Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP2005-00026 1 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW ' oject 'tanner: Master#MLA05-00526 Review Type Project Description I BLD05-00557 I NSFR 1% i 46 BLD05-00558 I DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU BLD05-00570. I FOOT BRIDGE, r �`1 y f,0 ' S• Address: Primar ARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 850 TALA SHORE DR 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 PORT LUDLOW WA, 98365 SEATTLE WA 981074137 t0(f 06 Project Location: Parcel Number 821 151 005 in Section 15, Township 28,Range 01 East,WM,Located at 850 Tala Shore Dr,Port Ludlow,WA 98365 Parcel Number: 821151005 S-T-R: 15-28N-01E Total Acreagf 1 Legal Description S15 T28 R1E TAX 6&TL TAX B-12 TRACT 2 OF UNREC Land Use: 9100 FERN BAY 1/17 INTEREST IN TRACT 10 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690470B School 49 Zoning: RR1:5 Parcel Number: 821151006 S-T-R: 15-28N-01E Total Acreagf 1 Legal Description S15 T28 R1E TAX 6 &TL TAX B-11 TRACT 3 OF UNREC Land Use: 9100 FERN BAY UNDIV 1/17TH INT IN TRACT 10 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690470B chool 49 Zoning: RR1:5 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION:-- -- f ------ COMMUNITY PLAN:--- UGA: '—_MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area _--- PUD:_--- [ ] Plot plan states "property line" w ji Assessor's Map(Property fin• ,. ubmitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) 461 Legal Access to Prope ilia „• _ _----_ Ni,. Parcel Tags or Scanned 11ocum-•,.AYES NO _---- -- ----- SP ESA's: Special Report __-. b NO _ Shoreline D-.1.,' ti r NO i,/ =w __ — --- EFII ( . -- ---_-- Rare Plants: — -- -- -- Seismic: NO — -- — Landslide Flood: YES :a--------- -- — — Erosion: YES et _— -- — Aquifer Recharge Ar NO v' V 5G SIPZ: none At 'sk High Risk C o--- al) ctiStonnwater site plan su• ed: Yes No— Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: _ Commercial/ Mineral Lands: YES NO Rural/ Inholding _ C[717)] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_ Land Disturbing Activity_ ESA's Stonnwater Req's: Min Req#2 • Req# thru# Min eq#1 thru#10 En_•1--ring [ AO Notice Provisions/Disclosur-• Airport - I' YES rro orest Lands` MI IOW 1 iA Landscaping Required:Y-: �. �SI P.rking Spaces R:• • ed 'I O Other • Ir Building Heigh c� UBC Stand. • N-1 Im p ervious Surfa:- coverage percentage: O�S --- — — -- -- ------ Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s)Size:— — ---- --- --- RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to7pfic&water corutrairts!Nore spedfied [ ] Setbacks: Front:— Left Side: 3"."i—Right Side:_� _Rear: — —_ Shoreline Setback:— — ----- -- ---- LSHA Setback: 3D ---- -- — [ ] Road Classification:! JLa _ : = ------ -- Road Approach: EXISTING ,,,. D • • • --- — — `' SEPA Required: .YES EXEMPT -- -- ---- `', Flood Certificate: � ------- ----- _-- sO?o [ I Existing Case(s)&Co Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN _ _ Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <Syrs=Plat�.y��i• 4ns on pla or Odinar►c Lots/Require Declaration of R e Coven No, submitt V �: P to Visit conducted YES NO Amok Aff Require Final Zoning Approva • NO tor ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Pla• -i/A YES New Parcel Tags entered i• ' ' an N/A Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 1.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 2.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 3.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 4.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 5.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 6.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 7.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 8.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 9.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 10.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Associated CASES status issued finaled description 821151005 COM03-00068 P Stormwater violations. MLA01-00553 PRJ02-00008 P Site Plan Approval Advance Determination PRE02-00006 F 8/5/2002 Variance from setbacks of Type V stream ZONO2-00009 F 9/11/2002 8/21/2003 Request for a variance from required 50-foot buffer from a Type V stream for construction of a proposed single family residence,a garage w/office&gym and a driveway.The request is to reduce the buffer to a minimum of 10-feet for the residence,garage&driveway.The request is to vary from the buffer requirements of Subsection 3.6.8 and Table 3.2 Standard Streamside Buffers of the Unified Development Code. ZON01-00064 F 11/22/2002 8/21/2003 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination MLA05-00526 BLD05-00557 P NSFR BLD05-00558 P DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU BLD05-00570 P FOOT BRIDGE OTH03-00004 F WET SEASON EVALUATION OTH03-00012 F WET SEASON EVALUATION SEP05-00290 P r . 1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY 2 Iry Berteig, Hearing Examiner 3 RE: Daniel M. Smith application ) File No. ZONO2-0009 4 for a setback variance from a ) Type V stream ) 5 ) 6 ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, 7 ) AND DECISION 8 ) 9 BACKGROUND 10 The property is located in the Tala Point area and consists of 11 two undeveloped lots overlooking Hood Canal. Although the property 12 contains 1.25 acres, it also has mapped environmental sensitive areas, 13 including Type 1 Shoreline Area; Shoreline Wetland Area, Shoreline 14 Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Slight Landslide Hazard Area; 15 Seismic Hazard Area; Bald Eagle Territory; and Osprey Nest. The Type V 16 Stream was identified during Site Plan Advance Approval Determination 17 review process. The extent of environmental sensitive areas is the 18 basis for the setback variance request. 19 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION 20 Notices: Mailed: August 16, 2002 21 Posted: August 21, 2002 22 Publication: August 21, 2002 (Peninsula Daily News) . • 23 Site Visit: September 5, 2002. 24 Open Record Hearing Date: September 5, 2002. 25 The hearing was opened on September 5, 2002 at 1:00 p.m. in the 26 Courthouse Lower Level Conference Room. After the procedures were 27 explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony was taken under 28 oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing was made. The tape 29 is maintained in the Jefferson Permit Center file. Dade:Smith Variance Pagel Findings,Conclusions ZONO2-000C9 and Decsioa 1 PARTICIPANTS: 2 Jerry Smith, Associate Planner 3 Nancy Stelow, Windermere Realty, 1220 Water St. , Port Townsend, WA 4 representing the current owner, David Smith 5 Gary Greene, purchaser, 7962 Grand Ave, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 6 Present but not testifying: 7 Betty Greene, 7962 Grand Ave, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 8 Linda Tilley, Coldwell Banker Forrest Aldrich Inc. , 2365 Sims Way 9 No other parties were present to testify. 10 The Hearing Examiner closed the public hearing at 1:50 p.m. 11 TABLE OF EXHIBITS: 12 EXHIBITS/LOG ITEMS DOCUMENT DATE 1 Staff Report together with 72 Log Items 8/23/2002 13 The following items were mailed to the Examiner before the hearing: 14 72 Staff Report Revised Copy 8/29/2002 15 73 Fax Comment from Daniel Callahan 8/28/2002 74 Fax transmittal of above to Gary Greene 8/28/2002 16 75 Fax transmittal of above to Nancy Stelow 8/28/2002 17 76 Email from Gary Greene - reply to fax 8/29/2002 The following items were presented at the open record hearing: 18 77 Affidavit of Public Notice 19 78 Fax Comment from William Fulton 9/4/2002 20 79 Fax transmittal of above to Gary Greene 9/4/2002 80 Fax transmittal of above to Nancy Stelow 9/4/2002 21 22 FINDINGS OF FACT 23 1. The Applicants are Daniel Smith (current owner) and Gary Greene 24 (purchaser) . Since Gary Greene is pursuing the variance, including 25 making the Site Plan changes; "Applicant" will refer to Gary Greene. 26 2. The request is for variances from the Jefferson County Unified 27 Development Code [UDC] to vary the requirements of Section 3. 64 28 Environmentally Sensitive Areas District, specifically §§ 3. 6.8 (Fish 29 Daniel Smith Variance Page e 2 Findings,Conclusions ZONO2-00009 and Decision 1 and Wildlife Habitat Areas) , Table 3-2 Standard Streamside Buffers and 2 §§ 3. 6.8 (g) (5) Buffers - Standard Requirements (i, ii, iii, iv, & v) . 3 The required buffer for a Type V Stream is 50 feet. The Applicant is 4 requesting that the buffer be stream r uced to 10 feet. 5 3. The subject property includes Parcels 821151005 and 821151006 in 6 the NE14 of Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W.M. 7 4. The property is designated as Rural Residential, 1 dwelling unit 8 per five acres (RR:1:5) . The Comprehensive Plan designation is Rural 9 Residential. The Shoreline Designation is Suburban. 10 5. The property contains the following Critical Areas: 11 a. Type 1 Shoreline Area; 12 b. Shoreline Wetland Area; 13 c. Shoreline Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; 14 d. Slight Landslide Hazard Area; 15 e. Seismic Hazard Area; 16 f. Bald Eagle Territory; 17 g. Osprey Nest; and 18 h. Type V Stream. 19 6. The Staff Report contains a detailed analysis of the application 20 and additional facts regarding the proposal and surrounding 21 conditions. The Examiner has reviewed the Staff Report, conducted a 22 public hearing, and now adopts the findings in the Staff Report as his 23 own Findings of Fact. 24 7. The Applicant Gary Greene testified regarding the thought process 25 that he went through in addressing the various site conditions. He 26 explained that his current home on Bainbridge Island is on high bluff 27 land, and that he has gained a respect for the potential problems with 28 building too close to such a bluff. He also expressed a desire to 29 save as many trees as possible. Davie{Smith Variance ?age 3 Findings,Conclusions ZONO2-00009 and Decision 1 REVIEW CRITERIA 2 The variance application is subject the provisions of the Jefferson 3 County UDC Section 8. 9 Variances. The following criteria apply: 4 • Section 8.9 (1) Purpose 5 • Section 8.9 (2) Scope 6 • Section 3.6.4 (h) Reasonable Economic Use Variance (1) ; 7 (i) Notice (1,2, 3, 4) ; (j) Findings (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7&8) ; and 8 (k) Conditions (1,2) (i,ii) . 9 10 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 11 1. As is often the case when several environmentally sensitive areas 12 are present within one property, there will be conflicting forces at 13 play. A number of the environmentally sensitive areas are 14 concentrated in the western portion of the property—in this case 15 working in concert to protect the eagle/osprey habitat. The 16 topography of Tala Point drops 300 feet from the center ridge to the 17 shore of Hood Canal, in about 2, 000 feet to the east. These forces of 18 nature, while enhancing habitat, add pressure to the bluff and 19 shoreline. The eastern portion of the property has limited space 20 before the bluff drops 60 or more feet to the beach. The Type V 21 Stream traverses north-south parallel with the contours of the slope, 22 which is probably why it is often dry and yet has the Type V 23 classification. The fresh ground water—below the surface—has its 24 interaction with the saltwater migrating inland. As more wells remove 25 fresh water from the aquifers, the seawater is drawn in. Here the 26 saltwater/freshwater balance becomes critical. At the same time, the 27 stability of the bluff is also critical. 28 The UDC §3.6.5.c (3) addresses the perceived saltwater intrusion 29 problem with a requirement ". . . to infiltrate all stormwater runoff, to Do=nie!Smith Variance Page 4 Findings,Conclusions ZCN02-00009 and Decision • 1 the maximum extent practicable, onsite. " Fortunately, the UDC 2 recognizes the need for practicality, because the proximity of a 60- 3 foot high bluff in a region with a history of slides reveals a serious 4 conflict. 5 The wildlife habitat to the west, the wells located in the center 6 (along with the Type V Stream) , and the saltwater intrusion potential 7 and high bluff along the east end of the property, all combine to 8 create the building limitations of the site. These are all natural 9 forces at play—none caused by the Applicants or their predecessors. 10 2. The Applicant has gone through several iterations of site plan 11 designs in order to respond to the environmental sensitive areas. 12 Since the Type V Stream was not identified until a field review, one 13 last change by the Applicant was to eliminate a proposal to use a 14 culvert to carry the stormwater. Instead, the site plan includes two 15 foot bridges connecting the parking area/garage with the house. The 16 site plans were also changed in the driveway/parking/garage area by 17 realigning the driveway to avoid taking trees. The garage building 18 became two stories to accommodate an office/gym in order to reduce the 19 total building footprint. The series of site plan changes, together 20 with testimony by the Applicant, support a conclusion that a real 21 effort was made to accommodate the environmental sensitive areas. 22 3. A review of the spaces, setbacks proposed building locations 23 supports a conclusion that there are severe constraints on the 24 property due to the environmental sensitive areas; and moreover, that 25 the final site plan is the best alternative. 26 4. Recommended Condition 15 raised questions by the Examiner in the 27 hearing. The recommended condition goes beyond the cited UDC section 28 by prioritizing alternative methods of infiltrating stormwater runoff. 29 As a practical matter, successful infiltration depends on soil and :xar:iei Smith Variance Page 5 `ir.�n 3 ;Conn i sions ZONO2-00009 and Decision • 1 geologic conditions. Many soils will not support infiltration. Other 2 soils and underlying geology will provide excessive rates of 3 infiltration, thereby allowing groundwater contamination. The proper 4 soil/geologic conditions typically are not present. While a simple 5 panacea for improving water quality (such as drainage to the 6 shoreline) , the suggested method of using drywells to enhance 7 infiltration is especially problematic near bluffs and steep slopes. 8 Stormwater pumped into the soil by hydraulic head created by drywells 9 can destabilize the bluff and steep slopes; thereby counter-acting any 10 perceived gains in water quality. Recommended Condition 15 is 11 inappropriate as written, and should be modified accordingly. 12 5. The Staff Report contains a detailed analysis within paragraphs 1 13 through 15 at pages 3 - 10 of the proposal' s consistency with the 14 applicable criteria. The Examiner has reviewed that analysis and the 15 criteria, and now accepts the analysis as his own Conclusions. The 16 Reasonable Economic Use Variance is justified. 17 , 18 DECISION 19 Based upon the testimony presented at the Open Record Hearing, a 20 site visit by the Examiner, the documents and exhibits admitted into 21 the record, and the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it 22 is hereby the decision of the Hearing Examiner that the Reasonable 23 Economic Use Variance request by Daniel Smith (current owner) and Gary 24 Greene (purchaser) is hereby GRANTED, subject to the following ' \conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of the County Building and Sewage Disposal Permit (s) , the Applicant will be required to complete, execute, 27 and record an approved Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, which 28 will consolidate each separate tract into one (1) building tract for the purpose of constructing a single-family residence 29 utilizing an individual on-site sewage disposal system. Doniei Smith`✓ariance Pa^e 6 `iniain Js,Conclusions iONO2-00009 and Decision 1 2. Prior to the issuance of the County Building and Sewage Disposal Permit (s) , the Applicant shall submit a professionally prepared 2 ati (A/&*/ Buffer Enhancement Plan to the Department of Community 3 Development for review and approval. The plan shall use native vegetation, which substantiates that an enhanced buffer will 4 improve the functional attributes for habitat and provide 5 additional protection to the adjacent stream. 6 3. Buffer distances associated with the stream shall be measured horizontally from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) as 7 determined by either the Washington State Department of Fish and 8 Wildlife, or the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, or a qualified professional with stream experience. 9 4. A building setback line of five (5) feet will be required from 10 the edge of the approved buffer area. 11 5. The stream buffer area shall be retained in it's natural 12 condition, however, minor pruning of vegetation to enhance views or provide access may be permitted as long as the function and 13 character of the buffer are not diminished. 14 6. With approval of the Habitat Management Plan submitted August 22, 15 2002, the location of the outer extent of approved buffers shall be marked in the field as follows: a) A permanent physical 16 separation along the boundary of the stream buffer shall be 17 installed and permanently maintained; b) The buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one parcel 18 or every one hundred feet (100) feet, whichever is less. The 19 signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following 20 statement: "Buffer - Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." 7. The applicant shall submit a Drainage and Erosion Control Plan I 4 for review and approval. The plan shall include a grading i� 23 component. 24 8. All trees and under-story lying outside of driveway access and 25 utility easements shall be retained (except for hazard trees) during clearing for the driveway and utilities, provided that 26 under-story damaged during approved clearing activities may be 27 pruned. 28 9. Damage to vegetation retained during initial clearing activities shall be minimized by directional felling of trees to avoid 29 critical areas and vegetation to be retained. Daniel Srniih Variance Page 7 Findings,Conclusions ZONO2-00009 and Decision • 1 10. Retained trees, under-story and stumps may subsequently be cleared only if such clearing is necessary to complete the 2 proposal involved in the project application. 3 11. For the site plan (Site Plan Advance Approval Determination - 4 SPAAD) approval on the property, the applicant shall include the boundary of the streamside buffer area on the approved Site Plan. 5 6 The applicant may also choose to dedicate the streamside buffer area through a conservation easement or deed restriction that 7 shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. The form of 8 any such instrument shall be approved by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. 9 13. Residential structures shall not exceed thirty-five feet in 10 height. 11 14 . The applicant shall follow recommendations as stated in the 12 Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Habitat Management Plan, the Buffer Enhancement Plan and the Site Plan Advance Approval 13 Determination (SPAAD) . 14 Pursuant to Unified Development Code, Section 3.6.5.c (3) , all new 1. single-family residential construction located within 500 feet of any marine shoreline is required to infiltrate storm water runoff , % 16 on-site, to the maximum extent practicable. The Drainage and 17 Erosion Control Plan required in Condition 7 above shall be used to implement this condition, provided that the use of drywells is 18 not the preferred method unless deemed safe by a licensed 19 geotechnical engineer in light of Conclusions 1 and 4 above and approved by Jefferson County. 20 21 DATED this 11th day of September 2002. 22 23 ■—:14% 24 Iry Berteig 25 Jefferson County Hearing Examiner 26 ib 27 28 29 Daniel Smith Variance Page 8 Findings,Conclusions ZONO2-00009 J and Decision p. 2 4\ brl ©S -T sa Ce r._ ,,.,Ii NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING \ 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers-Land Surveyors-Geologists T/ Construction Inspection-Materials Testing N (360)452-8491 FAX(360)452-8498 December 23, 2008 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market Street, #166 Seattle, WA 98107 Subject: Inspection of Completed Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities, Parcels 821-151-005 & 006 Greetings: As requested, personnel from our firm visited this site and inspected the completed drainage, erosion, and sediment control facilities and found them to have been constructed substantially in accordance with the plan and approved changes prepared by this office. Please contact me if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING £::: DEC 30 202 David Hanna, PE Civil Engineer ONALE 6 l2' L e 0 G P• 1 1771 fr /71 (5' /1D - - -5 (905- 5- 7 771-- g 5-Q 7-61 ) o- 4 537831 of Page:7180321 1 2 10/08/2008 02:10P Jefferson County Aud GARY GREENE COV 43.00 When recorded return to: Name: Jefferson County Public Health MLA D5-5 615 Sheridan, Port Townsend WA 98368 (fite V / 1 • DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bed Room Restriction Grantor(s): Gary and Betty Greene Grantee(s): Jefferson County NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO Gary and Betty Greene ,his/her/their successors, heirs and assigns as their interest(s)may appear, and the general public. This restrictive covenant shall bind and restrict the land, the Grantor(s),their heirs, grantees, successors and assigns and shall "run"with the land into perpetuity. DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY AFFECTED: • Lot(s) tracts 2 & 3 Block(s) Div. Of unrecorded Fern Bay Section 15 ,Township 28 ,Range 1 E WM ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 821151005 821151006 Address of Property 850 Tala Shore Dr, Port Ludlow, WA In consideration of approval by Jefferson County Public Health and/or Community Development of the following permits or applications: BLD05-557 BLD05-558 for the real property described above, Grantor(s)hereby covenant and agree as follows: C:\Documents and Settings\Iinda\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5\Bedroom Covenant 09 27 07 DA.doc Created 9/07 1 of 2 11111111537831 Page: 2 of 2 10/08/2008 02:10P Jefferson County Aud GARY GREENE COV 43.00 1. I/We recognize that the septic system serving this residence is sized to accommodate 360 gpd occasional maximum peak use. I/We further recognize that it is the purpose of this covenant to limit the number of bedrooms on this property to 3 2. I/We recognize that construction or use of additional rooms as bedrooms beyond said limit may overload the septic system and cause premature failure of the on-site sewage system. 3. I/We hereby agree not to construct, maintain, or suffer to be constructed or maintained upon said land more than one residence having more than 3 bedroom's. 4. This Declaration of Covenant has been willingly and knowingly signed by the undersigned. 5. This Declaration of Covenant shall not be released or extinguished without the express written approval of Jefferson County Public Health or its successor. Recording. Upon its execution,this Declaration of Covenant shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. All contracts and deeds or other instruments of conveyance relating to the property or any part thereof shall contain reference to this covenant. Warranty of Authority. The Grantor(s) signing below swear under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington that he/she/they are the sole Owners in fee of the real property described above and are authorized to make this Declaration of Covenant and so bind the property. GRANTOR(S) �a 1. - ( reene 7 /l.t tirt- Pbe4k.L.A 1 . Q)reeY1 e, Acknowledgment: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2- day of ZUnt.. ,200% bv, o,v, . �rs�`QlLtie 0.nd sAk%6 Rs,, 6re.erse. 1T-s� ∎ N`` \ Q ary public in and for the State of Washington, residing in J2a e, Washington. My commission expires:!-3 Ut_a©1 O ,,,r Nab t ' C:\Documents and Settings\linda\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK5\Bedroom Covenant 09 27 07 DA.doc Created 9/07 2 of 2 Page 1 of 1 A Michelle Farfan // 411 From: Linda Atkins Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:52 AM To: Michelle Farfan - Subject: bld05-00558 Michelle, I have signed off on the revised building permit application removing the ADU and just having a bathroom in the detached garage/shop. I have a revised septic plan I will be approving soon. thanks Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working fora safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. 5/8/2008 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 1:44 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: GREENE Garage Project(BLDG05-00558 MLA05-00526) Attachments: Greene Garage 2nd floor.pdf; Greene Garage •• .pdf fg Greene Garage 2nd Greene Garage 1st floor.pdf(1... floor.pdf(2... Michelle, Our Garage was originally designed and approved to contain an Auxiliary Dwelling Unit. For numerous reasons we have decided to eliminate the ADU and to simply provide for an Exercise/Office area. note in the attached floor plan that we have eliminated the private bedroom, the You will p P full kitchen, the balcony and the fireplace. There is now a very basic coffee bar. The first floor and the overall dimensions and siting of the garage have NOT changed. A few months ago I copied Community Development on a requested change to the septic system for the associated single family residence. Linda Atkins has recently informed me that she will not proceed with these septic changes until we officially eliminate the ADU. Please let me know if you require anything else to officially eliminate the ADU. Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 1 0 0 71'q H u'N Rl Dpl`t1JF-1 ,nom'„r1D ox 22,_6 ro:�jmz V tl r m� r. tri• • .'��a f Fyn _ ooy APPS © \ 1�∎�xa ztt8 0 ,: No.4 II N`6* 3 owcl w II :1I# = iI o *I o II D Il 2 D � II C) m . N z 0 ED M C.P4 M at TI o I-- . 1 A —\ s l x A at 0 ° R 0 70 XII L7J m N m m NI C, D z F? g rn I 1,1 ,��11������`� ll������ rn rnwv L J i /c 0 CI _ /' j i ./ o \ O / s Py • _ v '• � `° V�' a. /. I +.!�', • ,,ti,N�, Q .i. 22'_," ,�,m�.. 48 mayz 9b.�zz l- - m © I !g ya • , 486 �a � _' '� x al z,�°mt� x z y b 1I �' _ ° , n I tz, 11 + LJ •9 48 5 O� / D / �;+ ri.. z cps � .�- G) SLOPE 1/8":12" . • M 110 4841 1___-1 7 . � m o333 I eiS ct ; .4'0+ 11.6 • O ate 119,1 I 0 72 ea i „._______._____, . / / . 73 483 m 10 SLOPE 1/8":12" > :Ai ao ___.. , r s _,,o ,, C7 4 r '‘IN/1.r.�ip *�i1111111_' 1 :7 = 009,4110000011114.1• 1 i k f t 1 . a ° - 1 / CO�Z If a z z m 0 k"AIL \D/ k"c 00, Z c � c�° 0 igc 0 7C 7C Z m z a m m yr �ia • N co muq 0 -5a, co r?(= JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 615 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington • 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org March 3, 2008 CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED i ,� EIVE Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St. #166 Seattle, WA 98107 MAR - 3 2008 R E: 850 and 830 Tala Shore Dr., SEP05-290 and SEP07-271 n Parcel#821-151-005 and 821-151-004 JEFFERSON COUNTY DCD Dear Mr. Greene: I am sending this letter in response to your letter received January 30, 2008. You have requested changes to the approved permit under SEP05-290. These changes would require submittal of a redesign stamped by the licensed designer. Additional tankage (#of gallons of storage) and screening is required if you will be pumping from a basin as you described due to the increase in suspended solids present. Additionally you will need to submit revised floor plans on the accessory structure showing removal of the kitchen facilities to the Building Department for review. Please contact them at 379-4450 for more detail on their requirements. In reviewing this requested change and the new proposal you have made for 830 Tala Shore Dive it came to my attention that the site plans for the properties do not match. The new proposal shows the system on parcel#821-151-005 10'further to the north. I cannot approve the new proposal showing it in conflict with the existing permitted system. If you have new information that indicates the newer proposal is correct then we would need a revision of the existing permitted system to proceed. If you have further questions please contact this office at 385-9444. S :rely iolisz Linda Atkins, Environmental Health Specialist cc Je erson County Building Official ‘Michelle Farfan, Jefferson County DCD Colleen Z., Jefferson County Building Dept. Mike Deeney, Designer COMMUNITY HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES WATER QUALITY MAIN: 360-385-9400 ALWAYS WORM FORA SAFER AND MAIN: 360-385-9444 FAX: 360-385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: 360-379-4487 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano, R/f WILDLIFE (360)249-46 E Issue Date: October 12,2007 0063-1 ,OCT 18 2007 Project Expiration Date: October 01 Zlit A JEFFERSON CDIINIY DCD PERMITTE fi cap IT OR CONTRACTOR Gary Greene 2242 NW Market Street,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-220-7029 Project Name: Green Project Description: Installs _is an existing culvert on a type N stream PROVISIONS 1. The project may begin October 12, 2007 and shall be completed by October 1, 2008. 2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Greene Septic Design dated September 18, 2007, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 3. Excavation of the trench shall be across the existing culvert. The existing culvert shall not be replaced, extended or altered in any way. Any repair or replacement of the existing culvert requires a separate Hydraulic Project Approval. 4. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. 5. Excess spoils shall be disposed of so it will not re-enter the stream. 6. Every effort shall be taken during all phases of this project to ensure that sediment-laden water is not allowed to enter the stream. 7. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, or excess dirt resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 8. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 9. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Page 1 of 4 Washington Coastal Department of HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: October 12,2007 Control Number: 110063-1 Project Expiration Date: October 01,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PROJECT LOCATIONS Location #1 Tala Shore Drive WORK START: October 12, 2007 1WORK END: October 01, 2008 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 17.0000 Various Various 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91729 W 122.65412 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions This is an unnamed/unnumbered type N stream that drains into Hood Canal. From Hwy 101 in Discovery Bay 1: Start out going SOUTH on US-101 toward W UNCAS RD.2.4 miles 2:Turn SLIGHT RIGHT onto WA-104 E.9.0 miles 3: Turn LEFT onto WA-19/BEAVER VALLEY RD. 1.6 miles 4: Turn RIGHT onto OAK BAY RD. 1.1 miles 5: Turn RIGHT.0.1 miles 6: Turn RIGHT onto PARADISE BAY RD.2.6 miles 7:Turn LEFT onto TALA SHORE DR. 0.8 miles 8: End at 830 Tala Shore Dr APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically Chapter 77.55 RCW(formerly RCW 77.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local,state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.141 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal Page 2 of 4 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano WA 985 3 , Y z WILDLIFE (360)24 ' 8 `;`} ,��1 �.} Issue Date: October 12,2007 Control Number: 110063-1 OCI , 3 2i31 Project Expiration Date: October 01,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 1:1f ±�����7y such decisions. All agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions er consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that uch modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.301. APPEALS INFORMATION If you wish to appeal the issuance or denial of,or conditions provided in a Hydraulic Project Approval,there are informal and formal appeal processes available. A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021, 77.55.141, 77.55.181, and 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30 days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party,and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached, or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Technical Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal,a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties;or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act,Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. TO RCW 77.5 .021 (agricultural irrigation, TAKEN PURSUANT O C 5 C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS ( g g stock watering or bank stabilization only), 77.55.141, 77.55.181,or 77.55.241: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two- Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. Page 3 of 4 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: October 12,2007 Control Number: 110063-1 Project Expiration Date: October 01,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS results in forfeiture of all appeal rights. If there is no timely request for an appeal,the department action shall be final and unappealable. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry (28) P3 Habitat Biologist for Director Theresa Powell 360-417-1434 — WDFW CC:Jefferson Co. DCD Page 4 of 4 FINNE Transmittal To: i 1 l4 ((t 1 Q r pv1 VIA: V its pP f N� n ( y ts+ Date: oQI(r ?- ( T lnYN1W►V 1!« Pages: coJer"+ 6 Re: L r Subject: PO* 61TE N Description: ( k1( ,�el1L (')o fG Rorie of tit mow( ,� £ a';J.ce 1- �uYS -4),/ec,„ ,(14,3 ML_ Pc 5. (c3° r Signed: Chris Hawley t /�^ Copies To: File. _5�J ARCHITECTS 217 PINE STREET,12TH FLR SEATTLE, WA 98101-1520 TELEPHONE 206/467-2880 FACSIMILE 206/467-2882 E-MAIL chris @finne.com • Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:09 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil'; betty @farestart.org Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net Subject: RE: GREENE Project- MLA05-00526 Importance: High Hi Gary: I just got done meeting with the Administrator. The county will agree and approve the requested setback from the top of the bank to 40 feet. But before I can approve the site plan, the Administrator would like to see the site plan revised to reflect the location of the bank for the houses to the north and south with their applicable setbacks as you have defined below. I would say you are ok to start excavating, but if you can get me the revised site plan soon, I can approve them ASAP for you and county records. Let me know if you have questions. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 8:36 AM To: betty @farestart.org; Michelle Farfan Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Importance: High Hi Michelle, We were out at the property on Saturday, and obtained the following measurements for the houses immediately to the north and south of us. Both of these houses are with 300 feet of our proposed house location. House to the North: 33 feet from the bluff to the south corner of the concrete foundation. However there is a heated and fully finished room that extends out onto the deck. This room is only 24 feet from the bluff. House to the South: 27 feet from the bluff to the north corner of the concrete foundation. These two houses are already depicted on our site plan. They were placed on the site plan by our architect based on measurements that I took several years ago. As Betty mentioned, we also actually strung a string between the two houses, and this string line was forward of our proposed foundation. 1 You have our permission to amend our submitted site plan by adding these measurements to it. Thanks for your continuing help. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: betty @farestart.org [mailto:betty @farestart.org] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 12:20 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Greene, Gary; gfgreene @bbxmail.net Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hi Michelle, I'm trying to reach Gary because he's at the property today and can do those measurements for you. If I understand correctly, we will be allowed to adjust the setback if both homes within 300 feet of our site average 40 feet or less from the bank. Is that correct? While we will measure the foundation distances exactly, I can affirm that we pulled string lines from the corners of both properties (at the foundation corners) and those lines were well forward (water side) of our proposed siting. We'll get back to you just as soon as we have the measurements. Kind regards, Betty R. Greene, CFO FareStart 700 Virginia St. Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 267-7603 www.farestart.org "Great food . . . Better lives. " FareStart has moved to 7th & Virginia! Come visit us for lunch Monday through Friday llam - 2pm, or for Guest Chef night each Thursday! Original Message From: Michelle Farfan [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:32 AM To: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Gary: I spoke with the administrator and here is what is needed. In order to reduce the shoreline setback (not geological) to the 40 feet (the JCC requires a 1 foot setback from top of bank for every foot of bank over 10 feet in height or 1:1) , I need the actual setbacks of the existing houses that are located within 300 feet of your proposed foundation. The shoreline averaging section of the JCC may be utilized to reduce your setback from the top of the bank, but it depends on the 2 average of the two existing houses to your north and south boundary. If it turns out that the shoreline averaging will not allow for a reduced 40 foot setback, then you would need to apply for a variance which requires a public hearing with the Hearing Examiner. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:16 PM To: Greene, Gary; Michelle Farfan Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hi Michelle, I understand you are out of the office today. Could you provide an update tomorrow, and when you do hit "reply all" . That will send it to my home email and to my wife's email at work. Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:49 AM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, we are meeting with our contractor this afternoon, and I would like to be able to give him permission to start the foundation work. Any chance a decision will be made by noon or so? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message 3 From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:53 AM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully this morning. A quick question; are any trees in front of the house and bank going to be removed? Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:24 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Good Morning Michelle, I apologize for my persistence, but any word on the approval of our revised site plan? Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:20 PM To: Greene, Gary Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully by the end of this week or early next week. I will need to talk to the Planning Manager on this. I have received the NTI Geotech Addendum and revised plans. I' ll let you know as soon as I find out. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) 4 This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:18 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, Sorry to be a pest, but could you give me an estimate of when the County will complete the review our revised site plan? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:28 PM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, As previously discussed, we would like to reduce the bluff set back for our home at 850 Tala Shore Drive from 50 feet to 40 feet. On Thursday my contractor, Discovery Bay Construction, hand delivered the requested revised site plan along with an amendment to our previous Geotech prepared by NTI. We are obviously anxious to get the foundation in before the start of the rainy season which is imminent. For planning purposes, could you give me a sense of how long it will take the County to review our requested reduction? Thanks Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 5 y ,a Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 8:36 AM To: betty @farestart.org; Michelle Farfan Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net Subject: RE: GREENE Project- MLA05-00526 Importance: High Hi Michelle, We were out at the property on Saturday, and obtained the following measurements for the houses immediately to the north and south of us. Both of these houses are with 300 feet of our proposed house location. House to the North: 33 feet from the bluff to the south corner of the concrete foundation. However there is a heated and fully finished room that extends out onto the deck. This room is only 24 feet from the bluff. House to the South: 27 feet from the bluff to the north corner of the concrete foundation. These two houses are already depicted on our site plan. They were placed on the site plan by our architect based on measurements that I took several years ago. As Betty mentioned, we also actually strung a string between the two houses, and this string line was forward of our proposed foundation. You have our permission to amend our submitted site plan by adding these measurements to it. Thanks for your continuing help. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: betty @farestart.org [mailto:betty @farestart.org] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 12:20 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Greene, Gary; gfgreene @bbxmail.net Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hi Michelle, I'm trying to reach Gary because he's at the property today and can do those measurements for you. If I understand correctly, we will be allowed to adjust the setback if both homes within 300 feet of our site average 40 feet or less from the bank. Is that correct? While we will measure the foundation distances exactly, I can affirm that we pulled string lines from the corners of both properties (at the foundation corners) and those lines were well forward (water side) of our proposed siting. 1 We'll get back to you just as soon as we have the measurements. Kind regards, Betty R. Greene, CFO FareStart 700 Virginia St. Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 267-7603 www.farestart.org "Great food . . . Better lives. " FareStart has moved to 7th & Virginia! Come visit us for lunch Monday through Friday llam - 2pm, or for Guest Chef night each Thursday! Original Message From: Michelle Farfan [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:32 AM To: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Gary: I spoke with the administrator and here is what is needed. In order to reduce the shoreline setback (not geological) to the 40 feet (the JCC requires a 1 foot setback from top of bank for every foot of bank over 10 feet in height or 1:1) , I need the actual setbacks of the existing houses that are located within 300 feet of your proposed foundation. The shoreline averaging section of the JCC may be utilized to reduce your setback from the top of the bank, but it depends on the average of the two existing houses to your north and south boundary. If it turns out that the shoreline averaging will not allow for a reduced 40 foot setback, then you would need to apply for a variance which requires a public hearing with the Hearing Examiner. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:16 PM To: Greene, Gary; Michelle Farfan Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hi Michelle, I understand you are out of the office today. Could you provide an update tomorrow, and when you do hit "reply all" . That will send it to my home email and to my wife's email at work. Thanks, Gary 2 Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:49 AM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, we are meeting with our contractor this afternoon, and I would like to be able to give him permission to start the foundation work. Any chance a decision will be made by noon or so? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:53 AM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully this morning. A quick question; are any trees in front of the house and bank going to be removed? Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:24 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Good Morning Michelle, I apologize for my persistence, but any word on the approval of our revised site plan? 3 Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:20 PM To: Greene, Gary Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully by the end of this week or early next week. I will need to talk to the Planning Manager on this. I have received the NTI Geotech Addendum and revised plans. I'll let you know as soon as I find out. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:18 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, Sorry to be a pest, but could you give me an estimate of when the County will complete the review our revised site plan? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:28 PM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 4 Michelle, As previously discussed, we would like to reduce the bluff set back for our home at 850 Tala Shore Drive from 50 feet to 40 feet. On Thursday my contractor, Discovery Bay Construction, hand delivered the requested revised site plan along with an amendment to our previous Geotech prepared by NTI. We are obviously anxious to get the foundation in before the start of the rainy season which is imminent. For planning purposes, could you give me a sense of how long it will take the County to review our requested reduction? Thanks Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 5 • Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 11:32 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project- MLA05-00526 Gary: I spoke with the administrator and here is what is needed. In order to reduce the shoreline setback (not geological) to the 40 feet (the JCC requires a 1 foot setback from top of bank for every foot of bank over 10 feet in height or 1:1) , I need the actual setbacks of the existing houses that are located within 300 feet of your proposed foundation. The shoreline averaging section of the JCC may be utilized to reduce your setback from the top of the bank, but it depends on the average of the two existing houses to your north and south boundary. If it turns out that the shoreline averaging will not allow for a reduced 40 foot setback, then you would need to apply for a variance which requires a public hearing with the Hearing Examiner. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:16 PM To: Greene, Gary; Michelle Farfan Cc: gfgreene @bbxmail.net; Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hi Michelle, I understand you are out of the office today. Could you provide an update tomorrow, and when you do hit "reply all" . That will send it to my home email and to my wife' s email at work. Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:49 AM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 1 Michelle, we are meeting with our contractor this afternoon, and I would like to be able to give him permission to start the foundation work. Any chance a decision will be made by noon or so? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:53 AM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully this morning. A quick question; are any trees in front of the house and bank going to be removed? Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:24 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Good Morning Michelle, I apologize for my persistence, but any word on the approval of our revised site plan? Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 7:20 PM To: Greene, Gary Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Hopefully by the end of this week or early next week. I will need to talk to the Planning 2 Manager on this. I have received the NTI Geotech Addendum and revised plans. I'll let you know as soon as I find out. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) This document is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary or other data protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this document is prohibited. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:18 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, Sorry to be a pest, but could you give me an estimate of when the County will complete the review our revised site plan? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dms) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: Greene, Gary Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:28 PM To: 'mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us' Cc: dbcrob @olympus.net; betty @farestart.org; nils @finne.com Subject: GREENE Project - MLA05-00526 Michelle, As previously discussed, we would like to reduce the bluff set back for our home at 850 Tala Shore Drive from 50 feet to 40 feet. On Thursday my contractor, Discovery Bay Construction, hand delivered the requested revised site plan along with an amendment to our previous Geotech prepared by NTI. We are obviously anxious to get the foundation in before the start of the rainy season which is imminent. For planning purposes, could you give me a sense of how long it will take the County to review our requested reduction? Thanks Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 3 NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING - 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers-Land Surveyors-Geologists Construction Inspection-Materials Testing NT, (360)452-8491 FAX(360)452-8498 RECEIVED SEP 272007 September 20, 2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY BCD Gary Greene do Discovery Bay Construction PO Box 1410 Port Townsend, WA 98363 Subject: Geotechnical Report Addendum for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 821 151006, located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W..M., Jefferson County, WA Mr.Greene: You have requested that we amend the geotechnical report for the above referenced location completed by this office and dated November 18, 2002, to consider a building setback distance from the bluff to the proposed house of 40' rather than 50'. This amendment is desired because of building area constraints imposed on the property by the Type 5 Stream" and to allow for a more optimal siting of the home. The original 50' building setback distance was preliminary, and now that the site planning has progressed, an additional 10' is necessary. Another site visit was made to the property on September 18, 2007 in order to verify current site conditions. After observing the site and bluff at the subject property and reviewing photographs from the previous report, it was determined that the conditions have remained the same since the last site visit five years ago. We hereby revise our report and recommend a building setback distance of not less than 40' from the top edge of the bluff to the foundation of the proposed home. This - new setback distance does not alter the conclusions, recommendations, or limitations of the previous report except that the reduction in setback may result in a corresponding reduction in the economic life of the home. s , ' _ Please contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ��co A. IFR �o of W4 111 �'y / s i , / 4411. -,;, A / Robert A. Leach, P.E., MBA A4o,� 4) 13 s itt° �`4" PrincipaEngineer FSS/oNAL °� 9'-21-0- EXPIRES 12/30/2008 Bill Payton, LEG ,- 4011IN e Engineering Geologist ;$;" , -s' °mod eau ` LWiI iam C. Payton Jr.I „oi.urww�nnrir.�a .�w+....: B:\Reports\Greene Addendum Letter 15(28-1 E)0-18-07.doc D E SEP 2 7 2007 iFERSIIH COUNT DQD ,E CtICIga(A) 416 ) po3 &,x° -7S 775C- 2- L(7 shy=.,4, A-rc uooLt-tea .Cxu � ` C &co st57 SPE. of c (Fat t, 51007 /c73 cThce/i\-,� �ef l • 'Tut = 1 .0-ut.5-7%)2A \k/LIA--A, qo t/ tVnO 40 40 CP 41 . 1 . rr NTI ENGINEERING. & SURVEYING • vet 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 0 Engineers-Land Surveyors-Geologists 0 Construction Inspection-Materials resting NTI (360)452-8491 FAX(360)452-8498 0 P September20, 2007 le) CEI V ED SEP 2 7 2a°7 Gary Greene do Discovery Bay Construction tiL4 fi�0��� �CQ PO Box 1410 J Port Townsend, WA 9&363 Subject: Geotechnical Report Addendum for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range.'1 East,-W.M., Jefferson County, WA Mr. Greene: You have requested that we amend the geotechnical report for the above referenced,location completed by this office and dated November 18, 2002, to consider a building setback distance;from the bluff to the proposed house of 40' rather than 50'. This amendment is desired because of building area constraints imposed on the property by the "Type 5 Stream" and to allow for a More optimal; siting of the home. Th e original 50 building setback distance was preliminary, and now that the site planning,has progressed, an additional"1 Q' is necessary. Another site visit was made to the property on September 18,.2007 in order to verify current site conditions. After observing the site and bluff at the subject , property and reviewing photographs from the previous report, it was determined that.the conditions have remained the same since the last site visit five years ago. We hereby revise our report and recommend a building setback distance of not less than 40' from the top edge of the:bluff to the.foundation of the proposed home. This - .new setback distance does not alter the conclusions, recommendations, or limitations of the previous report except that the reduction • in setback may result in a corresponding reduction in the economic life of the i Please contact us if we may be of further assistance. - Sincerely, , NTl ENGINEERING & SURVEYING SRS A. # � of was 40 / . ,,,f, / IA * ..' A / Robert A. Leach, P.E., MBA 'Po "FC�s et° PrincipaEngineer. Fss,�IVA4 ��� 3-21-07 EXPIRES 12/30/2008 e Olt Bill Payton, LEG 9:r " - Engineering Geologist ` i , cad t 430 f william'C. Payton Jr.� 8:\Reports\Greene Addendum Letter 15(18-1E)9-18-137.doc { I ECEIVED SEP 21 2007 JU FFRSON COUNTY DCD� j ® NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ® 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 ‘`•• 0 Engineers Land Surveyors-Geologists Construction Inspection Materials'Testing NTI: (360)452-8491 FAX(360)452-8498 11 I D Septernber 20, 2007 CEP 2 7 207 Gary Greene JEFFERSON CDUNTY DCQ c/o Discovery Bay Construction PO Box 1410 Port Townsend, WA 98363 Subject: Geotechnical Report Addendum for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range,1 East, W.M., Jefferson County, WA Mr. Greene You have requested that we amend the geotechnical report for the above- referenced location completed by this office°and dated November"18, 2002, to consider a building setback distance from the bluff to the proposed house of 40' rather than50'. This amendment is desired because of building area constraints imposed on the,property by the "TyPe 5 Stream" and to allow for a more optimal siting "`of' the home. The original 50' building setback distance was preliminary, and now that the site"planning,has progressed,an additional'10' is necessary. Another site'visit was made to the property on September 18,.2007 ,in order to, verify current site "conditions. After observing the site,and bluff, at the subject property and reviewing photographs from the previous report, it was determined that,the conditions have remained the same since.the last site visit five years ago. We hereby;revise our,report and recommend a building, setback distance of not ' Iess than 40' from the top edge .of the bluff to the.foundation of the proposed home. This - ..new. setback distance does not .alter the conclusions, recommendations, or limitations of the previous report except that the reduction • in setback may result in a corresponding reduction ire the economic life of the ;home . Please contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING A. A. is i � ' i44 Robert A. "Leach;, P.E., MBA .p -4,z.ois ���P PrincipaEngineer S�°NA� q-21-07 EXPIRES . 12/30/2008 Bill Payton, LEG .�e Engineering Geologist :'+) _ 4,�� '' 0 (.14.,\ 191 /Nc1' 'a? - ea'-' - 4 '.2 $$( e4p� imilai..1.,..,,, yton ,T , . , ._ B:\Reports\Greene Addendum Letter 15(28-1E)9-18.07.doc'; I', E C1i E SEP 2 `7 .2007 JEFFERSON COIlY D.CD r NTI ENGINEERING SURVEYING 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers-Land Surveyors-geologists Construction Inspection Materials Testing NT, (360)452-8491 FAX(360)452-8498 Y : I /. ED September 20, 2007 REF 2 7 2007 II JEFFERSON COUWJY DCD Gary Greene c/o Discovery Bay Construction PO Box 1410 Port Townsend, WA 98363 Subject: Geotechnical, Report Addendum for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range,1 East, W.M., Jefferson County,WA Mr. Greene: You have requested that we amend the geotechnical report for the above- referenced location completed by this office and dated November 18, 2002, to consider a building setback distance from the bluff to the proposed house of 40' rather than 50'. This amendment is desired because of building area.constraints imposed on the property by the "Type 5 Stream" and to-allow for a more optimal siting of the home. The original 50', building setback distance as preliminary, and now that the site planning has progressed,an:additional 10' is necessary. Another site visit was made to the property on.September 18, 2007 in order to. verify current site conditions. After observing the. site and bluff, at the subject property and reviewing photographs from the prevous report, it was determined that the conditions have remained the same since the last site visit five years ago. We hereby revise our report and recommend a building setback distance of not less than 40' from the top edge of the bluff to the foundation of the proposed home.. This - new setback distance does not alter the conclusions, recommendations, or limitations of the previous report except that the reduction in setback may result in a corresponding reduction in the economic life of the home. Please contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 4� � gFSyryc ,c A ,' Robert A. "Leach, P.E., MBA o.on 1T/2 3 R o �� . . PrincipaEngineei FSsi AL �� q'-21-07 EXPIRES 12/30/2008 Bill Payton,;LEG r�, Engineering Geologist +6' �` �� ' �r' L11ti�� ,. IWil:iiam G Payton,�r.� B:\Reports\Greene"Addendum Letter 15(28-1E)8-18-07.doc 1'� c I D �SEP 2 7 2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY BCD , NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. • Z1_ A JI.S GROUP COMPANY Ilirst-- 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362. ❑ Engineers ❑Land Surveyors ❑ Geologists N71 ❑' Construction Inspection ❑Materials Testing (360)452-6491 FAX 452-8498 www.nti4u.com E-Mail:info @nti4u.com JLS GROUP, INC. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT For ITax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006 ILocated in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W.M. IJefferson County, Washington Prepared for IGARY and BETTY GREENS Prepared by NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC.' I 717 S. Peabody Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Phone 360-452-8491 Fax 360-452-8498 IE-mail info @nti4u.com I November 18, 2002 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IFor Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006 I i November 18, 2002 I Ga ry and Betty Greene 7962 Grand Ave. 1 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Subject: Geotechnical report for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, I located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W.M., Jefferson County, WA IDear Mr. and Mrs. Greene: Introduction IAt request, Bi ll Payton, geologist with Northwestern Territories Inc. (NTI) conducted a geotechnical inspection of the above referenced property on October 11, 2002. It is understood that the property is being considered for purchase and that the report will be used to satisfy the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code for Geotechnical Reports should Ithe property be purchased. It is our understanding that development plans for the property include the Iconstruction of a 2,400 square foot house about 50 feet back from the edge of the bluff (not including decks or patios) and a garage with upstairs office/gym to be located about 35 feet west of the house. 1 Site Description 1 The subject property is located on Tala Shore Drive south of Port Ludlow. The property is bounded on the north and south by developed residential property, on the west by Tala Shore Drive and on the east by a marine bluff and Hood Canal. 1 The property is heavily wooded with young to mature trees and dense underbrush. There are small hills, gullies and depressions on the property with a • stream channel running southward across the east portion of the lot. The stream channel was dry at the time of the site visit. The property generally slopes gently Itowards the east and south. The bluff at the property is also heavily vegetated with trees and brush, and no bare areas were visible. Some of the trees on the bluff face had curved trunks, 111 which suggests that minor slope creep of the surface soils is occurring. The height of the bluff was measured to be about 60 feet high with an average slope of 47 degrees from horizontal. At the time of the site visit, it appeared that recent I high tides were not reaching the toe of the bluff. However, winter high tides and storm tides probably do reach the toe of the bluff. No evidence of seeps or springs were noticed on the bluff face. • 1 2 A 12 inch culvert passes beneath Tala Shore Drive and discharges onto the property. This discharge occurs in an area designated for septic disposal and I should be redirected along Tala Shore.Dr. southerly to an existing drainage easement that leads to the shore. Removal of this water from the site will not only • aid the septic system but will also reduce the amount of water reaching the cross-property stream bed or the bluff face. Site Geology The USDA Soil Survey of Jefferson County maps the soil at the property as the Cassolary-Kitsap Complex (CkD).;This soil is described as having formed in • reworked glacial, lacustrine or marine sediments. Further descriptions classify this soil as predominantly a silty sand with some gravel with a clay seam from Iabout 23" to 38 The Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington describes the soil at the subject property I as the Vashon lodgement till (Qvt1), a compact mixture of boulders, cobbles, pebbles, sand, silt and clay, generally overlain by 1-5 feet of ablation till. The Atlas also describes this soil as being excellent for foundation stability and good I for seismic stability. The Atlas maps the slope stability of the property as Stable (S) and as Unstable (U). IVisual observations made in,one of the septic test pits revealed deposits of silty sand with gravel down to about four feet. Conclusions and Recommendations The bluff at the subject property appears grossly stable at present. The building Isetback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50 feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the structure. Marine erosion is a fact of life along most of the Puget Sound shoreline. Periodic shallow slides and occasional downed trees on the bluff should be expected in Ithe future even though the bluff is currently stable. The following recommendations should be considered with regards to development of the subject property in order to reduce negative impact to the bluff: I1. Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maintained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most beneficial. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively - natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the ' view. 2. If beach access stairs are desired, they could probably be designed and 3 constructed in order to minimize negative impact to the bluff. Disturbed I areas would need to be revegetated after construction and erosion from runoff would have to be controlled. An engineer with experience in this type of construction should be consulted. 3. Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the ' presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 4. Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios I should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightiine or into the El stream through a time release system.` These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be I significantly higher than pre-development conditions. I 5. Septic drain fields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. ' 6. All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 7. Silt fences or other sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. ' 8. An engineered drainage control plan should be developed for this property to address items 4, 6 and 7. 9. Relocate off site drainage to allow septic system development. • Based on the findings, recommendations and limitations of this report: 1. There has probably been landslide activity on the bluff face in the past. However, no evidence of recent landslide activity was noticed.The • recommended setback distance should provide for minimal landslide hazard to the proposed home. ' 2. An analysis of slop e stability indicates that the proposed osed home would not be subject to risk of landslide under normal conditions. I3. The proposal would not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties. 4. The proposal would not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. I5. The proposed homesite would be stable under normal geologic conditions. 4 ■ For further information please review the three pamphlets, which are enclosed with the original of this report, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology entitled: "Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using Vegetation", "Surface Water and Groundwater on Coastal Bluffs" and "Vegetation Management: A Guide for Puget Sound Bluff Property Owners". ° Limitations IThis report is based on a visual inspection of the existing site conditions. No scientific measurements, tests or calculations were performed.The findings and I report are limited to the normal standard of care of the industry for an investigation without benefit of scientific data and calculations. I The sole objective of this investigation has been to diagnose the geotechnical conditions at the site. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client in conjunction with the above mentioned project. It may be used by others I only with expressed written permission of the Engineer. The observations, interpretations, and conclusions herein are based on generally accepted professional engineering and geologic principles and practice. This warranty is in lieu of all others, either expressed or implied. Sincerely, NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 12) A. �Fq ++� , ' s i �� ��� , /lam/i IRobert A. Leach, P.E., MBA 4)lo F 13772 Principal Design Engineer 0,0 cisTER 44■S' ONAL ENG EXPIRES 12/30/2002 .,_ .__ or IT Bill Payton, L.E.G. N, ,.. Engineering Geologist t dtiliam C. Payton Jr. G:\Gen\Bill\Reports\GREG0202.Ialuff stability2.15(28-1 E).Tala Shore Expires 11-06-03 5 NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES,INC. A JLS GROUP COMPANY f; 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98382 l Engineers Land Surveyors Geologists 111 , Construction Inspection Materials Testing (360)452-8491 FAX 452-8498 www.nti4u.com E-Mail:info@nti4u.corn - JLS GROUP, , INC. l Alsip i I July 7, 2005 ` _r DEPT Er Gary& Betty Greene do Finne Architects 217 Pine St. Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Geotechnical Observations of Hand Dug Test Pits for Foundation Design,Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, Located in Section 15, T28N, R1 E, W.M. Jefferson.County, WA Dear Mr. & Mrs. Greene: Per our proposal letter dated April 21, 2005, we have completed the geotechnical inspection and staking of the house, garage and bridge. The location of the garage was moved to the south side of the property after the surveyors had been to the site and staked it at the north side of the property, thus the garage stakes are no longer accurate. The test pit for the garage was located approximately by pacing off of existing features shown on the site plan. Five hand-dug test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 4' using posthole diggers in the proposed location of the house, garage and bridge abutments. The test pits were very similar, with about one foot of topsoil over sandy soil. The upper two to three feet of soil contained roots and rootlets. The soil became harder at about three feet.There was some mottling of the soil suggesting seasonal perched water,and there was water at a depth of-2.4' in the garage test pit which was dug near the east side of the garage, which is an area of fill according to the site plan. The postholes were left open and stakes were placed in the holes for future reference if needed. To prepare the site to.receive foundations, we recommend stripping off vegetation,topsoil,,roots and other deleterious material. The subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition. Loose areas should be compacted to a firm unyielding condition or over-excavated and replaced with properly placed and compacted structural fill or otherwise stabilized in order to achieve the desired condition. The on site sandy soil can be used for structural fill provided that deleterious material is removed. Preparation for placement of structural fill should include the removal of vegetation, topsoil and other deleterious material under the proposed fill areas. Imported structural fill should conform to the specifications for Gravel Backfill for Foundations listed in Section 9-03.12(1) of the 2004 WSDOT Standard Specifications, or similar material subject to approval of the engineer. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not to exceed 8" thick, with each lift being compacted to at least 95% of the modified..proctor value, at 1 :. near optimum moisture content. Compaction testing should be performed in order to verify that proper compaction is being achieved. NTI can perform this service if requested. For spread and continuous footings, the recommended allowable foundation pressure for the native sandy soil is 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) at a minimum depth of 12 inches below finish grade and a minimum footing width of 12". Local codes should be checked for required footing depth for frost protection. The lateral bearing of this soil is 150 lbs. psf/ft of depth below natural grade. These values may be increased by 1/3 when considering load combinations, including wind or earthquake loads. The lateral sliding coefficient of this soil is 0.25, to be multiplied by the dead load. It is also recommended that the ground around the house be sloped to drain away from the structure. Footing drains are also recommended, but should not be connected to roof drains. Limitations This report has been prepared exclusively for your use in conjunction with the above referenced project. The report has not been prepared for use by others or for other locations. Others may use It only with the express written permission of the.Engineer. Within the limits of scope, schedule and budget, this report was prepared in general accordance with accepted professional engineering and geological principles and practices in this or similar localities at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The observations, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report were based on our visual observations of the subject property at the time of our site visit; no laboratory tests were performed. Soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between test holes and/or surface outcrops. If there is a substantial lapse of time, conditions at the site have changed or appear different than those described in this report, NTI should be contacted and retained to evaluate the changed conditions and make modifications of this report if necessary. Sincerely, ,%ki A, it NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, II .�- °' � 449 9 ti �l � _ / • - n i)J� t! - , J A�! 2. ke o 13772 O t� / Robert A. Leach, P.E:, MBA `'` � _ _ °Aes r s 1 e �c��� 7/7/5 Principal Engineer �,. - „�� rONA. EXPIRES 12/3072006 16214 ) - Bill Payton, L.E.G. Engineering Geologist "`(to 511) I 1r -7 tO G:IGen1BIII\Reports\GREG0501.test pits for foundation.15(28-1 E).Tala.Shores.doc '".�`,. ` 191 0`Y c8� 1Nli jilt G. prayton ,ir. 2 I Expires 11/06/05 fl1/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 01/15 0 : c h e FoR4n lP6146 Ft 1 Gay Gte e #os/( s ye,rliefieor c1' a'. equoskd you 5 Plan. -A ppot i7 SAe Couki no i /occt a�. fi\c„.4- in,rA died 6 Ii an (0 oR j1 Tc(nU rY 01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 02/15 Greene, Gary From; Greene, Gary Sent: Thursday,January 19,2006 11:32 AM To: 'mfarfan @co.jeffersan.wa.us' Subject: RE:GREENE Project-850 Tala Shore Drive Hi Michelle, I would like to confirm that you have received the signed copy of the Eagle Management Plan. I mailed it back on January 9th. Does the County require any additional information prior to issuing the building permit? Thanks Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.rnil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.u.s (mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.usJ Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:58 AM To: Greene, Gary F. Subject: RE: GREENE Project - 850 Tala Shore Drive Hi Gary: I. did receive the email. I check with Peter and there are two drainage plans that you. submitted on August 26, 2005. I also spoke with Stacie regarding the Hearing Examiner decision that required the grading component. She recalls your conversation and is satisifled that the grading component is not required,_ When Peter looked in the building file for the drainage plans, he also found. 2 DARPA applications (of which were never routed to me) . This is for the tightline to the beach. A fee of $294 is required for the Shoreline Exemption permit. Please submit at your earliest convenience. Additionally, the only other item that we need is the Eagle Management Plan. Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379 -4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Gr.'eene@uscg_mil (,mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil3 Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:53 AM To: Greene, Gary F. ; Michelle Farfan Cc: Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - 850 Tala Shore Drive Good Morning Michelle, Could you please confirm that you received the below email, and let us know if we need to resubmit the Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, and/or a "Grading Component". 1 it 01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 03/15 Thanks, Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard, District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary_F.Greeneguscg_mil From: Greene, Gary F. Sent! Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:04 PM To: 'Michelle Farfan' Cc: 'Betty Greene' Subject: GREENE Project - 850 Tala Shore Drive Hi Michelle, I just received your letter dated October 28, 2005 and have a couple of questions regarding the additional information that you requested. When I applied for the building permit, I provided Peter Bonyun with a Professionally Engineered "Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan" . It was prepared by David Hanna of Northwestern Territories, Inc. dated 8/22/2005. This plan includes a tight line to the beach along with proposed sediment control devices. Please let me know if this document is incomplete in some manner. If by chance it has been misplaced, I can provide you with another copy. During a 1 July 2005 conference call with Stacie Hoskins, we discussed the requirement for a "grading component"_ It was my understanding from Stacie that a Grading Plan would not be required because we are proposing less than 500 cubic yards of earth moving activity. Our existing site plan includes elev elevations rade and a,tio d I think Y ou will see that the site is relatively flat, and will not require significant grading. Could you please confirm the requirement for a grading component? If a grading component is required, could you provide me with guidance on what specifically needs to be included in this plan. Finally what specifically needs to be revised on the site plan dated August 26, 2005? t believe the proposed tight line is already depicted on this plan. Back on 26 August 2003 I sent a letter to Shelly Ament at WDFW requesting preparation of, an Eagle Management Plan. I guess she is back logged, but just last week she assured me that she will start working on our Plan. I hope to have it completed by early December. 2 01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 04/15 Please let me know what additional information is required. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX; 206-220-7073 Gary'.F.Greene@uscg.mil -mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil> 3 •01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 05/15 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN RCW 77.12.655 WAC 232-12-292 EAGLE TERRITORY: Tala Point #689 Applicant Property Gary and Betty Greene Tax Parcels#821151005 and #821151006, 2442 NW Market St.,01166 Township 28 North, Range 1 East,Section 15, Seattle, WA 98107 SE Vi of NE 1/4, Jefferson County. Pending A,ctwj Residential development: Installation of a driveway and septic system. Construction of a single- family residence and detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit. FACTORS CONSIDERED 1)Landowners goals were considered through a review of proposed site development. One site visit was conducted on the property with the landowners in 2002. They were previously notified that a Bald Eagle Management Plan would be required for the property. During the site visit recommendations were made to allow development while protecting the significant eagle habitat on the property. No finalized site development plan was reviewed during this initial meeting. The finalized site development plan was recently provided with a copy of the Master Permit Application. A few phone conversations were conducted with the landowners to review the proposed development. 2)Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through time, current surrounding habitat conditions, a review of other eagle plans developed for the territory,and the current status of the population and scientific literature concerning bald eagle habitat protection. BACKGROUND The Tala.Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory is Iocated in Jefferson County, east of Port Ludlow along the Hood Canal(Figure 1). The recent history of the Tala Point territory has been one of conversion from a semi-remote timbered peninsula to a increasingly subdivided area where a. considerable portion of the suitable bald eagle habitat has been altered by timber clearing and residential development. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)has been monitoring this territory since 1983. A total of four different nest trees have been documented in the territory(Figure 2). Nest tree#1 is located on the eastern side of Tala Point, 4000 feet south of the northern tip of the point. The nest tree is 600 feet west of the shoreline along the Hood Canal, This nest was first reported in 1983. The nest tree is a grand fir tree that was reported as • 401/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 06/15 dying. The nest produced two young in 1983 and one young in 1990. During the windstorms in December 1990,the top of the tree broke off below the multiple top. Landowners in the area reported•an osprey nested in the tree in 1989 and there appeared to be competition between the osprey and eagles for the nest site during 1990. A nest structure did exist on the broken top of Nest Tree#1. An osprey pair nested in this nest during the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons. Nest Tree#2 is located approximately 300 feet south and slightly east of Nest Tree#1. This nest was also reported in 1983. This nest was located in the top of a Douglas fir tree. A total of seven young were produced in this nest from 1984 to 1992. During the annual survey for eagle activity on April 14, 1993 the nest was no longer present in the tree. In September 1995,nearby landowners reported observing new sticks in this tree. During the April 1996 aerial survey a new nest occupied by a pair of osprey was documented in this tree. Nest Tree#3 was discovered on the western side of Tala Point during the 1993 aerial survey. This nest was located on the top of a double-topped grand fir tree which is within 100 feet of two houses which had been recently constructed. No young were produced at the nest during the 1993 nesting season. Dining the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons a single young eaglet was produced in this nest tree each year. An adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on this nest on April 13, 1996 but it was later confirmed that the eagles failed at their nesting attempt. This nest has been destroyed and there is currently only a few recant sticks remaining in the tree. The Tala Point bald eagle pair constructed Nest#4 prior to the 1997 nesting season. This nest was documented during an aerial survey conducted in April of 1997. The nest tree is located on the west side of Tala Point, approximately.7 miles northwest of the location of Nest Tree#2. This nest is located along the shoreline in a dominant broken-topped Douglas fir tree. The WDFW observed an adult bald eagle in incubation posture on this nest during the 1997 aerial survey. One young was produced at the nest during the 1997 nesting season. The WDFW documented that the bald eagle pair had failed at their nesting attempts at Nest#4 for the 1998 and 1999 nesting seasons. The eagles were confirmed nesting in Nest#4 during the 2000 nesting season. On Jun 15, 2000 it was confirmed by WDFW that one eaglet was successfully produced at the nest. During the 2001 and 2002 nesting seasons, Nest#4 was documented as the active nest. Two young were documented in the nest during the 2001 season. Due to funding constraints the WDFW was unable to conduct an aerial survey in June of 2002 so the number of young produced at the nest for this season is unknown. No aerial survey of the territory was conducted in 2003 so it is unknown if the eagle pair actively nested at Nest#4 once again. During a site visit to the area in 2003, the WDFW observed that a few new sticks were located in the tree,which previously contained Nest#3. The landowners who live on the property have reported seeing adult bald eagles occasionally at this nest tree. The nesting activity for the 2004 season is unknown. During an aerial survey conducted on April 5, 2005,an adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on.Nest#4. Two adult eagles were also observed perched on a recently repaired Nest#2. This observation confirms that there are two eagle pairs occupying the Tala Point area. The WDFW Data Systems staff has been notified to split the Tale Foint Territory into two distinct territories. The east side of the point, containing Nest#2, will be referred to the Tali Shores Bald Eagle territory in the future. Productivity surveys were not conducted this season so the number of young produced at Nest#4 is unknown. The osprey pair was observed on their nest within the Tale Shores Territory later in April so it is believed that the bald eagle pair abandoned their nesting attempt at Nest#2 for the 2005 season. B1/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 07/15 • Gary and Betty Greene own two high bank waterfront parcels of property within the documented Tali Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory(Figure 3). They purchased each.66-acre parcel on the east side of Tale Point in 2002. During the process of the feasibility study for the property they were referred to the Department of Fish and Wildlife for consultation about a Bald Eagle Management Plan. Consultation with WDFW took place prior to the actual purchase of the property. A site visit was conducted on the property. Specific conditions of the management plan were discussed in coordination with review of the proposed site development. The parcels are located southeast of the tree which contains the documented bald eagle Nest Tree#2. The nest free is approximately 384 feet from the west property line(Figure 3). The nest tree is visible from some locations of the Greene property. The lot presently contains a mix of mostly conifer trees with a small component of hardwoods. Some large mature Douglas fir and grand fir trees conifer trees are present on the property. There is fairly dense under story vegetation throughout the entire property. Important bald eagle perching habitat has been documented along the shoreline of the property. Other significant eagle habitat that exists on the property includes the buffering habitat around the nest tree and all remaining screening vegetation between the nest tree and any proposed home location. There is a documented creek that is located within the eastern portion,of the property. The landowners have obtained all required permits to construct a bridge over this creek. WDFW Habitat Biologist Jeff Davis was present during the site visit conducted in 2002 to provide recommendation for protection of the creek. The Greene property presently contains no existing structures. The landowners now intend to initiate plans for development of the property. They have submitted a Master Permit Application _ to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development and will soon be submitting for septic and building permits. They propose to install a new septic system along the western property line(Figure 4). They propose to install a driveway on the property that will initiate from Tala Shores Drive in the northwest corner of the property and will terminate at a parking area located just west of the bridge(Figure 5). The proposed driveway and septic drainfteld have been located to avoid the removal of all conifers, with the exception of one small western hemlock tree. Mr. and.Mrs. Greene are proposing to construct a 2-bedroom single-family residence on the property just east of the creek (Figure 5). The residence is located approximately 614 feet from the nest tree. They will also be constructing a detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit above this garage structure. This building is proposed for construction directly south of the parking area and is located approximately 530 feet southeast of the documented nest tree(Figure 5). The landowners and consulting engineers have proposed a site development plan that requires minimal tree removal on the property. They followed the WDFW recommendation to conduct a tree survey of the property and have situated proposed development to protect as many trees as possible on the site. Very few significant trees will need to be removed for installation of the homesite and garage. A total of 5 conifer trees will need to be removed for construction of the residence. Fortunately,only one of the larger mature conifer trees on the property, a 24-inch western red cedar, will have to be removed for the proposed development. A small alder tree is the only tree that will need to be removed for construction of the detached garage. Significant mature conifer trees along the shoreline and within the southern 1/3 of the property will be retained. The landowners intend to obtain permits for the septic system installation and construction of the garage w/ADU in the next few months. They will commence • • 01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 08/15 these development activities in the Spring/Summer of 2006. The primary residence will be constructed at a later time in the future. The intent of this plan is to allow for the proposed development of the Greene property while maintaining the long-term integrity of the documented Tale Point Bald Eagle Territory. A concern of the WDFW is the protection of the buffering habitat around the nest tree,bald eagle perching habitat,and potential alternate nest trees which exist on the property. Previous land clearing in the area may have removed valuable buffering habitat around the nest tree and known bald eagle perch trees or potential nest trees. The clearing could have also increased the risk of blow-down to the nest tree and adjacent significant habitat. Timing restrictions will be recommended to minimize disturbance during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season only if an active bald eagle nest is documented within 800 feet of the proposed development project. The planting of conifer seedlings will insure replacement trees for habitat previously removed, along with providing supplemental buffering of the nest tree and future bald eagle habitat. The landowners have exhibited a desire to protect the local eagle pair and the significant bald eagle habitat that is located on the property. CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to protect bald eagles and their habitat: 1) The proposal to install a septic system on the property, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 4). 2) The proposal to construct a driveway and a new 2-bedroom residence, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 5). 3) The proposal to construct a detached garage with an 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit,as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 5). 4) All trees shall be retained on the property except for those trees in the path of the driveway, building/garage envelope, and septic system. All trees proposed for removal on the property are shown on attached Figure 5. 5) The proposal to remove understory vegetation and selected trees within the areas proposed for development shown on Figure 5 shall be allowed. All clearing shall be in compliance with Jefferson County regulations,the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan,and the Hydraulics permit developed for the property. 6) The selective removal/trimming of understory vegetation,the selective removal of hardwood trees,and the limbing of conifer trees shall be allowed to achieve and maintain water views in the future. No more than 30%of the live crown of a conifer tree shall be removed. 7) Danger trees may be removed if trees are identified as hazardous by a professional forester or certified arborist. A written report from the forester/arborist must be submitted to the WDFW • .01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 09/15 before approval to remove the hazard trees is granted. A tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals may be removed without a report. 8) It is negnnunAM that no heavy equipment operation, clearing,tree cutting, outside home construction,or burning shall,occur during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 -August 15 of any given year. Timing restrictions shall not be required for a given year if it may be determined that the eagle pair are not actively nesting at the nest or within 800 feet of the property. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1,then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys to determine nesting status must be conducted by a qualified biologist. * Special note: The WDFW is no longer reauirinz timing restrictions but has requested that the landowner work cooperatively to minimize disturbance during the nesting season. The landowner shall contact WDFW if any heavy equipment work or outside construction activities are proposed during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season. The landowner and WDFW shall develop a plan to minimize disturbance and potential impacts to the eagles. 