Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP2010-00015 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER JEFFERSON COUNTY REPORT AND DECISION CASE NO.: Shoreline Substantial Development for a Secondary Use Application MLA10-00155/5DP10-00015 OWNER: Yoko Adachi 19223-34th Avenue South SeaTac, WA 98188 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Shoreline substantial development permit for slope stabilization work previously completed pursuant to two emergency exemptions to provide long-term protection for an existing house near a steep slope abutting Dabob Bay. The site is located at 1253 Deer Creek Road, Quilcene. SUMMARY OF DECISION: Request granted, subject to conditions. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Jefferson County Department of Community Development Staff Report and examining available information on file with the application, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the request as follows: The hearing was opened on October 23, 2012, at 2:05 p.m. Parties wishing to testify were sworn in by the Examiner. The following exhibits were submitted and made a part of the record as follows: SEE ATTACHED INDEX LIST DONNA FROSTHOLM appeared, presented the Department of Community Development Staff Report, and testified that the applicant submitted a completed application on April 21, 2010. During review of the application the applicant's geotechnical engineer submitted a letter stating that they needed to stabilize the site as soon as possible. The Department of Community Development then issued an exemption for the stabilization work. The 1— • • geotechnical engineer subsequently determined that the project also required a bulkhead and the County once again issued an exemption. The present application for a shoreline substantial development permit covers both exemptions. The County provided notice for both exemptions as well as for the present public hearing to consider the permit. The County received no comments from agencies or the public following notice of either the exemption or the public hearing. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions at the end of the Staff Report. She then introduced Exhibits 47-49 (emails) into the record. JENNIFER ROTSTEN appeared and testified that she had reviewed the entire Staff Report to include all recommended conditions. She has no concerns or questions and they will comply with all requirements. She preformed a site visit on July 12th and found that all plantings are doing well. All are holding up and the woody debris is still there. AMY LEITMAN appeared and testified that a previous owner had logged the parcel 40 years ago, and that said activity eventually rendered the steep shoreline bluff unstable. The bluff is now more stable than ever following the work in September, 2011. JOHN PETERSON, geotechnical engineer, appeared and testified that the repair is a reasonable environmental repair that allows a walk-away solution. The replanting and repair in the slide trough represents a huge improvement in erosion protection and naturalization of the site. The repair occurred over a small footprint. No one spoke further in this matter and the Examiner took the matter under advisement. The hearing was concluded at 2:20 p.m. NOTE: A complete record of this hearing is available in the office of Jefferson County Department of Community Development. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION: FINDINGS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement. 2. The Jefferson County Responsible Official considered this application pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) and issued a threshold Determination of Nonsignificance on September 18, 2012. No appeals were filed. 3. Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: • Notice of Type III Application: May 11, 2011(Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: July 11, 2012 (Exhibit 37) 2— • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 10, 2012 (Exhibit 45) Notice was posted on the property: • Notice of Type III Application: May 9, 2011 (Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEP Determination: July 10, 2012 (Exhibit 37) • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 9, 2012 (Exhibit 45) The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: • Notice of Type III Application: May 10, 2010 (Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: July 10, 2012 (Exhibit 37) • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 9, 2012 (Exhibit 45) 4. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a seven acre parcel of waterfront property located on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula and abutting Dabob Bay in unincorporated Jefferson County. The parcel slopes downward from Deer Creek Road to the shoreline at an average slope of approximately 40 percent. A 100 percent slope bluff approximately 80 feet in vertical height separates the upland portion of the parcel from the shoreline. 5. Improvements on the site include a single-family residential dwelling, detached garage, and private well/pump house, all within the jurisdiction of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP). 6. In the winter of 2007/2008 a landslide occurred on the parcel in close proximity to the single-family dwelling and driveway and approximately 80 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The slide occurred to the north of the house at and above the steepest part of the slope at an elevation of approximately 120 feet. 7. The applicant submitted an application for a shoreline substantial development permit to Jefferson County on April 21, 2010, and that became complete on May 19, 2010. The applicant needed the permit to conduct remediation activities on the site to stabilize the slide area and prevent further sliding from occurring. 8. The applicant's geotechnical engineer supervising the repair work submitted a letter to the Department of Community Development (DCD) advising that remediation needed to occur immediately as the parcel was at great risk for additional sliding. In response DCD issued a shoreline emergency exemption to allow slope stabilization work that included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the 3— • • slope. Geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope, and logs and root wads were salvaged and installed along the toe of the reinforced area. The applicant then revegetated the access area. 9. Following completion of the work the supervising engineer submitted a second letter to DCD advising of the immediate need for a bulkhead at the toe of the slope for stabilization. DCD issued a second emergency shoreline exemption that allowed installation of a 40 foot long, rock bulkhead. The geotechnical engineer had noted on a July 5, 2011, site visit that the ordinary high water mark had moved ten to 13 feet landward from the point where it was previously identified. The applicant's present request for a shoreline substantial development permit covers both remedial actions. 10. The Findings and Conclusions set forth on Pages 3-8 of the DCD Staff Report are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented by this request. 2. The applicant has established that a request for a shoreline substantial development permit to allow previous slope stabilization and bulkhead work at a site located at 1253 Deer Creek Road, Quilcene, is consistent with all criteria set forth in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the SMMP, and the Jefferson County Code and therefore should be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall apply for a building permit for slope stabilization work. 2. The project shall be installed and maintained per the approved plan sheets by Aspect (Exhibit 2, 15, and 24). 3. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) requirements (if Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issues a HPA). 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Margie Schirato with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at 360-427-2179 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements (if Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issues a HPA). 5. Any damage to the proposed structure shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. Any damage that interferes with natural shoreline functions shall be repaired as soon as practicable. 6. The applicant shall implement the approved GASP. 4— • DECISION: The request for a shoreline substantial development permit to allow the already completed remediation and stabilization work previously authorized by emergency exemption at a site located at 1253 Deer Creek Road, Quilcene, is hereby granted subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. ORDERED this 6th day of November, 2012. S PH K. CAUSSE , JR. Hearing Examiner 5— • Adachi SSDP for Slope Stabilization 0 EXHIBIT LIST Item No Item/description 1 Date Type 11Pre-application 112/2-12/15/2009 1A 21Shoreline application 4/21/20101A 31 Letters-Application Complete and Additional Information 6/14/20101G 41 Email from representative 7/26/2010'G 51 Emails from/to project biologists _ 8/26/20101G 6';Emails from/to representative 9/7/20101G 71 Emails from/to project biologists 9/7/20101G 8 Project proposal with site visit notes 10/5/20101G 91 Emails from/to project biologists 10/18/2012;G 10 Email from/to project biologists 11/22/2010'G 11 i Emails from/to representative 1/18/2011;G 121Additional information submittal __I 1/27/20111A 13Critical Areas Stewardship Plan 1/31/20111A 141 Emails from/to representative ! 2/14/2011;G 15 Email with letter from geotechnical engineer 3/10/2011'A 161 Emails from/to representative 3/15/20111G 171Emails from/to representative 3/16/20111G 18 Emails from/to WDFW 3/17/2011 I G 19!Emails from/to representative 3/23/2011 G 201 Emails from/to representative ! 5/5/2011 G 21 Notice of application 5/10/2011 1 N 221Affidavit of posting -notice of application 1 5/12/2011IN 23,Emails from/to representative 7/12/2011 G 24LEmail with letter from geotechnical engineer _ I 7/14/2011 A 25'i,Emails from/to representative 7/14/2011'G 261 Email with photos from representative 9/6/20111 G 27 Email to representative _ 9/6/2011 G 281 Email from representative 9/7/2011 G 29!Email with as built from representative 11/3/20111G 301 Emails from/to representative 11/3/20111G 31 Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum 1/31/2012G 321 Email from representative 6/18/20121G 331 Email from representative 6/22/2012 G 34iEmail with revised JARPA and Environmental Checklist 7/2/201211A 35',Emails from/to representative 7/5/20121G _ 361 Current county real property printout I 7/5/20121G 37',Notice of application ' 7/10/2012,N, S 381 Affidavit of posting -notice of application _ 7/16/20121N, S 39'Final DNS for SEPA 9/18/20121S 40'1 Email SEPA Final to DNR, DoE, &WDFW ! 9/18/20121S 41!Email to representative 9/18/2012 S 421 Emails from/to representative 9/20/20121G 431 Email to representative _ 10/8/20121,G 441Affidavit of posting -notice of public hearing 10/9/2012G 451 Notice of public hearing .__ 10/9/20121G 461 Staff Report 1 10/12/2012 R 471 481 49, Key to Types A=Application L=Maps C=Comments N=Notices G=General R=Reports S=SEPA H:\exhibit list adachi 102312 1 of 1 • • ' IN u nW BULKHEAD BUILDERS uu November 30, 21 t- LOG ITEM Jefferson County Department of Community Development Attn: Colleen Zmolek 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms. Zmolek, Attached please find the pre-application conference request and required fee for the Adachi Slide Repair Job we have spoken about. Please review and let me know if anything else is needed to set the meeting date and go over the project further. We had discussed completing the pre-application meeting on site. Once you have had a chance to officially review this,please confirm the ability to meet on site and the available dates and times so we can schedule with the geo-tech and owner as well. Thank you in advance for your timely reply. Best retards, Je 'er Rotsten Officer,Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. DEC (360)297-2401 sealevelbb@silverlink.net P.O. Box 375, Kingston, Washington 98346 • (360) 297-2401 • Fax (360) 297-2308 I 0 0 4 4' lkiii14 1.$01S1 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4,, 'o' 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 C _ /`STN il 360/379-4450.800/831-2678 . 360/379-4451 Fax Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type III project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subse ffhive review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applica rRta (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. NAME: € -- .. J-t CA-C.f"tz MAILING ADDRESS: `CI 2-Z 3 3L1 ,{_ S . S , L J 'V(V -231 3 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 2-O(o- T23-1 --3.A-3("--1 (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: ,..01Aj, UL._ ' U si �.. . _'_-s•,i� .0 C MAILING ADDRESS: et) ix 3%t''S 4K1�.)ex%1( ) kA. ct'a Ito TELEPHONE: (HOME) (WORK) 240-Z ,q-- 2-1-1`J j DIRECTIONS 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity,showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; d. Means of ingress and egress; e. Property/lot drainage; f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; g. Location of utility easements;and h. Proposed location of buildings,including setbacks to property boundaries. 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 1 AspectconsuLting earth +water LOG ITEM # 1 Page-1--_of �I 1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Landslide Remediation - Adachi Property 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Seiichi Adachi Project No. 080029-001-02 • October 27, 2008 DEC - 2 ,r �, __ ., __ sr,=..-.. .....,. z... .,a. >_.....,.'`., :�,.aa#�.�kP..�l.,✓�..��.m�_r_fir.,��s,x �s v'.�._ .�. a.,.. ... ..,w.'g......a. ,._�.�<...::., .. ,> ,.�..> M tw...,F.,� e.�,m.,_.x.e�n",�:': '3' p I s •t , ' La.,r,J , G CV i 5 1 \ ,\ C C - ° \ �g N \' ' '.. RJ_ •. \ a ,\ . �z. Ca Al 1 t3 ■ �`'u J Pi‘∎ d •Cab of ... \ . ✓x .10 \• �af-ar Z ` a m � LQ }ITEM O 1 t+. ` ,o Page �' f:'. 9 X11 m 1_. I 0 2- 1 1 .e E Q .� O P.-- CL u). w °'` a / ---", _..': i w 'i { Y /© _ . 1 Q 1 , tl . ° - 3 ( . ; .z __ J i j� ( ! © ♦ , ' -�.i , ice .■ r A. r ♦�> , .,y, \ • \ `,=. \ 1 111 )((O -\\ . N\?� ,Nc" ti C\ f \ % x\; ..X\,.'-''S \„)c;..x 5 ,; 2 ;. arm $-.cwt Q SOc ›, `S`t-�- a,. � ,, ,.m °� O as i �� -7...... '' ;, ,,... \ • . 40-4A -O .. ■ \ -..7s - ------ • • As ectconsult ng earth+water • DEC - 2 2 ; LOG ITEM Page /12 of (( ( GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Landslide Remediation - Adachi Property 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Seiichi Adachi Project No. 080029-001-02 • October 27, 2008 Aspect Consulting,LLC atli • r Jr' I 1\ UPS . 0,, �8�1 � ` i9 2/Oq • +1.a ' �`S1ON LA 04C$AL Todd S.Parkington,PE John L.Peterson,PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer tparkington @aspectconsulting.com jeterson@aspectconsulting.com W:1 GEOTECH1080029 Adachl Landslide\Deliverables\Geotechnlcal Investigation Reportdoc • 179 Madrone Lane North Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 Tel:(206)780-9370 Fax:(206)780-9438 www.aspectconsulting.com a limited liability company • • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM Contents Page 7 of u 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Site Location 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Site Investigation 1 2.1 Site Description 1 2.2 Geologic Setting 2 2.3 Subsurface Exploration 2 2.3.1 Soil 3 2.3.2 Laboratory Testing 3 2.3.3 Groundwater 3 2.3.4 Seismic Information 3 3 Conclusions and Recommendations 5 3.1 Slope Stability 5 3.1.1 Slope Stability Back Analysis 5 3.1.2 Slope Mitigation 6 3.2 Soldier Pile Design 7 3.3 Lateral Earth Pressures 8 Limitations g List of Figures 1 Site Location Map 2 Site and Boring Location Plan List of Appendices A Boring Logs B Laboratory Test Results C Slope Stability Analyses PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM # r 1 Introduction Page of f[ 1_ Aspect Consulting,LLC was retained by Mr. Seiichi Adachi to conduct a geotechnical engineering investigation related to a landslide that occurred on 1253 Deer Creek Road located east of Dabob Bay on the Toandos Peninsula in Jefferson County,Washington. The tax parcel identification number for this parcel is 601032020. 1.1 Site Location The site consists of a single parcel located at the west end of Deer Creek Road. Based on the United States Geologic Survey(USGS), 7.5-minute Quilcene,Washington topographic quadrangle map,the property is located in Jefferson County in Section 3, Township 26 North,Range 1 West,W.M. and at Longitude 122.790 degrees W and Latitude 47.778 degrees N. The location of the site is presented on Figure 1,Site Location Map. 1.2 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential remediation methods for a landslide that occurred on the site the winter of 2007 to 2008. The landslide removed part of the access driveway for the existing house on the site.Remediation of the landslide would be performed to reduce the risk of further damage to the access driveway and possibly to restore the driveway in its original location. Our study included review of available geologic literature,drilling three borings to evaluate the engineering properties of the site soils,analyzing the stability of the slope using the soil information developed for this report and topography provided by Mr. Adachi,and providing general discussions regarding mitigating the risk of future slope movement and possibly repairing a portion of the site impacted by the landslide.This report presents the results of our investigation. The investigation was conducted in general accordance with our scope of work proposal,dated February 13,2008,and Contract Change Order 1,dated July 2,2008. 2 Site Investigation 2.1 Site Description The site is located on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula overlooking Dabob Bay. The parcel on which the residence is located is just under 7 acres in area. The site slopes down to the west,with the steepest portion of the slope below the house and driveway. The steepest portion of the slope is approximately 100 percent and 80 feet high above the shoreline.Above this,the slope grade gentles to about 40 percent. The slope continues up PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 1 S S LOG ITEM ASPECT CONSULTING Page ? ofd to the east beyond the property. The residence sits at the top of the steeper portion of the slope. The access driveway winds across the site from the southeast,curves north of the residence and approaches the residence from the northeast. The slide occurred to the north of the house at and above the steepest part of the slope. The maximum elevation of the slide is at about elevation 120,which is about 40 feet higher than the top of the steepest portion of the slope.A portion of the upper part of the slide extended into the access driveway. The resulting slide scarp at the head of the slide is approximately 10 feet high and between vertical and 111:1 V(Horizontal:Vertical)in steepness. The location of our borings and the topography are shown on Figure 2,Site and Boring Location Plan. 2.2 Geologic Setting The Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources(WDGER),Geologic Map of Washington—Northwest Quadrant,dated 2002,indicates that the site is underlain by Deposits of pre-Fraser Age,Undifferentiated(Qgpc). These deposits are described as clay, silt, sand,gravel,till and peat,generally moderately to deeply weathered and compact. 2.3 Subsurface Exploration Three borings(B-1 through B-3)were drilled on the site on March 19,2008 and samples were obtained to aid in the determination of engineering properties of the subsurface materials. The test borings were located on the site as shown on Figure 2. Boring locations were estimated in the field by measuring from existing site features. The borings went to a maximum depth of 41.5 feet below the ground surface using a track- mounted limited access hollow stem auger drill rig. Split spoon(1 3/8-inch inner- diameter) samples were obtained from the borings in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test Procedures(American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM]D 1586), at 5-foot intervals. The split spoon sampler is driven 18 inches into the soil by a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler are counted for each 6 inches of penetration. The blow count for the first 6 inches of penetration is discarded,and the remaining blow counts are summed to produce the Standard Penetration Resistance(N). Geologic Drill drilled the borings under the direction of Aspect Consulting,LLC. Logs of the borings indicating the type of soils encountered are presented in Appendix A. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between soil types. Changes logged between sample intervals in our borings were interpreted. Soils were classified in general accordance with the ASTM D-2488, "Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils(Visual and Manual Procedure)". In addition to the borings performed for this investigation,information gathered at the site for construction of the existing house was used to enhance our understanding of the site soils. This information is contained in a report prepared by Shannon&Wilson, Inc. 2 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02• OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT CONSULTING LO for Mr. Sei Adachi,titled Geotechnical Report,Adachi Property on Toandosien insuuiaa, ITEM, dated September, 1998. Page O of 2.3.1 Soil In general,subsurface conditions on the slope consisted of sand or silty sand overlying silts and clays.The relative density of the sand encountered in the borings drilled within the landslide area was loose. The consistency of the silt and clay was generally hard.The soil descriptions in the Shannon&Wilson report were similar. However,the apparently in-place upper sands described in that report had relative density ranging from loose to medium dense. 2.3.2 Laboratory Testing To aid in classifying the soils and to estimate general soil characteristics, laboratory tests were performed on selected representative samples. The following tests were performed: grain size distribution(ASTM D422),Atterberg limits(ASTM D4318)and moisture content(ASTM D2216).Analytical Resources,Inc. in Tukwila,Washington was retained to provide geotechnical laboratory analysis.The results of the laboratory testing are presented on the boring logs and in Appendix B. 2.3.3 Groundwater Groundwater was not noted in the borings prepared for this report. However,there was water flowing out of the slope in the area of the slide and the moisture content laboratory tests indicate that the upper sands have high moisture contents and are likely saturated. The saturation appears to extend into the silts and clays for some distance. The relatively low permeability of the silts and clays would tend to mask the presence of groundwater during drilling. Groundwater was encountered in the borings performed for the referenced Shannon&Wilson report.This report indicated perched groundwater in the sand over the hard clay.Water table elevations fluctuate with time,being dependent on seasonal precipitation,irrigation,land use,and climatic conditions,as well as other factors. Therefore,water level observations at the time of the field investigation may vary from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. 2.3.4 Seismic Information Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code(IBC)is used to classify soils and rock into categories for use in seismic design of structures. One of the criteria by which soil can be classified using the table is the average Standard Penetration Resistance (N-value)within the top 100 feet of soil. Site specific data were not developed to a depth of 100 feet. However,N-values do not typically decrease with depth. Using the final blow count in our borings as representative of the soil beneath the borings,the average blow count for the upper 100 feet of soil ranges from 33 to 50.Therefore,for seismic design of structures,the site should be considered Class D,"stiff soil",as defined in the IBC. Chapter 16 of the IBC provides equations for converting the mapped earthquake spectral response to the design spectral response.The mapped earthquake spectral response accelerations for short periods(SS)and for 1-second periods(SI)were obtained for the PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 3 • • ASPECT CONSULTING site from the United States Geologic Survey's National Seismic Hazards Mapping Project website using the latitude and longitude given in Section 1.1,above. Ss at the site is 1.21g and SI is 0.44g. Site coefficients for this site are Fa= 1.1,F„= 1.6. The design earthquake spectral response accelerations adjusted for site class effects are Sas=0.89g, Sal =0.47g. As indicated in Chapter 18 of the IBC,a design peak ground acceleration(PGA)for the site may be estimated from the Sds by dividing Sds by 2.5 which results in 0.36g. LOG ITEM Page ,► of it 4 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM t 3 Conclusions and Recommendations Page 12,- of 11 3.1 Slope Stability Aspect Consulting,LLC performed a slope stability analysis on a cross section drawn through the slope. The analysis was conducted using the commercially available software Slide 4.0 by Rocscience. A groundwater table was assumed to be present in the slope at shallow depth. Soil strength parameters were estimated from the results of the subsurface investigation combined with a back analysis of topography present before the slide and an assumed safety factor of just under 1.0. The pseudostatic method was used for our slope stability analysis to estimate the safety factor under seismic conditions. The seismic coefficient used in a pseudostatic analysis is typically taken to be about'A of the PGA that the site is estimated to experience during the design earthquake.For this project,we used a seismic coefficient of 0.18g. The results of slope stability analyses are expressed as factors of safety against displacement failure.The factor of safety is the ratio of resisting forces to driving forces. A factor of safety of 1.0 is equilibrium; a factor of safety of less than 1.0 indicates failure. Typically, a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 for static conditions and 1.0 for seismic (pseudostatic)conditions is considered adequate.The lower minimum safety factor for seismic conditions is adequate as the probability of occurrence of the seismic conditions analyzed is relatively low. Based on our observations at the site,the head of the slide or slide scarp does not appear to be very stable. Portions of the scarp are vertical or near vertical with water flowing from the base of the scarp in at least one location. The scarp appears to be 8 to 12 feet high.As the steepness of the scarp appears to be greater than other slopes in the upper sand in this area,we anticipate that over time, if no remediation is performed,the scam will slough to a shallower angle. The approximate location of the slide scarp on the south (residence)side of the slide is indicated on Figure 2. 3.1.1 Slope Stability Back Analysis Our first slope stability analysis for the project was performed using topography available from a survey done for the site prior to construction of the existing house.This topography was developed by Clark Land Office in 1998.Using this topography,we varied the soil parameters of the loose sand layer until a safety factor of about 1 was obtained for a slip surface similar in location and shape to the slide was achieved. We also used topography developed by Main-Line Surveying earlier this year to analyze the slope in its current state. We again varied the soil parameters of the loose sand layer until a safety factor slightly greater than 1 was obtained. This would represent the minimum possible for the slope to be holding in its current configuration. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 5 • • ASPECT CONSULTING Based on these analyses,we used an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees and a cohesion of 100 pounds per square foot(psf)for the loose sand layer. Graphical representations of our analysis are presented in Appendix C. LOG ITEM 3.1.2 Slope Mitigation Slope mitigation refers to any method used to increase the stability of a slope or any ------ method used to reduce the risk of damage to people or property from slope movement. Methods used to increase the stability of the slope could include regrading the slope to a shallower angle,placement of a soil buttress at the toe of the slope,removal of soil from the top of the slope, or construction of shoring walls on the slope. Methods to reduce the risk of damage to people or property from slope movement include locating structures away from unstable slopes or constructing barriers to limit soil movements toward structures. For purposes of this study we have focused on methods to increase the stability of the slope,as the existing house is already present and there is little available space to move the access driveway. The limitations of space on the site make regrading the slope or removing soil from the top of the slope infeasible.As the potentially unstable portion of the slope is in the loose sand,with a steeper hard clay slope below it, a toe buttress would likely not be workable. Therefore,construction of a shoring wall of some type appears to be the most feasible option for increasing the stability of the slope. We considered the merits of several types of walls as a remediation for the landslide including mechanically reinforced earth(MRE)walls,gravity walls(concrete or concrete block), soldier pile walls and soil nail walls. MRE walls consist of compacted soil reinforced with plastic geogrid. Gravity walls are reinforced concrete, or concrete, masonry, or gabion blocks. Soldier pile walls consist of steel beams placed vertically in drilled holes backfilled with concrete. Wood or concrete lagging is placed in the space between adjacent soldier piles. Soil nails are steel pins placed in holes drilled at an angle into the slope with the holes backfilled with cement grout. Any wall can be subject to a failure that results from movement of the soil beneath the wall.Therefore,for remediation of this slide,any wall must extend through the loose sand to or into the hard clay soil beneath. From the borings drilled for this report and for the Shannon&Wilson report,we anticipate that up to 30 feet of loose sand may be present.A 30-foot deep excavation for construction of either a gravity wall or an MRE wall would likely be prohibitively expensive. Soil nails work by increasing the total strength of the potentially unstable soil. We anticipate that several rows of nails would need to be installed to sufficiently increase the soil strength. This would require equipment moving on the steep face of the slope where the landslide occurred.We anticipate that the installation requirements for this site and the number of soil nails needed would make this option more expensive than a soldier pile wall. Installation of a soldier pile wall requires relatively large drill equipment to excavate the holes and install the piles. However,the incremental cost of increasing the lengths of the piles to reach a bearing layer such as the hard clay is generally not prohibitive. Further, the piles can be installed in such a way as to allow backfill soil to be placed to re- 6 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT coht. Gl TEM establish the access drive in its pre-slide condition. Soldier pile walls that have" fr?9e___( _ . Of exposed height of greater than 10 to 12 feet are typically reinforced by adding a row or rows of tiebacks.A tieback is a hole drilled from the face of the slope at a near horizontal angle.A steel cable is placed in the hole and the hole is filled with cement grout.The cable is then attached to the soldier pile to increase its load capacity for retained soil. One further possible option for the project is to not attempt any remediation of the landslide.The access driveway has been moved to the south away from the landslide at this time,and no other structures were directly affected by the slide.The primary disadvantage to this option is that the post landslide topography does not appear to be very stable as discussed in the slope stability section above.We understand that some of the utilities for the residence are within a few feet of the top of the slide scarp. The access driveway has been moved essentially as far to the south as is reasonably possible for the site.For these reasons,any further movement of the landslide towards the structures is likely to damage utilities and possibly cut vehicle access to the residence. 3.2 Soldier Pile Design Using the results of our slope stability back analysis described above,we analyzed the slope with soldier piles in place. Based on this analysis,each soldier pile must extend through the loose sand into the hard clay and be capable of withstanding a shear force of 33.3 kips per linear foot of spacing between center of piles(200 kips for a 6-foot spacing). The pile must be capable of withstanding this force at any location within the loose sand layer.In addition,the wall must be designed to withstand the lateral earth forces as discussed in Section 3.3 below.Note that the shear force that the pile needs to resist at depth includes the lateral rotational earth forces; i.e.,the pile must be able to resist lateral earth forces of the exposed wall section and the shear force of the lower earth movement,but not both simultaneously. For design of the piles,the following soil parameters may be used: Angle of Internal Soil Type Unit Weight(pcf) Friction Cohesion(psf) Sandy Backfill 120 35 0 Loose Sand 120 30 100 Hard Clay 120 0 4000 For a pile designed to withstand the force given above,the safety factor against slope movement for the slope increase to about 1.5 under static conditions. 1.5 is generally considered an adequate safety factor for static slope stability. For a pile designed as above,the slope will have a safety factor equal to or greater than one for seismic(pseudo- static)conditions with a horizontal seismic coefficient of up to 0.19. This corresponds to a design peak ground acceleration of between 0.29 and 0.38. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 7 • • ASPECT CONSULTING # LOG ITEM r 3.3 Lateral Earth Pressures Page1`�f- L Lateral pressures are exerted on below grade basement and retaining walls by backfill soils, surcharge loads,and hydrostatic pressures caused by groundwater. Lateral earth pressures on walls depend upon the type of wall,type of backfill material and allowable wall movements. For a free standing soldier pile wall that is free to rotate away from the retained soil,lateral earth pressures should be estimated for an"active"condition.For walls that are compressing the retained soil,lateral earth pressures should be estimated for a"passive"condition. For the proposed case of a free-standing soldier pile wall with backfill placed above the wall,the active earth pressure coefficient(Ka)will be 0.27 and the equivalent fluid unit weight will be 33 pounds per cubic foot(pcf). This assumes an angle of internal friction of 35 degrees and a unit weight of 120 pcf for the backfill and no slope above the wall. For the loose sand below the exposed portion of the wall,the passive earth pressure coefficient(Kr)will be 0.56 and the equivalent fluid unit weight will be 67 pcf.This assumes an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees,a unit weight of 120 pcf and a 2H:1V slope below the wall.A passive pressure of 2,000 pcf may be used for the hard clay encountered below the sands. Note that as the below grade portion of the wall consists of piles without lagging,the passive pressure acts over a distance equal to 2.5 times the pile diameter; i.e.,if the pile spacing is greater than 2.5 times the pile diameter,the passive pressure exerted by the soil in front of the wall will be less than the maximum possible. The recommended equivalent fluid unit weights do not include hydrostatic pressure due to groundwater accumulated behind walls, seismic loading,or any surcharge due to nearby loading from structures,equipment or traffic. The"passive"pressure was reduced by a factor of 2 to limit wall translation. Note that if the wall design includes the passive pressure provided by the loose sand downslope from the wall location, it is possible that a future landslide occurring entirely downslope of the wall may cause damage to the wall. This potential damage could be mitigated by ignoring the passive pressure provided from the loose sand. This would likely require the addition of tiebacks to the soldier piles.Alternatively,the wall could be retrofitted with tiebacks after the occurrence of such a landslide. Some movement at the top of the wall would likely occur as the soldier piles bend in response to the loss of passive pressure. In our opinion,the most reasonable alternative is to use the loose sand passive pressure,while allowing for the future installation of tiebacks should a lower slope slide occur. The potential seismic force on the wall can be modeled as a uniform pressure on the back of the wall equal to 11 times the exposed height of the wall(in feet). The units for this pressure are pounds per square foot(psf). Weep holes or some other provision for water to flow out from behind the wall should be installed at the base of the wall to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the structure. Based on the presence of water flowing out of the slope after the slide, provisions for collecting and safely draining any water from the weep hole areas should be made to avoid erosion occurring on the slope below the wall. 8 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 A • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM # I Limitations Page )(� of )II Work for this project was performed and this report prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the nature and conditions of work completed in the same or similar localities,at the time the work was performed. It is intended for the exclusive use of Mr. Seiichi Adachi for specific application to the referenced property. This report does not represent a legal opinion.No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the geologic reconnaissance and three borings completed for this project.Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground,extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary.Please note that differing subsurface conditions may be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction.If variations are observed at that time,it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 9 r f -_. ltl rrt f + " �'rtt l+ r x` w Sx Si ;R,�s, � ' >I l �� S f1 3' • It t ~24r. t '� \! 'j,_y .&` .' rJ v'"r4 '� a" ` I C r i!= 7 r _ , >.-V F" J':P • f t \ ".2\` 'q t •^ ,,,, t. 3! f j.. _..rte .. �5� • tASEY+••+."'R�.x ( a � 3 Eke �J ° s i a� F♦ a !�' i�t r'r ' _ �7` r ,, -s j`, -�' ,4-5,,_.---1 3` a.. ' ,,,,,Z.�+ ,. ,: I�, a¢�' i �F < ., `` - r � *. � `�^+ i t-'�., #: f C f :'e b+.,Jii4U]i----°' '41 il f r� r'i � .f'a r t t _ r �y "`, Y Ij�'1, �y � ti r � �< t r � .. 6 < � �� �� ,>�°i -'1:7''''-'"):- :',,fit, z 3 i (i �` i viii -era° a k 4�r,- � �� "i/ "e F�} E t t r 3i�y_ ��� �� 'ti 1:\.tR ,,,,,,,l_Ati.7,. : , 1 t t ',G �l,- �y .s $Z pY-7.04, i', t .; �. _ i 1� - ""i r`h i !f J -f,p e..r` t',ysli }k ¢ 38 .r,t li + 6 r �¢E�' �,/.' ': �` fo Cam. y ` .� 7""'� �, ' t J3 t ' ti =,rR }' Site Location ' i t „� _ •• !. r ,; � Fw' Ta !z of 4°�' s '1' r , o JJ a.•, N S a, a° �a �. ;t 'Q 7 i ,,,,4"" 1 1 ! - ,, e-"y i -.. , y. 's �tI ai r sZ.ii : it i _, 'Q • _� ` 4 Ifs,; a/ ' . i � ',;,..t.:;?-77.,.i. 4 y { r dJ r ,�,.�.i / 9 Y i '-- w�. itu r 2#' S Or Camp ° 7 "ea . � i +; c � � �� -k• .: brc,a n i i FS`t- 15 Z�# } rte r e N Tabook P! ark � J ,. ,R ' °( O p i � E E - ,.,, aka ,,,,,,,,,,,,:-.-,,.,.,;:5 f'ifJ I 'y F r t 4 R F } J 1 J / 0 t a 06 2004 .u. /' ,-.F. / 's 'a" ;r7,,,.ti e m Belt 1 Y ' _! l ,. :16-, '"� ,jy Site Location Map �October2008 PROJECTNO. W ;Aspectconsulting ��, a a,: o earth+water TSP 080029 wwwaspectconsulting,com Adachi Landslide w« 'Ma FIGURE Na ~O 1 °' alimited liaDilMy company Toandos Peninsula,Jefferson County,Washington �W.�e d 6^VZOSZOOSOW0-0002.POP.1.f.PV 6Z009014.1...0 g r g ae - 2 tiotN c n m F8, G ITEM ,8i iii e 4 at \ U o Q =�� Page I of i W I 0V 3 o o al s z m a • w e(ti _ Rr L ti�ZZ a tf. t,Z 2 ,jN�i1 �., ry ,._w o ceCe'nES'.2-- >- i-- i I ai iy 0 6•_ 1 d _ 0 0 v Q - x E Q O 8 , CL U- 1.----1 a° \ •- O z !.a �- a r-i !A:.fit vi?_"+ Iuu, ^ _ o L \ g, - w --.31 Z iz- F_ r, az >- 3=. g ' . W � , o o ¢ 1 : E z , ' • 8 ,\ ✓ 5 a uz aom� xR g a° o§ mga . � li\ 0 < ,T_ 1 tn _.+_ it.. lio, i 4:: \ S \`? o i.,, ! J W � j I �, .. — = aid f . , r c i A 14,1 ..../j -..„, li 3- ae s ■ t O 4,./// a �� \ ! i t: • — '., , I a h / _ F �/ Y .ywr..h £ I 8: rcE ■ • • LOG ITEM # �'a9eiof1 APPENDIX A Boring Logs • • 0'.0 Well-graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency C v 0.0. GW gravel with sand,little to Density SPT(2)blows/foot t@ 1' ,0.0 no fines Very Loose 0 to 4 Coarse- ; a LL © �o°JO- Loose 4 to 10 > m aa) 0°0°0 Poorly graded gravel Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 n v co va°C°o° and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 Test Symbols to ,� o°°°° GP g °o 1° d 00000 little to no fines Very Dense >50 G=Grain Size N o Z c'.:3°0° M=Moisture Content ° ° c 0i Silty gravel and silty Consistency SPTt2iblows/foot A=Atterberg Limits Z Very Soft 0 to 2 C=Chemical `o r a ^E GM gravel with sand Fine- ry ° • • ' Soft 2 to 4 DD=Dry Density m o-° iu Grained Soils Medium Stiff 4 to 8 LOGrr t /M o a LL s r, r Stiff 8 to 15 ' �- 'V! 13 0). a,A1.A Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 J r�t4l;1 GC clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 (� U f� Component Defil itg1P _..,_Of CO C `o_ Well-graded sand and Descriptive Term Size Range and Sieve Number ° .0 i sw sand with gravel,little Boulders Larger than 12" o ti a) to no fines Cobbles 3"to 12" ° b- Gravel 3"to No.4(4.75 mm) 19 m a) Poorly-graded sand Coarse Gravel 3"to 3/4" CO° C)N `� Sp and sand with gravel, Fine Gravel 3/4"to No.4(4.75 mm) aa) o little to no fines Sand No.4(4.75 mm)to No.200(0.075 mm) c d .@ o z Coarse Sand No.4(4.75 mm)to No.10(2.00 mm) o N Silty sand and Medium Sand No.10(2.00 mm)to No.40(0.425 mm) E y N SM silty sand with Fine Sand No.40(0.425 mm)to No.200(0.075 mm) 0 o a r gravel Silt and Clay Smaller than No.200(0.075 mm) In 0 o LL (ev0)00Clayey sand and (3)Estimated Percentage Moisture Content c SC clayey sand with gravel Dry Absence of moisture, co Percentage by Weight Modifier dusty,dry to the touch Silt,sandy silt,gravelly silt, <5 Trace Slightly Moist-Perceptible ° ML silt with sand or gravel moisture o > ,0 5 to 15 Slightly(sandy,silty, Moist-Damp but no visible cn u) m clayey,gravelly) water 0 m w 15 to 30 Sandy,silty,clayey, Very Moist-Water visible but Clay of low to medium Y tY. c°v (J 2 gravelly) not free draining o CL plasticity;silty,sandy,or Z m=' gravelly clay,lean clay 30 to 49 Very(sandy,silty, Wet-Visible free water,usually Co w J / clayey,gravelly) from below water table a 3 __ Organic clay or silt of low Symbols grout oL plasticity Blows/6"or , surface seal o —— Sampler portion of 6" Type Bentonite ° Elastic silt,clayey silt,silt 2.0"OD ,a Sampler Type chips with micaceous or diato- Split-Spoon A p Description Bentonite o MH Sampler ca> seal La o maceous fine sand or silt (SPT) " Continuous Push w T A Filter pack with t0 ° Clay of high plasticity, 3.25"OD Split-Spoon Ring Sampler blank casing y 9 P tY "' section c' / CH sandy or gravelly clay,fat Bulk sample .� Y 9 Y Y 3.0"OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler Screened casing 3 C a E / clay with sand or gravel 0 (including Shelby tube) : or Hydrotip with 7 m w J / r'9 - filter pack Grab Sample u /�/,// Organic clay or silt of o Portion not recovered 1 End cap C CT a iL �/iii OH medium to high Itl Percentage by dry weight I5) Combined USCS symbols used for 0) //�//// plasticity 12) (SPT)Standard Penetration Test fines between 5%and 15%as o ///�. 2 Peat,muck and other (ASTM D-1586) estimated in General Accordance 4m >,.c "^"�= (3) In General Accordance with with Standard Practice for a pT highly organic Soils Standard Practice for Description Description and Identification of w p 'IflohMeor and Identification of Soils(ASTM D-2488) Soils(ASTM D-2488) y (4)Depth of groundwater Q ATD=At time of drilling a X Static water level(date) V m Classifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations,which include density/consistency,moisture condition,grain size,and a plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein.Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification 0 methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. V a °"'E PROJECT NO. c %Aspectconsulting D.C..,Exploration Log Key o earth+water DRA"«a,. Q www.aspectconsulting.com FIGURE Na U REVISE BY A-1 a limited liability company • IllAspectconsutting Boring Log Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 _ B-1 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value • Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ Water Content% Material Description Depth (feet) Type/ID 6" 0 10 20 30 40 5C Type p (ft) ' ,u I)"O; Loose,slightly moist,silty,very sandy GRAVEL o°? (GM),trace organics. 1 p000� — 1 C q 2— O OTC 3— 1 4 Stiff,moist,very sandy SILT(ML),fine sand,4 trace organics. LOG ITEM•6 VV 4— I # p r —4 I 5 , m=24% 5 I Page )4 of-5 / 5 ----1 6— , 7 Grades to ve moist. —6 I 1\ rY 7— \ —7 _ a 8 \' 8 10 C 12 IL Grades to very stiff. —8 9— I —9 I 10— i m=29%, 5 I 1 Grades to wet and stiff. —10 -200=63% 6 • 11— 9 I —11 12— I I 1 —12 5 7 1 13— 1 6 1 —13 14— I I I I —14 15— i m=30°!0 6 I -15 6 I 16— 7 -16 17— 1 I I —17 3 18— i 1 5 -18 0 19— \ —19 N I \\ N \ a 20— I m=34% 11 \ —20 U 19 o \ ° 21— 27 O j Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). 21 w I g 22— I I / —22 o 10 I j g 23— " 18 I 29 / Grades to very moist. —23 I a 24— I ° a / I a I / —24 (0 o I j/ ? Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL c P. ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level w ®Split Spoon S7 Approved by:TSP o Water Level(ATD) w o Figure No. A-2 • • 111111AS eCt consultin Boring Log g Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-1 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value Elevation Borehole Completion sample Tests Blows/ Material (feet) Type/ID Water Content%7E Description Depth 8' 0 10 20 30 40 50 Type (ft) m=24% 9 i 18 1 26— 30 T —26 27— LOG ITEM —27 28— —28 � 1, of--F-J� � 29— Page 1 F-1--- —29 30— _ m=22% 11 30 18 • 31— 18 —31 j 32— Bottom of borehole at 31.5'bgs.Borehole —32 backfilled with bentonite chips. 33— —33 34— —34 35— —35 36— —36 37-,- —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— —42 43— —43 0 44— —44 0 N T.,- 45— —45 2, U ° 46— —46 0 Si g 47— —47 0 z 48- -48 U a cI 49— —49 0 0 J z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL E m ® No Recovery T Static Water Level Approved by:TSP o Split Spoon Water Level(ATD) w 0, Figure No. A-2 • • %AspectCOnSUtting Project Number Boring Log Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 _ B-2 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Sample Tests Blows/ N-value • Material Depth Elevation Borehole Completion Water Content%* Ty Description (feet) Type/ID 6" 0 10 20 30 40 r e (ft) Loose,wet,brown,slightly silty SAND(SP-SM), trace organics,fine sand. 1 — — 1 2— —2 2 LOG ITEM 3— v 2 7 I —3 l�\ 4— — I Page ) ofd —4 1 5— m=35%, 2 I —5 -200=9% 2 l 6— 2 I —6 I 1 —7 7— I 4 I 8- 3 1 —8 2 9— — \\ —9 10— m=26% 13 \ -10 � Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). 20 �r 11— X 25 / Slow drilling. —11 / 12— / —12 8 / —13 13— 15 Grades to very moist. 20 4 i X 14— — 1 —14 15— — o I —15 10 18 1 16— m=28/a 18 I —16 I I —17 17— I 12 I —18 18— 20 20 '' I 00 19— — I —19 o I _ I _ N 20— o 20 n m=_24/0 10 I g 10 1 o 25 T —21 21— 1 o I W _ —22 O• 22 O 1 z I —23 23— I a I —24 a 24— 1 O _ J I z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL E °m ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level = Approved by:TSP F ®Split Spoon Water Level(ATD) 0 o Figure No. A-3 4 ‘AS pectCOnSURing Project Number Boring Log Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-2 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Tests Blows/ N-value • Material Depth Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Type/ID 6" Water Content%* Type Description (ft) 0 10 20 30 40 51 m=26% 13 18 26— — ` 21 —26 LOG ITEM 27— I —27 I # l 28— I p 28 f age of —28 I —29 29— I I 30— I —30 m=23% 10 12 A 31— 18 6"of wet SILT(ML). —31 32— —32 33 Driller indicates gravel layer. 33 34 —34 —35 _ 8 22%= m 35— 13 1 —36 36— 19 37— —37 38 —38 39 —39 _ —40 40— m=26% 13 16 41— 19 • —41 42— Bottom of borehole at 41.5'bgs.Borehole —42 backfilled with bentonite chips. 43— —43 0 44— —44 0 N d 45— —45 a ° ° 46— —46 a' 0 47— —47 J 0 N 5 48— —48 0 49— —49 0 0 z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL 2 ®No Recovery 1 Static Water Level _ Approved by:TSP ®Split Spoon Q Water Level(ATD) o Figure No. A-3 F • • �ASpeCt g Boring Log COnSh+wat Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ Water Content%* Material Description Depth (feet) 6" 0 10 20 30 40 50 Type (ft) Loose,wet,brown,slightly gravelly,very silty SAND(SM),trace organics,trace wood. 1 — — 1 2— —2 FA m=27%, 2 Stiff,wet,dark gray IL�(�l trace 3— -200=99% 2 organics. V V � —3 C 6 4— \ # i —4 5— Page of ALL__— 15 \ Grades to very stiff. 5 13 at 6— , 7 \ —6 7 I \\ Grades to hard. —7 \ 6"of sandy SILT(ML). A 8— 1 14 23 \ —8 9— I -9 10— ' m=24% 13 \ —10 24 50+\ 11— , 30 Trace fine sand. —11 12— I -12 13— I I 14 22 —13 27 /14— I / / Trace fine sand. —14 15— m=24% 14 // —15 23 16— i 26 —16 1 17— I 1 —17 1 18— 1 —18 \\\ 0 19— I —19 N d 20— I L 9 I —20 fi 18 I 0 21— I 26 0 —21 w 1 0 22— I —22 o I 5 I 23- I —23 a I 0 24— I a I —24 o 0 z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL z °m 0 No Recovery 1 Static Water Level w ®Split Spoon Q Approved by:TSP o Water Level(ATD) w 0, Figure No. A-4 'I • • 11 Ili AS @Ct Boring Log p consulting Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger StarUFinish Date 3/19/2008 Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows! N-value Material Type/ID 6" Water Content%-7r Type Description Depth (feet) 0 10 20 30 40 5C (ft) m=29%, 18 -200=100% 31 50+1. 26— 47 -26 Tip of sampler is wet. 27— LOG ITEM —27 28— 1 Page of 28 _ 29— —29 N-value collected again at 31.5;no sample 30— X— m=21%, 11 retained. —30 200=100°/a 24 50+ N-value(blow counts)possibly over-estimated 31— 38 due to sampler flexing. —31 11 32— X 20 50+ —32 31 33— — —33 Bottom of borehole at 33'bgs.Borehole 34— backfilled with bentonite chips. —34 35— —35 36— —36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— —42 43— —43 0 44— —44 0 N m 45— —45 a U 0 0 46— —46 C7 ui 5', 47— —47 0 z 4848 0 U a °a 49— —49 0 0 J o z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL EZ 0 m El No Recovery 1 Static Water Level Split Spoon Approved by:TSP W o ® p p V Water Level(ATD) W ow Figure No. A-4 • LOG ITEM # f Page-�_o f APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results • • Aspect Consulting LOG ITEM Adachi Landslide 080029 age -----_ Atterberg Limits 80 - 70 60 K CH or OH a -D 50 . ` 40 min t� 30 • MH or OH 20 A CL or OL 10 CL-ML ML or OL 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Liquid Limit •B-1 25 •B-2 20 ■B-3 10 Sample Number Depth(ft) As-Received Plasticity Liquid Plastic Limit USCS Moisture Content Index Limit B-1 25 23.54 26.4 48.5 22.1 CL B-2 20 23.90 18.0 40.3 22.3 CL B-3 10 _ 23.83 7.7 32.5 24.7 ML MP77 • • LOG ITEM rauld;uaalad Page-- `Lofjo 0 co COO co d' M N O O N N N . 2 (1;; 00Z# O m 0 a9# - d 7)1 014 to - d 2 N ::: °o a N o C1 L ow Q 17# 08/£ • Q O uzi/I 1,Y/£ • u1 U A a • U o O • - O O O T • • LOG ITEM Page20 APPENDIX C Slope Stability Analyses • L JG ITEM 0 # t • Page 1)4 of (11 • c., ___.......,,„ , , ... • ... „r, , CD _ — cl..... _ m c) •-CN/° 0 a) ,-8 o \ 1 0 o.) is) • co .t...,- c o _ Itt) DC) ` o ...i .1:1 -- E — co = a) o , Ei) - 9 co 0) ,- a) 0— 2 0`I-jj cr) a a),- ai 1 4 a- Lc) '2 .—1-31C ' CO 0 0) c . °) .(-5 0 I , cn C a)•— 1 i- 0 +-• C 0'r- ' -F.) _Ju)DC.)t.1_ .._ A , 0. Tri To P - I....-..-- : '' -14 [ 0 [ Lo CO fi F 0 o. o To . 1 a) 70 ' o '1"/") c OS '0 cp CO 0_ a ..c(.0 ,- O _ o w a) cn 0)m 1 I co cv sic) , 0 Lr) o Is) 0 Li") o d) CD if) CD in 0 LC) 0 if) 0 if) 0 10 0 LO 0 LO CD En 0 ..c J 0 0 0.1 ,r) r- c> cv in N 0 Cs1 In N 0 Cs1 10 N 0 Cs1 Ln N 0 C's1 LO r- 0 .7)0 4..• 1 .....o cv 0 0 0 0 ,-i -1 -I Cs1 Cs) 0,1 Cs, rl Cv") 01 rn ‘2, vt. v. szr 101) Lr) Lo 1.0 —0•—2 i . . 1 03 . c.ii 1 •- e ?...., , co_. 0 c , -< , _ oge _ 00 ogz oaz o6t. oo t. os o _ • • LOG ITEM # 1 1 0 • _,.,-) Page 1•,,2/ of 1( 1 cf, . _ ■ 1 ‘‘ - „.°,,'„,..,,,,,.. ,,,,•,,,, ,,:.,•_, .,• ,,,,, ,,,,,. 0 .--0 c,), ,.... ...„., , . , if c., , . 0 , ‘— , _..)00 c f ,_ L C) N L.. CD:L--•' .0 CO 417,, C 0 , 1 0 i- ------ , ■ A tr) ...... , C) (i ■ -ir) 1 .,,.... • •,.. (.,-) cw) = a) .-..... , ■ — as , —'t,)-.0 .- c) Ca.cry L E C•I a) C) W : , o -o a) u) s.) o c , ca _ (-)LI.. •(13 o Aiii ' tr, _ u) 0 (1) • Tn" -- a) r) 0) „ ' .-- .0 '0 r •--r) a C •- C2... ■ C3 .. •— ,_ [ tli:1 c , .9 cl -5 .(7) 0 ■ P (-) •. 1 5 c 0 o a) La3 a) S - ' (J Q 0 [ o L._0 ei3 C •• 3 u) < 0 '11') (1:1 otnc::. i.00LOo If) o 1.11 o ■.(') 0 ue) 0 in o Ln o Ln o 10 c Ln o -CD 0,7 .c .L.L- o c) o c, ■--1 v--1 r.-I t--I N N CV N 01 M Cn rn v. %:-.t■ ct. ca.. i.f) U") 1.0 L0 , F.r)) I ,-- . .. 1 , 0(.11.. 0 00£ 00Z • • LOG ITEM I - Page 9271 of4 -.2 0 0 =0 (00 0 6c.,1 , .. r)-F, co ch ,...,LO •k — •• (D C - ) c 3 , o) v h- 0)..,r 73.-(D 4-0, (f) if•••,:p --- [ • ) c _,_•■••• (D I 0 •C 0 o 2— ' - a wobT_ iv) Ca c 2 DLL. . s - 0 (NI = 0 0. ,r) . ,* k C\I 0 • I ' a \ T---- , •7 .■-; TI- . ..c - CO•- C ,-o - a. , CD _ "C3 1(/) C O a) wl IDO C _ cf) co .c = a) 03 o --ko E 0 E.a <- a) ce) i (NI -0 — C) a) In ,._ = ca.i:).)C< O (r) a) 0 ,- g a) 0 O C O C ..... U) 0 0 o V) a) cc) o 7 (1) u") Tr) 1:5 ... 0) L t13 .C1 0 I-- -.E 1 —4... co , ..-.4 u)c•si ' 0 C".1 A , o U) .-E- a) a) c7) 'ES_ 8 .c o)u) — I o 0 C.)LI-. (nc\ici_o , o .-o _c o ■-nour) otr) oino ■r> oLnou, ou) oir) oLnols) ou) o ,---Lo to o E -.- 0 N tr.) r-- ONcr) r-- ONcr) r— ONLf) (-- 00.1 ).r) r- OCNILOE--- 0 >•00 0,(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (00*-«_+.c ■ 0000 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ■—INNNN (,) co ro cn ..r. ,Itt •cr -1. cr) ifIcf) 11) t..0 C .. 00 0 < ci u— 0 u) --A ; ,c. , ,)z__I__.. '...4- - 0 ,-. . . - -—,-- , —1" -,--- 1 — - -- ■ 1 1 09C 00C 093 00Z 091. 001. 09 0 ,.. APN: Wd I032°2-(--) NAME: }-NACI4 later# Add.APN Add.APN SPAAD Category Intake Req'slillall ❑ County Zoning 0 ►- _ Cases/Conditions by Parcel# ❑ III== a s e ,� ater Service Area >= Printed from EH Map setOD ►� ❑ Plat Maps Laserfiche Documents ►® Road System --- ,' " Leave on for all or most maps Assessor Maps-H ❑ 1►: High-light parcel on Map Lots ti ❑ Parcel Tags-H kg., ,e_• & t:aL■_ Permits-H ,20bO-Shroreline Photos ❑ ►: id/ ght Shoreline Arcs O ► Shoreline Polygons��� ❑ DNMF2l=P Stream Class ;"O 114 11- 1 ' DNR Stream ❑ [ NR Water Bodies LFA-Fish NE11 ❑ Soils-H ❑ IMAM No parcel label Marbled Murrulets ❑ Heritage Points�r'�� ❑ Type: Spotted Owls ❑ Bald Eagle Nests&Buffers 0 ( No parcel label Priority Habitats and Species 8106 ❑ Type - Wetlands ❑ Rare Plants-Ecosystems ❑ Type: Seismic Hazard - ❑ Landslide Hazard ❑ FEMA FIRMS ❑ 11111all Map Panel#: Erosion Hazard" ='� ❑ Oral Aquifer Recharge areas 0 INT= A_ Wells-Chloride ❑ No parcel label Mineral Lands ! fl No parcel label SIPZ ❑ ►: Shoreline Slope Stability 0 11111;:' Chanel Migration Mra ❑ Airport OverlayslaTiM No Shooting Zone 1111Lall ❑ County'Zoning-UGA fl f LIDAR Hillshade ❑ No parcel label-Printed with Countours USGS Topos ❑ No parcel tabel 2005 Aerial Photos No parcel label Assessors Info MLA Number Form ,,. ►: Pre Application File ,0 p Reviewer Letter Sent telia. ❑ Eagle❑ Wetland ❑ ----Eagle Plan Required 3 ❑ ❑ 1 page❑ Habitat Man Plan 0 ESA Map Checklist 10-13-2008 Map Output rage 1 01 1. • • ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map LOG ITEM Page of 1.1111WC.rk 7}?344026 7C;?344008 /0,34402 70/14402/ /0Y-34407 /01144014 QeQC hb, 7tia34aL:4 701344034 705344034 7°33440° 10134Ar}•c ..... 743349423 7013440?7 /31:34404'1 703144036 ._ 1011440'6 741344447 ct, a 743.344046 /01144061 ' 101/440533 tT� ter,. 703344050 4 64'.032024 60 03 4x} 603031(X} 603032421 60303.006 ', ex 643032023 beer 60103220+24 64 Q33007 . �J}C:.3LYY?6 60'.03220:)3 xordnd try.61ierscri Corgi.Cerra Se..oesG S 0 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • Page 2 of 2 LOG ITEM Setect•LeedIenates JC Roads Parcets-H Page h(0 of Boundanes County Zontng MP4 SF Tact Para Rawketa 1 5 R".T$Rem:1mM 1 10 ;hrig.Retdarta 120 a NPR icFry Fat hrIPR kkiatrwy 4IPR%mai Carnahan .-4-Ka Recaatai NPR Gam',tam- aRea rtree. aCa-intact:rarm, 0 Acme,.lac 3..ear a A-a.r4.E.P7 MI Wage Cala- a■ 12) R,rd V,age Ce-ekr ReSar02 Sawa td. 0 AllX4 Ra:wszat Watte Mgt: ..LC Gamaaacts GC aOats-oak.CC a JGA as)Catrna-cd JGA Jram-g-t ixlatra JGA MGR JGA tiL1R JGA 3,4.11C JGA JGA atedCarrnaca 414a.0 C Ccaratelice lCt a*V4 M1 Cr 9:0.474.LC,CM, rcraa. Mr 1C-cf Rea,J,Ce Garay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:30:16 2009 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 CASES,FINDING I, CONDI IONS, F'tKMISSIUN5 I-OK Parce1601032020 • Printed: December 2, 2009 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner BLD95-00520 ADACHI Application Received: 9/18/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/26/1995 Case Finaled: 12/7/19©0 ITEM Garage No findings, conditions, or permissions found. # tr BLD98-00504 ADACHI Pa r,. t Application Received: 12/21/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/20/1999 Case Finaled: 12/297199g°1,��'`�- I single family residence No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR98-00226 ADACHI F S THEISS Application Received: 8/5/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/30/1998 Case Finaled: 11/30/1998 mobile home installation 1.) The application was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center staff on 11-16-98 for the potential presence of critical areas regulated under the provisions of the Ordinance, and the following critical areas were confirmed as potentially present on the subject property: landslide hazard, streams, wetlands, shoreline, aquifer recharge area. 2.) Acting upon the above information, Jefferson County staff conducted a site inspection of the subject property on 8-20-98 and confirmed the existence of the following critical areas and/or their associated buffers on the property: shoreline, landslide hazard, streams, wetlands along shoreline. 3.) The fish and wildlife habitat area is entirely associated with the shoreline. The minimum buffer for fish and wildlife habitat area along the shoreline is 30 feet as measured from the beginning of the vegetation line along the beach. In this instance, the required fish and wildlife habitat area buffer is entirely contained within the landslide hazard area and its associated buffer and needs no additional consideration. 4.) The bluff height is approximately forty (40)feet. The required setback from the top of the bluff is forty feet. 5.) These bluffs are considered unstable and are subject to catatrophic slides. The potential for an earthquake of a high magnitude occuring in western Washington in the near future is considered a high probability by regional experts. 6.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 7.) This waiver also includes findings and conditions for evaluation of shoreline areas as regulated under the provision of The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, adopted March 7, 1988, as amended. 8.) The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be 30 feet, or 1 foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank height exceeds 10 feet. 9.) The required setback for a structure/residence on this parcel shall be forty feet from the top of the shoreline bluff. 10.) A vegetive buffer of 30 feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the shoreline bluff. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the landslide hazard area. 11.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated geologically hazardous area, or its associated buffer. 12.) Damage to vegetation to be retained on site shall be minimized by directional felling of trees away from these areas. 13.) Landslide hazard areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration shall be made to the landslide hazard area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area Administrator. 14.) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a marine bluff, landslide hazard or ravine. If drainage must be discharged from a bluff to adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the face of the bluff and discharged to the water by tight line drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the shoreline. A shoreline permit is required to discharge water at the shoreline. 15.) A setback(buffer) of 15 feet, measured perpendicularly from the ordinary high water mark along the banks of streams located on the property shall be permanently maintained as a fish and wildlife habitat area. 16.) Fish and wildlife habitat area buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration shall be made to the fish and wildlife habitat area buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area Administrator. 17.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated fish and wildlife habitat area, its associated buffer, or any critically important plants and trees identified on the subject property. 18.) Damage to vegetation to be retained on site shall be minimized by directional felling of trees away from these areas. 19.) The proposed development shall be located on the subject property exactly as identified on the Universal Plot Plan, or other Site Plan, approved by the County as part of the triggering permit application. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting and notifying contractor(s) of the above conditions in order to ensure compliance at various stages of construction/development. 1 of 2 Cases Name Review Ivpe status Manner 20.) Residential structures shall iikxceed thirty-five (35)feet in height. SEP95-00383 ADACHI F Application Received: 12/28/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/23/1996 Case Finaled: 6/6/1996 NOW FILED W/SEP98-002b5 1.) 100 ft. setback to surface water and all wells to be maintained 2.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. LOGS ITEM 3.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 4.) Divert all sources of drainage away from septic tank and drainfield area. 5.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. Page 3 Of lu 6.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 7.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of a building permit on this site. 8.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 9.) 50 ft. setback to surface water from tanks to be maintained SEP98-00255 ADACHI F Application Received: 12/21/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/18/1999 Case Finaled: 12/10/1999 SEP95-383 NOW FILED HERE 1.) This site has been granted a waiver from the state onsite sewage regulation 246-272-09501, 50 ft setback required from well to effluent transport line. A waiver to 25' has been granted. Compliance with conditions of the waiver is required, double casing with specified pipe, pressure testing and monitoring by PUD for the life of the system on an annual basis. 2.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 3.) Setbacks to all wells- 100' required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50' required from tanks. 10' separation required between water lines and effluent transport lines. 4.) 50 ft. setback from surface waters to be maintained from tanks. 5.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. 6.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 7.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 8.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 9.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the septic tank and pump chamber prior to covering. 10.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 11.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 12.) Compliance with the conditions of the signed Critical Area Waiver is required. 13.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the pump chamber. Risers to grade highly recommended over inlet and outlet of septic tank. 14.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection and pump test of the septic tank and pump chamber prior to covering. PRE09-00034 ADACHI TRUSTEE P Application Received: 12/2/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: BULKHEAD REPAIR No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD00-00047 ADACHI F Application Received: 1/19/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/20/2000 Case Finaled: 2/24/2000 PROPANE TANK INSTALLATION No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM98-00255 ADACHI TRUSTEE F Application Received: 12/10/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. 2 of 2 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map LOG ITEM x'701344025, 701344008 101344020 t 101344021 101 3 4 44 37 Page 74 of i i M 701344014 73134. 4 /01344034 -- r v „1„,../i. 7013440143 r 701344010 'c _.._-_... _.;.__... r 70`344024 �.,- ,rPj 701344017 '1,, 7313440/7 ._ ; 10 344016 70,x440,6 701344047 cb Legend ,. - - a �*, Selected Features . m/01 344046 701344051 1013440 0 111. .i£Roads 10134450 ,cc. Parce3s-H n13oundarnes 601032020 601011031 Water Service Areas 33 I `l 60'.032021 601031008 6('032023 beer,Cr 60°032024 ee++i pd ' 60'032005 -_... _.... _... 60'031006 tips-roodnd'✓f.6A sal Cost'Cciri ueo:cx!s G63 ... 0,1011 `5,3811 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:29:52 2009 httn://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 road . • Page 1 of 1 ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 1253 DEER CREEK RD ROAD NUMBER:P484 LOG ITEM ROAD NAME:DEER CREEK RD ADDRESS: 1253 APT: REAL MILE POST: 1.24RT Page lip of I I I APPLICANT:ADACHI,SD ADDRESS CREATION DATE:09/23/96 PARCEL:601032020 LEGAL:S3 T26N R1W GRID:N-9-A FIRE DIST:2 ZIP:98376 POSTAL DISTRICT:QUILCENE PLANNING AREA:9 VOTING DIST:302 CEMETERY DIST:- HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST:49 WATER DIST: SITE LONGITUDE: SITE LATITUDE: SITE COORDINATE TYPE: ACCESS LONGITUDE ACCESS LATITUDE: MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS r i71-.U tti" http://isserver/Address/RoadAddressDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=P484&ADDRESS=1253 12/3/2009 • • Z > a ' • • r, wo O ° e S CN > Q 3 i j a N , O• 'r `V (...).• 0 tn w to n m m V _ - `V CD W a w 3 (--D cp Z `j) LOG ITEM (Mt _ N9Z - £ 4/13N) �- <=; O O 101 1.A00 \\\ �\ ry Page ill of it l v) \ /<// \ya) i 'O1 d I Q CREE,, �/�o ; \ w m �- /aE.R i '_/d w n — �' N ti -1-1N" J , N r N 0 N J no..., Li d O 0 0 M N O (n r Z.- g - Z Z PO, 01 m a0 w 1 I N ' o. oon^ --m o o"' w- 0 Z:72,00°3,. .-0> o r.JNM W O �(/ X �S cL\ I- 30 0'OM Z �'<- iO : o I Ni U ry N vJ l v N ^ o r F. m tll d�..,l- N W N O'>mn NN N r�.. �/O OOOd 0 O O 00 O O t� IImo^, ,000 n0•'�'°w 8 'oU V/ NO OOW < u~,vl v ''',11;.`12,' v) O o CC Mr O^ OOJNM 0010 O~r° y°F� wo-aN ' mom N O W m < - a I VU -I Fs N W N W / ';`-2F,41.1^.4 Z A 4 / / / N "../ / / IN / J rye' 6 �, ,\'' // 794y,".9 4 .a 6V m.o o. o 0 0 '' /. ./ / i . p ...;,,,,, <`.1,' / I 1 ^ U 'r,"! / -/ %' 1 / < iO 1 Ih O <� M J (Ml - N9Z - 4 4/13N) f H ti' i ..).:'..g4 ° O U ° -a uN W , K< Q x `0 O i N v;44 S a '4 n W Y. 28O 3.: • .K K O <- ' b F k O°pp . n Z Z O m °k < N ?0 . `" _ :- ;<J F WI N Z O W g <tt p 5 o K I < W N i ?.. y� w Z o s 0 ZQ N O !o= � o aE Z _ <Z W — 6 O =<y 6 W ° f 3 K O W g y- u K ° — r,_-U O IA �F LE- li 3 a Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 AreIMS HTML Viewer Ma• LOC ITEM 707344025 7013440 '27013444520 701344°27 701344037 701344014 8ek`s_ Page of ,, j 1 75.57-,44014 7i. ^ tt3 t 741 SA3+1 707344°1° ;¥ - ' , . .„9 ,:,7,". .y :' ,". z,„,,,, 1114402'3 I Vft , -'' rte ; `,,, ,,' 7°1344017 ` 70133440t n , ,,s,,t-Sa.._', ;ms`.µ . ,a,-1 . t41 _ ,4,., r 7473445;516 701344016 701344047 fl � Legend $. , M1 Selected Features `il 1llt /°1-1.44°5" 701344f' IC Roads ��, __,___ ., Paroebs-H aw Parcel Tags-H 647032424 " V' 6016.31(n5 ., "so 5.o1 ;R�o` - ■ :'wow 2gne: }ayh i X � '. , 647435 %3 to `' 4- � , Boundaries 'i ks x 5 w rt� I; . r i 605202 1! - 60/01008 s° . 1 0 .14%- riCo-ry f{1z3 � 4Q a 0 g,' r ' fly i . 0.eek 601632024 a 1� Q,y ta010.3°4'0,f Eolo-sztvl ,, 501032.505,,,„.,032,.....y, Miarssonded , s"ut1CGVR?'Co*YaSrs'r.l5115 _._... _........ _.. ). 58811 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:33:20 2009 httn://2isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITFI\1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma 7013440251 70134 ,701344020 70 1344027 Page of ji 701344037 701344014 8 ,... 76,3414 701344034 70,344034 7013440,0 701 ,0 701344020 11111111 ,r;i 7701344017 701344017 701344016 701.344016 70134404 r ` Legend a _ 701344046 Selected Features 70,3440.1 7011344050 I JC Roads 701344(750 Parcets-M • Petmits-H 601032020'` 60101005 Boundaries • �a4�cru�CarKy. 601031009 601°32021„ 601031008 Cmc Carnes 601632023 60,632024'". eek 601031007 601032001 }ro 44� 601632405: _: 601632003 At yssaada smCardyCvri4;sms GIS 55611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:33:33 2009 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 ■ Page 1 of 1 Washington Coastal Atlas Ph Display • , ,,,,.., ,,,, _ , , C+egartment of Eca(c�g' _.t its _Aas tik i Ib z e A, 4 to E 4 i to ;" SI AM., ';4 D , -• Photo 060623_00247 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Dabob Bay, Toandos Reference: Peninsula Panel Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 84Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,2843Kb) A xox.12 seconds for 5614 s nbderrg 2 seconds fcr Cable�DSL goprox.6.8 rrinc es for 5614-Ps ,nxlerr�60 seconds for CthIe�DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976 77 1992 97 2000-02 L.CG ITEM Pagel ja- lions://fortress.wa.�ovl ecv/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623 00247&vinta... 12/2/2009 V Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• .._ 701344026 701344006 7013.4020 sb, /01444427 • 74x,344414: 8e'...._ 701 X7037 •Qc4 Dr ' _ __. _......_ /013440,4 :'`. 701344034 ' 7013x4031 I M13'14010 , 701344010 itY 314020 70 1.344017 741344017 Legend c 4 Seleded features 70'344010 701344036 70'144047 ,' }C Roads $ 701344046 Parcets-H 701 14401 7013440110 a /0 344052 , ' Shoreines-Arcs 6014 f2424 64143°445 a G4• htsd 601032021, 641431003 404 Nv9.ra ` t "of Ccrsvau'kq 64'032023 eer e 601032014 eic "4 O'er BOUndanes 60103'021 ,a8r�anCo.rx:y 60103200" CRIts COSASC5 64"0320x'+5 EsY.43'0D6 601032003 Mss ranck+d by Jetssrr4Carry Scr.ces C,r-, 0 • 568f1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:35:18 2009 httn•//171 sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esriman?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITE ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma Page.f 7@4344026:' 7(14344(X16 a 7,0t3dao o A age J/ f i t 704344927 1 7L+4344fP37 -r-* -- - 704344014 ( geocb br : - tt 70434404 ' ., II III 7f}4344[734 704344034 r 1p 7043440 0 Y 704344040 r k 704 L-. /01344401x 701344017 1 I 7574 344036 70 _. 1 4U45 104144047 Legend ' Selec led Features _ � T343A40Ab ! r IC Roads /0,344061 e;701 4060 703344050 0 P arcels-M 1344R FP Stream Classification 6OtO32020 501 t(A3°i < • I F F - -.-_ yr NI Nog.s'1II X t34r}3tw fi is Na Nos ilk's r7S. e. 6}4932021.- 60 10336J3 Ay/ Ms Nas istiPietism S tsars S t'frltlr7�'NY!{a'.YC 50309h623.+t' , Bout7dar�ss �+ '•,,,, err n et, :c+R4r-.vtGaray. so-032024 R0' w 60,3.00, n Carlo.,. 60,,03200, Er}44?1Zt.X?a 60.„„... [tr=032003 Maus uvr4W,tx%sasCari.YCWd m ien-ossfIS 9 513641 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:35:40 2009 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• C • 741344426 XI 144003 - 7 74s344424 • . '4 0 701344021 . 101344037 1013440"4 8e 7,"344414 �, 1111 I. 1111‘11111111 il IIII 701344034 701344034 .__, _ l 70/344010 - 701 344010 � ,3'-f; -. 70134 024 '. 101344017 741344017 ,:_ 1413444+4).Q _..._ Let Legend 14 34 +16 to,34441e c° Selected Fea ides 741.344046 .1C Reads 101344%S1 101344'150 # bty Pa/cats-14 76344050 Q. DKR Streams ,4 Tym9 501632024 60103" /{0*, f_ f° Type T?x c Type 60...03202", 60103/408 j00"/ Ty-De t", T)1x 1 ff ors --••••""'"''...-1 Boundaries �6ee i^'eek R d ( 1 �c ° 7Cost 60°032024 E03031001 ❑Cea CvsACs 00143-2X2/ I 60/032,20_3 .. ,raaadad by..101e,scru Casty Cates Sar.+xs Gs^s _ r3. ; ft .r' FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:35:53 2009 httn•//o;ccerver/servlet/com.esri.esrimao.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• 701344025 701344005 701344027 • /701344020 .7; 701344037 _ # LOGPI a TgeF1Mof 1 I ........ Page___45____of_444, 70,1440,4 , a - ..., each 6, 701344014 .11. 11111 1.111.111111)1 ( 701344034 i 701344034 -701 : - - , ‘ „ , 4 i 701344010 ? ,00-0 / .4'." f _ A3.140.29 _, ' / 1 101344017 f,, 701344017 ■ A. 0 y0,344016 ,j- 701344016 70134464., g- 47 Legend , f , a lo/344046 0 Selected Featuces , 70,34405, 8' ■ -,-- JC Roads ,- 1 1, 701344050 - la 701344050 ..0 Paccels-H _ / 601032020 6010311X,15 1 Dt4R Waler Bodies 1111 F - ill N - 601031009 111 S • , 601032021 , 601031008 Ei NoOrraTidscrs t , ,,. Boundaties ,. - 1 Jess-un Coxrty 601032023 ri '014,er 601032024 ' : 'reek Ott:area-rites . €0103,(XV' 6010.32001 r 6V 032W5 6003,CX16 67,r 032003 Mays grchodsd by Mirrun Carey Cebyt&Yvan;GIS — 0 .wasmestmemssammin 58611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 18:36:14 2009 htt-01/21SServer/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName—ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output ?age 1 of 1 • • LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map # 1 ?41344425' 741344446 '.101344424 }� ?Q'34 2? • ?01344037 Page_�of (1 I ? ' 44414 a ep . ___. :.._ ?4344014_.. f'P61344Q34 ?QS 344034 _ f ?o134441Q 70,1,14010 + t ...L _ ..Cite,. ,_ ..._ ?Q134•1Q2�3 � `��� ?Q1344417 g*3 ?013440 7 g. ~ ?01344Q/6 '` � ?01344Q18 i011444.,4? O � i_ end -- 4 i ri Seeeated Feaiaues t & Sri 41 ?Q1344Q46 u1Ap.5�i 14'.114°'51 701344050., `: tr , „IC Roads i /01344450 4? , farGe1541 i t,C i I Sals-, 601032020 SolwIco H s �I C $auldanes 64?0314U9 n ,,,.ru „ea..y ,, ri ti+r E Q1i 3202t. 13403,006 j Oher Carnes , i w._�. 64'0331023 _ `,_... ' 'beer 1. 601032024 eek'd ` i t Ce 60'032001 A i' 613 4320 ,/ ' _.__.. Cz4 t�1flC?S riu: .. ,_ 64+432°43 Man0aaded try,.chrsw,Carry(,.elt-4.%.1CdSC _.. _ _.. ,`.°5,311 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:37:17 2009 Lii ic.,.0_ .. ab,b,„6..t L iitis,c._14..k12- .tis'1,kt 4 3 9 -54S so) 4.--4t-L 11,11,4.,41,,..,„_, ) /.5---seg,4?) .44- 4 to- 0 ab --: j60,6) keil '11-ti-t-1-1-0/'.' er_ - „, http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output III • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• # , . - -. -, ..... -, , , ..,, ---,--'';■,.'',.'''''',:,-,'-.1iiig,-.1:1„:::::' ,--:ii;;:i'i.4,11,i1;:iii,ii;;,,i,=:','-', ' ,- ' ---- /4 IA -3'.'.'n'll'44°25'' 701344008 70,1344120 p — / ,, . =. r . - - : .... =,.-.,.:::11,;t:-..;;;=.,..::`,.-:,..-'5,-,,Tri-fi:=1-,-:Ti-2,ii.. ..:,'.i.i• , ' ' 4. ,,'-. ., ,..,-,' 701144037 age....,512_0f_m4._____ ... ,. .. ,.. .,.....„.....„.,.„.„..,„..,,,,,.. . ,..44k.i.j.,.3:.,',...7:,..:■.:7V.;,,f geet,-"----- ------, -' .„. ' ' - ,' ,' ' - '' - --,..,,,,,,4156.-.4,,,,;,,,,,.::-,•:,:ir--!:,:-.---'...,,','17,',' '-- ' 1' ' , ,'.` '' - ' ''-' -' ,'' ..-,`,4i3.44,,,',4glig.,,ff;'Agi.,. ..;;:::;:r.;-::;:::;,.=,,i;,{:07'-r."'..77-if--.•-v.--,'°,''',^, 044014 r‘l.,.':•..". 3 '' ' ' 701a4400 -:.:---.-',... -.. sy--•:, 701144010 ; IIIIIME: , 1 ■ iiiI;11110:7:1-1111g.4i&T-tii4-tli;J--1 r• gf-'1"----'-----.-----'-'-------'-",--,------r--,-----: A V.14E1:4i1.7311; , , ..;,!:--;,„,7..; '',-''-' --T-77-1 r '?11 7°1'144°16'''.- . ..,...--,'-'1 Mi'344016 1°1344°47 g , , Legend J''',4;:i'..;:j1:',...:'J..• ?-c.''i';'-'L:',.:;--tr:i.tiiiii'i'',",f.-i./'-"-------------,,-----;-,-;4"''' --,■- . ,,,,1---- ',. •Pc- , '-.: 0 Selected Feature-s .i"..J..ti.'3=ii...','-:::::::";-:1;-":-::.g:`;..."1'':i.".'e' • . ''' ' fi'' ' ' ' ,I, /01144046 ' Aia;:i.ri=!;;;211illr;iii!'ili•='-,T.,!.,;;,,,,,-1,,i': " , 7°1-/441)5' . '--' 1! JCRoads -i..':CI' - ' . 70344050 4- P 4 A1 ',,c;111§i.j'' 4'7', (r aPD91541 .4;i■ill :...■■■•!. NPI:i')il,..'<.'' .. ' . :' ;.,':■■' : .'..r...'; ; ■•■■■..' 4. Saki Eagle Nests 601012020 ...,„.--:,... ' ' =:,-......., , Bald Eagle Butters - ,..,,,,,,,,,:.,,,,„'.„:-=„,...::.?„:':::=-:;:f." ''''' - '•. ' '''' '''',..1.. .-'-'-' ''-.' - r 1327 Wks -: 6003(X15 '. • 4w s.,F., V:iiT;A:1';;' ::: ,': , - - -,,, ' ---.. ..- N.'..i-111:1:t;:ii:iiiiiit;ik,,..ti '-' ::"" : . ,„-,-,::::::.:4".14i.ii?;-:.:;:;..V. • -'. ',60032021' OXt cr. .rts,1 walks- I: ::::.;.,`;,IF:Iti:ii.;:iif,:i;i::'-'1'.'1...,..-• . " *- . ,...,._, Vili".:ti;;T,W,:, .i.3;7?,',V1■ 1'...,..:,1::',,:.....1 r.- ' ' , SoundarieS :.=,-1.:=:=-:::.,.-- . '' '':::------- '' ' -')" ' '''' 4;e1kr.jaq C OXItY :H4',.;'..,,■:,',.. 601032(123 1 0 $'2.i.?..:::0"$-:;:.$:-;!;$$$,!$;'..:,$ -. -:-..-..7.:-..----T---- eer ---$- "-----: - 1 ,---- 6 c,- ee,ts.4,1 F-7 oh...Carttz :::,.,!,,-441;..:•,i;',',;_;,--JTV;;;.4 ;'• 601032024 A:-..11:1',.f.=';',',4i.":•!;=:!:=r?.?'.:3...,..3= ',,,, , '-'..----,-----...--- - / ,,i 4' '' . r' '' - ' ' '...,,'' i 60 1 03 1 00 7 ,ii 1 , '..:';'. Tf . ' ' t'- .n .■ 2'.'''..'i':■.'''''::. ,'''','.;.'-'''.1. IA :-r-''- --.''''..T.-'-',-2-''''''''''''',::'-./ .',"" - - 601-a-31(xY3 , • - 60101SM Mw50,70,:led try...krNtrual Casty Cerwzi Se,,,cm GO , „ - .9 _immosomineassamoommine 65811 - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:38:07 2009 httn://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovinalp&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 . . Map Output � •�� ��� Page 1 of 1 �� _ LOG /7-��k� --- `~ ITEM �-�v» ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. # f I 701344023 701344003 -. 7013.44020 ��� P«� ...111111111111.°)41'141 701344034 701344034 Legend Selected Features � JCmoads p°rGmsw / ^ ' -- Wetlands 601032020 60q031036 �� aovmuaoso � = ________ a"=�u°�/ 1--- aromu� w"., 601032021, 60°031.00.3 [_] oh"^°""= t 601032024 ii . i 60/03.20C,5 601032033 .6r..)t0,31026 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:38:33 2009 hnn.//qinserver/servlo�ooru.cmci.eurinman.|�nricoan?ServiceI�anoc=ovzoanJ�(�}ien1\7eooioo=4.... 12/7/2004 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• p I 7o1amoii' 701344U 76114e020` ?(D1344437 " ° 7(99344414 ' � � " „ 1 y � `74134+kA34 � 7i913+l4�1' � t 741344414 { 741344014 7oi3440213 -;` It31304Q17; 701344417 3'F' 7e1144016 ' 7013g4016 741`44447 r c Legend Tt}1344046 Selected Features 741.344451 701344050.'. D$ , r.I „If Roads 7#113444519 Lands'ide Hazard 601(.1323i'0 641031005 s,des 64*.0314:99 Node 60?032021; 6010.3100,8 3” Boundaries ° 60/032023 1 W1032024 40 0¢x,Cart 6011:331407 604orzok 1 601031436 60'032CO3 Maws aru++dod ery.2c4m+on Carfi'Cvrr$.iesssres G`5 .. G MingianaleStiSeaft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:39:00 2009 httn•//c isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output Page 1 of 1 • 11, LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. * I ,,' 70/3448,25 701344808 -i 70t 344020 -- 701 344(iI7 / Page53_0f_ju , 70,3440- 37 I 701344014 ., VI 10 ' 701144014 ' / 1 701344034 ' .' 701344010 ,7 /01344010 ; . / , 0 71344020' 11111111k,ril 1 II A3134401/ '' A0134401/ 43 440.,6 /01144041 t. /01344016 _ ,o Legend / .z, 0 Seieded Features , ,' a,701344040 /01344(61 i01344050 -0,13 ■ 2/ -IC Roads 7Or344OSO ..ke FEMA FIRMS 601032020 W1031035 / . A * MI 601031009 1‘,'•, 601012021, 601031008 111 X530 11111 Orier ) Boundarres 1 , , 7 ...VisrsariCarty 1 601032023 fl ..., eek40, 0 o„,rc.......s 6010,i2,24 60,03.03, 6,03200-, . ..... 60031005 601032003 Maps p•cresied ty,.Ssfessas Coo*Cant,P Sstssoss GG 0 weingsmillsolmossilm 568/1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 18:39:26 2009 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName—ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma•• 14 701344025 701144008 jS3i'3A Mi3(3 701344037 --+ 7"age `, ` 1 / 701344027 i 1sT o I I i- 01314 4 " ; l4e14434 7013414Sk7 _.. `r ,' = 3 r 744344019 ?.).s.i40`.(3 (,;' 'J 7(.31:3.31017 701344017 t i , 74139Ar3°b 7013+t•146 ?314(417 ° Legend 0..- Sele+,'ted Features 74/344046 ,lC Roads 747344051 ''74 3410354 b 701344°Y) 4) Parcels-H Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 601032420 W310310'5 O SJSC-‘14K 60'031004,0 ® SA!2PA+SU:SC JY032021 67(73(33.33,B A,RPA E] :SPA+LINK er,7.032423 Boundaries ,. e k a c+' 1m-sm Casty a 60'032:24 f I Nfater _.... 6(.1103=t_N07 Cn Cu.rdc +.)14377 (�;.43200 501`0311105 60.032.:03 411*s crrmdcd try.:efkrsar CGX11V Cmb- ::+cnsces GiS 0 '56811 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:41:43 2009 httr,•//111 ccerver/eervi et/cem.esri.esrimau.Esri map?ServiceName=ovmao&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• LOG ITEM 701 344025` 701344009 '70i 544020 701344027 ,' _- • 701344037 p _ 70,344014 se / _i { 70,344014 _ _ 70,34AGL34 } 701384034 -- —_ i 701344010 ' 701344010 v.,... .