Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2012-00129 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION MRLeAl2-00p09� Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD12-00129 Received Date: 4/24/2012 SITE ADDRESS: 301 SHORE DR PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: MARA I MAUCH PHONE: 503-781-9699 1758 NW CAITLIN TER PORTLAND OR 97229-4695 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 1+ PARCEL NUMBER: 821233001 Section: 23 Township: 28 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: STEVE STRUNK PHONE: 360-710-5417 1591 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SILVERDALE WA 98383 PROJECT DESCRIPTIOP NSFR W/ATT GARAGE &A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,980 VALUATION 282,914.00 ADD'L: 547 HEAT TYPE: EEE CODE EDITION: 2009 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N SHORELINE: GARAGE: 652 CONST TYPE: DECK: 90 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: CON WATER SYSTEM: 36705 BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: 0 Exist: 0 Prop: 3 Prop: 3 Total: 3 Routing Date: - -12 Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $2,018.55 LYK 04/24/12 131670/71 Plan Check $1,312.06 LYK 04/24/12 131670/71 State Building Code $4.50 LYK 04/24/12 131670/71 Potable Water Application $64.00 LYK 04/24/12 131670/71 Total: $3,399.11 e0 JEFFERSON COUNTY D ECEOVE (4 1 ,411 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•VVashington 98368 APR 2 4 2012 360/379-4450• 360/379-4451 Fax 4strincot www.cojefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopment JEFF SON COUNTY 1 • . IF CO M, DEVELOPMENT Master Permit Application MLA: ammonium Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): #V41( t. *Wet"-— ME \el Tax Pinel Number: — 731 — 001 Property Size: (= Site Address and/or Directions to Property: s Property Owner(s)of Ftecord:, MIKAr 1 MA 441 MA LICA Telephone: ro3 Yl- 949 el Fax einat r4AAA 3 M4!Li@ C p4Att.-COr't Miffing Address: 11 St f41 . CAI1LItJ 1e*A41 frOLIIJI•4 o - ¶)o. ApplIcantlAgent(if different from owner): T651N- 5712-u 1,-) Telephone: 3(.O - D -V -1 Fax email: 3 S LI 1(@ (.../t.A.Ci COM Mailing Address: LU ertO 4 idlIIL4411r 3 What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies Building 0 Critical Areas Stewardship Plan O Demolition Permit 0 Variance(Mhew,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) Single Family t=4-' Attached Detached 0 Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CI** O Manufactured Home 0 , •• 0 Discretionary-17 or Unnamed Use Classification O Commercial* 0 Special Use(Essential Public Fealties)" O Change of Use 0 Boundary Line Adjustment O Address 0 Road Approach 0 Short Plat** O Home Business 0 Cottage Industry 0 Bbicliqg Site Plan** 0 Propane 0 tixig Plat 4* 0 Sign 0 Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRoyAmenchnents** 0 Mowed'Yee Use Consistency Analysis 0 Plat Vacation/Alteration 0 Stom'nwster Management 0 Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** 0 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* 0 Shoreline Management Substantial Development** 0 Temporary Use 0 Shoreline Management Variance 0 Wireless Telecommunication• 0 Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment 0 Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium 0 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment May make a Pre-AapNoation Connwance 0 Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a PreAppacation Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate ITOVIP STRA41( to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). _ X OWNER SIGNATURE Date: I( I/ " - By signing this application form,the ownedagent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments.is true and correct to the best of his,her or as knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the cumedagent with respect to this emigration packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,Indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,pigments.court costs,reasonable attorney's tees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this perrnft. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the spear:oboe Suit he or she wants prior notice. -- X Signature: ‘ , Date: ; The action or actions Applicant wilt undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively Impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential lake'clan endangered species as those terms am defined in the federal taw known as the 'Endangered Species Act"or'ESA.'Jetkirson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued wet not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can tile a lawsuit on behalf elan endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she ant holds individual and non-trd"able tesPorldifftv for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has reed this discbhner and sirs and dates It below. Signature: 4-4 .- - - Date: -I ! _ . _ BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project.i (; XSignature: i,t , , , Date: ; 13 ) i GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: NA Asti HI cOp.i r PHONE (. Z O) I-1-If 3 p v F AX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: F•0.buy 4 yrJ K f+-tG1'lrr) , LA 9$34L EMAILNAnz N eMMtF7_Q ,/(.f)I•JC SD iul)o.,S•COM Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: X New X Wood Existing: .� l Sewer 3 -1 Addition :I Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System 1 Alteration/Remodel Li Concrete Total k -3" Height: X Individual System Repair r Masonry SO' SEP Permit# SEP03-0011 Demolition D Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: •i Private well G Two Party_iType of Heat Proposed: X Public C -trer/U C Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes I No If this is a Pro pane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: 1 1 Underground Tank Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: 2.S11 Cal(_- 1 Heat Stove P Cook Stove ,KWoodstove 1 Fireplace Insert I Hot Water Tank 1 Pellet Stove 1 Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount ,Revision Main Floor Heated I q g O o ,w\•\a° EH Bld App Review: 76- 6 2n0 Floor Heated � �1kbW►1. Consistency Review Z Z Z, d o Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine pddlgonal QA.I � Q_ `-j— I ,p d Heated Basement Plan Check fee: 3 ' -2.!0 Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: 4/. S Other Unheated SPot Water Review fee: /63. 00 Garage/Carport bJ L \1`6 SUBTOTAL Y2-5.Y. 9 / Decks C V J Q...C b O I VA Z' 9M/Rd Appro•Cft fie: 0 CAN'f•CY Other CO 0 Q-CL(AQ0 C C S L"/'" 304a- 40Z\ '1 J TOTAL: $f 23 %.1/ Receipt Number. /3/& 7 o a. 3 ,' 7/ ' - Cash/Check Number: <=/- -2 —/Z ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) cN s 8 ate: .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to fin" 'Y" Q i ZS�f UOO•--• le Initials: • % . *. V$ aai >.. � a�"� .a_.-,�m ��3 a�t �w'a. a-a�..s � =m ed 4.a d.��a j.., n w:��e a o �..:o=�:.a< w't r tea l �.ao w A g.m� g• m a.:..a sw : a a � ...i ;_ »-w b..,f:....� g''... �#, . k ° a w k m y. a.. , t 0 ao: � :� mwa . m. veg o �a , A r a m. &. e t o ° a n ms� a a §.s a Aw ,0:1.0.-,,,,,,r,,-� am w0.. wa @g�a aaa.� aWw. g 'A4 aa. w. .a.s . P ': r � ° m 9.to '*. ,,-a a- r M :P o Y . w . a S .$w,.ww .1m , �r g e L� waa d � k �A-¢ , . ,�g. , ew.;,*aw ,fi �� a aw� vL ta a w � ,. � w ��,re ar�, ;� r,; : m :.a' � k7 ,�� b a.. .,T^ gy.,; � � �m� w :,gAK . w,�sW pew � w a . .,, , w sa � e w� a a a m� wq � �-�� �G ���� �A, S®R i F �r g,e, . �� . 3" ,. . Ni k mAa .om ws � ���� da a ��,weFaw �A.,k w wP, ,wmA�A° s m�w a wA,a €� p a� ilAA re � W".MPA A110, Pm�,� d��w 9 am s,e„,,ma',a. 0:40101'2N s P r ."` a.a.w. . e .''yy$w ws,�w 1,1 w e:. ( a � . . �' „: t§ 4 w are s wa N ; MM@ �p m s� 44ii t a %ID� m I �.ii [ S al g o , a� � A `, r a e er ^, � e. as and tw t' C 9 m 12 a .§ ,. � re ,®� vw,, P..0.. .m �,�� ,me�>wo aAw, re. R ,. u ;,,, Nen a ,.N . mv , , . m 301 East 6th Street,Suite 1 & ASSOCIATES Port Angeles,Washington 98362 INCORPORATED (360)417-0501 Fax(360)417-0514 E-mail:zenovic @olympus.net October 3, 2012 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Site Development for Mauch Parcel No. 821-233-001 Dear Department of Community Development: This office has inspected the installation the drainage improvements for the referenced project. I hereby certify that the construction has been completed in conformance with the approved Stormwater Site Plan and associated documents and is now ready for use. Please give me a call if you have any questions or if you need further information. Sincerely, Zenovic &Associates, Inc. %enM. Zenovic, P.E. Principal Engineer Cc: Mara Mauch Pacific West Construction Fc: JN 05031 D E O II V . OCT - 42012 jfl1 JEFFERSON COUNTY , DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARA I MAUCH 1758 NW CAITLIN TER PORTLAND OR 97229-4695 DATE ISSUED: 7/2112-- DATE EXPIRES:112-M MLA NUMBER: MLA12-00091 PROJECT PLANNER: David Wayne Johnson PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NSFR W/ATT GARAGE &A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK NSFR W/ATT GARAGE &A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR SFR PROJECT LOCATION: arcel 821 233 001, Section 23, Township 28N, Range 1E, WM, located at 301 Shore Drive, Port Ludlow 98365 CONDITIONS: 1.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 2.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3)gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 3.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 4.) A Geotechnical Report dated May 20, 2009 prepared by Zenovic&Associates was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A building setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top or toe of the geologic hazard to the proposed single family residence. A 75 foot setback for the stormwater infiltration trench shall be measured from the top of the shoreline bank. 5.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 6.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 7.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the landslide/geohazard buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 8.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 9.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPS)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPS shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 10.) A Stormwater Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 11.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 12.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 13.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 14.) Building setback from Shore Drive is no less than 20 feet. Side and rear setbacks are no less than 5 feet. Shoreline setback is no less than 50 feet. 15.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 16.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 17.) Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) See SPAAD ZON09-00076 for zoning and critical area approval. 3.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 3, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: suburbar shoreline designation; stable& unstable recent slide shoreline slope stability; seismic; severe landslide hazard area; coastal SIPZ. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge(primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 6.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polic} (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 7.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 4,280 square feet of impervious surface and 5,080 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require the project applicant submit a stormwater plan meeting Minimum Requirements#1 through#5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The stormwater plan shall address measures to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction and shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Building Permit application on April 24, 2012 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated July 2, 2012 and revised August 7, 2012 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a New Single Family Residence with Attached Garage and 250 Gallon Propane Tank only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service(http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. C \t '1012 UD dmi istrator MLA12-00091 it \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_IssuePermit_U.rpt 7/2/2012 Page 4 of 4 , 100/ N, - ‘7. , .-- - , , „\ , N % .1111k , . ....4 i , k , - a6) , -C C7 r-J v-i A `)k PP11,0VVD At-10 ro sit/0 A 14- a Pitoth An otait-)11i Aiisla 1- 'S EPo 1-00 a-1 9 r p F S ------- ------ C3 , 'It, 1 iteStlibkiii li 4, C- I 4ki I ' I ' I , / ----- ,_ ,-- 1 - , , v) NOIL7-1-1 S0 ”, AOPPAPP- /0 f-t(-14,4frip, .4 u„pgattpo'JD. > L0c1-17r) ce-rir to'cLou. ec;Qt*,..... ...,_ ____Pbo (Y.9/) 1 --- r)1 P Ito P. # .poei) I Pito pooit i, • rq syi r , 17111 L.