9) The WDFW reeppamends no discharge of firearms, fireworks, or explosives during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 - August 15 of any given year. 10) A total of two dozen(24) live conifer tree seedlings shall be established on the property. The seedlings shall be: - At least 2.0 age class. - A mix of Douglas fir,grand fir, and western red cedar. - Planted within one year of home completion. - At least 12 of the conifer seedlings shall be planted within the NW portion of the property to supplement screening of the nest from proposed development. Other seedlings shall be planted in areas determined by the landowner. • 11) No further subdivision of the property shall be allowed. JUSTIFICAJION The landowners were granted approval to develop property located within 400 feet of an identified bald eagle nest tree due to the fact that the tree containing Nest#2 is located on the adjacent property. The WDFW recognizes that the landowner be granted reasonable use of the property. The WDFW worked closely with the landowner to minimize impacts of proposed• development. The landowner has agreed to comply with recommended timing restrictions to minimize disturbance to nesting eagles. The landowner has made a diligent effort to minimize tree •01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 10/15 • removal on the property and will be planting conifer seedlings to improve screening and provide future bald eagle habitat. DURATION OF PROTECTION This plan applies to the landowner who signs the plan. If the ownership changes,the new landowner may sign the plan or. request a new one to reflect a change in land use. Since eagles return to the same traditional use areas each year, the conditions of this plan shall apply indefinitely unless a breeding territory has been unoccupied by a breeding pair of bald eagles for 5 consecutive years.If the breeding territory is unoccupied by a bald eagle pair for 5 consecutive years,then the WDFW biologist and the landowner should evaluate the continued need for protection of the bald eagle habitat. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1,then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys shall be done by a qualified wildlife biologist. Please contact the WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do not assume that the conditions of this plan no longer apply. RESEW AND AMENDMENT This plan will be subject to the following review and amendment procedures. The plan may be reviewed periodically by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)to determine whether: 1)the plan requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances;or, 2)the terms of the plan comply with applicable laws and regulations;or, 3)the parties to the plan are complying with its terms. APPEAL PROCEDURE In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292(7.1)-(7.3),the landowner may request a formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW, and the Model Rules of Procedure, Chapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed with.the Department within 20 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal request.shall clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for the appeal. COMPLIANCE • Failure to comply with this plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. However,compliance with this plan does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal,state or local laws. • This plan applies only to the proposed land use listed above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the landowner's responsibility to notify the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)of any new proposed land use activities. • -01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 11/15 Plan drafted by Shelly gent,Wildlife Biologist, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, F.O. Box 1933, Sequixn,WA. 98382. (360) 681-4276. 01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 12/15 WASHMGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH and WILDLIFE Bald Eagle Site Management Agreement On behalf of the people of the State of Washington,to which its wildlife belongs,the following agreement is hereby enacted for the purpose of protecting Bald eagles and their habitats. The Landowners and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife agree to the conservation measures described in the attached Site Management Plan. Site Name: Tala Point #689 Legal Description of proposed project: T28N,R1E,Section 15 The undersigned hereby agree to the terms of the Bald Eagle Site Management Plan. 1)/(j)anfrr Nit,. 1) Vary (304vve, 2) l Id C 2) re e- andow cr(Signature) Date Landown r(Punt) ‘7904-411--.)4.14- o? ,11/44(it 4ii' 4/46 Phone Number Address t , w,4- 7p/o7. City, State,Zip • The State of Washington,Department of Fish and Wildlife Ir /NO 6 f egional Program Manager Date i (n mss ►x. . . Wildlif iologist Date Region County Priori ty Inspected By Date .01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 13/15 1 550 R1 E R1W 45' 1460 : :: S >*� , n Lake ''''-:$;`, f �elkam 4:+3y� d' } r �a' uf r e:� i � � � �� r taF� �'?�r � ' ~7y��t, fi 4; / ,p!t P ` ,,:it i` A lu : rt> . o' 4 ,,, ail ,',N 37 l. . 4n- r,rc, f ew f � 'e 1 j ¢©^4 d i--/ :,. , a, . 1 � o .I t � j V } � r 34 y . i s•4 v� ,, y i�e Y � ^l (� � rr t -x r � 3, aYy E!yr i T J + a, � . n r .rk • y r { " 57 c < e srj [ J 44 { � �,< r a •�/I /, i� . For,M i ,.ti' ,tt U f, 1,il ` , J / Y � k1, y1 '' I?' 1 i X °K 1A G "di f}- C '„i4k,fi Z,,„•b ,:Al2 aa NI' ,I - �,j- ) a 5 ' , f•1 , Ijr .fr4 a t ' r sr,4, ry F t If7 r , 9 • r,'.c.,F tife 5t dg �y Ft! l �, Ss rj t ,ti 6ty � &iLudIawI I t t r f , .�,. # `13 f„.W 1,,,1 � �ig liur. ,,,..,tli ,,\ � 1 ti 1 4 ) a4�, ` v:�J `v f et 1 s ��!..f �,,t .n pa t '� ` �11I I1 24 F, r ,,' r r� r, s' ri irs t , ,��,l a cb wrr 9+1 ,,,, Shoe 1i � ,, .��I�I��i����� `Q 111 "{ © F `� 'aFNr�'. '' O1�3 � �' t�1:;� /11:i-* ' 1 �I ( � Fat,sjJ'r� /i "yy., t y ,� ,�,��i����u��,oi�i�111�� .411 .-16-r 1 r�� L y. . � ��� c , Ir 1,i1 �� w �`�+i% �'`��r`oa �»•.x,��f t.; }�e ��{{t,r 1 1 4 �i 1 f 4'"�r • 1`[S' ;tr.tfs {4 i '�✓ •'Af sYs'. <<'i � �A v ,r zi s_ r 5'"y /f 'F,�iC'•`' .ld�'L4YA r"r, lr ` L� + C1 E+.�11 iar.MCP _,4 i 11,7111111/11111[114!(11 1 a . M 4� .. f r s. 11 d j 1 1 I OL" 1 y a V1 t a J° �Y '� l�i ` 1 ' Ldne �� 1 (-,,,..,-,c),,, j'S N \ k J.c f[ tr :iirt.',.' :}•As'i / •t:.f.•,7411 .4 riff i'',2„ '., j„ qw5.1, 7 ,,,,,,,,,i — t 7P„,,,,,,. , ,-..,' . .', •,'--;'..,/-12, '-`.t.cli'' PP. — i p y{ i .A,,,.. IP, 4 111E,__ All � ++fir �, I 41 16 I �.�4�r n fie. _ '�R f r ��'��'.�7�:�� ',.` +7„4i,'{ W� ' `> thvi / rH � R �Y+ i 1 y' 1 ` aII 1 A7lfler +1 f .,,,,,,1y`' Ill r�r;•tii7 > .E;,)4”, �'M.•,r"lf”�o-a •..;,t r "il. �r• I�_ T� �r7 f,�� j FIGURE 1. The location of the Tala Point Raid Eagle Nesting Territory i 11 Jefferson County "'� .r..�;r.rr11141f r -, rionsrtr nm • is m Rt t r "'r 1 rl1 for v/� ,�r.''r1$ 4r r,1�W�C ,L MH ., -01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 14/15 • MUM s JEFFERSON BOUNTY AR Nt T MUNROE AitAR PO 79 AS • MGR GOAD 4712288 pale'LUDLOW TALA POINT BALD EAGLETERRI'TORY(OCCURRENCE 689) • OTIE71 SITS.0F P 1)SHOWN RIR_CE SEE REVERSE Pan A AILAKE HIBIDRY. COMPARE THIS MAP TO YOUR PERSONAL/REGIONAL FIELD MAP AND REPORT INCONSISTENCIES -- jr 52E000 E 626000 E • .• >n. r i .. year- .3p.,p.• a`vr' .t:•.i-44,.`� -;r'..4.F•'' ley !..... .;:. •{rt . f 'M1 Y ��r�e 1'+ F,: i' � 1• a�.�h.�•?iirej,:•r �• r ��7 j ...,� r 1 1 .f: I Y '. .: I n � - .pa:44t :z. �.. � Jrfii':�,r r .. - (',, J.�L..,pV. , .`�•.' .. N• i 1tl:;c:'r: ^'•4, .i.f Ni'4 Ii` :r r' �;i:7,1•4 1 `1: oaf•..F. r ,'.:' ui.t . .r'..!' ...'.. 'W.1..C'•t'I'. v r ;s{ d j- 41 e. �, �n . `y'y''.'t r � r...„,..i.,,,,,-,...,?,.4., .T : •` Fj;zt :.•�� S�RS�•I�, ! kPF•iC.. .jl+,I.,'_� a", .r r4 7�2� r;�,�.` { y, �' r Sr j5$Y•Ie � t ,;.. , , '•�+µd1;-1 .rr, at' Y6:' :.1 t I.' I t7 1t 1, { ;;it_ ,71.et:it ' Lig i ..I 1 d.R.R y ' •��d+i rid el I (I rF r L'"� ,. a I: r ja h,:L"rl'•� ' ;"tt P-1' •: :LJ.r if` .;13401•;.;�11 '�yr'4'jr S . ie 1 � "' fi 'i',Z�'�1 l:,�Il1t�11 ll•f� r •- ,3 c gi, i� �#..`�'' "`�]I,•alp AVIV430 '� 1 Mat +,I • somas N•4 ;nili-•iii�q�Q!;Jr� �} 11 �.s,i s41 If ii t` ., ;,iri.. zR. „.. .1: • - r4, ; .'i:.17r,',414Si• T: HALE Nam t k k a 4 L �� � 1. �...[[[ { , ic..,-,r,i.1.a.:1 , .1<:11-', ' ''lif' ' 1/14-- . -i:0711:'.1.7.:-,,,-44 4 ? ¢� ' - 1 . �. 4,: , ,,r , D,, ` —}.Y ,w d t w i �yt y n' j1 �r t4 r i.N �„. ? } S I I E y , ir' grf t. • ii ' I t~ 'i 1"r • r 41171°1' .- I”' i�-•' ' i f h l a i°f Mho p T . •my.�fl' i . v r•NW. ��Mi 11'04:1 { lL '. r •1 k -�dRro sr� I Y" fr w 1AHA e�-1 d t . I ii.f I�� } k. tl }�: i9i j If i 7 �4 1.4;� .� ;.1;i T PAHA2 ,,;,,/,,-,1;-,,j RAE 1,,_::H`1 1 i I. r* - _ :qt-,11,' l � Cf " 'i�,�l,11.., . ti 7000 N o sop loco MAP SCALE 1;12,00o MAP BTAT*PLA11E eOIfif DA1UM Mow cows row UTMZONE leT J M J AAA NEI LOCATIONS OR CORRECTING OLD LOCATiOPW,PLEAS MARX TO OCALE FEET 1 F YOD ARE U8 A aPS UNIT wfrHTHI9t MAP.BET DIE DATUM TO NAD27 coNU • • . 'SOLID TEM SHOWS PRO HAUFTAT POLYGON.POLYGON EXTENDS OUTSIDE DISPLAYED MAPE(TENT. 009'•2 TALA POINT '128NR01ES16 BALD EAGLE LAST OCC OCCUPIED:1099002s MIENT,s.WDFW OCC DOUG FIR JUST OF Loom-Ebel ENDS ON W80t OFLRO RAT-TOPPED 47 ES it 122 39211' UTLI E2so01 E 5007189 N ING.1000-NEST PARnALL-,YYBpt1ANN�-I OUT. GRAVEL HD AND RECENT"94 795144'1224W40 0610 WOW'0 p�{ pp� ypE lSOWNSiSIDE0�1♦ �'y C� TH4 NCy4YW 525380 EF,6062681 NIC�Ip�r&r 068(7ALA 12� 10819 K5 6807OD9 Rs o__�['�q T M TOP OW SIDE)of BROKEN-TOPPED,FLAT-TOPPED L1Vr T1oiIQ- PAHA 928 TALA NNW OsPREbi' TORY • FIGURE 2. The location of the Toll* Point bold eagle nest ti' . -01/26/2006 12:57 2062207073 CGD13 PAGE 15/15 Figure 3 45-e* To Wiersrt) • ezim tou "ro ALL. R LIMOOVAI ,, �. t �T .416 • Q Za� e, /4 Ler 49 ......._^........r a .-.r-■■e td 444J I• nor ,4„f - J `• 1 1 ��� i - 'Y CALlAalaJ --4----r�Ram araAr, Len- 4 - ,y .----�.-�-,. ` { Grp KAu11V c'r - - `�` .... —� a _ y r�'c n�c: t lad • --___ . 4 r G LaT C — I L°r c 44 NEST 3G 1r/(FI 1 �C]ir ..�.., LOT TREE +� �p -�-�"~" �_---....." . FIA�Atz� o i Lar ni 32' 2- 12"1'IE.�xy 1l +- -�...�.�• L,Q7' Mb Pcrr ..-- _., k�t'11t ;y-•d� .. r4 r 4 '`,. ,�,. F GREED ti M `r 7 < �1,„,,64,/ ;` p . PROPERTY ti ;. . -- , 1 .'• ... mow'--.�✓. ��.. 6AZ rut-6A t OT t'_,}1' • r_.�,r.,�� ALL t tea'won • • , " Mb Veatt.E gar � n� vAr�o , It ' 1 7z" • e. . kJaDV►J -N t 1 "� O. wvawj�1/ floc col (;24te.rtAdkE 1 sue) FIGURE 3. The location of the Greene property within the Tala Point Bald Eagle. Territory and the location of bald eagle Nest Tree#2. �• 1111#1uIi111111i11i11111111111111U1L r ' `\ f" ilIiIliiiiiiu$IIiiiiii111111 111111111,,1. \ „,, NIMIMI°914 1 1A11y111111ERIMana! '��■ i ri r"gri - - :• 1 rr.•rlli.hun111IIIIIIturr..i.•a!" 0 �' I ` , •unionnaISIismo * u*,u,\7. 0 Cr\ r\\ rrnn V' s ?949 bore ri■ ■ CO m i pan_ ql.ti o �,� _ / p 1 Vt` — 55 ll a- �. y� \ \ VciU ` }� 111 11 III �- .111 \ , �/�/ ...4. III 111 'III • \ >< r _ O�p�O/\\ • .n 11 ulmncnl m.ln l_1' $ 0 .. L --,..1 ,,. t /� V ��j\�AAGAAj� -'-a 1 In ul nnrr-11n \ gyp' ( - '+ �,�\/,\\/,� -111,gL' 11 11 iss. \ 4,,,,o,-y i 1 - 1 oli ' tall 111 Al 4 41 7 imp in 1.111-5 zip'!:,:g . t_, AI■V , -, 11 1 cAll 11 r !Id .iii.:!,-, „.,, r• g w4 ISP3 AS 1 �� it 1 II 1 �., •r r / oils 41 1 1-1\ A j ,1 1 _-,-,,,,.?-F11,,,. ' - , 11' -il° e 2 . mt la 1 e ,›,% i , . 361 11 r i im ii 1 0, I I, t / V A 000111 ' 11 /..„ s , . IV, i losli II'',-''''' i''' . i 1 • .2` w.• .. 8 _1 ii :I !I !;1 I po ! N I ; yr'/• ,S' \\ - L' g a g ` *�+ i� I y i •ti 0-''' ,, _ \ is, V M z , 1 L ,140.14. pik,`-,--44k‘liti tiiiri - i 11 I 1 1 i fil i \ ill /Ilk Karr \l‘ Psmq■iMkt .01111h11171111°\1114- flitk (c.:* 10*■--. „. 1 . IN , ,, Re _ , r . . - kTi .. ip„..,41 ill% % slAWAIIIIIIII•10,411--::.;:' 1 / mipp . i X42 ! �t - m 1 ,o,ly.. .'...;;;AVeik-:',,F*;` rZ•' 0 --- (..-; / g �€-. / 6 ,, !o ry rri , ict, !f t. {A AAA V A A . 1-, !::::::: :::,, ,,, ...1.r.),,, ,,:vit. lif .,...,,,„,,,..„..,,,„,‘,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,„ ...., \ _ , „,...,..„„ ,,,...„..,.:„.„.„,,..., . . 4 -_,.,..,- ‘.‘‘.:\-,,„-s.s.,,,,,-,::-,,s,,,,-.;;-‘, ‘,;:-..,,,,.. .,--,.‘,-;k: \ ----.--11.__ 1 t K‘,,'‘.''ION'■V.Z.'..,4-,1'..,:lo,i;,.:‘ ,::, v4v.w:-.‘,,,:,‘,..,,,, , $,,,k am° II \\� A `e��A ;A\ V � �\ �� � AAA A\\V�������������� A\\\\\ \ ;0:.. ��\.������0�����`, ` �� AVM \O\V`\\������ a i M 9 lg ri I ��~ x.srL.._. �n p o l l ! �� ,- 0 1 — ...r) .. .:. :. ="- w;,, k ,s,,, -,:,!‘')4:V-‘,w --, : :‘‘',; :-.. \ —: 1 _ �. �.. � � iii 1 1 ag g — 1 ,. 1 _ i tf1 a Pj•� AS I .j--wIt'.\ v 2 l t_. � � CA Re -0 Ai> :. N / g � -. \ 70, srk 4-.94,-,-;;„_ ,, 1 "-v' O N . J l ® X \ - / m , ,-3 it / ...,,, _` / q 7) 33 fm �1T eCG'� -' - N W .r- r r a' C/2 f/)lk- ai o _J.:b o4 a _0-......_.__i__ N 1 \ • .w` G•a i 1 3 b !�Z 73 m _ o c. Tm sv • b n N 'G O PS I I I I Lci o tl 5 11 x t.y 1 ,, t d r z$ .> '- 1 r 1 I IIIF � O_ 1 1 I I Michelle Farfan To: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: amentkma @dfw.wa.gov; BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Project-Tala Shores Hi Gary: This department concurs with WDFW and your proposal at stated below in this email. Thank you for keeping us informed. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:33 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: amentkma @dfw.wa.gov; BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: GREENE Project - Tala Shores Michelle, The attached letter went into the mail today. I promise this is the last change! Please disregard the two previous versions of this letter. They are both in error. Last night, while reviewing my notes, i realized that we actually lost FOUR trees during the last round of winter storms. The letter and site plan have been revised to document the FOUR trees that have been blown down, and the THREE trees that are considered danger trees. We have retained the services of Mr. Richard Hefley to conduct an assessment of the danger trees at a cost of $300 +/- dollars. I guess $300 is simply a drop in the bucket, considering what we already have invested in this property! Thanks for your patience on this matter. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 1 • Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St, #166 Seattle, WA 98107 February 14,2007 Michelle Farfan Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms. Farfan: Please disregard my letters of February 12th and 13th 2007 on the same topic. They were in error. I would like to make three changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated February 114,2007 I request permission to remove three trees that pose a significant hazard to our garage and parking area; 1. Remove tree#6. Tree#6,a 34"hemlock, has lost 90%of its needles and is dying. 2. Remove tree#9. As reported in my letter of June 19,2006 the top 1/3 of tree#9 was snapped off during the winter storms of 2005-2006 and will eventually die. 3. Remove a 18"diameter white fir tree that is leaning approximately 35 degrees and remains standing only because it is wedged into the canopy of the adjacent tree. This tree is located along our driveway at the entrance to our property. Dying trees#6 and#9 pose a significant threat to our garage and parking area. The leaning tree poses a threat to our driveway and our neighbors'property. The"danger"trees are marked with a pink dot. As required by our eagle management plan,we will retain a certified arborist/professional forester to provide a written evaluation of these trees. Also,please note that four trees were up-rooted and overturned during the severe wind storms that occurred during December 2006:a 36"white fir located in the septic field,a 24"white fir located at the entrance to our property,a 36"white fir located near perk hole#5,and tree#7 located immediately above our parking area. I have marked the approximate location of these up-rooted trees on the site plan with a green dot with an"X". I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Garv.F.Greene@uscq.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, 1.1a,) Gree a Copy: Shelley Ament, WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife I .=i w a t+ O .. - 8 5 a maaw 1 Nk1 1 gli �G 1 ...:Z i9' Li'. fax y y i O d' -----_-_-- o Y _ 6:. ''' zU ul g I: u M t,l; MI ,.A --.----==, i 1.44:_i_rc.72,.._8:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:\ '8g0 l' gi 1 _ ® I 1- ��+ + ' - I .W X _® §I n T NE AL I i N4141. 074111P A 1.61111" I :4_,4....-_,,, RS )111), _ — � N `nom\ s� w < 11 o 0 4 f✓"::411::::,y �a i vu 1 .:.- i ii:1 g i frilluThWii i \te,/ 14 . N ,_ \ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \�\ \ 8 -\ o -- /f V\V v v yAv AvAvv vv�Av , !R i��\vA AVA \wA r1�Y�'r Vy VA \ w i W -v�Av�VvvA�A�ti �y� OttvA.t f , \A it / z x U �� i vAVA\v \A g w th cV 15- `Mt' kFy',,,� sz ....,, , _ / ---i 1 �ir i .tin r Fv� s A lilt ill 1_ i ! o ; �3 � I �� ���" ��n°P \� ■ \ r,.. wpi i L. 111E o 3 i; @'i :: \\ g q µ�, S—F— p �y j \y // 4 \ sh...� }a � l � b d alb 2 / 3 :iii \\\\\ d , i t g g �3 5 $i J9 §\m / 1! 1g- $ ca ��.�1 .�. \ � :.� _--- __��/- '• 3� H _=e :41 ICI 1 r° r1- ii t3S 3 III 34 �.'' W E . a2 : a _- I N -(/) — E.—'-- * 1 ' :*, ',.", e;101,iiti is'tC4 „‘''''\ ::9' III .4 ..3'72) .i... / ` \,- Mf "r1 I �o ° 1 loo O -L I I —F CM 00/1 01 a Pi (, I H 4 't�- t ti'gg 1 . a1♦>sas `.1 g p 1eN W' 0 nS$ O7S&ft, 3,/Z�aazN., ��� C 1_ Q It 6 a9 \` t� P "A A Q >. ox •■... Page 1 of 2 • Michelle Farfan From: Shelly Ament[amentkma @DFW.WA.GOV] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 2:31 PM To: amentkma @dfw.wa.gov; Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: Michelle Farfan; BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: Re: FW: TREE RISK ASSESSMENT-Greene Residence Gary, Yes I'm working today. Lots of loose ends to finish before I start my vacation. I have reviewed the report submitted by Richard Hefley. He did an excellent job of the including what in I the red in nt report for the danger trees. It is truly unfortunate that the trees have deteriorated and suffered windstrorms. s. This Based on the conclusions of the arborist report, the WDFW s may beaemoved.tI have cc'dhMichellegFarfanea copy e-mail will serve as official notification from WDFW that trees of this e-mail. If you can top and retain any as snags for tI would wildlife I like you to complete lthe tree r removal pleased to as see that you intend to conduct the tree removal next possible to minimize disturbance to eagles and osprey in the area. Thanks for the report and good luck with the project. Sincerely, Shelly Ament WDFW Wildlife Biologist >>> "Greene, Gary" <Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil> 02/16/2007 2:19 PM >>> Shelley, Request permission to remove the Five Danger Trees identified by Mr. Hefley in the attached report. Mr. Hefley is a certified arborist. I will forward you a color copy of the final report once I re eiv next week.wanted to get this to you prior to your departure on vacation. I'm hoping to get these trees removed We apologize for not make this request in a more timely manner. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary•F.GreeneC�ue Original Message From: rkhefley@olypen com [mailtorkhefle of en.comn 2/20/2007 A Page 2 of 2 • • Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:49 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: TREE RISK ASSESSMENT- Greene Residence 2/20/2007 l Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:19 PM To: amentkma @dfw.wa.gov Cc: Michelle Farfan; BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: FW: TREE RISK ASSESSMENT-Greene Residence Importance: High TREE RISK ;ESSMENT-Greene Shelley, Request permission to remove the Five Danger Trees identified y Mr. Hefley in the attached report. Mr. Hefley is a certified arborist. I will forward you a color copy of the final report once I receive it, but wanted to get this to you prior to your departure on vacation. I'm hoping to get these trees removed within the next week. We apologize for not make this request in a more timely manner. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: rkhefley @olypen.com [mailto:rkhefley @olypen.com] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:49 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: TREE RISK ASSESSMENT- Greene Residence 1 • TREE RISK ASSESSMENT Greene Residence 850 Tala Shore Drive Port Ludlow WA 98365 Author: Richard R Hefley Consulting Arborist ISA#PN-0784A OBJECTIVES: Examine trees located at 850 Tala Shore Drive. Assess trees for risk by determining their present condition. Assess trees for risk by estimating future construction impacts on the trees. Make recommendations for future planting and maintenance of the property. BACKGROUND: I was contacted by Mr. Greene via e-mail on 2/13. He stated he had several diseased and/or damaged trees on the property, and was required to provide a written report assessing their condition and making recommendations for action. Many of the trees on the property were previously surveyed, located and numbered on the Greene's architectural plans. DISCLAIMER: A visual inspection cannot ensure that a tree will not fail. Conditions such as internal stress cracks or root rot pathogens may be present without any visible sign. Furthermore, heavy rains followed by high winds can fell even the healthiest tree. METHODS: I assess conifer trees for risk by first examining the foliage for: 1. Foliage density—stressed trees are thinner than normal. 2. Foliage color— Stressed foliage is often lighter in color. 3. Cones—Stressed trees often produce an inordinate number of cones that remain on the tree. 4. Epicormic growth— Stressed trees produce small twiggy growth on the trunk and limbs. 5. Structurally unsound wood—multiple leaders or branches emanating from a single point,broken branches, limbs growing at a tight angle that could cause tree bark to be included in the angle of growth, and other anomalies. 6. Evidence of rot- fungal growths, cracks, holes, swelling beneath the bark, excessive sap bleeding. 1 I examine the trunk for the presence of conks (mushrooms), indications of rot, and leaning. I strike the trunk with a mallet to listen for sounds of hollow or pithy wood. I examine the ground at the base of the tree for evidence of root decay or buckling ground which could indicate entire failure of the tree. If one or more of the preceding are suspected, I take a core sample of the wood using a 1/8" increment borer to examine the interior wood. Trees to be removed or converted to habitat snags have been marked with Lime-Green flagging tape. OBSERVATIONS: General: The Greene property is mostly inhabited by Abies grandis (Grand Fir) approx. 80 years old. There are also scattered stands of Thuja plicata(Western Red Cedar), Tsuga heterophylla(Western Hemlock), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas Fir) and Alnus rubra (Red Alder). The recent windstorm in December 06 has caused significant damage to the Grand Firs. Four large trees have been uprooted, and a fifth is leaning at approx. a 45 degree angle, supported only by another smaller tree. Specific: Un-surveyed Tree#1 (leaning) is a Grand Fir located at the edge of the drain field on the architectural plans. It is approx. 20" in diameter(this was estimated from a distance). The recent windstorms have uprooted the tree and it is only being held upright by resting on a smaller tree. The tree will eventually fall across the driveway of the Green's. TREE#1 Uprooted tree supported by smaller adjacent tree. ' Recommend immediate Un-surveyed Tree #2 is a Grand Fir located in the . ; + Drain field area close to Perc. Hole#3. The tree is approx. 70' high. The top half is dead. ' ' ."' •.x, BAs • " ' 6?s. prA b .y"+ There are a few living branches lower down, but this • tree is almost completely dead. In this condition ,: there is a possibility the tree could strike the � ` garage once it is constructed, as well as cause i. a ,� significant damage to the drain field. ' � . Un-surveyed Tree #2 ' '` E j 4 ty Almost completely dead tree with thre tit it,, 0 iii*lo leaders in the top. ; ' =e,,,,:';,, # �'�i" / Failure could ossibl damage garage or , r drain field. p y Y` a it Ifft Un-surveyed#2 + ' ' —',, , A ,k$4., 4. oil,-,,, , ,,,, f# A '•q ' 1 :a i , /r . t TREE#6 s,r + ��� Western Hemlock(Tsuga heterophylla) is located on the architectural drawings.•' .,., tt ` �..S`ai§ '"�w iC r S - <�,�-.; r ;�� The Live Crown Ratio,the amount of live limbs " ��' „2„=„,t , �' expressed as a ratio of total trunk length, is s � ?. approx. 15%, which is the minimum amount for �� a conifer to be considered acceptable. � _ . " � The tree canopy density is approx. 20% of { . � _ normal. ` � , "" Soundings with a mallet indicate possible -- hollows or pithy wood in the lower trunk. �' A core sam le indicated 3" of rot in the outer p �, � wood followed by bands of rot and clear wood �`� '� "` �,; „...us,�� � �:, � � � � �� beyond that point. �i ' �: ® ��: This hemlock is located approx. 10' from a 1. '� ,. - ' driveway, and 10' from a large uprooted Gran d ♦ S a .m to \,... a Fir. Both of these factors could weaken the root ` ug` ' ��v * �? � wr� � r structure. °' � ` This tree measures 34” in diameter, and is within A strikin distances of the future location of the• house and garage. r>'` 4 F-<--�E—�<--Tree #6 zt .� � , , .. 3 • Tree #32 Tree #32 is a Grand Fir (Abies grandis), located between '; ,' � ` �' - the future home site and the bluff. *° The Live Crown Ratio is approx. 60% (very good)but the d ` = try 6 '' .'' ' crown density is about 75%of normal. There are several � ;. , M �, large dead branches scattered throughout the canopy. .,; . `_ -.:,..14:-.1_, ,. },+°r�"" F'�- am, b.' There is a visible wound at the base of the tree which r `' E ,� #;° �, " ' w indicates interior decay. �" Soundings with a mallet also indicated the possibility of y interior decay. A core sample showed 3" of pithy wood. The borer would � � } �° not drill deeper than 3", which is usually because the interior wood is too structurally unsound for the spiral drill .� ' bit to `grip' (it is like trying to drill through styrofoam, there . �, ° ` is nothing to pull the bit in). .. The tree has a corrected lean. . The tree is located in an area which is highly likely to cause .. = � it to strike the house during our common south-easterly °` = winter wind storms. #• , ' om a � - a .w Y s' 'E t � .': , M--Tree #32 -4-> --÷-4-�-4-�-�-�� TREE#9 k � , f ttU Y ro l'; Tree #9 is a Western Hemlock (Tsuga "`'''` `�` heterophylla) which is located on the architectural ..:IttktbN. .*,P : "'"' if 4% ba ■ plans adjacent to the site of the garage. It is currently a 20' tall snag, with many conks isi visible in the lower trunk. �`.' 1„ x � -�� ..ter. �- � r. It measures 24" in diameter. t' It is large and close enough to cause significant 4 f o, n , P. damage to the garage. z No photo is included of Tree#9 4 RECOMMENDATIONS: Un-surveyed Tree#1 should be removed. It has been uprooted and will certainly fall onto the driveway soon. Un-surveyed Tree #2 should be removed. It will soon be completely dead, and at its present height may cause damage to the garage, or the drain-field if a large limb or top snaps out and strikes it. Tree#6 should be removed. This hemlock has been decaying for many years, the canopy is a fraction of the density it should have, and it will become more stressed as construction begins. There is a driveway encroaching on almost half of its root system, while another significant portion of its root system has been impacted by the uprooting of a Grand Fir close by. This tree is in striking distance of both the residence, the garage, and other outbuildings. Tree #32 should be removed. There is ample evidence of interior decay, and it is likely to strike the residence if it fails during our most common wind storms from the south-east. Tree #9 should be made into a smaller snag or removed. At its current height and location, this snag is very likely to strike the garage. RE-PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS: All new plants should be irrigated for the first four years. The first year after planting it is absolutely critical they receive water during our driest months; July,August and September. If irrigation cannot be made available, I strongly recommend that plantings take place in November so the young plants can establish a root system prior to the regular summer drought period. Smaller plants have a greater chance of survival. Conifers should not exceed 3' in height, deciduous plants should not exceed approx. 5' in height. The best root systems come from plants grown in fabric grow-bags, though these are fairly new techniques and can be difficult to find in retail nurseries. Ask your nurseryman about acquiring trees grown using this method. Bare-root trees are second best. The drawback is that they are usually only available in the spring, and fall planting is best for unirrigated plants. Plants in containers are the next best, with plants in ball and burlap being last. Plants tolerant of drought are a good choice. Some native conifers include Shore Pine (Pinus contorta) and Mountain Hemlock(Tsuga mertensiana). 5 Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) is a good broadleaf evergreen, as is Golden Chinquapin (Chrysolepis chrysopylla), though both are very difficult to locate in nurseries. Vine Maple (Acer circinatum) and Serviceberry (Amelanchier hybrids) are good deciduous varieties, though they need summer watering. Richard R Hefley Consulting Arborist 360.385.2921 rkhefley @olypen.com PO Box 177 Nordland WA 98358 6 Page 1 of.3 Michelle Farfan From: Shelly Ament[amentkma @DFW.WA.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:52 AM To: Michelle Farfan; amentkma @dfw.wa.gov; Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Residence-Tala Hi Gary, I'm sorry to hear about the damage that has occurred to trees on your property this past winter. It sounds like some of the significant bald eagle habitat remaining on your property has been impacted. As per your Bald Eagle Management Plan: "Condition 7) Danger trees may be removed if trees are identified as hazardous by a professional forester or certified arborist. A written report from the forester/arborist must be submitted to the WDFW before approval to remove the hazard trees is granted. A tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals may be removed without a report." The WDFW does not consider a "lumberman/tree cutter" to met the qualifications needed. We would like an official report that details more information about each tree and why they will need to be removed. It is unfortunate that you have waited until now to contact Michelle and I. We are now in the sensitive bald eagle breeding season. Your management plan outlined recommendations for no tree removal from February 1 - August 15. It would be good to have the work completed as soon as possible. I have attached a list of some certified arborist/professional foresters that you may consider. Others are listed in the phone book. I will be on vacation 2/19 - 3/2 but will advise my assistant Sandy how to proceed when she has received an official report for removal of the danger trees. The report can be sent to me at P.O. Box 1933, Sequim, WA 98382. Take care, Shelly >>> "Greene, Gary" <Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil> 02/13/2007 8:20 AM >>> Michelle, In looking at my letter of February 12th, I realized that I forgot to include a severely leaning 12-18" white fir as a Danger tree. I have revised the letter and site plan to include this third danger tree.To avoid confusion I have re-dated the revised letter and site plan revision as February 13, 2007. I will mail the original of this revision tomorrow. I also scanned this letter and site plan in "color" mode so hopefully you will be able to see the color coding when you open the document. However I also added a large "X" through for those trees uprooted, and placed the word "danger" next to the pink dots depicting the danger trees. The site plan is a "scan" of a "scan" so it may not be very legible.The mailed version will be much easier to decipher. Sorry for all the confusion. 2/13/2007 Page 2 of 3 Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us[mai_lto mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.usj Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:56 PM To: Greene, Gary; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Residence -Tala Hi Gary: Is it possible for you to identify the trees that were uprooted by putting an "X" in the circle on the map and the dying danger trees by putting a "D" in the circle and resending me the map? (When I print out the map it is not clear what trees we are talking about since the gray shades are too close in color). Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:38 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE Residence -Tala Importance: High Michelle&Shelly, Attached is a request to remove two danger trees from our property on Tala Shore Drive. It also documents the trees that were blown down during the most recent December 2006 wind storms. We were absolutely crushed when we learned that we had lost three major trees - they were absolutely magnificent and a large reason why we purchased this property! In the process of cleaning up those fallen trees, both lumberman/tree cutters we interviewed strongly recommended that we also remove two other diseased/dying trees. I guess the only positive thing about these storms is that these weakened trees came down before we started to build. We want to remove these two additional weakened trees before we start building in the spring. We are holding off cleaning up the storm damage until we can obtain approval for these two additional trees. I will place these documents in the mail today. Shelly - Is the attached copies adequate for your purposes? If not, please provide a mailing address and I'll mail you a copy. 2/13/2007 Page 3 of 3 •Thank you for your continued assistance. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 2/13/2007 • Certified Arborists/Professional Foresters Bess Bronstein Richard Hefley 9670 NE Kingston Farm Rd. P.O. Box 177 Kingston,WA 98346 Nordland, WA 98358 (360)297-7031 (360)385-2921 bessAearthlink.net rkheflev(a,olvpen.com C&A Tree Service Chris McCollum P.O. Box 945 Kingston, WA 98346 (360)697-4911 James Causton 603 Old Olympic Highway Port Angeles,WA 98362 (360)452-TREE Scott's Tree Service Scott Parr P.O. Box 1925 Poulsbo,WA 98370 (3600697-3972 www.scottstree.com Tree Solutions, Inc. Scott Baker 1058 N. 39th St. Seattle,WA 98103 (206)528-4670 scott(a,treesolutions.net Treez,Inc. Jim Trainer 3651 Loretta Lane NE Bremerton,WA 98310 Cell (360)649-8465 www.treezinc.com 'Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:33 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: amentkma @dfw.wa.gov; BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: GREENE Project-Tala Shores F'DF TALA Itr dtd 14Feb07.PDF Michelle, The attached letter went into the mail today. I promise this is the last change! Please disregard the two previous versions of this letter. They are both in error. Last night, while reviewing my notes, I realized that we actually lost FOUR trees during the last round of winter storms. The letter and site plan have been revised to document the FOUR trees that have been blown down, and the THREE trees that are considered danger trees. We have retained the services of Mr. Richard Hefley to conduct an assessment of the danger trees at a cost of $300 +/- dollars. I guess $300 is simply a drop in the bucket, considering what we already have invested in this property! Thanks for your patience on this matter. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 1 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St, #166 Seattle, WA 98107 February 14,2007 Michelle Farfan Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms.Farfan: Please disregard my letters of February 12t and 13th,2007 on the same topic. They were in error. I would like to make three changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated February 114,2007 I request permission to remove three trees that pose a significant hazard to our garage and parking area; 1. Remove tree#6. Tree#6,a 34"hemlock,has lost 90%Of its needles and is dying. 2. Remove tree#9. As reported in my letter of June 19,2006 the top 1/3 of tree#9 was snapped off during the winter storms of 2005-2006 and will eventually die. 3. Remove a 18"diameter white fir tree that is leaning approximately 35 degrees and remains standing only because it is wedged into the canopy of the adjacent tree. This tree is located along our driveway at the entrance to our property. Dying trees#6 and#9 pose a significant threat to our garage and parking area. The leaning tree poses a threat to our driveway and our neighbors'property. The"danger"trees are marked with a pink dot. As required by our eagle management plan,we will retain a certified arborist/professional forester to provide a written evaluation of these trees. Also,please note that four trees were up-rooted and overturned during the severe wind storms that occurred during December 2006:a 36"white fir located in the septic field,a 24"white fir located at the entrance to our property,a 36"white fir located near perk hole#5,and tree#7 located immediately above our parking area. I have marked the approximate location of these up-rooted trees on the site plan with a green dot with an"X". I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Garv.F.Greene©uscg.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, / 1,\2Gary (AL ene Copy: Shelley Ament, WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife ; ii I I IIIII�• 11111 ti ' iill • { IIiIIC • Ilk i °° U milli F S g II .14.4, 111 < it r� Q "°,..,.,..._42k, t I r 1 ,. i ----- 1 4 It >( ij ..(1) . • --,-------,--, —„Iii Ili,AtiNt ::::.4 4.4%,.N4Nut .„.44,.„, I a x !1 A. ,..... Igi ili r \irl 401111104411 /74, .4 . 1 1 ..:1,,,,. .44.t:...iiitlit,,irat.,11‘.- ,,, ior oiir, :,lig* 2 I i r I :... 1 ,........4„.........k 4, Efri !..til 1 ( ..,'--44440,...----*:z-'--i.‘4,.., t. 6 ' V tor I 1 ll'IPP*-04.n„T.T,i ,„ ..• 1:16,ra� k S -p ./i ` X# +\/ • i ySs 1x v},,r I W 1 It il ! � y��{ q� R x^ ! a 4 E !I{ ! / i! 11161.11.1* s+ , ` *» ,.., t,., �tY` 1 t S.\ `l Li "` 1if °�' � �!>i i �1 I ill lis II'll i 1 ; ib� .?,i c 4 . \ $ i is @ 5 : as 3' � 1 1 III ,'';?.:',:;.:4.1°'' ,: 'foal is a IV 'E, I 9 I ''..,::;,1t..t'e 0 op [,,le ' -- ----- -,..---a-- * g .10 � I - - Ski t • ,f"S4'w1�11w gown.7 •w • w".,,....4.:,. '�J Ot,iFL w iwa .s w.tw3 SaSww Ywwlww.a Saaw#: �"_ r 1 I;II[If��e��n�ailti�i� a���: 1 I.u1Ir VuY��nY�uunu���yuMryr �,� 1 •P • SeattleGary Greene 2442 NW MWA arket 9810 7 St, #166 , ,k tvo kkvAk. A February 12,2007 ¶ � ,� � Michelle Farfan �1 ` Jefferson County '' Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms. Farfan: I would like to make two changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated February 12,2007 I request permission to remove two trees that pose a significant hazard to our garage and parking area; 1. Remove tree#6. Tree#6,a 34"hemlock, has lost 90%of its needles and is dying. 2. Remove tree#9. As reported in my letter of June 19,2006 the top 1/3 of tree#9 was snapped off during the winter storms of 2005-2006 and will eventually die. Both of these dying trees pose a significant threat to the garage and parking area. Their removal is recommended by Mr.Joe Thompson,an experienced lumberman and tree cutter. Mr. Thompson can be reached at 360-643-3732. Also,please note that three trees were up-rooted and overturned during the severe wind storms that occurred during December 2006:a 36"white fir located in the septic field,a 36"white fir located between perk holes#4 and#5,and tree#7. I have marked the approximate location of these un- numbered trees on the site plan in green. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Gary.F.Greene@ uscq.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, / v Gary Green Copy: Shelley Ament, WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife q r.`7,1 w a t,o vO • .. o a g P �I Q a W C O a z F o J ,ct, :://4 ' 4", , !"2, . 1-4 Ts. RI til E !.,' 5 E?..-EN s W o w O O w I o M Lu 'o g w :i).'O E21,; mw w�� z z O 3�- o 1. ce 54 F- ;:i : I II II I S/ O Sj Jp`/01 c, .ff— . /441** 4 ', ' 1-d `9--__ ,I 1%.= , - \'".Z:',4,411P•■■ 41,„ 1 i '' ) ''l ‘ 4\44.*/47 46. O. , t `\°per sm '�/ m y k' / a i r $ _ w gl4� Qba d�� w. • °• � ¢Q tu- Ili ! i End �1 yaiss •� OWE _ •�Cif ' s'.\\ �\`z\\,.'V �� `\ \\\\�\�\\sue\\�- w' _ :m p w �V$M\\O\\\\\\\��\\\\\\\�\voo\\\\ao\\\ \ \V\\\ s\�. a\ ftE E a .a ' . IA�o\\\�\\�\\\\\\ \\\ \\` \\\\\\\o� \\\\k -\\ \\ v vvvmovv00\V o� \\\\,vvA\vV;vv` 5v g_l a' �� ti VAVy AA V AOAAOAVA��\\� I V�,�V A\ ,`A, ►• __ �j { CD �i �� \�AO V`A VAvv°v�oA�w �\I roV ��\ A\vO\� —IT--- • oC � 2\�\\\ Ao AAy p 3g �v i / \�\\\\\4 \,\;\ \ \p\\ 1- O0 / i� i \'° � —ter '�� / A '.,:7, es/4d.-,:kwEi:/:.Wjaktv .444;,,, Ile .\ I /1 n k�- r■ L9 to II ' ilioii., , 2 % 1--- 1 111 i I: 9LII 6 Lu 1 �, 1`I \ o ff \ ''1 m W hl I t / 1 I Ni 1 b ti ir .1 NI m ; »s ` 9 '‘2,,t,. \^ I �' ; �:� ; W W " I ° a 0 = €°I= a -/ 3 § \ 4' wieE° � e9„s ' °y • a ,5- vil tpt .1. il 4... \ ic.4 . i C- -- At, 1'4 OeI4 I t •wiz \ :k r�,,\ 4' I s 14 N .i t /1 1 \ \ `tf m3� ,� ,� N pi . il 1 ,.. 4,km a1 I s 4 Q-$� x,h v ��e a4.0 6z ©—p � apS� '` __�_+ s°°z _T 2ssb2Ncb\\ p_ 0 . Y io ..T.4 ir-i IME:[:::::::::::::3:23:11 --=G. 010000OC :0800000000000000000000060000 & \\\\ W ■ y Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 8:21 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Residence-Tala Importance: High FGF FL Tala ltr 13Feb07.PDF Michelle, In looking at my letter of February 12th, I realized that I forgot to include a severely leaning 12-18" white fir as a Danger tree. I have revised the letter and site plan to include this third danger tree. To avoid confusion I have re-dated the revised letter and site plan revision as February 13, 2007. I will mail the original of this revision tomorrow. I also scanned this letter and site plan in "color" mode so hopefully you will be able to see the color coding when you open the document. However I also added a large "X" through for those trees uprooted, and placed the word "danger" next to the pink dots depicting the danger trees. The site plan is a "scan" of a "scan" so it may not be very legible. The mailed version will be much easier to decipher. Sorry for all the confusion. Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:56 PM To: Greene, Gary; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @grahamdunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Residence - Tala Hi Gary: Is it possible for you to identify the trees that were uprooted by putting an "X" in the circle on the map and the dying danger trees by putting a "D" in the circle and resending me the map? (When I print out the map it is not clear what trees we are talking about since the gray shades are too close in color) . Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) 1 Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:38 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE Residence - Tala Importance: High Michelle & Shelly, Attached is a request to remove two danger trees from our property on Tala Shore Drive. It also documents the trees that were blown down during the most recent December 2006 wind storms. We were absolutely crushed when we learned that we had lost three major trees - they were absolutely magnificent and a large reason why we purchased this property! In the process of cleaning up those fallen trees, both lumberman/tree cutters we interviewed strongly recommended that we also remove two other diseased/dying trees. I guess the only positive thing about these storms is that these weakened trees came down before we started to build. We want to remove these two additional weakened trees before we start building in the spring. We are holding off cleaning up the storm damage until we can obtain approval for these two additional trees. I will place these documents in the mail today. Shelly - Is the attached copies adequate for your purposes? If not, please provide a mailing address and I'll mail you a copy. Thank you for your continued assistance. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 2 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St, #166 Seattle, WA 98107 February 13,2007 Michelle Farfan Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms.Farfan: I would like to make three changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated February 13,2007 I request permission to remove three trees that pose a significant hazard to our garage and parking area; 1. Remove tree#6. Tree#6,a 34"hemlock,has lost 90%of its needles and is dying. 2. Remove tree#9. As reported in my letter of June 19,2006 the top 1/3 of tree#9 was snapped off during the winter storms of 2005-2006 and will eventually die. 3. Remove a 12-18"diameter white fir tree that is leaning approximately 35 degrees and remains standing only because it is wedged into the canopy of the adjacent tree. This tree is located along our driveway at the entrance to our property. Dying trees#6 and#9 pose a significant threat to our garage and parking area. The leaning tree poses a threat to our driveway and our neighbors'property. The removal of these trees is recommended by Mr.Joe Thompson,an experienced lumberman and tree cutter. Mr.Thompson can be reached at 360- 643-3732. The"danger'trees are marked with a pink dot and are labeled"danger'. Also,please note that three trees were up-rooted and overturned during the severe wind storms that occurred during December 2006:a 36"white fir located in the septic field,a 36"white fir located between perk holes#4 and#5,and tree#7. I have marked the approximate location of these up- rooted trees on the site plan with a green dot and placed an"X"through it. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Garv.F.Greene @uscg.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, CP04°' rk-ernse--- Gary Greene • Copy: Shelley Ament, WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife • �. k 7 � - .........�..,�. ,..�� _.:...__. ,Irmo.::/110 lli Pli 111111111111 11111' 7411i Jill U ! HIiH.4ir « 1 i i 1... 14, - "\ —a 1 ! VI • i 0 ff ,� H Y M E � .4 ID „....,. _ iltr '►�..,AY _ , ..,.. . N I ir P X 4f)it ..18) \I - , .. } 454 •• 6-106‘,,,...ii—,k * ..4,. .,71 . : gme I ! i (r *,fit UM ,y ,'i It 1191 rte` " `' R '*4144444"4:411111 A 1 li"♦ r ,i III NJ i I 110,, -... ..- : , : ,, - 4" 4 tj =ariof . - ' -- ' ' 4 - - - ° f w^ i , 11,........_ rers,,.....". .,:._,,,,...,.......-,.:,:: 4:: ,... _,;;,:i.:1•0,---t.- _ -...., - to, ,,,,,,,.. , II I I ; i p . 1 . 101,07. 41., Imo, , . .4tiiiktatt.r.441- 1 ' i III Phi ! '" ,, 00,0:;,A11110'. - ,N .,t. ' . -. ,...,, m 1 ))11-111' - g lilt i \ NA \ . . . 4 I i! 4 ' -.--,. -„ P;(0,-.\.1 ligle r/ / �� f` rr lr mtir• - \ I • 1. .. . i, , DI 1 %, , 7 (1.9\I I ,, . 1-4. —0.zp —at ..„.."---...1 YY .f.. Ieera llii#Yxer4[. ..... 1. . . av r ,, t let s to...,.f+tat f' �� $:11441'114,#Nttb# i# ....."7„..„ it 4.144i+++i1 4Ih4 A y� • Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:56 PM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil'; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE Residence-Tala Hi Gary: Is it possible for you to identify the trees that were an and resending in the circle on the map and the dying danger trees by putting me the map? (When I print out the map it is not clear what trees we are talking about since the gray shades are too close in color) . Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:38 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE Residence - Tala Importance: High Tala She & Drive. It also remove two danger down during property on Tala Shore Drive. It also do December 2006 wind storms. We were absolutely crushed when we learned that we had lost three major trees - they were absolutely magnificent and a large reason why we purchased this property! In the process of cleaning up those fallen trees, both lumberman/tree cutters we interviewed strongly recommended that we also remove two other diseased/dying trees. I guess the only positive thing about these storms is that these weakened trees came down before we started to build. We want to remove these two additional weakened trees before we start building in the spring. We are holding off cleaning up the storm damage until we can obtain approval for these two additional trees. I will place these documents in the mail today. Shelly - Is the attached copies adequate for your purposes? If not, please provide a mailing address and I'll mail you a copy. Thank you for your continued assistance. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 1 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene@uscg.mil 2 • Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:38 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Shelly Ament Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE Residence-Tala Importance: High PGF P6F Greene Site Plan GREENE Site Plan Diagram 12Feb... 12Feb07.PDF Michelle & Shelly, Attached is a request to remove two danger trees from our property on Tala Shore Drive. It also documents the trees that were blown down during the most recent December 2006 wind storms. We were absolutely crushed when we learned that we had lost three major trees - they were absolutely magnificent and a large reason why we purchased this property! In the process of cleaning up those fallen trees, both lumberman/tree cutters we interviewed strongly recommended that we also remove two other diseased/dying trees. I guess the only positive thing about these storms is that these weakened trees came down before we started to build. We want to remove these two additional weakened trees before we start building in the spring. We are holding off cleaning up the storm damage until we can obtain approval for these two additional trees. I will place these documents in the mail today. Shelly - Is the attached copies adequate for your purposes? If not, please provide a mailing address and I'll mail you a copy. Thank you for your continued assistance. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene@uscg.mil 1 Y V _________________i_______ :, , —_ i `rr� *_,•„....t,.. ,•�` ..�, ,L a ''''' lit --i 4 x f i o l• g >Y i• 'm� `^ � .ka a I ' i II , k !/ n ",,0,11...-- _ tu Q ' , 1 �� � . Y x.1 . g ■ I i it—_ to, „.„-;,a-zoil s ' !I t : iI 1 1 1 at ," Irk" 1 D 16 .11 .. i i \ 11 " � ' till 1 j! 11 _ ;ili!,• "'" r lii 1 Ili! �" g 's� i1 11 \\ ti / 1 Is tit I i'i ii:IIl 11 arti� 1$ li - II 1 Elwil II ` i iE,1 s I�\"E 1111 ..f?.;:). � gtRe5\ 1 li - I griii- — i !it 04. it! ,, \ 5 z t;111 �(11 tli :t �1 4, :: yy e �` 54ti 1 � \ � 434, �' � Y1�„` .t..., !ill :�� ti 4)411111; , ,,- -4.Zrci. L-„ r4i. ‘4,..si x_i5 i 5��� � "a `ay>o. r 44 ' 4-- ' .... 0 lit-'. " 771 n `.1 " 44 '`,� ' 1r1i1 `a� .fiti.:', , \,,\'� \ , 1 l .1.11 4 1 ass. b � . �J 1 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St, #166 Seattle, WA 98107 February 12,2007 Michelle Farfan Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms.Farfan: I would like to make two changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated February 12,2007 I request permission to remove two trees that pose a significant hazard to our garage and parking area; 1. Remove tree#6. Tree#6,a 34"hemlock,has lost 90%of its needles and is dying. 2. Remove tree#9. As reported in my letter of June 19,2006 the top 1/3 of tree#9 was snapped off during the winter storms of 2005-2006 and will eventually die. Both of these dying trees pose a significant threat to the garage and parking area. Their removal is recommended by Mr.Joe Thompson,an experienced lumberman and tree cutter. Mr.Thompson can be reached at 360-643-3732. Also,please note that three trees were up-rooted and overturned during the severe wind storms that occurred during December 2006:a 36"white fir located in the septic field,a 36"white fir located between perk holes#4 and#5,and tree#7. I have marked the approximate location of these un- numbered trees on the site plan in green. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Garv.F.Greene@usco.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, t*)QVIr /1".7 (Uttir1/41," Gary Green Copy: Shelley Ament, WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife \ Aa \ gm ..E. > � mvmww -st_se n � w w��auptN emav'as G c m a nero x F � A 1 N r. \\�` ��\� 11 §1 g 1 E §4// q 2§11 . R 1411+4• ' °' s \•� t, r- 57, ( �° ; . s 2u R ,74s, � A �r `\��` �2J�. . '�(� ('\ 2ba ern I $ �'Sir��i� ... ,� l� J, o to gI!:; iI9T�= �— , yam �E A �$ 0;m • A:� ,,;:;,/-,..,:'';',4.,1-,,,, �'� • v Ivy O � 2 M ". 7,- Eri 2%.-. ,`;-ANN k`,`.1-, x m \ `�' ' "p, 4 ell -,,,,g1 ��� semx g mQ '1 fi o I� � « A 9 i 8s o -, M> $moo 14:0'�N ' �` �N\ 0 1- oo ; g s= 2g ra t1i ac o c \0=-.2 ' \ -,g M li mF Qom/'// no �m xN <`^ c� Fim� �zo�sn .'i�' r 1� \\ S � - .- hi 6- � '/ 9a mg 94 yi g2 E265: 74;';-' \`\ n $ _4. ti / \ K ^- m T zo o a� i .. 'z \ y r-• 0,G lil Sit a -0 =_ \ °',y cA n 9 < � �\ \ �i \ \ / o \ !:r i / ,,, ,/ K\ \ , o WG7 env. J k ❑ 1 i : <,,,,,,,. p.r X j . �\ c., 9•'--�-`� \ \ m 2:1 �D i�`1" < _ _,m I w {r b ' — / � \ 1 mvm � g� _ �,�v� � , � � I \\ --t— __ - > t,-6.g IF p , ' 73 1 alo I �� O %. r1 � 11 m^ i I =- __- \ 1 w ,ice I / _—- \ ■ i i ,'T. eat �1 t� >i� y I �- \�✓, / —__L___— /� 1 '. ►..���, ter„_r ,y_ 9_ geg.. ;ti.'' .� / \ / —f-- -h d�r , \x' ®„ i lip ---,ti c) / --� mil F� �••M.. 1•w*1' ,.,,,.,Sr.-' --�r / ' / (.a i I�../ I / r -` i j ,dry 1;4=4; • .> 4,s,' ' C i (w, a l 1 / --- -_-• 1i wog \ I 0 1 "a2. 3?. �- F \ : -- —_ n I O D ��'"' , YT't +l... r - b'w i L' L}1'/f m m.8 � -- v` r r fir- n � Oy ni I y�O. I,_\..-� 1.1 "YU$ =�w Y ."{ f Ai1�;{ _�N 0 / 'C H /_— -- ,-,2 N I A \�, _..-J Ie`- } 7°. s 14-A,�le\•7'he'd,\N�' .�d �v y / b '� , H r" 4, \, e` a . .. l;1 1,o- 11 0 //i = m _ E. -'r-- I{-i' •\_, \\ ,Ate ` K 1r '`y o i . ,� ,_,,,,t,,,,,,,,,,,\,`,..,,,„. , \� V _ 4. : a�aw41.4 %�t� ff i i _ PI �\ D'�2� , �\ .\nom' \'''''' / 7 = _ i f,.. %- ��lbe �_'"",_� _‘ _ -roc. \ , 0 1,„:,1 /0 o=4 r, \� �1%,W' ` k'6° 3_0 0 2 'a�' -9- A � 1�q����1,E. ! tit C'y �mo�, g �+,- m / 1 ',alt...te° 9 a — al - III.., ...,'0 41. 1..8. .3,..41......:z.., ,1 -- -H Rill i i i ''' rei „Ito :.......t. .4, 4,,, ,Awi '4'444'1; l t' j \• N 1 n n1 — \\ — N�M1 --v= � % SETBACK m ::: AO 1) _ .,.... E. tI ![ m ___ _0 , _',1 ^ pie __ / \ : I 7J 9 m _ ____'- m) I\ CO ■ _ m --TOp --- B ° __ ,.. i g g _ _ >< ilp cp o o A _— ._. off m / — _ -- --. 4114:111 r :4- II - __-_--=_______m G (V -ei m= o m ti T= si:j m co CS C Z _t? .S a 0 o µ co -Inc... g ; us - -- Q rn C �" n C; P g c S z • --I iy . o t It am e'D iv co m ICI 0 N - age , , ycn �, t. � ort. C I I �z � � y Z H .' til :BZa �' CG -� A m i m fi t-, r z C z ri7 C y C e.1 v ,• '-R 1 �' Oo z a t'' r '"� Pi W rt t1-1 0 A A y �' H Z 1--1 tz g . m I I 1 = o m s vC, In ,..1 M c, 07 w x 171 1 • Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 1 of 5 Michelle Farfan From: Shelly Ament[amentkma @DFW.WA.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:23 PM To: Michelle Farfan; amentkma @dfw.wa.gov Subject: Re: FW: GREENE PROJECT-850 Tala Shores Drive Hi Michelle, I'm glad we were able to talk earlier today regarding the proposed tree removal on the Greene property. As you are aware, Gary and Betty Greene have a Bald Eagle Management Plan that was mutually developed and signed with WDFW. I understand that they have proposed some new tree removal on their parcel located at 850 Tala Shores Drive. I do appreciate you sending the more recent e-mail message that clarified the proposed tree removal near the driveway entrance. I understand the trees must be removed to accommodate the access of large construction vehicles and fire trucks to the property. This e-mail serves as official notification from WDFW that the landowners may proceed with the proposed removal of the 1 downed tree, 1 damaged tree, the 2 identified maple danger trees, and the small conifers at the driveway entrance. Please move forward on processing their final permit approval. As mitigation for the tree removal, they have offered to plant more small conifer trees on the parcel. I will attached a copy of our e-mail correspondence to their signed plan within our Regional office files. Thanks for contacting me regarding this issue, Shelly Ament WDFW Wildlife Biologist >>> "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us> 08/15/2006 11:24 AM >>> FYI Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@Co.jefferson.wa.us 36O-379-4457 36o-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:43 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Subject: RE: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 1 of 6 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:21 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: FW: GREENE PROJECT-850 Tala Shores Drive Thanks! Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greenena uscg.mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:20 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: FW: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Yes. Sorry I forgot to mention that. It's in the mail. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4973 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:45 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: FW: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Michelle, That's GREAT news. Will there be a revised site plan too? A significant revision was the routing of the storm water drainage under the stream rather than suspended under the bridge. As you know Jeff Davis already revised the HPA to allow the placement of the storm water under the stream. Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 2 of 6 • Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary_F.Greene(cDuscg.mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:32 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: FW: FW: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Hi Gary: Below is Shelly's approval. I sent the revised permits to you yesterday with the stamped approved cover sheet of the engineered drainage plan. I believe we are now complete for you to commence work. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-3791457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Shelly Ament [mailto:amentkma @DFW.WA.GOV] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:23 PM To: Michelle Farfan; amentkma @dfw.wa.gov Subject: Re: FW: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Hi Michelle, I'm glad we were able to talk earlier today regarding the proposed tree removal on the Greene property. As you are aware, Gary and Betty Greene have a Bald Eagle Management Plan that was mutually developed and signed with WDFW. I understand that they have proposed some new tree removal on their parcel located at 850 Tala Shores Drive. I do appreciate you sending the more recent e-mail message that clarified the proposed tree removal near the driveway entrance. I understand the trees must be removed to accommodate the access of large construction vehicles and fire trucks to the property. This e-mail serves as official notification from WDFW that the landowners may proceed with the proposed removal of the 1 downed tree, 1 damaged tree, the 2 identified maple danger trees, and the small conifers at the driveway entrance. Please move forward on processing their final permit approval. As mitigation for the tree removal, they have offered to plant more small conifer trees on the parcel. I will attached a copy of our e-mail correspondence to their signed plan within our Regional office files. Thanks for contacting me regarding this issue, Shelly Ament WDFW Wildlife Biologist 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 3 of 6 >>> "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us> 08/15/2006 11:24 AM >>> FYI Michelle Ferfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-3791457 360-379-4473 (Fax) Original Message From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:43 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Subject: RE: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Good morning Gary: I just finished going through my emails and voice messages and have nothing from Shelly Ament. The stormwater site plan does not have an official county approved stamp on it as it is an engineered plan with an engineers stamp on it. I will stamp the first page and date it to when the permits were issued on January 30, 2006 and send it to you in the mail today with the other revised permits to delete the bluff buffer. Once I hear from Shelly, I will stamp the revised site plan and send it to you. (I called and left her a voice message to please contact me either by email or voice message to let me know if she's ok with it) Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @cosjef ferson.wa.us 360-379-M7 360-379-4473(fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 8:57 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE PROJECT-850 Tala Shores Drive Importance: High 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 4 of 6 Good Morning Michelle, I just left a voice message, but wanted to follow up with an email. Request to know the status of our request to modify our site plan. Last time we talked, you were waiting for a response from Shelly Ament. Shelly verbally told us that she would favorably endorse the proposed tree removal. Have you received her input? Also, we have an approved Engineered Storm Water Plan. This Plan is referenced by name and date in both the HPA and the building permit. However I can't find any official County Approval Stamp on the actual storm water blue print or accompanying Plan/Analysis. Should there be? If yes, how can I get a copy officially stamped? Finally, I would like to have all four of our building permits amended to remove the requirement for the bluff buffer. As you will recall, a few months ago you modified one of the four. As I mentioned on the phone, our contractor is scheduled to start the site work on August 21st, so please advise if I need to pester Shelly. Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F_Greene@uscg_mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:34 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Heard from Amy and no problem. Haven' heard from Shelly yet. Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@Cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:32 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE PROJECT- 850 Tala Shores Drive Importance: High Michelle, Here is the response from Amy Leitman. Will it suffice, or do you need something more formal from her? 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 5 of 6 Have you heard anything from Shelly Ament? Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil From: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com [mailto:BGreene @ GrahamDunn.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:53 AM To: Greene, Gary Subject: Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive FYI Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message From:Amy Leitman<sea @cablespeed.com> To:Greene,Betty R. Sent:Tue Jul 25 19:18:21 2006 Subject: Re: 850 Tala Shores Drive Yes,I see no problem with the removal of these days for the purposes that you described. I have as well emailed the same to Michelle.Please let me know if she will need something more formal than this statement of concurrence. Thanks and good luck, Amy R.Leitman Marine Surveys&Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend,WA 98360 Phone: 360 385-4073 Fax: 360 385-1724 Cell: 360 301-0262 Email: sea @cablespeed.com Original Message From:BGreene @GrahamDunn.com To: sea @cablespeed.com Sent:Tuesday,July 25,2006 5:54 PM Subject: 850 Tala Shores Drive Hi Amy, We are finally going to begin site preparation work on our property at Tala Shores and have advised Michelle Farfan(Project Planner, Dept.of Community Development for Jefferson County)of a couple of changes. She indicated to us that you, too,need to sign off on them. 1. One large evergreen blew down in the storms last winter and needs to be removed from the property. It is outside the buffer. In addition,the top of another evergreen outside the buffer blew off and the tree may need to be removed. 8/15/2006 Fw: 850 Tala Shores Drive Page 6 of 6 • 2. We may have to take down a small nurse tree and/or one in a cluster of 3 medium evergreen trees at the entrance to the driveway. The contractor has advised us that he thinks his equipment(and also fire trucks) may not be able to make the 90 degree driveway turn drawn on our plans. Again,this is outside of the buffer area. 3. We reviewed the status of all trees on the property and believe that two big-leaf maples within the buffer are hazard trees. They both are leaning quite dramatically and could fall on a structure in a future winter storm. We are proposing that the trees be removed before construction begins. If these changes are satisfactory to you,we would appreciate your approval. We're scheduled to begin site clearing the first week in August. Thank you. Betty R.Greene,COO Graham&Dunn PC 2801 Alaskan Way#300 Seattle,Washington 98121 206-340-9670 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege,work product doctrine or other confidentiality protection. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error,do not read it. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error,and then delete it. Thank you. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege, work If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read it. Plea: Thank you. 1 8/15/2006 \ O °w i.,=Sfo%' SnaL' b"o I."�.NOmm vm macro-.o i0'l:AS:IIEIC r „ -.1 0,34 -11111.111111.iliiiiiiiiiiiRitOtti•Plii ii L a §§"' "' § § §§ ii 0. sg F� `, "-..."Zs N2~•\_\ ��\ '°°�. s Lrn Flu T" - t'Q \ �\ � ` \��) {�/ �iy 1 $ '4'1'r r'1�t1. '� nitre ] g ilh y bn�' rE -firr R �\ \� ® a .1k om, \ ,., & �,+"_ ry .^° G r.„-,,t,' g y I 4A a' a� c, : ' ii ; w r $ I �4i ,o ,- o z5 :\ r , e _ , ,c '� m n 1 � -\ fi a iI��• �— l yL.A %A " g 5� � 8- — — n' F 9� F• =•\ ——_ e-r -It N��� N` �`,� �� - \ � m� n 7 ,...-7 a r i8 fl Jfl A____ y ` ,- ° ° \ ° c ° a o 1 1,./51 U' �4 xN K^ a �"° �np b/ 4. \ c: r x °i /M mm , \ m 0 .1 ,/ . o�/ r, \ } w \o z ,11 / i / z ,---• \ K., > y r I mvm �sJ \ \ \ r 2 " 0 = 2 329N 6. 1 11 14010, lit" z i i \ ---E---- It liNt.,,„ W.: 1$5 i.&I, 9,' ° _:. j. - a m lo ' \/.�I ____ ..._„______ Z9 � � / �-':3_, -- ..1 __________:__:__ l _ —__--es� .,'eli,„,, y �a � / w / r-\ I. j g ___________. .. _____,...... , r tir: I i I / --+---j -f1 ' ;fi ' ) .+.ff^'S L r cy / ./ i j I/ q •1_ } `r^ +k ' .•;, r -1 - i . i I' o F \ j' , u. i �Ar. ff � a % N Cv I /p I - tA , 2 \ 1 _ � I D . ff � r / p 1 A . _—' . / ". " Vs '' "z -'n o i' v - - x'Ci • F Y '4,'..4-410,,..' N ' > /- i ;.3 I ' m • 0. te ' � " i m i 1 -. - � '\ Q� , ? <o Jay f 0 ' . G � GF 7 / c., -,7. \\ 1 \.„ „„.....**,,„ ...„,-,Noo ,,,,, ..k.,,.,;..,,,,• ,- y.,.,...,...„t—, ,,,,„,,--104,-,s,,,,,; :,.....;„,,sfeAtfAl4).#.1w,,, , r_, , 0 1 1, \ L Pr,';1114r1gAM.11M-'.;14,7"•&‘":':'''':1+:4'9 \ V.-; �g1 I z / - G1 / •. ' ' \ c�" ' / \, / ----�'� a:. \ �`�\ _ ,sAt •� �i�c1 +� , /t-- \ — -----■ -,, v.,,,,,, .\'''',,\,N .- --, ''4",:',,,,\‘ s -•\,, '"',,,•-t4,'--- -dliwriv , -oak ' ' '- - v ' 1 R=s 1i : .,im a. .' t:� _uhf— G. • F.1'0,. n 1 Ippy �—z ta cn2 --1 -ii�I ° .dZ �` 4._.- 'Im / / I x ' oap� 0. _= f�41) ...,,... or,>>O� Z I Iii 7 Cn t SETBACK _.", CA : �.. 'V 0 2 - -? _4, 4,07 0 Ily.44.0. , --- '.--,,.' \ -: A (:)."_ 40(I ,. a o 4.1 ► / - _ - of r\ pp o c - - / ok O S \. 00 .e., / e / SO'� v,� �,� _ — CCU _ — O cn-1'.. "1111114:....r. / a 1 - = _— . m� Z G IN) gg C co =,-,===.---- A 1 IMF II AIL 0--- '-- 4011 '' __ fi+ yam, ) �� 4= 5.... f�Tl 3 $m s �l o µ ...7'..,71 m a m --�Z C; /C _ ® �r '' n 211 a S , °° z ° O = if C-T7 k ;. M 74.=, m 5 CA I I I ( I ! m x K r�I y C n m cam z a CP cn A .» m1 f Cz 0 r 0 to t- y H,45-,6` ' .� a ` I rc- ` b z o , ,r hi Oz r c m m ® l o. a til M x Z >. b-v v im o o% A rn N N > -1 1H'11 (I I o - x 7' tt y n, I T 17.1 It I I M w b s p n g 4,1 Michelle Farfan From: Amy Leitman [sea @cablespeed.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:28 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Re: Gary Greene site plan to remove trees I do not see any issues with removing the trees. Can they be placed along the stream edges? Good luck, Amy R. Leitman Marine Surveys & Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98360 Phone: 360 385-4073 Fax: 360 385-1724 Cell: 360 301-0262 Email: sea@cablespeed.com Original Message From: "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us> To: <amentkma @dfw.wa.gov> Cc: <sea @cablespeed.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 3:27 PM Subject: Gary Greene site plan to remove trees Hey Shelly & Amy: This is the follow-up to my voice msgs. The site plan attached shows 2 danger trees located on each side of the stream just north of the foot bridge to be removed. These trees are both alders, 26 & 30 inches. The two other trees that were blown down in January 2006 are located just south of the driveway. The one that is the most southern is a 24" hemlock and the other is unknown to size and type. Do either of you foresee any issues with the removal of these 4 trees? Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Thanks. «greene revised site plan.pdf» Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) 1 HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PLAN • —- ---- ■ -'-'''''-— ...-- ..Iv.. .....e-...x.t.7, I 1 ' '1 , . ppm- , lbel – <=4 ''•Vrt',U..t.''' ,,„.4.,Vt.,4,,,'',,,,,&..-" Tt.t,:q.,--,:,, ',.,?''',...!;:"....44,,,.. Ar.4.yrIt',■;,>,,■„:34,... i ......I.41,...4g.,,,,0 ..; . ---., -......0, .„. ...,,,,, . --... ,,,,',.„,,,,. ,., ,...:A.'4'" - '...,-,.;.• N !.:14,,,,114,;...-4746 I „ . 0 ., , '.',. ..., ,, s.',.,,,-?;,:,,,:: ,,-,:,-:ik:.4....4,k,',"-,N,.'1.,z`:%:'*:'-4,,,.'t'A.,‘'-'4,.'Z' 0+•'' '-- ",:,1 i i:1-'4"0 AN."' ""t,k.•P.--slk..!Scsss'..,:\',' ''s.:,......% "'-':''''- 'Nv..!:..-.'""N'',..;k''-'.:'- ,. ' ',--' " , 1,446.. .,,,,,!,,,..,, , ,,:,;itjr.,1-i:,..7,;?:2''''''.::,,,,,,•',,.4i,,,,,,,'2--.:,,,,,,,;,!,.,,-,..:ik,„.,i,„,,,,,31:9,_ il,tz,Z;&'-i.,,i,"''A,z ,.,wi.,;tigiNI:,,v,t,..H.-44/4§.".,1,,,,„i7sez.ict:'c,,:::,,z0..'7.,,,tv,H,Itt:':::::,,,,..17::.4.\'.,i,:.1.!,,,,:,1,,.!:',:z.!,:zi,1,1,:iLvi.6.44,!'"4.1.. .::::,i,:,,,:;:.,0,°„$,,..;..„s.,,,..':::,,,,,,,..,.„..L,,;:,,,,..,1‘.,:,.'1".::4,"""t4,,,,,,,s,„:,;, ..t.,,,,;,:;,°:17:`,,,,,‘%."'410,70,4%Z,;... ....:-;,\.,:t;„",,,,,1.1:, ,,- .,..,441k....44i,.,,, "..7a4:4,;,...'■,...'ifi.4114: , oorD, OP*,,,,10::, - '-r,,' '.-f' ,----,"--;v' " ....:,._;-,, ----%-1.•:',,,w,„.;;;;;;.ke.N.N,',Sitz;,,, %,,,,v.A. ;;;Z::!*.4.',,t,,'„40..,,, 1,.t.,,t.„,„4-,,,,. .„-...,...., -\\--...7---.-7,;,3..,,N,--,.., ,.;-*---N,`,:',.,- -44...v.'. vs,-,,,. %,-,4.1.i....... ,,-.,-. ........„,,, 44, *'''. -...s:41 ,''''''''t:?!,,A2.."'"::,Nr.'''N":*°■f■4M:-'''''.*.';'''k NIZ1).'4.4.4*-19.1.4"1"'..tkNN, 4N, $:,:i.,1''',.:..4..1.....1*,:t'05,'''Z' '.;,.t,24.., :t1.4*":.:,‘?..1,:tArt'754 .'.'7",- -:-...tiolt&NI '- ' ' ' *2:0444t:-'410,.: ''.'‘.:2-74:1::7';I: '''';:'-"'.!'"'. %.*"...0."*."':::41 4;":"4511 k:::.fj" ,:int•li',,4','NNVVI,•C kj,,,;.i.::'k''',ft411:,, IN.71., 'V-,,.''.'',,,,,,,:7 7;,. .:‘,::. ' 'kiki,, er''',...4,.-'''''?`„V!';... .,,-7:4,i4tri°, 1*,,-:.,t':::'"":4;§',*-2-^..N147.,,,;•-°,:',„Vli,"4:;:5:,i::','3,tk-t,.;-....:1-,,,:',..‹,;;,..:74.1t:::::::,4!",,,i:.%,1!:#:::-....;,:'',-7.---z.;:-:.'"''''''''..':-;,*ii, .41*,... 1 0,7', it A ' otoste 1$`P.7.i..'..z.,,,,,,,.'i.1.4-...,:,.',.',x3,,i.,.a'..-iwzkc v,s.,..'-',..;: -.4x..,i,,,,.... .-%7 \,„;`,,ii,,,,,'N 1:,„kAA.1% tai;4:,..;".%.\"$,P,::•.`:fat-','",:..::,*:,,'...-:;i...,,, ,,:,:',i.::',.--'"`-'-i;;;:,---.,1/4:V"to.":"..' ',7,4ww,,„1:40 - tob..le'' -"''',, .. ,_Ase08.,--•--,-qr-- -,...:-:..-:',-":,,,.,,,,<-:;:.•,,,....,",..,`'°"..''.':..;- ;."-rtit...,,...,,,,,t,::::‘,11..40,..'. I V„.„!..t.;:l.\,,,,,,,..41::::::11...i.,Wiit'-..-7".„, '4':''''''',,,,g..,.:t,::: ift,,,;:"... • ....i.-,"`,: --- Pr-,.-,::,-' ." .'.'"--......:;„:„;.;„„::....rt7.-,,..2,,,,,imik,.,-.,.,,,,. ...,,, ,,•„sAA.*:::::.-74,2"\i'..,,1",..-,11..i.6,„ . ''4114,Ii2Zz-'*,:tr,t'nz",,f,".41:ziP,:s tei f...c;i:,,,.';';'::::,"f-,,,,..1=i•r,,,'i ..it..:,....„:•,::,..:_,.„,•,:,. ... ..„,:,,,..„:„,•,„„,..„,...,...„,„•41z,t;, ,.:„.zz....:::ii,,:..:.,,‘:.....3.,.. -. \,...041,.xit,„..,;%,.....4.,.4...,:v.pl:,t,::::,. .,„::::„;,..,,,,..:,.. .,::„.•:,.,. .2, ,• . - r ....4...-• - -- .i.....,:‘,--:-... ...-,:•,71,1,:w1:, :1:.;1,:-.4.,..,...z....,:w4 ,,,,,:47.14:3::0„:„.,,,,,,„:::7„:4!, • , ..rig.,...w. -,,,...... •:. , ,-,. _ _ libt 1 .R1/4:::"'" ...‘ , i,-,1:' •,+:::ZZ.:: 4,.'kAIC ',','-t.'''',:...;4,\N....,.,,.':,.„'...,,s .- : ' 'Y-''''' — --.4k;'`,., . ' ,:: ,,,.: ,,,,' '4',,,,h,'•-•::,,i_j,:.'4,:,..':=:.:,,i.:>,...,.3'44t:',„1,:-:,,NN: ::,-;;, -*". ..,..., '' ' \.':'-4: 1116"p101:01hg.... • .4-NINItiwit t 11, ...t ilill . „,. .: ,,,,, . ...,:,...i,,,,, r ,' .t) * ,,.....,,. -t': :.-.*-....,,:;.,:.,..,\Aq-•.,.--",-1`-.;-:,*.1. $ 1 I i 0 * I co c ill 4- Jib / / v. 1 I "75 ., ' " Fo' t). t z __,., Z4L1 C. 14 III 2. 1 ..a, g 0 , -61t ....., , . , 0 t r. e 1,,, I g , 0 ts ,41 +C 0 , 0 14. t %4 14 4., t / III, .... ' "I"" co X. 1 g 4 Q. 2 ) 1 .1 . , :;:::, . I , ., c r) v5 fro 21 t 5 % cr) 0 4g 4 i '4ti A3 C'' -4,-- ..t ,...... e kka 4.t. R t3 cx QC 0 I 11 44 t., It C`4 .‘0 0---- 2 0 II!: It f4 (1) 0 CO 10 4..„, 0 • A — 0 0 i. .. ‘.., tj .** Ct SO . / AUC 2 f I� MO !!!''j7 W Z ct- N x..cAA 0 coc i a i a. . a Z H r — m z x ca z w� * rlit plie Iii A a , '41%1 sit A ....i„,.,,1,4-1,1„*„444„, .,,....„: 4 I it I 40,1„,„,,..„ i it a �/., �...-iii :.7..., ,,_ , lit 44 �1ii I Pi I t ...V4 .4 4 NV-- --.4,14t; 411-0 i I )I,.. ` 3- N El)i''''''s I o,� ig QS i � •il a a 7 i a. ,n 7 a7 ' a ilEli'::1 � : i �na �_� j � 1 ;ir ti i1: nn n n a n �a n nn r� n ill. n . I \ x A AUG 2 6 2005 L Marine Surveys & Assessments Amy R. Leitman 521 Snagstead Way �_ _ tr , Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-4073 email: sea @cablespeed.com Summary of Related Background MARINE BIOLOGIST/CONSULTANT; Marine Surveys&Assessments,Port Townsend,WA 1991 —present Responsibilities Include: • Survey intertidal and subtidal project areas for US Fish&Wildlife,National Marine Fisheries Service,US Army Corps of Engineers,and WA Department of Fish&Wildlife permit requirements and general use habitat surveys and eelgrass surveys • Identify, quantify, and gather qualitative information of flora,fauna,substrate and other biological and physical characteristics of upland,riparian,subtidal, and wetland areas • Analyze collected data,research and analyze current literature, and write reports that provide impact analysis on habitats, species and their forage base populations • Environmental Impact Statement research and writing • Eelgrass Mitigation Plans, eelgrass transplantation,macroalgae identification,marine plant habitat delineations • Forage fish spawning habitat surveys to determine appropriate substrate matrix,and presence or absence of eggs SHELLFISH BIOLOGIST; Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, Sequim WA 1995 to 2000 Responsibilities include: • Lead Invertebrate biologist/Shellfish fisheries manager for Jamestown S'Kallam Tribe • Identify and survey subtidal harvest beds for both quantitative and qualitative data of Geoduck, Sea Urchins, Sea cucumbers,many species of clams, oysters,etc. • Research and analyze biological data for use in Shellfish Management Plans and shellfish management models • Identify,plan and implement shellfish aquaculture activities • Serve as a liaison to other Tribal, State and Federal Fisheries officials to represent the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe in technical and policy issues affecting shellfish and fisheries management • Design and coordinate fisheries research projects for both tribal and state management programs • Analyze environmental and habitat guidelines for fisheries,aquaculture and other marine related projects within the tribal arena VOCATIONAL PROGRAM DIRECTOR; Magnet Center,Port Townsend School-District, Port Townsend,WA 1992— 1995 '�' 2 Responsibilities include: • Lead Marine Trades director for$500,000.00 Magnet Center program budget • Organize,prepare and monitor budget for Marine Trades Vocational Training Program • Create,prepare and administrate instructional programs • Design and implement assessment,instructional,and evaluation procedures in marine and related technical trades classes,environmental impact analysis courses, and other marine training seminars • Access regional, state and national resources to make program efficient and successful • Represent Jefferson County and Washington State in National Magnet program analysis conferences and seminars FISHERIES BIOLOGIST; Washington Department of Fisheries,Brinnon,WA 1988—1991 Responsibilities Include: • Prepare, organize, analyze and present scientific and agency policy information to community, regional, state,and national organizations • Help create and prepare interagency Memorandums of Understanding,budgets, 5-year work plans,changes for WA Administrative Code fisheries issues,reports of scientific experiments, environmental impacts related to fisheries management and database records • Survey subtidal shellfish harvest beds for species specific quantitative information and qualitative information for associated flora and fauna • Research and design laboratory and field experiments related to aquaculture projects and other fisheries management needs • Lead management analyst for several subtidal invertebrate species for Washington State to identify needs in policy and regulation change RESEARCH ASSISTANT; California State University Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA 1985-1988 Responsibilities include: • Design and implement environmental parameter monitoring program for marine culture laboratory • Organize and maintain hatchery activity records and semi-annual report • Assist in technical training of marine culture techniques for visiting students and scientists • Assist in the maintenance and on going research for marine culture laboratory • Participate in SCUBA surveys for subtidal invertebrate seeding prrjects-- - .--W --- -- AQUACULTURE EXTENSION AGENT; Peace Corps,Democratic gepublic of Congo 1981-1984 Responsibilities include: E_ . .._! • Instruct farmers in site selection,pond design,canal systems design,construction, stocking, management, and harvesting of earthen fish ponds • Assist fish farmers in marketing procedures • Organize fisheries cooperatives for construction,problem solving,analysis and marketing of cultured fish • Facilitate and teach a monthly workshop on aquaculture topics to farmer's cooperative BLOCK ISLAND FARMS, Block Island,Rhode Island 1979-1981 Responsibilities include: • Lead biologist for oyster and mussel culture environmental testing and analysis for aquaculture program • Present current biological and experimental results to international marine conferences • Daily troubleshooting,maintenance and running of aquaculture facility Education B.S. Aquaculture/Zoology(1980)University of Rhode Island Technical Fisheries Training Program(1981)University of Oklahoma M.S.Marine Science(1988)Moss Landing Marine Laboratories,CA Forage Fish Spawning Analysis training(2002)WA Dept Fish&Wildlife Dive Training NAUI Basic Dive Certification(1980)Rhode Island PADI Research Dive Certification(1985)California Surface Supplied Air(1998)Washington DAN O2 Certification(1999)Washington WA State Certified Eelgrass,Macroalgae and Geoduck Surveyor(1988) Conference Presentations 1981-2004: Twelve presentations at National and International conferences in Aquaculture, Fisheries management,invertebrate predator-prey relationships,Abalone research,population dynamics,culture analysis and experimental gas analysis impacts, Subtidal invertebrate in-situ survey design and analysis. Conferences located in: Nova Scotia, Canada,Hawaii,Nevada, South Africa,California,Washington,Oregon,Rhode Island,Massachusetts,Mexico and Maryland Scientific Publications 1989 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 1990Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program, Olympia,WA 98501 1991 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program, Olympia,WA 98501 1992 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 1995 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 1996 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 1997 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program, Olympia,WA 98501 1998 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 1999 Geoduck Atlas,WA Dept. of Fish&Wildlife,Fish Program,Olympia,WA 98501 Contributing author as both state and tribal biologist Potential for raising Red Abalone Haliotis rufescens(Swainson)in Washington State.National Shellfisheries Association. (1990)Annual meeting publication and presentation. Predator prey interactions between a variety of predators on juvenile Geoduck seed. .National Shellfisheries Association. (1991)Annual meeting publication and presentation. The effects or gas super saturation on the behavior,growth,and mortality of red abalone,Haliotis rufescens(Swainson). Abalone of the World:Biology, Fisheries, and Culture. Edited by S.A. Shepard,M.J. Tegner,& S.A. Guzman del Proo, (1992).World Fish News publications. Professional Associations National Shellfisheries Association Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association Pacific Estuarine Research Society --, –— f Wild Olympic Salmon/North Olympic Salmon Coalition Land Trust 1 Aur 2 6 Northwest Algal Symposium Western Society of Naturalists0000 i Coastal Society k Voice Mail Log FR • OM _ �._ DATE 7 • x ° . COMPANY TIME .L ,O_�_.._ ,3 TEL. FAX • NOTE Can /. i f 460 FROM DATE COMPANY�_�.. _._. TIME TEL. _ FAX FROM DATE COMPANY TIME .__. TEL. FAX ....... NOTES',. I FROM _ _.. _.. DATE Ii COMPANY TIME TEL. ._ FAX - NOTES FROM DATE COMPANY TIME TEL. FAX ......... NOTES FROM DATE - COMPANY TIME TEL. .. .. FAX Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:41 AM To: Susan Porto; Linda Atkins Subject: FW: 850 Tala Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 FYI: Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:47 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: 850 Tala Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 Thanks Michelle. I will work with Mike to get this resolved. Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:03 PM To: Greene, Gary Cc: Susan Porto; Linda Atkins; mike @cds4you.com Subject: 850 Tala Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 Hi Gary: I spoke with Susan Porto and Linda Atkins of Environmental Health (EH) . We reviewed the revised site plan with the approved sewage disposal designed site plan that was prepared by Mike Deeney of Creative Design Solutions. According to the septic site plan, the revised driveway location will be located within the primary drainfield areas. Therefore, you'll need to contact Mike Deeney (800-395-7296 or 360-457-6353) to have him verify that the portion of the driveway to be relocated will not have an impact on the primary drainfield. Mike should also coordinate with Susan and/or Linda. I will need EH approval prior to approving the revised site plan. Should you need to contact Susan or Linda they can be reached at 360-385-9444 or emailed at the above addresses. Sorry, looked like this would be an easy one. Michelle Farfan 1 Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan©co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) 2 Michelle Farfan 7/p/6 p,yy) To: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Cc: Susan Porto; Linda Atkins; mike @cds4you.com Subject: 850 Tale Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 Hi Gary: I spoke with Susan Porto and Linda Atkins of Environmental Health (EH). We reviewed the revised site plan with the approved sewage disposal designed site plan that was prepared by Mike Deeney of Creative Design Solutions. According to the septic site plan, the revised driveway location will be located within the primary drainfield areas. Therefore, you'll need to contact Mike Deeney(800-395-7296 or 360-457-6353)to have him verify that the portion of the driveway to be relocated will not have an impact on the primary drainfield. Mike should also coordinate with Susan and/or Linda. I will need EH approval prior to approving the revised site plan. Should you need to contact Susan or Linda they can be reached at 360-385-9444 or emailed at the above addresses. Sorry, looked like this would be an easy one. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) 1 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77 55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 44,'s; WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 1027951.'\ECE I\E Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A JUL 0 3 2006 PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR Gary Greene 2242 NW Market Street,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-220-7029 Project Name: Greene Tala Shores Stream Crossing Project Description: Septic, stormwater and water utility crossing and installation and removal of a temporary 24-inch culvert and permanent installation of a bridge crossing of a Type NS Stream. PROVISIONS 1.TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin June 30, 2006 and shall be completed by November 15, 2007; Provided: work below the ordinary high water mark occurs between June 30th and November 15th of calendar year 2006 and June 1st and November 15th of the calendar year 2007, unless the Area Habitat Biologist listed below approves working outside of these dates due the presence of a completely dry stream channel. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail) from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee) or the agent/contractor no less than 3 working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Enforcement Sergeant listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail) from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee) or the agent/contractor no less than three working days prior to start of work.; and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The oattorr shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 4. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Septic System, Parcel #821151005 & 006 Stream Crossing Detail for Gary Greene and dated August 13, 2005, and Greene Residence Temporary Culvert Installation and Removal and dated June 19, 2006, and Greene Residence Site Plan modified by G.F. Greene dated June 19, 2006, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. Page 1 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal • Department of 48 Devonshire Road st FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A Septic, Stormwater Conveyance and Waterline Installation Provisions: 5. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. 6. The conduit shall be installed at sufficient depth so that the conduit cannot become exposed during future streambed scouring. 7. When using trench excavation, the trenches shall be excavated in the dry or shall be isolated from the flowing stream. Plowing, placement, and covering shall occur in a single pass of the equipment. Disturbance of the streambed as a result of the plowing operation shall be limited to the amount necessary to complete the project. 8. Trenches shall be backfilled with native material removed during the trench excavation, and the streambed shall be returned to preproject condition. 9. The conduit approach trench shall be isolated from the stream until laying of the conduit across the stream occurs. Temporary Streamflow Bypass Provisions (if necessary): 10. A temporary bypass to divert flow around the work area shall be in place prior to initiation of other work in the wetted perimeter. 11. The bypass shall be of sufficient size to pass all flows and debris for the duration of the project. 12. Prior to releasing the water flow to the project area, all conduit installation shall be completed. • 13. Upon completion of the project, all material used in the temporary bypass shall be ved' from the site and the site returned to preproject or improved conditions. Equipment Provisions: 14. Equipment used for this project may operate below the ordinary high water line, provided the drive mechanisms (wheels, tracks, tires, etc.) shall not enter or operate below the ordinary high water line. Page 2 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 `" WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 • Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 15. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities along the stream. Water Quality Provisions: 16. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. 17. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 18. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 19. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Re-vegetation Provision: 20. Alteration or disturbance of the bank and bank vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calender days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. Temporary Culvert Installation and Removal Provisions: 21. Disturbance of the streambed and banks shall be limited to that necessary to place the temporary culvert and any required channel modification associated with it. Affected streambed and bank areas outside the culvert shall be restored to preproject condition following installation of the culvert. 22. The temporary culvert shall be installed and removed in the dry or in isolation from stream flow by the installation of a bypass to divert the stream flow around the work area. Page 3 of 7 0 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 23. Imported fill which will remain in the stream after temporary culvert removal shall consist of clean, rounded, uniformly-graded gravel ranging in size from 1/4 to three inches in diameter. 24. The temporary culvert shall consist of a single barrel. 25. The temporary culvert shall not exceed 20 feet in total length. 26.The temporary culvert shall be placed in the stream at a location that will not require any excavation. 27. Approach material shall be structurally stable and be composed of material that if eroded into the stream shall not be detrimental to fish life. 28.The temporary culvert and fill shall be removed, and the disturbed bed and bank areas shall be reshaped to preproject configuration. Within seven calendar days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet(on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. Bridge Installation Provisions: 29. Excavation for and placement of the foundation and superstructure shall be outside the ordinary high water line. 30. The bridge structure shall be placed in a manner to minimize damage to the streambed and banks. 31. The bridge shall be constructed to pass the 100-year peak flow with consideration of debris likely to be encountered. 32. Structures containing concrete shall be sufficiently cured prior to contact with water to avoid leaching. Fresh concrete shall not be allowed to come into contact with state waters. - 33. Where aggregate or earth type material is used for paving or accumulates on the bri i e-,q rbs, or wheel guards shall be installed and maintained to prevent the loss of this material into 'fie * ,f 4 stream. Page 4 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal • Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PROJECT LOCATIONS Location #1 Greene Residence WORK START: June 30, 2006 1WORK END: November 15, 2007 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: • 17.0189 Unnamed Tributary 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91749 W 122.65461 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions NOTES • APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically Chapter 77.55 RCW(formerly RCW 77.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local,state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge,possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock;wateringvor bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.141 are subject to additional restrictions,conditions or revocation if rtrtient " of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action: The-- person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.301. APPEALS INFORMATION If you wish to appeal the issuance or denial of,or conditions provided in a Hydraulic Project Approval,there are informal and formal appeal processes available. Page 5 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal • Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A A.INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021, 77.55.141,77.55.181, and 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30 days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party,and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached,or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Technical Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal,a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties;or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act,Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization only),77.55.141,77.55.181,or 77.55.241: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE,Building Two- Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL, shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE,Building Two Rowe Six, P.O BQai ,- Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS results in forfeiture of all appeal rights. If there is no timely request for an appeal,the department action shall be final and unappealable. Page 6 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry ( ) P3 Habitat Biologist - _ for Director Jeff Davis 360-895-3965 WDFW CC:Michelle Farfan, Jefferson County DCD Page 7 of 7 _h• V) XI CDab \ • z c �� Z N . N S y 111 C.T1 i • c-) k) .." •° 2 °°' \ F v So a• 23 g �� p zo ! 