Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZON2013-00042 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#M LA13-00125 Review Type Project Description ZON13-00042 SPAAD-determine building envelope for future home and shop Primary: AMK PROPERTIES I LLC Site Address: PO BOX 763 1192 EAST QUILCENE RD QUILCENE WA 983760763 QUILCENE WA, 98376 Project Location: Parcel numbers 701 184 019& 701 184 020, Section 18 Township 27N Range 1W, 1192 East Quilcene Rd-Quilcene,WA 98376 Parcel Number: 701184019 S-T-R: 18-27N-01 VV Total Acreage 0 Legal Description S18 T27 R1W TAX 36&TL TAX K(N1/2 OF EA) Land Use: 9800 Flood District: Fire District: 2 Planning Area: 10 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: .chool D 48 Zoning: Parcel Number: 701184020 S-T-R: 18-27N-01W Total Acreage 0 Legal Description S18 T27 R1W TAX 36&TL TAX K(S1/2 OF EA) Land Use: 9800 Flood District: r Fire District: 2 Planning Area: 10,1 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5 1,0 6 (a Q 6 f5 i3 chool D 48 Zoning: EL ( COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property Y NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES N [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES N�c— [ ] Designated Ag YES /9„, [ ] Shoreline Designation: & ` NO 5 i t- vv. [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES f Stream Type:10 NO To pt; Fish& E� NO U yt e r1 Lt,r vh,Q, Wei,( A ' 5fe Wetlands: NO Rare Plants:YES N�- Seismic: 0 NO Landslide: YES N2 Flood: YES Erosion: YES T' Aquifer Recharge Area: E J NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coas CMZ: nom. High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES '.,9 Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES N,Y [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES Nc- [ ] Archaeology: YES N7 [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface (1tN Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ S\ADOk-1 0),X [ ] Notice Prov4ions/1 isclosure:Airport YES NV MRL YES NO/ Flriest Lands YES NC [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes Nei' [ ] Parking Spates Re red NO Other [ 1 Building Height: 5' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 5°/ Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building erage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: 6t(, RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:1, 00 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Q / Left Side: y' Right Side: 5.-i Rear: Shoreline Setback: '50 LSHA Setback: LI(L- [ ] Road Classification: \ adteXe, 77O' C`'J..7 5-08 Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEM [ ] Flood Certificate: y,A(}t,- [ ] Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: n/ a AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant 4.'NO submitted: YEjSI „NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES N$i submitted: • S gNO [ ] Site Visit conducted NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES N9. [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES No parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 701184019 MLA13-00125 ZON13-00042 P SPAAD-determine building envelope for future home and shop SOM70-00044 N SEP70-00044 N 5/28/1970 A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AMK PROPERTIES I LLC PO BOX 763 QUILCENE WA 983760763 DATE ISSUED:June 10,2014 DATE EXPIRES:June 10,2019 MLA NUMBER: MLA13-00125 PROJECT PLANNER: Donna Frostholm PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SPAAD-determine building envelope for future home and shop PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel numbers 701 184 019 & 701 184 020, Section 18 Township 27N Range 1W, 1192 East Quilcene Rd-Quilcene, WA 98376 CONDITIONS: 1.) The applicant shall apply for and obtain a building permit prior to beginning any work approved under this SPAAD. 2.) The applicant shall apply for a shoreline exemption for single-family residential development at the time of building application. 3.) The applicant shall apply for and obtain a septic permit prior to beginning any work approved under this SPAAD. 4.) The applicant shall implement the No Net Loss specifications in the January 27, 2014 Wetland Delineation Report at the time of building application. A building certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until this department confirms compliance with the report. 5.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 6.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 7.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 8.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 9.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 10.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 11.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 12.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 13.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5)year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.)and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 14.) Lot coverage shall not exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface, which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 15.) At the time of building application, the applicant shall demonstrate proof of potable water. 16.) The road setback is 20 feet, the setback from adjacent residential parcels is 5 feet, and the setback from the ordinary high water mark of the shoreline is 30 feet. 17.) The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) This Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) is for a future single-family residential development or a parcel along Quilcene Bay. This segment of Quilcene Bay is designated as Suburban. This SPAAD permit vests the proposal to shoreline requirements in Chapter 18.25 JCC, but is not a shoreline permit. The applicant shall apply for a shoreline exemption for single-family residential development at the time of building application 3.) There are two septic systems on this property. Both are not being used and per the approved SPAAD plot plan both are to be decommissioned. Both septic systems are not suitable for use with any new construction. 4.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. The designer preparing the SPAAD report offered a conceptual design for an onsite sewage system. However, a complete design package was not reviewed. This SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute approval of this design or system capacity and there may be other options available at the time of application for a septic permit. 5.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff for the potential presence of Critical Areas under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following Critical Areas were confirmed to be present on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (Quilcene Bay; Type N stream); wetlands; geologically hazardous areas(seismic hazards); aquifer recharge areas (susceptible); and seawater intrusion protection zones(coastal). 6.) A Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc(dated January 2014)was submitted. This report also addresses no net loss of shoreline functions to comply with RCW 36.70A.480. 7.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 8.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rap id infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 9.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. The Jefferson County Code does not require applicants to submit a geotechnical report for single-family residential development in areas mapped as seismic hazards; therefore, no report has been requested. 10.) A Type N Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) has been identified on the subject property. The portions of the stream that were not previously piped will require a buffer of 50 feet. The buffer shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have a 5-foot building setback. 11.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 12.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 13.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 14.) The site plan, as submitted with the SPAAD application on May 15, 2014, has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated May 27, 2014 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) This approval is for a site plan approval advance determination for a future single-family residence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 16.) The parcel has been designated as rural residential one dwelling unit per acre (RR 1:5) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 17.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan approval advance determination criteria of Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC. The criteria for approval is as follows: 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment: The parcel is approximately 1.18 acres in size. The site plan, as submitted on May 15, 2014 and stamped on May 27, 2014, complies with Jefferson County Code Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. This application is for a Site Plan Approval Advance Determination to eventually construct a single-family residence. Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health reviewed the application and approved it based on the site plan received May 27, 2014. This SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow due to the application, as proposed, will use an individual well. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for permitting. Application of a Coordinated Water System Plan for fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source and storage. The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water. Access to this parcel is proved by East Quilcene Road, which is a local access requiring a 20-foot setback. The approved site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070 require the applicant to prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion, and sediments during construction; address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction; and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. At the time of building application, a stormwater plan in compliance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington shall be submitted. If the proposal cannot meet the prescriptive requirements of the Stormwater Manual, an engineered stormwater plan shall be required. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21C RCW. Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four(4)dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 18.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments, are included as "critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 19.) Any removal or disturbance of soil in the area evaluated may create site conditions that are unacceptable for the installation of an onsite sewage system and may invalidate this approval. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. • iO • •mrrnstrator MLA13-00125 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_IssuePermit_U.rpt 6/10/2014 Page 5 of 5 B 6 m c N c a m * O m . . a K * * \ • WWg . 0\ I I 2 di ,,'„ -4! , • < O O O O 2 X CD W I "'' \\ m � 000 � ca� m � � 3 r 1 /' o � t '4'*, 4t < o 3 ma eo- � \ 3 oz >v Cl) o \ co m �► ■I -I -0 po W � �. o5 m � v • N m \ * � m as +,, ,� * * ni • m ° m_ yo `�6 xm \ �? a � mm . �Irr n.) 0.) 4� ° � � m O o = vi \ moo? o �, �, ; I+ v, m 'i 0 0 ,A N di. a \ii-i \\ DI 2 m 0. a ■I tn�!♦ CD 9 � ., �i tv . m c°i y I m ∎\ W z �D 2 rn Cl) \ 01 • /�^ N N N co z A \t\ \ V. p♦ A p \ \SO ' - 1;4+ 0 X = al . CA CC Jrz 5ei y ,,r 74 v P...4 e ,. ':fly♦ n �I�v t .�._ -..�,ti " V'J� v 444* v♦o !�\Y .wy , i d 0 d o l�� w V!\ ; A 1,,s.o.cn o 3 A 8 i---- •• \-, _l y Jh! ° ;iJifJ N O 1 \ ,` CT d E v — •r *AN EFL 5-,, o o = ta, ?,-, Nir \•1 * #:# —. 0 0 0 —■ A Cr- 0 \,,,„ ,,/ a) I 0 ca c 0 M ro m ° m y 4. e if,, � m c�D o a g � o ���■ /, ,, tie mom c 0) CD FD /..4•440, I,.O ���+;`►..la v° ton c- ° 3 •8 O m !♦ . ��i*d uoi �r o a m n �� *��� �' A p+ CD 03 PS2I O /' „ j I O (O/1 / 0:. i < N /- �a ••'` -7"...)..4•••• .. 5)••> 3'41 =-;>---, 4, l0 c c, J/, a o O mm0- cu -1 v m c v AA} a N �' b <. 0 ' "O (D mi ;93A.,, _ ^ m •�' aaaa D ~ Q 9 �' '� (i C7 0 co a:• n • /' a fy aaa \ 'O ro -I m w cn N T. -0 Z trl v -.(n N .O•. /OW ,' QS<: oa aaa. -• C N ' • ' ` O 9 ":1r4 `0 O =CD w .Ta. to -I) �D V) 6 Q c O_ O O V) ") y • 1- o Z .� p V O 0 � ° -1 * w C . -- F z 0 o - CD ° o oa l.0 � - i� 4 :4_ c {� m " (S� a • m ' fA p.. N a / " 2 m 'i,.,r =' m D cn ya g S -* < a —9-- m FD, O 3cX 11111 y cn m O m� iiii1 =' M • = A t= ° 0 20 i-ri m D o ! W ND ( :�i (D : ' O f CO_. = rn S n i u p ,92 o-0 7 m n m =1n c f Q °'caz y T � R o 3 c v O m ' m ? ^. Q V p roes Q O O �. ffl C:2.•• �' •p H -1.1:1 Cl2 I- O a < o A° ffc � fl CO � : o S'A. F ° o x �'• ^� ° a'a — a) N n ^ .+ o =_ K Q rn oD -I m a = 5i • CD Z w I -1 w� � , T o �HoX m 0 o oro a) D l y m ay m O 0 fir ` ) x N o Stacie Hoskins From: Randy Marx Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 12:41 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: donna-cases ZON13-42/Kittridge Hi Stacie. I have signed off the case, it's ready to go. 3) MLA13-125/ZON13-42/Kittridge—once EH signs off, it can be issued. !Ziam ix Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 f><.WC > , ,,i;» ><(:((`> > ((((o> "> e's., > ((((' Septic-=Permits Online (link) Environmental Health Web Site (4,1110',-,:pr.,.'. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: his e mad ai..�ca,a., it,e.;.-£t. ��,sir/attachments, is for tP c .. _ :.,s_ of the ,tte riled P rip e t s; and may.:obtain E y � confidential and privileged information,. Ace unauthorized review, uset,disclosure, or distribzition is u.e_".fated. Ti you are not the intended Eeinpa nat, please contact the sender`y reply rrtii:t canti destroy all copies at the crigirial message PUBLIC RECORDS Am No ICE. AC:e xss...? :..:.:. ,io address ha iii racenniii ey gain feiir.ififion County y£�.,n ll sa st4 z3 an;z io therefor€ .>� . �:.:z ?the <rt,31i£: f t idi stay l , mound<=t:fZr., .W.:;:. t. 1i.r.nr caw.Putbli. County moat mP., ar t ii<,o< t,i ote ntt.t,: an poison who<< l.s.< ofi.n.a copy _ tra_r. £ .tmonl f unk-stt r,r ..a mitt f >„_ f.<rime ander:t.is law,is lodinieC,112.`th From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 9:30 AM To: #DCDStaff; Randy Marx; Linda Atkins; Susan Porto; Jared Keefer Subject: FW: donna -cases All: Donna provided me with the cases that are ready to issue once EH signs off and fees are paid—see below. EH— please make sure to contact me or another planner if you sign off your review.We don't want to hold up permit issuance until Donna returns. 1. MLA13-157/ZON13-55/Steckler—once EH signs off on site plan submitted May 27, 2014, it can be issued. 2. MLA13-143/ZON13-49/Potato Patch LLC—once EH signs off and invoice is paid, it can be issued. 3. MLA13-125/ZON13-42/Kittridge—once EH signs off, it can be issued. Thank you, Stacie,C'. facler'ga Planning Manager,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379 4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 1 From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:53 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: donna - cases Stacie: The following may be ready to issue before I get back: 4. MLA13-157/ZON13-55/Steckler—once EH signs off on site plan submitted May 27, 2014, it can be issued. 5. MLA13-143/ZON13-49/Potato Patch LLC—once EH signs off and invoice is paid, it can be issued. 6. MLA13-125/ZON13-42/Kittridge—once EH signs off, it can be issued. These case files have been left on the chair in my cube. Donna/Frostholmi, associate PCanner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to noon and 1:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 3 la d CCD 7 n CL * p rD. i co 7 D. K * * \.\ D.0 oilHiv A co 8 8 \ ,_ ; ���,:7 ° JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH W ;r y 7`rN�NG�G= 615 Sheridan Street o Port Townsend o Washington o 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org AMK Properties April 4, 2014 Attn; Ann Kittredge P.O.B. 763 Quilcene, WA. 98376 Re: SPAAD, Case number ZON13-00042 Dear Ms. Kittredge: Jefferson County Environmental Health has reviewed your SPAAD application; the following items need to be addressed prior to health's sign off of your application: • SPAAD approvals do not assure a specific septic system type or septic system capacity. As a result you need to remove any such language from your plot plan, "OSS Notes:" section for example. • There are two existing septic systems on the properties. You must state what your future intention is for both systems. If one or both are to be kept there will be additional requirements. • You must show primary&reserve drainfield areas, include appropriate building setbacks. These areas must be their own separate areas, they can not be a part of the "proposed building envelope." • Show appropriate setback of the proposed septic system area to the existing culvert. • Show and label the two separate parcels. • The scale is not 1:40 as shown. • The plot plan must be labeled for a SPAAD. Remove references to OSS site plan. Additional fees will be invoiced for additional review time spent on this application. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of the above items,please feel free to call me at 360 385 9402 Sincerely P1444/ Randy Marx Cc; Suzanne M. OSS designer Donna F. Planner COMMUNITY HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES WATER QUALITY MAIN: (360)385-9400 ALWAYS WORKING FOR A SAFER AND MAIN: (360)385-9444 FAX: (360)385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: (360)379-4487 Donna Frostholm From: Randy Marx Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 3:52 PM To: Suzanne Martin Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Kitt Kittredge, Z0N13-42 Stopped by today, soils look fine. Have not reviewed the whole package and commented yet, however, I will need a plot plan that shows the primary and reserve areas along w/ building setbacks as a separate area from the "proposed building envelope." You should wait for my full review befor submitting anything however. Randy Marx Always Working For a Safer & Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((2> ><{{{"> ><((((2> ><((((°> ><{{{"> ><((((2> ><((((2> ><{{{"> ><»<> ><((((2> Septic Permits Online (Link) Environmental Health Web Site (Link) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. Original Message From: Suzanne Martin [mailto:smartin@cottonshold.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 6:20 AM To: Randy Marx Subject: Kitt Kittredge Good Morning Randy, Just wanted to let you know that the soils are ready to go for the SPAAD. Hope that you are doing well. Thank you, slm Suzanne Martin Shold Excavating, Inc. PO Box 178 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 (360) 554 - 0224 cottonshold.com 1 ICS I ! JAN 2 7 2n14 JEFFERSON COUNTY DFPT.OF COMM?+N!TY OFF]no^,^ENT Wetland Delineation Report for the East Quilcene Road Property Quilcene, Washington Prepared for: AMK Properties I LLC PO Box 763 Quilcene,Washington 98376 (360) 765-3640 Prepared by: Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3`d Avenue, Suite 220 Longview,Washington 98632 (360) 578-1371 Project Number 2117.01 January 2014 SIGNATURE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. 4a4441,e- ie Joanne Bartlett Biologist AMK Properties I LLC,East Quilcene Road Property Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report i January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 1 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 VEGETATION 2 SOILS 3 HYDROLOGY 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY 3 CONCLUSIONS 4 WETLAND CATEGORIZATION 4 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS 4 NO NET LOSS BUFFER ASSESSMENT 4 LIMITATIONS 6 REFERENCES 7 FIGURES &PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Soil Survey Map Figure 4 National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 5 Wetland Rating Figure Photoplates Site Photos APPENDIX A Wetland Determination Data Forms APPENDIX B Western Washington Wetland Rating Form AMK Properties I LLC,East Quilcene Road Property Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report ii January 2014 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) was contracted by Kitt Kittredge and AMK Properties I LLC (AMK) to complete a wetland delineation report for the properties at 1192 East Quilcene Road, Parcel Numbers 701184019 and 701184020, located in a portion of Section 18, Township 27 North, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Jefferson County, Washington (Figure 1). Field work was completed on December 10, 2013. This report summarizes findings of the wetland delineation according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Chapter 18.22, Critical Areas(JCUDC). METHODOLOGY The wetland delineation followed the Routine Determination Method according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region(U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 2010). The Routine Determination Method examines three parameters—vegetation, soils, and hydrology—to determine if wetlands exist in a given area. Hydrology is critical in determining what is wetland, but is often difficult to assess because hydrologic conditions can change periodically (hourly, daily, or seasonally). Consequently, it is necessary to determine if hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils are present, which would indicate that water is present for a duration to support a wetland plant community. By definition, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands are regulated as "Waters of the United States" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), as "Waters of the State"by the Washington Department of Ecology(DOE), and locally by Jefferson County. To determine the presence or absence of wetlands on these properties, ELS biologists collected data on vegetation, hydrology, and soils. During the site visit, one wetland was located along the shoreline portion of the properties. The wetland is an estuarine system that is composed of vegetated shoreline on both properties and a small inlet on the northern property (Figure 2). It is part of a larger estuarine system that occupies at least the northern tip of Quilcene Bay. The wetland was delineated using consecutively numbered orange wire flagging labeled "WB". Wetland boundaries were determined through breaks in topography, changes in vegetation, and evidence of surface hydrology. Vegetation, hydrology, and soil data was collected at five test plots to verify the boundary delineation (Appendix A). Three additional test plots were established in the upland areas of both properties to document existing conditions and to verify the absence of wetland conditions. The wetland boundary flags were measured in by the septic designer for inclusion on the site plan. The site was visited as the tide was coming in with the shoreline estuarine wetland community under water during the delineation. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 1 January 2014 SITE DESCRIPTION These properties are located on the west side of East Quilcene Road and extend to the east shore of Quilcene Bay. They slope moderately down from the road with historic homes at the west end of each property, and both are currently surrounded by mowed yard (Photoplate 1). A low concrete wall lies just west of the historic homes that functions to stabilize the bank down to a terrace that lies just outside the shoreline of Quilcene Bay (Photoplates 2 and 3). The terrace is partially mowed and there is a fire pit in the mowed area. The north half of the terrace is slightly lower than the south half and is un-mowed because it contains many old pieces of driftwood as well as a portion of the identified wetland. The wetland area occupying the north half of the terrace is contiguous with the shoreline vegetation community that has been identified as wetland. It forms a shallow inlet that appears to receive tidal saltwater when the tide is high (Photoplate 4). Much of the wetland system identified in this area is composed of vegetated beach conditions with emergent plant species observed in the water during the field visit. A seasonal, nonfish-bearing stream is located along the south property line. Roughly 180 feet of the stream is culverted and the pipe ends near the ordinary high water line of Quilcene Bay. A tidal channel is formed across the shoreline and the stream curves southerly away from the property and represents the south end of the identified wetland. VEGETATION The vegetation within the wetland is composed of an emergent community that is dominated by shoreline grasses (Photoplates 4, 5, and 7). The dominant species in the wetland include perennial rye (Lolium perenne, FAC), saltgrass (Distichlis spicata, FACW), tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix, FAC), and beach grass (Leymus mollis, FACU). There are low percentages of tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa, FACW) also present in the wetland area. The upland area adjacent to the wetland area is composed partially of mowed lawn and beach berm that lies between the low concrete wall and ordinary high water line of Quilcene Bay(Photoplates 2, 3, and 4). These areas are dominated by beachgrass, tall fescue, saltgrass, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, FACU), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota, FACU), sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella, FACU), and velvet grass (Holcus lanatus, FAC). The upland areas observed on the remainder of the properties is dominated by a mixture of such species as velvet grass, tall fescue, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FACW), soft rush (Juncus effusus, FACW), and common plantain (Plantago major, FAC). Western red cedar(Thuja plicata, FAC) is present at Test Plot 7, and at Test Hole 8, there is a shrub area that is partially dominated by a species of hawthorn (Crataegus sp., FAC), sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU), and Himalayan blackberry(Photoplate 6). The dominant vegetation found onsite is recorded on the attached wetland determination data forms (Appendix A). The indicator status, following the common and scientific names, indicates how likely a species is to be found in wetlands. Listed from most likely to least likely to be found in wetlands, the indicator status categories are: • OBL (obligate wetland)—Almost always occur in wetlands. • FACW (facultative wetland)—Usually occur in wetlands,but may occur in non-wetlands. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 2 January 2014 • FAC (facultative)–Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. • FACU (facultative upland)–Usually occur in non-wetlands,but may occur in wetlands. • UPL (obligate upland)–Almost never occur in wetlands. • NI (no indicator)–Status not yet determined. SOILS As referenced on the U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS 2012) website, Kitsap silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes (KtC) is mapped across the both properties with Tidal Marsh (Td) mapped within Quilcene Bay. Tidal marsh is classified as hydric but Kitsap silt loam is classified as non-hydric. Areas mapped as non-hydric soils do not necessarily mean that an area is or is not a wetland—hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils must all be present to classify an area as a wetland. Evaluated soils were composed of medium sand with cobbles present, which are indicative of shoreline soil conditions, in both wetland and upland areas. The wetland soil profiles have brownish gray (10 YR 2/1 to 2.5 Y 3/1) soil matrix colors with redoximorphic concentrations in one wetland soil profile. The upland soils were composed primarily of dark brown matrix colors (10 YR 4/3 to 2.5 Y 3/3). Redoximorphic features were observed in two upland test plot profiles but they were determined to meet none of the hydric soil indicators because the matrix chroma was too high. HYDROLOGY The wetland area delineated for this project is an estuarine system that is regularly flooded by tidal saltwater. The inlet portion appears to be less frequently flooded but is regularly saturated during high tides. Saturated soil conditions were observed in the soil holes completed at the test plots, and water was observed within 10 inches of the soil surface. The water table was at a depth of 10 inches in Test Plot 5 and was at a depth of 16 inches in Test Plot 3. The wetland receives hydrology from tidal saltwater with no freshwater inflows from these properties. NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps Estuarine, Intertidal, Aquatic Bed/Unconsolidated Shore, Regularly Flooded (E2AB/USN) wetland within Quilcene Bay west of the properties (Figure 4). Our field investigations agreed with the NWI wetlands mapping because estuarine wetland conditions exist along the eastern and northern shores of Quilcene Bay with additional estuarine wetlands along the western shore. NWI maps should be used with discretion because they are used to gather general wetland information about a regional area and therefore are limited in accuracy for smaller areas because of their large scale. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 3 January 2014 CONCLUSIONS WETLAND CATEGORIZATION ELS located and delineated one wetland (Wetland A) across the west edge of these properties that is part of the Quilcene Bay estuarine wetland complex. According to Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (Rating System) (2004), the wetland is a Category I estuarine wetland system based on Special Characteristics(Q SC 1.2) (Appendix B). CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS The JCUDC Chapter 18.22 requires buffers based on the three parameters that include wetland category, scores for habitat functions on the rating form, and the intensity of the proposed land use. Because the identified wetland is a Category I estuarine system, it requires a buffer of 190 feet for moderate intensity land uses (1 dwelling unit/acre). A 15-foot building and impervious surface buffer is required from the buffer edge. A seasonal stream runs along the southern property line with a section that is culverted where it runs adjacent to a home south of the properties. The stream appears to be a Type N system because it is composed of a narrow channel and does not contain features suitable for fish usage. The JCUDC Chapter 18.22 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWCHA), requires a buffer of 50 feet from Type N streams. A buffer is not required from the culverted section of the stream, so only the upper eastern section of stream will require a buffer. No NET LOSS BUFFER ASSESSMENT This project proposes to reconstruct the home on the north property in the same location and reconstruct the building on the south property upslope of its current location. A new drainfield is proposed in a mowed lawn area just upslope of the existing buildings. The southern of the two existing structures will be relocated to another location on the property as a garage/shop. The buildings are considered legal nonconforming structures because they were in existence prior to the effective date of ordinance codified in Chapter 18.22 of the JCUDC. They are nonconforming because they lay within the 190-foot buffer required from the Category I wetland and 150-foot FWHCA buffer. The property is also impacted by the 50-foot buffer required from the Type N stream that runs along the south property line. About 180 feet of the stream is conveyed through a culvert that daylights near the shoreline. The proposed site plan shows most of the site is considered building envelope excluding the 50- foot buffer required from the open section of the stream (upper,eastern section) and the land west of the existing structures (between the structures and shoreline/wetland areas). The exact location of the future shop is not definitively identified,which necessitates designating most of the site as the building envelope (Figure 2). The project will not impose any new buffer impacts and will have no impact to the stream, shoreline, or wetland identified and delineated on and adjacent to the property. Therefore, there will be a no net loss of buffer area and function. The proposed features of the project that will produce no net loss of buffer function include the following: • The proposed home will be reconstructed in the same location with a slightly larger footprint that will extend easterly away from the shoreline and wetland areas. Much of the area around the existing home is composed of mowed lawn with dense forest/shrub AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 4 January 2014 immediately north, which will be maintained as it currently exists. No native vegetation impact is expected when the house is reconstructed. • The proposed drainfield will be moved upslope and away from the shoreline and wetland areas, which will eliminate any potential water quality and maintenance issues associated with drainfield areas. Installation of the new drainfield will be in a mowed lawn area and will not necessitate removal of any woody vegetation. • The proposed shop will be moved upslope so that it is further away from the shoreline and wetland areas than its present location. The new shop location will reduce potential noise and light impacts to the shoreline/wetland environment. There will be no impact to existing onsite native vegetation cover because the shop will most likely be constructed in the mowed grassy area just downslope of existing tree cover. • The proposed location of the shop is also adjacent to the culverted section of the stream and outside the stream buffer. There are existing sheds on the adjacent south property located in approximately the same location. • Removal of invasive plant species including blackberry, English ivy, and/or reed canarygrass, is on going to allow native plants to begin inhabiting portions of the site. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 5 January 2014 LIMITATIONS The conclusions listed above are based on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our conclusions; however, this should be considered a preliminary jurisdictional determination and should be used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 6 January 2014 REFERENCES Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, 2005 Jefferson County,Washington. Cowardin, L.M., C. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-78/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services,Washington D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Hruby, T. August 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #04-06-025. Olympia, Washington. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2012. National Wetlands Inventory. Online document <http:www.wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWI/index.html>. Website accessed December 2013. U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2012. WA015 Jefferson County Area. Online document <http://www.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pnw soil/wa reports.html>. Website accessed December 2013. AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 7 January 2014 FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES I BLAINE 1 BINE WASHINGTON RND� ,,,,,,,,r, / RD IP PROJECT am,L,NGHAM WHATCOM we VICINITY MAP SAN JUAN C FR TE I�o�`LE�, w BA. SITE DA `° NTVER HARBOR,�MOU �SKAGIT cuLUM "TOED I•l N ••OFT ROTOR O Latitude 47°49'32.24"N , °E�° "' o rn m \o c o1 Longitude 122°51'6.99"W m r�SEN w E��E SNOHOMISH �p r c CLALLAM CY aC �j LOCATION MAP �°""° 6 > z 7 JEFFERSON °U LCENEA /, • w ©NorasN Y w s ►BELLE-Four DL ' >, cN oUEETS MASON 05050�'OOE IF NORTH .0).0 m O a - ROODS NORTH BEND LL U_ , �". 0 N rn Ra° w, > cYUc O KING' O C O) \ :RAYS >ir:104.1•■IiirtA,•ga AUBURN uw V N AC a.-BOR _ 1� R`uN< O d ■ N wn .� .R,o N 00 PACIFIC BEACH `"jr� ®,ENE Ov�r PIERCE C• CCI wEB��RT�:�� irp l TD N-NLE n,t.®AL o U R 1 W STON N oe 1 � RA MOTS �,CNE4-BOR O LEWIS � co •N oc No wiNLOCN P3 MORTON TI) I - • BAN `B PACIFIC 25 iLwrc r 40w�� CASTLE .' SKAMANIA.1111 LLCATNUNE=� cBOOS COWLITZ eRT.EN. N LONOV SELSO HELENS S O m O _ 31 9Q �/ 0 15 30 M m Z o H w000uN. u CLA•K H F N RIDGE R SCALE IN MILES '- m (� W NOTE: 'g o,-0 STEVENS. DONOR w ' N 'v USGS topographic quadrangle map reproduced using DR NBGNNE�LLE ¢ wc7 _ j MAPTECH Inc.,Terrain Navigator Pro software. R -m ❑o a U c CA S .".SN000AL J Ill Li 1 • i al ^' :' ( v CD 4 7 + \ \_ j1 P� X u.l Nmrn• M v CS o oo U j . / 'I ',\ N. ` �• ^ °1 )',) �i O!C1 I i O S• - II R E t : . , '' r i ) ,. 1 ,7c • r<`-, \'- 8M8i SITE� Y'0 Mid x • " -a t N . t ∎Pde o, 1 C � I r3 I. w� ( tL• o o tiig ch O■ Z N NN I( , Q w II i1cene 11 r I c ,. U 4, . t 1 fi° J N "(.. :1\ i Mud ;5•. �y 1 'I v \ > S r c.,�.q/ IN 1 E of ir.'. ' ,atNOICA ~''' I l ■ l l > m / 5 ■ C_ (0 ti 1 i i.;;i--ta c C gI:j!I (0 �.5 Z—D 41 11 .111 1� �$.6 E ,- ~ c�ip c N i8 tills O 8 of z m 0 - • ittilli I in 3▪ 15111 Ill/141114i a> li � � � .fi n � � co-' z W Y 0 N i c i g., z . .7:-, j .- . ,;." --, .....-: ,,,,,.,1-__-------. I i 12 I I 00 cc0. 0 0_ N: , ,- 41. , ,-; !- \ 2 Is f§ _ rn . c7i / ♦♦. ., Ili �g w ,a, ♦." a: , °` , ;•a i 118' IN / pli Fig ill v,411 veil c , m g a 3M c 41 N:• .„ : ,....,, \ At .,.■,„., \to:A , 1,1,5. i &- A A. • el gi L.,.., ,..,)) .,., `; .�. i '4 '� • oc n lid `` ,' , ...4� g 72 —`4 ro \ g g ,,,.. 4\ .. H 4.� ` ���, YS m n Li B I \*O , t . 1 i' 'ii I.13 S.. ■■ : '• .., U i S w` { ,I. , ■ ♦,$ o m 1 f ,hiihiiJi1 11 m , C ..- a w an'�. ✓ f-�� •04 3r 7=,, ✓ omr z lII " N c0 e a a E ? ,yr. '4r.. . E < ti F✓ re,, icti; :, 4,444, ....-.'"-5411.* .,_ ' '‘., ' "ktr., O cm m ,. gym _ t t. CD , co x' g CD■ SITE" K co t E ° b. 2 Ile, O N Ili Z Y U a w o o a a� t.�r .n� ` * Z o M-. _W .4-d � " „.414,.. � s N M W L �QLL Z v3 �ni Li u i 0 8,, Q 3 m N 1 J S J I O O W v o N f- L • I a t o i c0 LEGEND: N ,--ii KtC Kitsap silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes. Not hydric. IF �` o a o z V 0 N) w II J - U Q Q U) C 0 N a) > a) 7 iii co cn N NOTE(S): W E N 1. Map provided on line by NRCS at web address: ,1 http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ s i 1 . , ' ao 0o)w as.- c o> c a-•.c a) m CC ` ° v ° z se,) z y c0 lot) 2 N ▪ N a SITE T a▪ _ E— co Y 3 0 LL ca) rU 0 O ii 1''k.+5-�*1 (� . Y m U O n w w 7 m Z o N �' m� w `) 1112 N � E• ,;.' ,.2.--0.4 Li .., rn w v c u 5 f 0 - N ni O N rn to N v 3 Cn X 0 .14' illit .>, g v 3 co N.J Q v 3 U a p c m co a7 ci 7 9 13 0^ No mapped wetlands indicated onsite by US Fish &Wildlife Service. o E o '- LEGEND: - =11 o N • a 4 ) Cla Estuarine and Marine Wetland ED_ o Y I- t W N W .o L._ O a o z c N o W ��N z o _1 _ 0 Q Q c cn 0 CO a`) a) m iii 2 N co• NOTE(S): a 1. Map provided on-line by US Fish &Wildlife Service at web address: N w ,1� E http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/index.html co _ __. . . . . . . . . » ,. . . ° . \^ k §\ E / E& t; — c ca co 2 / o\ J ' =% #4 z f ¢2ce ¥ 1 11-2 � � 0 � � _ § c % 2i °\ a3Cy a a o Eo-, cR I\ \\ § : ° \j k \ P. co �\\C"® / @ co X G . 5 co-, z - .. \ } % / : »; � / §\ k > '47 \ \` § � dsa3^ f \ . ± \ f Ak ƒ ƒ § I / / C G \ o \ E f C / 0 / ) \ : 7 / i 0 } r \ $ T1).- C k \\\ g a 2 , c ) �% e _ \ \ ` � \ ) . R g _ • LO § . f E § » « , . i. a) d \,\ ) • I ƒ o _ \ } � w , (.1) ^ \ � ` , • ¢ f k >, + ~ � / $ e e 2 e e - / d \ ) '/ ~ ? & § \ c g '— » 2 e �� \ ( \ II« \ q \ \ 0 \ .• 5 / CI) r---\ . . . • 4 4 Z∎� , § ' «\ � 0 I- `� m/ » § yam% w CD . <w . « �.`elf a f. . .t, ; ', s T -.--.?W'' r � '' ;' e { Photo 1 looks down the driveway entrance to the property at the northeast corner. The homes and shoreline are in the background beyond the trees across the middle. I 4 :t ?°„! a !', Photo 2 is taken from the driveway ` _ as it approaches the existing structures, which were both historic IMF homes. The shoreline community lies beyond the structures. .4_____ Photoplate#1 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC, Project Name:Quilcene Bay _ --- ___ _ DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington 1 ` .. ;> Photo 3 provides a view of conditions on the upland portion of the site that lays upslope of the wetland and shoreline area The southern of the two buildings, which will be replaced upslope of this area as the shop, lies on the left edge of the photo. Photo 4 is taken from the same ,, location as Photo 3 and looks across the upland between the ' shoreline and homes, which in this �, 4- x� .� view,is mainly composed of �� � .- _� mowed grass/weed cover. A low : " concrete wall lies diagonally across - _ the middle of this photo. This low "`° > ,74.4.1,° wall provides vertical separation of the mowed yard areas in this photo. Photoplate#2 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name: Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I �. _- ~�� PRJ.MGR: JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington 1 Photo 5 looks westerly across Quilcene Bay from the same -=„ ° ,,,'''A'*"'-;'---'.- location as Photos 3 and 4. The :�r � �� �. � a.�P,; �ins : ,� �� .. un-mowed area represents a . section of the inlet portion of the wetland. The mowed area lies just above the low concrete wall. Photo 6 looks north from the same point as Photos 3-5 and shows the mowed area between the low concrete wall and the northern structure a corner of which is barely visible along the right edge of the photo. Photoplate#3 4.____ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I '_- PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 Washington Photo 7 shows the area of mowed yard below the concrete wall (described in discussion of Photo 4)where data was collected at Test Plot 1. Test Plot 1 lies at the edge of the mowed/un-mowed area so incorporates vegetation from both areas. Photo 8 shows the area sampled at Test Plot 2 (foreground), which is upland according to the data collected. The photo also shows a portion of the wetland delineated at WB 3 (orange flag just beyond the test plot flag in the foreground) and into the area sampled at Test Plot 3. The flag demarcating the location of Test Plot 3 is not visible due to the tall grasses but is beyond the WB 3 flag. Photoplate#4 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3'd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington Photo 9 is taken from the water's edge and looks back up toward t the wetland boundary and the areas sampled at Test Plots 4 and 5. Test Plot 4 is located on the upland berm and Test Plot 5 is ` located within the delineated wetland, which is positioned at the shovel. Test Plot 4 is just beyond and left of the shovel. The existing buildings on the upland portion of the site are 1 visible in the background. 1 Photo 10 shows the Test Plot 6 area, which is adjacent to the southern structure and Soil Log 3. This area is dominated by mowed yard composed of weeds and grasses. This area is upland based on the absence of positive indicators for all three wetland parameters. Photoplate#5 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property AMK Properties I �� ' DWN: JB Client:7— -_ PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave.,Suite 220 Longview.WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 Washington Mr Photo 11 shows the Test Plot 7 area where there is a twin western red cedar trees surrounded by mowed yard. Soil Log 4 lies just right of the test plot area. This area is not wetland based on the absence of positive indicators for the wetland parameters. Photo 12 shows the area at Test Plot 8, which is located near the southeast corner of the property. This area is mostly mowed yard composed of weeds and grasses, but also includes a finger of woody vegetation that extends from the east. The old foundation demarcated on the site plan appears in the upper left corner of the photo. Photoplate#6 LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property i 1 DWN: JB Client:AMK Properties I tECOLOGICAL - -- -- PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 Washington Photo 13 looks north along the shoreline to provide additional documentation of the wetland (to the left) and upland berm(to the right). xidit • te Photo 14 shows the beach berm that lies between the wetland inlet (left of the photo) and the wetland along the shoreline (left edge of photo). Photoplate#7 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client:AMK Properties I - --== . PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 Washington APPENDIX A WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#1 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825297 Long:-122.852524 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes® No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes® No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? YesO No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El Remarks:Test Plot#1 is located in the mowed area just west of the building on the southern lot. Vegetation data collected in the mowed(m)and unmowed(u)areas. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4, % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus(u) 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. Rubus armeniacus(m) 25% yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 50% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Holcus lanatus(m) 65% yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Phalaris arundinacea(u) 35% yes FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Daucus carota(m) 25% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Rumex acetosella 20% no FACU ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. Carex stipata _ 10% no FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. Juncus effusus(m) 10% no FACW ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. Ranunculus repens 10% no FACW data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 175% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? YesZ No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sand some organic content 6-20" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % gr sand % % % % % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of low matrix chroma and redoximorphic features. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#2 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N, R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825354 Long:-122.852560 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes® No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes❑ No® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No LEI Remarks:Test Plot#2 is located in the unmowed area north of the area sampled at Test Plot#1. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 0 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 15% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 15% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Leymus mollis 50% yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Rumex crispus 15% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Daucus carota(m) 5% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Cirsium arvense 5% no FACU ❑ Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 75% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is not greater than 50%dominance by FAC species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % sand ok ok ok ok % ok 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of low matrix chroma and redoximorphic features. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#3 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825432 Long:-122.852641 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:E2EMN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes® No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No❑ within a Wetland? Yes[g] No❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Test Plot#3 is located within the wetland area that extends south from the shoreline and onto the property. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. 4.. Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 50% (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. % Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species 10 x 2= 20 5. % FAC species 75 x 3= 225 Total Cover: % FACU species 25 x 4= 100 Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Lolium perenne 75% yes FAC Column Totals: 110 (A) 345 (B) 2. Leymus mollis 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.14 3. Distichlis spicata 10% no FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. % ❑ Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is__3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 110% ►5 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic I Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes No❑ Remarks:Neither the dominance nor the prevalence indicates dominance by FAC,FACW,or OBL vegetation. The area is a somewhat disturbed area that exhibits both hydric soil and wetland hydrology indicators.There is dominance by a single FAC species with FACU also present with a third species present that has FACW indicator status. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#3 P g Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10" 10 YR 2/1 100% % sand roots and wood debris 10-16" 2.5 Y 2.5/1 100% % gr sand cyo 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ®Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(If present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Soil profile meets hydric soil indicator S1 sandy mucky mineral due to the presence of organics near the surface. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ®Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 16" Saturation Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 10" I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology present during the field delineation as soil saturation with water table at bottom of 16 inch soil hole. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 II WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#4 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): shoreline Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825406 Long:-122.852875 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes® No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No® Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Test Plot#4 is located at OHW of Quilcene Bay and just outside the shoreline estuarine wetland area. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. % Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: % FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Distichlis spicata 50% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Leymus mollis 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Schedonorus phoenix 25% yes FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. % ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic I Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#4 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-16" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % sand % % % % % % ok % % % % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators because of the high matrix chroma in the coarse sand with gravel soil. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ i Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No CEI (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidencee of wetland hydrology in this area. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#5 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): shoreline Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825375 Long:-122.852968 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:E2EMN Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation❑,SoiI❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No❑ within a Wetland? Yes® No❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Test Plot#5 is located below the OHW of Quilcene Bay and within the estuarine emergent shoreline wetland. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 100 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. % Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: % FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Distichlis spicata 65% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Schedonorus phoenix 25% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Deschampsia caespitosa 10% no FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4• % ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. %° ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? YesZ No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#5 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12" 2.5 Y 3/2 100% % sand 12-20" 2.5 Y 3/2 90% 10 YR 4/6 10% sand 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ®Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No❑ Remarks:Soil profile most closely meets hydric soil indicator S5 because of the conditions but the surface layer is thicker than described in the criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ®High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ®Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 12" Saturation Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 8" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology present during the field delineation as soil saturation and a shallow water table. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#6 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825414 Long:-122.852210 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? YesO No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Test Plot#6 is located on the property near the southern existing building and next to soil log#3. Vegetation is composed of mowed grasses and weeds. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3.4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 10% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 10% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 50% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus 20% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Hypochaeris radicata 15% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Plantago major 10% no FAC 0 Dominance Test is>50% 5. Juncus effusus 5% no FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#6 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-12" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox cyo cyo % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of redoximorphic features. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#7 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825630 Long:-122.852017 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology!: naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El Remarks:Test Plot#7 is located near soil log 4 and at the twin cedar tree remaining near the middle of the site. Most of the vegetation in this area is dominated by mowed grasses and weeds. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. Thuja plicata 20% yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2. % That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3. 4. % Total Number of Dominant 4 (B) Total Cover: 20% Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 75 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 10% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 10% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 35% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Schedonorus phoenix 20% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. mowed,unidentified grasses 75% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. % ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. %° ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7• % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 55% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#7 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox 12-16" 10 YR 5/1 80% 10 YR 4/6 20% C M sandy loam 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to high matrix chroma and the thickness of the surface layer. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#8 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825785 Long:-122.852266 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El Remarks:Test Plot#8 is located near the east side of the property and upslope of the historic drainfield. It is positioned at the tip of a wooded area and the 1/4 of the plot circle is composed of woody/forest vegetation and 3/4 of the circle is composed of mowed weed/grass area that occupies most of this area. The old foundation is located nearby. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1. % Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. 4. % Total Number of Dominant 4 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 75 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Crataegus spp. 35% yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet 2. Rubus armeniacus 15% yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % _ FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 45% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 35% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus 35% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Polystichum munitum 25% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Juncus effusus 15% no FACW ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. Hypochaeris radicafa 15% no FACU ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. Tolmeia menzeisii 10% no FAC ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. Equisetum arvense 5% no FAC data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 140% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point:TP#8 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox 10-16" 2.5 Y 4/3 90% 10 YR 4/6 10% C M sandy loam % % % % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to high matrix chroma in both soil layers. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 APPENDIX B Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM—WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2—Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland(if known): Date of site visit: 12/10/13 Rated by J. Bartlett Trained by Ecology? Yes El No ❑ Date of Training: 4/12 SECTION: 18 TWNSHIP: 27N RNGE: 1W Is S/T/R in Appendix D?Yes❑No❑ Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I ❑ II ❑ III ❑ Iv ❑ Category I=Score>-70 Score for Water Quality Functions Category II= Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions Category III= Score 30-50 Category IV = Score< 30 Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL Score for functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I ® II ❑ Does not Apply Final Category (choose the"highest" category from above) I Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Estuarine ® De'ressional ❑ Natural Herita a Wetland ❑ Riverine ❑ Bo ❑ 11221112111111 ❑ Mature Forest ❑ Slo i e ❑ Old Growth Forest ❑ Flats ❑ Coastal La:oon ❑ Freshwater Tidal ❑ Interdunal ❑ _ None of the above Check if unit has multiple HGM classes 'resent Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. SP 1.Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (T/E species)? ® ❑ For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2.Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? ® ❑ For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cate:orized as Cate:o 1 Natural Herita:e Wetlands (see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? ® ❑ SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program,the ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 it Wetland name or number 1.Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides(i.e.except during floods)? NO—go to 2 EYES—the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes,is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)?❑YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification.Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions,and this separation is being kept in this revision.To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2.The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source(>90%)of water to it.Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO—go to 3 OYES—The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3.Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? ❑ The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any vegetation on the surface)at least 20 acres(8 ha) in size; ❑ At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)? NO—go to 4 OYES—The wetland class is Lake-fringe(Lacustrine Fringe) 4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? ® The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), ® The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps.It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct banks. ® The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). ONO-go to 5 EYES—The wetland class is Slope 5.Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ❑ The unit is in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 3 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number from that stream or river ❑ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO-go to 6 ❑YES—The wetland class is Riverine 6.Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds,or is saturated to the surface,at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO—go to 7 OYES—The wetland class is Depressional 7.Is the entire wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches.The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area.The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. NO—go to 8 ❑ YES—The wetland class is Depressional 8.Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes.For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides.GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT(make a rough sketch to help you decide).Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland.NOTE:Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated.If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10%of the unit;classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90%of the total area. ,a u Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional+Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary,classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number D D 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.311) D D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Figure Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=3 Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted,permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet(permanently flowing) points=1 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=1 (if ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Provide • • • or • • D D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) YES points=4 NO tints=0 D D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub, and/or forest Figure Cowardin class): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>=95%of area points=5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points= 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points=0 • of Cowardin • : =lion lasses D D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. Figure This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is>'/total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>'/a total area of wetland points=2 Area seasonally ponded is<'/a total area of wetland points=0 • of i"1 y, •• •,,; D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above — D D 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources,but any single source would qualify as opportunity. ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland ❑A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas,farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging ❑Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier ❑Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen ❑Other ❑ YES multi I her is 2 ❑ NO multi'lier is 1 D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 Add score to table on . 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 5 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number 4�y v ; ii D 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? t ;;:; D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Figure_ Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit is"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing Unit has an unconstricted,or sli htl constricted,surface outlet(I ermanentl flowin:) •oints=0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Figure_ Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 The wetland is a"headwater"wetland"points=5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 Unit is flat(yes to Q 2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of .ondin. less than 0.5 ft •oints=0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Figure_ Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class Ioints=5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity it provides,helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. ❑Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems ❑Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems ❑Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise multiplier flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems ['Other OYES multi•lier is 2 ONO multi i lier is 1 D TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on . 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 6 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number R R 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (sir1052) R R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments Figure_ during a flooding event: Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland points=8 Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland points=4 if depressions>1/2 of area of unit draw polygons on aerial photo or map Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland points=2 No de i ressions I resent s s ints=0 R R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the unit(areas with Rio cover at person height): figure_ Trees or shrub>2/3 the area of the unit points=8 Trees or shrub> 1/3 area of the unit points=6 Ungrazed,herbaceous plants>2/3 area of unit points=6 Ungrazed,herbaceous plants> 1/3/area of unit points=3 Trees,shrubs,and ungrazed herbaceous< 1/3 area of unit points=0 Aerial photo or map showhIg polygons of different vegetation types R Add the points in the boxes above R 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland ❑A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas,farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging ❑Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland ❑The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels of sediment,toxic compounds or nutrients in the river multiplier water above standards for water quality ❑Other O YES multi'her is 2 ONO multi slier is 1 TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R1 by R2 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 7 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number R 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? owe,.5)) R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Figure_ Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between banks). Calculate the ratio: (average width of unit)/(width of stream between banks). If the ratio is more than 20 points=9 If the ratio is between 10-20 points=6 If the ratio is 5-<10 points=4 If the ratio is 1-<5 points=2 If the ration is<1 points= 1 Aerial •hoto or ma• sho • of different ,• R 3.2 Characteristics vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat Figure_ large woody debris as `forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. Forest or shrub for>1/3 area OR herbaceous plants>2/3 area points=7 Forest or shrub> 1/10 area OR herbaceous plants>1/3 area points=4 Vegetation does not meet above criteria points=0 Aerial • • o or ma• show' • • of different ,• Add the points in the boxes above R 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep.57) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. ❑There are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,bridges, farms)that can be damaged by flooding. ❑There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be damaged by flooding ❑Other multiplier (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike.) DYES multi•lier is 2 ONO multi•lier is 1 TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R3 by R4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 8 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number L 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (sup.59) L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore: Figure Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m)wide points=6 Vegetation is more than 16(5m)wide and<33ft points=3 Vegetation is more than 6ft(2m)wide and<16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points=0 L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description Figure_ that results in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage.In this case the herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or forest community.These are not Cowardin classes.Area of Cover is total cover in the unit,but can be in patches.Note:Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants cover>90%of the vegetated area points=6 Cover of herbaceous plants cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points=4 Cover of herbaceous plants cover>1/3 of the vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in>2/3 vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1 Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points=0 .♦ w� '$ A.•. of different . ::r,'i .. A.:.. Add the points in the boxes above L 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep.61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water,or polluted surface water flowing through the unit to the lake.Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity ❑Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft ❑Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland ❑Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland ❑Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields,golf courses (all within 150 ft.of lake shore) El Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake multiplier ❑Other OYES multiplier is 2 ONO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from L1 by L2 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 9 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number L 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (step ) L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the Figure_ lakeshore(do not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland): >3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(l0m)wide points=6 >3/a of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2m)wide points=4 >'/a of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=0 Aerial photo or map with Cowardin vegetation classes Record the points from the box above L 4.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (seep.63) Are there features along the shore which will be impacted if the shoreline erodes?Note which of the following conditions apply. ❑There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings,fields)that can be damaged by erosion. ❑There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland(e.g. mature forests other than wetland)that can be damaged by shoreline erosion multiplier ❑Other OYES multi'her is 2 ONO multi.her is 1 TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 10 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number S S 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (sap.64) S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of wetland: Slope is 1%or less (a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft horizontal distance) points=3 Slope is 1%-2% points=2 Slope is 2%-5% points= 1 Slope is greater than 5% points=0 S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay organic(use NRCS definitions) YES=3 •oints NO=0 ..ints S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that traps sediments and pollutants: Figure_ Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface. (<75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>90%of wetland area points=6 Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>'h of area points=3 Dense,woody vegetation>'A of area points=2 Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>'/s of area points= 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0 Aerial • •to or m- • with - • r• • • e•• S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above S 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep.67) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants A unit may have pollutants coming form several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity.. ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland multiplier ❑Residential,urban areas,or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland ❑Other ❑YES multiplier is 2 ❑NO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S1 by S2 _ Add score to table on '. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 11 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number S 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough(usually> 1/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation covers>90%of area of the wetland. points=6 Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation>1/2 area of wetland points=3 Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation>1/4 area of wetland points= 1 More than 3/4 of area is grazed,mowed,tilled or vegetation is not rigid .•ints=0 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10% of its area. YES points=2 NO i oints=0 Add the points in the boxes above S 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep.70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. ❑Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems ❑Other multiplier Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam.) EYES multiplier is 2 ENO multiplier is 1 TOTAL-Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 12 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 1.Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(see p. 72) Figure Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is'/acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. ❑Aquatic bed ❑Emergent plants ❑Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>300/.cover) ❑Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: ❑Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have: 4 types or more points=4 Mae of C. dame 3 types points=2 2 types points= 1 1 t 4.- ••ints=0 H 1.2 Hydroperiods(see p. 73) Figure_ Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or Y/4 acre to count. (See text for description of hydmperiods.) ❑Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 ❑Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 ❑Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present points= 1 ❑Saturated only ❑Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland ❑Seasonally flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland ❑Lake fringe wetland=2 points ❑Freshwater tidal wetland=2 i oints H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. (Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold.) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species points=2 5- 19 species points= 1 List species below if you want to: <5 species points=0 Total for page: Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 1.4 Interspersion of habitats(see p. 76) Figure_ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1),or classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. c) D no o None =0 points Low= 1 point. Moderate=2 points ,N_ C:11: 1 N. /'....)r [riparian braided channels] High =3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.5 Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. ❑Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in.diameter and 6 ft long). ❑Standing snags(diameter at bottom>4 inches)in the wetland ❑Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft(lm)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (10m) ❑Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) ❑At least IA acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) ❑Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants Note: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error H 1.TOTAL Score—potential for providing habitat Add the scores from H1.1, H1.2, H1.3, H1.4, H1.5 Comments: Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 1 Wetland name or number H 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species?) H 2.1 Buffers(see p.80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed." ❑ 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95%of circumference.No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer.(relatively undisturbed also means no grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 ❑ 100 m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >50%circumference. Points=4 ❑ 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95%circumference. Points=4 ❑ 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >25%circumference. Points=3 ❑ 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for>50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above ❑ No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(80ft)of wetland >95%circumference.Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 ❑ No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK Points=2 ❑ Heavy grazing in buffer. Points=1 ❑ Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference (e.g.tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) Points=0 ❑ Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points= 1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size?(dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). OYES=4 points(go to H 2.3) ONO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size?OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? OYES=2 points(go to H 2.3) ONO=H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? OYES=1 point ONO=0 points Total for page:3 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number II H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.zov/hab/phslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. ❑ Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(1 acre). ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). ❑ Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. (Mature forests)Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less than 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon white Oak:Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (fill descriptions in WLDFW PHS report p. 158). ❑ Riparian:The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). ❑ Instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats.These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report.'pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m(0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>51 cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 m(6.5 ft)in height.Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 m(20 if) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat= 1 point No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list.Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits) (see p. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating,but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill,fields,or other development. points=5 ❑The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within%z mile points=5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within'/mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed points=3 ❑The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within% mile points=3 ['There is at least 1 wetland within' mile. points=2 ['There are no wetlands within' mile. points=0 H 2.TOTAL Score-opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores in the column above TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on p. 1 FIT Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. x es '..- stud N se SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(seep. 86) Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? ® The dominant water regime is tidal, w � ® Vegetated,and ® With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. ®YES=Go to SC 1.1 ONO Cat.I SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational, Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? OYES=Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES =Category I NO=Category II Cat.I ® The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation, Cat.II grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species.If the non-native Spartina spp.are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland,then the Dual wetland should be given a dual rating(UII).The area of Spartina would be rated a rating Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I.Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in determining the I/II size threshold of 1 acre. Cat. I ❑ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. ® The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands(see p. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.I Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened,Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D ❑ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site❑ YES ❑—contact WNHP/DNR(see p. 79)and go to SC 2.2 NO El SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? OYES=Cate.o I ®NO not in a Herita.e Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs(seep.87) Does the wetland unit(or part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e.layers of organic soil),either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils) Yes❑ -go to Q. 3 No®go to Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes❑ -go to Q. 3 No® -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND other plants,if present,consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes ❑-Is a bog for purpose of rating No Ill-go to Q.