Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZON2013-00046 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS PO BOX 71661 CLIVE IA 50325-0661 DATE ISSUED: October 28,2014 DATE EXPIRES: October 28, 2019 MLA NUMBER: MLA13-00135 PROJECT PLANNER: Donna Frostholm PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Plan Approval Advance Determinaion (SPAAD) for new single-family residence PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number: 976200106, Section: 33, Qtr Section: NW1/4, Township: 30N, Range: 1E, Site Address: 2530 E Marrowstone Rd., Nordland, WA CONDITIONS: 1.) The project proponent shall apply for and obtain a building permit prior to beginning any work approved under this SPAAD. 2.) The applicant shall apply for and obtain a septic permit prior to beginning any work approved under this SPAAD. 3.) The applicant shall apply for a shoreline exemption for single-family residential development at the time of building application. 4.) The applicant shall demonstrate proof of potable water at the time of building application. 5.) The shall show compliance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology 2012) at the time of building application. 6.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 7.) MANDATORY MEASURES OF HIGH RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 8.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR HIGH RISK SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: a. Variance from Chapter 173 WAC standards granted by Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea-salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline); or for an existing or proposed groundwater well not subject to an Ecology variance, applicant must provide evidence through a hydrogeologic assessment(relevant components of an Aquifer Recharge Area Report per UDC 3.6.10.e) of a reasonable probability that the subject aquifer will not be degraded by the proposed use of well. b. Installation of a flow meter. c. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. d. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the County per monitoring program. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 9.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 10.) Construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffers for the geologically hazardous area or the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 11.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 12.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 13.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 14.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5)year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 15.) Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in rural residential districts are subject to the stormwater requirments in Chapter 18.30 JCC and must meet the "Area of Impervious Surface Coverage"to the maximum extent practicable, as determined by the administrator. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious susrface, which includes rooftops, driveways, concrete, etc. 16.) The setback from East Marrowstone Road is 20 feet, the setback from adjacent residential parcels is 5 feet, and the setback from the shoreline is 60 feet. The 150-foot fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer and setback is being reduced to 132 feet along the north property line and 124 feet along the south property line; therefore, the waterward development shall be no closer than 72.7 feet from the top of the bluff. 17.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 18.) Native vegetation within the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer is re-establishing. The applicant shall not alter or remove vegetation within the buffer. This SPAAD permit does not authorize the removal of vegetation within the reduced buffer and the approved HMP provides for the permanent protection of the reduced buffer. 19.) The applicant shall implement the approved HMP that was prepared by Marine Surveys and Assessments (dated September 15, 2014) at the time of building application. THE APPLICANT SHALL INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING ALONG THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE (AND AT LEAST 72.7 FEET FROM THE TOP OF THE BLUFF). THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT DCD TO REVIEW THE LOCATION OF THE ORANGE FENCING PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY ON THE PROPERTY(360.379.4450). FAILURE TO CONTACT DCD PRIOR TO GROUND DISTURBANCE MAY RESULT IN DCD ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS FOR ANY ALTERATION OF THE FORESTED HABITAT OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. The HMP must be fully implemented prior to receiving a building final certificate of occupancy. BUILDING FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE HMP IS FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND APPROVED BY DCD. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) This site plan approval advance determination (SPAAD) is for future construction of a single-family residence along Admiralty Inlet. The shoreland designation in this area is Conservancy. This permit vests the proposal to shoreline requirements in JCC 18.25, but is not a shoreline permit. The applicant shall apply for a shoreline exemption for single-family residential development at the tiume of building application. 3.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff for the potential presence of Critical Areas under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following Critical Areas were confirmed to be present on the subject property: geologically hazardous areas(unstable recent landslides, seismic hazards, and high landslide hazard); fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (listed species in marine water); aquifer recharge areas (special aquatic recharge protection area and susceptible); and seawater intrusion protection zone(high risk). 4.) Special Reports were submitted for this application to address geologically hazardous areas. A report prepared by Zenovic&Associates (dated October 5, 2009)was submitted. This report recommends setbacks from the top of the slope of at least 100 feet. Subsequent to this, two reports prepared by Stratum Group(dated March 3, 2014 and April 21, 2014)were submitted that stated the geologically hazaradous area setback needed to be at least 50 feet from the top of the bank. DCD approved a site plan based on the Stratum Group report, and required a Hold Harmless be recorded at the Auditor's Office (586180). A Special Report was also submitted to address an administrative buffer reduction to the 150-foot fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer(and 5-foot building setback). The applicant is to implement the mitigation described in the Marine Surveys and Assessments Habitat Management Plan (HMP), dated September 15, 2014. 5.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 6.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industria Land Uses (2)All Commercial Uses (3)All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(4)All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 8.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 9.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 10.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 61-02, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter (mg/L). 11.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 12.) The site plan, as submitted with the SPAAD application on October 20, 2014, has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 27, 2014 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 13.) This approval is for a SPAAD for a single-family residence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 14.) The parcel has been designated as Rural Residential One Dwelling Unit per Five Acres (RR 1:5) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 15.) The property is located at 2530 E Marrowstone Road. 16.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of Article VII, Chapter 18.40 JCC. The criteria for approval is as follows: 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment: The parcel is approximately 0.64 acre in size. The site plan, as submitted on October 20, 2014, complies with Jefferson County Code Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. This application is for a Site Plan Approval Advance Determination to eventually construct a single-family residence. Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health reviewed the application and approved it based on the site plan received October 20, 2014. This SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow due to the application, as proposed, would require the applicant to connect in with the Marrowstone Island water supply. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for permitting. Application of a Coordinated Water System Plan for fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source and storage. The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water. Access to this parcel is off of East Marrowstone Road. The approved site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070 require the applicant to prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion, and sediments during construction; address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction; and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. At the time of building application, a stormwater plan in compliance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington shall be submitted. If the proposal cannot meet the prescriptive requirements of the Stormwater Manual, an engineered stormwater plan shall be required. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21C RCW. Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four(4)dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 17.) Any removal or disturbance of soil in the area evaluated may create site conditions that are unacceptable for the installation of an onsite sewage system and may invalidate this approval. 18.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage system design or capacity approval. Soils evaluated 1/20/10 under MLA09-114 19.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species(defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments, are included as "critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. �MIII G c,e3 'Jbz∎ — _ vet .ST Adm istrator MLA13-00135 Pag06-0-P 5 -o \` cn 0 N CD o\ ▪ X \ cr N \ c W 0 co C Q /) 1 `.� eASr • w o \ ARROWSTONE ROAD n3i * 7 q c°'c WEST PROPER•CD LINE i+ M. / 0.4 4 .j . 4S■\\\ ,4 4/*.;::..,\ ■ ' • IF: , i 40 I+ a'• . - ' co `co \NO, ts) o 3• ...-. °''— OR•--, " .-.•- 4,E rte- ":tn a,e Vi I o btDcs *:c :-a 7 ci) 0 , ��4 r c I:ii w ha, 0 . ���It 40,p coto �3 =``` : ao• iii. 92' .� �4 co iu S d -8v 'D 5. - 2 3 o Nx m CD<?, o 3^w 3 2 d •5 3 ymyaw-o= damt° @ °,-*,.< �• Oc ,6Z 0,-z < o> m m a m m m d_ an d 2 z co o aa�wco co cu d ° f m —a o d 0 40_1 n c0,C 0 8 m y 7 CD *{ N=m m X O j t? O N n D) N N O �'N M N C ^. 0 Q I .y. l 7 fD CND >•E.0 7 f N 7 7 N M Z n —M N O 0 N tD .iii+ N K C toil C a tD m 0 m •.) O N mMdmm� v ° agmgv ^am �a@. m P. °.FT;_ 4 o fD003yga � oomm� o3mm `�. I� N 1s 3 m,% tD� 'o ' aE o 3 w a �� � Z ai 4i .0..< O O O 2 ? tr, y m 0 a w m m 6°n m a v° o m rJ o 0 3 < a m 3 tD�y 3 y ton "0; Fo ct 3 �p (0(p n 0= 5p•aa to o ,„(J...-' m tD 0 c v a ,• 3 a N 0< '_, 3 N N N CD :R 5 N u a g-o�• 0 °•�N in m m Jr 3 p . .. n 3 � <wv ° a od (��� y ( ��c t0 CD 7 Cp N GI G1 f5D a, 0 o 7 7 co7m �• m 0 03 _ S_i, / CD al X:0• N '<N t3D 7 7 a 0 C 7 O N 7 —e0 O CD a3• av �w '.- o f ° Oo * O Gib � _ cn j °- zro H ri g, 0 n r mp'\a IIJ1 ` 7 � \ � ' r-1 da + G r+ z! � cyi 1 e v m O 01 K O •-y° y 7 � O O • r z a o CI rci D m < ..O n .n m --1 CD H N D O O N Iffil a 2 r• cn cr, CB su 1m < p to - C A Ui,m ) /O O O C0 � �/ m 6 " a ' T tV�`" s' l�13 tD 3 .a W " Pa a) = V ' . 4ll d O 0 O (7 O � 4WDy � �`� F-. . m Q o c w wo N a m °. pp o �L z ° 0 _ • g. O o v m i� ,SON c9\ JEFFERSON COUNTY ° (o' "t'j DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �-- 1 - �, "'' ` `� 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washingto 98 6 p / / )�I 360/379-4450 - 360/379-4451 Fax �� ! ' Nip www.co.jefferson.wa.us/eommdevelopment 2D C ,II c � CP Master Permit Application (L 0 MLA: — I SS 1 Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): �, SS.F. 4.A> r�Ai t,4 Tax Parcel Number: 974- 2.00 - r 1 4 to Property Size: 1 (acres/s• - -- Site Address and/or Directions to Property: A� 25"5-0 6, t4arrovi s4,, . V2-6. riOoat.,Nvt - t)/r- Property Owners)of Record: EL..:All. L. eel tile+`oovitt Telephone: Si S- 3 2.1 - 2.0 I- F.x: ,_ email: Te&,n e+1t et-4%4e Ao.rtb�SQe •Mailing Address: Q O GO V. 7((,(. t ho-Ftta,i r.. Gorr Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): -e we-1 M e (.{.4,14. ' Telephone: 17g •- 4 ST 0 Fax: 3 9,S ''''Li 1 et 1. email: }•+04 e.. O(y oevl•(4041 Mailing Address: V d 80 tc `4 4 % Pe w"r °p W.4547v18- WA- What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship -ii ❑ O Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or R ; 64,E, )/I(� I Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a), C(d) .• U vV LS O Manufactured Home .❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnam Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Pub i '=•lities ** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment I OCT 9 2013 114ylAAt�b .i ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** L'S—Ho_me Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑ Propane ❑Long Plat** _ JEFFERSON COUNTY ❑ Sign ..- ❑ Planned Rurai ResidentialtDe ••i ► p is** • ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑ Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** *ASite Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate i~mod` 14.-(4v L : to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE ." -/1__, �i— A—.�-'� Date: 1J2i0,0/3 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. l further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access a t of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the app' -,L.e' •at he or sh prior notice. Signature 1, _ — �. .. ��� •,. ,„,.., - r Date: 122-7x.0/3 The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non transfera•e/�-sponsib' or adhering ,�'d complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disc i er and igns and dates it below. Signature v _ +.',__ _ -_- Date: y A-2.-..20/3 G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Forms\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc ii D N 0 ND EAS) c JUU 8 (0 A � �� \ T PROPER toll WESw � ' 4X- w v) x - 011,R N po • / , x . n • a ----- / 4 = :-. '- • -o 3 t �n a a a 1� 7 3 --- cn °) 3$ r 7 0 m 7. O O. o . . -- Insea. 6 .2-'44. 111 tI p yf 0 . = a a . 0vDst . v , m 3, . . ,l` o N7 ► D a v m' R m$� ►�cn Iwlldbhh1 C c- m 0 B m m 0 m N 0 N -I --_. Z m a-D.500wmmap.m ° 3 -a m g 0 C a C 0 g y Ei m �o5 0 g 8.1. . a m m _m m m a. a• 0 S .... l 3•m m 7' .W 7*L N 7 3 7 F m Z 0 m. 'm'0 w 0 a;m c 0 a a m T� Q ca 3. 1 1 �roo3m '-, mo•omo 0.03mm r -13- A°7�< mg �gv 0°cc3,0 <a m x •,4 ° 1 , o.m m��� 0 c m o-m 0 0 Z g 0 0 7 W 0 0D Cr y 0 .Z m 0 3 3 0 3 < a 0-co 7.,. 645 0 N =0 y Q N 0 f .0 5: 0 a 9 W 7 s (0 ,co m x X a CD c N 7 7_�a a a m 0 f<D • 0 3 0 70C N (yE 3 m $ m' i.-3 m 0- m 0 7 m 3 s5- a0 •. q-m it m m n x m Si o (0/i_ 5 f`<N mi ° 0- . * . . g-00 R I ? c7 m.om00. m mm005 n < N < m m • O o a 0 o 7 3 a y x d x 0 Oo_ * 0 I Li 4Pl "-I,. J `z O .n4;.m if i - s o D v N 0 r0 co w o - r i��ti 5 = o __- t d p�- y n fp 0 CT m v,, 02 0 W r N CO N 7,71-, 2 < t °' o ? ° �i c� Oc * o a _, °' -� � 000 m m Ni, Z'� m 0. o II O d X06 �' • �J 0.)o s' ° 4 U- m foe O � � m ; d -n 0 -, kt, O m n CO y u Z� 00m Emi ' N m 355 m -47,A. \4 • r Susan Porto Jefferson County Public Health 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: ZON13-00046; 2530 East Marrowstone; Parcel#976200106 Dear Susan, A site visit on 21 March 2014 showed that the designated drainfield area conditions have not been altered since ZON09-00135. The test pits and stakes marking them are still in place. There has been some clearing of brush that appears to have been done by hand in this area. There has also been some clearing in the building site area with machinery, however this activity did not infringe upon or adversely affect the drainfield areas. Sincerely, Suzanne Martin or t Imo Applied Septic Design& Service 1' PO Box 179 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 ,' �ov (360)554-0224 '� !, smartin(a)cottonshold.com rk4 rra� 0, . 11 .•`,SUZANNE MARTIN 1 •gio j:L . .E ;c p ' • yi^ 111 li 44 a� \ /4 `fie : � .3 � ,6< § \2 44a6 a J ` � ' � u < A \)4 6 )T 7 > ® \ 1 .- • . 2w . 2,,' E A �at, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i '4# • 621 SHERIDAN ST., PORT TOWNSEND ,WA 98368, (360) 379-4450 i�:-4 t:, 'tt : ��+� SOIL EVALUATION 1,4 7' Suzann Marti n 5.#1 s "t:r rus btsr'•r•Ny-•`• 4} PROPERTY OWNER David Clark exp.2/11/10 SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 33 Township 30N Range 1 E Parcel # 976 200 106 Subdivision Name Nordland Division Block 1 Lot(s) So 100'of No 390' Date Logged: 27 November 2009 Logged By: S. Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the depths at which significant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers.occur. Primary Area Reserve Area; SOIL LOG #1 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG #2 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf 0 to 3 in. Dark brown sandy loam 0 to 6 in,Dark brown sandy laom 3 to 48+ in.Light olive brown loamy sand 6 to 19 in.Yellow brown loamy fine sand • to in. - 19 to 48+ in. Olive brown loamy fine sand to 52 in.water level @ site visit to in. Anticipated water table 42 in. Anticipated water table 44 in. Roots to 40 inches Roots to 39" inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments Reserve Area; SOIL LOG#3 Primary Area; Type 4;0.60 d/sf Type 4;0.60opd/sf SOIL LOG #4 yp gP 0 to 7 in. Brown sandy loam 0 10 Dark brown sandy loam to in. y 7 to 25 in. Olive brown loamy sand 10 t0 16 in. Yellow brown loamy sand 25 to 35 in. Olive brown slightly cemented sand 16 to 41+ in. Olive brown gravelly loamy fine sand to 35 in. Hardpan to 41 in.Water level @ site visit Anticipated water table 33 in. E C FE V I .nticipated water table 33 in. Roots to 35 inches D •oots to 35 inches Health Dept. Comments � OCT 9 2013 ealth Dept. Comments lu Reserve Area; SOIL LOG #5 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf JEFFERSON COUNTY -*•IL LOG #6 0 to 6 in,Dark brown sandy lo.- DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to in. 6 to 18 in.Dark yellow brown loamy sand to in. 18 to 36 in.Light yellow brown loamy sand to in. to 36 in,water table 10 December 2009 to in. Anticipated water table 26 in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to 26 inches Roots to inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:UNFOHLTH1SOIL.FRM 1/00 v b: H o Z' O O © (� O O O O O O r 0O - n1 V) p O N N m O O O O O O O O o Z PC � z 11 g Iu -I ril A � Z C CO CD V) k O CJJ ; k:02 0__. 6-1-1 z.--i n_ y n ZO O r-- r' 0(0 0 -I r j (-4 (.4 I O � )=. (.1 'II y c O O -1 N (4 7=-1 ii----- ?`) a , ,. , ,,) , , n-i CO,, __, _.,.,n1 -o EAST AmRROwSTONE- ° - 1 ei, , z ____________ (,, . , c., red o AA 1:2 -‘011111110,- IV - or- co -0 rrl ��i. N05°40 33'E I o `C i X00 ". 100.41 ®K ( Wr -11 °- � © �,g, � --I (I) 1. '�` �°Co I • ■ r- q) tr*- A ___, Q f c„-u 0) / rri ( i \ tly 1N n'i/ iNk 41 \ ., o 0 CD -z. -0 A ,. ) 11:5 7110-13 ii_ N v - co i O 1 N ti �Z cp o rI Oo �Z rn- c � (n Z O G-37-Z- 1 — O O \�, (s ,I co Gt � C) :1 .5 �- -t- Z � Z m T ---/: T 0 I ZO o O '� O `co 0 V N..)L Y1 (-.1, N c-----...„...........,.. co LomaooK r- . ._ I o N) P.,.ti Z<13 Z _....iiiptLimmu \ C43) N), A 4,, " ,I„ ), oZ N1'3206C �� /CD Iv -0 A . w ti 0 r- �z TT ON• n O n a 1 i ---,— , -.„ 0 0 , ,, 4a So rn Cal N)N) = � � � Z �� rn X01 lk t ° \ P ABM/R,q�/ r o ° � V. xa “ Nos c^i cam., x z - ri -i - SEAWgRD in � � m m m 3 � m z \ p o z �E TERM/NEE TH�SR/ES N�\ P � co = � � _, w m F = 1 I D D N w m o m � `° � �^' z n1 .SURVE-Y o [\/C\fV �_.. m 3 din ∎ mow_�► t 1 . Susan Porto From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:05 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: ZON 13-46/ZON09-135 Donna, I just received the above referenced case from Randy because I was involved in the 09 case and approved the soils for the spaad. I'm confused on what I am doing and why a new site plan was received. The original spaad was approved and is still active until 2015, now we have a new case with a very similar site plan, and I can't figure out what generated it. Talk to me. S Susaw Porto R.S. Je f fersow Couwt j Publ%c Health Phowe 360.3859404 Fax.360. 37.4487 Al,ws woriziwg for a safer_ tteaLtliferJef fersow Couvvt CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the 1 Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 4256. 1 , t ■ • • y 1 R nl E. MARROWSTONE RD. 4 i ! IN �I _ a V 4 d I rn 13 0 pdi 11A to till I 6 Ilil IIIw o , , ,,,,le4,00,...9,, imers,,,tiotot ,,,,,,,4,,,,,,,:, 3i ..,,,,,,„,,,,,,..,..,!,.. iii, ,..,,,I.! I,;c13:,..,.,4,,,,,..„...,:„.7:',....„,,.:=`,1-..''..,..'r',,,,;%. I u I I Q - 11 n O o z i -i +I OSco I `i r z g I . R rn� rr � x _4,00 rn 1 I... lidi 1 jrroiFe cb 1 z 1.1 p 1. ...., 1 !I co 1 ioo' g R. 1 APPROX TOP OF BLUFF g Iz " a �" , Y a O 4, a` , .*.2 ■ P � i,1,,,,-,,i 9a ■ ! 'tcr.- t, YR `'`, ' "" %''s }' 4, � i'�' Ni, d+Sr 4'e;',.a-'',,;. st " d9 T ,a I a, ,\ , ^ RECEIVED JAN 2 6 (999 . — — — __. _1 rn J.C. PERMIT CENTER ADMIRALTY INLET ► & BARRETT SITE PLAN '° m° 1-4 14 i t PRESS. SYSTEM AS BUILT ENGINES I G /� rot I Susan Porto • From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:32 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: ZON13-46/ZON09-135 Donna, I did not receive the application form with the site plan that was routed, can you get me a copy please. I want to call Terry (as I understand from you he is the contact). Do you have his phone number? Below is what I intent to ask for: The following items were noted in review of the site and application and must be addressed prior to further review: EH will need the site plan submitted by Clark Land Office, reviewed by a licensed septic designer or engineer who will then provide a stamped and signed document stating: 1. The site plan was reviewed (reference the date of the most recent site plan submitted and by who) ( .(tests to it's accuracy regarding the area for the primary and reserve,the test hole locations,the well locations/radiuses and that the septic area has not been disturbed. NOTE:the well location and radius shown on the northerly adjoining parcel is not consistent with site plan approved under ZON09-135.