__ `' 701-34 .t .1111111,CrPj 7013440/7 '* ,, 701344027 i 7 70 344016 * 70134+7017 Zi 70#,344016 - r Legend s' ,, --'' 1, 170/344046 Selected Features 701344051 701344050 ', -p� ` ,IC Roads ' 7°13'14°58., _ _ Parcels-14 . We londe 60/032020 601031005 . ,ODs legs ` _ c y neumen 100a-d 2,731 # ' 60/031009 * 2,30._,1 60#032021; 601031009 Boundaries Elatzifer5a1Ccrsrly 601032023 ..___. .._. :,..:,.., , 4e �, ee� a l ) cYlts cont.,. � , 0"0,03202A , , R 41010:1,007 60103200] 60103200:5 ! _..... 50 1031005 a 6015,32103 Maps;ronded M„o,`assi Cartel'Cv7at&vexes GS r? 568' f7 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:42:02 2009 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• II f _ X R 1-3_1 37 -sl 1 t R 1 Rdf 4/ Of_ A j cr , *a .2orrt;?, lorrIfer, 111641 11.91111°11)1111'7411 ' p t # i .E t, i 1 iR , -i i" ar` ', .t. Legend 14464 ' 7t1134ad45 0 Selected Features ',a = 1111tr,_1 ,, JC Roads rt■r.x' • _ Parcels-H S IPZ ■ Tilt RccsPz i i 5010310000 .^"�t; 2 n F %fr +, to-ii r s ` Soundanas -- , 601(1 23 deer a ov„e 801032024 ek I'd d 60101310 07 i ' 5010 3 4X* 5010320(.13 Mars prcmded by Jekrun C6."0YC:etc uerrcrs GS ...__. . o �+tei FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:42:17 2009 httn-//¢i sserver/servlet/com.esri.esriman.Esriman?ServiceName=ovman&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• °age 9-/ D1 709 1 , a :13440_ r �r 9344090 709344090 — _ i. 709-34vtT29 - 7093441097 701304097 J 701304096 r 70 144096 701344047 g Legend 4 Selected Features y F v 7°1344((/6 JC Roads 709304ta5f 709340Ci50 � � � _ 709304050 ¢ Iw Pa tels-H 41. St1ore ine Slope Stabdity ` ; 6 @lob9409 . • II-stale Rx=Ktauchutb €41032021., 601031008 ira9zEte Ctd taviwcte 1111 Madicd 601c320232 .,__.. 13oundaraes bee I I .....n.z,.,co.nt) 6 0 9 432024 _ eek 441 I ) •.Vac 60,03,007 Li C Carkcs 609032009 669032,( fyJ<439006 6Y7t432CK.L`i Maxis erw+dedtry de3#esstn Carts Ccwrs s¢^rres GZ ... .....-}0 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:42:37 2009 httn://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Page 1 of 1ii Map Output • 0 LO ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma # 1 , :',70114,4412 , lot 344O8 i i, // 70i 344020 A.." 4 f .,,,./.,A,.MI ‘• ,.il i 76 load pH it i Page . If i .. 70..?410,,,1.1---.,...'letko, ',,,::.:,fr, WI 11111147:16 ,,,,,,,%,, ( ,---,Tip:: 'r -',"- .7013,440.16,- _ --/f,-,i,.101344016 , i,, ,,rr,,:.;:,-,',-":. r,,, '-'-:,22=7‘"_-- - ' : ,,r,r::' ----11., ' , L : ' — Legend ,,,',. 'ti .i.-4''''...--"-z- 1-..-.' ..-p-- -'".;_} , ,'1 i:' ri Selected Features "'''''',,'?;;'',,,:. ,"/1- '---r,, i .c,7if4 i , 1 1 k,,1 w 1013440.46 ; .,,,J j 4,:i.,;,,::'1:',.::',i';013,,426/: 1, 1:I ;' I ' „,,' ,,',, ; ,, i' P ;,,`:,1 ,v- jc Roads .,,,,,,,,.,ry 1,,,q ., if 5 ?913,,ta,,,,,, 'br,,, ,,i :.: ...e !' ' ' ,''_._.r___,----- .' ') .7(n3'14C4°, ',,,:_,,,,,..:.,';: Pear-els-14 '; -7'' &....N., ealrliOU'r5 , 1 ',':',''' : -601032020 ,1,-: f• ------------"-:-:eatoloas icr:''.. .,, - ' `-'1, 'I -0, ,;;' /.';;--=.-) .;):;-!--:'; 4' iifz.,„;.: '..•:,',' ',.-;7' '';?. ''''• 03i000 ?„., '',, *), '; ., ', 1,,:,-,,- : , -,::.::..,....- ,,...7.-;-','r,,'-', , ,q; oundanes L.-:=1‘,•_„,'::----„':`-';-„',,,,:E*1011008„"'-':, :'-.7-77:-Tr-t="'"? ---' (<-' 'I - ---' -----?kr,--' ;In 0';''',,'• ', \.;i , "`,.'---. ': '''A A - '.'' :', y.):2-;4',---';•-■":- ---iri'e,i'''.:.;"...-°°;":-::.'";,: '''''----7;-'-=7'77'.-' /Y , \,... : D1',;11,,''." ii,''-. _. -_..7e4r4-cr:. ; A:1-.-:-_:;,! , 4-.-.----=- .-_,-1'.', ':::,0, ( /;/;,','-';"''';'-'--:-::..---;„.1?—; .,----,..--. " ----..._, ',-,',.:;;,:::-• .60,03,001 :- - 41:10.;:::-- ;,-)-a,,Ci,-- ,,i. ,,,,,/,,,,7 i' ' 1 ,-- ,J :;, ;;,:y 01032,',7:-'. ) :- ? 'T-' ' , - o032 2 - 1_ =,:---7- kizrA zratIck3d,•.4•,:etitrsol Ca41:0. ..:y1Vd FiC;VCCSG,tS ' J: i :, , , , 4 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:31:09 2009 http://giSSerVer/ServietkoM.esri.esrimap.Esnmap.ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output III . Page 1 of 1 a % ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma 701344025.` ms3naixaa _�-70134/020 701344021 7 s { 1344037 Page of ' � � � '`701344414 �' g� �ro __ 3A4U1��E ' x-s�' ! t0a -w—r � IE 7�13aa4 ssn , ?Aassa�3a : 5 74134441: 701344010 �� `` k f L fu 74134442A x "fi � 47/1 701344017 t ` `r m t �► 74134d0t7 • s � z. .r *� � �. r3's ",gyl" .-��- ,. s,5 a#r '`-s 701344016 701 3440€ 701344(147 .. '1'`'''''''',,''' u . `# �`es tit w F �; ', , _ ;' _ CO it Leger � '':1:747:1,-;,;',' '� .. 1- p Selected Features �l ��" '-'1.'",'-''',,',':-..''' x�' _ K ws d 7 @134atta6 ~ - — 701344451 7_,_.;_701 4 tO Q. JC Roads .14,,,,".''' 1. Q Parcels t r Boundaries e 1032f120 i�€110310g5 Vass-suECa Cask).* Yt e ar 601wilt t•F 1 , f- > - r, s' £ .'"3 �+ # I I f7er c.a.=7.x 601432021 3 'aJ % Yfx..!<," 60143143t)a :,- ' t 103124' �'t a. .. 63 - 60103.1007 k>i„ .l , :"` x", rt, ' ta y d1r r€' g's..` k'c .ma'�c x E''> 5 €013001 r . 0max§ t ,� 0 � 1 by..€01432 )5 � dW' aYi�V` -� 1 � } y m/-...4' o-l z €003 s £ 2113Y35 30cT44dtr(t`tlFSCEI'Ci0-/,C+611'.Y SBY'iCL} "`dfMk¢ .ti.'m-_...'x, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:43:35 2009 http:// isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • • inipPio.ag:(1 of 1 LOG ! FM ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma # II R. .~, r 70i ;� ,.,� Page �►ro �f /ff Jt ,44•F • ! ' .701344014 ge _t. .41� / * 11 I i ■ • • Ey., •; sn 11111, e, ' 1. .F L ,' .ill 7013�4a4�0r°14 t I •r'r-* i •701 ,,ec + 701344!134:ill it ! s . • !�r}701344010..: "1 1013-04[310 , '1 - r*.°.•a .P w l` 701344029 � ,f.'t��II + • t= 714.344017 701344017 ;1:, -, ° , it* I a` y 41• t 701344915 4701344016.1.,701344°4 7 l' Legend ' - _ - S 1ected F i ler y -� r791 a ea 1,1� r$ ►- '4-4 701344031 .1701344050 j .,r JC Roads _. 7/3134 ti5f1 " ,', n 641f332@2! v Ti tJSGS Twos 6t311?31(395 9 ;. 8tlualdalles 1 • �?�.�� h 1` _ A 6(?1031 �t .e -%, 'A : '. \ iki ' „fif DYE cn sacs 1. 691)3202, 1 601031008- •- -- �� ' {bi332023 f -,.••firz . , ... . r #' - r h 4 f (3224 } if r+, t. ' „' 601032001 :11; ;.• f` 601932405 M �ca.`dcd by s 0crsen Car�°Y Cant*3cssxces t _ '. ”''`} R. - _ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 08:43:59 2009 I!, httn://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Map Output • :14 Page 1 of 1 LOG ITEM ArdMS HTML Viewer Ma• ' y,, a.. 70134; 1348006' 70136' Page 62i of .1344037 701344014* 1 70134401 r 1 f° ,13446 ' t1344010 701 . . `t134401T. +` 70134401 t134401�6 701344010 70134404 .$ LEf�Etit; " u 201 ' Se-tacted Features 701,344061 ; 701344050 7y „�= .,v' JC Roads . 701 f.a,1 .cE .„, - . „p Parcels-14 2005 Aerial Photos 1032020 ,� a, r_ Boondanes 601032021 6010 1 I a:. slow Comte 601032023 4 � .eto3f00r' t^c r ,w M s paid dMdelbsm Cauly Crrrx$5enrns{YS '�i °. tity FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Dec 02 18:44:12 2009 httn //uiscerver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2009 Parcel Print . . Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:601032020 05/14/2007 LOG ITEM 1 Owner Mailing Address: SEUCHI ADACHI TRUSTEE +- YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE ADACHI LIVING TRUST 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Site Address: 1253 DEER CREEK RD QUILCENE 98376 Section: 3 School District: Quilcene(48) Qtr Section: NW 1/4 Fire Dist: Quilcene(2) Township: 26N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 323 Planning area: Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S3 T26 R1W I LOT 1(N1/4) I SUB) TO EASE V500/P97 , e r , f 1 httb://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=601032020... 12/2/2009 } • • CC •4- I-I 07 O CT) Z u_ LOG ITEM H C) i f/,�,j, ( 0 O O J []® {��C CD - N s- NC w �- I a e7�° + 931 '0 - N J 1 4- CD O 0 0 L CD Z C C -o -I--I CO Z 0 C) CD = H 0 p CO w -4--' "0 I-I 0) 0) I 0 C L L O E .. .= sa o U U LU 1 0 Cr J a a F- I- O U C) U) CD U) 10 O 0 U cr W C = x' co F- H Co \ p w _ o Cr) h- S J U CD w m O CC O) U F- LC) C C O H H co w F- 1 N ` 1--1 3 = w Cl) CD 3 CO C) w CC F- = Co F- 0) CD Cr) cn CC .- LO I- CO CC CO .- -0 w Cn = F- co C LU m CV >- J w H Cr LU 0) w LU CO Cr S F- C_7 O CD w w ¢ CD U Z C C .- CO F- X \ O Q H H Q .. a CD X d- <C CD ¢ Q CD S 3 = 3 CO CO 1- \ W = I- <C U H F- J CU O: •-- CC LLJ Q J NF Q Z C) I- 1- I-I CD Co U LU a CO -' 1- X w S Q H U CC U CU H F- U) J U = Cr) Q F- -3 = 0) 0. H O U CU F- 0 F- co U co fo g H Y ¢ N 4 U) CO O = CC 0 2 O w C) CD 0) LU CD Cf) J CO CD -i--I '�. U CO y- <C .- Cl) <C CO - -I-0 0 O C) C/) CU O CD C) N CO CO O U CC O CD CO <C 0) O CO O O Cr) N O O O 121 C_ CU 1-- CD U CI) CO CO It C O U a) L 3 L Q Y C - U) O +' O O U) a) D) m -- D) c¢ U) C) Co CU L > f0 0 L L O — O C0 Q L 0 co X i-' U -0 x f0 CO a (0 -- •- (0 F- F- X C4- F- O (O Cf- CO X X F-- CC ............ . . • LOG ITEM PRE09-00034 Page_ of Pre-application Conference -�+— Seiichi and Yoko Adachi Slope Stabilization Attendees: Jennifer Rotsten, Representative; Geotechnical Engineer; Seiichi Adachi, pro e dY owner; Jeffree Stewart,Washington Department of Ecology; Donna Frosthoim, JC Development Review Division Meeting Date/Time/Location: December 15, 2009/10:30/On-site Owner/Applicant: Seiichi and Yoko Adachi, 19223 34th Avenue South, Seatac, WA 98358 Description of Proposal: The applicants are proposing to construct a reinforced earth buttress and rock armoring on a steep slope. The proposal is to place 1,420 cubic yards of sand and 110 tons of rock. Geogrid will also be embedded into the slope. The parcel is adjacent to Dabob Bay. The Jefferson County Code is available on-line at http://bvww.codepublishinq.com/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Land Use: • Zoning—Rural Residential 1:5. • SEPA(WAC 197-11)—Submit Environmental Checklist. Shoreline Master Plan: • Shoreline Designation—Conservancy • Application will be processed as shoreline substantial development under Jefferson County Code (JCC) Chapter 18.25—Shoreline Master Plan (SMP). Under the SMP, permitting for slope stabilization is a Type III process,which requires noticing and a public hearing. The proposal would go before the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner, who conducts the final review for compliance with the JCC SMP conditions. For project permitting, the applicant must demonstrate that the requirements specified in the following sections of the JCC are met: JCC 18.25.130 (Conservancy); JCC 18.25.190 (Secondary Uses); and JCC 18.25.430 (Shore Defense Works). • Jefferson County will forward a copy of the application and decision to Washington State Department of Ecology. This agency will have final review of the project for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: • Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas—Listed species within Dabob Bay. At this time, no Habitat Management Plan would be required by Jefferson County for permitting. However,the proposed project would be constructed within a bald eagle shoreline buffer, which requires state review. The applicant should contact Shelly Ament at Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine if a Bald Eagle Management Plan is required. Her contact information is: 360-681-4276 or amentkma(a�dfw.wa.gov. • Wetlands—At this time, no wetland delineation or report would be required for permitting. • Geologically Hazardous Areas—The steep slopes are mapped as a geologically hazardous area. The October 27, 2008 geotechnical report from Aspect can be used for permitting. If any changes are made to the report, submit a revised geotechnical report. • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (at risk)and Aquifer Recharge Area(susceptible)— Project is not expected to affect this SIPZ or aquifer recharge area. • ,LOG ITEM Stormwater: Page Ig of • Proposal must comply with JCC 18.30.060 (Grading and excavation standards)and JCC 18.30.070 (Stormwater management standards). • Proposal is to be designed based on the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. • All plans submitted must be stamped by project engineer. Application and Fees: • Complete Shoreline Substantial Development Application includes the following: o Master Permit Application o JARPA o Environmental Checklist o Development Drawings(plan and profile views, shown relative to OHWM) o Site Plan o Stormwater Calculation Worksheet o Fees due at the time of application: $2,793 ($2,083 for shoreline substantial development; $710 for SEPA review) • A building permit is required. Building permit fees are in addition to the shoreline permitting and SEPA fees listed above. Apply for a building permit after receiving a shoreline substantial development permit. OTHER REGULATORY/LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS • The project must comply with the Shoreline Management Act and receive approval from Washington Department of Ecology. • The project may need a Hydraulic Project Approval (H PA)from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. • This project may need a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This agency has jurisdiction over waters of the U.S., including wetlands, and issues permits pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The Corps contact is Ronald Wilcox(Seattle District/Regulatory): Ronald.J.Wilcox(cr�usace.army.mil . • This project may be reviewed by Washington Department of Natural Resources. 18.25.120 " • III Page_141_ of IL County planning and building department. Any structure not utilized for over one year shall be (1) Definition. An area with valuable natural, removed regardless of future anticipated use unless cultural, or historical resources or environmental prior permission has been granted by the Jefferson conditions that should be protected,conserved,and County planning and building department upon managed to the extent that a continual supply of showing of good cause. those resources such as soil, water, timber, fish, (b) Permittees for developments in the shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted aquatic designation shall be required to post a per- but are maintained. Also included are areas con- formance bond or other suitable guarantee to ensure Gaining sensitive environmental conditions that removal of all structures,equipment,and materials, may limit the potential for development or use, should the project cease operation.The county may including but not limited to steep slopes, flood- require security beyond that required by the state if prone areas, eroding bluffs, marshes, bogs, it is determined that state requirements are not ade- swamps, and accretion shore forms.Low density quate to secure removal of structures. residential and recreational uses are permitted pro- (c) Permittees shall be liable for all damages vided these activities do not significantly degrade to public and private property should their struc- or deplete resources and respect limiting environ- tures fail. The county may require liability incur- mental condition. ance beyond that required by the state if it is (2) Policy. To protect, conserve, and manage determined that state requirements are not adequate existing resources and valuable historical and cul- to cover damages. tural areas in order to ensure sustained resource (d) Aquatic developments shall not be stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions approved in narrow channels,shipping lanes,or in are not subject to inappropriate uses.[Ord. 11-00§ other areas where they are a significant hazard to 5(4.103)] navigation. (e) All structures that could interfere with 18.25.140 Suburban. navigation shall be marked in accordance with the (1) Definition. Areas where residential activity U.S.Coast Guard Private Aids to Navigation. may approach urban density, but usually where (f) The maximum level for noise generated densities permit space for small numbers of live- in the aquatic designation shall be 50 dBA at a dis- stock, gardens, or wood lots. These areas are tance of 100 feet.This standard shall not apply to served by individual or community water supplies, vessels that are underway. All feasible methods but generally are not linked with utilities from an shall be employed to minimize overwater noise urban center. Commercial activities to serve the generation. needs of the immediate area are considered an irate- (g) Structures placed in the aquatic designa- gral part of this designation. tion shall blend into the surroundings to the great- (2) Policy. To provide permanent residential est extent feasible utilizing appropriate color(s), and recreational areas outside of urban areas, so texture, nonreflective materials, and other design long as development of these areas provides ade- characteristics. [Ord. 11-00§5(4.101)] quate facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, open space, and the like without severe degrada- 18.25.120 Natural. tion to the lifestyle that was sought initially. [Ord. (1) Definition. A shoreline possessing unique 11-00§5(4.104)] or fragile features either natural or cultural,that are essentially unaltered from their natural state or rel- 18.25.150 Urban. atively intolerant of human use other than that for (1) Definition. The urban environment is an passive activities.Included are those areas contain- area of high intensity land use,including residen- ing hazardous or unique environmental conditions, tial, commercial, and industrial development. Ur- such as highly erosive bluffs,tidal marshes,. estu- ban shorelines should be designated for high aries,and active landslides. intensity use or multifamily residential develop- (2) Policy. Aquaculture developments and went.The urban designation may also be applied to mechanized harvest practices involving substantial areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding substrate modification through dredging, trench- land use is urban and urban services are available. ing, digging, or adverse sedimentation should be (2) Policies. prohibited in wetlands and estuaries which are nat- (a) Development in urban areas should be ural environmental designations in this master pro- managed so it enhances and maintains the shore- gram. [Ord. 11-00§5(4.102)] line for a variety of urban uses, with preference (Revised 10/01) 18-128 WO I 1 tivt Jefferson County Code • :4: ( 18.25.200 Page 1i._E_ ceed 35 feet as measured from mean higher high During application review,the basic element or water(MHHW). intent of a proposed development will guide in the (e) The redevelopment and revision of determination of the proposal's particular use existing wharves and piers may be permitted to activity.When a proposal contains two or more use I serve water-dependent or water-related uses. activities within a shoreline designation, each Water enjoyment and non-water-oriented uses may activity may be reviewed independently and the be authorized as conditional uses on these struc- total project considered on the whole. tures,provided such uses are integrated elements to In the review of a shoreline permit, consider-. an overall redevelopment plan meeting all of the ation will be given to the cumulative impact the following conditions: project may have with similar use activities. This (i) The redevelopment is to an existing, review is to ensure that the resulting total effect contributing structure within the Water Street Na- will not thwart the intent and policies of the partic- tional Historic District as recognized by the Na- ular shoreline environmental designation, nor tional Trust for Historic Preservation; result in substantial degradation of the shoreline (ii) The structure is recognized by appro- itself. [Ord. 11-00 §5(4.20)1 priate historic preservation agencies as having local and state-wide historic significance; 18.25.180 Primary uses. (iii) The structure has an established his- (1) Definition. In general, those categories of tory of mixed uses, both water-oriented and non- uses that are deemed as being preferable with the water-oriented uses; definition and policy of a particular shoreline des- (iv) The redevelopment does not exceed ignation. the structure's historic,overwater footprint; (2) Criteria. Primary uses are presumed to be (v) Buildings and other structures 10- generally consistent with the policies and definition cated on the wharf or pier are approved by appro- of the shoreline designation where it is located. priate historic preservation agencies as being Projects will be reviewed for consistency with spe- compatible and reinforcing of the architectural in- cific goals and policies and must comply with the tegrity of the historic district; performance standards specified for the particular (vi) A significant element or component type of development being reviewed.[Ord. 11-00§ of the developed area is dedicated to water-depen- 5(4.201)] dent and water-related uses; (vii) At least one-third of the pile sup- 18.25.190 Secondary uses. ported structure including a perimeter walkway is (1) Definition.Those uses that are not automat- dedicated for public access and enjoyment of the ically deemed as being preferable within the scope shoreline. All public access provisions shall be of the definition or policy of a particular shoreline completed and available for public use upon corn- environmental designation. pletion of the first component of the development; (2) Criteria. Applicants for shoreline substan- (viii) The redevelopment will not result tial development permits for secondary uses will in a reduction in the amount of physical public ac- have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: cess to and over the water as currently exists; (a) The proposal will not be contrary to the (ix) The city of Port Townsend shall be a general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, party to a binding agreement to guarantee that pub- nor shall it be contrary to the goals, policies, and lic access and enjoyment provisions are continu- performance standards of this master program. ously maintained. [Ord. 11-00 § 5(4.106)1 (b) The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and 18.25.170 Project classifications. waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. Development proposals are categorized within (c) The proposed project will not cause each shoreline designation as primary, secondary, unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or conditional,or prohibited uses.This priority system other properties and will be compatible with other determines the proposals administrative require- permitted uses in the area.[Ord. 11-00§5(4.202)] ments and encourages activities that are compatible with each shoreline designation. In all cases, the 18.25.200 Conditional uses. applicant shall have the burden of proof to show (1) Definition.Those uses that are deemed least consistency with the provisions of the Act and this preferable within the scope of the definition and master program. policies of a particular shoreline environmental designation. While not prohibited outright, these 18-131 (Revised 10/01) Lk..JV ( 1 r_lw Jefferson County Codes 18.25.430 Pa.(4.. (1) Sewage disposal systems shall not be (b) All feasible means shall be employed to located within the floodplain of marine and fresh ensure that data,structures,and sites having histor- water bodies unless in compliance with the Jeffer- ical, scientific, educational, or archaeological sig- son County floodplain management ordinance. nificance are extracted, preserved, or used in a (m) Residential structures shall not exceed manner commensurate with their importance. 35 feet in height. [Ord. 11-00§5(5.160)] (c) The establishment, restoration, or revi- talization of historical, archaeological, scientific, 18.25.420 Scientific and educational facilities. or educational facilities shall be done in such a (1) Definition.Those sites,structures,or facili- manner that would cause minimal disturbance to ties that provide unique insight into our natural or adjacent properties as well as natural features of cultural heritage. the shoreline. [Ord. 11-00§5(5.170)1 (2) Policies. (a) Jefferson County and the city of.Port 18.25.430 Shore defense works. Townsend should consult with the Washington (1) Definition. Structures or modifications for State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preserva- the purpose of retarding shore erosion from wave tion and professional consultants to review pro- or current action, protecting channels and harbors posed project areas for potential valuable data and from wave action,encouraging deposition of beach to establish procedures for salvaging that data. materials, preventing stream bank overflow and (b) Where possible, sites should be perma- retaining uplands.They may consist of bulkheads, nently preserved for scientific study and public ob- seawalls,dikes,revetments,breakwaters,jetties,or servation.In areas known to contain archaeological gabions.Defense works are commonly constructed data,special conditions should be attached to sub- from quarry rock(rip-rap),treated wood,concrete, stantial development permits to provide for site in- steel,and sand and gravel. spections and an evaluation of an archaeologist to (2) Prohibited Uses and Activities. ensure that archaeological data is properly sal- (a) Shore defense works on spits, hooks, vaged. bars,barrier beaches,or similar accretion terminals (c) Developers should notify Jefferson or accretion shore forms. County or the city of Port Townsend, as the case (3) Policies. may be, if any possible archaeological data is un- (a) Bulkheads and seawalls should be covered during excavations in the shoreline area. located and constructed in such a manner that will (d) Jefferson County and the city of Port not result in adverse effects on nearby beaches and Townsend should work toward lending integrity to will minimize alterations of the natural shoreline. the Natural Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and (b) Shore defense works should be con- the Washington State Parks and Recreation Com- structed in such a way that would minimize dam- mission Act (Chapter 43.51 RCW) and provide age to fish and shellfish habitats. Open poling wherever possible for the protection,rehabilitation, construction is preferable in lieu of the solid type. restoration, and reconstruction of districts, sites, (c) The effect of a proposed bulkhead on buildings, structures, and objects significant in public access to publicly owned shorelines should American, Washington State, or local history, be considered. architecture,archaeology,or culture. (d) Shore defense works should be designed (e) Excavation of Indian artifacts shall be to blend with the surroundings and not to distract conducted in compliance with the Washington from the aesthetic qualities of the shorelines. State Archaeological Sites and Resources Act (e) The construction of bulkheads should be (Chapter 27.53 RCW). permitted only where they provide protection to up- (f) Excavation activities shall be conducted land areas or facilities,not for the indirect purpose in compliance with the applicable policies and of creating land by filling behind the bulkhead. standards of this master program. Landfill operations should satisfy related perfor- (3) Performance Standards. mance standards. (a) No development or substantial develop- (f) Floating breakwaters are preferred to ment shall be undertaken with regard to a site or solid landfill types in order to maintain sand move- structure that has probable historical,scientific, or ment and fish habitats. archaeological significance until an evaluation of (g) Solid breakwaters should be constructed the site or structure has been made by an authority only where design modifications can eliminate judged competent in such matters by Jefferson potentially detrimental effects on the movement of County or the city of Port Townsend. sand and circulation of water. 18-153 (Revised 10/01) 18.25.440 LVv i i CiVt (h) The restriction of the public use of the wise divert the direction FA t7a-€k 4nl f i' e s. . water surface as a result of breakwater construction works have been professionally engineered and • must be recognized and must be considered in analyzed to ensure the diversion will not cause granting shoreline permits for their construction. cross-stream or downstream impacts nor adversely (i) The effect proposed jetties or groins have alter the characteristic of the river or stream. [Ord. on sand movement must be considered.Provisions 11-00§5(5.180)] should be make to compensate for the adverse effects of the structures either by artificially trans- 18.25.440 Transportation facilities. porting sand to the downdrift side on an inlet with (1) Definition. Passageways for motorized ve- jetties, or by artificially feeding the beaches in the hides or trains, including but not limited to such case of groins. devices as bridges,trestles,ramps,or culverts. (j) Special attention should be given to the (2) Policies. effect these structures will have on wildlife propa- (a) Whenever feasible, major highways, gation and movement,and to the effects these struc- freeways, and railroads should be located away tures will have on the aesthetic quality of the shore- from shorelands, except in port and heavy indus- line. _ trial areas,so shore roads my be reserved for slow (k) Rip-rapping and other bank stabilization moving recreational or residential traffic. measures should be located, designed, and con- (b) Roads located in wetland areas should structed to avoid the need for channelization and to be designed and maintained to prevent erosion and protect the natural character of the stream. to permit a natural movement of ground water. (1) Where flood protection measures such as (c) All debris, overburden, and other waste dikes are planned,they should be placed landward materials from construction should be disposed in of the stream, including associated swamps and such a way to prevent their entry by erosion from marshes and other wetlands directly interrelated drainage,high water,or other means into any water and interdependent with the stream proper. body. (m) Flood protection measures that result in (d) Road locations should be planned to fit channelization should be avoided. the topography so alterations of natural conditions (4) Performance Standards. will be minimized. (a) Shore defense works shall be designed (e) Scenic corridors with public roadways and constructed in a manner that causes an absolute should have provisions for safe pedestrian and minimum of interruption to naturally occurring other nonmotorized travel.Also,provisions should shoreline processes. be made for sufficient view points,rest areas, and (b) Shore defense works shall be designed picnic areas in public shorelines. and constructed to minimize interruption of fish (f) Extensive loops or spurs of old highways movements as well as marine and wildlife habitats. with high aesthetic quality should be kept in ser- (c) Shore defense works shall not be used vice as pleasure by-pass routes, especially where for the indirect purpose of creating landfills,unless main highways paralleling the old highway must such landfill is specifically permitted in oomph- carry large traffic volumes of high speed. ance with landfill performance standards of this (g) Since land use and transportation facili- master program. ties are so highly interrelated, the plans for each (d) Shore defense works shall be designed should be coordinated. and constructed to harmonize insofar as practicable (h) Waterway crossings should be designed with the aesthetic characteristics of the area where and constructed to maintain normal geohydraulic they are located. processes, as well as to minimize interruption of (e) Shore defense works such as dikes shall floodwater flow. be located landward of the stream and associated (i) Transportation facilities should assure swamps,backwaters,marshes,floodway and other the continued and unobstructed movement of sedi- 1 wetlands directly interrelated and interdependent ments. with the stream proper. (j) The number of waterway crossings (f) Substantial development permit applica- should be minimized. lions shall provide competent technical evidence (3) Performance Standards. that the proposed shore defense structure will per- (a) When feasible,major highways and rail- form as designed. roads shall be located away from the shoreline. (g) Shore defense works along rivers and (b) Whenever possible, roads shall be lo- streams shall not include groins or jetties or other- cated on natural benches,ridge tops,or other areas (Revised 10/01) 18-154 ox � JEFFERSOUNTY •• LO9 ITEM \o `' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 360/379-4450. 360/379-4451 Fax Pdg6 _Of i `So www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Tax Parcel Number: Property Size: (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Property Owner(s)of Record: Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies 0 Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit 0 Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family 0 Garage Attached/Detached 0 Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]*" ❑ Manufactured Home .0 Modular - ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification I 0 Commercial* 0 Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑ Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan"* ❑ Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign - 0 Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** D Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions-- ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* 0 Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staff's access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the application that he or she wants prior notice. Signature: Date: The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and Could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the tederal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: Date: 113444CT D T C 41414\roan r~nu mC\C,,..P.,r nu n A.,nt:ror:,,.,S_70_11A Ant- BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: LOG ITEM GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: V t c EMAIL> . f MAILING ADDRESS: : Pa9e___._1 k _o-__ --��--. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: I Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: O New ❑ Wood Existing: I ❑ Sewer O Addition 0 Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel 0 Concrete Total: Height: 0 Individual System 0 Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# O Demolition ❑ Other Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well 0 Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: ' If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No ' If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: i Underground Tank i Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: f Heat Stove I Cook Stove i Woodstove i Fireplace Insert i Hot Water Tank i Pellet Stove i Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,ell-property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed fi�raffioe User = P t et it Main Floor Heated EH Bld App Review: 22 Floor Heated Consistency Review: Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine —, Additional Section: Heated Basement Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: • Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport SUBTOTAL — Decks 911/Rd Approach fee: Other TOTAL: $ Receipt Number: Cash/Check Number: ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Initials: G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Forms\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • r • 2 O O AGENCYijSEQNLY ITEM LuG US army corps Date received: # WASHINGTON STATE � DsC„. Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Page 12- of Application (DARPA) Form (help} Agency reference#: USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BELOW. Tax Parcel#(x): Part 1—Project Identification Unique project information that makes it easy to identify. (help] 9a. Unique Project Identifier Number(UPI#) [help} • Don't have one yet?Get one at htto://mo W.epermitting.Wa.gov or call the Washington Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800)917-0043. lb. Project Name(Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help] Part 2—Applicant The person or organization legally responsible for the project. (helps 2a. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization(if applicable) 2b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 2c. City, State, Zip 2d. Phone(1) 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2g. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note:Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b. of this application.) [help} 3a. Name(Last,First,Middle) and Organization (if applicable) 3b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 3c. City, State,Zip 3d. Phone(1) .3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3g. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) IA DOA)nrO Pano 1 of 11 Part 4—Property Owner(s) [help]• • Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. [help] n Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) n Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. LOG ITEM 4a. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) # ofJ 4b. Mailing Address(Street or Po Box) 4c. City, State, Zip 4d. Phone(1) 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4g.-i~-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. Ihelpl There are multiple properties or project locations (e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional property. 5a. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5n.) their)] 5b. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town,provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] 5c. County [help] 5d. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help) 1/4 Section. Section Township Range.... . 5e. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [telpl • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long 5f. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [hetpl • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 5g. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] I I State Owned Aquatic Land I I Tribal LJ Private H Other publicly owned (federal,state,county, city, special districts like schools, ports,etc.) JARPA 2009 Page 2 of 11 • • 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. (If you,need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) itIgM Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) LOG ITEM Page, .__of UL 5i: Is,any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? ft,41 (l Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 5j. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. e1 s 5k. Describe how the property is currently used. bog 51.'Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. {he►pl 1 nnnn nnnn • • 5m. Describe the structures (above and below ground)on the property, including their purpose(s). [heir)] LOG ITEM r Page 'I 5 of_ _ 5n. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. "beryl Part 6—Project Description fia. Summarize-the overall project You can provide more detail in 6d tul 6b. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply.) n Commercial n Residential [ Institutional ❑ Transportation n Recreational Maintenance n Environmental Enhancement fic. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check:all that apply.) ei ; ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Road n Bank Stabilization n Dam/Weir I I Geotechnical Survey I I Scientific Measurement Boat House ❑ Dike/Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Device ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch n Marina/Moorage ❑ Stairs n Boat Lift ❑ Dock/Pier ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility Bridge I Dredging ❑ Outfall Structure I I Swimming Pool n Bulkhead ❑ Fence n Piling ❑ Utility Line Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal [ Retaining Wall (upland) Channel Modification ❑ Fishway n Other: JARPA 2009 Page 4 of 11 • S 6d. Describe how:you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used ,lhekti • ' Identify where each elenierat will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain LOG ITEM Page_ -_®f x.11. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction?(monthf.Wr) (hetpl • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,.use J, PA Attachment 1)to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: End date: n See JARPA Attachment D 6f Describe the purpose of the work and why y€ouwaor need toperforir t - 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. Theipi 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? (held( • #yes,list each agency providing funds. n Yes [ No ❑ Don't know Part 7-Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable IARPA 7009 Paoe 5 of 11 • • 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [halal I Yes (l No U Don't know 1TFM 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? Ihelel ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? !help] • If yes,submit the report,including data sheets,with the JARPA package. l Yes I I No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington 11'lletland Rating System? [heir)] • If yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. [f Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepareda mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts towetlands? fhelpT • If yes,submit the plan,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No (l Not applicable 7g. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland that wviil be impacted,,,the extent and duration of the impact; and type and amount of compensatory mtttgaton proposed, )f you are submitting a compensatory mitigation plan with a similar table,you may simply state(below)where we can find this information in the mitigation plan. thtlnl Activity causing .. Wetland type Impact area Duration Proposed Wetland impact(fill, and rating (sq. ft. or acres) of impact2 mitigation mitigation area drain, excavate, category' e3 typ (sq. ft. or acres) flood, etc.) 1 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 2 Indicate the time(in months or years,as appropriate)the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 3 Creation (C), Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R), Enhancement(E), Preservation(P), Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7h. For all filling activities identified in 7g.,describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. ihelul 71. For all excavating activities identified in 7g., describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. thellol JARPA 2009 Page 6 of 11 • • 7j. Summarize what the compensatory mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. ihelol LOG ITEM Page 7' of1 Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] I I Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. 4 [1 Not applicable 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a-waterbody, theta] ❑ Yes n No 8c. Summarize impacts)to each waterbody in the table below. thelpj Activity causing Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area(sq. ft. or impact(clear, name location' of impact2 to be placed in or linear ft.)of dredge, fill, pile removed from waterbody drive, etc.) waterbody directly affected 'Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 2 Indicate the time(in months or years,as appropriate)the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8d. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterb odies? 1pl • if yes,submit the plan with the DARPA package. n Yes ❑ No n Not applicable 8e. Summarize what the compensatory mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • if you already completed 7j.,you do not need to restate your answer here. {helps JARPA 2009 Pane 7 of 11 8f. For all activities identified in 8c., scribe the source and nature of the fill Iterial, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. (help! LOG ITEM #__________t_______ Page ofJ 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities,identified in 8c.,describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. lhelo Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. lheipl Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact ( ) ( ) ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d)List? tilgjpi • If yes,list the;parameter(s)below. • If you don't know,use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: l :/N/w .ec~Yr:wa,n rftuoArarns t c1/. 1 Yes I I No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code(HUC)is the project in? (help) • Go to httpi/cfpub eoa.gov/surfttocate/i x.cfm to help identify the HUC. 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number 2RA#)is the project in? (help} • Go to ht tp;//whor,ecv.wa.cov/serv4oessais/r psiwria/wria.htrn to find the MIA-#. I I I JARPA 2009 Page 8 of 11 • 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? el LOG ITEM • Go to http_IIwww.ecv.wa.aov/oroorar slwalswpstcriteria.htm1 for the standards. [171 Yes ( I No I I Not applicable • ! M 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act,what is the local shoreline environment designation? fhelpl • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to:http:f{ nrw.ecv .govlprosiramslsealsmailaws rules/173-26/211 .desigrnations.html. I Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic I-7 Conservancy ❑ Other, 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? fhetp1 • Go to :i/wviw,dnr.wa.00vl usinessPermits Topics/Forest'racticesAppllcations/Pasres/fo vvatartvpina.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. I IF nNp UNs 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? fleipl • if no,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ❑ Yes n No Name of manual: 91. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. Ihelol III 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological)survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If yes,attach it to your JARPA package. I I Yes I I No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. fhetpl 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] JARPA 2009 Pane 9 of 11 Part 10—Identify the Permitlou Are Applying For • LOG ITEM Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. # • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. Page (�f • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or helpora.wa.gov. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental.Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply.) lhelol • For more information about SEPA,go to v r.ecv.r aovl ogr#Ris a/set /e=review htt is ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ❑ A SEPA determination is pending with (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 10b.) • Submit the Fish Habitat Enhancement Project form with this application. The form can be found at http://www.epermittinq.wa.gov/Portals/ JarpaResourceCenterrmages/default/fishenhancement.doc ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? n Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. !help! 1 t1b.. indicate the permits you are applying for. *that app •) fft*. LOCAL.GOVERMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ( ( Substantial Development n Conditional Use ❑ Variance n Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: I Floodplain Development Permit LI Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: I I Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Resources Use Authorization FEDERAL OCIVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S.Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) n Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: n General Bridge Act Permit I I Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA 2009 Page 10 of 11 . . Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. LOG ITEM Page_ ` or i- lia. Applicant Signature (required) Inelpl I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Applicant Date 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature Ihelpi I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authorized Agent Date 11c. Property Owner Signature(if not applicant) [help] I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick, scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA). People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 .IARPA 2009 Paoe 11 of 11 • • � ¢,�ox c°��, JEFFERSON COUNTY al '-3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4, 0'S 621 Sheridan Street•• Port Townsend ••Washington 98368 LOG ITEM `SS OS 360/379-4450 — 360/379-4451 Fax # www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Page 0 f1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable) G:\PermitCenter\#i4#FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to orEcmestg4. with this proposal? If yes, explain. uVV II EM Page o f 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page i LOG ITEM b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Page of c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • 2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. LOG ITEM 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed dfroor ---+ __.®f surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page• • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: LOG ITEM deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Page cz 1 of shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. G\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS SERA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page. • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, LOG ITEM generally describe. Page of c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation,other)? 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. G:\PermitCenter't##FORMS#kk\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • c. Describe any structures on the site. LOG ITEM d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low- income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: G:\PermitCenter\ii##FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what iL JG ITEM principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Page �'t:, o b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? —��-- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: G\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • LOG ITEM 14. Transportation Pa e4j_of a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. • G:\PermitCenterl###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • LOG ITEM 16. Utilities ��ge a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE • The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: G:\PermitCenterl###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • LOG ITEM TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR Pages'1�f AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS �7 `. '/ (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: G:\PermitCenterl###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?LOG ITEM of Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: 7. Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS#f#t\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page • • c�ONc w °�, JEFFERSON COUNTY LOG ITEM W ,.. 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �,,� 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 Page (� O/ (360) 379-4450 - (360)379-4451 Fax -�-t SANG http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template "Medium" and "Large" Projects [Includes Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)and Permanent Stormwater Control Plan] The submittal template for a Stormwater Site Plan has been developed from information presented in the Department of Ecology 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Manual), which is the set of stormwater management standards for new development and redevelopment in Jefferson County. The Stormwater Site Plan, Minimum Requirement #1 in the Manual, is the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary to evaluate a proposed new development or redevelopment for compliance with stormwater requirements. A Stormwater Site Plan is required for all "medium" and "large" projects. (For background information, refer to the Stormwater Management Information Sheet.) The Stormwater Site Plan includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP - Minimum Requirement#2) that addresses sediment and erosion control during construction and a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan that addresses stormwater on the project site in its developed condition through dispersion, infiltration, or, if necessary, flow control and/or treatment facilities. The steps for preparing and the content of a Stormwater Site Plan are summarized below and more fully described in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the Manual. The attached submittal template is intended to be a format applicable to typical rural residential construction. For these cases, completion and submittal of the template results in a complete land use application. THE TWO MAIN COMPONENTS OF A STORMWATER SITE PLAN I. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan A Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a document that describes the potential for pollution problems on a construction project and which explains and illustrates the measures to be taken to control these problems. The basis for requiring a SWPPP, the twelve elements required to be in a SWPPP, the suggested step-by step procedure to follow, and the suggested Best Management Practices (BMPs) to follow, are all described in Volume II of the Manual. A SWPPP consists of two sections, a narrative and the drawings. A description of the contents of the narrative and the drawings sections, and checklists for each of these sections, are in Section 3.3 of Volume II. For typical rural residential projects, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet to assist with the preparation of the Construction SWPPP. II. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan A Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is a document that describes the basis for, and the means of implementing, permanent Best Management Practices (BMPs)for flow control and treatment facilities after the project is completed. The content of a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is described in Section 3.1.5 of Volume I of the Manual. The permanent BMPs and facilities for flow control and treatment are described in Volumes Ill, IV, and V of the Manual. The submittal template is intended for rural residential projects that can fully disperse or infiltrate stormwater. The template may not be appropriate or sufficient for applications involving larger or more complex projects. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 1 • Lip ITEM Page � of I . INSTRUCTIONS To prepare a Stormwater Site Plan, follow the steps outlined below, complete the Stormwater Site Plan template, sign and submit together with the Master Land Use Application (MLA). This information may also be provided on other diagrams, plans, studies, or attachments submitted with the project application. If so, please indicate such on this supplemental permit application. As the template is designed mostly for rural residential development, it may not be as useful for a larger project as an independently prepared Stormwater Site Plan. For any particular project, the Administrator may waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of the application. Note: Prior to filling out the submittal template, read through these steps for preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. Preliminary or draft versions of the individual components may be helpful in the case that redesigning an original layout would result in a proposal that has less environmental impacts and is significantly simpler in terms of meeting stormwater requirements. For example, if the proposal can utilize the "full dispersion"BMP(T5.30 in the Manual), there is no need to provide for flow control or flow treatment on the site. For more information on the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements, refer to the "Low Impact Development"Information Sheet. BMPs used during the construction phase and that are included in the Construction SWPPP may also be useful as elements of the Permanent Storm water Control Plan. STEP 1: COLLECT AND ANALYZE INFORMATION ON EXISTING CONDITIONS Collect and review information on existing site conditions, including topography, drainage patterns, soils, ground cover, critical areas, adjacent areas, existing development, existing stormwater facilities. The Jefferson County website provides an Internet Map Server (IMS)function(http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us). If available,a Development Review Division(DRD) planner may be able to assist you in collecting this information. Analyze the information to determine site limitations, including: • Areas with high potential for erosion and sediment deposition(based on soil properties,slope,etc.); • Locations of sensitive and critical areas (e.g., vegetative buffers, wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, geologically hazardous areas,streams,susceptible aquifer recharge areas,etc.);and • The natural receiving waters to which the stormwater runoff either directly or eventually discharges. This information will be useful in site design and in the completion of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan and Construction SWPPP. STEP 2: PREPARE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT Based upon the analysis of existing site conditions,locate the buildings,driveways, roads,parking lots,and landscaping features for the proposed development. Consider the following points when laying out the site: • Fit development to the terrain to minimize land disturbance; confine construction activities to the least area necessary and away from critical areas; • Preserve areas with natural vegetation(especially forested areas)as much as possible; • On sites with a mix of soil types, locate impervious areas over less permeable soil (e.g., till) and try to restrict development over more porous soils(e.g.,outwash); • Cluster buildings together; • Minimize impervious areas;and • Maintain and utilize the natural drainage patterns. The preliminary development layout will assist in determining threshold discharge areas for calculating whether size thresholds under Minimum Requirements#6, #7, and#8 (for"large" projects) are exceeded and as a basis for the drawings and maps required for the Stormwater Site Plan. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 2 • • STEP 3: PERFORM AN OFF-SITE ANALYSIS This step is for "large" projects (i.e., adding 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, co v f pervious surfaces to lawn or landscaped areas, or converting 2%acres of forested area to pasture)at the discret inistrator. See Volume I,Section 2.6.2 for more information. Page of NI STEP 4: REVIEW THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS The Stormwater Calculation Worksheet is a required submittal for all development and redevelopment land use applications. Completing the Worksheet helps determine the broad category of the proposal—"small," "medium," or "large" project—and the applicable Minimum Requirements. "Small" projects need to meet Minimum Requirement#2 only. "Medium" projects need to meet Minimum Requirements#1 through#5. "Large" projects need to meet all the Minimum Requirements,#1 through#10. The Minimum Requirements are as follows: 1. Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans(Chapter 3 of Manual) 6. Runoff Treatment 2. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 7. Flow Control 3. Source Control of Pollution 8. Wetlands Protection 4. Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls 9. Basin/Watershed Planning 5. On-site Stormwater Management 10. Operation and Maintenance The Manual provides descriptions and instructions in Volume I,Chapter 2. Information sheets,application materials,and DRD planners can help describe the Minimum Requirements to applicants. Note: "Large" projects, as part of meeting Minimum Requirements #6 – Runoff Treatment – and #7 – Flow Control, are compared to Volume I, Chapter 2 in the Manual to determine whether on-site stormwater management BMPs are sufficient or treatment facilities or flow control facilities are required. The flow control determination may necessitate use of the Western Washington Hydrology Model managed by the Department of Ecology. Consult Sections 2.5.6 and 2.5.7 of Volume 1, Chapter 2 of the Manual for more information. Again, the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements is to design the project so that natural drainage is preserved, impervious surface is limited, and full dispersion (BMP T5.30) is implemented. By using "low impact development"techniques in the site design, the need for treatment and flow control facilities is eliminated, simplifying preparation of the Stormwater Site Plan and often the site construction process itself. For more information on these techniques,consult the"Low Impact Development"Information Sheet. STEP 5: PREPARE A PERMANENT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Select stormwater control BMPs and facilities that will serve the project site in its developed condition. The selection process is presented in Volume I, Chapter 4. After consideration is given to how selected BMPs and facilities fit within and serve the entire preliminary development layout, the designer may want to reconsider the site layout to reduce the need for construction of facilities or the size of the facilities by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces created and increasing the areas to be left undisturbed. The Permanent Stormwater Control Plan should contain the following sections(Section 3.1.5 of Volume I,Chapter 3): • Existing Site Hydrology(i.e.,the behavior of water on the site—above,below,and on the ground) • Developed Site Hydrology (special requirements for projects and threshold discharge areas within projects that requirement treatment and flow facilities) • Performance Standards and Goals • Flow Control System • Water Quality System • Conveyance System Analysis and Design Essentially, in terms of site hydrology, the developed condition of the site should match the pre-developed condition, with is forested land cover (unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement). For "large" projects, totals of impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution generating pervious surfaces must be tabulated for each threshold discharge area for which on-site BMPs are the sole stormwater management approach. stormwater site plan template—rev.10(2112008 3 :OGiy • Page C' STEP 6: PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP for projects adding or replacing 2,000 square feet of impervious surface or more or clearing 7,000 square feet or more (i.e., "medium" or"large" projects), must contain sufficient information to demonstrate to the UDC Administrator that the potential pollution problems have been adequately addressed for the proposed project. An adequate Construction SWPPP includes a narrative and drawings. The narrative is a written statement to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for a particular project. The narrative contains concise information concerning existing site conditions, construction schedules, and other pertinent items that are not contained on the drawings. The drawings and notes describe where and when the various BMPs should be installed, the performance the BMPs are expected to achieve, and actions to be taken if the performance goals are not achieved. There are 12 Elements that must be considered in the development of a Construction SWPPP, unless site conditions render that element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly justified in the narrative. The 12 Elements cover the general water quality protection strategies for limiting site impacts during construction and are described in detail in Section 2.5.2, Volume I of the Manual. The 12 Elements of Minimum Requirement#2,Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention,are: 1. Mark Clearing Limits 5. Stabilize Soils 9. Control Pollutants 2. Establish Construction Access 6. Protect Slopes 10. Control De-watering 3. Control Flow Rates 7. Protect Drain Inlets 11. Maintain BMPs 4. Install Sediment Controls 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets 12. Manage the Project For ease of use, the Stormwater Site Plan submittal template below includes a section that lists the 12 Elements and provides the opportunity to include sufficient information for rural residential and other relatively simple Construction SWPPPs. For more complex projects, a separate narrative and set of plans may be preferred or required. Volume II of the Manual is dedicated to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. A step-by-step BMP selection process and a complete description of the BMPs applicable to each element is provided in Chapters 3 and 4. Additionally, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet that summarizes the 12 Elements and excerpts from the Manual sample sediment and erosion control measures for typical rural residential development. The Packet should prove useful for completing the Construction SWPPP component of the submittal template. On construction sites that infiltrate all stormwater runoff,the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is the protection of the infiltration facilities from fine sediments during the construction phase and protection of ground water from other pollutants. On construction sites that discharge to surface water, the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is compliance with the State Water Quality Standards. The step-by-step procedure outlined in Volume II, Section 3.2 is recommended for the development of these Construction SWPPPs. STEP 7: COMPLETE THE STORMWATER SITE PLAN The Stormwater Site Plan encompasses the entire submittal to Jefferson County in conjunction with a land use or building permit application. The following documents or sections should be included: • Project Overview • Existing Conditions Summary • Off-site Analysis Report(if required;usually for"large"projects) • Permanent Stormwater Control Plan • Special Reports and Studies(such as soil testing,wetland delineation, etc., if applicable) • Other Permits(approvals required by other regulatory agencies that include stormwater management conditions) • Operation and Maintenance Manual(for each flow control and treatment facility, if applicable) • Bond Quantities Worksheet (for performance bond or other financial guarantee for proper construction and operation of construction site BMPs and permanent drainage facilities, if required) The submittal template below is designed for rural residential and other relatively small or simple projects. For larger and more complex projects—particularly those that involve stormwater treatment and/or flow control—more information may be required and an independent Stormwater Site Plan may be the preferable submittal format. STEP 8: CHECK COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS A Stormwater Site Plan as designed and implemented should specifically fulfill all Minimum Requirements applicable to the project. The applicant should review to check that these requirements are satisfied and that all information provided is true and correct prior to signing and submitting the Stormwater Site Plan. (The signature box appears at the end of the submittal template.) stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 4 S • 49,01N6 N JEFFERSON COUNTY LOG ITEM ►-, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Page 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 ° 360/379-4450 . 360/379-4451 Fax ttINO http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if ap•Iicable,and indicate acreage of each. 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 5 • • 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. Page realm 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands, lakes,steep slopes,etc.). Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed(i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual) or, if not,what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. 12. Describe the flow control system. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 6 • • 13. Describe the water quality system. LOG ITFI\jl #' v _of 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. 15. Describe the source of fill material,physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included,list the Manuals here. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 7 • • CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, La �u rl with rural residential development. "ITEM SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE Pa e 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction S ents-leas- een or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at Volume II Section 3.2.3 of the Manual(beginning on page 3-7). 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP • 1. Mark Clearing Limits. 2. Establish Construction Access. II 3. Control Flow Rates. 4. Install Sediment Controls. 5. Stabilize Soils. 6. Protect Slopes. 7. Protect Drain Inlets. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 8 • • 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP(continued) LOG ITEM 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. 9. Control Pollutants. 10. Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs). 12. Manage the Project. 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads). b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 9 • • b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. LOG ITEM Page...44_ 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g.,erodibility,settleability,permeability,depth,texture,soil structure). 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence b. Construction phasing(if proposed) 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following,if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/200S t0 it • • SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan,a stormwater site plan,and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. LOG ITEM a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. b. North arrow. c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines,pasture areas, etc.). d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries(if applicable). f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales, interceptor trenches,or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches,or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades,dimensions, and direction of flow in all ditches, swales,culverts and pipes. e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s), pond(s),pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth,length,and width dimensions. d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe,and/or other filtering devices. f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s),if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g.,concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 11 • • Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems,treatment facilities,flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs),the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan,(:: eui* �n the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that a r the project as constructed. Page I of APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 12 \)/(14`v"." - r () • # Page jofo; (I ITEM: Olympic Terrace II Phase II—DW1 PLA is requesting an "abbreviated" approval for OTII Phase II claiming that the HE decision for Phase I already approved them for 80 lots of which only 41 were actually platted. Decision: Read the HE decision and see if he made any stipulations for this. See what was actually approved. Otherwise they will have to go through the long plat process just like Ludlow Cove II. ITEM: Oyster House discontinued non-conforming use 901182035—CZ 1) Mr. Houser questioned if his non conforming use is discontinued. He has been out of the country serving in the military. He believes that the time he spent out the country cannot count towards the discontinuation of his non-conforming use. 2)The parcel that surrounds his parcel is owned by Trendwest condominiums. Trendwest is a non-conforming use. Trendwest at this time cannot buy his parcel but would like the restaurant to reopen. Could an expansion of Trendwest non-conforming use be applied to his parcel and reopen the restaurant? He would retain ownership of the parcel with the restaurant. Decision: 1) He would have to supply documentation of when the restaurant use was discontinued. He would need to supply the information that would exempt him from the JCC requirement while he was serving in the military. 2) He may apply for a Code Interpretation regarding the expansion of a non-conforming use with different ownership and not on the same parcels. ITEM: SPAAD application that requires a septic wet season evaluation. Will they be vested? CZ Decision: SPAAD is vested by the determination of completeness 28 days JCC 18.40.110(1). ITEM: Home business- Dan Titterness-902234012—CZ Is it possible for a COU on this parcel for a roofing supply company? Would this roofing company be considered a home business? Decision: Supply documentation of when the existing home business was discontinued. Send Dan JCC 18.20.200 Home Business to see if his proposal meets the criteria of the JCC. (; ITEM: Permit process for a reinforced earth buttress within SMP& CAO-601032020-CZ Decision: Proposal may be located within SMP from geo tech site plan but it is hard to tell. The � proposal would be a SDP permit and a pre-app is required. Submit with pre-app a site plan ' _ \ identifying the location of the proposed bulkhead, buttress and the OHWM. ITEM: Passive-aquaculture business leaving shells on beach-701304012—CZ �� V Neighbors have passive an aquaculture business. They are storing the shells on the beach N,�� which has created quite a stink. The trucks on the easement road are a problem also. .:1/�1 Decision: File a complaint with Jefferson County. Check with WDFW on the aquatic farm and 01„��<e- DNR for permits and any requirements that they may have. • Admin 1Cp't as aAasiiiiiiiiiiRnift- 'W-1 A pei MM . � , ,. jy'-�+ bd! Yd rt,°\ a' „ 6 ,,,,, la t IL .�a 4,' 41466 . ., , ' V,:iL ' '<, Syr , ..„..1.. f**416,, 1; . <VP *cook, 4th...... a .:1''''' t - T.c ,`' p2 , 3F k� �a.ai„,A.0°o�biao 3”- .AP H 0 a� aF $ o b .. m ;'v > M Sue / `4� �_•� agg fille' 1:1 I ,,„ ili 4,... ip ..1.; If '.'. _y - , _ , ___,-----"\c----,\4,,,.:,.. a. . i\\/0 E rn .44',,.>",,'":„. \ it r ‘,\,,, t rte; 1 ... *. b /°~ t 'I11TliiiiiI : 1 ik.....;;Aft..,,,t,:v.,f;t42.tzl-k';,ri • . cn • ., \ z ir4 r., e 'a, ,a w♦�eae „e1ea�1 S • ♦ e .■II gg F`m j m .. "t'.., 4a‘ 0-,. g. 1• 6 m p , ;:, i „,,, ,,., , ..... . , _ , .._ . ___ s. , , , ., , E Z I .11 1 ,,,,., [ \ r 4 L.,0 i I f .e) .1 , , , , •, I I , . I '741, J ' `. L + �, . k m I I I I ` 1 =r� �`°, '—‘,,, -1.:". ''''''91 , .,'".!:,:>":.:''' .,-, ' a = 8# ! ! II . ¢Y I h i.''21 -r-,13-.\)',,, '''N.!..10.x.4/ ‘3)/#, ‘41C'4,-_,IP ':',, ed" --- R .' .1 u \ -.1.. . 1°1 , „,,,,, /\. 1 c., I 1g y I I ,,A \440. - 4 i ' a J!, it ' s. 5 ♦ r »L Z. )' ' � � a i # "bz' y�� ° , �4,11,4 J % '� �, � w3 bYk 9 a t ,. . iP, 045'1 „l &}rota a 4 �er� f' 1 ! Yv '1'14,';',r�'' I 111, i1 Y N xeK }µ rzp A J y, k 4 T f b lA 4 T' d C �?, et ax A a " r � �'� ,w a �� 1� «a "A',',#),, - i,, a w"� + a rs a h > k 3Ak 73 _ �•J �?34th':.. S I i{�p� v r..,lwrn.wq'� a ---//11------ f i ,,, .. _. mil. � D to m •� I --/// ' �� u ° t �r G*4 I � a H -; o in' ! xs e �, R to , X ! -x. 4 i4 3 lrr m I ,� I cn rA I i I I j i ,� 1 0. _ I j 1 h_ I I S,)I '11-i-:_ it 0 to i , ii 4� // i • a ° O:\GeoTech\080029 Adachi Landslide\2009-101080029.01.dwg OF CONSISTENCY REVIE. Project Planner: Master#PRE09-00034 Review Type Project Description PRE09-00034 BULKHEAD REPAIR Primary: SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE Site Address: LOG ITEM YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 1253 DEER CREEK RD 19223 34TH AVE S QUILCENE WA, 98376 SEATAC WA 98188-5313 REP SEALEVEL BULKEAD BUILDERS INC Page _O /,L PO BOX 375 KINGSTON WA 98346 Project Location: Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 Parcel Number: 601032020 S-T-R: 3-26N-01 W Total Acreag< 7 Legal Description S3 T26 R1W LOT 1(N1/4) SUBJ TO EASE V500/P97 Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 2 Planning Area: Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: i / School 48 Zoning: Pie COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag [ ] Shoreline Designation:6S)NO 44 i xV) ,(.J(tit p7,,( Shoreline Slope StabiliE Stream Type:YES NO Fish&WildlifevE , NoltA ,r�—.�6 , eGi 611~ J Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NO _ Seismic: YES NO Landslide: /Y...-s'' NO Flood: "YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Area E No SIPZ: none -.A t'ts' :igh Ri Coastal CMZ: in 'Mg' ''isk Mo.era e isk Disconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_ Land Disturbing Activity `' `� Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Fore ov [ ] Landscaping Required:Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other [ ] Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s)Size:- RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: — — — Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)& Condition(s):_ — Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: _ <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Id Ordinance Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO — [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES — Special Reports Scanned N/A YES — No parcel tags,found for parcel ` + y Associated CASES status iss finaled description 601032020 BLD95-00520 F 9/26/1995 12/7/1995 Garage SEP95-00383 F 1/23/1996 6/6/1996 NOW FILED W/SEP98-00255 CAR98-00226 F 11/30/1998 11/30/1998 mobile home installation SEP98-00255 F 5/18/1999 12/10/1999 SEP95-383 NOW FILED HERE BLD98-00504 F 5/20/1999 12/29/1999 single family residence PRE09-00034 P BULKHEAD REPAIR SOM98-00255 F BLD00-00047 F 1/20/2000 2/24/2000 PROPANE TANK INSTALLATION LOG ITEM Page I _1 'I ill i I .10114 .10.4.1.4UrlotelN i Kr-4 V IL W iiwittur te Time Comm-nts bci mit C., - • - I. e 411PAPER91171 - A A f 7. - • c)r.epave p e -afio pal() LO IIbM ....mammomposmommonorntavosomoramonon onwommoos...moraelon t • ■ • • • . • AW imu BULKHEAD BUILDERS April 15, A+-411 LOO ITEM Jefferson County Attn: Stacie Hoskins,Planning Manager Page 1 of 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 RE:Adachi Slope Stabilization,PRE09-00034 Ms.Hoskins, This letter serves as our formal request for an expedited review process for the above referenced project. Along with this letter we have provided the necessary requirements for the Shoreline Substantial Development Application,as requested in the Pre-Application Meeting letter from Donna Frostholm. The reason for this expedited request is brought to you as a result of Mr. Adachi's failing health. He has been extremely ill recently as this project has prepared for this submittal and appears to not be improving. As the main contact and organizer of the project for his family,Mr.Adachi is worried about not being able to complete the project himself and leaving it for the family to be concerned with. It would be greatly appreciated if you were able to route the project to a planner as soon as possible in hopes of getting the required timeline started for the approval process. We understand that the needed public noticing and requirement for the Hearing Examiner review are not available for expediting but that instead of the application sitting in queue to begin the lengthy permit process you may be able to have the initial steps of review started immediately. Again,we appreciate your consideration for expediting this permit process as much as you can. I want to thank you in advance for taking the time to address this written request and look forward to hearing from you. Should you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 360-297-2401 or sealevelbb @silverlink.net Best r-•. • Jennifer Rotsten Permit Manager,Officer Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. Cc: Yoko and Seiichi Adachi 2 ' LJsu P.O. Box 375, Kingston, Washington 98346 • (360) 297-2401 • Fax (360) 297-2308 N C06, . JEFFERSON•UNTY • LOG ITEM • t . th e D ITY DEVELOPMENT *4 tree • ownsend•Washington 98368 4. '. 51 Fax Page_ www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment k4ir C# Master Permit Application MLA: 10— l _ Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Cope-. Sk k;1i-t0-t-tcN- Tax Parcel Number: (00 1 u"S2„,0?f Property Size: (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Property Owner(s)of Record: S eI .Q I A)A-C.I Telephone: 2Olo —5 ?-L-f-- '+3,-1 Fax: email: Mailing Address: L ct 223 34 - Ave -S Se ki-a — ■.?A `( tit l—2313 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): SCaUCJI .tiK Oui '?t t it at.—es . 1AC• Telephone:3 ¢6'Z-`(>r - ut o k Fax: ?&O-Zq1 - 2...: 02 email: t l &l lee I∎ •Act-- Mailing Address: PO tb?