed as a wood veneer mill in the mid to late 1930s by the Brown family who leased the land from the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad. A railroad line was built in approximately 1915 that accessed the mill and logging that took place in the area. The railroad connected Port Angeles and Port Townsend. According to the current property owner, Mr. Hargrave Garrison, who purchased the land from the CMC Real Estate Company (Chicago Milwaukee rail road), the mill was shut down in approximately 1955 and the buildings have not been occupied or used (other than some stora9e) since that time. Mr. Garrison has conducted some minor repairs to the building to keep them stabilized and has repaired the old DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 Department of Fish and Wildlife h Yr September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay A Page iii railroad trellises over one of the tidal inlets and over two streams (Snow and Salmon) } that intersect the property. There are three main buildings and a two small sheds associated with the mill that are still standing and an additional four buildings that include a railroad car repair and log storage shed,three home structures, and one small shed. Since the Garrisons' ownership, these building have only been used for storage. Some of the original equipment used in the mill is still present. The reminder of the property is undeveloped wetland areas and tidal land. Two streams cut across the property (Snow Creek and Salmon Creek) and there are several ponds that were created for log storage that are now oyster spawning areas. Mr Garrison noted that the tidelands and property are used by otters, deer, and numerous birds. There are also perch, sturgeon,and salmon in the waters. Based on the site reconnaissance and building inspections the following environmental conditions were noted: Creosote-coated pilings are located underneath some of the mill buildings. Other creosote-coated lumber on the ground is probably left over from the removal of the railroad tracks on the northern portion of the site (minimal quantities) ♦ Stained soil is located in and around the old mill equipment on the northern portion of the site (limited small quantities) • Asbestos-containing cement asbestos board was noted on the interior walls of two of the buildings located on the south-central portion of the property ♦ Asbestos-containing paper was noted in one of the small sheds on the south- central portion of the.site (minimal amount) ♦ Floor staining was noted in one large storage building where railroad cars were possibly repaired in the south-central portion of the site (amounts unknown) • Miscellaneous material is stored on the site by the property owner including tools, old household/retail furniture and business equipment ♦ It is likely that the septic systems associated with the old buildings were drain fields or emptied directly to the bay. No evidence of septic tanks was visible and Mr. Garrison did not know of any. One building may have had a concrete septic DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 1r r � Department of Fish and Wildlife ..�.r. _..1, / September 15, 2003 e‘t Garrison Property/Discovery Bay " °‘4b4.' 2 Page iv tank that appears to have dumped directly into the bay. No violations are on file with the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. No underground or above ground fuel storage tanks were evident and the owner was not aware of any tanks. No tanks are on file with the Washington State Department of Ecology. + The south-central portion of the site is adjacent to Larrance Trucking, which was formerly a gasoline station. No data with regards to that station is on file with the Washington State Department of Ecology, the Fire Department, or the Shoreline Management Division of Jefferson County. It is not known if the underground tanks were removed. There are above ground tanks stored onsite and numerous automobiles and heavy equipment. Further information about this site would be necessary to make any determinations about potential impact to the subject site. There is also a closed gasoline station (noted below under UST listings) across. the highway from the central portion of the property. The gas station (Discovery Bay Grocery Store) was reported closed; with one tank closed in-place and two removed, but no other information about subsurface soil data is on file. + Regulatory lists were researched using the Environmental Data Resource, Inc. (EDR) data base. Copies of these lists are located in Appendix B. The following information was obtained from a review of the lists: - The subject site is not on any site list. No surrounding sites within a one-mile radius appear on any of the following lists: NPL, Proposed NPL, Delisted NPL, NPL Liens, FINDS, HMIRS, CSCSL, CSCSL NFA, SPILLS, EMI, HSL,SWF/LF, CERCLIS, CERC - NFRAP, CORRACTS, RCRIS-TSD, RCRIS-LQG, RCRIS-SQG, landfills,LUST, RAATS, PADS, FINDS, ROD, HMRIS, PADS, ERNS, TRIS, NPL Lien, TSCA, MLTS, MINES, CONSENT, SSTS, FITS, WA EMISSIONS, Air Emissions, WA ICR, VCP, INDIAN'USTs, and Coal Gas (a list of these acronyms is located in the EDR reference in Appendix B of this report). One underground storage tank (UST) site is listed within a 1/4 mile of the site. A gasoline station at Discovery Bay Grocery is listed as a closed site with one tank closed in place and two tanks removed. No other data is listed. DL H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 LuG i4 ; I Department of Fish and Wildlife eptember 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page v Based on this Environmental Site Assessment, the record search, and the report conclusions, the following recommendations are made at this time Creosote coated poles and railroad ties that are accessible should be removed from the property • Asbestos should be removed from walls of the two buildings and from the floor of the small shed. These buildings are located on the south-central portion of the site. ♦ All material stored by the Garrisons should be removed. • If required by the WDFW the mill equipment and any stained soils associated with the equipment should be removed. Hazardous materials associated with the old equipment may be present. These materials may include fuses or old wiring that contain mercury, asbestos insulation, or lubricating oils and greases. The quantity of these items probably would be,minimal. . . • Soil sampling and analysis should be condu ���iS l� 0.1. !/ (south-central portion) where old railroad c serviced. There appears to be some stained -`'9Je5716( °`ct�Gl� L • For future restoration purposes, a 10,000 ga a".ototve devise should be removed. (See photo in Al ♦ The Larrance Trucking and Excavation Corn' ^ fT(fl/ c �q subject site. This property has suspicious he S +z- C- Le-0-41. formerly a gasoline station with no WDOE k e possible subsurface soil investigations woulc needed regarding the potential of environm' DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 , , LCiGs iFi .,.....7k. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services 1 { 2.0 SITE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 2 2.1 Site Location and Existing Improvements 2 2.2 Site Reconnaissance 2 2.2.1 Electrical Transformers 3 2.2.2 Asbestos Review 3 2.2.3 Lead Paint Sampling 3 2.3 Hazardous Material and Waste Use, Storage, and Disposal 3 2.3.1 Storage Tanks 3 2.3.2 Hazardous Materials 3 2.3.3 Emission Sources 4 2.3.4 Waste Water Discharge Sources 4 3.0 REGIONAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 4 3.1 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting 4 3.1.1 Soil Conditions 4 3.1.2 Groundwater 4 3.2 Historical Review 5 3.3 Review of Government Agency Lists 5 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 6 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 6.0 LIMITATIONS 10 REFERENCES 11 , APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Site Map, Site Photographs APPENDIX B - Regulatory Lists (EDR Research Data) APPENDIX C - Historical information, Jefferson County tax files APPENDIX D- Supporting Documentation and Title Information DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 Department of Fish and Wildlife -. � �� _ September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay "' Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION DLH Environmental Consulting (DLH) was retained by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site referred to as the Garrison property located along highway 101 in Discovery Bay, Washington. 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of the ESA was to assess the potential for environmental impact to the ti subject site due to onsite or offsite hazardous material and waste use, storage,and disposal from past and present practices. Information obtained and made available concerning the environmental condition of the subject site and surrounding region was reviewed. The ESA was accomplished by, and limited to, a site survey including building inspections and a review of readily available documents, government agency lists, and land use history as obtained from available sources. The scope of services provided by DLH included these activities: • Conducted an on-site reconnaissance of the property to access the presence of { obvious hazardous materials and wastes on the property Obtained information about adjacent properties to evaluate if the properties contain facilities or structures that could potentially contaminate the subject site with hazardous materials in the past or future. ♦ Reviewed regulatory agency lists and files to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous materials on the property or adjoining properties. • Reviewed of all ASTM standards regulatory lists of the site and surrounding properties • Reviewed available historical data (including aerial photographs) of the subject site and surrounding areas. Reviewed data provided by the Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) including appraisal information and title information. D L H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 44 te7 r Department of Fish and Wildlife -- September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page 2 • Interviewed local agencies (Fire Departments, Environmental Health Department) regarding the site and surrounding properties. ♦ Prepared a report presenting the results, conclusions, and recommendations of the site assessment. 2.0 SITE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS a 2.1 Site Location and Existing Improvements The site consists of approximately 35 acres of land located at the head of,Discovery Bay. Highway 101 is located on the west side of the property (along with some commercial property),and the tidal waters of Discovery Bay are on the east side of the property. The northern portion of the property is the site of a former wood veneer mill that was started in the mid to late 1930s and closed in the mid 1950s.The Chicago Milwaukee Railroad used to run down the middle of the property but the track was taken up in 1988. The south-central portion of the site has several building associated with the mill. The remainder of the property consists of undeveloped land, tidal flats, estuaries, and two creeks that intersect the property: Snow Creek and Salmon Creek. None of the buildings onsite are occupied and have not been used since the mill closed. The current owner has done some minor repairs on the buildings to keep them stabilized and has used several of the building for personal storage. The surrounding properties consist of an eclectic mix of small commercial and retail businesses including a railroad car restaurant, ice cream and candy shop, gift store, video store, thrift store, surplus store, restaurant and cabin rental facility, a large trucking, excavating, and equipment company (Larrance) that was a former gasoline station, and a small grocery store that also had gasoline at one time. Several restaurants, a motel, and residential properties are also in the vicinity. Major thoroughfares include SR 101, which borders the western portion of the site. Landmarks include Discovery Bay (bordering the site), the town of Port Townsend approximately 15 miles to the northeast, and Sequim Bay and the town of Sequim approximately 20 miles to the northwest. 2.2 Site Reconnaissance . On September 8, 2003 a site reconnaissance was conducted by DLH at the subject site. A concurrent review of previous studies, historical data, and government agency related information was conducted. Results of these reviews and findings are presented below. DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 grr LOU Department of Fish and Wildlife 10,2 September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay . Page 3 2.2.1 Electrical Transformers Electrical transformers and light ballasts are a potential source of Poly Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs),which are considered hazardous materials. Old fluorescent light ballasts are also a potential source of PCBs. Electrical equipment associated with mill equipment is still on site and''may contain PCBs but it is unlikely. No other sources were noted or obvious. 2.2.2 Asbestos Review An asbestos survey was not included in the scope of work for this property. However, there is asbestos-containing cement asbestos board (CAB) in two of the buildings. This materials is located on all of the walls of two buildings and was most likely used as insulation. The materials is cracked and damaged in several places but is in otherwise good condition. A small shed located in the same vicinity of these buildings has asbestos paper on the floor. The use is unknown. This material is friable and damaged. 2.2.3 Lead Paint Sampling A lead paint survey was not included in the scope of work for this property. However, none of the buildings are painted. 23 Hazardous Material and Waste Use, Storage, and Disposal 2.3.1 Storage Tanks No petroleum or hazardous waste related underground storage tanks (USTs) or above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were noted on the property. No signs of old pipes were noted and the owner was unaware of any tanks on site. An abandoned tank that may have been used as a septic tank is located onsite. It is empty and the owner said it had always been onsite so the actual use is unknown. 2.3.2 Hazardous Materials Creosote coated poles were noted underneath some of the mill buildings that are on the north end of the property. In addition, the owner indicated that there are still a few old railroad ties located onsite that were left when the railroad track DLH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 zivi Department of Fish and Wildlife �——,.. . . . „ September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay e 4 was disassembled. According to the owner, most of the ties were removed from the property but a few of them where left behind. Some cans of paint were noted in one of the buildings that the owner uses for storage. It is understood that all materials stored in the buildings will be removed by the owner. Asbestos in the form of cement asbestos board (CAB) and some asbestos paper noted above was encountered. ` No other obvious materials were encountered. There may be some materials associated with the mill equipment that was unaccessible due to building integrity or not obvious during the site inspection. This may include equipment lubricants or fuses. 2.3.3 Emission Sources t II No emission sources were noted. 2.3.4 Waste Water Discharge Sources No waste water discharges were noted. The buildings most likely had out houses ' or septic disposal directly to the bay. 3.0 REGIONAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 3.1 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting 3.1.1 Soil Conditions Subsurface soil studies were not a part of the scope of work for this assessment. Based on location, it appears that the subsurface soils are mostly sands and gravels. 3.1.2 Groundwater Groundwater studies were not a part of the scope of work for this assessment. However, there are water wells on the site. One water well (concrete sump) pumps fresh water from about three feet below ground level. DL H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 206 632-3123 LOG i EM Department of Fish and Wildlife , sof / September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay -°� Page 5 Depth to groundwater is probably one to three feet below ground level dependant on tidal activities. Due to the proximity of the bay, groundwater likely would be brackish. There are also two streams that intersect the property and r _ run into Discovery Bay. These are Snow Creek and Salmon Creek and are located on the northeastern portion of the site. Depth to potable drinking water is unknown. � u } 3.2 Historical Review The majority of the site's historical data was provided by the current property owner. Mr. Garrison purchased the property from the CMC Real Estate Company (Chicago Milwaukee Railroad) in the 1988 and 1989. The Brown family originally constructed the wood veneer mill onsite, but they leased the land from the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad. Additional historical information was provided by reviewing title history (Appendix D) and tax assessment information (Appendix C), and historical aerials photos provided by Mr. Garrison and on file at the Jefferson County Assessor's office (Appendix C). Other information was obtained through interviews with Port Townsend and Discovery Bay residents, the Fire Department, Shoreline Management Division, Environmental Health Division, and Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) Data (Appendix B). Aerial photographs dated 1942, 1965, 1972, 1990, and 1997 were researched for development information. No other developments other than the original mill buildings are noted on the property. The surrounding area has remained relatively unchanged over the last 30 years. Some residential properties have been built up but no major commercial additions have been added or removed from the area with the exception of the"Railroad Car Depot" development(gifts and food). Prior to the 1960's the only major change was the relocation of Highway 101 which was moved inland from its original site. 3.3 Review of Government Agency Lists A complete review of the EDR regulatory lists research was conducted. Please note that the address for the EDR search is listed as 282023 SR 101, which is the mailing address and covers the entire site area, The EDR regulatory lists information and a summary is located in Appendix B of this report. A list of acronyms is also located in Appendix B. The results of the search indicates that the subject site is not on any list. DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 Department of Fish and Wildlife ?` , ��''� September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay 5 `7 Page 6 One site within a one-mile radius is listed. The Discovery Bay Grocery Store is listed as a former gasoline station. The site is listed as closed with one tank closed in place and two tanks removed. There is no data on the subsurface soils or concerning any cleanup was conducted at the site. Although the Larrance Trucking and Excavating site is within a one-mile radius and had a gasoline station, no data is available in the Washington State Department of Ecology data base. According to WDOE files, no data has ever been recorded regarding that site. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are based on information that was gathered during the course of this Environmental Site Assessment and on a review of historical information, government agency lists, and additional data provided by EDR. Our research indicates that the site is approximately 35 acres, portions of which were developed as a wood veneer mill in the mid to late 1930s by the Brown family who leased the land from the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad. A railroad line was built in approximately 1915 that,accessed the mill and logging that took place in the area. The railroad connected Port Angeles and Port Townsend. According to the current property owner, Mr. Hargrave Garrison, who,purchased the land from the CMC Real Estate Company (Chicago Milwaukee rail road), the mill was shut down in approximately 1955 and the buildings have not been occupied or used (other than some storage) since that time. Mr. Garrison has conducted some minor repairs to the building to keep them stabilized and has repaired the old railroad trellises over one of the tidal inlets and over two streams (Snow and Salmon) that intersect the property. There are three main buildings and a two small sheds associated with the mill that are still standing and an additional four buildings that include a railroad car repair and log storage shed, three home structures, and one small shed. Since the Garrisons'ownership, these building have only been used for storage. Some of the original equipment used in the mill is still present. The reminder of the property is undeveloped wetland areas and tidal land. Two streams cut across the property (Snow Creek and Salmon Creek) and there are several ponds that were created for log storage that are now oyster spawning areas. Mr Garrison noted that the tidelands and property are used by otters, deer, and numerous birds. There are also perch, sturgeon, and salmon in the waters. DL H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 L 7,11 777-- . .. Department of Fish and Wildlife - 7��„-...... ` September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay A of Page 7 Based on the site reconnaissance and building inspections the following environmental conditions were noted: • Creosote-coated pilings are located underneath some of the mill buildings. Other creosote-coated lumber on the ground is probably left over from the removal of the railroad tracks on the northern portion of the site (minimal quantities) • Stained soil is located in and around the old mill equipment on the northern portion of the site (limited small quantities) • Asbestos-containing cement asbestos board was noted on the interior walls of two of the buildings located on the south-central portion of the property • ! • Asbestos-containing paper was noted in one of the small sheds on the south- central portion of the site (minimal amount) • Floor staining was noted in one large stora9e building where railroad cars were possibly repaired in the south-central portion of,the site (amounts unknown) • Miscellaneous material is stored on the site by the property owner including • tools, old household/retail furniture and business equipment • ♦ It is likely that the septic systems associated with the old buildings were drain fields or emptied directly to the bay. No evidence of septic tanks was visible and Mr. Garrison did not know of any. One building may have had a concrete septic tank that appears to have dumped directly into the bay. No violations are on file with the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. • No underground or above ground fuel storage tanks were evident and the owner was not aware of any tanks. No tanks are on file with the Washington State Department of Ecology. • The south-central portion of the site is adjacent to Larrance Trucking, which was formerly a gasoline station. No data with regards to that station is on file with the Washington State Department of Ecology;the Fire Department, or the Shoreline Management Division of Jefferson County. `It is not known if the underground tanks were removed. There are above ground tanks stored onsite and numerous automobiles and heavy equipment. Further information about this site would be necessary to make any determinations about potential impact to the subject site. DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 Department of Fish and Wildlife `.= September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page 8 • There is also a closed gasoline station (noted below under UST listings) across the highway from the central portion of the property. The gas station (Discovery Bay Grocery Store) was reported closed; with one tank closed in-place and two removed, but no other information about subsurface soil data is on file. • Regulatory lists were researched using the Environmental Data Resource,Inc. (EDR) data base. Copies of these lists are located in Appendix B. The following information was obtained from a review of the lists: - The subject site is not on any site list. - No surrounding sites within a one-mile radius appear on any of the following lists: NPL, Proposed NPL, Delisted NPL, NPL Liens, FINDS, HMIRS, CSCSL, CSCSL NFA, SPILLS, EMI, HSL, SWF/LF, CERCLIS, CERC - k NFRAP, CORRACTS, RCRIS-TSD, RCRIS-LQG, RCRIS-SQG, landfills, LUST, RAATS, PADS, FINDS, ROD, HMRIS, PADS, ERNS, IRIS, NPL Lien,TSCA, MLTS, MINES, CONSENT, SSTS, FITS, WA EMISSIONS, Air Emissions, WA ICR, VCP, INDIAN USTs, and Coal Gas (a list of these acronyms is located in the EDR reference in Appendix B of this report). - One underground storage tank (UST) site is listed within a 1/4 mile of the site. A gasoline station at Discovery Bay Grocery is listed as a closed site with one tank closed in place and two tanks removed. No other data is listed. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on this Environmental Site Assessment, the record search, and the report conclusions, the following recommendations are made at this time. ♦ Creosote coated poles and railroad ties that are accessible should be removed from the property • Asbestos should be removed from walls of the two buildings and from the floor of the small shed. These buildings are located on the south-central portion of the site. • All material stored by the Garrisons should be removed. • If required by the WDFW the mill equipment and any stained soils associated D L H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 LUa 44;44d I D LH O ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 s ' 1 Department of Fish and Wildlife r September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay �. -' �.� "rLL Page 9 with the equipment should be removed. Hazardous materials associated with the old equipment may be present. These materials may include fuses or old wiring that contain`mercury, asbestos insulation, or lubricating oils and greases. The quantity of these items probably would be minimal. • Soil sampling and analysis should be conducted in the large storage building (south-central portion) where old railroad cars were reportedly stored and serviced. There appears to be some stained soils in this area. • For future restoration purposes, a 10,000 gallon tank that is used as a retaining 3 devise should be removed. (See photo in Appendix A). I ; • The Larrance Trucking and Excavation Company is located adjacent to the subject site. This property has suspicious housekeeping activities and was formerly a gasoline station with no WDOE records. Additional research and possible subsurface soil investigations would be required if more information is 1 needed regarding the potential of environmental impacts to the subject site. • a , tip i D L H ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 j t ) '� 13l M i Department of Fish and Wildlife ),, September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay „ . f e f} 9 Page 10 6.0 LIMITATIONS This report is for the exclusive use of the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. If new information is developed in future site work, which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., DLH Environmental Consulting should be allowed to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. The ' contents of this report are valid for a period of six (6) months after issue date. Conclusions are based on site conditions noted in the site inspection, on the review of site information collected and reviewed in August and September 2003, and on referenced material located in the appendices of this report. II Recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based on evaluation of technical information made available and reviewed during the course of this survey. Our work product and judgements rendered meet the care of our profession at this time. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional conclusions and recommendations included in this report. DLH Environmental Consulting shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were withheld, concealed, or not fully disclosed at the time the evaluation was performed. DLH Environmental Consulting.has no control over the accuracy of information provided by outside consultants, contractors, and agencies and, therefore,disclaims responsibility for any inaccuracies incurred. Also, DLH Environmental Consulting accepts no responsibility for verifying,compliance with government regulations for hazardous material and waste use or storage at the subject facility. The underlying philosophy in formulating the conclusions and recommendations was to is reduce uncertainties regarding the property and pertaining to environmental hazards,to •- -_.. the degree possible. Therefore, the results of this assessment should be viewed as reasonably accurate estimates, given the project limitations of the existing environmental condition of the property. £ . ........DLH • , ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 <. Department of Fish and Wildlife : , `�' � .�� ✓ ' September 15, 2003 Garrison Property/Discovery Bay Page 11 REFERENCES • Jefferson Title Company, Inc., Title Insurance Documents, June 25, 2001 • Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Inc., Geo-check and Sandborn Insurance Map Search Provided as Historical Research, and Government Agency Listings, August 2003 ♦ Jefferson County Tax Assessor, Aerial Photographs and Historical Files, September 2003 Garrison, Hargrave, Current Property Owner, Interview and Site Reconnaissance, September 2003 • Appraisal Data, Supplied by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, August 2003 t Fay, Larry, Director Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health, Telephone Interview, September 2003 t Cooper, Ben, Fire Chief, Gardner Fire Department District 5, Interview, September 2003 ♦ Amouck, Tom, Jefferson County Fire Department, Interview, September 11, 2003 • Ballard, Greg, Jefferson County Planning Department, Interview, September 11, 2003 DLHENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 632-3123 Donna Frostholm From: Pinky Feria Mingo ;� Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:57 PM `lair P. F. eq_L,--10 1— I f.- i4 To: Kevin Long C°D✓1 G�ti.�C Cc: Linda Atkins; Donna Frostholm _wi Subject: RE: Maynard Shoreline Testing "IAA- 5,0 tilt-64V 014--a d" Hello Kevin, Thanks for coming in and providing the soil characterization reports. I talked with Ecology today, and while the normal course of action is to report contamination and do the cleanup; it is not unusual for people to conduct independent cleanups.The downside to doing independent cleanups is that it may or may not meet Ecology specifications. In the case of the 2009 Soil Characterization, Ecology was in agreement with me regarding the need for additional sampling parameters—metals, and semi-volatiles(creosote, penta, and other PAHs—polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). His advice was that if contamination is confirmed during this next go around it should be reported. If you have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. (. STEM r From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 12:15 PM To: Pinky Feria Mingo Subject: RE: Maynard Shoreline Testing Hi Pinky, I have some reports for you to better understand the area where we are proposing excavation and to demonstrate cleanup of areas identified as contaminated. I have hard copy and would like to drop them off and review them with you.When would this be possible? Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition projectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: dlhenvironmental @ aol.com [mailto:dlhenvironmental @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:34 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: Fwd: Maynard Shoreline Testing FYI Donna Hewitt L.G. 2400 NW 80th St# 114 Seattle, WA 98117 206-632-3123 http://dIhenvironmentalconsulting.homestead.com 1 Original Message From: Pinky Feria Mingo <pinky(c co.jefferson.wa.us> LUG 'ITEM To: dlhenvironmental <dlhenvironmental @aol.com> Cc: Linda Atkins <LAtkins @co.jefferson.wa.us> Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2014 8:33 am +' ,� Subject: Maynard Shoreline Testing Hello Donna, Linda Atkins from our office referred your question to me. From Kevin Long's email: I have the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that was done on the property, I am unable to attach it as it is too large. The contamination issues identified in the report have already been mediated and I want to be sure your office is aware of that. If they are aware of it or if the condition remains I'd like to discuss conducting further site investigations prior to construction to meet the needs of this requirement if possible. County Answer No we, were not aware of that. If you can scan and email the summary it might suffice. Were the soils sent off-site? In any case, depending on what you plan to do with the soil will determine if additional sampling is necessary to confirm the soils are "clean." In general, the guidelines suggest 10 samples for 1001-2000 cy and 1 additional sample for every 500 cubic yards over 2000 cy. What will be the final disposition of the soils? Pinky Feria Mingo <<RE: Maynard Shoreline Soils Testing>> Environmental Health Specialist Jefferson County Public Health 615 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 pinky@co.iefferson.wa.us www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org http://www.ieffersoncountypublichealth.org/pdf/RecyclingReminders.pdf Click here to see what is recycled in Jefferson County 360 379 4489 `,A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. From: Linda Atkins<LAtkinseco.iefferson.wa.us> To: dlhenvironmental(c aol.com Cc: Pinky Feria Mingo<pinky a(�.co.iefferson.wa.us> Subject: RE: Maynard Shoreline Soils Testing Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:00:23-0800 I am referring your questions to Pinky Feria Mingo. She is our Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Lead and will be better able to assist you. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer anti field-Mier Jefferson County CO1FIDEVTIALITY-1OTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 4256: Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (Or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 4256: 2 From: dlhenvironmentalCaaol.com [mailto:dlhenvironmentak aol.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 5:00 PM To: projectmanager©nosc.orq; Linda Atkins Lt"l7 ITEM Subject: Re: Maynard Shoreline Soils Testing Linda, Please call me regarding this site so I can discuss required lab analysis. Thank You ! Donna Hewitt L.G. 2400 NW 80th St# 114 Seattle, WA 98117 206-632-3123 http://dlhenvironmentalconsulting.homestead.com Original Message From: Kevin Long <projectmanager nosc.orq> To: Dlhenvironmental <Dlhenvironmentalc aol.com> Sent: Fri, Feb 7, 2014 10:58 am Subject: Maynard Shoreline Soils Testing Hi Donna, I'm forwarding you and email from Jefferson County with the information they've provided to me. It is condition 17 that calls for this work. It reads: "For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecv/publications/publications/1009057.pdf." Exhibit X is attached. The link doesn't seem applicable unless we know we are removing contaminated soils. Maybe I'm missing something. I spoke with Linda Atkins at the County as it sounded to me like the condition required us to sample during project p Y q p gp J construction. She informed me this is not the intent and that sampling areas to be excavated prior to actual construction will be allowed. If you have questions on what exactly the county is looking for I would try Linda Atkins at 360 385-9403 or Y q Y Y 9 rY ( ) latkinsaco.iefferson.wa.us . Sampling plan will need to be in part coordinated with our design engineers as they now how deep we are digging and p 9p p 9 9 Y P g9 9 where. I will coordinate this and they are aware of this need. We expect to remove 14,000 cubic yards of material. Most of these areas are readily accessible to a tracked machine as long as it can walk through scotch broom. There is a buried waterline we will need to avoid in the RR grade. Some beach excavation will take place to shallow depths(1-2 feet)we will not be able to put a machine on the beach. These could be hand dug or if the machine has any reach, some might be bored on the beach from the RR grade. That should be enough info to get you started, and maybe to raise a whole bunch of questions. Let me know. Thank you, Kevin Kevin Long 3 Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition projectmanager(anosc.org LO j r (360)379-8051 / From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm(a�co.jefferson.wa.us] °agr Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:18 PM - --- To: Kevin Long; Linda Atkins Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin: Here is the exhibit. From: Kevin Long [mailto:proiectmanageranosc.orq] Sent:Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:44 PM To: Linda Atkins; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Permit conditions HI Again Donna, I spoke with Linda and got some clarification. Can you now clarify for me what"exhibit x" is?The document that is linked is 200 pages long and exhibit x might prove useful in getting me to the right spot in the linked document. Thanks as always, Kevin From: Linda Atkins[mailto:LAtkinsna.co.iefferson.wa.us] Sent:Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:31 PM To: Kevin Long; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin and Donna, This condition refers to the areas that were not dealt with directly in the industrial building location. Kevin, we talked about this in our office meeting to clarify several items. These would be soils in the area that would be to the north of the industrial site. If you have further questions and want me to go over the areas with you just give me a call. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County Co\FIDE TTALITY.1:OTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All email sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN'42.56. Inder the Public Records law the County must release this e- mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN'42.56. From: Kevin Long (mailto:proiectmanager(anosc.orq] Sent:Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:21 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Linda Atkins Subject: Re: Permit conditions Donna, Regarding Item 17. "For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf." 4 Who should I consult with at the County about this condition and how to satisfy it? I have the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that was done on the property, I am unable to attach it as it is too large. The contamination issues identified in the report have already been mediated and I want to be sure your office is aware of that. If they are aware of it or if the condition remains I'd like to discuss conducting further site investigations prior to construction to meet the needs of this requirement if possible. Thank you, Kevin Long LUj lit of Project Manager a f North Olympic Salmon Coalition � -- ro ectmana er @ nosc.or (360)379-8051 g From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholmaco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:51 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin: Below are the conditions that I have identified so far. They are subject to change by DCD staff as I prepare for the hearing, by the Hearing Examiner, or by Washington Department of Ecology. Potential conditions of approval for the shoreline permit: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 3.Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4.The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6.The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7.Any damage to the proposed structure shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of the structure, the stairs will be removed as soon as practicable. 8.The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9.The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. Temporary erosion control measures shall be in place prior to construction, and BMPs such as silt fencing or hay bales shall be used to prevent erosion. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the water line replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of a an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the 5 volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecv/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to re-locate an existing waterline. It does not include review or approval for any additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. L+ " STEM From: Kevin Long Finailto:proiectmanagera(�nosc.orq] Sent:Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:14 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Permit conditions HI Donna, We are pulling together our specifications for the waterline construction project. I am wondering if there are any conditions you plan to put on the project that we should make our contractors aware of in the specifications. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanagera,nosc.orq (360)379-8051 6 Donna Frostholm From: J. Pelesky U.pelesky @mchlawoffices.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:17 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Jefferson County hearing February 2, 2014 - MLA13-00088 LUG it ENV We got it, thanks very much! Q Je-nivyJ• Pele4loy Legal Assistant to Stephen K.Causseaux,Jr. Hearing Examiner 902 South loth Street Tacoma,Washington 98405 (253)272-2206 i.pelesky@ mchlawoffices.com From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:55 AM To:j.pelesky @mchlawoffices.com Subject: Jefferson County hearing February 2, 2014 - MLA13-00088 Hi Jenny: You should be receiving a box for Mr. Causseaux today that has a copy of the case file for the hearing in Jefferson County on February 25, 2014. It was sent on Friday by U.S. Postal Service. Please let me know if you do not get it so I can try to track it down. Thanks, Daym.a/Frostkolmv Associate Tanner/Wet CandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port'To'wnsend, Washington 98368 dfrostfuthn@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm LOG ITEM Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:03 AM To: 'Kevin Long' Subject: staff report for hearing feb 25, 2014 Attachments: staff report nosc feb 14.doc Kevin: Attached is the staff report that went to the hearing examiner. Please bring a copy with you to the hearing. Donna/Frost-holm/Li .Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port 7"otivnsenc‘'Washington 98368 dfrostham@cofefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 050N coG JEFFERSON COUNTY ti DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelopment NO;c°� Tel:360.379.44501 Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcdico.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center LUG ITEM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION STAFF REPORT s. TO ► ..... O JEFFERSON COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: Shoreline Substantial Development ) PROPOSED FINDINGS, for a Conditional Use and a ) CONCLUSIONS,AND Secondary Use Application ) RECOMMENDATIONS (and a Primary Use Application) File No: MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 Owners: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Real Estate Services Division 600 Capitol Way North Olympia,Washington 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation—Olympic Region 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW,Suite 302 Tumwater,Washington 98501 Jefferson Land Trust 1033 Lawrence Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 Christopher and Susan Calero 7701 8th Avenue NW Seattle,Washington 98117 Agent: North Olympic Salmon Coalition,Kevin Long 205B W Patison Street Port Hadlock,Washington 98339 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND RECOMMENDATION Application: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report,habitat management plan, and a Section 7 consultation report. Staff Comment: This application is being reviewed as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit because it does not meet the shoreline exemption requirements specified in Jefferson County Code (JCC 18.25.090). The shoreline designation for the area south of the railroad grade is Suburban, waterward of the railroad grade (in the south-central LUG iipV1 6 portion of Discovery Bay) is Natural, and waterward of the railroad grade(in the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay) is Conservancy. Restoration work will also occur in the aquatic designation. Restoration of marine habitats in all shoreline designations is an Unclassified Use in the Jefferson County, which requires a shoreline conditional use permit. Installation of utilities is a Secondary Use in the Suburban designation. Secondary Uses and Conditional Uses under the Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC) require a Type III permitting process under JCC 18.40.040 (Table 8-1. Permits—Decisions). Construction of trails (Recreational/Day Use) in areas designated as Suburban is a Primary Use under the Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC) that can be permitted administratively using the Type II process (JCC 18.40.040, Table 8-1. Permits—Decisions). However, an applicant may use the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing processes (JCC 18.40.030(2)) for collectively processing applications that involve two or more procedures. The applicant has decided to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively,rather than individually. Therefore, construction of the trail is addressed in this staff report. Recommendation: Approval with Conditions BACKGROUND INFORMATION Owners: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Transportation, Jefferson Land Trust, and Christopher and Susan Calero. Applicants: North Olympic Salmon Coalition Legal Description and Location: The project area consists of nine parcels near the south end of Discovery Bay, a Washington State Department of Transportation (Highway 101), and the open water of Discovery Bay. The following describes the parcels in the project area. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: • Parcel 902242005 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, TL Tax V(LS SR 101 R/W & TL V-1). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516003 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City,Blk 160,Lot 7. His parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902231004 is legally described as Section 23,Township 29 North,Range 2 West, WM, Gov Lots 1 &2(E of SR 101) less Tax 4 & 26 LS PIN Gov Lot 1 Btwn SR 101 RR R/W (RR R/W Incl). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516903 is legally described as Section 24, Range 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City, Blk 169 Lots 11 & 12 (S of R/W), Blk 170 Lots 1 thru 1, Blk 179 Lot 12. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243046 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 83. This parcel is located within Discovery Bay,just north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20, Port Townsend, Washington. Jefferson Land Trust: • Parcel 902243044 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 68 (Enlg by Tx 76) Subj to Ease Subj to Rest Covt# 521386. This parcel is located within and adjacent to Discovery Bay, and immediately north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243033 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North,Range 2 West, WM, Tax 64, Subj/Rest Covt #521386. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road (and Highway 20), Port Townsend, Washington. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 2 LUG Ait • Parcel 902243020 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 52, Subj/Rest Covt# 521386. This parcel is located east of Discovery Bay and west of Fairmount Road and Highway 20, Port Townsend,Washington. Calero Parcel: • Parcel 902243048 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 82. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road(and Highway 20),Port Townsend, Washington. Site Conditions: The project area consists of Discovery Bay, Salmon Creek, Snow Creek,unnamed streams, a portion of the Highway 101 right of way, and road easements for County roads. Restoration work has previously been permitted and completed at the south end of Discovery Bay (under MLA07-0572), and this proposal is intended to further enhance the bay. Estuary habitats are present along the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay, and artificial ponds occur in the southern portion of the project area. The ponds were created when fill materials were placed in Discovery Bay to construct the railroad tracks that are no longer used. Fill materials were historically put in Discovery Bay, and as part of this fish enhancement project, the bay will be contoured to conditions more suitable for fish and wildlife. A water line within the railroad grade will be relocated to an area immediately adjacent to Discovery Bay. This project moves the water line from Discovery Bay to land adjacent to the Bay. A segment of the Olympic Trail alignment is proposed above the water line. Much of the vegetation in the Highway 101 right of way is weedy, herbaceous species although a few native and non-native trees and shrubs may occur in the right-of-way. Vegetation occurs on the old railroad bed,but most of it is non-native woody and herbaceous species. Shoreline Designation: Pursuant to the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP), the shoreline designations in the project area are Suburban, Natural, Conservancy, and Aquatic. The area landward of the railroad tracks is designated as Suburban, while some areas waterward of the railroad tracks are designated as Conservancy and Natural as well as Aquatic. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan designates the majority of the project area as Rural Residential one dwelling unit per 5 acres (RR 1:5), although portions of parcels adjacent to Highway 101 are designated as Neighborhood/Visitor Crossroad(NC). Site Visit: Jefferson County Development Review Division staff conducted a site visit as part of a pre-application conference(PRE12-00018)on September 6, 2012. Date of Application: A shoreline substantial development application was submitted to Jefferson County on July 1, 2013. The County did not send a written letter of completeness within the 28 days specified in JCC 18.40.110;therefore, the application was deemed complete by DCD on July 29, 2013. It was not until August 28, 2013 that DCD reviewed the application for completeness(Exhibit 11). State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): The proposal is subject to review under SEPA. The SEPA Threshold Determination was issued on January 22,2014. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Proposal Noticing: Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23, 2013 (Exhibits 21 and 23) • Notice of Public Hearing: February 12,2014(Exhibit 55) Notice was posted on the property: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23,2013 (Exhibits 21 and 22) • Notice of Public Hearing: February 12,2014(Exhibits 55 and 56) NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 3 LUG EIVI • The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 22, 2013 (Exhibit 21) • Notice of Public Hearing : February 11, 2014(Exhibit 55) Public Hearing Date: February 25, 2014 PUBLIC COMMENT Adjacent property owners were notified of the shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal (Exhibits 21 and 55). Proposal Noticing: Public Response No written comments were received from the public during notice of application. DCD received a phone call October 13, 2013 from a person who leases space from an old train car on parcel 902231017. This person wanted to confirm that water would still be available to her commercial use under this proposal. As of February 13, 2014,no comments were received by the public during the notice of public hearing. III AGENCY COMMENT Agencies, including tribes, were notified of the pending shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal(Exhibits 21 and 55). As of February 13,2014,no comments were received by agencies during the notice of public hearing. Proposal Noticing: Agency Response SEPA comments were received from Washington State Department of Ecology during the notice of application (Exhibit 28). Comments pertained to general guidance for flooplains management,water quality, and water guidance. In response to the floodplains management comment,the project engineer clarified that no increase in base flood elevation would be expected as a result of this project(Exhibit 34). Jefferson County Environmental Health reviewed the relocation of the waterline and provided conditions of approval, which are included at the end of this staff report. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED • Shoreline Substantial Development Permits (SSDP) for restoration activities, re-location of a water line, and construction of a non-motorized trail. APPLICABLE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES • Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County, adopted March 7, 1989 • Jefferson County Unified Development Code,adopted December 18, 2000,effective January 16,2001 • Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan,adopted August 28, 1998 PROPOSED FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following section constitutes staff findings and conclusions regarding consistency of the application with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the Jefferson County Code, and the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. Following these findings and conclusions are conditions recommended for consideration by the Hearing Examiner. Any NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 4 Liu T P ,f of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations may be adopted,rejected, or modified by the Hearing Examiner based on testimony or evidence presented during the course of review. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is to restore habitat conditions in Discovery Bay for fish and wildlife. The applicant is proposing to p p rY Y pp p p g remove fill from an old railroad bed that crosses the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay, relocate a water line in the old railroad bed to the shorelands between Discovery Bay and adjacent roadways, restore the Snow Creek estuary, and construct a segment of the Olympic Trail system over the water line (Exhibits 6, 13, and 45). Specifically,the proposal includes: • Removing armoring from an abandoned railroad grade (constructed through former tideflats) and restoring more natural beach profile; • Restoring tidal circulation to an enclosed,artificially-created freshwater pond/wetland(Cherry Pond); • Removing fill from the mouths of four small streams that flow into the project area; • Removing a creosote timber railroad bridge(trestle); • Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegates located between a lagoon and a pond(mill pond); • Removing 1,700 feet of railroad grade and three associated railroad trestle bridges near Snow and Salmon Creeks; • Removing sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek; • Disposing spoils onsite at upland locations; • Re-locating a waterline that was located within the railroad grade into WSDOT and local road rights-of- way; • Using directional drilling beneath Snow and Salmon Creek for installation of the re-located waterline; • Extending a culvert to a non-fish bearing stream at Highway 101; • Constructing a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the waterline alignment; • Constructing rock walls, reinforced slopes, and a soldier pile wall to support the trail prism (and minimize the ecological impacts of the trail);and • Bridging two fish-bearing stream mouths with box culverts at WSDOT culverts. 2. The proposed development is within shoreline jurisdiction, and is subject to the critical areas regulations specified in the Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.22 JCC). The following critical areas were identified on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat areas (habitat for listed species; Type S, F, and N streams); wetlands; geologically hazardous areas (seismic hazards); frequently flooded areas; aquifer recharge area(susceptible); and seawater intrusion protection zones(high risk and coastal). Staff Comment: The application is for a mostly self-mitigating project. The applicant submitted a wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation report( Exhibit 6). These reports show that the amount of restoration work more than compensates for the temporary construction-related impacts and the stabilizing of the trail prism. Jefferson County noticed the application to state agencies, tribes, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but did not receive any comments indicating critical areas would be adversely affected by the project. In addition, the application is being reviewed by federal agencies for federal permits, which are reviewed for potential adverse effects of the project on listed species. Based on the reviews of this application, it is assumed that listed fish and wildlife species would not be adversely affected by the proposal. The project engineer prepared a report to address construction of the waterline and Olympic Discovery Trail within a geologically hazardous area (Exhibit 6). This report provides recommendations for construction, which have been incorporated into the project design plans. A recommended condition in this staff report includes the requirement to adhere to all design recommendations specified in the geotechnical report. The project area is mapped on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map and must comply with the FEMA Biological Opinion (BiOp). To ensure compliance with the BiOp, a recommended condition of approval is included in this staff report that requires the applicant to obtain a permit from the U.S.Army Corps of NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLAl3-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 5 LOG ITpV1 6- Pagek_4_0L4 Engineers prior to beginning any work on the project (a federal permit ensures compliance with the Endangered Species Act). The proposed project occurs within a susceptible aquifer recharge area and within a high risk and a coastal seawater intrusion protection zone(SIPZ). The type of project proposed,however,would not be expected to adversely affect the aquifer recharge area or the SIPZ. 3. Pursuant to JCC 18.30.070 (Stormwater Management Standards), the proposed development must comply with the minimum standards of the 2012 Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Based on the Jefferson County Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that was submitted,the proposal is a large project that must comply with all Minimum Requirements in the stormwater manual. The plans have been prepared by an engineer and are assumed to comply with the stormwater manual. 4. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: The proposed shoreline development is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The following Plan goals and policies apply to the proposal: a) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Goal 5.0(p. 8-24)states: "Allow development along shorelines which is compatible with the protection of natural processes, natural conditions, and natural functions of the shore environment. " Staff Comment: The proposed development has undergone review under the Jefferson County Code, including the shoreline regulations (Chapter 18.25 JCC). As conditioned through existing Jefferson County regulations, the proposal is consistent with this policy. Also, this application is intended to restore natural shoreline processes, conditions,and functions. b) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Policy 5.1 (p. 8-24)states: "Regulate shoreline land use activities based on the best available scientific information." Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to resource agencies and tribes for review and comments. c) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Policy 5.2(p.8-24) states: "Protect nearby properties and the shoreline environment from the individual or cumulative effects of development that may interfere with the functions of sediment transport systems along the shoreline. " Staff Comment: The application is intended to restore natural processes and was sent to agencies and tribes for comment;therefore, it is not expected to interfere with sediment transport functions. d) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environmental Policy 5.6(p.8-24): "Manage shoreline hazard areas such as unstable bluffs and erosion and coastal flood hazard areas to protect public safety and public and private property." Staff Comment: A licensed engineer prepared a geotechnical report and the design plan sheets (Exhibits 6 and 13); therefore, it is assumed that the proposal will not adversely affect public safety or private property. A recommended condition in this staff report includes a requirement to construct the project per the approved plan sheets and to adhere to the recommendations in the geotechnical report. Finally, the permit will be conditioned to require a building permit,which also involves a review for public safety. e) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environmental Policy 5.7(p.8-24): "Manage storm water for proposed and existing development in a manner consistent with Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. " Staff Comment: The proposal was designed by an engineer and is assumed to comply with the stormwater manual. 5. Jefferson County Code: The Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.40 JCC) requires that one Public Hearing be held for each proposed project. Staff Comment: The scheduled public hearing constitutes the single hearing for this project. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 6 LUG ITE f fj7 6. Shoreline Master Program: The proposal is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program(SMP). The proposed project would be constructed within the following shoreline designations: Conservancy,Natural, Suburban, and Aquatic. Staff Comment: The SMP applies to this proposal, which is subject to all applicable shoreline program policies and performance standards. The following sections of the SMP are specifically applicable to the proposal; additional policies and performance standards may apply: JCC 18.25.110 Aquatic(open water; restoration) JCC 18.25.120 Natural(southern end of Discovery Bay,north of railroad tracks;restoration) JCC 18.25.130 Conservancy(southeast portion of Discovery Bay,north of railroad tracks; restoration) JCC 18.25.140 Suburban(south of railroad tracks;restoration,waterline,trail) JCC 18.25.180 Primary Uses(recreation/day use in suburban designation) JCC 18.25.190 Secondary Uses(waterline installation in suburban designation) JCC 18.25.200 Conditional Uses(restoration in all shoreline designations) JCC 18.25.220 Unclassified Uses(restoration in all shoreline designations) JCC 18.25.400 Recreational Facilities(trail construction) JCC 18.25.450 Utilities(waterline installation) 7. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(1)defines areas in the Aquatic designation as: All water bodies, including marine waters, lakes, rivers, and streams, and their respective water columns and underlying lands that are defined as shorelines of the state. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: (a) The aquatic environment should be managed for appropriate use activities, allowing either multiple use or single dominant use in areas of unique conditions, while recognizing and ensuring compatibility with adjacent upland shoreline designations. Staff Comment: A primary use of Discovery Bay is fish and wildlife habitat, which will be restored as part of this project. Removal of the old railroad bed and the waterline from the aquatic designation will improve views (and water enjoyment) of the bay from the adjacent parcels while improving habitat conditions. Creation of channels in the Snow Creek estuary will improve the resource value for fisheries. Work on this proposal within the aquatic designation does not affect adjacent upland shoreline designation(Suburban). (b) Abandoned structures within the aquatic designation should be removed when they no longer serve their permitted use unless retaining such structures will provide a net environmental benefit,for example, artificial reef effect of concrete anchors. Staff Comment: Existing structures within the bay that are not an environmental benefit will be removed as part of this project. Any structures installed as part of this project(such as culverts)will stay in place until they need to be repaired in the future. A recommended condition of approval has been added to this staff report to address this requirement. (c) All structures placed on the water's surface should have as low a profile as possible to minimize visual intrusion. Staff Comment: Any structures (such as culverts)will be low on the surface of the water. No visual intrusion is expected as a result of this project. (d) Potential conflicts with adjacent uses such as commercial fishing, recreation, and navigation should be considered in the review of proposed aquatic developments. Development should not be permitted where they would materially interfere with existing uses. Staff Comment: The proposal would not adversely affect commercial fishing, recreation, and navigation, or materially interfere with existing uses. (e) Aquatic developments should not locate in areas where the ecological quality of the shoreline environment would be degraded. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 7 I-0li !T 4 it Staff Comment: The focus of this application is enhancement of shoreline habitats. Jefferson County noticed the application to Washington Departments of Ecology, Natural Resources, and Fish and Wildlife as well as the Tribes. DCD did not receive any comments indicating concern for the shoreline environment. Therefore, the proposal would not be expected to negatively affect the ecological quality of the shoreline environment. An HPA is required from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the project. The HPA will stipulate construction windows and design requirements to minimize the potential for adverse impacts to existing aquatic life and habitat conditions in the bay. This shoreline permit would be conditioned to comply with requirements of the HPA. By meeting the HPA requirements, the potential for degradation of the shoreline environment will be reduced. In addition, this proposal has been reviewed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which includes an assessment of the proposal on federally-listed species. () Aquatic developments should be designed and located to ensure that they do not have a significant adverse impact on natural dynamic processes of shoreline formation or change. Staff Comment: The proposal is intended to restore some natural processes to Discovery Bay. As such, the proposed project is not expected to adversely impact any natural processes occurring along the shoreline. (g) Aquatic developments should make minimal and appropriate use of approved pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, vaccines, growth stimulants, or other chemicals. Operators shall receive prior review and approval for their use from the appropriate federal and state agencies. Staff Comment: Not applicable to this project. (h) Only federal and state approved antifouling agents should be used in aquatic developments. Staff Comment: Not applicable to this project. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(3)contains the following performance standards: (a) Structures, equipment, and materials shall be removed as soon as practicable upon the cessation of a project's operation or a structure's useful life. Any structure that is damaged or breaks away in the water shall be repaired or removed by the permittee as soon as practicable. Permittees who anticipate a temporary interruption of the use of a facility or structure may be allowed to keep it in its permitted location provided they notify and receive written concurrence from the Jefferson County planning and building department. Any structure not utilized for over one year shall be removed regardless of future anticipated use unless prior permission has been granted by the Jefferson County planning and building department upon showing of good cause. Staff Comment: This has been addressed through the recommended conditions of approval. (b) Permittees for developments in the aquatic designation shall be required to post a performance bond or other suitable guarantee to ensure removal of all structures, equipment, and materials, should the project cease operation. The county may require security beyond that required by the state if it is determined that state requirements are not adequate to secure removal of structures. Staff Comment: Bonds would be appropriate to ensure the removal of overwater commercial or industrial structures, where the use may be discontinued and the facilities may have structures that would entail significant cost for their removal. Since the proposal is for restoration of Discovery Bay, no structures would need to be removed. For this reason,no bond has been recommended. (c) Permittees shall be liable for all damages to public and private property should their structures fail. The county may require liability insurance beyond that required by the state if it is determined that state requirements are not adequate to cover damages. Staff Comment: This applicant has submitted engineered stamped plans for the restoration work and no damages are anticipated in the aquatic designation. A building permit will be required for slope stabilization work for portions of the waterline and the County will review the plans to ensure that this work would be constructed to the required building standards. The County did not receive any comments from WSDOT and it is assumed that there are no state concerns about slope stabilization within the Highway 101 right-of-way. Therefore, the potential for liability issues are relatively low and no liability insurance has been recommended. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 8 LOG ITEM (d) Aquatic developments shall not be approved in narrow channels, shipping lanes, or in other areas where they are a significant hazard to navigation. Staff Comment: The proposed structure would not be located in a narrow channel or a shipping lane. Based on the proposed location, it is not expected to be a navigational hazard. (e) All structures that could interfere with navigation shall be marked in accordance with the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. Staff Comment: Since most of the work to be conducted in the aquatic designation is restoration of Discovery Bay, no navigational interference is expected. However, to ensure compliance, a recommended condition is included at the end of this staff report that would require the applicant to comply with any requirements established by the U.S. Coast Guard, as it pertains to marking for navigational purposes. (fi The maximum level for noise generated in the aquatic designation shall be 50 dBA at a distance of 100 feet. This standard shall not apply to vessels that are underway. All feasible methods shall be employed to minimize overwater noise generation. Staff Comment: The project involves restoration of Discovery Bay, re-location of a waterline, and construction of a non-motorized trail system. The project is not expected to generate noise. (g) Structures placed in the aquatic designation shall blend into the surroundings to the greatest extent feasible utilizing appropriate color(s), texture, nonreflective materials, and other design characteristics. Staff Comment: The proposal does not include structures that would not blend into the surroundings. 8. Master Program JCC 18.25.120(1)defines areas in the Natural designation as: A shoreline possessing unique or fragile features either natural or cultural, that are essentially unaltered from their natural state or relatively intolerant of human use other than that for passive activities. Included are those containing hazardous or unique environmental conditions, such as highly erosive bluffs, tidal marshes, estuaries, and active landslides. Master Program JCC 18.25.120(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: (a) Aquaculture developments and mechanized harvest practices involving substantial substrate modification through dredging, trenching, digging, or adverse sedimentation should be prohibited in wetlands and estuaries which are natural environmental designations in this master program. Staff Comment: Aquaculture is not proposed in the estuary. Any dredging that would occur as part of the restoration effort in the estuary is intended to re-create channels and re-establish habitats within the estuary. 9. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(1)defines areas in the Conservancy designation as: An area with valuable natural, cultural, or historical resources or environmental conditions that should be protected, conserved, and managed to the extent that a continual supply of those resources such as soil, water, timber,fish, shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted but are maintained. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: To protect, conserve, and manage existing resources and valuable historical and cultural areas in order to ensure sustained resource stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions are not subject to inappropriate uses. Staff Comment: The criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are found in WAC 173-27-150, which requires that the proposed development be consistent with: RCW 90.58 Shoreline Management Act; WAC 173-27 Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Provisions; and the local shoreline management master program. The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the Shoreline Conditional Use permit. As conditioned through the Shoreline Conditional Use and review under the UDC, the proposed project complies with this policy. 10. Master Program JCC 18.25.140(1)defines areas in the Suburban designation as: NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 9 Uki ITEM / Of /:Z Areas where residential activity may approach urban density, but usually where densities permit space for small numbers of livestock, gardens, or wood lots. These areas are served by individual or community water supplies, but generally are not linked with utilities from an urban center. Commercial activities to serve the needs of the immediate area are considered an integral part of this designation. Master Program JCC 18.25.140(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: To provide permanent residential and recreation areas outside of urban areas, so long as development of these areas provides adequate facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, open space, and the like without severe degradation to the lifestyle that was sought initially. Staff Comment: The criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are found in WAC 173-27-150, which requires the proposed development to be consistent with: RCW 90.58 Shoreline Management Act; WAC 173-27 Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Provisions; and the local shoreline management master program. The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the Shoreline Secondary and Conditional Use permit. As conditioned,the proposed project complies with this policy. 11. Master Program JCC 18.25.180(1)defines areas in the Primary uses as: In general, those categories of uses that are deemed as being preferable with the definition and policy of a particular shoreline destination. Staff Comment: Primary uses are permitted administratively. The applicant has decided to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively, rather than separately, as allowed under JCC 18.40.030(2). For this reason, the Primary use portion of this proposal is included in this staff report. Master Program JCC 18.25.180(2)contains criteria applying to areas so designated: Primary uses are presumed to be generally consistent with the policies and definition of the shoreline designation where it is located. Projects will be reviewed for consistency with specific goals and policies and must comply with the performance standards specified for the particular type of development being reviewed. Staff Comment: The proposal has been reviewed against all relevant shoreline requirements. 12. Master Program JCC 18.25.190(1)defines Secondary Uses as: Those uses that are not automatically deemed as being preferable within the scope of the definition or policy of a particular shoreline environmental designation. Master program JCC 18.25.190(2)contains criteria that states: Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for secondary uses will have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: (a) The proposal will not be contrary to the general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, nor shall it be contrary to the goals,policies, and performance standards of this master program. Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to state agencies, including Washington Department of Ecology, for review and comment. As conditioned, the proposal meets the applicable policies and performance standards of the Shoreline Master Program and is consistent with the SMA. (b) The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. Staff Comment: The proposal will not materially interfere with the public use of public land nor will it interfere with private use of private lands. (c) The proposed project will not cause unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or other properties and will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. Staff Comment: The proposal is to restore the environment and this will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 10 LUG )TE pags 13. Master Program JCC 18.25.200(1)defines Conditional Uses as: Those uses that are deemed least preferable within the scope of the definition and policies of a particular shoreline environmental designation. While not prohibited outright, these uses are an exception to the general rule. A conditional use permit is intended to allow for flexibility and the exercise of judgment in the application of regulation in a manner consistent with the policies of the Act and this master program. Staff Comment: Since Jefferson County does not have policies and performance standards specific to restoration, in the current shoreline master program, much of this proposal is considered an unclassified use that triggers review as a conditional use. While many conditional use applications meet the definition of`least preferable', this application is preferable as it is intended to improve shoreline habitat conditions and processes and it does not negatively affect adjacent land uses. Master Program JCC 18.25.200(2)contains criteria that states: Applicants for shoreline conditional use permits shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that they are in conformance with WAC 173-27-160, as amended, and all of the following: (a) The proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the p p p f e policies of the master program. Staff Comment: The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the application for a Shoreline Conditional Use permit. As conditioned,the proposed project complies with these policies. (b) The proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of the public shorelines. Staff Comment: The restoration work and the relocation of the waterline will not result in interference of the ability of the public to use the shoreline and the segment of the Olympic Discovery trail. These areas will be enhanced for public use of the shoreline. (c) The proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other permitted uses within the area. Staff Comment: The proposal is not inconsistent with other permitted uses and provides some enhancement of existing uses in the area. As conditioned,the proposal is compatible with other permitted uses within the area. (d) The proposed use will cause no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. Staff Comment: The proposed project is to enhance the existing shoreline environment. Jefferson County did not receive comments from state agencies or tribes during the notice of application that would indicate the potential for adverse effects as a result of approving this project. As a staff recommended condition of approval, the proposal would be conditioned to comply with HPA requirements and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit conditions, which are intended to minimize the potential for adverse affects occurring due to construction. Therefore, no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline are expected. (e) The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. In those limited instances where a conditional use is proposed, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for similar action in the area. Staff Comment: No detrimental effects or cumulative impacts are likely to occur as a result of implementing this proposal. 14. Master Program JCC 18.25.220 contains criteria that states: Unclassified uses are those uses which are not classified in any other definitions or uses in Chapter 18.25 of the JCC. Such uses shall be reviewed as a conditional use including the applicant's additional burden to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances preclude reasonable use of the property consistent with the provisions of the master program. Staff Comment: Shoreline restoration is considered an unclassified use under Chapter 18.25 JCC. 15. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(1)defines recreational facilities as: NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 11 LOG ITEM I3 4 Facilities such as parks, trails and pathways, campgrounds, and resorts that provide a means for relaxation, play, and amusement. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(2)contains prohibited uses and activities as follows: (a) Overnight recreational spaces or sites located on beaches, dunes, or intertidal areas. Staff Comment: Overnight recreation is not included in this proposal. A recommended condition of approval at the end of this staff report would prohibit overnight recreational uses within the project area. Master Program JCC 18.23.400(3)contains policies relevant to recreational facilities, as follows: (a) The concept of upland camping should be encouraged to prevent the concentration of clutter and leave the beaches, tidelands, streams, and their associated shorelines in basically their natural state. Staff Comment: Camping is not proposed. (b) Park design and operation should deal with the impact such activities have not only within park boundaries, but on adjacent properties and communities as well. Staff Comment: The segment of trail proposed is part of a larger trail system that will provide recreational opportunities and views of the restored shoreline environment. Adjacent property owners were noticed and three signs were posted in the project area. No comments were received from property owners in the area; therefore, it is assumed that the trail will not impact adjacent properties. (c) Recreational facilities should make adequate provisions for: (i) Traffic, both inside and outside the facility; (ii) Proper water and sewage disposal methods; (iii) Security and fire protection; (iv) The prevention of overflow and trespass onto adjacent properties. Staff Comment: The segment of trail will not result in traffic, does not require potable water or septic system, and will not require additional security or fire protection. Much of the trail is on public land and adjacent parcels have commercial uses that could benefit from public access from the trail. (d) Public access to public shorelines and surface waters should be encouraged Staff Comment The project will provide views of the shoreline to the public but is not designed to encourage the public into the restoration areas. (e) Offshore recreational devices should not interfere with navigation of waterways. Staff Comment: Offshore recreational devices are not proposed. (f) Trails and pathways on steep shoreline bluffs should be designed to not adversely affect bank stability. Staff Comment: The trail would not be located on a steep shoreline bluff. (g) Public recreational developments should be consistent with adopted park, recreational, and open space plans of the county, when appropriate. Staff Comment: This is not applicable to the proposal. (h) Swim rafts used for moorage purposes should comply with the policies and performance standards for offshore moorage devices. Staff Comment: Swim rafts and moorages are not proposed. (i) Stairways, landings, and boathouses should not be located waterward of existing bulkheads, banks, or the ordinary high water mark. Staff Comment: No stairs, landings, or boathouses are proposed. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(4)contains performance standards for recreational facilities, as follows: (a) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for water supply, sewage disposal, and garbage collection. Staff Comment: Water supply, sewage disposal, and garbage collection are not required for construction of the trail. (b) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for vehicular parking. Staff Comment: The trail segment is for non-motorized uses and is not associated with a parking lot or a trail head. It is possible that people who visit the commercial buildings in the vicinity of the project area could access NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 12 OG ITEM the trail for such recreational activities as walking, biking, or bird watching. Additional parking spaces are not required for this segment of trail. (c) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for enforcement of laws and regulations associated with use of the facilities being proposed. Staff Comment: The segment of trail is not expected to attract a large group of people; most will be walking the trail, biking along the trail, or observing wildlife from an adjacent business. No additional enforcement would be needed for these types of activities. (d) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions such as screening, buffer strips,fences, and signs to prevent park overflow and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private or public properties. Staff Comment: A park is not proposed. The trail is not likely to attract sufficient numbers of people to affect adjacent property owners. Replanting is proposed and this will provide some screening over time as the plants grow. (e) Recreational facilities shall establish and enforce regulations that prohibit tree cutting and limit the taking of marine life, driftwood, and the like. Staff Comment: The shoreline is being proposed for restoration and is not expected to have habitat and wildlife that would be collected immediately upon completion of the project. Much of the project area is owned by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and no future tree removal is expected. Signs associated with recreational facilities shall be kept to a minimum in number and size and shall be (� 8n f P erected as informational or directional aids only. Staff Comment: No recreational signs are proposed at this time. However, a condition of approval has been included should the plans change prior to building permitting for the trail. (g) Adequate provisions shall be made for the control of fires both within recreational facilities and between recreation al facilities and adjacent private or public lands. Staff Comment: The proposal does not include facilities for fire. (h) Unless specifically designed for that purpose,park and recreational facilities shall prohibit the off-road use of all terrain vehicles in order to protect natural features as well as the enjoyment and value of adjacent private and public properties. Staff Comment: The trail is not intended for use by all terrain vehicles. (i) Applicants for substantial development permits for recreational facilities may be required to provide adequate information to demonstrate the safety of proposed equipment and facilities. Staff Comment: The trail has been engineered and a building permit is required for any slope stabilization over four feet in height. A geotechnical report was prepared that addresses seismic hazards in the property area. The applicant has submitted information to show the trail would be safe. (j) Overnight recreational facilities shall comply with all applicable regulations and guidelines, including JCC 18.25.300. Staff Comment: Overnight facilities are not included in the proposal. 16. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(1)defines utilities as: Services or facilities that produce, transit, carry, store,process, or dispose of electric power, gas, water, sewage, communications, oil, and the like. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(2)contains policies specific to utilities, as follows: (a) Whenever utilities must be placed in a shoreline area, the location should be chosen to not obstruct or destroy scenic views. Whenever feasible, these facilities should be placed underground or designed to do minimal damage to the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline area. Staff Comment: The waterline will be installed below ground. Views will not be adversely affected by this proposal. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 13 LO-4 i E (b) To an extent feasible, Jefferson County should incorporate major utility corridors on shorelines into their programs and plans for public access to and along waterbodies. Staff Comment: This application includes public access to shoreline views by installing the trail over the waterline. (c) Utilities should be located to meet the needs of future populations in areas planned to accommodate this growth. Staff Comment: The waterline is being relocated as a result of restoration work in Discovery Bay. The location and the size of the pipe are sufficient to meet future water needs (assuming additional water rights are obtained from the state). To comply with water supply requirements in JCC 18.30.030, this application was reviewed by Jefferson County Environmental Health (Exhibits 34, 42, 44, 50, and 52). This department provided conditions of approval of approval that are included in this staff report. (d) Upon completion of installation and maintenance projects of shorelines, banks should be restored to preproject configuration, replanted with native species, and be provided with maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established. Staff Comment The proposal includes replanting with native species. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(3)contains performance standards that pertain to the project, as follows: (a) Utilities shall be installed adjacent to or within existing utility or circulation easements or rights-of-way whenever feasible. Staff Comment The waterline will be installed within the road and highway rights-of-way. (b) Utilities shall be installed underground whenever feasible. Staff Comment: The waterline will be installed underground. (c) Utilities shall be designed and installed to meet future needs when possible. Staff Comment: This waterline has been designed and will be installed to meet future needs, assuming state water rights can be obtained. (d) When feasible, utility corridors shall serve multiple uses such as shoreline access or recreational trails or pathways. Staff Comment: A segment of the Olympic Discovery trail will be constructed over the waterline corridor. (e) Utilities installed in the water, beach, or upon tidal areas shall assure that water quality and marine life will not suffer degradation. Staff Comment: The project is part of a restoration effort in Discovery Bay, and no degradation is expected as a result of installing the waterline. The application was noticed to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and no comments were received. (I) Installation of utilities shall assure the prevention of siltation or beach erosion. Staff Comment: The proposal has been engineered and installation of utilities is not expected to result in siltation or beach erosion. (g) Upon completion of installation or maintenance projects, banks shall be restored to a suitable configuration and stability, replanted with native species, and provided with maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established. Staff Comment: The applicant is proposing to replant disturbed areas with native vegetation(Exhibit 39). (h) Utility discharges and outfalls shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated so degradation to water quality, marine life, and general shoreline ecosystems is kept to an absolute minimum. Staff Comment: No discharges or outfalls are proposed. This application is intended to enhance Discovery Bay for fish and wildlife so no degradation from installation of the waterline is expected. (i) Both during and after installation, utilities shall assure that geohydraulic shore processes and marine life are basically maintained in their natural condition. Staff Comment: The waterline would be installed above ordinary high water mark in relatively degraded habitats adjacent to Highway 101 and County roads. With replanting and adjacent restoration efforts, natural conditions should be maintained. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 14 LOU LIM 0) Utilities located in floodprone areas shall be provided with adequate flood protection and shall not be installed to increase flood hazard or other damage to life or property. Staff Comment: Recommended conditions of approval at this end of this staff report address this requirement (k) Flammable or toxic materials shall not be stored in areas subject to flooding. Staff Comment: No flammable or toxic materials have been proposed as part of this project (Z) Utilities shall not be installed in areas subject geological hazards, unless it can clearly be demonstrated that such hazards can be overcome. Staff Comment: An existing waterline is being relocated from Discovery Bay (railroad fill) to an upland area along the south end of Discovery Bay that is mapped as a seismic hazard. A geotechnical report was prepared as part of this project. Based on this report,the waterline would be installed to applicable current safety standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, staff recommends Approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development application. Staff found the proposal to be consistent with the applicable Code requirements and that the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit should be granted subject to the following conditions. Staff Conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed(with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures,they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the water line replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one(1)year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 15 LOG iTEIVI 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System #07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. Dated February 13,2014 Prepared by Donna Frostholm,Associate Planner and project planner for this application to Jefferson County Department of Community Development. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 16 Memo Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 (360) 379-4450 FAX (360) 379-4451 • llird*Tre TO . Of / FROM DATE ;;,,- COMMENTS / •"' r / V VV VV ?' ! „s V 1 • ta. -1 , . 4 • NOSC Discovery Bay Restoration, Waterline Relocation, and Olympic Discovery Trail Application EXHIBIT LIST Item No Item/description Date Type 50 Communication with JC EH regarding permit condition 1/28/2014 G 51 Email communications from/to applicant 1/30/2014 G 52 Communication with JC EH regarding permit condition 2/3/2014 G 53 Email communications from/to applicant 2/5/2014 G 54 Email communications from/to applicant 2/5/2014 G 55 Notice of public hearing 2/11/2014 N 56 Affidavit of posting - notice of public hearing 2/11/2014 N 57 Phone log varies-to 2/11/2014 G 58 Staff Report 2/13/2014 R Key to Types A=Application L=Maps C=Comments N=Notices G=General R=Reports S=SEPA H:\exhibit list nosc 022514 2 of 2 NOSC Discovery Bay Restoration, Waterline Relocation, and Olympic Discovery Trail Application EXHIBIT LIST Item No: Item/description Date Type 1 Pre-application meeting materials varies-to 9/6/2012 A 2 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 3/13/2013 G 3 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 3/14/2013 G 4 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 3/18/2013 G 5 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 7/1/2013 G 6 Shoreline application submittal 7/1/2013 A 7 Email communications from/to applicant 7/11/2013 G 8 County property owners(assessors office) by parcel 7/30/2013 G 9 County cases, conditions, permissions by parcel 7/30/2013 G 10 DCD/PW phone communications regarding proposed trail 8/14/2013 G li 11 Letter-determination of complete application 8/28/2013 G 12 DCD email to applicant-request for additional information 8/28/2013 G 13 Project drawings (restoration, waterline, trail) 9/4/2013 A 14 Phone communication with applicant regarding submittal 9/4/2013 G 15 DCD/PW meeting notes to discuss trail portion of project 9/10/2013 G 16 DCD email to applicant-request for additional information 9/12/2013 G 17 Trail site plan 9/12/2013 A 18 Email communications from/to applicant 9/16/2013 G 19 DCD email communications to/from applicant regarding noticing 10/16/2013 N 20 County property owners(assessor's office) by parcel 10/17/2013 G 21 Notice of application 10/22/2013 G 22 Affidavit of posting - notice of application 10/23/2013 N, S 23 Affidavit of publication - notice of application 11/26/2013 N, S 24 Returned notice-adjacent property owner 10/24/2013 N 25 Returned notice-adjacent property owner 11/4/2013 N 26 Email communications from/to applicant 11/1/2013 G 27 Pre-application meeting follow up emails from/to applicant 11/16/2012 G 28 Department of Ecology comments 11/21/2013 C 29 DCD email to applicant- noticing 10/22/2013 N, S 30 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/2013 G 31 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/2013 G 32 Email communications from/to applicant 11/26/2013 G 33 Email communications from/to applicant 12/5/2013 G 34 Applicant responses to JC Environmental Health questions (walk in) 12/5/2013 A 35 Applicant responses to JC Environmental Health questions (email) 12/5/2013 A 36 44 CFR, Section 60.3 (FEMA flooding) 12/12/2013 G 37 DCD mapping of parcels in project area 12/12/2013 G 38 Letter-determination of complete application (reprinted) 12/16/2013 G 39 Email communications from/to applicant 10/17/2013 A 40 Email communications from/to applicant 12/17/2013 G 41 Email communications from/to applicant 12/27/2013 G 42 DCD email communications to/from JC Environmental Health 12/31/2013 G 43 Email communications from/to applicant 1/2/2014 G 44 DCD email communications to/from JC Environmental Health 1/15/2014 C 45 Email communication from JC PW- updated trail sheet 1/16/2014 A 46 Meeting notes (meeting with applicant and JC PW) 1/16/2014 G 47 SEPA DNS 1/22/2014 S 48 SEPA determination received by state agencies 1/22/2014 S 49 Communication with JC DCD/Building Division 1/28/2014 G Key to Types A=Application L=Maps C=Comments N=Notices G=General R=Reports S=SEPA H:\exhibit list nosc 022514 1 of 2 44'4soN coG JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 1 Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelopment 9sN 3 Tel:360.379.4450 1 Fax:360.379.4451 !Email:dcdtilco.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center LOG ITEM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION STAFF O REPORT Page / JEFFERSON COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER �f / RE: Shoreline Substantial Development ) PROPOSED FINDINGS, for a Conditional Use and a ) CONCLUSIONS,AND Secondary Use Application ) RECOMMENDATIONS (and a Primary Use Application) File No: MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 Owners: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Real Estate Services Division 600 Capitol Way North Olympia,Washington 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation—Olympic Region 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW,Suite 302 Tumwater,Washington 98501 Jefferson Land Trust 1033 Lawrence Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 Christopher and Susan Calero 7701 8th Avenue NW Seattle,Washington 98117 Agent: North Olympic Salmon Coalition,Kevin Long 205B W Patison Street Port Hadlock,Washington 98339 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND RECOMMENDATION Application: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report,habitat management plan, and a Section 7 consultation report. Staff Comment: This application is being reviewed as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit because it does not meet the shoreline exemption requirements specified in Jefferson County Code (JCC 18.25.090). The shoreline designation for the area south of the railroad grade is Suburban, waterward of the railroad grade (in the south-central LOO EMVM Page 02 of �p portion of Discovery Bay) is Natural, and waterward of the railroad grade(in the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay) is Conservancy. Restoration work will also occur in the aquatic designation. Restoration of marine habitats in all shoreline designations is an Unclassified Use in the Jefferson County, which requires a shoreline conditional use permit. Installation of utilities is a Secondary Use in the Suburban designation. Secondary Uses and Conditional Uses under the Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC) require a Type III permitting process under JCC 18.40.040 (Table 8-1. Permits—Decisions). Construction of trails (Recreational/Day Use) in areas designated as Suburban is a Primary Use under the Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC) that can be permitted administratively using the Type II process (JCC 18.40.040, Table 8-1. Permits—Decisions). However, an applicant may use the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing processes (JCC 18.40.030(2)) for collectively processing applications that involve two or more procedures. The applicant has decided to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively, rather than individually. Therefore, construction of the trail is addressed in this staff report. Recommendation: Approval with Conditions BACKGROUND INFORMATION Owners: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Transportation, Jefferson Land Trust, and Christopher and Susan Calero. Applicants: North Olympic Salmon Coalition Legal Description and Location: The project area consists of nine parcels near the south end of Discovery Bay, a Washington State Department of Transportation (Highway 101), and the open water of Discovery Bay. The following describes the parcels in the project area. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: • Parcel 902242005 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, TL Tax V(LS SR 101 R/W & TL V-1). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516003 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City,Blk 160,Lot 7. His parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902231004 is legally described as Section 23,Township 29 North,Range 2 West, WM, Gov Lots 1 &2(E of SR 101) less Tax 4 & 26 LS PTN Gov Lot 1 Btwn SR 101 RR R/W (RR R/W Incl). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516903 is legally described as Section 24, Range 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City, Blk 169 Lots 11 & 12 (S of R/W), Blk 170 Lots 1 thru 1, Blk 179 Lot 12. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243046 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 83. This parcel is located within Discovery Bay,just north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20, Port Townsend, Washington. Jefferson Land Trust: • Parcel 902243044 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 68 (Enlg by Tx 76) Subj to Ease Subj to Rest Covt# 521386. This parcel is located within and adjacent to Discovery Bay, and immediately north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243033 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North,Range 2 West, WM, Tax 64, Subj/Rest Covt #521386. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road (and Highway 20), Port Townsend, Washington. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 2 LOG ITEM #_ Page 3 of • Parcel 902243020 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North,Range 2 West, WM, Tax 52, Subj/Rest Covt# 521386. This parcel is located east of Discovery Bay and west of Fairmount Road and Highway 20, Port Townsend, Washington. Calero Parcel: • Parcel 902243048 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 82. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road(and Highway 20),Port Townsend,Washington. Site Conditions: The project area consists of Discovery Bay, Salmon Creek, Snow Creek,unnamed streams, a portion of the Highway 101 right of way, and road easements for County roads. Restoration work has previously been permitted and completed at the south end of Discovery Bay(under MLA07-0572), and this proposal is intended to further enhance the bay. Estuary habitats are present along the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay, and artificial ponds occur in the southern portion of the project area. The ponds were created when fill materials were placed in Discovery Bay to construct the railroad tracks that are no longer used. Fill materials were historically put in Discovery Bay, and as part of this fish enhancement project, the bay will be contoured to conditions more suitable for fish and wildlife. A water line within the railroad grade will be relocated to an area immediately adjacent to Discovery Bay. This project moves the water line from Discovery Bay to land adjacent to the Bay. A segment of the Olympic Trail alignment is proposed above the water line. Much of the vegetation in the Highway 101 right of way is weedy, herbaceous species although a few native and non-native trees and shrubs may occur in the right-of-way. Vegetation occurs on the old railroad bed,but most of it is non-native woody and herbaceous species. Shoreline Designation: Pursuant to the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP), the shoreline designations in the project area are Suburban, Natural, Conservancy, and Aquatic. The area landward of the railroad tracks is designated as Suburban, while some areas waterward of the railroad tracks are designated as Conservancy and Natural as well as Aquatic. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan designates the majority of the project area as Rural Residential one dwelling unit per 5 acres (RR 1:5), although portions of parcels adjacent to Highway 101 are designated as Neighborhood/Visitor Crossroad(NC). Site Visit: Jefferson County Development Review Division staff conducted a site visit as part of a pre-application conference(PRE12-00018)on September 6, 2012. Date of Application: A shoreline substantial development application was submitted to Jefferson County on July 1, 2013. The County did not send a written letter of completeness within the 28 days specified in JCC 18.40.110;therefore, the application was deemed complete by DCD on July 29, 2013. It was not until August 28,2013 that DCD reviewed the application for completeness(Exhibit 11). State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): The proposal is subject to review under SEPA. The SEPA Threshold Determination was issued on January 22,2014. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Proposal Noticing: Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23,2013 (Exhibits 21 and 23) • Notice of Public Hearing: February 12,2014(Exhibit 55) Notice was posted on the property: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 23,2013 (Exhibits 21 and 22) • Notice of Public Hearing: February 12,2014(Exhibits 55 and 56) NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 3 The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: October 22,2013 (E • Notice of Public Hearing : February 11,2014(Exhibit 55) � `' Public Hearing Date: February 25,2014 Page � ��._ �' PUBLIC COMMENT Adjacent property owners were notified of the shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal (Exhibits 21 and 55). Proposal Noticing: Public Response No written comments were received from the public during notice of application. DCD received a phone call October 13, 2013 from a person who leases space from an old train car on parcel 902231017. This person wanted to confirm that water would still be available to her commercial use under this proposal. As of February 13,2014,no comments were received by the public during the notice of public hearing. AGENCY COMMENT Agencies, including tribes, were notified of the pending shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal(Exhibits 21 and 55). As of February 13, 2014,no comments were received by agencies during the notice of public hearing. Proposal Noticing: Agency Response SEPA comments were received from Washington State Department of Ecology during the notice of application (Exhibit 28). Comments pertained to general guidance for flooplains management,water quality, and water guidance. In response to the floodplains management comment,the project engineer clarified that no increase in base flood elevation would be expected as a result of this project(Exhibit 34). Jefferson County Environmental Health reviewed the relocation of the waterline and provided conditions of approval, which are included at the end of this staff report. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED • Shoreline Substantial Development Permits (SSDP) for restoration activities, re-location of a water line, and construction of a non-motorized trail. APPLICABLE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES • Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County, adopted March 7, 1989 • Jefferson County Unified Development Code, adopted December 18, 2000, effective January 16,2001 • Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, adopted August 28, 1998 PROPOSED FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following section constitutes staff findings and conclusions regarding consistency of the application with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the Jefferson County Code, and the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. Following these findings and conclusions are conditions recommended for consideration by the Hearing Examiner. Any NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 4 LOG IT w iF # 5-3 Page�o of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations may be adopted, rejected, or modified by the Hearing Examiner based on testimony or evidence presented during the course of review. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is to restore habitat conditions in Discovery Bay for fish and wildlife. The applicant is proposing to remove fill from an old railroad bed that crosses the southeastern portion of Discovery Bay,relocate a water line in the old railroad bed to the shorelands between Discovery Bay and adjacent roadways, restore the Snow Creek estuary, and construct a segment of the Olympic Trail system over the water line (Exhibits 6, 13, and 45). Specifically,the proposal includes: • Removing armoring from an abandoned railroad grade (constructed through former tideflats) and restoring more natural beach profile; • Restoring tidal circulation to an enclosed, artificially-created freshwater pond/wetland(Cherry Pond); • Removing fill from the mouths of four small streams that flow into the project area; • Removing a creosote timber railroad bridge(trestle); • Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegates located between a lagoon and a pond(mill pond); • Removing 1,700 feet of railroad grade and three associated railroad trestle bridges near Snow and Salmon Creeks; • Removing sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek; • Disposing spoils onsite at upland locations; • Re-locating a waterline that was located within the railroad grade into WSDOT and local road rights-of- way; • Using directional drilling beneath Snow and Salmon Creek for installation of the re-located waterline; • Extending a culvert to a non-fish bearing stream at Highway 101; • Constructing a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the waterline alignment; • Constructing rock walls, reinforced slopes, and a soldier pile wall to support the trail prism (and minimize the ecological impacts of the trail);and • Bridging two fish-bearing stream mouths with box culverts at WSDOT culverts. 2. The proposed development is within shoreline jurisdiction, and is subject to the critical areas regulations specified in the Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.22 JCC). The following critical areas were identified on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat areas (habitat for listed species; Type S, F, and N streams); wetlands; geologically hazardous areas (seismic hazards); frequently flooded areas; aquifer recharge area(susceptible); and seawater intrusion protection zones(high risk and coastal). Staff Comment: The application is for a mostly self-mitigating project. The applicant submitted a wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation report( Exhibit 6). These reports show that the amount of restoration work more than compensates for the temporary construction-related impacts and the stabilizing of the trail prism. Jefferson County noticed the application to state agencies, tribes, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but did not receive any comments indicating critical areas would be adversely affected by the project. In addition, the application is being reviewed by federal agencies for federal permits, which are reviewed for potential adverse effects of the project on listed species. Based on the reviews of this application, it is assumed that listed fish and wildlife species would not be adversely affected by the proposal. The project engineer prepared a report to address construction of the waterline and Olympic Discovery Trail within a geologically hazardous area (Exhibit 6). This report provides recommendations for construction, which have been incorporated into the project design plans. A recommended condition in this staff report includes the requirement to adhere to all design recommendations specified in the geotechnical report. The project area is mapped on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map and must comply with the FEMA Biological Opinion (BiOp). To ensure compliance with the BiOp, a recommended condition of approval is included in this staff report that requires the applicant to obtain a permit from the U.S.Army Corps of NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 5 LOG ITEtvi # ss Page 6 of /l Engineers prior to beginning any work on the project (a federal permit ensures compliance with the Endangered Species Act). The proposed project occurs within a susceptible aquifer recharge area and within a high risk and a coastal seawater intrusion protection zone(SIPZ). The type of project proposed,however,would not be expected to adversely affect the aquifer recharge area or the SIPZ. 3. Pursuant to JCC 18.30.070 (Stormwater Management Standards), the proposed development must comply with the minimum standards of the 2012 Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Based on the Jefferson County Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that was submitted,the proposal is a large project that must comply with all Minimum Requirements in the stormwater manual. The plans have been prepared by an engineer and are assumed to comply with the stormwater manual. 4. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: The proposed shoreline development is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The following Plan goals and policies apply to the proposal: a) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Goal 5.0(p. 8-24) states: "Allow development along shorelines which is compatible with the protection of natural processes, natural conditions, and natural functions of the shore environment." Staff Comment: The proposed development has undergone review under the Jefferson County Code, including the shoreline regulations (Chapter 18.25 JCC). As conditioned through existing Jefferson County regulations, the proposal is consistent with this policy. Also, this application is intended to restore natural shoreline processes, conditions,and functions. b) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Policy 5.1 (p. 8-24) states: "Regulate shoreline land use activities based on the best available scientific information. " Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to resource agencies and tribes for review and comments. c) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Policy 5.2(p.8-24) states: "Protect nearby properties and the shoreline environment from the individual or cumulative effects of development that may interfere with the functions of sediment transport systems along the shoreline." Staff Comment: The application is intended to restore natural processes and was sent to agencies and tribes for comment;therefore, it is not expected to interfere with sediment transport functions. d) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environmental Policy 5.6(p.8-24): "Manage shoreline hazard areas such as unstable bluffs and erosion and coastal flood hazard areas to protect public safety and public and private property." Staff Comment: A licensed engineer prepared a geotechnical report and the design plan sheets (Exhibits 6 and 13); therefore, it is assumed that the proposal will not adversely affect public safety or private property. A recommended condition in this staff report includes a requirement to construct the project per the approved plan sheets and to adhere to the recommendations in the geotechnical report. Finally, the permit will be conditioned to require a building permit,which also involves a review for public safety. e) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environmental Policy 5.7 (p.8-24): "Manage storm water for proposed and existing development in a manner consistent with Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington." Staff Comment: The proposal was designed by an engineer and is assumed to comply with the stormwater manual. 5. Jefferson County Code: The Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.40 JCC) requires that one Public Hearing be held for each proposed project. Staff Comment: The scheduled public hearing constitutes the single hearing for this project. it NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 6 LOG ITEM Page-7—of 7 . 6. Shoreline Master Program: The proposal is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program(SMP). The proposed project would be constructed within the following shoreline designations: Conservancy,Natural, Suburban, and Aquatic. Staff Comment: The SMP applies to this proposal, which is subject to all applicable shoreline program policies and performance standards. The following sections of the SMP are specifically applicable to the proposal; additional policies and performance standards may apply: JCC 18.25.110 Aquatic(open water; restoration) JCC 18.25.120 Natural(southern end of Discovery Bay,north of railroad tracks;restoration) JCC 18.25.130 Conservancy(southeast portion of Discovery Bay,north of railroad tracks;restoration) JCC 18.25.140 Suburban(south of railroad tracks; restoration,waterline,trail) JCC 18.25.180 Primary Uses(recreation/day use in suburban designation) JCC 18.25.190 Secondary Uses(waterline installation in suburban designation) JCC 18.25.200 Conditional Uses(restoration in all shoreline designations) JCC 18.25.220 Unclassified Uses(restoration in all shoreline designations) JCC 18.25.400 Recreational Facilities(trail construction) JCC 18.25.450 Utilities(waterline installation) 7. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(1)defines areas in the Aquatic designation as: All water bodies, including marine waters, lakes, rivers, and streams, and their respective water columns and underlying lands that are defined as shorelines of the state. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: (a) The aquatic environment should be managed for appropriate use activities, allowing either multiple use or single dominant use in areas of unique conditions, while recognizing and ensuring compatibility with adjacent upland shoreline designations. Staff Comment: A primary use of Discovery Bay is fish and wildlife habitat, which will be restored as part of this project. Removal of the old railroad bed and the waterline from the aquatic designation will improve views (and water enjoyment) of the bay from the adjacent parcels while improving habitat conditions. Creation of channels in the Snow Creek estuary will improve the resource value for fisheries. Work on this proposal within the aquatic designation does not affect adjacent upland shoreline designation(Suburban). (b) Abandoned structures within the aquatic designation should be removed when they no longer serve their permitted use unless retaining such structures will provide a net environmental benefit,for example, artificial reef effect of concrete anchors. Staff Comment: Existing structures within the bay that are not an environmental benefit will be removed as part of this project. Any structures installed as part of this project(such as culverts)will stay in place until they need to be repaired in the future. A recommended condition of approval has been added to this staff report to address this requirement. (c) All structures placed on the water's surface should have as low a profile as possible to minimize visual intrusion. Staff Comment: Any structures (such as culverts)will be low on the surface of the water. No visual intrusion is expected as a result of this project. (d) Potential conflicts with adjacent uses such as commercial fishing, recreation, and navigation should be considered in the review of proposed aquatic developments. Development should not be permitted where they would materially interfere with existing uses. Staff Comment: The proposal would not adversely affect commercial fishing, recreation, and navigation, or materially interfere with existing uses. (e) Aquatic developments should not locate in areas where the ecological quality of the shoreline environment would be degraded NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 7 LOG ITEM Page 8 of Staff Comment: The focus of this application is enhancement of shoreline habitats. Jefferson County noticed the application to Washington Departments of Ecology, Natural Resources, and Fish and Wildlife as well as the Tribes. DCD did not receive any comments indicating concern for the shoreline environment. Therefore, the proposal would not be expected to negatively affect the ecological quality of the shoreline environment. An HPA is required from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the project. The HPA will stipulate construction windows and design requirements to minimize the potential for adverse impacts to existing aquatic life and habitat conditions in the bay. This shoreline permit would be conditioned to comply with requirements of the HPA. By meeting the HPA requirements, the potential for degradation of the shoreline environment will be reduced. In addition, this proposal has been reviewed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which includes an assessment of the proposal on federally-listed species. 0 Aquatic developments should be designed and located to ensure that they do not have a significant adverse impact on natural dynamic processes of shoreline formation or change. Staff Comment: The proposal is intended to restore some natural processes to Discovery Bay. As such, the proposed project is not expected to adversely impact any natural processes occurring along the shoreline. (g) Aquatic developments should make minimal and appropriate use of approved pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics, vaccines, growth stimulants, or other chemicals. Operators shall receive prior review and approval for their use from the appropriate federal and state agencies. Staff Comment: Not applicable to this project. (h) Only federal and state approved antifouling agents should be used in aquatic developments. Staff Comment: Not applicable to this project. Master Program JCC 18.25.110(3)contains the following performance standards: (a) Structures, equipment, and materials shall be removed as soon as practicable upon the cessation of a project's operation or a structure's useful life. Any structure that is damaged or breaks away in the water shall be repaired or removed by the permittee as soon as practicable. Permittees who anticipate a temporary interruption of the use of a facility or structure may be allowed to keep it in its permitted location provided they notify and receive written concurrence from the Jefferson County planning and building department. Any structure not utilized for over one year shall be removed regardless of future anticipated use unless prior permission has been granted by the Jefferson County planning and building department upon showing of good cause. Staff Comment: This has been addressed through the recommended conditions of approval. (b) Permittees for developments in the aquatic designation shall be required to post a performance bond or other suitable guarantee to ensure removal of all structures, equipment, and materials, should the project cease operation. The county may require security beyond that required by the state if it is determined that state requirements are not adequate to secure removal of structures. Staff Comment: Bonds would be appropriate to ensure the removal of overwater commercial or industrial structures, where the use may be discontinued and the facilities may have structures that would entail significant cost for their removal. Since the proposal is for restoration of Discovery Bay, no structures would need to be removed. For this reason,no bond has been recommended. (c) Permittees shall be liable for all damages to public and private property should their structures fail. The county may require liability insurance beyond that required by the state if it is determined that state requirements are not adequate to cover damages. Staff Comment: This applicant has submitted engineered stamped plans for the restoration work and no damages are anticipated in the aquatic designation. A building permit will be required for slope stabilization work for portions of the waterline and the County will review the plans to ensure that this work would be constructed to the required building standards. The County did not receive any comments from WSDOT and it is assumed that there are no state concerns about slope stabilization within the Highway 101 right-of-way. Therefore, the potential for liability issues are relatively low and no liability insurance has been recommended. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 8 LOG ITEM gage 9 of (d) Aquatic developments shall not be approved in narrow channels, shipping lanes, or in other areas where they are a significant hazard to navigation. Staff Comment: The proposed structure would not be located in a narrow channel or a shipping lane. Based on the proposed location, it is not expected to be a navigational hazard. (e) All structures that could interfere with navigation shall be marked in accordance with the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. Staff Comment: Since most of the work to be conducted in the aquatic designation is restoration of Discovery Bay, no navigational interference is expected. However, to ensure compliance, a recommended condition is included at the end of this staff report that would require the applicant to comply with any requirements established by the U.S. Coast Guard,as it pertains to marking for navigational purposes. (fl The maximum level for noise generated in the aquatic designation shall be 50 dBA at a distance of 100 feet. This standard shall not apply to vessels that are underway. All feasible methods shall be employed to minimize overwater noise generation. Staff Comment: The project involves restoration of Discovery Bay, re-location of a waterline, and construction of a non-motorized trail system. The project is not expected to generate noise. (g) Structures placed in the aquatic designation shall blend into the surroundings to the greatest extent feasible utilizing appropriate color(s), texture, nonreflective materials, and other design characteristics. Staff Comment: The proposal does not include structures that would not blend into the surroundings. 8. Master Program JCC 18.25.120(1)defines areas in the Natural designation as: A shoreline possessing unique or fragile features either natural or cultural, that are essentially unaltered from their natural state or relatively intolerant of human use other than that for passive activities. Included are those containing hazardous or unique environmental conditions, such as highly erosive bluffs, tidal marshes, estuaries, and active landslides. Master Program JCC 18.25.120(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: (a) Aquaculture developments and mechanized harvest practices involving substantial substrate modification through dredging, trenching, digging, or adverse sedimentation should be prohibited in wetlands and estuaries which are natural environmental designations in this master program. Staff Comment: Aquaculture is not proposed in the estuary. Any dredging that would occur as part of the restoration effort in the estuary is intended to re-create channels and re-establish habitats within the estuary. 9. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(1)defines areas in the Conservancy designation as: An area with valuable natural, cultural, or historical resources or environmental conditions that should be protected, conserved, and managed to the extent that a continual supply of those resources such as soil, water, timber,fish, shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted but are maintained. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: To protect, conserve, and manage existing resources and valuable historical and cultural areas in order to ensure sustained resource stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions are not subject to inappropriate uses. Staff Comment: The criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are found in WAC 173-27-150, which requires that the proposed development be consistent with: RCW 90.58 Shoreline Management Act; WAC 173-27 Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Provisions; and the local shoreline management master program. The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the Shoreline Conditional Use permit. As conditioned through the Shoreline Conditional Use and review under the UDC, the proposed project complies with this policy. 10. Master Program JCC 18.25.140(1)defines areas in the Suburban designation as: NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 9 LOG ITEM s-2 Page /0 of 11 Areas where residential activity may approach urban density, but usually where densities permit space for small numbers of livestock, gardens, or wood lots. These areas are served by individual or community water supplies, but generally are not linked with utilities from an urban center. Commercial activities to serve the needs of the immediate area are considered an integral part of this designation. Master Program JCC 18.25.140(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: To provide permanent residential and recreation areas outside of urban areas, so long as development of these areas provides adequate facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, open space, and the like without severe degradation to the lifestyle that was sought initially. Staff Comment: The criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are found in WAC 173-27-150, which requires the proposed development to be consistent with: RCW 90.58 Shoreline Management Act; WAC 173-27 Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Provisions; and the local shoreline management master program. The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the Shoreline Secondary and Conditional Use permit. As conditioned,the proposed project complies with this policy. 11. Master Program JCC 18.25.180(1)defines areas in the Primary uses as: In general, those categories of uses that are deemed as being preferable with the definition and policy of a particular shoreline destination. Staff Comment: Primary uses are permitted administratively. The applicant has decided to have the entire proposal reviewed collectively, rather than separately, as allowed under JCC 18.40.030(2). For this reason, the Primary use portion of this proposal is included in this staff report. Master Program JCC 18.25.180(2)contains criteria applying to areas so designated: Primary uses are presumed to be generally consistent with the policies and definition of the shoreline designation where it is located. Projects will be reviewed for consistency with specific goals and policies and must comply with the performance standards specified for the particular type of development being reviewed. Staff Comment: The proposal has been reviewed against all relevant shoreline requirements. 12. Master Program JCC 18.25.190(1)defines Secondary Uses as: Those uses that are not automatically deemed as being preferable within the scope of the definition or policy o f a particular shoreline environmental designation. Master program JCC 18.25.190(2)contains criteria that states: Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for secondary uses will have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: (a) The proposal will not be contrary to the general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, nor shall it be contrary to the goals,policies, and performance standards of this master program. Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to state agencies, including Washington Department of Ecology, for review and comment. As conditioned, the proposal meets the applicable policies and performance standards of the Shoreline Master Program and is consistent with the SMA. (b) The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. Staff Comment: The proposal will not materially interfere with the public use of public land nor will it interfere with private use of private lands. (c) The proposed project will not cause unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or other properties and will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. Staff Comment: The proposal is to restore the environment and this will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 10 LOG ITEM Paged of /6 13. Master Program JCC 18.25.200(1)defines Conditional Uses as: Those uses that are deemed least preferable within the scope of the definition and policies of a particular shoreline environmental designation. While not prohibited outright, these uses are an exception to the general rule. A conditional use permit is intended to allow for flexibility and the exercise of judgment in the application of regulation in a manner consistent with the policies of the Act and this master program. Staff Comment: Since Jefferson County does not have policies and performance standards specific to restoration, in the current shoreline master program, much of this proposal is considered an unclassified use that triggers review as a conditional use. While many conditional use applications meet the definition of`least preferable', this application is preferable as it is intended to improve shoreline habitat conditions and processes and it does not negatively affect adjacent land uses. Master Program JCC 18.25.200(2)contains criteria that states: Applicants for shoreline conditional use permits shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that they are in conformance with WAC 173-27-160, as amended, and all of the following: (a) The proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the policies of the master program. Staff Comment: The substantial development criteria are addressed through the review of the application for a Shoreline Conditional Use permit. As conditioned,the proposed project complies with these policies. (b) The proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of the public shorelines. Staff Comment: The restoration work and the relocation of the waterline will not result in interference of the ability of the public to use the shoreline and the segment of the Olympic Discovery trail. These areas will be enhanced for public use of the shoreline. (c) The proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other permitted uses within the area. Staff Comment: The proposal is not inconsistent with other permitted uses and provides some enhancement of existing uses in the area. As conditioned,the proposal is compatible with other permitted uses within the area. (d) The proposed use will cause no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located Staff Comment: The proposed project is to enhance the existing shoreline environment. Jefferson County did not receive comments from state agencies or tribes during the notice of application that would indicate the potential for adverse effects as a result of approving this project. As a staff recommended condition of approval, the proposal would be conditioned to comply with HPA requirements and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit conditions, which are intended to minimize the potential for adverse affects occurring due to construction. Therefore,no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline are expected. (e) The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. In those limited instances where a conditional use is proposed, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for similar action in the area. Staff Comment: No detrimental effects or cumulative impacts are likely to occur as a result of implementing this proposal. 14. Master Program JCC 18.25.220 contains criteria that states: Unclassified uses are those uses which are not classified in any other definitions or uses in Chapter 18.25 of the JCC. Such uses shall be reviewed as a conditional use including the applicant's additional burden to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances preclude reasonable use of the property consistent with the provisions of the master program. Staff Comment: Shoreline restoration is considered an unclassified use under Chapter 18.25 JCC. 15. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(1)defines recreational facilities as: NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 11 JG ITEM 61)2 /2—.of ;b Facilities such as parks, trails and pathways, campgrounds, and resorts that provide a means for relaxation, play, and amusement. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(2)contains prohibited uses and activities as follows: (a) Overnight recreational spaces or sites located on beaches, dunes, or intertidal areas. Staff Comment: Overnight recreation is not included in this proposal. A recommended condition of approval at the end of this staff report would prohibit overnight recreational uses within the project area. Master Program JCC 18.23.400(3)contains policies relevant to recreational facilities, as follows: (a) The concept of upland camping should be encouraged to prevent the concentration of clutter and leave the beaches, tidelands, streams, and their associated shorelines in basically their natural state. Staff Comment: Camping is not proposed. (b) Park design and operation should deal with the impact such activities have not only within park boundaries, but on adjacent properties and communities as well. Staff Comment: The segment of trail proposed is part of a larger trail system that will provide recreational opportunities and views of the restored shoreline environment. Adjacent property owners were noticed and three signs were posted in the project area. No comments were received from property owners in the area; therefore, it is assumed that the trail will not impact adjacent properties. (c) Recreational facilities should make adequate provisions for: (1) Traffic, both inside and outside the facility; (ii) Proper water and sewage disposal methods; (iii) Security and fire protection; (iv) The prevention of overflow and trespass onto adjacent properties. Staff Comment: The segment of trail will not result in traffic, does not require potable water or septic system, and will not require additional security or fire protection. Much of the trail is on public land and adjacent parcels have commercial uses that could benefit from public access from the trail. (d) Public access to public shorelines and surface waters should be encouraged. Staff Comment: The project will provide views of the shoreline to the public but is not designed to encourage the public into the restoration areas. (e) Offshore recreational devices should not interfere with navigation of waterways. Staff Comment: Offshore recreational devices are not proposed. (I Trails and pathways on steep shoreline bluffs should be designed to not adversely affect bank stability. Staff Comment: The trail would not be located on a steep shoreline bluff. (g) Public recreational developments should be consistent with adopted park, recreational, and open space plans of the county, when appropriate. Staff Comment: This is not applicable to the proposal. (h) Swim rafts used for moorage purposes should comply with the policies and performance standards for offshore moorage devices. Staff Comment: Swim rafts and moorages are not proposed. (i) Stairways, landings, and boathouses should not be located waterward of existing bulkheads, banks, or the ordinary high water mark. Staff Comment: No stairs, landings, or boathouses are proposed. Master Program JCC 18.25.400(4)contains performance standards for recreational facilities, as follows: (a) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for water supply, sewage disposal, and garbage collection. Staff Comment: Water supply, sewage disposal, and garbage collection are not required for construction of the trail. (b) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for vehicular parking. Staff Comment: The trail segment is for non-motorized uses and is not associated with a parking lot or a trail head. It is possible that people who visit the commercial buildings in the vicinity of the project area could access NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 12 LOG ITEM age i!of / the trail for such recreational activities as walking, biking, or bird watching. Additional parking spaces are not required for this segment of trail. (c) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions for enforcement of laws and regulations associated with use of the facilities being proposed Staff Comment: The segment of trail is not expected to attract a large group of people; most will be walking the trail, biking along the trail, or observing wildlife from an adjacent business. No additional enforcement would be needed for these types of activities. (d) Recreational facilities shall make adequate provisions such as screening, buffer strips,fences, and signs to prevent park overflow and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private or public properties. Staff Comment: A park is not proposed. The trail is not likely to attract sufficient numbers of people to affect adjacent property owners. Replanting is proposed and this will provide some screening over time as the plants grow. (e) Recreational facilities shall establish and enforce regulations that prohibit tree cutting and limit the taking of marine life, driftwood, and the like. Staff Comment: The shoreline is being proposed for restoration and is not expected to have habitat and wildlife that would be collected immediately upon completion of the project. Much of the project area is owned by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and no future tree removal is expected. (f) Signs associated with recreational facilities shall be kept to a minimum in number and size and shall be erected as informational or directional aids only. Staff Comment: No recreational signs are proposed at this time. However, a condition of approval has been included should the plans change prior to building permitting for the trail. (g) Adequate provisions shall be made for the control of fires both within recreational facilities and between recreation al facilities and adjacent private or public lands. Staff Comment: The proposal does not include facilities for fire. (h) Unless specifically designed for that purpose,park and recreational facilities shall prohibit the off-road use of all terrain vehicles in order to protect natural features as well as the enjoyment and value of adjacent private and public properties. Staff Comment: The trail is not intended for use by all terrain vehicles. (i) Applicants for substantial development permits for recreational facilities may be required to provide adequate information to demonstrate the safety of proposed equipment and facilities. Staff Comment: The trail has been engineered and a building permit is required for any slope stabilization over four feet in height. A geotechnical report was prepared that addresses seismic hazards in the property area. The applicant has submitted information to show the trail would be safe. 0) Overnight recreational facilities shall comply with all applicable regulations and guidelines, including JCC 18.25.300. Staff Comment: Overnight facilities are not included in the proposal. 16. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(1)defines utilities as: Services or facilities that produce, transit, carry, store,process, or dispose of electric power, gas, water, sewage, communications, oil, and the like. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(2)contains policies specific to utilities,as follows: (a) Whenever utilities must be placed in a shoreline area, the location should be chosen to not obstruct or destroy scenic views. Whenever feasible, these facilities should be placed underground or designed to do minimal damage to the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline area. Staff Comment: The waterline will be installed below ground. Views will not be adversely affected by this proposal. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 13 LUG ITEM cif- of /6 (b) To an extent feasible, Jefferson County should incorporate major utility corridors on shorelines into their programs and plans for public access to and along waterbodies. Staff Comment: This application includes public access to shoreline views by installing the trail over the waterline. (c) Utilities should be located to meet the needs of future populations in areas planned to accommodate this growth. Staff Comment: The waterline is being relocated as a result of restoration work in Discovery Bay. The location and the size of the pipe are sufficient to meet future water needs (assuming additional water rights are obtained from the state). To comply with water supply requirements in JCC 18.30.030, this application was reviewed by Jefferson County Environmental Health (Exhibits 34, 42, 44, 50, and 52). This department provided conditions of approval of approval that are included in this staff report. (d) Upon completion of installation and maintenance projects of shorelines, banks should be restored to preproject configuration, replanted with native species, and be provided with maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established. Staff Comment: The proposal includes replanting with native species. Master Program JCC 18.25.450(3)contains performance standards that pertain to the project, as follows: (a) Utilities shall be installed adjacent to or within existing utility or circulation easements or rights-of-way whenever feasible. Staff Comment: The waterline will be installed within the road and highway rights-of-way. (b) Utilities shall be installed underground whenever feasible. Staff Comment: The waterline will be installed underground. (c) Utilities shall be designed and installed to meet future needs when possible. Staff Comment: This waterline has been designed and will be installed to meet future needs, assuming state water rights can be obtained. (d) When feasible, utility corridors shall serve multiple uses such as shoreline access or recreational trails or pathways. Staff Comment: A segment of the Olympic Discovery trail will be constructed over the waterline corridor. (e) Utilities installed in the water, beach, or upon tidal areas shall assure that water quality and marine life will not suffer degradation. Staff Comment: The project is part of a restoration effort in Discovery Bay, and no degradation is expected as a result of installing the waterline. The application was noticed to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and no comments were received. (I) Installation of utilities shall assure the prevention of siltation or beach erosion. Staff Comment: The proposal has been engineered and installation of utilities is not expected to result in siltation or beach erosion. (g) Upon completion of installation or maintenance projects, banks shall be restored to a suitable configuration and stability, replanted with native species, and provided with maintenance care until the newly planted vegetation is established. Staff Comment: The applicant is proposing to replant disturbed areas with native vegetation(Exhibit 39). (h) Utility discharges and outfalls shall be located, designed, constructed, and operated so degradation to water quality, marine life, and general shoreline ecosystems is kept to an absolute minimum. Staff Comment: No discharges or outfalls are proposed. This application is intended to enhance Discovery Bay for fish and wildlife so no degradation from installation of the waterline is expected. (i) Both during and after installation, utilities shall assure that geohydraulic shore processes and marine life are basically maintained in their natural condition. Staff Comment: The waterline would be installed above ordinary high water mark in relatively degraded habitats adjacent to Highway 101 and County roads. With replanting and adjacent restoration efforts, natural conditions should be maintained. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 14 LOG ITEM h age 15- of /6 (1) Utilities located in floodprone areas shall be provided with adequate flood protection and shall not be installed to increase flood hazard or other damage to life or property. Staff Comment: Recommended conditions of approval at this end of this staff report address this requirement (k) Flammable or toxic materials shall not be stored in areas subject to flooding. Staff Comment: No flammable or toxic materials have been proposed as part of this project (l) Utilities shall not be installed in areas subject geological hazards, unless it can clearly be demonstrated that such hazards can be overcome. Staff Comment: An existing waterline is being relocated from Discovery Bay (railroad fill) to an upland area along the south end of Discovery Bay that is mapped as a seismic hazard. A geotechnical report was prepared as part of this project. Based on this report,the waterline would be installed to applicable current safety standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, staff recommends Approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development application. Staff found the proposal to be consistent with the applicable Code requirements and that the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit should be granted subject to the following conditions. Staff Conditions: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed(with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to proposed structures shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of any structures,they will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. The applicant shall implement the Site Preparation and TESC Plan prepared for this project and shall ensure all applicable BMPs are in place to protect water quality. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the water line replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1)year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 15 LOG ITEM i Page lb of fip 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit 50 and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to relocate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System #07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. Dated February 13, 2014 Prepared by Donna Frostholm,Associate Planner and project planner for this application to Jefferson County Department of Community Development. NOSC Shoreline Substantial Development MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033—Discovery Bay Restoration,Waterline Replacement,and Olympic Discovery Trail 16 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE LOG ITEM JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 �# '�p State of Washington) Page I of County of Jefferson) I, Sc1«h D � , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1)public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project,and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report,wetland delineation report,habitat management plan,and Section 7 consultation reports. The notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the 1 2. day of Tzbr.xu'y ,2014. A . - _A • (S •nature of person . ting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this aZ., day of CGy ,2014. Acknowledgement: '����uunttI \cP gym'•. Notary Public i for the State o ashington, _ m O .:o ZP� =_ residing in Ti es e,,.—Ca,., /ashington. _ ;v �s �G z My commission expires: l0-�1- ty pU$\-' tea•. •NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF �1 CRIME V Hi FEB 1 2 2014 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LOG ITEM JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER # 5 5 CASE NO. Page of CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this \\"'" day of A;;,rc.k_c,,rK ,2014, I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed, true and correct copies of in the above matter, addressed to: Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) V Agencies: See attached list. Interested Parties: See attached list. Applicant/Representative-Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction, Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. \/Newspapers(Notices Only) Official Posting Places(x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. EXECUTED this U day of V- b 4 ct r , 2014 at Port Townsend, Washington. g'■ .k4,/ '► • sr. I •ecla t G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2014.docx 902141007 !V �� '��� 902131002 902142001 902141009 902133012 ik'� 902132001 ll *10 902141008 ` /_`D 902131007` ,I VP:,\.trai 1P-All,y .,-.Afj Topx■-■" 902144001 902144003 a D ', D C'902133012 902142001 � �� O,,: 902144002 D , or , 902133005 ;',D 406% 902144005 -' D S. ,.\ # 902143007 902144007 I_`�D D D .` ..``` 902144006 '%DO ODD p►.. 902143008 902144008 1&\\ a �D 1.• 902232003 , •.� 0 1�4*.` iw,,,,,---w ,...*,\.-0-:_4:' 902232003 OD` �� � � D D - >���1,it LOG G ��M 902231005 D 1 � 902232004 epos►i sD D � O��� c Pa e of 1(,� 902232002 902231024 r .0i 902231006 G 902232005 III 902232006 902231007 902243038,A ,,!,l 111•0000?P°MIIIPIIII I r �f 902234005 /,(, �� ®� ` 902241014 902234006 O ` 902243042 902232001 ' 902243001 902232002 902234007 902233002 `�'�it Al 902244001 902233005 , 902244001 902244001 902233014 _ / .. 902234016 902233004 444 902233006 902234001 till'902233011 I 902244001 902233007 Al 902233010 902244001 902244001 902233008 902244001 902261004 �902234001 902252002 902251006 902251003 902262004 902262002 902252003 `902261001 902261001 902251007 902251005 •02261001 902252014 902251001 902262003 902252021 902261005 902261009 902251002 902263002 902252013 902264040 r\ 902264040 226404,, 902253009 Ilk 902263002 902264002 902264040''` 902253003 902254002 902254001 LOG ITEM 902231018 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV Page 600 CAPITOL WAY Nof OLYMPIA, WA 985011076 902234002 WILLIAM E SULLIVAN 391 WASHINGTON HARBOR RD SEQUIM, WA 983828546 902234013 THE LOCAL 101 LLC PO BOX 1784 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983680199 902233012 DOROTHEA TOOKER 1215 JEFFERSON ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983686620 LOG 902231010 902231015 KAREN BLESSING CHARLES J DOYLE PO BOX 1491 PO BOX 141 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983680044 CHIMACUM, WA 983250141 902243048 902234012 CHRISTOPHER CALERO THEODORE J EIDSMOE SUSAN CALERO 84 ASH LOOP 173 FAIRMOUNT RD PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689023 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689745 902243039 902231009 JULIE A CAMPBELL BRIAN R HARDCASTLE 405 STATE ROUTE 20 KATHRINE E HARDCASTLE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689384 6330 SECHELT INLET RD CANADA, 964518001 902231024 VLADISLAVA CERVENKA MICHAEL HUNTER 232 PETERSON RD ELLESA HUNTER PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983688706 9552 4TH AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 981172115 902243040 902231017 GERRY A CONNELLY KURT JAFAY 81 E RIDGEVIEW DR PO BOX 1048 SHELTON, WA 985849538 CARLSBORG, WA 983241048 902231011 964514702 ROGER C DECKARD JEFFERSON COUNTY PUD#1 AUDREY DECKARD PO BOX 929 282224 US HIGHWAY 101 PORT HADLOCK, WA 983390929 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689332 902231022 902243033 JOHN DICKSON JEFFERSON LAND TRUST MELANIE DICKSON 1033 LAWRENCE ST 282084 US HIGHWAY 101 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983686523 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689331 964516004 902243016 THOMAS R JOHNSON WALTER A MOA JR BETTY KIRCHNER GAIL L MOA 325 E WASHINGTON ST# 179 154 STATE ROUTE 20 SEQUIM, WA 983823488 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689311 LOG ITEM � SS 964514805 964514806 Page--���f JUNCTION CITY PROPERTIES INC MILDRED L NORTHUP TRUSTE 281732 US HIGHWAY 101 CHESTER I NORTHUP PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689314 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST BREMERTON, WA 983124051 902243018 964513802 GLEEFORD KESSLER JR JESS B NORTON JANET L KESSLER 651 OLD EAGLEMOUNT RD 374 STATE ROUTE 20 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689774 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689385 902234014 964510002 ALFRED F LANG TRUSTEE JENNIFER A PEDERSEN UN INT LANG FAMILY TRUST JEFFREY A PEDERSEN UN INT 970 LORANE HWY KAREN/SUSAN PEDERSEN EUGENE, OR 974052322 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983687307 902234003 902243027 L RENEE MARGGRAF KENNETH R PURDUE 282382 US HIGHWAY 101 BARBARA J PURDUE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689396 711 CUYAMA RD OJAI, CA 930232415 902231001 902243024 MJ AJ LLC SEA-KOTA INC PO BOX 930 2183 CRESCENT BEACH RD CHIMACUM, WA 983250930 PORT ANGELES, WA 983638703 902243009 902231021 WALTER MOA ELLYN SPENCER 154 STATE ROUTE 20 67 BRICKETT HILL CIR PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689311 HAVERHILL, MA 018301580 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV KEVIN LONG 600 CAPITOL WAY N 205 B W PATISON ST OLYMPIA,WA 98501-1076 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *DOE RICK MRAZ ELANDS OFFICE SEPAUNIT@ECY.WA.GOV LAG ITEM PO BOX 47775 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7703 g OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 of 1 Le SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WA STATE DNR *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON SEPA CENTER 5310 EAGLEMOUNT RD PO BOX 47015 CHIMACUM,WA 98325 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7015 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WDFW WDFW SEPA REVIEW MARGIE SCHIRATO SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV 414 BUSINESS PARK ROAD 1111 WASHINGTON ST. SE. SHELTON,WA 98584 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-3135 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY RUSSELL HOLTER PO BOX 47829 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7284 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD. LEANN JENKINS KINGSTON,WA 98346 LJENKINS @JAMESTOWNTRIBE.ORG SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *SUQUAMISH TRIBE *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW ALISON O'SULLIVAN KRIS MILLER PO BOX 498 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD SUQUAMISH,WA 98392 SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *SKOKOMISH TRIBE *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL RANDY N LUMPER, M.E.S. CYNTIA ROSSI 541 NORTH TRIBAL CENTER ROAD 7999 NE SALISH LANE SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 KINGSTON,WA 98346 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS PAT PERRYMAN ERIC KUZMA SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *JEFFERSON COUNTY EH DIRECTOR *JEFFERSON TRANSIT JARED KEEFER 1615 W. SIMS WAY PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WSD OF TRANSPORTATION OLYMPIC REG *WSDOT OLYMPIA REGION HQ SEPA REVIEW ART SPORSEEN, DR ENGINEER PO BOX 47440 5720 CAPITOL BLVD SE OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7440 OLYMPIA,WA 98570-6703 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 JCFPD#5 ATTN: BILL GRAHAM 2000 OLD GARDINER RD PO BOX 929 SEQUIM,WA 98382 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *PORT TOWNSEND SD#50 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 450 FIR STREET REGULATORY BRANCH PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PO BOX 3755 SEATTLE,WA 98134 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS *PORT TOWNSEND LEADER CHARLIE BERMANT TRISTAN HIEGLER 1939 E SIMS WAY PO BOX 552 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP13-00033 n AUMOCK DESIGN WORKS LOG ITEM 2303 HENDRICKS ST. PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 h-55 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 LOG ITEM 55 Pege_of POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by February 12, 2014. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3)days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at(360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA13-00088 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: LOG ITEM STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF ITEM REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV Page i" Of 600 CAPITOL WAY N � -- OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 Application Received Date: July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date: August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: February 12, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend & Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The public hearing will be conducted on Tuesday, February 25, 2014 in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/. LOG ITEM AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1)public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report,wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. The notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: /� the day of , 2014. LOG ITEM (Signature of person posting notice) i'age__1LofJ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of ,2014. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in ,Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_HearExam_APO_U.rpt 2/7/2014 Donna Frostholm From: Kaycee Hathaway Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:06 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: Publish Legal Notice- MLA13-00088 Public Hearing Publish Final.dox LOG ITEM ss Kaycee K Hathaway Page Hof 1i, From: Legals-Donna [mailto:legals @ptleader.com] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:01 PM To: Kaycee Hathaway Subject: Re: Publish Legal Notice - MLA13-00088 Public Hearing Publish Final.dox Kaycee, Your legal publication request has been received. Should we have further questions regarding the specifics of the submission we'll contact you to clarify them prior to the first publish date. Any correction or change requests need to be made by our deadline for that specific issue. We publish on Wednesdays and the standard deadline is 1:00 pm on the Monday prior, unless a holiday necessitates an earlier deadline. Those under a specific publication contract, your dates and times will follow those contract guidelines. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the notice has actually published and been measured. Generally our estimates will give you a figure very close to the actual cost. Cost is determined by the length and type of notice to be published. The 2014 rate for public and legal notices with the Leader will be $14.00 per column inch. Special rates apply to specific agencies under contract with the Leader. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the notice is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of the notice. As always, thank you for your business. We strive to serve our customers and their publication needs with the utmost care and professionalism. Thank you and have a wonderful day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 legals a(�ptleader.corn 1 Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. On Feb 7, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Kaycee Hathaway<KHathaway @co jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: February 12, 2014 LOG ITEM BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 5"S 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Page of ,( Account Number: 15833 Hello, Please publish the attached file, MLA13-00088 Public Hearing Publish Final.docx, one time in the February 12, 2014 edition of The Leader. Please respond to this email to confirm that you have received and will publish the notice. Thank you! Sincerely, Kaycee K Hathaway Plan Clerk,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 360-379-4454 khathawav @co.iefferson.wa.us <mla13-00088 public hearing publish final.rtff 2 Donna Frostholm From: Kaycee Hathaway Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:44 PM To: legals @ptleader.com Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Publish Legal Notice-MLA13-00088 Public Hearing Publish Final.dox Attachments: mla13-00088 public hearing publish final.rtf Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: February 12, 2014 LOG ITEM i BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 -� /& Account Number: 15833 Hello, Please publish the attached file, MLA13-00088 Public Hearing Publish Final.docx, one time in the February 12, 2014 edition of The Leader. Please respond to this email to confirm that you have received and will publish the notice. Thank you! Sincerely, Kaycee K Hathaway Plan Clerk,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 360-379-4454 khathaway @co.iefferson.wa.us Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: February 12, 2014 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account Number: 15833 LOG ITEM JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION 6w____LOf MLA13-00088 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner to review and receive comments on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 Application Received Date:July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28,2013 Application Notice Date: February 12,2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend & Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The public hearing will be conducted on February 25,2014 in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and(c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA13-00088 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner to review and receive comments on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: ITEM STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF G REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV S � 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 Application Received Date:July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28,2013 Application Notice Date: February 12, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004, 902 224 005, 902 243 046, 902 243 044, 902 243 020, 902 243 033, 902 243 048, 964 516 003, 964 516 903, Sections 13, 23, 24, Township 29N, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The public hearing will be conducted on Tuesday, February 25,2014 in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and (c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ L ik I —51< LOG IT . f2 Vt0111-e, ,A) rage 7 of 1 r 41" Date l' - .D j /� ' " '() —/ Message: e Called Phone � `T ✓ / PI : � 1 / II, Caller 1 ,� /ai / L Si9 7 IE Company Date 1 li .--/ Message: r Called Phone /�!/ �/ /77(8/ —('(OZ / i Company r Message: II`49 Date , .� —/ e=5-7 Message: Called Phone �� 4 Company I Date i n J/ j 2 3 ' / �'" Message: Called Phone 1 tT l 1 � �f _} � I 14 ✓ A) J- g5 - " ,�s ee 1 4 alley / .- i-/-7,/ /0 U� I 1 j� r/7'1 J / -4y 4/`7 t/vale Compan/y G 14 ._ /W .• t,idn�.- - r1,(lT)-.-iii e0, Aral, Date Message: Called Phone .../ " Caller /O 3 9/ _, 3 7 7 7 F c 1 ,, 1 Company 1 C� Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:18 PM To: Kevin Long; Linda Atkins Subject: RE: Permit conditions Attachments: exhibit x.pdf LOG ITEM Kevin: Pad Here is the exhibit. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:44 PM To: Linda Atkins; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Permit conditions HI Again Donna, I spoke with Linda and got some clarification.Can you now clarify for me what"exhibit x" is?The document that is linked is 200 pages long and exhibit x might prove useful in getting me to the right spot in the linked document. Thanks as always, Kevin From: Linda Atkins [mailto:LAtkins(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:31 PM To: Kevin Long; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin and Donna, This condition refers to the areas that were not dealt with directly in the industrial building location. Kevin, we talked about this in our office meeting to clarify several items.These would be soils in the area that would be to the north of the industrial site. If you have further questions and want me to go over the areas with you just give me a call. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: this e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42-56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager@nosc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:21 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Linda Atkins Subject: Re: Permit conditions 1 Donna, Regarding Item 17. "For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf." Who should I consult with at the County about this condition and how to satisfy it? I have the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that was done on the property, I am unable to attach it as it is too large.The contamination issues identified in the report have already been mediated and I want to be sure your office is aware of that. If they are aware of it or if the condition remains I'd like to discuss conducting further site investigations prior to construction to meet the needs of this requirement if possible. Thank you, " T Zvi J1 r Kevin Long P:=:. fM f Project Manager `'—°° -°--Y- North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@co jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:51 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin: Below are the conditions that I have identified so far. They are subject to change by DCD staff as I prepare for the hearing, by the Hearing Examiner, or by Washington Department of Ecology. Potential conditions of approval for the shoreline permit: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to the proposed structure shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of the structure,the stairs will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. Temporary erosion control measures shall be in place prior to construction, and BMPs such as silt fencing or hay bales shall be used to prevent erosion. 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 2 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the water line replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of a an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to re-locate an existing waterline. It does not include review or approval for any additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water i h s LUG IT From: Kevin Long [mailto:Drojectmanager(anosc.orq] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:14 AM To Donna Frostholm roe p _ of Subject: Permit conditions HI Donna, We are pulling together our specifications for the waterline construction project. I am wondering if there are any conditions you plan to put on the project that we should make our contractors aware of in the specifications. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 3 r• Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department 4:...) 3629 South D St., MS: 1045,Tacoma WA 98418-6813 ! 1 t 4 ril-6-il racow-PierceCounty (253)798-6047 Health Department Healthy People in HMO,Coattnutttri s A q e+ ( of WASTE DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION PROCESS- -- - --- Required Analysis/Analysis Conducted The parameter(s)and analytical method(s)indicated below must be performeet order.to characterize a waste stream.The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department recommen4ttte generator of-the waste submit for analysis the number of samples per volume of waste provided in the table below.Analytical results must be submitted to the Health Department's Waste Management Program prior to disposal of w to at a permitted solid waste facility located in Pierce County. Analytical results may be forwarded to the address elow. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department i, i '; , ' i 6 Waste Management Program • 3629 South D Street,MS: 1045 Tacoma, WA 98418-6813 Date: Facility Nance: Description of Waste: PARAMETER ANALYTICAL METHOD YES/NO SAMPLE TYPE Total Metals(RCRA 8) EPA#6010 TCLP Metals(RCRA 8) EPA#1311/6010 Total Petroleum WTPH-HCID,WTPH-G,WTPH-D,WTPH-418.1 Modified, Hydrocarbons WTPH-G or WTPH-D Extended Volatile Organics EPA#8010(Halogenated),8020(BTEX),8240 Semi-volatile Organics EPA#8270,8310(PAH's) PCB's EPA#8080,8140 TCLP Volatiles&Semi Paint Filter Test EPA#9095 pH EPA#9040,9045(soil) RECOMMENDED SAMPLING FREQUENCY VOLUME(cubic yards) NUMBER OF SAMPLES 0-25 2 26—100 3 101—500 5 501 -1000 7 1001—2000 10 One(1)additional sample for every 500 cubic yards of material over 2000 cubic yards. Revised 7/13 G:\LIBSHAREISRCPRO\WASTE Admin\FORMS\WDAanalysis.docx Donna Frostholm From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:30 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Sarah Doyle Subject: RE: NOSC MLA13-00088 NoPH - Discovery Bay Shoreline Application Yes Donna, We have this on our calendars.Sarah Doyle in our office will be picking up and posting the materials.She can be reached at the cc'd email or at our office#379-8051 if you need to contact her. Thanks, LOG ITEM Kevin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@ co.jefferson.wa.us] of_. Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 10:48 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: NOSC MLA13-00088 NoPH - Discovery Bay Shoreline Application Kevin: I am preparing the public hearing notice now that needs to go out next week for the February 25 hearing. Please plan on picking up the notice packet and notice boards on Tuesday, February 11 and having the notices posted by Wednesday, February 12. The notices should be posted in three locations: coming down towards the project area on Hwy 20 and at both ends of the project area along Hwy 101. If I remember correctly,you said two of the three boards were gone so I will have two more up front at the receptionist desk. Dovwg.a.fvo-thoimi/ Associate Tanner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend"Washington 98368 dfrosthohn@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Susan Porto LOG' i ! E Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 9:59 AM To: Linda Atkins; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 1:14 e„--1-0t.2-4„ I think the wording is great but, I would like to modify it slightly: This project is to re-locate an existing waterline for the Moa-Tel Water System#07816 and does not include review or approval of additional water connections. The water system is currently at capacity and has no available additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health (WSDOH), requires a separate application that shows compliance with WSDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. Susan From: Linda Atkins Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:34 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Susan Porto Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Donna, Great idea. I think the language should be the following but I have cc'd this to Susan for final OK. This project is to re-locate an existing waterline. It does not include review or approval for any additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health(WADOH), requires a separate application that shows compliance with WADOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Afways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County cOhFJDEVTIAEITY:tiOTICf: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN'42.56. finder the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN'42.56. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 2:30 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Does a condition need to be added that says: This project is to re-locate an existing waterline and it does not include any additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved, requires a separate application that shows compliance with the JCC and ability to obtain water rights from the state. Let me know if the above (or similar language) needs to be added to the NOSC application. 