` e 3. Verifies that the septic area is appropriate under current code for approval of a new SPAAD. ° Susan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:30 PM To: Susan Porto Subject: RE: ZON13-46/ZON09-135 Susan: Not sure why another application was submitted. It is a new application with a different applicant so I am assuming the property was sold. Possibly a new SPAAD was submitted because the current applicant wants a different building envelope or possibly the new applicant could not build before 2015 but wanted to be vested to the old shoreline regulations???? Donna From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 10:05 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: ZON13-46/ZON09-135 II Donna, I just received the above referenced case from Randy because I was involved in the 09 case and approved the soils for the spaad. I'm confused on what I am doing and why a new site plan was received. The original spaad was approved and is still active until 2015, now we have a new case with a very similar site plan,and I can't figure out what generated it. Talk to me. S Susay.POrto R.S. jef fersoik Cou.Vkt Publ%c ttea�th Pl.owe 360.385:9404 Fax 360.379.448 Alwas Wor{R.v g for a safer f-teaLtKerjeffersow Couwt . 1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended tecipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 2 4) 1) jovuyetApj Ovi •) /to, 5 Susan Porto From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:58 AM „tit To: 'Terry McHugh' / , Cc: Donna Frostholm , Subject: ZON13-46 Rosencrants / 4 Terry, per our conversation just now, below are my comments on the project as referenced above. The following items were noted in review of the site and application and must be addressed prior to further review: EH will need the site plan submitted by Clark Land Office, reviewed by a licensed septic designer or engineer who will then provide a stamped and signed document stating: 1. The site plan was reviewed (reference the date of the most recent site plan submitted and by who) 2.Attests to it's accuracy regarding the area for the primary and reserve,the test hole locations, the well locations/radiuses and that the septic area has not been disturbed. NOTE:the well location and radius shown on the northerly adjoining parcel is not consistent with site plan approved under ZON09-135. 3. Verifies that the septic area is appropriate under current code for approval of a new SPAAD. Let me know if you have questions. Suva in,Porto R.S. jef fersoln.Couwtlu. Pulato Health Pliovt.e 360.3869404 Fax 360.375.4487- ALMA for a Safer ttealthCerje f fersow Couwt j CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 Susan Porto From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:39 PM To: 'Suzanne Martin' Cc: 'Terry McHugh'; Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: ZON13-46 Rosencrants Attachments: [Untitled].pdf Suzanne, per our discussion today regarding the above referenced project: I received a signed and stamped statement from you on 3/27/14 (copy enclosed). Unfortunately,the statement in that document did not completely address the issues I requested. Below is a copy of what was requested. I have added red to the portions not addressed. Please review the site and resubmit a signed and stamped statement that addresses all of the items of concern. If the site plan submitted in 2009 and approved is not accurate, we may need to null and void the approval until the site plan deficiencies are corrected. Thanks, Susan Succl IA,Porto R.S. jeffersovw Couwtu PubLCo f-eaLtl' Phovwe 360. 3859404 Fax 360.3.7j.4427- ALwaus Worl2twg fora safer thterJe f fersow aou.k CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NO'T'ICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RON 42.56. From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:58 AM To: 'Terry McHugh' Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: ZON13-46 Rosencrants Terry, per our conversation just now,below are my comments on the project as referenced above. The following items were noted in review of the site and application and must be addressed prior to further review: EH will need the site plan submitted by Clark Land Office, reviewed by a licensed septic designer or engineer who will then provide a stamped and signed document stating: 1. The site plan was reviewed (date stamped received by DCD on 10/9/13, provided to me on March 18th 2014) 2.Attests to it's accuracy regarding the area for the primary and reserve, the test hole locations,the well locations/radiuses and that the septic area has not been disturbed. NOTE:the well location and radius shown on the northerly adjoining parcel is not consistent with site plan approved under ZON09-135. 3. Verifies that the septic area is appropriate under current code for approval of a new SPAAD. Let me know if you have questions. Susaw Porto R.S. 1 jeffersoik couwtu PubLLG Health Phowe 360.3859404 Fax 360. 37.4487 ° • ALwa js Woriei.wg fora safer H-eaLthierjef fersow couwttj CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 2 . . c PA-A -11 1 , .N 0q JEFFERSON COUNTY UMS -1 Ut�' C%l , . iorf ' DEPARTMENT'OF COMITY DEVELOPM /y'_ ^' 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•W him n 98 8 P - I Cb- ' www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment j ` I -� (06 ' J ` . Master Permit Application I : O `/I t Project Descnp n 00.ude sep to sheets as necessary): Tax Parcel Number: q -7 6,a (5 O 6 i C 1 Pro e: ) 7 > (a square feetl Site Address and/or Directions to Property: t — /. .' • Property Owner(s)of Record: 1 ,1/ici T-= L. 4 r ' Telephone: Fax: email: /Mailing Address: r ° .j 65i su_y_. As 7 3 Applicant/Age if different from o r): _f,1 ��If Telephone: a Fax: email: (. C-�(k I71/ILt , Mailing Address: .,a%.....d `t\-= s AT /4/A..__ - '. I / What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)'" ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments""' ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑ ormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* 0 Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑ emporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or fedefal permits required for this proposal,if known: f 7 / 7 ,DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate i l l. '.�. to act as my agent in matters relating to this pplicati for permit(s).I Ft OWNER SIGNATURE I . it .l�♦ Date: j �/ Y By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,Indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any • -• later' ;pections. Staffs a—- and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant infomf he County i writing at the time of the appl ■`_•that he• she wants p'•1•o'•_ Signature: I , .A At , % . ( iL xi .. Date: / �"` Z:/ The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively imp-fp-pup•0 4ne i()i re threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are delfiin the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been' ed will •• violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if i• are in pliance 'th Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans i •le res•• sibility for,`=9he` • to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer nd signs/ dates it below. Signature: t'J .. r f`ee'Q Date: /2 f / c f G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc f 1 17U6161' $OUNP $OLUTION$ Helping with Permitting in 23 Washington Counties 124 Harrison Street Port Townsend WA 98368 360-385-6860 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter gives my permission to Barbara Blowers to act as my agent in the process to obtain a Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination for my property whose tax parcel number is 976200106 eiv110 Davtlark DEC 2 1 :',„19 i - - ...to JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � . Aa;"t tt 621 SHERIDAN ST..PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368.13601 379-4450 �� .., '•.,.1.tt 2 •SOIL EVALUATION Suzanne L Martin Ott ' TiteNStABESrGNVIk:.It PROPERTY OWNER David Clark exp.2/11/10 SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 33 Township 30N Range 1E Parcel # 976 200 106 Subdivision Name Nordland Division Block 1 Lot(s) So 100'of No 390' Date Logged: 27 November 2009 Logged By: S. Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the deptlhs at which significant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers.occur. Primary Area; eserve Area; SOIL LOG #1 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG # Type 4;0.6Ogpd/sf ` 0 to 3 In, Dark brown sandy loam / 0 to 6 Dark brown sa aom 1/4" 3 to 48+ in.Light olive brown loamy sand 1 6 to 19 in.Yellow brown loamy fine sand 2.' to in. n� 19 t0 48+ in.Olive brown loamy fine sand t0 52 in.water level @site visit v f/ 11 to in. Anticipated water table 42 in. V Anticipated water table 44 in. Roots to 40 inches Roots to 39" inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments Reserve Area; SOIL LOG#3 P mary Area; SOIL LOG #4 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf T e 4;0.60eed/sf� 0 7 rown sandy loam 0 10 Dark brown sandy loam to in. rown In. 7 to 25 in. Olive brown loamy sand 10 to 16 in.Yellow brown loamy sand 25 t0 35 in. Olive brown slightly cemented sand 16 to 41+ in.Olive brown gravelly loamy fine sand to 35 in. Hardpan ■ V 11 to 41 in.Water level @ site visit �(/i r\ Anticipated watee.tabie 33 in. ! Anticipated water table 33 in. Roots to 35 inches Roots to 35 inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments Reserve Area; SOIL LOG #5 Type 4;0.60gpd/s SOIL LOG #6 0 to 6 in.*k brown sa y y to in. 6 to 18 in.Dark yellow brown loamy sand D ,I to in. 18 to 36 in,Light yellow brown loamy sand �J,� to in. to 36 in,water table 10 December 2009 II o� to in. Anticipated water table 26 in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to 26 inches Roots to f EC 2 inclryg Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:lNFOHLTHISOILFRM 1/00 cn m CO o • N. X �.-- - if a N y W � C -13 o \ r/ • � Z. \ / c 0) EAST /m co El c m RROy uroNE ROAD v \ ---"-------"----------/L--------. 3 F \ WEST PROPERT�t' 4 / co cn m ♦���=` LINE' / l 7 / 4 '"Lls` IS.,4 ■4 / , 41,48...,.;•:.,:;.; \ .4 - ..-..- V, ‘....... ss O. o q•3 0-3 ►� . :.1 off: . . ...>".".7 a. a r". ------- ----- Q N D 0 a °' 2 illiAlik%NlillL • ''1118•1111k iti. aci 4 VI 3 gr a A 'N•likk- :ww/t.i. : i-E.: c.:>,..c<cp fD m • p C. ,� `�, ® d �� riP 141 m C W :L...gW -"CD *; v 3 !Wi #1H co H at a3 amro T4t 0 \ �; mgDDm3.is mmNmO m * 2 6Z ► Z m ����N WmNa�cm �m t32 �jn rcdcomco ��=° �' w°c_ c O _ �aHm $'c) mdym' 3 'atco°-' m �+ � � mm � 3y � �gdy� ammo . Val % 4 I L� •7C N a� 5'a38o cQ'o63d; n3i cow �� a � ao o 3 r'n t7) d' m o ° -� o �ma� °c �c°_'omZ -,o co3 '<_<_ awi vym � z_wc � m � m d O 7 d 4,7 N �_7 .N.N x 3 Sr ((pp Cr C "m•"3 e O G N $ < y co N 3 (p x (a lD W O (p B.s3m33 a� C• N 01 tix �c co Lit bl O (y 3 g m y 3 a �y 3 oo m m m re 'O d. A 3 ° gm, m m0, 3t 6. ',`• CDms O m r5 m '< 2 17-- 7 m 3 y c= a OI a E., 0. ,., S_. ________ ,. ., m ,„, . ;, % W�o \..„,, , ,.. . .14-...:Imtsitio g ., s 10. o D al CD 5 v 8 Iwo D w 3� � A rrt ti a 71 M a.1.11. (:)-1:: r*Z D- � N.D ON ni y Gny � N��� y= v(D � d a rn N " ' G r ZN � -p N 5 x m W pODO t--..) ...< m l • c m N`4 o %) -8 s W3 � cu pn , co o � a� X) O) d J NN � m a n o "l r a y z N ` A co r11 o 0 CD 0. m z ? in a • a 9M --I D m m x =m co 0 3 . -- - View / Edit Activity X' lir nw ,t g . 12/22/2009 wg :$ m ' ti m �; µ SFP i soils ok, checked on 1/20/10. Added conditions,waiting for planner to indicate proposal is ok with out changes to site plan. Project in my pending drawer. I::: Susan Porto From: Susan Porto Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:59 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Suzanne Martin Subject: RE: ZON13-00046/ZON09-135 I'll come over to discuss this with both plans so your response is applicable. Suzanne, disregard the prior e-mail from donna. S Original Message From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:30 AM To: Susan Porto; Suzanne Martin Subject: RE: ZON13-00046/ZON09-135 Suzanne: Since SPAADs are not vesting for potable water and development on Marrowstone Island will be required to connect in to the public water supply at the time of building application, I would suggest that you show the location of the well and add a note on the site plan to say that the well can no longer be found. Regards, Donna Original Message From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:48 PM To: Suzanne Martin Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: ZON13-00046/ZON09-135 Suzanne, I am not sure how this works with a spaad that has already been approved and needs revision. Donna, What do you think? S Original Message From: Suzanne Martin [mailto:smartinOcottonshold.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 6:17 AM To: Susan Porto Subject: ZON13-00046 Hi Susan, Sorry for the delay on this. Yesterday I made a site visit to 2530 East Marrowstone. The well that I had on my site plan was not to be found. Measured to the other well and the site plan by Clark is accurate. Do you need me to revise my site plan from ZON09-00135? Thank you, Suzanne Suzanne Martin Shold Excavating, Inc. PO Box 179 1 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 (360) 554 - 0224 cottonshold.com 2 t:,tviLtNVI tN trKCll'lli LAND SURVEtNG 17 1 301 East 6th Street,Suite 1 & ASSOCIATES Port Angeles,Washington 98362 INCORPORATED (360)417-0501 i EO I I E Fax(360)417-0514 I n E-mail:zenovic @olympus.net 1 OCT 9 2013 October 5, 2009 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. David Clark 1599 Highway 169 Winterset, IA 50273-8471 Re: Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA Par. No. 976-200-106 Dear Mr. Clark: Zenovic &Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the east side of Marrowstone Island along Admiralty Inlet, in Jefferson County, Washington. Access to the site is directly from East Marrowstone Road; the site can be reached by following Highway 116 east from Port Hadlock, across Indian Island to Marrowstone Island and then north to Meade Road, east to East Marrowstone Road, and north to the property. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. A portion of the site is mapped as an Unstable-Recent Slides slope on the Jefferson County Shoreline Map and the Washington.Coastal Zone Atlas. Slopes designated as Unstable-Recent Slides are based on evaluations completed in the 1970s Subsequent sliding has not been documented by the State and is subject to our review and conclusions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will not induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website (1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (USDA/SCS, August, 1975), the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, and Jefferson County Unified Development Code. In addition, several boundary surveys of properties located along the bluff to the north and south of the site were reviewed to determine the approximate rate the bluff in this area recedes. Page 2 Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, the lands encompassing Indian and Marrowstone Islands are classified as being in the Whidbey- Dick soils association. Whibdy-Dick soils are characterized as being well-drained to excessively drained, undulating to hilly, gravelly and sandy soils, underlain by glacial till or loamy sand. The Whidbey soils are derived from weathered glacial till. These soils were deposited by the ice sheet during the Vashon stade glaciation. The Vashon Glacial Till consists of a poorly sorted mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashon-age ice sheet. Finer portions of the soil consist of clay, silt, and sand. These fine particles comprise a moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components (gravel, cobbles, and boulders)are firmly imbedded. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic &Associates, Inc. conducted a site vis ° , 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immed: S4-_:4 _1� hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. _y Existing Slopes The property is nearly level extending easterly from East Marrowstone Road towards a marine bluff that forms the east edge of the site. Near the bluff, the upland area gently rises such that the land at the top of the bluff is about 4 feet higher than remainder of the lot. This topography prevents storm water runoff from the site from running over the face of the bluff. The toe of the bluff is situated on the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet. The upper portion of the bluff is a near vertical formation while the lower portion is less steep. The material creating the less steep slope at the base of the bluff is the colluvial material that has eroded from the bluff face due to wind erosion and the natural freeze-thaw cycle that loosens the bluff soils. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently Whidbey soil types as shown on the Soil Survey maps. Inspection of the bluff face indicates that the depth of the surficial gravelly sandy loam is as expected for the Whidbey soils, extending to a depth of approximately 40 inches. TI- - - - : - soils are less stable than the underlying compact glacial till, so - W .+yi. j•]]t ;�� upper area of the bluff face is anticipated. OCT 9 2013 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Page 3 Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 Vegetation Site vegetation consists of a scattering of cedar and willow trees with a dense understory of native rose bushes, sword ferns, salal, salmonberry and nettles and pasture grass in small areas that were previously cleared. A single, broken cedar tree is located approximately 5 feet from the edge of the bluff. Hydrology and Drainage The upland area of the site is basically flat and East Marrowstone Road effectively cuts off any runoff from the west. No drainageways were observed on the upland area of the property or on the face of the bank. International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand, silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for structures within 75 feet of the top of the bank. CONCLUSIONS The bank is shown to be Unstable— Recent Slides in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. This determination is based on review of available aerial photography in the 1970's: review of available photographs and survey data indicates that continued sloughing of the bluff face has occurred. The bluff formation at this site is characterized as a "feeder" bluff. Historically, soils eroded from the bluff are deposited on the beach areas at the base of the bluff and transported from the beach by wave and tidal action. The mechanisms that create this situation -exposure to high tides, storm waves, and poor soil structure—impact the rate of recession of the top of the bluff. Review of the aerial photographs and the measurements comparing the existing conditions with historic data indicate that a rate of recession of the top of the bluff in this area is typical for the area of Marrowstone Island that fronts Admiralty Inlet, ranging from 6" to 10" per year average. This recession is not typically a yearly occurrence, but rather tends to happen less frequently but with a larger impact(see attached information). A loss of 1-2 feet of land at the top of the bluff is not uncommon, but general • _- _ during the years with the most extreme winter weather. E C E I V L OCT 9 2°13 . JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 4 ��, : 1] V � Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson Cb — October 5, 2009 < OCi 9 2013 RECOMMENDATIONS JEFFERSON COUNTY General _,DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The bluff at this site is a feeder bluff that has had an average rate of recession of around 0.67 feet per year over the last 25 years. Assuming a usable life of 75 years for a house constructed to current standards and using a safety factor of 2, a minimum setback of 100 feet is recommended for the site. This setback area should remain free of any site improvements and maintenance should be limited to the trimming the brush as necessary. The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches feet below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 125 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. Slope Maintenance The existing broken cedar tree at the top of the marine bluff is dead and has the potential to cause a premature failure of the top of the bluff in high wind conditions. The tree should be removed by cutting it off at the ground line. Do not disturb the root system. Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System Drainfield If an on-site sewage disposal system is required for this site, the on-site sewage disposal drainfield shall be located as far as practical from the shoreline, but shall be not less than 125 feet from the top of the bluff. Page 5 Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 The drainfield shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the permit for the system, as approved by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. Septic tanks, pump chambers, and collection and transport piping shall be placed not less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. All systems components shall be water-tight; piping within recommended setback area shall be tested for leaks prior to cover. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. David Clark for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a steep bank on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein is the property of the Mr. Clark and may not be used without I y ut his permission. The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely, Zen i vic&Associates, Inc. t phen M. Zenovic, P.E. Pr ncipal Engineer Enclosures Fc: JN 09223 Cc: Waves Waterfront Properties/Barbara Blowers w/enc. ■� \ �° � �,�i no o 9 23 i3 COUNTY L 0,5„ ofiEcyof,\E,RmsuoNN TY DEVELOPMENT _____...._ . ._....... Page 1 of2 i 1 . . . '1 • • ----_... 02 =23 F: • ------:. . ,- 13 . , , . 021332024 1 . , I ; 021332006 i 1 1 i I ii.-_-2, ----, , ? , , 9762001M .__......" ' / . 976200101 ,.. ' - , f ,:i l'•:'?! ; 'e . ` A. \ f f : 976200109 ' I 1 976203107 t,.„. : . -— /A. ,,, f ; -,. ___. ..,_ _ -... ,-._2.....L., F " f I F.. N ■ I I:...j , 976200110 , , # ' 9762001M \,.3 le4 H r , ,..., '-,,.._.? / i --._ , , ------•-.._, ----,_ f . ...._..„ . . . ? ' _ _ 97620(1 06 , Li 1.a. . i. . . , . ,' I -: ...--• I ? ( T ii ; ii 1 970 102 03 '::,.,,,,,,,,,•-:-„,::: • ,r, , ; • ., , .. 1, 976200112 ", ( ! (..-----) i iff I i I .1 i I ; I ,,---- . / iii I i i ,.-,...,- I i -----------------• ,. J i :' e i i 976200104 : f ' ..., 1 1 e7,) ,, 1 V -----' to.ii ! ____ .ce ,...__________ ,I..,11,1/ / 976200201 f___ _7-9762,j060/97620014 i i II ,1 iti /1 1 I t t 976200601 I?Lti i .f u ' 976200609 / f '' — -1 fi I 11. : $ : i 444 ' h l'' / ,.: I ff if i i i : 976203609 ; 1 1 ,_.. A976200608 i 1 I t. ' 976200606 r e i 11 MAZ granded by Jeibrun Carty Cora-4 Scnices GIS !) I I? ! . .. MA10 UJ/ LLD a!ra.- -76 cbC0124A4)%4 NY \-\D-) EDE ° V1 P2.01,4■k NIES'er--e4124.0•3 COUM.ty tU6-6c.tirC I I-- OCT 9 'il.{);J ..- JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFraine.htrn 9/22/2009 vgvi. c ( ( T 'it ti= , Date � Additional Information Routing Sheet ,L .� 9..5'EtI TG1 0 REQUIRED-check at least one item in section#1 and#2 #1 This is being submitted for the following reason #2 Submitted for the following Application/s or Case #of Copies Redesign/Revision Septic Case(SEP) 3 Technical Assistance (1 copy) Building permit(BLD) 7* Record Drawing/asbuilt (1 copy) y SPAAD -_u.-()VISA,c_51.