2 5") ti c)GI p _ 1t2�5{ 1 \ 111 0m / � � � � ' J a0 � " / i o )3 ill -t r-- ir 0 -- _ i 1 io . . • . .....4 , . _______--i lo , ___ ^, r . - ri.`- , IQ5 Z� �8 -- ; \ i n i I / A3o :II *, 2 ..< g*$/// nO� '� I \ / -4 o 111 10 k-: alill- ft rIl n \ �u 19-1-------....5° / ;.,g 7".--- - / / Vd z rti v x iI \1 i w r Lil FL./ to I PA i 7 0 � i j �I /� *4IP zv i \ Ii1 b p I 1 I k v 2 0) 0 1p g\\ N\ \ _- _,711 1<\ ...\--,....„... ____:_27.., Ivy H I \ I a I I I ■ 1 I0 I IL a \ ■ / n r I CO \ ` \ / w,o i , Iv \ w 1 r ,, • \ ■ .§ ....i.... , In �® o \ \ 0 \ �,r- vao• n \ \ i 00 9"Xt C cn \ \ I �� Y CO v I m g OCv p r • / g u1-m V s rj \ e as. • co x s t cam o ? r al m \ N sa op 71_ P.0 I 94 no r r C y h , c O N t n °� r _. ,i �o U CO 2.7 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 June 19,2006 1 \ ECEI ° -L4D Ms. Michelle Farfan JUN 212006 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St JEFFERSON COUNTY OCO Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms. Farfan: I would like to make three relatively small changes to the site plan approved in conjunction with the Type 1 Land Use Permit(MLA05-00526)issued on 1/30/2006. As per the attached revised site plan dated June 19,2006 I request permission to: 1. Reroute the entrance to the driveway slightly to the south. Doing so will result in the removal of one small 8"Alder. 2. Remove two additional trees that pose a significant threat to the future structures and any vehicles parked in the parking area. Tree#14 is a 30"Alder. Tree#17 is a 28"Alder. Both trees are leaning at least 15-25 degrees in a south-southwest direction and threaten the bridge, parking area,and garage. 3. Re-route the storm water tight line to the south to avoid placing it under the foundation of the house. This will make future maintenance of the tight-line much easier and more reliable. Northwestern Territories, Inc(NTI)the preparer of the approved storm water plan has reviewed this change and has determined that it is technically feasible. It is also their opinion that this change is minor enough to be executed as a"Field Change". Please contact Mr. Bob Leach, principal owner of NTI at 360-452-8491 if you have any questions concerning this change. This change will also require that the storm water tight line be placed under the stream rather than under the pedestrian bridge. I have requested an amendment to my existing Hydraulic Project Approval(#1022795-1)from the Department of Fish and Wildlife to authorize placement of the storm water tight tine in the same trench already approved for the potable water line. I have discussed this informally with Mr.Jeff Davis at Fish and Wildlife and he has not voiced any concerns. I have forwarded a formal written request to Fish and Wildlife to amend the HPA. Also,please note that two trees were damaged during the wind storms that occurred during the 2005- 2006 winter. Tree#40 was completely up-rooted and knocked over,while tree#9 had it's top 1/3 snapped off. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or Gary.F.Greene@uscd.mil if you have any questions. Sincerely, t1wT1 & Q,Dt Gary Greene Copy: Mr.Bob Leach, Northwestern Territories, Inc Mr.Jeff Davis,WA Department of Fish and Wildlife # , • y it Michelle Farfan From: Jeff Davis [davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:29 AM To: gfgreene @bbxmail.net Cc: Randi Thurston; Michelle Farfan Subject: Re: HPA for Tala Shore Septic X-ing F-60 102795-2.pdf Gary, Your HPA is attached. Have you constructed the marine stormwater outfall yet? Let me know if you have any questions. Jeff Davis GMA/PHS Biologist WA. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Original Message From: "Gary Greene" <gfgreene @bbxmail.net> To: "Jeff Davis" <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 7:46 AM Subject: Re: HPA for Tala Shore Septic X-ing > Jeff, Don't hesitate to call if you need more info. Once completed, it would be very helpful if you could pdf/email me the amended HPA. I need to provide it to the County so that we can get the green light to start the site improvements. > Regards, Gary Original Message > From: "Jeff Davis" <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> > Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13 :40:59 -0700 > >Gary, »I received the information that you mailed to me. I will take a look at it > >next week and see if I can get the HPA modified and to you asap. Let me > >know if you have any questions. Thanks for your cooperation and timeliness. > > > >Jeff Davis > >GMA/PHS Biologist > >WA. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife > > > > Original Message > >From: "Gary Greene" <gfgreene @bbxmail.net> > >To: <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> > >Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:28 AM > >Subject: FWD: HPA for Tala Shore Septic X-ing > > > > > » Good Morning Jeff, We are getting closer to starting the site > >improvements at our property at Tala Shores. I have two questions related > >to this project: > » > » 1. The attached HPA allows us to place the potable water line and the > >septic line under the Class 5 stream in the vacinity of the foot bridge. 1 > >They would be in two separate trenches at least 10 feet apart. At the > >present time, the storm water line is suspended under the bridge and then is > >routed UNDER the concrete slab. > » > » Our contractor is recommending against placing the storm water under the > >foundation slab. He is proposing that we run the stormwater line under the > >stream about 30 feet south of the proposed foot bridge and then directly to > >the bluff, avoiding hte foundation all together. Obviously if we needed to > >conduct maintenance to the storm water lin in the future, it will be much > >easier to access if it doesn't run under the concrete slab. > » > » He would place the potable water line in this same trench. So the end > >result is that we still have two separate trenches going under the stream > > (one with sewage and the other with potable water and storm water) separted > >by apprxomately 30 ' vice the 10 ' previously approved. > » > » I have contacted NTI and asked them to take a look at the feasibitily of > >rerouting the stormwater line. I'm assuming that they will have to issue an > >amendment to our already approved Storm Water Management Plan? > >> > » Assuming that we amend the Storm Water Plan, will I need to apply for a > >new HPA, or can the existing one be modified? > » > » 2. We have also previously talked about the need to construct a temporary > >constructin bridge over the Class V Stream. The contractor is suggesting a > >large culvert covered with clean gravel fill. > » > » What is the process for getting this approved? Another HPA? > » > » Given scheduling issues, the construction of the home may take more than > >one "dry season" to complete. Is it possible to leave the construciton > >bridge in place for more than just a single dry season. It would seen to me > >that there would be less "wear and tear" on the stream to simply leave it in > >place, rather than to remove and replace it several times? > » > » Thanks for your continuing support and help. > » > » Regards, Gary > » > » > » Original Message > » From: "Jeff Davis" <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> > » Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:55:29 -0700 > » > » Gary, > » Attached is your permit for the septic line crossing at your Tala Shores > >property. Let me know if you have any questions. > » > » Jeff Davis > » Area Habitat Biologist > » WA. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife > » (360) 895-3965 > » (360) 876-1894 fax 2 > » davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov > » > » > >> > » > » > » > » > » Sent via the WebMail system at BBXMail.net > » > » > » > » > >> > > > > > Sent via the WebMail system at BBXMail.net 3 i • Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15, 2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Gary Greene 2242 NW Market Street,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-220-7029 Project Name: Greene Tale Shores Stream Crossing Project Description: Septic, stormwater and water utility crossing and installation and removal of a temporary 24-inch culvert and permanent installation of a bridge crossing of a Type NS Stream. PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin June 30, 2006 and shall be completed by November 15, 2007; Provided: work below the ordinary high water mark occurs between June 30th and November 15th of calendar year 2006 and June 1st and November 15th of the calendar year 2007, unless the Area Habitat Biologist listed below approves working outside of these dates due the presence of a completely dry stream channel. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail) from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee) or the agent/contractor no less than 3 working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Enforcement Sergeant listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail) from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee) or the agent/contractor no less than three working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 4. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Septic System, Parcel #821151005 & 006 Stream Crossing Detail for Gary Greene and dated August 13, 2005, and Greene Residence Temporary Culvert Installation and Removal and dated June 19, 2006, and Greene Residence Site Plan modified by G.F. Greene dated June 19, 2006, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. Page 1 of 7 Oil, Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A Septic, Stormwater Conveyance and Waterline Installation Provisions: 5. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. 6. The conduit shall be installed at sufficient depth so that the conduit cannot become exposed during future streambed scouring. 7. When using trench excavation, the trenches shall be excavated in the dry or shall be isolated from the flowing stream. Plowing, placement, and covering shall occur in a single pass of the equipment. Disturbance of the streambed as a result of the plowing operation shall be limited to the amount necessary to complete the project. 8. Trenches shall be backfilled with native material removed during the trench excavation, and the streambed shall be returned to preproject condition. 9. The conduit approach trench shall be isolated from the stream until laying of the conduit across the stream occurs. Temporary Streamflow Bypass Provisions (if necessary): 10. A temporary bypass to divert flow around the work area shall be in place prior to initiation of other work in the wetted perimeter. 11. The bypass shall be of sufficient size to pass all flows and debris for the duration of the project. 12. Prior to releasing the water flow to the project area, all conduit installation shall be completed. 13. Upon completion of the project, all material used in the temporary bypass shall be removed from the site and the site returned to preproject or improved conditions. Equipment Provisions: 14. Equipment used for this project may operate below the ordinary high water line, provided the drive mechanisms (wheels, tracks, tires, etc.) shall not enter or operate below the ordinary high water line. Page 2 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 15. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities along the stream. Water Quality Provisions: 16. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. 17. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 18. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 19. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Re-vegetation Provision: 20. Alteration or disturbance of the bank and bank vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calender days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. Temporary Culvert Installation and Removal Provisions: 21. Disturbance of the streambed and banks shall be limited to that necessary to place the temporary culvert and any required channel modification associated with it. Affected streambed and bank areas outside the culvert shall be restored to preproject condition following installation of the culvert. 22. The temporary culvert shall be installed and removed in the dry or in isolation from stream flow by the installation of a bypass to divert the stream flow around the work area. Page 3 of 7 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 23. Imported fill which will remain in the stream after temporary culvert removal shall consist of clean, rounded, uniformly-graded gravel ranging in size from 1/4 to three inches in diameter. 24. The temporary culvert shall consist of a single barrel. 25. The temporary culvert shall not exceed 20 feet in total length. 26. The temporary culvert shall be placed in the stream at a location that will not require any excavation. 27. Approach material shall be structurally stable and be composed of material that if eroded into the stream shall not be detrimental to fish life. 28. The temporary culvert and fill shall be removed, and the disturbed bed and bank areas shall be reshaped to preproject configuration. Within seven calendar days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. Bridge Installation Provisions: 29. Excavation for and placement of the foundation and superstructure shall be outside the ordinary high water line. 30. The bridge structure shall be placed in a manner to minimize damage to the streambed and banks. 31. The bridge shall be constructed to pass the 100-year peak flow with consideration of debris likely to be encountered. 32. Structures containing concrete shall be sufficiently cured prior to contact with water to avoid leaching. Fresh concrete shall not be allowed to come into contact with state waters. 33. Where aggregate or earth type material is used for paving or accumulates on the bridge, curbs, or wheel guards shall be installed and maintained to prevent the loss of this material into the stream. Page 4 of 7 ,- ; Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26,2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PROJECT LOCATIONS Location #1 Greene Residence WORK START: June 30, 2006 (WORK END: November 15, 2007 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 17.0189 Unnamed Tributary 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91749 W 122.65461 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions NOTES APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically Chapter 77.55 RCW(formerly RCW 77.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local,state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.141 are subject to additional restrictions,conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.301. APPEALS INFORMATION If you wish to appeal the issuance or denial of,or conditions provided in a Hydraulic Project Approval,there are informal and formal appeal processes available. Page 5 of 7 • Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26, 2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021, 77.55.141,77.55.181,and 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30 days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party, and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached,or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Technical Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal,a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties;or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act,Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization only), 77.55.141, 77.55.181,or 77.55.241: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two- Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two- Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS results in forfeiture of all appeal rights. If there is no timely request for an appeal,the department action shall be final and unappealable. Page 6 of 7 • �, Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:June 26, 2006 Control Number: 102795-2 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2007 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry ( ) P3 Habitat Biologist - - �� for Director Jeff Davis 360-895-3965 WDFW CC: Michelle Farfan, Jefferson County DCD Page 7 of 7 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:58 AM To: Michelle Farfan; bob @nti4u.com Subject: FW: Re: HPA for Tala Shore Septic X-ing FYI Original Message From: "Jeff Davis" <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:59:32 -0700 Gary, I can just modify your existing permit to reflect the changes in the plans. If the culvert is to remain over winter, then it will need to be equal to the stream channel width and able to pass the 100-year storm flow and debris likely to be encountered within that storm event. I will also need plans for the culvert. Overall, it really isn't that big of an effort to modify the HPA as long as I have the plans and a brief summary similar to the one you sent in your email. Jeff Davis GMA/PHS Biologist WA. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Original Message From: "Gary Greene" <gfgreene @bbxmail.net> To: <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: FWD: HPA for Tala Shore Septic X-ing > Good Morning Jeff, We are getting closer to starting the site improvements at our property at Tala Shores. I have two questions related to this project: > 1. The attached HPA allows us to place the potable water line and the septic line under the Class 5 stream in the vacinity of the foot bridge. They would be in two separate trenches at least 10 feet apart. At the present time, the storm water line is suspended under the bridge and then is routed UNDER the concrete slab. > Our contractor is recommending against placing the storm water under the foundation slab. He is proposing that we run the stormwater line under the stream about 30 feet south of the proposed foot bridge and then directly to the bluff, avoiding hte foundation all together. Obviously if we needed to conduct maintenance to the storm water lin in the future, it will be much easier to access if it doesn't run under the concrete slab. 1 > He would place the potable water line in this same trench. So the end result is that we still have two separate trenches going under the stream (one with sewage and the other with potable water and storm water) separted by apprxomately 30 ' vice the 10' previously approved. > I have contacted NTI and asked them to take a look at the feasibitily of rerouting the stormwater line. I'm assuming that they will have to issue an amendment to our already approved Storm Water Management Plan? > Assuming that we amend the Storm Water Plan, will I need to apply for a new HPA, or can the existing one be modified? > 2. We have also previously talked about the need to construct a temporary constructin bridge over the Class V Stream. The contractor is suggesting a large culvert covered with clean gravel fill. > What is the process for getting this approved? Another HPA? > Given scheduling issues, the construction of the home may take more than one "dry season" to complete. Is it possible to leave the construciton bridge in place for more than just a single dry season. It would seen to me that there would be less "wear and tear" on the stream to simply leave it in place, rather than to remove and replace it several times? > Thanks for your continuing support and help. > Regards, Gary Original Message > From: "Jeff Davis" <davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov> > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:55:29 -0700 > Gary, > Attached is your permit for the septic line crossing at your Tala Shores property. Let me know if you have any questions. > Jeff Davis > Area Habitat Biologist > WA. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife > (360) 895-3965 > (360) 876-1894 fax > davisjpd @dfw.wa.gov > Sent via the WebMail system at BBXMail.net 2 Sent via the WebMail system at BBXMail.net 3 Page 1 of 4 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 1:36 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Michelle, have you had a chance to correct the other permits? Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene a(�,uscg.mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:02 PM To: Greene, Gary Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Hi Gary: As we discussed on the phone, I did leave the other conditions relating to landslide as more of a public disclosure that there is still a landslide hazard area and that because the buffer requirement was inadvertently left off of the SPAAD does not eliminate the landslide itself. So its meant to be more informative than to take action on. Thanks you, I will correct the other permits but I can't get to them until next week as I am in meetings all afternoon today and not in on Monday's or Fridays. I should have them done by Wednesday next week and in the mail to you. Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:50 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Michelle, I received the revised 5/2/06"Special Conditions for Case#BLDG005-00557 in the mail. This revision eliminated the requirement for a 50'vegetative buffer for the landslide hazard and in its place referenced Jerry Smith's letter of January 21, 2003. However, there are still several remaining conditions that talk about the requirement to properly mark the landslide hazard area and associated buffers both temporarily during construction, and permanently after construction. Per our phone conversation on May 02, 2006, I just wanted to 6/20/2006 Page 2 of 4 confirm that those remaining marking requirements are superfluous, and that in deed there is no longer any requirement to have any buffer extending westward from the bluff as depicted on the approved building plan? Although eliminated from Permit 5-00557, the requirement for a 50' vegetative buffer from the top or edge of the landslide hazard area remains a condition of my other active building permits for the Detached Garage (005- 00558), Foot bridge (05-00570), and rock retaining wall (05-00594). It is also contained in the Type 1 Land Use Permit(05-00526) To avoid any confusion in the future, I would like to have the landslide hazard buffer requirement also eliminated from these 4 additional documents. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greeneauscg.mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:20 AM To: Greene, Gary; Stacie Hoskins; Al Scalf Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE -Tale Shores Building Permit Gary: That was addressed in the corrected version referencing Jerry's letter. Not required per the SPAAD approval. I would recommend submitting a revised site plan identifiying the new driveway location so that it can be reviewed and approved with a footnote identifying the location of the two trees that had been knocked down. I have mailed the reviseed condition to you as well as provided a revised copy for the building file. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:08 AM To: Michelle Farfan; Stacie Hoskins; Al Scalf Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE -Tale Shores Building Permit Hi Michelle, 30' is definitely more palatable then 50'. But what about the fact that the approved SPAAD had 6/20/2006 Page 3 of 4 NO set back requirement? And the fact that when I asked for clarification from the County, I was told there was no set back requirement? Also, how should I address the minor change in driveway location and the fact that two trees have been knocked down by winter storms? Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greeneauscg.mil From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 8:45 AM To: Stacie Hoskins; Greene, Gary; Al Scalf Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Hi Gary: I had a chance to review your MLA file and I believe here's is what happened: The Code requires a minimum 30 foot vegetative buffer from top or toe of a bank on a landslide hazard area. I inadvertently typed in "50 foot"as that was the required geotech setback not the buffer. I have corrected the setback in our permit data base and will send you a new set of revised conditions. Sorry for any inconvenience. Thanks. Michelle Farfan project planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (Fax) Original Message From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:04 PM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Hi Gary, We did receive your letter. I'll speak with Michelle tomorrow, review the file and update you then. Thank you for your patience. 6/20/2006 Page 4 of 4 Sincerely, Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:03 AM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Good Morning Stacie, On April 24th I mailed the attached letter to Mr. Scalf. I would like to confirm that the County received it, and request to know your anticipated timeline for responding. Also, on our approved site plan we identified which trees were being removed and which trees were being retained. During the most recent winter storms, two of the trees identified to be retained were blown down. Tree#40 was completely blown down with the entire root ball coming out of the ground. Tree number 10 had the top 1/3 blown off. Finally,we have determined that our driveway as depicted on the approved site plan will not allow adequate access for the construction vehicles. There is also concern that fire trucks will also not be able to make the turn. Therefore we have devised a new routing that still avoids the septic area and only requires the removal of one small softwood tree. Do I need to some how revise our site plan to reflect the fact that nature has removed all or part of these two trees, and that we are going to very slightly reroute the driveway? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene(a uscg.mil 6/20/2006 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 DATE ISSUED: I/30/0to DATE EXPIRES:I f3Of0 MLA NUMBER: MLA05-00526 PROJECT PLANNER: M FARFAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU FOOT BRIDGE ROCK RETAINING WALL SDP exemption to collect and tightline stormwater water over shoreline bluff. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 821 151 005 & 006 in Section 15, Township 28, Range 01 East, WM, Located at 850 Tala Shore Dr, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 CONDITIONS: 1.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 2.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc.was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 3.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 4.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream &landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 6.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 8.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 9.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM. 10.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3)gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 13.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 14.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. P q fY g Y Y 15.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 16.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 17.) An engineered Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 18.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 19.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 20.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 21.) Not more than two (2)unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code(UDC)Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13)or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage)yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). 22.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 23.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 24.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 25.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 26.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 27.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 28.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 29.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical.Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 30.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 31.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration,which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 32.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 33.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 34.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 35.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. 36.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING,AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping"OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 37.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS,AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 38.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 39.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING,AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 40.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS, AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 41.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED, THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, 42.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY, TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. 43.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY,AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER(WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES)CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER(WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES)THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 44.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL,ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS, THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. 45.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206)459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR(206)753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 46.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE"DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 47.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys &Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. 48.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan signed by WDFW on January 6, 2006 and signed by applicant on January 10, 2006. 49.) Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 28, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ). 3.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area)has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 7.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteratior of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 8.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera)Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 9.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 10.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polic) (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23,2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 11.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 12.) The revised site plan received on December 27, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated January 30, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 13.) This approval is for a single family residence, detached garage with ADU, foot bridge, and rock retaining wall only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 14.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 15.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However, the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 16.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance(ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004& OTH03-0012)were finaled. A septic permit(SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit(BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence(BLD05-0557). A building permit for a (BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. A shoreline permit(SDP05-0026)for a tightline to the beach will be issued with the residence permit. 17.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006 &821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. 18.) The parcel is served by an individual on-site well. 19.) The proposal was reviewed for consistency with the Shoreline Management Master Program Section 3.402.5 and found to be consistent. The proposal is (1)a single family residence and a detached garage, (2)does not exceed 35 feet in height, (3)does not involve over-water construction and is located landward of the OHWM, (4)and meets all required setbacks as set forth in said SMMP. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8,2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline,or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit fora listed species "taking," even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at(206)526-6613, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at (503)231-6121. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information r: - -d to judical appeals see UDC Section 8.5.2. l AO Illnl UDC A. inistrator VIII DRAFT - NOT A VALID PERMIT JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 DATE ISSUED: I(3 D6 O (o DATE EXPIRES: 1`3 0(0 MLA NUMBER: MLA05-00526 PROJECT PLANNER: M FARFAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU FOOT BRIDGE ROCK RETAINING WALL SDP exemption to collect and tightline stormwater water over shoreline bluff. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 821 151 005 & 006 in Section 15, Township 28, Range 01 East, WM, Located at 850 Tala Shore Dr, Port Ludlow,WA 98365 CONDITIONS: 1.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 2.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc.was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 3.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 4.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream &landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 6.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 8.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 9.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM. 10.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has-been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3)gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 13.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 14.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 15.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 16.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 17.) An engineered Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 18.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 19.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 20.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 21.) Not more than two (2)unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC)Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13)or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage)yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). 22.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 23.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 24.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 25.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 26.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 27.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 28.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 29.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical.Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 30.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 31.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 32.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 33.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 34.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 35.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. 36.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING, AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping"OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 37.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS,AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 38.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 39.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING,AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 40.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS,AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 41.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED, THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, 42.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY, TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. 43.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY,AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER(WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES) CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER(WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES)THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 44.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL,ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS, THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. 45.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS,WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206)459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR(206)753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 46.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE, EROSION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 47.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys &Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. 48.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan signed by WDFW on January 6, 2006 and signed by applicant on January 10, 2006. 49.) Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 28, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ). 3.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area)has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OW HM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 7.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteratior of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 8.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose(Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 9.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 10.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polio (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 11.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 12.) The revised site plan received on December 27, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated January 30, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 13.) This approval is for a single family residence, detached garage with ADU, foot bridge, and rock retaining wall only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 14.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 15.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However, the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 16.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance (ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004 &OTH03-0012)were finaled. A septic permit(SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit(BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence(BLD05-0557). A building permit for a (BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. A shoreline permit(SDP05-0026)for a tightline to the beach will be issued with the residence permit. 17.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006 & 821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. 18.) The parcel is served by an individual on-site well. 19.) The proposal was reviewed for consistency with the Shoreline Management Master Program Section 3.402.5 and found to be consistent. The proposal is (1)a single family residence and a detached garage, (2)does not exceed 35 feet in height, (3)does not involve over-water construction and is located landward of the OHWM, (4)and meets all required setbacks as set forth in said SMMP. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local,state, and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline,or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit fora listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at(206)526-6613,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at (503)231-6121. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see UDC Section 8.5.2. U d istrato Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-794-2794 January 11,2006 r- ‘11/ Ms. Michell Farfan Department of Community Development JAN 1 2 2006 I 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Ms. Farfan: : .rL` :'EAT Please find attached a copy of our signed and approved Bald Eagle Site Management Plan for our property located at 850 Tala Shore Drive (Case# BLD05-00557). I believe with the submission of this plan,we have provided all of the information requested in your letter of October 28,2005. We look forward to receiving our building permit. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or at GFGreene@bbxmail.net. Sincerely, f V� / Gary F.Greene Greene, Gary From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us on behalf of Michelle Farfan [mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:58 AM To: Greene, Gary F. Subject: RE: GREENE Project- 850 Tala Shore Drive Hi Gary: I did receive the email. I check with Peter and there are two drainage plans that you submitted on August 26, 2005. I also spoke with Stacie regarding the Hearing Examiner decision that requried the grading component. She recalls your conversation and is satisified that the grading component is not required. When Peter looked in the building file for the drainage plans, he also found 2 JARPA applications (of which were never routed to me) . This is for the tightline to the beach. A fee of $294 is required for the Shoreline Exemption permit. Please submit at your earliest convenience. Additionally, the only other item that we need is the Eagle Management Plan. Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development - p 621 Sheridan [t Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 JAN 1 2 2006 I 360-379-4473 (fax) Original Message O M.MENT J From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] --- Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 7:53 AM To: Greene, Gary F. ; Michelle Farfan Cc: Betty Greene Subject: RE: GREENE Project - 850 Tala Shore Drive Good Morning Michelle, Could you please confirm that you received the below email, and let us know if we need to resubmit the Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, and/or a "Grading Component" . Thanks, Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil 1 From: Greene, Gary F. Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:04 PM all To: 'Michelle Farfan' A,„, Cc: 'Betty Greene' Subject: GREENE Project - 850 Tala Shore Drive tLOPMENT 4 Hi Michelle, I just received your letter dated October 28, 2005 and have a couple of questions regarding the additional information that you requested. When I applied for the building permit, I provided Peter Bonyun with a Professionally Engineered "Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan" . It was prepared by David Hanna of Northwestern Territories, Inc. dated 8/22/2005. This plan includes a tight line to the beach along with proposed sediment control devices. Please let me know if this document is incomplete in some manner. If by chance it has been misplaced, I can provide you with another copy. During a 1 July 2005 conference call with Stacie Hoskins, we discussed the requirement for a "grading component" . It was my understanding from Stacie that a Grading Plan would not be required because we are proposing less than 500 cubic yards of earth moving activity. Our existing site plan includes grade elevations and I think you will see that the site is relatively flat, and will not require significant grading. Could you please confirm the requirement for a grading component? If a grading component is required, could you provide me with guidance on what specifically needs to be included in this plan. Finally what specifically needs to be revised on the site plan dated August 26, 2005? I believe the proposed tight line is already depicted on this plan. Back on 26 August 2003 I sent a letter to Shelly Ament at WDFW requesting preparation of an Eagle Management Plan. I guess she is back logged, but just last week she assured me that she will start working on our Plan. I hope to have it completed by early December. Please let me know what additional information is required. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILD BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN r- RCW 77.12.655 WAC 232-12-292 JAN 1 2 2006 EAGLE TERRITORY: Tala Point #689 Applicant Property Gary and Betty Greene Tax Parcels#821151005 and #821151006, 2442 NW Market St., #166 Township 28 North, Range 1 East, Section 15, Seattle, WA 98107 SE '/4 of NE 1/4, Jefferson County. Pending Activity Residential development: Installation of a driveway and septic system. Construction of a single- family residence and detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit. FACTORS CONSIDERED 1) Landowners goals were considered through a review of proposed site development. One site visit was conducted on the property with the landowners in 2002. They were previously notified that a Bald Eagle Management Plan would be required for the property. During the site visit recommendations were made to allow development while protecting the significant eagle habitat on the property. No finalized site development plan was reviewed during this initial meeting. The finalized site development plan was recently provided with a copy of the Master Permit Application. A few phone conversations were conducted with the landowners to review the proposed development. 2) Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through time, current surrounding habitat conditions, a review of other eagle plans developed for the territory, and the current status of the population and scientific literature concerning bald eagle habitat protection. BACKGROUND The Tala Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory is located in Jefferson County, east of Port Ludlow along the Hood Canal(Figure 1). The recent history of the Tala Point territory has been one of conversion from a semi-remote timbered peninsula to a increasingly subdivided area where a. considerable portion of the suitable bald eagle habitat has been altered by timber clearing and residential development. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) has been monitoring this territory since 1983. A total of four different nest trees have been documented in the territory(Figure 2). Nest tree#1 is located on the eastern side of Tala Point, 4000 feet south of the northern tip of the point. The nest tree is 600 feet west of the shoreline along the Hood Canal. This nest was first reported in 1983. The nest tree is a grand fir tree that was reported as • dying. The nest produced two young in 1983 and one young in 1990. During the windstorms in December 1990,the top of the tree broke off below the multiple top. Landowners in the area reported an osprey nested in the tree in 1989 and there appeared to be competition between the osprey and eagles for the nest site during 1990. A nest structure did exist on the broken top of Nest Tree#1. An osprey pair nested in this nest during the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons. Nest Tree#2 is located approximately 300 feet south and slightly east of Nest Tree#1. This nest was also reported in 1983. This nest was located in the top of a Douglas fir tree. A total of seven young were produced in this nest from 1984 to 1992. During the annual survey for eagle activity on April 14, 1993 the nest was no longer present in the tree. In September 1995, nearby landowners reported observing new sticks in this tree. During the April 1996 aerial survey a new nest occupied by a pair of osprey was documented in this tree. Nest Tree#3 was discovered on the western side of Tala Point during the 1993 aerial survey. This nest was located on the top of a double-topped grand fir tree which is within 100 feet of two houses which had been recently constructed. No young were produced at the nest during the 1993 nesting season. During the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons a single young eaglet was produced in this nest tree each year. An adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on this nest on April 13, 1996 but it was later confirmed that the eagles failed at their nesting attempt. This nest has been destroyed and there is currently only a few recant sticks remaining in the tree. The Tala Point bald eagle pair constructed Nest#4 prior to the 1997 nesting season. This nest was documented during an aerial survey conducted in April of 1997. The nest tree is located on the west side of Tala Point, approximately.7 miles northwest of the location of Nest Tree#2. This nest is located along the shoreline in a dominant broken-topped Douglas fir tree. The WDFW observed an adult bald eagle in incubation posture on this nest during the 1997 aerial survey. One young was produced at the nest during the 1997 nesting season. The WDFW documented that the bald eagle pair had failed at their nesting attempts at Nest#4 for the 1998 and 1999 nesting seasons. The eagles were confirmed nesting in Nest#4 during the 2000 nesting season. On Jun 15, 2000 it was confirmed by WDFW that one eaglet was successfully produced at the nest. During the 2001 and 2002 nesting seasons, Nest #4 was documented as the active nest. Two young were documented in the nest during the 2001 season. Due to funding constraints the WDFW was unable to conduct an aerial survey in June of 2002 so the number of young produced at the nest for this season is unknown. No aerial survey of the territory was conducted in 2003 so it is unknown if the eagle pair actively nested at Nest #4 once again. During a site visit to the area in 2003, the WDFW observed that a few new sticks were located in the tree, which previously contained Nest#3. The landowners who live on the property have • reported seeing adult bald eagles occasionally at this nest tree. The nesting activity for the 2.004 season is unknown. During an aerial survey conducted on April 5, 2005, an adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on Nest#4. Two adult eagles were also observed perched on a recently repaired Nest#2. This observation confirms that there are two eagle pairs occupying the Tala Point area. The WDFW Data Systems staff has been notified to split the Tala Point Territory into two distinct territories. The east side of the point, containing Nest#2, will be referred to the Tala Shores Bald Eagle territory in the future. Productivity surveys were not conducted this season so the number of young produced at Nest#4 is unknown. The osprey pair was observed on their nest within the Tala Shores Territory later in April so it is believed bald eagle abandoned their nesting attempt at Nest#2 for the 2005 season. JAN 1 2 2006 1 Gary and Betty Greene own two high bank waterfront parcels of property within the documented Tala Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory(Figure 3). They purchased each.66-acre parcel on the east side of Tala Point in 2002. During the process of the feasibility study for the property they were referred to the Department of Fish and Wildlife for consultation about a Bald Eagle Management Plan. Consultation with WDFW took place prior to the actual purchase of the property. A site visit was conducted on the property. Specific conditions of the management plan were discussed in coordination with review of the proposed site development. The parcels are located southeast of the tree which contains the documented bald eagle Nest Tree#2. The nest tree is approximately 384 feet from the west property line(Figure 3). The nest tree is visible from some locations of the Greene property. The lot presently contains a mix of mostly conifer trees with a small component of hardwoods. Some large mature Douglas fir and grand fir trees conifer trees are present on the property. There is fairly dense under story vegetation throughout the entire property. Important bald eagle perching habitat has been documented along the shoreline of the property. Other significant eagle habitat that exists on the property includes the buffering habitat around the nest tree and all remaining screening vegetation between the nest tree and any proposed home location. There is a documented creek that is located within the eastern portion of the property. The landowners have obtained all required permits to construct a bridge over this creek. WDFW Habitat Biologist Jeff Davis was present during the site visit conducted in 2002 to provide recommendation for protection of the creek. The Greene property presently contains no existing structures. The landowners now intend to initiate plans for development of the property. They have submitted a Master Permit Application to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development and will soon be submitting for septic and building permits. They propose to install a new septic system along the western property line(Figure 4). They propose to install a driveway on the property that will initiate from Tala Shores Drive in the northwest corner of the property and will terminate at a parking area located just west of the bridge (Figure 5). The proposed driveway and septic drainfield have been located to avoid the removal of all conifers, with the exception of one small western hemlock tree. Mr. and Mrs. Greene are proposing to construct a 2-bedroom single-family residence on the property just east of the creek(Figure 5). The residence is located approximately 614 feet from the nest tree. They will also be constructing a detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit above this garage structure. This building is proposed for construction directly south of the parking area and is located approximately 530 feet southeast of the documented nest tree(Figure 5). The landowners and consulting engineers have proposed a site development plan that requires minimal tree removal on the property. They followed the WDFW recommendation to conduct a tree survey of the property and have situated proposed development to protect as many trees as possible on the site. Very few significant trees will need to be removed for installation of the homesite and garage. A total of 5 conifer trees will need to be removed for construction of the residence. Fortunately, only one of the larger mature conifer trees on the property, a 24-inch western red cedar, will have to be removed for the proposed development. A small alder tree is the only tree that will need to be removed for construction of the detached garage. Significant mature conifer trees along the shoreline and within the southern 1/3 of the property will be retained. The landowners intend to obtain permits for the septic system---71— - installation and construction of the garage w/ADU in the next few months. They will comm,<-1�---ice • JAN 1 2 `2006 these development activities in the Spring/Summer of 2006. The primary residence will be constructed at a later time in the future. The intent of this plan is to allow for the proposed development of the Greene property while maintaining the long-term integrity of the documented Tala Point Bald Eagle Territory. A concern of the WDFW is the protection of the buffering habitat around the nest tree,bald eagle perching habitat, and potential alternate nest trees which exist on the property. Previous land clearing in the area may have removed valuable buffering habitat around the nest tree and known bald eagle perch trees or potential nest trees. The clearing could have also increased the risk of blow-down to the nest tree and adjacent significant habitat. Timing restrictions will be recommended to minimize disturbance during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season only if an active bald eagle nest is documented within 800 feet of the proposed development project. The planting of conifer seedlings will insure replacement trees for habitat previously removed, along with providing supplemental buffering of the nest tree and future bald eagle habitat. The landowners have exhibited a desire to protect the local eagle pair and the significant bald eagle habitat that is located on the property. CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to protect bald eagles and their habitat: 1) The proposal to install a septic system on the property, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 4). 2) The proposal to construct a driveway and a new 2-bedroom residence, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed (Figure 5). 3) The proposal to construct a detached garage with an 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 5). 4) All trees shall be retained on the property except for those trees in the path of the driveway, building/garage envelope, and septic system. All trees proposed for removal on the property are shown on attached Figure 5. 5) The proposal to remove understory vegetation and selected trees within the areas proposed for development shown on Figure 5 shall be allowed. All clearing shall be in compliance with Jefferson County regulations, the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, and the Hydraulics permit developed for the property. 6) The selective removal/trimming of understory vegetation, the selective removal of hardwood trees, and the limbing of conifer trees shall be allowed to achieve and maintain water views in the future. No more than 30% of the live crown of a conifer tree shall be removed. 7) Danger trees may be removed if trees are identified as hazardous by a professional forester or certified arborist. A written report from the forester/arborist must be submitted to the WDFW R JA N 1 2 2006 jj� before approval to remove the hazard trees is granted. A tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals may be removed without a report. 8) It is recommended that no heavy equipment operation, clearing, tree cutting, outside home construction, or burning shall occur during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 -August 15 of any given year. Timing restrictions shall not be required for a given year if it may be determined that the eagle pair are not actively nesting at the nest or within 800 feet of the property. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1,then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys to determine nesting status must be conducted by a qualified biologist. * Special note: The WDFW is no longer requiring timing restrictions but has requested that the landowner work cooperatively to minimize disturbance during the nesting season. The landowner shall contact WDFW if any heavy equipment work or outside construction activities are proposed during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season. The landowner and WDFW shall develop a plan to minimize disturbance and potential impacts to the eagles. 9) The WDFW recommends no discharge of firearms, fireworks, or explosives during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 - August 15 of any given year. 10) A total of two dozen(24) live conifer tree seedlings shall be established on the property. The seedlings shall be: - At least 2.0 age class. - A mix of Douglas fir, grand.fir, and western red cedar. - Planted within one year of home completion. - At least 12 of the conifer seedlings shall be planted within the NW portion of the property to supplement screening of the nest from proposed development. Other seedlings shall be planted in areas determined by the landowner. 11) No further subdivision of the property shall be allowed. JUSTIFICATION The landowners were granted approval to develop property located within 400 feet of an identified bald eagle nest tree due to the fact that the tree containing Nest#2 is located on the adjacent property. The WDFW recognizes that the landowner be granted reasonable use of the property. The WDFW worked closely with the landowner to minimize impacts of proposed development. The landowner has agreed to comply with recommended timing restrictions to \v/i minimize disturbance to nesting eagles. The landowner has made a diligent effort to minimize tree -- JAN 1 2 2006 removal on the property and will be planting conifer seedlings to improve screening and provide future bald eagle habitat. DURATION OF PROTECTION This plan applies to the landowner who signs the plan. If the ownership changes, the new landowner may sign the plan or request a new one to reflect a change in land use. Since eagles return to the same traditional use areas each year, the conditions of this plan shall apply indefinitely unless a breeding territory has been unoccupied by a breeding pair of bald eagles for 5 consecutive years. If the breeding territory is unoccupied by a bald eagle pair for 5 consecutive years,then the WDFW biologist and the landowner should evaluate the continued need for protection of the bald eagle habitat. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1, then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys shall be done by a qualified wildlife biologist. Please contact the WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do not assume that the conditions of this plan no longer apply. REVIEW AND AMENDMENT This plan will be subject to the following review and amendment procedures. The plan may be reviewed periodically by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)to determine whether: 1)the plan requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances; or, 2)the terms of the plan comply with applicable laws and regulations; or, 3) the parties to the plan are complying with its terms. APPEAL PROCEDURE In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292(7.1)-(7.3), the landowner may request a formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW, and the Model Rules of Procedure, Chapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed with the Department within 20 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal request shall clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for the appeal. COMPLIANCE Failure to comply with this plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. However, compliance with this plan does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal, state or local laws. This plan applies only to the proposed land use listed above. Any other propo alc..may be subject____ to a different set of conditions. It is the landowner's responsibility to notify th Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) of any new proposed land use activities. JAN 1 2 Lv��u6 - 3PMEh r_J Plan drafted by Shelly Ament, Wildlife Biologist, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 1933, Sequim, WA. 98382. (360) 681-4276. • III JAN 1 2 2006 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH and WILDLIFE Bald Eagle Site Management Agreement On behalf of the people of the State of Washington,to which its wildlife belongs,the following agreement is hereby enacted for the purpose of protecting Bald eagles and their habitats. The Landowners and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife agree to the conservation measures described in the attached Site Management Plan. Site Name: Tala Point #689 Legal Description of proposed project: T28N,R1E, Section 15 The undersigned hereby agree to the terms of the Bald Eagle Site Management Plan. 2 1U 06' )/�Ctn/. Nit, t 1) Gory Gfro4fve, 2) C7Yeeri ._ andow er(Signature) Date Landown r(Print) fib-- d11.2 NllJ/ meky-if 21 / Phone Number Address 6e2/14 WA' 9&'!07 City, State, Zip The State of Washington,Department of Fish and Wildlife , -14,,457 'No 6 egional Program Manager Date "hap. £r I-4--0(, Se77ersar�. Wildlif /Biologist Date Region County a2. Priority Inspected By Date 1 ? 2006 1 1 ,'r'..'cN1 c---- -------- iT . . R 1 W 45'11 450 1 550 R 1 E :1 f. -,,-,.........=...=..........o...c-1.■ Lake 21%) PM 1 !I glita , ... ' tfl,.till.Bc, r4::...7,44,,,•,,,74....')g41,47,tva..t.r.-Y1.17,1::. - , ,_ -' Austin , ,. i - .--45c-1.0"-....--4"WA!•,, . ,.-' •..,1, :„, ', '- ,Le.r,h1EN1 i . j , 4.„, .1111A•ai auk _ MI .....: .' ,-i..2iitif.:11.,-..c7,,,,k,,./titi.,,,r-,-1,- :1;4,5 •:, • ,.. -,-27,--..-----,---- , ,f Mir 1 1 .11 lelkill1/4 riaglialestlft.C;(-!:. 2:‘•,...,„ " ; . 1 ' ,. * t 0 , Beau At ,,, Double Bluf -, Ar\kbbs L.Iitia IMO II Yld lillikiairei,,..,y, .. 4?"..;-,54: :P"-...!,;;'''.4-s",%9-Slt ''.44-, .- .,,..2 L -4w1•140 4 sin _ ,,,,,,,..,„ .. -4.- ,, ,, , ,, „.7,„. A' ■ MilffiratirdaiP,%'411/af Y 1Fi rir ‘b■alfie, I - , lip, lwi / 4 ct,1 illW 40 • ■p _. r• A P 12 ,_ Niiima ) illirira ' . . 4 '' .res]ri ' / 41. ti J j 1 4 7 ilk ' ';' , 111117,4 h.AP1p..,• b •,-°".:;e71 -I-- -4 4. '1 1 a r- av . ingazo1144441:ii," '''' ''''' ' --4''' '47:_„: - ' ' ' '.'. : Hi' iiIiiiinik woic -3 ■ . _ , _. _:-____it wilorm i;. \- rilh, -,.;,,..Ludlow L 13 , < ,, 1 f ■*1 1 Ohis.#9,, HorfeSh•e 1 J 41110EVP311 - . ' (.-- --.'h/, .-,-"' -:- , -, ' li ---11 t_ 111...M. • alle I Ha e,,311t17 1 -11:16;..„ Sank Sh7111111lHoP 30 r j At' rli■ Tr 26 ,,. .../4. :, -annop k c., , ,_,1 % „2...?,/ , r ' Lak- 25 1 I :lila "A . Ilh 11110 imi!L ' •. (1-/8.4.:4,1,:::;,-.-,--,' .. -2. ,;,-,-,' . Nirtma tor" En ,..-, ,, ; ,,, - , . ii ini .s , peill111011k 1 R°111131 i , ra ; )4 / dr IA.11 33 . retiltil I 36 i ' -''',-l',.•■,:pt. 'I ' '' ';.,,' ,'t,-4.,,i-, wEIVI bil - "'Il 11111111111111 „ ■■111IIIIIIIIIIIN i. Migibrii I , 0 i Lake . ta....• ...,-.„.....rwilt..,_ [in'T?P9q, , ; .- -,...'t.,. .:,ila- ''''.. • , Ip7 y IlawinitkiAl li t e,_,.....,,wl•y,,,:-,'..•:', 4: 7 L-J •\ „Selsbury ''`'', ,:',' 5‘ ., lik 111 .., :Hl KlitHrtc - - . '- ' ' Pojna-reekelete mil, . „..4 I I / • ' Point'tmi-.111. ' Mj` ■-&- -A!: illnuipit " 11 j ,‘Lost ,..". Lak; 1 i I Alk limidlidit ___ ___ 0 , ir .- • - ;1.: ' DI ' Ill 144-11Ipf , , , . . 01 op, ,,-.1674k 1 r ' -• 1 111111111(.1 111'1. Ali ...,A1 ilium • „,,,,,,„ ,.._ II i ' • . liliwil g ; , 1 Irfr ri9 ■ - , , iittij 1.9 -... , , Miller II likA . , ... _..,...,..„ ,i. i • ,,,, ' -..t, ■ —11.4 1 ' ,. IP/-7alim 6101,;(14' :.':'... '>'''' 1 11, I ! ■ . ■ o ' . .41,,,, 111.1101111bir:,do,1 '111111P25 30 i1 . . ,;-4,-, -. .-:.42 LPIli (IMI. IY26 • ',..: ., 1"".4" w FIGURE 1. The location of the Tula Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory Jefferson County 33 id 11ifiiii money nu; • Tilli ,&■21.0 L::... ' i ' "- ' 1 o •g Hill Rd sir 4, Ile- rle, CV I 1 7 n r 1 Roy ii, 2 gr , ' . 4 k - - SMENT 6 j N COUNTY AT PG 78 R3 ION NNE LOW DELO 4712286 PORT USGS QUAD 4712.''. .-...., E 689) ENCIES '.' Ry(OCCURRENCE lusiF;LCONSIST ......../ F TERRITO--- - EF°14riti*;:1- REPORT- T BALD EAGLE 1E FSIEEEL D MAP AND POIN• ISHOwl/mREGIO FOR NAA.FIELD TALA 526000 E .., ., .„, COMPARE THIS MAP .c)6 YOIWUPRESII PERSONAL/REGIONAL :=,----.;, '. :,%'',,,,, ,;tt'''''''''''' :-!-..:i7.'''.. it*-- i*....-: '. 1;714.717,i,:•-'1'•--'I''--- • ...-"'i',:es.,,t,.&•iii.:',-... l'! ..r.,t..e=-._,--..: 0 4,.- -, ! .:::•:;,:,,.4.-.-;i.:..:.4 _.., .„,,-;::-.1.,:=1.:•:if--.:- •--.„.• ,: ,, 52500°E ...;;;;;-"7, ,..„.::::,•,i,:iiit,::It':•;..:,; 4..:., ,n'.3.,-,4, ,,!,..---•:•, ..--• ''':- ,..---, d:- -'1'.0-!---L:•':.:-' 1=',T-.::-,:L ---=-• .'-• -•=- •-::- ..\::--::.-- 11 l':-..i3!•::?114''''''':-"tri--i:...: 1:444-'3: -';:r.;1'3'- .-4::611;4/.,-,:_•:,:-.'!.--',..„--"'"_---:_ii.. ----7---7-=' .';',1;1.:•_''•i',- \:_.•,.. .t.....,•- -.. . V ; i-44.i-4.;:. 4-,—,- '.!-:r.---,---.,--,.-:,,___ =.==,,. ,:;.N100:7,--.41It --7141:40, ,.:.-•'1141,i,f -. :, -,,, ,:-.!,-*;,,,4„,-•i_ii .'. .. -:-..;::- - _._. _•.:FIA17,77!!.. 7?-:-...:7_..... --=_ ,_... __ _:; 1,1;1,..F!.i'i.:i1.;,1g.*.i...V1 :::.!.:.---if;i4k4-111i1,1-i- J.I.T.--..; 1 ' -'---I'''':---':'::: ---;'. - — ' '- •-•-;:::LJ,tittkil.::-vt-iLf(114_fliri14:::-:::: N .:1 -.;' ''' '-''' : ir'l ':--- - ' - ',: ''.: 53°8°6! • ,:, .:1:-'..-.. 7:-...,.Ai-ti'l,:t!'-- '1- ..;'?...f:2- klt,i.;- '' - .!:-i:itt_i)Iiii %i.:4ti'41t.:1 :.:::.:4..•-,•:',0.,ii1A;-_-'...,-t'.14 : 71,4!:[ .,:_:,:-: -- '' ilitglitrl-,!4:4irif I-14411 ._ *t):0 Tilg4,1,' -_-:-.:-.* '-_,. ,,:l'i , '',;...LiI.:::;;" !!.: c,?'';r: •- . - ' _ : , _i: . :::71,,,P.:,_,L,-7,roi.v,!-44Iwiii.,:.,YOHrici„141,1,1 :',--r•-,:;',- -:;-_',.i:::',1:', --.-4.-.;41-i_RI-r;.:',,i,:ti7:-:_:. :,,,,, ....__,- „.„..,... .,.,..4-..e,..„.,..„.5, „.„_. — „,,„.,..,, ,,,,iT,„ ,, ....„,_, k,„.„%- ...p,_z4i.,- '.4-7.':., ....,..,_ ,k, •.„,::dt:41.L.N,';.-:•- i:c.r.,:-.7::::-',.... ,..-7::- ;--.• '• :. -- -.' ' ''''I'' '''P t‘44.11-,-1-'1 • ',---41I0-I -:''•-A-4,-;-'1 1,11-44t4;--".;:'-''' ' ' - • r-:'-• ' *iirk-• -I•---1'-'Vit%liti1R-I.1;':-.'lt-'7,-!-- 3"4,17,14:kr4-4,:ai''.', .--•'-.. -- ' _ _ r,_,,•-:_',Z:z_ .. .. k----v.11,!,-.i...-wckt,,Tt-:.',--4.....,. --- -,•- 11.. -"t . 71ft;A:sP _,- ', :..„__,.:::-__,.,..__,,,A;__,,-.:.ki-„N.--ic4,.;,:;4,:,%,_,:-„,..1_,-1 . 380-4 • _ ', 4.",,_- :7-44-?A,c,..,•4',-,,i / :;i-,!...,',...;',,:-', ',•:::.0-:!!`.1t,-If-,t--Oill$74•0• ,,_ _. __ ,,.__ ' ft7,7:.! ,;',.;_,-.r,,•.:.,1 _ _-':v. : ti ' t. _ .17;i? - -'';'' '._ . _ , - __ .#1kti-7!,' .-: .-: 4 '' 4 it-tp,, - , , ' '- -- - , ;,==7.ee_,-.,,,;,-:--1.T'‘nii' l.'•: '''. ' ,,,'-v-.--7t:'• -•:,-. .,,-#41---iV. . . - -.---,--, ' w , ___ ..,,,,,,,.....2_,......,t.t.„k , ,:,..„.ti..__: _ . :y4(71' -',..-_7„:-:- • -1'.:..:Ilii.,!INNIN N f 4;'-"-...-•A :,,,-„Y,--,-;----• __- . r _ , ...., 6307000, "!1 JR,-,_,4*i. .'_L-. _ ,- - - - - - __ ' , __ _ _ , ,, ,__ _-,_,,,f_ 4,---Va n•--:•:':LI?,--7_-AA; - ".•:*/-,..- --i;:;1'. ---':-' --. - ' _ •_ -,- .1 !:- ,g'il -%,2,',.-t-7-',7 10T is trp. ,-:',•.-•,-sjr_f2; :ii.*: ,r,-. _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ . '_ , _ ,_,, if „.,-,01,_;{.-;",',•.!,-'- - mma zOPE :::-•rj.-Fii.If17- _„,:.._.„-,,,__ _..:_,,,,:_ _ . _._._.s._ ,_ ..__ .:_,:_, ,r_,:::_ , _i _. _ ,__,, ____ ,_r 4 4 r„:4:4,_4 4_ r 4:: r 4 r 4 4_ 4-'..,i.ik-oF-F-1 .... TICS: _.,;014,-- t ..:-.:7.•:-;i,......-':',r4-_r r•,-■ _ _r,.', r _,_. -, _r-rr 4 . r - ,4 :,r4-, , 4, C°NUtP MARK TO SCAL8 DATUM:"1:127 PLEASE n•unitAxA11°N8, doNn° tk STATE KAMERA:10Lp TO NAD27 PROJECTION:.-- CORRECTING T THE DATUM 4.-- ,_-___•,, _. , _ , , :_ _ r r L-: ,-'' ' MAP LOCATIONS MAP, ET FED SCALE 1:12,000 ____ ft/NIS 'S ...,.petTENT. FLAT-TOP CLEAR- 4755' U ler WITH OUTSiDE OOP" MA IA IN TIP-Fr:r OFR°AND AG um0 MAP SeWHENF you ARE USING EXTENDS 0 ABOUT 110_-OF G _AcroNW s00 POLYGON cAii°11/ NEST#1,...s'iatj W SIDE pram WurgjeS N°W' 0 POLYGON.puLTA-lu ..„,.... S OF ENDS SHOWS HABITAT P°''''''' NEST,IAA-41 PAUE8Acur. T LIVE DOIN: FEET PHS EAGLE gT N OF WHERE PAVEMENT OF DE41" Y BaNG tAjN51 BROKEN-TOPPED,FLAT , SH°''''' BALD FIR JUST pART IN TaPpRESENTI" SOLID LINE i F S15 ,C)41!(.193-NEs I Loc,A0FHou.: - OF T.- N9 SIDE T28..,,NR°e7WDPW,nn7193 N IN ,,EAGLELS„,0X. „,...81DE) AL4 ',"' 31 E-- TOP t°vv .---T71 ' '-•°411 00625 UTPA 5259 310 minnFro _ ,TALA P°111UrPIEI?:1:29 19H9.1E183_1. 8 N EAGLE NESTS -- - . 689--LAST OCCUPIED 39'1 ATffeknou' E53a Me FT FR°/A 1 2999310 52638e 1 es LA47s7;55;014144 arrpol E20S15 N — , 9_3 TAI-Acx:FOr39'40 T2814 E 7708 206 \ 4755 10610 1 2. TERRITORY JA TALA POINTup139,ED:6422Q T ,IT I t bald eagle . _ ',...ti -i 6804 lAsT/2.122 POINT OSPREY nest trees . . . r01),.. 4756' ne _---- TAIA PAHA 928 tion of the The loco RE 2. --- FIGU— Tala Point ■ ' Figure 3 16' g'14 ur____ C4tii." L.LU65 a 450`t fro 010001/N 1 ;V --4 —""*rr; e.v mil•I'.■Jy f. `--�� t LOT ai t V Tax"tar r`e114;, I is - - LOT fg '� it Sly, - 15't4 1%,,, L,l�7"ts."Lk.,, 1.... ..- I tor (f9 ' —(c.. r Ler i ,...-..... '� CAUANAtJ ue� .--_ -. w G -LA�U1lU t7Y 4..,-le"c c r;I -.._ _ m, __ -----• I ., 1 _ v° Lar a .. i ....9 svo 4. Sao . ! .$ McvaeltiarzF• NEST 3�"u tit I, = - Lc�`t ti TREE #2 ° t b ��`-__z A,z.tx .rya r - r � 3$ 2- lZ 4-" ��� . It — _ —,. �„ �r CS r�apL� __ +� La r GREENE m -` - : ,, 1 j i�t 1...., ;- : t «w , x ` �, 6AT6 F`'t`1.01.‘ Lo Q • urdr RCN 1;AY(o 60 ALL 1-�x ND AA \--- _ i .1, , M t t{!i JAN 1 2 2006 et:�- 1`` LM CiIvM 1 V �-cat�rev .1a►ter►oy us.14060 tt.0i11EN1 1 ift i�r7 -- Wt10W1 �lloLtp t Lvet4f Es 6614) IA FIGURE 3. The location of the Greene property within the Tala Point Bald Eagle Territory and the location of bald eagle Nest Tree#2. to v xi QQ o \ n ,' \ M z ti ,o .4 o o Sy0�F O r Zop � \ � y ti t) • H a c /n as 2 b : ;v av /yam ,s 33 ) a '1 v� \ `9 g,\ �Y o m-11111 1'1 � • -- •� O� \0 • • . 7! / /7 / . • N), 7_,......_ t ■1 R I v n 5 n *q s l i i o --< .......1 p k� co : -t'i�li � 1 \ L --I / Z� ��� I (-- ,,, \ ...„7,,,,,,, _ S------- _.1- / _____L4--- ----O'r,-PF"'---- /`i�////1// ° N I ` /' ''''' cn o Z ////// ~yam^\� C. a k \ I// "1 I 0 cn 1 n 2 Pyi / CI zr M I o v'1\7— AW` I II ir." I j\\ fl v aI / � — ` I i w IC 2 V1 0 ' I I e I .. i \li, •i Z p N I I e\ I I i (/) co (641"-r-1) I 2 ( O -4 O I I o r I I ,i a.\\ c\ 1 °C "1 2 IvZ \ ',� y 2\ \ \ P i R `i S es �` \ a F�Q� \ \ C 10 ' Co Co \ \... \ -1 la .. \ ® \ + / .... / c.n ..t ,., ..... ,z) w ... co 8 eaM 0 o ) \ I 13 ,,, N it 0 .1 $ " \ r�� Ca el o� q 61 1 _ — -- e =�2 t MI �o \\i■ \x � Cm \ ~I� r�� _ . So to ,.S eta 4,.. MI sz Zr -'.1 \ • / Er„ zi. - " M eD 1 U 1.! rr, p , co I ay � Z tapes Z \ � � � � / Qo CD CO C ra --'^ --'....d O i to �.__�__.._.._.. .� �. _\ 'E om Cot;:JI.a k #��mgV�N±4V!..bOVaup44 0 ''au# N.+ i0 MAXHHEIM st ., ., -----, „e-:;/„. o11:11i !0ii� i : :i:6.818 I ,1.-. 2 O i � s!iii ; i!! ;;i :! il � (= Jy-,,=\¢ v :- � 1-.L. i:o gam n�i �� 1u w i l� e a■■ ?/F�. -----,,:r..:,,S,>"---„ k °m lm a] 1.J� hey W u: -m . . G\ T z N 6R � ° ll Ii17 5.IE 3R 1!1 W '''''''C'''''''' ..\. IN 4 I j "E x i `\ \\ I--- ` ~ 1 I Di g is\ 3 \ \ }- " 1 Si oz _ N 7,- r \ w $,. e o q of ag 5� g� gN"+ / I am'�^> c\ mpg,z$oi�w I r<4�. ^r` \\ 4. 3 $ 1'9153 „`i /�''_- \\ N_/ ri°.��: $.i' d a c �x�\ �,-"eA8 ,�'; ax O (� 0 12 o .�s .5 86 a g 45 : >13 ii M! 81! !I ! 11! Ili! i n X11" / ` \ \ �8 -G € A K, / ---- / O I m L a A F g i t ,, ;>, \ y 1 a gcN fJ mk 0 'j ' / ` ', w� —\ \ 1�' p 1 W D �x ) 1 \ 1 OC = DO �m nth . i. . f/' I \ w" C 1 mom n 2 t' 1/ \, 1 4? ' �' \ �y�y �`. I ; 11 �. 1 =-- = - D P m o a / 1 4 I i I p 1'+� i j ii ep — 1-- -- f___.__ r_______-_-7___,;e,,,4' 0r ,,i°f ,?, no _/ - cool c� I/ "i 3 __ — 1 y f/. r ! i� / I• 2 '1 c) I I,!IF\ I_ D It :rj,/,f,F3_tm or,s-' ,j'} ! r. 1 /\ /_J plvl j z c Ins I - '> ' 31 ` a!<J' t .•V ,stn. 0y // > !-_:i: O `m'^� I `5 3 11 \_�.��\ '1`" t x�'F.�t r - �i 4 '— / "3 '� l j 4 ITI ti III \ J �i" �� y��s b�� 3 < rn ! 1' — c� I � I. q.;--'4:8111011k,1,1. n ,a -+� ,I 9i, ,"`w°vy✓.�d„aA `,y� �`` ` �.to I � ! -- _ , g ` I ( °�. b. *.i I i a' Wi`M�aa �0vE+' o'• '.. 4 9■ \ a i / -_ s m o o m ��/ ! __ ;,---14,:::',_ ‘'N'ZikkL :-..,*''' :Zili--'- 4,a4illtiNs''fin . Pa `\ ,_ 1 ^—/ "Z O4. 7 . - � IV� xx � o r ._ _ �—. /) / - g°$5 _ _ �IIryII, m� ~off �z��j /. $`,y�� \ --w_ m \ / '3�� m 7_ — —r VIII.,, ,,, ,_, ,,,a I _,,.._, __ ,__,. ft ��x 11,4,../.. F , ., . fir' ,�/ r _ s, 1, witkoiss, " \ ,...../..e.i., __ _ . .cn=_ SETBACK '-. � o_ �; ;' C��`/�! H - /' . -'-4.' IV,. -it `'%;r4t, /It, _ _ _s_ '',,?;v " ''''' ...„, 444,....t4,07- -..., .,4.1*//\ ' m I � .�� A W OF l __` W i7 -_ m.� -. .-... _.. lT'FF I ,Pik � — _ V. till? a -_s , x v �� w m z _ - c4 Li / _- .- ©r 172 F � : rn F —O oL g =` _ co m rn --rn o � } z ,, Z m Q'' . - ` -O w _v O} —cp M O p m h p i [ .1 4. C N 0 co o m Z§ o y rij PdN 14 ^� trj I i I o• N a ry�� i 71 v { . : x x cn �\� � m T m cc O$r 9 Z "4 .. z Z o Z v 7 J o X x y n z e N 5. r. n - t7 M M F I N N E December 22,2005 Jefferson County Department of Community Development Permit Center 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368 360 379.4450 phone /1 , 360 379.4451 fax P�«N 2 ,i 5 MAOS- 5a : Greene Residence (O , - . . -. - : . Port Ludlow WA 98365 Parcel#'s: 821151005&821151006 Ms Linda Atkins: Per your request,we have included 4 signed copies of the revised Site Plan showing both the waste and water lines in accordance with the septic design. Please let us know if you need further assistance. Regards MA, •60610 -15 �5 a_t J Scott M.Huebner FINNE Architects PACYr Jr scott@finne.com S �lnlJ v)ot- V' V)oft a`r�5 — (*CVC.12, ,1)(1.‘CA.\ cc: Gary and Betty Greene file ncg,Iva 0, FINNE ARCHITECTS 2 1 7 P I N E S T R E E T 12TH FLOOR PENTHOUSE SEATTLE, WA 98101 1520 TELEPHONE 206/467-2880 FACSIMILE ' 206/467-2882 o' .�' :> Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01, 2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15, 2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PERMITTEE AUTHORI lealA,`A OR CONTRACTOR 1 \ I r. i 7E1�' Gary Greene 2242 NW Market Street,#166 S�P ' '" ^ Seattle,WA 98107 Cp n 206-794-2794( ) JEFFEflSON CO N ' Project Name: Greene Tala Shores Septic Crossing Project Description: Septic and Water Utility Crossing of a Type NS Stream. PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006; Provided: work below the ordinary high water mark occurs between June 1st and November 15th unless the Area Habitat Biologist listed below approves working outside of these dates due the presence of a completely dry stream channel. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than 3 working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Enforcement Sergeant listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than three working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 4. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Septic System, Parcel#821151005 & 006 Stream Crossing Detail for Gary Greene and dated August 13, 2005, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. Septic and Waterline Installation Provisions: 5. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. 6. The conduit shall be installed at sufficient depth so that the conduit cannot become exposed during future streambed scouring. Page 1 of 5 • •Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 7. When using trench excavation, the trenches shall be excavated in the dry or shall be isolated from the flowing stream. Plowing, placement, and covering shall occur in a single pass of the equipment. Disturbance of the streambed as a result of the plowing operation shall be limited to the amount necessary to complete the project. 8.Trenches shall be backfilled with native material removed during the trench excavation, and the streambed shall be returned to preproject condition. 9. The conduit approach trench shall be isolated from the stream until laying of the conduit across the stream occurs. Temporary Streamflow Bypass Provisions (if necessary): 10. A temporary bypass to divert flow around the work area shall be in place prior to initiation of other work in the wetted perimeter. 11. The bypass shall be of sufficient size to pass all flows and debris for the duration of the project. 12. Prior to releasing the water flow to the project area, all conduit installation shall be completed. 13. Upon completion of the project, all material used in the temporary bypass shall be removed from the site and the site returned to preproject or improved conditions. Equipment Provisions: 14. Equipment used for this project may operate below the ordinary high water line, provided the drive mechanisms (wheels, tracks, tires, etc.) shall not enter or operate below the ordinary high water line. 15. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities along the stream. Water Quality Provisions: 16. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. 17. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. Page2of5 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01, 2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15, 2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 18. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 19. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Re-vegetation Provision: 20. Alteration or disturbance of the bank and bank vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calender days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. PROJECT LOCATIONS Location#1 Greene Residence WORK START: September 06, 2005 (WORK END: November 15, 2006 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 17.0189 Unnamed Tributary 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91749 W 122.65461 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to the provisions of the Washington State Fisheries and Wildlife Code, specifically RCW 77.55(formerly RCW 75.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local, state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to secure any landowner permissions or use authorizations as needed for the project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one Page 3 of 5 ■ Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road • FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date:September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A hundred dollars per day or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.100 or 77.55.200 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.110 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.170. CHAPTER 77.55 RCW RE-CODIFIED: Chapter 77.55 RCW was re-organized and re-codified by the 2005 Legislature in Second Substitute House Bill 1346, signed into law by Governor Gregoire as Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 became effective July 24,2005. The Code Reviser's Office is in the process of completing the re-codification and conversion of the bill into RCW. The RCW referenced at the top of this HPA has been superseded by Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Until the re- codification process has been completed,the following reflects the section(s)of Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 under which sections of former Chapter 77.55 RCW can now be found: FORMER CHAPTER 146 TITLE 77.55 RCW LAWS of 2005 RCW 77.55.010 Sec.406 RCW 77.55.100 Sec. 101,201, 301, 507, 508, 601, 605 RCW 77.55.110 Sec. 101,201 RCW 77.55.150 Sec. 101, 303,401 RCW 77.55.200 Sec. 501 RCW 77.55.210 Sec. 504 RCW 77.55.220 Sec. 101, 502 RCW 77.55.270 Sec. 101, 402 RCW 77.55.280 Sec.403 RCW 77.55.290 Sec. 505 • APPEALS INFORMATION IF YOU WISH TO-APPEAL THE ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF, OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL,THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100, 77.55.110, 77.55.140, 77.55.190, 77.55.200, and 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30-days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party, and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached,or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Environmental Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal, a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100 Page 4 of 5 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A OR 77.55.140: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties; or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. if there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal_ C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.110, 77.55.200, 77.55.230, or 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504; telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF ALL APPEAL. RIGHTS. IF THERE IS NO TIMELY REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL, THE DEPARTMENT ACTION SHALL BE FINAL AND UNAPPEALABLE. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry ( ) P3 Jeff Davis 360-895-3965 e for Director Habitat Biologist --- r a WDFW CC: Stacie Hoskins, J efferson County DCD Ted Labbe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Natural Resources Dept. Page 5 of 5 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Friday,July 14, 2006 1:16 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com; mike @cds4you.com; Boyce @fairbankconstruction.com Subject: RE: 850 Tala Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 Importance: High Michelle, I have talked with Mike Deeney about relocating the driveway, and it appears on the surface that we would have to move/redesign the septic system. It would take considerable resources just to determine if it was feasible (site visit, survey in the tree locations, etc) , and then even more resources to redesign the system. Therefore we are going to try and make the existing driveway configuration work without taking down any additional trees. However we may find that we need to take down either tree #42 and/or Tree #43 . Tree #43 is actually a nurse tree (5-6 inch cedar) growing out of a large stump. Tree #42 is actually a cluster of 3 trees: a 16" Fir; a 14" Fir; and a 12" Hemlock. If it proves necessary to remove one or more trees, do I legally have to get County permission first? If yes, could you conditionally approve the removal of these trees if necessary to provide reasonable access to the property for the construction vehicles, not to mention fire fighting equipment? So with the Driveway back to the configuration approved by the County in January 2006, is it possible to obtain approval for the other changes depicted on the June 21, 2006 revision? Or do I need to submit a new revision without the change to the driveway? Also, have you made any progress in amending the various permits to eliminate the 50' set back from the bluff? Our contractor is scheduled to start the site work the first week of August, so I need to get these loose ends tied up. Thank you for your continued help. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District (rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:03 PM To: Greene, Gary Cc: Susan Porto; Linda Atkins; mike @cds4you.com 1 !Subject: 850 Tale Shore Drive revised site plan dated June 21, 2006 Hi Gary: I spoke with Susan Porto and Linda Atkins of Environmental Health (EH) . We reviewed the revised site plan with the approved sewage disposal designed site plan that was prepared by Mike Deeney of Creative Design Solutions. According to the septic site plan, the revised driveway location will be located within the primary drainfield areas. Therefore, you'll need to contact Mike Deeney (800-395-7296 or 360-457-6353) to have him verify that the portion of the driveway to be relocated will not have an impact on the primary drainfield. Mike should also coordinate with Susan and/or Linda. I will need EH approval prior to approving the revised site plan. Should you need to contact Susan or Linda they can be reached at 360-385-9444 or emailed at the above addresses. Sorry, looked like this would be an easy one. Michelle Farfan Project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) III 2 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 June 20,2006 Mr.Jeff Davis Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road Montesano,WA 98563 Dear Mr. Davis: As we have previously discussed on the phone, I would like to amend the Hydraulic Project Approval# 102795-1 issued on September 01,2005 for a"Septic and Water utility Crossing of a Type NS Stream" on our property located at Tala Shores,WA. The approved HPA authorizes the placement of the potable water and septic in two separate trenches separated by a minimum of 10 feet. I request permission to also route the storm water tight line under the stream. I propose locating the storm water pipe in the same trench containing the potable water piping.This proposal will not result in any additional disturbance to the stream or stream bed. I would also like to obtain approval for the temporary placement of a construction bridge across the Type NS Stream. As depicted on the enclosed site plan,the temporary construction bridge would consist of a 24 inch aluminum culvert covered in gravel. The diameter of the culvert is equal to the average width of the Type NS Stream. You will note that this proposed culvert is twice the diameter of the pre-existing culverts located immediately to the North and South of my property. The temporary construction bridge would remain in place during the winter wet season. I have enclosed both a full size site plan and a 11x17"site plan. The 11"x17"is simply a"cut and paste"of the full sized plan. Please call or email me if you have any questions at 206-794-2794 or Garv.F.Greene@uscq.mil Sincerely, /1) Witt/ r Gary Greene Copy: Ms Michelle Farfan,Jefferson County • s ` GREENS RESIDENCE 8 5 0 TALI\ SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW , WA 983 4' X06 - 194- 79'1 ��w a�w acv ���ti_�4 r i` d� n__"._ __ ��. ' .�. .._..--- ......_„_-- isd;rA 4 j\t' •, ~ry dY / � ym,.d'''i a .gib. dz� rl I d • i :` I creek 1 SITE SECTION: TEMPORARY CULVERT TEMPORARY SALE: 1/4" = 1'4" CULVERT INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL 061191:?°°0 NOT TIED _ __ y _---- 12" CULVERT ----------------- ____----------------------------- CULVERT OUTLET FL EL NOT TIED _- - GRAVEL DRIVEWAY - -.�11k //' ° ' "E 360 59 ` S89 3 1 34 ', I / 1 353.56 ;/ . , c c $, i , ilp ' E STIN �9c ` 21 �-_� / \ 1 `\ 89 18 / 1 JCH MARK 4 ,�� �`y 19 4. ii , E NOTE 3 41114,,, 40, W 1 WE/ 21 I ------------ \vv � �v ztAU 4111�� 5 /' ; j \; 16 '` 1 PE IE' T" I N r ,1 , , / \ / / b' • •III E• I I \\ i�%\ `\ \��■ �� `.' iii 'y�;; ti" 111 co \ ( v \ rw n 9 1 vv ��' q i tit��llll���� �ii --� �v �IIIIIII� i 6 , ���11111l1111111 Illuslll��_ 001,,, — / 1/ 494/ i /\ 7 x %1 / // y'\\ \\\ _� ,r s l f f \ \ , \\ \8 .,, 1 fr � it 1\ \ \ — __ / / v v I v ` \ \ \ f 1 ` `� t/E G- Or i \ \ \ 1 \ \ •C',.,.\ \ ArBA' -.41:**'. 0110 1 I ' rot.k4 t ' ------ 94 4---- \ / ,N / / \ s-Z. 0+ ��O ( / v v �`��" 483 / , a i ��oikr, / \ \ 7 , ■ 7 pt� / / 1 / v\ tN / erg ��: / / I I k-41IP// / /� / / l 1 i 71,1 OF 111,N / W- .‘ \ \ co oo co 03 CO 00 N 24 1111111 1 I` 1 ,3 SITE PLAN �` CARPORT-PVC -- FRAME AND SCALE: 1/16" J ` ' IC TARP J Michelle Farfan To: Sally Ellis; Colleen Zmolek; Kathie Anne Sukert; Peter Bonyun Cc: Roseann Carroll; Cara Leckenby Subject: Gary Greene Shoreline Fee Hi all: Heads up! Gary Greene will be sending in a check in the amount of$294 for a shoreline exemption for APN 821151005/006. This will need a new shoreline case set up and attached to MLA05-0526 for a stormwater tightline to the beach. I have informed Mr. Greene of this and spoke with Cara about setting up the case Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) it 1 road Page 1 of 1 ROAD LOG INFORMATION FOR TALA SHORE DR ROAD NUMBER:C509109 ROAD NAME:TALA SHORE DR CROSSROAD NUMBER:C503609 CROSSROAD:PARADISE BAY RD CROSSROAD MILE POST:2.88 CROSSROAD LEFT OR RIGHT:L ROAD LENGTH:0.76 GRID ROAD STARTS:I-8-G MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS SEARCH ROAD SEARCH CREATION DATE SEARCH http://isserver/address/RoadDetail.asp?ROB NUMBER=C509109 11/14/2005 (00N � JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti d � 621 Sheridan Street 4. ,t0l Port Townsend, WA 98368 �IN� Al Scalf, Director October 28, 2005 GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST#166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 RE: SITE ADDRESS:850 TALA SHORE DR MLA#: MLA05-00526 CASE#. BLD05-00557 Dear GARY F GREENE: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The following items are needed before the building permits can be issued: 1. Copy of signed, approved Eagle Management Plan from WDFW. 2. An engineered drainage control plan that addresses items 4, 6 & 7 on page 4 of the Geotechnical Report and that includes a grading component. 3. Four copies of the revised site plan. (the site plans I have were dated August 26, 2005). Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by January 26, 2006. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f.,if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90) calendar day period,the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, / diIT,. 0_, 1 Department of Community II ill.ment Staff c: File Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 I- DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ' for PARCELS 821151005 & 006 • ---:'r ( 1` ,.p F w? ; ` M !0.#h W�•fw'.". g e, .,,,',::,; o A }I A1- i;ev '� a -"' ' . z .,i, 041414:2‘f+'4 :aye .. rn -zt°"c." A t 4'' - .^`gym er _. II ��� �� Prepared for:4. ., , I . _ ,....._ , GARY & BETTY .w, ....)_ - �4O AZ'GISTERE9 J.. ;L- c GRE NE I �ONAL E�� APPROVED EXPIRES 8-25-07 STORMWATER PL V . 1 A AUG262 1 JAN 3 0 2006 005 NORTHWESTERN TERRITORI S, INC. 717 S. Peabody St. PD 1.1 Ang s, WA 98362, 360-452-8491 JEFFER • OU'it Y I fEPT.OF(.; DF OPME SIGNATURE: I I;� ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0,...._...,...._ . i 1 (13 ,i °APIA 1 , A.1(4 $1117.1/M9OTZ I I az o 1:A :4 ri V t 101 VOMET1331 i Ttitiwioxi V:141 Y1I/V 014101 40 1140 L I 111 r GARY & BETTY GREENE i I HOOD CANAL i "` VICINITY MAP _ Y' 4 QUILCEN 1 \,,-4.0„:,,:..:1, 7 . .., r 4 (",,,..,. ,,,,, , -,,..- : - S plLIPs , O� 1 ,_, , - , BRINNO0 I' a. JEFFERSON COUNTY ,I '■ I MASON COUNTY o I . ,,‘,, ,, ,,_. 3P 14. 