1 From: Linda Atkins Sent: Tuesday,January 14, 2014 9:53 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Susan Porto L OU ITEM Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Donna, Sorry for the delay. My comments are as follows: General for all portions of the project: • Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10'from all septic components. • Prior to completion and final signoff of this project the water line replacement approved by WDOH under ODW Project#13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH and construction drawings submitted to WDOH. Confirmation from DOH required. • Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. • Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project: • No land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100'of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of 1 year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30 cfu/100ml enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project: • Soils to be excavated should be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed.See the chart below and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecv/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 2 PARAMETER ANALYTICAL YES/NO METHOD Total Metals (RCRA 8) EPA #6010 TCLP Metals (RCRA 8) EPA #1311/6010 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons LUG ITEM WTPH-HCID, WTPH-+ --- ' Modified, ` agr iT WTPH-G or WTPH-D Volatile Organics EPA #8010 (Halogenat Semi-volatile Organics EPA #8270, 8310 (PAI PCB's EPA #8080, 8140 TCLP Volatiles & Semi Paint Filter Test EPA #9095 PH EPA #964019045 (soil) RECOMMENDED SAMPLING NUMBER OF SAMPLI FREQUENCY VOLUME (cubic yards) 0 - 25 2 26 - 100 3 101 --500 5 501 - 1000 7 1001 —2000 10 One (1) additional sample for every 500 cubic yards of material over yards. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 ACways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:22 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Importance: High Linda: 3 Sorry to keep pestering you but I am at a crucial point in permitting. I cannot move forward with the SEPA Threshold Determination or the staff report for the hearing examiner without a copy of the written information for the waterline portion of the project and an email from you that includes the EH conditions for the waterline. Just so you know, if I do not have the EH info by this Friday,1/17, in all likelihood, I will have to cancel the hearing scheduled for this project in February. Let me know if you have any questions. LOG Davwta'Fro l;hoLwv ITE .associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialiist '* 1 Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment ''.;:i0e,;1.. O 621 Sheridan Street Port'Townsend,"Washington 98368 dfrostham@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 4 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm LOG ITEM Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:45 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: Permit conditions - —L__.of 2 That condition is added in to address a specific code requirement. This is generally used for overwater construction, but could refer to a culvert (e.g., if a culvert become non-functional at some point in the future). I will delete the part of that condition that mentions stairs. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager(anosc.orq] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 10:25 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Permit conditions Thank you Donna.#7 is a bit of a mystery to me.What structure does it refer to?? Thanks, Kevin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholmCa�co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:51 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: Permit conditions Kevin: Below are the conditions that I have identified so far. They are subject to change by DCD staff as I prepare for the hearing, by the Hearing Examiner, or by Washington Department of Ecology. Potential conditions of approval for the shoreline permit: 1. Prior to constructing the trail, the applicant shall obtain a building permit from Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Stamped, engineered drawings shall be included in the building application submittal. 2. Prior to removing the railroad trestle, a demolition permit is needed (with ORCAA approval). 3. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 4. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Dan DaFoe with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at (360) 457-2516 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements. 6. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to beginning any work on this project. 7. Any damage to the proposed structure shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. At the end of the useful life of the structure,the stairs will be removed as soon as practicable. 8. The applicant shall adhere to all design recommendations in the geotechnical report prepared by Landau Associates. 9. The applicant shall adhere to all restoration and waterline installation plan sheets submitted to DCD for this project. 10. Temporary erosion control measures shall be in place prior to construction, and BMPs such as silt fencing or hay bales shall be used to prevent erosion. 1 1 11. The applicant shall comply with any applicable requirements in the U.S. Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. 12. Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from all septic components. 13. Prior to completion and final signoff of this project, the water line replacement approval by Washington Department of Health (WDOH) under ODW Project #13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH. Confirmation from WDOH is required. 14. Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. 15. Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of a an approved permitted location. 16. For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project, no land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100 feet of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of one (1) year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. 17. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project, soils to be excavated shall be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed. See the chart in Exhibit x and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecv/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. 18. This project is to re-locate an existing waterline. It does not include review or approval for any additional water connections. Any future water connections, beyond what has previously been approved by Washington State Department of Health, requires a separate application that shows compliance with WDOH requirements for the water system and Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for water rights. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager(anosc.org] LOU ITEM Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:14 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Permit conditions HI Donna, We are pulling together our specifications for the waterline construction project. I am wondering if there are any conditions you plan to put on the project that we should make our contractors aware of in the specifications. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 2 LOG ITEM # Page of .9--- br 11 Env 1 aVh,,' DJ iC Eke° '.� . ,�. re- ce.d (A4. 12c- Is w5ed orfru re 4 -(rne .jam 4. 0 , >D a /, Skri/t) _ • / vo-40' COAC 17 - 3N - 070 (.40A/ • , 10/11VDC/tre-e ''-1;-1/ ami79112A.-6ea u4 1 ---7ALezmLet_Tteitu;&-i,i4ctT 4-17Awf-it vtAA±Le kc-pfrt,i- t • Kit) # itu (23? j• - e *.• tf•ko Fe• re Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department JAN 2 8 .'1 3629 South D St.,MS: 1045,Tacoma WA 98418-6813 LOG ITEM 2:2 .- -Pierce Coumy (253)798-6047 # Health Department Pa a a-of 2- WASTE DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION PR Ess Required Analysis/Analysis Conducted The parameter(s)and analytical method(s)indicated below must be performed in order to characterize a waste stream.The Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department recommends the generator of the waste submit for analysis the number of samples per volume of waste provided in the table below.Analytical results must be submitted to the Health Department's Waste Management Program prior to disposal of waste at a permitted solid waste facility located in Pierce County. Analytical results may be forwarded to the address below. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department Waste Management Program 3629 South D Street,MS: 1045 Tacoma,WA 98418-6813 Date: Facility Name: Description of Waste: R yr 4- w#r,4 +�^ ?' ,..1 Total Metals(RCRA 8) EPA#6010 TCLP Metals(RCRA 8) EPA#1311/6010 Total Petroleum WTPH-HCID,WTPH-G,WTPH-D,WTPH-418.1 Modified, Hydrocarbons WTPH-G or WTPH-D Extended Volatile Organics EPA#8010(Halogenated),8020(BTEX),8240 Semi-volatile Organics EPA#8270,8310(PAH's) PCB's EPA#8080,8140 TCLP Volatiles&Semi Paint Filter Test EPA#9095 pH EPA#9040,9045(soil) RECOMMENDED SAMPLING FREQUENCY "J+x x. tz .® ` 1111, �.. �ggi, � ' ®^ `s';`s' , ,. 0-25 2 26-100 3 101—500 5 501 - 1000 7 1001—2000 10 One(1)additional sample for every 500 cubic yards of material over 2000 cubic yards. Revised 7/13 G:\LIBSHARE\SRCPRO\WASTE\AdminIFORMS\WDAanalysis.docx # L` 2 ITEM - 3._ I 9e d -6/4.e--. , K l'91/1 ,r r Ammill■NIENN1 t ti • 1 Donna Frostholm From: postmaster@co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:43 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT143337.txt; FW: sepa final nosc mla13-00088-jefferson county-re-send This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepaunit(aecy.wa.gov LOG ITEM LOG Donna Frostholm From: postmaster@co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:43 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT143327.txt; FW: sepa final nosc mla13-00088 -jefferson county-re-send This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepacenter(&dnr.wa.gov LOU T rr "'ter Donna Frostholm From: postmaster@co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:43 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT143318.txt; FW: sepa final nosc mla13-00088-jefferson county-re-send This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepadesktdfw.wa.goy . r rE 4g" 44sON coG JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelopment �s Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd(dico.iefferson.wa.us 41 N 6C Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE LOU ITEM AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: January 22,2014 FILE NUMBER: MLA13-00088/SDP13-00033 PROPONENTS: North Olympic Salmon Coalition(NOSC), Kevin Long(Project Manager) 205B W Patison Street Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. The proposal includes: • Removing armoring from an abandoned railroad grade (constructed through former tideflats)and restoring more natural beach profile; • Restoring tidal circulation to an enclosed, artificially-created freshwater pond/wetland (Cherry Pond); • Removing fill from the mouths of four small streams that flow into the project area; • Removing a creosote timber railroad bridge(trestle); • Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate located between a lagoon and a pond (mill pond); • Removing 1,700 feet of railroad grade and three associated railroad trestle bridges near Snow and Salmon Creeks; • Removing sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek; • Disposing spoils onsite at upland locations; • Re-locating a waterline that was located within the railroad grade into WSDOT and local road rights-of-way; • Using directional drilling beneath Snow and Salmon Creek for installation of the re-located waterline; • Extending a culvert to a non-fish bearing stream at Highway 101; • Constructing a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the waterline alignment; • Constructing rock walls, reinforced slopes, and a soldier pile wall to support the trail prism (and minimize the ecological impacts of the trail); and • Bridging two fish-bearing stream mouths with box culverts at WSDOT culverts. This proposal requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development permit for Secondary Uses and Conditional Uses from Jefferson County,which necessitates public noticing and a public hearing. Other state and local agencies, including but not limited to, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,Washington Department of Natural Resources, and U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,have been notified and have had an opportunity to comment on the proposal. PROPERTY LOCATION: south end of Discovery Bay; Sections 13,23,24, Township 29 North,Range 2 West,Port Townsend, Washington 98368. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: There are nine parcels and three property owners in the project area, as follows: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: • Parcel 902242005 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, TL Tax V (LS SR 101 R/W & TL V-1). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516003 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City, Blk 160, Lot 7. His parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902231004 is legally described as Section 23, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Gov Lots 1 &2 (E of SR 101) less Tax 4&26 LS PTN Gov Lot 1 Btwn SR 101 RR R/W(RR R/W Incl). This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 964516903 is legally described as Section 24, Range 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Junction City, Blk 169 Lots 11 & 12 (S of R/W), Blk 170 Lots 1 thru 1, Blk 179 Lot 12. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Highway 101,Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243046 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 83. This parcel is located within Discovery Bay,just north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20,Port Townsend, Washington. Jefferson Land Trust: • Parcel 902243044 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 68 (Enlg by Tx 76) Subj to Ease Subj to Rest Covt # 521386. This parcel is located within and adjacent to Discovery Bay, and immediately north of the intersection of Highways 101 and 20, Port Townsend, Washington. • Parcel 902243033 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 64, Subj/Rest Covt #521386. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road (and Highway 20),Port Townsend,Washington. • Parcel 902243020 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 52, Subj/Rest Covt# 521386. This parcel is located east of Discovery Bay and west of Fairmount Road and Highway 20,Port Townsend, Washington. Calero Parcel: • Parcel 902243048 is legally described as Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, WM, Tax 82. This parcel is located between Discovery Bay and Fairmount Road (and Highway 20), Port Townsend,Washington. NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. LOG VIES MLA1 NOSC Application Page 2 of 3 - J=am COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL PERIOD: Any appeal of this determination on the basis of noncompliance with the provision of Chapter 43.21c RCW(State Environmental Policy Act)must be submitted in writing before 4:00 p.m. Tuesday,February 4,2014 to the Jefferson County Development Review Division(Jefferson County Department of Community Development, 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,Washington 98368)for consideration by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner. Per JCC 18.40.810,the decision of the responsible official on Type III permits making a threshold determination of a DNS, approving a proposal subject to conditions, or denying a project under SEPA's substantive authority may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to JCC 18.40.280. The open record public hearing on the SEPA appeal shall be before the Hearing Examiner,who shall consider the appeal together with the decision on the project application in a single, consolidated hearing as further set forth in Article IV of this chapter. Any requests for reconsideration shall be governed by JCC 18.40.310. The responsible official's DNS may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner by the applicant or anyone commenting on the environmental impacts of the proposal(as further set forth in JCC 18.40.810). The appeal must be in writing, in conformance with JCC 18.40.330, and be filed within 14 calendar days after the threshold determination is issued as set forth in subsection(4)of this section. Appeals of environmental determinations under SEPA, shall be consolidated with any open record hearing on the project permit. (See RCW 36.70B.110(6)(d)). A notice of appeal shall be delivered to the Administrator by mail or by personal delivery, and must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the last business day of the appeal period,with the required appeal fee of$995.00. The notice of appeal shall contain a concise statement identifying: • The decision being appealed and the identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal; • The name, address, and phone number of the appellant and his/her interest in the matter; • Appellant's statement describing standing to appeal(i.e.,how he/she is affected by or interested in the decision); • The specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appellant shall bear the burden of proving the decision was wrong; • The desired outcome or changes to the decision; and • A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, signed by the appellant. Any slice of app., t in full compliance with this Section shall not be considered. A _/ S f/27- /2-0/9. p Stacie Hoskins, SEPA 'es onsible Official Date LOG ITEM MLA13-00088 NOSC Application Page 3 of 3 LOG G -E WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. Page _ ( f rT 2) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21 C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write "do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project 2. Name of applicant:North Olympic Salmon Coalition 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison St Port Hadlock WA 98368 (360)379-8051 4. Date checklist prepared:6-15-13 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule{including phasing,if applicable): Waterline construction: Spring/Summer 2014 Shoreline Restoration construction Summer/Fall 2014 Olympic Discovery Trail Construction: Pending funding, the trail can be constructed simultaneously with either of the above components or independently after the above components. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. LC C:= b T F Wetland Delineation Page Habitat Management Plan P 6 of Section 7 ESA Compliance 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. JARPA application submitted to DOE,DNR,WDFW,USACOE,Jefferson County Franchise Agreement with WSDOT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. WSDOT-Franchise agreement DOE-CZMA consistency determination,NPDES Construction stormwater permit,401 Water Quality Certification DNR-Aquatic Use Authorization WDFW-Right of entry,HPA USACOE-Nationwide Permit, DAHP-section 106 USFWS-ESA consultation-Section 7 Jefferson County-SEPA determination,critical areas review,utility permit,shoreline substantial development permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline. The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill.These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem processes. Specific elements of the proposed restoration include: 1. Remove armor and restoring a more natural beach profile along an abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. 2. Restore tidal circulation to a currently-enclosed freshwater pond and wetland(Cherry Pond) 3. Remove fill from the mouths of 4 small tributary streams that flow into the project area. 4. Remove a creosoted timber railroad bridge(also called trestle). 5. Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate between the lagoon and the mill pond. (1-5 see Maynard Shoreline Restoration, NOSC, 100%Design Set) 6. Relocate residential waterline that was located within the railroad grade. 7. Construct a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail atop the waterline alignment in the restoration project segment. (6,7 see Waterline Replacement Project, 90%Design Set) 2 8. Removal of 1700 feet of Railroad grade and 3 associated railroad trestle bridges between and around Inter and 05i4 Creek 9.Removal of sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek 9 See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project, NOSC, 100%Design Set) Page 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Discovery Bay,Jefferson County Washington.Located near the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 20 on the West Side of the bay.No street address.In the NW quarter of Section 24,T29N,RO2W.The project site is linear in fashion,refer to the attached site plan(Figure 3)to best understand the project extent.Topography is available on the attached plan sets. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 30% 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY M c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, (` muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. F'dge._ 6._. At the restoration sites and at the trail site the soil is fill material that is sandy gravelly in nature. The Highway right of way for much of the length of the waterline is fill which is sandy gravelly borrow. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO ICI e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill material will be used to build a trail prism within the DOT right of way.This would be gravel borrow material from a local pit or the adjacent restoration area with quantities estimated at 5000 CY. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Erosion would be limited to post construction in area where the shoreline has been restored to a more natural state.These sections are designed to"deform"where sediment from one area may transport to another area naturally along the shoreline.There is no infrastructure in these areas of the project and such deformation is a project goal and not detrimental. Erosion is not expected during or post construction on the trail and waterline components of the project.These components have been designed NOT to erode during or after construction as they hold infrastructure intended to be longstanding. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? The Jefferson County Department of Community Development Stonmwater Calculation worksheet was used in creating this estimate. Due to the unique nature of this project and project site these calculations are not straightforward, so explanation of methods follows. Site size was determined by adding the size of the parcels on which restoration will take place, and the highway right of ways adjacent to waterline and/or trail developments. Site size is 59.7 acres. Existing impervious surface on the site includes only Highway 101, and is estimated at13.3%. New impervious surface from the project results only from the construction of the trail,and is estimated at.7%. Taken together these result in approximately 14%of the site being covered in impervious surface. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: During construction BMP's will be used to prevent erosion of soils via wind or water. Attached plansets include Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control elements to be installed by the construction contractor. Post project, exposed soil will be seeded 4 and strawed with native grasses. Reinforced slopes will be treated with geotextiles during construction and seeded. Slopes adjacent to trails will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Spoils piles at the Maynard Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project sites will be seeded and strawed and planted with native trees and shrubs. Planting plans are included (Figures 4,5,6). ;° " a. Air �age of a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and exhaust associated with heavy equipment moving earth are expected.These quantities are difficult to quantify. We would expect construction to take approximately 3 months total for all aspects of the project.Given that most of the construction site is adjacent to highway 101 there are already significant emissions in the area and the increase caused by the project will therefore be minimal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: If the site appears to be generating dust,water trucks will be used to stop this. 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including LA '<. r F year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type# and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. �� , a.The restoration sites are bordered by Discovery Bay for their entire length. g ���J Q f 0 3 b. Restoration work will take place at the mouth of Snow Creek,Type"S",Salmon Creek Type"F'. c.The trail will be along the shores of Discovery Bay,it crosses 4 small unnamed tributaries that currently enter the bay from adjacent highway culverts.Two of these tributaries feed into the Cherry Pond and are unmapped,though discussions with WDFW suggest the Southern stream is N and the Northern stream is type F.The two mapped tributaries in this area are also designated at Type F. d.A man made pond"Cherry Pond"is adjacent to the trail alignment and will be reconnected to Discovery Bay to become a saltwater wetland.The wetland delineation included with this application classifies the pond as a Category 11 wetland.After restoration it is expected to become a Category 1 wetland. e.A second man made pond near Snow Creek the"Snow Creek Estuary Pond"has also been classified as a Category II wetland. It will be unaltered by the project. f.Trail construction is with-in 40 feet of the shores of Discovery Bay. g.Waterline construction is within shoreline buffers at the Northern end of its extent for approximately 1500 feet. The waterline will be directionally bored and cased beneath Snow and Salmon Creeks. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Letters correspond to waterbodies listed in 1)above: a.Restoration work will be adjacent to Discovery Bay.Some work will occur below MHHW on low tide cycles. The work entails bulkhead removal,fill removal,the removal of a creosote railway trestle all to be accomplished with heavy machinery.Details included in Maynard Shoreline Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plansets. b. RR trestles will be removed from Salmon and Snow Creeks. c.The project will extend a culvert conveying a stream not designated by the Jefferson County Critical Areas maps. Discussions with WDFW inform us that it is nonfish bearing. Extension of the culvert is necessary to convey the waterline(Waterline Replacement Planset,Sheet Wl,callout at 445+00).Another unlisted culvert will be shortened by 50 feet in the Maynard Shoreline Restoration area(Maynard Shoreline Restoration Project Planset Sheet C2.2). Two box culvert sections will be placed over and adjacent to the current outfall of WSDOT Culverts(Waterline Replacement Planset Sheet W2.) d.In the northern restoration area the"Cherry Pond"a manmade Category II wetland will be modified to so that the northern creek feeding it,designated as Type F,will be connected to the shoreline by abandoment of a fish passage barrier culvert and removal of associate fills.This is returns"Cherry Pond"to near historic conditions,and it is expected become a Category I wetland.See Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plans,Sheets C 2.2,C2.3. e. Restoration grading will occur adjacent to the Snow Creek Estuary pond but is not expected to alter the character of the pond.The shores of the pond now covered by invasive species including reed canary grass,Himalayan blackbeny,and scotch broom will be cleared,planted and maintained to a establish a native plant buffer.See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plans,Sheets 3, 10.Planting plan Figure 6. 6 f. A section of the Olympic Discovery trail will be constructed approximately 20-80' from the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay.The trail prism will be set on a side slope along the DOT right of way. While much of the prism can be graded to be stable,in places it requires buttressing with a rock walls,reinforced slopes and soldier p pile walls.See Waterline and Oly Discovery Trail Plans. 7 g.Waterline construction.Where it follows the trail alignment the waterline causes no impact greater than the trai i7 „s alone.At Snow and Salmon Creek the waterline will cross beneath the creeks in directionally drilled,cased crossing.Impacts associated with the creek crossing would be a 10 foot wide construction path used in trenching for waterline hook up to the shaft.No significant streamside vegetation would be impacted by the trenching,mostly grasses and invasive weeds.The construction path would be seeded,strawed and planted with native shrubs prior to back out. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Fill removed from wetlands at Restoration Site:33,827 CY This fill material is RR grade embankments and sidecast spoils deposited on the banks of Snow Creek during past dredging projects. Fill placed in wetland for trail construction: 100 CY(154 Sq ft)This fill would be gravel borrow placed around the culvert extension to allow the trail to fit onto the highway shoulder. . 'ii Aldo e 11IvfI & 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general "ed in description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. I,uf�L1}' The tributary feeding the Cherry Pond(Restoration Plan Sheet C2.2,C2.3)will be set into a pipe and diverted from the pond.With the diversion in place the pond will be allowed to drain before the RR grade impounding the pond is removed/modified. The small tributary feeding into the South end of the Cherry Pond will be diverted when its culvert is extended.As this is a seasonal stream it may be dry during construction in which case no diversion will be required. A small tributary will be removed from the confines of a culvert as part of the shoreline restoration.The stream will be diverted during culvert removal and streambed construction. 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. Nearly the entirety of the restoration elements shown in the Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project plan set and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Planset are mapped as 100 year floodplains.No infrastructure that would be affected by flooding is being installed.The project removes bridges and drinking waterlines from the 100 year floodplain. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. NO. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. NONE. 7 LC :GJTE TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Prage___LOt EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. During construction stormwater will be infiltrated on site in much the manner it does now,with additional protections offered by TESC measures installed onsite. Post Construction stormwater will infiltrate over most of the project area in the same manner it currently does. The exception would be stormwater that falls on the trail will drain from the trail onto the adjacent slope for infiltration.The trail is being specifically designed to not direct stormwater into concentrated flow paths due to its proximity to the shoreline. Rather, stormwater will leave the downhill side of the trail evenly along its entire length for infiltration on the slope below. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No.TESC measures during construction will prevent silts from entering surface waters.There are no other waste materials expected. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: TESC measures during construction. Slope stabilization,geotextiles,coir logs,erosion control seed,straw,plantings to restore slopes post construction. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:Reviewer,noted in italics below. deciduous tree: alder,willow, cherry evergreen tree: fir Shrubs:rose,snowberry, Himalayan Blackberry,scotch broom, Grass:pasture grasses in uplands, salt grass on estuary surfaces pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: Lyngby Sedge, Pacific Silverweed, Picklweed,Salt Grass, Bull Rush, water plants: other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project removes 656 2-6"alders, 110 6-10"alders,and 9 12-16"alders that are growing on the dredge spoils along the banks of Snow Creek.These trees will be replaced by naturally recruiting salt marsh community that is natural at the site. Approximately 10 acres of rr grade and associated uplands infested with invasive species will be cleared during the restoration.Where subtidal these areas will recruit native saltmarsh vegetation,where upland the areas will be planted in a native shrub/tree community. The Olympic Discovery Trail is being designed to avoid impacting shoreline trees.A few conifers and up to 10 alders may need to be removed to facilitate trail construction.The trail will also remove 18,360 sq/ft of grass in the highway right of way and areas of Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. The waterline project disturbs grasses,Himalayan blackberry and scotchbroom over 2 acres. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 8 • 7 d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: The slope below the trail will be replanted with native grasses and trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Maynard Nearshore Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Subtidal areas where grading takes place will not be replanted as salt marsh species surround the site and will quickly recruit to the new ground. The waterline area of impact will be replanted in grasses and strawed. Planting plans are included in Figures 4,5,6. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds, wading birds,waterfowl,sea birds mammals: deer, otter, raccoon, rodents fish: salmon, trout, herring,surf smelt,surfperch,sturgeon,sculpin,shellfish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Threatened:Hood Canal Summer Chum,Puget Sound Steelhead,Puget Sound Chinook,Marbled Murrelet(Adjacent Waters) Endangered: Southern Resident Killer Whale(adjacent waters designated critical habitat) 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Em The project is part of the Pacific Flyway,and important migration route for migratory birds. The site is used by migrating adult and juvenile salmon. of—� d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: The project is driven by restoration,most project elements are designed to increase the usefulness of the area to wildlife. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. The completed project will have NO energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. • NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. Equipment used to construct the project will burn diesel fuel,and will be required to use vegetable oil hydraulic fluid, this creates the possibility of a spill,or the equipment could malfunction and catch fire. A septic drain field will be decommission and removed during the project. l)Describe special emergency services that might be required. None reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Proposed measures to red :Y Contractors will be required to have a spill kit in all active work areas to address the potential for spills. b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Traffic noise from highway 101 is prevalent at the site,especially the trail and waterline construction areas. 10 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise would consist of heavy equipment operation noise during weekday work hours from 8-5. Lk G Fags 0 11 Y TPAA TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR r dQe_43 o'1L AGENCY USE ONLY 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Work restricted to week days and hours 8-5. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. Given the proximity of Highway 101 to the project additional heavy machinery noise will be neglible. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Waterline and trail alignments are on a highway Right of Way.Restoration areas are public lands owned by the Washington Depai Intent of Fish and Wildlife.These public lands receive low levels of public visitorship from folks looking to recreate on the property by fishing,hunting,walking,birding or boating. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 4 Creosote railroad trestles are on the project site. 2 Defunct sheds are on the project site I buried waterline is on the project site. 1 septic drain field is on the site d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? The 4 creosote RR trestles will be removed The 2 defunct sheds will be removed. The waterline will be abandoned and removed during site excavations. The septic drain field will be abandoned if an alternate system is constructed.If abandoned,it may be abandoned in place or dug out. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural residential 1:5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural residential 1:5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project takes place along shorelines designated"Suburban".The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project is bordered to the North and West by shorelines designated"Natural",to theEast by shorelines designated"Conservancy/Natural",and to the South by shorelines designated"Suburban". 12 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Much of the project borders wetlands which have been delineated in the attached wetland delineation. It occurs adjacent and along a marine shoreline. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Zero. ae0 �g j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: LC 11-FM N/A Page_12._of 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? None proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: NA 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NA c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None 14 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: NA _a 2-3 II 15 LC ITEM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT of� EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreation in the area is informal.The area is lightly used for outdoor recreation pursuits including fishing,bird hunting,shell fish harvest,passive recreation and boating. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No.The project increases recreational opportunities and access along the shoreline including the development of a section of a regional trail. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: NA 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: NA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The site is accessible from the Hwy 101 shoulder.There are no formal access points planned as a part of this project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, .25 mi. c. flow many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking is provided or eliminated by the project. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No 16 LC -A PageoL 17 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate whe peak volumes would occur. " . ' 1p 4-11,4 Increase tourism draw at the site may draw 2-3 vehicles per day. rage ) of 7;3 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: None needed. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. NA 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv- ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. Waterline and septic system currently exist onsite,they are not"available"for any further hook-ups. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project will install a private water utility in the DOT right of way via typical construction methods. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: /' ; r‘-‘3 Date Submitted: - <S' /3 18 LC ,p P-FM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR ''age AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air; pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? The project is not likely to increase these things. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? The proposal is likely to positively affect plants,animals,fish and marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: The project not only protects and conserves these resources by the use of BMPs during construction, its actions restore habitat and ecological processes in the area that are impaired and currently negatively impacting these resources. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? It wouldn't. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NA 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? The proposal to provide positive impacts to these items. The removal of the RR grade may be viewed as some as altering a historic site. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: There are plans to include and interpretive sign about the old RR grade on sections that will not be removed,to tell the history of the area. 19 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal may increase recreational use of the shoreline.It would not encourage incompatible use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: �111,71 None t, 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal is unlikey to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with these requirements. 20 /Co - )4-/ /7t2.,s . 9z- (4v/ntine fcKL o� 190 e/tryt _vrcat:( 51-vL_ 1/0--YL 0 1,-/r), r- dse/ �r�7 pi-eled4- 3fP rvjceJ- .,� LOG IT Donna Frostholm From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:59 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: ODT base map Attachments: Fig1 Trail.pdf Hi Donna, Apologies again for my absent mindedness. LOG ITI4 Good meeting, please find discussed map attached. Eric Eric Kuzma,Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@cojefferson.wa.us Web:www.cojeferson.wa..us/publicworks 1 LOG ITEM /5-- Fit4of o N m n 9 Z 4 ',W m T m A a£ °o irQ9X oo OLD GARDINER RD . �, .ate 7) ., 434÷00 (101) ��O O2 �- Z > r-4 _a (n I' Q. D m 2 = D zi m co v C � O y 61 2 3 Z 0 r O y a = D t 0 459+00(101) _ N Ti Z l° m 0m * m m s m m ZZC) —1 W7, p Z O -< Z Z m m co co m m A N Z 0 -i ca m O N 0 0�10ck Lg'V � /- ' co o O o� p „ iv 0 3 ., :2 -0 o� C 0 5. 0 s C gi w Donna Frostholm LOU , l . gI From: Linda Atkins Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:42 AM --- _ To: Donna Frostholm Cla Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 �--° The only thing I have is the response from Kevin but I think he gave that you to all first and I have copies. If not let me know and I'll get them to you. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CoAFIDE1TIALITY,VOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. bider the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56 From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:01 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Thanks for the conditions. Do you have any written communication with NOSC or state agencies that could be included in the project file (for the hearing examiner to review)? If so, send copies my way. From: Linda Atkins Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:53 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Susan Porto Subject: RE: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Donna, Sorry for the delay. My comments are as follows: General for all portions of the project: . , C • Water lines shall be located a minimum of 10' from all septic components. lo...)X'/" • Prior to completion and final signoff of this project the water line replacement approved by WDOH under ODW Project#13-0702 shall be signed off as complete by WDOH and construction drawings submitted to WDOH. Confirmation from DOH required. • Sewage effluent transport lines shall be protected from vehicular traffic and disturbance. • Any soils moved offsite shall be disposed of at an approved permitted location. 1 For the Snow Creek Estuary portion of the project: • No land disturbing activities that result in the presence of surface water within 100' of the existing drainfield easement serving the motel owned by Walter Moa shall take place for a minimum of 1 year after the onsite sewage system stops receiving effluent or testing shows less than 30 cfu/100m1 enteric bacteria per the 2012 EPA guidelines for recreational waters. For the Maynard Shoreline portion of the project: • Soils to be excavated should be screened for contamination prior to being placed either onsite or offsite. The number of samples needed will be dependent upon the volume removed.See the chart below and https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/1009057.pdf. PARAMETER ANALYTICAL YES/NO METHOD Total Metals (RCRA 8) EPA #6010 TCLP Metals (RCRA 8) EPA #1311/6010 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons WTPH-HCID, WTP1-1 Modified, WTPH-G or WTPH-D Volatile Organics EPA #8010 (Halogenat Semi-volatile Organics EPA #8270, 8310 (PAI PCB's EPA #8080, 8140 TCLP Volatiles & Semi Paint Filter Test EPA #9095 1111 ,E A g EPA #9040, 9045 (soil) RECOMMENDED SAMPLING NUMBER OF SAMPLI i FREQUENCY VOLUME (cubic yards) 0 - 25 2 T-f2 26 - 100 3 .. :;:: 101 - 500 5 501 - 1000 7 A,LA�A , �, 1001 - 2000 10 s'/ J One (1) additional sample for eve 500 cubic yards of material over misi yards. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its 2 contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42:56 From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:22 AM To To: Linda Atkins L O Subject: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Importance: High rh...• 0L3 Linda: Sorry to keep pestering you but I am at a crucial point in permitting. I cannot move forward with the SEPA Threshold Determination or the staff report for the hearing examiner without a copy of the written information for the waterline portion of the project and an email from you that includes the EH conditions for the waterline. Just so you know, if I do not have the EH info by this Friday, 1/17, in all likelihood, I will have to cancel the hearing scheduled for this project in February. Let me know if you have any questions. Dawvux/Fro-}thalvw .associate Planner/'WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrostham@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 3 LOG m. F /13 Donna Frostholm c '� I of From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 1:57 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Discovery Bay application - MLA13-00088 Attachments: NWS-2013-109 Response 9-11-13.pdf; Response Figures.pdf Donna, At 445+00 on sheet W1 the culvert extension is where the fill takes place.The fill is the culvert and associated fill material, and it takes place in the stream channel, not in the wetland. I called this a wetland fill in the application, I don't know if this is technically incorrect as it is outside the boudaries of the Cherry Pond wetland. I apologize for the confusion, technically this fill in the in the wetland buffer for the Cherry Pond. The fill has undergone review at the USACOE as the stream channel lands in their jurisdiction. I have attached correspondence regarding this culvert extension for your reference. The corps has issued us a permit that allows the culvert extension. I understand Jeffco may also need to weigh in. Hopefully this information allows you to do so. Kevin From: Donna Frostholm [DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 11:54 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: Discovery Bay application - MLA13-00088 Take care Kevin—I hear there is an extremely nasty bug going around now. Hope you feel better soon. Thanks you for the clarification below—it is a really big project so sorry I missed that part of the submittal. I have another question for you. The reports and the environmental checklist make reference to 100 cy(154 sf)of fill in the wetland for trail construction, but the fill lines on the Parametrix sheets show the fill line above the OHWM and I do not see the delineated wetland boundary on the W sheets. Did you mean fill will be placed in the wetland buffer? If fill will be placed in the Cherry Pond wetland,would you let me know the station number on the Parametrix sheets that correspond to wetland fill for the trail? Thanks. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanagerOnosc.orq] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 10:23 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Discovery Bay application - MLA13-00088 Donna, I have those dates on our calendars. We are aware we will need to post the notices. Regarding your question it was addressed in the Jarpa. Section 7j introduces it.Then on page 12 paragraph 6 goes into more detail. Any material that leaves the site would be hauled to a site that is permitted for receipt of such material. Bidders on the project will need to demonstrate a properly permitted site during the bid process. Because the material is sandy/gravelly pit run material it is quite useful and I'd suspect most bidders will plan to stockpile it in their yards or gravelpits for reuse, of course they'll still need to demonstrate that the use of these areas is permitted. Hope that helps. I am sorry for my slow response. I have had a terrible flu, and now I am flat on my back with back pain, so I'm not exactly 100%, but I am committed to getting you what you need as quickly as possible. Thanks, Kevin Long NOSC I From: Donna Frostholm [DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] LOG ITEM Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 2:21 PM r To: Kevin Long :✓ Subject: Discovery Bay application - MLA13-00088 j; r Kevin: I am shooting for this application to go to public hearing in February. There are two Tuesdays that the Hearing Examiner will be here: February 11 and February 25. Hearings are at 2:00 at the Jefferson County Courthouse. Please reserve both of those times and confirm that you (and/or any other NOSC representatives on this project)would be available at either of those times for the hearing. Also, remember that someone from NOSC would need to be available to post the notices of public hearing in the project area when I have the noticing packet ready(about 2 weeks prior to the hearing). I know that you would prefer to have the hearing sooner rather than later, and will try to make it happen. Please reserve the latter date just in case. As I dive into this a bit more, I may have more questions. Here is the first one: if materials from the restoration area cannot be used to build a trail prism within the WSDOT ROW, how will the materials be disposed of? Regards, Donna.Frog-holm/I/ .associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrostham@cajefferson.wa.us 360.3794466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 NORTH OLYMPIC L(4 NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION Restoring wild salmon habitat on the North Olympic Peninsula www.nosc.org SALMON LOG ITEM COALITION .4i l f3 r. Of 9-11-13 Tina, I have copied your August 29th inquiry on NWS-2013-109 NOSC(waterline)below and answered in italics. I have performed additional site survey and included that information on hand drawings. I hope this submittal meets your needs. 1. For the stream culvert extension on Sheet 2 of 5,where does this stream flow into? Into a roadside ditch or directly into a creek? The culvert empties into a short"stream channel"before entering into a freshwater impoundment we call the "Cherry Pond". The stream channel is little more than a depression in the landscape. Please provide an enlarged drawing of the area to show where the 30 sf of channel impacts are located. Will this impact be fill,excavation,or backfill? The impact will be excavation and backfill with culvert bedding and 16'of precast concrete 18"culvert. Because the culvert alignment does not align with the outfall channel(as depicted on the drawing)the channel excavation and backfill occurs in only a small part of the channel, but the entire channel will be abandoned by the new pipe. Wetland delineation flags are still onsite,and the new pipe alignment does not cross onto any wetlands. On the drawing,clearly show the OHWM of the stream in relation to the existing and proposed culvert. For reference, please use the example drawings I sent you for the trail culverts.See the next page for this drawing. Please also show in the drawing the location of the diversions during construction. There is an inset below the drawing of a diversion plan. This stream is dry most of the year and we hope to be fortunate enough to be there when there are no flows. If there is a trickle we will block the trickle at the upstream end of the culvert with plastic and sandbags during work as work is only anticipated to last a couple of hours.At the end of work any impounded water would be slowly release through the extended culvert to avoid stirring up sediment at the downstream end. If flows are high enough that this approach is not feasible I propose sandbagging a smaller diameter PVC pipe into the culvert outfall so that flows travel in this pipe and through an energy dissipater before being released to the pond. This would allow us to install the waterline beneath the culvert alignment and place pipe bedding with the stream diverted out of the work area. During culvert extension placement this pipe will be threaded through the new sections of culvert as they are placed.At the end of the process the PVC would be pulled and the stream would travel in the new culvert. 2. As required by NWP Regional General Condition 5,you must submit the following information for this culvert(similar to what you submitted for the trail culverts): a. Need for the crossing. We need to extend this non fish bearing culvert in order to place a waterline beneath it. Currently the waterline would be need to be trenched in very near the outfall. This is a risk to the line and a risk to water quality. b. Crossing design criteria and design methodology. The current crossing adequately conveys the seasonal flows of this non fish bearing stream so we propose to extend it at a similar alignment and slope for 16'. 205 B West Patis on Street, Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 I phone: 360.379.8051 fax: 360.379.3558 email: info@n osc.o r 9 c. Rationale behind using the specific design method for the crossing.Because of the small and seasonal nature of this stream rigorous design methodologies were not used. If the stream simulation design method is not used to design the proposed watercourse crossing,you must include justification for utilizing a different method.The stream simulation design method can be found in the"Fish Passage Technical Assistance Design of Road Culverts for Fish Passage" (see www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/engineer/cm). If you have a Hydraulic Project Approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,they can typically provide you with the crossing design criteria and methodology they utilized as part of their review. I have consulted with Margie Schirato at WDFW and she said that because this is an extension of a non fish bearing culvert no crossing design criteria or methodology were considered during their HPA review process. LOG ITEM Thank you, wr Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B West Patison Street, Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 I phone: 360.379.8051 fax: 360.379.3558 email: info@nosc.org LOS ITElvi O. K - Cult' d- ij[f-n51" " , 9 i r of -1 N/ I I , Z 4,41 01 1 Propo -eXtesicw‘ I6, LF ��a����t,+ /�. 3o Sf Ui Lh'o-nn�I imPp. 4 bill) occ,u✓' wh.orL f-hc cvlver-4 )eit-cs■04,1 0114P-1040 0 11 14, 1 I t,v<2/.. 1,(z... ,1 F-4 0041 81 V��+atc� I LX�S, Irq T • • • • • 4,r J _ Qvo-dSidL I �G(� ��, 0 'fc� Lvtverf 4-4 "G /leery / G)- -Crow, GXISi_Il I cvrve,t ou#/(( fo Pant eot,/e 3 U 7 / Culver+ OZ ve.,+-5101 / I I / 110.-5 0.-►'e._ eres.e,4- yr; (_c,,54-r.,c f ion, A. 5 rr0 lIGY 4 _ p c,-^ 4-he_ new t f ,si p; f .'s fa If Pik 13 ,(;. i „! 4k ury r' °iss t Po-4e ./ i tp m � o 2 2 w A r+ i LOG i-! M to i A ' c a 0 3 2 kT. 0 3 a i 00 0 i 3 • tti et 3 O C s C O2 G O O Q 4 C cs t + t 4 F o + to � a Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 1:38 PM To: Linda Atkins LOG !TENS Subject: NOSC application MLA13-00088 Importance: High Of Linda: I am trying to finalize the draft staff report and log in the case file by Friday. Please provide me with any written communications you have had for this project(including those with the state for the waterline), and your conditions for approval of the waterline. For the conditions,send me an email with the language that you would like added to the staff report(do not add conditions to TM since this is a Type Ill process). I am hoping to get this ready for internal review and a hearing, so if it is at all possible, please give me conditions and information for the case file by Thursday. Thanks much, Davu/.o('Fros-thoLvw Associate PCanner/WetCandSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port 7 nvnsencC Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojeffers(m.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 2:22 PM To: Kevin Long Li T Subject: Discovery Bay application - MLA13-00088 Pao [ of Kevin: I am shooting for this application to go to public hearing in February. There are two Tuesdays that the Hearing Examiner will be here: February 11 and February 25. Hearings are at 2:00 at the Jefferson County Courthouse. Please reserve both of those times and confirm that you (and/or any other NOSC representatives on this project)would be available at either of those times for the hearing. Also, remember that someone from NOSC would need to be available to post the notices of public hearing in the project area when I have the noticing packet ready(about 2 weeks prior to the hearing). I know that you would prefer to have the hearing sooner rather than later, and will try to make it happen. Please reserve the latter date just in case. As I dive into this a bit more, I may have more questions. Here is the first one: if materials from the restoration area cannot be used to build a trail prism within the WSDOT ROW, how will the materials be disposed of? Regards, Donna.Frost-holm/1i .Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,-Washington 98368 dfrostriant@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm v liA Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:57 PM LOG 3 TE1 To: 'Kevin Long' c ' Cc: Linda Atkins; Rebecca Benjamin; Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: comments for mla13-00088 ' `�� � Kevin: The hearing examiner has 2 weeks to make his decision,and permits are generally issued the day after DCD receives the decision. DCD also sends a copy of the shoreline permit to Ecology. You will get a letter from Ecology stating that the project should not begin within 21 days. The 5 weeks I mentioned below is about permitting process requirements in the Jefferson County Code, and not about the number of comments received. There are a number of steps at my end to prepare for a hearing that have to occur based on timeframes in the code. Please remember at the pre-application meeting, I said that Jefferson County is understaffed and that it is likely going to take about 8-9 months to issue the shoreline permit. We are on track for meeting(or possibly beating)the timeframe I estimated at the pre-app. I am well aware of your intent to begin in March and I am moving the application along as quickly as I possibly can. Also, please remember that a building permit is required for some portions of the project. You may want to consider submitting the building application prior to receiving the shoreline permit if you are concerned about permitting timeframes. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager@nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:24 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Linda Atkins; Rebecca Benjamin; Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: comments for mla13-00088 Donna: Once the hearing is done how long until a permit is issued? 5 weeks to prepare for the hearing seems like a long time given the minimal comments received from agencies or the public on the project.We are under the gun to get the waterline portion of this project to construction.Jefferson Counties permitting process has been extremely slow.The slowest of any agency contacted with the project JARPA including the US Corps of Engineers. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 1 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:45 PM To: Kevin Long �,O Eldl Atkins Cc: Linda .1.t. 0 Subject: RE: comments for mla13-00088 0E171 9- of Hi Kevin: The only comments are from DoE, Linda, and me. It is my understanding that Linda may have more questions so I have copied her on this email—she can confirm if she needs more information from you (if so, please copy me so I have your responses in the project file). Once all EH questions have been addressed,we can schedule the public hearing. I will need approximately 5 weeks to prepare for the hearing. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist From: Kevin Long[mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:04 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: comments for mla13-00088 Hi Donna, Find attached my response to your questions. Please let me know if you need more clarification or if I need to bring hard copy(s)of this response by your office. It would be helpful for me if you could explain for me the next steps in the process are and the associated timeline. When will the public hearing be?Will I receive all public comments from the Public Notice period?The only comments I saw were from DOE. Thank you for your attention to this project, Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 8:44 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: comments for mla13-00088 Kevin: Here are my comments on the proposed restoration,waterline re-location, and Olympic trail application: 1. There are references to waterline bridges and references to HDD of the waterline. Are bridges still a part of the application? If so, have the plan sheets been prepared for the bridges? 2. The wetland delineation report included Cherry Pond. Was Dixie asked to check Maynard Pond for wetlands? 3. The Habitat Management Plan makes reference to Table 1,which was not included in the report. For areas to be upland areas to be planted with native species, provide Table 1 and a map showing the location of areas to be replanted. 2 Let me know if you have any questions, Do u/av Frosthoi vw LOG ! 0 EM Associate Tanner/Wetland Specialist 4d j0 Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment `� 621 Sheridan Street XAr , � of Port'rownsenc‘-Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4.466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 3 Donna Frostholm From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:04 PM -OG ITE To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: comments for mla13-00088 39 Attachments: Response to DCD Questions 12-16-13.pdf �e�40f Hi Donna, Find attached my response to your questions. Please let me know if you need more clarification or if I need to bring hard copy(s)of this response by your office. It would be helpful for me if you could explain for me the next steps in the process are and the associated timeline. When will the public hearing be?Will I receive all public comments from the Public Notice period?The only comments I saw were from DOE. Thank you for your attention to this project, Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 8:44 AM To: Kevin Long Subject: comments for mla13-00088 Kevin: Here are my comments on the proposed restoration,waterline re-location, and Olympic trail application: 1. There are references to waterline bridges and references to HDD of the waterline. Are bridges still a part of the application? If so, have the plan sheets been prepared for the bridges? 2. The wetland delineation report included Cherry Pond. Was Dixie asked to check Maynard Pond for wetlands? 3. The Habitat Management Plan makes reference to Table 1,which was not included in the report. For areas to be upland areas to be planted with native species, provide Table 1 and a map showing the location of areas to be replanted. Let me know if you have any questions, Donna.F rastho imv .associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 LOG IT E:_ TO: Donna Frostholm,Jefferson County DCD FROM: Kevin Long, North Olympic Salmon Coalition RE: MLA 13-00088 Comments 12-16-13 Hi Donna, I have copied your questions below and provided answers in blue italics. Please feel free to give me a call if I've missed the mark on my response to your questions. Thank you, Kevin Long 1. There are references to waterline bridges and references to HDD of the waterline. Are bridges still a part of the application? If so, have the plan sheets been prepared for the bridges? Waterline Bridges are no longer planned for the project. 2. The wetland delineation report included Cherry Pond. Was Dixie asked to check Maynard Pond for wetlands? If by "Maynard Pond"you are referring to the embayment to the North of Cherry pond, this is a saltwater lagoon connected to Discovery Bay. Project actions will not impact this body of water. 3. The Habitat Management Plan makes reference to Table 1,which was not included in the report. For areas to be upland areas to be planted with native species, provide Table 1 and a map showing the location of areas to be replanted. The reference to table one is a typo. The list of species is instead spelled out in the sentence following the reference to the table. Table 1:Species to be Planted Spacing Douglas fir 10'centers Shore Pine 10'centers Snowberry 5'centers Nootka Rose 5'centers Madrone 10'centers Maps showing the location of the plantings were included with the JARPA form as Figures 4, 5 and 6. They are included here again with and overview map denoting where the figures are in Discovery Bay. Directional drilling will occur well outside of the stream buffers. The Highway Right of Way in these areas will be reseeded with grass and not planted with shrubs and trees so a planting plan is not included for those areas. 3 'r FIGURE 5: Olympic Discovery Planting g K FIGURE 4: Maynard Nearhore Planting 4 y�t f @ rr f FIGURE 6: Snow Creek■Riparian Planting itA SALMON CO0.11n0n L is Discovery Bay Restoration: Planting Locatio#s age ofJ 41 4 Figure 4 Malnard Shoreline, Plan-Einn Plan 14 4 8 t DoutikifiR 0 ,rY 15Mdj Soi(S �+h a need for salt ",' S bore,Pine, -fo(erance.1"rees will be.&t IO f-S �n 4 x ai+h noo4kQ rose Qlanled bet eert t, -Ft. �`` `^ ibmiarses tsioo+k& g Pianis will likely need to be uttlereA OPT tra ( and invaSives niar�t$ained. A few ' D i 11o,cicone 10' width .modrona witl be Plaflled initially to 1 15044. See The sticeeSS rale.on 411i sue. -y ft .' r; • , 4• pond C r, .4 t , . mss . . ;a} �.; I ti ii Y 01 ' I. . -t. 1.0 ' ''''''' ' ICI . 1411 - - C3 „I. `� - • 1 , `;• 7-i' - „ k # -*"' r L $ t a 411111 —. :0 " * t.t OG 11"E',;., 9 , "F f' 9 age of 5- lr A .. V, �( . x see. in se{- 1 Ptan1it r •r, al Sough Doyk '�-Z4-Zvi' .... 4 . r Figure 5 .a It, i is.... I I , r, _ _ , 3 3 It ' hi 4 14 A Page I •11. 1••% . C5 I Ct. f W Ni ej:11 W. 1 NAttrt 410 -1. I \--.8 te-14-nr..A...--) t... ,.. '41,40161 e If r# tir .1 01. b .,, 413% 744 '. Itt ' - • 0 0 / °/, 4/ 1 * w ' ite 4 ,44 4 1 ‘,44re.,,,, sa 11 40 t`■‘°.s,, .,,, Aci 0 0 .• . _ few _,tea y of I December 16, 2013 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 282023 HWY 101 MLA#: MLA13-00088 Dear STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WOLF: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff has reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and has determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of Community Development Staff c: File NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION KEVIN LONG 205 B W PATISON ST PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 41,W,V 6/ Tv:1(A , Blain F : : Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] ,I Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:32 PM To: Mary Blain Subject: RE: N• • • ••.. :- --• :: - Thes are the parcels involved,in the project: 9022.005, 964516003, 90223'1'004\ , 964516903, 90224304. •a 2044, 9022%3033, 902L43020, 902243cf48. It appears to answer your questions AND -•• ••= rcel that was no Inc u•e• • • - -- •n. I just left you a way too long message re: the building projects to help you find them in the Waterline Plan Set. These elements are only to 50% design so there is not a lot of information there. Please inform me if this is an appropriate level to submit for building permits or if we need to hold off on the building permit until we have further design accomplished. I do not want to waste anyones time or our money! I will be on vacation next week. But if you want to call me today or tomorrow call my cell at 301-9251. I am also happy to stop through your office at your convenience. Thank you, LOG ITE 3'7 Kevin Long@ Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Mary Blain [mailto:mblain @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:10 PM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Kevin, I was looking over some of the paper work, looking for plans and I noticed that I don't'think I have the correct/or all of the parcel numbers involved in the case. The numbers were very hard to read on the Master Application. I have: 964516003 902231004 964516903 902243046 902243044(which was entered twice on the Master Application, maybe another number by mistake?) 902243020 902243048 There seems to be another parcel that is missing a number.9022X4055,which I need completed. I want to make sure I'm entering all the information correctly. 1 902141007 � �*Illit'�I *90213100: 902142001 902141009 902133012 902132001 902141008 fgli '��I 902131007` 101 902144001 D D ������� 902144003 902142001 902133012 �D ,DDD ��� 902144002 2 ' - -' 902133005 %�� 902144005 902144007 '�� D D ■ .•\ 902,43007 la D D D '.,.;,.`902,44006 D D D ,► ,,IDD • 902143008 -_ 902144008 I� <.�:D �` �. 902232003 , '``.� O���', 902232003 , D .�i �,� 902231005 IUD D� -•G' `' LOG ��`�. . . 902232004 I��DD�! "".: 902232002 902231024 902232005 902231006 a ?114# ��902232006 902231007 ��'t�,.® 90224303A `,0 902234005 D , ..-- 4. 41r•X2234006 902243042 ` 90224' Q 902232002 902232001 r 3001 02234007 902233002 902233005 f P11 902244001 902244001 902244001 902233014 . 902234016 4 902233004 4 902233006 902234001 ' \� 902233011 , 902244001 902233007 i 902233010 902244001 90224 902233008 902244001 902261004 902234001 1 902252002 902251006 902251 902262004 902262002 902252003 I 02261001 902261001 A 902251007 902251 I 902261001 902252014 - 902251001 902262003 \902252021 902261005 902261009 902251002 902263002 902252013 902264040 , 902263002 902264040 90226404" 902253009 902264002 I 902264040,` 902253003 902254002 9022540 AUTHENTICATED U.S.GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO 11- "I i §60.2 44 CFR Ch. I (10-1-10 Edition) or knowledge of conditions that re- (d) Communities identified in part 65 quire, particularly for human safety, of this subchapter as containing more higher standards than the minimum than one type of hazard(e.g., any com- criteria set forth in subpart A of this bination of special flood, mudslide(i.e., part. Therefore, any flood plain man- mudflow), and flood-related erosion agement regulations adopted by a hazard areas) shall adopt flood plain State or a community which are more management regulations for each type restrictive than the criteria set forth of hazard consistent with the require- in this part are encouraged and shall ments of§§60.3,60.4 and 60.5. take precedence. (e) Local flood plain management [41 FR 46975,Oct.26,1976.Redesignated at 44 regulations may be submitted to the FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR State Coordinating Agency designated 44552, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984] pursuant to §60.25 for its advice and compliance with flood concurrence. The submission to the §60.2 Minimum com P State shall clearly describe proposed plain management criteria. enforcement procedures. (a) A flood-prone community apply- (f) The community official respon- ing for flood insurance eligibility shall sible for submitting annual or biennial meet the standards of§60.3(a) in order reports to the Federal Insurance Ad- to become eligible if a FHBM has not ministrator pursuant to §59.22(b)(2) of been issued for the community at the this subchapter shall also submit cop- time of application. Thereafter, the ies of each annual or biennial report to community will be given a period of six any State Coordinating Agency. months from the date the Federal In- (g)A community shall assure that its surance Administrator provides the comprehensive plan is consistent with data set forth in§60.3(b), (c), (d), (e)or the flood plain management objectives (f), in which to meet the requirements of this part. of the applicable paragraph. If a com- (h) The community shall adopt and munity has received a FHBM, but has enforce flood plain management regu- not yet applied for Program eligibility, lations based on data provided by the the community shall apply for eligi- Federal Insurance Administrator. bility directly under the standards set Without prior approval of the Federal forth in §60.3(b). Thereafter, the corn- Insurance Administrator, the commu- munity will be given a period of six nity shall not adopt and enforce flood months from the date the Federal In- plain management regulations based surance Administrator provides the upon modified data reflecting natural data set forth in§60.3 (c), (d), (e) or (f) or man-made physical changes. in which to meet the requirements of [41 FR 46975, Oct.26, 1976.Redesignated at 44 the applicable paragraph. FR 31177, May 31, 1979, as amended at 48 FR (b) A mudslide (i.e., mudflow)-prone 29318,June 24,1983;48 FR 44552,Sept.29,1983; community applying for flood insur- 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984; 50 FR 36024, Sept. 4, ance eligibility shall meet the stand- 1985; 59 FR 53598, Oct. 25, 1994; 62 FR 55716, ards of §60.4(a) to become eligible. Oct.27,1997] Thereafter, the community will be given a period of six months from the §60.3 Flood plain management criteria date the mudslide (i.e., mudflow) areas for flood-prone areas. having special mudslide hazards are de- The Federal Insurance Administrator lineated in which to meet the require- will provide the data upon which flood ments of§60.4(b). plain management regulations shall be (c) A flood-related erosion-prone based. If the Federal Insurance Admin- community applying for flood insur- istrator has not provided sufficient ance eligibility shall meet the stand- data to furnish a basis for these regula- ards of §60.5(a) to become eligible. tions in a particular community, the Thereafter, the community will be community shall obtain, review and given a period of six months from the reasonably utilize data available from date the flood-related erosion areas other Federal, State or other sources having special erosion hazards are de- pending receipt of data from the Fed- lineated in which to meet the require- eral Insurance Administrator. How- ments of§60.5(b). ever, when special flood hazard area 204 ._4..A.30 ITE _ Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS §60.3 designations and water surface ele- plumbing, and air conditioning equip- vations have been furnished by the ment and other service facilities that Federal Insurance Administrator, they are designed and/or located so as to shall apply. The symbols defining such prevent water from entering or accu- special flood hazard designations are mulating within the components dur- set forth in§64.3 of this subchapter. In ing conditions of flooding. all cases the minimum requirements (4) Review subdivision proposals and governing the adequacy of the flood other proposed new development, in- plain management regulations for cluding manufactured home parks or flood-prone areas adopted by a par- subdivisions, to determine whether ticular community depend on the such proposals will be reasonably safe amount of technical data formally pro- from flooding. If a subdivision proposal vided to the community by the Federal or other proposed new development is Insurance Administrator. Minimum standards for communities are as fol- in a flood-prone area, any such pro lows: posals shall be reviewed to assure that (a) When the Federal Insurance Ad- (i) all such proposals are consistent ministrator has not defined the special with the need to minimize flood dam- flood hazard areas within a commu- age within the flood-prone area, (ii) all nity, has not provided water surface public utilities and facilities, such as elevation data, and has not provided sewer, gas, electrical, and water sys- sufficient data to identify the floodway tems are located and constructed to or coastal high hazard area, but the minimize or eliminate flood damage, community has indicated the presence and (iii) adequate drainage is provided of such hazards by submitting an appli- to reduce exposure to flood hazards; cation to participate in the Program, (5) Require within flood-prone areas the community shall: new and replacement water supply sys- (1) Require permits for all proposed tems to be designed to minimize or construction or other development in eliminate infiltration of flood waters the community, including the place- into the systems;and ment of manufactured homes, so that (6) Require within flood-prone areas it may determine whether such con- (i) new and replacement sanitary sew- struction or other development is pro- age systems to be designed to minimize posed within flood-prone areas; or eliminate infiltration of flood wa- (2) Review proposed development to ters into the systems and discharges assure that all necessary permits have from the systems into flood waters and been received from those governmental (ii) onsite waste disposal systems to be agencies from which approval is re- located to avoid impairment to them quired by Federal or State law, includ- or contamination from them during ing section 404 of the Federal Water flooding. Pollution Control Act Amendments of (b) When the Federal Insurance Ad 1972,33 U.S.C. 1334; ministrator has designated areas of (3) Review all permit applications to special flood hazards (A zones) by the determine whether proposed building sites will be reasonably safe from publication of a community's FHBM or flooding. If a proposed building site is FIRM, but has neither produced water in a flood-prone area, all new construc- surface elevation data nor identified a tion and substantial improvements floodway or coastal high hazard area, shall (i) be designed (or modified) and the community shall: adequately anchored to prevent flota- (1) Require permits for all proposed tion, collapse, or lateral movement of construction and other developments the structure resulting from hydro- including the placement of manufac- dynamic and hydrostatic loads, includ- tured homes, within Zone A on the ing the effects of buoyancy, (ii)be con- community's FHBM or FIRM; structed with materials resistant to (2) Require the application of the flood damage, (iii) be constructed by standards in paragraphs (a) (2), (3), (4), methods and practices that minimize (5) and (6) of this section to develop- flood damages, and (iv) be constructed ment within Zone A on the commu- with electrical, heating, ventilation, nity's FHBM or FIRM; 205 Page §60.3 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-10 Edition) (3) Require that all new subdivision ties to ground anchors. This require- proposals and other proposed develop- ment is in addition to applicable State ments (including proposals for manu- and local anchoring requirements for factured home parks and subdivisions) resisting wind forces. greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, which- (c) When the Federal Insurance Ad- ever is the lesser, include within such ministrator has provided a notice of proposals base flood elevation data; final flood elevations for one or more (4)Obtain,review and reasonably uti- special flood hazard areas on the com- lize any base flood elevation and munity's FIRM and, if appropriate, floodway data available from a Fed- eral, State, or other source, including designated other special fl000d od a hazard data developed pursuant to paragraph areas without base flood elevations on (b)(3) of this section, as criteria for re- the community's FIRM, but has not quiring that new construction, sub- identified a regulatory floodway or stantial improvements, or other devel- coastal high hazard area, the commu- opment in Zone A on the community's nity shall: FHBM or FIRM meet the standards in (1) Require the standards of para- paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(5), (c)(6), graph (b) of this section within all Al- (c)(12), (c)(14), (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this 30 zones, AE zones, A zones, All zones, section; and AO zones, on the community's (5) Where base flood elevation data FIRM; are utilized,within Zone A on the corn- (2) Require that all new construction munity's FHBM or FIRM: and substantial improvements of resi- (i) Obtain the elevation (in relation dential structures within Zones A1-30, to mean sea level) of the lowest floor AE and All zones on the community's (including basement) of all new and FIRM have the lowest floor (including substantially improved structures, and basement) elevated to or above the (ii) Obtain, if the structure has been base flood level, unless the community floodproofed in accordance with para- is granted an exception by the Federal graph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, the ele- Insurance Administrator for the allow- vation (in relation to mean sea level) ance of basements in accordance with to which the structure was floodproofed,and §60.6(b)or(c); (iii) Maintain a record of all such in- (3) Require that all new construction formation with the official designated and substantial improvements of non- by the community under §59.22 residential structures within Zones Al- (a)(9)(iii); 30, AE and All zones on the commu- (6) Notify, in riverine situations, ad- nity's firm(i)have the lowest floor(in- jacent communities and the State Co- eluding basement) elevated to or above ordinating Office prior to any alter- the base flood level or, (ii) together ation or relocation of a watercourse, with attendant utility and sanitary fa- and submit copies of such notifications cilities, be designed so that below the to the Federal Insurance Adminis- base flood level the structure is water- trator; tight with walls substantially imper- (7)Assure that the flood carrying ca- meable to the passage of water and pacity within the altered or relocated with structural components having the portion of any watercourse is main- capability of resisting hydrostatic and tained; hydrodynamic loads and effects of (8) Require that all manufactured buoyancy; homes to be placed within Zone A on a (4) Provide that where a non-residen- community's FHBM or FIRM shall be tial structure is intended to be made installed using methods and practices watertight below the base flood level, which minimize flood damage. For the purposes of this requirement, manufac- (i)a registered professional engineer or tured homes must be elevated and an- architect shall develop and/or review chored to resist flotation, collapse, or structural design, specifications, and lateral movement. Methods of anchor- plans for the construction, and shall ing may include, but are not to be lim- certify that the design and methods of ited to, use of over-the-top or frame 206 Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS §60.3 construction are in accordance with ac- (7) Require within any AO zone on cepted standards of practice for meet- the community's FIRM that all new ing the applicable provisions of para- construction and substantial improve- graph (c)(3)(ii) or (c)(8)(ii) of this sec- ments of residential structures have tion, and (ii) a record of such certifi- the lowest floor (including basement) cates which includes the specific ele- elevated above the highest adjacent vation (in relation to mean sea level) grade at least as high as the depth to which such structures are number specified in feet on the commu- floodproofed shall be maintained with nity's FIRM (at least two feet if no the official designated by the commu- depth number is specified); nity under§59.22(a)(9)(iii); (8) Require within any AO zone on (5) Require, for all new construction the community's FIRM that all new and substantial improvements, that construction and substantial improve- fully enclosed areas below the lowest ments of nonresidential structures (i) floor that are usable solely for parking have the lowest floor (including base- of vehicles, building access or storage ment) elevated above the highest adja- in an area other than a basement and cent grade at least as high as the depth which are subject to flooding shall be number specified in feet on the commu- designed to automatically equalize hy- nity's FIRM (at least two feet if no drostatic flood forces on exterior walls depth number is specified), or (ii) to- by allowing for the entry and exit of gether with attendant utility and sani- floodwaters. Designs for meeting this tary facilities be completely requirement must either be certified floodproofed to that level to meet the by a registered professional engineer or floodproofing standard specified in architect or meet or exceed the fol- §60.3(c)(3)(ii); lowing minimum criteria: A minimum (9)Require within any A99 zones on a of two openings having a total net area community's FIRM the standards of of not less than one square inch for paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4)(i) and every square foot of enclosed area sub- (b)(5)through(b)(9)of this section; ject to flooding shall be provided. The (10) Require until a regulatory bottom of all openings shall be no high- floodway is designated, that no new er than one foot above grade. Openings construction, substantial improve- may be equipped with screens, louvers, ments, or other development(including valves, or other coverings or devices fill) shall be permitted within Zones provided that they permit the auto- Al-30 and AE on the community's matic entry and exit of floodwaters. FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that (6)Require that manufactured homes the cumulative effect of the proposed that are placed or substantially im- development, when combined with all proved within Zones A1-30, All, and AE other existing and anticipated develop- on the community's FIRM on sites ment, will not increase the water sur- (i) Outside of a manufactured home face elevation of the base flood more park or subdivision, than one foot at any point within the (ii) In a new manufactured home community. park or subdivision, (11)Require within Zones All and AO, (iii) In an expansion to an existing adequate drainage paths around struc- manufactured home park or subdivi- tures on slopes, to guide floodwaters sion,or around and away from proposed struc- (iv) In an existing manufactured tures. home park or subdivision on which a (12) Require that manufactured manufactured home has incurred"sub- homes to be placed or substantially im- stantial damage" as the result of a proved on sites in an existing manufac- flood, be elevated on a permanent foun- tured home park or subdivision within dation such that the lowest floor of the Zones A-1-30, AH, and AE on the com- manufactured home is elevated to or munity's FIRM that are not subject to above the base flood elevation and be the provisions of paragraph (c)(6) of securely anchored to an adequately an- this section be elevated so that either chored foundation system to resist (i) The lowest floor of the manufac- floatation collapse and lateral move- tured home is at or above the base ment. flood elevation,or 207 0 §60.3 44 CFR Ch. I (10-1-10 Edition) (ii) The manufactured home chassis waters of the base flood, without in- is supported by reinforced piers or creasing the water surface elevation of other foundation elements of at least that flood more than one foot at any equivalent strength that are no less point; than 36 inches in height above grade (3) Prohibit encroachments, includ- and be securely anchored to an ade- ing fill, new construction, substantial quately anchored foundation system to improvements, and other development resist floatation, collapse, and lateral within the adopted regulatory movement. floodway unless it has been dem- (13)Notwithstanding any other provi- onstrated through hydrologic and hy- sions of §60.3, a community may ap- draulic analyses performed in accord- prove certain development in Zones Al- ance with standard engineering prac- 30, AE, and AH, on the community's tice that the proposed encroachment FIRM which increase the water surface would not result in any increase in elevation of the base flood by more flood levels within the community dur- than one foot, provided that the corn- ing the occurrence of the base flood munity first applies for a conditional discharge; FIRM revision, fulfills the require- (4) Notwithstanding any other provi- ments for such a revision as estab- sions of §60.3, a community may per- lished under the provisions of §65.12, mit encroachments within the adopted and receives the approval of the Fed- regulatory floodway that would result eral Insurance Administrator. in an increase in base flood elevations, (14) Require that recreational vehi- provided that the community first ap- cles placed on sites within Zones A1-30, plies for a conditional FIRM and AH, and AE on the community's FIRM floodway revision, fulfills the require- either ments for such revisions as established (i) Be on the site for fewer than 180 under the provisions of §65.12, and re- consecutive days, ceives the approval of the Federal In- (ii) Be fully licensed and ready for surance Administrator. highway use, or (e) When the Federal Insurance Ad- (iii) Meet the permit requirements of ministrator has provided a notice of paragraph (b)(1) of this section and the final base flood elevations within elevation and anchoring requirements Zones A1-30 and/or AE on the commu- for "manufactured homes" in para- nity's FIRM and, if appropriate, has graph(c)(6)of this section. designated AH zones, AO zones, A99 A recreational vehicle is ready for zones, and A zones on the community's highway use if it is on its wheels or FIRM, and has identified on the corn- jacking system, is attached to the site munity's FIRM coastal high hazard only by quick disconnect type utilities areas by designating Zones V1-30, VE, and security devices, and has no per- and/or V,the community shall: manently attached additions. (1) Meet the requirements of para- (d) When the Federal Insurance Ad- graphs (c)(1) through (14) of this sec- ministrator has provided a notice of tion; final base flood elevations within (2) Within Zones V1-30, VE, and V on Zones A1-30 and/or AE on the commu- a community's FIRM, (i ) obtain the nity's FIRM and, if appropriate, has elevation (in relation to mean sea designated AO zones, AH zones, A99 level) of the bottom of the lowest zones, and A zones on the community's structural member of the lowest floor FIRM, and has provided data from (excluding pilings and columns) of all which the community shall designate new and substantially improved struc- its regulatory floodway, the commu- tures, and whether or not such struc- nity shall: tures contain a basement, and (ii) (1) Meet the requirements of para- maintain a record of all such informa- graphs (c) (1) through (14) of this sec- tion with the official designated by the tion; community under§59.22(a)(9)(iii); (2) Select and adopt a regulatory (3) Provide that all new construction floodway based on the principle that within Zones V1-30, VE, and V on the the area chosen for the regulatory community's FIRM is located landward floodway must be designed to carry the of the reach of mean high tide; 208 �- ' ITE. 'qe Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS §60.3 (4) Provide that all new construction (ii)The elevated portion of the build- and substantial improvements in Zones ing and supporting foundation system V1-30 and VE, and also Zone V if base shall not be subject to collapse, dis- flood elevation data is available, on the placement, or other structural damage community's FIRM, are elevated on due to the effects of wind and water pilings and columns so that (i)the bot- loads acting simultaneously on all torn of the lowest horizontal structural building components (structural and member of the lowest floor (excluding non-structural). Water loading values the pilings or columns) is elevated to used shall be those associated with the or above the base flood level; and (ii) base flood. Wind loading values used the pile or column foundation and shall be those required by applicable structure attached thereto is anchored State or local building standards. to resist flotation, collapse and lateral Such enclosed space shall be useable movement due to the effects of wind solely for parking of vehicles, building and water loads acting simultaneously access, or storage. on all building components. Water (6) Prohibit the use of fill for struc- loading values used shall be those asso- tural support of buildings within Zones ciated with the base flood. Wind load- V1-30, VE, and V on the community's ing values used shall be those required FIRM; by applicable State or local building (7) Prohibit man-made alteration of standards. A registered professional en- sand dunes and mangrove stands with- gineer or architect shall develop or re- in Zones V1-30, VE, and V on the com- view the structural design, specifica- munity's FIRM which would increase tions and plans for the construction, potential flood damage. and shall certify that the design and (8)Require that manufactured homes methods of construction to be used are placed or substantially improved with- in accordance with accepted standards in Zones V1-30, V, and VE on the corn- of practice for meeting the provisions munity's FIRM on sites of paragraphs (e)(4) (1) and (ii) of this (i) Outside of a manufactured home section. park or subdivision, (5) Provide that all new construction (ii) In a new manufactured home and substantial improvements within park or subdivision, Zones V1-30, VE, and V on the commu- (iii) In an expansion to an existing nity's FIRM have the space below the manufactured home park or subdivi- lowest floor either free of obstruction sion,or or constructed with non-supporting (iv) In an existing manufactured breakaway walls, open wood lattice- home park or subdivision on which a work, or insect screening intended to manufactured home has incurred"sub- collapse under wind and water loads stantial damage" as the result of a without causing collapse, displace- flood,meet the standards of paragraphs ment, or other structural damage to (e)(2) through (7) of this section and the elevated portion of the building or that manufactured homes placed or supporting foundation system. For the substantially improved on other sites purposes of this section, a breakway in an existing manufactured home park wall shall have a design safe loading re- or subdivision within Zones VI-30, V, sistance of not less than 10 and no more and VE on the community's FIRM than 20 pounds per square foot. Use of meet the requirements of paragraph breakway walls which exceed a design (c)(12)of this section. safe loading resistance of 20 pounds per (9)Require that recreational vehicles square foot (either by design or when placed on sites within Zones V1-30, V, so required by local or State codes) and VE on the community's FIRM ei- may be permitted only if a registered ther professional engineer or architect cer- (i) Be on the site for fewer than 180 tifies that the designs proposed meet consecutive days, the following conditions: (ii) Be fully licensed and ready for (i) Breakaway wall collapse shall re- highway use, or sult from a water load less than that (iii) Meet the requirements in para- which would occur during the base graphs (b)(1) and (e) (2) through (7) of flood;and, this section. 209 .„„ rp: §60.4 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10-1-10 Edition) A recreational vehicle is ready for (iii) Using the higher elevation from highway use if it is on its wheels or paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of this sec- jacking system, is attached to the site tion require the standards of para- only by quick disconnect type utilities graphs (c)(1) through (14) of this sec- and security devices, and has no per- tion. manently attached additions. (6) For all substantial improvements (f) When the Federal Insurance Ad- to existing construction within Zones ministrator has provided a notice of AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AH, AR/AO, and final base flood elevations within AR/A: Zones Al-30 or AE on the community's (i) Determine the Al-30 or AE, All, FIRM, and, if appropriate, has des- AO, or A Zone base flood elevation;and ignated AH zones, AO zones, A99 zones, (ii)Using this elevation apply the re- and A zones on the community's FIRM, quirements of paragraphs (c)(1) and has identified flood protection res- through(14)of this section. toration areas by designating Zones (7) Notify the permit applicant that AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AH, AR/AO, the area has been designated as an AR, or AR/A,the community shall: AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AH, AR/AO, or (1) Meet the requirements of para- AR/A Zone and whether the structure graphs (c)(1) through (14) and (d)(1) will be elevated or protected to or through(4)of this section. above the AR base flood elevation. (2)Adopt the official map or legal de- [41 FR 46975,Oct.26,19761 scription of those areas within Zones AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AH, AR/A, or EDITORIAL NOTE:For FEDERAL REGISTER ci- AR/AO that are designated developed tations affecting §60.3, see the List of CFR Sections areas as defined in §59.1 in accordance Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume lume with the eligibility procedures under and on GPO Access. §65.14. (3) For all new construction of struc- §60.4 Flood plain management criteria tures in areas within Zone AR that are for mudslide (i.e., mudflow)-prone designated as developed areas and in areas. other areas within Zone AR where the The Federal Insurance Administrator AR flood depth is 5 feet or less: will provide the data upon which flood (i) Determine the lower of either the plain management regulations shall be AR base flood elevation or the ele- based. If the Federal Insurance Admin- vation that is 3 feet above highest adja- istrator has not provided sufficient cent grade;and data to furnish a basis for these regula- (ii) Using this elevation, require the tions in a particular community, the standards of paragraphs (c)(1) through community shall obtain, review, and (14)of this section. reasonably utilize data available from (4) For all new construction of struc- other Federal, State or other sources tures in those areas within Zone AR pending receipt of data from the Fed- that are not designated as developed eral Insurance Administrator. How- areas where the AR flood depth is ever, when special mudslide (i.e., mud- greater than 5 feet: flow) hazard area designations have (i) Determine the AR base flood ele- been furnished by the Federal Insur- vation;and ance Administrator, they shall apply. (ii) Using that elevation require the The symbols defining such special standards of paragraphs (c)(1) through mudslide (i.e., mudflow) hazard des- (14)of this section. ignations are set forth in §64.3 of this (5) For all new construction of struc- subchapter. In all cases, the minimum tures in areas within Zone AR/A1-39, requirements for mudslide (i.e., mud- AR/AE,AR/AH,AR/AO,and AR/A: flow)-prone areas adopted by a par- (i) Determine the applicable ele- ticular community depend on the vation for Zone AR from paragraphs amount of technical data provided to (a)(3)and(4)of this section; the community by the Federal Insur- (ii) Determine the base flood ele- ance Administrator. Minimum stand- vation or flood depth for the under- ards for communities are as follows: lying A1-30, AE, All, AO and A Zone; (a) When the Federal Insurance Ad- and ministrator has not yet identified any 210 Donna Frostholm From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] LOG Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 2:31 PM ci To: Donna Frostholm; Linda Atkins i Subject: Response to Linda Atkins review ' f ` / _o f Attachments: Discovery Bay Permit Response 1.pdf Hi Donna, Linda, Find attached digital copy of the response to Linda's questions and a SEPA review comment. I will be dropping hard copy off today. Thank you, Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 1 OG11' . Page o of To: Donna Frostholm,Jefferson County DCD From: Kevin Long, North Olympic Salmon Coalition Re: Comments received to date on Discovery Bay Restoration Project permit application to DCD December 5, 2013 Donna, I met with Linda Atkins about the Discovery Bay Restoration project.She had some questions that you will see reflected below with a response.We have also received one SEPA comment that we have addressed here. Per your request I am submitting 3 copies through you to be distributed to your permit reviewers. Thank you, Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 1)Question from Linda Atkins:I'm trying to determine how the project will or will not change the extents of MHHW in the area close to the septic system. On the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Design set,sheet 8, where is MHHW in relation to the existing ground and in relation to the proposed surface? Please refer to Sheet 11 in the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration plan set.The top figure 1.11 is a typical cross section across the estuary surface. (If you look back at sheet 8,you will see the 1.11 is actually called out as the cross section for the area on the top right)This figure indicates that MHHW is elevation 6.38'. It also indicates that the new marsh surface will be excavated to elevation 6.5'to 7', higher than MHHW.All excavation in the area will not allow the MHHW line to go any nearer the septic system than it currently does.The only location where the MHHW line will change is where tidal channels are excavated.Sheet 8 shows that constructed tidal channels will come within 150 feet of the railroad grade toe.Current conditions are such that an existing tidal channel/stream channel, labeled "Groundwater Spring Channel",on sheets 8 and 9,currently intersects the railroad grade and actually passes through it under a trestle bridge.The distance from this channel to the railroad grade toe is therefore 0 feet.This is depicted on sheet 8 along the matchline to sheet 9.A portion of it also appears on sheet 9. ITE, 33 ""��� Page ®f 2)Question from Linda Atkins:Demonstrate the location of the Jafay septic field. Which side of the driveway is it on? Plans on file at the County SEP93-00281 show the field is 570 feet from the tank in front of the second train car from the north.A sheet from this record is included below. From the highway 101 right of way, NOSC was able to see the septic tank lid/riser in front of the second train car from the north.The highway right of way, parallels the property and the septic transport line alignment as indicated by the as builts in SEP93-00281. Measuring north along the highway right of way from this tank the distance to the near edge of the driveway is 553 feet,the distance to the far side of the driveway is 564 feet. County records indicate the septic field start at 570 feet which is clearly on the N side of the driveway.This area has been identified to me by previous owner Crystal Bonney and current owner Kurt Jafay as the septic site location. Project plans do not call for the modification of the shorelines in this area that would cause surface waters to come any closer to this system than existing conditions.The driveway may be used for construction access.This still needs to be negotiated with the property owner. If the driveway is used for equipment access the contract specifications require the contractor to lay down steel plate on the driveway to protect the septic transport line during site ingress/egress. I have indicated the approximate location of the septic field on the design sheets for the area. I have also indicated the measurements taken parallel to the septic effluent line from the visible tank lid in front of the 2nd train car from the North to the access driveway and to 570'.They are attached. 3)SEPA Comment:FLOODPLAINS MANAGEMENT:Donovan Gray re:floodplain development permits The only portion of the project that modifies an existing floodplain is the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project. Project engineer Chad Krofta has spoken with Jefferson County about the issue and has drafted a letter to address this concern which is attached. # EE of --------- -----z . . 1...0 pi il . / '12 .. 0 A.. _......,4„...,.. _ / 1 mor, R." , / . , / e ..... „ 0 . ... ,. 4, 1 • .z. i .1 ,......a... / li, / .."C)LS 4.0 k kgirt%4 CSA1 AA U0 RAT'S / . . • eau,..,ntn.uluorQ.0 vn*v..twwwr SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION C1!8 A III1 IID'AS BUILT A...q ..nc.Hr....c AiKLIKISSEMILKUI J1}ar.r... KA.11;s owrww.e a .uC....411.S11 t 211 QY•�1 � M "-) nm.*.keoun M auk too.....NK i.Yy.Hal.Av wryer.wnl.f..vWA.w- OW.,....Mr M.w.......HwrMA•M K.IY.N.wa.Woo Unto MW Wt OK.Sus HVY 101 EAST _ / ..--- D....`.....r... �.. _. ....... r te, __.. 1 M..-Sw. 'E.R.C W K.. , ICJ p.ta/MPSwr 1.1.8 FIRST TWO 1....S WU r2... _ --.,�, &.wv,TUO C..00 V.V.. /Av.S r +�i/��.\� T THE-NA()TAUS IS A PM G.uoy n....Y\/ I tl E Pyq C.AMS4t.Au-TAyC!was cO.Kb. Y V OISCOVEFY BAY M�o FLATS 1Le, - of ....ru.:.Pena..Li.O.x.S.....R+o..,....w.....;.0 au101 is mota e....me p}'.a.s.Nun ml On...Os KOOK A.pm*oaf Ir.WAG t•N •—�L__i ,• _�_ i' I 1 I ; II 1 6 a CV CV 91 I 1 9 E'TJ133NS3NIlH3 w p.I2t.. F(,� u..tr'a 9 8I° n U . a s s si¢s1s;s a•s I 1 ilk' III ! I I ' ( 1 t 1�� ��a _ a / j • e ; z `1111 it31i ill i`1s' - U / I a � z O .0. V i ! t o Z / �� � 9'-RS�n R88�9 Qa '' / _ II- 1,, > i . i ¢ £ k _ = az u,Q o I I o, 8 28 $ 1 tW s, 1a`- sEa22Rk ■•■R?n CO— w ..?""‘i-... 1i ! r' \'r Wit' I 1 'i a I i 1 iii o ,get„ 1 O ft,, I 1a, i t 1 1 //�� ITE- O , y O. mS<, I 43. 6 :c5 f ^ . rZ 4 w '1 5 ' JG w « N .! i 1 60 ' o � � w # �" a 3 o c I , a Z rua rage of_S - < ,_ . . i 0 h II d I :4 II i 2,' '‘„, 1 i : ,'' --- I 1.\- ', n, ,g6-• I! lg . li 12; , , — 1 g o qi b5e. II, . „,,,,-:,: .„,,_.: Iii i .� — _ > .....\ \ 42„ , RCN.:.• O 111' \ \ n'-'' : ;*.iL s rI a ,M ' Q z t o Igi s �' 11307ZSIE. 1 M` ■ 1 J S €Z e 2 4 1s g a 6" Q _Q Maud J_ prig c . f.I , ICan 'v V S Oi 2! O N F E G O S O > bjg N MgM H1 `\ ` T ' � ♦ g o 8 r ! a ' 1-,2”i: ,,, i.,,i ;gix,r7 '11: -:::s. '''-:— � � W k 8 G 9 W g t 1P1 I 11 li 16 n Fe Al' ,'' ! :: 1,...... m c :777:• ` I �"i J t . 4'M / i ../ . 1) e 1 s s�S \ " , . <, _ ...;00%r'/.. . / UV....Jo : II� g 5! 1 , 1...!.9- ! g - y � o a MATf714NE SNEET Q.t e R -a. 'ANLM+1.1 Ny3 A•31311GO.E MC Al xb AM 1 d. .r3+a .8f i -1 AMA ‘,1.81) CardR/ no ENTX December 2,2013 Shaping the Future Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Cardno ENTRIX Subject: MLA 07-00572 Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project 801 Second Ave. Suite 700 To Whom It May Concern: Seattle,WA 98104 USA I am the engineer responsible for the preparation of the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project design Phone 206 239 0104 plans. The purpose of this letter is to address questions relating to the impact of the proposed project on Toll-free 800 368 7511 the FEMA base flood elevation in accordance with Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15. Figure 1 depicts Fax 206 269 0098 the effective FEMA FIRM for the project area which maps much of the project area within Zone Al. The www.cardno.com proposed project will not result in an increase of the FEMA base flood elevation for the following reasons: www.cardnoentrix.com • The project proposes to remove approximately 26,000 cubic yards of fill material from the floodplain to a disposal location located outside of the floodway. Therefore,more volume will be available for conveyance within the floodway. Thus,flood elevations should decrease. • The project proposes to remove 3 low bridge structures and associated flow constrictions. Therefore, flood elevations should decrease. (� • Flooding within the project area is due to tidal influx from Discovery Bay. The proposed project , Gjv; cannot increase the elevation of the incoming tide. �r 55 Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Llge Sincerely, Chad Krofta, P.E. Design Engineer Direct Line 206.239.0278 Email:chad.krofta @cardno.com s 1 ill' f g2 till/ II 0 '-'1..1 2 t. sa Q a IA.,- tip` 69 yr lVi , —J' iTE ill is 111 ;13 ^� ' ii - .P j n fr b u Ige : w • D! i b To q yC Gy�Ne s;y 1, ci <3 N y rf y FX g E €o1.1;iec i; ia -i:fr i !Ili 93 a A 'g n z-2 a` Of f I t, r ig a 3 Sit S3 y1J4 S%t iigi ;i. .....d . .W u r X it! E{ 9 .3 q b w 'd. q $ - ' a O r il 3- d $RS E o Sg z , - J X ., c . LL 6 . -e,le C ¢ x § , s e € d f s z A e §m ` N4 s , �g ws a r2 §_ y i $ $ s= c� - a i y et 1 9 "a �} gg o . 2 a „y„ $ d3 g $ m= m»• $ Y w S a s i < i • uv> .. rS a'E : '12 V n ♦ a > :3i r 3=,:', ,r, } CV I u N w ... --r.--, ( C) e , J a '�' `g I re M V NA. / -- - 1 W o `BSI \ , , _ i+ \Y � \ L oJ W ✓� ~� o '; v 1 �, . I� w -- G �"�s ��. W I G . r U . W \" d z L w y P u i 'V y..� I'1 n AY'a • To: Donna Frostholm,Jefferson County DCD �' `� �' `� From: Kevin Long, North Olympic Salmon Coalition Re: Comments received to date on Discovery Bay Restoration Project permit application to DCD LOG IT E, December 5, 2013 ge / rt Donna, I met with Linda Atkins about the Discovery Bay Restoration project.She had some questions that you will see reflected below with a response. We have also received one SEPA comment that we have addressed here. Per your request I am submitting 3 copies through you to be distributed to your permit reviewers. Thank you, Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 1)Question from Linda Atkins: I'm trying to determine how the project will or will not change the extents of MHHW in the area close to the septic system. On the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Design set,sheet 8, where is MHHW in relation to the existing ground and in relation to the proposed surface? Please refer to Sheet 11 in the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration plan set.The top figure 1.11 is a typical cross section across the estuary surface. (If you look back at sheet 8,you will see the 1.11 is actually called out as the cross section for the area on the top right)This figure indicates that MHHW is elevation 6.38'. It also indicates that the new marsh surface will be excavated to elevation 6.5'to 7', higher than MHHW.All excavation in the area will not allow the MHHW line to go any nearer the septic system than it currently does.The only location where the MHHW line will change is where tidal channels are excavated.Sheet 8 shows that constructed tidal channels will come within 150 feet of the railroad grade toe. Current conditions are such that an existing tidal channel/stream channel, labeled "Groundwater Spring Channel", on sheets 8 and 9, currently intersects the railroad grade and actually passes through it under a trestle bridge.The distance from this channel to the railroad grade toe is therefore 0 feet.This is depicted on sheet 8 along the matchline to sheet 9.A portion of it also appears on sheet 9. 2) Question from Linda Atkins: Demonstrate the location of the Jafay septic field. Which side of the driveway is it on? Plans on file at the County SEP93-00281 show the field is 570 feet from the tank in front of the second train car from the north. A sheet from this record is included below. From the highway 101 right of way, NOSC was able to see the septic tank lid/riser in front of the second train car from the north.The highway right of way, parallels the property and the septic transport line alignment as indicated by the as builts in SEP93-00281. Measuring north along the highway right of way from this tank the distance to the near edge of the driveway is 553 feet,the distance to the far side of the driveway is 564 feet. County records indicate the septic field start at 570 feet which is clearly on the N side of the driveway.This area has been identified to me by previous owner Crystal Bonney and current owner Kurt Jafay as the septic site location. Project plans do not call for the modification of the shorelines in this area that would cause surface waters to come any closer to this system than existing conditions.The driveway may be used for construction access.This still needs to be negotiated with the property owner. If the driveway is used for equipment access the contract specifications require the contractor to lay down steel plate on the driveway to protect the septic transport line during site ingress/egress. I have indicated the approximate location of the septic field on the design sheets for the area. I have also indicated the measurements taken parallel to the septic effluent line from the visible tank lid in front of the 2nd train car from the North to the access driveway and to 570'.They are attached. 3)SEPA Comment:FLOODPLAINS MANAGEMENT:Donovan Gray re:floodplain development permits The only portion of the project that modifies an existing floodplain is the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project. Project engineer Chad Krofta has spoken with Jefferson County about the issue and has drafted a letter to address this concern which is attached. LOG IT vt' Page 7 UG ITE ,.....-.,�j t.Z C age DEC D53 fair' a a 7 • a 1. 1"1. Z0 / ' , • a° / Qo MOP pLArs / f/ ye I E.Pr� t... i // / 2 O_ —.L._ ... L. �\ J/ 600•to.>4 4. // `T /// / /J / 1 /.I ,.$ -.. r PViNP LM+4n43R.A.• / ' _ / MOO RAT'S / •. • DENNIUMENS OP COMMONS,DEEELOPNEAM . . • ENVMOMMISMALElkALTII . • SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLATION CEirrrderlankiin AS BUILT' • Received APPLICANT NAME 1.1Almenue Crner..o.e.s,0 SEP9_,UM4.Jaiteel,4...ee.efeultLAse, Date fnetstleel - -9} o•ncEt.t.APABER q_.1r/ y _(SMAINI OM I Lot 011./Olo • Pits....Mute losstiee 0 septic lent,pesos MEMOS,drifirsAM.S.and Other system cOmporterns in mist..le the hiwna • • property lines,et elhee mrennAcm nips Tithe say Cht A pproved plans Weer on the bad of this km. • . . Ws/ 101 EAST' • — —— I A/SEA • ent.1 •Es... • OW. • • THE FIRST PW TA.ICS PRE I 250 Cosiehom.,16/0 COMPARTMer, 1.4.k 5...._ THE-no 5. TEAK 00 A 000, C.H."%a.Au-TA...KS ME am.re it • • • • • DISCOVERY DAY PA1.)0 FLATS r,`,...'1"41::n7,1"snitt■nt:7:2=2::::::::2:,5,:i,'1:W'AT:":st."'"m"" - , LOG ge of4 Path:C:IUserstswinter,appdata'Jocahlemp1AcPubtish_1 Filename:C2.x_plans Plot date:Apr 10.2013-07:07:39pm CAD User:winter. W. ? - 0 9 I'M 133HS 3NIlHD1VW 00 di o ,n o �.-G` NI D ' , ' �-^. 0 1` ' N G O C t N y= M 1 _ L J 2 i ' l p i {�r�ar. ..�< D I [ 1 {Ii0V f'f m �OSD �rN- � o D o +AZ +O i!!:-u m 'o°� r� YI n m m ''t �8 fig^ C)D NI I �. • ®a,,,11, A„,,-• nn � � Z� °I < ® �... a ��m ` 1 r` 0■ / D D Jmc _8 / . g ; t b 0 f p /o 7 Va I N p n O M C •"..;32.•?, g we A z ` // / / Mrrra.' N ' I I *g o. n __ �� V r D ` �u' ( arrr ° �. O Sy < I` el g Ss W m S x I 0 I CD =° < a A O" 3 rb o y D ) \ I se *ammonia. i O, •O I i!P <‘!, A \r O 53> _.ill aa ,O o A o ` ' a t D 1 MMaaaruMM M < CO P 5. e u N, az f f,' 1 I a.:.u.aMar - I' . O .y. O CO urn Di n 'O L Z tD r Z O D n m D 2 ' °� rMrrMMM O 0! 11 I �t O . O A A O D O m ct c x ,, r��YMrM11 'O Omo Om �m r TxrO (/) l+lea r I 7 3i mm mm mx om0O Lizm< �n ,1 \sir 1 ._-_ -* 1� 'NO y <• mA �>"c 4< 00 2$ =mm› �� r�i I: m O t7 0 Co v< p� 3� O� � 00 �_ mo ttt /'� < 0 - vOi f0 mx.n ,- m-,-1 ZN -im mm 33Op;m iz 11'\''l /��p. .r I O fD N r. -n SO Mg o 2C << OxO� c, ° :y� i i O A m� m m 12 r1 A r, I fD .•r Q- Or f<n V/ !t ` ' c • m N N m v , y ' \ r Irr!!! •m 1 a i -m 'I r O•^ :i 2 A mm p; mm 0 _0 c9 ` I�, $1 �' < / , D . S� N s ,- Nm mmprzi, `t i al .� N I C. _ t A g *5 ov zo=$ Z °1 re ';� oar , G m D z �� m0 �Ainm ! I° O `� m RI n . .- z N ., o m zm x ,q O m i��^5 Z ar err 0 0 2 ? su f < m _, - I' \ i I o <1 > 20 s ', O=4 0 bvsgli 2)B O O OT A `° D O O m m= I \.: i y, ;'i z , 'I 3 I. T < x r 1 m m `, MaC I r m - n 2 i I j' ° . m }'I °U•UU U r , ' O O,q.; m m 'a ®m £ f '? t� I ,trr rMraD //J i °n o z1.v� °z O onp Y N g, fooi m�nr r� Z� m ; gT M. __•rn. n rni>y Ill m v ma 9 0 z 0rznmm Z}zri em0 I�' ` V. al \, ` `. <.. -1 > 0/1 `` a u Txmm Mz. Tgv Mrcv ♦J 0 I \ \ ` y :::Mrr \ I NO zoz am m1 Z , v VrMaM, �� DmrD'C ymN zo o v� �b - ��� gm-, ODm mm O ° 0zez gm-, m-Iro A- .9.\ "� "" �r �`' J �/ 2rn>mD iD� OM Om "'� •NO/A �, \`, c ;-a `' DD` � `A v�ON 0o yOqOm ODm °y� \\�, `orb ... , •/ mm* ;-.10 Go. z� mn 4, \\ \ M 8. f / 9 L WM yO �� ; UI INn .nTg1 TN r5N \�\` \ rl. , V ''\ I' i �� :s moz T� O •r^i° � gt a �1 -I---- I i OA I'M m or%, ' 3 mm mg zr xr y \ m �'z ° rn� �t�\;� ( � ..., ____F 3 � \, f` i,.9Z• il a0n mggT TO xiZ x utr *�lii� ,x �1 /�i �/f I 1 i I OvvOifn 00 $-I r' A2 m-NI m t r...... t /r Yl rf , ` Dry _ f I �ll . m r zm mov nui mb Z °�n +Ji..r. ' O O y •O O r- p - m= z 0 z°D �a pj _ . _ 1 O. 7 "O • m q* OAm -4O O my-'7', t F ,, I N -mss' 3 �O ° rng_ r 1 1` 5• CD 3 O r 5z 00�y iz D 199s ' �� ' I y m yo ZD m �Z� O� o I. . . \ o /. -��\ I Q 7 n. O 2 D> zp 2OO pm m o _ I 0_ '•r W �n Or mm � m 'I }.; ®,. �-Diaa .0 m m O p Nm N z o I ;oNi 'd = a 7 m <o -Z+ 7C1c; >m rr- 4 I ,r °,z„A. O p aT O mm D �� py In I �nn5° ' H -I m= m> x m pz NN m mN V rpp L7 A-1 m c1 1 1 '� A F;sg * �^F Cf y F. A mD n� cc�77 sic ; `\ npxo • v� ,O 110 T rn 1m Ni z H I *I V b .�`.✓�\ ymo '^ fD I O Prl-2 Sr 4T. j to > mm m 2 v m m m r l '.` ,j rl r2;.:71� - 3 G. /.` - 1 A fig° �" Nr m-' I D o a I z \ ' t Z Jr �� l 1 D ` C.... y I 1 �_ t , 11 0 a u, a G a w a v m a a w N i 0 't °r� ! tv t t, m co t7 m � ° ! f B 1,' 70 i Z frt X3 G b b b b b m g b b b m 8 \`` p 0 \ O r A3 '—I S ppb m O OP a q Oi N O, N Oi 01 Z \ \ _ � � O A N ONi O V pp•, ■ n / C M a 4 m G O V W N N N N . p 2 '2 l 0.0 .\ \ \ -ti ,co D Z I • . 00cc \+ l \. -< 0) Z >. 1 r, 0 ill - ci f 4 d r"0. ' % \ {y� G {. `cg G G G G U V V G 4 U G U C7 ° i .. .s / 2$0 2 \4•�D N N # W U CO A O b L7� O D i 2.04 '- 1n N b�r 4{� it U v b N ,0 F�ir t,,, .. _ '4 r— D - P QI O, O OO, O V ,00 O N k' O, 4 ,N.f .Z7 y ' N n° '20 Z Z � o - -7,F . GI Z p v a/ Z Q N D D > 3. 3, D D D D D D m r z I I 2 O O 8 f'47 A y C 8 i 8 8 n Vu - C(1 .< 2' 2 2 2 2 2 St S S2 I 73 i r y v I r "< -1 D I:::I::: J : ' Q Q fl a C)1 n KKccCcmcCCC U o n D D D D D D D D D D D v m A I I6 £ 0 b o b n r n u v I MATCH INESHEETC2.3 I N n x x x = x x x x x = x Q i. 71 -i- — r CA.. co CD P` nr f 2 C.) Cardno ENTRIX December 2, 2013 Shaping the Future Jefferson County Department of Community Development W�G IT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 ., Cardno ENTRIX of Subject: MLA 07-00572 Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project y .� 801 Second Ave. Suite 700 To Whom It May Concern: Seattle,WA 98104 USA I am the engineer responsible for the preparation of the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project design Phone 206 239 0104 plans. The purpose of this letter is to address questions relating to the impact of the proposed project on Toll-free 800 368 7511 the FEMA base flood elevation in accordance with Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15. Figure 1 depicts Fax 206 269 0098 the effective FEMA FIRM for the project area which maps much of the project area within Zone Al. The www.cardno.com proposed project will not result in an increase of the FEMA base flood elevation for the following reasons: www.cardnoentrix.com • The project proposes to remove approximately 26,000 cubic yards of fill material from the floodplain to a disposal location located outside of the floodway. Therefore, more volume will be available for conveyance within the floodway. Thus,flood elevations should decrease. • The project proposes to remove 3 low bridge structures and associated flow constrictions. Therefore,flood elevations should decrease. • Flooding within the project area is due to tidal influx from Discovery Bay. The proposed project cannot increase the elevation of the incoming tide. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, Chad Krofta, P.E. Design Engineer Direct Line 206.239.0278 Email: chad.krofta @cardno.com ....OG 1TE:, 44 [' 2ge7 of , T li. a , . ea 40 re CR ." ! Ili ir 2 1 W ai! r i a k 1 g ztt 8=i F r: 1'111 C2 0 1 1 2 ES :' g .; ■ § I !lilt 1 ; ill ii- .41 ..... ..c......) 1 11;1 §T M ---_ .-,,----_....-- ..- --,;-,,t74::- :.7„..;-; .t- - '-44-a-- '''--2----------- 1 I sil ` ‘A igi f:Li 1 lgi*Vi's 4 X 1 XS ; - - Hi 1'14 - '4-9" .g=' I.4,4 •t2-' 1 Z,,. , .1 c tl'" i cr; 4- g . .-gl ei i 4 — re ,.); 1 V. t 1""t 1 la4 -1,1 1 ff!.4 jili-6 . t.2 [ tg r.', 3.— g -..-zsE a..- _ .,„ , >'$ 1 "-' x * a y: 3 rs1 r1 j ,s, asi.e 91) II A ''''ti', 1 i:55. g." '5..5!g r5.5'27, Fl I 4 i,I g .E. .'-22 ,L4. xi 21??-11:5 . js 1* .3';g i;, A. - , li.1.,' 1 I 5 ''.i til g'; .; 2 3 rill': !,,,t. i fi ,111 15 HI i ;:; Z I 12 --iie g . li'ail ,.:, •& 2.„ 1 i s ., si . s-4, 2 i % :j.1 2§ L314 i2119-4" 1 v§ t3 , i;t4 ; g: tu 1 1 rt e? 1.1`10.i1,2i4q11.7i:t411)11i=i i' 2 il 7i" 6, -1?-ifi- 1 - " " '2 '-IF-12 1 / 1E - 11, if 2 . 7. '<ij /3 st.g,.•vs .,•.,111-,i'iti ,,-1,—.6.-_,,. g-... ;4 i5; - ..,,.,,g ? ri < v-§ ! g -: gi ,U1 '47,,,,,: i I Ill gi i 3 ; L3 0, 1 1 .f.:11 .Lti, :z._:, ! ,,A., .f .1 <4-61.z41:2;.'i- 3 t 1 t t g2 gg g ,i st e 5 liz,.. .4..,, Fr, c,', , .41 „,, g . 2 2 i i . ■.).o>. , ,...,s \ ,ci- I 0 co te; ■ 0 c■i co ., 0 , 1 A <- ' 1 r--" m , \'',_ .. oLY.IYI . co ' I --- --......_ .rP — _ 'S. m :3 1- C.) 0. .4) • Nn, i - w ,,zaa q ' & / M a. 1 uNcAs 1 _ LT- i., ' . -I Na ---- ;":(Y ro / k + r---- .------ ' (\I 'i )% \ \7■8" "I Li- 4' , , '.5..,'' t, LIJ i •, A \ 111 \ I 0 ' \u2' \ it J \r ---' 121 \,, ) g q ii I (b- ir Donna Frostholm From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 10:03 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Rebecca Benjamin; Stacie Hoskins ,,��'j Subject: RE: comment letter �1 y / f / Donna, Thank you for the reply to my message. In the interest of getting Linda Atkins the answers she needs and getting her prompt review of my response, I will bring a package by today. I will submit another response letter upon receipt of the reviewer letter. I am very concerned that what appears to be a very slow review process by DCD could hold up construction of the project of regional significance and hope you can continue to prioritize the review of this project and specifically my response to reviewer comments.This application was submitted June 20th.A full six months for me to receive initial reviewer comments is much too long. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholmOco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 4:32 PM To: Kevin Long Subject: comment letter Hi Kevin: I got your voicemail and I will be out of the office tomorrow. Unfortunately,the soonest I will be able to get a reviewer letter to you is Friday. I apologize for the inconvenience. DCD does not issue SEPA threshold determinations until after all responses to comments have been received from the applicant. That will be issued just before we schedule the public hearing. Regards, Davmai j=rosthaLwv Associate PCanner/Wetfancl Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,-Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.3794466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 LOG ITEM Donna Frostholm }( d• �V O From: Donna Frostholm 1..4 / of 1 Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:17 AM '�—°-°W---- To: Kevin Long; Linda Atkins Subject: RE: NOSC Disco Bay Project Clarifications Hi Kevin: Please send in 3 copies. I will get back to you next week to let you know if there are any other clarifications. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist From: Kevin Long [mailto:Drojectmanager@'nosc.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:05 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Linda Atkins Subject: NOSC Disco Bay Project Clarifications Hi Donna, Linda Atkins has requested some clarifications from me for the permit review of the Discovery Bay Project.She has directed me to send those to you. I assume you'd like hard copy. How many copies? Are there other clarifications that you will be asking for from your end that I can address in the same package? Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 Donna Frostholm I [)c t ITEM From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:15 AM �..._.....� � To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: SEPA notice boards, NOSC may want to leave the boards in place as the public You can take down the notices since the comment period is up. You a a t o a p p Y p p hearing will also need to be noticed (otherwise you will have to re-install the boards when the project goes to hearing). From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager@nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:09 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: SEPA notice boards, NOSC Donna, Will you confirm the date when it is OK for me to take down the SEPA notice boards? Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:12 AM LOG ITE v To: Linda Atkins �0 • Subject: FW: NOSC Disco Bay Project Clarifications Page / of / -L Hi Linda: • Could you forward the comments you sent to Kevin on to me so I have them in project file? Thanks, Donna From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanagerftnosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:05 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Linda Atkins Subject: NOSC Disco Bay Project Clarifications Hi Donna, Linda Atkins has requested some clarifications from me for the permit review of the Discovery Bay Project.She has directed me to send those to you. I assume you'd like hard copy. How many copies? Are there other clarifications that you will be asking for from your end that I can address in the same package? Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 1 Donna Frostholm LO(3 ITEM From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:20 AM Dap To: 'Kevin Long' - .-- "—�'—° Subject: Notice Board Ready for Pickup at DCD Kevin: The noticing packet and boards are available for pickup at DCD. There are three boards and a notice packet attached to one of the boards. Please post one board on Highway 20 near the project area, and two boards at each end of the project off of Highway 101. Boards must be posted by tomorrow. I will be out of the office until 'x11:00—contact me after that time if you have questions. Davwt.cv Frotholwv .associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,-Washington 98368 dfrostfioCm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Mendoza, Sonia (ECY) [Smen461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 3:23 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Cline, Vicki (ECY); Cornett, Deborah (ECY); Gray, Donovan (ECY) Subject: ECY 13-5246 - Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project-Comments Attachments: 13-5246.pdf Importance: High Ms. Frostholm, Attached are Ecology's comments for the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project (Ecology SEPA No. 13-5246). Comments are due 11/22/13. Attached is the original final copy. ..OG Il°a_ Please reply to this message for confirmation. Thank you. 0Avder GGfendaaa e of Department of Ecology-SWRO SEPA Coordinator P:360-407-6313& F:360-407-6305 sonia.mendoza(a,ecv.wa.gov Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 1 STATg 0.4 -..'JG ®( .. 4 S ,T VV Q2 �° ®of R.4 1889 .eu STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 November 21, 2013 Donna Frostholm,Project Planner 1 Your address Jefferson inista"E is in the Community Development Department Quilcene- 621 Sheridan Street gp Sna Port Townsend, WA 98368 ■ watershed Dear Ms. Frostholm: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project(MLA13- 00088) located at 282023 Highway 101 in Discovery Bay as proposed by Kevin Long,North Olympic Salmon Coalition. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): FLOODPLAINS MANAGEMENT: Donovan Gray(360)407-7253 Work in a 100yr floodplain requires a floodplain development permit. The proponent must ensure that neighboring properties are kept reasonably safe from flooding. The watercourse alteration notification and maintenance requirements under 44 CFR 60.3(b)(6)may apply. If significant changes to the existing flood regime as shown on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRMs) are expected,the proponent must inform Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) of those changes no later than 6 months from when that information becomes available. This is usually done through the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR)process. A habitat assessment may be required per the FEMA/National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)Biological Opinion. SEPA REVIEWER: Sonia Mendoza WATER QUALITY CONTACT: Deborah Cornett(360)407-7269 Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or stormdrains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. .� � IT ' November 21, 2013 .-J Page 2 pe _le Of Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the water of the state and stormdrains draining to waters of the state or cause water quality degradation of state waters. WATER RESOURCES: Vicki Cline(360)407-0278 The proponent is responsible for inspecting the site to determine the location of all existing wells. Any unused wells must be properly decommissioned and decommission reports submitted to Ecology as described in WAC 173-160-381. This includes resource protection wells and any dewatering wells installed during the construction phase of the project. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:13-5246) cc: Vicki Cline, WR Deborah Cornett, WQ Donovan Gray, SEA Kevin Long,North Olympic Salmon Coalition (Applicant) Donna Frostholm � O ITL From: KevinL [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:48 PM > c To: Donna Frostholm age _ Of Subject: RE: OHWM OK, is there an editable Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that could be provided, the online form doesn't allow me to add any information digitally. Also, you mentioned at the site visit that significant changes to the project after a permit is issued would require starting the process over again. I want to seek some clarification on that. We want to include the construction of waterline bridges over Salmon and Snow Creek in our permit app. There is a chance we would not need to construct these as WSDOT may allow us to hang the waterline on their bridges.We will not have this determination from WSDOT before I must submit my permit app. Because we would be eliminating a permitted element I assume that would be allowable, as the result is less impact overall. True? Thank you, Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition projectmanager nosc.orq (360)379-8051 205 B West Patison St Port Hadlock, WA 98339 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholmOco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 8:49 AM To: KevinL Subject: RE: OHWM Kevin: Your project is a little bit different so there is no diffinative answer to your question. I would suggest that you use the size of all adjacent ROW and add a brief 1-2 sentence note to the form indicating how the parcel size was determined for your project. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orgl Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 1:19 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: OHWM Donna, Re: "Size of Parcel" for the Stormwater Calc Worksheet. The restoration projects are on distinct parcels so I can do this. However, the trail and water line are within the DOT right of way. There is no parcel associated with them. Should I include the size of all adjacent right of way? Or just the foot print of the waterline/trail project? In designating a "parcel size". Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanagerenosc.orq (360)379-8051 205 B West Patison St 1 Port Had lock, WA 98339 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:56 AM To: KevinL ' e Subject: RE: OHWM Hi Kevin: You are correct. Based on our discussions last week, it sounds like the OHWM could be "found" within your project area. Regards, Donna From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:33 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: OHWM Hi Donna, I wish I had this definition with me when we met.This is where I derived my impression that OHWM along marine shorelines is MHHW. Looking at this definintion again I see that is says"...where the OHWM cannot be found, OHWM adjoining salt water shall be the line of MHHW..." So, what you said is the line of salt water vegetation defines OHWM along the marine shoreline, because we can "find" this line,that is the line we should use. Correct? From the Jefferson County Code 18.25.40 Definitions "Ordinary high water(mark)" means that mark on all lakes,streams,and tidal waters that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual,and so long continued in all ordinary years,as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971,or as it may naturally change thereafter;or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by the local government or the Washington State Department of Ecology; provided,that in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found,the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide,and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water Thanks for any clarification. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition projectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 205 B West Patison St Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2 Donna Frostholm From: KevinL [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:45 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Disco Bay Pre-app Update Meeting Donna, that sounds great. I will see you at 2pm today. Thanks for the reply. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition g / proiectmanager( nosc.org (360)379-8051 205 B West Patison St Port Hadlock, WA 98339 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholmOco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:27 PM To: KevinL Subject: Disco Bay Pre-app Update Meeting Kevin: I got your message about meeting here for an update on the Disco Bay project. Does stopping by early afternoon this Thursday 11/1 work for you? If so, how about 2:00? Donna/Frog-14°4w Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialisst Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.iva.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA13-00088 -0G ITV. APPLICANT: o� North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison Street Port Hadlock WA,98339 Application Received Date:July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003, 964 516 903,Junction City BIk 160&169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report,wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, 360 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on (360) period holiday, then the comment weekend or hot p November 22,2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a Y> Comments submitted after this date may or holiday. Y not a after the Y st working day shall be extended to the fir 9 be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the applicable impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation meas ures under pp licable develo p ment regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final)determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final)SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance(MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold(final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information,please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ �0G 11: : ,, a A0 -a v O Ill ONTO Z = XJ C (nm0 -4 M 23 v ° � 0 v z 0 co w m rn TC : # I � ii oe4 1 O O W (0 > W > N 0 co r C :Z1 r73 , -'° — v,>mmt" <C tsi Pr ,.o o w 00 0 a r- Q xzr V - \. H rro my tri — I H. ��r ' m «- r' � r - 1 '° r. r a� z ra 7 , i JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA13-00088 APPLICANT: „ G IT North Olympic Salmon Coalition �. 205 B W Patison Street Port Of ° Port Hadlock WA,98339 3 Application Received Date: July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003, 964 516 903,Junction City BIk 160 &169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on November 22,2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final)determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final)SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance(MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ MMIIMIIMMI JE'A, .,-,_... V ci,,ijoje .: . 0, 4, ,•,334p. 0 .? (7-) ..e.--., 0 m a> m o 33 Z 2 cn 2 .-.----.., mo o 23. 4 z 0 z z o * c rn > 4 z S (0 • -I -0 -C C ) \u E m 1.1J N.' 11,1J 41. 9P LO \ 4 % 0\ ' If c'S kt 02c02 xl..) 00N 10 H m-ls• 73 c) .,.,. Zirrim la NI Ot Tit m1 . ON MO Z 73 > Al 1311 rl 73 0 53 0 X :".1.. I A a ....z... 0>,,,. := > O22 > -‘ o -' op : m m 0 -I" 0.) 03 L Z40 : w . : ± -; tiNtrEb x ..1-4 oH -0 ..- r....... C)" 4 . , .(.. .,.._ -- 1-4 Jefferson County Public Notices Affidavit of Publication uw 3G IC Y. ON t STATE OF WASHINGTON) e . lk SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) www•ocu,effersan.wa•us I, Donna J. Rosmaier, an employee of the Port Townsend & Jefferson . ' i . County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has been established, PUBLIC NOTICE OF published in the English language and circulated continuously as a TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDItNO weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and sER�t noN State, and for general circulation in said county for more than six (6) APPLICANT: months prior to the date of first publication of the Notice hereto North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Pelson street attached and that the said Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader Port Hadiock,WA 98339 th Application-Received Date: was on the 27 day of June 1941 approved as a legal newspaper by the July t,2013- Superior Court of said Jefferson County and annexed is a true copy of Oomplete Date: August 2$,2013 — the Ad # ,as 5 3 n Application Notice Date: October 23,2013 SITE ADDRESS Ate PROJECT LOCATN3N: 282023vHWY 101 Parcel:numbers;902 231 004,902 242 SEE ATTACHED NEWSPAPER CLIPPING 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003,964 516 9Q3, 7,11 portion of 12,Section 23,24,Township 29,:Range 2W,Highway 101,SR 20;Pair- mount Road,Old Gardiner Rat Cemetery Road,Port sand `qu' p As it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper itself not in ',$311610 n uwa IS- a supplement thereof for a period of \ week', beginning on the good'darloPment permits for Biscovery a3 day of 8c-k-b he( , 2013, ending on the a3 day of Bay and Snow Creek res ,filri O c- c be,r , 2013, that said newspaper was regularly distributed wad r PAW,e0d Tr 11, to their subscribers during all of this period. That the full amount of at the south end of DisCovery Bay and is suliect to review under SEPA The applicant $1 q .14 y has been paid in full, at the rate of$ 7.75 per column inch has subs tted a geotechn cal repcM,wetland for each insertion. delineation report,habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. OMMENT PERIOD AND lo nd sworn to before me this d ib b uscre a n/� WHERETO VIEW DOCUMENTS: Subscribed p( day of 1■1 OV Y1rYhe ( 2013 The application and any studies t may R O$ /�� be rexievred at the Jefferson County De-ir Mi4j < /`partment of Community Development. All AR y F9 ,,1 / c.�...,�+interested persons are invited to(a)com ment on the application;(b)receive'notice Do a J. Rosmaier of and participate in any hearings;and(c) 0/0112014 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at Port Townsend. receive a copy of the decision by submitting Such written comment(s}lrequest(s) to the �2 Jefferson County Department of Ca rtway G k Development,CevelopmentRev Division, U B�� C, 621 i Street,'Poll TAW d,WA 1F m,eNs 98368,(360)379-4450.Comments concern-- ingItfFis application should be subMitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m.on November 22,2013.If the last day of the comment pe- riod falls on'a weekend or holiday,then the comment period shall be extended Katie first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be oonsideredin the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197- 1-355 is being used. This may be the only;,,_. opportunity to comment on the environmental' impacts of the proposal The SEPA Official has determined that: • The optional DNS process-of WAC.197; 11-355 is being used.This may be the only opportunity to comment on the erwironmen tai 4 the proposal The OffiXement 1144/40)&141 a ONO tot this proppgal.If te'3P1'0034,131 0166 ltd per- ;ids found the'Jon minty Code acrd the J Ceunircom- pretiensi Plen will be used 10-form permit to,mitg eiadverse er1, >e or tx undery 1, .1, 1. e ,h co .... _JCS ITE d AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE -! JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 a ' e / Of / State of Washington) County of Jefferson) /4c,v Go n , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the A.3114-clay of ) rY e , 2013. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this ara day of 60.Jr6b c , 2013. Acknowledgement: O`4 A BOypi'''. Notary Public i , for the State • Washington, _ °j.•o OoAR `� residing in�vr� `c. c'� ,Washington. _ :v ��•� My commission expires: t9-t1.aO ty PUBS-�G o TgTF OF W PS�\�`�\\ NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp30_APO_U.rpt 10/18/2013p }� mil ilEC OCT 23 " ,!•'r:s JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER CASE NO. M L h i 3 boon LOG ITF CERTIFICATION OF MAILING # �.�. Page �~ s3 I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this � 20 13 2 2 day of OL+D►ie r , , I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed, true and correct copies of IV a41 C V' . tip�plc c�,ti.-I�i o� in the above matter, addressed to: /Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) "Agencies: See attached list. vitifik- Interested Parties: See attached list. / Applicant/Representative -Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, '! Posting Instruction,Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. V Newspapers (Notices Only) Y Official Posting Places (x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. Z°i3 EXECUTED this 7-day of 0 coo bar ,prat Port Townsend, Washington. IL.' Declaran I G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2012.docx 964516004 902243027 LOG ITF THOMAS R JOHNSON KENNETH R PURDUE BETTY KIRCHNER BARBARA J PURDUE 325 E WASHINGTON ST# 179 711 CUYAMA RD Page 7 f �T SEQUIM, WA 983823488 OJAI, CA 930232415 ------ 902243018 902243024 GLEEFORD KESSLER JR SEA-KOTA INC JANET L KESSLER 2183 CRESCENT BEACH RD 374 STATE ROUTE 20 PORT ANGELES, WA 983638703 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689385 902234014 902231021 ALFRED F LANG TRUSTEE ELLYN SPENCER LANG FAMILY TRUST 67 BRICKETT HILL CIR 970 LORANE HWY HAVERHILL, MA 018301580 EUGENE, OR 974052322 902234003 902231018 L RENEE MARGGRAF STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF 282382 US HIGHWAY 101 REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689396 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA, WA 985011076 902231001 902234002 MJ AJ LLC WILLIAM E SULLIVAN PO BOX 930 391 WASHINGTON HARBOR RD CHIMACUM, WA 983250930 SEQUIM, WA 983828546 902243009 902234013 WALTER MOA THE LOCAL 101 LLC 154 STATE ROUTE 20 PO BOX 1784 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689311 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983680199 902243016 902233012 WALTER A MOA JR DOROTHEA TOOKER GAIL L MOA 1215 JEFFERSON ST 154 STATE ROUTE 20 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983686620 POR T TOWNSEND, WA 983689311 I LOG IT'E b,. # / 902231010 902231022 page '}a4S,' KAREN BLESSING JOHN DICKSON Al t'°% PO BOX 1491 MELANIE DICKSON (� PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983680044 282084 US HIGHWAY 101 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689331 902243048 902231015 CHRISTOPHER CALERO CHARLES J DOYLE SUSAN CALERO PO BOX 141 173 FAIRMOUNT RD CHIMACUM, WA 983250141 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689745 902243039 902234012 JULIE A CAMPBELL THEODORE J EIDSMOE 405 STATE ROUTE 20 84 ASH LOOP PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689384 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689023 964518001 902231009 VLADISLAVA CERVENKA BRIAN R HARDCASTLE 232 PETERSON RD KATHRINE E HARDCASTLE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983688706 6330 SECHELT INLET RD CANADA, 902243040 902231024 GERRY A CONNELLY MICHAEL HUNTER 81 E RIDGEVIEW DR ELLESA HUNTER SHELTON, WA 985849538 9552 4TH AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 981172115 902243021 902231017 JAMES B CROWELL KURT JAFAY LIFE ESTATE PO BOX 1048 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689772 CARLSBORG, WA 983241048 902231011 902243033 ROGER C DECKARD JEFFERSON LAND TRUST AUDREY DECKARD 1033 LAWRENCE ST 282224 US HIGHWAY 101 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983686523 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 983689332 ��¢sON co G JEFFERSON COUNTY ti DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT tow 621 Sheridan Street 1 Port Townsend,WA 983681 Web:www.C.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevebpment 44 N k o Tel:360.379.44501 Fax:360.379.4451 Email:t .ieferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning 1 Watershed Stewardshi center October2..3,, 2013 # e Dear Reviewer, Page --_L -kl s. RE: MLA13-00088 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section consultation reports. This proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 04)902 243 048,964 516 003, 964 516 903, Junction City Blk 160 & 169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section724„ Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. Comments must be received within tkiviy i ('3 0 calendar days or by November 2Z 2013. If no written response has been received within tvurili (30) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, e I i D . Donna Frostholm- LOG i "E! Page_f_o __. cc:RICK MRAZ, * DOE SHORELANDS OFFICE SEPAUNIT @ECY.WA.GOV, *DOE SEPA REVIEW BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON, *WA STATE DNR SEPA CENTER, *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW MARGIE SCHIRATO, *WDFW SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV, WDFW SEPA REVIEW PO BOX 47829, *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT. - MARK TOY 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106, RUSSELL HOLTER 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD., PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE LEANN JENKINS, *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE ALISON O'SULLIVAN, *SUQUAMISH TRIBE KRIS MILLER, *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW RANDY N LUMPER, M.E.S., *SKOKOMISH TRIBE CYNTIA ROSSI, *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL PAT PERRYMAN, *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR ERIC KUZMA, *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS JARED KEEFER, *JEFFERSON COUNTY EH DIRECTOR 1615 W. SIMS WAY, *JEFFERSON TRANSIT SEPA REVIEW, *WSD OF TRANSPORTATION OLYMPIC REG ART SPORSEEN, DR ENGINEER, *WSDOT OLYMPIA REGION HQ ATTN: BILL GRAHAM, *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 2000 OLD GARDINER RD, JCFPD#5 450 FIR STREET, *PORT TOWNSEND SD #50 REGULATORY BRANCH, US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CHARLIE BERMANT, * PENINSULA DAILY NEWS TRISTAN HIEGLER, * PORT TOWNSEND LEADER 2303 HENDRICKS ST., AUMOCK DESIGN WORKS \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 10/18/2013 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA13-00088 LOG APPLICANT: LOG IT ' North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison Street Port Hadlock WA, 98339 Page gR Application Received Date: July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003,964 516 903, Junction City Blk 160 & 169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„ Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend&Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on November 22,2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold(final)determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold(final)SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance(MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final)determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type Ill permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ LOG I ,1: Page� 1___.If +-11'9ON eN. JEFFERSON COUNTY LOG ITEY . DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 A 3601379-4450• 3641379-4451 Fax • Page 9 a Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): aO 2[- Discovery Bay Res-1-rira-tion Proi�.t "� � Tax Parcel Number: �� '��1 l b� 7o223t�n1 Property�: To fa!^-b 4CS (acres/square feet) Stet AdgesspsantorDir is s • . ctocto2 `f3D "`f�'a.2`i3t2b,++ oz2.y3o-¢8 Project si e e- fends along lower DiSCa fiery From ('ar Iner Road ice airmovrrt Ied Property Owner(s)of Record: Prfrnatq: LUashin ivri 11,nnrtthe f` b{.h and ta,f1dfr ,Kyis6ulioS Telephone: 340- 90 -7723 J Fax emaa:902/413o dfithikt4.901 Mailing Address; C,00 f aPifol Way tJ , Olympia.we") iS50l ApplicantfAgent(if different from owner): Norjhnry, epic Snlrnon Cnnli.han,Wektn long Telephone: 3b0-3-7,3-805i Fax 360-3'79 -3 'S8 email:lu- ec�manac5eranasc.or3 Mailing Address: a 05 E3 was# Pcl ti l-tn r{l na< us 'ii 8 3Rei' What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies • ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ DemolIttion Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) O Single Family ❑Garage Attached 1 Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]" C] Manufaduned Home 0 Modular 0 Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial" • 0 Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use .0 Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address. ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat'" ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan" O Propane a Long Plat"" ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments" ❑Allowed"Yes'Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration" ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program ExemptionlPermit Revisions*" O Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)" ,Shoreline Management Substantial Development ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance 0-Wireless Telecommunication" ❑Comprehensive PlanrUDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium 0 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment •May require a Pre--Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request "Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: Akihoowde rkrmii o- NPR, t^SH cot plignce, Sec t n i 06, nge n ,SGPR, Sec-Fiore 40t,CZMANierminfrbon DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate No G� _ i !.o t.! .7 'to act as my agent in matters relating to thi appli on for permiit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: • 30 I By signing this application ,the ownerlagent attests that the Information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the ownerlagent with respect to this application packet . may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costa,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jeff: n County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this pemmiL I further agree to provide access ht f entry t efferson County and Its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required l;lter ins ns Staff and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant info the County in writing at the time of the application t he o wan prior Signature: ,4_1.2 L Date: 3 3'0/I 3 The action or aotions,Appicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species end could lead to a potential take of n endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or'ESA."Jefferson County m no assurances.to the applicant that the actions that wilt be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not viol e E . Any i uai,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in p' with e J County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable r r adh ng to complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaim and ' ns and dates it below. Signature ltti" Date: ��gD GAPermitCentex####FORMS###WRD FORMS\Matron Permit Application 5-29-QB.doc ((((( �,._� h ...,d # _L.. 7 BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ( ) / MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: ' CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS • NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: ' EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: 0 New 0 Wood Existing: /' ❑Sewer 0 Addition 0 Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System 0 Alteration/Remodel 0 Concrete Total: Hei 0 Individual System 0 Repair ❑ Masonry - SEP Permit#_ 0 Demolition 0 Other: Bedrooms: / Water Supply: Existing: //Setback: 0 Private well 0 Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed:Total: Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: 1- Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: ' Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Curre Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is g Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: 1 Underground Tank I Above ground Tank SO of Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove 1 Fireplace Inser I Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured!Mobie Home? Yes / No When applying fora permit to install a propane tank yo must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Foota•e Current Pro•osed t 91j'.4,. a ,',I'". s :'",s,"; . _°.,, ''�•u6f?'•ra ..3 " I.n' . ` �.i; Main Floor Heated EH Bid App Review: IIIM 2 Floor Heated 't ; Consistency Review: Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine ," '�Y Additional Section: CU 2\ S--"g Heated Basement Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement / a"" '' State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated // - :5'' Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport / , 6� SUBTOTAL Decks ' ' , 911/Rd Approach fee: Other ` IAA-'' TOTAL $ �j C� (te /'' : . Receipt Number. � 1M 2_ \ \o r ! -� Cash/Check Number 1 s.--1 ESTIM TED COST(REQUIRED) Date: 0/71)//S .Fair et value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Initials: E}t G:\PetmitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-0&doc Map Output Page 1 of 1 Arc,IMS HTML Viewer Map / 3_._...t._ ..___ i .........4__..,......,:::,,1 1 -„„„,..i.:„.,...,.-„s...„c.... c,_,,.....-h. 4.i :?.,,. ...::,::.„....„:,5,,,:.. .....23":„1..., ,:„...„.,„.,..,,:..,.,,, ,...:,,......„„,. A. ,........,. . ,,, '-"''''''.• ;4°' A:,---,',e or J-4,-i• ,:�,' I .;,;.'.;,?'"3.,''''',S, .::: i I �X 1 '6 + . r # t ` § Legend/�- l Y y Selected Features'r ni h s k c r Lima g �; y !M � M � ,0r.441,e ,N JC_Road s t ✓ 3 c" TewinshiP 3 rrM , �li . p 2 ` �29N2W G T t q i --' ? '' P1 40''L ai � ;. 1. t SR20r _ if' i �.r , _ - f Page '5 .fir - ' �- t tw ' lit,_- r i 4 — �� I — L _ 1` t pima 1 �' Bentley - tliSs t +ded Jdelrsot Camay Cant*Saviors i�5 ('I� Ott�,_� 0 1270 4 I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 18 11:39:58 2013 - . ,,. c-f 6v-ea i S t( SO a+6 tint ( -----7 © [ Dc V v,e v Pay http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/18/2013 AGENCY USE ONLY E-1- Date received: US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE Seattle DseBrs Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: 1,2 Tax Parcel#(s): Application (JARPA) Form USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. :0G g9, Page ) ). of g� Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help] Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project (USACOE Project#'s:NWS-2013-40, NWS-2013-109, NWS-2013-110 Throughout the application these numbers will be used to identify specific project elements as requested by the USACOE. Other permitting agencies, please ignore.) Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Long, Kevin 2b. Organization (If applicable) North Olympic Salmon Coalition 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 205 B W Patison St 2d. City, State, Zip Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail ( 360 ) 379-8051 ( ) ( 360 ) 379-3558 projectmanager @nosc.org Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?Sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage ESA • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits. If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermittinQWa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/jarpa iarpa form/9984/jarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help(a7ora.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 F'age 1 of 21 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [help] 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 3b. Organization (If applicable) 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 3d. City, State,Zip 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail ( ( ) ( ) Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [help] E. Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) x There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. x Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Guzlas,Kyle 4b. Organization (If applicable) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 600 Capitol Way N 4d. City, State, Zip Olympia, WA 98501-1091 4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail 360) 480-7723 ( ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2011 Page 2 of 21 LOG iTt.ft, # a-1 Page L3 of Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] E. There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help) X Private I-1 Federal x Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports,etc.) — Tribal x Department of Natural Resources (DNR) –managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) [help] No street address- see 5p 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Port Townsend, WA 98368 5d. County [help] Jefferson County 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 24 T29N RO2W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [heipi • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long.(Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47°59'41.05N lat./122°53'8.31 W long 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. WDFW Parcels: 902224005, 964516003, 902231004, 964516903, 902243046. Jefferson Land Trust Parcels 902243044, 902243033, 902243020. Calero Parcel 902243048. The waterline and trail portion of the project are located on WSDOT right of way for which there are not assigned parcel numbers. 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel #(if known) THOMAS JOHNSON 325 E WASHINGTON ST# 179 964516004 BETTY KIRCHNER SEQUIM WA 98382-3488 KURT JAFAY PO BOX 1048 902231017 CARLSBORG WA 98324-1048 JENNIFER/JEFF PEDERSEN 2160 QUIMPER PL 964510002 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 21 1 ot it_°) KAREN/SUSAN PEDERSEN PORT TOWNSEND WA983687307 WSDOT, Highway 101 Right of Way Jefferson County Public Works Old Gardiner Road Right of Way 51. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] The project area includes areas of freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands. A wetland delineation report is attached. 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location.[help] Within the project area and behind the railroad berm from southwest to northeast there is are three waterbodies: the cherry pond, the mill pond and lagoon. Discovery Bay is adjacent and to the south. An old railroad grade berm, and dredge spoils will be removed on the banks of Snow and Salmon Creeks(Figure 1, Vicinity Waterbodies) 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] This project is split between habitat restoration of marine nearshore, and the relocation of a waterline (affected by that restoration) to the highway 101 right of way, and location of a regional trail along a portion of the new waterline alignment in the highway right of way. Because these elements are so different restoration and waterline/trail are each separately addressed for this section. Restoration area (USACOE # NWS-2013-40): The restoration site is categorized as a `terrestrial/nearshore marine' type. Upland vegetation in the restoration project areas is generally comprised of invasive weedy species, with some young alder. Below the high tide line areas of the project area contain high salt marsh plant communities. Vegetation in the waterline/trail area (coinciding with WSDOT Right of Way) is grasses, invasive weedy species and occasional young fir or alder trees. Refer to plansets titled "Maynard Shoreline Restoration Project" and "Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project" Waterline project (USACOE # NWS-2013-109) and Trail project (USACOE# NWS-2013-110) Habitat conditions along the waterline/trail alignment are poor. This is a highway right of way and has been maintained as such. It offers little habitat value, with limited potential for an increase in this value. Habitat conditions in the restoration project area are degraded by the presence of an abandoned railroad grade built on tidelands and saltmarsh with significant negative impacts to the hydrology and ecology of the area. Refer to plansets titles "Waterline Replacement Project" The NOAA website identifies Discovery Bay as Essential Fish Habitat and Snow and Salmon Creeks are strongholds for ESA listed (threatened) Hood Canal Summer Chum salmon and the estuary is critical rearing area for juvenile summer chum. The Discovery Bay watershed is also home to ESA listed (threatened) Puget Sound Steelhead. There are major, human created, problems in the project footprint that have led to degraded habitat for salmon, forage fish and shellfish. The restoration project addresses habitat problems stemming from the construction of a railroad berm in 1917 that filled mud flats, beaches and estuarine habitats including: 1) The removal of—2500' lineal feet of Railroad grade to uncover historic marshes and beaches, restore habitat forming processes, and restore historic hydrology and sediment pathways. 2) The removal of 4 creosote railroad trestles that cross area stream and embayments 3) Improved connections of 4 small streams to the nearshore that have had their mouths buried by RR grade fills 4) The removal of large rip rap and concrete rubble armoring from section of the railroad grade being removed or recontoured 5) Removal of nearshore vegetation consisting primarily of invasive weedy species and replacement with marine riparian trees/shrubs or dune grasses on low backshores. At the Northern end of the project the trail and waterline share a position in the DOT right of way on a highway fill slope. Most of the area of impact of the slope is currently covered in grassy vegetation with an occasional fir, JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 21 alder or willow tree. Downslope and waterward of the area of impact there is a conifer ndid° i.•• rerrne riparian corridor established on what appears to be an old road grade. Page i of The waterline alignment continues south from the shared trail/waterline area within DOT right of way."Here llre right of way is a grassy shoulder with patches of invasive weeds. The waterline crosses beneath Salmon and Snow Creek and beneath highway 101 by directional drilling. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. (heipl The restoration property is owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Jefferson Land Trust and currently used as a wildlife area. It was purchased specifically for conservation and nearshore restoration. The beach is used for recreational clamming. The lagoon is the study area for Olympia oyster research by the Jefferson County Marine Resources Committee. The waterline and trail properties are Washington State Department of Transportation Right of Way, or Jefferson County Right of Way. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] northwest of the project. DNR aquatic lands of Discovery Bay are to the to the rY Highway 101 is adjacent p J q State J 9 Y south of the project. Gardiner Road (county road) and residential neighborhoods are to the northeast of the project. Properties adjacent to the central portion of the waterline project are commercial. 50. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. [help] 1. 1800 foot long section of the rail road grade bed with 1250 feet of large rip rap or concrete rubble armoring, 1650 foot long section of railroad grade bed between and around Salmon and Snow Creek 2. Two 110 foot long creosote railroad trestles, one 50 foot long creosote trestle, and one 25 foot long creosote trestle 3. Standpipe and defunct, perched culvert under the railroad grade 4. Defunct tide gate 5. Private waterline transits area buried in the railroad grade, serves -20 residences 6. Fallen over barn and 2 small outbuildings. 7. There is a septic system on the Jefferson Land Trust property adjacent to Snow Creek. 8. There is a well head on the Calero property that will be decommissioned as part of the project. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] Traveling North on Highway 101 the project area begins shortly before the intersection with highway 20. The waterline project begins nearby, extending along Hwy 101 for 7300' feet following it Northbound to just beyond the intersection of Highway 101 and Old Gardiner Road. Restoration elements begin Northward of the Highway 101 and highway 20 in the areas of Salmon and Snow Creeks. Continuing north on Highway 101 more shoreline restoration occurs NE of the Train Cars Restaurants at 282023 Hwy 101. (Figure 2, Snow Salmon Creek Estuary and Nearshore Restoration, Figure 3, Parametrix Siteplan) Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] The Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline. The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill. These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 5 of 21 • processes. The •r.".''' as orr0 f ) Shoreline restoration 2) Replacement of a public waterline disturbed by the restoration s of a shoreline trail Specific elements of the Shoreline Restoration include(USACOE#NWS-2013-40): 1. Remove armor and restoring a more natural beach profile along an abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. 2. Restore tidal circulation to a currently-enclosed freshwater pond and wetland (Cherry Pond) 3. Remove fill from the mouths of 4 small tributary streams that flow into the project area. 4. Remove a creosoted timber railroad bridge (also called trestle). 5. Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate between the lagoon and the mill pond. (1-5 see Maynard Shoreline Restoration, NOSC, 100% Design Set) 6. Removal of 1700 feet of Railroad grade and 3 associated railroad trestle bridges between and around Snow and Salmon Creek 7. Removal of sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek 8. Dispose of spoils onsite at upland location indicated on plansets. (Items 6-8 See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project, NOSC, 100% Design Set) Specific elements of the Waterline Relocation include(USACOE #NWS-2013-109): 9. Relocate a waterline that was located within the railroad grade into the WSDOT right of way. 10. Directionally drill a cased crossing beneath Snow and Salmon Creeks for the waterline. 11. Extend a non-fish bearing, Hwy 101 culvert (Waterline replacement Project, Sheet W1, callout at 445+00) Specific elements of the Shoreline trail include(USACOE#NWS-2013-109): 12. Construct a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the waterline alignment in the restoration project segment. 13. Construct rock walls, reinforced slopes and a soldier pile wall to support the trail prism and minimize ecological impacts of the trail. 14. Bridge two stream mouths with box culverts at downstream mouths of DOT culvert on fish bearing streams (Waterline Replacement project, Sheet W2, noted with callouts) (Items 9-14 see Waterline Replacement Project, 90% Design Set) 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it [help] There are several major, human created, problems in the project footprint that have led to degraded habitat for salmon, forage fish and shellfish. These problems all stem from the construction of a railroad grade in 1917 and the filling of mud flats, beaches and estuarine habitats for the construction and operation of a veneer peeling mill. The six major impacts include: 1. An artificial lagoon and mill pond was formed and is now connected with the Bay under a 110 foot long creosote railroad trestle. Contaminant leaching is directly adjacent to Olympia oyster and productive hardshell clamm beds. 2. A small stream and section of the shoreline were isolated from the Bay by and subsequently this became an isolated fresh water pond (the "Cherry Pond") maintained with a standpipe which drains through a now defunct, perched culvert under the railroad grade into the Bay. 3. Beach conditions in the nearshore are degraded due to the presence of large rip rap armoring the toe of the railroad grade and presence of creosote logs and concrete. The beach is over steepened and the substrate paved with fractured rock rendering it unsuitable for forage fish spawning habitat. 4. There is a defunct tide gate directly adjacent to Olympia oyster beds. 5. Throughout the area there is almost no native marine riparian vegetation, non-native vegetation dominates. 6. Three fresh-water drainages from the adjacent hillside are piped through the railroad berm straight to the Bay. •••• •evision • age o 7. 1700 Feet of railroad grade and three creosote trestles bisect the Salmon and Snow Creek estuaries impeding habitat forming processes and burying critical habitat for ESA listed species. 8. Sidecast dredge spoils and the formation of a delta-cone at the mouth of Snow Creek isolate h uth of Snow Creek from natural connections to the adjacent saltmarsh/estuary. L ..)1—%)lj I E 9. A privately operated waterline is installed in the RR grade and will be moved as part i$f the project to allow construction of restoration elements. Page 11 10. The Olympic Discovery Trail, a regional trail system, had hoped to use the RR grade as a trail bed; however, because this alignment did not allow for robust restoration, a new alignment has been assigned along Highway 11. Due to equal interests in the trail and in restoration, local politics requires the construction of this segment of trail in concert with the restoration. The trail is the only unfunded portion of this project at this time. Depending on trail funding timing, the trail will be constructed at the same time as the waterline, the same time as the restoration project or after the waterline and restoration projects. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] • Commercial ❑ Residential Li Institutional ❑ Transportation x Recreational • Maintenance x Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] C Aquaculture x Culvert ❑ Float X Retaining Wall (upland) ❑ Bank Stabilization CI Dam/Weir ❑ Floating Home x Road (TRAIL) r Boat House [ Dike/ Levee/Jetty I Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific _ Measurement Device Boat Launch ri Ditch (I Land Clearing El Boat Lift CI Dock/ Pier ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Stairs Bridge 1-1 Dredging LI Mining 111 Stormwater facility X Bulkhead LI Fence n Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool X Utility Line E Buoy Ferry T rminal x Piling/Dolphin ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway [ Raft x Other: Nearshore restoration to remove nearshore fill (railroad grade) bulkhead ( shoreline armor), stream culvert, and a failed tide gate. Residential waterline will be relocated as required to maximize restoration benefits. Regional trail section will be built along a section of the new a waterline alignment 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. [help) • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. II JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 21 Waterline: The waterline will be installed in the highway right of way. It will be installed in a ditch dug by excavating equipment. The waterline crossing at Snow Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the south side of the Snow Creek Bridge. The waterline crossing at Salmon Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the north side of the Salmon Creek Bridge. Horizontal directional drilling (HDD)will be used to install a 12-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) casing. The drill entry and exit points for the HDD will be 75 feet upland of ordinary high water at Snow Creek and 100 feet upland from ordinary high water at Salmon Creek. The vertical alignment at both creeks will be at least 10 feet below the stream bed and approximately 200 feet in length. Bentonite drilling fluid will be used during the bore, to maintain the hole size during reaming, and to facilitate the pipe string pull back. Cuttings, tailings, and the bentonite drilling fluid will be disposed of off-site at an approved disposal site. The HDPE pipe will be fused together to form a single,joint-less pipe string using heat fused butt joints. Following installation of the 12-inch HDPE casing, an 8-inch PVC water line will be pulled through the casing.(See Waterline Replacement Prject, 90% Design Set) Trail: The trail will be constructed on the Highway embankment by cut and fill. The fill will be held in place by rock walls, reinforced slopes, and a soldier pile wall. The trail will not be within a 100 year floodplain. It will be located along the marine shoreline above MHHW and at a distance from MHHW averaging 40 feet (See Waterline Replacement Project 90% Design Set) Restoration: Excavation areas are typically adjacent to tide waters of Discovery Bay. Excavation will not occur in water. Where tidal influence is present, excavation work will be completed when site is not inundated by tide waters. Contractor will use caution mobilizing and demobilizing. Shoreline grading, bulkhead removal, and RR grade removal will occur from the RR grade so that machinery will not need to travel below OHW. Silt fences will be installed around all activities that involve dredge, fill, stockpiling or structural removal. All work will conform to local, state and federal agency requirements. The approved window for fisheries will be adhered to as required by the HPA. The contractor will verify that the existing waterline has been decommissioned prior to any grading or clearing. The contractor will verify all clearing limits with the project engineer prior to any vegetation removal. A de-watering system, including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals, and fill removal adjacent to streams. Creosote trestle bridges will be removed following Best Management Practices and Specifications developed by the Washington State DNR on similar creosote removal projects. Much of the shoreline restoration work takes place within a designated 100 year floodplain. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction'? (Month/Year) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: 3/2014 End date: _6/2015 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $3.4 million 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding'? [help] • if yes, list each agency providing funds. x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know LOG IT'LL United States Fish and Wildlife Service NOAH-Fish America Foundation 1 Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation X Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands.` [help] ❑ Not applicable JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 21 This is a restoration project of a highly altered system. Most elements in the project increase wetland areas, sometimes converting them from their current configurations as freshwater wetlands back to their historic condition of being saltwater wetlands. Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) 1) The construction of the railroad berm and associated impoundment of water created the small freshwater wetlands associated with the Cherry Pond. Restoration efforts will return these wetlands to as close as is possible to their historic form and function. At the Cherry Pond the project creates an estuarine wetland with fish access instead of a perched freshwater wetlands disassociated from the nearshore with no fish access. 2) The restoration project area has areas of other freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands associated with freshwater drainages and the marine environment, these are highly altered, partially filled, with little saltmarsh habitat at the freshwater/saltwater interface. This project will enhance these areas by the removal of fill to create space for additional saltmarsh habitat at these small drainages. Where feasible culvert sections will be removed and streams daylighted. 3) The project creates 8.8 acres of wetland that are currently occupied by RR grade fill, sidecast dredge spoils or delta-cone sediments. 4) Lower Disco Bay Shoreline trail (NWS-2013-110): The trail alignment are pinched between the shoreline and highway 101. This is the only feasible alignment for this infrastructure. The areas of the trail and waterline alignment are maintained by the Washington Department of Transportation as Highway Right of Way and are mostly upland in nature. Two culverts mouths emptying from under Hwy 101 will be bridged with 10' box culverts. These impacts are minimal compared to the overall amount of wetland restoration accomplished by the project. Impacts are captured in Table 7h below. 5) Lower Disco Bay Waterline (NWS-2013-109): The waterline alignment is entirely on DOT right of way and located as close to the pavement edge as allowed by DOT to keep the waterline alignment in upland habitats and out of wetlands or their buffers. Where the waterline crosses Snow and Salmon Creek it will be directionally bored beneath the creeks using BMPs and methods described in 6e. For one short section a culvert draining a non-fish bearing stream will need to be extended and the wetland around the culvert filled. 