-_, 4* Monitoring Inspection Site Plan (1 copy) Subdivision (includes BLA) 7* Renewal Other-state case type 7* Other(provide detail) *If Submittal is larger than 11" X 17" submit 4 copies of those sheets • Requested by JC Staff ` OI1✓l- 1-412-051' b4OC1 _ .i Submitted by: 5. n4Cv7 /11,1 Phc C c— 1 V ° h i l y.' Check included? $* �.. ! Regarding: Parcel Number 91 ' ZC-C) ICS b I OCT 2 0 2014 1 Address Z"3SCS 1✓nv=1-1212-+tic $�CJy�q iI I J Case Number SEP , Case Number LD L ----._._.__J 1CON COUNTY Other Case Number/s —8'V N t- --N04{1p PITT OF COM':,)iNITY DP/RI nPl\nF^IT Comment: O N. ✓ o x A nN " _ _...,...._ .........i o CD EAST ARROWSTONE ROAD c303 �c v > m o co CD FF 3 N m WEST PROPER LINE - i+ to ro / , 0 - ?, ► Y4 4 4\ ' k 4 \ s/p __@ Di ♦ a P el.i� "tea •P : :; � ' > > -- � mom` a °.a � � c 4�r W N y 13 464A wi al a \it4,41 CD 0 „iiik no a ►4 92 c Ntill ; z m HT % 0(a .. 01 a 0. a cn 4 ,„°IJi1 m d ' ° O f 3 d y a y ay m 5 3 ° c f °m 0 m am y m m mD . m 4. CD< o� ° 2 ° m - a _o a3 + m,z c m 5-10.=-13 0 O c a_ c 0 pWj fan n.7•DFl m 7 o —° 7 Vl ° 7 *{ m (D ." o m j= m 2F-') <000. 1 ;5) - g--) 08 = ='.Fz' O C y � Nm ?° w �m �' ' 3n* cu�' m z0 0)ad m ow -o m5 ?°sac •7�NOy � . oSc3� �a St Z m o � A < m B`�'D O C n CD Q m O tD Z m N O ° o m3 ' nwDmi ? �m_ y * am m a 3m m 0 9 0 E m 3 (*D .0 7'0 7 n N 22.< •m N . m O x vc- n c• 3 2• n n 3 �c yr 5 m m g ?�. �8 :� m 0 0 R.35.3 cn Ilihi. 0 cp co fUU. E(O m mva3a. Fr," fD ,.;m N <N W 7 ° O. 00'7 C3 Gq - =Q• *y x a ° Oo 0 C /J<I _r 8 l O o o rri 01 0 O G goes N o 151 r-rif p 5 H ICT CD o n Q UI CO It ^' W = m CD G rn c � �o ° -�• w n m o o • a w o I O �� � 03 � w I(III�I1 m co 3 m O c. d N U y o m n O y3 m Q mp� do1 0. ACCaaDy � m " �lo Oo p . a, O p 0 m n c • m 0 Z O 5 m 3 cD r\) v o m W � � � � Z W OO DO O O O COO O O O O O o `0 C p D1 n1 r'1 C C 01 r'1 01 01 r'1 r'1 r v Z � C Z Z NNZ Z Z Z Z ' H � C ~ Z ~O r1 ____=. 1 r'1 ' ' i n � � D ,1 Q in " n1 n1 U V1 Ul :N 1211 k O u) n1 O C CO � O o� � Da Fr= Q AC O Z O O ~ 'y rn n C �9 Z m C ). (A r r r r'1 co O Th� O� EAST MARROWSTONE- ROAD — ---- �� — — 0_ 100_ -0-3 T O� — O U Q Rl / I n ?9 N05°40 33'E. I o to 0 1 100.41 ' r ®K ® O �o 1 }— 4---- I I z U Z Z / i ,00 '1 Co 1 I / I o 1 �� O —i CO 10, 4 ~ rn // N ( z O Z„ ,_,, (_,1 / 0 .„,_ . :: 1 cs _0:..11.0, [rj 1 ,, co zc ._ 7 ,,, l. O_ (0_, 011 emi p �j Cr) rrlu 0-1 rn El- )grl \ V)73-1 u-I II 'cI d o o W zD � � \ I r'S co O p 01 V) r1 N __ O O DI Co � I 1O p N 0 Z L OD Z o = r---,s 2a° N 7 2 � C)- T 0) T N ro O � No ti N. ti ti N) N) \! o v N. cn c v o m y n --- --- 1 O ik z <vz �-:!,.� n? NrmIgo c°0c 0j �' om A cN N773 Fri - v 206 ,a z . � C ` z C� Cp DC /• I\) l H .--4 ` 1 1 rrl O _ -9/ ______________ < 31 .i, � , _ti oo O O __„ ,„ 4, , _____..,....._ca NI An1 01 -11 n1 r \ � � o Fri 4��AD Ty V P z 111 n m x a r____ DETE,4'A NEB TyC/Rik”- ND\T\ CD E ° msm n 2 cN Z ril SURVEY o o m_r C:(,. .____:= I Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:06 PM To: 'Jan Caring' Cc: Elaine Rosencrants; dennyjustis @olypen.com; Susan Porto; 'Suzanne Martin' Subject: RE: 2530 E Marrowstone.. Hi Jan: I am done with my review, but Jefferson County Environmental Health (EH) needs to sign off before it can be issued. I am coordinating with Susan Porto, but she needs the following items (requested last April to be submitted)to complete her portion of the review. I have attached what she needs below(from her earlier emails) and have copied Suzanne Martin,the septic designer: Suzanne, per our discussion today regarding the above referenced project: I received a signed and stamped statement from you on 3/27/14 (copy enclosed). Unfortunately,the statement in that document did not completely address the issues I requested. Below is a copy of what was requested. I have added red to the portions not addressed. Please review the site and resubmit a signed and stamped statement that addresses all of the items of concern. If the site plan submitted in 2009 and approved is not accurate,we may need to null and void the approval until the site plan deficiencies are corrected. Terry, per our conversation just now, below are my comments on the project as referenced above. The following items were noted in review of the site and application and must be addressed prior to further review: EH will need the site plan submitted by Clark Land Office, reviewed by a licensed septic designer or engineer who will then provide a stamped and signed document stating: 1. The site plan was reviewed (date stamped received by DCD on 10/9/13, provided to me on March 18t"2014) 2.Attests to it's accuracy regarding the area for the primary and reserve,the test hole locations,the well locations/radiuses and that the septic area has not been disturbed. NOTE:the well location and radius shown on the northerly adjoining parcel is not consistent with site plan approved under ZON09-135. 3. Verifies that the septic area is appropriate under current code for approval of a new SPAAD. Once this is submitted to DCD and reviewed by EH, I can issue the permit. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner From:Jan Caring [mailto:jangaring @windermere.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:14 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Elaine Rosencrants; dennyjustis @olypen.com Subject: 2530 E Marrowstone.. Importance: High Hi Donna, 1 We're checking in to see when to expect the SPAAD permit. The buyers needs to take a look at it and approve it prior to close which is quickly coming upon us. Please let us know. Thank you, Jan Jan Garing Owner/Broker Windermere Real Estate Port Townsend Cell: 360-301-5492 Office: 360-385-9344#24 Fax: 360-385-9345 janaarinq(a)_windermere.com 2 Donna Frostholm From: Jan Garing <jangaring @windermere.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 3:52 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Fw: Habitat Management Plan for Elaine Rosencrants Attachments: Rosencrants HMP 092514.pdf Jan Garing Owner/Broker Windermere Real Estate Port Townsend Cell: 360-301-5492 Office: 360-385-9344#24 Fax: 360-385-9345 jangarindawindermere.com From: MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,September 25, 2014 3:21 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Elaine Rosencrants;Jan Garing; dennyjustis @olypen.com Subject: Habitat Management Plan for Elaine Rosencrants Hello Donna, We are submitting the attached Habitat Management Plan for 2530 E Marrowstone Road (Parcel 976 200 106). Please let us know if you would like a hard copy of this report delivered to your office or if you have any questions or comments. Thank you, Maureen &Amy Marine Surveys ft Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurvevsandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 1 Y it it k B t , r ° u r y a* ',4 by: p E t y � MARINE SU & S 521 Snagstead RVEYS A Way SESSMENTS Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 385-4073 marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com Table of Contents I.PROJECT INFORMATION 3 A.Project Location: 3 B.Project Description. 3 C.Action Area: 4 II.HABITAT AND SPECIES INFORMATION 4 A.Habitat description 4 B. Species description 5 III.EFFECT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 8 A.Direct Effects: 8 B. Indirect Effects: 8 C. Impact Summary 9 IV. CONSERVATION MEASURES TO AVOID AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS 9 A. FWHCA Buffer 9 B. Siltation Mitigation: 10 C. Shoreline Conservation: 10 V.DETERMINATION OF EFFECT: 11 References 12 Plant List for 2530 E Marrowstone Road Site Visit 22 Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 1 Figures Figure 1.Project Location 14 Figure 2. Site Plan and Habitat Survey with buffer, set back, and building envelope 15 Figure 3. Surveyed parcel with set-backs and building envelope 16 Figure 4. Looking towards the south property line along the bluff,with stake marking property boundary. 17 Figure 5.Looking northeast,past partially downed willow 17 Figure 6. Looking east over the shoreline set-back, with 2 dead cedars (center) and partially dead cedar (right)along the southern property line at the bluffs edge. 18 Figure 7.An area of the set-back appears to be previously cleared of trees 18 Figure 8.Partially downed willow east of building envelope,within the protected shoreline set-back19 Figure 9.Typical native species shrubbery at the site. 19 Figure 10.Typical native shrubbery at the site(ferns,salal). 20 Figure 11.Typical groundcover at the site. 20 Figure 12.Looking north at neighbor's house 21 Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 2 ROSENCRANTS HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN The proponents are proposing to sell property with a Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)to develop the property within a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area(FWHCA)buffer. A Habitat Management Plan (HMP) following the standards of Jefferson County Code(JCC):18.22.440 is required in accordance with JCC:18.22.265 because the proposed project will alter and decrease the standard FWHCA buffer.The proposed building envelope is not expected to adversely affect the habitat function and value of the adjacent FWHCA,to reduce the buffer greater than 75%of the standard FWHCA buffer,or impinge on the shoreline bluff set back. Additionally a mitigation plan following the standards of JCC:18.22.350 is included in this HMP in order to minimize and compensate for any potential impact to the buffer attributed to the proposed project. In consideration of the information included herein, approval of a FWHCA buffer reduction is requested in accordance with JCC:18.22.270. I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Location: Section 33, Township 30 North,Range 01 East. Jefferson County Washington Parcel 976 200 106 2530 E Marrowstone Road,Nordland, WA 98365 Latitude 48° 3'7.44"N Longitude 122°41'5.21"W According to the most recent survey (October 2013, Figure 3), the parcel 976200106 is approximately 0.66 acres (28,561 square feet) in size. The parcel is vacant land with no current development and is accessed via East Marrowstone Road which borders it on the West.Developed residential parcels border the property to the North and South, while the shoreline along the Admiralty Inlet of Puget Sound borders the property to the East. The east property boundary runs along a 70'high bluff.The project location is seen in Figure 1 and a detailed site plans are provided in Figures 2 and 3. B. Project Description: Property dimensions are slightly irregular:North border 275.29', South border 275.89' (plus a 20' set-back from the road on the North and South borders),West border 110.41',East border 101.99'. See parcel survey for all property dimensions in Figure 3. The proposed building envelope will include removing trees and will impinge upon the FWHCA buffer, but will not impact the 72.7' shoreline set-back from the bluff The required FWHCA buffer (150' landward of OHWM as described in JCC:18.22.270) and the building set back from buffer of 5' cannot be met on this proposed project. The proposed building envelope begins approximately 124'-133' west of the OHWM(Figure 3). This is an impingement of the FWHCA buffer and building setback by 22'-31', totaling a 16% reduction in the required buffer/setback (Table 1). Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 3 Table 1.Area(square feet)of proposed reduction to FWHCA buffer and additional building set-back Buffer(square feet) , Total Impacted Preserved FWHCA buffer 15,435 2,126 13,309 5'building set-back 518 467 51 Given the current state of the habitat on this site (see Section II below), future development and management of the property can incorporate conservation and mitigation to avoid and minimize and compensate for potential impacts, while protecting and enhancing the habitat functions and values of the adjacent FWHCA,thus meeting the intent of the JCC:18.22.270. C.Action Area: The action area includes the entire property; the area being evaluated for potential direct and indirect impacts is the portion of the property extending 18'-26' into the FWHCA buffer. II. HABITAT AND SPECIES INFORMATION A. Habitat description As stated above,this site is vacant land that is currently undeveloped. The property has a steep eastern bluff bordering Admiralty Inlet;the top of the bluff is 68-70' above OHWM, and the bluff base begins approximately 51'-60' west of the OHWM. This property is forested with a well-developed understory consisting of native vegetation(Figures 4-12),with some evidence of previous clearing(Figure 7).A habitat survey at the site conducted August 27, 2014, confirmed that trees at the site consist of large Western Red Cedars (Thuja plicata),Red Alder(Alnus rubra), one Hooker Willow(Salix hookeriana) and one Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), with an understory primarily consisting of Western Sword Ferns (Polystichum munitum), Salal (Gaultheria shallon), Baldhip Rose(Rosa gymnocarpa),Trailing Blackberry(Rubus ursinus), and Common Velvet Grass(Holcus lanatus). Invasive and/or non-native plant species were not identified at the site. Priority Habitats identified at the site include Aquatic habitat, Cliffs/bluffs and Big brown bat Communal Roost Area (WDFW 2011). No salmon streams occur near the action area (WDFW 2014). Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 4 B. Species description Priority species located within the vicinity of Admiralty Inlet and the action area includes: • Sand lance spawning and hardshell clam habitat- 350 meters north(ERMA 2014); • Marine Critical Habitat for Hood Canal Summer-run chum salmon(NMFS 2005); • Marine Critical Habitat for Puget Sound chinook salmon(NMFS 2005); • Proposed Nearshore Rockfish Critical Habitat(NMFS 2013). Given that the proposed construction will be located 124'-133' landward of the OHMW and on a bluff that is 70' above sea level, it is highly unlikely that the marine species and habitats listed above will be affected by construction activities.Big brown bat(Eptesicus fuscus)communal roost habitat occurs at the site,but is not a protected species and is common and increasing in abundance (Hayes 2013). The Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) is listed under the Endangered Species Act as a threatened species according to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (Federal Register/Vol. 64,No. 56/March 24, 1999/Rules and Regulations). On May 11, 2007, NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)as a threatened species under the ESA(Federal Register/Vol. 72,No. 91 /Friday, May 11, 2007/Rules and Regulations). On September 2, 2005, NMFS issued the final rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant Units(ESUs) of West Coast salmon, including the Puget Sound chinook salmon ESU and the Hood Canal summer-run Chum ESU. The project site is in an area designated as critical habitat for the Puget Sound Chinook ESU and Hood Canal summer-run chum (Federal Register/ Vol 70,No.170/Friday, September 2,2005 /Rules and Regulations). Bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus)were listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) in October of 1999. The project site is not located on a shoreline designated as critical habitat for Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout(Federal Register/Vol.70,No. 185/September 26, 2005 /Rules and Regulations). On April 27,2010,NOAA listed the distinct population segments(DPSs)of yelloweye and canary rockfish as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and listed the Georgia Basin DPS of bocaccio as endangered(Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 81 /April 28, 2010/Final Rule). The Georgia Basin refers to all of Puget Sound, including the area around the San Juan Islands, and the Strait of Georgia north to the mouth of the Campbell River in British Columbia. The western boundary of the Georgia Basin runs from east of Port Angeles to Victoria in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. On November 15, 2005 NMFS listed the Southern Resident killer whale (Orcinus orca) as endangered under ESA (Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 /November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations).NOAA Fisheries has designated critical habitat for killer whales (Federal Register/ Vol. 71, No. 229/November 29, 2006 /Final Rule). Critical habitat includes waters deeper than 20'relative to a contiguous shoreline delimited by the line of extreme high water.The project site is not located in the critical habitat for the Southern Resident killer whale. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 5 NMFS also listed both the humpback whale(Megaptera novaeangliae)and the Pacific leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) as endangered species that may occur in Puget Sound. Marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) have also been listed as threatened by the USFWS since 1992. No marbled murrelet critical habitat is designated near the project site(USFWS 2014).There is no designated critical habitat for leatherback sea turtles in Washington and no designated critical habitat for humpback whales at this time. 1.Puget Sound Chinook:Puget Sound chinook,also called the king salmon,are distinguished from all other Pacific salmon by their large size.Most chinook in the Puget Sound are"ocean-type" and migrate to the marine environment during their first year (Myers et al. 1998). They may enter estuaries immediately after emergence as fry from March to May at a length of 40 mm, or they may enter the estuaries as fingerling smolts during May and June of their first year at a length of 60-80 mm. (Healey 1982). Chinook fry in Washington estuaries feed on emergent insects and epibenthic crustaceans (gammarid amphipods, mysids, and cumaceans). As they grow and move into neritic habitats,they feed on decapod larvae, larval and juvenile fish,drift insects, and euphausiids (Simenstad et al. 1982). These ocean-type chinook use estuaries as rearing areas and are the most dependent of all salmon species on estuaries for survival. According to WDFW,no Puget Sound Chinook Salmon occurrences are present near the action area, although Admiralty Inlet is a migratory corridor (WDFW 2011). No effects on Puget Sound Chinook Salmon are expected as the project site is located well above the OHMW and away from critical habitat. 2.Bull Trout: Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout have ranged geographically from northern California (at present they are extinct in California) to the Bering Sea coast of Alaska, and northwest along the Pacific Rim to northern Japan and Korea.Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family. Spawning occurs typically from August to November in streams and migration to the open sea (for anadromous populations) takes place in the spring. Eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival.Temperatures in excess of about 15 degrees C are thought to limit bull trout distribution (Rieman and McIntyre 1993). They live both in fresh and marine waters. Some migrate to larger rivers(fluvial), lakes(adfluvial), or saltwater (anadromous) before returning to smaller streams to spawn. Others (resident bull trout) complete all of their life in the streams where they were reared.Habitat degradation,dams and diversions,and predation by non-native fish threaten the Coastal-Puget Sound population.The Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout population is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the contiguous United States (Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 210 / 1999). According to WDFW, no Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout occurrences are present near Admiralty Inlet or the action area(WDFW 2011).No effects on Bull Trout are expected as the project site is located well above the OHMW and away from critical habitat. 3.Puget Sound Steelhead: Steelhead is the name given to the anadromous form of the species O. mykiss. The freshwater residents are called Rainbow trout. Steelhead can return to the ocean after spawning and migrate to freshwater to spawn again,unlike Pacific salmon. Steelhead fry can spend one to two years in freshwater before heading to the open ocean, where they may stay for two to four years before returning to Washington streams). According to WDFW, no Puget Sound Steelhead occurrences are present near Admiralty Inlet or the action area(WDFW Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 6 2011). No effects on Puget Sound Steelhead are expected as the project site is located well above the OHMW and away from critical habitat. 4.Rockfish: Bocaccio rockfish are found more often in South Puget Sound,whereas yelloweye are more prevalent in North Puget Sound.All three species of rockfish remain close to the surface as larvae and pelagic juveniles.As juveniles they settle to benthic environment.They prefer to settle in rocky reefs, kelp beds, low rock and cobble areas (Love et al. 2002). Yelloweye juveniles are also found in sponge gardens. As the three species grow larger they move into deeper waters. Adults are found around rocky reefs and coarse habitats. Yelloweye rockfish are commonly found at depths from 300' to 590'. Canary rockfish usually habitat the area between 160'to 820' and bocaccio rockfish are usually found between 160' and 820' (Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 /Rules and Regulations.). All three species are opportunistic feeders,with their prey dependent on their life stage.Predators of the adults of these species include marine mammals, salmon, other rockfish, lingcod and sharks. No effects on juvenile rockfish are expected as the project site is located well above the OHMW and away from any rockfish habitat. 5.Marbled Murrelets: Marbled murrelets are small marine birds in the alcidae family.They spend most of their time at sea and only use old growth areas for nesting.In the critical nesting areas, fragmentation and loss of old growth forest has a significant impact on the survival and conservation of the species (WDW 1993). Adult birds are found within or adjacent to the marine environment where they dive for sand lance,sea perch,Pacific herring,surf smelt,other small schooling fish and invertebrates. There is no critical habitat within close range of the project and there are no nests close to the project site(USFWS 2014). 6.Forage Fish:Migrating salmon utilize baitfish such as Pacific herring(Clupea harengus pallasi), sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) and surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus) as prey resources. These forage fish form a very important trophic link between plankton resources and a wide variety of predatory marine organisms as well as providing food for marbled murrelets and bald eagles.Due to the location of the project site being well above the OHMW,no forage fish or forage fish habitat is expected to be impacted. 7.Humpback Whales: Due to excessive whaling practices in the past, humpback whales are rarely seen in Puget Sound, even though in the past they were much more prevalent (Angell and Balcomb 1982). According to Osborne et al. (1988), there were only three sightings of humpback whales in Puget Sound from 1976 to 1988. However, more recently, a juvenile humpback whale was sighted near Johnson Point(NE of Olympia),with several fresh injuries (Orca Network Sighting Report-July 10,2006). Another sighting was made in Dalco Passage between Gig Harbor and Pt.Defiance on June 23, 2011 (Orca Network Sighting Report). Due to the location of the project site being well above the OHMW, no Humpback Whales are expected to be impacted. 