( '''S- ►'\ys , WA-- c What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CI** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)*" ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan''"" ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes'Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration-- ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* SI Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre-Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DE IGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate c(pa"Q_l i to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE 5 �t e i 6 -�rt t' lc Date: L I i_u.u By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the appl on that he��oo�r she wants priori��L�ice�.. ` Signature: - -e�lc°/ .:i) C°—✓ Date: r/ /e The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfe le respon • ihty fo�d ring to complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this discla' and signs and dates it below. r-. Signature: i E - Date: .)--//C'" G:\PemmitCenter\###FORMS#lt#\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • • BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the respo sibility of the General Contract.r for the proposed project. Signature: : . ,. �% Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: N ) Li ) ITEM MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTORS LICENSE WAINS Page .3 of NUMBER: NUMBER T ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: O New 0 Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# O Demolition 0 Other. Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well 0 Two Party Type of Heat ProposedTol 0 Public Name of System: If this is a Commercial Protect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: I Underground Tank I Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove I Fireplace Insert I Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, includin• the reserve area. S•uare Foo r e Current Pro•.sec 4 = ; t: f Main Floor Heated EH Bld App Review: 2""Floor Heated Consistency Review: �-j Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine Additional Section: Heated Basement Plan Check fee: brt 'C41. Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport fi . SUBTOTAL Decks 911/Rd Approach fee: $ Other TOTAL: $ r Receipt Number: Cash/Check Number: ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: 'Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish 00 Initials: G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc ,fig' ,�,,:... ,,_ !T .' ''�„�� Q LOG ITEM t t., 4d"-:',',.,'� � ''..4•-. . 1't"'''''',;'..: 4 c z A� z' Vi .z at .y > 4 t�f 4; k . 4ye Y+4 .�\ l ,yam . :• 4 ' s ,I d� L Lidi ^f`� �'Ty� V � 5. ': 4 rot t� ; ..-- .: '.:. 11"14",:-!..:* ''' '''‘-f'-'' . it'10.4 — ''' — ''' —.,..4— v ' t. k ' + _. _ � _V:-'7•.•.,,••��k ,�.�'. \ vr*}y aw... .�rT �-4^ t •y � .. k� , ry fib,. 'Y` • ..''':'''.7.' i 4 - fir' U.:. ..„ 4,i,!',..: t ys' ,-"3”, 3 .-„ , M ` - '-� , 'ri-T. ':•' y�► -.E`'h �°°. � �j F ug -:#e - �,n. iay ,y� =.t .$� !^� iµ¢N,st"'�' rx; sM>; r'• it f=,„;i....---y fit. w. ,; � ,e> ":,:i0.--'ri 001,7,4--� `.r +•\ *i' •y "f+,liK �s „-.„an�� i z" ,4401.e. - 4 Syr ¢ = �;, f - f -y i' � 41:4.4:5-. ..N7:;:.:..Ys " '"+;'�rar`r-1 '',...A.:',-,..;.-- .' b tf:" t r�;• +F & a1"^' 7 ',.{ f ri 'a5_,fic ' 'F 0,,"7I"s C _{ _ - 1�,71;,1.1' 14 g K. m •e i ^\.& a a , i= � ti [ , 11 , ., .;'. } Y s '`' '-'' % .` 'E f r �'eta �'. �«4 P yEX ��t ,^-S r g � �t,5 .iii. :` j ."4€ $'' -"t "� -. v*` a � y ,' "P.:-'. .e r :, .:. e -. 'tea a t 3 1J ctt ■ 5 s '''''."0:..i':- c;ON' .-, "5-' k s� '. 4 . .. 9 4. '�' `+. iR j k,-k:n 'J A' 13Y J r k �� :.0 .(. f 'C� £t�f ���<r •' �� ��tip' ,.`4 �k{ �'r ,4. �;. '' �, .\y�+.' r sir Y° .i` '�^'� 'it , yy - • ( •'1 tf 7 -'Y` L`�.. 'f ,1' , < r •J S!q s ,:,,} ice ♦k�". .(. • ' • JEFFERSON COUNTY' s DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 LOG ITEM '„ O` 360/379-4450 • 800/831-2678 • 360/379-4451 Fax 6Z_ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Adachi Landslide Repair 2. Name of applicant: Sei Adachi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner: Sei Adachi 19223 34th Ave S. Seatac, WA 98188 (206)824-3734 Contact:Sealevel PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360)297-2401 4. Date checklist prepared: `` :' 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable) To begin as soon as possible and be completed all at once. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page l • • 7. Pa you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity L.e tirrrgew ected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No Page Le (af 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical report prepared by Aspect Consulting 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. Do not know 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Grading and building permits, Jefferson Co. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Landslide repair to include a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on slope. Approx 1420 yards of sand and 110 tons of rock will be installed. Geo-grid will be installed, spacing as per plans. Please see plans and geo-tech report for more detail. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 1253 Deer Creek Rd Quilcene, WA Legal Desc: S3 T26 R1 W, Lot 1 (N1/4) SUBJ To Ease V500/P97 See attached plans B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Steep - see geo-tech report, SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 • LOG ITEM b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? 100% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay, sand,gravel, peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silty and clay d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, � et t describe. Yes, winter of 07-08 slide. S-kLI∎I'I ee Aov yeu I e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. 415-ti Indicate source of fill. Approx 1420 yards of sand will be brought to the site. Source unknown. To be approved by geo-tech. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so, generally describe. All necessary precautions will be taken, per County and geo-tech. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 5 0, ('L The project scope is to stabilize a recent slide and prevent future erosion. 041,wliea a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust,automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Machine exhaust during normal business hours. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Dabob Bay SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 • 2)Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the describedLo G �� waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. EM Yes, please see plans. 0"' Page t of r, 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. X c ( OCt V I) Unknown i A maf 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, 0 describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (� I Co,j V147;C No rea) �� Mk b. Ground: -1 • 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example:domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: All precautions from the geo-tech will be taken SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: LOG ITEM deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir,cedar, pine,other `` shrubs Page %Tt of grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only what is needed for construction c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. AO van lance mo ffea Unknown t,tA p;;0` �k- are C‘ try i �^ d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or ennance t v(� n, , o i'61 2 c T (Tel vegetation on the site, if any: Owner will re-plant slope 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: r-c t e-s tom m ml 6 stupid- birds: hawk, heron jab 4_4,.irds other: it , � (5 y mammals: deer, be- elk, beaver,other: DrD C Ur fish: bas m .aon rout,herd shellfis they: W jt,� * .ckA ust, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.t XV C t I Eagle, Salmon, orca c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None at this time 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: t-,pij ITEM None �— 4 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? None 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term �S or a long-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, operation,other)?Indicate what i i se erte hours noise would come from the site. a Machines during normal business hours 1 a IV 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: (t-t?(1Y None 8. Land and shoreline use epArtiia Cu a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 0� ,ty� Single Family Residences � • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 • • c. Describe any structures on the site. LO ITEM Owner's home # Page 11 of d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RR-5 uvet. y,� f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Re' t G 'it 1 ` RR-5 ;1) 1) 1 12 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? USt ' RR-5 Cori rVV 1 n l 5 U c, 5 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. 1, Yes, shoreline < FrOyCkarea. 15 life, thfaf i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ( '\'e,i 'tl N/A IN ' (i It (VC(040111 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 111140 rd 0 Ka((a N/A 041 0, , r k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: V L(�� meta N/A Q cea LOP I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses n � and plans, if any: pr0t �1 n N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low- income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 • LOG ITEM Page_ _0 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? V i e kc YO Y\x' None ern C,fan C 6' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: � 4A1).-00 I ‘ None L ' I'1 ES. 11. Light and glare 1U�1�`n ��,L'uIG� �u �a tvwsgt'6 hn irv�-QoLc . a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shoreline related b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. Unknown b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None at this time SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 • Laill ITEM Page ') 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the ,f 9 r existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. �`- L V L y\\131- vOaa tff Deer Creek Rd ? b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 • S LOG ITEM # 16. Utilities Page a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: it � ��``�t SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 • -- AGEtVV 1TE1VI 2 0 1 0 ` ., Date receive# WASHINGTON STATE Corps Page ID Ofg:2_ Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form' Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BELOW. Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [helpj2 Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2—Applicant The person or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) Seiichi Adachi 2b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2c. City, State, Zip Seatac, WA 98188-2313 2d. Phone(1) 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2g. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi @comcast.net Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b. of this application.) [help] 3a. Name (Last, First,Middle) and Organization (if applicable) Jennifer—Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, i Rotsten, Je , nc. 3b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 375 Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage_ESA • If you are applying for an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization you will need to fill out and submit an Application for Authorization to Use State- Owned Aquatic Lands form to DNR,which can be found at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/aqr_use_auth_app.doc • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you think you will need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they will accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias_resourcecenter/jarpaJarpa_form/9984/jarpa_form.aspx For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help@ora.wa.gov. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 1 of 13 3c. City, State, Zip Kingston, WA 98346 3d. Phone(1) 3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3g. E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 sealevelbb&O � ilhTr Part 4—Property Owner(s) Page 1 R EL Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. [help] ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. 4a. Name (Last, First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) 4b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4c. City, State, Zip 4d. Phone(1) 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4g. E-mail Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑There are multiple project locations (e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ❑ State Owned Aquatic Land (If yes or maybe,contact the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)at(360)902-1100) ❑ Federal ❑ Other publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools, ports, etc.) ❑ Tribal ® Private 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 1253 Deer Creek Rd. 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene, WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 2 of 13 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] LOG ITEM • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (NAD 83) 47'46'48.09" N/ 122 47'30.72"W 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) Jeffery & Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Alan & Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish, WA 98290 51. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] N/A 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] Deciduous & evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos enclosed. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 3 of 13 • • 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [help0 SFR LOO ITEM Page of af. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] SFR 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s). [help] Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [helps From Hwy 104, turn onto S Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd, follow for 8.5 miles, turn left onto Coyle Rd, and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road all the way to the water. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 4 of 13 Part 6—Project Descri tio• • P 6a. Summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6d. (help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. Approximately 1420 yards of sand and 110 tons of rock will be installed. Geo-grid xii0GrisPLIZIV1 spacing as per plans, see attached plans prepared by Aspect Consulting. 9°- Page lei 6b. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial E. Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6c. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Road ►/ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat House n Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Marina/Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier ❑ Mining n Stormwater facility ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Bulkhead 10 Fence ❑ Piling ❑ Utility Line ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal Ii Retaining Wall ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway (upland) ❑ Other: 6d. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. !help] • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain. As shown on the plans, the slope will be cleaned of all organics, logs and root wads will be salvaged and used along the toe of the MRE wall when completed. Loose material will be removed from the slide area. The new toe will be excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions. Layer specified geo-grid and compact material as directed by geo-tech. The rock armor on the top of the slope will be placed along a >1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5' where <1:1, 1-2 man size rock may be used. The construction road will be re- graded to approximately original grade and all drainage restored. Bare surfaces will be covered with temporary erosion control and native plantings completed for permanent erosion control along access and new reinforced slope. See plans for more details. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction? (month/year) (help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: Summer 2010 End date: +/-14 day duration ❑ See JARPA Attachment D JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 5 of 13 6f. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [help] A slide that occurred at the site during the winter of 2007-2008 removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The proposed work will restore and stabilize the slide area and prevent future slope instability. LOG ITEM Page d,b of& 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help/ $100,000.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes .1 No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If yes,submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] • If yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 6 of 13 7f. Have you prepared a mitiga• plan to compensate for any adverseSacts to wetlands? [heipi • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes El No ❑ Not applicable LOG ITEM Page o` a 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [help} 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted; the extent and duration of the impact; and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3lndicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h., describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [help JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 7 of 13 7j. For all excavating activities iden • in 7h., describe the excavation met , type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] LO ITEM Page •f �1 Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] ❑ Not applicable All work will be completed above the OHW line. Any work near the shoreline that requires access or close proximity to the shoreline will be completed at low tides. The proposed re-vegetation of the slope will enhance the habitat at the site. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help] ® Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help] • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Not applicable No mitigation plan has been prepared. The proposed native planting will restore the site to better than current conditions. Vegetation will not only assist in stabilizing the slope and providing long term erosion control, but also add shade and food to the beach environment. No further mitigation has been required or requested. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 8 of 13 8d. Summarize what the mitigati plan is meant to accomplish. Describlkw a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g.,you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] LOG ITEM N/A 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 impact3 to be placed in or linear ft.) of drive, etc.) removed from waterbody waterbody directly affected FILL Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-60' landward of OHW —Tif no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3lndicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e., describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [help] Fill will consist of+/- 1420 yards of approved sand, to be compacted to min 95% maximum of proctor std ASTM D-698/ Source unknown at this time. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e., describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] N/A JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 9 of 13 Part 9-Additional lnformatia • Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [helpl Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 April 15th, 2010 Department of Ecology Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [help] • If yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d/. LOG ITEM ❑ Yes ® No c Page_ }_of [ 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.govlsurf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecV.wa.g_ov/services/gis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecV.wa.qov/programs/wq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. y ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [helpi • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [helps • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits1 Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertvpinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial (l Non-Fish Seasonal JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 10 of 13 9h. Will this project be designed the Washington Department of bogy's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If no, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. I Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9L If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] SFR LOG ITEM Page ' of OD 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Salmon, bald eagle 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Unknown JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 11 of 13 Part 10—SEPA ComplianceSd Permits LOG ITEM Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. Page L - ofg17 • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or helpora.wa.qov. • For a list of agency addresses to send your application, click on the "where to send your completed JARPA" at http://www.epermitting.wa.gov. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) Ehelpl • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ®A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson County (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.)[help] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) Ihelpl LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: 1 Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: [' Aquatic Resources Use Authorization FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 12 of 13 . • • Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. LOG ITEM Page 7/ of 11a. Applicant Signature (required) hel I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoriz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) • W/ZA. Applicant Da e -SC+iC t Mckc)- 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Lillq lip Authoriz`#•ent ii i\v r ,')(.3-}W Date 11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [help] I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA). People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 .IARPA 2009 Page 11 of 11 • • • 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LOG ITEM 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 s 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax �4 http://www.coJ efferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Page o•f `�- Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MLA# g DiO 3 (I ()az PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: A p�-{„A,c DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small;"medium;or large.' The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction •with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(LE.,SITE) Size of parcel ,1 a- j cres An acre contains 43,580 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 3 D q,/5-7 —scot • Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results In movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography.. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared,graded,filled, • Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert%acres or more of Construction site for structures — V sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfteld,septic tank,etc. V' sgfft Circle: Yes Well,utilities,etc. -- 0 sq/ft Does the project convert 2'A acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. 22 a 0 sq/ft Circle: Yes No Lawn,landscaping,etc. 0 sq/ft „Ile p G Other compacted surface,etc. Z SO D sglft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 4 4 a' 0 sq/ft Cut 3_6 1 Fill 65'3 (cu/yd) '4L( sot? [over) • stormwater ceic worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 1 • impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,pack L pdotet irtls, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. !I �i �c�I�` ! STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE3�� , =�-r'f NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) '- sq/ft Structures(all roof area) /3 y 0 curotow Sidewalks ` sq/ft Sidewalks ?J sq/ft Patios — a sq/ft Patios p 2• i9 sq/ft Solid Decks ` 0 sq/ft Solid Decks a O sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) n Driveway,parking,roads,etc sgfft . Driveway,parking,roads,etc O sq/ft Other ...- sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New sq/ft Total Existing k "7 go sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* 6 7 f V sq/ft `This amount will be used to check totai lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stomiwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP)Best Management Practices(BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Sfonnwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein Is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. 9.411'.4 9(i611j0 (LANDO •-AUTHOR!-ED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) stormwater cat worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 2 • 0 ,/ LO : ITEM FIGURE 1 : NEW DEVELOPMENT Start Here Page T of i . Does the site have Yes See Redevelopment 35%or more of ■ Minimum existing impervious Requirements and coverage? Flow Chart (Figure 2) No_ Does the project convert 3/4 --- acres or more of native vegetation to lawn or Does the project add No landscaped areas, or 5,000 square feet or convert 2.5 acres or more ■ more of new of native vegetation to impervious surfaces? pasture? Yes Yes NNo_ Does the project have v 2,000 square feet or "LARGE" PROJECT more of new, replaced, All Minimum Requirements or new plus replaced apply to the new impervious impervious surfaces? surfaces and converted pervious surfaces. Yes No "MEDIUM" PROJECT Does the project have Minimum Requirements#1 land-disturbing through#5 apply to the new Yes activities of 7,000 and replaced impervious square feet or more? surfaces and the land disturbed. NO "SMALL" PROJECT See Minimum Requirement#2, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Based on Fig.2.2 from 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington • • LOG ITEM FIGURE 2: REDEVELOPMENT Page I of 2 Do the new,replaced, or new plus replaced impervious surfaces total 2,000 square feet or more? OR Does the land disturbing activity total 7,000 square feet or more? Yes No "MEDIUM"PROJECT "SMALL"PROJECT Minimum Requirements#1 through#5 Apply Minimum Requirement#2, apply to the new and replaced impervious Construction Stormwater Pollution surfaces and the land disturbed. Prevention Next Question • Does the project add 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surfaces? OR Convert 3/a acres or more of native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? OR Convert 2.5 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Yes No Next • • Q "LARGE"PROJECT Question ), Is this a road- Minimum Requirements#1 through#10 related project? apply to the new impervious surfaces Yes and the converted pervious surfaces. No Does the project add 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surfaces? Yes No • Do new impervious surfaces add 50%or Is the total of the new plus replaced more to the existing impervious surfaces impervious surfaces 5,000 square feet or within the project limits? more,AND does the value of the proposed improvements—including No Yes interior improvements—exceed 50% of • the assessed value (or replacement value) No additional of the existing site improvements? requirements Yes No No additional Minimum Requirements#1 through#10 requirements apply to the new and replaced impervious surfaces. Based on Fig.2.3 from 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington S Aspectconsulting earth+water LOG ITEM March 5,2010 Page— Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject: Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report Dated October 27,2008 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington Design of Slope Buttress Project No. 080029-002-01 Reference: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT, Landslide 2 Remediation-Adachi Property, 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008, prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Mr.Adachi: This addendum reflects a change in the design basis for the post-landslide conditions at your residence at 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove in Jefferson County, Washington. In the referenced original report,the site has been described and the geotechnical setting presented. The design recommendations presented in the report were for a proposed grade restoration for the original driveway along with toe buttress protection of the western portion north-facing slope. Since the presentation of the report, a determination has been made to temporarily move the driveway away from the landslide and that work has been completed.This temporary relocation has worked sufficiently that the need to re-establish grade for the alignment is no longer required. This addendum presents the design recommendations for a stabilizing buttress for the western end of the north-facing slope below the Adachi residence.Data presented in the original report are not repeated herein except where they add clarity. Description of Existing Slope Condition As shown on the revised Figure A, a mechanically reinforced earth(MRE) slope buttress will be used to prevent further sliding from the over steepened bluff slope to the north and northwest of the existing residence.This natural slope has developed into this geometry because of the long-term east-west landslide feature immediately to the north of the house. This last movement was the reason for the study for restoration of the driveway. The height of slope in the area of the buttress varies between 50 and 25 feet. The natural slope grade varies between 140 percent and 100 percent,respectively.Extensive colluvial movements were noted across the slope with jacked-straw trees and trees with large pistol butt curvatures indicative of surface movement.Various areas of new growth intermixed with older growth were also indicative of isolated surface slides which have failed in the recent past. The lower east-west landslide has prevented a large natural buttress from being created and as such,the steady 179 Madrone Lane North Bainbridge Island,WA 98111) Tel:(2116)780 4370 Fax:(206)780-9438 www.aspectconsulting.corn a limited liability company • LOG ITEM Seiichi Adachi # March 5,2010 Pageroject No. 080029-002-01 surface failure of the slope continues with resultant movement of the top of slope back through the developed areas of the yard and toward the residence. Design Recommendations for MRE Buttress As shown on revised Figure A,a reinforced slope is proposed which begins at approximately 60 feet elevation and then descends at a grade of 1.3H to 1V.(Horizontal:Vertical)to where the toe of the slope is truncated by the ground surface or at the working offset from the 15-foot elevation of the ground.At this point,the MRE continues vertically to reach undisturbed consolidated native soil (either advance outwash or lacustrine clay).Because of the existing steepness of the slope,the MRE installation is stopped near the top where a MRE thickness of 5 feet cannot be maintained without excavating in-situ hard soils. Above this area,the surface is protected with rockery armor rock which would be placed from the top of the slope. Details for the anticipated heights and limits of the MRE slope are shown on revised Figure A.Details of the sections are also shown on revised Figure A. Stability of Slope and Buttress Given that this area of the site does not contain the current landslide (i.e., it has glacial consolidated material throughout the height of the slope), a slightly lower PGA for this soil column of 0.34g was used.This results in a seismic coefficient of 0.17g for the seismic case. Using the"Slide" computer program, factors of safety against failure were determined.A minimum factor of safety for the static case of 1.5 was noted, and a minimum factor of safety of 1.2 for the seismic case was noted,using the above seismic coefficient.These values are found to be acceptable within the current state of the practice of geotechnical engineering and many stated agency minimums. Construction Details of the construction placement are found on revised Figure A. If there are any further questions,please contact us for any clarification. Aspect Consulting,LLC recommends that our staff be on site during critical steps in the construction to aid in field evaluation and compliance with the recommendations. Limitations This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of Seiichi Adachi and his agents for specific application to this project.Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our letter was prepared. This letter is not a legal opinion and there is no other warranty, expressed or implied. Our observations,findings,and opinions are a means to identify and reduce inherent risks to the owners. Page 2 • 0 Seiichi Adachi March 5,2010 Project No. 080029-002-01 Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, �, LOG ITEM Aspect consulting, LLC Page of6a.... 1,.PE 1'. kt I Ir . la 4 i 0 4%0 1 s �,�/fa loN�,,tea John L.Peterson,PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson@aspectconsulting.com Attachment: Figure A—Site Plan, Cross Sections,Details and Notes cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders W:\ GEOTECH\080029 Adachi Landslide\Deliverables\Addendum to Report.doc Page 3 Aspectconsutting earth +water LOG 177 -: Page ` Jc� -- GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Landslide Remediation - Adachi Property 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Seiichi Adachi Project No. 080029-001-02 • October 27, 2008 ■ • 0 AspeCtconsulting earth+water LOG ITEM Page--15G- ag 0a_ GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Landslide Remediation - Adachi Property 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Seiichi Adachi Project No. 080029-001-02 • October 27, 2008 Aspect Consulting,LLC cr-r7,>." y PBT� ,,,- -: 'AP` .'"-;, • ..,4 , , A .v.,,,,,,, fl y. 1 k\� \'� 164.4„18,3o2„ , /of 2/0q Y< Todd S.Parkington,PE John L.Peterson,PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer tparkington @aspectconsulting.com jpeterson @aspectconsulting.com W:1 GEOTECH1080029 Adachi Landslide 1Deliverabies\Geotechnical Investigation Report.doc 179 Madrone Lane North Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 Tel:(206)780-9370 Fax:(206)780-9438 www.aspectconsulting.com a limited liability company • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM Contents Page _ o,: 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Site Location 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Site Investigation 1 2.1 Site Description 1 2.2 Geologic Setting 2 2.3 Subsurface Exploration 2 2.3.1 Soil 3 2.3.2 Laboratory Testing 3 2.3.3 Groundwater 3 2.3.4 Seismic Information 3 3 Conclusions and Recommendations 5 3.1 Slope Stability 5 3.1.1 Slope Stability Back Analysis 5 3.1.2 Slope Mitigation 6 3.2 Soldier Pile Design 7 3.3 Lateral Earth Pressures 8 Limitations 9 List of Figures 1 Site Location Map 2 Site and Boring Location Plan List of Appendices A Boring Logs B Laboratory Test Results C Slope Stability Analyses PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • 4110 ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM 1 Introduction Page '- Aspect Consulting,LLC was retained by Mr. Seiichi Adachi to conduct a geotechnical engineering investigation related to a landslide that occurred on 1253 Deer Creek Road located east of Dabob Bay on the Toandos Peninsula in Jefferson County,Washington. The tax parcel identification number for this parcel is 601032020. 1.1 Site Location The site consists of a single parcel located at the west end of Deer Creek Road. Based on the United States Geologic Survey(USGS),7.5-minute Quilcene,Washington topographic quadrangle map,the property is located in Jefferson County in Section 3, Township 26 North,Range 1 West,W.M. and at Longitude 122.790 degrees W and Latitude 47.778 degrees N. The location of the site is presented on Figure 1,Site Location Map. 1.2 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential remediation methods for a landslide that occurred on the site the winter of 2007 to 2008. The landslide removed part of the access driveway for the existing house on the site. Remediation of the landslide would be performed to reduce the risk of further damage to the access driveway and possibly to restore the driveway in its original location. Our study included review of available geologic literature, drilling three borings to evaluate the engineering properties of the site soils, analyzing the stability of the slope using the soil information developed for this report and topography provided by Mr. Adachi,and providing general discussions regarding mitigating the risk of future slope movement and possibly repairing a portion of the site impacted by the landslide. This report presents the results of our investigation. The investigation was conducted in general accordance with our scope of work proposal,dated February 13,2008, and Contract Change Order 1,dated July 2,2008. 2 Site Investigation 2.1 Site Description The site is located on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula overlooking Dabob Bay. The parcel on which the residence is located is just under 7 acres in area. The site slopes down to the west,with the steepest portion of the slope below the house and driveway. The steepest portion of the slope is approximately 100 percent and 80 feet high above the shoreline. Above this,the slope grade gentles to about 40 percent. The slope continues up PROJECT NO.080029-001-02 •OCTOBER 27,2008 1 • - LOU II LM ASPECT CONSULTING Page % of 4 to the east beyond the property. The residence sits at the top of the steeper portion of the slope.The access driveway winds across the site from the southeast,curves north of the residence and approaches the residence from the northeast. The slide occurred to the north of the house at and above the steepest part of the slope. The maximum elevation of the slide is at about elevation 120,which is about 40 feet higher than the top of the steepest portion of the slope.A portion of the upper part of the slide extended into the access driveway.The resulting slide scarp at the head of the slide is approximately 10 feet high and between vertical and 1H:1V(Horizontal:Vertical)in steepness. The location of our borings and the topography are shown on Figure 2,Site and Boring Location Plan. 2.2 Geologic Setting The Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources(WDGER), Geologic Map of Washington—Northwest Quadrant,dated 2002,indicates that the site is underlain by Deposits of pre-Fraser Age,Undifferentiated(Qgpc). These deposits are described as clay,silt,sand,gravel,till and peat,generally moderately to deeply weathered and compact. 2.3 Subsurface Exploration Three borings(B-1 through B-3)were drilled on the site on March 19,2008 and samples were obtained to aid in the determination of engineering properties of the subsurface materials.The test borings were located on the site as shown on Figure 2.Boring locations were estimated in the field by measuring from existing site features. The borings went to a maximum depth of 41.5 feet below the ground surface using a track- mounted limited access hollow stem auger drill rig. Split spoon(1 3/8-inch inner- diameter)samples were obtained from the borings in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test Procedures(American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM]D 1586), at 5-foot intervals.The split spoon sampler is driven 18 inches into the soil by a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler are counted for each 6 inches of penetration. The blow count for the first 6 inches of penetration is discarded,and the remaining blow counts are summed to produce the Standard Penetration Resistance(N). Geologic Drill drilled the borings under the direction of Aspect Consulting,LLC. Logs of the borings indicating the type of soils encountered are presented in Appendix A. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between soil types. Changes logged between sample intervals in our borings were interpreted. Soils were classified in general accordance with the ASTM D-2488, "Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils(Visual and Manual Procedure)". In addition to the borings performed for this investigation, information gathered at the site for construction of the existing house was used to enhance our understanding of the site soils.This information is contained in a report prepared by Shannon&Wilson,Inc. 2 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT CONSULTING for Mr. Sei Adachi,titled Geotechnical Report,Adachi Property on Toandos Peninsula, dated September, 1998. LOG ITEM 2.3.1 Soil pp In general, subsurface conditions on the slope consisted of sand or silty sand ovaryit�O silts and clays. The relative density of the sand encountered in the borings drilled within the landslide area was loose.The consistency of the silt and clay was generally hard. The soil descriptions in the Shannon&Wilson report were similar. However,the apparently in-place upper sands described in that report had relative density ranging from loose to medium dense. 2.3.2 Laboratory Testing To aid in classifying the soils and to estimate general soil characteristics,laboratory tests were performed on selected representative samples. The following tests were performed: grain size distribution(ASTM D422),Atterberg limits(ASTM D4318)and moisture content(ASTM D2216). Analytical Resources,Inc. in Tukwila,Washington was retained to provide geotechnical laboratory analysis. The results of the laboratory testing are presented on the boring logs and in Appendix B. 2.3.3 Groundwater Groundwater was not noted in the borings prepared for this report. However,there was water flowing out of the slope in the area of the slide and the moisture content laboratory tests indicate that the upper sands have high moisture contents and are likely saturated. The saturation appears to extend into the silts and clays for some distance. The relatively low permeability of the silts and clays would tend to mask the presence of groundwater during drilling. Groundwater was encountered in the borings performed for the referenced Shannon&Wilson report. This report indicated perched groundwater in the sand over the hard clay. Water table elevations fluctuate with time,being dependent on seasonal precipitation,irrigation,land use,and climatic conditions,as well as other factors. Therefore,water level observations at the time of the field investigation may vary from those encountered during the construction phase of the project.The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. 2.3.4 Seismic Information Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code(IBC)is used to classify soils and rock into categories for use in seismic design of structures. One of the criteria by which soil can be classified using the table is the average Standard Penetration Resistance (N-value)within the top 100 feet of soil. Site specific data were not developed to a depth of 100 feet.However,N-values do not typically decrease with depth. Using the final blow count in our borings as representative of the soil beneath the borings,the average blow count for the upper 100 feet of soil ranges from 33 to 50. Therefore,for seismic design of structures,the site should be considered Class D, "stiff soil",as defined in the IBC. Chapter 16 of the IBC provides equations for converting the mapped earthquake spectral response to the design spectral response. The mapped earthquake spectral response accelerations for short periods(Ss) and for 1-second periods(S1)were obtained for the PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 3 • ASPECT CONSULTING site from the United States Geologic Survey's National Seismic Hazards Mapping Project website using the latitude and longitude given in Section 1.1,above. S.at the site is 1.21g and S1 is 0.44g. Site coefficients for this site are Fa= 1.1,F,= 1.6. The design earthquake spectral response accelerations adjusted for site class effects are Sds=0.89g, Shc =0.47g. As indicated in Chapter 18 of the IBC,a design peak ground acceleration(PGA)for the site may be estimated from the Sds by dividing Sds by 2.5 which results in 0.36g. LOG ITEM Page 1 of 4 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM 3 Conclusions and Recommendations Page B of 3.1 Slope Stability Aspect Consulting,LLC performed a slope stability analysis on a cross section drawn through the slope. The analysis was conducted using the commercially available software Slide 4.0 by Rocscience. A groundwater table was assumed to be present in the slope at shallow depth. Soil strength parameters were estimated from the results of the subsurface investigation combined with a back analysis of topography present before the slide and an assumed safety factor of just under 1.0. The pseudostatic method was used for our slope stability analysis to estimate the safety factor under seismic conditions. The seismic coefficient used in a pseudostatic analysis is typically taken to be about 1/2 of the PGA that the site is estimated to experience during the design earthquake. For this project,we used a seismic coefficient of 0.18g. The results of slope stability analyses are expressed as factors of safety against displacement failure. The factor of safety is the ratio of resisting forces to driving forces. A factor of safety of 1.0 is equilibrium;a factor of safety of less than 1.0 indicates failure. Typically, a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 for static conditions and 1.0 for seismic (pseudostatic)conditions is considered adequate. The lower minimum safety factor for seismic conditions is adequate as the probability of occurrence of the seismic conditions analyzed is relatively low. Based on our observations at the site,the head of the slide or slide scarp does not appear to be very stable.Portions of the scarp are vertical or near vertical with water flowing from the base of the scarp in at least one location. The scarp appears to be 8 to 12 feet high. As the steepness of the scarp appears to be greater than other slopes in the upper sand in this area,we anticipate that over time, if no remediation is performed,the scarp will slough to a shallower angle. The approximate location of the slide scarp on the south (residence)side of the slide is indicated on Figure 2. 3.1.1 Slope Stability Back Analysis Our first slope stability analysis for the project was performed using topography available from a survey done for the site prior to construction of the existing house. This topography was developed by Clark Land Office in 1998.Using this topography,we varied the soil parameters of the loose sand layer until a safety factor of about 1 was obtained for a slip surface similar in location and shape to the slide was achieved. We also used topography developed by Main-Line Surveying earlier this year to analyze the slope in its current state. We again varied the soil parameters of the loose sand layer until a safety factor slightly greater than 1 was obtained. This would represent the minimum possible for the slope to be holding in its current configuration. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 5 • ASPECT CONSULTING Based on these analyses,we used an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees and a LOG ITEM cohesion of 100 pounds per square foot(psf)for the loose sand layer. Graphical# representations of our analysis are presented in Appendix C. Page o 3.1.2 Slope Mitigation Slope mitigation refers to any method used to increase the stability of a slope or any method used to reduce the risk of damage to people or property from slope movement. Methods used to increase the stability of the slope could include regrading the slope to a shallower angle,placement of a soil buttress at the toe of the slope,removal of soil from the top of the slope,or construction of shoring walls on the slope. Methods to reduce the risk of damage to people or property from slope movement include locating structures away from unstable slopes or constructing barriers to limit soil movements toward structures. For purposes of this study we have focused on methods to increase the stability of the slope,as the existing house is already present and there is little available space to move the access driveway. The limitations of space on the site make regrading the slope or removing soil from the top of the slope infeasible.As the potentially unstable portion of the slope is in the loose sand,with a steeper hard clay slope below it, a toe buttress would likely not be workable. Therefore,construction of a shoring wall of some type appears to be the most feasible option for increasing the stability of the slope. We considered the merits of several types of walls as a remediation for the landslide including mechanically reinforced earth(MRE)walls,gravity walls(concrete or concrete block), soldier pile walls and soil nail walls. MRE walls consist of compacted soil reinforced with plastic geogrid. Gravity walls are reinforced concrete,or concrete, masonry,or gabion blocks. Soldier pile walls consist of steel beams placed vertically in drilled holes backfilled with concrete. Wood or concrete lagging is placed in the space between adjacent soldier piles. Soil nails are steel pins placed in holes drilled at an angle into the slope with the holes backfilled with cement grout. Any wall can be subject to a failure that results from movement of the soil beneath the wall.Therefore, for remediation of this slide,any wall must extend through the loose sand to or into the hard clay soil beneath. From the borings drilled for this report and for the Shannon&Wilson report,we anticipate that up to 30 feet of loose sand may be present.A 30-foot deep excavation for construction of either a gravity wall or an MRE wall would likely be prohibitively expensive. Soil nails work by increasing the total strength of the potentially unstable soil.We anticipate that several rows of nails would need to be installed to sufficiently increase the soil strength.This would require equipment moving on the steep face of the slope where the landslide occurred. We anticipate that the installation requirements for this site and the number of soil nails needed would make this option more expensive than a soldier pile wall. Installation of a soldier pile wall requires relatively large drill equipment to excavate the holes and install the piles. However,the incremental cost of increasing the lengths of the piles to reach a bearing layer such as the hard clay is generally not prohibitive. Further, the piles can be installed in such a way as to allow backfill soil to be placed to re- 6 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • ASPECT CONSULTING establish the access drive in its pre-slide condition. Soldier pile walls that have an exposed height of greater than 10 to 12 feet are typically reinforced by adding a row or rows of tiebacks.A tieback is a hole drilled from the face of the slope at a near horizontal angle. A steel cable is placed in the hole and the hole is filled with cement grout. The cable is then attached to the soldier pile to increase its load capacity for retained soil. One further possible option for the project is to not attempt any remediation of the landslide. The access driveway has been moved to the south away from the landslide at this time,and no other structures were directly affected by the slide. The primary disadvantage to this option is that the post landslide topography does not appear to be very stable as discussed in the slope stability section above. We understand that some of the utilities for the residence are within a few feet of the top of the slide scarp. The access driveway has been moved essentially as far to the south as is reasonably possible for the site.For these reasons,any further movement of the landslide towards the structures LOG i,�G T M likely to damage utilities and possibly cut vehicle access to the residence. 3.2 Soldier Pile Design page of Using the results of our slope stability back analysis described above,we analyzed the slope with soldier piles in place. Based on this analysis,each soldier pile must extend through the loose sand into the hard clay and be capable of withstanding a shear force of 33.3 kips per linear foot of spacing between center of piles(200 kips for a 6-foot spacing). The pile must be capable of withstanding this force at any location within the loose sand layer.In addition,the wall must be designed to withstand the lateral earth forces as discussed in Section 3.3 below.Note that the shear force that the pile needs to resist at depth includes the lateral rotational earth forces; i.e.,the pile must be able to resist lateral earth forces of the exposed wall section and the shear force of the lower earth movement,but not both simultaneously. For design of the piles,the following soil parameters may be used: Soil Type Unit Weight(pcf) Angle of Internal Cohesion(psf) Friction Sandy Backfill 120 35 0 Loose Sand 120 30 100 Hard Clay 120 0 4000 For a pile designed to withstand the force given above,the safety factor against slope movement for the slope increase to about 1.5 under static conditions. 1.5 is generally considered an adequate safety factor for static slope stability.For a pile designed as above,the slope will have a safety factor equal to or greater than one for seismic (pseudo- static)conditions with a horizontal seismic coefficient of up to 0.19. This corresponds to a design peak ground acceleration of between 0.29 and 0.38. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 7 • • LOG ITEM ASPECT CONSULTING )37- Page eL 3.3 Lateral Earth Pressures Lateral pressures are exerted on below grade basement and retaining walls by backfill soils,surcharge loads,and hydrostatic pressures caused by groundwater.Lateral earth pressures on walls depend upon the type of wall,type of backfill material and allowable wall movements.For a free standing soldier pile wall that is free to rotate away from the retained soil,lateral earth pressures should be estimated for an"active"condition. For walls that are compressing the retained soil,lateral earth pressures should be estimated for a"passive"condition. For the proposed case of a free-standing soldier pile wall with backfill placed above the wall,the active earth pressure coefficient(Ka)will be 0.27 and the equivalent fluid unit weight will be 33 pounds per cubic foot(pcf). This assumes an angle of internal friction of 35 degrees and a unit weight of 120 pcf for the backfill and no slope above the wall. For the loose sand below the exposed portion of the wall,the passive earth pressure coefficient(l( )will be 0.56 and the equivalent fluid unit weight will be 67 pcf.This assumes an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees,a unit weight of 120 pcf and a 2H:1 V slope below the wall.A passive pressure of 2,000 pcf may be used for the hard clay encountered below the sands.Note that as the below grade portion of the wall consists of piles without lagging,the passive pressure acts over a distance equal to 2.5 times the pile diameter; i.e.,if the pile spacing is greater than 2.5 times the pile diameter,the passive pressure exerted by the soil in front of the wall will be less than the maximum possible. The recommended equivalent fluid unit weights do not include hydrostatic pressure due to groundwater accumulated behind walls, seismic loading,or any surcharge due to nearby loading from structures, equipment or traffic.The"passive"pressure was reduced by a factor of 2 to limit wall translation. Note that if the wall design includes the passive pressure provided by the loose sand downslope from the wall location,it is possible that a future landslide occurring entirely downslope of the wall may cause damage to the wall. This potential damage could be mitigated by ignoring the passive pressure provided from the loose sand. This would likely require the addition of tiebacks to the soldier piles.Alternatively,the wall could be retrofitted with tiebacks after the occurrence of such a landslide. Some movement at the top of the wall would likely occur as the soldier piles bend in response to the loss of passive pressure. In our opinion,the most reasonable alternative is to use the loose sand passive pressure,while allowing for the future installation of tiebacks should a lower slope slide occur. The potential seismic force on the wall can be modeled as a uniform pressure on the back of the wall equal to 11 times the exposed height of the wall(in feet). The units for this pressure are pounds per square foot(psf). Weep holes or some other provision for water to flow out from behind the wall should be installed at the base of the wall to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the structure. Based on the presence of water flowing out of the slope after the slide, provisions for collecting and safely draining any water from the weep hole areas should be made to avoid erosion occurring on the slope below the wall. 8 PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 • • ASPECT CONSULTING LOG ITEM 2 Limitations Work for this project was performed and this report prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the nature and conditions of work completed in the same or similar localities,at the time the work was performed. It is intended for the exclusive use of Mr. Seiichi Adachi for specific application to the referenced property. This report does not represent a legal opinion.No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the geologic reconnaissance and three borings completed for this project.Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground,extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. Please note that differing subsurface conditions may be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. PROJECT NO.080029-001-02•OCTOBER 27,2008 9 J ; ,,�s . s b' '. fi "_r c f� a t ;- E. d ;{ k . .0 ti 'S 2$/ t , e %z TL ('. a , . . ,l .. �'.T' t r ua s .e i , , - m ,,� �,., 7 C F "N„...:,--,',.1 `y', t s"-,+S.-.a 'T t t a, } - � 17 i 44'''';',-F,...7,47:'z °jf aP" rave l ;,�1', j k" r t j t.f /1= .:, �� y L'C A 1 t'r sx �,A t t Y" 7 ./ �� r i x � r t, >.R v �4'w� � rV /` '�� f � -jay,.-� F t � #��'✓ � T� f i i i � r"� t f � r` g t� .t / . ,., ' s .� r r �, l ,� 1.fifndro S rl , ,w. .xis , �+d ,, i F6 t c 3,-.---;,-..k.- # - t {t'1.r 3's ),".-,K3-.7-'7,' +'36 > "#• i.':-;;;11,1;."''',1-2 7 x"¢ i I i` 61 1 �nrt°. z3 i + s [rt "may �'. � �� /�11,�. �'.-::./.40,.'1/1;4.4-'1,1 �' r�.L- a � � r a,• r„„i,7„,..„,-,,,,,- Site Locatiot '. . V r. kr S,`>t r or�- "_74H'-'-z----..-Ul 'r} ti '° ,i+M r~ s.� 1 !2 • ..,1 !} Sri { y t`C i _ Cl l ` 1 r % H rr x r+ ..,1„ i.1,. I rft1 ' f« '�' ,{ r -t t . :' A q° r j� /11 lar' w \�y„ "�� a .:`yam L-', } ,_' f "`,d` t L i 1 &,t *r .: Ot �a. x... M -.41-4 F E' T1 "J 7- ls `'� . �. it a # , 4 5 I ( ,-:.,3.),.,,----,-,,-T 3 � t $. " s . �� ',,,,..,-1,-', a u 1 _ ' ✓{ .... � y 7 k�e -,,:.'1' a `. if-i { .s. \ ! ?s � f 'rf Cry �: + ' , ,, 1 k ? 1 e[ r:.:...,..c` �.. a�*' 4`,,,,, . to tt'; _ !'.�''` ,. s v N-,,.; -'l 'f r' .)1 '-- . ,+,. .4 ; °` ” , of + j ,'f t a �r'f 'it*-- - I0 O i f c. ti 1� 1I "'"° s1 ` ,.l '� 1-1.1.,1', .j of CampEGunn x' 4 , 5'7(ri1 ", _ t - v ,I r�7 /�6 r V� :1S , �-. � ,.rr '� '=,t i�-"� s a o d awl, ` a h,. L N ii di Tabook Pt � ,.vim �, N1lX3t`�'�e + i 'F ' .is o ' * �vAiCaN r + ry I 'Q o + a is ;, o 0 �`�1 a00 - 2000,,t:' � t�°xY', 3n� / < '�`' +. �, g* ;� 'c -+„ 33 - ' ' r# _4 Q Ave " 1 i3�-. "'. w� _.i^ N .44 Site Location Map October2008 PROJECT NO. ,Aspectconsutting .. o earth+water nT3P 080029 L 4S www.aspectconsulting.com a,,,,,,, a°i Adachi Landslide a°PMe FIGURE NO. ~o eum��rreb�ry ��y Toandos Peninsula,Jefferson County,Washington "tea. 7 _ci 6`0'Z68 o!w. ,WIW,r1!WWI EZ00004IO.1 -0 g of g g o N .„.1..„.1. o " al• •= m ��, s t y °I4 o !� LOG ITEM z a 2. ou- 3 ��W age PI of i o a O i-W 32 3 m• m n�tGU 4 as° J z N -- e s 1 ' - t i a - - - CD Q 45 _ < s Q Q o g 1 O �\ �� I o a e'^'�e rzQ 00 I>- e N �� ~ C M----1 7i'ti:42. \ I 22 Iw S - E 3C;I:ao I_LI c4(f) \� JN•':• \\ =-3N Z d i Nei Z' .^o N a •\\'e� ` 5 a ao�° I gxa §�. ' 033 S cv oz I a I m likisil g in $L ' r. ♦ \ Z dW w 5e , � tt - 1 i: k' I: t s � t � 7 'to ilf.. ril ilia iAlli g \*\j, .”..„ 4`," , 2 . tia''J / h II 2--- �ror.r.K - .65 A W N Y/ 2. -' G1 § _ m m . a a a 5° q :g 0.5_, m 8 y 5. Q r n"s"a u. 040-si e o Z !y.h3p'/ a El m a 8 a 1 H L- y,., I c.ill ifi4 iii ii 1 \ 1p gif.: III tY` , - - - 1• R \ 1 �-I , z. 03 / r if \ p, RI - 7 '9' T ■ `WI ,, t.,4*??.. '\ p _ .0,- E m I (0 -.4v.t.,.. \ t-- -4 lid � 4 A I \ t r P • ,`♦♦,y♦ ♦ , , ♦O`er♦ iq � ' ' , $ ,^♦ 11�,� ,\4, ; II \ , II ,7,1-4\ .,1 ;0; 0�,4,N 11 N. r^t• \ 44 try Coy`�`t4e X94 \`,. iX Y . .10, .,,,_,,,:.....,.. p I'll \ 4 .. „.. . .,. \\\ 4 4\...r 1 „, zo` , =a 7 G 3 I. f �_ i a I r 1• n it m R "y{ i 4 I . ___. . ._ - �� :� `: `, - I I I $ E `4ti a ill i , If: ,;.,:,,,, \ C I I I ia* Intl ,.F.1\ .„-„tvirt $1. \j,..„ > ‘ 4 23 I ' I h' \ A N <`,i,, ''' ,'IN.,iI 1 d i it -'' 4 + q 8 s .. ,. r R o ipi Oa 0 i '-.,I lid �f-TifX .'sl y / a a a a 6 a W a a a o a a a a a a a °a V' I fi R f I I! ! Q 7 t hh` fir tt.� �� S t A gill toot'0 fifi: 4 � 3 I if n(i�L �� t li I a . X/ a * v -41.,,t,,,, , v D i xi t i { ' ' ii O" Li .' i , 4,,,,,.4',,i1A,,,IA....r . a a �1 i ,_< m ,, 4. � o rt Z J' n � i Yo �g 6 co z d O -® 1 A. CO 1 N . , , O 1 a N b <D Q:\GeoTech\080029 Adachi Landslide2009-10\080029-01.dwg ci Q N ii rr / i x \ :><-t:I 890.87 J _ _: 0 e >s f?` X13. e i \ /0 ' R. , f\N\ N :\'I FAIY • + � III \\Sl. m a V f' ii\n,{ g $ c m _. �r t. 8 �� ,ulS T\ 4 �J g0 w 2j N . 110 O 1 ••Al: II/ lii 11 V m � i z zr -- - � ' �L6�l / _. ' 1 VA ..•,.., 4 :ii nI «• . O ( / ••�• 161:;•11+. I • C •i•P• ZmOm ❖�,� tom\ 1 1 Ni/ ±•� R R■ � ° 4 2 o ioi°, ??zO 0 = 10. `d'�? . OZ(nO D 5 '.0.:.;, •♦.; • \\ 5 .. z r^,e��Z oazn o o v 1 z 1 c--I O D r i'•:: \ rnn �On�Mnino ; m • Npm ( c 'O A 9'.'. �\ n V J a z o g _2 r. \ ,„?....... \ —I A3 ryAY.. n z �''S �n I CCr C/1 ii♦ r� '41 mulyA c> C �ZDC ••' :,. 7 2 = V m I o r .4v a e4...♦e. T c°o o c) �'1 G) \\ -.> 3 F _ m z . Ml' cl z C)•1' i' • 'O w .c o , C (9, _ . �� ,rte ; _ ' r < 1 ®2, - 7 35 o" tom--++ �< CO 3 CFNTF ur; 3 iii E.: 11: ,, - = 0 c)n -.... )> :-...- rTi > x. . co W P b ? O t ---I d)o G (-,4 O zm N ) a, V o n N 0 7 "1 (. , o t -.• 4fir7 1 -I Vy O qo°z v 0 1 ao a. N c vz • 0 CO Q:\GeoTech\080029 Adachi Landslide12008-09\080029-02.dwg 1 • LOG rrcio # ‘9, ,dw APPENDIX A Boring Logs ! • . 0'„0 Well-graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency• p - s 2.2. GW gravel with sand,little to Density SPT1 21blows/foot `` m •0.0 no fines U F• o •• Very Loose 0 to 4 N m iL ° ° Coarse-Coarse- Loose 4 to 10 > m a') Lo 0°°0°°o Poorly-graded gravel Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 0 0 C- ° ° Test Symbols in c.)v 00000 Gp and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 y °o v° 0 00000 little to no fines Very Dense >50 G=Grain Size csr o z °°°o° (2 M=Moisture Content o o o , Consistency SPT (blows/foot A=Atterberg Limits z Silty gravel and silty 9 c v^ • Very Soft 0 to 2 C=Chemical F, Y c�'.; •E GM gravel with sand Fine- Soft 2 to 4 DD=Dry Density a� m c$•� ' Grained Soils c o a� i,_r7 Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K= Permeability 'm 2 iY ..�•. �-. j Stiff 8 to 15 Cl) III ,,.�/ Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 ^�`fJ;f GC clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 o .� Component Definitions r C Well-graded sand and Descriptive Term Size Range and Sieve Number LOG ITEM 2). '� a sw sand with gravel,little Boulders Larger than 12" 0 m m to no fines Cobbles 3"to 12" cL LL E. N LL Gravel 3"to No.4(4.75 mm) - j N c > Poorly-graded sand Coarse Gravel 3"to 3/4" _t '-}f in U sp and sand with gravel, Fine Gravel 3/4"to No.4(4.75 mm) c �aci v little to no fines Sand No.4(4.75 mm)to No.200(0.075 mm) c2 N Silty sand and Coarse Sand No.4(4.75 mm)to No.10(2.00 mm) m - m ✓y SM silty sand with Medium Sand No.10(2.00 mm)to No.40(0.425 mm) Fine Sand No.40(0.425 mm)to No.200(0.075 mm) U o a LL gravel Silt and Clay Smaller than No.200(0.075 mm) u2) N Clayey sand and C3� 2 na i sc clayey sand with gravel Estimated Percentage Moisture Content �n Percentage Dry-Absence of moisture, by Weight Modifier dusty,dry to the touch Silt,sandy silt,gravelly silt, <5 Trace Slightly Moist-Perceptible �, o ML silt with sand or gravel moisture aa) I.° 5 to 15 Slightly(sandy,silty, Moist-Damp but no visible in >w clayey,gravelly) water 0o m w j Clay of low to medium 15 to 30 Sandy,silty,clayey, Very Moist-Water visible but ci 1 CL plasticity;silty,sandy,or gravelly) not free draining z m w gravelly clay,lean clay 30 to 49 Very(sandy,silty, Wet-Visible free water,usually y Y / clayey,gravelly) from below water table a `�5 Organic clay or silt of low a Symbols `q 1 Cement grout E II OL plasticity Blows/6"or surface seal 0 Sampler portion of 6" o Type Bentonite Elastic silt,clayey silt,silt 2.0"OD o Sampler Type chips g �, MH with micaceous or diato- Split-Spoon p Description Bentonite in o maceous fine sand or silt Sampler " Continuous Push c4) seal N >,g (SPT) ' Filter pack with .o m o / 3.25"OD Split-Spoon Ring Sampler blank casing o Clay of high plasticity, (4) v v u' sandy or gravelly clay,,fat Bulk sample vi section Cl) c -- CH y g y y 3.0"OD Thin-Wall Tube Sampler rn m 0 E / clay with sand or gravel 0 (including Shelby tube) LI Screened casing 3 y g ( g y ) or Hydrotip with o J Grab Sample filter pack Q c - ///j///j Organic clay or silt of O Portion not recovered ■ End cap a) it :J f„f// GH medium to high �, //i��/i/ plasticity (t) Percentage by dry weight 151 Combined USCS symbols used for 3 /�f� 12) (SPT)Standard Penetration Test fines between 5%and 15%as o w� (ASTM D-1586) estimated in General Accordance '�o Peat,muck and other s a” c f° " " highly organic soils 13) In General Accordance with with Standard Practice for a rn • of 0 " pT Standard Practice for Description Description and Identification of W CI)=O and Identification of Soils(ASTM D-2488) Soils(ASTM D-2488) y orwlorWv 141 Depth of groundwater a ATD=At time of drilling a) Y. Static water level(date) 12 _ m -o Classifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations,which include density/consistency,moisture condition,grain size,and m plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein.Visual-manual and/or laboratory classification co methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. v an PROJECT NO. c ‘Aspect consulting �" `° consultin v, earth+water Exploration Log Key o FIGURE NO. < www.aspectconsulting.com e U aNmifed liability Company �H ner_ A- Qi - d IlIAspectCO115UltIRg Project Number •ring Log Boring Number Sheet earth+water _ 080029-001-02 _ B-1 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value • Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Bows/ Water Content%* Material Description Depth (feet) Type/ID 6" 0 10 20 30 4.0 5C Type (ft) o 10 t Loose,slightly moist,silty,very sandy GRAVEL o'. .. (GM),trace organics. 1 — o10c — 1 3 In�w 0 1°< 2— SIPOC —2 X---- '- ,a 4 Stiff,moist,very sa dy IL�T^.(ML fine sand, -3•3— 4 trace organics. L1, ITEM 6 4— # js —4 I 5— ° I Pa- f-; —5 m=24% 5 I 5 At 7 6 — \ Grades to very moist. —6 7— \ —7 8 8— Z 10 I Grades to very stiff. —8 0 12 1 9— — I —9 1 10— / —10 -200=63% 6 11— 9 I X m=29%, 5 Grades to wet and stiff. / A —11 12— � —12 5 I 13— 6 1 —13 7 T I 14— I —14 I 15— I 6 I —15 6 l I 16— 7 I a 16 — v 17— —17 3 I 18— 3 —18 5 co 19— — \\ —19 o cs \ F 20— m=34% 11 \� —20 19 27 a 21 I %// Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). 21 0 0• 22— I —22 °z 10 � 23 18 X • % Grades to very moist. —23 Y 29 °a 24— I / —24 I O I J _ j O Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL re m ® No Recovery i Static Water Level Approved by:TSP o ® Split Spoon V Water Level(ATD) 0� Figure No. A-2 • BIg Log 411AS ectconsuttin 9 Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-1 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Sample Tests Blows/ N-value • Material Elevation Borehole Completion Type/ID 6" water Content%* Type Description Depth (feet) ELI 10 20 30 40 50 (ft) m=24% 9 18 i / j 1 26— 30 —26 LOG l° . 2 j - .:,, 7— —27 28— 0 Pageof t —28 29— —29 30— —30 m=22% 11 18 •� 31— 30 31 32— Bottom of borehole at 31.5 bgs.Borehole —32 backfilled with bentonite chips. 33— —33 34— L34 35— —35 36— —36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— 1-42 43— —43 w 44— —44 O N d 45— —45 0 O o 46— —46 a 0 w• 47— —47 J co 0 g 48— —48 ° a 49— —49 a 0 J z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL Ei °m 0 No Recovery t Static Water Level x Approved by:TSP ®Split Spoon V Water Level(ATD) 0 w Figure No. A-2 firing Log AS eCt consuttin g Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-2 1 of 2 _ Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth! Sample Tests Bows/ N-value • Material Elevation Borehole Completion Type/ID 6.. Water Content%* ten Description Depth (feet) 0 10 20 30 40 50 (ft) - Loose,wet,brown,slightly silty SAND(SP-SM), trace organics,fine sand. 1 — — 1 2— —2 2 LOC ITEM —3 3— 2 2 4— I -----Sc___-.'"--.7 —4 5— I ' " . . —5 — m=35%, 2 I -200=9% 2 2 l 6— I —6 I I 7— I —7 4 I 8— 3 —8 2 •9— \ —9 10— m=26% 13 �\ Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). —10 20 25 11— f / / Slow drilling. —11 / 12— / —12 8 13— 15 L 1 very Grades to moist. —13 20 T / 14— — 1 —14 I 15— m=28% 10 I —15 18 I 16— 18 / I / —16 I 17— / —17 I 12 I 18— 20 I —18 20 I co 19— — / —19 o N I N I d _20— m=24% 10 I / —20 10 4 0 21— — 25 —21 Iii 9 22— / —22 i °z 23— / —23 o a 24— —24 (.5 j C..' __ _ _ if 4 z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL c 2 ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level Approved by:TSP o ®Split Spoon Q Water Level(ATD) o Figure No. A-3 • Bflg Log � p As ectconsuttin 9 Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water _ 080029-001-02 B-2 2 of 2 _ Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value A Elevation Borehole Completion Trip Tests Blows/ Water Content%* Maai Description Depth (feet) _ 0 10 20 30 40 50 (ft) X m=26% 13 I j 18 26— 21 1 j I —26 I LOG27— I /// g .. i._ 1 <<<- —27 I // 28— I % —28 I Page-9,,, '--,.._,..5D- -29 I I I — 30 m=23% 10 —30 12 31— X 18 / 6" wet (ML). —31 / \ ( ) 32 —32 33— Driller indicates gravel Y ravel la er. —33 34— —34 35— — o —35 m=22% 8 13 1 36— 19 —36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— — -40 o m=26/0 13 16 • 41— 19 j —41 42— Bottom of borehole at 41.5'bgs.Borehole —42 backfilled with bentonite chips. 43— —43 0 44— —44 0 N N 45— —45 d n U 0 o 46— —46 2 0 0 47— —47 J (n 0 Z 48— —48 0 Q °a 49— —49 ° 0 J CI• Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL ce °m• ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level w ®Split Spoon Approved by:TSP o Water Level(ATD) o Figure No. A-3 . ____, AspeCtcansutting lying Log Project Number Boring Number Sheet • earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ N-value Material (feet) Type/ID 6" Water Content%* Tye Description Depth 0 10 20 30 40 50_ (ft) • Loose,wet,brown,slightly gravelly,very silty 1 — - • SAND(SM),trace organics,trace wood. — 1 2- -2 — . m=27%, 2 Stiff,wet,dark rg S5 V111) 3 A -200=99% 2 organics. g y i s nd,trace —3 4— c 6 9- \ -4 5— I \\ � _ f 7� j 15 \ Grades to very stiff. `� -5 13 6— P 7 4\ —6 7— \ —7 ' Grades to hard. 8— �;/ 7 \\ 6"of sandy SILT(ML). 14 23 A 1-8 \ 9- \ —9 10— \ m=24% 13 \ —10 24 50+\ 11— r 30 —11 Trace fine sand. 12— I -12 13— 24 22 —13 ' 27 14— I / —14 Trace fine sand. 15— /' / T-15 m=24% 14 / i 23 16— 26 —16 1 17— 1 1\\\\ —17 18— —18 0 19— I —19 0 N `,▪ 20— 1 $ I 9 1 —20 a 21— 26 ♦ —21 l w I O 22— 0 � —22 23— z � I —23 a ° 24— I a —24 a I o I -J o z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL E. °m ® No Recovery t = Static Water Level F ®Split Spoon Q Approved by:TSP o Water Level(ATD) w op Figure No. A-4 r �, Bng Log %Aspectconsulting Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Sample Tests Blows/ N-value • Material Elevation Borehole Completion Samp a s. Water Content°k* TY� Description Depth (feet) p 10 20 30 40 50 (ft) m=29%, 18 -200=100% 31 50+j 26— y 47 Tip of sampler is wet. —26 LOG — 27— —27 1 28— Page ' —28 29— —29 N-value collected again at 31.5;no sample 30— m=21%, 11 retained. —30 -200=100% 24 50+ N-value(blow counts)possibly over-estimated 31— \ 38 due to sampler flexing. —31 32— 11 20 50+ X32 31 33— — 33 Bottom of borehole at 33'bgs.Borehole 34— backfilled with bentonite chips. —34 35— —35 36— —36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— —42 43— —43 0 44— —44 0 N N 45— —45 m 0 ° 46— —46 00 0 0 47— —47 J 0 0 z 48— —48 0 a 49— —49 0 0 J - z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL re °m ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level = Approved by:TSP F IN Split Spoon Water Level(ATD) 0 o Figure No. A-4 • • LOG ITEM # Pag�_ APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results • • LOG ITEM Aspect Consulting Adachi Landslide 080029 Page a 7 • Atterberg Limits 80 - 70 60 CH or OH c 'Q• 50 . ' 40 5 • 30 • MH or OH 20 CL or OL • 10 CL-ML ML or OL 0 , 0 20 40 60 80 100 Liquid Limit •B-1 25 •B-2 20 •B-3 10 Sample Number Depth (ft) As-Received Plasticity Liquid Plastic Limit USCS Moisture Content Index Limit B-1 25 23.54 26.4 48.5 22.1 CL B-2 20 23.90 18.0 40.3 22.3 CL B-3 10 23.83 7.7 32.5 24.7 ML MP77 • LOG ITEM Jauld wowed Hage (; J ? 0 O 0> cO0 (0 t[O) CO N O O U) N CO N 1 N *1 2 Q OOZ# ' ' c >•% .c 00 09#09# m Oti# D as N OZ# • o O L"' T •L v 0io# A O P pp u0 pp/4 , o O 2n • T „t4C i III. II t • • • O O O O • • LOG !Tr— Page (e). D APPENDIX C Slope Stability Analyses • LO ITEM • # Page (t) ofr)" •.. , ... , , .... ,,,, m a)'- 0,... 0 o..• ,---, cs, - .....•• - .!..._,. \ ;,=.-.• a) o 0 s.) F*1)- . 73 a) •-•.c -- Sti)DO - 0 -U) - E — u) 0— , 0 a :i . t C•I ct, i--c....... c *( , Co ,-0 a< 1.0 c , • a) c3) (7) o 1 , co c (1)•- 0 il.? 0•,-, C 0'C":. , -J(1) DOLL • , i A , (13 [ C , i ,. -■ L 1 -tr) cr) 0 -,- - , co ,. 2 (.) ..... C . .... Q., i 0 ---e- C..) o a) r•T,c 1 C) [ Q tr) o in 0 tO o it) o IC) o 10 o ■-r-) o Ln o IC) o It) o Lr) o Lr) 0 0-)" 0.0 I- 0, c) (.1 in r-- o N ir) 1.-- C) N lf) r-- o N LO C-- 0 N Lr') r-- CD N Ln r-- o ■•-c5 ••.-..--, 1 1 • • • • ' • • • • • • ' ' • ' • • • • • • ' • • • i >),00 g cl)i -_o , 1 o c::, 0 0 ,--I .—I I-1 e.—I CV CV Cs) C\I CO Cr") C,) 01 ,3, ‘r •::. ,t• Lr) 1.r) u•-, i.r) ■13 ,_0..„,2 I. . [ i c •• 0.D_ h 1 vi .,''• ,< 0 0 u) g.,,e4".. 1.* .-lai 1 (.00-1) C1 I OD--• i-J--.< 1 09C 00£ oge oOe o i. o i• 09 0____ __ 0 0 LOG ITEM # . Page of 10 v _ . c., A ;',,, •i, --,, , :-- ._.. ... , \ ' - 0 o -Lo CN1 a.)N-0 1- Q. 0 iotod ir ___ c a) CO Ir., C 0 =(/) (..) • i .4 CO ...- .. ai co — c - 1 ...... c r -C) :_,..v_tn C:7) E c\I , ,--o •• ,_ a) o 0 a ..-? , co.c,)c< -. 1 — cu • a) (4)).o 0 C 0•;:: _iDOU- a1 .2-1— —'''''''' • . Co _u., , . , ._ CO o i 7-) r, a 1 - , a) -- 0) ,\ 70 V a/ i• , _ cn :c_l /z3 t -a LI,— c.) 0 ca c E.S?-)c< ■ "C3 a) = a) o a co 0_ .57n." o ' ■ ,=;_ 8 .. 0 c 0•c -,9 --,-5 ..,...5-Fp c)D(...)Li. , 9< , 0 - ?.,) 618 •`,17,)8 c-fp, 0 >,co c2 Ho. (t, c •• 6 (J., , < a o'rf) ,.., 0.- _.•- c, Lc) 0 ix) o ul o in o U) o i() o ir) o Lt) o in o iri o Lt) o ir) o fit-).u-w.4. o cv in r- o cv in NONLON o cv In r- 0 c' in 1.- o cv in n- o o o o o o ,-I ,-I ,-t I-INNNNO1COP101 ,1" .:1, ,MV. ir) ir) ir) in u) ! I •" 1 , 1 I 1 ' - - r 00£ 00Z 001. 0 -.. , 0 LOG ITEM S — •cf 0 - 0 (/) ■ 0 _ , , ci) a) ;_ ■ cp 2mLiti , . _ . c:. _Lo (...1 -.T.' ,C.... CD U) 3 ••,i. (/) _ —8 ,..1) — CD 0 cv a r 4:1) (,) 3 ; ; a) a) 1 1 n 0 ,- c , • .— c:ui , _ cts cz...1 0 C ■-•LO c) cria)F' I, — a) N - — • 0 a) --.r. CI) C-C C C 03 (/) 5 0 - ••• a) (I) o , ,, 0 — ._ cn_,_, o 1 0.—-c 0 •— •— ..0 ca '_.1 D 0 u_ ro E. 0 r ' TA A -- 0 :0 , 4) , tr), Tn" ' 2 . 17.1 c) 0,,, C ...5 1 co -0-fa 1 , z CD U)c‘i , 0 V .0 c 1 I r C3, Cl) 00 a) a) c ' = ii-).0 ; •••••• (I) 1 1 3 ci)- g 1 , , a)ci) (/ N ii.0 o )0 _C ' 0 LC) 0 LO 0 ul 0 If) 0 LO C:) LO 0 ul C) ul 0 LC) CD Lc) o Ln o up o ' , o cv LO N o CNJ LO N o cv LO N o cv to N o (v u-) N o (v to) N c) , >,03 0 Cl) • • • " • " • • " " • " " • • • • • • _ Iti 0=2 0 0, 0 0, ,-1 ,-1 ,--1 ,-I N N N N c•-) c)-) c•-) r•-) ..).. sr -:4, •zr )1-) Lr> Lr) if) 1/4.0 0 U) .4'71. C.)Z--I >,,. .,. 1 . rr- ...., c) _ C ■ 0 { _ C . 00C 09Z oOz 091. 001. 09 0 I / 6 ltd A L � 1 •r� 'I ti -Q ��l1 � � �11� q,�3 Isv 1�'.l a z i � �,� r: ,-.-. �e't� c��✓G� y� _ flg ,i,'4'.', c1: 1 2'3 I+ 1 '2 'z\ �' 1.24 ''tom b ' / t f r rr l ar r I t 2i n 5 i I I 1i a I �, I ` ,G ,ip��, 1711 ��� �� + { 11� " �n G" 1 1 i s 5 \ 1 t� �� /1"T:( .-,.-"-5::',..-.:-.'./.--- ';/,'?'.r� t JY _ t �"y ;t i � �I t � � ��A i r 1 �Ny �, A -r' 00 8- e�b.es y.V (Ir � " yr ? v �':�[ '. '`''• 4\ �� »�--,l,/ ! T. � •,� ; I ',i I n / .ark rl• ''''''4 y qty a �� r r i 1� 4;14H/ +sP ° a �. /1 F f' ll� Sc 7---2-l� �� �X t/ e ( �r a �..r ,i'- :Y' � � t. �L. ■ f 1,1/_ �� i "- .l 'G �1�*� - i a i •4 nl is �. E ,1 0.l �?��r � 'I - i � `� ems, ?t) t l . a` { - �?tb i R';.; � 'r▪ o-a4.- r � (S `7.- a � �� �"� 4`x�`y ° I 1 Nl A 17,2',A iii �i � )1)111'.::;':'. � y Ili { � rl .d�1r` 1 L I t 1 fs r i ya ' l 'A ref ÷4,' v� �< ,l 11 tv .` 1 Z ;� �� 4- ,1 I Il j:i °/ �� '°"�▪ 1. r (.� I F ' L liti •21•• `" .,: i it g I r b 5 Ill sa >; -3 sv rl VA -1;%; 3l 511 .: L L � ! r r _ • .+ i ::� �.� ,T/� i,i �..,..'.a.,-"-.h<fm_�" 11 7 ti i tr j i/ '� I "''1 `li Site Location ��� � i 1 sue"" - / r r 1 I r i I 11 1 I i� I i I11 d'�` �r 1 �i 'Z I Il 1�'��a 7 'Y�',./.4r,:' i ,�4` r ( /4.(::::',. '> > Cil�� \ 1 i i r �� Yk r 7 0 1 9 /� 1 L ! O < ,„ . , ,,., ./.„ i cl � I rE 44 A �lr i ., t C )I (1 +b�Al ag� ■ .:�� I�: r ��Y �� vp Ill a j (V z�1 u�, J� �L / ( 1 / Jr ua / tr i �� 3'� ��' .I ��.'I � -(,� � �. �,�) a'� V 1 qr � I e J ,� 1 1 I I _ 1 I 4 Iraq 1 V•'�1 J �� , ( rn rOamP !•T� �� I �> � -V 1 E I '/ "� I' `.T 3?''' a :,1�� \.r -f': i� I 1 c �cf `z?l�lit �� N i� -{ � ffJJ (' i $ l r `1 p `�l . r a; r of r��� O /: <:''!.;'' <,?'-:'-:' �� - � x I I�I �•,� xl e rte'✓ : i�t� _:,�b � ,� � r � Tabook Pt � - �.J $i � Y ��c ,,,,','":7-4k1:24'4::::5','34.'fi'� � ` Q rl z .,''',.'.r.:.....-:-.,;:„.y 41 rt +' "'r,a `S fr t.Iri , N.7.,,, ,,„, „,„,...... .1.....'::.,1,..',' '''':4:1-'','--..' ''='1 . !''IV' •A\N i:.;4'' '1.-:,; :;,:,;',4.?,4:t::::'s , ,e�l,i U s°: ,ir r;,,,,;,»,,,,-- .'y-�f .•, CP� ,:.;y,. _.._ b, J -n ,`�, �• ^ O 0 Site Location Map �Ocrober2008 PROJECT NO. om Aspect rTSP 080029 consulting L earth+water °� Adachi Landslide rnPMB FIGURE NO. o www.aspectconsuliing.com a� • Toandos Peninsula,Jefferson County,Washington tea. _ 1 „,,,,,,,,,,:-,,,i..,,,:„,,,,, ,,,. .:•;,0 fj - '7'f';:).., (''..4hPi;:"i;k41i,•:: a limited liability company Q ■ t consut i As ect ring Lo* g (� ttng Project Number Boring Number Sheet 4 earth+water 080029-001-02 B-1 I 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth f N-value Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ Water Content * Material (feet) Type/ID g• Type Description Depth 0 10 20 30 40 5C _ (C) YO'0` Loose,slightly moist,silty,very sandy GRAVEL o°q (GM),trace organics. 1 — 00< - 1 CJ CJ 2— o D.< 00A0, —2 3 X 4 Stiff,moist, organ csry sandy SILT(ML) fine sand, -3 6 LOG ITEM 4— — I —4 5 I Page_- _1 o —5 m=24% 5 5 6— 7 A. At Grades to very moist. `6 7— 1 1 —7 ,X 8 1 8- 10 1 Grades to very stiff. 0 12 —8 9— — 1 —9 10— I m=29%, 5 / Grades to wet and stiff. —10 -200=63% 6 11— g I —11 I 12— I I —12 13— v 5 I 6 —13 7 Alk 14— _ I 1 —14 I _ 15— I 7 m=30% 6 —15 6 16— 7 I 7` I -16 17— I —17 18— 3 I 5 —18 o 19— — N \ \ —19 N 20— \\ 21 m=34% 11 —20 19 -, 21— 27 0. j Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). —21 w o 22— j —22 23— �8 29 /Grades to very moist. —23 0 a a 24— — —24 9 0 ce Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL m ® No Recovery T. Static Water Level x F ®Split Spoon Approved by:TSP °w Water Level(ATD) 0 Figure No. A-2 • Boring Log �Aspectconsultin9 Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-1 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 90+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth I Sample Tests Bbws/ N-value • Material Depth Elevation Borehole Completion Water Content%* Tye Description (ft) (feet) Type/ID 6� 0 10 20 30 40 50 T m=24% 9 I-/ 18 l 26— X 30 T j —26 27— LOG ITEM —27 28— j —28 Page O f 29— / —29 ° —30 30 X m=22% 11 18 30 —31 31— 32— Bottom of borehole at 31.5'bgs.Borehole —32 backfilled with bentonite chips. 33— —33 34— —34 35— —35 36— —36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— —42 43— —43 0 44— —44 N I d • 45— —45 a 5' o 46— —46 a. (3 0 0 47 —47 0 0 48— —48 0 a —49 °a 49— 0 0 J _ _ - -, O• Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL Cr °m ® No Recovery s Static Water Level = Approved by:TSP ®Split Spoon V Water Level(ATD) o Figure No. A-2 , • %Aspectconsulting Loring Log Project Number Boring Number - earth+water 9 Sheet 080029-001-02 B-2 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth! N-value A Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ Water Content%* Material Description De th (feet) 6" 0 10 20 30 40 5r Type (ft) Loose,wet,brown,slightly silty SAND(SP-SM), 1 — trace organics,fine sand. — 1 2— 3- 2 LOG ITEM EM -3 2 2 4— — 1 I —4 I 1 m=35%, 2 I —5 -200=9% 2 j 6— X 2 T —6 I 7— I I —7 — I 8— u 4 I 9— 2• � y 8 10- V m=26% 13 � � j —10 Hard,wet,dark gray CLAY(CL). 