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know --Restoration, impacts are positive, enhancing wetland function 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know --Restoration, impacts are positive, enhancing wetland function 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If Yes,submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. LOG ITE. xYes No # er/ 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washir1p tla!nd'Ra System? [help] T �J.. • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. xYes No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes n No x Not applicable JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 9 of 21 The project will restore freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands to as near to historic nearshore function as is possible given the highly altered nature of the system. The scope and scale of restoration is so great and wetland impacts so minimal that a mitigation plan is unwarranted. 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [help) Not applicable. LOG ,�.. # Page 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood,etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) Restoration(NWS- 2013-40) Excavate:Breach Cherry Pond Freshwater 1 acre Permanent None N/A RR grade which Category II -restoration will Drain Cherry to historic Pond, and function reconnect to saltwater influence (Cherry Pond reverts to saltmarsh) • Excavate: Remove Upland N/A-currently 8.8 Permanent None Snow Creek RR Converted to the area is -restoration grade, dredge Wetland upland in to historic spoils, and delta (historic nature function cone. Will allow, condition) tidal flooding of these areas . Waterline(NWS- 2013-109): Culvert Extension Cherry Pond Freshwater 154 Permanent C Adjacent of nonfish bearing Category II square creation of 8.8 DOT stream feet acres of crossing and Category I wetland fill wetland 11f no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 'Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. "Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R), Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 21 Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: N/A 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, e - ®� yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [help] Waterline Project(NWS-2013-109):Fill material will come from a local pit or potentially from the adjacent restoration area. Soils will be gravelly/sandy pit run. Approximately 100 cubic yards will be placed. The fill prism will be approximately 18' long by 14' wide by 11' tall. It will be retained by rock walls and a trail placed on top of it. Beneath the fill a culvert bearing storm and surface water from the West side of highway 101 will be extended approximately 20' to maintain its connection to the wetland. This stream has been deemed non-fish bearing by WDFW. 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Prior to any excavation silt fencing and other erosion control measures will be installed per plan sets and where required to prevent sediment or sediment laden waters from reaching the waters of the state. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) Cherry Pond: 300 cy of RR grade fills will be removed to reconnect the Cherry Pond with the marine shoreline. The Creek feeding the Cherry pond will be diverted and the pond drained using BMP's prior to the breaching of the RR grade. The RR grade will be removed with excavators, loaded into dump trucks and hauled to a permitted upland disposal site. All work will occur in the dry. Snow Creek RR grade, sidecast spoils, delta-cone removal: 23,000 cy of material will be removed from these areas to restore the marsh to its historic configuration. The material will be removed with excavators, loaded into dumptrucks, and hauled to an adjacent upland site for disposal. All work will occur in the dry. Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] x Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] —1 Not applicable Lower Disco Bay Trail (NWS-2013-110): The trail is located as far from MHHW as is feasible. The design considers existing native marine riparian vegetation and strives to have the minimal impact to this vegetation possible. The trail project will require the construction of rock wall, reinforced slopes and soldier pile wall. These elements are included in the design to minimize impact to adjacent shoreline riparian vegetation by minimizing trail prism width. Two box culverts will bridge the mouths of culvert outfalls on fishbearing streams at the downstream end of 101 culverts. Waters flowing through the existing culverts will be diverted during construction of the box culvert. WDFW has looked at these streams and determined one could hold resident fish and the other anadromous fish if the Hwy 101 culverts were passable (which they are not). Lower Disco Bay Waterline (NWS-2013-109): The waterline will be located as near as possible to the paved highway shoulder, it will not impact waterbodies. Where the waterline crosses Salmon and Snow Creeks it will cross 10' beneath the creek through a directionally drilled and cased shaft. Impacts associated with the creek crossing would be a 10 foot wide construction path used in trenching for waterline hook up to the shaft. No significant streamside vegetation would be impacted by the trenching, mostly grasses and invasive weeds. One culvert extension on a WSDOT culvert will be required for •••• evision • 'age o ITEN Pae , construe on ie trai prism. Waters flowing through this culvert will be diverted during construction of the culvert extension. This stream is considered non-fish bearing by WDFW. The construction path would be seeded, strawed and planted with native shrubs prior to back out. Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40): Prior to restoration actions below MHHW the harvestable shellfish resource in the project footprint will be harvested by the local tribes. These resources will be reseeded post project by WDFW. Olympia oysters in the project footprint will be temporarily relocated during project construction. To date, forage fish spawning surveys at the site during likely spawning windows have not detected surf smelt or sand lance spawn. Access and phasing is key to performing work at appropriate tidal stages. NOSC will require that the contractor submit a detailed project schedule that will require them to think through all of the steps and how they will be executed with consideration given to the tidal cycle. The first phase of construction will be waterline and trail construction. These will be undertaken as soon as permits are in hand. Once the new waterline is in and water rerouted into it, restoration actions can proceed. It is anticipated that fish and weather windows will make summer/fall 2014 the likely timeframe for restoration element construction. There will be two distinct restoration project areas, the Maynard Shoreline Restoration Area and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Area (Figure 2) with individual implementation schedules designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. Maynard Shoreline (Figure 2, and Maynard Shoreline Restoration Design Set) The first phase of work in the Maynard Shoreline is the removal of a110' creosote RR trestle spanning the opening into the Lagoon. DNR BMPs for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the specifications, and the contractor is required to submit a 'bridge removal plan'. A crane can be mobilized to the site, so a barge will not be necessary Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent RR grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Except for the extraction of subtidal pilings on the RR trestle, all work will occur in the dry. The second phase of construction is earthwork to remove/modify the RR grade beginning at the NE end. When excavation and grading is required below MHHW it will occur in the dry and be performed from the RR grade. RR grade removal will take place in sections. In a given section during one low tide cycle the contractor will remove bulkheads, excavate and remove fill, overexcavate unsuitable beach material and backfill with appropriate beach substrate so that by the time the tide returns the beach is in its desired configuration. The sensitive nature of the grading and site in general makes contractor experience critical. NOSC will hire qualified contractors with experience working in tidal areas. There are many aspects of the grading will benefit from field supervision by an individual with the authority to make field adjustments. The NOSC project manager will be onsite to serve this purpose. The project manager will also assure BMP's and permit conditions are being followed. A portion of suitable excess fill will be used on-site. Excess and unsuitable fill will be hauled off site to an appropriately permitted disposal or reuse area provided by the contractor. Proof of a permitted disposal site will be required from contractors in order to submit a bid. The third phase of construction will be the dewatering and breaching of the Cherry Pond and recontouring of the RR grade in this reach (Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plan Sheet C 2.3). The contractor will be required to submit for engineers approval a creek diversion and pond dewatering plan prior to performing work. All excavation will take place in the dry during low tides. The fourth phase of construction(could take place at any point during construction) is the enhancement of salt marsh benches and stream daylighting(culvert removal) at the mouth of two small freshwater drainages at the South end of the project (Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plan Sheet C2.1, C 2.2) All excavation will take place in the dry during low tides. The northern streams culvert will be shortened by 50 feet from its outfall, and replaced with a natural stream channel. The stream will be diverted during this work. Post project, the site will be planted in native species (See Figure 4: Maynard Planting Plan). JARPA Revision 21 . 'age o Snow Creek Estuary Restoration (Figure 2,3 and Engineered Design Set) The first phase of work at the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration is the removal of 3 creosote RR trestles. DNR BMPs for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the specifications, and the contractor is required to submit `bridge removal plans'. A crane can be mobilized to the site, so a barge will not be necessary Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent RR grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Work will occur at low tides. Streamflows will be diverted around work areas to allow piles to be pulled in the dry. The second phase of work will be removal of the RR grade between Salmon and Snow Creek and of the delta- cone and sidecast dredge spoils adjacent to Snow Creek. There will be no in water work associated will fill removal. Fill removal will be timed to occur at tides lower than the excavation work. Excavation in a given area will be completed on a single tidal cycle so that returning tidal waters flow across the final graded surface on their return to the site. Removed fill will be disposed an an upland on-site area, and used to fill in benches in the landscape created during previous site development for homesites. Post project the site will be planted with native species. Estuarine areas will be left unplanted as these areas quickly recruit native saltmarsh vegetation from neighboring stock. The upland fill disposal site will be replanted with native shrubs and trees. ( See Figure 6 Snow Creek Estuary Planting Plan) LOG !TEA!. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help] Page of x Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help] • If Yes,submit the'plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No x Not applicable There are no significant anticipated adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies. The goal of the restoration project is to return nearshore functions to as close to historic nearshore functions as possible and enhance where historic conditions cannot be recreated. 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] Not applicable— nearshore restoration project. 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or ,waterbody removed from directly waterbody affected Restoration (NWS2013-40) RR Grade Discovery __ in Permanent 11,160 removed from 1850 linear feet JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 21 Removal Bay and adjacent to Maynard waterbody Onsite fill No impact, 5,160 adjacent (not 0 disposal, create in) Maynard Adjacent backshore Discovery hill that will Bay be planted with native plants Beach grading Discovery Adjacent No impact 0 0 Bay Culvert removal Discovery Adjacent No impact 0 0 Bay Armor/rubble., Discovery Adjacent Permanent 2500 tons of rock and 1480 lineal feet removal Bay concrete rubble of bulkhead removed removed Trestle Bridge Discovery Permanent 6251 cu ft of creosote 2910 square feet removal Bay debris removed of shading in overwater structure removed Tidegate Discovery Permanent -10 Cy of beach 120 square feet Removal Bay material will be used in to repair the hole in the bed left by removed tidegate RR Grade/ Discovery Permanent 23,000 CY of fill 8.8 acres Dredge Spoils/ Bay material removed restored to Delta Cone Adjacent/In historic state Removal at Snow Creek Estuary Waterline (NWS-2013-110) _ Directional Drill Snow Creek Adjacent- Temporary 0 0 and Salmon may Creek impact vegetation within stream buffer 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [help] LOG ITEM Page cafe. JARPA Revisron 2012.1 1-"age 14 of 21 Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) For the most part this is a fill removal project. Some restoration project elements will require backfilling. 1) When the tidegate is removed the resulting hole in the bed will be filled with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent RR grade. 2) In places where the beach surface has become armored with cobble or concrete spilling from the RR grade, this material will be overexcavated and replaced with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent RR grade LAG # Page Of 63 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) Prior to any excavation silt fencing and other erosion control measures will be installed per plan sets and where required to prevent sediment or sediment laden waters from reaching the waters of the state. Grading (excavation and filling) work will be completed when sites are not inundated by tide waters. Most work will take place by excavator and dump truck. Removed fill will be disposed of mostly onsite with a small amount to be transferred to a permitted offsite location. Most of the material to be removed is sands and gravels mined from a local pit for RR grade construction. Rock and concrete placed for bulkheading will also be removed. Creosote trestle bridges will be removed with cranes and vibratory pullers. DNR BMP's for removal of creosote piling in marine waters will be used. Where freshwater streams cross under trestles, the flows will be diverted from interacting with piles being actively pulled. Piling will be disposed of at a landfill permitted to accept creotsote material. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360 )379-4466 10/30/12 WDFW Margie Schirato (360)427-2179 1/13 USACOE Tina Tong (206) 764-6913 2/13 DNR Bridget Kaminsky- (360)732-0934 9/6/12 Richardson DOE Rick Mraz (360) 407-6221 9/6/12 DOT Jim Narramore (360) 570-6747 2/13 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [help] • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know,use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 15 of 21 http://uvww.ecy.wa.gov/programs/vvo/303d/. n Yes x No 9c. What U.SF''Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfoub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110019 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? hf j • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.gov/services/qis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. WRIA 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? (help] • Go to httpa/www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/swos/criteria.html for the standards. x Yes n No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [help' • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: htto://www.ecv.wa.00v/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. 11 Rural _ Urban x Natural _ Aquatic _ Conservancy x Other Priority Aquatic 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? • Go to http://www.dnr.wa ctov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Panes/fpwatertvpinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. x Shoreline n Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial n Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current storrnwater ' manual?-(help] • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. xYes ❑ No Name of manual: 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [help] • If Yes, please describe below. E. Yes xNo LOG !TL # � Page di of 63 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 16 of 21 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] Railroad grade bed and veneer peeling mill and associated log ponds. Highway right of way. 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package. X Yes ❑ No See attached Technical Memo 1102F-la, May 3, 2011, Cultural Resources Assessment for the Maynard Shoreline Project, Jefferson County, Washington and Technical Memo 112F-1b Cultural Resources Assessment for the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project, Jefferson County, Washington LJG ITE # / Paged of 3 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 17 of 21 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Puget Sound steelhead Puget Sound chinook salmon Hood Canal summer chum salmon 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List,that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Steelhead, Pink Salmon, Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Chum Salmon, Olympia oyster, Western Toad, freshwater wetland habitat, riparian habitat, eelgrass habitat Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help @ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 1 Oa. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) [help] • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. L A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. x A SEPA determination is pending with _Jefferson County_ (lead agency). The expected decision date is July 2013 . ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 1ob.) [help] I I This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? Other: PI SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. LJG '� Pace ...� JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 18 of 21 10b, Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) (help] LOCAL GOVERNMENT rem rrEtv.` Local Government Shoreline permits: # x Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance / Page of �3 Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: I I Floodplain Development Permit x Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: X Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption —Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for $150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑ Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# ) Li My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor, or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: x Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: x Section 401 Water Quality Certification • x CZMA Consistency FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): X Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) [1 Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit I I Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) -evision I . 'age •o Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includtts t4orm, project plans, photos, etc. hel 11a. Applicant Signature (required) h(.elnl Page z)3, I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) // ; — (S ZO Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the'information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). (help] Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Prope v •wner Sig:t Date 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA) at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev, 06-12 JARPA Revision 20 271 page 20 of 20 ','' JG ITE Page X3 - -, (r--1 4t) ,---- AGENCY USE ONLY .. US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE &Eng... Date received: soaft c›,0,.0 Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) [help] Tax Parcel#(s): . Attachment A: For additional property owner(s) LA roll-CcompuiTED BY APPLICANT[,,,'1-1 Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project -------------------------------------- Use this attachment only if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. 1. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) Calero, Christopher and Susan 2. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 7101 3. City, State, Zip 9 c6' Hi 4. Phone(1) ' 5. Phone(2) --6. Fax ----- 7. E-mail _ (360) 518-5455 ( ) ( ) blackwaterdivingtjuno.com Address or tax parcel number of property you own: 173 Fairmount Road, Port Townsend WA, 98368 Parcel# 902243048, Signature of Property Owner 1 I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site I or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. cinf,-. c_c_ve,ro A Printed Name Signature .....____ If you require this document in another format, contact the Governors Office of RegulatoryAisistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043, People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341 ORApublication number: ENV-020-09 rev.06:12 410408? tAV US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE ofEnginenra 0Az r . Joint Aquatic Resources Permit _ �' r ���_°, a Application (JARPA) 'heir)] a,°,.s°n ' ., Attachment A; ri 5rfi R f For additional property owners) [help] 1 O BE COMPLETED LETED 13 Y APl'L[CANT(hglpJ Project Name: Maynard Beach Nearshore. Restoration Project • Use this attachment only if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. L.JG IT V Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on eting rights-of-way or ` easements. ®--�--- Page o . 3 Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white s•aces below. f Sa�i 'OS Y' f3 �M " s ."�4 f he tgSr"i n C '- i R I '!fititt t �+S m'n�': cFf .? W.'h:.,w �� '� '� ., �.. +,.sazt.s416. nais'acas' �'� '� 'z�yu.+.su..ek.3r.Jaa_su.2� Townsend, Peter M. Washington Department of Transportation Olympic Region , 7 te.-a'5.e1 ' 74� �.-.,b , , a 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW, Suite 302 9- �`2" 't „`ar }, -fig x f ,a ±U s ,. 5^� h.i "T'a' c,'' •r q _y��+y� Y�yr'�yy tty� J{'tatE:,�ZI ' �,cc» P. � i' , .,, Tumwater, WiA 98501 "S 5 CA a' N ir 1 3'60) 570-674'3- 70-6743 ( ) r 4,s et i . � }^t;ribrt n trOWI^ +, 3$ :6$ J"F b�'Gk i A Highway 101 Right of Way jgntl e of Prp�tf + re r I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to. inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, p ie1~- n* 'ce to the landowner. Printed Name Sigre If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043, People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-020-09 rev.06-12 Page 1 of 1 JARPA Attachment A Revision 2012.1 LOG ITEM r of Page V, AGENCY USE ONLY •WASHINGTON STATE ; Date received: Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) amid { Tax Parcel#(s): • Attachment A: __ _ __ _______ _ ___ r---------- TO riE C01z1PLETED t3Y APPLICANT l,.l ----' For additional property owner(s) [help] Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project • Use this attachment only if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. 7. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization.(if applicable) • Sarah Spaeth, Jefferson Land Trust 2. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 1033 Lawrence Street 3. City, State, Zip Port Townsend, WA 98368 4. Phone(1) 5. Phone(2) 6. Fax 7. E-mail • (360) 379-9501 ( ) ( ) sspaeth @saveland.org Address or tax parcel number of property you own: 31 Fairmont Dr, Port Townsend WA, 987363. Parcel#s 902243044, 902243033, 902243020. Signature of Property Owner I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical,with prior notice to the landowner. Printed Name �C�+ram c` e'er^ Signature vim -- l If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-020-09 rev, 06-12 JARPA Attachment A Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 1 -AGENCY USE ON!,,Y - US Army Corps OD" LOG IT WASHINGTON STATE of en9heers Date received: seam p::: Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Page Cif Application (JARPA) [help] I I Agency reference#; I 1 Tax Parcel#(s) Attachment C: I Contact information for adjoining - TO BECOMPLETEDBY-APPLICANT [help] property owners. [help] Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Use this attachment only if you have more than four adjoining Location Name(if applicable): property owners. Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. 1. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. h[ e► ] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) GARY KEISTER TRUSTEE 6156 OLD GARDINER RD 964509906 SUSAN M KEISTER TRUSTEE PORT TOWNSEND WA983689779 MILDRED NORTHUP TRUSTE 215 NAVAL AVE 964514806 CHESTER I NORTHUP BREMERTON WA983124051 KAREN BLESSING PO BOX 1491 902231010 PORT TOWNSEND WA983680044 SEA-KOTA INC 2183 CRESCENT BEACH RD 902243024, 902234010, 902243007 PORT ANGELES WA983638703 DOROTHEA TOOKER 1215 JEFFERSON ST 902233012 PORT TOWNSEND WA983686620 CARL SCHMIDT 282624 US HIGHWAY 101 902243014, 902243010, MIYO SCHMIDT 902243013 PORT TOWNSEND WA983689334 JAMES ANDREW 6150 OLD GARDINER RD 902243015 PORT TOWNSEND WA983689779 If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA)at(800)917-0043. JARPA Attachment C Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 1 • , • 'TO OGe gia Maynard Lagoon •'• .6 .6.„ . Mill Pond • = -:, Cherry ReStOration • Pond Discovery Bay a 461. 4pc, ,44,0 "SNIP ..*11 - Snow Creek Estuary Restoration and Railroad-Grade Removal ai 2(1' t.lAg ' 1;,, Jett'"'"t°4411 - • ra Discovery Bay Restoration: PA8-1MENT OF 1". CO. LoGY SnoW'and Salmon Creeks Snow 16,0 7 ,-!ofWash 08,0^ Vicinity Waterbodies Waterline Relocation M Railroad js ) - N 0 230 460 Feet Olympic Discovery Trail III Maynard Netigh. - - • AI I I 4 Discovery Bay Water Bodies Railroad iztage . Figure 1 C/cI G c a 0/- Georgia ��SSirr Put ; Sound. h � Discovery Bay p a yr • f' #f. arc' d I « f t 9 w r,,k7 m "i✓ .:,7 it 114 tf r � Snow/Salmon Creek Estuary and "°°'""A Nearshore Restoration —Snow and Salmon Creeks !Snow Creek to /� 8 Y pi` LCD V B COLOGY s NW�awwct so�eN Waterline Relocation Railroad Grade oval . ,,. N 0 245 490 Feet T�Olympic Discovery Trail Mayna#earshore Restoratwn A I I � WDFW Property Rail 3 Figure 2 d yi,. ) 4,---- itri q s (0 • 3 C Y ¢a `:'xr+, +f,3 . "_ ddb r 150, 5 . +.tc7 11: ..z.i• �t * �.. ': . Q Q as-*E -,. Il i^n W C k��:fir.* x .: ',7E-4 's'p'a.5...r...'' n CC ,y1 r r,,,. ,t O W• "'a,w , • V W '; e iñ F s• 4 y YES: 4' 4 • e• k kit• ,�f � ' .....*:.'.:";° Of) - '.....` ›,:.- -"'"•'''' -'"4`;',-...1-'''..,•''--,-1.-.••',..,7---:- •-,7":,-':.'•:','•--‘.•••••.:.4..,:.'•:."''...:•:,•';',•.:- 4;4' ..', ,:• ,. ;...,..4.* :. ... ..° ? w0 .'. ,. .s: a w d "W A" ,Y i a W O }• .: i W ,..: r z Z � , {! :]! .!"d 1 4 1" r 'Q ,Y4,. n,' ,su• � • .,r- -.. r , rt. ,. 0Ar ,,„ ,.•”W W O To''3.• •• - �. _ YL .- J O t .. ti K • O 0 � t " a w •` O>- t— zQ LL o ' ce Ix l ° o v•, ,1 Q O. . : a'b` fie. a ' �G/�T=�dw}`I •4, co CL's all a3N1Q dJ Ol0 } s--- 9 ` : ` 'Q .. £• fr t i - V% i!`j-' w R to 6 0 Maynard Shoreline,, Flan411 ?(an k DollasFiR s4 , 0 ?ry,Saw/soli S �+h.a need for Salt S(�re,Pine, - `, • Iolerance.Trees will beat 10 sp m ,r+h noo4ka rose planted �aelueertPt�r f .- `•" bb 4acses ootk°` 'tams will likely need +0 be cullere a .. 4. ' OPT -troll Madron€ and invasive°s mare+ained. A few . 10' wid•1n na dtOna al be p(a1iled initially to y t 10,4-k. See The scCees5 ral�.on*1`s ale. _, .A0Gt Ev. L1 C pond age_`? � le eNt e '" d Imo 1 ;r ,ft 11 , .., * , k} ,,t µµ isit . • .-1' . ., , !it oi ) 1 d : / , 9 A ,I,, i 0 { 1 „ C . 4. a ! il • • 9 ` - See. 1 n sc?#- a Fig e 4 11 00 t" it 1 -T-g 1 1 I istr. LOG 'E J tfn ... # A. 3 0 11.1. 1—t Page - 0, 1 s 11 04 r„ 3 ig 4 *-, •se St 31" C3 *cc ,,t9 42,4.0 0, 4 I 4 ii> 0 ri 4- v-...,111 .: c_.„.A......---1 .. ,...........„--, V 4. . .. 4,, tar 4i% ..11. flitrl Ittit.,- s) .,, .., . 9..to il. N N t •S iS N., C' N Figure 5 :r O d oit 0 Pa II d rC Cr, # �e Page of a X W Y 1.?nli. ti a 0 to 0 . a 4 40 4i, 4 a • a 111 r ♦ • • I • • 7 I/ 0 • I . 0 ilfr . ........V .,. . ...... '/'4 • a• O • i! ' ' 0 4... t 1.4 . . ., ,t,, .„, .,.. ,,,,,s, 4 x In 0 1r et el 4 77 \ '7. A , , ,tt , Oo' ,,,,,,' 1 � Al 4 � ..H q ... 44-1/' a o �E CS • p , _ 6-4--.,, c) I .. o St 0 of • . ,To Ls • sa . 40 . . • t . 3 • y ls4 vii 9 ki c � .� a v )G IT # '� . , ;-Dage l oi ____b_ - 1 A ,t � s,. t t tj f ri ! ,/` v2`�,,.,.-.- t" �"5.. `' , ,rw� ,i„ p 3 " - 't ,am % ,,, ".. A a\ ,,.- r ate. ,- / il vv,.- ,t - It tits, ,r { :Ti t ti 4� , ,•w. e C '� ' t� ` N �L... ` , \'''.4'.'"..'-a' .`-'1. 1f.''" Ii)''1- WI' k't i4,,'-',, ';t4,),,,:! 44, .' 4 - -,',7-',_:•14-;,,,:iiffil-el I : , ' -"' - ,-- -- ....:„..- '''''''\I li \,,,,, 1 /., ,,,,, / .,"....:f j„.„.„„t,. ) \4).4.1- ...,:".,I.L.,,.:iiriii,t,••:.,,,...„47:it,;',7...i,i_:,..„2 0*-10._- ' :,,c: k,•-%;-- - - , ''''-' ' ' ' — -----T-'-k-----------r-„,i'--- PA exii Ir. ___i 1... 1 :Iii...., „. ,,,,..: „.,..,.. \\.,,. 1.,. .., ,....„,, .. % . . ,A --0... _ PtY 04. ' O r 1,,,,,P-',,,-.-.A.N.J.y • w u JW ,�a _„...,,,i. F 22 O t4J 0._.r . � Q‘ / �Y;.,' . -"+ W""Y ' r « ° I4 x a+J• , • (, a a e. ♦i t f j " — h� ; _,' —4"'' # „ � r�r' '''.4.' i .4 f }eatr ' �°x to x YVf t•it , *,,t a rp b`s: ti ,, •A. J W UT .0 �a r'�-..�.•� _ikV•ra!�M*eiiF+w*' �+w -�Y4�°.i�.-'^W. *F � b ,+.. "r JG ITE' WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. Page of 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project 2. Name of applicant:North Olympic Salmon Coalition 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison St Port Hadlock WA 98368 (360)379-8051 4. Date checklist prepared:6-15-13 5. Agency requesting checklist:Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule-(including phasing,if applicable): Waterline construction: Spring/Summer 2014 Shoreline Restoration construction Summer/Fall 2014 Olympic Discovery Trail Construction: Pending funding, the trail can be constructed simultaneously with either of the above components or independently after the above components. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Wetland Delineation Habitat Management Plan Section 7 ESA Compliance -- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. JARPA application submitted to DOE,DNR,WDFW,USACOE,Jefferson County Franchise Agreement with WSDOT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. WSDOT-Franchise agreement DOE-CZMA consistency determination,NPDES Construction stormwater permit,401 Water Quality Certification DNR-Aquatic Use Authorization WDFW-Right of entry,HPA USACOE-Nationwide Permit, DAHP-section 106 USFWS-ESA consultation-Section 7 Jefferson County-SEPA determination,critical areas review,utility permit,shoreline substantial development permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline. The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill. These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem processes. Specific elements of the proposed restoration include: 1.Remove armor and restoring a more natural beach profile along an abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. 2. Restore tidal circulation to a currently-enclosed freshwater pond and wetland(Cherry Pond) 3.Remove fill from the mouths of 4 small tributary streams that flow into the project area. 4. Remove a creosoted timber railroad bridge(also called trestle). 5. Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate between the lagoon and the mill pond. (1-5 see Maynard Shoreline Restoration, NOSC, 100%Design Set) 6. Relocate residential waterline that was located within the railroad grade. 7. Construct a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail atop the waterline alignment in the restoration project segment. (6,7 see Waterline Replacement Project, 90%Design Set) 2 8.Removal of 1700 feet of Railroad grade and 3 associated railroad trestle bridges between and around Snow and Salmon Creek JG 9.Removal of sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek (9-, (8,9 See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project,NOSC, 100%Design Set) Page of 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Discovery Bay,Jefferson County Washington.Located near the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 20 on the West Side of the bay.No street address.In the NW quarter of Section 24,T29N,RO2W.The project site is linear in fashion,refer to the attached site plan(Figure 3)to best understand the project extent.Topography is available on the attached plan sets. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 30% 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. At the res, ration sites and at the trail site the soil is fill material that is sandy gravelly in nature. The Highway right of way for much of the length of the waterline is fill which is sandy gravelly borrow. d. Are there surface ii di t' ns or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 1-0(3 ITEM NO Page of e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill material will be used to build a trail prism within the DOT right of way.This would be gravel borrow material from a local pit or the adjacent restoration area with quantities estimated at 5000 CY. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Erosion would be limited to post construction in area where the shoreline has been restored to a more natural state.These sections are designed to"deform"where sediment from one area may transport to another area naturally along the shoreline.There is no infrastructure in these areas of the project and such deformation is a project goal and not detrimental. Erosion is not expected during or post construction on the trail and waterline components of the project.These components have been designed NOT to erode during or after construction as they hold infrastructure intended to be longstanding. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? The Jefferson County Department of Community Development Stormwater Calculation worksheet was used in creating this estimate. Due to the unique nature of this project and project site these calculations are not straightforward, so explanation of methods follows.Site size was determined by adding the size of the parcels on which restoration will take place, and the highway right of ways adjacent to waterline and/or trail developments. Site size is 59.7 acres. Existing impervious surface on the site includes only Highway 101, and is estimated at13.3%.New impervious surface from the project results only from the construction of the trail,and is estimated at.7%. Taken together these result in approximately 14%of the site being covered in impervious surface. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: During construction BMP's will be used to prevent erosion of soils via wind or water. Attached plansets include Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control elements to be installed by the construction contractor. Post project, exposed soil will be seeded 4 and strawed with native grasses. Reinforced slopes will be treated with geotextiles during construction and seeded. Slopes adjacent to trails will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Spoils piles at the Maynard Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project sites will be seeded and strawed and planted with native trees and shrubs. Planting plans are included (Figures 4,5,6). =aJG ITE � l a. Air Page of a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and exhaust associated with heavy equipment moving earth are expected.These quantities are difficult to quantify. We would expect construction to take approximately 3 months total for all aspects of the project.Given that most of the construction site is adjacent to highway 101 there are already significant emissions in the area and the increase caused by the project will therefore be minimal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: If the site appears to be generating dust,water trucks will be used to stop this. • 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY APAJAG J6 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water ff a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including nar-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. a.The restoration sites are bordered by Discovery Bay for their entire length. b.Restoration work will take place at the mouth of Snow Creek,Type"S",Salmon Creek Type"F'. c.The trail will be along the shores of Discovery Bay,it crosses 4 small unnamed tributaries that currently enter the bay from adjacent highway culverts.Two of these tributaries feed into the Cherry Pond and are unmapped,though discussions with WDFW suggest the Southern stream is N and the Northern stream is type F.The two mapped tributaries in this area are also designated at Type F. d.A man made pond"Cherry Pond"is adjacent to the trail alignment and will be reconnected to Discovery Bay to become a saltwater wetland.The wetland delineation included with this application classifies the pond as a Category II wetland.After restoration it is expected to become a Category I wetland. e.A second man made pond near Snow Creek the"Snow Creek Estuary Pond"has also been classified as a Category II wetland. It will be unaltered by the project. f.Trail construction is with-in 40 feet of the shores of Discovery Bay. g. Waterline construction is within shoreline buffers at the Northern end of its extent for approximately 1500 feet. The waterline will be directionally bored and cased beneath Snow and Salmon Creeks. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Letters correspond to waterbodies listed in 1)above: a.Restoration work will be adjacent to Discovery Bay. Some work will occur below MHHW on low tide cycles. The work entails bulkhead removal,fill removal,the removal of a creosote railway trestle all to be accomplished with heavy machinery.Details included in Maynard Shoreline Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plansets. b.RR trestles will be removed from Salmon and Snow Creeks. c.The project will extend a culvert conveying a stream not designated by the Jefferson County Critical Areas maps. Discussions with WDFW inform us that it is nonfish bearing.Extension of the culvert is necessary to convey the waterline(Waterline Replacement Planset,Sheet Wl,callout at 445+00).Another unlisted culvert will be shortened by 50 feet in the Maynard Shoreline Restoration area(Maynard Shoreline Restoration Project Planset Sheet C2.2). Two box culvert sections will be placed over and adjacent to the current outfall of WSDOT Culverts(Waterline Replacement Planset Sheet W2.) d.In the northern restoration area the"Cherry Pond"a manmade Category II wetland will be modified to so that the northern creek feeding it,designated as Type F,will be connected to the shoreline by abandoment of a fish passage barrier culvert and removal of associate fills.This is returns"Cherry Pond"to near historic conditions,and it is expected become a Category I wetland. See Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plans, Sheets C 2.2,C2.3. e.Restoration grading will occur adjacent to the Snow Creek Estuary pond but is not expected to alter the character of the pond.The shores of the pond now covered by invasive species including reed canary grass,Himalayan blackberry,and scotch broom will be cleared,planted and maintained to a establish a native plant buffer. See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plans,Sheets 3, 10.Planting plan Figure 6. 6 f. A section of the Olympic Discovery trail will be constructed approximately 20-80'from the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay.The trail prism will be set on a side slope along the DOT right of way. While much of the prism can be graded to be stable,in places it requires buttressing with a rock walls,reinforced slopes and soldier pile walls.See Waterline and Oly Discovery Trail Plans. g.Waterline construction.Where it follows the trail alignment the waterline causes no impact greater than the trail alone.At Snow and Salmon Creek the waterline will cross beneath the creeks in directionally drilled,cased crossing.Impacts associated with the creek crossing would be a 10 foot wide construction path used in trenching for waterline hook up to the shaft.No significant streamside vegetation would be impacted by the trenching,mostl grasses and invasive weeds.The construction path would be seeded,strawed and planted with native shrub out. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed Page of from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Fill removed from wetlands at Restoration Site:33,827 CY This fill material is RR grade embankments and sidecast spoils deposited on the banks of Snow Creek during past dredging projects. Fill placed in wetland for trail construction: 100 CY(154 Sq ft)This fill would be gravel borrow placed around the culvert extension to allow the trail to fit onto the highway shoulder. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. The tributary feeding the Cherry Pond(Restoration Plan Sheet C2.2,C2.3)will be set into a pipe and diverted from the pond.With the diversion in place the pond will be allowed to drain before the RR grade impounding the pond is removed/modified. The small tributary feeding into the South end of the Cherry Pond will be diverted when its culvert is extended.As this is a seasonal stream it may be dry during construction in which case no diversion will be required. A small tributary will be removed from the confines of a culvert as part of the shoreline restoration.The stream will be diverted during culvert removal and streambed construction. 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. Nearly the entirety of the restoration elements shown in the Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project plan set and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Planset are mapped as 100 year floodplains.No infrastructure that would be affected by flooding is being installed.The project removes bridges and drinking waterlines from the 100 year floodplain. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. NO. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. NONE. 7 _JG !1` ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ®f„ EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. During construction stormwater will be infiltrated on site in much the manner it does now, with additional protections offered by TESC measures installed onsite. Post Construction stormwater will infiltrate over most of the project area in the same manner it currently does. The exception would be stormwater that falls on the trail will drain from the trail onto the adjacent slope for infiltration.The trail is being specifically designed to not direct stormwater into concentrated flow paths due to its proximity to the shoreline.Rather,stormwater will leave the downhill side of the trail evenly along its entire length for infiltration on the slope below. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No.TESC measures during construction will prevent silts from entering surface waters.There are no other waste materials expected. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: TESC measures during construction. Slope stabilization,geotextiles,coir logs,erosion control seed,straw,plantings to restore slopes post construction. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:Reviewer,noted in italics below. deciduous tree: alder, willow, cherry evergreen tree: fir Shrubs:rose,snowberry,Himalayan Blackberry,scotch broom, Grass:pasture grasses in uplands,salt grass on estuary surfaces pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: Lyngby Sedge, Pacific Silverweed, Picklweed,Salt Grass, Bull Rush, water plants: other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project removes 656 2-6"alders, 110 6-10"alders,and 9 12-16"alders that are growing on the dredge spoils along the banks of Snow Creek.These trees will be replaced by naturally recruiting salt marsh community that is natural at the site. Approximately 10 acres of rr grade and associated uplands infested with invasive species will be cleared during the restoration.Where subtidal these areas will recruit native saltmarsh vegetation,where upland the areas will be planted in a native shrub/tree community. The Olympic Discovery Trail is being designed to avoid impacting shoreline trees.A few conifers and up to 10 alders may need to be removed to facilitate trail construction.The trail will also remove 18,360 sq/ft of grass in the highway right of way and areas of Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. The waterline project disturbs grasses,Himalayan blackberry and scotchbroom over 2 acres. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 8 LOG ITT Page' o--f d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: The slope below the trail will be replanted with native grasses and trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Maynard Nearshore Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Subtidal areas where grading takes place will not be replanted as salt marsh species surround the site and will quickly recruit to the new ground. The waterline area of impact will be replanted in grasses and strawed. Planting plans are included in Figures 4,5,6. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, wading birds,waterfowl,sea birds mammals: deer, otter, raccoon, rodents fish: salmon, trout, herring, surfsmelt,surfperch,sturgeon,sculpin,shellfish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Threatened:Hood Canal Summer Chum,Puget Sound Steelhead,Puget Sound Chinook,Marbled Murrelet(Adjacent Waters) Endangered:Southern Resident Killer Whale(adjacent waters designated critical habitat) 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. The project is part of the Pacific Flyway,and important migration route for migratory birds. The site is used by migrating adult and juvenile salmon. d. Proposed measures to preserye,Gelticaffg wildlife,if any: The project is driven by respration,mo t project elements are designed to increase the usefulness of the area to wildlife. Page ofi_3 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. The completed project will have NO energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. Equipment used to construct the project will burn diesel fuel,and will be required to use vegetable oil hydraulic fluid, this creates the possibility of a spill,or the equipment could malfunction and catch fire. A septic drain field will be decommission and removed during the project. 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Contractors will be required to have a spill kit in all active work areas to address the potential for spills. b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Traffic noise from highway 101 is prevalent at the site,especially the trail and waterline construction areas. 10 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise would consist of heavy equipment operation noise during weekday work hours from 8-5. LOG fl nf e � 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Work restricted to week days and hours 8-5. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. Given the proximity of Highway 101 to the project additional heavy machinery noise will be neglible. L C r 02 / Page_,.. of 523., 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Waterline and trail alignments are on a highway Right of Way.Restoration areas are public lands owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.These public lands receive low levels of public visitorship from folks looking to recreate on the property by fishing,hunting,walking,birding or boating. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 4 Creosote railroad trestles are on the project site. 2 Defunct sheds are on the project site 1 buried waterline is on the project site. 1 septic drain field is on the site d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? The 4 creosote RR trestles will be removed The 2 defunct sheds will be removed. The waterline will be abandoned and removed during site excavations. The septic drain field will be abandoned if an alternate system is constructed.If abandoned,it may be abandoned in place or dug out. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural residential 1:5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural residential 1:5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project takes place along shorelines designated"Suburban".The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project is bordered to the North and West by shorelines designated"Natural",to theEast by shorelines designated"Conservancy/Natural",and to the South by shorelines designated"Suburban". 12 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. Much of the project borders wetlands which have been delineated in the attached wetland delineation. It occurs adjacent and along a marine shoreline. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? tJG Zero. ��� Page of 6t3 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY I. Proposed measures to epsuce the propasnl is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if a : N/A ge 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? None proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: NA 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NA c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None 14 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: -')G ITE NA 15 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreation in the area is informal.The area is lightly used for outdoor recreation pursuits including fishing,bird hunting,shell fish harvest,passive recreation and boating. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No.The project increase' ecreational opportunities and access along the shoreline including the development of a section of a regional trail. Page j f c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: NA 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: NA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The site is accessible from the Hwy 101 shoulder.There are no formal access points planned as a part of this project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, .25 mi. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking is provided or eliminated by the project. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No 16 G TEL # 17 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. No. • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. Increase tourism draw at the site may draw 2-3 vehicles per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce occ t Qgapsportation impacts,if any: None needed. 9A i Page 5 of 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. NA 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv- ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. Waterline and septic system currently exist onsite,they are not"available"for any further hook-ups. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project will install a private water utility in the DOT right of way via typical construction methods. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. /Z-6/ ; .. Signature: Date Submitted: _ (S_ r3 18 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction 'T "` with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of age of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. I. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air; pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? The project is not likely to increase these things. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? The proposal is likely to positively affect plants,animals,fish and marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: The project not only protects and conserves these resources by the use of BMPs during construction, its actions restore habitat and ecological processes in the area that are impaired and currently negatively impacting these resources. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? It wouldn't. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NA 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? The proposal to provide positive impacts to these items. The removal of the RR grade may be viewed as some as altering a historic site. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: There are plans to include and interpretive sign about the old RR grade on sections that will not be removed,to tell the history of the area. 19 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The propospl may increase recreational use of the shoreline.It would not encourage incompatible use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal is unlikey to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with these requirements. ITE of 20 # BOG lTE Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Olympic Discovery Trail and Waterline Jefferson County, Washington June 14, 2013 Prepared for Parametrix 4660 Kitsap Way, Suite A Bremerton, Washington 98312 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-0907 Lower Discovery B Restorat roject ay ion Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline P Cherry Pond Delineation Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project G1TE'' _ .w page of November 2012 Prepared for: North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B West Patison Street Port Hadlock, WA 98339 \,, - , �.. _, ,..•.,-, „ _. _ ,, , + ' " 'm- z+w s "'rah ; " ; ,:' zf �`� � 856 50th Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 360 385-6432 dixie @cablespeed.com P age otza Habitat Management Plan Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project June2013 Prepared for Jefferson County Department of Community Development By the North Olympic Salmon Coalition and Olympic Wetland Resources Page i December 20, 2012 # Page ci Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Section 7 Consultation o v n r 1 m . , • ''•WI ›.., .,_,,,,,_1,-, , 3 4-,,,,_,.4 a -)": Mi s r•rt F %jj, _ t , , , 4g:1...k • l 5 t� `` . k- .' d y ? r A+; Tw. CD o '...4.4:'..:::.F . . y... :p -a .Y•, • , d r o ,. • S$9 w rF ;S,x - .i - i Y. '';.a..drr,' • r d.Y' :f%:: .l...6,.n ? ':•1.• 'a },,1y a ':r .,. 4='•-'-' 4 _ syam ' ..n::'.'1s ,'4'.r m ,'. le" gg r `Y ,'.`�,•cb,?-y yl,`i r r tti'3, 1?' 4:.,..,,,,/ /' g YA 5 K Y •�' ao aL . - r..:� 4,4s:' - r!, r d + ., .. s:�.!K:r'Y*��r:Z�'�"�• �},r.= ,,�' ;c 4 n.rat R. 1,4, 3 ;a tl• ,k-..2-7.-4,,.., t,••••,-::a .. #'. 'S� iy�.. a5 r y�,r�,.y:., �-.e. e: r +n s _;, ,-1`. J• vC r♦ .s sa d {�sS F b• I `� rt w•s a:S,,:_:.} ;, .,.,d i•`,;'.4 t..y-,-; a_:�..@: ; , _:..s 51_ N.S's: i; 7': G: t.,: ,d�',,..t`;h..:f,y,,, St 7 i'[ .`;. .3. t, , y FY.' W� �� % 'f".�4 i! f k, 4 'yhs L l r :si S':ri k^ t ` �.+ 'F[- fY j:.r 5 k J a �.•,i - A .`i 4• i 1 f ' 't ei ,,]'k „i,-'4.,-,a vim. •uv' : t i i Y ';; . :...re ..,:;r i',, ,ss”' ..3 ff B f -14,-,=•••• . •,L-50-"; - -?Z >t' rti. #.� 4� >\`. 7i ! c� :dur .,?..a4 'Y "� .rfi � M1, �;, t ) > : [4 .:-‘,.•r A4v..:4Yn ti;: i+`ms�4 3; L ,Ile'rtbl'N :� ♦ l ix:t,Gµ7 pa.rG ;yZ{ ti'l.s; '/v:',4.:: 2 q . ` s%.4 rii,.."A"7 ;*•° {�� `S;: , tf.•: rte.•;•>° ;h.}q:.,: ; w 4 r 'i3.e"•ff r:F.Y jt..5 c s': ' � V i•" 'A .. [• i,:r.r":>Y!Y, .'+F . %FY C ES*L':, K. �i'�.. A•.":4Yfi V.`#" ,J..4E- r' .2:44v[ .'. i,[:.,...V� .. e� n �''r".: �".1; r'}1vY4 'y . . . w::.Y>'..:. fi . -i+ S ',' "!fo'::`,'V ..'C•' _,*�:.•.+F; v . i� :L,;* yj ' " u +: :Ly, °..:4 �"�7 j M1'iyn>` 43rM,v%• i• n Y'z' ♦ ? �.7. y;i"e < � :*."' r k 1= r x. r : N:.,aS ' ; ) �[` �� !n: �t, .. : ; ,��;:Yt';•�.;,;;::.,N.:;.;;_;;::,-. 'YC. r r i; .� �w- � `� gGM�� �: ms: '•'7 a .kw:,�•, �y�`•i.;x. � - •P,4..:4x di .....,F.. tiy°I : .. ,l �:��".-� �r.K,.°��±ry"�.> ,. i... xr.+.. riP �i4: !'.. , Y .y.:sIc t x, :...,.:::r::s 7:• Y „ �.. % ::' �ri;„.:. - Y 'L . r ' }+: 4,i a.. C0 ;t. t."5 rf-; ... j , • Y 1y •. - ,- : 4-i."} , 't ,.stte',s ti v j: J ` ' ! ' ' •'x iAi tee.; F •,'r 4�` � �a � , 1 4,, � Ss, * �. vxm +M -.•A ` ! 3 yi � lf .nc 4,� ., gi57 h-• 'F•�-."i:,. .: w y � a i*$ � ' }t e � ,{ x>ras w 3kh »iT t.,y �; �* ✓' +,7 �i: t� 5�.AXC. k L ti; ".r - .j _ o n 1 i., rAx1 c,i. pry, �">}. �.t T'�}” ' }x (W:q ....;-',...%l- ,s,}, 9 d e :i} - .x 1 t 3 .c t �' � �� i, r �4` !^--�„ 4* r � - r. ii1 t s� � 3 f 4 Z � eh ' �tGrjY '' ,,,� +, * t N " yv 1 , z a- t 7 -•' .a 4.`;'-t 'r � ham• -•wit ,- ;. s ;',C ' 3�V $' .1 r f' ;, -s 11 . iu` t -.a. }', i , z t ,� , r _ .�Y 9 # r*y . ' � 4. c yy� i.. . d i., - Y + '.. .„,,A..,;-, ? ''",,° . e , }fry :d A �,:^ 1, ' s., . =,, r i" y♦1'. '� .t. � 4'�r b+T.°°'! . �� 1:. b A 4' a C ` M -t-:';^ 'S4 �'f,'.p°y. r;;-.t.;.:t»' s r,,: bw:Fa:'.•6'+G."^';t,',4,3,',1"-4-"' 'vq•,; _.1 %,,,,,,, ,r ��r .. � N,� �r •' .� {:t 'k(•: �. �a.". 4r ' i r r""Y Rc R 5]; r 4 ,•,,, I I` .: V!'y 'Ail , y; .:$`: t A-4v fi'y ''y..!1, '.� Y �� '' Y :,Y ¢,! F `- ,l :Y.. " J `•• a �+ d S 1 [ + °s x ` ."� t• ! " i i .F ♦{. ..41 ' a M v • :T x•xJ: f qa i,i' 'r. ' '� 1 ?4t ray q •... 3` �. ")F� 1 X ;'r ly SCI '. i: : '4 W[ L l �Fyn t"-`4"'' '' /• _ t' ; .. ,. ; t f°i° J 1r y.: -.; �„ 3,0''4 £°.�• i V- r p F +r'i 1,,,%.7 4 v .. Y! �y y 1;YSy'A Y 1 {4.--,, 'i _+ -,'..--..-',.'1.),. .. q }.t y *, + •d '. -: �y ': ` _:t• - .-- r' y y S L /�' � il E " ` ' x 'a/£�'Y•!KG~ ; ( n` r• ' N -• Il j #6 F' F t t 0.' O �s �' { Y Y. ..3 Q Q n N [ ` Q F 7 `` § f, c y N } rrt . 'O ',4;41,..!7- r M1• A, ,-„- •-< c ♦G r t r 4� ....y J '9e,', :N Q 0 t. 3 Irro::,,,r-r;1,4 i$. - ty,fir . '� �y.,' t,• :-]t z, 4a • LAYOUT: G01 PATH: U:\Brom\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTreil\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:24:45 PM V 5 W 2 gm m y ti p A x n ^J v zi m C o mp n 0 a iz 5� n > #?II' Z '� m o Q m m $ o m-+ fr o/'gyp z CCIJft/ ..k $ r p g N1�g H ir n m 0 m O Y I if • (01 I m n 0 MIMI 73 2 c�NgWm yz � M m g j 'i9t , = Z 7.11 1 p I n m N - 0 f0 CO V 03 U1 . W N 0 rD 00 V 0) U A W N O X ii D 0 p p O W 0) U, A W N (P W N - N Z O U1 .4. W N -3 O O (1) z rw ca `L * ` f f S $ * * * * F ` g g f N =w i = (=1 n r 8 S D D D A D D D D D D D D m m m -t r01 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A -A -A 'O A a -r 1--- r r r r r r r r r- r , . coin m -1‹ e'�T$ m m n D m m in Z Z m m m m rrn m Z D mrnmm 1;2 = D ➢ D > m ifi ° < 7:1 o _ z z z z z z z z z z o 0 0 0 y • O D D N U) 0 0 r/) C) C) C) N C) z Z z z -D-I tN y z z z n n 0 0 n n n n n n fA R° R° O O O o o S S S x x x x x x x 2z C0 0 0 m m m v 27 R m m O v 7 Crm m n m D rC C C C C C C C C N N D rr i Z A A C n z O rl 9 8.< ...tj m m O 0 O CO CO D D D O Z 0 V) 01 N D N �n CN Z_ x =m m o o 0 0:i rill W * m r) 2,) _ rn 5 51 O n N A ` O _N O op% > usi/ N 0 O Z v �} 0 CN> C7 x n N p (n rn n W W W j 0 N N N N N N N a �� 0 S ? W N 0 SC) CO V O (r ? W Z x m oliboo,... nal 1"." I� m m O @ O W m o z Y$m x -� -I 0 -I -i o -1 -4 -) 0 0 -i z �r/ ayAy n n j n n n n n n n n n Z 1$2 v N O co CO V W U1 .A W N -. O 3�';, i 11MM. M ° s E i -1 -1 -I -i -I -I -I --I --I -1 -1 -1 tn $gg '1 rn 'TI ! WWU Z Z vjvIi n n 0 o m z z m-t -I -.�A A A O O O r r r r r r r ! 1 ! : imml Milaill ri XI CI 0 m r r m m m rn m m m m m m m 1 Q m 3 o C7 0 W co co > > > > D < 2� -c * v� i 71111 >11111' mZ z> A . ....,.. „..„.:.":1'.44,.4-'..:44. .i4 42,-..,(irt.,,,,t,=-.,,..1%,,,:kfii,','Alktv..t,i,P,Z„'...,*.,4:4-1,..r;.k".)..*-...;;;"7_/41,""'%: MINN 0 rim 0„• .0 ----1-----kr---';0-r.,-.T---,,,,,,,,,,,,-....„.„.„.„,,,„,„...:.„...,.. s J' 1, xN Yt n ';, r C #„ „ t I rmil 0 1"-*". p ¢ ,. y 1. c' .v�,„,r '''' y rlI.I - 'Art, a n 4. .� �,t ce 'ka°4 °1 € ' 4 • * • 111.1.1.11 Z r `' T x 0 r z Y_ 4., +,a. a . t +O 1 2�a i 6 met "-Q n ,q--A. �'6 :, m z n o M ? m xx �@ 7p1 m '�+ t A R1_ - .� R1 r p �.'-j k-.. Cl) z `r' y,� 4 -3 ,[ r °`AI.: `6":;-::',.,,,:x ','''urn TF ' PX o m {' "rte A 4 ♦V 6_ 4 4 P'' N j' g■-:' . ': 0 co e .;. `vS' c a � � cca C ,1,"dA t 3 C) `� >Z 0 ~•s .a 8 O ■ toil W Ni J 03 I = p Z < Gam) v ° ril $ X *A , 2"N Zn m CO S>S Z = O X m ° A A D m rn Z? Dr � Y D X A = O Z (n Cn Z Z V D O A ��� O �# 1� O z v� ��7 0 Z m A O O '� T E OPP 33 33 8 4 CA m m ; tI lir." n o 0 p.jiri y m A w °zcmi AO * m° r o a z, z = _C < - co v v U g O Z cn C m m -1 ° W N v z 9 8 W !n as A z° wcn 3 0 ...I in to ° D Z Z O m D ›i'' ° a O O z 0 m ° z n _ _ z -zi 5 -1 -1 w r`) n• .Z Cot ° Z O 2 -ai .7_<] Z a Cmr)- Z N 5 0 � rn � z ° O � kr ar * U�ti y F< - M l'"'" 0 it+ w � ,t 1 r1d :�, € '•... .:..,t„.„.. ....i.o .... 'r. . ...''r''''''''''.'''''''.1.'';': ''''' :4.7'uu . C, rri,, > , ,, , � y z S i O e ,., , . 4 .., I fD [D VJ N , ,.. r N c + $ ''', 41) . _... ..„., w N O s r*a� i� wu.� } D g o=m o Zo o � ,Ft� .� � r�F � c� , Plij { nippy- tiffs D I A Z 1:3 I0TI C C V1 a -,� ,w. 'tt . >j., ; 'l»w :rtx. Jf� �I r \` A 1 A m�GO WN (� rr i elf r y r „ oo�r� zz NzA i O m a O Z �95k .3'yr ;. t tc Z .‘f.--::.:-)=.,:::=,::;7:":',,,. ..,..� 1Li z gym" •' .w .* r� -- , O ' � ','47'. .qo �y - (m) 0 r 'swia `➢ vy.. -` +� `r .. 418'a ..�s . n-a :, t w ,0 �` ; n. ';',1. di c jt w .,c , y x■ ■ I I �/ ` x y (2) C:11) l � F A s«,. � .. ° x° m m 0 x X mm cc-2 1 . x : : 42 c-)T A Z Z °Z n Z c ca c z c.) -+ o b N N Z c m N m° o N N N 4 O 7 X m n n W W N N O W N ? W ao W N + -a -., m m m A xZz O o d 1 � w m m W OZ >m p m r --1 O C C r ry n r 2 S D 0 q 0 O : D TI m n n S r1�' A I I 0 5 , A R. TI m x N N n./ ' _ a o N �5. PCi CI:0) 1.17:, A ' 0 02 > co O A -i z ZZ .Cl ° <m: A Cl O zO r c 5-1' m`, m N zi Z.. _ 7 Z Z A vi z Z z z°W N 7 Z Z O m a r-< En vi Z o D ` g Z Z T v Z°m ui z m Q i_+ W 0 m x z o 'z m z � _ X *m = �I i i* � - I G _ — eiamill cn till xi (11.111) o .....i .0 _ � x m o t r.m y m Q °z OOq 1 a rn _z ° 2_ Z ra A C Z j rn • a [7, co ®% xi -< m 1 ' m z m C y m a "O m N o D c) 0 v A p 0 x N 411111111 DV, '111L-4 t--I 1111144111 :4 0 n m ,.. 1 ri pi I ri II I 111 1 II I I I (1)94 H CI) z 0-1 0 Z Z 0 C) --I PIIIIIM 0 Z (1.4) 73 MI rn rrul ---qapir.RD-- (iin 0 '.. 1. 01.0 tt 0 1,4 c.,<c,t, 0 R > z Z nX X n 8/VOliecli I r-- -1 0_4 4111114//i. .111W1 11111:41 "11 m0 o m 13 < 1""d Z xi m (i) 0 n m 2 31 X M -‹ CO --I > ? Mimi XI H ■:_13 M > 0 IC 0 Z 7.63 o " — H ' 0 cn CD cy, 4, (.4 1.,) _, c, to co -NI 0) to 4 (.) Is.) --, Z Z 3 ED, 13.., ,....., m 0 " M -1 m 'll Cn = a) (D mM cn . co ,,, -n-I ..„m G) -,--, , 1..... w . x , z E z -21. 0rn :-1 ..0 ,... ,0 , Cl) :4-x-3 rri '. -1 z a m cn m r- -0 -0 `e--i (r) "id .-+ C. > T -11. -1 (n > -1 5 7•> — Z `S- ---1 C..... ,-__,,,, rn cc. ot. o > 03 7:1 N -ro• cn cn m z 0 C cl) -I K m > z -I --1 0 -I m c M 01 M W X 0 2 c 51> p" a 11 52 Z z , - , .., .... ---- , C) --i -.A.., H . -, m z cn 1 ).‹) \Y) r, ,Mv`, X -' $ A') 1 i9 TITLE ,--fp:,, ,,,,,: --,.., , Cares-so rf, 6 E g g l'... 11'It CI SEATTLE- ENTRIX SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT — , 4,: r -- p 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 SEATTLE,WA 98119 i 'AA*,M ON fi . . .4? TEL(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 a JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON - .-e- www cerrinoentnx coal i \... SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV KEVIN LONG 600 CAPITOL WAY N 205 B W PATISON ST OLYMPIA,WA 98501-1076 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *DOE SHORELANDS OFFICE *DOE SEPA REVIEW RICK MRAZ SEPAUNIT @ECY.WA.GOV PO BOX 47775 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7703 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WA STATE DNR *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON SEPA CENTER 5310 EAGLEMOUNT RD PO BOX 47015 CHIMACUM,WA 98325 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7015 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WDFW WDFW SEPA REVIEW MARGIE SCHIRATO SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV 414 BUSINESS PARK ROAD 1111 WASHINGTON ST.SE. SHELTON,WA 98584 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-3135 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY RUSSELL HOLTER PO BOX 47829 1063 S.CAPITOL WAY,SUITE 106 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7284 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD. LEANN JENKINS KINGSTON,WA 98346 LJENKINS @JAMESTOWNTRIBE.ORG SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *SUQUAMISH TRIBE *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW ALISON O'SULLIVAN KRIS MILLER PO BOX 498 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD SUQUAMISH,WA 98392 SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *SKOKOMISH TRIBE *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL RANDY N LUMPER, M.E.S. CYNTIA ROSSI , � I"TC �> 541 NORTH TRIBAL CENTER ROAD 7999 NE SALISH LANE G SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 KINGSTON,WA 98346 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 ge ofa3 *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS PAT PERRYMAN ERIC KUZMA SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *JEFFERSON COUNTY EH DIRECTOR *JEFFERSON TRANSIT JARED KEEFER 1615 W.SIMS WAY PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *WSD OF TRANSPORTATION OLYMPIC REG *WSDOT OLYMPIA REGION HQ SEPA REVIEW ART SPORSEEN, DR ENGINEER PO BOX 47440 5720 CAPITOL BLVD SE OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7440 OLYMPIA,WA 98570-6703 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 JCFPD#5 ATTN: BILL GRAHAM 2000 OLD GARDINER RD PO BOX 929 SEQUIM,WA 98382 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *PORT TOWNSEND SD#50 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 450 FIR STREET REGULATORY BRANCH PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PO BOX 3755 SEATTLE,WA 98134 SDP13-00033 SDP13-00033 *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS *PORT TOWNSEND LEADER CHARLIE BERMANT TRISTAN HIEGLER 1939 E SIMS WAY PO BOX 552 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP13-00033 AUMOCK DESIGN WORKS 2303 HENDRICKS ST. PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 Page -7) of f5.`') Donna Frostholm From: postmaster @co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:23 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT45559.txt; sepa notice nosc mla13-00088 jefferson county EMAIL 1 of 2 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepacenterOdnr.wa.gov ITE . Page Of_ Donna Frostholm From: postmaster@co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:23 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT45542.txt; sepa notice nosc mla13-00088 jefferson county EMAIL 1 of 2 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepaunitOecy.wa.gov lOGATE Donna Frostholm From: postmaster@co.jefferson.wa.us Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:23 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Relay) Attachments: ATT45582.txt; sepa notice nosc mla13-00088 jefferson county EMAIL 1 of 2 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov --kiG ITE _ w 1 LOG IT L, . POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the propose development by October 23, 2013. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not about a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA13-00088 APPLICANT: LOG North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison Street Port Hadlock WA, 98339 r age Of Application Received Date: July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date: August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003, 964 516 903, Junction City Blk 160 & 169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„ Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend & Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on November 22, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 )G rfEr _ "")G ' TEYC'. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE Page----XOf JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I, , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1)public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects, waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of , 2013. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2013. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in ,Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA13-00088 Proponent(s): STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT NtcApp3O_APO_U.rpt 10/18/2013 Donna Frostholm From: Kaycee Hathaway Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 9:36 AM L.OG To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: Publish Legal Notice-MLA13-00088publish final.docx P9e-4 ®f From: Legals Email [mailto:legals @ptleader.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 9:22 AM To: Kaycee Hathaway Subject: Re: Publish Legal Notice- MLA13-00088publish final.docx Kaycee, Your legal ad request has been received and your ad(s) will publish on the date(s) stated in your email. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the ad is actually published and measured. Our estimates will give you a figure close to the actual cost. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the ad is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of your legal ad. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Thank you and have a great day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 on 10/21/13 8:24 AM, Kaycee Hathaway at KHathaway©co.jefferson.wa.us wrote: Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: October 23, 2013 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account Number: 15833 Hello, Please publish the attached file, MLA13-00088publish final.docx, one time in the Wednesday, October 23, 2013 edition of The Leader. 1 Please respond to this email to confirm that you have received and will publish the notice. Thank you! Sincerely, �OG tTYy Kaycee K Hathaway " �) Planning Clerk, Depeartment of Community Development _Of 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 Ph: 360-379-4483 e-mail: khathaway©co.jefferson.wa.us 2 Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE:October 23,2013 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 a 1G ITEy %' Account Number:15833 V JEFFERSON COUNTY drf' PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION Page of MLA13 00088 APPLICANT: North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison Street Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Application Received Date:July 1,2013 Application Complete Date:August 28,2013 Application Notice Date:October 23,2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION:282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers;902 231 004,902 242 005,902243 046,902 243 044,902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003,964 516 903,7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24,Township 29,Range 2W,Highway 101,SR 20,Fairmount Road,Old Gardiner Road,Cemetery Road,Port Townsend&Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project,and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report,wetland delineation report,habitat management plan,and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application;(b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development,Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368,(360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m.on November 22,2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday,then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved,policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner:Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information,please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelooment/ JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA13-00088 APPLICANT: North Olympic Salmon Coalition B W Patison Street Port Hadlock WA, 98339 Application Received Date: July 1, 2013 Application Complete Date:August 28, 2013 Application Notice Date: October 23, 2013 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 282023 HWY 101 Parcel numbers; 902 231 004,902 242 005, 902243 046,902 243 044, 902 243 020,902 243 048,964 516 003, 964 516 903,Junction City BIk 160& 169, 7,11 portion of 12, Section 23,24„Township 29, Range 2W, Highway 101, SR 20, Fairmount Road, Old Gardiner Road, Cemetery Road, Port Townsend &Sequim. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development and flood development permits for Discovery Bay and Snow Creek restoration projects,waterline replacement project, and Olympic Discovery Trail project. Proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay and is subject to review under SEPA. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, wetland delineation report, habitat management plan, and Section 7 consultation reports. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on November 22,2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final)determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final)SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance(MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final)determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type Ill permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type Ill permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ I Page of d® Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902243048 Geo Cd 290224305150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TAX 82 Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd CALE 4900 CALERO, CHRISTOPHER T/P Chg Dt 1 /18/2006 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr JODI Tax Code 0151 Status TX TAXABLE Land Use 1100 RES-SINGLE Affidavit 93410 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer CALE4900 CHRISTOPHER CALERO SUSAN CALERO 173 FAIRMOUNT RD PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-9745 Search Ke CMD 6: End Window CMD 7: End of Job LOG ITE ; Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902242005 Geo Cd 290224205150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TL TAX V(LS SR 101 R/W & TL V- 1 ) Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd STAT 4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF T/P Chg Dt 4/28/2004 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr SS Tax Code 0151 Status ST STATE Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 99250 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer STAT4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501 - 1076 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7 : End of Job LOG ITE : Pageof Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000964516003 Geo Cd 290224205151 JUNCTION CITY Nbhd Cd 5430 BLK 160 LOT 7 Loo ID * Taxpayer Cd STAT 4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF T/P Chg Dt 4/28/2004 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr SS Tax Code 0151 Status ST STATE Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 99250 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer STAT4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501 - 1076 ail Search Ke CMD 6: End Window CMD 7 : End of Job II III LOG ITF!:' # do _ Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode: INQUIRY Auto Roll: OFF Parcel # 000902231004 Geo Cd 290223105150 S23 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5450 GOV LOTS 1 & 2(E OF SR 101 ) LESS TAX 4 & 26 LS PTN GOV LOT 1 BTWN SR 101 & RR R/W(RR R/W INCL) Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd STAT 4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF T/P Chg Dt 4/28/2004 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr SS Tax Code 0151 Status ST STATE Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 99250 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer STAT4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501 - 1076 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7: End of Job pageLOG IToEfAs Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000964516903 Geo Cd 290224205151 JUNCTION CITY Nbhd Cd 5430 BLK 169 LOTS 11 & 12(S OF R/W) , BLK 170 LOTS 1 THRU 10 BLK 179 LOT 12 Loo ID * Taxpayer Cd STAT 4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF T/P Chg Dt 4/28/2004 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr SS Tax Code 0151 Status ST STATE Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 99250 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer STAT4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501 - 1076 Search Ke CMD 6: End Window CMD 7 : End of Job G JTE,F` Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902243046 Geo Cd 290224305150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TAX 83 Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd STAT 4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF T/P Chg Dt 4/28/2004 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr SS Tax Code 0151 Status ST STATE Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 99250 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer STAT4560 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501 - 1076 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7: End of Job Page ofd Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902243044 Geo Cd 290224305150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TAX 68(ENLG BY TX 76) SUBJ TO EASE SUBJ TO REST GOVT #521386 Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd JEFF 4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST T/P Chg Dt 2/03/2011 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr JA Tax Code 0151 Status SE STATE EXEM Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 115487 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer JEFF4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST 1033 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-6523 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7: End of Job Page of ge _ i Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902243033 Geo Cd 290224305150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TAX 64 SUBJ/REST GOVT #521386 Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd JEFF 4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST T/P Chg Dt 2/03/2011 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr JA Tax Code 0151 Status SE STATE EXEM Land Use 1101 MANU HM W/LN Affidavit 115487 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer JEFF4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST 1033 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-6523 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7: End of Job .- )G ITE -r Page of Screen : 01 REAL PROPERTY MASTER Mode : INQUIRY Auto Roll : OFF Parcel # 000902243020 Geo Cd 290224305150 S24 T29 R2W Nbhd Cd 5460 TAX 52 SUBJ/REST COVT #521386 Loc ID * Taxpayer Cd JEFF 4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST T/P Chg Dt 2/03/2011 * Title Owner T/P Chg Usr JA Tax Code 0151 Status SE STATE EXEM Land Use 9100 VACANT LAND Affidavit 115487 Vol/Page / C/U Code COMPLETE ADDRESS WINDOW Taxpayer JEFF4000 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST 1033 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-6523 Search Ke CMD 6 : End Window CMD 7: End of Job _ GJTE °, c-falge_ of Donna Frostholm ��1 From: Donna Frostholm LOG ITEM Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:33 PM # T /17 fvf o: 'Kevin Long' F Subject: RE: Notice Shoreline Application MLA13-00088 I will have a better idea of timeline after the notice period is up. At this point, it seems reasonable that the permit could be issued by March. From: Kevin Long [mailto:Drojectmanager@lnosc.orq] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:22 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Notice Shoreline Application MLA13-00088 Yes. I can do that myself. Let me know when the signs are ready. Can you give me an update on timeline?We would like to go to construction on the waterline in March.Are we going to be permitted by then?? Thanks, Kevin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:21 PM To: Kevin Long Subject: Notice Shoreline Application MLA13-00088 Kevin: I would like to notice your application next week. Would you (or someone else from NOSC) be available to pick up a noticing packet and notice boards on Tuesday,October 22 from the DCD office and ensure that the notices are posted in the project area by Wednesday, October 23? Donvia.Frosth.oLvw Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialisst Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrostham@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Donna Frostholm From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:22 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Eric Kuzma Subject: RE: Discovery Bay application _ G IT E._. Hi Donna, There is no septic work taking place as part of the Discovery Bay application before you. @ l of 4_,._._ Thanks, Kevin From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholmCaco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:28 PM To: Kevin Long Cc: Eric Kuzma Subject: Discovery Bay application Hi Kevin: I met with Eric Kuzma yesterday to discuss trail revisions. He will be getting me a revised drawing showing the maximum extent of trail to permit and an index map for the trail segments. I want to check with you to see if any portion of the project includes septic work. I know you were talking to Linda awhile back. Let me know if septic revisions are in or out for this application. Once I have the maps from Eric and you have confirmed that the three sets of drawings (that you dropped off) show the complete project, I will get in touch with you about scheduling the notice of application. Regards, Donna/Fro Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port?bwnsenciy Washington 98368 dfrosth.orm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 F , , , I y n y ,p rt.D , w ,,„ ,, , A m m Ijt ,® O !;. °` OLD GARDINER RD ° oS ., ft .1 to 434 ®® (1p1) ' a . , t6 0 0 0° Z D .� 73 r 1- r 93 > ® = Z ai C5 � •DE. oCh Z + _ CA v O v 4$9,x,®0 , .® Z X m I'1'1 m E Z —< Z cn —4i 0 Z m � N O o 0 a III v I Vl Q ..a CO O O 0 0 0 _� j N � o cD � (o O cl O 2 �.i co 0 —. o- n o cu Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:28 PM To: KevinL LOG ITEM Cc: Eric Kuzma 1 �VI ,+<d Subject: Discovery Bay application _ I Hi Kevin: I met with Eric Kuzma yesterday to discuss trail revisions. He will be getting me a revised drawing showing the maximum extent of trail to permit and an index map for the trail segments. I want to check with you to see if any portion of the project includes septic work. I know you were talking to Linda awhile back. Let me know if septic revisions are in or out for this application. Once I have the maps from Eric and you have confirmed that the three sets of drawings (that you dropped off) show the complete project, I will get in touch with you about scheduling the notice of application. Regards, Doves'Frosthal/vw .associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Tort Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 7-- 0/D PARA- tftti/ itt■te, 19 -1 -( 5OP -/IAL/-? &t Af2.,,,d(17 3 c_e-yyLe AA,L r, pi-n , LOGE. Page ( oft_ Ajd 5 C P A AaLl 711/(_. 14*graia. 6AM_F-(5),LuA3 V37W1LEU c1 _ I II f.) ITE:. .-OG n-1 74-p • ,, • ■ LAYOUT: GO1 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954—NOSC\238-6954-001 WtrlineOlytiscovTrol\995ves\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED By rosmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:24:45 PM 0 I A S o E m 1 m0 A W NN y m 0 XI r n m z¢ O là S jl 7. m m y~ If o 4 . �\ A •���Vppp $ R, m 111 r�O A "'A--.0-ii \ D ir O Q Z 41 Alit • 11.11.11111 1....17:7 By 6 21 i 1 41616 1"116.1r42 z III X I v r f m Z i m=Z J v t0 OV O U 4' W N Z 7 O A4p O co V rn T . W N -+ p O g ,iv.,' iv O r•- rp(c I; f f n? n W N n N S' O0 f f f f f J ? W N Z m f f f *N + O D f g f N =1 n o =y 0 1 O N,m n m N -o. W O f f f f f f D F D f D D m > 3. N .D D D D m m m m m m r r r r r A Vol m m m m m m r r r- C z z m a r r v r m z m m m m m m z z - - m m m 3.Rts D z z o 0 0 0 1,„ X M r' 8414sil's � z z z zA z z z V) N v N x r R> 2 4 o O o _ D N v) tN� cv.> ° x' z x x m N -' mi N N 0 z z n x x = x o S O O O N N /y O 0 N— "l< -0 n r, z v O D x v O O C C m C r C C t- n n 7 v v r C r C r m m r r r rn m am v 5 z O l ' m m m ca Z Z Z n n n w m m N (n V) N > > ti/ r-m . .z m N x�) S x y CCz p z C O 7 u z m m m r R. n A W D m X r- • r� N n z C)N S S v 5 Z y N N N N Z W W O tN N N V (n (Jr O *114. rn 3 A N W 1+ W N CD o N1n A x0 f _. (07-10 r m p w rn n cn p Z W w n p rn tn 1 rn Cn 11 O a N O _, - _.y - i - N -4 m k8z9 - - - - C) m -•, C) rn 11 Z C) -41 "1 n n A A A 311= 0007 C) n CC) 00 0 m f 0 C O z z O z 4 0 z z z 0 A O A O E _, _, -. A 7)) A O 0 O O r- r O O O r r O r O O r r N N r N r N r r (! N A A A A A O N N n N A n 0 2 S x x n n 2 x x0 0 0 0 x x S 0 O 0 C C m 0 O O C C C 0 C C C mm C C C r r m r m m m > 0 z r r m m r m m w DD > > > >a c) c c) DD v S=�0 1 CI 73 > m ,p- C m mo Ipz LIIII 1.11111111 1 5 . ,,k� 4 a �, t'ts R�, r M MN= # y L' �. 31 . "R{ T i { Fes' R' CO 'tx7."2 n o .y �4 MMiK wY 1)'-) G) r,ell 1 sib "'T� ., '.�s .2, ...p. s 1�!,.., -r. ,, \.. 14*.iff.v,:.-_ Z ♦I ^y�� "�. zt i,5 3 ., --„, .7 a �1 z z a r o 6 ?4' -:.{' , iff,..,t ', ' : ' '- ''' Fill ' N, ,... m-1 1• 1.= f r7 73 0 G) oa � ' 41 0 r1 `( U 4, )(vc. r`l BEM / 3 l �of LAYOUT: G02 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSG\238-8954-001 WtAine01y0iecovTrail\99Svca\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY roamuate DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:25:55 PM V ; acC g , ® o ® �: 7 z ® ° ° c z ® 0 © b ® + cP ® > 0 0 loz ) O ) • v a b 1 V I=10 Z ■ O v 0 < $ N -1 -4 -< ° C < -t A -4 A C) -I CO CO A C) �1 $ * ¢ -I v) (C) DD $ (y) A 2 A A m 0 F xs m m I. r > r `� 0 > r z Z o (0 m -DI --4 -Di I Z z Z 0 C Z CO C ° mm 0 Z D O m 0 A Or G') 0 A - 'A m 2 ° r0*I z .Tm1 .Tm) .lm) 2 A 2 2 m n D * v .ZD) 0 )� m _Z i o _( z a 0 `0 Z > ° $ a Z Z m a m \ Z -I r A m C O Z A m Z < Z m N $ C) C) r C T+T m m < -rl Z .n_I N A m m O $ \ Z Z A 'DO m C 0 C m Z r 0 z m Z .Zm1 G A N 4 x m A f Z C) DD Or CA m -. 0 0 m x z < r v z x m m 2 t g 9 m Z D C A 1 E m X z 1 1 i z II r z m a g=m P�;�1 m . I m ao� 4 m w a re i O I i I . O 1 DT 8 8 if I $ 1 1 I 0O A r D I i I ` m oy I 8 i i • <m I I 1 I I m C) V *t 00 2_1 C) N A 0 _ 0 D -13 -I C r -1 O r- Z 0 Z A D 0 -0 O Z Z A r r $ r A 2 C W m A m Z z z� $ $ ° 0 0 - r q .y O m 0 0 z 0 D N N -i -1 m £ rn O m 0 rz 8z Z mo Z 0 00 ?1�' O m to Z Al m Z r m $ �, m m Z m 000z ZZZZ$$$$$ r_ X2F0-22 2c�G7-1 +i,I m-23 m r+ m m m mr1 m 0v°°C7 CC C?C C 0C 0 CO 2 T.I> m vn"I Ong �20NZ l 00x<ZD 3m2G)x OorCD *5 Cl G U v) 000rr-DDgr - tn z0 NC) V G $rte rzA C-p W m p<CG - 7 A r r 0= M Y D a1 c;;p5 ZZ ZZ$ $$$ rrr ZZ 22244770 TI'rt-1'+l m mmm m m �*1 v°°°n f)C)C)C)C)0Ac�n m 7.Fl c CZ00000m>0yZ>Zm �C)<G)OODOpOOAZx_20Crm66z, CC)mI CCCOZrmZDD cmz Z 5€€€ -I-a -t$-IA�C)ZZC7-xf+l�Z mxmxx-im COnZm v)tn°C C� Z I'+7 t�-I '9 ,nr �1 U)C) D7_"1..422 Cm$$D -1 AmN CD- � '"'1 DmD-12-�� =10<Ntn'O-I C7 -i-I C7m�Ar� 3 rmm°mZD Zmmm Em 2O m4ZXaonz-imnmoc,;%1-OOCZi L*10mm;i;mmZZAAm: OZXm ��� 00m� -zfm 0 < <mctpl<*t v"Mz AO c� -ozo �=I �pZ to tno � mZ_g0 0 3.�D=O t0lf A -HZO r m 0 0 z �� Z� m o mA -n-1 0 r z� -r-I C Z 0 nA 0 g r 0 c0i $ m 0 OD ;_ A v C, $m r n m co -0 AC r mN o_c m g> $.a ,-1. ****<<-1 -4.--unwwwwwwowowwwwwommmmmmmmmmm 9 -4 A o < m 0 0 z • o *2 M D ****<<-1-1-1--1(nt1)NtntnWWW0fAV)f WW0V)MAAMgMTIM -0-0 0 10 ND1SOm TAAzCZ�nAT?DZD m 00000002CA�� CgrOZZ-IQ G m R Z� Z ).oR.m2FVOm,,,... ,r1�.O...v.� y - v rt{) Zy o$ nr rho-zimoZ 21,-��*<��om�**]�0„ z°v°mm, Om 0 0U)00 co MO,• 'p to z� A C �O � mZ g A2 a° mo>mcc * y� 7. * m 3 .MA m 5Y m> m oomo > D .= Cl m Z0 A AZ -I _S nZ 0 Z 02 r m'<m m ftl m I r Z Z f) m -1 - G) $0 D Orj Z OZ O Z> m Z m -Z-I 2 z 1 1 A a D 0 m --I m Z w 0 z =z o r m LI , v -1 m..)!1 V Z i vv^; Z zo Zz 0 N r�. v z mg 3v_ MM�° g Ay m� Cl) o m A r 0 0C O SVI Am n a, � A.1 0 n ^'� v v >j° v 0 Z wE ITI ®` t 1 z m rn D F.• > Z YI' 0 W ON U) > 0 ° m m a z � I Z O XI z IN 40 m C 0 71 ° I N o77 O _° Z oo m y v m f r Cl m mZ Z CO N y m mZ v -I V O N o c N 0 �° to m z N m m -m z(n m ° O 1 m 0 Z ° —I � AM m Z m g ° z T j m N O r o Z DU _I A 2 z m O 09 0 �D M� N r= z LAYOUT: CO1 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\238-8954-001 WtrlineOlyOiacovTroii\99Svas\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY raamuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:28:54 PM Q _.0— -- MATCHLINE STA 449+50,SEE SHEET C3 --MINIMIIIME g I O�E -/� T 0P k0 , • \43g-ES S p $ \N IttCl. \ \ \ I I \ P 4 \ N I t o STA 447+84 x \ — \ \ 1 I N \ ok \ I I '..' x !Pc b II{1 m h � �1 I I 3 x8 / I ■ 1 0\......\ ', mP� O 1 N S '4 $_ ! �, , -,._.■' I° S 8 i s 11\ , ci T <m , 11 ° T 1 T 1 --1) I tI j �##, Ii 1`,` Ida; I 1W411;- 1 1 1 L, I ' t '� 11 = 3. z II t 11 1 ° S ° m 1 1 I C 1 0 Z 1i 8 _.It } I 1 444 ti $ t, \ ° 1� I ""� 't ? y v)' , � i I 1-i LI �f r' 1 / ' y 1 �o J I o 1 z ;l / g s`� 1° ■ la- btiA It 1 , l TO t2 / o \N o — 9 1 /! T � I IT 9, o = / / I ifIA c j I / ? II r ; . J.. ,,/,z Z ,,7/ / i m � � z .i r ��%/ / N � 11 1.....,...---...... © ° 1 t In t y y I 1 �► 7 1 ` I I II N I � � ° a0 c° / t m m c m © © 0 p3 -13 2 STA 422+96 I I ° C Z �+ (� MATCHLINE STA 436+00,SEE BELOW o ,,, w rZ g to m m O M Qo —1 ° ° n -I -r, l?� -1 D k z O to T z O n e se , N I,h-Z I rn m xZ m C C) —I I r- w, i O z O W (1) G1 0 LAYOUT: CO2 PATH: U\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtr1fie01 10IscovTroil\995vc5\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18.2013 529:31 PM V ow. d'e• eo 1 r / 4 �P -, © / c'� T ,i / Pb1 ,,, , A 61 / e /</ , ‘4,t-..c''P-\'\\ 1k\ 0 , \.\\ \\ \ \ \\ . . \ . r \ / J m \ \ G o� / `, ^moo \ A = �� Z \ c\ g 1 \s' `\ C / 4.l • �, '*>`\ /` / 1 1 Tea ) I ' z F! !i �.. / ....„ v. II II op Mitts ,a 1 /1/,r. 447 i� 11 / e 7 ,_7 W+ .: . tr.. %.LT ci p / t/ /, ' I I o . 1 l• � P. - / I p rr o I 1_ p. _� S ` � © IN 8 I 1111 1 , 12' 1 /' 1 7! / 19",k, . s \ . ° ce '' /= ir p � / v. m r� ��� \ z mZ � 0 0C Xf \ A z>> p / d Z .4� / / / \1 y kli CI c CD 6, , $: fig •tool XI M O /.. © © .Q�o. -1 tlx CO r: : ;',-; ".. C z 0 1n to _1 • _.1 i �// r- z ��� (n m / M po --4 . / ^CO o o O • ■ Se n 7) ��\ / C yk ST NNN ggR 6s � '19 o v )(0,0 srq '/ CND Z Z SO < N „�# mS 'Z• � 'C 'y o C) 00 n o, Oz ` s . o k LAYOUT: CO3 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrllneDlyOiecovTr od\995vcs\CADD\OWC\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE Tuesday.June 18.2013 5:30:32 PM 0 , m MATCHLINE STA 457+50,SEE ABOVE --- -- ---r- ---�-- --- g I I SNE�..'' 1 � 5 . p. IIG 1 / ' i $ / \ \ SIP 46g+0� tt \ 00_ 'I 0 it$ II \% -0 i I I \ 1 o z IZ .A 1 ` Ix I \ . 4o c 1 c z z ;gy= m T rn to i i it 4r _.. _ _.._ p I I i A t II ..-,p, 1.___________Iff I t/, x g 1 L-71 If i I. I1 ere$ f il { 1 1 • a I I + „ 0 to i 'p ,i 1 II e I FI m 0 z Z © m '� i I m Z tN of I _I til 1 I 7 I �/, I 1 o pmgr P 1Z'_I Tg N I! ! m 1 0 I I gD t* ��11 I I II$ STA 447+84 0 . ti 1 ,y Or Ii I I 1� 1 j z r w 4 + �� > my I I° { yr Q I I ., 0z 1 I I z 0 o I I z MATCHLINE STA 446+00,SEE SHEET Cl - -�.., I _ - MATCHLINE STA 457+sp,SEE BELOW tee'"— 0) m -o m m 13 rn m � cD D 6 v \ r m Z \ z 1, m O C Z p sj ° Z M Q0 N m m M nM cn 0o ,g IT' D ' z n o $ 0 r Oc (p ® N zr" I, co X vy C m n o 01 X O D 0 0 z z LAYOUT. C04 PATH: U. Brem Pro' to Clients 8954—NOSC 236-6954-001 WtAineOl IacovTrail 99Svice CADD DWG PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:34:21 PM U � � lec � � � SO � � � � Y V A S ISe N OR+AM.P esa eeots ow_st ast es'gE. iii SIR 0 Vi t ' . i_ !' w i 4 m fi ++ 11 yam it :,1 '�P T I I r I..111 �' 9 Z A G ` ' D N I Q• 6 — = 8 ,s,,A ‘,4 Z . ` #1, Ng w 11111 . co 2 , I I%! -3 a IIIh y D I p D D k r i m r z yniz ! ga t m 1"m g „NI ,..::::: -..r.,":: ill i 1 9 ' ,',.=•,:c4 o 1°0 r: i it vim' O I a R E 3E.:::;:!,,,:-..:v , 0, .f::::',:;---.{..i. . 1 iii 11, - li 1 11 p 1 ile .. ,— i., s ijj ! 1 1 i i 4 1 41 id 111 1/4 — i'© II JJJJ�`�A 'r iE ?iII;iI I I 7 t �� i1R1 aka; $ _Ho slw ai i S y arD i rt I * YYNNM Lm&c IO COMIN Wf UM MOW 11 'a r J 3!Z 5 i ill -§ 1 \ 1 I 4 g i '-i:ili ___ _mi. 1 110 Tk \ da Tk o �•m + P 5. .., m,.. =,::::: Ell- r � z— e I m m c� I/ 1 Is D g a 3E 1 m n Z 'p o -eE1m.s ' m . *'y CAD 6 ` c) a > 1,, , 0 el m r n Q .4.) I i $ 4N z /,� ® S p 5; 1: 2'.0.I/6 f 44 II + _1 - i S i u) m f Y N r-CMI n i / f h 4 n _, !iIPi1 i gi O . fV 11111111111111117111 1a Aa g i s253 I ;Pit' riiiii 1111 if Ii. 0 1 li i X Z C rnX 0 °� ° LAYOUT: W-01 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSC\238-6954-001 WtrlineayDiscovTroil\99Svcs\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:33:59 PM V MATCHLINE STA 444+75,SEE ABOVE d`L '• $0 aI i, I It .I t ;. Id I • 161 1a U P3 1 AI 0 W Z I2 0 It I 1: r • d rr.. 1 s d IA C a I � C m IP i � t a H L aD al 1 Z a� D a1 p 1 Z O +•II I 3y o v o al 1 P Eai „ 3. r m i z•g �=z `or �s ���is m 1 I 0 oc W f Ill 1 y V1 N rrl T I f9 i s z z /�J / Id N r ° r g° II.a i t ' m co, 38.6' d n 0 :I. N.�. ° �• aI( \\ \\• ��1 N f of 1 k\ \�` a .a ks a x—'L {d \ \ m a1 D I T r i 1p , 1 to 's s ' \ \ Pm �d 4 , • 1 1 F \ I d , \ C, y _ at I { �_—__ ,,, e, v�� r t7 ak 1 / \\ n •y 2 31 i • J 1 \ \°. 3 �. Idp 1 l I �,.\ \ ri) d c, rt l` 1 / t'44 It 1 Id 1 f ` it k a 1 a TRAIL- 1# t. 4 1 o \ a \ I f I * a \ 1 ENTER R.O.W. y 4 . •• �\ \� ap M.P.281.86,50'LT a- a oa 1 1 --_ L i I ` -, / d. 1 F- ,1 t. m • jl 0 z OM OM --L— MO— -- a o MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET W2 a 1 a I ... 0 -4 MATCHLINE STA 444+75, B E BELO F2 C\ m mo ,.) C)4. n , z Z� '��' c —'- `,, C -- =� 0 R-, w; 4Y r 4, . + W N J• m OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO OO O 0 c° W V °1 Ut A W N O ap OD V °f Ul A W N• "°N* Zmm z Z a CO r A C °'I 13 RI .Z/ °s 0o a5 Z Oa -' CIS r 0i* 8 N 8 Cl -° Oi 1� m g E -^� n m x x o� m '� n�r D p v 2 : H; I A° m r�'*l z o ...z ,D co D v m x .�1 _n r- m m ` m F'if z r' R1 O mcmuNi 2 N ° z -1 r ; m g-n x x m FT,* zz r''1mc z 4 * 4 < 0q M 0 1A II r'1 IZrto ID-C�1 m m ©D* Z S z r rN NW -r'� r- --< p3.,is,II om 0r-E Z D (iii)* = rn S W m p m1.7-- y Z n II o0 �A DSUt mw Z 03 d 73 d z m D c,c' v �° m 0. o r-(n �1 ut v o O m r O M m z AZy z m r",1 �Z (n N ,n O.0 1'1 m 70 Z c°Q `4i g1 D i P p `I r=tez Z N xx..1. -9,z Z my LAYOUT: W-02 PATH: UABrem\Projects\C7iente\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtr1ineOlyDiscovTroa\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE: Tuesdoy,June 18,2013 5:39:13 PM V m MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET WI 436+75, SEE ABOVE ° , MATCHLINE STA a 1 orl `a 10 \ ' �Gy°; Ia I 1 e \\ 1 ➢ is �1 * \ • i m lA 1 \\ ` I i I ° 1'1 1 ' I 38.5' Ia TRAIL- o z ,'�, I I id's CULVERT CROSSING, Am r' I : a® SEE DETAIL BELOW o. 1 I :.:\ l . 39.7' 1 M.P.281.76 I )I) I>-0 I . ;• • \ I \\ . ,a, \`\s 44J; ' M.P.281.75 z I I i I 5 I , �` c . \' : \; ,. a 'a 1 Fc III I x \\ a v m 7: o O . m } A I "� PI P2 .I I( r 1 g' Ia o z �c8 ' 1 rn , Ia D C ,1,1 N Z OD II 1 1 1 , /V r#a RI / a I r3 > I I 1Q \ a il f ir ' , .1 ��' � a / a>° g'12 / uZgjZ Am ,i y I I I , . \ ��� I i ° . p 1 - O laa ,i [[o p a; i II I .. C o '° ° D ° I 1I I e pO A a ° ..a w i m p I Dc ri m (a o 17O C o 1'I e �I ( � i o $- D I : I I �q - ( > t r5 Z 'Ii 7 W. OT I N p ° z r P n i ' Fr N 1 rz z a I 1W \ I ` n°; I i I I O v J la r [ A j $ o ( I m I Ia a � [ Iv • I I� 1 I I •oo a, I, ' / I II, 1 I �� � a [ f &' [ i 4I I I // la I ; C la 1 ./ a [ r �/ 1 I ?J I L o TRAIL- // I 1 , I I r' o I$ CULVERT CROSSING, [ SEE DETAIL BELOW I I --�-\ ; I [ M.P.281.72 5 \ \ '. I 1 / 1 I sl \ Pt �I 1 I \ � l� I .\ \ ; T i• : 1 I \ � I � I I I 38.9' I 1 I t 1\ I� I I a I I O 11 1' I I 1 I 1 Id I I� ; I a= MATCHLi E T C._ 1 MATCHLINE STA 436+75, SEE BELOW • z A 432+75, SE HEFT W — co` m9 CD I m 3. C m 5• 0 u x v 0 z v z C7 n O I- m A C > r z Dm < G —1�—___—__ A• • IZ I - , mC„ omm Z OOOOOOOOOO O® ®€G OO 0 Z D R r O m —1' RI v o� z m co co z a� oa r o N rn , rn Z oa CO`_/ �mrn(,��,� -'n-l� mO t�i7<N 3m` -n Z coil m x C M CDD) rp AE z Z D V � 80 T7 zi /� D-op4 0= tmiTZ-Ni Z co m [D v °' m < N Cr) mn n, Z ni . p3 m < mN n O r z F HHi I LI) -XI O m 0 3 r- r°m m _ 2 = czi < rm+T NW m Y TI m .N II Z rCr (1:)* = -, r1 vTr 2.D � � I mN �� pnDp r > v mz CO Z 7) 0 N2H c9ip II -0°o mA ›..xrte CO W z A rN*I D_ °� at C n mm °NN m0 ?20 rNT m N N DZ Z N I N 2 0 0> z m m m Vii/Z o 7L7 Z zM (1'W �v c M C M z rN '1 z rr C) -1{ vo o �L 5 0 O 4° nz � p N ro Z m o LAYOUT W-03 PATH:U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtnino OiecovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:40:14 PM V 5 00.°... ZM 133HS 339'9L+Z£ti VI 1S 3NI1HO1VW OM f11•111 I I.11 7 d SSS o \ III I 9i. \ mm \ I. yc i I_,-;-. \ i_,_ ``,_ \ III 1�m ' I r �,� mA ` -- I:I �° I 1 >m' \ z \ III? -t; T { \\ r O - I n i I I ■ zo I I. i \� n m Nr (I I Z i• I 1 • m \ 'y� \r" \ iii y \ $ { 1 1 \ aoD \ a, II cow z II � : ,�4gti D N m ; LAYOUT: W-04 en (\-'/PATH: U:\Bre \Projects\Meets\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rosmuste DATE Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:41:12 PM Y ....""`. M ATOM ?I SH=T w3 O i / --..,e o�' p^p r O r/ //0°I I m o ,11/ _ / ' I It) < I i g � /� ° ot D c // r to / ./� e m m 1 _ I ' I © z o i /J ° ':r x I ' o i E ' l I e '/ s�/ Nz F,m / :/ i z W + 8 my 7 Tr1 ? g 8C j F1 y p + O cci+ IA N N 0 .� OD .e C, mS m -z _ M ills m -C tp" _ o v --pper .. 0, 1 A O ti ia rt °; � � lb y ri 8 93 0 m �a m It M x Z =I N c Z s Z rna F 0 N 0 o m0°r m 'gym r m m� D xp 01 0 i n mZ n O o Zr ..1 0 z • j v. CD 3 i . w N m V OOOOOOOOO OQOOOO OO O p c , g -0 'SO z� v1 �4s Acs °� Z Z D TI m a at Zl Oi W OD Z co el 0) r n N n 0) r 01 C m 4// r' r'1� �m(7 < Cm7 0' oo O 0s Gm'T O . O N Z '� O-1° '1 C") m m �t O ? x xi +1 t/1 C Z n� Z A y n n " l rn7 ��a m mVmiN�i/�3 24_* SON f r r Z t: A C 8 r m W m N V1 ° /Zl t p M 33.c) O vmi z Z r2 °r° m m ° a' m rn m m n -mi Z -°+ c m m m. n 171 r Leh Z =aA m z m,,m Q z 2, z c°i n ° „ g z mo -t ° -1 m c'S 0 9� 9 cz-ym�; xiO -zi°c� m ° m ° m o �c ° °7y o x O E r., g -t C ` z (/1 N O° y 2 cn 1 'r1 x -„ _(NJ) 1�— m 'T --i' m L m (/1 Z °r Z r 177 f 73 71 NO -9 D ° r „ m ry--�1- '� x m cP M* Z y me 4 G7 M Ti i .0:. Cum N D >c°m O m O c r M m F K S O m rrl to x 0 D r r jm' OA On° i �O ��fl1 mCT Zri2 N XI S O m m X m _►(d) W m z A Z m 0 F- * rO 5z z (al 01. 1"z z v LAYOUT: W-05 PATH: U:\Dram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01 y01scovTroH\99Svcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED SY; rosmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:47:33 PM V m, _ / "'..... .MATC=NE STq —4.50 SE F , �* =ggOVE I S, ..... / ha co PA A r i7o� wort to �. Z�� 1 ?O Jo O a —I e a to a// / 1 mm I I 0 m I o I I I 1 '17 0 L11 A c0 CA D co / 0<µ I to i 0 8 m 71 m O n ca r D C) s b 40 I ' N / 1 z°124 O 40' 0m pgI= // 5 I I o Sm = Oti`a I ' I I o N 4, y S o I Oo 7� g VI W g I Q� O p I T Sr p o rAn <m m r-- f/N N cg o I / m� Z o r o �� t *rn °r Ij 8 L--7() � W 73 J N°' I > _ D ci i (-3 03 N I O to m z o Z ( I 3. .1-1 O 25 I M.P.282.70 ■ y I I N 2. LI mm o 1+ to Drc o I to 1 \•It. o CD XI A 1 i I O tO(04 X11 8:9 nod 1 r R:31 \ * V)0 \ \ 1 1 N°� 1 O \ \ 1 1 1 m Z y 0 O = 1 v1 O D= m I C' < r. I f I f M r g m� I '< ma * 13 or I I )3 m Z 1 z A o D z ..,.,r 1 —� Z '+�..—3 H91dW d1W —/3S.004.v d1S — tl S S14ri �i !9 133$9 3 -''"'-Asia S u"r8 MO W N y m ®000000000 0 00000 0 0 0 0 y mCp .,<„ , Z 'y -4-1 mm m A —1 T ITTT D co m co co co Z 0 i D 0 3 m o o o NN� o Of ` N Oi C O� CO �{'ya p N_[ HHI mco m Vj Y M O Z Z z� O� rAr1 m M to� f/1 n m O NII z ow 1 —1 x n z rn x co i O m C V/0 le Z !wf, ` P I� pO : 9: j m O Z 7C N (n i A A O A 7C rMl* C m Z 77 z Z M U1 D rr1 0 M Z D c� oo 0 r rn O m p D Z O D (12) r� Tz z W LAYOUT: W-06 PATH: U:\Bran\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtdineOlyOiacovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rosmuete OATS Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:48:39 PM 1N dW �� 0 S3N, �l 'L 5 e �gZ 'd1 •�� �` ,•••• MATCHLINE STA 4+Op g 3nOgd� 5Z / \\ _. SEE SHEET W5 �— Tr..' 1 t �'� ) I mm-m a ° Fn (V:\ I\l ( 1 I * °Z \ OD 41,0 Or A -a W 1 1 1 e i a LA N i i I q� v ti 1 1 �► If A T \ --`1 1 (A \I < �• MD O m p 1") I � �� �D 1' ,g r-a 1 \ in A t! � ' °o + + 1 Ti $ S 1 \ I oi D \'1 i m >A1m Fi 12 1 ' ' 1 .r I m \ 1 \ N � Nr I O m pA r= W co 8 VI I \ s � I I g 14. 40' S 1 t� I o \ I • co (304?bip ...a ea ri M I 1 1 I $ 1 ° f 1 V/ Q 1 �( I P r I V, Q \ O.' m cy w I E Z n I \ ,� ' y AI; c I I $1 j I ! © i 14. 1 i ------\/N7 1� I j 1 :9 > f I o > �. rn ..... - ° I 7. ...- Z.�� C Z '101 I I \14*-4 1 owD CT CO g iI 1.6 Al o � o !/ 4 N 1 g - / � 1 0 *x \ o mo -' �-� r _ .Z.Z < 1 m 77 1:1 r / ' 'O r ... \r+�� po = O rn ( m o co / O Oa I CDO �i m0 1� g� 38.1g' w y z � zz ZrD- I °' a�� I 1 ern°m 5 r / �- - _-AIL iM,∎ --'- ' MATCHLINE STA 479+25, SEE BELOW I MAT CHCINE S74... �.., � 474 1.2S SEE S �O Q�0���0� O D d�0 0 0�E z„,moo Co D 1 2 E.Zl --1 z� m - A 01 W Do z co, co, r—0 3 o NN2 c co C Ca• n 0--IO ;0-1'L mtAO > m p 4. — . N 7>pc Si) Z ^� Z D N G7 nc� xs r�-. 't�. a��-i HGI ' Zrn 7 fA*1�m -I m ° f t. t rn m m z x z r- m 1°i1i W m� II pA cp��WDp ? D f) ��Z 0 2 OD p rN7W "L °+1 II 00 ' y m ; C N Cil M 0 0 CO m D= A D ° _ 0 m Z \ pON '1O O N C tm Nr n rn . A D m n Oy mb ZSO m I � m n CO< r OC o o v Z m m m CI m n Z o o Z T N —I 1n pt pm Czm Z m 12)-± X Z 1 C u'D r 00 D N Z D N O li 0,, m Z W LAYOUT: W-07 PA1H U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtdine01y0iscovTrail\995vos\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste OATS Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:49:52 PM Vrr�'/' r J�:W rr_� AI F„ d 1S.I�H?/r•T S 33S`5Z*=`q diS.�'1FIJ Y''-r'� ‘004-0L-v...T _ 9M 1�3H- I'''. \ \ \r - \Ili I \ I / 1 / j m I z i P T ' K t m 73 l 1 1= ' I 1 I 35.4' cy o 4 > R \ 1 1 go, 0 o � x \ L m a c c ? i �rn 1 gg J I I) c ++ Z C,y� ."O /. F pN O O I I� 6°0"i7 I ° 1 D \ 1 ) w <17 CO. I 8 'O I 0 1 I v m L \ 4, CDC gin °m +p _ co I I . N ° z I O o Oo o I I z I CO g 18b N Z I I P 1 I c r , z 1 / G, / a N MP.282.36 o I tioi f elli \ + m.4 p NI Al 4fri!) I 1 1:1.I I � 0 di:::41 I I I g I y 39.7, il i 1 �I I 39' et o I ' I i 4., ii n o 7Z/W ro / 4,.. ZsDZ rm. I Iej O 3§y $ OZO pp N N1q �,z 1 'Jo ig omz, ' N N I gr / 0)Z m I/ g / L2 rn rn 10 I m r� It _� / / m m� j I ~■ m• Xr,Z MA CT NL/NE gTA 465+75 r,. SrA 4�°I o, SLeE B ....i... so FI-OUy z r '�` 1 O Z //�� W N 7' m 0000000000 000000 00 0 0 `✓ t0 W V O N A W N O 10 m V 01 CN A W N I ¢ �tAf Z�ln y mc0 omm Z Z ro ND \ ;Ex, A�� 17M ➢ co m o� co co z G3 c- CO m07 0 �N) r, a) — co crn CO ""� 0 O-10 �(9x min m 3 n ? O Co O 7AC 'rl N z nT z A nn Xl = mm YY ��tn �oNC I� t+�7 Z m X° vCi cNi n '� m co m GNP z = co, z°� C ry D Z=7 O= yz� Z W f,i DO v m < Z W mg -Oi z -Or < i,j < zc/) n m --co rr, Z n m C o Q m C m n N G r Zrn-oF mu A 0 o m m O N O O A r�*l 0 C Z z GyN� oo �zo RI co m x A boy c' °� '1 "��' m - v- Z r rn o '"'h c- mmc rn 1n O Z my z x N m r- - mf Z 2.r —i c n m tn2 r"com o m cz7 rn m �� ? cZi < m NaD 1�t1 TI �N B Om �l-v ? * 2 g -1 m w O yd m r•,) T.'O On ->i --I n 0 W mZ CO Z O P j1 00 �� �St/1 m x fA m -I C n y k v rn \° ,NO "- oFN m co uci m o �1 O O--0 m Z S (n m -1 Z n O N �v O r''1 N M W rZ O m Z ."O Z "4 3 W m m 0 w m (,/).y to nO Om� z m x 0 C m ®z X Z zM toA 12) D O Z M m z to F-> C �A m �� Z n C{ Oo O w rn ill O �D z v rrl ....4 oz Z v rW o l • LAYOUT: W-O8 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtAine01y0iscovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED 8Y: rosmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:52:09 PM V ems/ T 3AOStl 33S_05+£9q tl1S 3N1'iH�1tlW�_,_,._._... �N,�.dW/I I 5 3� y�3N o z � / �s.-� ;a 1 • 1 zii,I \* + \ \•_ \ e o A \ 1 0 al o 1 + 111 < to Ag O D C C Z 2 1 \ N I Of ■ 2 0 1 S - 4. I a. to a gam_ oo uzAZ gm ° n m +p,a A vvv11J I 1 O = tr $ ra i m tw I D tl �O ix \ .• g or ° z I d! ° r I I c ON ' , 13m oa N "0 �' ° I P f. I -I m D > N C i mz i Win■' T1/44 a i \ 0 6 i I l rt 1. MO, , I I ix sla4 T I a o��a. I - ti 39.85' Z AI I 0 3 ; MATCHLINE STA 459+50, SEE SHEET W9 o V= m f1 1+ C) 10 $ < r� Ia m� 71 r 5o s 0 Z Zm0 ...�__ Z a MA'TCHuNE— 463+507 SEE ——— —.- 0 BELOW z ci "ice try CI) g Cy mCN Omm Z OO�OOOOOOO OOO OOO GO O Z I� t0 OD V Of (Ji A W N O VsJ vvtf z� vt m NN N vy m x A m n m < Cm 'y co rn co co z o0 0 co n co E.3 O' Z l lc CZ) O° s N O°. Z ° ""I e C) m JJ m g p -P x 7c to; m A DD C) ..,1 A p.N.{{ r 1�1 Z (T t+�i N D M W Z D A Z C Xi I r yv* OZ mom 0 Z Z c n ° m ° Z mxi -1 b rnN m m A� —{ M° —ic� "'� m o v m p ,r� W v oN o m� X r x m- O Z pr zv 1ry N X N m o M m - v� C a N m yr Z•r m oa c�z N n { E r ° z i=i g r O v c rn cZi z tn= rn tnx K11 Z rn° ? > °z �° z m N N m °o m a 1n 0 W Z z '=1 t0i m m _m �i rn A z m x ° z"� c m� fa o n m �e,o m F a ' O �v -Z ° N LAYOUT: W-09 PATH: U:\Brem\Projecta\Clients\8954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDisoovirail\99Svcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE: Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:53:10 PM V __ 8M 133HS 33S`OS+691►V_1S 3NI"IH3IVIN __ D 3A0BV 33S`OS+SSP V.LS 3NI 1HO1VIN F. 0r i 0 9, I I D rn A xi H 0 ItAn II i D Ig 2N14 V = I to 40' ton z I M.P 28210 .VI S+ I(T 0".WZ im CO ot,, �a Nm 0 f=1 y(-y n (OT QC O Z C O -±- O �Cft TI .Ur m z I N m r0 G O fD m C ( 8 Olr O O ©' 1 `©' 0 D m (10‘44'21 A ii I 1 Ikkt. Or Of t 1$ 8 M s "I iW t o to 3 tO� �► 1 g r i )4 M a z# To& o A 1 12> gt i 1 x MATCHLINE STA 455+50,SEE BELOW O V2 r' 0 -10 • r < r3 coo m n • 70 N < yr I x C0) rnz • .' CR Z Z '' MATCHLINE STA 451+00, SEE SHEET W10 0 z * CD i -0: Z« m 0000000000 000 000 00 0 0 ACS ��m IT1 T. at Oi (b Oo z W c- al, r O o O tJ C C i Oa ` C i C CO V) A D m X x D m �1_ Z N 0 --I � � mA m 3 p A Co A x N� z 3c Ap C� D OCy "(� '9 to!A 3. c- V; .T7 OD C (43.< C. -1 m m Z LA N _ 'O CvC�y, Z A, C m ® �Z �Z Z W n m C o r_` m� O-t Z mlj, < m G m� n or: m o n. m n. 0 Z O �.p+� AO �C\ 0 m o m O p v co oO m> -r, x m-.1 0 C m Z "♦f 1p Nv > v y (4 " vii Al 'i of X ` �` `z� t*1- �� Z r.. Q �' �y -H A v Z r1 0 g m r m* 0 OD C7,Z D C) Z ; G7 x 1 �Z D to +(Oi12 m —I z Dc�1 = m 0 * E z x r- < „i —1 n r (n z r co O rn m m G� m y" y m 171 n 5 �� CpjnO rn D D O m Z N O mz Z 73 co 1 :D -D_(x J rn M rr, D 0 o C `� n 5 0 ;bz 0 t0G .0 F, Q �o To Z LAYOUT: W-10 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\plants\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtdlne040iacovTron\99Svcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuate DATE: Tuesday,June 19,2013 5:53:56 PM V —— 6M 133HS 33S`00+ISV NUS 3NI1HO1VW to to as' 1 I NA I 0 OA z 0 M Ca p .a < I To in > 1 1.1 i c g m c i r a 1 i i- 7. p'q_o I 0 W z S m 40' O m Ffli nC I I I I� c 1 -On I 3* 0 a m rt. O 2 Y A m Z *I I 41T118? M 11't 8 N.. \ Iv. ,(7) g J. A 4. oo O m N t 4i 3 I p �ND�M.P.281.90 rD � 1 1 1 1§t> m Z o'4= I °_ 8. o I t Z � Xi ( 0 > to in• 0 • A• P -< 0 a my X y 9r i mz • n o • mD z it .:t O Z mc0 0mm Z OOOOOOOOOO OOO OOO OO O 0'3 t4: Z�U7'w 1� y� ;OJ -i�'0 PTI D O� rn Oa W m Z m D Oa m O6 m0 N cz T O ,< — Ot c Oi V) CO r L 7c m— O O t�T Z Z �-I n t....,a) �' =tn mAn m no °' x yetis z n7C pc� a z �c7 m -i 0 m r 3 z z x c (A m con) z rn v to z fl1 ® .9z etc.), p i 0 M C ° „ v z MM -� ° �`n �, ^' m 0-`n d r 0; "4 XI v v m v °� O m r mT C m z O O D a A -+t x 3 A N T m >f X 3 r- c- Gi E "S'r'i °r- Z (" O e'* off' cvz z ° Z r= 4 * ^)i < cmi O flI �. tzily �Wm 0 m �' x o; m co z = m= c m y'= '1 (7 r z r_r (y� r m m Net Ifl "�j �� CO,J`7° fn D S in Z DD ° f+m1Z N Z /� C p I*`1 -ai i+1 Im+T :S1 a7 Z m m c ° cn D v O c -n I m> z r- fi r 0 ra m '�cn 0 m z m _ n m v z 0 c Z m , , Z c3 v°iymm e . ° s z mi Cop Z m �a °Z Z 0 W° LAYOUT: W-11 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01)O1acovTroll\99Sves\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED 8Y: roommate DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:01:45 PM m Cll. \ g \ (__. \ \ \ \ ,........ i › i 1. \ a \ zm \ oZ \ o P.\321 1 \-.4*.‘ A 4 O V O O 4 ° 1 \ a 1 VAULT q STA 478+52.8, 41.1'LT I 8" GATE VALVE 1 If Illi STA 478+55.26, 41.2'LT �� t A a 13.56 i \ °x ir13.6 Y \ J D >13.62 rn m m 0 SI v, \ < % a \l P ( D ago: 13.1 - _ J`,'/,/ D D C r r A 4 i 1"N 1 12. 1 l 12.6 / ii '° fig_= r o W.o Ili 13.2 I / , Ot' ( N m y• O j .... 13.18 /: I . II 1 w � g m' I S 1 �� 12.7 a� m 12.69 /; \ \.%4' , ' ro rim go : 12.8 j 1 '.111 0 tv>, c 12.78 69 ) N j C R=lg , i ' 13 A i 13.8 i \ I 1 13.85 r� i ' r (4. eras 13.1 13.11 I N I i I � ;' ‘ " ���°°° 113.1 3.14 o°o )/ 1 i I / 14.2 N! D \ 1 /" '146 14.16 I A A) n - -- --- - I���l10� ji x 0 \/-''�i� r I I �� 12.8 / (4 0 / 12.84 rn i 0 / /r\`'�r,_ _i r-r✓r~ . / x°o 12.8 I cZi I _ ° �r`A ' i�r_/ xi$ �2 .'U II ' mw to / o �i i ;-; N a 13.7 m x 11 A w // CI t f/r�,' I x. All,t1 , in i Or o o m m 13.69 j m j Z o m Z ,J v �`�" di.. -r,. x I x u�r 1 Z m m ��'.. g /� �� ` / r r 14.0 o \ y I m W• y m 13.96 1 t I o ao 11.,g 14.1 II © /rte 141i 14.14 r �,.. , I......./ + k� I I / 38.37' I I 3�a 14.3 IL o I 14.29 0 1 F I 14.1 t I r 14.07 �ll t\ I ; rt 1 t O z y 13.9 \ 11 \1 o �S $ 13.94 1 1 1 1 1 / o I • m r, 13.9 L9�`�� m A 13.89 8• j +Fs,to m0 rw 1 I r r• „H C 13.8 \ \ I D 50 g 13.80 ; l ' z az \ I i • p 13.7 I O z> 13.67 \ f c i 44 0/ • 1c ' Z m 13.6 / / '� 1357. / I 13.6 \ I r 13.55 � v r -� �sc 01 13.5 j A m* 13.53 I `_'J r^m • M om , / r VAULT STA 472+32.5, 38.4'LT Ir- g" GATE VALVE > +. Q▪ r �1 13.3 - - IF1 STA 472+30.0, 38.4'IT r f /* N Z m 13.30 I t$ N M H. 1n* 1 cMZ z Q o� a (1)m n Z O m o �CD i % / O 0 -T1 (1:),!---i N C01 I) "o O � / W to / ® ..... rr / / -1 G) 20 Z C O , ° . = Z mi W Na LAYOUT: W-12 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSCV36-6964-001 Wtrline01)0i oovTro1\99Svcs\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED 8Y: rosmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 8:03:27 PM V I / S / F / / / / c .cis N + + N (a / O O O O O rr 1:7 m� / /298 Ri 29.84 I R VAULT c. STA 10+31.5, 40'RT " / 8" GATE VALVE F . 29,0 ` - HI�'�Y STA 10+34.0, 40'RT / A 29.02 - I I / 1/ m 4 28.1 / Mp•?,•` g 28.15 , m b p / ,. / .7, / / vA tJ r, ›27.2 �D N / 6 F x2 2722 /Il 26.47 / I / / 25.8 I 25.78 1 / I _ 25.0 I t > "_ s 25.00 1 =m / 1n f No m A gS 24.1 �1 I m m w i S tai 24.15. I vA / i a,1 I D n / n /// �rn 23.6 - l �� 4 a 23.64 r I r caw !m I /1 m 23.1 23.08 R.,1936 9 40 I RN 22 63 / r z ;! 1 9. I /22 _ p I o l o I cn 21.7 il 21.71 0 I c...1 m � o Z m '� z 1 I 21.3 I m 21.34 i 1...,° 1 0 r v II #`7 21.5 I '� XI V a, s 21.50 i g;" 1 Off' 9 's p°o I ���� Yz- ' / -c'^ '`4� v IV 0 21.1 I' v ��/ m 21.31 J w R1 g 21.13 j iD o &Ni m I p r 1 m.8 I 1 276 , 6 $$-2f ce 20.3 It Ng I m - , m o 3 � 0 20.28 m A o ���1 C I Co r C Z / I U 15� II I �W I m 0 C 0 19.7 j _ zo I v1 N N 19.69 en v m 1 --I p N 0 p -a 1 •` 19.2 N� 1 p I z 19.20 z I o z I ' p n a-i 18.8 f p 18.78 z I 73 Z. 1N rs 18.4 \-`1 w II C) r__? 0 18.41 i 1 O g 5 0 A 18.1 _.. \ C•\ I ' x 0 18.06 1 ' m -I m I 1 O i 1g 17.7 17.70 O z 1 17.4 I I 1 17.35 I &) ' \ 1 I 8 +` 17.1 c 17.08 \ I O y \\ I -I , I \ 11 Z X11 16.VAULT STA 3+73.1, 41.5 RT 0 16.62 - - 'F'' 8" GATE VALVE N C 1:"" [, I STA 3+70.6, 41.5'RT 1 00M 16.3 16.31 I X 73 1:1 rn x mm 1 \ r^ \ 0 i !! �, N -I, m 4Q a) \CC,np \ O r z r" e--1 \ \ \ 73 Z e \ret W \ `' LAYOUT: W-13 DETAILS PATH: U:\8rem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrlin e01>01scoviroi1\99Svcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:04:58 PM V a :• w N ;-` Z 0 _ _ 0 4 g Z X Z 00 •� I —4 O --I �Z m o r =--rn jr.; —1 F m� to I I ° o 0 00 -1 z c) m 0 —4 g 0 I m N T1 m C i O N 0 Z N O A 0 o z z z z A. ( v°7 A v m'- 4 A 4 A y• --1 [A -IA -i r RI D. z > �\D. I 4 /• 11 S- o m CO m r z ' + frn' Azr T o 1 - — — ®- — - — D — — — Irtgli i n r.. C IZ 4 r '� z 4 - - A m °A 4 ��. \\ II IIII -a \ - m cl j iLt2 s v� 4 o Z= Zz r->1 F x jn n 4 'I cn N 4 0 4. C.1 Z bS o a 7c8 0 0 XZ -n, i D C Z N c AO _CD m A _ I o +�1 rn Z D 9' N + =00 r c to <W I I I A o D 0' co t+'j z W c_) 0 rZ) IM111.■1■e1177■ to N 3 X /nN Fzz "o% Om o SF' Z ONSs = S c.,, ? .'t S I 2c C co 0r n O- a A £ 4fsp! -H A C) Z OPI c mm Co A� r.;PI U) N O 00 D m El °o o v) o D '0 e D m m r- _ °D NNrn '0 C) z Co _O \ 1cZ 0 xe m m O 'O \\ �tai a D ni m': 'O j I N r. -0 D.m �r*1 at J Q ntn n _ < i\ ',,o f m am �n� te Z f7 '0 A A D Vj. m c)Z C� ,� vOi6�i = f<*'1 I+ \\ =O r- -Di �n GO Z D m 0> 0 Is: Q I rn II C.'5.041 'lzr� NCO 3e 10 \ Z0z r^ p ,z m •r Of g-5143 O\z A ".�o m A $ a Rat c>c�o 1. �m "�" * �D6Cn <nlny m 't ='A m DmF Bz z t>r 1 m Ct G)AZ z m m m 'O m 3. g c - w F '4 Z 1 . Eo1 E� (!s m i�'ti■ w4�s'� > Dy w 1,',,� ...... ro, 0 m \ 0/ Cn -C ' N I r a� xr 00 02Ov �/ L 1 el�y, vZ wcn-> rtn =r 5m zi zNr�, 0 �// W A� >xi. {yNy/cr ��g Ca m*1 °AZ xr AO° roz W A :/ 1!/ W = ri*X� A) 00m Zr -<c m(yy).. AlA °A-rG c m :\ . �� < -Zi A O N D p� tNryN Ar r / Z rn O-0 ��0y N— ZA 9 z -.T O7) 0 / '0 �tl/ z O N C O x 0 > ", m "z n 0�z ;O j Z A=m < m N� C m _„0 < 1 3�-mAi gr�' N� C �0 3 �ZZcf r r5+' A p A z C2 c) 3 a Z l�ilp m D 9 A O Fn Z 2 _ m y 0 m r-3 w -, N JO 9C)v DA. S O= __ { Z_ rn m -4 2 Dzg Cviv � D H CO rnc) X �z�l m �n m< to �•e C < .'a> 0 z g m 5 D< "r�i D �� mv Ep y� z� i vv �� z mE 5; M ['� mm D-I v r0-^' 7° C) >A O >rn zm m 0 >0 m0 -I0A m c A rtz� m 0m g w m z mz 7)zz z--nz to"v -�'+ y = > > ai m -oi it �c�m err= w7 e - m o ZA I vm _1 Z ,.tr -r-n Z w0A —I-. f= *0 f *000rrn 0 DmC c)� to oZ ''0 ppNpO 0MI 0 0rg I ' z �{ CO ➢rT = O�0 0A OOP oA=O OA1N i,, rn rn I mOD � ' m0 O�� ctci, m CO�mC� c�>>A rt 3 z ' --1 Dm C AA co mms 7)m vo 1 0X0 1 C)-NpO= z z �. 2� .d 0 (al A Z my m 0v)V)3 ON A tI 1 �v o wC. m w-{ co Nz CDtt ° ° CA N c�< °°oz °°�zf z C ♦V 1 _ -{ A0 C) m o z (n m c s.N ! c Z' o;r m JD v' a `° C) o At°`DA °O` 0 JP . °D° N'1 r C) D -01 c >r >r� oz z o z o z v z v m m XIW N ,. N 0...1 O C)A 0 C)A pCr 0C)m 0 a Lm Z F 0 Z01CzCpD�� �� A°�c-�F vnvv) vv* m;0D Z co 171 Z Z O O t^ m �nrm zm't zm 1 zm� zm-1 z at a O m A A m Z �� tnv tnvz U)O tn0 n I O > '0 Z> m = r O �0 D 4 0 0 P m N -Ti <A 0 Z m m m O m > Fr,-73 z Z *Cn?7 gv)�T z-iDAC>n z-I>5) O Z 40> N01<,T z Cc) =ou, =o? 0mom-Zg �f'lnm..,-,*D �—A N oN zvm n zrn n Z mo-' --I-=1 rn ° mO= m2= m= c�--1 m=--000 1 0 O O II IV Z 0 Z X=O) X O D D C AQ3. M 0 - :-I`LD grxrm c Ul o rm D3 —I m §5`v 4a-� 0ovm cz)og vmDmV1ompm� vm' mpm� �Z Z O S A20 pON OOtn Or�mmyi mOD yW� m A C O 7) C D A O pg 0 �� Z m�r � r � f+7)'1�D � DmmD N-m CO m CO S 8 r- Zm Zm 7)r Oz0 '0rlr 0ZO 7) -11 O r OI A j OV A i r r w 0 LAYOUT: W-14 DETAILS PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-OOt Wtrline0l)OIs ovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:05:30 PM V 5 0 0, Q \ mv) v\I .. .8 \Iw i x I N�N sD A(1 8 4 m m mm7_> Z °x° Z �5 \'C (� N 10 N m 007r0 A o? m x �m --i-0 O m *D �� Dx12 -I O Z o SSRe� _r_zn W V) '0D O Sm y >;3.zp? Jv pN 4 to CO A m G3z ii ii rn o OON� W[n Y �x I'rt Z ...I �O 1111 D O' I I .. NO \ 0 TArt p ao r r m o o I O O Z ; m m v c 4. m _ t z tTi z 24" CO 0 1,07 x �°' VII I ........„...../..----m I t _ _ � I I S F,PI p o IIIp I ' a c� x xO I;' -a4 — t —1 — — IZ IB a z :r A _ g cn m a Vf I 0 L Y-m• W O Z I I ,, z m r I �G z < 1 y/ n < N 5t.-n m X C I 0 OZZ ZO�inY.s AA H O D�1 tV AC'3N$ rC x' a, D v- 'W my{z 0a,tr 2 A7D .,,� �p �Ot� �gN �`* �Z zo*v p'o w;== Z tN Oo $ N A z m0� DOO --< �< 7,=lo I �m an -(m Y I -e m p AZO mD r< ('7 co o ° �2 mN �< r t� f Z m 5� Dm _1012 w A _.p y ov -1 v s (7 m m -( N Z co Z-t $ w �€ r- -m �� _� 42" _ m° x oN q1 mm co A to O n 84,„ wir,-.. t7 o 5 m x m p rr A -'I n: c -- 0o i 'Y' N co CO Z La * 1.. N\ I) 1 Ai O fl1 C m rD _I A CO. III i �' C r , ,\ n =— A 1+I m , x r . Z /I flu �(. A .• z D g n, 0 c}� _ = = rIm =I,,.I4 ® y III A=�.I`� —r I o O 0 O z g xi > � v Ii Z m _ Y Z D a O• 1 O -I <0 111 9" MIN o< xl-< o rr <, Ira im ' O C y cn A w N dye rt m m III < Z- Z Nr0 -- <• m> otnmOmoz tno m �x .O r" r^ 0012°00O0 ZZ coat'''. cZi (n OJ` zGz� . •�_=' �1 �V) D ;0 a DA-Zi�Amm CDD C 03 4 mrr- Z• fn m 011 rtn6�X000�2n., r O-i x . ■_ ,I11,. AA 0 E" nC-4Ytn0rOW0D WWNNNN 00CDAN N- � r O my 0 OmOx 1�7r0 [A 0OOAN000 CO AN0 mm m m _ — Ni Z f�rr77A ZW • �i. com Z �q n �NNO DZ 0k,, 3 OA - O 0010 0 xcaD�G�c o cA �� vm Z o G -Zi ! !; 1» $ �5 _N rn(7f A W N N-. -. ∎I A W O Z 0O V AACn O,tONO� (o!® I p m — C Or Z_i-I � mC !® I "! Z CO) rpz -.ID 0W W �lNA W WN W ... �O7A ON G] ■∎ -1 °? — W 7100-1x,1rxlm m' -N+ (NJ'V 01 07 V to t17 rO A 0 ST O D C D 12 0 O pzc��7'-1Z� cr ''0 N ?O (� �� l'l c t+"t o v t°7 a 0 0 R°o Q to<'7 O P f7 N CO tr W CO(ND A O W N CO 0, A N�k3 n D W N fn m III g m to �O p L �NGZ')? ZN y m al N O_. 2 D v rA C D rA 1 r'Z 5A ANN-•-• -• -•00OLO W N ...-. Op Z rm OMZ n to to com -I-iM--I fn W mN Z OCO AtA tT WO O -r10S � Nt�t^^ZA A3 ZZZ0n m�0rmm W W N N 1 N IVnpm3 Orn000-, it 01_, m m m�m o 117 mMo x c=r)M. R°f� 0� m-° -2 0 iii O JI +1 II 0 M8 r- EW m z h m $Z tAj7 Na A N t0 CO O' CT as W W N ° yO CO >-Z..1 N m A m\ -<74 X 2-4 0 GZ7 nC v O �F0 f. 0+112 mZf�DD r N .ZA1 A0S AmTr1 f'O r.I-- 0 O--Irmoy rAD 00 N r maowA-1 tnXDOO .r- (/� {mNny p c) C : : : "' N O O O $ En *-t-' NOm0tn mi ■ O N'rl m \O m r W O, W O V N A W Z Z Z y x W��Nr I�t+TT+77tm�7pZ A O Cr ` AZO 121212 r/1 ,-1002 Co m-;0m ve n � z1 r- o 00 f- c m m Ox<� m IM — O N z ZmOm� N� �W mZZA Z n Qm in m...„ . o0 0°°orm vnl_ o 1 , cn N _mco $° °°° ma gz� �� --I zm�tnm fJ� ADS u Z Z �r C O D,V NO O A c X '='"I 1=-I 0 -n Z o W LAYOUT: W-15 SECTIONS PATH: U:\Brern\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtriine01 y0iscovTrail\99Svcs\CA00\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: ronnuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:06:31 PM V w q c o °' c g A 37.64 / / u / -Co 36.03 m r 1 t1 I PO 1 13.42 /� D I n I A 36.03 0 x 10.25 �1 I 0 0 �/ z 35.66 m m_1- /1 - czi 4 it m m I / °> I ` I r I t 34.19 I_ \ m ` \8.49 \ $) 2 ( 35.85 f \ E 70 D 1 tl! m °> co 8.63 CO . i1 i 93 Z r m m 36.45 °o I1 in N �a� t z m x t 1 x 'O r If �53 m .� 8.7s o� 0 mom n If ..4N No I : tv �-+.N 0 !,373 11 �a -11 � A> 36.41 II en' z �r - ___-1. - P ter) ( Zen I Ii or 8.90 -� °may I II _ _vci Dzr m I 36.05 _ �J ii N� 03 G;rn°D• fl m ' f/c a 0 o- _.35.18 .53 I I1 °- °� m -8 w - I 11 rn w II win .:. I mrn ! // x 9.17 N j x - L1 ' o' I //( z cn ¢m ro�D$ I 33.93 a I // ° o 8.79 m o I I * c-a m I �� z (i -4 30.75 1 / 1 I I m are�� 8.23 m o 1 m 1 I (1. I o 29.39 m o i - .6 �D" 7.65 -`- - -�°o LP OX 1 CD - - -w�j-�._-A:I 4- --1- 1 0 o 28.90 s I m \ z E I z 8.74 xa I I oW 1 q a fM o c 28. 41 0 4. g 3°zF = y oaDL 4 O C '� <<5 en mmfrn 1 ; mu) m Di�OS 3 =�, _ /t O DD 0 co FII mgy n mk t 12.01 mau I- b tT II c'f x 1 ^r r- .1.1..Zrn 0 o'�am °'m D m I El omm i A cnzi° C 3.22 N 17 Aa .- -m D;- -- '1 - -� 1 z x/8zi I I vN /I n V1 �''4 3.37 I 10.48 \ oX 2' t r- ' \ -4 I 3 \ N 3.32 N z 12.07 I I \ i o I I 1 1 rn mrn 11 I A Fh of I I -I Z ro� I 1 it a 3.28 13.01 cn�in 1� m sc " 1 I �." *CO i i Ii w w o m 1 - I I II 72 Zw 0 73 3.55 I 13.44 �� 1 i ` - W m n R I o I I i 1 m r z 1 I I II I S3 > I a 1 1 11 I i 0 Z g --3.91- i o� Al 13.86 1 � 'I o m C 3 I ,,$ °9 1 p �� C <O UJ' ' a I N x I I 1 c 0 Z <z N �� I ma Nm --- - - - - 1 - r�hi Z r N RING - - - -I. - ... NmZ�Or N nN I I I.1 • : o 7.4 O 1 . - 4.19 I �O � �> 14.30 �1 I 1 Z II'it- Oco I n' ZCp I I ii Uo Z �A 0 0Q �o 1 1 II rn rr- N I I I x 4.37 I z c�N _ 1 I 11+ = co 14.76 �, D W m rrmn I I (I co. I I J r I �' 1 r 1 1 II o mm 4.50 l\ 14.90 I i 1 o rn C7 -1Xi ® 1 1 O r 1 I__ _-7 i NZZ 6.01 ! 11. 14.60 z Po zi M Ca n Z 6.05 14.37 N m X II p 0p O - r ado• -T- - - x- 1 Z m XI `v --! $ czi co o O t0 -6.05- - - - f V 14.16 !f, u ..44, -H O y 'f 0oZ D 1 m � qJ 6.03 13.71 1. -i 0 D Z C C7 _-I C C P o a - o 0 1 Z w LAYOUT: W-16 SECTIONS PATH: U:\Brem\P,rroojects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrait\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste t��f1DATE: TuesOoy.June 18.2013 6:07:41 PM q E. + O R V Q} - 1.' O F., 17.55 ®m i ( _ 16.63 0^0) /7/ q 0 0 N° I + I. z I $ 0 / I 14.06 I * 19.43 °> m rA"C 13.83 Fri Q'1X mA ytm °Z >-�-1 19.39 ° ®x n o z n II. O w g 14.01 z m rn z c-i N° Z t n my 7. P 1 P s . m 19.46 zD of G �0 n .. '. O 1. U7 UD rn a z Z 14.27 8 1 a III in 0 I -� ry Z Nn 1 �� 19.54 I 0 I >1 L 1 m 14.69 1' A3N M + S .. . - --I .4< 19.34 .■.■...■ No Z C c g;10 15.04 zz= 00 -m I x I rd'i?co N 19.10 B - Ft a I rpm• 0 'r s g > Na 0 W° �I W A I 1a 15.01 } w ^)I Y ii 16.57$ q e o Ai 4 o 17.96 a 4 r CI 17.64 8r44' & 15.30 I .. . I 14.98 1 I 1 14.24 Fri A a m Q- ') =A 14.01 4+z '7 = a Z ° 0 O) m� NA a� / r41r' N -I . C) I z, ro =� A< C) I N . -0.7.1. Z c 1 12.27 II- ®x > - tl..� -n <D0 >- X e^� F4 g W ZI Z 12.07 \ 1 .p 1 G) \ my aS -/ m m 1"y 9 \\ co co 40, f • 0 3. se 15.47 \ t e '0 Al 0 �� v m \I + - �� I z m o I m 9 - C) 11 +; 17.34 czi °o N 1 m m V �,) .... II ......13.51 ... is,z 11. n I 0 Z J o • o_ 0 q 70 E p= No 0 o 14.01 II o mr & ? ° = 4. 1 m _- A i 14.25 o \0 to = nz 17.01 I -ai o \\ 3 n 1 15.72 \\ 0 m z �� I o �qwm \ nZ 3 16.72 A 74 p II N n .0c 1 rn0 Z I �1 O < 16.78 _ I r I No Z.54� � mo y n Of 16.90 _ I oO > I ' +y 16.19 1 I CO m I * m 0 N 16.68 I a I > I = N p m 1� 15.59 C) p 53 A Y.p I -I < 1 Q 9°9° O �,A 16.53 ®m I ®x II N ).. Ln o Z y A 77 m• / I >� , 15.00 Z +•9 °O I rnzc5 "� 1 p s 1 m ,:i ° ,. 1 II m _ z1458 O �I II I .�..n� o e o 0 Z m 16.72 n 11 c CO M v 17.04 0 t .a °m z Z CD W° �. o -' At o C'. 0 - LAYOUT: TC-01 PATH: U:\Bran,\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrllneOlyOiscovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BE roemuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:09:03 PM III V n 5 1e F, D ;p O .1_m p O D. v -m - v a ' v O D 6 °O J xt r _z v Z r Xi N min=m z 4,�N ig Ne w A gs Cl) $ 8 BF tN r 0 ° ir G °A 0 , JoN, Illy go 0 M O °e' Z 0 77 A V ii D z O o��° _n Z + D r m+ C7 v Z rn I4 S$-,, _a is 9 rp^A� Z y m F6▪ > O ° o 0 •D o r • x • r CO mL, • mD g yr i no Z • m n • 0 z 1 O Z O zi O �aZ0 N -0 rri O M —0 m v 'fl . CO 5 ? W N Z 5„, i 0 0 _� m Zp g_ Ws CS E Z mZ 3:i I'm co m Z ° tr 8 ° rn 27 `` N� on, ® �JJ yo m rn cm 0 O (Co ,'441 won N N m= ir O CO O 2 —1.. N Z O m z o m a cn O y (n j ]} z r om r-c —) 0 O CO O V r Z S C _ rn Si) - m r al °i ut —i ®RI * D N •' „" Z - w o wit 0 LAYOUT: TC-02 PATH: U:\&an\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOlscovTroJ\995vcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED 6Y: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 16,2013 6:10:15 PM V -- MATCHLINE STA 448+50, SEE ABOVE --�_ -if. ' 0 A § I o Io g Ig I ' 1 cn o o_ 7. 1 I $ 1 �t I A i I3 � 0 a T n G _. -.l 1 T • O p A 1 I 6 2353 S° Es o fi c ° Z q ; > Z ( ° o m ! IjI ,p l G n -r1 Z I I I I N p Irtrn2©' T Z 12 Om ° ° o 0 JOxN -a li 17) 844,ro ,ii . 0 I p }E $ a N 11 °' C 1 -, . 1 � I o p x I !IIfl p t I To O 2 E3, 11\* O 2 ° V= m ! MIN 0 -1 O \ \p I r o v3 mo CD 5c 7 = n Z I In cn I}## 2 Folt lik.\\11.O I Ig Z _. S 0 CD i � � II N � I O fT' --- I _�� _ " ° MATCHLINE STA 449+50, BEE BELOW 00 w N , z C n Z g� mN m� gm m � p M Z O o A? cN mCZy >A N r n 3 O D _'I .1Z g 1A-1 O x p 0 I o m vm �m tn- to *m C7 >n N m mT Z o oo Illii, a 0 MATCHLINE STA 443+50,SEE SHEET TC3 g 7, z W °°° -1 m> n r r> -I Ai O Nmv '" In51 m ;V:1 z z 0 = m No PC LAYOUT: TC-03 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NO5C\236-6954-001 Wtr6neOly0iswvTran\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:11:15 PM V TTS MATCHLINE STA 436+75, SEE ABOVE MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET TC2 a 1:\ 0 1 y I \ '\ 11\ , ���/it ' ._ ,, , , _ _ 0 T- . I . MIN 1 i i I \ I n I z -t I \\I I 1 o o o Im r to g D I. —\/",_ i I —_� 1 I ► 1 0 p JO,�� i I O , 0e�l I e I I 1 I Qey I o~It1S to fi � I m I o I M c I 1 I o ^-1 o I 1 y o Z i(1)3 Z � � I z o -±- ill 1 LT / I 4. i )11. 0 t a 0 0) t \I _ I. WI hil r ( li c . ■ ,, \ ° e= ;I . -1 I 'i \ a \ q I L \ , 1111�dZ `��1 iI �/ 1 i ,1 , g x.o m jl 1 i 1 / { z_° i I 4p l ���' m mn i x { m> If il 1 2 * // MIN a �0 1/ s• m� !/ ; n f It N -I 30 l Z Zr Ig ( I ° ■ a \ \ 1 11111\°..___I l p igh I 1111 J // 1 MATCHLINE STA 436+75, S BELOW 1 ii 1 1 ti d,Z $c'p I _l 1w cD—I 1 1 c nz x MATC�jLNs A v m °; E=R o E rA , n I n 75 S EE SHEET C4 Q 1 N N o p D m m U Z �rn °4, Z v ITI _ -ir Z O / U N C z - 0 m Ur 0 ODD y —ni 0v Dz cm (7NiS ma n rm' rD ZO co 0 91 z'l ZZ -`DO m �'0 co w. ® z m 2 LAYOUT: TC-04 PATH: U:\Orem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-8954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTroi\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:35:32 PM m ° z�dysSi ..isS , \ , Ar14,1%4 a \ s_ \\ liAll " \ t I \ It 0 • °DS \■ so o. r7+ -1 \\ 1 i !®� O 1 1 till% 8. i a l. ® \ Y >° Z°z I �I\\\ . m0 %Oki C, V 8 r,',1*, o 1 ■ r $ o zn � 1 ®� _£Ol 133HS 33S `SL+Z£i►V1S 3N1-1H31VW g ro m rte" \ 1 ``, ��� , iln o z m z �` 1 "..,. J83,04144., CD \ \ PONI ;1±; i 101iTi a �v i t Z 73 P3 I v i I I/Il\\ Ilia% , 1 , it,_ ) ; P4M..... \ , , , I\ 0 1_p, 0 . CD i X i; i Z ii. N I I r- 1 11 pr N m / ) Rig.3, pti@„. I 1 1 1 411,1\1\111 a Imo' \\ \ ` %' 1 i \ \ Iliall i 1 1 %% M Z - \ 1 ..� {...� 1 O *_ ' MATCHLINE, SEE SHEET TC5 i - ,' i o• � I 1 m• r3 i o to mn I t A my I ‘14 0• m• o I I V kts i `i l 0 1 41§1plip C 1 z is MgTCy`'FS `®� I �,4 Tq 11.A. 0 0 CID I ' w N Z r O O Z CO °-_, mN mp 2m R1 171 —{ oZ M(4 vz Dv t D 70 _,C)� ZN 0 M0 30 o �A gm 1- Q rC 1 A m o CO �m g m "7f c O D wm ^' rn m= Z M m Z =1�-CO 0 0'---I 0=NM DD= 2 0 m -1 ° C Z zW o Na Dm A o —I ei v g o m ..I a, mz n �} ,- c A O -1m y m S N-1 N f Z C 0 z 1r1 0 LAYOUT: TC-05 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01yDiscovirail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY ramnuste DATE: Tuesday.June IS,2013 6:36:34 PM V s 5 g ...►•..411,7AT CHCN yE I SEE •SHEE ,' 1 ®� 1 C4 "`�. i ®% ,_, 0 o 1 / ♦� ® - D //) `. . , I ®® 1 ®• ,n i ,_4„ , � �, o �► RFm ®` 2 1 i �► / 2 r �► i ® I , ( � 4114114.<1** , F,Zm / 1 to (Ix+ Abp= /,,�/ o 0 a 1 fm1 AC j / 0 7. p4p ,1 / .,,c, , to ,/ / °a rTr1 \ m 9 , m royh-I le � o� $ ~ xi i el 40 i q Or\ • -c `��ee II1 sob 0 JP 0 0 (' ti ti y 3 ooti O X oti iii o '1t 0 ;gaf 8.p. 0 Z n XI s 0 Fii D O -.I 0 r�r rE v my 31 Er i m csiz n 2 P .1 0 z n 'e 9 m0 CO p i Cd; �. W N z r 0 �'V� pH .\�® Q Z7 O c' e mmo ymt vm sr+ C7 0 mn N gm 0y 1 oN o m %U Z _=p > o °z r r) m C ZW p to1-rn , C) Z 0 rn 01 O 0 o f P y A 0 0 0 2 rn LAYOUT: TC-06 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTroil\99Svcs\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY roemuste DATE Tuesday.June 18,2013 6:36:02 PM 0 (" II 5 1I 0 1 } /% ©, /( T � o / < // / 1 / 1 9?'I�2 if' 6 ° / Z i / Oi ► / i AL _a ,� r Wiz_ I • I o m fi _ I W + Q A / / I `$ o 8F o' -on 1 1 0` i f / / / / I Jox,, / ts94 ti i ,, Z / m ti Or\ , 1 i 111111M1 / I ii� 1 1 N¢ I g mac / P= / p ra J Mi� o Day m ' % ;1c� 0• m� ,, xi r3 ® —mi 0 a xp• F S, � D So 0 cn ;mz n g o z y O , a %� z it ki -b 0 � a a z 0 .,,� \i o o IIIIIIII -1 • ?;:i C.c4 III4 0 v :''. W N -. Z Cr. Z �% � � mO OM i mO m 1i "4 1J © °z 12 mv N rn= la —1Y A O D O O= C Z z W 8 m 0 D m m --1 O W z to °D < o m m 0 19172 n p r-> 0 o z 0 f rn In C �/' ® i m x LAYOUT: TC-07 PATH: U:\Bran,\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrhne01yOiscovTroB\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY. rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:41:15 PM V 1 S _..r /- ''`MATCHL 0 '�=ESTA8, 0 °- �SO SE Ps" ,,,,- .. / 0 1 ° , m 0010,00, --,,0 // / 3 9 : W ° s 1 NIP .... / fillirj 1... rtil I ??, I 1 m ° Q F< z o o v /g I oso."000 -o 8 o i'1 � > 6- di / — I rerr 4E04 / d 1 .7.4 ° -. I r0400/0/rof, v silo r., I >;Au...o=m $ I �� t ° II w i 8 i> 1, 0 ig . .7, •$j ' // ØØ I • o te; are4sellik. (., en a ,i s��' � m v �� - �� Z a z o z my , 0 0.o A 4 / o 0 o /_ C (1) °0,01*°000 Ct 01 W C �® i1 1 I ®I m 3 0 ��rn i ,110 rn k vo 0 \ 1 13.010° 1 ,��. I 1 III ° w/o °W. 1 a I #101 1 \0 2 Nlh / O / z 00 o m< 1 �/ °� 1 1 < z" a mr Lp N T 50 m / 2 C1 Z :iJ A 'I 1 \.1 of E-O y , /z ..j r rrl o / ••■i i.vvt 1. ....1, ,-wo°°sass ge13N ___......._ � �dS 0g+8 U) M...—se.3 O c z = o * °o _ Z m ''"1 m RI c m� � 3N1H°� z ay g3 o__ m Nu) Z *m —I ^ z o oD -i N C -1 m A -1 O FD D < pCm —I 0 r" 7 P �= z m m r- cnv f k c -.1 k° 0 = m x LAYOUT: TC-08 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Chants\8954—NOSC\238-8954-001 WtdineOyCismvTrol\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 8:42:15 PM V ____MAT STA 4+00 SEE SHEET TC7 1 7 I �;I A d . I+c al 0011/"-- ■ l 0 d 3SS it I 3n9 mU I 2' , + ® MIN ®,:o ® � m � \ 0, o®� \jC4 t.., • m /1111 0 00111 tAti El 0 laili.1-10Wr* \to /0 . 40 , „ \% a + 0000/1111. 1 Ig 0•11—_, ow E1 *F.,. , \ 0 ..... > 5 \ 0 \ D = I Oa 0 0°®® ®0111.o ° ° I 00 ØD 01® I 1 1 CI g. 8 614 go 0 ri \ I 00,Y � ' \ Wg 3 p. O n I -o \ _ 8 op Peg.° 1 a ( ‘ t ® I .•�. ® ° t // fi cn I � o CO� o ■ ®/ 1 •Oil awl 1k 1 � V > 824 e 0/11111011V01 8+c N ■Z Aill■ 612 tow,t, I Z J ° ■ N. 'ma ® A ii I I I .�° tty (N 0 % Fli o ° I ,�,. m o \ , ei-00, '/ 0i_U: I -0 .I rdi cl AI ° % I 'l:.8„ . 1a / i , m 2 r71�®vat I wow •••00... $Y to O 6 afflpil I N rn 3 NowTs I ° I il .0011111e10111114, ! poi, Z c - i �' o > xi I o�' r ®• cd • k,FI 0 ro- 011111111 _.--- , ..--7. \ rill uml°1111. 7- �m X r)Z ../ 00 x 2 M 0 il....____________1_____4 j A z .Z.i r 1 �-2 ' r1 c t 1 1 / ° MIN I r I p / j ®� Cr 0 7 , p011. 71 , ,001 , . MA TOL,.4 ■® ' �l ° f_ c ESTA / ® gi D 4ja+25, s SH_ ®� I F”) I —I Co SET`9 -- •® --+I -- -- C) '11 .0 MATCHLINE STA 478+75,SEE BELOW m0 w N -- , z C 0 Z of iV1 >o f= .O r Z O SS n m Z m =m DTI m CO XI —{ Om ;N rnn ;� N-r� �Z o� C zm O O0 �, m= cz r .ZJ O :11: mAv m vZ im o °m o o �r N 0 m CO p O.I-ri m FPI OD w ® 2 m x LAYOUT: TC-09 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiecovTrall\99Svee\CA00\DWG\ PLOTTED BY roemuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:43:15 PM V g .dis 3NV1H�i% £33HS 33 r.np 9 33S pp+OZ T 0 , —�_ 901 o ilif d"1 a / z 1 J/ o/1 0 1 fi ' �® NIY� ' 'T \ 0 1 1 T 1 1 o A cm F. . . a -\-& `\ g \ 1 NZmg Sm n rnP17pI o p 0 cS A yx I s m5N r. 'z�, w f°o I nC a o 1 o N i d I ` ,=a ° Z � 1 I i �� / `r gek // x t��'tom! C I +S I‘... f, IIl I 4 , o I , ?I/ I 1 I r. I w I Iy il/ill r i tD It lid if ' i x -. .. 1 #./ 1i t?, '0! MIN N 1 a z I °z ; m Z i ® I ` LINE y P o 0 ' Tq 47p*Op S��. c0i 3 n ' EE BELOW — 1a v / i - z S 0 o ' / ri /I 0 ,..... x m 0 r mo , r Ca $ W N C O . flflil 'mZ CO Xi 'r1 0 7) O 0 \ (ii n N m O m m w an IZ WP 14 0 I LAYOUT TC-10 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrIine01>OieoovTrail\99Svice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:44:54 PM V 5 {! 1 60 EE P�GN~`N�5 ` \ \ s 1 M. ` \ o tP o \ \ \ o \\\\\\\ 70..p.\ 0 1 m N\� 1 CO m , D 2 t i .4 ° 1 sr °o. 1 ‘1. IllYfligi ? O m4 _.+)1111111\11k ■ O pr ' N it 1\ olli o \ I 1 ° it fir N 1 g� z 11 II oo Z Y : Z y I p rE+ Z w m Z A ICY �+ I ra 1$ ° 1 FA 0 $ -1. S Alt ' 1 0 m y I ° ' o o emr x 1 " z A I � _ 1 Ip1V I 1-I f' c I A v Z �Z I p m MIN. I m A x < Z D m xi co i �r c iI j i 0z c omD I Z �r ' & O ) Z Z O Ic 1\% z ' ° o I 1•1 ATC —1 HL,iNE s'1;8 q 4 — _- -i 5p, SEE CO EE BELp 0 71 v0 A W N Z F O z ry °Z mN mZ >m ... C) =i see M Z ° , ti nZ 3'N 'OZ 2M S41111111 n 73 - _m C mn �� zN o �� ?o Q .0 O , �L..... ..rte C m o co °m c m' n MATCHLINE STA 461+50,SEE SHEET TC11 N o N m CI (A mr, O ym r"n �' ii= Zm w Zotn o o —I - '1 ou U) z o m C Z Z W o r- o g m •I O m 0 z m r CO--i m i T z Z N ri Z N C 0 . ® S m x N -- -' I I I1 -- -0,31133HS o 33S`09 + 1 9I VL-S-3NIlHO1V W LAYOUT: TC-11 PATH U:\Breen\Projects\Clents\6954—NOSC\236-6954-00t Wt1neOl tOiscoviroiI\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY resmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:46:04 PM V 3A08V 33S`OS+9SV V1S 3NlH�1VW —1— j : 1 O 2 1 g a a MIN . Cl 6 d �� §' 0 o 0`3N 81 I D m gz_ j uAZ n Joiik 4 + ( 844sket 1.)x w N g VI § . ° Ss %° D �o 2 ° z Z o o A 11114\1, 10&l< 44.41 In 8 LSS%1°\% i 8 ®' i M % o I .a . W m ..1 i Si c I ' 1 o iA * 111111111 Nil g D 1 1 0 g G gri< i 9i,,2� 1rNs 13 N I y r C Z E z Ai a O Ilo < 21 rn < 2 I 11%\c' MIN co M A ; m r g p = nZ I p lIt z mn }t o Z> I$ Z ,-1 r- + O $ Z i%ll a MIN �.--` --� -- MATCHLINE STA 456+50,SEE BELOW II I ,It k,,s, ,, t S ( ° m5 m° �x .;, 2 = N O O to MATCHLINE STA 451+00,SEE SHEET TC12 G 2 z o! m 0 §m r— .� O 't►s H m%r n O � � �t—I0 CZ zW o m P _I y en z < o 0 rn mA r D n O m Z n f1 m T p * • LAYOUT: TC-12 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6984—NOSC\236-6954-001 WM(ne01)0iscovTraH\99Svoe\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:46:47 PM V —_ 0131133HS 33S`00+15171i/1S 3NflH3iVW T NIS:pi -11.-- N ill '''S,\. c..3 , I • i m I < spsy� O oo O D !�1 60 °co b ° rF z -4 4t*N% 1\%%%%° �gi.Qz N N flj 8 IF 1 i°Or 4,111SNa oN O P.m ° Z ° m JO4 4. yca %% kl 10%, 1 g , I 37 i ; k% 0 i , Io ° 0= I a c cn o N ° Z � Om a a o f12 i I 0 rh m Or -.- 0 D O ! O • m0 o• mD Z �s O z -.I 2 * c n as it c O 2 o ° o orn z � 7D W, 0 °T. —O N W° LAYOUT: T01 PAIN: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtr16e01yOiscovTrad\99Svcs\CADO\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 6:48:02 PM V m le -O -. 10 -O O �G * to N s O 0 0 I-D °m m A1-- OOOOO Z O O m rn M A N 0 E > 0 ill O. 1 —1 r 0 r n co D O t N7 _ . w °> Z O to A z co \\ °O A z> 5 0 al -?rt 0 Z to —I P 0 N -D1 .r A -n -±zj 0 O rn —I m Z Z_ u 11 0 0 0 I N Z N 2 v S s O Pi 0 0 � 0 PO 0 O Z w N 6 v xb -i F a e3 = D c 6) m r A O m Z D iii rm 8 - vc 0073 m zc F Zz o a T lnrx W A O mL 111 nm O �rr A Zn <m r N , ' CO m A 'X X I X to 0 N O 1 z 2 6) 6) 0 0 A 2 2 I Ig i F I O N (..44121 1' rL I to,i; Z r m 1 m m y =N =N i23 CZOo CZw tD g o v prio tT A m m 1"1 W kr omZ N ■ o_ Zr°+1° =i 0 _ A&AL 1 °° czi ° 1^,. E_ I� 8 =r 0 I = -< 9 "'I Z U) Z O j -'I '0 0 li 0. e' £� .a CSC co x O< ➢�7 �►D. n CO A 3r < <O 3 mr mA— -< I N �' 2 0 olw } xt7 3— } r Z 2 �` z �1 -A °2 z N Vf{ o i 0 vZD AOp D0 0_ •.--. z0 Oi A C r O -a p a r ..0U) -m AO r O O yW O A N Fl Cn m 0 rn rn i CO �m p Cn N co O INN CO N y Z O U ' Ol CO A O Z A z O O z . °< 2 N O y i C rn XI C') rn rn rn w W 9,- r- m ■ At- A+ trim 0 Z ■ Z © t 0 03 rn0 N 9 0 ,y TA w ,_ o = `� No < d 50 IN °O- x CI = AZ as p I °o Z Zr O 0 + r o ° z ° tv)K1 \--,...."1 , ir ,, CGO �a NN O< MI a 00 C�) `A rm' O 4�1 O< i M r A M IL 17 mZ I --'l OA Jt- 0. D �� r A z A ? Z =� ED r R -i� m z ''1 7C M 0 P73 o F N z to ° 44 N m 2 rn �1 w_ o * g o o b7 Z 0 ° X 5 z v �, cn ZZ m _ 7) Z y g 6 -. ,(--,to °i o Z 0 IP figilLA r`.i X7 D y O C") y m y cn T CI) z ~ Z Cn = 0 Z / , Nib 0 0 , z ______, ,_,.__.., (0-4) 70 m m m , _....„,..._ cr) °L m il �-p 0 01-1 C p:1 SNO W !...< 0 8 716.1)n / m z ri CA m m m �" n m { W o 0 co z D I--i rn D z 0 0 Co Z 7.63 0 H _ _ _ _ _ 0 s m zU1 A W N .tea O co co v /T (T A W IV — Z j Q c D m p (/) 30 m ' cn � � m O •-�•-, /1 at rti 11 lTli —4 Z o m cn m -0 m c 2_ O r�a -� �.a co z r m D c -i Z D y O Z Z =- --I :.��' l` c m CO D D m c z z O z p 0 =� fD c---.:A C �� 9° --1 , _< - T) m * Z C) D m m r S c-� orb. r~ 0M > co Dmco00xa) m (D rq_ ra KX � � cn � mzc� �y ' m -ice om � z —+ � o -� rn n X co 0 o p m O `'' r Cill) Z Z r `. D n y m OD D -1 z Z Z x Gm p O cn Z m Z rn I o o I m 1 o NORTH "YMPIC z m TITLE .� G� Camino 0 0 o y` ,'. o�$ ENTR/X co co / z V, '' s' 7f ` SEATTLE w SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT , - `� ." 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 N o v 0 � ,/� O y�%�,.O SEATTLE.WA.98119 $ m m o u - • TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON -CO LIT .. www.cardraent x.can N A W N O 0 P J P 01 A W N x <1mmcmcmpm,0m� A>x x1- HOMO zmOMX M xx 0HH�gz1 a0= OCAC= oOFX ii dOVzzgOzzmx MO yZsONim Hommr m Amm oT(mA(m'IZ1,ZON Cmm mrTm(1 m-Z{ZO_ OTDNT cm-10 mmm2z-iZ mo. AZ{-Imam mom Dm r�<m° 'gO o o1, 1,N WO MM z1- o p QhF�OVmZA.1C1'�VD��fxfl ADO y NADZ o:vo; :o0 A�Cp -1`C�Of�f1O OI�TIO 5:. . Em-,0(")O rrrl1 mom�mjAZmmm00 i�� my�m-1,i-pipo9mv "'rpzm >C0 A OHO m .Zy� D Z r 0-r (n ZO,Cmn A m>1 Z Z ZA Dm �.Z�1 �O<m Z---111 Drip A �O p>p 101,m Z1-z>1 mm o Z:rr°�Z ZZm12 z0 n '*oo z 1zC=,'� 4,.. › Fr --w1, m-_, zzz 00ZD0 = HOC) ZOZO -1Nzn �m znz<m00-4mz O0o mm>-°-1DC0 z1, O �x�00>OOOO�Z °io 00 mzDN v03m0 o�mc0 cmp<1,�r �czi0 ;°CO zm00 Do mmr°D0glmzrn 3z 1,(041--mpmF�zoz m m 1, 1,m C N m 1, m D x m , N m a -I 2 p-m r m �.-.rmC?mAmN > A3F n1, �o, xONZ .1-.l Dr �� 1, CZ 0C� m X°Z 0t- omm0°<-1 N 0)1 z z- o 0) C x -i z 1,N N m m�N -1Dz D m mm 0 q�O_ x0 t' Nm Z-i�N n1, 12ANSml Z- m x i,(-7, OONms bx1y2 Szx OCHmmm Dm DV zg1mG1 *Zmx <A Ap1Dz-i?-1A° z cpcmi u'zmOmvN zx-npmAim>-o- mot- mm m- mzT rmNOr for m3< On ,- n a v ��777qq zm�C nx r 1- 0 V-1 m O< 0 0 Tmm A(m(�r <5 3500 D 2 N o0) 1,o-40)00)m m r r 1. O D 0)m°1-00 Sz r -Ziz ni 7X'1-0 1,T z1- m 1,r C!)0)C7 m q=ip T-r O m0N �n G �N m 1,z D zmm0om nm -zmmoz0> r-im< omm- 40,0 mmm Do °-,31= a)OOZm D z mmOmAZ 1pzz vG)my0 zzm0 z0 NnmrDZZ=1z-i F 000)41, �NO?�m M gDODDm Ty 1-m S NO 1-r CZrm mo-Im z-lm 1,D-1ozD 1,'i m2m-1D F.-PT-5 Cz Ozmi-z01-mm m zmm 11 y ZOq D m m v z z o m r O T 1, 1,z 1-N 1-0{ 0 D z m wp D m 0 O m s (�o Z +D 1, ,,-0- 2 0 y 0 OM m 0 Z _i1, -i- 0 r O Z m-iO C 0 $_ p TOfmcw m m m 2 1,otm D u0) mS n� v V D g r 1,V O O< m �o trfTl1= A m y tin z o o m ��m-1 x m 'h 1,A D f�/1 S�$ z S1,m y v n z .n D°i°qo m l6 M FSmNmm-400---4 NM mm 2D ° '�00D� m1,°° na DDV O 1,60)1,rT1 iz1n ZS ZZ ZOmmOmm-HifANTiAZ O m 1,Nmc)zm i73C O i O N -1 Z -1 O 5C r Z -0 0, O mD)O Tm A O1 M TTl z A m 2?a(mno'O 0 Am g-p Z1,>1.77> (OEM T N0Ni m C mop O x 1 "C 1 Z(:)6 W �0M zt�il>3m z v < m-i, (// N D t� Z IN O -IC)< m m N N� V Oc N Z 2 m q ° N 2_-/ O1-N- C 73-iC m ° Cn° m T $ TO 1, y+ S am -{ mm-H D m ZD41z F• >x0>m H0 TOO Av Om =DOVm mZmD� Omm 130,0-1 mmm ZCC_AC) D.pZD 1,0 N°Yii �cm<._ fA °m m-mjc ONE--�11-.7�m r mNxFm1-moapizix Dm F . TF-10 VOAFRI (zn V °� C�zO rOz mm�$ sA1 C-zi D 'DmC)nXDmO m -1(�qOD VD3 1, X omm-iO-Cm>mm Atn 0n 2�i V mOC Omr fmlf fmi)� ZOm <m m V omr n z-i <3mv C')Z 0 D <m r 1,-i, S ONm DC Z 21,_4 0 omrm V x.nm 'i -i1, <D Z D V_Z m m V -1�{' p0 °-12 5mnr 0- 4-Z n<1Cq) yAfrn=m-1z W m° m !�DzO OZ T 0 o1,Tn>o.0 moc Sn m°2 ZpOD m Om< Tm NOZ a0) mm �Z'1 0-i'iD !I: N D Tm4�m m ZTT -1� N 0 T<<m m m O O n 0)2 y 1, w0-'m <D z D z m>Z -I m mm Z m m m Z D 2-1-m Z x p N T IT1 C Fi N z m n z p<a NOA mn0 Nm -1 c° -1-4Em mcw00 OZ� TOCOmmO .2O-2ii0io -iNnm 1,1,0E Crmpm100n�m0-� y OZ-iOC)11�m.ap m xErmrmzC<n S? r-0 nO w om omrOr mmm ,°m-m-4>> 1-n Afmi, 'TOn C(mp ODnz m�2?D.ZOIigZT D xzo MOZCy Zo 1 Hg>mmmgmx>C> 1,o �� mOcm 0HmoH �0° -(1-i mmZZ D=20 mgzo ma=� Ono>-Om0m- o tTC4Z-0n ° r =-iZZm AOAp Nm� pm C m (�-im-i z SOnm N-i� m zC} TO{ Yi q O v�'7 Z <D m- C5,0 z NN m z 1 Z mONa mNr r z�O1,1,320)i1, 1,of ° oz S n1,mcziv Dx O G 1-C) 1,X O r Z f-<-n 1-N W 0p0� mrrmn001 -im-1 w ZN argil CZj)D?p z z;l ZOno<AN mmnp No Om oH1m °0=1,o -im() CN< N zc0 {D- T CG) VV73 2Irn 1-n o 00DOmF0-INN C S°O m--140-1,T zom o> S MMMO zom m 1, Z Imo ZC�_i N c Zn m r V)vzcn m <N zC)O55T zrpAz03 A�m m• C• Ti 0)i mT1<m-A.Im-� mm � 0� oOp�i< OOMA 500 IZ° c�� oz00 cn=s mNmCxO'iz-i c °1,_A-i��mzc�1 z-im 000mDW�vO 1,r0 a mzm r-4znm a-Or "i1,'_)<rG)C n<o ZOO 07^1,1, NpOrm-Zim�n� Z 9°Nmzz� oz N°m z z 1,o zm�i(xT� m m 1 10 m -11-1, 1-N C m Nr H1,Z C 1, °00 A a Z n 1, 1,0D r m zON 0)-i Z"mmC 'iD m co 1,D 1-=D m -11,74 DS mro o c r m-Im➢c ooN r a app ON Dp>D mmm N -�cm x 1, q pm,NCni,>oor4„. po m mzw Fm>mY' zz� „-&., �O� mCFm �OUZ)o �m 0)0<iC11,-11,j N 1,x-1,1,1,000=Z �omnz•,c, V m "i2 WOO A�m�z 91,1, 1,z 00z Dam maim rT1 C 11, mc)01m?Nrtz1m�N p -im,m-iNZNFO cm O°C- m-° > znx, 1,z O z1, m1Zr0 mom NZm 1,N ()1,Q �Z00 �m0m O-1 ZfzdCO DDOZ A Zm°NZZZDOx 1,J.--mO,CV�r�-lm m i H .1-r^ 1, 22;00m-i ;m i -, cc_�"'�)mo Dm ` m°ZO m°ps Z�xT x nD 1, q > O Z -i -100 O' 1,m 73 -1.<0 z0)Z °m Zo O:P5pm :1, CZ n rx-i ). qo z 1, m memo 00 D T T mrn 0 m ° Dr N o1,°-1< �m°Z Z=m1, Oi 6 < - m < mo °nm �_� ° miz m on > 1,pm -i 1I. m ZO m 1,T{� y Z _f/l 1 G7 �1 n NrOr m OZ Sn ,n 1, D O z m z1, 1 < > j° Z m D mm =n N o m F o m Nm m -< m m1, z Z M I- r }mmm mmm�7mmmm m°°o°m000t)0000rm000mmDD DD O NIC)m Xrr,00, mS--i{-4300060 Nm>CEmm 0 �i P' a -W1 1,C i o m oo V o+ CTiT 0 m1n o5 0 >0H x D 01, rmm mmmx Am mmm- mmm0 mxmz 02 >ZH mom Trpr m m X T z m m pm zn 1-o m O V 01,03 oo>o 3 D°3 z yrucnn m mm NO-ir 0 C D m ZTi) 49 NV m>m g O_O> xv zO D0 Dm O° 7mcm0 Oz rt<51zz zzC)mn� NO 1,A mzm-i am) zz 00 n'-0 0)0 1O d �1,mmmm mmmm1p °°°°(p0C)C)C)C)C)oC)C)C)CC)mm>D Da >m Z --10 r 1 O�..I ...40)1,0'40 Or m� °�°m mzN� 1 o s�mm(�m0 Z�zt'�Xmm XACD,)N A Ay'i 000 C0.lO1z ZOCm zzm mrai0vvi 1,9 1v) o iG) m y OT,T. 217,T4-246 z ,izn Q)D C) z'Z-i mm�mr-m m> °°q P z° U7°N NSxz2 -J-i i>'N-iro-nx-Immz_omm(C)z>Nm(�C)-4- myD 00 G7')5y °-nC mm-ni 4r) m1S7)AO Ni1z 1,C-i1, ZCTA <1 {� N▪Zm1,ox room tzi�aGZi°z m�ryiG)2i� �pmm�zTT�mp ' z0 y33q zp 1,30 1,p-m-1Z =1,N mmmm" N1om m7p 170,0 y00NZ0 1,m m A m m_1 m A 1,n n 0 < 73 m Z o A N m V o m A N m 2 1, Z 0 C c O 1,z A(z') zoo z ° r(n17--I •-4m-4-100 11,=0 0O 1,,0 �m mzN zm3zN f.-).L3 OH'i m 1,O a DN xmx mc)mmx > 4>m >z rp O 0 1,1,0)1, ma=Z 10) { m ZA Zim <m4 > rp-1 S-zS5 zm0 pm mmD 1,0 Dm0 mT 3 m 0 -1 m . °r m 1,o < , w1, q V -n-loo, m m mm 'i r C m p*m y1, O r rCTp1y Nn�'pp� 1,4mC mrO 1,3 -i -w0) nz mmr Dr i1,OV'1 Or D 3 m.- m-Dim -in 3 1, z0 0ZZ mZDmz OND No1,Z Zmm 1,z ozW mmz,om v T OW Zp xO n - 30 -5w 1,°g°-i -,-ix,C) >Zy° omm 10) mOD mmO*m m z °n n 3 rnZ 1,$o m< Z�_im omZ�z omD °1,m zn� >02 1, n°D °1,i=�=_N C) m d m -i0) 0%c3 °V o1, T 0 Om 1,z 1,G) °C V 0 Z D-i T m .mm 1,D Of , NO cp0 x-17 sT 3,m,p ODCm)1 Sam 1,0 1,N= 0nzizn�0 D mm m m �< 1,[)m NooFc) 1,o m°-r1 Crr 1, o>m i1, T1, W 1,Z ' m m2 m x[p z m m m- °z{- 1-4 D m m<0 z m Z o v co zC7 z O jZ CDj3c -Aram-,3n smD 0NZ mOD ,<-zn =m m°>zcm 0)!7 x? 1-0C ()m mom oNC_zm r1,--1, DnS DNO �< mzm w▪,- m1z M V Z 5 mm DNi (?0>0E <1m 1-_D mmz 2 0nV Dm-41,01, < ° �- DO- F °O m in Cr- -i O Z m z a� pm 001 C-z-11Am m.ZOi D >Om 00 m 0 ,7mC((/�z n N�CZ/)-4 1,o �f�*�R<{001,1(0)!)4 D 0m0Cfa)AVpr nC)-zipz z3 tirTO 1,N O N o Nmz mmo0� 1,0z 7c pm <Di o NDm -11,mz2m go q 1,ivm ma i Gm MOO n Non 0z 0 1,a n«� 1= � <F�S0TZi AM> vom T°Oai A m<r z��Z o H mm N o m z m s .m -3 ... q N i r 0 1,1, V CZ/) mno -'^m KE -4A 10F'm omm mm0 -i0V 0 TOT mmmHON 1-m .='.t'0) <x x0 C-10m0 ZxZ mm x00 non z>AT-Zim 00 ---> m m 1,r m x D m m ><0 g<° m a p° 1,m 1,-1 < mm*gg 5�5S<j-1..moNNNNmm mmCmO0VQozzzzm_$011rx D' NO 1,'p .o 000)02 r<R-i OC xZZ Zm)' '9�_!'if) DZ Om' cm➢i1_➢DriRVppDOazmoc ODG)G)�jm00O0$OOZOiA1mC/ z z1, z1, lm O3 m mmm Z ypr ocZ m< n az pmDO m -IC�DmSrg2dm21. 1 T0S-A MA-zim-i=z=IOTIC �N ° -D -n 1m 1,m .iz -zin HZ/ii �()m zmo m 0 r ryOCNizu)• O C azogr IT�mz1, m Om mO�-miO-Z.iO n 1-3 1,z 1-r�O co OO n0 xAmmO moZm xDY'i, mNN Z < m - mm Cam-1 AG)Ar GJ� { m 00 ?f� C01,00 z 1,D D ZV 1,C Nn73DA �G10 or-m Tom N Ox Mi4 1� m� 1,A -1,,,,,m_< m 1-0 mm m T x 1-0° -1p� Z p N DN 21, 1- -ro D m -I1- x m D HyO 0 Dim 1, m m 0)ym m 32D T < TTTT�C z1- D m- rK ZT m m 1,1 rpON 0 m{ i- O z N�nV T 1 p < �Z3 mV1, O m o 1, r0) C r mDO mTD mx� m ND-q D Z m 1,0 V CT� A m n D C 00 o 0 T 3 m 1,m 1 p O z z C m m a m D z 1-073 -I m m m q NO C CH N 1,Z m CWn CST)< 1,N 0)p m MD-,1 Z W m Om-1 r DN 1,{m Znz N<Om mmm 0 cm ° S my n z o> o�v�Om <c mz0 msai c °> 0�vmm -i N T 1, C) 0 1,n m O CC OT-0 _ V D-1 1 1, 1-Z m 1-z 1, m -,,>> ° x z < C Z z'i ° Nr mrr 1-0 1,1- 1,0)`3 3 n �OOZ�m •0 > i --1 < 0 z 1, O 1 D m OC m C D m Z m Z Tmn H D m F pm x m 0 T 0 MO y1, 0 A c > 1,O m r .0 -Di<z-iCU _zj°-1 zoo mrp Dr 5� z.pyN? Z m 1, -1 1,m r 1,p m rZm 2 2 O Z 1,n N 5n m'i> D1, 0)v r m 0 N m m t-- -< EN p T m -150 mD Tmn m rim N r2C1(1 Fro O C z 'x N n vz� v 5 Oim nz o N -ppr0<N .n 0 > 0 1, 1, n ° m0 c m mmm2mm Dm m O A 0 Z m H Dm m i Wiz{g?7� 1 -4 m D m O m m 0H 0 n 1-m = o 0 z ° m Zo m -i z I i I ' ! j 1 I j . ,7 1 1 1 ! x I I 1 I 1 1 I p z { N 0 1 1, = T 1 1, I" N * 0 C << C r IT - °m m A D -i s Z -4 1 7i O m z 5 Cmi m 1 o r A m m m D n m m O p 0 r m m m ° m -o m Z m 1, m W 0- : 0 3 1, 1, 1, O z x v x a D r p m n 1, o • sr iV �°m�° n r p 0 D z 0 m m : m 0 o z z n 0 D z D m m m z r ° z z ° 1,z Z z 1, m m in i m m m o 0 A O 1, > m z z m 1, m <o o _ > a o N Z Z r o r Z< 0 Z m CO rn m° < _u m m c co m C),--3 9 Tx -I Z,OD0 c m O 0� -I Cmm -1,i C 00 �Z o �� n S Z e4 4110 m ✓ nO� v m ° m o• 0 ��mm �� m I z z S O �Y+Cm < 0 ° -1 -a z o r 0 N m ST q m m z N G) C7 C D 'n J 1-n G) 0 0 1, A ° z m m 0 m D D 0 0 m Gm ,. cm 0 0 o m N m N z1, 1- { 2 (7 20 � AK w > > 1, n o 07 .,,1 G) r m ° m m m GZi o 0 0 - (�pT�1 > o D m -urn O o 1, S ' �� R _ A T z NOTES MT .� Ca1'[�110 < < � ' o ��, ENTRIX P Z a., Q ,_ N SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT �. -``° '� SEATTLE r ti 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 " x ° O ' s�` ° . i .' SEATTLE,WA,98119 m m mm ` TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(20G)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON )� ., `� www.cardnoentrix.com w J :4919, •wry .7-•z Fl 1 1 I o mm m r`� x SI -- vmcn(nPnfn z m�C ■oxmommmmmOnp� I U ,p= _ wzxnO G o { i m- c--mmx m m Z O _ x q. - a°0 z OvZm-Ic-,ar _{ to ODA--71 mO0C -G=� ° H zz0�0-10mm o L)o-4 tnmx� rOZ m X X x x x > 0 0 111 • 0 c-rC000mSx n < 0 0000000 %0 0 0 A cnm 0 Cnmm m i-X 0 Z 01-fmfl• _ m rm9 c O m M y m 0 r -.rr- m,amzDD013 m tzai o = _ n m o OZTICnZrz O1W11cnrOC)ZW W-10 0 zy m °m _o m 0 33 r 0�DmMZ>0O1> 0 m 4 z 0 {r'T -IM –2mxm z 6 z �7 m 2=7is m��.00-1 _1 . m o 0›mz c- 0 =z<z2 Ozii Orom-06) •-m o0DD� -I1;=WZ D /\ <m 2 ` ' � o _ m �/\ I 1 r J -n / x — \ ___ \ _v a v • o -o — T N - / I W O W N N / J 7 C QQz m �� / D n°i N� 3 '. / m z // A° ffi S 8 / °- o ri z \ 'r ' z P H / 0m %g g N g' O / \/ g ,V, p r C P °g N \ z N mm T S 8 O n / �j m � c& Z mm T w g i / J< f° z0, �c'` ° p yS �° t m z i il;°: I x <Oi / 0 I m 1//:_.:, m P1 tiZ . 50 mO /� z m O ,Zl.11 z V� , / I N. Q I -zi° f/ xe .--.1 i-1,1 .- zy Zm Ill I vxi 0 I mg/ Z / mm *0 C� m / g co ^-mix w I 00* ...-i vm,G Zp —4 K • ' Z 0 x 00 zo =m. go zm ~m n 4. m$r 0 I z 0 z s 4+p0 ''= m ¢0 H. m le) p moo } o� 0p (Ar r i DK ° c ° , Em I �' �' 'A N Z° 0 w -D< SNOW CRS I tf ,,� z o !,$ �� < z E� 1 4� mm f '4 mO 0 --- -- Flow - N a . N= m 1= w rn \ F m �° >33 . N \ Z U + ,44, oo�SOO 0000c;, mm `� ` ^ + o� mo000 000000o co" OOO0000O0oOOOOO, ,� \ , �> 0000000000000 f zo om0000000uooOOO�i arm- \ y� �000.00.00.0.0„; m0 3+ oX \ "'00000 pooaOOO -4x 00 .;,. 8 zp Ow 000 000iTOOOaoa 2 mm z-, \ a000a.000OO' "00 _ \ Z° L. K CI 2 I I N \ ` �' S+00 - , XI CO a \ \ {... .- o m z 00 f \. mA o-, +0002x,. l .4 1= -0 \ I V C1 ) .y.�.� r m ' l / \ I m♦ \ �\ a oo --I> 1 � \ Fro 3 I X N `'4 \\ - ` 'oii z6) zi Q N VGROUN ATER �%Z ) O m=' my a DW SP c'"'"°ZG) �8 �z rn m zmc yn _zn Om z m ( ` ~\ ` \ �''vV CHANNEL z m c^A' gi m p 0 m 0 ti ( ` ---ELQ1/1-1 �. N�L m0 �m mO �< a m m SC) p 0A a m Om Om x I �� \ \ m Z 0 m OCT �5 • _ ` ` \ \ A AO m ° m OZ ,.-Z 0 - - 0 tip 0 > m� \\ y�`L. �,.j/ --4. •t"-') z W m m \ \ Air$ W = m F AAA N r.j_ Nil.--5.-Q N1Roq\ ` t G"' <Aak ter. mOm0 Si, \ omzm p��j� 0AD 2O \ 0 • ■ O�0C \ m<-c \ \ �mx� P ZOm c0 0 zz z \ \ \ / \ z . x Z - INDEX . Cr'7/"cIrs0 ZZ m m •Iw O `p ° m ° m ENTRIX SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT m 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 a% c F ° c, SEATRE,WA,98119 g m m 0 ° TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON www.carInoent.x.00m J a w N ,I� I 10 [0 -0mC/) Znrp 'UOOD: I k x x x x m 0 0 0 D m m z D \ 0p0cn "0DZDr-0001- �� o• m66) pmn.-ioHizOm I 0 ZcnmcXN -, �mw0DO x m ulmzx >c) mtn- mx I Z • Cfrr-- OZ1j2A�c)_OD � mpmmr72 O0, 00 0 --1 _I 00 W nOHC p o o m ai y m z .7z°' v�i 5:;1 o 050 m(7�_ CA o z NZr0°jiAD23Z°m -I m m zi 6i tzi 6i czi czi si A z f\, m r 0 0 8 c n T• u° ° ° m z > m x o c m -I m. 0Z =1m _, -.1 0 a i :,,,c = r7r "9:;11 = m v m m 0 r °fn 0 Z z p A = = n °-I''DD �j ° ADD--1 rD Z m m a "� o !271 00 S -<r-ro CO ° < _ 0 z f Co n J 0 to > r-O o c m z m -<Z C 0 D m m J 8 > m ° -1;11 D (D) ; I 0m0 � D ° r-0D -1 {r_ < r T U r=rl DXZ 0 < -----I \ , i /- i TO NOSE / �'. ENTRY GATE - / - / � / �� z m / I , 0 / ON4 / �* V ^ / �•- ,�; CI ( If:/ v-(c.‘,..f.. It 2: 1 I/! '``....,..,.. /A, /// / X to // D Z Z X / 00 ao� y A Z 1 >0„ - - 1 o 0 I Ao m2 Z 0 a'r !!d mQ0 c r- 0 'ca co :i: m \ m t5ti,�f30�s�oo tio00o.. \� 'I\000(000000 0000oy \ !� Y000000000 00000( r 000000000 00000 \ i3 OOOOV0000 00000 6 000000000 OOOO \ _ 000e000000000e 0000000000000 b �;0000000000000 o000000000000 ?�00000�000000 � )-q_4.0_0_o00000 - - - -;v.. e cm 1 A Ws g \ _ Z f 17-• 8 \ y \ \ -0-r,n, • z • \ \\ � CREEK O -im L `\ n' S 4 0] f 11 \ \ 9m Apd' y _.,v�t 06 z x r . G% oOZ ' n0 m� z � m z (-11----1---------------A9-' � . /vV zzc 1g T,z i co \i l I X zA z m o 'R vm r-11 m N O �M Sp 0. , X ),m m C ° m 7Z J o 0 0 N G_ o S Z \ cym Z °m G q A'm m z -9m -+ ( / ■ c me 0 A Dv /� . "'1 O vm z mO q�R410/ N. d m m < -z m ry ao-o /Y0 .9 o) °o �X qp ` \ 0z a Z C I \ m a rD Sn ?O \ CD z m 20 \ ` C p A \ \ \ \\/ X v m D 10 1'v ° m m z )1 R z m STAGING AND ACCESS PLAN (Jill)�, Carvings ... 0 ° ° m ° F p °° < < ENTR/X Z z ,, �, - SEATTLE SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT My\. / 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 o m °m T o O .i;' J SEATTLE,WA 98119 TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON . ` www,cardnoenfrix.com J N - zI I --I i r 1 OO> :rrnZD) x ZoFO O I I Z\ rr 02OInZrn r GW_ - Z% -1-10 D � I I M , 73M00-'0 x Z -1 m O I -n O!n; Z O C n 0 -I C n C A co n G z A N n > O N N 70 2 Z N T Z Z Z Z Z Z Z d Z V C OO 7 O D n m Z -4 z Z x z Z z C C c 0 C c 0_ c z O0 O O 7 O o c ` z m m m D z z = o m m z m o p m i = p m 6 m m � Z -I Zl .--I -I nOfnO DFi 0 = , 2A o i n EN O z - =7 Z .1 c) .(r D i r D v m T 3 m n v o ? a -<'- m _I co O n O -, Oc > F m g m p A --4 m i m v -< DD a?r-- Z O O -I X -I O T1 m K i 1 l I \ I- I / TO NOSO�� ENTRY GATE M- ,Z / n i ;'N ,"u 41 1 1 0 ,N /' o \ a e / t sl, 1 -_-_ :,--,... ,.. ..,.- , z 0 „ ,., .. / / - (:-.D , z m m ,..--1 O z co E 7/ / 9 < z (Am , . m-D+ co K _� 1 D ,D ) / 2 " z Z (I) o z r / g �cZ 0 < C) I p0- (123.z - µ �D II 1 omu ga m :, m Q° H- al A�� N N� XI rn o� �Z -I i CD -I D -G Zv 'r' I V > K O) co I\ mom. I F °z 7JmnT V o 23 73 : MI X 1 r\ir4A10:0:3 10,0-s-10-s-toll ::: \ ?C d \ \\ �C C _ t C yy \ \ \ \ '^ yy \ \ I- -� 43—3 ,\ \ SNOW r vT y v CRSSK FLOW �►- \*.% ..... 7---,...... \ ---- ,,,, GR Ot ,� ` y ,may N \ \ NOItigTFR , - y \ s��/N , , 4t y \ c , �� , ctigiV t,'� ; r— ON ` ` \Fill A r !�■ A /RMO�tiT \ 0 gy' ''p n z \\ k0 1' a 1 m O N s.(1 n H \ W 2 Q \ 3,0" \ n � \ o m \ N f. \\ 1 0 I V m ( 0 O h sz m EROSION z m TEMPORARY COOL 0 o m ( � Cardno • zm ` m , 0.) ENTRIX E. (11 ° z k` -='`�1,s. SEATTLE SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT c�6 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST.SUITE 500 `" o x o C' ' '�. �'�^'` SEATTLE,WA,98119 Wo° m m ° q'?. TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(206)2690098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON .cardnoentrix J _ / *77f7101:7 m z O 2 / m o0m2 \ �K0�z> ---II - Im -zimci • > <mOm �� _C Drn 0- �/ �2 ` FZZrn � Lixrl zmzo,COlw ycnWDK <-m1Zm � D� coO�0W 0co0cn- -12 D� Or= �. D2 -imm y < z73 N DH1miimmcnD OrOm ° M > o-t>< r0nrnlmm� c ti DW -co0X. E > ; -I Z inRj> 0> 00 -mi r73ZDm -mi mmrO -t07J X - 0 � � tnZD� ODC o yc 000Z0-1 .F = •< ,30 Cn0ZzO �91y cm C7 • m7'�J ? Dmmm ° °y m 'Omm y°2 -ID2r12rx7 D nP 02CR'CP -i a • p'A �,czi) D mmi m� � D0°i W r F� ZomrmCai I rnmZm A��° � �°� r cn -imzm- Czx � * xm 77 -0 cn2 .3- 8 cn 00cmm�Q D0Dc,, -I •C > Ar. > — c yo_.-r-i75 m "i 'tO --110 z AmDO w cnm0D 0 z GmZ � o zzip-r cn o m O � 0 Im-I cE mDSW -1 cmmOm- {O 0OzV <z Dr- -4 -I cnm xi x71>. x r H o O D K m O m r- m r 0�� -<0< CA-I W mi te` H 0 Co CO rn Z $ c Rio-ei�-n�-�i� _. 2CDy00vZ 00�°c�A ° F d fn A d 7G)m2 Z0 ZMrn0 ,,yya�a --DI33Oio-o =1ozz �\�v FT;O 20 -° 0 \ y� XI D D Z rn ..NOW CREEK FLOW _ rn O D Z ;\\\"u\ fib\ JNpW°REEK FLOW -010 1- mm rmM .._ \\\ M m D D \\\\\\ c�J00 -1 F 77 0z0 \ \\ • it m m D GR�nk,4 °j ki D o > \\\\\ cR�NOw'co "'°k 0 .Z7 D r ;U h0•:l�N,yF� Q m JNGryF< 7iXcn��c Ommm 0 CO-I rD- 5 D m FgiR,ypGNr co 7, D n�JR�O�Nr D ,, W m m OC R°'90 Z co 17 ---1 co RO'90•< rnm0-rn 0� 2cn zoDCnz� SR2p H 0 M 1 Sip, „0 1 cn o =D O 0 C m m 33 m Z 9*0 2 < Om m m m o < m2 _ m� Z O i m m v D i Z7"- � X-I ��0ZKrn MO/ 0K . Dccop>rnOZry *mZ mOr -1Dm v xlzm DD<yvmm= mz0 rnFC)0OU,rnz 7CD � a rnN!�S�mv> D n C1"11 > OMMr- co MmZ T o Z mz00rnc4cn 'c m S 000 m .-12 -10 SO i Wrcn cn -1M0 0M70 �� -I � � D -iOmA Nz > o 4` DZ -Zr2Z �C ci mc °-° o N zcArnCAm� ., Z o o ,, DN o ��Qc O �po-°1c2� •,-,0' ��o � m O 1 na nPF oz -0S0mrr-- �a� ZPF HX2 �- r_m cnccnnm> ci F� mom ma° DvZDZ nm `i-4 co0� mOZOD D -, -1 < -1 > 2z -iox <- mD IO) Zr- rm- �D00 r cn CO 0 0 0 z o W O m Q z K z Z O C O zmz W D m m D = -_ -i m r DOZ r0mo rnm c> r- fn0 f >m mr- 5W m 00 � A a0 -10<Z -10 b m -Im - m 2 `s' commOz m D x �n� x D K x W S O D V) v D z 0 0 4 D Z 0 r D 0 � mD0 k coccnO -<0D {�rn CDOOK %G. Sir ���, 0 -I mw>> . m Cl)co I �14141114� � •^•NOW°REEK FLOW C C.L' D D C7 gNOW°R FLOW z . > m z Z rtl EEK s G) c e m_m 0 O O z �>�ee� e >>�>� 0 z m m rn >>:e»`�s»>�4>>�0»>� m 0 0 >1101>»�>»»» F X2. 0 -I °0 c •-•I W M»>,`>>`,?,>,,,'' 6k�Nror't'A.e M m O C m m r CkOU r'A R.. (Sf'1 >O>�O '�HJryO ` FC O -_Z1 - Z Z S�'k��,G� FC -I rn G)-1 m 2 n 2 4 t rn � <� mD '�m F '',o 0 F9-4%4, 0 �im: �� m gJR4%4_ �a 11 >O �Oqo 2SDmm � ROgo 73 mD _lcn�jcn s +CO m Sq?o � ZZZOjp Ro 5 m t70) m 00- 000 ~ �m im Z m I I I I S m I I m I n y I D NORTM 04YMPIC 1 Z X x Z m CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING PLAN to (Jill) Camino Irn m m ° ° ° m &� ENTRIX ° 0) o m /'�` > it `* `>`; `.• SEATTLE o ° 3 SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT p�„ J 200FIRSTAVENUEWEST,SUITE500 (N m m o N SALMON • � � SEATTLE,69-01049 FAX:(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON � � www.cardnoentrix.com J O • I h ---7 <O Om mx 'I'0G zm •*�0mm / mm o1i:O�C -, m 9� wrn °Gm .� ' v< Age D0D �m g� �i� m AO �gm rVr CZ ~ I Dr /� 0 �m CO mz 'f v x ��o$ 1 nz <� 1 m2 A N s , ,.. , az.) . i kh 0O ZP *m i 5 D 9° Z -+mg r1 ym I /' 1 1 gpm rr ` rmQ NN P ' ..,,..,,,,n, '" g i I rn 0 ? # ■ m I 2 - fn ?• . g c? m N 4 pp ` / 1 I fie. m .. () .. _ r P ° i' a K'i 1 is , -4 Z v Q 2' O A N 31 P �8 w S _ m _ �� . ' C? n 2 tNN C r �� ��.:'_ � w Lj TDTB ...` m '-‘3 OND N fait N N ~. m y O N O r p a , n A Oap � i i N ,1 VI I#28.p8 m x al-12 p n D r �yb N # . G 2 '.. Sqi J j � " v N A N O m= Q w z o m i !�Q A 10 3 N v 5gi 20 SNOW CREEK F&.ow ! _ (e ° N� <=i =r- —'- '' CI W m xo Z � m ` V' , Ut A W N -'F, I- N ��`, -oo O co co cn co T-a-a nT m wQr 0 2 mmi-mKoog-N 1 x m °152 22 - z° h c z m�GD02,-)minim 1 Z 52*s ` .. 2A �s n mvmm�-I-I 1 ! z� m X� • mrm s 1 *3 m- gg �1gy� sri Oalpprp4)� ! I O� 2� Zm _ ,,,Or mrC I ...Qn zO m �O m T t7 G1co 0r_Imcn' c-I TO 0 ;N7 p ij, i Zn�gO��n X A a a x Si x �c m z x �c x n i x Jø N w N mpDrrrv'6OZ O O O Z m a s Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z N 2 V �zva'iZV� O m m m c, t> O O O 0 0 0 0 z D+ �m �g m- `�" {�■ rN OD'd O O O O m 0 •n x s m m r x� if,.., ��Z (, ,�` ms ZbmcyPpn 0 z Gi ^N5' > ^ Qi c 2 " „ Alm --3C'''' �� W "''° m:O-_ <m-I m D 'TS V7 m P Z Ei m0 D Dm Zw r0 m m a x A x m 0 m AL xDV n m; ZD v ZOOM T z F_ P 3 Q x A '' m c 3 03 O N r� ;gym c� m< § p ,<D OOZfA O C g _ Z 0 Z 2 D _ O v T� �,n2 A� Wm 10 'icm m p 4� r o m O m x0 m o ` n CO0ycn FD m m O i y v r D O Fi m I I x cu.-1m O OS�t x -.._,._ '', Nrm -4Th r-P 77 cn rr*0[$71 ,- S T 2 0 c O n . D O $ m A y t 0Z,-,-°r m a o5 '� ADDAZdm < < Ci ° x p A v �^wf;m Fit n1 vr�r <~rn +D �� 2m /144�:.,.. _ �u�"xi 0 w1 1 '0'O N-a 2 r `... W zZD�,7?c3 . r a Z m Q O:�AN'p�p 311 2 am � ` - m TI.-0, vH`IA I ` m p o0 D m m 0 \ 2 T .z �m � E, .... n �' mm fn $'im Cl, m oy r. 2C D AZ m ln-M EA` _. O 2 2 p J z o z E F 4-,'‹ /� ■ .. -.. (7 ^ /_lam ♦♦♦ m <� 1 m / O {\PL/1 m <D �� „�i M m D 000,,mi m !VJ r Z a Ono < w v m D El w M (J') CfJflQ PLAN WEST ` �° 4 l' ENTR/X -4 ° < ,, > I:',=`� )fi y SEATTLE SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT h� r ,0 S ,� r__e 3 -,4 `.` 4 /c,1, 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 ` y I' SEATTLE WA,98119 °w x r 0i, o 1774---*'r ,A,' k.`.. ., g m w - TEL(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 « www.catthoentrix.com ,, a w r., "Z m m r m3o0� I x Z -I Nt, O Rt mm =co mr-• mmA-i-I n i 0 oar. Z AI �0°m-yr-m € j 0 ' . -n<ym= I x Z n 0°001-m10 , `: z5r xi O coFC 1` i AZV'_TDC=10 I y ' \ rm�Zrmm5 $ I j oo�oA-4 &I rn0A,-imte• Z n G)r-O n M O 9 33 1 33 A K Si P K Q A(11 p Q Q X 2 p m n 1 •i % m-i!/J 4J y�m o N V V N N 41 �i N Y Q N /1 N N 9 co I - , , . Z O A tmt O O Z Zth p O o p th Zth th Zy Zt ZZ Zth th th Zh m "i Z O Cn Z 0 ,11 g m m m m 6 g g G> Gf z zi g GZ'7 g 47 . . / 1-1•0 H 0 A o> O O O O o' O N F m S Z 6 m m G) • ! c < m m v c Ago�z10z " M 1, 9 6 o ox =11' m m 5 g m o 2 m 2 ' , . �, _ o � c°Qmzw m E 3 c0i 0 v m x r> ° o o 0 ;• P5,991 m m n o y v ? A 0 m . ' < S�(jOO< m o C o m a o m ; ' v o v m 3,:. v A •m tA/,Z T..Z�1 Ti'�' O r A A r. Z O Z a • co m nn < N A m m ' rn C_ 0 0 Z m ' N r , m 0 cn 0 P T /\ I to cn 0 Z 2 O m L w : a M •<w m Ti ,\�: _ m A 1 0 m ' m•O m • CD I 7 ,. i Z® K 2 A O mx = r ' . . QO D D 6 � ; M m mx 1 . > I A z x .v j ".`" ; —1 A I I TL ; C r- I+ m Z f �o� k > O m O ;cnz -< Z r• i N Q I: : rm- x-a / 'fl/� . m G I : i � Z wN i .: .♦ o i' E _ fI . L7 _1,F,2 f m _ ..m� • : / '♦�' m e ` •.## 4.: f.; 3 y 2 2 N44 i , ♦ri ,5,,, _ L1,, �a • ••• � in 2 �� . ° � c O o Z 2x °°7 ^ ^n 3S ' • ,• A /-.40 • R \k N ♦ \ ,� (..-D o gi . 8 / / e . , , m � ,_ .. ' , .• .• „a , . •v * o N �j �N v N ,CJ .� � a�m m> w m N m N C m= ° N 0 141111111! . min m 38 .� tl vl^ z mg n 'Am� ten. O Ni ; e r _-~ ��' — . w / oo -F- m : N ,,s- Fr,Z3 � n r * IP ' pp \ g Z C �m Zm 9 n V y ± �. • s ; yyj ' 'V A + t A N N O p C1 O O : • ,Y + f fi ,0 N.N 8 a" . : V `I Jo ..., PRC:3+73.85 ' 9 � 4� m Z v ' �j S�VV w r�N m y in o r<G� OA it de W gz0 �m Cco Z /tett C...) ...../ m. v Nad 1 t m mA All M 0 a m r r 70 m CD m N v m I o NORTH OLYMPIC m Z p m Z A PLAN EAST Ca�rdno t°'F � ENTR/X SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT <'. >�Z - s�rnE s : rit / 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 g , o p o ✓ • k-'.fir SEATTLE,WA,98119 o m m " TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON L M O N w COALITION www.cardnoentr'z.com 1 Q A "g Nx 0 I% m� fmn2 mx mm mom mA n0 < €i m A m -40 AO D 02 M-� m m Ii mm OZ �> m AC '=DO O TT x fpD Z.‹ 2D m AD mg sm '2A m Z Z Z Z N A m o n1 rc o 00 o mo 0 11 Zh O Z O 2a Zm 'IT ilr � ZA A01 0°2 ,m-tn P :6 AZ ��� m0 F,5 019m A 0 M* mo Qw°y zT-14 75> C1 �a P, 2A m0 -ozo 1 0 o C m 0 X O -0 ..m ` r m 0 mmm m1 To O O I \ Ili 2 I \ ,J ■ ��y ` ,, \\Ni000i \is , . g/ I� v \ % 29 T \000/1011111111111111444.11. 111\''''' �_ 3 75 N 0 I�_ z\%me ig 401111111 a♦�r ��� �� m i _ o wzo �—,!� r \ .;"1-ii) �:: tea. , C� B�DC IL �' I"Ii .i1 rte° ��+� s-al..- w 35 R''4 c o ron 4/e14 0- '-i\ ` Z\ m• .,a4 `v N. ‘,X„\\'' , "\ \ ON \ g !dH o j O 00 rp(f, g3 13'1,' Dy ZD oz ZN z m 01� r ..-,- N --Z r •� , T Nr'OV�m �i m A�'mAAa% G7 O r m O p. 0 ' X m SyN mAap gmm��lm Q Z NQgRgmA 01 k m �oTDm� �ZNZO �� q i o6T8CZO_ ' 1 x \\ b�a' go n 1 \ ZZ Elm 0 �n m v v v m m m m m P 3 O m m mm x p �0 X x A A A x x x X x x m A x X X . DAP 0 N N 0 O O N N N N N Tn D 0mx{ 1 z z T T z z z z z z z > z z z z m 00 tal 4t 1��m "' m 0, o 0 0 � 0< m A a m m 3 4 g o c SzON p > m 0 A z A rg m 6 = i z x m o m �"} N x ,0 m mm j, -. N CP 8 0 T A x m 5= D m cn OT z �/■� 0z A?{ TJ D m g O 0 �n m m 'D O < \`Y mm n A p m O O i Z Z A . c p m / �r +'0 CC C In W N p - 5 6 to p A -, G n G O A 2N L , mo S'm o m m m a N T D C C Z Z m m Nu N M 2 co v m �h 0 m O g m Z PLAN UPLAND y �: , at'fLi/�O 0 ` 0 m �' O ENTRIX CO o 5 _ z ''4''' It - SEATTLE SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT ,, :, r % 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 u x o O ''',' w'`. SEATTLE,WA 98119 o `m m o 0 5- TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ` ,mn. COAL 3 a n+ zo 1 +OD Z Dm O O X m 9? .; ZOrOG)01- $.4 1 1 0 "" -<"21-1.- Cr" I I m IF. Z.4 >$ I 'n �X)• °maic0-40 .i I I z gVn"A r"m 2; o • mD 0O �C�vC O 13 o a O_1 0 m * 0 �)0 v zv v n m O Z -1 o 0,&, m 1 000 00 , m+ c° z m Z _1:7 -I -1 rocn0 >Z F z _ _ " z 03 <rr-m� -c.In V+ mm 2 00D r0 m �D -zi x m g =1xi m o� OHO (n= `1J sp. E. n "<DD �1r 7'�Dy m r 0-< a 6 V5 ZZ / `\ I I // I I Ipe%I /// E f / E E E E / E E f 4 f f E E / f 4 CO O f ��v / i f 4 �9( � / O Jr/ 4 ,y E E E -A •O� // ' E 4 f �� E 4 E f N. \t" / it!: ]\ / E * E * f E E 4 E * * E * / * * 4 E 4 * E E I E E E E 4 4 * / E * E * E E * / / f E f f f f E ' 1 4 4 E f E f f E 4 * E f E 4 E / 4 4 4 E * * * E z = Q E E E * * * 4 E O = n f E 4 * * 4 f f C I ' f E f * * E * + C I I O I E E 4 f 4 4 4 Of, m 9° µ m I 1 E * E E 4 4 4 E * Z CA A (,n O) m I * * E E 4 f * 4 1D�4 D r- 1E E E f 4 * 4 * * FTA D 0) W 1 4 * + E E * * * A A� O X1 0 W I 'E f E E E * * 4 * C m -< Z D? I * f 4 4 * * f ,P 4 Z 0 -\-.__-.1--= 4 4 * E * E * 4 f T { M 4 E 4 f E E m _ _ - E 4 4 E m E E f 4 E X \ E f E 4 ' E E f E 4 \ • E f f E E E E f \ 4 * * f * E 4 E F Its...:, .. E E E E E f f E f E f 4 4 * E E \f 4- f E \ 4 E E E 4 f 4 * E * * \ E 4 £ 4 E E 4 * 4 * \ 4 E 4 E E f _ f E E E -4- * f E 4 f 4 4 * * 1 E 4 4 E 4 4 E E E E 4\ \E 4 * 4 * f 4 f E E b \ E 4 4 * * 4 E • * E E \ E E * * * * * * E E ' I, A,��JI.��•� �`\f E E f f E f 4 f f ,1 Sss,4�7�,0S ,\ 4 * f * * E * * f SNOW CREEK FLOW �- ';,%**%**tb,��%+• \ �. E 4 E 4 E 4 �,.,,,,,*,,,,:,,.,,,., F, \� f Tq S*X..%;;s�,°��4o \ "�`"gTFR r�� 444 EH F \NN CD giRMo0NT n-i ngmz OA-q-=N z3 Q AoNo S \\ \s 2O \ CD'''' \ \\ m Z p m 5 z FINAL SITE STABILIZATION PLAN �a Camino 18 ° ° .�. 6 ENTRIX o z i: .?„ 3 f " SEATTLE O SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT --':,..,,,,ft,'-' L ° ` . LOO FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 tf g x ° ° o Y SEATTLE,WA 98119 i m m o -. TEL TEL(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 9-0096 `" JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON � . noen .cor, Ot c 14—T Piro 2 S m w 24= Z r m J O ° �Z1+1�° ; g8 pm 6°z'SN ND.°vm-0Ln,Z OZ poosDZ•• m pr �; r-(52' yt-Z�N z0 m zZr O�(n 0On < w ; yo O mmv;zyg f> GD,�tOnv rN -Cj fm' v2'fl a� rN -ID 11Nr m OC or wm• Da, pm 2 J D z ,Z'L T N Z m Z;D D 1 m p j 4�omn°za z -ivmimi°zy Oo O m wrmAl zmm m° moo p mzmm .-1D ' 0+(� Zmp rC°NmD ° OX ,3�N m°-'1 a D O S Z " A O m m 6Ri ° A=mv5 a , mym"p°-ID 2N �p °°-1D °2v ZDz 2 wOr ° S r m m m r 0• myom0r~„m-1, mm z,0mm � \\% � co H- vac°-, \ mm ,0rm z Z r m,0 N -,t1ImrD /\� to D Du RZir p mvOmczimr %\\ \/ Zv� NZZ p r DHNp In TZmmN; /�\/ °Om ZO °\� m c v J!G:tPJ z I !pJ m p �x OW WyZO mr�+�p�G, \ �\/\A� \\\\\�\ D Y mzzmfm v ex zm /\ \\ \\\ \ \/\/\\ mi\\ \�\\��A \\ \\ \\!✓, \\\- m \___ _; \ I �NXo// \ =X \\\/ 1 �Z> m" cl \\//\/ • o g \�\,\\ , € \�\%\ I //\\ o� s. \\�\\� 'ygmNm I \\i \\i \ \\\ ___•- \\�\\ rn \ \ I � \ \j\ \\ C \\ � \\ ..�mac/ f i� O i\\\ \\ " m r \ /\ \� \ \\ � Z XI c � x \ �\\� Z \\ \\i "F m \\<\i Mlr-1 8 7<1 \\\4\--;,--\-/--A -''' •ft, r mm > \K"../,\)---A\\-'\\\---,j \ \i� -o C \\\ ' /w N \�\%\ \ i\m \ " \ \\\ 5-4 \ m/\\ � \\ "\ . m %\0 \ Z \/ \/Z z /\ \ � i \\ \� \\cjiii \\r %\\ j/ \ \ ,\\ �\\ \ v m y a O /%\ � % �\ � i i i 0 73 $ O \%\\D Nam\ �\ �\ \�\/\\ \ A • o D D n a \� \�\\ j........______________Th 0 \o o \ � a X\ \\ \ 1 Z N N 0 %j 7 \_••-"A\ X � j \V / _ \ m c D X // \ / \ \/ \ \\\----;-\\ a>to �O \ �N�oz gz % /\ >v \ / a Do d Nm; o ///j /\//i i � oDSv ' mz„aav,, // mn0 cc ( as \ \ I O m C m i D \\ ��O),Nr r \ \\ \\/ < q o . m :O \ \\/ I O �”< O p�0D-V' 00 \ \\ � / ♦ o,mo, / / mA+Z n ; \ /� 1im0 zm \/ ��\ \/\ ' D � \\\ -1 S7'r Ap Lr �\ \\ \ \\/\ N m›1-0m; \/\ , 1 m„,m -_iim=a jxO o x °�zrm /\�\\ \// o zzrn mOOC� O �A !,,,S_,ZAI S' O Z N° \\\//\�\�\\//\\� Nz>~z2 \ „ \\/ 1 "��. ��\\ \\/ \�\\ i r'' $ a \\----\\\---„,, q$>w \\�\\\/\\\\„.\-\\\ o P D 4 ir \�0 Z >a '\\\ \/\i\\/ \\\ \/\\\\ m '42 Z 0 o /i\\ \\//\i \\ 2 o° \\4\,;,--.,:,--\\\\\\\\\\i\ \\\\ � mg \\\\i\/\/\\V\\\/\ /\ _ \\i\\i ” \\ m X mZ z \ /\ XI Mr- 0 \/\,\\ .. _� O O -,1 r \\\\ / N°m 2 vxx S AI 4t A 0 o \/\/ F36Z m y6' O m v \/ \\ it L' r V \\\\\ \� r r '.I (0,),,G:..:?, 0 Z x Z M DETAILS- ESTUARY RESTORATION t�OLYMPIC (r) Garvin — _� ENTRIX . o O m mo y C' s SNOW CREEK ESTUARY .,".. 4:r ,i SEATTLE• s RESTORATION PROJECT �✓,. • zeoFiRSravENUEWEST,,suires00 c x ° o +r...�"'i la SEATTLE,WA 98119 m` m ° ° o TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)26.40098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON COALITION!: Nronv.cardrloentrix.can �o x rn I ST,, 3 I mm � > Z O I m7 mrm , M< *mF O m ■ °_ moo 70 >o pm mVl�r� 70 m ; 0 o 2 >p°A m r0 .V m) ON O N 0 g ViRZ0 a 0 N °O Lm -gym !r1HI C, Ep -0 nT in0 0 Z 2C moo O ti N O � mD ZD 2° O m mn m Z-,N � -1< • m N O A O i N 0mO i an Z ro 1 y O o ; 0° H TZ 0 Z d Z D I N O "1`- 11 Q N """ VW 0 11111111111111111111...4 ; ; >C� mN A z > > > T ° g \t`UUL - _ z °A> VI 0O rTAi ""11` 00 F A N I .\. Cu, .,3 `11"„` 0. -1 4-4 74. 11■1111111111111111. .g. Or In ./ 1 2A �C ""1" 02 \ f v --°m�N p7 �> 1����� AmO-, m� n' NI 0 tn mA S Ill \\ L�nDO N> D O /,l °Z mz mA U 1t,`M ! _ ZDOrA -.. I �r c,0 .n_o _ °. _��-`- NrzA 0 \\ :::j_!j N r}- r �. o R m° X tVt��S -1 ��� A ���1I�1 o \l .1 4 A .-1 \ rn = O i ;P8 rCC Ti Oy 70 �` 1,0 x1 ®m m-� A = z 0 0 70 a�x i N 1..0 }m x g 70 g o o 6 330 I>T v Z T CN >Z I om m > ppZ�pO( >x0A� m A y°n�TmaD gv m$ M2 0 TO 0 r 0 1 pO ■ N 2)=.10 A ^^ --, 27 RI Y� Am AR O Z N r5, 1 >° 9 O 0O> 2t,_X1 -A x -' w P7 � ME" mzv w A ..--, . ov>C 0 A m m > p° g 0 2 N A �A C in Om D NZ N m °;AZ mjZZ° tn O rR >-1'1 N r D m b--- R m _ m DR NNWp '17 It -i c\ >m WZN Z( T =2VR SDTA -,rr1 m>/--1 D F T = OD Z m V O ib!N ' � =4 O 1 °m �-4 11 ' y m0 > T O 2727 •ITI m s o 2 C Amy= NS ogc>m ro =o ° m y Rya m = Ro im ill ////. ,{� n D ii i 3 Og R r 1111 im oLl C� o m -4 Zprm 1111 mi o T o> 1111 1111 \i� N J m r A T r > smr.JI// AC m r > > m m A n % ri RR'N Z m m O Z m % I.n i =r EZ O A m g ° c m n °�m O �p _'U OZ O 00 r Z O R m T -00Fp� ORI 0110 r NN o O; N _'„ o . ° >v Nx oo®zz T o (.8 rn Y r Do m So m r m zo oo v F 2 F F V -N m= 7 * M O mQ N -D ; O r 0 R 0 Q C'7-41 U/ F. f z Trz o rz >O a > y I �m ti A mm m N0-,N rri \\,,,,„,..\ I �' / y j `I 1\ / 7 O (v ���: Z NN°U 2?-12t' A /” \�/ �� .� 3 ooi 0, °os ROADWAY S ,..)y ,..1 ... 't 2:' 70 ?1z°z Qoz avoA+opr0,, w,r.c. > rim r'140>• Om /��, r.. V,N� =-4 r; 70 D~zN *Fi."rrN2 .. :Oa:�.:�}@ 9 t�.o?O. zD ZF A alx mOy \ ;► T7,, <AN m°Trn .J'' 1 4 s'� mA mZD >4.zz P D 1, II) � ': _ - VzIiz› °A -1tN/I�N /'.- oD --r'„l �O 2C� F f,1 500 Q _ ► mO-c am ,3-n p G1� ( g, 2 Ap•Z A om2. oKi^5 �\:.._' o m ?>zmz 0,- vmm A o °b ;> ;< f° -i z zmA i- / ...4. + p °� mN ap> �i — 0 °N N da mr� O N N (TI ��:L 'i av _ °x A;- l� '0 m `c'' 7,y O 70 N-;_� O O Zzx�� �> oz'ZI Z ° C , tn r N O o a u A �� ° h sg O r \ Z ESN Wm o9cm T °- v ;�? > % mc°,, m 0 / ►' m N oC� A o m z> \/D 90 mm 0 rte= a 3 So° NAO _ 1 xm�� ti 0 -1274 = 8 xN �rd� �� { `�G'd z\ ( \ o / T >i — — 0>OA11""O k;. °a z 7o mF� is ` '>^iAV� A a" N mn L. DDS �8p° ...;. m m " \ �.. On` DO Or d T N A '- g D �mAN O A rTl z> r�Z r>>cnr 0 -<»mo> VoNm ?. bY� .; mozA m D-I ca O DD m R Z bh1p°br>�n .0 - - O°D D r �r N OA ° p>� °,3 tQ 60 6 A 'Tm,�F M 410 TO + z < * f I 3N I Z Z '" N N T m h o m O _ .. ±Ow m DETAILS -BMPS , " Camino k � = ° ` m o, ENTRIX N SNOW CREEK ESTUARY r C' )A 1 tr, SEATTLE w K RESTORATION PROJECT . % `k.. :.-4 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 a' c x O O 4 - pja. ''''''■m p N ;, ff � SEATTLE.WA,98119 8 m m w � " - ' T E L:(206)2&90104 FAX:(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON t .4 ,mn.col,� J 0 -I m Z $ o N r y O co O D F a to '� ,� 1 N X O or 0ma --I # VZi 17 N N co o�w G yF z x m _' = O Z a 2 m D a o Dm-< O T> z wo ~O y ;Zg µ 7O N4�0 ' C z o > C1 -1 o I . 70 IT / L._ _ / in Z � _ CO r. la rn r w 0 I+ =1. I 1 1 N //J F ' ow z� 0 __ xZN rpµ ti! 'O Z Z •1!!mm> m DG') 0A Z pp I. VV N a Aa O Aw A�N p1} r -ir D N Dr m 1-; Z r HDc w f)ym - Wµ Z F ;m;!2r g Z� I O >m 002ZZ Z{ A O r- / / -, V r 0 V 0 r..-IOD X 'C\ OoG O 2 S mym O 2 � A DO_/ / y q OZ NO ;� / n m p- rm f Apf0`/ A6"NW 77*1 f* 17:i O Z 7 Z r oO I OO D 0 II y X-��N;1�1 �7ZDOO z2z i. o m j 01 o CA N O N I g m o m v m z m o n z m n \ w+ m D ? r 2/ X n N D mOy AOr(') p< ow mf O r� A aM D D Gl F QD n0/F �m Z ro m m r-eO Z . A O r_' D r ir O8�a o F— rrn w N Zf o q A 1ff-I v: r O O ..1 r } N 9 m f g mg r Z g o v TN o 2 0 c x o Vl 226 -0 0 0 9 rn , --i 1 i 11 oin ?0 /A z :`mss` ✓ �. . "� -'` Sy M +fry 1iy mom t d-dtA XtC" '`g''r.. 3 I• 77 0 a w>w r jt; { ca- Y f» ,/H}: G-I N,OxD - z iow < i-1,9 u." 53 " '-- • ".r*.rtItt,te,-,-."•`:....-- cn c42 421..E co cis 4> pp cn p Il D P "^f to ill m * ' co � 1)� ,, tad {o t.' , r ., ,} 4t { Ii rn rn x Z DETAILS-LWD HABITAT STRUCTURES �, A m t+ (IT) Vi7, Y�0 ._ - E• I" ° m m SNOW CREEK ESTUARY if.' '';,;� ENTRIX s W r ? " '��o SEATTLE I RESTORATION PROJECT �- e- ZOO FlRSTAVENUEWEST,suirESOo c o o ✓ 7 afi SEATTLE WA SBf f9•$� `a m T ° - SALMON TEL:(206)2630104 FAX:(206)269 0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ` COALITION www.cadnoennxoom J X N Z 0 C co m A > �O O O O O m C S m X I Z -, Z 0 A IP E Z W M 7) • CO f X) f O M mow N ,1 % \ // Z \j\\\ nrn NN kg 0 AI rn --';------..\\\.---"\---:----\\\\-'-:--'\,,„\<---\--\:7\›-A\\ 2-19 X ril Zoo / \1 r0 C. 0 , \\\ \\%\ , Z�T1 P. +°o0 0 o o \\�j\\/ r 0 ' \\\\ In vm o pp N r O I �Z \\\ GZJ 0 5�07 rn to m V Z p, O 1703A A0Z i4\\ Z X 0z �\\\ O A m0O O y1ZD vi „\,...-\\\\--\\.-> Z N �O \a7 _trim \pZm \ � \\� \\ \N D C T y \ \ \\ \/mrzctn A I / \ 1.47 A O m m ° \\% \\\0 I '� �Z a %ii\\\WZ -, o K I \ i \\\ \�▪ %�i \ z ' \� \\\_ % > m \ 70 I° Z //\/ \o Z 0 o \i\\ \\ i 3 o \ \\\i\�/\ T Z r 0 1 N I o T• �\\�/\//mmci m 1, W ;',$>z D \\ \\ � / 1 > 0 rm z D m -I p E \\ /\\ A)tn z A \\0 � \ \/ \q z y o r \--\\--„,-5--,--...\>,\\\---j �o z µ.4 -<-n ' \\/ \\� \\ y mg° X /\\\\�\//Z7a n ) I g13 \ /\\ \ m0 § y M O 0 \ \ m A C 0 Z \ \ \/\/ 0 N Z µ 70 A^'a rn c'_. D ////\\ / p Z N /\/ \ \ ///i\\7C o ri J\�\\%i xx p \/ \\\/\� w w mo z \ \\/%\% o ' 1 3/4.co 400 \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...1 r„ ---T, r--) '4 X m 1 \\�\\\ \,\\i\\%\�\ i F-12 m co \ \ / \ m —I NA Z I \\\ \\ \\ \/'\\/' D p N K \\//\/\\/ \\// 11 1 /\%\\% \\/\%\\/\\/ D �w�l -Doom \\\/\/\/\\\\\\/.\ /\ i -I Nmr"A 0 ( I m cmi z j.nZD N N 0700 01 ��.v2v scZiv % _m 'z_ Z \\ i\ / n \ 4�•�°0 1 z>�A -z�i D me \\\/\�\ D pwa�a.rl ?� -1 m 6 z G-N �` \ \\ - D Z m 0 m Y �' � m M j\\\/--c-/•.\/••\ \ x M 0 0 C•g �\ 21 \ / n Mom D /v;z.w. a °m \ \/. \A i > O n m co C LI' 0110 .. N S AO Z m Vrp -i O DZ Z0 2 O v, m 0 0 0 10 NORTH OLYMPIC Z p m Z DETAILS- FINAL SITE STABILIZATION (f)70 (r) Camino ENTRIX 4„, SNOW CREEK ESTUARY ; SEATTLE GI It o F RESTORATION PROJECT �. % - %°. zao FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 $ x °m 00 0 .,,..,/ �+, ,, • ' ''4 SEATTLE,WA,98119 g m ” .�= TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)26&0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON .,,. COALITION www. raenMx.axn / I C) I I I I 0 I I I0i C) C) 0 C j r 0 — --) N N N N N p < Al N N N W () W W W CO W (i < A A A A A A A - A- CA 0) J CO CD 0 N W A Cn CO O J CO O CD O > N W A CT CD (D CO W V O) CA A CO W CD # * # CO N > CO CO O N ' -+ :'.4 -+ N X CO > 0) N > CO N N W N X (C (D V -+ N X CO O W O W O O O > V CD CO D) CO CO W 0) CO O W V 0 n CO O -` -` N V J n CO N Cn A O v CD CO W A O 0' N V 'CO CD > CO CO A N CO C O -+ N N O Co . C, co 0) V A A (0° N O O Cn N O O co (O W W CD O Cn 0 co W V O W [n N N W N N N n > -• co N N -• N N N (J -3 O n > CO W CA O --• N N C.) > N N N N Al > CA CO O A CA (D O CO 0) _ O O 5)1 _ W CO(O A [n A W (D O O CO A CO V O _ V NA O W A ' O in in V J O Cn > 10 O W O O O O en O V O O CO O O in 'co J O V N CO co V W > CO CA A CO 0 CA CO CO CO st N co A O CO W CA > O CO A 5 W > CO CO CO 0) V -.. 5 U) CO Cn Cr) CA rn m A Z A rn (n A y 7" O Cn fn A Cn CA Cn cn cn W ? O -• N Cr) a' - Cn O D- O _ N O N CO N N N A J O CO co N A N O 9 Cn CO NJ o O CO V O CA A' O O P o C co O O V O N O V O Cn N > O N D. C A W > > [n > a C ° j (7) O. C N O N O A A N ^ O CO N A '� O A W A CA //-�� A - V co co co J CO V W r. 0 O A > CO CD N V Co OD N O {,J0 ? CO N - CO .J O 0 A cn N co co O OJ N A O W O CO �'') co A CO A A CD co O O. 2 co ' O c0 ? CD .J n•CO N O A W A W O O N A m O > O O O > N V W co O_ > W co tD Co O O O_ > CA CO N CO CD CO co W m Ui co co O Ili- * m ni MI m m ni ni M $. m 7 r m m m m m m m m r m r" r .^ .^ .^ — — 0 Z Cn Z > > > > > > > > Cr) Z CO w w w w w CO CO w w CO w CO a w w w w w w w w w w w a w w w w w w w C) V V J V V V V -C V V V V V m J J V V V V V V V V V m V V V J V V V V m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO -0 V -4 V V V 0) 0) O O O 0 "0 O O O O co O co O 0 Co CO O O CA CA W N > -+ N 0 O Z V � V A N co O V V CD CD 0 Z N CO N N CO CO 01 -4 0 Z O V N -• V 0 A N CO O W CD N N 0 N CO O A O CD O CO CD W V 0) CO CA (J1 iv O) (D v 'co Co Co O Co (D V O '3' —I O) D1 (D 'co Cn in in v '_' O A O A O en ti CO N > W V CO 0 W CO N W N CO W CO 0 CO CO CO Cfl CO U1 -+ O N N CO N O > O N V N W -CO W W CO 0) -CO W W CO W W W _ -co W W -co -co Co -co W W Co -co W W W W W -co W -co rn C rn m rn m 0) m Cn O O O O (D CO CO co rn m O O CO 0) (n 0 ) rn O CA (n CA 0 V V V V V J V J J V V V V V V V V V V V -Si V V V V V J J V V V V A CO CA 01 0) O 0) O 0) 0) 0) V J A A (n CA CO 0) O O J V V CT CA 0) O O CO O O CO V W (An V 0)) (0 CO W 0) CO N V CO 'm^ O CO CO CT CO 4 CO CO ((00 A W N V V /m^ CO 0, N V V CO V N tmC� W O in en Co 'co O O A in in Co Co v' O 'co V O O N O O Co j CO v' N V V N Co O O Cn w W N C,) > N N CO 0) W 0) CO —I CO A U) CD CO O O CO 0) A W CO A 0 hi N O O H m m m > > > > > > > > > > 7 > > > > ... > > > > > > 7 > > > > > > ' _a 7 W- CO W W co co co W co co co n Co co co co co co co co co co co n co co co co co co co co n V -4 V V V V co V V J V J V V - V V J V J V -.4 V V V V V V V V -4 V V J V 10 O CO CO O CO CO CO CO CO O CO CO CO 0 V -4 V V V V O O O 0) O 0 O O O 0) O 0) O O 0 CD O CO CO O O U) CO N > -+ N .— CD J J V A N CO CO V V CO N N CO N N W W O W O V N V O A N co O co co . N N O N CO CO A O CD O K O CD CO V O W CJ) CT . . . O N O O V CO W W O 'co CO) V _V O Co (O 'co 011 Cn in O A O A - O J O N CO 0) CO O W CO N W CO CO O CO CO CD CO C71 O O CO N O Cn N V W -CO W -CO W W -CO W W -CO W W -CO W W W -CO W W 4) W W W W W -CO W W Co Co -co W 0) O 0) O 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) O O O 0) O O O O O 0) O 0) O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) O O -4 V V V V -4 V V -4 J V V -4 V J V V J V V V V V V V V V V V J V J A A CO U) U) 0) O 0) 0) 0) CO O -, A A A U CA CA O CO 0) V V C CA C71 0) 0) O 0) O O CD N A Cr, 0 -+ A 0) CO (0 A CO CO Cn CD CD O W CO A n CA O O --• N A O 'V w V W CA V 0) (0 CO O O C N ^J W O (0 V C W (0 A CO Al '-J Cn A GA C) II V J O J W • ON.. N CO AO. 0)) Co CO TO A (J]1 CCDD W O _ (J O _ '. l u .43 I _- .UT I 0 - C) C) C) L ) < A W < n C) C ) W <N V 0) C co N co O > N W D # # # A 0) > N ' N -3 W ") M CO N V V O D N N 0) CO O O N co 0- J CO • n V V Co W O N A U) A A N co O co N N co N CO A J CO r -+ > CO W N r N N r CA A V J 7 co O O O j O O 00)) A w CO V O) 7 'co CO > V CO Cr, A N N --• CO O W CO V GA 0) `^ co V CO N CO St N (0 A 0) 4,.A -w. 0)) 5 ''^^ V) 0) VJ T- y) Cn Cl) C) r Z Z Z Z C) r Z C/) C!) Z C!) Cn C) r -4 C V 7" O n W N 7' O V CO A 0) CO 7' 0 A CO V 0 a ( 0 a N 0) O CT W .D 0 ° N C C a OD O p U J O W O p 0 O 03 O V CO cn 0 0 O N I p A CA N I CA N CO O A N N I -• O N 0 CO 0 > N CD O N O c W e D ° N ° • b ti D 9 0) -1 0 S r 0 o rr � ni ni ni r ni Ill rri re' ni j w -r� w a w w w .4k ...1.. w K w w w w w w'V rn co}.�� • CO CO CZ a � i JV CO CO N CO C) .V Z W• OO (D CO N O N V A C Z VOW A C7-• f-31)i O C CO (n ' Z--1 �K ' ��,' .s/ �9 °°"�Y�i O V Al W _W W -03 0) 0) 0) CO J V J J Co CO CO CO 0 CO J CO CO U W V o U J O v N Cn m co—▪ — — — a W w CO CO CO CO IV 0 V CD -4 O .7. CO (n V O V N V -CO W -CO W 0) O O O V V V V TO CV D O O I m Cn N W O w w O w O Cr) O O ti J J -4 J J J 0D CO O CO CO _ � > � A _ CO• v V W l m O CO CO CO CA CO NW A G) A m W 0w 0 i w w -CO 0) O O 0) J -4 j p CO —I • CJ7<rn 0)J 1 O O > N O O A C2 O C J O W W W W W W W 01 0) 0) Cr) m 01 0)J J J J J J J CA 0) J O) J J J CO O m O W CO V CO O V A O CO CO w o b n W 0) C N co .D _ m co co co co CO CO CO n m JJm (D (D 0) m 0 Om. ,' (n O CO O ,7, _a O O - N O (n A al O V O V W W -CO -CO W W CO 0) O O O 0) O O ✓ J V V V V V O O O O J O W V S rn U W co V O o V co O V A O 0) N -, W N Al CO CA N A � 0)-3 0 N In n r C) - - - - r C) n C) C) C) r- z C) C C C C ) C N C) N N Z N -4 N co A (11 O C)▪ O O Z 2 N m < co > N 0) CO A C CO V O D O -. N CO A (D # ' # W # Z W 0) ' > O > V (0 V O N W CO N U) W A N O W N O CO O A A ca ci. 01 O O A ) D W O J n A A O O O A J ▪ V Q. n A A` O R N co O O O A O V O 'co O N A O 01 c0 CO N 03 j O CD A O N 0) CO -a. -' r> A N N CD N) N N -• O W r 0 r N CO CT (n W W CO O CA W CO -. O O CO > O O A Co O A CO A 0 N N 0) 0 -• N 0) CO O 0 O 0 N N A O CO O) A CO > O CD Al CO 4''' O in A W A O CO A CO N 0 A 0 -• O W N w V CO ... w 0 O 0 CO O A 7 A CA .J 0 CA CO A CJ NJ A 0 St Z Z Z Z C r- (n Cl) Cn (Cl CP Cl) C n N ) r n V n cn Cn Cr) Z C/3 o Cn Cr) C I- N V G) 7' O CO CA N N CO 0) CO CO C C A V O V 0) W D- oo O O N O V O O O N O D 0-4 CO O 0 0 n N C C O) W CO W 0) W N CA A O A O N A N A A j V A O p 0 V D A O N CJ N O _ 1 co co CA A CO CO N O 0 0 W Cau CO W CO W D C = CO W N A C > W N W 2 N O O O (n > > 0) 0 W U) A N n _ Cn CD O V A 0 V CAI O J O A O N CD CD V A O W O b) (D _O W 0 -• O O W in N in N W O) (D in 'co V Co fn O m m rti O D N O O V N CA. O O CA O D co O Cn 0 N O W O (n J W O D 7 `d 2 `Z m m m m 2 Z c`' 7 r � � Z n> > > > > > > WW WN N �cc. co a CO N N N N -V m OO O O O O O O O N N m m O O O O O O O O O O O O CO V 0) -3 0 Z O NJ A A O J CO CO 0 h) 0 0)) N W NJ U) W CO (0 W CD N� 0 rn O Ch A CD .7.. Z N (0 V 0 W 0 CO A CO »' Z 0 CO J (OUn1 > (n A W W Z W N CO N A A -3 O 'co - 0 N 0)- N A W 000 N A Cn A N W COD V CA N W -CO W W W CO G) 41 ) CO W -CO W -CO W W N CO G) •) W •) W CO W CO 0) (.J W O O O w O O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) 0) 0) 0) (WVV4 A V N N m V J J J J V J V V V m J J J V V J J V J J V V m U'1 Cn CA O O 0) O 0) 0) 0) Ch CT O O V V V V J V CO O D > A V CO N A U1 (J( 0) 0) CD D 0) (D A CO 0 N CO CA N A N m W n V n V A 0 0 O 0 CO V 0) 0 W > V W A CO 0 Cr) O 'co Co Co N A J O 01 N N CO Ut CO O N CO O O V V CT J > A A O O V H 03 A) N v CO _ CO y CO Al V ..i ....... ._ m m m 7 > > > > > > > > > > 7 7 CL 0) 0) CO m m -0 w w w 0 w w w w w w �- w w w w w w w w w w w w Q- W N N N 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO O O 11 O O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0) CO -0 O 0) CO V O O O N O N N N N N N N N CO W A A O CO O CO A CO „7,,, CA CO N N A O V CD (O O CO O 0) CO N CO (n CO A O CO CD V N > (0 J O co 0 O A ,7., O 0 CO V CO > > CA > A W 0) 0 V CO -• O A 6 O CO A O N W (n > (0 O_ J O A U1 O V V V O N Cn J W N W N A O N O N CO CO CO N A 0) A (.n 03 O CA W 0) 'CO W Co) W W CO -CO W W W W W W W W -CO CO -CO W CO W -CO W -CO W O O O O 0) 0) O co O 0) O O O O 0) 0) 0) O 0) O O 0) 0) O 0) 0) O [Vit W V N V 0)• 0) OVi 0) V V V V V V J V V V J J V Cn A CO Al A V CO N A U) 0) 0) CO CO cn 01 COD A 0O 0 N > > CO Cn N CO CO 0) v A Cn V 01 V A O O 0) 0) CO V 0) 0 0) J W A O V N 'co N O V O (0 O Co N A J .-• O Co N N W N O O N CO O O N U) O O co A V Cn V A A O m CO CO N CO V CO CO A. 3 CO N Cr I0 I Q O - - - i ciL �CN m Z m z ALIGNMENT LINE & CURVE TABLES ea G� ��-a/no. N P `o o m a 1� z Q:. • . Q ENTRIX �; C SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT Tz . ,.4 y SEATTLE Y v w I`n,!� 3 q ,.�1). 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 o o t ..../i o ��� SEATTLE,WA 98119 o `m n w "4 TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX:(206)269-0098 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON �' m Z'F • rd Z-S1 h or ne tfW*1 S ,GID'rai p t {os ' L D CO ' � v * a' m roecta211155_Mayne _ N m W R RESOURCES�2011 Pj a z Pat U:\PR03ECTSWlAWATE D m r vD 5 A C) ,�Nt .C)l 1.p r ) Cv D 0o m D- ND � r ;�GIS_Modeling\CAD190_pe�cen\D Filename G9_TITLE SHEET Plot date Mar 28 2013 1 1:10:20am CAD User sander•1 ii W * v ' � S m0 D r !D Z 'TJ 1 O 21 m Z-{ D z-i k(1 D m O 1i1 ^ i O n z �" O M+m m m T 7$ g C r O Yg mm x < m O O Z m m Z o 4 -t 071 z c m r = Z A O O D p Z H c_ : C v� w mp of m m m x1 N p HK C? m 8 O z zci m 3 ,,2 . °N v T O w z �m o o D v N z w xi z M D w Z H m � o M A t !z't m Z o En Z p x Z p D m i N m Z.D m i O x;Z \P$. ,C;71'..