8. Leatherback Sea Turtle: There is no breeding habitat for these sea turtles in Washington, even though they are occasionally seen along the coast (Bowlby et al. 1994). They are rarely seen in Puget Sound (McAllister, pers. comm.). Due to the location of the project site being well above the OHMW,no Leatherback Sea Turtles are expected to be impacted. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 7 9.Southern Resident Killer Whales:The Southern Resident population consists of three pods: J,K and L. According to Wiles (2004), "While in inland waters during warmer months, all of the pods concentrate their activity in Haro Strait, Boundary Passage, the Southern Gulf Islands, the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and several localities in the southern Georgia Strait."During early autumn,these pods, especially J pod, extend their movements into Puget Sound to take advantage of the chum and chinook salmon runs. Resident killer whales spend more time in deeper water and only occasionally enter water less than 5 meters deep (Baird 2001). Similar to the Humpback Whales,due to the location of the project site being well above the OHMW,no Killer Whales are expected to be impacted. III. EFFECT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A. Direct Effects: The potential direct impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat caused by the construction process are as follows. 1. Decreased number of native plants.As described in Section II A,the location of the proposed development is vegetated with native plants and trees. The greatest impact of this project will be the removal of native plants and trees in the footprint of the proposed development envelope. Information on proposed avoidance and minimization measures can be found in Section IV, and long-term maintenance of the site is discussed in Section VI. B. Indirect Effects: The potential indirect impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat caused by the construction process are as follows. 1. Siltation into the shoreline areas. Siltation has the potential to bury forage fish eggs(although no forage fish is known to be present adjacent to the property based on WDFW PHS maps). In the case of this project, it is unlikely that any siltation above and beyond normal erosion will occur to the beach below due to the vegetation present in the shoreline set-back and the existing bluff. 2. FWHCA Buffer. The reduction of a FWHCA buffer can have indirect and/or direct effects on the species that utilize the FWHCA. However, the proposed building envelope represents a 16% reduction in the 150' FWHCA buffer and additional 5' building set back, with the majority of the FWHCA buffer remaining intact and functional. Because the proposed development will be located 124'-132' landward of the OHMW and set back from a bluff that is 70' above OHWM, the indirect and direct effects on protected species (all marine) utilizing the FWHCA are expected to be negligible in this project. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 8 C. Impact Summary The overall potential impacts of the proposed development on the adjacent FWHCA and its buffers are expected to be minimal given the proper precautions are taken as described below.The Mitigation and Conservation measures described below have been developed with the goal of protecting the ecological function and habitat value of the FWHCA buffer. IV. CONSERVATION MEASURES TO AVOID AND MINIMIZE IMPACTS A. FWHCA Buffer: This shoreline environment is part of a fish and wildlife habitat critical area. The FWHCA buffer provides a variety of functions and values including shoreline protection (erosion control), habitat formation, pollution filtration, moderating water temperature, providing habitat for terrestrial animals and insects, and providing proper nutrient, leaf litter, and invertebrate prey sources for aquatic life.The remaining portion of the FWHCA buffer includes the 72.7' shoreline bluff set-back; this area will be preserved and protected with the following measures. a. Prior to construction, orange safety fence will be erected along the building set-back (72.7' feet from the bluff)to prevent any potential disturbance or temporary impacts to the protected area. Before any construction begins, Jefferson County Department of Community Development(DCD)must be contacted and given the opportunity to come to the site to verify that the safety fencing is in place and protective of the bluff set-back. b. The 72.7' bluff set-back will be preserved.There will be no cutting or trimming of native plants or trees, no improvements(including no access improvements to the existing foot path to the bluff), no future development, no new view corridors. DCD must be consulted before any cutting,trimming, or removals are considered. The area will be monitored for invasive or non-native plant species found colonizing the site; they will be removed on a regular basis (without prior consultation with DCD). c. To ensure long term sustainability and ecological function of the property's FWHCA buffer,seasonal and/or periodic removal of invasive plants will be done to maintain the existing native vegetation. The governing agency will be sent photographs upon request, of the long-term condition of the FWHCA buffer. d. No pesticides or herbicides will be used within the original FWHCA buffer, including the building envelope reduction area. e. In the FWHCA reduction area where development is proposed, a 5' wide area of native vegetation will remain undisturbed along the north and south property boundaries. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 9 B. Siltation Mitigation: Several methods are suggested to prevent siltation. On December 13,2002 (with a technical correction on December 20), Jefferson County adopted the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology in August 2001 and updated in August 2012, as the set of stormwater management standards for all new development and redevelopment in Jefferson County(WSDE 2012). The following precautions for siltation prevention during construction processes are suggested in Volume II "Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention" in the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. These Best Management Practices(BMPs) are as follows: • BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation • BMP C 102: Buffer Zones • BMP C103: High Visibility Fence • BMP C105: Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit • BMP C106: Wheel Wash • BMP C 107: Construction Road/Parking Area Stabilization • BMP C 120: Temporary and Permanent Seeding • BMP C121: Mulching • BMP C 122:Nets and Blankets • BMP C 123: Plastic Covering • BMP C124: Sodding • BMP C 125: Topsoiling/Composting • BMP C 126: Polyacrylamide(PAM) for Soil Erosion Protection • BMP C 130: Surface Roughening • BMP C131: Gradient Terraces • BMP C140: Dust Control • BMP C150: Materials on Hand • BMP C151: Concrete Handling • BMP C152: Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution Prevention • BMP C153: Material Delivery, Storage and Containment • BMP C154: Concrete Washout Area • BMP C160: Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead • BMP C162: Scheduling Please refer to Volume II "Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention" in the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington for BMP details. C. Shoreline Conservation: Conservation of the shoreline will include regular removal of debris(of human origin)on the beach. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 10 V. DETERMINATION OF EFFECT: After reviewing the appropriate data and surveys,the determination of effect is: 1.Puget Sound chinook-"No effect" 2. Bull trout,-"No effect" 3.Puget Sound steelhead -"No effect" 4.Bocaccio,yelloweye and canary rockfish - "No effect" 5.Marbled murrelet- "No effect" 6.Humpback whale-"No effect" 7.Leatherback sea turtle-"No effect" 8. Southern Resident killer whale-"No effect" Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 11 REFERENCES Angell, T. and K. C. Balcomb III. 1982.Marine Birds and Mammals of Puget Sound.Puget Sound Books. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 146 pp. Bowlby,D. E., G.A. Green and M. L. Bonnell. 1994. Observations of leatherback turtles offshore of Washington and Oregon.Northwestern Naturalist 75:33-35. Federal Register/Vol. 61,No. 102/May 24, 1996/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 64,No. 56/March 24, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 64,No. 210/November 1, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol 70,No.170/Friday, September 2, 2005 /Rules and Regulations. Federal Register, Vol. 70,No. 222/November 18, 2005 /Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 71,No.229/November 29, 2006/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 72,No. 91 /Friday,May 11, 2007/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 81 /Wednesday,April 28, 2010/Rules and Regulations. Hayes, G. and G. J. Wiles. 2013. Washington Bat Conservation Plan. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. 138+viii pp. Healey, M. C. 1982. Juvenile Pacific salmon in estuaries: the life support system,pp. 315 -341. In: V.S. Kennedy(ed.),Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. Hinman, C. 2007.Rain Garden Handbook for Western Washington Homeowners. Washington State University Extension Pierce County,Tacom, WA, 45pp. http://county.wsu.edu/mason/nrs/water/Documents/Raingarden_handbook.pdf Hruby, T., 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington—Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication#04-06-025. Jeffries, Steven J., Patrick J. Gearin,Harriet R.Huber, Don L. Saul and Darrell A. Pruett. 2000. Atlas of Seal and Sea Lion Haulout Sites in Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Science Division, Olympia, WA, 150 pp. Love, M.S., M.M. Yoklavich, and L.Thorsteinson. 2002.The rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. University of California Press,Berkeley, California. Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 12 Myers, J. M., R. G.Kope, G. J.Bryant, D. Teel, L. J.Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grand,F. W. Waknitz,K.Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California.U.S. Dept. of Commerce,NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS-NWFSC- 35, 443 pp. Osborne,R., J. Calambokidis and E. M.Dorsey. 1988.A guide to marine mammals of greater Puget Sound. Island Publishers,Anacortes, WA, 191 pp. Pierce County Stormwater Management and Site Development Manual. 2008.Vol. 2 "Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention" Rieman, B.E. and J. D.McIntyre. 1993. Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of Bull Trout.Gen. Tech. Rpt. U. S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 38 pp. Simenstad,C.A.,K.L.Fresh and E.O. Salo. 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function,pp. 343- 364. In V.S. Kennedy(ed.).Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 2014. Critical Habitat Mapper (http://ecos.fws.gov/crithab/flex/crithabMapper.jsp). September 10, 2014 Washington State Conservation Commission. Salmonid Habitat Limiting Factors Analysis. Water Resources Inventory Area 12, Chambers-Clover Creek Watershed. June 2003. Washington State Conservation Commission. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors. Water Resources Inventory Area 15, East Kitsap Watershed.November 2000. Washington Department of Wildlife(WDW). 1993. Status of the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus in Washington. Unpubl.Rep. Wash.Dept. Wildl., Olympia, WA. WDFW(Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2011.Priority Habitats and Species report for Admiralty Inlet.Available at:http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/. Olympia, Washington. WDFW(Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2014. Salmonscape (http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/) September 10, 2014. Wiles, G.J. 2004. Washington State status report for the killer whale. Washington Department Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 106 pp. WSDE (Washington State Department of Ecology). 2012. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program. Olympia, WA. 1035 pp. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/manual.html Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 13 Figure 1.Project Location 2530 E hvlarroa:,stone Drr,e � \ flap date 09 02 14 c q _ - . / '1\ „t ',..,,, , - 1f\ «_ i a` M r t - E 7, 1 _ v X 4 ,1F F \ \ Y \�� t I l� �'. I .�y� 1. yr a \ x ' ,ti p S. - -.....- .. .....,\ Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 14 Figure 2.Site Plan and Habitat Survey with buffer,set back,and building envelope 2530 E Marrow stone Drr,e Fiordland'J"'r. Map date 09.02'13 10 ,�5O� Parcel*976200105 a) 0 0 Mnl 3 S- O H L11 / c Legend a v i Site Boundaries —OHWM / / �, _—Bluff etlge a10' 220 ato lea 100• tad' RO ,ea' el' ee. 41. 2t —72.T slope setback ....—150'FWHCA buffer —150'FWHCA buffer,5 building set-back ®Proposed building erwelope 5 building set-back 150'FWHCA buffer Habitat Survey(5127114) Parcel*970200102 • Cherry • Alder • Dead • Dead Cedar • Partially dead Cedar N • Fir A Partially dead willow -:: n.s ee. 10 Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 15 Figure 3.Surveyed parcel with set-backs and building envelope . 0 , e e i3 X ......, • , c;., • ,-, , n v.(..,c- Cl ..:1 c c•-■ c, ,,.,,, -* ., -Jum.......—Cq.110111111.p..)■ C.'• (.1 n r■-, ',3 I, r., r,-:,..:;)I' c..1 41 '.-..), -.9 ,i c. ',-,,-, c • c , c- : -,.` :, - r*, ',".. , e• a R ' c.: '...■A ";.- :-.) ,... a 0 :... n e. EAST MARROW--------------rolv4_ A.. ,..., - -- -oAD r...:,' ,0,2 z - — ,...e.„... 1 1 rn (4 C) , , CO' 0 • --- -__ ■ --, ).'i -a "... ._ ,'..' :---. • 0 r'l -■`-') ,..., -,-, `---. :.,„..." -,'' . rrl C.. , C.: \''' ' % ' ,' I, C) Cr Z 1 S S ,...: At. ,,,---. ■-......, : , 'S' , • ' ., 'a ','\ \, • c), . -.0 ,,. • . ) 'J 7,1--z tv ........,,, \ -r t ,:.. 14 "Th-4 -t RI. c•il+ , Z S ', -,1 !-,- 7 to 'N1 '',:,". -4 - 03 , ' C-. ,S s.. (-1 , :: 4 <- ) ,::, _, \---,-'s,,,,,,\-:-,,:: . ----,e,)- g, . T , 77-k, ,...: , 1 , ".., s/i / 1 I 1 i 4N,f; Ns , ... , , ., ,.., .:I— 1 I u' cs , 1 ,--■— 1,0114 1 i V 1 '')1. I '4-11 -:, •-, 7 ---- SAI 4. Ati,-,,,.0_ _ -- i ..g .-, .. . • ,... 6 1- _ 1 §,1 J i / 1 ---- , 4, ?: '11■11L R - - _ N -)-----.4 __.-4.),, -x_ NA_ , , a 0, ,4°41/1?-41.4 ry ":1 MN •-■2.. .,r*.■ /11,14E 4-,44,,,RD _ De7E-P4,f,v,.7.,"IDARirs „En 0) 7fre5 iii Aior I -,.■ Marine Surveys&Assessments Rosencrants Property:Habitat Management Plan• Page 16 STAGE Po ,66A 7/64/ CERTIFIED MAIL. ) s 14riEs , CI;1,f& . ',q- (I.O35 111 1111 MI 1 , DE's"f4 (Oar myils,ip 11111111111 ,... „.c.17 111111111111 -- 03 5 acr 1.45, 14 AMOUNT 1000 $6,43 7014 0510 0002 1894 5890 98368 00061916-06 FT--------- ; ,. CEOVEI &yykyvvklaN( SEP 1 2 2014 ' I ' ' ! il=.-FFERSON COUNTY , COMMUNITY DEVEL v OPMENT 150s \- 4) \Ai INS i Peatu IkAto 4,.'J 4,---poo_ q 3 tio g 993E:824392 i isiiiiiiiiilibitpuiplipiapinfrihiohrin iiinsind 3NI1 031100 IV 010A'ssuaav Nuniati HI ao IHOI HI 01 3d013AN3 AO d01 IV 3N3113 30Yld ........... _ • .vw Al DOTTED LINE PD (36X CERTIFIED MAIL,. . I I U.S. PSTAGE %" DES MO NS.IA I II 11 II 0111 111111 '11‘'i 50375 ek, 1 UNITED STATES AUG 27,'19 (� T EDSTATFS AMOUNT Il IIII I I 7014 0510 0002 1890 3449 ion OCb 70 FORE , .,, 98368 00023797-t2 U a .4# �5r �\ DBank Swallow On0. a F-os-i-A01 ,r► V.,e t- C 0 vy, rn u v.i Vey eh P m eve-/-- RETUiE 6a I - ckericar S-f teet�- RE ' P r+- 1-6 " sand \kfr 6( Y3o� 1 Ami 1119103H/.01 3d073 AN3 dO dOl 1V H3N�I1', I I Certified Fiber Sourcing www.sfiprogram.org THIS ENVELOPE IS RECYCLABLE AND MADE WITH 30%POST CONSUMER CONTENT ©LISPS 2012 586180 PGS : 4 COV 09/12/2014 03:02 PM $75.00 JODI Jefferson County WA Auditor's Office - Donna Eldridge, Auditor 1 rjriigik 1011:1010 U'611iYrrh II II AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantor: Elaine Rosencrants Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this eday of Sep1- fol4, by Grantor(s) Elaine Rosencrants whose mailing address is P.O. Box 71661, Clive, IA 50325 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall constitute a burden upon, touch upon and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described real property located Nordland BLK 1 S100' of N390' E of Co Rd, as per plat recorded in Volume 2, Page 110, records of Jefferson County, Washington; at 2530 E Marrowstone Road. Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 976200106 Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement, shall receive a site plan approval advance determination (SPAAD) permit, per the Jefferson County Code including, but not limited to, JCC Titles 15 and 18, to allow for the future construction of a single family residence on a parcel that contains a Critical Area, specifically construction of a Single-family Residence within a mapped Geologically Hazardous Area and known slide area, as defined by Chapter 18.22 Jefferson County Code. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A PERMIT OF ANY TYPE In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the construction of the items described and listed below within a Critical Area, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire to obtain a SPAAD for future construction of a single family residence on the parcel. The property is situated in a Geologically Hazardous Area and known slide area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in development in a Geologically Hazardous Area and known slide area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors' proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees) that may at any time arise, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, stormwater management system approval, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation, administrative code or County Ordinance. 4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein and shall touch upon the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written above. GRA TORS Elaine Rosencrants Nat,\'' cva STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Elaine Rosencrants si ne is Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowledge it to e their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. DATED this S/41 day of -Cfai & , 20/r. Aar Print name: ,bent' atiorh 4 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of ehington, County of /U1C. , residing at 994 S,wt cketc.2' -for . My commission expires: , frgy BREITtOf8C4_ ., enkilOnExp Approved by the Jefferson County Planning Manager: MNonber Date: / f2(2lf By: _ ` � Stacie os ins, Planning Manager Approved pP as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney I . By: 000 , Date: O Jj301 17 David Alvarez, Chief Civil D f 'r •,.�.Mss+•Rfiur�-Ywwwti'.fnos.......,:x�w.rM+s.�,.....,..,,.... JEFFERSON COUNTY s =r� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT y 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.fefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning May 16, 2014 ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS PO BOX 71661 CLIVE IA 50325-0661 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2530 E MARROWSTONE RD CASE#: MLA13-00135 Dear ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. Th geotechnical reports prepared by Stratum Group will be used to determine the setback for the building envelope. Based on this, the site plan does not need to be revised. However, DCD will require that the attached Hold Harmless Agreement be filled out, signed and notarized, and recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor's Office. Based on the site plan, the building envelope is within a 150-foot-wide fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer (and 5-foot-wide building setback). Since the building envelope is within 155 feet of the ordinary high water mark of Admiralty Inlet, a habitat management plan prepared by a qualified biologist will be needed. If you have any questions, I can be contacted by phone at 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by August 14, 2014. Pursuant to Jefferson County Code, JCC 18.40.110(3)and (6), if the applicant does not submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, .2)a ma gwQ,tifelitt Department of Community Development Staff c: File TERRY MC HUGH • \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_AddInfo_Requst.rpt 5/16/2014 gonna Frostholm From: Terry McHugh [tmch @olypen.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 2:58 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Rosencrantz Attachments: 3313_001.pdf Donna, I received this letter from Dan McShane of the Stratum Group and as you can see it fairly explains the difference in the Geo-Tech reports. The main thing here is the fact that Steve Zenovic is a civil engineer and typically designs water systems and storm water plans whereas Dan McShane is actually a Geo-Tech engineer and has completed numerous Geo-T ec h reports along g that entire stretch of shoreline. Please call either Dan or me with questions. Thanks, Terry McHugh 301-1763 Original Message From: <jlspt @olypen.com> To: "Terry" <tmch @olypen.