11— ` 25 \� / 1 Slow drilling. —11 — 12— ! / —12 — 8 / 13 15 20 4 Grades to ve moist. —13 14— ry I I —14 15— I m=28% 10 1 I —15 I $ 1 16— 18 I T I —16 17— I I —17 - 12 18— 2 I I / 0 ♦ —18 20 19— I o I N -19 —19 N 20— I a m=24% 10 I % —20 T —22 23—iI 24— o - - - ? Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL °m ® No Recovery s Static Water Level r F XI Split Spoon Q Approved by:TSP ° Water Level(ATD) w o Figure No. A-3 111 • ■It Boring Log ASpectconSUtting Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-2 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 82+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ Sample Tests Blows/ N-value • Material Depth Elevation Borehole Completion Sample 6" Water Content%* Type Description (n) (feet) 0 10 20 30 40 m=26% 13 18 26— li 1 ; ,, I _ r �r —27 27— �� " I / P � ,.. — —�}� —28 28— I ` L I III —29 I — o I 30 30— m-23/0 10 12 18 —31 31— I 6"of wet SILT(ML). 32 —32 33— Driller indicates gravel layer. —33 —34 _ o 3 5— 35 m-22/0 8 13 36— I 19 T —36 37 —37 38— —38 39— x-39 40- 11 m /0_ n —40 13 16 19 A —41 41— 42— Bottom of borehole at 41.5 bgs.Borehole -42 backfilled with bentonite chips. 43— —43 o 44— —44 8 N N 45— —45 m .0 0 o 46— —46 o- 0 47— —47 J a 0 48— —48 E 0 a 49— —49 0 0 z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL 2 ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level = Approved by:TSP 2 Z Split Spoon Q Water Level(ATD) 0 Figure No. A-3 all • IAS ect Boring Log p consulting Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 1 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence- Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 D N-value •• Elevation Borehole Completion Sample Tests Blows/ Material Type/ID Water Content%w Description Depth (feet) - 8` 0 10 20 30 40 I Type _ (ft) Loose,wet,brown,slightly gravelly,very silty SAND(SM),trace organics,trace wood. 1 — 1 2 —2 ri m=27%, 2 Stiff,wet,dark gray SILT(ML),trace sand,trace 3— -200=99% 2 organics. —3 4 — C 6 \ I \ —4 _ \ 5 I 15 \ Grades to very stiff. -5 13 \6— 7 —6 7 I \\ Grades to hard. —7 8— ``I 14 \\ 6"of sandy SILT(ML�).yG ITEM II * LO I -8 23 \ 9— I —9 \ Peof -10 10— m=24% 13 \ 24 50+\ 11- , 30 Trace fine sand. —11 12— I —12 14 13— 1 22 r 13 /27 14— ' / Trace fine sand. —14 15— / m=24% 14 // —15 A 23 16— ' 26 —16 1 17— I I I —17 1 18— I —18 I I 0 19— I —19 0 N N 20— I - 9 1 —20 18 I ° 21— , 26 4 0. 0 —21 u0 I no 22— I —22 o 23- I —23 a °a 24— I ° —24 S I (7 z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL ce 0 N Recovery 1 Static Water Level Approved b ill IN Split Spoon -V- Water Level(ATD) pp by: P w o Figure No. A-4 tti As ectconsun Boring Log p 9 Project Number Boring Number Sheet earth+water 080029-001-02 B-3 2 of 2 Project Name Adachi Residence-Landslide Ground Surface Elev 60+/- Location Driller/Equipment Geologic Drill/Track mounted rig_ Depth to Water Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Start/Finish Date 3/19/2008 Depth/ N-value • Sample Tests Blows/ Material Elevation Borehole Completion Water Content%* Description Depth (feet) Type/ID 6" 0 10 20 30 40 50 Type (ft) m=29%, 18 ' ( ,200=100% 31 47 50+1 ITEM sLQG IT..-M 26 Tip of sampler i `' —26 27— # Am. • ,,o., —27 28— Page of f —28 29— —29 N-value collected again at 31.5;no sample 30— _ m=21%, 11 retained. —30 X ,200=100% 24 38 50+ N-value(blow counts)possibly over-estimated 31— due to sampler flexing. —31 11 32— 20 so+ —32 31 33— — —33 Bottom of borehole at 33'bgs.Borehole — backfilled with bentonite chips. —34 35— '-35 36— --36 37— —37 38— —38 39— —39 40— —40 41— —41 42— --42 43— —43 w 44— —44 O N c 45— —45 a a 0 U o 46— —46 0 ui O 47— —47 J w 0 z 48— —48 ° a °a 49— —49 0 0 J z Sampler Type: PID-Photoionization Detector(Headspace Measurement) Logged by: JTL R 2• ® No Recovery 1 Static Water Level Approved by:TSP o ®Split Spoon Water Level(ATD) O Figure No. A-4 • • LOG ITEM Aspect Consulting Adachi Landslide 080029 Atterberg Limits 80 - 70 60 K CH or OH a) -a 50 p 40 v n 30 CO • a MH or OH 20 CL orOL A 10 - / C1-ML ML or OL 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Liquid Limit •8-125 •B-220 !B-310 Sample Number Depth ft As-Received Plasticity Liquid Plastic Limit USCS p p � � Moisture Content Index Limit 6-1 25 23.54 26.4 48.5 22.1 CL B-2 20 23.90 18.0 40.3 22.3 CL B-3 10 23.83 7.7 32.5 24.7 ML MP77 • LCi i I ►._.ivy Fags "I aeufd lueOJed 0 O <0 On O — c0 co O d' N O • I i . O to • N t . N j N T et C • 2 C' OOZ# T ��I� I o CO I o c CO 006# 1 E = 09# ` m :Q E r.N 014 o co i3 1 ILO c 'cc L 0 O L# I `- . ml 4# I O 1,8/E • 0 o I2/1. ■ T 116 i II • ■ o O O 0 T e . LOG ITEM v Page ii, of ,. _ , i . \ , JT3.....4'.. (1)'‘'''0 8 ...„ .4. \ , >, co \ , (.) c3) ,7) CO .;..,- C 0 _ 2U)D(...) - o • .0 E ..(2 co a) 1 , 0 a ■._ a) - 2c•*(/)-' ,:-7') o o a)N.- iii I , 0.... c F....F.. .. a 1 co U2a) (I) o 1 , u) a — *.t.-.) r 1 ...iU)D0u.. ; r 1 • r A W. —C4 ;;.7... i c , ., I El ' in I CI' '-I , I ca I a) ■ Q. 1 0 4) a --0- -c) , 7 C 7 , cri c , o .CC/) C.) o (1) a) u) o Lil o U) 0 tr) 0 to cp 0 c..) 4 0 in 0 in 0 ul 0 Lf-) 0 ir) o in 0 , (,)c) _c , I ° Lr' r-- ° ° N ° N I n r t.,.$4,. it leacri....,01z• .(c ,i , o6c 00E 09Z _____ 00Z Oil. 001, 09 0 • • o -tr) se) LOG ITEM # 2- Page 1 of ,ta ..... „ . , .,-- -0 -t5), III —..... sn_ D o __ >...-6-' -cp 0 A i c7)m c) lir) . ■.IL_) -ii-) ct) c co r:1) V a) :_. --- E N (1) 0 W •• i... U) (1) a) 0 c i ...-.,... 0••• = =• :-'. 0 C 0*C- 15 — U) L'' ' A ' :43 0. U) 0 I) ww\, -- . v C A -o C N cl •— L. .1..;v■ 0) v (T3 c U) "T.3 c).c() c ......;_-, "1"-r) $,) i:i o o c (...) C..)u- o 0 (1) = -4..co ...... -0 1 f\I 0.0 SSG1S' - 0 i eci 0 174 C •• 'LI (/) - < 0 oFti 8 8 I) ..., Lr, . „, o upoupoLooLnoLnou-) oLnou, c) ,0000 co -)ii < 0 C•1 LID r- 0 CV III N c) N In N 0 N u) N 0 (NI LO N 0 C-`,1 LID N 0 0 0000 ,--11-1 ,--11-INNNNMMMM ,Vcrcrcl. 01.01.110V) Lc) - ,....,. ■ _ , ')Ot7 00E 00Z 001. 0 • 0 LOG ITEM --0 ni- Page0-----------t0) . 0 c) L CO 0 - a) 0' ..... - , 'a.Q. 0 ■ . ; 0 _ .•—..tr. (0 ' _ [ co I •••c-7.)< I ■ (I)4.5(f) 1 o 0 ' = I......4_ _. , - I. - ..... , . ==._ •a.,) 0 , CV 0- k../ 'in- ' • ... e- , ,...:•-•..c , 1 3 1 lip : fa C 0 h a) I a) c P. "E r ,,- 0 al . .C) '0 ■ it) (n 0 , <- 0.) Ct.cre) (NI ■ . .__ (.i) .. a) CO ,(f) a).o --- I a) -d) o -c c.) -5 .- CD —JDOU- ..... U) _ 13) , 0_ 0 c n A -I (I) (/) : 0 "CS I Li) .— , r 12 "0 (r° cr)' — r E ..-.,■••••CO ' ' 0 ' C•1 ci.s.7 , r "t:1 ' _e5 a)L. ', •E4 v- 12); A r I-c--3' I- w a) a) c I I- I a o r.:L. a)u) (..)n c...)Lt. 11 r_ r co C\I Cit o r -0 r 0 .._c , 0 is) o tr) o Lc) o Ix) o Ln o tr) o Is) 0 II) 0 tr) o u") o tr) o Lr) cz:— C'4-',,, ocvLo N 0 l‘l Li-) NoNtr) NocvLr) Nocqu) NocvLr) No >,CO o '. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CIS 0-+•-■2 10000 ,--, ,-, .---ir-INC\INC\IMC*) 0") r,-, Tr .cr .a. .4. ul in tr) L.r) t.c, I c58 . , 1 0 z_1 >,,, . ■ — 0 i- c 0 0, ! '7. o "i----7- z — J — ---- z i." . 00£ 0 oO o 001- 09 0 • eV LO a008060S00AWAWI$1 W 6200110uP.1.0i L N Aso O /v"i 1 < R C s E j .2 g. _U 2 1 d G? U y� J`m It Z~2 -ft a_ c <« pW4G ` c p CW � - 'd! m s po L-1 >- F—I _. LU > mr p u CC ..+ = F . (n Va - _ < 0 .4C , < 0- ,y 0 d `` 1-r--�----1� a O o 1-� a >- 10 , WQ �x Ivy :8�=.Q. W Cl) =zQtO Iz M ~� <° (n U 1 `` °� = <La - I JYngggSSS g nWga Wt?' i I \\ F< = 1 I A.:."1 it <Ozt, - y , W O W Z g g €e g a �� � ��. fi t m 3i In -� I ,i` m flil i, ;` : ` I. NW ‘1144 1, ki_________Z:1, ---.____ --'.1 o El ilW tit? i ' is , ■ Irilli fr. IF 2 talii � l y 1 � ae € a 7. a z€ a 5 is 1,1 i5 I ■ ■ gsoN ° • JEFFERSON •LINTY , , � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti SCI 621 Sheridan.Street p Port Townsend, WA 98368 HIND' Al Scalf, Director LOG ITEM June 14, 2010 SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE Page / of 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 1253 DEER CREEK RD CASE#: MLA10-00155 Dear SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project Since the time of the pre-application conference, some regulatory changes have occurred that affect this proposal. Based on recent state legislation, the marine waters of Dabob Bay are now regulated as a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA) under Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). In Jefferson County, FWHCAs have a 150-foot buffer, which is measured horizontally from the ordinary high water mark. Since this project is proposed within the 150-foot FWHCA buffer, a mitigation plan must be submitted to Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) for County review and approval. There are two mitigation approaches to be considered: (1) prepare a critical areas stewardship plan (CASP), based on Article IX of Chapter 18.22 JCC or (2) apply for a reasonable economic use variance (REUV), as per JCC 18.22.090. Please find enclosed a copy of a handout that explains both of these permitting processes in more detail. The first step would be to determine if the CASP permitting process could be used; if not, the REUV process would apply. Although a pre-application conference was conducted prior to submittal of the shoreline application, it is recommended (but not required) that a CASP pre-application meeting be conducted onsite. For a CASP pre-application meeting, I would meet with a biologist that you hire to determine if the CASP permitting process is appropriate. A copy of a CASP pre-application form has also been enclosed should you decide to proceed with this pre-application meeting. This property is mapped by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) as a bald eagle shoreline buffer, and WDFW requires that a bald eagle management plan be submitted. Attached is a one-page bald eagle management plan. If the proposal meets the criteria in the checked box, please sign and return to DCD. If you have questions about bald eagle management plans, contact Jeff Skriletz by phone at 360-427-2164 or by email at Jeff.Skriletz @dfw.wa.gov. The quantity of fill material specified in the JARPA and Environmental Checklist does not match the quantity shown on the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet. Please identify the cubic yards of each type of fill material (e.g., 1-2 man rock, geogrid fill, 2-3 man rock, access road, etc) and present the total volume of fill material needed for the proposal. The total volume on the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet should be revised, as appropriate. Also, the total square footage of land-disturbing activities presented on the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet does not appear to agree with the extent of alterations shown on the site plan. Check the area of disturbance calculation and revise, as appropriate, on the Stormwater Calculation Sheet. Cross section B-B' shows a six-foot vertical drop at the interface of the Geogrid MRE and the 1-2 Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning 360 379-4450 FAX: (360) 37 -4 ( ) ( ) 9 451 air Mt-A/0-000S' • • Pa�2•�'y LOG ITEM Page '9-- of_ man rocks. Confirm that this is correct or revise the site plan. Clarify if any heavy equipment will be used on the shoreline as part of this project. If so, provide information on type of equipment to be used, how it will access the shoreline, and how long it will be placed on the shoreline. Please be aware that forage fish habitat occurs in places along the shoreline of Dabob Bay and that forage fish habitat is also a FWHCA in Jefferson County. Activities associated with stabilization of the slope that have the potential to affect forage fish habitat would require mitigation. Finally, please include a copy of the Site Plan, Cross Sections, Details, and Notes sheet that has been reduced and can easily be reproduced. If you have any questions, I can be contacted by phone at 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by September 12, 2010. Pursuant to Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.40.110(3) and (6), if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, 6--et- iepartment of :,;;, nity Development Staff c: File SEALEVEL BULKEAD BUILDERS INC C'p • • (4".sk'94'N pl4k1 JEFFERSON. COUNTY l D` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,.c4. 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 I+9 0`L— 360/379-4450 ^' 360/379-4451 Fax LOG ITEM CRITICAL AREAS Page of '` What are critical areas? Critical areas include all of the following: aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas(FWHCAs), and wetlands. These areas are regulated in Jefferson County(as required under the Growth Management Act)so that the natural environment can be preserved and human health and safety can be protected. Of the five critical areas listed above, FWHCAs and wetlands have buffers to help protect the functions and values that these resources provide. What is a buffer? A buffer is the area immediately adjacent to a FWHCA or a wetland, and the width of the buffer is based on specifications listed in Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code(JCC). Jefferson County Code requires that development avoid critical areas and associated buffers if possible. If development cannot be designed to avoid these resources, then development impacts are to be minimized to the extent possible and mitigation shall be provided. What happens if a buffer cannot be avoided by development? If a proposed project cannot avoid a critical area buffer, there are three ways that may be used to approve an application: 1. Administrative Buffer Reduction. An administrative reduction can be used to reduce or average the prescriptive buffer widths for FWHCAs and wetlands, assuming the buffer width reduction does not exceed 25%of the prescribed buffer width. The prescribed buffer widths for FWHCAs are specified in Tables 18.22.270(1)and 18.22.270(2)of the Jefferson County Code, while the prescribed buffer widths for wetlands are presented in Tables 18.22.330(1)through 18.22.330(3). A Habitat Management Plan or a Mitigation Plan would be required by Jefferson County as part of project permitting. 2. Critical Areas Stewardship Plan (CASP). A CASP may be used to reduce or average buffers. This process is an alternative to the Administrative Buffer Reduction described above, and additional information about CASPs can be found on the other side of this sheet. 3. Reasonable Economic Use Variance(REUV). If a buffer cannot be reduced or averaged by either of the two ways discussed above, a REUV would be used for project permitting. A REUV would also be used if a proposed development impacts a FWHCA or a wetland. To approve an REUV, a Habitat Management Plan or Mitigation Plan would be required by Jefferson County. How do l know if there is a critical area on my property? Jefferson County has mapping that indicates the potential locations of critical areas within the County. If you know your parcel number and you have computer access, you can view the critical areas that have been mapped in the vicinity of your property. The following link can be used to view County mapping: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/; click on the 'Maps'tab;then click on 'Critical Areas'; then enter your parcel number in the lower left corner and click on 'Go'. Note that Jefferson County mapping can only indicate if a critical area has the potential to occur on your property, and an evaluation by a qualified professional may be needed for permitting. g:\permitcenter\###forms###\drd forms\current drd forms\casp information handout_fina1060110.doc REV. 6/1/2010 1 • LOG ITEM 'age of CRITICAL AREAS STEWARDSHIP PLAN (CASP) What is a CASP? A Critical Areas Stewardship Plan, or CASP, is a way for an applicant to reduce a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area(FWHCA) buffer or a wetland buffer. A GASP is a report that is prepared based on site-specific conditions and is used for permitting of residential development. The intent of a CASP is to include property owners in decisions that affect their property while still protecting the functions and values of critical areas on and in the vicinity of their property. When can a CASP be used? An applicant may be able to submit a GASP for permitting if the proposed project cannot avoid a FWHCA buffer or a wetland buffer, and if all of the following are met: • The applicant is proposing residential development; • The property is'/4 acre(10,890 square feet)or larger; • The CASP is being used only for FWHCAs or Wetlands(Category II, Ill, and IV wetlands and Category I wetland buffers, but not Category I wetlands); • The fill materials used for development will be placed outside the FWHCA or wetland;and • The GASP provides equal or greater protection of critical area functions and values than that provided by the prescriptive buffer width. GASP requirements are specified in Article IX of the Jefferson County Code(JCC), which includes JCC 18.22.460 through JCC 18.22.550. These sections of the JCC state what needs be included in a CASP for permitting purposes. How do I know if a CASP will work for my property? If you think a GASP may be applicable to your project, you may request an on-site meeting with Jefferson County staff to discuss the GASP process in greater detail. To request an on-site meeting, complete a GASP Pre-Application Conference Form Request and submit it to Jefferson County Department of Community Development along with the pre-application fee. Be sure to fill out both sides of the form and attach a conceptual site plan showing your proposal. It is suggested that you invite your project biologist to attend the meeting as well. How do I apply for a CASP? To apply for a GASP, the following needs to be submitted to Jefferson County Department of Community Development: • A Master Permit Application (check the Critical Areas Stewardship Plan box); • A GASP report that addresses JCC 18.22.461 through JCC 18.22.530; and • A check for the GASP review fee. More Questions? If you have any questions about critical area permitting, contact the Jefferson County Planner of the Day at 360-379-4450. g:\permitcenter\###forms###\drd forms\current drd forms\carp information handout_fina1060110.doc REV. 6/1/2010 2 t • • LOG ITEM # 3 N c° JEFFERSON COUNTY Page C °f -- �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . '1 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 �! C 360/379-4450 -- 360/379-4451 Fax CASP Pre-Application Conference Request Form A property owner has the option of requesting an on-site meeting with Jefferson County Development Review Division Staff to discuss the potential for using a Critical Areas Stewardship Plan (CASP) as part of the permitting process to reduce a buffer associated with a wetland or a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application;and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws,regulations and land use plans. NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:(HOME) (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:(HOME) (WORK) T ,. ..,. .;�. .,—:..,. t i - a ':: • LOG t�^,�, i+T III LOG I t EM Property Description � of General Location: I__ Legal Description(from Property Tax Statement): 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): Total Acreage: Zone: %Lot Coverage: Applicant ❑ Owner ❑ Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description Property Owner(name and mailing address): Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. (LANDOWNER SIGNATURE) (DATE) g:\permitcenterV###forms##IAdrd forms\rasp pre-app conference form_final.doc REV.7/25/2008 Page 2 1 t ?A1j ' 4 ` LOG ITEM a ire: a Of. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act(RCW 77.12.655) and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules(WAC 232-12-292) - Not for Subdivisions,Short Plats,or Conversions Bald Eagle Territory: Occurrence#���� Nest# / Proposed Activity: CONDITIONS:All known bald eagle nest trees(active or alternate)and winter roost sites are protected. y''The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: CONDITION 1: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch frees, all na e conifers and all black cottonwood frees >24 inches diameter at breast height (diameter 4.5 feet from ground,known as d.b.h). Also retain>50% of coniferous and cottonwood frees<24 inches d.b.h. and>6 feet tall,with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest tree. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. ❑ CONDITION 2: This parcel is located>400 feet and < 800 feet of a bald eagle nest or within 'A mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline. Retain all known perch frees,and 75% native conifers and cottonwoods >24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance,or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above ondition 'laced op Parcel#Ze 0/ 03 g, CO26 with a s t r e e t address of . 1 , , ,ne,k- - .i awl i., i; ,.If the conditions set forth above are acceptable,please sign •elow and this will serve your Bald Eagle anagement Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. / WDFW Regional Wildlife Manager Landowner Signature (Date) Landowner Print Name City/County Official (Date) Address Send Copy To: City,State,Zip - Jeff Skriletz,District Wildlife Biologist WDFW Region 6, 48-B Devonshire Rd. Montesano,WA 98563-9618 Phone Fax:(360)249-1229 ' C • sox co JEFFERSON COUNTY ����' , , �� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT W vb1-C 621 Sheridan Street ,e' Port Townsend, WA 98368 LOG ITEM PIING Al Scalf, Director # Page of June 14, 2010 SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 1253 DEER CREEK RD MLA#: MLA10-00155 Dear SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, i / ,Department of C. 'ity Development .1 c: File SEALEVEL BULKEAD BUILDERS INC PO BOX 375 KINGSTON WA 98346 Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 t • • LOG TEM Page of 9 June 14, 2010 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA10-00155 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. Location: Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or by June 28, 2010. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extensioj of time o • ve additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, If t j X �i. F nj, l f V f/ • Donna Frosthoim From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 8:40 AM To: 'Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc.' LOG ITEM Subject: RE:Adachi MLA10-00155 4- Thanks for the update. Page / of_/ From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. [mailto:sealevelbb @silverlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 10:42 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi MLA10-00155 Donna, I just wanted to touch base and let you know that the Adachi's will be in contact with the staff at Marine Surveys and Assessments for assistance on the CASP process. We are hoping to keep the ball rolling! Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer, Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax 1 • • Donna Frostholm LQG 'ITEM From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:21 PM To: 'Meg Amos' Page of Subject: RE: CASP Meg: We have full CASP reports that have been submitted, but the review is not complete. We do have a mitigation report that was prepared as a CASP, but due to changes in the proposal,the County ended up using the report as a Habitat Management Plan for an administrative buffer reduction to a FWHCA buffer. To review that report, go to the Jefferson County website(www.co.iefferson.wa.us),click on Laserfiche Weblink Document Search. When the Laserfiche Weblink window opens,click on Permits,then click on Special Reports,then click on Habitat Management Plans. Within that file, look for a report with the parcel number 002352005. That report would be the closest we have to a CASP at this point. The report will probably not be available for review until tomorrow. From: Meg Amos [mailto:mamosdam @gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:23 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: CASP Thanks Donna, I did not realize that you had already done a site visit here. Amy made an agreement with Sealevel to do the mitigation part of this project, and I did not get details before she left. I'm sorry to bother you so much with information that I should already have. My only CASP experience is Jeff Holt. Is there an example of a CASP report that I can look at? I do appreciate all of the help and advise you've provided. Meg On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:14 PM,Donna Frostholm<dfrostholm(a@co jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Meg: I am the planner reviewing the Adachi application so I am familiar with the proposal. Mitigation is needed because the applicants are working within the 150-foot fish and wildlife habitat conservation area(FWHCA)buffer. Based on my site visit,there was no wetland in the project area. In the Jefferson County Code,Tables 18.22.270(1)and(2) list fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas that are regulated in Jefferson County. Areas with which federally-listed species have a primary association is a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area with a 150-foot buffer(see Table 18.22.270(2)). All marine waters in Jefferson County have the potential to be a primary association for federally-listed species so this parcel would have a 150-foot buffer from OHWM. 1 There is no FWHCA layer in the Jeffe41)County mapping that you can click on. lever,the following map layers will help you determine if the proposed project is in a FWHCA or FWHCA buffer: • Shorelines-Arcs: click on this; if a colored line appears,then it is a shoreline that could be a primary association for federally-listed species. • DNR Streams: click on this; if a Type S (shoreline)or Type F(fish)stream comes up,then the stream likely serves as a primary association for federally-listed fish species. LOG,ITEM • LFA-Fish: click on this; if a line appears,then salmonid species use the stream. Page For this particular project,make sure you have a site plan that shows all of the proposed activities within the FWHCA buffer. The site CASP and plan should show the 150-foot FWHCA buffer line. If I remember correctly,the site plan showed construction of an access road to the work area. The CASP would need to address all ground-disturbing activities within the FWHCA(construction access, stockpiling materials, etc.), not just the area where the slope will be stabilized. It may be possible to use a CASP as FWHCA buffer mitigation if it meets the following from JCC 18.22.461: (1) the project is to stabilize slopes for a single family residence so this requirement is met; (2) the property is greater than 1/4 acre so this requirement is met; (3) the CASP would be prepared for a FWHCA so this requirement is met; (4) the CASP that you prepare must demonstrate equal or greater protection or this requirement would not be met—if this requirement is not met,then the applicants would have to go through the Reasonable Economic Use Variance process; (5) n/a since there are no wetlands on the property; (6) if there is no fill proposed below(waterward)of the OHWM,this criterion is met; (7) n/a; and (8) n/a. You may want to contact me if you get a site plan that shows fill material below the OHWM or if you do not think that the mitigation proposal(CASP)can show equal or greater protection of the FWHCA. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD 2 From:Meg Amos [mailto:mamosdamgrail.com] Sent:Thursday,August 26,2010 12:14 PM To:Donna Frostholm Subject: CASP LOG p-EM Hi Donna, 'age Can I determine if a property is in a Habitat Conservation area by looking at the map layers? Is the Wildlife and Habitat layer the one that would answer my question? I know I can find wetlands this way. I am specifically looking at parcel # 601032020. The only wetland mapped is along the shoreline and there is no Wildlife and Habitat area mapped there. If I am reading this right, a CASP would not work for this site, correct? Thanks, Meg 3 S Donna Frostholm From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. [sealevelbb @silverlink.net] LOG ITEM Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:22 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Page ( of Thank you Donna. I am waiting to hear back from the biologist but should by the end of today. Will keep you posted. Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer, Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. (360) 297-2401 (360)297-2308 Fax Original Message From: Donna Frostholm To: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:10 PM Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: I can extend the deadline to 30 days(or more) if that is what you need. As long as you are working on it, I am willing to extend the deadline. Once you hear from your biologist, let me know how much longer you will need. Thanks for keeping me updated. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. [mailto:sealevelbb @silverlink.net] Sent:Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:02 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, I got your message about the extension. I am waiting to hear back from the biologists on their estimate for the completion...would 30 days be acceptable?Appreciate your help! Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer, Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax 1 LOG ITEM • • # —1 Donna Frostholm page_ �f `7 From: MSA[marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] —� Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:35 AM To: Meg Amos; Bill Matthews; Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc.; Donna Frostholm Subject: Fwd: Fw: Adachi Ok,all, it looks like we're on for an Adachi site visit on Tuesday, October 5th! What timing would work best for everyone? Meg, I think you should have first pick since I know you have childcare issues. I can make it any time that day. Thanks! pema Forwarded message From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. <sealevelbb @silverlink.net> Date: Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:19 AM Subject: Fw: Adachi To: Amy Leitman<marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com> Perna, Donna has authorized our new deadline to Oct 29th and is available to meet on site on Oct 5th. What time would work for the meeting? Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer, Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Original Message From: Donna Frostholm To: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:13 PM Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: The October 29 deadline is fine. I can be on site Tuesday morning—I would need to be back by 12:00. Donna Frostholm 1 • . From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. [mailto:sealevelbb @silverlink.net] Sent:Monday, September 13,2010 1:44 PM LOG ITEM To:Donna Frostholm -----___ Subject: Re:Adachi Donna, Based on discussions with the biologist,we would like to request a deadline of October 29th for the additional requirements. Also,would you be available to meet on site with ourselves and the biologists to walk through the project on Tuesday Oct 5th? Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer,Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Original Message From:Donna Frostholm To:Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. Sent: Tuesday, September 07,2010 12:10 PM Subject:RE:Adachi Jenny: I can extend the deadline to 30 days(or more)if that is what you need. As long as you are working on it, I am willing to extend the deadline. Once you hear from your biologist, let me know how much longer you will need. Thanks for keeping me updated. 2 • • Donna Frostholm LOG ITEM Associate Planner Page aft Jefferson County DCD From: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. [mailto:sealevelbb(csilverlink.net] Sent: Tuesday,September 07,2010 12:02 PM To:Donna Frostholm Subject:Adachi Donna, I got your message about the extension. I am waiting to hear back from the biologists on their estimate for the completion...would 30 days be acceptable?Appreciate your help! Best regards, Jennifer Rotsten Officer,Permit Manager Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. (360)297-2401 (360)297-2308 Fax Amy Leitman and Pema Kitaeff Marine Surveys&Assessments 267 Hudson Point Port Townsend, WA 98368 Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 or 206 349-9977 Fax: 360 385-2188 3 S4110 av I.0 620090.-0,020.1.1.10.101.PV EiX0801,001....12 1 1 1 4 4 in LOG ITEM # 41 :I 2 ' .1 02 Page . of i i .. 1(,‘ es g e 'g, a a t., Nzt 1 ...1. .„ 1114 i 11 Z 0 eVI 5 I 'k4 i Z 0 3 15,2 I SI>T ., t , It: e c ill - 1 I ' 11 li it 1 a-- - .I•i a-a i 1, A 42-- I el e ig "1.4- ",+' I— II (.1,,, u 3 ii --- -4'"' -4 I. I/1, i ii I , 6 1 f 02. V tot' 1E qi I 43 it- 11 :t. 11 lib II 1111 ea 1113 K, . Pii 1611Fii; Pil •••.'1-7," s 2,i k,ipw',.. i a3.1 n I 1 — m mit? ‘ giT> it: i i I: I I i a ,) k 2 t. 9 11 1 .9... 4e R 8 8 8 it 2 2 . geese I e e , ... 111 ..... , 0 ,...........___, I .1 \ i.., \ I .' - -- 1 llo li I 1 ' ' H III .'•_.- - -- ILI N I '. I i C- ' it 1 ‘,. , II ' . ,..—....._____ • I t). t i. \ \ , ;. ' t'I 1 ,! %,_I I 1 I 1. A ' Nt , N. I , IIII i I 14.1 JI 0 ,,i f■le,I LAIA it 1 fi, . ..,'''' ' hq.'4 -- ii DI 1 21, I 1 Z I,- N ii IA I g 1 i 41 (A'-,,,i»d - - I -„ 711-11 a a u ...w. I 'P - - _ -iC 1 II ft 11111 i,., Y i t c L.2 it 1,1.: ill te l' I I I 1 1 ' " „ ii lb pi , , \ h ft Z 11 pti I ..,°\.',;„`.\\\'`.' .:.,,..1 5, N ill i , ., z'" •-\\ :'" — ..,...,...,,,,,- •,. 1 I ,„. :4 E I iti ii -1, • 1/4'.'..'. to it IN. h-..1 , z ,.... . - II im ...I 0 Ai ,0 1 „ J J ill rip 1* i 11'0111 hill -* \ 1 R i ;I ° (-)J ! 111` . .,0 A A --' w 2 , • Kee I. iih le. '‘ a , -,, it , „,„ n 14., \ ....._ V 14 pi ... 2 Ils 1 t I id ill p if Thet-I , 3 .. - .,„ $) , -,- 91 ' , :2 R z• e. g _ - I ! „,,,,,,i,14-•/- /,_ -t- , ,,,z) -` .7- 2 1 ....r....„ ; i ii ii ra 2 2; e 3 LI Itg 3.42-g 2 t',1 3 - , , ;,- ::- -+" ; ' 11 75 .F„ 12 1? a ili VT12 ;:g: 7lig" ---,... ..- '‘'''' -I' t;1, 1 CI 6. -41 Hifi 14.i --.0 ' I 3 ' '' It.' ' -7 -LI ',,. ',,.'‘ -; `-: '7 ", ": / - " " ' 2 - " .) .. ) - ,.,- • • Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm LOG ITEM Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 3:29 PM To: 'MSA'; Bill Matthews; Meg Amos Subject: RE: revised critical areas bond quantity worksheet Perna: See responses below. Sometimes I can be a bit"wordy" so there may be more than you really wanted to know... From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:31 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Bill Matthews; Meg Amos Subject: Re: revised critical areas bond quantity worksheet Hi Donna, thanks for your message last week! Meg, Bill, and I are meeting today to go review the CASP Reporting Requirements in preparation and a couple of questions have come up so far: 1. 1-inch margins like you mention below sound fine -but do you mean before OR after the document is bound?, and, Before the document is bound. Jefferson County will remove any binding and run the sheets through a scanner. 2. The fifth item on the "CASP reportling requirements" checklist is "Locations of Habitats of Local Importance". Because this term is capitalized, it sounds like an official designation-what does it mean' exactly? Like, in the case of Adachi, is the stream a Habitat of Local Importance? Is that the shore? Jefferson County does not have any Habitats of Local Importance at this time. It is a type of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area(i.e., a Critical Area regulated under Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC)). It would be used if it was determined that there were important habitat areas in Jefferson County that had not already been identified by the State. Since we do not yet have any Habitats of Local Importance in Jefferson, that requirement would not be applicable for any the Adachi proposal. 3. In the 10th item,we're a little unclear on the definition of"critical area" - does this refer to the shore or to the Ordinary High Water line (and then the buffer is the 150' above that)? The only critical area that occurs in the Adachi project area that would need to be addressed in the CASP is the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area. For the Adachi project, the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area would be the area waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark. The 10th item is asking that the area within 150 feet landward of OHWM be described(e.g., for the Adachi project: common or dominant species on the slopes in the area to be stabilized, types of vegetation present around those portions of the property that have been developed, which portions of the 150-foot buffer are dominated by native vegetation and where non-native or invasive species occur). In general,things to consider when describing the buffer in a CASP could include: • is the area dominated by native or non-native species?or is it patchy?; • are there trees?; if so, is there a well developed understory?; • is the area densely vegetated or are there patches of vegetation interspersed on the property?, • if there are steep, slopes are they vegetated or not; if there is an area that is relatively flat, is the vegetation different that what is on steep slopes?; • has previous site development has resulted in most of the vegetation being cleared?; • does the buffer appear to have been recently cleared; and 1 • are there any other habitat fillrres that may be present(such as snagsewned woody material)?. Just as an FYI, all Critical Areas area included in Chapter 18.22 of the JCC. They are: Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas, Frequently Flooded Areas, Geologically Hazardous Areas, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, and Wetlands. The Adachi CASP is to address construction within the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area buffer(because all marine waters in Jefferson County have the potential to provide habitat for listed species). 4. In the 14th item, what are "performance standards"?, and, Once the potential impacts to the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area have been determined and a mitigation proposal identified,then performance standards need to be presented. Performance Standards are the quantifiable criteria that will be used during annual monitoring of the mitigation area. Examples are: plant survival rates by monitoring year,plant cover by monitoring year, percent cover of non-native species in monitoring area, etc. Additional information on performance standards is in the link below, beginning on page 43 of the report: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0606011b.pdf. 5. For the Adachi project, do we need to propose a stormwater plan? No,that is being taken care of by Sealevel Builders and the engineers. LOG S M you Y y Thank for your help! '' Page of Pema On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Donna Frostholm<dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Pema,Bill, and Meg: It was nice to meet Pema and Bill, and see Meg again, at the meeting on the Adachi property. At an on-site meeting recently, it was noted that the worksheet does not include a line for on-going maintenance of the mitigation area so I just updated the critical areas bond quantity worksheet to include prompts for annual maintenance. A copy is attached. And,just a reminder that the CASP you prepare along with the worksheet will be recorded at the JC Auditor's Office as part of permitting and that state law requires anything that is recorded have a one-inch margin on all four sides of the sheet. Would it be possible for you to have a one-inch margins on each sheet of the CASP? Let me know if you have any questions, Donna/f ro thal vw Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist 2 Jefferson County Department of Comity Deveoopment • 621 Sheridan Street LOG ljt EM Port?bwnsend, Washington 98368 Page ofd dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Amy Leitman and Pema Kitaeff Marine Surveys & Assessments 267 Hudson Point Port Townsend, WA 98368 Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 or 206 349-9977 Fax: 360 385-2188 3 • • Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:00 AM To: 'MSA'; Meg Amos; Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc.; BID Matthews Subject: RE: Adachi Extension d ` +Il '0 Hi Pema: I will extend the deadline until December 31, 2010. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:42 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Meg Amos; Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc.; Bill Matthews Subject: Adachi Extension Hello Donna, I hope you got the phone message I left earlier this week, and I'm writing now to confirm that we will need another extension for the Adachi project CASP. It seems likely that we'll get the new drawings we've been waiting for before the Thanksgiving holiday, and once they're in we can proceed with another site visit to establish the planting plan. I think a new deadline of December 20th may be appropriate; I hope we can talk again this coming Monday or Tuesday to make sure that will work for you. Thank you so much for your patience on this and I hope you have a good weekend, Pema Amy Lehman and Pema Kitaeff Marine Surveys &Assessments 267 Hudson Point Port Townsend, WA 98368 Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 or 206 349-9977 Fax: 360 385-2188 1 Donna Frostholm • LOG tii From: Jennifer Rotsten [sealevelbb @silverlink.net] -'_ 1 Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:26 PM - To: Donna Frostholm Pane of Subject: Re: Adachi Thank you Donna. I will get that to accompany the mailed copy of the paperwork I just sent to you via email. Hope to have it to you ASAP. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. (360) 297-2401 sealevelbb @silverlink.net From: Donna Frostholm Sent:Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:11 PM To: Jennifer Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: I received the CASP from MSA today. Please note that there is a $497 fee for CASP review. Please include a check and a Master Permit Application with the box for'Critical Areas Stewardship Plan' checked with your submittal (note: you submitted a Master Permit Application with the original signature; however,we need another one submitted for the CASP application). Let me know if you have any questions. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jennifer Rotsten [mailto:sealevelbb @silverlink.net] Sent:Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:37 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: s-adachi @comcast.net Subject: Adachi Donna, I have attached a copy of the remaining paperwork for the Adachi project you requested. Hard copy will also be in the mail. Once you have had a chance to review, let us know what the timeline from her is. Appreciate your assistance. Best regards, 1 Jenny Rotsten • 1..] s fW: ' l Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. �� � x (360) 297-2401 ,�, sealevelbb @silverlink.net _.2„.4._____ 2 i sW tail BULKHEAD BUILDERS &OG ITEM January 18,2011 #rte f rif3tr Donna Frostholm '_— Jefferson County DCD, Planner 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 RE: Site address:1253 Deer Creek Rd Case#MLA-10-00155 Dear Ms.Frostholm, In response to your letter dated June 14,2010 regarding the above mentioned project,this letter and its enclosures aim to fulfill your requirements for this submittal.The following is the punch list of required items for the permit and how we have supplied the requested material: • The Critical Areas Stewardship Plan(CASP):This has been completed and submitted to you by Marine Surveys and Assessments. • Bald Eagle Management Plan:The signed plan is enclosed for the file. • JARPA and Stormwater Calculation Worksheet:The JARPA has been revised.The name on the JARPA has been updated as Mr.Adachi has since passed away.Please note this change as needed.The completion of the CASP also changed the answers to 8c and 8d.Additionally,the answers regarding fill materials(6a,6d,8e,and 8f) have all been revised to detail the amount of fill from 1-2 man rock,2-3 man rock,geo-grid fill,and crushed rock for the access road.The total of these fill materials,+1-1097 cubic yards,has been noted on the revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet,page 1,as well.With the change to the access road,which now utilizes more of the existing driveway for access as opposed to impacting additional land for access,there is a change to the Total Land Disturbance.The revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet shows the updated square footage calculations for the rockery,slope,and total.Both the revised JARPA and Stormwater Calculation Worksheet are enclosed. • Cross Section BB:The plans,as originally submitted,are correct. • Equipment Use:There will be no equipment used on the beach for the proposed work.All work will be completed from behind the OHW mark. • Reduced Plans:A reduced set of revised plans has been enclosed. Please advise should you have any further requirements for the permit process for this project to proceed.Thank you in advance for your timely review. Best ards, Jen Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. (360)297-2401 Cc: Yoko Adachi,via email c/o Derek Adachi P.O. Box 375, Kingston, Washington 98346 • (360) 297-2401 • Fax (360) 297-2308 • -ITEM AGENCY It ONLY / 2 7 0 ' a Date received: * / a US Army Corps /, WASHINGTON STATE of Engineers o5i . Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BELOW. Part 1—Project Identification Ratikik 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [helpl2 Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2—Applicant The person or organization responsible for the project. [helpl 2a. Name(Last, First,Middle)and Organization(if applicable) Yoko Adachi 2b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2c. City, State, Zip Seatac, WA 98188-2313 2d. Phone(1) 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2g. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi @comcast.net Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b. of this application.) [help] 3a. Name(Last, First, Middle) and Organization (if applicable) Rotsten, Jennifer—Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3b. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box) PO Box 375 Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.amiy.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage_ESA Rig '' (fly, ` i�� • If you are applying for an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization you will need to fill out and submit an I..*li."�.rl for Aatt ri tidnAotLs/State- Owned Aquatic Lands form to DNR,which can be found at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/agr_use_auth_app.doc • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you think you will need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate 2 city or county govemment to make sure they will accept the JARPA. c *fir To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias_resourcecenter/jarpajarpa_form/9984/jarpa_form.aspx For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help @ora.wa.gov. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 1 of 14 1 ! ! 3c. City, State,Zip Kingston,WA 98346 3d. Phone(1) 3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3g. E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 sealevelbb @silverlink.net 2;0 ITEM ert 9` 4—Pro --- Part p Y Owner(s} ,3 Of 37 Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur-:-fheto]- �1 Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. 4a. Name (Last, First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) 4b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 4c. City, State, Zip 4d. Phone(1) 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4g. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ❑ State Owned Aquatic Land (If yes or maybe,contact the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)at(360)902-1100) ❑ Federal ❑ Other publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑Tribal ® Private 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 1253 Deer Creek Rd. 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene,WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 2 of 14 • • 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. (helot '/.Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [helot • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (NAD 83) LOG ITEM 4746'48.09" N / 12747'30.72"W �'- 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [helot �'-'— - • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) (helot Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) Jeffery& Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Alan &Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish, WA 98290 5i. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [helot N/A 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? [helot ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [helot Deciduous & evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos enclosed. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 3 of 14 L • 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [helot SFR LOG ITEM / P a g e 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] SFR 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s). [help] Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] From Hwy 104,turn onto S Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd, follow for 8.5 miles, turn left onto Coyle Rd, and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road all the way to the water. p- ( 111111 gg i g 3 y;r '.'. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 4 of 14 • • Part 6—Project Description 6a. Summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6d. [help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. Approximately +/-25 yards of 1-2 man rock, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill, +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock, and 30 yards of crushed rock will be installed. Geo-grid will be installed, spacing as per plans, see attached Tans prepared by Aspect Consulting. LOG ITEM /0-- Pa e 6 of • 6b. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial El Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6c. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Road ® Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Marina/ Moorage ❑ Stairs ID Boat Lift [1] Dock/ Pier [1] Mining El Stormwater facility El Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Bulkhead 11] Fence [1] Piling ❑ Utility Line ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Retaining Wall El Channel Modification ❑ Fishway (upland) ❑Other: 6d. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. [help] • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain. As shown on the plans,the slope will be cleaned of all organics; logs and root wads will be salvaged and used along the toe of the MRE wall when completed. Loose material will be removed from the slide area. The new toe will be excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions. Layer specified geo-grid and compact material as directed by geo-tech. The rock armor on the top of the slope will be placed along a >1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5'where <1:1, 1-2 man size rock may be used. The construction road will be created for access and left intact when work is complete. Drainage will be installed as needed based on engineer and/or agency requirements based on conditions. The access area will be re-vegetated once work is complete. Bare surfaces will be covered with temporary erosion control and native plantings completed for permanent erosion control along access, new reinforced slope, and mitigation/monitoring area. See plans and CASP for more details. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction'? (month/year) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: Spring 2011 End date: +/-14 day duration ❑ See JARPA Attachment D JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 5 of 14 • • 6f. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [helot A slide that occurred at the site during the winter of 2007-2008 removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The proposed work will restore and stabilize the slide area and prevent future slope instability. LOG ITEM l Page _0f a? 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $100,000.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help] • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑Yes ® No ❑ Don't know Part 7-Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If yes, submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. = ,,�, , a ❑Yes ❑ No �� 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [helpl JAN 2 7 2611 • If yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know It.. v'f t,''' ' 4 A� JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 6 of 14 7f. Ha ve you prepared a mitigation plan to com p ensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [he l p ] • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable LOG ITEM l9, Page_ g of,7 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [helot 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted; the extent and duration of the impact; and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state(below)where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area(sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq.ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 1 If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3lndicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h., describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [help] JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 7 of 14 • 7j. For all exca vatin g activities identified in 7h., describe the excavation mgod, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] LOG ITEM Page 0 of d,7 Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [helpi ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (if there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] ❑ Not applicable All work will be completed above the OHW line. Any work near the shoreline that requires access or close proximity to the shoreline will be completed at low tides. The proposed re-vegetation of the slope will enhance the habitat at the site. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help) E Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help] • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ®Yes Cl No ❑ Not applicable Please review submitted CASP for mitigation and monitoring. [}F T Try N 2 7 JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 1 11J tlitINTY Page 8 of 14 ! • 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g.,you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] LOG ITEM Please review submitted CASP - Page 64 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 impact3 to be placed in or linear ft.)of drive, etc.) removed from waterbody waterbody directly affected_ FILL:1-2 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW FILL: Geogrid fill Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-1017 yards landward of OHW FILL: 2-3 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW FILL: Crushed Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-30 yards rock landward of OHW If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2lndicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3lndicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e., describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [help] Fill will consist of: +/-25 yards of 1-2 man rock +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock +/-1017 yards of geo-grid fill, to be compacted to min 95% maximum of proctor std ASTM D-698/Source unknown at this time. +/-30 yards of crushed gravel for access road 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e., describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 H Page 9 of 14 O • N/A LOG ITEM Part 9-Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 Dec 2010 Department of Ecology Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? (help] • If yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/proprams/wa/303d/. ❑ Yes ® No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code(HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.Qov/surf/Iocate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.QOV/services/Qis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.QOV fPrOpramS/WQ/SwQS/criteria.html for the standards. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 10 of 14 ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable l_a_ 9fi. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [help] • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/proorams/sea/sma/laws rules/173-261211 desionations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.00v/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertvning.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [helol • If no,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ® Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [helpl SFR 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ❑Yes ® No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Salmon, bald eagle REd iL_ ., 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] 2 7 2011 JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 JEFFERSON ,1l%it 1441 fi xof 14 Unknown LOG ITEM gQf ?' Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecv.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or helpna,ora.wa.00v. • For a list of agency addresses to send your application, click on the"where to send your completed JARPA" at http://www.epermitting.wa.gov. I-2, 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) [help] • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/seoa/e-review.html. ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 12 of 14 • ® A SEPA determination is pendng with Jefferson County (lead agency)"fhe expe islodatfiJs7 ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.) [help] ❑This project is exempt(choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code(WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [helot LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Resources Use Authorization FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [helpl 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [helot I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 13 of 14 rizin Si nures Part 11—Autho g 9 LOG ITEM Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. Page l _z (7 11 a. Applicant Signature (required) [help',. I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoriz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initial) Applicant Da e 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [helot I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is trite, coirnplete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to stag work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authoriz :r•ent ((2-L:.k't(11%� Date 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) lhelpi I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA). People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call (877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 IARPA 2009 Page 11 of 11 • Mir. • is /9- WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act(RCW 77.12.655) and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules(WAC 232-12-292) Not for Subdivisions,Short Plats,or Conversions Bald Eagle Territory:Si1N---+ LOW.— Occurrence#/ •S Nest# / Proposed Activity: 6k\c 0,L.r CONDITIONS:All known bald eagle nest trees(active or alternate)and winter roost sites are protected. y•'The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: CONDITION 1: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch trees, all na e conifers and all black cottonwood trees>24 inches diameter at breast height (diameter 4.5 feet from ground, known as d.b.h). Also retain>50% of coniferous and cottonwood frees<24 inches d.b.h. and>6 feet tall,with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest free. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. ❑ CONDITION 2: This parcel is located>400 feet and < 800 feet of a bald eagle nest or within 1/2 mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline. Retain all known perch frees,and 75% native conifers and cottonwoods>24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance,or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan.Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed..Topping of trees is not allowed. �� I have read and understand the above ondition ,laced o // Parcel#(.e.0/ 03 Qc --6 with a street address of . y_' . _J'2'1 -- ' ?„'..f au r 'A.' 9'i-7 •If the conditions set forth above are acceptable,please sign •elow an• this will serve .� your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. /J' . Itill WDFW Regional Wildlife Manager L. ••o er Si g ature��.f' (Date) JX1Yttf(i✓ 1 'S - act Ie v-) cl�oc ( &its klt \' ' i 1 / Landowner Print Name City/County • ial (Date) �� Address KIN s bite) . (AM 6tti34(4) Send Copy To: City,Stat ,Zip 2 i ` � Jeff Skriletz,District Wildlife Biologist 2/a- WDFW Region 6, 48-B Devonshire Rd. po-z-q -z--90/ JAN Montesano,WA 98563-9618 Phone Fax:(360)249-1229 JEFFERSON COW "l l D JEFFERSWOUNTY ` "- = I A45,43e07446 4, ,, ,..„ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 „ ; 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax `'' www.cojefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Master Permit Application MLA: 10 - ,55 Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): 4 -a 1117 'tit Tax Parcel Number. Con 1 p'.Q2-O Property Size: (o.e1g (( /square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: ] -5 3 lew C.vt ,(2a Property Owner(s)of Record: -f nc 1r:t. ruS- e. Telephone: ?O( -. q -2.---4'-tI Fax: email:41- g, (a ua4,00• n Mailing Address: iq 722 340” c rC..- 5. - .c . uto4 arir1.$1? 2Z t. Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): ' 2ct4t k ail.Uwe t ri l- i0 U.l - Telephone: aO-ZctA-- 2-k-{0\ Fax: 3 oO-Zct." --2.3°% email: 5ectltre-i b Sttvewli vtK. Mailing Address: yt)X . 3 -, 164 c', u�t- iC 3` '' ��� What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building 0 Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) O Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** O Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management 0 Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** O Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** O Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference 0 Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate . .. a:U , j-/ .i,; • .w to act as my agent in matters relating to this/application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE A44 L.: ' j f J-4-ti Date: i/2-!zD 41 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the own !tiro� th p i tion packet may result in this permit being null and void. �-" ,, `'h � �L) I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this_perrmit I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives o is for he-sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the ap•'•- on that he or she wants prior notice. / Signature: -AO/A Al ✓ y G /L `r The action or- ions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans - .ble responsibility for>•herin•to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: A./ u.../.."4 i!l-re Date: 1(2-62/ ( G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • BUILDER STATEMENT • The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assu ing the responsibility of the general Contractor for the proposed project. g Signature: i. ' _ _ Ai 1/ 1. . Date: i 1 2i4/2-01 . L LOG IT E M GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR •NUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: l : MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: - CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: O New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer O Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System O Repair ❑ Masonry - SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well 0 Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: 0 Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: 1 Underground Tank 1 Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: 1 Heat Stove 1 Cook Stove 1 Woodstove 1 Fireplace Insert 1 Hot Water Tank 1 Pellet Stove 1 Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes I No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. M f +• -a ti ""�` ry � —0 li -r MA +sue + Square Foota•e Current P •.•sed 1` ., ,1 a�a a_e . ; * ��� t g m Main Floor Heated EH Bid App Review. 2 ' Floor Heated P'!".. ,4;0:- Consistency Review: Additional Section: Heated Basement 4 Plan Check fee: a. ■ '�1.29E # Unheated Basement _ ; State Surcharge fee: r Other Unheated 't- ,-:5' Pot Water Review fee- Garage/Carport WAr4;* '; SUBTOTAL Decks :T° " 911/Rd Approach fee: Other , `. , TOTAL: .L Receipt Number: N. 7R''''40",,,-' Cash/Check Number: ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Y T initrals I . ' rr1-, f(r l 010400 G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • • JEFFERSON COUNTY J + DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LOS, ITEM yr 4. 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 -- �j �, / L d�7 $ 360/379-4450.360!379-4451 Fax � �e 4� __ _ O http:f/www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmentl Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MIA# (001012-OW , PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: 4t46L(A DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as°small,""medium,"or large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel (9•a$ acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 309 I c-9 sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION.AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared,graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert a/+acres or more of Construction site for structures .6 sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. 0 sq/ft Circle: Yes Well,utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2%acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. 7....351- sglft buy Circle: Yes Lawn,landscaping,etb. 3 9-5 sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. ZC--03 sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed:t Total Land Disturbance JZZS sglt Cut '`500 Filltt tIOTT (cold) 11 [over] kik 4: JAN 2 7 Ail stormwater calc worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 §d,1 l !!1 N 1 I&TY Up • • • Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface In greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking tots or storage areas,concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packs materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. LUG earthen ITEM 77.1STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE % -� NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) '^ sq/ft Structures(all roof area) /34 0 sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks ---D-- sq/ft Patios ' C' sq/ft Patios • ZI sq/ft Solid Decks ` 0 sq/ft Solid Decks a o 0 sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc ` V sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads,etc ,-•-• $o O sq/ft Other sq/ft Other // sq/ft Total New sq/ft Total Existing n- b 7 qv sq/t TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* , Cn 7 412 sglft *This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: a e!o Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2--Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP) Best Management Practices(BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stomiwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. i also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. ,011!".41ird.4 9/16010 (LANDO ''I - •-AUTHO- ,A D REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) stormwater cats worksheet—REV.2/2012008 2 UIJ�. 1. J111all.7 I will. 1 1\1. V 11 , r1 • Project Planner: Master#MLA10-00155 Review Type oject Description CSP11-00004 I CASP FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. PRJ11-00015 SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. SDP10-00051 III SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. Primary: SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE Site Address: LOG 1T E,, YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 1253 DEER CREEK RD h 19223 34TH AVE S QUILCENE WA, 98376 r d`-_.......... SEATAC WA 981885313 Project Location: Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3,Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 Parcel Number: 601032020 S-T-R:3-26N-01W Total Acreag( 7 Legal Description S3 T26 RIW LOT 1(N114)SUBJ TO EASE V500/P97 Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 2 Planning Area: Flood Map(FIRM) Panel No: School 48 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Plot plan states"property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES NO Stream Type:YES NO Fish&Wildlife:YES NO Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NO Seismic: YES NO Landslide: YES NO Flood: YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate Risk Disconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_ Land Disturbing Activity ESA's_ Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport YES No MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required:Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other [ ] Building Height: 35' UBC Standard Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Indus 1: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% o Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rur a ustrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s)Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:sullect to septic&water consirairts/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: LOG[ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP 4} [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT --_ f... [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES INo parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 601032020 BLD10-00346 F 9/29/2010 12/27/2010 REPLACE GAS TANKLESS HOT WATER HEATER BLD95-00520 F 9/26/1995 12/7/1995 Garage SEP95-00383 F 1/23/1996 6/6/1996 NOW FILED W/SEP98-00255 CAR98-00226 F 11/30/1998 11/30/1998 mobile home installation SEP98-00255 F 5/18/1999 12/10/1999 SEP95-383 NOW FILED HERE BLD98-00504 F 5/20/1999 12/29/1999 single family residence MLA10-00155 CSP11-00004 P CASP FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. PRJ11-00015 P SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. SDP10-00051 P SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. PRE09-00034 M 12/15/2009 Slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. SOM98-00255 F BLD00-00047 F 1/20/2000 2/24/2000 PROPANE TANK INSTALLATION 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE • MLA10-00155 Date Time, Comments , ID-5 - It) 01.6 5W, 41\a-cr9aLevti LOG ITEM is 9 I:\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt January 31, 2011 VP•• VV, ! !•w••t\I, v v•vV• ••• •w, • •-.v-.•vv.v.-� •• Parcel 601032020 Printed: January 31, 201illv Cases Name Review Type Status Planner BLD10-00346 ADACHI TRUSTEE F Application Received: 9/29/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/29/2010 Case Finaled: 12/27/2010 REPLACE GAS TANKLESS HU I WATER HEATER No findings,conditions,or permissions found. BLD95-00520 ADACHI LOG ITEM Application Received: 9/18/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/26/1995 Case Finaled: j1/2/7/1995 Garage No findings,conditions,or permissions found. gage r BLD98-00504 ADACHI F —,- Application Received: 12/21/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/20/1999 Case Finaled: 12/29/1999 single family residence No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR98-00226 ADACHI F S THEISS Application Received: 8/5/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/30/1998 Case Finaled: 11/30/1998 mobile home installation 1.) The application was reviewed by Jefferson County Permit Center staff on 11-16-98 for the potential presence of critical areas regulated under the provisions of the Ordinance, and the following critical areas were confirmed as potentially present on the subject property: landslide hazard, streams, wetlands, shoreline, aquifer recharge area. 2.) Acting upon the above information, Jefferson County staff conducted a site inspection of the subject property on 8-20-98 and confirmed the existence of the following critical areas and/or their associated buffers on the property: shoreline, landslide hazard, streams, wetlands along shoreline. 3.) The fish and wildlife habitat area is entirely associated with the shoreline. The minimum buffer for fish and wildlife habitat area along the shoreline is 30 feet as measured from the beginning of the vegetation line along the beach. In this instance, the required fish and wildlife habitat area buffer is entirely contained within the landslide hazard area and its associated buffer and needs no additional consideration. 4.) The bluff height is approximately forty (40)feet. The required setback from the top of the bluff is forty feet. 5.) These bluffs are considered unstable and are subject to catatrophic slides. The potential for an earthquake of a high magnitude occuring in western Washington in the near future is considered a high probability by regional experts. 6.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion,and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 7.) This waiver also includes findings and conditions for evaluation of shoreline areas as regulated under the provision of The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, adopted March 7, 1988, as amended. 8.) The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be 30 feet, or 1 foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank height exceeds 10 feet. 9.) The required setback for a structure/residence on this parcel shall be forty feet from the top of the shoreline bluff. 10.) A vegetive buffer of 30 feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the shoreline bluff. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the landslide hazard area. 11.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated geologically hazardous area, or its associated buffer. 12.) Damage to vegetation to be retained on site shall be minimized by directional felling of trees away from these areas. 13.) Landslide hazard areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration shall be made to the landslide hazard area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area Administrator. 14.) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a marine bluff, landslide hazard or ravine. If drainage must be discharged from a bluff to adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the face of the bluff and discharged to the water by tight line drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the shoreline. A shoreline permit is required to discharge water at the shoreline. 15.) A setback(buffer) of 15 feet, measured perpendicularly from the ordinary high water mark along the banks of streams located on the property shall be permanently maintained as a fish and wildlife habitat area. 16.) Fish and wildlife habitat area buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required by the Critical Area Administrator. No alteration shall be made to the fish and wildlife habitat area buffer without prior authorization by the Critical Area Administrator. 17.) All construction activities, including the storage and preparation of materials, shall not encroach upon the designated fish and wildlife habitat area, its associated buffer, or any critically important plants and trees identified on the subject property. Page I of 3 tr A.7GO ovate is - ----- - 18.) Damage to vegetation to be retaiig on site shall be minimized by directional 1110g of trees away from these areas. 19.) The proposed development shalliplocated on the subject property exactly antified on the Universal Plot Plan, or other Site Plan, approved by the County as part of the triggering permit application. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting and notifying contractor(s) of the above conditions in order to ensure compliance at various stages of construction/development. 20.) Residential structures shall not exceed thirty-five(35) feet in height. SEP95-00383 ADACHI F Application Received: 12/28/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/23/1996 Case Finaled: 6/6/1996 NOW FILED W/SEP98-00255 1.) 100 ft. setback to surface water and all wells to be maintained 2.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or meclopiodisrbnce. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. L Li !! Livj 3.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 4.) Divert all sources of drainage away from septic tank and drainfield area. — 5.) Any ortion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 6.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 7.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of a building permit on this site. 8.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 9.) 50 ft. setback to surface water from tanks to be maintained SEP98-00255 ADACHI F Application Received: 12/21/1998 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/18/1999 Case Finaled: 12/10/1999 SEP95-383 NOW FILED HERE 1.) This site has been granted a waiver from the state onsite sewage regulation 246-272-09501, 50 ft setback required from well to effluent transport line. A waiver to 25' has been granted. Compliance with conditions of the waiver is required, double casing with specified pipe, pressure testing and monitoring by PUD for the life of the system on an annual basis. 2.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 3.) Setbacks to all wells- 100' required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50' required from tanks. 10' separation required between water lines and effluent transport lines. 4.) 50 ft. setback from surface waters to be maintained from tanks. 5.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. 6.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 7.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 8.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 9.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the septic tank and pump chamber prior to covering. 10.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 11.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 12.) Compliance with the conditions of the signed Critical Area Waiver is required. 13.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the pump chamber. Risers to grade highly recommended over inlet and outlet of septic tank. 14.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection and pump test of the septic tank and pump chamber prior to covering. CSP11-00004 MLA10-00155 ADACHI TRUSTEE 1 P Application Received: 1/31/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: CASP FOR SLOPE STON to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. No findings,conditions,or permissions found. PRJ11-00015 MLA10-00155 ADACHI TRUSTEE P Application Received: 1/31/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. No findings, conditions,or permissions found. SDP10-00051 MLA10-00155 ADACHI TRUSTEE III P Application Received: 4/21/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SLOPE STABILIZATION to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope. No findings, conditions,or permissions found. Page 2 of 3 PRE09-00034 ADACHI TRUSTEE M Application Received: 12/2/2009 Fit Issued/Case closed: 12/15/2009 a Finaled: Slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slo . No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD00-00047 ADACHI F Application Received: 1/19/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/20/2000 Case Finaled: 2/24/2000 PROPANE TANK INS'ALLA I ION No findings,conditions,or permissions found. SOM98-00255 ADACHI TRUSTEE F Application Received: 12/10/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions,or permissions found. LOG 1 E M Pkd 3, ,,. ? S Page 3 of 3 • • LOG ITEM Landslide Remediation Adachi Property Critical Area Stewardship Plan January 13, 2011 1 For: Derek Adachi JAN 3 1 2011 19223 34th Ave. South Seatac,WA 98188 JEFFERSON LDDM DER Prepared by: Marine Surveys Et Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360)385-4073, Fax: (360)385-2188 Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Lou' ITEM • Table of Contents o 1.0. Site Location and Project Summary 4 1.1 Existing Consitions 4 1.2. Proposed Project 4 2.0. CASP Mitigation Proposal 5 2.1. Description of the Critical Area Buffer 5 2.2. Species of Interest within the Critical Area 5-9 2.3. Project Impacts 9 2.4. Goals and Objectives 9 3.0. Proposal Implementation 9 3.1.Planting Plan 9-10 3.2. Grading 10 3.3. Stormwater Plan 10 3.4. Performance Plan 11 4.0. Post-Implementation Management 11 4.1. Monitoring 11 4.2. Maintenance 12 4.3. Contingency Plan 12 References 12-14 Figures 1. Project Location 15 2.Site Plan 16 3. MRE Wall Section 17 4. Reinforced Earth Buttress 18 5. Cross Section A-A 19 6. Cross Section B-B 20 7. Planting Plan 21 MS&A Landslide Remediation-Cjitical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 2 • Photographs.18) • 22-27 Jefferson County Environmentally Sensitive Areas 19. Contours and DNR Streams 28 20. Seismic Hazard 29 21. Landslide Hazard 30 22. Critical Aquifer Recharge Sties 31 23. Shoreline Slope Stability 32 Aspect Consulting Geotechnical Investigation Report Addendum... 