1 f r KITSAP COUN lijarp. :: • ■ . -1 � �� Il I Kl .AP COU�` Pl.RCE COUP I ,AleT NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. Engineers - Land Surveyors - Geologists ,.I_ Construction Inspection - Materials Testing I NT: 717 SOUTH PEABODY,PORT ANGELES,WASHINGTON 98362,(360)452-8491 I I I . ,- I IDrainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan for Parcel Numbers 821-151-005 &006 I * {�y �4 ANN 411 4 Il 0111/.111;'' * n w I ' r te 4 I .,, ( cal:4 ..'' 4 , 11.k-1g i.-IT'Ia'.1° ,. ,r., :it . - . . . . a 4 3 y, E- 4 ' IArea Map II I iii I I IDrainage,Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan for IParcel Numbers 821-151-005 &006 No'e€ t ` # &/1,5.007 ) I : ' i ' 4 11:. 41* 1. .11,452174.� a � '. ,� t La; 't # ter, frf . .. �T .�,..,.,„,,..„,,..... N'' ff* — ---'* ':of, j, '1' , i 4i.:4:ii,,04.„ 1 Neighborhood Map I Iiv F!e#A t :d 4 r V' I U a x / 'NF 1 411 W t R . �� `Ire \\ I �� � � 4_ IEV r-fr `1, \„, cl I;x' ••f \\ .1 + 0 41 b 11 4 , W ` X _ ,, ''''\,..\\s, ,----\1 _§ g ° U O3 �+�;�,'*� '''VAI,,t'''t.t,it;',Z.,,,AS14.&.'"I;PP%.‘''.' •N`s's.''‘\-\- .-— t t ,.....7, 1 In-' }ill 1 I Cip i it. 1,-) , :,..- _-_-_ _. .:›----- . ./g,. 1 cl � I �w �O !, �3" I ii P. I - Q \I ,� �_ ' , f o Q' a .a N /a 41. a 4. 1 \1,4 I Cg a\Q,` 6b6 : '`\\/ ,,fy qtN tiY, .."°-...s..._,,, X V I , ��w x/1 • t �y4— ,411/4:11: 4ii,,,,,,..4, ' Iti `-' \\. 4:' fli,4114.:141 'le- \ si_ilLip.-''';', - ,._,/, ,-- 1 '( i `'s',HS I 1/(I t ` P.mo w+ \�gT.7 ao : '-1 d i n / �,J P /F S +-i4 '^ � 'X _ *Z1 "•�, • �, , �•.LL t ;-,1 aD � i !/i n � (i �, Ii 4 ! ► a a ! , i ± �'s� h LU 1 1/141..47\ I i / \ \ �/ � \ V z \ .5 al ILI �i o Wow 11) w 0 OOa GF us N, � LL MgOa OWW I m�a oftwz .aF�N Ui N O X ; I - __ M 7 \- "ir 1,,,t,' ,.- I - I m Mir I '':-`:::N:::?' /P■•4 '-- - ' C t .:,.....•,........,:.,.......i. A 1Il ! I �� + t 0 ' t ‘-- 411■ c, ., . .. 2 a J -- , ill s.,41,,..1.,...t1/4:7,..\:.:‘,4N, ;...st‘",,..v..46,\..-vow,Nitija.:.=!,:!:.:y,ii_k, \,..\\:\\\N \--\'''' i to -f---Z-L.1:7,7::,:.r„lk. ,,,\,.\\\L co .— � I ca ci °? • -' A , v AII ! ∎■ r■,, \J a ,e® ?;a.�+,od„ n 'af t :7 " '.\ \i 1 1 ^d w O 1, 2 i ;A: f{p a w+' �.c% ' �e� .\ ; 1 1 8 a: ■ \ 1 yn`+,y'3 pr'rpn �'6f patia°is `�. it ,+v -� �., \` 1 X 1 d 1 l*}'F' +�sd. 0. - n13.k':r` bSR✓ <a7' 1' 1 2 Il Iri t.rk}R91jvwk4 p�3.*-ti~QSA 4,.,p n d 1� ( 'Mit17' /`_q' 1 ..,• 1 G kb•56�Yy4 p df f`r 4 v f i^1 >. I 1 CA -'8 O ce , s .`yp£s;,r p > t .. Q .�,:.: f 1 N a b ca W ~ W 1 e C2, 1 % 1 ",f' • �� 4 —�,a V 1 I 1 2 1 _r ,.....„_/,./ ar,�/ i 1 0 i i M l 7 .N N --'''' ''OL • '. / 1 4 1 It)"41'4-- 1 . ., /-----. . % ,,,,,,--, ,.,..--2' 1 1 Ink s \c /-.,,,_ I ; . N / / \ \/\\ o � ; � � Z , 1 _ _ { LL mo Z . r , ,�,, _ tr \ � V / / IA L.....1 . t- 1 I- = J CO v cn I \ _/ I h 1 I o vii 1 Drainage,Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan ' for Parcel Numbers 821-151-005 &006 I ABSTRACT This project consists of the construction of a single family residence and appurtenant ' structures on two platted lots. This plan was prepared to comply with the requirements of the 2001 Stormwater ' Management Manual For The Puget Sound Basin, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE Manual), as required by Jefferson County. It contains the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in its entirety. As required by the conditions of approval of a variance, this plan provides for conveying stormwater ' runoff directly to marine receiving waters. This plan provides additional information and guidance as necessary to comply with ' the DOE Manual and to provide a reasonable level of protection against degradation of the quality of receiving waters during the construction of and as a result of the eventual full development of this project. Construction phase erosion control measures are also recommended. ' viii 1 _ I IDrainage,Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan for IParcel Numbers 821-151-005 &006 I CONTENTS I I. SCOPE 1 II. PROJECT DATA 2 IA. Project Description 2 B. Existing Site Conditions 2 1. Topography 2 I 2. Vegetation 3 3. Drainage 4 C. Adjacent Areas 5 IIII. DESIGN CRITERIA 5 I A. Soils 5 B. Rainfall 6 C. Hydrologic Model 8 I D. Time of Concentration 8 1. Predevelopment Condition 8 2. Predevelopment Time of Concentration 10 3. Post-development Condition 10 I4. Post-development Time of Concentration 12 N. RUNOFF 12 A. Data and Calculations 12 B. Mitigation 12 IV. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 13 Site Specific Construction Phase BMPs 13 IA. B. Stabilization and Sediment Trapping (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 1) 14 I ix I I _ 1 i ' 1. Stabilization of Exposed Soils 14 2. Sediment Trapping 16 C. Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 2) 19 D. Protection of Adjacent Properties (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 3) 19 E. Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Trapping Measures (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 4) 19 1. Timing of Installation of BMPs 19 I 2. Stabilization of slopes of structural BMPs 20 F. Cut and Fill Slopes (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 5) 20 I G. Controlling Off-Site Erosion (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 6) 20 H. Stabilization of Temporary Channels and Outlets (Erosion I and Sediment Control Requirement Number 7) 21 I. Underground Utility Construction (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 9) 21 I J. Construction Access Routes (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 10) 21 K. Removal of Temporary BMPs (Erosion and Sediment I Control Requirement Number 11) 22 L. Dewatering Construction Sites (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 12) 22 M. Control of Pollutants Other than Sediment (Erosion and ISediment Control Requirement Number 13) 23 1. Control of Toxic Substances 23 2. Petroleum Spills 24 I N. Maintenance (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 14) 24 O. Financial Liability 25 I I I I I x I_ It Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan for I Parcel Numbers 821-151-005 &006 III. SCOPE IThis plan was prepared to provide a reasonable level of protection, as required by Jefferson County ordinance, against damage being caused to properties within or I without the project as at result of increased stormwater runoff resulting from the eventual full development of the project. This project consists of the construction of a single family residence and appurtenant Istructures on two platted lots. A site map is included at the beginning of this report. y�" �. �� 4i:• , '"gyp,.',7*.:*:4 ' 3 YJ4' A- p ;3�.1 Y t '4:,4**; 1r `a'�k1. a `ti f ♦ " ^eat'�i. 4 .,' r �` k .�" I I /s : " Photo 1 IPhoto 1 shows a view on the interior of the parcel. The site is heavily vegetated, making it difficult to provide clear views in photos. IThis plan calculates the rate of stormwater runoff from the site in its pre- development state and post-development states and recommends the construction of I I. '- a tightline conveyance system to marine receiving waters. The plan also addresses I both short- and long-term water quality impacts of the project and recommends ap- propriate mitigative measures. II. PROJECT DATA IThis project consists of the construction of a single family residence and appurtenant structures on two parcels with a combined area of 1.3 acres. IA. Project Description The locations of the proposed improvements are shown on the site map included I at the beginning of this report. Sizes of the various land covers are listed in the catalog of site improvements included with the calculations in the appendices. I B. Existing Site Conditions The following summary of site conditions represents presently existing condi- tions. Runoff calculations are based on the less developed, pre-contact, forested Icondition. '11 bg ^' 4v ! ° +4;44. ' ' ' F 4 , ' 4 I y . Irr Photo 2 I ' Photo 2, taken at the northeast corner of the parcel, probably represents the pre- contact condition of the site. I1. Topography The parcel slopes gently from Tala Shore Drive on the west to the top of the I bluff overlooking Hood Canal on the east. Photo 3 shows an aerial view of the parcel. The Greene home site is located on the right side of the photo. I 2 1_ I ' ...4 1 I Photo 3 IA small drainage swale and an intermittent (Class 5) stream, both shown on the site map at the beginning of this report, provide some variation in the I slope. The land between Tala Shore Drive and the drainage swale is rough but has an overall slope to the east. Idea I : �,- rraia,Point .✓ iI'h. I �`�Light + i ( (j ° 1i I f�/` '''''s5 Y • /l-' ti \ f t(qji ' IFigure 1 Figure 1 shows the site in red on a segment of a USGS Topo map. - 2. Vegetation IThe parcel is heavily vegetated with older second growth timber and dense brush. Ground cover is dense. I 1 3 i_ 0,1j;w y 4 MM t 44C14.4 . N I r era -±lwr Photo 4 ' Photo 4 shows typical ground cover plants found on the site. Ground cover is more dense in well-lighted areas and somewhat less dense back under the trees in the interior of the parcel. ' The vegetation throughout the site is typically somewhat drought resistant, indicative of low rainfall and/or shallow soils. i 3. Drainage ' Runoff from lands to the west have historically been routed around the parcel by roadside ditching on the west side of Tala Shore Drive with some flows crossing under the road via culvert and flowing across the Greene parcel. ' This culvert was removed recently and flows can cross the road during peri- ods of heavy rainfall. The culvert will be replaced as part of this drainage plan. Runoff from parcels to the north and south have and will continue to flow more or less parallel to the property boundaries with little if any net flows from one parcel to another. An exception is an intermittent (Class 5) stream I - " which crosses the Greene parcel from north to south. A complete map of pre-development flow patterns is included at the begin- '- ning of this report. r r 4 r 1_ ' C. Adjacent Areas I The site is surrounded by rural residential lands with larger parcel sizes on all sides. The Area Map and Neighborhood Map included at the beginning of the re- port show surrounding lands. IIII. DESIGN CRITERIA IThe following criteria are specific to this project and will not apply to other proper- ties, even those that may be nearby. IA. Soils The site may be found on map number 55 of the Soil Survey of Jefferson County I Area, published by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service. A portion of Map 55 is reproduced here as Figure 2, with the approximate location of the Greene prop- erty marked in yellow. ,.. 4, ,-„!...,-,,:*:,*.17:- I :/nCl / 1 efc 3. , i i `4 CfE S..) /Co GfC I�N? // Ksi3�: 15 4. CkD I a CfE N --'• WhC I f, . Cfj C - - Figure 2 Map number 55 indicates that soils on the lower (eastern) portion of the parcel are Cassolary-Kitsap Complex (CkD). The Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area describes these soils as having been formed in reworked glacial, lacustrine or I marine sediments. Further descriptions classify this soil as predominantly a silty sand with some gravel. A clay seam may be found beginning between 23" and 38" in depth. CkD is a hydrologic group 'C' soil. I 5 I I . 1- I Map number 55 indicates that soils on the upper (western) portion of the parcel are Cassolary soils (CfC), which are hydrologically similar to the Cassolary- Kitsap Complex soils. CfC is also a hydrologic group 'C' soil. IB. Rainfall I The total amount of precipitation falling over a 24 hour period during a storm having a mean recurrence interval of 2 years, will be 1.5 inches. This informa- tion was taken from a 2 year, 24 hour Isopluvial Map published by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is reproduced here as Figure 3. The Iproject location is marked on the map. • GREENE I I r '1' ,,'t' 6W 5W 4W 3W 26 I Figure 3 I The isopluvial lines represent total precipitation in 24 hours, in tenths of inches. 2 year rainfall data is used to size detention facilities and in the calculation of times of concentration for the site. IThe total amount of precipitation falling over a 24 hour period during a storm having a mean recurrence interval of 10 years, will be 2.3 inches. This informa- 1 tion was taken from a 25 year, 24 hour Isopluvial Map published by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is reproduced here as Figure 4. The project location is marked on the map. l _ I - I I 6 I 1. I. T" 4 1 + , _ - , , ,_ ■ + r I -_ GREENE I � � I IFigure 4 The total amount of precipitation falling over a 24 hour period during a storm I ' having a mean recurrence interval of 100 years, will be 3.2 inches. This informa- tion was taken from a 25 year, 24 hour Isopluvial Map published by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is reproduced here as Figure 5. The Iproject location is marked on the map. 1 ,I 4 _ _ _, _, , . IGREENE• i II Figure 5 1 The rainfall distribution is assumed to be a Type IA distribution per standard practice in the area. I I 7 I. C. Hydrologic Model This plan uses a hydrograph based method of calculating runoff which is de- scribed in Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55, and ' the Western Washington Supplement to Technical Release No. 55, both pub- lished by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service. This method follows the Adjusted Target Peak Flow Standards of the Interim Guidelines of the 2001 Stormwater ' Management Manual For The Puget Sound Basin, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE Manual) and estimates both the pre- development and post-development offsite runoff from the project site, based on standard 2 year, 10 year, and 100 year, 24 hour design storms. This plan uses the suggested runoff curve numbers given in Table 2-2a of Tech- nical Release No. 55. D. Time of Concentration ' The length of time that it takes a drop of rainfall to travel from the uppermost point of a basin to the point of discharge from the basin, or to the point where flows are to be calculated,is referred to as the time of concentration (Tc). This is the sum of the time it takes for runoff to flow across the various types of flow channels as it crosses the basin. ' The following calculations are per Section III-1.4.2, pages III-1-13 through III-1- 16, of the Washington State Department of Ecology's STORMWATER MAN- AGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN. THE TECHNICAL MANUAL,(DOE). 1. Predevelopment Condition The time of concentration is first determined for the existing condition of the basin. a. Unconcentrated Flow Immediately after falling to the ground, rainwater initially travels as un- concentrated sheet flow for a period of time(Tt)calculated by: 0.80 0.42 (NsL) ' Tt= = 7.39 min 0.527 0.4 (P2) (SO) 8 I. I. Where: Ns = 0.400 = Sheet flow Manning's n(DOE Table III-1.4) IP2 = 1.5 = 2 yr, 24 hr rainfall(in) SO = 0.0650 = Slope of flow path(ft/ft) L= 30 = Length(L)of flow path(ft) I I This is flow from the perimeter of the property until it reaches the shal- low flow paths created by the previously existing culvert across Tala Shore Drive. Photo 5 shows typical ground cover at the west end of the Iparcel. I * '0.44,,. i4 ---c :7: It : ? �� ^a I Photo 5 Ib. Shallow Concentrated Flow As sheet flows run together and become concentrated, they travel as shallow concentrated flow for a period of time(Tt)calculated by: ' L Tt_ =0.41 min 60 Ks SQRT(S0) I 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I Where: Ks = 5 =Velocity factor(Ks)(per DOE Table III-1.4) SO = 0.650 = Slope of flow path(ft/ft) L = 100 =Length(L)of flow path(ft) ' This is flow in an easterly direction across the remainder of the western portion of the site in concentrated flow through similar ground cover. ' c. Open Channel(Intermittent)Flow ' As shallow concentrated flows from several sources run together, they cut open channels that flow as intermittent streams. Flows travel through these intermittent open channels for a period of time(Tt)calculated by: L Tt= =0.63 min 60 Kc SQRT(S0) Where: Kc = 10 =Velocity factor(Kc) (per DOE Table III-1.4) SO = 0.0400 = Slope of flow path (ft/ft) L = 75 =Length(L) of flow path(ft) I 2. Predevelopment Time of Concentration As noted above, the time of concentration (Tc) is the sum of the time it takes ' for runoff to flow across the various types of flow channels as it crosses the basin. For the predevelopment condition: ' Tc =the sum of the various Tt's = 9.32 min This is rounded to 9 minutes for use in further calculations. 3. Post-development Condition The time of concentration is next determined for the proposed, post-developed condition of the basin. a. Unconcentrated Flow Immediately after falling to the ground, rainwater initially travels as un- concentrated sheet flow for a period of time(Tt)calculated by: 10 '_ 0.80 Tt' _0.42 (NsL) = 7.39 min 0.527 0.4 ' (P2) (SO) Where: Ns = 0.400 = Sheet flow Manning's n(per DOE Tbl III-1.4) Ps = 1.5 = 2 yr, 24 hr rainfall(in) SO =0.0650= Slope of flow path(ft/ft) L = 30 = Length(L)of flow path(ft) ' This sheet flow is unchanged from the pre-developed condition. b. Shallow Concentrated Flow As sheet flows run together and become concentrated, they travel as shallow concentrated flow for a period of time (Tt)calculated by: L ' Tt= = 1.23 min 60 Ks SQRT(SO) ' Where: Ks = 8 =Velocity factor(Ks) (per DOE Table III-1.4) SO = 0.0650 = Slope of flow path(ft/ft) L= 150 =Length(L)of flow path(ft) 1 ' c. Open Channel(Intermittent)Flow As shallow concentrated flows from several sources run together, they cut ' open channels that flow as intermittent streams. Flows travel through these intermittent open channels for a period of time(Tt)calculated by: Tt= =0.17 min I- ' 60 Kc SQRT(S0) Where: Kc = 20 =Velocity factor(Kc)(per DOE Table III-1.4) SO = 0.0300 =Slope of flow path(ft/ft) L= 35 = Length(L)of flow path(ft) ' 11 I 4. Post-development Time of Concentration ' As noted above, the time of concentration (Tc) is the sum of the time it takes for runoff to flow across the various types of flow channels as it crosses the basin. For the post-development condition: ' Tc=the sum of the various Tt's = 8.78 min This is rounded to 9 min for use in further calculations. ' IV. RUNOFF As noted above, pre-development runoff is calculated based on assumed pre-contact ' conditions and not necessarily as the site presently exists. Post-development runoff is calculated based on the proposed conditions noted above and shown on the calcu- lations included in the appendices. A. Data and Calculations Appendix I contains runoff calculations for the greater basin, including offsite lands. These calculations are used to determine the runoff from the basin in the ' undeveloped and developed condition. Subsections of Appendix I are as follows: 1. Summary of various coefficients and operational values for the basin. ' 2. Catalog of pre-and post-development land uses. ' 3. Raw rainfall data for the design storms falling on the basin. 4. Pre-development runoff calculations for the design storms. ' 5. Post-development runoff calculations for the design storms. This data is used to determine the stormwater runoff impacts of the proposed Bevel- ' opment. IB. Mitigation To mitigate the effects of the construction of this project, it is recommended that ' runoff from the site be routed to a tightline conveyance system, constructed per the construction plans included in the pocket at the back of this report. ' The detail drawings included at the beginning of this report show information necessary to ensure that the systems function as designed. Only elevations nec- 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. essary for proper functioning of the detention systems are shown on the detail drawings. V. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ' This portion of the plan was prepared with the goal of preventing to adjoin- ing dama a g djoin- ing or downstream properties due to erosion and sediment deposition and preventing ' the degradation of the quality of the receiving waters during the construction phase of this project. ' To ensure that the provisions of this Erosion and Sediment Control Plan are fol- lowed during construction, the complete text of this Erosion and Sediment Control Plan should be included in the construction plans for this project. Where formal con- ' struction plans will not be prepared for all or portions of the work, a copy of this document should be made available to the contractor and appropriate subcontrac- tors. Subcontractors that will not be receiving copies should be made aware of the plan's existence and advised where copies can be obtained. ' Water quality controls, commonly referred to as BMPs, are necessary to prevent three distinct types of impacts.g The firstrconsists of ' damage done as the result of soils being taken up by running water. This type of damage typically consists of rilling, rutting and loss of topsoil. The next type of damage is the degradation of water quality that occurs as the water transports the smaller soil particles. The last type of damage occurs when the running water re- duces its velocity and drops the suspended soils. ' The Erosion and Sediment Control features (BMPs) of this plan were designed to address all three types of damage with the emphasis on preventing the initial soil uptake. Successful prevention of soil uptake will also prevent damage caused by ' degradation of water quality and by soil deposition. While the measures described below for preventing soil uptake should theoretically prevent any removal of soil, common sense advises that additional measures will be necessary and indeed, the DOE Manual requires additional measures. These additional measures will allow deposition of transported soils under controlled conditions before flows leave the project site or enter the receiving waters. The specific types of BMPs and their locations are described immediately below. Specific details of the BMPs are described elsewhere below. A. Site Specific Construction Phase BMPs The following BMPs shall be implemented in addition to any that may later be necessary due to changing or unforeseen site conditions: 13 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. 1. Install straw bale check dams and silt fencing per the Erosion Control ' Map at the beginning of this report. Remove the dams, silt fencing, and any entrapped silts after the exposed soils on the site are covered with vegetation and/or gravels. ' 2. Construct stormwater conveyance facilities per the plans at the end of this report. ' 3. Other appropriate BMPs such as limitations on access routes, minimi- zation of soil disturbing activities, etc. as described below shall be im- plemented if necessary to accomplish the objectives of this plan. It is expected that minor adjustments, especially the installation of additional BMPs where an unexpected need arises, may be necessary during the construc- t tion phase of this project. For this reason, discussions of various BMPs that are not specifically required are included below. These BMPs should be considered as being held in ready reserve against the possibility that they will be needed. The following subsections discuss the various BMPs that may be incorporated this plan. Reasons for their use, limitations and benefits associated with specific BMPs,' BMPs, and additional information are provided. B. Stabilization and Sediment Trapping (Erosion and Sediment Control ' Requirement Number 1) These requirements are to be considered general in nature and provide a frame- work for deciding when and where various BMPs should be utilized. They are in- tended to provide guidance in quickly selecting BMPs for use in unexpected situations. They apply to both soils that are not yet at final grade and to those that are at final grade, including soil stockpiles. ' 1. Stabilization of Exposed Soils The stabilization of exposed soils is the single most important element of this ' plan. If exposed soils are protected such that soil particles are not picked up by running water, erosion will not occur. Protection of exposed soil consists of four main areas of effort. ' a. Minimize Disturbance of Vegetation Existing vegetation on the site comprises the best overall protection _ against erosion. To protect this resource and to keep the risk of erosion at I a minimum, clearing and grading activities outside of the areas necessary to construct the improvements shall be kept to an absolute minimum. Patches of existing vegetation that are within the clearing/grading limits, but may be left intact without hindering the project, shall be left alone whenever possible. ' Care shall be taken that existing vegetation is left intact wherever possi- ble around the perimeter of the project and particularly along the lower side of the project. Vegetation in drainage corridors and immediately be- 14 I 1 1 1 1 1 I low soil disturbing activities is the most valuable and as such is to be pro- vided with the most protection. b. Minimize the Length of Time the Soil is Unprotected Where grading is necessary for construction activities, the grading should be delayed as long as reasonably possible to minimize the length of time ' that the soil is exposed to the elements. Where exposure of bare soil is necessary to accomplish certain portions of ' the work, such portions of the work should be completed promptly in or- der to reduce the chance of an erosive rainfall event catching the soil un- protected. c. Ensure Prompt p Revegetation of Disturbed Areas I Every effort shall be made to ensure a healthy stand of protective vegeta- tion is established as soon as possible. Reseeding of areas which are to be planted with grass shall be accomplished within 14 days if grading opera- ' tions are completed within a planting season. If grading operations are completed outside of a planting season, reseeding shall occur within 7 days following the beginning of the next planting season. If substantial portions of the project are ready for reseeding at the beginning of or dur- ' ing a planting season, such portions may be promptly reseeded without waiting for completion of work on other portions of the project. ' Planting seasons are considered to be between March 1 and May 15 and between August 15 and October 1 where irrigation is impractical. Where irrigation is practical, the planting season is considered to be between ' March 1 and October 1. The following seed mix has been tested and found to be adequate for use ' for erosion control and for slope stabilization in Western Washington: Seed Type Percent by Weight ' Chewing Fescue 40 Colonial Bentgrass, Var.Astoria 10 I- Perennial Rye 40 White Clover 10 ' 100 Other mixes, selected with regard for the soils, uses of the site, method of ' application, and expected weather may be used if desired. The recommen- dations of the seed supplier should be sought and strongly considered in selecting a mix. ' 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' If the season or construction scheduling will not allow prompt revegeta- tion of an area where construction activities have been completed, the area should be covered with plastic sheeting, straw, mulch or other cov- ering chosen to match the situation and with due regard for the length of time that the area is expected to remain uncovered. ' d. Protective Coverings Protective coverings are highly recommended for application to exposed soils that are not being actively worked for an extended period of time. ' An extended period of time is considered to be 14 days between October 1 and April 30 or 45 days between May 1 and September 30. Protective coverings include plastic sheeting, straw, mulch, commercial sod and other coverings. The particular type of protective covering used should be chosen based on the steepness of the slope of the area to be cov- ered, the size or the area to be covered, the time of year, the length of time the covering will remain, proximity to wetlands or other sensitive areas, the amount of existing vegetation between the exposed soil and the down- hill project boundary, cost, and the visual impact of the covering. 1 The best covering is existing vegetation,g ve on g which should be disturbed as lit- tle as possible. Commercial sod is the next best covering but its use is of- ten precluded by cost. Clear plastic sheeting is suitable for steep slopes but is difficult to apply and maintain in moderate to high winds. Black plastic sheeting is not appropriate during growing seasons except for ' short periods of time. Loose straw, either straight from bales or shredded, makes an adequate ground covering on gentle to moderately steep slopes (no steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical) if it is wet to the point of limp- ' ness. Straw is generally effective where the distance from the top to the toe of the slope is no more than 100 feet. ' Early application of gravel bases, pavements, and special landscaping items such as washed rock over plastic sheeting is considered to be a suit- able protective covering where otherwise required. 2. Sediment Trapping Stormwater runoff from areas of exposed soil shall not be permitted to leave I the project site without first having passed through an appropriate sediment trapping system or device. The type of sediment trap should be chosen based - on the potential for erosion from exposed soils, the expected velocity and ' depth of flows, the proximity to downstream sensitive areas, and the length of time that the upstream soils will remain exposed to the elements. 1 16 I 1 1 1 111. a. Sheet Flow Through Grassy or Heavily Vegetated Areas ' Runoff from exposed slopes that are less than 150 feet from top to bottom (measured along the slope) can be adequately treated by routing flows through bands of dense grass of other heavy vegetation. The vegetated ' band should be a minimum of one fifth as wide as the width of the ex- posed slope, but no narrower than 10 feet. For example, a band of ex- posed soil 75 feet wide should have a minimum of 15 feet of dense grass ' for sediment trapping. The vegetated band width above is for a slope no steeper than 10 percent. ' Where the slope of the vegetated area is between 10 and 20 percent, add 50 percent to the minimum width. Where the slope is greater than 20 percent, the minimum width should be doubled. For this type of sediment trapping system to be effective, flows must cross the vegetated area in sheet flows. If flows are expected to arrive at the vegetated band in concentrated flows, creation of a small artificial delta may be necessary to force a sheet flow. b. Grassy Swales Grassy swales can be used to treat runoff from larger areas than can sheet flows across bands of vegetation. While grassy swales are typically thought of as permanent features, they can often be utilized during the ' construction phase. Typically there is no time before the main construc- tion effort to reshape landforms to provide the necessary slopes, widths, etc., and then wait while the swale revegetates. Either an area must be ' found that is already vegetated and that meets the minimum require- ments for a grassy swale or commercial sod must be placed along the sides and bottoms of the swale immediately after the swale is constructed. The following standard requirements for grassy swales were taken from the Draft Stormwater Guidelines published by the Washington State De- ' partment of Fisheries in 1990 and are recommended for use here due to their simplicity. More specific design criteria are more appropriate for use on large or complex sites. Soils Gravelly and coarse sandy soils should be avoided in order to maxi- mize water contact with vegetation and the soil surface. ii. Design Criteria - - The grassy swale should be designed based on a two-year, 24-hour peak flow and the following: (A) Velocity Velocities should be less than 1.50 feet per second. ' 17 1_ (B) Depth of Flow IThe flow depth should be less than 4 inches. (C) Slope IThe longitudinal slope should average two to four percent. Rock or log check dams or terraces should be installed as necessary to I achieve slopes of less than four percent. iii. Dimensions I Grassy swales should be located to obtain maximum length. If less than 200 feet long, the width should be increased by an amount pro- portional to the reduction below 200 feet in order to obtain the same area of vegetation contact. Iiv. Side Slopes ISide slopes should be no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical. c. Interceptor Swales I Interceptor swales are shallow trenches constructed with a single pass of a large dozer equipped with one to three ripper teeth. The preferred con- figuration of ripper teeth for construction of interceptor swales is two I teeth positioned on the outside of the ripper assembly. This type of swale construction will tear through existing sod without removing it. Leaving the sod in place will protect against erosion of the swale bottom on steeper slopes. ISwales thus constructed are intended to intercept sheet flows and infil- trate them into the soil. When flows are greater than can be infiltrated, I the swales will provide a path for runoff of excess flows. Such excess flows will run along the swale until they are either infiltrated or they en- ter interceptor ditches. IInterceptor swales are especially effective adjacent to property lines which run more or less straight up and down a slope and where only sheet I flows are to be intercepted. In order to be effective, the surface of the ground must not be regraded during the life of the swale. Grading or blading of the surface of these swales will defeat their purpose. I- Construction of interceptor swales causes only minimal disruption of the ground contours. For this reason the swales need not be removed or oth- erwise treated at the end of their usefulness. ' d. Other Sediment Trapping Devices and Systems Many other effective sediment trapping systems and devices are listed in I Table II-2.1 of the 1992 DOE Manual. Complete details and descriptions I18 ,- '+ of them are included elsewhere in the DOE Manual. They should be used ' where appropriate and as described in the Manual. C. Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits (Erosion and Sediment Control ' Requirement Number 2) Appropriate clearing limits, property lines, easement lines, and similar bounda- ries shall be determined prior to starting construction. Clearing, grubbing, ' grading and similar operations shall not begin until the appropriate limits are staked in the field. Once these stakes are set, care shall be taken that the stakes are not disturbed. ' D. Protection of Adjacent Properties (Erosion and Sediment Control Re- quirement Number 3) ' As required by the DOE Manual, no flows from exposed or disturbed soils are to leave the project site without first having been treated with some type of sedi- ment trapping/filtering system or device. The proposed arrangement of these ' devices and systems is described above. The individual items are discussed in more detail in the section on Sediment Trapping above. The protective measures shown on the site plan are designed to prevent sedi- ment deposition on adjacent properties. To the extent that the various items are constructed as designed and other work on the site progresses as envisioned, sediment should not be deposited on neighboring properties. Last minute changes in other items of work on this project, responses previ- ously unknown site conditions, or unexpected p require that a sion xpected weather may require that revisions ' to the sediment trapping provisions of this plan be made rapidly. To this end, the previous section on Sediment Trapping contains design criteria, comments, information about BMPs, and similar information that is intended to be used in ' rapidly responding to changing needs and changing site conditions. As soon as a previously unexpected threat to adjacent properties becomes apparent, sufficient measures shall be taken to either eliminate the source of the threat or to provide an adequate level of defense against the threat. The measures taken shall pro- vide a level of defense against sediment deposition on adjacent properties at least as secure as those provided by the remainder of this plan. E. Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Trapping Measures (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 4) It is essential that the various sediment trapping systems and devices be con- I- structed prior to exposing the upslope soils to the elements. Both the timing of construction of the measures and the stabilization of the slopes of the structural BMPs are mandatory parts of this plan. ' 1. Timing of Installation of BMPs In keeping with the goal of providing positive sediment trapping or removal for all runoff from exposed soils before the runoff leaves the project site, no soil shall be exposed, or grading operations performed, until all of the m- il 19 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 quired BMPs in the drainage path below the area to be exposed have been ' completed. Clearing, grubbing, and grading operations necessary for the con- struction of the BMPs are excepted from this requirement. ' 2. Stabilization of slopes of structural BMPs It is critical that the slopes of ditches, berms, ponds, and similar structural items be stabilized. These slopes will not only shed as much silt as any other ' exposed slope, but their erosion could cause the failure of the structural BMP. This could easily result in the failure of the BMP to perform its task of forcing sediment deposition to occur in a controlled location. This would leave open ' the potential for erosive transport of soil from a much larger area than that originally exposed on the slope of the BMP. F. Cut and Fill Slopes (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 5) Newly created slopes shall be covered or otherwise protected as provided for ' elsewhere in this plan. The faces of newly created fill slopes shall be well compacted. Since it is often impossible for typical compaction equipment to adequately compact the outer one to three feet of a fill, it will be necessary for compaction equipment to be operated up and down the face of the slope after the fill is completed. Operating tracked equipment in this manner will provide a certain amount of slope roughness ' which is desirable in slowing the velocity of running water and in retaining seed and fertilizer. ' After cut or fill slopes are covered, they should be monitored to ensure that the covering is functioning as intended and that rills are not forming under or through the covering. ' G. Controlling Off-Site Erosion (Erosion and Sediment Control Require- ment Number 6) ' The BMPs specified by this plan are intended to prevent damage to downstream and/or adjoining properties. To the extent that construction of this project is per- formed as intended and all elements of this plan are implemented, there should be no ofd site erosion. It is possible that extensive covering of slopes and similar practices could increase the volume of peak floods, especially if a storm event greater than a two year event were to occur before the site were completely revegetated and the stormwater infiltration/detention systems completed. The possibility of this occurring increases significantly if construction is delayed and exposed slopes must be covered through a winter rainy season instead of ' having been successfully revegetated. While this is not expected to occur, it is possible that the vagaries of the construction trade will cause this to happen. If this does occur, downstream drainage channels shall be inspected before the end ' of the Fall planting season and an inventory made of areas where increased flows would reasonably be expected to cause erosion. Such areas shall then be protected in a manner consistent with the goals and guidelines included within ' 20 this plan. Those BMPs noted above as being held in "ready reserve"on this proj- ect may be brought up to active status by their use in such ofd site situations. H. Stabilization of Temporary Channels and Outlets (Erosion and Sediment ' Control Requirement Number 7) Channels, slopes, embankments, trenches, and similar areas of disturbed soil which are required for the implementation of this erosion control plan shall be ' subject to the same erosion control requirements as other portions of the project. In addition to the general protective requirements, specific armoring methods are included in the appropriate details. Underground Utility Construction (Erosion and Sediment Control Re- quirement Number 9) ' Underground utility construction shall proceed subject to the following criteria: A major source of potentially contaminated flows is from pumping or other- ' wise dewatering trenches. For this reason, flows discharged from pumping or other method of trench dewatering shall be closely monitored and, except where there is no visible turbidity, treated as described below in the Section titled"Dewatering Construction Sites." Where feasible, no more than 500 feet of trench shall be opened at one time. ' Where consistent with safety and space considerations, stockpiles of exca- vated soils shall be placed on the uphill side of the trench. Any such stock- piles shall be protected from erosion as provided for in this plan. Trenches shall be backfilled and revegetated as soon as reasonably possible following placement of utilities. Wherever trenches run more or less straight ' up and down a slope, either the backfill shall be mounded over the trench or waterbars or similar BMPs shall be utilized as necessary to prevent the back- filled trench from becoming a water course. Simply covering the exposed soil ' may not prevent the trench from conveying waters. Where the upstream end of a pipe is subject to inundation, it shall be tempo- rarily capped or plugged at the end of each day's work to prevent soil from being washed into the pipe. The underground utility locate service, 1-800-424-5555, shall be called a minimum of 48 hours (2 working days) prior to beginning any excavation and arrangements made to have all buried utilities marked. J. Construction Access Routes (Erosion and Sediment Control Require- , ment Number 10) It is expected that minor amounts of soil will be tracked onto paved roads, espe- cially when unexpected circumstances such as rains and delays occur. To pre- vent this from becoming a nuisance or source of sedimentation, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day if there is evidence of any significant ' 21 accumulation of soil. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or ' sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area. Washing of the street shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. Wher- ever construction, delivery, and similar vehicles enter paved roads from this project, the following provisions shall be followed to minimize the transport of soil onto the paved road. ' During periods of dry weather (where the soil is too dry to adhere to the tires of construction vehicles) construction vehicles may access paved streets directly from the project site with monitoring and occasional sweeping of the paved street as necessary to prevent accumulations of soil. ' During periods of wet weather(where soil readily adheres y to the tires of vehicles) the vehicles may access graveled roads directly from the project site as neces- sary, but shall not access paved roads without first having been routed over ar- . eas where existing grass or other vegetation remains or routed down a minimum of 150 feet of graveled road. Access routes over grass or other vegetation shall be ' changed occasionally to ensure that wheel ruts are not allowed to develop and that the vegetation is not unduly worn down. ' K. Removal of Temporary BMPs (Erosion and Sediment Control Require- ment Number 11) ' Temporary Erosion Control Facilities shall be promptly (within 60 days) re- moved, once their presence is no longer required. During their removal, any en- trapped sediment shall be disposed of in suitable locations on the project site ' where they will not be subject to erosion. Disturbed areas left after the removal of sediments shall be promptly stabilized. ' As an alternate to the removal of entrapped sediments, they may be stabilized in place by the application of suitable BMPs such as sodding, mulching, seeding, etc. ' In no case shall sediments be left in a channel or where they would be washed into receiving waters by the next storm. The role of the Erosion Control Facili- ties is to prevent sediments from entering waters, not to merely delay it until af- ter construction is completed. L. Dewatering Construction Sites (Erosion and Sediment Control Require- ment Number 12) Discharges from pumps used in dewatering trenches es or other portions of a con- struction site shall be dispersed by one of the following methods: Directing flows onto existing heavily vegetated areas. If this is done, the flows shall be directed against objects such as old tires or stumps, capable of disrupting concentrated flows. ' 22 I. Directing flows onto a pad constructed of clean, pit run gravel or washed ' drain rock or pea gravel. The pad shall be a minimum of 15 feet square and flows shall be directed into a circle of 6 - 8 inch diameter stones to assist in dispersing flows into sheet flows. ' Directing flows directly into a grassy swale or other sediment trapping BMP, constructed per this plan. In no case shall flows discharged from a pump be allowed to remain as a concen- trated flow. Every effort shall be made to break the flows into sheet flows. ' In all cases, flows from dewatering shall be routed through a sediment trapping BMP before being released off of the site. ' M. Control of Pollutants Other than Sediment (Erosion and Sediment Con- trol Requirement Number 13) All potential pollutants other than sediments that may occur on the site during ' the construction process shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. 1. Control of Toxic Substances No toxic or noxious substances shall be used, stored or disposed of on or off ' the project site in conjunction with the project except in full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and the recom- mendations of the supplier of the substance. The product label or instruc- tions for use and the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for such products shall be kept on the site until the product has been used up or removed from the site and properly disposed of. While not commonly thought of as a hazardous material, common fertilizer can be very damaging if allowed to enter receiving waters. Fertilizers shall ' only be used in accordance with the recommendations of the supplier and any concentrations such as dribbles or leaks shall be cleaned up. In the event of a spill or other unusual event involving toxic or hazardous materials, work in the vicinity shall be immediately stopped and the follow- ing agencies notified: 111- - Washington State Department of Ecology, (206) 459-6000 during normal business hours or(206) 753-2353 after hours. I- - If the incident presents a threat to life, health, or property, the Fire and Po- lice Departments shall be notified by dialing 911. 1 ' 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 '. 2. Petroleum Spills IThe following requirements are included to ensure compliance with Part 40 of CFR 112 in cases where SPCC Plans are required. They shall be followed on all projects. IStorage of fuel for construction vehicles and fueling of construction vehicles shall be performed in accordance with the following requirements: I a. Driver Training IAll employees assigned to operate fuel trucks will be properly trained in appropriate regulations and safety procedures. Training shall include proper inspection and use of tanks,hatches, valves, pumps,hoses and fuel Idelivery equipment. b. Fueling of Vehicles IFuel nozzles shall be locked when not attended and hoses shall be re- wound or otherwise properly stored when not in use. Unattended fueling which relies on the proper operation of automatic shutoff nozzles shall not Ibe permitted. c. Parking of Fuel Tankers IParking areas for fuel trucks shall be selected such that spills will not leave the area. Fuel trucks shall not be parked closer than 25 feet to a conveyance BMP such as a grassy swale or interceptor swale. When fuel I trucks must be taken to other portions of the project to fuel equipment, they must be continuously attended or returned to the staging/storage area. Fuel trucks shall be locked with the wheels chocked when unat- Itended and not in use. d. Containment of Spills I Spills shall be immediately diked and every effort made to stop spillage. Each fuel truck shall carry a long handled shovel for use in containing spills. In the event of a spill, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, I Seattle, Washington (206) 442-1263, shall be notified as soon as possible. If the magnitude of the spill is such that it presents an immediate threat to life,health, or property, it shall be promptly reported by dialing 911. '- - N. Maintenance (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 14) This section constitutes the Operation and Maintenance Manual for the erosion and sediment control BMPs used during the construction phase of this project. Most of the various BMPs required to maintain water quality during the con- ' struction phase of this project are of a temporary nature. They are neither in- tended nor expected to remain in service for months at a time. The typical BMP 1 24 often has a life expectancy of only 6 - 12 weeks unless time and effort are ex- pended to bring it back to its original condition. Foul weather, rough use, overloading and similar conditions will reduce the life of these items. It is critical that all of the erosion and sediment control BMPs be maintained in their intended condition until they have served their purpose and are ready to be removed. The project foreman shall inspect the various parts of the system at least once daily during rainy weather. In addition, the foreman shall perform additional inspections during or immediately after significant rainfall. Any damaged or non-functioning components of the system shall be repaired before noon of the next day. ' In addition to verifying that the various BMPs are functioning as intended, the foreman shall check for formation of rills, deposits of silt and similar indications that the system is not functioning properly. If it is found that the system is not ' performing its role in preventing erosion and sedimentation, additional BMPs shall be provided as necessary. ' Specific maintenance instructions for the various erosion and sediment control BMPs are contained in the DOE Manual. ' O. Financial Liability Construction, operation, maintenance, replacement, and final removal of the ero- sion and sedimentation control BMPs is an integral part of the construction of this project. When referenced as such by the construction contract or similar documents, this plan forms a part of the construction plans for this project. In such cases the erosion and sedimentation control work is covered under applica- ble financial instruments such as the contractor's and developer's bonds to the same extent as all other items of work shown in the construction plans. it - I ' 25 I. APPENDIX I Subsection 1 ' Summary of various coefficients and operational values for the basin. 1 I. 1' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin BASIN DATA II Predevelopment I Undetained Detained = Total Area: 10.0000 (Ac) + 0.0000 (Ac) 10.0000 (Ac) Cn: 81.0 100.0 Tc: 56 (min) 56 (min) IPostdevelopment Basin Data I Undetained Detained - Total 10.0000 (Ac) + 0.0000 (Ac) 10.0000 (Ac) 81.0 100.0 Tc: 56 (min) 56 (min) RAINFALL I Peak 24 hr rainfall depth Basin Rainfall (Qr) I 2 yr storm: 1.50 (in) 4.9005 (cfs) 10 yr storm: 2.30 (in) 7.5141 (cfs) 100 yr storm: 3.20 (in) 10.4544 (cfs) IIPREDEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Peak II Pre-Devt Runoff (Qpre) 2 yr storm: 0.2162 (cfs) I 10 yr storm: 0.7697 (cfs) 100 yr storm: 1.7204 (cfs) IPOSTDEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Peak Runoff From Peak Runoff From II Undeveloped Port'n Developed Port'n (Undetained) (Detained) (Qposl) (Qpos2) 2 yr storm: 0.2162 (cfs) 0.0000 (cfs) 10 yr storm: 0.7697 (cfs) 0.0000 (cfs) 100 yr storm: 1.7204 (cfs) 0.0000 (cfs) i - Peak Runoff From Entire Basin I 2 yr storm: (Qpos) 0.2162 (cfs) 10 yr storm: 0.7697 (cfs) 100 yr storm: 1.7204 (cfs) II II I. ' APPENDIX I Subsection 2 Catalog of pre-and post-development land uses. 1 U 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 111- o o°oo °o °. 0 0 0 0 C 0• 0 0 O U p 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 r1 X •_, 0 0 0 Q x — Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 I. 4 w z .-. 10 x10100 .-I w • 000000 11 0 CO r OD CO CO CO 0 0 W C r CO CO 001 CO 1 O 9 — 0 a 4 U 0 N U 7 1' N 0 7 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ,y - 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 N 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 G 4 4 0000570 O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •.01 A ,< :4 000000 O 4 V 0 it y q Q 000000 0 7 N O 0 d 5. H 0)0 0 E1 — I 0 01 4 W 4) 11 0 y O>4 N Q m y u 4 C.4 N H' 7 o 0 7 > 41 N 0 0 O 0 4 7 7 > M A p Z 0 A w Li i y C v 4 G -I A 4 A E "'I 4 O. ~ z 7 E M O U ~ N 0 > E' w i E. 4 m$ H 0 pF •8 0 N e 11 c-4 ®o 7 w 84 4-1 14 II '+ Y H > C 0 c4 11 5-5 7 4 oin II v u Q I M N~ p1 .ci 'O' 0 N N I 0 0 y La o —1 • c 40011 E. a ,hC •x01 U'N0x 3 m W a 'JC a0t y .-� 3 m C. a o 0 •-1 .' C O — 0 r, a 0 00 0 0 0• V a 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 °, O [>i7 C o m �' 0 0 C 0 O 0 0 co 0 a m co 4 FI+ X CO m 0 m 0 X co d a 0 ? .,Cl U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •I 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 111 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II N • 0 0 0 0 0 0 p II N W W z .-I N 01 CO OJ N CO 'p d w Z d w r .i O1 O1 o4 w _ G ; U O)Ol 0 A 01 W 0i C 4 O y C r 0 Ol 01 01 0) 001 II N 0 7 4 `� O .-I c > v 0 4 Z a 7 4 11 a 4 V C .-1 I W U _ W U 0 al 7 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 "{ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 '0 U N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C U. 01 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 00 00 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O WO N•0 Q O O o O O O O O' 4 4 000000 O O 0 0 O ✓ I z 0 O O O O O % 7 �( p 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O 4 E 'o Z Q. Z Ti H 02 II II II ) 11 4 4 CO > N •� 11 II II II II 0: 4 0 10 01 0 10 0 7 c a U N 0 co 10 11) 10 "' 7 C "4 4 4 4 4 4 4-1 4 4 4 4 4 4 U ' y0j Q Q Q Q Q o W Q Q Q Q Q d W 44 N N 4 N N ,.-1 , W 4 VI N .--I W O O 7 v 7 7 n) N $y .4 C ;; 0 C O O 'C •Oi O a01 0 oC H N 4 4 4 F z 01 4 +i > > F Y v 2 w O A 0. :"P' w u 0 A a1C wv m W .-I 'qd 174 C > N O 'd W 3 d E 7 4 0 ra 11 11.-I '< 4 0 10 LI 0 01 a u A .-1 E. y0 w N d 44 EO., N :4 1-1 II 1p 7 W al .0 0 7 N C .0 t/1 E" O •C 7 E. U .0 441 F 0 w • E1 N W 4-1 rn �Fii i 0 .,1 0 W v 3 p c 3 C M r�i1 g N 5.-. 4 07C C 4 N W s C > C. w u a .-I C Q tu 45 g 4 77 in p ceK V i 3 V vilp a : . O 3 Q..a A 010 0 a D01Mtlr 9A 1 01 II 1. 1 1 APPENDIX I ' Subsection 3 Raw rainfall data for the design storms falling on the entire basin. 1 1 I I U I. II- PROJECT: Greene Drainage,g Offsite Basin 2 yr storm (A) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr II Peak Rainfall Intensity = 4 .901 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 54450 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 1.50 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative II from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip Time % Cumulative Time Rainfall Depth P Depth Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) I0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.3630 0.0060 0.0060 II 20 0.40 0.80 0.33 0.3630 0.0060 0.0120 30 0.40 1.20 0.50 0.3630 0.0060 0.0180 40 0.40 1.60 0.67 0.3630 0.0060 0.0240 50 0.40 2.00 0.83 0.3630 0.0060 0.0300 I 60 0.40 2.40 2.80 1.00 0.3630 0.0060 0.0360 70 0.40 1.17 0.3630 0.0060 0.0420 80 0.40 3.20 1.33 0.3630 0.0060 0.0480 I 90 0.40 3.60 1.50 0.3630 0.0060 0.0540 100 0.40 4 .00 1.67 0.3630 0.0060 0.0600 110 0.50 4 .50 1.83 0.4538 0.0075 0.0675 120 0.50 5.00 2.00 0.4538 0.0075 0.0750 I 130 0.50 5.50 6.00 2.17 0.4538 0.0075 0.0825 140 0.50 2.33 0.4538 0.0075 0.0900 150 0.50 6.50 2.50 0.4538 0.0075 0.0975 I 160 0.50 7.00 2.67 0.4538 0.0075 0.1050 170 0.60 7.60 2.83 0.5445 0.0090 0.1140 180 0.60 8.20 3.00 0.5445 0.0090 0.1230 190 0.60 8.80 3.17 0.5445 0.0090 0.1320 I 200 0.60 9.40 10.00 3.33 0.5445 0.0090 0.1410 210 0.60 3.50 0.5445 0.0090 0.1500 220 0.60 10.60 3.67 0.5445 0.0090 0.1590 II 230 0.70 11.30 3.83 0.6353 0.0105 0.1695 240 0.70 12.00 4.00 0.6353 0.0105 0.1800 250 0.70 12.70 4.17 0.6353 0.0105 0.1905 260 0.70 13.40 4 .33 0.6353 0.0105 0.2010 270 0.70 14 .10 4.50 0.6353 0.0105 0.2115 280 0.70 14.80 4.67 0.6353 0.0105 0.2220 290 0.82 15.62 4.83 0.7442 0.0123 0.2343 300 0.82 16.44 5.00 0.7442 0.0123 0.2466 310 0.82 17.26 5.17 0.7442 0.0123 0.2589 320 0.82 18.08 5.33 0.7442 0.0123 0.2712 330 0.82 18.90 5.50 0.7442 0.0123 0.2835 I 340 0.82 19.72 20.67 5.67 0.7442 0.0123 0.2958 350 0.95 5.83 0.8621 0.0143 0.3101 360 0.95 21.62 6.00 0.8621 0.0143 0.3243 II 370 0.95 22.57 6.17 0.8621 0.0143 0.3386 380 0.95 23.52 6.33 0.8621 0.0143 0.3528 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 2 yr storm (A) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr II Peak Rainfall Intensity = 4.901 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 54450 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 1.50 in I Rainfall Data Standard SCS Type 1A 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip I Rainfall Depth Depth Time Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) - II 390 0.95 24.47 6.50 0.8621 0.0143 0.3671 400 0.95 25.42 6.67 0.8621 0.0143 0.3813 410 1.33 26.75 6.83 1.2070 0.0200 0.4013 I 420 1.33 28.08 7.00 1.2070 0.0200 0.4212 430 1.33 29.41 7.17 1.2070 0.0200 0.4412 440 1.80 31.21 7.33 1.6335 0.0270 0.4682 I 450 1.80 33.01 36.41 7.50 1.6335 0.0270 0.4952 460 3.40 7.67 3.0855 0.0510 0.5462 470 5.40 41.81 7.83 4.9005 0.0810 0.6272 480 2.70 44.51 8.00 2.4503 0.0405 0.6677 I 490 1.80 46.31 8.17 1.6335 0.0270 0.6947 500 1.34 47.65 8.33 1.2161 0.0201 0.7148 510 1.34 48.99 8.50 1.2161 0.0201 0.7349 II 520 1.34 50.33 8.67 1.2161 0.0201 0.7550 530 0.88 51.21 8.83 0.7986 0.0132 0.7682 540 0.88 52.09 9.00 0.7986 0.0132 0.7814 550 0.88 52.97 9.17 0.7986 0.0132 0.7946 I 560 0.88 53.85 9.33 0.7986 0.0132 0.8078 570 0.88 54.73 9.50 0.7986 0.0132 0.8210 580 0.88 55.61 9.67 0.7986 0.0132 0.8342 I 590 0.88 56.49 57.37 9.83 0.7986 0.0132 0.8474 600 0.88 10.00 0.7986 0.0132 0.8606 610 0.88 58.25 10.17 0.7986 0.0132 0.8738 620 0.88 59.13 10.33 0.7986 0.0132 0.8870 II 630 0.88 60.01 10.50 0.7986 0.0132 0.9002 640 0.88 60.89 10.67 0.7986 0.0132 0.9134 650 0.72 61.61 10.83 0.6534 0.0108 0.9242 It - 660 0.72 62.33 11.00 0.6534 0.0108 0.9350 670 0.72 63.05 11.17 0.6534 0.0108 0.9458 680 0.72 63.77 11.33 0.6534 0.0108 0.9566 690 0.72 64 .49 11.50 0.6534 0.0108 0.9674 IF - 700 0.72 65.21 11.67 0.6534 0.0108 0.9782 710 0.72 65.93 11.83 0.6534 0.0108 0.9890 720 0.72 66.65 12.00 0.6534 0.0108 0.9998 730 0.72 67.37 12.17 0.6534 0.0108 1.0106 740 0.72 68.09 12.33 0.6534 0.0108 1.0214 750 0.72 68.81 12.50 0.6534 0.0108 1.0322 760 0.72 69.53 12.67 0.6534 0.0108 1.0430 II770 0.57 70.10 12.83 0.5173 0.0086 1.0515 II '. II- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 2 yr storm (A) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity = 4.901 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 54450 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 1.50 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip I Rainfall Depth Depth Time % Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) II - 780 0.57 70.67 13.00 0.5173 0.0086 1.0601 790 0.57 71.24 13.17 0.5173 0.0086 1.0686 800 0.57 71.81 13.33 0.5173 0.0086 1.0772 I810 0.57 72.38 13.50 0.5173 0.0086 1.0857 820 0.57 72.95 13.67 0.5173 0.0086 1.0943 830 0.57 73.52 13.83 0.5173 0.0086 1.1028 II 840 0.57 74 .09 14 .00 0.5173 0.0086 1.1114 850 0.57 74.66 14 .17 0.5173 0.0086 1.1199 860 0.57 75.23 14 .33 0.5173 0.0086 1.1285 870 0.57 75.80 14.50 0.5173 0.0086 1.1370 I 880 0.57 76.37 14 .67 0.5173 0.0086 1.1456 890 0.50 76.87 14 .83 0.4538 0.0075 1.1531 900 0.50 77.37 15.00 0.4538 0.0075 1.1606 I 910 0.50 77.87 15.17 0.4538 0.0075 1.1681 920 0.50 78.37 15.33 0.4538 0.0075 1.1756 930 0.50 78.87 15.50 0.4538 0.0075 1.1831 I 940 0.50 79.37 15.67 0.4538 0.0075 1.1906 950 0.50 79.87 15.83 0.4538 0.0075 1.1981 960 0.50 80.37 16.00 0.4538 0.0075 1.2056 970 0.50 80.87 16.17 0.4538 0.0075 1.2131 II 980 0.50 81.37 16.33 0.4538 0.0075 1.2206 990 0.50 81.87 16.50 0.4538 0.0075 1.2281 1000 0.50 82.37 16.67 0.4538 0.0075 1.2356 1010 0.43 82.80 16.83 0.3902 0.0065 1.2420 1020 0.40 83.20 17.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.2480 1030 0.40 83.60 17.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.2540 1040 0.40 84.00 17.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.2600 1050 0.40 84.40 17.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.2660 t 1060 0.40 84.80 17.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.2720 1070 0.40 85.20 17.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.2780 1080 0.40 85.60 18.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.2840 1090 0.40 86.00 18.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.2900 1100 0.40 86.40 18.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.2960 1110 0.40 86.80 18.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.3020 II 1120 0.40 87.20 18.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.3080 1130 0.40 87.60 18.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.3140 1140 0.40 88.00 19.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.3200 1150 0.40 88.40 19.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.3260 II1160 0.40 88.80 19.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.3320 II I. II' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 2 yr storm (A) 1 Total Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity = 4.901 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 54450 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 1.50 in IStandard SCS Type lA Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip I Time Rainfall Depth Cumulative Time P Depth Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) 1 1170 0.40 89.20 19.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.3380 1180 0.40 89.60 19.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.3440 I 1190 0.40 90.00 19.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.3500 1200 0.40 90.40 20.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.3560 1210 0.40 90.80 20.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.3620 1220 0.40 91.20 20.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.3680 1 1230 0.40 91.60 92.00 20.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.3740 1240 0.40 20.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.3800 1250 0.40 92.40 20.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.3860 1260 0.40 92.80 21.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.3920 1 1270 0.40 93.20 21.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.3980 1280 0.40 93.60 21.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.4040 1290 0.40 94.00 21.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.4100 1 1300 0.40 94 .40 21.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.4160 1310 0.40 94 .80 21.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.4220 1320 0.40 95.20 22.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.4280 1330 0.40 95.60 22.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.4340 1 1340 0.40 96.00 22.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.4400 1350 0.40 96.40 22.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.4460 1360 0.40 96.80 22.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.4520 1 1370 0.40 97.20 22.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.4580 1380 0.40 97.60 23.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.4640 1390 0.40 98.00 23.17 0.3630 0.0060 1.4700 1400 0.40 98.40 23.33 0.3630 0.0060 1.4760 1 1410 0.40 98.80 23.50 0.3630 0.0060 1.4820 1420 0.40 99.20 23.67 0.3630 0.0060 1.4880 1430 0.40 99.60 23.83 0.3630 0.0060 1.4940 1440 0.40 100.00 24.00 0.3630 0.0060 1.5000 1y 1450 0.00 100.00 24.17 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 1460 0.00 100.00 24.33 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 1470 0.00 100.00 24.50 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 1480 0.00 100.00 24.67 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 1490 0.00 100.00 24.83 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 1500 0.00 100.00 25.00 0.0000 0.0000 1.5000 II 100.00 1.5000 1 1 1 1 ,. II' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 10 yr storm (B) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity = 7.514 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 83490 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 2.30 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative I from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip Rainfall Depth Depth Time Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) il0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.5566 0.0092 0.0092 I 20 0.40 0.80 0.33 0.5566 0.0092 0.0184 30 0.40 1.20 0.50 0.5566 0.0092 0.0276 40 0.40 1.60 0.67 0.5566 0.0092 0.0368 50 0.40 2.00 0.83 0.5566 0.0092 0.0460 I 60 0.40 2.40 2.80 1.00 0.5566 0.0092 0.0552 70 0.40 1.17 0.5566 0.0092 0.0644 80 0.40 3.20 1.33 0.5566 0.0092 0.0736 I 90 0.40 3.60 1.50 0.5566 0.0092 0.0828 100 0.40 4 .00 1.67 0.5566 0.0092 0.0920 110 0.50 4 .50 1.83 0.6958 0.0115 0.1035 120 0.50 5.00 2.00 0.6958 0.0115 0.1150 I 130 0.50 5.50 6.00 2.17 0.6958 0.0115 0.1265 140 0.50 2.33 0.6958 0.0115 0.1380 150 0.50 6.50 2.50 0.6958 0.0115 0.1495 160 0.50 7.00 2.67 0.6958 0.0115 0.1610 I 170 0.60 7.60 2.83 0.8349 0.0138 0.1748 180 0.60 8.20 3.00 0.8349 0.0138 0.1886 190 0.60 8.80 3.17 0.8349 0.0138 0.2024 1 200 0.60 9.40 3.33 0.8349 0.0138 0.2162 210 0.60 10.00 3.50 0.8349 0.0138 0.2300 220 0.60 10.60 3.67 0.8349 0.0138 0.2438 230 0.70 11.30 3.83 0.9740 0.0161 0.2599 I 240 0.70 12.00 4.00 0.9740 0.0161 0.2760 250 0.70 12.70 4.17 0.9740 0.0161 0.2921 260 0.70 13.40 4.33 0.9740 0.0161 0.3082 270 0.70 14.10 4 .50 0.9740 0.0161 0.3243 280 0.70 14.80 4 .67 0.9740 0.0161 0.3404 290 0.82 15.62 4.83 1.1410 0.0189 0.3593 300 0.82 16.44 5.00 1.1410 0.0189 0.3781 310 0.82 17.26 5.17 1.1410 0.0189 0.3970 320 0.82 18.08 5.33 1.1410 0.0189 0.4158 330 0.82 18.90 5.50 1.1410 0.0189 0.4347 I 340 0.82 19.72 5.67 1.1410 0.0189 0.4536 350 0.95 20.67 5.83 1.3219 0.0219 0.4754 360 0.95 21.62 6.00 1.3219 0.0219 0.4973 370 0.95 22.57 6.17 1.3219 0.0219 0.5191 II 380 0.95 23.52 6.33 1.3219 0.0219 0.5410 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t. II- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 10 yr storm (B) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity = 7.514 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 83490 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 2.30 in IStandard SCS Type lA Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip I Time Rainfall Depth Depth Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) II390 0.95 24.47 6.50 1.3219 0.0219 0.5628 400 0.95 25.42 6.67 1.3219 0.0219 0.5847 I 410 1.33 26.75 6.83 1.8507 0.0306 0.6153 420 1.33 28.08 7.00 1.8507 0.0306 0.6458 430 1.33 29.41 7.17 1.8507 0.0306 0.6764 440 1.80 31.21 7.33 2.5047 0.0414 0.7178 II 450 1.80 33.01 7.50 2.5047 0.0414 0.7592 460 3.40 36.41 7.67 4.7311 0.0782 0.8374 470 5.40 41.81 7.83 7.5141 0.1242 0.9616 480 2.70 44.51 8.00 3.7571 0.0621 1.0237 I 490 1.80 46.31 8.17 2.5047 0.0414 1.0651 500 1.34 47.65 8.33 1.8646 0.0308 1.0960 510 1.34 48.99 8.50 1.8646 0.0308 1.1268 I 520 1.34 50.33 51.21 8.67 1.8646 0.0308 1.1576 530 0.88 8.83 1.2245 0.0202 1.1778 540 0.88 52.09 9.00 1.2245 0.0202 1.1981 550 0.88 52.97 9.17 1.2245 0.0202 1.2183 I 560 0.88 53.85 9.33 1.2245 0.0202 1.2386 570 0.88 54.73 9.50 1.2245 0.0202 1.2588 580 0.88 55.61 9.67 1.2245 0.0202 1.2790 II 590 0.88 56.49 9.83 1.2245 0.0202 1.2993 600 0.88 57.37 10.00 1.2245 0.0202 1.3195 610 0.88 58.25 10.17 1.2245 0.0202 1.3398 620 0.88 59.13 10.33 1.2245 0.0202 1.3600 I 630 0.88 60.01 10.50 1.2245 0.0202 1.3802 640 0.88 60.89 10.67 1.2245 0.0202 1.4005 650 0.72 61.61 10.83 1.0019 0.0166 1.4170 660 0.72 62.33 11.00 1.0019 0.0166 1.4336 670 0.72 63.05 11.17 1.0019 0.0166 1.4502 680 0.72 63.77 11.33 1.0019 0.0166 1.4667 li - 690 0.72 64.49 11.50 1.0019 0.0166 1.4833 700 0.72 65.21 11.67 1.0019 0.0166 1.4998 710 0.72 65.93 11.83 1.0019 0.0166 1.5164 720 0.72 66.65 12.00 1.0019 0.0166 1.5330 I 730 0.72 67.37 12.17 1.0019 0.0166 1.5495 740 0.72 68.09 12.33 1.0019 0.0166 1.5661 750 0.72 68.81 12.50 1.0019 0.0166 1.5826 760 0.72 69.53 12.67 1.0019 0.0166 1.5992 II770 0.57 70.10 12.83 0.7932 0.0131 1.6123 II '- ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 10 yr storm (B) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity 7.514 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 83490 Cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall 2.30 in I Rainfall Data Standard SCS Type lA 24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip II Rainfall Depth Depth Time Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) II780 0.57 70.67 13.00 0.7932 0.0131 1.6254 790 0.57 71.24 13.17 0.7932 0.0131 1.6385 800 0.57 71.81 13.33 0.7932 0.0131 1.6516 I 810 0.57 72.38 13.50 0.7932 0.0131 1.6647 820 0.57 72.95 13.67 0.7932 0.0131 1.6779 830 0.57 73.52 13.83 0.7932 0.0131 1.6910 I 840 0.57 74 .09 74.66 14 .00 0.7932 0.0131 1.7041 850 0.57 14 .17 0.7932 0.0131 1.7172 860 0.57 75.23 14 .33 0.7932 0.0131 1.7303 870 0.57 75.80 14 .50 0.7932 0.0131 1.7434 II 880 0.57 76.37 14.67 0.7932 0.0131 1.7565 890 0.50 76.87 14 .83 0.6958 0.0115 1.7680 900 0.50 77.37 15.00 0.6958 0.0115 1.7795 I 910 0.50 77.87 78.37 15.17 0.6958 0.0115 1.7910 920 0.50 15.33 0.6958 0.0115 1.8025 930 0.50 78.87 15.50 0.6958 0.0115 1.8140 940 0.50 79.37 15.67 0.6958 0.0115 1.8255 I 950 0.50 79.87 15.83 0.6958 0.0115 1.8370 960 0.50 80.37 16.00 0.6958 0.0115 1.8485 970 0.50 80.87 16.17 0.6958 0.0115 1.8600 I 980 0.50 81.37 81.87 16.33 0.6958 0.0115 1.8715 990 0.50 16.50 0.6958 0.0115 1.8830 1000 0.50 82.37 16.67 0.6958 0.0115 1.8945 1010 0.43 82.80 16.83 0.5983 0.0099 1.9044 I 1020 0.40 83.20 17.00 0.5566 0.0092 1.9136 1030 0.40 83.60 17.17 0.5566 0.0092 1.9228 1040 0.40 84 .00 17.33 0.5566 0.0092 1.9320 1050 0.40 84.40 17.50 0.5566 0.0092 1.9412 1060 0.40 84.80 17.67 0.5566 0.0092 1.9504 1070 0.40 85.20 17.83 0.5566 0.0092 1.9596 1080 0.40 85.60 18.00 0.5566 0.0092 1.9688 I 1090 0.40 86.00 86.40 18.17 0.5566 0.0092 1.9780 1100 0.40 18.33 0.5566 0.0092 1.9872 1110 0.40 86.80 18.50 0.5566 0.0092 1.9964 I 1120 0.40 87.20 18.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.0056 1130 0.40 87.60 18.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.0148 1140 0.40 88.00 19.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.0240 1150 0.40 88.40 19.17 0.5566 0.0092 2.0332 II1160 0.40 88.80 19.33 0.5566 0.0092 2.0424 1 I ,- ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 10 yr storm (B) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr Peak Rainfall Intensity = 7.514 cfs I Total Rainfall Volume = 83490 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 2.30 in IStandard SCS Type lA Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip II Rainfall Depth Depth Time % Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) 1170 0.40 89.20 19.50 0.5566 0.0092 2.0516 1180 0.40 89.60 19.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.0608 1190 0.40 90.00 19.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.0700 II 1200 0.40 90.40 20.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.0792 1210 0.40 90.80 20.17 0.5566 0.0092 2.0884 1220 0.40 91.20 20.33 0.5566 0.0092 2.0976 I 1230 0.40 91.60 92.00 20.50 0.5566 0.0092 2.1068 1240 0.40 20.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.1160 1250 0.40 92.40 20.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.1252 1260 0.40 92.80 21.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.1344 II 1270 0.40 93.20 21.17 0.5566 0.0092 2.1436 1280 0.40 93.60 21.33 0.5566 0.0092 2.1528 1290 0.40 94 .00 21.50 0.5566 0.0092 2.1620 I 1300 0.40 94.40 21.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.1712 1310 0.40 94.80 21.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.1804 1320 0.40 95.20 22.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.1896 1330 0.40 95.60 22.17 0.5566 0.0092 2.1988 I 1340 0.40 96.00 22.33 0.5566 0.0092 2.2080 1350 0.40 96.40 22.50 0.5566 0.0092 2.2172 1360 0.40 96.80 22.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.2264 I 1370 0.40 97.20 97.60 22.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.2356 1380 0.40 23.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.2448 1390 0.40 98.00 23.17 0.5566 0.0092 2.2540 1400 0.40 98.40 23.33 0.5566 0.0092 2.2632 II 1410 0.40 98.80 23.50 0.5566 0.0092 2.2724 1420 0.40 99.20 23.67 0.5566 0.0092 2.2816 1430 0.40 99.60 23.83 0.5566 0.0092 2.2908 1440 0.40 100.00 24.00 0.5566 0.0092 2.3000 1450 0.00 100.00 24 .17 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 1460 0.00 100.00 24.33 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 II 1470 0.00 100.00 24.50 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 1480 0.00 100.00 24.67 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 1490 0.00 100.00 24.83 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 1500 0.00 100.00 25.00 0.0000 0.0000 2.3000 1 100.00 2.3000 II II I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 100 yr storm (C) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr I Peak Rainfall Intensity = 10.454 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 116160 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 3.20 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative I from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip Rainfall Depth Depth Time Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) f0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.7744 0.0128 0.0128 I 20 0.40 0.80 0.33 0.7744 0.0128 0.0256 30 0.40 1.20 0.50 0.7744 0.0128 0.0384 40 0.40 1.60 0.67 0.7744 0.0128 0.0512 50 0.40 2.00 0.83 0.7744 0.0128 0.0640 I 60 0.40 2.40 2.80 1.00 0.7744 0.0128 0.0768 70 0.40 1.17 0.7744 0.0128 0.0896 80 0.40 3.20 1.33 0.7744 0.0128 0.1024 II 90 0.40 3.60 1.50 0.7744 0.0128 0.1152 100 0.40 4.00 1.67 0.7744 0.0128 0.1280 110 0.50 4.50 1.83 0.9680 0.0160 0.1440 120 0.50 5.00 2.00 0.9680 0.0160 0.1600 I 130 0.50 5.50 6.00 2.17 0.9680 0.0160 0.1760 140 0.50 2.33 0.9680 0.0160 0.1920 150 0.50 6.50 2.50 0.9680 0.0160 0.2080 I 160 0.50 7.00 2.67 0.9680 0.0160 0.2240 170 0.60 7.60 2.83 1.1616 0.0192 0.2432 180 0.60 8.20 3.00 1.1616 0.0192 0.2624 190 0.60 8.80 3.17 1.1616 0.0192 0.2816 I 200 0.60 9.40 10.00 3.33 1.1616 0.0192 0.3008 210 0.60 3.50 1.1616 0.0192 0.3200 220 0.60 10.60 3.67 1.1616 0.0192 0.3392 I 230 0.70 11.30 3.83 1.3552 0.0224 0.3616 240 0.70 12.00 4 .00 1.3552 0.0224 0.3840 250 0.70 12.70 4.17 1.3552 0.0224 0.4064 260 0.70 13.40 4.33 1.3552 0.0224 0.4288 270 0.70 14 .10 4.50 1.3552 0.0224 0.4512 280 0.70 14 .80 4.67 1.3552 0.0224 0.4736 290 0.82 15.62 4.83 1.5875 0.0262 0.4998 300 0.82 16.44 5.00 1.5875 0.0262 0.5261 310 0.82 17.26 5.17 1.5875 0.0262 0.5523 320 0.82 18.08 5.33 1.5875 0.0262 0.5786 330 0.82 18.90 5.50 1.5875 0.0262 0.6048 II 340 0.82 19.72 5.67 1.5875 0.0262 0.6310 350 0.95 20.67 5.83 1.8392 0.0304 0.6614 360 0.95 21.62 6.00 1.8392 0.0304 0.6918 II 370 0.95 22.57 6.17 1.8392 0.0304 0.7222 380 0.95 23.52 6.33 1.8392 0.0304 0.7526 II II II' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 100 yr storm (C) rTotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr II Peak Rainfall Intensity = 10.454 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 116160 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 3.20 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip I Rainfall Depth Depth Time % Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) I390 0.95 24 .47 6.50 1.8392 0.0304 0.7830 400 0.95 25.42 6.67 1.8392 0.0304 0.8134 410 1.33 26.75 6.83 2.5749 0.0426 0.8560 I 420 1.33 28.08 7.00 2.5749 0.0426 0.8986 430 1.33 29.41 7.17 2.5749 0.0426 0.9411 440 1.80 31.21 7.33 3.4848 0.0576 0.9987 I 450 1.80 33.01 36.41 7.50 3.4848 0.0576 1.0563 460 3.40 7.67 6.5824 0.1088 1.1651 470 5.40 41.81 7.83 10.4544 0.1728 1.3379 II 480 2.70 44 .51 8.00 5.2272 0.0864 1.4243 490 1.80 46.31 8.17 3.4848 0.0576 1.4819 500 1.34 47.65 8.33 2.5942 0.0429 1.5248 510 1.34 48.99 8.50 2.5942 0.0429 1.5677 I 520 1.34 50.33 51.21 8.67 2.5942 0.0429 1.6106 530 0.88 8.83 1.7037 0.0282 1.6387 540 0.88 52.09 9.00 1.7037 0.0282 1.6669 550 0.88 52.97 9.17 1.7037 0.0282 1.6950 I 560 0.88 53.85 9.33 1.7037 0.0282 1.7232 570 0.88 54.73 9.50 1.7037 0.0282 1.7514 580 0.88 55.61 9.67 1.7037 0.0282 1.7795 I 590 0.88 56.49 57.37 9.83 1.7037 0.0282 1.8077 600 0.88 10.00 1.7037 0.0282 1.8358 610 0.88 58.25 10.17 1.7037 0.0282 1.8640 620 0.88 59.13 10.33 1.7037 0.0282 1.8922 I 630 0.88 60.01 10.50 1.7037 0.0282 1.9203 640 0.88 60.89 10.67 1.7037 0.0282 1.9485 650 0.72 61.61 10.83 1.3939 0.0230 1.9715 660 0.72 62.33 11.00 1.3939 0.0230 1.9946 670 0.72 63.05 11.17 1.3939 0.0230 2.0176 680 0.72 63.77 11.33 1.3939 0.0230 2.0406 690 0.72 64.49 11.50 1.3939 0.0230 2.0637 700 0.72 65.21 11.67 1.3939 0.0230 2.0867 710 0.72 65.93 11.83 1.3939 0.0230 2.1098 720 0.72 66.65 12.00 1.3939 0.0230 2.1328 I 730 0.72 67.37 12.17 1.3939 0.0230 2.1558 740 0.72 68.09 12.33 1.3939 0.0230 2.1789 750 0.72 68.81 12.50 1.3939 0.0230 2.2019 760 0.72 69.53 12.67 1.3939 0.0230 2.2250 II770 0.57 70.10 12.83 1.1035 0.0182 2.2432 II 1- ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 100 yr storm (C) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr II Peak Rainfall Intensity = 10.454 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 116160 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 3.20 in IStandard SCS Type 1A Rainfall Data 24 hr hyetograph (adj 'd) Total Cumulative I from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip Rainfall Depth Depth Time Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) II780 0.57 70.67 13.00 1.1035 0.0182 2.2614 790 0.57 71.24 13.17 1.1035 0.0182 2.2797 II 800 0.57 71.81 13.33 1.1035 0.0182 2.2979 810 0.57 72.38 13.50 1.1035 0.0182 2.3162 820 0.57 72.95 13.67 1.1035 0.0182 2.3344 830 0.57 73.52 13.83 1.1035 0.0182 2.3526 II 840 0.57 74 .09 14 .00 1.1035 0.0182 2.3709 850 0.57 74 .66 14 .17 1.1035 0.0182 2.3891 860 0.57 75.23 14.33 1.1035 0.0182 2.4074 I 870 0.57 75.80 14 .50 1.1035 0.0182 2.4256 880 0.57 76.37 14 .67 1.1035 0.0182 2.4438 890 0.50 76.87 14 .83 0.9680 0.0160 2.4598 900 0.50 77.37 15.00 0.9680 0.0160 2.4758 I 910 0.50 77.87 78.37 15.17 0.9680 0.0160 2.4918 920 0.50 15.33 0.9680 0.0160 2.5078 930 0.50 78.87 15.50 0.9680 0.0160 2.5238 I 940 0.50 79.37 15.67 0.9680 0.0160 2.5398 950 0.50 79.87 15.83 0.9680 0.0160 2.5558 960 0.50 80.37 16.00 0.9680 0.0160 2.5718 970 0.50 80.87 16.17 0.9680 0.0160 2.5878 I 980 0.50 81.37 81.87 16.33 0.9680 0.0160 2.6038 990 0.50 16.50 0.9680 0.0160 2.6198 1000 0.50 82.37 16.67 0.9680 0.0160 2.6358 11 1010 0.43 82.80 16.83 0.8325 0.0138 2.6496 1020 0.40 83.20 17.00 0.7744 0.0128 2.6624 1030 0.40 83.60 17.17 0.7744 0.0128 2.6752 1040 0.40 84.00 17.33 0.7744 0.0128 2.6880 1050 0.40 84 .40 17.50 0.7744 0.0128 2.7008 1060 0.40 84 .80 17.67 0.7744 0.0128 2.7136 1070 0.40 85.20 17.83 0.7744 0.0128 2.7264 I _ 1080 0.40 85.60 18.00 0.7744 0.0128 2.7392 1090 0.40 86.00 18.17 0.7744 0.0128 2.7520 1100 0.40 86.40 18.33 0.7744 0.0128 2.7648 1110 0.40 86.80 18.50 0.7744 0.0128 2.7776 I 1120 0.40 87.20 87.60 18.67 0.7744 0.0128 2.7904 1130 0.40 18.83 0.7744 0.0128 2.8032 1140 0.40 88.00 19.00 0.7744 0.0128 2.8160 I 1150 0.40 88.40 19.17 0.7744 0.0128 2.8288 1160 0.40 88.80 19.33 0.7744 0.0128 2.8416 ,- ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin 100 yr storm (C) ITotal Basin Area = 435600 sq ft = 10.0000 Ac Storm Duration = 24 hr II Peak Rainfall Intensity = 10.454 cfs Total Rainfall Volume = 116160 cu ft Total, 24 hr rainfall = 3.20 in I Rainfall Data Standard SCS Type lA 24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip 11 Rainfall Depth Depth Time % Cumulative Time P Pr Prc (min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in) II1170 0.40 89.20 19.50 0.7744 0.0128 2.8544 1180 0.40 89.60 19.67 0.7744 0.0128 2.8672 1190 0.40 90.00 19.83 0.7744 0.0128 2.8800 I 1200 0.40 90.40 20.00 0.7744 0.0128 2.8928 1210 0.40 90.80 20.17 0.7744 0.0128 2.9056 1220 0.40 91.20 20.33 0.7744 0.0128 2.9184 I 1230 0.40 91.60 92.00 20.50 0.7744 0.0128 2.9312 1240 0.40 20.67 0.7744 0.0128 2.9440 1250 0.40 92.40 20.83 0.7744 0.0128 2.9568 1260 0.40 92.80 21.00 0.7744 0.0128 2.9696 I 1270 0.40 93.20 21.17 0.7744 0.0128 2.9824 1280 0.40 93.60 21.33 0.7744 0.0128 2.9952 1290 0.40 94 .00 21.50 0.7744 0.0128 3.0080 I 1300 0.40 94 .40 94.80 21.67 0.7744 0.0128 3.0208 1310 0.40 21.83 0.7744 0.0128 3.0336 1320 0.40 95.20 22.00 0.7744 0.0128 3.0464 1330 0.40 95.60 22.17 0.7744 0.0128 3.0592 I 1340 0.40 96.00 22.33 0.7744 0.0128 3.0720 1350 0.40 96.40 22.50 0.7744 0.0128 3.0848 1360 0.40 96.80 22.67 0.7744 0.0128 3.0976 I 1370 0.40 97.20 97.60 22.83 0.7744 0.0128 3.1104 1380 0.40 23.00 0.7744 0.0128 3.1232 1390 0.40 98.00 23.17 0.7744 0.0128 3.1360 1400 0.40 98.40 23.33 0.7744 0.0128 3.1488 1 1410 0.40 98.80 23.50 0.7744 0.0128 3.1616 1420 0.40 99.20 23.67 0.7744 0.0128 3.1744 1430 0.40 99.60 23.83 0.7744 0.0128 3.1872 1440 0.40 100.00 24.00 0.7744 0.0128 3.2000 1450 0.00 100.00 24.17 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 1460 0.00 100.00 24.33 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 1470 0.00 100.00 24.50 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 1480 0.00 100.00 24.67 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 1490 0.00 100.00 24.83 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 1500 0.00 100.00 25.00 0.0000 0.0000 3.2000 I100.00 3.2000 II II 1 t 1 1 ' APPENDIX I Subsection 4 Pre-development runoff calculations for the design storms. 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,- III_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 2 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.2162 cfs 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = O.O820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R c Q1 Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) R (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [0.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0060 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0120 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0180 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [0.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0300 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0360 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0420 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0480 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0675 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0750 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0825 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0900 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0975 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.1050 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1230 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [3.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1410 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1500 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1590 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1695 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1905 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.33) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2010 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [9.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2115 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2220 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2343 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2466 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2589 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2712 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2835 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2958 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0143 0.3101 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3243 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3386 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0143 0.3528 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3671 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3813 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 0.4013 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (7.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0199 0.4212 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [7.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 0.4412 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [7.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0270 0.4682 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [7.50] 0.0003 0.0003 0.0173 10 0.0014 0.0270 0.4952 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0014 [7.67] 0.0022 0.0024 0.1309 89 0.0133 0.0510 0.5462 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0133 [7.83] 0.0075 0.0100 0.4552 362 0.0592 0.0810 0.6272 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0592 [8.00] 0.0055 0.0155 0.3338 562 0.1141 0.0405 0.6677 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1141 (8.17] 0.0043 0.0198 0.2595 718 0.1441 0.0270 0.6947 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1441 I [8.33] 0.0035 0.0233 0.2118 845 0.1591 0.0201 0.7148 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1591 [8.50] 0.0038 0.0270 0.2273 981 0.1690 0.0201 0.7349 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1690 [8.67] 0.0040 0.0310 0.2424 1127 0.1798 0.0201 0.7550 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1798 (8.83] 0.0028 0.0338 0.1672 1227 0.1839 0.0132 0.7682 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1839 [9.00] 0.0029 0.0367 0.1735 1331 0.1817 0.0132 0.7814 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1817 I [9.17] 0.0030 0.0396 0.1797 1439 0.1808 0.0132 0.7946 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1808 [9.33] 0.0031 0.0427 0.1858 1551 0.1811 0.0132 0.8078 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1811 '- '_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 2 yr storm (A) Qpeak ■ Vtotal = 0.2162 cis 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area - 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in IRouting Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) I (9.50) 0.0032 0.0459 0.1918 1666 0.1824 0.0132 0.8210 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1824 [9.67] 0.0033 0.0492 0.1977 1784 0.1844 0.0132 0.8342 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1844 [9.83] 0.0034 0.0525 0.2035 1906 0.1871 0.0132 0.8474 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1871 [10.00] 0.0035 0.0560 0.2092 2032 0.1902 0.0132 0.8606 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1902 [10.17] 0.0036 0.0595 0.2149 2161 0.1938 0.0132 0.8738 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1938 I [10.33] 0.0036 0.0632 0.2205 2293 0.1977 0.0132 0.8870 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1977 [10.50] 0.0037 0.0669 0.2260 2429 0.2019 0.0132 0.9002 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2019 [10.67] 0.0038 0.0707 0.2314 2567 0.2063 0.0132 0.9134 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2063 [10.83] 0.0032 0.0739 0.1933 2683 0.2073 0.0108 0.9242 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2073 [11.00] 0.0033 0.0772 0.1968 2802 0.2053 0.0108 0.9350 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2053 I [11.17] 0.0033 0.0805 0.2003 2922 0.2042 0.0108 0.9458 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2042 [11.33] 0.0034 0.0839 0.2038 3044 0.2038 0.0108 0.9566 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2038 [11.50] 0.0034 0.0873 0.2072 3168 0.2041 0.0108 0.9674 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2041 [11.67] 0.0035 0.0908 0.2106 3295 0.2049 0.0108 0.9782 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2049 [11.83] 0.0035 0.0943 0.2139 3423 0.2061 0.0108 0.9890 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2061 I [12.00] 0.0036 0.0979 0.2172 3553 0.2076 0.0108 0.9998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2076 [12.17] 0.0036 0.1015 0.2205 3686 0.2095 0.0108 1.0106 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2095 [12.33] 0.0037 0.1052 0.2237 3820 0.2115 0.0108 1.0214 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2115 [12.50] 0.0038 0.1090 0.2269 3956 0.2138 0.0108 1.0322 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2138 [12.67] 0.0038 0.1128 0.2300 4094 0.2162 0.0108 1.0430 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2162 I [12.83] 0.0030 0.1158 0.1843 4205 0.2147 0.0085 1.0515 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2147 [13.00] 0.0031 0.1189 0.1863 4316 0.2099 0.0086 1.0601 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2099 [13.17] 0.0031 0.1220 0.1882 4429 0.2062 0.0086 1.0686 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2062 [13.33] 0.0031 0.1252 0.1901 4543 0.2034 0.0086 1.0772 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2034 [13.50] 0.0032 0.1283 0.1920 4658 0.2014 0.0085 1.0857 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2014 I [13.67] 0.0032 0.1315 0.1939 4775 0.2000 0.0086 1.0943 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2000 [13.83] 0.0032 0.1348 0.1957 4892 0.1991 0.0086 1.1028 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1991 [14.00] 0.0033 0.1380 0.1976 5011 0.1987 0.0086 1.1114 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1987 [14.17] 0.0033 0.1413 0.1994 5130 0.1987 0.0085 1.1199 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1987 [14.33] 0.0033 0.1447 0.2012 5251 0.1989 0.0086 1.1285 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1989 I (14.50] 0.0034 0.1480 0.2030 5373 0.1995 0.0086 1.1370 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1995 [19.67] 0.0034 0.1514 0.2048 5496 0.2002 0.0085 1.1456 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2002 [14.63] 0.0030 0.1544 0.1811 5604 0.1990 0.0075 1.1531 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1990 [15.00] 0.0030 0.1574 0.1824 5714 0.1962 0.0075 1.1606 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1962 [15.17] 0.0030 0.1604 0.1837 5824 0.1940 0.0075 1.1681 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1940 1 [15.33] 0.0031 0.1635 0.1851 5935 0.1924 0.0075 1.1756 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1924 [15.50] 0.0031 0.1666 0.1864 6047 0.1913 0.0075 1.1831 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1913 [15.67] 0.0031 0.1697 0.1877 6160 0.1906 0.0075 1.1906 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1906 [15.83] 0.0031 0.1728 0.1890 6273 0.1903 0.0075 1.1981 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1903 III [16.00] 0.0031 0.1760 0.1903 6387 0.1902 0.0075 1.2056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1902 . (16.17) 0.0032 0.1791 0.1916 6502 0.1903 0.0075 1.2131 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1903 [16.33] 0.0032 0.1823 0.1928 6618 0.1906 0.0075 1.2206 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1906 (16.50] 0.0032 0.1855 0.1941 6734 0.1911 0.0075 1.2281 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1911 [16.67] 0.0032 0.1887 0.1953 6851 0.1917 0.0075 1.2356 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1917 [16.83] 0.0028 0.1915 0.1690 6953 0.1901 0.0065 1.2420 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1901 [17.00] 0.0026 0.1941 0.1580 7048 0.1858 0.0060 1.2480 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1858 [17.17] 0.0026 0.1968 0.1588 7143 0.1813 0.0060 1.2540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1813 (17.33] 0.0026 0.1994 0.1596 7239 0.1777 0.0060 1.2600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1777 [17.50) 0.0027 0.2021 0.1604 7335 0.1748 0.0060 1.2660 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1748 1 [17.67] 0.0027 0.2047 0.1611 7432 0.1725 0.0060 1.2720 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1725 [17.83] 0.0027 0.2074 0.1619 7529 0.1707 0.0060 1.2780 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1707 [18.00] 0.0027 0.2101 0.1627 7626 0.1693 0.0060 1.2840 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1693 (18.17] 0.0027 0.2128 0.1634 7724 0.1683 0.0060 1.2900 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1683 [18.33] 0.0027 0.2155 0.1642 7823 0.1675 0.0060 1.2960 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1675 I [18.50] 0.0027 0.2182 0.1649 7922 0.1670 0.0060 1.3020 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1670 [18.67] 0.0027 0.2210 0.1657 8021 0.1668 0.0060 1.3080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1668 [18.83] 0.0028 0.2237 0.1664 8121 0.1666 0.0060 1.3140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1666 '- III- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 2 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.2162 cfs 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area m 435600 sq ft Impervious Area - 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in IRouting Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- I TimeExcess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff R Rc Qi Vc Or R Rc Qi Vc Or Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) I [19.00] 0.0028 0.2265 0.1672 8221 0.1667 0.0060 1.3200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1667 [19.17] 0.0028 0.2293 0.1679 8322 0.1668 0.0060 1.3260 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1668 [19.33] 0.0028 0.2320 0.1686 8423 0.1670 0.0060 1.3320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1670 [19.50] 0.0028 0.2348 0.1694 8525 0.1674 0.0060 1.3380 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1674 [19.67] 0.0028 0.2377 0.1701 8627 0.1678 0.0060 1.3440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1678 I [19.83] 0.0028 0.2405 0.1708 8729 0.1682 0.0060 1.3500 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1682 [20.00] 0.0028 0.2433 0.1715 8832 0.1687 0.0060 1.3560 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1687 [20.17] 0.0028 0.2462 0.1722 8936 0.1692 0.0060 1.3620 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1692 [20.33] 0.0029 0.2490 0.1729 9039 0.1697 0.0060 1.3680 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1697 [20.50] 0.0029 0.2519 0.1736 9144 0.1703 0.0060 1.3740 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1703 I [20.67] 0.0029 0.2548 0.1743 9248 0.1709 0.0060 1.3800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1709 [20.83] 0.0029 0.2577 0.1750 9353 0.1715 0.0060 1.3860 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1715 (21.00] 0.0029 0.2606 0.1757 9459 0.1722 0.0060 1.3920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1722 [21.17] 0.0029 0.2635 0.1764 9564 0.1728 0.0060 1.3980 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1728 (21.33] 0.0029 0.2664 0.1771 9671 0.1734 0.0060 1.4040 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1734 I [21.50] 0.0029 0.2693 0.1777 9777 0.1741 0.0060 1.4100 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1741 [21.67] 0.0029 0.2723 0.1784 9884 0.1747 0.0060 1.4160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1747 [21.83] 0.0030 0.2753 0.1791 9992 0.1754 0.0060 1.4220 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1754 [22.00] 0.0030 0.2782 0.1798 10100 0.1761 0.0060 1.4280 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1761 [22.17] 0.0030 0.2812 0.1804 10208 0.1767 0.0060 1.4340 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1767 I [22.33] 0.0030 0.2842 0.1811 10317 0.1774 0.0060 1.4400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1774 [22.50] 0.0030 0.2872 0.1817 10426 0.1780 0.0060 1.4460 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1780 [22.67] 0.0030 0.2902 0.1824 10535 0.1787 0.0060 1.4520 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1787 [22.83] 0.0030 0.2932 0.1830 10645 0.1794 0.0060 1.4580 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1794 [23.00) 0.0030 0.2963 0.1837 10755 0.1800 0.0060 1.4640 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1800 I [23.17) 0.0030 0.2993 0.1843 10866 0.1807 0.0060 1.4700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1807 [23.33] 0.0031 0.3024 0.1850 10977 0.1813 0.0060 1.4760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1813 [23.50] 0.0031 0.3055 0.1856 11088 0.1820 0.0060 1.4820 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1820 [23.67] 0.0031 0.3085 0.1862 11200 0.1826 0.0060 1.4880 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1826 [23.83) 0.0031 0.3116 0.1869 11312 0.1833 0.0060 1.4940 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1833 [24.00) 0.0031 0.3147 0.1875 11425 0.1839 0.0060 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1839 [24.17) 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1691 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1691 [29.33) 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1414 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1414 [24.50] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1182 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1182 [24.67] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.0988 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0988 [24.83) 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.0826 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0826 [25.00] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 114 25 0.0691 0.0000 1.5000 I 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0691 0.3147 19.0408 1.5000 0.0000 I I I I '. IIIPROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method 1 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.7697 cfs 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area .. 