(tiq 1,43- ViCOT 0/ • 444r 2-52:1 .. _ sr . S ... 1 os-r4 u.so S ZP1-1 c, .10 is.)K. SCht-Gr : 1" i I 1 I I - I- Pomp 1 1 -)ft-ttrii 4 nrikifi Phucv • 7... 1 ....— 0, + 54 , i 1 C-Y IQ-IA. GA!IL W TOLIL/411 .... oll:I-LA.4 0/L . ci—17-11 , _/- -------____----' _ p ______ ______ ------_ oi ___,------ Pilitcet ft* % t I -"LS - 001 ---,-, 30 -.....,..,......._., Dlithwo AI .. ''''lliiMIJ Slitiliok I,41 V161-) 41) Si t.‘.I. WA 1%1%1 I0 ...........•••■,...... 14 I Cu ‘,..i witg..: „,,,..,...............„„ •- I 0' H 4 00 '' c-6.-ctru, $, ilL' g; rl 1 II ' I1 .. • ill• 4 ti,, w 4, �a o 1 a e' • ,2 � �2 r 4 r 10,0%110 \ U ,6,0%„00.. 710 I i' I 1ox o.,ro te..\.\\ ,,o,o%„oo%x o.nro .A I, � _ P 2 P CO < —2 [ CI A. 1 pN P a a P Q f lc -`Z.- oll ill, i x r — — — — __ 4. > 4, \ \ \rti v \ ° x—n ° ` , I moo O ; o N _ u ;1 I iii I oo. I m kl 0 I= o MIMI MEWL :i •1p 1 1.-''s 1 \\I /\ '.o`I jE1 p u Ali S m i.. 3 \ 1 i A \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ o \i0 MI m O . U V \\ y N P ,A F ° ..,f. °: , o 1 ° +,, 9 m o i : . \ J N AMY P P P i P MAucU 6/...,D I/ 1Z \ marsh menne estimating&design• 1 - I. `u_I W VI in O z 0 Iu ti. < 1?. (r.." 0 > X � � �,,a E 1 Ua I0 � _ __ z 0 rill K X z Tito �� 1- — 4 N _ F. O ni 0 O r 1 0 1148 04) m O UL ti 0 in L V = w D i En 1 U ry � ta m2 z 4 ut 11141Z46 I z N 0 ID L. IDq II Da tab ,;.�•. i ) •zz2. ....) 2 I i I if _ _0 v ,~ AO J N1/4 kk"-- Cil 6 Q V 4 / U O I O - 1 1 I ._..,4„..„_Ail I I I a ii MI illi Nol ! C:5 g 3 n g, X.), 4 r —c'") \--- t CZL. \423 0 \,.' N t ' l 1 • • V JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT(RCW 90.58) PROPONENT: MARA I MAUCH 1758 NW CAITLIN TER PORTLAND OR 97229-4695 DATE ISSUED: July 02, 2012 DATE EXPIRES: July 02, 2013 CASE NUMBER: SDP12-00024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR SFR WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: PUGET SOUND PROJECT LOCATION: arcel 821 233 001, Section 23, Township 28N, Range 1E, WM, located at 301 Shore Drive, Port Ludlow 98365 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1.) See BLD12-00129 for building permit approval. 2.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 3.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3)gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 4.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 5.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top or toe of the Landslide Hazard Area. 6.) A Geotechnical Report dated May 20, 2009 prepared by Zenovic & Associates was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 50-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top or toe of the geologic hazard to the proposed single family residence. 7.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 8.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 9.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the landslide/geohazard buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 10.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 12.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 13.) The site plan as submitted with the Shoreline Exemption application on April 24, 2012 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated July 2, 2012 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 14.) This approval is for a Shoreline Exemption for a Single Family Residence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 15.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that "takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a "take" g p 9 occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service(http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 16.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section JCC 18.25.090(5), which exempts the "construction by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence [in shoreline jurisdiction] for the owner's or owner's family's use..." from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements under certain provisions. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 17.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. • rtment of Community evelop ent Staff c: Department of Ecology, Shorelands Office, Rick Mraz Washington State Department of Fish &Wildlife, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Bridget Kaminski-Richardson STEVE STRUNK ICI \\tidemark\data\forms\F_SDP_Exemption.rpt 7/2/2012 , too' ...c P (74; 3\ lk &p40 WO rt-ISIWO 0, PLIMQVI 01,111$41M, OA ll' SEPol-001-)9 4(4 r-1 F 1 __ (r) i --------.