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the"bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the unit forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western red cedar, western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(>30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? YES ❑ =Category I NO❑Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands(see p. 90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats?If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. ❑ Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches(81 cm)or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.Two- hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR"so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. ❑ Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest)Stands where the largest trees are 80— 200 years old OR have average diameters(dbh)exceeding 21 inches(53cm);crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. EYES=Category I ®NO not a forested wetland with special characteristics Cat.I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons(seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? ❑ The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks, shingle,or,less frequently, rocks ❑ The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) ❑YES =Go to SC 5.1 NO®not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? ❑ The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation, grazing),and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p. 74). ❑ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un- grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I ❑ The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet) YES ❑=Category I NO❑=Category II Cat.II Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? ❑YES=Go to SC 6.1 ONO--not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula—lands west of SR103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? ❑ YES =Category II ❑NO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between Cat.II 0.1 and 1 acre,? ❑YES =Category III Cat.III t i t S 3 r e * g a ,t ,g .5, I:P e J*7,44 }'Y f g ,J j►��� �+g� 'xsF If yo ' ..,,� � tall ty • 6� . • 67.i 4 : k i, Select... Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 1 - Date ,Z - --3111,\_i l Additional Information Routing Sheet Sorg w� co Requested by JC Staff /2 �`U s/-ho / j -YYJIi V/i h �.- From: i Phone �Syrno"`° Check included? $ _.. Regarding: Parcel N,�umber n-C3 1. (6L"� I �`!' ii ij ' • O icj i 1,- �_ Address tlCA Z Ec,....,F- 00/ / • Case Number SEP Case Number BL I ' JAIL 2 j .n,,, Other Case Number/s `Zc-�y 1,1"— 60 -t u Ll This is being submitted for the following reason Submitted for the following Ap ' bii7s5"bricase ,, MUST check all that apply MUST check all that apply of Copies Redesign/Revision Septic Case(SEP) Technical Assistance (1 copy) 3 Building permit(BLD) 7* Record Drawing/asbuilt(1 copy) SPAAD 4* Monitoring Inspection Site Plan (1 copy) Subdivision (includes BLA) 7* Renewal Other case type 7* X Other(provide detail) L J *If Submittal is larger thane 11"X 17"submit 4 copies of those sheets Comment: LU€F OW/I Y-epov / it)/ -P(! !' 943 i I Wetland Delineation Report for the tEast Quilcene Road Property Quilcene, Washington r Prepared for: AMK Properties I LLC PO Box 763 Quilcene,Washington 98376 (360) 765-3640 i Prepared by: Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220 Longview,Washington 98632 (360) 578-1371 Project Number 2117.01 January 2014 1 r 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 r SIGNATURE ' The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. 4 Joanne Bartlett Biologist I I I 1 r 1 r I H' AMK Properties I LLC,East Quilcene Road Property Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report i January 2014 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS IINTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 1 ISITE DESCRIPTION 2 VEGETATION 2 ISOILS 3 I HYDROLOGY 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY 3 I CONCLUSIONS 4 WETLAND CATEGORIZATION 4 CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS 4 INo NET LOSS BUFFER ASSESSMENT 4 LIMITATIONS 6 IREFERENCES 7 IFIGURES & PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map I Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Soil Survey Map Figure 4 National Wetlands Inventory Map I Figure 5 Wetland Rating Figure Photoplates Site Photos IAPPENDIX A Wetland Determination Data Forms APPENDIX B Western Washington Wetland Rating Form I I 1 I AMK Properties I LLC,East Quilcene Road Property Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report ii January 2014 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I INTRODUCTION IEcological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) was contracted by Kitt Kittredge and AMK Properties I LLC (AMK) to complete a wetland delineation report for the properties at 1192 East Quilcene Road, IParcel Numbers 701184019 and 701184020, located in a portion of Section 18, Township 27 North, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Jefferson County, Washington (Figure 1). Field work was completed on December 10, 2013. This report summarizes findings of the wetland Idelineation according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Chapter 18.22, Critical Areas (JCUDC). IMETHODOLOGY The wetland delineation followed the Routine Determination Method according to the U.S. Army ICorps of Engineers, Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region(U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 2010). IThe Routine Determination Method examines three p arameters—ve etation soils, and hydrology—to determine if wetlands exist in a given area. Hydrology is critical in determining Iwhat is wetland, but is often difficult to assess because hydrologic conditions can change periodically (hourly, daily, or seasonally). Consequently, it is necessary to determine if hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils are present, which would indicate that water is present for Ia duration to support a wetland plant community. By defmition, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for Ilife in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands are regulated as "Waters of the United States" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), as "Waters of the State"by the Washington Department Iof Ecology(DOE), and locally by Jefferson County. To determine the presence or absence of wetlands on these properties, ELS biologists collected I data on vegetation, hydrology, and soils. During the site visit, one wetland was located along the shoreline portion of the properties. The wetland is an estuarine system that is composed of vegetated shoreline on both properties and a small inlet on the northern property (Figure 2). It is part of a larger estuarine system that occupies at least the northern tip of Quilcene Bay. The wetland was delineated using consecutively numbered orange wire flagging labeled "WB". Wetland boundaries were determined through breaks in topography, changes in vegetation, and I evidence of surface hydrology. Vegetation, hydrology, and soil data was collected at five test plots to verify the boundary delineation (Appendix A). Three additional test plots were established in the upland areas of both properties to document existing conditions and to verify the absence of I wetland conditions. The wetland boundary flags were measured in by the septic designer for inclusion on the site plan. The site was visited as the tide was coming in with the shoreline estuarine wetland community under water during the delineation. I AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 1 January 2014 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 • 1 i t SITE DESCRIPTION These properties are located on the west side of East Quilcene Road and extend to the east shore of Quilcene Bay. They slope moderately down from the road with historic homes at the west end of each property, and both are currently surrounded by mowed yard (Photoplate 1). A low concrete wall lies just west of the historic homes that functions to stabilize the bank down to a terrace that lies just outside the shoreline of Quilcene Bay (Photoplates 2 and 3). The terrace is partially mowed and there is a fire pit in the mowed area. The north half of the terrace is slightly lower than the south half and is un-mowed because it contains many old pieces of driftwood as well as a portion of the identified wetland. The wetland area occupying the north half of the terrace is contiguous with the shoreline vegetation community that has been identified as wetland. It forms a shallow inlet that appears to receive tidal saltwater when the tide is high (Photoplate 4). Much of the wetland system identified in this area is composed of vegetated beach conditions with emergent plant species observed in the water during the field visit. A seasonal, nonfish-bearing stream is located along the south property line. Roughly 180 feet of the stream is culverted and the pipe ends near the ordinary high water line of Quilcene Bay. A tidal channel is formed across the shoreline and the stream curves southerly away from the property and represents the south end of the identified wetland. VEGETATION 1 The vegetation within the wetland is composed of an emergent community that is dominated by shoreline grasses (Photoplates 4, 5, and 7). The dominant species in the wetland include perennial rye (Lolium perenne, FAC), saltgrass (Distichlis spicata, FACW), tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix, FAC), and beach grass (Leymus mollis, FACU). There are low percentages of tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa, FACW) also present in the wetland area. The upland area adjacent to the wetland area is composed partially of mowed lawn and beach berm that lies between the low concrete wall and ordinary high water line of Quilcene Bay(Photoplates 2, 3, and 4). These areas are dominated by beachgrass, tall fescue, saltgrass, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, FACU), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota, FACU), sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella, FACU), and velvet grass (Holcus lanatus, FAC). The upland areas observed on the remainder of the properties is dominated by a mixture of such species as velvet grass, tall fescue, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FACW), soft rush (Juncus effusus, FACW), and common plantain (Plantago major, FAC). Western red cedar(Thuja plicata, FAC) is present at Test Plot 7, and at Test Hole 8, there is a shrub area that is partially dominated by a species of hawthorn (Crataegus sp., FAC), sword fern (Polystichum munitum, FACU), and Himalayan blackberry(Photoplate 6). The dominant vegetation found onsite is recorded on the attached wetland determination data forms (Appendix A). The indicator status, following the common and scientific names, indicates how likely a species is to be found in wetlands. Listed from most likely to least likely to be found in wetlands,the indicator status categories are: • OBL (obligate wetland)—Almost always occur in wetlands. • FACW (facultative wetland)—Usually occur in wetlands,but may occur in non-wetlands. 1 AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 2 January 2014 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I • FAC (facultative)–Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. I • FACU(facultative upland)–Usually occur in non-wetlands,but may occur in wetlands. • UPL (obligate upland)–Almost never occur in wetlands. • NI (no indicator)–Status not yet determined. SOILS As referenced on the U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS 2012) website, Kitsap silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes (KtC) is mapped across the both properties with Tidal Marsh (Td) mapped within Quilcene Bay. Tidal marsh is classified as hydric but Kitsap silt loam is classified as non-hydric. Areas mapped as non-hydric soils do not necessarily mean that an area is or is not a wetland—hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils must all be present to classify an area as a wetland. Evaluated soils were composed of medium sand with cobbles present, which are indicative of shoreline soil conditions, in both wetland and upland areas. The wetland soil profiles have brownish gray (10 YR 2/1 to 2.5 Y 3/1) soil matrix colors with redoximorphic concentrations in one wetland soil profile. The upland soils were composed primarily of dark brown matrix colors (10 YR 4/3 to 2.5 Y 3/3). Redoximorphic features were observed in two upland test plot profiles but they were determined to meet none of the hydric soil indicators because the matrix chroma was too high. HYDROLOGY The wetland area delineated for this project is an estuarine system that is regularly flooded by tidal saltwater. The inlet portion appears to be less frequently flooded but is regularly saturated during high tides. Saturated soil conditions were observed in the soil holes completed at the test plots, and water was observed within 10 inches of the soil surface. The water table was at a depth of 10 inches in Test Plot 5 and was at a depth of 16 inches in Test Plot 3. The wetland receives hydrology from tidal saltwater with no freshwater inflows from these properties. NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps Estuarine, Intertidal, Aquatic Bed/Unconsolidated Shore, Regularly Flooded (E2AB/USN) wetland within Quilcene Bay west of the properties (Figure 4). Our field investigations agreed with the NWI wetlands mapping because estuarine wetland conditions exist along the eastern and northern shores of Quilcene Bay with additional estuarine wetlands along the western shore. NWI maps should be used with discretion because they are used to gather general wetland information about a regional area and therefore are limited in accuracy for smaller areas because of their large scale. I AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 3 January 2014 I I I I CONCLUSIONS I WETLAND CATEGORIZATION ELS located and delineated one wetland (Wetland A) across the west edge of these properties that Iis part of the Quilcene Bay estuarine wetland complex. According to Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (Rating System) (2004), the wetland is a Category I Iestuarine wetland system based on Special Characteristics (Q SC 1.2) (Appendix B). CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS I The JCUDC Chapter 18.22 requires buffers based on the three parameters that include wetland category, scores for habitat functions on the rating form, and the intensity of the proposed land use. Because the identified wetland is a Category I estuarine system, it requires a buffer of 190 feet for I moderate intensity land uses (1 dwelling unit/acre). A 15-foot building and impervious surface buffer is required from the buffer edge. A seasonal stream runs along the southern property line with a section that is culverted where it runs adjacent to a home south of the properties. The stream appears to be a Type N system because it is composed of a narrow channel and does not contain features suitable for fish usage. The I JCUDC Chapter 18.22 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWCHA), requires a buffer of 50 feet from Type N streams. A buffer is not required from the culverted section of the stream, so only the upper eastern section of stream will require a buffer. INo NET Loss BUFFER ASSESSMENT This project proposes to reconstruct the home on the north property in the same location and I reconstruct the building on the south property upslope of its current location. A new drainfield is proposed in a mowed lawn area just upslope of the existing buildings. The southern of the two existing structures will be relocated to another location on the property as a garage/shop. The I buildings are considered legal nonconforming structures because they were in existence prior to the effective date of ordinance codified in Chapter 18.22 of the JCUDC. They are nonconforming because they lay within the 190-foot buffer required from the Category I wetland and 150-foot I FWHCA buffer. The property is also impacted by the 50-foot buffer required from the Type N stream that runs along the south property line. About 180 feet of the stream is conveyed through a culvert that daylights near the shoreline. IThe proposed site plan shows most of the site is considered building envelope excluding the 50- foot buffer required from the open section of the stream(upper, eastern section) and the land west I of the existing structures (between the structures and shoreline/wetland areas). The exact location of the future shop is not definitively identified, which necessitates designating most of the site as the building envelope (Figure 2). The project will not impose any new buffer impacts and will I have no impact to the stream, shoreline, or wetland identified and delineated on and adjacent to the property. Therefore, there will be a no net loss of buffer area and function. The proposed features of the project that will produce no net loss of buffer function include the following: I • The proposed home will be reconstructed in the same location with a slightly larger footprint that will extend easterly away from the shoreline and wetland areas. Much of the area around the existing home is composed of mowed lawn with dense forest/shrub IAMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 4 January 2014 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I i immediately north, which will be maintained as it currently exists. No native vegetation impact is expected when the house is reconstructed. • The proposed drainfield will be moved upslope and away from the shoreline and wetland areas, which will eliminate any potential water quality and maintenance issues associated with drainfield areas. Installation of the new drainfield will be in a mowed lawn area and will not necessitate removal of any woody vegetation. • The proposed shop will be moved upslope so that it is further away from the shoreline and wetland areas than its present location. The new shop location will reduce potential noise and light impacts to the shoreline/wetland environment. There will be no impact to existing onsite native vegetation cover because the shop will most likely be constructed in the mowed grassy area just downslope of existing tree cover. • The proposed location of the shop is also adjacent to the culverted section of the stream and outside the stream buffer. There are existing sheds on the adjacent south property located in approximately the same location. • Removal of invasive plant species including blackberry, English ivy, and/or reed canarygrass, is on going to allow native plants to begin inhabiting portions of the site. I I 1 I I I I I I AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 5 January 2014 I I 1 1 1 1 LIMITATIONS The conclusions listed above are based on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our conclusions; however, this should be considered a preliminary jurisdictional determination and should be used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 6 January 2014 I t t t 1 1 REFERENCES Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas, 2005 Jefferson County,Washington. Cowardin, L.M., C. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-78/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services,Washington D.C. 1 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 1 Hruby, T. August 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #04-06-025. Olympia, Washington. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2012. National Wetlands Inventory. Online document <http:www.wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/NWI/index.html>. Website accessed December 2013. U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2012. WA015 Jefferson County ty Area. Online document <http://www.or.nres.usda.gov/pnw soil/wa reports.html>. Website accessed December 2013. I I I I I AMK Properties I LLC-East Quilcene Road Ecological Land Services,Inc Wetland Delineation Report 7 January 2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I E FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I auaNMn LrS BE cross WASHINGTON �° PROJECT ° `,",N�NnM WHATCOM ""E •SITE VICINITY MAP SANJUAN i en. SITE , NOSKAGIT Clw�uM env C oaE OoaT I':.• ARLINGTON OnaawcroN C O Latitude 47°49'32.24"N `�l" E EaE o c' v1 Longitude 122°51'6.99"W • ' " SNOHOMISH I aKs LOCATION MAP CLALLAM 1 C N CO CC MoN.° m rn 7 JEFFERSON • ��7,�our. w' -...r:,U YKOMS" +T' N ,s 1441111k, mE co of MASON ac 0 NORTH,BEND ii U m I +Ltl "000sPOa�•, FEDERAL m 5 C U C O P:nNO KING r C —) " Tnc � .usuaN U E O PACIFIC .RAYS 4 uv uMCUw 7 N f— c e •'BOR TEi COOS. , �:�LSV 21= pp N :,,,,z1 E v;\,RO OR E..c"r ouiae �' oceaNS it ®� ° �Gio PIERCE o o in R 1 W Oar : 'I `■l a",i Eat v E ae E. ^ THURSTON\ 0 O anrMONO plir:Tn'A LEWIS ROW N I - 8 1 P IIS Oxo" wiNLOC" MORTON ul RH ; PACIFIC E 7' - j 1,- T SKAMANIA m 25 ncoM.�" �o aocK COWLITZ °M?s�. o N LONO» KELSO L m O_ ° LAMA co Z 91 3B _ �0 0 15 30 M F W O N aoce • cE"CLARK SCALE -- ; m 0 III N. y NOTE: O F1 BATTLE ARSON F Z 0 O N I USGS topographic quadrangle map reproduced using ,c oRTMRONNE�LLE ¢Z w W x EY LL `MAPTECH Inc.,Terrain Navigator Pro software. m u < o o a U a 0 / U Ln• ti 1 ; z ° LA ci' z < ilri7,12 c ,... 1 1 ,J) a s 7a I '.. i f \ , (f)>Y c n �° .. • Oran�% a0..( c+ t,.e,ti (' ,�i.'y� _ •: ' ' W i O _co. I �1/ '� _ �l erg 8 SITE• CD 1 Y . I ,� r~ � _ ;aat d- D T s.l: • N . 1 1y{y�.ry; . J ,C, ' '. To- . k3M 36 . __ t r t j , e, - F- "'�'a o I tti W a 'Highjch $ y CD 4* k._- p Z N A.L .; j x o O 'QU3�CC1] �; ifs �I N J II U • C,tarot a 1 j 4� 1J I1 ( Q '1 �0, a� .•1 • • p+=r �I N t ,° .. =,,7. , , ` ,(Iy/////;;;; t. Z, �� —,- rt N - r r tt )t a <� 01 r... (t.>a rtt3.. ... r �iv,:1d,4,t 1(ttt� ,,I_•�U tF S Iu I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I c f co Jai ig § I I c rn &a ii i 1 I II 1 ilil i U 444 ;j b i ii : +!� Uli"y m gp N 20 2 TN zr, ea I q in Ai a �� Sao II li N itlilli I 0 ■5 1521e E li !I iligiArilA! ..-:-- ,, I `., v m O J''' '"-------''''''- % m z b (7.1 / -�, mC7 w in N a _� /� � Y ~ ZU' LYON ZS O / �� ! : o O a U a Al 1 Z 0 rn E ..---7,--", ./Nilr.\ ', . 1 ••` .\- � w , i 422\ ce N N l 0 ro m •` ,V � `_ � - 1 DES i� �t c 11111111‘ _cu \ ..__:._ ,. l'jj • �4 ;• UV , O In I,: \ 7. ''''.,.\\ 1"7\, \i'l t ; i.!.. I U rn I CV \,. ‘,77-,‘,..-.........a..lv ,, T ,/' .0 LI, .) 6 g..,2 .. .s.,,,__,•4,4 ,40\ •,-4 ;s■ • ..* I'\ • J Iv-1 ic ,��, ' ] N _i°III I � • g i Q �' � H .j o . .o • glilliikli b 1 I W Al - c., '3 'o u, E2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i . ' • a °t s der At 11 v, . J n m 0 as 1 r .� (, u" N O U m • up U `O 7 SITE II K' ty t ..a xy .r< '... ` .l, p a4 .r Es M m m Z 't ,;_ c� 111 Z .. 0 N CO 2 Vs 1 rn ooC -e' O V o q Z o cs M I N , �4 °i. ch 1�b`x y Vi V Cp.� ': 'N V O 4 m C LyJ N C V1 Y W 0 to N I �' as a 3m m _..sj.. 1 < a.°_' c t of m N F' U ,. cow O I J i O (!504) ■ 1 w I, co LEGEND: I r‘-(/)'71 KtC Kitsap silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes. Not hydric. w a o `o O a` O z rq r) w II ia J O Q U U 1 0 w m a= a) i `n N 1� W E I v NOTE(S): ,1 N 1. Map provided on-line by NRCS at web address: oo cn http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ S II I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I C 1):_,`, y c 0 N �T N CD SITE � m _ of AZ t9 a) Y C o 0 U ` 7 3 i + " . ' 0'St cs)1 N ti o s 4000,00,: , . i I■ "47' 4,4irilkwit CO C7 :i. " l LL O r m M F m� � p• Lll •• rn 13IP Q �Luce Scc E) z Li o 1-. _ m 0, i I v N ul V u co C ', If i �m� LIJ C � 301 X Io z �3 - m J Q 3 m d < u 7 m 'oi co I U 'I, p N. ZS No mapped wetlands indicated onsite by US Fish &Wildlife Service. w II r-: LEGEND: i r a 92 I N O • I Estuarine and Marine Wetland N in I— W ac.)) O .c,7 d � N z O II J - 0 o U Q U I cn 0 ur a) a) `fi N rn NOTE(S): ' w E v 1. Map provided on-line by US Fish &Wildlife Service at web address: 111 N http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/index.html c s I 1 1 1 1 I I • f Io ±' a= o crn in I L1.1 �� Z F— in a)'1011 w 3 c N U O O c M O co U 4 .4„p..,. -. 3 O • (� I1 40 z I LL GeC V N.cn ate\ \ N m O N (� C) (fl' m 16 O_• - mC7 W o H C7 -, L O N Cr) w aa) E oo � a � a O N c Li > U , E z o a, N O W CO 0 ; C 7 .(n \ I +=.,= W i v LO rn O c X \ / CNN6 N W // LL ❑ 7 a,CO ar,¢ 3 r I 12 m C Q v> i c U m rnro CD A V c U O -J^ 111 a 7 R Q ID J N L m o I d CIS a = • N Y W n Z Z _ E W Z r � m W o O I a` W � o co o Z cp i o I I c L' (� fn w v E con Q Cfl 0 Q S O ca U i ! .. 12 m L o 0 _O co cz Z O c 0 co W co Om a) m 19 a) O Il a q 'vi J lo M co ari v ry c ` W Q N iN3fx4 � r� z r N 1 CO 1 t t 1 1 1 1 I I I i eF."Al*. rye•.. t �, • ...,1 , ; z i Photo 1 looks down the driveway I V entrance to the property at the .r. northeast corner. The homes and shoreline are in the background I beyond the trees across the middle. . Y 'b i j .,hie _ s I ar _ . . ,... ...„,,, `�• , .. .; e Photo 2 is taken from the driveway as it approaches the existing ' structures, which were both historic homes. The shoreline community mom` lies beyond the structures. — - I I I I I Photoplate#1 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE: 12/11/13 Project Name: Quilcene Bay �------__ _ Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I T� __ " " PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 Washington I 1 1 I i 1 1 ,,„ Photo 3 provides a view of conditions on the upland portion of the site that lays upslope of the wetland and shoreline area. The southern of the two buildings, which will be replaced upslope of this area as the shop, lies on the 1 left edge of the photo. " ";: i Photo 4 is taken from the same xx: r location as Photo 3 and looks 1 across the upland between the ;. 1, shoreline and homes, which in this . ` x °'` view,is mainly composed of ' * mowed grass/weed cover. A low 117-4424— A concrete wall lies diagonally across the middle of this photo. This low wall provides vertical separation of the mowed yard areas in this photo. 1 1 Photoplate#2 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE: 12/11/13 Project NaPme:rop Qerty uilcene Bay DWN: JB Client: •AMK Properties I LLC 1 1157 3`d Ave. Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PRO#G2 7B01 Jefferson County, Washington (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 Photo 5 looks westerly across Quilcene Bay from the same location as Photos 3 and 4. The 4` ` * 4 un-mowed area represents a I ..;: section of the inlet portion of the wetland. The mowed area lies just above the low concrete wall. I I 1 Photo 6 looks north from the same point as Photos 3-5 and shows the mowed area between the low ` concrete wall and the northern structure a corner of which is I barely visible along the right edge of the photo. I I I I I Photoplate#3 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name: Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I PRJ.MGR: JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,`WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I Photo 7 shows the area of ._# mowed yard below the concrete wall (described in discussion of Photo 4) where data was collected at Test Plot 1. Test Plot I 1 lies at the edge of the mowed/un-mowed area so incorporates vegetation from both iareas. I :o' Photo 8 shows the area sampled at Test Plot 2 (foreground), which is A .b upland according to the data I collected. The photo also shows a portion of the wetland delineated at WB 3 (orange flag just beyond the I test plot flag in the foreground) and into the area sampled at Test Plot 3. The flag demarcating the location I of Test Plot 3 is not visible due to the tall grasses but is beyond the ��,. WB 3 flag. I I I I Photoplate#4 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name: Quilcene Bay K_- DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I PRJ.MGR: JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#: 2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington I I I Photo 9 is taken from the water's edge and looks back up toward the wetland boundary and the areas sampled at Test Plots 4 and 5. Test Plot 4 is located on the upland berm and Test Plot 5 is located within the delineated wetland, which is positioned at the shovel. Test Plot 4 is just beyond and left of the shovel. The existing buildings on the upland portion of the site are visible in the background. 