435600 sq ft Impervious Area s 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in 1 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs( (Cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) (0.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0092 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0184 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0276 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0368 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0460 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0552 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0644 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0736 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0828 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I (1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1035 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1150 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1265 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1380 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1495 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1610 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.1748 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.1886 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2024 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [3.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2162 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2300 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2438 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (3.83) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2599 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2921 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3082 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3243 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3404 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3593 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [5.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3781 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3970 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4158 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4347 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4536 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 1 0.0001 0.0218 0.4754 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0001 [6.00] 0.0003 0.0003 0.0191 12 0.0017 0.0218 0.4973 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0017 [6.17] 0.0007 0.0010 0.0429 38 0.0065 0.0219 0.5191 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0065 [6.33] 0.0011 0.0021 0.0660 77 0.0144 0.0219 0.5410 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0144 [6.50] 0.0015 0.0036 0.0685 131 0.0247 0.0218 0.5628 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0247 III _ [6.67] 0.0018 0.0054 0.1104 197 0.0370 0.0219 0.5847 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0370 [6.83] 0.0031 0.0086 0.1903 311 0.0555 0.0306 0.6153 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0555 (7.00] 0.0038 0.0124 0.2306 449 0.0809 0.0306 0.6458 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0809 [7.17] 0.0045 0.0168 0.2694 611 0.1087 0.0306 0.6764 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1087 [7.33] 0.0070 0.0238 0.4240 865 0.1477 0.0414 0.7178 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1477 (7.50] 0.0081 0.0319 0.4893 1159 0.1983 0.0414 0.7592 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1983 [7.67] 0.0181 0.0500 1.0921 1814 0.2954 0.0782 0.8374 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2954 (7.83] 0.0355 0.0855 2.1466 3102 0.5125 0.1242 0.9616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5125 [8.00] 0.0206 0.1061 1.2457 3850 0.7065 0.0621 1.0237 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7065 [8.17] 0.0147 0.1208 0.8894 4383 0.7657 0.0414 1.0651 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7657 [8.33] 0.0114 0.1322 0.6913 4798 0.7697 0.0308 1.0960 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7697 (8.50] 0.0118 0.1440 0.7154 5227 0.7589 0.0308 1.1268 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7589 [8.67] 0.0122 0.1562 0.7387 5671 0.7536 0.0308 1.1576 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7536 [8.83] 0.0082 0.1644 0.4975 5969 0.7314 0.0202 1.1778 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7314 [9.00] 0.0084 0.1728 0.5071 6273 0.6939 0.0202 1.1981 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6939 I [9.17] 0.0085 0.1814 0.5165 6583 0.6640 0.0202 1.2183 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6640 [9.33] 0.0087 0.1900 0.5257 6899 0.6406 0.0202 1.2386 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6406 i_ III- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal = 0.7697 cis 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in 1 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Or R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) )cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [9.50] 0.0088 0.1989 0.5347 7219 0.6225 0.0202 1.2588 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6225 I (9.67] 0.0090 0.2079 0.5435 7545 0.6088 0.0202 1.2790 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6088 [9.83] 0.0091 0.2170 0.5522 7877 0.5988 0.0202 1.2993 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5988 [10.00] 0.0093 0.2263 0.5607 8213 0.5919 0.0202 1.3195 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5919 [10.17] 0.0094 0.2357 0.5691 8555 0.5875 0.0202 1.3398 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5875 [10.33] 0.0095 0.2452 0.5773 8901 0.5851 0.0202 1.3600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5851 I [10.50] 0.0097 0.2549 0.5853 9252 0.5845 0.0202 1.3802 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5845 [10.67] 0.0098 0.2647 0.5932 9608 0.5853 0.0202 1.4005 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5853 [10.83] 0.0081 0.2728 0.4911 9903 0.5782 0.0166 1.4170 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5782 [11.00] 0.0082 0.2810 0.4962 10201 0.5644 0.0166 1.4336 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5644 [11.17] 0.0083 0.2893 0.5013 10501 0.5536 0.0166 1.4502 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5536 I [11.33] 0.0084 0.2977 0.5062 10805 0.5454 0.0166 1.4667 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5454 [11.50] 0.0084 0.3061 0.5111 11112 0.5394 0.0166 1.4833 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5394 [11.67] 0.0085 0.3146 0.5159 11421 0.5352 0.0166 1.4998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5352 [11.83] 0.0086 0.3232 0.5207 11734 0.5324 0.0166 1.5164 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5324 I [12.00] 0.0087 0.3319 0.5254 12049 0.5309 0.0166 1.5330 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5309 [12.17] 0.0088 0.3407 0.5300 12367 0.5303 0.0166 1.5495 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5303 [12.33] 0.0088 0.3495 0.5345 12688 0.5306 0.0166 1.5661 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5306 [12.50] 0.0089 0.3584 0.5390 13011 0.5316 0.0166 1.5826 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5316 (12.67] 0.0090 0.3674 0.5434 13337 0.5332 0.0166 1.5992 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5332 I [12.83] 0.0072 0.3746 0.4333 13597 0.5258 0.0131 1.6123 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5258 [13.00] 0.0072 0.3818 0.4360 13859 0.5109 0.0131 1.6254 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5109 [13.17] 0.0073 0.3890 0.4386 14122 0.4988 0.0131 1.6385 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4988 (13.33] 0.0073 0.3963 0.4413 14386 0.4892 0.0131 1.6516 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4892 [13.50] 0.0073 0.4037 0.4439 14653 0.4815 0.0131 1.6647 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4815 I (13.67) 0.0074 0.4110 0.4464 14921 0.4756 0.0131 1.6779 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4756 [13.83] 0.0074 0.4185 0.4490 15190 0.4710 0.0131 1.6910 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4710 [14.00) 0.0075 0.4259 0.4515 15461 0.4676 0.0131 1.7041 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4676 [14.17] 0.0075 0.4334 0.4540 15733 0.4652 0.0131 1.7172 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4652 [14.33] 0.0075 0.4410 0.4565 16007 0.4635 0.0131 1.7303 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4635 I [14.50] 0.0076 0.4486 0.4589 16283 0.4626 0.0131 1.7434 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4626 [14.67] 0.0076 0.4562 0.4613 16559 0.4622 0.0131 1.7565 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4622 [14.83] 0.0067 0.4629 0.4066 16803 0.4576 0.0115 1.7680 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4576 [15.00] 0.0068 0.4697 0.4085 17048 0.4494 0.0115 1.7795 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4494 [15.17] 0.0068 0.4764 0.4103 17295 0.4428 0.0115 1.7910 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4428 [15.33] 0.0068 0.4832 0.4120 17542 0.4376 0.0115 1.8025 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4376 [15.50] 0.0068 0.4901 0.4138 17790 0.4336 0.0115 1.8140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4336 [15.67] 0.0069 0.4970 0.4156 18039 0.4305 0.0115 1.8255 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4305 [15.83] 0.0069 0.5039 0.4173 18290 0.4282 0.0115 1.8370 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4282 [16.00] 0.0069 0.5108 0.4190 18541 0.4265 0.0115 1.8485 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4265 [16.17] 0.0070 0.5177 0.4207 18794 0.4254 0.0115 1.8600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4254 [16.33] 0.0070 0.5247 0.4224 19047 0.4248 0.0115 1.8715 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4248 [16.50) 0.0070 0.5317 0.4241 19302 0.4245 0.0115 1.8830 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4245 [16.67] 0.0070 0.5388 0.4257 19557 0.4246 0.0115 1.8945 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4246 (16.83] 0.0061 0.5448 0.3674 19777 0.4200 0.0099 1.9044 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4200 I [17.00] 0.0057 0.5505 0.3429 19983 0.4094 0.0092 1.9136 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4094 [17.17] 0.0057 0.5562 0.3439 20190 0.3986 0.0092 1.9228 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3986 [17.33] 0.0057 0.5619 0.3450 20397 0.3897 0.0092 1.9320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3897 [17.50] 0.0057 0.5676 0.3460 20604 0.3824 0.0092 1.9412 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3824 [17.67] 0.0057 0.5733 0.3470 20812 0.3765 0.0092 1.9504 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3765 I [17.83] 0.0058 0.5791 0.3480 21021 0.3718 0.0092 1.9596 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3718 [18.00] 0.0058 0.5849 0.3490 21230 0.3680 0.0092 1.9688 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3680 [18.17] 0.0058 0.5906 0.3500 21440 0.3649 0.0092 1.9780 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3649 [18.33] 0.0058 0.5964 0.3510 21651 0.3626 0.0092 1.9872 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3626 [18.50] 0.0058 0.6023 0.3519 21862 0.3607 0.0092 1.9964 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3607 I [18.67] 0.0058 0.6081 0.3529 22074 0.3594 0.0092 2.0056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3594 [18.83] 0.0058 0.6139 0.3539 22286 0.3584 0.0092 2.0148 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3584 I I 1 1 1 1 '- '_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.7697 cis 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sq ft Impervious Area - 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S - 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [19.00] 0.0059 0.6198 0.3548 22499 0.3577 0.0092 2.0240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3577 I [19.17] 0.0059 0.6257 0.3558 22713 0.3573 0.0092 2.0332 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3573 [19.33] 0.0059 0.6316 0.3567 22927 0.3572 0.0092 2.0424 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3572 [19.50] 0.0059 0.6375 0.3577 23141 0.3572 0.0092 2.0516 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3572 [19.67] 0.0059 0.6434 0.3586 23356 0.3573 0.0092 2.0608 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3573 I [19.83] 0.0059 0.6494 0.3595 23572 0.3576 0.0092 2.0700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3576 [20.00] 0.0060 0.6553 0.3604 23788 0.3580 0.0092 2.0792 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3580 [20.17] 0.0060 0.6613 0.3613 24005 0.3585 0.0092 2.0884 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3585 [20.33] 0.0060 0.6673 0.3622 24223 0.3590 0.0092 2.0976 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3590 [20.50] 0.0060 0.6733 0.3631 24440 0.3596 0.0092 2.1068 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3596 I [20.67] 0.0060 0.6793 0.3640 24659 0.3603 0.0092 2.1160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3603 [20.83] 0.0060 0.6853 0.3649 24878 0.3610 0.0092 2.1252 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3610 [21.00] 0.0060 0.6914 0.3658 25097 0.3617 0.0092 2.1344 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3617 [21.17] 0.0061 0.6974 0.3667 25317 0.3624 0.0092 2.1436 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3624 [21.33] 0.0061 0.7035 0.3675 25538 0.3632 0.0092 2.1528 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3632 I [21..50] 0.0061 0.7096 0.3684 25759 0.3640 0.0092 2.1620 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3640 [21.67] 0.0061 0.7157 0.3693 25980 0.3648 0.0092 2.1712 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3648 [21.83] 0.0061 0.7218 0.3701 26202 0.3656 0.0092 2.1804 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3656 [22.00] 0.0061 0.7280 0.3709 26425 0.3664 0.0092 2.1896 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3664 [22.17] 0.0061 0.7341 0.3718 26648 0.3672 0.0092 2.1988 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3672 I [22.33] 0.0062 0.7403 0.3726 26872 0.3680 0.0092 2.2080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3680 [22.50] 0.0062 0.7464 0.3734 27096 0.3688 0.0092 2.2172 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3688 [22.67] 0.0062 0.7526 0.3743 27320 0.3697 0.0092 2.2264 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3697 [22.83] 0.0062 0.7588 0.3751 27545 0.3705 0.0092 2.2356 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3705 [23.00] 0.0062 0.7650 0.3759 27771 0.3713 0.0092 2.2448 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3713 I [23.17] 0.0062 0.7713 0.3767 27997 0.3721 0.0092 2.2540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3721 [23.33] 0.0062 0.7775 0.3775 28223 0.3729 0.0092 2.2632 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3729 [23.50] 0.0063 0.7838 0.3783 28450 0.3738 0.0092 2.2724 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3738 [23.67] 0.0063 0.7900 0.3791 28678 0.3746 0.0092 2.2816 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3746 [23.83] 0.0063 0.7963 0.3799 28906 0.3754 0.0092 2.2908 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3754 I [24.00] 0.0063 0.8026 0.3806 29134 0.3762 0.0092 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3762 [24.17] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.3457 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3457 [24.33] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2890 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2890 [24.50] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2416 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2416 [24.67] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2020 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2020 I [24.83] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.1689 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1689 [25.00] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.1412 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1412 0.8026 48.5569 2.3000 0.0000 I I I 1. III. PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal = 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of.Basin I Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc 41 Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) I [0.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (0.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0128 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0256 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0384 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0512 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.83] 0.0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0640 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0768 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0896 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1024 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1152 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1280 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.2080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.2240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2432 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2624 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2816 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I (3.33) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3008 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3392 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.3616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.3840 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4064 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4288 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [9.501 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4512 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4736 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0004 0.0004 0.0235 14 0.0020 0.0262 0.4998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0020 I (5.00] 0.0010 0.0013 0.0577 49 0.0083 0.0262 0.5261 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0083 [5.17] 0.0015 0.0028 0.0907 103 0.0191 0.0262 0.5523 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0191 [5.33] 0.0020 0.0049 0.1227 177 0.0335 0.0262 0.5786 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0335 [5.50] 0.0025 0.0074 0.1537 269 0.0506 0.0262 0.6048 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0506 [5.67] 0.0030 0.0105 0.1837 379 0.0700 0.0262 0.6310 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0700 [5.83] 0.0041 0.0146 0.2491 529 0.0940 0.0304 0.6614 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0940 [6.00] 0.0047 0.0193 0.2868 701 0.1225 0.0304 0.6918 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1225 [6.17] 0.0053 0.0247 0.3231 895 0.1524 0.0304 0.7222 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1524 [6.33] 0.0059 0.0306 0.3581 1110 0.1833 0.0304 0.7526 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1833 (6.50] 0.0065 0.0370 0.3920 1345 0.2147 0.0304 0.7830 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2147 I [6.67] 0.0070 0.0441 0.4247 1600 0.2464 0.0304 0.8134 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2464 [6.83] 0.0107 0.0548 0.6475 1988 0.2939 0.0426 0.8560 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2939 [7.00] 0.0117 0.0664 0.7066 2412 0.3567 0.0426 0.8986 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3567 [7.17] 0.0126 0.0791 0.7630 2870 0.4187 0.0426 0.9411 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4187 [7.33] 0.018.5 0.0975 1.1181 3541 0.5043 0.0576 0.9987 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5043 I [7.50] 0.0200 0.1176 1.2110 4267 0.6125 0.0576 1.0563 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6125 [7.67] 0.0417 0.1593 2.5225 5781 0.8181 0.1088 1.1651 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8181 [7.83] 0.0756 0.2348 4.5712 8524 1.2654 0.1728 1.3379 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2654 [8.00] 0.0416 0.2764 2.5166 10034 1.6390 0.0864 1.4243 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6390 [8.17] 0.0290 0.3054 1.7552 11087 1.7204 0.0576 1.4819 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.7204 [8.33] 0.0222 0.3276 1.3447 11893 1.6925 0.0429 1.5248 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6925 [8.50] 0.0227 0.3504 1.3758 12719 1.6380 0.0429 1.5677 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6380 (8.67] 0.0232 0.3736 1.4058 13562 1.5975 0.0429 1.6106 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.5975 [8.83] 0.0155 0.3891 0.9390 14126 1.5278 0.0282 1.6387 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.5278 I [9.001 0.0157 0.4049 0.9511 14696 1.4323 0.0282 1.6669 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.4323 [9.17] 0.0159 0.4208 0.9630 15274 1.3544 0.0282 1.6950 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.3544 (9.33] 0.0161 0.4369 0.9746 15859 1.2911 0.0282 1.7232 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2911 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,_ IPROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q Ihrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [9.50] 0.0163 0.4532 0.9859 16450 1.2402 0.0282 1.7514 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2402 I [9.67] 0.0165 0.4697 0.9969 17049 1.1994 0.0282 1.7795 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1994 [9.83] 0.0167 0.4863 1.0077 17653 1.1671 0.0282 1.8077 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1671 [10.00] 0.0168 0.5031 1.0183 18264 1.1418 0.0282 1.8358 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1418 [10.17] 0.0170 0.5202 1.0286 18881 1.1224 0.0282 1.8640 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1224 I [10.33] 0.0172 0.5373 1.0387 19505 1.1079 0.0282 1.8922 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1079 [10.50] 0.0173 0.5547 1.0486 20134 1.0973 0.0282 1.9203 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0973 [10.67] 0.0175 0.5721 1.0582 20769 1.0901 0.0282 1.9485 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0901 [10.83] 0.0144 0.5866 0.8728 21292 1.0697 0.0230 1.9715 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0697 [11.00] 0.0145 0.6011 0.8790 21820 1.0380 0.0230 1.9946 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0380 [11.17] 0.0146 0.6157 0.8851 22351 1.0124 0.0230 2.0176 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0124 [11.33] 0.0147 0.6305 0.8911 22886 0.9920 0.0230 2.0406 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9920 [11.50] 0.0148 0.6453 0.8970 23424 0.9760 0.0230 2.0637 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9760 [11.67] 0.0149 0.6602 0.9028 23966 0.9635 0.0230 2.0867 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9635 [11.83] 0.0150 0.6752 0.9085 24511 0.9540 0.0230 2.1098 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9540 I [12.00] 0.0151 0.6903 0.9140 25059 0.9470 0.0230 2.1328 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9470 [12.17] 0.0152 0.7055 0.919.5 25611 0.9420 0.0230 2.1558 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9420 [12.33] 0.0153 0.7208 0.9249 26166 0.9388 0.0230 2.1789 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9388 [12.50] 0.0154 0.7362 0.9302 26724 0.9370 0.0230 2.2019 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9370 [12.67] 0.0155 0.7517 0.9354 27285 0.9363 0.0230 2.2250 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9363 I [12.83] 0.0123 0.7640 0.7442 27732 0.9205 0.0182 2.2432 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9205 [13.00] 0.0124 0.7763 0.7473 28180 0.8918 0.0182 2.2614 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8918 [13.17] 0.0124 0.7887 0.7505 28630 0.8684 0.0182 2.2797 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8684 [13.33] 0.0125 0.8012 0.7536 29082 0.8493 0.0182 2.2979 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8493 [13.50] 0.0125 0.8137 0.7566 29536 0.8339 0.0182 2.3162 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8339 I [13.67] 0.0126 0.8262 0.7596 29992 0.8214 0.0182 2.3344 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8214 [13.83] 0.0126 0.8388 0.7626 30450 0.8116 0.0182 2.3526 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8116 (14.00] 0.0127 0.8515 0.7655 30909 0.8038 0.0182 2.3709 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8038 [14.17] 0.0127 0.8642 0.7684 31370 0.7977 0.0182 2.3891 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7977 [14.33] 0.0127 0.8769 0.7712 31833 0.7932 0.0182 2.4074 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7932 I [14.50] 0.0128 0.8897 0.7741 32297 0.7898 0.0182 2.4256 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7898 [14.67] 0.0128 0.9026 0.7768 32763 0.7874 0.0182 2.4438 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7874 [19.83] 0.0113 0.9139 0.6837 33174 0.7781 0.0160 2.4598 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7781 [15.00] 0.0113 0.9252 0.6858 33585 0.7628 0.0160 2.4758 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7628 [15.17] 0.0114 0.9366 0.6879 33998 0.7503 0.0160 2.4918 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7503 I [15.33] 0.0114 0.9480 0.6899 34412 0.7403 0.0160 2.5078 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7403 [15.50] 0.0114 0.9594 0.6919 34827 0.7322 0.0160 2.5238 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7322 [15.67] 0.0115 0.9709 0.6939 35243 0.7257 0.0160 2.5398 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7257 [15.83] 0.0115 0.9824 0.6959 35661 0.7207 0.0160 2.5558 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7207 [16.00] 0.0115 0.9939 0.6979 36080 0.7168 0.0160 2.5718 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7168 [16.17] 0.0116 1.0055 0.6998 36499 0.7138 0.0160 2.5878 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7138 [16.33] 0.0116 1.0171 0.7017 36920 0.7117 0.0160 2.6038 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7117 [16.50] 0.0116 1.0287 0.7036 37343 0.7102 0.0160 2.6198 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7102 [16.67] 0.0117 1.0404 0.7055 37766 0.7093 0.0160 2.6358 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7093 I _ (16.83] 0.0101 1.0504 0.6082 38131 0.7007 0.0138 2.6496 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7007 [17.00] 0.0094 1.0598 0.5670 38471 0.6822 0.0128 2.6624 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6822 [17.17) 0.0094 1.0692 0.5682 38812 0.6634 0.0128 2.6752 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6634 [17.33] 0.0094 1.0786 0.5693 39154 0.6479 0.0128 2.6880 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6479 [17.50] 0.0094 1.0880 0.5705 39496 0.6351 0.0128 2.7008 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6351 [17.67] 0.0094 1.0975 0.5716 39839 0.6246 0.0128 2.7136 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6246 [17.83] 0.0095 1.1070 0.5727 40182 0.6160 0.0128 2.7264 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6160 [18.00] 0.0095 1.1164 0.5738 40527 0.6090 0.0128 2.7392 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6090 [18.171 0.0095 1.1259 0.5750 40872 0.6033 0.0128 2.7520 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6033 [18.331 0.0095 1.1355 0.5761 41217 0.5988 0.0128 2.7648 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5988 I [18.50] 0.0095 1.1450 0.5771 41564 0.5951 0.0128 2.7776 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5951 [18.67] 0.0096 1.1546 0.5782 41911 0.5923 0.0128 2.7904 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5923 [18.83] 0.0096 1.1641 0.5793 42258 0.5901 0.0128 2.8032 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5901 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Predevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak ■ Vtotal = 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sq ft Impervious Area ■ 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100 1 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs( (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [19.00) 0.0096 1.1737 0.5804 42606 0.5884 0.0128 2.8160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5884 I [19.17] 0.0096 1.1833 0.5814 42955 0.5872 0.0128 2.8288 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5872 [19.33] 0.0096 1.1930 0.5825 43305 0.5863 0.0128 2.8416 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5863 [19.50] 0.0096 1.2026 0.5835 43655 0.5858 0.0128 2.8544 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5858 [19.67] 0.0097 1.2123 0.5845 44006 0.5855 0.0128 2.8672 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5855 [19.83] 0.0097 1.2220 0.5856 44357 0.5854 0.0128 2.8800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5854 I [20.00] 0.0097 1.2316 0.5866 44709 0.5855 0.0128 2.8928 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5855 [20.17] 0.0097 1.2414 0.5876 45061 0.5858 0.0128 2.9056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5858 [20.33] 0.0097 1.2511 0.5886 45414 0.5861 0.0128 2.9184 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5861 [20.50] 0.0097 1.2608 0.5896 45768 0.5866 0.0128 2.9312 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5866 [20.67] 0.0098 1.2706 0.5905 46123 0.5872 0.0128 2.9440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5872 I [20.83] 0.0098 1.2804 0.5915 46477 0.5878 0.0128 2.9568 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5878 [21.00] 0.0098 1.2902 0.5925 46833 0.5885 0.0128 2.9696 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5885 [21.17] 0.0098 1.3000 0.5934 47189 0.5892 0.0128 2.9824 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5892 [21.33] 0.0098 1.3098 0.5944 47546 0.5900 0.0128 2.9952 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5900 I [21.50] 0.0098 1.3196 0.5953 47903 0.5908 0.0128 3.0080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5908 [21.67] 0.0099 1.3295 0.5963 48261 0.5916 0.0128 3.0208 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5916 [21.83] 0.0099 1.3394 0.5972 48619 0.5925 0.0128 3.0336 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5925 [22.00] 0.0099 1.3493 0.5981 48978 0.5933 0.0128 3.0464 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5933 [22.17] 0.0099 1.3592 0.5990 49337 0.5942 0.0128 3.0592 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5942 I [22.33] 0.0099 1.3691 0.5999 49697 0.5951 0.0128 3.0720 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5951 [22.50] 0.0099 1.3790 0.6008 50058 0.5959 0.0128 3.0848 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5959 [22.67] 0.0099 1.3889 0.6017 50419 0.5968 0.0128 3.0976 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5968 [22.83] 0.0100 1.3989 0.6026 50780 0.5977 0.0128 3.1104 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5977 [23.00] 0.0100 1.4089 0.6035 51142 0.5986 0.0128 3.1232 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5986 I [23.17] 0.0100 1.4189 0.6044 51505 0.5995 0.0128 3.1360 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5995 [23.33] 0.0100 1.4289 0.6052 51868 0.6003 0.0128 3.1488 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6003 [23.50] 0.0100 1.4389 0.6061 52232 0.6012 0.0128 3.1616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6012 [23.67] 0.0100 1.4489 0.6070 52596 0.6021 0.0128 3.1744 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6021 [23.83] 0.0100 1.4590 0.6078 52961 0.6030 0.0128 3.1872 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6030 I [24.00] 0.0101 1.4690 0.6086 53326 0.6038 0.0128 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6038 [24.17] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.5547 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5547 [29.33] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.4638 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4638 [24.50] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.3878 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3878 [24.67] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.3242 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3242 I [24.83] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.2710 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2710 [25.00] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.2266 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2266 1.4690 88.8766 3.2000 0.0000 I I I ' APPENDIX I ' Subsection 5 Post-development runoff calculations for the design storms. 1 II 1 '. III' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 2 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal = 0.2162 cfs 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sy ft Impervious Area 0 s ft 10.0000 Ac c Runoff Curve Number, Cn 0.0000 Ac 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 inn IRouting Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Time Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff R Rc Qi Vc Or R Rc (hrs) (in) (in) Qi Vc Qr Q (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) i [0.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.17) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0060 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0120 0.0000 [0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0180 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [0.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0300 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0360 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0420 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0480 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0060 0.0600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0675 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0750 0.0000 [2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0825 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0900 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.0975 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0075 0.1050 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1230 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [3.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1410 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1500 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0090 0.1590 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1695 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.1905 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [4.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2010 0.0000 (9.50) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2115 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0105 0.2220 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2343 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [5.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2466 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [5.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2589 0.0000 [5.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2712 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2835 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.67) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0123 0.2958 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0143 0.3101 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [6.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3243 0.0000 [6.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3386 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0143 0.3528 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [6.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3671 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [6.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0142 0.3813 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 O 0.0000 0.0000 [6.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 0.4013 0.0000 [7.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0199 0.4212 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [7.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 0.4412 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [7.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0270 0.4682 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [7.50] 0.0003 0.0003 0.0173 10 0.0014 0.0270 0.4952 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0014 O 0.0000 0.0133 [7.67] 0.0022 0.0024 0.1309 89 0.0133 0.0510 0.5462 0.0000 [7.83] 0.0075 0.0100 0.4552 362 0.0592 0.0810 0.6272 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0592 [8.00] 0.0055 0.0155 0.3338 562 0.1141 0.0405 0.6677 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1141 I [8.17] 0.0043 0.0198 0.2595 718 0.1441 0.0270 0.6947 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1441 [8.33] 0.0035 0.0233 0.2118 845 0.1591 0.0201 0.7148 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1591 0 0.0000 0.1690 [8.50] 0.0038 0.0270 0.2273 981 0.1690 0.0201 0.7349 0.0000 [8.67] 0.0040 0.0310 0.2424 1127 0.1798 0.0201 0.7550 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1798 [8.83] 0.0028 0.0338 0.1672 1227 0.1839 0.0132 0.7682 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1839 111 [9.00] 0.0029 0.0367 0.1735 1331 0.1817 0.0132 0.7814 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1817 [9.17) 0.0030 0.0396 0.1797 1439 0.1808 0.0132 0.7946 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1808 [9.33] 0.0031 0.0427 0.1858 1551 0.1811 0.0132 0.8078 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1811 I- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 2 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.2162 cis 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area = 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total t Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc (21 Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr 0 (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [9.50] 0.0032 0.0459 0.1918 1666 0.1824 0.0132 0.8210 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1824 [9.67] 0.0033 0.0492 0.1977 1784 0.1844 0.0132 0.8342 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1844 [9.83] 0.0034 0.0525 0.2035 1906 0.1871 0.0132 0.8474 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1871 [10.00] 0.0035 0.0560 0.2092 2032 0.1902 0.0132 0.8606 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1902 [10.17] 0.0036 0.0595 0.2149 2161 0.1938 0.0132 0.8738 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1938 [10.33] 0.0036 0.0632 0.2205 2293 0.1977 0.0132 0.8870 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1977 [10.50] 0.0037 0.0669 0.2260 2429 0.2019 0.0132 0.9002 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2019 [10.67] 0.0038 0.0707 0.2314 2567 0.2063 0.0132 0.9134 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2063 [10.83] 0.0032 0.0739 0.1933 2683 0.2073 0.0108 0.9242 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2073 [11.00] 0.0033 0.0772 0.1968 2802 0.2053 0.0108 0.9350 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2053 [11.17] 0.0033 0.0805 0.2003 2922 0.2042 0.0108 0.9458 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2042 [11.33] 0.0034 0.0839 0.2038 3044 0.2038 0.0108 0.9566 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2038 [11.50] 0.0034 0.0873 0.2072 3168 0.2041 0.0108 0.9674 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2041 [11.67] 0.0035 0.0908 0.2106 3295 0.2049 0.0108 0.9782 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2049 [11.83] 0.0035 0.0943 0.2139 3423 0.2061 0.0108 0.9890 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2061 I [12.00] 0.0036 0.0979 0.2172 3553 0.2076 0.0108 0.9998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2076 [12.17] 0.0036 0.1015 0.2205 3686 0.2095 0.0108 1.0106 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2095 [12.33] 0.0037 0.1052 0.2237 3820 0.2115 0.0108 1.0214 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2115 [12.50] 0.0038 0.1090 0.2269 3956 0.2138 0.0108 1.0322 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2138 [12.67] 0.0038 0.1128 0.2300 4094 0.2162 0.0108 1.0430 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2162 111 [12.83] 0.0030 0.1158 0.1843 4205 0.2147 0.0085 1.0515 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2147 [13.00] 0.0031 0.1189 0.1863 4316 0.2099 0.0086 1.0601 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2099 [13.17] 0.0031 0.1220 0.1882 4429 0.2062 0.0086 1.0686 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2062 [13.33] 0.0031 0.1252 0.1901 4543 0.2034 0.0086 1.0772 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2034 [13.50] 0.0032 0.1283 0.1920 4658 0.2014 0.0085 1.0857 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2014 [13.67] 0.0032 0.1315 0.1939 4775 0.2000 0.0086 1.0943 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2000 [13.83] 0.0032 0.1348 0.1957 4892 0.1991 0.0086 1.1028 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1991 [14.00] 0.0033 0.1380 0.1976 5011 0.1987 0.0086 1.1114 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1987 [14.17] 0.0033 0.1413 0.1994 5130 0.1987 0.0085 1.1199 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1987 [14.33] 0.0033 0.1447 0.2012 5251 0.1989 0.0086 1.1285 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1989 I [14.50] 0.0034 0.1480 0.2030 5373 0.1995 0.0086 1.1370 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1995 [14.67] 0.0034 0.1514 0.2048 5496 0.2002 0.0085 1.1456 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2002 [19.83) 0.0030 0.1544 0.1811 5604 0.1990 0.0075 1.1531 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1990 (15.00) 0.0030 0.1574 0.1824 5714 0.1962 0.0075 1.1606 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1962 [15.17] 0.0030 0.1604 0.1837 5824 0.1940 0.0075 1.1681 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1940 [15.33] 0.0031 0.1635 0.1851 5935 0.1924 0.0075 1.1756 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1924 [15.50] 0.0031 0.1666 0.1864 6047 0.1913 0.0075 1.1831 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1913 [15.67) 0.0031 0.1697 0.1877 6160 0.1906 0.0075 1.1906 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1906 [15.83] 0.0031 0.1728 0.1890 6273 0.1903 0.0075 1.1981 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1903 [16.00] 0.0031 0.1760 0.1903 6387 0.1902 0.0075 1.2056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1902 [16.17] 0.0032 0.1791 0.1916 6502 0.1903 0.0075 1.2131 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1903 [16.33) 0.0032 0.1823 0.1928 6618 0.1906 0.0075 1.2206 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1906 [16.50] 0.0032 0.1855 0.1941 6734 0.1911 0.0075 1.2281 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1911 (16.67] 0.0032 0.1887 0.1953 6851 0.1917 0.0075 1.2356 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1917 I - (16.83) 0.0028 0.1915 0.1690 6953 0.1901 0.0065 1.2420 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1901 [17.00] 0.0026 0.1941 0.1580 7048 0.1858 0.0060 1.2480 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1858 [17.17) 0.0026 0.1968 0.1588 7143 0.1813 0.0060 1.2540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1813 [17.33] 0.0026 0.1994 0.1596 7239 0.1777 0.0060 1.2600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1777 [17.50) 0.0027 0.2021 0.1604 7335 0.1748 0.0060 1.2660 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1748 I [17.67] 0.0027 0.2047 0.1611 7432 0.1725 0.0060 1.2720 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1725 [17.83] 0.0027 0.2074 0.1619 7529 0.1707 0.0060 1.2780 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1707 [18.00] 0.0027 0.2101 0.1627 7626 0.1693 0.0060 1.2840 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1693 [18.17] 0.0027 0.2128 0.1634 7724 0.1683 0.0060 1.2900 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1683 [18.33J 0.0027 0.2155 0.1642 7823 0.1675 0.0060 1.2960 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1675 I [18.50] 0.0027 0.2182 0.1649 7922 0.1670 0.0060 1.3020 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1670 [18.67] 0.0027 0.2210 0.1657 8021 0.1668 0.0060 1.3080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1668 [18.83] 0.0028 0.2237 0.1664 8121 0.1666 0.0060 1.3140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1666 1_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydroyraph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydroyraph Method I 2 yr storm (Al Qpeak = 0.2162 cfs Vtotal = 11213 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area i 435600 sq ft Impervious Area - 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc 41 Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [19.00] 0.0028 0.2265 0.1672 8221 0.1667 0.0060 1.3200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1667 [19.17] 0.0028 0.2293 0.1679 8322 0.1668 0.0060 1.3260 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1668 [19.33] 0.0028 0.2320 0.1686 8423 0.1670 0.0060 1.3320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1670 [19.50] 0.0028 0.2348 0.1694 8525 0.1674 0.0060 1.3380 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1674 [19.67] 0.0028 0.2377 0.1701 8627 0.1678 0.0060 1.3440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1678 [19.83] 0.0028 0.2405 0.1708 8729 0.1682 0.0060 1.3500 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1682 I [20.00] 0.0028 0.2433 0.1715 8832 0.1687 0.0060 1.3560 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1687 [20.17] 0.0028 0.2462 0.1722 8936 0.1692 0.0060 1.3620 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1692 [20.33] 0.0029 0.2490 0.1729 9039 0.1697 0.0060 1.3680 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1697 [20.50] 0.0029 0.2519 0.1736 9144 0.1703 0.0060 1.3740 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1703 [20.67] 0.0029 0.2548 0.1743 9248 0.1709 0.0060 1.3800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1709 I [20.83] 0.0029 0.2577 0.1750 9353 0.1715 0.0060 1.3860 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1715 [21.00] 0.0029 0.2606 0.1757 9459 0.1722 0.0060 1.3920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1722 [21.17] 0.0029 0.2635 0.1764 9564 0.1728 0.0060 1.3980 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1728 [21.33] 0.0029 0.2664 0.1771 9671 0.1734 0.0060 1.4040 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1734 I [21.50] 0.0029 0.2693 0.1777 9777 0.1741 0.0060 1.4100 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1741 [21.67] 0.0029 0.2723 0.1784 9884 0.1747 0.0060 1.4160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1747 [21.83] 0.0030 0.2753 0.1791 9992 0.1754 0.0060 1.4220 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1754 [22.00] 0.0030 0.2782 0.1798 10100 0.1761 0.0060 1.4280 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1761 [22.17) 0.0030 0.2812 0.1804 10208 0.1767 0.0060 1.4340 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1767 I [22.33] 0.0030 0.2842 0.1811 10317 0.1774 0.0060 1.4400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1774 [22.50] 0.0030 0.2872 0.1817 10426 0.1780 0.0060 1.4460 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1780 [22.67] 0.0030 0.2902 0.1824 10535 0.1787 0.0060 1.4520 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1787 [22.83] 0.0030 0.2932 0.1830 10645 0.1794 0.0060 1.4580 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1794 [23.00] 0.0030 0.2963 0.1837 10755 0.1800 0.0060 1.4640 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1800 I [23.17] 0.0030 0.2993 0.1843 10866 0.1807 0.0060 1.4700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1807 [23.33] 0.0031 0.3024 0.1850 10977 0.1813 0.0060 1.4760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1813 [23.50] 0.0031 0.3055 0.1856 11088 0.1820 0.0060 1.4820 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1820 [23.67] 0.0031 0.3085 0.1862 11200 0.1826 0.0060 1.4880 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1826 [23.83] 0.0031 0.3116 0.1869 11312 0.1833 0.0060 1.4940 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1833 I [24.00] 0.0031 0.3147 0.1875 11425 0.1839 0.0060 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1839 [24.17] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1691 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1691 (24.33] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1414 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1414 [24.50] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.1182 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1182 [24.67] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.0988 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0988 I [24.83] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.0826 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0826 [25.00] 0.0000 0.3147 0.0000 11425 0.0691 0.0000 1.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0691 0.3147 19.0408 max = 0.2162 1.5000 0.0000 max = 0.0000 0.2162 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_ III" PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak ■ Vtotal = 0.7697 cis 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area L 435600 sq ft Impervious Area ■ 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in 1 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) (0.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0092 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0184 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 (0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0276 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0368 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [0.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0460 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0552 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0644 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0736 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.503 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0828 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0092 0.0920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1035 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1150 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1265 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1380 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.149.5 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.1610 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.1748 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.1886 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2024 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [3.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2162 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2300 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0138 0.2438 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.63] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2599 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.2921 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [9.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3082 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [9.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3243 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0161 0.3404 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3593 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3781 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.3970 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4158 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4347 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [5.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0189 0.4536 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [5.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 1 0.0001 0.0218 0.4754 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0001 [6.00] 0.0003 0.0003 0.0191 12 0.0017 0.0218 0.4973 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0017 [6.17] 0.0007 0.0010 0.0429 38 0.0065 0.0219 0.5191 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0065 [6.33] 0.0011 0.0021 0.0660 77 0.0144 0.0219 0.5410 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0144 [6.50] 0.0015 0.0036 0.0885 131 0.0247 0.0218 0.5628 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0247 I [6.67] 0.0018 0.0054 0.1104 197 0.0370 0.0219 0.5847 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0370 [6.83] 0.0031 0.0086 0.1903 311 0.0555 0.0306 0.6153 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0555 [7.00] 0.0038 0.0124 0.2306 449 0.0809 0.0306 0.6458 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0809 [7.17] 0.0045 0.0168 0.2694 611 0.1087 0.0306 0.6764 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1087 [7.33] 0.0070 0.0238 0.4240 865 0.1477 0.0414 0.7178 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1477 I [7.50] 0.0081 0.0319 0.4893 1159 0.1983 0.0414 0.7592 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1983 [7.67] 0.0181 0.0500 1.0921 1814 0.2954 0.0782 0.8374 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2954 [7.83] 0.0355 0.0855 2.1466 3102 0.5125 0.1242 0.9616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5125 [8.00] 0.0206 0.1061 1.2457 3850 0.7065 0.0621 1.0237 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7065 [8.17] 0.0147 0.1208 0.8894 4383 0.7657 0.0414 1.0651 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7657 I [8.33] 0.0114 0.1322 0.6913 4798 0.7697 0.0308 1.0960 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7697 [8.50] 0.0118 0.1440 0.7154 5227 0.7589 0.0308 1.1268 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7589 [8.67) 0.0122 0.1562 0.7387 5671 0.7536 0.0308 1.1576 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7536 [8.83) 0.0082 0.1644 0.4975 5969 0.7314 0.0202 1.1778 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7314 [9.00] 0.0084 0.1728 0.5071 6273 0.6939 0.0202 1.1981 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6939 [9.17] 0.0085 0.1814 0.5165 6583 0.6640 0.0202 1.2183 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6640 [9.33] 0.0087 0.1900 0.5257 6899 0.6406 0.0202 1.2386 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6406 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- I_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offstte Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal = 0.7697 cis 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc - 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) fin) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [9.50] 0.0088 0.1989 0.5347 7219 0.6225 0.0202 1.2588 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6225 [9.67] 0.0090 0.2079 0.5435 7545 0.6088 0.0202 1.2790 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6088 [9.83] 0.0091 0.2170 0.5522 7877 0.5988 0.0202 1.2993 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5988 [10.00] 0.0093 0.2263 0.5607 8213 0.5919 0.0202 1.3195 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5919 [10.17] 0.0094 0.2357 0.5691 8555 0.5875 0.0202 1.3398 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5875 I [10.33] 0.0095 0.2452 0.5773 8901 0.5851 0.0202 1.3600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5851 [10.50] 0.0097 0.2549 0.5853 9252 0.5845 0.0202 1.3802 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5845 [10.67] 0.0098 0.2647 0.5932 9608 0.5853 0.0202 1.4005 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5853 [10.83] 0.0081 0.2728 0.4911 9903 0.5782 0.0166 1.4170 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5782 [11.00] 0.0082 0.2810 0.4962 10201 0.5644 0.0166 1.4336 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5644 I [11.17] 0.0083 0.2893 0.5013 10501 0.5536 0.0166 1.4502 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5536 [11.33] 0.0084 0.2977 0.5062 10805 0.5454 0.0166 1.4667 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5454 [11.50] 0.0084 0.3061 0.5111 11112 0.5394 0.0166 1.4833 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5394 [11.67] 0.0085 0.3146 0.5159 11421 0.5352 0.0166 1.4998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5352 [11.83] 0.0086 0.3232 0.5207 11734 0.5324 0.0166 1.5164 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5324 I [12.00] 0.0087 0.3319 0.5254 12049 0.5309 0.0166 1.5330 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5309 [12.17] 0.0088 0.3407 0.5300 12367 0.5303 0.0166 1.5495 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5303 [12.33] 0.0088 0.3495 0.5345 12688 0.5306 0.0166 1.5661 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5306 [12.50] 0.0089 0.3584 0.5390 13011 0.5316 0.0166 1.5826 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5316 [12.67] 0.0090 0.3674 0.5434 13337 0.5332 0.0166 1.5992 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5332 I [12.83] 0.0072 0.3746 0.4333 13597 0.5258 0.0131 1.6123 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5258 [13.00] 0.0072 0.3818 0.4360 13859 0.5109 0.0131 1.6254 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5109 [13.17] 0.0073 0.3890 0.4386 14122 0.4988 0.0131 1.6385 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4988 [13.33] 0.0073 0.3963 0.4413 14386 0.4892 0.0131 1.6516 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4892 [13.50] 0.0073 0.4037 0.4439 14653 0.4815 0.0131 1.6647 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4815 I [13.67] 0.0074 0.4110 0.4464 14921 0.4756 0.0131 1.6779 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4756 [13.83] 0.0074 0.4185 0.4490 15190 0.4710 0.0131 1.6910 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4710 [19.00] 0.0075 0.4259 0.4515 15461 0.4676 0.0131 1.7041 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4676 [14.17] 0.0075 0.4334 0.4540 15733 0.4652 0.0131 1.7172 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4652 [14.33] 0.0075 0.4410 0.4565 16007 0.4635 0.0131 1.7303 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4635 I [14.50] 0.0076 0.4486 0.4589 16283 0.4626 0.0131 1.7434 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4626 [14.67) 0.0076 0.4562 0.4613 16559 0.4622 0.0131 1.7565 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4622 [19.83] 0.0067 0.4629 0.4066 16803 0.4576 0.0115 1.7680 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4576 [15.00] 0.0068 0.4697 0.4085 • 17048 0.4494 0.0115 1.7795 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4494 [15.17] 0.0068 0.4764 0.4103 17295 0.4428 0.0115 1.7910 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4428 I [15.33] 0.0068 0.4832 0.4120 17542 0.4376 0.0115 1.8025 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4376 [15.50] 0.0068 0.4901 0.4138 17790 0.4336 0.0115 1.8140 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4336 [15.67] 0.0069 0.4970 0.4156 18039 0.4305 0.0115 1.8255 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4305 [15.83] 0.0069 0.5039 0.4173 18290 0.4282 0.0115 1.8370 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4282 [16.00] 0.0069 0.5108 0.4190 18541 0.4265 0.0115 1.8485 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4265 I _ [16.17] 0.0070 0.5177 0.4207 18794 0.4254 0.0115 1.8600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4254 [16.33] 0.0070 0.5247 0.4224 19047 0.4248 0.0115 1.8715 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4248 [16.50] 0.0070 0.5317 0.4241 19302 0.4245 0.0115 1.8830 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4245 [16.67) 0.0070 0.5388 0.4257 19557 0.4246 0.0115 1.8945 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4246 [16.83] 0.0061 0.5448 0.3674 19777 0.4200 0.0099 1.9044 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4200 [17.00] 0.0057 0.5505 0.3429 19983 0.4094 0.0092 1.9136 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4094 [17.17] 0.0057 0.5562 0.3439 20190 0.3986 0.0092 1.9228 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3986 [17.33] 0.0057 0.5619 0.3450 20397 0.3897 0.0092 1.9320 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3897 [17.50) 0.0057 0.5676 0.3460 20604 0.3824 0.0092 1.9412 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3824 I [17.67] 0.0057 0.5733 0.3470 20812 0.3765 0.0092 1.9504 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3765 [17.83] 0.0058 0.5791 0.3480 21021 0.3718 0.0092 1.9596 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3718 [18.00] 0.0058 0.5849 0.3490 21230 0.3680 0.0092 1.9688 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3680 [18.17] 0.0058 0.5906 0.3500 21440 0.3649 0.0092 1.9780 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3649 [18.33] 0.0058 0.5964 0.3510 21651 0.3626 0.0092 1.9872 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3626 I [18.50] 0.0058 0.6023 0.3519 21862 0.3607 0.0092 1.9964 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3607 [18.67] 0.0058 0.6081 0.3529 22074 0.3594 0.0092 2.0056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3594 [18.83] 0.0058 0.6139 0.3539 22286 0.3584 0.0092 2.0148 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3584 1_ III- PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 10 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal = 0.7697 cfs 28702 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc - 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S - 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.082O Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs( (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) )cfs) (in) (in) (cfs( (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [19.00] 0.0059 0.6198 0.3548 22499 0.3577 0.0092 2.0240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3577 I . [19.17] 0.0059 0.6257 0.3558 22713 0.3573 0.0092 2.0332 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3573 [19.33] 0.0059 0.6316 0.3567 22927 0.3572 0.0092 2.0424 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3572 [19.50] 0.0059 0.6375 0.3577 23141 0.3572 0.0092 2.0516 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3572 [19.67] 0.0059 0.6434 0.3586 23356 0.3573 0.0092 2.0608 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3573 [19.83] 0.0059 0.6494 0.3595 23572 0.3576 0.0092 2.0700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3576 I [20.00] 0.0060 0.6553 0.3604 23788 0.3580 0.0092 2.0792 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3580 [20.17] 0.0060 0.6613 0.3613 24005 0.3585 0.0092 2.0884 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3585 [20.33] 0.0060 0.6673 0.3622 24223 0.3590 0.0092 2.0976 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3590 [20.50] 0.0060 0.6733 0.3631 24440 0.3596 0.0092 2.1068 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3596 I (20.67] 0.0060 0.6793 0.3640 24659 0.3603 0.0092 2.1160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3603 [20.83] 0.0060 0.6853 0.3649 24878 0.3610 0.0092 2.1252 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3610 [21.00] 0.0060 0.6914 0.3658 25097 0.3617 0.0092 2.1344 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3617 [21.17] 0.0061 0.6974 0.3667 25317 0.3624 0.0092 2.1436 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3624 [21.33] 0.0061 0.7035 0.3675 25538 0.3632 0.0092 2.1528 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3632 I [21.50] 0.0061 0.7096 0.3684 25759 0.3640 0.0092 2.1620 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3640 [21.67) 0.0061 0.7157 0.3693 25980 0.3648 0.0092 2.1712 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3648 [21.83] 0.0061 0.7218 0.3701 26202 0.3656 0.0092 2.1804 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3656 (22.00] 0.0061 0.7280 0.3709 26425 0.3664 0.0092 2.1896 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3664 [22.17] 0.0061 0.7341 0.3718 26648 0.3672 0.0092 2.1988 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3672 [22.33] 0.0062 0.7403 0.3726 26872 0.3680 0.0092 2.2080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3680 ' [22.50] 0.0062 0.7464 0.3734 27096 0.3688 0.0092 2.2172 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3688 [22.67] 0.0062 0.7526 0.3743 27320 0.3697 0.0092 2.2264 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3697 [22.83] 0.0062 0.7588 0.3751 27545 0.3705 0.0092 2.2356 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3705 [23.00] 0.0062 0.7650 0.3759 27771 0.3713 0.0092 2.2448 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3713 I [23.17] 0.0062 0.7713 0.3767 27997 0.3721 0.0092 2.2540 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3721 [23.33] 0.0062 0.7775 0.3775 28223 0.3729 0.0092 2.2632 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3729 [23.50] 0.0063 0.7838 0.3783 28450 0.3738 0.0092 2.2724 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3738 [23.67] 0.0063 0.7900 0.3791 28678 0.3746 0.0092 2.2816 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3746 [23.83] 0.0063 0.7963 0.3799 28906 0.3754 0.0092 2.2908 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3754 I [24.00] 0.0063 0.8026 0.3806 29134 0.3762 0.0092 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3762 [29.17] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.3457 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3457 [24.33] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2890 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2890 [24.50] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2416 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2416 [24.67] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.2020 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2020 I [24.83] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.1689 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1689 [25.00] 0.0000 0.8026 0.0000 29134 0.1412 0.0000 2.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1412 0.8026 48.5569 max = 0.7697 2.3000 0.0000 max = 0.0000 0.7697 I I I I I 1_ III_ PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Off.site Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal = 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area 435600 sq ft Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc - 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Q1 Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [0.00) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.17) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0126 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0256 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0384 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [0.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0512 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [0.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0640 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0768 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.0896 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1024 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1152 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [1.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0128 0.1280 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [1.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.1920 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [2.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.2080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0160 0.2240 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [2.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2432 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2624 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.2816 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [3.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3008 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.50] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0192 0.3392 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [3.83] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.3616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.00] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.3840 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 I [4.17] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4064 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.33] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4288 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [9.50) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4512 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.67] 0.0000 0.0000 0.0005 0 0.0000 0.0224 0.4736 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 [4.83] 0.0004 0.0004 0.0235 14 0.0020 0.0262 0.4998 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0020 I [5.00] 0.0010 0.0013 0.0577 49 0.0083 0.0262 0.5261 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0083 [5.17] 0.0015 0.0028 0.0907 103 0.0191 0.0262 0.5523 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0191 [5.33] 0.0020 0.0049 0.1227 177 0.0335 0.0262 0.5786 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0335 [5.50] 0.0025 0.0074 0.1537 269 0.0506 0.0262 0.6048 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0506 [5.67] 0.0030 0.0105 0.1837 379 0.0700 0.0262 0.6310 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0700 [5.83] 0.0041 0.0146 0.2491 529 0.0940 0.0304 0.6614 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0940 [6.00] 0.0047 0.0193 0.2868 701 0.1225 0.0304 0.6918 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1225 [6.17] 0.0053 0.0247 0.3231 895 0.1524 0.0304 0.7222 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1524 [6.33] 0.0059 0.0306 0.3581 1110 0.1833 0.0304 0.7526 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1833 [6.50] 0.0065 0.0370 0.3920 1345 0.2147 0.0304 0.7830 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2147 ' [6.67] 0.0070 0.0441 0.4247 1600 0.2464 0.0304 0.8134 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2464 [6.83] 0.0107 0.0548 0.6475 1988 0.2939 0.0426 0.8560 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2939 [7.00] 0.0117 0.0664 0.7066 2412 0.3567 0.0426 0.8986 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3567 [7.17] 0.0126 0.0791 0.7630 2870 0.4187 0.0426 0.9411 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4187 [7.33] 0.0185 0.0975 1.1181 3541 0.5043 0.0576 0.9987 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5043 [7.50] 0.0200 0.1176 1.2110 4267 0.6125 0.0576 1.0563 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6125 [7.67] 0.0417 0.1593 2.5225 5781 0.8181 0.1088 1.1651 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8181 [7.83] 0.0756 0.2348 4.5712 8524 1.2654 0.1728 1.3379 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2654 [8.00] 0.0416 0.2764 2.5166 10034 1.6390 0.0864 1.4243 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6390 I [8.17] 0.0290 0.3054 1.7552 11087 1.7204 0.0576 1.4819 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.7204 [8.33] 0.0222 0.3276 1.3447 11893 1.6925 0.0429 1.5248 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6925 [8.50) 0.0227 0.3504 1.3758 12719 1.6380 0.0429 1.5677 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.6380 [8.67] 0.0232 0.3736 1.4058 13562 1.5975 0.0429 1.6106 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.5975 [8.83] 0.0155 0.3891 0.9390 14126 1.5278 0.0282 1.6387 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.5278 I [9.00] 0.0157 0.4049 0.9511 14696 1.4323 0.0282 1.6669 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.4323 (9.17] 0.0159 0.4208 0.9630 15274 1.3544 0.0282 1.6950 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.3544 [9.33] 0.0161 0.4369 0.9746 15859 1.2911 0.0282 1.7232 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2911 '_ ' PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offsite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak = Vtotal 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin Pervious Area 435600 sq It Impervious Area = 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in II Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Routing Coefficient, w = 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (Cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) (9.50] 0.0163 0(:).44:39 2 0.9859 16450 1.2402 0.0282 1.7514 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.2402 I [9.67] 0.0165 7 0.9969 17049 1.1994 0.0282 1.7795 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1994 [9.83] 0.0167 0.4863 1.0077 17653 1.1671 0.0282 1.8077 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1671 [10.00] 0.0168 0.5031 1.0183 16264 1.1418 0.0282 1.8358 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1418 [10.17] 0.0170 0.5202 1.0286 18881 1.1224 0.0282 1.8640 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1224 [10.33] 0.0172 0.5373 1.0387 19505 1.1079 0.0282 1.8922 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.1079 [10.50) 0.0173 0.5547 1.0486 20134 1.0973 0.0282 1.9203 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0973 [10.67] 0.0175 0.5721 1.0582 20769 1.0901 0.0282 1.9485 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0901 [10.83] 0.0144 0.5866 0.8728 21292 1.0697 0.0230 1.9715 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0697 [11.00] 0.0145 0.6011 0.8790 21820 1.0380 0.0230 1.9946 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0380 (11.17] 0.0146 0.6157 0.8851 22351 1.0124 0.0230 2.0176 0.0000 0 0.0000 1.0124 [11.33] 0.0147 0.6305 0.8911 22886 0.9920 0.0230 2.0406 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9920 [11.50] 0.0148 0.6453 0.8970 23424 0.9760 0.0230 2.0637 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9760 [11.67] 0.0149 0.6602 0.9028 23966 0.9635 0.0230 2.0867 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9635 [11.83] 0.0150 0.6752 0.9085 24511 0.9540 0.0230 2.1098 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9540 I [12.00] 0.0151 0.6903 0.9140 25059 0.9470 0.0230 2.1328 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9470 (12.17) 0.0152 0.7055 0.9195 25611 0.9420 0.0230 2.1558 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9420 [12.33] 0.0153 0.7208 0.9249 26166 0.9388 0.0230 2.1789 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9388 [12.50] 0.0154 0.7362 0.9302 26724 0.9370 0.0230 2.2019 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9370 [12.67] 0.0155 0.7517 0.9354 27285 0.9363 0.0230 2.2250 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9363 I [12.83] 0.0123 0.7640 0.7442 27732 0.9205 0.0182 2.2432 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.9205 [13.00] 0.0124 0.7763 0.7473 28180 0.8918 0.0182 2.2614 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8918 (13.17] 0.0124 0.7887 0.7505 28630 0.8684 0.0182 2.2797 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8684 [13.33] 0.0125 0.8012 0.7536 29082 0.8493 0.0182 2.2979 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8493 [13.50] 0.0125 0.8137 0.7566 29536 0.8339 0.0182 2.3162 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8339 I [13.67] 0.0126 0.8262 0.7596 29992 0.8214 0.0182 2.3344 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8214 [13.83] 0.0126 0.8388 0.7626 30450 0.8116 0.0182 2.3526 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8116 [14.00] 0.0127 0.8515 0.7655 30909 0.8038 0.0182 2.3709 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.8038 [14.17] 0.0127 0.8642 0.7684 31370 0.7977 0.0182 2.3891 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7977 (14.33] 0.0127 0.8769 0.7712 31833 0.7932 0.0182 2.4074 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7932 1 [14.50] 0.0128 0.8897 0.7741 32297 0.7898 0.0182 2.4256 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7898 (14.67] 0.0128 0.9026 0.7768 32763 0.7874 0.0182 2.4438 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7874 [14.83] 0.0113 0.9139 0.6837 33174 0.7781 0.0160 2.4598 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7781 [15.00] 0.0113 0.9252 0.6858 33585 0.7628 0.0160 2.4758 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7628 [15.17] 0.0114 0.9366 0.6879 33998 0.7503 0.0160 2.4918 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7503 [15.33] 0.0114 0.9480 0.6899 34412 0.7403 0.0160 2.5078 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7403 [15.50] 0.0114 0.9594 0.6919 34827 0.7322 0.0160 2.5238 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7322 [15.67] 0.0115 0.9709 0.6939 35243 0.7257 0.0160 2.5398 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7257 [15.83] 0.0115 0.9824 0.6959 35661 0.7207 0.0160 2.5558 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7207 [16.00] 0.0115 0.9939 0.6979 36080 0.7168 0.0160 2.5718 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7168 I [16.17] 0.0116 1.0055 0.6998 36499 0.7138 0.0160 2.5878 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7138 [16.33] 0.0116 1.0171 0.7017 36920 0.7117 0.0160 2.6038 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7117 [16.50] 0.0116 1.0287 0.7036 37343 0.7102 0.0160 2.6198 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7102 [16.67] 0.0117 1.0404 0.7055 37766 0.7093 0.0160 2.6358 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7093 [16.83] 0.0101 1.0504 0.6082 38131 0.7007 0.0138 2.6496 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.7007 I [17.00) 0.0094 1.0598 0.5670 38471 0.6822 0.0128 2.6624 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6822 [17.17] 0.0094 1.0692 0.5682 38812 0.6634 0.0128 2.6752 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6634 [17.33] 0.0094 1.0786 0.5693 39154 0.6479 0.0128 2.6880 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6479 [17.50] 0.0094 1.0880 0.5705 39496 0.6351 0.0128 2.7008 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6351 [17.67] 0.0094 1.0975 0.5716 39839 0.6246 0.0128 2.7136 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6246 [17.83] 0.0095 1.1070 0.5727 40182 0.6160 0.0128 2.7264 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6160 [18.00] 0.0095 1.1164 0.5738 40527 0.6090 0.0128 2.7392 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6090 (18.17) 0.0095 1.1259 0.5750 40872 0.6033 0.0128 2.7520 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6033 [18.33] 0.0095 1.1355 0.5761 41217 0.5988 0.0128 2.7648 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5988 (18.50] 0.0095 1.1450 0.5771 41564 0.5951 0.0128 2.7776 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5951 I [18.67] 0.0096 1.1546 0.5782 41911 0.5923 0.0128 2.7904 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5923 (18.83] 0.0096 1.1641 0.5793 42258 0.5901 0.0128 2.8032 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5901 III l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I, PROJECT: Greene Drainage, Offaite Basin Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method I 100 yr storm (A) Qpeak - Vtotal 1.7204 cfs 52633 cu ft Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin I Pervious Area - 435600 sq ft Impervious Area ■ 0 sq ft 10.0000 Ac 0.0000 Ac Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 81 Runoff Curve Number, Cn = 100.0 Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc = 56 min Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 2.3457 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S = 0.0000 in I Routing Coefficient, w - 0.0820 Cumulative Routing Coefficient, w - 0.0820 Cumulative Cumulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan- Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Total I Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q (hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (in) (in) (cfs) (cu ft) (cfs) (cfs) [19.00] 0.0096 1.1737 0.5804 42606 0.5884 0.0128 2.8160 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5884 [19.17] 0.0096 1.1833 0.5814 42955 0.5872 0.0128 2.8288 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5872 [19.33] 0.0096 1.1930 0.5825 43305 0.5863 0.0128 2.8416 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5863 [19.50] 0.0096 1.2026 0.5835 43655 0.5858 0.0128 2.8544 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5858 (19.67] 0.0097 1.2123 0.5845 44006 0.5855 0.0128 2.8672 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5855 [19.83] 0.0097 1.2220 0.5856 44357 0.5854 0.0128 2.8800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5854 [20.00] 0.0097 1.2316 0.5866 44709 0.5855 0.0128 2.8928 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5855 [20.17] 0.0097 1.2414 0.5876 45061 0.5858 0.0128 2.9056 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5858 [20.33] 0.0097 1.2511 0.5886 45414 0.5861 0.0128 2.9184 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5861 [20.50] 0.0097 1.2608 0.5896 45768 0.5866 0.0128 2.9312 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5866 I (20.67] 0.0098 1.2706 0.5905 46123 0.5872 0.0128 2.9440 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5872 [20.83] 0.0098 1.2804 0.5915 46477 0.5878 0.0128 2.9568 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5878 [21.00] 0.0098 1.2902 0.5925 46833 0.5885 0.0128 2.9696 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5885 [21.17] 0.0098 1.3000 0.5934 47189 0.5892 0.0128 2.9824 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5892 [21.33] 0.0098 1.3098 0.5944 47546 0.5900 0.0128 2.9952 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5900 I (21.50] 0.0098 1.3196 0.5953 47903 0.5908 0.0128 3.0080 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5908 [21.67] 0.0099 1.3295 0.5963 48261 0.5916 0.0128 3.0208 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5916 [21.83] 0.0099 1.3394 0.5972 48619 0.5925 0.0128 3.0336 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5925 [22.00] 0.0099 1.3493 0.5981 48978 0.5933 0.0128 3.0464 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5933 [22.17] 0.0099 1.3592 0.5990 49337 0.5942 0.0128 3.0592 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5942 I [22.33] 0.0099 1.3691 0.5999 49697 0.5951 0.0128 3.0720 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5951 [22.50] 0.0099 1.3790 0.6008 50058 0.5959 0.0128 3.0848 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5959 [22.67] 0.0099 1.3889 0.6017 50419 0.5968 0.0128 3.0976 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5968 [22.83] 0.0100 1.3989 0.6026 50780 0.5977 0.0128 3.1104 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5977 (23.00] 0.0100 1.4089 0.6035 51142 0.5986 0.0128 3.1232 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5986 I [23.17] 0.0100 1.4189 0.6044 51505 0.5995 0.0128 3.1360 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5995 [23.33] 0.0100 1.4289 0.6052 51868 0.6003 0.0128 3.1488 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6003 [23.50] 0.0100 1.4389 0.6061 52232 0.6012 0.0128 3.1616 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6012 (23.67] 0.0100 1.4489 0.6070 52596 0.6021 0.0128 3.1744 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6021 [23.83] 0.0100 1.4590 0.6078 52961 0.6030 0.0128 3.1872 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6030 I [24.00] 0.0101 1.4690 0.6086 53326 0.6038 0.0128 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.6038 [24.17] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.5547 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.5547 [24.33] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.4638 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.4638 [24.50] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.3878 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3878 [24.67] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.3242 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.3242 I [24.83] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.2710 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2710 [25.00] 0.0000 1.4690 0.0000 53326 0.2266 0.0000 3.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2266 1.4690 88.8766 max = 1.7204 3.2000 0.0000 max = 0.0000 1.7204 I I I I 1 • 1 I Page 1 of 1 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary F. [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:04 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Betty Greene Subject: GREENE Project-850 Tala Shore Drive Hi Michelle, I just received your letter dated October 28, 2005 and have a couple of questions regarding the additional information that you requested. • When I applied for the building permit, I provided Peter Bonyun with a Professionally Engineered "Drainage, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan". It was prepared by David Hanna of Northwestern Territories, Inc. dated 8/22/2005. This plan includes a tight line to the beach along with proposed sediment control devices. Please let me know if this document is incomplete in some manner. If by chance it has been misplaced, I can provide you with another copy. During a 1 July 2005 conference call with Stacie Hoskins,we discussed the requirement for a"grading component". It was my understanding from Stacie that a Grading Plan would not be required because we are proposing less than 500 cubic yards of earth moving activity. Our existing site plan includes grade elevations and I think you will see that the site is relatively flat, and will not require significant grading. Could you please confirm the requirement for a grading component? If a grading component is required, could you provide me with guidance on what specifically needs to be included in this plan. Finally what specifically needs to be revised on the site plan dated August 26, 2005? I believe the proposed tight line is already depicted on this plan. Back on 26 August 2003 I sent a letter to Shelly Ament at WDFW requesting preparation of an Eagle Management Plan. I guess she is back logged, but just last week she assured me that she will start working on our Plan. I hope to have it completed by early December. Please let me know what additional information is required. Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greeneauscg.mil 11/2/2005 I ID a Z 1 ? A i Z Lo 0 \ w W aN ik s n e n $ o N 0'II o: ce : e v < <n W L�l CD N Z () CO Ct ° , 6 i 1 ImmOm 0 \ I :i $ S i ry W 1 m i i i I I I Ioi;, �Q \ I $ i 1 I :I 1 m Z X\ d9 Irma . Vi i& U ,- ` d `' L. d; d_d d,�1E`. L_7 / - / Z ryry _=dm da°m d _ I 0 i °E d d d S Ig . u^ . vd'- n .. E do o Q % = v em�2 dm d cE �ao�oo°R"`oe v°d dd dd dm m LL a iO n a 2 2 1=2 1= 1105 7,i E K R o �v> \ \� �--°xgeg- 8 x 0 Y6 \�, N e W yd � \ ^ g-^ v F w �, i ,l O N 009111 0045W N OJ d In1L> 0 S y<on, C•400-1. w a a i N mm O Y M I.F C• n,y'n v g$� :22;28 s m U;M 8 Vt. 'l% / _ 1611[1 OVIIii (3t-N8Z-9l t/l MN) / O 88 1/1 rj s 1• so.2 •x x x Lid k z J 0 # ` Z I.i F < 1X0� W ; 18°11 ZzO m n °a< 4WD iff c7m a fzo w 311V<Wt<"< qt Y �� — �` ° y W Z - tdz 2 m O — 8 m F F z>. ~ U z M o °S 0 YV¢ i� oz W �'i c (6, 82,1W4 g z yl °gz°�16'aan z�� V1 UON <.U. F? G1qu N ':Z a su W Oi <OS W J O X E o.�vN.+2V 6 U J illiki■ _ , �Wza o • . 4.. I�f'l i'� �' �' 11111111111465235'! 02/06/200$ '1:211+ Jefferson County, WA OANY GREEN[ COY 21.N Jefferson County Department of Community Development Development Review Division 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 9$366 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantors: Gary F. G re efte stn d, t e by R. Greene, Grantee: Jefferson County Department of Community Development Jefferson County Health&Human Services ST THIS DECLARATION isnaae and entered this.,?f day of �On lies r-/ ,200.3,by Gary F.Grepa_ and t e R. Gee.ene ,hereinafter referred to as"Owner(s)," the legal and equitable owner(s)of the real property described herein. A.RECITALS 1. Legal Description:. This Restrictive Covenant shall affect and restrict the real property("the property")legally described as follows: Parcel Number.5 gall-51006 0.nd gal 1-5100.5 Section LS Township Z 13N Range 16 qrf S( 3iOn i NF V Subdivision Block Lot i% Bqy 2. Building Permit Application.The Owner(s)have applied or will apply for a building permit through the Jefferson County Department of Community Development("the County")and/or an on-site sewage permit through the Jefferson County Health&Human Services("Health Department")to make certain itiiprzvexu nt5 upon di:,abo'Y4K:cscribcd proY rty. • 3. Purpose. For purposes of complying with the County's building and land use codes and ordinances, as well as the Health District's minimum land area for issuance of an on-site sewage permit per WAC 246- 272,the Owner(s)desire to treat all of the above-described property as one building tract,and in particular, desires to dok so for the pqrpostpf constiructing a S,noje Fain NeSidfAce, utilizing all individual on-site sewage disposal system,as required by county code and/or state health regulations. Restrictive Comsat Pale 1 of 3 463235 Page; 2 of 9 Jefferson County, WA GARY GREENS COY 3120G0A11:4lA 4. Assurance to County. The Owner(s)desire to assure the County that the property described above shall be and remain as one building tract for purposes of improvements to be constructed upon the property; NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits derived by this Restrictive Covenant,the Owner(s)declare,covenant and agree as follows: B. COVENANT 1. Specific Restriction and Covenant. The property,described above,shall constitute a single building site,and no lot or lots or any part thereof shall be transferred or conveyed in any manner unless and until the building(s),structure(s)or on-site sewage disposal provisions are made to conform to the then-existing zoning provisions on a reduced site. This restrictive covenant shall not be removed unless such an action is approved by the County and the Health Department. 