-1;447 yF1�f,� A i. ` t ' i t , •x t �s , ° 1 9'Z O '5t w $ p ue- d i r_ N m I O ,e 0- s "Z '- 1 x. - 9 't.. ,, 0 p '' > p p,,,,,#..:1, ` r .,a i v O^` A d „ O ,d$ e t i 6 „,. d -^ X A "s Z 1 tS`, , P D t II �r`i Z � a v � tfi a ,mO D : � "s n�zz m n. r CA /21"13 0 °m< rml 1.15 ri >i) < Cn o IP �i w.i m `Y. ,'R �`' s .` 454"r'''' �as s x� � ' a Z ° gy�a sF^. 1 r an "�r�x� a 1 Z Oe,-. < � � , v P o " r � z m a � ts VZ Z D D r m O 0 m z ��z�m ��CI 'n g�O Z q_ ,, x�h 2 k R � t» noo ""Qtiz ,r . gr " a-" ^ z� `"6 ;, 1' g�dgyp 3T II ?r-o ",1;.Ct14.;,''''t-. , -,_ -j--i-r..--; -.11.-`,' 1. 001=13 4 cip 110P* PCi till CD PIM.] 00 0 z0 Z (1) 0 ,a i � ' �$ w. P it u 1 "-- ),-;‘ 7 ,4' ( ( , ,..,m _ H`, ry,� i a , -r.a ,' r°: i.." t . 0.1.4 3t� O o`-' , u,�Y i i m X m o F Q x x m N Z Z F2. X 3 N M O O m >2 A N N N ' is, +m f � 2 W W W ? W X Of A S m :4 Nf m p m N + a r za ** o Z O� o * A m o� V A o o� mm r x S r -' m 2 Q O O O CD O O O n S n D S O G U P---1 x (n o O -I 3 y- A V/O .7 -• O 0 m D N m m ° tm v v X r Z m m r Z Z Z R. ° U) z m P o m Z�ti o o m o ID illid R.H z Z Z ii 0+ z 3 n N O VA W►° r LO O D O Z O rn tal -< M 2J M CD t N J m n A 2 7 (111)= -o G z C Z m Z T o ti„ w z JI I I I 1.,,,,."Q I X tt ,U c/, Q Z m rr a R1 O _ f f I 03 o i Mc Q i 1_8 x I "c vm i ( I Pc-:cr ,41,,I ...4t -...7�D =—r z S A2 -I O p p z ; ! Vfl C t-{r D m m° c v D _-I m <O z.' 0 b x N Poih:U:`PRCJEC?S`SEA:WATH3 RESOURCES\20tf Fro,�Ctti2111552,1nyiarti_S'wreLne105 Graphlrs_GtS,"+AOtlelegCAtli.Oye.A'O riiensme:C1.0_OVERVI..Et�+IS'Plol fate:Agr C2,2G1311 J0:29am CAC U.or:swi,ter. : ....,...r.„'Av.i,'.'14 Dm .y_ ,:.: Fyam. ... ,q.. V iga m � .,:ice w n , fp �1, _ _. • vs 0 - T t m 3s n a . rn z - owl $ . CR " r- € � k x. su O ®& m 9 O 7 ' iW o L' ° gg_ 1 ;a_ r O• Z 8• O to tom ro b; 0, i mc Y w RAP a. a � � Z 7 N A W N N N W N 'O (D Oo V W V1 A 5.4 5,.., -' G)ni Z 3 w r ° �n +O 00 0 m rn ` D z g - DO Om mm 0 p m DC) �O > O ?1 Vi0 G�DOO �0 fnm D-I-I Comm NS mm<my o 0--4 Z m A w -Iz O�7 Tim z 2 z0 m0 zD0 v�-10 ;[1Omp mp TT( npx m�2 �p ?J TIOmr z°DO v �D Dp Z< 0 C m m?�l riso 0m--z�l7i mljai 21(2.65X-z-1 m.7�! r< UjT.7J A-'Ou -Dill OO-0m -- >0 Ill u w w z p0 OTmI + m O m1 z0 0zy -<-4D mr10 2f D cD z> D-o fmA-1A m0 r;m0K, 0,;mO _ o z O zz g0 p ^^Z DO m_ 0 C� �zC m-O mn O- tp-� m-i-i rz ppm-i O TcO�-40 xi m rn N z mm *N O \J O �� DZ G)m� �'m� ozGi� D,Om OZ m�� DNO mr AmZZp OOn? r O O m > o DS �< �' O C ZOO H. -1 OD Om -Iln� O D. <G)z �C-{O Z (il �- N N rn D =[n x Z Z ZO <O O*O Omz -IODO 'CO cm 350T <SZ mD r MOO -1zm3 Z L-- m a o u Or Zm r X O m< < r mmp m �7D �O mrD-m UDiC O t2irOD m°–°D OZm Z C) o m� _� Z <o c 0� <0 mrlic m,o<p m,0= mZ 2y 002 z0 ZD D OZm mG)- C fll —I �J �D mz O < Or pT -< c>0 mmtn O'n W pm Z-i m0-m C OZ v Z m �tyA j Am O� m(q0 2- �m -.< r- �� G)-1 ca-,073m OOG)G) m Z m oy OM twit < O 7C1 co r 0 Z'O r2 ZZD mz,c mK m- -i�C W m O� 0K>Orm mi OfdO xo [ m O a w n mz mo 9 O m 'z0 ,0 F- Pm-c= mmr 0120 of pm mzm gx Zm ..c!,-Ti -OR OON< 0 Z --I i.1 0, in T i oCn ZGG)) m m -a - pm <rm MT m,z mDmz mm > O �p AZ 0DA-1 z U O r. G O Z7 °w m rn -*, n 41-T °m n m m c <D -1O O-IZ mv0rtrt°11z uCi �" O cz -i0 rOr�-+m�m o=''O D X 0 N o o •6 �Z rm am 8 n 0) 0 E mz �`m mmm <0D O > rrs Z m�7m'1 mx 0>OI> m 2 _I — r-ri .-(.) mz mD 0 2 0 - 0 D 1 0> <rnxm m O �Z() OD Cy OOgwp 3;c00.‹U Z O O-1 m3 C m r Dr D�p-v > � x1 N 13a7,-•r.1m O m r > m 2 ma; r O ,QDD -'rym 0 7J_I O� Z o > O lDn m9 p00 pA�-Op '� m �O� �� mp Om�-a ao O000)) Z ? o rn ›m< azo m� � Fr-, ..,.`9 --4 SN mm mm Ail-7>i' A za tmi10A O� �n yn��rnvDi ,±,m-u> O N a J v0� C� DU/ (� O ?_1. 9� Zm CO, W ii0-Di O O Z:omD -Cid Z f poop AzOi m0 '�F 00 O m fas' Z X21- mcnDm m _{-f(/� D O =-I 00 _I mm Z O �Z mr0 -I t0 z D p� m Om OD m.z07� 2>mmrr- ;II p •,(..j .-411° -DI i0--05z �N-01'7 m m m -I 2 G) fn 'N 10".. y A (�-1 A F O O-1 D y D <<'n D C oo z D r 'DO - �1m m� N rn t I m p Ar O-iq O D =O O ,?2, zmzo �Oz • N x o = B....Pi ^�' p A z n rmn -1 No m z m m HO D m° Z m o N • d Path:C:\Users\swinter\appdata\locantemp\AcPubtish_1 Filename:C2.xflans Plot date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:34pm CAD User:swinter. 1 f 1tt \' \ \. 2 I 1 1 \ 1 I\ t $111 1 v/ 1 \ 1p co .1 co co A W N O 1 I I ,''1 ) / I I + ELEVATION I\ t q( r /' 1 I it o a f 1 ` 1 y J x.' y to J I, ///^ \I y 1 } W �1 N N CO W (iii / 1 \�� \�/ 1 `\ , _....- p _ v N (O > _ 1- ___-d _... ._ "_ W lT W O p N ? co Z 1 1 9.'•. / / I z w N n o .i p o w \\4- picom D 1 l - Z `�o{ m Z I i y 2:Ix-<.,_....) / 1/ 1 OOP 1 w w u w w w w u i Path:C:\Users\swinterlappdata\local\temp\AcPublish_1 Filename:C2.x plans Plot date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:39pm CAD User:swinter. 1 1 1 ® ,. T'2�133HS 3NnWDIVW i \; \ I • �1 41 °oi J�� !O� ��INI I ,O 1�1 II 1111 �� " // \\ I ' ) i __ \W T! .,, ,4 ,qiumut„,..,,,,,o, ■ m1D m --�-• t'. ^"I-I- '!1 umD ► �r�.f �'� 1 A uJm !1 I ct © (1 1 d I i° mC 1 ii i; i If i x r f" © !t'P1°91 z iwiB t o$s \\ f t ' Ii i 1 /r r/ /` .' ` o y 1 n 0 02 I 1 1.I i' r / , f y r rt Till- m. 1 t' 1.1 / /`� a... I ' I .l .. J i , �IYY■■Y■■■ t Ain z \ / !, I(.i .. to-Di ( ( i.:. I ��' 1 •r 7 - 1 m 0 \ O u 2t . i i { ,t rg -. A�■■1!■Yl■Y '. . m 1 o N c O 1 t■ y ° . 1.. ii, i i 1 t r r `I ■■■■■■■E . A \ r z t \4Y�� i ! ! R Ir i r J► ■ YYYYYYYY :'�q {1 / _ 1 \n 8 / / ■ Y■o■r o / tt a I ,t MI ! I ,' , 'u •641 o■YY■ ! z' m-O u 1 t .. 2 S -ti--rI-t .r' °-i F i, I \ 1■s• YYY■nY■Y' , '_'� i -� a o I f 1.! • pmt Ii y \ \ •_� ■: ■■Y■NYYY.•'q.? •. 1 __.../ D ' \ ( + � �..; m - N u° \ \ (■■ ■■o■a■■` / rn y 1 t I O m o u o 1 / ' 11 MU .i....■i.it .... q. \\ � DI ) C 1 A r/ (I ...a > s4 g 11111111NNORIIIMENNE m p P. • to N -` 11' Q�z ) 1 ' ! ■L■■■■Y■■■If■N , ::'-q'`', / a 1 • OO D A O D p m m o C r7f 1 '�► a••YY•MMMMIiNS.'.'Y :•' . I m p / Il .. < Oy Ortt g2 m2� co NA \ I � ��Ot�Wl .. 1 T; / 1 n h m o Oc -0j m D --� m 0 I !/ \ ' �► '1 i.. 1�•.q• m m I j \ I _ ea L7 2 �tX < OD Zr ZDnim ti J/ T' \ \ ) I ; D -° m0 m-Di 33 Om ,z� y r/ (1 . 1' ,..�t:•• O� 1 1 f { 0 C A m'q Z 11 m m m A X O m ( 11 \\ ,jt1 'C s N i = t 1 i/ .. C A D CZ D S r op o z I i.:*'< rzn / 1 20 zZ D� 2v mD O 00 I I s. i■- ,� Am / 1 1 ' m a m M F G) 0 o -12'41,11 r < 0 '�k°" ` ' - u•l o1 ,'• n q.". _ t o� i \\ + z� m m� �D m � a \\ \\ I.i■YY■YYVY■s t:i n:• i� �N I i i m m rn <m z m 0 ��o I t 1(•■■■Y■Y■■YG■ r m i m I / w o O -Dim A C m O 0 a - 1 i 6 ■■■■Y■■■■■■■,' N+.•y l`` - \ \ z m- Z N .{Z Z \ I -' o■■■■■■■o■r-t;0) \\ 1 RI w m i v O O ,..240a, ^ 1 j a iii�ii�i��in Eq t": .,\ > I L_ \ mm W N w 9'z m 0 -i z w m UJ \ 1 1 p■■■■■Y■■■■■'5' 0 . \\ m tt i / z 0 O 0 m m 3 z 6 z ..1 i \ _ '■■■■■■■■Y■■ii:H '• \) o z II !I 52 f (� fmmrl D r 0 Z O r 1* - ( 1\I % }I•■■Y■■Y■■■■."-" .. -p M n I! - I YY■YY■■■■1■/1 .\, t. z a 0 I 1 \ • m 0 -.I M + D-G) _ 1 C 1 t 'Y■■it■■YY■■Y /.I - 0 C) D z c ; \ \ I ' i 4 $ O O D m O m t �\ 1 1t•%■■■■■■■■ a\ "' - n f i -c-j--1 z \ I / . F R 4 T m 1 r Cl) Z D \ \ _ .d■■Y■■YY■■i:1.-: ..:. o \ c a I / i 5 3 - 2 < 2 ( •m 1 I ■YY■■■YYY■4 - c I A m 0 z I 1 /I to I \ Y?I■■■■Y■flo i,..,',.. _ I S _ z s m z uNi I \ 11 • i m In co ; \ \ I, I ' '1■YY■■YYnal .yT.• '••• / O4 o Z 2 N o1 z 1 1 II tv f g ��~nI I I _ \ ■■■■■■■■Y:..' `:, • N = r � Z Q I ` a ■nonommann■■Y■■■■l.s ..+4 I ' N o z 2 O 0 / 11 • • O N A W N -` A I f I \■■■YYYYY■t 1•.."- •. tom,•c` I� o D-- > !o AA rra1tt ■■■■■■■I - v �:<� mmmmDX mz> D-m 0--i Pll , ` c -4 0 y m z�m ! o f■Y■YYYY11 ,.• '�_ \� r r • m z m 0 i- 0 m to >0 V' mammonism ': !.q �. nOOO � mD0 �Df) O I p`\ \ .....ii. ,.1 \ / --� • u -n 2 m m m Z.,!.4 -0 r-p "-i r l J \ \\ A 1■■■YYU■ .;.. :v �\ /I I.-....3 l 0300 zOZ DmS mm2 1 \\` ` Yl■■■■YI • �,-'. ` \ \ \ • Dq IT y CO N CO n D CO m \\ `\\ \ YYY■■\ '':'.••'.,'+. .� I \ \ ` 1 • ZD m-zN -IOW O-I m O m \\9y\ . \ YYY■Y ',l.'.i .-... �r 1 . 1 1� 3 .L. rI m(D') mDr 'n12r Ar so \ 1\\ * ■.■■. ', 'v q. . .; : ! .. .. r'n „'1,- A Om SO 03 � �yp \� 1 o ,= *iZ z�v, -ztc�n °i 1 \ \\ o qN ' i 0 J �► a oz D< - �mi= �_ •A-yi \\ *\\\\ \\% .� Y :;A \ e -nm An zr 2r \ \ 1 /` \ I \ \ f- 0 Oo om Om Arrn � \� \ 1\ A� s I , 1-•` _ \\ I \ ,� ZI \\ \ \ \\ s I t i' \.\-� 1 / • 1I I rn cm A w n 1 o Dz \\�� - \ \t \t a� t: : " '7zo mr- z00 Op Z z-1 / \ ,�1 1 y 4 / 1 (:J:N\\ Om -T 00 3-ir Az m� �v r / 1, 'r. +It / ' /'D 0 n -I z m 0 to-1 0 D ° r1 1I m, S:U m0 zM I c0 z O =z -0'{z D 500 -zri c 0 _v D O> -Itnr\ Dtn rrn=1 Z ♦ I 1 m_ _ 2m r71 -10 O c I\ k--- 1 1 t`___ 1 1 \ t mo 0 D 0 X-0 0...1023 D m 00 z m Z \\ `I '. '�``� , -T I-1 --`I `t \ I , y \\\ \\ t z c wz 00D 3? D O 12 , ` '.`, , / ,a,� A - 1 . . tom\ / \ 1 -0i 02 !.Z)rn � P Z2 N z i ,/`' :. i (Q� )i\ \\ % - \��+ ,/ lI tI 0,0 (1 Dz�Xm mi• 0 'too 2 c<� 1+ Ilr L ;i i f �' \ 1 \ Z 1...... :"...123 ZOO D.. 3 § 11 '. i It w 4 rr 1 \`-_i '1 ' I \t •\ 1 m c ' i i 1 ,3��D / \gym ra 1 + CO \ �r- mm Om rm 1 z i ® i I .D.. , 1 \ mm D vp O-m-I-I r - y Il u - � .,► . + i • �� ii ' s�A0 ? I --I 0D < m> m>r- 11 1 ai',li 1 1 it rr_i• S _ q 2Dm _ 1 \ - m (T1 O,z y(n r 1 I I i , I1 zz \\ 1 tD� qfn z <j C°1 r 41 �' �I$*1 r I;i z�O. / I ri,z m ��i Z n ret i i I - i -i i7ii 1 1 ' i it -.-ice ) m -Oi;O t! I sj r 0 > W O >0 0 �X - 1 1 I ,' II t 1 1 ,'11. .I 1 i Y.. -. -' - t\� +uri O x p \\ tV \".-..:,,,r,' -� 1 � mD � m� �Z Z �> 1 i I ` 1 •■1 ri - ...4'�'�� `�'mz to m D m m m m i 1 i l d \ ! t rr 1 m r i-` / I C O r - 1 Ij ) /I m C l e l 1 1 UI 1 1 r r r 111 / 1•- i i -1 i ' s151j 1i° ,.t''1' i i \l'• I••• 'r.i'1 ,I ,—V�•�1 ''''-'1 ii \IzN\ c II/ 1�i 1 / t v m tT A W N t~O N W N O 11 • 1 f1 ;\1 / 99+ �i11 1 1 a�1 11 i \..�,. ;"`��1 t 1 t .+I Tt ■ 1 "1,171�11, ►�`�i11 111 TE y3x_G\ \ t m c/) I-rI 1 1 ', 1 1 I It�a1 6ii1i lil\\ i— 'i i 1 ``mob.,` _��. " i�yA\t\ t� % 20 I % %ya 0) Q N CIS t •1 ; ; 1 i,• ro I�'' :4, ",iii _ ▪ I' ''i\t, ••�\\ \\ \\ 1 Tl Z e - 1 e,..01,-- e``` 1' 1 w w w w co,' w w ((..I, ((�� w w ((,�1 W(�, W u ar� i i 1 1-7 -ii �� , 11 / "�`' t \ \\ \` Z m 73 v v v 01 rn Of Of Of Qi Of g W o1 t11 to "- + 1 r--2° _ I \ ; ; 11 / I 11 1 r \ \ //�� r —{ o0 0 o m m m 10 tD to tD to to m O , C 1 i 1 ! 11111; , • \`.I r \' ,\\ l J T .p ° ° {Op j Of (O(��.f11 w N (Nt��, (0{..,1, N W Oi (O(,y1I z O f•1 - I I 1 1 1 I I n 1 _ r 1,1 \ \•z N . V N O A N 01 01 A tr+ O J t°O Ol O + } 1 ' 1 '..f '� i 1 I I 1 r' `�1 \\\\ \\ O m T 01 A W N J co iV N W 0) m m .N.. j IJ 1 11 i? W 1D W ��TT11�� C 1 11 `D j. Z j 1 a m�j i i Z ` �,s.PS' r 1 o i m 2 m �+ 4 ; I IPPPPPP a) 1 ' ,s 1: 1 Z Z \ _ t�, t�, 0 0 t� m to A t(,.11 N.. N p to 1 °s."�T.1 F 1 ■ i �) .A (Q ```1'11\1 _ Co N O m O V r0 O fl, W W N Z Z Z r0 { 1 •. - 1+a ,, 1 ' / F �F "i;` —1 p m -0 'i i ti �66Si I , C7 i `-` I'ii i O x 3 3 C 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 .. Z 1 = I i1i1 t5 i ' = o� iitiil Z0 n u D D D D DD DDDDDg1 a {I! -{ I I u i 1 ' m t0(l=N \\\Vtil L o o •� -I -i --1 -i -i -i -i -1 Cu _ mm to z ' 1 11 1 ..1�1 ,,,, l ° :-. ° 00000000000 . -< i , I}, r 1. u1\n1 m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ■ } 11 ' n 1 p ' 1 II �y \` ,,,,,i11 --I z0 _i i i1', , 1 , (� i,,,�i I 1 1, I {{ t\11111 xF � v U t , i I 111 - , li 1 li 0 `1� ``; ;�llli;t a'" 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 i�11 'Ii1;' i i z 1', 'i1: o N {0 VI D D D D D D D D D D D J m M ' I e ° o O C -i -I --i -i -i -1 -I -1 -I N v hi i '_I �'1 +Iii 1 I i i E' I i i v `. 'il'. t) L n A A n n A n n m n m < MATCHLINE SHEET C2.3 ' ' , '11 ii i•� a °; ° N � .l 22222222222 j Idl ' `�`, IV ° 111. N Path:C:\Users\swinterlappdata\JocaI\temp\AcPublish_1 Filename:C2.x_plans Plot date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:42pm CAD User winter. —i0 m 5A to -1 ,,..„,—.1 i I I I t a:l;; 'In, ! 1 Vl sg 1 t 1 tea' �. "- '�"' a 1 '—'1, ,,,i I r y Oz m m m ' 111 a, In r —I— { cm m o z rn rn , n DIATCHLINE SHEET C2.2 u ' till C'm rn 0 _, O C) I i 1 1 °, i■ i } '� Tic?, Cmj O Z D rn z I i i i I� 1, 1 ; i o co O i1C T m O '1 i I ∎a Ii'e '' ;I i i ' (n N x 0 5x ,V 1 , 1 -1 1 I a 1 il, i { (� O y ^i $a m D m _,> N N N N p N N p N 1 , I ,l ; 1 i 1 , D �gg co _I D r m m — O 1O 8 V m 8 A W N O IG C' J a , t t • I I, , 1; 1 III I 1 , r _^\ m-F1 D O m N rr77 Rr1 —}'�1 , ; ' I i i,, ,I 'II'`i 11 {�: {'.(\ i II \ m o n > <r ZN m K $ ial 1 i I ' i i 1 I t I In I \ 1 ' I�41 li D r (n v m m I 1 I ■ a ; (n , I '}m g 9' Z m v Z Z i Ii ; 11 11 hii ; i t �# o m = In rn CO W W W W W W w W W W W W W W "'fif I I I , + 1 4P 1 I i I I Q7 Z %) z z p" O O J O O o o O o O O O O i 1 i i i I i I;;i I i , ; D D -I A D D (+I 4W1 $� QQS A N u N N N Co I t 1 1 I I I i„I I Y 1 I, I A. 0-1 rrn CC') r r t.3 :P. S VN! ,r5'' p ,:t4 IA IIIA .mi 54 c vn v �O1 0 0 i I , i i i % IIIi ' i -I + b g z,'lmj m CO W O A CO 0 Of Co ti twD J 41 IO V m D ; { j i Ii I i ,i i1 1 it ' 1 '\` 1 1 G 1 A 0 Z Z D D Z 11 1 4 i Iii 1 'I D r r , -.m m wp w u w w w w ;v Q W �J- UI N UI N .p A 4 4� f`7 ! i ! i I + i 0 -Di A N N P^ :4 co P"o w Iv - w A SSA :A i ' i ,i,g y I 4 r. 1 ■ I 1 1 i 1 1 N o m D o O �' i TTT� I IO1 1r F 1i 11 11 '� A Z O� 'C Z , I � � ` 1 ,1 1, i i ' Al Al N m O X m 9 ; t; N � p, N wlurnU : cn -i I i I '! ; % N e m Z 0 x o � a, v oe a00000 Pa to n t 'fy�. O i, z ■ I * I I r a It ' >GG)) 11' m O m D i 1 1 I 1x y 1 ; ', -1Z y T x Z 1 1 I I , 1 �`� p D co n O D . i + 1 i I{ " i 1 It� m r5 ler m rn 0 O o , I 1 11 ° 1 ; m � m m z I 1 I U 90 x > O m CO u 34 o a o w to m Pn Po pl R' I 1 - , r 1 i , I . 1.1 i i $rn co m m > m •o 0 O O o O O O 0 O 0 0 O i i i 1 i i ;,1 i I Q,c Z W Z > I i i tl f., g li I ; I I e A2•2 m m ; mi : `:� iii l''' I i 1 i i f o u, n O O A; I 11 I` 1 1 1.1 ; Z I 1 I I I11 1 m m M r m a I 2,: 1 i "1 1 I 11I i 1 1 t (°t�cxi O o = 1J 1 I 1 p 1 1 1 1 i RIG D z m G7 o G ' I 1 } 1 I i r i ;; I !, i 1 '1 1' I I I I i1 u'.t�Z ' ,1 I 1 o m I 1 i:7 A T$z c,> i1 ; I I 1 to y X % I I �' `.c1 v ; , 1 1 1 1 T 1 I ' / ? i; Po tr A w N :' 0 c-'z o 7 I ; II I 1 1 III, 4441 1 tl i, f" ' m O -o C 0 -17 Z m h r 1 '1 I I I I I I - 1 / ,,;ry rzn w Z A-Di N~ % a i IN; e i i i ' ; i. 1)rlp T x m O O O m z 2 2 ; i u �i i i 1 Rr<I n r + i i i i r i FAi ya rho z■ �7 �/1 O 1 O - 'O 8.71 ; , I 4 I i 1 1I !i _ ' !/ CS/, o t z O n (n �m Z v r�t�i ; i i III F.1 I , 1; 21 +1 �E' m D O T. z x ' I ; ' • i1 r �'T I 1 ' I 1' >A(512D Zm a m Z rxrl Imm- m �Vl z Z i i I 1 o I i I I - i i ' i+ O x�� w i m to /n D r 0 m-n m , I 1 \ t -1 ' ' ,I , I NiI I 1I I , 1 I I I n �( C4 o A -`N° O r D 5> (0 Zm �! + ,1 i " ': I I 1 i ; _0 % c101mtl i Ij O 1 co m �=1 V/ < Oa" I/ , 1 1 _ 3 I 1 i DDc o 0 O 'n T. > c, / 1 1 1 i i 1 ; i 1 d� �_ u -1 C O x m M + r�* �0 '-© I ; i. , I a I 1 i 1 �± , Z fD O Si7 h m m+ D DG y D I ` I ', 1 1 , I f I W 0 . 0 0 8 0 0 , I I I I I I m Z xC A xmD ;_ - 1 I1 E m I , , Qc G m D 4 0 m > r '„_ _ 1 '� 3 1 _ 1 , ■I I 1 '> al �v+ (�� p N z O cn -D-1Om p� ! - j;IQ xZ D 'T'S RI gtm Y ii ® I % �C 'D z O D A w D 4 � //m m m m O-i A ..'1 O D / 1 - �!" O O fxn F-1 A r : A m " rmT1 zz ro , -t+ ,/ I pox, / Q u + 1 n O C to 0 ' I+ %' '..1 i, ° I 1 i `'1`'``I I i1 1` E-5.- --.--- D m O W m -a I i ; / `y',, .�",:�. I 1 . _ , !�`11�\� , ro_,_ I > z m csm ; ,/! ; 1 2AO� -i < O -1 C7-f 1 `,' r,i :trt'A 1/ - t I �`�``2�y�g—�''^_n' m x D / / J ` 1;.: O -I CO -Z1 m / 1/ } i ,Y/,i 1 a t - ; ` '-�e a\•``♦ I • D m C) -i "'I,,� r , 1 `�'C'17 I ; i \ \♦ m > , , ' l ; _ 111 to 1 v ) + 1 r rl ! w ;I ;. tI.I / \ 1 I '1 m m s rI'' ' i1 "s 1 iI ; J 0 n vl 1 l , ,/ .III r 0 D 'O m ; % 1 1 i ; ;111 , y' '_1 f D , ; / ! I ,f61 I 11 j N I, ,ittt� r z rm- ' , 1 1 i . 11111 1 , 1 O(n ; I ; A ; 1 fig/1 t1 / I Pg { �/ y 1y� _/n p 1 r ! , rI ' .1., ' ± 1 ¢/,' 1►r/ \�M'" 1 1 ! 1 11 a l X00 1 , 1 ....1 i ; lr% _. N // ' l (] ' ' r Li3S! M D i ir4 }1, I I' 7/'' lr 1/ \\ � \ 1 (� Ti co / I, I 1 I , II , ""[7 / ( , m (n m , ,1 , r / %r 11 1r 1.4 �7_ a_ I I i 11 / \ :C7 = D ( I ; % ; '; / ' b l 1 / (n 0 O I r ! I Zm / 11 I ' I 1 a II1 , ∎ l O Z iZ7 l i i i 1 t 1 1;;i Ir I ii'I ,1 I 1 II ' ` , 3 ' I , I 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 i I m 1 z + I11p■I N 11_ 1 �`\\ ```' 4 O I a 1 i if // n O U E N E ,` ^P� / ' MATCH , , , , ,,,/ 1 i i lifiti I e,, tV i� i \a1 r li,\��ry. / w ; I/ -- UNESHE N Path:C:UeeralawinteAappdata\iocantemplAcPublish 1 Filename:C2x_plans Plat date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:45pm CAD User minter. L Pi R , , ., , , t . , , ,.., _ , , , , ,,, \ r_--- \ ,t + It : Ilium 1 \ \ . ,1, 1 , ,, , \ 1 1 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; a Z i . °to '' �mm I B ti-5 1 =7CV I !t� ;r \ o o o x IT >a2 I $°2 1 " I Pi \`` \ . I 1 1., CO o I Er) w w w w w w w I�t a g n \ ` , r g m z `�„ ‘,, gg m m pp m m m �m11 y m m p #@ O N (/r tw11 Nf,1 OI,,1 W V V O V 4) `' `` t _ r f r C 1 r , W IA ONG w N (A w O N N CT full '+1 0 1 ';, `s\•\ \, A t / O 2 . A if 11 1 , \ . 1 „ , el 4 li(T V O W G O 0 0 V (A O G N IISO � i- Il + i. i , ,t i?,i„,,,„,,f,,, \ ,, ,, , II; I ��,� 3-I1�m ', i i i 1 i i IOW` O; }V 1 I I - _ j 1 r \ _ _ IP z I - ' 1 + , gyp+ r if.' + i. N W V f0 co J W V .1 t m w '� i i i ; 1 i ,i-- -_-_ - I I , I 1 \ , \\ O O O O O O O O O O V O < O OC , II `' i I i 11 / ,I. i, \ i -4-1 , t I I t f i 'r 1 1; I l] f ; i ; 1 , r1 r : r 1 I\ 1 IS L f1 1 li �`I I , If I ` i 1 t 41 t i \\\r 11 III o, rlf' ; i ^ i Itt. i,1\fit t 11 = r fA\1 N , ,f/1 , ,/ , \ 4--'-'* -- l I , 1 , i i61, ' 11 t�. \ \ 1 I,2 i O I 1 1 :ii ,, 1 1, \ t I e._ y , i i I,li fir + , i ,iR\i '\i �1, III j:j !fr I ;41 /t/f r t i , / I yy y` N t Vi=m , r % i ! % l Ii t'\ ,\ � - ; Hill ' +i, I m O �' ri r (�+' i r' ,+// (- ri + r/rr� op...- - ' 6 1 Z "t t II '222{ I 1' ;I 1 ' 11 O N ' ■ ® / ; ' •”! - 00-*.. '' A ■ w N J -T-I �. t 1 tf t + i I _ __ * D m $ •� fA -i I,1 , I �� , /'T{ i I �O ' / /,'i �• - �_,..2....-r Ili B A m rA N ^+ Ii '1 I 6,,t i rr if f, i. r .. r ,h + F Ir w A A ` ■ i % ; ' � I. /I/ !' O TI(Dy �f 1�I r:i r `m i F R/ I I I r f C/� ((IIN11 rrmll/I O 't i i m, * i ; , ,'DD _ rr-- 1r-- 1 I 1, i b ir + i r�g C m trl i It 1 -, �(o 11 • • b I ' i ir,' 1 r 4 /�r� I �, t ! r 1' m a / l r , r l f 'O CO $ 1 f r Ii t 10_16 i� 2 v T /i i i t i + it �O D O 1 j 1+, i t ,�ll Q�HH p i t 7 r iyJ+1fl i' ,�� i r 1 :—:5 2 I I ! I l '( '11 I 7 1 + 1 11 / Zbr ntff _ co m * .i ; ♦ , i t, .\ ,, li 't /r i i i-% r , �?j'9I�• ��� i i i 1 v vV ii O ' / 0�1 i �/ - �m (pC��1 pWp I I i , +, i ��r! r + a i d L` S•±Or ttt Z m T i t `\i 't 19, ,11 ` // l it '�' r -nrn G •a 2 �� _ 2 2 _ i '` 'i I, ',1 1, 1'i ��" f i' /�f i 1 ,� C w m J i i ; i t u / i /r�p / z0 i Ir i i i , i,1 Ol r 1 i f 'i t r' b nt 1,1 +g g•• (�'�j m O f ` ; t , ,t 1 i1 ,t, s N ;i , ;r' N f/7 D ' A` I 1 1 ' I+ i�r 'it r/ r -i O $= 111 , t ,1 ,' s $ r� , . r/1 rAn rn M C A -I �O tt i t i % i i 11'1,` >= I t ,11 , 0 ,/1� 1 m A �Aj O O a 0 11 11 \1 j, 1 , , ' l ` I 1 11 I 3`11 1 1 r Z ` ; 1 "∎ \ I- . i- 21 , 1 , ,�tt i % ,1 ,/;.,/r ; g ( gi fj {' ft ' _ ' 'Ill i 1i D Q Avv ' ml f + ! 1 11 1 a 1 , 1 l A T C� I I b 1 -1 1. IT I 11 I i?1f +I!r mm Cm z i i M 1 IL r1�1 i 1 1, 1 a 1� /j�+. . i / ai+ s ' I rrO O 1 I i WI' it 141 i' q�A 'rt 1 , i i 'it r, ft , 0 2 1 OA i , 1 1 yt .4;t J /g / / / Z fm v i 1 i 1 Jtr{ `'� i 1 i t r I 1 i 1 I + nml 11l it 111 / (�l r M A - 1 1 ■ 1 1- l r 111 ;I b ,i 1 'r If i z i 1 1 i i f1 t i, h,, 1 e,,/ II,70 A I i , I :ii [7 t'�,� i i of oT r 3' r t t 1 i t� /fl Q �/ ! r?I+s r I� If/ - D 1 I r 1 1 / r +; CO < i I i , rirr l "• I i 4 ..i l 22 /� -\ - 1 t i fN, + +!' r i i 2> f 1 D i r i A i�!� �� i ,, 1 f. r� O � i �i 1-i 1 r , h f ;i�L. I 1, r e m l 1 li = i i i l'� i'i i (�ippr r i \ ...r I /1''� i 1 1 llk'tfn/'I , e 1' r r b \ /IJ N {.IJ 1 �� i I I f',?i.' i ii i i - i m \"" .`_!/ ` a1^ 1 i 1 nf�if +' I , 1 I O+o '4,:':-- �� A m 1 1 I ‘:;,;,";;C:4"A t , , I A i i I J ,,, , i i l , v� E • m (/l t� Z i t 4 r i- I h I�T4i k i ii; + i I l i0 �w 1 4i 1 i I -S �'i i J i fr 11 i ,i' _, �".._ D Z O I i 1 r 1 'It 1 1 f i i 'r i', t '` `\ S - i I i I 1�ttr1y i 1? i ii i/ r 1 1 , y� t t Z - A Om O M 1 r I i i l �fY0 �'�i li i+ ill i ��/1 �A1 �q I I 1 r I f co, f F I is i i m x Cj CD i i 1 , r i 4Q ! t' i Ili 1 r /f 1 /.-.,- / 7.1 + 1 1 r 1 r i,,,,,1:14p„l ,- 1 1 / .� In NN , A v 1 1 + r'- 1 i ( r i r / M (n V) \ 1 ' I i i;• f t'r i i i // f i / // 73 = D m Q - \\ �j q i I i ; 1$0,14: - r'. i i I i 1 I,, /1 if ! �r \, g 1 1 1 1 1:,' ft ' 1 , i , r /i J I O X Z 2 < �pD i i i i tifel'�l i i i �I �I, J 4 nm l\\ .V, 1 i I 1 6-V. jv I 1I rk' 1, / ' f1 J I \ r �, g i i i rt AnN 1+ t i , , , i I N. y : > r 1 t',fr I 1 f� t , l O Z 1 F g Z i i , i y.,..-N 1 I , i,i f i I �\ Cm y O 1 i ( Ai?t Ih x' ' t itii ,� r ; �! 0 ^� ' to G =1 (�` i 1 a k �� (t 1 1 r r i 1 N. `�' . 111 Q m m i � i `y1f fiQ �- 1 i i i t i „� Z 5�.�1. fp O y , , �'�k/j I a , r , !i ,� l i C ,ti -. m y - I ' , , I s nl� r t� r �,' , , r ����� C .'�,- 'rae> i+ I r i1 �4t 4`i1µ , f, rt,i i i ///^-..... .�1\ \ YY p z i�� I 1 �f�t�;itl! ( ii 1 r i I i / c/ v 2 —1 [g+.aF i t� i�` 1 I -a Z Z Z 66et O _,— ; I ♦FGf i �. ii� i i i I- I I / N 1 ill"..�'. m�m I' + -1 t' f1 9u oh� > 1 i f' i i i1 J / �"/'_ � �I{�. �1 A i i , 1�d r"0 1. I it i s 1 i t I /1 O O xi o A Tl D D i i /r t�fy i ii I i 1 �� lmr� Z x m D i' i i 'i ,`Aitt�� 1 i i i I v T- n z iI 1 1 i/ to 1 r i i ti i i , i i i t It� ik ix ii iI i i { i , I I ,k,t� 1,f I -.r i i i- ;i Jq�i M m / i 'i' i�iArrtil ' 11 i 4 N / i i �..1. ,Ant. ” ili i • i i ii N to ( i 11 ««t ,�t� t ,' 1 ? 1 +' i; MATCHUNE SHEET C2.5 I _ r _ N q + g N Path:C:lUaersiswinterlelppdataVocaRtemplAcpublish_1 Filename:C2.xflans Plot date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:48pm CAD User.swinter. \ R t i + * ,•, pi�iyiyR!• it i t °y `y i + ,tata t'tir1t.` • w i t , i / / �r. ill R , , , ,:„, �,,. �, , ; + / DNS f�/1 P 41 N °' O m tL V 0, N W ', '+ II ‘1,40.,41,w ••j 1- "��I O t !II iiii � %, , ,, 1 , I % 1 s i , t*.'4 rya,s� 1 y i 1 i , !j r '+ � ta+”, Y 1, 1 i , i t 1 \ �a' Z IgA II* �, ';'Ii,a to I , 'O `� 'rm>� W W W 1�� ,TO,I5! It, ° 1 , t �'i co W W W W W W W („1 W W I 1 t t y ..i g2 V V V V V V V V V V .I V V 111 R4 0 !i. 1 t y 1 V, W�I pppp N pp .p pp Op.i V d0 W � p Oo Or W � � W 00 O 6 / •rte \`, , � t*+H Hya 1 d' i i I t , f o m a m W N o G7 , �i a1a.a�: Q u ‘1,,,, t t , 1 i $ / �+ m V n g oo N o v v D ,© g�ii 0», I;t y , , , �} �I ,--/ 0 ,, tr i} t I , r, _ I 1 Z— j , , altxrl ' i i s i , t/ ( i4� \■ i ` I W W W W W W W W W W W W W g C) ' R',11'4t A.5 ' i ', 1� , ' I `� I m f0 m m m m m m m m m m m z y i, w a� r '-+ . , 1 , t 4 CA co a w * a rn V CA N +. Ca N m Z , 1 !l,M,,', s r i ! i i 1 \ / W Oa J N Oo O A 1V i ail 1+4, , 11 ` , i , , i` 1 v,,-...\ / N pWp m .I. V m IJ Val �tpp t �i� 1 ' 1 , ■ I / 1 O N .► V U O N O (JI Ca T it '� i' 1 t{a\tU � t i �7 I / / 11 1, a lb a,r trl l •4 1 I i 1 1 _ _ Z , , l q i!� �, i , i ! \ 1 j j bI W N ' N N N N V N co —) m�vm i i l�'fi.. i-. ! i 1 1 1.1 a I ti ) o ;o. o • :I 'V :I • to o fn �% =2 a: t t R H t i '' i , '1 '. ; / 1 1 O '0 0 t i ! Vy� I :1. , , . ,, ( \ / \ ;<E� , I VIP , „ , . '; + I / a r f�'q ', i • 4.inill l i-' 1 1 ��' . j t / ' -,D ,1 , 4 w,,,,,,,„4„, 1 ..1,, ' ' 1 1 ' , V W W N -• 01 NI CO •W V CO O1 m \�1 1 D ',V 7i9 ' 1 ■1 I 1 • , N \ m .- O in O G o O (N J m in O b ; II _1I L-R 7 ' '1 ■11 i 1 1 \`(38". d , ot4 v 1 =, , s , , s s •' s _-' \ V �2 ma,um t,'.4,a. '11 1 , ■s , 1 ‘ \, '.< m 4, ,,,, to 1 ! i} I 11 i I i 1 , i s s s A �v �j ,.f ■ i 1 I , f h, 3 +� '', {`, \ tf 115. �, I , , , `'t •,. •1V::i t i c;A ��.��'— i , i t1 m e � I ■ M � \' `� y� Qt�, 1 1 i i i � i � \ �D '\ o tnra t ' l i; ,t ' \\\ ■ m O•\ \ \� ` + To ip! $; ■, , , i , R it 4j1 i ( , , y , \ p F m ', 'aa - ,`'yak ,,,,„i,1)1, 1.1 .a i 1 , , i t t k i . .. t NI °� el \t ,`, Rik Aai+ rii .',r°r°( + I 4 , , (t+ii Ha ,y r� i i i , p oz ` . a t. If I I r r• mO . W N �' �� t o+i' t t i r , © 2 m ``�i'aaQ , 1 +i I ry flU ! o ^ _ ; 0. z m -m Z M m � 0...` th. ,r 1 ,` 'm E f -I m O p z a L ; t` t r i .IS O m 1� ° y m l ' og Z x m m < ma, i mz m Z 2 p I ,' \`{`` N co o °- z m 8 0 g 3 0 , p O a it iia f�.f >,' g % t .:i7* ai+�'i Z �a f 7,4•17f"= 3 te `ri4t�?f{t .,,�\ �/ + M O = a iF.Q l + N A p -; +r 'it a,'*!f• i f oo �, �, ; tiro t{., +1` z ,� i101 , ;,;;, 1t l ,,,:,,,,o mFA t —I I tilt y ,1 ,,Iii , I , i•.s , f a e /� Ed I klel i '''P,,F't 1 1 1,;4100'i ' / f1 0 - -1- 1 'a al' _I ,111j, t ''44.4.,rot ® _ i ,/ A Oi{ u ,,,,.,tray ' ' `'`�\„, i i- s\tilik,D S . - - 14tisii ! : ,i1 1 _�i /t—•- -1 Q ,' •' ,,+„ °lly%k,, i 1 a t : ', r ,•'- `I'' 1' l4 tyi 4 N. 1+1,,"■,,` ; /i ' 4 , a � - i N . ` , i 1 a t l . � 1 1 ; , I i/I ,}�f t t i ' v, I I', t iN .s 't,',\ \ ' `,1 ' \``\,N A ?' N 0 1, , , 1 AY:04A s t``,` 1` , t i ` -'-'14 ) 1 (iii t 1-el= ji '" --1 r ' i' t , iI t� ,- 'D 13T1 v _ ,GI O ppi O //Z�'�� i!__ 'A'��� t p'Ti fA YJ ' - ^... _i"f l to . fll , �'t Y'i it • '',+li '', . �j co,Y 14{ mil/ 9 , It: , III i , ' (j o Dz 0 2 Z N O 0 ' \" `,\P 7,1." ,i ';, I 'l'i t '� �' ' 9 g O c Z --, O = i ~ i , 1`,. : O\ , i 1 i, ( , 1 '', SAS,o 2 D 0 G y { O p O m to i`� _°ww—/ ( i, , r 1,f,i `, , i 1 7b li z:..1 c_ g __, ,�—.t 0 �.m 0 .'f7 ) //� `, ,_ i r � • 1 \\ ° , I ',. '' , ', 5-=t' "Ti m m t 1 ' , \r, \ , 1't {A' ' ` rsi2ag M D m }�[ i I 1■ i1 " ' ',ri p I '- t � ; O z to 0= W 1 i i i i i ',' Z X ' rt'I Z i" n=1 O) liar i. i r'/ f' +f i �' I i■1 'li 1 ti■ I a C _ .'( ^l\ '\ ', a . ,'1' t N 11\ s ,',,'1 mt `\1 D Q XI Z D a$ p TO +n , \i t 's, t t`s`% \ \ +t ■(1 c\'�'�'1,, m\ D m _ <a • a a ,1 \ __ —_I Z y \ 1 �^ Gj a.Fy �� (.,j , t t\+, ,I s it 1\+ Z O m �a a y \ t , 1 gg t Z O CO -a nt=n m� 'I \t / s M'y`+s i i i ; • m D O n'•I ,.� u/ I I 1t ‘\''' t 1 Z A \ I ■ ,, 1 'III" i V N •� \I 1\ t + ''''`\ Ill' r `` ' add y , + !1, I i1 i�l I�Ta 111 n �F 1 , 1 \ i, ' i s i s i i i i�ii '1 n N ,j i� Ii t Iir+Y , I , IAIt ■ qqq \\ I / ` i j I 1"\t t 1 1 1 1't '''\ `\I !o , tl a 1 1,,C\;i■ ,s''II III ,) , . Path:C:\Userstawintei appdataUocaRtemp\A:Publish 1 Filename:C2.xjlans Plot date:Apr 10,2013-07:07:51pm CAD User swinter. f. - • f • t t. t. 1 1 I I _ : r' 122 "s\ t\ \ \ > 1 '�\ ! LIN-0 �'" • • 9 pri�' - ,, `yam tt 1 • '` 1 1‘ N >° z \Ct gg �A . \ NJ kiiii A . A oOzy- \ I t. 1 \ f --..,.0'''''' tiiik C -13 ;`4�` t i .' ` - \ t ..7 \ / 1. .,/; 0 CO 7." 1 \ 0 . rirr rrr \ _ rrrrrrrarrrr rr t \ �_ �� , , 1 I � 1 ``I ' \ t\ `\ `. • 1 1.1. 1 \ \ I�l I \I 1t \\ •\ •♦`♦ •`\ 1O� i- Ili l I t t \ \ ♦ `t .ii I ' \1 v rn 1 ri3; d y ..11- OA brt�cPn ZZgm c t 1 \\J v 1It c t oo m t 1 1 - 1 I �AD5i 1\ ztA O , 1 I I 2-� _. Z I AN yt 3O mm gzm 'COI°r8 `\ I 1 t . N > r m 1 Z 11 �r J V'1 J -n 0 // n°�•\ \`\D i tl \t \I 'n 8 -m-1 m m O G)i> t �'2� t - b i i ' ; s 1 / CL rn < I D\ Sri ... ^ j y t \` \\ \\ \\ �� 2 � Cl ti \ .+'"1` \I ~ i \\\ \\ \\ // . o `{��� = C QF1 Al p1 i - \\ \ \\ \\ ZZ m d� j I `�\ �' t\ \ \ it m. i ''Ji \\ \ - I 1 yr D m j I / .—♦ \ r I i\ m > o !' ,`,/ "�"°�,,I 1_ .*,,� ,\ `I ttt of. 1 \------ ‘ I \ r O /�l /{}' . ,,!/' � \ )1\1 I\\ \I t 0 A > i 0 m O I t\3 , ;:: :2::1- `'... Itj ll t r `1 -\ 11 d::: ; ,:;./,i,/ 1 gt t 1 -1 \\ q� / 7,,,/,./ 1 11 \ O O m \ t i : it + 1 t t 2 -n gFy 6Z'1 ✓ `\ gib 47 \" 1 0� �\\ tt\ \t\ ■ \ i- ,y t • '.7741) ,A::4:`6V y 1 x -{ Z^ ♦ �� ,� ••73 z z = Q Z z J �, o IUI m - m v o 8 oz CO i_7_ XI 2 0 x v rn ( -°i rzn .'iii ADx c ti Z o-1 m�' g g=� om -v CT -1 Z z �°z �_ • Z x, Z G " F V y1 Zp>S D m rn a A m to m> D rD i o °z $ gz rx "' cow° kQ to o -r -< 8 o m o ° ZO Z g 1 73 WP x m > _4' 1 II g D m o 1 mm O � E m mn m n M 1 m �N 1 Z p + m m z > `i A en`m g �, ° 7 Ile 01 1 1 . 2 . .. - ._. � Q�m m c N to D d 6 x N Path:CAUsereAswintenappdatallocantemp‘AcPubliskfi Filename:Clxsections Plot date:Mar 28,2013-12:58:39pm CAD User:reinter. 1 L til , ELEVATION - - ili ill . _ .. .....,_ --h----- . i zTg Z., my - '[!• -: • ! ill * . : ,. 1 „. . .„ : ' ' ELEVATION . .,., .. . ; r .;-;-i • - I - . . . 1 PI I !:-...112 -4:\H,.-.1••••E7-4.--.1--i 0 CP I,,„,„,i,, „„ _ g 1-p , :, --I . — 1;;;;;;;;;I: , ;;;;;:, ,,.,...i...... , .... . .i. _ - ,,,,—,, ,., •, :'1--• _ 1. .1 ;, . : , ;. 1!1.1IIIIIIH !OWL' :,iti::.;:":,..,,,,,,... ';'. ';:' !`[':',:-4i i ;-:::::;:::: ,-1).4:; ,•':. '11 : i:i 1 \ i:i>0.. ELEVATION t=:'`... '41'11111: t.4"-17 IT:17'i ;: I 1 i!:rn ° ',;,' !'li!; iL '1*' , :!i Xli:ii:01,L-CIX ' ..... PO 1.4 --0-1--r.211171-,,:ATI:m-0,- 0 CO H'' .i_in+.1. '1 I ':II i Ai ,. 1.. .1.-.1....,1!!!.!!!!! ..1::.. ....,-4-.j..-1,- ,,-.,.-!Thi•-.• ,;-:.-1--tu, . , , ,. • , . , - I 1.1.:11... 1 441. 0;1 -.4 ti;';:: ;;;Hili:iiii.!!!!::i ., ....,,,!„. !!;!1.;.!'!i! .!!'"j0 . °I 0 '.! Zii01' i!.'..io3Z. ir,....! 4;''''.:t! ,. _,!..- -;--.-----; ,!_;,.....•.!.;_,..4.!..,4.; .-H. -; . I;:Ili: 0 ;:;•1 ;!' ;; ,;:::::1 41 '11:1t;;;T::.' ;;i;; ;:8 :• i'': •'' :-.44-4-tt z-4- i-it i'zi-t-H- ,,:..,,::*:, ,,,,1 23'. -;.'j.';i Pt;'•')I:: ,' '''•!!!'" illilT`4;!;111.:1"!:H1 ill!!! HW !!!W!!!!!:11.!! I IiiH;Lti*11 1:;111:: ,,:,, H ,,,,,,„,„,,r,,,,,, .11,ieu,4 ;,.; ;:: 1„1„;;;;1,,,, 8 „ : .„-ri--7-, ,,,,,,„,„.,,I, 1,,,,,„ ,,,,I.1.1.1 fil . .. ,,,R4;',...1 - '-• H:;; i 1'',i:! _;:„., , . :..a. . .t. ; 1 •;.. ! !!::,, ,;;;:,, •••i-i 1••!;-Itir;411-i-Ifilfi4-1'""" il;!!;' '•'"I'•'Ill;li kiiiii coo ;;•;;; ;;;•,;;L;;: ''''! I 6*' , ,----rTt-trTTi,T iii; i •sii; ,Ii!w, '; -'- ''',• ; , i., gs 2 e4.1* lig, .... „ .,, , ,, ... .. ....„. : .,.. .:„... . . _ . .„.,.,. . ... . • , ,. .„.... n94'. — ;di-1i 1 ,IIH'iiii_..14... .44- ,,, , 0.--,----r,--,-*-:-;-n-, !4.-1-,-c17 -11.11 p!!!!:iitIll!.11,111.!• g !:—,--i---, A : 11111 iLli 11 '.1: 11 Co 73 ..!.[.. r 4.,..4..!.,..!......-,- M 1..!11H, THH illik HD ill Q,2, : !!I;'. .!!;!, !:;1.,; ii2i HHIrl '' "`•0 --!---....!--t .Z",-. ;!--; 1771 ! ,,,,! ! ;; ..,!!!;!!!.! 1! 1 1 -4<;'; ; 1.11 A -1'' Ill.i. • :WILL:. -FA-rti-i-t. H:H ".-.7 !.:.i, ; Will; °WI Y!li, :!:1S3 111 --.1 I. Li.._:..:.i..;_:..::......,..;., ..;.i..,...... ...--,..-- —0 !: ii1 ;11.11iiii.' :;;;;;; F.:Hi ;111:111::8 ;11 0 : ; : '''A' :.i , ,,, . 'cl3 -:4-1,1--1-!,;-1:1---,:- z ',,d ,1141H, ;8 1 i u; : 2.""1" 1"''''. ;',11',, ; ; ;-,, GI _,,,, ,,, Le_i_u, F ; i!H Pi,''I i'11 '::;1 i ). : ).;;;1 -121 4.4. ---•;•-.-.--;- H:---: ° 1;,(41::::: 11.,:111,11,11 ::1-;,:ii::: Twill,: iip0 ;;; HI; ,I,Iii; ;Iiiiii uic,,:: i:: :::.; ::: ii.l.;.:.1.;:i..:. ;,.:!.;;; ;; : i; : ' ,.•, . . . : ,;:i: ;: '' 8-+1---f-r-titift .11-1--1, .: 1,1ufgu, 1 ill Iii,,,i,111- .1 I.1 9 I ,,,;;;; • :,,i;',1,; :77,7 :-''-';' _ .. . _. „,.: 8 r;1:11■1:' !"1011';1. Wil'HN -g, 0 ,: ....ziili li [ii.,1:, ,...; , I ....,.:::. ..,„ . il ,,,,,,,:iii, i ! .,,. , ...- ,i:: ,,-. ,.r -,- H7171,1171 WHIIIIHA II . . „. , t---ii-th Hi',i i---H-f -iz ,I,,,,i, , ,,,, z , ,,, m il „„,„ „ i,,,::,,,,:i: -,,,,t,,,,..,, ,, ,.„„ ,1111 ,, H,,,Iii.f, '1 !'ill 4° I''ir”i 1 ••97‘(" i i I'....'l'':'' '' ' ''-- i1:::lilliWIliL a itillil:1 1 ! 11 / I „ " '' . ,,, : — I ' ' - ' ., ,. .,,- ,., . „,,, . s.,,-1.-.' ,,,--,-,-:--!--H-1-1-r-„,,,. ° ''C.i-,'-''', i I,i' ',;::,',,'1-'-1. ':',7 1 ti)(/101'il;i1;ii:, -i--4 'll 1,:i'it1'iiiiIIHCfil. !! 1 / / * / g-i-„,--,--,-rtir „-,--•, ,-•: , • .. ... .:. ;,,,I LI.,,,......,,,,:-}..",„,,,,,,--• -,-• . - 1,1WHif ,!;:;';;,,i;i1;i1 „,,, . •• - • • i4wHill,",,,1:• ......... ,.... ..... ,.... .;••--,,. 01-,--:„ ,„:, ,„ ' R (412 . . . . : • •44. :i_i_';'""'"-"--,- iThl:Hei"""„I,ti •- -iii,"foil ",' !„, „1",,,, i,; y:1 :1,:im,;:i 2 2 ii..0. . . , !:;:;:1' ': ;'-': i : 8-1-p T--7:;r1-1-; imi":4t-H;Hiw!, ;1:11 :;li'l :11!Hilii: I 1 • ' 1'• .-.1;:i -1-.9H-1 ° l' 6- ;-7-t-r!-h.--- ;;-'-,;''----''..-T-T7 7.• ..,.... .,,,,,, ,,,,, I 11..':'ii'l 11 111 1 11 ill'°I;°1411 ri 11 il 11111 . ,,.,, .,., ! •;11!ill,,IHI Hil;',.: • c,4 ..; ,; • ;;!,;.... ;;.!•.,,,;.:.1'...! 1 o o 5 5., . - will:ill: Hi ili•11;1 T ill 1 0 ° -6,* COO MX it t:It t::1 1::I:I:•;:11 2 .;: om 2 / , , i t ,,-1;1), wit r-' 10'■,';'i-'!ikr, . ,P§ c, , .• ;,;;;;.;:;i2 ,,, `J12° 3til■ 1-1 ELEVATION 1 :i11- iii. 11,ill: li !!t:iii Ito s 0 co 0 t. W :: g IHIIIIIII;IIIHHIIII: 0 Z t i,:ilitill it jilt iit titil!t 7w.11"icdidirdiwdiE, Ei ll z d, d%o, :d:,id,;d, m -1;- ;,11 ''''?,ilit . 111111iMiWI j .iii ilii, i(Wri ], 011,1! pi ,ic pa il 1:: :INIII:::IIII; 811 7<-H:111111:111H1:1 ,,•■!;:.;;,,:i 1 8-11.1F I 1:;,,,,,il:,,,i:r, : - • - : 0 ::: 8 •• ••!wiwii,„„, tHi il Iliwpti•,,L, p, •I• ••• .1•1•We7''1;11: ELEVATION - ,. I 1,; : --', -DI ;;;:;;;;;;; I 1 i >Al V,_::;I::.1 j:,.;,..1: : ': ' -'I' Eddidi„, „„„„,,, 5-11--x:ErErfilT,Ili'li TN I I o o o to 0 I --' -' if 1', F1Hjilli.,:, g11111111111LAThil a -•:.-----ot",;„,--;„-, ,.. III iiiiiiiiiiii ›miiii iiiilWil.e ;',T111„II 4.4-+61-i111,N',Ill 121 11111,Iii;4 !",141.1"Il - ,,,,, „mi .4.4...,...H.4.++.4„...f+14.,opi...F*4 1! will! 1111,1 !?2, 1 111:11. 11 ! ! '"__! !! . . . ..„. ,,.. ... HM4,..IEZ,Ht • I "Hi."i..• A, 4: • -' i II 1 el`11'I 1 >T i;;: 1;i;i i i I I-:It 1;;;;;; ,..--;;-1:1-+Tf-t-:-1: 1,.;,:1 :). , til :- :';:t1:1111-1-42) ii 1111; i).,ii,lVpl, fil■'!Illi 11!1P,r''',11!! i .,.',''! A:;:+ , 4....4.4...:4,4---,,.;;;44-1- ialif"T . ._ . - • - • - — 1111:P 1 tii 1,1.U.1.14....1-1.-.1,10-1.--;° III:iii;,1 ilirnili! ' 5221 ;.,, I.I;;; :1,• .. I ;; • •-.. „ . „ • %2 0^i1;111111!.11i iNi'''l .I..; ,. !! -zzlizzi-z-titi-i-trzt>1,111' qm ,,,. :HI ::11: ..IIIII II III Wit Ii tI,,,ttlij I Lio.:: :::: tiiii It.t ,II II CO ..1.1..0.0 11..I.1.1.1 i....,...44.1..k 44_4444 ss-1.4 -f-i-f-.+ i Pill; oil 1.1;:l -‹ W1HigOIH W11111 ;',i itt,lit: ttt''t t i RH Pitt i.Itt gi BA-M.1—W- 0 IlIfip,H1! ;Hi!{H I W !Willi ,1111 ' +(nH !!! 111111 Hill 11 i C0, 11 111 OH, 1!.WHI 4,-4-4+,4i-444-k,'')-itti..41 ti ''ti(l'it . co !!;!!!!!!!!!! ■!!!!;;; ± co ° iipim!!!!, !,!!1>1 I -t'll, HI Ilir.H1 1 :11,-",! m:; ...•• . . I X!! ' ..1 IiH■ii[:11!, iii .1iH i',:}1111,1,11,: !..!lll i, 4+4-rrrti,-e ■.'TIP 7 , —11' ,' HUH 1111111111111 "1(11' Hi, iiiiHlitrit! ,1H11+ 1 , - EdIci iii,„,,E, ild, , + ;Hi::: ,d 8-44044+11144+ ;11,41t, cn o 1 .)„.': ,...,,,, "-. 41114.., . : •--. 111111)- ....., - ) ... I I.; • . 1 L Ce WWI il!!'i ill(-: 'il 11;111i illii 111 L.,.'1 ,_, 1_,,,. =...f.-i 1 i M- 11- -V I--i,' -.." Hii1 !; ,,I i : !1 111,111,!: ! ll Villi!! Wit11:i1.1,! !Il*:ii _.. ., .m 9 a TY-L144•11. 2z oEll'H!,i.'.1•11.'1.:! 1!!11,111, . 0 A -1 ::_::,.: :,„ •.,,,,„,.... . 11 I I 1 1 i 1 i i 1 I i ',1! 1". '.!1.111!!!11111 Ii111 1! .;..;.• i„„-„:. :;„„ m - +0-- ili,1111 1,;PIIHH;;.1 ;,1 1 m ° Hill Wrillili111 1111111 .1 LW Hiniill 1;;;;„ii!, 1 i3 4_,. °T 2r 111. iiiiml, 8 tit-1--;.--r;1-11T; itj11.1-;i >gilitill limi; -:;;;H iii:1,,ww, ii;1111 iii',111ilin1111 73 i F- t 111 1,t:AA I i!::,-, CO < CO ::?:- Fli"-II:T : :t III i t > L•t, Ht::thlt:;IIII C....m t.. ; -i0-- :, ,,i ,,-,,: HP:1HW Villtill 6 i . 1 ,.=3.' ,,,,Lu.,..""LLL i!'■",!,i, :1,,,',I 1! ,i.! m el * .-n. .. .. .o-ri to- ;,: ill; l'iM;;; - , m zm Pm - '8 iriffi-1-111-111:'ill-ttittl ,Hlimi;;;; 01:1111:, n1 Cl) Z X _I;;t4F.2 ,,Ili.f.f. %.*Lii . W,111Hill;',1 IWIMil, IiiHiiI,21 i 1 IIIIIIIIIH.HillIIHI XI = CO a 6 i -- ---•-„---•rn -; .L'HJI) 11,!, 01,1.., I Iti-itriii, i;Hil,„,1 ,, ,,, ,,,,,„ ,i,:. .. n .. C4 0 m 0 73 ' ', :iii LW, .1., i Fi ,, ,,,,,,,,,„ Ilii",,,,, .1,,,,, '•1 N 0 X D. g 9 zm c-) ,;!,,! -11 f ..i.! Z .4-.1..-i' Ilikilli4Dil qxiii 8-1-44.-H4-4.44-:,!4-44,4!,i-1- iiii; „ , ,,,-,— 1, ',1H- 0 E 2 ill p ••••,. ., ,,i, :,, ,,,,, 0 z -, ,,,!,f tl,,.,,.,1,,, „,..,r r„r„:r,,, ■, E■ ,,,i 1: '.1''i!1 -1--H-iwyri-i- ti-rt-rittin ,; ,I;;;, ;,, ,,,,,;; cm cm ILI 1 1 ;:.; ;;;;;;Homw 1111 4111-illilmmil, ; :;1;1,1,1;11 z xi rn iiiiii ,;'; ,,,}1,11 rt•ri-1-1---Iii7 trtri ••••■• 0) ., ,. LH .111.11H41,4.i.i "Illil'il',WIIIILL * 0 0 CT 01 ' II;W:li ill .44.4.-f..,....,H-titi,,,-,,[;!!; I 4,.; 111:1;iiiIiii Wii limwil > = .4 ,,,,,,imii,,,,,,,i,, ,,,,,,,.. ITHI:: ,,!, -, ',4,, r . . ..,. . ,, • .,,,,, :_ „,„,.,„,.. . . .. . .. i -i (./) a .„--,4-4n,, >2, , - ill;;;;I,H,,,,, ;,1 ,,,„ ,,,,„, gil-,-titrrirt-rm 4 I -IT M ttriltiiH,WHI it: Hit;t1;;;Hilt-ktili: e. .1: ,,:•;-: PIII OM 0 -I .•=1 Z 0 b p) 0 !,,,:,,,1:!!,,,1 I.■,,,t 1,,,i.i4.11.!! R;-:-'44-4-41144-i-i•••'•1•-f•-t'tlift4,-t , 4 M 2-11 s' ;;1;;IlivHiliiimiwi 04! 1;;;HH!ip!i C:i nril • 0 0 z .. 0„,„. _„,,,,, , „„,,,,,, E E: 0 1 . ..- ' . .- .. Path:C:\UseraswintenappdataIl templAcPublish 6 Filename: 3.x_sectlons Plot date:Mar 28,2013-12:58:44pm DAD User swinter. ELEVATION 1,,,i c>._ u, 0 Z - - 8 -""4i 877 gi HI:HI':11;!!Iiii!I , ...,,,,. ,.. 0.. • , ,, 1 Lii_j,,,,*;_j„.44..,... .i--H .i- ti ; 81-7 t'1.17,::i'; till' fi IN■M lg -UI il ''-,H'•g÷:•''.';:',I; -•i.: '': 1 i : ill li a 8 El othi 77726!:: ,- ': •, -;,..t,,, 1 1 - .'.9kr. l . _,.......... ...--., J,i•i i',.i'hitel1-LI.111.1 i•''!;-; ;:,,--.!' , : ..:,•',,1,,:!:-' , ,rirHri, li •,111,;:!•.4, • ............ ELEVATION : „„ •••'..•.!„.„„:,•.- ELEVATION 1 - . ; -;:,1'.'': ,,, 8 m 0 1 0 (1, (0,1,'!,1!",i:111 IIIHI ...,....,„. BA1ELINE.1::: .- 10 0 , = , ! • i : ,„:,.!:,:-4-,',_;• ,,,• 8 i. i mil.: , . .. , .. . . . I . . . , . i. ; i I i I / .■., L'' i 1. : .;n6 , :-: I ,,I ,.„,.„.,...,...1....,,.4.,...-.: :: •• ..,..,, ,, ,,, . _ . . . . . ,.- , . ...... . .. ,, ,, ., , ..•.1. , ■ ,. _ ' ;;;! , ' ",--1; -----+ , 2g°F-1 — :' : t7:.:i 1,::, :i;; . ..i.,.:,.„,„,,,.: r • :i- 8 iazox• •1 .; :z •: ; •!WWII! 11 ; T;!:;',:',! !!:1!'; 1:!!! 00> • ;I: i„,,,,,„,...•,,-■, ' •'•'.-'' •i ' ; , ,, -,„ •1,:d. ,.:.,; : .,.• -••-•P -tH\-....T - --i -WI; IIIIIIIIIWIP 1- , •'•:':••: ! 1. 't q : ,,,,. ,_.,,I■i, .,.,. ..„ rn(ner? i \ .. L. .... ''i....!1_,....4.4. -'.'-11"' 1 . I . .r.' ■< 8 I'rir;I I.I i!;!!;,!': i m: .0 ;.! ;;:;:::!:1,m; 8 ; ' . ........:- .-- i--I--;•••-----! ••••• ' 'lW1111H11111111i 1.,,••!', '''', H,,i :.,i' . I:A; , . ,,,w,;i':!;1,:,..,...1 I,-,,'.,•i- 1*,,I'.,,> t- 71-,; :11' ,. , ..,r..,--.1.-p4 . :i -:_ 10 l- i.,i: . ,:., , , ,...„.. 1 8 , : ;,;I; I;•;;:. P- , . . . 1 ,, •i.,-,;--1.--i""r-Fliiiiil, 8:-H1,1!!!!!!!!)::;:„.: 0 : :- ; : 1. l'::: ; o x 1 I,! ' ;'-.;:. ... ;:+: . . , , . :.. : . , . .. . : _..•..,:_ .. : ,..,.._... ; ;.•.-, . ; ...:....; m .. . . •, . 1 .r-i-i--1--.--:--H-I-- t:-,---;-::: i::: q Ic‘o' 4, , ___*,,___ ! , 8:11IiiH141ill IIIIIII .., Thi!-;:: ,1:1! ',; t.1- , .: T; - I: t,, '•Z -4--; 8 ; I ifii H il'i:-.1.„i..'„LI. 1111111 ,!: .I __1„....1,.„,■ „---„.1.-..-.4 ...4-_ _._.,_,,....,-....... , 1 1: ',LI--Li' - -,1 'r.''' ' 1.1. [ i i ' . 1 . ... BASELINE::i.,. 4 Hill441:1;11,, ww, ofrisreowl, 0114;imiwIlli!!!!1 ? :.:,.:.,, ,,th-1-77-7. g-f-'-'-7-'• o . •:'!'- .,.. •, ',,,,:.:.• ,,:' .• g • 4 :Iil:', „ . .. .• , .. ,• -■ - .: . . i'•1 i,r,,! H i .3.i.4....4.1.4.:,..4--1. ............4...-.....H.......... ,. 1,1111H1Hi'. iliitH ......... , .. :•.,.'.,■., - •, ,- . „ i,.•!,;1.:,H r I 1 I Ell; 1''i 1 . -H-Hr j 1H E-•:.• .....1.1,••••!1!41....1....t„.„.„.,.....,-,_. _•••• ,. ° HiMill,WHI IIiii!! 111111 - 8+HttyrILT1-iwwi, ------- rm,;;;„,;;; .- ,. ; , ,.. ; ,,j,,,i,,:ji441 ir■ri -1-1,ItH'il!Hi? 1WH I 1 E / 1 :1• ,.1,.,I t; : ,it,.±,_.:,;_,J,H,:,...._,„H!..:.4.-'' I ,.. .. . . . . . ... ...„ . , ,... , ___....., , _.......... .______,„ . . , ., - ' 414 I l'a ° WWI lilwhfi,:! ... ...., , .— . , , ., , . . ,,;,,,,..,, ,,r i,,•,,.!,,;, . . . . .„ I . •. , - •• „.__ .--„ _ ,,,,, , .•1 4 .„ „„„ 2 r!-°- -1' '': ;: 0 :!!:!!':;;H:!!,!!::;'!;";: ;,!, I 1,13 .. . „.. ,..,•:, ...„,.. 8-1-1111-ii,""rih 1 1 ly 1 ifi 1 1 1 i . co ■1,--,,--,-,••-'. :, ; ', g---'t--'-• ,7-"T"ET.TT 1. ; , :,1:, snoR 111,,I11. ,, I.4,,,, 8 , '1''-,' ,."-,•,li,i•W CO •.:'1,; • ' *'.1 , g> ji'I I 1 1 l 1.-1-141. i 011111 11iffi. iHIII:Hili 1 w 1 i:' 1-4-44:- -- zi IR2 !,11;,H! !!!Iiiiilli!! • ›c,,:•,I, ,,,,•,,,,,,,,, fin, x; •: ;... ; ,1• 1,,i r 1111!!;,1.,41.141...L.:Lli.o...1.,,.: -.?,.:,ii,: E;: ,;,:,,,,i , 0 . ;.:;,:--1,,.,iiii_LL..444!....1...,,, 8.::11::+::::t-,-„,:-T.,-4H 1 . : 17-14-4-1-!--:i.0',',', '-!',!7 g se, 8--.----:1-r"! :!: :1:;I: i; 2 it2;;I!!!"11;!!,!!!!",!:' ::. •I':: !;it;; 2 r, (,0"." '.? ...1:-.: --;;;.i--i-";11-"irtittrtlltf"tili1i T 8 .... . ....,,. H,,,,,,H. 8 I, I=, .,I' ,,,,,,„, Cffi , 1 1 ••. .. , ' , e !,,I,,,!,,,, IIIIII• • ! '!-H-1-+hitttt7t 7.T:-.::.:•,... ..-..1111 8-7.-;i7-,,, i .1, t,• i■ :. :,1t[;:,, ,;,,,• ,! :Iii,! 1:i ,I!ii 1 iiif•i•E••1 144.:Lill "4 . •_j I : ,.....„, . . . .,,,,.....,,,,„, 1 2 1 I I 1!14!L-111.-14..;,4-1.1.4+14-4 ll'i'''11,,,"iiiii -F-4.--f--.,-.17.1:,.;I:111;11W Wi till ,iit,ihwIk !I:IH!! "rr-7:17-',1' 1!:1 !:L i 1 I i 1 t!t.,,,,: WI Wi! l'.' iiiiill''',illhIll _, 1111 iHiiili_j_114,! HHI4 , 8 .41171 1 • : .,, 84-.-77-!. :i:i !t; -W!' ,'•' l'iWIHWIHIC fi! 411;!HIHI!IPW' 4 1!,,I : ; il.; : ',I/I. ' .'. ... 1 11;11 I 0!1 •-, 1011-WillIlli! . t„ .1,•,...,.„..„..,..•,... ,,1 . - to . w 8 0 • o • - - o !,1?i!IH,1:m;'' i 1•:.! 0 _ . ' -.,-,,.i- -;• i •-1; !I i • . ' , ..L2. 8 6, .,Iii!'-„,,,i1",1,111i1‹..TI[1.1.11..•1....iiiii_iiii....F.I.iiiii.. 8 ..1._,... .....i. ...-----i-,•-!:-.-tH: H-"--; --,,,! .• ° ,: ELEVATION ••• fa.„„:„ .,„-„„._ .' -.....---- ---hr-7,17-1 it!r !!„ .i.,• ,, 1.1 — 7--,":'HI;;.:1,1. - ,i;i: ::,'!.:.:" ,::: ;1:: . 1 i irpLLI.I_..1414+144; . 0. . w 8 ;;;1;;;;;;;Ii:!!!!; ::,;'; -"j,:!;:"..1.4.._-').-1-•-"--ri-1-- •TIT! :;;::'!;!;::.;--1:' ' 4-"Hittrt-' !Ttt 'i: li......a.,-,-.--4-,r,,,-- ; ,,„ ; '. 1 <__,:. ":7- I" !-I ;ii ', . • I;IHIwillii,H1!:* I ,• .L.L.; f.-,.----,2 Kr!, .. .. 7:7;!Hir: H>q! ! - - : „ 1; ":1,1„;; .;;;: % WI-4- 14y.,,,i4H.4 r, ,,•:_.--4.--,-,-.,,,,, ..., rTi 11,1,1ww • H1 Rrn iii 8'-',-itti"Tarl'-717 ! rf, 1 w Hilillw Hirt•Low ..... .:..........,.i.,_-,...-,-,,7""?*3., -1---Fr, .: :,:'': I,, X i -I'1'; ';•!I: ti! L.J.1':1 ''.:4-H 1 1 li IT HI 1 11 iiiii I:A 1 1 " •••,:,; rr,E --T•'::: . :Th- . t:1,...*r->-,--:-.1- -4-4,-H-1-ii' N;;r + 1,I' . .i ,- ;:1r ;!' :.;': . :,,,,;: , ii :i. :Lt.; ,s- .-.=.1i; --..-----1-:-.---;-!--;-1-': 'Ftr":77171-71 5 IlililW1,w;'::!Ali "-:--,;;;;;;!--4--!' 8 : I' ;, I:i IP:WHill,110-1241 1,. u::::,;:.;!:; -till:-11-;.:1:fri:::!!„,!', ',THI'M:H Til;iii : -----,-r--T ,H i—TT-r i IL '.HHH:r . ..;... .: -.:,..., , „ I„Li.,,..:_i_p. : -.:: 1,4-';-.-1-,-Ft'en. --17-!''''.:11,1 A ,., — - , . :1 „14.-__LI.._44.-4.--4-1.,,,-,-,, 0 :.'.•H.t.JHH ;' .,.i :.,,, 4V,,,,::::,-.}--'7. 0 _'-;;!'!'”; 1'' -i :!';•le' ;I.,':!!,''',-,• '!!' 18'!'''''' -ii.111-,11.'111.1'i-,illili'l,''11!ir:1-!111-1111:1!:!.1,Iiiii!li 1 ' L2.4-;',.,--L-Li-;-,' -..!-tftr71-77 .. ,'i, :• I:I: 'i: _...., !:: °R; H:77Hit---- 'S:.Ti: n I:;r. illiiiii1,11!li !■:!.!. 8 fr„,,,,„,..„ ,„:„ H_,,,,,,i,...,,,c)HT„,,, i„,:„. ,,,,t,„,,.,,,i,_7,:i, „.., . .. . . . . ... : ...„.... .... „...„,„„ , :. _. _.... _ , . . . „. .. . _ . ,. .,... EviseLiNE ,, , t .., _ w,,,,i,,,,,..,,,,_:,,,..._ - .. ..., :.... , , _ coo 0 ,,, .„.. .-,1-. „„,,, „.,,, ,.._.„1„...1.„...„,..,,.....i. ..._ _ . ., La ., , ..i. f 0 . -10 w. 0) Y ; : !' L.,„ •„:„.4„...-'1.-H, o cs' -„ ,..7±:r1:1777.T:„; i,„I, -r „ :"LEA ,. .,.„ . , ;a,, , , ' -I • ..- - -.7 R › a < 0-,:tr.-1-..,:,.;, •.,--0 , ' II I. , .. ___.,...... ... -< U) 2 .. •,. , .. . ,, ,, .. ,. . — : , _....,..._.........,....„...... .,,, , ................,.._,.. , t ., ,, , ,-,., _ ,I z ,... > . ' == > - ; 0 m 8 m m 73 :a g • 6,- ._, -.1 I. =, :. ,:.■ .6, m 0 Z 8_:__;_-::--;-..--,,--H --!------1-p 7 -n m co T 6 ,.. „ . .. x i oo xi 0 (DO rn F :„H. „......„.„„.......L- 0 XI 3:3• z m 0 g i . :.-, . , .. C) .1:7 = ce. - - 8-,---,-;--;:±-------------,---:- 0 Z PI 8 - ':::' -, : ! cm , „, z I . , , ...... :. , . ..„ ..„..._...„.... , - z xi 'Fri ,p. P .....[ . ., , .......,. , . . . , . .,....,..„, .. .., ; , :.', %X, ,. ■ 7,;:', 1 ct.i. I G7; a . 2 o NJ IT ....' >'o Alma. f 0 , o x >c 4 • gi- 4) rri z 0 -n ...... t,. c._ 2 ., ° to c m --i -n > ° I :lc) - 0 I , , 1 0 c.,0 8 Lo t7; Path:CAUsers1swintenappdatallooshtemplAcPublisk0 Filename:C3.xsections Plot date:Mar 28,2013-12:58:49pm CAD User.reinter. -41 Ltil .. , . . .. „ ELEVATION . ... •' :;•:• • ; • •T - ' ' ''' ',: .-,''' I . ' ELEVATION - - Imi o 0, o w 8 i :111111ill'i ., . , . m 1 . rg i 0 0 --,. ! I !!ri;;;:;!!..1: HI.:;,1!!:!!!!-H;i!!!-I.. :10 ... .. ..!!!!!:I:: ! ,SAM T ' - L:'L' , : zo . : , . -. — ''"' ,.' - :> .- o . . . . . . . '' ': '-' '' . ' 1 'P opc 8-.':.'T i 'Ll''F -114 co f. [I t'''L,i1,,,,!:\Iil,wliiH: -.,,,,, -,I.:H.!:,y1-:11..HI, itJ Apy c';'n2 ,,, , .. ,!!; , f ,>: 11. . :?-'4.' . 1,-2 m •-i- -i-1-1'itt-"-H; --(It 1- -!.-r : .: 2': ":, :, mt-' @;:•!'";',;'' x' ':' . • • •.• : • . : ..,,, ••• 2!"-J - i 1 :': ). 5 ••, '.,.,,• 2›: ,i t :1 :Li...J.: 8-17';'," , :: V-',.., , -: t*iot ::111111;i1H:. P . ": . • . . .. , '''!:1' ',I'. . HAH, 2.„ml I111:kijill: --4;,; ,, .. ! ,,,.,.:...!..,,, .!;p1 HI: HI: `..!`" ,E,9 1 H',PL. I:: gm! H ..,!„,„vait ...., , ,„:„.: - , - ; ' : 0 ,,T,,,:4,„ : +,;,, ,,, :: c::, 8- -',2P,T1-7 - •rnr1 5VPill', !!>a!I, 1,;.,'',,II. ;IMMi:1,1Hill i,1 •1*Itgl , . Tz 0 m,I*0 1.1P4.4-'-!..11.- ,4 il+ II,"1 ;!!! .! Hmoti,..w,„„ ..H: .. ,,•••. , ..... __ :.. „,„ + . " . ' ' 9 ' -•; • •'•,• , ,. , - _ • . , . a,•:;1- 4.-H--1-1+-f-1t7:11-im-H: p ---1---,'•••.•-• -,---1 --, ,;',,:;,'""", ' ', ,•,, Cn M -I -0 ;1+ ;;;Ayl -, .:;•_. . , : . . : f; 4 ..,,._.. , __,,..„__ _ f,' , ':'-',J.-,;,!: > q L-.1 m .11.,: icl, lf,T :i .1-,, ,,- ..._.. r;• .-,441',1,-_,,: A-i'..J .,,... , ,,. 0 , zo ,,:,„, z , ..., -',,,t •il a,' 1 , !it ! , .IL„,..„,„.L.L.4„.1R.,..,.„, m EiiiS0.0;i4 o 4,0 0 ; : :„Ii; II.: :;:: 2 rn d li,iii. !IW Witirn '1 /HiHHI,', : Hu) 9 ,;iili IiHil * 2 i;41 '..1.....,..,..L4•4 Z : ::■ IV: 'i';.:;- '!: °: 4; ''-"i••••1.M... '1' 'n f;::: . . , _. •' • • ; - :::;: i;:! !!1,11D,L !1?!.-!!. L..1.;: :: t.n 2 (I,' -oci,,, 8 11', .i. iiiH! !Ht 8--hrt-trtri cr;, FT.-11-111,! !!!1,i-iii,!,!!-; •.! %-..- NH W.WHI: llilLilijilki i ••, 1 ;r '• :,,,1, •' • •1' , ,•'• ' Z • r r • 0 0 '•',,i!!f• i 1!, ,, „ •••, . , ..44...; I 11-,: '".!-!- H:Dx2. 87-TIVili!!! !IIIIII:'"; ',', :-.:•,:ii;!!',IL!, , :":1::'::: I 11;11;!'„ti wi g ;•;-,,,ii„,;:-- .. 0-9rn- 4■T°, 'I ILA :1:"11 ti1 - ■;:, :•1-:: II ,H,! iil-,Ii];':1131., 7 I M A W i 1 M 'i 'i, ; :_, :. , ,... , , ' . '-''-,--Z: . ...—-., .. ., A,F*1:71:111:Ibt;M:1 :.!;i.1,',.;1;.;•;.;.; ...„,:,-)1. !!p2 :e .:1 :1-;:::::::::,:;:: :; ; :::: _ m31.4.4.... ;•••_, 1_,-;-,:->•,, aMli< W WHI Fli +2iLdril!iii I P,,. ,i;Wi il,!!!H ;!--1,. ! Ht-;: H m I .. :_. , „ 11 to. 1,,,.fK1 C: 1... 644_4_144 ;.4 t-1-7..171-t-iii,4 M o iil , 11 WU IiH"'ll'llii: Ai 7 :i;;; !!;HHI Ii,111;! ,,IHIHH,,:,!.!... .....4.1....,4;4.4„4..._:_i_..,i,--,-----=-i-li-it-c7,-- - ;-44e! !4-4;4 211., i, l'hil.1 irimil:-:-11111 [1!HIII „ „„ .,.; ;„ , ,_ ;!;,m1 ! 1, 1 iliiil!!!IIIIHOILilii ,„.1 ..,.. „_, . ;•,- i‘lii1 , /1!1;! !Hiil,!-.',;;', !'' !! 0 — I 0 o o .11111 h 11111WI1111: II ; 1Ii 00i1 :1; ;;;;;;; -4g11H!L:H: "111111111HTh111111 i 0 o o -.. -• o o o 1=111111WHI ; 1;'1iI1i1 5 B V V T o I ; 1.,:.- : -1i: 2 0, : : PS I1:'L::, w!,;•-r;:.::•• 2;;,2!:!:::•:,;:-:- i UliwIH iiH!, :i.„..,,,,,:,: c.. . ,'. ..t. ,,- ,,.;!: ;-I' Ii..,1,, 1 • HH VH,'"' :: gs2',' . , : ! :.,! „,s611 co t! ! 1:!" ;!! l.,..:', rn I'll! 01,., 1,,i il, snAl . .. ... . .. 9 2/ ,0 - ,,!!! !:-!,-1!i I;!,, t,,...;,!! ;.,,!,,•, gi: _. „ . .. ,.... 1 I ,,,, , .. -,1 8A c gil, iiiHNcii:; ' I'HHHL,Z3L1M.;', M''.:,, o 02 wIi;:! : !- !!!! g.' 6) i'lt, H24:4.,-.i-4- fg Htl:flinT, H,IH3,_A , z • rwiHiiiiww›Iiiiihi• H , +1,'i 1,'.;:',!!,!V !.11!: P•P':1 !.,111!wkiii2,,wii -1 1;1,n, : , .„, 0-, ., HHIHHHHHIFll""Hi:H.: I :6 1!" !I;! ! !1!!!'11::.: II x1!: !! :! *HI IIHITH"IIII!"!HIH ELEVATION LUNA HON 4, i -,:ii,, I ... ... • . . 8 5 - -- ,, ! F,-,, !!!!,!!!!;,,,H , • io, . u. o o i I: 8 IITHHILi: ',:ll Hi,.:::'L! ] ,' '.' ':: 1 il l'iTiMiiltll Hi+ ';',IiIIIL.WH;111M.1,:ii! t :II ,..,,,■,;:L.,-,,,! .,. $-"fi•EI:.!!„„,■-',.1..!!1!:, t1-1112:"'HIIHIli HI; LIIIII Iii!III,HH!!!!; ; f-4> 1 :'pal :1- 1 P 1 f-,"'1 :11...11.ki 1.itilil...L1 .::: I F3 21 :1 1,.._'_,..L-11 I :,I,;i.;,:i 1121 :,1:!' ',I 1 ilairltni:IIIII:11:::11 I :' !::.'L clA21 8i--: ALH mr! . . . LiiiW i'i!HIHHH.ii!!.!!: ITT IV!E 1:'!!!1 I.! ;I!'111!,,,:!\11•[ilil!I k!:!•i-!!1 _,..,,,,........„.....„. .. . . . . i;i!1!!!i.I!;;,!;! I 1,!!: !] :; tl,):•th!--E :-!-NH.--; .•i:-• 0"-1.1---‘,! -Hi.,!!"-THI!.1,1;-111111t _ . . . ... i! !! !''','!•.'!.!!!!-!,:!!!' !!!!!!!! ,„..„....,,,.., ... . , 0....,1.1.i 11,1pH ... „ _. , .• . .. ,,_,-.;__., , ., _.ri- ___,H,L,-._!!, ,,•-• ,-■\„4„: •-,:t1 i,...,,„,•„! .•!,:i t!..!;.„ . 1 li!!!!!!!-;! E-'1\-!: ! .1....i.,. .....:,....itmi_.4. 1 • - • • — . • ,, .. . . _ . .. . ,. , • . . . ,. : , : :. i 0 . !:.-. ,,- . - 1::-.!, \-;.! '• 3 4* 1.) -. . . . . . ,, , . „: ,. , • . _ ..... L' ,,,■ •-_ 0) Z 1 i; i' ' ;-- -;- -- ' ; I"i .-i ,,, % ,LI•4••••;:,LP' L14-••TI--1 I 1--I----i{ ' m ig . .... . . . 0 13 I hike .li:: 1 •:,11:! g A er::,.: 2s 1,!;!:::: ! : - . ,I!• m . •..,. :... . , r. glH:!! ::1 !1.1.i.lii-!1HIHI. H!IH,1,1, <- a z u, i'<;:' ,; :,•; : , . t 1-811;'11 I1-1 : I: : :: : ; H WH,:;:1•'....,..1..;LL.,,I:-:: i 1 1:11 i 1 1 r,111;1 I Hit 111 C.. "Iii-,:y•-:-!: -.F.. :-,. •-f,:• T M ,. I. _:., ,!:,, 8 _ IHII.: Iiili,!!!;i1,1,1111-1'. -ri m $ 0-77-,, , . I .,,. oTri M CA z ;;;°'.ki ; '': 'i' I Ti.: ,,,.,;,, , ,,.. , iiii1111,111 HAIN! 732 CO 111,,,H.; :,,1 0) 0 rri z 0 ;. ', ,,_,...,_,,,.. ,..„...„...................,..;. -111,■,.,,, ...v .„ i•• 1-ttri-TTITtn •"i'l Cli :i!, -0 73 > 4) '' ; l ;;H !:::;',ir: P, -; W,1--..-,!:,.- Zm C, g 9 T--4-,--- + tif.------t:---!--'.-- 7 ; .,34...!...F.4 -„___A---,„--4,--,- or= x m q 8 1_, ;;,:-.;:• $_,;.; oz - 0 ","-;,•:0 ;:::1; ,.; -, :. od .; 1;;W: :1-;:. ..-. •- ./. ; ; : Iiiiili;111.11 iLL•rgli :1-1-1-1:4-1-1-L+4.-41-4•4;%x 1-1; 8 ;;;;Ip. -:!!:: (9, ::!:, r",c,:: ' ' ' ; I: >- ! • - • Z X rvi 0 z HH.,. ',, ;•H ,L ,;, • .1.t..Li.: -,i../....:....i.,.......7,...i.....,,,.. 1;;;, - ;ii; f..i -4 m 0 M : -! -i-rlIf.-4:4: If m /1,!.:---1--- -.0,;7 ; 8 . . j I r.H-A , ty . k m 8 1 i 1 ,III !.1 -al.! ;: , ... ;-; ;,!„--;::!;,,,H I:: zs. : !!:,-1.,. ::. ,-- .! : _ . .,...:. , __ _ .. +53t--!; , M t (1) 8 -' !.,-i !•:,-• , - !. , +>::! !,! ;;,--1, !- 1,• orn, . ).= !.,. - •• I - ! : --11■ 1 .1!1•! !' ' ! .... -...4) .. .. 8. - :.'11,- -ft--.F'"-tq 9 H 1 61'1111i1W 2ii x --I - -124--:- -":-------- ----+:7-- AA, -1K H'HIlifi mi, mil- 20 w i i ... . . . .,, ,:.:. „HHHH, .i HIL. ,,,,,: -. . .. : +. ,-. 1. ,:. . , ' I : : : ' "tz.4^5: 0 Z . 14,,1._:, I ; -4 17 9 2 H-t-t--,--iT.-, i.'. -:•--ip, r,... i.4 11 ....... .... c 811,1 I i) Om SI M mL::•1.-, I-- LI', '' ; ;. : 1-1. .:' i HiT l'i.' Li Z 0 b fa gi - 0 0 H : III!- l'!:' N -i en ; ...!..,■ • i ! ........! ...i I rri C) ! rr ....., - .-- , ',.-,' , i,.,,, ,,, ,,,''i:,,,, ,• g • ELEVATION • , Path:U:IPROJECTSkSEAtWATER RESOURCES\2011 Prajecle1211155 Maynard 8horeline105_Graphics GIS_ModelingtCAD190,_percent1D Filename:D1 x_DETAILS Plot date:Mar 28,2013-01:05:50pm CAD User.awing. -, N ELEVATION 9 igtlEXEX82gAX N O N O N '� m S3 m m q \\ PI W I _ c gg �$y \ iii I t QiXyw cv=i Q � m m R g N F ►�.4. \\ Lfg7t4.t•tr,4k 41 i614 1 gz ;1 1 I IV?.fe fir.. b n Vero i Q I _, , SP.°i z U;�. "; �? m No fi .-r A 0 i P/ N 0 V y y P� ° AP Arp m R 4mm Rio p> 2# MAX iP PAP 7. -7- ■- ri - '' 7 g,, 1 1 x 4A ie 0 1 . ' , & I IdA5411 -,0 -r . o - . .. . 41 41 ; mg Exi 2Ae zr .0 1- 1 ° N ° E 0 m gl i 11' ›° fi 4 - _ 0 1 i T m I 1 A 1 . 51 II 141! �vnnaa ! ! m! �N w o F n o <n cn ' OR la S'2t a m s S2 g : �j = —' Si > C Z m N ` dc 6 91 ! ! ' I i -1 1 A ° 8% is L ki I''VIM �� v>i C m E £ $ 1 { s O -rl g3d N `%t^t{liret 07 0 '' 2 I Y1\ cx > 0 1 ii c Ig 01 M h DS $ 1 � m �� g ; !: ;: :i! i 11 1 in ppzz p yQy N i sP Al .. T, ,2 1 O r ` ur I q M 3' s _ %: yD A t7 ;.: �., rA R a� i M ms's �� m W I PI !I 'F! x 3 it :61 R $ !-1 z in `, c m : iiJi rYmDi � 4 Ff43 45 g $ 8 I ›D " Pi di m Ar O O 1 = 4111111P2 •R V C75 d 3 : rn F' $ N A r2 . P / , 14 Ail' wir__. jai [] F: s' Pi _ ..,,„, a 'r11111 0 0 m il, It 44 � m 2 ID „14 P m 0 n o : ?R ` A cn Q 2 . zx c338 c O s my a y2A bo - Z _m 37> x o; g o=p � t X O Z c 0') .-‹ .mom '40 - Nt'7 y T,3 A 0 ° °x i D 0 1 1 I— 1 z~o O �a Z o N i II1 R% - a ._ >� V. Z M b o co rg > m N;g °Z i ii ocr1 m O A v D ° is 4 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:49 PM To: KevinL Lo G. Fr' Subject: NOSC Application at Discovery Bay MLA13-00088 C4g/f.1 Hi Kevin: / I have started looking at your application and have a few preliminary questions for you. 1. I do not see a building application so I assume you would like to complete the shoreline permitting prior to applying for a building permit. This is okay, but I just want to make sure we are on the same page. Let me know if this is incorrect. 2. Would you give me 3 copies of the following: • Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plan, 100% Design; • Waterline Replacement Project, 90% Design; and • Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project, 100%Design. I will need all of the above copies to scale as 11"X 17"for noticing the application. 3. Jefferson County Public Works contacted me recently about this project. Would you clarify which portions of the project NOSC is responsible for and which PW is responsible for. It sounds like there may not be funding for some of the PW project components. Does that sound right to you? It is a big project so I may have more questions as I dive into it. Thanks, Donna,Frasthoinv Associate PCanner/Wet(andSpecialisst Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 cifrostholm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 August 28, 2013 °~ V TY.- ��STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF �.<,.t'��@ REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV m ■ 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1076 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 282023 HWY 101 MLA#: MLA13-00088 Dear STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff has reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and has determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of Community Development Staff c: File NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION KEVIN LONG 205 B W PATISON ST PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 JGITEW tr August 28, 2013 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA13-00088 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and -. ment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal re.•irements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: This proposal is subject to environmental review and thre old determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: Comments must be received within fourtee (14) calendar days or by September 11, 2013. If no written response has been received withi ourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC a. inistrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if yo. desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your at -ntion to this matter. Sincerely, j\W c: , \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT AppSubstComplt.rpt 8/28/2013 Phho . 5-- \`4 4007- P iammerta,/,. .. r . w - J t .10 464-14-di 1 -n ____. ,2ge , 01_1 °i 0 D 89- q _ ,,) zeD ,sh, -L„ 70zd — ,a. p... c, — al Ai-, 611.a ; \ �-P- 0/ 1 dl'L.., - i/ ___Aio, r T i I • CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902231004 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type t 1T Planner BLD92-00143 THOMPSON F , Application Received: 3/5/1992 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/13/1992 Case Finaled: Deck added to a commercial establishment and change of use n:' /of 1.) Approved under Interim Zoning: IZ07-92 BLD92-00745 HUMBERT F Application Received: 11/18/1992 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/2/1992 Case Finaled: 4/4/1994 adding an espresso cart to existing commercial development 1.) Approved under Interim Zoning IZ49-92 BLD93-00476 GARRISON F Application Received: 7/8/1993 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/13/1993 Case Finaled: 1/8/1994 commercial business: deck only 1.) Approved under IZ 39-93 BLD93-00489 MOEGLING F Application Received: 7/13/1993 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/21/1993 Case Finaled: 9/2/1993 counter tops, shelving &3 compartment sink, IZ39-93, certificate T1 occupancy shall be witheld until adequate provisions for toilet lavatory facilities have been installed. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD93-00729 GARRISON F Application Received: 10/6/1993 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/12/1993 Case Finaled: 10/28/1994 two restrooms/addition: IL39-93 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD94-00056 GARRISON F Application Received: 1/24/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/11/1994 Case Finaled: 7/21/1994 Repair interior& place on foundation:IZA94-0014 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD94-00462 GARRISON F Application Received: 7/11/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/14/1994 Case Finaled: 8/7/1995 Commercial Sign No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD95-00085 GARRISON F Application Received: 2/28/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/13/1995 Case Finaled: 10/31/1995 Commercial alteration; ice cream &espresso No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD95-00198 GARRISON F Application Received: 4/19/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/30/1995 Case Finaled: 11/1/1995 Free standing sign No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD96-00004 BERGNER F Application Received: 1/2/1996 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/4/1996 Case Finaled: 1/17/1997 propane tank installation No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD96-00023 BERGNER F Application Received: 1/16/1996 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/17/1996 Case Finaled: 2/11/1997 Takeout pizza shop No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD97-00054 GARRISON F Application Received: 1/29/1997 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/19/1997 Case Finaled: 1/29/1998 RETAIL STORE, INS TALL 6' DAMP No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR97-00023 GARRISON F L.MARK Application Received: 1/29/1997 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/19/1997 Case Finaled: 2/19/1997 RETAIL STORE, INSTALL 6' RAMP No findings, conditions, or permissions found. IZA94-00014 GARRISON A Application Received: 3/7/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/7/1994 Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner OTH93-00028 GARRISON Received: 6/8/1993 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/18/1993 Case Finad: well approval No findings, conditions, or permissions found. + e of ZON95-00012 GARRISON '1VI`GREWELL Application Received: 4/19/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/2/1995 Case Finaled: 11/1/1995 Freestanding sign 1.) The illumination of signs shall be shaded, shielded, or directed so as not to adversely affect surrounding properties or public and private rights-of-way or create a hazard or nuisance to the traveling public, or to surrounding properties. 2.) No sign or part thereof shall consist of rotating, revolving, or moving parts; consist of banners, streamers, or spinners; or involve flashing, blinking, or alternating lights. 3.) The total square foot of the sign shall not exceed 64 square feet per business. 4.) Only one side of a double-faced sign shall be counted when determining total square footage. The square footage of the sign shall be calculated by the outside dimensions necessary to frame the information displayed. 5.) There shall be no more than two (2)on-premise free standing or projecting signs or combination thereof. 6.) Signs attached to or painted against the structure to which it relates shall not be computed as a part of the overall total square footage or number. 7.) All signs shall be continously maintained. Signs that present a hazard shall be subject to abatement. 8.) Free-standing signs shall include mreasures to restrict vehicles from passing beneath them. 9.) Signs shall be incorporated into the landscaping of the site when landscaping is provided. 10.) The Jefferson County Building Official should be contacted to determinate if a building permit is required for the sign. COM11-00003 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ F Application Received: 1/6/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 1/7/2011 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD08-00085 MLA07-00572 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ I F Application Received: 2/27/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/25/2008 Case Finaled: 6/11/2009 Shoreline Exemption for Restoration of Salmon Creek/Discovery Bay Estuary Fish Enhancement Project and demolition of 5 wood buildings. 1.) The project is to enhance fish habitat along a northern portion of Salmon Creek and a southern portion of Discovery Bay. The project area consists of five sites (one is south of Highway 101; four are north of Highway 101). Fish enhancement includes removal of fill, wood waste, old buildings, and a culvert that blocks fish passage. The project area will be graded to the elevation of adjacent low marsh habitats and some tidal channels will be created. The overall goal is to restore estuarine and nearshore conditions and processes to benefit salmonids. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 9, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat areas, wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas. 3.) A Special Report was submitted in conjunction with the application to address the wetlands in the project area. A Wetland Assessment Report&Conceptual Mitigation Proposal was prepared by Pacific Rim Soil&Water, Inc. for North Olympic Salmon Coalition in April 2007. This report was submitted to Jefferson County Department of Community Development on October 4, 2007. 4.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 5.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. The proposed project is not expected to affect aquifer recharge areas. 6.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. The project is not expected to affect geologically hazardous areas. 7.) A Type 2 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream (Salmon Creek)will require a setback of 150 feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 2 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. The proposed project is not expected to affect seawater intrusion. 9.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Re 2 effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applicati �g.lots of record. A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a l isttel®F C loride O l ses 6V- above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L). _... 10.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 11.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 12.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 13.) The project was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, acting as lead agency. An Addendum to Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)was issued on December 7, 2007. 14.) The site plan, as submitted for the shoreline exemption application, that was received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on December 20, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated March 17, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) This approval is for a shoreline exemption and demolition of 5 derelict buildings only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 16.) The parcels in the project area have been designated as Rural Residential 1-5, AP-20 Commercial Agriculture, and NeighborhoodNisitor Crossroads under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 17.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 18.25.090 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a propsed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 18.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 19.) Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on December 30, 2007 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or Washington Department of Ecology. 20.) Permit approval is based on all waste being disposed of at an appropriate permitted facility. 21.) Mitigation for impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers shall be conducted as specified in the Wetland Assessment Report& Conceptual Mitigation Proposal prepared by Pacific Rim Soil &Water, Inc., dated April 2007 (received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on October 4, 2007), and in the planting plan for the spoils site letter prepared by North Olympic Salmon Coalition, dated January 22, 2008 (received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on January 24, 2008). 22.) The project shall comply with the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion, and sediments during construction. 23.) There are no single-families residences or septic systems in the project area; therefore, a review of the proposal by Jefferson County Environmental Health department is not required. PRJ08-00022 MLA07-00572 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 2/28/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Shoreline Exemption for Restoration of Salmon Creek/Discovery Bay Estuary Fish Enhancement Project No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 3 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Stax7 11' ner SDP07-00073 MLA07-00572 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ °'; A Application Received: 10/4/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/18/2008 Case Finaled: r Shoreline Exemption for Restoration of Salmon Creek/Discovery Bay Estuary Fish Enhancement Projend Of demolition of 5 wood buildings. 1.) The project is to enhance fish habitat along a northern portion of Salmon Creek and a southern portion of Discovery Bay. The project area consists of five sites (one is south of Highway 101; four are north of Highway 101). Fish enhancement includes removal of fill, wood waste, old buildings, and a culvert that blocks fish passage. The project area will be graded to the elevation of adjacent low marsh habitats and some tidal channels will be created. The overall goal is to restore estuarine and nearshore conditions and processes to benefit salmonids. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 9, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat areas, wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas. 3.) A Special Report was submitted in conjunction with the application to address the wetlands in the project area. A Wetland Assessment Report&Conceptual Mitigation Proposal was prepared by Pacific Rim Soil &Water, Inc. for North Olympic Salmon Coalition in April 2007. This report was submitted to Jefferson County Department of Community Development on October 4, 2007. 4.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 5.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. The proposed project is not expected to affect aquifer recharge areas. 6.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. The project is not expected to affect geologically hazardous areas. 7.) A Type 2 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream (Salmon Creek)will require a setback of 150 feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jeferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. The proposed project is not expected to affect seawater intrusion. 9.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L). 10.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 11.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 12.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 13.) The project was reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, acting as lead agency. An Addendum to Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)was issued on December 7, 2007. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 4 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 14.) The site plan, as submitted for the shoreline exemption application, that was received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on December 20, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated March 17, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) This approval is for a shoreline exemption and demolition of 5 derelict buildings only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 16.) The parcels in the project area have been designated as Rural Residential 1-5, AP-20 Commercial Agriculture, and NeighborhoodNisitor Crossroads under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 17.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 18.25.090 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 18.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 19.) Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on December 30, 2007 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology. 20.) Permit approval is based on all waste being disposed of at an appropriate permitted facility. 21.) Mitigation for impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers shall be conducted as specified in the Wetland Assessment Report&Conceptual Mitigation Proposal prepared by Pacific Rim Soil &Water, Inc., dated April 2007 (received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on October 4, 2007), and in the planting plan for the spoils site letter prepared by North Olympic Salmon Coalition, dated January 22, 2008 (received by Jefferson County Department of Community Development on January 24, 2008). 22.) The project shall comply with the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion, and sediments during construction. 23.) There are no single-family residences or septic systems in the project area; therefore, a review of the proposal by Jefferson County Environmental Health is not required. SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I ONAI ION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE12-00018 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ M Application Received: 7/26/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/10/2012 Case Finaled: REMOVAL OF A POKI ION OF WATER LINE, RE-CONSTRUC!ION IN NEW ALIGNMENT, RELOACTION OF OLYMPIC DISCOVERY TRAIL SECTION & RESTORATION OF MAYNARD SHORELINE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP93-00281 GARRISON F Application Received: 7/9/1993 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/20/1993 Case Finaled: 12/28/1993 Rail Road Cars @ Disco Bay 1.) Domestic strength sewage only into septic system, and the amount of waste water is limited to 500 gallons per day. Samples are to be taken on a quarterly basis for BOD and Suspended Solids (SS), the results are to be submitted the Health Department. 2.) A system for monitoring wastewater volumes is required. 3.) Maintain a minimum of 100 feet setback from the pond, Discovery Bay and existing well with the drainfield areas. 4.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components, note run times. 5.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 6.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 7.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent 8.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. jG 1T1 9.) Divert all sources of drainage away from septic tank and drainfield area. 10.) PUD monitoring contract is required 11.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given. n.-.,,9ge of \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 5 of 5 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902242005 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner BLD07-00596 MLA07-00643 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ I F Application Received: 12/7/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/7/2008 Case Finaled: 11/23/2009 SEPA REVIEW AND UEMULI[-ION PERMIT: The project consists of complete removal of two derelict sawmills in Discovery Bay(aka: Port Discovery)including the removal of the buildings, pilings and machinery. The property is owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the tidelands on the property are owned by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. One building lies east of the railroad grade. The other building lies west of the railroad grade. Portions have collapsed into the tidal waters of the lagoon. I� v Asbestos from the buildings was removed in 2003. Asbestos Removal and Disposal Report, Phase I - Enviro . Site Assessment and Phase II -Site Assessment were submitted with the application State and local agencies such as the Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Washington Dept. of Fish &MIdl f e of22 Washington Dept. of Natural Resources and Army Corps. Of Engineers will be notified and have an opportunity to comment on the proposal. 1.) The applicant proposes to remove a structure(s) that may contain treated wood. Please refer to Ecology's publication "Focus on Treated Wood Exclusion", available at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0304038.pdf for suggested best management practices and disposal requirements for treated wood. For additional information or clarification, please contact Dee Williams with Ecology's Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction program, at(360)407-6348. 2.) Property owners, developers, and contractors are encouraged to recycle all possible leftover construction, demolition, and land clearing (CDL) materials and reduce waste generated. Recycling construction debris is often less expensive than landfill disposal. Please call Ecology's 1-900-RECYCLE hotline for facilities in the area that will accept your CDL materials for reuse or recycling. 3.) 3. Remove and properly dispose of any treated timbers at a permitted facility. If contamination is currently known or observed during construction, sampling of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of the soil is readily visible, or is revealed by sampling, Ecology must be notified. Contact the environmental report tracking system coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office at(360)407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required, contact Chuck Cline (360)407-6267. 4.) Permit approval is based on ALL waste being disposed of at an appropriate permitted facility 5.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on (date)for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban Shoreline Designation, Stable Shoreline Slope Stability, Type 3 stream, Type 5 Stream, Habitat for Trumpeter Swans, Water Fowl Concentrations and Shorebirds, wetlands mapped along the shoreline, Seismic Hazard Area, Frequently Flooded Area, High Risk and Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone(SIPZ). 6.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 7.) A Type 3 and Type 5 Streams (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) have been identified on the subject property. The streams will require a setback of 100-feet and 50-feet respectively. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 8.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 9.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 10.) The proposal does not include groundwater withdraw!. If potable water is required in the future the applicant shall meet all of the Aquifer Recharge and SIPZ conditions. 11.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 4 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 12.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 3 and Type 5 Streams), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 100-feet and 50-feet respectively. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). 13.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 14.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during demolition activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 15.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 16.) The proposal will not create impervious surface and minimal land disturbing activity is expected. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require your proposal comply with Minimum Requirement#2 (Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention) of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 17.) The project shall comply with Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Elements#1 through#12 of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 18.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 19.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 20.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) issued on February 6, 2008. 21.) The site plan as submitted with the demolition permit application on December 6, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated February 6, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 22.) This approval is for the demolition of two derelict buildings (sawmills) only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 23.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 24.) The project is located in an area with a"suburban"shoreline designation. Since the project is for the complete removal of two structures it does not meet the definition of development under the Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC). No shoreline permit or shoreline permit exemption is required. SDP09-00037 MLA09-00152 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ I A Application Received: 5/6/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/23/2009 Case Finaled: Fish Enhancement Project-former Veneer Mill site at Discovery Bay 1.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 2.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. JG E,, I (t___ "7 -:.e _...... \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 2 of 4 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 3.) The project will remove hydrocarbon laden soils, concrete footings, and oil soaked wooden bulkhead from the nearshore and replace them with clean marine sediment. Initial estimates indicate up to 230 cubic yards of soils will need to be removed and hauled to Waste Management Olympic View Transfer Station in Bremerton. 80 tons of concrete footings will be hauled to an approved dump site. The project is follow up to DNR's removal of the failed building structure in 2008. Project work will take place completely in the dry, though some work may take place below MHHW during a single low tide. Work will be staged so that the bulk of fill and concrete footing removal will take place above MHHW first. Then during a single low tide, excavator will remove the oil soaked wooden bulkhead, and any contaminated soils below MHHW. Initial soil investigations indicate excavations will not need to go much beyond MHHW. Clean sediments will be used to fill any excavations below MHHW and be contoured to meet the existing grade outside of the contaminated soils footprint. Silt fencing will be placed surrounding the work area to minimize impacts outside of the work zone. Native plants to be used to revegetate. 4.) The proposal qualifies as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project and is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290, which states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. 5.) This approval is for a shoreline exemption for a Streamline Fish Habitat Enhancement Project only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 6.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program JCC 18.25.090 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 7.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 8.) RCW 77.55.290(4)states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act area consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish and Wildlife Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County. 9.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 10.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 3 of 4 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 11.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISHI P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY REST ORATION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE12-00018 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISHI M Application Received: 7/26/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/10/2012 Case Finaled: REMOVAL OF A POk I ION 01- WATER LINE, RE-CONSTRUC I ION IN NEW ALIGNMENT, RELOACTION OF OLYMPIC DISCOVERY TRAIL SECTION & RESTORATION OF MAYNARD SHORELINE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. G 4 \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 4 of 4 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR ITyy Parcel 902243048 Printed: July 30, 2013 .:_w<w� 'e Cases Name Review Type S a f ui s-- er- BLD01-00567 MLA01-00486 CALERO I F M FARFAN Application Received: 10/9/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/31/2001 Case Finaled: 10/29/2002 ADU 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 5, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: SUSC aquifer recharge area, seismic, suburban shoreline designation. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 6.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, and within 500 feet of any marine shoreline shall be requires to infiltrate all stormwater runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, onsite. 7.) A Small Parcel Erosion Control &Sediment Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 9.) The site plan as submitted with the ADU building application on October 9, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 18, 2001 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for an ADU only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 12.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the 30 foot buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 13.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 14.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area shall maintain a vegetative buffer serback fo 30 feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the ADU and single family residence and any future development. 15.) The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. 16.) Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 25%. 17.) Minimum setback from Fairmount Road (a county local access road C503209) shall be 20 feet. Minimum side setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM) shall be 30 feet. 18.) There shall be a minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces associated with the ADU. 19.) The septic system (SEP01-0125) is designed for a total of four bedrooms. The proposed ADU will utilize an equivalent to two bedrooms based on WAC 246-272-115012c. When proposed, the single family residence shall be no larger than a two bedroom or redesign of the septic system may be required. 20.) The proposal shall infiltrate stormwater entirely on site. If the property is unable to infiltrate, a geotechnical report shall be submitted and a shoreline and HPA permit may be required. 21.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural conditions, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 3 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I ORAI ION PROJECT --1/4)G II No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR99-00123 GARRISON - F - S Application Received: 4/8/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/16/1999 Case Finaled: New alternative septic-En. sys em. 1.) The application was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center staff on 8-11-99 for the potential presence of critical areas regulated under the provisions of the Ordinance, and the following critical areas were confirmed as potentially present on the subject property: shoreline (conservancy and suburban), wetlands along the shoreline, seismic hazard, flooding along shoreline, susceptible aquifer recharge area. 2.) Acting upon the above information, Jefferson County staff conducted a site inspection of the subject property on 8-11-99 and confirmed the existence of the following critical areas and/or their associated buffers on the property: shoreine, aquifer recharge area, flooding along shoreline, wetlands along shoreline. 3.) Aquifer recharge areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geologic formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible aquifer recharge areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. This includes any portion of Jefferson County with a DRASTIC index of greater than or equal to 180 points as determined using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency DRASTIC methodology: Drastic: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Using Hydrogeologic Settings (EPA 600/23-87-035). 5.) The potential for an earthquake of a high magnitude occurring in western Washington in the near future is considered a high probability by regional experts. 6.) This waiver also includes findings and conditions for evaluation of shoreline areas as regulated under the provision of The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, adopted March 7, 1988, as amended. 7.) The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be 30 feet, or 1 foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank height exceeds 10 feet. 8.) Proposed development activities are located outside of the flood hazard area. 9.) A setback of 75 feet, measured perpendicularly from the wetland edge, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. Should the applicant wish to use buffer averaging to locate a single family residence on the parcel, the total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging shall not be less than that contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging. Buffer averaging would allow for a 37.5 foot setback from the edge of the wetland to proposed construction activities. This setback shall be determined upon review of building permit application materials. 10.) No alteration shall be made to the wetland or its buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area Administrator. Buffer enhancement is allowed as long as native species are selected for planting. 11.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the wetland buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Wetland and Buffer-Do not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." 12.) The applicant shall permanently separate the upland boundary of the wetland buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing and maintaining one of the following; logs, trees, a hedge row, or other prominent physical marking. The separation method identified by the applicant shall be approved by the Critical Area Administrator prior to planting or installation. 13.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated wetland, or its associated buffer. 14.) Among the native conifer species which may be used are: grand fir(Aibes grandis), sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), shore pine (Pinus contorta), Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), western redcedar(Thuja plicata), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). 15.) Among the native tree species which may be used are: vine maple (Acer circinatum) big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), quaking aspen (populus tremula), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), bitter cherry(Prunus emarginata), Oregon white oak(Quercus garryana), cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), Pacific willow(Salix lasiandra), Scouler's willow(Salix scouleriana). 16.) Among the native shrub species which may be used are: service-berry(Amalanchier alnifolia), red osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) salal (Gaultheria shallon), ocean spray(Holodiscus discolor), Indian plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitus), red flowering currant(Ribes sanguineum), wild rose (Rosa gymnocarpa), Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), swamp rose (Rosa pisocarpa), willows(Salix ssp.), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus), evergreen huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), red huckleberry(Vaccinium parvifolium). \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 2 of 3 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 17.) The applicant shall develop and submit to the Permit Center for approval, a"Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan" (see enclosures). Once the subject permit has been issued, the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted "Small Parcel Erosion Control Plan." A sediment barrier shall be required to be installed at the edge of the wetland buffer to prevent sediment from entering this critical habitat area. USR99-00091 GARRISON F Application Received: 11/10/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/18/2001 Case Finaled: 10/18/2001 .....jfrEz., No findings, conditions, or permissions found. G( \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 3 of 3 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902243044 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner XMP88-00066 ZERR A Application Received: 11/9/1988 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/21/1988 Case Finaled: PROPOSAL: The project is to construct a berm shore defense work in common with a single family residence adjacent to Snow Creek between Highway 20 and the abandoned railroad right-of-way at the head of Disc�er9��yTE�d The project is intended to eliminate livestock watering and intrusion into Snow Creek. Willow cuttingsuill be planted and a fence will be built. Rock rip-rap will be placed to protect the stream bank from erosion. Watelir� • constructed and watering sites created for the livestock in pasture adjacent to Snow Creek. e of No findings, conditions, or permissions found. XMP95-00051 ZERR A Application Received: 8/23/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/27/1996 Case Finaled: Remove accumulated sediment &gravel from the channel of Snow Creek. From 200 ft. upstream from the SR101 bridge to a point approx. 900 ft. downstream from the SR20 bridge (approx. 1200 ft.) the channel will be excavated to a depth of no more than six vertical feet below present streambed elevation. Habitat pools will be excavated to a depth of approximately 3 ft. below adjacent streambed elevation. Tracked excavator will be used operating from the bank. Between the SR 101 bridge upstream to the WDF&W Research Station weir (approx. 2000 ft) existing pools may be excavated to a maximum depth of 6 ft. &existing riffle areas to a maximum depth of 3 ft. below present elevation. Additional habitat pools may be excavated to create additional habitat, depending on WDFW recommendations. Large woody debris(LWD)to provide fish habitat will be placed and securely anchored in all existing pools where excavation occurs and in all newly created pools upstream of SR 101. LWD placement will occur at a rate of at least two rootwads and one log per pool. All LWD will be coniferous material in sound, rot free condition. Revegetation of stream- banks will occur where necessary. Conifers will be used as much as possible. The operation of the WDF&W weir will be altered to catch additional sediment/gravel, to control the streambed aggradation in the project area. This material will be removed as needed. Existing bypass structures may be modified to accommodate greater flow for water quality protection. In stream activities will occur between June 15 and September 15 to minimize impacts on salmon & steelhead. All work shall be subject to the conditions of Wash. Dept. of Fish &Wildlife (WDFW) in the required Hydraulic Project Approval where details on LWD size/placement& pool locations will be specified. 1.) The proposal is consistent with HB5155 and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. The proposal is not a substantial development. 2.) A Hydraulic Project Approval was issued August 18, 1995 under Control Number 00-A1590-02. The HPA expires on April 15, 2000. 3.) This approval pertains to Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program requirements only. The approval of any other agency with jurisdiction or any other required permits shall be obtained prior to undertaking the project. 4.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Program other than described above shall receive separate review and approval from this office. 5.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 6.) Prior to commencing construction, proponent should contact the Washington State Department of Fisheries at 895-4757 to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulics Code. 7.) The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Permit Center, Development Review Division 48 hours in advance prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure conformance with project conditions. 8.) The proponent shall comply with the provisions set forth in the Hydraulic permit No. 00-A1590-02. XMP96-00058 ZERR A Application Received: 8/23/1996 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/2/1996 Case Finaled: Remove accumulated sediment &gravel from the channel of Snow Creek. From 200 ft. upstream from the SR101 bridge to a point approx. 900 ft. downstream from the SR20 bridge (approx. 1200 ft.)the channel will be excavated to a depth of no more than six vertical feet below present streambed elevation. Habitat pools will be excavated to a depth of approximately 3 ft. below adjacent streambed elevation. Tracked excavator will be used operating from the bank. Between the SR 101 bridge upstream to the WDF&W Research Station weir (approx. 2000 ft) existing pools may be excavated to a maximum depth of 6 ft. &existing riffle areas to a maximum depth of 3 ft. below present elevation. Additional habitat pools may be excavated to create additional habitat, depending on WDFW recommendations. Large woody debris(LWD)to provide fish habitat will be placed and securely anchored in all existing pools where excavation occurs and in all newly created pools upstream of SR 101. LWD placement will occur at a rate of at least two rootwads and one log per pool. All LWD will be coniferous material in sound, rot free condition. Revegetation of stream-banks will occur where necessary. Conifers will be used as much as possible. The operation of the WDF&W weir will be altered to catch additional sediment/gravel, to control the streambed aggradation in the project area. This material will be removed as needed. Existing bypass structures may be modified to accommodate greater flow for water quality protection. In stream activities will occur between June 15 and September 15 to minimize impacts on salmon & steelhead. All work including LWD size/placement& pool locations shall be subject to the conditions of Wash. Dept. of Fish &Wildlife (WDFW) in the required HPA. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 2 Cases Name Review Tvpe Status Planner 1.) The proposal is consistent with HB5155 and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. The proposal is not a substantial development. 2.) A Hydraulic Project Approval was issued August 18, 1995 under Control Number 00-A1590-02. The HPA expires on April 15, 1997. 3.) This approval pertains to Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program requirements only. The approval of any other agency with jurisdiction or any other required permits shall be obtained prior to undertaking the project. 4.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Program other than described above shall receive separate review and approval from this office. 5.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 6.) Prior to commencing construction, proponent should contact the Washington State Department of Fisheries at 895-4757 to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulics Code. 7.) The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Permit Center, Development Review Division 48 hours in advance prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure conformance with project conditions. 8.) The proponent shall comply with the provisions set forth in the Hydraulic permit No. 00-A1590-02. COM13-00097 JEFFERSON LAND TRUST P Application Received: 4/30/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SEPTIC No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP07-00093 MLA07-00134 PFLUEGER I D Application Received: 3/13/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Denied. Unable to issue due to lack of information and inability to make application to build a large retaining wall. MOATEL DF EASEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY 1.) A building permit is required to install the manufactured home that is currently stored on this property. 2.) The proposed septic system is outside of shoreline jurisdiction. SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I OKAI ION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. --k.)94TE ar. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 2 of 2 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902243044 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SEP07-00093 MLA07-00134 PFLUEGER I D Application Received: 3/13/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Denied. Unable to issue due to lack of information and inability to make application to build a large retaining wall. MOATEL DF EASEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY 1.) A building permit is required to install the manufactured home that is currently stored on this property. 2.) The proposed septic system is outside of shoreline jurisdiction. SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I URA/ION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. -OG E ,fie of� - \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 1 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902243048 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SEP99-00086 MLA01-00242 GARRISON I C M FARFAN Application Received: 4/8/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/27/1999 Case Finaled: NOW FILES WITH SEP 01-125 an expansion to the redesign. 1.) The fill specifications for this design have a P.E. stamp. The adequacy of this portion of the design rests on this fact. The fill shall be specifically certified, inspected and approved by the engineer on the as-built. 2.) The reserve drainfield also requires the placement of large quantities of fill. Commpliance with the current state and county regulations will apply at that time. 3.) The elevated sand lined bed must have the 30 mil pvc linner 6inches below grade as designed. 4.) All culvert or tight lines of drainages must be 30 or more feet away from the primary or reserve drainfields when down slope 5.) Performance monitoring schedule for treatment systems followed by reduced sized drainfield/infiltrative area shall be :1) Two times per year(once every six months)during the first and second year following installation. 2) One time per year beginning with the third year following installation. 3) In response to complaints or problem .Q a ljon ports to the bottom of the trench are to be installed in at least two places on each drainfield line: One' hpf the beginning of each line and one within 10 feet of the end of each line. 6.) 50 ft. setback from any 1:1 bank to be maintained. 7.) Dry season installation recommended. ';ge of --, 8.) MAXIMUM BED DEPTH 12 INCHES 9.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 10.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 11.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 12.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given. 13.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 14.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent 15.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 16.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 17.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the inlet and outlet of the septic tank. Minimum 24" riser over inlet. BLD01-00567 MLA01-00486 CALERO I F M FARFAN Application Received: 10/9/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/31/2001 Case Finaled: 10/29/2002 ADU 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 5, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: SUSC aquifer recharge area, seismic, suburban shoreline designation. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 6.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, and within 500 feet of any marine shoreline shall be requires to infiltrate all stormwater runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, onsite. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 7.) A Small Parcel Erosion Control &Sediment Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 9.) The site plan as submitted with the ADU building application on October 9, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 18, 2001 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for an ADU only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 12.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the 30 foot buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 13.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparat�i°t rials. 14.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area shall maintain a vegetative buffer serback fo 30 feet;—u � shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the ADU and singfamily resi ence and any future development. 15.) The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. b 16.) Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 25%. 17.) Minimum setback from Fairmount Road (a county local access road C503209) shall be 20 feet. Minimum side setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)shall be 30 feet. 18.) There shall be a minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces associated with the ADU. 19.) The septic system (SEP01-0125) is designed fora total of four bedrooms. The proposed ADU will utilize an equivalent to two bedrooms based on WAC 246-272-115012c. When proposed, the single family residence shall be no larger than a two bedroom or redesign of the septic system may be required. 20.) The proposal shall infiltrate stormwater entirely on site. If the property is unable to infiltrate, a geotechnical report shall be submitted and a shoreline and HPA permit may be required. 21.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural conditions, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. RAP01-00204 MLA01-00486 GARRISON I F M FARFAN Application Received: 9/17/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/31/2001 Case Finaled: 10/21/2002 ROAD APPROACH AND ADDRESS- Fairmount Rd 1.) The applicant may install private road approach to Fairmount Rd. at mile post 0.17 left. 2.) An approach culvert is not necessary at this location at this time; however, if drainage becomes a problem here in the future the county reserves the right to require one. 3.) The applicant must place a minimum of 2 inches of crushed surfacing to the right-of-way line. 4.) The grade of the approach shall be such that all surface water shall be directed into a ditch line and not onto the county road. ZON01-00059 MLA01-00486 GARRISON I F M FARFAN Application Received: 9/17/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/22/2001 Case Finaled: 7/5/2007 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 5, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: SUSC aquifer recharge area, seismic, suburban shoreline designation. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. \\tidemark\data\forms\R MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 2 of 5 Cases Name Review Tvne Status Planner 5.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 6.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, and within 500 feet of any marine shoreline shall be requires to infiltrate all stormwater runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, onsite. 7.) The applicant is proposing to construct a single family residence and install a septic system. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal adhere to the Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual. Said manual creates thresholds to mitigate sediment and erosion. The project will be required to meet all stormwater regulations upon submittal of the building permit, or if the applicant is proposing clearing or grading on the property. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 9.) The site plan as submitted with the SPAAD application on September 17, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 19, 2001 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) If development is proposed to be located within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water mark (OHWM), t' subject to the provisions of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master program. .,�� I� ti 11.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive LarUse Map effective C! August 28, 1998. 12.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified DeveIo p a Code (Sean 8.7 The criteria for approval is as follows: 737- 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff comment -The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment -The proposal was reviewed by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department to assure an adequate septic system can be established. The Health Department reviewed the proposal and has approved a 4 bedroom septic system on July 24, 200. In addition, the applicant has applied for a road approach from Fairmount Road and an address. The address is 173 Fairmount Road. Upon submittal of a building permit, the applicant shall prove that an adequate source of potable water is available to serve the proposal. A stormwater plan must be filed at the time of application, or prior to beginning any clearing or grading of the property. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provision contained within Section 8 of this code and Chapter 43.21C RCW. Staff comment -The proposed single family residence is EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four(4) dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment -The proposal has been reviewed and is consistent with all applicable federal, state, and local ordinances and codes. The proposal will not affect the public health, safety and general welfare. 13.) The proposal shall infiltrate stormwater entirely onsite. If the property is unable to infiltrate, a geotechnical report shall be submitted and a shoreline and HPA permit may be required. 14.) Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. 15.) Total impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25% of the lot. Impervious surface includes driveways, rooftops, decks, concrete, etc. 16.) Minimum setback from Fairmount Road (a county local access road, C503209) shall be 20 feet. Minimum side setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) shall be 30 feet. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 3 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 17.) The proposal shall designate four(4)on-site parking spaces (2 spaces for the single family residence and 2 spaces for the ADU). 18.) Duration of Approval -Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the site plan shall be effective for five (5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five year period the site plan approval advance determination cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. THE COUNTY WILL NOT PROVIDE NOTIFICATION PRIOR TO EXPIRATION. Limitations of Approval-approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic system, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the site plan approval advance determination and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not consitiute authority to wells, stormwater management, or building permits, etc.). Modifications to an approved site plan may be requested by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications. 19.) The septic system (SEP99-0086) is designed for a total of four bedrooms. The proposed ADU will utilize an equivalent to two bedrooms. When proposed, the single family residence shall be no larger than a two bedroom or redesign of the septic mayl be required. 20.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.5, which exempts the "construction by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence[in shoreline jurisdiction]for the owner's or owner's family's use..."from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements under certain provisions. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 21.) Setbacks for accessory developments shall be as specified under Shoreline Master Program Section 4.105 Urban, Section 5.50 Commercial Development, and Section 5.160 Residential Development. 22.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 30-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the ADU and single family residence and any future development. 23.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 11 SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P—1/4)G 1� . Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: _..._ DISCOVERY BAY RES I ORATION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ---- BLD04-00099 CALERO I F Application Received: 2/13/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/27/2004 Case Finaled: 2/24/2006 REMODEL OF EXIST ING NES - NO MLA REQ No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP01-00125 GARRISON F Application Received: 7/17/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/24/2001 Case Finaled: 10/28/2002 was SEP99-86 1.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 2.) The reserve area may require large amounts of fill to be placed on the property.e Y Compliance with current regulations ons will be required 3.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 4.) Performance monitoring schedule for treatment systems followed by reduced sized drainfield/infiltrative area shall be :1) Two times per year(once every six months) during the first and second year following installation. 2) One time per year beginning with the third year following installation. 3) In response to complaints or problems. Observation ports to the bottom of the trench are to be installed in at least two places on each drainfield line: One within 10 feet of the end of each line. 5.) Health Dept. required to observe the rim prior to cover and pressure test when system fully installed/complete, 48 hours notice to be provided for scheduling. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 4 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 6.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 7.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 8.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 9.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 10.) The portion of transport line under the driven way is to be cased or equivalent 11.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 12.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the inlet and outlet of the septic tank. Minimum 24" riser over inlet. 13.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 14.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. SOM01-00125 CALERO RCR Application Received: 10/28/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/16/2011 Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. .JG ITE 2ge of?„? \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 5 of 5 CASES, FINDING,CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 902242005 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I ORATION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE12-00018 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ M Application Received: 7/26/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/10/2012 Case Finaled: REMOVAL OF A POR I ION OF WATER LINE, RE-CONSTRUC I ION IN NEW ALIGNMENT, RELOACTION OF OLYMPIC DISCOVERY TRAIL SECTION & RESTORATION OF MAYNARD SHORELINE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ITE EW :le:477r \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 1 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 000000220 Printed: July 30, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner COM99-00008 LEE F Application Received: 3/16/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 5/4/1999 Billboard on HWY 101 Just past Discovery Bay neighborhood center advertising"Ramada Inn in Sequim". No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ZON99-00011 LEE C M GREWELL Application Received: 4/14/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ZON99-00019 LEE C M GREWELL Application Received: 6/10/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Off-site 3'x 4' sign. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SDP13-00033 MLA13-00088 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ P Application Received: 7/1/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DISCOVERY BAY RES I ORATION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE01-00008 GARRISON C Application Received: 2/9/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/23/2001 Case Finaled: Temporary craft tents to sell crafts by local vendors. No food items will be sold. Initially, there will be six 10'x 20'tents. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE12-00018 STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/ M Application Received: 7/26/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/10/2012 Case Finaled: REMOVAL OF A POk I ION OF WATER LINE, RE-CONSTRUC I ION IN NEW ALIGNMENT, RELOACTION OF OLYMPIC DISCOVERY TRAIL SECTION & RESTORATION OF MAYNARD SHORELINE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. 44e Ofd \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 7/30/2013 Page 1 of 1 D -1 % * -b 0) cA -I -b x -1 -I CD 0) -- -• 0) -0 Cl) 0) x C- c7 r+ X 0) C) 7 "O 0) 0 - -O '5 -s n 01 C 0- CD 0) C) CD = CO CC -- CD CC CD CD -1 CD r+ O CD - 7 7C D -S E -s -- CD -1 0 7 # CC -P - CD C7 CJl CO CPI -5 0- O O co CO - O O N O CPI CO CO O -1 O D N -1 N - N CJl O O) O C CO O CPI O r+ - 0) CO O O) MI CO C) �. r+ -1 -1 CO C7 I- o rn -1 o -0 C a r IV CD -( o a a = 0) u) -1 -P o 3 r -I -D co rn -I v C7 rn r CD co D -1 C7 >o I-I D m fli -1 O DC IV C . m C) D -0 CO O --I TI CD D I-I -1 TI rn C N r 0 - 1 D Cl) X ^ X) CO O -1 X 3> -1 D r N O 0) X r ni D 0 D CA CO X PO z7 D CO 0 -I = N O M co = Z) rn I-I CO -P 'O rn D rn I-I M Z M N rn D CD -C Z CO C) O 7J 0_ CO C 07 CI) -I - CPI -I CJl Z I-I -1 O O -• � X o (7 O M Z - CPI -- - m Z I-4 o = D I CO Z I MI D Q - I 0 C7 r 11 '� CO O O O TI O \ 01 H X --I E -J I-I I-I X C O a) m D) C co C. = R° = n o C M -I M Ca co v r v CD CD r- 1-- -n C 71 CO 1 0 o -1 -1 M v D r o Z. C 0 C7 Z '/ a C� n o- D -.I C7 = = = C D CO CO H CL r+ Z v o m -I c v Rc.`' c) D CO r+ t j R `fy C. MI 3 sz r 0 0 D (p y°Cn a O _('� z cn -P - m N CO ® O H O T Z o i� e c O 1-1 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:902231004 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 985011076 Ste Address: Section: 23 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: NE1/4 Fire Dist: Gardiner(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S23 T29 R2W I GOV LOTS 1 & 2(E OF SR 101) I LESS TAX 4 & 26 LS PTN GOV LOT 1 I BTWN SR 101 & RR R/W(RR R/W INCL) I LESS TAX 34 AND 35 x No Photo Available IL— http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=902231004... 7/30/2013 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:902242005 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 985011076 Ste Address: Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Gardiner(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) .J`7 ITE Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND r.: Property Description: S24 T29 R2W I TL TAX V(LS SR 101 R/W &TL V-1) x No Photo Available htt ://www.co.'efferson.wa.us/assessors/ arcel/ arcel rint.as ?PARCEL NO=902242005... 7/30/2013 P J P p P P _ Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:902243046 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 985011076 Site Address: Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: SW 1/4 Fire Dist: Gardiner(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 ITe Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Y) Sub Division: r Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND ° a.� e 7 of Property Description: S24 T29 R2W I TAX 83 x No Photo Available http://www.co.j efferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=902243046... 7/30/2013 Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 Je Count,�K'tSL� ,,, , ,_ - z ..b Home :. County Info '...Departments : Search Parcel Number: 902243044 SEARCH Parcel Number: 902243044 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: JEFFERSON LAND TRUST 1033 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND WA983686523 Site Address: .o�G !T °" Vieof Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend (50) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Gardiner (5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Exempt Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 Planning area: Discovery Bay (5) Sub Division: Assessor's Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S24 T29 R2W I TAX 68(ENLG BY TX 76) I SUBJ TO EASE I SUBJ TO REST COVT #521386 I Click on photo for larger image. X? No X No 2nd Photo Photo Available Available No Assessor Permit Data Plats Map Parcel lats&Surveys Septic Monitoring Info Available Tax,A/V, Sales Info '' Jefferson County HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH _' Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel_NO=902243044 7/30/2013 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:902243020 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: JEFFERSON LAND TRUST 1033 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 983686523 Site Address: Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: SW 1/4 Fire Dist: Gardiner-(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Exempt Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Sub Division: --„UG II Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S24 T29 R2W I TAX 52 I SUBJ/REST COVT #521386 x No Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=902243020... 7/30/2013 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number 902243048 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: CHRISTOPHER CALERO SUSAN CALERO 173 FAIRMOUNT RD PORT TOWNSEND WA 983689745 Site Address: 173 FAIRMOUNT RD PORT TOWNSEND 98368 Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend(50) , '-r Qtr Section: SW 1/4 Are Dist: Gardiner(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable -)1� Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 e of Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S24 T29 R2W I TAX 82 '4 ! ate- 4-ks 4■ 4t4?44 i 2 _ a, - �r http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=902243048... 7/30/2013 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number 964516003 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 985011076 Site Address: Section: 24 School District: Port Townsend(50) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Garrliner(5) -�V °tiY Township: 29N Tax Status: State Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 e; -� Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) G, Sub Division: JUNCTION CITY Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: JUNCTION CITY 1 BLK 160 LOT 7 1 1 1 x No Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=964516003... 7/30/2013 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:964516903 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: STATE OF WASHINGTON-FISH/WDLF REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 600 CAPITOL WAY N ;..vV G OLYMPIA WA 985011076 Site Address: `- ge of Section: 24 School District: PortTownsend(50) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Garcliner(5) Township: 29N Tax Status: State Range: 2W Tax Code: 151 Planning area: Discovery Bay(5) Sub Division: JUNCTION CITY Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND MIN A/V CONSOLIDATION 7/97 Property Description: JUNCTION CITY I BLK 169 LOTS 11 & 12(S OF R/W), I BLK 170 LOTS 1 THRU 10 I BLK 179 LOT 12 x No Photo Available http://www.co.j efferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=964516903... 7/30/2013 Mary Blain From: Kevin Long [projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:32 PM To: Mary Blain Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Thes;,arr the parcels involved\in the project: 902224005, 96451 6003, 90223004, 964516903, 902243046 90224044, 9022%3033, 902243020, 9022�430'48. It appears to answer your questions AND add one parcel that was not included for some reason. I just left you a way too long message re: the building projects to help you find them in the Waterline Plan Set. These elements are only to 50% design so there is not a lot of information there. Please inform me if this is an appropriate level to submit for building permits or if we need to hold off on the building permit until we have further design accomplished. I do not want to waste anyones time or our money! I will be on vacation next week. But if you want to call me today or tomorrow call my cell at 301-9251. I am also happy to stop through your office at your convenience. Thank you, �-` )G ITE Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Mary Blain [mailto:mblain @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:10 PM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Kevin, I was looking over some of the paper work, looking for plans and I noticed that I don't'think I have the correct/or all of the parcel numbers involved in the case. The numbers were very hard to read on the Master Application. I have: 964516003 902231004 964516903 902243046 902243044 (which was entered twice on the Master Application, maybe another number by mistake?) 902243020 902243048 There seems to be another parcel that is missing a number.9022X4055,which I need completed. I want to make sure I'm entering all the information correctly. 1 Also, in regards to the building permit, I'm looking through your paper work now, looking for the structural calculations of the proposed building projects and site plans of the each project. I haven't found anything yet, but as you well know, it's a pretty lengthy stack of paper so it may take few a bit to find what I need. In the meantime, if there is anything I can help with, please don't hesitate to ask. Thanks! Mary Blain Permit Technician ITE '`� _ Dept of Community Development '7 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4452 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain ftco.iefferson.wa.us All email to or from this email address may be subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. From: Kevin Long[mailto:projectmanaaer @nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 2:59 PM To: Mary Blain Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Mary, Yes, all the "walls" in the cost estimate list are over four feet. I question whether the reinforced slopes are considered walls,that is a determination for your folks to make. No need for a permit estimate until you iron out the details. Thanks, Kevin From: Mary Blain [mailto:mblain @co.jefferson.wa.usl Sent:Tuesday, July 02, 2013 2:55 PM To: Kevin Long Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Kevin, I had forwarded your inquiry so I am checking in to see if someone had gotten back with you. According to Donna, if retaining wall is above 4 feet tall and holding back a surcharge, a building permit is necessary. So my next question is: 2 Are all three Trail walls over 4 feet tall? And I'm not sure if you will need a building permit for the waterline vaults. I've been trying to track our Plan Check guy down all day to get his opinion. The general consensus here is no, but I want to double check so I don't give out the wrong info. I want to double check on a few things before I give you a firm permit total, but I'm happy to give you a rough estimate of the "Trail"totals. Let me know what you'd like to do. Thanks! 4 G IT Mary Blain -- Permit Technician c . "`, of Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4452 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain @co.iefferson.wa.us All email to or from this email address maybe subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orq] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11:27 AM To: Mary Blain; Jodi Adams Subject: NOSC building permit application fee Hi Mary,Jodi, I have some cost estimates of the structures that would be built as part of the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project. It is not clear to me if reinforced slopes are structures that are permitted through your building department. I have included them below if this is the case. Estimated Construction Costs: Trail: Soldier Pile Wall=$70,000 Trail: Rock Wall over 4 feet= $84,000 Trail: Reinforced Slope= $144,000 Waterline Vaults, 2 each @ $9,000=$18,000 I understand the building permit fee is for review by your building permit technicians/engineers.The design set I provided with the application show trail items listed above are designed to the 50% level and waterline elements at 90% design. 3 Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition —j _r"_. :. proiectmanager@nosc.org °' (360)379-8051 G.-9e f 4 502 \3 , o �3 (.--...0-24‘.- JEFFERSON COUNTY f..,.t.t :p €T DEPARTMENT OF COMMt qTY DEVELOPMEhi NT a` , 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•WashrngtDn 98368 -- 360/379-4450• 360/379-4451 Fax •' _%. www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment °-°— �- Z Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): 4 O 7 2(l7 S Discover Bo. fZeS+t . ton Pro'tc, Tax Parcel Number. : 005 a.41 r. .• -0,2 0, Property Size: r°1-41'6 at r S (acres/square feet) •0 -D y 3 ' ' :-Adl a • or aireon � ,s �ozZ ` 3di '•a243� s r .2413048 Project Siteesier>ds along latter Disco (3eky'Pram Gardiner !Woad Io Tirmaurrt i d. Property Owner(s)of Record: Pritatu: £JaChtaglrt j' a htnen t Crf-ysh f nrl wildlife.,K lc 6uz(as Telephone: 360-'100 -7723 ' Fax emai99Z/Qkc3' dit .Gxl.50/ Mailing Address: , n. a D „a i, ,ki A C: 0 Applicant(Agent(if different from owner): Nor-th Olympic SaIrnon C.nnli.han>K€nn L.on9 Telephone: 34,01,3-7 9-8051 Fax 360-379 -35'S8 email:pri)ecfmanager'cnocc.63 Mailing Address: aoS B w'c( Pattisnn S#nee+.Pori, Nacllnrk" cot') 5$ t What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies • • ❑Building 0 Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance''(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) • ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached 1 Detached 0 Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or Cl" ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D'or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* • ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)' . ❑ Change of Use 0 Boundary Line Adjustment ` ❑ Address. ❑Road Approach 0 Short Plat'" ❑Home Business 0 Cottage Industry ❑Birxfu)g Site Plan" ❑Propane D Long Plat"' ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments" ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration 0 Stormwater Mana nt ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions" ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)" ) Shoreline Management Substantial Development" ❑Temporary Use 0 Shoreline Management Variance 0-Wireless Telecommunication" 0 Comprehensive PIaMJDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium 0 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require•Pr:--Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request • • '*Requires a Pre.Appkcafon Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: A14600w,de Irani/ U$izot __ -IPA, ESA Con Plunk. i, SQC i n !D6 com�lignee Si✓PA Sec-Tian`i(Ol.CZMF�►f?e4rminn{hnr�, DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate / C . i 't.r // .to act as my agent in matters relating to thi appli on for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Ai Date: • ,7 3v 1 By signing this application . ,the owner/agent attests that the Information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true"and correct to the best of his,her or is knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet . may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,Indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all Debilities.judgments,court costa,reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Joffe n County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access ht 4 entry t efferson County and Its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any requi :• -r ins -' ns 1 Staff' and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant inforrr��tss the County in writing at the . time of the application ,,- he we prior _/ /1 Signature: A ■ A Date: 3-30/13 . - The action or actions A.•cantwidt undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species end could lead to a potential"take of"n endangered species as those terms are defined In the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or'ESA.'Jefferson County m ?--no assurences.to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not e E .. Any i .tai,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are In•• p with r e County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable =; • - adh rng to complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaim and ' ns and dates iit below. Signature: 4 4 ///l .� Date: C 30 /, li - rr G:\PcanitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD POWS\Mast¢r Permit Application:5.29.U&doc V 1 'LO V T E BUILDER STATEMENT // The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that' they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ._______/ MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: ' Shoreline: % Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: 0 Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank % ❑ Community System ❑ Afteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Hekr • 0 Individual System ❑ Repair 0 Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition 0 Other. Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: etback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: If tht is isj Commgr'cial Protect you mirrst answer the foilowine: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of&WI Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Curre• Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Prooane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit, rk all items below that apply: 1 Underground Tank 1 Above ground Tank Si - of Propane Tank: 1 Heat Stove 1 Cook Stove I Woodstove 1 Fireplace Inse I Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove 1 Other is this appliance bein4 installed in a Manufactured/Mobi Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank yo must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the pro• e tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. S•uareFoote.e Current Pro•Deed i aY r "7, '.a F,.' .)01,,,,„:::z.-,1,. .,,,s; Main Floor Heated yry�.' ..,'s EH Bid App Review: 4 .i i I., 2 Floor Heated A ._ Consistency Review: , Other Heated '�F'cg- r Base fee: Mezzanine �ig7: Additional Section: Cu 2. S Heated Basement ' , ,`. "1." r."firm' Plan Check fee: S 1.------1)IN' 1 f 0 Unheated Basement _' t State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated A_ w 7 i-: Pot Water Review fee' Garage/Carport - ��,p° � SUBTOTAL AIIIIIIII -144 S Iii? 'S.N Z-:_S ' Decks PACT 911/Rd Approach fee: --. Other '� ^ TOTAL :► 'f:'-' a ,1,;4,4,7; Receipt Number. 1 I 2.` \• �a ,,; ,,, a t Cash/Check Number 2 x-']2_ ESTI ' TED COST(REQUIRED) Date: bt7 Lp® •Fair,arket value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Initials: �h G� • J { G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Pemit Application 5-29-08.doc LOG ITEM _02 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. Page of ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and"property or site" should be read as"proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project 2. Name of applicant:North Olympic Salmon Coalition 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kevin Long North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W Patison St Port Hadlock WA 98368 (360)379-8051 4. Date checklist prepared:6-15-13 5. Agency requesting checklist:Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule{including phasing,if applicable): Waterline construction: Spring/Summer 2014 Shoreline Restoration construction Summer/Fall 2014 Olympic Discovery Trail Construction: Pending funding, the trail can be constructed simultaneously with either of the above components or independently after the above components. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. L C 1rPM Wetland Delineation __ Habitat Management Plan Page 4. of_C Section 7 ESA Compliance 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. JARPA application submitted to DOE,DNR,WDFW,USACOE,Jefferson County Franchise Agreement with WSDOT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. WSDOT-Franchise agreement DOE-CZMA consistency determination,NPDES Construction stormwater permit,401 Water Quality Certification DNR-Aquatic Use Authorization WDFW-Right of entry,HPA USACOE-Nationwide Permit, DAHP-section 106 USFWS-ESA consultation-Section 7 Jefferson County-SEPA determination,critical areas review,utility permit,shoreline substantial development permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline. The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill.These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem processes. Specific elements of the proposed restoration include: 1.Remove armor and restoring a more natural beach profile along an abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. 2.Restore tidal circulation to a currently-enclosed freshwater pond and wetland(Cherry Pond) 3.Remove fill from the mouths of 4 small tributary streams that flow into the project area. 4. Remove a creosoted timber railroad bridge(also called trestle). 5.Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate between the lagoon and the mill pond. (1-5 see Maynard Shoreline Restoration, NOSC, 100%Design Set) 6.Relocate residential waterline that was located within the railroad grade. 7. Construct a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail atop the waterline alignment in the restoration project segment. (6,7 see Waterline Replacement Project,90%Design Set) 2 8.Removal of 1700 feet of Railroad grade and 3 associated railroad trestle bridges between and around to and Creek ..7 9.Removal of sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek p _ (8,9 See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project,NOSC, 100%Design Set) Page <5". 07575 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Discovery Bay,Jefferson County Washington.Located near the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 20 on the West Side of the bay.No street address.In the NW quarter of Section 24,T29N,RO2W.The project site is linear in fashion,refer to the attached site plan(Figure 3)to best understand the project extent.Topography is available on the attached plan sets. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 30% 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY LO C' FrPM c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Page 1 = -� At the restoration sites and at the trail site the soil is fill material that is sandy gravelly in nature. The Highway right of way for much of the length of the waterline is fill which is sandy gravelly borrow. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill material will be used to build a trail prism within the DOT right of way.This would be gravel borrow material from a local pit or the adjacent restoration area with quantities estimated at 5000 CY. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Erosion would be limited to post construction in area where the shoreline has been restored to a more natural state.These sections are designed to"deform"where sediment from one area may transport to another area naturally along the shoreline.There is no infrastructure in these areas of the project and such deformation is a project goal and not detrimental. Erosion is not expected during or post construction on the trail and waterline components of the project.These components have been designed NOT to erode during or after construction as they hold infrastructure intended to be longstanding. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? The Jefferson County Department of Community Development Stormwater Calculation worksheet was used in creating this estimate. Due to the unique nature of this project and project site these calculations are not straightforward, so explanation of methods follows.Site size was determined by adding the size of the parcels on which restoration will take place, and the highway right of ways adjacent to waterline and/or trail developments. Site size is 59.7 acres. Existing impervious surface on the site includes only Highway 101, and is estimated at13.3%.New impervious surface from the project results only from the construction of the trail,and is estimated at.7%. Taken together these result in approximately 14%of the site being covered in impervious surface. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: During construction BMP's will be used to prevent erosion of soils via wind or water. Attached plansets include Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control elements to be installed by the construction contractor. Post project, exposed soil will be seeded 4 - I and strawed with native grasses. Reinforced slopes will be treated with geotextiles during construction and seeded. Slopes adjacent to trails will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Spoils piles at the Maynard Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project sites will be seeded and strawed and planted with native trees and shrubs. Planting plans are included pa _4__ (Figures 4,5,6). '�' a. Air 9 L f a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construct i on a n d when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and exhaust associated with heavy equipment moving earth are expected.These quantities are difficult to quantify. We would expect construction to take approximately 3 months total for all aspects of the project.Given that most of the construction site is adjacent to highway 101 there are already significant emissions in the area and the increase caused by the project will therefore be minimal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: If the site appears to be generating dust,water trucks will be used to stop this. II I ICI 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including LC)'.t i EM year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type# and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. �� a.The restoration sites are bordered by Discovery Bay for their entire length. g of 3 b.Restoration work will take place at the mouth of Snow Creek,Type"S",Salmon Creek Type"F'. c.The trail will be along the shores of Discovery Bay,it crosses 4 small unnamed tributaries that currently enter the bay from adjacent highway culverts.Two of these tributaries feed into the Cherry Pond and are unmapped,though discussions with WDFW suggest the Southern stream is N and the Northern stream is type F.The two mapped tributaries in this area are also designated at Type F. d.A man made pond"Cherry Pond"is adjacent to the trail alignment and will be reconnected to Discovery Bay to become a saltwater wetland.The wetland delineation included with this application classifies the pond as a Category II wetland.After restoration it is expected to become a Category I wetland. e.A second man made pond near Snow Creek the"Snow Creek Estuary Pond"has also been classified as a Category II wetland. It will be unaltered by the project. f.Trail construction is with-in 40 feet of the shores of Discovery Bay. g.Waterline construction is within shoreline buffers at the Northern end of its extent for approximately 1500 feet. The waterline will be directionally bored and cased beneath Snow and Salmon Creeks. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Letters correspond to waterbodies listed in 1)above: a.Restoration work will be adjacent to Discovery Bay.Some work will occur below MHHW on low tide cycles. The work entails bulkhead removal,fill removal,the removal of a creosote railway trestle all to be accomplished with heavy machinery.Details included in Maynard Shoreline Restoration and Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plansets. b.RR trestles will be removed from Salmon and Snow Creeks. c.The project will extend a culvert conveying a stream not designated by the Jefferson County Critical Areas maps. Discussions with WDFW inform us that it is nonfish bearing.Extension of the culvert is necessary to convey the waterline(Waterline Replacement Planset,Sheet W l,callout at 445+00).Another unlisted culvert will be shortened by 50 feet in the Maynard Shoreline Restoration area(Maynard Shoreline Restoration Project Planset Sheet C2.2). Two box culvert sections will be placed over and adjacent to the current outfall of WSDOT Culverts(Waterline Replacement Planset Sheet W2.) d.In the northern restoration area the"Cherry Pond"a manmade Category II wetland will be modified to so that the northern creek feeding it,designated as Type F,will be connected to the shoreline by abandoment of a fish passage barrier culvert and removal of associate fills.This is returns"Cherry Pond"to near historic conditions,and it is expected become a Category I wetland. See Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plans,Sheets C 2.2,C2.3. e.Restoration grading will occur adjacent to the Snow Creek Estuary pond but is not expected to alter the character of the pond.The shores of the pond now covered by invasive species including reed canary grass,Himalayan blackberry,and scotch broom will be cleared,planted and maintained to a establish a native plant buffer. See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Plans,Sheets 3, 10.Planting plan Figure 6. 6 f. A section of the Olympic Discovery trail will be constructed approximately 20-80' from the ordinary high water mark of Discovery Bay.The trail prism will be set on a side slope along the DOT right of way.While much of the prism can be graded to be stable,in places it requires buttressing with a rock walls,reinforced slopes and soldier : ITEM A pile walls. See Waterline and Oly Discovery Trail Plans. g.Waterline construction.Where it follows the trail alignment the waterline causes no impact greater than the trai O f d� alone.At Snow and Salmon Creek the waterline will cross beneath the creeks in directionally drilled,cased crossing.Impacts associated with the creek crossing would be a 10 foot wide construction path used in trenching for waterline hook up to the shaft.No significant streamside vegetation would be impacted by the trenching,mostly grasses and invasive weeds.The construction path would be seeded,strawed and planted with native shrubs prior to back out. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Fill removed from wetlands at Restoration Site:33,827 CY This fill material is RR grade embankments and sidecast spoils deposited on the banks of Snow Creek during past dredging projects. Fill placed in wetland for trail construction: 100 CY(154 Sq ft)This fill would be gravel borrow placed around the culvert extension to allow the trail to fit onto the highway shoulder. ;71 M fc'y'/ar („6 i ry 0 f o 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general (Cv''ed G description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. VU f�(� i The tributary feeding the Cherry Pond(Restoration Plan Sheet C2.2,C2.3)will be set into a pipe and diverted from the pond.With the diversion in place the pond will be allowed to drain before the RR grade impounding the pond is removed/modified. The small tributary feeding into the South end of the Cherry Pond will be diverted when its culvert is extended.As this is a seasonal stream it may be dry during construction in which case no diversion will be required. A small tributary will be removed from the confines of a culvert as part of the shoreline restoration.The stream will be diverted during culvert removal and streambed construction. 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. Nearly the entirety of the restoration elements shown in the Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project plan set and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Planset are mapped as 100 year floodplains.No infrastructure that would be affected by flooding is being installed.The project removes bridges and drinking waterlines from the 100 year floodplain. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. NO. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. NONE. 7 LOG ITEM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Page ) J. of 9-0 C/ AGENCY USE ONL 1- Y c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. During construction stormwater will be infiltrated on site in much the manner it does now,with additional protections offered by TESC measures installed onsite. Post Construction stormwater will infiltrate over most of the project area in the same manner it currently does. The exception would be stormwater that falls on the trail will drain from the trail onto the adjacent slope for infiltration. The trail is being specifically designed to not direct stormwater into concentrated flow paths due to its proximity to the shoreline.Rather,stormwater will leave the downhill side of the trail evenly along its entire length for infiltration on the slope below. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No.TESC measures during construction will prevent silts from entering surface waters.There are no other waste materials expected. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: TESC measures during construction. Slope stabilization,geotextiles,coir logs,erosion control seed,straw,plantings to restore slopes post construction. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:Reviewer,noted in italics below. deciduous tree: alder, willow, cherry evergreen tree: fir Shrubs:rose,snowberry,Himalayan Blackberry,scotch broom, Grass:pasture grasses in uplands,salt grass on estuary surfaces pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: Lyngby Sedge, Pacific Silverweed, Picklweed,Salt Grass, Bull Rush, water plants: other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project removes 656 2-6"alders, 110 6-10"alders,and 9 12-16"alders that are growing on the dredge spoils along the banks of Snow Creek.These trees will be replaced by naturally recruiting salt marsh community that is natural at the site. Approximately 10 acres of rr grade and associated uplands infested with invasive species will be cleared during the restoration.Where subtidal these areas will recruit native saltmarsh vegetation,where upland the areas will be planted in a native shrub/tree community. The Olympic Discovery Trail is being designed to avoid impacting shoreline trees.A few conifers and up to 10 alders may need to be removed to facilitate trail construction.The trail will also remove 18,360 sq/ft of grass in the highway right of way and areas of Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. The waterline project disturbs grasses,Himalayan blackberry and scotchbroom over 2 acres. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 8 page a1 d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: The slope below the trail will be replanted with native grasses and trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Maynard Nearshore Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Upland areas of the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project will be planted with native trees and shrubs. Subtidal areas where grading takes place will not be replanted as salt marsh species surround the site and will quickly recruit to the new ground. The waterline area of impact will be replanted in grasses and strawed. Planting plans are included in Figures 4,5,6. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle,songbirds, wading birds,waterfowl,sea birds mammals: deer, otter, raccoon, rodents fish: salmon, trout, herring, surf smelt, surfperch,sturgeon,sculpin,shellfish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Threatened:Hood Canal Summer Chum,Puget Sound Steelhead,Puget Sound Chinook,Marbled Murrelet(Adjacent Waters) Endangered: Southern Resident Killer Whale(adjacent waters designated critical habitat) 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. ' ""EA I1 The project is part of the Pacific Flyway,and important migration route for migratory birds. V� The site is used by migrating adult and juvenile salmon. —'-°----- ...1.._of d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: The project is driven by restoration,most project elements are designed to increase the usefulness of the area to wildlife. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. The completed project will have NO energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. • NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. Equipment used to construct the project will burn diesel fuel,and will be required to use vegetable oil hydraulic fluid, this creates the possibility of a spill,or the equipment could malfunction and catch fire. A septic drain field will be decommission and removed during the project. 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: Contractors will be required to have a spill kit in all active work areas to address the potential for spills. b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Traffic noise from highway 101 is prevalent at the site,especially the trail and waterline construction areas. 10 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise would consist of heavy equipment operation noise during weekday work hours from 8-5. LLO IT hr Page ' 11 TEM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR Wage_14,0ta02. AGENCY USE ONLY 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Work restricted to week days and hours 8-5. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. Given the proximity of Highway 101 to the project additional heavy machinery noise will be neglible. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Waterline and trail alignments are on a highway Right of Way.Restoration areas are public lands owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.These public lands receive low levels of public visitorship from folks looking to recreate on the property by fishing,hunting,walking,birding or boating. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 4 Creosote railroad trestles are on the project site. 2 Defunct sheds are on the project site 1 buried waterline is on the project site. 1 septic drain field is on the site d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? The 4 creosote RR trestles will be removed The 2 defunct sheds will be removed. The waterline will be abandoned and removed during site excavations. The septic drain field will be abandoned if an alternate system is constructed. If abandoned, it may be abandoned in place or dug out. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural residential 1:5 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural residential 1:5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project takes place along shorelines designated"Suburban".The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project is bordered to the North and West by shorelines designated"Natural",to theEast by shorelines designated"Conservancy/Natural",and to the South by shorelines designated"Suburban". 12 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. Much of the project borders wetlands which have been delineated in the attached wetland delineation. It occurs adjacent and along a marine shoreline. LC, ITEM i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? # ) Zero. page /= of_ j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Zero. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: LOG ITEM N/A # t Page // of d- 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? None proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: NA 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NA c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None 14 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: dd NA W Page O fae 15 ITEM 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Page of -.. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreation in the area is informal.The area is lightly used for outdoor recreation pursuits including fishing,bird hunting,shell fish harvest,passive recreation and boating. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No.The project increases recreational opportunities and access along the shoreline including the development of a section of a regional trail. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: NA 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: NA 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The site is accessible from the Hwy 101 shoulder.There are no formal access points planned as a part of this project. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, .25 mi. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking is provided or eliminated by the project. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No 16 LCG ITEM Page 17 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,inciicAte kvh peak volumes would occur. '" - M Increase tourism draw at the site may draw 2-3 vehicles per day. Page ` Cif }— g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: None needed. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. NA 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse serv- ice,telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. Waterline and septic system currently exist onsite,they are not"available"for any further hook-ups. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project will install a private water utility in the DOT right of way via typical construction methods. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: [ 71 /6 ; Date Submitted: - 3 18 LCG ITEM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR ''age of_ AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the,item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air; pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? The project is not likely to increase these things. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish,or marine life? The proposal is likely to positively affect plants,animals,fish and marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish,or marine life are: The project not only protects and conserves these resources by the use of BMPs during construction, its actions restore habitat and ecological processes in the area that are impaired and currently negatively impacting these resources. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? It wouldn't. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: NA 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? The proposal to provide positive impacts to these items. The removal of the RR grade may be viewed as some as altering a historic site. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: There are plans to include and interpretive sign about the old RR grade on sections that will not be removed,to tell the history of the area. 19 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal may increase recreational use of the shoreline.It would not encourage incompatible use. ITEM Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: ? f None -- 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposal is unlikey to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state,or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal does not conflict with these requirements. 20 - - - -AGENCY 1JSE I i Date`received US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE S08 a9p:;�,s` Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference# Application (JARPA) Form1'2 ; TaxParcell# ): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. � I Page 9 of Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help] Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project (USACOE Project#'s:NWS-2013-40, NWS-2013-109, NWS-2013-110 Throughout the application these numbers will be used to identify specific project elements as requested by the USACOE. Other permitting agencies, please ignore.) Part 2—Applicant • The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Long, Kevin 2b. Organization (If applicable) North Olympic Salmon Coalition 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 205 B W Patison St 2d. City, State, Zip Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail ( 360 ) 379-8051 ( ) ( 360) 379-3558 projectmanager @nosc.org Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpaoe ESA • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/jarpa iarpa form/9984/iarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or helpaora.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 21 P LLJ ITEM Y� /n Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [help] 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 3b. Organization (If applicable) 3c. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box) 3d. City, State, Zip 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail ( ( ) ( ) Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [help] ❑ Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) x There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. x Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at(360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Guzlas,Kyle 4b. Organization (If applicable) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 4c. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box) 600 Capitol Way N 4d. City, State, Zip Olympia, WA 98501-1091 4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail 360) 480-7723 ( ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 21 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] X Private ❑ Federal x Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal x Department of Natural Resources (DNR) —managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] No street address- see 5p 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Port Townsend, WA 98368 5d. County [help] Jefferson County 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1 Section Section Township Range NW 24 T29N RO2W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] • Example:47.03922 N lat.1-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47°59'41.05N lat./122°53'8.31 W long 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. WDFW Parcels: 902214005, 964516003, 902231004, 964516903, 902243046. Jefferson Land Trust Parcels 902243044, 902243033, 902243020. Calero Parcel 902243048. The waterline and trail portion of the project are located on WSDOT right of way for which there are,not assigned parcel numbers. 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel #(if known) THOMAS JOHNSON 325 E WASHINGTON ST# 179 964516004 .................................................................................................................................:........................................................................................................ BETTY KIRCHNER SEQUIM WA 98382-3488 KURT JAFAY PO BOX 1048 902231017 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... CARLSBORG WA 98324-1048 JENNIFER/JEFF PEDERSEN 2160 QUIMPER PL 964510002 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... JARRA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 21 LC G ITEM KAREN/SUSAN PEDERSEN PORT TOWNSEND WA983687307 Paae % ®f WSDOT, Highway 101 Right of Way Jefferson County Public Works Old Gardiner Road Right of Way 51 List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] The project area includes areas of freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands. A wetland delineation report is attached. 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [hell)] Within the project area and behind the railroad berm from southwest to northeast there is are three waterbodies: the cherry pond, the mill pond and lagoon. Discovery Bay is adjacent and to the south. An old railroad grade berm, and dredge spoils will be removed on the banks of Snow and Salmon Creeks(Figure 1, Vicinity Waterbodies) 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property [help] This project is split between habitat restoration of marine nearshore, and the relocation of a waterline (affected by that restoration) to the highway 101 right of way, and location of a regional trail along a portion of the new waterline alignment in the highway right of way. Because these elements are so different restoration and waterline/trail are each separately addressed for this section. Restoration area (USACOE# NWS-2013-40): The restoration site is categorized as a 'terrestrial/nearshore marine' type. Upland vegetation in the restoration project areas is generally comprised of invasive weedy species, with some young alder. Below the high tide line areas of the project area contain high salt marsh plant communities. Vegetation in the waterline/trail area (coinciding with WSDOT Right of Way) is grasses, invasive weedy species and occasional young fir or alder trees. Refer to plansets titled "Maynard Shoreline Restoration Project" and "Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project" Waterline project (USACOE # NWS-2013-109) and Trail project (USACOE# NWS-2013-110) Habitat conditions along the waterline/trail alignment are poor. This is a highway right of way and has been maintained as such. It offers little habitat value, with limited potential for an increase in this value. Habitat conditions in the restoration project area are degraded by the presence of an abandoned railroad grade built on tidelands and saltmarsh with significant negative impacts to the hydrology and ecology of the area. Refer to plansets titles "Waterline Replacement Project" The NOAA website identifies Discovery Bay as Essential Fish Habitat and Snow and Salmon Creeks are strongholds for ESA listed (threatened) Hood Canal Summer Chum salmon and the estuary is critical rearing area for juvenile summer chum. The Discovery Bay watershed is also home to ESA listed (threatened) Puget Sound Steelhead. There are major, human created, problems in the project footprint that have led to degraded habitat for salmon, forage fish and shellfish. The restoration project addresses habitat problems stemming from the construction of a railroad berm in 1917 that filled mud flats, beaches and estuarine habitats including: 1) The removal of-2500' lineal feet of Railroad grade to uncover historic marshes and beaches, restore habitat forming processes, and restore historic hydrology and sediment pathways. 2) The removal of 4 creosote railroad trestles that cross area stream and embayments 3) Improved connections of 4 small streams to the nearshore that have had their mouths buried by RR grade fills 4) The removal of large rip rap and concrete rubble armoring from section of the railroad grade being removed or recontoured 5) Removal of nearshore vegetation consisting primarily of invasive weedy species and replacement with marine riparian trees/shrubs or dune grasses on low backshores. At the Northern end of the project the trail and waterline share a position in the DOT right of way on a highway fill slope. Most of the area of impact of the slope is currently covered in grassy vegetation with an occasional fir, JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 21 LCG ITEM alder or willow tree. Downslope and waterward of the area of impact there is a conifer an 'ciduous marine riparian corridor established on what appears to be an old road grade. Page , `-7 of1 The waterline alignment continues south from the shared trail/waterline area within DOT right of way. Here the right of way is a grassy shoulder with patches of invasive weeds. The waterline crosses beneath Salmon and Snow Creek and beneath highway 101 by directional drilling. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [help] The restoration property is owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Jefferson Land Trust and currently used as a wildlife area. It was purchased specifically for conservation and nearshore restoration. The beach is used for recreational clamming. The lagoon is the study area for Olympia oyster research by the Jefferson County Marine Resources Committee. The waterline and trail properties are Washington State Department of Transportation Right of Way, or Jefferson County Right of Way. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] State Highway 101 is adjacent to the northwest of the project. DNR aquatic lands of Discovery Bay are to the south of the project. Gardiner Road (county road) and residential neighborhoods are to the northeast of the project. Properties adjacent to the central portion of the waterline project are commercial. 50. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and,current condition. [help) 1. 1800 foot long section of the rail road grade bed with 1250 feet of large rip rap or concrete rubble armoring, 1650 foot long section of railroad grade bed between and around Salmon and Snow Creek 2. Two 110 foot long creosote railroad trestles, one 50 foot long creosote trestle, and one 25 foot long creosote trestle 3. Standpipe and defunct, perched culvert under the railroad grade 4. Defunct tide gate 5. Private waterline transits area buried in the railroad grade, serves -20 residences 6. Fallen over barn and 2 small outbuildings. 7. There is a septic system on the Jefferson Land Trust property adjacent to Snow Creek. 8. There is a well head on the Calero property that will be decommissioned as part of the project. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map (help]$ Traveling North on Highway 101 the project area begins shortly before the intersection with highway 20. The waterline project begins nearby, extending along Hwy 101 for 7300'feet following it Northbound to just beyond the intersection of Highway 101 and Old Gardiner Road. Restoration elements begin Northward of the Highway 101 and highway 20 in the areas of Salmon and Snow Creeks. Continuing north on Highway 101 more shoreline restoration occurs NE of the Train Cars Restaurants at 282023 Hwy 101. (Figure 2, Snow Salmon Creek Estuary and Nearshore Restoration, Figure 3, Parametrix Siteplan) Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] The Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline. The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill. These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 5 of 21 LC G ITEM. processes. The project has 3 components 1) Shoreline restoration 2) Replacement of a p5b f disturbed by the restoration 3) Construction of a shoreline trail g Ode,- Specific elements of the Shoreline Restoration include(USACOE#NWS-2013-40): 1. Remove armor and restoring a more natural beach profile along an abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. 2. Restore tidal circulation to a currently-enclosed freshwater pond and wetland (Cherry Pond) 3. Remove fill from the mouths of 4 small tributary streams that flow into the project area. 4. Remove a creosoted timber railroad bridge (also called trestle). 5. Removing a non-functional culvert with tidegate between the lagoon and the mill pond. (1-5 see Maynard Shoreline Restoration, NOSC, 100% Design Set) 6. Removal of 1700 feet of Railroad grade and 3 associated railroad trestle bridges between and around Snow and Salmon Creek 7. Removal of sidecast dredge spoils and delta cone formation at the mouth of Snow Creek 8. Dispose of spoils onsite at upland location indicated on plansets. (Items 6-8 See Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project, NOSC, 100% Design Set) Specific elements of the Waterline Relocation include(USACOE#NWS-2013-109): 9. Relocate a waterline that was located within the railroad grade into the WSDOT right of way. 10. Directionally drill a cased crossing beneath Snow and Salmon Creeks for the waterline. 11 Extend a non-fish bearing, Hwy 101 culvert (Waterline replacement Project, Sheet W1, callout at 445+00) Specific elements of the Shoreline trail include(USACOE#NWS-2013-109): 12. Construct a segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the waterline alignment in the restoration project segment. 13. Construct rock walls, reinforced slopes and a soldier pile wall to support the trail prism and minimize ecological impacts of the trail. 14. Bridge two stream mouths with box culverts at downstream mouths of DOT culvert on fish bearing streams (Waterline Replacement project, Sheet W2, noted with callouts) (Items 9-14 see Waterline Replacement Project, 90% Design Set) 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it [help] There are several major, human created, problems in the project footprint that have led to degraded habitat for salmon, forage fish and shellfish. These problems all stem from the construction of a railroad grade in 1917 and the filling of mud flats, beaches and estuarine habitats for the construction and operation of a veneer peeling mill. The six major impacts include: 1. An artificial lagoon and mill pond was formed and is now connected with the Bay under a 110 foot long creosote railroad trestle. Contaminant leaching is directly adjacent to Olympia oyster and productive hardshell clamm beds. 2. A small stream and section of the shoreline were isolated from the Bay by and subsequently this became an isolated fresh water pond (the "Cherry Pond") maintained with a standpipe which drains through a now defunct, perched culvert under the railroad grade into the Bay. 3. Beach conditions in the nearshore are degraded due to the presence of large rip rap armoring the toe of the railroad grade and presence of creosote logs and concrete. The beach is over steepened and the substrate paved with fractured rock rendering it unsuitable for forage fish spawning habitat. 4. There is a defunct tide gate directly adjacent to Olympia oyster beds. 5. Throughout the area there is almost no native marine riparian vegetation, non-native vegetation dominates. 6. Three fresh-water drainages from the adjacent hillside are piped through the railroad berm straight to the Bay. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 6 of 21 LC3IEM 7. 1700 Feet of railroad grade and three creosote trestles bisect the Salmon and Snow CreiOlagearies impeding habitat forming processes and burying critical habitat for ESA listed species. ®$ 8. Sidecast dredge spoils and the formation of a delta-cone at the mouth of Snow Creek isolate the mouth of Snow Creek from natural connections to the adjacent saltmarsh/estuary. 9. A privately operated waterline is installed in the RR grade and will be moved as part of the project to allow construction of restoration elements. 10. The Olympic Discovery Trail, a regional trail system, had hoped to use the RR grade as a trail bed; however, because this alignment did not allow for robust restoration, a new alignment has been assigned along Highway 11. Due to equal interests in the trail and in restoration, local politics requires the construction of this segment of trail in concert with the restoration. The trail is the only unfunded portion of this project at this time. Depending on trail funding timing, the trail will be constructed at the same time as the waterline, the same time as the restoration project or after the waterline and restoration projects. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [helot ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation x Recreational ❑ Maintenance x Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [helpj '4Y1-41.-,4 ❑ Aquaculture x Culvert ❑ Float X Retaining Wall (upland) ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Floating Home x Road (TRAIL) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific [1] Boat Launch El Ditch ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift El Dock/ Pier ❑ Marina/ Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility X Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall'Structure ❑ Swimming Pool 1=1 Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal x Piling/Dolphin X Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft x Other: Nearshore restoration to remove nearshore fill (railroad grade) bulkhead ( shoreline armor), stream culvert, and a failed tide gate. Residential waterline will be relocated as required to maximize restoration benefits. Regional trail section will be built along a section of the new a waterline alignment 6e. Describe how you plan to-construct each project element checked in 6d Include specific construction methods-and equipment to be used [helpj. • Identify where each,element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody • Indicateewhich activities aretwithin the 100-year floodplam. try" JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 21 Waterline: The waterline will be installed in the highway right of way. It will be installed in a ditch dug by excavating equipment. The waterline crossing at Snow Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the south side of the Snow Creek Bridge. The waterline crossing at Salmon Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the north side of the Salmon Creek Bridge. Horizontal directional drilling (HDD) will be used to install a 12-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) casing. The drill entry and exit points for the HDD will be 75 feet upland of ordinary high water at Snow Creek and 100 feet upland from ordinary high water at Salmon Creek. The vertical alignment at both creeks will be at least 10 feet below the stream bed and approximately 200 feet in length. Bentonite drilling fluid will be used during the bore, to maintain the hole size during reaming, and to facilitate the pipe string pull back. Cuttings, tailings, and the bentonite drilling fluid will be disposed of off-site at an approved disposal site. The HDPE pipe will be fused together to form a single,joint-less pipe string using heat fused butt joints. Following installation of the 12-inch HDPE casing, an 8-inch PVC water line will be pulled through the casing.(See Waterline Replacement Prject, 90% Design Set) Trail: The trail will be constructed on the Highway embankment by cut and fill. The fill will be held in place by rock walls, reinforced slopes, and a soldier pile wall. The trail will not be within a 100 year floodplain. It will be located along the marine shoreline above MHHW and at a distance from MHHW averaging 40 feet (See Waterline Replacement Project 90% Design Set) Restoration: Excavation areas are typically adjacent to tide waters of Discovery Bay. Excavation will not occur in water. Where tidal influence is present, excavation work will be completed when site is not inundated by tide waters. Contractor will use caution mobilizing and demobilizing. Shoreline grading, bulkhead removal, and RR grade removal will occur from the RR grade so that machinery will not need to travel below OHW. Silt fences will be installed around all activities that involve dredge, fill, stockpiling or structural removal. All work will conform to local, state and federal agency requirements. The approved window for fisheries will be adhered to as required by the HPA. The contractor will verify that the existing waterline has been decommissioned prior to any grading or clearing. The contractor will verify all clearing limits with the project engineer prior to any vegetation removal.A de-watering system, including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals, and fill removal adjacent to streams. Creosote trestle bridges will be removed following Best Management Practices and Specifications developed by the Washington State DNR on similar creosote removal projects. Much of the shoreline restoration work takes place within a designated 100 year floodplain. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (Month/Year) [help? • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: _3/2014 End date: _6/2015 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals,`etc. [hel ] LC $3.4 millionC` ITEIVI 6h. Will any p ortion of the project receive federal funding? [help] P e 3, • If yes, list each agency providing funds. x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know United States Fish and Wildlife Service NOAA-Fish America Foundation Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation X Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page B of 21 This is a restoration project of a highly altered system. Most elements in the project increase wetland . sometimes converting them from their current configurations as freshwater wetlands back to it hilt i r condition of being saltwater wetlands. Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) Page of , 1) The construction of the railroad berm and associated impoundment of water created the small freshwater wetlands associated with the Cherry Pond. Restoration efforts will return these wetlands to as close as is possible to their historic form and function. At the Cherry Pond the project creates an estuarine wetland with fish access instead of a perched freshwater wetlands disassociated from the nearshore with no fish access. 2) The restoration project area has areas of other freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands associated with freshwater drainages and the marine environment, these are highly altered, partially filled, with little saltmarsh habitat at the freshwater/saltwater interface. This project will enhance these areas by the removal of fill to create space for additional saltmarsh habitat at these small drainages. Where feasible culvert sections will be removed and streams daylighted. 3) The project creates 8.8 acres of wetland that are currently occupied by RR grade fill, sidecast dredge spoils or delta-cone sediments. 4) Lower Disco Bay Shoreline trail (NWS-2013-110): The trail alignment are pinched between the shoreline and highway 101. This is the only feasible alignment for this infrastructure. The areas of the trail and waterline alignment are maintained by the Washington Department of Transportation as Highway Right of Way and are mostly upland in nature. Two culverts mouths emptying from under Hwy 101 will be bridged with 10' box culverts. These impacts are minimal compared to the overall amount of wetland restoration accomplished by the project. Impacts are captured in Table 7h below. 5) Lower Disco Bay Waterline (NWS-2013-109): The waterline alignment is entirely on DOT right of way and located as close to the pavement edge as allowed by DOT to keep the waterline alignment in upland habitats and out of wetlands or their buffers. Where the waterline crosses Snow and Salmon Creek it will be directionally bored beneath the creeks using BMPs and methods described in 6e. For one short section a culvert draining a non-fish bearing stream will need to be extended and the wetland around the culvert filled. 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know --Restoration, impacts are positive, enhancing wetland function 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] x Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know --Restoration, impacts are positive, enhancing wetland function 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? h[ ] • If Yes,submit the report,including data sheets,with the JARPA package. xYes No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating a.... System? [help] _ + If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. xYes No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to,compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands?,[helot • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and.answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required ❑ Yes ❑ No x Not applicable JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 9 of 21 The project will restore freshwater and tidally influenced wetlands to as near to historic nearshore function as is possible given the highly altered nature of the system. The scope and scale of restoration is so great and wetland impacts so minimal that a mitigation plan is unwarranted. 