33-35 LOG ITEM Page 3 of r.g MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 3 • Landslide Remediation • • Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Adachi Property LOG ITEM Page i 1.0. SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT SUMMARY 1.1. Existing Conditions The Adachi site is located at 1253 Deer Creek Road in T26N,RO 1 W,NW 1/4 of Sec 3,on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula overlooking Dabob Bay(Figure 1). This report was prepared following the guidelines for buffer reduction under the Critical Area Stewardship Program(CASP)to describe the conditions within the buffer and why it is necessary to reduce the buffer. The property is approximately 7 acres in size and slopes to the west from Deer Creek Road to the Dabob Bay shoreline. The overall average slope for the parcel is approximately 40%with the steepest portion being located along the bluff below the existing house. The top of the bluff is approximately 60' above the shoreline and the slope is approximately 80%. The property and surrounding areas have been logged in the last 40 years. There are scattered second growth conifers,Pseudotsuga menziesii(Douglas fir)and Thuja plicata(Western red cedar),as well as sizeable deciduous species,Acer macrophyllum(Big leaf maple)and Alnus rubra(Red alder). • The fish and wildlife habitat area is entirely associated with the shoreline. This property is part of a critical aquifer recharge area as shown on the County map layers(Figure 31). There is a small stream on property which flows from the Northeast(Figure 28). It is not recorded as a DNR stream or an LFA-Fish on the County map layers. There is no evidence of flooding.Additional critical areas at and adjacent to the project site are noted in Figures 28-32. The property includes a single house,a detached garage,and a pump house,all within the buffer area (Figure 2). The house represents a second residence for the family and they occupy it for an average of one or two weekends per month,possibly more in the summer time. The garage is used to house a boat and trailer in the winter(and generally not for parked cars). The pump house consists of a pressure tank and serves the water requirements for the house; insulation protects the contents of the pump house from freezing and the water generally does not need to be turned off in the winter.This area was originally clear cut 30-40 years ago and the present plant composition consists of approximately 10%non-native landscaping. 1.2. Proposed Project The proposed project involves slope remediation within the buffer. A landslide occurred in the winter of 2007/08 close to the existing residence and driveway(Figure 2). The slide area is entirely within the buffer. As a result,this portion of the buffer contains additional plant species which settled in the disturbed area including some non-natives,blackberries(Rubus sp.)and Senecio jacobaea (Tansy ragwort). The work proposed is the stabilization of the slope(Figures 2-6). One or two deciduous trees will be removed as well as many of the shrub and herbaceous species that have reseeded. The bottom portion of slide area will be planted in layers within the reinforcement wall and will consist of smaller shrub species that will not grow so large as to compromise the stability of the slope under adverse conditions. This area will not be monitored due to unstable slope conditions. A temporary access road will lead to the remediation area. The road will be re-graded to blend with the upper slope. The entire slope between the slide scarp and the outer reaches of the access road will be re-planted with native species(Figure 7). The upper most portion where soils are more stable will include conifer species. Moving down slope towards MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 4 reinforcement,p lants will ted to smaller deciduous tree and shrub dillies. The intent is to restore the buffer to its pre-slide con tion with plants that will eventually provil the functions of the riparian buffer. LOG ITEM i# 2.0. CASP MITIGATION � .. 2.1. Description of the Critical Area Buffer The single-family residence and non-native landscaping surrounding it occupy a portion of the 150' buffer along the property's shoreline. The portion of the buffer that has not been developed or affected by the landslide is a remnant second growth stand with canopy consisting mainly of Pseudotsuga menziesii, Thuja plicata,Acer macrophyllum and Alnus rubra. The shrub layer includes:Rubus spectabilis (Salmonberry),Rubus parviflorus(Thimbleberry), Vaccinium ovatum(Evergreen huckleberry), Holodiscus discolor(oceanspray),and Sambucus racemosa(Red elderberry). Primary ground cover is Polystichum munitum(Sword fern)and Gaultheria shallop(Salal). This buffer provides soil stability, sediment control,wildlife habitat,shade and nutrient inputs. 2.2. Species of interest within the Critical Area The Adachi property is located in Dabob Bay,which is considered a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area(FWHCA)because there are many species that are listed under the Endangered Species Act that are,or could be,present in the waters adjacent to the project site. In the project area,there are two salmon species,Hood Canal summer-run chum(Oncorhynchus keta)and Puget Sound chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha),listed under the Endangered Species Act as threatened species according to the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)(Federal Register,Vol.64, Nos. 56 and 57).On May 11,2007.NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead(Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a threatened species under the ESA(Federal Register/Vol. 72,No.91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations).Bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus)were listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)in October of 1999. On April 27,2010,NOAA listed the distinct population segments(DPSs)of yelloweye and canary rockfish as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act(ESA)and listed the Georgia Basin DPS of bocaccio as endangered(Federal Register/Vol.75,No. 81,April 28,2010,Final Rule).The Georgia Basin refers to all of Puget Sound,including the area around the San Juan Islands,and the Strait of Georgia north to the mouth of the Campbell River in British Columbia.The western boundary of the Georgia Basin runs from east of Port Angeles to Victoria in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. On September 2,2005,NMFS issued the final rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant Units(ESUs)of West Coast salmon,including the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU and the Hood Canal Summer-run Chum ESU.The project site is in the designated area for the Puget Sound Chinook and Hood Canal Summer-run ESUs(Federal Register,Vol 70,No.170,Friday, September 2, 2005 Rules and Regulations). On November 15,2005 NMFS listed the Southern Resident killer whale(Orcinus orca)as endangered under ESA(Federal Register,Vol.70,No.222,November 18,2005/Rules and Regulations).NOAA Fisheries has designated critical habitat for killer whales(Federal Register/Vol. 71,No.229/November 29,2006/Final Rule). "Critical habitat includes waters deeper than 20'relative to a contiguous shoreline delimited by the line of extreme high water."There have been no confirmed sightings of Southern Resident killer whales in Hood Canal or the Dabob Bay area.The project site is not located in an area designated as critical habitat for the Southern Resident killer whales. The project site is on a shoreline designated as critical habitat for Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout(Federal Register,Vol. 70,No. 185/September 26,2005/Rules and Regulations). MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 5 NMFS also listed the Steller sewn(Eumetopias jubatus)as threatened an the humpbac�C�e'T (Megaptera novaeangliae)and Pacific leatherback turtle(Dermochelys c acea)as endan I,�e species that may occur in Puget Sound. p# j Marbled murrelets(Brachyramphus marmoratus)have also been listed as threatened by thagtws ince C1 O'S 1992.There is no murrelet critical habitat near the project site.(Federal Register,Vol.61,No. 102, 1996). There is no designated critical habitat for Steller sea lions or leatherback sea turtles in Washington and no designated critical habitat for humpback whales at this time. Puget Sound Chinook:Puget Sound chinook,also called the king salmon,are distinguished from all other Pacific salmon by their large size.Most chinook in the Puget Sound are"ocean-type"and migrate to the marine environment during their first year(Myers et al. 1998).They may enter estuaries immediately after emergence as fry from March to May at a length of 40 mm.,or they may enter the estuaries as fingerling smolts during May and June of their first year at a length of 60-80 mm.(Healey 1982).Chinook fry in Washington estuaries feed on emergent insects and epibenthic crustaceans(gammarid amphipods,mysids,and cumaceans).As they grow and move into neritic habitats,they feed on decapod larvae,larval and juvenile fish,drift insects,and euphausiids (Simenstad et al. 1982).These ocean-type chinook use estuaries as rearing areas and are the most dependent of all salmon species on estuaries for survival. According to the Washington State Conservation Commission(2002): Chinook salmon in Hood Canal are managed as a single stock of mixed origin with composite production(WDFW and WWTribes 1994).They are the summer/fall variety and typically spawn mid-September to late October.They are listed with Puget Sound chinook as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Chinook salmon,also known as king salmon,are not found in WRIA 17 in abundant numbers as spawners and,when found,are either the result of hatchery production or straying.The US Fish and Wildlife Service hatchery on the Big Quilcene River has been in existence since 1911.In 1980,they began a spring chinook program that continued until 1994.That run has not sustained itself over time,as recent spawner surveys indicate no adult returns to the river.Old records maintained by hatchery personnel document sporadic numbers of naturally spawning chinook, probably fall chinook due to the low summer flows,but again,those have not sustained a natural population(Larry Telles,personal communication,March 2002). A small local volunteer chinook rearing project on Tarboo Creek released 100,000 fry/smolts (100/Ib)from George Adams stock at river mile 2.5 in 1994, 1995 and 1996. Small numbers of returning adults and/or their associated redds have been observed in the lower river since 1997. Time will tell if the run is sustainable. As an update on the Tarboo Creek program,Thom Johnson from WDFW(pers.comm.,May 8,2009) reported that there is no self-sustaining chinook population in Tarboo Creek. Hood Canal Summer-run Chum: Chum salmon have the widest natural geographic and spawning distribution of any Pacific salmon(Groot and Margolis 1991),and historically may have been the most abundant of all the salmon species(Neave 1961).In the Puget Sound area the spawning grounds are situated near coastal rivers and lowland streams.Summer,fall and winter runs are present.Fall- run chum are most prevalent,but summer runs are found in the Hood Canal,the Strait of Juan de Fuca and in southern Puget Sound(WDFW 1994).In the Hood Canal,the summer-run stocks spawn from early-September to mid-October,while spawning of the fall-run stocks begins about the third week in October and may continue into January(WDFW 1994). Juvenile chum in Washington begin migration downstream in late January and continue through May, although there is considerable variability in the onset of migration due to the large number of cues MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 6 influencing migration( enstad et al. 1982 and Salo 1991).Them ion to the estuarine environment usually happens immediately after emergence(Simensta 1998),but juveniles have been reported to remain in freshwater streams for up to a month(Salo and Noble 1953 and Bostick 1955). Chum and ocean-type chinook spend more time in the estuarine environment than other species of salmon(Dorcey et al. 1978 and Healey 1982).Residence time in the Hood Canal ranges from 4 to 32 days with an average residence of 24 days(Simenstad 1998).Juvenile chum consume benthic organisms found in and around eelgrass beds(harpacticoid copepods,gammarid amphipods and isopods),but change their diet to drift insects and plankton such as calanoid copepods,larvaceans, and hyperiid amphipods as their size increases to 50-60 mm.(Simenstad et al. 1982).Eelgr&)3s ITEM are probably the main migration corridors for juveniles,providing both forage opportunes and refuge from predation(Simenstad et al. 1982). of Simenstad and Salo(1982)found that as the food resources started to decrease in mid ttoo late siiiiner, 3g juvenile chum tended to move offshore,suggesting a relationship between out migration and prey availability. Summer chum escapements in Hood Canal have generally experienced a continuous decline for the past 30 years.However,beginning in 2003,escapements began to increase.In 2004,the escapements were the highest recorded during the period that total spawner numbers have been estimated(1974- 2004)(WDFW and Point No Point Treaty Council 2005). In the project area vicinity,Hood Canal summer run chum are found in the Big Quilcene River Subbasin and the Little Quilcene Subbasin. Bull Trout:Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout have ranged geographically from northern California(at present they are extinct in California)to the Bering Sea coast of Alaska,and northwest along the Pacific Rim to northern Japan and Korea.Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family. Spawning occurs typically from August to November in streams and migration to the open sea (for anadromous populations)takes place in the spring.Eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival.Temperatures in excess of about 15 degrees C are thought to limit bull trout distribution(Rieman and McIntyre 1993).They live both in fresh and marine waters. Some migrate to larger rivers(fluvial),lakes(adfluvial),or saltwater(anadromous)before returning to smaller streams to spawn.Others(resident bull trout)complete all of their life in the streams where they were reared. Habitat degradation,dams and diversions,and predation by non-native fish threaten the Coastal-Puget Sound po ulation.The Coastal-Pu g et Sound bull trout population is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the contiguous United States(Federal Register,Vol. 64,No.210, 1999). There are three bull trout subpopulations in the Skokomish River Basin which enters into Hood Canal south of the site.There is an isolated population in Lake Cushman(due to the construction of a dam on the North Fork Skokomish River),a second subpopulation occurs in the South Fork-lower North Fork Skokomish River,and a third subpopulation occurs in the upper North Fork Skokomish River above Staircase Falls(Staircase Falls is assumed to be a barrier to migration of the Lake Cushman stock into the upper North Fork Skokomish).The first two populations are considered"depressed" (with fewer than 500 spawners in each population),and the third population is considered"unknown" because of insufficient information(Federal Register,Vol.64,No.210, 1999). Puget Sound Steelhead: Populations of Puget Sound steelhead in the Hood Canal generally average less than 100 spawners per year(Federal Register/Vol.72,No. 91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations). According to the Washington State Conservation Commission(2002), "The populations of winter steelhead from all the streams entering Quilcene Bay and Dabob Bay are combined into one stock. They spawn between mid-February and the beginning June(WDFW and WWTribes 1994). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has been monitoring winter steelhead in the Little MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 7 Quilcene River since 1999�escapement goal has not been set.The stip is Unknown botiQ G ITEM SASSI and SaSI." Marbled Murrelets:Marbled murrelets are small marine birds in the alcidae family.TheyPs their time at sea and only use old growth areas for nesting. In the critical nesting areas,fragmentation and loss of old growth forest has a significant impact on the survival and conservation of the species (WDW 1993).Adult birds are found within or adjacent to the marine environment where they dive for sand lance,sea perch,Pacific herring,surf smelt,other small schooling fish and invertebrates.There is no critical habitat within close range of the project and there are no nests close to the project site. Forage Fish: Migrating salmon utilize baitfish such as Pacific herring(Clupea harengus pallasi),sand lance(Ammodytes hexapterus)and surf smelt(Hypomesus pretiosus)as prey resources.These forage fish form a very important trophic link between plankton resources and a wide variety of predatory marine organisms as well as providing food for marbled murrelets,bald eagles and salmon. According to(WDFW SalmonScape),there are no"documented" surf smelt or sand lance spawning beaches near the site. There are Pacific herring spawning areas along the eastern shoreline of the Bolton Peninsula across Dabob Bay from the site.However,there are no Pacific herring areas on the shoreline adjacent to the project site(WDFW 2008). Steller Sea Lions: Steller sea lions are found on the west coast from California to Alaska.Breeding colonies do not exist on the Washington coast but may be found in British Columbia and Oregon (Osborne et al. 1988).There are no documented haulouts or rookeries in the project area(Jeffries et al.2000),although sea lions are seen in the Puget Sound in the winter(October-May)where their visits are transitory. Humpback Whales:Due to excessive whaling practices in the past,humpback whales are rarely seen in Puget Sound,even though in the past they were much more prevalent(Angell and Balcomb 1982). According to Osborne et al.(1988),there were only three sightings of humpback whales in Puget Sound from 1976 to 1988.However,recently,a juvenile humpback whale was sighted near Johnson Point(NE of Olympia),with several fresh injuries(Orca Network Sighting Report-July 10,2006). Another recent sighting was made near the San Juan Islands on August 31,2006(Orca Network Sighting Report-September 03,2006).However,it is highly unlikely they would be present in the project area(Jeffries,pers.comm.). Leatherback Sea Turtle:There is no breeding habitat for these sea turtles in Washington,even though they are occasionally seen along the coast(Bowlby et al. 1994).They are rarely seen in Puget Sound (McAllister,pers.comm.).Again,it seems highly unlikely that these turtles would be found near the project site. Southern Resident Killer Whales:The Southern Resident population consists of three pods: J,K and L. According to Wiles(2004),"While in inland waters during warmer months,all of the pods concentrate their activity in Haro Strait,Boundary Passage,the Southern Gulf Islands,the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and several localities in the southern Georgia Strait."During early autumn,these pods,especially J pod,extend their movements into Puget Sound to take advantage of the chum and chinook salmon runs.Resident killer whales spend more time in deeper water and only occasionally enter water less than 5 meters deep(Baird 2001). There have been no confirmed sightings of Southern Resident killer whales in Hood Canal.Therefore, it seems unlikely that the proposed project will have any impacts on this species. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 8 • Rockfish:Bocaccio rockfis found more often in South Puget Sound ereas yelloweye are more prevalent in North Puget ound.All three species of rockfish remain c ose to the surface as larvae and pelagic juveniles.As juveniles they settle to benthic environment.They prefer to settle in rocky reefs, kelp beds,low rock and cobble areas(Love et al.2002).Yelloweye juveniles are also found in sponge gardens.As the three species grow larger they move into deeper waters.Adults are found around rocky reefs and coarse habitats.Yelloweye rockfish are commonly found at depths from 300'to 590'. Canary rockfish usually habitat the area between 160'to 820'and bocaccio rockfish are usually found between 160'and 820'(Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 81 /Wednesday,April 28,2010/Rules and Regulations.).All three species are opportunistic feeders,with their prey dependent on their life sta e. Predators of the adults of these species include marine mammals,salmon,other rockfish,l' EM sharks. 2.3. Project Impacts Page ___ f The primary intended effects of this proposed project are restoration of the buffer in the area affected by the 2008 slide,and therefore improved function and value of the critical area as a whole. Although the slide and proposed slope stabilization both occur within the critical area's buffer,they are above the Ordinary High Water Mark(OWHM). The proposed project aims ultimately toward increased ground cover with native plants along the slope above the shore,reinforced earth that will be less likely to slide down into the intertidal,and increased natural shade and sources of organic material for nearshore habitats and organisms. Effects will also be observed in the portion of the buffer which must be disrupted by the access road required for the construction of slope stabilization;this area will be re-planted with native species,and subsequently monitored and maintained to prevent colonization by invasive or harmful plants. 2.4. Goals and Objectives The goal of the proposed plan is to safeguard the existing buffer through stabilization and re-planting,and to extend it beyond pre-slide conditions thus protecting the critical area. Through earth reinforcement,the slope that acts as a buffer will effectively be extended. The proposed planting plan and subsequent maintenance protocol will act to increase the ratio of native to invasive plants,as well as ultimately benefiting the critical area through improved function of the buffer zone. 3.0. PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION 3.1. Planting Plan (Figure 7) The plants selected for this site are all native to the area and most are found already growing on the property. They were selected to improve the overall value of the functions in this riparian area. Soil stability,sediment control,nutrient input and wildlife habitat were all important factors. This area is part of a bald eagle management area so many larger tree species(particularly P. menziesii)are included in the upper slope to provide for eagle habitat needs. The proposed access road will be re-graded and planted densely with a mix of trees and shrubs. Areas to the east and west of access road will be planted with trees to supplement what is already growing there. These areas contain natives that will continue to grow and repopulate this portion of the buffer where mitigation is to take place(Figure 7). Following is a table showing the species,numbers and spacing for the entire planting area. Plants will be selected from a regional native plant nursery. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 9 PLANT LIST Quantity Common Name Botanical Name Size Spacing 1 Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum 2 gal 10' on center 13 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 1 gal 10' on center LOG ITEM 8 Hooker Willow Salix hookeriana 1 gal 10' on center 8 Western red cedar Thujaplicata 1 gal 10' on center ---� 6 Evergreen huck. Vaccinium ovatum 1 gal random 17 Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis 1 gal 5' on center 33 Sword fern Polystichum munitum _ 4"pot 2-4' on center Plants should be installed in late fall or early spring following the construction work(October 15 to March 15). During these times plants are semi-dormant and soils are easier to work. Plants will be laid out by hand generally following the spacing specified on the planting plan. The as-built may be slightly different from what is shown on the plan in areas that will not be disturbed by machinery as these trees are meant to supplement the natives that are already present. Natives will not be removed to follow the plan exactly. The plants will be installed by digging a one to two foot hole,loosening the soil,placing plant in ground after loosening soil around root ball. The hole must be deep enough to ensure that roots are straight,but not so deep as to bury plants too far above the root collar. Once the plant is in place the hole will be backfilled and tamped lightly. Mulch should be applied 3"deep, 100%coverage on the access road,and at one foot diameter around individual trees in undisturbed area. Mulch will aid in slope stability, moisture and nutrient retention and weed control. No extraordinary measures are proposed at this time to protect the installed plants other than mulching, weeding and watering. Substitutions might be necessary for species or individuals that cannot be found at local nurseries;all plant substitutions will be approved by the project biologist prior to installation to ensure their suitability for the site. The project biologist will be present before planting to confirm correct species,quantity,health,and sizes of the plants being used. The biologist will assist in the placement of plants to ensure the plan is followed as closely as possible. 3.2. Grading The natural slope has developed into a steepened bluff due to the long-term east-west landslide feature just north of the Adachi residence. A"Mechanically Reinforced Earth"(MRE—Figure 3)slope buttress will prevent further sliding. The height of the natural slope in the area of the proposed buttress is between 25-50' high,and the grading is between 140%and 100%,respectively. A history of lesser landslide events is evident. The reinforced slope will begin at 60'high and grade down at a ratio of 1.3 Horizontal to 1 Vertical to the toe of the slope. (Data taken from the Geotech Report Addendum prepared by Aspect Consulting,March 5,2010,pp.33-35 of this report) 3.3. Stormwater Plan The parcel size is 6.98 acres,or 304,054 square feet. Out of this total,an area of 5225 square feet of compacted surface will be cleared or grades;including 2350 square feet of`driveway',375 square feet of rockery landscaping,and 2500 square feet of slope. This project will not result in the conversion of a significant amount of native vegetation to a landscaped sr pastured area. (Data taken from Jefferson County Stormwater Calculation Worksheet completed by Sealevel.) MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 10 3.4. Performance Stands • This is an unusual situation in which the buffer has already been altered by past logging activity and natural forces. The goal of this CASP is to improve slope stability and to restore wildlife habitat. Performance standards will include: A.Survival rate: It will not be possible to monitor the lower portion of this project in a traditional manner due to unstable conditions. Brush layering in reinforcement areas will occur. A 90%survival rate for installed plants and existing native plants will be the goal in the more gently sloped area above the bluff reinforcement. 90%survival will be expected in all monitoring years. B.Percent cover by native plants: Year one:at least 10-15%cover by installed and volunteer native plants. LOG ITEM Year two: at least 15-25%cover by installed and volunteer native plants. Year three:at least 25-35%cover by installed and volunteer native plants. Year four:at least 35-45%cover by installed and volunteer native plants. ` gc,; 43rn Year five: at least 45-55%cover by installed and volunteer native plants. C.Removal of non-native species in planted area. Less than 10%cover by non-native species including,but not limited to non-native Rubus species and Senecio jacobaea (both observed on site before re-grading). 4.0. POST-IMPLEMENTATION MANAGEMENT 4.1. Monitoring An as-built drawing and report will be submitted to Jefferson County Department of Community Development as documentation of the implementation of the approved planting plan within one month of installation. The plan will include fmal contours,vegetation description,and photo documentation from established photo stations. Monitoring will take place over a period of five years at the end of the growing season(late August or early September)of each monitoring year. The performance standards will be monitored by measuring plots in zones within the planting area that will be established and mapped after planting occurs,on the as-built plan. There will be photo points for each plot and they will be referenced on the as-built plan. Photos will be taken at all points for all three years as visual documentation of the performance standards progress,or lack of. Collected data and photos will be compiled into a report for Jefferson County DCD. The report will address whether the performance standards are being met during each monitoring year and if the fmal end of monitoring period standards are going to be met. Monitoring results will determine whether or not contingency measures will be needed. Performance Standard#1 (survival rate):Immediately after planting,all plants including planted and naturally established will be counted and documented. At the end of each growing season(late Aug- early Sept)plots will be visited and a count of surviving plants will be documented. The percent survival for the plots will be calculated by dividing the total number of plants after planting by the total number of surviving plants at the end of the season. Performance Standard#2(percent cover):The percent cover standard will be monitored by looking at each monitoring unit of the enhanced areas from above and estimating the area covered by the individual species. The percent cover within an area can be quantified as a total greater than 100% because plants(in tree,high/low shrub and herbaceous layers)overlap in cover. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 11 Performance Standard#3 (i10)val of non-native species): The cover 1110n-native species which • • include,but are not limited to,blackberry species and tansy should be mamtained at less than 10%. The non-native coverage will be determined through the same process as determining the coverage of native plants in plots. Maintenance should occur at least two times during the growing season,one of which should be conducted before plants go to seed. The maintenance method will be hand reerl'� s no herbicides. 4.2. Maintenance Page, Maintenance shall occur at least twice during the growing season to ensure the survival of all native species within the mitigation area,including volunteer natives. Watering by hand or sprinkler may be necessary during year number one until the plants are established. Water requirements will depend on the timing of planting with the seasons and weather conditions. Once plants are established,extra watering may not be necessary. Hand weeding will be necessary around all plants that are being monitored for survival and coverage. It is desired that native species should repopulate the area naturally,but should be considered weeds if the survival of plan plants are jeopardized,unless the species can potentially provide more value to the overall function of the buffer area in question. All non-native species shall be removed at least twice during the growing season by hand. 4.3. Contingency Plan If the 90% survival rate is not met by the end of any monitoring year,plants lost to mortality will be replaced to achieve the percentage cover performance standard described above. Prior to replacement,an appropriate assessment will be performed to determine if the survival was affected by species/site selection,animal damage,or some other factor. Subsequent contingency actions must be designed to respond directly to the stressor(s)which are increasing mortality of planted native species. If a particular species is shown not to endure site conditions then another,more appropriate species will be selected. If excessive damage is observed,protective measures will be introduced. Monitoring years may be added if significant re-planting becomes necessary. REFERENCES: Angell,T. and K.C.Balcomb III. 1982.Marine Birds and Mammals of Puget Sound.Puget Sound Books.University of Washington Press, Seattle,WA, 146 pp. Baird,R.W.2001. Status of killer whales, Orcinus orca,in Canada.Canadian Field-Naturalist 115:676- 701. Bostick,W.E. 1955.Duwamish River seining studies.In: Puget Sound stream studies,pp. 5-6. Wash. Dep.Fish.Olympia,WA. Bowlby,D.E.,G.A.Green and M.L.Bonnell. 1994.Observations of leatherback turtles offshore of Washington and Oregon.Northwestern Naturalist 75:33-35. Federal Register/Vol.61,No. 102/May 24, 1996/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 64,No. 56/March 24, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 64,No. 57/March 25, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.64,No. 210/November 1, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol 70,No.170/Friday, September 2,2005/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol 70,No.185/Monday, September 26,2005/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No.222/November 18,2005/Rules and Regulations. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 12 ' Federal Register/Vol. 71,1429/November 29,2006/Final Rule. • -�L ITEM Federal Register/Vol. 72,No. 91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.75,No. 81 /Wednesday,April 28,2010/Rules and Regulations. - Groot,C.and L.Margolis(eds.). 1991.Life history of Pacific salmon, UBC Press,Vancouver,British Columbia. Healey,M. C. 1982.Juvenile Pacific salmon in estuaries:the life support system,pp.315 -341.In:V.S. Kennedy(ed.),Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. Jeffries, Steven J.,Patrick J.Gearin,Harriet R.Huber,Don L. Saul and Darrell A.Pruett.2000.Atlas of Seal and Sea Lion Haulout Sites in Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Science Division,Olympia,WA, 150 pp. Love,M.S.,M.M.Yoklavich,and L.Thorsteinson.2002.The rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. University of California Press,Berkeley,California. Myers,J.M.,R.G.Kope,G.J.Bryant,D.Teel,L.J.Lierheimer,T.C.Wainwright,W. S.Grand,F.W. Waknitz,K.Neely, S.T.Lindley,and R. S.Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington,Idaho, Oregon,and California.U.S.Dept.of Commerce,NOAA Tech Memo.NMFS- NWFSC-35, 443 pp. Neave,F. 1961.Pacific salmon: ocean stocks and fishery developments.Pac. Sci. Congr. Proc. 1957(10): pp. 59-62. Osborne,R.W.2003. Southern resident killer whale sighting compilation 1990-2003.The Whale Museum,Friday Harbor,WA 98250. Rieman,B.E. and J.D.McIntyre. 1993.Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of Bull Trout. Gen. Tech. Rpt. U. S.Forest Service,Intermountain Research Station,Ogden,UT.38 pp. Salo,E.O.and R.E.Noble. 1953.Chum salmon upstream migration.Minter Creek Biological Station Prog. Rep. (Sept. -Oct. 1953).Wash.Dept.Fish.,Olympia,WA. Simenstad,C.A.and E.O. Salo. 1982.Foraging success as a determinant of estuarine and nearshore carrying capacity of juvenile chum salmon(Oncorhynchus keta)in Hood Canal,Washington,pp.21- 371.In:B.R.Melteff and R.A.Veve(eds.),Proceedings of the North Pacific Aquaculture Symposium,Alaska Sea Grant Rpt. 82-2. Simenstad,C.A.,K.L.Fresh and E.O. Salo. 1982.The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function,pp.343-364.In V.S. Kennedy(ed.).Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. Simenstad, Charles A.,Coordinator. 1998.Estuarine landscape impacts on Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca summer chum salmon and recommended actions.University of Washington, Seattle,WA. Washington Department of Wildlife(WDW). 1993.Status of the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus in Washington.Unpubl.Rep.Wash.Dept.Wildl.,Olympia, WA. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW). 1994. 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory,Appendix One,Puget Sound Stocks,Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca Volume,Olympia, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW).2008. State herring stock status report.Kurt Stick and Adam Lindquist.WDFW Fish Management Division. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 13 Washington Department of Fi d Wildlife(WDFW)and Point No Point Sty Council(PNPTC). • • February 10,2005.Memoran urn report:2004 Progress report on Hood anal summer chum salmon. 15 p. Washington State Conservation Commission. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors.Water Resources Inventory Area 17,Quilcene/Snow Watershed(2002). Wiles,G.J.2004.Washington State status report for the killer whale.Washington Department Fish and Wildlife,Olympia. 106 pp. LOG ITE` a Page of 1 MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 14 LOG ITEM Figure 1. Project location _ • / a �11 a"l a�t' �,><'wt,>•'?1^.�-� affi.N e'e xv°r.R q 2 l 1ju'R�a t Y rt ';..N-:,;-)----! t 1 e r t N . ' ✓ 4 r.,/.. � , i %. 1,A �3 .:1 I , 3 7 3 j? 52 ` ' t' L t 'ya�, X-k•l µ i�V � 1 f 1 y 1 i *-41i-if,;04,-;-, ., Y 4 l ; i, 41:x @ s 7 , y � S3"h // F , 8 '' r ,i ; F xt '` t4 4 �' aye {" i c ff s^ ,# 'it 4 v U 1�1 r s 3- j ('e- vt ? 3 � �ti irl� ,'� � t ,, a F ` jk '", " / �: ;., - d s� ,r e -' t" 1 ?r ! we tt t y 4ik,,, a• ,s t $ 4 `'T � ! 7 4 , r z 8 X 4 „s, y " ''f , :� t° - -▪ i�gg � 2 ? ) ' ' vY {' f i, ti�,k --:- -:.. ` ,. t'r� t j a t. A t l a' ,3„r ! i ` r 4 x , n �1 r- t o ' � r 3 a #, - r' F 2 � 4,"",:',!"..-",.'4',/,',":":":' :Z. r r ,' -, .{/— . 1 s r r f i 'p _� le - �5 0 -c r' 7 xtC � ' '1 a r ': , r''t , ' 1 i ir f.,-, ? / : tx 44 ,, y; x ✓7C't�a 4 j1.i e � 1� ga l \1 (j � i ; . � ^r 4-1---,-,- -7 �' . P�{ s 1ta , a r 4 e� Y�� 4 -,� >j l ## �C s\.,1-?N''''' . ,E ' J ' t�,r e ( ,� + a -�' t, r. � , ! x.*6 4. , �`i > 1 l ict` ms. -t 1i"10 a O ..0,'Z'::4:: c 1 tY. v $ '''/71:77:4? ..'' a;'- i S a e a $ S r .� ?' e`: - ,-,, r .r r ` .- ,` .• .��Y �t s , '�. . !"- 1 }j''-i.2 ? � I f 's� :, xa` r i j 1 t+∎ t f_.- - �., ri �.. # {� �. ��9 t � ::-.1. re-. 1 ("" ' 1� 'r..# a vgr # � a 1 !� "'� e,, % n )i ta g t r>7 J �„ . � el � 3F x r a xSel ,s �4 3 •r f,_ybr s F F C I� w t r,st.ti 0 � ,v - 2 ts Iv it. > ' r � _e Arta ( '(lei7 4' ± , ' j `�,. ..fi /' _ ct z T . -/.; '"T . e r __ ..t i S ° ° l A ., . . T A L ' '+t kyx 3t a than, i,4 f ",ii.,, .\ ` l :--"^,- ,J: � ,t Pr g 3 F + a vt 'f }9 !fir i. 1tP t J t j 'sAL\_ � ' \o'1 / - Ct ' , t f `L k �Sj x'l r - i /¢ t f� � ('-‘ r i (,,, ): x . /or'4 �� o �a ` 1 � 'f{ f1}TJ (+kr -��S:1 //r.Hrt�x �i , "{ ji .i fjj t . [ / s r-a r r ✓ t r ` �e 1 � 110 , ,° ' . ;s r . t ea�n t `d &r . ',. r.f t� i l8 L r / 0 t j ;,;;11.- vF \\\ ! / .ii! i r „ t i 4 j M1 x� , �j;if . yt . r� 1 �* I W; 3 l f v YI \ J} 1 V+ Zr �� . t• ti T 'a F vo knn �j f✓ "4 F � i V n\ n . in„. e n'o boom .topo.i.(wwwcom)m Pmdctwer from TOPO!®1999 Wiifb hinted TNVM^N MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Ada chi Property• 15 • Figure 2. Site Plan • LOG ITE • # 1/ Page _of____ * b .4---\_.‘ \ *4\)x El 1 i I ' I \ � \ i dtI do ` ! El 011 '/ ::: t.\\ / Li zi 1 4 / iii /moo IN I...`\i \ �., / I / O tom. ` �� � z-- g Y •u o \ I : �- o --. \ I and _ Wi { 2 / W 111 (n—) '''' /11;'‘ ' 'I its r( • . \ on N6 1 •'A gg ..,/, s-."1 - 8 43 gfa�� i . '' r Co t ti y'e`a°':"„C•,`,w 4`S°``,.e: ® • 1 i 4,i i ( '- - •,,;?::::°.00zWi;>":--.4,;,...i.,;iiv: 1 -%•0f�ee�`+tom`2°`'%040010`0°2,':a;' • 066.06646°.0''..: �0°Oria•`0i••°'r1 p m pW A..•N 46 C O•q•°0p°6®N 6 6.t6 4046°0\'`®6i. W +o Y6 p� 66°L6 '�6 66 6 m 4 s`606\,�N.,.®`100.4`6a®t6O,0660`®�®� � �-.66s 4®66-e-• 6 66 6 00• 616 Ni®60°'6 4O6®e.6,0.0.41'0®6SL>°°6ale 9 O lo ./(‘I $ �e:6a6 e.+'e6,°!V�646o4tV66a6s�6°°I \fl'6;t6°0i \I n ^N it St‘-' ,,,, °;,..,, i 4, igrop).10P--....:t.;:.%,>°-___..--7756,,,,44. ...z.;W�f•� WNW K' J C ti . ` m Z Z. —1s as = as 6i r t e yJ�a i '/ z`• o�y. ° i 4•el v -° l .Aron 0� - 'V s Q MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 16 • Figure 3. MRE Wall Section • LOG ITEM Pa e of 1E It El! 15/-4 81(7?Q Z \- Ill it s''s 0 till .1 -- -J E! 'rig Ilif / s 0 �th p j � 90 ° ' z.m ` � �\ c E_ iji- 1 h it" ,:e ut in, .c,D., -.1 Q'.11 a`; x 8 iz is ° f m. g k ED f i f 8 -.I •g ° 1/ z c 1 g Z E W 0 �E E 2 6 b y c lit ma m a °'Y 3 " 22 W cn ..� .0 1),..c L, g 4 3ai oe c o` g .mc 8 �6 t x W msm 8W8w € aI =•3 c °° m V= E a r € 0 3ia ° w6 Zvi _, 088 0 �m- � cn22 t°) Wmo.m Q- u.. com MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 17 figure 4. Reinforced Earth Buttress • LOG ITEM #.______a_ Page of S till 4 •ar �% °Ai Si Tom I1 HH 1 !a "` 1 I W • 1 CIC �•• I tq a I\IV m E ( *- 8 tag I _ - 1 I mF.:, v. 2 ...- ‘ c-73 , , Ji Q E E• W X55 a E v n. ii E 1 Z 8 co ier tss MI 1101 w �4 J o �i CO v Eg - E MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 18 • Figure 5. Cross Section A-A • LOG I E 1' ge 9_ Pa 1 1 A f ! I i ! j 1 1 I 1 i ! t !Note: 1 � ( i 1 1 m -SlOpeamlor` +e-siope 4:1 I :--- ' ,'/4-------,---/;/ l use 2-3 maniset rock rtdcinum. j For lower 5'where<1:1,use Rock slope armor �� 11-2 man set rock ! , 1 ! ICE i i I i i 1 i - 9 f mow' / � - I 13 , :ty 8 1 � I �iRRE :� � il compacted au ,40 � A FSI:;. / ! --:1P I� Existing Slope „,‘,..k.."- `' * r '• . y.,t� 1 I ' '' 'S l/_J 1 V 30 _ I ' -T c.� ill- 1 Grid 2.Y! '-.'�.weti 9'.�J.-tk:. .+i /l- ! ,. zi `� F / I 20 , . - II Remove Bose raterisi,4 I I: I Gmezezeir. Crushed •« Jidda! � { 10. C.10.17,54EArAw49'_411. 1 �r ! �1„W /i T/ 1 1 I , ,.: and III toe ,o' f o; ! I F'resu up f I 1 in-situ sal 1 CROSS SECTION A-A' MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 19 • Figure 6. Cross Section B-B 0 • • i_Or-", I 1 Kil .... ,.... • B I I I I ' , , Note: Bilsting grade iii I ! i I Slope ar where slopa>1:1 • I :-.....,, ..._ ,,, ,,....„.... 70 —i---- I 1- _usa.2,3 , - _rockinininsun___.— . For wer lo 5'where<1:1,use --r- , II, 1-2 man set rock Rock slope;armor I w4V.:::---_--.7. , I 1 , I , ,-,A,„, 8/ tole4-1 ft_ 6evation t 60'1 P 1 I I 1 :::•%,X ,,E: /r !/ : I I ''''•-‘:'''...4i•-+:.c.Y. H L.Z.-- I i 1 1 I 1 ■ %3 _____ 50 t— —compactecill-- 1 ! ,dgq.:,i.vrt...,--:' ,.,/-•-• ! i . I I 1 _.:tannariPr iii- -/ I ..-,41ft1141/ger 1:---ir Edsiing slope , II , .14-,-- •:- - ..,., ..___------iii- i . .::-...-?,;...,:.4..&P-- .7 /,- i r I I 1 rid at 2.0' i ,-,-,kr 72i,i:-t,1-,A .- //L..-- , I 40 I I Excavation elevation i !varies,see site plan I &•,..--.-,,,:"..,i0.2--. ..:.,....e..-1;,,sitI19, r II ) I Orki @I 1.5' EIN"IraW2'14 Note: Excavate and ii I I ; MiliNiKtiti.41.13727,i I , Eiii,5',,..-if"Alg_r-,-f.itiSir /.=-----ii- when ' "•-• height of I I 30-repair-as-reqpired ',,i0erierRiWitATEV7Stii----- i Wall Is ' .:-.-:J•:- than 10'. i 1 , iii..„ I spacing of grid shall be I I , i -Alee"Q,I.XiMeti--1.7401ER i-I-L-/: i reduced to 0.75' '1! -.....,' ,., .....-.' ..-,...,..., -)1...........7,,.....7:: :7,- - /,---4_.------- 12:.--__---- ; ,,....-_---4,,..!....,r___ , Remove debris dna; replaca with MRE I r. 1--L-471 i-._ I i -- tiebris i i 1 I Hz 1_,==-1//- 1 I • . i i r I I I I ■ i 101 I i •______ , 1 — I i , 1 I 10' i _t - -- .-- CROSS SECTION B-B' MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 20 Figure 7. Planting Plan • LOG ITEM IA 2 # C cal � _ li Z - ‘ iii z ,... _ . \ ,,,„ \ N 1 t l I �„ \r 1 h Ii � ��'.. -Y'+ , R...,, cn cc Z 12 I 145' \, -4 -- o ,..--- --' ,e a ,. i t ..t. , - 0, or - _.; w .. :,_ . 0 .. to , ir,Aft ... ay, ..^ Q c _ , # ,� QC u)W l >. > v A 7} L °� OJW �N C 1,2 0 <C . _ZIob # V tii co < Z • 4 Z / dv v01-c, € E OF— 0 a ' I ck / L• 2 o} r m :Aiv4-01.1(:)0 ID �# g_ 3 o ., n n W Z ' r- • -\\ , „A 2 J wi t _ Wa q. N— D iy Air'-- ® • i 4 t b a $ M +- d 40 ,.` 4 }��� ' U C-AN 1l� r� L. *AA C V 4F U d ./ `;It*Vab 7;4 '� .r Z o 8 C C C• b$i icy' ' } **4' *®4,',3).;+.44►4'+sn, t!'T..14 aa4NO...., 4;`44�` � ; p qila, r , • +N f,4- °+4+ • #Itch 'y o _ = _ ' 44 �. °':"-4444`V44; ,4444, 44,$.444,'S+,It:4-• 0; C +°. 13 N 4 41444 L444 44+°'`x4 +-�44V x*.+Z`,4..'44.+", ' I h �i s .. .., � qi;b «li�,L,`4►M6`#+`���`rt��l�'es`itFiBS411.$4* 1a*,$,g t 1 O L j 0 X 0 xi '�+°4�'4'v'* ,4+►°44�►444 O�@"" si.d4 y d / c+'�`s®44+.®+►4•s,+�04 4►+,�R,404 44 s�44a4ro • v >. 01 +gs4+4i1 4)7"'4!«4x!°"`'` 44,..4-'":4 ..�44y,`%0+4,a E L i s o al 0 B IN 03 1 •+s a .! - MS&A Landslide Remediation—Critical Areas Stewardship Plan—Adachi Property • 21 Photographs • , . r,c of 3 r r� s if i if ki% :::7. i t, 1. TM CC 7. Looking west at the Adachi residence �4 kt„ � f�r.� jp� {1.5. d.flee ' ''; ''' r---'4,-`.-- '1,.,.?:t-'-',.::::7-7:14.. .'.1"'...*:e.';'fFw0.. .1'',..!.-; . -', ,;.j..,',.?--...1 • . -,.. .- .i � .4•'..,r t Yf \x. 3- v [f t j 8. Upper area northeast of the access road where Douglas firs will be planted,looking from Landslide Reme propane tank MS&A diation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 22 yk i N �+ M T� ga?j p , s 4 i jy` • ,•-lik. •-.3 1. '°P �i '...I.,'rev .. rat r n -it �� 9.Middle portion of access road area,looking north. �F u � "Y '4'i lit, r i 'Tart a i,;kr'r. F r- • J; .II• • .r^�r ,h" . . i 10. Lower portion of slide scarp area,looking south. Propane tank above tarp. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewards hi Plan-Adachi Pro e • 23 P Prop fi 1 1r 1 >r : ;slit N -. - 41 4, tict,. ;�I� iT M„, ,...41*t. c. I it !,,,,tti 1 t, '�;1;e',-,t-':♦4 r+° '` ` '17 7� Jr, 1@'R!' '� is 11 ! t t + tltl ' 4�- esi . ?R rYr ifej fir S F ,erg tz: y r :{ r t. ,_/ I - , ! efs ''` f a "" r' tVinfo/ cement)area.(re rt RCS .'•&I 3r,.. 11. Looking dow from slide area to constr'x uc t i , R '` �/ .`d°'' s ds `ynC >t y S,Ar "` 'M 9 : a . '� amfi P s 'f,[ ar- f t . r e a,t!+�+ ,i -tip /i t b itir^ "ue ' � ; 4 =,t. ifr. rah � # 'a y ,-APT' r r �l . +_ , � 1 - ,.,+' �+ .��"�� 'yr L f ti t ' ( d 1-t r ( � e .-mta: " c x +* m j , r2 y s, +s�' F i Y ♦ � - am—".X .p r YC l 'p lY�. y.,- , ! J, ,.-:/./; x n k - � I x , , 1 � y t. a - r _ ,. fly✓ •} V yf g. } I r _r T. z _ .. 52 . J . R I r 1C Ar.: -_ i 12.View to west showing lower reinforcement area. 24 MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• r /., �, :� � .' ��, �. ° ` LOG ITEM IS.'4,,,,e ,tea tti 'I. fi it Page g ;, 13. Looking east-water drainage in hill below slide scarp. .1\t- "i''''.,T---).-ALr ;,,,M,''..:,_,..';1".-!:1;*::"::: 1;f 'w 'fir '. ,•. _` . . 8r- * . ` Tam .. ' �j f Est �� ; ; k Fi d .My a F � ' 1. , r � �S r w . .^ 14. Looking west at reinforcement area from lower portion of slide scarp area. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 25 EM , :. of 3E1{ 'y ox nk �Y b1" 15.Nice Douglas fir with broken top to north of road access(good eagle habitat). ' ' \+ tr r a?� f - Rk f 16. Looking down(west)from approximate location of top of slide scarp and access road area. Note partial house and propane tank view on left side of photo. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 26 rk b r�•, f t tJk..e \,y; .y 4,4,y, om•c +: ► t4 4 . ,1• - r \ pi 4 ti r: : a page4._- . .4 i. 17. Beach area looking east up the slope.The maple tree in the middle will be removed. : ' 4 { -' �A _ Ri ':S' S� ''''.',1.,..4.:':,:'", .4....f RSK-„,-,-„ : .�... ':.:.1.". ,mow y d:t M a a v+ "#'_! rte �. r! �a, '41.:,.--,='„.b--'k,:_ �' -,7 F 'C r ,'..,;,1r..; at -.6 R # e.- 18. looking east(uphill from propane tank)to mitigation area between slide scarp and proposed access road. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property•27 Jeffers C19.ounty Contours Environmntally Streams Sensitive•as. and e DNR LOG ITE- /, Pa _-4 25- ! � ''� 1 x .trig f�°) I� f�,_1 .� DNR Streams {{ rIKC '2 . , t iW°2°eq /01_344049 <3 701344031 G, '. '144052 TO1344O1A+1st—f- s r _ -C F-Fish Habitat = , F'p i 101344052 ax ;�"f f•ter•t{''�.•},' :lt?i34AO1A .ik - �':EB. }r��{+tFF � f1 t ��,�* N-Non-fish Habitat 701344O45 f' 1{ii3444�34 ?O1344O34_,,,-..0-,--4-> 134AO43 °t i -'-' Np•Nondisb habitat,po m mai- - f i- 434 ' - -)y 134 .F'_=° ' ID '}};m rf 1i7i34AQ r 1Oi3+�4O1O IQi4+'It?1d?4'(, ` i Ns-Nen-�FishHabhat-Saasoa� wa,y,...+6-; �,�s��,ll 7�3i34402 `` '-- r iv Ade S-Invonfin�iad Sho�aiino 70134401 70134 101 t.`�'r� !,+',,r '"' 1Jlt� 101344033 fi} 0 7O1344016 f y + 134A0i;3 101344026 f 70134;01£+ 1 . 4 --;" 47 1t' '":''r '1344050 i 7013+44046 7O134403 ���� , 'rt T(?i34Af�5i i i 1344047 o� �601031004 t:' `t ao 1, , PROJECT ;r . , •' ; ° r " OA'i '601032021.) t 6Oio3i.r �rr+ i 5 -:.--4',e4)4, x as .r1 ,.... „.... �— ►��tiii \ ti brF„....---:,:.--:,. 1 1 11�� 1� iii 1032 Y23 �/ � t S � f -/- Iti, _ � a ; A 1 Q" 2A, s it' � -21.0 f f if t ee � „ rr ... . y D.h' « `,,,,p. Ra ,Yn.:.. 'it 41Tianoos �...=';!ems ~ -f� ,y'��C�.. � �`,�'�m�.."'�,31£ /'1 �� �•e"�tiC'iti4L _._ �� �'+- ate.lowr,r am_� '_"1 ,.',04,,�f 3.,, { X 601032002 am.. �`um �Yi?,�'`�r"'. ' ti• 1O3SOi4} � � 61O310O6 : ar C46O1O32O0W' 0 `*m``=• ';_�`� ; _ 3� i . . MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 28 0 20. Seismic Hazards LOG ITEM " I& Page of 0_ _ .. , , .. . .,,..,,;."44..'....,,,,,,Y,'",- /',,' ', —, c J; ... , ,'.,,''.1.'=i.'':..' '7,' '. ,. .. .-- .*:' 0, m 5 b „. ,/•''' ,p� U • oti T`; x 1 r 0f1 r - T { ,,,,....,.,:,..;,,.,:...,*-,.# - . t 1 _ 10 +y�3 . -• -Seismic Hazard r.o�SGlS tr- � r � } MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 29 • 0 21. Landslide Hazards LOG ITE-: ',1 1*_________I —--- Page_ /)_ _ ..,_____ SI 12•40°' •e) ',1,'4'- 1 . • ,c- ° A• , &•i•1-P'-' , , ---..... ......... - #11 ,., `,°.., •°-,," •,/,',,-;,-,••• ; z•,. ' q3) ' , , !,. A'-''', "' ""k '1,■.,i" . - .........- '''--V;'1. '4.?"'",:=7VP#1' 1-P".3'',:1, ',"'' ' - ' . ,,w,41111.. ''. -#,....■- ''':,4>Ai',-'-fC"'4,'"':':';‘,,k1 ii,t.ike,'7':''':11'i,i4V 1*' ' • *""''''''''..*'. '''..'-- WI' : ti"' 1,-;'°:'' .g.e...'-'107`., ,14 ,,,_L __,-; ,.• ,' . • I ,,,,-, . ------:' 1 '- --,--------;---- ,..,,,,. 1 ' --r-t--- ,,,--,-- .- ..... - imp -_ ,)-,ta , . , ,,-A.' fti,..- -,),.„,,,,-,, '''' .' ' •:;,. , '''\ 113 _- . '- '-- '''1:. y'''' 71. ' 47'-' ''''".,14'''' tt ------14.', :-:, .' 44.4t.,..-!7litfic7.,tr t) _ - ' . ; - e\f,.1'- ' , , .,:,... -,f , ■'",.;'",:.."1', }it .„,: 4 k f, 1re Cre. ,, :,•• -''''''' ' ' Hazard t , ., ...... ...,,, - ' Landslide ----- La h4: - , - *4k.,,,f4,1,1 14 ' - tilg ,, , ti .t 4 ,.---, - Moderate e- 4 - ,,,..-,..,,.,,,. sbght , . -,:.-.... . 4,....4.... i 100 ',.,..,,:....,,,- ,, .. -,-' - . _ ..,-- ;ant ces GLS. MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 30 . . LOG IT .:\: • 22. Critical Aquifer Recharge SiIT:: .: ",•,„,, -N ' , i 0 .e. , '.--,,,,,i ? / (--) -.:7 _ - 4, ,,,,,,,j/1 sv:---01,' _4,..4=',4.t.--i....,t, ,,,.:;4:11::::e;-:,,,y ief i --c, - - . L-., ,..- fr',. 4-str7,,,,i4,51.144T-rler.:rt i . ‘-- ,. - 5, ,,,,„„:1/4.,,4,544,..1. , ,',,,.=,s• q*.'i i - j i f :'-A-.ANY, ,.• -,, . .50 Critical Aquifer Recharge • -1',44tA.',s•Aelp-1:-: , , _ _ ., - Areas SUSCUNK ,' .,,, eel"- , ---- . j___ - D _-- , _ q,*-,..ili , . -- - El SARPA 4.SUSC 4' '' ' 1E susc 4 1. / IN SARPA , r....„ SARPA*tINK Wo 1" i.65' ,4 L,--? c --„) . m GIS MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property• 31 • • 23. Shoreline Slope Stability • I__C)C--. # /3 Page b2-. S (..., ,. ,,„,... -I. ,- ,. ,i-::•, .--.., -,- -----.7„..,3,,s, 0. . '7-.7.-.- "goir_44. CD . , „i...:.:-,,,, ''. ' ti...',.--'771,:t Shoreline Slope Stability -- ,..:,-,i-,,,,,,, ,...,,,, , t ( ,,:,,,,,, , . ! 1 ,---..f ri Stzgrio ' ***A" ":',1F.Sf,;`, j -5 c9, ,,* ..4 ..--;,!;,1,-- -_,,,,,,-..!,,,' -.7, E3 Intermediate ,',:;..,--, .-,.,"iv,.., i „ ti , _ . , , „., . .- '—'s! tP'..'. - . • ,,,,,,- ED nstab4a e . ..:, , , . unstable Recant Landsbde - q'jr.:.'ill - : . - MUnstable°id Landslide .--;;':'. --,..:..;'...-1-''' '-'-'';',, # ::1 $- 11111 Medifind i2 . . -,.? ▪''. :'' •-‘ -, 1.-§:1 --A (--",▪ 111,-,,,,, ,.1 . . 4,',.:,... i-4,,,,,„....,,,, . ......., .....- ..----:, ,,...i: / ',',,t,AV-P;le:;,!•-•*..,"q44.),,,,,,.4 '...` ' 4 '4:?'.;*:-. ' tfimTti+, .-- • ,,,„,,...,,,e„,,,,,,;,,, ,,.,.1,,,,'0,00,X3ZW,,i•'..,,,4. ;I 6,. ,,,,,,: ''.., '..:, 0) ' ,,`' C) , ,,,t1t;?1,5114ttAkif:4..:1:4:v'',.'',;i'.7.'* '''''':. ''1**24''':,,1'" 41' ',' '' ''',,.: , ,■ ,L: , '- .r.,.,..'-='-''..t. ' '-':-_, _ 1:--- - at i, ,,, , ?,:,.v.': '',' ,;J.,.'-'::',::-,•,' ' -',,,,,,:5 ,,;`, 'r'-'1' ' . .!....,--.4. i:-'..,-*',..';,',:i''N',','--'',...,',4.44t,.=--- -_-,, ," ..-_ 0 __ ..-7.1,--1., -- -, r %! ‘ ' .i' . C. '".,N..p'N.7:'.:*.-,.-ii.4",-,::'!,0t1k--I ''.-,-, ', •'''''''.,,,,.:::, :-''''- ':,",,'"-" °O ":"'°-.7,-;*.---,,"-;%---7'-,-'---".--,_.:',',,:::;`,.; '-''i';.1' 7",',-7?-'1.27-- - '.,Ii;',%".'''71•#-`-:J..'4,,,,`.:0 ',3' --:- ,-.;----?---,--,-.-..-.-''....t.,--';',,,,,k,..- .,:.>:",:.,:,'.., .-.-"':-,-:''-'77-''''''",,,jj ,t..'`‘,,-",:('''',.' :--;.---..,-,-,,,,------.;7---- 0 '''1'''*';4111'''°,':itthr$4: .' ',, ':'.•.'-z''.., --z,-,' .4,r e--,'"--,, •; °,,", „,,,,,.,,..,>,' ,,, , ---_- .: .. - ,._.:-- -*-,"0 ,,,:,',',.'---... ., -i* -„._.---,.,---:7. ,,, -” *-".." ".- '„. .:'*„.,:::::.*1,*,, ;,, .:,",,....",„_.,,,-,,,i*:.,_,„!.., toio..- 7-i41' r,-T-n-:.-.-, -' - "'T '-'.J?)"..;,'.i: 4*-it- 7,..i'' .' ..,,,.., - ,..,-.,„ ,„'.'.,, '-.,- -'-.--2001- 4.,-:-._-7-,'.,-' '. : ' .-.:..1.,'-' --_,--'; -7S,..•;" , .. .., . . MS&A Landslide Remediation-Critical Areas Stewardship Plan-Adachi Property • 32 Asikt Consulting Geotech Report Additum NOTE:"Revised Figure A"referred to in the Geotech Report is divided into Figures 2-6 above LOG ITEM Aspectconsulting earth+water March 5,2010 1� Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject: Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report Dated October 27,2008 1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove,Washington Design of Slope Buttress Project No.080029-002-01 Reference: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT,Landslide Remediation-Adachi Property,1253 Deer Creek Road Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008, prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Mr.Adachi: This addendum reflects a change in the design basis for the post-landslide conditions at your residence at 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove in Jefferson County,Washington.In the referenced original report,the site has been described and the geotechnical setting presented. The design recommendations presented in the report were for a proposed grade restoration for the original driveway along with toe buttress protection of the western portion north-facing slope.Since the presentation of the report,a determination has been made to temporarily move the driveway away from the landslide and that work has been completed.This temporary relocation has worked sufficiently that the need to re-establish grade for the alignment is no longer required. This addendum presents the design recommendations for a stabilizing buttress for the western end of the north-facing slope below the Adachi residence.Data presented in the original report are not repeated herein except where they add clarity. Description of Existing Slope Condition As shown on the revised Figure A,a mechanically reinforced earth(MRE)slope buttress will be used to prevent further sliding from the over steepened bluff slope to the north and northwest of the existing residence.This natural slope has developed into this geometry because of the long-term east-west landslide feature immediately to the north of the house. This last movement was the reason for the study for restoration of the driveway.The height of slope in the area of the buttress varies between 50 and 25 feet.The natural slope grade varies between 140 percent and 100 percent,respectively.Extensive colluvial movements were noted across the slope with jacked-straw trees and trees with large pistol butt curvatures indicative of surface movement.Various areas of new growth intermixed with older growth were also indicative of isolated surface slides which have failed in the recent past.The lower east-west landslide has prevented a large natural buttress from being created and as such,the steady 179 Madrone Lane North Bainbridge island,WA 98110 Tel (206)780.9370 Fax.(2061 780-9438 www.aspectconsulting.corn a limited liability company MS&A Landslide Remediation—Critical Areas Stewardship Plan—Adachi Property• 33 LOG ITEM ------Tr Seiichi Adachi March 5,2010 Project No.080029-002-01 surface failure of the slope continues with resultant movement of the top of slope back through the developed areas of the yard and toward the residence. Design Recommendations for MRE Buttress As shown on revised Figure A,a reinforced slope is proposed which begins at approximately 60 feet elevation and then descends at a grade of 1.3H to 1V(Horizontal:Vertical)to where the toe of the slope is truncated by the ground surface or at the working offset from the 15-foot elevation of the ground.At this point,the MRE continues vertically to reach undisturbed consolidated native soil(either advance outwash or lacustrine clay).Because of the existing steepness of the slope,the MRE installation is stopped near the top where a MRE thickness of 5 feet cannot be maintained without excavating in-situ hard soils.Above this area,the surface is protected with rockery armor rock which would be placed from the top of the slope.Details for the anticipated heights and limits of the MRE slope are shown on revised Figure A.Details of the sections are also shown on revised Figure A. Stability of Slope and Buttress Given that this area of the site does not contain the current landslide(i.e.,it has glacial consolidated material throughout the height of the slope),a slightly lower PGA for this soil column of 0.34g was used.This results in a seismic coefficient of 0.17g for the seismic case. Using the"Slide"computer program,factors of safety against failure were determined.A minimum factor of safety for the static case of 1.5 was noted,and a minimum factor of safety of 1.2 for the seismic case was noted,using the above seismic coefficient.These values are found to be acceptable within the current state of the practice of geotechnical engineering and many stated agency minimums. Construction Details of the construction placement are found on revised Figure A.If there are any further questions,please contact us for any clarification.Aspect Consulting,LLC recommends that our staff be on site during critical steps in the construction to aid in field evaluation and compliance with the recommendations. Limitations This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of Seiichi Adachi and his agents for specific application to this project.Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our letter was prepared.This letter is not a legal opinion and there is no other warranty,expressed or implied.Our observations,findings,and opinions are a means to identify and reduce inherent risks to the owners. Page 2 MS&A Landslide Remediation—Critical Areas Stewardship Plan—Adachi Property• 34 • • i Seiichi Adachi March 5,2010 Project No.080029-002-01 Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you.If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. LOG Sincerely, LOG IT Aspect consulting,LLC Page of so R 4 ( s, A/ Nop .d ®....AL Tay John L.Peterson,PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson@aspectconsulting.com Attachment: Figure A—Site Plan,Cross Sections,Details and Notes cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders W:LGEOTECHt080029 Adachi Landslide lDelhrerablesSAddandum to Reportdoc ' Page 3 MS&A Landslide Remediation—Critical Areas Stewardship Plan—Adachi Property• 35 CRITICAL AktAb ISUNv WUAN I I, I vvI.JMnaritt E � 'Ne • • JEFFERSON COUNTY i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend• Washington 98368 ____,,,,,i),�� � 360/379-4450 "' 360/379-4451 Fax Lai ITEM N� � CRITICAL AREAS BOND QUANTITY WORKSHEET Project Name: Landslide Remediation Applicant:Derek Adachi MLA NUMBER: CSP NUMBER: Prepared By: Marine Surveys&Assessments Date: 1/11/2011 PLANT MATERIAL Quantity Price Unit Total Cost Vegetation Trees 29 $ 7.00 1 gallon $ 203.00 Trees 1 $ 15.00 2 gallon $ 15.00 Shrubs 23 $ 6.00 1 gallon $ 138.00 Shrubs 11111111.1 $ 14.00 2 gallon $ - Herbaceous 33 $ 3.00 4" pots $ 99.00 Herbaceous 111111111.1111 $ 6.00 1 gallon $ Grasses MEM plug $ Sedges& Rushes IIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIEIEO plug $ - FernsM $ 5.00 1 gallon Seed Mixes 1111111111111111 $ 25.00 pound $ - Other(list): $ 111111111.1111 $ Other (list): 11 �i $ - Other(list): OIIIIIIIIIIIEMIIIMIIIIIIOIIIIMI $ Soil Amendments Fertilizer $ 20.00 cubic yard $ Mulch 30 $ 17.00 cubic yard $ 510.00 Topsoil $ 36.00 cubic yard $ Other(list): , 111181111111MMimm $. - Other(list): 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 $ Other(list): 111111.1111 111111111111111111 $ Labor 20 $ 71.00 hour $ 1,420.00 Subtotal-Plant Material $ 2,385.00 Page 1 t k1 I i4KL Artriko oury J WUHrd 11 I T vvkncr1.onCC i • SITE PREPARATION Quantity Price INEE11111 Total Cost Clear and grub 11111.11111. $ 1,850.00 0331111111111 $ - Excavation, dozer 11111111111 $ 9.75 cubic yard $ - Grading 111111111111111 $ 0.11 square foot Other(list): ■■1111 ® Other(list): M■I Labor IIIIMMIIIII $ 71.00 hour > is Subtotal -Site Preparation $ - HABITAT FEATURES Quantity Price T otal Cost Logs " ■ - Root Wads IIIIIIIIIMIIEIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIII $ - Woody Debris 111111 - Rocks $ 26.25 ton - Clean Gravel $ $ - Snags Weir $ - Other(list): IIIIIIIIIIIINIIIBIMNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ Other(list): IIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIII Labor $ 71,00 hour - Subtotal-Habitat Features $ - EROSION CONTROL Quantity Price Unit Total Cost Silt fence $ 30.00 linear foot - Jute matting/Organic fibers $ 1.68 square yard $ - Mulch $ 41.25 cubic yard $ - Rip rap $ 63.75 cubic yard $ - Straw bales $ 3.00 linear foot $ - Other(list): $ $ - Other(list): $ - $ .. Labor $ 71.00 hour $ - Subtotal -Erosion Control $ - FENCING Quantity Price Unit Total Cost Fencing, chain link,6' high $ 35.25 . linear foot $ - Fencing, split rail, 3' high $ $ - Fencing,gate(s) $ Other(list): $ $ - Other(list): $ - $ - Labor $ 71.00 hour $ - Subtotal-Fencing $ - Page 2 CRITICAL. AKIAS ISUNIJ ta/UAN I I I I VirUllts.Z1-1tr* • e, ..-- .. MONITORING/MAINTENANCE Quantity Price Uni ota • As-built Report _ 2 $ 71.00 hour $ 142.00 - Year 1 Monitoring Report 4 $ 71.00 hour $ 284.00 Year 2 Monitoring Report 4 $ 71.00 hour $ 284.00 Year 3 Monitoring Report 4 $ 71.00 hour $ 284.00 Year 4 Monitoring Report 4 $ 71.00 hour $ 284.00 Year 5 Monitoring Report 4 $ 71.00 hour $ 21?•4.00 Hydroseeding IIIIIIIIIIIIII $ 0.44 square foot $ Irrigation -temporary _ $ - $ - Irrigation-water truck $ 385.00 day $ - Irrigation-other(specify) $ - $ - Year 1 Maintenance Site Visit 1111110111111 $ 71.00 hour $ 213.00 Year 2 Maintenance Site Visit 1111111011111 $ 71.00 hour $ 213.00 Year 3 Maintenance Site Visit 11111=111 $ 71.00 hour $ 213.00 Year 4 Maintenance Site Visit 111=111111 $ 71.00 hour $ 213.00 Year 5 Maintenance Site Visit $ 71.00 hour $ 213.00 Other(list): 111. $ - $ Other(list): IIIIOIIIIIIIIBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ - Labor 111111.11111111 $ 71.00 hour $ Subtotal-Monitoring/Maintenance $ 2,627.00 OTHER ITEMS Quantity Price 11111011.1 Total Cost List: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHEIIIIIMIIIIIIUIIIIIIMIIIIII $ - List: $ - $ - - List: IIIMI $ $ List: IIIIIIIIIIIHIMIIIMI $ - List: 1111111111111110111111111111111111111111 $ - List: 11111111111. $ - $ - Labor III/IIIIIII. $ 71.00 hour $ - Subtotal -Other Items $ - Subtotal-All Items $ 5,012.00 20% Contingency&Mobilization $ 1,002.40 TOTAL BOND AMOUNT $ 6,014.40 Page 3 (360)297-2308 Fax • LOG ITEM Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address �• •�, -, ,'.:4 of 2 • • t Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:23 PM L C ITEM To: Donna Frostholm ? / Subject: RE: Adachi �� I Appreciate your reply Donna and anything that can be done to get this permit moving for everyone. How often do the Hearings take place? Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360)297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jennv@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm [maiito:dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:17 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Hi Jenny: I received your submittal on January 27. I have a backlog right now, but hope to get to this one next week. After reviewing the submittal, I will get back to you with timelines. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:18 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, We mailed to you the original copy of the packet for the Adachi submittal along with the CASP submittal fee. I wanted to confirm your receipt of this and also see what the timeline from here is for the permitting process and Hearing. Appreciate your update. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 1 • Donna Frosthoim From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] . Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 1:33 PM E To: Donna Frostholm -- � Cc: cspowell@silverlink.net RE: Adachi -A& I of Donna, Just thought I would check in with you on Adachi's review progress. Thank you in advance! Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360)297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frosthoim [mailto:dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:17 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Hi Jenny: I received your submittal on January 27. I have a backlog right now, but hope to get to this one next week. After reviewing the submittal, I will get back to you with timelines. Donna Frosthoim Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:18 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, We mailed to you the original copy of the packet for the Adachi submittal along with the CASP submittal fee. I wanted to confirm your receipt of this and also see what the timeline from here is for the permitting process and Hearing. Appreciate your update. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten 1 • • Asect LOG ITEM CONSULTING March 10,2011 The Estate of Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject: Update on Schedule of Work for Slope Buttress 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove,Washington Project No. 080029-00]-03 References: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT, Landslide Remediation -Adachi Property, 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report, Dated October 27, 2008, 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington,Design of Slope Buttress, dated March 5,2010,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Executors of the Estate: At the request of your contractor, Aspect Consulting,LLC has evaluated starting work before June of 2011. If the work is delayed to June,the possibility of more surficial slides between now and June is very high and will potentially increase the volume of restoration work to be done on the project.The design of the project will allow it to proceed at this time of year, due to the all-weather nature of the lower site soils and fill materials. Controlled scaling of the surface is going to create less volume than unabated surface landsliding. We would encourage the permit reviewers to allow this work now and the contractor to use wet weather construction techniques to make progress in controlling this slope. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspect consulting, LLC �v.PE7'E'+roc 5O ;v ! io O 18802 e. 10/ 1:cf, 1ST John L.Peterson, PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson@aspectconsulting.com cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders(via Email) W:\ GEOTECH\080029 Adachi LandsiidetDeliverables\March 2011 Construction Letter.doc H— Aspect Consulting,LW 179 Medici*Lane N. Bainbridge.Island,WA 98110 206.780.9370 www.aspectconsuiting.com • • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] LOG ITEM Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:52 PM To: Donna Frostholm 1/5 Subject: Adachi Attachments: Adachi March 2011 Construction Letter.pdfage 1 of g. Donna, Attached please find a letter from the Adachi's geo-technical experts urging the completion of the work at the site to be done as soon as possible. Once you return to the office and review this letter let us know. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:58 PM LOG ITEM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: schirmms @DFW.WA.GOV Subject: Re: Adachi �, Attachments: Adachi revised submittal pages.pdf Page of Donna, With the entire project being behind the OHW line,we were not anticipating needing a HPA from WDFW. I have cc'd this to Margie for her comments. Margie, the plans,JARPA, etc. are attached for your review to confirm the location and scope of all the work. Please advise as to whether a HPA is indeed required for the work. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:03 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: There is a planning meeting tomorrow afternoon and the Planning Manager will be there. I will be taking the letter that was prepared by the geotech to the meeting for the Planning Manager to review. She is the one who has the authority to determine if the Jefferson County Code requirement for emergency construction in shorelines can be met. I will get back to you tomorrow afternoon. Donna From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:46 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Donna, Just following up to our email to you with the letter from Aspect Consulting. I believe Sandy from our office left you a message this morning as well. 1 Let me know if the next step is gettifrou the exemption fee you mentione•Sandy in order to keep things moving. I would be happy to get this to you ASAP! 'Appreciate your assistance. Best regards. Jenny Rotsten 4.4 ITEM Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc �. PO Box 375 of 9-d, Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 4:07 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Based on the information submitted, I can now notice the application. I will be out of the office for the next two weeks, but can plan to notice the application during the week of March 21. For this to happen, Sealevel would need to (1) be available to pick up the noticing packet on Tuesday, March 22; (2) have the notice of application posted on the Adachi property by Wednesday, March 23; and (3) have the signed and notarized affidavit of posting returned to me by Monday, March 28. Does that work for you? Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 1:33 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: cspowell @silverlink.net Subject: RE: Adachi Donna, Just thought I would check in with you on Adachi's review progress. Thank you in advance! Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 2 (360)297-2308 Fax • Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] LOG ITEM Sent:Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:17 PM ^sr. To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Page of 9-a Hi Jenny: I received your submittal on January 27. I have a backlog right now, but hope to get to this one next week. After reviewing the submittal, I will get back to you with timelines. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:18 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, We mailed to you the original copy of the packet for the Adachi submittal along with the CASP submittal fee. I wanted to confirm your receipt of this and also see what the timeline from here is for the permitting process and Hearing. Appreciate your update. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360)297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 3 • • • wW 1Ml BULKHEAD BUILDERS January 18,2011 LOG !TEM � Donna Frostholm • Jefferson County DCD,Planner 2._ Of as 621 Sheridan Street F�--4-- Port Townsend,WA 98368 RE: Site address:1253 Deer Creek Rd Case#MlA-10-00155 Dear Ms.Frostholm, In response to your letter dated June 14,2010 regarding the above mentioned project,this letter and its enclosures aim to fulfill your requirements for this submittal.The following is the punch list of required items for the permit and how we have supplied the requested material: • The Critical Areas Stewardship Plan(CASP):This has been completed and submitted to you by Marine Surveys and Assessments. • Bald Eagle Management Plan:The signed plan is enclosed for the file. • JARPA and Stormwater Calculation Worksheet:The JARPA has been revised.The name on the JARPA has been updated as Mr.Adachi has since passed away.Please note this change as needed.The completion of the CASP also changed the answers to 8c and 8d.Additionally,the answers regarding fill materials(6a,6d,8e,and 8f) have all been revised to detail the amount of fill from 1-2 man rock,2-3 man rock,geo-grid fill,and crushed rock for the access road.The total of these fill materials,+1-1097 cubic yards,has been noted on the revised • Stormwater Calculation Worksheet,page 1,as well.With the change to the access road,which now utilizes more of the existing driveway for access as opposed to impacting additional land for access,there is a change to the Total Land Disturbance.The revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet shows the updated square footage calculations for the rockery,slope,and total.Both the revised JARPA and Stormwater Calculation Worksheet are enclosed. • Cross Section BB:The plans,as originally submitted,are correct. • Equipment Use:There will be no equipment used on the beach for the proposed work.All work will be completed from behind the OHW mark. • Reduced Plans:A reduced set of revised plans has been enclosed. Please advise should you have any further requirements for the permit process for this project to proceed.Thank you in advance for your timely review. Best ards, Jen Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Inc. (360)297-2401 Cc: Yoko Adachi,via email c/o Derek Adachi P.O. Box 375, Kingston, Washington 98346 • (360) 297-2401 • Fax (360) 297-2308 0 III • 4 LOG ITEM r "''' ^--..-..&. ,,,,....... WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act(RCW 77.12.655) and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules(WAC 232-12-292) - Not for Subdivisions,Short Plats,or Conversions Bald Eagle Territory: Occurrence#f .2-g Nest# / Proposed Activity: 6t i o.._v- CONDITIONS:All known bald eagle nest trees(active or alternate)and winter roost sites are protected. The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: CONDITION 1: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch trees, all na e conifers and all black cottonwood trees >24 inches diameter at breast height(diameter 4.5 feet from ground,known as d.b.h). Also retain>50°l0 of coniferous and cottonwood trees<24 inches d.b.h. and>6 feet tall,with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest free. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30%of the live crown is removed.Topping of trees is not allowed. ❑ CONDITION 2: This parcel is located>400 feet and < 80.0 feet of a bald eagle nest or within '/2 mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline. Retain all known perch trees, and 75%native conifers and cottonwoods>24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood frees <24 inches d.b.h. and 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage,root injury or severance,or- root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan.Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed..Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above •ndition 'laced op Parcel#&0/ 03 0. O ) with a street address of . 0_, . k- ` i qej q'i� .If the conditions set forth above are acceptable,please sign .elow an• this will serve .� your Bald Eagle Management Plan.Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. _ C_-- A p4y i/i -f1J WDFW Regional Wildlife Manager L.14o er Signaturel,Q.►-f- (Date) l'nfw - lea it..v-e c Su tICIA-tcL &&ti fdcA- Landowner Print Name City/County Official (Date) Po b2ce 3.i-s. Address Kry S v, , tit hi- Rt31-H40 Send Copy To: City,State,Zip Jeff Skriletz,District Wildlife Biologist WDFW Region 6, 48-B Devonshire Rd. 3 pt? Z4q-`Zofo Montesano,WA 98563-9618 Phone Fax:(360)249-1229 • Page o f a., AGENCY USE ONLY 2 0 1 0 Date received: US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE ofEnginee1rs, Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form TaxParcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BELOW. Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name(A name for your project that you create. Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help)2 Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2—Applicant The person or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name(Last, First,Middle)and Organization(if applicable) Yoko Adachi 2b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2c. City, State, Zip Seatac,WA 98188-2313 2d. Phone(1) 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2g. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi @comcast.net Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b. of this application.) [help[ 3a. Name(Last, First,Middle)and Organization (if applicable) Rotsten, Jennifer—Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) PO Box 375 Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/P ublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=m ainpage_ESA • If you are applying for an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization you will need to fill out and submit an Application for Authorization to Use State- Owned Aquatic Lands form to DNR,which can be found at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/aqr_use_auth_app.doc • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you think you will need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they will accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias_resourcecenter/jarpaiarpa_form/9984/jarpa_form.aspx. For other help.contact the Governor's Office of Reoulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or helona ora.wa.aov. • LOG ITEM 3c. City, State, Zip Parje_g of Kingston,WA 98346 3d. Phone(1) 3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3g. E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 sealevelbb @silverlink.net Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. [help) // Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle)and Organization(if applicable) 4b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 4c. City, State, Zip 4d. Phone(1) 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4g. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [helps ❑There are multiple project locations(e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ❑ State Owned Aquatic Land (If yes or maybe,contact the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)at(360)902-1100) ❑ Federal ❑ Other publicly owned (state,county, city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑Tribal ® Private 5b. Street Address(Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 1253 Deer Creek Rd. 5c. City, State,Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene,WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson • • LOG ITEM 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] Page 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (NAD 83) 4746'48.09" N/ 12747'30.72"W 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [helpi • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) Jeffery & Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 Alan &Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish,WA 98290 5i. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] N/A 5j. List all waterbodies(other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] Deciduous & evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos enclosed. 1 � • • 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. lhelpl SFR LOG ITEM Page of AA 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. lhelpl SFR 50. Describe the structures(above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s). lhelpi Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location,and attach a map. [help] From Hwy 104, turn onto S Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd,follow for 8.5 miles, turn left onto Coyle Rd, and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road all the way to the water. • • LOG ITEM Part 6—Project Description Page p9 of 6a. Summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6d. [help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. Approximately+/-25 yards of 1-2 man rock, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill, +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock, and 30 yards of crushed rock will be installed. Geo-grid will be installed,spacing as per plans, see attached plans prepared by Aspect Consulting. 