2. Covenant Running with the Land. This restrictive covenant affects and restricts the described property and shall be construed as a covenant running with and touching and concerning the land and inuring to the benefit of the Owner(s),the public generally,and the County. 3. Binding upon Successors and Assigns.This restrictive covenant shall bind and restrict the land,the Owner(s),their heirs,grantees,successors and assigns. 4. Recording. Upon its execution,this Declaration shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. All contracts and deeds or other instruments of conveyance relating to the property or any part thereof shall contain reference to this covenant. 5. Enforcement. In addition to any other party having a legal right to enforce this covenant,the County shall have the right to enforce and compel compliance with this covenant, including all remedies available at law and equity. The County shall have the right in any such proceeding to recover its attorney fees and costs. 6. Compliance with Code Requirements. This Declaration does not amend or modify,nor is it intended to amend or modify any requirements of the County's ordinances or any other law or regulation dealing with or affecting the use of land or construction of improvements upon lands. 7. Estoppel.The Owners by this Declaration specifically estop themselves and all of their successors and assigns and all persons presently or hereafter having any interest in the property from asserting or contending in any manner that this restrictive covenant is not a full and adequate covenant running with the land and binding upon the property. S. Severance. Invalidation of this covenant by judgment or court order shall not affect any of the other covenants which shall remain in full force and effect. Resaicdve Covenant Page 2 of 2 ... 111111111111111111111111 465235 Pas: aera Jefferson Counts, WA GARY GREENE COV '/21.0G11.2GA 9. Warranty of Authority. The Owner(s)signing below warrant that they are the sole Owners in fee of the real property described above and are authorized to make this Declaration and so bind the property. 10. Governing Law. This RESTRICTIVE COVENANT shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 11. Disclaimer. Since no survey was submitted as part of your Restrictive Covenant,the County accepts no liability for what facts a survey might have revealed. A survey might have revealed that a structure or improvement believed to be on the grantor's property is, in fact,located wholly or partially upon someone else's property or upon property that is not the subject of this application. But,in the absence of a survey, the GRANTOR bears sole responsibility if such a problem arises. t'r" Dated this a l day of Zcli UGer y ,20 a 3. 0 iAI f Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) On this day personally appeared before me, (9/my yr- B67714. &,-Erato to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal ' A/4rday of .�,/.d)../A t2/ ,2 a 03 y;"'' `''v NO RI:PUBi,IC 'n and for the tate f Washington residing '.) toss, _ -S+ at t'l 4 %4OrAkr*� jp My commission expires: S i9 o go N O.•444 w 1 • A t/i %.t'" r: si i • „iver, Appr' : UDC Administrator its Date Raatrictivr Ceramist Poet 3 of 3 MLA05-00526 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Review Type:I Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD05-00570 Received Date: 8/31/2005 SITE ADDRESS: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: GARY F GREENE PHONE: BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 821151005 Section: 15 Township: 28 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: PHONE: PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOD FOOT BRIDGE TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 15,000.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: UH CODE EDITION: 2003 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: DECK: SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: Prop: Total: Total: Routing Date: r 6-1 fuc- r c-` Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $251.25 SLE 08/31/05 76608 Plan Check $163.31 SLE 08/31/05 76608 State Building Code $4.50 SLE 08/31/05 76608 Total: $419.06 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION R LeA0 5-526 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD05-00558 Received Date: 8/29/2005 SITE ADDRESS: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: GARY F GREENE PHONE: BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 821151005 Section: 15 Township: 28 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: PHONE: PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOF DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 80,000.00 ADD'L: 800 HEAT TYPE: PRO CODE EDITION: 2003 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GDECRAKGE. 880 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: PWELL BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: 0 Exist: 0 Prop: 1 Prop: 1 Total: 1 Total: 1 Routing Date: F(77 Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date State Building Code $4.50 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Plan Check $554.94 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Permit $853.75 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Total: $1,413.19 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION M Review 00pe526 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 • PERMIT#: BLD05-00557 Received Date: 8/29/2005 SITE ADDRESS: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: GARY F GREENE PHONE: BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 821151005 Section: 15 Township: 28 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: PHONE: PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOi' NSFR TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,935 VALUATION 370,000.00 ADD'L: 1,072 HEAT TYPE: EEE CODE EDITION: 2003 HEAT BASE: 0 HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: CONST TYPE: 5N OTHER: 100 SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE. 340 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: PWELL BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: 0 Exist: 0 Prop: 2 Prop: 2 Total: 2 Total: 2 6-,i 0 j outing Date: x. Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Potable Water Application $53.00 SLE 08/26/05 76446 State Building Code $4.50 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Plan Check $1,628.74 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Permit $2,505.75 SLE 08/26/05 76446 Total: $4,191.99 Gary Greene 2442 NW Market St,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-794-2794 August 30,2005 Ms.Shelly Ament Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road Montesano,WA 98563 Dear Ms.Ament: Please find attached a copy of our Building Permit Application and Site Plan for our property on Tala Point near Port Ludlow, WA. As we have discussed on the phone and during your site visit in 2002, there is apparently an eagle nest within 400 feet of our property, and therefore a site specific Bald Eagle Management Plan will be required prior to construction. As depicted on the Site Plan, only one conifer tree with a diameter greater than or equal to 24 inches will have to be removed (Tree#23 on the Site Plan). There are several other conifers with diameters in excess of 24" located along the bank in the northeast corner of the property and along the center of the property. Although not depicted on the site plan, there are also several conifers with diameters in excess of 24 inches located within.the southern third of the property. The proposed driveway and septic have been located to avoid all conifers,with the exception of a 10"Hemlock(tree#8) We anticipate construction of the garage, driveway, and septic system to commence during Spring/Summer 2006. The primary residence will be constructed at a latter date. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need additional information or if you require my participation in a site visit. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or at GFGreene @bbxmail.net. Sincerely, / Gary F.GreeThe Copy:Jefferson County Department of Community Development (Wlo e tiOVre5) 1 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ML 526 Revv iew iew T Ty ype: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD05-00594 Received Date: 9/14/2005 SITE ADDRESS: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: GARY F GREENE PHONE:206-794-2794 BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 821151005 Section: 15 Township: 28 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: PHONE: PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOP ROCK RETAINING WALL TYPE OF WORK NON SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 8,000.00 ADM.: HEAT TYPE: CODE EDITION: 2003 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: CONST TYPE: OTHER SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: SETBACK: DECK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: Prop: Total: Total: outing /Date:9/ /i / s t / C..J Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Plan Check $99.61 SLE 09/13/05 76574 Permit $153.25 SLE 09/13/05 76574 State Building Code $4.50 SLE 09/13/05 76574 Total: $257.36 Map Output Page 1 of 3 821151005/006 8Z c}.,]:1,__.•x Cat x.oc. .,_a.3 IS http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 1 r ,' 821151009 — L I t 'II A 1 f y 4_.-- ., / 821151008 r 521151002 {' / 821151007 Legend Selected Features Road Sys1em 52" q«. Parcels-tl Wellshbnde 821151005 . too x ses. xtwwe 107 aid 237/ -Itr- �+ �82 1 1 0 1 004 ` S IPZ / r �' 9952110331 ' ru Z �f, Boundaries �re�� I .etrt rl':33.'V+' �30 f! n .v . f 998200329 r r li998200328 f vi pro„ a try „ccdlcas FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:55: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 f Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 r/ 821451(X79 / . f�i 831131008 / 11111 ,1V. jI 821151002 / r' f f/ / 821151007 % Legend Dselected Features Al Road System / 831151006 t� �r . n Par:ets-H Z ritical Aquifer Recharge 82,15t00S Areas �usc_vuter 821151004 n SARPA a S'uSC i / Li :AR�A 998200331 / I sARRA.J'IK 998200330 / Boundaries o0, -- I 'irJ ',,,, rr�. 1 f f/ }r A 41982(X)328 / Mims S7 exibd try.^tkr'ssai Carty C 1'n s....,i.'C Gis a 'b'tt FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:54: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 /, r / h71111111a. I' 821151000 S lb(7 821151006 /// ' illi - 821151002 / Legend / 821151007 Selected Features r' fff lt Road v System / / 1- Parcels-H f 821151006 Shore es-Arcs I I821 1 5 7 005 • C¢rxr'■aict=Wara / 5 PAB L7'I i 821151004 / lstsd i I • Ccnsayy / //1-- 9Ad200331 IJfJ ` uatrattesssl / / A/ an'''' / 008200330 / Boundaries /�} 3 c O {Ce Ctrremc i i , 008200328 .. ,. 1 , Maps wooded by Jed ersai Coney Car**S *c GS 0 I t31ft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:52: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 2 821151005/006 111. MIK. 41. 111M.j(41.',pry Legend Selected Features /vo# Road System ° 5'ate Parcets-H Streams • Type9 • Type 5 "Aif Typed fro, Type 3 g Type 2 ive Type 1 /4/ Oexx New Stream Types Al F.en 1a3z J-reoPe.e:t /6/ Fesn Haat*kloPeed 54" 4Aifr Nen naPt...v J.reedeed /04/7/ Nen irte1.4.T.r1 Macksoi Smret.-re S'Ate tirinchen Lake Types ?:±82C■022` 110 r 111 S III No Dm.9-.v.vcn LFA-Ftsb tblarbied Murretels Spotted Owls Pnonty Habitats and Species Boundaries •Qt3...p ...cre LUJ r.a • 0========= I I .oe,ssarl Ca-ref I FOR INFORMATIONAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- http://gisserver/servleticom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServieeName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 Legend Selected Features -_ f", Road System I PaK1Hk5-It Ftentage Points Boundaries _e'ramCoity - .1 vSter Otler Gurtca :1 tat:r.,4,1:r.. -.7-r c.:a t r. r. x FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:53 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 - -----------,,,,,A ,,..... N "� 1 A ' 1.11 4l.IP4, s1e1Y / Legend 0 Selected Features Road System ❑ Parcels-H al Sec Hazard Bourldanes ,:,.'4sscn Casty 821151004 I .Vmer - =,-/zr.,‘—/ / r1r I sI Corks / /1 / , !Fi 296200330 . 008200329 7 7 A00520028 — ..,..„ , Maasa*Kr.+ded by ae.erson Carty Cbrerat Sc erAes S .,>- �,�«N•'�*.1't. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:53: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 / 821151005/006 / 1 r' 821131004 rr \,._____________2C1- ' /' 821151008 821151002 / / 821151007 Legend / 0 Selected Features 821151006 !' ,/ Road System / _____.--ms /' f"� Parse is-H Landslide Hazard 821131003 >:a-. i i r + 821131004 tend_.srx / Eext. i /' / Boundaries f 1 / I 1`1asB' 44/11 / , 9918206.130 IV 99810:1320 A Maras S:v+ndadtry JegferS01,1 Caxg,Cava Sm-eres C'1r 0, `3"11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:54: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 ■ Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 , , , z i , r ' r ill / { ( I t / t / { 821151049 t //I'' Pt J L...rte^-c""v 45",- 1 ,--, '''' j/ i i / , f � r // / I f/ '.t'S 82115,00 j f 1 i l/70/0/////// 821151002 F 7 f i ` f i r r 821151007 / F , r r { Legend , 1, 1 , Selected Features i ' 821151008 ! f / r ' / � / Road System n Parce#s-F j~r, 821151005 l I i ''r i , f ! / / Contours / ( r ,i/ , l 5 `r 1i rf , !,.,.,,, ,0 Fat Cawr �/ SG root Car 821951004 , : Boundaries t t r'''',lr' 000331 r� `l�J2 JJ 1 I 1 Wan- ' • / j / i«z,c"Cartes y J`i ! fr/ l jr{ r/I //,/, , '1'r, r J t �� rf�rrt• )r F �., -"' 'F // , I \ / 5 200 49 ' r A 9 Ell(xb38 f J(' /I f// I Mptltiasi dsdby.1e�etsa,CarsnyCa'n'es& om%GS it ri 0 ' "11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:50: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 $ t 821151009 821151008 -1151002 / Ira t 821151007 f Legend DSelected Features altaM of Road System IParcets-H Paroei Tags-H ,22-*51006 H r / No Spac::t R -: 1 / ■ Spacaat Rcxc: o»/ems £51 rf Boundaries ,. fi{ F-7 _e.'c•wi Coon{ d/ / P 1,47,/, i'01-7, /r / r / I //fjJ ,,, 99820a329 ! ��, f 998200328 / /if! m Na prorxtad try Carty Ce ra So.x n G4S / 0 F 11. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Oct 28 10:51: 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:22 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Betty Greene; Nils Finne; 'Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil; Fred Slota Subject: RE: Valuation of project Michelle, The following is correspondence regarding your case, MLA05-00526. Stacie L. 3-toskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:11 AM To: Fred Slota Cc: Betty Greene; Nils Finne; Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: Valuation of project Fred, I'm working with my architect to validate our cost estimates. The Building Permit Block for"estimated Costs"states: "Fair Market Value of all labor and materials foundation to finish". This definition seems to exclude driveways, and other site prep expenses? I have a few specific questions as to what items are required to be included: 1. Cost of the Septic System? 2. Cost of the driveway? 3. Cost of the Storm water system? 4. Propane storage tanks? 5. Cost of rockery less than 4 ft high? Some of these relatively low walls verge on being"landscaping"rather than structural. 6. Free standing appliances (i.e. refrigerator?Washer/Dryer?) 7. Cost of built-in appliances? We will make every attempt to get these numbers validates before we depart Saturday for two weeks. While we are out-of-the country, we will most likely have periodic access to our personal Email accounts, but NOT our work email (the address from which I am sending this email). Our personal email addresses are: gforeene cr bbxmail.net and brgreene(abbxmail.net. Just out of curiosity,why aren't plan review costs based at least in part on square footage rather than estimated cost? So much of the cost of a house is driven by the level of finish (marble versus Formica; linoleum vs. tile; clear 9/26/2005 Page2of2 fir trim vs. painted; smooth dry wall vs. textured, etc, etc). I wouldn't think that the amount of time spent on plan review is related to the level of finish? Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene nuscg.mil From: fslota @co.jefferson.wa.us f mailto:fslota @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:07 AM To: Greene, Gary F. Cc: Peter Bonyun; Frank Benskin; Roseann Carroll Subject: Valuation of project Gary, After preliminary review of your project(plans)it appears that the construction costs will exceed the amount that has been proposed to the Jefferson County Building Division. Could you please provide cost estimates of your project? I have included Section 108.3 of the 2003 International Building Code: 108.3 Building permit valuations The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated permit value at time of application. Permit valuations shall include total value of work, including materials and labor,for which the permit is being issued, such as electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and permanent systems. If, in the opinion of the building official, the valuation is underestimated on the application, the permit shall be denied, unless the applicant can show detailed estimates to meet the approval of the building official. Final building permit valuation shall be set by the building official. If you should have any concerns or questions,feel free to contact this office. Regards, Fred Slota Building Official 9/26/2005 Page 1 of 3 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary F. [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:57 AM To: Stacie Hoskins; Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Betty Greene; Nils Finne Subject: GREENE Project-Tala Shores Good Morning, I wanted to confirm that you received the revised site plan drawings that were sent early last week. We have revised the elevations so that all of the rockeries are less than 4 feet. Does this eliminate the requirement to provide additional engineering details for the rockery? What are the next steps? Is there still a need for a face-to-face meeting? Also, I wanted to let you know that Betty and I will be out of the country for two weeks commencing September 26th. We will be back in Seattle on October 10th Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil From: Greene, Gary F. Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:54 AM To: 'Stacie Hoskins'; Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Betty Greene Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Peter, Fred and Michelle, I have completed the additional permit for the rockery, but I am waiting for a cost estimate from my Architect. I also understand that we will need to submit additional engineering details for the rockery, but that that can be submitted after the 11th?? I will fax the permit to you as soon as I have the cost figures. Hopefully latter this morning. Once you let me know the additional cost, I will mail a check and the original application. However not sure that the original will arrive prior to September 1 1th Will the faxed copy suffice until you receive the original?? Last week it was suggested that it would be beneficial if I came in to your office for a meeting. Not sure if this is still desired? However, I will be over at Bangor Naval Base on Friday for a morning meeting, and could continue on over to Port Townsend for an afternoon meeting. Please let me know if you would like me to stop by. I'm not exactly sure who should be my primary point of contact at the County?? Regards, Gary 9/26/2005 Page 2 of 3 Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greenee.uscg.mil From: Stacie Hoskins [mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM To: Peter Bonyun; Greene, Gary F. Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Gary, Michelle Farfan will be the project planner for your case. Her phone number is (360) 379-4457, and her email is mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us. She agreed to look at your application this week, and she will contact you if she has any questions. Regards, Stacie L. Hoskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:11 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, First things first. I want put your mind at ease regarding meeting your September 11 date for vesting. I spoke with Stacie Hoskins this morning and she assurred me that, provided that all of your permit applications were received by 9/11/05 that there would be no difficulty determining that you were substantially complete and vested before the deadline. Now, secondly, during the plans review process , which has begun,we have discovered that no permit application had been submitted for the rock walls. One of the notes on the plans specifically requires a separate permit for the rockeries. Also, for any rock wall with a top greater than 30"above the adjacent grade, a guard rail not less than 36"is required. Engineering is needed for any rock wall in excess of 48"above the footing or supporting any surcharge. You will also need to address the surcharge drainage for the rock walls. There may be additional information required, however, this can be deferred until after the application has been submitted. Please submit an application for the rock walls at your earliest convenience. 9/26/2005 • Page 3 of 3 Thanks, Gary. Regards, Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II 9/26/2005 Normal.dot Page 1 of 1 Michelle Farfan From: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:14 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: GFGreene @bbxmail.net Subject: 850 Tala Shore Drive -Greene Project Hi Michelle: We met with our architect, Nils Finne, last night and I want to let you know that he has re-designed the parking area/driveway so that we will not need the retaining walls previously indicated. New plans are being sent to you today, I believe. If the result of your review of the new design is that we will not need a rockery permit, could you let me know how we go about getting a refund of the permit fee already paid? Thank you, in advance, for your help. Betty R. Greene, COO Graham & Dunn PC 2801 Alaskan Way #300 Seattle, Washington 98121 206-340-9670 9/13/2005 Page 1 of 2 Michelle Fatfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary F. [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 12:04 PM To: Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Nils Finne; Betty Greene Subject: Additional Permit for Rockery-GREENE Project Hi Michelle, Last week we discovered that we needed a separate stand alone permit for the Rockery. I faxed the permit to Peter on Thursday. On Friday I mailed the original permit along with the permitting fees back to the county. Hopefully you will receive it today. My architect is working with an engineer to develop the required detailed rockery drawings. Hopefully I can get them in the mail to you sometime this week. On Saturday I did receive your letter advising us that our applications for the house, garage/adu, and bridge were "substantially complete". We greatly appreciate your expedited review of those documents. Please don't hesitate to call if you have any additional questions. Regards, Gary cell: 206-794-2794 Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greeneauscg.mil From: Stacie Hoskins [mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM To: Peter Bonyun; Greene, Gary F. Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Gary, Michelle Farfan will be the project planner for your case. Her phone number is (360) 379-4457, and her email is mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us. She agreed to look at your application this week, and she will contact you if she has any 9 Y PP y y Regards, Stacie L. 3-foskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 9/13/2005 Page 2 of 2 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:11 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, First things first. I want put your mind at ease regarding meeting your September 11 date for vesting. I spoke with Stacie Hoskins this morning and she assurred me that, provided that all of your permit applications were received by 9/11/05 that there would be no difficulty determining that you were substantially complete and vested before the deadline. Now, secondly, during the plans review process , which has begun,we have discovered that no permit application had been submitted for the rock walls. One of the notes on the plans specifically requires a separate permit for the rockeries. Also, for any rock wall with a top greater than 30" above the adjacent grade, a guard rail not less than 36" is required. Engineering is needed for any rock wall in excess of 48"above the footing or supporting any surcharge.You will also need to address the surcharge drainage for the rock walls. There may be additional information required, however, this can be deferred until after the application has been submitted. Please submit an application for the rock walls at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Gary. Regards, Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II 9/13/2005 gam. r e roo ert. . .11,, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 SEP 13 2005 ii, 360/379-4450 •• 360/379 4451 Fax www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment lopment �t0! y Master Permit Application MLA: 0 S — 5,2 6 Project Description(include separate iheets as nece sary): Cons-ktd- Rock MAUS otovnJ parkins of Parking / recc, wtd Garage Tax Parcel o Property Number: Q XI IS loo S and Dot 15'1006 Size: ya,, 8s 7 (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: g so r la. Score D t'i ve. i00 4 Lu d law t w4 Property Owner(s)of Record: ..r• 4" ,1, . • • a • t q1► L Telephone: a,IO6— 79 tf— oZ7 4 y Fax: ) email: VT 91'E?/� %� , • it i ne Mailing Address: .x 1/(1 /VW fMGt/`Mef�± tPhc6 4k/ tA4 IS'Io7 V Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies) Building ❑ Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑ Demolition Permit ❑ Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Single Family ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Modular ❑ Short Plat** ❑ Commercial* ❑ Binding Site Plan** ❑ Change of Use ❑ Long Plat** ❑ Address I Road Approach ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑ Propane ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑ Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑ Stormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑ Shoreline Management Variance ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Wireless Telecommunication* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium *May require a Pre—Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet I may result in this permit being null and void. 1 I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections.Access and right of entry to this property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. Si g natur e 4.1-3 `V+NA------ Date: q'D s The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-tra s rable responsib" a g to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this dislairrter and signs and dates it below. Signature: . QJ�1i �.Q.�/r�C/ Date: Ci ft 05 C:\Documents and Settings\mochil\Desktop\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc J r OWNER BUILDER STATEMENT _� i� The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel reference d herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibil11i of t e en Contractor for the proposed project. SEP Lvt15 Signature: M Q�'�1��' T � !I '� Date: 19/0 S GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX; _,_ MINI ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX: ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance installation permit,mark all items below that apply: Underground Tank Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: Number Heat Stove Cook Stove Woodstove Fireplace Insert i Hot Water Tank i Pellet Stove Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size, distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, includin• the reserve area. S.care FOOta.e � 'c. Only h i iI i 41 �. �� Iris ( t Current Proposed i� Psi s �� � �� � Ott ou �I �� ��(�i� Ire �� � � � � ,�� �= ray Main Floor , vi 1I) �I III Iii ¢ � � ii•i .III�i 1 �,� m _�III i £iii 41 i � i +AF (I,1, I Ilir I� III 11 I �a ,I s rllu .� ( �� � i II ��� i �j[ I 2Nu Floor f ,� r1 . v� �� III Ii11ri I �� � MII 11 at I��I of Id 11 I�i ��� (II III I'I) II��II IIIInIIi II 11 �• II 131 I � i �k1 h IYL z � 'h �},{ II 2, � � 3r. Floor ditr ' u G"11 li t ' 11 I cIi li i ill pi k. IIIiI i s� I u�ii I ai � SI `�. 11 Ni i III _ � 1111 �'. � �€ �* 1 111 r r I i i I � i 7 Mezzanine: " „ „ II IIN in. `m �� I�I 6IIr I� 'f IP �: ,III? !fl 1114:1-40 Sri �( T 7 i IIaU 1 Heated Basement '; 1 ���� ' I. 1�4u yI1II II Ok 0s II i �9 ?ir�r I�I� v 19 I €�� I I I G I I) Unheated Basement ,I 7 l (III of u ' `� I!li r " ,, tla `u(� iII Idil I I ii�� I�,II II ; i I�III ,g h� =V Il 1 III id l INli 3 Other Unheated , a III . �I- IIi1 = III � ��` III;II) 4 III (�_ ! I I I � I I I pp I _ I 14 ( I' P II F 1 I0i� h, r I� II IIr'� II III i, i Garage/Carport II _ „II 11 = h1 ,� r . w• o I I Decks q a1 � 17 1 i 0U 11 S,aC I r I . Other rm1� ashlCheck m r: i� i l� .I � I� II ;�II 0i �i e�II I ... ESTIMATED COST(REQ _ V ED) �' � ,' '., , •Fair market value of alllab• I �` 4 I ilt I) it and materials foundation to finish a i z i �i a 5 � ' ni a I t 1 ( . ,. Ir>;.�� I „� FI � I' i C:\Documents and Settings\ hil\ sktop\Master Permit Appli .:• 7-8-04.doc ' Michelle Farfan To: sea @cablespeed.com Subject: Greene habitat management plan (Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow) Hi Amy: Could you email me a copyof the habitat management plan that you prepared for the Greene parcel (APN 821151005/006). I am in the process of reviewing their building permits. Thanks. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mcarFan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 36O-379-4473 (fax) 1 ¢,sox o JEFFERSON COUNTY 4 , o �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti a � 621 Sheridan Street IINe Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 RE: SITE ADDRESS:850 TALA SHORE DR MLA#: MLA05-00526 ((mo rote, ,(4)1 ( Dear GARY F GREENE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, 11 Department of Community D -lopment Staff c: File Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 ¢g®N JEFFERSON COUNTY IDEPARTMENT OP O MUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.4 621 Sheridan Street �q �p Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 RE: SITE ADDRESS:850 TALA SHORE R �' r/ MLA#: MLA05-00526 (Fpu 1 Dear GARY F GREENE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, II Lill! vr,. .!„,,, Department of Community Devel ent Staff c: File Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 ¢Sow c JEFFERSON COUNTY 44 ) °�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street ��0 Port Townsend, WA 98368 INS Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 RE: SITE ADDRESS:850 TA SHORE DR MLA#: MLA05-00526 ,CS f5 Dear GARY F GREENE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, /Thi/C / 0 //i � - Department of Community Develott ent Staff c: File Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 ON) JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT rzi ti 621 Sheridan Street �� Port Townsend, WA 98368 �IN Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA05-00526 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or by September 23,2005. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary,the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact M FARFAN at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, M FARFAN c: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY � 9gSoN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT w irrAk ti coq 621 Sheridan Street o Port Townsend, WA 98368 kING Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA05-00526 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: FOOT BRIDGE Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or by September 23,2005. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary,the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact M FARFAN at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, M FARFAN c: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 gsoN �o JEFFERSON COUNTY �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti 4,:?. 04 4 o� 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director September 9, 2005 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA05-00526 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU Comments must be received within fourteen(14)calendar days or by September 23,2005. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary,the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact M FARFAN at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, M FARFAN c: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 g o § Z 6188 a ii N e° oZ . n . _ In W W 0 N Z (n I— C ct S ., u 00 6 . 1- w .0. ■t - 11 '1 giCl • � V) I a1 I Q 6 GPq 1 1 1 t / I wi I I I /9Is ti oG0 ■ g g 4IgI ; j I i ii.166 41$ U we � I I I�i aE a a a76 `� �'flE 2 Ra I moa g ' I 0 -z ny�d g K g'aE G' a (j) d a ,a- ,. E E ao d ++ ., _"Sm°gym ai °e r. "tcK cE e n e dd dg 2,d 02..2g 4. ,- § a Ada°- LU i-$a Wpm Jl i.0.4 'J'xui os* i 8o yw t i:10,- R gg N OOK i - i Y NVIII _ ■ V M nm ,L9 h N e yN 4I v m a U x 3� S o O e mg3On , II 4i / aui mmnc (3l-N9Z-9l 4/I MN) / O 88$ . i a hx- W —M '<5 8.vx11 ! =ff ak dive • YAW W — € .a . �.. ; ,A a �' „ hilt wE ' xv ' Ygm o — .eS $x.€ r t Y Y W 334€w 1—y n ! hUiH ki A., Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:36 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil'; Stacie Hoskins Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Betty Greene Subject: RE: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, Thanks for your response. Engineering for the rockery can certainly be a deferred submittal. The fax'd copy of your permit will be sufficient. As I said yesterday we will be determining completeness as of your date of original application. Fred Slota would still like to meet with you, however, he is not in the office on Fridays. We are presently in the middle of moving our offices. I expect that he will be in touch with you sometime after we have completed our move. I think that it is safe to say that Michelle will be your primary contact from this point on relative to any land use issues. Fred will be involved with the plans examination. Thanks, Gary Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:54 AM To: Stacie Hoskins; Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Betty Greene Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Peter, Fred and Michelle, I have completed the additional permit for the rockery, but I am waiting for a cost estimate from my Architect. I also understand that we will need to submit additional engineering details for the rockery, but that that can be submitted after the 11th?? I will fax the permit to you as soon as I have the cost figures. Hopefully latter this morning. Once you let me know the additional cost, I will mail a check and the original application. However not sure that the original will arrive prior to September 11th. Will the faxed copy suffice until you receive the original?? Last week it was suggested that it would be beneficial if I came in to your office for a meeting. Not sure if this is still desired? However, I will be over at Bangor Naval Base on Friday for a morning meeting, and could continue on over to Port Townsend for an afternoon meeting. Please let me know if you would like me to stop by. I'm not exactly sure who should be my primary point of contact at the County?? Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene( uscg.mil 9/9/2005 Page 2 of 2 From: Stacie Hoskins [mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM To: Peter Bonyun; Greene, Gary F. Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Gary, Michelle Farfan will be the project planner for your case. Her phone number is (360) 379-4457, and her email is mfarfan(aco.jefferson.wa.us. She agreed to look at your application this week, and she will contact you if she has any questions. Regards, Stacie L. 3-foskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:11 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, First things first. I want put your mind at ease regarding meeting your September 11 date for vesting. I spoke with Stacie Hoskins this morning and she assurred me that, provided that all of your permit applications were received by 9/11/05 that there would be no difficulty determining that you were substantially complete and vested before the deadline. Now, secondly, during the plans review process , which has begun, we have discovered that no permit application had been submitted for the rock walls. One of the notes on the plans specifically requires a separate permit for the rockeries. Also, for any rock wall with a top greater than 30"above the adjacent grade, a guard rail not less than 36" is required. Engineering is needed for any rock wall in excess of 48" above the footing or supporting any surcharge. You will also need to address the surcharge drainage for the rock walls. There may be additional information required, however, this can be deferred until after the application has been submitted. Please submit an application for the rock walls at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Gary. Regards, Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II 9/9/2005 Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary F. [Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:54 AM To: Stacie Hoskins; Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan; Betty Greene Subject: RE:Additional Permit Hi Peter, Fred and Michelle, I have completed the additional permit for the rockery, but I am waiting for a cost estimate from my Architect. I also understand that we will need to submit additional engineering details for the rockery, but that that can be submitted after the 11th?? I will fax the permit to you as soon as I have the cost figures. Hopefully latter this morning. Once you let me know the additional cost, I will mail a check and the original application. However not sure that the original will arrive prior to September 11th. Will the faxed copy suffice until you receive the original?? Last week it was suggested that it would be beneficial if I came in to your office for a meeting. Not sure if this is still desired? However, I will be over at Bangor Naval Base on Friday for a morning meeting, and could continue on over to Port Townsend for an afternoon meeting. Please let me know if you would like me to stop by. I'm not exactly sure who should be my primary point of contact at the County?? Regards, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greeneuscg.mil From: Stacie Hoskins [mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM To: Peter Bonyun; Greene, Gary F. Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Gary, Michelle Farfan will be the project planner for your case. Her phone number is (360) 379-4457, and her email is mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us. She agreed to look at your application this week, and she will contact you if she has any questions. Regards, Stacie L. 3-foskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 9/8/2005 Page 2 of 2 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins©co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:11 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, First things first. I want put your mind at ease regarding meeting your September 11 date for vesting. I spoke with Stacie Hoskins this morning and she assurred me that, provided that all of your permit applications were received by 9/11/05 that there would be no difficulty determining that you were substantially complete and vested before the deadline. Now, secondly, during the plans review process , which has begun,we have discovered that no permit application had been submitted for the rock walls. One of the notes on the plans specifically requires a separate permit for the rockeries. Also, for any rock wall with a top greater than 30"above the adjacent grade, a guard rail not less than 36" is required. Engineering is needed for any rock wall in excess of 48"above the footing or supporting any surcharge. You will also need to address the surcharge drainage for the rock walls. There may be additional information required, however, this can be deferred until after the application has been submitted. Please submit an application for the rock walls at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Gary. Regards, Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II 9/8/2005 Page 1 of 1 Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:42 AM To: Peter Bonyun; 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Additional Permit Hi Gary, Michelle Farfan will be the project planner for your case. Her phone number is (360) 379-4457, and her email is mfarfan@ co.jefferson.wa.us. She agreed to look at your application this week, and she will contact you if she has any questions. Regards, Stacie L. 3-foskins Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:11 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Stacie Hoskins Subject: Additional Permit Good morning Gary, First things first. I want put your mind at ease regarding meeting your September 11 date for vesting. I spoke with Stacie Hoskins this morning and she assurred me that, provided that all of your permit applications were received by 9/11/05 that there would be no difficulty determining that you were substantially complete and vested before the deadline. Now, secondly, during the plans review process , which has begun, we have discovered that no permit application had been submitted for the rock walls. One of the notes on the plans specifically requires a separate permit for the rockeries. Also, for any rock wall with a top greater than 30" above the adjacent grade, a guard rail not less than 36" is required. Engineering is needed for any rock wall in excess of 48"above the footing or supporting any surcharge. You will also need to address the surcharge drainage for the rock walls. There may be additional information required, however, this can be deferred until after the application has been submitted. Please submit an application for the rock walls at your earliest convenience. Thanks, Gary. Regards, Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II 9/7/2005 s/s� I F V try p ' N JEFFERSON COUNTY f i 1 + DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I *I. "`'1 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 I " 1 AUG 2 6 2005 't 1/ 4, , 360/379-4450 • 360/3794451 Fax ISZinsle www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment L__— t DEPT.0-1L, ,.,„.',ate'! 4:-P T' Master Permit Application Project Descriptioq(in lude separate sheets as necessa ): To/+- bed r oo" S'om k fair .1 y Res;d fn to v—IN de chj� claro.v. Once b4Jrour i ;dice.`, DO MINI 1/r 4- obese 9Cro,..Eie• Tax Parcel -+ Property Number: 311I5aOC.S GU1t7 gat IMO at Size: y�/, 5 7 . : quare fee 0 Site Address and/or Directions to Pro erty: g S 0 Tcu J - . (-:-.1 cy pr-+tie Park L(yd iv•:� (it/q Property Owner(s)of Record: ry CAA(1 R e -y G re ei1 e. `� Telephone:a0 -7C1�� ig� Fax:,2O 3 yC ] email: Cjrevne @1 hXc' u�� Mailing Address:;Ili`/;i ,VIN f1c rh€•+ S"f, �ItC S'Pcz`14l+ L JA 9I 1c7 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): .S(. e Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies) )(Bui)i Building ❑ Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) lding ❑ Demolition Permit ❑ Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or Cl** X Single Family ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification AL Garage Attached etached ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Modular ❑ Short Plat** ❑ Commercial* ❑ Binding Site Plan** ❑ Change of Use ❑ Long Plat** ❑ Address i Road Approach ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** Propane ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑ Al owed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** X Stormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑ Shoreline Management Variance ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Wireless Telecommunication* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium *May require a Pre—Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please idenft any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: I4PA/ 'TAR PA ,== 1 DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate f✓1/a to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspecttiions.Access and right of entry to this property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours.Signature: = tt _I_ Date: g/o13/0 c The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County.development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-tran f able responsibili for�d¢�ring to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer;and signs and dates it below. Signature:f �(.'V`�.- -r" / ,J r Date: W -11 /0 5 C:\Documents and Settings\mochit\Desktop\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc OWNER BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be as ming the responsibili of the General Contractor for the proposed pFe)est tT r Signature: Id V „�' ' 9 j Date: r • GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: { A I��ON FAX: ( ) ( ) i MAILING ADDRESS: I I From'. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE `iL -I, ��� NUMBER: D'_'}. �.r CC) o�R1Y Di VELO(��/iENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: t 11) PHONE ( Q6) 67-29 O FAX: (3� i )961'.2952 �i f1r� t �`�,�CPcI p f'uY `l y MAILING ADDRESS: i'7 poi, j 1} ��" FAR t7f aTP�c w� EMAIL /J'h L Fin^e coA1 r Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ,� New Wood Existing: 0 ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition Steel Proposed: (�l�t Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete ,j p y latal� .2 A e ght: Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry f� SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply:v. Existing: ,1 ® Setback: Private well Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: r' % .2 4 ❑ Public „,,�,r.,y_r�©{ Wyss F,.s� rotal: ” ..2. � 1.S4 Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: Underground Tank 1 Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: SOC, G / ppg� i Heat Stove Cook Stove i Woodstove )d Fireplace Insert X Hot Water Tank 1 Pellet Stove Other 138Q Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submi site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, includin• the reserve area. S.uare FOOta.e �i orO '< lait I ! �,' ' r��m�i ������ �' ��f � cif�il(���'� � i Current Pro osed �� ��i�i�, � Main Floor i, �' ,,,,,,w:911[111011 y Re eiJ '� �� . . a ) . ( t? �� i�yl '';- �Ii� 19 15 r �, 1 iii ���� ���� if' '''' r.' G Floor � � r ,r, � �i�, : - © r +n �i ; it 5' ;'� ( -;� ��� II4 1�� iI � 4 3' Floor /� �� H �dttional Yom,"� ���I _ 1��hh�� �l 15 e ,R i° �i (Iii, .r ��r�� a;P7� ,� r ��-""—.b r( (i I�I�I�,- i ipl) fit 1 � �90� r r➢ Mezzanine: i, lnb r a a''+w � z e a ��I'(I it ,, ' „� I1�i �� .�i s G; u y„ i i � II iiI I - Heated Basement to « r r�'li� it �� 'i �� -'r ii�i�i� .r d %'_ xI 4i ith� ��itd( i��� a a iii F i � .#� I IiiM i �ii i yw i:iii i- i'i i ii'.. Unheated Basement t ,❑ v- f �i iqi 'I �i r Other Unheat�e[d-AI:• F]Q44IQ "' 3'I A � " i�, ��, r�',u � '��i�i '�' �� �d� ' loll V�I © V �iil0 .t C . � I --s.le i'„, .. t is � i ��) !' Garage/Carport . '�t , ,'�'T T pit f ; ' G �. '1,1~1,1{, ri:Decks ��i 0.;.e. [� �"-; � fed m o� : i ih id �"���� ��i' �� ) ����"frtri - rlaliiii ��� ��i it7M it '�' ii t �_ 7�' i �mu4 i ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) °� .t �i;'" ��,� �, �! Fair market value of all labor and��- ai - n a ion • finish I •„ �� � ��I yy /� ��yy-.�� FN �ii7i L rq z� GI W)i16 }i� (566Si1 rl+_ (/./ �- 7V Ow l i''' i i h���, i (� ', 0 I � `^` .,i� €1111161 f lt�a Hll ��. (ii nor C:\Documents and Settings\mock l\Desktop\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc 0 Page 1 of 2 Peter Bonyun From: Peter Bonyun Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:56 PM To: 'Gary.F.Greene©uscg.mil' Cc: Fred Slota; Betty Greene Subject: RE: Master Permit Application -GREENE Project at Tala Point Hello Gary, Thanks for your response. Please complete the box titled "Project Description"at the top of the page and check the box marked "Building" under the heading "What kind of Permit?"on the front of the application. On the backside of the application sign the owner builder portion (for now) and check the boxes that apply relative to Project Type. Complete the " Estimated Cost" portion at the bottom of the page and fax it to me. My fax number is (360)379-4451. I will calculate the permit fees, fax it back and you can send me the original with your check. We are not currently able to accept credit cards. Please reference MLA05-00526 on the front of the application and the check. As long as we move forward with this in a timely manner we should have no difficulty in determining your application substantially complete by September 11. Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:13 AM To: Peter Bonyun Cc: Fred Slota; Betty Greene Subject: RE: Master Permit Application - GREENE Project at Tala Point Importance: High Thanks Peter, I will complete the Application for the bridge today. Which block should I check on the application? Can I fax it to you? I'm assuming there will be any additional fee for this? Do you accept credit cards? As you know, I am very concerned that our application is"substantially complete" prior to the expiration of our variance on 11 September. Mr. Slota, Any chance we could do this over the phone? I live and work in Seattle, and it is not particularly easy to get to Port Townsend during work hours. However if absolutely necessary, I could travel to Port Townsend on the 6th or 8th of September. First thing in the morning or late in the afternoon would be best for me. Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.GreeneCa�uscg.mil From: Peter Bonyun [mailto:pbonyun @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:00 AM To: Greene, Gary F. Cc: Fred Slota Subject: RE: Master Permit Application - GREENE Project at Tale Point Good morning Gary, 8/30/2005 • Page 2 of 2 I will be happy to fax you the copies of your applications today. I don't have electronic versions. There is another subject, however that we need to take care of. It wasn't until I began to stamp your plans as received that I discovered the drawings for the bridge. It was not mentioned during the application process, I missed it, and there is no application for it. We do need a permit application for the bridge and additionally, when you bring the application in, our Building Official, Fred Slota, would like to have the opportunity to discuss with you some aspects of your project. Fred is not available the balance of this week, but his schedule is fairly open next. If you could please let me know when you would be able to come in I will let Fred know and he will hold open a spot on his calendar. Thanks, Gary. Peter Bonyun, CPT Permit Technician II Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:26 AM To: Peter Bonyun Subject: Master Permit Application - GREENE Project at Tala Point Peter, Thank you for your help last Friday processing my building permit application for my property at 850 Tala Shore Drive (Parcel numbers 821151005 and 006). I was hoping you could send me copies of the Permit Application for both the primary residence and the garage/ADU. I need to attach them to my request to Fish and Wildlife for an Eagle Management Plan. If possible could you send electronic copies via email, or by fax to 206-220-7073. Also I was wondering if you know the name of the person who will be reviewing my application? Thanks for your assistance. Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene auscg.mil 8/30/2005 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR . Parcel 821151005 Printed: September 6, 2005 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner COM03-00068 GREENE P Application Received: 11/25/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Stormwater violations. No findings, conditions,or permissions found. PRE02-00006 MLA01-00553 SMITH F J SMITH Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/5/2002 Case Finaled: Variance from setbacks of Type V stream No findings,conditions, or permissions found. PRJ02-00008 MLA01-00553 SMITH P Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Site Plan Approval Advance Determination No findings,conditions, or permissions found. ZON01-00064 MLA01-00553 SMITH I F J SMITH Application Received: 11/2/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/22/2002 Case Finaled: 8/21/2003 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on November 7, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline Wetland Area; Shoreline Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Shoreline Flood Area (Zone A); Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area on South - Central Portion of Lot; Seismic Hazard -Western Half of the Lot; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ) and Type 1 Marine Shoreline. 2.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 3.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 5.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. The designer preparing the SPAAD report offered a conceptual design for an onsite sewage system. However, a complete design package was not reviewed.This SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute approval of this design and there may be other options available at the time of application for a septic permit. 6.) This Site Plan Approval Advance Determination approval is subject to removal of the existing culvert located between soil logs#3 and #4 as indicated on the site plan dated 10/25/01 and per the Revised Site Plan dated November 20, 2002. 7.) A Geotechnical Report was prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. for the property.The report was prepared November 18, 2002.The Report contains Conclusions and Recommendations for development of the property. 8.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses (2) All Commercial Uses (3) All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 9.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(2). 10.) This approval is for a Site Plan Advance Approval Determination (SPAAD) only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The Revised site plan as submitted on November 20 ,2002 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC. It has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 20, 2002 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 12.) The subject property has been designated Rural Residential (RR 1:5) under the Jefferson County Comperhensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. Page 1 of 5 Cases , Name Review Type Status Planner 13.) An address has not been assigned to the subject property. '14.) The proposed SPAAD was reviewed for consistency with the Site Plan Criteria of the Unified Development Code (Section 8.7).The criteria for approval is as follows: 1]The proposed site conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Shoreline Master Program and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff Comment:The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Master Program. The application was found to be in compliance with the Unified Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan.The proposal was not reviewed for consistency with the Shoreline Master Program as a tightline to the beach is anticipated in conjunction with a future building permit for a single family residence. 2]Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff Comment:The proposal was not reviewed for open space as the future building parcel is approximately 1.3 acres in size. The proposal was reviewed by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department to assure adequate sewage disposal. The Health Department reviewed the proposal and determined on November 26, 2001 that the site plan datedl0/25/01 (received 11/1/01) is adequate and soils are approved for a pressurized partial fill drainfield with ATU pretreatment system.The revised site plan identified a single well with a 50-foot exclusion zone for transport pipes and a 100-foot exclusion zone for drainfields. Based on the revised site plan received November 20, 2002, the well is existing and recently drilled. (See findings and conditions of this case related to Coastal SIPZ).The site is served by a private access road idenified as Tala Shore Drive.The site is beyond the end of the County Road, therefore, no road approach permit is necessary, per the Department of Public Works. An address has yet to be assigned to the parcel. The Jefferson County Department of Public Works has granted approval of a Conceptual Drainage Plan for the parcel on October 30, 2002.The applicant/contractor shall adhere to the approved Conceptual Drainage Plan for drainage/stormwater control. The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow because the parcel is not included within a known water system district, since it is on an individual well. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting. Application of Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP)fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source, and storage. 3]The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of the Unified Development Code and Chapter 43.21 C RCW. Staff Comment: Based on conditions of the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner related to application for Reasonablel Economic Use Variance under Section 3.6.4(h) of the Unified Development Code, probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan were evaluated. The evaluation included practical means to mitigate adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. (See findings and conditions related to the reasonable economic use variance). A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 has been prepared for the subject property.The report contains several conclusions and recommendations designed to lessen environmental impacts of the proposed site plan. (See findings and conditions related to the report). 4]Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safely and general welfare. Staff Comment:Approving the site plan will promote the public use and interest. Adequate provision has been or will be made for the public health, safety and general welfare. 15.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage disposal system design approval. Page 2 of 5 Cases - Name Review Type Status Planner 16.) Duration of Approval -Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5) years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5) year period,the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g.wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic,wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 17.) The parcel is located within a Coastal SPIZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002 that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but with no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in grounwater sources within 1000-feet. 18.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (see attached). 19.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 20.) Bare soils are subject to erosion,thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 21.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 22.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 23.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 24.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 25.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 26.) An engineered drainage control plan should be developed for this property to address items 4, 6&7 on page 4 of the Geotechnical Report. 27.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single-family residence. 28.) Minimum setback from the private access road (Tala Shore Drive) easement line shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be as recommended in the Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002. Owner/Applicant should contact the Environmental Health Department to determine setbacks from septic tank, drainfields and the well. 29.) Maximum impervious surface area coverage is 25 percent. Impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, driveways, rooftops, concrete, etc. 30.) Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Page 3 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 31.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL SIPZ: Water Conservation 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly; 2. Water collected from Storm Water and roof catchment may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4) Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5) Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6) Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 32.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL SIPZ: 1) Installation of a flow meter; 2) On-Going well monitoring for chloride concentration; and 3) Submittal of monitoring data to the County. 33.) MANDATORY MEASURES OF COASTAL SPIZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH -approved water system if available; 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: a) Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 34.) The Site Plan Advance Approval Determination (SPAAD) will become valid upon filing an approved restrictive covenant with the Jefferson County Audior's Office. 35.) If tightline disposal of storm water runoff is selected, a shoreline development exemption approval from Jefferson County will be required. Note the importance of the location of the end of a tight line pipe, i.e. how it is anchored/fastened in place; and what will be done to disapate the energy from the collected water where it exists from the end of the pipe. A "root wad" may be required at and below the end of the pipe outlet to disperse and slow water to minimize erosion of the face of the bluff and at the beach. 36.) If the tightline for runoff water ends waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark, SEPA review will be required in addition to Shoreline Development Exemption approval. 37.) The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Area Eagle Habitat Biologist Shelly Ament indicated that an Eagle Management Plan will be required BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR TREE REMOVAL ON THE PROPERTY. 38.) Because the streamside buffer area reduction, it is especially important to maintain the remaining buffer in its natural condition. No native vegetation or dead trees or shrubs should be removed from the stream buffer zone. Any invasive non-native species should be removed from the buffer area and controlled to prevent future invasion. 39.) The large conifers at the western end of the property and at the northern end of the bluff to the east of the property, which will provide habitat protection for the existing eagles and osprey using the nearby nest. A 30-foot deep vegetation buffer zone is also indicated on the SPAAD, which is an important contribution to maintaining bluff stability. 40.) The stream water flow patterns should not be altered in any way by channelizing, dredging or damming. Foot bridges over the stream shall be used to maintain the natural condition of the stream. Culverts should not be used for crossing the stream. 41.) Construction of the proposed two (2) structures will involve removal of existing native understory and small trees. Native vegetation at least equal to that removed and lost by construction will need to be planted in other buffer areas. Disturbances to soil and existing native plants should be kept to a minimum. 42.) Within the stream or other buffer areas, the use of chemicals is prohibited. The use of fertilizers and pesticides are to be avoided in order to maintain and provide a balance of the stream's ecosystem. Organic fertilizers and compost are to be used when enhancing the buffer area with native vegetation. Page 4 of 5 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 43.) The stream must be protected during construction. The access of construction and heavy equipment to the building pad on the east side of the stream is to be done in such a manner as to provide maximum protection of stream flow and hydrology. 44.) Every effort must be made by the owner/applicant/contractor(s)to direct stormwater runoff away from the stream and bluff area to prevent impacts to the stream's existing hydrology and the bluff stability. 45.) At the time of building permit application,the applicant is required to implement one of the three options of recommendation/condition number 8 of the Habitat Management Plan. 46.) The applicant is required to implement the Conditions of Hearing Examiner's Decision on the variance as per the findings, conclusions and decision dated September 11, 2002. ZONO2-00009 MLA01-00553 SMITH III F J SMITH Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/11/2002 Case Finaled: 8/21/2003 Request for a variance roam required 50 -foot buffer from a Type V stream for construction of a proposed single family residence, a garage w/office&gym and a driveway.The request is to reduce the buffer to a minimum of 10-feet for the residence, garage &driveway.The request is to vary from the buffer requirements of Subsection 3.6.8 and Table 3.2 Standard Streamside Buffers of the Unified Development Code. No findings,conditions, or permissions found. BLD05-00557 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: NSFR No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD05-00558 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU No findings,conditions,or permissions found. BLD05-00570 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P Application Received: 8/31/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: FOOT BRIDGE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. OTH03-00004 GREENE F S PORTO Application Received: 1/13/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: WET SEASON EVALUATION No findings, conditions,or permissions found. OTH03-00012 GREENE F L ATKINS Application Received: 12/11/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: WET SEASON EVALUATION No findings,conditions, or permissions found. SEP05-00290 GREENE P Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions,or permissions found. Page 5 of 5 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 821151005 03/10/2005 Owner Mailing Address: GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST # 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 Site Address: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW 98365 Section: 15 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: NE1/4 Fire Dist: Port Ludlow(3) Township: 28N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Paradise Bay(8) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S15 T28 R1E I TAX 6 &TL TAX B-12 I TRACT 2 OF UNREC FERN BAY 1 1/17 INTEREST IN TRACT 10 No Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=821151005+... 9/6/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 3 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map iiiii,014. ire, r ,J v 821151013 ,`.4 " - a „�zx* � h �.v i' _*e 'a 82115101'2,..,, ,,,,,,,,,,, , ,, ..m '', 821151011 d , _ ,. 821151010 ". e . X821151015 .t 821151002 - 4-,,o 8211510003 r , 821151008 �; a-a b n fi � � � „„.1,4r.� � �� �x+ �: : $21151417 � 4, F� �. s "'r+... a"< �„a. 821151006;",' -e ''^ .'�„'..: ,,,pc f ,� , ';t-�'' se ;'821-151C°35, r a , , ��a x �rx�iva �,�i"* $21151006 `_a'Ra "• ,1: t ,9. ��'�T t -ue' �. ,�s t ”, �"4 M tiro *� I w.a r a °..� .sue , M Via, --� �„ a 1 ,+ { M1 praaied by le/trmrn£w*y Cm iral Eenir:s GIs I i 1 I 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 9/6/2005 >= CC CV H O O 0' LL CV J0 Z LL \ 0 H O O I-I o U\ Cr) CI m — CO CV '7 Z 0 t. O O L J TO X = 'O n (' -I, m 0 O 0 Z -1-, v © H CD rn CC .1/1/3k, o J✓ .0 L U `�`1/3/ r- J O. Cl \� ;i, 1d=70 = (&I 7 m m , j ,3 (....6.7/ o } O U CC CC 'a I• Ill 0 C 0 3 CO 01 3 1- I- 40 O CO .- O CfD Z U J U 0 .-- t}- 'O CC O Q Z I C O CV LU CC H # I`-- -- CO .- LL I- 3 O 3 } CV I I- .- I- CO CO U Z CO CO CO 'O CC O W I-1 W co O C W .- X CC J W W I- W a LO Q Z I- LL 00 CC W Z W O •- I- 0 00 CC 0 Z LL I Y Q -- CC .- W W } X \ 0 LU LU CC 3 4.0 a. CV .- J LL CC CC Q ¢ W CC CC CO CC I- O LU CC I-- CC CD X 0 -1 OJ I- C9 W CD = CC CO di CV Z I- CC 3 W U LL! 'o CV I-1 - X L1J LL Z J CC U I- CO I- L LI I- CD J } I-- c.) I� Z CD a D- I- CV I- O LO X CC .- W CO 40 Z CC I- d' CC CD Q CC `� LU O a. O CC LU .4- LU CD CO I- I- CC i-t `�. CJ CD CO CV CA CD 03 — 4-1 O j LO O C.0 7 O 037 O CA . CV . L.0 n LU W 011 CC CO CD I� O O O .- Co O O O 10 L CO CD (A U CD CV CV O # C O LU CD •- L 3 L LU Y C — CD O ++ CD CC Cv Cn O CD -- a Co .0 co o co CD -o > co O L L a — o o O. L OD Ca X -F-+ U "a X 00 CO CL o --. -- Ca CD H I-- X 4- I- CO t 00 4- 4 . >-' CC CV I-1 O = O C3 LL CV Z LL H O O H O CO o -- -• CD \ O C) a) — co CV 7 Z 0 'o — CO .- O 0 L J -O X C: 'O +-I a) C C.)p Q CO Z 1i��1^ L1J 1 O -c 1--I L C C D �y�,�4� CC -D C) C.3 C.) Q ,1 �N/),f/ '� �' Z O .? C) J O. O_ % 4 ) J��� �- F- o l! y��l 9 �i QV0 C' j / o <! .._ 0= p za >- F— C) Cr CC C.) 'p N- UJ CO CC C = 3 CO RI 3 F- CC CO \ O CO .— 0 CID Z F- J C-) O Not -o cc Z 1 c O .— W Z H # 1` -- C7 .-- LL H 3 O 3 >- CV I I— .-* F— CD CO C.) F- co CO CO -p Cr O W Z LL CO p) C W .- X Cr hi J W LL F- W CL LO Q Z LL CO cc LL Z LU O .- F- = S ¢ O Z LL Y Q .. Cr W F- >- X o LL LL Cr X co C1 CO .-- -J U.. 1- CC CC <I LL Cr CC CD CC F- O .- Q I- C_ C9 g 0 J Cu —. CD LV CO X CO etS CO I- CC X Lu LL 'fl Cu - X Lu LL Z J CC C.) F- CO F- - LL F- a) J >• I- CJ H Z 0) CL >— F- Cu I- C) U) X CC O W 0) Cp X CC I--- .d- CC CD . • CC CC Z LL O O_ O CC W Ni- LL CD CO F- I- = S -F-' \ L) CD CO CU CO CD 10 — +-I 0 Cl) 7 v O O O 0) O O) ..- CV LID .- W -- LLJ CV Cr .- CO CD N O .-- O 0 .- CD C)) O O "Cl L. CO O) p) C.) CD CU Cu = # C CI LL CD -• C- 3 C_ LU Y C — 0) O -hi CD CC CD CL) 7) 0) -- = CD t 0) C) co CD -O > CO C) L L O. — O W a L CD O X ++ U 'O X (p CO 0_ W .- -- O 0) F- F- X q- F- CO I (U 4- * * F- Q DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET GARY F GREENS MLA05-00526 Date Time Comments I\Qj'L& Cow 051 Per(3-Trfr-4) — Oft Lr709 FESE zicct tO Pk-K U c4 1AtcJO"re) _ rt t 1141A477 Q-N APP.. �-- I:\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt SeptemL y Stacie Hoskins From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 8:13 AM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: BettyG @ucds.org; Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Attachments: Map Output_Esrimap.htm; Critical_Areas_gisserver338849488517.jpg Great distinction and very important, Gary! You'll want to show on your site plan the Ordinary High Water Mark (line of vegetation) and depict the 150-foot buffer line and 200- foot shoreline jurisdiction line as measured perpendicularly to the shoreline. I've attached an aerial photo with a 150-foot red line in a couple of formats for assistance. These layers aren't surveyed, but they help give some perspective. Any development within 200 feet of shoreline will require a shoreline exemption review with fee when you apply for the building permit. Anything outside of 150 feet will comply with the Shoreline Master Program. Any revision or new permit will require a consistency review. I've copied Sally Ellis with this to inform her for intake. Nice work! :) Stacie Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg,mil] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 8:00 AM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: BettyG @ucds.org Subject: RE: ,BLD05-558 Stacie, thanks for your continued assistance! I have done some more research and I don't believe any of the new garage is going to be in the 150 ft buffer. The proposed garage is 141 feet from the top of the bluff. Per the attached Geotech, the bluff is 60 ft high with an average slope of 47 degrees. When you do the math (tan(47) = 60/adjacent) the toe of the bank which I believe is also the "shoreline" is 56 feet from the bluff line. So the new garage will be 197 feet from the "shoreline" (141 + 56). However, because the footprint of the new one story garage is 50% larger than the footprint of the two story garage that is already permitted, I'm guessing that I am going to have to apply for a totally new buiding permit? Given this information, do you think I can skip the CAM and go straight to the pre- application conference? Is the pre-application conference optional or required? Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner 1 ,K,a App„..„,......Y , 3_ ' r� li. •f ^'a,•+1' �' w' "it::. `s.fa,:: „`i�;,. .' ,ipr, .a F. ':Y?a wee:... . '•'''',&:- '. N ..., '.. .. t 3 c." :. ' ':Tw> 5a.. •k." ,{,-xrr. : » i:..,:i,.: ii. d .Tf.4. .: ., + _ ,, ',,; [#;_(—c n , 'r`�vit, *' Efx s F r �:I t ilrr,,N ' • T r ; x .. ^1,`A„ E:• ? l :.� I. Fxe ;: 'J ib T:x 4jah . • is ... x ii .'.use. •..aa , I {„..• "�..v: •': ,. '' ':r,: :: - '1„:' j•''�'� F ..y• :. ...... .,a ::ice:: ,,, aE 1Y a tso 3. k P .6.-,i- \ s x .°?::.:d3:;',: '.. � .A1,-; y a.. %:, •'', w: ,i. t yr, i T 4„ 5 St, r �k `7 ''i4 M, i < s • S, F :r --t l k .M xi 1+ 1..'” t fit , x x Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil Original Message From: SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:43 AM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Hi, Gary, A CAM is an hourly assistance service we provide to help answer questions. A pre-application conference involves multiple departments, costs a lot more up front, and involves a meeting in our office with all departments involved in permitting a project (Planning, Environmental Health, Building, and Public Works). It seems like your questions are more geared to Planning, so I suggested the CAM process. You'll want to calculate the square footage in the 150-foot buffer in order to assess what percentage increase you're proposing. I hope this helps! Stacie From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 3:43 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Ok., thanks. I will fill out and submit the CAM. So is the "Customer Assistance Meeting" the same thing as the "Pre-Application Conference"? And when I calculate the square footage increase - is it the square footage located within the 150' buffer or the 150' buffer plus the 10' setback? Gary Greene 2 Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil From: SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:11 PM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Hi, Gary, There aren't any exemptions anymore for development on conforming lots (parcels greater than approximately 200 feet in depth) other than the one I previously mentioned. Increases beyond the 10% will require a conditional use permit and pre-application conference. You'll want to calculate the square footage increase that is located within the 150-foot buffer measured from Ordinary High Water Mark - usually the line of vegetation for the shoreline. The square footage is for the footprint, not the square footage on each floor. You may want to fill out a Customer Assistance Meeting form and pay for our time to review your project more specifically given your questions are getting more complicated than I can answer generally. You can access the form below and online at: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/default.htm. Customer Assistance Meeting (CAM) Effective 1/1/2014 DCD's 'coaching service' is provided through customer assistance meetings for direct consultation with our planning and building staff. This service was developed and previously subsidized by the EPA-funded Watershed Stewardship Resource Center grant <http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/WSRC.htm> over the last few years. With the grant ending, we continue to provide 15 minutes of free coaching to customers then charge an hourly CAM Fee for more extensive discussions, project guidance, and additional research. To get started, submit your completed CAM Intake Form <http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PDFS/Customer%20Assistance%20Meeting%20lntake% 20Form.pdf> to us by mail, fax, or email <mailto:dcd @co.jefferson.wa.us> or bring it with you during scheduled drop-in hours (first come, first served): * Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 9:00 am to 12:00 pm * Wednesday 1:30 - 4:30 pm 3 Depending on staff availability and the information you seek, your question may be answered 'on the spot' or require advance payment and scheduling. The CAM Fee is a minimum of one hour at DCD's hourly rate, not including the first 15 minutes of staff time. Additional time over one hour is billed in 15 minute increments. Upon submittal of a complete CAM Intake Form and up-front payment of the CAM Fee, an appointment will be scheduled for your CAM coaching session. Many customers find that this up-front expense saves them time, money and headaches in the long run! Why the Customer Assistance Meeting and Fee? <http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PDFS/Why%20the%20CAM%201-2-14.pdf> Stacie L. Hoskins Planning Manager, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:16 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Stacie, Although we are not expanding towards the water and we are reducing the height from a two story to a one story, we are increasing the footprint by 50%. Although the footprint increases the total square footage actually goes down by 400 square feet. The new garage would be 141 feet from the top of the Bluff. How is the distance to the "shoreline" measured? Or put another way, what is the definition of the "shoreline"? Obviously our primary residence, along with our neighbors to the north and south are all within 50 feet or so of the bluff. Are there any exemptions in the new shoreline master program due to these pre-existing structures? 4 Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil> Original Message From: SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us> [mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us> ] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 9:45 AM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Hi, Gary, I looked at the approved site plan, and gave it a quick look. We could vest you for the footprint of the approved garage, but any increase in area within 160 feet of the shoreline (150-foot buffer plus 10-foot setback) requires compliance with today's shoreline master program. It appears you could accomplish this if your expansion is less than 10% of the footprint area, is not extending waterward, and is not increasing in height. 5 Planning will address this independently of whether a new building permit is required for the project. Just make sure to submit a letter with your application stating you wish to revise the project and use the vesting of the approval under MLA05-00526/SDP05-00026. I hope this helps, and please let me know if you have any questions. Stacie L. Hoskins Planning Manager, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us> Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil> [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil> ] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:35 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Stacie, thanks for the quick response. We are expanding the footprint a few feet on the western side and a few feet to the North. Sally - Would it be possible to make an appointment for August 4th around 1000? Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil> 6 Original Message From: SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us>' [mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:SHoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us> ] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:30 PM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Hi, Gary, I requested the land use file from archives and will be able to give you better direction once I review it quickly. Will you be increasing the footprint closer to the shoreline (east) or on the western side of the garage? You will need to make an appointment with Sally Ellis, our Permit Technician, to submit a revision. You can contact her directly at (360) 379-4452 or by email at sellis @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:sellis @co.jefferson.wa.us> . I also copied Sally with this message for your convenience. Best regards, Stacie L. Hoskins Planning Manager, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us> Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who 7 asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. Original Message From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil> [mailto:Gary.F.Greene@uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil> ] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 9:36 AM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: FW: BLD05-558 Good Morning Stacie, We are finally ready to construct our garage at 850 Tala Shore Drive. We have had our permit for several years, but due to budget constraints we have decided to change it from a two story garage to a one story garage. It is still basically in the same location, but the foot print did get marginally larger. What is the process for revising our existing permit? Do I need to schedule a meeting to hand deliver the new plans? Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil <mailto:Gary.F.Greene @ uscg.mil> Original Message From: lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us> [mailto:lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us> ] 8 Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:36 PM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Subject: BLD05-558 Gary, This is to confirm our conversation this morning. I spoke with Carl Smith, Director and was determined by him that as long as you keep current on your renewal fee each year for the next 2-3 years, we will not cancel your permit so you will not lose your variance approval. It is suggested that any work you can accomplish within this first year, would be best. Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks, Lisa Keller, CPT Permit Technician II Dept of Community Development lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us <mailto:lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us> (360) 379-4450 All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note: DCD hours have changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday thru Thursday and closed on Fridays. 9 Stacie Hoskins From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil on behalf of Greene, Gary F CIV[Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:35 PM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Stacie, thanks for the quick response. We are expanding the footprint a few feet on the western side and a few feet to the North. Sally - Would it be possible to make an appointment for August 4th around 1000? Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.Greene(duscg.mil Original Message From: SHoskins(7aco.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:SHoskins @co.iefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:30 PM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Cc: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD05-558 Hi, Gary, I requested the land use file from archives and will be able to give you better direction once I review it quickly. Will you be increasing the footprint closer to the shoreline (east) or on the western side of the garage? You will need to make an appointment with Sally Ellis, our Permit Technician, to submit a revision. You can contact her directly at (360) 379-4452 or by email at sellisOco.-iefferson.wa.us. I also copied Sally with this message for your convenience. Best regards, Stacie L. Hoskins Planning Manager, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins(8co.lefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. Original Message From: Gary.F.GreenePuscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 9:36 AM To: Stacie Hoskins Subject: FW: BLD05-558 Good Morning Stacie, We are finally ready to construct our garage at 850 Tala Shore Drive. We have had our permit for several years, but due to budget constraints we have decided to change it from a two story garage to a one story garage. It is still basically in the same location, but the foot print did get marginally larger. What is the process for revising our existing permit? Do I need to schedule a meeting to hand deliver the new plans? Thanks, Gary Gary Greene Facility Planner Thirteenth Coast Guard District 206-220-7029 Gary.F.GreeneOuscg.mil Original Message From: lisa0co.jefferson.wa.us [mailto:lisa0co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:36 PM To: Greene, Gary F CIV Subject: BLD05-558 Gary, This is to confirm our conversation this morning. I spoke with Carl Smith, Director and was determined by him that as long as you keep current on your renewal fee each year for the next 2-3 years, we will not cancel your permit so you will not lose your variance approval. It is suggested that any work you can accomplish within this first year, would be best. Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks, Lisa Keller, CPT Permit Technician II Dept of Community Development lisa @co.jefferson.wa.us (360) 379-4450 All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note: DCD hours have changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday thru Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 1 r-Yuae • -�- '. Washington Coastal + r Department of HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL . ■ 48 Devonshire Road=.7 r. FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 985de "< WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 c c saw Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 o Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A ..; ti c -H PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Gary Greene t 2242 NW Market Street,#166 n Seattle,WA 98107 / V ` 206-220-7029 Project Name: Greene Tala Shores Stt c 5 502 Co Project Description: Septic, stormwater and yards of pea gravel spread-out e ion of a 24-inch permanent culvE - PRO 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begi ,__..-- „y November 15, 2008 unless the Area Habitat Biol..,u.,isteu Delow approves working outside of these dates due the presence of a completely dry stream channel. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than 3 working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Enforcement Sergeant listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than three working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 4. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Septic System, Parcel#821151005 & 006 Stream Crossing Detail for Gary Greene and dated August 13, 2005, and Greene Residence Temporary Culvert Installation and Removal and dated June 19, 2006, and Greene Residence Site Plan modified by G.F. Greene dated June 19, 2006, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. Septic, Stormwater Conveyance and Waterline Installation Provisions: Page 1 of 6 • Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 5. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. 6. The conduit shall be installed at sufficient depth so that the conduit cannot become exposed during future streambed scouring. 7. When using tren excavation, es excavated in the dry or from the flowing stream.ch Plowing, placementthe trench , and shall covering be shall occur in a single shall pass be of the equipment. Disturbance of the streambed as a result of the plowing operation shall be limited to the amount necessary to complete the project. 8. Trenches shall be backfilled with native material removed during the trench excavation, and the streambed shall be returned to preproject condition. 9. The conduit approach trench shall be isolated from the stream until laying of the conduit across the stream occurs. Temporary Streamflow Bypass Provisions (if necessary): 10. A temporary bypass to divert flow around the work area shall be in place prior to initiation of other work in the wetted perimeter. 11. The bypass shall be of sufficient size to pass all flows and debris for the duration of the project. 12. Prior to releasing the water flow to the project area, all conduit installation shall be completed. 13. Upon completion of the project, all material used in the temporary bypass shall be removed from the site and the site returned to preproject or improved conditions. Equipment Provisions: 14. Equipment used for this project may operate below the ordinary high water line, provided the drive mechanisms (wheels, tracks, tires, etc.) shall not enter or operate below the ordinary high water line. Page 2 of 6 ... Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 15. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities along the stream. Water Quality Provisions: 16. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. 17. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. 18. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 19. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Re-vegetation Provision: 20. Alteration or disturbance of the bank and bank vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calender days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. Permanent Culvert Installation Provisions: 21. Disturbance of the streambed and banks shall be limited to that necessary to place the culvert and any required channel modification associated with it. Affected streambed and bank areas outside the culvert shall be restored to preproject condition following installation of the culvert. 22. The permanent 24-inch culvert shall be installed in the dry or in isolation from stream flow by the installation of a bypass to divert the stream flow around the work area. 23. 15 cubic yards of washed pea-gravel shall be placed and spread-out evenly within the stream channel as mitigation for impacts that will result from the permanent culvert. l 77 --\ N f Page 3 of 6 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 24. The culvert shall consist of a single barrel. 25. The culvert shall not exceed 20 feet in total length. 26. Approach material shall be structurally stable and be composed of material that if eroded into the stream shall not be detrimental to fish life. 27. The culvert shall be constructed to pass the 100-year peak flow with consideration of debris likely to be encountered. PROJECT LOCATIONS Location #1 Greene Residence WORK START: June 01, 2008 (WORK END: November 15, 2008 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 17.0189 Unnamed Tributary 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91749 W 122.65461 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically Chapter 77.55 RCW(formerly RCW 77.