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used design the plan, Not applicable. ITEM Page - ofd 7h. Use the table below to list the tylpeaand rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. ihelal Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood,etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) Restoration(NWS �' 201340 Excavate:Breach Cherry Pond Freshwater 1 acre Permanent None N/A RR grade which Category II -restoration will Drain Cherry to historic Pond, and function reconnect to saltwater influence (Cherry Pond reverts to saltmarsh) Excavate: Remove Upland N/A-currently 8.8 Permanent None Snow Creek RR Converted to the area is -restoration grade, dredge Wetland upland in to historic spoils, and delta (historic nature function cone. Will allow condition) tidal flooding of these areas . 1 vaterline(NW A r u V `� v wiiliu�lih" ', i i 171urrMl I hr uvfd� L 2013'109).,r 400liiikoci,firk7= Culvert Extension Cherry Pond Freshwater 154 Permanent C Adjacent of nonfish bearing Category II square creation of 8.8 DOT stream feet acres of crossing and Category I wetland fill wetland 1 If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P), Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) JAF2PA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 21 ITEM Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: N/A # amotttittil.04b4 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h; describe the source and nature of the fill;materi' the yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [heipi age Waterline Project(NWS-2013-109):Fill material will come from a local pit or potentially from the adjacent restoration area. Soils will be gravelly/sandy pit run. Approximately 100 cubic yards will be placed. The fill prism will be approximately 18' long by 14' wide by 11' tall. It will be retained by rock walls and a trail placed on top of it. Beneath the fill a culvert bearing storm and surface water from the West side of highway 101 will be extended approximately 20' to maintain its connection to the wetland. This stream has been deemed non-fish bearing by WDFW. 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of.materia in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. thg221 Prior to any excavation silt fencing and other erosion control measures will be installed per plan sets and where required to prevent sediment or sediment laden waters from reaching the waters of the state. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) Cherry Pond: 300 cy of RR grade fills will be removed to reconnect the Cherry Pond with the marine shoreline. Y Y 9 The Creek feeding the Cherry and will be diverted and the and drained using BMP's prior to the breaching of g Yp pond 9 p 9 the RR grade. The RR grade will be removed with excavators, loaded into dump trucks and hauled to a permitted upland disposal site. All work will occur in the dry. Snow Creek RR grade, sidecast spoils, delta-cone removal: 23,000 cy of material will be removed from these areas to restore the marsh to its historic configuration. The material will be removed with excavators, loaded into dumptrucks, and hauled to an adjacent upland site for disposal. All work will occur in the dry. Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] x Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment [help] ❑ Not applicable Lower Disco Bay Trail (NWS-2013-110): The trail is located as far from MHHW as is feasible. The design considers existing native marine riparian vegetation and strives to have the minimal impact to this vegetation possible. The trail project will require the construction of rock wall, reinforced slopes and soldier pile wall. These elements are included in the design to minimize impact to adjacent shoreline riparian vegetation by minimizing trail prism width. Two box culverts will bridge the mouths of culvert outfalls on fishbearing streams at the downstream end of 101 culverts. Waters flowing through the existing culverts will be diverted during construction of the box culvert. WDFW has looked at these streams and determined one could hold resident fish and the other anadromous fish if the Hwy 101 culverts were passable (which they are not). Lower Disco Bay Waterline (NWS-2013-109): The waterline will be located as near as possible to the paved highway shoulder, it will not impact waterbodies. Where the waterline crosses Salmon and Snow Creeks it will cross 10' beneath the creek through a directionally drilled and cased shaft. Impacts associated with the creek crossing would be a 10 foot wide construction path used in trenching for waterline hook up to the shaft. No significant streamside vegetation would be impacted by the trenching, mostly grasses and invasive weeds. One culvert extension on a WSDOT culvert will be required for JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 21 construction of the trail prism. Waters flowing through this culvert will be diverted during construotio oi> E the culvert extension. This stream is considered non-fish bearing by WDFW. The construcon path would be seeded, strawed and planted with native shrubs prior to back out. '� Page. ` -®f � Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40): Prior to restoration actions below MHHW the harvestable shellfish resource in the project footprint will be harvested by the local tribes. These resources will be reseeded post project by WDFW. Olympia oysters in the project footprint will be temporarily relocated during project construction. To date, forage fish spawning surveys at the site during likely spawning windows have not detected surf smelt or sand lance spawn. Access and phasing is key to performing work at appropriate tidal stages. NOSC will require that the contractor submit a detailed project schedule that will require them to think through all of the steps and how they will be executed with consideration given to the tidal cycle. The first phase of construction will be waterline and trail construction. These will be undertaken as soon as permits are in hand. Once the new waterline is in and water rerouted into it, restoration actions can proceed. It is anticipated that fish and weather windows will make summer/fall 2014 the likely timeframe for restoration element construction. There will be two distinct restoration project areas, the Maynard Shoreline Restoration Area and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Area (Figure 2) with individual implementation schedules designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. Maynard Shoreline (Figure 2, and Maynard Shoreline Restoration Design Set) The first phase of work in the Maynard Shoreline is the removal of a110' creosote RR trestle spanning the opening into the Lagoon. DNR BMPs for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the specifications, and the contractor is required to submit a 'bridge removal plan'. A crane can be mobilized to the site, so a barge will not be necessary Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent RR grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Except for the extraction of subtidal pilings on the RR trestle, all work will occur in the dry. The second phase of construction is earthwork to remove/modify the RR grade beginning at the NE end. When excavation and grading is required below MHHW it will occur in the dry and be performed from the RR grade. RR grade removal will take place in sections. In a given section during one low tide cycle the contractor will remove bulkheads, excavate and remove fill, overexcavate unsuitable beach material and backfill with appropriate beach substrate so that by the time the tide returns the beach is in its desired configuration. The sensitive nature of the grading and site in general makes contractor experience critical. NOSC will hire qualified contractors with experience working in tidal areas. There are many aspects of the grading will benefit from field supervision by an individual with the authority to make field adjustments. The NOSC project manager will be onsite to serve this purpose. The project manager will also assure BMP's and permit conditions are being followed. A portion of suitable excess fill will be used on-site. Excess and unsuitable fill will be hauled off site to an appropriately permitted disposal or reuse area provided by the contractor. Proof of a permitted disposal site will be required from contractors in order to submit a bid. The third phase of construction will be the dewatering and breaching of the Cherry Pond and recontouring of the RR grade in this reach (Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plan Sheet C 2.3). The contractor will be required to submit for engineers approval a creek diversion and pond dewatering plan prior to performing work. All excavation will take place in the dry during low tides. The fourth phase of construction(could take place at any point during construction) is the enhancement of salt marsh benches and stream daylighting(culvert removal) at the mouth of two small freshwater drainages at the South end of the project (Maynard Shoreline Restoration Plan Sheet C2.1, C 2.2) All excavation will take place in the dry during low tides. The northern streams culvert will be shortened by 50 feet from its outfall, and replaced with a natural stream channel. The stream will be diverted during this work. Post project, the site will be planted in native species (See Figure 4: Maynard Planting Plan). JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 21 ITF Snow Creek Estuary Restoration (Figure 2,3 and Engineered Design Set) Pad" of The first phase of work at the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration is the removal of 3 creosote RR trestles. DN� BMPs for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the specifications, and the contractor is required to submit 'bridge removal plans'. A crane can be mobilized to the site, so a barge will not be necessary Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent RR grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Work will occur at low tides. Streamflows will be diverted around work areas to allow piles to be pulled in the dry. The second phase of work will be removal of the RR grade between Salmon and Snow Creek and of the delta- cone and sidecast dredge spoils adjacent to Snow Creek. There will be no in water work associated will fill removal. Fill removal will be timed to occur at tides lower than the excavation work. Excavation in a given area will be completed on a single tidal cycle so that returning tidal waters flow across the final graded surface on their return to the site. Removed fill will be disposed an an upland on-site area, and used to fill in benches in the landscape created during previous site development for homesites. Post project the site will be planted with native species. Estuarine areas will be left unplanted as these areas quickly recruit native saltmarsh vegetation from neighboring stock. The upland fill disposal site will be replanted with native shrubs and trees. ( See Figure 6 Snow Creek Estuary Planting Plan) 8b.' Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? {help] x Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's.adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help] • If Yes,submit the'plan with the DARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. [' Yes ❑ No x Not applicable There are no significant anticipated adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies. The goal of the restoration project is to return nearshore functions to as close to historic nearshore functions as possible and enhance where historic conditions cannot be recreated. 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan, • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] Not applicable— nearshore restoration project. 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name location 2 impact 3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly waterbody affected Restoration (NWS2013 40) �� [ ,.. � 91 I . w,'ry^ w . '''°11111'11111 r. �aIV�lll 11 RR Grade Discovery in Permanent 11,160 removed from 1850 linear feet JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 21 Removal Bay and adjacent to Maynard waterbody Onsite fill No impact, 5,160 adjacent (not q disposal, create in) ' Tr Maynard Adjacent backshore Discovery hill that will (6? Bay be planted Page ®fL2 with native plants Beach grading Discovery Adjacent No impact 0 0 Bay Culvert removal Discovery Adjacent No impact 0 0 Bay Armor/rubble Discovery Adjacent Permanent 2500 tons of rock and 1480 lineal feet removal Bay concrete rubble of bulkhead removed removed Trestle Bridge Discovery Permanent 6251 cu ft of creosote 2910 square feet removal Bay debris removed of shading in overwater structure removed Tidegate Discovery Permanent —10 Cy of beach 120 square feet Removal Bay material will be used in to repair the hole in the bed left by removed tidegate RR Grade/ Discovery Permanent 23,000 CY of fill 8.8 acres Dredge Spoils/ Bay material removed restored to Delta Cone Adjacent/In historic state Removal at Snow Creek Estuary Waterline 1.1111111 (NUNS-2013-110) Directional Drill Snow Creek Adjacent- Temporary 0 0 and Salmon may Creek impact vegetation within stream buffer 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill.mater,ial, amount:(n cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [he p] JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 21 Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) For the most part this is a fill removal project. Some restoration project elements will require backfilling. 1) When the tidegate is removed the resulting hole in the bed will be filled with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent RR grade. 2) In places where the beach surface has become armored with cobble or concrete spilling from the RR grade, this material will be overexcavated and replaced with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent RR grade LC _ ITFnV! 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] . Lower Disco Bay Restoration (NWS-2013-40) Prior to any excavation silt fencing and other erosion control measures will be installed per plan sets and where required to prevent sediment or sediment laden waters from reaching the waters of the state. Grading (excavation and filling) work will be completed when sites are not inundated by tide waters. Most work will take place by excavator and dump truck. Removed fill will be disposed of mostly onsite with a small amount to be transferred to a permitted offsite location. Most of the material to be removed is sands and gravels mined from a local pit for RR grade construction. Rock and concrete placed for bulkheading will also be removed. Creosote trestle bridges will be removed with cranes and vibratory pullers. DNR BMP's for removal of creosote piling in marine waters will be used. Where freshwater streams cross under trestles, the flows will be diverted from interacting with piles being actively pulled. Piling will be disposed of at a landfill permitted to accept creotsote material. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. rhelpl Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent. Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360 )379-4466 10/30/12 WDFW Margie Schirato (360)427-2179 1/13 USACOE Tina Tong (206) 764-6913 2/13 DNR Bridget Kaminsky- (360)732-0934 9/6/12 Richardson DOE Rick Mraz (360) 407-6221 9/6/12 DOT Jim Narramore (360) 570-6747 2/13 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? 'Ihelol • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. l i • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: :_ :,1 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 15 of 21 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wo/303d/. i TEM ❑ Yes xNo 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110019 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? '[help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. WRIA 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.aov/programs/wa/swas/criteria.html for the standards. x Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [heipl • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban x Natural ❑ Aquatic [' Conservancy x Other Priority Aquatic 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertypingaspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. x Shoreline C Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? (help] • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. xYes ❑ No Name of manual: 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) 91 Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [help] • If Yes, please describe below. ❑ Yes x No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 16 of 21 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. ihelel - Railroad grade bed and veneer peeling mill and associated log ponds. Hi hvvov right ofvvay • If Yes, attach it to your JARPA Package. ' X Yes [1] No See attached Technical Memo 1102F-1a, May 3, 2011, Cultural Resources Assessment for the Maynard Shoreline P jmct, JefhanaonCountv. VVaehinotonandTmohnica| K8emo112F-1bCultuna| Resources Assessment for the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration P ject, Jefferson County, Washington LCry 8�^� x � ----r- JARPA Revision 2012 1 Page 17 of 21 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [helot Puget Sound steelhead Puget Sound chinook salmon 1- FM Hood Canal summer chum salmon Page_-- L�.4t 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's-Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help) Steelhead, Pink Salmon, Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Chum Salmon, Olympia oyster, Western Toad, freshwater wetland habitat, riparian habitat, eelgrass habitat Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecv.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or help(a�ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply) [help] • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.gov/prooramsfsea/sepa/e-rev ew.html. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. x A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson County_(lead agency). The expected decision date is _July 2013_ ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.)[help] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 18 of 21 10b Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check,?ll that apply.) [help] „ LOCAL GOVERNMENT °f ' 1,1 Local Government Shoreline ermi ( (T x Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance El Pa Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): s®f Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit x Critical Areas Ordinance Yi STATE GOVERNMENT °' Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: X Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption —Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for $150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# ) ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ❑ M• ineral prospecting and mining. ❑ P• roject occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor, or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# ) Washington Department of Natural Resources: x Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: x Section 401 Water Quality Certification x CZMA Consistency :.: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.-t. ti _ � ' United States Department of the Army permits U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ( p x Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: El General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 19 of 21 IM Page Page 20 ot 21 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includgsfthe project plans, photos, etc. [help] 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [help[ Page .. of =� I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) //€7.V; ZO Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 1'1c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). [help] Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. WI)F1_ l �,le Gu zl R-5 A _ , 571;21113 13 Property Owner Printed Name Prope ./owner Sigf.tu ` Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. if you require this document in another format, contacf.the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev.06-12 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 20 of 20 "1 [! M ; AGENCY USE ONLY us Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE Wig; ; Date received, Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) a Tax Parcel A(s)s Attachment A: For additional property owner(s) to_p_ 3 F�.EZ ►RYA eA ; , r r I Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Proie+ct Use this attachment only if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on e)likigliiTtF4titvay or easements. Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. 1. Name(Last,First,middle).and Organization (if appilc a e) Caiero, Christopher and Susan 2. Milling Address(street or PO Box) '7-101 ., A-A„‹. t 3, City, State, Zip >. Phone(1) 5. Phone(2) 6. Fax ' 7. E-mail (360)518-5455 ( ) ( ) blackwaterdiving©juno.com Address or tax parcel number of property you own: 173 Fairmount Road, Port Townsend WA, 98368 Parcel#902243048, Signature of Property Owner I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. teiry Printed Name Signature If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number:ENV-020-09 rev.06-12 C441.Y US Arrny Carps WASHINGTON STATE of Eng Imo& Date receict Soollio District , Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) [help] Agency rirence ',1:Tax Parcel t-ks); :"` Attachment A: - A For additional property owner(s) fhelp] I '1111, itn1.19] Project Name:Maynard Beach Nearshore Restoration Project Use this attachment only if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on exiptptg,cigilisroirway or easements. Page 57-6-f-7-,20.-- Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white s_paces below. 1. Name (Last'','Fil't',..4iddle) a10-ganizeiticIV applicable) P:-tor M. Washington Department of Transportation Olympic Region 2, 4gi et Of 6639 Capitol Boulevard SW, Suite 302 7 - . .77:71T4/44it,'" 7:7 3:'City State:Zip 98501 4 Phone 5A.Pflone c2) 6 Fax 7 pial ( 360) 570-6743 Address orlax parcel nl:Irrtbr of properly you ovvri:14:4, , - Highway 101 Right of Way Signature of Property Owner _ -- - I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, *ce to the landowner. Printed Name Sign"at.yre If you require this document in another format,contact the Governors Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number:ENV-020-09 rev.06-12 JARPA Attachment A Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 1 1 AGENCY USE ONLY • WASHINGTON STATE Date received: Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) [help] Agency reference#: Tax Parcel#(s): Attachment A: For additional property owner(s) [help] r ��r TO BECOAIPLETEDBYAPPLICANT[�]gfgJ Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Use this attachment all if you have more than one property owner. Complete one attachment for each additional property owner impacted by the project. Signatures of property owners are not needed for repair or maintenance activities on exisIr?righ spy or easements. Page of,2a2, Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. • 1. Name(Last, First,Middle)and Organization.(if applicable) Sarah Spaeth, Jefferson Land Trust 2. Mailing Address(Street or PG Box) . 1033 Lawrence Street 3. City, State, Zip Port Townsend, WA 98368 4. Phone(1) 5. Phone(2) 6. Fax 7. €-mail • (360) 379-9501 ( ) ( ) sspaeth©saveland.org Address or tax parcel number of property you own: . 31 Fairmont Dr, Port Townsend WA, 987363. Parcel#'s 902243044, 902243033, 902243020. • Signature of Property Owner I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical,with prior notice to the landowner. Printed Name 3c..rte,. S\_9ct-C--%('1- Signature 04--e-41-. If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-020-09 rev. 06-12 JARPA Attachment A Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 1 8 pia I AO NOY USE ONLY J i WASHINGTON STATE lls Army Corps of Engineers:' , Date.reCelYetl Seattle Uatfiq I I Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) [IE G ITEM Agency reference#: of /0/I Tax Parcel#(s) ':: Attachment Ge Contact information for adjoining TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT[hel-PI property owners. [helg] Project Name: Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Use this attachment only if you have more than four adjoining Location Name(if applicable): property owners. Use black or blue ink to enter answers in white spaces below. 1. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if,known) g GARY KEISTER TRUSTEE 6156 OLD GARDINER RD 964509906 SUSAN M KEISTER TRUSTEE PORT TOWNSEND WA983689779 MILDRED NORTHUP.TRUSTE 215 NAVAL AVE 964514806 CHESTER I NORTHUP BREMERTON WA983124051 KAREN BLESSING PO BOX 1491 902231010 PORT TOWNSEND WA983680044 SEA-KOTA INC 2183 CRESCENT BEACH RD 902243024, 902234010, 902243007 PORT ANGELES WA983638703 DOROTHEA TOOKER 1215 JEFFERSON ST 902233012 PORT TOWNSEND WA983686620 CARL SCHMIDT 282624 US HIGHWAY 101 902243014, 902243010, MIYO SCHMIDT 902243013 PORT TOWNSEND WA983689334 JAMES ANDREW 6150 OLD GARDINER RD 902243015 PORT TOWNSEND WA983689779 If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. JARPA Attachment C Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 1 ,.. ... 4.cii,o, * \ ■• ' " '`.11■"'111Pi.t,r'"4:tGeliY'' ,41040* o, Maynard Lagoon ..., ..,- , _....------ -,i' - , — <%- ,,---,.,.. '' • ' '''--,-_-'1-",--`-, i-• .,..,„4,- '"R'4 Mill Pond , 1 --"' -,,----, '-- 5 ,.... ' ..*... .:'58,,,,," ,.. ,--, ._ ;;;-,,,-_,- r i , ' Y.).'%17`; ) ., Maynard Nearshore '."•. , Ys ' i'lif*---?.'-'-‘;'' eir ''''''"' * of Restoration r.,-,.fl, ''''',,,.. - ' '—''''5 :---- '' — . '''' ' ''''''''-'144fr ''''''": ' her ' =7 , *,,' Discovery Bay , s - -'°— 4' I ,, 0„,, 0.. ' "1,,,,:"" 4. Aj. Cc°e \c` ' o 4t. c ' - *I -;., ' S o,f . ,... 0 , 4.._ 4,.. .., ..., , . , ., , s,,,,... • , irt , , ,,..,. .1„:„,,,,.. c., ) +i Snow Creek Estuary / Railroad Grade‘ • ' '''* '' ' \ ''''''''''''''''''I' -4'. ' . d Restoration and i : '' , - -,,`"1.,..'iti!!''-,"'"..':-.,;:::7-4,_?'''-4*Zr. i 4 ' ..,, ''. '.„..'ar It.14*.4*-•,' ,T,i .7%,.. ,(....'.., -,7":141i..i. .i.:,..f.,..,:;-*;,,,Alt--,„-,f," ''.'il.,..i,te. ,'''-':.'ti`,,,,.:2.1 , . ,,,„,,,, -,„,,a,.,a - ,„,„, ,. , - , , .a ,- , - ...1.,e• a . . -1:,---.11--'4•, * '1":''''''4,...,/,}'.,::...I 7'. '°..,'`.';',.,.;7'7'7",''''. le; ,* '. - * #.-*4*' P", ; P' '' *, •,.., ,, ,'' ., . '''''-' ,. -*, ..* ,, -,IN, '/1,, ' ,,,Tt,..°,44,^4;;;,,,,4 ' 4111,„ AA ,°, ,,;''■ ...' ., ',4,° ''''„ ''' -7. ° „, ,,- .,''',1 r( --5, -,--,,,,,',,-,4 4 jo-,4'4,.. ; 'i 1''‘',-..' !:*.4",,,:,211: II 4N 'AIII-Sitg.,,, .444 Discovery Bay Restoration: DEPARTMENT OF ',I°,,, , klc..- ''' 1!C s-r:CA1- - Snow and Salmon Cree s ,v,,,, estoratio ..i.,,- Vicinity Waterbodies k .-;', Snow L t cr-4•4tINAr." '',",';'.'' 4"6"L''''''' 1 7■,.., N 60 Waterline Relocation I Olympic Discovery Trail 1: :, N 0 230 460 Feet —a mini mRaaiylrnoaardd Nearsho A 'Figur I e 1 1 Discovery Bay Water Bodies Railroad Trestietpage , FdnA) rd �� �' J' #'3 ca k•. fir}. "'^4*• 5 r • d r �L § tip` :,0000, - y • ' " . /,/rA y S sI pro 1 * • /// r ' Yoa '.. r Maynard Nearshore ° -`-z �« , "� - � Restoration fit" f r 5 r: - ke i I ,..r' J•.{)', '1'.` I U -,.�- obm wa LEI ," � Discovery Bay ■ I '� " , ■ "� p �� f 1 O�Gse ` ` , - s •1, ' t ' I , , _'. ,♦ . I... t I i'► I s ,'1 I, ` - 3 t Y ,..1 ,,... -. i _ ' — "''�` E® ! "' Snow Creek Estuary Restoration �. and Railroad Grade Removal _u. r I I r , t Snow/Salmon Creek Estuary and -Snow and Salmon Creeks f Snow Creek Estua 4,_ Nearshore Restoration ry L E ' ,,; y 4,,............. sq ry r w Waterline Relocation -Railroad Grade Rerri-aI ( .a» �M o. o„ N 0 245 490 Feet +Olympic Discovery Trail ®Maynard Nearshore®R p' N(gyp A i I I fLA WDFW Property ♦ Railroad Trestles 1 �gtr„�1t� ,,y _ Fl In;BOa[ti „�f'+a.rrrt�J" iD`9+rWHDIJFE Figure 2 //I f ? 0 d z • ;g m z 0 ,* . ' 2 7 C r cS v o x e' w y ^ !z R ._ t >, 4` D O CO J O Z I2 J r �J Q Z Q W ,, t W ,it4: . _ , O..; it, 11J — / * 41 " i , 1E1E/ 1- f : Z U-1 , O w , ,,. ..,,, ,Z /4,.. Li_i.kk I . 0 ce „ i ,. , , ,,.. „ (,..9 j ,t J N 0) U-1 LLI U W Z 0 p Q t. © F— h W Z0 �` . a Q LU Q O W $ w o m �V Q 0 w W • a w 0 ° U" a z co Vii: O Z s co N' N p as:J3NIONVO Ol0 - �. Q. ,, w ; L LL `� CC a Z LL w \ # a w 6 0 LOG ITFM f Maynard Shoreline, Plan-hin j Plan -1________L____ age of� - t ©o/1116 Firs J 0 Short Pine, Pry,sandy soil S to++h a need for salt i -tolerance.Trees will be.at 104 S n M wi+h noo4k&.rose planted b'e new s-ft. .'^► ttibAlt S Nootka ?laps toil) liktly need to be c4.aiereA a ODT trail Nladrone And invaSives nidin wined. A few lo' .i&h mOdrona will be plaaled initially fo Aso . See The MiCeeSS l'ak en*1iS site. - ..1ftmo. Cheri Yon4 i A sts �o4- :.-,. 4 ! - e iii.,_, 0 cat . , ar 's, r • ,,,IL).- - . 04;11 1 r. ., i r -7 ' t � . 4111%41144111414ENN o Figure 4 . 0 i 1 PagLE9-- el-t4d2,, 1 I vS CI 4.4 s a a r C5 1 %V S v- tr,... ter) ..,V .g1 I g s .1., 71,a_ r to .is. tz .s t I f a 1 I 0 d‘ , J b,9 „ , 1 N , N NO 1 Figure 5 at 0 0 u (--i ,,f f. 6 7— 0 a 'a ....z R.,.-. cr-3 t- . -•'" a In •21 r- IP Ili el I. - . • , • 4, ‘J 4100 i • ///' I • 0. - alik ', • .0..„ • : 4 ' 44 •; / ‘ll C4 • •*s•1 * • . •4° .4 • 4 . ° 0 4 ` C • llb • A 40 • • gl CD lir 0 41111" * • N , tl • , s • • 'Pr: • .,=1 ,1 - ..) 5 11 7 , , . , . • 't . -.4•• 71 4 ',',-, ' ' Al' C . • ,, 0 ATO' 7:: 1 .•' l' 0 • '***1 *I .1.. :.ti . ,-* , , • i ..73- ....... ..„....„. ... . ki.._ ..0.. . . f=:, 2 2 11 1 l • 0 • fA,-- .. ------A. . ,. . . , 7.-Y". fN *0, 0* k ' ' • 0 t 0 * . a 41, r i•A 4 f 4 io ,,1 6 ilk,. ;-- • tt.r. _ vl Ari 3 .,. . 1 1 4 i tr8 4 • • • tit o 4 -1,1.-- 2,,,i .. g 1 'rAarfs t“ L56 cm • I,:0 LOG IT, r.... Page -, xrz, --- _s,t \".:,,, . - ,,,,,, ,,, .N; ,-,. 0.,„,..z......c.--- -.,.., .,, --„,,, ,, _,. ......, - ' "7" . .. -• - , .....i t ; .,, % _. :- .t. ). ,' .,, •••• -..' ''.114.-7, '." -.• ,"--- \ I ._ -,p ,,_. -..., ,.. . ......,,„ w., ..,......_,.......,„„,„.....,0,0 .-....,17,....., 1 --, -' ,4'..-7•,-....tk-s...,,-.-"N„- - .!.- , .... , . r.,.0,5,t„,-•-, "--„..,-.-N.,,,,,,z,,-, .:. C-4 ,:.- - . __ i . -, , ,,, . • ..L 0 !. .., 4.' - ‘,, '''':‘ , ..r;IL . , . 7.--,. .:J ' - "."--,,,7.:.? -• ,., ' ' ti▪ ii;. . * $ - . .,...1 r-- ,...` ' r 0 ' ' ''---- 71. ' %-.) ' ' '.1.'-'' ' \ . 9 r11..... ..v ,...,,,-,,,,, --.:,../..,- 1.. , - 60 40 ' , ,,, . • -, 1.: , - „..:,..‘,.,c, tf .° .7 ./.. I ,c,i> .,7--,77A.. ,, . 7 • "N,- - ,-714 , 0 - . 4:- Il . . . -,4i-‘ ....7„........ , , 1 ,I . ..E...7t.r.,,• ‘0.7 0:.., L: ,.''', \, \*-47-71---7"...."-.7:7-7":\ \ :., ,, ..._.,.. .,\.... .. • 0 ---,,.- -6 .... el.- ezt r L,.. e.„.....• , _ VI, * . ' I re ', • . ,r,. ' '. \ -.. \\,,, ,.. „,, -,,,„ --,,-..---.....,.._ ---r- cr fn ' i ,• k* * .41, -,,,-4 ' *I a A• q , _ . . , . . . . , -r:-. . 1, , 11 • .1- -j..e,,, ,6'i. Vt.:\ `-...'.:... '''''''' '''-7/R,Li.0) - , . .. • .,_ 2 ' ' •- ' ' :`,, •it,.•Z - . 41°" •• '.. ‘,'':'Atclts,--_,„,,,,,, ',.. i. '- (i) 40.4, .- . t'd — , ,, ; ,41` f Y ' ' 1 .1.: ,:,3/4,1 4%. ' • ' , " l,' - 73' - Ps,••V% -, -'''‘.-...„ I, '-"-11- t : . - ..112. t i '''• l' * '' - '''''''''Pq Ptisq„„' .2 !a, , „... _ ' ''--.4. :,. -- : • l' . it ,0fertit,i. _ — ,,, .._,,.-,■,--Lizti -•' : ‘ t„ _...e.. . _ ao PI ,....V - -- — , --(-. .. •'tv !....,„..,,,-- •, ',.,.„,,, --.--.\ ... ,_ f...-- * f....■ -, ".. C ‘.1°' '' -je <I) , > -. -''',.,„ 'fi ,..' I I 0 N...,•*"......."' ',..„.........",,,„ ---,,,,,,_ •,-.., •,, ...• ca ,. v5 441'6 1.47)' 1 a IT- I . CS kk,,, ' ■...,- \ --,,,, \ --,,, ,,,,,,i, _ .-,..- K -...„, ,.„,,,.,„ ,...--^ A i \ \ s--•.-N -.iti:-/,,,, --"" , - < — , .,,- ) t„,..2,, .,,, \,,,,,,i,v, ,,,t_ ,: 1.4,0.,.._ .....,,,,,,--,ri r. .• . .,.. . . _ ,....... .... ,. / L,.' '.''- ''' .., ,, i N N., • ''''''''''',..N\\ 6.,.: %.,,,I. ''*-,-„,,....\ -Th''''''2,,,,,,,.''':•0, ................4..'"-,,. !C •• al • ... ../.._,_,. --V-- ti'■,_, ! i - • 411- .\,.. -.\., -- ...., .......:„..., _ .....• ,..,..„- „ ... '''.----,_. - ---..-:',. ----„,.: -...„--,, ,‘ .,), i • 1 . --,,,,, ▪ „.. . ......,. , , ____ 5,6 ......,, „,,,.. ,,,,„ „.....„-„, % , . i e...... ..?--.. ..,.,..„, 644` • .1/4,...,, ....., .1.."-..... or . ' , .., , . . r .u. f•- _,.., • ,. - ... -, ---—.7-7: -,---- .'....: ”. -'4*,,,,,,,,,......",........1::::,....,,,,,.. -:',...cS'i.,''' - '''.,*.\/r . °.Z:''''‘ ''' Ill D ..,. ..,_ --....f LT •\ '''....'\ 1 k t I Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore TraiUWaterline Project Cherry Pond Delineation Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project November 2012 Prepared for: North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B West Patison Street Port Hadlock,WA 98339 r{ '\\ 7. 1 x \ ..j Mme/ 1 yj. � 11'x!,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,..,„„,„„,,,,.„.„.„...4,4,„4,.,„,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„„,..„..a,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.- ,,,„4„,„,,,,,,,,-,, `4."4-'-'4'''--t'O.,,-.'- ,,,,,:_A--„,-„,,,_,..._:_,..,„.„... „.. z,,, 856 50th Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 360 385-6432 dixie@cablespeed.com L 7 - d Of Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project Cherry Pond Delineation Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project November 2012 Table of Contents Introduction Wetland Delineation Methodology Findings Maynard Nearshore Project, Cherry Pond Soils Vegetation Hydrology Wetland Categorization and Buffer Requirements Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek Salmon Creek Snow Creek Estuary and Pond Soils Vegetation Hydrology Wetland Categorization for Snow Creek Estuary and Pond Summary Limitations Lt- r'ci.Je of Appendices Sheet #1 Location of Projects, Soils, and Critical Area Sheet #2 Wetland Boundary Map, Cherry Pond Sheet #2 Snow and Salmon Creek Buffers Sheet #3 Snow Creek Estuary Salt Marsh and Pond Boundary Sheet #4 Photographs of Cherry Pond, Snow and Salmon Creek Buffers Sheet #5 Photographs of Snow Creek Estuary and Snow Creek Estuary Pond Plants Identified at Cherry Pond, Snow Creek Estuary, Streamside Buffers Applied Methodology Cherry Pond Wetland Rating Field Data Form Data Forms,Routine Determination,WA State Wetland Delineation Manual Snow Creek Estuary and Pond Wetland Rating Field Data Form Data Forms,Routine Determination,WA State Wetland Delineation Manual References • Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project Cherry Pond Delineation Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project LC.G November 2012 Page Introduction Olympic Wetland Resources has been authorized by Kevin Long, Project Manager,North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC)to perform a Critical Area Review of areas associated with the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project. The focus of the critical area study includes: the Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project(Cherry Pond and the waterline crossings for Snow and Salmon Creek), and the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project(including Snow Creek Estuary Pond). These projects are part of a larger ongoing restoration of Discovery Bay that started in early 2000. Cherry Pond is located southeast of Highway 101 and will be part of an intertidal enhancement of over 8 acres. This phased restoration will include the removal of the railroad trestle and railroad grade, and enhancement of intertidal areas. Cherry Pond is downslope from the proposed waterline upgrade and the future extension of the Discovery Trail. The waterline will pass through the buffers of Snow and Salmon Creek. The waterlines will be suspended on 4-foot-wide bridges across the creeks and will fall within the Department of Transportation right-of—way. The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project is part of an ongoing and larger salmon enhancement project within lower Discovery Bay. The focus of the critical area study includes the outlet for Snow Creek into the estuary which was historically dredged and the delineation of Snow Creek Estuary Pond. This pond is not fed by Snow Creek but empties directly into the estuary. This restoration proposal includes the removal of a railroad grade, elevation changes, and restoration of over 25 acres of estuary. Additional resources were consulted prior to field work for this project: • Jefferson County Critical Areas Map(internet) • Aerial Photographs(Soil maps pre-1975 and 1994,2000,2005 and 2006, 2009, 2011 (internet) • Jefferson County Unified Development Code (18.22 Critical Areas revised March 2008) and 18.25 Shoreline Master Program (under revision) • Soil Survey of Jefferson County,U.S. Soil Conservation Service 1975, inventory 2005 (internet) • Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (2011 update) • National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9,2011 update) • Review of Discovery Bay Restoration Project and Maps(NOSC) • Inventory of Plant Species Discovery Bay Salt Marsh,Fred and Ann Weinmann(11/2009) Sheet #1 in the Appendix includes site location, soils, critical area map and an aerial view of Discovery Bay with location of individual critical areas assessed within this report. A comprehensive description of the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project, including engineering, project phases, and elevations,will be provided by NOSC. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 1 November 2012 Wetland Delineation Methodology `. Fieldwork to determine the actual wetland boundaries was conducted according to methodology outlined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Department of Ecology,Publication #96-94,or as amended)and in compliance to the Jefferson County UDC Critical Areas (18.22 revised March 2008). Wetlands and streams were categorized according to the 2004 DOE rating system for Western Washington(2nd edition Publication 04-06-025). A comprehensive description of methodology used to conduct this delineation and categorization is included in the Appendix. All field data,photographs, US Army Corps of Engineers data forms, and DOE data forms for all critical areas are included in the Appendix. Findings Maynard Nearshore Project, Cherry Pond Cherry Pond falls within a flat man-made swale at the toe of the slope east of HWY 101. It was once part of the estuary at lower Discovery Bay but was bound on the east by the railroad grade berm built in 1917. The pond, including associated wetlands, is approximately 500 feet long and 30 to 40 feet wide. The majority of the site has been historically impacted and altered with fill and dredging for the railroad berm and veneer peeling mill located at the south end of the pond. The water line upgrade and the future Discovery Trail are proposed to fall within the right-of-ways of HWY 101 owned by WSDOT. Cherry Pond area is owned by Department of Fish and Wildlife, and land use is planned for conservation and nearshore restoration. The delineation at Cherry Pond was conducted on November 6, 2012 following a seasonally dry summer. The perimeter of the pond was flagged with orange flagging with the alphanumeric codes A-1 through A-16. The shoreline of the pond varied from an abrupt upland/wetland edge to gradual slopes. Within these swales wetland plant species were dominant,hydric soils present,and surface hydrology observed. A seasonal stream flows into the northeast end of Cherry Pond and is approximately 5 inches deep and 32 inches wide. Where the stream empties into the pond there is a 16-inch overflow pipe and an elevated 24-inch culvert. Water was flowing out of the pond through the overflow but water levels were not high enough to reach the culvert. This stream is not indicated on the Jefferson County Critical Areas map and has no direct connection to Discovery Bay and therefore is not fish-bearing. Field findings for soils, vegetation, and hydrology are summarized below. Sheet#2 in the Appendix indicates the wetland edge as measured in the field,the stream location, and Data Point(DP) locations. All points are recorded by GPS points taken by NOSC (11/25/2012). Photographs of the site are included on Sheet#4. Soils Soils are highly altered around Cherry Pond with the construction of the railroad bed, mill and highway, and they are mapped as Cu Cut and fill. On adjacent properties soils are mapped as HuC Hoypus gravelly loamy sand. Soils identified at DP#1 and#2 consist of fill from the construction of the railroad bed and contain large rocks within a mixed matrix of sand and gravel. Soils in the low-lying areas have developed distinct hydric indicators including a reduced matrix and depleted dark surfaces (DP#3 and #6). Colors were identified using the Munsel Color Chart and classified using the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (7.0, 2010). Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 2 November 2012 Vegetation The majority of vegetation identified along the eastern edge of the pond is non-native invasive species including English hawthorn, Scot's broom,thistle, Himalayan blackberry, and reed canarygrass. The tree layer surrounding the remainder of the pond is a mixture of Douglas fir, red alder, cottonwood, and two species of willow (Scouler's and Pacific willow). Understory is still dominated by Himalayan blackberry; however salmonberry, oceanspray,Nootka rose, and Oregon grape are also present. The herb layer contains both native and non-native species including reed canarygrass, orchard grass, quack grass horsetail, and sword fern. A comprehensive list of vegetation identified on site can be found in the Appendix. Hydrology Hydrology supporting Cherry Pond is from upslope streams that may originate from groundwater springs. The main stream flowing into the pond is flowing out directly to Discovery Bay through a 16" cement bathtub-like outlet. The stream is not shown on the Critical Areas map but it is a non-fish- bearing stream since there is currently no direct connection to Discovery Bay. Soil,vegetation,and hydrology data summary for Cherry Pond Cherry Pond Category II Wetland 52 Points Soils Hydrology Dominant Plants Wetland DP#1 10YR4/3 None Scot's broom,Himalayan blackberry,thistle No DP#2 10YR4/2 2"Inundation Scot's broom,Himalayan blackberry,alder Yes 10YR3/2& 10YR3/1 redox DP#3 depletions Soils saturated Willow,alder,buttercup,horsetail Yes DP#4 10YR2/1 rocks None Dou las fir,alder,Oregon grape,sword fern No DP#5 10YR3/3& 10YR 3/1 8"below surface Willows,salmonberry,horsetail Yes DP#6 10YR3/3 rocky None Alder,Douglas fir,nettles,blackberries No Wetland Categorization and Buffer Requirements Cherry Pond was classified as a Category II wetland using the Washington State Wetland Rating Field Data(2004). The wetland received a total of 52 points; 22 points for Water Quality Function, 10 points for Water Hydrologic Functions and 20 points for Habitat Functions. Category II wetlands will have buffers that vary from 50 to 150 feet according to land use applications. Since this project is designated for restoration these buffers may not apply. The DOE rating form is included in the Appendix. Snow and Salmon Creek Crossing Snow Creek is listed as a Type "S" Shoreline Stream, and Salmon Creek is listed as a Type "F" Fish Bearing Stream on the Jefferson Critical Areas Map. Buffers for both"S" and"F" streams are 150 feet according to Jefferson County Critical Areas UDC (18.22.270(1). The waterline proposed by the project will be directionally bored beneath the creeks. The waterline project has been funded by restoration funders including Salmon Recovery Funding Board, USFWS National Coastal Wetland Grants, and NOAA Fish America Foundation. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 3 November 2012 gk „Is Y 6 Included in the Appendix is the location of the proposed path of the waterllwi°ne—crossing through the buffers (Sheet#2), and photographs of buffers for both Snow and Salmon Creek(Sheet#4). Refer to Waterline and Oly Discovery Trail Plansets included in the JARPA application. Snow Creek The proposed location waterline bore beneath Snow Creek is southwest of HWY 101 and adjacent to Fat Smitty's restaurant to the north and a residential driveway to the south. The 150-foot buffers on both sides of Snow Creek are highly impacted. Vegetation only covers about 40 feet north and 60 feet south of the total 150-foot buffers. Along the stream bed there are large alders, but the remainder of the shrub and herb layer consists of Himalayan blackberries and reed canarygrass. The buffer impacts are calculated at 1,000 square feet(10' X 100') for directional drilling machinery work areas. Salmon Creek The proposed location for the waterline bore beneath Salmon Creek is east of HWY 101. The 150-foot buffer was measured from the high water mark during a high tide since this portion of the stream is affected by tidal influence. Both sides of the buffer are vegetated with native and non-native species. Himalayan blackberries are the dominant species for the first 80 feet on both sides of the stream buffer. Within the blackberry hedge also identified were alder, elderberry, Douglas fir,Nootka rose, salmonberry, and sword fern. The buffer's impacts are calculated at 3,000 square feet(10' X 300') for directional drilling machinery work areas. Snow Creek Estuary and Pond Snow Creek Estuary Restoration includes the removal of a railroad grade and elevation alterations within the estuary. The salt marsh mosaics have been clearly mapped by Cardo Entrix as low, high and middle salt marsh and are outside this study. The critical areas analysis defined the salt marsh/upland wetland edge along Snow Creek, examined the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM), and delineated a pond within the Snow Creek Estuary. Both Snow Creek and the stream that feeds the pond flow beneath SR 20 east of the intersection of HWY 101. Sheet#3 indicates field findings of the delineated wetland edge of the pond and salt marsh edge. Photographs of the site are included in the Appendix on Sheet#5. Snow Creek Estuary Field work was conducted on November 15, 2006. The Snow Creek channel has been significantly altered from the construction of the railroad berm and dredging of Snow Creek. Imported and mounded soils support little habitat value where non-native plant species thrive. The majority of lower Discovery Bay, north of the railroad berm, will qualify as wetland with the exception of the imported, dredged, and mounded soil. Freshwater wetlands with less salt tolerance were identified adjacent to Snow Creek and around the pond. Field findings indicate hydric soils, hydrology, and hydrophitic vegetation in these areas. There is a clear transition zone from salt marsh wetland to a wetland dominated by fresh water. Within the high salt marsh, pickleweed, saltgrass, mud rush, and saltmarsh aster were dominant. Alders, willows and reedcanary grass are less salt tolerant and clearly defined the fresh water wetland edge. Scot's broom and thistle were dominant species on the mounded hummocks within the estuary and adjacent to the railroad bed, and had no wetland indicators. The OHWM is well defined and mapped by CARDNO Entrix for NOSC, and within the scope of this project the findings are correct. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 4 November 2012 • gg 0-7771 Snow Creek Estuary Pond This small freshwater pond was delineated on November 13, 2012. This pond and associated wetlands were flagged with orange wetland flagging(EP#1 through EP#8). Snow Creek Pond and associated wetlands lie south of the railroad bed and are most likely the result of the elevated railroad berm. A small stream was flowing into this pond from upslope areas to the south and originates as a groundwater spring channel. The outflow was beneath the railroad bed under a bridge and entered the estuary east of the main tributary of Snow Creek. This separate channel can be seen in aerial photographs included in the Appendix. Soils Soils within Snow Creek Pond and associated buffers are mapped as Lu Lummi silt loam, although the majority of soil has been historically altered. Lummi soil types are not included on the hydric soil list, but over time the soils that have been saturated will form hydric conditions. Soils within the wetland at DP #1 clearly showed depletion from saturation and formed a distinct dark brown loam layer over a very dark gray clay layer. The soils within DP#2 consisted mostly of fill with large rocks and gravel. Vegetation The slopes surrounding Snow Creek Pond were dominated by invasive species including Himalayan blackberry, Scot's broom, and thistle. Within the low flat areas and within the wetland, native species were identified and included Lyngby's sedge, Pacific silverweed, and tufted hairgrass. Hydrology Hydrology clearly defines the wetland/upland edge around Snow Creek Pond. Soils were saturated and ponded water was observed within the pond and along shallow swales of the perimeter. This pond has a small perennial stream flowing in at the south end and leaving at the north end towards Snow Creek Estuary. According to NOSC this is a groundwater spring channel and not a tributary of Snow Creek. Hydrology was observed as ponding and surface saturation within the low swales around portions of the perimeter. Soil,vegetation,and hydrology data summary Snow Creek Estuary Pond Category II Wetland 26 Points Soils Hydrology Plants Wetland DP#1 10YR2/2&Gleyl 6/10Y Surface Pacific silverweed,Lyngby sedge,Redtop,Velvet grass Yes DP#2 I0YR2/2 None Scot's broom,Himalayan blackberry No Wetland Categorization for Snow Creek Estuary Pond Snow Creek Estuary Pond was categorized as part of the entire Snow Creek Estuary since there is a direct hydrological connection between the pond and the estuary. Snow Creek Estuary Pond is part of a larger Category I wetland based on the Special Characteristics (Estuary) in the DOE rating form, which is included in the Appendix. Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 5 November 2012 ti)�:4e age`- Summary Jefferson County Department of Community Development has requested a critical areas review for the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project. This report addresses the critical areas within this restoration project and is consistent with the Jefferson County Code Section 18.22 Wetlands and 18.25 Shoreline. The report evaluates the following critical areas: • The Maynard Nearshore Restoration Trail/Waterline Project which includes the delineation and categorization of Cherry Pond. • Two stream crossings and buffer analysis (Snow and Salmon Creek). • The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project which includes the review of critical areas within the delineation and categorization of Snow Creek Pond, the flagging of the east and west sides of the salt marsh edge along Snow Creek, and the examination of the OHWM. Cherry Pond is a Category II wetland due to proximity to higher quality habitats (52 total points). This pond will be returned to original elevation and is part of a larger restoration project included in the Maynard Nearshore Restoration Project restoration of over 8 acres. Snow and Salmon Creek waterline crossing will pass through the 150' buffers of both creeks since they are rated as "S" Shoreline and"F" Fish-Bearing streams consecutively. Currently both buffers are highly impacted and consist of mostly non-native vegetation. Snow Creek buffers are reduced by more than half on both sides by driveways and buildings. Salmon Creek buffers have a dense shrub layer but consist primarily of a hedge of Himalayan blackberries. Snow Creek Estuary and Snow Creek Estuary Pond are rated as one system due to the hydrological connection and receive a Category I rating(DOE Rating Special Characteristics, Estuary) due to the combination of high quality salmon habitat and the overall function of the estuary. Snow Creek has been dredged and the railroad berm has altered critical area, although the majority of the estuary is within salt marsh and freshwater wetland and of high habitat value. These critical areas are included in the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project of over 26 acres. Limitations The final authority over approval of this Critical Areas Review, Wetland Delineation, Stream Typing, and Buffer Assessment will be Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Jurisdictional authority over all wetlands and streams rests with the local, state and federal agencies. If there are further questions or planning requirements for this project, please do not hesitate to call. Dixie Llewellin Principal Biologist Olympic Wetland Resources Certified for Wetland Delineation, WTI, June 1995 Certified for Wetland Rating and Soil Analysis DOE,2007,2012 Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Report File#2012-1002 6 November 2012 Appendices Sheet #1 Location of Projects, Soils, and Critical Area Sheet #2 Wetland Boundary Map, Cherry Pond Sheet #2 Snow and Salmon Creek Buffers Sheet #3 Snow Creek Estuary Salt Marsh and Pond Boundary Sheet #4 Photographs of Cherry Pond, Snow and Salmon Creek Buffers Sheet #5 Photographs of Snow Creek Estuary and Snow Creek Estuary Pond Plants Identified at Cherry Pond, Snow Creek Estuary, Streamside Buffers Applied Methodology Cherry Pond Wetland Rating Field Data Form Data Forms,Routine Determination,WA State Wetland Delineation Manual Snow Creek Estuary and Pond Wetland Rating Field Data Form Data Forms,Routine Determination,WA State Wetland Delineation Manual References i Pim # (9 Title: Page ), Scale: Sheet Location of Projects Olympic Wetland Resources Soils, and Critical Areas As In ica e 856 50th Street Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Date: ? Port Townsend,WA 98368 #1 ' November 2012 360 385-6432 Client: North Olympic Salmon Coalition dixie @cablespeed.com 205 B Patison Street Job#: Port Hadlock,WA 98339 2012-1002 S. / S24 T29N R2W TOPO1 map printed on 05/08/02 from"Puget.tpo"and"Untitled.tpg" 122°42'00"W 122°33'00"W WG584122°17'00"W /Ia_y -il z nn-want., `:a,. ,'i c.sw \ Q r✓r ' r x w. \15.i C' 1 _ z o'a ;".1.° 1 . 1— A• A.� +IR o W 0 ar ort;r7 W11 not`.Graenhantc 4. l o a ���iii I re•* °W 7 \,�, \ '8a_ �l da ', '� t 120 ('f` , b" 1 z --' hi,aalat' ° t "■aid., Free •. t o• ,, Vele"CL —Pint ,.., Uater. •y, . t l, z z qf, � cte / r I k\44..,1-4! . ' // kv�'a1 I ,,�77�,_�y(.+,� Shle-),,1 ,rorc Mein / ,-di "T� ` ►I ra..'y1 \ion h O Q i z a .a.°. , . t ' _ z 4 b v r \v 1 '' // °fan •'-)'• ° rl°i , _f-YO'-•: ,, a r 01:., /( r) m t 1' ,,r / 122°42'00"W 122°33'00"W WGS84122°17'00" a._-, .r TN* MN 0 5 10 15 miles i ,19 I 0 5 l0 15 20 25 km / Panted from TOPOI 51999 Wildflower Prodertioss(mew tom om ' Cherry Pond ,s Salmon Creek Crossing �f �, , Snow Creek Crossing - �' ' 1 1 ., 3 ..mai,...van Cam CerrY.Se o.an > '., . ' Snow Creek Estuary Pond Legend Towns '"""1....., .b. C°u n1y 5'uai R sear°°°'"' Soil Types ""°' JC Roads .� ONR Streams Cu Cut and Fill ,••••••••,,, N F Fan NAINIM Lu Lummi silt loam N-Naat-Ftsn Iiatreal n am••:me /'l avu` , of elp-Non dalr eloSnal Peronnul ji \^ +,,. �. -._ ,../ Ns Nan-tan klansa Seasonal `^-... awe +' .rw ve �` S-1nwn1°rvae STarelme roc,:.^,,,,,.. .>v.. .v..,., „n LFA-Fish Iy. "*. Jefferson County Critical Areas Map Green Indicates Wetlands w g °'" _. NWI Categorization � E2AB/USN T'tle: Scale: Sheet Wetland Boundary Map; "' . Olympic Wetland Resources Cherry Pond, Snow and Salmon Creek Buffers As Indicated ., 856 50th Street Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Date: #2 lief' ' . I 360 Port Townsend,WA98368 Client: North Olympic Salmon Coalition November 2012 i, dixie @cablespeed.com 205 B Patison St Job#: Port Hadlock,WA 98339 2012-1002 Base Map, GPS Points taken by NOSC S24 T29N R2W Wetland Boundary Cherry Pond e �°, Catego_ryII We land • • Page of� , ©� —150'Salmon Creek Buffer it, • " • 150' Snow Creek Buffer "iils:/,'... ,t4'd'ie'''''.; ' , .1° 410/0 Jas k i ;.; I }} , \I V 1111111170? '''''i6, i (Oft,-., I 1 sha vanEnC.,......c—v Cant....s. 362' Paged ta Title: Scale: Sheet Olympic Wetland Resources Snow Creek Estuary Salt Marsh Edge y As Indicated and Pond Boundary e.. 856 50th Street Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Date: Port Townsend,WA 98368 #3 360 3856432 Client: North Olympic Salmon Coalition November 2012 dixie @cablespeed.com 205 B Patison Street Job#: Port Hadlock,WA 98339 2012-1002 Base Map From Google Earth, GPS Points to be taken by NOSC S23T29N R2W • • • • c • • • • er e Flagging Along the West(El through E6) and East(E1A through E8A) Defines the Salt Marsh from the Upland Wetland/and the Mounded Upland ro : ! P L T Title: Scale: Sheet Photographs of CIS, and . Of ��� Olympic Wetland Resources Snow and Salmon Cre �Bu .,is ��' s Indicated 856 50th Street Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Date: #4 t d Port Townsend,WA 98368 November 2012 ' 360 385-6432 Client: North Olympic Salmon Coalition dixie @cablespeed.com 205 B Patison Street Job#: Port Hadlock,WA 98339 2012-1002 I� S24 T29N R2W . , „„ lik,,,,, a Cherry Pond(North End Data Point#1) Cherry Pond(South Eti nd Data Point#9) �1 . , , Snow Creek Buffer (South Side) Snow Creek Buffer (North Side) .x , ..., ::,.: s mss \ y � \ Salmon Creek Buffer (North Side) Salmon Creek Buffer (South Side) P Title: Scale: Sheet Photographs of Snow Creek Estuary and ti"' Olympic WetlandResources As Indicated VSnow Creek Estuary Pond 856 50th Street Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Date: ` Port Townsend,WA 98368 #5 360385.6432 Client: North Olympic Salmon Coalition November 2012 , dixie @cablespeed.com 205 B Patison Street ■ Job#: Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2012-1002 S24 T29N R2W LC !TT AP # (a Page 0-17—g":3- ---lifE Estuary,Salt Marsh and Wetlands(Looking North) it t' w .., .,,,t + - + .V at-+a b..,, .tea + . ,_.. k;N".,i:4M 't .v.+, Low Marsh Vegetation and Transition Zone Estuary Pond(North End Data Point#2) L ` 'rM 'ege Applied Methodology Jefferson County Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual Fieldwork to determine the actual wetland boundaries was conducted according to the methodology outlined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Department of Ecology,March 1997, #96-94 or as amended). Chapter 173-22 of the Washington Administrative Code requires that all wetlands within the State of Washington be delineated using this manual. All wetlands within Jefferson County are regulated according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code(Critical Areas 18.22,revised March 2008). The methodology outlined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual requires examination of three parameters for a positive wetland determination:hydric soils,hydrophytic vegetation,and hydrology. For an area to qualify as a jurisdictional wetland it must have a positive indicator from all three parameters. All wetlands identified using this methodology may be federally regulated, regardless of size. Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion: Wetland plant species must,under normal circumstances,constitute greater than 50%of the total vegetation present to meet the qualification as a site dominated by hydrophytic vegetation. Dominance of plant species is determined by calculating actual aerial cover within a 30-foot radius for trees and woody vines, and a 5-foot radius for herbs and saplings/shrubs at each data point. Commonly occurring plant species have been rated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9 updated 2011)as to their frequency of occurrence in wetlands and non- wetlands. During the fieldwork, each species was recorded and given a rating based on indicator status and percent cover. Hydrophytic Soil Criterion: A hydric soil is a soil that forms under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding lasting long enough during the growing season to result in an anaerobic upper layer(USDA-NRCS 1995). Hydric soils favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. The indicators for this type of soil include low chroma,depletions, gleying,and high organic content within the soil immediately below the A-horizon or 10 inches(whichever is shallower). Holes were dug on the site and soil colors(including value and chroma)were recorded in the top 16 inches. Soil colors were analyzed using the Munsell Soil Color Charts (1992)and analyzed using the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils of the United States (Version 7.0, 2010). Wetland Hydrology Criteria: Wetland hydrology is defined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual as "areas which are seasonally inundated and/or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days"at least 12.5%of the growing season(20 days out of 258 days). For most of Western Washington at low elevations,the mesic growing season of March 1 to October 31 has been considered a good rule. The growing season has also been defined when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41 degrees F). Indicators of hydrology may include, but are not necessarily limited to,ponded water, drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition,historic records,water-stained leaves,cracking of the soil surface,oxidized root channels,and/or sediment deposits. Visual observation of soil saturation requires digging a soil pit to a depth of 16 inches. If the water table is found within the soil test pit within 12 inches of the soil surface,one can assume that soil saturation occurs to the surface. Positive signs of hydrology are often absent during the summer and fall months but can be inferred if there are positive indicators of hydric soil and hydrophytic vegetation. Categorization Wetland categorization was determined using the Washington State Department of Ecology(DOE) Wetland Rating System Revised (Ecology Publication#04-06-025,August 2004), according to type and category of wetland. The wetland is assigned a numerical value for water quality function,hydrologic function, and habitat function. The total score determines the category of wetland. Wetlands are rated as entire systems and quite often exceed project boundaries. Ratings range from Category Ito Category IV. Buffers are assigned according to intensity of land use for specific parcel size using final numeric scores. Category I indicates the highest quality wetlands. These are not replaceable and therefore receive the largest buffer and highest protection. Determining Wetland Edges Wetland edges were determined by establishing pairs of data points. One was within the wetland which contained positive indicators of all three of the wetland requirements: soils,hydrology,and vegetation, and the other data point was outside the wetland,where one or all of the requirements were not present. The wetland edge was flagged between the pairs of points at intervals of 20 to 40 feet. Wetland Delineation Methodology Plant Community Assessment: At each data point the dominant plant species within the tree, shrub, and herb stratums were identified according to Flora of the Pacific Northwest(Hitchcock and Cronquist, 1973) and recorded. The estimated percent aerial cover and the indicator status were also recorded. It was then determined whether the hydrophytic vegetation criteria were met. When 50%or greater of the dominant species have an indicator status of OBL (Obligate wetland species), FACW (Facultative-wet wetland species), or FAC (Facultative wetland species), the vegetation is considered hydrophytic. Outside the wetland, upland species have an indicator status of FACU (Facultative upland species), UPL (Obligate upland species), and NI (No indicator status). Characterization of Soils: At each data point, a hole 16 to 18 inches in depth was dug. Existing perk holes were examined when present. Soil characteristics (matrix color,presence of depletion,reduced matrix, concentrations, etc.)were examined and recorded. It was then determined whether the hydric soil criterion was met. Determination of Hydrology Criterion: At each data point the presence of ponding, depth of water within the soil test pits, soil saturation, drainage patterns, or other hydrological field indicators were recorded. It was then determined whether the wetland hydrology criterion was met. Seasonal wetlands that are dry during the summer months were analyzed using historical maps and evaluating the soils and plant communities. NOSC Plant List for Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project, Cri, cal Areas j Pau?_ .,..':;: (D-- Cherry SC Estuary Salmon Snow � �°° Pond &Pond Creek Creek Scientific Name Common name Status Layer X X Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple FACU Tree X Achillea millefolium Yarrow NI Herb X X X Agrostis capillaris(A.tenuis) Colonial bentgrass FAC Grass X X X X Alnus rubra Alder FAC Tree X Arbutus menziesii Madrona NI Tree X Aster subspicatus Douglas aster FACW Herb X Athyrium filix femina Lady fern FAC Herb X Atriplex patula Fat-hen saltbrush FACW Herb X Berberis nervosa Dull Oregon grape FACU Shrub X X Carex lyngbyei Lyngby's sedge OBL Sedge X Chenopodium album Lambsquarters NI Herb X Cichorium intybus Chicory NI Herb X X Circium arvense Canada thistle FACU+ Herb X Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle FACU Herb X Crataegus dougliasii Douglas'hawthorn FAC Shrub X X X Crataegus momogyna Common hawthorn NI Shrub X X Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom NI Shrub X X Dactylis glomerata Orchard-grass FACU Grass X Dipsacus sylvestris Teasel NI Herb X Distichlis spicata Seashore saltgrass FAC+ Grass X Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed NI Herb X Epilobium ciciatum Watson willowherb FACW- Herb X X X Equisetum arvense Common horsetail FAC Herb X Equisetum telmateia Giant horsetail FACW Herb X X Festuca arundinacea Tall fescue FAC- Grass X Galium sp. Bedstraw Herb X Gaultheria shallon Salal FACU Shrub X Hedera helix Ivy Shrub X Holcus lanatus Velvetgrass FAC Grass X Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray NI Shrub X Ilex sp. Holly NI Shrub X X Juncus effusus Soft rush FACW Rush X Juncus gerardii Mud rush FACW+ Rush X Oemleria cerasiformis Indian-plum FACU Shrub X X X X Phalaris arundinacea Canarygrass FACW Grass X X Plantago lanceolata English plantain FAC Herb X X X Polystichum munitum Sword fern FACU Fern X Populus balsamifera Black cottonwood FAC Tree X Potamogenton natans Floating leaf pondweed OBL Herb X Potentilla anserina Pacific silverweed OBL Herb X Prunus emarginata var mollis Bitter cherry FACU Tree X X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir FACU Tree X X Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup FACW Herb X X X Rosa nutkana Nootka rose FAC Shrub X X X X Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry FACU Shrub X X Rubus leucodermis Western blackcap Shrub X Rubus parviflorus Thimbleberry NI Shrub Page 1 9 1 F''' E. •,,�R iff NOSC RFOge t �{l X X Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry FAC+ Shrub X Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry FACU Shrub X X Rumux crispus Curly dock FACW Herb X Salicornia virginica Pickleweed OBL Herb X Salix lucida var. lasiandra Pacific willow FACW+ Shrub X Salix scouleriana Scouler willow FAC Tree X X Sambucus racemosa Elderberry FACU Shrub X Senecio jacobaea Tansy ragwort FACU Herb X X Solanum dulcamara Climbing nightshade FAC+ Herb X X Spiraea douglasii Hardhack FACW Shrub X Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FACU Shrub X Tolmiea menzeisii Piggy-back plant FAC Herb X Triglochin maritima Seaside arrowgrass OBL Herb X X Typha latifolia Cattail OBL Herb Page 2 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pondcity/county: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP# 1 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcegection,Township,Range: S24 T29N R2W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): COnCaVe Slope(%): 0 tO 10% Subregion(LRR):Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 4799 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: Nearby E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yeses No X Remarks: L� n 4 VI it VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. ".. --- "''v., Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 50 Y FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2.Crataegus monogyna 20 N N/A Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 70 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 16.66% (NB) Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Rubus discolor 75 Y FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. CVtISUS scoparius 25 N FACU N/A 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2= FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= 100 =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1.Elytrigia repens 6_ N FAC- Column Totals: (A) (B) 2.Agrostis capillaris 25 N FAC Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No Y %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4" 10 Y/R 4/3 SL Area near RR grade 4"-16" 10Y/R 4/3 Sandy with Large Rocks 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more reauired) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: This Data Point is along the relic railroad bed and consists of fill. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pond city/County: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP#2 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcegection,Township,Range: S24 T29N R2W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR):Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 4799 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: Nearby E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? LY 's ,X`"`; "f`pp Remarks: . p. 71- VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 50 Y FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2.Crataegus monogyna 20 N N/A Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 66% C 70 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) 1. Rubus discolor 75 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Cytisus scoparius 25 N FACU N/A Total%Cover of: Multiply by. 3. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= 100 =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1.Elytrigia repens 60 N FAC- Column Totals: (A) (B) 2.Agrostis capillaris 25 N FAC Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 55.3.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 Remarks: Data Point#2 Is on the edge of Cherry Pond and soils are saturated at the abrupt edge. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6" 10Y/R 4/2 SL on slope to pond 6"-16" 10Y/R 4/3 SL with 5" Rocks Filled with water W 7 If 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Hydric soil can only be assumed since it was saturated and within a few inches of ponded water. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) X Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) _X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _X_ Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): top Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Surface Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Top Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Data Point#2 is along the slope to Cherry Pond and deep ponding within 10". US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pondcity/county: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP#3 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourceeection,Township,Range: S24 T29N R2W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR):Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 4799 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: Nearby E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area,,, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No withi.awetlanti? Yes X No Remarks: .f VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 50 Y FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 6 XX (A) 2.Salix scouleriana 40 Y FAC 3 Salix lucida 10 N FACW Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 1000/0 70 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: ' X(A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) 1. Alnus rubra 30 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = 3. FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. 100 =Total Cover FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1.Elytrigia repens 60 N FAC- Column Totals: (A) (B) 2.Ranunculus repens 45 Y FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 Remarks: Data Point#2 Is on the edge of Cherry Pond and soils are saturated at the abrupt edge. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6" 10Y/R 4/2 SL on slope to pond 6"-16" 10Y/R 4/3 ._ . ..., SL with 5" Rocks Filled with water 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: WiIfiXXX11C rX9C CXYs1(116MIXAMAXIXAWAGrai'!(telfUN JIt4WaXiI K:XXXXICtfiNkt&MtifetX Hydric soils present. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) X Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) _X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) .X Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): top Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Surface Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Top Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Data Point#3 is at the flat end of the wetland and near in stream flowing into the pond. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pondcity/County: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP# 11 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcesection,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 47.99 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X fs the SampledArJ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a etland? Yes No X Y gY ,t,°: Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 60 FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Alnus rubra 30 FAC Total Number of Dominant 0 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. 90% =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species 0 SaDling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (NB) 1. Berberis nervosa 40 FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. Rubus ursinus 30 FACU 3. Rubus armeniacus 20 FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= 900/0=Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5= 1. Polystichum minitum 85 FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ilex sp. 10 N/I Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. - Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. - _- _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 950/0p Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No X %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6" 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam 6-16" 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam with Large rocks 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: There are no secondary wetland soil indicators. Soils were dry and may consist of some fill. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one reauired:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more reauired) Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pond city/county: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP#5 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland ResourceSection,Township,Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 47.99 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the ampled Area` , S Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No yfithin a Wetland?/„ Yes X No Remarks: (�/ --' ,'., ,_..7 VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Salix Scouleriana �8 yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A) 2. Salix lucida 20 FACW+ Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species o 100 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100/o (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Rubus spectabilis 90 yes FAC+ Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = 3. FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. 90 FACU species x 4= =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 50 yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Equisetum arvense 40 FAC Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 553.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting $ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9 _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-5" 10YR 4/1 45 10YR 4/6 C M SL 5-10" 10YR 3/1 SL fk i. 4;1, ,Aa 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils were saturated to 9" below the surface...did not get soil color below that level. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) X Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, X High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) X Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): nearby Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 9" below Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site:Maynard Nearshore Restoration. Cherry Pond city/county: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP#6 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcesection,Township,Range: Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 47.99 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CU Cut and Fill Land NWI classification: E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is he Sampled• rrea Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X .i_ within a Wetland? Yes No X Remarks: / VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover p Secies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuoa menziesii 60 yes FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Alnus rubura 35 FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species o 95/0 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 66% (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. None Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = 3. FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5. FACU species x 4= =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1. Urtica dioica 75 yes FAC+ Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. -- _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting $ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9 _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation X =Total Cover Present? Yes No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The dominant species in mature trees will not grow in wetlands. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 3/3 gravel with SL 9-16 10YR 3/3 Large rock and fill 5 e f( v >� 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Data Point#6 is at the base of the fill for Highway 101. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 t 7,P Snow Creek DOE Rating Form November 2012 CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS, Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland,'t category earri 00eria that ., t to t , rim CoallotY h appropriate J' let.„, Sc IA Estuarine wetlands(seep. 86) Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands'? X The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO— SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Cat.I Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES=Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre it a»P and me s at least two of the following three conditions? YES =Category I NO=Category I1 Cat. I X-The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling, Cat. II cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating(I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a UII Category I. Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. —At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of X shrub, forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least 2 of the following features:tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. This estuary is rated as an entire system which includes Salmon Creek, Snow Creek, and Snow Creek Pond, along with several other fresh water streams. Although it has been historically altered, the system is rated as a whole, is relatively undisturbed and contains a high function and habitat value. Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 18 August 2004 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Snow Creek Estuary, Snow Creek Pond City/County: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP# 1 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcegection,Township,Range: S23 tf29N R2W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 47.99 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Lu Lummi silt loam NWI classification: E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation X ,Soil X ,or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetla d?: Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No I' �_ Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. None That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' ) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Holcus lanatus 10 FAC OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2= 5. FAC species x 3= FACU species x 4= =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1. Potentilla anserina 60 yes OBL Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Carex lyngbyei 20 yes OBL 3. Holcus lanatus 10 FAC Prevalence Index =B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. 4-Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4" 10YR 3/2 SL Saturated 4-6" 3/N 30 10YR 4/6 20 C M Clay Under water 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils had a distinct clay layer at 4 inches. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) X Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) X Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) X Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): surface Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): surface Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 4" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: DP#1 is on shallow end of Snow Creek Pond near the outflow. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Snow Creek Estuary, Snow Creek Pond City/County: Jefferson Sampling Date: 11/06/12 Applicant/Owner: North Olympic Salmon Coalition State: WA Sampling Point: DP#2 Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin Olympic Wetland Resourcegection,Township,Range: S23 t 29N R2W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0 to 10% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forest/Coastal Lat: 47.99 Long: 122.89 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Lu Lummi silt loam NWI classification: E2AB/USN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation X ,Soil X ,or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes Remarks: f, Historically the site has been excavated and soils added for the railroad bed. n Ma� VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species o =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 330/0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Cytisus scoparius 80 yes N/I 2. Rubus armeniacus 20 N/I Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2= 5. FAC species x 3= FACU species x 4= 100 =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' ) UPL species x 5= 1. Agrostis gigantea 20 FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2 Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No X %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4" 10YR 4/2 gravel with small rocks XX 4-16'/2 90 10YR 4/6 10YR 4/6 5%C rocky with large rocks Dm— 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: This soil test pit was dug at the base of the railroad berm. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Surface Water(A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except _ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, _ High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A,and 4B) _ Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(B11) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) Water Marks(B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 n References Buckingham, et al., 1995. Flora of the Olympic Peninsula. Northwest Interpretive Association and the Washington Native Plant Society, Seattle, Wash. Cooke, Sarah Spear, 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Wash. Cowardin, L.M.V. Carter, F.C.Goblet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetland and Deep Water Habitats of the U.S. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Hitchcock and Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1987. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. July 1994 update. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Jefferson County Unified Development Code. March 2008. Leonard, William P., 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Series. MacBeth, Div. of Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., 1992. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Mitsch and Gosselink, 1993. Wetlands. Pojar, Mackinnon, 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Reed, Porter, 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands,Region 9. 2011 update. Washington State Department of Ecology, April 2004. Guidance on Wetland Mitigation in Washington State. Washington State Department of Ecology, March 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, #96-94. Washington State Department of Ecology,August 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington,Revised#04-06-025. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Pocahontas Press. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County. Web sites: Fish and Wildlife Service,NWI, http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html Jefferson County Critical Areas Maps, http://www.cojefferson.wa.us/idms/mapserver.shtml National Resource Conservation Service, http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ /11' LOG ITEM C"N 4: JEFFERSON COUNTY_., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 � � 360/379-4450 .360/379-4451 Fax http://www.cojefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet Lower QSccvv'y 8,--y 1&s.te-a1'to )4rvjecfi MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: 4/0 t4\ U(y en1C- s cj r 1 (,)a ii+1 U v( DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,""medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E..SITE) Size of parcel 51% ‘ acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. -r a.YeL i o n ,..-A,`G vQS-tvr- Size of parcel in square feet Sq/, 9 sq/ft fit (1 1 '� S tot10 1 w; (I f'uLk4_ pis e2 ( /4wv 10i ,eigiti 07' we y +ha+ %S 60(ju.Le2-1- -fo u c+fevli e.. A.Kpk_ -fi re-i 1 51'e c-. 0- 1.-he- phjec;-f Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION.AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared,graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert%acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes No Well utilities,etc. /0 a, 800 sq/ft Does the project convert 2'A acres or more of (n/a-rer 'Ke_ native vegetation to pasture? rivew y,parking,roads,etc. S1, a)8 sq/ft r•■ I Circle: Yes No Lawn,landscaping,etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. 6 / 4 j 1 Y6 sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Kes+oraiio'\ Fxco..vct(o,1s Total Land Disturbance `7 6 y , .)-7 Lf sq/ft Cut .S. 2 c)-7 Fill / ) 00 (cold) [over] stormwater calc worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 1 Wage of Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Sidewalks(Tr-■!) 1 3 O sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc sq/ft Driveway,parking Grp etc 3416 ,3 0 d sq/ft (#w y /O( Other sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New f , 3 6 0 sq/ft Total Existing 3`f6 ,.3 U a- sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* 3 6 Lt 6 6 a sq/ft "This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: /3,3 Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stonnwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. /0)-70)-0 (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRE(4) 1/a -- TATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) stormwater calc worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 2 LOG ITEM Page t�f� " Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Olympic Discovery Trail and Waterline Jefferson County, Washington June 14, 2013 Prepared for Parametrix 4660 Kitsap Way, Suite A Bremerton, Washington 98312 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds,WA 98020 (425)778-0907 LOG ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS . `age OF of -� 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1-1 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1-2 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2-1 2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2-1 2.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2-1 2.3 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 2-2 2.3.1 U.S.Highway 101 Crossing(Vicinity of Station 11+00) 2-2 2.3.2 Snow Creek Crossing 2-2 2.3.3 SR 20 Crossing 2-3 2.3.4 U.S.Highway 101 Crossing(Vicinity of Station 23+00) 2-3 2.3.5 Salmon Creek Crossing 2-3 2.3.6 Vicinity of Old Gardiner Road 2-4 2.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 2-4 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3-1 3.1 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 3-1 3.2 SOLDIER PILE WALL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 3-2 3.3 HIGHWAY CROSSINGS 3-3 3.3.1 Alternative Trenchless Pipe Installation Methods 3-3 3.3.2 Construction Dewatering 3-4 3.4 CREEK CROSSINGS 3-4 3.4.1 Trenchless Installation Method 3-5 3.4.2 Construction Dewatering 3-6 4.0 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS 4-1 5.0 USE OF THIS REPORT 5-1 6.0 REFERENCE 6-1 FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site and Exploration Plan Key 3 Exploration Plan,Highway Crossing Station 11+00 4 Exploration Plan, Snow Creek and SR 20 Crossings 5 Exploration Plan,Highway 101 and Salmon Creek Crossings 6 Exploration Plan, Old Gardiner Road 7 Lateral Earth Pressure Diagram 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc ll LANDAU ASSOCIATES L I F AA Page of APPENDICES Appendix Title A Field Explorations B Laboratory Soil Testing 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doc iii LANDAU ASSOCIATES LOG ITEM ?age of joy 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of geotechnical engineering services conducted for the North Olympic Salmon Coalition's (NOSC) proposed Olympic Discovery Trail and Waterline project in Jefferson County, Washington. The general project location is shown on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The general configuration of the project alignment and some of the existing features along the project alignment are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan Key(Figure 2). This report has been prepared based on our discussions with representatives of Parametrix; a base map of the project alignment provided by Parametrix; data collected during our field exploration and laboratory testing programs; our familiarity with geologic conditions within the vicinity of the project alignment;and our experience on similar projects. 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The NOSC,the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW), and the Jefferson County Marine Resources Committee have partnered to restore estuary habitat in Discovery Bay. As part of these restoration efforts, the in-water portion of an abandoned railroad grade in the project area will be removed. This railroad grade is the location of a privately-owned public waterline that must be re-aligned to a location outside of the restoration area. In addition, a portion of the Olympic Discovery/Larry Scott Trail runs along Discovery Bay and the alignment for the new waterline has been identified as one possible location for a key link in this trail system. The project includes the installation of approximately 7,400 ft of water line along U.S. Highway 101 at the head of Discovery Bay near Port Townsend, Washington. The new waterline will cross U.S. Highway 101 at two locations and State Route 20 (SR 20) at one location. The new waterline will also cross two creeks (Snow Creek and Salmon Creek). It is understood that trenchless construction techniques will be used to install the new waterline under the highways and creeks. At the creek crossings, the proposed waterline will be installed in a 16-inch diameter, high- density polyethylene(HDPE)casing. Within the approximately northern 4,000-ft section of the proposed waterline alignment that is located between Old Gardiner Road and the Discovery Bay Train Car Restaurant, it is hoped that the corridor for the new waterline can be utilized for the location of the Olympic Discovery Trail. If the waterline corridor is used for the trail, a soldier pile wall with a maximum exposed height on the order of about 12 ft would be required near the intersection of U.S. Highway 101 and Old Gardiner Road to support the outboard edge of the trail. A reinforced slope and a rock wall may also be used to support the outboard edge of the trail near the northern end of the project alignment (our scope of 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc 1-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES LC :c IT FAA Page work does not include providing geotechnical design recommendations for these two project elements, and as a result, geotechnical recommendations related to these project elements are not included in this report). 1.2 SCOPE OF SERVICES Parametrix retained Landau Associates to provide geotechnical engineering services to support design of the proposed Olympic Discovery Trail and Waterline project. Our services were provided in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in and the terms of Amendment No. 1 to a Subconsultant Agreement between Parametrix and Landau Associates dated February 13, 2013. Our scope of services included the following specific tasks: • Preparing and submitting a traffic control plan to the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) • Providing the necessary traffic control devices and personnel when working within WSDOT right-of-way • Obtaining utility clearances prior to performing field explorations • Advancing a series of borings to characterize soil and groundwater conditions along the proposed waterline alignment • Collecting representative soil samples from the borings at selected intervals • Logging each soil boring and recording pertinent information, including soil sample depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics, and groundwater occurrence • Conducting a limited geotechnical laboratory testing program • Evaluating data derived from the subsurface investigation and laboratory testing programs and performing certain geotechnical engineering analyses • Developing geotechnical engineering conclusions and recommendations to support design of certain elements of the proposed waterline and trail • Preparing and submitting this written report summarizing our findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the project. This report includes: — site plans showing the approximate locations of the explorations completed for this study — results of the laboratory testing and descriptive logs of the exploratory borings — a discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions observed in the explorations along the project alignment — a discussion related to seismic hazards along the project alignment — a discussion related to the liquefaction susceptibility of the soils in the vicinity of the proposed stream crossings — recommended soldier pile wall design parameters, including lateral earth pressures (including surcharge and seismic earth pressures)acting behind the wall and passive earth pressures acting in front of the wall 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRr\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doc 1-2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES LO TEM Sege J of - an evaluation of the need for temporary construction dewatering for excavations related to the installation of the waterline beneath the highways and creeks — a discussion of trenchless techniques that could be used to install the waterline beneath the highways and creeks — recommendations for geotechnical monitoring and testing during construction. • • 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc 1-3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES LC ;i iTFM Page �� a 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS This section discusses the general geologic setting of the project area and describes the surface and subsurface conditions observed in the vicinity of the project alignment at the time of our field investigation. Interpretations of the site conditions are based on the results of our review of available information, and the results of our site reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, and laboratory testing program. 2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING General geologic information for the project area was obtained from the Washington Interactive Geologic Map (Washington State Department of Natural Resources 2012), published by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources' Division of Geology and Earth Resources. According to this source, near-surface deposits in the vicinity of the project alignment consist of glacial outwash. Soil defined as outwash typically consists of stratified sand or sand and gravel with variable amounts of silt and cobbles. This unit was transported by meltwater emanating from the face of glaciers and deposited into streams and pools. This unit, which typically exhibits high permeability and moderate shear strength, is susceptible to erosion, especially when exposed on steep slopes. Beach deposits are also mapped along the portion of Discovery Bay that is located in the project area. Beach deposits generally consist of silt, sand, and gravel, and are typically soft/loose, and depending on composition, can be moderately compressible. In areas, beach deposits may contain interbeds of compressible peat and/or organic silt. Though not shown on the above-referenced geologic map, fill associated with the original construction of U.S. Highway 101 and other adjacent roadways and improvements and ablation till should be anticipated along the project alignment. Soil defined as ablation till typically consists of a heterogenous, non-sorted mixture of subrounded boulders, cobbles, gravel, and sand in a matrix of silt and clay. Ablation till (as opposed to subglacial till or glacial till) was not overridden and compacted by the weight of an advancing glacier and is a residual deposit of soil that was deposited as the glacial ice melted away. Ablation till is not as dense as glacial till. 2.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS The project alignment is located at the head of Discovery Bay near Port Townsend, Washington. The project alignment generally follows the shoulder of a two-lane paved roadway (U.S. Highway 101). Within the northern portion of the project alignment, U.S. Highway 101 is supported by an embankment that is generally inclined at about 3H:1V to 2H:1V (horizontal:vertical); 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_Rep.doc 2-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page q7 ff.. 2- however, in localized areas (e.g., in the vicinity of some culvert crossings), the inclination of the embankment is steeper. The project alignment crosses two creeks: Snow Creek and Salmon Creek. Development along the project alignment is relatively sparse, but where present it is primarily commercial in nature. Vegetation along the project alignment typically consists of low growing grasses, salal,blackberry, and several varieties of coniferous and deciduous trees. 2.3 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions along the project alignment were explored by advancing and sampling eight exploratory borings (B-1 through B-8) on March 13 and 14, 2013. The exploratory borings were advanced to depths ranging from about 161/2 to 40'/2 ft below the existing ground surface (BGS). The approximate locations of the exploratory borings are shown on Figures 2 through 6. A discussion of field exploration procedures, together with edited logs of the exploratory borings, is presented in Appendix A. A discussion of laboratory test procedures and the test results are presented in Appendix B. The following sections provide information regarding the subsurface conditions observed in the explorations completed for this project. 2.3.1 U.S.HIGHWAY 101 CROSSING(VICINITY OF STATION 11+00) Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the U.S. Highway 101 crossing that is proposed at about Station 11+00 were characterized by boring B-1. The approximate location of boring B-1 and the proposed waterline are shown on Figure 3. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in this exploration, the area in the vicinity of this highway crossing is interpreted to be underlain by alluvium that is overlain by fill. The fill encountered in boring B-1 generally consists of about 131/4 ft of loose very sandy gravel; very loose to loose sand with interbeds of loose gravel and varying amounts of silt; and medium stiff to stiff silt with varying amounts of sand. The alluvium that was encountered beneath the fill generally consists of stiff clay that is thinly laminated with silty sand. 2.3.2 SNOW CREEK CROSSING Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Snow Creek crossing were characterized by boring B-2. The approximate location of boring B-2 in relation to the proposed waterline crossing of Snow Creek is shown on Figure 4. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in this exploration, the area in the vicinity of this creek crossing is interpreted to be underlain by fill that is underlain by alluvium and outwash. The fill encountered in boring B-2 generally consists of about 141/2 ft of medium dense to dense sand with varying amounts of silt and some wood fragments. At the location of boring B-2,the fill is underlain by about 12'/2 ft of alluvium that generally consists of soft organic silt and soft to medium 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc 2-2 LANDAU Assoc IATES Page • of d65 stiff silt with wood and organics and thin interbeds of peat. The alluvium is underlain by outwash that extends to the maximum depth of boring B-2, about 311/2 ft. At the location explored, the outwash generally consists of medium dense, sandy gravel with trace silt. 2.3.3 SR 20 CROSSING Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the proposed SR 20 crossing were characterized by boring B-3, which was advanced at the approximate location shown on Figure 4. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in this exploration, the area in the vicinity of this highway crossing is interpreted to be underlain by fill that is in turn underlain by ablation till. The fill encountered in boring B-3 generally consists of about 10 ft of medium stiff silt with friable clasts of siltstone/sandstone and varying amounts of silt and gravel. The ablation till that was encountered beneath the fill generally consists of medium dense to dense sand with varying amounts of gravel and interbeds of stiff, sandy gravelly silt. 2.3.4 U.S.HIGHWAY 101 CROSSING(VICINITY OF STATION 23+00) Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the U.S. Highway 101 crossing that is proposed in the vicinity of Station 23+00 were characterized by boring B-4, which was advanced at the approximate location as shown on Figure 5. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in this exploration, the area in the vicinity of this highway crossing is interpreted to be underlain by beach/marine deposits that are overlain by fill that was about 11 ft thick at the location that was explored. The fill encountered in boring B-4 generally consists of very loose to medium dense, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. The beach/marine deposits that were encountered beneath the fill generally consist of soft clay with interbeds of silty sand and fine organic matter. 2.3.5 SALMON CREEK CROSSING Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the proposed Salmon Creek crossing were characterized by boring B-5. The approximate location of boring B-5 relative to the proposed crossing of Salmon Creek is shown on Figure 5. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in this exploration, the area in the vicinity of this creek crossing is interpreted to be underlain by beach/marine deposits that are overlain by fill. The fill encountered in boring B-5 generally consists of about 41/2 ft of medium dense, very gravelly sand to very sandy gravel. The beach/marine deposits that were encountered beneath the fill generally consist of very soft to soft silt with scattered wood and interbeds of very loose sand, medium dense gravel,soft organic silt, and soft peat. 6/14/13 P:\I93\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrail FD_frep.doc 2-3 LANDAU Assoc IATES LC_ .kr"j 1T PM 'age of20;- 2.3.6 VICINITY OF OLD GARDINER ROAD Subsurface conditions in the vicinity of Old Gardiner Road were characterized by borings B-6 through B-8, which were advanced at the approximate locations indicated on Figure 6. Based on the subsurface conditions observed in these explorations, the area in the vicinity of Old Gardiner Road is interpreted to be underlain by outwash that is overlain by about 12 to 15 ft of fill at the locations explored. The fill encountered in borings B-6 through B-8 generally consists of medium dense to very dense sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel that is interbedded with medium dense to very dense gravel with varying amounts of sand and silt. At the locations explored,the fill is underlain by outwash that generally consists of medium dense to very dense sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel and gravel with varying amounts of sand and silt. The outwash unit was not fully penetrated and extends to the maximum depth of our explorations,about 40'/2 ft. 2.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS At the time of our field investigation in mid March 2013, groundwater was observed in borings B-2 and B-7 at depths of about 7'/2 and 30 ft BGS, respectively. Groundwater was not observed within the depths explored in the remainder of our borings. The groundwater conditions reported herein and on the summary logs contained in Appendix A of this report are for the specific locations and dates indicated and, therefore, may not necessarily be indicative of other locations and/or times. Furthermore, it is . anticipated that groundwater conditions will vary depending on local subsurface conditions, the weather, and other factors. It is likely that the highest groundwater levels would occur in the winter/spring months. • 6/14/13 P:\1 93\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doc 24 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Wage pz: ®f 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the field exploration, laboratory testing, and engineering analyses performed, it is our opinion that subsurface conditions along the project alignment are suitable for the • proposed construction, provided the recommendations contained herein are incorporated into the project design. The following sections present geotechnical conclusions and recommendations related to seismic considerations, soldier pile wall design, alternative trenchless pipe. installation methods, and the anticipated need for temporary construction dewatering. 3.1 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The Pacific Northwest is seismically active and the project area could be subject to ground shaking from a moderate to major earthquake. Consequently, moderate levels of earthquake shaking should be anticipated during the design life of the proposed improvements, and the proposed soldier pile wall should be designed to resist earthquake loading using appropriate design methodology. Seismic hazard maps based on a 7 percent probability of exceedance in a 75-year period (1-in-975 year event) were used to estimate the design acceleration for the project area. Based on the seismic hazard maps that were reviewed,the maximum peak horizontal ground acceleration in the project area for a seismic event with a 975-year return period (design level earthquake) is approximately 39 percent of gravity (0.39g) [from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Ground Motion Calculator (USGS website 2011)]. Soil liquefaction is generally limited to granular soils located below the water table that are in a relatively loose, unconsolidated condition at the time of a large, nearby earthquake. The glacially derived soils that underlie the higher northern and southern portions of the project alignment are anticipated to have a low susceptibility to soil liquefaction. Consequently,it is our opinion that the proposed soldier pile wall, reinforced slope, and rock wall are located in areas that have a low susceptibility to soil liquefaction. The loose saturated alluvial and beach/marine deposits that underlie the project alignment in the vicinity of Snow Creek and Salmon Creek are anticipated to have a susceptibility to soil liquefaction. If soil liquefaction were to occur in the vicinity of Snow Creek and Salmon Creek, it would likely result in liquefaction-induced settlement of the ground surface and possibly lateral spreading of the creek banks towards the centerline of the creek. Detailed liquefaction and lateral spreading analysis was not performed, but it is estimated that the magnitude of the ground settlement could be on the order of several inches or more. The settlement of the ground surface and the lateral movement of the creek banks could result in settlement and distortion of the proposed waterline. The potential for damage to the waterline as 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doc 3-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES rrEM Page 0 a result of soil liquefaction could be reduced by using flexible pipe and flexible pipe connections to construct the portion of the proposed waterline that is underlain by soil with a liquefaction potential. 3.2 SOLDIER PILE WALL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS In the vicinity of the intersection of U.S. Highway 101 and Old Gardiner Road, a cantilevered soldier pile wall with a maximum exposed height of 12 ft is being considered to support a fill that will be used to support a portion of the Olympic Discovery Trail. This wall type is considered feasible for its intended function at the proposed wall location. The following sections provide recommendations for design of the proposed soldier pile wall. The soldier pile wall should be designed to resist active lateral earth pressures. The use of active, lateral earth pressures assumes that sufficient deformation of the soil behind the wall can occur to develop an active condition. Theoretical and observed lateral deflections at the top of soldier pile walls designed for active pressures are typically on the order of 0.001 to 0.002 times the height of the wall. This lateral deformation is likely to be accompanied by some vertical settlement, which could be up to about 0.005 times the height of the wall. For the case of a soldier pile wall acting as a cantilever wall, the applied active lateral earth pressure on the wall for this project can be represented by a triangular pressure distribution as shown on Figure 7. The active lateral pressures would act over the soldier pile spacing over the exposed wall area and over the soldier pile width where the soldier pile is completely embedded. Because the proposed soldier pile wall will be a permanent structure, the recommended earth pressures presented on Figure 7 include seismic earth pressures. Passive pressure criteria for resistance of lateral loads are presented on Figure 7. The passive pressure values presented on this figure include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The passive pressure shown on Figure 7 should be applied over three times the diameter of the soldier pile, or the soldier pile spacing, whichever is less. In addition, the upper 2 ft of passive resistance should be neglected in design as indicated on Figure 7. The design of the soldier pile wall should take into account the influence of surcharge loading within a horizontal distance equal to or less than the height of the wall. It is typical practice to accommodate traffic and construction equipment loading with a vertical surcharge pressure of 250 lbs per square foot. Earth stockpiles or other larger surcharge loads should be addressed by use of a higher surcharge pressure. For walls free to rotate during loading, a uniformly distributed lateral pressure as shown on Figure 7 should be added to the active earth pressure to account for the influence of traffic and/or equipment surcharge loading. 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrail FD_frep.doc 3-2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES PagelsotaA Because of soil arching between soldier piles, a reduced lateral earth pressure can be used for the lagging design. Experience suggests that about 30 percent of the lateral earth pressure uniformly distributed over the width of the lagging can be used for lagging design where the free space between the concreted soldier pile sections is three soldier pile diameters or less. If the free space between soldier piles is greater than three diameters, lagging should be designed for 50 percent of the lateral earth pressure. 3.3 HIGHWAY CROSSINGS The new waterline will cross U.S. Highway 101 at two locations and State Route 20 at one location. For the purpose of the following discussion, it is assumed that the maximum depth of excavation that will be required to install the waterline beneath U.S. Highway 101 and SR 20 will be on the order of about 10 ft. At the U.S. Highway 101 crossing proposed in the vicinity of Station 11+00,the upper 10 ft of soil is anticipated to be variable fill generally consisting of very loose to loose sand with interbeds of loose gravel with varying amounts of silt,and medium stiff to stiff silt with varying amounts of sand. The upper 10 ft of soil at the U.S. Highway 101 crossing proposed in the vicinity of Station 23+00 is anticipated to be variable fill generally consisting of medium dense, silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. At the location of the proposed SR 20 crossing,the upper 10 ft of soil is anticipated to be variable fill generally consisting of medium stiff silt with friable clasts of siltstone/sandstone and varying amounts of silt and gravel extending to a depth of about 7 ft, followed by about 3 ft of medium dense to dense sand with varying amounts of gravel and interbeds of stiff, sandy gravely silt. Groundwater was not observed within the depths of the explorations completed at the proposed highway crossing locations at the time of drilling. The following sections provide conclusions and recommendations related to alternative pipe installation methods and the anticipated need for temporary construction dewatering. 3.3.1 ALTERNATIVE TRENCHLESS PIPE INSTALLATION METHODS Based on conditions observed in our subsurface explorations and our understanding of the project, it is our opinion that installing the waterline under the highways using either the jack-and-bore or horizontal directional drilling(HDD)method of installation is feasible from a geotechnical perspective. The jack-and-bore method of installation typically includes a jacking pit with large hydraulic jacks, a jacking reaction system, a spoils removal system, and a temporary shoring system. As the casing is advanced along the alignment, a hardened cutting shoe around the leading edge of the casing directs soil into the casing interior, forming a soil plug. A continuous flight auger then removes material from 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doe 3-3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES age the tail end of the soil plug. In medium dense (or denser) granular soils or stiff cohesive soils above the groundwater table, only a minimal soil plug is needed to prevent flowing or raveling of ground. In loose, cohesionless soils or when pockets of perched groundwater are encountered, a more substantial soil plug is necessary. If flowing or raveling of ground is not controlled, voids can develop. If not properly filled, these voids can migrate upwards and cause sinkholes at the ground surface. However, the detection and control of voids is generally straightforward for an experienced contractor. Due to the presence of some loose cohesionless soils in the vicinity of the two proposed crossings of U.S. Highway 101, we expect that maintaining an adequate soil plug during advancement of the casing for the waterline will be critical to reducing possible impacts to U.S. Highway 101 if this method of installation is selected. As an alternative to the jack-and-bore method of installation, the horizontal directional drilling (HDD)technique could be used to install the waterline beneath U.S. Highway 101 and SR 20. The HDD technique consists of excavating two shallow pits (an insertion pit and a receiving pit). The shallow pits are then filled with a drilling mud. A curved borehole is then drilled between the two pits with a steerable bit and then a product pipe is pulled from the receiving pit to the insertion pit using the drill steel that was used to bore the hole between the two pits. Advantages of the jack-and-bore and HDD methods of installation over the open trench method include relatively small construction impacts, the speed at which a pipe can be installed, limited amount of surface restoration required, and the elimination of the need for open trenches across U.S. Highway 101 and SR 20. 3.3.2 CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING Based on the groundwater conditions observed at the time of our fieldwork, it is anticipated that excavations associated with the trenchless installation of the waterline at the three proposed highway crossing will likely be above the groundwater table. However, during periods of extended wet weather, groundwater could perch on top of the interbedded layers of relatively impermeable silt that were observed within the fill and till deposits. Perched groundwater could also be present at other times of the year. If perched groundwater is encountered in the excavations, we anticipate that groundwater seepage into the excavations could be controlled using a combination of sumps and pumps. 3.4 CREEK CROSSINGS The new waterline will cross two creeks (Snow Creek and Salmon Creek). At the proposed Snow Creek crossing, sandy gravel and gravelly sand fill (to a depth of about 14'/2 in the nearby boring) that is underlain by alluvium and outwash is anticipated. At the proposed Salmon Creek crossing, fill composed of gravelly sand to sandy gravel (to a depth of about 41/2 ft in the nearby boring) over 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_rep.doc 34 LANDAU AssocIATES Page of beach/marine deposits that include scattered wood, organic silt, and peat are anticipated. Groundwater was not observed within the depths of the exploration completed near the Salmon Creek crossing,but wet, fine-grained soil was disclosed below a depth of about 5 ft that could represent groundwater or perched groundwater conditions. Groundwater was observed at a depth of about 71/4 ft in the exploration completed near the Snow Creek crossing. The following sections provide conclusions and recommendations related to the HDD method of installation and the anticipated need for temporary construction dewatering. 3.4.1 TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION METHOD Based on conditions observed in our subsurface explorations and our understanding of the project, it is our opinion that installing the waterline under Snow Creek and Salmon Creek by means of horizontal directional drilling is feasible from a geotechnical perspective. Advantages of the HDD method are described in Section 3.3.1 of this report. When considering the HDD method, it should be recognized that because the drilling fluid used to advance the borehole is under significant pressure, it has the capability of expanding and fissuring the soil surrounding the borehole. When drilling under a creek, this fissuring could result in a hydraulic connection between the borehole and the creek(commonly referred to as "frac-out"), which would result in an environmental issue if the drilling fluid enters the creek. The impact that a release of drilling mud will have on creeks and its buffers is largely dependent upon the time from when the frac-out occurs to when it is observed, drilling is stopped, and emergency spill response activities are implemented. Consequently, if the HDD method of installation is used on this project, the project specifications should require the contractor to have dedicated personnel positioned along the alignment of the pipe to monitor for evidence of frac-out. The contractor should also be required to have contingency plans that include immediately shutting down the drilling operations, implementing spill response activities, and notifying appropriate owner representatives and regulatory personnel. Based on our experience with similar trenchless creek crossings in similar ground conditions and information gathered through conversations with a local experienced horizontal directional drilling contractor, we estimated the minimum depth of cover over the HDPE casing that would be required to limit the potential for frac-out during installation of the casing. The recommended minimum depth of cover (measured vertically between the bottom of the creek and the top of the pipe) is at least 15 to 20 ft. A range of cover thicknesses is given because the likelihood of frac-out can be affected by many factors, including drilling technique, characteristics of the drilling mud, mud flow rates (i.e., pressure), and drill advance rates, as well as unanticipated variations in soil properties. Increasing the vertical distance 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc 3-5 LANDAU ASSOCIATES L . between the bottom of the creak and the top of the HDPE casing would help reduce the potential for frac- • out. When considering the HDD method, it should also be recognized that the presence of wood and other large objects (such as the remnant bridge foundation or structure that is located in Snow Creek adjacent to U.S. Highway 101) could make it difficult, if not impossible to complete the boreholes. We therefore recommend trying to establish the depth of the remnant structure that is located in Snow Creek to confirm that the proposed bore path will not conflict with the remnant structure. 3.4.2 CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING Even though groundwater was not specifically observed within the depths of the exploration completed near the Salmon Creek crossing, wet soils are present and it should be anticipated that the elevation of the groundwater adjacent to the creek will roughly coincide with the water surface elevation of Salmon Creek. This same reasoning applies to Snow Creek. Provided the water surface elevations of Snow Creek and Salmon Creek at the time of construction are at least 5 ft lower than the ground surface surrounding the insertion and receiving pits for the HDD operation (which are anticipated to have a maximum depth of about 3 to 4 ft), it is anticipated that temporary construction dewatering will not be needed to facilitate installation of the proposed•trenchless crossings of Snow Creek and Salmon Creek. 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTraitFD_frep.doc 3-6 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Lk, , t 1d� 4.0 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS We recommend that Landau Associates be retained to review the geotechnical-related portions of the project plans and specifications to confirm if they are consistent with the recommendations presented in this report. We also recommend that monitoring, testing, and consultation be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by our explorations, to provide expedient recommendations should conditions be revealed during construction that differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether geotechnical-related construction activities comply with the project plans and specifications and the recommendations contained in this report. 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_frep.doc 4-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES LC ,r-r, !T Page /D t �, 5.0 USE OF THIS REPORT Landau Associates prepared this report for the exclusive use of Parametrix and the North Olympic Salmon Coalition for specific application to the design of the Olympic Discovery Trail and Waterline project in Jefferson County, Washington. Use of this report by others or for another project is at the user's sole risk. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been conducted in accordance with generally accepted practices of the geotechnical engineering profession; no other warranty,express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the subsurface data obtained from the explorations completed for this study. There may be some variation in subsurface soil and groundwater conditions along the project alignment, and the nature and extent of the variations may not become evident until construction. Accordingly, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the construction budget and schedule. If variations in subsurface conditions are encountered during construction, Landau Associates should be notified for review of the recommendations in this report, and revision of such if necessary. If there is a substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of construction, or if conditions change due to construction operations at or adjacent to the project alignment, we recommend that we review this report to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services on this project and look forward to assisting you during the construction phase of the project. If you have any questions or comments regarding the information contained in this report,or if we may be of further service, please call. LANDAU ASSOCIATES,INC. SI 6'1/4-'0 ft. . 4. Steven R. Wright,P.E. dr. Principal Pk' ?, P SZW/DRS/rgm ' '' ‘ t 4/13 6114/13 P\1931071\FilkRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail ED_frep doc 5-.I LANDAU ASSOCIATES'. L s, Page _ 6.0 REFERENCE Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 2012. Washington Interactive Geologic Map. https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/geology/ Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources—Washington's Geological Survey. Accessed on April 12,2012. USGS website. 2011. Earthquake Hazards Program, Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator. Version 5.1.0. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/javacalc.php. Accessed March 29, 2013. • • • 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\DiscoveryTrailFD_frep.doc 6-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES Lt. s I° ,n .r1. > age 11 of"4(-4� ;.fix rC o• ) i ,,, ,, ,',,.,!;",, ,:1„;:::ii,,,',"','''.J o‘ yyh ,, � s� e Gay in { c sicOe,r'i Y MjSy m � *r9t1 a�. :� t; , '`' _ C i ‘44,fir'' -Aiihh,,,.:4,,,,, ' 'WProject Location 20 •,,.z.".. kV E ai m W ----7 '.iha, `„-a d�9� 4CO Ntd 29 O Del my Lake a m v to it o c F. Project Location -•\t% Everett 0 0.5 1 Dis .very ea�r Seattle • I Spokane ,� -� ,.,,:Tacoma Washjngton g N Miles 1,- V- Data Source:ESRI 2008 M Olympic Discovery Trail Figure iii4iLANDAU and Waterline Vicinity Map ASSOCIATES Jefferson County, Washington tf..........___4 _ it °� #Ry�` +ice }` ' ` 4 g 0,p 0 4d'" '_ CO J ilk r -1.i „ r 'x g kyl . t c-,.1 4 CI 0 if CC - Q cyl L. —J Ca .14klir XCI" k ,• y , QJ ' W C CO °fie, x r ,� V `' 2/ 4 4, ' ,' 1 .qty' ,j a EL Lit.; O0 1. = � 4 r , AI t +if x u' i m, € ja + ■'; 1: • •,.:44 4. ,.1 ., , i , , . E ..r C J'�f .. 4. ij�.4 +te .r y� d�'+..,� tZ � �Y' 4 L - ,, 1 - 'A. ,p\ ,,,,... ...,, . , , . 4, - ., ,.,..,-. ,,,,,,, ',,,,, - 0.4'1- 1 ;1 - Y i f Y Y C q4Y jt 4y� � $:; l O fl) L ° t "fi II v N U �jj' .T 4. CL 03 c I\Ni„1/4.....,, •-• ' cl E o tit . o r � r ydr- iN • J k w . ti,W. All y� Q �W sla, 4,4-0 , - 4 *, w a. a hx • .. V 1 S h iz Fr yt o o o 4',m- s "K�4 Ca 0 S ,1 e. •Y Z <va ,•{i+.,t f j! sue r - A f. y * ,. t ,, r > t .i'y L .� !, - .,r 1 . CO % �, �. C 4: + K X • i to 0 0 Xg „!ta ' f N ' A N' J m :� .' r 4 , a °I O co O .-r' s OW l as 0 t-' : (6 C 4,: ��1 �� 1 r v �� O U V r (0 .i;� t r.n,r ,. 0.1 .J Off, ` I+� - �_ , ` N O// =/ f W 4 U C U�'_ f _-. 'r I 1f'. y a 0 N y t � O � x 'eft---- £ 13 M�*/--, €e,,i ! p _ . \ q. _ O LL g / F zf _ — g yK; a r *„ -; "*F� x �� ' - tn N C� O a—i ➢ - " Y s w 0 Z g L � 'l iv ,____,_ _ w4'.. :/�, If- Tti \,...,4r011---------4. .4 , - - - c rn o0 \ a+ a _ VJ _ 'y nv C6‘ 1 + \ 0 a J $ 'ice _ ' i 1$ . = L U I" \ ca 'a 'a. O ILL! CD N ...ha»+ y�I J , , N c �: fir. ^ �,. — 151)ti C 3 U - g ___,_� � - ti t:, t" ', -a". \______:// 2'1 1„.. \ z;/.;//-1/-. U- s r i `( - . a/. � O a. - F"- 7 oi, F ��. / ///:‘ : t ''' '`/ 0 / \., / o 44 LW F- 0 JJ I�, di- 1 0� 9 U cj/ / /7/ t , 4 Z VI Z 5 z #______k 9 I k• 0 0 a , C a3 l O• Q J / r / G v /••:.'ol r _ . � . . w ••• V .} '•-....-.6,.. -' • • - . '' '- ''•-•T..-,.•• ,•- . . • \ . -' : O . ‘"-).'1( 9 '1- ' ct. .. cu , y / i' o' y. /,. •x N a) \\ To 0 r / .• 3 � / r te. 4� m t L r T \ y ' /�, c• 4 .fix Q f ".F�r / /, i O• a O V ,/ r � °o Ii cn ze," `x/ N � > f "�9A o / l n / �d % P ( / 8 -0 N o / / o U /CI.n 'z ;•i .Lj Z.4...4__6.;_.;)_\_,,.,./'/ % aoi \ LL 1j / o c .. . /1,-...:, l . .. . ,. ... . ..:........., Q 0 3 g--•.*-Z Lk._ :T; !Trim / Page of , . -.., T , ,-, ,k,\---,-)1 , -2,,F','qj 2 ...!'.:1- -:`'-'; ‘, -'-in( ,.,. . ca, 0 „ u-,iii- i - ,\ ,,,,i, ,'.-, , \ 1,N , " k. ` 1i'''' ° '' ' ' ' '. i 1,„ ,c,,,,c, ..., , , . \v„ a ,,,,,,, , 11.74 l' 1 gE 7> ',:',...';`-' \ ''''.7<„ ,,.;°' .`■''')1', ".4"A.: /v5 8 -'i,--, . %;',4•, , ,, , ti. so, -2 ,,..:7,..4....y..-‘ ,= ; .,--' -, , .. ..., ,, . ,,, x •:,,. ..- ''' R 0 i C co 8- 8 ' .4„,' '.\\,' ‘-' ^■%- 1 ce ri. AS 0 ,11.". \ 2 .'"/ ; ,. -0:. ft ,.i, :-...:., ',-„.\ \ ,. ' 1 'a .1 : 2 g's =4.;) \-tt',.., v) )' *. 1 ' c 0 a) .A„-• \ „:,,o,,,, .,,,t,,c%\ i -2 i f 7 ,.•;,,.-,'''...4--Z'6t,,.r'-,,:,,,,,,4".„-.,'' '.'e-7''••:•',.C,4',,4,t..t".e''.(,'?-'c;,,',/„',....,',\',\'-,\-*\',\c 1.\,,.*:,,'Cc,fc,:,„-4 f'f:.'1-..'fr:,4t".10 S-,,).'1 t.',,1,'/' -:'N•i'•';'1:L,.1-,i\,-,.,,i 1\\vi 3°.2---•rs,t"d,,1 i,P,,c'...'\ 7C , . .,. ... .o , \ , L.▪ 0 1 , uo c 0 LI . r'''.,,■ ,. ''-'1'2,-r.'4.: 1 '''' ./, . ,,t, '± , '.., a .•V1 ;I , Y,A \ ';)it '7) . 0 \ , ck. . , lili 4 cTo c CD 1,-- •- 00 F.-., 2 . I., , ,• .' . „,. , ,1„,,,, ; , ,, , ,., ,. !..--„--. 06 0 > 'C '5 0 <1) >7, p 4 CN/ 0 as -I-, ",- X W > C "•-::;-_,,,,t'^t,,,.... ,,,,,\•, ,5.. ;'.. ,S.cr?V‘,,r, •,,,,',r ; 1 4.0 i,p.4'.. 6,1.-::;,, 1 -0 :r,-;-• '''',.:0',,,,.Y.' \,--0',- . , ' 'yk' ..., \-\' , cO%'"'"i -'-- , E 0 . . A..- \ .•,'"'• 1, ,- ,.'• 4 iv.. ' rr''`.•'''• 01 2 a ca c 9', .‘ 44-,\ ,' ', '' \\ 0 E 0 ,',,,,,,.1 . .f„\A,.1 -A - 1...,$,N, \ ,,,,.•-,if- ,,i,-1F ', , llt■ Nik,:' '.,... N,\.`:` *.'f':',,1\t'-`4.-L, a — , ,,,,' -' ,1*,.,- '''- .,,„'-.'' , \,,' -,',,ArT', ,-{s: ' ". •' \ ,,, \ '':\ '', "-',\,',7tir'N w 2*.:44".1 'r- !-.,•tr' ' ' ...., rr,;.1,, .,. .z.- : '..4tk`,', t`-'..,,,' ' c? ,\' \s' 4;7 `,...'7'. .? .. , m a) t \\ \.,''' ',,, 'T-A:\''' ,:, --) '" - ' .. ' --.7 '"`-':- 4,',"''-'-1.\ ..,4. .,s■`. k';,i;.i '' It,;A\ ' ',.k '':' ' '''`' .'1 t o) !, ,, .,4,y.'z ' %," , • f.f:„.,t '''''';.„;',..."' , \ ,.. ,'„'.pi".''.., ' \\\x, ; l 4 4 \,,k,,,-*,, ,... .. '', \ o c.I „---,, - ' ,,,a;T•44 Vc 4',..''''', ^.., ' "--,,, ' ',,,,,,f , , \ '. .,s,,N.:,,- ' ,,_,'r:\ ,I. T,,,, 'i ,,', . L :.'', ,..-,?4, ";101`7 ",,',,,;7A, ,,,. ,„■,,'%;,.■:,r,N,', ‘k','I\ -..`",' I ,, ,,s- lX,,,\.,\' ,,' i,,'''',qi - !.,, \ 4 \ \ ,-,,, ,...,. s ' ,,._, , :. -.!.:: i, ::,- . i„•-,t-4, ' ,,-`k',.K '% .111*' ' -! \ ,'''' ',$,' ': ''P.;''''IA`l 'Z' b ',, „, - t'l L-r*' .- - a.' '" 1.. ' e ,='"-' ,IY,'/..;',-r, '•,:,,,,,I, '4:1, , ', * . \ ' '', .'1-....f, X.,4:•*:,-1r. Z. t '\'..: ' r--, , ./ -It'. ''''r ' ''''' '•,'' .' -' ',',r' ' ',,‘Nkit. r, ,, .. \\\\.\\,\.:\*' .. , --,t.,..:',:-,%,,f-.;:,. . \ t ,c c .-5- \ -, 4 ' 4 `,". ';'-',l'"'n, ' '« .•-4` ,....t.', *-,,c4ri', ...:--1 °';'''- N8\:c1,0-4',*-^'4;."--«':•°. « \ , --:\ \?, '-' ' ':—." 14.72 _1,, ' `•-..,,,;,,47,t...L ,. > . - i- `", ,-,14;',, ,..,' „,'"',,i4_, ,, .,,,..„, • „,.,:i., , ;-- .,: ,4it.),.: - ,.,,, , Aolf, ,,,,„:' - .; ,„,k,.'-. . ,, ,-,,,,,. 0 -,, 4 , 407,1-,'\ 1,-■:",frq V• •...,-„N, : . \ , ,,--, ,,,,, , ,,...„ .,.„...,. ,,„ - ,:s, E ,.. ., , , ',9" ,1' v, ,,...t' ' ' ' if ',1-, 1 ';', ':. ? "+••' "'''' ' ;',\‘ ni'. f.,. t'''''. `• 0 , • ,•,...,y 171 *,,, , ,,,.:...,,,, ” -%iie; r:;'v,47,1-1--" ' ,';.4'4;.',.., ''',c,.,.'A -,,,t \.., ---'1; , "P.,„_. ',4 • S; ..„,,, A, : •,,,0.< '1 t -41-'L.' -,'-' ." ,-'-,A'ry-'....,•', ',7%...... ,ti...%r , : ,\.. , .„-:,:••-t„::// - ••• 7:, , LW ••:' "i'•'''- '."4■4/,''. ,•.,'". 'l'''' ' ` -`''':— 4••-'.- 't,. ' .- yQ.1„;;" r4::'''• ••*VI„, s-, .k ..', '4- (•,*_, .1 r''''.-- > ,,-ry " , ',',,-`,,, `, ' 4r, ,.-,1' , -',-,,.-,F,, ,t.„,,,.; ' .,,,,;,,4, k 4^",‘c- , ..,:„„,1,•, 'sN... :: '11,;k, y.0 5 r- .ci , ,. , , , k -I'S' ' s ' ":''4''''' ' \ 4.4% ,,#- : T',,Air,•, k' :'qif' -jr,O, - f. ..1,..i','0?,'' „flotk -‹() I Ft, '`„. 'r'''1..,1." 1- '-" '''','.:,,,,7:;. ' ir/Z7X",:,,,;tr,g, /L,N,.'1,f,,,, .--„,-41,)::r• ,,•„4,,,;,,bi, Q 0 vi t",,,,c!,;-• 1`,.• .," ',.,*rs-•;',"' "` ■• • "4""ti„. ..4;$4,' r."f'',. : ,e;`,, ',,,,,--:::t..1,,, ,, .f• - -it,. r',-,:r.r,:v-•.■ -■ ''''■'''tt•,.'o'.1..e ■ o o'L % :':' ' "2- ' ,'''' '): '. ■■,-.`": ''., ■ '%', ' • '''' .:41 .,'*-,'..1 e'.,‘, ■Ille,,%r:,;',. 1-1,0, 'Irt.,,r,h,%.',,,., ''.? ,5 0 4:-' •''' ' ' '-, : -4 \ %.,,,,,— ', ;t. '-...',1, '',5't ,, l',' -(,--,.: ;,--,-4)5b,44., v!--- 1,-- -. -' t ,:,...,.....,., ..1, . 4; ii-. p. - . ,,:;(-.„..,,'..; - •.,...,. ,. g . \ .Nu--z---- • Uniform Surcharge Pressure(Ds) 0.24L 120 1111111 Al 111 41111111 AMIN �-- �►- Ignore Upper 2 ft O." of Passive 3° All1111.11111111111111 1111.1111162A\--.A\_,, 111111 1 31(0CD) 130D Surcharge Earth Seismic Earth Active Earth Passive Earth Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure Not To Scale a Notes 1.Active pressure diagram assumes cantilevered soldier pile and lagging wall. 2.Solve for D Di summation of moments a°out bottom of wall. g 3.The passive pressure presented is an allowade value and includes a factor of safety of a°out 1.5. O 4.All earth pressures presented are in terms of pounds per scuare foot,with all dimesions in feet. • 5.It is assumed that hydrostatic pressures will not act on the wall. • 6.For soldier pile and lagging wall,the active pressure can°e assumed to act over the a height of lagging and over the pile width below the lagging. O 7.Apply passive pressure over 3 times the width of drilled shaft for soldier pile. m N Q g -Olympic Discovery Trail Figure LANDAU and Waterline Lateral Earth Pressure Diagram 7 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County, Washington rrrM Page of APPENDIX A Field Explorations Page ' APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions along the project alignment were explored on March 13 and 14, 2013. The exploration program consisted of advancing and sampling eight exploratory borings (B-1 through B-8) at the approximate locations illustrated on the Site and Exploration Plan Key (Figure 2 of this report). The exploratory borings were advanced to depths ranging from about 16'/2 to 401/4 ft below the existing ground surface (BGS) using the hollow-stem auger drilling technique. Geologic Drill Exploration, Inc. of Spokane, Washington advanced the borings under subcontract to Landau Associates. The explorations were located approximately in the field by hand taping distances from existing physical features and referenced to a base map provided by Parametrix. The ground surface elevations at the exploratory boring locations were not determined. The field exploration program was coordinated and monitored by a Landau Associates engineering geologist who also obtained representative soil samples, maintained a detailed record of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, and described the soil encountered by visual and textural examination. Each representative soil type observed in our exploratory borings was described using the soil classification system shown on Figure A-1, in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D2488, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure). Logs of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures A-2 through A-9. These logs represent our interpretation of subsurface conditions identified during the field exploration program. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the summary logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are only for the specific dates and locations reported and,therefore,are not necessarily representative of other locations and times. A further discussion of the soil and groundwater conditions observed is contained in the text portion of this report. Representative disturbed samples of the soils encountered in the exploratory borings were obtained at selected intervals using a 1.5-inch inside-diameter Standard Penetration Test split-spoon sampler. The sampler was driven up to 18 inches into the undisturbed soil ahead of the drill bit with a 140-lb hammer falling a distance of approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for the final 12 inches of soil penetration, or part thereof, is noted on the boring logs, adjacent to the appropriate sample notation. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boreholes were decommissioned in general accordance with the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-160. 6/14/13 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery Trail FD_fapadoc A-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES . • Soil Classification System a g' uses MAJOR GRAPHIC LETTER TYPICAL DIVISIONS SYMBOL SYMBOL(1) DESCRIPTIONS(2)(3) GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVEL °0 0 0°o GW Well-graded gravel;gravel/sand mixture(s);little or no fines GRAVELLY SOIL ° • • . • • 5 m N (Little or no fines) . .0 0 0 0 Poorly graded gravel;gravel/sand mixture(s); N . + , GP Poor raded ravel; ravel/sand mixtures little or no fines O m > (More than 50%of GRAVEL WITH FINES ` . ' ., ` . W E'N coarse fraction retained . .. '. GM Silty gravel;graveVsand/silt mixture(s) Z (Appreciable amount of ,�+ a v < o 0 on No.4 sieve) fines) ° + ` • GC Clayey gravel;graveVsand/clay mixture(s)•ii,04 o z° SAND AND CLEAN SAND SW Well-graded sand;gravelly sand;little or no fines w m c SANDY SOIL (Little or no fines) cn r L SP Poorly graded sand;gravelly sand;little or no fines s < o zr, (More than 50%of SAND WITH FINES O0 2 m coarse fraction passed (Appreciable amount of SM Silty sand;sand/silt mixture(s)rya through No.4 sieve)) fines) SC Clayey sand;sand/clay mixture(s) Inorganic silt and very fine sand;rock flour;silty or clayey fine p o c N SILT AND CLAY ML sand or clayey silt with slight plasticity y y y i// CL Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity;gravelly clay;sandy 'S a�Th clay;silty clay;lean clay 0 m 0 (Liquid limit less than 50) C Z m w > ` GL Organic silt;organic,silty clay of low plasticity gm S SILT AND CLAY MH Inorganic silt;micaceous or diatomaceous fine sand O o.2 w 2 2 d >1;, CH Inorganic clay of high plasticity;fat clay Z E (Liquid limit greater than 50) LT ��� OH Organic clay of medium to high plasticity;organic silt HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL 10,0104 N1 PT Peat;humus;swamp soil with high organic content GRAPHIC LETTER OTHER MATERIALS SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS PAVEMENT ':"_. ,AC or PC Asphalt concrete pavement or Portland cement pavement ROCK I �� a RK Rock(See Rock Classification) WOOD iists ws edieo�hF WD Wood,lumber,wood chips DEBRIS 'O> D DB Construction debris,garbage Notes: 1. USCS letter symbols correspond to symbols used by the Unified Soil Classification System and ASTM classification methods.Dual letter symbols (e.g.,SP-SM for sand or gravel)indicate soil with an estimated 5-15%fines.Multiple letter symbols(e.g.,MUCL)indicate borderline or multiple soil classifications. 2. Soil descriptions are based on the general approach presented in the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils(Visual-Manual . Procedure),outlined in ASTM D 2488.Where laboratory index testing has been conducted,soil classifications are based on the Standard Test Method for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes,as outlined in ASTM D 2487. 3. Soil description terminology is based on visual estimates(in the absence of laboratory test data)of the percentages of each soil type and is defined as follows: Primary Constituent: >50%-"GRAVEL,""SAND,""SILT,""CLAY,"etc. Secondary Constituents: >30%and<50%-"very gravelly,""very sandy,""very silty,"etc. >15%and<30%-"gravelly,""sandy,""silty,"etc. Additional Constituents: > 5%and<15%-"with gravel,""with sand,""with silt,"etc. < 5%-"with trace gravel,""with trace sand,""with trace silt,"etc.,or not noted, 4. Soil density or consistency descriptions are based on judgement using a combination of sampler penetration blow counts,drilling or excavating conditions,field tests,and laboratory tests,as appropriate. Drilling and Sampling Key Field and Lab Test Data SAMPLER TYPE SAMPLE NUMBER&INTERVAL Code Description Code Description a 3.25-inch O.D.,2.42-inch I.D.Split Spoon PP=1.0 Pocket Penetrometer,tsf b 2.00-inch O.D.,1.50-inch I.D.Split Spoon Sample Identification Number TV=0.5 Torvane,tsf c Shelby Tube PID=100 Photoionization Detector VOC screening,ppm d Grab Sample ,- Recovery Depth Interval W=10 Moisture Content,% e Single Tube Core Barrel 1" I— Sample Depth Interval D=120 Dry Density,pcf %f Double-Tube Core Barrel -200=60 Material smaller than No.200 sieve, /o g 2.50-inch O.D.,2.00-inch I.D.WSDOT \I Portion of Sample Retained GS Grain Size-See separate figure for data h 3.00-inch O.D.,2.375-inch I.D.Mod.California for Archive or Analysis AL Atterberg Limits-See separate figure for data i Other-See text if applicable GT Other Geotechnical Testing 1 300-lb Hammer,30-inch Drop CA Chemical Analysis 2 140-lb Hammer,30-inch Drop Groundwater 3 Pushed 4 Vibrocore(Rotosonic/Geoprobe) Approximate water level at time of drilling(ATD) 5 Other-See text if applicable 1 Approximate water level at time other than ATD Olympic Discovery Trail Figure 14 LANDAU and Waterline Soil Classification System and Key /� 1 _ ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington /"1 I LF_. ; Page aD ' B-1 LAI Project No:193071.010 Moisture Content( SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE PlasUC %) Liquid Li it I I m Llmit 20 40 60 80 ) 7 o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger ♦SPT N-Value n E Y A Non-Standard N-Value A E T T E Ground Elevation(ft): NA @ Z— o C6 0 3 20 40 60 80 . = Ti 3 a o - N Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration c X Fines Content(%)X cri 0 0)06 m I- 0 Logged By: BEC Date: 03/13/13 2 20 40 60 80 —0 '�'�,,� AC Asphalt Pavement(0.35 foot thickness) • • GP- • GM r— Light brown,very sandy GRAVEL with silt, • -o \ crushed rock - o0 GP \ / sP—\ \ (FILL) //-- _ S-1 b2 8 _ \ Light brown,very sandy GRAVEL with trace / - t _A I I ML—\\\silt(loose,moist) J/ E' —5 SM \\ Light brown,fine to medium SAND with I w _ S 2A� b2 5 W-10 _ \\gravel(loose,moist) 1,-- o AO X S-213 GS ML 11\ J z - 1 I Brown,gravelly,fine to medium sandy SILT - \\(medium stiff to stiff,wet) I I ro - JI -0 • Nu W=18 \ Mottled reddish broom and brown,silty, I r- c•S-3 b2 3 SM \1\'graave)y,fine to medium SAND(loose, I/ 2 - I —- 10 1 Light brown,SILT with fine sand,with friable = S-4 b2 8 W-17 SM \ \sandstone clasts(medium stiff,moist) I /— • •' \ L J / - _ \Light brown,gravelly,very silty,fine to / - j GM \ ',medium SAND(loose,wet) / /— _ _ S-5� b2 18 > \\ Light brown grading to gray,silty,gravelly, / _ • / SM/ fine to medium SAND with gray siltstone I CL \\clasts(loose,wet) / —15 / Mottled gray and light brown,sandy,very _ S 6 b2 10 silty GRAVEL(medium dense,wet) _ Light brown,CLAY thinly laminated with thin - Boring Completed 03/13/13 interbedded silty,fine SAND(1/16 to 1 inch Total Depth of Boring=16.5 ft. thickness)(stiff,moist to wet) - (ALLUVIUM) —20 I a.- (9- �_ o- (- Z—25 ce 0- m_ J_ O Co- a - - (7 - o_ 0 0 _ 0 rn—30 o- N - I- U - w O • a _ 2 _ r)- a - co—35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. Et 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 0 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. 0) Olympic Discovery Trail Figure 14 LANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-1 A-2 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington I 1 1' Page (q-p 9 B-2. LAI Project No:193071.010 SAMPLE DATA Moisture Content(%) SOIL PROFILE Plastic I Liquid Limit I-•-I Limit 20 40 60 80 'if, 75 o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger •SPT N-Value w0 Non-Standard N-Value T T Ground Elevation(ft): NA CO 20 40 60 80 @ o . n L a o l Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration c X Fines Content(%)X 2 0 co o6 in .2 I- 0 Logged By: BEC Date: 03/13/13 0 20 40 60 80 -0 V•.' PT Grass Sod - SM - Brown,gravelly,very silty,fine to medium - SAND(dense,wet) - (FILL) - S-1-111 b2 35 W=22 _ • aC GS -5 SP- Gray,gravelly,fine to medium SAND with - SM silt(dense,moist) -• S2 W=7 • b2 42 0 _ II -t • s • GW- Gray,very sandy GRAVEL with silt(medium 2 _ • • GM dense,wet) ` _ S-3 b2 17 • • • __Ili • . • • • - • • - -10 •• • • S-4 b2 11 GS9 ° • ° • • • • • • - • • - W=37 ° e ° with wood = S-5 b2 16 GS • • •• grades to a silty,gravelly SAND• 1 ML \ Gray,SILT with trace root material(soft, J- -15 wet) S-61 b2 3 W=58 _ (ALLUVIUM) • ri n �Sth� OU 'Isl%ck. Light brown,organic SILT with interbedded - t rLa WD !Ireh�: peat and wood(soft,wet) ll'uK�i Levei e .rVtirV `ter^. - -20 srb`'•. - srlshR. • W=73 Ott A x S-7 b2 3 'y_cLu __i!a ✓lint MU Gray,SILT with scattered fine organics,thin - ix - li nh WD interbedded peat,and wood grading to with - _ _ OAn fine sand(soft to medium stiff,wet) - rlo,I - Ohre - ��ry 0 - Si - z -25 �An co_ S-8 b2 4 AA. • o- •.0 0 GP Gray,sandy GRAVEL with trace silt grading - 07 • 0. to with silt(medium dense,wet) - o_ • 0 (OUTWASH) - q •. 0 - p • 0. o- -0- - in-30 • F_ S-9I b2 22 •oo •• 3 - Boring Completed 03/13/13 a - Total Depth of Boring=31.5 ft. z _ c.)_ v- s -35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 0 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. M cc Olympic Discovery Trail Figure 14 LANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-2 A'3 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County, Washington gage ?ems B-3 LAI Project No:193071.010 SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Moisture Content(%) Plastic I Llquid Limfl r ` —1 Lknit 7) �, 7 Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger 20 40 60 80 E a E -a ♦SPT N-Value 3 >` >. NA d n Non-Standard N-Value Z @ o T Ground Elevation(ft): CO 20 40 60 80 cr) L o.a.) a N o s N Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration o o o- E c E 3 a v X Fines Content(/o)X p m Logged By: BEG Date: 03/13/13 20 40 60 80 —0° 0 gulm1"1-\AC/ \Asphalt Pavement(0.25 foot thickness) - ML Mottled reddish brown and light brown, _ sandy SILT with friable siltstone/sandstone _ - clasts(medium stiff,wet) S-1-11 b2 7 (FILL) d _♦ Z - —- 5 § - S2 b2 6 W=16 w I -with fine black organic(charcoal?)streaks o _• • z ML Mottled reddish brown and brown,sandy, m W=10 gravelly SILT(medium stiff,wet) 7 _ • - S-3 b2 7 • o - C9 - -10 SP- Light yellow brown,very — S-4 b2 16 9 Y lt(medium fine to - SM medium SAND with silt(medium dense,wet) _ • - (ABLATION TILL) - SM/ Mottled light brown and light yellow brown, ML SILT with interbedded very silty,fine SAND _-11 S-5A b2 11 _, (stiff and medium dense,wet) ♦ S-5B ML _ J-— - - Light yellow brown,sandy,gravelly SILT with —15 SM \interbedded very fine sandy SILT(stiff,wet) // — S-6 I_ b2 37 Light yellow brown,silty,gravelly,fine to _ • medium SAND grading to silty,fine SAND _ \(dense,wet) Boring Completed 03/13/13 Total Depth of Boring=16.5 ft. —20 i - - - 2, _ - —25 o - do _ J_ 0 a'_ 0 0 N. _ 0 m—30 G - rn 1- 0- w _ 0 cc - a. _ z_ M _ 5- . -i-35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. I-7. 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. rn Olympic Discovery Trail Figure 14 LANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-3 A-4 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County, Washington - !T M f B-4 Page, / , LAI Project No: 193071.010 Moisture Content(%)•SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Ptastc Liquid Limit I • I Limit 20 40 60 80 iv o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger a a> a •o ♦SPT N-Value• E 1 E a 4 Non-Standard N-Value T a E Ground Elevation(ft): NA is Z @ ►- °o rn >, ( ) 3 20 40 60 80 c 2 `m LL f6 o Geologic Drill Exploration n c, a 3 o a Drilled By: 9 P c X Fines Content(%)X m co E m -° a�i `� Logged B BEC Date: 03/13/13 2 0 CO as rn m I- 0 D gg y' 0 20 40 60 80 -0 ! A AC/ \Asphalt pavement(0.25 foot thickness) - lGPJ"-\ / - SM \ Light brown,sandy GRAVEL(crushed rock) / _ - \ (FILL) - Light brown,silty,fine to medium SAND with S 1A b2 21 _ gravel(medium dense,wet) �- 2 - • S-1B� 7 CL _I c - j Light brown,silty CLAY(very stiff,moist to '$ -5 —� wet) _ _ W_13 SM _j W • S-2 b2 6 Mottled light brown,gray,and gray brown, z • silty,gravelly,fine to coarse SAND(loose to iu - - medium dense,wet) o - 1N=11 3 - • X •_ S-3 b2 15 GS 2 • SM Brown,gravelly,very silty,fine to medium _ -10 SAND(very loose to loose,wet) - S-4A illP b2 4 A • S-4B `^^^' PT Dark reddish brown,roots and grass mat _ CL' \ (TOPSOIL) - W=62 Light brown grading to gray green,CLAY • S-5 b2 3 with occasional thin fine organic and vertical A black root-like organics and thin(1/8 to 1.4 inch)silty,fine SAND interbeds(soft,wet) —15 (MARINE DEPOSITS) - S-611 b2 2 a Boring Completed 03/13/13 Total Depth of Boring=16.5 ft. -20 x a - a - 0- x - I-3 - • 0- o - -J U' - K-25 o- m _ J_ • 0 N- a- 0- o_ 0 n _ 0 m-30 o - rnn - H 0 w - u a a _ z - M_ �V - —35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. G. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. 0 m Olympic Discovery Trail Figure 1.4 LANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-4 A'S ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington L ,.,, . o � B_5 LAI Project No:193071.010 Moisture Content(%) SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE PI Liquid Unlit I • I Limit 20 40 60 80 a Z Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger SPT N-Value 1— o T E Ground Elevation(ft): NA A Non-Standard N•Value A z @ o N T 20 40 60 80 a m a m o a co Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration j e X Fines Content(%)X m co m ° CD ``- Logged By:_ BEC Date: 03/13/13 ° o cn aj cn m 1— (9 D (9 20 40 60 80 -0 "-' PT Grass Sod 3 0 GP/ 3 o Sp Light brown,very gravelly,fine to medium _ _ 3 SAND to very sandy GRAVEL(medium 3,o dense,moist)• S 1 b2 23 W-4 D o (FILL) -g -1) A - ;o `m - c - —5 ML Gray green,SILT with fine sand and c _ - - S-2 1 b2 2 W=35 interbedded silty,fine SAND and occasional w thin organics and wood(very soft to soft, 15 A HO wet) - (MARINE DEPOSITS) @ - S-3A� b2 1 ML Light green,SILT with occasional S-3B interbedded silty fine sand and interbedded 0 - _ (2 1/2 inch thickness)PEAT and wood. _ —10 (very soft,wet) — S-41 b2 1 WAL 7 • F--• _ f SM Light brown and gray,very silty,fine to _ _ 3-5 b2 2 W=35 I SM—, medium SAND with trace gravel(very loose, - GS \wet) X• Gray brown,very silty,fine to medium SAND —15 with trace gravel and coarse sand with = W=30 scattered fine organics(very loose to - • S-6 b2 15 medium dense,wet) • u GP/ 0 o SP Black to dark gray,medium to coarse sandy o GRAVEL to gravelly,medium to coarse - - p SAND(medium dense,wet) - 3,c GP- Dark gray,very gravelly,medium to coarse _ —20 3,c c GM SAND with silt(loose to medium dense,wet) W=12 3S `• a _ S7 b2 10 3�c I 3. e 0_3O.0 x - 3 c 3cc - 3 0- c - OH Light brown to brown,organic SILT with _ z —25 abundant fine organics(soft,wet) it �rG m_ S-8 b2 3 W=57 lAl • • d ../././., PT Dark reddish brown,PEAT with wood and a _ m _ v^^^ few fine to medium SAND interbeds(soft, - a - wet) _ o_ aa.SM/ Gray green,sandy SILT grading to very silty, _ o _ ML fine to medium SAND(very stiff/medium _ o - dense,wet) - -30 — G _ S-9A b2 24 SM Gray,silty SAND with trace fine gravel _ • w - S-9B (medium dense,wet) re - Boring Completed 03/13/13 a - Total Depth of Boring=31.5 ft. z _ r, _ a - 5 —35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. Ei 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. M 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. a, Olympic Discovery Trail Figure IALANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-5 A_G ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington /-i VV L._ _ rrr , • P4acle_i_ o-42 , f toe-.3-, B-6 LAI Project No:193071.010 SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Plastic Moisture Content(%) Liquid Limit I—'10-1 Limit 20 40 60 80 a 75 o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger •SPT N-Value• tZ d �) Non-Standard N-Value O z_ oo— cn E Ground Elevation(ft): NA CO 20 40 60 80 L a aZi a tn o a v) Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration c X Fines Content(%)X o in oS co m I— 0 Logged By: BEC Date: 03/14/13 0 8 20 40 60 80 —0 '7-`^^' PT Grass Sod ° :. GM \ (TOPSOIL) r •, r Mottled light brown and reddish brown,silty, _ r sandy GRAVEL(medium dense,wet) S-1 b2 18 W=9 ° • (FILL) 1Z =•• ifi r ! —5 w=5 SP- Light brown,very gravelly,fine to medium ti S-2� b2 33 SM SAND with silt to trace silt(dense,moist to B - • damp) d _ SP- Brown,very gravelly,fine to coarse SAND 3 - W=8 SM with silt and cobbles(dense,moist) -a �X S-3 b2 41 ' • GS 2 = (9 —10 ). GM Dark brown,silty,sandy GRAVEL with trace _• W=11 3 •.) roots(very dense,moist) _ _ S-4 b2 62 3 • a"j • ) ) 3 SM Dark brown,silty,fine to medium SAND with - Itl gravel(medium dense,wet) - S-5 b2 19 • - • 15 SP- Light brown,very gravelly,fine to coarse — 501 50/ W=7 SM SAND with silt(very dense,moist) -�X 2"a, S-6 b2 2" GS u o GP—N (OUTWASH) J o o Light brown,sandy GRAVEL with trace silt 3 0"0 (very dense,damp) - °0 - S-711111 b2 64 O.o o -hard drilling beginning at 16 feet - • o � 0. / I \-drilling refusal with bobcat mounted drill rig —- 20 Boring Completed 03/14/13 _ Total Depth of Boring=19.0 ft. a - a - o- x 3 - o- o_ F-25 o- J_ o- (n - 'a - (7- d_ 0 T.-- _ 0 rn—30 O- io- 0 w - W _ O w - a _ - o, _ ia—35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 0 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. ' 0 Olympic Discovery Trail Figure • I4LANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-6 /�_7 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington /'� • :. ��=a• S:irii.// i. B-7 LAI Project No: 193071.010 SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Moisture Content(%) %astic Lquld Limit I • I Limit a y .� o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger 20 40 60 80 ♦SPT N-Value • a E -�„ Non-Standard N-Value Z $ m CO A Ground Elevation(ft): NA 20 40 60 80 L a a i fl. H o r 0) Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration c d a E c E 3 ° U 3 X Fines Content(/e)X o in— co m 0 Logged By: BEC Date: 03/14/13 2 20 40 60 80 —0 `^^^ PT Grass Sod _ SP- \ /_ SM Light brown,gravelly,fine to coarse SAND _ with silt(medium dense,moist) _ W=5 (FILL) _ S-17111 b2 20 • -5 S-2 11 b2 24 W-7 GS 1X • SP- Light brown to brown,gravelly,fine to W-7 SM coarse SAND with silt(loose to medium S-3)! b2 10 dense,moist) _t —10 _ S-4 f b2 19 W-8 - GS IX♦ \-hard drilling at 12 feet _ SP _ W=3 SM Light brown,very gravelly,fine to medium • 5-5 b2 39 SAND with sift(dense,moist to damp) • (OUTWASH) - —15 ML Mottled light gray brown and reddish brown, _ S 6 b2 28 sandy SILT with gravel(medium dense, moist to wet) -hard drilling at 17 feet ML �— _t - Light brown with iron staining,gravelly, - - sandy SILT(very stiff,moist to wet) _ -large cobble/boulder at 17 feet —20 - = S-7 I b2 24 _ A 0 - I=- - - 'o GP Light brown,sandy GRAVEL with trace silt - o- o (very dense,damp) - U' - 3 0 0 Q _ o —25 I 50/ 3 0 0 — 50/ m _ S 8 b2 5.5" o 0 5.5" -J 3 p _ fO - 0 0. _ a _ 3 0 0. GP Light brown,very sandy GRAVEL with trace - - 3.0 0. silt and cobbles(dense,wet) - 0 0'�0 -sandy zone from about 27 to 29.5 feet o - M_ a.o 6 based on drill action a m —30 0 p. — o - 6 S-9 b2 33 o 0 _ ♦ o - 3 0 0 111_p' 3 O o — 3 0 4 a _ 3 - z _ GM Light brown,sandy,silty GRAVEL?(very v.) _ [[[ dense,wet) _ - _ ia—35 _ 50/ Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. ° 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. M 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. CD Olympic Discovery Trail Figure IALANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-7 A-8 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington (1 of 2) L .. flT Page/ Of ,2 B-7 LAI Project No:193071.010 Moisture Content(%) SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Moisture Limit Limit I�'—I- Limn 20 40 '60 80 a a� s o Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger •SPT N-Value O. I_ .D wN, 20 N-Value Z_ o Ground Elevation(ft): NA CO 20 40 60 80 a Z m `' Geologic Drill Exploration t a a� a ...LL- o a Drilled By: g P c X Fines Content(%)X m m cco o 0 E Logged B BEC Date: 03/14/13 2 o to xs co m I- 0 m gg Y' 0 20 40 60 80 —35 S-10-1-.. b2 50/ ' j GM Light brown,sandy,silty GRAVEL?(very - 3" . 3" ? dense,wet) - y_ _ __ -poor samples recovery for samples S-10 —SP \\and S-11 // _ Gray,medium to coarse SAND?(very _ dense,wet) - 50/ —40 S-11_17C___,b2 501 5••a -\ 5 1 Boring Completed 03/14/13 Total Depth of Boring=40.4 ft. —45 —50 —55 x o.- a _ O J 0- F-60 O J_ cn (n- a- C9- O- o _ n _ 0 m—65 O- co- h- U- w O K - a _ z _ M_ a—70 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. ° 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 0 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. M 0, Olympic Discovery Trail Figure IALANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-7 A-8 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington (2 of 2) YY xa III # -I-- • 7 ` § R''a e - , . B-8 LAI Project No:193071.010 Moisture Content(%) SAMPLE DATA SOIL PROFILE Moisture Lgmd Limit I I L;m;t 20 40 60 80 m 2 Drilling Method: Hollow-Stem Auger 0 ♦SPT N-Value E_ FT o E E. Ground Elevation(ft): NA 0 Non-Standard N-Value 0 To 20 40 60 80 aa) Z. o r rn Drilled By: Geologic Drill Exploration r a fl d a E c E 3 a U 3 X Fines Content(/o)X o coo as co m I-- c� j Logged By: BEC Date: 03/14/13 2 20 40 60 80 —0 \^^^' PT Grass Sod SP- _ - SM Light brown,very gravelly,fine to medium - _ SAND with silt(medium dense,moist) _ (FILL) S-1 711 b2 14 A c - —5 SP- Light brown,very gravelly,fine to coarse _ S-2 b2 21 W=5 SM SAND with silt(medium dense,moist) w GS z • SP- Brown,very gravelly,fine to medium SAND SM with silt and trace organics(medium dense, v S-3 11 b2 27 moist) 'o 0 - —10 3 c c GP- Brown,sandy GRAVEL with silt(medium _ CI 3 c c GM dense,moist) S-4 b2 21 3 c a�c �. r W-8 SP- Brown,gravelly,fine to medium SAND with MU SM silt and trace wood(medium dense,moist) S-5 b2 24 - —15 50/ T-\AC/ \Black,Asphalt Pavement — 60=S 6 lir] b2 6" o c.c GP- c GM Brown and light brown,sandy GRAVEL with c silt grading to silty,sandy GRAVEL(very c dense,moist) - 3 0 c c (OUTWASH) - c j c c -hard drilling at 16 feet _ —20 3.0 C = S-711 b2 12 w=5 c ML Mottled light brown and reddish brown,SILT ♦♦ _ with fine to medium sand and gravel o _ • (medium stiff to stiff,moist) _ x 1- - - - V' - - o_ o-25 50/ W 4 SP- Light brown,very gravelly,fine to coarse 501 m _ S-8 L b2 6" GS i7 SM SAND with silt(very dense,moist) •X VA,� rn- 'a- 0-6_ o_ n_ m—30 SP Light brown,very gravelly,fine.to medium-G_ S-9 b2 94 SAND with trace silt(very dense,moist) _ w- N-drilling refusal with bobcat mounted drill rig. z - ce- Boring Completed 03/14/13 a. - Total Depth of Boring=31.5 ft. z _ M _ v - 5—35 Notes: 1. Stratigraphic contacts are based on field interpretations and are approximate. °• 2. Reference to the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. M 3. Refer to"Soil Classification System and Key"figure for explanation of graphics and symbols. am Olympic Discovery Trail Figure IALANDAU and Waterline Log of Boring B-8 Q_(a ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington /1 �/ L _h1 `r-k APPENDIX B Laboratory Soil Testing 4 t 1/ CJ APPENDIX B LABORATORY SOIL TESTING Soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to characterize certain engineering and index properties of the soils along the project alignment. The laboratory testing program,which was performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM)standard test procedures noted below, was limited to visual inspection to confirm our field soil descriptions, and determination of natural moisture content, grain size distribution, and Atterberg limits. A brief description of the testing performed is presented below. NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT The natural moisture contents of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were determined in general accordance with ASTM D2216 test procedures. The results from the moisture content determinations are indicated adjacent to the corresponding samples on the summary boring logs presented in Appendix A. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS Grain size analyses were conducted on selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings in general accordance with ASTM D422 test procedures. The results are presented in the form of grain size distribution curves on Figures B-1 through B-3. ATTERBERG LIMITS The liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings were determined in general accordance with ASTM D 43,18 test procedures. The tests were conducted on selected fine-grained soil samples for the purpose of classification. The test results are presented on Figure B-4. • 6/14/2013 P:\193\071\FileRm\R\Design\Discovery TrailFD_fapb.doc B-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES ff/ it CO O O c:5 _ c N 2 U) ° N y w c@ U C . :v p LP _ -0 0 0 o - Q o �. N= N CO C o / 0 0. o o N o— / J y Q C �_ O v> N 1.- N = a L > 1 U w Z W N�.6 CO E Q Q Q o N hill ❑U N N C V N C o N m- <n(J) f U o > 5 m 7 .5 O N e- j - n- O LT_ :1 - 7g ; a^ o In o u? 1n _/ 0� a ci o L o O m N fl Q n f6 7 co fn (n fn in V7• y O OO O W N fn 12-A N N N o (n - O m m m m m Z _0 w Z a 0 "5 con E!E E • 8 t * O w . co o O OOi W N. c(00 U cc N O O U 2,g6ia/A Aq Jauid}uaw ed O g • • L 7,_ .T 1 IL CO • 0 o - o - o -a w 2 (;9 cn cn cn a•— cn a. d a 0_ (0 C0 CO C :cj O tu- t CO rp $o _ ,�' ' U / o O = L N I- rrn co. 8 1111111111111111121111111/17d111111111111 :2 . :6:0 N O> w N fB 3 3 N N N C Z 7 L b O d N -o mu v�U m °o 1111PrOl° y CD • Ow a v %i'�, o K m►i All_ , 1 p z O M CO r- r- CO N a iIiUIIIUI11I11h1 as a� � � O c) 0. i O r- to z , �r� U ' � o U O-.fl to M p N O C N 7 (n M O N p C IN- d a. O o N U co y 1§4 t0 (0 p r- r- fn . - N O - m m m m m c x Z a .Q z O M 0 'o v) • B • 4( Q EdW, E. 1 (r) o 0 ° p ° ( ° M ° 0 0 Q co r- co v cV 1g6iaM Aq Jat.0 wowed - g --®.° 2 CO E CO 0 -o Cl) E'N W C) c m C Mv p M .0 >, d N E 0 o L Q >. j o O I o .. N N VJ C cv (L._ V o C N ... ,.. o 0 .,- a I 0 0- C c a O ii o 4-• — J 0) -V N � a) co p ... ...., .... .. .... .... .. ...�.... .... . e� ,N ;N ;,` L t cn z' 03 3 o c a) O C/) E p p 8 a) O CO a_ I g !a l¢ fl CO C 0 N N N O 1 > > 0 N a) — o >> o m ow v 0 6_ Z o LL C N N 7:15 -C O Z c y ,_ _ L C a e o c - p o N ZS En , U C 00 E E m p .. ... (1)Z N• 2 0 C O CO N a = O o f m m z .0 W Z 0 5 E, • B ' b co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �t . O 01 CO n CD to V M CV Q V 146iaM Aq aauid luaaad Sr L v, 60 CL CH 50 40 0 X o 30 to ro ► d 20 10 CL-ML ML or OL MH or OH 0 - 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Liquid Limit(LL) ATTERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Exploration Sample Liquid Plastic Plasticity Natural Unified Soil 5 Symbol Number Number Depth Limit Limit Index Moisture Soil Description Classification (ft) (%) (%) (%) (%) • B-5 S-2 5.0 38 24 14 35 CLAY with fine sand and fine organics CL m B-5 S-4 10.0 49 26 23 47 CLAY with fine sand and fine organics CL w ASTM D 4318 Test Method a c• 0 I 0 rn 0 w 3 0 a z M 0 r; a rn Olympic Discovery Trail Figure LALANDAU and Waterline Plasticity Chart B-4 ASSOCIATES Jefferson County,Washington 1.� EiVi Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Section 7 Consultation �6N OFT / WI 1 Q'1 /);Ne msNawciwrne fa trI4" United States Department of the Interior FM `,... .�ll ,44ei.' 3:°-''' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 Desmond Dr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey,Washington 98503 JAN -- 8 2013 LOG 11-Pry Michelle Walker, Chief Regulatory Branch w' Seattle District,U.S. Corps of Engineers age ....: ATTN: Regulatory Branch(Gardiner) P of P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, Washington 98124-3755 Dear Ms. Walker: Re: Transmittal of Biological Assessment for the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)Puget Sound Coastal Program and National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program staff are working with the North Olympic Salmon Coalition and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to proceed with implementation of the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project. Puget Sound Coastal Program staff prepared a Biological Assessment and submitted it for review and signature as required under USFWS Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Internal Section 7 Consultation procedures and the Programmatic Biological Assessment for Habitat Restoration Activities of the Washington Fish and Wildlife Office(June 2006). Enclosed is the signed"Appendix G Programmatic Biological Assessment Consistency Form for USFWS Restoration Activities" and the"Intra-Service Section 7 Biological Evaluation Form"for the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project. The consultation includes the restoration actions at the site and the associated waterline relocation and Olympic Discovery Trail segment construction. The signed forms document compliance with the Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation requirements for the USFWS, and covers both the USFWS and National.Marine Fisheries Service listed species and Essential Fish Habitat that may occur in the project vicinity. Included in this documentation is a list of Conservation Measures and Best Management Practices required during project implementation in order to comply with Section 7 ESA requirements. We hope that your staff finds these materials helpful and sufficient in completing their Corps of Engineers permit review for the project. Please contact Ginger Phalen of my staff at(360)753- 5819 if you require additional information or have any questions regarding the enclosed document. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincer ly, A(24.B.A, Ken S. Berg, Manager 1-'3'Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Michelle Walker t.t\h. 2 0 Enclosure .- cc: North Olympic Salmon Coalition,Port Hadlock, WA(K. Long) Washington Department of Ecology,Olympia, WA(C.Hemplemann) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,Montesano, WA(K. Guzlas) USFWS R1 Wildlife and Sportfish Restoration Branch,Portland, OR(H. Hollis) Revised September 10, 2012 APPENDIX G Programmatic Biological Assessment Consistency Form for USFWS Restoration Activities Western Washington Version To use this form: For implementation guidelines and requirements, see Chapter 1, Section C of the USFWS Programmatic Biological Assessment(PBA) for Habitat Restoration Activities, dated May 2006. The purpose of the PBA and this form is to: 1) guide you through the section 7 consultation process; 2) encourage critical thinking and project design and implementation that minimize effects to listed species; and 3) document the rational and decision making process used to make the effect determinations. Each project should have the appropriate effect determination. The PBA allows for NE or • NLTAA determinations for terrestrial species,and NE,NLTAA or LTAA for aquatic species. Each determination must be adequately documented in this form. If you need assistance in determining the appropriate effect determination, consult with Division of Consultation and Technical Assistance and NOAA Fisheries staff. Provide information for every item by circling,filling in,or attaching information -as appropriate. 1. General Information Restoration Program: Puget Sound Coastal Program/National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program Restoration Biologist: Ginger Phalen Date: December 30, 2012 Project Name: Discovery Bay Railroad Grade Removal,Beach and Estuary Restoration Cooperative Agreement#: NA FWS Consultation Log#(for project consultation, assigned by CTA): FWS X-REF: 1-3-05-FWF-0167 (Programmatic Consultation Log#) NOAA Fisheries X-REF: WSB -99-084-PBO 2. Project Specific Information Watershed/WRIA: WRIA 17 Hood Canal,Discovery Bay County: Jefferson HUC#and River/Stream Name: Snow and Salmon Creek TRS: T29N RO2W S24 NW River Mile: estuary Tributary to: Discovery Bay Estuary adjacent to Puget Sound G-1 LOG tI EM O (" Washington State Class for Surface Water: Puget Sound Nearshore Marine Waters—Class A Anticipated cfs of stream at time of construction: Estuary-NA Water Ouality Standard that must be met(according to above surface water class and anticipated cfs): NA 3. Attach a Vicinity Map: Include an 8.5 X 11 inch copy of a U.S.Geological Survey (USGS)7.5 minute quad,including the quad name,indicate north direction,and clearly mark the project location on the map. If the project will occur over a distance on a stream or a road,mark the upper and lower limits of the project area. 4. Document Basis of Feasibility Determination e.g., information used-What watershed analysis,limiting factor analysis,restoration strategy or plan was used to select your project. Include information about how your proposed activities address needs identified in these analyses or plan: The project is called for by multiple other management plans or efforts. 1) In the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project(PSNERP): Strategic Restoration Conceptual Engineering Final Design Report(PSNERP 2011),the project area received the highest ranking of A,representing a significanfopportunity to advance nearshore process-based restoration. This site is included in the PSNERP Strategies Report as Coastal Inlet Site 227. It is in Potential Group P8,with a Potential Score of 98. It is in Degradation Group D4, with a Degradation Score of 75. The report recommends the site for restoration. The proposed restoration actions at the site match well with Coastal Inlet Target Processes Restoration(Freshwater Input and Tidal Flow)and Primary Management Measures (Dike/Berm Removal or Modification,Topographic Restoration,Revegetation and Hydraulic Modification). This site is included in the PSNERP Strategies Report as Beach Site 1011. It is in Potential Group P3, with a Potential Score of 84. It is in Degradation Group D13 with a Degradation Score of 51. The report recommends the site for restoration. Restoration plans at the site include the removal of 1250 feet of shoreline armoring,topographic modification of the RR grade,and removal of a creosote RR trestle(overwater structure). 2) In the Hood Canal Lead Entity's 3 year Work Plan(HCCC 2011),the project is specifically listed as a Domain 1 action,which is the highest priority action to be undertaken in the next three years. 3) The Summer Chum Salmon Recovery Plan(HCCC,2005),states: "Protection,restoration and maintenance of Salmon/Snow Creek watersheds are of paramount importance. In both ... watersheds, the lower river sections and the estuaries are targeted for restoration." "These areas must be restored and protected to effect and ensure recovery of the Strait population aggregation." 4) The Salmon Habitat Recovery Strategy for the Hood Canal and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca(HCCC, 2005)ranks the Salmon/Snow watersheds as Tier 1,Priority 1 project areas. 5) The WRIA 17 Salmon Habitat LFA(Correa,2002),covers the Salmon/Snow watershed extensively and identifies the need for removing artificial fill and shoreline armoring,and restoring nearshore and instream processes. By removing the railroad grade between Snow and Salmon Creeks,the project restores historic tidal flow to 16 acres of estuary landward and seaward of the grade. Removing the dredge spoils along the banks of Snow creek restores freshwater flow and connection to 9.9 acres of adjacent high quality salt marsh. Pulling out 3 railroad trestles removes constricting,creosote-laden,overwater structures at the stream mouths. G-2 Lug 1 This site is at the end of a drift cell and at mouths/estuaries of Salmon and Snow creeks. While complete removal of the Maynard railroad grade is not feasible due to risk to an adjacent Olympia oyster population, the modification of the grade into spit like features will create beaches at the end of the drift cell very similar in slope and composition to the beaches immediately adjacent up-drift. These adjacent beaches are known surf smelt and sand lance spawning beaches and the hope is to extend utilization by these fishes into the project site. The project also reconnects a historic re-curved spit interrupted by the railroad grade. 5. Restoration Activities: (check off all that apply) _L4. Restore wetland hydrology _ . Plant native vegetation 10. Remove/setback hydraulic constrictions 6. Project Information a.Project Goals and Objectives: Include or attach a description of the overall goals and objectives of the project. The goals of the project are to restore natural processes,conditions,functions and biological responses to approximately 37.1 acres of shoreline and estuary that have been severely impacted by past development and infrastructure. The project targets restoration of ecosystem processes in a critical coastal inlet and on adjacent beaches. This area provides critical habitat for ESA listed threatened Hood Canal summer chum salmon,listed threatened Puget Sound Chinook salmon,listed threatened Puget Sound steelhead trout, listed Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout, and species of concern Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia coho salmon, cutthroat trout,Olympia oysters,forage fish and migratory shorebirds. Completion of the project will help to restore critical links in the ecosystem that will support all of these species that use this stream and estuary system. b.Project Description: Include or attach a description of the current project area, all phases of the proposed project,including access(existing or new),staging areas, construction, maintenance and operation of the project. Include any additional conservation measures which will be implemented. The Lower Discovery Bay/Snow and Salmon Creeks Restoration Project will restore and enhance natural shoreline forms and processes along approximately 4,400 feet of highly altered shoreline.The entire shoreline area has been modified from historical conditions by the installation of a railway line in 1917, and other associated shoreline fill associated with a veneer peeling mill.These actions have resulted in an artificial shoreline and perturbation of ecosystem processes. The project site property is owned by WDFW and Jefferson Land Trust,and was purchased specifically for restoration and conservation. There are railroad trestles on site that are on Washington Department of Natural Resources property. The WDFW properties were purchased specifically for conservation purposes,with funding from the FWS Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Grant Program. The USFWS National Coastal Wetland Conservation Grant program is providing funding to support restoration work at the site,along with other state funding sources. Public ownership of the property assures long- term public access to an area with abundant opportunity for restoration interpretation and outdoor recreation including fishing,shellfishing,boating,bird watching,bird hunting, and passive recreation. G-3 This is the only public section of shoreline in Discovery Bay. The project site is adjacent to Highway 101 and the Olympic Discovery Trail,giving it high visibility and ease of access. There are several major,human created,problems in the project footprint that have led to degraded habitat for salmon,forage fish and shellfish. These problems all stem from the construction of a railroad grade in 1917 and the filling of mud flats,beaches and estuarine habitats for the construction and operation of a veneer peeling mill. The six major impacts include: 1.An artificial lagoon and mill pond was formed and is now connected with the bay under a 110 foot long creosote railroad trestle.Contaminant leaching from the railroad trestle is occurring directly adjacent to Olympia oyster and productive hardshell clam beds. 2.A small stream and section of the shoreline were isolated from the bay by the railroad grade construction and subsequently this became an isolated fresh water pond(the"Cherry Pond")maintained with a standpipe which drains through a now defunct,perched culvert under the railroad grade into the bay. 3.Beach conditions in the nearshore are degraded due to the presence of large rip-rap armoring the toe of the railroad grade and presence of creosote logs and concrete. The beach is over steepened and the substrate paved with fractured rock rendering it unsuitable for forage fish spawning habitat. 4.There is a defunct tide gate directly adjacent to Olympia oyster beds. 5.Throughout the area there is almost no native marine riparian vegetation,and non-native vegetation dominates. 6.Three fresh-water drainages from the adjacent hillside are piped through the railroad berm straight to the bay. 7. 1,700 feet of railroad grade and three creosote trestles bisect the Salmon and Snow Creek estuaries impeding habitat forming processes and burying critical habitat for ESA listed species. 8. Sidecast dredge spoils and the formation of a delta-cone at the mouth of Snow Creek isolate the mouth of Snow Creek from natural connections to the adjacent saltmarsh/estuary. 9.A privately operated waterline that is installed in the railroad grade will be relocated as part of the project to allow construction of restoration elements. 