's t , Photo 10 shows the Test Plot 6 VI �� area, which is adjacent to the southern structure and Soil Log 3. - This area is dominated by mowed yard composed of weeds and grasses. This area is upland based on the absence of positive indicators for all three wetland parameters. 1 I I Photoplate#5 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name:Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property - DWN: JB Client:AMK Properties I i PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3rd Ave Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I q. 4 .m 1,4 ir4VF INK a _� , ,�- - Photo 11 shows the Test Plot 7 —,, _ a" °' area where there is a twin western red cedar trees surrounded by mowed yard. Soil Log 4 lies just right of the test plot area. This area is not wetland based on the absence of positive indicators for the wetland parameters. 1 1 Photo 12 shows the area at Test Plot 8, which is located near the I southeast corner of the property. This area is mostly mowed yard composed of weeds and grasses, but also includes a finger of woody vegetation that extends from the east. The old foundation ' demarcated on the site plan appears in the upper left corner of the photo. 1 Photoplate#6 r ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name: Quilcene Bay DATE: 12/11/13 Property DWN: JB Client AMK Properties I -- , - --- -- PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave.,Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington t 1 1 1 I I . M; v Photo 13 looks north along the I shoreline to provide additional documentation of the wetland (to the left) and upland berm (to the Iright). II , 1 IPhoto 14 shows the beach berm that lies between the wetland inlet (left of the photo) and the wetland along the shoreline (left edge of „, = . }-. photo). I I I I Photoplate#7 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. Project Name: Quilcene Bay _ _ DATE: 12/11/13 Property _ DWN: JB Client: AMK Properties I i -� - s PRJ.MGR:JB LLC 1157 3`d Ave Suite 220 Longview,WA 98632 PROJ.#:2117.01 Jefferson County, (360)578-1371 Fax: (360)414-9305 Washington I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � APPENDIX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#1 ii Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825297 Long:-122.852524 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) IAre Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology': naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No within a Wetland? Yes❑ No® Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El IRemarks:Test Plot#1 is located in the mowed area just west of the building on the southern lot. Vegetation data collected in the mowed(m)and unmowed(u)areas. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status , 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) , 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) I Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus(u) 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet I 2. Rubus armeniacus(m) 25% yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: 50% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Holcus lanatus(m) 65% yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Phalaris arundinacea(u) 35% yes FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= I 3. Daucus carota(m) 25% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Rumex acetosella 20% no FACU ►5 Dominance Test is>50% 5. Carex stipata 10% no FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. Juncus effusus(m) 10% no FACW ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting I7. Ranunculus repens 10% no FACW data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 175% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic I Vegetation I %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 r i 0 1 1 1 i I SOIL Sampling Point:TP#1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks I 0-6" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sand some organic content 6-20" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % gr sand % ok % % % I 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface F7 ( ) s Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of low matrix chroma and redoximorphic features. I IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) El ❑Water Stained Leaves Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) I ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No Ig ii (Includes Capillary fringe) llDescribe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: iRemarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 t 0 1 1 1 1 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#2 Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM ILandform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825354 Long:-122.852560 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes[E] No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes❑ No® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No 0 Remarks:Test Plot#2 is located in the unmowed area north of the area sampled at Test Plot#1. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1, % Number of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) II Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 0 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 15% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet I 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: 15% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Leymus mo//is 50% yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Rumex crispus 15% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Daucus carota(m) 5% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Cirsium arvense 5% no FACU ❑ Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' I 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 75% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is not greater than 50%dominance by FAC species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SOIL Sampling Point:TP#2 I Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks I 0-16" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % sand ok% % ok % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ID Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) I ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? YesO No® Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of low matrix chroma and redoximorphic features. 1 IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) 0 Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ID Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants D1 (LRR A ( )( ) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there was no evidence of wetland hydrology. I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#3 I Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825432 Long:-122.852641 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:E2EMN IAre climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation 0,SoiI❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Spill:, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. IHydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No❑ within a Wetland? Yes® No❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No El IRemarks:Test Plot#3 is located within the wetland area that extends south from the shoreline and onto the property. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet I Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status 1• % Number of Dominant Species 1 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % I 4. % Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 50% (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC I 1• % Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3 % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species 10 x 2= 20 I 5• % FAC species 75 x 3= 225 Total Cover: % FACU species 25 x 4= 100 Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Lolium perenne 75% yes FAC Column Totals: 110 (A) 345 (B) I 2. Leymus morns 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.14 3. Distichlis spicata 10% no FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 % ❑ Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' I 7. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) . % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 110% ® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1 % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2 % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation I Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Neither the dominance nor the prevalence indicates dominance by FAC, FACW,or OBL vegetation. The area is a somewhat disturbed area that exhibits both hydric soil and wetland hydrology indicators.There is dominance by a single FAC species with FACU also present with a third ' species present that has FACW indicator status. 1 I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I SOIL Sampling Point:TP#3 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks I 0-10" 10 YR 2/1 100% % sand roots and wood debris 10-16" 2.5 Y 2.5/1 100% % gr sand % % % % I % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ID Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) I ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ®Sandy Mucky Minerals(51) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes NoD Remarks:Soil profile meets hydric soil indicator S1 sandy mucky mineral due to the presence of organics near the surface. IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) 0 Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ®Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑ Iron Deposits(B5) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 16" Saturation Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 10" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ (Includes Capillary fringe) IDescribe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology present during the field delineation as soil saturation with water table at bottom of 16 inch soil hole. 1 I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#4 I Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): shoreline Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825406 Long:-122.852875 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL IAre climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes® No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology!: naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. IHydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El Remarks:Test Plot#4 is located at OHW of Quilcene Bay and just outside the shoreline estuarine wetland area. 1 VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1• % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) ITotal Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC I 1. % Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5• % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: % FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Distichlis spicata 50% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Leymus mollis 25% yes FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= I 3. Schedonorus phoenix 25% yes FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 % ►Z� Dominance Test is>50% 5. % 0 Prevalence Index is<_3. 1 0 I 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2 % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes NoD Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SOIL Sampling Point:TP#4 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks ' 0-16" 2.5 Y 3/3 100% % sand ok% ok ok % III ok ok % % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) I ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(Si) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? YesO No 111 Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators because of the high matrix chroma in the coarse sand with gravel soil. IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) El Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ID ❑Iron Deposits(B5) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No CEI I (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidencee of wetland hydrology in this area. I 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#5 I Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): shoreline Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825375 Long:-122.852968 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:E2EMN I Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?YesZ No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes® No❑ within a Wetland? Yes® No❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ IIIRemarks:Test Plot#5 is located below the OHW of Quilcene Bay and within the estuarine emergent shoreline wetland. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1, % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % 4. % Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) ITotal Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC 1. % Prevalence Index worksheet I 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: % FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Distichlis spicata 65% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Schedonorus phoenix 25% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= I 3. Deschampsia caespitosa 10% no FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. % ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting I 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic I Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % � Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SOIL P 9 Point:TP#5 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Sampling Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks ' 0-12" 2.5 Y 3/2 100% % sand 12-20" 2.5 Y 3/2 90% 10 YR 4/6 10% sand % % % I % % % I % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ®Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I El Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) I ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(If present): I Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No❑ Remarks:Soil profile most closely meets hydric soil indicator S5 because of the conditions but the surface layer is thicker than described 1 in the criterion. IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) 0 Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ®High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ID Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) I ❑Iron Deposits(B5) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 12" Saturation Present? Yes® No❑ Depth(Inches): 8" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes® No❑ (Includes Capillary fringe) IDescribe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology present during the field delineation as soil saturation and a shallow water table. I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#6 I Investigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Datum: Go Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825414 Long:-122.852210 ogle Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL IAre climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology': naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El IRemarks:Test Plot#6 is located on the property near the southern existing building and next to soil log#3. Vegetation is composed of mowed grasses and weeds. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1. % Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2 % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. % I 4. % Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) Total Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 67 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 10% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: 10% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 50% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus 20% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Hypochaeris radicata 15% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Plantago major 10% no FAC ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. Juncu s effu sus 5% no FACW ❑ Prevalence Index is__3.0' 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 100% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic II Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? Yes No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I 1 I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SOIL Sampling Point:TP#6 I Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks I 0-12" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox ok ok % % % % % % 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to lack of redoximorphic features. 111 IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ' ❑Water Marks(B1) 12 Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) I ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) El FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes El No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No (Includes Capillary fringe) IDescribe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region IProject/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#7 IInvestigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825630 Long:-122.852017 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kitsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes NoD (If no,explain Remarks.) IAre Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?Yes No❑ Are Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology!: naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No El IRemarks:Test Plot#7 is located near soil log 4 and at the twin cedar tree remaining near the middle of the site. Most of the vegetation in this area is dominated by mowed grasses and weeds. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1. Thuja plicate 20% yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2 % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. 4. % Total Number of Dominant 4 (B) ITotal Cover: 20% Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 75 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Rubus armeniacus 10% yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet 2. % Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= 5. % FAC species x 3= I Total Cover: 10% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 35% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Schedonorus phoenix 20% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 1 3. mowed,unidentified grasses 75% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. % ® Dominance Test is>50% 5. % ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' I 6. % ❑ Morphological Adaptations'(Providing supporting 7. % data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 55% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1, % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Present? Yes® No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SOIL III Sampling Point:TP#7 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks I 0-12" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox 12-16" 10 YR 5/1 80% 10 YR 4/6 20% C M sandy loam % % % % % I 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) El Parent Material El Hydrogen Histic(A3) El Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) El Black Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ID Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology Restrictive Layer(if present): Y ogy must be present 1 Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No® Remarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to high matrix chroma and the thickness of the surface layer. IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) El ❑Water Stained Leaves Surface Water(Al) 0 Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Water Marks(B1) El Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) I ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) El or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes El No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No IE I (Includes Capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Region IProject/Site: 1192 East Quilcene Road City/County:Quilcene/Jefferson Sampling Date:12/10/2013 Applicant/Owner:AMK Properties I LLC State:WA Sampling Point:TP#8 IInvestigator(s):J.Bartlett Section,Township,Range: S 18,T 27 N,R 1 WWM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief:Convex Slope(%):10% Subregion(LRR):LRR A Lat: 47.825785 Long:-122.852266 Datum: Google Earth Soil Map Unit Name: Kltsap silt loam,0-15%slopes(KtC) NWI classification:UPL Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YesN No❑ (If no,explain Remarks.) IAre Vegetation 0,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ significantly disturbed? Area"Normal Circumstances"present?YesN No❑ Are Vegetation❑,Soil❑, or Hydrology❑ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes N No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soils Present? Yes❑ No® within a Wetland? Yes❑ No® Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No I Remarks:Test Plot#8 is located near the east side of the property and upslope of the historic drainfield. It is positioned at the tip of a wooded area and the 1/4 of the plot circle is composed of woody/forest vegetation and 3/4 of the circle is composed of mowed weed/grass area that occupies most of this area. The old foundation is located nearby. IVEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %Cover Species? Status I 1. % Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2. % That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. ok 4. % Total Number of Dominant 4 (B) ITotal Cover: % Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species 75 (NB) Sapling/Shrub Stratum That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC 1. Crataegus spp. 35% yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet I 2. Rubus armeniacus 15% yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. % OBL species x 1= 4. % FACW species x 2= I 5. % FAC species x 3= Total Cover: 45% FACU species x 4= Herb Stratum I UPL species x 5= 1. Ranunculus repens 35% yes FACW Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Holcus lanatus 35% yes FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= I 3. Polystichum munitum 25% no FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Juncus effusus 15% no FACW N Dominance Test is>50% 5. Hypochaeris radicata 15% no FACU ❑ Prevalence Index is<_3.0' I 6. Tolmeia menzeisii 10% no FAC ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Providing supporting 7. Equisetum arvense 5% no FAC data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. % ❑ Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' Total Cover: 140% ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum I 1. % 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology 2. % Must be present. Total Cover: % Hydrophytic I I Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % I Present? YesN No❑ Remarks:Dominance test indicates there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC and FACW species. I I I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 1 1 I SOIL IProfile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Sampling Point:TP#8 Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10" 10 YR 2/2 100% % sandy loam no redox 10-16" 2.5 Y 4/3 90% 10 YR 4/6 10% C M sandy loam % % % I % % % 1 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A3) 0 Stripped Matrix(S6) 0 Red Parent Material ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ID Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑Sandy Mucky Minerals(Si) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) Wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer(if present): 1 Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No® IRemarks:Soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators due to high matrix chroma in both soil layers. IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I Primary Indicators(any one indicator is sufficient) ❑Water Stained Leaves ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except NW coast) ❑Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) ❑High Water Table(A2) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Oxidized Rhizoshperes along Living Roots(C3) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D2) ❑Algal Mat or crust(B4) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D4) I ❑Iron Deposits(B5) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) I Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): Saturation Present? Yes❑ No® Depth(Inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes❑ No IEI (Includes Capillary fringe) IDescribe Recorded Data(Stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:Hydrology not present during the field delineation and there is no evidence of wetland hydrology. II 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 I I II 1 1 1 1 1 ' N.E„1,a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IWetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM—WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2—Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users IUpdated Oct 2008 with new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland(if known): Date of site visit: 12/10/13 IRated by J. Bartlett Trained by Ecology? Yes El No ❑ Date of Training: 4/12 SECTION: 18 TWNSHIP: 27N RNGE: 1W Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes❑No[] I Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size I SUMMARY OF RATING ICategory based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I ❑ II ❑ III ❑ IV ❑ ICategory I=Score>-70 Score for Water Quality Functions Category II= Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions Category III= Score 30-50 ICategory IV= Score< 30 Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL Score for functions I Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I ® II ❑ Does not Apply Final Category (choose the"highest" category from above) I I ISummary of basic information about the wetland unit 111 11 Estuarine ® De•ressional ❑ I Natural Herita l e Wetland ❑ Riverine ❑ Bo 1 ❑ IIMIMMII ❑ Mature Forest EERIE Slo•e ❑ I Old Growth Forest ❑ Flats ❑ ❑ Coastal La loon Freshwater Tidal ❑ Interdunal ❑ I None of the above Check if unit has multiple HGM classes 'resent Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number ' If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland Y Y q Y P according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. SP1.Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (T/E species)? ® ❑ ' For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed ' Threatened or Endangered animal species? ® ❑ For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are cate orized as Cate_or 1 Natural Heritale Wetlands (see D. 19 of data form). SP3.Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? ® ❑ SP4.Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the ❑ ' Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. ' To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. ' The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. 1 1 Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number 1 1 1.Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides(i.e.except during floods)? ' ONO—go to 2 EYES—the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes,is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)?❑YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands.If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland.Wetlands that were ' called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification.Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions,and this separation is being kept in this revision.To maintain consistency ' between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2.The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source(>90%)of water to it.Groundwater ' and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO—go to 3 OYES—The wetland class is Flats ' If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3.Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? ❑ The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any vegetation on the surface)at least 20 acres(8 ha)in size; ❑ At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)? NO—go to 4 OYES—The wetland class is Lake-fringe(Lacustrine Fringe) ' 4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? ® The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), ' ® The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps.It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct banks. ® The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually<3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). ONO-go to 5 EYES—The wetland class is Slope 1 5.Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ❑ The unit is in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding ' Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 3 August 2004 version 2 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number from that stream or river ❑ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO-go to 6 ❑ YES—The wetland class is Riverine 6.Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds,or is saturated to the surface,at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. ►/NO—go to 7 OYES—The wetland class is Depressional ' 7.Is the entire wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches.The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area.The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. ' NO—go to 8 ❑YES—The wetland class is Depressional 8.Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes.For example,seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides.GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT(make a rough sketch to help you decide).Use the ' following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland.NOTE:Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10%of the unit;classify the wetland using the class that ' represents more than 90%of the total area. Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional+Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under ' wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary,classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number I D D 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (sae p.3$) I D D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Figure Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=3 Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted,permanently flowing outlet points=2 I Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet(permanently flowing) points=1 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=1 (if ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") I Provide . oto or • • D D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) YES points=4 I NO a.in ts=0 D D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub, and/or forest Figure Cowardin class): I Wetland has persistent,ungrazed, vegetation>=95%of area points=5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation>= 1/2 of area points=3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points = 1 I Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points=0 of Cowardin =• , classes D D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. Figure I This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months,but dries out sometime during the year.Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. I Area seasonally ponded is>t total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is> Vi total area of wetland points=2 Area seasonally ponded is< 1/4 total area of wetland points=0 ofH '- .•s D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D D 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.44) I Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following I conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources,but any single source would qualify as opportunity. ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland I ['Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland ❑A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas,fanned fields,roads,or clear-cut logging ❑Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier ID Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen ❑Other ❑ YES multi a her is 2 ❑ NO multi I her is 1 II D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 Add score to table on ,. 1 IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 5 August 2004 version 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iWetland name or number I w r� v 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding ID and erosion? , D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Figure_ Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 1111 Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit is"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing') I Unit has an unconstricted,or sli:htl constricted,surface outlet(sermanentl flowin:) 'oints=0 D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Figure_ D Estimate the height of pondoing above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 The wetland is a"headwater"wetland"points=5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 I Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 Unit is flat(yes to Q 2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 I Marks of .ondin_ less than 0.5 ft •oints=0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in the watershed Figure_ Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the elf. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points= 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points= 3 I The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points =0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class •oints=5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above I D D 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity it provides,helps protect downstream property and aquatic I resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc.OR you estimate that more than 90%of the water in the wetland is I from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. ['Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems ['Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems I Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise multiplier flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems ❑ Other I DYES multi slier is 2 ❑NO in slier is 1 D TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on . I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 6 August 2004 version 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number 1 R 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.52) ' R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments Figure_ during a flooding event: Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland points=8 Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland points=4 if depressions>1/2 of area of unit draw polygons on aerial photo or map Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland points=2 No de s ressions •resent i s in ts=0 R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the unit(areas with>90%cover at person height): figure_ Trees or shrub>2/3 the area of the unit points=8 Trees or shrub> 1/3 area of the unit points=6 Ungrazed,herbaceous plants>2/3 area of unit points=6 Ungrazed,herbaceous plants> 1/3/area of unit points=3 Trees,shrubs,and ungrazed herbaceous< 1/3 area of unit points=0 Aerial photo or map showing polygons of different vegetation types Add the points in the boxes above R R 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep.53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. El Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland ID A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,_residential areas,farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging El Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland ID The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels of sediment,toxic compounds or nutrients in the river multiplier water above standards for water quality ❑Other OYES multi•lier is 2 ONO multi slier is 1 R TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R1 by R2 Add score to table on p. 1 I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 7 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number I R R 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (us p.54) I R R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Figure_ I Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between banks). Calculate the ratio: (average width of unit)/(width of stream between banks). If the ratio is more than 20 points=9 I If the ratio is between 10-20 points=6 If the ratio is 5-<10 points=4 If the ratio is 1-<5 points=2 ' If the ration is<1 points= 1 Aerial • • or m= • _ i. • of different ;, ,,, :. R R 3.2 Characteristics vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat Figure_ large woody debris as `forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best I description. Forest or shrub for>1/3 area OR herbaceous plants>2/3 area points=7 Forest or shrub> 1/10 area OR herbaceous plants>1/3 area points=4 I Vegetation does not meet above criteria points=0 Aerial • • • or ma. g • • •,w,••, of different • ',y• 4. :: R Add the points in the boxes above IR R 4.Does the wetland have the onnortunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep.57) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or I reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. There are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,bridges, ID farms)that can be damaged by flooding. ❑There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be damaged by flooding ID Other multiplier (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike.) I OYES multi'Her is 2 ONO multi•lier is 1 R TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R3 by R4 Add score to table on p. 1 IComments I I ' Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 8 August 2004 version 2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II Wetland name or number L 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.D) L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore: Figure_ Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m)wide points=6 I Vegetation is more than 16(5m)wide and<33ft points=3 Vegetation is more than Eft(2m)wide and<16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points=0 L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description Figure_ that results in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage.In this case the herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or forest I community.These are not Cowardin classes.Area of Cover is total cover in the unit, but can be in patches.Note:Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants cover>90%of the vegetated area points=6 Cover of herbaceous plants cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points=4 I Cover of herbaceous plants cover>1/3 of the vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in>2/3 vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1 I Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover>2/3 of the vegetated area points=0 • with °..ji• • of ,, Add the points in the boxes above IL 2.Does the wetland have the ounortunity to improve water quality? (seep.61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water,or polluted I surface water flowing through the unit to the lake.Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants.A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity ❑Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft ❑Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland ❑Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland ❑Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields,golf courses (all within 150 ft.of lake shore) I ❑Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake multiplier ❑Other OYES multiplier is 2 ONO multiplier is 1 ITOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from Li by L2 Add score to table on p. 1 IComments I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 9 August 2004 version 2 I . I 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number i L 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (ree P.42) L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the Figure_ i lakeshore(do not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland): >3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=6 >3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2m)wide points=4 >t/a of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(lOm)wide points=4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=2 i Vegetation is less than 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=0 Aerial photo or map with Cowardin vegetation classes Record the points from the box above ' L 4. wetland unit the opportuni erosion? (seep.63) Does Are there the features along the have shore which will be ty impacted to reduce if the shoreline erodes?Note i which of the following conditions apply. ❑There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings,fields)that can be damaged by erosion. ❑There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland(e.g. i mature forests other than wetland)that can be damaged by shoreline erosion multiplier ❑Other DYES multi,tier is 2 ONO multi.lier is 1 TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments i i i • i Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 10 August 2004 version 2 i I 1 I Wetland name or number I Is S 1.Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.64) S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of wetland: I Slope is 1%or less (a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 1 0(1 ft horizontal distance) points=3 Slope is 1%-2% points=2 Slope is 2%-5% points= 1 ISlope is greater than 5% points=0 5 S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay organic(use NRCS I definitions) YES=3 ,oints NO=0 I•ints S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that traps sediments and pollutants: Figure_ I Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface. (<75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>90%of wetland area points=6 I Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>% of area points=3 Dense,woody vegetation>'/:of area points=2 Dense,ungrazed,herbaceous vegetation>V4 of area points= 1 I Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0 Aerial . .' . or . ..- ,:lion . ,..ns S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above S 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep.67) I Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants A unit may have pollutants coming form several I sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity.. ❑Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft ❑Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland I ❑Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland ❑Residential,urban areas,or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland multiplier ❑Other ❑YES multi.lier is 2 ❑NO multi slier is 1 ITOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S1 by S2 Add score to table on ,. I Comments I I 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 11 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IWetland name or number Is 3.Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion. S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. I Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough(usually> 1/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation covers>90%of area of the wetland. points=6 I Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation>1/2 area of wetland points =3 Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation>1/4 area of wetland points= 1 More than 3/4 of area is grazed,mowed,tilled or vegetation I is not ri_id .oints=0 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10% I of its area. YES points=2 NO .oints=0 Add the points in the boxes above I S 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep.70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive I and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. 1:1 Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems ❑Other multiplier I 11 Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam.) EYES multiplier is 2 ENO multiplier is 1 ITOTAL-Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. 1 IComments I I I I IlWetland Rating Form—western Washington 12 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number i I IH 1.Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72) Figure_ Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each I class is'/acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. ❑Aquatic bed ❑Emergent plants ❑Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) I ❑Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) If the unit has a forested class check if: ❑Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous, I moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. If you have: 4 types or more points=4 I Map of Cowardin vegetation Basses 3 types points=2 2 types points= 1 1 1 i ints=0 H 1.2 Hydroperiods(seep. 73) Figure_ I Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or'/acre to count. (See text for description of hydroperiods.) ID Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 ❑Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 ❑Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present points= 1 ❑Saturated only ❑Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland ❑Seasonally flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland ❑Lake fringe wetland=2 points I ❑Freshwater tidal wetland=2 .oints H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. (Different patches of I the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold.) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle. I If you counted: > 19 species points=2 5- 19 species points= 1 List species below if you want to: <5 species points=0 I I I Total for page: 1 I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number H 1.4 Interspersion of habitats(see p. 76) Figure_ ' Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes (described in H 1.1),or classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. ' None =0 points Low= 1 point. Moderate=2 points 1 [riparian braided channels] ' High =3 points NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water ' the rating is always"high". Use map of t°,owardln vegetation gasses H 1.5 Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number ' of points you put into the next column. ❑Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in.diameter and 6 ft long). ❑Standing snags(diameter at bottom>4 inches)in the wetland ' ❑Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft.(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft(lm)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (10m) ❑Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning ' (>30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) ❑At least V4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) ❑Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants ' Note: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error H 1.TOTAL Score—potential for providing habitat Add the scores from H1.1, H1.2, H1.3, H1.4, H1.5 ' Comments: 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number H 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species?) 111 H 2.1 Buffers(seep.80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating.See text for definition of ' "undisturbed." ❑ 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95%of circumference.No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer.(relatively undisturbed also means no grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 ❑ 100 m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >50%circumference. Points=4 ID 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95%circumference. Points=4 ❑ 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >25%circumference. Points=3 ❑ 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for>50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above ❑ No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(80ft)of wetland >95%circumference.Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 ❑ No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. ' Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK Points=2 ❑ Heavy grazing in buffer. Points= 1 ❑ Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference (e.g.tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) Points=0 ❑ Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points=1 Aerial photo elia buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size?(dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads,paved roads,are considered breaks in the corridor). OYES=4 points(go to H 2.3) ONO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size?OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? OYES=2 points(go to H 2.3) ONO=H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? OYES= 1 point ONO=0 points ' Total for page:3 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see new and complete I descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report http://wdfw.wa.Rov/hab/phslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the I connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. ❑ Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(1 acre). ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various I species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). ❑ Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growth/Mature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 I trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. (Mature forests)Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less than 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of I large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon white Oak:Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (fill descriptions in WLDFW PHS I report p. 158). ❑ Riparian:The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. I ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). ❑ Instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions I that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats.These include Coastal Nearshore, I Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report.'pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages I under the earth in soils,rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. I ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m(0.5 -6.5 ft), composed of basalt andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient I decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>51 cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 m(6.5 ft)in height.Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 m(20 if) I long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points I If wetland has 1 priority habitat= 1 point No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list.Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) I 111 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number Ii H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the I wetland that best fits)(see p. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within'h mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some I boating,but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other development. points=5 ❑The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe I wetlands within'h mile points=5 ['There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed points=3 ❑The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe I wetlands within% mile points=3 ['There is at least 1 wetland within%z mile. points=2 ❑There are no wetlands within 1/2 mile. points=0 I H 2.TOTAL Score-opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores in the column above ITOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions — add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on p. 1 I I I I I I I I I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS I Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and Icircle the appropriate answers and Category. s A 7p 1 f a r; "-v .x r �.., :' r r d'-,,,, r a w".: � �4.L',',...'„-,41%,t,sn x ,. ;s '`5?0 �" x.x - ��'� �$� '� � �rq� �? '�` r '�i .�,',1.,, i1:777,—..'74::A: � �:#� y.'� r +5 F t r° . � A:;141-ii^. , �`f � , !;.,,,,4, • 8 di r ,J . y£P ex .. a C SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(see p. 86) I Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? " ® tidal,The dominant water regime is tidal = ,' ® Vegetated,and I ® With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. I YES =Go to SC 1.1 ONO � �� " Cat. I I SC 1.1 Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational, Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? I OYES=Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES=Category I NO=Category II Cat. I ® The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation, Cat.II I grazing, and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species.If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland,then the Dual wetland should be given a dual rating(I/II).The area of Spartina would be rated a rating I Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category I.Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in determining the I/II size threshold of 1 acre. Cat. I I ❑ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. ® The wetland has at least 2 of the following features:tidal channels,depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands. I . , ,,,m'' ,. . x=..", 1 I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 I I 1 1 1 Wetland name or number SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands(see p. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat. I Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened,Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D ❑ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site❑ YES 111—contact WNHP/DNR(see p.79)and go to SC 2.2 NO SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? OYES =Cate:o I 1 NO_not in a Herita.a Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs(seep. 87) Does the wetland unit(or part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and 1 vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e.layers of organic soil),either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile?(See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils) 1 Yes❑ -go to Q. 3 No®go to Q. 2 or 2. Does the unit have organic soils,either peats mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond? 1 Yes❑ -go to Q. 3 No® -Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND other plants,if present,consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the 1 vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes❑—Is a bog for purpose of rating No 0-go to Q.4 ' NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the"bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 1 4. Is the unit forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce, subalpine fir,western red cedar, western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in ' Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(>30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? YES ❑ =Category I NO❑Is not a bog for purpose of rating 1 Cat.I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 I t r 1 Wetland name or number 1 SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands(seep. 90) I Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats?If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. ID Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at I breast height(dbh)of 32 inches(81 cm)or more. NOTE:The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.Two- hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their I growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR"so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. ❑ Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest)Stands where the largest trees are 80— I200 years old OR have average diameters(dbh)exceeding 21 inches(53cm);crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. IDYES=Category I ®NO not a forested wetland with special characteristics Cat.I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) I Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? ❑ The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks,shingle,or,less frequently, rocks I ❑ The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) I ❑YES=Go to SC 5.1 NO®not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? I ❑ The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing),and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p. 74). At least 3/of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or unID grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I El The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet) YES ❑=Category I NO ❑=Category II Cat.II I I I 1 111 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands(seep. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? IL YES =Go to SC 6.1 ❑NO--not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula—lands west of SR103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? ❑YES=Category II ❑NO go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between Cat.II 0.1 and 1 acre,? ❑ YES=Cate:o III Cat.III - .` �. s: 9 ."i� �r",� s ',.� " Select... Comments I 1 1 I I I r I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I a ,,,.:,(--, ,o, .,, co t\'-) CD ° -Q6124-a) r4 , _ c, � . t�� , , - °� . i _ 10 I 0 7,N ,e„,, , ___...„, cn cr 1 O O ��k r t�' ___�__ :' ' O p p m c a• � m N flff o o�)t t 7 oo• -, -O * << c. c CD --, CU — C D Fe 1 N fn o \` Cn Co o \ •- CD U) r ((( 4. > ;^i. \ \ °- m` \ man v •t y c 3 Xm covv (I- • v 7 c ' x < �• \"\ z r. Cn „ 1 0 o ,-. cn O , T c. O \ -O CD CD �' k/ ^� I ya air ; � ' 0: -9 i \'\\, 11 , tiVr ,' ,�� -t 44,4,.' ' to v \. c, (1,\I /✓1L �, A y CD \`\ Z, ',f.1 i A A C.3 CU .r.-1 ....) v.2",-1- . / \ AL, -iv N-N.„ , \ 1 ,t, 4,,Ns, , .4 „ . v,t1s,..., ,s‘ N, A CD 133' \ •. .{ `. ���A� �t. �♦..,1��,. Cr I+ C \. CD CAD al \ 1 , % 4,;\ • * . ,"vior%‘ VA\ C 01 CD / `, ' \ .' •.44,,, . , 4 4. ' Alh, \ '111.4 v...„, \ -,01,,,lip. 1 . ..., ..„. , _ g . 8 s ' *" ' i %. '4' . N.`- 4 \ \ \ V` %4 N%-t-'. \41,,,. ....,,,,•■ A A Z :,„•,..:0:4-, "•■•.„ \ vv\ m v Em ` v 7 1 v'v A 3 a d a v A m o c o tT . \ Al, ,. X.\Sow. • N' , F, 3 Es w =-, • 'O c- Oc- c- v W •-•,1 \ET � J� l�'1 P' fit _7 A .. ,\ ..\� -� • A' V \ • jfl to d m \CD 0, s- co o co ,.< D-co \ \ , 1 , Nk\‘ sh ,, O-* 3 0 0 s m iv , a 7 �+cp CL CT •CZ):*1' / •-•_40 ,‘q, th ° ` 0 co \ co \ CD N \ / mc s\ � �CD .O a m x V4 0, t�RS� Cn N C) t. W CD N �' O \'\ O O N a v 3 `< ' ado o ° \\\ ///� � o °0o0 (II p�.; r.. NO O CD c M' o CD O`G Cn to cD \ / E- CD O• � •W X X C x• X Cn CD CD \ r O. 7 N 0 = a `J , illar CO to 0 CQ a `< titill \`V� CD D co 0 r i -Lw � a mn�i � � 3o a 7_ o C4- �I \ I N 7 C Cl. cr Cn 0 C i •sa I� ��- °�,' n � mvo ° nom B `. \T 8 o IIII ! I1 II n N '`: �_ v lD N N�� O < < m* ,„ om -- Q, 7I+ mew C� m0 * c ° a • m r o 4� oQ° -• c 3 c � -. y � o � cd o0 m -0 v co Qom - .. o_ o = 0 m ' .0 T• 5w rin a r Jr� 7 0 o c " 0 Fi m 0os�oo '' I', o' aav n m • o `° y A N (i ,iA O P 0 0 (D --I o d f oX L'� 'a 8co m � 7 ;� m II O fn Cn 7r j 1' Vi C� CD O a p� ,Z'0 1° -P� �� o v m v. m ° 0 � —1 x ~ (D x- ° co C7 = Q a' N (D O O 7 p� (D CD m o-0O rn a7 co O 3 7 a � =c m O o N iv Po p -, a 3 j• = t U d o m co 5 -'• Z - S. a -„ -" o v 0 m '� cp �7 o m m y 3 p cm -C1.NI- 7 CD X 5,. 1 co co 3 A-• Map Output Page I ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map la , , ,,. libill i, t ,, 7 701184008 z' s<` '-- 70118424c, 4 .„ , . .1 , .0 . „„ ,1, ,. . „.., _...., . 46, , ...., .5) .,., ,...__ .,, ,, ,.., 701184008 .-, 0 e . Lill& .1 Legend :--� Selected Features \ / �c��«" � � '� p"�°/°* \` `\ z 701184018,.--/ 701185016 ~� `~_. /~ 701184009 ...-'....-• 701184022 ` 3 \ 701191005 L___ v4:11,,°dal ^a,7,31`00.1-r,c"lx"a".°=xtS 0 \ / 49111 701195016 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Nov 06 ;13:17:04 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/6/2013 , , Map `, Page Output' l0fl ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map .v, 7,..„' 0 4 ., , . , •.....,„ 7011E1400B A'\,, •••'' ''', Legend 8—f Selected Features ` �c_�auo ` ' p°=°/o* \ 701184022 \ \ \\\\ 701191009- \ 701191007 11 1 c ii• I ______--- 1011660*6 701191005 \x~=,=mu�,c~�Cum Cc,"s�.°.w, v `9'n n 7110506 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jeffemon County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Nov 06 13:17:04 2013 hn»://giSSerYec/oervlet/c0no.esri.esrioznp.E ?ScrviCtNaoze=ovzDop&C}ieut\7eroiou=4.... 11/6/20I3 Mon Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma p an84o5. • N t.. - / / ���� 701184014 Legend Selected Features • � m/ J�n�� ` Parcels� \/ | i n�p�w 701184019 %. ` • • .`",020 —_— --' 701184009~^`` // ,~/ , \\\\\ mn���'— - • . ',, 701191007 ii A \ I_____ ____-- 40,Imo% ii• 701191005 \ / 0 x.=�~o��,�,=.^°�'u�r°�-",Gu o ` ��� m MI 19b0" FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JaffemonCountydoeonotattoothothoeooumoyofthedataoontoinedhoroinandmakeo no warranty with respect b/dn ! correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Nov 06 1 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/6/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend Selected Features r_,„EAT JC_Roads Parcels-H /C, .,.0• 8''1- ��;"✓I ..+.._ County Zoning MPR SF Tracts \ rn••+�to±8 •.�; ._ ,,,I,.._. - kural Resatlontr.41:5 Rural Resdont al 1:10 Rural Resktental 1:20 MPR-Sew le Famtry -�_... ® MPR-Munnamny MPR Resort Compex Parks and Reveal wn .. _ MI MPR Open Sporn • Rural Forest ■ Commorcia!Forest -. In hoMmg Faros! \ .. Off'” Heavy Industrial A irport CPF i ■ MPR-Vdado Cantor ■ AP1:20 Rural Wage Center ■ Resource Based Ina Light Industrai " M rc 'NPR W asia Mone LPF Ll'C \ .- in Crossroads GC • ...... ..._.. .._. ■ Crossroads CC Crossroads NC ..... .. ■ AL 1:20 UGA Urban Con+mercal UGA Urban Light Indust ra: ,,;;,.1 .... UGA MDR :;Yl.°74 UGA II OR UGA Pubic UGA LOS �tiyp� U GA-Vrsnor Orsmlod Commorc;a M PR•ORN 0rm non C F-M'M RLO Commorcar Fetus! M moral Rosouros Overlay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:10:30 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 Z > fl t a a a a W 0 i i i a r- > JN 0 0 « :: C q W W 0 • o r, (M l-NLZ-LL ilL MS) / co •- / / \ \ N / I_ / V¢q 8 Q M U pr° //// I I ° F5'" / / -, oK^ I' ova / / 1 \ / / QUO -r` j r n •aq ° < / — Vbd/� / / v.-o W co/ oa° Sg W I / \ 0 /1/,? ^r-� a I O a M I I \ p U 0 M \ 2,6o \ vi pro / / \ <o S�C5' 3 F-5 7i r.I-vi / / ��¢ ° \ J�i'/O ,p r-a ` \ 3 Ur< \ °] N sear _. \ aaw \ a w al o,.W sr`'t ' \ $ o - o Z- <^cn • o. I ^ � N '-xwM st, s°�" a a \ \ n°.3 // /.Pd zzzo N \ r a ^ r / /� % /// o- rytF . °�zn3 p vai�¢o mss. !' ‘6c-'41,-;26),. 4'�y,' I ? `).v, o `O m° �P~ °�� Oaf ".•eA. i),, a Q 3 r N V t 61/ w c�fr Ln ti} IQ �O`/ ti Ntttq, c O w O ` 'b 4 e co O v$ia,J !p` eP 2riY \'.Je. W Or N w Z �a / a ors°= mwxrn n F da.� ,Y 5 In z U a < �y0 ssa� \I'Vq-%. 4`0v° e.1 e''°- F+,�o�+ ' 4 OF-0xi RR z 1O p� $F e I ; �43�' b ��,,,`J2 ' /'. O W w o¢'� $Ya Sao gaa ,�• fij �Q `a> a9+m. '�.(�`�\.� \ ;\�Jk�\�S es.=moz� ^r N :4'1; n ',"§: ,L'L .°r tea`' ' \ �6 \) \ • I* r z0<K r $1st= e; ',-, . GG s°f A0-\\ z f\\ ,� ,0,0- ,_�,..i o o 1 3 3 00.46%,\Z\ Ep'' 2 o a U w u, a \ (M l-NLZ-IIl b/l MS) 's L. yo 88S i n — ,T, Ao ".:7>, ury w:. — n n x x 0m - s w bx_o = w wig : z.\ Jo — g$8$ 3 w wo° w z • oa ¢ -- sFwB � 8 F, • • • • zam o — 4w6 wz � °� a g worms — � "> 0'&•Oi <€, K . a asp ` _ w_ i w F w OVi H OV O N 25 R 5 p° a en°N �5 a \< , Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map | . -\-------'—'=_._._7''Cr_, ,' 701161.-- .7-------'1,, ..,..11:011; golil _ ' Legend Selected Features /^,/ Jo_m". " N1184014 [- Parcels-H \ , Shoreline Designation-Arc �\ � ^/ n�=�n��"= \ �'. _ �^� c..~~�°w".� \ � u'"~ / a� ���m , ��" w"^� // '/�' , u==,=� /' --- / , 701184022 Naturalluterban `` ,' �,,, 71184004 ,pot Other Shoreline Designation. 7114032 Poly ` �� w=.'3 nx�xxm- im «~^~~~~ 701191007 I Other i . r----- L v=°=~^*�.�~~c=�C~="o~.. • -.. �~____-�. 1916 K 701105016 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JefenmnCountydoeanotuttau1tutkoaucuxaoyofthadutaoontainodkominandmakoo no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 18:58:37 2013 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 tip.:<_HI:;v-r , l srs,1E w►� Department of Ecotogy Coastal Atlas . = 6/23/2006 10:03 AM i .,,. r. • to "--+-.e. , "t, ,- rr r M t:. d to e ., . y,„ ' ' o.. o f 4 x s ? : :4',-, so- - a tx ' Photo Reference: 060623_00159 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Quilcene Bay, Bolton Peninsula Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels,68Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels, 1795Kb) Approx.10 seconds for 56kbps modem;1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx.4.3 minutes for 56kbps modem;38 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00159&vint... 10/31/2013 ' Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map i 701183009""mo. | I . ' ' � '� � 0_, _r- ��� l--' '/ 701184014 .-' ,,, s, Legend / Selected �, ��=" \ ,/ �o_m°°u ' parcel"* • Classification °'=^"an= AI I w,Non fish o�nal xn Non-fish mwmm v*^ w"� o��Omen no! / Ns Non fish m°��ssonal �` �� u �°="~��"�� -�` 701184004 nnxwo� 7114=23 . \. s 701191007 _.- 1 A Maps wooded try°olie,sm Corny v"=*aro°mum o�__ -�___�'9'11 [ 70''95096 II, 701191803 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JaffemmnCountydoeonotattootooth000uunaoyofthwdatauontainedheminandmakoo no warranty with respect toiCo correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 18:59:21 2013 6rhp eSc . ' ' .. }0/30/20}3 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 701184015 `.,, r t_3?7011 8 70183009 "'' ro11a4a3r 7ottau�tt r 70tt&1C3e x !'. 701184010\ 17701184006 ilj r''' 4,O,, 701184008 a,p, I \ ro11 8403y \ 7 \ 701184014 - Le ge rtl 0 Selected Features 70118402, / ' JC_Raads F. Parcels-H 7011840119 t DNR Streams 4..." ; 4Y " ��"` 701184020 tB4dQ0 \ d I a If TtCa4 ..+' T0,125 70t 184018 � TYpv4 rot,$4009 _ Typo 3 • f 201184022. \ ▪V Typo 2 TYCO t "`` 701184004 4".4• . Other 701184032' _ y, \r'� 701184023 ., cti ,X`701191009 5', \V- 701191009-701191007 ` I I ' r701191005 MzE,r rr yd 1�_,,rzsr Cosily Gerard S r•cc.GIS 0 •'d•fl 701195016 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:00:09 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Pagel of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map sxwwos 701184037- " 701184033 . � v nnnpm� �` ~ 701184006 ..•' r- 4 / xn ��� i� � 4� 701184039 7018= ~ �� Legend/ / o"mc�omammo ~ � Jc_maom os, Parcels-H C, Priority Habitats and � Species-*� 701191007 l 1 11 A _______ ,.,., 701185016 0 611861■1189=06 191t1 701195016 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JoffemonCountyd000notatteottothoaocuraoyofthodetocontainmdhominandmakoano warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:03:51 2013 ejcd~^ 4 -.� . ^ � , 1, http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma ZIOK4lkia 183008'/ 701184037. C} 701184038 "IllIllar4rlli %St84010 fti nttts4aos ` ' ,� � - 7011840.40 701184008 p '' i y \� `` 101184039 r`\ 701184014 Legend CISelected Features - JC_Roads TOtt8402t 1 1 Parcels-H 701184019 .K. 4 (, MI Wetlands 701 r' . '0 I 701184018,.= � 7079850'8 �r TOt184009 �` 701184072 ,, I ---, 701184004 �' } ..701184032 .--s' '4 701184023 �y j • - "701191009 % l; ▪ 701191009-701191007 1i_ 's, - 11 �1 _ - - :701188016 701191005 1 VSr-nv:.doi>:,:cam sot Carty Cares Sa-rxn GIS .r .v'it 'n•.cr•«, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:04:10 2013 i http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 701t8i015 :"83009, -,y30 701364?;: - t644?sc Legend Selected Features JC_Roads Parcels-H Seismic Hazard ?^^ t 18.4C-.4 184023 t 1'1009 S t 701101007 Y- 701191009" y .. 701191007 I � 70194005 Naas p-credal h.: Canty CeMrat&moos GIB , , I°9111 70119504F. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:05:09 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• rY &10'5 701184033__--_.= 70''830r-74 IC' d'y_ti7? 701181037.` 701189017 'i r ,f • !'. < 701184C,m 701184010 701784008 F ` d1 � 701 184640 O ' \\. 701184006 IIIII II. 131r ,, ,t 701184039 0 701184014 Legend Selected Features 701184021 - c/ JC Rosds Parcels 41 70118401 �� ! J FEIN*FIRMS doe ,i184020 \ 1. 701184018, 701185018 AM NB lel00 701184009 /',-' mi Other f f 701184022 \ N -ti 7011$4004 7 ` 701184032' - 1, ,f 701184023 1 '1 ''./701191009 \ 701191007 i 701191009 �- _ 5 701191007 til Ji ...----Y� 701185016 \ 701191005 II f V,m:rue dd -cor,e,cri Cam•Can:f:kr,.:cc,GIS ` '91ft ` 70"95e.'6 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:05:47 2013 • ô65 , http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 ---,�� Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ' /0.'MO' . ' \ - ,,,,,, -' 701184008,,,„-' 'AR% ' •a\ - 70118039 Legend Selected Features Jc_Rdau" r°=°/"* Critical Aquifer Recharge ^�, A~"" / <0,"``�0`" 'u»«^«*^ I �mw`�m 701184009 ."..- � �� 701184022 , I mmM / I SARp^^mw 701991009' 1 11 ',, 701191807 1 It i \\\\,ii \I _....------------)7011asotta I 701191005 If M.^,=°^�-,°~.c0-t~�r..°ac•.=.a� I '. °m1n'v`, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:06:35 2013 httn cmr C ' ' ' ^ �,,6.ao�',c^'��'v/�u�vu�c»u. uuo�up.�moo�up/o�rv/�c� beotVezoxVu=— 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map /, • ,y.L.2-1,...!! o.,8.3.2•29,,,:,, A.,_,.!,:,..,+j, i t , 1 tet ...+1t....9.i !..‘.1....t,, &1 IL el.) $1 N \\\. --t—__ tt„ 1 Legend CISelected Features i'r.)—8402' 1111111114. / JC—Roads F Parcels-H f.) 'MO'9 Shoreline Slope Stability C' c*. AY'8,1t.t.e,:t I I !Staple I I nrteratod tale ,..,'&1,"I.I , .0000" I I Unstable do" M Un Mask:Recant Landslide 7 UnstatItttoid Landslide \ I I %seldom! `r i 1 11 xr+,:rt.,tickt,r,..tr+t—,..1 1 floa ry cena-s Somatts GIS 0, /6/1+0;1 9'..0■5 \ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:07:45 2013 ,---. 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion----... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ' ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 701183009 701 mow -, 'N, /01184037 , . ' ~ v�y , � . L � \ / �. ��� Legend Selected ' ���� Parcels-1i o/pz moestSin 1 701184018,Z' 'v"o"~SIPZ ,_„, ri u===SIPZ `^` .-: , �---- � 701191007 L- - ill �~.~^�".*�.�.�c~.a*—..GS u - 70—950'6 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JoffemunCountydneono1attoottotheaoouraoyofthedatoonntuinodheminandmakoonowonantywdheapoct to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:09:43 2013 ' hrt` .eoi.c . ' — 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map i ' ' ' �)l ' � � / , � . , il \ 4 ,-,, \,,ik. , ) ,„./ 7011114008 \v''' * e L'-... ��f, 701184014 Legend Selected Features \ �/ Jc_m=� ' � [_] nam��� \\,,, .74:01184019-------- v . . I ) il � m Foot Contour x, 701184020 r if �m"^�m", 1 = ,/-' / ~�____---, i -_~ / � � \\ \ \ H 1/i Mau:,.°��'�`°c~�c~" Sexy",uu u--- - , 19� \ , ,00"9;.:',H.� . FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 18�57�422O13 ' � � http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map y -7 3 /:---" -, ' t . te 7t. i � I C •1 ` p - „,,,( i .%. ',;.,k .f- 'tee, I Q:, � Yi` e ��; t_I / , 4,1 I..-. ;.1rr, q i ,, j lid t ,� � 1.,., i'Ed &M i! c �{(t I k—'t y tl, '. .\---'2 I .. ��� Legend • ^-v• Y + ° � p i`�.h Selected Features , �.,_ ,Cu lice na Rd 1,,J ` o. m ,'•y-h t ..Q 5 —,7117..p ,M` ' ` ' " , r f Township Lines .....J.4 S'..,' a c"-a� �-n,EamL'•I.ti+4ci.C}krr JCRoads t E- Parce s-H �� tS USGSITopas ,r-i I .(n{ \ I lit n ?w xllp ',, i tom° = .,r i... . . . .. .. . . . ..`p. .itr-e-,:,, -,. ... , ,F,...), 79A� 1 +8a - r - r .' g.. 4t fi,c 4 , �U.� � kvi .- c�:.c- .rt..u�r.:..cr�x..cam,.;t ,.Yi •� io1 �#•�i8tf S.4,1_,. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy ofi the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:11:22 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 10/30/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend Selected Features JC_Roads Parcels-11 TU.cbd 7:.cre-:ur Curr.+' c r.s c Oningani==a11011 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:12:37 2013 http://gi sserver/servlet/com.e sri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C lientV ersion=... 10/30/2013 M Page 1 of 1 map Output ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• Rw £ rillF� �v � miditkrigj ''-p. o- 414' \''' --- Legend Selected Features '• JC_Roads * Parcels-H > [+ 2011 Aerial Photos is s+. * d 4 AA' .. 4 0 • s I y � Y �I sr=:ru:do i�i_e`Fsw i Cost,Car,^» v cx�,GIS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Oct 30 19:12:04 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/3 0/2013 road Page 1 of 1 ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 1192#1 E QUILCENE RD ROAD NUMBER:C327508 ROAD NAME:E QUILCENE RD ADDRESS:1192#1 APT:1 REAL MILE POST: APPLICANT: ADDRESS CREATION DATE:01/01/68 PARCEL: LEGAL: GRID:J-12-F FIRE DIST:2 ZIP:98376 POSTAL DISTRICT:QUILCENE PLANNING AREA:10 VOTING DIST:201 CEMETERY DIST:2 HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST:48 WATER DIST: SITE LONGITUDE: SITE LATITUDE: SITE COORDINATE TYPE: ACCESS LONGITUDE: ACCESS LATITUDE: MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS http://isserver/Address/RoadAddressDetall.asp?ROAD NUMBER=C32750884ADDRES... 10/31/2013 CC ' I-I •- 0 O C3 LL N _0 Z LL `� 0 I-I O LID Lf) N -- -- CO \ Q (- a) — co r- —3 o -0 — Cu CD O O L 0.. -o X O -0 +' Co X C U C) O I-I W O C) ++ -0 I- 0) 0) W -- O L L L I— I` CC -0 C) U C.) I-I Z 0 Cr) 0 J Cl. CL X C.) I- F- O O CO 0) Q a) a) W 0) O 0 V/) LL U CO W C O 3 N- N 3 I— Cu C0 ". O O 0 Cl) — J U 0 I - -o Z C.) CD C = O CD C.) H J r- -- N J 3 J CO ) 3 7- CO Y J CO I- O Cl) H Cl) "t7 C • X I-I W CI) V C W Ct Q J W CO — W CZ CO F- CD CO CC W Q O W Q CD I-I 3 CC 3 J I-I )C 0 I- CO a O F- I— ¢ ¢ CC m N- O CC I— W CO 0 J Cu et i W W 0_ N- W W "O Cu CO O X W X W `v\ CC C.) I- CO CC I- a) J 0. O U CL 0) CL CO J O CO X U) CU Y I-I a) .- 4 Y O d O g O O CD CO F- X -1-1 �., v • D_ o Q CO — +I 0 O .- CO Cu O O O O CO Y O X 0) N- Q r O [}- O LID O O O 10 L Cu .- O C.) a) CO o 3X C O X a) -- L 3 L Y Y C — a) O +-. a) `T a) a) O a) -- 7) 4 L a) C) co a) "0 > 10 C) L L Q — 0 a) O_ L C) a) X 4-' C.) "0 X a) CD d CO -- -- (0 a) I- F— X q- F- CA a) q- )E 9E I-- .Cr r CC • H 0 O C3 LL N ID Z LL. O I—I O LID —7 LCD N CO — C+7 1` '7 o - Cu co O o L 0- -o f CC 'O +. Cl) X c U O = H LI_I O 0 +, -0 I-I 0) 0) W -- O L ..0 -C F— N- Q -0 U U U I-1 Z 0 CD C] J 0- Cl X -„ U I— F— O O CD O) Q CD CO W CO V = 0 LL, C_) Cr) CC O -0 CO LLI C = 3 ti 3 1- Cu CO �. O O 0 CO — J C.) CD I -D Z U CO C = O = C.) I—I J N- -- N J 3 J CD 3 -- CD Y J CO I— O co I-1 CO -O a: r- X I—I W CO C W d- Q J W CD LU CL CO I— CO co a: W Q O W Q C] I—I 3 -- CC r 3 J I—I X CM I— CO aL o F— F— ¢ ¢ CC CO ti CC CC F— W CO Cl J Cu dS W W Cl N- LU N- 0- I— O = U L LI -0 CU CO O X W CC X W a: U F— C`) CC F— CO J 0- O U Cl 0) a. CO —1 O CO X CO CO = Y I—I CD .— Q Y 7 Cl O X O = CD CO I— E +-' \ U Q 0- C3 Q co — +.' 0 0) - CO 9 O O O d- o co Y O M C)7 N- Q CO CI m O LID O 0 O "D L Cu O C) CD C") O _ 3t C O )E a) -- L 3 L Y C - a) O +1 a) E a) a) 7) a) -- D) Q .0 a) C) CO CD "0 > CO C) L L C. — 0 CO 0- L U CO X +• C.7 V X CO CD 0- CO -- -- CO a) I— F— X CF- F— CD CO e-I- X X I— Q I CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 701184019 Printed: September 16, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner ZON13-00042 MLA13-00125 AMK PROPERTIES I LLC P Application Received: 9/13/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD-determine building envelope for future home and shop No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP70-00044 COOPER N Application Received: 5/28/1970 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/28/1970 Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM70-00044 COOPER N Application Received: Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 9/16/2013 Page 1 of 1 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 701184019 Printed: September 16, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner ZON13-00042 MLA13-00125 AMK PROPERTIES I LLC P Application Received: 9/13/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD-determine building envelope for future home and shop No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP73-00064 COOPER F Application Received: 4/10/1973 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/19/1973 Case Finaled: 4/19/1973 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM73-00064 COOPER F Application Received: 4/19/1973 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 9/16/2013 Page 1 of 1 I I II!IIIII I IIII IIIII 1 I IIIII III III 7979. N rip�' CC ZZ ii �i 2p pp o yyq y y o Z Z ' • m of r D yDry O�Aagi xTmin�Ixii nZ mO A m Ay O xZZ�ZZ xnoy xxi om Znm my y�"2� A Zmm"6 2Z ZS Zi ZmmZZ-Oi ATZnx�m {5T�!D A -I TC2 O =Z�m �T(pxntZ�TStTS OT�FiZZm 2Z?Z X U S 2 P RN m Tw m Amlt(Opnm R 2 Z m pL" n mmm m mmmmcAmSmmm m I zW p" � RAA mpif ^'p~ m <. ZZ y rxMi20- v m m G pmu i OO1OOmo q 0 m A 2 ozQd OZpp(pn;qp (((p[[[ A%, O A .. §A 1n. ymy ppA a w 2 m D "OW E#6 --11 pZp y AyFiD b;C * D b i.1. yA CCC yR".NAy §X A;'"fiy N2 �1 yy N O�i S�mAm 0 x T p -g � T C urtmi m��SOD�L o�D " Cl1n 222 2-1 a 2ZTy C C 2n0 « r T a x �a 'Pny m.. �QDAAgiA2n 8 $r�,TA$um� .:'A $ 2OT ~ °�'� r2O UA - gmoog o" A QRQ q "g „ Vi.,05,~ 8 C Tm-° �8$y°c= A2 `8 �°z�°m m g� _ k 21x [11g-M m t 4 F° m-mmi Ow, r -1,82Nmi ;p m-'2, °EEA4"iA**-T°z Ia - -gy m �o "'1 ag m g im mD A A " m FsF£ IA oaf ix z mA ��($(��� my1my1�gm �� z o° A" 2mz£w a4 Ax 82 p,,4yhg,=Am EIA ZD ZOCp I., 28. 00 8 2$ T8 =.p AW;gx m V-i y x pN x <?mm O�F I R� Z> $ S�$ o m 'dAT o I V N w A- m v p Z m y F A O > i z 2 a k Z 3 5 D l o o q F. 82 D m m--y g O A l T m u o O 22 m Ti 3 y T .2-; Am OH " ( n ' " O-. T y a 2 9 o0o oo fi po D �OOyp O O" O m T- O T S '" r b* G m x D " m Qi Z o g Dg A y A m P o o S 0 W A Z 11-7_ 131' OH 0 m r �+m IX z: m OA m " i° m ° O m2 mo= $ , 3 �$ 8 $ $ z 1 y *; flic a NT'° z g4 - A A 8 g ¢ON 8 m ".�4" w ry m Q os �, , n1 2 mA T O N O " O x g Q81 OA 0 2: A r T "A O Z J 2 opr., '". z io q o $ c ; $m oi' o y 1tirg oA si a m y = 6 N i " g- OOD g2 -A9.1 Q 8 i R $T A z> z• x 80g ° _ °y " x " O a NI- v m mz F� A x -p a 1 o A -m' mA 7't C gDO r S O -01 O V RI OT �: S my mm80 0 > i g ;P ,7; $ g s . . o i�°2� A x$ ^^22 Ag m y 8 v o g ffAee i� 1$A G ym 00 O O 'a F r x Yt -' y 2 m Nm W z C A C > O" O -Ti £ " m g $ '$ y a ° .� g .8 m z £ 0 N o O i , m -I. mi Z D — m €w �g? M P my � g�R €amp mmmm =�� I T °T mom =m=m = 1�n4Xmm� m� i cn pD 170 qmm Aulmmm i A° A401 y ." mmmm mmmm m"= A 0 mi m{s M7� A 1 z"" m L rn 2 m - JY _m mmmAmm7nmmmmm_ - <m r c Z ny$ i9_,. pD 88 4sz°i °i AAAA 0AA g"D g, ra li Af41!� � 4,, -" w .v° N=m ? u 2t°a,'l4rf, $° o 5i-15119”,2.10:,-1.2°. �2 ..q. R me b (n o g 'NA1; a <� pa °_g >m� 4N 8 y 2 R m • s No._ -=$ 4400,+A'� .482. „y2E >. yy m 8 _ i,,A_. 78 °� EEE AAAEI&O$o .4g m� Z < y 4'x O yt m_C gam �l O ¢�S £T T o 9 1y�1 III111111 Ry11fy� l�ilm� 1p DQ S b v " q; �FF;i04112 ZS goo gam 0.14 m 4F4A ZAZ §� miiy WW4m2 i ii SIT m.1) r4"1 S' �Vx m m;°wm V# mTm EE64i m ° m & 72g,4- . 1-IAA '/ = ZJ mop~ mg� " 1yo" OA mm1n-"i z,", '-mi444 Awmymrm p� ���ppp�p �.f..T° .,a'y�,��'�. o A F� N m 2 A " g1Yu ` Zm MA0m0 AmA ms1u l°4-; 255 Dm A SpmNti, Or m TmA:T O"' m " iw ,n z 'q°-mal • g5jg4,1 og o o Fsr� x °mN ° m mr{n 1" Fm "T' ID • 'Al iPoi7 W" 0-,i ` rrm°$ ammTT • Ei. "� Wyly yym"mm s fuLS ? D ay mRi -mi mL mgm m m Am Nm AM,. " TTI11 El m .A-9 gg 0 A p �O y- I0 gi AA yi$m �°n .8 0 --- gD. .. O y m m y m8 Mi ti . gAmz m g�m �' °°A go p2Eoi E$ ym 5 �' °g,, •O iytyn $ ; m wQ Dy O < A m m_m m 1nA3,m AT, O m m -o" m w' tim ° 40 0 z o m�g $ m g !al "8; ??2 8 8 ; °� —I N pp o n. A z (g1!al io° 2, z ii' m 8 j . 1 2D Pn2p� ; t ` 2 8 w 2-W ZOC - 1 g VGA m e7� i T m m �y A-;': c 5- ° $ 8 z m g m 1 z W'; Z OT x y (0Z T 2 Z m A- " D ,.,1 2 i .5 O T " D O 8 "2 T r+ i°-$ 6 8 $ ? « ma egg x x i rwFir m _ z y m y � m m g m ogm i $ 4 ° p g c1 a o ro gZZ=z f 8 " omZZB=r g o f mn y� c o p0 A m pm� -mi a'00 r' y m C x 0 O O i 82 T-zz r _2 m yA z , - xo w TS N EPA 9,i-o- 'R o ;F c ? < ° i w o 4 o y x r D O w r°2 O m c m i) N O r D g y m 2 O N z " % X mm2rm 8 mA= 28 2 =r�, � r � "I r D ZT 9 Oo A "O?N Z $ °mpFzO D hUh2 A i x "Qn m y 8 a'Z"`fm� y0 2 ACO[A ° c ''y� s, cn poi N fM " ..:, 1111111110111111'1111517979 VOL.0 PG.5,1 Pa. 0*I It ,. . 0 C I.- , - 0 m _ -- - a ra ,------ as 1-7 ,------ - __--- a ,---- ----- m .--- ----- f/ 7/ \ / 0 N1L1.". ; ..---.'-'. ...,/--------------- .....'w, I I° e/----- (2 s. ,...I. 71 1 la r—Z 2 e'da 4 41 so ■ 0 4.1 ''' .4.4...„,,SP'/:77.....-----■___----- ''.. ....2,,k,' \\ \\ , 4. / 0 ... .t ,,, z ,q., ,,, .ii: ..,,i. ;, 2 . --- - -------",—,------ v, ,.?... III: 7' ;IP ifrlIA' 0 —Ipt I' 1/ // „ .., , FI .'