6b. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial ® Residential ❑ Institutional ❑Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6c. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Road ® Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Marina/Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Ouffall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Piling ❑ Utility Line ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway (upland) ❑ Other: 6d. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. [help] • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain. As shown on the plans,the slope will be cleaned d all organics; logs and root wads will be salvaged and used along the toe of the MRE wall when completed. Loose material will be removed from the slide area.The new toe will be excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions Layer specified geo-grid and compact material as directed by geo-tech. The rock armor on the top of the slope will be placed along a >1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5'where <1:1, 1-2 man size rock may be used. The construction road will be created for access and left intact when work is complete. Drainage will be installed as needed based on engineer and/or agency requirements based on conditions.The access area will be re-vegetated once work is complete. Bare surfaces will be covered with temporary erosion control and native plantings completed for permanent erosion control along access, new reinforced slope, and mitigation/monitoring area. See plans and CASP for more details. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction?(month/year) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: Spring 2011 End date: +/-14 day duration ❑ See JARPA Attachment D • • 6f. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [help] A slide that occurred at the site during the winter of 2007-2008 removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The proposed work will restore and stabilize the slide area and prevent be I1 7 tability. Page . f 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $100,000.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help] • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑Yes ® No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)Iheip] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [helpl ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If yes,submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] • If yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. El Voe El Ntn n rlrn'+Irnn,n, • • 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? fheipl • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑Yes [1] No ❑ Not applicable �" ITEM Page ' o 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. Ihelpl 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted; the extent and duration of the impact; and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table,you can state(below)where we can find this information in the plan. Iheipl Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain,excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq.ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as'Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. `Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h., describe the source and nature of the fill material,the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. rheipl • • 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h., describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. Ihelpm LOG ITEM # /(p Page ) -;. ap Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [helps Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] Li Not applicable All work will be completed above the OHW line. Any work near the shoreline that requires access or close proximity to the shoreline will be completed at low tides. The proposed re-vegetation of the slope will enhance the habitat at the site. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help] E Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies?[help] • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable Please review submitted CASP for mitigation and monitoring. i t 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g.,you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] '[y L G 3 l Please review submitted GASP { � _.�i. . 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. Ihelpl Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq.ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location' impact3 to be placed in or linear ft.)of drive, etc.) removed from waterbody waterbody directly affected FILL:1-2 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW -FILL: Geogrid fill Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-1017 yards landward of OHW -FILL: 2-3 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW FILL: Crushed Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-30 yards rock landward of OHW 1If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2lndicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e., describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. Ihelpi Fill will consist of: +/-25 yards of 1-2 man rock +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock +/-1017 yards of geo-grid fill,to be compacted to min 95% maximum of proctor std ASTM D-698/Source unknown at this time. +/-30 yards of crushed gravel for access road 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e., describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] , • • N/A LOG ITEM #........._,/, Pace 1 f ? Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. Ihelol Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 Dec 2010 Department of Ecology Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? Ihelpi • If yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.qov/proqrams/wq/303d/. ❑ Yes ® No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code(HUC) is the project in? [helot • Go to http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.q_ov/programs/wq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. LOC ITEM r•"ag2 ( .of a ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [help] • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help[ • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.00v/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertvpinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help[ • If no, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ®Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help[ SFR 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑Yes ® No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Salmon, bald eagle 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] • • Unknown LOG ITEM /6 Page 12i Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecv.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or help(a�ora.wa.gov. • For a list of agency addresses to send your application, click on the "where to send your completed JARPA" at http://www.epermitting.wa.gov. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply.) iheipl • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. f I • LOG ITEM Page 5 ��°` ®A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson County (lead agency). The expecte. .ecigibri date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 1 ob.)[helps ❑This project is exempt(choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [help{ LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Resources Use Authorization FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [help 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [helpi I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. • • Part 11—Authorizing Signatures LOG ITEM Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. Page_ 11a. Applicant Signature(required) fhelpl I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and l agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. • I hereby authoriz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, i state that I have the authority to grant access to the property_ I also-give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. <'- '— (initial) _ Applicant Da 1L'�4C art :NCac 11 b. Authorized Agent Signature fhelpl I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. 4.14LAri.16" 409 it 0 Authoriz-)4' 't i, Y.�� \. Date • 11c. Property Owner Signature(if not applicant) fhelpl I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. . Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA).People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number. ENV-019-09 DARPA 2009 Page 11 of 11 • • LOG ITEM .1"5°14,10e06, JEFFERSON COUNTY 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450•360/379-4451 Fax http://www.00.jefferSon.wa.us/commdeveiopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet lA# ()O to 3 2-02-0 PROJECTIAPPUCANTNAME: Ad0,( 1 DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as`'small,"'medium,"or large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application,building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel (•l% acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 309 i c--t. sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results In movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative)and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading,filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared,graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert' acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. 0 sg/ft Circle: _ Yes Well,utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2%acres or more of . native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. ? L) sq/ft 123UGcr Circle: Yes /NoJ Lawn,landscaping,ett. 3 9.5 sq/ft Other compac ei surface,etc. 7.?;—.00 sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance SZZS sq/ft Cut 'l-500 Fill O ' (cu/yd) •[over] '/ 1.11.11‘ • stomata'Gals worksheet-REV,2J20/2008 • pLOG ITEM rage impervious surface Is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water Into the soil mantle as undettural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface In greater quantities or at an Increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas,concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,packed earthen materials, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATiONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING 1aops/` Structures(all roof area) _D ' split Structures(all roof area) /3 4 0 68.40 sglft Sidewalks ` t� sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios r s 1- sgift Solid Decks T) sqlft Solid Decks 02 et 12 sgift (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) c^ Driveway,parking,roads,etc sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads,etc :7 d sq/ft Other ` V sq/ft Other // setft Total New D h '� sq/ft Total Existing %�.. 7 7 D sgift TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING" 6*7 tt sq/ft 'This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existins impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: tea- % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: if the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for storrnwater management DOD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP) Best Management Practices(BMPs)Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for"large' projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a-submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Storrrvwafer Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, i as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein Is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDO - • AUTHOR ri D REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) ' v aromnveter eat worksheet—REV.2n00366 2 I • • • • P 8.1.0-6Z0090.01.021.1.1.D.1.4a9V 67.008014,EM,0 LOG ITEM 8 4 h 1 , 9 - 2 • 1 2 e 5 4 4 i i a . ' f 1 Z 6 (5i5 o 8.1 I 0 0 w;•2 tr) g g 111 I ll 1 ih if - tl 1 11 i gi 0 i - II .,44 2 It ! II •I'la 2 I? il 110i g ere " rill 21 A, tin h .. 211i001 in PP 1 !loi . I g107„k■ . ag.31 ." g I Mt! T WV, 2 An. a is a I 1 g .1 11 2 . 3 g S R ii : 4 011 t Pil -u& 11 — -_ I \.\ I 'fii 1 la I I III' I 011 '7' fa 1 i 3.i-e/'s‘l 1 111-411111 ti k P. -E. 11 ki PE .. , ,...1, .:: , ... 1 ii iii it 1 111 , 4 a. t 7' 1 al 11. , .,\ ... ,_ _ l' .1 Apo il w ,, ,,--/-.:: _ N hp • 1. . ' ".V ._ -. ' P.i ' --- _ -1 ' \ il x ..." , - . i h h fl ' !I z a / ■ . e t.' t. lin iii 2 p i I/• , ,5-'' ,, \ I Ai 1 // n g le ii if,v z —,3 1 ig 41 .r www ,. . lie b - v POI ,‘ Plil , In III g • 1 : 1 , a g 1 il :IOW 6 ISMS 1 , i g•E. i i -g 81 In g 2 ' ." 9. ". Ial 1 l : ; ,Iii pi II 13.1 - o ' .. 5 • 4 30 iuil : i'z .., ,,,- i II I. II g ..,.i.1 iipo, la r it i ;•T O. 1.4 -?Cti H 6 I gi g H w in iiffi d 21t, 1- Donna Frostholm • • From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] �� Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:27 PM LU U To: Donna Frostholm 1 Subject: Re:Adachi _ --- r ge f Of II Donna, Got your message and just tried you back but got your voicemail. I will be out of the office for the rest of today, so I was hoping to touch base with you via email instead. I emailed Lisa to see what would work for a submittal time today or tomorrow to get this into you ASAP. In lieu of that, I was hoping to get a timeline from you to pass onto the owners if we ASSUME the proposal meets the Code requirements and can be processed right away. Does this mean we would have the approval in hand within a couple of weeks and the "after the fact" process would continue as originally planned? I understand you need time to review everything and confirm the project meets all Code requirements, so we are not necessarily looking for a specific approval date from you on the emergency exemption,just a rough idea for the owners and for our purposes for the construction timeline. Are there any comment or noticing periods we would have to wait to be completed before work could commence? Or, do these run as originally planned, while work is authorized to begin? Appreciate your assistance. I will have access to email today, so please feel free to email me back or give Sandy a call at the office 360-297-2401. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent:Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:17 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: Based on the stamped letter from Aspect,Jefferson County will issue an emergency shoreline exemption. Please submit a Master Permit Application with the box for shoreline exemption checked along with a copy of the site plan, a copy of the design sheets, and a check for$497. Once I receive this, I will begin working on issuing the shoreline exemption. If you decide to send in the shoreline exemption application, please address it to my attention so that permit intake will know who to ask if they have questions. If you decide to bring the application in, please contact our permit technician, Lisa, to schedule an appointment. Her phone number is 360-379-4452. 1 Please be aware that I have not compl my review of the proposal relative to Jef on County Code requirements for slope stabilization, and that any wor completed under the shoreline exemption eds to meet all Code requirements. Should it be determined that any work completed under emergency shoreline exemption does not meet Code requirements,then it will be the responsibility of the applicants to remove or revise the work to comply with Code (as well as SEPA) requirements. Since I will likely be working on this later this week or early part of next week, I am going to cancel noticing of the application for next week. I will get back to you later to re-schedule the notice of application for the shoreline substantial development application and SEPA. Regards, LOG ITEM 1 7 Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:58 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: schirmms @DFW.WA.GOV Subject: Re: Adachi Donna, With the entire project being behind the OHW line, we were not anticipating needing a HPA from WDFW. I have cc'd this to Margie for her comments. Margie,the plans,JARPA, etc. are attached for your review to confirm the location and scope of all the work. Please advise as to whether a HPA is indeed required for the work. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:03 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: There is a planning meeting tomorrow afternoon and the Planning Manager will be there. I will be taking the letter that was prepared by the geotech to the meeting for the Planning Manager to review. She is the one who has the authority to determine if the Jefferson County Code requirement for emergency construction in shorelines can be met. I will get back to you tomorrow afternoon. 2 ! I Donna From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] LOC ITEM Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:46 PM ..., To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi _g_ Donna, Just following up to our email to you with the letter from Aspect Consulting. I believe Sandy from our office left you a message this morning as well. Let me know if the next step is getting you the exemption fee you mentioned to Sandy in order to keep things moving. I would be happy to get this to you ASAP! Appreciate your assistance. Best regards. Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 4:07 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Based on the information submitted, I can now notice the application. I will be out of the office for the next two weeks, but can plan to notice the application during the week of March 21. For this to happen, Sealevel would need to (1) be available to pick up the noticing packet on Tuesday, March 22; (2) have the notice of application posted on the Adachi property by Wednesday, March 23; and (3) have the signed and notarized affidavit of posting returned to me by Monday, March 28. Does that work for you? Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 1:33 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: cspowell @silverlink.net Subject: RE: Adachi 3 • Donna, Just thought I would check in with you on Adachi's review progress. Thank you in advance! Best regards, Jenny Rotsten LOG ITEM Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 . J/ of (360)297-2401 (360)297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:17 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Hi Jenny: I received your submittal on January 27. I have a backlog right now, but hope to get to this one next week. After reviewing the submittal, I will get back to you with timelines. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:18 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, We mailed to you the original copy of the packet for the Adachi submittal along with the CASP submittal fee. I wanted to confirm your receipt of this and also see what the timeline from here is for the permitting process and Hearing. Appreciate your update. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 4 Donna Frostholm • • From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 11:52 AM �� To: Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW); Donna Frostholm LOG Subject: Re: Adachi Page t t�f4 Margie, All materials and equipment will access the site by land and all proposed work is behind OWH. If we can ensure that the machines will NOT need to complete any work from the beach, would we still need a HPA? And, if we do in fact need a HPA, with the County issuing an emergency exemption, what is your timeline for an approval as well? Appreciate your help Margie! -Jenny Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW) Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 11:11 AM To: Jenny Rotsten ; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Adachi Yes an HPA will be needed.Will you be accessing the site by water? From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:58 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW) Subject: Re: Adachi Donna, With the entire project being behind the OHW line, we were not anticipating needing a HPA from WDFW. I have cc'd this to Margie for her comments. Margie,the plans,JARPA, etc. are attached for your review to confirm the location and scope of all the work. Please advise as to whether a HPA is indeed required for the work. .,14/;));A""U '6_triad Best regards, P-1-4,02 ju 1 U • • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:38 AM To: Donna Frostholm LOG IT * Subject: Re: Adachi Page Thanks Donna. Keep us posted. `�----� -Jenny Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 5:30 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Hi Jenny: JC received the submittal. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:19 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Hi Donna. Just making sure you received the paperwork and the fee in the mail. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address � � p From: Donna Frostholm t/' Sent:Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:17 PM A o left�To: Jenny Rotsten '� Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: 1 Donna Frostholm • • LO ._. ITEM From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny@sealevelbb.com] Page , - { : Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:35 PM - To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Notice of Application - Re-scheduled Thank you Donna. Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@ysealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:49 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Notice of Application - Re-scheduled Jenny: I put the posting packet in the mail today. Please let me know if you do not receive it by Monday afternoon. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:36 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Notice of Application - Re-scheduled Donna, The last few notices we have had for the County have simply been mailed to us. Can this one be mailed as well? If so, we gladly supply our on posting board and then mail back the affidavit. Let me know if that can be done. Thanks, Jenny Sent on the Sprint®Now Network from my BlackBerry® From: Donna Frostholm <dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:38:21 -0600 To: Jenny Rotsten<Jenny@sealevelbb.com> Subject: Adachi Notice of Application -Re-scheduled Hi Jenny: 1 I want to get the Adachi shoreline appl 'on moving again. I would like to notice tippplication the week of May 9. For this to happen,you would need to b able to: • come in on Tuesday, May 10 to pick the noticing packet and the notice board; • have the notice sign posted on the Adachi property by Wednesday, May 11; and • return the signed and notarized affidavit of posting by Monday, May 16. Please reply to let me know if you or someone else from Sealevel Builders can post the notice that week. LOG ITEM Thanks, vim,Fro thoLvw Page_ g- of p- _Associate PCanner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm @co.jefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 'FERSON COUNTY PERMIT CEA" CASE NO. 6� r�j Ib 'i 1 /MLtf —. LOS: ITEM CERTIFICATION OF MAILING -/ I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this `D4frl day of /L,...,, , 2011,I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed, true and correct copies of AL7t/(4 q / , f ' • in the above matter, addressed to: Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) tliAgencies: See attached list. ❑ Interested Parties: See attached list. 3 Applicant/Representative-Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction, Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. INewspapers(Notices Only) C' Official Posting Places (x3) ❑ Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. EXECUTED this Illday of PA , 2011 at Port Townsend, Washington. fl \I.' /t_I 1.‘ !l U`��i , Declarant G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 2-2011.DOC • • 601032020 LOG ITEM YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE �! YOKO ADACHI TRUST i 19223 34TH AVE S i (t _ SEATAC,WA 981885313 601031008 RICHARD J ALLEN MARILYN V ALLEN PO BOX 10446 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,WA 981100446 701344050 JOHN N KAPP MARY J KAPP 783 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE,WA 983768602 701344016 DAVID J KREIMER VIRGINIA KREIMER 9307 21ST AVE NW SEATTLE,WA 981172708 701344051 MARIANNE B MAC DONALD 975 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE,WA 983769691 601031005 MACKENZIE DESHLER TAD CYNTHIA MACKENZIE DESHLER 533 NE 90TH ST SEATTLE,WA 981152956 601032021 JEFFERY S VINCENT GEORGIA A VINCENT 4584 ROCKAWAY BLUFF RD NE BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,WA 981103708 LOG • LOG IT SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 rt. a t *DOE WETLANDS *WDFW PF; 7,w8 RICK MRAZ MARGIE SCHIRATO �`J PO BOX 47775 414 BUSINESS PARK ROAD OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 SHELTON,WA 98584 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WA STATE DNR *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY JEFF SCHRECK PO BOX 47829 5310 EAGLEMOUNT RD OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7284 CHIMACUM,WA 98325 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 RUSSELL HOLTER PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE inl,p� ei ./ 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD. OLYMPIA,WA 98501 KINGSTON,WA 98346 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW RANDY LUMBER KRIS MILLER 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE *SUQUAMISH TRIBE LEANN JENKINS ALISON O'SULLIVAN rt.o-k-iz5 1033 OLD BLYN HIGHWAY PO BOX 498 b ''''' SEQUIM,WA 98382 SUQUAMISH,WA 98392 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL *US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CYNTIA ROSSI �, 0 CENWS-OD-RG ATTN: JESS JORDAN no-h c 7999 NE SALISH LANE h P 0 BOX 3755 a �� KINGSTON,WA 98346 SEATTLE,WA 98124-3755 ( AY ; p Q Yr&"Y K` }moo 1 '01,-f ri-rAibaq Lev,„ --it ' ,,,Ir- 6A1:46/ v C I.J i I c f-'/I,) Sl ¢ oiv o JEFFERSON 4J►UNTY °�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N' LOG ITEM - 621 Sheridan Street qs, ,SO Port Townsend, WA 98368 LNG 5 ,. May+i, 2011 Al Scalf, Director Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA10-00155 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete, the access area will be re-vegetated. Work,will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. Location: Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 Comments must be received within f 4v41 (3w)calendar days or by Tex lC;.i3 if . If no written response has been received within q,,,, (3c)days,your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Nr8V14-/ r[A-64414—' Donna Frostholm Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 • • LOG ITEM gi c: RICK MRAZ, * DOE WETLANDS MARGIE SCHIRATO, *WDFW JEFF SCHRECK, *WA STATE DNR PO BOX 47829, *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT. - MARK TOY 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106, RUSSELL HOLTER 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD., PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE RANDY LUMBER, *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW KRIS MILLER, *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW LEANN JENKINS, *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE ALISON O'SULLIVAN, *SUQUAMISH TRIBE CYNTIA ROSSI, *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL CENWS-OD-RG ATTN: JESS JORDAN, * US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS • JEFFERSON COUNTY • PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 LOG ITEM APPLICANT: , j ... SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE ,Y "- YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14,2010 Application Notice Date: May 11, 2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete, the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on June 10, 2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is exempt from SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled and separate public notice will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court APPEALS: The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court Project Planner. Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.lefferson.wa.uslco mm development! ' N JEFFER OUNTY ITEM 4 1,40.,..., DEPARTMEN f OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT # t e 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 Q 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax fJ .' s� 42)..,„�.,„40 www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Master Permit Application MLA: I 0 "I53 Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Nape- SA-60,6 Ii7.0'tio� , Tax Parcel Number (an t p 2Z c7 2-O Property Size: (o.9 ' (square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 1?-53 bee-v- C.vz ' Property Owner(s)of Record: Ac4[icir rt SkC-.c . Telephone: ?O(4Z- qq-2r.--t-t--t*i Fax: email: back. Mailing Address: iq 7275 34+4 _ s. .Sec t 4 -rcvev--a6 I Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): &t 4tuel, .r.1 kLC. 1411,Ct td-e..v • Telephone: SloO-jct -- 2-4CM 2--k Fax: 3Ao0-act�-2.30% email: 5eckAr(t 1.,6c-a i t ve r li vtK. Mailing Address: '. 4,e ■_fit,_ v A- it34� At- What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building 14 Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage industry ❑Binding Site Plan-* ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate /UK1 (�Lt/ cad ia 5 to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE .h.$L�_ ill Xi:kJ Date: i/2-4/2-01 ) By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the o :t tfi ' « tion packet may result in this permit being null and void. .e. k ,11--i 114.1" ii ;, _ - I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. 7 ntts>, I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or or,the:`sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staff's access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the ape- on that he or she wants prior notice. i Signature: L// a. ✓ I G FA t j The action or- ions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans - -ble responsibility for-;herin•to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: 1 4/ 0,1:i - iJv Date: t/2j/(( G:\PemvtCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • BUILDER STATEMENT • The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be /assur ing the responsibility of the general Contractor for the proposed project.. Signature: i. _ _ Ai, '6 i Date: 1 1 214/"W j 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR 'ANUFIRGTt1RED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: -\ ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: �y EMAIL: 5�` CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE J WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: O New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer O Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: 0 Individual System O Repair 0 Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: 0 Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: I Underground Tank I Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove I Fireplace Insert i Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying fora permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, includin. the reserve area. _ Square Footage Current Proposed a49 Y ..E. - s 4$ Main Floor Heated "i EH Bid App Review: 2""Floor Heated ;, ry° Consistency Review: Other Heated `f -7 Base fee: Mezzanine W— Additional Section: Heated Basement eg Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated 4' Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport ' :rif :' SUBTOTAL Decks 4-1 911/Rd Approach fee: Other '; TOTAL::..$ Receipt Number: - Cmh/Check Number: �u . ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: #air market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish -,ni,,:y 4,,i ,i 71,, n 0(01; Initials',,,. -• 4t (j°; G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DIED FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • "'�` AGENCY U L 1 1 L •° 2010 ` • Date received: T " WASHINGTON STATE US Army C0 of Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form' Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BELOW. Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help)2 Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2—Applicant The person or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last,First,Middle)and Organization(if applicable) Yoko Adachi 2b. Mailing Address(Street or PO Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2c. City, State, Zip Seatac, WA 98188-2313 2d. Phone(1) 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2g. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi©comcast.net Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b. of this application.) [help] 3a. Name (Last,First,Middle) and Organization (if applicable) Rotsten, Jennifer—Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 375 Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage_ESA l�1 ����. t~ • If you are applying for an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization you will need to fill out and submit an 16 Ali q or' t rihtir . JUs State- Owned Aquatic Lands form to DNR,which can be found at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/agruse_auth_app.doc • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you think you will need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they will accept the JARPA. all 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to JAN' t!'; c 's http://www.epermitting.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/jarpajarpa_form/9984/jarpa_form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help @ora.wa.gov. is i ls ' s' `3 . S a JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 5,l �z Page 1 of 14 • • LOG ITEM 3c. City, State, Zip Kingston,WA 98346 - - ._ 3d. Phone(1) 3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3g. E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 sealevelbb @silverlink.net Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. [help] ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle)and Organization (if applicable) 4b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4c. City, State, Zip _4d. Phone(1) 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4g. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [hem ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] Q State Owned Aquatic Land (If yes or maybe,contact the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)at(360)902-1100) (1 Federal ❑ Other publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools, ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ® Private 5b. Street Address(Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 1253 Deer Creek Rd. 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene,WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 7414r Page 2 of 14 • 5e. Provide the section,township, and range for the project location. [help] Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [helpi LOG ITEM • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long.(NAD 83) O(� 47 46'48.09" N 1 122 47'30.72"W Page__ I t✓-, Cif 3 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. thelp] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) Jeffery & Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Alan &Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish,WA 98290 51. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] N/A 5j. List all waterbodies(other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] Deciduous &evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos enclosed. 1 I�, JARPA 2010 vi 3/30/2010 Page 3 of 14 • • LOG ITEM 021 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [help] SFR . �-- 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. IheiDi SFR 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s). [hem Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] From Hwy 104, turn onto S Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd, follow for 8.5 miles, turn left onto Coyle Rd, and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road all the way to the water. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 4 of 14 • S Part 6—Project Description 6a. Summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6d. [help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. Approximately+/-25 yards of 1-2 man rock, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill, +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock, and 30 yards of crushed rock will be installed. Geo-grid will be installed, spacing as per plans, ached plans ii prepared by Aspect Consulting. L 1 i 6b. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial El Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6c. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float [1 Road Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Marina/ Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Piling ❑ Utility Line ❑ Buoy (I Ferry Terminal ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway (upland) ❑ Other: 6d. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. [help] • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain. As shown on the plans, the slope will be cleaned of all organics; logs and root wads will be salvaged and used along the toe of the MRE wall when completed. Loose material will be removed from the slide area.The new toe will be excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions. Layer specified geo-grid and compact material as directed by geo-tech. The rock armor on the top of the slope will be placed along a >1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5'where<1:1, 1-2 man size rock may be used. The construction road will be created for access and left intact when work is complete. Drainage will be installed as needed based on engineer and/or agency requirements based on conditions. The access area will be re-vegetated once work is complete. Bare surfaces will be covered with temporary erosion control and native plantings completed for permanent erosion control along access, new reinforced slope, and mitigation/monitoring area. See plans and GASP for more details. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction? month/ ear [help] Y ) [ ] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: Spring 2011 End date: +/-14 day duration ❑ See JARPA Attachment D =ada JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 5 of 14 • • 6f. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. (help] A slide that occurred at the site during the winter of 2007-2008 removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The proposed work will restore and stabilize the slide area and prevent future slope instability. LOG ITEM 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $100,000.00 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help] • If yes, list each agency providing funds. Lj Yes El No ❑ Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation n Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If yes, submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. R54 E I[ - 111 Yes ❑ No )1 A / 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] JAN 2 7 2111 • If yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know €- �� JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 6 of 14 • • 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] • If yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. (I Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable LOG Gt./ 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [help] 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted;the extent and duration of the impact; and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below)where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain,excavate, Name1 type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq.ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3lndicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. 4 Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h., describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [help] JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 7 of 14 • • 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h., describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] LOG ITEM Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help ❑ Not applicable All work will be completed above the OHW line. Any work near the shoreline that requires access or close proximity to the shoreline will be completed at low tides. The proposed re-vegetation of the slope will enhance the habitat at the site. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help ®Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help) • If yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable Please review submitted CASP for mitigation and monitoring. , , t „I;, N 2 7 2011 1-1 FEI ' N lt'Li JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 ' ' + ' Page 8 of 14 • • 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g.,you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] > ITEM LOG Please review submitted GASP � 1 _3 3 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity(clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 impact3 to be placed in or linear ft.) of drive, etc.) removed from waterbody waterbody directly affected FILL:1-2 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW FILL: Geogrid fill Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-1017 yards landward of OHW FILL: 2-3 Man Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-25 yards rock landward of OHW FILL: Crushed Dabob Bay Adjacent; Permanent None +/-30 yards rock landward of OHW — _ I no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided 2lndicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3lndicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e., describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [help] Fill will consist of: +/- 25 yards of 1-2 man rock +/-25 yards of 2-3 man rock +/-1017 yards of geo-grid fill, to be compacted to min 95% maximum of proctor std ASTM D-698/Source unknown at this time. +/-30 yards of crushed gravel for access road 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e., describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 A • Page 9 of 14 • • N/A LOG ITEM C 9 3. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 Dec 2010 Department of Ecology Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [help] • If yes, list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.goy/proorams/wci/303d/. ❑ Yes EA No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.00v/surf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (VVRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.gov/services/qis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wo/swos/criteria.html for the standards. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 10 of 14 • • LeiG- ITEM ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable ` a 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is tea&ai shoreline environment designation? [help] °' • If you don't know, contact the local planning department. • For more information, go to: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban n Natural n Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertvping.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial n Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If no,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ®Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] SFR 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ❑Yes ® No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Salmon, bald eagle 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] 7 2011 JARPA 2010v1 3/30/2010 of 14 • • • Unknown LOG ITEM it Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or helpn,ora.wa.gov. • For a list of agency addresses to send your application, click on the "where to send your completed JARPA" at http://www.epermitting.wa.gov. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply.) ihelpl • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. , Fl A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 12 of 14 • • ® A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson County (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.) [help] ❑This project is exempt(choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code(WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: LOG I i E_s v i ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. a c - 77- ' - r 1 Ob. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [help] LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: E Substantial Development n Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: El Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Resources Use Authorization FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [help} 11 a. Applicant Signature (required) [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 13 of 14 • • Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. LUG ' grr Pik° .. 3 11a. Applicant Signature (required) (hem I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoriz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. �-_- (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. � (initial) Applicant Da e JL�Kht i�c c\nt 11b. Authorized Agent Signature IheliA I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is trice, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authoriz-• ••ent Date 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [help} I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA). People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 4 ■ • • .41,t0.6200130‘it OtOn4F14.41.4.4f,44=20,1.41.4.4040 8 4 1 a 1 ia OG ',5-'-",,, L 11 t.::,. , l'i I li -- --- - ----- z ,) . I • 5 iw i a 0 2 i N. 02 3 g g - '40 t 2 a -us h M tia o 2 g 1 94kb P-r= u-.14 1 411i 0. fr 1 l'aji ft '6,1 I ltit w 31 1 U (7)4 00='.•''' S -,1 I .... 4111 i il I F i i 11 /1, ithl o-- eg 1 • '4;11 ' i II I R 2 u' '-'1,1 olt 1— 11 0. . i 1, 1 h4 i- ,r, 11111 M i 1 11 ., k:..3 ii I ftlh1141 tp! Till b h i I k, q ',0., 1 Ile gile 2 i I c 0 1 ii II 4 8 R 8 8 V ,SS Oil 011.04i, I \\ i .l I 11 i t t I. •.' • ti i A ------, ' ' , ) ---- '-\ - - \--", ---7 r, ,I fl - !Hit PI!' 1 illityl t , I I 11 i I o I A 1121 il 11 111 it 1 II h i. li = F. o , kit 2 I Itti V . --___ --, ' , 1 0 _,-,4 ,-,,,,. z i r ,f 4) 1 ii I i \ it 0111 im 0_ it 2 1 -/ / ,i4 - , : $ . di pi e = • / :,,,..::-:..,. . .,... . . , 1 . , b h 4 4'f ..*:',1'...*1:-,";:.•:-` 11 H ,' . •-.',.; •,'Ye,,-1 z I 1 /., •-::.Z4§ .i:::', , n, `'-,, --4ONZY, 1 : al 2.• 7 bil \, _ ' 414 All z 0 P ea S ■ viiii_..4,4,„--0.157---- kkil it \ 1101 I i : Mil \ INN 'lig :i , 1 Pm Igi lid ; A 0- ! Oil -- , it w. 1 -i 11 L I. fik 24 14 11 a pl. IN • .t.,-',if 111 l'? . I \ _--- ; 1 ij - ,21 ---1,,--.V.2ar.1- . 2Eg.a s A '*E r .. O 1 2 4' MI i 3 1 2 C :5'1 6:i1 1 '214 1." . f- : 17. 113 !la, 2 4':•1 O :4 21 Z Z 15 i; § 1 4 lit ila.i ! r,fe a a 2 .. a, ist grnr. :i tv= I ' '' g 1 11 f U Ill A-, . m .. .4-. LA Ml t il t ,,t: m gq Vigil it =if E gi g ,i; w gil 61,11; 1.1 fig 0 ., .4 .4 . .. .4 ., .., . 0 ' (5 ' ' . ■ 1 • • , o r, o d- Z W p a ZO 5 3 3 ° 3 \ � CNO c N : > - 0 0 v- cv 0... 1-1-1 (/)",- o" S ,. m m ^ ^ ^ o W o Z U1 I— W LOt TES (Ml - N9Z -c b/l3N) G 101 1,n00 ' o / ) ° ,'='m- /DEER ---"' 'N w n > o 06 Ox..w ry O O Z O N p�00 �MN~O Ul t- Z� Z . N Z u C.2,Th 0 J J W Z "' I N� O~ O+ 0 0 0^, "� O I'' w �>°m'o o �e�Inn o^w • ,n ox¢ d7 0 V N ■ ../) NO OM N 7,, g e r I -r,--'2 LOG __ O O ry OOj^ 00 NN _xnI , o OOV LOG ITE1 0 0 0- M °W . tO U In o ol ° o p al o` mrry V O>t¢-0yty� �'Y��[ p>m^ 0,OmM oo" 0>,0° ~F'i �UJ'rv'�'; VII W ix. ¢ Er o D C3 COO Vl iD U r M ,y. q � � ,3 Z U es� _ / U n OIL` ry N O w / ; U 1=-:,,,,4 3 i° r N wry I A "' w / El b z n / T. <i-, / 'y / °mPoDp �_ `r r d . u i d n Vo, L —(4.,� ^ C 2 O pry//� e. mr° °x °; m e. O ,/ O b Q N / / I , N U O ¢N U Q N N / / i / v I • / ¢ In U - I Qrn (Mt - N9Z - b b/t3N) 9' via: '?: "E ? fR to s3 y 3 o#o v j_ ? ° N .. o „ I, m sl o cd-`Y o y +K: Q --^ r. t'9- W! x >3 iH - per, r `m _ v; J ?-g!-,±W i \{ o N rc fi S el, tt' cO SL m Zo : S b V ry _ ?oo g u 40 Z oWFi.i= ryI: .: N f-U O N - u- 3l �.�; V a w - _rc W a fi • • W co w 1 ( ¢ 10 ., LI _ L N 1 i I.., , D W a. L ,.t Y3 3—r �1 5 7. m 0 f}�Z�j Ln W Z ¢. 1 N d W u j D n >. Ir a 7 ° Z ¢ O W u .._ ..a.v. 3 0 ° J o am¢ ui ama Q -• m ©0)O 2 N¢ LA Z a ....._y..r '�. '7J n m 1 3 aO.p . ,r ¢N m w D --tl = cE o m Lo 0¢¢ ¢w L.,'O W W a Y a a ¢ ai a ¢ I-- 0 O w<a m a_ — o, ,z° w z U¢U a j<ti";oo' dd .. r*, o g 1A 2 ct: '--; " .;•.t.,,:,-"?..' Ait:-.),a4 ... ,.,.,.... c .o Ilie aiW + O O� , b,kn, Z �� „W 0 ID Zui ari .^VA L. ' :i ha r o �oo �o Z. CleP.. . : i_W 4 <„ oR ,'::`i•:::;:.,.:, r-•;,..:,,,: Z 112! ' oh �� Ai'a =a le AM ti ', p; . 1111111 r"74,-,::-----7,;-‘• = a ° >�Ai'1, '< C CEt3ii11 t�6 , �' � 61 0 .6: rY W6 1� �� U E ti �� a! °tip wv1u,t �1 IRv '4 ,.iti .wFlIIII I o .6i�= .1� ° ioF 1,', 9440 LL..a°r_ lilt row d �OOF j(��y7]]�' Ii 0.0 WO = : 'III �. :: —� 1174 � O •. z yet LL `,i u1Wy� 3 I r�-7111 r W on 11 ,� Kad id„, Z 6W p w y v AL 4) u E .:. . car 741 �-lkiUlArkr 05,, N ” o :in ���' 9'0 m Na rn a .' _v C n C N o� -v m I. N rn ' P::.Oil -7..ti: , -,:::77":. ''''t 7-4 J yo@ NW »��-as '� Q F-70—a Eo� II x r �����69 '��IP :. to M tl� - ;Q _ 41. a 1, G 6- '2 _ "'°',-5, .=F —®�1,.�'`�. ,:: San I' " 4 acK Je • JEFFERSON COUNTY • PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 APPLICANT: SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE �! a jy 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 - '`'�=.�:.. Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: May 11, 2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete, the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on June 10, 2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is exempt from SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled and separate public notice will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. APPEALS: The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ • • Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 LOG II T p, POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by May 11, 2011. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE •IDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE • LOG a— . JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE �1 ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 �j State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one (1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete,the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of , 2011. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2011. Acknowledgement Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in , Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE I:\F_MLT_NtcApp30_APO_U.rpt • • Donna Frostholm From: Legals Email [legals @ptleader.comj Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:36 PM To: Donna Frostholm LOS , Subject: Re: publish MLA10-00155NOA on May 11, 2011 -legal 1._�+�I C9-I Donna, i Your legal ad request has been received and your ad(s) will publish on the date(s) stated in your email. We are setting the referenced ad today for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the ad is actually published and measured. Our estimates will give you a figure close to the actual cost. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the ad is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of your legal ad. Thank you and have a great day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 on 5/5/11 10:15 AM, Donna Frostholm at dfrostholm©co.jefferson.wa.us wrote: Hello Legals: Please publish the attached file one time in the Wednesday, May 11, 2011 edition of The Leader. Please reply to confirm that you have received this email and will publish the attached file on the date indicated above. Thanks, Dcrywta,f ra tho1lrw .Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend Washington 98368 dfrosthofm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday; DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 • • Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: May 11, 2011 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account Number 15833 LOG IrE:rvl JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10 00155 4 Y9stl LOW APPLICANT: SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE SEATAC,WA 981885313 Application Received Date:April 21,2010 Application Complete Date:June 14,2010 Application Notice Date:May 11,2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION:1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020,Section 3,Township 26N,Range 1W,WM,located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd,Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete,the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope;access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting,the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application;(b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368,(360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m.on June 10,2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday,then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. Project Planner:Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information,please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment! Please publish one time. PUIPSH DATE: May 11, 2011 • BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 APPLICANT: I �_..# SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE ' _ YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE � 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: May 11, 2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete, the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on June 10, 2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ • JEFFERSON COUNTY • PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE HI LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 APPLICANT: SEIICHI ADACHI Lrlr I YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 02, 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14,2010 Application Notice Date: May 11, 2011 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete, the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on June 10, 2011. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is exempt from SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled and separate public notice will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court APPEALS: The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court Project Planner. Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevel opment/ 4AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE • ;w: j-._. ,.,,x . JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE �yy I---I � ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 L of State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I ,iiviS , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one (1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of existing house near steep slope along Dabob Bay. Slope stabilization work includes installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material will be layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads will be salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction is complete,the access area will be re-vegetated. Work will be conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area will not be from Dabob Bay. All work to stabilize the slope and protect the existing home will be completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the 6114- day of ' ,2011. _i%/ d«si ./Pr LTV (S.•na re of pe on posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of 2011. Acknowledgement: 1 • `� — •'ate of Washington,�on, Vic. o pZAR y '": rrn Notar, Pu in !!+_g.rth 4: a g Q U �A r- ring in , Washington. PUB���' My commission expires: l ��. , . 0;2. NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): SEIICHI ADACHI TRUSTEE I:\F_MLT_NtcApp30_APO_U.rpt 110E0EINED fl\ i�AY 12 MI L JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Donna Frostholm LO ' 'Tm From: Donna Frostholm ,� Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:41 PM n _ j' �r-� To: 'Jenny Rotsten'; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato Cc: John L. Peterson Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: Please send a revised site plan showing the location and the extent of the bulkhead that is proposed. I will get back to you after I have had a chance to look at the revised site plan. Thanks. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent:Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:29 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato Cc: John L. Peterson Subject: Adachi Donna and Margie, We are getting work going at the Adachi site and have found that the shoreline has eroded quite considerably. We have had the engineer for the project, John Peterson, out to the site to review the changes in condition. He is preparing a changed plan to work with the change in conditions on the site.The toe of the slope has eroded back such that the slide debris is no longer providing the ledge that was in place. Due to that,the engineer is recommending a bulkhead be built at the base of the slope to protect the reinforced wall from wave action and erosion. Is there anything further you will need besides a revised plan from the engineer for this to proceed? Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston,WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.comj Page Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:04 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato Subject: Fw: Adachi This message's attachments have been at by the Barracuda Message Archiver, (230.5K) (1/0.5K) Donna and Margie, Attached is the design change for Adachi. Please advise with any questions. Unless you have any concerns about this change,we would like to proceed with the work. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: John L. Peterson Sent:Thursday,July 14, 2011 8:57 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi At Haley's request here are the items again John L. Peterson, P.E. I Aspect Consulting LLC I Direct 206.780.7720 From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 13, 2011 2:19 PM To: John L. Peterson Subject: Adachi Hi John. Have you completed the Adachi plans? Thanks, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 • et LO _ iTE vj ' (360) 297-2308 Fax _ (-/ Jenny @sealevelbb.com Page e__ r Please note new email address . 2 • • • Aspect LOG ITEM CONSULTING _� . 4. _ July 13,2011 , � The Estate of Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject Design Change for West-Facing MRE Toe Wall 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove,Washington Project No.080029-001-03 References: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT,Landslide Remediation-Adachi Property, 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report,Dated October 27,2008, 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,Design of Slope Buttress, • dated March 5,2010,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Executors of the Estate: At the request of your contractor,Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Aspect Consulting met with Craig and Jason at the site on July 5,2011.The initial access road had been roughed into the base of the slope.We observed,after the toe area was somewhat cleared,that the topography at the shoreline had be severely eroded by the past winter storms.Without the protection of the already planned improvements,in-place,the OHW had moved 10 to 13 feet shoreward.There is no room to move the buttress further away from the shoreline and maintain the design function.Therefore,the face of the MRE must change to be more protective for the MRE.A rock face integrated into the MRE would withstand the approaching wave action. Still,the shoreward area would need to be rebuilt with sand and logs to maintain a sand beach as already planned. A design sketch of this new face section is attached as Figure A.This section would be needed along the west-facing zone of the wall from the north end of the turn to about 40 feet south.At that point,the original wall face would be sufficiently far away from the OHW,as not to need the additional rock. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you.If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspect consulting, LLC L•PE�'E. OFD A sy to • 4 , _,„,„ .- I ; �o , 802 -7//3"/ .G00 GisT John L.Peterson,PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson@aspectconsulting.com Attachment: Figure A-Rock Face MRE Wall cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders(via Email) W:\_GEOTECIE080029 Adachi LandslidelDeliverables\July Wall Change.doc —1— Aspect Consulting,LLC 179 Madrone Lane N Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 206 780 9370 www.aspectconsulting corn • . • . . Date: & / 4 fs//Project > Q g D a a 9 Page:j...af—I-- ASpet consulting rt h+water Project: ii-nD a c / S/ 7•o,7ee_.7i y Subject: Co#k c e 441f.F /dw/l 1l ini! t Iq3 •l O • • • .. • o • • •: • : :-.. ••"'",. • ..'::. ;"1: ;;.'' ''': : :.. ;';'. ' . :;;• --;.... D! '•••'.- -•":••••"''';•;•SO••••••;f•-•'''.•• •••''..- ;•;;;;',-;;;;.;;;;-;';;;;;;;;;' I r. ..-. • • • 1 . . Ii_ '1 _ .. .. .. • -:: : :::::::::•::"T : ": ; : : : :: : ; : .: ' E. ..: : i ; :. '. : '; : : -:. : : :0 ; , ': - '.: 1 1...0 '' ..E..A.„.J. ', , ,• ••J.d.,..... •:. , :-. J : .i. . ':. '.: ••• • : h ! " • • Donna Frosthoim From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] LOG ITEM Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:20 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Page / of Thank you Donna. We will pick up and pay in person on Monday! Sent on the Sprint* Now Network from my BlackBerry® From: Donna Frosthoim<dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:10:54 -0600 To: Jenny Rotsten<Jenny @sealevelbb.com>; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato<Margaret.BigelowSchirato @dfw.wa.gov> Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: This would require a modification to the emergency shoreline exemption that was issued March 23. The cost will be $142 to modify the permit. You can either pre-pay the$142 fee and JC will send out the revised permit after we receive the check,or you can come in and pick up the permit(and pay the fee at the time you pick it up). The soonest the revised permit could be issued is next week, and work should not begin until the revised emergency permit is issued. Also,the shoreline substantial development application will need to be re-noticed (and the applicants will be billed for the costs of re-noticing)to include the bulkhead. I will contact you at a later date to schedule the re-noticing. Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent:Thursday, July 14, 2011 10:04 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato Subject: Fw: Adachi Donna and Margie, Attached is the design change for Adachi. Please advise with any questions. Unless you have any concerns about this change, we would like to proceed with the work. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax 1 Jenny@sealevelbb.com • 4� � IT5 "° Please note new email address From: John L. Peterson Sent: Thursday,July 14, 2011 8:57 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi At Haley's request here are the items again John L. Peterson, P.E. i Aspect Consulting LLC I Direct 206.780.7720 From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:19 PM To: John L. Peterson Subject: Adachi Hi John. Have you completed the Adachi plans? Thanks, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 2 Donna Frostholm • • From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:19 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Amy Leitman; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato; John L. Pee �T Subject: Adachi Attachments: IMG_0078.JPG; IMG_0081.JPG Of Donna, We have completed the work at the Adachi site. Right now we are waiting on this hot weather this week to pass and then install the plants next week. What do you need, if anything, from the biologists or engineers? Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 6 s . rt d s aa ^ # rte e ,� �e x , .. , ._ pageLO_LITEfU:11.... ..., •44 a- d .s r F. a ]�' as -, 9K ;.a Al.p ads .Y` N ' �► fs a } r f4,i $ allir '']s; u = Y s . r •e: 7 • _,gyp .a + z y - . . K • . ..tea ..a-e yy � b4- y _ ''',., mar. 46- , ,f :•- ^x., 1, s.' ''Ci sy x 1, " 477; y } 0. E *‘ 5 „ .t =c .r. r t. t_4-7,—;� '":,i $, r' '!°�,,,.,•,.;„I r"*".'",,..; rs'v "�".,".',4;fi . -.r: ca- - .rte'- . ,-...., - 1- - - ° 1 5 1 �.. —'4 .. 5 , --C T ,. ilis ,--- ..._ � rem .Z ti .''+� Y_ - ,y 1;:'01'.-'..' y" ..i belt >. dot k it. 4 a .fi x. .4i t 1.; is 3 ,. m K'"y t.(� 3 '4 1",k,.9 t i� rk. , max` 47'4 t.,"i My' if re 4;, . .` P it r. .px .'iC-. tf. .. ' rr ; 'ta' • M M t 4 y , R a �11. ♦� i:., ayr `e a+'t* A . 1 i M T A ` & .f' L t LOG 9 TEM 1 ` Page of , r a .� f ^t 4, y W °� *4 X • • David W. Johnson From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:50 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Cc: Amy Leitman; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato; John L. Petee0, DiariM Johnson Subject: RE: Adachi Jenny: The biologist will need to revise the CASP to address the additional work from the last emergency shoreline exemption. This project has been transferred to David Johnson, another planner here at DCD. The application will need to be re- noticed to address the work completed as part of the last emergency shoreline exemption. David will contact you about re-noticing. Once MSA has revised the CASP to address the bulkhead, please submit that to my attention. Other correspondence about the application should go to David Johnson. Thanks, Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny@sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:19 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Amy Leitman; Margaret M (DFW) Bigelow Schirato; John L. Peterson Subject: Adachi Donna, We have completed the work at the Adachi site. Right now we are waiting on this hot weather this week to pass and then install the plants next week. What do you need, if anything, from the biologists or engineers? Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 • S David W. Johnson From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24 PM To: David W. Johnson LOG ITEM Subject: FW: Adachi David: Page / of For the Adachi file... From: Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW) [mailto:Margaret.BigelowSchirato @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 12:43 PM To: Jenny Rotsten; Donna Frostholm Cc: John L. Peterson Subject: RE: Adachi Send me the new updated plans and I can reissue the HPA From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:29 PM To: Donna Frostholm; Bigelow Schirato, Margaret M (DFW) Cc: John L. Peterson Subject: Adachi Donna and Margie, We are getting work going at the Adachi site and have found that the shoreline has eroded quite considerably. We have had the engineer for the project,John Peterson, out to the site to review the changes in condition. He is preparing a changed plan to work with the change in conditions on the site. The toe of the slope has eroded back such that the slide debris is no longer providing the ledge that was in place. Due to that,the engineer is recommending a bulkhead be built at the base of the slope to protect the reinforced wall from wave action and erosion. Is there anything further you will need besides a revised plan from the engineer for this to proceed? Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jennv@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 • 0 Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:15 PM To: David W. Johnson; Donna Frostholm Cc: Bill Matthews LOG ITEM Subject: Fw: adachi _______ ___q____ Attachments: Adachi 080029 as built.pdf # ID a xe___- -__-_o _ Donna and Dave, We just were sent this as built for the Adachi job. All of the plantings have been completed. Please let me know if you need anything else right now. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: John L. Peterson Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:49 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: adachi Jenny, Attached is pdf of revised drawing. A full size original is being mailed to you today Please note our new address John L. Peterson, P.E. I Direct 206.780.7720 I Cell 206.719.8278 I laeterson @asoectconsulting.com Aspect Consulting LLC 1350 Madison Ave N, Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 I Fax: 206.780.9438 I www.aspectconsultinq.com 1 • I, • .... 2x: LOG ITEM r\ 4# , i \ Page_ (9, of_A i : I 46 S I 3 is,%E 1 i 41. IP I < i ••I s 2 I 1 a 141 I 41 r I g 611 . ril AO i ! 1 it = ::- 1 j li I I: NI hi p 1 iing i il `-t 11 -, 1---- 11 !,.; V I 11 I 1 1 1. Pk, H i . ith a i I' r ill ,or S i d- 3 11: U 10\''\/ ) Iih i / ith ii il 1 Id til 1111 0... .. i \ i i i i IV k nt 6 \ U 111 \, 1.• 1 8 \ ; ,\ • g \g it h \ , I 4 51228 e 22 2 . II/2228 ilFd 2 ° 0 u 1 g 01- lib Zi. I 1 1 3111 e I_ 1.1 it (41110:r = --.. i I \ b IIII■ i \ i . \ i Illi II i \ : ot .in li 1 .4 t I I IL 1 I l• SON. 0 11. Iii FP 4 I I '! • I 11 I 1 i 1-li 1 II - i x Ii Pi I t 1 II t ii lig p S ill . e 4 I a A . i AI 11 i 1 4 1= a.,. - g . \ if § Ap h In § a R 1 I..7-R t, t 4 t i I I t g 11 II I I ii 1 I i \ i \, ‘\rjr" 21 hi!1 1112 L .1 1 I\ ) \ 111 1111 I r., p , H.1 'II li lig z l 0 V" i lis \ /0 ,h 4_ 1' ir it 1 e ,i , N i . --_____ li ALVA / 1 1,1 I ' - -----i ---, ' 1 iii( i / ;4, ilit 1 al / 17?,/ i ;(---.,\ } a.gi 24 i / ,, I i g, i II il •-,‘; U ;Jr' i hi bthie 1 \---- . i is . \ i r \ 1 ' i 1 5 .. _ , VotPficw Al* 1 . , .,.4?..v .t:.\t+4' I i ' 3- 2 .3•-- 7, 3 f 1 1 , g , 11 ala 1 K p 1,1**1 Ati, 1 _ , ,,,.:, g g 2 2 I I 7. 'I ;411111r.. ) ,_ 2 1 - * 4 9 't 0 5if viz 4r 0 ( I . g - tA 1 <1! ,., li \ 0 ' z z I. .d , 1 0 ; § . ,1 aikt i ill 11 14 O. h il 11 14 g i -,.f. -i ii- . . , 4 =§ gg di )5 P g 1 ig af.= . -a ii-8 tu i 1 - a. a. fl§ i t- ft I 'as ,'" -'' it 3' gg g At g fii 8.11 1 11., 11 ': . i ''''`‘-,, - • • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] LOG ITEM Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:54 PM To: David W. Johnson Cc: Donna Frostholm pa mss: _.� �. Subject: Re: adachi T Dave, Hard copies are in the mail to us and I will forward them to you. The CASP was awaiting this as built to be finalized I believe. I will confirm with Marine Surveys and Assessments. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: David W. Johnson Sent:Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:35 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: adachi Has the CASP been revised to show the work done? If so, please forward it to Donna. Thanks! From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:15 PM To: David W.Johnson; Donna Frostholm Cc: Bill Matthews Subject: Fw: adachi Donna and Dave, We just were sent this as built for the Adachi job. All of the plantings have been completed. Please let me know if you need anything else right now. Best regards, 1 • S Jenny Rotsten LOG ITEM Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc 4 PO Box 375 , �, Kingston,WA 98346 g (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: John L. Peterson Sent:Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:49 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: adachi Jenny, Attached is pdf of revised drawing. A full size original is being mailed to you today Please note our new address John L. Peterson, P.E. I Direct 206.780.7720 1 Cell 206.719.8278 1 Peeterson@aspectconsultino.com Aspect Consulting LLC 1350 Madison Ave N, Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 1 Fax: 206.780.9438 1 www.aspectconsulting.com 2 • • LOG ITEM Pace_ cif Landslide Remediation Adachi Property brAk cal Area Stewardship Plan Addendum January 20, 2012 For: The Estate of Derek Adachi 19223 34th Ave. South Seatac, WA 98188 • Prepared by: Marine Surveys a Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: (360)385-4073 Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Table of Contents of 1.0. Site Location and Project Summary 3 2.0.Species of Interest Within the Critical Area 4 3.0. Project Impacts 7 4.0. Mitigation Measures 8 References 9-10 Figures 1. Project Location 11 2. As-Built Site Plan 12 3. Original MRE Wall Section 13 4. Revised MRE Wall Section 14 5. Original Reinforced Earth Buttress 15 Attachment Aspect Consulting Design Change for West-Facing MRE Toe Wall .16 MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 2 Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum 1.0. SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT SUMMARY 1.1. Introduction The Adachi site is located at 1253 Deer Creek Road in T26N,RO1W,NW'A of Sec 3,on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula overlooking Dabob Bay(Figure 1). 1.2 Project Summary As discussed in the Landside Remediation Critical Area Stewardship Plan for the Adachi Property,dated January 13,2011,extensive slope stabilization was required at the Adachi properly due to landslide activity within the buffer area.Once the actual work began,changes in the site conditions were noted as described below and in Attachment 1: At the request of your contractor,Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Aspect Consulting meet with Craig and Jason at the site on July 5,2011.The initial access road had been roughed into the base of the slope.We observed,after the toe area was somewhat cleared,the topography at the shoreline had been severely eroded by the past winter storms. Without the protection of the already planned improvements,in place,the OHW had moved 10 to 13 feet shoreward.There is no room to move the buttress further away from the shoreline and maintain the design function.Therefore,the face of the MRE must change to be more protective of the MRE.A rock face integrated in the MRE would withstand the approaching wave action. Still the shoreward area would need to be rebuilt with sand and logs to maintain a sand beach as already planned. A design sketch of the new face section is attached as Figure A(seen as Figure 4 below).This section would be needed along the west-facing zone of the wall from the north end of the turn to about 40 feet south.At that point,the original wall face would be sufficiently far away from the OHW,as not to need the additional rock. This additional work was conducted during mid July,2011 and took approximately one week to complete.An excavator was used on the beach at low tides to remove material for the footing of the bulkhead to be constructed with the base rocks(Figure 4).Once the base rocks were installed,reinforced earth was placed behind the rocks at the recommended 1'spacing.The bulkhead was constructed to fmished height as per the engineers' recommendations.The beach substrate obtained from the excavated footings(approximately 50 cubic yards)was spread evenly seaward of the bulkhead as mitigation for the placement of the bulkhead. 1.3. Goals and Objectives As discussed in the original CASP for this project(dated January 13,2011),the goal of the original plan was to safeguard the existing buffer through stabilization and re-planting,and to extend it beyond pre-slide conditions,thus protecting the critical area.Through earth reinforcement,the slope that acts as a buffer has effectively been extended.The proposed planting plan and subsequent maintenance protocol will act to increase the ratio of native to invasive plants,as well as ultimately benefiting the critical area through improved function of the buffer zone. The role and objective of the subsequently added bulkhead is to increase protection of the face of the mechanically reinforced earth(MRE)slope buttress.This will insure the maintenance of the original design functions,which includes the stabilized slope and the added native vegetation. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 3 " X11 2.0. Species of interest withirlee Critical Area The Adachi property is located in Dabob Bay,which is considered a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA)because there are many species that are listed under the Endangered Species Act that are,or could be, present in the waters adjacent to the project site. In the project area,there are two salmon species,Hood Canal summer-run chum(Oncorhynchus keta)and Puget Sound chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha),listed under the Endangered Species Act as threatened species according to the National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)(Federal Register,Vol.64,Nos. 56 and 57). On May 11,2007.NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead(Oncorhynchus mykiss)as a threatened species under the ESA(Federal Register/Vol.72,No.91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations).Bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus)were listed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)in October of 1999. On April 27,2010,NOAA listed the distinct population segments(DPSs)of yelloweye and canary rockfish as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act(ESA)and listed the Georgia Basin DPS of bocaccio as endangered(Federal RegisterNol.75,No.81,April 28,2010,Final Rule).The Georgia Basin refers to all of Puget Sound,including the area around the San Juan Islands,and the Strait of Georgia north to the mouth of the Campbell River in British Columbia.The western boundary of the Georgia Basin runs from east of Port Angeles to Victoria in the Strait of Juan de Fuca. On September 2,2005,NMFS issued the fmal rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant Units(ESUs)of West Coast salmon, including the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU and the Hood Canal Summer-run Chum ESU.The project site is in the designated area for the Puget Sound Chinook and Hood Canal Summer-run ESUs(Federal Register,Vol 70,No.170,Friday, September 2,2005 Rules and Regulations). On November 15,2005 NMFS listed the Southern Resident killer whale(Orcinus orca)as endangered under ESA (Federal Register,Vol.70,No.222,November 18,2005/Rules and Regulations).NOAA Fisheries has designated critical habitat for killer whales(Federal Register/Vol. 71,No.229/November 29,2006/Final Rule). "Critical habitat includes waters deeper than 20'relative to a contiguous shoreline delimited by the line of extreme high water."There have been no confirmed sightings of Southern Resident killer whales in Hood Canal or the Dabob Bay area.The project site is not located in an area designated as critical habitat for the Southern Resident killer whales. The project site is on a shoreline designated as critical habitat for Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout(Federal Register, Vol. 70,No. 185/September 26,2005/Rules and Regulations). NMFS also listed the Steller sea lion(Eumetopias jubatus)as threatened and both the humpback whale(Megaptera novaeangliae)and the Pacific leatherback turtle(Dermochelys coriacea)as endangered species that may occur in Puget Sound. Marbled murrelets(Brachyramphus marmoratus)have also been listed as threatened by the USFWS since 1992. There is no murrelet critical habitat near the project site.(Federal Register,Vol. 61,No. 102, 1996). There is no designated critical habitat for Steller sea lions or leatherback sea turtles in Washington and no designated critical habitat for humpback whales at this time. Puget Sound Chinook:Puget Sound chinook,also called the king salmon,are distinguished from all other Pacific salmon by their large size.Most chinook in the Puget Sound are"ocean-type"and migrate to the marine environment during their first year(Myers et al. 1998).They may enter estuaries immediately after emergence as fry from March to May at a length of 40 mm.,or they may enter the estuaries as fmgerling smolts during May and June of their first year at a length of 60-80 mm.(Healey 1982).Chinook fry in Washington estuaries feed on emergent insects and epibenthic crustaceans(gammarid amphipods,mysids,and cumaceans).As they grow and move into neritic habitats,they feed on decapod larvae, larval and juvenile fish,drift insects,and euphausiids(Simenstad et al. 1982).These ocean-type chinook use estuaries as rearing areas and are the most dependent of all salmon species on estuaries for survival. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 4 According to the WashingeState Conservation Commission(2002): • �� °� Chinook salmon in Hood Canal are managed as a single stock of mixed origin with composite production (WDFW and WWTribes 1994).They are the summer/fall variety and typically spawn mid-September to late October.They are listed with Puget Sound chinook as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Chinook salmon,also known as king salmon,are not found in WRIA 17 in abundant numbers as spawners and,when found,are either the result of hatchery production or straying.The US Fish and Wildlife Service hatchery on the Big Quilcene River has been in existence since 1911.In 1980,they began a spring chinook program that continued until 1994.That run has not sustained itself over time,as recent spawner surveys indicate no adult returns to the river.Old records maintained by hatchery personnel document sporadic numbers of naturally spawning chinook,probably fall chinook due to the low summer flows,but again, those have not sustained a natural population(Larry Telles,personal communication,March 2002). A small local volunteer chinook rearing project on Tarboo Creek released 100,000 fry/smolts(100/lb)from George Adams stock at river mile 2.5 in 1994, 1995 and 1996. Small numbers of returning adults and/or their associated redds have been observed in the lower river since 1997.Time will tell if the run is sustainable. As an update on the Tarboo Creek program,Thom Johnson from WDFW(pers.comm.,May 8,2009)reported that there is no self-sustaining chinook population in Tarboo Creek. Hood Canal Summer-run Chum: Chum salmon have the widest natural geographic and spawning distribution of any Pacific salmon(Groot and Margolis 1991),and historically may have been the most abundant of all the salmon species(Neave 1961).In the Puget Sound area the spawning grounds are situated near coastal rivers and lowland streams. Summer,fall and winter runs are present.Fall-run chum are most prevalent,but summer runs are found in the Hood Canal,the Strait of Juan de Fuca and in southern Puget Sound(WDFW 1994).In the Hood Canal,the summer-run stocks spawn from early-September to mid-October,while spawning of the fall- run stocks begins about the third week in October and may continue into January(WDFW 1994). Juvenile chum in Washington begin migration downstream in late January and continue through May,although there is considerable variability in the onset of migration due to the large number of cues influencing migration (Simenstad et al. 1982 and Salo 1991).The migration to the estuarine environment usually happens immediately after emergence(Simenstad 1998),but juveniles have been reported to remain in freshwater streams for up to a month(Salo and Noble 1953 and Bostick 1955). Chum and ocean-type chinook spend more time in the estuarine environment than other species of salmon (Dorcey et al. 1978 and Healey 1982).Residence time in the Hood Canal ranges from 4 to 32 days with an average residence of 24 days(Simenstad 1998).Juvenile chum consume benthic organisms found in and around eelgrass beds(harpacticoid copepods,gammarid amphipods and isopods),but change their diet to drift insects and plankton such as calanoid copepods,larvaceans,and hyperiid amphipods as their size increases to 50-60 mm.(Simenstad et al. 1982).Eelgrass beds are probably the main migration corridors for juveniles,providing both forage opportunities and refuge from predation(Simenstad et al. 1982). Simenstad and Salo(1982)found that as the food resources started to decrease in mid to late summer,juvenile chum tended to move offshore,suggesting a relationship between out migration and prey availability. Summer chum escapements in Hood Canal have generally experienced a continuous decline for the past 30 years.However,beginning in 2003,escapements began to increase.In 2004,the escapements were the highest recorded during the period that total spawner numbers have been estimated(1974-2004)(WDFW and Point No Point Treaty Council 2005). In the project area vicinity,Hood Canal summer run chum are found in the Big Quilcene River Subbasin and the Little Quilcene Subbasin. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 5 Bull Trout: Coastal-Puget SoundWl trout have ranged geographically from r rei jallf9 is(at pr�nt tfiey,� r,9. ,: are extinct in California)to the Bering Sea coast of Alaska,and northwest along the P cr norther L Japan and Korea.Bull trout are members of the char subgroup of the salmon family. Spawning occurs typically from August to November in streams and migration to the open sea(for anadromous populations)takes place in the spring.Eggs and juveniles require extremely cold water for survival.Temperatures in excess of about 15 degrees C are thought to limit bull trout distribution(Rieman and McIntyre 1993).They live both in fresh and marine waters. Some migrate to larger rivers(fluvial),lakes(adfluvial),or saltwater(anadromous)before returning to smaller streams to spawn.Others(resident bull trout)complete all of their life in the streams where they were reared.Habitat degradation,dams and diversions,and predation by non-native fish threaten the Coastal-Puget Sound population.The Coastal-Puget Sound bull trout population is thought to contain the only anadromous forms of bull trout in the contiguous United States(Federal Register,Vol. 64,No.210, 1999). There are three bull trout subpopulations in the Skokomish River Basin which enters into Hood Canal south of the site.There is an isolated population in Lake Cushman(due to the construction of a dam on the North Fork Skokomish River),a second subpopulation occurs in the South Fork-lower North Fork Skokomish River,and a third subpopulation occurs in the upper North Fork Skokomish River above Staircase Falls(Staircase Falls is assumed to be a barrier to migration of the Lake Cushman stock into the upper North Fork Skokomish).The first two populations are considered"depressed"(with fewer than 500 spawners in each population),and the third population is considered"unknown"because of insufficient information(Federal Register,Vol.64,No. 210, 1999). Puget Sound Steelhead:Populations of Puget Sound steelhead in the Hood Canal generally average less than 100 spawners per year(Federal Register/Vol. 72,No.91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations). According to the Washington State Conservation Commission(2002), The populations of winter steelhead from all the streams entering Quilcene Bay and Dabob Bay are combined into one stock.They spawn between mid-February and the beginning June(WDFW and WWTribes 1994).Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has been monitoring winter steelhead in the Little Quilcene River since 1999.An escapement goal has not been set.The status is Unknown,both in SASSI and SaSI." Marbled Murrelets:Marbled murrelets are small marine birds in the alcidae family.They spend most of their time at sea and only use old growth areas for nesting.In the critical nesting areas,fragmentation and loss of old growth forest has a significant impact on the survival and conservation of the species(WDW 1993).Adult birds are found within or adjacent to the marine environment where they dive for sand lance, sea perch,Pacific herring, surf smelt,other small schooling fish and invertebrates.There is no critical habitat within close range of the project and there are no nests close to the project site. Forage Fish: Migrating salmon utilize baitfish such as Pacific herring(Clupea harengus pallasi),sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus)and surf smelt(Hypomesus pretiosus)as prey resources.These forage fish form a very important trophic link between plankton resources and a wide variety of predatory marine organisms as well as providing food for marbled murrelets,bald eagles and salmon. According to(WDFW SalmonScape),there are no"documented"surf smelt or sand lance spawning beaches near the site. There are Pacific herring spawning areas along the eastern shoreline of the Bolton Peninsula across Dabob Bay from the site.However,there are no Pacific herring areas on the shoreline adjacent to the project site(WDFW 2008). Steller Sea Lions: Steller sea lions are found on the west coast from California to Alaska.Breeding colonies do not exist on the Washington coast but may be found in British Columbia and Oregon(Osborne et al. 1988).There are no documented haulouts or rookeries in the project area(Jeffries et al.2000),although sea lions are seen in the Puget Sound in the winter(October-May)where their visits are transitory. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 6 Humpback Whales: Due to essive whaling practices in the past,humps wh qr, are-I"°`eefi g, S ig Sound,even though in the past they were much more prevalent(Angell and Balcomb-X82)�cca�ng.to._. Osborne et al. (1988),there were only three sightings of humpback whales in Puget Sound from 1976 to 1988. However,recently,a juvenile humpback whale was sighted near Johnson Point(NE of Olympia),with several fresh injuries(Orca Network Sighting Report-July 10,2006).Another recent sighting was made near the San Juan Islands on August 31,2006(Orca Network Sighting Report-September 03,2006).However,it is highly unlikely they would be present in the project area(Jeffries,pers.comm.). Leatherback Sea Turtle:There is no breeding habitat for these sea turtles in Washington,even though they are occasionally seen along the coast(Bowlby et al. 1994).They are rarely seen in Puget Sound(McAllister,pers. comm.).Again,it seems highly unlikely that these turtles would be found near the project site. Southern Resident Killer Whales:The Southern Resident population consists of three pods:J,K and L. According to Wiles(2004),"While in inland waters during warmer months,all of the pods concentrate their activity in Haro Strait,Boundary Passage,the Southern Gulf Islands,the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca and several localities in the southern Georgia Strait."During early autumn,these pods,especially J pod, extend their movements into Puget Sound to take advantage of the chum and chinook salmon runs.Resident killer whales spend more time in deeper water and only occasionally enter water less than 5 meters deep(Baird 2001). There have been no confirmed sightings of Southern Resident killer whales in Hood Canal.Therefore,it seems unlikely that the proposed project will have any impacts on this species. Rockfish: Bocaccio rockfish are found more often in South Puget Sound,whereas yelloweye are more prevalent in North Puget Sound.All three species of rockfish remain close to the surface as larvae and pelagic juveniles.As juveniles they settle to benthic environment. They prefer to settle in rocky reefs,kelp beds,low rock and cobble areas(Love et al.2002).Yelloweye juveniles are also found in sponge gardens.As the three species grow larger they move into deeper waters.Adults are found around rocky reefs and coarse habitats.Yelloweye rockfish are commonly found at depths from 300'to 590'.Canary rockfish usually habitat the area between 160'to 820'and bocaccio rockfish are usually found between 160'and 820'(Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 81 /Wednesday, April 28,2010/Rules and Regulations.).All three species are opportunistic feeders,with their prey dependent on their life stage.Predators of the adults of these species include marine mammals,salmon,other rockfish, lingcod and sharks. 3.0. Project Impacts The impoundment of sediment behind bulkheads can cause indirect permanent effects on the physical structure of the beach.Linked to these indirect effects on the physical structure of the beach are biological impacts which could affect the functions and values of the buffer zone.Tait and Griggs(1991)have stated that the impoundment of sediments behind seawalls,bulkheads or revetments is the least controversial and most significant impact of shoreline armoring. As stated above,the bulkhead at the Adachi properly is located landward of the OHWM(Figure 2). According to Tait and Griggs,one of the three major factors that determine the overall impacts of sediment impoundment is the landward/waterward location of the shore protection structure.They note in their study,"The basic concept is that the more often and the more vigorously the waves interact with the wall,the greater the potential magnitude of beach response." In an earlier study(Griggs and Tait 1988),the authors observed that, "....the wall which projected furthest seaward was the first to lose the beach in front of it with the onset of winter waves,experienced the greatest scour or deflation,and was the last to recover during the summer months." Other authors have come to similar conclusions.Weggel(1988)noted that: ....the location of a structure relative to the shoreline is an important parameter in defining the degree of MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 7 interaction of the two.If,toe of the armoring structure is located lailkard of OHWM and the water table is not elevated in front of the armor,the structure will in general not cause narrowing of the fronting beach. Based on the above information, it would appear that because the bulkhead is located landward of OHWL,its impacts on the beach are likely to be minimal.Impacts may occur only with unusually high water levels during severe storm conditions. 4.0. Project Impact Mitigation The primary intended effect of the original project was the restoration of the buffer in the area affected by the 2008 slide.This restoration will lead to an improved function and value of the critical area as follows: 1.Increasing ground cover with native plants along the slope above the shore. 2.Reinforcing the slope so that it will be less likely to slide down into the intertidal area.If this were to happen, there would be a loss of the recently planted native riparian vegetation. 3.Increased natural shade and sources of organic material for nearshore habitats and organisms. In order for the installed restoration to meet its planned goals, it was necessary to install the bulkhead.As noted above,this added component of the MRE wall section will have minimal impacts on the overall functions and goals of the original project.In fact,the addition of the bulkhead should increase the longevity of the installed buffer improvements. As mentioned in the introduction,approximately 50 cubic yards of beach substrate that had been excavated for the bulkhead footings was spread immediately seaward along the bulkhead.This was intended to mitigate any temporary disruption of the beach substrate during construction.The additional beach substrate will also be available for the net-shore drift cell moving substrate from the south to north along the shoreline. LOG ITEM r MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 8 References • pc ________________________ Angell,T. and K.C.Balcomb III. 1982.Marine Birds and Mammals of Puget Sound.Puget Sound Books. University of Washington Press, Seattle,WA, 146 pp. Baird,R. W.2001. Status of killer whales, Orcinus orca, in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 115:676-701. Bostick,W.E. 1955.Duwamish River seining studies.In:Puget Sound stream studies,pp. 5-6.Wash. Dep.Fish. Olympia, WA. Bowlhy,D.E.,G.A.Green and M.L.Bonnell. 1994.Observations of leatherback turtles offshore of Washington and Oregon.Northwestern Naturalist 75:33-35. Dorcey,A.H.J.,T.G.Northcote and D.V.Ward. 1978.Are the Fraser River marshes essential to salmon? Westwater Research Center,Lecture 1,University of British Columbia,Vancouver,BC. Federal Register/Vol.61,No. 102/May 24, 1996/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.64,No. 56/March 24, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.64,No. 57/March 25, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.64,No.210/November 1, 1999/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol 70,No.170/Friday, September 2,2005/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol 70,No.185/Monday, September 26,2005/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No.222/November 18,2005/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol.71,No.229/November 29,2006/Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol.72,No.91 /Friday,May 11,2007/Rules and Regulations. Federal Register/Vol. 75,No. 81 /Wednesday,April 28,2010/Rules and Regulations. Griggs, G.B.and Tait,J.F. 1988.The effects of coastal protection structures on beaches along northern Monterey Bay,California.Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No.4:93-111. Groot,C.and L.Margolis(eds.). 1991.Life history ofPacific salmon, UBC Press,Vancouver,British Columbia. Healey,M.C. 1982.Juvenile Pacific salmon in estuaries:the life support system,pp.315 -341.In:V.S.Kennedy (ed.),Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. Jeffries, Steven J.,Patrick J.Gearin,Harriet R.Huber,Don L. Saul and Darrell A.Pruett.2000.Atlas of Seal and Sea Lion Haulout Sites in Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,Wildlife Science Division, Olympia,WA, 150 pp. Love,M.S.,M.M.Yoklavich,and L.Thorsteinson.2002. The rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific.University of California Press,Berkeley,California. Myers,J.M.,R.G.Kope,G.J.Bryant,D.Teel,L.J.Lierheimer,T.C.Wainwright,W. S. Grand,F. W.Waknitz, K.Neely, S.T.Lindley,and R. S.Waples. 1998.Status review of chinook salmon from Washington,Idaho, Oregon,and California.U.S.Dept. of Commerce,NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35, 443 pp. Neave,F. 1961.Pacific salmon: ocean stocks and fishery developments.Pac. Sci. Congr. Proc. 1957(10):pp. 59- 62. Osborne,R.,J.Calambokidis and E.M.Dorsey. 1988.A guide to marine mammals of greater Puget Sound Island Publishers,Anacortes,WA, 191 pp. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 9 Osborne,R.W.2003. Southern rent killer whale sighting compilation 199(03.The Whale Museum,Friday Harbor,WA 98250. Rieman,B.E.and J.D.McIntyre. 1993.Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of Bull Trout. Gen. Tech. Rpt. U. S.Forest Service,Intermountain Research Station,Ogden,UT.38 pp. Salo,E.O.and R.E.Noble. 1953.Chum salmon upstream migration.Minter Creek Biological Station Prog. Rep. (Sept. - Oct. 1953).Wash.Dept.Fish.,Olympia,WA. Salo,E.O. 1991.Life history of chum salmon(Oncorhynchus keta).In: C.Groot and L.Margolis(eds.).Pacific Salmon life histories. UBC Press,Vancouver,British Colombia. Simenstad,C.A.and E.O. Salo. 1982.Foraging success as a determinant of estuarine and nearshore carrying capacity of juvenile chum salmon(Oncorhynchus keta)in Hood Canal,Washington,pp.21-371.In:B.R. Melteff and R.A.Veve(eds.),Proceedings of the North Pacific Aquaculture Symposium,Alaska Sea Grant Rpt. 82-2. Simenstad,C.A.;K.L.Fresh and E.O. Salo. 1982.The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function,pp.343-364.In V.S.Kennedy(ed.).Estuarine comparisons.Academic Press,New York,NY. Simenstad,Charles A.,Coordinator. 1998.Estuarine landscape impacts on Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca summer chum salmon and recommended actions.University of Washington, Seattle,WA. Tait,James F.and Gary B.Griggs. 1991.Beach response to the presence of a seawall,comparison of field observations. Contact Report CERC-91-1, U. S.Army Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg,Mississippi. Washington Department of Wildlife(WDW). 1993. Status of the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus in Washington.Unpubl.Rep.Wash.Dept.Wildl.,Olympia,WA. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW). 1994. 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory,Appendix One,Puget Sound Stocks,Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca Volume,Olympia, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW).2008. State herring stock status report.Kurt Stick and Adam Lindquist.WDFW Fish Management Division. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)and Point No Point Treaty Council(PNPTC).February 10, 2005.Memorandum report:2004 Progress report on Hood Canal summer chum salmon. 15 p. Washington State Conservation Commission. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors.Water Resources Inventory Area 17,Quilcene/Snow Watershed(2002). Weggel,J.Richard. 1988. Seawalls;The need for research,dimensional considerations and a suggested classification.Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue No. 4. 1988.Pp.29-39.s;The need for research, dimensional considerations and a suggested classification.Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue No. 4. 1988.Pp.29-39. Wiles,G.J.2004.Washington State status report for the killer whale.Washington Department Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 106 pp. MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 10 fl--; 5jDagal • HO Figure 1. Project Fig us sw 0 4, cation • i ..., ,,,is, 0'.'2(i .4=.at..,‘. /x...... P . ,..'::::iM7:7111* /2..),-4.A11;,4 IP, " : 's' ' '.1( 4.-&, \IIP42 ':• ‘,,4.-- iigiltitli'H;'' ,titift; 1,104,., ' „Y,410m)(]30',:i. „'.-. .:.;1.0 -Ai'llitt.4v-4,Itszt 'r--:::- ,.,*'-,t...,k AlviLi-',.,& I .,,,--,:i .,.:•;:..-':i ,',/f5'",.4-i•-ik;1.411b121-4.,,,. :tfa:414,N,. ..,;,..-- kilat,..4.J(.4"\,-1%,:; Ak42.rte 1,144,4",titkv-:A4' ,-,-, ,) i4 fm Va.4';f4-*C.-44A- piti‘Aitb.:-.:,,Atq,41filg Wit.-/Olte74 ,=, &,‘.,'-t'illti: ,,-41:,,,,' VI: ,,i'l le Z. f. !'f'Alit.,„.•-rigttitk44\‘7::'cr-rt*ltt;-*#,tig(ii:,,,,.).k1 .sj,..-k.,:-7.;lii• c Algriz ;,',-,-4..NANNitizle*".4*-4,:ti ---. 1,t4x:6A--!'"1-7, I .,4,:iv::,..C4k, .;'-l'infc----.':.'5.TT -'!"•tt.".10,.. 1114-14!,4 Jogiei.:- .'''':;', -kit;.:14,11i' . ':iI.;'-ti"I'I j''' ''ll\t:+'-' •:t , Iltk''';15".:' ttgttj:is,54. --A, vo,1;:),:o.,,,,kt: ,- „no ,,A.), ., :.. (..< .;4;4,-1,6,-, L.%6.4,,,i1-,,...,„;.,;::,1..;„ , ,,•,\, .„, !,4? :,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,, ,..tyr.dgw;:gv.4..:,.11,,09y<?e,-.44.-_--z,v&I,.,,,. .,,, th......,,-,:, -' .1' N,,A,1,..„, ,,,,c4x-,-.---4:::--:;,:s,1:-,4 41 v;.%,,,\ s\\\.-,- ,,,, x.e...,„ i•L) }v. ...w?..1. ..m.lvs..A1/4-.3.-% -fkir ipw.,*--, .=m*r.,-. iritti.„. i 4 - ---- :-- 1 k4,.' S il'-':;:tiVt-t., \,1,NItiti:ge"7, A,Vt.k'.:,41'41),i-2 fikAlltPtiCtikft**.‘ ' ic% k .,-.7,7,,, ,.. -- N IL 1 1 )j1 I'it'll:r43'''4”Itl—Nr ,-",\.\ ''7' - kk'',).-i..",,,...ipi 4. iwiv-AN,,,, ,,,,lim.,: ti.,,t,fri(104,)?, _„, ),!iN---_,-...iitvii-xilf 11-tkr ::>11,70A`\:U\-N' 'igiP'''' '"cii-ilt: 1,±L-1,k,;!..-$-Y`' 0 t PA.13 V44,- ,, Uf.#4. C* `, 1,alt,--", -',.\c,,,=--::::krr•:! ft , :' :- ggi)., 1-pu-A-041444-'::,1),)._,:fr.4).„.4.,(--- \...- -,:::),4,-,-;,t-4.,•,,d ) ji ,i y ,::*1'04'4, lc* .%.,;(14„...koill...,y,',7,14!),,r,oilviAgiliP*4.10'1) „,:ii --11,,„... vf if*e:'; --,- 1.-N.o.i .?:IN., -..i0-41,#. ..!:WA,Zt.i7iti*40,4f.t'.4 t..7;•:'.04 IV;:=.7.111--t*' ..":.-.. '1' .,.'•l'i- Vi' AVIlt(7,)4'fl3.)--‘ki ).i at'ffi:41th''ZIIV-Rrn1111'a 40,0 \•-(.k,),!!:- wir;,.4'ficlitt4:- ;y ei:yttit- 431. 0 *,.,,Y .:!•.1,1i,,,k,' : „,:ft p,'),..'ori4:;z-tt-':'4't1,:iiM'-iIitk'Neekri.-*fj':-;ANtsnlAiq':=':'''Z-*V .1 :tt` ' ''iP4 ; \,,,, killi'(1.9)lifir :Pni rVic,,-‘, ;I:i?4,4fl'i.V1'.;14fl.c-cif.:: 4$-:---''''• !‘ ;.;j fal L-H;'`',j r:-/,'--''''.-.?...,tz ':, '.. :.,::,4,,,,J,, ii,t ,,,,:412 ,.. . ' -2 ..4%).elit,',,j,f4ifogi!'X1_ .-: ,-:,--c-fk';',../.! ,5( -17-% / * 6 frdigyA'i.g.;t1A-4.€4?)zr.4.---",--,7 i ,5,44-Prrit) • 4,. ';0411t.''''''''iL. II: '9,4)t)3N,''.2;,4 re;i ,,n0 ,Vej.,',,'7ftilt! '44,..v4104:440 , irittm,,,ost, „ .4 :,.L.-,.. ,-<-..,,'•Ail '''.;-!.. ,,,,,i',,,i.,-,--1 it ;,-_-_,.:,,,#g•,,,.; ,,,,,,„,, .*4.45-jig ertit114,41,11km-41$41lizor44.4-r'.... c...,&,;:tief,,,,§1*.i,'-' ;'...(,,,,----'1,\\--4*-..,:: s'ill' t--.3‘: :.*-,I,,,•:: t. , v.eke.,51.04. .t.1*?,,,5Alavf.,-;*6,,,iv,v0,,, . ..0A,:fr•-r f\\do,' i.,-\ •••-‘ 1,,x-,'%)',,qttqwf,', 1?-:•4- :'-•, \. t.,•41:14024.4ifitvilit'44000".-1111bAfr/i-li 4,41,tirtk)N1' ' 1,4 °vie-142,.10.4. 1 ‘\ORi3Az-6- 1.-#.7v1.03,14-ivtib.-4,:sda.:464,„,r J.4,i*,v;' .477 N4t141-4jf4',#;AtikfiagAli',' l:V* .k. , tfq,7-Ak vk',•;:.-,. v,-A:AR‘ti:141t.ii,,:ygii-:*fq ,,-:,i01- --,4f4441.-t„..-,.•.4,rf*,;4'ei/Ntb-11,q511..t. .tilyt iltffiriLktik"),:,:iii'.''-'1,v4V-4%,;';•e.,),I.A51Z-W,',i AN? "-,.4...4.011,,pgfels.$4,44144,44-4figti.--.,,--;:;‘,, ..'.....A.:-:?,,,,,,;4-kz,z-i.‘4,,:-.1,- ,•.:y,,,wifi_,,,.544Tuwir.,m1P4 c1:04''44-f pif'''•' 0:(.0"4,-74,--,-.,co , .•;,.:,,,,r!\:),'?. %,3,---,54.4,1ttAgaC k.,e'd:;:*4,5:4:;;:iil* .kki.,,:t'..-'r7,-'44*10R-.594*RdAV"',V,It' - ImMOV'1,4,1044:',* )s,) grAt'Llne--4:)...;0:5,::;*ci:45tgillnlii:Rf.:1#, 'Awl 4)). '-ek..-- .),::::,.,„,,,4•44,,,,,,,,,,,.:).1,4.:,4„k-,.)o,*g,,,A.q,v,z,.p,.,4,-,,..11.-4,-, .ziii7,0,-/), :...,,/,- ,-,-,-.,.--,----ir-rliv--, )-v-.4.5,114kv*);...,„--ti,.!7: ,z':L;VRI-*-Ag,-ctVg-*i •g-ta'pAlif iitk5 41, „,,•f. . -- ..7,', (i. \A ,:iv*:*oq,fliumt'-' ttkr(,,riqr:' i 1 •.,,,,,..,;::•;,44,,,,.....i4„..;‘,„44..,_,:„.4„....„..,...,,„_.....,t, ,,4-,;:r Tit 01.,.,:;:lip;,I, ,w..:=1-41,-afili- ,0,1-,2p. .' -, t,F4W51$1? ',=..•,,,;•. ,,,-4.,..,t;r4.,:i.,,,,t, ,,,,,wot,.74:40_,f.k. ..'elAl,.:'-'i",”'"(1 4(,.>4',\.'•'--*.''''';''ii ' , A' ''''.:71 ''(-1, , -,44,:i-1,,a' ',,I.-i'i: -:','''Y '•-', M4elt*'-'1.41.4;4.,144P'!'tt4fiii:',..;,I;f4.44::: ':- '..f?,'c3I'M ) uM * a,• A'11,,,,/i 4-,9,; I 1,,,,?,,ci.vv, &,,. ..,j: vt,,,\7--.T.',.1*:',,,,,.)I( 7/7/ ,it.,- ...,/, •v,. , -2 4÷,-..,-, ;-. (.-..101.,:;-c.24- \` 's t-',; .„:y .4'1, .--',_•,:.1.-.,,,-., 4.,,>!..„1, . .,) ,t;;, ., • _ • ,,, _ /!, )c.,;.---.1-, .--..: -, v. 4(i- • .6):-% ;,*:'44',,,,,,,;,,,,;::-s— k, ,1-..-- m."----4 ,2:•-.,F4----*A-41**,- ) ; --) Al,• •$. 1P9=-4;4:-:,/, t4., -. 7.., /,., '\ -k : ' t , .44-,:,-',-'4.:•, ,,:„,4‘„,,`.„ ,n•,",',7,, ,3,7'`""'-' : .../r; i' ' ''' '," :-.,,,y,ir'' :,-' '..4..:".,.,,,.:'%;.A.V.4.-,-. ,.., ,, ) ...); :%.4:.1, .,.,::,,. .g.ok'vl'.'- / IA'-.1,i ' •-, ' . -" r----•-_., .7' / 01' ,(11 ,rj. :../'-■., .. - •-:'7":, \it_W,..,7°)44V i : / (/ k, r---, i,iii' .'',-:,.-.' T-:----.:..:.,..;: , 4 _,- / / i - 0 , \ , ::--'" ' ..i .N,4* 4---CP3::, l 1 / il . , ift)',- ,,, f / ■ NV ,rw*:::A/7 1 ,,:,,. I r li• ,I;7..4,,N ''' ''.'s,...&•,,,-,,,r7; -'t' ,.-•.„',;;;"// / i'..:Mk‘ (441,,,,Taikt,'"‘'175/ ) 4 %, ,,, ,,,,,,,, ,7,,„,„_:„.....L.1• ,. ...:„.4•/„..-;„,....„.„„cf.:;„...•:_„., , „ sif p.".-„,,,;.-=,-,-,•''---. --- -':c .„ • fr.. ,,,„„„,..topo.com) •:-''.:;.:'.z \ ,7 ., ,; ,/2 0 (W 01949 TOPOI hinted from TN71IN • 1 1 Addendum fewardshi Plan d MS&A Adachi Critical Areas S lD Figure 2. As-Built Site Plan W.W.I a '�°� ' 1 ` g 6 I' y q Q s »� M;� 1 �1 1 :�, ` 1 _t 1I I ti ' it i . En 1 \ .` ,\ \ It I j. fa I 1 3,, 3„ , ,q ,.. 4 .... :i a}}r - , -. \ ) / ' . . i , /.......,e I VI..t .... , . � ' o �; N. . 11 1 �'�, r I . t- xr — i I 1t �.. f 1 1 \ , VI 143 etl rt • : / r t iiJ- 1! i .../ w 4..o.%:,:-. tli,.,p ii_ , vi z ✓ h /, - ' - i -. ,00 44 r .. ftti•Y‘...:4"".: **%•: t:■ke,°,4 CAL«.�4G%.,..1.Oe\`;�4"%44'1∎%'♦.4�'c 1".:.- .F' Z - .. GO L♦ L♦ L ♦♦ L4 ♦ 2, �44i`A.�,\t'4 .4y`'4G44\'4L'4.E''4L'"4iS i�'4\L{G`�. - s 0. •re L�1 ',al g It IL m ' i2 M 14 io lek 1 74-- -- 11 i c< a I fciv i g 11 ..,, MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 12 • e Figure 3. Original MRE Wall Sec• „., --.....„_....._.,..2) 3 ii .C it. i A Z bis: E l Q 11411 ; -112 111•11B Fill a.41:- g ...I i pts 1111 ' , i-1 3 iii .',E,1 /, 5= in \��\ E a a� oi✓ m 'E c?„, Ep ' E h. z W � vii g z € IA' S-) I g, 5 E - g 7" 8 ,,,, > • i co .> z o $ 3 � � �' 0E2 is oo Q W m a x.c �' m m c o ° m „� m i IL ti-Vi o5 E vii gg vP xl W t iWg o 3 3 t as E �. ° / - HIE m " o m W a ig n , g. 0, axi .g ea € t ks AZ Z c C78` F_ q l csis °i vil �.g ¢g oiD 6 c i c+i 1: MM11118 r N vi NI: MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 13 *Figure 4. Revised MRE Wall Section• ,LOG rrilTid ..,,, ..A„ 43t rt t:_,--77,----- ---,- New slope face /Slope reinforcement . .....-,...,- . : ...,..,.. ,,..., - • . ... '. .•-• 1'max t Reinforcing layer 1 / •:::": :z:=..:.4-:,,,:--.:.'-„, , ..,"" - - .:,f -____,Z 1.4 -:- :.:-..-V, ,....,. --""' --,........-,... . ..,,,,:.. -...... ,..:- . Restored bead)with 10'min.' I embedded logs ,.....,- ....,,,. Use UX 700 as a 4-6 man rade) minimum strength. Tie layers between rode). Use 2"..46 rod(backfill against facing(4 filet) FIGURE A ALTERNATE ROCK FACE WALL Not to scale MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 14 *gore 5. Original Reinforced Earth •ess LO .; iTi mv. ILiwo : I �.m„e, fs X22• ti Mil E 1 1 1 I I 1 a lit 1 11 1 w .5 11 1 1 11! I a 7 8. ( 111 I 2 8 4°° II v _ 0 11 i i tt , .41 II" gt N.1‘ I . , INS I is » s i ii su I -al is e . , z. " cr• og c C I I Ii. t lli ! `o *a MS8.A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 15 Aspect Constg Design Change for the West-Face MRE Toe Wall ' •As�ct .,. LT _i VI CONSULTING I. July 13,2011 y 5= _.d The Estate of Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S ' SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject: • Design Change for.West Facing MRE Toe Wall 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove,Washington Project No.080029-001-03 • References: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT,Landslide Remediation-Adachi Property,1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report,Dated October 27 2008, 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,Design of Slope Buttress, dated March 5,2010,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Executors of the Estate: At the request of your contractor,Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Aspect Consulting met with Craig and Jason at the site on July 5,2011.The initial access road had been roughed into the base of the slope.We observed,after the toe area was somewhat cleared,that the topography at the shoreline had be severely eroded by the past winter storms.Without the protection of the already planned improvements,in place,the 011W had moved 10 to 13 feet shoreward.There is no room to move the buttress further away from the shoreline and maintain the design function.Therefore,the face of the MRE must change to be more protective for the MRE.A rock face integrated into the MRE would withstand the approaching wave action.Still,the shoreward area would need to be rebuilt with sand and logs to maintain a sand beach as already planned. A design sketch of this new face section is attached as Figure A.This section would be needed along the west-facing zone of the wall from the north end of the turn to about 40 feet south.At that point,the original wall face would be sufficiently far away from the 011W,as not to need the additional rock. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you.If you have'any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspect consulting,LLC IIt°14 Ai P Ash 11 7 I% riiikra 411. 5°.gyp 9 ,8802 a4 7/13/l -47810NAL its.' V John L.Peterson,PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson®a.aspectconsulting.com Attachment: Figure A-Rock Face MRE Wall cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders(via Fn il) W:\OEOTECH■080029 Adachi LmublideiDeliverablesVuly wall Change.doc i . ht! s!',0 _, 6 rtk '. .,a,°t t + MS&A Adachi Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Addendum • 16 Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] LOG ITEM Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:06 PM To: John L. Peterson; Bill Matthews; Donna Frostholm , Subject: Adachi Site Visit Hi All. I spoke with Donna Frostholm at the County today about Adachi and we need another site visit to see how things have turned out/post construction walk through. I wanted to check who would feel it helpful and/or needed to be there with us. Please advise. We are aiming for a meeting either next week or the following week. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 Donna Frostholm • • I rte_ ' ° 1 From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.coml d Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 2:38 PM Pa-To Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Meeting Donna, I think we will be the only ones needing to meet with you on site. What are your available dates? Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 1 Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:55 PM L BG4 ,111-1:1: . rI To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Attachments: Adachi revised SEPA and JARPA 7-2-12.pdf Great! I have attached the revised JARPA and SEPA. See you next Tuesday at 10:30. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday,July 02, 2012 7:46 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Tuesday at 10:30 would work. If I have the revised SEPA checklist and JARPA by tomorrow afternoon, I can bring the posting information to the site visit,which would save you another trip out there. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:08 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Would Tuesday the 10th work for you instead? Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent:Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:04 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi 1 Jenny: Are you available Wednesday,July 11 at 11:00? If you have a revised JARPA and Environmental Checklist that includes the bulkhead, please forward that on to me. Regards, Donna/FrosthoLvw .Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Thvnsend,Washington 98368 dfrosthani@cojefferson_wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent:Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:54 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Adachi Donna, When are you available to meet at Adachi? I believe it will just be us that meets you and if there are any questions for Marine Surveys or the geo-tech we can get in touch with them after. Thanks, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address 2 4: 4 a,,4 CNCY E 'kg Date received: ' US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE ofEttlngin rs Seae • Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form'°2 Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. *Revised July 2, 2012 To replace previous JARPA Part 1-Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create.Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) [help] Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2-Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last,First,Middle) Adachi, Yoko 2b. Organization(If applicable) 2c. Mailing Address(Street or Po Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2d. City, State, Zip Seatac, WA 98188-2313 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi @comcast.net 1Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http://www.nws.usace.armv.mil/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpaae ESA • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermittinq.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/iarpa iarpa form/9984/iarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help aora.wa.cov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 15 II • Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact `` ! Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note:Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b of this application.) Iheipl 3a. Name (Last,First,Middle) Rotsten, Jenny 3b. Organization (If applicable) Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 375 3d. City, State, Zip Kingston, WA 98346 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail (360)297-2401 ( ) (360)297-2308 Jenny @sealevelbb.com Part 4-Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. (help ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at(360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name(Last,First,Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 15 LOC ,-$ Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ® Private ❑ Federal Q Publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR)—managed aquatic lands(Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address(Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 253 Deer Creek Rd 5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town,provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene,WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson County 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long.(Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47°46'48.09" N / 122°47'30.72"W 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel#(if known) Jeffery and Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Alan and Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish,WA 98290 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 15 LC = c r79t ._.__ 51. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] None 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help] ❑Yes ❑ No ® Don't know 51 Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] Deciduous and evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos submitted previously and CASP. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [help] SFR 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] SFR 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. [help] Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] From Hwy 104, turn onto S. Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd and follow for 8.5 miles. Turn left onto Coyle Rd and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road to the water. End at site. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 15 .;5.... I • Part 6—Project Description (1 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope along with a +1-40' bulkhead along the shoreline. For the buttress, approximately 25 yards of 1-2 man rock, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill, 25 yards of 2-3 man rock and 30 yards of crushed rock used. The bulkhead includes approximately 37 yards of 4-6 man rock. All work is behind OHW. See attached plans completed by Aspect Consulting. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [heipl There was a slide at the site during the winter of 2007-2008, which removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The work on the site was designed to restore and stabilize the slide area, prevent future slope instability and re-vegetate with native plants. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial ® Residential ❑ Institutional ❑Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/Pier ❑ Marina 1 Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 5 of 15 • 7; 34 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. (help] • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. As shown on the plans, the slope was cleaned of all organics, logs and rootwads were salvaged and used along the toe of the bulkhead and MRE wall. Loose material was removed from the slide area. The new toe was excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions. The geo-grid was layered as directed on the plans and per the geo-tech recommendations and the material compacted. The rock armor on the top of the slope was placed along a>1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5'where<1:1, 1-2 man size rock was used. The rock bulkhead is needed at the face of the MRE wall due to increased erosion that was noticed during a site visit by the geo-technical engineer on July 5th, 2011. At that time it was noted the OHW line had moved 10-13' landward from where it was previously identified. The bulkhead is +/-40' in length and behind OHW. Please see letter from Aspect Consulting dated July 13th, 2011 for further detail of this inclusion to the plans. The construction road was created for access and replanted once work was completed. Drainage was installed as needed based on engineer and/or agency requirements in response to conditions. The access area was re- vegetated once work was complete, along with the remaining planting areas. See planting plan in CASP for planting mitigation and monitoring areas. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction?(Month/Year) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: July/Auq 2011 End date: ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $130,000 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help] • If yes,list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 6 of 15 L i y V� Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the j roect has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to w P 9 p etlands. help [ ] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] ❑ Yes El No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help ❑ Yes ❑ No Il Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [hew] • If Yes,submit the report,including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [help] 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the DARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 15 ;„1,.t • impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigaira6 plan witty similar table, you can state(below)where we can find this information in the plan. [hetp] Activity(fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq.ft. or category2 Acres) acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as`Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 'Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. `Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. (help] 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 15 Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation _ y In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) rho)] ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. lhelpl ❑ Not applicable The entire project is behind OHW. Replanting of the exposed areas for mitigation along with the expansion of plantings for monitoring has created a thriving new native planting area for the shoreline property. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [helpi ® Yes ❑ No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 9 of 15 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies?[help] • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable Please review GASP 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. (help] The replanting plan was designed to create a healthy native planting area on the property to support shoreline fish and wildlife habitat. 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area(sq.ft. or dredge,fill, pile name' location2 impact3 (cubic yards)to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody Fill-1-2 Man rock Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-25 yards +/-60' Fill-geo-grid fill Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-1017 yards +/-60' Fill-2-3 Man rock Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-25 yards +/-60' Fill-Crushed rock Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-30 yards +1-60' Fill-4-6 Man rock Dabob Cove Adjacent _ Permanent +/-37 yards +/-40' Remove Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-15 yards +/-40' 'If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as'Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount(in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [help] Fill consists of: +/-25 yards 1-2 Man Rock +/-25 yards 2-3 Man Rock +/-37 yards 4-6 Man Rock +/-1017 yards geo-grid fill +/-30 yards crushed gravel All fill material will be placed above OHW. Source of all fill materials was local quarry. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 15 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredgirig, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Excavation consists of: Removal of+/-15 yards of material to allow for rock bulkhead footing to be dug into the substrate. This material was left on the beach, per allowance from WDFW. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson Co Donna Frostholm (360)379-4466 July 2012 DOE Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site WDFW Margie Schirato ( ) July 2011 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [help] • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know,use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.qov/programs/wci/303dt. ❑ Yes ® No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code(HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.gov/surfilocaterndex.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.qov/services/dis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 15 • 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.qov/programs/wq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [help] • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to:http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApptications/Pages/fp watertypinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If No,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ►1 Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [help] • If Yes,please describe below. ❑ Yes ® No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] SFR 9k. Has a cultural resource(archaeological)survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes ® No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 15 • 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. (help Please review CASP 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. (help Please review CASP Part 10--SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.goviopas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or helpt ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) (help • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ®A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson Co (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.)[help] ❑This project is exempt(choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. II JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 15 • 1 Ob. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [help] LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ® Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for$150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# } ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ) ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 15 — — • Part 11—Authorizing Signatures �-�-- Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. 11a. Applicant Signature(required) lheini I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief,the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and l agree to start work only after i have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoA riz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. r-- (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also-give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. <5,i4"-- (initial) Applicant D e t' S hs :l c&c..)■ 11b. Authorized Agent Signature lhelpi I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. Authoriz;• 4 ent Date 11 C. Property Owner Signature(if not applicant) !help! I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. if you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA).People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 JARPA 2069 ---- --_ Page 11 of 11 ;,:, 314 owahr e JEFFERSON COUNTY I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~. " 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 iilli 0 360/379-4450•800/831-2678•360/379-4451 Fax ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Adachi Landslide Repair 2. Name of applicant: Yoko Adachi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner: Yoko Adachi, 19223 34th Ave S Seatac, WA 98188 (206)824-3734 Contact: Sealevel PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360)297-2401 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2nd, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable) Work completed under Emergency Shoreline Exemp. SDP11-00012 3/23/11 SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 1 r 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geo-tech reports prepared by Aspect Consulting and CASP prepared by Marine Surveys and Assessments 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. HPA from WDFW, Substantial Development Permit from Jefferson Co. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope along with a +1-40' bulkhead along the shoreline. Please see JARPA, plans and CASP for more details. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 1253 Deer Creek Rd Quilcene, WA Legal Desc: S3 T26 R1W, Lot 1 (N1/4)SUBJ to Ease V500/P97 see plans B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling, hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. Steep. See geo-tech reports SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 i ; s b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Vertical c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silt, clay. Please see geo-tech reports. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, � � 1 S--1) describe. Yes, winter of 07-08 there was a slide It $ s r L G - e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. v1 j.9 Indicate source of fill. Fill will consist of+/-87 yards of 1-6 man rock, 30 yards crushed, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. All precautions taken per engineers. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? N/A ' O h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: so f° -� l:+ All precautions taken per engineers. ��j�0is qv' a.Air e. OfIS a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Machine exhaust during working hours b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Dabob Cove SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 tt p . 1- 4 � f 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes, all work is behind OHW. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)D Does the known proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan 0 C G UG 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 01.1 Cte No (r( Taxi Mal /rcIa Met b. Ground: L=V_ per ftiv 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example:domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff(including stormwater): t� 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, �(�e��5M a�l� if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into �' f-co °r� other waters? If so,describe. v None o � ^-Y�,� L�b 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. {7 - Gr "C h No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary drainage was installed during construction to control any surface water. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 • w> i T Ei+ 9.7 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1 deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree: fir,cedar, pine,other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the slide area will be cleared. ( fay-1/1 fare()--) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. U t� rQ . 0 ro e Unknown �� j �,� d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or en ance \� vegetation on the site, if any: J Please see planting plan in CASP 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: s , C; cbawYvov1 birds: hawk, heron+^ bir l they: mamma ls�g bear,elk,beaver,other: S.Go r- d- oY`t'14∎ a()W fish: bass = .. out,herrin! a .ther: vYt-S 1AMAA b. L ist any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. eiC d hD U-51 l Please see CASP c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Uknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Replanting with native vegetation on the site 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. --111.e e., is -fie No AD-1-e►2fi Ce bl� S- ne)v, 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. y �yl y�i r I None t'i'I'�i'JZ CUA,n {� nom, �l(y� 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: t,�w4"l't�"'^" ' None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? None 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction,operation, other)?Indicate wha-tj I� hours noise would come from the site. . D i € W N Equipment noise during work ‘..A 'E-" r ' 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: lSkt% None 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? SFR b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. Unknown SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 Loci; l 1 1 c. Describe any structures on the site Owner's home d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? t (�„� ,vJ '`� P. 5 RR-5 ���Y�OU f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ` Ri/ A Ct I2 w RR-5 I S� �'Gl/` g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? RR-5 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. Shoreline iro jeCvt 00re Gt i5 VAAA-+n RAIN-C-A tuff, O zte cater Vvgk✓cOJS are a� "`,` fek-Vic o (e61)- i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? �U S. - L ,/ Af s6y. N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low- income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 J s 1 i " 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Plantings 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shoreline related b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. Unknown b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None at this time SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 - • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the Dee{ Cfl _ po-ad existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Deer Creek Rd, Coyle Rd �' r 1.f-6-ad b. Is site currently served by �} y y public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest" J transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: N/A 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 La I k..v fir,'/'j�' 16. Utilities a. Circl- ies currently available at the siti natural gasrefuse servlc , ..• -nitary sew=., 1i 3 •',other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: `— ��, --� Date Submitted: J 2-(J..1- SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 • • Donna Frostholm i , , r_. From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 5:31 PM To Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Thank you Donna. Please bring a new board as I'm not sure if the old one is at the site still. See you then. Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! Reply message From: "Donna Frostholm" <dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us> Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 4:46 pm Subject: Adachi To: "Jenny Rotsten" <Tenny @sealevelbb.com> Jenny: I will bring the posting packet for re-noticing the application on Tuesday. Please be prepared to post the notice. If you need a new notice board, let me know and I will bring one(note:the applicant would be charged$10 for another board). Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday,July 02, 2012 2:55 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Great! I have attached the revised JARPA and SEPA. See you next Tuesday at 10:30. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 / Kingston, WA 98346 11 n a ,egad 1- (360) 297-2401 u� (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday,July 02, 2012 7:46 AM To: Jenny Rotsten 1 LCD_. 0 $ I ciVI CC d- = CO CT L_ _0 Z U_ `__ O H O d- J -� O O J a) - CV Y LLI O 'O - CU J O O L- CD "O X CC -a +-I CO Z C C� O = H W O O CO -{-1 "O H O O I .. L L _C CO I` CC .O U C, C.) W Z 0 CC C3 J C1 O_ g 1 L1 I-- I- O O CD a) CO -0 = O U CC 'O W C = = CO 3 1— CO \ O 0 co ti J Ct O o, 'O CC C7) Z 1.0 C M O Cl O I-I W 1 -- CV Y X W CO X >- CO O O I- I-- CO I° O O >- CO C/3 O CO 'O CC r- LO W UJ = = CO C LLI CV >. J W CC CC LU CO Lu CL CO W CO CC I- I- O O U I LI/ CC 10 Q .. CC r- 0 .% U7 I- X \ 0 H H CC LO CL O 3 d- 'Cr C3 CC CC = = = X (.0 LU = I- C_) C_1 I- O J CV CC ,-- CC LLI Q ¢ '0' M Z O I- I- o o CO U LLI "O 00 ,.-■ I- X LU Q CC C_) CC C� CV H I- O J Cr) CC I- -3 = CO CL O O CV I- O I- [n V CO CO X Y Y CV CC a) CO O = CC = Cl O O O CS) LU C9 CO J CO 0 -N \ CD >- } 107 CC CO - O O U7 CV O O O CV Cr) Cr) O C_) Q CO CC 0') O CO O o CO CU O O O -O C_ CV I` O C_) a) CO C) = ## C O v a) .. L 3 L. CC Y C - CD O +-I CC) 0 a) a) m a) -- = CL: a) C) CO a) -O > CO C) L L 0_ - O CO CL L. V 0 X -1-, U 'O X 0 CO Cl CO -- -- CO a) I- I- X 4 I- U3 CO (I- X * I- CC • • JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER CASE NO. *P10 - 0°°S-7 /iL /otec° CERTIFICATION OF MAILING 3._..... ._,L...._...., $..,.... I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this [0±/7/ day of 2012, I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed, true and correct copies of f ' in the above matter, addressed to: /Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) Agencies: See attached list. Interested Parties: See attached list. J\P /Applicant/Representative-Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction,Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. v Newspapers (Notices Only) ,: Official Posting Places (x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. EXECUTED this/day of 4111 , 2012 at Port Townsend, Washington. eclar. ► • G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2012.docx * I • • i1 Le1"yM1�s I1 a . .g 601032020 3 { � a "J 3 YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE `' YOKO ADACHI TRUST 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC, WA 981885313 601031008 RICHARD J ALLEN MARILYN V ALLEN PO BOX 10446 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 981100446 701344050 JOHN N KAPP MARY J KAPP 783 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE, WA 983768602 701344016 DAVID J KREIMER VIRGINIA KREIMER 9307 21ST AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 981172708 701344051 MARIANNE B MAC DONALD 975 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE, WA 983769691 601031005 MACKENZIE DESHLER TAD CYNTHIA MACKENZIE DESHLER 533 NE 90TH ST SEATTLE, WA 981152956 601032021 JEFFERY S VINCENT GEORGIA A VINCENT 4584 ROCKAWAY BLUFF RD NE BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 981103708 • • .v., : LOG , gat • ■ ■ V • • SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE SEALEVEL BULKEAD BUILDERS INC 19223 34TH AVE S PO BOX 375 SEATAC,WA 981885313 KINGSTON, WA 98346 SDP10-00051 *DOE WETLANDS *WDFW RICK MRAZ MARGIE SCHIRATO PO BOX 47775 414 BUSINESS PARK ROAD OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 SHELTON,WA 98584 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY RUSSELL HOLTER PO BOX 47829 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7284 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD. RANDY LUMBER KINGSTON,WA 98346 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW *SUQUAMISH TRIBE KRIS MILLER ALISON O'SULLIVAN 80 N.TRIBAL CENTER ROAD PO BOX 498 SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SUQUAMISH,WA 98392 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL *US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CYNTIA ROSSI CENWS-OD-RG ATTN: JESS JORDAN 7999 NE SALISH LANE P 0 BOX 3755 KINGSTON,WA 98346 SEATTLE,WA 98124-3755 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WA STATE DNR *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON SEPACENTER @DNR.WA.GOV 5310 EAGLEMOUNT RD PO BOX 47015 CHIMACUM,WA 98325 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7015 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *DOE SEPA REVIEW WDFW SEPA REVIEW SEPAUNIT @ECY.WA.GOV SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7703 1111 WASHINGTON ST. SE. OLYMPIA,WA 98504-3135 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE QUILCENE SD#48 GIDEON U. CAUFFMAN PO BOX 40 1033 OLD BLYN HWY QUILCENE,WA 98376 SEQUIM,WA 98382 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 JCFPD#2 *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS BOB LOW JIM PEARSON PO BOX 433 QUILCENE,WA 98376 • S SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSO PAT PERRYMAN PAT PERRYMAN SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *JEFFERSON TRANSIT *JEFFERSON COUNTY EH DIRECTOR 1615 W.SIMS WAY JARED KEEFER PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WSDOH SHELF AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 PO BOX 47 ATTN: BILL GRAHAM OLYMP WA 98504-7284 PO BOX 929 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SDP 10-00051 SDP 10-00051 *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS *PORT TOWNSEND LEADER CHARLIE BERMANT ALISON ARTHUR 1939 E SIMS WAY PO BOX 552 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 37 ' _ 5-3 SON co JEFFERSON C TY t� H` � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street{Port Townsend,WA 98368 Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment 4-:14,.44-§`0, . Tel:360.379.4450!Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcd @co.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review(Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center LOC July a,2012 " Dear Reviewer, 3 RE: MLA10-00155 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope;access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. This proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 Comments must be received within d+r4-y (3c)calendar days or byAw#Asria, 2012. If no written response has been received within .tn,,r4y (3c) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. e / 21/) /D - oo • . Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, / Donna Frostholm cc:RICK MRAZ, * DOE WETLANDS MARGIE SCHIRATO, *WDFW PO BOX 47829, *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT. - MARK TOY 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106, RUSSELL HOLTER 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD., PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE RANDY LUMBER, *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW KRIS MILLER, *SKOKOMISH TRIBE SEPA REVIEW ALISON O'SULLIVAN, *SUQUAMISH TRIBE CYNTIA ROSSI, *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL CENWS-OD-RG ATTN: JESS JORDAN, * US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON, *WA STATE DNR SEPACENTER @DNR.WA.GOV, *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW SEPAUNIT @ECY.WA.GOV, * DOE SEPA REVIEW SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV, WDFW SEPA REVIEW GIDEON U. CAUFFMAN, *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE PO BOX 40, QUILCENE SD#48 BOB LOW, JCFPD#2 JIM PEARSON, *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS PAT PERRYMAN, *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR 1615 W. SIMS WAY, *JEFFERSON TRANSIT JARED KEEFER, *JEFFERSON COUNTY EH DIRECTOR ATTN: BILL GRAHAM, *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 CHARLIE BERMANT, *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS ALISON ARTHUR, * PORT TOWNSEND LEADER \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 7/9/2012 • JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA10-00155 LOG APPLICANT: ` _37 YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: July 11, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on August 10, 2012. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to ma omments related to SEPA. There will no another comment period after'the ' threshold (final) SEPA determination made. If the threshold determination is a etermination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Comrrr age at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ ,. JEFFERSfOUN ` • L i -' I T � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `t 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 Pa 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax g www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment CM= 'IliC Master Permit Application MLA: 1 0— I Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): ' ‘.o -- Stale;k i.-. 0.---k-I kWTh t 11-r- Tax Parcel Number: (o O j t)32..O ...0 Property Size: „1_,, (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: .. m i . d -,/0 s 5-3 Property Owner(s)of Record: S E' t CAT- ,CA-C-t-t Telephone: 2-0(a —`AZ-(-1— 2 -3t1 Fax: email: Mailing Address: q b'.- 41,. -S Sect- • C--- v.?A 't`• t.: — 3 t Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): ScaUt 1 )stA-tli✓I&k F,tAi\de,.rs , 1i.0 Telephone:Warp"Z`t l- - 2-401 Fax: ?14O-Z -3- 2- 2 email: alt.).0...l bbc"Si1 UGV I+AtL.{�.2_'t' Mailing Address: PO C t` a►'\ sffCtn, (j,,Pk--- q 4 y What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies I ['Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CI" ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat*" ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑Propane ❑Long Plat'"` ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments"* ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* $I Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DE IGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate' n1pit t'tJU�_&t:k 1AfS to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE f{/ /G2f; Date: - 1 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the appl' jion that he or she wants priornotice. Signature: i'.../-°' 62../� � Date: a/ (/f �C? The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfe 'ble respon ility fo 9dhering too apd complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclai and signs and dates it below. Signature: �� �� ^✓� C �' Date: IC. i Ll G, G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc ■ ._• ftn BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the respo sibility of the General Contract r for the proposed project. Signature: -,;2 ".." � j / <:? Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTA L G �i3' ITEM PHONE: N � Lvq- ITEM MAILING ADDRESS: : (<3 7 MAIL: _'�_ CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE ")x `�"`"• / r of $2 WAINS P NUMBER: 111 `°'�NUMBER �� ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: ' EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# Water Supply: pply: ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: 0 Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Protect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: I Underground Tank 1 Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove I Fireplace Insert I Hot Water Tank I Pellet Stove I Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured I Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, includin• the reserve area. S•uare Foota•e Current Pro posed �s � `i ,,...1-,17 �t4T'- � r . Main Floor Heated . . f , 4 : . •.. Review: 2 ' Floor Heated - - Consistency Review: Other Heated .k s Mezzanine 3 Additional F, Heated Basement ; 5 Unheated Basement 7 Other Unheated k Oh- -. Garage/Carport ! , Decks -. Approach Other 4 TOTAL: ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish *00 M0 — Initials: G:\PerntitCcnter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc AGENCY USE ONLY Date received: .,. US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE Engineers of Engineers SeatUe ostnct Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form'°2 Tax Parcel#(s): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. LOG--ITEM *Revised July 2, 2012 To replace previous JARPA Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create.Examples:Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) hel Adachi Slope Stabilization Part 2—Applicant The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [help] 2a. Name (Last, First,Middle) Adachi, Yoko 2b. Organization(If applicable) 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 19223 34th Ave South 2d. City, State, Zip Seatac, WA 98188-2313 '2e. Phone(i) 2f. Phone(2) _ 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (206) 824-3734 ( ) ( ) s-adachi @corncast.net Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http:Hwww.nws.usace.army.mil/PublicMenuiMenu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage ESA • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help)screens,go to http://www.epermittinq.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenterliarpa Lrpa form/9984/jarpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help a,,ora.wa.gov. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 1 of 15 _. • - _ _ Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11b of this application.) Ihelpi LOU 6 1 3a. Name (Last,First, Middle) Rotsten, Jenny s� 3b. Organization (If applicable) Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 375 3d. City, State, Zip Kingston,WA 98346 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 Jenny @sealevelbb.com Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. !help) ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at(360)902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. (Last,First,Middle 4a. Name ( Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone(t) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail ( ( ) ( ) ( ) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 2 of 15 Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ® Private ❑ Federal Publicly owned (state,county,city,special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources(DNR)—managed aquatic lands(Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address,provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 253 Deer Creek Rd 5c, City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town,provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Quilcene, WA 5d. County [help] Jefferson County 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 3 26N 1W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long.(Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47°46'48.09" N / 122°47'30.72"W 5g. List the tax parcel number(s)for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 601032020 511. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space,use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel #(if known) Jeffery and Georgia Vincent 4584 Rockaway Bluff Rd NE 601032021 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Alan and Jana Haws 13419 80th St SE 601032023 Snohomish, WA 98290 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 3 of 15 1_(,)U__ i I Li — y}F : _L w0 y._ 51. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help] None 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. theip1 Dabob Cove 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help] I-1 Yes No ® Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help Deciduous and evergreen trees and native shrubs. See photos submitted previously and CASP. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [help' SFR 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. Ihelpl SFR 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. [help1 Owner's home 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] From Hwy 104, turn onto S. Point Rd for 1.6 miles, bear right onto Thorndyke Rd and follow for 8.5 miles. Turn left onto Coyle Rd and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Deer Creek Rd. Follow road to the water. End at site. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 4 of 15 Part 6—Project Description ! p 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope along with a +/-40' bulkhead along the shoreline. For the buttress, approximately 25 yards of 1-2 man rock, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill, 25 yards of 2-3 man rock and 30 yards of crushed rock used. The bulkhead includes approximately 37 yards of 4-6 man rock. All work is behind OHW. See attached plans completed by Aspect Consulting. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. (heipi There was a slide at the site during the winter of 2007-2008, which removed part of the driveway access to the single family residence. The work on the site was designed to restore and stabilize the slide area, prevent future slope instability and re-vegetate with native plants. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial ® Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation D. Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ® Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam/Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/Levee/Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/Pier ❑ Marina/Moorage ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging U Mining ❑ Stairs ® ❑ Stormwater facility Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Utility Line ❑ Other: JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 5 of 15 • 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. - coaruction methods and equipment to be used. het • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. x • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. {� As shown on the plans, the slope was cleaned of all organics, logs and rootwads were salvaged and used along the toe of the bulkhead and MRE wall. Loose material was removed from the slide area. The new toe was excavated to depths appropriate for existing conditions. The geo-grid was layered as directed on the plans and per the geo-tech recommendations and the material compacted. The rock armor on the top of the slope was placed along a >1:1 with 2-3 man size rock minimum. The lower 5'where <1:1, 1-2 man size rock was used. The rock bulkhead is needed at the face of the MRE wall due to increased erosion that was noticed during a site visit by the geo-technical engineer on July 5t', 2011. At that time it was noted the OHW line had moved 10-13' landward from where it was previously idenified. The bulkhead is +/-40' in length and behind OHW. Please see letter from Aspect Consulting dated July 13th, 2011 for further detail of this inclusion to the plans. The construction road was created for access and replanted once work was completed. Drainage was installed as needed based on engineer and/or agency requirements in response to conditions. The access area was re- vegetated once work was complete, along with the remaining planting areas. See planting plan in GASP for planting mitigation and monitoring areas. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (Month/Year) [helot • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: July/Aug 2011 End date: ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help.' $130,000 6h, Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [held' • If yes,list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No Cl Don't know JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 6 of 15 r.._d4, Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation `� = ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.)[help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable • 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? net ❑ Yes (1 No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If Yes,submit the report,including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] • if Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [heipi 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 7 of 15 • impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below)where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or °,. sq.ft. or category2 Acres) 1-5‘-} I I s :i VI acres) 'If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as`Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. °Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s)for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [hemp"' 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. )help"' JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 8 of 15 - _ _ _ Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [-hemp ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] ❑ Not applicable The entire project is behind OHW. Replanting of the exposed areas for mitigation along with the expansion of plantings for monitoring has created a thriving new native planting area for the shoreline property. ** ITS. $��a 37 I �53 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? Ihelp] Yes No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 9 of 15 ______________ 8c_ Have you prepared a m plan to compensate for the project's adverse im non-wetland xvatSrbodkea? lbelPl / nr,:t /�F'-�� o If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. 4/ • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. El Yes El No Not applicable - g�2 +�/ �/�� Please review CASP 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] The replanting plan was designed to create a healthy native planting area on the property to support shoreline fish and wildlife habitat. 8e. Summarize impact(s)to each waterbody in the table below. [help' Activity Impact Duration of Amount�m��l Area dredge,' (clear, pile marne, location2 impact3 (cubic yards)to be linear' 'ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody FiU-1-2 Man rock Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-25 yards +c80' ill-geo-grid fill Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +1-1017 yards +/-60' --FU\-2-3 Man rock Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-25 yards +/-80' -- Fill-Crushed rock Dabob Cove Adkacent _ Permanent +/-30 yards +/ GO' FiU-4-8 Man rock DabubCove Adjacent Permanent +/-37 yards +/-48' - Remove - Dabob Cove Adjacent Permanent +/-15 yards +/-40' 'If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as Stream 1 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2lndicete whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur wit mmo1o0-p,aronoup/am_ 'Indicate the days,months or years the work. Enter'permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. |oe|N Fill consists of: +/-25 yards 1-2 Man Rock +/-25 yards 2-3 Man Rock +/-37 yards 4-6 Man Rock +1-1017 yards geo-ghdfill +/-30 yards crushed gravel All fill material will be placed above OHW. Source of all fill materials was local quarry. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 10 of 15 • [8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Excavation consists of: Removal of+/-15 yards of material to allow for rock bulkhead footing to be dug into t e,soupstrot„e. This material was left on the beach, per allowance from WDFW. Lq, ,2J 1 I i Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help] Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact Jefferson Co Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 July 2012 DOE Jeffree Stewart ( ) 12/15/09 on site WDFW Margie Schirato ( ) July 2011 1 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [help] • If Yes,list the parameter(s)below. • If you don't know,use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.qov/programs/wq/303d/. ❑ Yes ® No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://cfpub.epa.govlsurf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number(WRIA#) is the project in? [help] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/servicesfgis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 17 JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 11 of 15 -- , ---, 4111 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water qubl r.p i*ct r turbidity? fhelpl • Go to httpJ/www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wo/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. ®Yes El No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act,what is the local shoreline environment designation? hel • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to:http://www.ecy.wa-qov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules1173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ® Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [help] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.qov/BusinessPermitslTopics/ForestPracticesApplications/Paqes/fp watertypinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ® Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? fhelpl • If No,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ® Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 91. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? fhelpl • If Yes, please describe below. ❑Yes ® No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] SFR 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes Z No JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 12 of 15 • 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Please review CASP t ' ' TF:,: R5v �3 7 .5-3 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Please review CASP Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at(800) 917-0043 or help[cora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). (Check all that apply.) [help] • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.pov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. ❑A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ®A SEPA determination is pending with Jefferson Co (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in fob.)[help] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 13 of 15 V °' "{ .p„,..,..�...va.s...m 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [help' , -- LOCAL GOVERNMENT $ � Local Government Shoreline permits: ® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit (l Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: ® Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption—Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for$150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: ❑$150 check enclosed. (Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ❑Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. (Agreement# ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. (Agreement # ) ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor,or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. (HPA# ). Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits(U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: L_LI General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA Revision 2012.1 Page 14 of 15 Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures required before submitting the JARPA package. rrP_ 'I la. Applicant Signature(required) ihelp} I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoriz the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also-give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. Applicant Datee �C,+K1tt jib. Authorized Agent Signature Ihelpl I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief,the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. 1.1 IL y//91(0 Authorize 4 ent afL Date C. Property Owner Signature(if not applicant) [help} i consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA).People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service.People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 JARPA 2009 Page 11 of 11 . . • • --, { ,,1 ,,,,� r 3 _ ,,, ."