8.The Olympic Discovery Trail,a regional trail system,had hoped to use the railroad grade as a trail bed; however,because this alignment did not allow for robust restoration,a new alignment has been assigned along Highway 101.Due to equal interests in the trail,waterline,and in restoration,the waterline and trail will be constructed in concert with the construction of the restoration project,as funding allows. There are five major components of the project: 1. Removal of 1,465 feet of railroad grade around and between Salmon and Snow creeks,including 3 creosote-laden railroad trestles,and the buried private waterline. This will restore 16 acres of salt marsh and estuary. The railroad grade currently functions as a dike/berm which bisects the estuary,constricts the steam mouths and disrupts ecosystem processes. 2. In the Snow Creek estuary,side cast dredge spoils and the delta cone will be removed and tidal channels will be constructed,restoring 9.9 acres of salt marsh and estuary. 3. In the"Maynard"area of the project, (northeast of the Snow and Salmon creek estuaries) 1,250 of shoreline armoring, 11,160 cubic yards of nearshore fill,and one railroad trestle will be removed, along the 1,760 feet of the abandoned railroad grade that had been constructed on former tideflats. G-4 a Fir PAA This action will restore a shoreline with 2 acres of restored beach faces;2 acres of spits;a 1 acre pocket estuary;4.8 acres of estuarine intertidal habitat;and 3 creek mouth junctions with Discovery Bay. 4. The relocation of 3,200 feet of private waterline infrastructure currently aligned along the existing railroad grade that will be removed as described under#1.,above. This waterline relocation has to be completed as part of the overall project. The waterline will be moved to follow the State Route (SR) 101 Right-of-Way. The Olympic Discovery Trail described below,will follow the waterline alignment,and will allow for trail connection adjacent to the project area. The relocation of the waterline and the trail construction are two activity types that are not covered under the FWS Habitat Restoration programmatic consultation,and will be covered under the attached Intra- Service Section 7 Biological Evaluation Form. 5. Planting of 3.4 acres of marine riparian area with native trees and shrubs,will support low and high salt marsh establishment in the footprints of removed railroad grade and the Snow Creek side cast spoils/delta cone removal area. Other associated actions embedded in the above include: Removal of a standpipe and defunct culvert and tidegate currently in the railroad grade between the mill pond and the lagoon;removal of a barn and 2 outbuildings,all currently in a high level of decay,and removal of a septic system on lands owned by Jefferson Land Trust in the southern portion of the project area,adjacent to Snow Creek. Most of the activities at this project site are fill removal actions. Some restoration project elements will require backfilling. When the defunct tidegate is removed,the resulting hole in the area will be filled with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent railroad grade. In places where the beach surface has become armored with cobble or concrete spilling from the railroad grade,this material will be over-excavated and replaced with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent railroad grade. There are no anticipated adverse impacts to any waterbodies on the site,wetland or stream.The goal of the restoration project is to return nearshore functions to as close to historic as possible and enhance and increase resilience of the site where conditions cannot be recreated. Site Specific Restoration Best Management Practices: 1) Excavation areas are typically adjacent to tide waters of Discovery Bay. Excavation will not occur in water. Where tidal influence is present,excavation work will be completed only when the site is not inundated by tide waters.The contractor will use caution mobilizing and demobilizing. Shoreline grading,bulkhead removal,and railroad grade removal will occur from the railroad grade so that machinery will not need to travel below Ordinary High Water(OHW). Silt fences and other erosion control measures will be installed around all activities that involve dredge,fill,stockpiling or structural removal. 2) All work will conform to local,state and federal agency requirements. 3) The approved in-water work window will be adhered to as required by the Hydraulic Permit Approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 4) The contractor will verify that the existing waterline has been decommissioned prior to any grading or clearing. 5) The contractor will verify all clearing limits with the project engineer prior to any G-5 vegetation removal. 6) A de-watering system,including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals,and any fill removal adjacent to streams. 7) Creosote trestle bridges will be removed following Best Management Practices and Specifications developed by the Washington State DNR on similar creosote removal projects. 8) NOSC will have a project manager on site during construction activities. 9) Access and phasing is very important to performing work at appropriate tidal stages. NOSC will require that the contractor submit a detailed project schedule that will require them to think through all of the steps and how they will be executed with consideration given to the tidal cycle. 10)Prior to restoration actions below the MHHW along the marine shorelines,the harvestable shellfish resource in the project footprint will be harvested by local tribes. These resources will be reseeded post project by WDFW. Olympia oysters in the project footprint will be temporarily relocated during project construction. To date,forage fish spawning surveys conducted at the site have not detected surf smelt or sand lance spawn. Maynard Nearshore Restoration Area: The first phase of work in the Maynard area is the removal of the 110 foot-long creosote railroad trestle spanning the opening into the lagoon. Washington Department of Natural Resources best management practices for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the project specifications, and the contractor is required to submit a"bridge removal plan"that will follow the best management practices. Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent railroad grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Except for the extraction of sub-tidal pilings on the railroad trestle,all work will occur in the dry. The second phase of construction will be the earthwork to remove and modify the railroad grade beginning at the northeast end,and working along the grade. When excavation and grading is required below MHHW it will occur in the dry and be performed from the railroad grade. Railroad grade removal will take place in sections. In a given section during one low tide cycle, the contractor will remove bulkheads,excavate and remove fill,over-excavate unsuitable beach material and backfill with appropriate beach substrate so that by the time the tide returns,the beach will be in its desired configuration. A total of 11,160 CY of fill will be removed from and adjacent to the waterbodies in this area,positively impacting 1,850 linear feet. Approximately 5,160 CY of suitable fill will be used onsite in this area,to create a backshore hill that will be planted with native plants. In addition a culvert,approximately 2,500 tons of shoreline armoring rubble,and a defunct tidegate and associated fill(10 CY),all embedded in or adjacent to the railroad fill will be removed and disposed of properly. The third phase of construction will be the dewatering and breaching of the Cherry Pond and re- contouring of the railroad grade. The contractor will be required to submit for an engineers' approval a creek diversion and pond dewatering plan prior to performing the work. At the Cherry Pond site,330 CY of railroad grade fill will be removed to reconnect the Cherry Pond with the marine shoreline. The creek feeding the Cherry Pond will be diverted and the pond drained using dewatering best management practices prior to the breaching of the railroad grade. The railroad grade will be removed with excavators,loaded into dump trucks and hauled to a permitted upland disposal site. All work will occur in the dry during low tide cycles. G-6 Page The fourth phase of construction, which could occur at any time as convenient,is the enhancement of salt marsh benches at the mouth of the two small freshwater drainages at the south end of the project. All excavation will take place in the dry during low tides. The sensitive nature of the grading and site in general makes contractor experience critical. NOSC will hire qualified contractors with experience working in tidal areas. There are many aspects of the grading that will benefit from field supervision by an individual with authority to make field adjustments. The project manager will be onsite to address these needs. A portion of suitable excess fill will be use onsite. Excess and unsuitable fill will be hauled off site to an appropriately permitted disposal or reuse area provided by the contractor. Proof of a permitted disposal site will be required from contractors in order to submit a bid. Post project construction, the site will be planted with native species as plans direct. Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Area: At the Snow Creek site approximately 23,000 CY.of fill will be removed from the railroad grade, side-cast spoils and delta-cone areas. These actions will restore the marsh to its historic configuration. The material will be removed with excavators,loaded into dump trucks and hauled to an adjacent upland site for disposal. All work will occur in the dry. The first phase of work at the Snow Creek estuary restoration area is the removal of three creosote railroad trestles. Washington Department of Natural Resources best management practices for creosote piling removal in marine waters are included in the project specifications,and the contractor is required to submit a"bridge removal plan"that will follow the best management practices. Removal will be accomplished from the adjacent railroad grade using a crane and vibratory extractor to pull piles. Work will occur at low tides. Streamflows will be diverted and areas dewatered as feasible to allow piles to be pulled in isolated areas. The second phase of work will be removal of the railroad grade between Salmon and Snow Creeks and the Snow Creek delta cone and sidecast dredge spoils adjacent to the creek. There will be no in-water work associated with the fill removal. Fill removal will be timed to occur at tides lower than the excavation work. Excavation in a given area will be completed on a single tidal cycle so that returning tidal waters will flow across the final graded surface. Removed fill will be sorted and either disposed in an upland on-site area,and/or used to fill in benches in the landscape. Any unsuitable fill will be trucked to an offsite,permitted location. After project construction,the site will be planted with native species. Estuarine areas will be left unplanted as these areas quickly recruit native saltmarsh vegetation from neighboring stock. Any on-site upland fill areas will be replanted with native shrubs and trees. c.Footprint of Project Area: If you have multiple sites within a project,you will need to delineate out the sites and supply information for each site. If you will not be affecting a habitat type,delete it or put NA. Add supporting text in the Notes section as needed to describe any activity or impact. G-7 • Page 1 � Riparian area planted: 1.4 acres estuarine riparian area in the Maynard project area,and 2 acres in the Snow Creek Project area,on the spoils pile that will be created from channel dredge spoils as appropriate. Riparian area removed: Most of the existing overstory vegetation within the estuarine riparian area is non-native and will be removed along with the fill associated with the railroad grade removal. Other vegetation that will be removed is associated with the nearshore fill removal and includes low weedy grasses and other forbs in the Snow Creek estuary,approximately 9 acres,and approximately ih acre of overstory trees in the Snow Creek estuary. All areas will be replanted as called for in the project design plans. Intertidal/Estuarine acreage directly impacted: 37 acres 7. Habitat Description: a.Percentage of vegetation type or land cover in the project area: Estuarine 100% b.Provide a text description of vegetation type in the project area. The restoration site is categorized as a`terrestrial/nearshore marine' type.Upland vegetation in the restoration project areas is r_enerall corn rised of invasive w-ed s•- ies with some ounl alder.Bel.w the hi l h tid line areas of the project area contain high salt marsh plant communities. c.If trees are present,estimate the current canopy closure: NA-trees are present,but very dispersed.or clumped in locations around the Snow Creek stream channel. Will trees be felled/removed/modified? Yes X No If yes,provide the number, size, species and area affected (acres) All of the trees that will be removed are presently growing on nearshore fill.and all of these trees are young alders. The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project removes 656 2-6"alders, 110 6-10" alders.and 9 12-16"alders that are growing on the dredge spoils along the banks of Snow Creek. These trees will be replaced by naturally recruiting salt marsh community that is natural at the site. Explain why trees will be felled/removed/modified: Trees to be removed are all located on nearshore fill or structures that are being removed as part of the restoration of the estuary. d.Will other vegetation be modified? Yes X No If yes, estimate amount of modification in acres and describe the plant community and age class: Approximately 10 acres of the railroad grade and associated uplands infested with invasive species will be cleared during the restoration.Where subtidal these areas will recruit native saltmarsh vegetation,where upland the areas will be planted in a native shrub/tree community. e.Slope distance from project to nearest water body(stream,wetland, and lake): All project activities will occur in the estuary and most of the actions will be adjacent to or nearby watercourses, streams,bays,mud and tideflats. f.Will an active water body be entered, diverted or altered? Yes X No G-8 1 rya? Page If yes,Name: Work will occur in tidal areas adjacent to Salmon and Snow creeks and the Discovery Bay estuary. Excavation areas are typically adjacent to tide waters of Discovery Bay. Excavation will not occur in water. Where tidal influence is present.excavation work will be completed during low tide cycles, when the site is not inundated by tide waters.Contractor will use caution mobilizing and demobilizing., Shoreline grading,bulkhead removal,and railroad grade removal will occur from the railroad grade so that machinery will not need to travel below Ordinary High Water(011W). Silt fences and other erosion control measures will be installed around all activities that involve dredge,fill, stockpiling or structural removal. Any work in active stream channels will use an approved stream diversion and/or dewatering plan. All work will conform to local,state and federal agency requirements.The approved in-water work windows for both marine and fresh water will be adhered to as required by the Hydraulic Permit Approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the USFWS. g.Have you obtained the HPA for inwater work? Yes X The HPA is currently in review process. If Yes, please attach. h.If you are entering, diverting or altering an active water body, are you following the Fish Capture and Dewatering Protocol in Appendix H? Yes No X NA_ If no,provide justification why the protocol does not need to be used. An approved de-watering system.including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals,and any, fill removal adjacent to streams or the shoreline. For the work that entails adjacent work to water,areas will be isolated from other waters and dewatered and any remaining fish will be removed. The trestle removals at Salmon Creek and the Maynard project area will involve piling removal. Most of the piles will be pulled in the dry during low tide cycles. However,there are some piles in each trestle that will remain in water even during low tide cycles. These piles will be removed following the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Derelict Creosote Piling Removal Best Management Practices and the Hydraulic Project Approval for Creosote Piling and Structural Removal(see attached).For example at Salmon Creek,due to continually running waters of the creek through the site.-a silt curtain will be installed up and downstream of the piles,fish will be removed within the area, and the pilings will be pulled via vibratory extraction. Following these practices and protocols will decrease the impacts to the, streambed and any sediment mobilization that would occur if the areas were dewatered. i.If you are widening a road to either accommodate a new culvert or bridge or are widening the road for safety concerns in conjunction with a new culvert or bridge,quantify and explain the increased impervious surface created as a result of this activity. NA 8. Project Schedule Project construction start date: June 2013 Project construction end date: June 2015 Expected duration of project construction(#of days/month): Work will occur during in-water work windows and low tide cycles of 2013,2014 and 2015. The waterline system and potentially the trail (contingent on funding)will be constructed the first year,with the restoration components following in 2014.and 2015. It is anticipated that in-water work windows and weather will allow for most of the restoration construction to occur within the summer and fall of 2014. There will be two distinct restoration project areas.the Maynard Nearshore Area and the Snow Creek Estuary Area. Each of these areas will G-9 i Page .1, 01 /I have individual implementation schedules that will be designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. Work will occur following both freshwater and marine water timing windows as appropriate. Freshwater work within and adjacent to Salmon and Snow Creek channel will occur from July 15 through August 15,and marine work along the Salmon and Snow Creek estuaries and the Maynard nearshore area will occur July 15 to February 15. Work timing information is the following: • Trail and waterline work- 4-6 weeks with 20-30 working days, • Snow Creek project area work- 10 weeks and 50 working days • Maynard project area work- 10 weeks and 50 working days. Work could occur simultaneously in the Snow Creek and Maynard project areas. Total#days'of project implementation: up to 130 working days total 9. Noise Generation: Total#days of activity with above ambient noise: 0 days Start date for above ambient noise generation: End date for above ambient noise generation: Explain what equipment will generate noise above ambient levels,for what time period during the day and for how many days. The project site is directly adjacent and near to SR101 and SR 20. Any noise generated by heavy equipment used for restoration actions will not be oyer and above noise generated by traffic along the highway corridor. 10. All 19 General BMPs apply (See Enclosure B -Appendix B. General and Restoration Activity Specific Best Management Practices). All restoration activities implemented under the programmatic consultation will incorporate the following 19 general BMPs to reduce impacts on ecosystems,listed species and their habitats: 1. All regulatory permits and official project authorizations(e.g.,National Environmental Policy, National Historic Preservation Act,Level I Contaminants Survey,WDFW's Hydraulic Project Approvals and permits from the Army Corps of Engineers,etc.)must be secured before project implementation. All terms and conditions in these regulatory permits and other official project authorizations must be followed to eliminate or reduce adverse impacts to any endangered,threatened,or sensitive species or their critical habitats. 2. Modifications to an approved work plan must be reviewed and approved by the project biologist and the cooperators and/or landowner(s)before the work can be carried out or continued. This includes changes requiring modifications of permits,or alterations to the scope,design,or intent of the project. 3. Use existing roadways or travel paths for access to project sites. No new roads or other temporary access roads will be built for access to project sites. If a new road needs to be built G-10 for access to a project site,that activity is not covered under this PBA and a separate section 7 consultation will need to be completed. See restoration activity 7—Improve Road/Trail Conditions and BMPs 36 and 37 for guidance on relocated or replacement roads. 4. Avoid the use of heavy equipment and techniques that will result in excessive soil disturbances or compaction of soils,especially on steep or unstable slopes. 5. Use of heavy equipment in or adjacent to streambeds and streambanks,and ingress/egress points must be minimized to reduce sedimentation rates,channel instability,and aquatic habitat impacts. Vehicles and machinery must cross streams at right angles to the main channel whenever possible. Heavy equipment will be cleaned(e.g.,power washed,steamed, etc.)prior to use below the ordinary high water mark. Machinery will be inspected for leaks of hydraulic fluid or fuel after cleaning and prior to entering sensitive areas. 6. Excavation or transport equipment/machinery will be limited in capacity,but sufficiently sized to complete required restoration activities. 7. Streams,riparian zones,and wetlands must not be used as equipment staging or refueling areas. Equipment must be stored,serviced,and fueled in a contained area that is at least 150 feet away from aquatic habitats or other sensitive areas. Prior to project construction,critical riparian vegetation areas,wetlands,and other sensitive sites will be flagged to prevent ground disturbance. 8. In the riparian area,entry and disturbance by equipment will be minimized. If the activity will remove vegetation from an area greater than 50 linear feet, within an area that may impact channel shade or temperature,the project biologist will contact NMFS and USFWS CTA staff to jointly determine how the project would avoid likely significant impacts to channel shade or temperature in areas critical to steelhead salmonid, and bull trout migration, spawning or rearing and provide documentation of,the agreement in the Appendix G.PBACF. Cable systems will be used,where appropriate,to eliminate or reduce the'need for ground-based equipment. 9. Native vegetation will be planted on disturbed sites(including project site,disposal and staging areas,and access roads)within three days of the end of construction,given appropriate planting seasons,or will be covered or otherwise stabilized with appropriate erosion and sediment control measures. Planting shall be completed no later than April 15 of the year following construction. Vegetative planting techniques must not cause major disturbances to soils and slopes. 10. Boulder,rock,and large woody debris materials used for restoration projects must not be removed from any streams. 11. All construction activities shall comply with water quality standards(RCW 940.48 and WAC 173-201A)set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology. If the USFWS or our project partners anticipate that water quality standards will be exceeded,then we or our project partners shall seek a Temporary Water Quality Modification Permit from the Washington Department of Ecology. A Pollution and Erosion Control Plan(PECP)will be developed for G-11 Page each authorized project to prevent point-source pollution related to construction operations. Sedimentation and erosion controls(e.g.,straw bales, silt fences)will be implemented on all project sites where restoration activities are implemented,materials or equipment is staged or stockpiled,or fill is placed,to minimize the release of fines into the aquatic environment(See Appendix J for proper installation techniques for hay bales,silt fences etc.). Effective erosion control measures will be in place at all times during the project,and will remain and be monitored and maintained until such time that permanent erosion control measures are effective. 12. Excavated materials removed during the completion of a restoration activity must be salvaged and/or disposed of properly and/or stabilized to eliminate future environmental problems. 13. All garbage from work crews must be removed from the project site daily and disposed of properly. All waste from project activities must be removed from the project site before project completion and disposed of properly. 14. Structures containing concrete must be cured or dried before they are placed in streams, riparian zones,or wetlands. Creosote-treated wood,or other treated wood will not be used. Wet concrete or runoff from cleaning tools that have wet concrete slurry or lye dust must never enter aquatic habitats. Runoff control measures must be employed,such as hay bales and silt fences,until the risk of aquatic contamination has ended. 15. Inspection will be performed within 1 year following project completion to ensure that restoration activities implemented at individual project sites do not create unintended consequences to fish,wildlife,plant species,and their critical habitats. Corrective actions, as appropriate,must be taken for potential or actual problems. 16. Soil and/or slope disturbances along stream channels should be eliminated or reduced wherever possible, Undisturbed vegetated buffer zones will be retained along stream channels to the greatest extent possible to reduce sedimentation rates,channel instability,and impacts to aquatic habitat. 17. Till unvegetated compacted road surfaces to promote vegetation establishment and growth. Drainage improvements should be constructed and stabilized before the rainy season. Do not sidecast excavated road materials;avoid accumulating or spreading these materials in upland draws,depressions,intermittent streams,and springs. Efforts will be made to restore the original hydrology of the site. 18. Fill material used on project sites must be from non-streambed and non-wetland sources that are free of a large amount of fines. 19. Entry into the stream channel will be minimized to the greatest extent possible during project design,collection of information,implementation,or pre-or post-project monitoring. Project implementers,contractors,stream surveyors and others will stay out of the stream channel as much as possible. If a stream crossing for vehicle or livestock access is included in the project design,WPR project biologists or other local agency biologists will conduct a survey and create a map of potential spawning habitat at the stream crossing. If and when entry into G-12 • s the channel is necessary,spawning areas will not be disturbed. EFFECT DETERMINATIONS, NON-FISH SPECIES Steps and Guidance for filling out the Non-Fish Species and Fish Species Sections. 1. Prior to completing this form, obtain a species list for the project. Follow the steps below to generate a species list. a. Get a County species list from the Share drive. b. Work with GIS staff to generate a list of species occurrences for the project area and "vicinity of activity". c. Mesh the project area list of species occurrences with the County species list. d. Review the species list and evaluate the project area and "vicinity of activity"for the presence or absence of species. This should include evaluation for potentially suitable habitat. e. Remove species from the species list when habitat is not available for the species in the project area or"vicinity of activity". If you need assistance with this decision,work with the appropriate species expert contact. f. Once the species list is finalized, only those species that occur on the list will need to be included in the PBACF. If a species is not on the species list,it can be removed from the PBACF. 2. Species found across the State are indicated by"E-W" prior to the species name. Species found only in western Washington are indicated by a"W", and species found only in eastern Washington are indicated by an "E". If the project occurs in western Washington, eliminate all eastern Washington species, and if the project occurs in eastern Washington, eliminate all western Washington species. • 3. For question a)is the species known to be in the vicinity of the activity? No_.._.Yes_Not known_; Not known is used if you don=t know if the species is present or absent. If you select Not known,you must assume presence. 4. "Vicinity of activity" generally equals a 1 mile radius around the project site. 5. Each project should have the appropriate effect determination. The PBA allows for NE or NLTAA determinations for terrestrial species,and NE,NLTAA or LTAA for aquatic species. Each determination must be adequately documented in this form. If you need assistance in determining the appropriate effect determination, consult with Division of Consultation and Technical Assistance and NOAA Fisheries staff. G-13 / 6. For the species listed below, if all conservation measures pertaining to the species and the activity are implemented, the conservation measures are adequate to ensure effect determinations documented in the PBAIBO. If you do not implement all conservation measures,you must explain why in the Notes section. 7. For conservation measures for each species see Enclosure C: Appendix L-Conservation Measures for Listed Species. THREATENED ANIMALS E-W Marbled murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) a) Is there suitable habitat within 0.25 miles of the project site? No X Yes b) Have surveys to protocol been conducted in the project vicinity? No X Yes If surveys have been conducted, describe or attach survey information and results: Occupied Not Occupied Presence (presence of murrelets was noted, but they were not showing occupied behavior) c) Will the activity generate noise above ambient levels within 0.25 mile(1.0 mile if blasting)of unsurveyed suitable or occupied nesting or foraging habitat? No X Yes If yes, apply MM 1. d) Will the activity use aircraft within 0.25 mile of suitable or occupied nesting or foraging habitat? No X Yes If yes,apply MM2. e)Will the activity remove trees with suitable nesting habitat structure? No X Yes If yes, apply MMCH1 and document discussion and rationale for the effect call in the Notes section. f) In critical habitat, will the activity modify the stand habitat? No X Yes If yes, apply MMCH2 and document discussion and rationale for the effect call in the Notes section. g) Outside of critical habitat will the activity modify the stand habitat? No X Yes G-14 Page If yes, apply MMCH3 and document discussion and rationale for the effect call in the Notes section. h) Notes: Project actions occur in the estuarine area of Salmon and Snow Creeks and Discovery Bav,in north Puget Sound,Strait of Juan de Fuca. Project actions will not generate noise above ambient as the project site is adjacent to SR101 and SR 20. Any designated critical habitat for murrelets is over 5 km from the project site. Murrelets are known to use Discovery Bay for foraging;however it is not likely that they use the nearshore estuarine area where this work will occur. Additionally all water adjacent work will occur during appropriate tidal cycles, and no in-water work will occur. It is not likely that any foraging marbled, murrelets will be impacted by project actions, Any noise disturbance will not be above current site levels. This nearshore restoration effort will improve the quality and condition of the habitat within the project area,and support recovery of nearshore ecosystem processes and functions. These actions may provide benefits to foraging murrelets by boosting the environmental support system for the marine food chain. i) Conservation Measures to be applied: MM1 MM2 MMCH1 MMCH2 MMCH3 None X j) Effect Determination: NLTAA marbled murrelets Effect Determination: NE designated critical habitat for the marbled murrelet • G-15 Page rY RECENTLY DELISTED SPECIES E-W Bald eagle(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) The bald eagle was removed from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered Wildlife, effective August 8,2007. As of August 8, 2007,bald eagles are a species of concern and are protected under federal laws, including The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,and The Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Further information is on the Internet at: http://wwwfws.gov/pacific/eagle/index.html There are links there to guidance for avoiding disturbance for various activities under"Will my Activity Disturb Bald Eagles" and links to the MBTA and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act under "Eagle Regulation and Guidance" Staff using this Appendix G. PBACF consultation process will alert our project partners to this change in the eagles' status, and assist them with ensuring that applicable federal laws are followed. For the Effect Determination, use NA for not applicable. a) Identify any bald eagle habitat in project vicinity: Known/suspected nest territory occupied night roost key winter foraging area known or suspected perch site None X b) Will the activity generate above ambient noise within 660 feet of a known or suspected bald eagle nest territory, occupied night roost or key winter foraging area? No X Yes c) Will the activity include use of explosives within Vz mile of a known or suspected bald eagle nest territory, an occupied night roost or key winter foraging area? No X Yes Not Known d) Will the activity alter or remove trees within 660 feet of a known or suspected bald eagle nest territory, occupied night roost or key winter foraging area? No X Yes If yes to b,c,or d, obtain Species Lead Initials: Document outcome in the e)Notes. e) Notes: Project Manager checked with Colleen Stinson on status of eagles within the site vicinity. The nearest nest is approximately 2 miles to the east of the project site,and there are no known communal roosts in the vicinity of the proiect. f) Effect Determination: NA bald eagles G-16 1 7 , K4 Page4... ._.. ___ CONCURRENCE: \AA,0,0,‘A.6.- V ' 20(3 s Project Biolo D to/7 6,4,6(— 1 1 -Z 1 Manager, Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Date No " I vL- WC-eSS A r Manager, Division of Consultation &Technical Assistanc Date G-17 Paw.? ar EFFECT DETERMINATIONS,FISH SPECIES If project work is in marine environments,CHECK the NMFS website and contacts below to evaluate potential impacts to NMFS other listed,species that are currently not covered under this PBA. Attach documentation as needed. Boccacio and canary and yelloweye rockfish: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Other-Marine- Species/Puget-Sound-Marine-Fishes/ESA-PS-Rockfish.cfm Southern resident killer whales: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Whales- Dolphins-Porpoise/Killer-Whales/Index.cfm Eulachon (Columbia River Smelt): httD://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Other-Marine- Species/Eulachon.cfm North American green sturgeon: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Other-Marine-Species/Green- Sturgeon.cfm Each project should have the appropriate effect determination. The PBA allows for NE or NLTAA determinations for terrestrial species,and NE,NLTAA or LTAA for aquatic species. Each determination must be adequately documented in this form. If you need assistance in determining the appropriate effect determination,consult with Division of Consultation and Technical Assistance and NOAA Fisheries staff. Currently listed evolutionarily significant units(ESUs) or distinct population segments (DPSs). Check all that may occur in the fifth field watershed that the project occurs in. NOTE: NMFS listed species Puget Sound Chinook Salmon and designated critical habitat, Hood Canal Summer Chum Salmon and designated critical habitat, and Puget Sound Steelhead Trout are all covered in the attached Self Certification of Proposed Habitat Restoration Activity Consistency with the Habitat Restoration Program, 4(d) rule, Limit 8. Other NMFS listed marine species including boccacio, canary rockfish,yelloweye rockfish and southern resident killer whales and their designated critical habitat are covered under the attached Intra-Service Section 7 Biological Evaluation Form. Threatened X Bull trout, Coastal/Puget Sound DPS (Salvelinus confluentus) Designated X Critical habitat for Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout DPS G-18 Pa Cr4 I Fill out this section for bull trout. Effect Determination by Species(USFWS) DPS and designated critical habitat: Bull trout Coastal Puget Sound DPS,and designated critical habitat 1) Does the restoration activity require an HPA? YES X If yes, attach the HPA. Apply conservation measure Fl. In the Notes section below, document any ambiguity between the PBO and HPA and how the issue was resolved. Go to question 2. NO If no, go to question 2. Fl. When the restoration activity requires a Hydraulic Project Approval permit(HPA), an HPA will be secured and conditions will be followed. Any ambiguities related to permit conditions will be cleared up prior to construction. Notes: The HPA is currently in process.All terms and conditions of the HPA will be followed by the project implementers. 2) Is the project in a watershed/water body where bull trout have been documented to occur or that supports or has habitat with the potential to support bull trout? For the Coastal Puget Sound bull trout DPS all core areas and FMO habitat, including all local populations and potential local populations and Whatcom Creek, Squalicum Creek, Willapa Bay and the mainstem Willapa River should be considered to have bull trout potentially present, as identified in the Draft Recovery Plan for the Coastal-Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout, volumes I and II. Use draft recovery plan, maps,or consult with bull trout species leads to determine answer. Note: Whatcom and Squalicum creeks and Willapa Bay and the Mainstem Willapa River have all had recent bull trout sitings,but are currently not included in a designated core area of FMO habitat. YES _X_ If yes, go to question 2a. Identify the fifth field watershed or water body. Unit=Olympic Peninsula,subunit=Strait of Juan de Fuca,Marine Nearshore NO Identify the fifth field watershed or water body. The effect determination for bull trout is "no effect". Go to question 6. G-19 Al/9 a. Is the project in Whatcom Creek,Squalicum Creek,Willapa Bay or the mainstem Willapa River? YES Identify the fifth field watershed or water body. If yes, go to question 2.f. NO X_ If no, go to question 2b. b. Is the project within the area covered by the PBA for bull trout? See Enclosure D. Table 4.4.Coastal Puget Sound and Columbia River Bull Trout DPS's Core Areas,Local Populations and FMO Areas Covered by the PBA, and "Key Habitat for Bull Trout Recovery"maps. YES _X_ Identify the bull trout management or recovery unit: Unit=Olympic Peninsula. subunit=Strait of Juan de Fuca,Marine Nearshore If yes, go to question 2.c. NO If no,the project is not covered by the PBA for bull trout and an individual consultation should be completed. c.Does the project occur in a bull trout core area? YES Identify the bull trout core area: If yes,go to question 2.d. NO _X_ If no, go to question 2.e. d.Does the project occur within a local population area(spawning and early rearing)within the above identified core area? YES Identify the local population area: Apply BTI. Go to question 2f. NO By default,the project occurs in feeding, migration, and overwintering(FMO) habitat within the above identified core area. Check with bull trout staff for appropriateness of in-water work windows identified in the HPA and apply or make changes as appropriate. Document the discussion and agreement in the Notes section below. Go to question 2f. Notes: e.Does the project occur in bull trout FMO habitat outside of a core area? See Enclosure D. Table 4.4. Coastal Puget Sound and Columbia River Bull Trout DPS's Core Areas,Local G-20 Populations and FMO Areas Covered by the PBA, and "Key Habitat for Bull Trout Recovery"maps. YES X_ Identify the bull trout FMO area: Unit=Olympic Peninsula, subunit=Strait of Juan de Fuca. Marine Nearshore Apply BT3. Go to question 2f. BT3. In-water work will only occur during the timing windows identified in Appendix F.2,when the in- water restoration activity occurs in the following water bodies: the Duwamish Waterway,Lake Union and the Ship Canal,Lake Washington,Sammamish Basin,Columbia River Mainstem or in marine nearshore and estuarine areas. This conservation measure supersedes conservation measure Fl when conducting in- water restoration activities in the above mentioned areas. NO Go to question 3. f.Is there exposure of bull trout to project activities? Please explain your answer. (Project timing or location could impact this). If there is not exposure to bull trout over the short or long-term,then your need to evaluate any sedimentation impacts may be precluded). Go to question 3. All work on this site will occur during low tide cycles and out of any nearby waters. There will be some need for diversion of the Snow Creek stream channel as the railroad trestles and pilings are removed. Work will occur during in-water work windows and low tide cycles of 2013,2014 and 2015. An approved de-watering system,including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals.and any fill removal adjacent to streams or the shoreline. For the work that entails adjacent work to water,areas will be isolated from other waters and dewatered and any remaining fish will be removed. The trestle removals at Salmon Creek and the Maynard project area will involve piling removal. Most of the piles will be pulled in the dry during low tide cycles. However,there are some piles in each trestle that will remain in water even during low tide cycles. These piles will be removed following the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Derelict Creosote Piling Removal Best Management Practices and the Hydraulic Project Approval for Creosote Piling and Structural Removal(see attached).For example at Salmon Creek,due to continually running waters of the creek through the site,a silt curtain will be installed up and downstream of the tiles fish will be removed within the ar•: . d the .ilin Is will be •ulled via vibrato extraction. Following these practices and protocols will decrease the impacts to the streambed and any sediment mobilization that would occur if the areas were dewatered. 3) Does the project activity involve removing structural barriers to fish passage or creating fish passage structures (restoration activities 11 & 13)? YES If yes, apply conservation measure BT2. Document compliance with BT2 in the Notes section below. Go to question 4. NO X Go to question 4. Notes: G-21 • Pap - • 049- • 4) Does the proposed activity have the potential to impact individual bull trout from dewatering, electrofishing,capturing,handling or stranding? YES If yes, describe expected impacts: If yes,the final effect determination is"may affect,likely to adversely affect." If bull trout are impacted by dewatering,electrofishing,capturing,handling or stranding in a way different then described in the above expected impacts,write a memo to the project file documenting the actual impacts and record the information in the annual report for this programmatic consultation. Go to Question 5. NO X Go to question 5. 5) Does the proposed activity have the potential to alter or affect the following Matrix Indicators: sub-population size, growth and survival,life history diversity and isolation, persistence and genetic integrity,temperature, sediment,chemical contamination/nutrients, physical barriers, substrate embeddedness,large woody debris,pool frequency,pool quality,off- channel habitat, refugia, wetted width/depth ratio, streambank condition, floodplain connectivity, peak/base flows, drainage network,road density and location, disturbance history,function of riparian reserves, disturbance regime,or integration of species and habitat conditions? YES X Use Enclosure A to answer this question. If the project results in a"degrade" to the sediment indicator, and there is exposure of bull trout to project activities,you must adequately describe in the Notes Section below: c. the substrate composition present in the project area, d. the best management practices undertaken to reduce disturbance to the substrate and any potential sediment inputs to the aquatic system, e. the suspected magnitude, duration, and distance of any turbidity above background, and f. any monitoring being undertaken to evaluate impacts. Go to question 6. • NO Go to question 6. Notes: See below. 6) Conservation Measures to be applied: Fl BTI BT2 BT3 X None Effect Determination: NLTAA Coastal Puget Sound bull trout DPS G-22 • Provide rationale for effect determination. Individual bull trout are not likely to be impacted by project construction and implementation. All work will occur using equipment staged in upland habitats, and during low tide cycles within the in-water work window guidance for bull trout in marine shoreline areas. Any potential impacts to the Matrix Indicators are likely to be positive impacts. An approved de- watering system,including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals,and any fill removal adjacent to streams or the shoreline. For the work that entails adjacent work to water,areas will be isolated from other waters and dewatered and any remaining fish will be removed. The trestle removals at Salmon Creek and the Maynard project area will involve piling removal. Most of the piles will be pulled in the dry during low tide cycles. However,there are some piles in each trestle that will remain in water even during low tide cycles. These piles will be removed following the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Derelict Creosote Piling Removal Best Management Practices and the Hydraulic Project Approval for Creosote Piling and Structural Removal(see attached).For example at Salmon Creek,due to continually running waters of the creek through the site,a silt curtain will be installed up and downstream of the piles,fish will be removed within the area,and the pilings will be pulled via vibratory extraction. Following these practices and protocols will decrease the impacts to the streambed and any sediment mobilization that would occur if the areas were dewatered. DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT FOR BULL TROUT NOTE: Only address critical habitat for listed species with designated critical habitat. If your project is not in designated critical habitat for bull trout or not in an area of influence for designated critical habitat,you do not need to address the PCE's. When working in marine waters address PCE's 1,6,7,and 8. For freshwater,all PCE's are applicable. 7) Will project work occur in an area of influence or in designated critical habitat for bull trout? YES X If yes, go to question 8. NO If no,explain your answer and go to question 9. 8) Does the proposed activity have the potential to beneficially or negatively alter or impact any of the bull trout critical habitat primary constituent elements (PCEs)? See PBA Chapter 4,Designated Critical Habitat for Bull Trout and Salmon ESUs for full description of PCE's and analysis of impacts from implementation of restoration activities.To understand how the PCEs crosswalk with the Matrix Indicators,refer to Appendix Q. Crosswalk between Matrix of Pathways and Indicators and Bull Trout Critical Habitat Primary Constituent Elements. The PCE's for bull trout were changed from the original Programmatic due to an update published in the Federal Register: The final revised rule designating bull trout critical habitat (75 FR 63898[October 18, 2010])identifies nine Primary Constituent Elements(PCEs) essential for the conservation of the species. G-23 s rr/ O ct'V YES X If yes, indicate on the list below which PCEs may be altered. Describe the cause,size,and expected length of duration of the alteration in the Notes section following each PCE. Remember alterations can be beneficial or negative. NO Go to Question 9. NA PCE 1. Springs, seeps,groundwater sources,and subsurface water connectivity (hyporheic flows)to contribute to water quality and quantity and provide thermal refugia. Notes: Project occurs within nearshore and estuarine habitats. X PCE 2. Migration habitats with minimal physical, biological, or water quality impediments between spawning, rearing, overwintering, and freshwater and marine foraging habitats,including but not limited to permanent,partial,intermittent,or seasonal barriers. Notes: The project will provide beneficial impacts to bull trout and their designated critical habitat by removing nearshore fill,structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine migratory corridor. X PCE 3. An abundant food base,including terrestrial organisms of riparian origin, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and forage fish. Notes: The project will provide beneficial impacts to designated critical habitat for bull trout by removing nearshore fill,structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine migratory corridor,and supporting a more abundant and resilient food web. X PCE 4. Complex river, stream,lake,reservoir, and marine shoreline aquatic environments, and processes that establish and maintain these aquatic environments, with features such as large wood, side channels,pools, undercut banks and unembedded substrates, to provide a variety of depth,gradients,velocities,and structure. Notes: The project will provide beneficial impacts to designated critical habitat for bull trout by removing nearshore fill,structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine migratory corridor,supporting a more abundant and resilient food web, and aiming to restore ecosystem functions and processes at the site. NA PCE 5. Water temperatures ranging from 2 to 15 °C(36 to 59 °F), with adequate thermal refugia available for temperatures that exceed the upper end of this range. Specific temperatures within this range will depend on bull trout life-history stage and form; geography;elevation; diurnal and seasonal variation; shading, such as that provided by riparian habitat; streamflow; and local groundwater influence. Notes: Project occurs within nearshore and estuarine habitats. NA PCE 6. In spawning and rearing areas,substrate of sufficient amount, size, and G-24 composition to ensure success of egg and embryo overwinter survival, fry emergence,and young- of-the-year and juvenile survival. A minimal amount of fine sediment,generally ranging in size from silt to coarse sand,embedded in larger substrates,is characteristic of these conditions.The size and amounts of fine sediment suitable to bull trout will likely vary from system to system. Notes: Project occurs within nearshore and estuarine habitats. NA PCE 7. A natural hydrograph, including peak, high, low, and base flows within historic and seasonal ranges or,if flows are controlled, minimal flow departure from a natural hydrograph. Notes: Project occurs within nearshore and estuarine habitats. X PCE S. Sufficient water quality and quantity such that normal reproduction, growth, and survival are not inhibited. Notes: The project will provide beneficial impacts to designated critical habitat for bull trout by removing nearshore fill, structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine migratory corridor,addressing water quality concerns,supporting a more abundant and resilient food web,and aiming to restore ecosystem functions and processes at the site. NA PCE 9. Sufficiently low levels of occurrence of non-native predatory(e.g.,lake trout, walleye,northern pike, smallmouth bass);interbreeding(e.g.,brook trout); or competing(e.g., brown trout) species that, if present, are adequately temporally and spatially isolated from bull trout. Notes: Project occurs within nearshore and estuarine habitats. NOTE: if a PCE is altered,the effect determination for bull trout critical habitat is a"may affect"determination. If the alteration is negative, the effect determination is a"may affect, likely to adversely affect"determination. If the alteration is positive,the effect determination is a "may affect,not likely to adversely affect" determination. Go to question 9. 9) Effect Determination: NLTAA designated critical habitat for the Coastal Puget Sound bull trout DPS Provide rationale for effect determination. The project will provide beneficial impacts to designated critical habitat for bull trout by removing nearshore fill,structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine migratory corridor,addressing water quality concerns,supporting a more abundant and resilient food web,and aiming to restore ecosystem functions and processes at the site. Go to question 10. 10) Does the project address any of the identified recovery actions in the Draft Recovery Plan for the Coastal-Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout? G-25 1 YES X If so, identify the action and location here. : 1.6:Identify impaired estuarine and nearshore habitats and implement actions to restore their appropriate function. NO Go to Question 11. 11) If the above effect determination for bull trout is a"likely to adversely affect" determination for bull trout and bull trout critical habitat,a pre-project incidental take estimate will need to be thoroughly described here. Link incidental take estimates to a restoration activity occurring at the project site,do not double count incidental take. For example,the project involves riparian planting and instream structure work. All work will occur at the same time. Both the riparian planting and instream structure work will contribute sediment to the stream channel. In this case,you would only count the immediate instream project area and downstream sediment dispersal area once and associate it with the most egregious activity, RA 1 Install instream structures. Bull Trout Incidental Take X There is no incidental take associated with these restoration activities. Impacts to Bull Trout Critical Habitat There are no impacts to bull trout critical habitat associated with this project. X There are positive impacts to bull trout critical habitat associated with this project. There are negative impacts to bull trout critical habitat associated with this project. Impacts to bull trout critical habitat associated with restoration activities 4. 8. 10 is the following: Impacts to bull trout critical habitat is occurring in the following: bull trout management unit: Olympic Peninsula Management Unit bull trout FMO habitat outside of core area: Strait of Juan de Fuca,Marine Nearshore Riparian area planted: 3.4 acres Intertidal acreage directly impacted: 37 acres Description of impacts to critical habitat(positive or negative): The project will provide beneficial impacts to designated critical habitat for bull trout by removing nearshore fill,structure and contaminants,thereby improving the health and resilience of the marine 0-26 "." k.......,_.m.,_....6 migratory corridor,addressing water quality concerns,supporting a more abundant and resilient food web,and aiming to restore ecosystem functions and processes at the site. CONCURRENCE: tiro.,fly‘A. , _.-- • 9,, ,111/6t/. l ?3/00? Project of 'st Date /' i V_A i/ 3 ,f./ / - - , Manager,Division of Environmental Assessment-and Restoration Date AI 0 __31 9 mikae--- Aitctssc,ni vf Mana er Di ision of onsultation&Technical Assistance Date g 5 WaCC-1-,CSC'vrtj , NOAA Fisheries Date G-27 ' ;., `71LZIiij Ins ml cu .0 a 5 to .4 0 8 U o E 4 o a 0 U w 8 a, 0 o .5 0 0 eu . 43 z o 0 y c5 0. 0 o - � Z ZZ zzzz z z z 0 It 4 0 t 6 ib A er0i 'o .Q o ) 0 0 a E• to .o v, 4 • o 5 � x as a a 14 v . va h u) o to a a A y �, E o ,> a.•a 8 5 U 0 Z a :c U ' ~ ai x o U . 4 W iiii aiJ } fthHhJIhIj Ilk p w 0 0 U O C •� 1 N 11 44-Gad - Cd 0 � CO - O c c G. tit •5+ s o• .§ at -a a *a .0 .a co :3 cC 4) b > a al � ,0 �as a a a a a • , a)• o � oE4) loo iz o -4 w ArG ^d ?I'D 0 3. _ h g . g .. b �' o n6 8 04 8 .c.:20 'rs a II g I-3 4., I ., � "�' 14 .4 �x II 8 bb 1. II Fop g:`' .S LA wa6ca � C76 : way' 4 ES r2'4 Z P#EAT "itig .r9D,#1fr ENCLOSURE D. TABLE 4.4.Coastal Puget Sound and Columbia River Bull Trout DPS's Core Areas, local populations and FMO areas within the area covered by the PBA. Management or FMO Area Core Area Local Population Area Recovery Unit Olympic Skokomish River,including Peninsula North and South Forks from the mouth up to the National Forest or National Park boundaries Hood Canal and independent tributaries up to the National Forest boundary Dungeness River up to the Middle Dungeness National Forest boundary River and tributaries Strait of Juan de Fuca and independent tributaries up to the National Park boundary Elwha River up to the Little River(potential National Forest or National local population) Park boundary Pacific Ocean and independent coastal tributaries(areas of National Park are not included) Hoh River up to the National South Fork Hoh River Forest or National Park and tributaries boundaries Queets River up to the National Park boundary Quinault River up to the National Forest or National Park boundary Lower Chehalis River/Grays Harbor and independent tributaries G-30 • -� Management or FMO Area Core Area Local Population Recovery Unit Puget Sound Chilliwack River up to the National Forest boundary Nooksack River up to the Glacier Creek National Forest boundary Lower Canyon Creek Lower North Fork Nooksack Lower Middle Fork Nooksack River Lower South Fork Nooksack River Middle North Fork Nooksack River Upper Middle Fork Nooksack River Samish River Lower Skagit River up to the Illabot Creek National Forest or National Park boundary Stillaguamish River up to the Canyon Creek National Forest boundary North Fork Stillaguamish River Upper Deer Creek Snohomish/Skykomish Rivers South Fork Skykomish up to the National Forest River boundary Lake Washington including the following: Lower Cedar River: Sammamish River, Lakes Washington, Sammamish and Union; and Ship Canal Lower Green River Puyallup River up to the Carbon River National Forest or National Clearwater River Park boundary Greenwater River Upper Puyallup and Mowich Rivers Upper White River West Fork White River Lower Nisqually River Marine Areas of Puget Sound G-31 • Management or FMO Area Core Area Local Population '1'Recovery Unit Lower Columbia Lewis River up to the Cougar Creek River Basin National Forest boundary Pine Creek Klickitat River up to the West Fork Klickitat National Forest bound River Middle Columbia Mainstem Columbia River Yakima River up to the Mainstem Yakima River River Basin National Forest or National (Keechelus to Easton Park boundary Reach) Ahtanum Creek(North, South and Middle Forks) Naches River tributaries (American River, Rattlesnake Creek and Crow Creek) North Fork Teanaway River Kachess Lake tributaries (Box Canyon Creek and the upper Kachess River) U• er CleElum River Upper Columbia Mainstem Columbia River Wenatchee River up to the Nason Creek(including River Basin National Forest boundary Mill Creek) Chiwaukum Creek Chewawa River (including Chikamin, Phelps,Rock,Alpine, Buck and James Creeks) White River(including Canyon and Panther Creeks) Peshastin Creek (including Ingalls Creek) Entiat River up to the Mainstem Entiat River G-32 F . I .}tea National Forest boundary Mad River Methow River up to the Gold Creek National Forest boundary Twisp River Chewuch River Wolf Creek Northeast Pend Oreille River up to the Le Clerc Creek Washin_ on National Forest bound. Umatilla-Walla Walla Walla River up to the Mill Creek and Walla River National Forest boundary tributaries Basin Touchet River and tributaries Snake River Mainstem Snake River Asotin Creek up to the North fork Asotin Creek Basin National Forest boundary including Cougar Creek Tucannon River up to the Upper Tucannon River National Forest boundary (river kilometer 78 to 93)and tributaries (Bear,Sheep,Cold, Panjab,Meadow,Little Turkey and Turkey Creeks Grande Ronde Grande Ronde River Wenatchee Creek River Basin G-33 • S Q • S:beclion7tntenaintemd.wpd ''C �. .•, Appendix B INTRA-SERVICE SECTION 7 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FORM FWS Reference: [Note: This form provides an outline of information needed for intra-Service consultation. Please attach additional sheets or expand sections to accommodate your responses.] Originating Person:_Ginger Phalen Telephone Number: 360-753-5819 Date: 12/31/12 I. Region: 1 II. Service Activity(Program): Puget Sound Coastal Program and National Coastal Wetland Conservation Grants Program III. A. Listed species and/or their designated critical habitat within the action area: Boccacio(Sebastes paucispinus)Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Canary Rockfish (Sebastes pinniger)Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus)Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Killer Whale(Orcinus orca)Southern Resident DPS and Designated Critical Habitat Bull Trout(Salvelinus confluentus)Coastal Puget Sound DPS and Designated Critical Habitat Marbled murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) B. Proposed species and/or proposed critical habitat within the action area: NONE C. Candidate species within the action area: NONE IV. Geographic area or station name and action: USFWS Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Puget Sound Coastal Program and National Coastal Wetland Conservation Grant Program: Discovery Bay Railroad Grade Removal,Beach and Estuary Restoration V. Location (attach map): 1 A. County and State: Jefferson, WA. Watershed/WRIA: WRIA 17 Hood Canal,Discovery Bay HUC#and River/Stream Name: Snow and Salmon Creek River Mile: estuary Tributary to: Discovery Bay Estuary adjacent to Puget Sound B. Section,township, and range(or latitude and longitude): T29N RO2W S24 NW C. Distance(miles) and direction to nearest town: In between Sequim and Ouilcene along State Route(SR) 101.near the junction with SR 20. D. Include species/habitat occurrence on a map,if possible. VI. Description of proposed action(attach additional pages as needed): For the restoration actions associated with this project, please refer to the PBACF Project Description pages G3—G13. For the description of the waterline relocation, and construction of the Olympic Discovery Trail segment,please see below. Waterline Relocation, The private waterline currently transits through the restoration project area,buried in the railroad grade which will be removed as part of the restoration actions. The waterline serves 20 residences. The waterline will be relocated outside of the restoration project area, and will be buried within the to-be constructed segment of the Olympic Discovery Trail, adjacent to SR101. The Peninsula Trail Coalition for the Olympic Discovery Trail, a regional trail system, had hoped to use the railroad grade through the project area as a trail bed,however,because this alignment did not allow for robust restoration within the project area,a new alignment has been assigned along SR 101. Due to equal interests in the trail and in the restoration, the trail will be constructed in concert with the construction of the restoration project, as funding allows. The trail and waterline alignment is now west of the restoration project area, and occurs on a Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)highway fill slope. This alignment was selected due to its reduced impact to any wetland habitats. Most of the area of impact on the slope is covered in grassy vegetation with an occasional fir, alder or willow tree. Downslope and waterward of the area of impact there is a conifer and deciduous marine riparian corridor established on what appears to be an old road grade. The waterline and trail properties are on WSDOT SR101 Right-of-Way, or Jefferson County Right-of-Way. The waterline will be relocated in the SR 101 Right-of-Way, within the structure of the trail, described below. It will be installed in a ditch dug by excavating equipment, either 2 a backhoe or a ditch digger. Project proponents are currently negotiating with the WSDOT to be able to hang the waterline along the SR101 bridge crossings of Salmon and Snow Creeks. If WSDOT does not agree, the waterline will cross Salmon Creek on a pedestrian trail bridge that will be constructed to carry the waterline and also serve as a future connection for the Olympic Discovery Trail. The waterline will cross Snow Creek on a structure that will suspend the line over the creek. These creek crossing structures will have concrete abutments within the 100 year floodplain, and will span the wetted channel, so no support pilings will be driven in the wetted channel of these streams. The proposed alignment for the waterline begins near the water source near East Uncas Road on the west side of SR 101,crosses SR 101 to the east and turns north and follows the highway to the south side of Salmon Creek,crosses SR 101 to the west, and turns north and follows the highway to West Uncas Road. The waterline reduces here from an 8-inch-pipe to a 6-inch-pipe, turns west and follows an abandoned railroad grade to a connection with the existing water system for a distance of 2, 735 feet. An additional crossing of SR 101 occurs at West Uncas Road. In the Maynard project area, the 6-inch-pipe begins at an access road north of the Rail Road Car Restaurant, follows the west side of SR 101 to Old Gardiner Road. It follows Old Gardiner Road to Cemetery Road,then turns north across Old Gardiner Road and continues north along Cemetery Road,terminating at a connection point for the existing water system on the north side of Cemetery Road for a distance of 2,600 feet. There is a SR 101 crossing that occurs near the Snug Harbor Café. Installation of the waterline is currently projected to occur in fall of 2013,and will take approximately 4 weeks to install, so 20 working days. Work will be completed in degraded upland habitats, and adjacent to a busy highway, there will not be any sound disturbance impacts associated with this action. Trail Construction The trail is located as far from MHHW as is feasible,while accommodating distance requirements from the highway. The trail is designed to have minimal impact to any adjacent marine riparian vegetation. The trail project will require the construction of a rock wall,reinforced slopes and/or a soldier pile wall. These elements are included in the design to minimize impacts to the adjacent shoreline riparian vegetation by minimizing trail prism width. The trail will be constructed on the highway embankment by cut and fill. A completed feasibility study indicates that it will be possible to construct the trail in this location. The trail will be a shared-path configuration with a paved surface for non-motorized vehicles and will be constructed within the SR101 Right-of-Way. The path will be a minimum width of 10-feet with 2-foot gravel shoulders on each side. An additional width totaling 4 feet is targeted to provide for potential drainage needs and to provide for a conservation design that could be scaled back if necessary. 3 • Shared paths must maintain adequate separation from highways, and the shoreline impacts from the trail need to be reduced also. The feasibility study indicates that it is possible to place the trail at the standard minimum distance from the highway and have minimal physical impact to the shoreline,with the use of walls and steep side slopes. The northern segment of the trail will be adjacent to an existing guardrail, the southern segment will require construction of a new guardrail. The trail design calls for embankment construction with all fill materials, as cutting into embankment is not desirable. Typical 2 tol side slopes would be used on the existing yp p the new trail embankment,which results in significant borrow material needs. It may be necessary to make some adjustments to this design, to minimize the borrow needs. This could include further evaluation of the possibility of cutting into the existing embankment, and/or increasing the trail embankment steepness, and using a mechanically stabilized earth embankment. The vertical profile of the trail will match the highway grade, and be about 5% grade, meeting requirements,and minimizing the need for any landings or other special considerations. To accommodate for appropriate drainage, the trail will be sloped towards the downhill side to allow for water runoff and dispersal over the side slope embankment. Currently, surface runoff from the highway runs off the shoulder and down the embankment. The trail will interrupt this downhill runoff and could cause adverse impacts such as erosion to the bay or unacceptable amounts of water on the trail surface. A ditch or swale between the embankment and the trail will be constructed to alleviate these potential impacts. Some additional study may be needed to ensure proper discharge of storm water. To reduce environmental impacts, and retain existing estuarine riparian vegetation, retaining walls will need to be constructed along the trail embankment in various locations. Along the southern segment of the trail, the available area is limited, so walls will be needed to avoid impacts to the shoreline. These walls could be as high as 8 feet and the base of the walls would be very near high tide. Along the northern segment of the trail, some trees will be preserved, and walls will need to be constructed in those locations. These walls may need to be 12 feet or more to assist with tree preservation. The draft geotechnical report has confirmed all early assumptions. The will need to be further work to evaluate high walls and the use of reinforced side slopes. All trail construction work will be completed using heavy equipment, and will occur adjacent to a busy state highway, so there will be no increase in background noise levels. Funding for the trail construction is currently being pursued. If funding is available, the trail construction will occur in concert with the waterline relocation in Fall 2013. If funding is not available, the project will be delayed until Summer 2014. Construction of the trail is expected to take 6 weeks for approximately 30 working days. VII. Determination of effects: 4 PaV A. Explanation of effects of the action on species and critical habitats in items III. A, B, and C (attach additional pages as needed): SPECIES DESCRIPTION Puget Sound Georgia Basin Boccacio Puget sound boccacio(Sebastes paucispinis) were listed as endangered by the National Marine Fisheries Service in April 2010. Boccacio are large,piscivorous rockfish that range from northern Baja California to Alaska,with two populations that are thought to be partially separate, northern Washington and British Columbia, and a southern population off of California(NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). In Puget Sound,most boccacio are found in southern Puget Sound, south of the Tacoma Narrows(NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Boccacio can be up to 3 feet in length, have a large elongated jaw,extending beyond the eye socket, and have a color range on their backs of golden olive to brown or burnt orange, with pink or red stomachs. As adults,they prefer rocky habitat from 130—820 feet deep,or deeper. Juveniles are pelagic and associated with surface waters and become more demersal and associated with bottom habitat as their age progresses. Typical life spans for boccacio range from 45-50 years (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Juveniles can be associated with kelp canopies and drifting kelp mats, shallow, algae covered rocky areas and sand and eelgrass habitats. Sexual maturity typically occurs between 4-5 years of age. Mating occurs in the fall with larval releases in January to April, the larvae are pelagic for 3.5-5 months, and then associated with deeper rocky bottom habitats as they mature(NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Larval boccacio are planktivores, while adults are piscivorous and prefer to eat other rockfish,but will also eat anchovies, sablefish, lanternfish and squid. Threats to the species include overfishing,bycatch,habitat degradation, water quality and low dissolved oxygen, elevated environmental contaminants present in marine waters, and adverse environmental conditions in the 1990's which led to recruitment failures (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Puget Sound Georgia Basin Canary Rockfish Puget Sound Georgia Basin canary(Sebastes pinniger) rockfish were listed as threatened by the National Marine Fisheries Service in April 2010. Canary rockfish range from Baja California to western Alaska. Within this range, canary rockfish are most common off the coast of Oregon. Canary rockfish are large rockfish, and can reach up to 2.5 feet in length and up to 10 lbs. (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website,2012). Adults range in color from bright yellow to orange, with gray background, smaller fish have dark markings on the posterior part of the spiny dorsal fin, and gray along the lateral line. As adults,canary rockfish occur in waters 160—820 feet in depth (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). They exhibit strong site fidelity and are typically associated with rocky bottoms, outcrops and reefs,kelp canopies or artificial structures, where they occur in loose groups just off the bottom(NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Larval fish are pelagic and occur in surface waters where they can stay 5 c , .........4_,_ for several months, subject to tidal currents. The larvae settle to tide pools,rocky reefs, kelp beds and low rock and cobble areas, and juveniles use the rock/sand interface in 45-60 feet depth during the day(Drake et. al.,2010). Juvenile canary rockfish associate with the same habitat types but often occur in shallower water, and can remain there for up to 3 years. As canary rockfish mature,they migrate to deeper water habitat. Larval canary rockfish are planktivores,juveniles focus on copepods and euphausiids, and adults eat demersal invertebrates, small rockfish and other small fish that occur within their preferred habitat types(Drake et. al., 2010). Threat to the species include overfishing, loss of nearshore habitat, water quality issues including low dissolved oxygen, and increased chemical and nutrient contaminant loads (Drake et. al., 2010). Puget Sound Georgia Basin Yelloweye Rockfish Puget Sound Georgia Basin yelloweye rockfish(Sebastes ruberrimus)were listed as threatened by the National Marine Fisheries Service in April 2010. Yelloweye rockfish range from northern Baja California to the Gulf of Alaska, and within that range, are more common in central California up to the gulf of Alaska(NFWS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Yelloweye rockfish are noted as rare in Puget Sound(NMFS 2012). Yelloeye rockfish are large fish, reaching up to 3 feet in length and 39 lbs. They are one of the longest lived rockfish species,with a life span that can reach up to 118 years (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website;2012). Yelloweye rockfish are orange-yellow to orange-red in coloration, have yellow eyes,may have black on their fin tips, and adults have a light to white stripe on the lateral line. As adults,they occur in deep water habitats from 80-1,560 feet deep, often associated with rocky bottoms, and outcrops, and are generally solitary(Drake et. al., 2010). Larval yelloweye rockfish are planktivores,juveniles focus on copepods and euphasiids, and adults prey on demersal invertebrates, smaller rockfish and other fish species that occur in their preferred habitats (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 20120). Juveniles and sub-adults occur in shallower water, and are associated with kelp canopies, rocky bottoms, and outcrops or artificial structures (NMFS Office of Protected Species Website, 2012). Yelloweye rockfish larvae are present pelagically for up to 2 months in early spring to late summer with inshore and offshore movement according to winds and tides. Juvenile yelloweye rockfish have not been reported from intertidal and nearshore habitats in Puget Sound (NMFS 2012). Threats to the species include overfishing, loss of nearshore habitat, water quality issues including low dissolved oxygen, and increased chemical and nutrient contaminant loads (Drake et. al., 2010). Southern Resident Killer Whale DPS and Designated Critical Habitat The southern resident killer whale(Orcinus orca)distinct population segment was listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service as endangered in November 2005. Critical habitat for the southern resident killer whale was designated in 2006 (NMFS 2008). Critical habitat includes all waters starting at 20 foot depth(relative to extreme high water). Critical habitat was defined as having the following physical and biological features essential to the conservation of the species: 1) water quality to support growth and development; 2)prey species of sufficient quantity, quality and availability to support 6 Yv individual growth,reproduction anf d development,as well as overall population growth; and 3)passage conditions to allow for migration, resting, and foraging (NMFS 2008). Coastal areas are not designated as critical habitat(NMFS 2008). Orca whales are the worlds' largest dolphin, with males typically larger than females, with length that ranges from 21 to 27 feet long, and 8,000— 12,000 lbs. (NMFS 2008). Orcas have a distinctive black and white coloration. White patches are oval shaped and above their eyes,there are distinct marking on their saddles, which allow for individual identification and tracking, and white coloration on their bellies. Orca whales have worldwide distribution,but mostly occur in coastal waters at high latitudes. In the Northeastern Pacific Ocean, three distinct communities of orcas are recognized, residents, transients, and an offshore community. The communities have different body morphology, vocalization patterns, and prey bases (NMFS 2008). The southern resident community has 3 pods, the J, K, and L pods (NMFS 2008). These orcas are present in the waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Strait of Georgia, and Puget Sound during the late spring summer and fall. Winter and early spring migrations are not well known (NMFS 2008). They are known to travel as far south as central California,and as far north as the Queen Charlotte Islands in British Columbia, overlapping geographically with a northern resident community. There has not been any observation of intermixing between the populations(NMFS 2008). Threats to the species include: 1)reductions in prey quantity and quality; 2)high levels of organochlorine contaminants and increasing levels of many emerging contaminants; 3) sound and disturbance from vessel traffic; and 4)oil spills (NMFS 2008). Please see the PBACF and associated documents for Species Descriptions for marbled murrelet and bull trout. Explanation of Effects of the Action: The project location is in North Puget Sound and the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca in nearshore habitat within the boundaries of the Wildlife Management Area owned and maintained by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and adjacent lands owned by the Jefferson Land Trust and the Washington State Department of Transportation. Restoration projects actions will occur in nearshore estuary,saltmarsh and adjacent freshwater stream habitats. Restoration project actions at this site include: • Removal of 1,465 feet of railroad grade and the embedded private waterline around and between Salmon and Snow creeks,including 3 creosote-laden railroad trestles.This will restore 16 acres of salt marsh and estuary. The railroad grade currently functions as a dike/berm which bisects the estuary, constricts the steam mouths and disrupts ecosystem processes. • In the Snow Creek estuary, side cast dredge spoils and the delta cone will be removed and tidal channels will be constructed, restoring 9.9 acres of salt marsh and estuary. • In the"Maynard" area of the project, (northeast of the Snow and Salmon creek estuaries) 1,250 of shoreline armoring, 11,160 cubic yards of nearshore fill, and one railroad trestle will be removed, along the 1,760 feet of the abandoned railroad grade that had been 7 , ,_ . , - _�_�fj1'r- , � _-•-cam constructed on former tideflats. This action will restore a shoreline with 2 acres of restored beach faces; 2 acres of spits; a 1 acre pocket estuary;4.8 acres of estuarine intertidal habitat; and 3 creek mouth junctions with Discovery Bay. • Planting of 3.4 acres of marine riparian area with native trees and shrubs, will support low and high salt marsh establishment in the footprints of removed railroad grade and the Snow Creek side cast spoils/delta cone removal area. Most of the restoration activities at this project site are fill removal actions. Some restoration project elements will require backfilling. When the defunct tidegate is removed,the resulting hole in the area will be filled with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent railroad grade. In places where the beach surface has become armored with cobble or concrete spilling from the railroad grade, this material • will be over-excavated and replaced with clean beach sands and gravels excavated from the adjacent railroad grade. Other associated actions embedded in the above include: Removal of a standpipe and defunct culvert and tidegate currently in the railroad grade between the mill pond and the lagoon; removal of a barn and 2 outbuildings, all currently in a high level of decay, and removal of a septic system on lands now owned by Jefferson Land Trust in the southern portion of the project area,adjacent to Snow Creek. More specific information on the _ restoration actions is provided in the attached PBACF,pages 03-G13. For the waterline relocation and the trail development portion of the project,the trail and waterline alignment is west of the restoration project area and occurs on an adjacent Washington state highway fill slope. This alignment moves an existing waterline out of the project area, and routes the Olympic Discovery Trail around the restoration project area, to an area of lesser impact and habitat value. The habitat conditions along the waterline/trail alignment are poor. This is a highway right of way and has been maintained as such. It offers little habitat value, with limited potential for an increase in this value. Most of the area of impact on the slope is currently covered in grassy vegetation with an occasional fir, alder or willow tree. Downslope and waterward of the area of impact there is a conifer and deciduous marine riparian corridor established on what appears to be an old road grade. All waterline relocation and trail construction work will be completed using heavy equipment. Work will be completed in upland habitats in dry conditions, and adjacent to a busy highway. When water crossings are involved, work will occur in the dry during low tide cycles,or if necessary in-water work areas will be dewatered and isolated as necessary according to accepted protocol. Due to this location and habitat status,there will not be any sound disturbance and any habitat impacts will be insignificant and discountable. B. Explanation of actions to be implemented to avoid, minimize,or reduce adverse effects: 8 4 f, 1T'.z-.-: To avoid,minimize,and reduce any adverse effects,in addition to the best management practices and conservation measures documented in the attached PBACF, the following best management practices will be implemented: Site Specific Best Management Practices: 1. Excavation areas are typically adjacent to tide waters of Discovery Bay. Excavation will not occur in water. Where tidal influence is present,excavation work will be completed only when the site is not inundated by tide waters.The contractor will use caution mobilizing and demobilizing. Shoreline grading, bulkhead removal, and railroad grade removal will occur from the railroad grade so that machinery will not need to travel below Ordinary High Water(OHW). Silt fences and other erosion control measures will be installed around all activities that involve dredge, fill, stockpiling or structural removal. 2. All work will conform to local, state and federal agency requirements. 3. The approved in-water work window will be adhered to as required by the Hydraulic Permit Approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 4. The contractor will verify that the existing waterline has been decommissioned prior to any grading or clearing. 5. The contractor will verify all clearing limits with the project engineer prior to any vegetation removal. 6. A de-watering system,including stream diversion will be in place for trestle removals, and any fill removal adjacent to streams. 7. Creosote trestle bridges will be removed following Best Management Practices and Specifications developed by the Washington State DNR on similar creosote removal projects. S. NOSC will have a project manager on site during construction activities. 9. Access and phasing is very important to performing work at appropriate tidal stages. NOSC will require that the contractor submit a detailed project schedule that will require them to think through all of the steps and how they will be executed with consideration given to the tidal cycle. 10. Prior to restoration actions below the MHHW along the marine shorelines,the harvestable shellfish resource in the project footprint will be harvested by local tribes. These resources will be reseeded post project by WDFW. Olympia oysters in the project footprint will be temporarily relocated during project construction. To date, forage fish spawning surveys conducted at the site have not detected surf smelt or sand lance spawn. There are no anticipated adverse impacts to any waterbodies on the site,wetland or stream. The goal of the restoration project and the waterline and trail construction actions are to return nearshore processes and functions to as close to historic as possible and enhance and increase resilience of the site where conditions cannot be recreated. 9 The project area is in the nearshore estuarine area of Discovery Bay and estuarine areas of Salmon and Snow Creeks. The project area is currently in a degraded condition, impacted by nearshore fill, railroad grades and trestles,and other infrastructure. Puget Sound boccacio, canary and yelloweye rockfish: Within the project vicinity, there is no documented current use by boccacio,canary rockfish or yelloweye rockfish adults. For these species,larval life stages will largely be transitioned to juvenile life stages prior to construction. Juvenile boccacio,canary and yelloweye rockfish are all know to migrate offshore to deeper water habitats as they mature, and will not likely be in the shallow nearshore habitat where project restoration work will occur. Implementation of the project will use heavy equipment and will be ultimately beneficial to nearshore habitats with the objective of restoring nearshore ecological processes and functions. While there may be benefits to the nearshore ecosystem and marine food chain via estuary and saltmarsh habitat restoration, improvements will occur at a very local scale, in an area where boccacio,canary and yelloweye rockfish are not likely to be foraging. There will be no impacts to larval, juvenile or adult boccacio,canary or yelloweye rockfish from project construction,as they are not likely to within the project vicinity. There is not any critical habitat currently proposed or designated for Puget Sound Georgia basin boccacio,canary,or yelloweye rockfish. Southern Resident Killer Whales: Within the project boundary and vicinity there is currently no documented use by southern resident orcas. Within the project boundary there is not designated critical habitat, due to the shallow water depth of the area. However, in the project vicinity there is adjacent designated critical habitat, and orcas are documented to occur in Discovery Bay north of the project area, with 1-5 sitings documented (NMFS 2008). Given the timing of project construction in summer to fall, orcas may be transiting through the adjacent Strait of Juan de Fuca and may come into Discovery Bay. However, orcas have been noted to spend the majority of their time in deeper water, with only occasional entry into water less than 15 feet deep (NMFS 2008). Entry into shallow water seems to be related to either pursuit of prey, or injury or impairment. Orca distribution is also noted to associate with areas of greater prey availability,with a focus on salmonids (NMFS 2008). Salmonid species do currently use the project area, and restoration of this habitat may encourage increased future use by salmonids,or other prey species. Implementation of the project will be ultimately beneficial to nearshore habitats with the objective of restoring nearshore ecological processes and functions. The project will occur adjacent to a busy state highway, so any noise production from heavy equipment will not be above background.levels. Any noise associated with vibratory extraction of the trestle piles, will be of very short duration, and implemented following protocols to reduce in-water noise levels. There will be a localized benefit to the nearshore ecosystem and marine food chain via estuary and saltmarsh habitat restoration, a. 4, - ,.. 4_ which will improve habitat support and functions for salmonids and other nearshore dependent species. Project work will occur in an area where orcas are not likely to be foraging. There will be no impacts to orcas from project construction, as they are not likely to be within the project vicinity. Murrelet Please see the attached PBACF for the information on restoration actions and potential impacts to marbled murrelets. For the waterline relocation and trail construction component of this project, all work will occur within the SR101 Right-of-Way or Jefferson County Right-of-Way, in habitats that are already in a degraded condition. There is not any suitable or designated critical habitat for murrelet within the project area or vicinity. The construction activities associated with waterline relocation and Olympic Discovery Trail construction will not generate noise above ambient levels, as work will occur directly adjacent to the busy, noisy SR101 corridor. No aircraft will be used,and no suitable habitat trees will be removed. It is not expected that there will be negative impacts to marbled murrelets from waterline and trail project construction. The restoration component of the project will create a localized benefit to the nearshore ecosystem and marine food chain, via estuary and saltmarsh habitat restoration,which will improve habitat support and functions for nearshore dependent species, some of which murrelets may use as prey. Bull trout Please see the.attached PBACF for the information on restoration actions and potential impacts to Coastal Puget Sound bull trout. For the waterline relocation and trail construction component of the project, all work will occur within the SR101 Right-of-Way or Jefferson County Right-of-Way, in habitats that are already in a degraded conditions. This alignment moves an existing waterline out of the project area, and routes the Olympic Discovery Trail around the restoration project area, to an area of lesser impact and habitat value. There is not any suitable or designated critical habitat for bull trout within the project area,but critical habitat is adjacent, in the nearshore areas of Discovery Bay. The trail is located as far from MHI-JW as is feasible, while accommodating distance requirements from the highway. The trail is designed to have minimal impact to any adjacent marine riparian vegetation. The trail project will require the construction of a rock wall, reinforced slopes and/or a soldier pile wall. These elements are included in the design to minimize impacts to the adjacent shoreline riparian vegetation by minimizing trail prism width. The habitat conditions along the waterline/trail alignment are poor. This is a highway right of way and has been maintained as such. It offers little habitat value,with limited potential for an increase in this value. Most of the area of impact on the slope is currently covered in grassy vegetation with an occasional fir, alder or willow tree. Downslope and waterward of the area of impact there is a conifer and deciduous marine 11 riparian corridor established on what appears to be an old road grade. All waterline relocation and trail construction work will be completed using heavy equipment. Work will be completed in upland habitats in dry conditions, and adjacent to a busy highway. When water crossings are involved,work will occur in the dry during low tide cycles, or if necessary in-water work areas will be dewatered and isolated as necessary according to accepted protocol. All efforts will be made to retain any native marine riparian vegetation. Due to this location, habitat status, and the implementation of best management practices, it is not expected that there will be any negative impacts to bull trout from this waterline relocation and trail construction action. There will be a localized benefit to the nearshore ecosystem and marine food chain via estuary and saltmarsh habitat restoration,which will improve habitat support and functions for bull trout, salmonids and other nearshore dependent species. VIII. Effect determinations) and response(s)requested: [*optional] A. Listed species/designated critical habitat: Determination Response requested NO EFFECT Species: Puget Sound Georgia Basin Boccacio DPS Puget Sound Georgia Basin Canary Rockfish DPS Puget Sound Yelloweye Rockfish DPS k Concurrence IS NOT LIKELY TO ADVERSELY AFFECT Species: Southern Resident Killer Whale DPS Coastal Puget Sound Bull Trout DPS Marbled Murrelet Concurrence Critical Habitat: Designated Critical Habitat for Southern Resident Killer Whale DPS Designated Critical Habitat for Coastal Puget Sound Bull Trout DPS Concurrence 12 — IX. Signatures rJ, "' \ii,. 5 ..i?„4.4, Date (#;)613 Project Biologist (____...ZLV":; ate' Date 8/ Initiating Officer v' Concur Do Not Concur Comments: Osi W D VA, r Consultation and T finical Assistant Supervisor Concur Do Not Concur Comments: 13 References Drake J.S.,E.A. Bemtson,J.M. Cope, R.G.Gustafson,E.E. Holmes, P.S.Levin, N. Tolimieri, R.S. Waples, S.M. Sogard, and G.D. Williams. 2010.. Status review of five rockfish species in Puget Sound,Washington:boccacio(Sebastes paucispinis), canary rockfish (S. pinniger),yelloweye rockfish (S. ruberrimus),Greenstriped rockfish (S. elongatus)and redstripe rockfish (S.proriger). U.S. Dept. of Commer.,NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-108, 234p. EPA website 2005, accessed December 2012). National Marine Fisheries Service. 2008. Recovery Plan for Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca). National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Region, Seattle Washington. NMFS. 2012. Endangered Species Act Section 7 Formal Consultation, and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for the Port Townsend Ferry Terminal Slip 1 Transfer Span Project, Port Townsend,WA(NWS 2010-37) (Sixth Field HUC 171100190802 Marrowstone Island-Frontal Port Townsend) Jefferson County,WA. February 27, 2012. Accesses via NMFS Public Consultation Tracking System. 66'pp. NMFS Office of Protected Species Website 2012, (accessed December 31, 2012). 14 LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN JEFFERSON COUNTY AS PREPARED BY I THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised March 15, 2012) LISTED Bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus) Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) - -�-a - - - - - _ _ • - • ;A , IUD lr,c��l-ce- cor O t n �c+ � < < • —stied-tat • . •_ - ''! - +;- - :. r :- = - - - k -k - "(b(" h t b4- s -Fay le� ,,, Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to sh L listed animal species include: .Draja4 J+ctntk 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species, and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. DESIGNATED Critical habitat for bull trout A/y�1,rwkq 6,bkGs of rn4.6ti) moevticES Dr PS Viunit..3 PROPOSED Dolly Varden (Salvelinus mama) due to similarity of appearance CANDIDATE hF. Wh SPECIES OF CONCERN °I W, . A fv�.c ' Aleutian Canada goose (Brenta canadensis leucopareia) V ketr`I Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocepha/us) Brown pelican (Pelecanus occidental's) [outer coast] Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) Cassin's auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus) Coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) [southwest Washington DPS] Destruction Island shrew (Sorex trowbridgii destructioni) Long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) Long-legged myotis (Myotis volans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) = Z' Olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooped) Olympic torrent salamander (Rhyacotriton olympicus) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Pacific Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresi) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) Tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) Valley silverspot (Speyeria zerene bremeri) Van Dyke's salamander(Plethodon vandykei) . Western toad (Bufo boreas) • NMFS LISTED,PROPOSED,ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT WITHIN THE PROJECT VICINITY OF THE SNOW SNF DSLMON CREEKS AND DISCOVERY BAY ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT DECEMBER 2012 ' LISTED Chinook Salmon(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Puget Sound ESU Chum Salmon(Oncorhynchus keta), Hood Canal ESU Steelhead Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound ESU Boccacio(Sebastes paucispinis) Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Canary Rockfish(Sebastes pinniger) Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus) Puget Sound Georgia Basin DPS Killer Whale, (Orcinus orca)Southern Resident DPS DESIGNATED Critical habitat for Puget Sound Chinook salmon ESU Critical habitat for Hood Canal summer chum salmon ESU Critical habitat for killer whale,southern resident DPS i . 9 CC 4' .t Self-certification of Proposed Habitat Restoration Activity Consistency with the Habitat Restoration Program,4(d)Rule,Limit 8 In order for a proposed habitat restoration activity to be consistent with the Habitat Restoration Program(HRP),the project proponent needs to review the elements of the HRP and certify,using the checklist below. The HRP includes habitat protection and restoration projects funded by the SRFB that meet the following characteristics: ,-Are part of a habitat portion of a salmon recovery plan approved by a Regional Salmon Recovery Organization and the State of Washington and ...published in the Federal Register by NMES;and Are part of an adopted Implementation Schedule developed by a Regional Organization to implement the habitat portion of a Salmon Recovery Plan; and Are funded in part or wholly with Washington State and/or Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund(PCSRF)monies managed by the SRFB and are ,consistent with the technical and procedural criteria outlined by SRFB;an .4 re being done for the purpose of habitat restoration;an , Are projects that fit within a specific list of eligible actions: In-Stream Diversion Screening c etream Riparian Habitat Restoration Upland Habitat Restoration or Protection • uaCLne and Marine Nearshore Habitat Restoration i ,{fjrth O/ye piL �.1.t- CC7rall'tiv� Kee. n. «C- eY 1!/d-31/ I 01--- /s/ Project Proponent Date Habitat Management Plan Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project June 2013 Prepared for Jefferson County Department of Community Development By the North Olympic Salmon Coalition and Olympic Wetland Resources Page i December 20, 2012 t� J TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No Contents Introduction and Project Description 3 PROJECT SCOPE 4 PAPER INVENTORY Error! Bookmark not defined. BUFFER IMPACTS/FUNCTION/MITIGATION 5 Snow and Salmon Creek 5 Buffer Functions 6 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 9 Water Quality 9 Noise Quality 9 Construction Activities Impacts 9 Occupational Impacts 10 Species Habitat Quality 10 Habitat Management Plan Summary 10 List of Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Water Bodies 12 Figure 2 Snow/Salmon Creek Estuary and Nearshore Restoration Area .13 Figure 3 Site Plan and Vicinity Map 14 Page ii December 20, 2012 7e of� Habitat Management Plan Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project December 2012 Introduction and Project Description This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) will address the potential impacts within the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project and all associated components. This report has been prepared by NOSC and Olympic Wetland Resources. Recommendations outlined below are in compliance with the Jefferson County Critical Area Code (18.22.440). This project is split between habitat restoration of marine nearshore, and the relocation of a waterline (displaced by the restoration) to the highway 101 right of way, and location of a regional trail along a portion of the new waterline alignment in the highway right of way. The restoration site is categorized as a `terrestrial/nearshore marine' type. Upland vegetation in the restoration project areas is generally comprised of invasive weedy species, with some young alder. Below the high tide line, areas of the project area contain high salt marsh plant communities, beach and mudflat. Restoration actions include modification and removal of an abandoned railroad (RR) grade that causes severe habitat degradation in the area, removal of dredge spoils from the banks of Snow Creek, removal of creosote RR bridges and creek reconnections to the nearshore. Habitat conditions along the waterline/trail alignment are poor. This is a highway right of way and has been maintained as such, where it is not mowed, it is generally covered in blackberries, with limited native vegetation in the trail/waterline corridor. It offers little habitat value, with limited potential for an increase in this value. The restoration project will create 8.8 acres of Category I wetlands by removal of the railroad grade. The project restores ecological function and historic habitat values to areas extending beyond the 8.8 acres estimated at 35.7 acres. The only long term project impacts are the constructed trail and abutments for waterline bridges which together modify .69 acres of DOT right of way within stream, wetland or marine shoreline buffers. Impact ratios are .69 acres impacted to 8.8 acres mitigated. The property is owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)and was purchased for habitat restoration. A waterline runs through the property on the RR grade, it is privately owned and because the restoration project is not possible with it in this alignment, it will be realigned along Highway 101. Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 3 The project removes 33,827 cubic yards of soil from the marine shoreline. 4700 cubic yards of fill will be placed in the DOT right of way between 20 and 80 feet from the marine shoreline as a trail prism. The project will be phased. Waterline construction will take place first`Fall/Winter 2013. Restoration actions will follow during fish windows in the Summer/Fall of 2014. Trail construction may take place at any point during or after this timeline and is contingent upon funding. Critical Areas of concern have been evaluated and categorized in the attached report prepared by Olympic Wetland Resources, Lower Discovery Bay Restoration Project, Maynard Nearshore Trail/Waterline Project, Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Project (November 2012). Included in that report are site locations, critical areas, and soil maps. Also evaluated was the vegetation present in the critical areas, wetland categorizations, and buffer sizes. Impacts around the buffers of the wetlands delineated in the named report are more than mitigated with the restoration plan. This HMP will address the buffer impacts of the proposed waterline directional drilling at Snow and Salmon Creek, regional trail construction within 150 feet of the marine shoreline and within 150 feet of a Category II Wetland. PROJECT SCOPE NOSC has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species, wetland boundaries and types, and topographic survey. This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: Presents detailed maps of the proposed project location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. Maps follow at the end of this document and plansets are submitted as part of the JARPA package. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications within marine shoreline, wetland, and stream buffers. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. Prepares a plan that explains how NOSC will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 4 OG ITEW_ METHODS Page o f „/49_, PAPER INVENTORY NOSC completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005); the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound (NOAA 2006); the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database (Jefferson County 2007); the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP) (DNR 2006); the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) maps and database (WDFW 2007); the WDFW SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003); and the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1975 and 2001) BUFFER IMPACTS/FUNCTION/MITIGATION Snow and Salmon Creek Snow Creek is listed as a Type "S" Shoreline Stream and Salmon Creek is listed as,a Type "F" Fish Bearing Stream on the Jefferson Critical Areas Map with associated 150 foot buffers. The waterline construction path will be approximately 10 feet wide approaching the stream buffers. The waterline crossing at Snow Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the south side of the Snow Creek Bridge. The waterline crossing at Salmon Creek will occur within the SR 101 right of way on the north side of the Salmon Creek Bridge. Horizontal directional drilling (HDD) will be used to install a 12-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) casing. The drill entry and exit points for the HDD will be 75 feet upland of ordinary high water at Snow Creek and 100 feet upland from ordinary high water at Salmon Creek. The vertical alignment at both creeks will be at least 10 feet below the stream bed and approximately 200 feet in length. Bentonite drilling fluid will be used during the bore, to maintain the hole size during reaming, and to facilitate the pipe string pull back. Cuttings, tailings, and the bentonite drilling fluid will be disposed of off-site at an approved disposal site. Due to building and driveways Snow Creek Buffer has been greatly reduced from 150 feet, the remaining buffer for Snow Creek is 60 feet to the south and 40 to the north or a total of 100 feet. The square foot area for mitigation is calculated at 10' X 100' for a total of 1000 square feet. Buffers at Salmon Creek are vegetated the entire length with grasses and blackberry and will be calculated at 150 feet to the north and south for a total of 300 feet or 3,000 square feet of impact. Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 5 EGG of Cherry Pond Wetland The Cherry Pond is an unnatural Category II wetland formed when the RR grade closed off a creek mouth to form the pond between the grade and the upland (Hwy 101). The project will convert the wetland to a Category I wetland by removing a portion of the RR grade and allowing saltwater influence to the area again. The project will also build a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail along the upland edge of the wetland approximately 40 feet from the designated wetland boundary. The trail will be built on land that is currently maintained as highway shoulder with no native plant removals needed adjacent to the wetland. An existing native plant community (alders and shrub layer) will remain fringing the wetland and separating the trail from the wetland. The wetland buffer impact of the trail is calculated at 14'x700' for a total of 9800 square feet. A fill of the wetland measuring 154 square feet with an estimated volume of 100 cu/yds will occur to create space for the Olympic Discovery Trail. This occurs in the only location that the wetland boundary crosses onto the WSDOT right of way. A culvert conveying a non-fish bearing stream enters the wetland here and will be extended before the fill is placed. Marine Shoreline Where the trail does not border the Cherry Pond it is between 40 and 60' of the marine shoreline. Buffers in this area may be as much as 150' (Jefferson UDC Table 18.22.270(2): Buffers for Other FWHCAs). The trail in this area will be constructed in an area currently maintained as a highway shoulder. Vegetation removal will be limited to invasive species, occasional small alders and 2 or 3 conifers smaller than 30' tall. The impact is calculated at 14'x1136' for a total of 15,904 square feet. Buffer Functions Wetland buffers, shoreline buffers, and shoreline streams and fish-bearing stream buffers perform important protective functions. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. The buffer directly adjacent to Snow Creek consists of mature alders shading the stream. The understory of the remaining buffer between the buildings and driveways consists of non-native species dominated by Himalayan blackberry and reed canarygrass. Overall there is a low quality habitat due to buffer reduction and lack of species diversity. The buffers on both sides of Salmon Creek are dominated by a shrub layer of Himalayan blackberry with few trees or other native shrubs. The buffer along the Cherry Pond and the Marine shoreline where the trail will be installed is characterized by a band of trees (mostly alder with some conifer and a brush understory) between 20 and 40 feet wide and immediately adjacent to the waters edge. Beyond this area and where the trail will be installed, the vegetation is primarily pasture grasses and himilayan blackberry and scotch broom. The project will plant disturbed areas with native shrub and tree species thereby increasing the quality and functions of the buffers. Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 6 � - Impact Mitigation r 7qe The restoration project will create 8.8 acres of Category I wetlands by removal of the railroad grade. The project restores ecological function and historic habitat values to areas extending beyond the 8.8 acres estimated at 35.7 acres restored. The only long term project impacts are the constructed trail which modify 29,858 sq ft(.69 acres) of DOT right of way within stream, wetland or marine shoreline buffers. Immediately adjacent to these impacts invasive weed removal and native plantings to mitigate local impacts will cover—.8 acres (Fig 5, planting plan). Impact ratios are .69 acres impacted to 9.6 acres mitigated by wetland creation and restoration plantings. Priority Habitat and Species No current endangered or threatened plants is listed within the section the proposed development. Information gathered for Priority Habitat Species in the vicinity is summarized below. Species Federal Habitats used and project benefits Recovery Plans for Each and State Species Status Hood Canal Federal Snow/Salmon Estuary is critical habitat for summer Summer Chum Summer Threatened chum with documented use by juveniles from Conservation Initiative Chum and State February-May. Chum fry have been sampled in the (2000): The goal is to Candidate salt marsh and mud flat tidal channels during spring protect and restore fyke net monitoring (2009-2012), schools are visible estuarine rearing habitats. along the area beaches during outmigration. The estuary provides essential food and cover for juvenile Summer Chum Recovery summer chum and a critical transition area for Plan (2005) returning adults. Puget Federal Steelhead spawn in the mainstem of Salmon and Snow Salmon and Steelhead Sound Threatened Creeks, populations are critically low. Restoration of Habitat Limiting Factors: Steelhead and State estuary will provide transition habitat for outmigrating WRIA 17., HCCC Salmon Candidate and returning fish. Recovery Strategy Federal Recovery Plan in Development Puget Federal Discovery Bay, including the project sites, is critical Salmon and Steelhead Sound Threatened habitat for non-natal juvenile chinook that use the bay Habitat Limiting Factors: Chinook and State before migrating to deeper water. Protection and WRIA 17 Candidate restoration of the slopes, shorelines, and tidelands Regional Nearshore and around the bay will directly benefit water quality and Marine Aspects of Salmon rearing habitat in Discovery Bay Watershed. Recovery in Puget Sound (Puget Sound Action Team, 2005) Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan(2007) Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 7 _1GITEW 4 r", e of Marbled Federal and Forages in marine waters and near the mouths of Marbled Murrelet Murrelet State rivers. The restoration of the intertidal forage fish Recovery Plan—manage Threatened habitat will support the feeding grounds of murrelets. habitat for breeding and Cited as a fall/winter migrant in Discovery Bay by foraging Admiralty Audubon. Bald Eagle Federal Four bald eagle territories have been documented in Bald Eagle Recovery Species the area. Eagles utilize the area for feeding during Plan: manage habitat for of Concern salmon spawning and waterfowl migration season. breeding, winter roosting and Bald Eagles will benefit from increased prey levels. and foraging State Bald Eagles have been observed foraging in the Sensitive project area by NOSC Staff and local landowners throughout the year. Puget Federal Coho juveniles use the floodplain as overwintering Washington State Priority Sound Species of habitat. Coho juveniles and adults use the estuary as Habitats and Coho Concern and critical transition habitat. Coho juveniles are voracious Species(PHS) List(2008) State predators using tidal channels and the nearshore to Candidate find prey, such as forage fish. Juveniles have been No Recovery Plan for observed utilizing the estuary during spring fyke net Federal Species of monitoring (2009-2012). Concern Southern Federal The marine waters adjacent to the project area are Resident Endangered listed as critical habitat for Southern Resident Killer Killer Whales. Whale Species State Habitats used and project benefits Recovery Plans for Status Each Species Merlin State Forage during the non- breeding season in open areas No Recovery Plan for Candidate such as estuaries and wetlands including the project unlisted species. State area. The project will restore foraging habitat. Status determined from Common State Restoring the forested slopes adjacent to the tidelands Washington State Priority Murre Candidate and important forage fish spawning beaches will Habitats and increase prey levels and maintain water quality in the Species(PHS) List(2008) bay for common murres. High numbers observed during Christmas bird count in 2007. Western State Restoring the tidelands and important forage fish Grebe Candidate spawning beaches will increase prey levels and water quality in the estuary for Western Grebe. Large flocks observed during Christmas bird counts in 2007. Common State Project protects nearshore marine waters used for Loon Sensitive winter foraging for adult birds. Cited by Admiralty Audubon as a fall/winter visitor. Olympia State Project area supports a population of Olympia oysters Oyster Candidate (Ostrea lurida). WDFW and the Marine Resources Committee have developed a monitoring program for this unique population of Olympia Oysters along the Maynard Nearshore. Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 8 � G IT t ge ` __Of_ --- Trumpeter Priority Project protects nearshore marine water Swan Species winter foraging for adult birds. Waterfowl Priority Project protects nearshore marine waters used for and Species winter foraging for adult birds Shorebird Congregati ons Estuarine Priority Project restores X acres of this priority habitat. Intertidal Habitat POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality Disturbance will occur in buffer areas during project construction. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Post construction impacts to surface water drainage are not expected. The trail is being designed to not concentrate water into distinct flow paths which might lead to rilling and erosion. Rather, stormwater will leave the downhill side of the trail evenly along its entire length for infiltration on the slope below. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. The site is extremely noisy currently due to its extreme proximity to Hwy 101. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM) working hours. Construction Activities Impacts Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. Construction staging will be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground will occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 9 _OG ITE r 7 ,7 e of 9 application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts Trail users will be required to remain on the constructed trail for their safety but also to avoid impacts within buffer areas and plantings. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the areas impacted by trail and waterline infrastructure, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by these species. Existing invasive vegetation (Himalayan blackberry, Scotch Broom) will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow,Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table (Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Mitigation planting will take place along streamside buffers disturbed by waterline directional drilling activities and between the trail and the shoreline. Planted species will include douglas fir, shore pine, snowberry, nootka rose, and madrone. Conifers will be planted on 10' centers where appropriate.Shrub species will be planted on 5' centers. Plants will be native stock in 1 gallon pots. Planting activities will occur after all construction activities are complete. Construction timing will be such that plantings can occur in the winter or early spring which maximizes plant survival. Plants will be watered during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. The plantings will be monitored for survival. Dead plants will be removed and replaced. The plantings will be maintained to avoid re- establishment and competition from invasive species. Habitat Management Plan Summary This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: The project restores 35.7 acres of marine shoreline by restoration of ecological processes, directly creates 8.8 acres of Category I wetlands, and plants .8 acres adjacent to developmental project elements in buffers; Development aspects of the project have impacts to .69 acres of buffer habitat in the project area; Stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; Enhancement and restoration of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, undesirable species and replanting with native species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 10 rO ITE W 7qe ( of2Q implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the minor impacts within the buffers will be easily compensated for by the mitigation measures. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition Dixie Llewellin Principal Biologist, Olympic Wetland Resources Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 11 ,.._________t______..0 IT E:.— Y ����` ■ r �`^ Maynard Lagoon j ��, . . �IMil{Pond �. "�� `; ' � � � � � �' * Maynard Nearshore ' � �her Restoration > Pond f Discovery y Bay , y� f � u, xY ' w'r . „�. t;'. r tt -:' ` `saesY s �c �'� " +tom r '"; `s r"' . "! r ' ' 'fff r # .4.,r," 'mow ' �, . » -' „ .. i 4 4 y, t'. �E '@'OF If"..4'1.0:44;.' N ` . . Snow Creek Estuary Restoration and � `* * + Railroad Grade Removal :41P'..:_,-:41'1.4:1',(t...-• tiN ' %fi � ,ft4 * „...... . .ii A**1, ...,, Discovery Bay Restoration: 'Mc°"" Vicinity Waterbodies —snow and salmon Creeks snow ECOLOGY - 'Waterline Relocation Railroad .,....010 N 0 230 460 Feet Olympic Discovery Trail ®Maynard Nearsttore Restoration H” AI Discovery$ay Water Bodies Railroad Trestles .,•,,, ' Discovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 12 v `--,,,., , .,, >m . _.,, ------ 4 s. s a, ` fi Maynard Nearshore yi Restoration �m� , Discovery Bay ,......:,. A , y„ e ,, \ �k, .*V....*::„',,;",', -011.e.,k, - , -# t s , .ro $# `"4 �' ! AMY „yit 4,0). 1 Jam„ ,.,„7,1„...,„- )10, ry' 1 *":144$ gg 1. .'' ' N\1-'it4*t?..t.1.4.4*''I°'..p :Yr* '-' ' 4'''''''i ° ' ' '*ritit ....i„ �"v`� '�"� rr11" -.e' � � '° Cry I � . t s / g .r� f '�•-s P� 1 -, Y H / °,t/IA-, A-1 ' ' „„,..,-' _ _ W _ _ ..� - - `, Snow Creek Estuary Restoration ®i '`'ce and Railroad Grade Removal I • .�/ Snow/Salmon Creek Estuary and " E Nearshore Restoration snow and Samon creaks ;snow Creek Estuary r.i -.44.744 '4*'''b''''',::)...,' ,,... - ' ,''S ' 4' . i i I of Waterline RelocaUOn Railroad Grade Removal ECOLOGY Nrrr...(Mn `op` o. III N 245 490 Feet �+�Olympic Discovery Trail Maynard Nearshore RestoraWn A f d J 1 I WDF1N Property ♦ Railroad Trestles `..... rDiscovery Bay Restoration Project Habitat Management Plan Page 13 - it . . ...- OG ITEM . . A L'i,-........... -, -. 4 Ye .Air, •.,. - OLD GARDINER RD • ,:',",' • Ci4 I . -,...i,.. ..;::....7.."':•;-''''') .-1,''' / - -< —I Z e > . 4‘,..,,, 4g m ia - , .•4., ,. 0 :1 '-'. , , • r- •,. ' 0 m ..".4 „„. .;,.',,•.,,,,. * e.";,.....'..,,,_ ,,...i,..4, :'.. , . Z 7 --''-•''''',.'',4,-1 4-..7.e,-',1,,4''''' 1 ''. 'C':44,7";'-' ..„, .- C- m 73 [i • 0 -‹ ' - ,..,... , • , ,,t,....:: ...:...(D,.,,..,,... •■ ' cr) • : M ,. .._... ..'.. C") R4oz cm z ..• rn a... 0 [I •A-A4c' S.,.. ,-- ft 3i:i a9 • :e.j•----':: ,_-...-.. .. . /)0 ,,, 0, m ,-, - .... = •■••••••■ g i'age 14 1....tat-ovciy Lay Acatutatautt t tujcut Itatntrat tviattabcitictit t tali Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11:53 AM To:To: Mary Blain Cc: Jodi Adams Subject: RE: NOSC building permit application fee Mary: Reinforced slopes greater than 4 feet in height require a building permit. The application that Kevin Long(NOSC) submitted last week requires a building permit for reinforced slopes as well as other project features. Let me know if you have any questions. Donna From: Mary Blain Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11:36 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: NOSC building permit application fee Donna, Thought you might be able to help with this. Thanks! Mary Blain Permit Technician Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4452 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain @co.iefferson.wa.us All email to or from this email address may be subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. From: Kevin Long [mailto:projectmanagerOnosc.orq] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 11:27 AM To: Mary Blain; Jodi Adams Subject: NOSC building permit application fee Hi Mary,Jodi, 1 I have some cost estimates of the structures that would be built as part of the Lower Discovery Bay Restoration project. It is not clear to me if reinforced slopes are structures that are permitted through your building department. I have included them below if this is the case. IT. LUG Estimated Construction Costs: #' Trail: Soldier Pile Wall=$70,000 page of Trail: Rock Wall over 4 feet=$84,000 Trail: Reinforced Slope=$144,000 Waterline Vaults, 2 each @ $9,000=$18,000 I understand the building permit fee is for review by your building permit technicians/engineers.The design set I provided with the application show trail items listed above are designed to the 50%level and waterline elements at 90% design. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 2 1 LOG ITE Vr Donna Frostholm From: Linda Atkins P-Y--�--/- Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 3:55 PM ---�' -- •-. To: 'KevinL' Cc: Susan Porto; Randy Marx; rbenjamin @nosc.org; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration Kevin, Review of most applications received by DCD includes review by the Health Department. In this case you are applying for a Shoreline Permit that we will review. They generally will collect the fees for this review at the time of application. In the case that there is an onsite sewage system on the property a monitoring inspection is required. If we have no records of the system and its location, a full evaluation including identifying system component locations is required. This is covered in JC8.15.150 (7). The report must be submitted via the online reporting program,OnlineRME. The form is individual for each system and the licensed designer is responsible for entering the system components and inspection results. One of the requirements is to complete and submit a site plan identifying component locations. Our review can't be completed until this is submitted and reviewed to determine if we can approve the project or if alterations are required. It is likely that there will be conditions placed on the project specific to the septic system components. Mike Deeney is a Licensed Designer and is qualified to complete this work. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer aruf healthier Jefferson County CObFIDEVTIALITY 1OTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Crider the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56 From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.org] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:07 PM To: Linda Atkins Cc: Susan Porto; Randy Marx; rbenjamin @nosc.org Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration Linda, Are there permits or a process I need to get started with the county to perform a "Full Monitoring Inspection"? If so please advise and provide applicable materials. I assume Mike Deeney would be a contractor that performs this sort of work? If not can you tell me who does this. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 1 From: Linda Atkins [mailto:latkins@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:38 PM , To: KevinL ..JG ITE% Cc: Susan Porto; Randy Marx Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration Page Kevin, Perhaps I wasn't clear in my previous response. Any project submittal to the county will require a full monitoring inspection verifying the drainfield location. No approval for work can be given until the drainfield location is known. We cannot give a conditional approval saying"if you find something......." Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Aways'working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County tV FIDENTIALITY \OTIC'E: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at KW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including ROT 42.56. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager@a nosc.orq] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:22 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration Oh man, I'm slippin! I leave on vacation tomorrow, maybe my brain left early. Here's the text. 10. A septic drain field is located in the project area on the east bank of Snow Creek. Including septic drainfield decommissioning as part of the project is contingent on finding a location for, and constructing, a new, permitted drain field. If a replacement septic field is not built, restoration plans in the footprint of the septic field will be abandoned until such time that a replacement is built. At the time of this submittal (April 2013), a suitable site has not been located. Current plans are for the drainfield to be abandoned in place. Due to the placement of 1994 creek dredging spoils on top of the septic field to depths near 6 feet,the planned excavation depths in the area of 3-4 feet are not expected to encounter the septic field.(Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Design 100% Sheet 8?)(This is still being drafted FYI) If during project construction the septic field is encountered, the soils/piping will be hauled to the Jefferson County Waste Transfer Facility for disposal. This is allowable by their standards (Al Cairns email,JeffCo Dept of Public Works 2/20/13). Hauling vehicles will be required to completely contain all soils and water excavated. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager@nosc.org (360)379-8051 2 From: Linda Atkins [mailto:latkins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:19 AM u �r To: KevinL Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration Kevin, I don't see any language "below"that you referred to in the email???? Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County C2NPIDENTIALITY;VOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipients) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intender/recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN'4256 trader the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN'42 56. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orq] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:37 AM To: Linda Atkins Cc: Susan Porto; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration HI Linda, Further restoration design work in the area of the Moa septic has proven interesting. It looks like we may not need to disturb the septic field to do our desired work. Below is the language I am working up to include in the JARPA app based on this information and what I've learned from you. I am wondering how this approach might work,and if there are items I haven't considered that I need to. I remain hopeful we will be abandoning that septic field. While progress on a new site and system is slow, it IS progressing. We hope to submit the permit package for the project in early April. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Linda Atkins [mailto:latkins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:56 PM To: KevinL Cc: Susan Porto; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration See my responses below Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 3 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County COVIDENTTALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the,jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42 56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager(anosc.orq] -- G ITE. Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:14 AM To: Linda Atkins •_age Of Cc: Susan Porto Subject: Septic field removal/alteration Hi Linda, Our conversation yesterday was good to get my wheels turning to figure out what it is I really need to know, but leaves me wondering how to best proceed. I am attempting to assess constraints at the site,we are entering a restoration design phase for the area of the septic field and these constraints inform our chosen path, specifically by how the constraints might impact cost. Remaining questions: 1) Our conversation suggested a septic field that has been abandoned for 1 year will not be subject to shoreline setbacks.True? It's actually surface water(100')or bank(50')setbacks,whichever is greater. Shoreline setbacks are a different animal. 2) It seems easier/cheaper not to ever touch the area of the septic even once it is abandoned. However, it is likely that some portion of a future restoration project will end up disturbing septic field soils. If it is more than a year from the time it is decommissioned/last used,then you could disturb it and not need to take any special measures. If we remove septic field soils will they be accepted at the dump?You would need to contact the solid waste facility directly. Is there a timeframe after decommissioning that makes acceptance at the dump more likely?Same as before,They would need to make that determination. 3) To treat the soils with the lime and turning method you mention we would need to provide another site on which to do this. Do you have guidelines on where a site like this should be located and protocols for treatment that we can refer to. You could potentially do it on site in an area that meets the setbacks. Following are the general guidelines: The material that is removed from the drainfield must be treated/decontaminated prior to final disposal.The material from the system shall be removed and stockpiled to allow for pathogen die-off. The material shall be placed in 6"-8" lifts and spread with lime.The location for the stockpile shall be approved by the Health Officer and shall meet all requirements of an onsite sewage system (setbacks from surface waters and wells and vertical separation). It shall be covered and protected from erosion (covered with plastic or several inches of uncontaminated soil and straw,etc.). After the material has been stockpiled for a minimum of one year,the material may be used with out site restrictions. Other alternatives may be proposed and reviewed by the Health Officer. I realize there is no requirement for turning,just placing in lifts with lime between. 4) I am considering submitting the septic field restoration actions with my project JARPA for adjacent restorations actions.Timing of the actions would depend on some of the above answers. I am not sure how to best incorporate the actions into the permit application to ease potential complications with Community and Environmental health restrictions and guidelines. I see submitting the JARPA hopefully by mid-March. It would be very helpful to know where the drainfield is in relation to the work you are proposing. Has any more work been done to establish its location and characteristics? If the JARPA has proposed work in proximity,<100'of the drainfield,the alternate plans and approval will need to be in place prior to approval. I am not seeing that you have made any application for work to the county yet??? Is that true?Am I missing something? Maybe some research and another sit down is in order?Thanks for your help! Kevin 4 Kevin Long °vG I :. Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalitionpe O f proiectmanager( nosc.org — (360)379-8051 5 Donna Frostholm From: KevinL [projectmanager @ nosc.org] _.. G IT Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:37 AM To: Linda Atkins Cc: Susan Porto; Donna Frostholm e % $ Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration HI Linda, Further restoration design work in the area of the Moa septic has proven interesting. It looks like we may not need to disturb the septic field to do our desired work. Below is the language I am working up to include in the JARPA app based on this information and what I've learned from you. I am wondering how this approach might work,and if there are items I haven't considered that I need to. I remain hopeful we will be abandoning that septic field.While progress on a new site and system is slow, it IS progressing. We hope to submit the permit package for the project in early April. Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 From: Linda Atkins [mailto:latkins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:56 PM To: KevinL Cc: Susan Porto; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Septic field removal/alteration See my responses below Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 ACways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY:NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(S) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. tnder the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager@ nosc.orq] Sent:Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:14 AM To: Linda Atkins Cc: Susan Porto Subject: Septic field removal/alteration Hi Linda, Our conversation yesterday was good to get my wheels turning to figure out what it is I really need to know, but leaves me wondering how to best proceed. I am attempting to assess constraints at the site,we are enters ra�jj • ation design phase for the area of the septic field and these constraints inform our chosen path, specifies hb Ca`e_ constraints might impact cost. F..age of mow. Remaining questions: 1) Our conversation suggested a septic field that has been abandoned for 1 year will not be subject to shoreline setbacks.True? It's actually surface water(100')or bank(50')setbacks,whichever is greater. Shoreline setbacks are a different animal. 2) It seems easier/cheaper not to ever touch the area of the septic even once it is abandoned. However, it is likely that some portion of a future restoration project will end up disturbing septic field soils. If it is more than a year from the time it is decommissioned/last used,then you could disturb it and not need to take any special measures. If we remove septic field soils will they be accepted at the dump?You would need to contact the solid waste facility directly. Is there a timeframe after decommissioning that makes acceptance at the dump more likely?Same as before,They would need to make that determination. 3) To treat the soils with the lime and turning method you mention we would need to provide another site on which to do this. Do you have guidelines on where a site like this should be located and protocols for treatment that we can refer to. You could potentially do it on site in an area that meets the setbacks. Following are the general guidelines: The material that is removed from the drainfield must be treated/decontaminated prior to final disposal.The material from the system shall be removed and stockpiled to allow for pathogen die-off. The material shall be placed in 6"-8" lifts and spread with lime.The location for the stockpile shall be approved by the Health Officer and shall meet all requirements of an onsite sewage system(setbacks from surface waters and wells and vertical separation). It shall be covered and protected from erosion(covered with plastic or several inches of uncontaminated soil and straw,etc.). After the material has been stockpiled for a minimum of one year,the material may be used with out site restrictions. Other alternatives may be proposed and reviewed by the Health Officer. I realize there is no requirement for turning,just placing in lifts with lime between. 4) I am considering submitting the septic field restoration actions with my project JARPA for adjacent restorations actions.Timing of the actions would depend on some of the above answers. I am not sure how to best incorporate the actions into the permit application to ease potential complications with Community and Environmental health restrictions and guidelines. I see submitting the JARPA hopefully by mid-March. It would be very helpful to know where the drainfield is in relation to the work you are proposing. Has any more work been done to establish its location and characteristics? If the JARPA has proposed work in proximity,<100'of the drainfield,the alternate plans and approval will need to be in place prior to approval. I am not seeing that you have made any application for work to the county yet??? Is that true?Am I missing something? Maybe some research and another sit down is in order?Thanks for your help! Kevin Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org (360)379-8051 2 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm LUG ITEM Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:31 PM To: 'KevinL' (71— Subject: RE: JARPA submittal question cyLL Kevin: You do not need to submit the SEPA checklist or technical reports or stormwater calculation worksheet to state agencies as DCD will send out the applicable information to state agencies and tribes when the application is noticed. You should contact the Corps of Engineers to determine what they want included in the submittal for federal permitting. Regards, Danwux,Fro -thoLvw Associate PCanner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community DeveCopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrosthohn@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: KevinL [mailto:Drojectmanager©nosc.orq] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:51 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: JARPA submittal question Donna, When I submit the Discovery Bay Project JARPA to you and other agencies I am not clear on what items needs to go to all agencies, I am hoping you can help. Specifically, does any agency besides the County need to receive my SEPA checklist, Habitat Management Plan,the geotechnical reports, and stormwater calculation worksheet?This will be a significant permit package and I do not want to make the application burdensome to wade through for agencies not requiring said documents. FYI-We've been held up getting our geotechnical report to meet county requirements, but should be submitting in early April. Thank you, Kevin Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanager @nosc.org 1 PRE12-00018 P FAA re-application Conference North Olympic Salmon Coalition P40--p Discovery Bay Improvements ® Attendees: Kevin Long, Applicant; Rick Mraz,Washington State Department of Ecology; Bridget Kaminsky-Richardson, Lisa Kaufman, Jeff Schreck, Washington State Department of Natural Resources; Margie Schirato, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Susan Porto, Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health; Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County Department of Community Development Meeting Date/Time/Location: September 6, 2012/10:00/Onsite Applicant:Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Representative: Kevin Long, NOSC 600 Capitol Way North 205B W. Patison Street Olympia, Washington 98501 Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Description of Proposal: The applicants are proposing removal of a portion of the water line, reconstruction of a new water alignment, relocation of a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail, and restoration of a portion of the shoreline. The proposal is located at the south end of Discovery Bay. The Jefferson County Code is available on-line at http://www.codepublishinq.com/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Land Use: • Zoning—Rural Residential 1:5, Commercial Agriculture, Neighborhood/Visitor Crossroad. • SEPA(WAC 197-11)—The proposal is subject to review under SEPA. Submit an Environmental Checklist. Shoreline Master Plan (Title 18.25 JCC): • Shoreline Designation —Suburban, portions of open water are designated as Conservancy and Natural. XA shoreline exemption may be possible for restoration activities to benefit fish and wildlife habitat under JCC 18.25.090(18)(b). If the restoration portion of the proposal does not meet either exemption, it will be a permitted as a shoreline substantial development permit(see below). • Any portion of the application that does not meet the requirements for a shoreline exemption will be processed as a shoreline substantial development permit. As per the requirements of Chapter 18.25 JCC -Shoreline Master Program (SMP), the application f would be reviewed as a secondary use and conditional use. The project would be reviewed as a Type III process that requires noticing and a public hearing, with the final decision made by the Hearing Examiner(for compliance with the JCC SMP conditions). Jefferson County will forward a copy of the application and the hearing examiner decision to Washington State Department of Ecology. This agency will have final review of the project for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act. • To comply with permitting requirements, the applicant must demonstrate that the following sections of the SMP are met: JCC 18.25.110—Aquatic; JCC 18.25.120— t ,• \Natural; JCC 18.25.130—Conservancy; JCC 18.25.200—Conditional uses; JCC '"`°r, Y')." 18.25.220—Unclassified Uses; JCC 18.25.440—Transportation facilities; and JCC I ,' '1 18.25.450— Utilities. x tix • Regulatory requirements described above are based on current SMP requirements. Note: If a complete application is not received before the SMP update becomes effective, the application will be reviewed based on criteria specified in the new SMP. As currently identified in the Locally Approved SMP (dated 12-7-09), this application would be reviewed using a Conditional (Administrative) process. The shoreline designation under the new SMP will be Conservancy and Aquatic. The Locally Approved SMP can be found online on the SMP Update webpage, and construction of a tram would be reviewed under: o Article 6-general policies and regulations; o Article 7.4—filling and excavation; v, o Article 7.7—restoration; •�. .__ . - --� o Article 8.10—transportation; o Article 8.11 -utilities o Article 9—conditional use permit criteria or variance permit criteria. Critical Areas: • Geologically Hazardous Areas— Parcels are mapped as a geologically hazardous area (unstable and intermediate shoreline slope stability, seismic hazard). Submit a geotechnical report prepared by a geologist or engineer that has original stamp and signature. Geotechnical report must be prepared based on Articles V(Geologically Hazardous Areas) and VIII (Special Reports) of Chapter 18.22 JCC. • Wetlands—Wetlands are mapped in the project area. Submit a wetland report based on Articles VII (Wetlands) and VIII (Special Reports)of Chapter 18.22 JCC. • Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA)—Streams and marine systems are a FWHCA in Jefferson County. Submit a Habitat Management Plan based on Articles VI (FWHCA) and VIII (Special Reports). • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (high risk) and Aquifer Recharge Area (susceptible)— Project must comply with Jefferson County EH requirements. Stormwater: • Proposal must comply with JCC 18.30.060 (Grading and excavation standards) and JCC 18.30.070 (Stormwater management standards). • Proposal is to be designed based on the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. • All plans submitted must be stamped by a project engineer. Application and Fees: • Complete Application includes the following: o Master Permit Application (agent for JARPA must sign this form) o Environmental Checklist o JARPA(must include Attachment A for all property owners) o Development Drawings o Site Plan o Stormwater Calculation Worksheet o Engineered Stormwater Plan • Geotechnical Report • Wetland Report • Habitat Management Plank • Fees due at the time of application: $2,158 shoreline conditional use4$54& s1ie e .exe ptieR3; $740-SEPA review. • A building permit may beTequi er d. Building permit fees are in addition to the permitting fees listed above. • Any permits required from Jefferson County Environmental Health are in addition to those listed above. AGENCY USE ONLY WASHINGTON STATE oSEAnrgiiyeC er° Seethe District k+ " ii 9 i i }r Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) Form 1,2 ,. t rJ USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. k 1 - Part 1—Project Identification £.# ° !s s a •i j ( Io m Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] a�°i � e `First, P '� ..... i� iii .•V':. � ,� .I11tiii ( !z i tt(-1t C ppJ b10 1i c gailly 1 i - . M_1r'ess(Street 8px} g: g 11*J ice^ a 6t 3. Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Regulatory/PermitGuidebook/EndangeredSpecies.aspx. • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermittinq.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/iarpa iarpa form/9984/iarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help c(D,ora.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 14 LAG !TPM Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact -- --� p N z"Ipp Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. Nat�s°t�'attro�� ent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [help] I J 1^ A I I I s s� a _ -�= °� - 1 I � �,v I r i 1 I I = .g, I �v r ao �(I appl ,; 3� I g I' w L (Street o f Box) s w Oem��,N _ e, 1� - 'I1 - I�r r 1 -' c — 1i- _ O 4 ��' ,,I, r� ml '€ iHI lip I P JI iII4I t i„' IS" ;_ A' y ' ari _ w`r _ ,ad �II III II #._� h,=-. 1, � N , � irll I �� t '1 q ( #' �'1..F .. .. 111111 r E rn X11 ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [help] ❑ Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) [' There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ['Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4 r•_lr' �ll�� 14 3 i h7 (t�Id ��ai , =,h•= r 4b. (' ii" nization(i ppl cable)' N ' 4c A (Street or ' ox) 4d. Cif, t te, Zip a 4el one(1 I , , , ra :.y fir•Pl on ( � 4g ° e t t 41 . E "fail : . a_ ti` ( ) ( ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 14 , r • Pa6-Part 5-Project Location(i) ` _ d Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. h( ell El There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 3I P _ ,, 1, {I 1 k ritr� T y lI i +t UHi , ,, s ner hip of the `o hec 1t tth`=j ®. i's� 1 „` ❑ Private ❑ Federal ❑ Publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) —managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) ip � , Address r of aP . ..,,,, dr �� sN" ' '� t��tn a a ( . ub aa' ,i 0 i � i i I i, 3 �u dte rest y � N .}, „ Stte p f ®tl2 = not n a ciow o iu e (7 . n[ , � d 5c� , # 7 w ( ll L .i tw 9 mm I� i I ' �a�� � i' t a wa 0�. d I I �, � 7 7}_ � .o G ' 0 4 - 1,,„4AR E . ,A> 1 1 J i €�utr a r ® :} !. n., rt t�tw�i� � -p II L hilt v'� y i _ ' i 7( -� ���Et+- �t3r�'.'��j f� �i�F4 ��the ` +i n, to In k d I t t9ii q ect r's1 oo "i �� „F- �r� . 9 r i 1 :�'1,h Y I� tf' ,._.. } 5 } o 4il�li,o t rjy_' h + e1 _ i tI 'si i' �, x, , ® r wyi Yv rte {��4 �*p� i h � 1 9i i' , i J, and long it a „ lroj bo .g id i - } __ _ 1 I��' a 4 ,, x) 57 �i} p<<.. <a 7175' �� 4" k i �i F '- - - ,' a.,,:t ft "t.; - �,u �► ,e3922 N tat ;-122.;9142 long (Use Iec l ® greys 'D 8 _.,, ,Pr_ ,r Ea i � . �t 1 number(a)f€ h roj t location. o ' © c n� sso's o cai ide tb fo ati ! "gyp ` .F 4 �� nt nformatto r, ad of ing r per y ra n . (tf Sneed mo sp ant .)eIhelol i �' �� ice us+�,lAF �t � a � MailinAc ess ( a 7f Page 3 of 14 JARPA Revision 2012.1 LC,3 !TPA 51,: List all ►etl t car a tbitt the proje tilO: do it, 1I Page of 1 1 1� t. ryr 1 ler � retl nd •P r t# ,t o the pp eot iocat� t a an pry q++ �iwtzn a 11 IO ear tr? ,� w 4 ya Intl ( t�= `� �� 'ii 1 �� i, ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know bnFand tat tat don rt ppert n� - per 1 � i m a � �lon°ip � Ullt ii 1 �31 1 1��1 �I ' � r- �i �.. '"g i, s, a `; t l e how t e a p c perities are currently;used 5O ea e �� s b v+� nd elowllgr nd),ort the prop incur • r pur ss�)and nre„ 1p;t::TlPrbvtdet4drtitipovd r� 1 fr the rise hway'to tlhe project'l ocation.,i,*- bet JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 14 Part 6—Project Description 1 :'B ,fi surmm r�' a he overaj#aiproject. loo provide m re cle�l b # / Page 0f r� 'tl t o i rrdil ou Want o e f , - 1 , ¢ [ t � }gip C [ • B [� i 6 � i#4) a App 4 � r ,. x„ a� .,�. m n a: , .„ ,� ,ice , a :a - "� -���}`' _„ 'a ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential CI' Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational Ej Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement s e , 1g ,- x� 1. _' � ti sJ xV . yea(��. - iG, <ax. ,;fie `ll - ; ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier El. Marina/ Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ID Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: Page 5 of 14 JARPA Revision 2012.1 7', ion irk = II - `'� om.": = u a_ 9 r '� - li a q,111,,�P- 0 i:r' ®ry,l ®i, o'� { tQ E r 1 tea' t$110"e - ter ent A,401 ;"lnc1 °� R " P,OStrJctOp == ; �` =n; it - 7 ,�I u _ c 4 ii 1110411:1,..7. Oil ,r" s� Y( ? e I t t @ ,i a I Fj i �o' i1 it - hfi t i �'l - %h I :_ :, j - 't O i, I , .I y ' _ ,_ i I"s� (li,'`;' r i� i� E , 9 1��; I rti � fl 0 i§Ynt0,'�' M 1 "r 10#12.4 F,ale k 1I1.-r" •.� t (t , .'*.0-i ca ad ' _ �� y �_ lili±�r'• i� - �i y Ei�i S A. is°'+t. ,p ,,, 5 4i,, r ,,A r 1 if-- - dlli itl U , I„irk arl: `I` Iti e 4 sr "dR III cam, .:,..i�, ,1 7, 1i � t,, ,plF� u� (r �l�,.,=911ul Ih t mo'l z�llo I0P �_�� I g,' ' ,_ . # / Pageof .L$ t �Y F..W u 3 .g.._, l ' i p 0' 9 g - O t d gII "II G, t 6f hat ar an � ed � �ft pr � - dot 4 r1ue ) r l . � i , 3 i i A � l i , ' `,l k� t , ! ` i h �1 I I t x tfi p� w .d �. , i o espil &D i_sth OOH t zd - ea :ear ” t, ' f n, - In a i II y r DINEINCI: g „ . = : t r -di w r e t l i - . ea Start date: End date: ❑ See JARPA Attachment D _.: (I, 1,. - a - ^ _ ,• c rid al'f nt 'h C :,6gr � � alb l e* i etUd � bor,3,m �e rel tall etef' ! _ i��ry G P eb4 ��� 4 v ro a� h .. i • . ismiP_ o M.i tr m a m�stir ,g hl `N s r 1 r n 6h. tl p k . » teo e federal funding? -$, • ,,,d�.-''s�' y, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. D tt o�i e en de ned o avid and t im a adverre"impaetsto,w � ,H. el ❑ Not applicable 7'b. i t he project i ct w tlana _ 4 ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 6 of 14 w L'' �,il W 1, et tct ±yd buffets? ->- �t '''''''''''''''''''''D''' v. _ s.LLB�.. ..., r r 1► Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know In N�ly t Arad dr neap+ ' port t Qri prepared? i) t k� :i i ., ' tibia' t o, 1=j,§' „ a m, a s , eets VFti I F t�t6�:JPk A pac k�t t q r= L Y f 1 Iq; ry's d "i ❑Yes ❑ No -E i�r ( t, 1, �w ,1 1 p } �� p e 1 �em h1 "` r ��t� o • tf r: *subm t nret d rates f t�and figs lh ttfe to P 1 p ukage . ., h" ,' .. , ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know ul �: Have prep h �� Igrt p(an tit��rtsat �r arty ad erse t Hands? �.r i, 1 I h,9 r �„,gyp F 11 ( r d ...01' ' -All y I i 1 1 I r I(�y,� al � '`? k' (r41 � � a' 'e' �t th ; l Ir 0 ;.® iii+ fitpr'F: 1 III " i Po�l'a i d� },6 I ,i 1 Ip l _i I drl'1 i ,�� 'Sa ' 1 P 161 h 15 ,� II", 1 1 Nfi } Qr tii/e I -E7G I, t l tal -n �. r�t� r " ('q _ r` .z. ❑Yes ❑ No El Not applicable m�=t E C.: r9 w G�p h q 1 e q ilia ,F e ri v" � l 10 t p r r 1) � a. �1 1 S y 1 l "g T4 F "1 k „� 1 8. « ti , ± i , l " r Ijl I' -� £® i - 4 1 g it d w - � , lh It i d I � 7 1 wy n 411 ? Ik:` 0 a_ F .J,�ilq p ;�, #,-9 r . r r .1 isi , r 'T.011615111111*IU 1 1Tr'1� "" 1 1 " -0r _ ( 1� 1 It $ 'fit}I(, 1 11 ETC�x 'Ih rye '� �1 n 'r r t f r i a n t re parr it t t,art - �� _ ffi ti t1 t I po r f you a ''�< 1 • ,--r�plag a th'la �a k �1 7 _ �ir4a �r 2 1ai3011ek•1Y0Itl ) trl% �fwr • t ;l t •« , xh NItQ �q at 1 a n, �..af x... ,. F1`xr ", ,.,,. i 'a IYIL�1r.r.; �0`i �� '=„1 -'r�( .. �s ? IC Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. a Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishmenURehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 14 71, For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material,the amount in cubic yards that will be used andcihow,and where it will be Oaced into the wetland. ,[liefpi Fc r a texcavattng act activities identified i 711 desc be he ex cave on method, typo and am ;, t ma in et yards you will move, artd wheret material jll bye imposed, t a " Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [hem ❑ Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) r . : t 'HMO � a scrbe ow project t i ne toavoid and irnioev.., erse itrtpact :to the aquatic environme ❑ Not applicable to. Witt your project impact aa`waterbody or the area around terbody? theip[' ❑Yes ❑ No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 14 5r4 I I , 4 Y �1 ! 8 ter you pprepared a f r ",,„��to dci pens a fs r tt prc� t avers np is 9 noni t!at d Yes„�su n t then t A P cge, sd a YMr B'd "�' o m If lotepptl •Il ��;!I4 p r l�+wwk mitiq ti n plan should nc b r 3ked rti ` ` r ❑Yes El No ❑ Not applicable ', 6‘.dj / .�m "i � I� I m : o il” nI .” pf , g ' o hs : I w . p J f W ' d T ,_ 6•%r a ,, ��pyy gia n [3 @ �J p �1 t t i � � a y �� =u = , c = i G( h � k )r ' t mpnj : bo, 'a _ - s V `* oil ' r g g, ( F t i '9 ekt' L r a ; l � iI ; te p n t p �{ N I� 4IiI uii "lUel ;kuF 0I Ps �� u s' n u 8e' /'d. i4 pact � � , • �4f� i 4 .*., M r �sui'� -r i�G 414 i ` * t �,■Activity(clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 of impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody 11f no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. a Indicate the dais months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable f=or 9 s i it es-tde 'il" �1-" b � ie �Uirce and u ' o fiui£r testa H a .cl bi arils ,: i x.,, (I `17 ,^ ill 19 'kt� t With use, ark' ; e06il,it �i be pte�into the a erh» r { ' �M � � 4... '; IPI14�IIPn. �, �' ��-,� (� Ir * �,.' a { �.�I" §i rw�7u -`',X � t � a. J 4$j ua. . . �U EIT31 wu $�'xd, t Page 9 of 14 JARPA Revision 2012.1 8g. .0170 .e pavatjng or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, material you will rer tove,,end er the m.eteria will bef disposedtvhit Pa-676—i Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. `�I "' ( ` ' a is ti 4 g f y worked; it any.go'�rnm oie Y I t !tect,,ti6 't i bel >j H' � ems'- yy r� ( ) ( ) a� d pr w rbodies id t 1 a h s .A . i � I � I N Iii � fi r 5 � 1 r 9 �k. + 1 f Ib I I se „pshir €n D00,0 M Af polp,,WsWa'te1 - ladty A$ tools 4 tD „P."- xyaEi - II I�'' €/a b an ❑ Yes ❑ No ° at U. eiyl gical Suf--vey'H ratogi aJ nitC t o(r 1 the prt eot in` `F 1 1 t it t :ii f 6.eb . ovS. ui rl t 6d i. f 'pchelp ldennify t" i tug. ) rce veo Area lumber CIA# to • 'fit. 7 h • Q')Its'h t$` r' '+ a.aovfsa i si lmc a' inaAaJ9a.t1A! 4 t'inf the ,, �. .4 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 14 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. ❑Yes El No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what iNgcghorelitie , environment designation? [help] • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: http:I/www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/seta/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic El Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://wwwdnr via.gov/BusinessPermirsrTopics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertyping.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. El Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial El Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If No,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [help] • If Yes,please describe below. ❑ Yes ❑ No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [hem 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 14 91. Name each a c6a ,�; s ,ur> er the federal EndanRgred Species A�ihat°ocport in the vicinity f th oj� area,or mitt go*ff � � y the proposed work_ [h&lp L. i rpp of a'�8 , ,n' �,' ,.6 � r rt 0 fl i�'q , -�� � . Na „i r at a the W hln�n C} SS € shm� d �r11C[• -� no h�bt tar 4;4. " 'I' fit, , .a a a� ay the ei w r t 4, I rr t 'it 4 Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help( ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. Cpt pli p ,i t e r„,rtwronmentaFPolcy A ( EPA) (Check thatat ty) 11i#Jol sr e. �r . re*Info �gebiut�E to w� u .�c�� �rp�r� t�� ese�e resewt r ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ❑A SEPA determination is pending with (lead agency). The expected decision date is • ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.) [help] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 14 ����t'p € d ,�,,,�' a;i sl tii r` `f•I ,Inhij (Ii� i�i �!�6i °� :�s� irk �iN C *�r0 . i ,4444:0,4 P17 ;.;did Oi 7 'aa s -,p o fl ride iii �'N'= er g �I'h'Ij((:I ` ha a - } :a . Y mAk of ,a,� �.�". i 0 C 1 11 i 1 ii S' 1 pu§ . ir Local Government Shoreline permits: -° ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Page !` i _ Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance +., s ��p�€Po,Ir r �. s, ,� .�` il �' I. ,� r��;5 �f�(N" �in�.,tu"."tii N `"' r -• ` 3 y .i2 '( e H�yIIil l;ijIdi'$ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for$150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# ) Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# ) ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ) ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# ) Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification ��.pvi ( � w„ qi i4i i i a��a it�N o i un 6' � � illil�l=����� �"'" ` i I� p a�@li Ilh'�io�Ilu i �i iz i - - }, � � . r �a ' y>�i oDE _ ( ' VERN ' '` �h��.! ud( ��f s i .. ii�ii ����'� te,. �d � ft«�ki � I i € z� `�a ra�u-� lu +C � i �=a �I] Y>�` .� s`s x �� ., v i 3� United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 14 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. ThtJAIRPA�. c kage includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [help] e = 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [help) fag@ I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 11 C. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). [help] Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev. 06-12 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 14 , r ®�c L � . JEFFERSON COUNTY 44, 0. .....41:::::ti � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 1S4r.INrs�, 360/379-4450 - 360/379-4451 Fax www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: • 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) G:PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINALdoc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. G:\PermitCenter*WFORMS###DRD FORMS SERA Environmental Checklist_FINALdoc Rev.4/14/2008 Page b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? � j� c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page ao.��.j� wig• 2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: G:\PermitCenter#k FORMS#p#\DRO FORMS\SERA Environmental Checklist_FINAL doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 1 n- : (9_,g 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. G:1PermitCenter\ FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page Page 8-,9- )8 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. G:\PermitCenterVWFORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAI.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page - c. Describe any structures on the site. '° M ociE d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: G:\PermitCenter'.# FORMS###1DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 10. Aesthetics avg a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page cvy 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. G\PermitCenter###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page /// 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT n / EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: G:\PermitCenterV$ FORMS#N#\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page pie t ai,rti TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. G:\PermitCenter###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page L r Jefferson County Code ,11,2&;..110 ..--- e0 , nary for the improvement of the habitat or passage = ""..'1`i '6;:f:, ` 9 r x . ' { dy t s Fh• v and appropriately designed and sited to accomplish (1) Defmution.The aquatic designation refers to the intended purpose. all water bodies, including marine waters, lakes, (b) The project has received hydraulic rivers, and streams,and their respective water coI- project approval by the Department of Fish and umns and underlying lands that are defined as Wildlife under Chapter 75.20 RCW. shorelines of the state. (c) The local government has determined (2) Policies. that the project is consistent with the local shore- (a) The aquatic environment should be man- line master program. The local government shall aged for appropriate use activities, allowing either make such determination in a timely manner and multiple use or single dominant use in areas of provide it by letter to the project proponent. unique conditions,while recognizing and ensuring (20) Hazardous Substance Remedial Actions. compatibility with adjacent upland shoreline des- The procedural requirements of Chapter 90.58 ignations. RCW shall not apply to a.project for which a con- (b) Abandoned structures within the aquatic sent decree, order or agreed order has been issued designation should be removed when they no under Chapter 70.105D RCW or to the Department longer serve their permitted use unless retaining of Ecology when it conducts a remedial action such structures will provide a net environmental under Chapter 70.105D RCW. The Department benefit, for example, artificial reef effect of con- shall, in consultation with the appropriate local crete anchors. government,assure that such projects comply with (c) All structures placed on the water's sur- the substantive requirements of Chapter 90.58 face should have as low a profile as possible to RCW, Chapter 173-26 WAC and this master pro- minimize visual intrusion. gram. [Ord. 11-00§5(3.402)] (d) Potential conflicts with adjacent uses such as commercial fishing,recreation,and naviga- Article IV.Shoreline Designations and tion should be considered in the review of proposed Project Classifications aquatic developments.Developments should not be permitted where they would materially interfere 18.25.100 Shoreline environmental with existing uses. designations. (e) Aquatic developments should not locate The shorelines of Jefferson County, including in areas where the ecological quality of the shore- the city of Port Townsend's shorelines,are intrin- line environment would be significantly degraded. sically different. They have been designated into (f) .Aquatic developments should be five categories to provide a uniform and equitable designed and located to ensure that they do not have basis to guide and evaluate development proposals a significant adverse impact on natural dynamic that take place among the different shoreline areas. processes of shoreline formation or change. These five shoreline designations are explained (g) Aquatic developments should make below and are graphically portrayed on the shore- minimal and appropriate use of approved pesti- line designation map (see JCC 18.25.710). The cider, herbicides, antibiotics, vaccines, growth upland shoreline designations (urban, suburban, stimulants, or other chemicals. Operators shall conservancy, and natural) include wetlands as receive prior review and approval for their use defined in this master program, extending to the from the appropriate federal and state agencies. extreme low tide level. In some instances, the (h) Only federal and state approved anti- upland may contain dual environmental designa- fouling agents should be used in aquatic develop- tions.These limited instances occur where the area ments. normally considered upland may accommodate (3) Performance Standards. more intense activity than the shoreline proper.The (a) Structures, equipment, and materials designation for all water bodies (aquatic)includes shall be removed as soon as practicable upon the all shorelines of the state as defined in this master cessation of a project's operation or a structure's program.There is an intentional overlapping of the useful life.Any structure that is damaged or breaks upland and aquatic designation in the intertidal away in the water shall be repaired or removed by zone.Projects encompassing the intertidal area will the permittee as soon as practicable. Permittees be reviewed for consistency with both designa- who anticipate a temporary interruption of the use tions. [Ord. 11-00§ 5(4.10)] of a facility or structure may be allowed to keep it in its permitted location provided they notify and receive written concurrence from the Jefferson 18-127 (Revised 10/01) ?` 18.25.120 1 Pac e 3D of &-ic County planning and building department. Any 825 s1 Cr structure not utilized for over one year shall be (1) Definition. An area with valuable natural, removed regardless of future anticipated use unless cultural, or historical resources or environmental prior permission has been granted by the Jefferson conditions that should be protected,conserved,and County planning and building department upon managed to the extent that a continual supply of showing of good cause. those resources such as soil, water, timber, fish, (b) Permittees for developments in the shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted aquatic designation shall be required to post a per- but are maintained. Also included are areas con- formance bond or other suitable guarantee to ensure mining sensitive environmental conditions that removal of all structures,equipment,and materials, may limit the potential for development or use, should the project cease operation.The county may including but not limited to steep slopes, flood- require security beyond that required by the state if prone areas, eroding bluffs, marshes, bogs, it is determined that state requirements are not ade- swamps, and accretion shore forms. Low density quate to secure removal of structures. residential and recreational uses are permitted pro- (c) Permittees shall be liable for all damages vided these activities do not significantly degrade to public and private property should their struc- or deplete resources and respect limiting environ- tures fail. The county may require liability insur- mental condition. ance beyond that required by the state if it is (2) Policy. To protect, conserve, and manage determined that state requirements are not adequate existing resources and valuable historical and cul- to cover damages. tural areas in order to ensure sustained resource (d) Aquatic developments shall not be stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions approved in narrow channels,shipping lanes, or in are not subject to inappropriate uses. [Ord. 11-00§ other areas where they are a significant hazard to 5(4.103)] navigation. (e) All structures that could interfere with 18.25.140 Suburban. navigation shall be marked in accordance with the (1) Definition. Areas where residential activity U.S.Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. may approach urban density, but usually where (f) The maximum level for noise generated densities permit space for small numbers of live- in the aquatic designation shall be 50 dBA at a dis- stock, gardens, or wood lots. These areas are tance of 100 feet. This standard shall not apply to served by individual or community water supplies, vessels that are underway. All feasible methods but generally are not linked with utilities from an shall be employed to minimize overwater noise urban center. Commercial activities to serve the generation. needs of the immediate area are considered an inte- (g) Structures placed in the aquatic designa- gral part of this designation. tion shall blend into the surroundings to the great- (2) Policy. To provide permanent residential est extent feasible utilizing appropriate color(s), and recreational areas outside of urban areas, so texture, nonreflective materials, and other design long as development of these areas provides ade- characteristics. [Ord. 11-00 § 5(4.101)] quate facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, open space, and the like without severe degrada- 18.25.120 Natural. tion to the lifestyle that was sought initially. [Ord. (1) Definition. A shoreline possessing unique 11-00§5(4.104)] or fragile features either natural or cultural,that are essentially unaltered from their natural state or rel- 18.25.150 Urban. atively intolerant of human use other than that for (1) Definition. The urban environment is an passive activities.Included are those areas contain- area of high intensity land use,including residen- ing hazardous or unique environmental conditions, tial, commercial, and industrial development. Ur- such as highly erosive bluffs, tidal marshes,. estu- ban shorelines should be designated for high aries,and active landslides. intensity use or multifamily residential develop- (2) Policy. Aquaculture developments and ment.The urban designation may also be applied to mechanized harvest practices involving substantial areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding substrate modification through dredging, trench- land use is urban and urban services are available. ing, digging, or adverse sedimentation should be (2) Policies. prohibited in wetlands and estuaries which are nat- (a) Development in urban areas should be ural environmental designations in this master pro- managed so it enhances and maintains the shore- gram. [Ord. 11-00 §5(4.102)] line for a variety of urban uses, with preference (Revised 10/01) 18-128 L_, Jefferson County Code Page 3,/ " -/318.25.200 ceed 35 feet as measured from mean higher high During application review,the basic element or water(MHHW). intent of a proposed development will guide in the (e) The redevelopment and revision of determination of the proposal's particular use existing wharves and piers may be permitted to activity.When a proposal contains two or more use serve water-dependent or water-related uses. activities within a shoreline designation, each Water enjoyment and non-water-oriented uses may activity may be reviewed independently and the be authorized as conditional uses on these struc- total project considered on the whole. tures,provided such uses are integrated elements to In the review of a shoreline permit, consider- an overall redevelopment plan meeting all of the ation will be given to the cumulative impact the following conditions: project may have with similar use activities. This (i) The redevelopment is to an existing, review is to ensure that the resulting total effect contributing structure within the Water Street Na- will not thwart the intent and policies of the partic- tional Historic District as recognized by the Na- ular shoreline environmental designation, nor tional Trust for Historic Preservation; result in substantial degradation of the shoreline (ii) The structure is recognized by appro- itself. [Ord. 11-00 §5(4.20)] priate historic preservation agencies as having local and state-wide historic significance; 18.25.180 Primary uses. (iii) The structure has an established his- (1) Definition. In general, those categories of tory of mixed uses, both water-oriented and non- uses that are deemed as being preferable with the water-oriented uses; definition and policy of a particular shoreline des- (iv) The redevelopment does not exceed ignation. the structure's historic,overwater footprint; (2) Criteria. Primary uses are presumed to be (v) Buildings and other structures lo- generally consistent with the policies and definition cated on the wharf or pier are approved by appro- of the shoreline designation where it is located. priate historic preservation agencies as being Projects will be reviewed for consistency with spe- compatible and reinforcing of the architectural in- cific goals and policies and must comply with the tegrity of the historic district; performance standards specified for the particular (vi) A significant element or component type of development being reviewed.[Ord. 11-00§ of the developed area is dedicated to water-depen- 5(4.201)] dent and water-related uses; (vii) At least one-third of the pile sup- 18.25.190 Secondary uses. ported structure including a perimeter walkway is (1) Definition.Those uses that are not automat- dedicated for public access and enjoyment of the ically deemed as being preferable within the scope shoreline. All public access provisions shall be of the definition or policy of a particular shoreline completed and available for public use upon com- environmental designation. pletion of the first component of the development; (2) Criteria. Applicants for shoreline substan- (viii) The redevelopment will not result tial development permits for secondary uses will in a reduction in the amount of physical public ac- have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: cess to and over the water as currently exists; (a) The proposal will not be contrary to the (ix) The city of Port Townsend shall be a general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, party to a binding agreement to guarantee that pub- nor shall it be contrary to the goals, policies, and lie access and enjoyment provisions are continu- performance standards of this master program. ously maintained. [Ord. 11-00 § 5(4.106)] (b) The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and 18.25.170 Project classifications. waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. Development proposals are categorized within (c) The proposed project will not cause each shoreline designation as primary, secondary, unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or conditional,or prohibited uses.This priority system other properties and will be compatible with other determines the proposals administrative require- permitted uses in the area.[Ord. 11-00§5(4.202)] ments and encourages activities that are compatible with each shoreline designation. In all cases, the 7. 