.\\.:\ \ \'\''''' 80.. / '` ;■ % 7,1t8 k b 0 a ,,,, !, 7/ 7,/ 7 ,4-0„),:: . , ,„.. __,.•,''------„ \\\. \ ":"01,,,,,,,,.. / :t9 f- Z • II a ° t "I y A ) : , •/ ! '",°Iivel -.`---":,-..-- ,,;°, 1=-1 \ \\.\\14.,\ t t i ..; P. IV /\. l:J" A Ves' /., 1 ' 14 en 0 no 1 E:41 \s \•V\-tli 0'..\\t‘p: , ell !,e El i .3.). .,2.. . .,\\‘ ; \'kr -,'4 --''' •:)..st— 1! '?"'>•••••-- ' ' "..-' 4''''"4.---' \,,, ''''''...':'..'.. ..:....' '''' '''''''\ . ' . !'I' ---- 7- 1- --._ -7- - \\--* ■ ° ''s ; , % '°'6----,.., ' ' --- - '*/*---- • - ss " -')"- ‘ ..14 'N ---0-------. --:-•--2.>2.--- ''----- ----;_,%. '°. II -i' ! I /•"" --.'---,...LI--1— - - --. ''‘N\ -s‘,•\): ; - __e\,,73",... 1-: -, .'' ''. ,' ----,•.-_, --- , -----/‘ • X" _ . . . F , -. :',.............1',.... ep ' i $.;)t .0 \ ,..... 1..,<:,..., 0,1% I . •iil,.;0,7--- ------ _ -------,,-----,, \ \. ,......P. " i ,10; iiii'61 -- --■._ ''.-.--_, , ...„.,.._, ......., ... * . \ • '........:,. N, t 4 “.a . .1'1' .,, ----, o , ----. . • 4 •---,.. -.. 0 --- --... '....-----.......,........ ---___ ..------------ • ''', t \\,,\>_.-_,-. ...___471 LY49.; - 4 ------"-----.......S\ . \ socso." Illilli:;\11111'ii'l.i\111%,111111't/\111:1;1'.111.\/1:11'\.) - '' '' '''' C)---3---':'---- / / _ . ,/ I/ ---__ --_____ 11'41, ; -... -.. ,. //try ,/,/,,,,,,(t _ -----,_ \ \ leflil ii 1:Iii Ili i r-------------------_------"'-------.. --------- ------,_ ,/, il -............. .. ......_,.... --..„„ f...\ ‘\ i 1. 0 / --....... ----,... ,,,•;1101: 1. 110 \\\ - . . ....... .'.\\ , ____—_---- .., . ....,.\\X I iv l'v\\ 1.,.1 ,: HLI1 ■IIIII■ 70/.El N.......„. '•••..... -......,...., 'N . (V .. niRrce tans sweep r a NORTH 7to 74 \ 1 \ 1 . . . ' ...■.3 ........... it 1 ) I 00 Ut tACALF:RAWN BY: R.E MILLPOINTER, LAND SURVEYOR- FISHERMANS POINT I /, /// 1 , D AL XIV, 54E2-1 52ND.PLACE S.E. DATE: 1-4+-04 RELLEVUE, WA. 98006, A PLANNED,RURAL -RESIDENTIAL-DEVELOPMEN T SHEET s OF 14 421-746-3430 FOR. DANIEL J. EVANS,5215 N.E.4STN.St,SEATTLE".9131-0S . . . 4 B O' N c m 0 a 0. o * O 0 a`' i 4t A 00 \ -I S* y X x a = X m m 0 0 0 FA s \ o x °' :9 03 a{ / a m CD ai� aQU m a(D '�Q* h1 • H \ • iPili CD \G / W =h0 -, cn o N S • O X 0 \ CD a < v. CD.,� / * v co 5, � ', 0 0 .\ m X coca c \ W 0 m a a, 1,,,,,.. ,,, 0 in 5 X 4...." N ....V. ° w e *k `� *# tI 6 \ '#\; lillitiolt6ite.A ‘60.- 100, •.'Ilo X 5 c ham `- I.w. '�, � r►1�' a l\ \ -di ��\ * \ \\N\ fir c. .\ ... \., ; a: c's* A\A .s \ •\ ■ N w vmm 3mm mmm m max 03x m ti' _ a 11.„10- \ ..,.0... . Aiii\v„.., t ®��m o m m m = \Alr 0 t � \ Cr o / \JAI_c >,_ . :. N\ir 420 `` ' '' X / ‘ / ° u, m a . ". +o m m m a M. e ,q a CD 10 CI) IMP", M - T ;� 6 / w w Cr CU --.1 m c -0 m `,.`�` 0) `4b�...�,� •o not a'o m mS •44%,,.� o b O 0 ✓° ? 0 C 1 W t wit N G ti P F✓° �p 0 = C✓ CL c._ m oo r u, US � m a 'ti X X C cn X. X !a (D (p C' d O V1 i a •p O 7r O N ca mw Boa a 1 co CD o � �� o m O aS ° 5" � D rn - n O -,• a a � Vi N N TIT] °: ? 0 ° gco CO. a0 m > cn CD m c. c_ a < �, omcma3 < vm C")7 m Ta (( 11 CD G 7 a Ql ,N. m :zo c -• ° ° Cr) P-= 0 D -o C aEIt1;!'I c m 0�N r oc c ° iD m W j 7 O f f O -izo ? o=N � . o o II O 2== � � w mac; O ° �g d TI m o NV � Q � o v o- v �, H m rnXo 6 N ' ° I 3 �. fi. • B 0. w c ccDD Q n Da * Q m• D \ r>° 0 i I E „;‘‘ 0 . o_ K * * \ 03 CO (D -� (D X 6+ (p X (D y O O X �r — IOW CD voi= \\ m o °o °oncacg � N � C f I 0 CD \ n o l+ m• m m y m < -0 -1 o i . _(p:--'' Cl) 1+ , 0 `\ 0 Q O 0• - -p . 0 C " �':�V1I1..*Z.1•Z1I►Z�.�*:.. m cD o 0 01 c m p1 _ cD m i'r''' ;' •., -'� 5 m -0 X < \ t°y `` c°11 n m = `< 3 y y ��r' / C ' �A,! Woon � m \ a � y3 Z °1 y y •4? 0 -I < oo`•1 CDc �' m °" m (° aD0 \'\ � w� onn-1 .r l���f aa. 0 3* W •±. (D 41 GI C) �� • X• (D \ R. n 0 5' 7' 4, j , ** n ? (� H- y \ mz W p - - ' y ♦ • mm \ no -O - . `�;F Ii: N \ pp y v,. , _ o � m \iji \ oy to+4♦ x o ou 2 2 \'\ �• Nyo x_ .6r, e ,410 .4. \-7, - ,," -",,�-- 10 n 3 1s \ 3 o C 3 \ (A C CT co m c1 a- o ?c ♦r INII, ♦'° `� y \ 0 Nre''',`,, „„,,,,,,„ ,• an k ' 't's , n O 7 C h, li. r►'� i.�w� � r1 � \ "Km ro' IN‘..iihk, ._ .,,, . . :•.,\ # \ cut om `�♦ 0� 7 \\ • ci \ CD 5 g- * ED— 4 : \ . tifr " N. • o ' � n O F y O N 0) W W . •- 4-1 M CD \ma" Q N (D e p X N � W'N Cr X 3 \\><<"" ij � 0111>ILl .teli 0 0) cp cn .... ••• ...< =— \ \ \ 1\4\IL\ 4. it o ui aOS / ∎ �0 • /o c i .S O ' 3 c n o, . c 1 X .+♦ ./ v p) 3- ° 3 0 0 0� 1\ ,_��1O /- CD CD CL < /, _____ / � N N Q N 7" C \149,p�\ (11 r' Ul 0 (� A (A)(O N YJ Q r! O =. (D P w ,\\` 1 y ' 1 1 U) O (D O O bj �d 1"� w ;� N (-13 N N 7 Cl) C� +,u = A y —' 2 ..< S 7 pAD O O p N O .-. O tc X X y N X, y n cD CD n cu co 7 c S(0 c p1 `< y G1 (o n g (O (D a, co Q. A•� .� v y M -s u '. 0- (D y S (D ° c 5' > > = 3 6 fa) N E n N N 7C 3 'a 3 N n n 0 fl: cD 0. 0 O-00 C 3 0 n E o 0 v a 0 n E J.ti�� coo = Onv ° 5mm Fin] • o -, 71 _._ _ 119 1 �(� m S o o co y _CO m D to a II � D• El V d 3 ('D� p (�D (D — 2 y y to< C O o O cSD r 0 fp X �O y a m m C7 ?�' 0 74: 'S C (D 0 N s< .0 L= y O co 0 y OD c' M U1 nc C *2p ° ' o y m N 0 g , _S 0y d t — X S (A vi (�i o o nm y �v II O 7 3 S 7 0 j _ 0 C y 6 A k O y 0 CD o � (D � -� O .y-. ° 3 -* c e v N• -1 x Og3a (D g (D co 6N O-, nR. m 1l (D p pwj D ?. m O = d p =c m O o n1 .Ni �'. Am n > > o m m ' - 3 0L1 ;� o m o m y 3 03 n CA -L NN 7 y - _ c11 * u o e X S. u 4 61t-CLa T 'afiLd f CCIte"9 /76) Ca.,70 e- r tgr Xe6-6/6.--6e17 , VelA4 tirce_A_LLAz" 146_4-----A----- —V 1 P/72_54:j eitrut;4) bo/./k_e..4_11 earceA I I 4 ti�s�N co JEFFERSON COUNTY G�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street E Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment o Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcdna.co.jefferson.wa.us RING Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center November 13, 2013 AMK PROPERTIES I LLC PO BOX 763 QUILCENE WA 983760763 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 1192 EAST QUILCENE RD CASE#: MLA13-00125 Dear AMK PROPERTIES I LLC: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. Jefferson County maps of these parcels show that they extend farther to the southwest than shown on the site plan and that they have an irregular-shaped boundary. Please revise the parcel boundaries on the site plan. Wetland occurs on the parcel, in the southwestern portion of the property. Submit a wetland report to comply with Chapter 18.22 JCC. The upper limits of the wetland would be the ordinary high water mark (OHWM)and this needs to be shown on the site plan relative to property boundaries. The Type N stream occurs along the southeast propery boundary. Please revise the stream location on the site plan. This stream has a 50-foot buffer. While a SPAAD does not vest for potable water, the applicant must demonstrate that it is feasible to have potable water in order to issue the SPAAD. Complete the attached potable water form and return to DCD. There is a 20-foot road setback from East Quilcene Road. Please revise the site plan to show the road setback. If you have any questions, I can be contacted by phone at 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by February 11, 2014. Pursuant to Jefferson County Code(JCC) 18.40.110(3)and (6), if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, i' apartment of Co munity Development Staff 11 c: File R1°lttir(( f c(ry JC_ ►�� 17G11iI rt � t He0_141 56 trylc 1e t -k- f_ 3 0 d �k Q2 v h n nK co W \ D° .4,t ,,,.. gt11 ..... ,. a s. / - g • \ 0 m o o a �D. x x"0 ---a) = X m• moo I. � m m . \ — � vaa6 ° o � y' 0 -0 o0oncn(ow ,. .. " m ° \I'"• 03 ° v n n _ \\ Cr G Cn 5 O c LD y to cn - � �. W '. CD 0 = N NI-CD cD CD co \ N (D n O. c O : w co R. O O N. N. cD cD X O \ n G J p_ D1 n y co '\ D) W cD 7 Co It '∎ N '`' ? I+ O 7 D) \ _ O °° ccoo N N it 0 0 ' I. p m X c0 c0 U) \ co. 0 CD 0. G. f -I %� :,r..€ co C f0 I , .0 W N , i w O N CCI 2 \ pO .y.. + O 9:1 iiI �O 11„. — \ cD +�j ° ° 3 \ 3• -u - �A cD cD D) L' .ir• �i `r (i*.r�1 .G ti\ C \ CD N •j'��.► t, �.�.� ♦to \ 73 '\ ` � � ,,000.`. o o \ • . c.," o 0 dirk. ,z;cp.,A4:41:44-0,4* 77 \ _'! a — / '•'•'•i•'+'•• 0 _.IDM ~ms`s \/G7 \ \\ \. . o -a - CD , , ...,, . _., 0- —1 0) 3' \ 0 . • , X I+ 1 a u% • No, . 7 n n. loco UI o `\ tr., ° .I/ n n� o m v A C .°. N 30 ncD y N Pa- ` X .`U.Iv O O — D) D)03 - nrs '\ !y, • m o 9a, 0 � _ o /, v 0 � 3 u a mX /' ,J`10" -0 0) 7" ° 3 0 o m - o' /' t. 0 --- — 0 5' FP, a n- 4 /4+ on o • N O 0. g x m + . - p~" § /, _____ Iv D) Q D) —I v _ ° m` p / a—m t _ ,t m � ° O ° D ° tt —_ �,, trR Q CD `. C) 4di G .p W(0 N G) O cD O -,° D ED- U) 0 (D 0 ° N to 7 Sti, r 0 ..— ,,, ° , O Z N , y W - _ cD CD = _ (D cD 0 p .< 0 N C fD > x x w �• x cn am n � m �' O x ct =c0 = D) `< 0 D) co n c0 c0 0 c0 0. y+K n n lull co v: ° n ° . O n n i a_'`� e0i N 0 =',5. D1 o 0 w 0 0 IT S * m � G . ° O c 7 m D !A i ? N r----*" CDM 0 OF n n cD< (D ° n 3 m‘,.,,,, ,.„) 0)_ O X . Ud Q = y rn 4) � _� W 0 ° nn ° ° N f2� moorn o \C',4 �. � o � v y u; o� � n T. FAQ, ND -� /' O 3 ac FA y v o0 U ow.a f D ° m w 5 .. 4 ..<p " rt ami ,- � a y m m m - �� -In a r 0 a c�i 0900 -CI a)= o o °- m c a o » $ � m �' a co 0 co(A 7C cD D) 7■i... CO I r 0 Z 5 3 ° ao -Im' �j7 o U `gmd �' -ox ° O y »� X � m ado - ao o w w ° o ° a5 cD ' 0 ei g 0 cD p o 0) a T. ty ,,�,, 0 3 a .� x$ m m o NNsp m y o m m � ° � V , c_ Q ° =4 00 • m s$ m —i Z fn co 0 .. n) m C) O CD y 3 O p NH = (D Donna Frostholm From: Suzanne Martin [septicbysuzanne @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:27 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: MLA13-00125 Attachments: stream soil wetland seismic.jpg Good Morning Donna, Hope you had a good weekend! Here is the county website jpg from when i did my research on the above mentioned spaad. As you can see, the N stream to the South is greater than 50' from the Southern parcel. We will have the remainder of the corrections to you very soon. Thank you, Suzanne "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." --Ghandi ,.y g ,.. i r / . ` V r § 0 0, \ , ..„„- .,--- ... ),- 1,,,,i, 0 OP . g il il... '''' ,,,. x g fl N F xg� 0 . ' ., _,.. ... ., .i. .„1- 9 .:..,..,..,,r,i.. ...,:..,,,I.4 fi. s u --AcT. ..rx..1---,4,....--gy.,,,,,,,, ,,,,pk.o", r,„,,A.:...,.,,,t,.„,,„t4..L.,:,5;474::!::,„$:,„ltf,,t:',5,:,:,4itiiii.tif,j,;;!;:;,Sfr ::., . ., ,„...„.„..1...,,w.„. .. „„...„,fe...,.. ,,4,44,;=,',4'''e 1,,,,,,,,,,,iro_, r x 4'' , Aveill Donna Frostholm From: Terry Duff Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:13 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: MLA13-00125/ZON13-00042 - 1192 East Quilcene Rd Donna, gravel) since it does not appear to have been used in quite some time. According I ha ve reviewed the access for the above SPAAD and have found that the access the itle plan, it is located on(adding refore should the location of this access change, Public Works will require further review. I have signed off on line,the , the RAP activity in the ZON case. r;ny 04 Eng.Tech III Jefferson County Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend,Wa 98368 360-385-9159 1 lir Cbo. JEFFERSON COUNTY "'LO N) (.3 -42/ s DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 [C [ II�I L� 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax D * www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment lj SEP 1 1 2013 Master Permit Application M14. J Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): JEFFERSON COUNTY SPAAD Application to determine building envelope for future homeug0mMUNITYDEVELOPMENT Tax Parcel Number. 701 184 019&020 Property Size: +/-51661 sf (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 1192 East Quilcene Road-Quilcene, WA 98376 Property Owner(s)of Record: AMK Properties(Ann Kittredge) Telephone: 360.765-3640/477-8778 Fax: email: Mailing Address: PO Box 763-Quilcene, WA 98376 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)-- ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** 0 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: di DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate > 4 24 v///.P Mays I y. to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE 7,t,frt Date: /^,'- By signing this applicati form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staff's access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the applicati.- at he ors _• •nor •tice. Signature: '" _ ,/�j/ Date: /3 IV The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfe a ponsibi 'm ' f r ring t nd complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disci er and signs an dates it below. Signature: L� i1 Date: .2--.27/. G:\PemutCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc ,,,.iar BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: .t EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing:. ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well 0 Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Protect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(indudes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation pe rmit.mark all items below that apply: I Underground Tank I Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: 1 Heat Stove i Cook Stove i Woodstove i Fireplace Insert I Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes I. No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. S ware Foota.a Current • •.osed a11} �t ter,, P �� li,� a,€ ,v , ' 4� ,„ _ .. Main Floor Heated ` ' , , EH Bid App Review: c�h (� 1666sf duplex _ Jv JO 2"0 Floor Heated ,. Consistency Review: F e Base fee: S3 2-Other Heated 57Asf home ;z =� i i Mezzanine "t ° Additional Section: Heated Basement lkq Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement ,'';`N State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated '-,�r ', Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport .... '4,�. SUBTOTAL Decks � 911/Rd Approach fee: 145sf covered deck dup. ka�r u. t.; ,gi n ,,aia, Other 185sf deck home " � TOTAL: $ S�,W' ' Receipt Number. !42(,i "5 -..7 i z `` ,� Cash/Check Number: eikk ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: ail/�f (2, .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish _LI Initials: • G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc PlikParcel#701184019/020 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 SHERIDAN ST.. PORT TOWNSEND.WA 98368. (360) 379-4450 it, , SOIL EVALUATION "44:::1+.,,, AMK Properties `Kitt Kittredge) : ' \\, P g ) 514,.., . , PROPERTY OWNER ' Suzanne L Martin ,+ _■.+• GU@ 1 !t SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin EX""wins LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 18 Township 27N Range 1W Parcel it 701 184 019/020 Subdivision Name Tx 36&tl K(No 1/2&So 1/2 Division Block Lot(s) Date Logged: 12 July 2013 Logged By: Suzanne Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the depths at which significant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers occur. SOIL LOG #1 SOIL LOG #2 0 to 12 in. Dark brown gravelly loam 0 to 9 in.Dark brown gravelly loam 12 to 18 in.grey brown loam w/faint mottles 9 to 20 in.yellow brown loam to 18+ in.grey mottled sandy loam - to 20+ in,dark grey brown mottled sandy loam to in. to in. Anticipated water table 14 in. Anticipated water table 20 in. Roots to 16 inches Roots to 20 inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments SOIL LOG #3 SOIL LOG #4 0 to 18 in. Dark brown gravelly loam 0 to 18 in. Dark brown gravelly loam&loam 18 to 28 in. yellow brown very gravelly fine sand to 18+ in. mottled loam to 28+ in. grey brown mottled gravelly sand&loam to in. to in. to in. Anticipated water table 28 in. Anticipated water table 18 in. Roots to 28 inches , 10 r Q V c� Roots to 18 inches Health Dept. Comments ! Health Dept. Comments P J _ 1I fl' SEP 1 1 2013 SOIL LOG #5 1 LI IA 1 SOIL LOG #6 to in. JEFFERSON COUNTY to in. DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. Anticipated water table in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to inches Roots to inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:IINFOHLTHISOIL.FRM 1/00 Date Additional Information Routing Sheet ��,�SUIN coc Requested by JC Staff `'= From: ci The.v7-i✓l Phone 5 Sir o Z Z-9 ssNr�e�o x Check included? $ S36 Regarding: Parcel Number k) i 1 $ 1 U ici a- C:›2.0 Address i i Z L=a5 r Ot.) / /Zc/ Case Number SEP 1-C)- 0 Avii , Case Number BLD Other Case Number/s This is being submitted for the following reason Submitted for the following Application/s or Case MUST check all that apply MUST check all that apply #of Copies Redesign/Revision Septic Case(SEP) 3 Technical Assistance (1 copy) Building permit(BLD) 7* Record Drawing/asbuilt(1 copy) _ '' SPAAD 4* Monitori icet- as Vot Subdivision (includes BLA) 7* D I Renewal i Other case type- 7* Other(pr ' etaiSEP 1 1 2013 p JEFFERSON COUNTY *I Submittal is larger than 11"X 17" submit 4 copies of those sheets Comment: DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT l v = m L.,.............._ za5�,., ` ;co. , \ v 1, -0rn m I+ ^• (A mr ni - \ o 0 o co x X -0 0Sx m-_ A m UU( \ O C 7 A 6 fA CD 7C •\ y O O A C a n ..2 CL m i:1i < �/ \!v c m \ cnnm3 y _ to 0 J IV \\ N N A cD- I+ 7 13 S _ (D (D \' ' x < X fD \ lB.. D O � y \I SS 7 O0 \ r co - -, O lit f / X p. O CO 2 O \ i = ♦ O N N A \co. A i ,.00 0 0 0 iNiiiii 7:4!+\ .� \ m o o .8%\ ` f. fi t. ````` CD TY' CT co cr 2 \,`i,,,,s;i* ''':''''NI I k.11,1 I I t:NI:,‘,.4 k.k:i ot,..,,t;:‘,to H N,..40,744,,,:::::,:ii,i kliglls‘,/441A\4 4 4,\N-L., 1,..'‘644141%.'''''.:14111\':r:lb*‘'6:4 ' plCi. . '141;—=:16::!1; f4e-'.4440,41;41%::'40. AN. ' '1' 94 \ N. ‘/ o \ \ S '.'* %.d,.1 lbr it., 's ii"si 4::::1646.4'1/4,, \\.-:....• 1 s .. Et . z \t'viv . \ a 0 M1_ \ 3 a ci �`� � vv \\N,.. \\ + O O N V \ p N c V. _ .\ 7 '. \ V.... tP4h.. INik■, . \ o 5' . -1\. ,...y- :L...\'','Ilk, 0 6 co LS HI co y X \ \ w 11.. ` t c„. a) 3 0 co * ,-:... z \ \ I -*\:\ X\11 ki % ',i liAll 1111. 03 * Fn v m CL moo ° " \\::\\N"--,,,,,...„..____\\:1, � -� / •v O c y °: m 4111P" f f v° ((n7" 03 0 0 v x o_ /' ` CD 0) g ,`n 4, \\\\ .„,___-1.:(1)-"c1)-,,,, / N. /� Hill . y ' 121 .C) . U1 N A A W ° N n 7' O \- Cr. ; N q � ° \ C\ p O p; p O O p ° " 3 ° 0m p a � � II scnpCDcnCo co 3.g co iUcc a �N g v. m co g ° oco CA. ° y m Dcn O < 0 0 DOi O N n 0 < (D cp a p u, . ten 3 v °1 w UD 0� � m p 7' -.1 A � •9 y p ID 5-5:V S3 � cD — ,.,. cD x W It O x 7'� y ° N Cl-- 0 - O p) y u m 0 •CD 0 p CO m Co CO N I H p D N N r a ID� m � p p A n �m � cD 7 O (.0 C ° • m 0900 .y -0 ° � o f° Ooh m� Fm �o o 0 Ir. ti. A Ililtil " ,„. to m z �. — v° m om �+ °° m m m n m 0 33CL ,,� x> > m m. N N 0 O N cr 3 x I ' ) When recorded return to: Name: Ann(Kitt)Kittredge I � I SEP 1 2013 Address: PO Box 763 J Li l City: Quilcene JEFFERSON COUNTY State,zip Washington 98376 i DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantor(s): AMK Properties (Ann Kittredge) Grantee(s): Jefferson County NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO AMK Properties (Ann Kittredge) his/her heirs and assigns, and the general public. This restrictive covenant shall bind and restrict the land, the Owner(s), their heirs, grantees, successors and assigns and shall "run" with the land into perpetuity. DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY AFFECTED: Tract A & Tract B of Survey V 9 pg 61 Lot(s)Tax 36&tI K(No&So 1/2) Block(s) Div. of Section 18 ,Township 27N ,Range 1W WM ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 701 184 019 & 701 184 020 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the combination of the above referenced description of real property (lots, parcels, etc) is required for issuance of an onsite sewage system permit. Sale, transfer or other segregation of only part of the property described in this Notice and in the onsite sewage permit will result in a violation of the terms and conditions oLthq onsite sewage permit. TYPE OF STRUCTURE: up ex; nome; toandation ADDRESS OF STRUCTURE: 1192 East Quilcene Road-Quilcene, WA 98376. THIS NOTICE may not be lifted or removed without the consent and written approval of the Jefferson County Health and Human Services Recording. Upon its execution, this Declaration shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. All contracts and deeds or other instruments of convenyance relating to the property or any part thereof shall contain reference to this covenant. Compliance with code requirements. This Declaration does not amend or modify, nor is it intended to amend or modify any requirements of the County's ordinances or any other law or regulation dealing with or affecting the use of land or construction of improvements upon lands. Warranty of Authority. The owner(s) signing below warrant that they are the sole Owners in fee of the real property described above and are authorized to make this Declaration and so bind the property. GRANTOR(S) �fo" Ann Kittredge (AMK Properties) Acknowledgment: • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this"5day of AK-1 ,20 401P 4 g_ Nota` u•lic dipperthe State of Wa.hington, in „Alt TL .�►' pS�`l A. ...S4/, g �/ ashington. `tip � ,..........•�, i My commission expires:,/, r-,2,011.1 CO •Oj AR) S . 71- /11 T� p 2JOf13 W 1111P1o�'`'�\\O PUB •, ' • TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 IOC-SHORT IOC-SHORT by Various EPA Approved Methods Source/Point of Entry-Report of Analysis Date Collected: 1/6/2014 Group: Private System ID No: Private System Name: Kit Kittredge Lab-Sample#: 01094702 County: Jefferson Sample Location: Well-Dipped DOH Source No: Sample Purpose: 0 Date Received: 1/6/2014 Sample Composition: S Date Analyzed: 1/7/2014 Send Report To: Ann Kittredge Date Reported: 1/9/2014 P.O.Box 763 Sample Type: Pre-treatment/Raw Quilcene,WA 98376 Collected By: Kit Kittredge Phone Number: 360-477-8778 Bill To: Ann Kittredge P.O.Box 763 Quilcene,WA 98376 DOH# Analyte Results Units i SRL Trigger MCL* MCL Method ' Exceeded (Analyst Init.) =20 . Nitrate-N ----- 1 0.42 mtr/L ; 0.5 5 10 I. J EPA 3.09441,0/1__ 21 L __Chloride 11.4__.... � 20 1._-- 250 1 ._ EPA_ 000(KW). SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples.Contact Y our regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.00x): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. • The 0.010 mg/L MCL for Arsenic is for Group A NTNC systems. All other systems should check with their county Health District to determine what level is applicable. r if JAN 2 7 ?0',4. JE, LRSCN COUNTY L._-__UPT.O COV NITY DEVELOPMENT 137947 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C S S Poulsbo,WA 98370 ANALYTICAL,INC. (360)779-5141 AA COLIFORM BACTERIA ANALYSIS Date Sample Collected Time Sample County Collected II DAM Month Day year : 0 PM Type of Water System(check only one box) 0 Group A D Group B 0 Other Group A and Group B Systems—Provide from Water Facilities Inventory(WFI): ID# System Name: Contact Person: Day Phone:( ) Cell Phone:( ) Eve.Phone:( ) FAX:( ) Send results to:(Print full name,address and zip code) SAMPLE INFORMATION Sample collected by(name): Specific location where sample collected: Special instructions or comments: Type of Sample(must check only one box of#1 through#4 listed below) 1.0 Routine Distribution Sample 2.Repeat Sample latter unsatisfactory routine) Chlorinated:Yes No 0 Distribution System Chlorine Residual:Total Free 0 Source Groundwater Rule(GWR) (Population of 1,000 or less) 3.Raw Water Source Sample 0 E.coil—GWR source sample Unsatisfactory routine lab number: 0 Fecal—Surface.GWI,some springs LJOther Unsatisfactory routine collect date: HI 11 Chlorinated:Yes No putilesystems num proviilesctrnorterfrom WFI I 1 r - Chlorine Residual:Total Free LP 4,0 Sample Collected for Information Only JA N 2 7 2014 1. Investigative. Construction/Repairs Private Residence. Other LAB USE ONLY DRINKING WATER RESULTS LAB USE ONLY L 0 Unsatisfactory Total Coliform Present and IT]Satisfactory JEFFERSON COUNTY O OF COMMUNITY OFVFFOPMENTI E.coli present 0 E.coli absent DEPT. Fecal coliform present 0 Fecal coliform absent Replacement Sample Required: 0 Sample too old(>30 hours) 0 TNTC 0 0 Improper Container 0 Turbid culture Bacterial Density Results:Plate Count /ml. E.co!i /100m1. Total Coliform /100m1. Fecal Coliform /100m1. Method Code: Date and Time Received' MICR- 2730 Date Analyzed: Date Reported: Sample Number(oat number plus five thous) Lab Use Only: 0 1 0 - DOH Form#331-319(revised 11(10) Lab revision 0413 ■ ,. ,„,„„.,. 1;''''A':,,,,'''''''i':'-'1::::..:.,:„:-- t x : c , a a -- a y ,,4:-' p . . ,,... - ; ..... . il ' . ,,........ , ...,,,, f I ..- .,...- .. .. . ,47.1k,' -•:'''. ,..,, .....,...., ,-....., „, . , 4, ..„, -......„—...._ • . . ., ... . *$' 1'. '''''.•' ; -':, . , —,',.‘,irtl..1".'.1 t. ., . : - 4. *‘I '.4.i''''''I.:; *''':::4':.*:: &*,' '.,.''' .^* ..i„....,-,...,:_.;,:-:,,,,,,!----, t.....,,:.;-...,..,...,.-, :,,:.1.1.,-;.i .,,- .-4 ,.:-1..-,...:i...t.,-.4..,„, ''.7:..:...*';:':,''..-.':-:','- ,,io,:' , ' '- '1,.,; '.;''''''',..„: '':',.':,?•:- '."-'''„,:lik ' ' ''''''•''''' '..1'''' ,1 -....r ..i..,,,,,H.,_'!f---'•:, i'--4:,*'.!-.41:Yii"' .......-,iik,. .... 4,--'-:.,lz,,. ,i....‘„, -',„.i.,,,,, 4„.„7..)-iit,„ ...„.T,,,,, ...„....,..„ ,',, -• 0: „ ;.1:4,ltiile. k"4*';:',".,:.""`?„..-,".t.;4! ‘ i'*".•'11piek"'' .:, ..:"'", t,-;4. 44 1..":','*,-''',.''''''*- -aw -- . . ,,_ ..4,* .•-,,,- -1.7 - .,. ' 4 7 1-.44./....." ;',...,?'.,:." ,,. I,4.,' = ,, ' i P i , ; ,. .14.;kir'. . ikk-t7 4,-:,:*-:$4.7.'k*'4.- '''' '''.4 ' ,. .,. 7,,,.... ,. „-*„ .. ..4,4,131„,.s.,,.„..,...:f1„,,,t,....,:::,,,,.„,-.„. .„.. ... 7. ,...7; . ... .. , -.(.. .,-.."'.;!...:- .. ,,,,. - , , ~ . i '-:: ' ... .,7-, ..i .!. '.,.'-..i.„ .44') .. .. .., l''..,-,1 . -'- .......... irc: '' '4", ...4, :-.:::.,.... . ,-, '. Ig.i:;..i.' k'*;i","',! ''''::';:i' ..; ''''''' 1: 4. ): ''..,:;1 '.i?It',.',1--...!--:'.,....=:)::';';' 1 ti-- ''''''- li• "*. ' _ — •.'''',4;41.. , • 'kti` -.. ',....7,'. .:4'i . *,' , „ ,'..,;•-,'. 4 , ,-,4;t4ii,.. .:4:',4.ik.::::,•.,-,444:4:,,,,q, ..•:-4.,..t.;7:41,74k. .',...4,,,..,:t;:i;,,,L::,r,',:::: , !..1,...i: .., - , ,..riiit -.14 4,.......,„_, :::- ----„, -.•1::::".,..",.11.1.!..t...";:,,,.."7:—.4"''':...,!;"7, . ,.... •.'..-',''' ... Ityl.!,..,.., ..'..... ..., , - .-,i7-'.• • ,...,..,,,,4,- _, !4 .",J...,---.. -,',.. , ...,,,,,,,,..:::,::... ,,,-....:i ,:: ,,,, , ., ,-. -,,,.,„:.-''','.e.7.,74,,,Z;.,:. . ..,.t. .::,:-„,.„. ?'',•-. 7..0:..,0;e.71:-.:-"-.,'; Me k. P:',"AP.p),71 4,4 4-1 kA;,..!!",,,,,„'::::?',...tit''''',-,,,14:**44°,',1*.ill..;:.-'; , ' , k g: -;..,, (*tk,7't(14,,...*7''. , I,4„''.* 1'1' f, ' tk7,f,-'140:191"; .44.i:'i 4, *::::Tt.. ''..‘i'4--p. 41?"'-':4-,. ..,'"*t.'' '''t•-*11,i1.':;;11'::::..k. , ' , )" 41* ;Pi.,. '" ;i1'„*.::, .1,.:°. p: .,,....P.."4 4' ,.."'"4•4!. ,,j,Z., . :::,. .,;.,,' ,n'.* ,;',,,,,',,,.'it,'1..,:=..: „ic..::;:". '17", ..,..:3,,-7,.?;4 i_,,,,...41.,::::::,,,, ..., ' , ' ,!'It '1 , 7 - 7::, 1:274.4! r...-t: --It. ',1•4, „...„ ;;A,1:1-4. . ..., .. f,:„.... ,.,. ....; -:0.4. :_..).*, ::‘ --.44:4,,„i,:i. 4,i7'4,-• .II.... ,, , - ''),.., --: ..,.,-44-,,•• ... ,4":1 f•":':'. , 4 "ti**1;.1-",*-i4::-.7. all. ' „t, .'. •,,li ,.. ,,. -'' 1.,,,...r.„::::.',...,'t......„.t.,: 4.. - . •'.,` k. ii. . -, AO, . ......„ ., , .. ,. .. , . .„ . . . . ......... .. , .. . .. _ ,. ,. , .... , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET AMK PROPERTIES I LLC MLA13-00125 Date Time Comments IO 2)o -r ii%�A i :L' 1 .1.,il i 10 '1A - 1 r), i-Ill . A. 0 u .. h t.' ` ° , I 4. AIIi i, _J ti ((-S17-2 ►, t . hi CA( Vitt 0.- ( - ( o (11 /7 d `,t (40' Lek:ell - 2-' ((-( 0( 5-k \III\A-Ur)( t)1/4-11 f 4 t 2‘,71-1. it4 D ,. ck vgb,,,,,ouryrr:1662 I-, � `�A AALAr AAtAJAA . 4 .11u \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt September 16,2013