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local,state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. Page 4 of 6 Depat Washington t Department of HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL co k\ dC]EJV 8 nshire ' 6 � FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 NOV 2 6 2007 Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A SW tl C 11N� Lf#i;1 , ► grn u All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.141 are subject to additional restrictions,conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.301. APPEALS INFORMATION If you wish to appeal the issuance or denial of,or conditions provided in a Hydraulic Project Approval,there are informal and formal appeal processes available. A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021, 77.55.141,77.55.181,and 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30 days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party,and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached,or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Technical Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal,a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation,stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties; or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act,Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091,within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization only), 77.55.141, 77.55.181,or 77.55.241: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two- Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in Page 5 of 6 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL coastal 10 Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: November 05,2007 Control Number: 102795-4 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2008 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS results in forfeiture of all appeal rights. If there is no timely request for an appeal,the department action shall be final and unappealable. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry (28) P3 Habitat Biologist I,- - ��..--, . for Director Jeff Davis 360-895-3965 --- `-.. --' -w-7. WDFW CC: Michelle Farfan, Jefferson County DCD Marty Ereth, Skokomish Tribe Natural Resources Dept. Page 6 of 6 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR CASE # BLD05-00557 1.) Revised 5/2/06: Letter dated January 21, 2003 from Jerry Smith: Condition 23 of the SPAAD approval stated that"a 30-foot deep vegetation buffer zone is also indicated on the SPAAD, which is an important contribution to maintaining bluff stability. "It wasn't my intent to refer to a 30-foot buffer zone on the SPAAD. In reviewing the file, I noted that the actual SPAAD that was approved on November 22, 2002 does not show a 30-foot buffer. I would put considerable weight on the approved SPAAD. Hence, it is my conclusion that the buffer would not be required. So it seems that the approved SPAAD and the condition are out of sync with each other". 2.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc.was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 3.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 4.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream & landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 6.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 8.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 9.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM. 10.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer - Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 13.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 14.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 15.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 16.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 17.) An engineered Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 18.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 19.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 20.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 21.) Not more than two (2) unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC)Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13)or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). 22.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 23.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 24.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 25.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 26.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 27.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 28.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 29.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 30.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 31.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 32.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 33.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 34.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 35.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. 36.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING,AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC.AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping"OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 37.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS,AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 38.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 39.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 40.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS,AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 41.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED, THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, 42.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY, TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. 43.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY, AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER(WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES)CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER(WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES)THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 44.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL,ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS, THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. 45.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE,AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206)459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR(206)753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 46.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE, EROSION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 47.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys &Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. 48.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan signed by WDFW on January 6, 2006 and signed by applicant on January 10, 2006. 49.) Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. I:\F_BLD_Permit_Buildng.rpt 10/29/19 Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan To: Stacie Hoskins; 'Gary.F.Greene@uscg.mil';Al Scalf Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: RE: GREENE-Tala Shores Building Permit Hi Gary: I had a chance to review your MLA file and I believe here's is what happened: The Code requires a minimum 30 foot vegetative buffer from top or toe of a bank on a landslide hazard area. I inadvertently typed in "50 foot"as that was the required geotech setback not the buffer. I have corrected the setback in our permit data base and will send you a new set of revised conditions. Sorry for any inconvenience. Thanks. Michelle Farfan project Planner Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA1 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-443 (fax) Original Message From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:04 PM To: 'Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil' Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Hi Gary, We did receive your letter. I'll speak with Michelle tomorrow, review the file and update you then. Thank you for your patience. Sincerely, c.9.-ta,e4Q Development Services Manager, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us 5/2/2006 Page 2 of 2 From: Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil [mailto:Gary.F.Greene @uscg.mil] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 10:03 AM To: Stacie Hoskins Cc: BGreene @GrahamDunn.com Subject: GREENE -Tala Shores Building Permit Good Morning Stacie, On April 24th I mailed the attached letter to Mr. Scalf. I would like to confirm that the County received it, and request to know your anticipated timeline for responding. Also, on our approved site plan we identified which trees were being removed and which trees were being retained. During the most recent winter storms, two of the trees identified to be retained were blown down. Tree# 40 was completely blown down with the entire root ball coming out of the ground. Tree number 10 had the top 1/3 blown off. Finally, we have determined that our driveway as depicted on the approved site plan will not allow adequate access for the construction vehicles. There is also concern that fire trucks will also not be able to make the turn. Therefore we have devised a new routing that still avoids the septic area and only requires the removal of one small softwood tree. Do I need to some how revise our site plan to reflect the fact that nature has removed all or part of these two trees, and that we are going to very slightly reroute the driveway? Thanks, Gary Gary F. Greene Facility Planning Officer Thirteenth Coast Guard District(rs) Resource Management Division Phone: 206-220-7029 FAX: 206-220-7073 Gary.F.Greene(a�uscg.mil 5/2/2006 Oryr _ _ F E R: Gary Greene C AL r 2442 NW Market St,#166 `1 i x Seattle,WA 98107 206-794-2794 i APR 2 6 � t April 24,2006 Mr.Al Scalf Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Mr.Scalf: I would like to appeal condition #1 of our Type I Land Use Permit (MLA05-00526) issued on January 30,2006. Condition#1 states"A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area.". Prior to purchasing our property we obtained a Site Plan Approved Advance Determination (MLA01- 00553). The SPAAD Site Plan dated November 20, 2002 and approved on November 22, 2002 does not include this 50' buffer. In fact the approved site plan includes a ground level patio extending some 20 feet out into the 50'buffer that is now being required by the building permit. Although the approved SPAAD site plan does not include a buffer, condition#23 of the SPAAD implies that there is a 30' buffer on the eastern edge of the property. In my January 12th 2003 letter to the County (attached), I requested clarification of this apparently erroneous requirement. As noted in my letter, early draft versions of the SPAAD site plan did include a 30' buffer on the eastern edge of the property. However, in response to comments contained in the "Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner for Variance Application"dated August 29, 2002 that concluded this buffer was not required,the buffer was eliminated. On January 21, 2003 the County responded to my inquiry (letter attached) and confirmed that a 30 ft buffer was not required on the eastern edge of the property. Based on the assurances of the SPAAD, we purchased the property with the belief that we could develop the property as approved on the SPAAD site plan. This did not include a vegetation buffer along the eastern edge of our property. I also note that although the approved building permit now is requiring a 50 ft buffer,the approved plans also allow for a patio that extend into the 50 ft buffer. With the exception of a patio, we do not intend to significantly remove or disturb the native ground cover. However we do want to be able to construct a reasonably sized patio and to remove the numerous large felled trees that obstruct the view. We look forward to your response to our request. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. I can be reached at 206-794-2794 or at GFGreene @bbxmail.net. Sincerely, Gary F. Greene Betty and Gary Greene 7962 Grand Ave Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 206-780-9236 January 12th, 2003 Mr. Jerry Smith Associate Planner Jefferson County, Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Jerry: Wanted to let you know that in early December we became the new owners of the property out at Tala Shores! Thank you for your patience and expertise as you helped us navigate the Variance and SPAAD requirements. Without your assistance it is unlikely that we would have persevered in this endeavor. We have retained an architect and are starting to develop actual house plans for the site. As we embark on this next phase of the project, I seek your assistance in clarifying a few conditions of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) issued on November 22, 2002. On the approved SPADD site plan there is no bluff buffer depicted. Although depicted on earlier draft versions submitted to the County, it was removed in response to comments contained in the"Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner for Variance Application"dated August 29, 2002. On page six of that report, it states that a natural vegetated buffer of 30 feet in not required. Yet Condition 23 of the approved SPAAD makes reference to this 30 foot vegetation buffer. I request clarification confirming that a formal 30 foot vegetation buffer is not required along the bluff. Rest assured that we have no intention of installing a manicured lawn right to the top of the bluff. Rather we envision keeping all of the native low plants like ferns and sallal while removing view blocking and typically non-native shrubs like black berries. We would also carefully remove large fallen trees that were cut down but not removed years ago when the site was first cleared. Condition 29 of the SPAAD directs us to implement one of the three options of recommendation/condition 8 of the Habitat Management Plan. We chose to implement recommendation 8.b. —"Obtain a Geotech Report to determine the advisability of moving the residence closer to the bluff'. The Geotech Report concluded that the house should be no closer than 50 feet to the bluff; the distance already depicted on the approved SPAAD site plan. I believe by undertaking the Geotech Report we have satisfied Condition 29 of the SPAAD. Does the County concur? 4 J I also request assistance in determining the required building set-back on our southern property line. As you may be aware, our neighbor immediately to the south has formally recorded an encroachment that extends into the proposed building envelop approved on the SPAAD site plan. However the actual property lines have not been adjusted. Within the building envelop this encroachment ranges from approximately 10 to 17 feet. Per the Uniform Development Code, the minimum side setback from the property line is only 5 feet. Can we place our residence immediately adjacent to the recorded encroachment? Doing so will more than comply with the 5 foot side setback to the recorded property line. We have been working with Northwest Territories to develop a Storm Water and Erosion Control Plan. In early December they presented us with a plan. In early January they informed us that the County recently adopted new drainage regulations and that they would need to modify our Plan. Could you tell me when these regulations became effective, and when and how the public became aware of them. Finally, hopefully within the week we will be submitting the required "Declaration of Restrictive Covenant"to allow the two building lots to be considered one. Also, although not required, we have initiated a"Wet Season Trial"to determine if we can employ a simpler type of septic drain field. I also plan on working directly with the Jefferson County Department of Public Works to initiate the re-routing of the up-land storm water into the County easement to the south of our property. As always, thank you for your continuing assistance. Sincerely, 7ce- G F. reeve gsoN co JEFFERSON COUNTY . 9 teA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti 4 rC 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 SING Al Scalf, Director January 21, 2003 Betty and Gary Greene 7962 Grand Avenue Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Dear Gary and Betty: Congratulations on becoming property owners in Jefferson County! I have enjoyed working with you to help you get to this point in making your dreams come true. In reference to condition 23 of the SPAAD, I offer the following, you are correct; this SPAAD condition does state, "A 30-foot deep vegetation buffer zone is also indicated on the SPAAD, which is an important contribution to maintaining bluff stability."It wasn't my intent to refer to a 30-foot buffer zone on the SPAAD. In reviewing the file, I noted that the actual SPAAD that was approved on November 22, 2002 does not show a 30-foot buffer. I would put considerable weight on the approved SPAAD. Hence, it is my conclusion that the buffer would not be required. So, it seems that the approved SPAAD and the condition are out of sync with each other. I can modify the condition if you like. Let me know. I can't envision that you would ever remove all the vegetation and plant a lawn between the house and the top of the bluff when native vegetation is important to bluff stability, which is important to you and the county. Regarding condition 29, I have reviewed the Habitat Management Plan recommendation # 8 to re-acquaint myself with the 3 options. Based on the wording of condition 29, you were given a choice of implementing 1 of the 3 options. I believe that providing a geotech is certainly consistent with condition#29. I have no doubt that you will implement the 9 recommendations in the geotech report,which would be a secondary part of condition#29. I note that condition 29 makes reference to complying with one of the 3 options at the time of building permit application. Until now, our office hasn't been aware of your neighbor to the south recording an "encroachment"that extends into the proposed building envelope approved on the SPAAD site plan. SPAAD condition# 13 established a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet from the south and north property lines. And, as you stated in your letter, the Unified Development Code is the basis for side yard setbacks. Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning Page 1 of 2 (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 The required setbacks are the minimum, therefore there is nothing to prevent you from setting your structures back more than 5 feet from a side property line. I would certainly encourage you to consult with an attorney on this encroachment, after all it's now your property and your neighbor has use of that part of it. Yes, the County Board of Commissioners adopted a new stormwater manual (the 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington). It was adopted by ordinance, which was effective December 13, 2002. It is still in effect, however, the Board of Commissioners are in the process of setting a public hearing date for an ordinance that would delay the effective date of the 2001 manual until either 1 June 2003 or 1 July 2003. It looks like the county is headed toward delaying the effective of the 2001 manual until sometime this summer. But, it's not official. At the same time we need to keep in mind that that the Board of Commissioners could also delay implementation of the 2001 Manual even longer or they could repeal the adopting ordinance. The primary reason for a delay of the effective date would be to allow the department and the development community time to be trained on the 2001 Manual. The department's goal is to be ready when the date (1 June or 1 July) comes. The department's instruction to applicants is that within a few weeks we're likely to see an ordinance from the Board of Commissioners delaying implementation until summer. The choices are: 1)wait a while before developing your stormwater management plans or, 2) if you're in a hurry, move forward under the 2001 Manual, which is technically still in effect. I think this will answer your questions. Thanks for letting us know of your plans to submit the "Declaration of Restrictive Covenant", to initiate a"Wet Season Evaluation", and your intent to work with the Department of Public Works on the re-routing of the up- land runoff water. Again, thank you for your kind words of appreciation and your support regarding my performance. I wish you continued success as you move forward in making your dream become reality. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, er, Jerry mith Page 2 of 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE LAND USE PERMIT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT(RCW 90.58) PROPONENT: GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 DATE ISSUED: January 28, 2006 DATE EXPIRES: January 28, 2007 MLA NUMBER:MLA05-00526 CASE NUMBER:SDP05-00026 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SDP exemption to collect and tightline stormwater water over shoreline bluff. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: HOOD CANAL PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 821 151 005, Section 15, Township 28, Range 01 East, WM, located at 850 Tala Shore Dr, Port Ludlow,WA 98365 FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on November 21, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ). 3.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area)has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 7.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 8.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce(Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine(Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes:Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple(Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera)Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose(Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa),Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 9.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge(primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 10.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 11.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 12.) The revised site plan received on December 27, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated January 30, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 13.) This approval is for a stormwater tightline only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 14.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.5 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit(SDP)requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 15.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.5,which exempts the"construction by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence [in shoreline jurisdiction]for the owner's or owner's family's use..."from the substantial development permit(SDP)requirements under certain provisions. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 16.) Evidence suggests that the bluff area related to the parcel in question is subject to erosion and mass wasting. Vigilant maintenance of the stormwater runoff tightline to the beach is important to avoid a negative contribution to bluff instability. 17.) Stormwater runoff tightline piping can be subject to weakening through ultraviolet radiation exposure and mechanical damage due to trees, rocks and debris. A more durable material for the tightline will provide greater defense against the elements. 18.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 19.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However, the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 20.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance (ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004&OTH03-0012)were finaled. A septic permit(SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit(BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence(BLD05-0557). A building permit for a (BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. 21.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006 &821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. CONDITIONS: 1.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 2.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 3.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code(UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 4.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream &landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 6.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 8.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 9.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM. 10.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet,whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the approved Eagle Habitat Management Plan. 13.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3)gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 14.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 15.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 16.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 17.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 18.) An engineered Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 19.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 20.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 21.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 22.) Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted on August 25, 2005 as it exists now or is hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology. 23.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 24.) The applicant/owner and all future owners are responsible for maintaining and protecting the stormwater runoff tightline to the beach against damage due to normal wear,weather exposure, and/or trees, rocks and debris. If and when damage occurs to the tightline that renders it ineffective, the responsible party must execute the necessary repairs as soon as possible and no longer than 30 days. 25.) The stormwater runoff tightline piping must be composed of durable material that is resistant to weakening and damage due to time,weather exposure(including ultraviolet radiation), and impacts from trees, rocks and debris. The corrugated plastic material used for tightline construction in the past is no longer acceptable. More durable plastic or ultraviolet radiation-resistant flexible rubber material shall be required. 26.) The stormwater runoff tightline shall be designed and placed in order to minimize visual impacts to users of the beach and nearby waters. 27.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE"DRAINAGE, EROSION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 28.) Residential developers and individual p a builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. NOTICE: This exemption does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered,all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8,2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development,especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact Brian Gorman at(206)526-6613 at the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503)231-6121. // 41 u... . ■1111ri A ,._ ilatm>6 D-pa i entofComm ni revelooment Sta c: Department of Ecol s ,Shorelands Office,Jeffree Stewart Washington State Department of Fish&Wildlife, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, G re4A42.0.,, m o,rirGi_ sti # 1 ( -SL. 1 t LE \NA 81 Loia- if _ ecf+le WA cis to-7 ..- t . .- -...........- 0 a,'N2.' • tJ,A....' .,s r t t 1 i 2 6 2006 ' 4 Mr A1 ScQ(P co - 0 e,e/opm-e,t 6 a t si,,,--.dc., sl baiiiiinidlindhhhi h •' AGENCY USE ONLY Agency Reference#: Date Received: Circulated by: (local govt.or agency) JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) (for use In Washington State) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK ❑Application for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form and the(Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition)to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish &Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS—You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days. Based on the instructions provided,I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) 1 Local Government for shoreline: ❑Substantial Development ❑Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑Exemption ❑ Revision ❑ Floodplain Management ®Critical Areas Ordinance l Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) ❑ Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification(to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit) ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification ❑ Corps of Engineers for: ❑Section 404 ❑Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for General Bridge Act Permit ❑ For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications. 1.APPLICANT Gary Greene MAILING ADDRESS 21142 -F/4E N.W.Market St.,#166,SPc1 j 2,(k)/ - t g to-3 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 206-220-7029 206-794-2794 If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2. Be sure agent signs Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT MAILING ADDRESS WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 3.RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: ®OWNER ❑PURCHASER ❑LESSEE ❑OTHER: 4.NAME,ADDRESS,AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S),IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT: - 5.LOCATION(STREET ADDRESS,INCLUDING CRY,COUNTY AND ZIP CODE,WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCUR) 850 Tale Shore Dr.,Port Ludlow,WA 98365(North side of 830 Tafa Shore Dr.) 4r LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION(CITY OR COUNTY) Jefferson County WATERBODY YOU ARE WORKING IN: Hood Canal TRIBUTARY OF VVRIA# IS THIS WATERBODY ON THE 303(d)LIST?YES❑ NO MI Hood Canal IF YES,WHAT PARAMETER(S)? http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wq/links/imoaired wtrs.html wmasr m FOR 303d LIST '/.SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE GOVERNMENT LOT SHORELINE DESIGNATION NE 15 28 1E LATITUDE&LONGITUDE: 47 55 12 N ZONING DESIGNATION 122 38 14 W Rural Residential 1:5 TAX PARCEL NO: DNR STREAM TYPE,IF KNOWN 821151005&821151006 n!0- JARPA, Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version, 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 1 8.DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY,AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY HAVE YOU COMPLETED ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTMTY ON THIS PROPERTY? CI YES ❑NO FOR ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED ON THIS PROPERTY,INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION. Vacant with existing well IS THE PROPERTY AGRICULTURAL LAND? ❑YES ❑NO ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT? ❑YES ❑NO 7a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED WORK THAT NEEDS AQUATIC PERMITS: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE,INCLUDING TYPES OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. IF APPLYING FOR A SHORELINE PERMIT,DESCRIBE AU WORK WITHIN AND BEYOND 200 FEET OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK. IF YOU HAVE PROVIDED ATTACHED MATERIALS TO DESCRIBE YOUR PROJECT,YOU STILL MUST SUMMARIZE THE PROPOSED WORK HERE. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. Installation of a stormwater discharge to Hood Canal.The entire project will be located above the line or ordinary high water and will consist of a stormwater collection system on the uplands,a tightline pipe down the slope,and an energy dissipater located just above the line of ordinary high water as shown on the attached plans. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: SEE SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE,BUT THESE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAY BE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 7b. DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND WHY YOU WANT OR NEED TO PERFORM IT AT THE SITE. PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE DESIGN. Discharge of stormwater directly to marine water is required as a condition of a variance.The tightline pipe and energy dissipater is necessary to avoid erosion. 7c DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE,WATER QUALITY,WATER SUPPLY, RECREATION,and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID,MINIMIZE,AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS,AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION OF FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE. IDENTIFY WHICH GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS YOU HAVE USED. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. This project was designed to minimize impacts to marine waters.There will be visual impacts(the energy dissipater will be visible from the beach)and there may be minor impacts such as noise during construction. { is '`'°( 26 2005 1 L) Jt":FF r',�.0": COUNTY 7d. FOR IN WATER CONSTRUCTION WORK,WILL YOUR PROJECT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WATER QU DEPT.OF C(% �Pd�j f Y DEVELOPMENT- WAC 173.201A-110? CI YES ❑NO (SEE USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS) 8.WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES? Will be continuous construction on a dry day with no rain forecast until erosion control measures are in place. ❑YES tEl NO PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Summer of 2006 or 2007 ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY: 10-12 hours in vicinity of marine waters 9.CHECK IF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED: Not Applicable ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAL WATERS;AND/OR ❑WATERWARD OF MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS 10.WILL FILL MATERIAL(ROCK,FILL,BULKHEAD,OR OTHER MATERIAL)BE PLACED: Not applicable JARPA,Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version, 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 2 ❑WATIWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS? No IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) /AREA (ACRES) 0'WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAL WATERS? No IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) AREA (ACRES) 11.WILL MATERIAL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS? ❑YES CLINO IF YES: A. IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES: B. HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO C. HAS A WETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO D. TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAL(E.G.,SAND,ETC.): E. MATERIAL SOURCE: F. LIST ALL SOIL SERIES(TYPE OF SOIL)LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE,&INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTY'S LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS.SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(NRCS): G WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? ❑YES ❑NO IF YES,IMPACTED AREA IS_ACRES OFDRAINED WETLANDS. NOTE: If your project will impact greater than%of an acre of wetland,submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval along with the JARPA form NOTE:a 401 water quality certification will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project Impacts wetlands that are: a)greater than X acre in size,or b)tidal wetlands or wetlands adjacent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA lone and mitigation plan to Ecology for an individual 401 certification if a)orb)applies. 12. STORMWATER COMPLIANCE FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS ONLY: THIS PROJECT IS(OR WILL BE)DESIGNED TO MEET ECOLOGY'S MOST CURRENT STORMWATER MANUAL,OR AN ECOLOGY APPROVED LOCAL STORMWATER MANUAL ❑YES ❑NO IF YES-WHICH MANUAL WILL YOUR PROJECT BE DESIGNED TO MEET If NO-FOR CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 AND 404 PERMITS ONLY-PLEASE SUBMIT TO ECOLOGY FOR APPROVAL, ALONG WITH THIS JARPA APPLICATION,DOCUMENTATION THAT DEMONSTRATES THE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM YOUR PROJECT OR ACTIVITY WILL COMPLY WITH THE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS,WAC 173.201(A) 13.WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS? ❑YES ®NO IF YES: A. VOLUME' (CUBIC YARDS)/AREA (ACRES) B. COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED: C. DISPOSAL SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAL: D. METHOD OF DREDGING: 14.HAS THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)BEEN COMPLETED? Not Applicable ❑ YES ❑NO SEPA LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County SEPA DECISION: DNS,MDNS,EIS,ADOPTION,EXEMPTION DECISION DATE(END OF COMMENT PERIOD):_DNS_ SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION 15.LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS,APPROVALS,OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTION,DISCHARGES,OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION(I.E.,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,HEALTH DISTRICT APPROVAL,BUILDING PERMIT,SEPA REVIEW,FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE(FERC),FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION,ETC.)ALSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE ALL EXISTING WORK ON DRAWINGS. NOTE:FOR USE WITH CORPS NATIONWIDE PERMITS,IDENTIFY WHETHER YOUR PROJECT HAS OR WILL NEED AN NPDES PERMIT FOR DISCHARGING WASTEWATER AND/OR STORMWATER. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETED? NO. Septic System Jefferson County Health Department None assigned yet.August,2004 Stormwater Management Jefferson County Planning None assigned yet. August,2004 Building Permit Jefferson County Building None assigned yet. August,2004 16.HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTMTY YOU'RE APPLYING FOR OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTIVITY = . e....___rt-- __.� HEREIN?❑YES x NO IF YES,EXPLAIN: 7 , JARPA,Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version, 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 3 SECTION B-Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits QQ(pj 1 ja. TOTAL COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT,INCLUDING MATERIALS,LABOR,MACHINE RENTALS,ETC. 17b. IF A PROJECT OR ANY PORTION OF A PROJECT RECEIVES FUNDING FROM A FEDERAL AGENCY,THAT AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESA CONSULTATION. PLEASE INDICATE IF YOU WILL RECEIVE FEDERAL FUNDS AND WHAT FEDERAL AGENCY IS PROVIDING THOSE FUNDS. SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR INFORMATION ON ESA" FEDERAL FUNDINIG O YES ONO IF YES,PLEASE LIST THE FEDERAL AGENCY 18.LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION: 19.FOR CORPS,COAST GUARD,AND DNR PERMITS,PROVIDE NAMES,ADDRESSES,AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES,ETC... PLEASE NOTE: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE—CONSULT YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER SECTION C-This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application 20.APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE,COMPLETE,AND ACCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE,THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED,IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WORK. I AGREE TO START WORK ONLY AFTER ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE 5/0 ` o 5 it.., SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT ^� DATE S 11 tJ DATE I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR) ' THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S.0 1001 § provides that: Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than 510,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline,such as marine,stream,lake,lagoon, marsh,bog,swamp,flood plain,floodway,delta;type of beach,such as accretion,erosion,high bank, low bank,or dike;material such as sand,gravel, mud,clay, rock,riprap;and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units,existing and potential,that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance,set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use,or,in the case of a variance,from which the variance is being sought: These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions. !l I JARPA, Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version,360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 4 A AGENCY USE ONLY Agency Reference#: Date Received: Circulated by: (local govt.or agency) JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) (for use in Washington State) 1 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK ( ❑Application for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form and the(Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition)to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish&Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS—You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days. Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) l Local Government for shoreline: ❑Substantial Development ❑Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Exemption ❑ Revision ❑Floodplain Management ®Critical Areas Ordinance ® Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) ❑ Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification(to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit) ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification ❑ Corps of Engineers for: ❑Section 404 ❑Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for General Bridge Act Permit ❑ For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications. 1.APPLICANT Gary Greene MAILING ADDRESS 22242 N.W.Market St.,#166 , ea-Ek\e W Pt CA$\G7 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 206-220-7029 206-794-2794 If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2. Be sure agent signs Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT MAILING ADDRESS WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE ^ FAX# 3.RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: ®OWNER ❑PURCHASER O LESSEE ❑OTHER: 4.NAME,ADDRESS,AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S),IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT: , ` 2 S 5.LOCATION(STREET ADDRESS,INCLUDING CITY,COUNTY AND ZIP CODE,WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCJR) I( t i i Y 850 Tala Shore Dr.,Port Ludlow,WA 98365(North side of 830 Tale Shore Dr.) DEN.C F C(• x+I‘ f .E I(}F(.;5,F N T LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION(CITY OR COUNTY) Jefferson County WATERBODY YOU ARE WORKING IN: Hood Canal TRIBUTARY OF WRIA# IS THIS WATERBODY ON THE 303(d)LIST?YES 0 NO IBS Hood Canal IF YES,WHAT PARAMETER(S)? http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wq/links/impaired wtrs.html WEBSITE FOR 303d LIST '/.SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE GOVERNMENT LOT SHORELINE DESIGNATION NE 15 28 1E LATITUDE&LONGITUDE: 47 55 12 N ZONING DESIGNATION Rural Residential 1:5 122 38 14 W TAX PARCEL NO: DNR STREAM TYPE,IF KNOWN 821151005&821151006 n/a JARPA,Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version,360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 1 6.DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY,AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY. HAVE YOU COMPLETED ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ON THIS PROPERTY? O YES O NO FOR ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED ON THIS PROPERTY,INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION. Vacant with existing well IS THE PROPERTY AGRICULTURAL LAND? O YES O NO ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT? O YES O NO 7a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED WORK THAT NEEDS AQUATIC PERMITS: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE,INCLUDING TYPES OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. IF APPLYING FOR A SHORELINE PERMIT,DESCRIBE ALL WORK WITHIN AND BEYOND 200 FEET OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK IF YOU HAVE PROVIDED ATTACHED MATERIALS TO DESCRIBE YOUR PROJECT,YOU STILL MUST SUMMARIZE THE PROPOSED WORK HERE. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. Installation of a stormwater discharge to Hood Canal.The entire project will be located above the line or ordinary high water and will consist of a stormwater collection system on the uplands,a tightline pipe down the slope,and an energy dissipater located just above the line of ordinary high water as shown on the attached plans. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: SEE SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUAUTY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE,BUT THESE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAYBE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 7b. DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND WHY YOU WANT OR NEED TO PERFORM IT AT THE SITE. PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE DESIGN. Discharge of stormwater directly to marine water is required as a condition of a variance.The tightiine pipe and energy dissipater is necessary to avoid erosion. 7c. DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE,WATER QUALITY,WATER SUPPLY, RECREATION,and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID,MINIMIZE,AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS,AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION OF FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE. IDENTIFY WHICH GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS YOU HAVE USED. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. This project was designed to minimize impacts to marine waters.There will be visual impacts(the energy dissipater will be visible from the beach)and there may be minor impacts such as noise during construction. fiuG 2 6 2005 L_ ; 7d. FOR IN WATER CONSTRUCTION WORK WILL YOUR PROJECT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WA MODALITY STANDARQS FOR TURBIDITY WAC 173.201A-110? O YES NO (SEE USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS) 8.WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES? Will be continuous construction on a dry day with no rain forecast until erosion control measures are in place. O YES CO NO PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Summer of 2006 or 2007 ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY: 10-12 hours in vicinity of marine waters 9.CHECK IF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED: Not Applicable O WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAL WATERS;AND/OR OWATERWARD OF MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS 10.WILL FILL MATERIAL(ROCK FILL,BULKHEAD,OR OTHER MATERIAL)BE PLACED: Not applicable JARPA,Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version,360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 2 ❑WAT,?RWAR6 OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS? No IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) /AREA (ACRES) ❑WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAL WATERS? No IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) AREA (ACRES) 11.WILL MATERIAL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS? ❑YES ISINO IF YES: A IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES: B. HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO C. HAS A WETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO D. TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAL(E.G.,SAND,ETC.): E. MATERIAL SOURCE: F. LIST ALL SOIL SERIES(TYPE OF SOIL)LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE,&INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTY'S LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS.SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(NRCS): G. WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? ❑YES ❑NO IF YES,IMPACTED AREA IS_ACRES OFDRAINED WETLANDS. NOTE: If your project will impact greater than.4 of an acre of wetland,submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval along with the JARPA form NOTE:a 401 water quality certification will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project impacts wetlands that are: a)greater than 14 acre in size,or b)tidal wetlands or wetlands adjacent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA form and mitigation plan to Ecology for an individual 401 certification if a)orb)applies. 12. STORMWATER COMPLIANCE FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS ONLY: THIS PROJECT IS(OR WILL BE)DESIGNED TO MEET ECOLOGY'S MOST CURRENT STORMWATER MANUAL,OR AN ECOLOGY APPROVED LOCAL STORMWATER MANUAL ❑YES ❑NO IF YES—WHICH MANUAL WILL YOUR PROJECT BE DESIGNED TO MEET If NO—FOR CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 AND 404 PERMITS ONLY PLEASE SUBMIT TO ECOLOGY FOR APPROVAL, ALONG WITH THIS JARPA APPLICATION,DOCUMENTATION THAT DEMONSTRATES THE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM YOUR PROJECT OR ACTIVITY WILL COMPLY WITH THE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS,WAC 173.201(A) 13.WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS? ❑YES ONO IF YES: A VOLUME: (CUBIC YARDS)/AREA (ACRES) B. COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED: C. DISPOSAL SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAL: D. METHOD OF DREDGING: 14.HAS THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)BEEN COMPLETED? Not Applicable ❑ YES ❑NO SEPA LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County SEPA DECISION: DNS,MDNS,EIS,ADOPTION,EXEMPTION DECISION DATE(END OF COMMENT PERIOD):_DNS_ SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION 15.LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS,APPROVALS,OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTION,DISCHARGES,OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION(I.E.,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,HEALTH DISTRICT APPROVAL,BUILDING PERMIT,SEPA REVIEW,FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE(FERC),FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION,ETC.)ALSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE ALL EXISTING WORK ON DRAWINGS. NOTE:FOR USE WITH CORPS NATIONWIDE PERMITS,IDENTIFY WHETHER YOUR PROJECT HAS OR WILL NEED AN NPDES PERMIT FOR DISCHARGING WASTEWATER AND/OR STORMWATER, TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETED? NO. Septic System Jefferson County Health Department None assigned yet. August,2004 Stormwater Management Jefferson County Planning None assigned yet. August,2004 Building Permit Jefferson County Building None assigned yet. August,2004 16.HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTIVITY YOU'RE APPLYING FOR OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN?❑YES x NO IF YES,EXPLAIN: JARPA, Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version,360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 3 SECTI&N B-Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only: ,17a. TOTAL COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT,INCLUDING MATERIALS,LABOR,MACHINE RENTALS,ETC. 17b. IF A PROJECT OR ANY PORTION OF A PROJECT RECEIVES FUNDING FROM A FEDERAL AGENCY,THAT AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESA CONSULTATION. PLEASE INDICATE IF YOU WILL RECEIVE FEDERAL FUNDS AND WHAT FEDERAL AGENCY IS PROVIDING THOSE FUNDS. SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR INFORMATION ON ESA"" FEDERAL FUNDINIG 0 YES ONO IF YES,PLEASE LIST THE FEDERAL AGENCY 18.LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION: 19.FOR CORPS,COAST GUARD,AND DNR PERMITS,PROVIDE NAMES,ADDRESSES,AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES,ETC... PLEASE NOTE: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE—CONSULT YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER SECTION C-This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application 20.APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE,COMPLETE,AND ACCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE,THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED,IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WORK. I AGREE TO START WORK ONLY AFTER ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. SIGNATURE F APPLICANT DATE a asl°S SIGNA URE OF AUTHGEN DATE DATE I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that: Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline,such as marine,stream, lake,lagoon, marsh,bog,swamp,flood plain,floodway,delta;type of beach,such as accretion,erosion,high bank,low bank,or dike;material such as sand,gravel, mud,clay, rock,riprap;and extent and type of bulkheading,if any) B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level,indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units,existing and potential,that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance,set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use,or, in the case of a variance,from which the variance is being sought: These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions. JARPA,Revised 7/02 Contact the State of Washington Office of Permit Assistance for latest version, 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043 4 • NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. �" -- A JLS GROUP COMPANY ,er 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98382 Engineers Land Surveyors Geologists NI, Construction Inspection Materials Testing (380)452-8491 FAX 452-8498 www.nti4u.com E-Mail:info@nti4u.com JLS GROUP, INC. July 7, 2005 Gary& Betty Greene c/a Finne Architects 217 Pine St. Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Geotechnical Observations of Hand Dug Test Pits for Foundation Design, Tax Parcel#'s 821151005 & 821151006, Located in Section 15, T28N, R1 E, W.M. Jefferson County, WA Dear Mr. & Mrs. Greene: Per our proposal letter dated April 21,2005, we have completed the geotechnical inspection and staking of the house, garage and bridge. The location of the garage was moved to the south side of the property after the surveyors had been to the site and staked it at the north side of the property, thus the garage stakes are no longer accurate. The test pit for the garage was located approximately by pacing off of existing features shown on the site plan. Five hand-dug test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 4' using posthole diggers in the proposed location of the house, garage and bridge.abutments. The test pits were very similar, with about one foot of topsoil over sandy soil. The upper two to three feet of soil contained roots and rootlets. The soil became harder at about three feet. There was some mottling of the soil suggesting seasonal perched water, and there was water at a depth of—2.4' in the garage test pit which was dug near the east side of the garage, which is an area of fill according to the site plan. The postholes were left open and stakes were placed in the holes for future reference if needed. To prepare the site to receive foundations, we recommend stripping off vegetation, topsoil, roots and other deleterious material. The subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition. Loose areas should be compacted to a firm unyielding condition or over-excavated and replaced with properly placed and compacted structural fill or otherwise stabilized in order to achieve the desired condition. The on site sandy soil can be used for structural fill provided that deleterious material is removed. Preparation for placement of structural fill should include the removal of vegetation, topsoil and other deleterious material under the proposed fill areas. Imported structural fill should conform to the specifications for Gravel Backfill for Foundations listed in Section 9-03.12(1) of the 2004 WSDOT Standard Specifications, or similar material subject to approval of the engineer. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not to exceed 8"thick, with each lift being compacted to.at least 95%of the modified proctor value, at 1 near optimum moisture content. Compaction testing should be performed in order to verify that proper compaction is being achieved. NTI can perform this service if requested. For spread and continuous footings, the recommended allowable foundation pressure for the native sandy soil is 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) at a minimum depth of 12 inches below finish grade and a minimum footing width of 12". Local codes should be checked for required footing depth for frost protection. The lateral bearing of this soil is 150 lbs. psf%ft of depth below natural grade. These values may be increased by 1/3 when considering load combinations, including wind or earthquake loads. The lateral sliding coefficient of this soil is 0.25, to be multiplied by the dead load. It is also recommended that the ground around the house be sloped to drain away from the structure. Footing drains are also recommended, but should not be connected to roof drains. Limitations This report has been prepared exclusively for your use in conjunction with the above referenced project. The report has not been prepared for use by others or for other locations. Others may use it only with the express written permission of the Engineer. Within the limits of scope, schedule and budget,this report was prepared in general accordance with accepted professional engineering and geological principles and practices in this or similar. localities at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The observations, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report were based on our visual observations of the subject property at the time of our site visit; no laboratory tests were performed. Soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between test holes and/or surface outcrops. if there is.a substantial lapse of time, conditions at the site have changed or appear different than those described in this report,NTI should be contacted and retained to evaluate the,changed conditions and make modifications of this report if necessary. Sincerely, .._.---1 to A. lF NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC--- _ __ �O�'� o�y'icy \Y� 13772 / / if e2„,,e< oft , .. , 0 1'4,'° \ I S TEti �Robert A Leach, P.E., MBA _ 40 Principal Engineer � onAL �� ��.... EXPIRES 12130/2006 (3( .1 aft Bill Payton, L.E.G. o,~. _ s� Engineering Geologist ;,.,ui ,Iir ; a i' �" �i �...- "' / I .. 7 l e 5.S , 't' w,rM ; 4„G:1Gen1Bf111Reports\GREG0501.test pits for foundation.15(28-1 E).Tala Shores.doc ` 1 91 ,/.� i` . c.S' William C. Payton Jr. . 2 expires 11/06/05 •41- NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. r A JLS GROUP COMPANY 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 ❑ Engineers ❑Land Surveyors ❑ Geologists NTi ❑ Construction Inspection ❑Materials Testing (360)452-8491 FAX 452-8498 www.nti4u.com E-Mail:info @nti4u.com JLS GROUP, INC. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT For Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006 Located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for GARY and BETTY GREENE Prepared by NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 717 S. Peabody Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Phone 360-452-8491 Fax 360-452-8498 • E-mail info @nti4u.com November 18, 2002 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT For Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006 November 18, 2002 Gary and Betty Greene 7962 Grand Ave. Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Subject: . Geotechnical report for Tax Parcel #'s 821151005 & 821151006, located in Section 15, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, W.M., Jefferson County, WA Dear Mr. and Mrs. Greene: Introduction At your request, Bill Payton, geologist with Northwestern Territories, Inc. (NTI) conducted a geotechnical inspection of the above referenced property on October 11, 2002. It is understood that the property is being considered for purchase and that the report will be used to satisfy the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code for Geotechnical Reports should the property be purchased. It is our understanding that development plans for the property include the construction of a 2,400 square foot house about 50 feet back from the edge of the bluff (not including decks or patios) and a garage with upstairs office/gym to be located about 35 feet west of the house. Site Description The subject property is located on Tala Shore Drive south of Port Ludlow. The property is bounded on the north and south by developed residential property, on the west by Tala Shore Drive and on the east by a marine bluff and Hood Canal. The property is heavily wooded with young to mature trees and dense underbrush. There are small hills, gullies and depressions on the property with a stream channel running southward across the east portion of the lot. The stream channel was dry at the time of the site visit. The property generally slopes gently towards the east and south. The bluff at the property is also heavily vegetated with trees and brush, and no bare areas were visible. Some of the trees on the bluff face had curved trunks, which suggests that minor slope creep of the surface soils is occurring. The height of the bluff was measured to be about 60 feet high with an average slope of 47 degrees from horizontal. At the time of the site visit, it appeared that recent high tides were not reaching the toe of the bluff. However, winter high tides and storm tides probably do reach the toe of the bluff. No evidence of seeps or springs were noticed on the bluff face. 2 A 12 inch culvert passes beneath Tala Shore Drive and discharges onto the property. This discharge occurs in an area designated for septic disposal and should be redirected along Tala Shore Dr. southerly to an existing drainage easement that leads to the shore. Removal of this water from the site will not only aid the septic system but will also reduce the amount of water reaching the cross-property stream bed or the bluff face. Site Geology The USDA Soil Survey of Jefferson County maps the soil at the property as the Cassolary-Kitsap Complex (CkD). This soil is described as having formed in reworked glacial, lacustrine or marine sediments. Further descriptions classify this soil as predominantly a silty sand with some gravel with a clay seam from about 23" to 38". The Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington describes the soil at the subject property as the Vashon lodgement till (Qvt1), a compact mixture of boulders, cobbles, pebbles, sand, silt and clay, generally overlain by 1-5 feet of ablation till. The Atlas also describes this soil as being excellent for foundation stability and good for seismic stability. The Atlas maps the slope stability of the property as Stable (S) and as Unstable (U). Visual observations made in one of the septic test pits revealed deposits of silty sand with gravel down to about four feet. Conclusions and Recommendations The bluff at the subject property appears grossly stable at present. The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50 feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the structure. Marine erosion is a fact of life along most of the Puget Sound shoreline. Periodic shallow slides and occasional downed trees on the bluff should be expected in the future even though the bluff is currently stable. The following recommendations should be considered with regards to development of the subject property in order to reduce negative impact to the bluff: 1. Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maintained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most beneficial. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 2. If beach access stairs are desired, they could probably be designed and 3 constructed in order to minimize negative impact to the bluff. Disturbed areas would need to be revegetated after construction and erosion from runoff would have to be controlled. An engineer with experience in this type of construction should be consulted. 3. Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 4. Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 5. Septic drain fields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 6. All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 7. Silt fences or other sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 8. An engineered drainage control plan should be developed for this property to address items 4, 6 and 7. 9. Relocate off site drainage to allow septic system development. Based on the findings, recommendations and limitations of this report: 1. There has probably been landslide activity on the bluff face in the past. However, no evidence of recent landslide activity was noticed. The recommended setback distance should provide for minimal landslide hazard to the proposed home. 2. An analysis of slope stability indicates that the proposed home would not be subject to risk of landslide under normal conditions. 3. The proposal would not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties. 4. The proposal would not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. 5. The proposed homesite would be stable under normal geologic conditions. 4 For further information please review the three pamphlets, which are enclosed with the original of this report, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology entitled: "Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using Vegetation", "Surface Water and Groundwater on Coastal Bluffs" and "Vegetation Management: A Guide for Puget Sound Bluff Property Owners". Limitations This report is based on a visual inspection of the existing site conditions. No scientific measurements, tests or calculations were performed. The findings and report are limited to the normal standard of care of the industry for an investigation without benefit of scientific data and calculations. The sole objective of this investigation has been to diagnose the geotechnical conditions at the site. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client in conjunction with the above mentioned project. It may be used by others only with expressed written permission of the Engineer. The observations, interpretations, and conclusions herein are based on generally accepted professional engineering and geologic principles and practice. This warranty is in lieu of all others, either expressed or implied. Sincerely, NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. Q)�R�A. �. 4 O pF Wgs61 C' / - ,,e, Robert A. Leach, P.E., MBA -01, 'PF 13772 �o 4,- Principal Design Engineer ox. cisTER 4� FSS�%NAL ENG� EXPIRES 12/30/2002 -73/ ,,(2 ______—_, , . . _ _ ...._ 4, it i Bill Payton, L.E.G. 0, .:. Engineering Geologist Willi ern C. Payton Jr. G:\Gen\Bill\Reports\GREG0202.bluffstability2.15(28-1E).Tala Shore Expires 11-06-03 5 • R Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal 48 Department of De FISH and WILDLIFE RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA vonshire Road 98563 (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15, 2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PERMITTEE AUTHORI•T- 9 ORR /CONTRACTOR Gary Greene V �� 2242 NW Market Street,#166 Seattle,WA 98107 206-794-2794( ) JEFFERSON common!D� Project Name: Greene Tale Shores Septic Crossing Project Description: Septic and Water Utility Crossing of a Type NS Stream. PROVISIONS I 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006; Provided: work below the ordinary high water mark occurs between June 1st and November 15th unless the Area Habitat Biologist listed below approves working outside of these dates due the presence of a completely dry stream channel. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Area Habitat Biologist listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than 3 working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 3. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Enforcement Sergeant listed below shall receive written notification (FAX or mail)from the person to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is issued (permittee)or the agent/contractor no less than three working days prior to start of work, and again within seven days of completion of work to arrange for a compliance inspection. The notification shall include the permittee's name, project location, starting date for work or completion date of work, and the control number for this HPA. 4. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Septic System, Parcel #821151005 & 006 Stream Crossing Detail for Gary Greene and dated August 13, 2005, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. Septic and Waterline Installation Provisions: 5. Conduit alignment shall be as nearly perpendicular to the stream as possible. . 6. The conduit shall be installed at sufficient depth so that the conduit cannot become exposed . during future streambed scouring. • Page 1 of 5 ., Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Sr Department of 48 Devonshire Road , FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 7. When using trench excavation, the trenches shall be excavated in the dry or shall be isolated from the flowing stream. Plowing, placement, and covering shall occur in a single pass of the equipment. Disturbance of the streambed as a result of the plowing operation shall be limited to the amount necessary to complete the project. 8. Trenches shall be backfilled with native material removed during the trench excavation, and the streambed shall be returned to preproject condition. 9. The conduit approach trench shall be isolated from the stream until laying of the conduit across the stream occurs. Temporary Streamflow Bypass Provisions (if necessary): 10. A temporary bypass to divert flow around the work area shall be in place prior to initiation of other work in the wetted perimeter. 11. The bypass shall be of sufficient size to pass all flows and debris for the duration of the project. 12. Prior to releasing the water flow to the project area, all conduit installation shall be completed. 13. Upon completion of the project, all material used in the temporary bypass shall be removed from the site and the site returned to preproject or improved conditions. Equipment Provisions: 14. Equipment used for this project may operate below the ordinary high water line, provided the drive mechanisms (wheels, tracks, tires, etc.) shall not enter or operate below the ordinary high water line. 15. Equipment used for this project shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities along the stream. Water Quality Provisions: 16. Erosion control methods shall be used to prevent silt-laden water from entering the stream. 17. All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt or overburden resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water in an approved upland disposal site. Page 2 of 5 r. ;:4 ' Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal • Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 18. If high flow conditions that may cause siltation are encountered during this project, work shall stop until the flow subsides. 19. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, fresh cement, sediments, sediment-laden water, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the stream. Re-vegetation Provision: 20. Alteration or disturbance of the bank and bank vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calender days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using vegetation or other means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. Vegetative cuttings shall be planted at a maximum interval of three feet (on center) and maintained as necessary for three years to ensure 80 percent survival. PROJECT LOCATIONS Location#1 Greene Residence WORK START: September 06, 2005 (WORK END: November 15, 2006 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 17.0189 Unnamed Tributary 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NE 1/4 15 28 N 01 E N 47.91749 W 122.65461 . Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions • APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to the provisions of the Washington State Fisheries and Wildlife Code, specifically RCW 77.55(formerly RCW 75.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local, state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to secure any landowner permissions or use authorizations as needed for the project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable • for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one Page 3 of 5 i Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal ' Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September 01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15,2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A hundred dollars per day or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.100 or 77.55.200 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.110 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER,that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.170. CHAPTER 77.55 RCW RE-CODIFIED: Chapter 77.55 RCW was re-organized and re-codified by the 2005 Legislature in Second Substitute House Bill 1346, signed into law by Governor Gregoire as Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 became effective July 24,2005. The Code Reviser's Office is in the process of completing the re-codification and conversion of the bill into RCW. The RCW referenced at the top of this HPA has been superseded by Chapter 146, Laws of 2005. Until the re- codification process has been completed,the following reflects the section(s)of Chapter 146, Laws of 2005 under which sections of former Chapter 77.55 RCW can now be found: FORMER CHAPTER 146 TITLE 77.55 RCW LAWS of 2005 RCW 77.55.010 Sec.406 RCW 77.55.100 Sec. 101,201, 301, 507, 508, 601,605 RCW 77.55.110 Sec. 101,201 RCW 77.55.150 Sec. 101, 303,401 RCW 77.55.200 Sec. 501 RCW 77.55.210 Sec. 504 RCW 77.55.220 Sec. 101, 502 RCW 77.55.270 Sec. 101,402 RCW 77.55.280 Sec.403 RCW 77.55.290 Sec. 505 . APPEALS INFORMATION IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL THE ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF,OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL,THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-340)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100, 77.55.110, 77.55.140, 77.55.190,77.55.200, and 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval;or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30-days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party, and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached,or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Environmental Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal,a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS(WAC 220-110-350)OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.100 Page 4 of 5 s,, t Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.100-Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: September01,2005 Control Number: 102795-1 Project Expiration Date: November 15, 2006 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A OR 77.55.140: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B)An order imposing civil penalties;or (C)Any other'agency action'for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL'and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia,Washington 98501-1091, within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. if there has been an informal appeal,the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.110, 77.55.200, 77.55.230, or 77.55.290: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval,or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, Lacey,Washington 98504; telephone 360/459-6327. D. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 43.21 L RCW: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The FORMAL APPEAL shall be in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21 L RCW and Chapter 199-08 WAC. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board at Environmental Hearings Office, Environmental and Land Use Hearings Board,4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two-Rowe Six, P.O. Box 40903, Lacey,Washington 98504;telephone 360/459-6327. E. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF ALL APPEAL RIGHTS. IF THERE IS NO TIMELY REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL, THE DEPARTMENT ACTION SHALL BE FINAL AND UNAPPEALABLE. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Henry ( ) P3 Jeff Davis 360-895-3965 ` for Director Habitat Biologist WDFW CC: Stacie Hoskins, Jefferson County DCD Ted Labbe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Natural Resources Dept. Page 5 of 5 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDI(JFE,__ BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN RCW 77.12.655 WAC 232-12-292 JAN I 2 2006 EAGLE TERRITORY: Tala Point #689 Applicant Property Gary and Betty Greene Tax Parcels#821151005 and #821151006, 2442 NW Market St., #166 Township 28 North, Range 1 East, Section 15, Seattle, WA 98107 SE V4 of NE 1/4,Jefferson County. Pending Activity Residential development: Installation of a driveway and septic system. Construction of a single- family residence and detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit. FACTORS CONSIDERED 1) Landowners goals were considered through a review of proposed site development. One site visit was conducted on the property with the landowners in 2002. They were previously notified that a Bald Eagle Management Plan would be required for the property. During the site visit recommendations were made to allow development p while protecting the significant eagle habitat on the property. No finalized site development plan was reviewed during this initial meeting. The finalized site development plan was recently provided with a copy of the Master Permit Application. A few phone conversations were conducted with the landowners to review the proposed development. 2) Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through time, current surrounding habitat conditions, a review of other eagle plans developed for the territory, and the current status of the population and scientific literature concerning bald eagle habitat protection. BACKGROUND The Tala Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory is located in Jefferson County, east of Port Ludlow along the Hood Canal(Figure 1). The recent history of the Tala Point territory has been one of conversion from a semi-remote timbered peninsula to a increasingly subdivided area where a. considerable portion of the suitable bald eagle habitat has been altered by timber clearing and residential development. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)has been monitoring this territory since 1983. A total of four different nest trees have been documented in the territory(Figure 2). Nest tree#1 is located on the eastern side of Tala Point, 4000 feet south of the northern tip of the point. The nest tree is 600 feet west of the shoreline along the Hood Canal. This nest was first reported in 1983. The nest tree is a grand fir tree that was reported as dying. The nest produced two young in 1983 and one young in 1990. During the windstorms in December 1990, the top of the tree broke off below the multiple top. Landowners in the area reported an osprey nested in the tree in 1989 and there appeared to be competition between the osprey and eagles for the nest site during 1990. A nest structure did exist on the broken top of Nest Tree#1. An osprey pair nested in this nest during the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons. Nest Tree#2 is located approximately 300 feet south and slightly east of Nest Tree#1. This nest was also reported in 1983. This nest was located in the top of a Douglas fir tree. A total of seven young were produced in this nest from 1984 to 1992. During the annual survey for eagle activity on April 14, 1993 the nest was no longer present in the tree. In September 1995, nearby landowners reported observing new sticks in this tree. During the April 1996 aerial survey a new nest occupied by a pair of osprey was documented in this tree. Nest Tree#3 was discovered on the western side of Tala Point during the 1993 aerial survey. This nest was located on the top of a double-topped grand fir tree which is within 100 feet of two houses which had been recently constructed. No young were produced at the nest during the 1993 nesting season. During the 1994 and 1995 nesting seasons a single young eaglet was produced in this nest tree each year. An adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on this nest on April 13, 1996 but it was later confirmed that the eagles failed at their nesting attempt. This nest has been destroyed and there is currently only a few recant sticks remaining in the tree. The Tala Point bald eagle pair constructed Nest#4 prior to the 1997 nesting season. This nest was documented during an aerial survey conducted in April of 1997. The nest tree is located on the west side of Tala Point, approximately .7 miles northwest of the location of Nest Tree#2. This nest is located along the shoreline in a dominant broken-topped Douglas fir tree. The WDFW observed an adult bald eagle in incubation posture on this nest during the 1997 aerial survey. One young was produced at the nest during the 1997 nesting season. The WDFW documented that the bald eagle pair had failed at their nesting attempts at Nest#4 for the 1998 and 1999 nesting seasons. The eagles were confirmed nesting in Nest#4 during the 2000 nesting season. On Jun 15, 2000 it was confirmed by WDFW that one eaglet was successfully produced at the nest. During the 2001 and 2002 nesting seasons,Nest #4 was documented as the active nest. Two young were documented in the nest during the 2001 season. Due to funding constraints the WDFW was unable to conduct an aerial survey in June of 2002 so the number of young produced at the nest for this season is unknown. No aerial survey of the territory was conducted in 2003 so it is unknown if the eagle pair actively nested at Nest #4 once again. During a site visit to the area in 2003, the WDFW observed that a few new sticks were located in the tree, which previously contained Nest #3. The landowners who live on the property have reported seeing adult bald eagles occasionally at this nest tree. The nesting activity for the 2004 season is unknown. During an aerial survey conducted on April 5, 2005, an adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on Nest#4. Two adult eagles were also observed perched on a recently repaired Nest #2. This observation confirms that there are two eagle pairs occupying the Tala Point area. The WDFW Data Systems staff has been notified to split the Tala Point Territory into two distinct territories. The east side of the point, containing Nest #2, will be referred to the Tala Shores Bald Eagle territory in the future. Productivity surveys were not conducted this season so the number of young produced at Nest#4 is unknown. The osprey pair was observed on their nest within the Tala Shores Territory later in April so it is believed tithe bald eagle-pair:- - abandoned their nesting attempt at Nest #2 for the 2005 season. ` > jt.° 1 2005 Gary and Betty Greene own two high bank waterfront parcels of property within the documented Tala Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory(Figure 3). They purchased each.66-acre parcel on the east side of Tala Point in 2002. During the process of the feasibility study for the property they were referred to the Department of Fish and Wildlife for consultation about a Bald Eagle Management Plan. Consultation with WDFW took place prior to the actual purchase of the property. A site visit was conducted on the property. Specific conditions of the management plan were discussed in coordination with review of the proposed site development. The parcels are located southeast of the tree which contains the documented bald eagle Nest Tree#2. The nest tree is approximately 384 feet from the west property line(Figure 3). The nest tree is visible from some locations of the Greene property. The lot presently contains a mix of mostly conifer trees with a small component of hardwoods. Some large mature Douglas fir and grand fir trees conifer trees are present on the property. There is fairly dense under story vegetation throughout the entire property. Important bald eagle perching habitat has been documented along the shoreline of the property. Other significant eagle habitat that exists on the property includes the buffering habitat around the nest tree and all remaining screening vegetation between the nest tree and any proposed home location. There is a documented creek that is located within the eastern portion of the property. The landowners have obtained all required permits to construct a bridge over this creek. WDFW Habitat Biologist Jeff Davis was present during the site visit conducted in 2002 to provide recommendation for protection of the creek. The Greene property presently contains no existing structures. The landowners now intend to initiate plans for development of the property. They have submitted a Master Permit Application to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development and will soon be submitting for septic and building permits. They propose to install a new septic system along the western property line (Figure 4). They propose to install a driveway on the property that will initiate from Tala Shores Drive in the northwest corner of the property and will terminate at a parking area located just west of the bridge (Figure 5). The proposed driveway and septic drainfield have been located to avoid the removal of all conifers, with the exception of one small western hemlock tree. Mr. and Mrs. Greene are proposing to construct a 2-bedroom single-family residence on the property just east of the creek(Figure 5). The residence is located approximately 614 feet from the nest tree. They will also be constructing a detached garage with a 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit above this garage structure. This building is proposed for construction directly south of the parking area and is located approximately 530 feet southeast of the documented nest tree (Figure 5). The landowners and consulting engineers have proposed a site development plan that requires minimal tree removal on the property. They followed the WDFW recommendation to conduct a tree survey of the property and have situated proposed development to protect as many trees as possible on the site. Very few significant trees will need to be removed for installation of the homesite and garage. A total of 5 conifer trees will need to be removed for construction of the residence. Fortunately, only one of the larger mature conifer trees on the property, a 24-inch western red cedar, will have to be removed for the proposed development. A small alder tree is the only tree that will need to be removed for construction of the detached garage. Significant mature conifer trees along the shoreline and within the southern 1/3 of the property will be retained. The landowners intend to obtain permits for Ow septic system installation and construction of the garage w/ADU in the next few months. They will commence • these development activities in the Spring/Summer of 2006. The primary residence will be constructed at a later time in the future. The intent of this plan is to allow for the proposed development of the Greene property while maintaining the long-term integrity of the documented Tala Point Bald Eagle Territory. A concern of the WDFW is the protection of the buffering habitat around the nest tree,bald eagle perching habitat, and potential alternate nest trees which exist on the property. Previous land clearing in the area may have removed valuable buffering habitat around the nest tree and known bald eagle perch trees or potential nest trees. The clearing could have also increased the risk of blow-down to the nest tree and adjacent significant habitat. Timing restrictions will be recommended to minimize disturbance during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season only if an active bald eagle nest is documented within 800 feet of the proposed development project. The planting of conifer seedlings will insure replacement trees for habitat previously removed, along with providing supplemental buffering of the nest tree and future bald eagle habitat. The landowners have exhibited a desire to protect the local eagle pair and the significant bald eagle habitat that is located on the property. CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to protect bald eagles and their habitat: 1) The proposal to install a septic system on the property, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 4). 2) The proposal to construct a driveway and a new 2-bedroom residence, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 5). 3) The proposal to construct a detached garage with an 1-bedroom Additional Dwelling Unit, as shown on the site development plan, shall be allowed(Figure 5). 4) All trees shall be retained on the property except for those trees in the path of the driveway, building/garage envelope, and septic system. All trees proposed for removal on the property are shown on attached Figure 5. 5) The proposal to remove understory vegetation and selected trees within the areas proposed for development shown on Figure 5 shall be allowed. All clearing shall be in compliance with Jefferson County regulations, the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, and the Hydraulics permit developed for the property. 6) The selective removal/trimming of understory vegetation, the selective removal of hardwood trees, and the limbing of conifer trees shall be allowed to achieve and maintain water views in the future. No more than 30%of the live crown of a conifer tree shall be removed. 7) Danger trees may be removed if trees are identified as hazardous by a professional forester or certified arborist. A written report from the forester/arborist must be submitted to the WDFW before approval to remove the hazard trees is granted. A tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals may be removed without a report. 8) It is recommended that no heavy equipment operation,clearing, tree cutting, outside home construction, or burning shall occur during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 -August 15 of any given year. Timing restrictions shall not be required for a given year if it may be determined that the eagle pair are not actively nesting at the nest or within 800 feet of the property. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1,then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys to determine nesting status must be conducted by a qualified biologist. * Special note: The WDFW is no longer requiring timing restrictions but has requested that the landowner work cooperatively to minimize disturbance during the nesting season. The landowner shall contact WDFW if any heavy equipment work or outside construction activities are proposed during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season. The landowner and WDFW shall develop a plan to minimize disturbance and potential impacts to the eagles. 9) The WDFW recommends no discharge of firearms, fireworks, or explosives during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 -August 15 of any given year. 10) A total of two dozen(24) live conifer tree seedlings shall be established on the property. The seedlings shall be: - At least 2.0 age class. - A mix of Douglas fir, grand fir, and western red cedar. - Planted within one year of home completion. - At least 12 of the conifer seedlings shall be planted within the NW portion of the property to supplement screening of the nest from proposed development. Other seedlings shall be planted in areas determined by the landowner. 11) No further subdivision of the property shall be allowed. JUSTIFICATION The landowners were granted approval to develop property located within 400 feet of an identified bald eagle nest tree due to the fact that the tree containing Nest#2 is located on the adjacent property. The WDFW recognizes that the landowner be granted reasonable use of the property. The WDFW worked closely with the landowner to minimize impacts of proposed development. The landowner has agreed to comply with recommended timing restrictions to minimize disturbance to nesting eagles. The landowner has made a diligent effort to minimize tree removal on the property and will be planting conifer seedlings to improve screening and provide future bald eagle habitat. DURATION OF PROTECTION This plan applies to the landowner who signs the plan. If the ownership changes, the new landowner may sign the plan or request a new one to reflect a change in land use. Since eagles return to the same traditional use areas each year,the conditions of this plan shall apply indefinitely unless a breeding territory has been unoccupied by a breeding pair of bald eagles for 5 consecutive years. If the breeding territory is unoccupied by a bald eagle pair for 5 consecutive years,then the WDFW biologist and the landowner should evaluate the continued need for protection of the bald eagle habitat. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1, then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys shall be done b y a qualified wildlife biologist. Please contact the WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do not assume that the conditions of this plan no longer apply. REVIEW AND AMENDMENT This plan will be subject to the following review and amendment procedures. The plan may be reviewed periodically by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) to determine whether: 1)the plan requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances; or, 2) the terms of the plan comply with applicable laws and regulations; or, 3) the parties to the plan are complying with its terms. APPEAL PROCEDURE In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292(7.1)-(7.3), the landowner may request a formal appeal of WDFW actions according to the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW, and the Model Rules of Procedure, Chapter 10.08 WAC. Such a request shall be filed with the Department within 20 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal request shall clearly state the relief sought and the grounds for the appeal. COMPLIANCE Failure to comply with this plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. However, compliance with this plan does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal, state or local laws. This plan applies only to the proposed land use listed above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the landowner's responsibility to notify the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)of any new proposed land use activities. Plan.drafted by Shelly Ament, Wildlife Biologist, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 1933, Sequim, WA. 98382. (360) 681-4276. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH and WILDLIFE Bald Eagle Site Management Agreement On behalf of the people of the State of Washington,to which its wildlife belongs,the following agreement is hereby enacted for the purpose of protecting Bald eagles and their habitats. The Landowners and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife agree to the conservation measures described in the attached Site Management Plan. Site Name: Tala Point #689 Legal Description of proposed project: T28N, R1E, Section 15 The undersigned hereby agree to the terms of the Bald Eagle Site Management Plan. 1)/ 1) GorY 91"/If' 2) 1 /0 0C 2) &Al °Yee &. andow er(Signature) Date Landown ir(Print) Nabliaide Jf Phone Number Address cie2 2, Lt24 ci.F/O7, City, State, Zip The State of Washington,Department of Fish and Wildlife Qa,c/e a`'. 1/4/0 6 6-Regional Program Manager Date dizel4 £til 1-6.06 Tegefson. WildlifoMiologist Date Region County a . Priority Inspected By Date 11 1 550 R 1 E "fmm.y..,' = _ _ ,....., -.- .,-..orY. "!M 1P-"I'•;--P4.!;-`-'-'1.-:-:,------41:iti VS,,_ ' • R 1 W 45':1 450 -,..d.,004:71.;--.4., fc 111 •7 - ,, ,.,„-:- ,, .--- A ' A' , .A, ''..;A"Z'''42Vi'rr:IArcrtIn- Ae.. }''''',,,..*,1!ir-sr,1-„,, I.k.., . "'n'"""l ‘..."11114.1.1.1".aimmillui. .1.v.::.-.:.•':,' - ' • " ;".*---;;:."'.01 A-t-W. ''':',.; •'--t,' ' Lake -r,;' .i.'&,::.' ' -. ' ' - ,,,,'',,T - ' .:5-:2,' tr, ' ' - , - ' ' `'''' 21 I-41 iiiii „, 19 ert;i't::- - ' . -' '. ' ' • ''''' *`'-'•*/:i.,,,VTA:Zirii.441.st',744,4..,7-:,)`-z4 -_.,..i,-,'All OWL IN IIIP, \--';'::,- : - -:,-.. '.:---• : -,.,f-::.:::;._,=::t-IAffMg..-4,*„!'..:.:-;.;.;-„..- .,;;T:-'.'''-. if-,__ AMIabilipTgrr t :;,-::: .,13t!*-7, isti% t rU1 11 1 id 12119 ,,f * =CB 41j; ,--,..,„,,,,s,; ' - :`&:,,--;:,-''-',''::?..- .4`'-'-', 2 --C'•!`-,§,ilb.1-..=:::Sf-g-fliitr 44.717:: wilimpl■ AI ,-::,- ;1'Y V -‘1•41. _ r 4 4•Or II liroLk: ; '., • _Lc , , .1 for 1 • 111'4.'-'. ?,..,' A As ANAL- ‘311194ak I 1 ' -1--awarl'i A ' 17 7 0 1'4 1,itrr - -, ('''411:1.` .. ikvil .2 A, -Ir '17/' "' - -,4 ,01,_ 12 ..1:30 milt t'PP) ." ir 1.0' ;:i---7.414144 .mg...... .N ..1`, ' -. '- .,:.,`Ir'■ , ..,,,.,::7737,7i: 18 gir .k.i.,.."41, l'-'• . . 7"",, ,-ip, - .411a !II.' ,1711 p "7 al r ---4.. •Nli7.. . a.211111-c k4fril .;/?' ,-,•`;: ''' ::::',1A:.'''':::.^4:::::4I 117,4\11, rirti■iima"..7.7.---;11:‘°-(k‘ 11111111\ ,. ,,, , , -- 1 . 111 1 Ludlow b.k- 13 s•Ix Abk,,1%.4am• 16'ti... I I I I I ,. .fl..,;41:: ;; ;`A 1r,f!e,:i::, :::,:', ;,::-.,,,,:::::4,s 4.0:111) , 1 II; lk% &,- Ii 1 '11 tr3t5i.:,e;‘,3&1-_:,.:1':rax:1!"';F:'''1/414 .1/4. lit ill 1 • c . 1111141 Ilibk..% 'Mgr, Ill'i ■ 1111 ' ,'-'-',4i:kiiizii.'7.:*;,-.11,z7;,>:-',-,<:::, ,41-',.f,..1-w vcr .1 24 T j IlgAlligligliii0M5i * ViN2c-:.*: 41/11,1111111r 411 ''• iiiti, Hfr.s.esh.r_e i rorimr-■ i •4,ovr,,,,1417i Ft-,,,4-V., 25 .r..,'"•,.-7.'r•:- '--°-,r1-11:-' 4,11w....1r, 4\ ,47...,.--,.- --------, 111116._..... 1 ri IlippT imp F. .11, hull •, ,, iii , 1-111,Nzir:I•shr5e .AVIPOlhik' 3° I A Ailli.:. 111111 .,Andr , illorl il . C2 .,•,-1„,,,,,,gc-fielit: trftillt lillref -L .1 1 'r..*-4--,Tw423,4c7";41-, -:,v1.-,,-7.,i.--;„...,.-•5 P-4;4---'c",7,64t----4, ,.--..4,:•;),,-411,.F .,-,',' ,' 4 zygli ...,1112 ,1111 4 ,.-,-....1-1:-..-0,-;,,*:,-,-.•-,•-.„. ..;:e.',,,,-'-ro,,~z WIWI UN IIIIIIIIIIIIII 31 ''frk:,153.4.1`4;' 33 11111■1111111111111‘ I 36 ir 4 .,;., ,,,,oit,.. likre ,,, ,.. , , i t7gk*g..d.e :-,..N4:::;ir :,;----.0-,,1-4...: I ' 11111111111111141 -- 8 Nirl ‘c,-.,:-.:',-,:,.,„,,,,,,,fivii,iik,z,,-A9.1,-;:::..-.,:,1,-„,_„,,, ,--'44---v,„,,y-- -0,00..k iii. .. _I I ' '7 I 1"1(11173 ° . . _ ,. ._..,,,,,,,. . , .„-i,..-„s4r,..N.-4,4-ipoint,- ---8' AF,...10: — Iiiiia ,...tVIIIItrlig 6 .'..t't,;,•_,. ;•-' -:::::;=!•",'-1;:::'.:-::::;'-`-'4,r1:2'.;°:"4!"Y-9...41:=..-:;.;-.111 1 1 , ,440 w --, - -- --- -t-, ;;;---- *,•*,,:i?I';';;:,,,:,,k,-,..;tai ,. g, Jug!' 5-4 r-- F illak i 4. . .. .--.VII ' -::: ,'-,.'j,:t.,.-::':'S.;;-=''',„'4•:,;111-.;;.,:'''',IM j III* -'..''..,;R:_ 2 ' A illipmin c.,,Losi Hillnuloliv, *,'; Try,..,.... tA ir-AE6411111war 11114 -1,;:--f;!,71,-xte ‘0Alkti If `,6 ZAttdrio 3 i, cr or to - . . Lollii Agi dmit-tr--- -.--...,e7--,-,,,,,,-0--it,k lotim,..•• - . . -::),..•-•,,, 'z'f.;:i.-t, 1 -**4.4.--4,1, 1 { 'glin 1■ 'O.?'':---4,--- 4,2-- -Lr.,4','::' ''--,-;'-„,...,..&-',"fii ii\L 1 Pa I I I I I I 1162 Mb.4;1 t .,efz,i.4.1..1,:;411' :.-7!:::- ''n.i' 1111"11 rir- <46405Y§,i ',,:1:7,.:-:4;•,'S ;;;;taggil ■•4' -Wili 1 (DA!7. ) I .,-"Q-14):*1'411::6'.:.:P.**:41::ti44\914111111111F,7. WO .da'ick 25 30 r■- -a I cr ,,-.;, 4 1 ..„ „,,,--, ,-.., '', .*'WC;.17''''''31 '4' '':* ,, 1 , 1 "iiii33 - 3.:Vf-f AN, , FIGURE I. The location of the jTeffalearsPoon cintoBuanity ; Bald Eagle Nesting Territory • • . •4, ,.. -.run , rim u • • • i 1 1g Hill Rd ily Roy.A 11111" s‘ . ''''`V'' '''''' X■261g/111" .... t4;•*;..,'€::;7-''''t.Y.'"Sr-: 71.0i411%dr, ---1 J--A / '1:iiI7f;: . or 1 I REGION 6•IEA RSON COUNTY ANENT DELORNE ATLAS PG 78 A3 USGS QUAD 4712286 PORI'LUDLOW . TALA POINT BALD EAGLE TERRITORY(OCCURRENCE 689)AVASASLE• COMPARE THIS MAP TO YOURP PERSONALIREGI L LD MAP AND REPORT INCONSISTENCIES 525000 E 526000 E ... ,.:' - -I 1 Y.. ..;;;,.-7:cif_'.s.-_-7_,_-_-,--.1=-_==y,_,__ '\I/7a ,.. -,., ,o, q t.-,..:. ---,:y7:4;- : y .;:. , :-. ,,,ki. .._,_z.,.,, . . ... ..;,,g4....:,.....,,,, _::::....„. .._:-..„.,...t.:-... .--;7.:1-:-- -' -.., '- -� HALE 689- I} } # -,„ 0-3-4frog-',- ,--, ....7...., ,._...:„ „......9„ ,„:„.„,_....,.„.....,,„..„:...„.,. .i ,,,.41-144R-1-4,,,-,73-r` s''f' e; - ce.., ,-f', r-.'....,. ._.,„ . . f 7°'3' i6 } Rt.; •i:-,, `° 5 f 1 a ixy: r rai iE#i, .a it k wwvW N ! «i .tY "e- -1t 1141.,:' lk, _r J 4x=Y�;. i rte. -,. .rl$ _ - E - i -a�ie s a t HALE 689-4 ' R jl -• tq r ` lFir {gasr —_ 11. --;---...',.: .....j..---,:-:-_*1-:: ,--:: ,--,- -:-.-_ - --- ---_ -- -- . _ ._ -_ - _ iz--,:-":.__41-:**-W.:.:7.:--t;:"..1_.i:S21..?,-.;- Y ,.'t ,,y .71,r� HALE 689-7 -�=� ,� � �, . PAHA 928-1 4Ii + � * { fit- _ - 14131-r! y yi r� 3 :=;-,-....-::7-1:--:-- - - - '0 500 1000 MAP SCALE 1:12,000 YAP PROJECTKLN:STATE PLANE SOUTH DATUfui:NAD27 CONUS Tics:UTY ZONE 1d1 WHEN ADDNi 3 NEW LOCATIONS OR CORRECTING OLD LOCATIONS,PLEASE PARK TO SCAL EI FAT YOU ARE USBIG A GPS UNIT WRH THIS MAP,SET THE DATUM TO NAD2T COMM SOIJD LINE SHOWS PHS HABITAT POLYGON.POLYGON EXTENDS OUTSIDE DISPLAYED YAPEXTENI. 889-2 TALA POINT T28N R01 E S15 BALD EAGLE NEST,LOCATE S OF NEST#i ABOUT 110 Y IN TIP TOP OF LRG RAT TOPPED LAST OCCUPIED 18990825 AYENT,S.WDFW OGC DOUG RR JUST N OF WERE PAVBAENT ENDS ON W SIDE OF GRAVEL AND RECENT CLFAR- 47 55'12'122 39'11' UTM 525831 E 6307183 N NG.1883 NEST PARTULLLY BLOWN OUT. 888 3 U POINT 77��ggNN R01 E S10 BALD EAGLE NEST LOCATED IN T OF DBL TOP GRAND flp AT N END OF POIN OW W LAST OCCUPIED:18980610 / I+iT/YCAIILL OCCPROp SSE TREE}SON S;SIDE OF PSENTLY HEBiC;COITRtI 4755'44.122 '40' lRY 525380E 5308283 N NORitRN}aOg}, CTED.THIS IS NOW 8894 TALA PINT T28N 801E S15 BALD EAGLE NEST 5 i T R OY Toe 4766'1012239'5e 10618 AAAENT/QF;g�}�gN OAP FIR 100 FT Ri01A Siipl (SW SIDES OF TOpP®,FLAT-TOPPED MOE DOUe,- UTNi 525020 E6�7708 N PAHA 928 TALA PO NrOSPREY TERRITORY FIGURE 2. The location of the Tala Point bald eagle nest trees. _ .. • Figure 3 t6' 1.-Eiceur-,...44 ii1;176? L4"5$ 456( to WATE10 4 40 11.4.14 0“ TO At - "F, balet(OWN 11 I Lor ai,t , le, Twat/lux . .14p ,c,, , t LoT fr, .-- f5V 15-.- h Leir a , • (s",„„. ., , LE.. Or (1$) v.owl21.4 14" .Itgff-tio.u ** .. i.zr)44 .. ' Weir t*--........ ■ -.-.-. I 0 ''Zart■ereirz."..*..'^'..-........# — 1 1(t i v . t4 __ .,-.._ i _. • ., ....—_ __. ii • if CACIANAINI ---- .21/ce„..,,Arc, L. 7 711\ I --"=r7213/1..... =.-..r..._,,. ..4 49a I 14 ..,T, —...— -.. i 4 66 141i i"I I . ----...... ......—.........._______. , 0 - t l' Ltir a , , 't . L6z- CI • .. ...w. ,......, . .. ..'— I 4 14(00010€42 r- LOT A 1 . 41 NEST t..IimE)-((iil ...o v TREE #2 . ,i 41 . • Lar ( ) c- ...,,,. I-14z Atzip DV° 1 • r 6ur I.' 2.61-te:11.9 I 4 44uL.14 up 10 °, ,,,)\., ) -4 jszwfm_--12441,-- „ ,,,-- 4rV " ,--- -x,„,:tre, s., I GREENE ,,, —, - ,--- : . ' I'S' ... , .;;,,.., x 7 •° ' -7''''•■ 7'•'..-'''.7'7 7:7':'"1**: , -7" ; fp r PROPERT i ot....„.... -i-'7:47,7LoPiriciiii, , 14 c j 0t 4, '- ''-ii . t .--..re_radg:g F,44.0 n bor (I) A76 . . i s , . rElgIti VArEitufaeotria3) , .. ALL. i-eYr ± 4,e1 wwe . • , .. N.6 se-ALE A.r- - - .1 , ,t‘ , e lit)12114 V e: 1_E agEokno -- ce,rreo At.g .toy ge 114.00 Gb ' qt ... ' 4it gaser.............t. • q.Or 15,e-ovvvawrZ \el:::0 (yAL V A 4 6' S ELL) IA FIGURE 3. The location of the Greene property within the Tala Point Bald Eagle Territory and the location of bald eagle Nest Tree#2. to v ©o \ �\ m z s .4 - ,q g QF i ��o o • \� /�j \ v is C)is CO yo \ . '''.k`7/'''''''''.......'''.%.* ..... 5 p 0 ,y i 0 k 401 (A zz cm --Z._ ? rI I /1 � 7 "IC')� ff; / � , , , J a o o0 \ p � o / O ail\1 rrl ___________----f 1 ---....„,.. ,.ii 0 4---...c.i I I . i , , 7 vJ m I y \ L j -4 / �k Isoo / r c 'c-3 \[ \------ I k- .z0 rig riH" I) ,k .4%,7-ii toli 0 m \ �O k ri1 o u)r r-- ym., z r y °O 7 _ _ _- _ m o �O Ate' ■ b 'v 1/ � • "i I k o I 01 'II r III ail I I �Z • 0 � I I I / ` o , �.+ o I I Rtz) oil Z N I 1 c." I 111 Id o \ .,_ \ 2 1 0 z...., III! 14 ic\ '.... ........„._ -- -- or 4 '4. el) W Ig'; IN \ 'Th'04%,, .4- \\, -: xg 1 h , CI. cl 1 1 2 ,.... ,-,"7"7\ , \ 4 123 c I CD 1 \ IE' 11 a \ \ `���� \` I r 1 I o 4. iv "Zi \ \. \ ;NNitis‘•••• :ia• IV M o \ °`" I Q to a if-0; 1111161W CV mi C7 0I \ \\ \ '�'m Nril es \ op,.t �� \ \ I o0 ts 0,-- a i■ q pi ,0 .,._0 cra 1 ... Vs�m .,.. ., _ , u � y \ / o wm �� \ a> Z G 1 i rbo z \ / �► Z-� 1 P3Z$r, A 2 2. C N o -I ". cr,= Z 1 r_ °C .� V op, \ \ ^.. 6� ttltatk tltti t kt obAk.,AgaC �$ro'wv'wuxa _ei."" as ',1 10 Ma>HOW 1 „ ,:r1:11,1,, ::::, . , , .., ..,, lig.:NA . , ...„ . „,,r, y ,..„.• .. .,-,,, i. i. q , . i, k - , 1 if. ...., „, iiiii„lil,giit;;ii.„ 1:183,E:r,I.iiiii , .., _ 1 Q 1 1 •;4104III Rte' n In lu P4i6uI i —I-- . 2 :`-' q -1.141- iii qq _. E r aM �. 7<� •vv �a m 01 n $ G4 l l In i61 u�m,_',. t o m�S; S. ■ \` 7? Otq \ hN �.nG'. '�y.�Fd�yl�'��"'11 i'u, l In,nl,�ei uiD3 021. 0 •6i" m unt ,,li lye ■�, \ 4;; : V 61\�\ hh�}•�� g t� gn■gl I 1 m V d 4 b 3,, \� '\\ All $ i•.___ '-----_ _ � o ,\ n i CA : I ,� ix.... �� r - a : s ; .® A 1 ■ \ 4---r..1——— ':',41;.',,i1.4;...,,,,,i,:..ityt;.':‘,,,,,:ii.:; , • CAi RIZ gl RI !I 1; ; /Ili lil 1 i ¢r $ po gs,., 41- 7,// r \� / } o 1 m / n,I kS S - ¢C� "" . �• . r, A g ry� y , , :1// Q // � � , . m% \ , i'Q 1 E -1• a ,4,.,,,,,‘i ” mg• 88 Pi 1 o /max \.1 `. , (tq cQi ; ?2 t / j i \,/ / ,�:�. shy. m z \ • n 0 F{ f ee J a 1 Z.O -1 > " I rr r'"� \ 1 II I .4' #F 1,41.1,:..),'.%,.;',' i' -is -- - i / r�.{"`r? �� •�"{r� !.-..i..I '�✓'\ 111 I / - _ _ _._• 1/6 �� 101.N.,........,:a PIS' '''''.'W-,µ i;±.0 \ / �1 /�I O C =V --- i1, i;n ./ �n.,,' i � �, Iry . iCV'• k./° \ —J w Gi I /o •I wpm ---�.— - _ -s4 2 m n M1 o./ I •fi � �if }nth{ S^4��N� - 1s `t :r, I � ' 5-3 . o .per �iir---------� �: z1 d4 I s 1 ' *fi t + v i _-._I I I i' ''''''. .i.'" ‘..-:".."1. -- :... r '4,/{ r ., 4.',::M.A04:12 ,,QS / I boi v Z 1 I' I 1 \ .,r,..r Jr.:`:"y 1.. rx ,.4.r C°11,,1,X 5., ,2`o y'•,I II C it // — y� O { kI I I� wets% 'ati1=�FI�Ih e�4.. ♦ �� M1i 9e J^ ,kT•SN'e�Z'+,t ..,"v. ` 1 rr r o / _ —1 ` � i � N N �'\ \art ,O' , �i' e �;}� 040.i1.0,404::.. \ -9 = rn - z `;•I I �e ..\\\ \ \'�. '' -;:,`et.,', ^ .' `fir�`i.iNAt'',: £6,n3>4 I'` 'OO ~ / _ _ \��` \:�'`..� \�\ .. �± '. \ ��`\\\� ��\ ? �? Nth 1 _ _-.. 't \� — s P r. V zgi ---------- :1---7-_-_---;'-'11•',•I''I'll, ' .§ .....v.„...„,,,„:40 ,,,,, , ,r,:l..,:..„„1„,, ,,4.*:„.5.,6,-*NO-l.4i,t,,10.. , RI 1R5f- g g f416.g 2 2...,, . N•,.N,, ,.,..14.•••;4 --_____=. -- - - I \ , ___,/ '&' 0; 1=___ — --• K 0:-.,,1 r,,,,.,. , __ ._,,, . , 1, ,.,„„ ,:, ,_____„_ ,.., it._-, .4. .. ..._::: f,-.7..--- t.-... 1 , , , . _ _ „ VT :1 .a��\` .dr I Ate , = l■ Mili* 4' $ bC;crø0� H _�_ " � I _� /r ..?" .... Ili ''...A* 6s, - -:2v, '14.%:- .4(- '4!4'4%, / -- ' '')/ ''' ' 0 _ - _ �,�/ � : tr! �/ ......_. „, ____ g„\ ter \. C ti --„....._ ,_,- m ,,..... mco ,N m 0?0F w ` \\'\ �' v� -_e� -Iii:0 I\ --- _ w \ N — / — -- i TEA 0,..'-.„6 m \ -J ® _- w __ _ CO 0 1 x , _ _ rn 8 b z M off ==-- A 0 N W y ....- .. X -p- --- a o m m O p � tn I!-v I N ^C,M , i ! ? 9 C .n.=--1 _ g 4 �\f Cn N a xx ro r z fn r [ I^" —I : A` . m l I I l o r" rzn ?P O z 7 r H• re,,, ,- I I t x D ,+. m I I b x m Z o ITI 71 G a y I ' I m l s h .a M M • it S{I{ 0°0,0 • t`<f ;''.'.?£3 p 4 g Om Zy Z m C 9 a • ..3}j;t• • • • A ' ,„OOx pN . . . GJ N L 8 0 0 N of yi :t;~: O (NW 1/4 15-28N-1E) — — — — — — — — — 2436.70 MLR. 0 O_*ON I ) O o N N pvOO � o� C . 0ON N y la ro O pO O (w N 1]Ilal O 8Y N Pm 0 p m R N'ooN d 04444k "" g - V m . G T� O - 1 O MR.MO ^N H N a> < 2 ,h yY 90� ./ 0 = In Of P 8 V-1-.1.240-1-.8 C^� tl ; P U .- \ — — — - P °" °y a°s :sPOmo°=°= Ili Z. A IP2,1...2 - ., s °P ^ .,lam o e..-- - w rrs P u et SP--N Rm 1 I L„ ee NP �P to $1_I I 1 „ p v $I 1 1 „ nt J{`ICI I 1 ? Q t I It'll I I S a I 0 n 'S 1° 1 I 1 1 I O ' J '� 1 m 1 I I I I I I a 1 I I I I I 1 I i $: I r I I 1 1 � § I 1. I 1 0 1 '" I i I• l I 1 ,a\\ T. m 1 52 nf 1 RI W I i ! N o 915, A CT) z S II D M rn I z NJ r- 0 oi O" €::a A- fig r ! W!! I 211 tl,WM:iili '1 c ApznnA IQo z % mam af3 chi R s , m z 0 07 4 a 'ze ) f m ? xr. m ze o r n m n m :g^ em A A o Y _ - N fir: 888 �� w (SW 1/4 16-28N-1E) 2637.w - - - A m $ c 2. 0 NP"OM x 0 NfQN N�oN WN<� W NSA °U 7J N. fT KJ O LA,0 0 O Nop T No0 A .a.0 O �o o L o A O iiiui m 1!ii!IIIIIF R ES - e 11111 L r ZJ 0 O HOOD CANAL Z n 0 0 Z 'C "I N ( T (�) N) N A 0 CO I (-7' -. = ' :" '-?: : ,3,1 —,„pm.....m._ O 8 m N 0 Om z 5 ,2 S z Map Output Page 1 of 3 821151005/006 5~ { 'L cti - ...fit -.,...j • http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 f 1 821151013 / . ... .. 622 225101$ / i 821151012 ti ' 821151010 �` P {y 11 821151015 i low_ .., r f+ r Fr 621153001 821151002 // 821151009 1 f / f'�l Legend/ ii' n &fleeted Features � t 821151008 �.�a Road Syslarn 1t — 821151007 4 ( Parcels-11 821151006 ! VMeEa-CitlDride - iQfl or Ar_aa 821151005 • lllf yf efdA.fen103are2ftu �e $21151004 1' * 200 or higher u z 998200332 / 996200331 �../ rt fr *,. 51P2 r 998200330 „ N ,a�x sIPz /f 968200333 la, F, Cast 9E 2 r gif Boundaries t 998220326 .It D 1 v ° 998200334 / hr watr rrJ C*oCanMmc 998200336 i ^ .. / i 92620032S ,_, ,, , ,,.,_,r_...—„,,,, _, aj !Mans wa dedlrf joifersoi Casty Caw*s 'oces LS 0!I ..s. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 12:00:24 2005 http://gis server/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 821151013 1` $21151012 t I J' 1 821151011 r� 1 k' ' $21151010 r; fr, s �� $21151015 �� undll6, t, r' 821152401 821151002 821151009 l Legend + Se4ected Features / Road System 821151008 { r' Parcels-H / 821151007 i' ShorehnesAres 821151006 7 I" C r. v �rp'S.ers s,' 821151044 Cum.r k;,is xu Ji $21151404 998200331 lead 998200332 /I / / Nag 98200333 srae�a s wna, �,t�4 yy�y / 4 998200328 1 §'1C' 9 9 82 00334 / ft Soundanes 99822400327 r, f / r1 .. )Co.Er., 998 ss 99824�d326 { �7 H Wla- ", 998200325 fr O Janus Caa* s 998200336 / �' 998240324 998240331 998200323 f' Mom xcre,daf by Jefe son Carey Copra arstx GS S ( 0 maimmoisrmormin 30211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:54:57 2005 http://gis server/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 2 821151005/006 k rL` 1111.Ner Legend Selected Features :' Road System a Parcels-H Streams /4/ Type 9 Type 5 Tyr 4 2" 14/ Type 3 M /4/ Type 2 /./ lyre 1 /4/ Crne. New Stream Types Ael Fen*-143ta Jam:xi:to:1 " 4 gFain tiatxut Madded N:n 4en Hama Uirnotleed ,A!* Nairrism Hatt=Mainted /4/ Seim-don ci State feh/ Jritrxriin Lake Types f 1111 1.4 1111 5 No.1,,ttsglsv LFA-Ftsh ,fre 7 II Marbled Murrelets Spotted Owls 2 2,2 Pnonty Habitats and Species Boundaries 222 aqtV Carnes FOR INFORMATIONAL INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 - " Legend Selected Features 4asza Road System Parcels-H Heritage Points Boundaries ..„,„„,„„c., krt.Ca.rtes ••.'z - ••■ 441 r- - \44cts praedTd j, 4 Or A 302t1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:56:36 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/corn.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 821151005/006 1 821.10,3 `T i i .2,151.10 / � � � `� �� //I ,. - - / 821151009 Legend 821151008 sauueupaatums nLauy/y*m / / paca/s'1- / 821151005 . _.,f. wa/� i, s RiIeRav/+sco*s/a"s ■ ,,,,g1/2 sounua,a, | ^^" / I 996200333 / ' M=329 9982043335 / S /1 998200326 ,.. i998200324 ,-J 998200523 // FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:57:20 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 8: "51013 $21151012 ir 121151011 . 821151011 ' 821151015; 1.3. 1 t / INIIWVE' 821152001 8211 14.1,4 821151009 / r /i : i / r v Legend 821151++-° ,/ Selected Features s 82115100' Road System / F Parcels-H 821151008: 821151005AW `.`°' 4 Seismic Hazard r' I Bou nda res 21151 i r a J :cam ors Co " }/ / 998200331 I D '.a� l (S1G1(332 4.l / f° or..-co......:,. , 1 D i 99E320 333 ,, 998244129 i � 0lG998203,328 1 998200334 { —I{ 998200327 ` s 4� xi 998244335 r , @V%V1 99#2443 i8 / 988200325 a s u , yv + 00 94$200324 0 E 998200323 VI ws wooded try Je,rtan Corry Cars ;aa.lc GIS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:57:43 2005 1 htt :// isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrima .Esrima ?ServiceNam = vm — p g p p e o ap&ChentVersion-4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 821151013 ii 821151012 /r ! ,I $21151011 f/ 821151010 }/rr �� � 821151015 r i rte { / / a21 152001 821151002 821151089 / / 1 I / / Legend 821151008 / 0 Selected Features 1 System �' 821151..7 ° Road 5 m 821151006 // Parcels-H 4. r Landslide Hazard f 82t131005 swen /frif / f 82115100444 / �/ V01200331 / / 'dodarat! 908200.132 /I stop r 998200330 8oundanes 908230333 -----7// 99e2 0032S. ''n la/msorr County waver :t,,, .:_._ I cis co ram 200334 t 1 9982003[1' ! ''`°' / I L / 998200324 337 ---- 2;• _'13 ri Maps;modal by Je oiCcrrr.,_,,1.$:...•.".-zGIS ati`' C 30211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:58:40 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 I Map Output Page 1 of 1 821151005/006 821151013 1 I J 821151012 821181411 II 821151010 / f $21151015 41 S f t f fr / ', / 821152001 821151002 lr 821151009 f.f Legend /, r Selected Features / 8211.51C, / /r Road System 82115100? " Parcels-11 821151006 Crtthcat Aquifer Recharge Areas 821151005 /L..• 821151004 il I SJsc-JNK /r SAR?A«SJSL' 9982 332 /' / 998230331 0 uSC / / 996200330 ® SAR?A EDSAr2PA«uNaC 998200333 / 998200329 f Boundaries / 598200328 / I .cSerSmCasKx. 998220334 / le Wiz, /i „,t cauites 7 998200336 X33 s ae f Y a 8 11 ri �82U032a 9982W3.3? N t a c/ ?9$2130-32 2. I a '41 .,:kod b Carr,C r,.s;LI is es.act, 0 342ft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 21 11:59:55 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Fo... 11/21/2005 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 821151005 Printed: November 18, 2005 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner COM03-00068 GREENE F Application Received: 11/25/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 10/28/2005 Stormwater violations. No findings,conditions, or permissions found. PRE02-00006 MLA01-00553 SMITH F J SMITH Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/5/2002 Case Finaled: Variance from setbacks of Type V stream No findings,conditions,or permissions found. PRJ02-00008 MLA01-00553 SMITH P Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Site Plan Approval Advance Determination No findings,conditions, or permissions found. ZON01-00064 MLA01-00553 SMITH I F J SMITH Application Received: 11/2/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/22/2002 Case Finaled: 8/21/2003 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on November 7, 2001 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline Wetland Area; Shoreline Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Shoreline Flood Area(Zone A); Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area on South -Central Portion of Lot; Seismic Hazard -Western Half of the Lot; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ) and Type 1 Marine Shoreline. 2.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 3.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 4.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 5.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. The designer preparing the SPAAD report offered a conceptual design for an onsite sewage system. However, a complete design package was not reviewed.This SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute approval of this design and there may be other options available at the time of application for a septic permit. 6.) This Site Plan Approval Advance Determination approval is subject to removal of the existing culvert located between soil logs#3 and #4 as indicated on the site plan dated 10/25/01 and per the Revised Site Plan dated November 20, 2002. 7.) A Geotechnical Report was prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc.for the property. The report was prepared November 18, 2002. The Report contains Conclusions and Recommendations for development of the property. 8.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses (2) All Commercial Uses (3) All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 9.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(2). 10.) This approval is for a Site Plan Advance Approval Determination (SPAAD) only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The Revised site plan as submitted on November 20 ,2002 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC. It has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 20, 2002 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 12.) The subject property has been designated Rural Residential (RR 1:5) under the Jefferson County Comperhensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. Page 1 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 13.) An address has not been assigned to the subject property. 14.) The proposed SPAAD was reviewed for consistency with the Site Plan Criteria of the Unified Development Code (Section 8.7).The criteria for approval is as follows: 1]The proposed site conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following:The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Shoreline Master Program and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff Comment:The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan and the Shoreline Master Program. The application was found to be in compliance with the Unified Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan.The proposal was not reviewed for consistency with the Shoreline Master Program as a tightline to the beach is anticipated in conjunction with a future building permit for a single family residence. 2]Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff Comment:The proposal was not reviewed for open space as the future building parcel is approximately 1.3 acres in size. The proposal was reviewed by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department to assure adequate sewage disposal. The Health Department reviewed the proposal and determined on November 26, 2001 that the site plan datedl0/25/01 (received 11/1/01) is adequate and soils are approved for a pressurized partial fill drainfield with ATU pretreatment system.The revised site plan identified a single well with a 50-foot exclusion zone for transport pipes and a 100-foot exclusion zone for drainfields. Based on the revised site plan received November 20, 2002,the well is existing and recently drilled. (See findings and conditions of this case related to Coastal SIPZ).The site is served by a private access road idenified as Tala Shore Drive.The site is beyond the end of the County Road, therefore, no road approach permit is necessary, per the Department of Public Works. An address has yet to be assigned to the parcel. The Jefferson County Department of Public Works has granted approval of a Conceptual Drainage Plan for the parcel on October 30, 2002.The applicant/contractor shall adhere to the approved Conceptual Drainage Plan for drainage/stormwater control. The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow because the parcel is not included within a known water system district, since it is on an individual well. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting.Application of Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP)fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source, and storage. 3]The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan,together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of the Unified Development Code and Chapter 43.21C RCW. Staff Comment: Based on conditions of the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner related to application for Reasonablel Economic Use Variance under Section 3.6.4(h) of the Unified Development Code, probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan were evaluated. The evaluation included practical means to mitigate adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. (See findings and conditions related to the reasonable economic use variance). A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 has been prepared for the subject property.The report contains several conclusions and recommendations designed to lessen environmental impacts of the proposed site plan. (See findings and conditions related to the report). 4]Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safely and general welfare. Staff Comment:Approving the site plan will promote the public use and interest. Adequate provision has been or will be made for the public health, safety and general welfare. 15.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage disposal system design approval. Page 2 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 16.) Duration of Approval - Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5) year period,the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g.wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 17.) The parcel is located within a Coastal SPIZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002 that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but with no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in grounwater sources within 1000-feet. 18.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (see attached). 19.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 20.) Bare soils are subject to erosion,thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 21.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 22.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system.These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 23.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 24.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 25.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 26.) An engineered drainage control plan should be developed for this property to address items 4, 6&7 on page 4 of the Geotechnical Report. 27.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single-family residence. 28.) Minimum setback from the private access road (Tala Shore Drive) easement line shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be as recommended in the Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002. Owner/Applicant should contact the Environmental Health Department to determine setbacks from septic tank, drainfields and the well. 29.) Maximum impervious surface area coverage is 25 percent. Impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, driveways, rooftops, concrete, etc. 30.) Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Page 3 of 22 Cates Name Review Type Status Planner 31.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL SIPZ: Water Conservation 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly; 2. Water collected from Storm Water and roof catchment may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3.Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4) Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5) Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6) Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 32.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL SIPZ: 1) Installation of a flow meter; 2) On-Going well monitoring for chloride concentration; and 3) Submittal of monitoring data to the County. 33.) MANDATORY MEASURES OF COASTAL SPIZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH -approved water system if available; 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: a) Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 34.) The Site Plan Advance Approval Determination (SPAAD) will become valid upon filing an approved restrictive covenant with the Jefferson County Audior's Office. 35.) If tightline disposal of storm water runoff is selected, a shoreline development exemption approval from Jefferson County will be required. Note the importance of the location of the end of a tight line pipe, i.e. how it is anchored/fastened in place; and what will be done to disapate the energy from the collected water where it exists from the end of the pipe.A "root wad" may be required at and below the end of the pipe outlet to disperse and slow water to minimize erosion of the face of the bluff and at the beach. 36.) If the tightline for runoff water ends waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark, SEPA review will be required in addition to Shoreline Development Exemption approval. 37.) The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Area Eagle Habitat Biologist Shelly Ament indicated that an Eagle Management Plan will be required BEFORE ANY CLEARING OR TREE REMOVAL ON THE PROPERTY. 38.) Because the streamside buffer area reduction, it is especially important to maintain the remaining buffer in its natural condition. No native vegetation or dead trees or shrubs should be removed from the stream buffer zone. Any invasive non-native species should be removed from the buffer area and controlled to prevent future invasion. 39.) The large conifers at the western end of the property and at the northern end of the bluff to the east of the property, which will provide habitat protection for the existing eagles and osprey using the nearby nest.A 30-foot deep vegetation buffer zone is also indicated on the SPAAD, which is an important contribution to maintaining bluff stability. 40.) The stream water flow patterns should not be altered in any way by channelizing, dredging or damming. Foot bridges over the stream shall be used to maintain the natural condition of the stream. Culverts should not be used for crossing the stream. 41.) Construction of the proposed two (2) structures will involve removal of existing native understory and small trees. Native vegetation at least equal to that removed and lost by construction will need to be planted in other buffer areas. Disturbances to soil and existing native plants should be kept to a minimum. 42.) Within the stream or other buffer areas,the use of chemicals is prohibited.The use of fertilizers and pesticides are to be avoided in order to maintain and provide a balance of the stream's ecosystem. Organic fertilizers and compost are to be used when enhancing the buffer area with native vegetation. Page 4 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 43.) The stream must be protected during construction.The access of construction and heavy equipment to the building pad on the east side of the stream is to be done in such a manner as to provide maximum protection of stream flow and hydrology. 44.) Every effort must be made by the owner/applicant/contractor(s)to direct stormwater runoff away from the stream and bluff area to prevent impacts to the stream's existing hydrology and the bluff stability. 45.) At the time of building permit application, the applicant is required to implement one of the three options of recommendation/condition number 8 of the Habitat Management Plan. 46.) The applicant is required to implement the Conditions of Hearing Examiner's Decision on the variance as per the findings, conclusions and decision dated September 11, 2002. 47.) A Geotechnical Report was prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. for the property. The report was prepared November 18, 2002. The Report contains Conclusions and Recommendations for development of the property. ZONO2-00009 MLA01-00553 SMITH Ill F J SMITH Application Received: 1/25/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/11/2002 Case Finaled: 8/21/2003 Request for a variance ro—f m required 50-foot buffer from a Type V stream for construction of a proposed single family residence, a garage w/office&gym and a driveway.The request is to reduce the buffer to a minimum of 10-feet for the residence, garage&driveway. The request is to vary from the buffer requirements of Subsection 3.6.8 and Table 3.2 Standard Streamside Buffers of the Unified Development Code. No findings,conditions,or permissions found. BLD05-00557 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P M FARFAN Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 10/12/2005 NSFR 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 28, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection,the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ). 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 6.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 7.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak(Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow(Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes Sanguineum),Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). Page 5 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interlace in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells).The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 9.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 10.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 11.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 12.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 13.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 14.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream & landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 15.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 16.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 17.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 18.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM.. 19.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs,trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 20.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 21.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan. Page 6 of 22 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 22.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 23.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 24.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 25.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 26.) The applicant is proposing to create or add square feet of impervious surface and square feet of land disturbing activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a 27.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 28.) A Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 29.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 30.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 31.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 32.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on August 26, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been a pp roved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 14, 2005 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 33.) This approval is for a single family residence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 34.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. Page 7 of 22 Cases • Name Review Type Status Planner 35.) Not more than two (2) unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code(UDC) Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13) or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area(ESA). 36.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 37.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 38.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 39.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 40.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 41.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 42.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 43.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However, the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 44.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance (ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004&OTH03-0012)were finaled. A septic permit (SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit(BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence (BLD05-0557). A building permit for a(BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. A shoreline permit (SDP05- )for a tightline to the beach will be issued with the residence permit. 45.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 46.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 47.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 48.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 49.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 50.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 51.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 52.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006&821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. 53.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION,THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. Page 8 of 22 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 54.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING, AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping" OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 55.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS,AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 56.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 57.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 58.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS, AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 59.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED, THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, 60.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY,TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. Page 9 of 22 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 61.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS,THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY,AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT, THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER (WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES) CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER (WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES) THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 62.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL,ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS,THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. 63.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206)459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR (206) 753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 64.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 65.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys &Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. BLD05-00558 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P M FARFAN Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 10/12/2005 DETACHED GARAGh WI ADU Page 10 of 22 Cases . Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 28, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection,the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area(SIPZ). 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 6.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 7.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii),Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow(Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa),Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 9.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 10.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 11.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc.was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. Page 11 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 12.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 13.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 14.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream &landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 15.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 16.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 17.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 18.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM.. 19.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs,trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 20.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 21.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan. 22.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 23.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 24.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 25.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 26.) The applicant is proposing to create or add square feet of impervious surface and square feet of land disturbing activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a 27.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. Page 12 of 22 Cases - Name Review Type Status Planner 28.) A Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 29.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6,2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 30.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 31.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 32.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on August 26, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 14, 2005 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 33.) This approval is for a detached garage with ADU only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 34.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 35.) Not more than two (2) unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13) or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). 36.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 37.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 38.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 39.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 40.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 41.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU). 42.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 43.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However,the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 44.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance (ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004&OTH03-0012) were finaled. A septic permit(SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit (BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence (BLD05-0557). A building permit for a (BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. A shoreline permit(SDP05- ) for a tightline to the beach will be issued with the residence permit. 45.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 46.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical.Also,the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 47.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. Page 13 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 48.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system. These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 49.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 50.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 51.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 52.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006&821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. 53.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION,THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. 54.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING, AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping"OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 55.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS, AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 56.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 57.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 58.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS, AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 59.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED,THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, Page 14 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 60.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY,TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. 61.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS,THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY, AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT,THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER (WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES) CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER (WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES) THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 62.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL, ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS, THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. Page 15 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 63.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206) 459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR (206) 753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 64.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 65.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys&Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. BLD05-00570 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P M FARFAN Application Received: 8/31/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: FOOT BRIDGE 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 28, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Suburban shoreline designation; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Level 1 (slight) Landslide Hazard Area; Seismic Hazard; Bald Eagle Territory; Osprey Nest; Coastal Seawater Intrusion Area (SIPZ). 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) A Type 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. A variance to the stream buffer was granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner on September 11, 2002. The variance allowed a 10 foot setback from OHWM to the proposed single family residence and detached garage with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining. A 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM was also granted. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 6.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. Page 16 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 7.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder (Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow(Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant (Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 8.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells).The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 9.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 10.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 11.) A Geotechnical Report dated November 18, 2002 prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top bank to any structure. 12.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 13.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 14.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream &landslide hazard area buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 15.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs,trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 16.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 17.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 18.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 10 feet from OWHM to the proposed detached garage and single family residence with a 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to the OHWM.. 19.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. Page 17 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 20.) Stream buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 21.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan. 22.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards,there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets,faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 23.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 24.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 25.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 26.) The applicant is proposing to create or add square feet of impervious surface and square feet of land disturbing activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a 27.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 28.) A Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan dated August 2005 has been prepared by Northwestern Territories, Inc. and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 29.) A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Control No. 102795-1 was approved on September 1, 2005. Project work may commence on September 6, 2005 and shall be completed by November 15, 2006. Proponent/contractor shall adhere to all conditions of said HPA. 30.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions,the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 31.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 32.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on August 26, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 14, 2005 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 33.) This approval is for a foot bridge only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 34.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. Page 18 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 35.) Not more than two (2) unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on any lot less than one-half acre unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 6. Outdoor storage of thirteen (13) or more unlicensed or inoperable vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a Permitted Use in Table 3-1 of the UDC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of UDC Section 4.10. In no case, shall any such unlicensed or inoperable vehiclesbe stored in an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). 36.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 37.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 38.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 39.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 40.) Minimum setback from Tala Shore Drive right-of-way shall be 20-feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from the top of the shoreline bluff shall be 50 feet. Minimum setback from OWHM to residence and detached garage shall be 10 feet with an additional 5 foot building setback adjoining and a 40 foot setback from the driveway to OWHM. 41.) The parcels have been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 42.) An address of 850 Tala Shore Drive, Port Ludlow has been assigned to the parcel. Tala Shore Drive is a is a county local access road (C509109). However,the subject parcel extends beyond the jurisdiction of the county road and is considered private road. 43.) A SPAAD (ZON01-0064)was finaled on August 21, 2003. A pre-application conference was conducted on August 5, 2002 for a variance from a stream setback. A variance (ZONO2-0009)for a stream setback was finaled on August 21, 2003. A wet-season evaluations (OTH03-0004 &OTH03-0012)were finaled. A septic permit (SEP05-0290)will be issued with the building permit. A building permit (BLD05-0558)for a detached garage w/ADU will be issued with the residence (BLD05-0557). A building permit for a (BLD05-00570)for a foot bridge will be issued with the residence. A shoreline permit (SDP05- ) for a tightline to the beach will be issued with the residence permit. 44.) The building setback from the bluff to the house should be at least 50-feet in order to provide an adequate setback for the proposed home for at least the economic life of the sturcture. 45.) Bare soils are subject to erosion, thus ground cover should be encouraged and maitained. Native vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be most benefical. Also, the existing established trees and brush on the bluff provide stabilization to the bluff and should be left in a relatively natural state. Selective thinning and pruning can be utilized to improve the view. 46.) Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of landslides is the presence of excessive groundwater in the soil near the bluff. 47.) Runoff from roofs and other hard surfaces such as driveways and patios should be controlled and routed to the beach via tightline or into the stream through a time release system.These options are preferred rather than infiltration, which may cause destabilization of the bluff. Surface water dischage or sedimentation to adjacent properties should not be significantly higher than pre-development conditions. 48.) Septic drainfields should not be constructed between the house and the bluff. 49.) All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. 50.) Silt fences or other acceptable sediment control devices may need to be utilized in order to prevent sedimentation to adjacent properties during construction. 51.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded on February 3, 2003 under AFN 465235 for the purpose of combining APN's 821151006&821151005 strictly for building and septic purposes only. 52.) TO ENSURE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ARE FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE COMPLETE TEXT OF SAID PLAN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT AND KEPT ON SITE AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROPRIATE SUBCONTRACTORS. Page 19 of 22 Cases . Name Review Tvi a Status Planner 53.) THE FOLLOWING BMP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ADDITION TO ANY THAT MAY LATER BE NECESSARY DUE TO CHANING AND UNFORESEEN SITE CONDITIONS: A. INSTALL STRAW BALE CHECK DAMS AND SILT FENCING PER THE EROSION CONTROL MAP AT THE BEGINNING OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. REMOVE THE DAMS, SILT FENCING,AND ANY ENTRAPPED SILTS AFTER THE EXPOSED SOILS ON THESITE ARE COVERED WITH VEGETATION AND/OR GRAVELS. B. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES PER THE PLANS AT THE END OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. C. OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH AS LIMITATIONS ON ACCESS ROUTES, MINIMIZATION OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ETC. AS DESCRIBED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE OBJECTIVES OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. IT IS EXPECTED THAT MINOR ADJUSTMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHERE AN UNEXPECTED NEED ARISES, MAY BE NECESSARY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SECTION V.B. "Stabilization and Sediment Trapping"OF SAID DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DRAINAGE PLAN. 54.) CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LIMITS ARE STAKED IN THE FIELD. THIS INCLUDES DELINEATING CLEARING LIMITS; PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENT LINES, STREAM BUFFERS, AND SIMILAR BOUNDARIES. ONCE THESE STAKES ARE SET, CARE SHALL BE TAKEN THAT THE STAKES ARE NOT DISTURBED. 55.) NO FLOWS OR DEPOSITS FROM EXPOSED OR DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO LEAVE THE PROJECT SITE. AS SOON AS UNEXPECTED THREATS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES BECOMES APPARENT, SUFFICIENT MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO EITHER ELIMINATE THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT OR TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF DEFENCE AGAINST THE THREAT. 56.) NO SOILS SHALL BE EXPOSED, OR GRADING OPERATIONS PERFORMED, UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED BMP'S IN THE DRAINAGE PATH BELOW THE AREA TO BE EXPOSED HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND GRADING OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMP'S ARE EXPECTED FROM THIS REQUIREMENT. 57.) IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE SLOPES OF DITCHES, BERMS, PONDS,AND SIMILAR STRUCTURAL ITEMS BE STABILIZED. THESE SLOPES WILL NOT ONLY SHED AS MUCH SILT AS ANY OTHER EXPOSED SLOPE, BUT THEIR EROSION COULD CAUSE THE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURAL BMP. 58.) AFTER CUT OR FILL SLOPES ARE COVERED, THEY SHOULD BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT THE COVERING IS FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED AND THAT RILLS ARE NOT FORMING UNDER OR THROUGH THE COVERING, 59.) UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: A. A MAJOR SOURCE OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED FLOWS IS FROM PUMPING OR OTHERWISE DEWATERING TRENCHES. FOR THIS REASON, FLOWS DISCHARGED FROM PUMPING OR OTHER METHOD OF TRENCH DEWATER SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED AND, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS NO VISIBLE TURBIDITY, TREATED AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAINAGE PLAN UNDER SECTION TITLED "DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES". B. WHERE FEASIBLE, NO MORE THAN 500 FEET OF TRENCH SHALL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. C. WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS, STOCKPILES OF EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TENCH. ANY SUCH STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AS PROVIDED IN SAID DRAINAGE PLAN. D. TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND REVEGETATED AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES. WHEREVER TRENCHES RUN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT UP AND DOWN A SLOPE, EITHER THE BACKFILL SHALL BE MOUNDED OVER THE TRENCH OR WATERBARS OR SIMILAR BMP'S SHALL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE BACKFILLED TRENCH FROM BECOMING A WATER COURSE. SIMPLY COVERING THE EXPOSED SOIL MAY NOT PREVENT THE TRENCH FROM CONVEYING WATERS. E. WHERE THE UPSTREAM END OF A PIPE IS SUBJECT TO INUNDATION, IT SHALL BE TMEPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED AT THE END OF EACH DAY'S WORK TO PREVENT SOIL FROM BEING WASHING INTO THE PIPE. F. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE, 1-800-424-5555, SHALL BE CALLED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS (2 WORKING DAYS) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION AND ARRAGEMENTS MADE TO HAVE ALL BURIED UTILITIES MARKED. Page 20 of 22 Cans Name Review Type Status Planner 60.) TO PREVENT SOIL BEING TRACKED ONTO PAVED ROADS,THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT ACCUMULATION OF SOIL. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA. WASHING OF THE STREET SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. WHEREVER CONSTURCITON, DELIVERY,AND SIMILAR VEHICLES ENTER PAVED ROADS FROM THIS PROJECT,THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWIED TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SOIL ONTO THE PAVED ROAD. A. DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER (WEHRE THE SOIL IS TOO DRY TO ADHERE TO THE TIRES OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES) CONSTRUCTION EHICLES MAY ACCESS PAVED STREETS DIRECTLY FROM THE PROJECT SITE WITH MINITORING AND OCCASIONAL SWEPING OF THE PAVED STREET A SNECESSARY TO PREVENT ACCUMULATIONS OF SOIL. B. DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER (WHERE SOIL READILY ADHERES TO THE TIRES OF VEHICLES) THE VEHICLES MAY ACCESS GRAVELED ROADS DIRECTLY FROM THE PRJECT SITE AS NECESSARY, SUT SHALL NOT ACCESS PAVED ROADS WITHOUT FIRST HAVING BEEN ROUTED OVER AREAS WHERE EXISTING GRASS OR OTHER VEGETSTION REMAINS OR ROUTED DOWN A MINIMUM OF 150 FEET OF GRAVELLED ROAD. ACCESS ROUTES OVER GRASS OR OTHER VEGETATION SHALL BE CHANGED OCCASIONALLY TO ENSURE THAT WHEEL RUTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DEVELOP AND THAT THE VEGETATION IS NOT UNDULY WORN DOWN. 61.) REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMP'S TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED ONCE THEIR PRESENCE IS NO LONGER REQUIRED (WITHIN 60 DAYS). DURING THEIR REMOVAL, ANY ENTRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN SUITABLE LOCATIONS ON THE PRJECT SITE WHERE THEY WILL NOT BE SUBJECT OT EROSION. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT AFTER THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PROMPTLY STABILIZED. AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE REMOVAL OF ENTRAPPED SEDIMENTS, THEY MAY BE STABILIZED IN PLACE BY THE APPLCIATION OF SUITABLE BMP'S SUCH AS SODDING, MULCHING, SEEDING, ETC. IN NO CASE SHALL SEDIMENTS BE LEFT IN A CHANNEL OR WHERE THEY WOULD BE WASHED INTO RECEIVING WATERS BY THE NEXT STORM. 62.) CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT NO TOXIC OR NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES SHALL BE USED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF ON OR OFF THE PROJECT SITE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT EXCEPT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER OF THE SUBSTANCE. THE PROJECT LABEL OR INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AD THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR SUCH PRODECTS SHALL BE KEPT ON THE SITE UNTIL THE PRODUCT HAS BEEN USED UP OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND PROPERTLY DISPOSED OF. WHILE NOT COMMONLY THOUGHT OF AS A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMMON FERTILIZER CAN BE VERY DAMAGING IF ALLOWED TO ENTER RECEIVING WATERS. FERTILIZERS SHALL ONLY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLIER AND ANY CONCENTRATIONS SUCH AS DRIBBLES OR LEAKS SHALL BE CLEANED UP. IN THE EVENT OF A SPILL OR OTHER UNUSUAL EVENT INVOLVING TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, WORK IN THE VICINITY SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED AND THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES NOTIFIED: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, (206) 459-6000 DURING NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS OR (206) 753-2353 AFTER HOURS. 63.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM NORTHWESTERN TERITORIES, INC. STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DATED AUGUST 2005. 64.) Proponent shall comply with the planting requirements of the Habitat Management Plan prepared by Amy Lietman of Marine Sueveys&Assessments. A written letter from Ms. Lietman is required prior to final buidling occupancy to verify compliance of the Habitat Management Plan. BLD05-00594 MLA05-00526 GREENE I P M FARFAN Application Received: 9/14/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 10/12/2005 ROCK RETAINING WALL Page 21 of 22 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner No findings,conditions,or permissions found. PRJ05-00197 MLA05-00526 GREENE P n Application Received: 11/18/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings,conditions,or permissions found. SDP05-00026 MLA05-00526 GREENE P M FARFAN Application Received: 8/26/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SDP exemption No findings,conditions,or permissions found. OTH03-00004 GREENE F S PORTO Application Received: 1/13/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: WET SEASON EVALUATION No findings,conditions,or permissions found. OTH03-00012 GREENE F L ATKINS Application Received: 12/11/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: WET SEASON EVALUATION No findings,conditions,or permissions found. SEP05-00290 GREENE P Application Received: 8/29/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings,conditions,or permissions found. Page 22 of 22 Parcel Print. Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 821151005 11/15/2005 Owner Mailing Address: GARY F GREENE BETTY R GREENE 2442 NW MARKET ST # 166 SEATTLE WA 981074137 Site Address: 850 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW 98365 Section: 15 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: NE1/4 Fire Dist: Port Ludlow(3) Township: 28N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Paradise Bay(8) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S15 T28 R1E I TAX 6 &TL TAX B-12 I TRACT 2 OF UNREC FERN BAY 1 1/17 INTEREST IN TRACT 10 a" No Photo Available http://www.co.j efferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=821151005++++++++++... 11/18/2005 Map"Jutpu page 1 of 3 Features Not Surveyed , ` a _ 8'21151013 a- ' F, < a' '821151012 � #1 1 ', '_ r . 1151010 o3, '�i via 521151015 ' 821151004 � '� �� �� < 521151009 � -� ��,�; � �-4-t' a 821151008 >. ,� ' 8!1151007 � r o=af � fi <r . #` R= zR'_ . w€ 821151006 ,'1' ' , * `€ ,521151005 €k v 1 ` 998200331 t$.`j„.a:'` ,,: `� 99$200332 t� _ r ..a :,. '= � � ���` � � ��� 988240333 L 3 ... 4& ad 'QS TV;+ 99820 X36 1998200325 ,„ r r,��c .} .�.�.. Aar., http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=Tru... 11/18/2005 JEFFERSON COUNTY iXID NO. 77457 DATE I!la616 RECEIVED FROM .. . • f L. DESCRIPTION BARS# AMOUNT CURRENCY COIN 0 •.0 r � L O vv ° n5, 5ac� RECEIVED BY TOTAL & 4.q4. 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET GARY F GREENE MLA05-00526 Date Time Comments M FARFAN ae.„22 • I:\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt November 18,2005 1 ■ I , I r UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: M FARFAN Master#MLA05-00526 Review Type Project Description BLD05-00557 I NSFR BLD05-00558 I DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU BLD05-00570 I FOOT BRIDGE BLD05-00594 I ROCK RETAINING WALL PRJ05-00197 SDP05-00026 SDP exemption Primary: GARY F GREENE Site Address: BETTY R GREENE 850 TALA SHORE DR 2442 NW MARKET ST# 166 PORT LUDLOW WA,98365 SEATTLE WA 981074137 Project Location: Parcel Number 821 151 005 &006 in Section 15,Township 28,Range 01 East,WM,Located at 850 Tala Shore Dr,Port Ludlow,WA 98365 Parcel Number: 821151005 S-T-R: 15-28N-01E Total Acreage: 1 Legal Description S15 T28 R1E TAX 6&TL TAX B-12 TRACT 2 OF UNREC Land Use: 9100 FERN BAY 1/17 INTEREST IN TRACT 10 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690470B District: 49 Zoning: RR1.5 Parcel Number: 821151006 S-T-R: 15-28N-01E Total Acreage: 1 Legal Description S15 T28 R1E TAX 6&TL TAX B-11 TRACT 3 OF UNREC Land Use: 9100 FERN BAY UNDIV 1/17TH INT IN TRACT 10 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690470B District: 4 --"----- Zoning: RR1:5 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: & k 1 COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: InlY t MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ]Air'lot plan states "property line" .!m* Assessor's Map(Propert I nes u. bmitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) V A�Legal Access to Prope AO 4.= AO Parcel Tags or Scanne• locum- • �I ��� NO dr' ESA's: Special Reports ►_arby !:- 1 Shoreline De ..�;,do;0 NO ��OC StreamT i No Fish&Wile • , 0 Wetlands: YE _ Rare Plant . .N. NO Seismic: or 0 Landslide: YE Flood: YE.NO Erosion: YES • Aquifer Recharge Are :YES 0 SIPZ: none At .'•h Risk (:-Coa;-tal ) Stormwater site plan 'mitte o or .Forest Lands: Y: • Adjoining Forest Land Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding Mineral Lands: �•.�� 410 Agricultural Lands: YE•ei, gAr Stormwater:New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Re #1 thru#5 Min R #1 thru#10 Engi••.=• otice Provisions/Disclosur- •irport YES NO MRL YE NO Forest Lands YE NO ior Landscaping Required: Ye'. % Parking Spaces Required la 2 Other Building Height: 35' UB tandard Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% rea of Building '• -rage:60%in Ru :1 Industrial Lands only [ Total Building(s)Size: ii AAA , i. 41 i' IL/AU . 11 RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF N(4 7,500 SF GC:10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: ] Road Classification: Road Approach:EXISTIN REQ'D RAP SEPA Required:YES 1 ,,� Flood Certificate: , ll ,'1"- ...„Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): , ' t Violations: Yes No r ' Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance Ls s/Require Declaration of R--, ctive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO o'"7 Site Visit conducted YE'NO [ 41/ Require Final Zoning Approva YES 0 [ ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan c A ES New Parcel Tags entered .1 '- . 't Plan N/A Special Reports Scanned dp YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 1.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 2.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 3.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 4.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 5.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 6.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 7.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151006 8.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 9.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 10.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 11.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 12.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 13.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 14.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 15.) Habitat Manageme ZONO2-00009 8/28/02 Parcel tags found for parcel 821151005 16.) Geotechnical Rep ZON01-00064 11/25/02 Associated CASES status issued finaled description 821151005 COM03-00068 F 10/28/2005 Stormwater violations. MLA01-00553 PRJ02-00008 P Site Plan Approval Advance Determination PRE02-00006 F 8/5/2002 Variance from setbacks of Type V stream ZONO2-00009 F 9/11/2002 8/21/2003 Request for a variance from required 50-foot buffer from a Type V stream for construction of a proposed single family residence,a garage w/office&gym and a driveway.The request is to reduce the buffer to a minimum of 10-feet for the residence,garage&driveway.The request is to vary from the buffer requirements of Subsection 3.6.8 and Table 3.2 Standard Streamside Buffers of the Unified Development Code. ZON01-00064 F 11/22/2002 8/21/2003 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination MLA05-00526 BLD05-00557 P 10/12/2005 NSFR BLD05-00558 P 10/12/2005 DETACHED GARAGE W/ADU BLD05-00570 P FOOT BRIDGE BL D05-00594 P 10/12/2005 ROCK RETAINING WALL PRJ05-00197 P SDP05-00026 P SDP exemption OTH03-00004 F WET SEASON EVALUATION OTH03-00012 F WET SEASON EVALUATION SEP05-00290 P FOR FLAT BACKSLOPE, SURFACE SHOULD NUMBER BE IMPERVIOUS & SLOPED TO DRAIN I HEMLOCK I 10 -INCH ON TOP OF 48 -INC14 CEDAR 1 TO 2 MIN 16 ") _= 11= ROCKERY NOTES: WHITE RR FREE- DRAINING BACKFILL (MAX 5% FINES) 1. ROCKERIES 4' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. HEMLOCK 11= 11= 11= 11 =11 =� 1 =� 1 =1 MIN 8' WIDE LAYER OF 2 " -4' QUARRY 6 =1I=II=I1411I=II =II SPALLS ADJACENT TO ROCKERY 2. FOR ROCKERIES BETWEEN 4' AND 6' HIGH, THE INSTALLER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEE NOTES 1 -3 = I= 11= 1I= I= I1 0 11 =1) A LETTER TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION CERTIFYING THAT THE ED FOR PERMIT & =1 kd kZ1 kd kd kfl b STABLE CUT FACE IN NATIVE SUBGRADE AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS. CERTIFICATION = 111111 =II =11=11= MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 7). 1= 110140101= 3. ROCKERIES 6' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE ENGINEERING SUPERVISION BY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. = 11= 11= I1= 11 =II =) 1' (OR LESS) DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL - 11= 11= 11= II =11 INSPECTOR (UBC 3066), *NCH AT MINIMUM SHALL CONSIST OF INSPECTION AND WRITTEN o -II 1=11= II= II =I1 =11 MIN 6" COVER OVER PIPE; MIN 2" CERTIFICATION OF SUBGRADE, PLACEMENT OF BASE COURSE AND DRAINAGE, AND C 11 1=11 =I 1=11=11 GRAVEL UNDER PIPE. FINISHED ROCKERY. NEIGNT (MIN 3 ) - 0 41=11=11= �_ - =1= - MIN 4' DIM. PERE PIPE; MIN 1% 4. ROCK SHALL BE SOUND AND HAVE MINIMUM DENSITY OF 160 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. HEMLOCK CONTINUOUS SLOPE TO OUTLET; PIPE 13 MIN 12" & /OR CUT FACE LINED WITH FILTER 5. THE LONG DIMENSION OF ALL ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE WAIL - - - --- ---------- -- - - - -- FABRIC (MIRAFI OR EQUIVALENT). EACH ROCK SHOULD BEAR ON TWO ROCKS IN THE TIER BELOW. FIRM, UNDISTURBED SOIL 10 -INCH PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES MAPLE 24 -INCH 1. IMPROVED WALKING SURFACES ABOVE AND ADJACENT TO ROCKERIES OVER 30' IN HEIGHT ALDER 26 -INCH SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A GUARDRAIL CONFORMING TO UBC 1711. MAPLE NO ROADWAYS OR PARKING 19 HEMLOCK LOTS IN THIS AREA 2. ROCKERIES ARE EROSION - CONTROL STRUCTURES, NOT RETAINING WALLS. NATIVE MATERIAL HEMLOCK "xx MUST BE STABLE AND FREE -STAND IN CUT FACE. H04LOCK 1 3. ANY DEVIATION IN DESIGN OR IN PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES MUST BE SUBMITTED HEMLOCK 1=1 im 1= /��j��j�� =��j WITH THE SEAL OF A CIVIL ENGINEER CURRENTLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. CEDAR I� /�ti' NO FOOTINGS OF STRUCTURES 24 WHITE FIR (INCLUDING OTHER ROCKERIES) =i- MAY BEAR IN STIPPLED AREA. PICAL ROCKERY DETAIL FIR 14 -INCH 4 NTS �ES�D41MElEN NUMBER 1 I HEMLOCK I 10 -INCH ON TOP OF 48 -INC14 CEDAR STUMP 2 WHITE RR 26 -INCH 3 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH WHITE RR 8 -INCH 5 ft4 WHITE RR 36 -INCH 6 HEMLOCK 34 -INCH 7 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 8 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 9 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 10 C 48 -INCH 11 HEMLOCK 16 -INCH 12 HEMLOCK 1470 13 HEMLOCK 14 -INCH 14 ALDER 30 -INCH 15 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 16 MAPLE 24 -INCH 17 ALDER 26 -INCH 18 MAPLE 30 -INCH 19 HEMLOCK 36 -INCH 20 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH 21 H04LOCK 24 -INCH 22 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 23 CEDAR 24 -INCH 24 WHITE FIR 18 -INCH 25 FIR 14 -INCH 26 CEDAR 8 -INCH 27 CEDAR 9 -INCH 28 WHITE RR 20 -INCH 29 WHITE RR 20 -INCH 30 WHITE RR 18 -INCH 31 WHITE RR 18 -INCH 32 WHITE RR 16 -INCH 33 RR 36 -INCH 34 CEDAR 26 -INCH 35 RR 22 -INCH 36 HEMLOCK 22 -INCH 37 RR 38 CEDAR 37 -INCH 39 ALDEl? 8 -INCH 40 ?? ?? -INCH 41 MAPLE 24 INCH 42 ?? I ?? -INCH 43 ?? I ?? -INCH APPROXIMATE EDGE OF ROAD / / L / / TELEPHONE / PEDESTAL n. / / / SITE SECTION: PROPOSED 0 = 1' -0" nvvnu%1 1%&1M11111V nnu., I I . . 2 SITE SECTION: PROPOSED SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" TREES, TYP. 41 Canal 2 OVED GREENE RESIDENCE 8 5 0 TALA SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365 FINNE ARCHITECTS 2 1 7 P I N E S T R E E T 12TH FLOOR • PENTHOUSE SEATTLE, WA 98101-1520 TELEPHONE 206/467-2880 FACSIMILE 206 / 467 - 2882 E - M A I L ails @FINNE.com SEE MWED DOCUkIM- 1. DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 2. SEPTIC DESIGN �. �. AUG 2 6 2U01 I _ !r ! ! ! -777 DEPT. it CC NUMBER DATE BY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS PERMIT SET 4112 REGISTERED ARCHITECT N"S C. FINN' STATE OF WASHINGTON SITE PLAN N JOB GREENE SITE PLAN DATE AUGUST 24, 2005 SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" SCALE 1/16" = 1' -0" A 101 'RWED4IMETER NUMBER I 1 I HEMLOCK I 10 -INCH ON TOP OF 48-INCH STUMP 2 WHITE F7R 26 -INCH 3 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH 4 WHITE FIR 8 -INCH 5 WHITE RR 36 -INCH 6 HEMLOCK 34 -INCH 7 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 8 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 9 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 10 CEUIR 48 -INCH 11 HEM 16 -INCH 12 HEMLOCK 14 -INCH 13 HEMLOCK 14 -INCH 14 ALDER 30 -INCH 15 HEMLOCK 10-WCH 16 MAPLE 24 -INCH 17 ALDER 26 -INCH 18 MAPLE 30 -INCH 19 HEMLOCK 36 -INCH 20 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH 21 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 22 HEMLOCK 10 -0VCH 23 CEDAR 24 -MICR 24 WHITE RR 18 -INCH 25 RR 14 -INCH 26 CED4R 8 -INCH 27 CEDAR 9 -INCH 28 WHITE RR 20 -INCH 29 WHITE RR -INCH 30 WHITE RR 18 -INCH 31 WHITE RR 18 -INCH 32 WHITE RR 16 -INCH 33 RR 36 -INCH 34 CEDAR 26 -INCH 35 RR 22 -INCH 36 HEMLOCK 22 -INCH 37 RR 2Z-MACH 38 CEL14R 37 -INCH APPROXIMATE EDGE OF ROAD rA / / / / L _ FOR FIAT BACKSLOPE, SURFACE SHOULD BE IMPERVIOUS do SLOPED TO DRAIN 1 TO 2 MIN 16 ROCKERY NOTES: 11= II- 11= 11 =1I- - 1=11=11= 11=1 - =_ __ _ FREE-DRAINING BACKFILL (MAX 5% FINES 1. ROCKERIES 4' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. r r) g (1 =11= I= 11= 1 =I1 =I I =1 MIN 8 WIDE LAYER OF 2--e QUARRY = I1=I1=11=11=1 Rd I =I I SPALLS ADJACENT TO ROCKERY 2. FOR ROCKERIES BETWEEN 4' AND 6' HIGH, THE INSTALLER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEE NOTES 1 -3 = 11=11=114 41=11 =II A LETTER TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION CERTIFYING THAT THE FOR PERMIT = 11= 11= 11= 11 =11 =11 STABLE CUT FACE N NATIVE SUBGRADE AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS. MATERIAL ( x CERnF�cAtroN = 11= 11= 11= 11= II =11= (SEE NOTE 7). II= 11= 11= I1 =11= 3. ROCKERIES 6' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE ENGINEERING SUPERVISION BY SPECIAL m REQUIREMENTS. II= 11= 11= II =I1 =1 1' (OR LESS) DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL INSPECTOR (UBC 306B), WHICH AT MINIMUM SHALL CONSIST OF INSPECTION AND WRITTEN o - N- 11= 11= 11 =11 =11 MIN 6' COVER OVER PIPE; MIN 2" CERTIFICATION OF SUBGRADE, PLACEMENT OF BASE COURSE AND DRAINAGE, AND 1= 11= 11 =II -I I -11 11= 11= II =II =II GRAVEL UNDER PIPE. FINISHED ROCKERY. HEIGHT 1=11=11 =i I =11= EMI" 3 �= _ _ — — MIN 4' DIAM. PERF. PIPE, MIN 1% 4. ROCK SHALL BE SOUND AND HAVE MINIMUM DENSITY OF 160 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. CONTINUOUS SLOPE TO OUTLET; PIPE MIN 12" do /OR CUT FACE LINED WITH FILTER 5. THE LONG DIMENSION OF ALL ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL. - - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- FABRIC (MIRAFI OR EQUIVALENT). EACH ROCK SHOULD BEAR ON TWO ROCKS IN THE TIER BELOW. FIRM, UNDISTURBED SOIL PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES 1. IMPROVED WALKING SURFACES ABOVE AND ADJACENT TO ROCKERIES OVER 30" IN HEIGHT NO ROADWAYS OR PARKING SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A GUARDRAIL CONFORMING TO UBC 1711. LOTS IN THIS AREA 2. ROCKERIES ARE EROSION- CONTROL STRUCTURES, NOT RETAINING WALLS. NATIVE MATERIAL /� /��j�� ��ju/, MUST BE STABLE AND FREE -ST ND IN CUT FACE. 3. ANY DEVIATION IN DESIGN OR IN PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES MUST BE SUBMITTED 2 WITH THE SEAL OF A CIVIL ENGINEER CURRENTLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. 1= 1= 11= ��/�NO FOOTINGS OF STRUCTURES (INCLUDING OTHER ROCKERIES) =1- MAY BEAR IN STIPPLED AREA. 4 TYPICAL ROCKERY DETAIL SCALE: NTS TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 0 4.6 -FOOT X 4.6 -FOOT POWER VAULT NO. 634058 - 155363 ij I c1 ; 0) / / / f � /r �;- Lot 4 / i / ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK 10' -0" STREAM BUFFER (EACH SIDE, MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK) PER r -rnran r-nAAn Annnniiu FA(:51M1LE 206 / 461 - : 1662 2 SITE SECTION: PROPOSED E - M A I L nits @FINNE.com SCALE: 1/16" = 1' -0" 38 PROPOSED NEW TREES, TYP. 37\ ; 1 1 \ 1 t 35 A6 .` 34 1 Stormwater �`� Require T K AND SEWA PUMP ; �v E IC DESIGN MENTS Y OCATION IN F ELD) , 3 , ,I , , I ;RIF ' )ATIO 3 I , , Hood Canal IGHT LINE STORM WATER TO BEACH PER DRAINAGE, EROSION / AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN , , If 30 2 — ,BATALITE DISH (VERIFY LOCATION) —PROPOSED NEW TREES, TYP. SEE RELATED DOCUMENT'S: 1. DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 2. SEPTIC DESIGN NOTE: FOR ALL SEPTIC SYSTEM PIPING, TANK AND INSTALLATION DETAILS SEE SEPTIC DESIGN DRAWINGS BY CREATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS. NOTE: HOUSE DEMENSIONS ARE TO CORNER OF CONCRETE 10.17.07 CHH ADJACENT HOUSES' SETBAC 09.20.07 CHH SETBACK / HOUSE LOCATI( NUMBER DATE BY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION SET I s0' s �� N89° '34 " \ 36 .24 - �� _ ` y S ED I .� U I U, [u" 3U, 4U' 4112 K - �� I CARPORT -PVC . PROPE LINE T //�/ REGISTERED IDES CK �''� FRAME AND SHED , ARCHITECT BLDG ___ PLASTIC TARP / 7t FTORMG D T- ?�EE12 -/ CH CMP - - _ 'R�6KFF,RY HEIGHT TO i i 5' IL S C. FlNNE - -- �79.97 ------ - - - - -- - ". ,.. V�N ATE OF wASHNGTON I ( �� - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -------------- - -- - EXCEED eL ABOVE I 4tFOOT X 4 -FOOT ( I ADJACEKrGRA�: I ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 12 "X12" CATCH BASIN WITH 8" NOPE OR I GRAVEL DRIVEWAY I HAAAIL WHERE ROCKE IS- - - tr CMP PIPE AROUND GARAGE SLOB TO STORM J ____�.______ - -- r ABOVE GRADE, TYP 3 ; Lot SEWER SYSTEM TIGHTLINE PER, EROSI t------ - - - - -- -------------------- - - - - -- - - -`- 1 "x x x" INDICATES GU DRAIL Ot SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN / STONE ROCKERY RETAINING j� TO BE INSTALLED, TYP / WALL, TYP. SEE DETAIL 4/A1.1 NOT rIEC� SITE PLAN \ / T.O. ROCKERY TO FOLLOW \ / ADJACENT GRADE, TYP. / \ \ � / HOUSE � � = TREES TO BE REMOVED SEWER LINE _ WATERLINE N JOB GREENE / SITE PLAN DATE JUNE 15, 2007 1 SCALE. 1/16" = 1' -0" SCALE 1/16" = 1' -0" Al 01 FOR FLAT BACKSLOPE, SURFACE SHOULD BE IMPERVIOUS & SLOPED TO DRAIN 1 TO 2 MIN 16 ") =:1011- 6 SEE NOTES 1 -3 = == FOR PERMIT ,< CERTIFICATION = E=1 REQUIREMENTS. = =1I= o = 11= II =11= (MIN HEHT) 3 M 2" FIRM, UNDISTURBED SOIL NO ROADWAYS OR PARKING LOTS IN THIS AREA lim V" NUMBER I SPECIES I DIAMETER 1 I HEMLOCK I 10 -INCH ON TOP OF 48 -INCH CEDAR STUMP 2 WHITE FIR 26 -INCH 3 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH 4 WHITE FIR 8 -INCH 5 WHITE FIR 36 -INCH 6 HEMLOCK 34 -INCH 7 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 8 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 9 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 10 CEDAR 48 -INCH 11 HEMLOCK 16 -INCH 12 HEMLOCK 14 -INCH 13 HEMLOCK 14 -INCH 14 ALDER 307INCH 15 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 16 MAPLE 24 -INCH 17 ALDER 26 -IWH 18 MAPLE 30 -INCH 19 HEMLOCK 36 -INCH 20 HEMLOCK 12 -INCH 21 HEMLOCK 24 -INCH 22 HEMLOCK 10 -INCH 23 CEDAR 24 -INCH 24 WHITE FIR 18 -INCH 25 FIR 14 -INCH 26 CEDAR 8 -INCH 27 CEDAR 9 -INCH 28 WHITE FIR 20 -INCH 29 WH17E FIR 20 -INCH 30 WHITE FIR 1873WH_ 31 WHITE FIR 18 -INCH 32 WHITE FIR 16 -INCH 33 AR 36 -INCH 34 CEDAR 26 -INCH 35 FIR 22 -INCi 36 HEMLOCK 2 -INCH 37 FIR 22- 38 CEDAR 37 -INCH 39 ALDER 87 40 ?? ?? -INCH 41 MAPLE 24 -INCH 42 ?? ?? -INCH 43 ?? ?? -INCH APPROXIMATE EDGE OF ROAD tISTABLE OCKERY NOTES: FREE- DRAINING BACKFILL (MAX 5% FINES) 1. ROCKERIES 4' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. MIN 8" WIDE LAYER OF 2 " -4" QUARRY SPALLS ADJACENT TO ROCKERY 2. FOR ROCKERIES BETWEEN 4' AND 6' HIGH, THE INSTALLER OR CONTRACTOR SWILL PROVIDE A LETTER TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION CERTIFYING THAT THE CUT FACE IN NATIVE SUBGRADE AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS. MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 7). 3. ROCKERIES 6' AND OVER IN HEIGHT REQUIRE ENGINEERING SUPERVISION BY SPECIAL 1" (OR LESS) DIAMETER WASHED GRAVEL INSPECTOR (UBC 3066), WHICH AT MINIMUM SHALL CONSIST OF INSPECTION AND WRITTEN MIN 6" COVER OVER PIPE; MIN 2" CERTIFICATION OF SUBGRADE, PLACEMENT OF BASE COURSE AND DRAINAGE, AND GRAVEL UNDER PIPE. FINISHED ROCKERY. ,---MIN 4" DIAM. PERF. PIPE; MI! ,1% 4. ROCK SHALL BE SOUND AND HAVE MINIMUM DENSITY OF 160 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. CONTINUOUS SLOPE TO OUTLET; PIPE & /OR CUT FACE LINED WITH FILTER 5. THE LONG DIMENSION OF ALL ROCKS SFWl BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL FABRIC (MIRAFI OR EQUIVALENT). EACH ROCK SHOULD BEAR ON TWO ROCKS IN THE TIER BELOW. PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES 1. IMPROVED WALKING SURFACES ABOVE AND ADJACENT TO ROCKERIES OVER 30" IN HEIGHT SWILL BE PROTECTED BY A GUARDRAIL CONFORMING TO UBC 1111. 2. ROCKERIES ARE EROSION - CONTROL STRUCTURES, NOT RETAINING WAILS. NATIVE MATERIAL MUST BE STABLE AND FREE -STAND IN CUT FACE. 3. ANY DEVIATION IN DESIGN OR IN PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES MUST BE SUBMITTED 2 WITH THE SEAL OF A CIVIL ENGINEER CURRENTLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. NO FOOTINGS OF STRUCTURES (INClul>INC OTHER ROCKERIES) TYPI�� L ROCKERY DETAIL MAY BEAR IN STIPPLED AREA. 4 SCALE: TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 0 4.6 —FOOT X 4.6 —FOOT POWER VAULT NO. 634058 - 155363 / V i C) Lot. 1 / / / P j / , /Lot 4 0 PAINTED STEEL HANDRAIL STAINLESS STEEL CABLE SPACED AT 3" INTERVALS, TYP. UNDISTURBED SOIL, TYP. 5 ROCKERY + HANDRAIL DETAIL SCALE: NTS XG. I BL�t° _ F I 4 —FOOT X 4 —FOOT ------ I ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER I I 12"X12" CATCH BASIN WITH 8" HDPE OR I 1 NEIGHBORING CMP PIPE AROUND GARAGE TO STORM SEWER WELL SYSTEM TIGHTLINE PER, EROSION i1ND'- - - --- - - -. SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN \� GARAGE \\ WITH ADU APARTMENT !� ABOVE SITE SECTION: PROPOSED r i HANDRAIL WHERE ROCKI �" ABOVE GRADE, TYP "x x x" INDICATES GU TO BE INSTALLED, TYPI ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK 10' -0" STREAM BUFFER (EACH SIDE, MEASURED HORIZONTALLY FROM ORIDINARY HIGH WATER MARK) PER CCDTI!` COAAA AODDAVAI 2 SITE SECTION: PROPOSED 1 1 37 � 1 36 �J 'v '0 /O �' OQ / PROPOSED NEW TREES, TYP. Hood Canal TIGHT LINE STORM WATER TO BEACH PER DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 2 / t I / $ I I / I I / I / PROPOSED NEW TREES, TYf. X = TREES TO BE REMOVED �- =SEWER LINE �- WATERLINE TREENE .ESIDENCE 5 0 TALA SHORE DR :T LUDLOW, WA 98365 FINNE ARCHITECTS 2 1 7 P I N E S T R E E T 12TH FLOOR - PENTHOUSE SEATTLE, WA 98101 -1520 TELEPHONE 206/467-2880 FACSIMILE 206 / 467 - 2882 E - M A I L nils @FINNE.com SEE RELATED DOCl690: 1. DRAINAGE, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 2. SEPTIC DESIGN NOTE: FOR ALL SEPTIC SYSTEM PIPING, TANK AND INSTALLATION DETAILS SEE SEPTIC DESIGN DRAWINGS BY CREATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS. An _2E__ 12.20.05 CHH SEPTIC AND WATER LINES NUMBER DATE BY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS PRICING SET 4112 REGISTERED ,/NtLS G. FI E STATE OF WASHINGTON ,P7f , /A/ 7 49& SITE PLAN N JOB GREENE SDATE OCTOBER 31, 2005 A1/16" = 1' -0" SCALE 1/16" = 1' -0" 101 EYE IN CABLE TO ENCIRCLE A MINIMUM OF FOUR PIECES OF 14 GR40 REBAR AS SHOWN EYE TO BE SHOP FORMED WITH A COMPRESSION CRIMP. 24" MIN ((i " /G MIN `• a INLET TEE EMBED END OF PIPE CONCRETE THRUST IN CONCRETE SUMCIENT BLOCKING FOR TO PREVENT ENTRY OF CABLE ANCHORAGE SOIL INTO PIPE. TRENCH EXCAVATION AT THE TOP OF THE BLUFF SHALL BE CAREFULLY PERFORMED WITH THE MACHINE SET WELL BACK FROM THE EDGE. THE PRORLE OF THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE ROUNDED TO MATCH THE BENDING RADIUS OF THE PIPE WHERE THE PIPE DAYLIGHTS OUT OF THE SLOPE AS SHOWN. SYSTEM IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SINGLE 1? z WALL (FLEXIBLE) CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE " 1 \ Ek PIPE AS MANUFACTURED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ADS) OR APPROVED SUBSTITUTE THE o < PIPE is NOT TO BE FACTORY PERFORATED. JOINTS \, SHALL BE FACTORY ATTACHED (WELDED) FLANGES ALLOWING BOLTED CONNEC77ONS OF PIPE SECTIONS. \ 774ESE JOINTS WILL REQUIRE A SPECIAL ORDER FROM A ADS TEES AT TOP AND BOTTOM SHALL HAVE FLANGED N JOINTS EXCEPT THAT THE LEG OF 771E INLET IEEE AT THE TOP CONNEC77NG TO INCOMING PIPE (WITH OR d WITHOUT AN ADAPTER) NEED NOT BE FLANGED. Cn o TOP PROFILE HORIZONTAL DISPERSION UNIT TO BE LOCATED ABOUT THE LEVEL OF HIGHER HIGH TIDE AND A MINIMUM OF THREE FEET ABOVE THE BEACH LEVEL. a v 4 0 0 v � � a a R a a a CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) BAR SCREEN WIN 14, GR40 BARS I ) AT 2" ON- CENTER SECURELY WELDED TOGETHER. PVC PIPE REQUIRES A FRAME TO BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE PIPE INLET. TOP VIEW (FRAME NOT SHOWN) --2 SIT SIDE VIEW ALL ONE HOOP OF 14 GR40 REBAR TOP & BOTTOM OF THRUST BLOCK 6' t L �E-2• TEE AND PIPE TO BE 4 BARS INSIDE 6" DIAMETER HDPE LOOP IN CABLE SINGLE WALL CORRUGATED PIPE 24" MAX TRENCH MD7H TOP OF BLUFF N-,. ADAPTER TO 07HER PIPE MATERIALS, IF NECESSARY Ix Z W FROM o 0 FLOWS VWER 2 N 25' MIN = 4 FRONT (WA7ERWARD) FACE OF THRUST BLOCK TO BE POURED DIRECTLY AGAINST UNDISTURBED SUPPORT CABLE INSIDE PIPE TO BE SOIL EXCEPT FOR 24" MAX FOR PIPE TRENCH 112 INCH STAINLESS. TOP PLAN FA IffU -T TO STORM SEWER PIPE MATCH INVERT OF ROADSIDE OITCH. DEEPEN DITCH AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE ADEQUATE D TALA SHORE DRIVE. COVER INLET WITH / BAR ACREEN PER DETAIL. V / � E / O / Cry / / It BEVELED & SCREENED CULVERT DETAIL SCHEMATIC ONLY - NO SCALE THE INTERNAL TEE STRUCTURE MAY BE FABRICATED OF THREADED BLACK IRON COMPONENTS (SHOWN HERE) OR WELDED OF STAINLESS STEEL TUBING. INTERNAL DIAMETER OF INTERNAL TEE STRUCTURE TO BE 3" MINIMUM. LARGER DIAMETER MAY BE NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EYE OF THE SUPPORT CABLE. \ HORIZONTAL DISPERSION UNIT N INSTALL BOLTED BLANK FLANGES 1'�► AT EACH END BOLTED FLANGE JOINT DRILL HOLES IN THE HORIZONTAL DISPERSION UNIT AS INDICATED IN BOTTOM PROFILE DETAIL I ((� EYE OF CABLE TO BE SHOP FORMED WITH A COMPRESSION I CRIMP AND INSERTED INTO THE 1 VERTICAL MEMBER OF THE 40 INTERNAL TEE STRUCTURE. INSERT STAINLESS STEEL ROD THROUGH EYE TO SECURE THE LPL, DISPERSION UNIT: TC� FLANGED OR WELDED JOINTS 5' 6' STAKE THE HORIZONTAL DISPERSION UNIT TO THE FACE OF THE BLUFF WITH A MINIMUM OF FOUR EACH, 14 REBARS SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE UNIT. BOTTOM ELEI/A77ON 1 " STAINLESS STEEL ROD IN- SIDE HORIZONTAL MEMBER OF INTERNAL TEE STRUCTURE (5 112 FT LONG) lF BLACK IRON PIPE IS USED TO FABRIC47E THE INTERNAL TEE STRUCTURE, THE TEE MAY BE REPLACED WITH A CROSS TO FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF THE EYE OF THE CABLE. HIGH BLUFF ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEM 45 DEGREE BEND SHOWN, _.- CONTR40OR MAY ADJUST GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TO MATCH CONDITIONS AND — �-- . aTHErr unurrES. GRAVEL DRIVEWAY DRILL 20 EACH 2" DIAMETER HOLES EVENLY SPACED ON THE OUTER- -7 DEGREES OF ?IZONTAL ION UNIT AS 0 DRILL 40 EACH to DIAMETER HOLES EVENLY DISTRIBUTED IN LOWERMOST 90 DEGREES OF HORIZONTAL DISPERSION UNIT AS SHOWN. BOTTOM PROFILE v 20' 30' 40' -61��-z z- EXPIRES -Z 5'D1 W z LJ W 38 cr^^ !! 37 V 35 36 4 �- /J�` LL.i 4., w m °`` F- oQ 0 � m � w ry Q Q Hood Canal �' 31 O lE OF PIPE AT TOP OF' BLUFF - 464.25 n' 30 •r 0 !7 /S /1 ATj04, 1^'_L� 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET W r I N r Z ,. oo N w C_r) d Cn o o N o0 rn ry � o o ~ W � z o I = cn .o w ry a ao, ,o CL W � a o m S W v� � w r ° o cn W z LJ W 38 cr^^ !! 37 V 35 36 4 �- /J�` LL.i 4., w m °`` F- oQ 0 � m � w ry Q Q Hood Canal �' 31 O lE OF PIPE AT TOP OF' BLUFF - 464.25 n' 30 •r 0 !7 /S /1 ATj04, 1^'_L� 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET W r I N r