3 f applicant shall have the burden of proof to show (1) Definition.Those uses that are deemed least consistency with the provisions of the Act and this preferable within the scope of the definition and master program. policies of a particular shoreline environmental designation. While not prohibited outright, these 18-131 (Revised 10/01) I 1-17-A/ 18.25.210 ` / _ uses are an exception to the general rule.A condi- m,. �� Page of ° /8. tional use permit is intended to allow for flexibility Unclassified uses are those uses which are not and the exercise of judgment in the application of classified in the foregoing definitions or in the uses regulations in a manner consistent with the policies listed in Article V of this chapter. Such uses shall of the Act and this master program.Requests for a be reviewed as a conditional use including the variance from the uses allowed within a shoreline applicant's additional burden to demonstrate that designation shall be evaluated as a conditional use extraordinary circumstances preclude reasonable subject to the criteria of this subsection, provided use of the property consistent with the provisions uses which are prohibited shall not be authorized. of the master program. Appeals from the adminis- A change of use from a permitted use to a condi- trator's decision may be made under the provisions tional use requires a conditional use permit. set forth in JCC 18.25.680 and 18.25.690. [Ord. (2) Criteria. Applicants for shoreline condi- 11-00§5(4.205)] tional use permits shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that they are in conformance with 18.25.230 Shorelines of state-wide significance. WAC 173-27-160, as amended, and all of the fol- (1) Definition. Shorelines of state-wide signifi- lowing: cance,with respect to Jefferson County and the city (a) The proposed use is consistent with the of Port Townsend,are identified as: policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the policies of the (a) Those lakes, whether natural, artificial, master program; or a combination thereof,with a surface acreage of (b) The proposed use will not interfere with 1,000 acres or more measured at the ordinary high the normal public use of public shorelines; water mark,including their associated wetlands. (c) The proposed use of the site and design (b) Those areas of Puget Sound and adjacent of the project is compatible with other permitted salt waters and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between uses within the area; the ordinary high water mark and the line of (d) The proposed use will cause no unrea- extreme low tide,which are Hood Canal from Tala sonable adverse effects to the shoreline environ- Point to Foulweather Bluff, south to the Mason- ment in which it is to be located;and Jefferson County line, including their associated (e) The public interest suffers no substantial wetlands. detrimental effect.In those limited instances where (c) Those areas of Puget Sound and the 1 a conditional use is proposed, consideration shall Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters, be given to the cumulative impact of additional re- north to the Canadian line and lying seaward from quests for similar actions in the area. the line of extreme low tide. Furthermore, the Shoreline Management Act (d) Those natural rivers or segments thereof requires that permits for variances and conditional downstream from a point where the mean annual uses must be submitted to the Washington State flow is measured at 1,000 cubic feet per second or Department of Ecology for final approval. more. In Jefferson County, these rivers, including In authorizing a conditional use permit, special their associated wetlands,are: conditions may be required by Jefferson County, (i) The Clearwater River from the con- the city of Port Townsend,or the Washington State fluence of Miller Creek within Section 27,Town- Department of Ecology to control or prevent ship 25 North,Range 12 West,WM,downstream, adverse effects of a project or to further the policies excluding federal lands,to the Quinault Indian Res- of the Shoreline Management Act and this master ervation within Section 29, Township 24 North, program. [Ord. 11-00 §5(4.203)] Range 10 West,WM. (ii) The Hoh River from the Olympic Na- 18.25.210 Prohibited uses. tional Park boundary within Section 29,Township Some developments and uses by their nature are 27 North,Range 10 West,WM,downstream to the not consistent with the definition,policies,or intent Hoh Indian Reservation within Section 20,Town- of certain shoreline environmental designations. ship 26 North,Range 13 West,WM. For the purpose of this program,these uses are not (iii) The Quinault River from the east considered appropriate or applicable, therefore, section line of Section 33, Township 24 North, they are not allowed. Uses that are prohibited Range 8 West,WM,downstream to the Hoh Indian within a shoreline environment may not otherwise Reservation within Section 20,Township 27 North, be permitted without first amending the master Range 13 West,WM. program to allow said use. [Ord. 11-00§5(4.204)] (Revised 10/01) 18-132 Jefferson County Code Page 33 of g j 18.25.430 (1) Sewage disposal systems shall not be (b) All feasible means shall be employed to locat-• within the floodplain of marine and fresh ensure that data,structures,and sites having histor- water e e•'es unless in compliance with the Jeffer- al, scientific, educational, or archaeological sig- son C. ty floodplain management ordinance. in cance are extracted, preserved, or /used in a ( ) Residential structures shall not exceed m. , er commensurate with their impo, . ce. 35 feet i, height. [Ord. 11-00 §5(5.1602 (c) The establishment, restora 'on, or revi- tali ..•on of historical, archaeologi : , scientific, 18.25.420 Scientific and educational f• ilities. or edu ational facilities shall be d 4 ne in such a (1) Defi 'tion.Those sites,structures or facili- manner that would cause minimal disturbance to ties that pro 'de unique insight into our natural or adjacent .roperties as well as na, • features of cultural heri :ge. the shore e. [Ord. 11-00§5(5.1 0)] (2) Polici. . (a) Je rson County and the 'ty of Port 18.25.430 hore defense wor Townsend sh o uld consult with the Washington (1) Def I'tion. Structures o modifications for State Office of chaeology and His .ric Preserva- the purpose if retarding short erosion from wave tion and profes.ional consultants o review pro- or current ac►'on, protecting o annels and harbors posed project art. for potential v, cable data and from wave ac on,encouragi I g deposition of beach to establish proce•ures for salva a g that data. materials, pre -nting stre. r bank overflow and (b) Where i ossible, sites .hould be perma- retaining uplan a .They ma, consist of bulkheads, nently preserved fo scientific s a dy and public ob- seawalls,dikes, -vetments,breakwaters,jetties,or servation.In areas .i own to co tain archaeological gabions.Defense orks ar commonly constructed data,special conditi•I s shoul a be attached to sub- from quarry rock 'p-rap treated wood,concrete, stantial development .-rmits o provide for site in- steel,and sand and Jaye. spections and an evalu.tion •f an archaeologist to (2) Prohibited U -s . i d Activities. ensure that archaeolog al data is properly sal- (a) Shore defe.s: works on spits, hooks, vaged. bars,barrier beaches,o .imilar accretion terminals (c) Developers should notify Jefferson or accretion shore form. County or the city of Po- ` ownsend, as the case (3) Policies. may be,if any possible - eh:eological data is un- (a) Bulkheads . • seawalls should be covered during excava'ins • the shoreline area. located and construct-a in ch a manner that will (d) Jefferson C. qty . • the city of Port not result in adverse e ects o: nearby beaches and Townsend should wor, toward -nding integrity to will minimize alterati ens of th. natural shoreline. the Natural Historic ' eservation Act of 1966 and (b) Shore clef:nse wo should be con- the Washington Stag Parks and -creation Com- structed in such a w.y that wouli minimize dam- mission Act (Chap -r 43.51 RC '1 and provide age to fish and sh:llfish habita • Open poling wherever possible for the protection, -habilitation, construction is prefi able in lieu of .e solid type. restoration, and r: onstruction of a .tricts, sites, (c) The effe• of a proposed .ulkhead on buildings, struc es, and objects Si t a .cant in public access to pu alicly owned shore . es should American, Was I 1 gton State, or 1. ; history, be considered. architecture,arc'aeology,or culture. (d) Shore di ense works should be esigned (e) Exca ation of Indian artifacts shall be to blend with the .urroundings and not to ,'stract conducted in ompliance with the W. 'I gton from the aestheti qualities of the shorelines State Archae a logical Sites and Resourc:s Act (e) The co struction of bulkheads sho d be (Chapter 27.-3 RCW). permitted only w ere they provide protection t•up- (f) E-cavation activities shall be cond cted land areas or fac 'ties,not for the indirect purp'se in compli. ce with the applicable policies • d of creating lane by filling behind the bulkh-••. standards of this master program. Landfill opera ens should satisfy related perfo (3) Pe ormance Standards. mance standar. . (a No development or substantial develo. (f) Floaai g breakwaters are preferred to ment s . be undertaken with regard to a site or solid landfill t a es in order to maintain sand move- structu e that has probable historical,scientific, or ment and fis abitats. archai ological significance until an evaluation of (g) So 'd breakwaters should be constructed the s' e or structure has been made by an authority only where design modifications can eliminate jud:-d competent in such matters by Jefferson potentially detrimental effects on the movement of Co;. ty or the city of Port Townsend. sand and circulation of water. 18-153 (Revised 10/01) L T wi 18.25.440 # /_ ,. , Page 3 ..w_ (h) The restriction of the public use of the wise divert th- •' ection of s -am flow,unless said water surf. - as a result of breakwater construction works have been .rofes 'onally engineered and must be r:cognized and must be considered in analyzed to ensure „- diversion will not cause granting sh4reline permits for their construction. cross-stream or do , s -. impacts nor adversely (i) e effect proposed jetties or groins have alter the charac -ristic of ,,e river or stream. [Ord. on sand mo -ment must be considered.Provisions 11-00§ 5(5 :0)] should be . e to compensate for the adverse effects of the .tructures either by artificially trans- 18.25. .0 Transportation facilities. porting sand t• the downdrift side on an inlet with (1) P-fmition. Passageways for motorized ve- jetties, or by . icially feeding the beaches in the hicks or trains, including but not limited to such case of groins. devices as bridges, trestles,ramps,or culverts. (j) Special attention should be ;,•ven to the (2) Policies. effect these structo es will have on • dlife propa- (a) Whenever feasible, major highways, gation and movem. t,and to the effe these struc- freeways, and railroads should be located away tures will have on th- aesthetic quali' of the shore- from shorelands, except in port and heavy indus- line. - trial areas, so shore roads my be reserved for slow (k) Rip-rappin_ and other .: stabilization moving recreational or residential traffic. measures should be a ated, d: igned, and con- (b) Roads located in wetland areas should structed to avoid the nee.d for c . elization and to be designed and maintained to prevent erosion and protect the natural chara ter o' the stream. to permit a natural movement of ground water. (I) Where flood pr I tec.on measures such as (c) All debris, overburden, and other waste dikes are planned,they sh• d be placed landward materials from construction should be disposed in of the stream, including :.sociated swamps and such a way to prevent their entry by erosion from marshes and other wed. 1'.,s directly interrelated drainage,high water,or other means into any water and interdependent with e.tream proper. body. (m) Flood protecti.n easures that result in (d) Road locations should be planned to fit channelization should .: avoed. the topography so alterations of natural conditions (4) Performance St. dards.\ will be minimized. (a) Shore defense works shall be designed (e) Scenic corridors with public roadways and constructed in a m. ' erthat;auses an absolute should have provisions for safe pedestrian and minimum of interru I 'on to na urally occurring other nonmotorized travel.Also,provisions should shoreline processes. be made for sufficient view points,rest areas, and (b) Shore def:nse works s all be designed picnic areas in public shorelines. and constructed to inimize inte ption of fish (f) Extensive loops or spurs of old highways movements as well : marine and ,dlife habitats. with high aesthetic quality should be kept in ser- (c) Shore d: ense works sh.' not be used vice as pleasure by-pass routes, especially where for the indirect p i,.•se of creating 1.,•dfills,unless main highways paralleling the old highway must such landfill is s a-cifically permitte a in compli- carry large traffic volumes of high speed. ance with landfi performance stall,'ards of this (g) Since land use and transportation facili- master program. ties are so highly interrelated, the plans for each (d) Shore defense works shall a e designed should be coordinated. and constructe• to harmonize insofar as I racticable (h) Waterway crossings should be designed with the aesth- 'c characteristics of the ea where and constructed to maintain normal geohydraulic they are locate... processes, as well as to minimize interruption of (e) Sh•,e defense works such as a' es shall floodwater flow. be located 1. dward of the stream and as'ociated (i) Transportation facilities should assure swamps,bac. aters,marshes,floodway an,, other the continued and unobstructed movement of sedi- wetlands d' -ctly interrelated and interde•: dent ments. with the str:am proper. (j) The number of waterway crossings (f) S bstantial development permit app a- should be minimized. tions shall provide competent technical eviden.e (3) Performance Standards. that the proposed shore defense structure will per (a) When feasible,major highways and rail- form as designed. roads shall be located away from the shoreline. (g) Shore defense works along rivers and (b) Whenever possible, roads shall be lo- streams shall not include groins or jetties or other- cated on natural benches,ridge tops,or other areas (Revised 10/01) 18-154 4 �,,,.o!' S __. �". Jefferson County Code # ../-- - 18.25.450 Page 3S f X213 where alteration of natural features such as soils (s) All roads and drainage systems shall be will be minimal. maintained to prevent erosion and/or water quality (c) Roads and railroads shall be located to degradation. provide buffer areas along streams and other shore- (t) Mechanical apparatus,rather than chem- lines. icals,shall be used for brush clearing maintenance (d) Roads shall be located to avoid steep, wherever practicable. narrow canyons, slide areas, slumps, swamps, (u) Herbicides used for maintenance along marshes,wet meadows,and the like and shall meet roads and drainage systems shall follow the perfor- the provisions of JCC 18.25.350,Landfills. mance standard outlined under JCC 18.25.330(6), (e) Unnecessary duplication of roads shall chemical application. be avoided by making use of existing roads where (v) Road routes shall make provisions for practicable. pedestrian,equestrian,bicycle,and other modes of (f) Road drainage shall be designed to con- travel whenever feasible. trol the dispersal of surface runoff from roads and (w) In compliance with RCW 36.87.130 exposed soils in order to minimize turbid water and 35.79.030, neither Jefferson County nor the from draining into waterways. city of Port Townsend shall vacate a road or part (g) Earthworks shall be designed to provide thereof that abuts on a body of salt or fresh water, waste and borrow areas that will produce a mini- unless the purpose of the vacation is to enable any mum of erosion, water turbidity, and aesthetic public authority to acquire the vacated property for damage. port purposes,boat moorage or launching sites, or (h) Cut and fill slopes shall be designed at for park, view point, recreational, educational, or the normal angle of repose or less. other public purposes, or unless the property is (i) Cut and fill slopes shall be protected zoned for industrial purposes. Further, such vaca- from erosion by mulching, seeding, use of head- tion shall not be accomplished for any purpose that walls,or other suitable means. is not consistent with this master program,and then (j) Roads and waterway crossings shall not only when all appropriate federal, state, and local be wider than to accommodate the anticipated use. permits have been issued for the intended use. (k) Waterway crossings shall be designed so (x) Transportation facilities in floodways the integrity of the naturally occurring geohydrau- shall be designed to minimize floodwater diversion lic process is maintained. or obstruction to floodwater flow. [Ord. 11-00 § (1) Waterway crossings shall be designed to 5(5.190)] provide minimal disturbance to banks. (m) Culverts and similar devices shall be 18.25.450 Utilities. designed with regard to 100-year flood storm fre- (1) Definition. Services or facilities that pro- quencies. duce, transmit, carry, store,process, or dispose of (n) Bridges and similar devices shall be electric power, gas, water, sewage, communica- designed with regard to 100-year flood frequen- tions,oil, and the like. cies. (2) Policies. (o) Roads,bridges,culverts, and similar de- (a) Whenever utilities must be placed in a vices shall afford maximum protection for fisheries shoreline area,the location should be chosen to not resources. obstruct or destroy scenic views. Wherever feasi- (p) Excess material shall be deposited in sta- ble, these facilities should be placed underground ble locations and not into stream corridors where or designed to do minimal damage to the aesthetic such materials degrade water quality, impede qualities of the shoreline area. floodwaters, or alter naturally occurring geohy- (b) To an extent feasible, Jefferson County draulic processes. and the city of Port Townsend should incorporate (q) No machinery shall operate within a major utility corridors on shorelines into their pro- stream bed except in compliance with a hydraulics grams and plans for public access to and along wa- permit issued by the Washington State Department ter bodies. of Fisheries and Department of Game. (c) Utilities should be located to meet the (r) All material associated with road con- needs of future populations in areas planned to ac- struction that is potentially unstable or erodible commodate this growth. shall be stabilized by compacting,seeding,mulch- (d) Upon completion of installation and ing,or other suitable means. maintenance projects of shorelines, banks should be restored to preproject configuration, replanted 18-155 (Revised 10/01) 18.25.460 - j 3 6 8 Pad with native species, and be provided with mainte- 18.25.470 Program administration. nance care until the newly planted vegetation is es- The Jefferson County planning and building tablished. departme t is hereby vested with general overall (3) Performance Standards. administra ion of the Shoreline Management Act (a) Utilities shall be installed adjacent to or and this m.h.ter program with respect to Jefferson within existing utility or circulation easements or County and ,e city of Port Townsend.For p,.jects rights-of-way whenever feasible. originating w ' the city of Port Towns:nd, the (b) Utilities shall be installed underground planning dep. • ent shall perform its :uties in whenever feasible. conjunction wi the Port Townsend p .lic works (c) Utilities shall be designed and installed department and ayor's office. The esponsibili- to meet future needs when possible. ties and duties of e planning and b lding depart- (d) When feasible, utility corridors shall ment include the fo'lowing: serve multiple uses such as shoreline access or rec- (1) Prepare and e such form• it deems essen- reational trails or pathways. tial for administrative purposes. uch forms shall (e) Utilities installed in the water,beach, or be consistent with W•C 173-2 -110. upon tidal areas shall assure that water quality and (2) Advise and ass.t app -cants for shoreline marine life will not suffer degradation. permits of administrati req,irements and review (f) Installation of utilities shall assure the criteria of the Shoreline . agement Act and this prevention of siltation or beach erosion. master program. " (g) Upon completion of installation or (3) Insofar as possible -nsure that all shoreline maintenance projects, banks shall be restored to a permit applications are • o.-r and complete prior suitable configuration and stability,replanted with to review. native species,and provided with maintenance care (4) Ensure that all :. ' 'strative requirements until the newly planted vegetation is established. designed by the Sho'line I anagement Act and (h) Utility discharges and outfalls shall be this master program . e acco+i plished in process- located, designed, constructed, and operated so ing shoreline permit .pplicati e . degradation to water quality,marine life,and gen- (5) Insofar as .►,ssible, ens i e that all foresee- eral shoreline ecosystems is kept to an absolute able and pertinent •ata, corresp•ndence, and testi- minimum. mony regarding permit appli'ations has been (i) Both during and after installation,utili- considered and . e in order prior to review. ties shall assure that geohydraulic shore processes (6) Present .ermit applicatio. for substantial and marine life are basically maintained in their development, s"condary and con."tional uses and natural condition. variance requ-.ts together with an findings,eval- (j) Utilities located in floodprone areas shall uations,and r:commendations to the hearing exam- be provided with adequate flood protection and iner. shall not be installed to increase flood hazard or (7) Prese t permit applications ogether with other damage to life or property. findings,e uations,and recommen,ations to the (k) Flammable or toxic materials shall not board of c. ty commissioners or ci council. be stored in areas subject to flooding. (8) Re'iew all proper and comple - shoreline (1) Utilities shall not be installed in areas permit a..lications for primary uses. subject to geological hazards,unless it can clearly (9) • "view any and all information,t.stimony, be demonstrated that such hazards can be over- or cone.pondence from interested persons groups, come. [Ord. 11-00 § 5(5.200)[ or age.cies with respect to shoreline permr appli- cation for primary uses. Article VI.Administratio s (11 Make findings and evaluations and RI ere- after formulate and transmit recommendation. to 18.25.460 System establishe• the earing examiner or city council that permits e e tl.ere is hereby establis. • by this master pro- : . .ted or denied for primary uses with respect t gram . - .dministrative : stem designed to assign c...pliance with the Shoreline Management Act responsib' i: for 'ew of substantial develop- . d this master program. ment permits, t. • - cribe an orderly process by (11) Condition any permit recommended for which tore 't • all pe i . .plications,and gener- :pproval associated with subsection (10) of this ally to en • e that all person oming within the ,.-ction in order to prevent undesirable effects of jurisdic '.n of this master program treated in a e proposed use, as well as bringing about con- fair . . equitable manner. [Ord. 11-00 • - 6)] (Revised 10/01) 18-156 a „� � Hate received , trs • US Army Corps i WASHINGTON STATE sas ;g ` � Joint Aquatic Resources Permit gerlec � ' "h Application (JARPA) Form1,2 FXl �"" a` '�., USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. € A_ �- ^ � 1 51 tittla Page 31 of i8 Part 1—Project Identification w nip h _° q. i . 3`' '� �, „� h i'". .3 4!- a f t ,i - - Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] J t= i Ir p„ J _MM i a .tea..,. `"lf. dhm, o da a3 j ^. su .a tar a .o ssa.mv .3.. , at ..,,n , .j aa;oag= ..^N dg mm 9i:A III k+ i ail°_ r . L 4a ,li t p u C 11 It - i� lle�t�t 14dP P f , �� r�' `"S��� �Y I -��.- '�a ( - �= IM1-z Izpa Il �`1�" �'_ � \ ) ( ) ( / Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil /orks/Regulatory/PermitGuidebook/EndangeredSpecies.aspx. • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/iarpa iarpa form/9984/iarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or helpaora.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 14 Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Page 35 gib Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [hem j T t I . x :Auk' 4 7 r ." *�r 7 re=t_o r ImoR,BoxFkrz u -iL is l i . If" k . i l" .x , ,s a,= _ rte, 4r �° '' .',�� • ,e "e_� — _ * oa .max //- r. ( .I' I' t•`ti ,I ', fi'I :_ '4 -. .. <<..;-% ( ) ( ) Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. Iheipi ❑ Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) [' There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4 rga iza ion (I apph blef 4c. Adc ress(Street or' Box ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 14 Part 5-Project Location(s) p--,re 3 9 of Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. •mete he'type of : er hip f the,s ec C li tr►ltlipl p ailrailliantlitethilarpaHltingror ❑ Private ❑ Federal ❑ Publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) —managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) r . I i i � r ,� �,�,(m h Y I s�'"I� d71�o� , �+ f, � I Y' G _, � i i ,r.7 �rl p 1'�- M b.,•� tAddress( r -e Brix.If t .A ZtsI `�. # s ,prove®°ji �II� ® I`� a r p I p- = F °' "� � Irv,_ .Zip if e t `' u a �r l sal h1(� � t i s N :• at®' _ • � iEe�' of ���' � y w64 �� � - � '1 m r ��r£aji I a I� II t4 ` " a - �,�Irj "` '-r U IIKr �� `I,d i �' 1 '<I ��_ �) ' I �"€- � I - r J �•f _ � - I � �l �i�B�•II Ide tie for l ns t ll l e« lase w u r,r 11 P ,I M s it z Z a ±t de;theTlatitude' !l'��'longit t'de f t - p )e to e r o I o m „a ir --, - i ,I Iii l� °�'� 'I MI' i ;3t I _r 9 �' t � I ,t � �' � �, . t i r_ i y ali,� r" +ii -�I n;,r Y r A i ' ample:47 03922 N Cs 4 ;t ai sue,�. , *Rtpd}"�,w �i Ir6 ;` r 'G �. �' ' w +'rI d� (� �ti gym. I, g. List the tax 1 r�f r the I (ec t th, '- r Y tr t r K' j - 4 - i ► Thy i. •Fray a se ' of ce r is r. ation ig " U ry v �� ;Contact i iforrrtati fo irting pr�perty ; t f s (tf foil r ee more e� A tt chs nt xt�l l Native` jai Address ax Par el (if>kn I I# mt .z^c.4 ..,. Iv 1 ?;"`1f la a .,t o LJ In JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 14 L Page 0 5j List 1 wq : or$cIJapkt to the proJ44ocat h: "- u " """(othr 1 otrivett or"— 'op ,L,',;i',L4,w,,,Ni77.volakwkdrogilimmimm*z-hdmUDAm%;003gWnAMMOmmummimag:',MAMOAMSUIdom-aCnalummmmwmqao0.pw,,,,, amnaAmmL'aimdeas mir,,tnMrgi4 iiieliPITWIZOifilWILIPIPPM011111F'D:AlPilNIPti!ii4.010FAM!,14.412101111aR411131.1ggMilliPCINE201111P1 *flagRIVMMEXR - 2 ' ,ntrucCrtte'wwpa rectIAttt gi 1110al 0 Yes 0 No 0 Don't know li41ii::;i1,07401:„1:11:11!1,..11111111;r1101i,1111?.#1, hilet641‘;411'101177111H,,,,,7sliont:16i14014119tillEs71,h4li::0ertylin:14iErtelil!'011111matilltilli'i:ili!,',11trilill!.01-111111:1:110111011111111111111 flaqlg-i,-,o'itt'ianufio':NFa'RnetEtwMttiTOV:::T5t,06tijpa12.tgagoimillginlriagtfggmtmigbgimtnlNftxttglmaowggiggausippfmlp !if Jui4moct-,.: 10 tic:,:u4lototwf,,,..: zoirtavymx:;:liloA:11:11,01:dtiontramomotimmtplisopol:smompotmoramolostil,"0111,11,cooma:111101 egatadaintAtritN*OFTWIPLI,M1V.WeBT4F'0,01i1131111,,,l':',TMERUMAUDRZ' 'NN:qd,,',,,,,,,,..;..ts,,dOgS':Fj:VMrNEqraEHPTadilejdraSNPdNKVNMVMStrhk'deDWMRAVMIEHdqg:VhVNWWMNNAIVVSR 1#9palgRanglialW2Pgffain10111511PMF00;711t;',UVAPPMNWONAINWIAMMINEAP6IMINMVAMMAPMAKMPUIPAMOMNIWRIMRWOOPIONIMMWEIRaN1451 "nvPeOOriOO:ghos*thqo. ::,,:::::,o4rp!oOertieo:ar000r:rentPsrooecLE:oet:Df::::i:.:::RmiommumHbr:tip::::Eo:z::,!::oqm:oHsgs,4,ioq.oli:::::::I:i,::JzyzozQmmorofsmsgtmH ahltiliN::1:'IE,11,6 agiNgleAlbagniNg ;i4:0111W1 ,„ ,„„,„;,, wwlmpAH:It.,',E:':)-)PgwY•Oriatwg,,' IffM9I4913POARCA01WW!!Ial!WHP-MM.9WV11„,„ApyffrOMorskiz 73-11110J3141,1id; 51Mar:40VpeSdir;;,(1,! IrooTionottotolhoolosest htqhwaTtath*orojeolv::.. *tonploodattachi!latmapi:: ::ws:,:::::4mtool JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 14 Part 6—Project Description a tl e� e e il n b.. te a 5,`sure' mrizetheou pprofe 'u sc p rt rr Pay y / of al8 # Ott lop eofth .ia ® , ty `r' 01 fter� r t=, � á ; i,i� (alk, ;',#,=',-- _, , _ s --� ..... E, e -. a x ` �'. ;5rr E:. ���, i�. ;t t� a r� 1pira��,�. xP„ �� �. "" z �- nr '� F F"` �� '' � r'y�°-=.. `� �---,m� ,i H " 'r s p a r 3- Iu� .,. --i �� ���' ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation El Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement ❑Aquaculture El Culvert ❑ Float El Retaining Wall El Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir El Floating Home (upland) El Boat House El Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch El Ditch El Land Clearing ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat Lift Measurement Device El Dock/ Pier El Marina/ Moorage El Bridge ❑ Stairs g El Dredging ❑ Mining El Bulkhead ❑ Fence El Stormwater facility ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Buoy El Swimming Pool y ❑ Ferry Terminal El Piling/Dolphin ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Utility Line ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: Page 5 of 14 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page Aid, limmv ) . t{i : Iu = 1 Ct ia�l�4 - 1 r ° _ € _p . SI1 soh, ,r ".211.11,414 i 1, t sl ,`: { li d , 1 I g 1 _ I1 .041W1/40111 r �1 R a � 1 — fit 4 y , 00, 1 � i z 40,140 4� t A+ » i ,y U t m,{ � „? , ra -' 1 ,, I l� ' 6 n( P a._ it1 l 1 xg r 1 Mt v 14: ,. ,pk " �„P S 1 : . , '7„: g rP F . P _r c. �r ,'I iri s IN i ti{ t a { =_ S i a • fand e d4trs c p ', wlatraw st'ucti ri? 11 t ,' �e 'I'`1. i FaR `�.ar€ ��11”' I 1 a1 � a I � 1 1 1 E i 1 4' ' III ' ��' I$'I`� -� � . I{ rta• {� Iif a d e �O„ $ i RPA� �3 fb sb e,_ , `” 1 {yam p1 rt I)1 '1 1 a n �' ul 1 ,I IP s� 1 , 6 �= dI Y. f t J. J; ` oi " i . .... g i"lam . ,. a of t 11 i i o IFIi 9 6„ C r 11 a P Start date: End date: [' See JARPA Attachment D 6g.m t rr t* I cl tin al (labor + in � R .c pr. . g N =Mn a r ;,SOWSW L" ."ulk,- a mfir j'" .-K ok .a' , P P 9 L n ,.. �_ - • I�CiI t roj � ?ac a tirt, d. e ` .(n ) ` : r � ' ,;� � `.� .Ili. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know D4 7d end elf t� r � p t been re aced" ,, Pa e ' u . I. ,report,i €$ data sheets= th the 'J P ag ❑ Yes ❑ No I I 19I� I i�' I1 II I 14 II I , I 19 fie. the - I ' -be r� �i e� �rtga�l I s a Washi h t s16�a �g o a 1 •i� tl I( III �� �. $ ° he In 0dtOnns d1 ss ththeJA1 PA� �, , ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know sP �_ i r l Io W 41 tI is Ae tt JA ` ka `dnl� s�t (I � ( y t I � ` I � � Ir � III ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable I I etc 11 h u---�`�p k t �" UP "- _S 'y k �®� Ili lip4 , s , ,44,rp [ t. ; ethe . NLaE a esttheltr eah r wen yamN� yet r tfi a I � faEN 3 N � N�' �� t Ii t a � lap 4th E '' •a Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as'Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 14 7i. For all filling activities.ideitified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the filt;material, t' e°amount in cubic rds`tl at wilt u art and where;,�ttril,l`be pia�+e`d� tf�ie Page, 1/1 cg i 8 M = e� •• � tie t ���ia- � �� � avat�can OittOx i ,; ` ubtc yards } � , arfd w _ � � r� disposed Ih Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) Ihetol ❑ Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8�a De ibe ho er th ; are is deigned ova .� « and inimize adverse impacts to the aq envi n e ❑ Not applicable :s8b. Wilt your project i pact. yr rb dy r e ea mound waterbody? y , ❑Yes ❑ No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 14 8c _Hie you p � f, c1 a rrh lg�an�t cc ipensate� r�the pro, t"s a v r a pacts d n wetland ``''.. .{.,gyp gyp}{ * �Ti ${� tt OVA SR 1�$ �e G 4-7'4 L� �� FaRW T _t 4 u s ,t y d€ ' �� I.�1't1ti It ' I rh91 knot b`�. 1t1 9, _ l t � 4 ? tit q � iE ;.? :14k,'.i e-91Al . . . r` ��_W ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable �' -"�i, i I i q4`: � ��I) +� ( �t1 � 4 a � + t ' � r s ® a ®i • � y i tlP4 '1 I 61 edk tore yacte> her _, r ' a}=€t r6 r ii ul, Ie be Y y Activity(clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area(sq.ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 of impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody 1 If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. s Indicate the days months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent'if applicable. 8L qt't ntiF�r+ l ctescr be tl e l� r -i ct natt rel.of'ti ,=ri � a ount(IR cubic rya 4s) . tau wilf anct 4 re`it wilt-be pla d Into he t�uat r y i re ,I � ¢. Page 9 of 14 JARPA Revision 2012.1 8g, or alll a ccavating br d dgi activities.identified,t $ *,describe the method for excavating or fired r q !e and'*itOtititbt n t nat v tit will remove, aria wft re the tinateriai will t?e dbepos ,» G Page 2 Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. ' Ww n� �'Tr 1 n hisp ct�,' I C �� + ' I6 �e n s! tr uaPa- n ttawM ( p,• S, ' ` r l k ( ) s l A471-„fa- n!' SA . ,ko gAri Iai o o I a � i" , omt 1• e� l c , i Lit A 7 SP i o dg !g ty I: ripshrgek ri€ depart t of Et 6 r ' I� tiQua As essrne f tc}ai at ❑Yes ❑ No '. Whatt U.S.Geological Survey Hydrological Urtit e' Hl )isrthte protect rn' .; e Ga to htlia.rlcf ub,e, .acv to in fi l l i t . dt_ hat=Wat r Resource�"l a It r t Area N a a r tlae protact Vin? a :_ �r a ;j o tt3 t fp l sue+ y. �i I f {€ sluur / u ia.f t ie d fhe WRIA,#. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 14 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy wagav/programs/wq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. n Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is thkraathor'elie � environment designation? [help] • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic ❑ Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertyping.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ❑ Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help • If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ❑Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [help] • If Yes,please describe below. ❑Yes ❑ No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ❑Yes ❑ No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 14 r 9L Name[ ecies listed under federal Endangered Peel' 4 et that occurs in the.wi intty the c c ', " `ea '�� ht be 4fected.by tl ,proposed P ark. lei a.ill¢ w ,;, 1-1-x" . Page 8 7L ai i�g5i §r "` p •� �Il G,III '''I , , 'R iftiti,, iI, i ° s or habitat he s ington " r , i `tsl'ili! nd WI1 eI ;P h' He l d v "��I` '�_z'sQ1 -i+ { a i hbhera y ` '1F� �I� 1,„, M (ry ,, I i F n r L,�i [,, fly,, 3�N� (lai IP m rc FT _ .- I. ,.. 11 �- r G _._ .. _... _ s' ' r Y xt e�. .,, .. .. ,o9i F ruar ., Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help(a�ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. e mow, _ It �,. I .,y , , 'tfa 6 tjta ce i. the State EI ►ircnmer al Policy Act(SERA, )'. ' heck all that apply.) i.� ''r�r or', �f1fd 4tio11 ¢c 4t SERA,0' �fo sniff+uw.ecy.wa.t of ra sfs a!se view.ht ►. . *' ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ❑ A SEPA determination is pending with (lead agency). The expected decision date is • ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 10b.)[help] [' This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (VVAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 14 ��r ,. i.= _t i -; .'l yy }'�) '��� f��i.,� I !� i _ � eh; I� �ig�l Ay' p� ° I A. Y (y� `�' N ��'� ,. ' X Y " P' h 5 � ... t t L� I F ! o s o Tkk m ' " • » "� + Ilt r wb it i m i w,: ii�!` (� '1 6b,G -: r 7_LI( (, r,.= # -,hel'r o i Local Government Shoreline permits: P ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance «_ ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): I Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance 1177'. lip r 7 i °�i tti� f`m m -^ I Ym £ a at P C ti r) -. i ..a 7 °? R� - 'i a S r Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for$150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# ) ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ) ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certificatio n d-jOR. a 7 i F ' ' United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 14 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package,ncludes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [help] tr 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [help] Page /s' I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date 11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). [help] Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA)at(800)917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev. 06-12 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 14 •T I Cb& JEFFERSON COUNTY / DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P�gQ ,✓,�C/)Cn� 4A ).,--4-4t. 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax LINO http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as "small,""medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) arid/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species, other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower, and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert 9/,acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield, septic tank,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes No Well, utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2'/2 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway, parking,roads,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes No Lawn, landscaping, etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance sq/ft Cut Fill (cu/yd) [over] stormwater calc worksheet Rev 9-9-2010—REV.9/9/2010 1 impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under naturihditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS–IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway, parking, roads, etc sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads, etc sq/ft Other sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New sq/ft Total Existing sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* sq/ft *This amount will be used BY STAFF to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) � •a�5 .". a'Y za'�yh ia„-•G r�`x A"�'q'Ry.+.EN�} ',,Y g�. sI x y r ip%r..�m.a'�k �,F.: v�r�k.�.m.� z , " >s9 �S�:d # 2 vg c% "�'sr $� ' :d d,2.a,: t. . Z>tCf-, r �a !75 4.�'3k:?^.�& .',- '�. .,x :; :,.... ate• stormwater talc worksheet Rev 9-9-2010—REV.9/9/2010 2 Donna Frostholm From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) [rmra461 @ECY.WA.GOV] P. Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 12:48 PM To: Donna Frostholm -_ Subject: RE: NOSC Pre-app Information for September 6 - Email 1 Hi Donna, Here's the WAC citation regarding shoreline permit timelines. Also below is the language from the County SMP. They are essentially the same -two years to start and a five-year duration for SDPs. Notably, CUPs have no expiration date. WAC 173-27-090 Time requirements of permit. (1)The time requirements of this section shall apply to all substantial development permits and to any development authorized pursuant to a variance or conditional use permit authorized by this chapter. Upon a finding of good cause, based on the requirements and circumstances of the project proposed and consistent with the policy and provisions of the master program and this chapter, local government may adopt different time limits from those set forth in subsections(2)and(3)of this section as a part of action on a substantial development permit. (2)Construction activities shall be commenced or,where no construction activities are involved,the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. However, local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the substantial development permit and to the department. (3)Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a substantial development permit.However, local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and to the department. (4)The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of filing as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6).The permit time periods in subsections(2)and (3)of this section do not include the time during which a use or activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions or due to the need to obtain any other government permits and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed, including all reasonably related administrative or legal actions on any such permits or approvals. (5) Revisions to permits under WAC 173-27-100 may be authorized after original permit authorization has expired: Provided,That this procedure shall not be used to extend the original permit time requirements or to authorize substantial development after the time limits of the original permit. (6) Local government shall notify the department in writing of any change to the effective date of a permit,as authorized by this section,with an explanation of the basis for approval of the change.Any change to the time limits of a permit other than those authorized by RCW 90.58.143 as amended shall require a new permit application. Jefferson County SMP 18.25.550 Expiration. Criteria for determining when a shoreline permit expires are as follows: (1)Construction or substantial progress toward construction of a project for which a shoreline permit has been granted pursuant to this section shall be undertaken within two years after permit approval or the permit shall expire. If such progress has not been made, a new shoreline permit application will be required. Jefferson County or the city of Port Townsend may, at its discretion, grant one extension of the two-year time period prior to its expiration for up to one year with prior notice to parties of record and the Department based on factors such as project-related litigation or the inability to expeditiously obtain other governmental permits. (2) If a project for which a shoreline permit has been granted has not been completed within five years after permit approval, Jefferson County or the city of Port Townsend shall, at the expiration of the five-year period, review the permit and, upon a showing of good cause, may extend the permit for one year or terminate the permit; provided no shoreline permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension prior to the expiration date. (3) Jefferson County or the city of Port Townsend may issue permits with a fixed termination date of less than five years, and construction implementation date of less than two years. [Ord. 11-00§ 5(6.405)] Hope this helps, 'U TEM Rick From: Donna Frostholm [dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 8:40 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR); KAUFMAN, LISA (DNR); SCHRECK, JEFF (DNR); Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil; Porto, Susan (DOHi) Subject: NOSC Pre-app Information for September 6 - Email 1 Hello All: Just a reminder that the NOSC pre-app will be Thursday,September 6 at 10:00. Plan on meeting just north of the railroad cars on Highway 101 (north side of Highway 101 at the south end of Discovery Bay,just west of Hwy 20). Hopefully,you can all make it to the pre-app, but if not,you should feel free to email any applicable information to me and I will give it to the applicant. This is the first of three emails... Regards, Danna';`rothol vw .associate Planner/Wetland-Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port TmvnsencC Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 8:40 AM To: 'Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)'; 'bridget.kaminski-richardson @dnr.wa.gov'; 'LISA.KAUFMAN @dnr.wa.gov'; 'Joanne L. Gardiner(Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil)' Cc: 'JEFFREY.SCHRECK @dnr.wa.gov'; 'Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW)' Subject: FW: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay- September 6 2 Hello All: Based on the responses that came in last week,the pre-application meeting with NOSC has been changed from August 30 to Thursday,September 6 at 10:00. Plan on meeting just north of the railroad cars on Highway 101,on the side of the highway adjacent to Discovery Bay. Information about the proposed project will be sent out prior to the pre-app. Regards, LUG STEM Donna.Frost -lm. # 1 . Associate PCanner/Wet&andSpeciaCist 'g Pa J` Jefferson County Department of Community DeveCopment3i' ,; 5-5 _ 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrost(wCm@co.jefferson_wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:08 AM To: 'Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)'; 'Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW)'; 'bridget.kaminski-richardson @dnr.wa.gov'; 'Joanne L. Gardiner(Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil)' Subject: FW: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 Hello All: This is a follow up to the email I sent earlier this week. The project engineer is not available for a pre-app on August 30 so the applicant(North Olympic Salmon Coalition)would like to know if state and federal agencies are available for a pre-app on Tuesday,September 4 or Thursday,September 6. For those of you who responded to the previous email to say that you could be there on August 30, please tentatively keep that date on your calendar. The applicant would like to keep the August date if state and federal agencies cannot be at a pre-app in early September. While he would like his engineer to be available at the pre-app, it is most important to him to have a date with the most regulatory staff present. Please let me know whether or not you would be able to attend a pre-app if it were changed to 9/4 or 9/6. Thanks much, Do s a.Frost-holm/1J Associate P anner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community DeveCopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 3 From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:24 PM To: 'Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)'; 'Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW)'; 'bridget.kaminski-richa dso @d 'Jordan, Jess NWS' � 1/1 Subject: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay-August 30 Hello All: : Y;� �j7o pf The North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC) has submitted for a pre-application meeting for modifications to the south end of Discovery Bay. The proposal is to: • Remove a portion of the water line; • Re-construct some existing development in a new alignment; • Re-locate a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail; and • Restore a section of the shoreline. NOSC would prefer to have state agencies present at the pre-app, and the Corps if at all possible. Please let me know if (1)you are interested in attending the pre-app and (2) if so,could you be present for a pre-app at 10:00 at the south end of Discovery Bay on Thursday,August 30, 2012. Just as an aside, NOSC completed some restoration work in the south end of the bay several years ago. This pre-app is for the next project proposed for that general area. Regards, Uonva.j•=ro thoivw Associate PCanner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port 7otivnsend,'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojeffersonrwa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 4 1 Donna Frostholm From: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS [Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mil] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:41 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: NOSC Pre-app Information for September 6- Email 1 (UNCLASSIFIED) Importance: High Classification: UNCLASSIFIED �" �, 'W.S� i Caveats: NONE (/ Donna, I have to cancel my attendance at this pre-app. I apologize, another meeting has preempted this site visit. I have been on the phone trying to work around it and there just isn't a way. Please do not reschedule on my behalf but would it be possible for me to meet with the applicant on site at another time? Again, my apologies. Jo Jo Gardiner Regulatory Project Manager Columbia River Section U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District (206) 764-6878 Original Message From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 8:41 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); bridget.kaminski-richardson @dnr.wa.gov; LISA.KAUFMAN @dnr.wa.gov; JEFFREY.SCHRECK @dnr.wa.gov; Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Gardiner, Joanne L NWS; Susan Porto Subject: NOSC Pre-app Information for September 6 - Email 1 Hello All: Just a reminder that the NOSC pre-app will be Thursday, September 6 at 10:00. Plan on meeting just north of the railroad cars on Highway 101 (north side of Highway 101 at the south end of Discovery Bay, just west of Hwy 20). Hopefully, you can all make it to the pre- app, but if not, you should feel free to email any applicable information to me and I will give it to the applicant. This is the first of three emails. . . Regards, 1 • Donna Frostholm From: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR) [Bridget.Kaminski-Richardson @dnr.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:33 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: SCHRECK, JEFF (DNR); KAUFMAN, LISA(DNR) LUG ITEM Subject: RE: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay-August 30 Donna- 4 4 September 6th would work best for me, but the 4th will also work. Bridget From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:08 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR); Joanne.L.Gardiner@usace.army.mil Subject: FW: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay-August 30 Hello All: This is a follow up to the email I sent earlier this week. The project engineer is not available for a pre-app on August 30 so the applicant (North Olympic Salmon Coalition)would like to know if state and federal agencies are available for a pre-app on Tuesday,September 4 or Thursday, September 6. For those of you who responded to the previous email to say that you could be there on August 30, please tentatively keep that date on your calendar. The applicant would like to keep the August date if state and federal agencies cannot be at a pre-app in early September. While he would like his engineer to be available at the pre-app, it is most important to him to have a date with the most regulatory staff present. Please let me know whether or not you would be able to attend a pre-app if it were changed to 9/4 or 9/6. Thanks much, Do wia';tro tho nv .Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Tbwnsenc‘ Washington 98368 dirostholin@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:24 PM To: 'Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)'; 'Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW)'; 'bridget.kaminski-richardson @dnr.wa.gov'; 'Jordan, Jess NWS' Subject: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 Hello All: The North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC) has submitted for a pre-application meeting fo ifi �s; o the south end of Discovery Bay. The proposal is to: N iVv • Remove a portion of the water line; -•- -�,.,�, • Re-construct some existing development in a new alignment; ` ; • Re-locate a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail; and ,U • Restore a section of the shoreline. NOSC would prefer to have state agencies present at the pre-app, and the Corps if at all possible. Please let me know if (1)you are interested in attending the pre-app and (2) if so,could you be present for a pre-app at 10:00 at the south end of Discovery Bay on Thursday,August 30, 2012. Just as an aside, NOSC completed some restoration work in the south end of the bay several years ago. This pre-app is for the next project proposed for that general area. Regards, Dovwta/Fro-tholAty associate PCanner/WetlandSpecialisst Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrosthofm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Donna Frostholm From: KAUFMAN, LISA(DNR) [LISA.KAUFMAN @dnr.wa.gov] Lt'', , ITEM Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:04 AM To: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR); Donna Frostholm Cc: SCHRECK, JEFF (DNR) RE: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 The 6th is best for me as well. Lisa B. Kaufman Restoration Manager Orca Straits Aquatic District Washington State Department of Natural Resources (360) 708-7226 (c) (360)854-2808 lisa.kaufman(&dnr.wa.gov www.dnr.wa.gov From: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR) Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:33 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: SCHRECK, JEFF (DNR); KAUFMAN, LISA (DNR) Subject: RE: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay-August 30 Donna- September 6th would work best for me, but the 4th will also work. Bridget From: Donna Frostholm fmailto:dfrostholmOco.iefferson.wa.usl Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:08 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR); Joanne.L.Gardinerusace.army.mil Subject: FW: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 Hello All: This is a follow up to the email I sent earlier this week. The project engineer is not available for a pre-app on August 30 so the applicant (North Olympic Salmon Coalition)would like to know if state and federal agencies are available for a pre-app on Tuesday,September 4 or Thursday,September 6. For those of you who responded to the previous email to say that you could be there on August 30, please tentatively keep that date on your calendar. The applicant would like to keep the August date if state and federal agencies cannot be at a pre-app in early September. While he would like his engineer to be available at the pre-app, it is most important to him to have a date with the most regulatory staff present. Please let me know whether or not you would be able to attend a pre-app if it were changed to 9/4 or 9/6. Thanks much, Dona/Fras holA i Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialisst Jefferson County Department of Community Development 1 Lip ITEM 621 Sheridan Street Port'Townsend-Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us - Clge (�f of` / j 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:24 PM To: 'Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)'; 'Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW)'; 'bridget.kaminski-richardson @dnr.wa.gov'; 'Jordan, Jess NWS' Subject: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 Hello All: The North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC) has submitted for a pre-application meeting for modifications to the south end of Discovery Bay. The proposal is to: • Remove a portion of the water line; • Re-construct some existing development in a new alignment; • Re-locate a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail; and • Restore a section of the shoreline. NOSC would prefer to have state agencies present at the pre-app, and the Corps if at all possible. Please let me know if (1)you are interested in attending the pre-app and (2) if so,could you be present for a pre-app at 10:00 at the south end of Discovery Bay on Thursday,August 30, 2012. Just as an aside, NOSC completed some restoration work in the south end of the bay several years ago. This pre-app is for the next project proposed for that general area. Regards, Darma.Frosth.:Am/ Associate PCanner/Wet(andSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend 'Washington 98368 dfrostholin@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Donna Frostholm From: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR) [Bridget.Kaminski-Richardson @dnr.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 2:35 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Jordan, Jess NWS Cc: SCHRECK, JEFF (DNR); KAUFMAN, LISA(DNR) Subject: RE: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay -August 30 Donna-Thanks for the info, myself and perhaps 2 others(Jeff Schreck, Lisa Kaufman)from DNR will be present on 8/30 at 10:00 at the south end of Discovery Bay. LLO6 ITIEM Bridget a,@ Bridget Kaminski-Richardson ; Aquatic Land Manager 360 732-0934 From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:24 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget(DNR); Jordan, Jess NWS Subject: NOSC Pre-app at Discovery Bay-August 30 Hello All: The North Olympic Salmon Coalition (NOSC) has submitted for a pre-application meeting for modifications to the south end of Discovery Bay. The proposal is to: • Remove a portion of the water line; • Re-construct some existing development in a new alignment; • Re-locate a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail; and • Restore a section of the shoreline. NOSC would prefer to have state agencies present at the pre-app, and the Corps if at all possible. Please let me know if (1)you are interested in attending the pre-app and (2) if so, could you be present for a pre-app at 10:00 at the south end of Discovery Bay on Thursday,August 30, 2012. Just as an aside, NOSC completed some restoration work in the south end of the bay several years ago. This pre-app is for the next project proposed for that general area. Regards, Do-vwta,Fri .Associate PCanner/Wet(andSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port'ownsend, Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Colleen Zmolek From: Lisa Yobbagy-Keller Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: FW: Maynard Pre-Application Materials J Attachments: SitePlan-PreAppSubmittal.pdf Page This ids for the PRE app submitted last week. ✓`' r. , .L'oa.ifiGelle £%5 Permit Technician II Dept of Community Development lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us (360) 379-4450 All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note: DCD hours have changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday thru Thursday and closed on Fridays. From: KevinL [mailto:projectmanager @nosc.orgj Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:26 PM To: Lisa Yobbagy-Keller Subject: RE: Maynard Pre-Application Materials Hi Lisa, It has come to my attention that the hard copy site plan and vicinity map I submitted is different than the digital copy that was provided to you. The digital copy is the most recent draft and has the most up to date information and I would appreciate it if you could use this vicinity map for each department reviewing it. I have included it again as an attachment. I apologize for the error. Thank you, Kevin Kevin Long Project Manager North Olympic Salmon Coalition proiectmanageranosc.orq (360)379-8051 205 B West Patison St Port Hadlock, WA 98339 From: Sarah Doyle Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:19 PM To: lisa@co.jefferson.wa.us Cc: KevinL Subject: Maynard Pre-Application Materials Hi Lisa, 4 ; Kevin Long requested that I send you this packet of materials. If there are any issues with the PDF's please let me know. Thank you! Cheers, Sarah Doyle Stewardship Coordinator North Olympic Salmon Coalition 205 B W. Patison St. Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Phone: (360)379-8051 2 a y 8 'y rn 3 ' 4 v -OLD GARDINER RD ;� m m 'J `O s 'f z C<Z ,') A 0 ., A C 'e M m M� m z CP < O m €', o 0 m m °zf H m 0 D Or O Z > -C Z m F> m — > 4' x � O M z 0 zcn 7) 7i ' O O O� = Z C m #, )11b.. H A n t g/ I A , aY Y $, co ,Y Cti kr i ,(D Ca Ey x2:3 Cli ':71. D pp�� m m fie✓ 11 \ n . littook --I p Ir\--p\-) I 2\-• r \ is co oz y - 82: c0 D o if E, F4. O w 11),< S) o S -' m ‘ WiNifl` v v APN: NAME: d os •„„. PR E10, 9- Add.APN Add.APN ,7rp.T.61,2771,:r73-4764 , L 17-77;vo • SPAAD Category Intake Req's 0 Cases/Conditions by Parcel# 0 t'gptS, ' AO0 .• •.•.•.•.:. .•.:.•.•.•.• •• •••.„..• •.• Plat Maps ■T■ Road S tern • .".". Assessor Maps-H 0 um High-light parcel on Map Parcel Tags-H U 2000 Shoreline Photos 0 girtijil Left/Mid/Right Shoreline Polygons 0 ME D PP$trean Crass DNR Stream 0 111101111 LFA-Fish 0 . Marbled Murrulets 0 • Spotted Owls mg. 0 Eagle Batd N0q4ig-Ciff#0 Priority Habitats and Species 8/06 MAME Type LI Rare Plants-Ecosystems Imam 01 Type: Seismic Hazard 0 Landslide Hazard 0 1111M1 .13ZIEZEI Erosion Hazard111011. I 0 $84001i:iFooiAi*areas Wells-Chloride O 11111011112 II No parcel label SIPZ 0 NM Chanel Migration=MI 0 Afrport Overlays No Shooting Zone MIN 0 LIDAR Hillsha de 0 No parcel label-Printed with Countours •\ 20e5 Aerial Photos 0 ME No parcel label MLA Number Form ED 0 Pre Applkaton File l Reviewer Letter Sent 0 0 Eagle 0 Wetland 0 . .. R.OcrOir0:0 1000 •.•••• • ••.. •• • ••• • ••.• •..•••• .•_• .......................... , ESA Map Checklist 10-13-2008 I Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map , i Fflr Y �� i4<°"r�,,A 1— _Ie.' ';,---::'-'71-e,„,e._';`"55---A ____'-!V-‘)S . fillel , ---.4:„.„,,,r___, _ 11M1 /-,,„)_ k ay a pa nd r -)2 Y . k ' ' r TownshiLines d JC_Rwds L Parcels41 24sw 1 �_ fr v r ar.'7'a I ,� �� , 7f� t r s Sk20 f i i tip,t,.. ii -_ _- t 1;/ /� �.+I/_ ---.L 1 E ...„.. : ,JoJ S._cry,,3 ,ry..c.L.,.y-:c GlS W Bentley Pl ;;eimemlovisennt2,411 + FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 17:40:17 2012 # Page 6'7 ofc7/87 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map iipiiii MilithrPj Legend Selected Features f Township Lines - JC_Roads i--. - -t---- ,.r... Parcels-H '' � a., b'' County Zoning oa 4 �• t MPR SF Tracts Y. ^'" -:. Rural Rasatemtai 1:5 tif`P C . Rural Resetemal 1:10 �.Y�-.d" +'Oi� - �w -.. Itw.Roswant of 120 ' �' .r ?% \11'.::;' eti MI MPR-3ngto Forney ..---..- - nY0 ■ MPRitutlaarrus I '� MPR.Resort Complex Panes and Recreahou 1 s"i ■ . MPR Open Space Rural Forma ..... 1..-.1._-..._H PP «_7 ,f Cemmerctai Fpneet V i.. mfioalog Forest sl, Rowe Indust nal 1 Y9N�ir4 p .. Airport CPF ♦ r 1 •-i° ' IN MPH Village Comer _......� - .:. F2rrrn 'fig 0.P 1:20 is e,,kp . Rwaa Ytaago Center �... b Sk10 ■ Resource Based Ind. _ r- * �. - Light mdustrol k �. h� +•. _.. - .. MPRRocrmbon A. waste Mgnvt CPI Cam ; e . .1 LlC �a ® Crossroads GC j ■ ----- -- Crouroaes-NC y—.. r �Y . AL 1:20 UGAUrCan Conmwrcal UGAdlrese ugnt mdustnal Maps crewed by JeOaam CoaYy Cartel Samosa GS to en tleP , t2428 tIGA•MDR //�� (\� UGA•t1DR �f - /'V / 'r`J LIGA-LOR j��///,�/�vA 11GA�LDR /A1 / (A- /t2/ A.&n..-A /,(J��) /V / c w� UGA VISaer Oriented Commmctal v G G'j L- (/d MPR BRN Brmoon CFneral R so rce Overby r Forest `+/` M mast Resource Coe ane (1 v-1)551/76)g 4'07 ) X1 P1 T 0 /-:0 et-yv\ Vti, . tl- :v8 Of FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 17:13:28 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 'OS | Legend Selected Features JC_noads • Parcels-H Water Service Areas • aoNzm / I I «"�an. O'pea MOJA-rEL � ' '� x��o ^o � /l / S. , \ i/ . � � | v., ~ :WI',CO �3emVe y :==aosm"'a411 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JeffemonCountyd000notahesttudh*aoounyoyof1hodataounCaimadhoeinandmakoo no warranty with naapectVoita correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 17:20:45 2012 ---- - - —~~— � " - ` 6rnp://` u .car .c .B ' 9S ' Cli .0— 8/3/2017 Laserfiche WebLink Page 1 of 1 Laserfiche` WebLink Help Logout My WebLink Browse Search ( $ + Page 1 of 1 Go ®` oe rrll f7'��y lJ_'i I. 13 O 0 — 9.23% + Pages 1 to 1 Template:Plats&Surveys JEFFERSON>Plats&Surveys>07>7057A Name 7057A Quadrant 'r'. .7 r'9'ic3 ALL . Section , 77"k p 13 --_`- Township 29N —____......_. Range ag ; , � Plat Name JUNCTION CITY Survey Type LONG PLAT A'n' Volume 2 JUI4C it 1011 C 1 -11r Page 103 �5FERS •. _ Surveyed Plat —sCaL[4o r*t..` Eh■.vcn.� .. .. ._.rt... • Block or Lot L r, yyv 2nd Section rL`r yws:• e.�"::::: --- -...r .,.. Awvr...,.,_... ,.u,-.l Htn-r On noti,,GN cu∎M. AFN w, . r : /7057 .- .t g -A � w-.. ... �� � ` � � rR`,` � u•. - d to � � ,� , '� V r AMT ` . cwc ra,ur :,,,t , 02. —� �t0'!s. tFFJ l ` . -� - ■ Powered by Laserfiche WebLink version 7.0.5.Laserfiche is a registered trademark of Compulink Management Center,Inc. This copy is registered to:Jefferson County Central Services http://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/weblinkext/DocView.aspx?id=3203&dbid=1 8/3/2012 L.P-\iil 2?1/03 I jtocifioN C Illi Y JEFFERSCH S WASHINOTON. ------- SCALE 400 FEET PER INCH-.v...-. -_- 4)............),‘,*,,,,, gt....M...e..0-............c...,....,g...1k.•-.........c..3,,,amt............i.......4..\- ........1,..................1-4 e-,--,1.3 k,3"......6 *A.. J...14.,* 1.■4 4..., 0.1..... c....,. 4 1........ t .L. 1+-4 4 •. - L-x..* - ) ....'. u*0,,,"*.\at.. ........■.....k L 4 t...,.......,'+-4 It LI/6'A ...x...... Ai-.I vt ti.A .I.... 8 lk iL 4 t...sr.-,.. I.Ilf,L.,.3,... €.,......,r,--1 ir.-... 4.-..1...... .... +..........: ..1( ......... ...... i..r......., ,5 L,....-,,,.x-- k1,41,,) ......,66.6,... ,a6, IC,t..........- A:. ......14., 9-J......,,,,LI ........k ...-wi 1...............,1,4 ill,\ ............, ',........,.......I - t*,.1 4,,, . -.1,......-.6......1 P.............. .. ‘•* ...6.6.. OA,,,,..L.,....6.....6........- ....6.la ;66,.: 66...66. 0 "0 ...., .;*, -1,34t. 411.,75 NEWTON D ON A T I ON CLAIM. t L..... 4-ko....1,.-........3„. e.--s,..a.;■.,...rk s..4.7......) .x...-....., ..... A.....,,Ar.........,t J.....4-. t..--I■ t 30.--,3, 9.,-.., A. ..t..., -,. '04*'Olt i. ,.,. 1 et. '1 ii* 4 3 q CA.; t.....-\ ..-1, 4.-A,............-,..C.,.....t...-1 ... ,.....4.........-,. ...-t..:„ t.t. t* AT-1,•••,-.:3Y,Pit:.1.....Ti-'....-- 17010:4V. cev or' V;, .;Irl''''':'-i,''•*!..4^. .314'It'-..; 40'•4 ...-4 ...• 9-,L7t-1 4t. -4,- ?....., lb■-•••,... .--L.....1 t K.........:-..-,1 6 ttgi`,S ,A•2", -,,,y, ,:444.:361, '......„4.",*•::,r04 t 6'°-'-'t "1-'-' '-''''''''-' g"--4 4 L---.\ "-"--- .-- ^-i-.,{•-.---, .- t■■070-- „gel,v". ii•.0* ,,la•,-,:t. ' . 11.1.414)*„,44.,•s,t ,■,---C.,-.":L-Ls., , .t rt:-.. . - '.1t,4441;# .2....!.......x.., 3.:, ,,...- ,t-uk...... k : ........ .......- ........., 4-.... c.......-. .. 1,...:1,,.....r.A.......-c'tt/ 7,--,:t.277,, ...-4-71-1'7'.-...,..■,1--....,...- --. tiet..$4,7e.., " A`i,4,#' Oro.AP;44.o'1, -'v iit,74 v!*, ,''''. 3- 4.--th 4 Iv...L...1- w ib ov\t ".0.,,,,#*44 10",.,, l' •A*0* 0:0•,'.....A*0 47.* ,-,44/i'. ,-'4 1,._r... _ 4..,t..*is? -1 C..1....../...,,,,1,--,,,,,,,; izZ-3.- •iV.-0 I- V.-1), , ,,',..1,N-, .... --,... ot„ s.tt ' ,o,r t---„r-t<--tr.,,.-, d,...\ I. *.4,*0 1,s...-'-,.1,.....,,,'4.44,;.■!,- ,,,10,,,A. Y ......43.r... Sox\ '3'0 T LIM NE R S ' ' •':-....;i•ik",,* "•1"- -.V ..,`,..-ift,AIDW"..s/ itt-...Cate;vec-0,Wr 'ley 4 1# ., %,,..A..., Ae-,4,9••. ,,,ik•0. ,,, ..J r`' *kV.101'''-fi Nilr■itpr'ki..w* t 4,AO*". * ' , - '0' A I 0% V 14'.' 1'0'4 1' S% : I• ** 00. . *0'• ' 4,40 440 ,,p '. 4,44- 9 . ,.-4,, I*A,% 1 61'. 4 ,40. A• _ , „..i .,N 44,, ;.* „wsik,#.0, 10%yoit .-100 ---" cc_,..,...---,-,-J-v-----c• ,. 890y, Ap.,,,,,,41%,ott ,,,..<*tr. V P v N. 416 . ■ It,% 0 '..,"' - 1-4/6... , $‘144 SX* 0/.4,*:?d .4-$7 ,.10.4. I , , .......--....‘,JA ,..A.L.....t...- 3,1,......, ,.....,333. w L.,....,Lw, ... OS'. * ****' =,=4:-■•• 0 o-lo °,44. • 0 ow. 44--... .....-A ,-4, 9.......1,..........,•...-L 3,...,..1/4....-..,, .. ....3.4••••-•-.-"••• •-•-•,..-y-A. 4 'IA' 10' A. ' '0. 4.... ,a- .l....... II"'. '14 ', -.4, .41,.....11 ,AI,....* tk ...Lik,, , . A, , * •.0: ,,A, ....A 1,,,a, A .--A ...--4-....--,..-- ---.C...a....Th....^.----.- ,A..- .....,,,,..i Itl■'. ik tr•'117" v4Vi,ri,Ilt, ,,,4*. ilbr ', '4,..,*‘''' ** Att'''' ,trt".**„ ,L.., —... 4 4....--t: ---J, ........................... ......, Jr-,` ....-..,....4-,,,...1 -$1' *.4 i.1 k .di, ,44 k'• -..14 . . 44--• 4 4 ''' '''' ;7;s. 1t 4....„,,,....-4.4.,„4„..- „, 7.,,,,, ... tW' *6'f tr ,,, IP'Mor. ,-6A ....1 -,,.....,.)..- a. 4 ,eq■ '' 0'. 10' t° 44%v %'',0•"4 i4t. 4'0,01"%ION,. '4' It. * *, fe"vi■-,OP •-.• ,.• # 0.-W '4, ..10. $S ti.%‘•ki itie," 4.0 0 J, 0=4% .4.#'0,-, 14•-0 (5.,;,?,)- n"---'7 ----' '--r77.- t'1/4°"" -,_ .,6 i-,. ,....,.. • -4 %* i'., 11: 404, j•*-‘c'#e 4,44 0 ,'`.***"* '* 144**-■•*V'II** le 1. 0,.■-' 11 0****.' sOb• • t' 0.% •,,t CO-A ' 0 Ifr *--• '4- - .a., , .......,-,e, `isitAve A, -'v.: % 0 , 0- t 1,• Iv vt.t- 4. k, 4 *0', itt-ie, "4"-'fr ''''''."..0' , 7• lilt 1%'*4'4A**Al t.%*4410 11'`ii 14\1 At■I'' ;...%44-; 1:'' , 0,4* '0. le• 141'' .st* 4* % - * Laserfiche Web Link Page 1 of 1 Laserfiche Web Link Help, Logout I My WebLink Browse Search 1 :" + Page 1 of 1 Go T • ' _-.4,1 Qg Tei a .4)(1. - 9.23% + Pages 1 to 1 Template:Plats&Surveys JEFFERSON>Plats&Surveys>V2>V2p038a Name V2p038a , 7,...,,,,/?gill ri°77p Quadrant A ALL Section 13 Township .;' e 1g' 29N Range • 2W Plat Name PLAT OF JUNCTION CITY Survey Type LONG PLAT . • - • •• Volume • . I.- . .!! .f1r)'; ".i 0, 2 Page ,it t r ,„,„i, 1rt, 38 . .. L -- 11 ' Surveyed Plat t.. - •..., I f IL,z - ', ..: ' l, . 4 t. -44 : -: I 1 '. ...'t.'=:,!;y Block or Lot "t. IA .:sr tiv, 0.411 1 t: \ -.`2., ! L.• /.;.•:,:i.'-',,t:f,1 • 0- 2nd Section 1.E• 'g 'i•Ll' AFN :_,,, N/A k a 1 4 I It*r, 1.:-.7...j..--41- ;'..= ' : -; .,.,'',,..:_i:::,,,:t: :4 1.4...4, .1 4 AN ' ..-, ;.-.:;•• g 1-3 E.'. ,, x : 11 1 1 tittki,- ' L - ,, . .., —. ,. ...., `-.. t %_.L.,,,,,--.: .:mri: , : .•'7 AN'e ;',.1.!1;Y.,=.'4 FIT rf■ i alt IL . .1gt tti ',,5,:,0:',.. .4',. A 'L. -; r•..: i:Iiiv ttf 0 ILi -•,,, ig ..: l'-''' :': : fr.6 tit,tf• , • 0 !. ' ■''%ti,1.., ;■{.040,41 .. ii 'Ivi,: I oor,,, ic e 4, ': 7 . ::. : ^ - C .---4 & ! 1::. • s' , - •,,,: ; ,4:?fil:i tr.1 -..__ po HI ' ''' N, ...,,,r t. ■ Powered by Laserfiche WebLink version 7.0.5.Laserfiche is a registered trademark of Compulink Management Center,Inc. This copy is registered to:Jefferson County Central Services http://test.cojefferson.wa.us/weblinkext/DocView.aspx?id=10141&dbid=1 8/3/2012 L.P.-VW 2 P938 's g ,..., 41.431 113,07 301113. ......., -. COL Ca 0,331 1134.411/ Ia.. 1-I 41 1 .1772 07,0 43 a.0 ..„ 7141 M.0 FIN 174.: ',Oa. 4 ;- t r •,-„ ell• ___,_I----S 1•31,-CEM NC,,oci r e., •'-- ,.„1".0 72 0 crI731 7 on Fa- -....---- --.1.::q 1 .,, ' g %' ' '-"' 4 -- 4., Ea . t , :ma)J.:'... .rn ,4,4 , t• u „1410.•mo co.-33o of EP2 --, ?"'3 t- %NE 3.70:3 p.33111 0.MC. • =CC awn 0 ICI l'.)OF MIN17172 Lli3i U-s /„...... ) - r ,-, '5,,t• tit ME 2,1 /6 a, 7 ••• 20.1, C'. t • [731 0101 0 73 CINI ea, Lmni S...--. ',/ 1 i',- [re V - IT 73 or.ILI CM 113 013 OM il/r1101 01170 12001 13110 CO 31.,-13 17.422 17,22.• OD c_ az, ma, ,„ ,,,, ,„ Lim-lapel-ripe reirt. ,..sumisAt.6 rill ....91to,Iglus"Erlw,,•vo 0 0_0 CP103 Mr 73 0 IS • . 70 0/43 OM 1010 . 4.11,..73 FrIg K2 ma &,...,9 ...,..,a ier.u,.....,, f 3. - I. -s. \ 1 0 ro-- ° -, ar..,,me,seh.re,u.'grJ 3 0173 CIP.73 EEC CI3 Ell 73 01 110 10431 EA 01 .. ...... 0 LA CM ICI C 011 ES C 0:... 3..me up.0 ..10 71 MI em 0 ME 0 1 0 10 C 0 ^ ...94 72 NM 321. 0 ma..,1313 131,1.0 0()cm 0(..,0 10 am Em. 't 0 0 r.,cm 110 0 73 113•0•,47'70,cc 7 p 0 713,t CI 3310 71,1cr 1ST 0143 0173 0133 =Glee,,,7.1'0 Ince-1re,.res.:.,OMR 0.73.mi..;• :Or.111.1 MO 13■1.3 crime,43100 F1L,0 A LIAO A ELAM CI OA AN 41 OA.13" ; 2 I M 71113 .03 CU 71< I MI,..1311.0>113.11C1`a CC ID,MI I CI,..EY.NM .• , . r/ ••••••L„,0. 'MI MI MS MI a Ma 111--Mil MI,MIL M., MI••am 0-...mm Lona.acc . _. • / 1-rCo 5 7 1.I 01 hl • \ (...L'',t'. i SE 113 NEI 01 0 MI CM NEN 24 1112,0 010 0',NNE ma cm 0.1,am cm C4..12 L GM 73 cr.73 CM 731 0 73 CV IS()CP ICI 4.EP/33 01 ICI 0 0 ■/11■44 zoo, 120 77 COI an 0173 N.1,1ri Mil.M.,RM..] ;130. Oa 33 01,43 17/.4/1 MO FOWL EV Ai 0-32 023 OILEIF. ? i '--, ma....V.11=Mel 7.an no me er s ax. a: re'.&'lle ..E1 •OO C7713L F - --,-- a a a a a., 0 ma ma 1113 WM IIMI MO MN IM.'AM nr.z,, sr a To,c,;ea,1 3 mml I=a ..c. E..,.. co ,..\I;kin rr,ria, L12%1 ?._ 1- ,_. - ....- re 3. E.". ..... CI..C1 CV.MI • as 03 crica 0/0• •-• 1-, 1., rrl ,„------- ;77.41 0 ICI 734.77 0.113 0;73 ONO 11/11131 34/1/13 117 0 me:cr, • . _ ,3„ ca•... 1314.,C. 10 711 .L"72 a 71 13'.1/1 117 173 A E3 0.4 1. -- - , 1 ...., ... .... -.. .. ... mirm rev me roam wi,..3 um dze LAI CAC CPR 11.71111 01 kO___ -./ CM 11111 01E3 0 10 in 0 Cm 711 ICE MN 0 NM ME 171.CC MO.71:1 Ea an 0 '43 0 0 1,0 mr■ t. ' CM o Cm o CM MI 01 0 24 73 CP 71 CC 71,....,CM WIC IS 0,M1I ILE Mc,- .72 nee.re,,Ns ma; 0 es, 71 :.374 41 0 I 711 0.CI CM 0 131.•,M3 Oa 73 01 I'S. ...MI,73 Ir. -.CI IiiPOICI '11:1111.70 •77713 3•03 ISTO own or.oc. trIci ar.;:ce leletrze k FT-71 1.1,1.01 - , 3 0173''WIMP. k 7 -,- - cs, szr 3r. az ma am a me Ire ..,re a a O.a pm O 17.10 MI LIC I lo.32 X 0 MIN... tr) )114 am ma Am• oN ma o ma 1M IMI to ma 0 ma-5,0 110,,FM M.,m0-- 0 o irm ma , . K.,.:V- /•• 1 .2 -.0 0 12111 ' 34 a 0 MI a 01 0 MI CE 01..112`rsc re rs a re -re Em i as re;,,, 01/ I 3r 0 O 73 CPI 73 CM ILI MP Pi N1137,12 WI 73 Ch.' t y 'CM 1131"10 WI,4 /E.1 [ --. 1_1... '2;?..7 Wtlel‘•rtEl r- ..... .,.... ...... AO aCi En me av.e.c red ;,_ 373 113,AEI i, PM • sm ma o o f BP MS WM 1.01•-*MI 4 ... ..1.. .1.112. ...•ma 0 73 131107 4 11 2 11, II ‘.7. .. a1 rligl ff:2131 MI gr 631 ig.4.11.-`•''' s_..m 117717 0 0 0 MI Er"73 CM MI CI 1'22 MOP -... M .0.0 Ela'13 ,„0 am to ma to MI VM M. MP MN IFMIIM . > ',.. 0 ILI-40 71 WM EC,a,....... .......L. ........A.„....;„„",... ... lta et%'.19.."'■`" -a m:...:-.z..-;..-.'..-lug...--r_cr". .t..,1 K --- 7•• „MHO„NM MI()Cla CM„A MI 0 0•CC 0 4 0.0 3,0 117,Ai. am. S /- . • r t :"....t I. L . = 'ra 4:11kr„,...,1,,la.,.,,,.r.r...4 Er.Et 4..ne, .,e•.r.20 MP 110 ME 10 144,cal 73km/0 747. .747/.1.6V. MAX 71.1'ir V1Y4' (I"1 , 0 071 M 0.43,0/0 00 BOO 613177,as OM A so.71,aee-lc.7,-.5- ,.... 0 Ma Mi lf. 47.231,76,...., ,walr nimme , CD ,,f ,ms,.wo.SE u MOM`CM LEI,.0110,COO 71 MM 700 100 Ir.... -. 3 t , <1 a 0 0 a CM 0 C3I MI CIE LI. 123 II2 4 0 N a1113 an 171 CM MS 0 17 al =I Ka , vP. -,.ti 37.,I3 C3 40 33 013 13.11F OM , :•73 0143 0173 10143 0.11.3. 0/71 I '-- .3 IN _EN 0 ICI MIL 1E1 KM:CI CM/47. 072 cm ma 371 l..WM IM1,CM M EMI MI 2 , • , Il ),IN.al 0 11.1 MN al 67 kr. a a 41PFtiOrc . -- 010 03 00 warkr1 Pm:.rel --I Ale-Nt rflitlirt PI 113 117.0 7110 E31.cr rub au A Ms NM 711,411177,ICE 0 0 MC 0 ,,,4 .. .3 0 TA r a 732011 MR 2.0 a 0 0 0 731 z IriP1' '''' a MI I CM 117173 10 MC 0 CI a /4RIts it q . ..-- CI 0 r.0 410.0....7 MI 40 0..01 13. O EN MI 01-0 EloM Oil; ,ENAMIN,0 1113/..0 41 10 01 me 411 , n tf"ct 4'4-L i Y.1 ? i 0 7 01711i117 117,',,,ONO EM IIE 0 mN, 0 o ? !I ! ....„-• t ? IA „ .c l'-- 0 am 0 MO'ME 711 tma INS c 0 MI 0 110 0 0 0 10' a , 4 tk) P il N... ,,,s MTA1121 WV/0 C MIII•13.,MI:El -I 4 4 ,CM MI 1E7 73 CM 01 0 1E3 - 71 7 .1 0 0 NM LEMI INC 0 43 A 1, 0 '''.< CM MI 0 01 fIrE NEC 0 SI 0 Km ea.um z Dt[ , re.0 Cc III -13 7111` •17'0 II LS O.= MN no Ex, =Ice 0 ri i 1!1,;0 irii , .14 .,... ..112.1 1/911173 .3.1 j rd qt11 " -1.-.'• Mal IS 0 > is: ..... -- • , ', 4:i1Pt irlt ,4... c., as, 71 01 . uer , 117 A 0 II'111'' ';grlit'P'zi' Ce.tsrtILP __. -, Li q, ks, 1 road Page 1 of 1 ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 282023 HWY 101 ROAD NUMBER:SR101 ROAD NAME:HWY 101 ADDRESS:282023 APT: REAL MILE POST: APPLICANT:HARGRAVE AND JANICE GARRISON-WAS 7363 HWY 101 ADDRESS CREATION DATE:03/17/94 PARCEL:902231004 LEGAL:23-29-2W GOV LOTS 1 &2(E OF SR 101)LESS TAX 4&26 LS PTN GOV LOT 1 BTWN SR 101 &RR R/W(RR R/W INCL) GRID.A-5-L FIRE DIST. ZIP:98368 POSTAL DISTRICT:PORT TOWNSEND PLANNING AREA: VOTING DIST: CEMETERY DIST: HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST: , WATER DIST: '! -- SITE LONGITUDE:0 SITE LATITUDE:0 SITE COORDINATE TYPE: ACCESS LONGITUDE:0 ACCESS LATITUDE:0 MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS http://isserver/Address/RoadAddressDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=SR101&ADDRESS=28... 8/3/2012 Z o N \ � N N �N T' 8 s : 2 8 a : 8 e o W (3 (f) I— o •~� (AV - Na -El b/Las) N. ° ve-V, AN* ,..„ X- % Cr) .10, liP-s, ii. q-, „ , %. 14140. -‹c TO tR`kV* it 2„ . , 0 II + V� V)CC cI� ` O A 000960 L, ,40*'4.. 10-1-,` oi ■*,' ,5 ,015' 0 T."1 0\4 13.4 7-'''s $t ire f fl I— v> SS- 90{.1 1�0 0,- 4,1 4' tt1, ♦ SPA 91 .17/WAN O N 7°P 4:41.1 /I" 0#0)01 ''' * ! ,,8 :7 ; _ago. 40A10 \11.qm 111001Wew-,5'106, 40°1151 4 ; 4 - ; 3 l*"; � °d R4 1°' ° '' 440 #I#A1 IC 7,47m;%) t S�a 1 N ii 110WV*, 0 mt,I" d m OW • 04i 00 TO1‘ 8.<4 .. 04:4°. .# ffrito 040 -6 0.&,-g i < ^� lam , -�1 � s� ��� � � ' W,h, � �� ) dF tz) ° �•', ,g sa3NMO rav cu � l �vws&...�— ' `w83 # (MZ - N6Z - bl b/3S) \ N_ m i 8 F:ss: o - y 3 < a °W z_° '--9 888 . :gff, £ °:S " A w zo €w-OVw <w 6. 3 8g 0.9 g VA' X w „3 .1oicw,1 t .'mss v°i w° ' ,518,24 .: � �i ag di LL d a \ N N N c11.111111j 6.�_11 i° s a p : > 8 a O 0 0- W cn 'c a m > > e a h r c N z" LLI CD goon fi (MZ - N6Z -4Z 4/t 3N)in in: _` 0 // x rQ re� <4 / Q ei U // !'*':51� \ Z ro ° o° 2 iq \ m Q r\� /// ? o . ■ V- Clt // ■ d v'ss ■ // 0o La 8 ` S` 0 / VI c ` d' 4 g'' / dS.O ' \\ B� 3 Cie\ \ Piy a l�r z \ a // \ \ 0 r / a a;Ln l` / "��\``s• / o % \' 3 \ N Ii \ r a x u N G it� y ` /// mtih Z 0 - Ni,?07/ 4\ \ ` S m \ \ it ilib:i ii Aki:101 \1°.:04:44t0 ZO/\.,), \\*'*\''''Z't.oy / 1 A 111 IV 044PM-44 tk , * \-- . \\ 8-6 p0 Ijki,% 0 gat), OtAlrilI.a - .&;. Ole, \ F / N SS. ag N sf� .a �� iiO� 5f `� \ / o EFL O' 1 yv t 1A��\ M \ 1 i O.1 (MZ - N6Z -CZ 4/l 3N) °'�a v • ::i — 888 : - ; '! 3 o FeD3 __ ` is Zo3 m $o !+,, ,aaw<J2 F ''s zw 8 igIci °.111 E, a .: z36 t3 S i 's'3y8 z,_ • 0 3: (Z' ° a ° ° i °e W p a s g 4 � 1 o , ct - M o n N N N i' vi - I o M() 0_ W o Page_it:"---afs2dd 0, _, N ��� (MZ-N6Z-az tv,MN) 7 p s\� �� �� a \ ° J LQ � ifit �� �` A r\ ). o< X33 dC7 k°'-(-) le,*79 '1710As. At&r3-0 #400"' F�\ O .m -F Q S N St' O nor• � e 20:2 0 � c4-1° o ` rF Tin tl0NV31 �Z �•4 e04 . \ �,_ 'd iii q'� / 0 '(,y d' 1 110,1 0 171111. 10�V�� �' �� �p ice- W *D\•weJ4,4 d ^�a Z I ®�'��,� OHO`��� -/ / \ \ �/�'� :4l : r� = n 1 if �j :� ,�7� `j►� - —^ N \\\ rib — — L 7 \ 'seo ���. �S J�©`f.� i � \ \ �j•,\ \ /J' D s/01FZZ05 I�, teA"-°a �OJ.© ` \ �'P�a To �1 M � M � CT T M- 2 TO'�1'-3"0 'LNO �',�� °O'O ay. \ M N 0 \ O sa3NMO MY 01 e ° m/zz/sro i o o° ; y £IBL91 $ N T J b MI N L8'LOf O8'S9f 8 N fC'S09 8;5:! i M n N I rv\ � I 1 I 7 7 7 7 7 x - 7 7 </ w'- 61&--a O N Z w O ^Z e7 L,-. 3 b O • i ooNNZ[ N O i NN M N O p.-24° < N\^0Z O— y .ZN O\,- rvi Ngry <zn (7)N 01 N g;a . rwaoV,{ < e .. .zzf91 ,�,��� <' m8 LIY90£ (MZ-Nsz-rz '/1 MN) ��° °� § 888 4 N _ • g i v w'E o z s < z 8 x wm €� . F W 3 _ =_, b F N ZJO 888 ' 3aa-og' " N 8 >s• -18il FaLcv "' ;° E^:.c yea- <ipt .>- �3aio: 8 Sb ° '- w <s • N °dn 8 3 a <ek'�z° 0�3�s a�Naw _ ff - o j4 '; Isr) Q a Z Li N p z a N U s r : g ` o U 0_ W v7� W W 3> CD o� a n o N (n F— fY o .0 9: v ) $S9s9z (M -N6 -t' 4/L MS ' ° . I 4 41% . I \ _____ V l m �omof N ` Qa (J4A e [71.4d 8i dJ .0o \ 3 Y N O S� '\__ —_—_ ,P'' � ° w `ct IT y `hby.h o +° Y $ n «;1 9ao a.% F- Lt z 1 N nVm > U '4•;- ��oe <R c O rr a-°s8$ g°"F� O m N Jm U bH mom°O to O...n mEOE N b 8.-6). O N 1- I. n W o O S M o Fri Z A A N O N N X Ql' V n n O Q� M.0 V v O�,M p�a° /1 HMO 40 c.xz v--ra j s,. s O�a b it :7:I s � � M M ` a., ° � m o° r H< ' �o N CO M NS d e U 0 GO -,N X 7 $ o 01-_ H_ V y d 1,ElH C n C 4>- CR Z9l 0 GP 0 m N °O„ 8 5 g *a SST L9Z «=� ZL' ° OL6 r (MZ-N6Z-CZ b/L MS) n S ° °v) •;`::: aa' a ` tea d8 g, • o}o o ao f O - - g• -_ < a s � o o g � w — o� FF2:2 o z Q r u z RRRR *glIA 0 - 2 x€o z M 8 z M cry a Z wo z a a add N 5 g $N U m N O CL L_LI . oeaa � � � m �\ N N w� N� w3> cD (n (n I— 0 w N 4. J4 ME I 1 MZ — N6Z —4Z 4/13S) Ct V /i i w.. .i cn Li INIVrI3 QNIrI NOI.LVNOQ sN• Ine ON° p k- Y.° N X N a N O <N° <N 0 NpaN Ufa.- NX0 0<! 0,1-N MI-N (I1 F-� N /0^^ vl 6, Ct N a a,° r N 28°N M N Z R g a� 1 8. N Fn $ N rte ° °'ek ° is- is- i. 9 a pc fib+y1 °b r^o p,�° WM. W WI os °°. )))H a g. `rare -Nn,° 4pW Rso 9,12 ©= �� \\'rte OW g,4" ' m�^ MEE \� 1N'7044//b m'4-775S2i 8° i WM=r in� < — / ° - 90 Zl O1 \ s Grp m / rY1'0 '16 0 ==a6 1;-":.'" ° 1 'p LS'0 � � wn a�E \ 600£9Z206l,y4) l- �� OM= j-- '�'.k a e lb7 e V' s' I N !s o a _ _ =° 1Ntrrivo .l8"8°= O rO, vr " \rn \d1, �I a.ms„ 0' xx lot S vv� �--r aei R 2 0 awl y �N 7 e m° I P ng._ `d cww _ W. Y NX� K, a "N� .no ,ID a $ 2,n v <� �� rn ti n '.� I_ g5°o * .s' =4/n Z./ s6� �'+AMMER $ � _� , re�� M0 .— sp.).xvi .,/Wxa a - 117•N-ac O6 .ZZIe%ss1 2.117•a Dn° (Mz — N6Z —CZ 4/l3S) Kllafi H \N N • `i ffi N o $ a z 8 > w a w w !$ $%i - zzo m 21 N<'8gu p,q i Wa°a ■ °o a wYtF��$ 3 i 4" „:a z o a s fq • Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• t hF� , % . ./ 1 ', w / i a i i —_ ti nn - � J . / ��Y` `" iiS wr 3r T "' � tti 4`is.t-,Na.-''', -'K s '' / Legend Ir5 U' rJ of ^"'' ; c'vnship Lines • _ t y ,.�v ` G..,yy//,,,Y,•ryS 74 . Lots x 1 • �K.w r - JC_Roads �' Assessor Maps-H f Parcels-H _____±- �--- ; Fa;- rte,lI o I s& r 0 I yYA �3 y i , 4 1 , li A p .,i 1 - I r 1,2z ■ ,g p I — mu..T.,■kd:r. Jr ^_�-rs:,c ncn"">¢, u.Bentley PI 0 ralimiimims'2-0211 1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 17:36:18 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map I ' I �_ � J k` i /s.� L V .-.. f;.6,, ,+r 4-• te..--- A''''' '',1.- -_-;,::::*''' ..-------4":?>-'" /64' Qua 71 �[Legend 4 n ; y JC Roads 1.As-"" �� , ,,--- Parcels-H 1, of �' l :}.' .c` Shorelines Arcs _._ Consrwncp'SubuMan �/ rJ 1. ' �/ Cansr'�encpMlatura, 'J , 7_ Urban r * Suburban Wand 1 �/ Natural ` ,...le o F "r" -S`�.`�?O 4.04/ Nriwa'suburban ',\4 -F I Shorelines-Polygons a r f.° i _ __ ■ Conservancy �. t 1 r J Other ' ' { I :� R� •,tir.r '.1 v::a+:r.ti.r v_,nnC_our,'...dC4 x .-h I n+ 1 1(1_. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:12:04 2012 l 81 i ' http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map \ \ P ..,,,, r' r 0.. t`3�� 'Ff',xCff - : `- � ,54 }}� '7}� hs` ;':�4 5.t /4.,:i ,, __.:::_,,,,,_,, ....... „,,,........,..r ., v� v 1]' C t` + 1 :'.:K4/ Legend �4�T x4 v /n �� E C_Roads �ti�=' .. ',' Parcels-H C j i ';! -' DNR FP Stream -/ Classification 3 ' ,-r r= F-feet Natrna� \` --, iv N•Nan-fesh Nabnat 1 Np-Non task fishnet Peron n Nl• rrf y �/r-;--,... y. . tyt`� ,./ Ns.Non-1 rsn Hahn at Seasonal __I _ r ! ' l .' 0.,•• S-Mventonao Shoreline I � r'- it � i b r i 1 . 4, , -1 i I I '2. a "r I PM e, l i f l Mats Ran.*«.4r:u-r Cola'Contra Sansone CS5 ✓ ' r! r FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:12:40 2012 I http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 44 �; ),,,5.:.... ______- ' r 'fr'f.'.-A.'">'' '''''-..,--...,......'''t \..,.... '4b : 0 Jill ' ."'X ! \ F 5 f/frr i i .77"---- . ilriffe,..e.A. 33k.."- 4' .l' ../ Legend I t. r /� JCRaads s. ms f - -,.,. _ Parcels-H J —ter p DNR Streams ` _ — I,�f Type r,Af_ Type 5 5 ./ Tyne S Type 4 r.' d 1 f" t ;.- } -. . C`- �/ Types • v r- r' JT /y , l� Omer � ',4`r --ttll-- N. [ x - Vla.r smeded�:_c'kr-sr, ru 2,r.a:3e.:.c :AS-r < .._ C U-'11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:13:03 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• ti iy `fk y tir 'PS° i1 ,y } y�1 fE } 1 ¢�! • t o � �� o*' t ysG \y ..1r +' :,)> 11111111116 . '.�;4,_„ 5y .' yr „ r'C, I \ -.t l Fri; ,�": `1`'t « 1 P} 5 .y'i 5 I.L..fir-�,,. '�'yr'.. '`• ` Le9eftf� i`,',, ,, JC_Roads 'r y _ k I �.. �'w s� Parcels-H C I (T ' 1 " 7 DNR Water Bodies i s -7,---1 , .__ e , ... i , , qi'S : d �------ - g O 2/L. - '''''-'111r,' ' //'. -I NA....„...,4 f' ,1 _. 1 r ( i .. tlnr avreled tr•.G.—wr ar ..-.ra .:.r GIS 11 'i n •t•• ��.C_ 11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:13:22 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map syy vut4 .> . �-w6 r—�_-—a>-y4 F � t '' 1 yC� tytlr::�s1F•gah :� 1 yam- ..H y --'y,^';. �� l .� [ = l? . ... T lir�;-:-.5:„,"":-,' '' �aR i.k('. Ir 10 u . F r' .- t Legend �1 _ yt rti Y' l^ JC_Roads 1''..r�1s�``� 4 C- r r `��;, + Parcels-H —� � r ,% LFA-Fish . Y:6.....20 jf ( ,,,_, "! -. ..z,, , \:,4 .,./, F..�f , r , . -A 1 li. k .. y .,5 �j 1j i S1 '' �i , I ■ a .0,,,,..r:rkd:r.-c^e• r 1r .�_ca Sa•rcr_z GIS ; r / ?dV it FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:13:52 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 - ... t% aasta1 Atlas ,. . 5 3;3" ,.. eU fit. T w'x 3 k« ''"2 m E Y° ` * T .;� _ `c d,'+.,,' ,.73 ", * . Photo 060623_00960 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 57Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels, 3290Kb) Approx. 8 seconds for 56kbps modem;1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx. 7.8 minutes for 56kbps modem;69 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992 97 2000-02 9 e� Cf Pag d i https://fo rtress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00960&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 Coastal Atlas 2 PM 120612:28 ‘..., - ... #.:,. , 1,s.; ..e.,.. . .„ ' _ . 2 _ Es�.? ry i`-s-1 ' 'tom ' m"- �, .,, "°'. ; .,.{ 'r•�w. '+y - ��-Y x, 33 3 Photo 060623_00958 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 62Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,3508Kb) Approx 9 seconds for 56kbps modem;1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx. 8.4 minutes for 56kbps modem;74 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 / toDisPlaY'asP- https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/Pho ?id=060623_0095 8kvintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 Coastal Atlas 6/23/2006 12 22 PM a a 1 -_r Photo 060623_00957 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 61 Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels, 3407Kb) Approx 9 seconds for 56kbps modem;1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx. 8.1 minutes for 56kbps modem;72 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 a° I a� F &J ' https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00957&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 WASHINGTON STATE '".11'110 rz Deft of Ecology Coastal Atlas �r 603.i-2006 12 22 PM No*, fi r . • r. 10:s .. Photo 060623_00956 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Pan Doel wnload links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 60Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,2909Kb) Approx.9 seconds for 56kbps modem; 1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx 6.9 minutes for 56kbps modem;61 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years:p Y 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 $19 a g https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00956&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 Coastal Atlas 612312006 12:22 PM - -* .0 f f. .�< ..1-:-'✓ I ,r �• 6� eq r r* °.r ' fi} :yF '" � `'lL.. Vi%• �*'y ce� 'ra v 1• . s�7 '�a CO • co ' - ''. r J‘CO ap "e y4sr# " y y l i!z? ,P = {o* �e ,',-7. cis ., 0,Z 4 z Photo 060623_00955 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution •(800 x 531 pixels, 72Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,4203Kb) Approx. 10 seconds for 56kbps modem;2 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx. 10 minutes for 56kbps modem;88 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000 02 Ty- https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_0095 5&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 Coastal Atlas v �fl 4 ZeJ," 6/23/200612:22 PM a% 6' • f" /�� *E . 3 Photo 060623_00954 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 74Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,3701Kb) Approx. 11 seconds for 56kbps modem;2 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx. 8.8 minutes for 56kbps modem;78 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 4 ` / _ai8 https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00954&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 '4;a;144°."i':'S'ikraogwyl'i Coastal Atlas 6/23/200612:22 PM n r CU Z F. ' .; eti rti Photo 060623_00954 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay Reference: Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 74Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,3701 Kb) Approx. 11 seconds for 56kbps modem;2 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx.8.8 minutes for 56kbps modem;78 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 3 https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00954&vintag... 8/3/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 Coastal Atlas 6/2312006 12 21 PM , r w . . �. A ,1‘4. r A b" ozoix4 z Photo 060623_00949 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Discovery Bay, Snow Reference: Creek Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 76Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,3687Kb) Approx. 11 seconds for 56kbps modem;2 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx 8.8 minutes for 56kbps modem;77 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00949&vintag... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map _ro, ' 122 { —. , ~ - i; • -• C �_' L t• '-�v" s;-'r �' � .r f�� .,= J S �, `,y11 p, A, 1ti• / TX y' f ". ° ....14::: -r x f Legend I a. ;; r : JC_Roads c 'r f' f'r i'-. Mr t Parcels-H .' / ( - ',' // r Soils-H I ati -.. av I / Si . , faY -.-C., HvC .. ,� ;' ! — F — r , tip�h �J,• Q�',. • >l- en �� �,4�`- ,, I 1 f; €tic C �� ,I _Q t '�f Vt cr YU:W].r Corr;C0173 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:20:26 2012 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map "'p ....,,,Z.,- 1 I 1 .,\,;•..---...,:,-,•".,,-.,-- ; .- � ` � f sue°` ��� ` � `,Li, s,.d' , b�''I f , - -`-',-c",„-----7,----=';',--,�,~ 24• ,E :.7.-;-- ,--- ,t. / f,: f"l 4. ,rI1�ii. es .1,,..,,,.-:--,,---,.1,,..,,,.-:--,,---,,,,k � .0 v, JC Roadi • �1. ..�'y 'c'''"---:*'r_�,, , Pareslsit ' Priority Habitats and ? Spseias Ic r / l G , ✓ 4.---- r'..r� J2. =fr/ . 7 ▪ '--,?a,:.-----.1-1.._------1-_,,, ',- Pag/.9,.._&''---' , I4fi -' '' )tiff} --1 `.1:u.ay.dW]1:.a4r -r?.atry Cc c-3.^�e,v:•n GtS ._.,1 ;r+ y FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:23:26 2012 ___ 7 ALA,i,6,___, /fl4 n2. Lt?-{ 5---"W -4/L. 17/ j r, , , , ---L,Litt,a_ix._ [,'1).-A)t-u--1,)--6--4, ' /),,t( 10, b,,,,Lee , ....,43-p (_cJ-dc--/-7/-ez-- i-aiv) http://gi s server/serv1et/com.e sri.esrimap.Esrimap?S ervi ceName=ovmap&C1ientV ers i on=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map s i k t k \ r 0'fN°' - eih s��r`�S� t, '��',1 K��r 'S - /_;.. "'111 VIIIIIre r f i,4, .f t ,, [s t st ` '�: r LB 9@ ft C Oat6 Ra 4 - f F �' -~ .--j Parcela4i 711-/ El Wetlands S--1 - 1 -f Ix , , '.9.0 �a.tl,f s.-rn. _oAq:'a r-a Sc-xcrs C;iS $ !' 91t3:"11_—. ■ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:26:14 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map I ri`� t ., .w.-- ..f}err 0,,dy - r t i• , ,, aJ N, s,r`: J>. ■ k,, :s/+�Y fix . �, y t M____ -1---- .. ,..,-... . ...„..........„.... .. 1 ,...-*-.--..,,,,..„-_,,,, .• , ., - .„,:.,..„...,..,,,,.„, ,,,,, ...,„ . , - 1 ,� y y t y !,6 s r ,'�.L Legend 105 r ..i +., rug Parcdail t 1J' le aaiam la ic zard J - -� t ` _ '- -_ • 1 44 �� /t -)a '� .�� �. . I 1 � 1 l r--- -/ l ,( I I Msr.rwded a zmCartaCerraSe-v csGS U 40.••11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:26:40 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 I �� - , Ouqput Page 1 of 1 Arc|MSHT�LViewmrMap / � / .' | A -_______ 1_ ______ , " . / „ ,, . t -- - ^ '. �mm�,..„3„,„,,,,,.„.„, . _ ______,,. ..„.„:„.„:„...,....„0„,.... ,, _ ___,_____ ,, ,,...„,„,;:.,.,,. ..., , ,,_,._- . ` ` /- Legend ,...,„:„.,:,,,,, � Selected Features /| — ~~^' , r""=mpu",” | / .c_moo° '' � Parcels-H — / �.�_ ,'^-~ \ ' | /� � /' �� — ' -- Landslide Hazard / ��/ /' °" s=, , '� ' �\ -~�� ./= �:��^ ( , `� 6./ `=1 __| / / |/ � - -- -- � .' m���� " � ~�/�raja t: A | / - � i [� '____/ � � . | -- w~.~v�=~`~.Corry c.=u~~�CAS Z v===illo■n2, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JofemonCuunq/doennotattonttothoaoounucyofthedataoontuinedhominandmakou no warranty with mopect1oitn correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:23:27 2012 hrtp://»ioaervcr/mcrvlet/0000.coci.coriozup.Eoricnap?ScrviceName=ovuzup&C}icutVermiou=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• r 1 ' yg'_.,"-- �.�z r�� I x --------- - ,--- UM 1--avij E I �r°"-s-�y-.•� Legend t�, . ��fr n Selected Features ` i , /f Township lines —, 1° JC_Reads — 2S/42W i �, +Y`+ I_r y I Parcels-H FE MA FIRMS &i I I c-'r /� J } nrRa A AMI Q. 1 1( ., XI I .... -,-..,, . _ ..._ X IN N. ;, lN 4 i, �, i 3.ti 1 �ai1, i r — �_ I � - — age .....e k dB, a , . ---1 _t. ,11:n:;ru.:UW. -ec:mi Cam Cc:ca,... .....2.2.,... .....2.2...GIS 1 2 0®•24211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:23:49 2012 5 3 c-,6,6 o 9 / 0 , http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map i h%`� t fA 554.+ V 0� � } i :.7-_,..r J Legend f / Selected Features !F f r Township Lines / JC_Roads ` — -- — f. _��—�7— �4� Parcels H I mo, ./ i r— r j,,0,,�_= -�� Critical Aquifer Recharge I 1 //-.— Rey Areas iF ' 1 l /`~fl SR1Q I ~.�' 17,•i ii / / / ' I I_rf ';•� I Y . 1/ i/.� I! Sy1RPA•SU9C '+ Inc J / —I SUac F �\ I�r1\1 I SARPA •ti - /41 yy , a Q^•`: r--,,, I I SAAPA UNK _ _ i 4 __ �_l Y? 1 [ . ) �_ _— .mac`_ + _ . 1a lam �q 1 Bentleylpi a I i Ir , Mt,...r:ck>]s:.,, .:n Corgi:-...':'r..a St! ,,,3t.., Z D®'2-0211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:24:56 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map , k'-:-:-_---';'-'?:',--; :-\'4,;;;'::,;:-.:A„:,.,.<---...:!''glCkf,-: t,-. v5 �t- h- - 5V �. i ,r '`4,_ 'f ix -1, %.'"" ■ ,fit I -`w Legend ��`r= - Selected Features -__�__--- – ` J. }f Township Lures I j h JC_Roads ,� r, — Parcels-H 1 YYells Chloride � �NM ■ ITS P — Q“ /d/ 1 A I' ■ il/I$ Pl* \1 n.u.clod ai-c`+a:a”CO3 ryC ca oe°:re.GO Z 0r'24211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:25:13 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map V 4 � r ' ___r_ t r›."'",:'y { it —.. F M¢ ,fig' }i 1 ii _ I Ijf -"tt,.j� 55,+' ppp 7 (-- . jf c- k " a : 4 - Y , —. Z .: Legend =-,- Selected Features I ,,, Township Lines it------729N' ZAT- —1-::::';',''':::. I - , , _ . .._ i ' / J JC_Roads Parcels-H P Farmrtou ' SIPZ _ � At R s $IP2 . It k- il., -t,4 ti R10 ill l Alan Rms Sin v X ( .. I Coata15AP2 _iv'! IA r 1 ..•// „�.,, ill 1 s 021g z Bentley PI 1I '' NA 1,1-I a:d>.1 z.'.e :<r,Corry CcFra St!;ors GAS Z p®•4.4/1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:27:31 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Mon Output Page 1 of 1 Anu|MSHTML Viewer K8a� �, .�~ �' / | � ' '' 1..:,,. RA . 1 � | W 1 / , ' ----- / ' | ,~' Legend m�z- �� •' Selected Features _ �� ` / ,r Township , / ^c_n�uo H �� p"�e/,* x*veo"om/oeoab/uv -H--- , �-1 Sam I .. .- -- L. /~ ' I `,,"", 4 V� / zl, "^°=^ H =° ^ - ^�"l i ,,_ ^ . ,,", /__ , '--I ',-,-;: .4 -'-' .--- — i .., Bentley'n ��A=� � c,9-1g � �, � _--- — \ ` _-�v���=���=�,3c�..,,uu lyz 0====='24211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- attest correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:26:41 2012 ' http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 , Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ' �� t 1 1''x- 'a s 7, a 4 " � 1 AlE a .- •'c r AID >" 1' 1 94 Legend Selected Features Township Lines JC_Roads 29N2'V�� Parcels-H ' 10h!Hillshade a / / 18 II t u•.i - ;Cr-, -- �.�,� Z 0 12A21 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:31:22 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ar t t; 3" 1 r r^', ,4 'tee- �, i , ,li r r ,yr r" + f ley • r 4 ,./ 0 0 fr/Z' f s f �j f �,c�. �G 1. f ) Y '' i 1+M}t a 0 oe u Legend . c3 Selected Features il 7 % / , - -- - i I ii ./I /_../ vrif '- :% ..' . 1,04011.0 0/o ! 1 r "Cjrf ye ~ o °' 1 Township Lines iI r %�� f�/ 1/ffjfPr r 1 r �,"tto d.._ A, IC_ROeds / // Q �r • tSGS Topos v 7 /f / , • . Juru..!'5 - a7R - "--f ` � .::',,,'J'A, -Y 1 1 22,..r--/Y - , 7 4 • ,\c": ^ - ' i? //,' ', • /1"."7--- -,,.,,,,., ,-,-,..7,-)s...,........m /i l'j _ir // 0''t.'N .. .' ', -0 it,21/ i. // /," -'.-s'. 'i.'' :---;i--- ..--,,i-. / `1 < t.:� �� /r Q` `.�,k..-yam �' ` -- , ' i 2 ; ,....i,,,,,-: ..„ , , c �. ,:.:... 1 .i' . , I . � ,/ / a CI , I , 1 f Y . �. � •1.' f , Irk / a?y ' i j 5 i i '� fJ C r i E.? Bentley Pl1l f { j f( , V:Er:crl:clW.r a`e._, 04 r:'o"ra Sr va...AS 1 • .z ( /U 'l44, ( t, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:29:58 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 _ ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map / l7. Aso.�. ' J V y t � R� f�' 1 . \y r V ,�n�- rl:�..,�.rte .1''/ } - A. -r L /145::4 ,r, ; c 2 N V.-----. .) E.:,_:.-- ,,' —'\.: d) ? j , -,,-.,,, ., 4 7 t.' r 1 } f J Legend • o ' , !? / r ` ' Parcels-H .Z00.f / / / -)/f Contours ./ +. / 6j <r1 w ,} lq fool Contour 2 / I/ J///J f !-___—_ ,. ifyi 50 Fool Contour ♦ / / ///// r _.5 1' Y// /1i/ ~ ..7,77 , �� �� r".. .7 -,_ /A' c. ' F f r Y r ` 7� r � r' f'-. L f u . ° 2 Cj�l4 13 VL..cr:ioi" rer:ur!'wrt Ccrsv,ti, t> j .� {:{Y'HrRr E r f�JQ r FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 03 18:09:27 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 8/3/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• / 3 A . `K �; ,.,_________ -- „,, . {{ a . ,p., 4 , t_______ fr- -1 -,,,,,......,,,, ,,,,, ...-:,--...-,..„.„„., 11 4 '7... :rr.y rrJi' a�'m ; ., r— ... a {'' `" itt Legend • Selected Features 0. " ' r Township Lines r JC Roads r . - - -'" #x�°�. A Parcels-H ct _ I — Fa 't A. 71-;47,',,-:7,r M2011 Aerial Photos — -- --, >' - '"° 1 r *,t, y � • ' , I r� _k fffr `~ t .7,:.ax _ -- .'-' ' , '.- :-.. -;::, ..' ' 1+, /ert,',. . '14:.:4--..;.-- ( i . .4 ,+ ; ' Bentley PI P ZT Li ar:ru:cd FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness orvalidity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Aug 06 09:30:47 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 8/6/2012 0 0 k t i o 7o ,,- (4* , ° JEFFERSON COUNTY ' ,.4 " DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - " • 621 •Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 ITEM ' 360/379-4450. 800/831-2678.360/379 4451 Fax LC��; w.. # 1 Pre-Application Conference ems _._ The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. NAME: North Olympic Salmon Coalition MAILING ADDRESS: 205B West Patison St . , Port Hadlock, WA 98339 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (WORK) 360-379-8051 REPRESENTATIVE: Kevin Long MAILING ADDRESS: Same as above TELEPHONE: (HOME) 360-301-9251 (WORK) 360-379-8051 1 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity,showing a fsall n r( I a. Vicinity sketch; n1l ./ b. North arrow and scale; i L j c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; I- d. Means of ingress and egress; ' JUL 2 6 2012 e. Property/lot drainage; f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; I � g. Location of utility easements; and JEFFERSON COUNTY h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 1 I Property Description General Location: Along Discovery Bay, from Cemetery Rd. along Old Gardiner Rd. , continuing south along US 101 to approximately the intersection with East Uncas Rd. LOG ITEM Legal Description(from Property Tax Statement) / P __.1122—. 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): Total Acreage: Zone: % Lot Coverage: Applicant: ❑ Owner ❑ Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description Removal of a portion of water line, and re-construction in a new alignment; relocation of a section of the Olympic Discovery Trail; restoration of the Maynard shoreline Property Owner(name and mailing address): Various - see property ownership depicted on site plan/vicinity map , and attached table Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. 7/`4-s//C (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. (LANDOWNER SIGNATURE) (DATE) PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 2 Property Ownership— NOSC Project ii I $ O aU rc i mm �a p �t a I Ilbo I Cd 9 IVI g av NumberI Owl i 1 VI } aili1 Adress II,,,�� IIgII 964510002 Pederson,Jennifer,Jeffrey, 2160 Quimper Place Karen/Susan Port Townsend,WA 98368-7307 902242005 WDFW State of Washington Fish&Wildlife 964516903 Real Estate Services Division 964516003 600 Capitol Way N., 902231018 Olympia,WA 98501-1076 902231004 902231017 Jafay, Kurt PO Box 1048 Carlsborg,WA 98324-1048 964516004 Johnson,Thomas& 325 E.Washington St.,#179 Kirchner, Betty Sequim,WA 98382-3488 902231016 MJ AJ, LLC PO Box 930 Chimacum,WA 98325-0930 902231010 Blessing, Karen PO Box 1491 Port Townsend,WA 98368-0044 902243024 Sea-Kota Inc 2183 Crescent Beach Rd. Port Angeles,WA 98363-8703 902233012 Tooker, Dorothea 1215 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368-6620 902243014 Schmidt, Carl& Miyo 282624 US Highway 101 902243010 Port Townsend,WA 98368-9334 902243013 902243016 Moa,Walter&Gail 154 State Route 20 Port Townsend, WA 98368-9311 902243015 Andrew,James G. 6150 Old Gardiner Rd. Port Townsend,WA 98368-9779 964509901 Brown, Lucille M. (trust) c/o Dorothy Hopkins PO Box 927 Chimacum,WA 98325-0927 964509906 Keister Living Trust c/o Gary and Susan Keister 6156 Old Gardiner Rd. Port Townsend,WA 98368-9779 LOG ITEM v Hof tX ■ JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR OFFICE USg SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION RECEIPT #P77-4- 615 Sheridan, Port Townsend, Wa. 206-385-9444 AMT. PD. '41-0 DATE .M .3 OWNER NAME ML C VG Gptalt-lS of RECEIVED MAILING ADDRESS I C8 1^ortEsr � p JUL JUL 0 8 1993 S c2 tom- , wa 8 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTERv PHONE C c 3 — 717 C CT ,a SITE ADDRESS (Directions) Discotit .13,q,•, a °i 7 at ( LUG MAP) H , LUG sTE IN TYPE OF STRUCTURE (3Cb Cr41t.5 TYPE OF WORK 0, NEW 6wrlsne is i�), „ ) 2- REPAIR ...L1.L.,w, PARTIAL (tank or drainfield) COMPLETE m • tt n Number of Bedrooms 1/4 c Basement yes / no Site Size 16 t asres Previous evaluation l, yes no Water Source private t/ public drilled well dug well other, - ' N ATTACH SOILS INFORMATION TYPE OF SYSTEM .5A17 -(...44.Y50 Goo - .e.o ke .4 I2 Q 4 N 1,. Drainfield Length 4° Drainfield Width 14; Z u r- 'a Trench/Bed Depth 3� Number of Lines v o to = co- Tank Size Z5c gallons Soil type # . Application Rate (3. e. - gal/sq.ft/day t ****************************************************************** c, 0 THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT FALSE INFORMATION WILL NEGATE AND INVALIDATES n THE APPLICATION AND/OR THE SUBSEQUENT PERMIT. THE PROPERTY OWNER cel WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURATE LOCATION OF ALL PROPERTY LINES. z c G�� �3 0 Signature Date / m co co ********** ********* ********************************************** OFFICE USE ONLY (Ies ✓o Cc-xf- bsPrv. a°' 8-3- ),,L► g' ? *t'r14 f' qta►+ 3 1 ke)11 3 Uce C M--7-1?-13 APPROVED PARTIAL IN A� RENEWED RENEWED i ■ I LAYOUT: 001 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOly0iscovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuete DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:22:59 PM 0 A F, 1 I � _� n O l � m I d o Q(� IMe cr O � r,Y O O a • "°a' lb\-\2,1■AllippAilk Q V ' �C 2 ill 1 1 mmwm Z rm. N 41 f -- i Z g 9 Z vNm t0 co m CT W N — Z W 1 CD 7„ O W V J - W N p y N O w N a W N A W N N O p C A P 70 ill (1); A W N p r n CO( (P ( (n co (n m O m* n =, =1 Of f D ` D S ` D m m m m m r O f D ` % f D D m D m D m m m m m m m w m m m m m m m z z m m 4 D z z z z z z z m m m v z o 0 m m z m m m m m Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z Z Z N N R° O - 8 aA O Z N p V2 Z A C E, ..< •ED n N N N CN 7 N n x x C C x m cp R.cn N D D 7 C7 n x x O m C x x x 0 0 m n D C7 O x O D 0 r n EA 0 z K 7 N 0 D r r C 0 r m m m -0 'o r r m m m m O O m m m > > > C7 Z n OOA D > Z Z O n m m O n n N Z N Cn N D x x 0 0 O 0 z f Z C C n C m m D C 7 co O n 03 ril > > tA 30 m co 1 0 SO n N =C 0 Z n O U U A W *,,.. m ..i .„, 0 1 CO r— m ? O (b N (A J A W N N 0 r m k co O co n 7 C1 C U ?7 W N - o N j D c0 co V Cj$ N J O m$ DIo 0 i!-2! i T TTI C)m u T TI TI C)TI TI ) C) ) C)C C) ) ) ) 0 Cn ° 0 0 0 n n C A n n 0 O z m g O O O z z z Z z I 30 30 0 z z z 30 30 -a 30 0 0 1 A x m 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 3 O 0 r O r r r O IQ O r r • r Cn n N N N N Cn N N Cn n cc.,„ n 1 m D O A n n n n n = m m m m 7 o m m m O O v O C _m O m O O 7 C C r .Z O o C C r C r r r r m 0 r C r C m r ml m m m m A D m m m > > > >10 m p D 0 2 ."II .....11 ril Z Z Z f 1 D O O m O r-m 3 X > < z-17 T n to ril m> co n0 LI =MI z O m z 1D T -4 n 0 MIMI! 7. M =NMI '-',-;.:- -., 4. :. . -ri. , „ ,,,,..,-. , --. . ....,0 „ .. -, .„. -,.... . oo Z Z m z' Mb '`. W� Z O f rn "O ,. /o O e Wiz N-,O o� z mom W LAYOUT: G02 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtdineOlyOiscovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:25:25 PM V ) I M ° 0 *7:(1),_ r■ w 0 ) ) II / V III 0 z ■ - �f1 G lm 6) m < K V_) —I —1 -< O c < —1 O —1 13 0 -I W CO .T) C) ml * * * m D N C) W o L/) 13 C .Z7 m Z 0 > m m z 0 1 > r rn O 0 > r r Z O O m > FI mm Z_ G) —I z Z .Z7 W z W 0 O F fn m ° Z r r f+T r�r1 m m r f*1 p O C (n .Z) Tml .Z) m � Z 2 O C D D m m D W CO r = A 0 7 m 2 m m N - _ M 'O = m C7 z ° C z = -< 0 fTl C 0 Z ? ,--n D G —I Z rz'I w .R) m > Ph o r c m m m < --I , , cn M m - m 73 0 5 * \ z z Z m > O A c > X77 m LO r m C) C s m c O Or z 0 z '� r..I m = '�. c 0 3 In C m Z -4 r A �n Ph n-I cn * 0 n 0 r z Z rr1 -1 in x Z W O r m Z fM* r m G) _ A a n n Pg 0 1 1 I I D Co , 1 1 m C= Z m [ I I z J I i 1 I z 1 I O 1 � �, ` I z m > bmTIC) N mR n I I I 4 �o Vim - I 1 I m oaf Uf 1 A I y • w c.” o p 1 1 O I C I I (m� N r 0 'j I i; I 1 0 o 7 m 0 _. * 00Cr1 ?7 o � f m m 0 0 0 0 o N m O D m m W D r m F O 0 = 0 m < 0 S -I -4 CA 2 5 , 0 W Z C C r g O m Z yy O z Z p 0> N N 0 0 m * I,, 0 7 m 2 m p o O < r ee O m W r-i W A z 4 m m 0 m z V m O O O z z Z z zmm m m m mDD rrrx ZF=_=0 0 W mm mmm m * Om mm m°°_°O n 0 00 c)00000 W W D D[> G m o o-0 D =O N Z m-1 0 0 M<z r 3 r" 0 x mrGD *D_m C W W0 0 W* M 0 Z AND 0 -n m -0 r 2 O<noo-1 0 0 Om W r r� r ) x S 0 i x 2y Tin r C d S OOZ oC O0.Z0m o(7,Zxzmz.Dln_<GD02,mx1r_ox7Dmz Npp CrlfC_)T7 ff1/TT)m>c cmC c zz�zO�VmI W�G)O .Z7Z D D D cmCoA000rr*IDDuc�Zm Z cp 3 romAm2c?D0mrcc =0 -,NO3<zz,mm==zmrODZ �zmmo�mmZZ�A�A OZzmD r?225.m(nA 00;z5mz Z�3C) m rODDx<°m:z A�OA mz� G�m�Z-i°O�ymm ZzW 'I G�-O ` mOr �m O < r'�W rDm °� DO f') 0 OW m * '4Z /IT m -1 A� 0 - m >o - -iZ > < O Z z CC Zr m-I �' m (Dj D z Z N D z< r ° C m O L7 n n r /, u M D O r O Z Z Z < Z < C C m G7 G7 3 M > O D m MO i. § 3gpN Q CO m A $.8g° r om mo §”A. m 'yen Egs -v �\�G< �°-(�fn In In NfnNln r%'A 000 C) '4?-9 1 p A V��3 ��7 NmC 0> ) —C) O = =W -i < m 0 Z r, XI 0 *2 m **f*« --vwlntnlny2w4cnc wv-44T.w8rm'z_7gT.vvv�vv V) > D-Di-'1°Az-m=z Ca DAZZamOpccm')OOO=C0=G-)g pOOZCZz 0 mm SZ ?c7C)p OQam=OOr',DDm+1rz0C;KE22, N _-'I7 < m-‹3 �� �Lrrr�co-1 M � oD��z0001 u,m om O�oNOO A Z� Or.:� -DI 0 DO -1 cncn - 0 =k> p° *° < -4PCC) m5 Zm m C ro r2 r2r m0 O zzz -* > mC> CC { i0 y A m r m m Z z 3 n m m A O m N W< D * >> A r r m m M m z 0 r°0 D C W r0 ° NI Z o= m7<m m 2 OZ m = z m -a o m m oz 0 m0 73 m z m z= 0 Z aD m Z o Z O 0 Z ,1 m° r -4 A D O N z > *2 0 C D 777...0 W (p ° D m_ _ 0 MO m N* Z0 m C N 0 ON Ain -' D 0 �0 CN) -1 0 ° ° no ° z r A= m D D FT. D Z rn 0 rA.1� z cn� m m ° o In /yam Z w f r=r1 A v m Zen n d Z D O Z , N 4D = )j,.V� mrn 0 =0 CO m ( ( 1 O c 00 o Z,°M m0 o ?` �3' Z z O m 0 W -o p1cn N sli' N O v N\ In _ 0 M 0 M° m (n Cl)■ mm r 0 = 0� zf = Z >O M0 Z Al o� m Z ? fz W\ cn == -I 0 z = Z T NS O o L \�J\ _�J N M N z Z W ID LAYOUT: CO1 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtreneOlyOiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:27:30 PM V MATCHLINE STA 449+50,SEE SHEET C3 m .-� --- -- -- .,—»1 -- --- N -',' ' ' . -1',12 I';'-,--, ,2 .!,/,' \ Y"-,-;';''\'';‘);,': ', ,,_ .,—, I,,I I i i 41111'''"f N�s�a ' I 1 1`' '� ' Nv t , � r 1 n ! t �� STA 447+84 � ` 0 _ C1C.C➢ ;00 1 I I �ti 1 \ , �k I (i N:� p W \� Al r �i °'.I A c 7 �° ` \ I1 ' 1 ( I/ 1 ,; ,✓ , \ ;� �,, 9 n A' C , .4, .\/t, dTa� :.1,/,..1:11,7;;: s„H‘'' 6 i,\.•)` ' :''le`, ,,,,\IIV\--- :VV.'; ‘., ' r'R'\I'.. )2L-'6 ;' '''' ['Iv i',,J 1 r 1 1 ' itittil ‘ „ , ___,,,,v,‘ „,, . . - , -qv c," ' W. x_93;i� � � �� `� I Ij � ��,, r.;,,,•,,\,s,,,,,,,s,,,,1\,\, ,‘ ___\,___:..,,‘\\,,i,.:, , 1, , . Ft,2 0, 0 ) ', -A71,• _, '',',', A,L.: ',,01'';'"\; : '‘‘''‘ '';';'\ ''V r , . ,„ „, „ , , „ „, ,,,, .\,IA/''''2\A,'" -,'vk\'1-- ‘ \- il, , ,,,,, ill, ,%,,,,,\ IA, 1,r1;1. .,,t,„\ ; ,',,-,-, - ,,,,,,\;,,,'„_„- ),; , , I1 i t y 1r. ° \'\ ti ! �/ jJ oiIl ' 5 ) ,C,_„,A,,t .1,,■-:' . , ,),,, ,,\ \,47_ ',•\,561';'//,,,,,,,,;; 1 ■ t / lf FI areT& "' I C-...ri i fi 1.f 7; ...av, � ! 1 1 j � LL ( D .Q o :v: �, IN / to ! v, r� ��\ ,I I4 V i / �I,. O Z S \(' - 'r- ° Y a ,. , '� J t/. ( `•',;ti c C 4.l L 4 �' �� i4) ;r1', / , , /, iiii,,,,,,/,,,,,,% ,,\, ,, , i -, ,,,. 3 lei / i � 1 �l r v , 'I it, j � ' ✓ • — '_ aS ' �iç /i1 /!(1 1 \.V11 f 1, z ,1. P �6 ' ' %la =_ - 11 /o �` © `MJ _____;d; z Fl , ,,,,), Li'l,',,, ,•,,,,:i,,,/,//,/,-;,/,,, m /��✓ EPA; j , 0 'T., , ;.i"),,,r'///1,4),Ir',,,,_:, r'r _ '):/":r '7, ,-.. y,/),r;')/, Ar:r/4:4,r, irr" r r,- ,--,) rfr,' i ...._,... ,,sl \ i;\..-- `: ,;\ ■ co mo 2 m n / ' / I \ --7 I a irh Z •'' /// !; fr / o - I O r.-�// /�i' ���i^--' 1, _ 1 �i �3� -- {/ / . '/,/ I \ co 1c' ° 1n Ili , �I j m / -� NJ :f 'CI 1! : , ,( ii, ,, 1,1,,,, i . IL - a I D -_ � -•STA 422+96 J� I Y) I Z >< m Cr p � -�,,,,,,:::,,,\ ` ,.:../r I 4. —— —'-MATCHLINE_I ° f" I_—_�. ° F .' O c Z z 5o-) E STA 436+00,SEE BELOW z X I� : f'l rrl D T, - P3 D D z ,, . . ,_„,,,, / MP o °m 1 I ,� y D Zy I jI `! , m Z N Z m C o -I j n o Wm ° 11D o z ` I LAYOUT: CO2 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wt rlineOIyDiscovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:29:13 PM 0 m 4" .,,,x .,\,,, ‘,\\_, o o /e1. * \ / �3 ,4 y6 30, 31 � # 72 e l 2/0 Li iT� �pc\ \ 0� � ` ^ % ate o z ) •\\ vAy \ � 08. ��� z v . _ � /2 / / /t /it ,,\ � � ; p A --- 1' ) r/'I l' it A/V t r 8 ,I, r 7 1, ral ,1- ,,, 4.,,, rA ----......"" '- ( , ( / '�; ,;a f/` l � &4 \ I '''\ , S I � Pr 2id 4 A �c, A ;`� el , 1 i ) ? „� o /� I , 9 i.(ls i..,..1.k,e.r) / 1 (1 1 1" .,,L , \,,,\\ lolt!ri III Y 11 I — .,, , \ /r 1', r•---,___/_ ' ,•, - i; R; 6 ✓ ' , 1 a ' i' %/ N I jif ° ,; � E 5 r m // .„./t,_ ttY , N m 1 ° „ f I v ;i 0 i'0.;"'` ),/ ,i' ',-71_ A'7//' 1 j? il I'''' z \ N ' ' I \ 1°9,m // �d \\ ,,, /�., F+ -, I �, I� ' _ I rz / _°"'`,,,A' %.6•N \ \ i LI 2 i > is - r i N-. �i `d \' c O z � ' - .5. \� A c A " �' air y ��< m D ,(t i3 \i 5 1 C � a ti � , \ /z / o a� 'VP° \ Cn i / / 7 \ 111 .,e. \ \,(i. :? 8.` \ \ w0 m u, 7 zr, ..,. ,' -. '0%, ,sv\ , 0 -\\ \\ ,-,----,.._ , m Z � ., C CO r Z N O co ., z p E .—O Z `QF�C•�` ' m i n .s. n �C3 °� Am ° N 410 N oz z A a. LAYOUT: CO3 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:30:17 PM MATCHLINE STA 457+50,SEE ABOVE N ——— -- --777'1 i -T�7,�-- --- s -' �/ ti 5E 1A0• f, 11 � I I ' I�„ r; *w I i ���Ib 46+�� S p�, � II ii I� I Ti �� y IL a 1 l �o ire,' = \ y � ¢\,.\\ ',,,,,, ,y.:_;- i m _ T Gi \ N f' T r F ; l wo w> ° �,y 1 T II �/air ��� ,,..,1:, 8 1 c,„ 2 i :'!--?.'2' c\---,!”; r 1 li !! 1 i.:',°\'‘ :,:\ '41 ','!!':',':_'- , : ,!(:\,:: /,,:r.! W i ., !I i,„ ,, , 1' --. :i-,,;,,,,\,'i,,‘,,,1r,,.,,,I,,,i,fl,'!,11i,,,1 I s1 ,,.1 4i.xi::i'.:,�_ � � \ ''---,,i-i,s 1\)--','.,,1,4-,.,„,',.‘.,,i„',‘„11l11 � b ) ,\ ,,,,,,,,,,:,,1i,,ili,i,ii,,,,ii,1y'5'tt.,',,,,,,'",,rC',,11,i1,1,'.,11;,!,,;1,11i(1,.' 0*A, \ ‘ ,, , ,i ";,-' ,,',\1 t i 1r i1 l t i',,,( (. I, 1 ,_, _,-:.-,- , 1 ,i . . \ . ,1 ' ;; I ' :, . —,&R ;--.41141/1!/;;: _ : !,:,! 1 : ,, ,;\,1,,,, ,,, l,_: if(;011,4/411 \\ ': !!:, ,. )::\) 1 [!,:I I 1)\ii1,1:'!';'114''' _7'\ i itc ' ,f,1( ‘''.'); / /i: iII,Iri) ', ---) ',„ ,..-' i fi T , 41,1;„,o,H1p, ti Iii IrI t 1 �,. N s I S } I, _ z it r�--I--:-4,;l I — �,�J o - ' , / I 1 !z '1(. [,[1.,[1.14;[,--,[-; M I 11 1' �,� 1, X111` IT � 1 X1;1 , 13 1,1 l ,, izli ' ' '-'r ---' '''' / 1 i Ti II[,.,[[;4[4'[:,,,,f,. L„ ' II t i I m II, } I o IIr .1 !!�a ' , j Il I� 1 ga !A N' ) :[ I i ! ([111,44.1\\. v CSTA 447+84 I U ', 0 -I \ ' ' 1 :I i ', r'll'':,1„'',) ' **)' i'll'''''''\ ''''' {,( li,,,,,,y,',,,,,,;;„.,f, '- ' ' ' ' '1, .1 ' 1 8( 0,,,tr'it); .:\.,,, ' :'' / : ,''II\/,''I 1'A;i i t ,111;;1,'''''I''''')'11':1!'''!;f::::: z --`� ,!�r _ � ,111 `11 t `, z MATCHLINE STA 446+00,SEE SHEET Cl _—_ ti 44 '' -:TCHLINE STA 457+50 SEE BELOW —— N —I m 7J m 4 II3 la 111 RI 4t 0 a . Cl V/ c_n D m co n r O Z 0 3 m n MZ o iy,� 0 M I� 0 N N V/ m m 70 n m -- ,,00ff�, �'.�"''t, m o o O 0 to 0) O0 I r P o D D 0 e r- o ° ° z y z CA z Z Ti 5 .ZJ Z w C 1n m 0 m rn= o _n W mz z r o 40 LAYOUT: C04 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99SYCS\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:31:11 PM V S 0 0 N DRIM'M BY ma BERMS DIWAN BY BILL OMENS rr 1 1 AR - 1 E i li 1 n. / g 14 �,•c '° l� A -a i €i -- 4 r ,„i, II q- ill -PMM re PM g m ::zi , 1,1 K m f9piy 3 �� ::.i• 0 o m x00 0 4 s �- t i X 1 '--IO' £ R a > LI- ,.- [ w g 0 ..-----.-' , -- gl gl -.7 z 0 — 0 f— s —1 ap \ ‘‘\ o € m > Z ' NZ mz*i a n 8 �"�Qx i g ` B a m r m yq `. i m. W A O 1 �i”" PM,Sg t �Y2YYY ,`. S 0 F vJ O m 9 Qz- �1 5 EE i '< r a J I 4 s's 2— qi i Itilr4 CI ‘. li 456w 1 3 ; 2 P tWe. 1 z 99 ----• 4 s ° It b $ Y u bi N 'f A' . IBS _ 111 (4 P. IR � $s °� �g �� � §90�41�W q i 11 12i a 3 WO § h 3 11; - i _ 11 ` $ti r 11 5 n dill . i f 1 I g g z 1 1 i P K MAW M:UM CYFOBU MOM USA CYFOPD r :'lma I , Pa Pi N t 4 N. 0 A B N ' .'' — —ii- <ream I t /6 (7 i O * 4.I V 0 _I o 4. y z ii 0 m o Z m ri -BEENOAE2 , 1-- 1 1 I 1 $ II of 0 0 's 2 Z m r" 3 3 3 O v z 1 A X/ ' PI 3 w r 111 I C gO0 0� M / \� EL i 1 !-P MIN. .f s / \ Irir 4 in N el v I B B N, -.=_/ z —I " 111 f N m 3 y; I 1m■mS CI -ci 333 1; Yp si El CI n ��� p IS v ill A�°�� $ g $11 i 11 1 i y in t € §r 0 O co ri! i6 i 9,11 l& 4 e g $ ' g � s Cif Z 73 e taw,@pi 1 v $g I Lpgjg I n s Q $ J X3'4 3 1!!" �_ ��4 g ilig Jt oe A i IV gi „= o o z LAYOUT: W-01 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOl yOiecovTroll\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:33:27 PM V MATCHLINE STA 444+75, SEE ABOVE T y 1a 1 �\ ti— a �f �, J � ( j 11 k �, ' l �� u N x aI I ! � m A l e A A U A ,I i , o °/A Y ____ __—' a W. I A 1 ' IN 0„ l S TART■M.P. •1.8 1 � _a o o A A � h '73 VI td 'o A x __ I ■ O c IA i _ 11 O _Il s m ` O m P , m D z II z , i Z O A A t r'[IA - TI � -- A � _0- 1;— Um, �o o ,t d i / �. I f ( 5 39.2' z I )0 N I i , n S c l ` m r `E' 1.•,',.°'� � 1I f I o n m pP W ■ � A A , rZ'T 2 To \ � i O j ■ f W A i� > (n D n° ° 2° r Ir r� ? f I pp1 N _ IA i 1 C 1 m 1' 0 / I �. I: o * A I > 4. L © a I o o o A I 'o m A , CD W I 38.6' O o , �A , " '\ c , o h I s :' � '©� O " '''),,,//� -cvr m,' A II; e L � / yJ�e \\\ , -^„ '.� � I, . - � x , e' 7 rn 4 , � T a �o � � �. -- ;�\ \ r� � ,, \) \ 1 I f o r • \\ 1 I ; \ ,v �, /, 1 r ®A R \ � � ,, v i 1Tv—,\ ,0-,, I r s \r, � ji r - 1 2) A . ` "0�\ ;1 ,V,:‘ ,�f I� A ■ �_ __ A� 3 i6 1 ): 7� a� as�\V \i I 3't � a ,A aA�� h - o 'a \ 1`,' H �O d I A � I,,I �� I :�� x a TRAI L- o z ENTER R.O.W.'II I \X A A \ M.P.281.86,60LT 3 x e� ,A \� 'R. CO I , I A i A I gIi' ..moo t�� Ai 1 q i � m `p`' vn '/ I ;. A `\ /1� A A I r, m 2 _ _ �' _ 1 ; MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET W2 '-'' .„,, a'1 �,,; I — _ C_j.a < - MATCHLINE STA 444+75, BEE BELOW r^ r3 m C0— Ow ) rn N m> D =0 3 z 0 30 z2r -t_ Z D D mco 0rnm zgl) OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO GO O z c0 W v O> N A W N O l0 OD V 01 [T A W N //� r W m D m O, XD W Z W Oi m W f7 (Nv C7 Oa 3 Os c Oa G. Vi O�OA �n ,�*7An rPr1 h n UU 3 TI U3 Z r3e z A Ne 30 nCD A T �u Ph �- �m0 r 3 ic„. O v; ao (n D r z z D O m �v fie-' ®.: m �vzr'�rl °z Nz--1 = -1 rmi m °c Vz1 C m� z < mN 0 r 0 om� Ao ,Om 0 m o m a m G, o 0U) O O K rr+7 :ri_lt 0 -n m�*1 O C Z Z 1 R";),(,),,,,0:(nrn,u,r7,, 0O, Dz0, m N X N Tri N m PN m E m N E C7r Z r m Q Csr .Z1 fn O ��D y O N r fm r N X �L Z N to 1 C?1 0 L) r C7 rrI G) 1- (n 2 O D c mm a � 02 r..rr Z * D �D� -1 m (nW m O OORR i1 1T1� m T OC)O r x oh x Co Phr Z Z7 C � II � Dxij m m c N my m rD N _ v l J el \\ 16.),,,,_:) O -0 -0 C7 z r-x to r^ N Co 000_0120 m r D Z Si) m U zo mz 0 O Z m m x m (11:1 z U) on n O� z m m Z A z� NW ®p 2 4m > Z C-) c o o 0 r'ill J= !--0 DZ z (i10 D� 4 6 j m o v W' LAYOUT: W-02 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY raemuste DATE Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:36:40 PM V MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET WI N i A 1 ,I SEE ABOVE A MATCHLINE STA 436+75,S „ a I � �� 9AIL �� �.• °c '` 3 38.5' ��, Ia$ N A TRAIL- o A I 1 I I I,„I I I ` — ., CULVERT CROSSING, A I SEE DETAIL IL BEL OW :: i � A I�, e 39.7 1 M.P..P.287.78 ,II I� I k` � : \ A I• \■ I I .281.75 I I '� c \\'-- � 1�I a I I 6, ; II 1 ' _ o ��', aI '� CI jnzg x I m. I 'i o A x o `z 1 ;I ' l ' �A ' l A c m �.. : '1 ii i i I% Ic' I w / ,:, s,,,t"o � 13I J' A I , k 1 0y. I I I ' ;I C ��I - \,t ell - n • ,. Iw ( 'i I �— ' I _ I �? A e C° 1 I ; 1 I (( t . 'WA / ■ 1 �SP • �^ ■to ' , I ( ( g m ' , A I - o < o I (g )4 I —v I/1' I 1 I� � O A� ° I r vi, i I _ N O mm IA i � o A I - / m r o JO 0 1 J �'1.))11) � p x i A i o �m C O Z II f II ' , N O r / / I O 1 _ 0 O N I A -(, m r i C m La ^ I A A 0 O� 7 D jl O \\\'\,, ,:>il,I: / . , ar�r LY \ v ;� ! 1 k;1A; II I ,xai. i 4:1,. W1‘4 i 4-'', II�y A — a iIji . I ',,, •. ,\ II I 1 r I N�� ^1 �� I 7�f A I '1 I r '�' I ,/i' A I* 1 a_ oJ4 I I'I ;// ill 1 r, i I p I - -/� t TRAIL- µ . I a J /� 11 IL —I / ° „"'" CULVERT CROSSING ,' •I / l �� d I ' IG -�4�� 1, r %,i\ t AIy SEE DETAIL BELOW a ;�� N b q, [�- �.• M.P.281.72 gi°s I .......11 1.r,,,,,,1i.,-, ,-...,71;;;\",,r2 I\'''• I ' ;1:,:qd:--, I, , . __,„ . 1 1,, , '� i II n \� k''', /!.i , i1 '--,1 • �,' 1 ;; �,i T �I A - �, / � 9, ,4 Y I I�' � �\ _ li ,I I II ) I T I I 11' ti I 1 138.9' iI ■ 8 2= RI t 1 z ,- _221_2_11[ ;\/!,! i '' I ,1 1 / , ill I ,f;1: !IL '' 1 ;If i ; 441 I ' ' ,_ ' I VI/ / ! ' I I; , ;"1---- ii i ��.LIyI � it 11'l �� / iL" T, m 1;1 I III �> — _;�r Imo_ �, a CFI/.la , i MATCHLINE STA 436+75,SEE BELOW < xi 3 STA 432+75�SE MET 3 L j m n tril 3.w m D 5o AZ v Z n Z AO�O ` ' I I 0 3o 0CAD " O z -1r n° o -I F �' { O p X _ v Z -0 71 ,//� 0 0 Z ° Z o A Q r < r G n • I - f mN* zmN Z OOOOOOOOO�° OOOOOO e€ O 8 /w > m r 1 1 — > �m x, ;-D m _. p, .Z7 T Oo co z 00 —' co I—co CO N 0 0)s Oi C O� Cl) 0 �2 Z A mom` AI'10 D - m x x p Drn m O . O ,..,-• z rr,n m—I o // AEON �-1 TAZ� r- m W O m O (n 0 N W N; 0 m A zO C m �hr zm oz- cn NH Z ? r w o mo < z m� z < A m < f7N Cl Q r 1 ,�."' �O �O� A v zv m A °vpi O o O r= D0D rn O I —/ O� m m A O x N 3 N x °�p Z° N TI X N m N m M- m L m 3\ UI 0 -c D •• A Z -, m m (n r m Z r r N N m 0 ` rr'I Z M �v Ch oD cAZ D p z p 0 c» p I— �z 011 71 No �mcm o m 0 c_ m _ �GC N tn2 D D TI Dm wW x1N 11 om r-rm z * D �D2 m N� Z O ITI2 p H 00 N —I lD O O °f2f**11 N m Z'J r C) A Z r 2 N N ° O o 0 0 < N I AZ o m U) N O O.ZD7 z m m m D z ---1 0m om D Z ° 0 Z C m z N m° C 0 D Z C _ F D Z z G ao D m �p j (7 Si"z Z m W o ° ■ I LAYOUT: W-03 PATH: U:\Brom\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:39:50 PM 0 y.�1�r�'' ', s'IX ZM 133HS 33S `SL+ZEt V.S 3NI1H3IVW N7 _ _ ice, _ R,I---_� �,. GIN --r ° l ; I ` AgL* 8 Ili, : , i I� , d OS -i E I �l iJ , \ J , , ,/ p� C c j Dr \ � \\\ \\\ \ \ Ill 1 I',1I D� " \T7V' , 1jl N ?,/C.X.\r/II 'Cz 12 r ‘\ ‘I\ lit,, .0 \' \ \ J ',' .{, ' ,■ F 0 i r I1 S 'r , l ;I 1 t, I 1 11 I LT, I �' o x NfY A'ni 1 in o ,� )/ l, �' \ �-►1 n l■ �i f ,-I ' 0 ,to IAI+II' i!4 o 2 g ..,/ , .., , --5,;4 ,,,,, ,, ill oi,11& ��I� �� rn ll I C 35.E 1. l I' J o • N 5S 1� ( I \' I 1 _ I I 1 y ( I1 ��a, = 4 l I a I,' ') � I , ifs / I W A O S ' 1i:itfvL' O I' r ' 1 I i n - 4 t o m `� III Iy 1 i ; . i ; I �( ,� L i \ 1 ' 1, \ \ E ri \ , \ ' 11, 'I 1, rn r L j \ , 1 --74 iT i I 1.! )9 I - s � \ \' ,' 1 0 \ �i 1 IA1_ , r 1' ' I ) '(I II i 7ti 4*)8'441 � yv,A 1 11 I "' A ' ' �L I ■ y \ A,8� ` *S\ \� A , ��1. ; 11 I , 1 �,,( EI to 1 I' m \ l 1 I x i�.ar'ss��'d'w ;'; )I :it i I/I l �� ` l IIVM NI�J38 i ' : m m rn 1 l �I 7 r emivi / -, '/// / /i;Si w -1 l (, 1 I 1 ,''� eF 4P ,� 1I ►I- 1 I i ' � `\ 'm o ►'' L 1 i � l:g1� !ill ' I Ii-nan , ■■ J■` I LL ' I' ■SL Z I I/ 1 1 L—--a- 0 ; MATCHLINE,SEE SHEET W4 o <_ O o r A• A7) Z w f) > .'0 N mr v > 3 = 0z M Gzy 3 C _1 n z Z r �_ 0 z y mCp pmm Z OOO OO OOOOO OOOOOO GO O Z v In z rn m .W� -am-o in D m m rn co co zp co rn co mo. o N p co , N m Zrn g t . r m n < mM rn Co p _ 0 mc--< ,� Ao_< m z m x cn p m m m , Cy zp 0 M 4t� m ��zm oz mnm Z m W c ° c z m PA' o m m c ��' C] r ;i` r- z Z m 2 v z 0 m C O ( Z m 0 m GD Z O -I m r n m --i m Po• ONE ;;So 1c\ M m m O p x ° pN O 3 O �+1 x mgt 0 I— m z ` ANN N° n-Iy to O N TI to r m DTI x - x m 0 " �r Z Q m O Z r Z rr N * to m� 0 M Lis° IA r^m z'n3 D c�1 —I m 0 3 r I�* m Z 2 Z r m cnS D .... O CII in rWm °z �D G1 X p W rrl t0 0 �y _� jmj o r> °c'° cn r� W °: c Co N 1°�, m o •• nrI 7C7 Co 0 1 E ! 5 ,v°o mA =irrr�lI m A �� z A m n °�1 C) o N N H Z r 0 m m ° O m N W r D Z m N �Z (C-) Z Op �� _m r, 0 z (n 0> z ITI G'y m �D z cn—I � t { p° 0`) �� EAp nZ Z W T$ Z o ICI LAYOUT: W-04 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlinsOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:40:49 PM V m ...ft.....5 e. N Tj SEE SHEET f :1J:7,, r '' w3 ' Y ////// / 1 O� !: / O'/ � ' t 1 i /: �; . CD J/ , .�/ ;;/ � �V, i 1 / '11� ;l /% �,//1 r' f � mF 5 1i / r I O. I 1/I I , , ) ) \'''' / 41 ji 1 I I', ;/147,,, , W w W. 4r - r /W / i�N �/! ,K / w ° ';',',7, ,,,, „, , ., co , , ,...-. , , , 8 4111%3 i /, 7;-1 � � / ' ' � ■ / m l H / %S / ,// _) `� � ° ,! © P . / \ �m r ka 3 a s2' 8 n ; ,;. z m - .�. --- _1 ti /.-. -50_N0J �' rn D- Fl / o *Xi m N i w DD / ,' C' CA ^1 H CD = nz �, m 5 --�-' • O Z .;,o D , z -I I- _ r �. 1 0 z g D mcN pmrrl Z OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO OO O Z > vw0 Za-w D r - '3Ex) -1 m19 m n rn m Cr xo T z w - w mw 8 N C) w „c - rn ca Cl)) _ �m7 7//��t�J�# 'V4 m �-mw-w �� A o� m W z Cn *1 rn �' � co w� Z ? c, ° Z p m ~ - m › z_, pZ y i.,,/,) Z ,z r- n m s p < Z C mz, -1 o -t < m m < �N n G r jp 0 Zmv� 73 p z0� 0 v m p m A c�+7,in O O rD 7 p C Z z Fii� pNfA pp Zp m w �7 X N T w iw In ; Z v� r m o Mx,m N� ��D y o N m x x r1 rri`z Z M ,per Nm� O D c-DZ D GZ"> Z ° C7 D w NS D O wfl m Np �c� m 3 C^ z z C^ -I-� 1ef m II z :DPP z D D i p p m m w W m ^1CNi oTA pn° F °: A Cp ° mz fA Z C II °o a_: �x• � m x) 4D m x, N m N y °° pCq�r�( __-O fTl p 1+'I z .T7 .Z) fTl r (7 f [ f ° cwt m� ?�• 2 w m ° N m (°/1 m D� �. n O N 20 Cmi �'I w r w r F O rn ID 76TI° O w H li_� Z—I GS -<27 Z n Z n C0 c-,< °° O _ _—I r =O >Z Z 40 T o Z m0 LAYOUT: W-05 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline0ly0iscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY raemuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:47:08 PM V ; . ,.., &JAW 0 '''.....--------■____. i ,; ,; \ ti,f,r; ; TfcsTA8+s SEB (�, ' ) lr�SEE i \) 1 il ;. -,1/ , ; :, i., 1 1 f / ;l , ; � � � � =��I� 1 tv / Ike J j n '� ,% l ,, , ;' j l 1• 1 o � ! o � ��, ! ! ' / I D o , %'/ o I-I // 33-1/ �i %r1 1` / ' o N i �/:, , ,, , , 9. g r o i • ' 1 r rn =- 'C�� / / Z4 w •/'. o ,,,/ cD _ i ' c o I I S ) o a 0 W � �I t N D c.° V � i /, '`� m _ - _ 'rot 4 ',. \---. /;,/,; 1� �� _ _ o _ �� / ��' \ II' \a I !/ - , - � :o ,M P z ■ I �° rn � "„: ,,, �� �< w D I D IN N o N i e C �,� \ 'at 1 A ,h; I �' e ow t m , o I N 2r 1 .� P M ,� 1 D Y I m i8g 1 ` �1 1 1 r U o � \s, . M E ! \ : , I 1 i,, ;• • = 0 z , \ \ , y 0 d1 is �1-34S33S S / ",\\....--•3 054.84 314 1 -- 9M 13 —Mp393 S` -0(.0 Z�N m 0000000000 000000 00 0 z 0 D m 3 W O -1�-o m T. z' os xo xo z o o D a rr,T 9 O N 8 0) 0) c al t/1, n --, Z7 r`rl� ,, n < n 0) W 2, t7 C) O iNv� o x ^; Z O O :"{(� m?,:), m a x 7c �l N Ti Z rT Z D M3 C"t-y m/1 rw m��� � N m Z V; c.., x c 0 D r wc7 n m Cm) O '" -0 2 ZO C ry ' �2Zm OZ fw Z O n O < O Z mO C mT C) �1 -nib O Q r //t,e 4t z,41-0F AO mom O m O m O p O ON O ° 3 D x Op z c, '— Z co C 0 n y O r �n T N r m D�L X ` X fp*i 0 r F.,* Z r m O �YA Nmx,in CP OD C-0 Z y D0 Z ; M C7 cZi ,-m 2 -I zi -1 D vl (O/IS 0 m —i i /� c m Z en D c�7 --� m G) `L x O� m lA Z 2 Z r m c II Ing rCpm O =_i r p p r<rl r^ (nW CO W �..i !®s� Al N II O m B n Z D x CDDC Z O- � 2 O� D O m Z CO) C) N O A N > O Z O .s II p O r 2rrr11 to m A x Z -1 m- N C' N m O O i,Q.,.. -'N° �D OWN m N N Z m 0 ; r D�,I.v:\\)-3 'C O V) .Z7� Z2O (m7 < W m O N rm O N Z. m Z m 0 mo Z x m �� �Dz Z H il i�_ v t71 W o z LAYOUT: W-06 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WMIneOlyOiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED 8Y: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 5:48:19 PM dW V 3N1.�H01 'c 9 9Z .d*S d •••••••••••••• MATCHLINE STA 4+00,SEE SHEET W5 7 m �V il y> �, my Aj I I pm�Cm) S.' lit � i �1 G�j 0 0 � r \ �Zrnr x D \ f ellff I �m�1 ' '' Zil r-.- ' ' \\ '','\ -I\ \'‘,\t 00 0 1 ' " �\ , I I ��.I / �\\ I o' \ � \ � 1 ) �� �� f p L� 1i ' \,0 0 ) Z 1; '' r1 1 t �' Z \\ r I I �I nl� < 1 \ ��'� v , I I� � �. ® I u . o A 1.k/, ''' A,' '° er ft - �� id/ � I a �, � - - 1 I \ '' I. ' $ III , ��� l I ',A, > C sP4 25 \�' ro r^ �Y I', C o z �` 4Aihit)&st's I �� �Pi I�� o� I �� 'k7 ' < < ��� �', 1 \� I Iii' 1 :.I t A I I III r „:, 1 II m N \ I I: Ill ryi r ' ti Y '` � � c A 1 ~Da I 1 45 fm � ,! °a' I I _ f> D Isi I I A 2' / 1 I t �., 0, � mod 1 1 co U -/ 4 /- a I 9 N o ; a� I `\Z k .,. v X �-I I I'; v , 1 " m � � ; ,s iIl a l� ''/ I + >� oNO r 3 I J I 3* , 0 -1 ,;� �— I _- I I_• ,r M o m �;�` - ' O < z 1 '� 7J r3 yJ \ I n m ca Mme ' 0O I11 I j ' 1 ��1 �� � � < �� ; mr �.._,.. - � _ �, J m. I II r;. i ® mcnow i 1 2 A Z _ _ I i A 9 I 1i o: II 8°'' l, /-- 3n F� 38.19 ��r'r1t� -D ;�I I z °: {� ° z I \ D, ,i,Z �O ' f /I , ( �� 1 A ' I mA�' I j Sf„ ,,1, ,!,� ;' �, ` N MATCHLINE STA 479+25,SEE BELOW / j I /// MATCh4.^►E 87144-4,-4L.- ;i I/ Y . /� �� �r �s, See SHEET` W ^' J m 0000000000 000000 00 0 C G MN° zmm Z Z 1 aml c p -I m 0 m CO. 70 a� CO 00 z CO c- co r co C) rJ C) co� as c a) CO 73 N A M 7c Am_ < , x xa CD) Gm') O N, v N. n' Z O�v �0 m� m p 7c TI 2nm Z Z D Al 00 T mNNN ANON m Z V2 m co c D r r P1 CO P1 .� -o Nf) Z C D'IZ O x Nz Z m m m v m < Z W mx) 0 Z .Z1 rr1 m0 +.4.1 a -_I v m z 0 m C v 0 m 0 -� frr^1 () i1 n'RI O r ,;t! 0VlA 0O -IC v m N O 0 fO*�N 0 3 0 3 i7 �r Z C Z z RCN <v D AvA (/� 2 �1 4 N r m -n D f m m m r m�L Z r m -0 w v>G. ��D Z �1 v Z r=–t N N < C)� R1 Nf�1m zp� nm� m o * 3 m m z = z 1- N inx 0 s►. C c II (nv r 0o m p 3 4Dr G) m m N CO m CO TI mN II pm rrp Z x Z co 2 W rp+1 mC f/� O P ON m'� OOD N m S 3 N 0 C N -1 m0 Z 0 id s. H ° m:D N m A A x z �1 m N C) In > 0 O c r- 0 m -i 0 M T o O ws*,.- °NN mD Zr= m m W N 0 DrD 0 Op�pp�y -0 N D *L C < m m m 00 �0 _m CD 0 6 , ” N zv 0> 1 m O 0 z m �Dz —I G0 .;--f Op m 0 m 7` y z 0 77 Z 7 , zm D� �D r Z D C i C-< 0 4© cm� r F 50 o �� N= O 4° c� o� z LAYOUT: W-07 PATH: U:\Brem\Protects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrIIneOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuete DATE: Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:49:16 PM V ow s �� VIS 3Nj1H-1-", ess d M 3H 11-9 1 .�- / \. \ \ ,, . . �) 1 0� 1 j 01 7 ti � ;p ci ' \ 0 1 t �� z D M ) -1,, r X44 �I �i� ' ''' \ , E''', m A e ��� 38.4' °° _ m _ z A \ ,�I I,,i, o x Si?, 4 \ �� � � �� 0 0 › xi; ,I N Z w 1 t .. I III ': ,' _ z �' 0 . I, II n O O Z7 z O I I O I, ii ' II 0 I�,, f0 a' I � 1 I m; Q O � 1 N � D � 1 ��, I , A S r (1 W A Om � \ I it p z I O 1 1 I ' / /* m z off' �� , 4" 0 �'' �� I i M.P.282.36 I. , \ -___-ei i D I \ -4 O A s,,�>� I �C I $1 , N m D 1 .(.1W1 N C I r N � �. O �_ ITa v N I I i �' rl F , �I€0 1' • w �'I / i� 0 ! I -,1I I ' i� , I �f, I . 1 i ter; 1'� I 39.7' :7 j ,r I'l.; i : I' I �I h i l' � o�'I 39' O Z ! II/ O• 4/ 1�. F n " i ' ' g z0 ) / II S r p h j� I !t1 :l a� / �1 �)C CS) I I ii I C l4�f 1 i R II I! ,,,/,,j� `)� i_ d r ` i II! D zy �__j� 1 l pzl��� ,,`,' MgTCH� ` m> m", >;''t1;'41' ENE S o MATCHLIN s A_ N ) ` Tq 47 +po 0,3E■ 2 3 A 465+fig �-s �,� E Be,pj.V 0 z Z> �_ 0 Z ��,N Z7, m 0000000000 000000 00 0 Z mm Z g. > A W A, -1-1 m D a, 7o CP co co z co D co r co 0 NNN�� C7 a, , . J a, Z as V) N^ O�°� �cmi� mom° m O a' go x TI .coif Tl z .3� z D ^' nc') z `J -0 m m N -I f -0 w N K L ° C 2 z) CO C N r r Z Z N N °.Zl �, m m Cr,V,-< �= M°- r m Z m x 1A G7 D CO NA z co n < A m < zc°if n r— D O O= fTl z N Z Z [A m m ° fTl < Z r Fr;�f Z .Zl m N m iig zm Z mC7m Q Z Z n ° 0 z mN m r CD7 �i —O I' Q r � 'o �° -1C m ° m ° % O �c p 0 °y ° 3 •O ` x Gr 0 C Z z ��w �° n�� fA o x 3 N r m n* x " x m z r m� Z m .,1n (n0 D = -, O z — N N C7 m MI O , W f� em II Nm rmm -1 m O * ° m W G) 2 < rm+l W m r z r r x �D r , m U, co mN II Om �C=y° ? D x n Z a� x W y ° mz CO) cm O e M II °O -m �xf**77V) m ,Zmf x, x N 4 2 m Lo > o O �a �O m0 OD Uf m N r O) P1 O n n '°@ �N� �� Z�x n m 2) w Z fZ+Oi m m N < r rG)• Q O 1f '� N p z x z 0 n m �p m_ z m I[�� 10 mD Z r'1 0 0 Z x m 0) �Dz Z Z P1 N D r Z m rn O m w -17 O > V oz Z z 0 C 4f m p o LAYOUT: W-08 PATH: U:\Brern\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday.June 18,2013 5:51:48 PM V 3A09tl 33S'OS £9V Vjg 3NnHOI` .,_,1,,,,17r_ LdW�r i 1 S„N , - t t S 5Z �' ' 1 ) 1,: ,\'' IA— --t---- ',\ ,,, ..'°.°N. / ICI , ? , ' '11- ') ' 1 1 cn\ t cn ■ '- '\\ ) �� I� r ( 1 I � � � > _ m I ,� '� o �� 11 /7-.....„ ' , ' : 1,, f in t , ,, ,, li,„,/,,,/,,,,,,,,,, ., 8 ,2:\ m , ,\ ( A i 1 � 1' , , ,\\ ,),,,,,s,„ \,,,,,s,„ ,,\,\,,,„,,,,\,,, ° is, oii a � — l� 1 1I �\ \\ )� Le = rTln I JI � L ICI I 1 J( � o 1 1r o z N t.0 CO \ 8 D j I ( ��'t1' ° i '� i r '�1 ���� \\t �' Ilt„(1 Woll . 1 , t At. > ( , I I 0 li i � `I„ I � i l� C 1 ;j 1 1, i II I I \ 1 I' v. � , ;� o I 1 1I 21 i i .. , ' '... I 39. 5' /II _ I , � /I _ I Z J _ �� !MATCHLINE STA 459+50,SEE SHEET W9 73 I : ' $� I , i`, 1-3 r 1 1 �i j mn ! I�'I,` I I �,�I l, ...-.1‘', ,., ,L,.,,j'',\,\'‘',:' GI• z°> MATCHLINE STA 3+50 SEE BE ”'`°' ' LOW 5 z N f m OODOOOOOOO GOO OGG GO C z _0.,0 z c-fn m m ,�-. R1 Y at xii as co xo zO co. `D co. rr,1 co. o z cn a N a). 2 al -i Cl D _ r m- -� FIB* �N z z ..P. A ao vAi , m m z73 N v 0 zo C rr, i �1m7 O= NZU�1 Z Z CD m m O < ° W mA O C)� < m m < (�N 'i /w z mom O z 0 Z C) t7 TI Z O - -i -rt P C) -1 F3 N O m r r mTI O m r �O �o� m ° fT A O O v v� m °3 x W yr 2 C Z z yr 0° �z°0 tN o x cn m m -n Dg X r -c m R r ,_ Z co r O _ Z D C TZ—I le m 0 '� Ro1 r z x N= P rn Vl M °4 .2 r_CO z i 3 n �DZ rn = m m v mi mz N Z Z7 O ` � `/c� o o D f 1 "T MI M �1 2 -n m o w D o� C �+d H D Z I 2 m ff+l r N Z m Z ®� z _ 0 z r" Z-1 0 i ®p F o M Z r,+ .west �m DN �� z F O y Z 0 * A= ° o; z 02 W LAYOUT: W-09 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscavTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18.2013 5:52:41 PM V _ 8M 133HS 33S`05+684 VIS 3NIlH31VW r_ 3A09V 33S`09+554 V1S 3NIlHa1VW -�— 1 — � j -- ' f " ii 1 Im 'i r I �'II I I �I' ;I I 1 11 m I I- I / ! Il l Ii, ` 1 I 1 1 o I� if oo m 2 ! -- I 1 �1 1 1�� ���; I �� I I �� v 'C / <� 5 D J m \ 1 I \/ \ \ � � V' 1I1 _ I i 1, Fl„ NS Ag _/ ,I 2 r ; I ; C rn I I ' 40' �. . �. I cr, ; tl 9 1 I � I i A"--� -- Ii M.P.282.10�. -I I I� h\ g‘i p v I p W wA= A � T° ' 1 E'1; n CA o TA p m m „ C 1 , Q� 'jS ( t 1 0; I` - \ 1� � �- / � I 1 } m I ti 11; 8 Q I I al I t5 WI 1 y K :( ( - i I 7 I I I I (I � l i 1 l si 1 ,-- .. 1 k / E I r i 'C7 tJ ,, \ i 1 O fT 1 O O / S I D 11 I \ \ V � ( , � , I I, 'I : � I I` 8g! 1 e I � I I � ti l g-^ m I �I 1 I'1� I � I � I I I _ i i I ; z ti ( ■—�—� — ■■ 1■1 1,�,,,4il l ° _ !, 11 I I I MATCHLINE STA 455+50,SEE BELOW XI ✓ *i Iii c <, I I ill m• r3 1 ! I I I ' ; `� (; I I I. ii; � c z I , i I ■ � • ---1-1-- !!L..._11.IU' L 'o z --Z MATCHLINE STA 451+00,SEE SHEET W10 0 z mc: Zmm Z fn) 0000000000 000 000 00 0 0 z .Z7 m' O1�1"0 m -0 of ao Oi co 0o z co , 0o r co C� jN3 c 01 0) 0) c 0) CO V# -I • r'`m 3c .Z1 r'1—1 < n . oo 0 n 0 n3C Z n' Z V^� ,C vAi Z CAT �7 po c 7c (n 3 m co z'7O !n (Ai) Z.Z�) C ♦, art + OZ Nz� Z ., W rn m Cv v < Zv C mx, , zo nyNi . m m mw �1 i Xi r -0 Z°0K O m v m v M Ao Wo v vv61i ° s v 3 > E v7 O C Z z °i kBF �p ,�D N 1.1 O - N r v n* x m* m m* O m O \F �C° Z� n�� m 3 - GZi rx Z = vC'i= > m �nx ^^ 9d, wo rmm Z =1- °y m �D03 ° W m m U)C°•I \. O� Onv 3 C7 Zv rn A Z N mZV N Z O (o 2(D/1 m .Zml x z m C O m D p Tl o �pq" P1 D R Av Zx0 n < 00 r m c) O O 7 �� FoZi ��s..��°° V1 D * r m _ n m �D m O M '! Z v m Z , o v Z x O m Z v, N - °m °gym x M Z z m X z N D o Z D G 0Ei 0 o Dz ° CO -n z w P A LAYOUT: W-10 PATH: U:\Brern\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wlrline0I1OiscovTrcil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rnsrnusle DATE: Tuesdoy,June 18.2013 5:53:35 PM V __ 6M 133HS 33S`00+1S4 VIS 3NflHOIVW T-T— 7 777-- —3'x,,1777.7 g I,� , , NCI I I , T d I I u N zo , _ c V 4:ca / > 1, %' „ I I t, I I LINO lI 1 � I 1 33' rom t o D �1V",\,� !�I Ag i I I A o z AG taw I II ( vii rn ) o in J I I, NZ / 1 i _0 co i /\ m 0 ti � I' I Z �i I �' 1 0Nom114 / , � � 'a = 4 1 4 '),- ,/;,!; ,,Y,` C 1 o I �i Q l� 1 N Oa = - / I I ,ail iii z. � �6 t ( _ I 1 1 ,, r \ -1) 1, ,,I , ,,i , m � r � 1 I iffiW940 o r`-- ,0 m n f . ,' I y ( ) } II1 A I;ri I A I. V I� i /, / o ` I 'I1 i1 � f � ( 1. I � , I III END-MP.281.90 I l �,t I / / ,,,r f o6 u F { t r I I -� I �� I ( I �� \ 11 I `:'..1 gD { {f `_` I oz I I I1/11/1(1(111,1 1-'A �'' I =6 .0. r^ , i Z 1 z 2 f m , i i l_t IH,',/,441/1 X >_ I C I !1 / I / 1' Ii,; 1 '1 �° � r I � ! /� 1 (' I1, -< z— , \ r.,- '', ,1„,Hti;„, ,. o � I (, 1 .I , . L Z 0 > z -r O z 17 IA Z«, Z 0000000000 000 000 00 0 Z D 7)co O O�m-0 m 7) Oa xl Oa Co co z co L co r co C) N c at cn co. c 0. cn .x O O z - N ii, go Z tT .� CO c N c- rn CO z 0 0 m - to Z 0 IC MX; -I { m Z m N O D N Z m ZO L7 O ZO T -,x mzln Z z c0 m m ° rn m < Z O mn 9 Z Aw m r''I < mN n N a OZ N -1 r n m C O O C m 0 MY' m n N _I m r tH v z03 .4 xi 0 0 m 0 'l m ° °t°n ° mK x r nD m mm O 0 4 O0 _iO� m lrnil m N T O ram m °� 3 N T °r Z C Z z e9. `� <° DzA m x ; In r f�l m D't x r LZj r r m incy ��>— °� z ` ° 1--=1 v) * m < c�i O flI d�z Ir.— zo >c m czi f rn m m = w= < m �nx mrn O - �Dr m m Inm m M70 0 Z p .ZJ O =N m C z m m -1 T m F °m o 23 ?20 imj 0 r N 0 rn m z CO ®� ,-z v „"e- m m m O G� m z m a°y Z° n D Z m O ° Z A c m D Z ve 0 nm 0m M c z m (X� zq ww 0z a o Z I,,- , C 2:1 0° ó M r FO Dz ° �� °= z o P LAYOUT: W-11 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY raemuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:01:28 PM 0 m t$ y \V y\ \1\ \ n 4 4 0 0 t', , o M-, / '‘, , \\' \'\'‘2,\\\,' \\\i:'II \A�`: �� VAULT STA 478+52.8 41.1'LT E , n 8" GATE VALVE - - ., 478+55.26, 41.2'LT ts $ r 2 ti 13.56 �, � STA o 9fiI II �•� ��. .�.0 m A xo (A m 13.6 m �,' N ‘� _�rm- c z 13.62 m f r m a mm 9' mm, , v ��'�, , N,� ' it z v� cWn \ v< ' / , E ,\ O I 1 m 13,1 ny I �� �� 13.14 r� I ,)'',_ �� O� I� �� \',' :5 ; ) \ ''''\\f' // \‘1- ‘,)1: I: `,, ,,,, 12.67 , / -rr ON.53..§ \` l' r mm• ; 113 18 I /� \ 1 i' II 01',,1 1� J D W A 4 I 12.69 I 01 _. 12.7 �� ■ 11 ! l , I i 12.8 11 ' ' �1 �'1 J.O is 12.78 R,7969 I C ;�� 1 1 / 1 , 1 Iv\I‘'; 1J X. 13.8 N 1 13.85 \ 8r 3.1 \ir ��� n,; Q� `J 13.1 j p it I 'I J�j, 13.14 '� \Vt 7 1� ��, 7 14.16 m v, \..;/ ! j�� m y lam'" m 1 12.84 - �r z = �/ i �, ��-c'>-� /r i J ,,i L7 iti 2.8 O O i I v-o 13 II -o w r z 13.69 J -0 , U Z /__/' ��m 6, / D. a 13.7 ------m 11f1 o ii I rmn Z /�. _ i X 2 = P i 14 0 o °,�� 25 13.96 o 'r I /� f a rn # gg z l co Jig 114.1 ,_ I m A�� / b N m D = 1 14.29 I - 1 I t glg`.! L-�- i �� 1 0 14.1 ( ) ■ 1 / a { 14.07/-' I� �� z a �� O .4I 139 �. 1� � toi� D Z m I 13.94 A I‘ I ( 1 12 i� I i 1 1 f O � ' m 73-< L 13.9 L4V° I � / /� X �v 13.89 I Q. ,1 �� m mA rw I �� j -' �DCa IP. c 13.8 I � �� ii, ot.. 3 13.80 A l ( �, �� m ' / � h cn A I 0 m O 13.7 1 �7 a I l z 1� 13. 67 r ,� ri a z 136 13.57 ( ��� l' �.' I J'` / / ,I I 13.6 . 13.55 P -> �� i/ ' / 13.5 \'‘, 1,,,,,,* �o) / / w E X �� - 13.53 VAULT I STA 472+32.5, 38.4'LT� ,. �� , 0 x ,k/ �� 8" GATE VALVE <` /e 13.3 �E�� STA 472+30.0, 38.4'LT ,� 1-c/ _ Z �� Cfi Z Z 13.30 I ST - q C1 z � x �� / vmmDr N I /i C � z IL '� s 2. m an � / M C7 z DD f-X / / i V1 o �`" / C , , / ' / p� a z c 0 rn . _nz z rw o LAYOUT: W-12 PATH: U:\gram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01 1piscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosrnuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:03:03 PM 0 - m 1 - -- , i / 27 g?, Ul '- 7 yam..- _7.-7 , _ _ q q o a L „, - � 29.84 �� o / j, �p �/ VAULT STA 1i 0+31.5, 40'RT I J E-, 8" GATE VALVE o ,4-c-,2`(,'� � 1( j 1 ' 1- 29.0 �E-.�� STA 10+34.0, 40'RT 'A 29.02 -� �- �' 2 I / ''�/ ' , /- ,l�'� micro , f 2e j I Z)--''',)) ti "\� ', m Q 28.1 ;_ r� - �y� 4, p 28.15 /j m j '' m 4 /, / / , r / o ^ z .2 / a rte, /!, / ::I/I z z ><� 27.22 m •26.5 ri i 26.47 -a J j �( �25.8 1 ii 25.78 4 ;�/ 1 C zs.o ' 1 ��1 ' /i i D V A 77; , 25.00 rn. T 1 �m n ,� / t� ,L 1 �a oti g Z ! 24.1 ,�- IA� mm � CA < �� / 56 vim: ,, �: $ < 24.15 ( \ m 1 w 236 s �� N/�� J n ru °' 23 64 - - �; / '' �/ [. C 1 arc I I 1 / _ m 231 % ' l j ) f.i' ` l 2308 1939II v � 40��' + 22.6 I 1 , 22.63 �� U� �O T,, / gray i @ 22.22 �- oktIOWI 00 NI /, /�� ij � \,,.. A II m o' r /,j� ( j 1 1 I, ,11 o ZD ., , .. 21.3 , , ,.. . . , ,, 21.34 ; T , ,,,,, . ., !� o I! o ,' ii Ir ) i/ '� u 21.5 j S CT I a,� 21 a I i I �� N z°v I 1 . c` w r - F \21.31 m= 1 II m m 21113 m m 1 z 1 ti / �rl y//. o r eD i Z oO �c` � rn ,ym -1 1 T / ( 'I ''� _ - ZO 20.8 7C 1 .o I- I r, 20.76 0 -. T" 3s89 I pm , __ iy� �_ /� _-_ N f 20.3 za I .m - Z 20.28 o m 6. ° m� 1 OW 197 - NH 19.69 �0 o o z i �1 2 19.2 �z o N, Z 19.20 z� 1 9-z ,-1 1 m ° .I o' v *= 18.8 n -I 0 18.78 K I m zi --0 3 ,� o < Z-0 ('DN ____184 _ �� ` .r 1 F a�'II W Z- >� � 16,.41 � � 1 V 1 1 `1 I; 5 < 18.1 ������ �0 1 e I �� x n Z 18,06 rt I III U I G�i 30 �\ �1 1 �iL �f� o Za 1 17.4 � Z 1 A 17.35 ��9 i17.1 ' I co �,�•17.08 �- 1 ., Z 171 1 16.VAULT STA 3+73.1, 41 5 RT �. ` 0 73 ib.b 1 - - I��, l 8" GATE VALVE 1 s�v •C 1""" I STA 3+70.6, 41.5'RT 1 16.31 �� �I I'', A V, 1 (� m 16.3 M117 in* ° �' y1 y °'\',,,, R1 a r m� fmX - _ ��i m 17'1 0 A CO r C O O ks R _�\ r ,I ZO a j; \ ,, , , _ „, � zI` ;� � � ) \� VI' o \ ,)litk, ■ , � 14 `\ \ Nto 11 LAYOUT: W-13 DETAILS PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NO5C\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDIscov?rail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rownuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:04:42 PM V 5 :4 W N J Z S O 0 A OO -1 I OC .. =TI e r r m m .. J➢ I os ZC-1 A m o-1 - -0 m(A'T N I -�;—v z A ° A O IZ D c D Z Z 0 O X) -4.r ` ► . ►m r- p Sn CO m m 2 >r \� A / m I j o ➢ z r \ -- / --- m r = m . -I 3 r -1 1- mp /- II A / �\ p 0., I a' m .� I I m o to PR 3 I, p p A Z= LI C N ➢9 O J p CO I z <X a o z �co p = p ° (.44 z En 0 VIN O Z Z ➢ rn Z IA �_0 F z O Z 's �sc°a S O r OC In-C :C L•4 I I I N0 1I cc 0, ,A �O 13 CO m X CO O A O o D rrd IF A s 0 o = ➢ -A 0 C mm MV)OD D 0 s m CO M * 0 0 LO O> m m 2 �D N=LA Z N CO M > A O /\ rOW M M /\\\ morn e Dm XI 8r�r O nN z r �I% 0 i\ I NCO m �� r t)zc� N0 S �\ =r D sOil% ' °m�z y ° ° /\ r2 m ° ��0D� Om z I11I m��m�D t°r C7 I� \\\ m!1 r O GOD°� O �� Zmm m 00 b .e NN NA �n2 MOm m O ;Z Z 0 0 ���1l1 i�1� ��mm f G7rm= �(T� m �(� ;,I� I ��D m �� o t➢it 0 X Xi z m �(��'1 z n � I _ !!! m x111 (Z y �� , ..E 01 tlo 1 y m r Z i 3 *� fro �k nrn v� �// -. IQ i 14. °D CA 0 0 =r =RI Z mom"' % J O I AZ N1n 2� D m = Zcn 0 D > X �� Oc0p0 �r �C Z r OZ rr C,Z Co .Zl / D' co W r<'1 ~ zA Dom mcy� !N r_co Ny xW OF-< ° rm- \/ �y -zi m °1n CO I 0 NUj ZA !;;� °� 30 X O�n 0 m m s. A�� O <8 y m O °38 - " DC s m p,.'4,7•Z �0 Dn D=° 3yyi A �Op 0 D S- Nc m gga O D Z r a= m 0 0 < xi m1- r3 co j m� c X Ds -aN >g AV 5 mm = aw j m> -o C) ° Z a 0 70s > Yi D 503 DWm DD nm = o C ; 2 f)Z AOO f�r1T0.m /�� m �D m 11 GZ') 3Q r0m Tx. , I m° O > Im r r 2 D D g Z 1r ./% -<0 1 0 Z \\ CO fns �0r-� 2 O? -0 0 p 0 !!!! 0.Z7 O (A \ %.:, rr,TOD {0 r O.ZIM 00 �N -1(AN rM M—4 Z Z ;//\ It =,m -. W A Z Nm 'VO OC)f/1; pn�°� •4 N C') m Wes° m° m0 CN��. W�DAD � I� Z O C') N A< t0 m c00r i i A,, A`V �i �' w 0 m0 C7C m OA .�Z`i C '�i;i: i :i i-� to m �� C ['>- NA �.Zl (.,�.'O0 v-i ON /� �. �P����I*.��,.��,�. �� =m 13 N- o "� g to m° /��� ter► �r►��?► �7'�ii �1� D r 0c)z 0c➢) -13.o. �Wr �ZC3° a Z id' `Ci��1 m m m p z K 3°m 5 0 n_Or CO 2 D Z KyKyJ = �'W. P 1;:1 O = M �d 1� •1, 1���� Ii z �pm� ctOna2 o�2 ActOi cO� �ct°nt°� ! al V.% 1 / 1��y11- j !' D r Z ,y f7 D e@(�D O D < D _ �k� i_�L_� _ �� ° A 0-00 r< x< o c,,< n° Wm sig., z ~ O 2 K Ij' r 0 °°�0 DOA DOA DO 00p 0 �' �_i r O zom� o�m v;m ovav* _ m z Z �p V >�� �ODm °nn PI c21 Ono 000 d Z i A �cn r r9 Li m� m�0 m--+O s� D 0 e ' m M 0 ��O 1_zi)iZ in°Z NOS N0� A {{NN Pi mCOgVA . 0 m m 271 0 e 6inP D Z m Z , O a et r"" m A ° << z A �cn�1 *tnM z�D�c1n z�aACCn PSC: Z r f+1_Om 0 C =-13Z ��Z OX1C)AZD OAC-A ZD n A�1 rDZA A o =0T =Oy �Z C)r,1 ,13E �mc2m 7t`1 0 G 2 m0- -4 1 O r+TO= MO= CO C)13 OpC 0Cz)/3OOC z m NAN Z n m Z X20 X20 m=--IC�1 m2DCM�(� _� �� ��� ��r o 0 �ZV >� vC,�WAry �Dm�ry OT� m �D� pD *. °m -°m vm' mmm vmmmZO �Gjm ■ C m DNr ➢c/>r A CNAO A CNAO�) 1 O Z myr °-r 1n�D0 N ➢° coi r mCO mmW yDmrA,1ZD �DrAr1Z➢O { �m �r1 x1OZ x,°z Oz z 0,,7° OA W rWo LAYOUT: W-14 DETAILS PATH, U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01y0iscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:05:13 PM V A $ x 0 °Oi z \ mN v N Z7 0� N 3 x x N N rn cn g v v �A m �� p co a o m m 1213 LB xx° m D m I m '1-I iA�' _Zn I m ° z O II II mO': p CDm I I vODim A O O x m oN I D m-I z z.. « m mm w ° v m pN m m oo(°m '<//,‘ rnv _ AN I i m °z r� 0zv r r 0(*1 A 0 0 O \ (7 'rn O co A/A (5?O-1 V � 1 O O Z //. TE EhCO0-.} \ 1 I Z rT, 3 O1 z \ m Z/� ° i 0c` �I� II �l\ � : 24°° D�f O --— • v y' I (-) -_ - 1 s - - f_ - I ■ _I - I O r II 0 A 7c �p° III _ I Eld z v e L_. __I N � Z m o N m N '� II ' 9, - _— � rDwm N \ > Nm S I , zm AO o >ci co Do \ - p - m Om) O� /; T 3 — \/ - Dy5 mmqO no8 � 1-t 0PNJ /A ,' * 0 ' �M Dm < C 3 m C OO)U V' 7 � -z D-vp 73 r4N mD � rn 0 oro * Z g��rnP�O 0 c h° a fl21 Z. v 'y O m m , z° « \—W w p ,o fir \- x 42" S° x �m o ¢ \ \\ !el , co '`` is' P s o A/. (W8741'CIE \ 1404 x H�m m O 1 A -1 c,O� 3 A Z Cr-- O tr N N z il ,,r 16,. 1 \ D D s m Pi Z cg ,A ` \ O ;:! `R m r r ■ ,\ ° III IN m Z i- i!i:: a \ —4 w 'n A "` k ' •N xZ>F> i< . -- _ m =Iq c) 616.11 1+11 __ XP o A, .= � 7o z z O 0 v 0 D = m Flog a m o m o <z 9" MIN -- IM �i . O D mW A � ll cn A wv Z Z m m> Z°NmomOZ 0A m ° _— D 50 > %�8rnFzi 3WZ to h;- ..L I mq 7cO (n_A . ^n�vfoCD Zfr7 x -I-'T'm0 = 0 -IDx-(OCDOD W WNNNN COOAN �1 -+ •e , ° _ mm o z> ZmAT- W C)Iiirp O)D W A N O COO) ? N O E m Zm r43 r43 z ",I r v 0 r D z D T him „1 LL s° 1 _ m�T o�i'=0m�+T1�c��o� li 11 NNN W0 1 — *fitO (tn O r Z.Z7 D D r O N A O V A A (T 01 to N O) T ,7 D � �1DD(n G7Dr O� yO ; p S N m N 0 _ .�04 5 m r 72 (/) D0 ZZm OOm y m- A I A I III mill 4� Z o n�r Z_.-,D��C Co V(nA W WN --. -. rnA -• o8 Z = O �� O-t±2 w x• V) N V O O) V CO -, (T CO A O v N A — A frlOCDrmm-iI,1 -1 cr c _ GI x- Z�czim z 0 Z AO m D O v+ Z °C°OZ� D m 7OC W °=v°) o 0 N .•.I L7. n V(T A W N N N co O) A N p (n° _G_ (n Co U CO U ICJ A 0 O)NJ T�T r (n 3(n G �OAO m N yO N r M-z 7. fNm� zN F 1 m m _� I O + II O Tm y. v li o o W ? CO(T w OOO O)(T WN W -. _, T W a`�OmmZ Dm DD DOC 2 ai 2D ±-1 = z ° y r N5°rrl= Orl O°C7�? r- mm m _') m �')m a oN m mmnm-_I-I c°'� (/)-I 0 >CO O O O zDZm M Z x 03 O W E.Z (-2 0 N CO COO (T A (N w N -• D-,z m O O '<-1 m -A D Q AN r> 3° o40i ovA \A� �mnF,� vf� v mm ra --I a/ N r N A� nr'r mzrO-r I-' {S,h vZ oo N :. p oxW 0 -< (°n=>OZDD - N J z z z O °wm_> NomrOv i co Q (p N0 O % x x i w W O) W O V cn A w z Z Z 8 x co C mmr .ZJ O i cC o m m m m a �t"if5 _, mv'1DOz O\ mr z _ m�<°AA r �2.-liN� a - Q171 �q N m(n°�Tm(i Oo (.4 Fs) " •y W Azp Oz ��1 O /yam p��y�I Xl-nCv= °p°O °000 <>ZZ 5 0 rn ZA CO01, O rA 2f Z �.e -n Z 71 O m C Q, m 0 0 y < .A -nz z Z W p v I LAYOUT W-15 SECTIONS PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscavTrail\99Svice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: raemuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:06:11 PM V o ■ 4 4 4 4 s - - 37.64 ___ m ,_.._.. s r i- moo 'i ! I I 36.03 II r---------.�1 r44,-13 Ja ! I I ID __ N 13.42 I / v� m �1 v / 36.03 2 : I -m x ', I 1 c-1 a °1 xi 10.25 / 35.66 N rn 1 / - czi 1 m 9 rnN I 0 8.36 rt !, m I I r a 34.19 I I 1! ` 8.49 I p o mro I I - 5 a ><g v r- 35.85 D u I i u+l a o x , xi m I Nz C ,y� c�o' ! i } O_! a c 8.63 E m m L m 'Tir m F 9 m 36.45 ° z CO m° N 8.76 7 8 �o fB . Z N A 7 z _1�° a6.a1 1 + ii D' O c P c II'o' O cc VI I o 8.90 o e I 1 4,/WZAZ . L ! f o r o ro) 9.03 n E IA p o f v _ ° I _ _- . _ � I r .Z1 Z fr A ---- - o e m - roF,ow m I w - 0 1 v 35.18 u �cn z 9.17 C)x x �• ro•I ' y r I ----I �-Z =a rn a 33.93 a 1 0- o mil N 8.79 m I+ I a __ --I 30.75 1_--`-/ 7 - i II 1 a nn m 1 ° - 8ry 9y 6.23 - 4.F� N°; l I1,1 �� I o m 29.39 m;moo I I ! c�o m x I _vzj�z O 1 rN0 1 I y 7.65 \ mvo. f sm0 I I 1 = \ cciz CM V) I 0 - - \\ c 28.90 I ■ I 8.74 z D I z CO I I - o-_ L_. qe m 28.41 N S 8 i °m z ce144 11 ii _v'zr W I oOD� D Xl -' f'<'I�Z m m m f I ooc� � ISI1 � N � v m o x °� �1�i1° W e ono o e C q q v m ------- - -._--- In cn ------ - ----- --__- ----..... ------ ---- -- ----- ------- -_-.----- m� A I v i- 12.01 rOD - - - - II �-ov'-...- ! I II c<D x ! I ,I f szv 3.22 3 A z 11 R4 m o; I -1 1 i "1K f ■ v0 I m s�> 1 / Z-0 N §2 3.37 ! 10.48 ` 1 , / z-p x Aga - - 1 I �• o _IJ l I 1 1-�_ 3.32 N i 12.07 \ 2 !, µ ��'! i III urn !i I I I III z r 1 - 73 �o 13.01 �m I I - ' - LP 1 L',,' ! z ro� 1 I -I m 3.28 � * t o m� aw I I w "' °� -- I l j z 3.55 13.44 . wt mr v) z r� w m° °°o = C)z x �Q 3.91 +m = v0 _ 13.86 M 3 c <o !Lr' _Z O-a 419 - - � I 71A 0 y° 14.30 1 I + ;o`er 0 �z° o �g 1 z 0 0 Ii z e + V i 1 m � e o x -4.37 Z I 14.76 N I I 1 I Z N� I C m m m I I a C 0 N m m i 4.50 l - III 14.90 n 11 11 oI Ln 40 I 11 NZZ - 6.01 - - l I 14.60 - + -___-7„ .1 b". C9 ° -I r., c N m I 1 I Z 6.05 + 14.37 ? Kam 1- _t Ka m b CO 6.05--ri _ _ __pa 0 L • R4 xi 1'11 14.16 vii 0 n \ Z 1- N a"°��1 6.03 13.71 C Z iv 1 , 1 JN _ e o 4 . e e a o= z 01 W P LAYOUT: W-16 SECTIONS PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Chants\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svice\CAD°\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 15,2013 6:07:17 PM 0 q e 4 4 a 17.55 I ®m / _......-. -I-- -n --- 16.63 y�a7 N i / 4 9 I I O V q O•N O 14.06 II ! I 19.43 I 1 I ' <6 cn t m 13.83 0 o ®Z 19.39 h < O A r --- :--- Il_O co---_ ----°' L �� - ��____ N ------'II II'II' Z 14.01 ° rA I' a 1 �z1 o x Pi Pi c gr 2 cD m 1 19.46 A X 0 11-c ; z� +bi 14.27 O - 0 m�I Z VI �� O - - ' 19.54 t.. L. 14.69 1 A � C I .. 1 g 19.34 u n O- I �-. Z c� i.rnm rn;� 15.04 o 1 p x _, m t xi .a i N lD u CT D�1 i --._- ---- '-- - -r ------- ------- .__.._ I -__ N> 11 19.10 ' w FP. I III ,I u co I r w NI r I o o r 18.57 o w - -. - 17.96 o I I- I 1 17.64 1 °'r 1 .¢� 15.30 , Iv 14.98 j 1! II 1 14.24 I 'I II vx-i � 2 o- >2 14.01 az 1 1 > 0 0 I y �o dJ m co <� m 3 -.N C + 12.27 i �� ®x mo R =1 -q Z fp c __' J \ -.. r0+ � 12.07 IPi 1 1 OD \ io Cr, �/ $§rye i 15.47 -. ° e - 17.34 r7 0 0 ■N. v a. o n 13.51 --I 1 k,Ii 0 11 o mr 0 o �- q 10 1 �S 14.01 v> > 1 A , 1 7+ i 1425 m _ 5O 17.01 I > n mOZO 15.72 O z> z _a CZ o �\ ®x Z -I I- <o y m D-rni -I 16.72 I r4,1 M' m C! ( 1 -1 z - =1 In g 16.78 I 1-o zi Ua Z C-1 , I my 1 -_--- - ------ -- -- co i---- --1---D _----.__. 'i._._I� 16.90 + 16.19 I m m 16.68 f .. N a0 0 Cn f+l > - -- _ - 0 �N _,0, C n 15.59 < Z <o fp m � fl1 1 -I -I C1 r I 1 ,1 Q . 16.53 �_ ®� ®� • Z 11 Z c r r ii ii O. 1-, pq: 4 o 0t0 1 x `4 Tn N t c� 15.00 Z o N MI ii D z z 16.50 C) I ; z 'w't, t I 0 53 0 f G! m 0 C � 11 y G. 14 58 I . [co TI 4.' �! rn (I) 0 t0 16.63 rT 1 `- I ,11. .43 Z :CJ O 1(.71x 1 ; 1 '' py R1 t s.72 CO 1 -°Fe s, C7 O CO Z N a - 1 o , O 17.04 I o N m a CD CD P O o ---__ Q --_-- -- 1 } p, 8 Q V C LAYOUT: TO-01 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\CIlents\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOly.iscovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:08:49 PM V 5 LT 0 z •o•f J-O O A o m O D Q 0 D p v M K NN 9 � A !fin cc 2 AO x 7Cf L� C O c Y ° O o f rr /73 I- > 2 7C v rn Z 7 D W ,i y2 _ .. 0 r g ° N w 1 C7 2 I- 1,, g o C m�O O O oAI N C m r- 1- s m v v m Po aog4, 8:41„to 2, (044P1Z m m . c,, ° Z °?D *0 0 m i E 41 4 $ a) .. 3 ;, .. a 1 2, O i O �>to p DDr otO O Z m �Ay 18g .P ir A (O Z ti O C= m O o4.? •(75 D e .> o• mj m 1-3 W m n > zo co ▪ m> a• 3 Z OZ • mn o ZD O z —I -0 O pj .m O M -0 m v TI N t , S A W N-ri D Vii: �> mZ mo =m m1 ffr, z .m N Z Z ,`.L d ®. ,m cy -In D� m o (�/ vN moo -o tr*17 c g 0 O d. >0 nil m m 3< Z r .-(J O °0 N N mm C y, pIm/1 Z =f7>,_ r,�vj 1n 2 i rri (n m ono A _.> 77 Z --OA > < o m CO C 5AD F. m> C) m ^T VV) -� 0 —1 C7 IV C/ 112 Z m - W w o LAYOUT: TC-02 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954–NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrlino OiacovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: roamuate DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:09:44 PM V MATCHLINE STA 448+50,SEE ABOVE 5 -- —77 'r, ( 7—! ; \ -.r f id { � � 01', I „. 1„.„,,„--„,,, , , 1 /, Im. ,,4 ; r.,---, :1;:'':, , , ,,, ,_ ,„ . , , if I„ ;, ,,,, 1,,,) ii,,, , , ��� 1 i ( „, it il ,,,,v,,,, , , 1 , ,, ,, , ,, ,•, ,, I ., k 1 I �1 L. - � o I CT 1 0 0 � t ! 1-? 5 I, r I i < 1 I w I m �'I \ , -v s s m I I -,�V �, f '' :2 1 * i ( I, � :ijjjI N c „ If ,/ ° z k ° �o 0 0 O A {{f 1 N O 1i 0” O C ■ 41( \i',,,,, ,'\.1 -1.•!i(A ' t I. II I), �' 4 C Ay .2 ) I f� 1 1 '( ( ��o I ° \ I I �2 l'O\ gi .. f/' '( 'I:',1 Iw 'I t - C. li ���■ 1 z� I I' I 1 'III IIiii.T :\NK\\ jl f. I Z 1 \ < I �, \ '.1f { O 2' 7 n -i MIN 1, ` c 3� f N 1)ki \ ' 1 If '').) '.' ''',)::',,\ 1 � k m )m QI f f I i1 a I / ,t, 1 I i fi /'� e 4 e I . r M n MATCHLINE STA 449+50, BEE BELOW D �_ �_i � 1 y °m cu' Az Dz X59 ri O o f'. C zN =O _m cle. f1 I 4 Loriill. bbb[ m y mfr m• C7 -- ----�� I- �R`. vii 11 rn / i i J' D n N N m m /"�� ' �\ 002 Z O Z f�__ i 1 j I \____,, ° n 2 o y n MATCHLINE STA 443+50,SEE SHEET TC3 >co A ° N z N ° p CO O m D n CO -I D �1 I Z !�'I 1+'I N N W o v)-1 O * y A • LAYOUT: TC-03 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:10:47 PM MATCHLINE STA 436+75,SEE ABOVE MATCHLINE STA 440+75,SEE SHEET TC2 pT— � __._.\__ d ..__—.___.. 1 1S- Y' d 1 \' _ii.,,',,,', io , , ' I i Iliki 1 ; L , ',,,<, I, ' \ N ' IN 11 - it , , , ,, 7 4...„.„.......„ , sl'.,,,,. I , . '- ‘1', 2 !:1 k , \__.., ,, , t1 \ , ,, , , ( „ , ; ._, / : s _ ._ ..._.4.._____, , \„„. ii , ,, 1, \ I , J,, L , ‘, /✓ l f , ....„,_ i__ ,, \ , , I, i 1 \\ ,‘ , .�� \' 1/ �� I I T v� m r - - ' \l, 1' 1 1 CO I l R ( I%° /I \ n I o,,:[ ,it,i 1 1 1.. 1 , , . PO CO (1'[\\ 1 8 ;I, iiil I� I \L .T ±T : I I o d r i aoy $ 6 1 , IC I 111 / I 1�; I ��� . . I ,, . , , ,,, . ,,„ , . „,„ , , , . ,, ,s_ , ,, ,, , , ,,,, 1, ; . , , ,„, , ,, . _ , , , , , ci , , . — s .„, , , , , , ,,„ , , , ,„ . ., , , 1 1,- , s__ .,„ ,,,„ , , ,,,, ,1 , „ „ r- I 1__ _„, ., , . , ,,,i, , , 1 , , , , , „„_,,,,,.,. ,,__.. 0 ; ,„,i i , , , „ , . ,1 , O , , , ; .: "I'll'„.11,1'1,,'.: ,„"j: :,;''',' l',''',„1 .[,1, di', „''—'\ '' ,.7\._ „„,,__._ ,,,7,--=-- —Ijklli'l ' , 1 , 11 It 1 / 1;; 1 , , Di E ,, ___ .,„ /., , , x„,„-iiii, �_ f l o �i q o ,: I I \ 6 w mn' )) 1 ‘.-.. ---... .,,N, ...,-, N., ' Itiil\i „ . f i 1� , :';'' 0 \ I 1 I' \ 1 �y i I o i m .�, �4>M �� i %I li , , , rn > i --' i r ) , 11 , 1 L ,,,, 0 0 mi- J < M 3 N1 < 2� 1II��II ��� �y �J I s AD it I y, I', •� / ! I, , x 0 z / / I 1 y 1 . , , , _ \ , M I :ill- I 1 1 1 \ . i ,!1 J r--- j Iice y' ' ��� ' ; ��L�_ __ ��''�— — .' MATCHLINE STA 436+75,SEE BELOW , I 11 1 x •11 `� ' ! Ii d I , Z f �:C O Z ,� , � r' O n -<n z �gr / rii y � !� �Z �z■ k i +ie0 6� p N W O o co MgTCH 1 w -®4 -1 Z IV °E D KO r L NE STA 43 d. ` t -0 W o= o m 2+7g,SEE 3FIE T _L,;- (i �, m z z En m N 0 5 Cfl Y• CO D Z 0 p N .—O r a Z z 0 m r n �f D O p n 0 D O W 13 N',,,, n �O:-.1 OZ m c� r CD m r W O (n0 5 fnm A ® 2 m R LAYOUT: TC-04 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: raemuete DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:34:57 PM D 5 .-04-- \0:--- � �, ' \ A \\ \ ,l'\*);';=)1:,'„,--,';',,ir,,,',,,';' ,\‘,,, :,\‘'‘,',L':,',.\)'",;''*''111,;:- ',, \ ' ' ' ;,4' \ ---` %, i \-k \r , ' o. ` \. _ \ I A� (..., ) -,N;v/, )i-tqw ;,, ,‘ ,„ , , ;(t f 1 I 1 Z , , ,,,/1 .t :, ,,,, ,.:,f i .,,,Ain, ii115.... ..1 ,,,.; ,: ., \1 \ \\N � , � V £� 1133HS 33S t SL+Z£b V1S 3NIH„wit , • aIVW 0�r® • �I I i , 1 '' \ M v V y \I B; 1 1 ' \ y ��l � 1 I 0N=m a"m \ \wa _ � i'l I A Z W A ..1 i I _ I 0 I r \ O 11,;;11; ii. I O � � 1 (/ 0 m l N\ z ' — ' j* ':'HSA\ I "\,, --- ‘ ', ‘, AN ',,, \\*‘‘‘,\'''''''fl'\';,\,',.';:,'-'',1:\;'‘''''''''s2,', *14k%414NL14174,1'11 el?,f.... 1 'fit ';A ti.i 1 ,2 IIIIN•1„ 72, - ;; ;•,\',„,\;;‘,\•. ' 1 : , : ;IHI ,%2 I )\\ I ! , 1 , r., % gl: '' ''''\‘','''',‘", ! l'i 1 1 , ' ' ! I ..,1 '',\r,' \j___ ; ; I ® \ — " d' "Iilrl 4) tS ( ;f� fI ° , J4 ±:\// \.'..,'. ■ 1 el rr j i 1• �, 1 I ;, 1 ; ! Mg '7!'!"i'' ' \ (! ■ '' .': ilii\,,, ,,,i ; / ! ! I ! ! ! )/ ; ; !I ;! / /! ' -§ - ‘\'-‘‘,\ '‘,111114%!%1',, ,,JIH!,1::::,:,, ,i! , ;,, ,,, 1 ; ; : ; . ; , , , i : ; : ! L ;'�14� I M\1' ;tik o _ MATCHLINE,SEE SHEET TC5 ��y, �'' a o• -1,,,.. t' , �, ! I , m r 3 '''',i1 i o �i •I d m m• n I ,i %I Ij o 1 �� �' i ��11 4 � ' I ►. ,i� 1 i � r �\ma I ' i I j O z � 1 I ' ' , , � J u Z � I ( I 1 O � I„ ( I � z \ \ ch 4 14 ;11 q 49415 �� ' SFF @ ^I FLOW -�1 t. z _ m G n W N J 0 C ♦�! z o= =N M0 *_° > mZ m =m RI mZ r,a. e ! SZ 3N �Z >1) y D 73 - (� � g Z cl 2p mO O 0 co `V m> ? o O O I >5 i I; ! LAYOUT: TC-05 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDIscosTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:36:10 PM V A O C' &N I Sf b ' E SH T ,,,r / 4)1 ;Sip, 4/‘• ; , i I it/ r,,,, ... : / j/1 '41111k,// .61%lob �� Nr // 11, iv* / , / ,,,,,,,,/,///,,( \ 1 / O �� i,/,' / i ,''li ill? i ' '\') ' / //i �, ;y i cif ili 1,/,/,/ %/ ; �,i( i �s %' � , \' & ,,•,,,.mi= /1/ / / � _ I I wAgmi j� / / ° // 1 1 ° o il / \ / 8 11 s 0 r/�/ / / '4. / 6 \ / �� VI / O N O _ C: m s m �; m Jogs (*I;874,4„to o 47- N ';------ : -/ \- r / / ' /I / „-,-.! . ,,, / ,!--%:',/:",-,/ , ' - m / m l i.,// I ,/ , / �-40---x ' -✓% I O h/ , mx �A / i 1g]] 0 / ,- r� mss __ - m is �4 � / yD H I m A r /�, , .A D - m 1-3 -- m m n ___-: Is xi U) m>* v I— O°z GG)i 3 AO 0 z> z -i I- -1 z mo '* v r p k C J mo z z m Z z m m =m .-1 n N z •z C0 Dv D y m - XI A r- 1 O zN 0T,.. KO �O Q � �r O . <W o cmO m • m C n Q p �} tn_ a *< Z V�+ zN m N x,Q Orn 0 �m � � °x z O O D O rn ` C Z - Z r n m �1 f7 -- n -W .ZO1 , Or Nv z 0 rn ° OOm m v O y Q Z n n r D T z --I m m co al W o to° Z • C ® 2 m 7Oc LAYOUT: TC-06 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlybiscovTrail\99Svcs\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuete DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:37:45 PM A 11/ ff'.l II/ i II �1 1 1 I I III II t // �1 v/I 1 11 1 1 11 ' 111 l 1 r 1 �. �j 1 1 i 1 ' I col ' i ' / / ) 11� 1 11 ► 11 1'11 f� 1/ I 11 / ''r ., ,1! 11I� ( I V1 ©1 �11111 0 't / / A ,\11, '/ ,%1,11 I 1 I 1 •D N 033 / i ; Li: 11,1 /;it _ l /I 1 ' j ; ;p, 1 i @ � ii l t �( 1 7 1 l � 1 � � /'" 1l ( /' / \l 8 z1 / 11 : ao r / 1 (1%,,,:_*N3P4.:ett G,'/ / ;•44.0.o:1; O ' / ;�i/, / 1I .4 1 /1,71 , ) „ io, 1 , , (, 1 , r ''' 'i ' ' ' ' / ' 'III A ,,-. ,,,,,,, , , ,, , , , , , g ON� / ; ;/ / /// Gi \ , - i II ft//,' 1 ,;,, / ' 0**,4 ,, 1„,, , / j ; i I Y // 4) H /7/ %' - , -` /Its' ) 5;4,-4-4,1,2,'\;/ 7 /Ir gga ,/ /1 / j ; ' j1II ` 1 /',/ :%/ 1/ �ft1 S %�, / o�, =/ ikT's % 44/444'-4-',..%-4.44,/ / 7 ,/ 4 4 III'm / / 4' /4/ / 4 --- 4' * 13 r 5 ,, f; / 0 / / t A /J ® / ,, 0c" i -40 ® 0 i I f ) ♦ :P. W N Cr 0 mr- Z ° / '; r ' � 1 / O �tzi� �m =m W>,.., �� �� m c m CZj D \ ,9 - �' N O O co / /` ,/' � " z�, 0> mm -o 'I, 0 o O9 1, J �-,:._ vii O Rl .1 _.� 0 �/ D n N m m c_n 0 ;� 7-- T o t z� m �_ �= z o �m D = ' /%� - z cni m �� C7 k / co o °'r N -� z N n , pp l+M'I O O ZCI n m D �7 Z -I m m y W o N p y AA ® = m R LAYOUT: TC-07 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTroil\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosmuste DATE: Tuesdoy,June 18.2013 6:40:32 PM V N 0 .7-,�M4TCHLIiy / / ��,,,E ST j 0 a e*A see , /,,,,.,„, i ® � �� ..J „, ,„ .„. : „ . „, ,:,,,..„/ „.. , „� ( � j „, / i I j / y 0 — o p �� M ' �7 // I , R m J / j / p I m , ' #01 ,' -- -- , ces,.i ,:-'';',.>'.>:'' , / 11,1 / :0000101, i / 1 m "2 /4 "111 , cN � /I T F2i'• z v ; ,f' , ' hhh GG I �� / /A � , M1N�w j I r , , : i 11,- -04,11 (44'7. ‘, /7 /' i 6 1 ,i,,,..: ir -';,;,:,,=,- , ,/,' 1 ; I .,,,f, 1;•,- 001 ,, of 1 �� r /114, ' '' to 741 _ � � i aoN ° ;�v� i jI j i:i 4 1/1:„ , ,,, 6 ) ,000100 '' ' C 1 N I 7K'', 0'''', \'‘',' ( , -.P.' : : -":. ; ;g7, '`,-, tIP 00 I (,_ „ \ j 1:''V i: ''\.i CA Pr 0 .: _ `1 8 a I �� I; i 'I o ��i o /; _ A�� 1 m , ' FOrf'; ' t '' ' ' ,„ v r__ (:.,,l,' ';',',\I'f 1Vr z\ 1 1■ ` ,,\A ,, 1:1i q , , 0,001111 1 -7.*. I I '0/, [v Ili I--,, ', (,:,,J,,2'. I ,,, , ;\ :, 6(00 i0 /*/ 1 , ) 01 j .git, / \ .,, : ; 1;;i!\; ':: IO I : I ; \' / A '-""),'''' '''--''' : '\ '' 10.1.• 1 ', '\' \ , „, , ' J \ \ \ / 04,/.11F,„, 1 -43 i °\ ' : \.' i 1 ' \LI j J \ O : NI� 1 I ,' \ : \ * s :V I 0 ''' '' '' \. , * * ',V \ \ 00 , , rno 1 n 3 � CO I 1 �0 1 'd � �� N O i q , 1 ; ‘1001/46 ......• O 444 Hl � g� ;, ; ; , 0\ ; IS Si■ -' ' 73 \'''‘2\'Xi''''\''A L 1 \/ ' # „-,..„ 113 ,V� , V \ ' /0111 dW dl S- 1. 4.8''l A , � % s -�0'39 j�n m 0 Cr' w N 7' z I- Z O .. 02 =5 MO �2 O eme� �71 —I Z m m =m Cn w /v Onm �N mn D� H O o co .4,4 ZN 0D zo ° P�'I V W v= C< u,m n m m �m 0 CI cn1M zN m o- _^ v v z =c� —1 0 U z m n 2 -9=0O RI U r v pom n r r D r^ S y-I 2 A m c LAYOUT: TC-08 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline0lyDiscovTrail\995vcs\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rosrn to DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:41:56 PM V rl, --�__MATCHLINE STA 4+ 00 7i_SEE SHEET TC7 ;�i �aili • Y4 i 0E0_ S 3N►'I .._, 04,42N', I p � 'gL+BL- T� �\.p?p\ 0 w, ■ � 0 _ \\ \ - 2_,....' OW°, ' / 0200 \ -, ',\ . A ?._,; . 1 0\\ \ \ . ,,, i3 wis ��� a ' MIN 0 � o i ��Z ` �Z7 —� K D A Fr �t 1 \ i o xr t � _� �O rn z �� �' '1 �° 1 �' �� (___ \ �s w=imp � �� �� wg g 1c s �, 1 0l ) ems®iiii ti m E i ,,- __ _. \ g,00 - �l � WO ! N � '1 � �'16 -�q k N o JON m , ■ o , I C sZrd.tF 1 b o 1- I N I r, Ili j C 111; 42 b IP \ �> , 1, s.i� , �',;. Iii - j 6�� d o ��m .D i h �N � � I. 11_1111,0 '* rn � Imo , 1 _ 1 33 1 III III 17111 . N A A 1 N\ ' - Fn. , ' ,"--1 /1,--'11'/ , -,-,,,„,--..„.„....::„':„,,-',,,,;„ , ''' ---- il il : 144 \`',' / - , ',0011; \ „ Ha,,, „- ', -,AD,' ,, ; 1 vi 'I o ',4- f 11 11....111 • : 4 _ 1 1 F , I %c �a! , 3 N/ )38O z • g 2 V /. 0100010,41110! '1,' /,' ...'"' ---- --- ' ' ' , 0: i o < 71 m{ 00"_.../ , / --, ' X.;;./--- <- \ 010116 ,.1 : m � o f (,®® / I o 'i n z . i / i ON d � ..../..".!I / i, ; ) ; : ; 1 ,., „,/' ' ' .1-WL , 4-- '' / ''''' '---/---')'7 '''''')f Iwo, /: ,r/p.,—, \ SHED , �� i I �P' I CA C7 C9 __ NO Li____L_ i Z ?1 •,r MATCHLINE STA 478+75, SEE BELOW g, C n d" A CN N J Z CC o z Z p 4.-A r - $= ice' �zo fl= O H m0 m =m M O0 O �� �D O 0 co u®.§ m m mm Z m O 5 0 1 N m N D Z O i - o O m=-I Z Zr n = _D O m rm nT- O >7 W c Om n ,--i " p Z n r D m 1 O~ z O f co A CO A e ® = m A LAYOUT: TC-09 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWC\ PLOTTED BY raemusle DATE: Tuesday.June 18,2013 6:42:49 PM �� NILS 3Hj1H�a— 1 �� rn �N�1H�%' gS'gZ+1L 2 g +OL... A Si-- �3N S e .... 3,1oe"ir, , s,,,\ ' 1\� -r-1/4--� t I ,,, \ a 1 \.`7‘ ,,,, , ....... ,---7\\\ \ f v, t �!i I l f 1 NIW I,L ( A v , , ' N 11 0 ? 1 1 \ , 1 \ t \\ ', \ \1 \ I , 0 s'K -F3 I o a , 1 / o ° > %° t1 I� �, \ i 5 I\ il ‘‘, :: v'- 02 , , \ '' 1. ;1) ' ' rl' , i nbn 1111 O V) A = r �I �II cn r°I 9 i I N) mC)-2v) ) . , /0 z Z I , I I M i I I j) . Ar4./A L',' ' c_,, ,,,� 0 I , I � \Joys, 1 irs i 1 I � � .4 1 1 , i I Il I i I i' 'I , , f 1 . ,, , ,, i , , 2 1 r \ 'I\---- , I ' 1 I y I Iii ii 4 = i� I it l it '� ..�. 1 (II ii x H' II a I! ' I' / �* 9=' 6 ` r ;� /moo it w: X12 ;F, , :it, / , j :r..4 Lif MIN l� __ ifij , , , , ii,' 1 , ii Z ° ,I .',I 0 a I� O 111 0 i''.' 1/ 1 � N m r3 i�o � 1 co rn CI a � , MATCM�IN� 4....... i / r 2 m D ' ii / ' II ..-ECOw `.......... o / , L '� I -� / / ' / e / 4/4:,,,.. ' w / :/k il r ,7,.. , ,,, i,„i;\,,,,(, ,, 11 e 1 1 1 , �, j �a ? CN N Z go Z 11 ii tr Q '��� 1 ;� '.� - / �'��` of x� �O ,x r Z 0 l, . �5 / r -› mN mm =m 777^° H 1 �1 7 nm cvy r�*lczi a� CO w /v � ZN 8= ;D Zm OZ7 co A° m r, ,'E E< 00 i n i O r m vl r i O n W a z Nc LAYOUT TC-10 PATH: U:\Brern\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 NerlineOlyDIscoyTrail\99Sycs\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY ramuste DATE. Tuesday,June 15.2013 6 44 33 PM V 11 x-cri t,, S,\,.T...,..'..,..\,\. ■ 10k\. \,1 ' ap4 \ \ , s„s 0,\,,,\_,_•r■r r A\ \s s\ 1.- -. s,\ '''\.,■'„\\,,', \r,, ,\,,\'\h\..,■. ■'-.V,,V 0 N \\' T, , \\\ : \ v \ \ - 0 1g 1 \\ \\\ ■.‘\ \1 l\ ■ ■. \1' \I,r ,\0 0 ,. . 8 r \ ■ ,■ ■ I L0 0P - ---- , '' to ttkve 1 II I , ' , 0 \ \\_, 2' n , rr, IW . 1 ,\ \ ' ' '' \ \ 18 2 A-- , , , , \ Z / m 0- o ' 1 \ 1\ P , ,r ,,, 0 , . 0 - / , /I 1 .1 7r, O / , 1 _ Irk\ 1 i ,1 ) __, , , 1 r i- ' o 1 \\ -O (f)1 \ / \ij 1 , 1 1 / 9, \ , r „ 1 I ,_ 1 1 , / , i . _ 2 ,':\,\ , C\ 1 1 i ' \ g I o 1 1 1 \ ' ' \ r '' I I / H 'i, 1 , 1 , 11 / co ■ ', ' 1 ''' H II I b 11 I 11 r, r H ;1P, ‘ ,- , H , I , , „ iq We ,1,•9 p, , ml , i 0 • , , i co — _ , -,, , \ ,,,, ii — ,' d 1 i k' Ci 1 1 ---...,-, ■ ' , 1 J i C gt- ,- \ 1 41114 '' 1 '' a2' ' I ' Z . 1 , '-- -'16--1 ,- ( i 1 4,--- ' , \-1 , - 11 ; , i MIN I' 'I'' 1 , m , 1 1 1 : A 1 ', m ,,,,,, - , ■ 1 ( 6 >0 70 0 -I 0 M I- . m_, i .---,,,,,,, '`, ■ 4., m XI --0 \ ■ , , ..< rn>z_ CO M 0 1 i 1,1 73 w "Cil , ■lb ?,11'1H[ ( 1 0 Z 0 E 0 i I i4 cl , 1 ■ Z ■I r I I kill I \ , If 1:1 i III, / 01 II 0 .......1 Z ' ./ rT1 la 1 1 ...ft... I k) 1111 1 r 1 r , 1 r a IwArcHLINE sTIA 465,4., go/sL C f , 1 „, 4,-, t\ „_ I , , ,\,,, se ea-ow- o '11 ,,,,,, ! V., kkl I I, 1 , , ,, s 1 cl \ ‘; 1 II ! s 41, f ----i oz Z "0 Z >13 •• rri. -L„ 1 1 1 11 11 ' rr, c 0 m 0 m r -1, mm mo 0 0 co 4.")41, I!H)i, r- zl c• < -- • I d. 'i " ... ...-...., j '' >0 MATCHLINE STA 461+50,SEE SHEET TC11 rT1 0 mCD P r.„ k m z .< o 0 Z M -1 -O- w W Co= z —I 0 C cr I- n DI 71 8 CO —I Z V) > < OM G-'13 Z M ■:3 Y 0— 0 o m •-irn , u-,--1 ...t. TI. Z c• ° © P.' LAYOUT: TC-11 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTrail\99Svos\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:45:21 PM ,,I,,,,,,',,,:,,,,,',,,,, 0 3AO8V 33S`09+991►V.S 3NI1H3IVW O!31133HS 33S'09+IMP V1S 3NIlH W Old r- -I-—71 7'I 1,1 :i 2 / /till 1 ,'' 1 Tr 77-', -,:',;(17,7,y, ''i SI:4, I I a , § ' 1 1 r ,s f",' „ (,,,,/„ N r , / , ,, 1. IIIIIIIIII§§1441/4 ,,;,,,,,,,,,,,, ._ , ii„, , , ,-,,,\ ,,,,i;:;,,,,i,,,,,, ,,, I ‘1'' f, , , 1,,, , ) 1, , , , ,, ,s ‘ ak• N. {!. , il , ,, „, , ,, ,,,,,, . , ,i„„,,, ,, . \ . I. r, , r � I,, , 1 ,,, ,,;,,„ ,, ,, \ ,‘%% d , , ,, 1, . , , , ,, , , ,, , l r,„ i I „,, I y ( ' I \ 1":1'::: "I'll i ,, , ,, k)11‘. f t „ \ �i 1, ) §1 % MN , A � x> T m m I I' . p, % , , , % \ a i �i -I _, , SS\ , ,11111kS\II az,% , , . , , , MIN T c , s m : ) I 8 il. \ , h -\,\ ._, \ % .,,,,, , , , , , L.,., ,,,1 ; r, , , r , , \,‘,, \", , s p., .,. ___i_____,,,r,:r„ , .,_ 1 1 , , , , , , \. , , % ,,,, 1 , ;; r , ,, 30/4 N q,' , \\.\--' 'Lk\i‘ , D tria, �9re t� r n "a m I rn i ; .._, , ' \lis , g , , , . --- 1 g : , ) ,,,:im ,, ___ i ' ` 1 '' ' IS , , i eP)) , ___ IS% 7C ' , '44', % , ,,, O,, , /,,,,,,‘,„,,,,,,„,,:,,,,,, ,,,:,:,,, ,k,sN,,-_... 1\l'-,!):,:s,,,l',,,''1,''1,,,,''1,:,'',::"1,,:',,,i,l',,,f,',,i','1,,, „... \ ,, , I ____ __, 1 ,... ., .... , , 1,s,,, , , 1 t _. , , , , , , „„,,, ,3 , , , ,, , , ,,, , ) 7/':::r'1'1:', % 111\Z y 1 P\i/ r N n D� \ / O• m< ( . 2 I� m _ 3 I • r !, MIN In Z III I ° I ( � a, , „�!CI m n i>r Si . ., /17; . .:, ,,,,,, ,,1 1%S r' MIN ( ,I, )! MATCHLINE STA 456+50,SEE BELOW 1 \ S , 4, (i) , 4\,, S I N �i M n � U �� �� . W Z C Z a > ox mz mO zm RI• M Z O j ( ( ( ' OrZZi scn mz Dz CO it ��� ,i ' _� r, „�ylr,IL ,'.I O..✓ r 5_ �5 �O 0�1 \ Z N O �O -1 •I ��: OD - Zm PP - O O MATCHLINE STA 451+00,SEE SHEET TC12 Gj,, D . r -i r �7 O mIorT7 co ••°m zm C "°° NG N z `z< 2 0 vzi N a> Z -4 o= � ZCDD D ZN D < Om —I (w.1 mD n m rD n O z0 f S Nc O ■i fd LAYOUT: TC-12 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrIineOlyOi scavTrall\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:46:28 PM V 0131133HS 33S`00+451,V.S 3NI1HOIVW I F p i','' N g : 1 N ' k\k„ \ II 1 ). , ' II 11' �t� ' N,--11 ''''''' \ 70 IN r-_-_--__ - ; , \ „ , ) k '"I 1,{ h 1 I I , l I � � D A 71 ' I,„„ 6 m f I „ ,,, ,.s 5 1) %Z I �, i I I ' / § " - ' ■ C I ,; S ; I „ ,11,,,,, , ,,I'' , ,VI R / II 1 li ; 1,, w ? g i I 8 1 T J� I IIiI C o :1111),,,,,I,',1,11111,,;:,)hhhhh 33 N r 0 �' I ,r- �l I2 E it I m + � ,I I 1"0 C sr�rs lt : , ' 0 I 1 IIt Y �/ { I i I I�i � I ( 1 �� I 111;1 il g 11/4 \ ‘:1 iih it I3r. , 5 ; , I ti o � ti Vin 1 1 ? i �n al il i II ?� W „,,,„ ,,,,, �— I h Aga i I 0 _,,, , ,1 ( 1 ,:, �� I;,,,,,, ,—I ' r , 1 1 e / [),:,,1/1,/;:iii:,,,'1 °m l � ” I t I ; t m �3 —1 m o -, Z it O Z —I Cn 4 m 0 s, r- 0 n z M� C m -1 o O ° 0 , rn o v -10 o c z C) -I W"2 =i 0 o z Oz IN ¶° LAYOUT: T01 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline0Iy0iscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: rasmuste DATE: Tuesday,June 18,2013 6:47:51 PM V m W If ZA O I z u I / I � / I /.t Vl N 1 4 O 07 C 1! m I I A r 00000 Z i 0 O m m O m m -I I o M N j i n C a c� © I .� x z-- x CO ° r' d + r w I :. o o_ D n A Z C °z CA N a �� v .� D O Z 'I I C\ r D m c� 2 D r- I w x a c' z m v I .. I v N N CO Z j X i F° o ' o c C 'I nlv ° =° r A I \l O Co m i m I �M O r> ti > I � mm z z > I i Ar -+ I I 1. I I v-u I °o I Sa m I ! -C °° m ri n 0N �,.1° I o T' Vim' Q I N b AT I O ' (N ? O 1 r I O O r • o VI VI m A A X I X I O N 0 � — = Z Z O G) Z Z O 0 A Al stir x x d QI O n? 0 N C IL C ett 01 -4 Z A v p L D I- r Z z m m 1 1 A P X m g Li/ (nN x 1 g ��CO °CZ lb - v r O • :"I A A P1 A p p m x Az-f m °mz v' 'I D.J Z my E--77-�ty= o �II I. i O p� o—L_.__ V7 F--- E_ I- r ■ / 8 m- co r 0 / p= f LB 0:I F.' Z D N 11 _ TI I M 0. Z 6- + -1 X O f � m n r c g * °Z ! �c u)° o cv a ° c m z I o/ � , o O g A g n ."I D .._.ON 0 m r Al N -1m A O N ,W p O r / p � ND t+ - r O o A "4 m / N o -1 m! CT,L m > m m n , m A N / N I o 2 ? O(T -1. I N Z O y�` � oA -0 + p = o y N � o qq o n y 1 A m o IQ ;g; r^ -1 r mw W rn� v<v *2 n+ mm o m / zo m -; © / I < Z / ;1� v 1i I ID 0 D m y 4: /f 1 q x �' l o � ii)* �3 I `, m n N - vO m x d <m x n z ! : I v 1 o • v 74 ma _ o o / w / I,M z O v c + 'z �r ! Z /z / / ' t X 1(n N / 0 0 =N ! RI LAM ,/O II\I Cxi xi / ��' m m A , 1 z y 1 v� mz LLJiD I O A m Z x D ! A z r m A �m ,I— / O i mZ m I O D p r Yr I j N t; I < r z r ;a+. r— I < N O �, 1 I N M —1 !2 m �� C I n TI /c) N �- �` x° o .CJ O !f„1 * r < N• n G !!� n A XI Fr 2 ur N n lZ i �*( /� 1- Z x A l' m x O oz Z L LAYOUT: Loyout1(5) PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 WtHineOlyOiscovTrail\995vcs\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterJJl DATE. Thursday,July 12,2012 7:26:19 AM V S in rk 1 1 w < r g 4 IT 0 , 00.5 11 /SP Z A g 5)g = =-38,-,,,,„. \ �... .. 11 �t'�,,, p' o 0 Z v. 20 Q O s O 2 a '/ \-om= e O I"" NENE' AN§m�,Lj P'aP�s y2 ..< 1 < I mm n 0 e 8 � M *** =1. Z N O 8 Z I D9 O NNNN1D n O ]OD U - 0 o SF Z [ gn r -I 0 an r O m CP MO MIll O ap - -•< Z Omo�mCo4.— COIN-O. (ni'?WN- N- WNr NO z m N m r —I -4-I gap ... r() y N 1 mmr I*RMmm ml*M 41 rrrFF ro r�*r�* m rn°< m rn In C XzzMMMz 0 rrrrr rD MMM ZM RI O 1!GG m N -4 os. 2 D 888 ZyiZZ El mma �m P ti r ��. PzZpzDpz �nPb� mTm m v r W N 000 00000 fn 000 G M ■11/ ll M113 d� S rrr �'ovv� n ZZZ S zz �r-��r__ Z S z 444mri �' z In z >>>>> Pp fin :it 0 — Z V V O O tTNfT 0 O0000 N N N 3 2,, .. .., O ›i• 0 tin o., .„ i i 03 rn n i m y ii< < x ,. rt M it,.**** ****4L 4L -o ri. AO)(9A-PN3-0WWWW 9WWWWWNNNNNN z V01 fT?WN--.010W V O) (7��WN—OtO OOVOf(T? Z lin P r. , r#13 at14 IA =< 3 g NNNNNN NNyyNfn mN Nfn V1NNNNNNN 1,a:2 ?4.1N—.0WW,IMO..W 17;= 000V01N?WN—' Z 0 1i> ° - ' DNcmDA C3 TI��'O�T1 N 'V�myA CDD7 T1�'D��TI w {_.. _�- L _ __ Ir023mmmm ZD m OZZ �A��Cp m Z --1 r) z _'._1 c_ _4,OZZZN .„.= OZZZN.„._. i dN r- �,°� W W���DDO�� �z =LI1W�D�D�Z°.Z�1 m. „'L r�/l;E�Z tr/)trn-00E -.,, �/1N�� • n (/ 11 0 0 _ C 11V(1/I m DZ Dzo o Om ' DD pzOm o li Om A -4 ti N �- omc°i m .- o0 O .. N° C5') L� Dm N ymZ z› - _ . ow Z > . ow z 0 ry cmil m m n , km ____ I ° f _ MO ....1 I- 7.41 MEM . mini r `4 ¢ d1 a. 'oll O - r ` 0 z � Zm O - , 03 Ill_1 _, z T m 0 z „ �+ � r) 4t x Ox o °z C As D z a C m ��m —1 n -v �o z m , -"I nC to "1 _, m 0Vm Q '.'�T OVA mm. C1 �'!1 Z _, z Ta C z 0 M G) or T'z -4 ■ LAYOUT: Layout1(5) PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WWIne01 y01scovTratl\995vice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:26:31 AM V V z 0 v z u / vi_i0z 0 0 CA r 0 m D � gy °o D r�+ vn mzn �Trgf wNnmm OVx m F- Cffrn1 --1 O O D m m 2:, r C D f!A m r C r`,9 O o m m m C) D m D x C Z m 0 p m O n �p 1 -1 2 z p3 r., 2 ° O m N 2 A � A = D -0 2 2 2 n D * x 35 X 0 Z _0 -< o IZ,.I D o `c < z D ao Dm yz -A[ -1m> -4 > m1 0 '9 •'-1= +�'t m r Z Cz'y m e D rrC l-. Z m Vl t/0 73 K c07 m 0 °D O .Z1 < -1 0 = z m z pi A = c m z x 2 O x O y LP c Z� z C O � m OrD \ � "O Ls) O I -4 r0 z A m W X z m r+l v 2 z 7c i O 1 r* m pp D S .11 m o-D Pg A o y� Z Z O Z Z I g I- . r { 1 Z m m „=o Nm Z 4; b W I ) I \lO rn 0 : in 0 0 i w n D N -4 Omi I I O O G I GyN g I 1 I ran I i i ! i 0 I I o a m m m.Z7 F -ci D Q o n °z = z O r C) 'm m— r r z .'0 zi x C m m n 2 y C Z �c 3 ° no O r : > O �' O m GZi ry N In Z z m Z m ifs �� z rp Z C O D 0 m Z ITO Z Z Tla� m OOOZZZ ZEIrgEmcrrx--222G)O)0 TI�1-n�Tm mmmmf+Tm°°p_r92o2E)880rC2C)Omm a� mVO-1O3 =0 z 1 Zm g'g'f<Z°P 'r2G)t/x��AO1-'Gy� �� �r m�ZZ�r-mfr°-v-D W X rF4 < -I m O<00010 0 O2 r 2 X in Iy X n Si OOOZZZzz2 2g crr�ZZ=2x0)0-7-n mITlmmmmm v°_vpf)OnC)C)OC)C) m O o _ Si CCZOCO�-OOm Zinz Z'mrl z•40«0ODO7a>°O0 mzX�ZOp _P� CmC2A000 m OD CbZm Z I 3 mN0_Im-2g =pCm„� j-i�rrimIV;mCy �mm==l°am _ � gOrVlfCn�?nOrZ�IO , Ul f+°TZ°�Z r;rCC 20 O—<ZI— m Z r x2 i �pC+—I C ZCbymZ�Km m m DDX Cr°NITTI D �]G70 mr�OGZi OAm� mmz� g OZxD �� Zm°F' 1O 0 < °t-Vj rir OmZ y0 ,z0 AZ OpOMm 226 TO-O r {-1 �a `o C,, �N 2�z F < o c °z �� R1 D r�*-zi it ^+ -100_1 Z 1- Z ° C m O CD7 n r. 2 C > o ipi xi 3 8$�° r- m 5S'eefa CO pac NI' r frmT CCn c �� m a:D N � \ O -` D~ � T ° m 2 33 ° � m �� O;W 2 * n -V�l0s �- 0 = -I= �2! L_.__ < ` O . �._ ^� m .4 m Z i-� it OP R C °1>*ff«�-I-Izcn (n - 4Vi V1Vl(n(/400cnox737323�-o -o"O-oM i > ,,^�I !n a.I cZ'>1- C7 v1� A rp 221-d*z O z22 -0* D mO>mc y 3. r-,,> �n �� n m� rcCnA� 2 �(yj [.,j Dm m m z--1i �ZAm1 z 00 tv Z° z o= °m om z F.4 I-1 m oz _ n 0 m^ / r rri 0'6.3 o y co co 0 q° g o a3n W Cl, N* ° m c mm m 0 N ° py 0 0��11 O -n x,m rm r ti� Z Ri o c =� m D Z O C o fm 0 m Z Z Z W al O 2 ����J 0.1 4t -1m wz IN �D Z Pa C D mli ( -........ • I O 0 m to -1 O z Z° *2 o r zg S CmC��y c"�n tmn m Z ... 1A o W Vl fn _I0 Cn v z)M m Zm o ° z2 o mo z f Z tn\ z o &D..° �rx1 w Z�to T 2 tT ry A Q V LAYOUT: SP1 PATH: U:\Brem\ProJects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01 10lecovTroll\99Svice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterJul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:28:54 AM V MATCHLINE,SEE ABOVE A a I ' i I0+ ) . cp."‘e, i a\s\tz 8 \ sA v¢ \x` `4 I eWI _e 8 \ v I , , z � . I { 4' 8 �y § Z I Z Z \ a \ r6+ /• _ m fe pp n.) 4., m� I - ,�, 9. o r 4 i'l ,71 rn Z \ 9, V 8 8. G)C) '‘ __ ',, Qi4ii OP z1- I Br�% .,.. e o F T i c)0(4 im...a z z �, 8 �1 �o I I E 21 8 ` 8 I I II\I s I 1 B F € 8 —— — —� �' . .. — . — -- -- �p I 1 MATCHLINE, SEE BELOW m }a El 18ft I I'gw ii N 8 MI m • o O MATCHLINE,SEE SHEET SP2 r m m• 3 y _ D k IT I u 2 n C' n1 O C c__ %d) D J _ 2 F-1 j O Fes) Z O O O CS) C"- 2 r m z , r O ^j -0 G Co z = o „ m --i ..i ' al. 4t 73 o � n m gym = yo oz m z a �' G') —"I (fZr O --I m 0 m "' MI -u 0o n ocmn k Z z5 z �/. N cn W m ▪ O po .1 LAYOUT: SP2 PAIN: U:\Brom\Projects\Clients\6964—NOSC\236-6954-007 WtrlineOlyOlecovTrail\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peteriul DATE Thursday,July 12,2012 7:29:02 AM V A MATCHLINE, SEE ABOVE MATCHLINE, SEE SHEET SP1 S N I $ ; I „\ . i , i8 ° { I , , / ,, 1g I II ' D7 .� nn 9 2 A� 1; A L � 8 m ( I 0 D° 1 z z 8 In z z� , a I y\ $ a °s $ ;i0 Ca Fzz p m gm D= I a N P o mi L' �n I1 , O (Al D� 53r- 8 o w " c; z o 0 V1 r e' N j �tv p- Z C7 r I I m F D , A _Z I . 8 D I— 40.4,‘,Q.,,,./4,,,,, N __� ° , ,...... A g r - � r ti , , - - (1)1 I I I 8°fill as , 8 112 T C a 8 I � 'i4 1_' s, h - e s z D s I �� MATCHLINE, ES E SHEET SP3 —'-" MATCHLINE, SEE BELOW o Orm A 3z <-o x.• 0)O F j y Ow z ZO O _ 2 --9 T- r c C__ C 0 vl;-; c, 0 cn z , �,, -I 0 .,j m _, �I_-- -o ,_, oof m ° e 0 ------== ! 03 4t D n 2 Rt- -1 w z O j m m ` GD z c D z z5 rri, z q ti N A o V LAYOUT: SP3 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\23B-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: paterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:29:06 AM 0 g __ ZdS 133HS 33S 13NN13N1114-913N1114-91V-----V4 O1V I g „ I A, I Ij o °m z2 z O D z I i i 8 ErIN) 03 2 om pl1 c) c N o its W DDS mi o v er C� I 1-9<1; 8 • O — � .�t, 1 ' 8 i 3y i 8 il I; 8 °Z o m � < -O CO y0 _ z 0 z no P?('Z < �1 Z� r Z m ° - o N m D � zm c7 m —4� n ° � Z z G1 N= -n W 1 O V' LAYOUT: Layoutl(5) PATH: U:\Breen\Pro)ecte\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyOiscovTraf\995vice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE: Thursday.July 12.2012 7:29:11 AM V Y,, ,n 1 O F, m 1 4 . 1 1 j' 2 N 1 4 O�0 1 '4i r D 1 1i r0ri m i MI r 00000 0 o < C) CA) C) x y 4 }I N III Cm7 O C = C a 0 `' 2 i 0 0 2 CO O G 0 Dr w 1 �� rn. r�rr77 vy Gt O O Al O N A ��Z 0 O z Z N T • v x O r � x > V m z m z 0 m -1 m it z m -0 z 6 0 0 0 N NJ + O 1` a 5 2 c)2 0 r- 0 o x Z r C O Z x ICx N '2 m me A r N D a *Sr 1 O 0 o M z O m 1 %, r y. zi z r j e. 0< o z M 1 �' XI l- z -I 1 0 1 r 1 1 .C.,,, -0 z 1 i -1 1 m 5� 1 c 't- e,,,zm om r o. psi 1 { I nom m Z � a� = 1 0 r 1 D N g I an11 1 or gD r<PI i 1 - -, 14) - - ■ - • rev) 1 • X :O X ZI1 1 N Q (n 00 1 = = 1S 0 0 1 1 o 0 1 _ t 1 O co N iv O N 1 C C ! z z 0 0 1 -1 1 11 ) r .. 2 la P M s i m m Sy 1 , iy I • $ 3 1 i r� 1 m 1 = 11 _4 11` =Zao = 1 r G) L r o"` £ m 38z p mZ - 1 1 Q 1 l'gv< 0 iz,6-) z c--i .•••-IA-j 7J c:1, E.—i •'' NOm 0 ! ' �� t r i Ca D M c+o .<X5 1 "� EX -< + I t M z =73 0 0 0 —I o--mi� A �� zN � °off C) C) vzf -0 0� a.- z r v o 0 O� Or c } �nri v �� wp 0 Olr �"zo_0 v N m N 2 m m / O O al+ n Ri O Or m D N 0o Y�1 N m� O tr CO �� ! N -1 m 3� � O ��' - 82 -.o N Z 1 0�? o <• /0 1 I - O) I mI� N y►�i i+ rr--� m D TA Or b 11 �r cmi+ W j1�Irnl °mm ? n z 1 co• 00- , u u O t O o UN x -I 11.-_ P S LIULI d m� © 1 n Vin:,, IJ u IJ o 0 Zr �� / Ias -0 o `y 00 ==1 11 u 11 v !! I` v(� x N !! le I_ _ _.._ _ �6 w 0 G) c X ° ! �= 1 1 1_ L �1 O x ZZ > C / N. • —Ir 3 1 0o zzy Cr:. x fib n 1 m m o -1r mzz 171 Z7 R1 RI t IJE z m - - 1 C7 c v tip Z ar r �, r iz Z i" ...r„ !2 -4 0 ry ■ T z •O ✓ LAYOUT Layout1 (5) PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\235-6954-001 WtrlIne0lyOiscovTroll\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE: Thursday.July 12.2012 7:26:25 AM V u) F, 0 D m -C > 2 A a 6 °m y0 z Z z y D 2 z > S �iO Zm r—o. E O 1 Nm 2 O V) y_ N 1- N A mA o m I 8C - Om O r jm sth 11:111:1414.?5451 1 IM ay i )4.11 t i nm l iyT ITB fE .m iz -I 17 C A C O a z y XIm > 0 x1- o rrm m g> Z _ _... w n0 -) I z n 0 JO- G) F u z ' 7 Z C Z r O [—= 1 D z O 7 — C1 �r xi J � W o �1 ll 1 I" O DO o i \` z ZL________ __._. O -n 4t 0 �.• • •• •o • 0 O x p fiL • m \►, N. \�•\ M Z > c Nay ��; D --Iin r �_`� Z Z � „°, ITN �\ O N t'�°N - \ FACE rn Z Z �� CE OF WALL I-- UN m 6' MAX D7 HEIGHT v m V m 0z -1 NI T A O V ■ LAYOUT: C1 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01y01ecovTraH\995vice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterJul DATE: Thursday,July 12.2012 7:27:23 AM N Gf w p q q O G , o1-- —i- I 12.0 ' ._ 1 PVI STA 110+25.00 jj 12.00 — 1 EL=12.00 W I z 12.0 ._ 12.00 I t \ \ ° o D M A m [-11.8_ 11.84 —I \ .. QF-/4)2 12.0 I \ ° Z 12.00 t \ O ' /" / 6 8 To O 1\,,, ° ii:7301 , ° 12.5 1._.. .,......_-...... ` 12.51 o \ :� '`� N x Z t O z D �, o +10 x..........._14 14.3 ....,_.. •.... v __...__. ..--...... .._.m,. - J� \ r p1P 93 1? 5 —•-1 ,-1 Z DNmzm 14.2 m wP ch D II Ile r r� ; { I mrn coo -o RI v I — ro a, EI x I , m V ° 9. m 1,3 + 9. m-1 .. $ v oC II _.... \ 1 I s,� 15.3 ■� � o z� 15.31 I zg I 1 1 A rdil 111 ��° r4 169 o; 16.94 1 1 A—] 18.0 :__--- II 1 \ n irloii44.2,134 18.03 m 9 o o �� 04 °m 'VI STA 1 +50.00 © " 'll 184 > \ 18.43 L=16.05 1 1 1 n cm I ^� II O 11 .6.7 O 16.70 1 M y I y +� _ ... .. _..._... 1 L-__ _ 3 w MATCHLINE STA 13+00, SEE SHEET C2 o 0 0 0 ID . 0 e 3s 0 it 1* ZC t9y iia i zn 73m ' D O =r m o• rrm -4- _ --- __ VH g 3• y z Z n �S U O 0� 2 L I , r I 1 61 11 CO ° 0000 060 Z oQ Z m D 5; \ 1 -It oZ m x �Z C my r,Ii T 'Lav C1 c z ozm oa z > C 0 cPR =gym • v nC �"i r G m ° D rmlC -I W � � Xrnm Nmo a m R rri + 70 cv D A o F M m °00- om m ° o =-= o m z5 _ o 2 Z Z A o 2 ° o X ° M n P1 M CI Om ° rn 2 Ti V r LAYOUT: C2 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\Clients\6954-NO5C\236-6954-001 WtrIIneOlyDiecovTrall\995vca\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjal DATE Thursday,July 12,2012 7:27:35 AM V q 0 q CO + MA TCHLINE STA 13+00, SEE SHEET Cl h --�-- • • • • -_.. I 1 I I I a 17.5 I _ i. .17.54 ._.. o I 1 I I p i el I I i II 17.6 17.581 t_ as t I 7 G c m I ; ?• o z X t , I I 17.4 +..I I I .. �Z 17.38 I 1 0 C c� < © _ I j [ ' o m Pi a 17.1 c 17.09 _,.._,....,..-__ ............._. I "VI STA 1"+00.00 I e I 1 :L=16.11 o °m =O I =+ i I of z I I o > I Z 17.1 '-T I...._ ° 17.07 V) I r I I I m . g l 17.2 4_4_4 m I ? -1 V i 17.24 I -1 y I eiwzTzgm + 1 t r 0,9 bit H� jj 1 < 1 $m n2 3 0 I 0 r. A O m- 17.2 _ I 0 0 <_ ..._, _.._......., N CJ : D F II 17.22 < 1 O O or 1*1� .�„ I N , 0 ,I L� �� /0 i I ° _ cI Q- I I -ri z I Z <m r UIN r 1 I ~ I C -.1 we M 11 , m 17.2 J_ 17.16 0 I f o Cm o� _ a I j - 1 ( I °m I C 17.1 .....___ --4--D_ J--_ 1712 -+ I I I Tv 17.2 t I I . I 1 17.18 1 1 I I IV ( II I 17.15 �0 17.1 I - j i a y I • i ;I) is H 17.0 ....... L I c 17.02 I k °° - Pk 1 -. A 17.1 I 1 1 17.12 -¢- � I 93 I I I I I till 1 � I I n ia E I I �, I 1 s g 17.2 ' 'VI STA 18+50.00 , 0 1 • , 17.25 L=16.20 1 I ,0'.$= E e _e 1z 1 N o 0 o MATCHLINE STA 16+75, SEE SHEET C3 c A C 1,. zy _ 3 m 77 0 i1- m F./5 o arm D Z D Cl),..y = zn i._ � z �O c_ .N 2 41 rn C, - r z _< n i r---1 H r7 0 _.3 o ■-n lj Q co ______._ 0000 000 m -1 = Z O X m D p 9 �Q 33r 0 o z4 aD m -I <nq 4t O9, N z fir• �T 2 m r C -,g Z m rp m 2 CO mGD O _,, D N c c ... xir Z O Z O Z Las 0.►� NM, Z r mP Z =F- m -I Z C / o o c N c r ,1- Z v o Cl) O v ' G m a m e Qj 733° rn W FR m" V O M can m ( Oy , m z m m 0 Z q _ z o C m Z 0 1 m m c M 1T P3 D* m O O r c c ^ a C0 o m mm m N m F V LAYOUT: C3 PATH: U:\8rem\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01y0iecovTrall\99Svice\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE Thursday.July 12.2012 7:27:49 AM V m _ q MATCHLINE STA 16+75,SEE SHEET C2 5 Os 21 E-- !-_ ....._.._,_ ,_..,..,._.,.._,..,...,..,._. F, a ! I I _. !_ 1 2 I I CD m I \\177 1 x 0 17.68 q ca o0 4. 17.7 I 17.70 _ _-._____ ._.... ., . ..�. ..... _. •_ , 18.1 PVI STA 17+50.Q0 � 18.12 EL=18. 1 ... - t °... d o - I iii m mx 0 2 $ r 18.3 .........;._. -........-.._..__ E ..,,.... .. ............_ 1,,..._...,._._._... z _._ r- �� A ` ` :y2 p-.,....16.29 ' I y ...-........_.. .}.. 2 0 Di I co ° Z m m ._._17.7 -- ____I ............._..__. ,-. .-n m +oI 1775 I Z ! I• I F') I l 17.3 I i I I �C al= i 17.32 t"°rn �= ( I o NFTh wp i N g FD i /,• I II 17.8 I � 'O 8 1 De I s or 0 za •E I p, 1 -+ 0- ? 0 � I ° 2 ? I 1 o , 17.4 O �_-.-. -__.._.,. t 17.43 -- `ri_ --�.._.._.___r -� I � z z � ' H. F E Ii I .• • l I { 1 � m 16.9 I ° a�4 °0 16.85 tO• I).4 x •►' '0 100 I �I N. d 17.3 v 17.30 I' i � ;I `, ` I /' 1 > , 1 I •, 17.7 © � I L 17.68 1 - __ I 1 P 21 1 y I P ( �� - ;, 16.1 B CS: 19+72.34 -o I 3 BVCE.16.74k �5 16.12 �n° I < crrn-1 i vj I ol°4+ I 0 �_+ �� La �© m ` °4 tO EVCS 19+94. + I x x 2 S ∎, 16.3 .+I EVCE: 16. a S co m G7 nl._.I.C. 16.32 4... \ l a c�° 0 I- ° C cyll 8F 15.9 _-.-_.-...... - I I ' r §'' -'! 15.95 1.... 14!D W �L G 15.5 1 i f 15.47 I I as S m S V• 0-I - . I� a XI ; No i I v =73 m + i, __ J1� O O z N o o 4 MATCHLINE STA 20+75, SEE SHEET C4 o i m • z • -v { y0 D 30 = z0 2/� aC0 'y,"I O• DD 1+1 Z C7 I I I� � N r 0000 000 °z oQ z -Ir D \ rrrr co<ux-i r- z 0 . �' ,' _. C R1 + co D m 1---- --- � m 9 D F° c c n °° z Vz 0z \� _ei, ` 1d1 4t m ° to Cat D O n `' ( 1�nrR F co F °ul 0 0 0 mm -I I- z m z D D z = N .ZJ R1 �! m ° me ^ O� � O xi co fop "' v zr m R1 0'm = z ca 0 to v 171 Z Z �' c m °I 03 Z Y - 2 _ 0 Z t 0 o Z m 0 0 C X C 20 D m r 0 C7 r C om g a () OT, mo m W -. V LAYOUT: C4 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrllneOlyDlacovTrail\99Svice\CAD°\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE Thursday,July 12.2012 7:2 8:05 AM D o o MATCHLINE STA 20+75, SEE SHEET C3 F, . I BVCS: 20+83.40 �i _---_- BCE. 14 84 14.2 a,y 1 - I °oI 14.21 �w _ I , ++ ! _ w o , 1 a _ 1 14.1 14.13 -1- _. .. __ I 't I � I I � • I I 14.4 I rm� �, vs I N . 14.36 u II` 'oN < I( $1DwN i co I e ea, I T ( I 0 °a ° 1 14.9 I I -� C m 2 1 I ° D 0 3F 'i G) 14.86...... I •, v g ,,,;:ro, TO 1 z PIS ? II ... V= II �� 1 I 15.7 I °o 15.70 i II ? m 1 I Z .,._ EVCS: 22+21.801 BVCS: 22 21.80 w 17.1 _..-.. _.......__.,... d I _-..._._.,.._....___.. EyCE: 1,6.96 BVCE: 16.96 --�` "" i x m ViIii 17.13 -o { i W=�:Om < I tom 0 I ID> N 1D n2 ( a,N 1 N O � I e _ t + I 1 4 O 11 t•i 18.7 N 1 I` i l G g a �� 18.71) .._.. g I' O I T Qg C O 5 y I TN m 73 73+19.9 nl 0 c1 N a Iv m I ° 2 _ r n r 19.9!) _ p... N o z 1 e 0,. NN m rnWK,+ Z c w Co I 1 1. I I $ I ; 8r +o I-21:f6 1 211.16 ._ . .,_._ _... . 4 , / I ... �` Ly14} 21.6 , 1 O _ , 21.63 3 '_EVCS:-23.27:9. -1 / '. 1 c,„_. I EVCE: 21.89 . � ��'rrII N51 I � 1 OX N If46 .-- 'l '41:4.1 y I �.I I ZN I 22.0 ro I z I 21.96 � - ... �'__._i _ xo_.-._ __ I ;'\„4..1� m w 0 m I ° C g' iy 22.6 I a i a 22.57 E j 1 rn � �r , I r I., ��.f i ''t U g I �r ro 1- ° � i z I I +L234 GI 23 39 0 4. m �m a \ / " N + 1 , , I , m 1 r 1 d3 I -I I 8 [-_.23.9 I in- Tc 23.95 I _^ rr j i II 245 j I : I 24.48 If - • 0 zap 0 i II j & 73m I N pS r m +!_......... ......_1_ .f ..,,_..__....._L...___...._ _ I'__ ..........._. ,.-.. _.,__ : ti 0 o m ° A CHLINE STA 24+75, SEE SHEET C5 �y --- z < -o yyO F0 co o z n O ....... 0 ��z tom _ C zl ; r ° ^ o T, S m r- s> R rci O • " , - "' „" l OOOO GOO O ' m Nr.. 0 .__ ....----j--) CO P 3 0 0 0th CO CO CO N RZ1 i 53.1 C D \ _ o4 -1 z x n � V Z t7 Z '�4 m� o a Fo c c C7 °A Z 01 01 Z O D 0 !/_fiefs, s ,rRRT-0 In Z I g F. o �Do o O ?1 -I W /� 1T1 •" m D m0 m DO m 73 V CG CI D \ O1- m m 0m G11 TI =� 177 it B A c,, r� ° co R'm M z CO :0 o Z z P °c IN ,1 0 iC. g' -1 "m 4 _ -o-I z O G) Z - mm P1 o m m a m o c F CI o 91 P1 0 C) A c) 0 m LAYOUT: C5 PATH: U:\Bram\Prolects\ClIents\8954-NOSC\238-6954-001 WtrUnsOlyDiscovTrall\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY psteriul DATE: Thursday.July 12,2012 728:20 AM V na ca ul to CI ce 4 ca 13 a. U' ._,,,, -,- 0 V ) g [ SA ... . I I MATCHU -NE-T-r-2-4+75, SEIE 0 ------7 i, 1 1 I 1 n) 1 cn 25.9 P./1 STA 25+00.00 43 , 25.86 E =25.86 o -- 1 . 0 ' I 26.5 -.-I -I -- z II 26.54 u) I T m 1 . , < < I 0 IM I c.,1 g I . 1 , m 1 1 P.T3, ' , t 27.1 1 lal 27.08 I 1.8 > " m I 1 -1 i I re" =I ,, I, o., g 2 g., F i F)2 27-9 I f- ,...„ <.,... 27.94 -o I .@ 1 s. 5 e 1 , . > 0 z 1 , . z h., I I eb 29.0 PV1 STA 26+00.01 1_, H + , 29.04 r EL=29.02 I 1 1 s , , , • . I • 29.7 I I 29.74 1----- . et,,z,33, on, , .§, -< I .,.0 I 0, (2, 0 i N t ... o-1 I 30.7 1[1 I 30.66 1 I o Or I i04' C. . , p ‘ I 0 , r<rn 31.7 OA 4 to \ I- (n 31.74 = 1--- I A C) ‘ ■ , A 2 ,13 ). I 1 t??. 2 s\ 1-1 I II II r- pi 13 ' , , ha C.11 NJ M 32.7 'Q. nr„.44.00 69 32.73 1 20.34 t 1 1 sl‘c!0;iii 0 ut pli, 1 _21, I 1 I I , , 1 -- Z \ \' 2 i,',', , it , ' 4. , . . \ 33.8 , m x _1 S I ) 33.75 4 2 I 1 0 1 1 • ", • , ... 