..,......,,, ,...3j ,p. t 4., JEFFERSON COUNTY 1f„1 ,4` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1, \ �. 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend -Washington 98368 360/379-4450 •800/831-2678•360/379-4451 Fax ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Adachi Landslide Repair 2. Name of applicant: Yoko Adachi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner: Yoko Adachi, 19223 34th Ave S Seatac, WA 98188 (206)824-3734 Contact: Sealevel PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360)297-2401 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2nd, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable) Work completed under Emergency Shoreline Exemp. SDP11-00012 3/23/11 SEPA Environmental Checklist Page I . 1111 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geo-tech reports prepared by Aspect Consulting and GASP prepared by Marine Surveys and Assessments 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. HPA from WDFW, Substantial Development Permit from Jefferson Co. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope along with a +1-40' bulkhead along the shoreline. Please see JARPA, plans and CASP for more details. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 1253 Deer Creek Rd Quilcene, WA Legal Desc: S3 T26 R1 W, Lot 1 (N1/4) SUBJ to Ease V500/P97 see plans B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. Steep. See geo-tech reports SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 • rr ...,..�33 ka ] b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Vertical c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silt, clay. Please see geo-tech reports. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, I S describe. f p osczsy Yes, winter of 07-08 there was a slide e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. i,eit Indicate source of fill. �J Fill will consist of+/-87 yards of 1-6 man rock, 30 yards crushed, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. All precautions taken per engineers. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? N/A � D h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: n SI -� .) 1 All precautions taken per engineers. nitSbrlACA'Y a_Air tarts a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, r industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Machine exhaust during working hours b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Dabob Cove SEP.4 Environmental Checklist Page 3 • 2)Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, all work is behind OHW. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan 0 C G Urj Unknown 01905 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No a pe c4 -11O( b. Ground: Y`u r�a reins 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example:domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, ake Vta if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into P other waters? If so,describe. 1r None � 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. {. /41 No ' L d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporary drainage was installed during construction to control any surface water. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 • ! 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: I deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree: fir,cedar, pine,other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the slide area will be cleared. `(0,i4 fare0- c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. + i O'r r C } Unknown ���.ed �'.e..���� 0.c- 44-e t �-h/�e Jac d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or en ance a c e Q • vegetation on the site, if any: 3 Please see planting plan in CASP 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Sic) it e CzVY1tm.cm birds: hawk, heron -a• - .-.•.bird •ther t t mammals- , bear,elk,beaver,other: CO c0 ir _ (Ou'r J ' fish: bass . ,out,herrin. •they: --hirthetS b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -e4c famed 4 U9, t -c-- Please see CASP cza, , c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Uknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Replanting with native vegetation on the site • 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 3 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. y�" No 1ffe ►5 l -Q. a�eatia1 - ,y-- `�P+IIs- Veav" 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. -r i 1 f None QY1� Yl 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? None 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction, operation,other)?Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. n (D e v'0 tk Equipment noise during work Iw yk- 1c(te' 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? SFR b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. Unknown SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 • 53 c. Describe any structures on the site. Owner's home d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? -VUr l ��C' j 11 RR-5 C�Jt�t I f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? f { / RR-5 s ✓�t� t` ►G�Ln ilal 1 , g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? RR-5 C h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. Shoreline rol2ckafeGt t5 W►` /� All-FCA too cam') a_ opte*culkiwawv cLoUS ar 04/1 attkiPeAK if e-fl a a r'er`t- i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? a, cow k I v uzalt N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low- income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 -r .. ..._...... __ 1 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Plantings 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shoreline related b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. Unknown b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None at this time SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the e (yam: (d system. Show on site plans, if any. Trm'cl:3- 1766d �� existing street sy p y Deer Creek Rd, Coyle Rd 1• b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest" transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: N/A 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection, health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A SERA Environmental Checklist Page 9 s. 3 3I 16. Utilities a. Circl- lies currently available at the siieTectrici natural ga-!' '► _ - - ele••+e-, -anitary sew- -.mom-.•,other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 1 IF Date Submitted: 211 _ SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 • • L:-..)- § Aspect �� d CONSULTING _ �-- _ �.,.., March 10,2011 The Estate of Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac, Washington 98188-5313 Subject: Update on Schedule of Work for Slope Buttress 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington Project No. 080029-001-03 References: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT, Landslide Remediation-Adachi Property, 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008,prepared by Aspect Consulting, LLC Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report, Dated October 27, 2008, 1253 Deer Creek Road, Dabob Cove, Washington,Design of Slope Buttress, dated March 5,2010,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Executors of the Estate: At the request of your contractor,Aspect Consulting, LLC has evaluated starting work before June of 2011. If the work is delayed to June,the possibility of more surficial slides between now and June is very high and will potentially increase the volume of restoration work to be done on the project. The design of the project will allow it to proceed at this time of year.due to the all-weather nature of the lower site soils and fill materials. Controlled scaling of the surface is going to create less volume than unabated surface landsliding. We would encourage the permit reviewers to allow this work now and the contractor to use wet weather construction techniques to make progress in controlling this slope. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspect consulting, LLC .�S,.PErt• off- ,.,,_ • IFS k fYh lI , {k°,.,,,,,Y`•,. cam` �/j O 18802 - 3 John L.Peterson, PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson gaspectconsulting.com cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders(via Email) W3_GEOTECH1080029 Adachi LandslidelDeliverables1March 2011 Construction Letter.doc + !WPaCt suttil , t 171 Madrone 1*ieV't'ainbrglie Island WA 50110 20678(}93783 1rutm pettcotlstsEfta€t� APPROVED • r • SITE PLAN L; , . .s.. 't j a Ze - laa 9 2 �c - Z 7 sg m W -s = › MAR 2 3 2011 - _ _ 53 �o� m� rn F� � a ,r „ Aso m°s 9 o a 3c g r _. -.. Iii a £m - 3 R i 8 °°s 1- m JEFFERSON COUNTY '- 3�_ °m a z n r 3 DEPT.OF CO 1TY DEVELOPMENT „„..0.28,1, o e n. n = 3 z ° v ' 3 oino iS ,41,,,,.. g o i' Z °° SIGNATURE:.$.__ - 3 _ o n \ tr I oaf in: 1I9I pi 1 R a a1. is m '11111111111 ip ; g rn \ # �`►, i�-, 1 rg 4 a I i ii. of ,: ., i q al , ) li I 2 s Z iii ► I ` s IIM 0 it. : Rh . /,\, . I/31 • I▪ t: I 1E;I ?Fe: til ;Iti —1 — 111 I I, s . \ i s a . a I I I I1 $ ' II 11 as \'\ \���$ i€ ! ii 1 *61 .. III$ 1111 .R #s ° a a a e a a as ° ° a a a a a a aD 1 \ 4 1E1 °Q � iaF g if aul tvi P ill 1 II VII li 7 ae ' _ s 3 m g 5S; il I Ilhi m -H gig. s9 8 i §§H 1 c ill 0 0 asr, vi 11 �k $ In a O g93 Z g m Z e ��� a a "s 1a F' V� �` JI a B \• Si Z I0 A 0 W a a Li a • • BAs p ect 3 7 IP CONSULTING July 13,2011 The Estate of Seiichi Adachi 19223 34th Avenue S SeaTac,Washington 98188-5313 Subject: Design Change for West-Facing MRE Toe Wall 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove,Washington Project No. 080029-001-03 References: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT,Landslide Remediation-Adachi Property, 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,dated October 27,2008,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Addendum to Geotechnical Investigation Report,Dated October 27, 2008, 1253 Deer Creek Road,Dabob Cove, Washington,Design of Slope Buttress, dated March 5,2010,prepared by Aspect Consulting,LLC Dear Executors of the Estate: At the request of your contractor, SealeveI Bulkhead Builders,Aspect Consulting met with Craig and Jason at the site on July 5,2011.The initial access road had been roughed into the base of the slope.We observed,after the toe area was somewhat cleared,that the topography at the shoreline had be severely eroded by the past winter storms.Without the protection of the already planned improvements,in-place,the OHW had moved 10 to 13 feet shoreward.There is no room to move the buttress further away from the shoreline and maintain the design function.Therefore,the face of the MRE must change to be more protective for the MRE.A rock face integrated into the MRE would withstand the approaching wave action. Still,the shoreward area would need to be rebuilt with sand and logs to maintain a sand beach as already planned. A design sketch of this new face section is attached as Figure A.This section would be needed along the west-facing zone of the wall from the north end of the turn to about 40 feet south.At that point,the original wall face would be sufficiently far away from the OHW,as not to need the additional rock. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you.If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspect consulting, LLC 1�•PET�. of WAs / -L-44/2 c� 18802 $ -7//,/"/ John L.Peterson,PE Senior Associate Geotechnical Engineer jpeterson @aspectconsulting.com Attachment: Figure A-Rock Face MRE Wall cc: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders(via Email) W:\ GEOTECH\080029 Adachi LandslidelDeIiverables\Juiy Wall Change.doc Aspect Consulting,LLC 179 Nia`dtone tape N Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 206.780.9370 www aspeetc6nsultGaq eam • F • . Date: o:i /21 c��// Project#: 0 00 a 9 Page:y� et. consulting /�Jpp ( c- s / r#h+water Project: 14cota.r.Ar/ - Ire. i^D,r.� ,- Subject: 2 k £c e, ink 7.43- 1,2'e,,,,,, . mi Q O . I u t • , . fo I.I • - : II . ® �_. 1 p,:. . . . • • . .. . . . , . : . 1 . . . . . . . . . , .a.. ..........•...•. . : : : ,. :: ; :. ,.. II . , . . 111 PI :i• fir . . • , ,• , . , ..:. . . . . , . . . t 1d 1 ._....,..::...i..:. :/..,7/1# „,: ..;:. .... ... . 1, ..:. MR lAibliil ,. ,. , :.. . ''' ''':::._.:.:.;...'.1.::... .':1.;.:.......'.:''.:H.::.':..:1':::- L : I: ; .; H.. ft ,.. -;:...;;. '1•••".; ::: :: ' ;',, ':. : ; ;;', .0- ', : .:: ''' .. 1 i ..... ; ., : ;-; ;. i .• ;;, : lik ' t _... 1 - , 7 'All y _ ;rs- ®p :: ... .,.:7%•_,.^v d I, • • . • e / _ i OC ' r-Vi ,......‘... —, ) 4 , Pane -,.:, or LOG T-7-71 1 ,- L , , ndslide Rem a ° n c ediatl° A 1 dacif Property ,.. Stewardship Critic at Area „--- , rdship Nan .. ,,.. r 4- ,-----,, 1 a vi k , ( I ok pat \,,, t...t.„ 2011 ...., ';) ,1' January 13, , , ' 5 ''` ?,-- , i , have ‘ '-- , I1., ,p1. 4) ..,,,4 ; i ,,,,,,.; '•' i t 41 4 , 1,/ 1 k . ij 7 ,,,, ,..0„eoltt...s ) 1..) +if i -T-' -1*---)) (nTr,-77:10,3 i, Y RE,,,__,ii...4 For: , =it Derek Adac hi 19223 34th Ave. South uh Seatac,WA 98188 it L,1t-.-cq1- [n I St ON Luu 1 ' CD Prepared by: Assessments Marine end, Port Towns -4073, Fax: (360) 521 ,.,..c.n a Surveys y,us tr ve ae yd Wawa A syA • (360)385 .inc@gmall"ni Phone: s:s83s68 385-21;; Email: marine.surveys pp I/ 37 Landslide Remediation Adachi Property cal Area Stewardship Plan Addendum January 20, 2012 zz, ( K IA 0 t -TO k 1 _ - For: The Estate of Derek Adachi 19223 34th Ave. South ; Seatac, WA 98188 JAN 1 zifiz Prepared by: Marine Surveys if Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360)385-4073 Email: marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com a �UJ ff 4 ",J7P'1 :y,.. �`To ui/c¢n¢ i 3 c'''' fe:w F P :; co es. ^ i fir•• [' <ft Di n Cu F_ rtrt ,.... ii m i t',"Fr' m i o i S IlliA-7"':"- B rf u 1 I. iilliNkN litts■-.E444 ,,,/"ENW .--,'..\ Li -1 � 611120yiki o M . q c� - • T j '' r' 4:, it Vu �� N LiWMMiliratL'S',;,:,-....,:> -0'l �.�� ENR� � Z,` 11 �'N AAt' scre00i .MHO :.:.�,r =f;%q O� o �r I��I/ i�. �0 Tno '� __ iz to,ea �,II'I Yzpi � ^ Lx i ,����_:.�� un 'F':TA Fy ne r) i0 , w°Illy 11 .... I A TV i1 O`� �. IA �P 3m j ' .II..__Y•~�`,. `, n\ r IR ,li 3 A ��II�� c��- P o�9'O i\ i��� a� i i I :l 7. i� look.a �illl�v �a A L 3 iAiE `` r 8 liti,. u.A lop tier ' 1!;111PIAIII "s 7 T m ' r u' it l•vtwN� •- 4 v^ m N Of .3-,Af; >1 ail ..-+ R�K. V I �. N ill- a. :iT i y 3 m mo @ m ,'ir� 1 u W ....71:,.:1. S::V-,'.,..,4.,...."::::.-'1111r:,241..a...' H e �j 11111141.:''lai'l .„,,,.... Am G1 , .... . m'4. m0 T \ n >Cw --L yam N ,,,4',,, { = sp �T :: r� o1 N O D O '9 2 y D 6 O D s n D Z m 0 D 3.)' o 3 2 9 N 0 -i D T,N r m m O D O T O Tpe 0 y y T .�x 0.OD <°T Z D rO, N _ C y -DV 2 O D D 5i N O°c I 0 . M D mn OZmD n vo m o Tr u p v v 0 N� > 7., m 'n 0 m p N0 Q T Z CJ m m N :21 0 v n> > m 5 ()).1:» 1 p J i o° _ y m '14' I I ' m• • • . . ,..., ax-4aK 1 i rIg''9.4' S ..a. :.:w.,• $ g!,,,, '-'1,§ri'07;iVi d f, - n2-.<0;•,-, -4 ',','5 c..c., t::::: 4... .-;:•:sq Ok40,.. sk iAx-PT.7.153gt,-,Xqo •,,,, F. 'g '",z!z2- - 4 1411:6i, ,, ,:t. . x- 2 61 2 2 Zi A'' • =7 _ x s,,,z af. .<.: ".,: 2 •:::::: ■/g 5 2° ;';A 2 t. r" a Z P4 g -. .g.: .g,T,^ ti- 1 . 8 <T, 0'-..' N .?:•'1*.r.•...?. 4 .faq ,ang ' .. CO-I ..,:: ',,:•*FA 6,''$F2LP.63 0 °ig z A il ?.°' 4 •-„ 6 28c-I5'r, . " — * r., '6 .,:,..A4, t4P-°P.8 '. 8 z 8 > )ii N =Lg a: P V a . 0 * ■`..'" :.'*;:..tl. c'' M — ,P. ftga: :.,... 4.--, (NE1/4 4 - 26N - WO /-2414j I ::fl..„,...„.__.,..1-5.72__. ...,..„._ • .. "'1 n i.” ,.• / i , i 1 / • 7 ^0- , 0 "5 ,- . i / / 9/ ,I "Z■51 '--., Fo;;'4. • cl• , ' 9 13; ,..; 'ii .. °go.. ' ,,,,-,, •gj, -,,--, ,.., •-•.`,,. A 'A ' iS) 7 I . 2 ,7•71.1,E.,..z., / ^-, . 7,, N) ;.•• '8--7.•zz; t •,,, _ ..°'',:=4;F. ot.., I -rl , 7 C.;! ; 0 / a, *- c..... ril • ,,poo, . 0 'C'8 8 ..."1 < co 09. (.,0cn 5'0 0so 3, rri .s.... . 00 05, P X-'1■1 (-”<.(7 - (..,C 0 o 6 _. 0 (.,‘33-4 a' Iv-4 0 .,. . ri _.., 000 0 ,...s, § F.r,sa. r_tj La c-,cn 8 1;:-J'a• ' 0-' 08 222 0 2 u._ 0 • 4.0 8 0./„. PqP i r'''') -n: ,,'4a (LI ). 1 8 t i„.6., 2 kl a' '?c; 6 S, --. . 0 r„ • _tn _ ".P o C) _ 0 F r00 - mwe <0 2 z ) - '- c - Oo 0 , o o '..'-' '' N P ,<,o --, X 1 `,(-■....4 (.--, 0 1.)//7 4,f, .,.\- -)-{-3 ------- ----,3/*"' P -:-..:. :..- NO • _ -o - 30 Ci - _ 3 - - \ / \- --- (f) i l l ;oV.-a be d P .r.' \ \ ...,... __, \ (-1-) 1 \ \ GOVT LOT 1 i 0 0 / ,„ Y . Do 1; (NE1/4 3 - 26N - 1W) V\lail 001 cr, o 0 Frl o m -0 o (-, , N - Q., 9: ..-, -1:. r7,3, e..2 -in .) 18 Z - ;-, ti'(;), 8 i ■"; : 2 - ° 5 °• N2 r- • • Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 3 POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by July 11, 2012. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE • JEFFERSON COUNTY • PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA10-00155 APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: July 11, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on Augu9-E10;20lz. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. • • SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ fi, AAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE • JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE _ �J ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL:A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed,the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of , 2012. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2012. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in , Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp30_APO_U.rpt 7/5/2012 • • Donna Frostholm From: Legals Email [legals @ptleader.comj Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 9:27 AM To: Donna Frostholm [ 3 Subject: Re: publish notice mla10-00155noa on 071112 10-'Donna, Your legal ad request has been received and your ad(s) will publish on the date(s) stated in your email. We are setting the referenced ad today for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the ad is actually published and measured. Our estimates will give you a figure close to the actual cost. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the ad is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of your legal ad. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Thank you and have a great day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 on 7/9/12 7:54 AM, Donna Frostholm at dfrostholm(a>co.jefferson.wa.us wrote: Hello Legals: Please publish the attached file one time in the Wednesday, July 11, 2012 edition of The Leader and reply to this email to confirm that the notice will run this week. Donna,Fros-thol vv Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port'Pownsenci 1Nashington 98368 dfrosthoCm@colefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday; DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 1 Please publish one time. PUBL-I DATE: July 11, 2012 ' .., I BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA10-00155 APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: July 11, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: • T • he application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on August 10, 2012. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 37 AJ _-... \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp3O_Pub_U.rpt 7/5/2012 • JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA10-00155 ! APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: July 11, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on August 10, 2012. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to •• comments related to SEPA. There will Ike another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If a DNS or MDNS is appealed to the Hearing Examiner, parties of record may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision to the Appellate Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Hearing Examiner Notice of Decision. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type III permit application that is subject to SEPA review. An open record hearing will be scheduled. Separate public notice of the SEPA threshold (final) determination by the Administrator and the date of the hearing will be provided at least 15 days prior to the hearing. Appeals of the Administrator's threshold decision will be handled at the same hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type III permit application will be made by the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community-web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ ss 3-3 IlkIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I c 4n 1 03 L 5+.4,1 being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. These two notices were posted in full compliance with JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the iu day of 31A-1,11 , 2012. •, jeC, (Sign: of perso posting notice) • Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day Mt , 2012. Acknowledgement: 4110k A.116 \���\��iuiurrrr�'i 4gfr .r1i mt. of Washington, �`U �\aai®;� ��■'•i `I1.1.• Wa i gton. =Cv �'. . 0 rest. . i [f► . = cT: NOTAp My commission expires: — ` r ' = U: �•e : m _ . PUBLIC WA ',/// \ \SAN NG\\� ' NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): YOKO ADACHI TRL jut, 201L ` ' \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp30_A JEFFERSON CilliNTY • SON c oy DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment `� Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship resource Center ra FINAL _...,_. .e. r DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE 44 AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: September 18,2012 PROPONENTS: Yoko Adachi 1253 Deer Creek Road Quilcene,Washington 98376 PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay that was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark(OHWM) of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. This work was also conducted above OHWM. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. This proposal requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development permit for a Secondary Use from Jefferson County,which necessitates public noticing and a public hearing. Other state and local agencies, including but not limited to, Washington Department of Ecology,Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Natural Resources, and U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,have been notified and have had an opportunity to comment on the proposal. PROPERTY LOCATION: 1253 Deer Creek Road,Quilcene,Washington 98376. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel Number 601 032 020, Section 3,Township 26 North,Range 1 West, WM, Lot 1 (N1/4) SUBJ TO EASE V500/P97. NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Qrdinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL PERIOD: Any appeal of this determination on the basis of noncompliance with the provision of Chapter 43.21c RCW(State Environmental Policy Act)must be submitted in writing before 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 2,2012 to the Jefferson County Development Review Division(Jefferson County Department of Community Development, 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend, Washington 98368)for consideration by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner. Per JCC 18.40.810,the decision of the responsible official on Type III permits making a threshold determination of a DNS, approving a proposal subject to conditions, or denying a project under SEPA's substantive authority may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to JCC 18.40.280. The open record public hearing on the SEPA appeal shall be before the Hearing Examiner,who shall consider the appeal together with the decision on the project application in a single, consolidated hearing as further set forth in Article IV of this chapter. Any requests for reconsideration shall be governed by JCC 18.40.310. The responsible official's DNS may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner by the applicant or anyone commenting on the environmental impacts of the proposal (as further set forth in JCC 18.40.810). The appeal must be in writing, in conformance with JCC 18.40.330, and be filed within 14 calendar days after the threshold determination is issued as set forth in subsection(4)of this section. Appeals of environmental determinations under SEPA, shall be consolidated with any open record hearing on the project permit. (See RCW 36.70B.110(6)(d)). A notice of appeal shall be delivered to the Administrator by mail or by personal delivery, and must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the last business day of the appeal period,with the required appeal fee of$973.00. The notice of appeal shall contain a concise statement identifying: • The decision being appealed and the identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal; • The name, address, and phone number of the appellant and his/her interest in the matter; • Appellant's statement describing standing to appeal (i.e.,how he/she is affected by or interested in the decision); • The specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appellant shall bear the burden of proving the decision was wrong; • The desired outcome or changes to the decision; and • A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, signed by the appellant. Any notice of appea not in full compliance with this Section shall not be considered. 4e."(Qir : Swith ✓J Z- cie Hoskins, S A '/sponsible Official ate MLA 10-00155 Adachi Application Page 2 of 2 • • Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:41 PM To: 'sepacenter @dnr.wa.gov'; 'sepaunit @ecy.wa.gov; 'sepadesk @dfw.wa.gov' Subject: FW: sepa final -jefferson county-adachi mla10-00155 Fs Attachments: adachi dns.pdf DNR, DOE, & DFW: Attached is SEPA Final DNS for a shoreline application. This application was sent out for SEPA review, as part of the notice of application, on July 11, 2012. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Regards, Donna Frostholm Assistant Planner Jefferson County DCD Original Message From: HP Copier Digital Sender [mailto:hpcopier @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:37 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: sepa final - jefferson county - adachi mla1O-00155 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. JEFFERSON CONTY • SON co�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment 9SNING'C Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd @co.lefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review f Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE LOG 1 S{j AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS �sd DATE: September 18,2012 PROPONENTS: Yoko Adachi 1253 Deer Creek Road Quilcene,Washington 98376 PROPOSAL: Shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay that was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark(OHWM) of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting,the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. This work was also conducted above OHWM. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. This proposal requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development permit for a Secondary Use from Jefferson County,which necessitates public noticing and a public hearing. Other state and local agencies, including but not limited to,Washington Department of Ecology,Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,Washington Department of Natural Resources,and U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,have been notified and have had an opportunity to comment on the proposal. PROPERTY LOCATION: 1253 Deer Creek Road, Quilcene, Washington 98376. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel Number 601 032 020, Section 3,Township 26 North,Range 1 West,WM, Lot 1 (N1/4)SUBJ TO EASE V500/P97. NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. • • NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment,and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL PERIOD: Any appeal of this determination on the basis of noncompliance with the provision of Chapter 43.21c RCW(State Environmental Policy Act)must be submitted in writing before 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 2, 2012 to the Jefferson County Development Review Division(Jefferson County Department of Community Development, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, Washington 98368)for consideration by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner. Per JCC 18.40.810,the decision of the responsible official on Type III permits making a threshold determination of a DNS, approving a proposal subject to conditions, or denying a project under SEPA's substantive authority may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to JCC 18.40.280. The open record public hearing on the SEPA appeal shall be before the Hearing Examiner,who shall consider the appeal together with the decision on the project application in a single, consolidated hearing as further set forth in Article IV of this chapter. Any requests for reconsideration shall be governed by JCC 18.40.310. The responsible official's DNS may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner by the applicant or anyone commenting on the environmental impacts of the proposal (as further set forth in JCC 18.40.810). The appeal must be in writing, in conformance with JCC 18.40.330, and be filed within 14 calendar days after the threshold determination is issued as set forth in subsection(4)of this section. Appeals of environmental determinations under SEPA, shall be consolidated with any open record hearing on the project permit. (See RCW 36.70B.110(6)(d)). A notice of appeal shall be delivered to the Administrator by mail or by personal delivery, and must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the last business day of the appeal period, with the required appeal fee of$973.00. The notice of appeal shall contain a concise statement identifying: • The decision being appealed and the identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal; • The name, address, and phone number of the appellant and his/her interest in the matter; • Appellant's statement describing standing to appeal(i.e.,how he/she is affected by or interested in the decision); • The specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appellant shall bear the burden of proving the decision was wrong; • The desired outcome or changes to the decision; and • A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, signed by the appellant. Any notice of appea not in full compliance with this Section shall not be considered. dIP cie Hoskins, r'10 sponsible Official MLA 10-00155 Adachi Application Page 2 of 2 .w._,. '- JEFFERSON COUNTY 1, iiii, (a '``. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I �' . - r 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 . ,. 360/379-4450•800/831-2678•360/379-4451 Fax ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Adachi Landslide Repair 2. Name of applicant: Yoko Adachi 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner:Yoko Adachi, 19223 34th Ave S Seatac,WA 98188 (206)824-3734 Contact Sealevel PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360)297-2401 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2nd, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable) Work completed under Emergency Shoreline Exemp. SDP11-00012 3/23/11 SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 1 • 1 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geo-tech reports prepared by Aspect Consulting and GASP prepared by Marine Surveys and Assessments 9. Do o you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. HPA from WDFW, Substantial Development Permit from Jefferson Co. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Slope stabilization/landslide repair to include reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope along with a +1-40' bulkhead along the shoreline. Please see JARPA, plans and CASP for more details. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 1253 Deer Creek Rd Quilcene, WA Legal Desc: S3 T26 R1W, Lot 1 (N1/4) SUBJ to Ease V500/P97 see plans B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. Steep. See geo-tech reports SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 • b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Vertical c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, silt, clay. Please see geo-tech reports. • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, �� r�1 C describe. fr pp.o ' �� Yes, winter of 07-08 there was a slide 5ry" L e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill will consist of+1-87 yards of 1-6 man rock, 30 yards crushed, 1017 yards of geo-grid fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction, or use? If so,generally describe. All precautions taken per engineers. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? N/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: --0 --Pro foss :� All precautions taken per engineers. 0fiYLt� P� a.AirpZ • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Machine exhaust during working hours b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Dabob Cove SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 • 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Yes, all work is behind OHW. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan ;) o c(u(5 Unknown roc �� 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, t describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 06- No /yin - OCY, b. Ground: In Ct r yr( i2 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general p t'it C�'��� nog, description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example:domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff(including stormwater): Vr1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, tO k.►r S 1 if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into (1\ vylaiti other waters? If so,describe. .t,I DtiO None CL yr 1 Uqk ' Dv& 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. -Co U(� No ��' LL' d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Temporary drainage was installed during construction to control any surface water. SEPA Environmental checklist Page 4 • • 4. Plants a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine,other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the slide area will be cleared. (01n 5 C'Qa c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. {\ r 0-rte -0(0-1A+5, t Unknown p�ea ?.��.�r1 p.f 4 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or en ance {\C ct r-e tt vegetation on the site,if any: Please see planting plan in CASP 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be L' on or near the site: 5 ;de., co OAli 1-0 1 A-U birds: hawk,heron -a. - of!birds ether: mammals- e ,, bear,elk,beaver,other: 'CA►'1Li- r✓Y+f' t fish: bass - !DM-out,herrin ell they: -XL'Y-F b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. e4c ut3 Ir_� Please see CASP c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Uknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Replanting with native vegetation on the site 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 �. _. • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No -n1 , 15 VOILeittiCt. tr. 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. Cnea V L VYLe None ,�,� V°' I 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: iV Lij '►i e afri None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation, other)? None 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, operation, other)?Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. T (� ENO v1 Ct Equipment noise during work i '4-_ rm 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: v�� C.D��S�Y� �y None 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? SFR b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. Unknown SF_.PA Environmental Checklist Page 6 c. Describe any structures on the site. Owner's home d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? VA,k Lt P` ,,�L ( !i: 5 RR-5 l f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? fvL t1 RR-5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? RR-5 Coyv>zirva/it,e.A.,v/ h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, (, specify. -Po��,c.$ air eA_ 15it2)4 irr Shoreline w f CA t(0_0 2 3 \A_01-0v2:61/4_,s O i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? C>tala 1 ,, 1)"AtAkCj N/A ,V1.�C t 6)4\- -)A-Q- • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low- income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A SEP1t Environmental Checklist Page 7 • 1.�-V_ ,.. / -..- 10. Aesthetics a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any Plantings 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shoreline related b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe_ Unknown b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None at this time SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 __ x • 14. Transportation a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the �,, 2 ((a k_ R(,t( � existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. j G� rlr K6e-Ci Deer Creek Rd, Coyle Rd C,6-1f2- k_DT1-4• b. Is site currently urrentl served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest" transit stop? Unknown c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: N/A 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection,health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 • 13 1 8_�� 16. Utilities a. Curd- . ties currently available at the si a ectri natural ga refuse service, ele.••e.=, •anitary sew ;-sepfic syster, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. -?.,./ Signature: - Y1 -- Date Submitted: '9-1 2-II SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 • . Donna Frostholm From Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:48 PM To: 'Jenny Rotsten' -- Subject: FW: sepa final-jefferson county-adachi mla10-00155 ,.^ . Attachments: adachi dns.pdf Jenny: Final SEPA Determination for Adachi. Please forward a copy on to the applicant. I have tentatively scheduled the hearing for October 23. Please let me know at your earliest convenience if this date works for the applicant. Also, please note that the applicants do not need to be there if you (and the other consultants) are able to come; however, they are welcome at the hearing if they want to be there. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner Jefferson County DCD Original Message From: HP Copier Digital Sender [mailto:hpcopier @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:37 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: sepa final - jefferson county - adachi mla10-00155 Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 1 • • Donna Frostholm 1 1 j w ..." ;1 From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:21 PM �� "'° � - To: 'Jenny Rotsten' 77 ;. Subject: RE: Adachi Hearing Hi Jenny: Based on this, I will confirm the hearing with the Hearing Examiner. It will be at 2:00 at the Jefferson County Courthouse on October 23.. From: Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent:Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:23 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Hearing Hi Donna. Derek Adachi said that he should be able to attend the Hearing. Thanks! Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:15 AM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: RE: Adachi Hearing Hi Jenny: Just checking in to see if October 23, 2012 will work for everybody. I have not yet scheduled the hearing examiner, so please let me know at your earliest convenience. It is approximately a 5 week process for me to prepare for a hearing, and I need to issue the SEPA Threshold Determination tomorrow for an October 23, 2012 hearing. Regards, Do-w ttoi.TrathoLm' .Associate Planner/WetCctndSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend; Washington 98368 dfrosthorm@cojefferson.wa.us 1 360.379.4466 • • I Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From Jenny Rotsten [mailto:Jenny @sealevelbb.comn] Sent:Tuesday, September 11,2012 9:12 AM � % To Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Adachi Hearing Donna, Let me see if the owners and the engineers and biologists could attend a hearing on that date and get back to you. I would be happy to plan to stop in your office on 10/9 to grab the posting and take it directly to the site. Thank you for the heads up on the building permit portion. I will make sure to have things ready to submit for that once the hearing decision is provided. Best regards, Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jennv@sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:40 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: Adachi Hearing Jenny: I did not get any comments on the Adachi project during the most recent notice of application so the project can move on to the public hearing. Would you be available for a hearing on Tuesday, October 23 at 2:00? Also, would you be available to post the notice of public hearing on the property by Wednesday, October 10? Note: It is likely that you may not receive the posting packet in the mail until Monday,October 8 or Tuesday, October 9. Also, please be aware that a building permit will also be needed. In most cases, applicants do not come in with a building application until they have the decision from the hearing examiner. Please plan on submitting a building application to complete the Adachi slope stabilization permitting process. Regards, Do-vutux,Froith lives 2 Associate PCanner/WetCandSpecialis• • L(..„ 1 Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 dfrostham@co.jefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 3 • • Donna Frostholm From: Jenny Rotsten [Jenny @sealevelbb.com] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:54 AM To: Donna Frostholm ]_0 ,,:0 ] c 1 t= Subject: Re: Adachi posting packet Page /of�.._ Thank you Donna. I will be up Tuesday. Jenny Rotsten Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc PO Box 375 Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 (360) 297-2308 Fax Jenny @sealevelbb.com Please note new email address From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:17 PM To: Jenny Rotsten Subject: Adachi posting packet Jenny: If I remember correctly,you were going to come to DCD to pick up the posting packet for the Adachi public hearing on October 23. I will have the posting packet ready for pick up by Monday morning,and you need to come in to get the packet and post the notice by Wednesday,October 10. DCD is open from gam—4:30pm. Let me know if you have any questions, Dav etas Fro t310 4 / Associate PCanner/WetCandSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Deveoopment 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,'Washington 98368 dfrosthoCm@cojefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE • JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE LOG T M ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) Pare' County of Jefferson) I �h;.�� 1 , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1)public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL:A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21,2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed,the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting,the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. The notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of flc._A • ,2012. /64. Lormah—leibils ature of•erson posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this° day of OCAlaa`,2012. Acknowledgement: .• \ssior�F.!li� �; • a 'ubl• i an or the ta�� Washington, . p;F -I-b• , residing in ash1initon. � � o {- My commission expires: I- �® lLY = U O �Qr� �; m N • '°J8LIG a1 'A o .��9J�.1.3 .•Q 20�A �� \�: /i,/�FrWASN\N ��`s\ NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s):YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_HearExam_APO_U.rpt 10/5/2012 r ` JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER A) rio ,CASE NO. 5 r CERTIFICATION OF MAILING Page j _of mif I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this gm day of 0 et)h e 2012, I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed,true and correct copies of 1 v i" ,�/ (� °(,c e�✓L in the above matter, addressed to: /Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) / Agencies: See attached list. kit A/lnterested Parties: See attached list. Jj Applicant/Representative -Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction,Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. v Newspapers (Notices Only) i/ Official Posting Places (x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. EXECUTED this ql-Pday of C% , 2012 at Port Townsend, Washington. Declarant G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2012.docx 0177; TEM • 601032020: i YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE , YOKO ADACHI TRUST 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC,WA 981885313 701344050 JOHN N KAPP MARY J KAPP 783 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE,WA 983768602 701344016 DAVID J KREIMER VIRGINIA KREIMER 9307 21ST AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 981172708 701344051 MARIANNE B MAC DONALD 975 RHODODENDRON DR QUILCENE, WA 983769691 601031005 MACKENZIE DESHLER TAD CYNTHIA MACKENZIE DESHLER 533 NE 90TH ST SEATTLE, WA 981152956 601031008 WILLIAM C POWER LINDA A POWER 212 DOYEN ST BREMERTON, WA 983375503 601032021 JEFFERY S VINCENT GEORGIA A VINCENT 4584 ROCKAWAY BLUFF RD NE BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 981103708 , • • SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *PORT TOWNSEND LEADER *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS ALISON ARTHUR CHARLIE BERMANT PO BOX 552 1939 E SIMS WAY PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WA STATE DNR RUSSELL HOLIER BRIDGET KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106 5310 EAGLEMOUNT RD OLYMPIA,WA 98501 CHIMACUM,WA 98325 SDP10-00051 SDP10-00051 *WSDOH SHELFISH AND WATER PROT.-MARK TOY *WDFW PO BOX 47829 MARGIE SCHIRATO OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7284 414 BUSINESS PARK ROAD SHELTON,WA 98584 SDP10-00051 *DOE WETLANDS RICK MRAZ L4O TE PO BOX 47775 { ° OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 ,-° , • • • Jefferson County.Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 (Th,�`: i_ , POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by October 10,2012. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15)calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three(3)days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at(360)379-4450. MLA number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s): YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE II •ci • JEFFERSON COUNTY y; I ° iv NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date: April 21, 2010 Application Complete Date: June 14, 2010 Application Notice Date: October 10, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: , The ublic hearing will be conducted on Tuesday, October 23, 2012-in the First Floor Conference p g Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Tows ,M 368, (360) 379-4450. —� �J Of SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: y ° If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/. •IDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL:A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21,2010. During review of the application,a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed,the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting,the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. The notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: LU C IM the day of ,2012. tTh (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2012. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in ,Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA10-00155 Proponent(s):YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_HearExam_APO_U.rpt 10/5/2012 . • • • Donna Frostholm From: Legals Email[legals @ptleader.comj Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:05 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Publish MLA10-00155NOPH .�r L G IT �7 Donna, �.., 409.( Your legal ad request has been received and your ad(s) will publish on the date(s) stated in your email. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the ad is actually published and measured. Our estimates will give you a figure close to the actual cost. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the ad is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of your legal ad. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Thank you and have a great day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 on 10/8/12 8:16 AM, Donna Frostholm at dfrostholm@yco.jefferson.wa.us wrote: Hello Legals: Please publish the attached file, MLA10-00155NOPH, one time in the October 10, 2012 edition of The Leader, and reply to this email to confirm that it will run this Wednesday. Thanks, [Donn a.Fro thoLm' .Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend"Washington 98368 dfrostholm @co jefferson.tiva.us 360.3794466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday; DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 • . ,• III Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: October 10,2012 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 ....4_.,, ' 3 / ' -' JEFFERSON COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION MLA10-00155 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner to review 11-re ceive comments on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date:April 21,2010 Application Complete Date:June 14,2010 Application Notice Date: October 10,2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W,WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The public hearing will be conducted on Tuesday,October 23, 2012 in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and (c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 410 r JEFFERSON COUNTY ,�rt. ,, ; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , l TYPE III LAND USE APPLICATION 7 MLA10-00155 - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Hearings Examiner to review and receive comments on a Type III Land Use Application. APPLICANT: YOKO ADACHI TRUSTEE 19223 34TH AVE S SEATAC WA 981885313 Application Received Date:April 21,2010 Application Complete Date:June 14,2010 Application Notice Date:October 10, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 1253 DEER CREEK RD Parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26N, Range 1W, WM, located at 1253 Deer Creek Rd, Quilcene 98376 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: A shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was received April 21, 2010. During review of the application, a letter was submitted by the project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bulkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. PUBLIC HEARING AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The public hearing will be conducted on Tuesday,October 23,2012 in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County courthouse. The hearing will begin at or about 2:00PM. The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application; (b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and(c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division,621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368, (360)379-4450. SEPA INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION: If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance(DS)may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Project Planner: Donna Frostholm,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ III • 4SON. c JEFFERSON COUNTY 4``w `�°'a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,,:, ` 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment f Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd ar7co.iefferson.wa.us 1SNI NG�o Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning( Watershed Stewardship Resource Center LO . TFM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION # ,. STAFF REPORT --�-.�. TO Page. ..�_ c)) _ THE HEARING EXAMINER RE: Shoreline Substantial Development ) PROPOSED FINDINGS, for a Secondary Use Application ) CONCLUSIONS,AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS File No: MLA10-00155/SDP10-00015 ) Owner: Yoko Adachi 19223 34th Avenue South SeaTac,Washington 98188 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION AND RECOMMENDATION Application: e shoreline substantial development application for slope stabilization to provide long-term protection of an existing house near a steep slope along Dabob Bay was receive pri 21, 20 t0. urmg review of the app ica i o , was submittea-by he project engineer and the proposal was permitted as an emergency shoreline exemption,. The slope stabilization work proposal included installation of reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope. The geo-grid and compact fill material were layered to stabilize the slope. Logs and root wads were salvaged and added along the toe of the reinforced area. When construction was completed, the access area was re-vegetated. Work was conducted from the top of the slope; access to the project area was not from Dabob Bay. This portion of the proposal was completed above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Dabob Bay. As part of project permitting, the applicants have submitted a geotechnical report to address slope stabilization and a critical areas stewardship plan to address activities conducted within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer. A second letter was then received that had been prepared by the project engineer stating that a bu lkhead was needed at the toe of the slope for stabilization and a second emergency shoreline exemption was issued. This work was also conducted above OHWM. The current shoreline substantial development application includes all work conducted under both emergency shoreline exemptions. This application is subject to review under SEPA. Staff Comment: This application is being reviewed as a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit because it does not meet the shoreline exemption requirements specified in Jefferson County Code (JCC 18.25.090). Stabilizing upland habitats along shorelines designated as Conservancy is a Secondary Use in the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC), and requires a Type III permitting process under JCC 18.40.040(Table 8-1.Permits—Decisions). Recommendation: Approval with Conditions E • C._....i ." BACKGROUND INFORMATION .x ° o Owner/Applicant: Yoko Adachi Legal Description and Location: The subject site is legally described as parcel number 601 032 020, Section 3, Township 26 North, Range 1 West, WM, Lot 1 (N1/4) SUBJ TO EASE V500/P97, and is located at 1253 Deer Creek Road,Quilcene,Washington. Site Conditions: The parcel is bounded to the north, south, and east by rural residential lots and to the west by Dabob Bay. The entire property slopes down steeply from northeast to southwest. A single-family home is located in the southwestern portion of the property. A majority of the property is vegetated with native trees and shrubs,although some landscaping occurs in the immediate vicinity of the house. A slope failure along the access route to the house occurred during the winter of 2007/2008, which instigated a review by the property owners of site conditions, as it pertains to slope stability. Shoreline Designation: Pursuant to the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP),the on-site segment of shoreline is designated as Conservancy. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan designates the subject parcel as Rural Residential one dwelling unit per 5 acres(RR 1:5). Site Visit: Jefferson County staff conducted a site visit as part of a pre-application conference(PRE09-00034)on December 15, 2009. A second site visit was made by staff on October 5, 2010 to discuss critical areas mitigation with the project biologists and project representatives. A third site visit was made by staff on July 10, 2012 with the project representatives to review the completed project. Date of Application: A shoreline substantial development application was submitted to Jefferson County on April 21, 2010. The County did not review the application within the 28 days specified in JCC 18.40.110 to determine if the application is complete. Therefore,the application was deemed complete on May 19, 2010,and a letter was sent out on June 14, 2010 to confirm that the application was complete(Exhibit 3). State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): The proposal is subject to SEPA review because the amount of fill exceeds 500 cubic yards as specified in WAC 197-11-800(1)(c)(v)and JCC 18.30.060(5)(a). NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Proposal Noticing: Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper: • Notice of Type III Application: May 11, 2011(Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: July 11,2012(Exhibit 37) • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 10,2012(Exhibit 45) Notice was posted on the property: • Notice of Type III Application: May 9,2011 (Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEP Determination: July 10,2012(Exhibit 37) • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 9,2012 (Exhibit 45) The applicant, the project representative, the agencies, and all property owners within 300 feet were notified by mail: • Notice of Type III Application: May 10,2010(Exhibit 21) • Notice of Type III Application and Pending SEPA Determination: July 10,2012(Exhibit 37) • Notice of Public Hearing and Final SEPA Determination: October 9,2012(Exhibit 45) 2 LOG 1. . n - Public Hearing Date: October 23,2012 a .. m PUBLIC COMMENT Adjacent property owners were notified of the shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal(Exhibits 21, 37, and 45). Proposal Noticing: Public Response No comments were received from the public during notice of application. AGENCY COMMENT Agencies, including tribes,were notified of the pending shoreline application and the scheduled public hearing on the proposal(Exhibits 21, 37, and 45). Proposal Noticing: Agency Response No comments were received from agencies or tribes during the notice of application. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED • Shoreline Substantial Development Permits(SSDP)for Secondary Uses APPLICABLE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES • Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County, adopted March 7, 1989 • Jefferson County Unified Development Code, adopted December 18,2000, effective January 16,2001 • Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan,adopted August 28, 1998 PROPOSED FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following section constitutes staff findings and conclusions regarding consistency of the application with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the Jefferson County Code, and the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. Following these findings and conclusions are conditions recommended for consideration by the Hearing Examiner. Any of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations may be adopted, rejected, or modified by the Hearing Examiner based on testimony or evidence presented during the course of review. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant has stabilized a steep slope to protect an existing house on the property through two emergency shoreline exemption permits. Slope stabilization included a reinforced earth buttress and rock armor on the slope: approximately 25 cubic yards of 1-2 man rock; 1,017 cubic yards of geo-grid fill; 25 cubic yards of 2-3 man rock; and 30 cubic yards of crushed rock. Native plants have been installed along the stabilized slope and in the mitigation area. The proposal requires a shoreline substantial development permit and SEPA review. As part of the project, a critical areas stewardship plan, geotechnical report, and an engineered design plan were submitted (Exhibits 2, 13, 15, 24, and 31). This proposal also requires a building permit, and the applicant must submit a building application upon completion of the shoreline permitting process. 2. The proposed development is entirely within shoreline jurisdiction, and is subject to the critical areas regulations specified in the Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.22 JCC). This section of the Code provides for the protection of critical areas. Based on an April 14, 2010 Code Interpretation by the Jefferson County Planning Manager,this proposal is vested to regulatory requirements in place at the time the application was determined complete, and the critical areas regulations apply to this proposal. The 3 following discussion addresses critical areas that occur within the project area. The following critical areas were identified on the subject property: fish and wildlife habitat areas (federally listed species); geologically hazardous areas (unstable shoreline slope stability and moderate landslide hazard); aquifer recharge area(susceptible); and seawater intrusion protection zones(high risk). Staff Comment: The applicant submitted a critical areas stewardship plan to compensate for impacts to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer (Exhibits 13 and 31). Forested vegetation was removed to stabilize the slope and native plant species were replanted in the impact area and the adjacent mitigation area. Jefferson County noticed the application to state agencies, tribes, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, but did not receive any comments. Therefore, it is assumed that listed fish species would not be adversely affected by the proposal and that the mitigation proposed adequately compensates for the buffer impacts. A project engineer designed the plans to address stabilization of the geologically hazardous area(Exhibit 2, 15, and 24). The proposed project occurs within a susceptible aquifer recharge area and a high risk seawater intrusion protection zone (SIPZ). The type of project proposed, however, would not be expected to adversely affect the aquifer recharge area or the SIPZ. 3. Pursuant to JCC 18.30.070(Stormwater Management Standards),the proposed development must comply with the minimum standards of the 2005 Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Based on the Jefferson County Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that was submitted, the proposal is a medium project that must comply with Minimum Requirements #1 through#5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. 4. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: The proposed shoreline development is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The following Plan goals and policies apply to the proposal: a) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Goal 5.0(p. 8-24) states: "Allow development along shorelines which is compatible with the protection of natural processes, natural conditions, and natural functions of the shore environment. " Staff Comment: The proposed development has been reviewed against the Jefferson County Code, including the shoreline regulations (Chapter 18.25 JCC). As conditioned through existing Jefferson County regulations,the proposal is consistent with this policy. b) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998,Environment Policy 5.1 (p. 8-24)states: "Regulate shoreline land use activities based on the best available scientific information. " Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to resource agencies and tribes for review and comments. No comments were received. c) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998, Environment Policy 5.2 (p.8-24) states: "Protect nearby properties and the shoreline environment from the individual or cumulative effects of development that may interfere with the functions of sediment transport systems along the shoreline." Staff Comment: The proposed project will be constructed above ordinary high water mark and is intended to prevent slope failures. Therefore, the proposal is not expected to interfere with sediment transport functions. d) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998, Environmental Policy 5.6 (p.8-24): "Manage shoreline hazard areas such as unstable bluffs and erosion and coastal flood hazard areas to protect public safety and public and private property." Staff Comment: A licensed engineer prepared the plans for this project(Exhibits 2, 15, and 24). The intent of the stabilization effort was to protect the existing residential structure. e) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, 1998, Environmental Policy 5.7 (p.8-24): "Manage storm water for proposed and existing development in a manner consistent with Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington." Staff Comment: The design plans were prepared by a licensed engineer. The proposal complies with the stormwater manual and is consistent with this policy. 4 • ° . 5. Jefferson County Code: The Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.40 JCC) requires that one Public Hearing be held for each proposed project. Staff Comment: The scheduled public hearing constitutes the single hearing for this project. 6. Shoreline Master Program: The proposal is subject to the goals and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The proposed project would be constructed within a section of the shoreline designated as Conservancy. Staff Comment: The SMP applies to the proposal. In addition to being within the Conservancy shoreline designation, the proposal is subject to several other program policies and performance standards. The following sections of the SMP are specifically applicable to the proposal; additional policies and performance standards may apply: JCC 18.25.130 Conservancy JCC 18.25.190 Secondary Uses JCC 18.25.430 Shore Defense Works 7. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(1)defines areas in the Conservancy designation as: An area with valuable natural, cultural, or historical resources or environmental conditions that should be protected, conserved, and managed to the extent that a continual supply of those resources such as soil, water, timber,fish, shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted but are maintained. Master Program JCC 18.25.130(2)contains policy language applying to areas so designated: To protect, conserve, and manage existing resources and valuable historical and cultural areas in order to ensure sustained resource stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions are not subject to inappropriate uses. Staff Comment: The criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are found in WAC 173-27- 150, which requires that the proposed development be consistent with: RCW 90.58 Shoreline Management Act; WAC 173-27 Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Provisions; and the local shoreline management master program. The substantial development criteria are addressed through the .� review of the Shoreline Conditional Use permit. As conditioned through the Shoreline C tditiran Use and review under the UDC,the proposed project complies with this policy. ° ` Cee, 8. Master Program JCC 18.25.190(1)defines Secondary Uses as: Those uses that are not automatically deemed as being preferable within the scope of the definition or policy of a particular shoreline environmental designation. Master program JCC 18.25.190(2)contains criteria that states: Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for secondary uses will have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: (a) The proposal will not be contrary to the general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, nor shall it be contrary to the goals,policies, and performance standards of this master program. Staff Comment: The proposal was sent to state agencies, including Washington Department of Ecology, for review and comment. As conditioned, the proposal meets the applicable policies and performance standards of the Shoreline Master Program and is consistent with the SMA. (b) The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. Staff Comment: The proposal,as designed,will not materially interfere with the public use of public land nor will it interfere with private use of private lands. 5 • 11111L (c) The proposed project will not cause unnecessary adverse effects on the enviro"nmevt't or-other properties and will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. Staff Comment: The intent of the proposal is to stabilize a geologically hazardous area to avoid slope failure. The proposal is not expected to cause unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or other properties and it is compatible with the permitting of rural residential development in the area. 9. Master Program JCC 18.25.430(1)defines shore defense works as: Structures or modifications for the purpose of retarding shore erosion from water or current action, protecting channels and harbors from wave action, encouraging deposition of beach materials, preventing stream bank overflow and retaining uplands. They may consist of bulkheads, seawalls, dikes, revetments, breakwaters,jetties, or gabions. Master Program JCC 18.25.430(2)contains prohibited activities as follows: (a) Shore defense works on spits, hooks, bars, barrier beaches, or similar accretion terminals or accretion shore forms. Staff Comment: This section of the shoreline is not an accretion shore form. Master Program JCC 18.25.430(3)contains policies relevant to shore defense works: (a) Bulkheads and seawalls should be located and constructed in such a manner that will not result in adverse effects on nearby beaches and will minimize alterations of the natural shoreline. Staff Comment: Slope stabilization work to retain the uplands is constructed above the ordinary high water mark and is not expected to adversely affect nearby beaches or alter the natural shoreline. (b) Shore defense works should be constructed in such a way that would minimize damage to fish and shellfish habitats. Open poling construction is preferable in lieu of the solid type. Staff Comment: Slope stabilization will be conducted above ordinary high water mark and replanted with native vegetation. The notice of application was sent to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for review and comment. No comments were received and the proposal is assumed to have no negative impacts on fish and shellfish. (c) The effect of a proposed bulkhead on public access to publicly owned shorelines should be considered. Staff Comment: The requirement is not relevant as the shoreline is not publicly owned where the bulkhead has been constructed. (d) Shore defense works should be designed to blend with the surroundings and not to distract from the aesthetic qualities of the shorelines. Staff Comment: The bulkhead consists of large rocks and large downed woody material has been anchored at the toe of the slope. Native plant species have been installed in both the impact area and the mitigation area. The project does not distract from the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. (e) The construction of bulkheads should be permitted only where they provide protection to upland areas or facilities, not for the indirect purpose of creating land by filling behind the bulkhead. Landfill operations should satisfy related performance standards. Staff Comment: The bulkhead was constructed above ordinary high water mark to provide further support for stabilization of the slope. The bulkhead will not result in the creation of additional land along the shoreline. f Floating breakwaters are preferred to solid landfill types in order to maintain sand movement and fish habitats. Staff Comment: This is not applicable as floating breakwaters were not part of the completed activities along the shoreline. (g) Solid breakwaters should be constructed only where design modifications can eliminate potential detrimental effects on the movement of sand and circulation of water. 6 Staff Comment: This is not applicable as floating breakwaters were not part of the completed activities along the shoreline. (h) The restriction of the public use of the water surface as a result of breakwater construction must be recognized and must be considered in granting shoreline permits for their construction. Staff Comment: This is not applicable as floating breakwaters were not part of the completed activities along the shoreline. (i) The effect proposed jetties or groins have on sand movement must be considered. Provisions should be made to compensate for the adverse effects of the structures either by artificially transporting sand to the downdrift side on an inlet with jetties, or by artificially feeding the beaches in the case of groins. Staff Comment: This is not applicable as jetties and groins were not part of the completed activities along the shoreline. 0) Special attention should be given to the effect these structures will have on wildlife propagation and movement, and to the effects these structures will have on the aesthetic quality of the shoreline. Staff Comment: The notice of application was sent to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. No comments were received from this agency. The area of impact as well as the mitigation area were planted with native plant species so there should be relatively little impact on shoreline aesthetic quality. (k) Rip-rapping and other bank stabilization measures should be located, designed, and constructed to avoid the need for channelization and to protect the natural character of streams. Staff Comment: The bulkhead was not constructed along a stream. (1) Where flood protection measures such as dikes are planned, they should be placed landward of the stream, including associated swamps and marshes and other wetlands directly interrelated and interdependent with the stream proper. Staff Comment: The bulkhead was not constructed along a stream. (m) Flood protection measures that result in channelization should be avoided. Staff Comment: The completed shore defense works were not built along a stream and will not result in channelization. Master Program JCC 18.25.430(4)presents performance standards for shore defense works as follows: (a) Shore defense works shall be designed and constructed in a manner that causes an absolute minimum of interruption to naturally occurring shoreline processes. Staff Comment: The slope stabilization work area has been replanted and all of the work was completed above ordinary high water mark. No interruption to naturally-occurring shoreline processes has occurred as a result of this work. (b) Shore defense works shall be designed and constructed to minimize interruption of fish movements as well as marine and wildlife habitats. Staff Comment: No comments were received from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife that would indicate that fish and wildlife habitats were altered as a result of this project. Since the shore defense works would be installed above ordinary high water mark, the project is not likely to negatively affect fish movement. (c) Shore defense works shall not be used for the indirect purpose of creating landfills, unless such landfill is specifically permitted in compliance with landfill performance stands of this master program. Staff Comment: The proposal will not result in creation of additional landfill. (d) Shore defense works shall be designed and constructed to harmonize insofar as practicable with the aesthetic characteristics of the area where they are located Staff Comment: The materials used to construct the bulkhead along with the replanting native vegetation above the bulkhead match the natural environment to the extent possible. (e) Shore defense works such as dikes shall be located landward of the stream and associated swamps, backwaters, marshes,floodway and other wetlands directly interrelated and interdependent with the stream proper. 7 a , Staff Comment: This is not applicable as shore defense work was not built along `°stream: (fl Substantial development permit applications shall provide competent technical evidence that the proposed shore defense structure will performance as designed. Staff Comment: Engineered plans were submitted in support of shoreline permitting. Based on the July 10,2012 site visit,the structure appears to be performing as designed. (g) Shore defense works along rivers and streams shall not include groins or jetties or otherwise divert the direction of stream flow, unless said works have been professionally engineered and analyzed to ensure the diversion will not cause cross-stream or downstream impacts nor adversely alter the character of the river or stream. Staff Comment: This is not applicable as the constructed shore defense work was not built along a stream. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, staff recommends Approval of the Shoreline Substantial Development application. Staff found the proposal to be consistent with the applicable Code requirements and that the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit should be granted subject to the following conditions. Staff Conditions: 1. The applicant shall apply for a building permit for slope stabilization work. 2. The project shall be installed and maintained per the approved plan sheets by Aspect (Exhibit 2, 15, and 24). 3. The applicant shall adhere to all Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) requirements (if Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issues a HPA). 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposal, the applicant shall contact Margie Schirato with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at 360-427-2179 to ensure compliance with Hydraulic Project Approval requirements(if Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issues a HPA). 5. Any damage to the proposed structure shall be repaired or removed as soon as practicable. Any damage that interferes with natural shoreline functions shall be repaired as soon as practicable. 6. The applicant shall implement the approved CASP. Dated October 12,2012 Prepared by Donna Frostholm, Associate Planner and project planner for this application to Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8 • Donna Frostholm From: Gardiner, Joanne L NWS [Joanne.L.Gardiner @usace.army.mill Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 8:13 AM To: Jenny @sealevelbb.com Cc: s-adachi @comcast.net, Donna Frostholm LO d-- L Subject: Proposed work for Yoko Adachi (UNCLASSIFIED) UNCLASSIFIED 3' Caveats: NONE Ms. Rotsten, We have received information that you propose work for Yoko Adachi at 253 Deer Creek Road, Quilcene, Washington, that could potentially impact Dabob Bay, Jefferson County, Washington. 1. The project appears to be located at least partially within Dabob Bay and could therefore impact waters of the U.S. As part of Puget Sound, Dabob Bay is a navigable water of the US subject to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. A US Army Corps of Engineers permit would be required for any work in waters of the US, including Dabob Bay. 2. A complete permit application (Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application - JARPA) would be required for work in waters of the US. 3. Because the extent of the project is unknown at this time, the Corps cannot determine what type of permit process would be used (a nationwide permit or a standard individual permit (IP)). Based on the information available to us, Nationwide Permit 13: Bank Stabilization, may authorize your proposal; however, additional information is required to make this determination. Please submit a signed, paper copy of the JARPA, including project drawings to: Seattle District Corps of Engineers CENWS-OD-RG P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 If there are questions about the Corps permit process, additional information may be found on our website at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/ . Or you may contact me at 206-764-6878 or Jerry Gregory, both Corps project managers for Jefferson County. We look forward to receiving a JARPA for this proposed project. Thank you, Jo Gardiner Regulatory Project Manager Columbia River Section U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District (206) 764-6878 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 1 S • Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm _ t. ,%' Q Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:54 AMi` t� r To: 'Jenny Rotsten' Subject: FW: adachi hearing Attachments: staff report.pdf Jenny: Attached is a copy of the staff report that was sent to the hearing examiner for the Adachi hearing. I will be sending a hard copy on to Yoko Adachi today. Regards, Donna Frostholm Original Message From: HP Copier Digital Sender [mailto:hpcopier @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 9:50 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: adachi hearing Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 1 • Memo Jefferson County Department of Community.Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 983 c (360) 379-4450 z. 1// FAX (360) 379-4451:-0,„, TO FROM DATE COMMENTS •