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 2:33 PM Subject: Attached Image This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com STRATUM GROUP P.O.Box 2546,Bellingham,WA 98227 Phone(360)714-9409 April 21, 2014 Elaine Rosencrants P.O. Box 71661 Clive, IA 50325 Re: Geology Hazard Assessment,Shoreline Bluff Setback Difference Parcel 9076200106 2530 East Marrowstone Road Norland, Washington Dear Ms. Rosencrants: This letter is to address the request for information from Jefferson County Community Development regarding the 50-foot setback distance I recommended in my geology hazard assessment report and the setback distance of 100 feet by Zenovic and Associates. While it understandable that the difference has led to confusion,the Zenovic report should not be considered a geology hazard assessment report as it was prepared an engineer and did not fully evaluate the geologic conditions of the site. The Stratum Group report was prepared as a geologic hazard assessment by a licensed engineering geologist. The difference in setback is based on using a different assumed erosion rate and a different approach to an additional safety setback. Stratum Group setback determination used a bluff recession rate of 4 inches per year and an additional setback of 10 feet to account for additional top of bluff failures of 10 feet.The Stratum Group set back was also established for an expected life of the structure of 100 years. Zenovic used a bluff recession rate erosion rate of 8 inches per year and instead of characterizing the types of bluff failures simply nearly doubled the setback calling it a safety factor of 2. Zenovic used a life of the structure of 75 years. Hence: Stratum Group: 0.33 feet/year x 100 years+ 10 feet = 43 feet rounded shifted to a more conservative 50 feet Zenovic: 0.67 feet/year x 75 years x 2 safety factor = 100 feet } April 21,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment Set Back Discussion Obviously the primary difference is Zenovic is used a bluff recession rate that is twice as high and utilized what he termed a safety factor that simply multiplied the result by 2 which would be a very high safety factor. In regards to erosion and bluff recession,the utilization of a bluff erosion rate of 8 inches used by Zenovic is not consistent with information regarding bluff retreat in similar settings. Krueger (1988)estimated a bluff retreat rate of 10 centimeters (3 inches)for a location on the northern tip of Marrowstone Island exposed to large fetch and very high wave energy and shoreline transport. Krueger(1988)provided no specific bluff retreat values along the shore reach of the subject property other than designating the reach as an area of relatively slow wave erosion. Shipman (http://www.snocomrc.org/uploads/Information%20 for%20C oastal%20Landowners/5%20DOE- Shore%20Eros%20and%20Impacts.pdf) indicates on less exposed shoreline reaches,"the erosion rates are often much less than 4 inches per year." My own review of historic aerial images, historic maps,as well as observation of vegetation on the bluff slope suggests a bluff retreat rate at the property and vicinity that is likely much less than 4 inches per year.This is consistent with Shipman's observation and Johannessen(personal communication).Hence, it is my professional opinion that the use of 4 inches per year(0.33 feet/year)is a conservatively high rate and the actual rate is likely significantly less. If Zenovic had used the same bluff retreat rate as I had his setback would have been 50 feet. (0.33 feet/year x 75 years x 2 safety factor = 50 feet). Jefferson Code does not set a standard life of the structure value. I use 100 years in all of my reports establishing a home setback,a more conservative value than the 75 years used by Zenovic. Using bluff retreat alone does not recognize that the scale of top of bluff failures may extend the failure deeper into the setback. I utilized a distance of 10 feet which is consistent with a conservative estimate for the size of bluff top failures observed in the vicinity and at other sites with similar geologic conditions. While it is my opinion that the setback I used is adequately conservative,Zenovic clearly used a much more conservative approach by simply multiplying his result by 2. Stratum Group File:3,3.14 2 April 21,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment Set Back Discussion It is my professional opinion as a licensed engineering geologist that the recommended set back of 50 feet from the top of the steep shoreline bluff slope will provided adequate protection for the life of the structure.Please feel free to call if further clarification is needed. Stratum Group appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions please contact our office at(360)714-9409. Sincerely yours, Stratum Group Dan McShane,M.Sc.,L.E.G. Licensed Engineering Geologist References: Shipman (http://www.snocomrc.org/uploads/Information%20for%20Coastal%20Landowners/5%20DOE- Shore%20Eros%20and%20lmpacts.pdt) Keuler(1988)http://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/1198e/plate-1.pdf Stratum Group File:3.314 3 FACT SHEET Shoreline Erosion Rates When geologists speak of coastal erosion rates, they Ralph Keuler, with the US. Geological Survey, usually mean long-term average rates of shoreline measured long-term shoreline erosion in much of north- retreat. When property owners speak of coastal ero- ern Puget Sound. The fastest rates are over 1 foot per sion rates,they usually mean the amount of bluff that year at Point Partridge on the exposed west side of slid during the previous winter. Both of these rates are Whidbey Island, but this rate is unusually high for important, and it is critical to understand the Puget Sound. Even on exposed feeder bluffs such as distinction. Forbes Point near Oak Harbor, the north end of Shoreline retreat is the rate at which the toe of the bluff Marrowstone Island,or Yellow Bluff on Guemes Island, moves landward and must be documented over a long retreat rates are in the 4-to 8-inch per year range. On enough period so as not to be influenced by short-term less exposed shorelines,the erosion rates are often much variations. Short-term erosion typically refers to slope less than 4 inches per year. failures such as landslides, slumps, or simply the Coastal erosion is highly episodic. Long periods during sloughing of a layer of soil and vegetation. In the case which erosion is negligible are interrupted by short, of slope failures,it is useful to know the frequency and impressive slumps and landslides. These slope failures the maximum extent of such an event. are triggered by saturated soils, tree blowdown, or the High rates of bluff retreat combination of storm occur when: 60- waves and high tides. t Average a oblot1 Cate / Although these events may • Wave energy is high. ectusls 2 feet/decade �. cause the top of the bank Long fetches in the c to retreat several feet, and direction of predomi- V.+ 40 Norma!Condition: • may appear even worse nant winds, coupled E unoa erosion since they strip away ma- with deep water close tore vegetation, the long- to shore, allow large o 20 .Landslide or term rate at the location waves to develop and F. erosion event may still be very slow. It to reach the toe of the -6 15 be many decades bluff. Energetic waves N / before that portion of the can break apart rocks 0 bank slides again. more easily and can 1800 1900 2000 2100 Shoreline property owners rapidly remove eroded Figure 1. Long term erosion rates are an average of many often accelerate erosion material the bluffm expos e Landslide or erosion events over a period of decades to rates by weakening the of fresh material. centuries. bluff or causing the beach to diminish. The former is easily done by clearing up- * Bluff materials are weak Many factors affect the land vegetation and changing bluff hydrology by mis- resistance of rock to erosion, including rock type, directing storm runoff or placing sewage drain fields too fractures,and groundwater saturation. The glacial close to the bluff. . sediments typical of Puget Sound bluffs may erode The latter is best done by armoring the shoreline up- several inches per year, whereas massive bedrock drift,effectively starving the beach of needed sediment such as that in the San Juans may erode only a faction of an inch per year. There is a tendency around Puget Sound to exaggerate • Beaches are narrow. Beaches provide excellent the rate of long-term shoreline erosion, yet ignore the potential for short-term natural protection,dissipating wave energy over a bluff failure. When developing broad area and limiting the frequency with which near marine bluffs,we need to recognize that both slope waves actually reach the base of the bluff. stability and chronic shoreline erosion affect the safety of the property but that, if the geology of the site is These three conditions are most often met on classic known and the structure is adequately set back, pro- feeder bluffs such as Birch Point in Whatcom County, blems will be unlikely. Scatchett Head on south Whidbey Island, and Green Point south of Gig Harbor. As one moves downdrift —Hugh Shipman(1993) within a coastal drift sector,beaches generally become wider,and erosion rates may diminish. • 100256AS.SEAp/1 • 2-27 ■ Table 3-1 Shoreline Armoring Impact Categories IMPACTS TO PHYSICAL PROCESSES 1. Direct Impacts a. Temporary Construction Impacts _ b. Permanent Impacts • Placement of Structures/Loss of Beach Area • Impoundment (Loss) of Sediment Source Behind Structures 2. Indirect Permanent Impacts a. Downdrift Impacts from Sediment Impoundment b. Modifications of Groundwater Regime c. Hydraulic Impacts from Armoring • Increased Energy Seaward of Armoring • Reflected Wave Energy From Other Structures. • Dry Beach Narrowing/End Wall Effects • Substrate Winnowing/Coarsening • Beach Profile Lowering/Steepening • Potential "During Storm" Impacts ' • Sediment Storage Capacity Changes • Loss of Organic Debris (inc. LOD) • Downdrift Impacts of the Above 3. Cumulative Impacts a. Incremental Increases in All Impacts b. Impacts to Single Drift Sectors • Downdrift Sediment Starvation c. Potential Threshold Effects IMPACT LINKS TO BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES I. Direct Impacts a. Temporary Construction Impacts b. Permanent Impacts • Habitat (Substrate) Burial or Removal • Change Vegetative Cover/Organic Inputs 2. Indirect Permanent Impacts a. Modification of Groundwater Regime b. Changes to Shoreline Environment Due to Hydraulic Impacts • Loss Spawning/Foraging/Rearing Habitat for Fish • Loss Migratory Corridor for Fish • Substrate Changes Reflected in Benthos • Effects on Shellfish 3. Cumulative Impacts a. Incremental Increases in All Impacts b. Potential Threshold Effects tt Macdonald, Keith,David Simpson,Bradley Paulsen, Jack Cox, and Jane Gendron. 1994. Shoreline Armoring Effects on Physical Coastal Processes in Puget Sound Washington. Coastal Erosion Management Studies Volume S. Shorelands and Water Resources Program,Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia. k- 11='6 7- 12.5-1' 4q-78 3-2 10025862.SEA/2 • 3 ( 100 ST 4 All Ck P.O.Bo. P L Q t1/444 March 3, 2014 le\ uJ Elaine Rosencrants U P.O. Box 71661 16 U k-0.5 \AL‘t" Clive, IA 50325 b (\livQnr Re: Geology Hazard Assessment, kerG v(6 J QtC,2• Parcel 9076200106 I i 2530 East Marrowstone Road 60 L '4 V Norland, Washington Dear Ms. Rosencrants: Stratum Group is pleased to present the results of our geology hazard assessment of the above referenced property on a shoreline bluff. The purpose of this geology hazard assessment was to 1) determine the suitability of the property for the siting of a residence, 2) evaluate the risk of slope failures, and 3) provide general site development and maintenance recommendations for development of the property adjacent to a potentially unstable bluff. This evaluation included a visual inspection of the property and vicinity shoreline bluff including multiple inspections of this reach of shoreline associated with other projects on the east shore of Marrowstone Island over a period of the last 15 years, review of available geologic mapping in the area and a review of available imagery of the site and vicinity. Based on my assessment of the geologic conditions at the site, a home can be constructed on the property such that the home will not be at risk from slope failures for the life of the structure (100 years) as long as the recommendations in this report are followed. The home should be set back at least 50 feet from the edge of the shoreline bluff slope. However, please note that other regulatory issues may require a greater setback. GENERAL GEOLOGY The Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30 by 60 Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington (Pessl, Dethier, Booth and Minard, 1989) indicates the steep shoreline bluff exposed on the subject property is underlain glacial till and advance glacial deposits. Observations on the bluff face on the subject property and on the bluff face in the vicinity of the property are consistent with the mapping described above. The upper 20 feet of the bluff face and the entire upland area on the property are underlain by very compact glacial till. The lower 50 feet of the bluff consists of compact advance glacial outwash sand and silt. S � March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment SPECIFIC SITE OBSERVATIONS The property consists of a nearly level to very gently sloping upland area bounded on the east by a very steep east facing shoreline bluff. The overall slope of the upland slopes gently to the west away from the shoreline bluff slope. The upland area is covered with a mixed forest and an understory of a variety of vegetation. The overall slope of the steep shoreline bluff averages approximately 45 degrees; however, portions of the bluff are steeper and nearly vertical. The total height of the bluff is approximately 70 feet. On vertical portions of the bluff soils on the bluff face are exposed. The upper 20 feet of the bluff consist of very compact silty clay and clayey silt with pebbles, sand and cobbles. I interpret this unit to be glacial till. This section of the bluff is nearly vertical to vertical. The exposed soils on the lower 50 feet of the bluff consist of medium to fine sand and silt layers in a very dense condition that I interpret to be advance outwash sand and silt. Where the slope is not vertical or nearly vertical the slope is covered with grass and brush as well as a few small trees and slopes at an angle of approximately 30 degrees. Slope failures along the lower sections of the bluff have occurred within the past few years on portions of the bluff face on the subject property and on adjoining properties. Routine slope failures are apparent all along the bluff to the north and south of the property. The failures are of limited area and involve shallow soil failures due to the erosion that has taken place at the base of slope on a periodic basis. The presence of trees and brush on the slope suggest the recurrence interval of slope failures is on the order of decades. Landslide debris is present at the base of the bluff, but its loose nature and location at the top of the beach is such that erosion of the landslide material should be expected. The bluff is eroded primarily by wave action that undermines the base of the bluff. The shoreline at the site is exposed to relatively open waters of the Puget Sound. Wave action during high tide from south, east or north winds will erode the base of the bluff. This is particularly true during high tides corresponding with low pressure which adds an additional foot to two feet of water height combined with strong winds. The low cohesion sand unit at the base of the bluff is readily erodable. Because of the very compact nature of the bluff soils, the slope failures appear to consist of relatively narrow slab type failures of limited lateral extent. Ravelling of material off the exposed soils on the unvegetated portions of the bluff, and periodic shallow topsoil failures also play a minor role. The material eroded from the bluff face is removed from the base of the bluff and transported along the shore towards the north by wave action. Stratum Group File:3.3.14 2 March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment Deep-seated large scale landslides have not been observed on this shoreline reach and the underlying geologic units are not susceptible to large scale landslides. No seeps or areas of seasonal wet areas were observed on the bluff face. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on my visual inspection of the subject property and vicinity including observations made over the past 15 years during multiple inspections of this shoreline bluff reach, I conclude that a residence can be located on the upland portion of the property such that bluff erosion or landsliding would not threaten the structure within the expected life of the structure (100 years) as long as the following recommendations are followed. The residence should be located at least 50 feet from the top of the shoreline bluff. This distance will be adequate to provide protection for a residence for at least 100 years using an erosion rate induced bluff recession of 4 inches per year plus an assumed additional bluff top failure of 10 feet(.33 feet/year x 100 years + 10 feet = 43 feet). It is my opinion that this rate of erosion induced bluff recession is very conservatively high and that the rate of bluff recession is likely much less rapid. This interpretation of a slower rate is in part supported by a review of historic aerial photographs of the shoreline on and in the vicinity of the property. Please note that this setback distance may be precluded by other shoreline setback regulations which may require a greater setback. I do not anticipate that the development of the subject property will cause any negative impacts on the stability of the slopes or the shoreline bluff as long as the following recommendations are followed. Because the bluff is an eroding bluff, slope failures should be expected to occur on a periodic basis. The only way to prevent continued erosion of the base of the bluff is to construct hard armoring at the shoreline at the base of the bluff. However,the eroding bluff acts as a feeder bluff(erosion of the bluff provides sediment) for the beaches north of the subject property, and any shoreline armoring will have a negative impact on properties down drift from the bluff. The construction of shoreline armoring on other properties may cause an increase of erosion of the subject property. The owner of the subject property should contact Jefferson County officials regarding any proposed shoreline protection projects along the bluff or any shoreline protection construction. There are currently no shoreline-armored areas along this stretch of coastline. Soils on the upland portion of the property are vey compact and are slow to drain due to the very compact glacial till underlying the site. However, the upland area of the property has very gentle slopes and drainage is generally towards the west and not toward the top of the bluff. Stratum Group File:3.3.14 3 March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment All storm water drainage should be directed away from the top of the bluff and should be allowed to infiltrate into the ground surface via dispersion trenches, French drains or splash blocks. Site grading soils or debris, landscape debris, or any other material should not be disposed of over the bluff face or placed at the top of steep bluff. Bluff erosion and stability is overwhelming dominated by shoreline process. If not for the erosion at the base of the bluff,the bluff would be relatively stable. The rate of shoreline erosion may be reduced if trees are left within the established setback from the top of the steep slope. Large trees within landslide debris can effectively protect the base of the slope from erosion for long periods of time. At least one tree per 30-foot center should be left within the geology setback area. Trees left within the setback area can be limbed for view purposes. The septic drain field should be located at least 50 feet back from the top of the steep slope. The minor volume of water from a household drain field will not cause slope stability problems at this site. The septic drain field should not cause problems for slope stability, as the general slope direction of the upland portion of the property will not direct drainage towards the top of the bluff. Please note that there are inherent risks associated with building on lots near or adjacent to steep slopes. These are risks that the building owner should recognize and be willing to accept. If conditions appear different than those described in this report, or other concerns arise, we request that we be notified so we can review those areas and modify our recommendations as required. Stratum Group appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions please contact our office at(360) 714-9409. Sincerely yours, ' 0 .. as ,' j S atum Group 'd - /714' ,Dan McShane, M.Sc., L.E.G. ** 5 Licensed Engineering Geologist 1 . , i , .1376d cr4., Daniel McShane stratum Group File:3.3.14 4 . 4 If , 1.R 11 r I,4 !i R � m i 3 ,.; ! s 411411''r 1. I '41. ''' i'i € b 4A M • Z ii } { . . , , ;,,, • } . s °r.r$�.Y + ��..':.t'` �r'✓tir f_ri.'t i<P I �} i i�1�:_1j �s�1.r.�:1,y y 77 • , ' F• ;� �9 r �\r 'l�! .> " i M ay 3 t a . L am s,i,li ..- `p 'i_e'° i'. �,f..t s. d }1I l D 11111 1, l i~ a y , . _i° 1. �jI - 3 r.•m Pill F�t x 1• '3 1 ' �1 i ;A <L iqqie{4 � ,dig _i 111 iH "k 11111 , 161} #1> 111 { J r rr!t e { q1.FP! S, -t I /' 1 n 7 +� f, � c <1 ° t■ F M1• I t i t' f r } j r 1 � c 1 l'i!I•i4 r t11iH= (iid a- ( f1.t1r � t,� ' c . 1 s x A A ,',11!; -rr ,111 111! E f x' 1, `ate i -----L 1 ; s 3 at' ° f .r "- �e' (" ti m 2 !ii N, m 11.}1 "-1'4-' - `: d t. 7f'I r'� J r I�f I. k ; 1kr"1 p -1 z' 111 ,O irl' . ! ' m 1i1,11f1;#11111;° °ii`iciltiit#11111 11.111 11111.1111°iliiliFiiClll'i1EPilili' "`f}#'1111},31 11111 ill 1ilii6ili=lCii}111111 1E, I}1i1111 ldi{4ii11111i1tlts •_ i�., .^ ,< .irllri¢ifi: 1tl 1,1.€irt,..1„,f1tiiitiII1F i'Iigi}itlii.t1111111 111111 I P=11, 11IIltl i€1.1 1.'i 'ill Iti1r1'°itIPritiiiiii 11! ciI' 1111}111:1i1s31 tf;lit 1 f 1 ill ii 1'dfri;i.tltH, { !1i1 iP'r,t"0 e 11111111[1 it:1'11, it1111iII II' ''100)11 11111tH,15 rtrrrii 11ii,Pillt i11.11 illait "1,,it}iiili4''P, tr l t1 i 1.'1.1'14" r°•ila st lq f rl =1 Iffilf 1 11ir dtf it11,i f1.iilr i ,1t r.did et rricifl f€I rtr i;ftrl tif}ii x€y ri, 111111 I!I•Pririi9 e it l i.11 kl e 16;1.1..,,'ll f I !tai' 9 is*it t 311[ P,ipt.iiriiitir{111111+ i`+'i ii6 1111.4111111111.1.g 1il}ilitllCiIillifri'ii i 116 ill. r"'1.Iltifr 1,.111 ,1(;itlllgi'l til•1€ iP1r i,isli 1,11 it11P14r}iiiiiiir•i 1r III i}rilrililtri`ii!!!iri iillr pii-t$1,4!I g t€ i}tf; 1.[d;111.1,11 1111 tl', t if#1111,.@1,it iii iiir:I i rr 111;E I flit r1 t,1,r#: 1.3 111 i# '• t= €€ tit 11, 1 i t II t.ilitl0,tlii 1 1.9 i} P P 1 111 1 '{f F P 1 P1'rli i } IIIfl tl Y 1 ii' 1'1 1 1,$!1 i 11 iIi°(rrltr' Pji a!I +1s C 4 ;1,,1,Plltyr}ti 11it`'11it 111111 i'il}'i y;. I•f1111 1.;i 11 1.tt 1.41- 11 ii 1 4111 1111 i ii 1 i! [E r t { I S! E } t r f1l tt 1. f�i it r € ,i t 1} its 1 f '} +ii ii in 1r ;t P I 411 •�' Iii { i°'°i,i` i y it 31111 i 11111 1.1 1 i r i`1111"1 !it€ it }3t1;f i 1rt1 itt if Pi 11. Iii t°if1 1111 I i 1,∎111 11111∎III fii f''liit 1 rt°!¢ 3 `011E i 411 i fiii i'111,1`,i It 11f€1dt11 1`. 11 11'-1.'l lit 11i1ltr 1'P'!'i{ iri r1,111`Iiiiilif-rileItiili it i' Hirt iiiil iri[tidi` 1Pr itili'Itiili 11E iii Ii1a Iii"irl 11tH ,1"111'ili}F}l1. it"'f1. 11th}1.q.:'itti,Pelilirlll!irf1l i! itil ttail1i1 Iiiri4Etl 'fir}Iii'sjiiil}ii1 fi! �1i r1 .tltrli,,li Itr,i r!itllii!{.irrii EIii,1,i 16•iPik,.eiii..iiifrPrl.t Pi[1i�Ei i,•;1,lilli}. P3tti1.°, 11,,111-iiteitr.rll,i 1,}. 1rdi1 n#1111111 11111 1.=1151 k.e-;1 i di i r E, 1° 1 ;} }311 iiirii 11 11'11.11}`1 it11 Pi' 1,`1,14`11+°ltifiii=tili'iE° 11.}tiii1fsP111131i11'iiilii'i P 1141 `iii Ii11'11`'dl`ttmi.iiiit iririi ilr`t 11. P}tit111111}11.1 t'1ii1 iiliiPP l,a#g}i[°41.. 111%• m 1rit 111��irlll"1.F}liiitl:Bil#i.tilrlliii r1.'ii`iljri,cli'PIjE!1111 1°ii Wi`t111['r1i'i'if ril i C€ill irlihritt tii4iri4il`siitilaifl 1°• 1 ti rai'itrra 411111 iii11''ti€iii`IPie'iljei 'i'l,'i,'1 r1.` ti i}' if it r r1. t,{,t I i it rii i r }i 11111. B.ir i 5 ii E NV/111°'i P E e.,1111 11[1111'11 t i3.i it rr,tI„ iri,c Ei(II 1.P i,f, ,it "#t 41111,11 Pii;''111111 i r 'l1.€1111}i!§§ii tiid 4iI ,it+I rlrE. .t it 11111' .1111 a ! !' i i' P 1r i .11 11. ro 11,11 tPP f}n;1. ;1..t, i€1.1 11.11° i CIII'i it iiiti°t 11th "liti.ri[iiliit°ili>ill'Illil'F1i,r ir,is,ii!ri'i'Eli°izllyi{P,iirr r :ii1=I 11}}111.f111111iiAlrii'1161'iii:}111Pil11ii rr5I.11t}itti,t 1g¢Past ti°iP'[t iiti°fii•r}i; 4, `� 1.1,P,1.t riiito ii#I Eli1'ii!(11111!11 1.i',1rrill fif'iilii t1 ilf;E;iil¢:.i!i`i!'t}iiPziifP,i 0:.111 4trilil,glr E rr111. 