0 I i \ 1 \ 35.0 m PVI It STA 27+50.00 1 3> 34.98 -I EL34.99 i r0 1 M 5 01) < , I I ,,,,..,: „, , E.P 36.6 1 : , , ' , : / ',„ _ . 36.56 5 n ti a g-I-III-H\ . , 4 ■ , , . 0 - Ina oz 38.2 1.- l [--11 3, „, , < lig! 1 i • „, •• • , , 13 ri 3 PVI STA 28+24.0 • „- .,„, 37.2 / ., g7't! 37.177 g t= ..„ 119 / 12> -1 1 r., --- . ‘ . . I , , „ * g z> E1 1 73 M > -i 73 A . 7_ 0 lI' x r f/ a - o o r m m Z z ?il 3 0 1 < , 1, 00 N co > ca r ,.___... :< 0, o c2 * a 0 8 '.41 4 to 0 01 M Z 0 2 0 0 C5 o A ri 1 -- -------.„/ r r.1, - -ir- ---1 c.D ••••, ;'''11 , z 7 CD 0 :--‘ 0 0 Cf) t A 1,i 1... ..-Tri ED<P ri 8 8 53 R 'a 1 .71 <id x Z 3Pr 0 0 et rri 9 4 iT1 1 R m1;1 k ±TF) wi_o : riP: :2 2 ... -------________, r.it 4 tt + ...4 Z o z M .....j) 0 0 o --,,-., -1 ul > o i 0 (cle.-0 ,- a. -o I z (.7) M Z Z > C (f) Z Ce o 0 r r 9 0 C m r G414, z o - m 0 i m F -I co m m rs) -0 X) M zi 02 mi CI > (I) 2 5 0 o •• in rT, (..n+ 5 2, 0 F,, 7) m ,,, M -I ....-1 Z 0 nit 0 0 2. 2 ''''.XI 0 0 M r-- z° a5u) F 0 rri 0 0 o M q 4 = 2 z 0 0 x z 0 2 --.... 03 x m co 0 73 73 x f. ,-- 0 o )7; m it r1/4" M CI ° i!..) 0!II o m C.11 .72 r- -4 LAYOUT: W1 SCH B PATH: U:\Brem\projects\Clients\6954—NOSC 36-6954-001 \2 Wtrl(ne01y0(xovTratl\995we\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE: Thurodey,July 12,2012 7:30:43 AM V _ MATCHLINE STA 13+00, SEE ABOVE -r--1-7-74:7, t In ) i• �T } l i a } r' i i �t i{tt{ t ; i t+ 4 t j' !4 1 j E j ' ` \ (1;t t E :ltd 3 tiFf i 1 • —n i {\ j 1 ➢\b i i { j ~yw.i if `1q[iild+l 7 c I ,' ; i , J' 1G\\\\Id t t / tt ii ti , ; J ; ),,t 11 : 1 1 �, ;,�, 1- ; t i 1 } 'J tl 2F4 , ,; Kam;t Jf 1 , i ;}i 1tt! ,;i, P 1; ! •.` 4 ✓ 1 ( y S t,` I ! . 1 ' i S f� t 1 f(1 �\ ! A f + `\,t }_�1 of ; ) \ S ;M I�jl{lJr ) 1 1 i I 1 /} it i ,, } ,.\ 1 y i ' :; 'I . � � 1 1 � O '1 �11 f 1 TTT S i Y \1 �., t i t r1,,\111,,11111) �,� /fIM 3 i j {®t,, } JFS 1F, } 'Y t i i t: �\ / } I+i I j t...• i l .f i J' V t :t )PAY)Ellt i /` , ll 1 / !1 /// Y1!!i t i1 ! 1 • , / If E { 11\ FFFr/� lJf l ! } I i fill Djt4�f °s /- Y ii;; {f �, - ; i J d IF lI w i t° ,i i�i�i i�a,t f 4 t ! i QO 'i \\ij 1t➢3 3 i 1 1 x A / 4i ti - 3 ! Y1 � 'F~ / jl S\� ' I IJ ( i111)II��1lI11 F dl i • l i P t "\ S ! Y3 p u i tilt it I i J v r I$ ,il��ti m `--- .____�1 . S r t I . t1 A i E t \.. 1 \\ O ; t i j �} 3tl�!}, < t i 1f r i f \ \ ! ! t.l 1 till 41)' j , t 1 ` �_ t it ) \I ; V j.] T llifi4l if t ii f v " t \ t )8 ,�' _ i t I i31 �iMF D A O {p� �i +r.�^ f ' t tw. i tf 1 1 ) I 3 ± �j 9! 244�' A nLD Ad ,\''\I i ' t t f 1 ' ' FI i/J t, , t � fEl t)t{71'11 <O �„ 2 i • l 1 J/ i I (tli A O m TAO } j j t i \ ! J\ � :i 1 I1:�! l `© i �tf+� i F l! 1 t l!1 i j 4 1 ) F p)i e tt3 3 t 1 }{ t\ } 1 I };t C tfl �..E 1 ° • ; I ➢ ' ,.\\ ,\lV t I £ I t,i IYi➢Y�{ii;lli 1 111 t t e I f t i i v\ t l p t1 y' I t t i { i i S l 1 \\\ ➢4u\\\i f1 I t 1 I . f _ i F t ti t 4� l f } 7711 }01 Il �� I l 1 ! 1 J f x \\ \ 1141 IIIi�i 39.2' }/ ` 1 `J u l //� 11 + f 3f I 1 i r { F it F! {P J \�e® ':.� t ;; / / �l 1 dl3 it1�1�Jl itt�li: i 1 1 E j r. t t i t i \ ! if 1 i I �11t1 1 ff1 ii ° i r ) , ! - } t t , �- v! IF /I z t �111t 7771r D LS i ' ' i " 1 i 1 t f l t 4 Ill i t i3tt� �t' EAwrzOm . , ` ;tti . v iy c e r r 1 i S . - ail�}: u_•I— Wp�y y— w a b t l W 1 ri O \�\ i j i t It ? ( t,l. iltl lit 1 'am aI r r 1 x.1 i J ? i' 111V iv {t 1! i it 117)1{{i; N f0 0 0z O F i+ i t l t i tl ^. \ x �t1l1�LbY 4417 S \(,I mD 1 i .. 2 If f 1 N \\ t '�� t } ti\4 t\)tt if Y1 N A § ,1 l l f \ \ r7 4 ) '�1 11 I // t t➢Y {}4t 10 I D�1 N ,ll 4 ) t�•,, It if i ! »_� °y _ , ( I i �g t / g i, ,�iti O � D it s \\ AI i I It % N ..,y t r I \ f `I till �(ii r �(p N e 1 I 1 1 . IS C } Y ) Z 1 4 \ i.! i /J j };I11/fj\J�il »I J is O — / T i i j } iiiftl Sl Q d', ll'_'Tr171 1 f i t r / O 1}11 F fi l 1 i [m r� _._. f ��, Y ,) 1f 1 �;; i , / I C �Jl'l i,,,I,i - _ f�l ! W f a0.1 l t / 1 , , J / en 7141)i 1{lit '-'1 C�CN ■ t 1 l J d \..n ? \� P t I J l i 7 4714/jj �\ (O V j 1 e i� J I S i O 0 I fi / % -F 1/1111if�1ftit \� oN i ) �{ i t t _■4. 1 0 1 i, ,1 0. \1 F t 1 t L L f J {S1{1) ti -t P s f r ° ) t ) 4 l/ Ji 1' r' `� �t,11 1, t 1 t e vt vv i ©)) C.? vvr it rho� t :f I ¢ . t i i i H+11 °°1 t — 38.6' n+i➢)u ve 1 r i t t i t t Om p it i Nii}s rtii III NI 0 l'l I I IP II ; gal A vvv ' ,,, }, I 1IIII � ,u1111f1l;;�� \ ! t f ; v^ ; v v A 1 11 J, v`i 111 iii 0 1171 j IJ /JI �_ ! �, i �l m V, ',.;\ / `° '", 1, S !111;;i,''�Y; 4 , , r ; ! A ti ilt�)t YI r l t i . t a .33 l ',-,T1 i' \t au 11110, t,,; 1,. +I , W t )0 \l +. A { '' 1}1 t �S f i d { '\ \ 1! i S { t 1 { IVI tttiff7 t J S 1 1 t 1 I f 1.t } 11 I till it p) 1 t S F ; }\ , 1 Pi 1,14,(1t, ,,'6.1 /pR IY Pl ' C i_ F X` / W `1 F J / , , t i` I it}! 4)+gi ti{!it / / 1 3 4A4 l n t 1 \�\ \,P\�\ / 1t S I /IIJItt tlj1,1\'')ii\Y t \t� \ \ 1 t 410 \ q \ ti\ II/I. / ,t i1 //ill It vvA v 1 ' ) r) �' �,itt�;;it); \a\ 1 '➢ \i/`'a , t i \\i }\\) % ..wy\ P\\ f !t!) \\\ I t\\2 f j f it 7741 1 S } t y 1 4 { t ! F S \ i 1 ! f m p ) W _ i \}` i ; Y , : i i t t ) ! i 1I \t i I i 14/1 ; , v ` ; l Ir�w .°h�IS;� f"'' I`tY I : 1 i W I + t A 1 1 1 1 , V !t W t l t t !'.:: f tY \1 { \\ , 1 1 \I A ) ), /itt) qjl I t 1 II /1 11 1 1 W j \ 3 l h\`4\ i rt t 4 i / t \.�i!{`fi 11 1 1 1 1 \\i\ ' / //JI J ! W,.. i v\\a j \\ I; l \}° \ \®.i® It G t I \) 4j Sti➢1�}\9}�J■ '� f l ! i t \\ \\\ \V AV i i ; , / t\i Tit ii�i�;1' rD .. I r t it l , vt vv v ; t"v tv vvi v"v i 1W f 4..711 i If i It I t li i q \ 1 .. l a t i A II t Jill d 1 (/' Y \I \\ � i 5 lilt t i 4 ._..... \ [[[ }) 1 i i !/! '\ \ \ 1 ?: 1 i ) l ty PF t'(I 111Ij f i� ggg0 -r �.. 4\4\I I i 1 W j i �~ \ p\ �\ \ t t o ( / Y t i'`\f�3 t t t i 4 4 IIIY��� 1 f t. i ?. \ F\3 \\‘‘\\ 4 P i t W f 1 )\'\ tl;j i 3 G ; \ /'�—�~ 1a ! 1 ; aw\1 \ \ ! S G .I i ,l It{}ik Ytil \ I V \ 1 \ ! t 1 11 11,7 )I I i'i ill 1 /F l . A \ \Y S\ \ \ l ) ➢ t • I 1I 11 16{ t1'i ({1 t) ! i IF I! Il 1 \ \\ \t , 4 1 ' yIIII- 'y 'i 1\i i j}j St { / 3 �1 X J/ I \\ \\ ! i Y�/ k l I f rt i\ t�2tt41't;\v g 2� \1 3) \• i ! 1 1 ) s\.. 1 1 )! ) L 1 I t t 3 } S{ \q\t\ /i V )y W YI 7J I t 4 1 1 3 1 t Fy D l 1 ' • I!t t \,,.1/wry."`\i 1\\ It 1 4 E I t ■ JI I j i 1 1 \\1 TNT ���J i.. f ! 1 ! 2.l t..-'I S ) !\ \ ® !1 t 1J ll y){\\\ \ I C '' 1 ■ p q pa `\ 1 w.. 1 , \\t it \4 i i!S ! 1\ ii 1 } �m .�3 1 t } ' ) 1 1 t l .t 1 1 1 f I�jii\,\ 22> i \, i I ■w r ° j:i.` ° ; .� v vt :A Y i I. vv {t,E ' `v i , 1 1 i :. o 'i ` \vi 'l �,l!'di. 1 111 a ,'tv�+ �s i� Ali IY.�L '. __ _ i � /t!1} � t I \ ) 1 �1 2 1 MATCHLINE STA 16+75, SEE SHEET W2 t 1;'' } t dit\ s { TI {t Z C I `kk I,1 \1111 F I p !1 1 I , D a \\:° tl}i \ c' i 1 \\fl i 0-1 01 s .... J. ,`1� °tI11 ) • _ I _ ! 'v yv' vj z X m MATCHLINE STA 13+00, BEE BELOW o �m m 3E -< �0 Ca• yyO F.< Co• On zn O _.._- ----- SFr -_.=._� J ri Z _P r - n ./--- m ,-,,,. z 1_ 0 v r_7 5'J c Z if] t__? Q m ;� hJ —' .■1 __ ICJ 000000000 000 000 00 0 Z .D I 0 aY m am co ea m w - m m co 0 c co am - am c orn CA 1TI �`�----�J 3 c� �, rn ao m o Z z na z -I ry 0 m M_,.___ �a ` 3 U' m X° Tc to- m CD z, 0 A v v0i Z 0 C I- Z 111 p..e m M m °c rn ° < c mc� Q z mN < m zt°n ° Z 0 D t,, 1 z 9 z c, c) g Q m N -4 ? 2 , m 9 cn � r C ♦' a+^ m ° 4 ,. ° m CO m g w a ° y O D n W 1" .t a ; > C m ni m y m m Z "' C$ 1l"� X o = o N o v,cn Z t '.�1 WI t�/ ; m m ': ; r E�' C T Z m o m m x m �D r r m Cr: 0 ° Z ro CD Z D Z F ,T, °M CO A O V LAYOUT: W2 SCH B PATH: U:\Brom\projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WMInaOl,DiecovTrall\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peteryl DATE Thursday.July 12.2012 7:31:05 AM V _ MATCHLINE STA 20+75, SEE ABOVE MATCHLINE STA 16+75, SEE SHEET W1 1r !" i i °i ` i— j �� i y r i �� 11 ; Ii ` ; 1L j N, t i 3 i'1 t i s 1 ',\e{ ' ci It} St q : d , I ! t - /f— `t j /t i k,t t 1 1 tt \,'t! ! I t ♦ry l\;,_44_,,,,,--......... Nr.,. T, ` D Y 4 vi t�!1 t 111 1` c, It , t 1 1 1 1 , 1 f \.. i i .....m,11 * ! 1` " C 1 =! I t 1 I ^iC I 2/ A e 77„777,, rn` i ! i D I J j i} 3 ti i f i 1 1 Z7 Iu �_", ,/ 't; '; °� !; 1 138.7 .._; rt' v,,ti $ o i,.1< 1[I i i t 1 ,11 Fl, i11/ r b ��M\,, r •' i I I 9 W ' ,� t , 1 i • 1 I i „ . i II _ I 1 { 1 rr ` f I 1 i jt_'!"r i £j t Iki ��� �`..., '� _.._ � j+li f t. •.t O� AI ! i ! 1 1 3 } �" ({ V I f t ,)1 ; , 4 ; �; 1 \\4 39.7' S IE , , i 1 .1 I ri' t 1 W —I IF I 'q �\ r" I I ;;p__..�...__. ,:1 1 I, E �t �r jt' tt � �6 t \ t1 F } t t '1 1. 1 1 1 I , 1 Y : 7 -- s o ,. a j w ,vi 1 t 1 I f 1 ~ Y s 4O \fi t� j I I i • • F 3 S I( 1 ©.1 3, 9 A ! It to t i t tl. { Y s i` { 6 13 mtn X i 'f V j t t i t , is 1 4 D t i \tI y 1/1 l'I"e 1 `sA 1 I I • • i pE t i 1 1 1 t } \ w Z ft 11 �j l 1 t 1 I i w , ,^\ 10 t r I a 1 .t E'I t I O r 1 X , ! t ! , S t 1 Po W O , c• i I i v J 11 r 0 It I t 1 1 1 r! i � 1 1 t {` t 1' !t ' i Z` + 1 v� y` j f f ■ 11 t 1 /a1 W t , \., p\ r D 1 , r , i F , } ;'" all •V y ',. , E + co a j i , J ,t .. i } i Fi j r `r \ ' i i 't T co co -'' 1 ,f;;, t t )I I .f , ■ E Pt a , ,I` ®:t , i c �r0 ,, iI 1 1+ , • "f " v c io �_= 1 I � �1 WC AZ Om ; �Il�ii 't r i ' fit, r q, p1s ti- It It a I 1` v , . , 1 1. !i t G R 7 (( ti j , jt < I #om))�p _'! 't,' t, i i t ,� t ; t 1...'1 yr } i i i t C I i FA e 81 CCCCJJJJ m \k t / 1 t i N A i O fill , w it '! i 's ( S 11 rr1 41 i ,F I 1 I D9 ilt , i j s vX ° a I i b i ■ i I , ,Y 1 �'� t t tt o n 11 �;;:! -•_"+: 'ir�i > s O + i ' 11 1 ,y! _„tf �ti ti t N . 1 ii i i n W t - 9 r i ,_ va m�i 1 E Ili 'i ,1 ? 3 f t f ; '' j'p1 ° C' / SI6 E ; iF 88 ;i l ; I l l o i 1 p , , r rt O 1 a 11 [ t , C O ■G s i C i m 'G i Jrr it i i mm j 1} :i 1 ! r i i i i N I t i , , t i f i f A j 1 t t d i j 8 t t Z / ` 1! i }. 1 1 l ti (/f (777 i t O i e } r.T j j [k� le t? _L ; II f.♦ tt t! ,, i , 1 3 ' Y 6 ` m 111 I CI i ? { " ^\11 I F tl ;' -D-I j1 It i 3 t d Y , ! E 3 _I J i i 1 1 c 'I1 1 1 ! t i i I , 1 1 t f l t t ; , t i 1 1 •�' r Ps m t . I r , ' t a , ©1 ; I i ; ( i ; s 1 % C------` 1 ; ; 1 1 '\ ice_». I 111/' i' \,,'� I I t�t t t ! 3 `! 4 d i 7 O .,�I/ �1 y 1 j i i i \� • } ti .% j I 'r?t ; ti 'j '!j t� ,� ,�t bi e ,tt {ff� (\ "� % 'rl, rl fi r �1'•} kt' i i t1�1 tj ; ! t \,,H;.) 1 �!1 t i 4 r , 1 l 1 7 f....., } d \©'� / \\;',‘,' ` rtr ! i' ' , r +a „� +I a + t i v e r1 I °� r ! ! Ili 11 J i l k i l t S i \ i ! D , f X , ; -''{ { !.t t EC t r r� 1 R 1 1 1 1 (/-- t P r ..r.f t ;:. 4 '2, t -i)\ilt`` t i f t 1 I I I . l: -�i X \ tX 1 , t 1 1 r r/11 i 3�j1 r, � ! f j +i { 4 0 i 5 -- i Y11� ', t j 1 \ F jt t 1, 1 I i t l , 1 ', ,.1€i !!y 1f1�' r 1 1 1 , > ! t i .�' i , t w\ t , � ; 1 ,illi ',1 i , i „/--N\„, y I. l § t t ;t IX ! 7#I! i I t !� 1 i 1 4 I li !d 3 aA.. Yi 1 ➢ O rr .+ S, I j4 I i /y FFICi 1° a I t ■1 !! t l i i 6 1 �7 n { ! t t,, 1, NV/jt t i i 11 1 r ? i i 1 1 d'; •I ,F 19 r AI 1 1 j x1 i Y�! 1,r;t F \ {{ 1 1 1 3 3 �� F ar +' 1 t1 i / 1 i1 // O •1 , t i,,,,,,•/772,,,1 , 1 a t v �,1°r.v11 �D° _.�_ i I vv 2L i �) t' f }.; 7 I II II ( 1• vi I I 1, .11 ,---'':,/,, 1 1 !f } 0. I' 1 1 1 I j i t 1 XJI ` A j t IJ 1�r( t �T t 1 E F II lto i 4 1 + ! F f 1 \t s { // ;'.., 1 11 4,4 '.i • f t r /, f 1 t t \ ♦ l\ ' 1 I I / ':')11„;1:1;;;1111,1, i j ...'I.fl 3 ! I 1 E 4 g s, i# 1, la f 3 r will i i ! i i f \ ! a t f 1 ,. J i � k I I I j F {A�r d 4 t f� 3.' t 1 i C '�' `, # ' ' 1 ' I ' rl 8 It t ^ r I i /S\ 1 1 t ! f �e �y t\ \ , 1 1 r/ X — lad 7\7 Y • 4M rr j y � ft 1 k 1 ,vi �T 1 }{ I i it I ,'k ! 3 E !rJ 3 ' t P d O t Ic / ; Iii . .� i al r 1� \ i i ,i it I , , 11' w i s ,' �� _ ,# . ,;t 11 L. [;� � `�. \ x I i 1 f , , i t t i t i t �., i tt i! \k tt t y ! t d F i f j I , \ --� , I 1 , , t + t + r a r t , 1 1 i 3 ,.„,„,r,„" t t , 1 1 t , i i 1 1 X 'ti t i t, I j : ! r� it I p' .71 ---'---„„- .... ... ', \\ f ix•h`, \ j'�1. is .1 i+t 3 ,l \i t\ LI '1j7 I , it + t ! I i i z t i r i ! Pt _ \ 61 ii �, j M1 ! /!Z \ 1 , S 1 j 1 1 li 1 I tii 11j , 11tI. i i , �.� vv , r !1 t i f i 1 I t t I Ii i i P \ `I E i t ,tl t i , I.11, 1- 'i 1 4 I I i p , , r i i 7 s' ri e v v' 1 v + 1 1 t v WI t 9 , t 1 \ \ , , 4 22�YYi lilt,p j I it I jl 1 t i i Ct !F: t \ i ,\ \ ! l 3■ 1 i t I t Jlrffr,. X Y ,f i i 1 \ 1 4 �� t ti�t� I , i �t 7 1 7 ; WI !1! 1 f , t 1 i � / F ( l i t t \i :�, 1i �t� a ? 11 r'' ; 1 II 11 ; t ( „ 1 > 1 t 1 i l k , P I , ( t 1 1 1 8 , t t r 1 ?N� .a y i t i l j f t i t 1 ` t t I 1 '\.;” i t J , i II i ; , 39,6' r ., �, r1 ( t t, 1 1' I t^ 1\17 o t , f t 1 f. £ „ t ! i i P J1 i t 1 1g D l + Y t,�i t 1 4 f j i i i ) t %•�1 t t a t i , I i �\ � 11? r 3_II 1 I i I'I :. I 1r f j 1 .......\ �1 t 1 1 1 A \X N 3 rti''f\ i d ft I!' �i �t f 11 1 1 1 1, all it t \I 1`l1 \t i 1f1 C t I. ti F'ti i i 1 r i \ I * 't f l 1 r X y 1 i'it i t i t 1 t �1 ! t l t ..i �-'r/1 i 1 jt ! i I i Y ; i , t tr ,...,} \ , 1 , I i i C I t i 1 •li I i rl a t i , , It 1 i i '4 i ! F 1 , it 4 t i J 4.::; 1\ 1') 11 ,411,/ 1I ! t t+ i �t fl I '1 i r ri'i tt 111 1 ra ylI\, 'ir I+ ti ii t _It it 1 ddd I j it z D r1 )) mot; ]f 1! ij i'.to 17) iI IP+Ir P !I i 1 F P O ^ Ft j ) }M1� AT i 1 I i if j , I , + 1 4 c.O 1 Z S1t ” fi t Ir 1 1 t j t f 1 !I 71 s"A� ! t it `��r�'• \ 2 f t ! 7 I O i t1•�fl1 �L� rt ��; 1 r t i 1 i I t�i e"-� 1.i i , „ i .1 t, i , (\ I�. 1 \ , Y 'i l 1 i.. ! I !a 11 ——�1■�.1�� t I 1 J ���•� 7 • �Ie6 i� I i t V ° _,- MATCHLINE TA 24+75, MATCHLINE STA 20+75, SEE BELOW a o m , SEE SHEET W3 m gD z < -v III y0 p_< O_ w pw 7 1 oil _, U iJ U z 0 r- „ z P O v z j ° - z ___ ail 000000000 000 000 00 0 0 -4 OD V O1 (T A W N O <O OD V O! Cn W N e1 N g, rn m rn co x ao �T Co m rm 03. n N c m al al c oa fZp ni X ° ; rn ,, m °; o N z NI z 4. X o Z ITI W m m 6, rn g p w m m c0 n z z w m t om° n = v +G a --1i z n A _2 z m o —I O 1 fn MI- 0 n!n a Z z C o m xi rn 111 r z ; m o z r= u� §* c r11 Oz C v Ca 1 O ,r,.< m _ ; o D m m w c m cn x ,1 2 nv D x n z rn c "� mo u'm -I-Im xi m x o zv ^"�o O m to 0 m m m r `'i\f X v Z O m Cr:'� 5 z m ,— 0 0 z z r- m o9 N A o V LAYOUT: W3 SCH B PATH: U:\Brem\ProJscte\plants\8954-HOSC\238-8854-001 Wtrlinegy0lxovTrail\995wa\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterJul DATE: Thundcy,July 12,2012 7:29:49 AU D X11" 0yd� evv\v„e`v ZI1A133HS r' , �1��wa �!' '''i\ 0 \\Ma ���1 1�- e�I "I''', dt ` 4 0 } t � v®v� 1 E1 �'1 lil � , � a ,t � � i i � . ��XLZi�r` 1v, 1 . z i� i i I I 11 i i Y4 S ‘91--1.1 111 � ',,.‘,C° � ! tl„„� 1 4 1 x k X Y �� l 11 i tat 1' i \VA + i 1 t y i i ( � \, '� 00 e iv,Y,7,,,\\,-iv A 71 a 1\ �� � � II, v i !� � � i � � i 1 � � vv `i 11 of� t Y „ I i V ` t r` . 1 i l k 1 �1 1 1 ! 1 t }.� Y Y \ i 1.3,} alt ,, i e .v� i I+� l , t i s i r'1 i 1 i T l \ \ # 1 ` 1 A ! f 1 � 1\ \ } \\ i 41 C jt4 � 11 } � 1+1 _.4) 1\1‘.,1 1 ! ! 1 t\ N\ \-'T b\\t`}\". �S'Y .\ \\ \\I\ J !j I r P , , t f 1 i t p .\} \\:\ V t vv v A 1 v 1 v v \ v } �, v} , t1 I l i 11 i 1 Lid 3 1 t A A 1 t 1 t t i'f /� 1 1 t t= ! 1 X 1R I ''''l At t �V;�\ h�4 t,\ 7�x\q\.b\ \'+t Y,(, � 3 1 f 1 } IP.t ' i� Y F 8 1 � ! t� i i � � {r � A a\ \ l \ ® *\\'\,V 1` 0\\\ \X,141`jz�{t} \''-' \, YY, \t 3Y 11\1!1�1 1 t C ( i r 1 1 X I 1 i 1 ` Yt `tl :q k \ 4 \ pp fi 1 4 Y 1"'', 4 t i 1 1 ! i I i J': \y A �{1 ti\1 \t 1 1 i t t i \ i + Ia l i.:� Y � i i I ! � tj } \ 44\r i '' \ \k::i®\' t^�tl Ill lit i" Y 1 i R 1, \ i 1 I 1 11 1 i '..::. ,? ! i t t i , a r t 1 t i ,�'�� � i Y \ 1\i! ! t'i tl (� ; `1 \ i i Y 3 f!{t`� ( 1 1 X f Y i I'"_._ gA 1 y \1} 1 I t ( \ Y Y S t i I���j! f i 4 3 ( A t\ \ itll�ll 1i1i i4 b \\ +\ 4 �ilp / f i t I ! 1 E I f fl 40 111 ?tri ! i.�r r V � Y I S i � r tll! y1i it } y � \1 Ilft f , ! yk V C¢ i d t 1 3 1 ,yq Y 4 �n 9 _l 1!t ( i i l I i j y !1 It11 El i 11 a ' ;., 1 \ /!^\ 'ii .. 1 i 1 i i i 1!1 !4} a9 9 �. 7 \' / ,. '_i Y # i !\ t�3 µ trl 3 i ! 1\°,,,∎l ? \-- t t f t , a i � YI Y � ! 1 \\\\ \1 a i{ y 4 \ 0. R t \\ b \ 9'il,\alt it}tt k _ 1 i f 3 �\ / I i t ' P 1 I 1 I i ! t 11 i i 1 1 f + 1 \t ( \ , \• 9131 1\\`t,lt IY y \ t 1 1 ,. \J' t ill \ i ! t f E t ' , 1 1f y "� -.{! t vt\,.} Y I \ vv Y 1� , \ y l�1 �% i i , f i 3 i l i 1 1 1 1 1 r , ( O v \ ..., \;\0. as tt,i 1`t' wI_ t 9 t i� �, y 1! t I 3 V i t i t ! V a t k r \ i! l\ t A O f 1 K 1 I• t il�1lt tttllYt ll 4.1,\ � i ?\ \ i \ !}} t i I F 1 i l t �, P i t 1 1 1 t' + -IZ A A , i 111 till,t ! 1" ! i t i 6 f'� ^S ' D N , } GY +l1) tli' 413 131 i3 3 I t t i t I 1 3i 4 ! ! 1 !t ! d I 1 \ \1\ A one L A- t,lli il[ �Itl IYl3 ei+ Tit---„, bt \ \ \ ! 1 1 S I E 3 1 i £ t t J l AO m �xG f \ 4 4 1+1 3 1 {1 ii 1 t ,, 0 ,tit t 1 i „,„---111,1l,„d , 1113 t i l l ! CAN 1 d 1 k F k i t 1! r'�fr�, b 4 1 ' i 4 �14 i t t i I P fl \ Y 7 Ill r^ Cl^ 1 ` 1 t\9 11111 161 i !X 143 ', Y r 1 ~ tF! t 1 t 1 1 11 840 t f k I l i 11 R " \ � t l i iiOI! ,f! It ! t i f0 Y \`i \ ! I ;` S a i rM1 (J t f (// \ i F i , �� � i .-11 ,I I;1111 3 t 111 r1 t3 l �� ( M1n a\\\ 1 µI \ : III/ t\\ Rt �1\Y 1 b i I if lti �!'till 1111 lift j Y i! i 1 ; t X I \ i I i 3 S ):11:111 y{, E,++S 3 ! t ' ii 1 7 i \I 411 _( i ! I 1 3 i1 ! S Yt Illl1Di } Ii Iy i ': i t( Y 1 O c\�. 1 gti ill i i 1 j I( ( i t ]1 ` liiliiia ,p 0!!711 iri ^,� � :a / i 1 i 4 a, a' i � ' I a �i i i „''''',/ i l',,, , ! ul , 1 1 ,,! 1,11 1 , 1 I HIS m t + t 1 iT i t \ ;! I (• r• t raj1111� l s 1, �.! 1 i i i v r s vv { i - i � e�P1I�f ?t D1+! 1 T'1 V4itt� 1 11, \j 1 D .. , i I ',11,1 1 1 3 1 ` 11 1 i t+ r ' 1t! i i!1 1 1{a ;.„,,,,,111,t 6 3 i}f 1 t1 y P E F, b # ,l tlktill ,IiN � #,i\\ \b i i N r v/ Y It 1 9 F �: �- t 1 p t 3 f I l�! • M1 D a 111 111 v It \ tI M\ \ ,\+1\\\ \t1 it 3 _ 2 .Y,i '.i of h 11, i ! i 14 11 , ' ,.Y t t o`tEfl i 19 S e i 3.f i tyro i a l f ! t l l l t F r 1E1 t04t1Y } � 4 \1.\< Iq i N e f alit) {,4 } i'�\k aY'.Yl it, if 11, O \X j l�dll !I it t.� �lt tad of��1 i i I ; � 1 ! l i j ,i fF V/ /I`, � ' y \ 1 € Z �J t.! �c { aNFppi lit 11?a9 i 1Li f Y I I t l 1 \ i ! d i t 1 i t 1 1 7 t 1 } i > O ,}� al 11� 3111 ,, ,, 11 i t I 1t ) f Nmo=m ' f 1'j ltY V1 j j}}It`� ,tl 3 l�I1 i fll 1, l , Ill �Y it t I P1 Ilt t' i WoaJr \ ,\ IIE TIli1 1 !! F1, 1 1 ! f ' itfl 1 . 1,E F 1 : / I W. D i- i lit,ill i tt 1� ;11,T--- i III;t 1 f t _._� , ! 1, , t , � i � � 1 1 t � k 38 � �°\ m t! ti1111 ,t 1 !x v1 r 1 1, / i 1 i l t t i ,` r 1, ! +yam , v < s till OO i i ..wp f a r a r t . � 0 �mD2 Y ( I�� liilir ail i +ai `r ,..._.....,ai1 tlij A_ !?t R1i ilt3a i4 o R i {131 I( ! i. 1, Y ! }} 1, 1! Ir O �,\ 11, it it t 1111 dd lY t "�1t IJI O Ps f ,lt!Ell t It.r-,i I 3} {, t 1, t 'R t o ' , 11 A a m ve i d l r 1'11 i Y l t 1 � 1 1, i O ( t IJ 1 11j1 Il \\t\\� Y1, a 1.: / 19' i !it i n[ 1 I !.i liiil i \4\\ tl o I! 41 „f 'f 1 !p � � I 1131 + \ \ '� 4 1w� © , t t 'j d! 1t ' i 9 nr a 111E \ 81 1 E ' t t t t /t I��Et 4 1 j 11 '1,j1, t % ' f to t ! 1 ' ! f t ' ; tP ;Sb 1 , i ' , 3 1 1 i' t , a 1 ! 1 d Yt ti i i s 1 4I�I511 ! ! i 13{`.� i / Ifti� lrlil tadY 1 � + I 1 PF : Q P N , a 1 i 1 a X'1 t Y f 1 1 1 t t aI i j 4Y ▪'A NF }it i -^ t I 1\ 1, i1 4 Y} 8 4 9, {I t 1, 1 / P s t , � i t � ) �i ; ` , \a\a i 9 �+Y, iii 4 \+1 i i t t i-,.! 1� , f 1, !l' at.i`\ 1,Y �iin A t t A ! 1 / 1 { t , t t X l tSY b a1? o.. 1ti111,11 t a ( l ! '131 P i Y II , 0, }dtp'- 131 1 \ . 1,t a ! i�a f3 ! t f\'m 1, t a !i 1 /t 11ti �,:v 11` t 4}{a\&\\\q,\\i ..i-) T 111 0„,\,,,\\,;,,,,,\‘',:;\:\‘,2„,,,9VII t i 1\t�y\\`\ hl I..i 144 Jii f1 11, }a1 tY1 !1':) {l '� 1 11,?/11 a1, 1 1 j/III J'' R '\ s ` } I9� 4 1{ i ! t 11 ' 14 r £ !1 + ! , 1r j i l \0.y l " Y.�t,l i\1\I !\M \\ Y 91 u ..-,.. 6 t t F{) t Dii f i " i t 1 1 1 1 \ }+ Y1 ) ,\t\ ,,,/' i` !i it' i 'r'{it, i,ptl 1 iri j fit It Yt 1 ii r � � _...v Yt `y � vvv 44 td},ivvyv vi i�,iiiit�ilw �' 4 t Y a .,7 v v v , ( r t a.., t � 1 \ 11 \`\\ it,} if}t 1 � � 4 lYd yy \ / ? 2 S.1, b 1, }t Y t t f v i 1`1 Y\\\ \ o o.\~/ ! i \ Ii d £ it 1 d II lY 1 1 1 j1}t 3 l t t a j j t lI \\ II i ! i} \ \i} ,,da\Y S,t lIi t 11 d f l l j \\\ i t.,`\\i\ `\0.9M\"'\, \\\\\\\\ 'a tAl t '...d fl t ' Ytt k a t 1,1R.;t , ! d ! '1 i f' �t p��f t St 9 a t i 9 1 t t 1 1 i t 1 1 11 1 !1 1\\\\ \\\\0\ @\j'y ' , j k I jt { a t Y , ! Ii 1Y�i ��i 11 t t f 1, 1 d Rf R \ at } i\i ` + 1111 tt)t 111 I I t i 1\ +1 1 1!it \ `,,,f \t '1\ \`y\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\,,\`\\ .i_ {31 X I !4 ft l 1,l ' PY '1 i 't /tf it i t II l' x1 2 ' l 1 1 R \i 1 \t y „, 1,1 CJ W 14 1 I V al \\\` \\ \ 0\ 4 \`v1 7 E , j , 1 1 , i . 3 f t j sill I t t \ 1 4 V 1 t i \ \ \\\1 \ t t if ! t t Y f i i 1 � ! 1 1 ! `t } 1,N/ill a fO O\t Iti} ♦ \ , \ \ ➢\l l\\Y\\\\\\\ \ F t ! , i , ! 8 I 1 1 f t t g 1 }. is _ h i vv vv vv V f 1 i 1 1 r 1, t t Y t 1 J t� \\ ;CI,1 �,'i la\ ai,. ,� `t 1 � 1 � _ , ' 1, /1 i t IYI YV S1 > Y i � \\ \ \ I 1, 4 1,�Y i t\ } i 1 r d ! I i I-14'1'1 ) ! ! t £ l , \ \\,, , l l\ \l \t\t I ' 1 I t i \1}i , f l } 1 1 1 i l i t i ! 1 1 1 I I t a t \.�', 11\ i i\t \ 4--- \, \ 1 4 1 B t 1 1 t i l t i 1 i t P f t t Y ! t t t a 11/1/1111///:''//1 \\ i \ ml i l i l i \ t \'\ i\4 V\ ,b 1, t \l ;1 1 S f t i ti ! t j t t a t`FJ�... t ' \ 1 1 4 \ 1 }i \ 4 t t tl t " A t \\ \ f\l.\t`'1 cal:\ l tl i\ \\\:\\}1'4 9 �1 1 1 i 11 1 Y 0 1 1 1 '! a1 1 t 1.4 1 P 4 \V i t D l a a t.t� \ \ j Y 4 t t f V 1 1 l ! ' ,fit i t o tf f Y a'!1 0 1 1 }`1 t t t f )! 1 t l 1 1 !1 f t V } ( 9341 1 !11111 i \ 3 \ \`1lli 1311 alit R 1,b fail 1X 1.161 E1)11 R1 dR t , �f1 R i f ,t 1 m-t t 1 1,1 1 i 1 1 1 f f t a i! t, S , \\\d Up i t I t , l , t ! t R t 1 , 1 1 1, P f } t i 'V r �\ i 1 t a l i t !z Y Y t t i t a r a l l a r i i t t } 1 a r ? d I 1, It 1 4 �i t 1 i t i t \ 6 i ! i i I k! i t l i i t ) 1 at D I ! f i t i i , Y ,, d ""�-'`�\ 1 / t I l I i, l \ \V i 4 1 i i l ! i j j I i i t , ii 1;1 , i it t/ j i/ ) t Y I !i)t a / \ I £ J )i lit l 1, 1 4 1 4 1 \_ t t i 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 i t a I I)1, a 4 } I /I/t t f 1 if/211,H t tai 1 jI }YI � i X Y 4 1 hill!t i �� t f f t 11 , S 1 1 1 1 t j F d 1 t l f t t ,rl�. a+ + lie t ,t yl 1 I a I,! t I\i 1 a 1,1 1 k } !i i i 4 \4 It 1 V d\!1 i Dt at a/,? t ,1 a1 fa 11, t 1 p1 fa ,f f' 6 T d / V 1 I I t I I it , ! ! 1 F t i } /lj fig■ 5 1 � I ., 1 1 I f 3 !t i t V ((NH( V 1V 1{\\ ad i �`,Y a X !t ! 1 Xt 1 11 ! ! ! I 1 � � 1 / /////,,,,y,,/,, �� / 1 A. i i ' a , 1 1 i jj} 11111 {411 -�' t i} t i 1 1 �t j\ i! t ) X17/.1t it 11 11 ,}i t! j ,{ l 21 i, 1 \ \( 1 1 6 V I 19 9 1, 1 1, t i 1 1 1 1 V i , Y 1 £ t f f ! 1 f `\ , R ! It 11,\ , Y b Y L ( a d 1 1 1 ! , � � \ t t\ 11 ! W !,1,+! ;i j t {1 ti 1 1 1 4 t Y i i i C t t 4 * 1 1 ,t ti 1 11 1/ 'f 1,, J I q, O l i l t 1 l j } 447. / / 1�� , x f l 1 1 1 l 1, I t( i , , i � ! t a 1 f J J t, p , /'' C J , i t i t i t I 1 2 \ 1 t i ! 1 1 t V $ I Iitf t , ;Za g , ,tilt i i E �1� 11, AT i i ti, 11: 'R/1 t�!' 1 y 31111 1 11 i E 1 IL:, „i'! I i f 1 R 3 t I S ��`'� i t i. et J i! ,i d' I �i 1 i' i it�i � ;;lit i Xa,' 1 1P i 1 ' ����� I 1 F , 1! 1 � � /J, /,!:/ / !i t ill Y t! i9t \,... 1 0111111/ 1/1/// / 1 � 3 t i ! j .., � 3 a t1 jPti !t 1 A 1,}i i ! y t ,/ /..� l t !! ft tI1F I til 3 1 1 , �-.._.,i 1 t� I J 1 i` a(/////1/1/!1 \Y 1 1 1 a i 1 �` 1!� / 3 !f j 'i Yt l � t Rt t!i l�3t`t � � t f,t' Y It ! ± Y Ili i ' �\7�`✓ '��'�...._._ ... !� i s it l t a a j 1 t } !i ! t !f i t f ! t R � � � '"••� � i a ) 111',/,/c7.11 ,7\((111 t I i 1 t l t R t i l l 1 a i t ! ! F i t t! a '! r 1 f J `O`._./.-.__ 1 a 1 t ! JaS � t t1 t l, l j } ! jt lt !1;111 t1 /; tf f a t,1,11/,1, 11, tv a 1111�Ilh(,11 tt,11tr1 ti1,1 �• i !ill!��i�� i f 1111�� 1 1 1 11 S a \ R i t1 I ii 11 R 1 1 \\\ r 1 i i~~ 1 I 1 t a. ! !i , i f l J 11 1 q \ l a t i i 4 1 t t ! ! a 1 Y \, 8�! ,vvv 91 ; lit: ; ( I , il,t ; ; ll� 1 (\ I( 'I�III{1/11,�1ir /` l 1,w. gg f D I I y ( 1 \ , 1 1 1 4 \ 1 d'„11 f 1,to m t 1 , / 3$$�� � a 1 11 ,�,Ib vv"vvw,ww4vg i )II vv ,1 ;j/R1,aaaJa atlIt t 1a vv,� " a 2 C 11 i { tI i t lY t \ \\ \\\' 1 Y} 4 t ,t ii t` J!t1,t t1 k ^t ..".+.. 0O� !t`R \t 'av \\\\\0\ \\M+`\\`o``Y�lt i\\I\'�qb it t ttt 1t ii 11 ki/1Rilfl it1i1�1' ' ` ...w.\ ii 4 aftf f!Rf 1 t ,., .._,.�✓ 0. \\ \\\+\\ \\104!1 lli 111 Y i\ E\ it 1£1!1) I i b}I�ti t\\ry.. \Vii ilia 4 1,1 t, \1 \\ ,\ \ till till , r i t f,I1 11 i tl a l t `9 a9 V4 ` 4 \1 iiti ati 3 f t 1t1}i }}l i tJ J i! 1 vi Y,vy,�,tal ;tl=ti\11,,,itY i , 'Iaiii([11111/,ta 1f fir_.,+ al \ M'Y ! ! t! 1 i!i }�:: a\\ \4 j1, f x111 i }t f1,+$i if i 1' za 2 __ 1, I3�' ,II i _ \ ? }\ !11_l;_„ I, R'` _ o =x MATCHLINE STA 13+95, SEE SHEET W4 o arm -< .-v CO CI ▪ F En Ow I zo 2 o9 O F� m FIN :C3' .411- � v „7_.. T Z 2 o r.,� uUU o � 1- 000000000 000 000 00 0 " * irl, „, <__n'1 C r., OD V O' CT A W N O r0 W V O' (P ? W N Q ♦/ °��[` o` n o' rn 00 C' °; 0' m c1 o N Z c orn `. N a c a l 0 = m N 9F ; °z o: : D9 m FA 0 cnE m z§ g % 4 cc' oz g c3z m m a, N Z c r O z I - Z 1 z n q _)i z FE "TO -, m nE m m nN 2 c m o Z 0 \� J" 7 5c ; - _.§ p (pin', c "�* � ° �' P "ate Z lee' � � �� /'"� A z _ E „"', ° � 2 � � cmi� <K2, � �� Z LI m D x "� ' rn ��. z Nm m Nx O D v W 1 ,m..:. F 1. r , m GD m Ki `'' r- DD a Z �� m m �D m czi 7( CD ," Fr; x m m Q13 x ° z z m �DZ t -, I a z z m �\ a o 0 Z z r m U o C0w A O V LAYOUT: W4 SCH B PATH: U\Orem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01y0iecovTrail\99Svice\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:30:00 AM V A ". Af` H.'�C 1�STq 13*g5 /` ; ;T,` f, 4,SEE N r ` / ' `l,Jt rt1111/17,itf`lti'1 J 1gtrW + I I G l l r t t r f/1 f , ! 3 +J / j} p tt Jtt k l j ,0/Jl �9 /*/ F 111 It t ffjj t/ 1 / /1 / r t 1 f J i t f ,i A 1 1,!/Irff F, ii! J J/tit f 1 1 11/! 1 ,J/ n I /`/ 1///i j j/r ` J` t ,,,,,,,/,,,,tl 1 1 /Jr /I//£// t!l1`Yl ],f )I ff J ( F l\ Jt r /r Fr/���A�l� ff1//tjtJ fl is/ 11/ r,,jltrfJ itf i\1 \i �� li// , f/ I dt1 7 v '` / /j/t`fr/F`/,f flltfl IX , J i I t j t j t i t o 1 jt P /f, 1 %, ! f f 11 1 rt / /, n /////1'/{l/lr/J f J r/ al I j,t�i,,t,, 1 2F //1 ll/it/;/ , //,tf/li tfr` ItF ; ;4',<<v,v y vv,,� , r f 1 1 / z) t t/ 1 11i ++° v r !tf l,///c,/,///,',/i/ //t /// '///,/„/r/ Fti ' r „loll, F i Y \ t t / f ;',/ t',!1 1 y j 1`fr } i i < l rr`1 � // / ` a tl `1ff f tat`/ 1 A /t/ //`//ft r t/` ///7//f tl ,11 t( I A\ } i i i + 4 y ✓ ./ //j i I j 4\d\ t\ \,\ 9 2 A y ///j/////////1///////1/rt t f /t / _;,/ /` Y „V))) 1\ \ \\t'\�, f\ 9 > Q� F1 / / r 3 Ill/1 l/ J _// // t ,I/(1/,,;;_,// if ii 6 2 O x 8 ///7/2/1{�/ rt }r�/1 1/1 1 ft ftr t / 1/ 'r f Ift 1F/J ; r \ Y 1\j ' , ill t:f -Y f WIN 1 1 t{j i i { 1 ld! � L f 0 Z r / 1 / /` rl i ijry }i� t i x // f tJ r //'!1 11 /! +F`/ /f` { 11111171_,, \/ \\\ \4 1 t 1 1 / i tf F t t'//f/t/t Aff/rt7/#/ 7, f 14 t t ,I t I ) f3 FI /J / i/lt1/tA/1 t/J`/fi!f//+/tf ,'Ji/ /` 1(/J O / ��t}lt/fl))tS C\ .»�/3/tf)ff til F1F itJ/ I//// / //! / i €/ /11 if f y 1 J t l / /1/tl�ll+,t 1,ft 11/f'/////1/ 1//f 1 d '!t ;e5>4'/1, if' f } \e\t\\\\\1\\F \\\1 f 1 ) i I i D f l J/ P//\ // e 4 I 1 \t \ ` I JJ 1 : /�1 I i X I t/ �! !' / / i �/ itl /\i jJ/,° D r d IP //f////O/ %f- /\// 1 t d 1 1 /J f\{lj i A111 �/f/r°F/// to/ f f / // t /ft rtt !/ /''' t \ y 1 t W=33= t1 / t � 1 r WOE �- d/ l,II P,/ F / / / . 1 p "� 1 ro /' i/0/40,2/ti / r - v i 1` f/ / / t t 1 v ap r / N A O m i t' „(1.,/1,,,,(////7,7/1 /// // / 1 +/ l/ -7.31 t , `' 11 I i / --/ /12� fJ f' 8 (y C ,.///,..2,//,,,,//r r/r/ �� 1 ! 1//1p1 1/-� d r �((t77 V O� ---''''%::"/2///./i/N 4/T 'P' f ,.„,�i i\' /1 \ ALGA // i' D t f/f \t\>a 4 4 1 t d oo -o //: i tT JJ t k f �Jr ,-- /ly /f / ap m w' + / F J '77 7- '�f/ / /f -4' '(''' '( f~~ 'D ' . r` 1 //f B N // tfi Jr / ,1f m / .' m l y /r 1 d r \ i f t / 1 k yyy r ! \ r\i �ti »..� +� t Zc Q - - jam° ;/ s. in � fly~j a ..~� Z 2, ztm F Sr m r/ ”' r 6 0 O Z ///.`. 7 1 i z co z� z Z0 � I 1 ,./ :--4 G v H / r 61.4 1r O n 1C7 6l c--- 0 m r A O R—, u 0 o o cI1 t_ Z 1, c c z rte' � � - � N 000000000 -000 000 00 0 Z D O . �. -__ , • O1 oo °a O N Z 01 1, N z ,� m 171 ��_�� i Z c> m xo = ti 2E m ` °z,2 ti v m zA C 0 Z m m m c °' o W mcD -1 z mu) < m < ztto n Z OZ D C c 9 o m z 'TO I ° � m ^ �cn �y O pN a— oT M (n Z C '�° -- 3 to 1 , m ,,...... p .5...to 69 6 2 m ci r Z m m V i r m izy r r W m m m m v c x 9 g y= < CO v0=1 O Z o p W n i y m ��z to c o mW !A O f/1 m x1 r ° c zv N ra f T10 m_r, Z m a� m m m �� Z 0 r_ m m n czi -m r _ m m tn o v z zz m CO; c D_ Z F O q CO Z Z m V o• LAYOUT: W5 SCH C PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\C1lents\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WWIneOlyDiscovTrall\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE Thursday.July 12.2012 7:30:12 AM V 1A1 `` fl'� /I))i\11�11 7.i x l?!t / Z 1 S t J g ' �MgxTrCNCINE STA //////r tJ JJJI t'i`1 C TTT1 1 t!f t ww�b iii�i rctl J{ �rr1J f£r{ I £ £' / J' j F + /////J /( A t i r t Y t \ 1 9 !!r t f l x J t r x tx A /J J .. / Jr Jf J f 3 if'x�x/d/1 tj11 t ��� J / ! t f � IJ f Jr J.. ///6��}`1\ !J Ill iJJJ i II/ 1 3\ i'l3 t fx J f t I] ; E !yp 1 j f ... 1 £ 1 /+µj� 1 if J t 7 t £i x it� JJ 1Jx C ,, r' r / t i ` r l J / C)t0 rf rFJ; r ! / t i __ \\:;)) f Jt ' fJ£1J ; 1j // r J / '. / ° 1 1 fj fi// ,f! 1/117/11Z///1)11)1)::' f ff�._. Of- x 1 xfit t f !l ) / l Vf '9 J J r s t t r +f F 1 ,r / �� xr' J r£ fJ" //,,,/,//),/:/ ///11 ty � O t j J, C c°,// Jt f�fr Ff/ i if a ftli r lrr rr, i ! { f i J `;'} t~.._i i t, cr i (0 £J ! t t ")///).1)llxr i.. J t t 1 ��� rp�r+ f l f f ' f Jj1 ) xi .. p t ! ! i r //j yD J t..^' J 1/}ff J/ i xx to Jf f 3 Jf alF+/ / 1JA Jt Jl ffl 1 m / J j z i t Pr , s C/ //J/f ,Jf / /J J/J iJ ,1� ! 3 �s xl Ji r i O FJ 1 a .�/ / i f1 ham..t.++Y Jf''' ;/ `�/ ? f �/Jt J/ f; 1 f// / { + P/ "'••.•.... J JJ + 1 / 7 t if it A 1,/J /i/ ft�J r Ji t xP / Pt if „.r /d C T f/f✓ /,/i F r { 'r/l f J !f f € ', x J E I'� J J e a r1 i t � � A v //I 7x ;�/,1J, / /J x J v ',F ) _ _ _ iJ n o o rl d __�/ t r tJ �t � r w�Jxr i i f a .,),)„/„„,://,,,,;„/r i/ f /' i% r i r 1 , ft / /- ---''44;.- c; - l/e il Q q','� 4; t 1 f i Y ` J J ! (/1 / J/ Y t • �` f 6< „i. i -i I ? fJ �/ f ( 2 i(/ ' ffJ e //Li:L._>< j^SRI l�/ / y { F ���— ., x J""P/'' t i FJ' J fJ °.. `t N Z , // l \\ i t x' f N ` i 111 3 '`O j J J t Fi 4 1 r/"r �iJ! / 3 1 t 4 I ((/�x� f1 ,»....m T '/ l O f, 2„);):://')////),/,'//)",' / / F j b I --1 / (D ,Y6Y r..y G T dr f l f -1 f f // rl v °, D D'� i t .�/' r r > //'",)///7: (n it y v, ,..... / 3 i f/i 11 f ff t_..P' f/ \ , of f+ ((.W ti 1 1 �.,.� i (11/1 1 J t, �i Za \ t l JF p *'� f i f J / t d J ' I gyp` 1 J ,, J J 83 r"lJ�/ / /f yJ 3 3\\ t.x// ,/ i if !1� JI:/ / F6 if. ,g;,),),,,./ b` '`4' fJ �� r' J ! / I 3 1 it j /✓ `D 4�'„! i j p' '.i��1 w // `^�.., if \ £ £F t) t f j w / �i \ / i f ,£ / vI £° i i A ( ' '/ /._..... tii °y lr r 4O° f f t t f ,t „ t 1` / 1 }/ ! i 1 / t P,I ®}"'a RYA"^( / //f1 tl I 181 t /I) )t - i pf x11 d/ 1 n�\`F�� f fit J/Jx Ff I {l � \ g I / 1 r+. / rx i / �� 8 t r t J t r�_.; r / b\ ' t i /' lx it + /£i J r N A i 10 T / J 3 3 r .Y x / J t r°/ �� 4 �.,./ b f r t Jff 8 A� !I ! t 3 i ,^ I ' "t 1� .. w t t if ti i I' i ' l ,f l/ t.. ;d '.! {1 J f t M £''),/ r I „ - � /G” lA/ i �/ xa! C G W 1 J` 1: ,/ r f t: 1 ,/ //,--„, fi r ) / f”+r ri Z n w rJ ,ff , i j .-r, t/ J �, �Qj /` fJ Jx f / JJl J J K F, ';' 3 J r f I-i I J �/ /1f lif a/ / -_�rt -----1 a !f „..._,. / ��_. � [ i ! J i /: /0 {/ q wr f i 1P 1 t 1 s is y � N Z r 1 ) ,J J IF- ,r/„,,' /r` r , t ,\ l , .. CJ wr+r �1l\ !l 1 /x J . ��J €r .�� � 1 t \1 !d� J� t f f 1 f _ �, Z / rraI £ 1 r — r .a-. '....° '.r/�! /,,ri tJ 1� ,^'j 7 ? 1 i t\ ♦4 ! t ���i£i � d //� :..r ' Nom,.-' 3 r i t- 1 + f t t 1 ,1,, / I J' < i 1 1 p1 t t r''' rx �.,:�r/J r � ^-� .'. � I � r/ J 1 Fl t •'t t x i t/ . , � ! r/f�,/ :/ / rr' + �; ;,Flffi 1fi/rA 1 fJ 1 '� t Y ...a/r I �! ..^,31\^t 1 1 3 i 1 S 1 4 1'(1 tF 1 1+ t 1 1 1 r 1St } i , \, t'i d \ tr l \\:, \'‘ \ 1 1 (�; 1+/ Ji ff Jxl '/ )1�,.. N v, /M% 3!+ f,}\ 1\; j t J1 y/ f Y j i YW : 1!t`, , J r i L f +' r £1 f \ i t 3-1 i -------/ f 1! r t i ( f It J1 J ,, 6 \ , mtY F� i x' i 11 n 1 J t I rr«r l iii t i i I 1' ` `e 1 „,,,,,,,,,\i' 7 y i a CO� N �ni t6 Y i !, , "\--/-- �w t i v t Jd �, J r / :://' // m O 5 3/I)l i i ,� VI ( b + A t1 °; F �' xif rit o�, i � /. 1,r m rn p`� � ;; 1� ' � tY Yl v li�v \t t ,� l If & " xim R;1 Z ti 1 itl,£! i /F 9l i ia�i i t / I K .: .r9_ 1t` i ili61,„ t f J v v vb t 1 , £ J i JJ fF � _ i CO � �'r 11 i till J t ■ l v by v �� 7/ rJ xl £ ��___ :Y / G� __ J/ t `^t AYtY A, 1idY� / f t xt 1 t f V Yi y J / I t, F r. m — I M 1)))\\\\,\A d a b l 6 i, I / £l ( \ ft Y�1M ft! 4 J ^\ A C ”! €�~m i �p l\l\ ( .-""r,. i EJ x t O IY i /— 3 t a j \\t '�� J O 3 a 1 l ! a f 3 I l \ p r / s J �. t "/);');1 1 i 1 4\ w�\ i i 3 J 1 t £ t / t b 3 (1 t f ) €f r f 0Yt\ p,t i t „ J/ rJ 1 � Jt 9t \Y ,;;21;'-'1;___,/ 4.i`P.; t i \Q 4 d�t i 1,1 i 4 r\ l4 i I \ f\ i i�h 1� �Jr x� _ {_ __ f d / 1 f 4 J 9 1 X� i 6' 11 4 Y t( �._ J J - ' A / r.„---^ . ;\ s F t ( f S b f 4 l l 4 1 x y \ tff ! t i i t /// 1 tj le\ i `(/j \ f \ I t t( ttit 4�Y iS { 7 ' 1 1 t Yj ) t u \� F .-,�.ry Y b 4 4 t {1\ 1 //s ,,,/ Y + !\ ,i t l // x JJ :t ! -1 t f ri t i 3 Y t i l 1 1 1 ! ;t i I Jf \ f /1/1� 1 1 11 1 ,t 31l K�\ J IJ t \\\,),/ ''',',V\'‘)\/),\'\-\Y i i1 r f J t I /..-„„) J Y \At 1 y �fz i //rt J/t pi l„\ r ! f VI ` f t 7 1 VA p i/ I / i, \ \ Y \ f \�} , J 1 it r l J l vv t J 1 , (2. t to 1 i f t 6 \ £ JJ F Y 1 S d I 1 f f .. 8 W a / i t f J i ;I f xx lJ F # I _ ®.. t J � \ \1 s1+ � j ! ' a 00 ' J lie l' r 1 ! 1 t I .) - /),/,‘)/, ! J 4 4 t! I X x t i \ t t i J l / ! !• x i£J t i,4 t f t i O t H 1 1 1 3 /1 i 1 t 1,_ Y ' x £ r F D J ..v \t x {1 1 1 131 1l 31 j !t Y t 1, ' 3'' r i ; £r `+, i \ \ev t\i i i 1 1 ■i i r// n Oc rx !\ I J f 3 1 \\ fp \ i Y 1 i / t �' �j1 u \1\I,I y 1 t i4 id y /t s /1 f \---1 t`j�t\t �.L t 1 1 i. 1 J / t I Ca b @\ f \\'‘,1,1 i 6 3 i f I F d t J r J 1 IeF i t 9 1 1 !t t J It I Col ,.._. Y'j 1 1 1 \ \ t O i D l 1 i! .1' / /( f 3 ! \ i f I + N t / w \ 11 i 11 i t O . 1 5 4/7^,I/ `'� I �r d P I' t f 9 !y / k� 17 11 t ", r 3 V / �J 1 3 4' t - „! li,{sll l\l+111'11 � � f � ? li i ���� i 1 \ P £ + P ... 41 Iiit \ i\ l Y 1 T4 1 f l t f ; O +r J/ ip r i t t i 4 i l a / \ JJ ! f i t 41 1 1 4 c j f i t !!t 1 �1 I! it // t r'" 4 l F'. i i t I f t i Y { ! 11 4 3{ H i { f' C�? I 4 >�f \ 1� 4 i t ''). d\ I / / i Ei i 8e, f t 1 f i xrJf, t r � OW Ji t �� ii � / ,14 t l l, i l 1 3,4 j ii! t i �' /fJ J 1 1 4 1 0, 1\4 1'\1 1 '.P / i +a/ £/A , \4 t I � , „ / I ' r I iI /rt i;I r t 3 t e } i t l t 1 1 1 4 d, b 9 f i / `„ i i I t "/ !J(+ t/ 1 f t!f i t i 1 1 1 4 4 : x x t l\ x` ! 3 ! 1 J AJ x x�Y b t{ Y 1 1 1'1I^.Y�t t \ E D f r '` / t ,,i Yl`4 1 6 1 ;1 1 1 4 Y t \. i t } \\ l t i F 1 4 1 1 i t \ i f i F i 3 R S� 4 Y t i O I+l N l/ ?/ i�\ t , \Y t l\Y t4 G \}, 11 V 1 \v lit \Y Y r f b a b 1 i t 3 x J f i i £ ill (i , } i t t! i i 3 4 t 1 ! l �v Yt y1 tvYi� ; i tY t 0 { ! y , 4 1 4 1 1 'r f / +i ! 1 \ \ 1 Y 1 l 4 F q i 19 i, . ; V `\ , 4 j I 3 1 \ t t lY\t,Yt \t y l Y 4 P /J /t ' ~\lit\Y\ 1 A l 3 i! 1 ‘� f 1 f� 6 1 1 11t,1d1 i}d t i gi l t16 \~~ f i i i i 1,l 1 iY 1`1 Y t 3 t 1P i A 0. t f Il��Y{\1 ' , ' ” I i i1 1 A bl ,�,.- 1 \ t t i i i fJ t \\ d i 1 d t, \1 ) f 1 3 \ \ 1 S r 1,1 l 1 `t, I i� t J lt,1\i } S i j t t i t ~ 1 I 1 1144 S \i f; 1 Z D y 4 \ t t i ' /i f 1 i d 1\\''M\4 ➢t t„ E !f J 3 1 3 3 Y 9 lY `t 1 4 1 / l 1, }i\ i 9 e f i f ! i i\ f { t w`I'Th ^^�\ 1 \ i t t', 1 t d \ Q1 Z ,\ q \a 1 .,.,x {i t yY\i \\ 1 tI J \S t i i 1+ .+ 0m C \!\ , \\ I 1 f i i I \ \ `�\ \tfY\ t i\1'\1\d\'\ \ t ( E 11I 1 i \ f'i .�l 111 1111 r I� m i l 1 , 3 x Y'. 3 �� t l Y\4 i ,A l 4 1 Y Y \ ti it i ,, t £t , f ! \1 rii r �. � „t vY f 3 ( \vl ftav Y Y J f r r vYt l\ tq 1 ! 1 3 \\\r' ”) tjll,`\i, \\t,M1'\ )".” i \ JI i1 1 -__,. 0 O 2 v , v ' f i iY �idvV °,Yvi Y=,,,=\21,:\t1A t J �1 Y r t i iii °....._ O I"171 lv1 \ r t i t 50 lv Y slit Y avj� 1 ` vi ' i i ( t , v C '( \l n t 1 r \ 1 1111 t t Y,,t i ai\ l i '. 1 i li \L))\1\=, m { Y 1 ! f t i \\1:=„‘1,V=i\ 1 \ t 1 3 f A _� \. t I t I I \\ r ` 1 11 l i t d\\t‘ y l £ 1 Q '� � 4 �, f \ 1tt \ 1 }, G D y0 \ \ ! 1 3 1 !Y, 11J, fx/ i + 1 4\� `C O7 0 J ! i 11A0,\;\'',,,,\,\\\\,\\ .� r � t Y� 1 3 1 r vt l J ��, i f f r C �� q „-j, �,i f � t d t i a ( 1i )t ( t I C i 1 p .i t i 3 0. ! t f I� p 1 I l,t f 1� 3•l 11 D k" 1 \ y i � _ S \ltl t 31e V�J/ / JJ l k S,,\)\q f oc.. z 0 ,1 i f., 3 i 1 - `° O i b i v ,N,'",':v tv� xJ " ' i A ' 2 Z \ , 9i •, I ' i i! w 3 \i ,„� \1 t\`y\11\ t f I ' ); 6 i .,.. Jr...-,V,. v - Ylv r 2 00 , v d f 4 v' v,tv 'r',y'a r „ b i t i l i t\\t 1 t\i t tb d @ i \ J 0 t \ 1, , \ t Y\4 l ! t t I 1 1 1 i 1 j 1\ YP Y 1\\\\e \\t t4 1 ,\Yid \ f, 1 7.. '� '2; i 1 t i ~ ti i , \4\Y\; t\4,tt \ft \ 11 1` i i!( - ,ff O y� i 1 i � "1 \ 1 Y i „,. \0 1 `td 1Y31\t�Y1,Yt1t\4�4 3 l t V Y P\ 1 ! 1\1 4 S t i',) t 3 1 l0 4 "A t4 i � Y J !it\dil i 0 1 �1 t t 1 �,t \\ ! i l!} ` 1\\ !1Yd I 1 Y `3 l \z f �:6 1 ..N'1H�1`d , cv ,N t vz evP S 33 _.., ' y 1f vyy,v 4'bv3 '1 tY �3Nj1H�LdW ■ -`-=M0,3933S v z � 0 ,1 ,, —__ __ OOOOOOOOO OOO OOO OO G 0 o 1.-4 A Cpc—i 0 \ T ^7 ; O . ° .c. m 73 �i . u,O° O N . m N 74 go,. 73 /r CJ Z m 111,:1:11J.:21------ I c- Z u1 m 2 N i cn` m "c Zo N x, v u�i Z6. C O 2 0 II �� z z c m� o "1tNi1 m mN n z z Z C v v o v v v to o s r- n -i r._..r...:. m G'i x M m qpZ 0 m m� OZ v N=n v q p�ryry D O W m p m C dl 0Cn ri c © 1d1 ° c�vi o D my z°zz _� n� CAC pCD `' � r �z 03 m o v z z m w �D ��m D Z Z m Z M CDZ D CO oT o Z CM A O V LAYOUT: WB SCH C PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlineOlyDiecovTrail\99Svice\GADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:30:22 AM V .�H�1dW �'� __ MATCHLINE STA +„,,,,, ,„”, g dls 3�,� .�r, ,?— -__ 4 00, SEE SHEET Z+6L� ..� --r.__W5 T 4t )r ff r F,.��5 F f !,{/*J 1 1 Yf ! f'' ,1 f r ,,' t r l t 3 Vf €Jf r �f i` t 1 )t T d� � f €r ' f i t,1 ➢ 1 i f 1} ' X,1 I =1 1? r t? a 1 t 1 i P I\ , 1 i t1 ,t , St i i t tf� ;t +P I €r ,r "..) ! t 3 /s Xl +� Psi li i s ' t r tP I ` 1°d) t 4 `Rt ' \ U r t1 t ; 1 \ \ € ti rF€f 5 's ,, , 3 l t � } t Y ) f F tpl < �,t r i t f 1 3 IF ) \ 11 F E tj Q 1 1 _s �..t 1' ) t P I i\ ! ,,� XI \ !. P Y LI1` X0.4 / �l*!`^^} yr t !f7� 4{I ' t / m O lj 0 tmo 't ) r t p / G m x0 ,. ,,..1 t �L 1� i I t i t 1 i iX w ! !\ ,! t. ..._ C l i It C - 4 t t 5 f P dt 4 < ! ,F a7 I i. j t ' itl ii ) f `f 1 1 r I w. , i 1i P 1 t 1 r t �..' 1r t , t I �1'' t 1 1 411 V"', 1 ( t r / , i , 3 1'i 1 E 1 Al t f I r f XXg O p [� �! S j J f / 4 i f /' i 4 1 @ Ift} `" 1 \ i FFF , r q € 1 t�! PA 1 \ti Xt t i 1 I, 1 1 € f up J f I 1 , i v 1 1 Y , t , V/� ' , ,t 1 m I •m �12Z / ; 1 A W NZ O] m � \� —� , ! I f ! '�e'. f ifft .. W Ai O at t t t � 1 s 4 1 , ! ; �✓t , e€•+ r- in. Ol k 1 '` f 1 i 4 1 S < I y M2 { ' i Xrs� X e e t' 1 ' ' .t 1 N 0' Oi ° i g ,i 1 i , ` s t ° s 1 ! fJl p r a t i x ;t! ! y� i t % t ; j N C I �� / Ii S i )I r rM l `t ,,,, d t I..n� J / j ! o f �C vvl ' i V t f r ° !s, F j� 4 o r 33 , i Pd rf ' (// $Vor _ r r ( f`�P i 4t r r : J` pr f 4 9 { ( : I 1 1 r Ili y ra } r 4 rn "( ? I D • ,...t3 4,X n j 1 { P i 1 1 4 .. ) ) O i, R 8o .I P, i t, rr f tF t i N s €' .p e' r e ,a ,t s r q / ): m A a Y i X,dlf ,,i 4i (A I • i a �v/4 AI cl /8. ? i m I PP o '3 lr 1, �i F ,a C is '�G 9 A j o j I i 7 ��rt Z tt ~" 1\ r I!i '',co ! 1 Tf� t ,I r Y r t •`> ll F 1 `1 •1 •3 !1 ➢ 5 3 t t ( 2 Z t • X� 0 �} ! I ! f,),),,, i,, t l�t€ i 1 i� 3 33 O y1� ` !~ 1, `1P , X` i i r, t o- O t! i It t! i 1 ) 1 �r t 1 3 f f43 by X 1j X04 3 — ,'k _ 4..._.. 0 V t3�t1}11 V 1 \a : N i4!j` i ` kl a Ir I y:! G ;t�f 11 1! 1 ! ,(( 1 d X ,,,...y% \A I , Y II f€ 1 }11q g of �y\ 1! 1 �� 1�1 1 j t,, ; .— : +. A , ! }4:‘,,,,,/1 n. 1 ' 1 , 13 i II,_7 I i q \ t ..._ , , I i ..J7 rQ'b Z Z °+! i io } a ar t S,,,:,.\ \,,,,0, M°4,_, t ; Ii j I ���777 t F 1 , Y `1 i q' t yL e�. fyrl ! `} . 31 ! )` it €t w 1 3 I ' Ex€t 1 III i t 1 � � ! �3 i ti4 } ,�� M m• €1P A , rt i 1 -1 `41 1 P r 1 4 t \ i F 1 1 k 44 °} r` Y II ! - ! tY t Ii t rl X4 i X° ' 1 v... ,.,..tJ t ��4ltr i , 19, y4 lw 4 N.WI x ` "��'r t t i/ a�� �` f, : } 1 gFa ' m� I € '..^ ..� t i i ' i !q p �11) m C O f P �f ,.� ��� w..... � � � kt, f x c -I O i 4 Y � 1 r � "tr s 1 � D 3 4, 3333 r 444 s r /yj -Pi i` ,)b d ,1 t 8 a d€ P 1 t F ..,1•49 , lls T1 1 I }P 1 f I i 4 'P f i r ,, t I ylt !l , , s ? C tr,.°iP fA rl J i t1 i t !1' 11 O i ^, w, t , } €`r' r rr r s s ) } 1 C. '.I/y m �_/fi" _ .I 3 €€'FI!J € + ' ,._.,. . I I t n4 O ti =r �'" I tT rn xi -o � � �'. 1�,. .a4�� _ H.7 s `- j' :: D rTP S co Z C) � I �- z, r jt,tr, a I °/ l € i co W �•�- (i° \!! 4 pp II oTri '� co w �1 40.23''I j�' 'A`, 4 .r : r-1— 1 g: ,,,, '�. !1\ -I t / J£j f i / A''^., A f Pi 9 4 9 3 i i p r r 1F� �. t ! 3 ` 3 t 1 'fi , I ) lr f s ! e 1 ,� II t ® i ! 1P '-tq�, j 1 ;t, tf ) i I 1: 0 / �f_ _L _: 1.•■ _ ■ `... . rte '`' './ . r,,..., �. rtr /.:1",',+, j", ill �\ •!1 I- 1 : ; : MATCHLINE STA 479+25, SEE BELOW ,17 , P //;, rf�� i i i t V .F 3 }t 1�I ,!r I . ,,,,,c/ v Is t/ rt t' 1 $ i 1 f _`! 1 i f t� f X ' 1 , , M o q �� t, f J f , I * N TCHC� s-- ���1 m ..w OG0000000 0�0 0�� 0� 0 0 D I2S �E`•f..,/,/l r tt! a, mmJ CO CO CCO M Q1 CO r-co o N Z T T fv N 01 C a, CIS■ N m F---.......____________-- U� �� ey m Z f{ m XD S ny fns m Z Ni z,'„ t2/1 Y "0 N O A a C7 Z v + _ 'r/ Z m CO 0 o p /f r m n -t Z Z < A m m c°n C7 03 I,Z ZO Z C to T u u I o m o m o zo o N o ° -mni 3 ` "�' c� rl lc���' Ti 1"' „ ; �' to m D o i� Z 4 D v _ o� n m G�i f ; m m r= Z F �� o �� Z Z C7O � � ullrJ .k a 1� r�' (�c G' NOrO I� m Nm m o_I o © c.a 1 ; oz Z ti rn z y oZ N m CO m m c r I.Cl _ to r z CO D Z ^� n r m m mA rm y '�., m z v Z o m CO Z �� w c Z m o 0 z 0 Z r 1 a k.,V O co •••••■••............,..........._..___._._____._____________ LAYOUT: W7 SCH C PATH: U:\Brom\Prajects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrIlne01yt 1iecovTrail\99Svca\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE Thursday.July 12.2012 7:30:32 AM V rA� g 3N old r•, —'�"� S 33 �, 133H —.I, \ \ �� � i t 1 /\ I \ \ t 1 1\ /� \'', v"r\ `, I _ if ! \', OI l °N2 i t t! S Q t 1!/ l I '/\ / D !t i di� °K .ate � /, v\ G iJ' 1 O .,...,\ ic°' i4 i - ' d t F 9 S A [�J /�C ft y§ 'I� i ° !" °J8.4�.G I C)V fI y J+ !! q m c to + t ■ ! t ! 0 Ai Z °m o m \I '; ! !! II i t!t, ; �� CA � a, .� �hr i t , F J n �� t t ,t t _._ a + _• f` 9 ° /J I JJ ! e i ' i I� E 5� tt fJ I ! 4 ! t i t ri ,9!01 I e / ® \ J 'O y E�� I ' �F s,.J siT1i ) 1 b Nt i t�lJ�xi ,r +1 Jr °�i( I i 1 /\it r C or --' W !t C Q J ri F 1 (0 t + -r+ , ^` �. _ \ i it lk 'a = ,; (� f °I v 1 fit€ I ,+' �! x�', ir'°�� f F - J `J J p! rJJ++ t t 3 V i r JJ /JJ' F , , J i a �, O � ''�, s�t J y r !. i f t l ! l A ' ( J € E d\ J €! ,ryl CO E 1 I J 1 3 I f r ' \ 'I1 r+. \\t0 + ' c E i I E _ \,qM ti tt 4 I j \� *� f �\ f Ei it 1 9' !!t i V tP qqh\Fg4h\ n i 11` I ! { t 4 tiE i+ IJ A: t i �~ egg4 A Q t! t ! S4 1 i� J t '. t i Y y} ` i KK t !i ! 1 i i 1FL q , \. a _ + + 1 tt t it 1111 ti i i I y t Y ~~�\v \a - Y \v\ I j iJ if Jt vql qx S 1 4 I I i i$l 1 1 q \I 3 t i f t i I I,„„ I e \ l LAYOUT: W8 DETAILS PATH U:Warn\Projects\Clients\8954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrllne01y0iacovTrcll\99Svca\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE: Thursday.July 12,2012 7:30:53 AM V x�� 0 E g -0- n ° w N a r N OC 0 D I D (/) �W AA rm �m I- F \ / m1 w o- n Z��� _ _ I'L��� m De O rz zr*I 'I Z x • -10 Or-.0 Z 'I��I N n C m l7N e'a °Or C loz Z1 I 'I !N w x 9 m�� \ r Slate ___ 03 ne m O— av(.k % f0� Oarn __ 7C? 40 fn�Z o •'o fit'• ; vCmj. s n n I cl el o o° L a m ICI. ill _ -�_ I . ° C. ���,� m y rrI ` .lel. < oz O m m �`.II. II 0 Ag t C z z o 17" 3" MIN m F 0 °w' w ro 0•141 5p�_ �. z xtn -or - 0 U cn z / o m en m 0 ANNA n E m ' . - � ;, s m II 1 m I-m No >o N x CO > 6.,�:sa...s„.... ' v _ D <° C Ul -a I I X I� <c� mz o D ��_ S m _' m �m tnv r� 'rom�zm p DC m DTI °� Dfxrl 1 ill 1 CA C Z-< -" c m as m O �� -D= D O 4 A � m � N O m o =D 0r im & a ti > v = I-9 Co z� 0 �ZA (n') m a N Or 0 w OD II��11�z r11 rn D v m m 2 -°n N 0 -0 AFD 0e°m 17 D r 00 �\ 0 x m0O O v. < %\\I �oa -Dim An �' C7m OOC) �I I n /\ N o m -17 ND °zn cn °c�i v o ;\\ 0-<< oZ s m� o Vi z-c7irc�1 Z lig mzx Tn o °� r y o c�73 73 y �� zc�F; ^r1 00 m -r- .> �ji�-r------ r�' rzil m 73 x z I Z1 O -- T I4'el4 * Aiir..7.0.)1401•411 7 z�z m o v y ,e�i m . e 'D O Ii�i 'Ir z y limi __ _, ,. 1 xo rnc7 ra =F F� M ii't'■ i -i) dry x r- :;:::Arialm... ..... ... ..... .) tim o�rl O�°m mn C BOO mmn yO , to NO,D°D w2 o tn�il 1 � D D�tn �Z °y c- Z °� w -' a n O�/ N 3gM t7 O0Z 30 "0 �� 3L) �� t!1r °: F':- 6f "T �cn c) z �D.� �� za zx z„,, n D � / 57 m n x z \ om R'4'. m (PA c o� 1�vz n urni> w0 Omo -o y o m n c°a m < c° A zxv r m I*I o m 73m 0 =A r 0 rr m ft �T Df c a 3° DE o m1z a Co Ours D°Dm Mw zm x o Ay z z<C manl mTOm " m FD �mm DS�i °w m m Om x,-O XI-nz \\' °z m m OcDi Y 1 z I OPrl rrr-2 ,: , � m° o > z m v F< y / wv w -.I m m =I_1 1 1 0- Z '^ .,i Dmc O-zl z pO ' °' c$ii uFi°rn� na w oz v v � , S _. DZ r z ° °M�03 LI)77 N% o ° ° 0 r� zmz 6" 6" f m0y So c V -n�1I ti�n1 �0 o m m 4v r91 -o ' cmo nr W �° ° it-% ��� z to o m c 0 ..co, - c cn C- CA P 12 o -n/ :fr f / to °-m m 4 � m y n i ��\► � m p m/ v �z °mt° ��_-'ir � i �� oF ��o ono cWI* !} � �� t '" � , . �D O -1 ) -1 O a z °D-i P m - m L..\, `"i o;\t . s " ;�j N 0 r nmm//A to > 0 m z o o z -0 m m 1 �1 co v$Z vow cz° O DO oO cm O Z DOS e C Q O C Z o ; ZN :,,,t O-7 m--I< m (n ZIP mnG O = T _ Z n Rl n r J z N v O . m ZOm °�F o�F n v�f im Z mn Ill ( Z S 2 m m m m m cO�F ° RE--1°Z11� 9 8 ,3 cn z ZmI g a D --Inc= uuu ° no z fo tzv N CO-i -i 11M o am M 1 o m x Fo o m<mv S AG r o0 \ `^7 - z to 7 ro� z o o < * m c f r � --I m . � 4 Z o o tn-i' m Z m %_ oZvb CO tom n c Co z M�Aa o O (1) 7,.,5' i =o= =oi -TZCmlf O z9,200 03 c� 3 3m mZ z --' D m mpg 0=DV� � Z = \r 4`D �on Z cn n r OO Z° o o ° N .Og_, s ,-- Co m cm Ph- mmzc) m w G O CO rn >r o 15 z mHm mmm D w;118 >8 zm M 0 ° rr 2 LAYOUT: S1 PATH: U:\Brom\Project"\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtr96. isoovTral\99Svoe\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE Tlwrsdoy.July 12,2012 7:44:36 AY V cn O o ' O 61 O ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I R N I / I z / 1 14'-0" \ I - 8M / 1V-0" \ ^1 0 / WALKWAY \ Till I / z I �_A __o i.PEDESTRIAN I P BRIDGE _., , I, r II ? I I / II ' 1 .---- 1 _1 1--L -- — ,: Ii - --4----- :- m I 1 I -I z �- - ! z �, - D m m oo L� j C L - D ;l:I X � _ I GO�7 I f C = O 1 m 8= I g g I j.'. P. 1 y r'T 0 XI N ' N „ * I $ I I � . r j cs `m ' O i' I —1 W /, ua m jl o o - /, I C J� m (O o < m 9O }�I o-I 7 41, Z 4 0 I ; Z i n 0 I V 0 �m 0 1 y x o I m y I - x y I 3 - 1 tier \ _II ___ ___."-: $ I I I j%- I I; i _ I 03 I r 17 CO I I z al 'I- r---__- o-I I A in m \ :' Z p = Z / O N N 0 o m (m ill 3y n < n p 141 �s o n o /Z I Z C i t n z -C !AD W V OP.' ;$' W N 0 r -4 in z 11 m v0° 'fix l°l++°10 o- 2 z cm mm i v i 0-n'-- m r rn NO mi go-C-o 0 m -or m mm- z r �V iH� Az mGv om D1Ni1 Nm �- c� T mn I 11 Tr n,0 0 .-, yDD mO �x mcy _, axc n*0 z :-'° og °^yy'AIr' o V; CZ) i oos oND-D 0 AO� 2 ZO z,'Dn zO mA cr 0 -0 mrz Z-1r I7• 5 4'-0" z tox, 0-0 mZ =* mm rM m�m OY cn 0 Nv f+Z'I O� [r*IX mm NO t7 m Z pr m .ZOI W y N C O x m i, D1> Op ZS O 01= O m- m- 0 mom Z r -I -I v1 m o i _ , z z Z cn C i mm m ^ II 0 el we r Opn Z^;O2 N ON N o �J en 2 -18 v i m y D F rn m -� n z m 1! w I s_ = 5 m-' • n m r' co mom- -II r C O = 0 1 0 —�-'\ V/2. — 1 -&) _R �3 -DI= m mv� m v' m mc��n Dm Z —I 0 r' Ar 0 ? m oOO o �m m �° v"'i pzzI Nz .Um 117 $ `"* 4 -� , °� CO„,_ Zg gZ ° o o �� �� y o -I n � Z C) 0 J ==yN ° Z ��` _� -I F cj° 9mxi o o �xm a o -, m I ' J n� -Z ti O Z 0 0 D F 0 m D D m m rn C N n z r -I Z Z x y >� z �0o x mm m m 0o Pm z > Z m W ' Om N .0.P r m ■ LAYOUT: S2 PATH: U:\Breen\Projects\ClIonts\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtrlinaOlyDiscovTroil\99Svca\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY:pstarjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:4&37 AM V 9 N 14'-0" 7.-0" 7'-0" - z 2 Z P f. r 1----'''''''') 1-•-----j M I 1 1-6—_- °* C° A Z I Q j W > L I _I L_.1_1 I CO_I S' z . . w z i c��wZ L7 = pm -< T9 ya. . 5 N i i m, 1 , - I N s� S 8r� - — AI- O_a =D Qr {A 8'-6" 8'-6" 17'x0" - I 0 l'F' C 73m 1- o 0 Z I' 1 z V %Q i I a pp X' 17'{-0" ;I - 8'-6" 8'-6" - II II OP §Is -§ Y.N Z `_ 0-1 _ I .'0 m i T o =� r a �m to ` �II — — — — — J — — — — — — ro m 3D 1 xi .oz co 0 ? E y czi O a c CO 0 z z0 I z 0 >3a N z r-< 1 2 r v c) Z )4: 0 'Tl p i C.:_ :- , -`_ 7'-0" 7'-0" - zz oo n �._ _ � 0 y m = i 14.-0" v -i 0 171 ( f- � Z C/) z C ,yam I I i Z ^, mac _ T OQ Cn N O9 V G LAYOUT: S3 PATH: U:\Brern\Projects\Clionts\6954-NOSC V36-6954-001 WtrlinsOlyDiscovTraU\99Svcs\CADDVIWG\ PLOTTED BY: peter:MI DATE: Thursday,JWy 12.2012 7:50:15 AM V TO g 2'-0" , . F: 2'-0" BRG A "' 9"9 1 -3 I:Pc •- -, i 2 2 R I PI D SO id < m El o > c RI 23 I ' + • , z > 0. < 1 ---1— 9, -...! i -13 C's CI ,E 2 qg 71 rn c"..t.1.2.gm r- cbc,uI ri i "o -< 1 4.,,,0 rTa L-"'----..........4 0 F.' 8 ;I 73 t4 V I.4 -.' M + ---. r- 1,..1 s .. r --• ',... ..." 8 • _. . -a -. _. _. o r 4". u C m 4: 0 r 0 fr. 3 _________.____..._____ ro 1 . xi 1 H rF) 6° -.... ■I 2 i; 1 0 xl I 03 . °a rdn . C 0 E E c R1 Inl I I CI CI 1 —4— , ■ rg II V 3 3) i ill) l• 3 !..1 0 ■• 1 X 1 ia A A 1. I§2 • '.*)1 !II q --. .g3 * ti Z> _, 0—i 73 M I -1 m rn 0 x r 6 0 OZ o r,m A i 23 1p -< ••••0 W 00 ...e> m r .- 7,..< 2'-0" * r... > Z= 0 0 M Z b• z o 0< -1 Om IP 2 0 o z c< tr) 4•4 • , • C-0 • • 2§ e XI x -"I> >r- r , • ,, . c)--t Pi • • . -ill • ifi= . . .1-1111 . " .i 1=-M=1 I 1:1 4 FEL1=jilE 4 diqiHil„ z : " • ' ^ . .. . A .. •H - ...--.,-3 1.. • C°.• • rF") 17 n-1 ei U) J 'UHF. 1 . . . ... „ . . • . . --- . m o 1 .=":----,^•• -. .... • 4- 14k ' •7-1 1 . . .• , , . . ` ' • . 2" ..% . . e '1:----111-7---111:----I'!•,;, iffl 4 . I . • -111 III .itl:,: g i • . ' t 1 114': .. ...0 I's'.. G.71:: Ca 4 :...7.) 0 . .. z „ Iffil - XI z r -_—) - 7'-6" u) m X rn 0'4 c) CA o`21 -4 LAYOUT: 54 PATH: U:\Bran.\Projects\Chants\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrltn•040iscovTroil\995vcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY:prdrjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:49:36 AM V i0 16 SO FaN _ 2'-0" _ 'A r 2'-0" BRG 9" 1'-3" 10 r I I o WP2 I C_Z p Ili 0 G C6 I .0 G, D l ► 1 D j i v ( J I .10 > VCS r= y'y�� 2 r eg f.-.@ jpp+'^yZ m NO 1 O t2 70 N y i `R iI a 1- r \ g " $C M0 �° 7$ °O r D II D a oD 1 O Z o Z AP XI 1 H tea o 0 r4.PI 00 a m o 0 ir I 1 1 I I i I ti y 3 ID �r till 141 gf> X122 5g> v A za 2 XI m > o r m in p I-m m 32 <- 0 • O ▪ y..< 2•-0" r a 3y 2 n0 �v n 0 z- D.XI V G-)"1 •.. N 1•• Cv 2 g 6. D> • r . m- 1 I I I I El • 1-I I_I 11-III—II p •0 1 JJ1 I I I- • • III=r ,III„ TI01 N 1I y c co 0 � mN a N O zi in. J • I _L_��!IIi I ,0 cl y p 111=_-III— DI m z ) 1 • 7.-iii-i-_---111E_--1:4:::111 I I11 �.' $ D n (� IIII1111111`' " i- , C Di Ty k ----C----iC:' O O co.-) , 3,-4. 6-10" mm U 1J t>1)--, Cn O 9 J T A O V ■ LAYOUT: 55 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrltn.O,y0iscovTrall\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED 8Y:peterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:53:56 AM V A 0 F,N ° < - 3'-6" 11)x" 10" V3 A ° a c° z33 = D D 0 —I m I m V=F ZZ0 m 0 73 N p"�rr j r CO LA Pa"I , N s 4 rn 0 O = 0� 9 a * II °� s Za °. D .em r r N N N y 3 A i 77 N LA II a e Fr r II I , II I z L V 1 y lii . 3 ID �r Nil 8y? a 182t 1C ��m 00> ra C A C O Z a y TI A p rm m 3Z < _0 w y n0 rn n j n n a 3 v fri_ i Z O= 0 n z 0 z r-< -I-I 1 ) Z P r v z � -9 c / —m �I�Ca N p Q � P�X rn = l I o z m , I c I I r —I n 1 1 il ,�. o`� Z i 55, , oe ffl A© ICI xi m N O D, CD O� C.1 " A O V LAYOUT: S6 PATH: U:\Orem\Projects\giants\6954-NOSC\236-5954-001 Wtr 11ne01bO1scovTroll\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: peterjul DATE Thursday,July 12.2012 7:53:17 AM V 2 19 Z N O A A b g > L 0 0< cO' z it I ra I 1. -- --------_.r__-- -, 1A------------- i LL- L_ co co 7 I C) G0 w v y m In o Zv rQ A W CNz`O z O@ mP iviZ N m gZ r r �� r m u r I.) g U >1 4 m = . rr S O u a * '° u nz I 01D, i 0 .1 g. G 0 Z w o <m r v F A 1 CO C' N Pa 7p 1 1 3'-6" 11)i"� 10" _ 4'- " .- 3/114" 1 01 y . 3 fp k. PP ON F S-25 � g> FS 9 A ZD _ n 73m > 0 2r m p rrm A 3z -< -p r+ Vl °0 A m a. 11' D r o 18,, e z = z0 - n< z D-( 0 1 a 0 z r a Z � o „ M 0o n y _ N XI c� zm � i_Li h9i r J ° � 5 s.?n vr/ D Z C ocn � � § z , Z o Q I�I m fJ U ll P D. CO tJ�ll W a A m A V ■ LAYOUT: S13 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\plants\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrlin sOlyDiscovTroA\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: psterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:55:06 AN ■ V o� 2 H W # 0 O N O O O I/::::''I1111I111111II I IIII 11111111 OD - nZ 1 D N ..> 6n 1� M = ¶ m 1- -* ' II / -- � 0 c a c° I / I ill i RI z { —Z_ -_ ' : I --- —: +' I� m -+- m -' f r ..--- _ I,,I' EV 9- I ' p D alC�l�Z J // - II' nz 0 / I c) m - I �,0 l/1 I - - D 1 � ..-."' li kA - or I ill 0 f°Tl / r It 'I'v�11 'b ,_ �11, ��� ∎I� �I l�ip / IiI�I, I I," ul d. Co ni l� P3 i D y W it 1 G.) Po Z I ! o' m 1- 0* 1 ^Z° •. _ O I ,11;11 1!' m m I u _ c - a _ I I$III:''. °e 7C O °' 7mCF'- II � rii��'' z 4D Z 111 II I _0 I ,........ '/ �II I'I 1 y I =-I /= �i1 l I - �'Is II t II IP dl 3 / u„ ,/,/ /,1:::: ,/,',1',/,',///I A--- -_,,,„-----/, :::---:', \ 0 LO g. ,/ / / 1 -„,/ ----___----_____—____-_-_;;;r--C-::)' -7/ iX \ I oz- ,' / / 1 ; / ---- ____;__,;"' ( I _II__. _ =Ill .— �y I -71/1—- Vii,= I� \ �y -�\� _ czi 111 II -o it ZY , ^' 1 — — ! N ° =r II-.Ip \I r- oo m Inl r, 3y °m C)CO \ l m 2 - z K { I O to r- `; X I , T Z 2J ,. tom , , 1 , 1 0 n< -, 1 O m (//�\� z r-c 1 -, Ti 1\ J) V P (JI 1+ W N 3-1 I,.- 7 V(l G) (0 m zF, 1 v J1J ntr+,mtnil (o�-Di �Z tom vx1 0°� m 1:::, �-� "u n czi o= D-I m rm mm �Z m mw z r r� x=v� om T. 1C) ° n m 1 =Ia r ; =".1 ,:._7 xx 1N NO T^o I-TILT. mn 1 11-Tis n*A z t�v gcx �� o �� czi z Zoc�i otn O o rA� zgy 1-`a n�' ��C � nmm ��1m N<Z = Ju 3'-6" °mrnmm t` 9, "'m 2 ZIP o°x ° O D \'--_JJ �z��� yio z= "'° a'x o =oo mom Zr ►-.-i---•..----__ D X 0 N .,z rI z m o A °m Z 0 0 YI O C N + fr,rn0n zN 0= N Oy (n ZG)0 N� m N n i;S:4 y 9^ -C°7c 1 D =m m 2 = O z Z -0 t/1 Z C7 Z 171 u wo-I o� my D I- �lvmo -x Q O = 0 I p v ,°,�= m li o 0 U j I D o o �xm �v ♦mom m °j ZN= Z zm xi m No- 6z m(A � ,, z.=-, m S SA n C ° )A °vZ m ) � m�Z° _�0 . 1m z m o x zx z m -,1 m a' a m � r -I "' ° CO v Ct -I m ,z P no g om c N r z z- x -I o 75 _N A m O -7,m W 0 --1 CO o m O D m O x m o Z rn 0Ti z Zl W P C j Tz N W V o m I LAYOUT: S14 PAN: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954—NO5C\236-6954-001 WtrlinsOlyOlscovTrail\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED 6Y: petsrJul DATE: Thursday.July 12,2012 7:55:42 AM V A 5 o_N 2 N 6'—O" 3'-0" 3'-0" 2 A Dr 9 2 % m 9 D N_ o x Dye 9-g G °rD C° Al A n j 1 y (A L _I cc r -1 — .t—_1--- ---I--L- -- -- 1 1 co L_..1— 1 J E y Scv�'aZ (I 0 C = t• 6(N�Z D O @ I l) tIID; Z t0 N 0 pm 0= O N N T4 Z or 6 or 8'+0" 0 C Z -- 0 O o z co -o A v Z Si ti) 840" 4'—O" 4'-0" 3 1 F 51 3 ,. rt O 1_ J CO ti 9 W IH Z pym —I I N ro * g Zy ; O 2 r 1n 3 Z zi .0 m °0 0 r r — 3'-0" 3'-0" r ci p 6'-0" -- z 00 z rx-C O z_ r a z o „ (41: 1 i g vzv � m 2 L � C✓_: � �� �Dz cn � m n r -o Xm° o z Vim < l l oc ° _.2 j 1.3 z A � 'c.:..5 fC Iz I c _. _„ ii CO V F -mi J o LAYOUT: S15 PATH: U.\Brom\Projects\Clients\6954—NOSC\276-6954-001 WtAine0110iscovTrail\99Svas\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BE peterjul DATE: Thursday.July 12,2012 7:56:19 AM V mA o� 2 N >° A a1 < $y 2>im2 2'-0" _ 6 °a E2 BRG 33 2'-0" > 9" r-3" 13zo 0 2 §2Vi +&I wzmz 0 ,. 1 < o'P Lai�Z m r I W I ` � o 0x m I I N O I O N o N it N m O n° , O1 at pCF D D _—_ _—_—_—_—_ _—_—_ _— ___ 10 D r _--_—_— .—L_—_—_—_—_—_ re 1 Ofo -4 Z Co e D 07 O _> I OG) A I Z + A GI m °e Z G L,+m o t,,c°, A I I m o 0 1 1 B 1 a y y 3 Lit 0 �r iiii aoti A.Z m g> v a ZD n 73T z o =r En- o rm D m• 3z pp 0 • y0 < r 2'-0" -1 > 3y -0 x ca Zc� O O 0< m o >xi C7 2l m 0 o • 111 L=1 .1—III I • � � IIIIIIII _I 11, 1 I I—II I • .o � n 13 --ii t.::rtA.,______ 0.) M I —1.— CD h j COz, ,_,.., II_I II-111_1_,,,_,„ „....,... p FE -11-111-11 111-1 i-11:;m --I cr) ----Arf , $ 1117--111-11..t . k � N f k ° o z .) 1 0 3'-2. o t``' r� vN z 1/111.1 7'-0" m x —i o C �R —1, O-C w ao V LAYOUT: 516 PATH: U:\Brem\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 WtraneOlyOiscovTro9\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE: Thursday,July 12,2012 7:56:45 AM V' A 2 oN_ Z N co v 2 o 0 3F ?iP 2.-0" _ 6 o< c8 BRG 2.-0" e >> 9" 1'-3" Z O L7 y mg Z= &A wzgz O @_ m m ` Oe OA \ e N ! O (> 1 N a m or at N Ti - 01 O r O Tn a O p .7(f^ s Z c W L'..1 m m to o X + I ti iy g3 1 ".1).■F . y9 p$ a 3 >i Xr CC A F Z> _, 73m Z o• r• m m 3Z • -o m D O r� 2'-0" 0 Toil Z y v x• Zn 0 o• as 0 z r< 0 _1-1 • m•O °m Z r .e X e III • ° • IIIII 1-11111 o Z ,y W II I II 1 111 I,, TO o � ; yam —I u riTI ao —- 1 -re 6, I co e A \ �. ° r L t Z e� 0 t. 1 N o Z M __✓ z • . >' 11=1 1 I I I �'=ham 1=1 III °'`, �; ° z>1 c p i�� -I-- III I1 I? D n r • '!bill L X) M m -1 l 11 l II I I I I`., •�„�4. ca C? 1 a +acv O-4y glt 6'-6" mT l Ind IJ O CO O CD su O -4 LAYOUT: 517 PATH: U:\Bram\Projects\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrline01y0is ovTroU\995vcs\CARD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY peterjul DATE Thursday,July 12,2012 7:57:47 AM V !2 N O 4'-31a" 4 m 3'-6" " 10" y P mg I o D r D 410 Va Z xi Wzsz 00 Co <ap Am IZ rn 0 x r 1D CA r N A g sa a m- o w 1 N " 41 m S S S t0c CO � O 0r 11 D * II Z z aD ' 0 y 1 Z * <•" zF F N W N CO 3 ; ----i. A I N W 1' e r, - rte—-—-—-—- -—- if I i 1 0 i WI 12!A Ig� _1 A 9 C c 1 Z D y Zm Z o Ir o rm A 3- Z as m a< 1!e --I • r >n 3 y o Z = Zn O n< z r< 11 o I J Z r 0 G zD W®� o r- --1 o - a IT r D a � m 0p 1 m 1 (74 III m F LA 0 4+ o T m N O9 V LAYOUT: S16 PATH: U:\Brsm\Projsots\Clients\6954-NOSC\236-6954-001 Wtrlins0110iscovTrai\99Svcs\CADD\DWG\ PLOTTED BY: petsrjul DATE: Thursday.July 12.2012 7:57:20 AM V A 5 O� 2 H O D A < It A 9 S ° O 3F ?2 P2 A B i• i c° P 33 z i ■ Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES\2011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:G1_TITLE SHEET Plot date:Apr 13,2012-04:15:43pm CAD User:swinter. �- _ _ w < v '� GmJ v r ° D D W N z = x D W (/1 c RI " m 2 -I(9 �n m x x Z cci O /� 2 �O uzin mo *.... < Z IT�I : m TI m m m v O D m m D = O� ? X O Z X X r D m 'D _.0 -I fmTt D p E 11*jg�� t z z � D m AO 1E._.‘.. v z_ z �� T c � z m -I O .Z07 m ® O K ,0 co m D m -a D 111r- IL. 0 la Cn r_ _ K o Z S '�''' I. - Om r el 4 z c-0+ o el Ia m 00 o my D tn z --i c G1 z G O W N 0 IT D -m C n m o� mo y ° v Z O M f� m Z °N H z > nm o Z7 0 = _ o --I (n W 1`) Z O Eli o m Z Z F D ° N C v K z m z /J Jf�aii aM1jt 7 �' Hr ��, r O Pi o � i�r>4g�,111r `�. l C` V 't fir J b �'t s �ti6 F "'6 I�J�] �' "��..,ill ii ES ��„p,, 'Y ��' ,.,-__' b i q w- ii,N, jh. - co zj 11\\ ({ l7 O D 4 ,, ` t ,of?i+, Q� 1�#1'..:-:;41,0,-,-il 5 {��� ..��1'�1 1��i} !:' O igol .,<, A n fi nr `lS.° r „Q.,�' `i �f ;? r ilia `� o //�J �1�4�4i +gy �/_, R _ 9 cDi z i �j,� ),sir ° r -; _ , ��1 p G 9 o N Z ! "))P,"4 f..1,,,-,,,-yI,��e 9 1 ,” \11)y Gr < m I v m m � � \ )`� rV� � �. a ��1�' =F$�t7`rr� Ir6l �ar�fjfr,,r°�r u\ r „1 �T/Pp c a /J s f - I( 9 fr74, (^)'41r4t,,,,--, .. ,„n-i, -.424/-IV o v== v o OZ *� ....._.a"",�.,q Y*.q r j .,,,,.s ittio, , .�rP.�a r \ L LU nvi p o ilii: 3` �lM1 } o r�z° cn ^, ;'' .�D r.1, " f ,,,: ,�.r 1, l j• �r�P �,.\ ��PfJfq� L-130 �� i zz z N z z 0 r ._=a s; air t if `' m +�r "� a z and ,°�°z z 1, � .1 �'"1y?ry,.1 „,,,,,,--'1:' :'�. ., -- �.,, ,Is, rn �.rw3 4,..,:,,I J r Y � �'A: y;;,y�sJJ((JJt\` ^'t )(p .0 r'f , T J � ki � �^,Y `; A rY Lii T r r ;-; it `, 1\ ` 'rn 0„,:4oifffiri,o*,v477_:74;,42k:-zii;g.'il'i,.:3F,.,'N"''L'\,.;P,., :*-- -----i--;,---g-,---..:.....-- n -4,s,:',;:,4,-,:i,.[?.?,,illh.-,ii7irf.4:47,24,1r„,,,,„ill.”,;:,,,-,.- --1,-•:-t..4-t74 ,,,,..4„.,,_... ,„ „.......„ -,--.,„ -._.,..1-.r.,,,,,- .01rolgjk o c) \\I ) rn 73 o 0 Y I py„ _ v.. r t5�M1>:?7.,�� � V r,....3 'r ( II Z *.;47'ifs4;•.n.I1 � ' 7,„` � fl"..4 0 C75 = X X v O m X l�n Z Ri G7 G1 O 0 Z Z Z Z Z z o Z 0 - (P G7 G7 i 7 _.._. .. D D D N D C)N Z C7 N N N N O O W (++ IV J 7 (� O O b, W "z 0 13 J (a N _ m m z o 0 o O m ' A r 8 c O m "a O rn r srAT� --1 o c Tl - ni q m m C 0 C "r • till 0 R. let C Z] D n = _ D c �m' Z O V7 o m I Noe, O On T W N D C z z <Z r c n:m c) m zD -o a vDO ` Z 0T) c z zo "I D v N _ ›, Vi m 7 A Z Z c O D m ; O' z o o r1 2 o v z O 73 3. Lc 1 O c IN i s W z O Z P L___Z ;0 a _ _�l x n Fl • ,O m r G`Z `• � E -o —.4 z 0 1 c) D "cn N m Z m m v y m L. O R.?m G i-I z Z m D m m `z r i r Z m Z --1 z o z o N ■ Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects1211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90�ercent\D Filename:C1.0-OVERVIEW Plot date:Apr 13,2012-01:48:45pm CA.D User.swinter. , , , ..: L yl.111 V A s, . .....* ;. M s ya o� cn r ,H. O A ' `sue H m xi T ! Vs l4.F . : y D .. e iR 2 Y .t . �K/Sq M Jg' �0N OR�K or r 'Y „., D° CH4ryNfC g El 2 y K r. -1-3,; b' 2 2' ' . al .:. -\,,,,,,,, N • ,-''30-.4itt:. - .. r °° �>>i►. Z� o 0 o s, z IC 0 73 o 00 0 CI)v 2O 73 o° o� t C nC �- CD C1 '� �c m C3 mc DZ h- 1 - Z N rl4 '' S Noy 0 K Z CO � > O N A W N �''I�)'q fo o - N A W N ���J/77 D o °o o DO Om on x O 1G.J 'omn -iO Dc> T�t7 ��--1n cnm D�� mvv r02 <mD oNO-i z c_ 0 w z O� wg3 z Oz0 00 :UO viDO m�20 �� :i1pm Z7.173 DO Omr. O°�v X7 T Z .2-oz DDZ mz 2 Z rmz my G)00 mr D � �o m -11 A� �1 z< iz- 2-1 D1 mm� ODm�1 �< wr ° zmm TN c nm �m<�G07 M O) m O r� z� o0 1 m 2�� <� lDn� Nzc °cDiC7 0 �zo P�� SZ icy D o� .Z7 2 o m O z oZ o Z z 1 m.. 02 2020 oz m m D zO 0pr (1) O �7 N or m X m0 0- 0 A 0 oTo m0 w.-1 o Nm_ ).mo OZ m,� ,0 mr zo mzmm r O m rn N Z D= =...<° w O 00-a D� z-1 z0z m��-1 fOi� pmD Sz �D oz mzmg Z r p-I a+ o w '^ Or zm , , z c�� OO mO CmO �WT1�zC �� mm� rA =c OA OZOO'DO z 0 �� Og r O �0p zm cam o�0 m o w N g0<v Z < �_ o m ZOG)m ZD ',-,:g°2 zo zD �m =-Inz O m - m O O-z1 zlo m m z moll� 3� �� zm= O�IAI'irt1D D-mI �mm O �-i 0.m vONO Fri Z X w w w N AD <C m v 0 vD3 O� �_ -IZD vDD-cl m-C 2�0 cum= Zm V A C zm,m C Ill CO w N z ITI mZ 20 o 00 c <r ND cOr r-^*0 7JV mzm -O Z- Om G70NC --1 m 0 0 a o o 2 00 Oz O O m D - m�0 -mi'-1-0 -ozw p m Z �om �0 1-0 O-i mrz o v o z m>21-- rn a o -� Dc z(7 m mm • r zm �• o mAr > 0yrn -.1� AZ -in -i'o O —I ITl N b, <n D n m n m c • m m X � m� c -i m _ ' tr - O m °w v 0 m 0 _..7. -- 0 -1 II O r O O N Z O r N o o � 1�A rAi1 m n �Z•-^ mDn zx o0 z�°._� f--i. -' .._ D O 2 m D m D y'0 O D -C 3 c m 2mmz�z �° mm o rmDO∎ Syr 21 D OD o;�70A O�y Z Z=jD So �A SD DODO (cr�m m r m vi Dm mm zOZ .� m0� O O <nw AOn' !�+? O �Y cs2�,�v� On ;� O D O o m tI'on c'? D m O"'1 1^' m � O v = OZ np� �m°m DD 0 z0 zomm �L v �m vA=1 �n0 °m AO C mD 0rmv m"`o z Ot�z czimF Om mo �p0v` = O N D Dz o 0 n Z O p m Z m 3 2 1 2 .., rAn o° `� m 3 m N m AS Dom -0100 •0 DD "<0 w W-Oi 1:i. ›- 1. - ° ' mm m zvY ., DD Z n A Z f-1 v C0 AZD 0-1 -I< <'' D_ DOD N 3 0 2m A RI, _ i, . •v m .5 D2 Z mx .Zx100 NW0 X N> mm 0 f0° rm nnVl N s z mz _.? :'a.1 �'�!7 m z nA m z� DAy m"'m D az .z27m w O'of7 00 u�Stl O O _ mO Po O-omi r r Am �. �`. 0 < =o O T btua' A = m A x z o O Z 0 m m mm - 01 z O ni p 1n r — A x D m Z 0 m Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling1CAD190_percent\D Filename:C2.xplans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:15pm CAD User:swinter. II 'I 1 '�\/i \\ 1 l L tall ELEVATION ( ( /I / \ / • 1T 0 I l .1 O N ) I Igo"/' 0 n ! I l i 1 I i i N A W N p A I I I / \ 0 I / I I/\./� I I 1 • ' I I O / I �� I / I m N I v/// - -- --� I o D o - W N N W j I I 1 \ \ ` 1 / m 1 / l A I o o j A z N P Ol O \ I ! /' I 9. A O _ /) /l + I O m )/ I I / ) o (I I 1 o 1• n 1 •(1 \ i < r m -0 I I /n / \ I \) 1 U I W W W W W W 21 11 N O N Z I I 1 1 V b I, • C) , _, 77---r .; \ . , '2, !! _ , m m N N ^ �_ — I I i J, , , ii /0 I / m 1 .�ci Zoo 1 \ ( / ( A -/� 1 2 I I I \ < Q., I ' ^ _ ' I I I ( D m D p= II 1 ,W o N \N 'ti\' D o� Cb - < r- , / ` I ) / / I I I \ ( N •o O O M 1 'I - / / H�� \ 1 IAN O I \ •• II ) 1 ) )"t o / 1 I 1 \ .__`� 1 0 I I m ,_-_ 1 / /1 A I il• - ,I Il / 7/ CO ( 1 Z li \ I 'I I \ \ I \ / ! z I \ „i I p 1 I is I I 'ryl (II / I 1 �/> ( I / _< 1 , I D / / \ = / / / /' ` o o 9 II m °I EZ I 1 am � K gyp. \ 1 ; y� I 1 \ 1 u _ o. o o---i- -I-I----- / % I /,//\\ // / o n�z t 1 N. / I I ' % O I 1I1 /\// \i / OII I mom°'/ / \ \ 1 / I V1 / I // // °-°cA 1 ) _l I l'I / 1 111 / // / // I zam I �/ DD \(� ay 0 N ■ ' 11\ \ 1 - z 1 \--� 9 r r 1 0 cn 53,9, I I I \ \ \ , / / 74 M � n z I \ / rn 1 oz Ai./ ° 1 I I j/7/ / ,\ I F c>r I \ A.� 1 I �� \ 1 \ \ ' / -� : w N. mm I 1 \, ° V. �_ �= Ill m1 1 1 t 1 1 `./ II I r\ mO AZ DN m D \\ 1 //J © \I I 11 \ .�/lam/ \ ZO D� Co° m 3 0 j \ \ ` I 't• \....��.\ \_ /T TIC ° m gm m`n rn Ill \ I ( I 1 �rn 3O P�.1 .1 �O = -mzio Zm w \ \ \ /II I > �J O �x z �m m _ \ 1�. D I , c I z® Dm m0 D D I\ 1 1 0 1 ill / I /" �� mmO =z m m I 1 .1 -I , Z I O 0 I r / I z I c m m> >z = \ \ \1 c - I N \ )- C7� m m m \ —I I ( l I - \ O DD N Z 1 / \ \ i I / -I r -i r ��mn I I / Z m D 1 \ 1 I I I•I �i 3 o > I \1 r\ I I `\ r/ N 0 z 1 \ 1 I \ _ 0 z I 1 0\ 1 ' - \ 1 1 1 I N I / R 'p0 a2:f n \ 1 I I,I ` \ Z^� of A W N - Y J \ 1 1 ` 1 \ \ .5 1' 8 pr mm N x I I \ \ I I 1 Il S' Zr ° 0n ° \ 1 s Noya y D a D I \ I 1 - -Im < °Z °z Z \\ I / / 1 I \co CI 0 D O r F Z / I m \ 1 C Z fn < ,Z W 1. I I I (n in I -mn 70 m y y 0-1 0 0 //' 1 \ I \ I o / -n Z rr m A n 3 nl 1 \ I 1 \ " / E,..9! 4 t. _I D ° v 7J Cr) -O 77 • m = m A m J J I / I Cl) 0 1-- D -1 > 0,c m \ \ / 5 \ z m 1:z- r W g. o �� ,-(� I 1 / i' I \ a‘'ti r = 8 °D z 1 I 1 / I \ 40 Z D / o C Ill Z co o m m m _s 1. / / /q� x D / GI) T -� ( 0 Z C '.. _ Nib m ) ) 1 1 \ I frl —I D m z° z / �1 I I I 3 /0 73 (- -I ITl : 1 ./. w j i) o \ I 1 ` n D Z - rn v �v 1 ^ 1 ■ \ �1 , p • �j -u z O G \ 1 r Z o Z,` m Cm-j m.2 -D- L / 1 I I -D �. D I, <A < ) /� _- 1 1 I ' _ \-, z :D u 8 m g- o \ �� \ 1 i \ . 0 u z m m frl I� > I 1 > 1 cn- D r J/\ \\ \ // \`� I I D 2A –0i _ < �° s (1 1 \ 1 1 1 r• VA Z 71 71 =Z L-/ I I \ \ ' \ co 11:::=,R �1 ° ° o'fj ( I I \ ,I N z � m ; __ m O m2 / — r �$ � \ - D a m 7� .\ /\ /I MATCHLINE SHEET 92.2 2 N N - -_ �' •- \ � I I \ \\"N Z \ \\ —\ I D \ — \� \ N z • \ \ /r\\\\ / \ 0 Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES\2011 Projects1211155_Maynard Shoreline 105_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:C2.x_plans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:22pm CAD User swinter. / I ' '� �\ Is \\ • iZJ133S3NIl!/ VW \ \ ( I ' \ , l \ I / \ ' L ; ELEVATION • —1, —\ 1- `� � \\ ( \ ��o N o 5 \ ®\\ I c{ CP \ 1 \ ,: '---------- : 7 1 , ). 1 *i-i /1/4,...\■ \ ,_ ..d ' 0 0 •o _1_m.A__—. - _! _ / / ice' ( m o1 1 !�I I I I o✓� I / 1 1 I 1 t �. 1 I / ! 1 / / / .�1' N O.Trrn Rl �rw • • rr - D I I / l i �/ / ....1.az I DxZ wr0 \i Q 41) 1 �I / / t / / - r x z / r 3 _1 1r 1 l I O 1 z a.. cn 1 \ m \ ! I 1 ! 1 j C D v / r T --I -I-I I ■I 5-'P D!n I / 1 t ` I 1 I 2-n m— z o-� I o I //\ xuo■e soma.■® Z ca 0 o I I mII ■ {gym I \ \\ r1.1,11 ( 1r r^c- m0 1 I ( .. .. > oo' 1 •I xzN- 1 `�' �x.........�..u! �` a 1 1 I Fo 1 I L._� I 1 \ m I �A ..111111111111 % I • ! _Lit_ ! m� 11 ( kk owl.: I ; I // I _ N EpQ I g 1 1 ;. o I I O l': I / I . I ii; (DA I I Z I z 1 I ENE 1 ( ) II p, 11 • i.,, . / I\ I y I ( ,11 mums ; ( 1 \ I z \ \ �'' y 2'/ I \ / \ i —_ --i y I \ 1 • • \ l \* 1% l.. 1, _ \ 1 \ •,1 � I I I \ p \ - • i i 1 \ '' ■..011.11 r I W I I Nv A \ \ \O I m x ( 1 •i �6 0 8 0 - -._.-...:.__ ......__L1-_ ...-!.._ z I 1 ' x fi +1 '_ C ) 6' vo z I / • , E m i 0 w o cn mw \ \ _ 1 I =i I z2 z Il u� I 1 F, a m I -' D CO 0 w A \ r //J ) ) II n m `� S` Z I X /I / Z O O O N o w •- a w N m I z L -\ z=z =0/J II / .. 00 �D _ � ° �m!n^ 1 \1 r I \ `—,z � 1 L- ni nKA0 ZZ O� A V^I .r T. ( 11.1 1 uDy / I . -nom fin,y om Z`2, \J g \ \ ` 10...x.1 : 9y,, =<w r m0 Az mm Om z boo \\ \ 1 1 \` \ \_. \ 0073 -nD hm3 o'3 O \ x I H�� zm �m zm °zm �� \ �. �I �n o N m-Zi ce -wi \ \ `\ •■1.111 o 8�.---HVr—t . I • r r 1 \ f •' I •zZ t%// /1 m m z z D I \ \ }�I \ I / \ I \ \• m°m 00 1 ( \ ) '1 y m m m m ' \ \ \\ \ iE I kl %/ �^�,\�.� \��.,\\ mz j� -I X \ \ \ `- / 1 ��� mm z o \ 1 \ \ \ I I ` 1 II / -i o o E z / ( �. .lam J ' IV. ` / / / I \ 1 \ l I i j \ O® "' o \ ' ' I 1 1 l I ; I 0 0 L\ �1�- , / 1 z Qt:ti p \ \ -_--_ 1 / `1 I \ \\ 1 � \\ II I •l \` / 1 A d N 4111 Cam zO m o° Li T 1 `O oz wA mm I I �I / = o , c m-I r--1 cw o Z z� 1 1 t I ®I �\ ° rn z clm Amt X'� oz ^ go ■ ,, I 1 I z / PI ;HHI UJ 1 1 r? I _ o z 1 1 I 1 1.�+?WA I /=1 , w O a I I I �a� 11 !A I` \�XI I 1- 1111 ��I�_. 'V.______---- ' / m i I -10 ��'0 3o m —� z ryl I IIIII ®I\� "' 1 X z--1 �p� m� m m m o<I I I \ IIIII �,'ir. I I IHvr w \ �3 �v -OiO n arm r r 1 I 1111 10240�� ! \ o I ar4/N, mx 022 Am ZI 2 X61 1 I 1i11 i e1�, / I -\\ v\ \ > / 1 4 at:U N "H e m mom >m c, a m,A 11 I IIIIII 1;,«�: I /I I \\ y - \ m -� I ) �iy' ll v r m r m'ol I I 1 1 I IIU 11•,Ir•� I / II m ` \ I"/ / I von m� =1wio oD w Ho = a ml 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 e1' 1 / II o m z05 rrir > -1 1111 1 1 / 41111 1 �'11�10 II \_ \ / 70 F{ m w r ;Si IA I I I I e1 1 ?*4 ——'1 �,.-0co oa 0 0 �. 1 m om E o 0 o A, II 11 1 1LJ9 ' III 1 t- �I $ I .o-°b m z I I I I I m 't mom y - 1 1 1 1I I I I I r\ I I o v 111 1 1 I ry 11I 1$0 Ae� I 1 \ \�I\ I \ \ 1 r + D I m T w m IZTI m I. I I I I f:!�IIII �•N6�� 1 I \ �\ �t \ 1 \a'� m7 3TJ m m III l I IIIII �i � I \\mot -mrl o -- �` -- z 1 I ( 11 \ •'�I I I I 1�'16��1 I I �� ``:,- �,�\� 1 m CA t r-i• - - 1 I I 1 1 .IIIII 111�� I ■.\ .s�- \\\� t y CO 0 CD/) f I1' 1 ■I 1,11 ; 11 1 ow+1i i i ,�,1�•4 1 . II \111'1 ( -�11 O 'X —I I I I t\ I 11 \ a''ll I I ���,�� I // .� ■\ \11\0 \ z m `:.-T' I I I t H u l l ,r I I ■ �- /\\\I`' ��q n r- .- -4- 1 I II 1 tl 1 11 "Ill\IIII \ 1 111 I \ / 1111\\ \ \ 1 1 1 O m , h 1 I I l 1 \ 1 1 ii " �1 I o \\ o°S i' \1\ \ Z 7J -f- °<m I r I j 1 AI t III I1 I \�n�o JAV�A m -� = ry I I I 1 III III r j1�^m tU CAN � o ow 0 0 oZ 1 III 1 1 1 1 III a I I \ Iw1�„\IA c ` X O 1 1 1 1 1 III I o y °I 1 0 O N XN I I I I ) 111 II \\ I � I 11\\1 z Z 1 1 1 1 I / ill I 11 1 1 � \\1,\\1 _ 61 D 1 II 1 , , , 11 I- 11 • r I Iw°i3 \\\\\\wwwwww A r m I I I 1 I III a r' I ) Pm\ 11\\\\ rn rn rn rn xi I I I III : I y-' 1 O Z C---...G o r - m rn 3,' rn rn rn _ 0 0 1 1-I i 1 11 111 j 1 1 / / 1 > �� l\\\\\1 -I CD, C--- °r °■ c� O u 1 1 1 1 I III I I / ( 1\\ O ---41.... • m .mi CO' m w nr •m _i ' I III I i I 111 0 1 I 1\ \g \11\ Z d 0 I I I I 1 i 1111 It I 1 I 1\ y\ t\fir Cm) va I 1 1 i I 1 1 1 I I i \ > \• 1\1■ H a mm CO -4 .wi .wi .wi .wi z I I i 1 I 1111 11 5i \ co N O CO t0 0 t0 0, O z , I I 1 A p N t° w N Co N Ca 4. j Cn 1 I -I 1 111 .1. I I \ F ^ a > m m o w SI 69 -T, m I I I I I I 11� I} II ( I \\ 1 e I I 1 o N _. 9 MATCHLINE SHEET C2.3 I I I 1 ' eI I I I 111 1 Ii I 11- a �1 I \'')', —t 1 — I IV T ro `n 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 111 I ;I I, I , I N .. Path:G:\WATEER RESOURCES\2011 Projects\211155_Maynard_S7horeline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:C2.x plans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:27pm CAD User.swinter. 3 N A W N ,° �1 I C J_ I)'I I II III 1 -1--1— I I I I 1 1 Lo= m D y (n MATCHLINE SHEET C2.2 I I I 1 I j Ho l l !1 IjI I 11 —0 p� m I I 1 =1 1 L I c A �� m m (_) I I I I 1 111 I I 1111 \ 1�23 m� mo z m m z I 1 I 111111 4.1 U 1 I 1 to , I j yid -,o Pm x Lik' \I I I I II I �1 \ y 1r Zl 3 O W N N N N N N N N N I I I I 11 r Lo Q mO r z z O ° ° c a w N o m ° O IIII I m�2 N - - N I 111111 T. I 11 I 1 o O� m m co m O I I III 1 I I 11 I I \ ' yr CO O = co Z I I I 1 111 1 1 II I II I1 1M ym v�-� oo D D z I I I I I I I I ` 1 II 1 I r o°m Z w m 00000000000000 r 8 I II I I I . II I j 11 ■ I II 11 -$ m ,. = A m m LI w m a N uroi .`.ppr a rNi rn '61 N 0 m Z i I I 1 t I I I / II 1 I I \ D D •= 0 2 Z N A A �1 �1 P O �I w �I m J 0 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 11 1 .I 11 I 1 l \\8 I I I I 1 11I 1 1 I 1 \o o m M 1 1 I I 1 11 I I 111 11 1 / >1 \\ I> -AZA-I D v uDi v 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I r 1 \ ,A A m z 0 m m m a m m m a a co m m m a z O rT I I I III / III.p I 1 1 �r I N N O = A m rn ° m v n w o -0n u CO N N o Z I I I I 1 I III / Io IIJ I I I x m m --I N N Oo .v N Iv w .P w .v N I I I III / / �° II 1 1 1 m I N O 0 a o J A rn o 0o iN a ° w br I I I I I 1 ?i I 1 D r -1 O D m m m P m o a w o u CO m N v 1 I 11 l l / I O { m D ,- I I II j i I I ! i II l\ /I \\I G7 o n < R I I I I I I I j ��' I 1 1 o �. Ft x o 8 7 I I I I 1 I I I \ 1 I m / R z 'I I I I 1 I / , / m "�'J m o D I I I j 1 j I I j 11 1 1. r / A ' O �' n I I I I I I I 1 11 I\ /// m r m m 171 O o I I III I I II I I I �/ m w 1 pl I I I 1 I II m 1<11 D o m r I I I 1 I I III Ili j 1 II I I . n m .- 0 = I I I I III 1 1 I III e- 1 r r" m I I I I 1 0 III II a 1 11 1 1 I z W -I O I I I I I 111 1 I I I I I I • -1i o o I I I I I IIII 1 11 1 1 ■ F g m o m I I I 1 1 III {1 1 I 111 I 5 ° -DI = ° I I T I Ill• II II \ 1 p. I _1 , ZI z N < °v 411) /I I I I III /� c 111 it 11 //r D 1 I I III 11 /•a m I 1 I I III 1 , 11 j ?// /\ 11 m '' 1 I I 1 III I \\' \} I I 2/ / \ 1 R. azm 11 1 I 1 III 1 \\I 1 I l dm/ \\I r ^ m rn PI a w N Il/ 2-4 N I I I 11 11 I I I j 1 II � `� p 0,,\1\\ O o v w O OD J I I 1 1 I I I 11 11 11 I I -1z Q i `" I 111 1j1111 I I 1/� c2 1 I j I III � 111 I 1 r� m -c C z < r� t I III /I I I /r o 1! °> t 4 � § m mo z -I m my A�a I I 1 III l 11 11 I /1/ �m r/rm F " o Z 2 2z -� 0 m O m Z m 1 I w 11 I O 1 11 I I I/ on mP ° _ a I I 1 III I I I I/ y Do m co K ` ? m T mN z m I I I I 11 I;al1 II 1111 1 - . vD * P O m T r 1 I 1 I_ iv I I y m n1n N O m z I 1 1 III m��J/ • o mss p 3 I 1 I X- II p_ c N N o -Di x .D.I M / I \ I "I 1 1 1 1 c,> Im A A m x �m / I j ( 1 1 B �m D (2 D -1m / I r I o-°m o T No on o== / I \ I I I :rl I I I I z> w Dz <� *oK ! ® t I I I I 11 I / I I 1 z c 0 o m m' �z <aD-m{ \ I I I I i 1 m I I I I D O c 0 m z$ -O x1°�1D rte' �\ I IIII I o 1 I Q / o D Im 1 oi 1 I II°y 7 p O m D o D 1 D w / / °� �� 's 1 1 / i °�r o m z o aA D� / / / �`o �ltq� 1 II �`} �o ` �/ zZ ^ m �z D a rn , /ii I I I\ \ 1\�0 0 _I r 0 I / ri"°r'/r ice/ // (\\ \ ,\ a r�l* ■ In = o A W m / / / / 1 /./ //• I I 1 \ \\ 1 1 ..m / IT1 O m D m m / / r. / /// / e. `\�'`• \\\\•".xz•\\ e 4/ / I I® m l z 1 z o z o 1 1 I I ildi,.., , \ �� ,,`' rn m m O / 1 I/ 1 / \ 1 a 1 \ I 4 co cn y = I 1 1 I iii iu' 1 1 \ m Z m N o I I // / �I'1� itryti,� 1 1 / 1 / m m o o A l l 1 I / 4441"/ I ' \ 1 I/ I m m o g 1 / I- / / / ' I / 1 N -i- z m r 1 I l / 1 I I / 1 , M m • 11 / / i I I II' iII.: / ".Ca I z -Fri I I ! / I I I r 1 1 m Dio "a; nr 1`, o vo I // / i '0 .0 1 1 1 1 l 1 l n /! r` o o� Il 1 I/ 11 I Ill r I/ 11 11 I 1 e //// / z. -9 s 0 om I / I 1 r 11/t 1 / 1 ////� aom I 1 1 I I I I I I l - /// >Z� I / 1 I I I IIII j / �� ""',l� � L Z I mm I l _ _ !/��/ /l zi / I I 1 I l jii/II% I f IA 1 11 .m rrl l I I I l I 1 I ° e m2 1 Ill r \i i 1 r rr 1/ I I l I I I r Z { iL7 C / I l 1I l C m I D ∎1 l� l 1Z :t7 o p C -�� m 7i -.� I C ° I!1 I 1 I / / 2 A i 2 -1 - I I I I I \ I I /1 . o° z / I I / I r' ( 1 I 1' �cai � Z z / I I I j l l I I °n a co z2 ° o / I I I I /II I 1 I 1 IN <o L m \I m ° � � ' \ 1 1 \ \ \ 1 / Mn ! I zA u u \\_ 1 1 1\\ ` / / I r `3a I I a \ I I \ \\ \ v ° ° o / rl, I °i o II \� 1 \ \\ \ \ . r' '• N I I a N 0 - - .� \ \ \\ \\ \ ,\\ / 1 /�_h/ATCHLINE SHE LP ;1 ■ \ \ \\ / yy I ET�.4 N \\I \\\ \ \ \ 1\I /f `j / r I I II/I I i i N • Path:G:IWATER RESOURCES\2011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90percent\D Filename:C2.x plans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:33pm CAD User.swinter. L L J ca- II I i II I!j \\ / 1 ! `\1� I ! I 1 1 1 1 \ 4 \t,1 �1 ..•)_'`t I ! ! ! III - ---- _ ' r\ N O 1�0 Co W V Obi N A W N ° O I I I I ! I I I 1 I X tP A ' 1 I 11 1!I ! ' \ I R, I 11 II II ��� i !1 w w w w w w w w u w w u „0 r `I \\ 1 02.3I 1I 11\ I P. 11 \ J J J J J J J J J J J J JCHLINE$HE; I \ I , �1. I 1 1 I 1� -1 m \ \ \ \ N I w w w w w a w a w w w a p \` \ \\ \ \ \ 1 rn r Co Co ru e m CO CO Co Co Co CO z \ 0 Co a 0 0 o J J J J 0 Z \ \ \ \ ro / 1 i o w 0i il ill t)mi o <e v rn N o -1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ tt ,1' / ('� W Co CO N N N N u CA O N N N 01 1 I \\ \ \ \ !\\\ - 1 I /' , A 1 1 \ \ II I\\1 / I I AI J l II II \\ \\ II 1 11\1\ // ,„ ,IJA I I \1' II1\ v � IAO ! \ ! ! 1 II1�\ 0 l IIG o� 1\ 1 1 1 1 11 \\ , h.� ^ I III/ \\� tIp0 ,-m 1\ ! I II 11 II 111 II I1\�1 zz m> 1 ` 0 c °ca 11 1 ! I 1 ell II!IIII \ >, D z-< I 11 ® II II N o �m 0m I1 1 ! I! \ I 1 L-._ - I• !ic/t;) i i I f I I R 1 N Pc 1 / l I ll III / 0-> / - � -- -or < F g 4 I II I I mE/ % 11 I (III / 0�m / ` r ---- --_____ _ g I7 i A 8 . 9 1 1 I oAD/ / f/ I /II I RFN 1 I //i I -__-- ---m T 6 K ^m w N rn 1�! II 11 "°�g % ` /( j/11i C°n nI B / /// /1•- -I� - •v mff mm - D (I) I \1 ',-y'° /// / / iIl =A- I I I II" /i 1N a vmi m Y CO m n ■11 1 I /1 / // Il J m/ i l l /f l / i ro z m 11 I 1 / / / gym/ • 1/ 1 1 11 I / N >11 w z z 0 1 II I\ (Nkio/° III mo, 1 1 I/ I1,1III Y/ ov z m m CO ai M I 1 \\ I I\ \\ ooh :, I ! I I I l -ri 1°n vDi rn I 111 \. 1i ! 1 1 1 1 1*1m v� n = 1 1 1 �� III �* l''' II I i i 1 1 , 1 / 2o- 1 O r- E I Q b III +o I 1 j 1 11 ( , ovn 3 n rf z z m rn I • 1 ■ I \ \ III 0 0 ti I I I j1 I / "D-'- --I l II F.. 1\ i = c z z I 11 !\ 1\ \ \ 11 11 / / 1 1 / 1 1 1 i czi Cr\ ° -,• 1 , --, •• I ! \ 1 \® III ! / / I / 1 1_f 1 w om z \ ` o O rD \ 1 \ \11 ( 1 ! / 1 1 1 / cw m zZ J��� m m m m I 1 1 1 \ \ 1111 I \ I l / I I�//1 lI Eo = z o o I I / \ '111 18 I I 1 I 1 1 / / m 1 I I r I I ! 1 \ l I1 / r I / Z9 Z --1 1 1 1 111 IIf1I / 0-. n • m m z i v01 1\ i\ '1hl\1 "\1 ! \ I CO O =11 m D < m° 1 111\no o -mi i • I II Ill \\ tC• v 1 z = I c I 1 I X111 \\m z I • 1 I II 1111II / Q O t D II m l X11 I 11 � I �IIII , I II / 1 rill /I i/�jl I® // 0 O om z n z I I vj ( ( 1 I I j 11 I'/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 j,71 0 n 0 m CO 1 I m I II I I lil! 1 Illillfdl l-II (A Tv 0 o czi . Di II I I I I I�1I i T lI+�111 it�1 I � 03 g m I I If 1 i I I ! iyi, 111 11 f i XI m z I IJ I �m11 /� � jlllj1 1I C-I m --I 1 1 I I I 11 I I I IIIj I I C1� �' o I I i I i i4J'ft 1 Y / ' t, I l-1 0 I I !! I ` / 1IlIl I I 1 I j 11I l I I I i l m ill 1 1 I I ( I I I II I I1! I /II �,1 I z_..........N rn . I I I I d 4 r:w I IlI IIA�iG, I /\ \ I I K I 1 1 +y '' 0 1 j I I I I 1 I era' ' 1 1 i I —. I G") x 1 I I I 4':ii I III ll�� \ —J/ �! w I I I-x, I I I ail l 111 / , 1 \ o'sa ar,r n Ii '- ' I +� I I 8 O I- 1 I 0m-z y I am I I Ill , I I 1 \o p 1 i E I I /f 1I/ 1 Il l f l c I / + i 1 ji..1 iII 1 ' 1I I j ai 1 z ! J I ' r i f.lI i i Iii 1 j 1 /- I II o I I ,,rT" jN _ i irn O I I N /;////IZ;'(rn 1 I iT7TT2'TY',/' It I+ I i 1 I N 9 1 I r l m I i; ::) D v I f 1 I 1 •� / / m xi o 73 + 1 ; 1 1! I1 1-1 \ m I 1n //iiI o \ m r� I I I' 1 I t i 1 ll /I "h / 1 C7 o z w \ m D I I I' �� I I1 l= �z I I I Air I/ // ; ! \z. D F \ D°�A I I I r�r - I 1l1 ll I QZ xi D . --/ . m /1 I / r ••,,, 1 ° I in I1II1 I� i s+ \ \ , Cm D a N I I I I % ; I 111I1f1 I I \\ Z--! :O rn m 1 I T / 0.1! , I 111 i11I I- 1 \ -G m 1 rn o ! 1 r f I 111 1 1 I V -�j m oT 11 ,1 I I / %n ! I I I/ /I I I I I / X14 ;� / / O o z ! �,/ I It° I I,1 1 111 1 1 1 ;':S/ \ co o i i i I I' + ��" Ij I i I 1 111 i i I l i \ 2 -I o m 1 1 I I � iu i III 11 1 I II 1 1 /r L\ \ZO �nI!r cxi I 1 I I I �;r Iz 4 111 1 1 1 1 I I I � / m o 0 Z I!'!1_ D 1 I I I a M f II1 IIf I I 1 / () m-I m N c I_J x y / I I I I 111 I I/ I I I I m 0 70 =� - a z1 / I I I 1I+4`. /I I .1 1 1 I I I ZQ I=n` � t m z / ! I 'I Ir! t,I 111 1it1 III M 1 ! I 1 I 'I�0y in 1 11 I I I i f v g C7 " I I '1 I %?� 1 '! IlI 1j 1 I 1 1 f 9 "° g D // II 1 : 1 �.ai I I/ 11 I 1 /I l 3 ' - m r I I I 1t.'1yis ill I/1 f I /I y I I -I �t�r T 1 111 /I I I I l MATCHLINE SHEET C2.5 \ I I *� �l#lYP Il;I ice_1 1- o tg-r°t r3 / —T —/-1 1 b a;i s I 1 , 11 11 N $ u . N Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES\2011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_ModelingICAD190_percent\D Filename:C2.x_plans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:38pm CAD User.swinter. }\ I II o„,i !%' \ tl I I I I }1 ■ 1 I li I;� \ III 11 } I M1 1 I y� \ 1 t ! , 1 LiJ I !� fit' \ lj1 } 1 1 I \tit / _ l 1 1 .� fl,� 11 1 CC \\ \ 11 1} l r5 W1 I i 11\10 11 11 1 II II 1 � -t1'•\ 1 '1 1 r!lis q ti;y I' 1 1 1 I ice. ya3N5 ° n cn rn cn cn a a. A : I \ 11 I 1 r1*/4ti 111 \II} I I ' y Z7 0 0 {n A w N O to at J W N A W O 0 \ -1 }v! y gild�� I I -1--"1<_,' D v v } It4 'j '3 111 } I I rl N \ \ 1 /1:'I 1 '1} 11 I Z 1 I } r! r►' 1111 1 1 1 } (� ri Z I I I • 40,t • 1 1 m CA w w w w w w w w w w w w o --1 I I 1\ >!r,•_�t�•;►� II } V J V J V V V V V V V V J '� r- \ X , 1 1°m °m ,J w °m a° o V o o °m °m o f n /C 1 \ ♦ � r °o. I 1 } } N w m o N m A w N p, m Z _4, bm, a N 'o°, o . a a '�to r; Pma o o Z / \ � I , '44' e I ., III II i 1 I 1 11 0 °m rn w '1 0 o m N o] o J J -:, - i p1�lp 1, 1 1 / n ; I -18 r,i'0, 1 le 1 1 /( O O I I � 1- III I I 1 1 AI 1 / L A n m I I U �. III 1 1 1 1 } I y ti v I I t ,l!`It 11111 11 I \ I \tO00m03mtO � mt0mmA z - 1 1 1 •y„01� 1 1j111111 I I I r O, ,T N N N w w w w w N N N 0 z 1 • I I.I. ° m w 8.p m 4, N A w N N 11 7,1� 11 I i 11 Ill III I \ ' m O, J O N W O ., O N I , R1 N u, i0 ? o V O N cn N N m to r n J n O N m N m rn ',--"I I } ■ * �A 1 I. III } I ti•1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1II� 111 I ( I \ r 1 1 1 •!i I '1 III 1 1 1 1 I I to 1 vmm 1 11 ` ,Ii 111 IIII I om \\ °<cA \I 1 1 i++i \ ! IIII 1111\\\11)' ' c vm / `n \ �i�, 1 \ M}+ III \ ) I I I1 ` r �m � m } O 1 1 \ yf 3/4 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 m m/ } -,1> 1 I +« 1 r� III 1 1 1 1 1 ' o \\\\ .m 1 II 11 SR 0 111 i III 11 1 I III \\ /^`N \c0i,n5+, 1 V i1' 1 II 1 I 1 11 11 1 ) I 05 In b��� mt 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 �r .m. °\ I \ y e ot. III I 11 1 1 \ ` \ z \ 0, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ∎ x,, r\\\ \ 'l 1 1 11 111 11 11 II / ` - —�`' m CZ' \ \ I IIII yo i \\ \ \ \ 11 Ir+7 I I\ 1 I } I o mo - \ , \ \\ \\ \\ 1.1y�r el I I I I I \ 1 \ O iw. m 1 \\11 \\\ \\\ .2 �i l,, I i II 11 1 11 1 11 \ - m } \ \ kO R, 1\ I 1 1 1 1 11 m \ 1 \ 1 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I \ % m \ \ 4 Ie \ 1 1 1 \ 1 0 \. \ \ \ 7 I`;1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 \ m \\ \ \ \ ' ,ty, I I 11 1 1 \ le ���� - .\\ \} 1\ L I ll I l� I m/ II I I --, . \ \ �" �- .)0(/0 / l I l a I c) i \\ \ \ `T.'��'M 1 / / I 1 I M 0 0 P W Iv _'I •� \\ 'IN '43' L� E�t I\ } 1 1 / I nr c s vu mx Z \\\\\\ �.HM<t a /i-'l ,/ 1 m-0 v N D m �7 \\ \1 ry� __ /1, o vi D m w N -n c -1 m m ■ ���. ..SR's♦ II' ri D. W m m 0 \ \.,. --�.'�♦ )7}�ftto.v �� mCZi 04 x 0.N Z m m co m m`^ m o I \ y o m m 0 N cn VJ x rD 1 zz N rLI CI D D fJ x Z 1 t�0 Z r rr" C D j r I A f-- Z ,�.1 m m m mm 0z -1 --1 1 m° o I �X) N ✓ 0 rD" ° m 0 Ito o m m i > M- 0 o 0 p y a o O SAO NA - 1 p �A °P D u z< 0 < m T rati -f1,W �/ . K O O x a.4,1'..-.1,-, ,. ,sr lr / o AA� D � 11�;r����i �`�AfW �YIA �w`i!\ N m Z z O ,ii ' r` G�7 aI''\\\\14''; P / z o z ° I !rri�4� +"i a\ 101 1 1 �r�lit I I RI cni o {.I, ►�t I +01111111 1 1 �pir \ ■ > m z I �Io! I 11l11I I i!i \ / -Ft— 0 m0 --1i m ,! I 1 1111111 I I ?�♦r, } 0® m m z •" I Ipso!it 1 \�1}1111 II I /�i ' 1\ // / ,-p 0 -f 0 O I I F%4t�i l 1 1 C >• - m f`•••b, } 11111 I 1. . I } / C) m z 0 1 I�' 's�, 1.1 \ti'\\\\1 11, :'%', / /rod 7 -1 = m 5 }1 1'41 PIS,1' '+01 1 1 1 I 1 I j 1'-1 I •.-- / 73 _ ,1 I I .rn IIIIII 1 1 1 1 \ l ® /'� G) 1 l 114r I C7—I z, I \`\\}\\ ',r , 1 I lb\11 t 1 ) 1 1 "Arai"-111111111\}(,, I \\ }\\`y , ,4,,ot 11111)1\ 1\ 1� 1 \ \ 1. � \ \ CA 14 \\ 11 _ x -o=a D-m o - 0 I11`.Iy�tl 11 II 11X \ \\ \ \\ D A Am O cn i , I 11 yif� 14 } I I I I I I 1 1 } \ $. n �O �yo m / 1 I \1 '';lilt. \\ \\\\\ 1 I \ I \ i :: \ \i m l 1 1} ' i o \�• 1f I1 a I I I I \\1I 1 111 \ 1 I1 \m om1 n o z z -- I �\ d, III II 1 I 1 m x z -D1 0m Z m O \ 1 ) I r;,I I 11. ! I \ \ o_r:C O --1 o=o = m \\ i1 I II, '1 of / 1 1 11} 111 II I �AVV o' �- DIW O m 11z \. \_\ I/ /1 // 1 I,y� / } \\111 I \ ZD �� Z —I 3 °D A o m m 'm / \� 1 l/ / / 1 1/j ` 1 1 1�1} 1 1 1 } \i z o ccn m 73 pi A x *w 3 m m / _/ ` \ ! /r I I 1 rit I 1 11 I,\\1 11 \\ \ o -P1 O N O < =m m A I �- \ 1 1 r 1 1 1 / \ } 111 1 1 I M C/) —I :<< D =1r-m m - `^`� 1 1 1 I I I I lliU I\ \ 1 I r—w Q C7 m r N Z O rn m c---,...7 I (I 1 I� ,�1 I II ' % I I I \}III\ \\ \\ 0 73 77 cn o' \ / l +� \ IIII / I Z m >- tai-1-1 - ° z = \ \� __ 1 \ I i I 1 `\/I I I I I I I I C7 0o o \ } 1 1111 1} • • 1 0 Z -,M & z N O I \ 1 / / 1 1 1 11 11111 }0 ■1 \ CM O .. ! 1z x.15 m 8 \ / I I ( / / iii%!1 / 1 I III1I lax \\ \ Zm D r " �� �' I \ - \ \ I \ i i i N \\}\1\\\ \n \ * Q 3>''D n m ( 1\j\\\I1 I ° 1I1�II ^t" \ ��\\ ■ 6)› Z;= i mm \\\\ \ \ \ 1 II I IIII\ -\) _ -I ' f�� - m I J I \\\\\\\\ 1} 1 111 110,11 1\I I I \\∎ \,._, Q Z _ II(� •. = m I \ // \\111}\\If Il I \\\1\I\11111 I \\�- Q ` A I o m 513 1' \\ / 1\I\\\I 11 11 1 ( I 111 1 / \\\ 1 ZQ j • Nn \\11\11 I 11l tll f _En n I J =o Z `\ I\ ( \11111}111)1\1 \It \1111 1 // C4 II I �! i 9) I % 1 III\ 11\ I I I 1I1j 1 1 \, J I" 0 �=L m 1 I �� /1/ 111/11) \1 1 1111\ 11 i \. c„ ; z `-_.__ ...'� 1 \ I / 1111 1 11 1111 I / 0 I 1 1 1 11111 IV o N N p 1 `� \ , \\l l I 1 1111111 1 I bi ` ( `� 111\\\ \ 1 111 I1 11\ \ ( 1 111} 11 I \} 11 \\ 1 1 I 1, .-, \\1,111I ! 1111,11 1 1 L Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:C2.x plans Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:48:42pm CAD User:swinter. ...-------- / r ... \ \ \ z f . • . l1. • . •• L 1 J ( D \ \ 7� . Ti-:I z /I I V.m .\ , ,—/ 1AON \ 'V. . ` . 1 \ \ / �� Z \ • ) :l ' • \ / r..hlih) --I \ -'\o ; vim 1 . . l \ . \\rrrrrrrrrrrr� ��� , , , \ \ l \ \ 1 . _� \ \ m 1 N N .f \ ) Z \ \ \ \ ' l < \ I \ \ \ \ 1— \ N m m ( I / L. l ) \\\ \' :1• �I__...J 7z8 \ \ 1 1 , •\ .. • • �� V.°Z 1 1 . „. • . . 1 M0-0�0 \\ m `-I-II \ \\ / ( i.'-'s • N N O �,,m Domv gmC ( . \ \ \ p ` zmo gii �O�Z°O 1 Cx0 / 1 OAm Om� Z / 1 \~, u�� .-=,,. \ OZrr9 / / I , 0 owG 2=� „ \ mm-Ni ( I • Nc) z<m� z'omO1Xm 1 -zip -In o;2 v�'"o�cn I1gC 1 1 i D� n°jam 000000 IZ�IN�1 1 \ t ° ,, 4 2 Ao zF.,'A� or-��omm �m�°� N \ \ ' 9 Q z 'tea)° "O20mE "T_.O\ \ ` •\ . - g �S 9 I o> 2"rn�crn rA'v, a-° "corn \ I \ .\ Ei m i A w Iv r �D �m�C> yaym .tea n I \ \ •c -t S NX v v m N -in ZrN�I-mid 2r °zm GJ Dr.� 2\ N \' :A m� 2 N 0 z v) m (n r1 ZN a y o= oo /rmo ( _ \ I \ \.. n o y Z �� a / oz \ D I / l •I • O N m T N Fri FT, ` I� r° m N c / oZ�,\ I I % N -DID 00, z Z 0 I - 75 7a * o I o m 1 \J I \ I \ •.. O o'O Z m \ D \ \ y \ \ \ . z� m to rn ( coi \ ) \ \ \ 2 I Z r r \ \ \ \ Z �\ I \ \ < p���/� m 0 , ho, 1 I_— — { ) I / \\ \ \ \ zQ �T\\\ a z Z D m I ) / \\.._.^\ �J \ \ \I m m m 1 f J // \ ) 1 = m m p r J \////( `—\ \ \\ \ `\ \ D rn 00 2 c /�//i l�rr \i \ \ W p m O //// 1 \ \ \ 0 < m > //�r l I 1 \ \ 1 o o ifr /ii// _// \ \ 1 \ ) 0 o -I a //iii i— ` \ \ l \ .n Z 0 2 I_ /// / \ \ 1 \ ® o T > o I //�//i / \ \ �o o A 0 ////// I / / N \ 1 n o 0 ° ° z I `nom \ ~ /ii/// /%1/ /� �\ \ 1 \ 0 m—I.99.- w -Zi 0 I ?Z �///////iii/ I I \ \ —I o 0 0 //t,////// 1 \ \ Z �°�Z ;//�1/i//r \ \ \ I 1 m \ / r,// // / \ \\ 1 _ o \ %/i/ /%// �/? \\ \ \ zr°'7 \ //,o` //// r- > ( om /// r// \ \ // /� // \ /ii/ / // Y J ` /0 6y0 sTAe .O z n K O \ // /r • 1 /r/ //r / c NOyp N Z rA z --'�\\\\•\\\ice • 2 1`/ _� 01 1\ T D Z r p Z - -" - -n m -- o 6i t -n 0 m m c o R cm z ^ .TmJ 2 m O o .m rvmam 2 p m Z UO v mrn O ;D °m r < o`-I r,, <_mm c rn c ,` ; Z v o W < o g X -"" n — r m A D o -CJ m TD�� `0 1 8 cc z 0 - ? . 0m N °�°mo Z .TI Z ),. m mo z zoo_ 1d fn rr zm o .[,1 I v y Dy n ymno � O ,- i_ a�u O O 1Pi 2 N ,m-mo p LI ;I— ° Z Z --Pi 02 2 -I -Z I�� • o m 0m m o 'o 2 _I rrl l/ p W o N m D Z O a D• 2 m n I I O O D Im xo I m I1 unu -OI -n m n '''-is) O 7, 1-, -J' m r 2 N M 2A - Z Q v mm u m o f`I I '' C.' m O o v 6. z r s D m.2 rn "� z m yo K m ° M C o y m m ."I c N m � 0 ° b r N Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:C3.x_sections Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:58:02pm CAD User:swinter. ' L cr ELEVATION ELEVATION I N_ O N O (T 141- O N o c, I iIIIilltIIII II II' 111I 111111 II III III IlI{1!! 1 VIII D z L. I __ ..„_,_,.___._._,...i.....:I 1 I AI III 2 O I: I! I I v ! p I 11 !1 K w--!-I-1" D CI 1 I _III 1® 1 I- D I I 1_ : , I II i y ill 0 1 0 Ii rA ii.' '-' '� I 1 ELEVATION ! m m \ A I .- I I- i-�. N N, i y I I ( m O O CJl O Gl I'O CJl o i�-_j�_.,I\Il -! o --1 I1 � n ,IIIII��jll ,I I �I�',••! , ! 11 1 I� :D 11 li i' III' 'III D I 1i I.� I �. _ ! ..II -Lm_ III 11i I1.!II�'11 i!IIII Vf ' � II I I'cn C" III III ' II 11,1 i ,. I i II .° i rn0 I II_!_1.14_H: I II I?I 1 I� 111 11 'Ii )•11 II 1 II <. "N0 2 0 1 11V '0 = o - <I I I° 11 I (I 1 I I I I ={ m , ,I =t m I - I l I IIII i! II 'I I Ii•I m rnA I; I rnA L l® III u, o { 1, I : i 0-< ,1 I, hill III, 1 ®I I I■ OZ °BASELINE®: IIII:III 0Z ! II, I l Il I; II III�I •11i; '1 II I! BASELINE o 'III „ II 1 i. Ill'I w ° ° 1'�I Il.l II II l II Hill I I. ; 1 11 To, 111 i II ii'1 + tn III it I ' (I + iI col) :.! III: I' it °0 '0 I 'I li 'I'.I III i 1 I I--- -; -1— ;WWI ZI _ t O i' Ti I I I 4--' 111,11! I , I ° 1 0•l I i 0°I III!! ',° I o I l ! 1 -Il im z - 111 ,1 2i I I N N I:� ,_,...._ ____1_�L.I JIII,-.,_I N I I_ I 471 I i ° '.I I,/ 1i ° -::111!il III .1 '!II p •1 II1. !I I I o I I i o Ii i, I ;III ,Il, w 1 I , i- 'i w I - ;—I�' I I III I i i o X --' o_'_I II I I-I� _ ri,l 7, ,1 I 1 'Ali t-'I J I I-" -I ir 111;1 i m z= .1 i I® w I ,IIII 1'I .i i) 1111:I .I i • +mm III E:': oF,,I III' II II ;,1! i, 1111 prErZ0 j , i I cm,i 1 I 'I; II I I i F iii III o iI 1 1 z i i I1-1® "nz 1' Ili'I I�z' 1 Ii�a., IIII' 1 I ' 1-1 I IND ▪II I i I 1 1 1I I 1 N m �` IJI ,!- I fmiA m II il� II- °m I I :! 111,111' —_y o w -• ° I I� 11 m� I I ° h III '1 III 1 1 1!1 1 I I N III ! � 'II II it ;i ' 111 I li .I , _ IL;N * .L 1_ l,l� .mm—t I I VI I I I I I I 1 1 _ A O N O CT 1° Tn. D 1 III I I !_ __ I L. Path:G:IWATER RESOURCES12011 Projects1211155_Maynard_Shoreline105_Graphics_GIS_ModelinglCAD190_percent1D Filename:C3.x_sections Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:58:08pm CAD User:swinter. ELEVATION -10, D N O u: O oTI 8n-171111T l 11 �_ ; I ! IIf1 11;1 I1? o i' II i. °'T 1 I xml ' ;i_ o Z>T I I I I 0P 1 I; I R,D,' I �11,I I I., i 2 Il�1 l X ' N O' I IIO 1 ° 1 Vf I'I•~ I I® IIII III CI I ,11. ' I:! II 1 1 111 1 m ° 'WIT,Tfi� o ,I T 0 1 r1 BASELINE' 1 i I 1 I IC i ;,I I :■ ELEVATION ELEVATION 0 lA I I li I I II II I1 ft o N o u o T. 1 11111 , III I I cn 1 Iu ° u 'o N 1 I�- I 1 I 1 Ill �.I ° II i! 111111 11 I,I ° 1,1,11 .1 1 11 I II 1 , II I 11 I it m II 1 ,ICI I --'I Ii1l; 1 I I'li;H 11 I N , Ij 1!1 o II ■ 1, T 11'1 ° �I ...111 1 I 2-Oa' I ,1 :I! 111 ® I - O VIZ-V=1 I,I 0 1 V)1 °°D I1 im I1 I 11 m ° ' I I I ° min., l l , D i 1 , - °>!'1111 i..�x '1,' '� I o -r—, llll I--0,. mvliom III\ =I v°°' 11-•mil II 'II I1: rI ix; oJ-11 -'mil j�< o:" w I F1 m 41:4 1 - rl 1 I I I IrR or I I �� y I I D. II _I I I o�D: I Iii. r: p OW _I�� J_ —_D N 1 I m D — I 1 ::: .Z vA 1, II IIII 11 y! N 1 m1) I '� 1 y' I li m x 1, ' L ' ,III 1 1,1111 i 1 1 r I+I , -I cn Z= ° II I.i. 1 .III I I' ' o___ II I_ 1_,11, I 1 I_. I fill III' O N I o �I __ 1 I1! 1 III IIIII I,._. I' II ° I I' I m ° I ' 0 BASELINE I IIII I. 1 °BASELINE ' .:1 III I I III 11'' -1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 Ill 1 ( i l 1 1 IIII I ! ,I III '1 l 1_1..!I I , 1-I I ' ®i- 1 _ 11_ 11!•j m m ! .1 LI 1 '_ I I IIII 1 • ' I I1 1• g 4 ° li e -i� II IIII- 1 1 o '' 11111 11 ° r l 111'1 111 1 ° < ` < o I 11 IILL'. 1 1 -,- .`:_ 1 1 1,— I III_ D D m m V) IA ° o -p_._.__�I -___: 1 1 1 1 I to '17 mww II ',III ( oN 1 III O l ° W -. - rT II l�h I ! . .11.1,I 1 I I I1 I I o E ji IV o —11 1 1 I 1 I'I I lI I I I IIII 1 I._'_I I '�- —1-1. co A O- 1 j ;I I I- IIII cn m ° ,.ii 1- _—111 i n III j I 1 I I H , CD') --. .a :_ L;-i.i r{_�. .-I n Ili m� 1,/ 1! I I I m x ' III 111.11 I m x -I' 11• '°- rx -®-, 1. o N •i I II ,I ;i1 n N ' IIII'i� o� (� _ ° V> _�j !Will I .I z1 �°-- iI ,i III11_ I-r. z 0 1 ij -_'.�;II '11 rn-D\ m j 1 iI ~1 Ili +°� 'I l I! + I Ii II y� ° II �I 11 I I� G 1 HI Ill 1 0o , 'ill III 1 iI III II I N__: 1 _ - 1 rE ut 11 I: 1: III I'1 _ 'I, i i. I I. 1 1 I _-i — ICI 1 11 I'' , --)..-,r1,1! I lIr I .I-1 ,, !I 1 III I: ; ° ( I I ,I.1 1 m rn i ti 1111 I IIII dill I I I ° II 11 O .1 .Ilr'.-!!II Ii•Z 1 O N O N O J_.1 I' I I�1. - 1 1'1 1 1� ! 1 0 II 1 ll I o �i iI -I� 1 II 1 I'. :.a o IIII '- o _`1 1 11 I Oo ELEVATION 1 1 1 I I I I ,I CI® I N O N O N - - I I I ♦/D ° 11I1III i l l 11111 111 l ' ' 0 ' i+•1 111 I I 1 Will 1_l. I i l! o' _'J I I I I m N I 1; IJ 0 D 1 , 1 f(( x .I1 1- 1 it o (n 1 H I! < I) I 1 111 I_l! I I , l ;I I 0 y_ I I-c�ur i II III I) ---!--1- i I I CT I I I I I DO,:I ,ii_I I I ' I i, I ,1 mm ---171-1-7,- ,� �i I 1' 1' C)�I I I , �ao ° 1 I 1 ° /•"j i® 1, ,,J� Z V 2 i l I j l J /; • . 1 -- I.1 'till O 111:7-7,, I'll 0 1 111 I :1) I:1 j I 1-1---L•!---1 1\ - ',/- 1 - - 1'- m� ,r 1 ° 11 -r1 1I o rx _ - III 11 II' l h7 i II II +41- 1 ri_t 0 ��� 82108 �j = ° ▪ I I I I �I III I '1' m i, I 1 . I.:11.8` a• ,( i I E1 11 I II I. 11• W 11 � 1 l lI oe N BNE 1 o nm ° ; :m _�:_1I— o w 1 1 11, I_ 111 o--rx '- wo 0C r -I 1 1 I ,1 N11 u)2 I lI,I,1 I, 1; N o N ° 5i_, D z 1 1 yl1 0 11 I 1 co m c71-771--H 1 li 1 °'1 m l I i i• z x + III m _ !III I_ Ii'1• M ! ° 1 I 1 II ° IIIII ! i•Ii l'1 TI T ° I 1 IID1 ..LI Z .77 ! 11 '11 1 I ° N O :8 NO ,. M ci = o i F' OD = o I I 11 11•� = c� A I I +11 0O D H a ,1-111-10!1-1 Om I , I , C zm n m y 1 L11 r = ..N I-. -- I 'I�� ° lI II11 ' , cm I �1 m o II� � I II Iil�! 1 II •, r 1 1 17 I!; 1 i, •-I �I is 1-10 O Q z 1 l� I;i I 11 I (7pj t F ' rj , 4 i y1/ 0 U. o ,f-� ��1 III'C I ..Qt. ■ �mZ ° I ri 7-11 p>rI Z -i T1 D , I - 1 , ,l; < I , 1. D : Z -Da 01.11' ,, 1 fl f"I 1 0 --- -I , n ° 1t11�1J1 ri' �I I� II1 m irfal° l l '9� m n 1 1 m r I I I 'l l O _ : ° 11 I T !! • cN_ ; 11 X11 0 w l' N 2 11 W N a Z III 1 1 I N -I o i (I _I_ N 1 O N - N (n , • Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects1211155_Maynard_Shoreline\05_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD\90_percent\D Filename:C3x sections Plot date:Apr 13,2012-03:58:18pm CAD User:swinter. 111111 IIiI 1111111 IIIIIIIII I'Ii 1 IIII Illi '`II "III I1iv•IIII L iII X1.11 rIIIIII �' I li!; . 11 1 F-m!L ,I ,: I,I 1 m !III:! jl _I 1y .I i11 ELEVATION III !Ill ELEVATION E n o n o cn "D ! �I - o IIII ) N O N 0 N .iI II I2 I_; II� �I1111I� I I ki*.. : - I> <� I j '_L V 1. IIII)_�_ 11-1-L•I■I, I� .. Omp 1 ! 1 I I 1,'I _II r-1 0FN o I_I I 1 � 1 'j I II I': -�zr� �I_ y�1 I; IIII x I wd O• x 1 cArrim D !o I Li is -Izm m 1 I I-._m• D i I ilj 11,11041! !je !II n a 1 I I' I 1'm=0E :::I III m' III ° NI; 1 II I �1 III O 1i 0 i 1- 1 : 1'f I•0c III 1 � ''•! r0< , 0, ,c,,11 we• •!T my o I l j _"oD I I I=< L t 111 A ,III N \ r. ;Il /I/ I It -z ,?2, I ° Aol i O 11 1 I'Ii 111 i �VIDx •i I_ 1 1` I : L_I 1 a I I Ili r I lit rr1 W,l I I I I I I ; III CPO o 1 I m 1 11 +� �- V 1 'II111 . III 1111111 --IV 111111 II' 1 lzli o II I oyl• o} , - II , • -- ,1 -1,-Li.- -I E::•1 m _1_l I I I x _ ti�m7 m _I® 1 i .IIII III I,1 ml OZ � , 111 'O D �' Ili 771 I I m - Z0 IiIII II: IaII vin 111111 I 11111 I 1 1 m °F cn I I(- °m_,_I m w BASELINE! - I I I 1 • 11 I1 :A mi m 1 1 •I N zl N ° 1 1 II ZI 0113,41 1 1 1 !'.-ii.:� . I1 I z. w :.I I IIII 1!' 1 1 O II i,' i 11 ' If. . ,� 1n'; I III II --< II I! E II' 17 INi ll I II! lI } iII 1I IIII1 II IIII c (n; I 0; ' I' 1' 111 ° --"-+M-1-1•-•-•-,--I I II 1 J.• j1 II, I mOy1 I 1 III IIII I O IIII m� „ II I' ICI �N'�. L I 1 _. 1!.. I ,I Ill T ,:I I IIII I II+I IZZmI ; Ii 1 11 I I 1—,__ I:I :l o I I If ••:i I Im=o 1 _1 1 1 ,1i I I I 1� Z I I I I 1 =mom pp ow i N __ ' 1 • I • III I m < 17 I I I 1 I m ° I' ! I 1 I ' ' 11 v° - 1I I_ I. I 1 I Ill 1 •1111�I11111111 I°m"o o -Df9 ,1 1(I !!-^^ I- �I .IIiI ; I ~01 O I moA 1 dI 0I A'<I fll 1 I is p DxX I 1 I�1 p o �� �- I �_ Hill I i I I Da = OI m ®I m I :1 1,.:p∎IIIII 11 "I ran-) \,' n' r :A IJ ZI D III 11'11111 1 I 'I III 1, I< I I1 1°ml +c� ",L. of m 1 I 1'111 11111 III i rZ _il !_I_� ! Vo II III : m1 1 I, I I 11.1 li II I 0_ O , �._ I AO m �( I •_ 11.l I1i;!j Ii __(I_ D ! I® , III IIII I_I m i ; Ii m -- 11 ill IjI III Ir� !) 1111111 I l I o 1 1 ICI II., I !IIIjI 0 I.1 I' I-, 1 zm1.II1 I Wfli!I ` II 1;II _:i oo o cn o o i 56 0 i E 0 0 1 I f 1 „I to O 0 o U 6 c o IIII;F III 1lilll!I VIII' j N m 22 m 1 1 1 III i 1 L co p WDI :., II i11-:111 !I'III;i �z ru 0 1, I I 11 I mm I O `K N1 i 1111 1 T`COC.I I ' m N II 1111 111111 I I � I ®� it I I I IiI`"I, I I I i Az° AIII IIII m° O N m � I I \ 'i �o O I, I I I\I I N m I (( � \�)�� " °zz KII 1111E ad CK:I ,r` o r °v n1 • 111111' 1m'1 y� �r � o m x1 I 11?I VIII Z�1 ° ��0'.! z 1 I m � �m,1 O O ! I ( 11 Nr.l IaZ OZ . DI III 1 III zil m:I v m °I 11 111 mll og31 m o D 1 .1 x ° r O -11 I 11 D 111 Cm.. Z z• m r-' c l 1 +, ' I y,�•I rut m I , Z i 1 ° i z I i ! ! I ' H III 11i1L i �_s - 1; 1 lit ■ 11 : 1 1 00 II 7.r O N 1 \ .I I II 00 < ! 1 I III CO Z 1811 i I - ■ ELEVATION LLLVAIION i I P Ii' I :I I 'II II I I I _ NN D N (J; IN O co O N —1 1� t } II 73 ''II ° ' Ili 111 I O I III I[1ill 1 1'11 iII I' III 1 [II! 1' I!' ( 1 11 1i 'l 1 1 I1 C TI 1 1 VIII (_i it I i III! , ,IM91 ; 11'1 .III 1 0 I I II II i t I ! 11 I I( I I DN, I OI 1 I' 1 ' III AO D'� Y I O -i=�:; l . i I ! I"(1)I1,__:_1\1 I ®! z 1I III! III III I !r ' 1 rz�\' J I II. IiI I. 11! I I +4� j I1, i tnoRI' 11 1'I 1 !II I 111111 (IIII I "'D ; IIII I, I E mmm 11 IIII I IIiI WI II :I Ow mI 1 11:1, ' o- ,1 I 11 fl•11,1' 1 1111" I 1 ' 1 , __� IIIL _ I lI I\ :.! 111(1 1'iIii 1 1 I _� ' - Ll .-1 1—i® - 1.I. 1 11 .I I I 1 1 I: $ II II III I I ! II E I 1 ` I I \ i i'fil s�r� i i'1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 0--H+1-1-1 1 1I I o . l I ,I III: ;,I•1 Z A.3. VILE III II, I II -:� 1 I LI-1. ! q :- - .� - _I I —�N_.. n • I I I I j zo I !WI I i 1 III I °~JO I 1 I I -I 10 I 1 1-' I 1 1- K z• m IIII I ,1 1 mx II 11 I � n 1111 �i 1 I:4;I D OC l _I 1 1 I ! ,i,' Iii Q -1 BASELINE 1 ( 'II 1 I m = BASELINE '!I I 1 111 11' ; =173 O 1 C) ''' O "� < < I it 11 I,p 1 00, Ellli I I I 1I II 111 Ii i 711 v� m O 1 I i I 1 I LD = IIm1 II II II x Z � J.4.44-I-14 j I II 1 II ir Z +II IIiI I II IIII)LI. "rl T I I I I !' I I. -,III 5 m I• I I 1 1 1 1 N ,-I_ I I: ii I-T11 ��n m 0 I+ I I OF- ° 1 II iIj 1 a Lill'< it III,I _ III en z A 11 WI1111 i iII• 2111 ° I I 1111 �, 1 °� II �i T. cn O _ I IIoI II I 1 -Ill, 1 __I_ I Iv 11/II ' I ! 1 ,i/I I Zr�TI C7 °b I : J III I oLFr r = m 1 m m _I OC ITI Cn -. I •I: ii m 1 I �, E I I I 1 j D - r t^ : (O I, D o - ' I 11 l i t dx l _ w I / I ° w a� I .� ..7— r---r-- 11 1 I i1 I ' zm1 - o ° I 1;111 --1- 1 (� o °--1,,i.'+-m-'>.„1 -i 11 * 0 I. A ����, l) I l i I ��1 _1I I 1 111.1 I. 1 ri 1• 1 Z ;- i 11 - o° Dm1 1,1 )°1' Ivv II 2 -I , 0 11 I' It om --1> IIII„ 1; 11 III h of II(i-, SOT _Z O I I o-r�j 1 i,. , r- 1 i ' r o m I i® nO"4 ' 1,(� Z 0 Ao 1 ! I I +41 1 I I I .� i - - 1 IIII w y 1 1 C �t 1 I 1 .. ('fit- 1 I I '';'I'�7 -I -i O D IJ J I I i I ' I I I m t�1 1"1_. 1 TI-i ' _-i. m 1 IIII Z2 J o In I I11I II I1: N11!:1. II :iII �' N III m -y A v I I I III I °N O (T O N ` ON O 0 0 N i C ,I , ,,H,, ,, T v 11 d VIII ., III 1 IIII c) -, W i • - II i IIlI i I 1 1 I 1 1 w w .m m v ,I • o o cn az o n o i w Al ELEVATION • Path:G:\WATER RESOURCES12011 Projects\211155_Maynard_Shoreline105_Graphics_GIS_Modeling\CAD190 percent1D Filename:D1x_DETAILS Plot date:Apr 13,2012-04:12:10pm CAD User:swinter. L.J I ELEVATION O p� •<� ri � °o g,,,.j v. ° I II I I I I I I I o y o - "2 P of of Is $\\ lf-I ,)_I OC rn r'z F Bm ^1 Ko0 `•' s\ \\ tiN O qoy�i n g1] ,„III 1- �mrm,1N . 0 oh�m m si > °zN m e '�. b \•1 III I : :� a>2 In��'ccis 5 'ho 'd 1n ? 4 ° �/ _ \\\h' \li I Li .Ia�m m .Z1 o3 o gm .� =;o is i/ / • I I!II� I NAAm n a�° 8 0 �z z /"7. \` m- ° I, I it D r)r Z >;z TZ E mo_ r-� /IIor fQNf> 4 L///'8 x.D Z .III 1 it * (43 -1 °og<z ° ,tte/J'/ 4p 1� ° -I !III IT:H:1 g�p n'� Q NL° ply O 'eF/�' '� I .I.III I zNm� Z illy o! •n N A ? - rn o 0 1 II I I DjNzm* m o � Q D Pill I\' 'i vAOm n ��� F c s f _� �^ m 0 I =_I' III 'I !I! 2 n D .,I li" II �I ' mI I .1! £ h z III Hu! !!;! 02�r�� N A Tit III' I I, I• Z ° I IIII■ I I;!' --I I I I o,l a I IIII I !m,; Q I.II II < 11 1 II I I� y to 9, 5 a N y Y W to ... 2 2 ° IIII 1 f,l� ..4 m D$ F1mm IMIi ,g> �4 NH a ll l!_I li _''III ;0 zA ; P2 o � cs 92 OA mm F'nm a III EIi _II °a g� 4 m yy8 .o,1g ax yy <<�VV.11,@ C ON •I II Ln o S Pi' °S :0 U 9D '1'7 • I 0 m o to oo �, F Ow,r s`i' o, 0�� i N �ia"L:t cN m >o o>i Inpd mm >c"' "� eppi' 4 43 s n! On5 g g �s op 8�F N g . F4.- 0 F oNA --V, z a yam' 'IN o cm ~ ri' m ELEVATION o 1 °�+ 1 ti w m z > to o N o to 5o ° � 2g ° vo -, _<N mu �? , OE Q j go o,c m o; p> —=c — o*gp $ $ X 2 o o II"i I I 'II"i P. 2 °5' mF1 p�c 2 •mo §8 f zm' gm� F v i 4 f% m 1i^t IJi l--I� I I''I I-I_l i ' r7 m i cI.0 '>m I> 2 Ao H °a?I Z rn K s c 1-N1 g9 y+m o O! II z cE i=ce i0 r n5 m ov wo = vz a F �9 k\I' N W . . 1 IIII I...;I O m i g g§. 22 g o�'i w 2g KF >� �\/1lrlltijIlfl�.` 24 N I !II` I.I n Z = 6 @a h °O En 3 so y� Ai ii 1,1i)'31 A li ow ° I I a m m '� I41 c .,_.. n�_ o m 111 m I"I'I A A X S,NI A1,1 <°<1"y 1� °A u1-°1 ° F N III! \) I C ° IO mm mN� O Trx,1 AA g 21 ip ' 1 �ili-- I;\i.' IIII 42 ; r1,, ,g mg ..° ° 49 c m o 9> ' mm 2N W N �° .G p A I I MI"l I I M oY oz m o J IX 8.51 o - c 6 2 g4 °'a ,yam �_; =R . r Az `� I � iv ON ho o m iz gP" �°''r � a O II1 r -j Th I a m 2;,' d 40 w M '�— _ " r-oo I I I Ill z b g m Ay ° ° ° 2H € F_ -"--1° i ! ',. m pi a m 7Z R € i � =FS a J> W I ' l - i 1 o m , °m l ! �iz s n 4 IIN 'l m C ' 8 OO '22 g_ '-IF ' A m 4 2 z 9 m az - _ ! _ m III � l I � F m s - D I ,j -i ii 1I/ .l momma-n o° y a 2 m _LL l 2 SDAD'lllill!~ I , � >A;"•V s Az r" ° Z 0 R2 ' > Z-I I l F_ I Kx r-° 1 2 o ' E N 3 0 .Y-- I >m):. i ' '11 °'1 r�r0 I • II I n, °�mm mm C)o D 0 I ' II z AOE a v I " I nz N I 20 A T ' I ' i I I v -9 «in E cn pi n 1 . c . m 6 s° /r m m S 19N., o to N 410 . 1—(1"YI "I z = pg Z • 0 C _ — z2 cn m n° F g H m ` g' m2 Y 5,4g :: 4 sraTd iv n n � $ P i W iti>�� �• mom m e s Mt c NOy9p` � 3:F 'A6�m g,-1111 o I( IN -p-, P L D 1, D O v _.t•,qe, m z0 m AA I y- � ` mA �. = c7 y z o Il/ Z D om oy '-z1� ?°, n Z •'.Z 1 DK *m> M .l c m ,�I 'i '" • yD omZ e> Z ' i ! X. r 0M '© I!Iiii m pi,1 �� "I", N m m C-3O .Ny ° c 1 . I i D 222 m m 1Li&IhIb Z'L -I �� o z-1- :0 I Z ' " a Z O °/' - 'DO -OSN -'9j ■- . ..1.4,:::JECTSZE.N.WAT4'-iR .',..:i.,....iF.,..:11'f,.. ..firin.'..ra!,,....,..,:,,,,,,,"..,C.,,,,,,,,,,, ...i.'i. ,.:,.,.,s,.C,..i.:.t.,,, :,,,,,,.,[.: ,,...1,,,,.:6 G, rITLE'...:,.1-1:iii7s i ,s,..,....,-,,,, .:,.., 2-.1 ,.:0..i.,1.,..;:.!.:"...arr. -- - 1 1 k..k..."`- * -A < -, 0 ,,,...., 0., r- -45 • -0 -0 03 ›r- 8 03 -- 0 i9 .-, x 73 `i', Ar". L7(7' X ic, #1 . . Is. K K _,,,„■,' - ,I: 7 '-ri M Cr rn C, r-_, CI >. M ,,..r1 fri )4:. Z „- 0 .5 X X r' ,,-.- .;..f4 0 -.0 < i-r", Z-: >> -.. 0> -40 E , , - 3;6 g A > > x c> ,,,, TA- Lt l V) '.,' c'' Z z 13 --, -• -f -, ..... -4 20 .al• 0> Cl -I , , * -1 'III I C) ; K . 3:04 st, 11 A q „,, , 2 Fj X Aill ..... g ' In._r n _.,., ,... .0...... .,. ,, :2: ,::: '', 0 ..c. 71 'a > 0 m x m '--- X A, 0 :41 21 Ca 2 1 x 0 - V)- y -; 6. 2 Z _ cn .z m -... 1 ;i-; m z 8-1., A CA .: i _ IL * 5 m m ("1> „ ‘,:.: -I 2 .- ■ g I Z 0 rt.; • 0 C r. 0 fr 0 ..,i__::r-'1 1 › * --4 > rn --; rn m r) co z 0 (...,, _.. - -, k. 0 a .... o * m 0 . , z > z> > 1 . . P 2 ei'K ,...,0 z•E', 0 ti ..*-i M 0 X I 0 z n ..o 0 M ' 24 x < v) -i in '0 13 X M Z r ,: ..,_.,.,,:..c.:.,,,7...,, ,....,....:.7,,..-_1 :n:,:_li-7"i'-!:-:;,:: :),::.-7;'''':'::::':141.4'. .. • , .l::-.2'____::"' , . ..-..,....-..- 'rn rn m -t 71 yo rti m T .:k- m 1'1 22 CY 2 n n c 0 o m m T X C F'zi x z 0 0 C > .7) A ci• a 5; C i 0 tn o - 2 0 -• Z 0 rn X •Z 0 > :1 Cdr.) r- Z .. '. ,.,- 0 • r,--s,:'-',. ','i'r i',L.. '" .-. : • / 't :\ t Pj Z :4.7:'..'...t:.:.1::T:1.1.11.)-:-'l'.. '*i• ,, ... "' •: . . '.•? ., • . r ., e - ....:'-17"--".-5-4 • - • i'•',4:..- -•, .. .-. , k L... ./:...- ;. )111".3 . Fo E rm ?„ .., •,',..,,• . ,..-..."ql'i- -'''ZI,, . '‘ • . ''' .-. '.,",..,.. -.N. .. , .... _ g a 0 Ir. - 1-', ,,,)LH:i ,''''r.--- -----7...._--, Z CO) rn • ..• ,,..,..„. , . ,,,...• A , -, : k, 'i.. r.: , ....:i.„ .01 , . ..- 9 („7.-..i.-.L.r.i,-; . .,,i- ,..,:e.,...‘.: ) , , , . : if:I,: , :, . m G) . ci) M . f •-• . . 0 > Z - , 1 .750 ••': .'..,...!' • -„ / • )1• • - . ' ' ..!. ,. ; .•:',..,..711.3!.. !.; ' - , 1.• r•!i,. 'a4.• .' i 7a n , C.) 4,:-, - . • $ A -0 2 ' ,'`, ::.::•J-;•:....)•.:_,•.'...'"':,:•;;:W..7 '., -.. -":1',:•':- .H..:*-.. ,,' - ; timui g 1 =I I i•-•,:•",,.:U,;•':i::„.;...',. •; ;,: 4:17:4,:.‘..: 7;;I't:,:::::IN.1414,..,4S.,,,1,. .4 ....... y, ;....-.. .L.,, .. , . ...... i ''' / 0 z 0 t\. $ . . . } . , tt •-• 1 \\..0, 71. :.r.., ..,,,-, .!,-.', .; - • : .,-.,-, ,-,.: , .;,.....:.; .•,i. • .'7444:r.,...- ' . '. ''i. •''. • ' . ' , ,'' , . .'..V':■ . '''11 i:j741 '' tIMMI E .5 0 V t .. V , ._,,,, ..„.}.'S`,.'_7'.'''..1,..,:.. .,,,,'..,:::: L'.."..7 '..•fr...1 '':';':..-''-',. ' .7 4 y , 2 411) ,:,. , .:,•.,_:: ,,•., . .. ,,,,...,..,.,...: : • 0 • .. ., , , --•.:v. ... . , , .,,,... ::... .., ....„ .. •,,. ..?....„...,. -... . _ , . ,_.4.• 0..-.5 Il , . .• .._ . .:-.-..„...- ,..._ . .....„:„.„...x.:.,.. .,, ..,, . . ...,. .. . ..„._ , •,..,,....._. • ... . : •__.....„, ..... ..1., 8 )..,, , .;, :...„.:.....,r , .. . .. . . R ,.. . , i ''•- • - . ',,..,..„1 - r- ,. . .ri • , , 't, %Y.,* _ :....••,...,....... ,.k i! trj (11.4) 0 , -,-,,,-.,.,fr .-_,-,-..- -- ..(.. -7,-.. . .;:f1,- ti . : •. .. ... . _-'--n; _-' e--L.'..I'Lr '-. ',.7't-,-. ir4. .. .,:.-, '.. •'••• • • : im....4 tirl > . .7-z=•-•::".. ---' ---.4: 1. .'--.2., 0 -_•_ ..,.. •-,. 7ti , •_ _.. . , 4 cviPornr- i' g • . 0 A >0 z z , -0 m b c-0 o -1 . , I ..< . . .. ... , 0 , -D.0 K 0 . • .4,:( ,' 0 m 8!.,z.,) .• L. . .?:-1.lyCwilt .! z. 8 F. -..g... l• CIO >. Po z 2 5-■ -e •.,..:2 w -77---.,7,-' ) .7-ktr-,,.«„ -.-." 1-•`-...'' ''''.!4■41Q.."61,. ..i.",}..i..•-•... .::•-;.;":44.:-- •••• 0 • .2 ,.) , z z corl) .1111141V ;; •;j12 r,o A> 0 0 0 - . . rti >g "..::_,-:-.----::7- : •• _:-(•;--. 7. ".--;,-I . •,-...„.. ......--- • - i4. , .., .z z -t) '.:. • ' •,,,. .r•,„.,...-- ---,,,-; ,-, • - ..:1 ••• •.•.: •••••,' '.:_',4 -o '• ,__4, ..(,:...*-_,..-'f.,.........;_ . ... ' •: ;. . ,...„ r i.. , °mug ...) ..- • LIA,t. -'---.,.. -.7',;\:i . ,.. : ,. a-' ' . 2 ....- '' . *.,' ,..--,--:''"'y:■."1e. , ' • ' ' ' "-_---1 ' 1 ..': " .' ''''' . ":.•Q , „:, , - ,-,' ' • 0 CL): ,,,... Z ''' .'.'-"'• ' !- ,,,, . , ''C.--- .- .-. , - --- -•,. . '•,' ,,(:n .. -),,, ',`.i.1:,_ . , ,- __. I Tr-----j .: ._„..- i -•''',-447,-..< . - .,.,,i.„' ., - . . -,... „. . . .• -,-.- . I;. .:- • .-,t;,_ --•,..7:,.- .--6..-41,.-. .. T...-..? ...'-'0;\ )'- 1 : ''''H . ' I, .‘;; rL: ' 4!tl.,.,:vr?.,....,.',.)1. -:., - .,-L ,.. 7..--, .-•,,,_..• • • ),le \\ 1 0 ••■ 2- -. 1'.' . i ..-. .‘....., , . . . .L- , ■ .. 7 7 '''' ,,-%.') / - • , , } k • • H ,•,... v,4H'...i .b. .4.,. t,,,, ,,., .T'.,,--•--. i 4.4'. -1- • - ,75., (---:, - - "•.•`• '''. ,..„.... .. , N''' •...:.1 : • 1 ••••' .: 1, 1 L . . , . ,. . , .. . ..„,..,,.,, .( . . . ..: t.....4 . 9 ' : 1 ' .\ ,-tr'' ..:4'..:-• ' . ..--.S..-..". .. ..]'.1 . , , • e.,....) ...2.,,i I I w:64' +4. , ,_ i l'''..1 -,..,:,.....„„_;:•.. 4"..t‘.....7. %:-(,,,,,...,,,...,..,.: ,,„:,..,•• ,4,,,,,,,- 0.4 . ( .., • = li--3 iminei ss.............dw. . .,,,,•_::....i..,-.-• ' . ....S. M 0 411 CI m 4, ' ?.5 rr ?!5 g ..,. 5. 1:r, c' rA ?‹ mmo( g 4 „ 0 0 _ .... 0 2, „ m i„-- :-...1 -4.... øC) 0 ,1 ..-_- . _ "2 - ±- z2.... z .z zz Cr) n z a a a a 0 > ••-• 0 g 2 . 2 __ 0 0 tm 0 -' .T., 4 C) 0 0 0 --- r" AE."4 ..... 0 0z Z X .4.--- ',44' ', Z Z -4 --4 X 1.1 r- -4 -4t 0 0 0 A) ': .. 7 r- oacc mo c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 ..... 0 c 2.1 X m -.1 -, CA (.4 tot ..) N.) S..1 N.:: S., ro -• -, z . . . m . . A •e.,. '' •-: • rn -• c.,.., 4..1 -44 en CP 4.4. 4.4 1.,.) -, 0 0 M *1- R• C3 17/ A.7 7■1 R. CO al CO CD c Z CO CD rti 2 1; ....k m .... .,,.4., A. , 0 0 (1) rn r,, 71 f,1 0 rn m ›, :•. '2.; O „,.. • 4., 4- >c 0 rn 1 1 2. :..... X. I .1.: I X m r- C, --1 0 : -u .--4 Zi 5 > vi 0 - 0 0 - " 0 E 0 .--1 z o cn vi , ??, -I --r- > c --- z ''''' 'LI 2, 9i c' .'e)' 6 •.' -g...4 X. .4' C-1 Z G ,-,' 2 9 2 1.-; z z c •A, 0 0 •••< ....., < f1-1 Cl) C tn C) 0 Lc' ° z > nt z 0 Commi M CA Q , > at *--I in et N.) -• x 3. . ..P. rrt q 0 0 c) s zt t CA tiTill 0 XI x c, Z M 0 -11 I I 1 0 0 z z -1 I . z o C M M * o > (11.1111) -u z Z X 1 -0 C- 0 rC101 (.1) TE i •* I I ! , 71 H . C.) I -4 Al. , ........... -, _. 0 i 0 Xf Z M , -,4 ..... 70 0 .44••• - .-4- rr 77..... 0 rrl Z 0 .., c.7 23 •-'• . L2-' rnz 8 " = m ,- 04 rn CA OZ) 0 i.." 0 rrl 0 -2,.] C 5 "0 -4 * ,.•--; 1 --i r- 1.. ..j ....'' 'ta Z 0 r•-• -±4. A 'c P1 5 m P.., m IA 0 41..... i .7.. - 1 -5;.• 11 -0-° 5...• rl 0 x 0 1) ,;•., , •.:... x , z.,- ,...... 7- - — ...— ... j �'�*'11'..--.h+� x+ a3`' y- r. '' -A , r " '.r. . • ( 6.4.�• ,,,, r,-- } •r-1•:' i . s x ` a �#( s'f'w•,r. .i :,•ft, rdJf , 'k,Y:` , r':., "• • 5 .{rdY^�} }+x' - •" �: i g Sri - w�3 ,,� h : •'f •pr", y , . .N' .s - 4;.. fit" .•9^U -a v "p, art - 4^ *,. Y ,e _- • , Pk.+r :-r- ?' . 'r i'y' ti7'y , .r, .Raw fi_• � `.• ,V I rte, ;i '-•L4,9,: 4.'":.' ' J - 'l∎∎•• 1:5+ --Y. :i. - ' n ,i ..F• . 'r"k ''"t"L,'p". r' % ' ':1,�.w' `, ',,.. ..r.r _ wLS' i-•;$ k.r{•r � tires A ' ... �. -y kv. i- • s• t! j ': r� -1-?, '. r. . ,p 4 -` _ A .af- r F s 4r� . •,; .. . . -'c'" ' �� ''" ,�4 _{ ,, : a ' 'b . , t .---_:.• s , #•' _ r .,112.•:-.,- .;Y ' r r . �i f L -,T; a .. './.......' `L-.s' ";4; _ . . '...:. .• r- h l.. .am•.• ; ' .. , y':7' ,f}. K ', r.' . ii;,4 - • i i. c y. 6..:":1 'Y. ' :-'r• :�'` � ' ' �. r: yy . J.y g' ',''a„ r y _ ,•.� :..: :1;. .:7'' � }rr, i {{ ` r,... , ,sue ,. .i . ,g.,,:R }:: '.>f 3 •''+^ ' k.Y };.' : e V •,•:„... .: •.:.: '1 i6RTy^• •4 .. h Yom- ' - i. . ..' " ,,, �, .. i .� ..* ..r'- ,', t; `.. rr '. �` „; = 'mot.. < - -' .,gam! R `*':_ • >f.<Y '-s ..41a +: _ u: ,.. t -.-Ld x.`i'} ' 17�..x ';,• ?G t •4 + � r 4 r. r „k%' 1:.4.,....... < r. '�L. .y. .} v..t.. , ti-.• • '' jr_'f&M1 '.....2'.•: t :::.*i p'f� .J." rot?' •'k 'Sr:'+� y •••L 'a�4. - • �- 4"..!:24, <' r` '�'r' -TMt `r': Y'� •- . = 1"�~'''t' vr,? F;• \ •{„ r .VI' tom- � ` ,.dr. - ty }'. L-.:• ,} -¢ ,, .- ,} .y-• lAkti - ,'!": . -\. . \,'',.' ••... "1:-- • glillirilyp.:4:7: . l',.;,_.:•...X,;"C:' •-_,: .%., .: . • • • •,, ,,,,,_,.%.-_,......:.;. ,,LF'••••- :::..-404.1:-. ' "- . k4%'''.' '•• • . '••■•(1 1.,..4 - ..,1:7,•:•,•:..,....,„ •• ,,,,.- .344,—.:Iti.•• .!.,,,,,....,-,... .,....,..3-,• •• . .....,..;_,.-•-•.,t.... ...:„...,. ;-,,.... . -..•: ...q-.:::.i r , _ '•';:,..• .. L '1 � � ,3 ` +4 •••'..,, . . . r'. j;L ;+L'..h ,.F.• . r , x . ; •Lt - t .' \ / •.- 764...-. .,''',.i.C.....'.i9f,!....:, ..,41:7;:.„:.... ray b ' •2 'i' a�• 5 , t54:",,,;;;'7,f1'.'"..'\\:' '.;:1:-:'-;.6. '.:..:......r... ...:7''''';'.> \ ,,.i.14-.r. !-4!•..j.t:#7;_':':'':....:',11.:':.eq;;;....,1'1:.:.'"I'-.:: ....-.7::.;-",1.......,...:.:,:":;:....,.; ., .,,: ` N-1."'),..1.5._.,i.'‘'''....S.•'4',.:'..:;.4"...A.1:...1:11.1. . .:• ...\ .• ../;....:. ..i..:.:...7i.'",...1;t11.,, .4.77:1:. ; 2 0. i : .:7 1 .r L amL ! !W • 6' ". X •>++ h• �f yi eelf .• r '3' ��. - ;..LY r tIts r {r�,,[ 5, - 4� :• r s -.;. _......:.....7 ii - 1'. '7 rte. . • .••••C'C'lk,(e. .., 1 ■ , /• .''' .' .i:--l.:l::,, .-,^.:....'-'N:•4.:.'.-..•--• 1. Z4.Vii. .T• W ( tit . •a j ,f :.i ;A-:,t ' ... • :S ` `y 'fir' ,5•sfi psn `t • '4' . -7" - -' •• - ' - - . ''''': ..........z.‘,2. •-.. ,,-:, • z -.i ' . ., /li .,-'. • 03 �J M47,1' ' ';,i'•;s` t `l - '�a , •...',..). Kf^ vii _ P „ `�.. 4 JS 4`. 9 J ,"c!' .a^.tea:,, '.,3°` ,i7•,4,1:,. .i. ry . _• ar�i� � : - ,'4,,!- . ;,- .•r, 4 ]'y •rte_? { yM1 Y' y,j a •iii . 1 i�i�_ y ., .. _ __. 7.a., -< , i". L_ ,1,�+ D 0 P >O Om mm O Q ro bC1 a7 t7 >*: m!R CJ G}DOn zt1 Om p..r:t vv toi 'O ro<'� ND-i Rl - z O (nm z M zO mO Z>0 t4-+O OM mO =X MO= MXM -i :t+ fJOm a Z C7 ...... -e- z� D z.`t.�1 rn ro X"r �� 0�3) Amtzis m D yam x p•n m ��->1-+(tt ��Dp rn '> m r t,, m m�S'}. ��pp '..( ty�$ mm r"K of r rn rn in C•n r Z GJ -}•� M C/I u t 7 �E A * D x oP yr> m3 ]J �Np� mD z� y <� mA7J pZ f-0,ft � < mC0 ,p+ 23 2 181 %-.. '' . ( 1 O a2 gs� Z Df1 O-n arc v-0 n O_ m- r� O „ ,- » i .� �. 1 j Z O K-r 2-( Z y WOO ON-( 2"h -1O Zm Z r� > 0T0C> Mmt-la CA O '� w w Tc -ow 7 O to >O �O am0 iii,,,1-1 z-z0 ,0 z 'Z''M drop z O-4 O n Oomx O A7 0 $ " c I r.i mm mty{ to � �r C -(te a c,g n Zoma o�c�ao >, �i> pv'y' C>irn� my ym��Z ���� i" Z 171 �— v' N rn k Sy y .� Z z OZ� © xS0 �mx Via'>O m0 Cm ezA t�x(z(i �>•r rp�tA TOm� Z i'*•1 : 1 , 1 . ! Or .3 O p 00 -.(cr az o50 toJnm m° --co ma n xg >rr--{..,m ,a®�G. O C, f .......5... ..... i _.'• x z < A CS rr- +n-( 7D mmm Ozer z ©0Z 62 > D`20zln G)<•b (Ti ---1 } ( m-Z O O{ >_ m>w y r -r tom �m O61G O C , - - I <F., ern- -. m :° rim 73mm 2ms 332.--it E �, '�m0 i 0T iri-OO� -, to m Z 73 - v m :~ ; (.I O> - n' m ro - or o�rKc,. Iz> XI�yOC -a� �-; AyBC mm O- mm.yynm t-tnn+ _O m 0 I .ti -• , mz .0 O m �' m zC >r q3 mmr Crr-SO c2 �v mZtn 0x fm Q'rOrn O zcm, �} '< o -. N O Z m m m O x h m Uh m 0 ro O N rri ,.. I > r NC] m rnZ O (!! O Off•>-x C r�r -1 �) iA )m OO D n rn -‹ m F4 A O :VZ.> m- t Atnm lY .Z CG?A•,0 z .O („1 1 ' rb"+ 4. : x•n to n =r > -r -�z m D m X. n Gl C -r O m +:n m O Z'',a D JLn'� c ( a t ,..n z� x u� V+ S r z >0 Qm0 - >, m t m0 . _-tea m0p•(0 r< m -�q Cl) C I ..._._. ! rm ,TT a o m� �+n m mi v O > ''a ' oo m t mm zy r tn0 „z w? HI g �, o O'+ m ,;X�OA 70,4 p x<�O> <ro !mzza 0 7) ru a f -ro - '!r > m r (F(] w y ="r r-- a Z- ro i C-4 z {r m m m �5• Oi a ...I to 2 } Z +^ >ro tlD roZS'i ZD' >9 ~ p3"� �Q 9i xOt+%rrnq N > m _.,.... ._... ......_;_ -nm mT v' m Ov, rp c7� O�Z (7m z cm Oe>i �m0(�iyO 3 8 cm *m m- om Km m'-O m= i n 1 2D Dar a in j, y'-�L �Cm =mG7 -D- S Z dm � O 4zS c.m O h m ;n ,n ro pro ,n • „ NI Z pA ^C- :} 9 �'h >`C W Rj.ZJ��' w >A <:C! ,p, Z ��+C ��-'��o.1 ai I p- Om O� } mar- -P x m tom m Z o > ZO g m n .. bo pm,9, -+- i7 w C's>mz >20 c ■ m Oil ' N -r G 0 �mN 0 X -i> rom r. a 'n 0 =( ro” > zOZ Fi Oz ao q rOn DOO `` ,; m > zm Q a m ?� :- aacl a < -ry o ziaz6c`iz ' t `� �, 1 0 GS m OV7 S O m D m m m 0S. ... A A S O Q mom; tD rn Z 2 m O m z r7 Pte.C: '.,....... ..: t ,.t•.:• ..Ish'I :C2:it_glens Plot:Apr 10,2013-0747.34pm t } ; ' t f o- =`,a t ' 444 t I - j g I s }} L. ELEVATION o Oo w itau N tt ifi 0 0 to 0 4,,r, t. 4 kT ^ : "°tl, t i i S r 7 r 1 1 ( I t ' S tt e lty5 �i � d � ,� L 1:11 igi aa..1 Q m,� .i t. t77't.t ®a [ { - q °n * ."rS' ". T. �;r - .T,Y s'. a lap � t� ' �} - - § I. I. I ' I i al I SIP"'_ ] r_n , , I tr i ' I -� W c7 c. i i W is tot 4, ire W v Co z .1 % _@ E I 1 t +d .f ri �3 *.3 t y } 7 I P' v9.*4 Z I 1. l,—t $ 4 k 4^' I '° t 7 , ; III 3 C " 0 € E l t }� t \ �1 $ i> u_ q I 1. I _ �.. �} �, v c e C i 3. 1 I t *I J } 7 7 f f e } 'I ' ; ]ate 7r.A b A b A Y # y7 ,t= t 4 Al 1 ! ( • \ [ Cam} '-'s j � 'S c Ct �. f f'""°°'--�.. t �. 1 S.z: X. pJ I . i I m7 _ I � a '—€ , 1 , t i I a I y^ �1 µj r. F �,„ i i }vrq #.. ✓ t { } 1 S yI ts3" S t t I ~^t t Dof , t ^7t °n I .I ,�• ; t t � • ,-I # ^^+7� I a: L �i � try4y f I Il S y t }f fs' 4 tc, } 4 1 rn I. If '.» t{ �, r f 1 i 111 1fi < r-°� �; r a } } t ,eC ,. n � � L € y uIIfl , ` it° I ix� I I I 1 I F « i r-- a , I' 3 e r .,:`- ,r 0, 1� T a. l , dA ; t t , tt el Loy I f r o I , t a r i a u ti 1� C it e /fit # it 1 f�,. 0 )) a l } F �. a ` 4 ! te N. ���tttt77 7^ - i 'Ii i i t t I^pi 3� �� j+ p �y 1} §t s: ti tt "fit t 1 `7 p 3 '�,- t oo1'•T. ci) �IIt k - q y ili 8 t 1 , % Q 111 #� y �F t 4 I f 211 1 t ,7y °"p t� ,, .7 � .. sr m......�t El A _cti. I + i t I i 11 gto m 1?. t I.. f S. 1,� .. 1. /.. il fl. I > �� } 1' t # in I ,_ t' 9 r i j 1. I �� : I 1 I t 6 :t \# i .}slx m tit P �a , tt I ( a 6t St}t 18'^..." ?t I I gT � 1 i . ' t °d ► D 2 E t S ".1/8/ i/ ii a i g) g 4 g a .2 if › '''t1 /it kti;:7.;,,\ 1 ,, ID {{.. #11 0 rt �. I I I A �� °I 4 , I ; I x@*k 0 1 o qtr tt }t ^ .� I 1` n r c ,, t * 2 t1 t� a,. Z FTt t ` i I I t I a.` . 1 f > I i�T1 co Gs ri rn + I t t r ; 1 , t4 Iti 0 ilt ..' i.., t II e 1 p N. C : 1�+ s '/ �. C'7 —G' z 1 i!1 r I. ` cif 7 t t> i'I ,§,: 1 I Q ..At . �y n# ttt w /r 4 1 1 Q Z `i std I r �� -;,1,1 j C 7 {ry R. �� 1 I I .+�� g4 t !9 g. Ga„,!. I I i « s rrre.MINN :was t. , . , ,, ,„,,..,,. e tili,o,„,,i,......, 4. 4 P77dh,C f F ettsme t:2 fet date:Apr 10,X13-07;O7:39pm CAD User swest r: ,.� a.. r t F-- 1. ##0 cx rn cS' ,e _ 't` J.t3Pl53NI7aV61 4 L. (I) -60# 1; ,t-t „tttt,,,,04; /\itt,12 ,,,,:PIO d r b 1.1.* pp j tig- 'r� i .. 82 p� t ,1 P t I �` �` / ,w ri'lliiii ?tat;.1.ii ' [ P ■��e + '1 t z , f i iral �,� f .£1'f a*' r ���. -r % ate' t t / „..„; ,-,t,-,..: a fr9;-$;71-t 4 it-,lit-tit'1,'".!'"�'+ a ate..Mfri � M g d \ 4t7� € ■ 1 '4 Z G 4,� f , t f JA 0is0 y—� d ,. E0006011 7� r ; c I Eli dwlll9 o> jj N y! ' f A > t j \ an 2 0001sto tgt a t, G7 [ ! 1 ^s 1 1 ^k ■ eerrfs t i .► �. Lt �t 4 ' i11 6 eeieidleli r 7 t i Q mz, o , P ! 1.>0 0610000>0 „ * t 3399 t „t wit+► : d y ±r" fa li }as "* Q,!■ t 1 1M+F4Nb1i�NlildaNlMil! 4 t 2 i)} ." O "ir y t t i �ii�7liI11i1N��e '-it 'qt sr1✓ t II ! t l{gb"" !"C� ,/M,. Iijii o> i© A C `11 "riM ITS t t 2 i= � $� i tt 7t I p (��yy et. S * i �®IdRR#� cif' l 4T 00006 i g i fall _ 1a�eeredir� �� t t T . t ti - iisislilln 'r '" i i t 7 76 v v i dl lei e��elebM7e t C Q �M S 7 { ,i' 7 - ' : pp t t tt saeeon0€ie�«* .4 `: -''{ i i" c°°, t 1#t r 1 ki, / i 1,ti .0 y !1l:: .1 dt � :t X e ises sr, °�. 4 prft .--'3 '''.-- „,. :* •—• .? :---": 1 I ti :ci.‘ C '%,,,. e °,1 Ta ! _ ‘ :s:\ 4 I e�8: • : $ M"' rrr �y� t t``'ires '1 E .g 4 t ��� r 1 ' ` � +sir a ti• A i. ,_ M NI ti4 TT d it 8 t ..:4 aw r a r. ' 4 --■ t �1 It i tir '‘W,y-«»�� � I CA j7i A N «. \ '� T T 1 d. T'`e.^"�>..6„, t !t t i i 1" i d 4 l 4 �e d i b J L \' \.,y ui C cx t 1 T i \ J ,, - ,,,,,;„.,:,, i', tio i, -;;, 11.,,§:„...i 2 g '., ', ',' . .4.f,N ,€IJ H f $ t HI 0. 7 t i-M 5, ^Q 3 + Y � J t.... M It r 422 , �. 7 .}S S 3 ¢ i�.. i £ lik-3.,. �� f. + ,.W x� � �tyy }ryT ', • I /4y� jj;. ' + I I R I S B F. [ ✓" �{,c1:1.; . ). 4.: }": I a 3 a iii Ft:. £ P �` t � jC7 t i .. ' d f > !'_ £ f t }� +'--.�'., 1 a°.. '� e€ ` is x # ii ! I TW -- f °4 Me i '#e e i i �m t x N 4 j�. F ..f E t :„:,,,,,,,j14;1.'1; IS •::!1:,i F t ` i \ t 4 7 ; s6 i 4 e+ yr R k 7 d Ni CS of +n '14 v 0:1. V 4.V V .-n Z c`i �' a '; t !i 1 "£ s t 1 41 m £ S i .`1"Tt '"A7' ?.t 'V A ' YA W $1` ' ' ,W'�+ _f ? ,;,! 4*y� r ' - yt,Kw' y e71 6 }. -� y I�j - 0 C1« 'ti f^ i {s 1 q ;'=� t visa yE t� jt T :' �' Yi! z "—I 1 a�L +r a ! , 1 ; i % fit 1k PT �ye/n� (-rte {"� tra {{'��.{ ((,�� 4+ it ��p ��,yg i € $ i ;F,t{ e. „ , & to ,i \:, L! ...._.y+ Sg 1 V h.} `.k "+2 S V V ` 4} ,, 4 a ,, , : �4 k ) i k4�1 �+.� A OP S@: -St YY V 09 d:4a 1V Q i i . .1. 1 i..a 5 , ! `E / 1:4/1:816^�q 49'c. Z O a E. I ' :, 1 1, 1 'O ,. Q ill . ! ! i F , , . +,.�." a 'E i i.: ii;_=v! i j- r Wt,. 4i4 M :. a [{ ; ?. i« 3:ccr c. 'I.5 :f3: a it i" ice AAAls 0 , G cr -•7-`t,44 -w -4""'t —e °t""t-a -•t. , ;;;a, 3 - A Y 3 E} +, H P F =`, Fl pant:C;1tt : \Acpu t F .C2:xlans Plot date.,Apr 10,20i3 i7:07:42pm CAD Deer:swirlier- , # F E •�.� 1101.� 4100. +� asst.. p 6A q 3 !i t 3 x (/ .4 y y'�31 C�LYl SHEET C2 2 € k 3 tt t } 4 0 1 0{-} m g y N ;;f• 8 1 — ,i_ji i.i x m fly # 3iW ja i f- t { l°k 1.oz W t ast+ca oraes as , I F '' 1 W',. -. O 9C r{ fl+ to ,p,CN N 'N C3. sD Co V 5 I a i 1 aE ' w v 111 It ill l � `L 1 ,,# �ef r 1 e s 1""fir S)t a 2 lJY IHUUUUUh` J 1 . { �I.� f P 1 A g Y , , 'I.. s e ,a G 1: m m g g a ao m m ` a -4 a^ < I ' a ° ( t I ; i F i , ii - , ) -1 -t ° IIIYYY"` rn 4if t i`P ar ff ,. ... Y "" s t a f l A �r _, to F �w �a v �rr y r ; q i Z Q t ° - �� *, '..'S Ev za Sn N '.. , t3 ur.-:€ „ n t^J} r I dd <n;.� W u is-ca c tct ce ""� , z is s g# t —( aw' a i H _ a 44 /} � 1 ,, � a sg� i ' [��R�j ^ 0 . 00 ..... . . .' .-Q 4A C:Ci C3 4 a i 8 '= i `; i L?Nf ; i1i... s F.. E t € � , qi9 A { {. i - 6 3 ..° A S 4 Q1�y :t !� . Q iI L i . 1. i s f E t !, 1-. ( 4�6 I Syl 4^SI {{ � fj € ■■ '4�.p' i3 1 i C j ,p,!gE f i ?1N g ii i `i F 3 } ,, F 4 t,,{ , ` t S el n A W. .r4 Ya. 3 a ; i i a a 'a it { 3 1s € ,i R 1',,,) i t + # {` i1{ t? P2 i fX P k 3 g i ; 1P 3 i b �1 CC (ygyy {¢gyp , , , ; ,° y}{1 1 rn� 1 il g 0 i x OS E T g t. # a I t q 1 € > Z7 rn p n 9 k I r r . .# �f+ i,, ''''...4/1/i , t ,p!U Q Q y y l t € f p i} ~ � € F{ y �j r S ilf ,...se = = 1 =, , ; = , b K i ''° 1. WF+ , je� m r 2 iiiiit.#* —.....„ 1.j thuR )y ' 0 j t P 3 t .. ... ...„,..„..; .if d d . f bay 1 ; „,... ,,....„,.....„ ,,--;_. , „, , , Jill ' '! J}+ f i 9 e t *'1 q {17V� (j .y1 d d �g t ..( £ d 3 1 1 e A (� 22 d a d e Y i# 'a t. c { �r t lif , ,;-'-' '' - :.(/* :::': ciiii ..,. L y` "' P # //' , 4{ /re d j/l♦ y ° t y v r Sr rt 8. 4'.3 it a/ / 6 g2 ; 5£ S s d r , ft Yf4 T F�G4 y l i ,R 1.,',1 a z _ Y` S +� C 3 is pd Si,,.�tr �" ,»„„ i '�—t �' t 8(7 I f 'F t 1. i�.'T ar / .1: 1 "4 J(}N�+�ice. : d N{ { f lll i p •i� :Irt.a �fRSy� �Y i!IV i 4 € d p�/{tq'F, �r s g r T•Y7- t d x f = f r tt`g I e i P f�! a {/a g t r g ?""Z f{ 1R j d A-. J 5� �� +/t.. M i t Z "\ fil P 3 ;Pk o ' Spy V 1 a+. 1 VR GyjY f jqp ?i F d: j p ;t # 4}i ✓ r i e I /¢�Ff. tr.r es° b ixi rr A fr yi1 .jf i e, Ii i '� df t w� �3rts` r - ;3 x 1 £) a xi 0�j ) s j r 1 —1 }g 3 ', b, i ��ti t� + n F t i.y$�5 "S (F f■' le 1j� ;°h. t + S `4A q .!fix j 'l .f F ,, y , �a Patti;ciuseratawattapapacsataltasatttamatAapa _t Fk .C? Ptot date:Apr 10.2Ot3-U7:07:45pm CAD User, r, , i ., I ,, ,, ::, ,, ,,,c,i, . 71'. i m ii 10 / i n'�s .a'+ ' s` w t�'» ` a a's '., ,( ' ` r ', 4� ■ Kg �o , u to (4:,w c+ a --- ,29-1.181.-a :' HPtE SNE 4'2.3 r i. n i� tR 4 t + 0 .. i u! ! IU !IUh1 y +R.+ 4D.�r. # a J e .r rr �. .s .i t «s � .> ,.s .r t`� ax 1°°!1 Ij '„, \ ,,. ,,-„N % . ,g g = i A; 1 ,. v %rr ", 1 = c„. tf : , ' 11 I i '�y.yy [ �h y t a i F fi iil 1 s E 49. °yC`!fit bF si Y, j Y S jf l , �4 e C s N rn ;+1 � p} v ro w "*} � � h{y�^�i � � \ r1��`R !P ' �p 'p Q g : : i9 4'. 0 C O :yr G? '��«" *� .. # t i 4t hx \,. I e , 'F � r i. I ili �� P @K j $ i f i Y t Fv5 tom , ,,,� 1 l- [ 4Fe lFS, a d E d i6 a I .{ t "+ 1 FP } I t t - re 9 1; f f�� il II '., 11� 111 ft ii'C3 r;A W N ,a Uf°I I. 1. r .f� {+' — �F x _ .�.at s �5 iJ i } i , t!f :i27• tY3 .. s. "s! "'^". E B f W i• 3 x , �r iF3 !) c d P b ��(�ry}]�' ;. i 9 ♦5 '`‘' r'BV ., P I C r as F�OV ubi A { I � i :i } # la d 3 FFt'0 F Y x4 t( a'. £ i T i.Q P x I G 64 }44Vy �Ci d#F i FP p + "`; x . 2. c 1 4� #: 'ft p '{F 'wY ym� a a E a a aE T7 x' ' y 1 t.\,,,,, , I,, ..- �,y � E. 3 f9 (rjj M >: 8+ f i x j t iA` @ j bE :I orn yp�� G� ■ i p V E. C E 5 i C B i a p �s; a j}1 I ` [s..i b a ■' Sli E AC f t 4,,'y1', t t i 11 t t j/d' k s d F a fFj [y ay �}d j ■ Ii 4 j 3 I [�yf *'1 ;I T i Y3 +R7 z. [ t 4 3 j' I I i" 1 E " t�F PI 2, �J k 14( }#ft fi � j # ! W fa a r.. i at ,°g Jr,' i U(.! X c) # i k x 9 q # s ::e 1 f 6 ,l . t A o F t F i , f r dF 171 t ! �E} ° Y a } dge J 1 i �1 ifN .1 C�� b IP4di E'�..».�....! 4 d w } tr {t, P .e, co „I4 pf e !z I tc ,/i e F Ji I 0 I P t. a c3 ; Y -� #a . B d I g. l Y dia"}�°jA> 1 k , b Y JZ. d 4, Ji� t N E J d t ad Z t I lo I i i a i ' i + #F y fi.-g d fr ( �} � t P � ad; B } t F tMla ' M •u). �m '4�`0a w as,g t � 3 J . J, 4 > j s 1 �J t 1 t !V 1 ♦ tv f n s if a ' # f� I R {iJa } 2i ~f tt ( } � r y a r J r{ �- .467 a} ; P � d � si s N d ' tL 0 z F i _:4,...,12 1 j a „rp°s.j �r^"-{ s'M. [�y 4/ !qtZ C tdJkt aV© '� a J b x a J s J ��• "s i r ( s # 1 '4 P1 €1 g i 1 y I% ` I 1 y a J PIAT iLIPESHEETC2, , -a i e M y z —;--/?- t r : � s . il : Path;c. 9 F1100804:C2'/C-1:448 F#ot :Apt 10'2°1341"7:44"CAD ii„,„'„; , _, . t , ,v 5 I , . ,,,..,„...,,„ 5 II i II 'i 1 l t f LO. , 4 t 9 c W '3:. fr,_ --e-3$1' {{gy�pS �,g ((��y ,p. {aw. ,.pp ` tg i i. {(} ! l s i 11s. """". Lam' 0 to t++ N ti S? V ..C# #� i.� 5 + a 5.. t 1 5 q./? } F �'! � i r 4 t r'i {Y tw ta.yt tx C,a 4r u e �,,cS ., i I ° ia� z � r ta obi_ ot root '*S +3 _. ' 'a a ;.t �' , uuugfl ✓ ,r» , t i �P #_ti�ry� 5tt t_ 3 tp IU ICS a i 0 [ §�S _k «-e,._.......w iS 9 i \ t k 4 3 tip } t Mt 0 {t� Cry �a �a -.1 .r. # Y I. e ls;. 1' f yt,.�t W z.:*, YO t t 4 ` 5 Y t $ 1 4 .. pmm Y*.y .N im ► ' t . �. a 1.: 5 t Y ( ,a $ t.,..""*'4 i R . a t t Y{ k i i' rf (If t R /"'CS r i .>`.. k i �In 9�} t t \. f E 1,;. , :'I 3 8 \1.41'. P. aT3 °' NwaiPt'-" naf�' +t z tri , , I f fE'Y., + c, ep P O <A V V V <7 to, -;C. p 3' .p �,,. + s 5 , I �f. 4 ]1. C x t 1 $7°`4.• f ► t ' t 4 ' v i t £ '--",,.1 w Y t pi t S A+'„.4, tai•CA �+ y sm ga v ps t ��gqy — a a CS O +3'C t x :,p 0. t7 rJ G Y }�y.�. # \ % '\ a =i.+: 4 d OY'# 1 ! k k. f ,f �'"t, 4 yam, it 3,k4 .iti) p. , , a i9 t jt 4 4 f 5 iY { `. `' �` ° \ 1. t \. ti ski . S � 43Y 4 j £, .V.,, +i -, i a il. -Ig..,„„,,. m -,,,,,, . ,,s „,, :t.s,„;„. ...„1. , ,, gii ( ,, i : , , '''' _ ., 7 '71 Ai—lg H ...d.r ij. ,:d r 3 Ft.> m p Z FF 2 cS 0 / § F Pf og 33 S A - .1! I, FR z ,,...\ 1 el tl,,,,,,....,j_____,../ i ....'- ' ' 5 m in —4 a, I 20 Z ra j g 1. 1 Y 7''k''3 t '' 5}It ' i 1 4 i IT a e.+p s y k01,A t y, a , f .1. tF t a �a a F�' ` xYt e -4*, g5a. i+-,,¢' +�. i 1 4 5 1 # i i5 f R 1 §, t , f ,1c 5 E, 4,{\ 5 g $; i ff fir. t} , }eil a 3 f 5 4M1'y p Y} s d' x a i� t\g. s Si £ J i 54 h $ 'a '4 \ y i i i• i ;',1, Fi ;t �n4w t a �:. t •e 4 pi . I-111). (IL Vl ii 45�O-1 (� sJ��C i ; -s(((���C j"` q 73 t41 f F a"" x rf rBXpt ' ° 5 y�� a t; 4 4 #$'i4 a T1 (�' j 1 f i s a 3 t 1 r i zf. X" ! "'# [q y t a1 ?'~ ' a ° e r+ g t S N if OZ c S . E ltl f V Z xl m m § + WW `"' �"/ : try`' _`'°+. Y\ 'i } E d ;n Np„.i 1-:'° +i k*sY w€ '�3. » _ z 4 d :.t5 i; "� .;t.#pp i° ;,5''ac ;O' /�yry�, I>SS , 111 CI i I t va t r• ,,.., , A . „. d', '''',. / i ,. .y"{fk A 4 t7 t7§ i ; f{ P -1 1 !lltttiii { t 1 c ). 5 g SS 555 o 0 '71 1 f • ° t i a ;1. IV tin t t 7 !g `i ',N.',§4 d ; 3t i i+ I ! 9 4 .I f E `e i t5M+ a LLL z 3 5*t}t i 1 r9, 4#bi H. { ,3 S1 t 6 Path:C.liioata Mern-"4444ti 1 Filename:C2;x mac Apr 14,2413-07:O7:S1ptt CAD r ` t i ` t a • ` ( i yya. 1, to w °_‘ �� N Y L 0 �. As 1 �k '�`., 13. 3Ar�Ffy ,,{ tM} �y S �'j �Iidi� `' t 2 1 1 v' i ;:'- . � ,`t" ". � .:% t t 1 N.:-..r.„_,,- 0 ! to 1 < ! � t t N,„ e i t I t ( f I i l' r• I , t \ ti a _ .,. S e i rrt - "1D` '`^-- w +r. -'- . ___""'.,,. �$ , t\' 11 t. LI t. w \ i" i / `` /,1 X i k' ". f, tk .'t ,‘‘X\ �"„ `, 1 '"1' ,.ti' "" m I *,:I t 1 t�7 S' I t , 1' , Q I '`� 7 I '� y 1 I f N ,�_ e I i� vt I I 1 °` '''"` N..yyrr 1 51 ', t t \ B1 . +" °hut rw > I t'^r,..�-�) t Y �t 8,�.. p I t, W 4�/ LLL��7 t�! �i 4 d t yy ,.« i t4 ; g „1‘ " I 4 1 t° I �3a t,w ¢ 1, 1 I 2,,,,t, 1 I —141 - iii a , el ....„ i., e '''''''‘, I I '''‘.,,t. \ d 4 t 1.' 1/ r 2. 1 i I 2 , I „t ,.,, ca i vt I G .4tt 0,4 . t �II e Q., N K. k. m i' i 1 ' \II PI\ \\ I ! 1 't' �. ta: t .,ten 4, \ i\ man .{ e \ 41 f �.,\\ \\ t\ fi M ..... 1 t \ a, N. 2° 1 n 2 , g t4 L 15 OzAM {V,� rp lid .....», t} t A I i a \ t i 9 j I I 1 t 9 '^^� 4 3,.... d` q' ..---:N, } t 1\ a`'. t1...:,„ m� y� � t t1t S ‘ii. .a/,,, " } l , jr,'� * .- .t1 2\ �, \ t �I 1 %� yy$yv , t ( 2 ii /y�� F A i ' t 1 1 e5! ! F x g I g I t ~ /lfiiS �� i� ..'.�.I '{'lI t1 I\ a 1 t} pry ` t i 1 t I I r j t t 4 K r t 1 I d x \ a iQ ♦ t n, (figt w II77 , ��1 r C7 .°`x 5�° �, '�' 1114t-i.::::17".....-1.......t::t.,.., CO/may ry [•l� .�- Jf tt q t r y i�. ii K G �� " ticz *C- x in _ el z A ©A ! o r zrm r k i I g ? a �' W I i 4.C,f} Q W i - > Z o cn C..... 1 q g i ° N > 0 rn . I Pavi G It pugcP _8 me:03:)l„ Plat tlsIIITI Mar 28,2013-12~.58:39pm CAD Use • ELEVxnct ill•W 1 il 14 N t ' 8- 1 A . A ELEVATION " .� .� qq 0 ' M • _ °° i, i� (Dafj \ 1.-: I F ,, , ..v I ' , �tg .,_i:,,� ( �� I _ - I`■ r m 0 I , ,.. �' I �� J e << ' +:, 0 .t... ,,,, (,,, CI)0 0 0 " gl■ . '''''111, 1,!,' iii °. pSP I •, ( C Ism' _ �� ELEVATICAI Z i N b.ELEVATION o 0 t l d r ' y I { 2 Q � r :a S #- �,� 0 ;t 13 \ , 1 F a ° :', ,'"1,, 1-,..1,'1-.IPI 1 , ; i„,,,...5. ,,,,,,,, ,, , . Ii i u, E=z 11 i' 1 Iy ji i ..! - ' I,, ,, _ .":„',1; ,. (1) ''' ,',::!,,_,,,,,,i 1: ,:,..,__:=::1. ,''',:111;',.! ,1 , , iYl ao r,-;:..9,.',:t,', ,, ,,,,,,,',,,,,,,' Ili]' 'i.,,,,,,,!,,',, -' , if 3 / � 4 rrr E m m $ , -j'il , , ..,,," , t .i i f ,` " ° " r tttl 0 2; 'm', �o 3 z r = � 11 F° r C :Z om g S I°F t c F { a t -- I I , a.`, i to a i.,.--I co i _3 c -'r 3 P cz + - , �e z 2 L., : ot Path:C. wittterla to IUwnpiAcPu B Fi :CS.a.„e,ections Piot date:Max 28,2013-42:58:44pat CAD e sttenter. ELEYA1ted C"-" 11 0 , _,s3 aP #1. ij g, I ., .. .� 4 21 f 1 Tk < i Fr ti 4, 1 41'20 CCCCCC4 - a at F, A41t7N t'1.EVATtOi�t i(.14 0 Bfi a 0— to ii» a to C KA Y. I Ct II J jl ocsA 1 Fm (161 DI II )'!,..,' Na i 8 1,1 el ' it ! �y7 ii P 111111 IiIi , - _ a C / ,.„,„ t I I ED ' ',. .. m..,. g q , , 1 2�'iffy _ 2 I 0 a g E' l l' jj I [ 1. o 4,18 n it EIEVA kt 1 1 C'. t ' 4 1. 0 0 0 0 i5 i \ 118: st i e� j, + , . ■ A 0 3` r- xyFiASEttNE Iw 1 3 4-_._t 1' ni v -� I mcn .. d 73 X I z m { 0 = = q I 1 i 1 4�m - - ilig, F 4`,-f Z Z ati ' P / �w. o J 1 t I 6, 0 t 0 Path:C. Yli Paa6 V FH@91 .L3Jc Pot ,2013`12 58 4T9pm CAD User:sw'oter, •IL, 1 J ill'� I EIEVATIM 1 A �kp o ur :c; to VI 0 VI 0 iIi � � m. t ° c 4 1 p t ► a I el—( RY i i I Ltt d"` co E, I M f.4 0 ,„,,P �, a �, I 1 � r . - : , , , , — ;..1 ,i , / s. " ,_i',:d.,,.,; _ :“:,,:.._ :_.,1 It A C3 l' 0� 1 * _,1.4. , „.i. :ts.),,:m35,, A;* eV. r--------- ,' , ■ 1.— C—r!—-1—'''''T' �` �L 1. 4 5 A 0 a i o- 4. r Q 1 0 I r , , 1.8 ,, 1 , , . ,,,,..,_,_. , .. .. _ , , ... ,..,..,_,....,,,,,(((voirwe .., f,,I.;._,,,\,,,,,,,,014114104 ::: i 1. X ,X m 1 1 ELEVATION E,tWVA IION P f� Q 0 + I 1, ' Q p s C? 4} P3[_. \ ► . _ `, 8. n . ca 8 i , ; i +p ,, 1 : l'' .. , 1 .0, :i z 0 [ . Z ill-- I . e 0 / 1 _: P4 1 0 I < =; ,� ,� 0 xi 1 i al a m 1 I N , . EI-EVATION 'Iillillii'gil • Path'LIAPROJECTSASEAVNATER RESOURCE02011Pt88k4a8211186-MaYnald...880ealinelak_PmPhlea...08MddadMACAO*0-Parcent‘O.Pkarauda:Dtx-DETAILS Pk:4date:artar28,2013,01:0810prry CAD User swinter. g S 1.1X 2X 4 8 g# 1 avAron P P P P 0 1g 4 ; si s 1 4 i 10 ! , Igi t 1 , \ L I CA 0 a 4 41 S \ 101 R .,. S ,..,, or 't7,41.1, P ..,:).4*,2: .0,228,242 g M ,,-4 1411 g ' 1; 1 1 I ,:. . 1 / IN i I . to 11 I 1 t \ lilf: * 1g i ,-, ; N, '‘, '12 otil . . 4 ',.t.!..,1,:t \ a i s , . g i .v....7, \ / aU si -,C s 4 f°' 7.4•A• "2 ...._........... , ?g \ A ■2 8 4/ //i g'•*--6---g--4.--, _ „. ... a. 4 , x II ' 4'". la 1 Fiti,}0:74.1?" , . MI.C C III':, i;:2:$l x; x.' 4lit 1 _ * ,,,. ,..t.?4,,r. . 1 °- C) 4 W f 2 2 4 1 .4-1 8 6 g z 44c...?4, 2 4 .m 1 411 R " g 1 2 512!. .... c' - 111 Illgt & 1 A 51 M#/#1 1 1 51 4 # li 1 H _.1: 1i;. i x IP la.i 65Z i ."; i grl I 1 1 ...4 11111 fIF pg is.g. 3 3. g ) I : ,,,,,,— 8 ., ... t s 0 4 _ 1 0 0 -4 4 0 o g al Al lxx Ixf of *X 1 X 11 .,11 1 : tlig if :; li 1. 1 . 1 iv 111 xl 14 1114 iP-I nal: il!'''pl ..4 I!:!I .i,1 d 3;P4.,4.);.. 111111 1 g aEVATIC.: * ° PI T. 8 1. .1g• k la .;.1 i: ii: : :* 1;1 i 1 ; ig -1 , 1 & $1 1 . 2.r- , 1—: __ /0 1111111 1 4 4 - .4 0 0 0 0 0 I 2. _49 i 9 0 g 01?,.. 1 cp. .s z ,. p, ...I W ; 1 T 4. '*---- Ili ii i . 11, . s. ,.; i x — I - x . . 1 . Is ig 1 Xi 1 I S ip ; 1/ . tY il 1 I , A J 43 , , . 0 ( 1 i li p i in m 12, 1 ti A . it. PI x Ifi I ", (e) 4 D , I, i .... I 11 r; 1 i s el. r II 8 -1 4 4 , ; ,..4.> n tel(4(,111191.4119, ', b ) ,1 - -,..---,.. I , 4. . .! - '15'14rS1**illog ' 1 ,2 Ix 4 Ye ,..A , . -44 '''' 1 1 r Iiii w .,.. Aa1 g . 9 . 1 1$ 1 a 1 1 „..... ,,'I -1 - ......' i li 1 § 4 1 g g 4 3 ;' 1 t 1 Jo i gM 3 0 ° , " :‘':f / im. t8 ,,,. 84 q I st 1 8 X w g ,..• , i 1.4. 1 w - / v. 1 a i i i s-,, ' Ag illti X P.• 411! 11!4/ 4 0 W 8 8 a -* ::. 4Er !filittirali,„„...4... .. ,.„ -4 0 4100 n -4 = 0 o :-... ____, o to A t 1 ,.., ...n z 14 q 4#1' 2.P1 0 4 m 1 .4 ... , . - ... ..1. . it ..,. .. . lot ..., ,,,,,,,...... ,.... . gri lip (;) 5 go ‘lke 4110111111 411‘\ 461 ,... i rn 03 '"n rol z -4 ilS PI 'lir In 11/ 1 i Itiie s 1 4 R.17 T c, ... a B cti4 4 ifre",4) 2 ffl z ...t 2.. , 0 1 i-1 i'l C in ---1 q 1 -11 z 0 4444g 0 Pi leg"' (.,-) m 4. 'X p 1 6. .4 8 2i z o 0 *0 C-7 it • t. p, , t 2g .8 V,v ,.., z4 11/46111r1111111116-1A11110 4, li !I. i -4 ref g ?il LI Ord h'4 ba 1 0 i _I 2 0 --f >, M 111 gt.0.2 5 .--I 141•6,K100 G) Z ,„ $ is' I, 12.1 CJ s33 p Z 0 < . C.- rri y. C 0 a P A 30 71. fg. g pi m 20a R44.-1.—......._.,,..m......1 IN; R Z rn A A. z g .....< . < F- 2 r-, . a r Iy fo AM r 0 m O n m 1 p• l m z ��...{ S 1 m N '- cn 0 Z oz(f) 1-t a'Z � X rn rn iii +k z H' O w 0 O- � V/*s � n`= K + 0 �^•, .#fit ', "'O ta, �l p F a m" W''.,- _,' 7:'.---ty ,,--- //./:4;0.., -:at- -=...to,I. r,,,-,,Aifv.:1,-,:ci... ;:J "7 7:3 Ill t n£ ' D W k �'��m �'� . , mmimil I-1-1 X x � r 't aarw e . .mil i.,,,..,..,512._ ,.,....,..,...„,. .,.: -.1....;.;.;;,..L,.:4,;u,,,,,,,, ,t;4.., y,L....,„4 ;..., „„,::.7‘..,.,..,:...,.,,..,,,,h,..,..„,:.,:titi..;.„,L._, cn 0 cD IMO m U1 A W N O O co v O CT A co N —a Z C Cf co 0 m r D O � ci� � � � Z D (D , (,...) m r cnz co mO E a `-r � Z � � mm -a COGZ) ( :,A 0 o o cn Z D 2 D C z O Z — Z —1 mcOW › DD> czZOZOOO =� C v j 90 m=1 90cn —Dio° XN � -ImcnO0X � m _ fD Ili < ). --1 5 D %17 C• mn m co—NC c O z Z xi mD D n i.'. `m o O z O• Z � cnZ0 Z Ti v m n ° ° O A • m NORTH OLYMPIC o x m TITLE (III) CAE/ 'I[�/70 ° .4011(:‘.e� ENTR/X SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT � .k' �? �y sEarnE N ° $• o aJ 11; 200 FIRSTAVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 .1i L�x SEATTLE.vi/A,98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON S A IL M O N TEL(205)2890104 FAx.:(2os�2ss�OSs COAL 1710 N www.c rdnoent xaom a N > R, N O N 00 V m) Ut A W N mxn g.T�6.Tmi O m A m m i O 0 m m D 2 11 .' 23 0 0 0 m m 0 3mn 2 r11,81'1' 3 z z m O D 3-i 1 217;3011 D„m m oc C Z„C D 23 O 1 D➢1 m o o n -1 N o o m H o D bm O A— O 0 23 „3m„(mOZ23QON cmm n, mzc> OmODm DDm mmm2�m Doom 03c 225,T, n, F023zUDDNOmz„m no ( o oHm-10x„r 0 r03m m zmm A„D_I-- M-DZ m: NA➢Z OA r c0 m 000 1-z_i x06 C0 z 0 ImTI m0 ,'�i7 mm0 O z C 0 O ,-° -I- -I M m 3 0 Ar m q O S�mDm A� ,�4 LOirN�23- -,, ozoom Zr� m m o 1K mmZ m:cz SoCAdi m', omz Do.ZI 'nZ mmj V W UI A Co N Z '`rn" "2. - t,� I I cn –IVCncncntncnv�cm " $' �� 0– mmmmmXm –ICn 0 x �mmxmpmmmmmpcn � 7c - xDNmxxv>xx �0--II 3a o D �nnmmxmmnzj Z\ ..:f o )c I r n�p�mmmmm �al� �� -I 0 N IP# m Op �l�i» �–IID– WC� ° 1c I _ m WO * 71mcn -4 rnTTrr � 5:.. = 3r ,0 x O ZZ��O i0����� �t d'4 _Q. I ( I � � -1cI) I DEOOZ � ;0 { -73,_EppOCOimxx - .t -�� ` N N ti 'Al m o 0 r2 n Z O N m m � , czi czs czi czi czi czi czi czi o m b::� C co co O 0, * 't O �rOZ 'nCC�Z�Z� _ p `" m y z Ca —10000 r • o i in) z pm-9 rXI —IZN W p • o o z z m r->M m m z x1 D�0 E o _7_'^_� Z m m m 4) �» Z D r 3 Z N rn Z m Z1 t _ +.., '�»a= . . I, -K----r."1.1_ , m z , �_ c Z C - - - u I m z zv m v z o? x 6 ✓ c0 O m _ c I— r y '`t cmn o � i ' / 2^.. x Z zq t '8 _ +.G( n R X rn ._ Lf i / E O u _ .- t� rn o m v ` f'f .,.' w co to m w f° C7 - �T' _ x O / /// �� - g f s O ^Q o= �! Z r o A �- /a . o' -'N \ [I 14,1 awo m m v N p Fl A M.„ .i 1 /� w S N r ���'N n° o O ! imz i ' CO '-o o ',-_, \. -47 S ��" I Zo WI co D p 9. F w. (( �' 'yam O A V 'a"� f //[` !I—., .. t Y. A'' ./ 2 TIP co p / m _ �n m / gQ, =.'.6 'm�a"i iii! .. p ' Te C �y C �, mm D7 111 ` : z U s c oo'a ` s O i` f-' - p-1-• oo y��� y g — �� r 7.60\` -m -- t Q 1 u7 h o '»: »'d � `�Z f(1/ '. a0 '', y= C It MI a " r i* (A (n �� � m �_ f >7 _1I> m co _Al • '',..,1- , .,dry r C l' yt' o 17 + tf.fih '4 1 c Fr .' ,� t y a �\ ' w 171 \n it -` „ � \ — _ M zo 3 –___. � ,'. m1-i1 Arm. !,�. /+C�'y Mn+, - - ' - l Z O N;r £"2t o ? 5 of x- *00 k r -' `;:,` O Z - x - .. _ y 'i7Cf _ rr .. ,�1 .. 2::i 1 ,r,;-1 �' IM t, 1 F QG ..tiAk a _■ j �� $ i r \r� i x �1 @`�c s-- - - ;r f ,L' - `� \\ '°�..!�`-,8 `;`wp#(i '. .,_ e - `„ _.Y` •"• a �a vn l 4- --, `-� ,,' \ e?,,s,--‘,'.- ''4 "�rny�1v -,4,-k,..-,,,,,,,,4,20, ;`` s _.. _cc t h x�! m�i ro i�m° Ir. tr .+''a, ./' y?�' »\. ,a' 'k:.� s%1." - o.. y' ._ 'fit` r % '� „, .. ",rrr f'I #' :• .w„µ m 2 z O A m ti z a ,t _ '-iSc�yy,, - yy o o o �O m z;, m rn +, s .Y WA y� z m c O m z O r ''. .�, �. .� b *_ " r,� ,- - „ S : - /'j+Y/V m z .. :: RI M K '• ' Yi. . A� ; p � , r x_. l�� � G ' } 0 ..:, lt'A ''zh ry a ,_ '-1,. \ �,t,t '' , D m 4 4C k'f :.rry». _ ,O , '" f1' 'h1Y .aC+ oo 1f3G 3S si d Iff ` ' 2 �. '•S, ;41.,GI S,Q2 1d,"rc t " m D ,1 T-':•-�� 4'44 �. : �- o� )(f• i �'re� �� fit. +( ? - 1: ,7925 - $ t _ l'4, ;CA y,G K �` y�_ ., G,, • m G�C. .. �.,L _ as ,r '� '• � ` r:,' �p w 4 i m O a: * !: k '/ re 4A, a ' ° , z n '�,, -i.:'a 4`.';.s t. T '-Pm A l• b, ` } s 7 ;; x - y, 3t a �vh u: e i -,:,,-;,:-'4", k '� { t - • �' �..,_ iaa w t ''i th x :,.,..; ,r.• ifs:. F t - Lt r.' - ?m J - Lti m ▪ m -ob N NORTH OLYMPIC _�+� r ,<A z A INDEX 4.& CI) Carcirscr ' 0 Z < < d G.) a 4 ENTR/X SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT f(:,," '`', t} sEArnE 9 `n • x °m o '� y is 2IXJ FIRST AVENUEWEST,SUITE 500 ""�� SEATTLE,WA 98119 a JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON TEL(206)269-0104 FAX'(206)269-0098 COALITION �" www.cardnoenMxcom ? P N 7' Z ' r - vWVmcnzc�r S S X m 0 0 0 D m z y cn ' Op0(n1yZ0F220r ' :\:: _\ — r 1 I I o mOV�9�IpiZDT ' I m wmzx_-0*09,=, �F ; ' I x ° <._ !cn � vmx ��c)mOD� o - h Y � m���DpZCNi> vc _ \ ( l'''' v y O5ODmn*�W c)1 � • C4 A s A m y 0 o -, -, o, o, m -1 v_ .1 m o m z 03 0Dnm OG� r '; v v m N r Z —t(� I�TI t m m czi 0 czi czi cz, 5 = A 0 czi 0 z � O m D � v O� C7 n - ° ° m o m * " x { m m-q c OMM AO0W0 D ? d 3 cD v o z m o c=i c Z ' ° x x m o m 1 - m v.[rD-y r t o �" A ° z = D ° czi , 2 0 _ , .F. co .":,y Fy _ _ '�„r, D A m m m D o m n -<r D g-0 % - ) �'T`-.`?,7-�`-,F o ^' z m al DcDi � OHO �y \ / g m x cc M0 I > DD O< y" .`. ? — �— cn0 Zxzv 2m _,, yC / . tF 0 0„ � - ' « 7-� , — w .,r* a""Vri).,/, > ... j.,______„.....: ---":,,, '•:' --ar fl-, i'l .•, .fr,„., I, ' . -1 •"- / I„ :,r.,,-, t-- %' ,�,.. � R�GATE �. iiiiiii MI r ' / ', ox,, ,,, , , .0, ,. pO \ _ - r k \`hO ,' ,,, /' 2:4„,„• c` liti ', ,, ^ VCS�/ tf, 1 /..,.. , ,, , , ,., . ,, - , . i + �- — 1 �z i , \ ..._ yi/a� k�i rf 1. ti,.� aM .: 3 .� "' AJ 120/7 Nth x , o ),, , , ,,,, , ,,, , / 7 4 // :i ,/ •A' ]IZ ro I - .. may_. ..Y 1 �t m F y 6 S k! 1!H; / \` �l/� h7 \,`'''' /jf to SI ti 17t �r : x o°o • r—. exl i �� d wy' �� m A P >> 0 ma, * �� S p RJ ` R T E 1 II r p `� tit y,' 3 .4, n'x z ,i C-, {_ ` .t. („ r� t ?� •£ti,t '.,F .. '✓�de„`S 'kR 'v:. O G1 -'n O �y '.tiri: � __-' s,.4a / ffi \'. z m 2 2 a •m m ti r i; Y ,f.• m-- '�+ Z m rty •,�; r+.' - fY 4'y e$f .may x ^ v .! "...•:...) _. 5 � ,'.. . / 4?• (n'�' FEE ;.., i •5: {5„ s.. rry G -:•T t O me .A S� -' ' ,,,,, 'Th ::/ __ < m m - S Z Y� -.. Yg rtri : if .,.' I, tg 4. ✓,� ^'T t .y gyy; y g 2 yj Lp, ! s : '' .: �t 'V/ ,�$ t•�) ,,<ty K�. 7 ,,x C O O fn�J- 5h - .4„,, y, R '5..! N '� ,ate 2 '. L�n a. F'” '' ' rF. " t k �'.tw a Fy ''X,( - • ��- ?a L '� '� tea"" a - • - -, - f��� `; " ' ,�4, • 4� ' ' •.` 'i''' r1., 8 i'? b '^ �. Win' r ;,�., t '�{ ,. �. i « ;• c .ht v� r , ry, .t' 114: ��'. +vn a _ - �� �'a'4t i p � �r r ._ r I. ,,, 1.6 ,, t v v ^ C) ° ° ° NORTH OLYMPIf a.:�^ 1 z X o 2 m m STAGING AND ACCESS PLAN __,,_ ‘ieri) CarcIn o .p ENTRIX 3 NOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT x r 'f''`�'J ® SEATTLE "' o x °m n, ,4'�f -� 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 `�% a s SEATTLE,WA 98119 SALMON TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX.'(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON a w.card���� COALITION VI' J V ry —.p O r p "0 W>O OOD� mzDW ,�. " I x o Zv O O O p I NI i ImCO— ç O ��c�mO�m r �s �' p T.mOCnMZO{ C, I I ! rZ T, C >5O-i co C -- F ' ,P .yam �[ m ��nc 0 v_i m ��nc X (� 3 o m m m m v w )` co '�2 X � °R'aY'Y' sJ N N 2 N 41 fn co �n _O fn 41 N N O M (�m –I �" •' - Z Z A Z Z Z z x Z Z A z -, W Z 10 m c m o m 47 c G o G o O 0 C7 - C'''C i n m x < '31 Z TI.� 1 0 r '_.. p y 'N" m a z A 3 o o c or r D r m O z = D n O =r C ��� = m m T V `" y m ° Z a o {r m _I ,i' .--fir = I-- m Z ,' g o 0 g• O W y r p *k - z y n O m Zl m g 1 z, nk,7 5 <, - ' ,+ m m v Z H mto my r m xI z r _m ,1 �_- I,: - „i++t v ..Z y��"41, X yjl�Yrn __ l Y 'VY4' it (, .,�_,asioli ' i TO NOSC � ., Tj' ?� i ES,Xi' „,,,,,,,'":-,,,,,,3.', I.t�-.:.• ENTRY GATE .. c ! f x / / i / �� "°” / h 1,J,t /j -,- Nr LL _ '� o � / � �r: ��V �� I " ���/ o A off_ ' ,,,- ',..,■‘' / I 1- d.; g 71 . +' i�' �-� � g X - / ,.,.�� w,xP -'--- .. v.t"K -- � 1.' G L t ` y " s:' / f/ �`,r.,'. x ,, {{y'] m \its . .. , F74 f:.a ,... / Nj f, �� C yr �, "f�. - m� 71 nn -,/ -,:://4„/ ;v / o z m t m I/// //�yy (!AT / ,;�'" �,�� !-„,ay .ol o rn' fP 1...1 !' I f _ x m r m 11 •� , etc\ ' m g °� cE/ ` r Cmfa U) m X r ak Ltm o " ,\-, i m �' f ill \ 22 Q Z V } A{ / - — ....'eT,I) .`( ' , - - - ., .•+pro, - _ L yy�,t`°a �z a l� - - y , ..s n:° 1 1 \- r ,E; - �.r� -.fir t = {_ z .n-. ,:),..'''\'''\'‘k • ,. � �. . . .,�.m' x A'x' ; :` •ig \' 1' '!” yk Kw i.x n - y" � � �y � y ' .v, ' ., � 2 '" t F y • ,-r k , . , .,fit ` r - �., -wary,, ,t' ? ,, ,s G t i!!66 G � w�q �r m M {, W„ - r i r '`e -.J * *-fit j.�'&. \_ ''�r - �. � � � Y #' li S A S 1 1 . 4N' ry„' ,y ` w 'E _ - Y"yx,. 4> j fit -• kr ff tt .� s :'4 o f >i ~' t t �. f- a ; , �'T- r'fi”„, �ri r ° ° M ;„-:.,-.::::.,,,,; C !t ' u .4,"�, y .. : +' ".t:.a t y ;, i. wm s r x e • , .• m o v v ° NORTH OLYMPIC m k 2g o , o m TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN ��.- Z �� Cario/no { — , 1 .�� ENTRIX SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT ' ' 5.%f . r SEATTLE 8 it x ° o el _ 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 � y' SEATTLE,WA 98119 ° m m ° w TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON \ COALITION �; www.carsinoentrixcom J z . f m n v �m �0�= aL •e. 71M0ZD m mzpD O 1cn Z FPM" zrnZincvw, �v� o•• , -micmm �55 a �Z > ' Ayv �X�� / g Dnc�� m n i T. m 1 DW v 0Z< m $ �� / - � DmmDm0 z §, 9 y�rm m » / �� mm�O�np �" �/ — ��zDm ro 4"�! it 73 m> O01 ��v�!/� \ 3 mvpzcn m�c�nzpzo oo / r DM• M o oc f , 1 i / ' �zD mmrn� �� t ��'- -`-V vxcml �a�� -- � D� r�Z�D �� �. D-I °-°mom / : \• zOm me °��� i �,n-n--�., / w mmzm `., ___ _ 1 vzn�t�i�mro i 4 .� . mmp-i i i ' / ��- co rnDD1D R �' ? j frnva3 D � Zmrm A Jt� NMv 1 ,, `, z oDvxr i 0, \ xiG�' zrrr7 ? m , i m1Dm-i ti� ! s al z xznm ,r': '' mmD co� mvm �,LL it �z �pm � Dr-1-1 mil S s n % nT�Zm 4 : �z t A 1—>> x0 7_ 1 p�mrry Kam. s ri < m ,,,,N 1 n,,co m .;1 k`y, CO CO 1 .. .fir,,,. EmK.-< +i --1�'."'fit D cnv \ m < 0ozm Dvr r .w w_ .� n�D DD O C7 v - A _ Mrura .' p\;:;';.. \\ �, v.. Z fil Q {. u_�:r, t?��,• -.'� «""" "� ppr� �� ` / zv 4 4 Ft.0*-,: mm li'12°`4 , \ ,� \� .w ��� Wyr p _ \. " j,�, n \"•" x:c4 {�D. /„y"` ,, a M rn �J D C Z Z-1 }'- ';.o x�,: 2:b;c:: ` ZI N Z zzDcmn �� e }. O D ommm 01 2 Q r,. ,* 3� i," i k ., ,,. -.i - T.v (n t--..,-.,e,:7,, bc- fi.d a .,D D— m �� rp m° Dp ¢t. "^ s I \+v^n Co a7 W D f 1 4 r,, X„' * ,£ a ta Tmmpmme S '�j . zm1W y, n#. v „ z .N #v r : z; G> 2 cn '' 41,- .4,.. r�r — c "#fin 7 +� .�: F --- 2 C .,� , -. 2D0ODm .Ve+ sr,. t i m C ,,, 44,”. f ''+ t - xk S m Z n .S r ti „.. k 2 .x, �{.� a '� .rn S.V v t� j 4' a ,,.'� r 7 .5 A. ,„_C�.. _ C, jfr, '4:, 'fir �. � L, — ?. L ,:x9'^” ..:.c •�- P :m.'�'.., s i t , pm= a mfg, ' 4:73 > Ad4,O m .,. d Dtmnv>m0Znmi r M z 3 D mm0zm �T UHb� "� . xe G� .. . ,/,,,, • a , - mNm=tom z �' - '' - / vym �m cnm Drnmm� r _- m 1 D :' 2 D Z 1 m r k T . 2 no r �, i ' w y ./.4. �, �/ e -4 ,,>_,c) Ell x , „----/ m o o Xi N p 4. o S / Wn / ?' C C r r�y� g02 f:' oZ V G)zlmTic� '. a /li c -;. 0 M=0> r2 -t���� i k �,n- 1F` -zlDZnm ��� �_ — — SAN. C f comes // ''' 7� myz,DD, moo = � %' v��mZOO (i; O �� �� �V � W O v z �� N Tine 1 (i ,,�. _/ ccodp :_Ic2o�>�r �_�_� �\ Jr mD /� -1 ' r rm T t" �f nm0 t ti �; 3I \\ ,,,(f3 I M n O Z - '10,.._,,,,,,..',42L, ,� +,- '' } \, / �r QIn ) DzQrD F 1, �� -I ZmKxz \ ) boo CO .Z7 T1 '�r . \ m„,,, _ i 1 Z Z Z-<0 D " „ &l`1""''`. nw�w c mgr .,, / �/ f✓ H -nimnmai�� / mcnx ° N /, t. ���� w cv� DDV �^ s z • D hH„-- -0''- m z z m i k ^ .�y G7 c , m m v v .tea- —= ,�- mgx ,i a A. M - vD- m m m j _ "�v, m mOD > `� Fc X,0--i* GAO * v . • 1<il � '�fi�"a� s fr- 5,ZD7 0 C>T D 1i ”" t�` s •, S-•Y ry` ti E r 1 S� , W �..;$fir " rw t RI,� '�`� ; p ,,+' i ^'r. = e�;;'k _ rn� : , �� Drnm2m x „, vD tq,.- j �Y y, _ y rn D T�m ,a. .sn it- ' ,��s i f� ,, '` ,� �r'- h 2 •a .4�' '•-. _ �, � - _ ,fir L7.Zp7 r O r_ 73 �' w. # { , s t�^•. �� c .may Xi PF `r "x + "�T ,./, . - t F S° � a ,-,4*,,, �r_i" i f•-fill. ' • '= r . 7k. ' .J _ 1 .. ^ ' µ TI X A z m CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING PLAN NORTH OLYMPIC Cjill) Care/no o O. do* ENTRIX SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT r ' ,'`°` �?z, EArn `t, 0 m° y ,• .. WEST,SUITE 500 o .`c?, o _ 119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON TEL:(206)2ssolaa FAX:(206)269-0098 W COALITION www.prdnoenMxcom 1 /W pN t r ,f " , - 'J ` - ryV.... v -"� _O� r Y- ww , fr 4. 1 .._� ' ._ M�'W 04 XMw ✓ �, , Y I / j ''. ' -- ; ' '-'5'5:''' ' ''' :7(7: '2 ' '1:5: ,,, _. , `,, nx OD O "-r , _ „.,./- mm - ', 1. ., _ .....• z ,,„;-....,',..,,.5::_,-�� vxmo m " m0 m 3m �n ' ,-_ , yZ r ,-i' c xmo.. mo < 4 = D_ �J Q" o mO ZlDZ , p / r ,: , ,t'• � SC - -,, mm mo r m 7 '' / fU� 4a, �A� i / I C pp • , f) 1.-////'`, ' `‘,) \, � () ,r .., kd r , mwNn I z 3 = f , _ _ 1 mo /---- . , ,„--,--___,_11,:'''::-------s r Y so Tom \ �4 p / - S -_ l-, ,' U , V<I - nttfiw I� 14 \3 , n. r. ): i I • ;://,...,,,/ ti/ \ 7.'' III (-9) r ( /7-f;' .,7:::': ' N s ` O r M r, o w ;,� r i 3 [!:JN c nHO \\ N w =k , . , �m a p N - 6 u�I � A 1 N'26 '\ w i V \I m v A r a 2'X V f r O t :)f O HO w O n r " 'I n , pC\ i 33 c9. � . E`:` r j o i■ o � � _ -_ L Dfn ., n, ti o .ice\ N < `. O } y z D ro u _2- + + I mop } w u` r�� v z H .. 1.b� , �1 SNOW-CRE' --Flow°tiw_- - _, �+ v��/ c :--------2F y V '*.s, , , , ,..2, > I m \ m, z o 1 } w m n , W ',- i �' ICY. o A W N Z 6 If(7 :n(n fn(n m-o-o nm I �, rfl H �r •1 11 0 L2DD=r00� + x o F I z j ;,+ 4:,� F �`���'• - r 'n Dnnm .. •a ,o. ..0 1,-- m ITl�1 1 m + m l: I `ilj 71 ._ D 1,11 0)21 i+ ( ! x F '. + ,-1: .',,,,r-3- • __ o',O�`O mom "' r I I �3 �� mt_nO• Orcn1{ x I o �z "'.Nyy + m .' •, AOr T�(n r O m� CCy�� r0 - + /:. u m Zfn— C� 4 i , r�rDr�mO I I i pm Ar -10 �-� p s , Zm40r10� z �C �" �" 3 o m m m v c-1 mo P.� -F- _. n �i v '� \ / C 1▪=1 Om A O r/; O O O O to '4 m '4 m O N N L fn O x Z ODm�oOZ z O o o O z z z z z z 2 2 2 2 m µ mm oz aAOA +, .. \ - 1zO1ZoA.�11 O m m m m 4Zi 6i 61 Lz1 6i A u ^'D Cm o �- r�' �.,r r N DOD 1 D ti o o_ _o o m O rn m x z z m ao r _? y z_ m Z °j �� T O O7 1 m D O p m -i Z A m C r T 13-.- .'0'n V A -I.ZI ,� ". Y - MnyW p—Z1m0 m I, m b� m = rgi A m x 2 r �' m o m a� ;IN v � W3 cs. + Z O�1 ti �^ I 4 m A i° r j m A 00 a v = pP�I; 0 , o A E m '"z N_O o O m A .A.Z z < A r z O o rnw O RI m ,mn0V+ .--,,-1 Tic) 2m .� -..---...... 07 m >>m — m m 'a`A�'X L mp oim x? M It m 2111 o�Z Om A T to A� O D mm Dm 7rn Q Az vm rN ,�` A \\ o▪ z 2 00 m z �, 2 g 1 o k SFF Si... .,:--,. n ` m <r- m O n m v ■ 73 z m O A o� m n < s ym ti V1 y i _ N a NORTH OLYMPIC y' x - z m PLAN WEST «, Z J" Cardno 0 0 o m o TM:r ENTR/X SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT r F.-.`'•"11; sEnrnE �, O d ) `m ZOO FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 °m o N Y.a SEATTLE,WA,98119 a 0 1 m SALMON 4 TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON COALITION wwwramnoenmx.�m J 4 poi p, A W N 7`Z 0 (n U,(n O m m-a 0 m ++ r N.• ~ mmrD-mMOOr— + I ,n v"_'"=�'T O 0 D O F m--I m ++ x I Z T W N N O Rl m5G1xDOOm + - 1, ( O 'rnA �2 p 1mm 1-n A1� ODO m n0�mlmFm I H # I Q r"a'... <8 m 2 owoor-(,$o , I I x I p 1 z 17, ♦L D Z(n m D c F 0 + .~ 0 1 ,-(n,-y,-m m n ++ I 1 1 I I i o o��T ■, Zn 0 r-i m o n v v v m m m m ; m m v A A ' II!I . 2� 1 ■ m ,m(mi,1 o z y v -0 v ° 4 y y rc z -I y LI v tmi, m I ,'�' i 4 ZZZ D0A1 z m ti m z z z z z x D z z z z z tl! �) O O Z O ° m m m m o 4, o p p o G, o G, rN24vDp� 2 v v ° m o w ; m i z m m 7 �,'is �' Z°8 ao O O m e` z z o A m y m m x ° o c c, ■ m f. .5627'r�. Z, 1 m A v 0 A o m x x A a m v m E ill D 11 'I7 Z { O A 3 z y g _ 3 p 6 z '; ( m p O y m 'l I!: whoilI 2 3 z o y A D p c m i z o mm 0 o D ^w' r m m "' ! ' c 00 Z , N b7L \' I f\m m , / .. m m D ■ 0 o I ,NNIIi ■ ■ / m � m y / c ' ■ z I f / ooZ G, DN .Oi' :' •;111 ___'/ `��. 2 O µ8z ■ / ro�m :■ r iH Jy (■J r ' Z O ■ TT _ 1 0n CD , 4 r 11 _ _- ♦♦,mo• Y • o D N y it 7c_ ■ x O N i l ♦11♦♦1 .,•I.a y SAD I` i .♦♦ ♦; r z �m� a . ♦��._ m I7* ■ ••• ♦♦ A m v . �,, ♦♦01 ♦� w qr< xi x ♦I �� 111♦♦� •♦�♦ .''�� ♦�• • - D y IA 0 ' o C II _c _ `�.�; Mai. .133 f ;,,,/- \� �✓♦111 111- o / i/Z///; p l m w i♦vim + '/� o + ,T; o �'`wl�N�? " ,, �.,••• "�\..\.�/i i t v, m - � ,r � fu��l� n' _ 11 ,r�� /F •m?( m4, �' /dr i zz mD 'w :3 • A O • m y c� w o �� �,- `/a :��. N 390j Mme,. + + + m y y z P S M D w m A q.1 ! . ■ •1 �,,, r _ / S N D ,:"'F®00+ f.,..'.- 2 (� ',t 1,/d`./ OOa JMWYx - ' fif IV i. m T ;, ^F + +p n� ry m'° �C. �' ,,,1l/ c-rav qi /,,-+ +_____., „,.. •i- ,z,4'/ -�+' N p Y ee + A O ' ■ 1 \ ♦ i/+ ,+, + p r-4/..../ 7' w - `..P 1111 Y ••• , ' `] + + ;. , p o N , l t /�� + q - ..p o ,, FYL c - r t i + + �� �1. _ '. �+ _.-F - n ° .D \...... 1♦ ��p i +- ■\'' �.: do ' �t w i+ �. z;,-., r A , r PRC:3+93:9. '; ., , i- + + <- b t +�' + + L - -' 11% I to''' n § + + + -_,m \ I /a'` _,>,„ ,,,- � A� - 7 .`-'? m� r �- + + �! ' �� r / �� °amP ym .. 1 + +' + + A �` p Z D 9 °I✓r y, ( ;' tio�e i E� + + ` CD 9 --- -- m + :+ .-yeti of ' r y —� — t z� o p C w m 0 n ° ° z y NORTH OLYMPIC z X m PLAN EAST a c° ' J) cno ENTR/X° < m m o a 03 SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT > aE ' 'i1 ' " SEATTLE d r� r 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 N °m ° ,, "�"�% y SEATTLE,WA 98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX."(206)269-0098 F, COALITION www.carclnoentrixcom / A mo az �m G y F, 7D0 y m y,, "X m"' mz m� y y m n 0 O D z X A Jd m m O l7~ O o f11 � na A� O O O �° m 332 9ON Q> m°p np ° m �R c O m T y° 2 ^�Z N h! 1 2 N Z m' µ 77��r�rA A°y °,�v vm AO tiD�`�` D 3 O�LZ'7 Z y On m0 0 A,\yq .m.-Z �nm �m AD {20\ ' CA c .! _Im 2ZLD1 AA gm $H 2A r m� Z �- µu° \\\\ mo xoii � \mm m0/ , ; ' \ -..4 v , I 1 ,5 ` o � N� N , � rf - '- 2`D o a� _ ♦f1 22 --11.11101%11.4,11.141••••■rda , VT,Z6\\ 0 -‹ as t�� A \� .UD-=I 35 y ,,,,s,_:::::::.(r.,,,,,___ _ ,,,,i__, '::-., ‘N !2! y__1_,,',1-k:,,,,_7_ ___'________,i,\''''':'1\1'1'17'''''''''''''''' 20 , ‘ „..,,,......__. __4,_ _ ,,till , , ' i<' t _. ---t tt t -. ♦ ,, 4,3-_ _ __O i F q A M O � _` �'- - UN T A as .t ,yCam.--4a 1 m..ym P �„ . by. -oCm2 Op8- El my o6 _� , VOy v n AZ o ` _ t m O m A A u N + I ��I 11 x 7 _ _( I ( ' I x o Z _I !: !: i ( +y ++ 1 x 2 I -__ ``_ - - ' - -- - 5 5 y m 1 r N = A A zsg,..,riiog O i ti 9,° Z 0 A 2 g A / e ss O m°m g g O O O '7)`' F x m ti ti ° -I N '11 N (ti O " �:- D s__ n W�� y ti � N' 1 Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 D{ G 2 y O A n p S O m y y m v T v O m O m Z n A O m X m Z Z _20N S E z 0 T p y ° r 1 a~ Z 0 'T. , _ - Z y_: ,A Z<� <- i m Z O r 0 fZ m r y z m 3 3 A a O c T l ti O z A c 2 r ° r O O O O m m m r ti m T _ w o ��r a r r m A X n ._. m O v m m y y NORTH OLYMPIC �, '-'; Zx Z m PLAN UPLAND fir, ‹.1, ENTRIXIICI 1-_ CO o ° ° a - �' ',0 , �r'c'7/'10 -A SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT ' \ `{TM › 1 SEATTLE n o F o 0 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 m ° �'�'�� . y '' SEATTLE,WA 98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON I TEL:(206)269-0104 FAx.'�2os)289-0098 \ COALITION ` b wxroucartinoenhrx�n J , -z v I x I.0D73D� -j OOmz ,,'' : Y ,..rni—AIIII r O Z r m A e R om :� E 0.- m -,- Y y r T C .•>OIC r 0 us o cn A C) G W 3 a .11 y y O D X171 a 4': -711", °n c v° cT c� A rsi* z OC70� OP 4, _ zz c T1 Z—I :i7 � �Z -- - e.: —1 m ° m L)aInO > I , o ° =D C� r, .-. -- Z 2m rt5 r .h co 7.N v m D r 0 '` �'�'�. m o o O ,1 m r ��' r' " z {D D — r a 1°vm A Z O ? z O r7 & I*, r i' -- '-- / i / J F _iP i E I \1 . i ..: « s _ y(^ }MI5.. E_ F E E 4 p ' t'.4'.71',-'..,'"..1; r - ef ,li I E :: po e ✓f I E pct •i>1 d am / I y v ` * 4 t E _I f F F E E f H z + E E E E E E E f, , '`- -, . /- ,.. F F E E E E E • R/' / F. E E E < E 4 / E E E 4)• ( ' E E E E E E f�1' I •w E E E 4 E 4 Ci)' Q Y - 1 4 E F' * E F E 6 z 8 O y ,h v t I - j 1 E F E E E F E 4 w A k. `4_;� ' €s : - / . E E I''. I a F . E F c E E f f r -90 ,.f oz i+ m (r 23 I I ,E E f E f E E f E F E E E z m —I A — -;47 A.h. 1 � a 4 yf i _ ` f F m A N D co D. I .a,' t E E E * E E E E m o ' CO - I ';',14,:f..,,. { ' y 'kiE E E E E mCmN _ _ co ' __..<c� T Y r.______-_IL__ - y ( *� F Yom, E E ;I-Z ! - + x f z 'tom. - E F E . f t E f . E o ;,, R " £: E E E E f E ` x F E '"\- 37..5, \ ''v '4a• E E * E * \F E :cA 4 f _t ! E r, / E - E E E F f 4, J P f E 1 I., µ E -E L _ Y' E, %E 4 E E E f f40 E • CCC E f E E E_ �� 4 E E. v G f E E E E�� ��\ qq = . x T * 3 E E E '' E tat A. "aP'41,0,4,1,'3 V E E E f 11 . F.�`ryy�y�� 1C� ■ adder' a , vJ_ ySrYr \1 -< .: 4 1 W {/ ,:.,II .::,,I.107,',1. r., - 1��r L a iY1cr. A �'c w .,4 ; r -P t 4*- - 3 * ..1• ', < 04'_ r y,L ry 'FF -x» ,,:y• YI Y _ t _ m-T i/� ! C 4 'lrF'C �r _ }` x 7 I2Q=Ei S r t• S• 2 ` �.p • :. '1/24.,11',...i5...(40: F � m tip T , «�lM 1~ ' e", ",,qk j x,' ip ` .omo,d' ', t I : t _ k c �"+e ib '.•. r 'A '•i ; f M { F 3a� � f ri 1 * -,-,---4 F. �`' tf'Y � '' - � i' \ d� Yt " �� '3-'�`,.�: a. .•F 'l`-? `'t i >N� -{ 4 y b• .+ `rj �` - . xw k `«.,e 74- a }'' r:-a. ." xX „ AW �� `,' f r iF '; `r v t y ,'� erh ) fs i `e. Ei . :,i.,:,-'0•.. !s "?:':',h`xF- 9b r r' �� ,,,:§ �: � v i x ; w"F a H^ x --4` 1 - c T z y '• _ i z = ° °m y NORTH OLYMPIC r. i m x 0 z m FINAL SITE STABILIZATION PLAN ‘1111) Ca/'rd/�O o z ° ` A a� ,.4% . ) ENTRIX 0 SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT ' r ' f'�` SEATTLE-ID ,.. S>:' • _� 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 81 o x ° L7 ec • v'a' ? SEATTLE,WA 98119 0° m om SALMON '1 TEL'(206)269-0104 FAX.'(206)269-0098•JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON COALITION www.caninoentrixcom 0 A .4 OMFFMMOMW a m Z y m o— Nv o ;I1:!-H p p g y, °mo v �OZ3N Z O z o y ; HIh; m:0C 0 03b°hh!Z NTN mZCA< Z W >0 0mA ; rO 0N D' N z =b mO aD C ; ZmrO D� mZD NN-m ODoD ' y a_oz� m p m m a o N 0 m Ow SA m N >0 Omm m m • rnz 0 = ° y m A D<Z A EO m m O Zm Z 0o zN; O W r C Z m u- mm �m`0 3 r < °y mD= mn N ZS° mn N0 N°\ \ H-Fm N :\/ y N O / \\/\\\ �A+ °°°ODmpN D DZ?m DN mCm0 .p r z m; z -i O z m 3 \ \\ rj=µD nzOAp Ny m mN mND \�\\\ i. 0mr mr-m»o N mm-,no \\/� V=. C y m000, r m< D V! �mm yvOA �.lIAvOA ��\\ � ZV3 �2Z<WyZA NO'ODZA /�/\\\' / \\\i O 0 z +� ° W D /l rn \ \\� \� \ \\i \` \�\\� \/\%\ \i\�\\�- \�\\\ , rz \/ /\\\/\ N�X 0 \ N OM \ \\ •\\ \>�\� 'am \\\ DN� oonN zmNm z co \�\ z \\\/\/ m °a /\\/\\ . L' °� / \\ I \\\/\/\\ s W A /\� \/ FF :\(• -\‘>\ \>4;; rn \ \/\ c \\ \�\i\\i 4 '10 p \\i 0 o r \V o Z �//A/ NF m V/A N \/\\ _ 0 N Z o \ \\ = \\\ m m o D ..� ,� \i i: • cn m --� V,/\\ / a - ' > \�\\/ 79 \/\ \�\\� \i i\tea :` �i\ \ m PNNNN:Nd p DrDm rr ° \\\\�\ Z <O N m 3 s a %\\ \\/\�\\ \\\+��' '. °-gym°3" /\\/ \\ HiI;c 0 ' I!bI \:J;) m ,I NrO�m m Z / \/ x�fr a ° /\ \,•o / \0° �g mO Zm Dn h9i \ \%\\ .411° y \O mP(i� \f z›nr- GI A T. X mZ \\ Z \ �\� Z A a m \�\\ \\ Nom A OE D ZCS `< my p \\ W m DETAILS-ESTUARY RESTORATION NORTH OLYMPIC C.) Ca/*Cif f0 02 02 m ° j K SNOW CREEK ESTUARY Lf4--� � � ;;+ �;' v ENTR/X r t I SEATTLE 0; o ° ° d RESTORATION PROJECT 4% 200 FIRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 " ° 31 S' SEATTLE,WA,98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON ,, '` TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX(206)269-0098 www.caro'ncentnx�m 133 o rn Iri I�. 0 ' D CO J m D 70 11 D 'I °A ° x, -Lji m I 0 0o n®A, rn F m rp r• Fs! •��, \i r0m ili=�11 i Q zr, So�,D en 0 z 0 I-1=1 1 0 g X 0 ��� � 1n 111_ mid z m m A f=;IN I r Wm / HI 00� 0Z 0 ark IAA -0 D •/ CO N N Nm Z(7 N i�-1'', p n �n N /\1 `I I FIl➢ y< \/O -, I D0 > 0 D ~ 0 cN O >y i I I D A N o� 11� I "IL\` I O v\ m NC 1 1l z D, ......A1 I D Z rn li Z NI- co ""„` Y NO °Z o r9 m 1-<4 . I 0-0 rn II �) c°�p m o i a �V1�1� rn /..., \I Z m "�'r 1 A -1 X 111111\11 I O O \ DSO 70 A o �\; (Iv- m oam Om . o z1 F z -•z Z N y 1 i� o�X p: z5 Z° m X1 000 ME fA-➢ rn o. z 0 NAp mN am z in>n°0ro7* s °o mz vO�y ZN XN� yy //�� m yC 23o \! A '�� r r.3O rO O xt NA0 --11 o � Z FzN ,A p17 AZ ° iai t!IIIIIiI1I O N N 3 !:j m D D N Z-1 I ; O 1moo °�� O y VIMNm y • AZ�r '9 OD mfr. m�° g° FAAa. m vI `co Pi itiiitiihi ° °z co �I I 0 Z o z D=i{ppi{ r; 1 3 O D l i.• J m y Z A F m (tI:3i4 p N TI D o-o Z a 'd Z Q °d zm n M ZE 0 o kA 0 z m— m \. to CO n O p CO r > a ° ``t\ rsi, �D 00° m ° mp N An j A A m� Z m0 W Z 2 r D m= m m Z W Z 1 A D 1I1 Am o n 0 V, m p Z N 0 A• �� °O r 0 O N ° nC m m m Z Mm o °° D O 0A i f z N IM 11. O D m� Zr Qp® A CO Z p 0 F m 2° m ° D 3 0 0— 90N N Fv ZO Z VIN n2N m WZ O 0 0- D v r m r O m N n Or IX rD Z 0 pr N , oiz m °; Dn, 0 ZrZ D N„ X.N Zr 50m -i yN "' —_ mrri W. O D, N A \/ / ``� \\//J IZ/1 fm*1 A m / ; 11 / /\ll 0 \\�♦ ■ 1 I �cyYf O \/ j� / \. Z \/ l_} ��N — m / / t= • NN°W ZION -iA Z �/� j / `f[` vaz° =m oQnf ROADWAY _ zm D ycc�xim y /\\ _ 0 mm m I zm Aa,7.m!!I my n \ / yZZ 0mpz �mZm 90 . • VI{ OAN m �0Z ':?.`..•.;111,1• _ D yDD`! 1 Vz Np .•••$o }:1111 FtF 0> cam /�/. 01-- NV,rn ►�► 70 0-1zn�Am my°0 '-1 ' '• ..go,� � ?0. n r�0 AX AON 0o V, / _ -. D° 2 Dp1.0, O AD 't-','tritt••..vt..,.' z� r ON m0 m0 D- <A KO 2 _65�'.1� 1� l�'1• �6 m m�W A 0� n v 2cra- N\.C• y DAZ fNq mAmO �;.... 11 ♦\�.p oA ZZ➢ o zz n Il / y. y o—m0 �a zmom / ;.o ,Q Vm D \=�► AND OA -1(o`SN . NO =e m \ +O W mz> z Z0D .' D Am mV,v - °��m �`i t •`gIX y MD yZ -C,+,m O \► m°t=°C Dm A�m t!: 1i■ 2 O Z \ y► Z m ZDmA nm ,0m W/r / �� 0 ,zpmmN Dg� GD� [I� =► o n vniv� °z= Amz o o a c___ — 0� �y mN m o =-= Z f�1A� �W pZm ^ 0 0 & Zc1 Is e Z ��,`o DA•V, / m y vc Wm Aw o zc 1 r: ./��; mo • / _ 0 ,AO 80 'F o rc/� /`' m•.. , 1 m=0 65.: tk N ': ,\Ny v • / rn >,,z _ \rDOAm ••„ \ •�\; _o •••• :. •. \Z °D `t2 \ ; cI �1 up l �: DZmZ T� \�Y mo ON D Dn 34 5 �. Nzm0 E, N N, N va X mC N Z CNF °O�'.O ,.,CDD m \ \A po ON .. Zm NF N A A A 9.o.°�3 a1 4NA47 �, \ p'I i ZD i mN o �°N c�,� $I. .fl,.fl'.:��I„•71: ozr�* A r0 KF ? O V 3 °D� aoOR oO$J.oO�o m3 O 00 Z A z I (NN -i co v N o 5 4110 { F---3 I p 0 A N N r m °ON o 0 z N Z co) (� 9 v m) i ° ti >7-. NORTH OLYMPIC ` . S�S DETAILS-BMPS 'to " i o < 84� --- ENTR/X no N SNOW CREEK ESTUARY =�<!1 c sEarnE IN o F ° 0 d RESTORATION PROJECT . '},°, 200F�RSrA VENUE WEST,SUITE 500 m ° SEATTLE,WA,98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON TEL:(206)269-0104 FAX'(206)269-0098 COALITION a` www.cardnoentrx.com / O E v o N m O D Om N D O-. D :N N z r r . z 0 A0a O m O '7 r Z O 0 *Oj, N m O o- I 0 v)r m u � = I 0 Z W WO O D I1 ■ 1 8 ,A{2 Z O °. o H z* "t j y En 70 moo o C ,n0-<-1 z o C Z - 1W) t, st gt PI E IT 1 .N D LAZ Z ®0� D . r0. OON rp1Z co Zvr 0 0 Z ti A y m Z*r a �rlr- Z� A o�F± OWN F z -Els II C A r O .-. to �" w I -oZ Da A f+0 H- A 0_.r o N yo II DZ FF rl+`r O . . . Ft ZN vAi co >w CA 00H- AH- Z /. . k •. d\ r m x0 cm . . . Z mNyD�D D r y Ar ear xi*.p- -O O r r !1iI Z �'•. .�•L£ '°l. ZDII OZ 0 00 NO O CAM', r- 2 v r Z la# ' • .' '. ANO = 71,7A-Ir p" AOOm D D ZZD .• Av m m W O xZN�m ZO moot o y R�o ZO TN o rn { 9 O ' N 0 En c :: 0,1e4,,,,./ 0 Pa m :,,,/,//' /;"i isiop 111 r m //q�l�.: l l O D Z mrog a r D z N 1 /Ni v O D Z Emil F Z D //�/ v A V, N to Om r y i J/,//. 0 0 FF °v m m 4 / /j m FPm A v_ F m m o — e p� oN ` 1 Aga v m r r., �z-1 0 ;// d D W Cw o W Iv f Do F e .!; v:,,'7.,.. '",./� '. D W v ii A A N �`: II Z Z Vi Z L O T o H' o a to -n Fr r �Z 0:1,- H- O p� ZO r0 m 0. z Z O a O A 0 c m z x v N 1_F ; m AZZ ' o m-0 En 4 vzmz vov on t. -4 i ti Z to 0- eel J' ,, v .,i `,' I t -•Z l' H uom oz moz>m NOZDX ry•,. -,. .. 5H o@coo0 On Dow�D ? :',11:'• , rJ.r' Z-I -Lao m A cVN� x 0 A OD Z mN �O 1- Z-1-•- "'S ��p • X. I- yG m'O ANDn M �''+ D ♦#*y 0 O Z i to i-.: ,�.,. r m A G {t' En tlr rr I i v m i v °m °n NORTH OLYMPIC r i z m DETAILS-LWD HABITAT STRUCTURES �, Car) Caredno #� _ p ° m m W SNOW CREEK ESTUARY �—► : ' �E\ „ +:9„, • SEATTLE ENTRIX W ,r►� • r st w p d RESTORATION PROJECT �-..' /j` cj 200 FIRSTAVENUEWEST,SUITE500 v o N ✓ � a SEATTLE,WA,98119 SALMON TEL:(208)269-0104 FAX:(208)269-0098 w JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON COALITION - www.cardnoentrix.com c No A N N N N W W W W W 2 A A A A A A A C A 0 O V Co co 0 .N.. N CO N N N r A (n co 0 V 0 CO O N W A (n # O Co V 0) 0 A CO V co Co 0 W CO CO M iL 0 0 Co A O . 0 '(00 '(0D V V N O. Ow) CO (00 W O) 000 O W CO 0 N CO ' ' B) co 0 V A A V N N Cr) W O (0n C N V () tO -+ 0 0 .P N Co a 0 - .P V --` N V 'J ° C3 0 0 W O CO CO (0 0 Cn 0 E 0 N N O 0 0 :; a CA W V 0 W 0) N C.) 0 O N 0 ' N N _ N N � A 0 f0 0 W 00)) � CO 0) 0 N N (n 0) r N 0 GI j O Cn 0 V V (0) Co O A Cn CO A Co in W O 0 O N 6. .0 N N N N 0 V W Co N A CO 0 N 0 0 - co f • O W 0 O O O 0 W A In V 0 V N W 0 N O A 0) 0 W 0 W 0 W 'co A a• CO 6. —O 03 W 03 00)) V - CO 5. W C; V) co fn Cn cn Z CO CO (A CO n r cn (n N N O N (00 N o O O N co 0) A V 0)) W C, (7 W 7- r Cn CA (n Cn cn °- r 0 N (e O 0 N O 0 9 0)) O O N N Co 0 ° ? A V W ? 00D 0 V W V O U J O ? w Co CNO- N A N G. 0 O° A N rsi 0 N Q C A Cn N N0 W 0 O O A co N A W W = A W A v N 0 "' ? t0 N 'p 0J D ^ Co • V N A O W W W A O W W A G) GNG (O A W A W O b O O i° C_a. V O A• CO A A O 0 (CDj = 00 r A CO A A O N .J W = m G cn m Rl 0 00 (0 W N A ....1 j D 0 O W 0 (NJ 0)) W 0 (00 O > O V O N W 0 () = I— m m m m m m r ni m m ni m m ni Ri = w 0 O ° Co O1 0 o Y G7 1— m m g r CO BT p. w Co w w CO Co w w Co w w a Co Z cn Z -°JD b °DD Co V Co -1 Co CO •4 Co w CO v m V -4 -4 -4 V V V V V V V � w Co CO w w w w Co 7. 0) V N Co V O CO N CO p W O CO 0 Z V V V V V 0) a) 0) 0) 0) 0 -0 m o V V V V V V V -a V -4 V A N t0 CO V V 0 (0 O 0 0 0 0) C) 0 0 0 0 Z 0) 0 CO V O ,3.' CJ o N CO 0 A 0 co Z N CO N N Co Co CO N Co V Co W O CO 0 N W CO W W "Co W W -CO W W CO C -Co W -CO f0 0) CA Co 0 O 00 'co W (00 (00 CO Cn � 0) N O A O O O) '_" —I 0 0) 0) 0 0) 0) 0) 0 () 0 0) 0) 0 w w -CO w w w w 'Co -Co w w N Co 3 0 w w w w w V 0) 0) V 0) 0) 0) V -4 V 0) V : 0 0 0 0 O) 0) Cr) VA (n fn 0 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) V C A A N (V)) (B V -4 OV) 0) 0) V C U, V 0 0) 0)0) 0) 0) 0) W (An V 0 O 0 OAO 00) Co N V CO m 0) 0) V V V m 0 (0 0) 0) 0 00)) V 0 co O (n CO O O O CO 0 A 0 V W ) 0 Cn j 0 0 O A 0) 0 0 Co 0) O V 0 W co A Co N V V m'^ CO (On N v V 003 V N lm^ Co Co N Co N N Co 0 co 0 Co —I 00) A CA C00 W ON) 0 W cn -4-. O -1 W W A O N (0)) 0 W {A A IT m m w w w w Co CO w w 03 = CO a V V V V V V V Co v Co v w co co co co co w Co a a CD CO 00O 00 CO CO CO CO CO 0 0 CO CO 0 v V 0) V V V 0 OVw) 0)) 0)) co co co V co 0 0 V V V V V V V Co 0) V N V O Co N W O W C0 „>,. N N - V A N CO V V N N N W N N W (0B 0 O O •) CO CO V L. 0 .Co W O Co Co V O N 0 0 A O CO O a O CO Co V 0 (a 6 (0n ti V Co N W V co O Co CO N Co N - Co 0 O 00 W (00 c0 Co 0 -0. 0) Cn Co 0 N O O W C) W W 0) W -co -co -co W W W W W -co -co -co W W W W W CO W ()) N V 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0) 0 0) 0) 0 0 0) 0 0) 0) 0 0) a) 0) 0) W 0) 0) -co 0) A (AO N A (0)) 0 0)) A 0) 0) 0)00)) O0) V V V V 0) 0 -4 V 0 0) 0) 0 0) 0) 0) 0) V (V J) N (0 - NJ W 00)) V V V W V CO (n V 00) 0 CD Co A 00) O N V A 9) co (0)1 (00 (00 O co 0 A 0) 0 0 (p 0) 0) W W N W � N N 000 OA) Cn 0) O CO 0 0 V O Co O A W N V 0 A V N V V 0) V co 0) W CO 0 O V 0 0 N) 0 0 0) A 0 O 0) 0 A 0 O Co 0 0 W 0) 0 W W ? O N In O C) C) C I- n C1 CDN V 0 (n a A W N CD 0 CO 0 _A N W CD A (n X _ 0 N V N V N a O CO • N 0 0 co N 0 N W o Co W N A (0j) A CO N 0V CD N Cr, N W N (wn A V co = Co O co CO N N N N N Co Co 0) r 0 Co -. V CO 0) A _ 0 O 0) 0) CO V 0 O w V (1) 0) Co V W N CO CO 0 COO 00) A - W S CO r CD CA Cl) a DI -4 CA 7- O ? (Zn C.) F)) s r Z 0) cn Z (/) Cn 0- r0 ° C N 0 Cr;., O O N c' 9. (o n° Co -A-. O _ w °- 0 0 A 0 0 G. C co 0 N W W °- //''�� - O N _ V O co O 0 0 O 0 0 V N Cn O 0 O N 0 000 CO A N 0 I -• N W o4). N V O O > W 0V 0O > V N 0) -A 0) O D O- g 03 0 W A ' r m m m m m m * 7 m m m m ni m G) ^ Co CO- Cu- Co Z cn Z co co Z CO CO CO 0 '� co W W CO CO Co co Co CO Co W Co O 0 m CO CO Co Co mm ° Z Co�O CD CO m cn co w CO co V co V w 0 m N Co (n V " cn V A (Nn j' Z 0 0 0 A O VOi ° Z 0 V N 0 0) O) ib '-I O 0) .O-. —I CO W p A (n O V O V 0) -co 0) 0 0) 0) W W -co -Co -4.1 01 W W W W -Cu W W V V V V 0) 0 0 0) 0 5 0 0) 0 0) 0 0) 0 .` O 0) Co 03 V V V V ` V V V V V V V CS O Co V W V 0 0 0 03-4 ` 0 0 V 0 V V V CO N CO V m (00 .... Aw CD Cl) V Co 0 V 0 O co w m `-' U �I c0 -4 V 00)) 0 W V/ CO -• N N W A 0) ▪ m - ° m m a o 003 C003 00- 03 0- w -0 CO CO Co Co CO a co co co Co Co W W 0 V V s ° CO CO CO CO Co CO V V -4 V V V V N A V O O O O O CD A -, W 0 O 0 V A 0 A a C.1 ..co W W is 0 iP O j (n A (On o V o V Ca W O 0 0 0 0 W W C,) 'Co W 03 W W W W W -co V V V V 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0 0 0 V V V V V V V 0 CO CO 03 V V V V V CO V CO Co 0) 03 03 Co 0 0 0 0) V 0) V V (0 Co 0V A AW n 0 01 p Cn V O N -, -, Co (0 co, N3 .0. O V N O o Co V W O o (n V 0) 0 W (n -` 0) 0 N W A C r C n A n ) 0 0 0 C ) n C C C 0 C N N w a rn Z O N CO CD m m A (n 0 V CO CO O N W p m N; W it AO▪ 63 (On ? C A A O iA 'co A V A a N W CO CO V p Cr, Owp A (NO O DAj N 0 0 O 0 A 0 V 0 (Cp 0N) co (00 Co 00)) co A O� A -A Co A O Cl, j▪ co O 03 N . Cn N 0 N N N CO r IJ 0 0) O 03 0) A 03 0) A CO 03 .Cl. N N N 00) O — Co 0) 0 Cn (n co -A N O Co N 0 W CO O CO N W V 00 Cl) - A W O 0 O 0303 00)) ,..,.4' A St A Cnn N O O0) W A N N A -A p CO sc C) Cl) 0)Z Z n r V] CA CO CI) CO CO CO CO CO ) r- <n C cn Z Cn Cl) cn Co r A O w O N N W 0 0 W n O n co -, A p V a N O 0 N O V A 0 0 W ° D • a N o o o O 0 O a C a C ° C W CO W N W N A N A A O A A A 0-4 A O p V CO A n N O ^ Cn 0 + (n A O 0 N p ^)W 0 Co N = W W N A 0 CO N N = N ' O O a n p IV (n CO N C (n CO o V A D V (n -4 O A 0 N CO t0 V A 0 CO ()(n CO O Co O .. O 0 W O N U) N W 0 CO 0 W V O n O O D O -. V ° D N O 0 V N 0 O O Cn O D CO O N O N 0 W 0 n V W= 7< m m m r ID A La Z Z a) Z Z C,) CO CO w 03 Co 7' W W Co co Co W CO Co Co co CO Co Co Co CO W y CO V 01 CA 03 p m 0 0 Co 03 03 CO 0 Co Co 0 Co Co Co Co CO Co 03 Co Ca CO CO CO w Co Co 03 Co Z N -0 m 0 Cn A CO .j. CO N - N V 0) W CO CO A N ° 0 a') W N tj j A 0 g. m O in a Z o V 03 u0, a w CO g• Z V O CO A 0 W (n —I V O ? 0 io V V V O N 0 (0 CO N W N A ,p, 0 N 0 N 0 N A i Oa Ow) C,)0) Ow) m W W 4) -Co f,) -Co W W W W 1.) CO W Co 0 N 3 (n A 0 Co (0 V (n N V V V V V 0 0) 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0) 0 W W W W W W W W -Co W W -CO V V V V V m V V N W W V m V V V m 0) 0) V 0 0) 0 0) 0 0 0 0) 0 l!� (n A W N N > (n (n 0 0) 0) > (00 A CO 0) V V V V W OVD m r_�i "'d'`i� CO W V CO W A V CD N A (n 0 0 0) O 0 N D ONi CO T 0 O 0 V 0 V A O O Co V 0 O W -, V Co A W O '. , O Co .� O CO 0 0 N V O 0) -• V 0 V A A 0 0) V —I (ND N Co V 00 Co 0 A W . (0O N 0 _I °Y. m i� w co co w Co -0 0 m -4,-.� 0 0 Co N Co co co W W co co co W W W wo- w i Ls 0) N) ON) ° 00 00 CO Co 03 03 Co Co 03 Co 03 Co w 0) w0 03 Co Co w W W co co W 0 0 0 0 A O .�. 0 CO Na A 0 V CD O O O N N N N N N N 0) CO CO 03 Co O V CO 0 0 CD V N CO V 0 Co 0 0 A = Co 0) 0 Co N Cu j Co - O Co CO 9 V co N CO N i>o O N .A f)) j Co 0 O 0 0 CO V 0 U) A Co co M -Co C') W -Co W - A 0 N) 0 N) 0 NJ O. W 000 N) A N A CV)) W (00 V 0 Ib V V V Cr) V 0 0 Ow) Owl T "CO -Co Ow) Ow) Ow) Owl Ow) Ow) Ow) Ow) W W -Co -Co W -CO W �( V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 0 0 V O A O W CO Co N A- N V N V A O O 0 0 (0n o) co(00 A C00 0 N -A -4 W OV) Co V N W N 0 ' 0 0) 0 -4 0 0 03 V Co A 0 •. N 0 0 0 O ? O io 0 Co N j 0 N N 'co 0 0 O N 0 V A A 0 0) O CO N) CO V Co Co A Co 0 N F1, p n y NORTH OLYMPIC z ` o m ALIGNMENT LINE & CURVE TABLES `� (r,a/'IC AO ma o 7 < `� � ^� ENTR/X SNOW CREEK ESTUARY RESTORATION PROJECT / z '�)'`"#�1 SEATTLE ,-,1 o W `" T o a,(► 5•5iP, 200FlRST AVENUE WEST,SUITE 500 y:,a} ' SEATTLE,WA 98119 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SALMON TEL:(206)2690104 FAx(206)269009e COALITION www.carclnoen6ix.�m J .„. , . . . -0 . .„ -,,... ._.,-, ..- , ;Asitc--.7. 4q.....,,... ,., -• .0- .• , .•., , , CV , , , will -.-'„ -,,,, ',-.4:,,.-4,,,t„ .. ..t. ',.., ' - *.- -, ,e....-- . , .,,• :,,iji. - - • k• . 'ie.. , •,,,,Tfirr,,,,,•••i*.„!*:••.&•piii „,-, , • a, .1..a- ..-Itnie:, > .\‘, 3 , — i ' '. - t ' ' - ' ' .1.'4; ''''1."- '..k ' ' i c n, ..'' .,4' -••••...t,...-, wp,..,4.* 411S: .f ...'.:\r `'. ? . . '..1 '. t' 11 't''`: - M'; . ' ,,tv - , '"''' -.'" Ar .P-445.,...,,,r;1-• -.. 8 .. 1 elitair z . . , .4" uN ,„.i ,,,,, -... ,,,.„. : ,,,,. . ..:,..,... .,, ,,.....,....-0LitD.%fr,RIDatttl ER RDf - . . IF :,'` i,-:::-•=1,Vig,l'-..t.i.;... 6-P.. --cic-.;:ii;',A. . -,' , ' -.. -4, . , . --T, ,- 40,4e,. '' . "-4 :., AL -..-k., ., -, , -, ; ., ; .. - -,- :.: ;.. .-, -.', x.,:•,,,,,--. - ' • . „ , . . , t , . ,. ._ , ,,,„. " .z.,..,.=1.,...,_,,,,,,-e..,,....,-,,-. , ,-,...4 :-:....4eri,..-"-,- -' '"' , ,'-'-.--,.."--v-,.,,",--*,.... .4, ,,tvat Aar - . . , .. ,..-- '+' ++ t : .,... -;.`" - ' M C-+" ').,,.:,.'-' .4:' ^ •..= '5..'f.,'." ' - .:,'1111144"""- 1-rr.74,',1:,',;‘,',4,'';..;1.•-.:;,.-,,'•.'..,',.<:.""'-+ -c't:--..,..-st.1''S- . w - A , - ,. - . , 4,g- - - .• ,_ , ,,-.4. --- 4 '-' _-,-, .. . .. , ''' , ' ' . . • -„Ii! r—, .1 4„ . • .-._. .. 1St ..,,.'-' ' ' , -:,. . i L. ..y.-,..., .••.....,- ,....,;0-3_ i ' .4-- .- -.4. 'v ...,142,......;-,. li. ,.) I, lilt ,.,\'`,. z ,',z,,,,,I, 51, . 4t4',i, :f.; ''' , ',.-,:...,-..; 14,.-17"-':'''":.; 4 '.4-'1'!. ;"8":; '':„'.::.lt:;i.::4-:-';-1 13 ) ),.:... XJ _ *'....* '*4- ".' '.,''', ,f , - :e...* ' - "---,:-.,-;14.-;:,,,......- :`,:,...., e- -,;,.'•-0.-- '.... --e... - ii: Cr 2, - . -. - N- * . s -----„:-..:::-,,,,r.,..,-.-/ ;- -Ire ,A , . it -oats . ;,=:....'-''...„'..f...-:-;#0 .. ' '...,,,,'-'7".,..';4."!-::.,' :N,,•,:./,,,-,..,-;.,'ti-','-',.t,-:K.---`1-At.. ':.14.-.,11,-.5y ., "t) , ,- q • ''.,c-...>11' ,'{'. V.45 1...e0'..9...5 t. 'lc, ''' 'i ..- - :. ,r •".", - - ■A i _ , . 4 M iir - fy t. 410, 6,.. .._, :0, ...,.._,,. - ,,,„7, '., * - - . .. - / ,--=-: „... .,-,..;,,,.... , ,, ii , t t' ' c'04 : '' t,5. ., -, , _ . - ei- ,,,-, . ,:-.- . -,,A ,,..'-,,...,;, ,4.,---,,,:?.'"15i.7:,-^'`.;,,4"e.:', ,;,,-,t,,,.-St,' -:-:-.:,0 e,.+,';.:.,..- .'•,. 0 , . _ , ' ,'...=, .-.. .,r , *fi / f., ,, . -;.'-`.."-.-4W,A-',:4••‘••,; ', ,,' i•AV - ' , . , t ,., ., .,,• ?,,,,, .. ,•.'. '-,-,•,A•-.4. Z * '•=04*.'N• ••• ,. ..', „, - ,T , ')--- .g.,.',.:',..,..g*..;4.-'.....-:',.. --y ''-:. At' ' ' - .-- . '---,4,-,' ",y71 .' -ti,-1.,,..,,,-,.- --,,-.--t7,-1,,kz'",,,' m , - 1, .i. -- i#iti 4 '' i :3 .' I '...= A . . ;: , t.: , ",,,i' C ' 46 '0) -‹ ' . . 1. , .,,.",.i .7'11:ti:: 7.44f:t%141', ,,,' . - 11!,,. ,i7; ..*- '..4 s.: 1.' s - :''''''''' : : ,, 8 f. :':;,,'-‘,``-,1i.`'---,e,. .:..--:,i-,:j,!:''',., i I '"' ---. - ' i', - / --------'....:,,,„--..._•',., --..--:. ,,: :- -..-.-'- , - 4 , . .-/:*,%r.--',..g-..:;. '-.-.1 . ..- lk*A•i, a0., A...7..,... '44 , _ . -• • , ., f fr,- 1 „ ' .-„.„..'i•!„--=:. !::,::,. . •••• , (/) - - ,:, „w s4 . . .., ., . I :::::,-.:‘,- ..--...,::- ... .. . . . .... V4144, = * r-,.. At,-.' ...... . ... 4 ._....`• .. k . , • 7-tilw ' . ''r r : 1 ' -' I r— ..,,„. ;..,,-,,--,...-_,,,,,,,=,. ..,..r.,,,,,; - • . , :ti, *.:A = f • f 4. .., vt , -1,-A) > ,N '-'-,,-.-.1 \ ,,,.'''•'-=`. ar. , .,. 4 4 0..40 1 -->i in '' in .., - .;,..,+..- . . .-*Itrift§, - .. ._. 7 --I .4-,T.Ct. < - . Ie. ,: ::41.44...ie,,: i t,_>.° cn , . ...'" . .., , . 1101t,,,,,. . t- '4?,‘%,'M- --: * 4., , ' , - : . --.3 _. . . , . • . . ill , A; :::_:?!. . ..'A 6% 4; i ,, , ,, . , ,. 0 , , ' i - - ...::, _.•.. , .„ „ < $ , . _ .. -.,„ „,,..„ . .r. .1: ..,c; m . ... . .........„.„ . . . _....... .. .. . -4 ._ , - - , 0 ,i - ,f.J, , . ... . ...., „IL., . ,„. „,. ,. ..40".: 4 . , , 1- -: „........., •,•%.2-=,- ., •,,,,,- . ' t 4)/ .. . .. (.0 .. ..'...' a :- .. --•. ; - CD (7-7 7:', , .. ' '11 ' , ,.. . ..- -., ,e -"' -7-e ' ''' . 0 -,- ---... ' - * /7, 4-:- .„A , > ----'- , F, F,„ ' - 0 „-- i. .f- t.. , , .,,. ,_, .,,,,,,,itt,,,,c,94,,,,,,,..b , ,,,:...„..,,,,,,:,.,,..,,,,,.,,,_., . I ,_ . . .. 1 '-. , ot 41,. _ -. * .,. 4 • • . . • • • 1.,. .,A ' ' x- 10411.; :7,., _ :1-0 •:•• -.... ei ..- ,.. .4:„./.... '''''' .....-- ..— / . .,- , 4--e---.: ". 4 :!lel. 1,,ik. If „ . . , . . ' ' 10*- -f ... 44' ° —I 7, v 7)... ":`,.-;-, ' ; I, .„ j • . -- 1 , . x -..,.: ..,,,,, ,-' .,,.:_-,.. kit. - -- . 1 a ." 00 4 • 7 . .7.-.. --0--, . , ,--- . .. . o -. , 0.--1 . - . . ....... , , _ .., ..,- v- .. . ..„., ` ...: -,. . ._ or ' ' '. .' 4 4,rri (-) '') .... ,,iti ,* -. ". .,- , M , .. , - ., . - • — 4 , - , „. ...-, t . - 4 ,. 1\.' . , ' , ''' ” ,---: ' 1 - . - ---, , 1 .,..., ..- ,..,.- ..,.,) . .. . r 1.• — A-, Ir., .4 -.•. .. ,. . Vi t 1 % ........ - ' ''1/4. , . , •-- - .7...s.t7 ....,,,i,...:->if, 4., -., ''. ., ---,4r`: ' % 4. .. jit-..„ 1., .. -- . , .., , 1 .-- .,,,,,r, . ...41 11/4 k,- . , i - - ... . r , _ , .. ••• • I . . ..., ( \ • \ _ ... 1 r Fri_ , ..:..1:7,i,, It ..., . ,.. , , . . „ . - M''' ) 41, • 4 .. H ,.. . , -A - , .. \\ke" . 1,, li.--:3,.., .,,f,,,,,.4.10 f„, ,,..,..:/,,,i, t ; ,,.:, ,„,.. ,,...,,L. ,i, - . ., ., . _ ,, ,.. . ., *V r-1 A KA, • ,_ . • - . , . .. ..„, ' ' - - -- ' " ' ''' -,` 'at : ' '4' . - , v t , ,4 ,„,r _ .,,,. ,, • , .... 4* F -- - ....., - - %. ... ..1. a . , . , ,- • •40, .. ---r„,--• , ---- fi _.., . '.- ,, .,„ 0°o o 3 1 f,,,q,'-,..l`.Ai t.•-,f4x..4-.6.A.,.r ,- 4A... .., ., . ': ixf,t:.,i,;"-);,.-_,,•'0>a K,s--. "1 • t s . • . , ,',-,-,,,,,*4;0.,'-'- 4 .. < 0 I cD 13 3 D'T al . , CO., , . `.< * cow NC -,'" ' — = * ' 40 ■-.. 4,,e ,..a =.o = < ,,a is? .... CI) 0".',St 'w• '....d. , ' ,,if/, RI 4 0 C) ihic . 0 -4- MOM .. o 4.7 isi. 4 :7c, ..:, 4 , = - - - . • g .• • , E x) *k...4% . . 9: ,.„........,....... a) . 4 ' +7 1 i s , ,, .. t . - ... = Map Output Page 1 of 2 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1 y 902144002 :°' 902133012 ,- --9645989301'. ' 964514208 '+ 964506102 -:- 9646°92°1 ` !- 964511901 .'" 96450950! 9646°92°1. �`, 902133005 902133405 902144007 964514204 - 964511601 902133003 954614208964512001'_ 964509601 - t ' - 964514101 51 1964511501 964509101_ ...,,, 902133010`' �.-"_c 964514101964512101 : 96450970 000000260 e''. 000000264 .:964514001 �r 964511401 ,° F„. . +3Q2133009 e 902144006 j X14091 964511401�, Ir„s 964514031C • 9645t4502964513901964512205;- ,� C 9464850501 w.—_ 954514601964513907 964'512302 V...._- ;`954609931'60, 0000402,, 508403 964518501.. 964516401964514601 `°'964512303 . 63 964 ' 7. 96451650x964516301 ; 964513802 964508803 964518401 964516301964514701 ` 9645„0002 964516601 964514703 ' ,90P242Q4S 9645183@1 964516201964514802 ;6 7, -4 ” /964518801 964516701 964516102s;..• ,� �c y 964518201 "964516101 902242006 964518901 964516801 .` x ., t 964516901 964518101 _; __ti 964519001964518101 ','964516903 964 5�03 964519002 964516403 :,..T S902231009 16903 7 747407 , - ti 964518903 902"231 3 � y�O <4 r 902231022 ?;_ 902243031"~, 77-t i t* + 004000260 , �9622143045�9�2+11013°" • 902231004 , 9022430321;" '�Q ,, 9.12243037 — ' s 902243038 9°2243°364 1 902231018 . 902243043 $ 902243046 w R 902231016 ` 902243008 � * a 902243048902243b39 902243042 " 9024Q a14m pru.ind try. sxo,County Lanrat ss ns GtS 902243048 r 902143113 2 Q0 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/30/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 954519201 941111'904 9fiA5[9R"' 954"40204 '959SF kbd? 984'.�L.YNM ,''•9645'92,1...•. 95155'.901 "96455!6'315 9fi4°JJ9'N)1 ' 9721391105. 964509603 .. y = r= -•••�""• 9'3.3,4206 9b15s 95 433003 902444006 `•. 969, 9649 420L `.•'• 9fri 1(19661 4645,4104 , 9543,350, 9 4500103 �� 902533010 96634410, • • gW50p79t ,' ...,,' 9raASFF504. :.,4569901' �1 .•90251,1(815 '., ,•i 9 415 5 9 101.•'' 'Y1'_-'I405 95450910/ C00W0'L60 S59F0}.' 964 . WJ2t33006:,'� 509701 ' 50000¢260,�, s..%r9641t2:03 ,964591904 •'S1Lbg0o2x0, 'r°r.- �.- 9023110 11 9646440}.• 9645+4091 , 96Axf'401 0i7,%802w of T ,3 002'.23003 96455224'. r'.-- -,'!;.•'' 9021]3009 '; �•' �i .. 9W0 4601 9W5122021544$12 !• 969.S4FNJF ,%••, 9[4509005. j .coma:ions - 964509003 964506901 ,'90216300e :�: /- . 96/419001 969S112U2 %""• ..'''•'' .�' 9640ix9Ti< /•002144(84: 3643345045 9Mx1 "1L3 ..95f5422C8•, ' f. ' .•, •. 9645C84J4 ',, e� 902513689 %g51400s 9645,7995 �.•96}s,t30i 9W5(AB32' 9N5096J, py ��., 6, '' i ' -'9FSt39g4 %'••9fi45S2964 '%f f ;,-:, 1'34+,49802 B4 0091 9e950BD0/..,°0E43089022 ''e 9:12•330.'99' / 9M5'Z'.i S2 964514502 1 964bU90t p °�5'166 •., 0.ry 9.330901 9&50x901. 961x34502 ,, /`^w' 964542302' ,r 066514603 ,• J6n5•96/964.513907 •' / ,0,3 00- '''—'"--7' 9i64509906� ,S•9645095+., j002133004' 969344601 •,.;; 2?68 0IXACO2SO 94'645,4605 -` ` .�' 9645' •e _ 966„2,302 454309904 96450x'343 yw r, 9345}6451«:.................._.,.,,,,..,964524x01 '' 9[4313501 964519601. 9'345!K07:::"...:•• • 034312303 964608003' .\ /; ''%441WOt %-r 9 543 4 49137. 904512'303 � !--.. .0646%20 i ,�..964314601 969653x0, 964x4360: ` 904900533 964314601 .. • J 000000260 . �9MSR4XIf •. • ..•.• 9643,5301 '.' �„ `.:•..•�~9fi45'.SBR2 .� .../ i 5E+I610002 964545104.." ,96454:4602 / %4554.105,,.. /` 9613,4701 9645'.6272':. :; 10;02 9646,6101.•^ 954514701 9645444,2 9,5935}2 „,JJJ�9WSSn�2 „, W15,,,,.. 9945,6202 1 /",�4 ...964390101 '9545461(43 SIf454ATW - ..'^96151]/'30 =.:JZaliti• ' 9x4516201 • 963514602;{J�+(44, 9045'6203 / I/°IXY;4\.Yi -�- _ 964586206 964546NJ3 y6g6t460494M5'nN�2 994111217/ .•9&5445,4 '`."964510203 .••'5545!610 F6.4b,4x03' 1021311'4'.,"-`° y. «wM�..' .�- -' 9643182M • 964 UMS• ...w- 964x46205 ? 9645 4515 8522 .-- 9x45SS204 954514VJE, 064,6,,. n' 0645,610 ••5,54.5'6101 964540X1296451610 . 114.56101 '''9r4xM104 ' 064544MF• '`•96039494,..', 9,,`2,20,1A`2,20,1A 964556601"-63'-•16301 'f ,'Y' .. - 90964~1694F ' 11, 1,•1485, 94145'6163, COG010289 964516901 r 964516905 //w4s,,6064 ,.06451531/'. I223 /. 9/003114202 90233'037 aagg 6<.=- ' - q(�t �q0� y 9ar',;,?0F .27..,.64,,t,,, 91322.11957 7 907193004 / I Y�2241ui3 _ Mssm4wx1543f to ,-00545,Car.Sre 50,3 141 641%'.`902245;43 T. 90224303,- FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the me collection.Wed Jul 10 14:50:34 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/10/2013 A • • -,) -i (11 > 71 --( \ . s ,•.' ? Z --,1 \\\ r 0 , t F 8 , i :;--1 , z,-, ,9 ,,,, 'I) r p Ic -.1 a , \ (') 6., -.A , ? -C' r r r I .? cr l' E 4 C c oN r r-- o c� Cm P p 1 . Cf 01 -...i ...i , I Q c r Cc G f 1 U I S I Z r%\ r . in- r -"._. +^ Ra -(4- • -2$ E c„- c(,,- .) G.) ,,.. -, (r, . N- -r i �. ' G tit, 0 t 4 rn c i � n I C r. rri I Il it $ 1 Ilit -'I 10 y' • I I W- �y - p 0 c Dr/ C., -� 'ti. -0m = � = r zNO 1 i ay - � of cA' �. , • u►Op 0 .. MI CI I \ r O .D C V Ir c z L 0 I B, -p Cy N c3 h ) „ a 4' •4 ` f0 J y• 0 NI 3 -i °o r o D 3 �.., cn o Z = � E ? ^� � *rye. N . z z ' ;gym ��� m N � _ GARDINER F f� t"' mom � — i y RD Y r A A \k oe ,,,,,,. _1 0,' t, - r* Late4 rr%svi„.:rt-044 ' .,- ..'... ,v4. loop,. Nk., ,,.t , -, % , i v -. V:. 44%Atr '' c cn M CO Z 73 1.,::(Z �t > 0 -, cn —i 2. , � cn / r Z � 'D r Cm) ri cn q ., ^ 1 1 4 l/ C. I \ c I Dm m 0 v L –< I Co) O i y Oti - l< 4 44 ,,I. / • T ` R, \ C 4 I- I 1:44'1 —-c47.--..------..1 ,i . , , , ,- m -al r \//\\ i ' c mIt a il ''1 ..,'1 ,'.4, 0 0 : :-:,m o —. � - ,_____o �D �- �C Li \ \ W_ O teA rri rn p o co w 'C — 77 m \ * 1 v � u --12-DC CONSISTENCY REVII0W— Project Planner: Master#PRE 12-00018 Review Type Project Description PRE12-00018 REMOVAL OF A PORTION OF WATER LIi FE, RE-CONSTRUCTION IN NEW ALIGNMENT, RELOACTION OF OLYMPIC U'SCOVERY TRAIL SECTION& RESTORATION OF MAYNARD SHORELINE Primary: STATE OF WASHINGTON -FISH/WDLF Site Address: REAL ESTATE SERVICES DIV 282023 HWY 101 600 CAPITOL WAY N WA, OLYMPIA WA 985011076 REP NORTH OLYMPIC SALMON COALITION KEVIN LONG 205 B W PATISON ST PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 Project Location: Parcel Number: 902231004 S-T-R: 23-29N-02W Total Acreagc 12 Legal Description S23 T29 R2W GOV LOTS 1 & 2(E OF SR 101) LESS TAX 4 Land Use: 9100 &26 LS PTN GOV LOT 1 BTWN SR 101 & RR R/W(RR R/W INCL) LESS TAX 34 AND 35 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM) Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902231018 S-T-R: 23-29N-02W Total Acreage 3 Legal Description S23 T29N R2W TAX 36 SUBJ/SLMN RECVRY EASE Land Use: 9100 AF#505441 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 902242005 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreagc 3 Legal Description S24 T29 R2W TL TAX V(LS SR 101 R/W& TL V-1) Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM) Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 964516003 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 0 Legal Description JUNCTION CITY BLK 160 LOT 7 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map (FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: Parcel Number: 964516903 S-T-R: 24-29N-02W Total Acreage 1 Legal Description JUNCTION CITY BLK 169 LOTS 11 & 12(S OF R/W), BLK Land Use: 9100 170 LOTS 1 THRU 10 BLK 179 LOT 12 Flood District: Fire District: 5 Planning Area: 5 Flood Map(FIRM) Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: DESIGNATION:ON: ) I . tJ C- ' A- COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans )1(140 tOiccroz [ ] Plot plan states "property line" Assessor's Map (Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the As essor's�map) [ ] p � P Y P P P P Y [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents NCE3 NO it. N /- [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby ES NO c r [ ] Designated Ag YES N , [ ] Shoreline Designation: YE NO p 1,',' a:, l r w rv-NnG - [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: NO 1 Y' r X rni(AA a A 4 � : c ;_ Stream Type: NO T , F CO&Sh' y cwv� Fish & Wild 'fe: E NO y rv15 A,1t,l-fd I1 ,r�/3 Wetlands: E NO Rare Plants:YE)S rDN C. k P -0--r\ Seismic: IS NO - Landslide: ES O /� \ 41/ (I Flood: E NO 67)p0ipq btfIf? — Erosion: NO �-- Aquifer Recharge Area:f? NO f�jhj SIPZ: none At Risk iig sl c �' /5 1ste J ry CMZ: High Risk Moderate Risk Disco / / _ « * wJ ,1) Stormwater site plan submitted:OesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO D,�l Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial, ' — [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO c-- i t t,c: te_[ Agricultural Lands: YES NO f fit �� reper[ ] Stormwater -,,��mo//w Impervious Surface - _ Stormwater Req s:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 ,476t9//ra r�i� 2 ? _ DEVELOPMENT' REVIEW TIME SHEET Date Time Comments k II JLAti ilik Jo -edit_ ,, '? -3o -- 1, 39,1,-,r cal. - �.' •