1'1 di 1 t'litte 1..l i}ici:llrittrc ft°irt° II air 1110 131,1,,1 1,r i z .ptliltilli {iii 1,1 P1 i t l lr;slll'cii t til'i}li;'11 }E: ' '1111;•t ii.E°:..1.r t11rt1•,,,11151 iifillit}4r tilit'1111 iit€t;.-,?}tP1'11 r1.liflillfi'1111}4 i}111`1 116111 4ilr p 1P-d'ft'it€1t#ii#ilri€t'd 1111 1ri1 011E i r 111} 1'11[1 E} 1111 tr r 1111;it 1c1 1.,1, € t,iii, 11. r 1'1.t 1 f .} r1 4 i P.i 1. I r. 1 f 111E i'flt4'.i?tfe 1115 11!1.1 1}1111115 i:�it's`.il.ltliElitt.r.a f tiltyi r t •`ii'ir111,r t.1.isa i i 111E 1.4 'E11 rs1 111115 1p t.1. 1`1.{1 i,1€11'1411 11.11 f x'x6E1°ill T; i 1 di r r1,1111 m iri111t 1111111i11'1ltir1111! i 1111`x;1:11'111 lit}1.r11ti11'li} li11141 t !P.111 tit`,€11'1'C ii 1 i! ! .t Cr r 11 rrll:lyil 111111 1{ i 1,11`1l,l:l(i.ii iii }116 1111,1 i'•1i i€ '111 111"11,1111 1 c s}11.11 I }ii 1rP 1 i r 1110 t:411 1rt 111E 111'11 1,'i 1.l:c1.11111`111 111 i1> 1.:i}[111111E 341 lil}r1 1.1.11111'1 :'41.'1i .11. rf°1111 Pi.11111 t tit t i',rilli P1id 1t 1•r}€. i iEi 1101',11.1'11111 ii, i e 1 Iii iir P 11111 a,1 ' r1 1111i1111'Il'i 1.e ¢ 1111 11',11,1 ,111111 1 are 1r 41110, ii 1,P`; P !111.1,'•1;114111 1 1.1.1 P 1111 1 , i 11 f 1,r i 1il!i 1.•i 11 i 1•,;1,1 1 i i 1[P 1r'11111 5 1 t.r,i 1 11 1 i,1 111111 t 1113 t 11;11 1 t14rt .i 1 i ttriri'fr ,!i r, tt rlr It i i 4.E}ttrri#r,it( 1 11. i t 11.11.1111 aP I 413'1 1111i11; t 11111 1.1'` liiifti 1.111 1411114111#d 1l 1ii1,}ti It,itcilli 4 lilii i1;111E ,111{ 1111 irrEii,lil'iiiifP gill 1,[11;111€111 Pi'i't'f 1.'1 rlt11j1i}ttr it 1111} Ilifllrile.i eirtirrlllll 11 t1r't111iti1ir 1111 E (thad.irith.i,iIl tr.rilili istiillll 1111?1,1,11 lilrslti#11}1111 tE1;11ti„iriiiiilu31rr1>! 1111 tliilrllilPr 114111E 111E 11111111!111111E}1.l 1rigPi4irF 11d11E1€EG 11141111 a#111111=xl€1.,k 1111 z tthll}€€1111 1,1. r1.}iii tl[iitill 11ilii,;li1}i 11''1''11 11111111 111111. 1111 1i1'111.11101�''{trliii€iiIli i !" " 1 t 0 11.-{ i I 111 ' ,i P lP 11,1.1'1.ti %r t, it 1,1 1 11t 1 }l1} 1r .:I z till 1141 : itEit itif It rr Pt i P 1.}1 1.•i i,111[11 11 r,1 r1. P 1, 1hk 1,111 1 ftt�(i'i'i x 1 1 i P r1. 1 l I 1 iii 11rr1�1 t, 1,11(1;Fi Pdi lll # ;f i i 1. i it i1. 3t 1.1E 1 ' `11, 1, ii 111 1ii i1 ' 1.#P r't ' i }ltai : ii ll it 111 ll 1111 Eirf 1 I}1111.1°i►�1 I t tlttFi,E 1f 11!1i: iii !ii1t! I: 1 tr P t r liiI!111 }i4i1I'l ;iitti'(3`allllii 11i0ud1rItl }`illii!ii it 1it111 '< €'_ t`�Ii Ix, 1 1 1[i 1 t € !11. 11. 11101 [ii is i 4'1iltlli 111111.1;1€i!Ili II j°t1r iii If1ii1j ;i }}#i, ii[411 }f1.t,. '"i (f t}. t 1.1 r e 1. i i 1 i g P i iri 1111ii;;liii f1. iri i i 1.liiliir litiilfi iiislri111!Ili 1i11I'It' E 1iiii li`Ir ili,liltt! 'I 1111 '11111#11 } 1 itr'11['11 [[5 ' ;1111 1.iir r t , i 11. il 1 i'grit!t}t ilp fi I 11. t it1 t e itei I '•11`I 111}}1 ti 11 Pt 1.'I''Ps ti I ir'1 111 r tiif t}1111['1 i 111111 t 11. it II 1 P I Oat!! l i } r € if g111"111111 1111111 11. 1`}111 E1lffla' € JP t ■tp i 11. P.1,1 1111,11111i 1 1 1 t 1.1 1r ill it t}1. Et i ' 11'4111111!}11 11111.11`11.1111 11 i 1111 rr F 4IP i i 11. r1. 1it1 1 1I I 111.1,1 tat,. .#t r.iPilii 1' 1 111 1.1111, ,111„ 1„ r i €•' € 11111E€tit' 1111' 11 117„1 1 ii 11lttiii lj l °i 111 tit Pj1i1 11,!11 r1 r1. it i r ! i }, 1. 1 r1. 1111 i i 111 k 111 a 'i 1 ii ti r 4 1lli 11111 i11114 111111 111 1 1 411 41 l0 Pf r 1. 1 r � t111!g (i 11l1. 111111 1111'11 f1 i1!1 t 1 /#, i•� ii t € , ' r. r1. it 11 i - tp til 1.1 i f 111 iEi,i lil t rr }f 1111 1101 t ! i !i#riE r 11 P i i i P 1 t t t i 1 [ { !i i 1 1 t i i,1 i i 1111 r 11 E i#i t 1[1 r 111 11111,f1. i?"I 9li ii1 ii It i �t j q161,1 iltlsii 111, 11 1iiilil,i l'j it f 1° f1P 111E « 1 i i t r=Pt i 41 Hill 1. E } P1f€1 ,I i i t lilt dii (1 1�iili }`111 iii I I[ 1 i i i,i [ i i 1 1• r It r 11. I t Fit i #i 1,1.1 i ii 111,1 1i11litiil34"6 Ff111f�i:1111 r P i t t,i s iiir hill i}1fIi11ii#lit[tliiiiiti4 1 4.soN cp JEFFERSON COUNTY ;K s °{ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment . o- Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning April 14, 2014 ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS • PO BOX 71661 CLIVE IA 50325-0661 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2530 E MARROWSTONE RD CASE#: MLA13-00135 Dear ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. In response to my December 17, 2013 letter requesting additional information, a geotechnical report prepared by Stratum Group was submitted. This report presents a much different setback from the top of the bluff than the report submitted at the time of application (which was prepared by Zenovic and Associates and is attached to this letter). Please submit a stamped letter from Stratum Group that addresses the difference in the results. Please be aware that DCD will require that a Hold Harmless Agreement be recorded with the Auditor's Office it there is any recommendation for a setback less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. Please note that I have not yet received the restoration plan requested in my December 17, 2013 letter. If you have any questions, I can be contacted by phone at 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by July 13, 2014. Pursuant to Jefferson County Code, JCC 18.40.110(3) and (6), if the applicant does not submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, Department c) Community c-vela 2ment Staff c: File TERRY MC HUGH \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_Addl nfo_Requst.rpt 4/14/2014 E N O V I C LAND SURVEYING & ASSOCIATES 1st6cn rre Suite . \ C O R ; O R A T E J Port Angeles,Washington 98362 (360)417-O)u: Fax- it `} E-mail:zenov1c@oi:'fious.Ae. ) 1 October 5, 2009 ; `; COUNTY C " r,F r vrI OPMENT , Mr. David Clark 1599 Highway 169 Winterset, IA 50273-8471 Re: Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson CountyWA Par. No. 976-200-106 ' Dear Mr. Clark: Zenovic &Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the east side of Marrowstone Island along Admiralty Inlet, in Jefferson County, Washington. Access to the site is directly from East Marrowstone Road; the site can be reached by following Highway 116 east from Port Hadlock, across Indian Island to Marrowstone Island and then north to Meade Road, east to East Marrowstone Road, and north to the property. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. A portion of the site is mapped as an Unstable-Recent Slides slope on the Jefferson County Shoreline Map and the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. Slopes designated as Unstable-Recent Slides are based on evaluations completed in the 1970s Subsequent sliding has not been documented by the State and is subject to our review and conclusions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will not induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website (1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (USDA/SCS, August, 1975), the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, and Jefferson County Unified Development Code. In addition, several boundary surveys of properties located along the bluff to the north and south of the site were reviewed to determine the approximate rate the bluff in this area recedes. Page 2 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, the lands encompassing Indian and Marrowstone Islands are classified as being in the Whidbey- Dick soils association. Whibdy-Dick soils are characterized as being well-drained to excessively drained, undulating to hilly, gravelly and sandy soils, underlain by glacial till or loamy sand. The Whidbey soils are derived from weathered glacial till. These soils were deposited by the ice sheet during the Vashon stade glaciation. The Vashon Glacial Till consists of a poorly sorted mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashon-age ice sheet. Finer portions of the soil consist of clay, silt, and sand. These fine particles comprise a moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components (gravel, cobbles, and boulders) are firmly imbedded. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic &Associates, Inc. conducted a site visit`DVn c R 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immediateV iii® arit4 - . °• - hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. =G fr:..k_. Existing Slopes °� _ - The property is nearly level extending easterly from East Marrowstone Road towards a marine bluff that forms the east edge of the site. Near the bluff, the upland area gently rises such that the land at the top of the bluff is about 4 feet higher than remainder of the lot. This topography prevents storm water runoff from the site from running over the face of the bluff. The toe of the bluff is situated on the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet. The upper portion of the bluff is a near vertical formation while the lower portion is less steep. The material creating the less steep slope at the base of the bluff is the colluvial material that has eroded from the bluff face due to wind erosion and the natural freeze-thaw cycle that loosens the bluff soils. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently Whidbey soil types as shown on the Soil Survey maps. Inspection of the bluff face indicates that the depth of the surficial gravelly sandy loam is as expected for the Whidbey soils, extending to a depth of approximately 40 inches. T = ,Fay-; soils are less stable than the underlying compact glacial till, so , r,..{]t' i , upper area of the bluff face is anticipated. ; 1 \ .` LV [ � JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COrv1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 3 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 Vegetation Site vegetation consists of a scattering of cedar and willow trees with a dense understory of native rose bushes, sword ferns, salal, salmonberry and nettles and pasture grass in small areas that were previously cleared. A single, broken cedar tree is located approximately 5 feet from the edge of the bluff. Hydrology and Drainage The upland area of the site is basically flat and East Marrowstone Road effectively cuts off any runoff from the west. No drainageways were observed on the upland area of the property or on the face of the bank. International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand;silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for structures within 75 feet of the top of the bank. CONCLUSIONS The bank is shown to be Unstable — Recent Slides in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. This determination is based on review of available aerial photography in the 1970's: review of available photographs and survey data indicates that continued sloughing of the bluff face has occurred. The bluff formation at this site is characterized as a "feeder" bluff. Historically, soils eroded from the bluff are deposited on the beach areas at the base of the bluff and transported from the beach by wave and tidal action. The mechanisms that create this situation - exposure to high tides, storm waves, and poor soil structure—impact the rate of recession of the top of the bluff. Review of the aerial photographs and the measurements comparing the existing conditions with historic data indicate that a rate of recession of the top of the bluff in this area is typical for the area of Marrowstone Island that fronts Admiralty Inlet, ranging from 6" to 10" per year average. This recession is not typically a yearly occurrence, but rather tends to happen less frequently but with a larger impact (see attached information). A loss of 1-2 feet of land at the top of the bluff is not uncommon, but general • curs-enn during the years with the most extreme winter weather. :- E C E,a U r :1 J I�' JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 4 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County.-, lNA____ `` J October 5, 2009 I RECOMMENDATIONS 1' General The bluff at this site is a feeder bluff that has had an average rate of recession of around 0.67 feet per year over the last 25 years. Assuming a usable life of 75 years for a house constructed to current standards and using a safety factor of 2, a minimum setback of 100 feet is recommended for the site. This setback area should remain free of any site improvements and maintenance should be limited to the trimming the brush as necessary. The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches feet below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 125 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. Slope Maintenance The existing broken cedar tree at the top of the marine bluff is dead and has the potential to cause a premature failure of the top of the bluff in high wind conditions. The tree should be removed by cutting it off at the ground line. Do not disturb the root system. Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System Drainfield If an on-site sewage disposal system is required for this site, the on-site sewage disposal drainfield shall be located as far as practical from the shoreline, but shall be not less than 125 feet from the top of the bluff. Page 5 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 The drainfield shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the permit for the system, as approved by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. Septic tanks, pump chambers, and collection and transport piping shall be placed not less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. All systems components shall be water-tight; piping within recommended setback area shall be tested for leaks prior to cover. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. David Clark for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a steep bank on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein is the property of the Mr. Clark and may not be used without his permission. The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely, Zen vic& Associates, Inc. t phen M. Zenovic, P.E. Pr ncipal Engineer Enclosures Fc: JN 09223 Cc: Waves Waterfront Properties/Barbara Blowers w/enc. 1 X11 \II! --- 1 _._..-- i '- 02133202,7 ---- . , 02 1 3320a- (' - ----___-_ ..._,..„:______________ • k. : ..... . . . ,-i--. '-1 .' :::;.- • .,, . ___-_,.1 i- . - t f - 9762r-K3107 r .; ,.., . . k...... .. . . :,•. . . -____.... . .. . , k:. - . •T'`,_ ' ____., ':. • ,,f i -: r r ' 07200 I 1 0 . 976200 05 nt,.• ■ . . . ; ,• - ....... ,. i :: - •n ■ . ' ....... . . ., .• , • . 2'76200 1 1.7 - , g76.200106. --------____ • • • . : .. ..,...... . : ., - -.• , :f:- l ' .. • • t. 1 -,.._.: • \ J i 1 I 1 ; P762E10102 ; ..- i;I ! 2 ...---' 0 762 eXt 1 1 4 i l'Y , , .....--... : y :' f : f , 4 ..---' i , ' - '..4,,}i3;.••• i f ) 976200104 ,,:: ...`. i: r I I i' i r i .0 . -"'.----■-i i lie',i if 1 r --------.--_ . cg. . i --976200'201---------: -0 "------=._—_-_------ s 1 I; i --7 :=- 7-5)182ompC!)7620DIP4---. ih. s 111 i Li ! i , .1 .1.1 .". .■ f 0 E. -.. 9762-CX)S01 ... : c . r ... 97621 -4E10Q I. ii ''.., 1 i . ' ;;-j i / . ; . IY ii I i . I i ; a/ ; 7 62 i / i1970064 1 .:. # ill / j .-: - ..i ; 9767006738 31.1 I!f f' . . tre it/ J i Maz rroacixf try./.e' n Carty ewe-4 Se-eicm GIS if 11 J: w/ P2-ortA ■IF:24=r-e17-4.0.3 COu NI-ty (06-N56 l're - Ill if jEFFERSO%COLIN-ii 1 1 DEPT.DE DOVW.: -Ef DEVEI.ODIv,EN! http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrarne wa.us/Websjte/mspubfMapFrehtfll 9/22/2009 Donna Frostholm From: Terry McHugh [tmch @olypen.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:22 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Geotech report Attachments: 2325_001.pdf Hi Donna, I finally received the updated Geo-Tech for the Rosencrants spaad and have attached here. I will be doing some planting on the site where the invasives were removed in the next 2 weeks. Thanks, Terry McHugh Original Message From: <1ilsptOolypen.com> To: "Terry" <tmch@olypen.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 4:46 PM Subject: Attached Image This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.corn 1 STRATUM GROUP P.O.Box 2546,Bellingham,WA 98227 Phone(360)714-9409 March 3,2014 Elaine Rosencrants P.O. Box 71661 Clive, IA 50325 Re: Geology Hazard Assessment,Shoreline Bluff Parcel 9076200106 2530 East Marrowstone Road Norland, Washington Dear Ms.Rosencrants: Stratum Group is pleased to present the results of our geology hazard assessment of the above referenced property on a shoreline bluff.The purpose of this geology hazard assessment was to 1)determine the suitability of the property for the siting of a residence, 2)evaluate the risk of slope failures,and 3)provide general site development and maintenance recommendations for development of the property adjacent to a potentially unstable bluff.This evaluation included a visual inspection of the property and vicinity shoreline bluff including multiple inspections of this reach of shoreline associated with other projects on the east shore of Marrowstone Island over a period of the last 15 years,review of available geologic mapping in the area and a review of available imagery of the site and vicinity. Based on my assessment of the geologic conditions at the site,a home can be constructed on the property such that the home will not be at risk from slope failures for the life of the structure (100 years)as long as the recommendations in this report are followed. The home should be set back at least 50 feet from the edge of the shoreline bluff slope. However,please note that other regulatory issues may require a greater setback. GENERAL GEOLOGY The Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30 by 60 Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington(Pessl,Dethier,Booth and Minard, 1989) indicates the steep shoreline bluff exposed on the subject property is underlain glacial till and advance glacial deposits. Observations on the bluff face on the subject property and on the bluff face in the vicinity of the property are consistent with the mapping described above.The upper 20 feet of the bluff face and the entire upland area on the property are underlain by very compact glacial till. The lower 50 feet of the bluff consists of compact advance glacial outwash sand and silt. March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment SPECIFIC SITE OBSERVATIONS The property consists of a nearly level to very gently sloping upland area bounded on the east by a very steep east facing shoreline bluff The overall slope of the upland slopes gently to the west away from the shoreline bluff slope. The upland area is covered with a mixed forest and an understory of a variety of vegetation. The overall slope of the steep shoreline bluff averages approximately 45 degrees; however, portions of the bluff are steeper and nearly vertical.The total height of the bluff is approximately 70 feet.On vertical portions of the bluff soils on the bluff face are exposed.The upper 20 feet of the bluff consist of very compact silty clay and clayey silt with pebbles, sand and cobbles. I interpret this unit to be glacial till. This section of the bluff is nearly vertical to vertical.The exposed soils on the lower 50 feet of the bluff consist of medium to fine sand and silt layers in a very dense condition that I interpret to be advance outwash sand and silt. Where the slope is not vertical or nearly vertical the slope is covered with grass and brush as well as a few small trees and slopes at an angle of approximately 30 degrees. Slope failures along the lower sections of the bluff have occurred within the past few years on portions of the bluff face on the subject property and on adjoining properties.Routine slope failures are apparent all along the bluff to the north and south of the property. The failures are of limited area and involve shallow soil failures due to the erosion that has taken place at the base of slope on a periodic basis.The presence of trees and brush on the slope suggest the recurrence interval of slope failures is on the order of decades. Landslide debris is present at the base of the bluff, but its loose nature and location at the top of the beach is such that erosion of the landslide material should be expected. The bluff is eroded primarily by wave action that undermines the base of the bluff.The shoreline at the site is exposed to relatively open waters of the Puget Sound. Wave action during high tide from south, east or north winds will erode the base of the bluff.This is particularly true during high tides corresponding with low pressure which adds an additional foot to two feet of water height combined with strong winds.The low cohesion sand unit at the base of the bluff is readily erodable. Because of the very compact nature of the bluff soils,the slope failures appear to consist of relatively narrow slab type failures of limited lateral extent.Ravelling of material off the exposed soils on the unvegetated portions of the bluff,and periodic shallow topsoil failures also play a minor role.The material eroded from the bluff face is removed from the base of the bluff and transported along the shore towards the north by wave action. Stratum Group File:3.3.14 2 March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment Deep-seated large scale landslides have not been observed on this shoreline reach and the underlying geologic units are not susceptible to large scale landslides.No seeps or areas of seasonal wet areas were observed on the bluff face. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on my visual inspection of the subject property and vicinity including observations made over the past 15 years during multiple inspections of this shoreline bluff reach, I conclude that a residence can be located on the upland portion of the property such that bluff erosion or landsliding would not threaten the structure within the expected life of the structure(100 years) as long as the following recommendations are followed. The residence should be located at least 50 feet from the top of the shoreline bluff.This distance will be adequate to provide protection for a residence for at least 100 years using an erosion rate induced bluff recession of 4 inches per year plus an assumed additional bluff top failure of 10 feet(.33 feet/year x 100 years+ 10 feet = 43 feet).It is my opinion that this rate of erosion induced bluff recession is very conservatively high and that the rate of bluff recession is likely much less rapid.This interpretation of a slower rate is in part supported by a review of historic aerial photographs of the shoreline on and in the vicinity of the property. Please note that this setback distance may be precluded by other shoreline setback regulations which may require a greater setback. I do not anticipate that the development of the subject property will cause any negative impacts on the stability of the slopes or the shoreline bluff as long as the following recommendations are followed. Because the bluff is an eroding bluff, slope failures should be expected to occur on a periodic basis. The only way to prevent continued erosion of the base of the bluff is to construct hard armoring at the shoreline at the base of the bluff. However,the eroding bluff acts as a feeder bluff(erosion of the bluff provides sediment)for the beaches north of the subject property,and any shoreline armoring will have a negative impact on properties down drift from the bluff.The construction of shoreline armoring on other properties may cause an increase of erosion of the subject property.The owner of the subject property should contact Jefferson County officials regarding any proposed shoreline protection projects along the bluff or any shoreline protection construction.There are currently no shoreline-armored areas along this stretch of coastline. Soils on the upland portion of the property are vey compact and are slow to drain due to the very Stratum Group File 3.3 14 3 s ' March 3,2014 2530 East Marrowstone Road,Norland,WA Geology Hazard Assessment compact glacial till underlying the site. However,the upland area of the property has very gentle slopes and drainage is generally towards the west and not toward the top of the bluff. All storm water drainage should be directed away from the top of the bluff and should be allowed to infiltrate into the ground surface via dispersion trenches,French drains or splash blocks. Site grading soils or debris, landscape debris,or any other material should not be disposed of over the bluff face or placed at the top of steep bluff. Bluff erosion and stability is overwhelming dominated by shoreline process. If not for the erosion at the base of the bluff,the bluff would be relatively stable. The rate of shoreline erosion may be reduced if trees are left within the established setback from the top of the steep slope. Large trees within landslide debris can effectively protect the base of the slope from erosion for long periods of time.At least one tree per 30-foot center should be left within the geology setback area.Trees left within the setback area can be limbed for view purposes. The septic drain field should be located at least 50 feet back from the top of the steep slope. The minor volume of water from a household drain field will not cause slope stability problems at this site. The septic drain field should not cause problems for slope stability,as the general slope direction of the upland portion of the property will not direct drainage towards the top of the bluff. Please note that there are inherent risks associated with building on lots near or adjacent to steep slopes.These are risks that the building owner should recognize and be willing to accept. If conditions appear different than those described in this report,or other concerns arise, we request that we be notified so we can review those areas and modify our recommendations as required. Stratum Group appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any questions please contact our office at(360)714-9409. Sincerely yours, Stratum Group Dan McShane,M.Sc., L.E.G. Licensed Engineering Geologist Stratum Group File:33.14 4 4�¢ oN c, JEFFERSON COUNTY ti : ° IA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment �,�sko Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcd @co.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections(Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center 1 December 17, 2013 ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS PO BOX 71661 CLIVE IA 50325-0661 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2530 E MARROWSTONE RD CASE#: MLA13-00135 Dear ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The site plan needs to be revised to clearly show the building envelope. Based on the setback requirements in the geotechnical report, all development must be setback at least 100 feet from the top of the bluff and the stormwater infiltration system must be located at least 125 feet from the top of the bluff. Although the SPAAD permit is not vesting for stormwater, the building envelope should take this setback into consideration. Attached is a form for potable water. Complete the form and return to DCD. During a recent site visit, it was noted that vegetation had been removed near the top of the bluff. This department does not have any record of issuing a permit for vegetation removal. Submit a restoration plan for DCD review. If you have any questions, I can be contacted by phone a 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrosholm @co.jefferson.wa.us . Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by March 17, 2014. Pursuant to Jefferson County Code, JCC 18.40.110(3) and (6), if the applicant does not submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90) calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. "ncerely, >• .,. . /� 'S..��.r� iep'rtment o' •r'munity Deve•pment Staff c: File TARRY MC HUGH L- h...)byMA- X, JG EY w;yorevnerfta/ fle'c//-1-1 R5u P ) vc Enyiyr7,,Ynt,,, l ki( tG7 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_AddInfo_Requst.rpt 12/17/2013 (n N v c) Qi o N "I ; 'I O 71 rN 0 o W \ N_ o jp � Z t o ill E ® X u) N � O 1 , o y O O O Co Cr) O O O O O r G� p O n t C O n1 ri1 C C Rl n1 m 0 1, O Z NN Z n l Z O O O O O O O O (z o ,1 O --1 C 1, '^i —I Z Z -i —1 -i n z 1.11 y il :A Z CO CO O y Rl -0 O n1 O O D W O © � m -� u) Z )N C) CA C) I- r CN - _ EAST MARROWSTO�IE� ° -- --- -- ROAp Z I� o N05°40 33'E I n W• X co rn I 0 1 100.41 ' ®� K •1. 0 �s i1 I yf,s / n.1 k--___1 0) / 1v I 1 \ H\ � � o O / � � z 7 \ C z N D Z O c , CO 00 2 0 0 O OZ � N N �) �� � O O c.n °o C) 00 -s7 C Z� Z� 0 2 t O O n C°3-, ,all P �y �� .s Z \ �)NZ`I Om may r-°- s p � � o CO -0 rri Ei� 71j NC8 II 2 i—T c...1 0 v _ti N ti ti °' V �, o _L , V Cn N v i °p C.r IV 0 0 X r O N f.,4 Oo m oaa _ °cZi c Pa 07.99; ■ o z t> w NN113 3 2'06 Z 4 _, 1-11 • �W Cr) (-N —Z rn I °I a F z Z GI O :(-- _______ :n 2 i a ° .__..� C �- A • ' o rn h r � O)� I( � �Z Z co o ixm No c� W z — r, � � SEA wq INLET c zo � � °°m 3 oz X p r L,ETERM/� B-UNDAR/E �� a o `° CI 0) o m m e m �" t? NED TH/S SUS'EY o a ti N n Map Output Page 1 of 1 • ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend Selected Features JC_Roads Parcels-H ems County Zoning MPR.SF Tracts R oral Rosdent at 1:5 ...... .... Rural Ressdenta11:10 Rural Resaental 1:20 MPR-Smgte Famsty MPR SmolaFam MPR Resort Complex Parks and Recreation ■ MPR Open Space _ : :: a ■ Kura!Forest ■ Commorcat Forest Inhoklmg Forest Heave Industrai 87&ZC4'C5 A�rpcn CPF ■ MPR rage Center AP 1:30 I Rural Village Center 1.11 ■ Resource Based Ina Light Ind ustroal MPR Recreation Waste Mgms CPF Ll'M LYC Crossroads GC Crossroads CC e. ® Crossroads-NC .<.., AL 1:20 UGA-U Titan Commerclai UGA Urban Light Indus'ral ill UGA MDR UGA IIDR JGA-Punhc UGA LDR i; {y UGA Visitor Orsonted Commas.:n: MPR-ORN Drmnon CF-hd M RLO Coeunercal Forest M rneral Resource Overlay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:15:21 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma —4111 I/I ■ 7------'I :(1° 076200108 1 976200101 1 11 \, — '''.'LI I11 976200107 ,„ ■ ------- Legend Selected Features , | :c_xmus / p"="/"* Shoreline Designation-Arc 96201 u=servanc*» =roan � ll 1 iv, Con sertra°*w""., : u== /1 Suburban Island 976200102 /V w".rat 976200112 i I i /4/ Conservancy i I 1 l / w"""*�"",*= ^� m� I ti s/oamvw If )/ ---°"""°°` momxyo` --- A ' I' / 97620050 *nuvmmw / / / — v~=,=v��"*"="c""*o��m"=nom esz�ue '/ ..�� FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JefersonCountydoeanotattenttotUoaoouraoyofthodataoontaineUhaminandmakeo no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:01:15 2013 ' � 6nn cac . ' —. 1 1/1/201 3 / Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 WAMIIHGTOfl STATE Department of Ecology Coastal Atlas 6/23/2011611 24 AM _ — ger .,.....,w -N^ Alp � A ro • to 37� mill • • Photo Reference: 060623_00629 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Marrowstone Island-Admiralty Inlet Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 73Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels, 3351 Kb) Approx.10 seconds for 56kbps modem;2 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx.8 minutes for 56kbps modem;70 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00629&vinta... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 021332024 I 11 1 t /-- a 976200108 976200101 + • I 976200100 1 it 9762W107 Z.—f ii[ i1 976200110 I 111 'l Lege nd 976200105 Selected Features I j JC_Raads Parcels+! 3?irx;" Heritage Paints A9.,,,..:„, , %.1x., rd W 7:_cam.:.s-1 CQ.Irj Ccm.-s Sc' c^.Gts 9162'-{c%r- 0=X=12911 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:04:23 2013 Q ' � k t1--2 t , r http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 02,.332043 III 021332024 '� �� 02,,332005 ' 976200106 i I 9761{1���` i---- 1 976200109 i 97620014/ ON 976200110 1 ( Legend 976200,05` n Selected Features I +� JC_Raads i y E Parcels-H ¢ Priority Habitats and 976200111 ( 12 976200106 Species I{ t i re 1 C 976200,02 976200112 i i i /1 / i �i i 9r6200/04 i — 9rl100201 J ~ 9rs2cxa� A � 97620:60' 976200609 11 ,1\sr xcreded T':c!rs-m Carty Cmrd Sc.-.ces GI.S 976204609 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:04:54 2013 1 ) i Ki' http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• 02'332023 ,... I i I itt 021332024 I —_ 021332005 • t q I I 976200108 I11 11 976200101 I I f �� 976200109 976200107 ' Iritt��', I I I I 976200110 / 1 976200105 01 Selected Features I JC_Roads �f 8 n Parcels-H ( 976200111 II 976200106 II Wetlands I II W I i 976200102 / 91e200112 I II I i 1 I 976200104 f I 1 976200201 1 1 976200601 ,E i 1 l' i( 976200601 916200609 I I \1s*-xaeck d:ri_c e—Ixn Cwt.,.C -r.1 Sc-rccs f t5 976201°3 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:06:42 013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 11/1/2013 I Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 021332024 . 021 2 3201:8 i i I i 11 i _ . 1 I 976200107 1 11111°11;killlibi" OM: Legend 976200 110 *��m� Selected Features ( / / �i JuLmOmwm li F p���� � ^ t Seismic Hazard 976200111 l I 976200108 1 i I f 976200102 k ,I 976200112 i / , i I 111 - w^mz0"a ' _ o����_- _— � '^momm^__ ] II / / � / 976200601 976200609 / / L- ---� ---- ysz�� - �� "=~`=^�*~*,""^"�,c�°^a�"m�� ~ .r~ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- JofemmnCountydoaonototteotVoth0000un*oyof1hodatanonCsinodhoeinondmakoo no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 10:07:26 2013 ° hMn eor ' ' ' ..- 1 1/1/201 3 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 021332024 is 021332024 1 1 1 J (111 C 1,'_ , I 976200106 97 i I 5200101 A�1 /________ r r 976200109 �I 9762001{7; �w s d� L_ 976200110 I I I I Legend g76200tpy Selected Features I - JC Roads y Parcels-H 976200111 iC Landslide Hazard 1 97820{9106 s.acs I I i N sac,alc if Ili ' n 976200102 i 976200112 i if ii/ 1 1 _ I ii / 976200104 _—976200301— _..__ A 9762006111 I 1 976200601 976200609 I [ �,. 44,aas xa+dad by-eb3�sen Canty Carrx s .r.GO �• - -`= 11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:07:51 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• _..__.. 021332023 027332024 I �, 027332005 1 r 976200108 'I 1 97620910*. r I �' 976200109 1 — 976200107 lrg:'. I 11 I I I Legend 976200110 i 976200105 ( 0 Selected Features I JC_Roads i I I Parcels 41 1 C_ a FE MA FIRMS 1 976200111 1 a 976200706 ■ A I i ,„ ANi 1 ' x503 III 4 I 111 Other I 976200102 1 i 1 976200112 i�-I 1� _ Al 1 II 11 $7620!0104 / 976200207___, 1 976200801"_._.1 I! I 076200601 l'976200609 II f \lar."-ceded by-r,-hal Corky Cara.Se,cr:GAS 97620°6°9 0— FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:09:26 013 01 61t . http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 02,332024 916200146 I6200,0 976200149 Z.-`1Q1 Legend 076200ta0 y 6240,od selected Features JCRoads Parcels-H W9.200111 Critical Aquifer Recharge • 2 Areas n suss=uNK F--]� I 1 SARPA+SUSC I I sU SC n SARPA „2 `. I I SA R PA.U N M 916100 ,;916200104 ,,b200201 I 9762006O1 916200609' J t: r FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:10:04 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map - ) S.,,,:...22.".:.'.0a /41 / 4 A t i Legend 9t6Grq-r., 0 Selected Features ~•/i JC_Raads (- Parcels-H I Shoreline Slope Stability I/ n U n5l r / T n U J e :oRRec en e Lantl tla J I w1'4 A'xi ■ f 916200 04 r::c;:C: ::' 916200&:' , I f / f •.•i ,i.-.i. -.sue �==== FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:11:39 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• Orla 021 At. f" 62601•,- ' aiN•Aiit•I 6 076200109 1S Q Legend ,,g7620 D•10 10 00,•111•14 0 Selected Features {dve JC_Roads r. Parcels-H -7fs200111 7620014: SIP2 _ At R.sk SIPZ I I tg R nit SIPZ 7 Coastal StP2 .v, d 97620010 • 1 976200601. su.nod zr.o.o.Ton County Gaut Sornoes GIS 976200609 .FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:14:41 013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 i ' Page p8�e { of 1 I ' � , ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ,.:+25332005, I) I/ II I ' ~ � .. /11 I Till II ^ (\ � 1,976200108 1 ��� 1� C�- 0C■ Legend ' U / Selected Features ' ~�. �/ JC_Roads - l , I | Parcels-H 976200111 ,I t ) 0 / como � , 976200106� \) �/ mm=��" � I 1 ''' if ( ,/I t 1 . .,(,:k /if/fil �� �r�^u°�". 1 976200102 II i 1 , (',„ ._ ---_ ( 1 I ill// II 9762062H/ F —976200601— /11 II f ii Jfi 1 ( ,:i 1 / w~.~"°�~.~'.u°�^�°�m~°"�o� ~~~^~^ , 'u,1m1.11IMMINE:='h: . FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 15:55:12 2O13 ' 1 httn -- 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend Selected Features • I JC_Roads Parcels+) FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:20:42 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map -s ; \ -Ar\-, lySi fT. Sf East Beach RA FA Sr 6Eari-r ca,p; .6 4 — Legend k . '" L,. Selected Features + F f l Township Lines j JC_Roads Btil 17 t r Parcels-H USGS Tapos ' '-.2 ly4Ytiiiine 61r -• Rork --.1 I 1.L.IIC iii..r CF•maf:rr • _ L T t . ti w —Gnffdh Point Rd— r- ---An _ _ I • FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:22:36 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. I .) . ,f re ip -2022 ;' — -- r =ry 1 *21332.-c"_- . 1 h 02'332024 az r I L,... , 1,..., _ _ I 9T62+�62?3, 976200108 R .; Mira % II I I - !t- Legend 1 Selected Features CRIS JC_Roads 976200202c Parcels-H 97620011( 2011 Aerial Photos 976200106 a 976200102 976200201 976200112 f)2°1 9762'00104 Y 44 20E ' u ' 976200601 97620060. It 'i . , ., a ae FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 01 16:20:20 013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 11/1/2013 Z 2 W i Z i i i > ° °a e I� O W J O wgW'� Y O a ` ry m• U W Q II d�� `A\ S 8 8 \ a e " o hr) --"wrioNINalinie(U:- d3 "re= ii R o : \ e N z (nI— � X o x c, 0 (3(-NO£-££b/( 3N) n 87,-; (n gel•,:8',1 J Q nr,=,='„d prim d � 11l $8SWO o�Ww! W °/ S--v v730/.[ 31 vis o Z Q v ig 2 O CC Lu g ' r ono e.° ggoo 7.P3n,o _ ifi In oro 26oNd o. °0!,,Z,; o q$Q b IN b e 6 I ^' g� ``,s F oFyo: ry ^o t 8. 8b� W g g 8° n 00109, ° "gin F+id*a `ie 801g10 0 88 d 8 'f. ry�0, .4> OZ'wl 90'90 10'001 W P$ 8b° ^`” 8kz 1..., M LSIr SSTI CL FYI ovoa._ 8$° . ° '',�� � 'sue rloxcrlm F „ 3N01 9e 8" « S'�'ObaVry s'aY "� oo'oo£ oo'os - '3 Ls041 y° a�s® - a Lc' 8 g° ;4" _ b ;2 -%° a4� - QF 8 �� o er_ ♦n 8' -.9 ern ry Rio g$n RF6� R:d� -,® di C9l 4 G91 8o� v 0 8M e " ;4 PA ry a.c .g'2 d ' *0 �O w d® ry �� Ve g<"S rAu d e^ry Asa^ s 4'n _ J ?8 0 9 a O no �! ra_ gg 0; ry - i �'9 � - 8 < R•° 08 ry o� 08 g rv< 00'00£ °J / "�' ry �. ems_ °.a PM ry reek w� z ..o "Y 00'OYL - O oL't. M m 0'04'99! OY991 a 0499{ L o 00'OLZ I lSL{ S' Z 661 N • O e x cV _ 1 yti z "� nog u, ao fix. 8 °M ,, M �„ . 8 . g�x \I o m & 8,° R:N�° g M 1O _ W∎ rv= q �W fe "rv'8 X r 8°8Y 8rv� d $ N8 x 8" d& a•o..o M ®0 �uNi O 'iW7 °m"" s Wrc $ J a9 �"' ____ :8 00"OOZ 'c P., n £0'10! - ■ o ',-,,..` grv,,,,a .., v Oa✓1 d N n 099'[5 n pi,IMO-§%;O O 1 `'''''''d B5'1i9S r et,." g 0,- e ~ M1 OHWti111 r 4n, " r .iFO gM1d' _1 '' 00'OLZ rvMN" 00'051 00°'°. Q '� OY'£6 51'LL{ Blast. ' mN-d "' Z 8 9° C7 Rgt �1I� ' OU' * oo 8 ?� =:' o �� R .? � 'I Yf� (69 xv,) 1' o0'0ez-- o� h� Fz g4gie 91 t%ti '° o'II R-$ $ 801 f1: _ �� 8_. r'g , gi W: :3) "v lb; j:87 �m rai iryx�d 8 °alx v��{7 hi/ 9t�00b FRb`�la ry°x�P H ^�8 Y 22 5°o b�pry 3:51;,,,,, rW�`6 \�' J' h N'IMNj rv< 5 t°O 6!), �g 2, i 1976 20000 i x / 9 6 g W 0 02W 313.8232oh02.9 -"' A 2.00Ch' (31-N0£-Z 4/{ 3N) P• 3 — • n 8 888 e< N d o — .S 3 < z 8 • .... w ; — i w i om o 0r0 ° 88 8<�_IS, . `O8 H < F m ,,- .= o yS a w O w w — I 8 V1 � a� J x ,. e'.2.8 30 zo v 8 6.1 gam' iL N _ 616, ›.-A '� 1 oa o F ° �i $ k Zam o — 8 f,, 6.,4 - °a§ o "��oLL 8 o8€m � u ;i wo - y w8y�y �� 8 • a axle >.? p�grc o�cia zs NFOgw g O d 6°l i i aF 7 W 112N Q O 4 w Un? v U a road Page 1 of 1 ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 2530 E MARROWSTONE RD ROAD NUMBER:C593909 ROAD NAME:E MARROWSTONE RD ADDRESS:2530 APT: REAL MILE POST:2.54 R APPLICANT:DAVID CLARK ADDRESS CREATION DATE:12/29/09 PARCEL:976200106 LEGAL:NORDLAND BLK 1 S100'OF N390'E OF CO RD GRID:F-5-D FIRE DIST:1 ZIP:98368 POSTAL DISTRICT:PORT LUDLOW PLANNING AREA:3 VOTING DIST: CEMETERY DIST: HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST:49 WATER DIST: SITE LONGITUDE:122.68524 SITE LATITUDE:48.05214 SITE COORDINATE TYPE:ENTRANCE ACCESS LONGITUDE:0 ACCESS LATITUDE:0 MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS http://isserver/Address/RoadAddressDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=C593909&ADDRESS... 11/1/2013 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 976200106 Printed: October 11, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner PRJ09-00211 MLA09-00411 CLARK P Application Received: 12/22/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD No findings, conditions, or permissions found. RAP09-00075 MLA09-00411 CLARK I I Application Received: 12/21/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/7/2010 Case Finaled: RAP&911 -East Marrowstone Rd 1.) The Applicant may upgrade the existing private road approach to#2530 East Marrowstone Rd. at mile post 2.54 right. 2.) A 12 inch diameter concrete culvert 20 feet long was previously installed at this location. S If the Applicant wishes to upgrade this access, a new culvert a minimum of 12 inches in diameter not to exceed 40 feet in length,to accommodate a 10 to 16 foot wide driveway with 10-25 foot approach radius is required. If more than one culvert is used, both culverts must be made of the same material and be connected with an approved band. 3.) The ends of the culvert should be bevel cut in accordance with W.S.D.O.T's specifications. 4.) The applicant must place a minimum of 2 inches of crushed surfacing to the right-of-way line. 5.) The grade of the approach shall follow the crown of the road to the ditch, and be no greater than 2%for 20 feet from the edge of pavement and, be such that all surface water shall be directed into a ditch line and not onto the county road. 6.) The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all vegetation on their property to maintain the minimum sight distance requirement for this location. 7.) The applicant shall be responsible for any and all damage to the county roadway and rights-of-way, including the integrity of all survey monuments or boundary markers. 8.) The road approach is approved for its LOCATION ONLY as approved under ZON09-00135. This approval is valid for a period of 5 years from the date ZON09-00135 was approved. A ROAD APPROACH PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED. Proponent shall contact the Public Works Department at 360-385-9160 prior to any land disturbing activity for installation of the road approach to obtain an approved permit. Once the permit is issued it will be valid for one(1) year. The Applicant shall adhere to any conditions as set forth in the approach permit. ZON09-00135 MLA09-00411 CLARK I A Application Received: 12/21/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/31/2010 Case Finaled: SPAAD: Site Plan Approval Advance Determination for residential development 1.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage system design approval. 2.) Any removal or disturbance of soil in the area evaluated may create site conditions that are unacceptable for the installation of an onsite sewage system and may invalidate this approval. 3.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on March 22, 2010 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs)under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: conservancy shoreline designation; stable/unstable recent slide shoreline slope stability; eagle; seismic; severe landslide hazard area; SARPA&SUSC aqufier recharge area; high risk SIPZ. 4.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 5.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 6.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses(2) All Commercial Uses (3)All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments(6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 7.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type,geologic material,and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 10/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells).The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 9.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. ii A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L). 10.) A Geotechnical Report dated October 4, 2009 prepared by Zenovic&Associates was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. 11.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices(BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 12.) At the time of a building permit application a stormwater plan in compliance with the Stormwater Managment Manual for Western Washington(current edition)shall be submitted. If the proposal can not meet the prescriptive requirements of the stormwater manual, an engineered stormwater plan shall be required. 13.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 14.) The site plan as submitted with the SPAAD application on December 21, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped,approved site plan dated March 31, 2010 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) This approval is for a SPAAD only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 16.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 17.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 18.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 19.) A minimum of two(2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcet_Cond.rpt 10/11/2013 Page 2 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 20.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified Development Code(Section 8.7). The criteria for approval is as follows: 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff comment:The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal,fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment: Staff comment:The parcel is approximately.89 acres and was created through the Olympic Canal Additipna#7 subdivision on July 6, 1964 under AFN 180200 and complies with JCC 18.30.050, Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health reviewed the application with regards to septic. The department commented that the soils on site are suitable for a septic system and condition the SPAAD as such. The PUD Quimper public water supply will be provided to the parcel at time of building permit application. Proof of potable water is required at permit application. The SPAAD does not vest for potable water. The parcel has direct access off of East Marrowstone Road, a county local access(C593909). An address of 2530 East Marrowstone Road, Nordland has been assigned to the parcel. The approved SPAAD site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. Sections JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070 of the Jefferson County Code requires the project applicant prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction, to address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow. However, the parcel is located within a state approved water system. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting. Application of Coordinated Water System Plan(CWSP)fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source, and storage. The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building permit application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan,together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21 C RCW. Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i)identifies the construction of any residential structure of four(4)dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment:The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 10/11/2013 Page 3 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 21.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five(5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five(5)year period,the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval-Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements(e.g.wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.)and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic,wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 22.) Due to a recent Washington State Supreme Court Case: Futurewise v.WA State DCTED, Ecology, Case#80396-0, the Critical Areas Ordinance(Chapter 18.22, JCC)does not apply to development within Shoreline jurisdiction. Only the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (Chapter 18.25,JCC)applies to development within 200 feet of the OHWM. 23.) Minimum setback from East Marrowstone Road right-of-way shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from top of shoreline bank shall be 70 feet or as follows: The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty(30)feet or one(1)foot for each foot of bank height,whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet. 24.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 25.) An Eagle Plan may be required at time of septic and/or building permit application. 26.) The applicant shall apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption at time of a building permit application. 27.) Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in rural residential districts are subject to the stormwater requirements in Chapter 18.30 JCC and must meet the"Area of Impervious Surface Coverage"to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the administrator. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface, which includes rooftops, driveways, concrete, etc. 28.) The parcel was created through the Nordland Subdivision on January 20, 1892 under AFN 8807. 29.) 30.) 31.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 32.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 33.) Excavating for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. 34.) Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 125 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. 35.) The existing broken cedar tree at the top of the marine bluff is dead and has the potential to cause a premature failure of the top of the bluff in high wind conditions. The tree should be removed by cutting it off at the ground line. Do not disturb the root system. Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope,thereby reducing slope stability. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 10/11/2013 Page 4 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 36.) If an on-site sewage disposal system is required for this site, the on-site sewage disposal drainfield shall be located as far as practical from the shoreline, but shall be not less than 125 feet from the top of the bluff. The drainfield shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the permit for the system, as approved by the collection and transport County Environmental Health Department. Septic tanks, pump chambers, and ndcoll ect o n a d t a n sport piping shall be placed not less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. All systems components shall be water-tight; piping within recommended setback area shall be tested for leaks prior to cover. 37.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development u r sua n t to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ZON13-00046 MLA13-00135 ROSENCRANTS P Application Received: 10/11/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 10/11/2013 Page 5 of 5 Cr Cr) H O O 0 LL N _0 Z LL `�.. O H O CO -7 LID N .. .. LID \ Q O 4- a) — ,— co —7 Z 0 "O — C+) Q O o L J -0 x Cr -o +-1 co c U O = I- L.LJ O C) Z +-I -0 H 0) 0) Q -- O -C -C C CU f� Q -0 C] C) U Q Z O 7 C3 J Cl a -.. U I— F— G O C ,— cc CA co a) a) U CO -0 = 0 LL_ U a CC O "0 I- C = C \ ,� 0 J W OO O �J ' O Cr) J U O CO -O - J Z CO CO C = 4 O H I- O -- O) W = Z I 3 I— CO Z H CO C= N -0 CC O Q W CIS U co C w N LL J J W Z O W 0_ C) O W CO CC W U) O Cr) Q O CO r- .. CC ,- - - X • O O OD CO C1 N O co Q ¢ Cr CO Q O O H I- •- H O J C*) C) Z w J ti Z C!) ¢ F- U w v ¢ CC x w W x Cr C� J U H a) J Z co W O Z C) 0_ H CO O CC Y W 0) CO Q H CD O J Cf) M d O J O J C9 Z CO O 4-, �. U W C3- U CC 10 - +-P O CO O CO 7 O O N O ti O N W CO CO O` O CO O ti O O .— O) O O O "O L N U a) N ti a # C O W a) .. L 3 L co Y C — a) O +-, a) O a) a) = a) -- a cc L a) o co a) "O > co U L L C1 - O OO O_ C- C.) OO X +-■ U "O X CO CJ) d OO -- -- (O a) I— I— X F— co 03 c}- Ai. , o2v c_06 JEFFERSON COUNTY 2°1")' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax q Q' www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment `�`FIIN ---Master Permit Application MLA: ( 3S Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): S.F. a.h Tax Parcel Number: 974- 200 - Atep t d 6 Property Size: (acres/squaro foot). Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 25/5-0 6. May-coo.)$44 024• pi b.. u,JA- Property Owner(s)of Record: €t-d tL 2.03cAe +nti Telephone: St S"- 3 a J - S 2.01- Fax: email: Tew,n e+ 'e.el.e■n.e Aorttiv,sSe Mailing Address: ft 0 eoc. "1 l t.G t tio+'fa.+c.. Go ti Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): -re ti-r-•'j M o gaG.14-' Telephone: 374 — cf S?0 Fax: 3 tl■S -`{19 L email: 414G(4 0(1)Qvi. Co M Mailing Address: 80 `4 M tea --r -ro WAsena UJic- What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building ❑ Critical Areas Stewardship ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or R I1 V ❑ Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a), C(d) U V ❑ Manufactured Home .❑ Modular - ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnam Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Pub i •lities** ❑ Change of Use ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment I ! OCT 9 2Q13 0 Road Approach ❑Short Plat** Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑ Binding Site Plan'"" ❑ Propane ❑Long Plat** JEFFERSON COUNTY ❑ Sign ❑ Planned Rurai Residential tD rrOr is** ❑Allowed"Yes" Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑ Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** 16 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑ Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre-Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: ( DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate l 4- IA t"(# �1 : to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE " / �� it a ."!� Date: Vie. ,a/3 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staff's access a io t of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the app •at he or s prior notice. Signature:k, Date: fba./.2-0/3 The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfer-•e -sponsib" or adhering X'd complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this discd er and igns and dates it below. Signature:,:' � . _ _ Date: O/�' - .10/3 G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Forms\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc S 20^-6`' ` ` 43(=7 Oiq't IL/ ytits- fir. • 7-21k; i u Att+ JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 1.1 621 SHERIDAN ST., PORT TOWNSEND ,WA 98368, (360) 379-4450 bQ=:'f =:Ott i 1 .4:#2 SOIL EVALUATION :.$ SuzanneLMartin '`•n71Pt li "rittNs�a�r uv.:. Ott PROPERTY OWNER David Clark exp.2/11/10 SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 33 Township 30N Range 1E Parcel # 976 200 106 Subdivision Name Nordland Division Block 1 Lot(s) So 100'of No 390' Date Logged: 27 November 2009 Logged By: S. Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the depths at which significant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers.occur. Primary Area; Reserve Area; SOIL LOG #1 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG #2 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf 0 to 3 in. Dark brown sandy loam 0 to 6 in.Dark brown sandy laom 3 to 48+ in.Light olive brown loamy sand 6 to 19 in.Yellow brown loamy fine sand to in. - 19 to 48+ in. Olive brown loamy fine sand to 52 in.water level @ site visit to in. Anticipated water table 42 in. Anticipated water table 44 in. Roots to 40 inches Roots to 39" inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments Reserve Area; Primary Area, SOIL LOG #4 yp gp SOIL LOG#3 Type 4;0.60opd/sf T e 4;0.60 dlsf 0 to 7 in. Brown sandy loam 0 ,to 10 in. Dark brown sandy loam 7 to 25 in. Olive brown loamy sand 10 to 16 in. Yellow brown loamy sand 25 to 35 in. Olive brown slightly cemented sand 16 to 41+ in. Olive brown gravelly loamy fine sand to 35 in. Hardpan to 41 in.Water level @ site visit Anticipated water table 33 in. E o I V FE 'nticipated water table 33 in. Roots to 35 inches I I'Ui 1 -oots to 35 inches Health Dept. Comments !±1�I � � - ealth Dept. Comments 1! I Reserve Area; I L1 L SOIL LOG #5 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf JEFFERSON COUNTY S•IL LOG #6 0 to 6 in,Dark brown sandy lo... DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to in. 6 to 18 in,Dark yellow brown loamy sand to in. 18 to 36 jn,light yellow brown loamy sand to in. to 36 in.water table 10 December 2009 to in. Anticipated water table 26 in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to 26 inches Roots to inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:UNFOHLTHISOIL.FRM 1/00 y - E N 0 V I C LAND SURVEYING & ASSOCIATES 301 East 6th Street,Suite 1 C O R P O R A T D Port Angeles. ashingcon 98362 (360)417-0501 Fax ax;360)417-0514 F (l Ct lj r E-mail.zenovic@olnrpus.nec it t i! J JEFFERSON COUNTY October 5, 2009 pc-P- CO NIT,DE,JELOPMENT Mr. David Clark 1599 Highway 169 Winterset, IA 50273-8471 Re: Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA Par. No. 976-200-106 Dear Mr. Clark: Zenovic &Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the east side of Marrowstone Island along Admiralty Inlet, in Jefferson County, Washington. Access to the site is directly from East Marrowstone Road; the site can be reached by following Highway 116 east from Port Hadlock, across Indian Island to Marrowstone Island and then north to Meade Road, east to East Marrowstone Road, and north to the property. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. A portion of the site is mapped as an Unstable-Recent Slides slope on the Jefferson County Shoreline Map and the Washington.Coastal Zone Atlas. Slopes designated as Unstable-Recent Slides are based on evaluations completed in the 1970s Subsequent sliding has not been documented by the State and is subject to our review and conclusions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will not induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website (1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (USDA/SCS, August, 1975), the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, and Jefferson County Unified Development Code. In addition, several boundary surveys of properties located along the bluff to the north and south of the site were reviewed to determine the approximate rate the bluff in this area recedes. Page 2 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, the lands encompassing Indian and Marrowstone Islands are classified as being in the Whidbey- Dick soils association. Whibdy-Dick soils are characterized as being well-drained to excessively drained, undulating to hilly, gravelly and sandy soils, underlain by glacial till or loamy sand. The Whidbey soils are derived from weathered glacial till. These soils were deposited by the ice sheet during the Vashon stade glaciation. The Vashon Glacial Till consists of a poorly sorted mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashon-age ice sheet. Finer portions of the soil consist of clay, silt, and sand. These fine particles comprise a moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components (gravel, cobbles, and boulders) are firmly imbedded. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic &Associates, Inc. conducted a site visit a f ® -s , 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immediate if6 hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. Existing Slopes The property is nearly level extending easterly from East Marrowstone Road towards a marine bluff that forms the east edge of the site. Near the bluff, the upland area gently rises such that the land at the top of the bluff is about 4 feet higher than remainder of the lot. This topography prevents storm water runoff from the site from running over the face of the bluff. The toe of the bluff is situated on the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet. The upper portion of the bluff is a near vertical formation while the lower portion is less steep. The material creating the less steep slope at the base of the bluff is the colluvial material that has eroded from the bluff face due to wind erosion and the natural freeze-thaw cycle that loosens the bluff soils. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently Whidbey soil types as shown on the Soil Survey maps. Inspection of the bluff face indicates that the depth of the surficial gravelly sandy loam is as expected for the Whidbey soils, extending to a depth of approximately 40 inches. To- - - e = - soils are less stable than the underlying compact glacial till, so - =N 6 " upper area of the bluff face is anticipated. _1 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT II Page 3 Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 Vegetation Site vegetation consists of a scattering of cedar and willow trees with a dense understory of native rose bushes, sword ferns, salal, salmonberry and nettles and pasture grass in small areas that were previously cleared. A single, broken cedar tree is located approximately 5 feet from the edge of the bluff. Hydrology and Drainage The upland area of the site is basically flat and East Marrowstone Road effectively cuts off any runoff from the west. No drainageways were observed on the upland area of the property or on the face of the bank. International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand:silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for structures within 75 feet of the top of the bank. CONCLUSIONS The bank is shown to be Unstable— Recent Slides in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. This determination is based on review of available aerial photography in the 1970's: review of available photographs and survey data indicates that continued sloughing of the bluff face has occurred. The bluff formation at this site is characterized as a "feeder" bluff. Historically, soils eroded from the bluff are deposited on the beach areas at the base of the bluff and transported from the beach by wave and tidal action. The mechanisms that create this situation - exposure to high tides, storm waves, and poor soil structure—impact the rate of recession of the top of the bluff. Review of the aerial photographs and the measurements comparing the existing conditions with historic data indicate that a rate of recession of the top of the bluff in this area is typical for the area of Marrowstone Island that fronts Admiralty Inlet, ranging from 6" to 10" per year average. This recession is not typically a yearly occurrence, but rather tends to happen less frequently but with a larger impact(see attached information). A loss of 1-2 feet of land at the top of the bluff is not uncommon, but general • - - during the years with the most extreme winter weather. ' E 0 0 Q uu JEFFERSON COUNTY EM DEPT.OF COMMUNITY Page 4 Mr. David Clark- Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson Cou4rWiee L October 5, 2009 RECOMMENDATIONS JE ERSIN COT I yDF_ClfrrENT General ____. ____ The bluff at this site is a feeder bluff that has had an average rate of recession of around 0.67 feet per year over the last 25 years. Assuming a usable life of 75 years for a house constructed to current standards and using a safety factor of 2, a minimum setback of 100 feet is recommended for the site. This setback area should remain free of any site improvements and maintenance should be limited to the trimming the brush as necessary. The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches feet below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 125 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. Slope Maintenance The existing broken cedar tree at the top of the marine bluff is dead and has the potential to cause a premature failure of the top of the bluff in high wind conditions. The tree should be removed by cutting it off at the ground line. Do not disturb the root system. Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System Drainfield If an on-site sewage disposal system is required for this site, the on-site sewage disposal drainfield shall be located as far as practical from the shoreline, but shall be not less than 125 feet from the top of the bluff. Page 5 Mr. David Clark - Property on East Marrowstone Road, Jefferson County, WA October 5, 2009 The drainfield shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the permit for the system, as approved by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. Septic tanks, pump chambers, and collection and transport piping shall be placed not less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. All systems components shall be water-tight; piping within recommended setback area shall be tested for leaks prior to cover. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. David Clark for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a steep bank on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein is the property of the Mr. Clark and may not be used without his permission. The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely, Zen vic& Associates, Inc. t phen M. Zenovic, P.E. Pr ncipal Engineer Enclosures Fc: JN 09223 Cc: Waves Waterfront Properties/Barbara Blowers w/enc. - ,, - -.- 1 [..2 ,,1`;141 - !: C2-.33217:23 i, , . 1 0213320.24 1,- 021332Cets .--7,------ — ; - e„ , .• • ,.. 5376200103 ..._____.... S76200,Ot t; _ ? i f ' .476200109 ' 5.$767,21„Y"`.210,7 _____________--- . , ..____. ,.- 97203110 ______; ' --- -- .-- - , . '• , 9762,24:1 1' , c.,762(Y/1 Oe _ _ _ __ f , . $ . ' ... ! i t',:--''' . ' ` 016.21X,102 1 . - 2 '--------: $.1762,Xel'.. ,----. .■ ,. ' , TEK2001 -4A ----9.7 04 1:___........: f.,..ci,r.. 20 1 i 4.4 — .9762001c/4-_-_--'d 6-: ------ :7---- :Ii7826C•Sr), — ir ,,,,i. : ' II ' s? 97620060, V b , 762om , -- —73' 9vi. tz —; . . 9762X09. .,... ' ; . ' _.. ! 976200608 - 11/I',' ,„''' , ''• M a=gra b).jelLsal C,(1-rri C'' S°-.'"c C3P3 ti.)/ Cory ti`-3661're. L "i ----- COUNTY 11_ r.,FDT eijEcF0F%[",4,1S'i° CO c NN,i1)1DEVEI_Oci 9/22/2009 http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFraiTie.htm DEVE PMENT REVIEW TIME OEET ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS MLA13-00135 Da e Time Comments ,i i, 0 //J 1441 i ri, i 11. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt October 11,2013 1.1F CONSISTENCY REVIElli Project Planner: Masr#MLA13-00135 Review Type Project Description ZON13-00046 SPAAD Primary: ELAINE L ROSENCRANTS Site Address: PO BOX 71661 2530 E MARROWSTONE RD CLIVE IA 50325-0661 NORDLAND WA, 98358 APL TERRY MC HUGH PO BOX 441 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Project Location: Parcel Number: 976-200-106, Section: 33,Qtr Section:NW1/4,Township: 30N,Range: 1E, Site Address: 2530 E Marrowstone Rd Nordland WA Parcel Number: 976200106 S-T-R: 33-30N-01 E Total Acreage 1 Legal Description NORDLAND BLK 1 S100'OF N390'E OF CO RD Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 3,f Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No:0)000 (9 16-�' �} ,chool D 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property GSV NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES N [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag YES NI [ ] Shoreline Designation: NO e/Ls e rV [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: NO 04-,-te_ mac(, m/4417 Stream Type:YES N- "`mod Fish&Wildlife: NO tt'1-ed i r �r4 yVL A,r wt e- lei---15--o° n '/ Wetlands: YES NO ► G Rare Plants:YES N13 Seismic: ," NO Landslide: a3 NO Flood: YES N9, Erosion: YES N Aquifer Recharge Areal l9. NO $'fi .2—-j-5u - SIPZ: none At Risk - ,,, Coastal CMZ: n° High Risk Modera e 'iskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YeaN 0Ii2 ' [ ] Forest Lands: YES N - Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES N_Y [ ] Archaeology: YES N,O, [ ] No Shooting Zone: YES Ny [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious urface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Re.,j4 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES N(y MRL YES N.O. Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No/ [ ] Parking Spaces Re wired NO Other 1 Building Height: UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface cover percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 1 Rural Residential: 25% Rural Indu : Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: IA (R RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,0 0 SF M:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject t_,septic&water constraints/None specified [ J Setbacks: Front: 3 () Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: ( O r LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: t t9'AU (,V (- ,{ C2 '3 j!Y Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES 1 EXEMP [ ] Flood Certificate: A k- [ J Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): y/S Violations: Yes N.% [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivi ion:,1ja,/1, 0 i �`g b� Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: I 1 0 < <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES 1•91,Or submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agree „bah. N9rsubmitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted kW NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES 15SY [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 976200106 1.) WSRC Coaching- SPAAD 8/30/13 Other Associated CASES status issued finaled description 976200106 MLA09-00411 PRJ09-00211 P SPAAD ZON09-00135 A 3/31/2010 SPAAD: Site Plan Approval Advance Determination for residential development RAP09-00075 I 4/7/2010 RAP&911 -East Marrowstone Rd MLA13-00135 ZON13-00046 P SPAAD