---- ? ---------- 40 L..... ..= -- wault t, 1 1 t kiao 1 I , 4, 2 , or, .......,,,„ -,,),-- C I r-- 'k I ' * IC. .4,7 / -e. it;r•s, . 1 //. 1 - I 0, 0 00-11-1 c,.. 1 --------A°11""A (01..(9S kik, - Loc1 ) Crfr to(-ILIttrID, ,4 -titkacii L I 10'covi. (Y391) 1,50 <iv-. ,,, , Ifli Plup0oe'\ 0„ 1 1,1/31°' ! Ply. 2 14,1 -1:3 0 11110,.(A q f ' , `1411-4611 j! vl ,, * (42)/ J ArZI ue, C=3 1 - -.----6--I e, NS*4643( 1-4 NCi 1, , • r4 ea i -- ""*"- Z -.) _5_,___Ei --1,- r.SN qt , 3c414 : 111 7:: tio.° li t 1 I )(iitoi 4 Mikpi ighau ' S - . , . . . lk A i 41 0,0 04 V 54' ,,, 1 i s-x to.w. cA ilitti 7-04l.4a ti I c,,r4."- ' 't:fk,...1, 7 • , ______7-- 0/7._ . ...: 5,1) _______ , ..- A/Ltda.. itt. "S a 1 -IS- 00 1 , i ,...________ wil 1, ,---,„ I , ____ ..,_ Dithitio Pr. .1-63)flfeJ s-moulc 4 SILU, laA Iteng CO 146-110-Ctill W.TwIalVtilk.., 0' 1-1 00 GO„slat_ -= 5ePr1lc.. !it :I; Nor gee4 1 °N coy, JEFFERSON COUNTY ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax - (� http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ _ Ov Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Te 1111 ,• � � Project Overview 0���V, ' �Q�o 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate po ityi and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. In the developed condition, a 2600 s.f. single family residence and 845 s.f driveway will be constructed. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. The existing topography slopes toward Hood Canal with grades of about 1-5% up to the bluff line, from there it is steeper than 1:1 down to the ordinary high water line of Hood Canal 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. Existing vegetation on-site consists of approximately 25%wooded, native vegetation, and 75%lawn. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. According to the Geotechnical report completed in May of 2009 by Zenovic& Associates, Inc. existing soils on-site are consistent with Alderwood soil types as shown on the SCS soil survey maps, with the exception that the surficial gravelly sandy loam is typically deeper than is typical for Alderwood soils, extending up to 60". Alderwood soils are typically moderately well-drained, dominantly strong sloping to steep, gravelly soils underlain by glacial till. See attached geotechnical report for further information. 5. Describe the existing site hydrology (i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable, and indicate acreage of each. All stormwater runoff on-site sheet flows over the existin. bluff lain n`1 Hood Canal '; 11.741_ _it 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the propo d ": X alter 2012 sem i 4 uaVOl2cl �. � , 1, i Yri1UO3 i C IMMIKUI1HD Ml1M r r The re-development is not anticipated to cause any excess noise. The property will maintain a rural residential state. 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e.,environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands,streams, steep slopes, etc.) on the site. Indicate location on the site map. The site lies on the shores of Hood Canal, which contains tidal wetlands up to the mean high or higher water mark. Aside from the tidal wetlands mentioned above,there is a steep bluff along the eastern portion of the property. 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site,including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands,lakes, steep slopes,etc.). The site lies in a rural residential area and is surrounded by existing homes on parcels of similar size. Aside from the tidal wetlands mentioned above, there is a steep bluff along the eastern portion of the property. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces,pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. 9. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed(i.e.,per BMP T5.30 in the Manual) or,if not, what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. All of the roof runoff will be tight-lined into an infiltration trench,which is sized to handle 100%of the site runoff according to the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM). Runoff from the driveway will not be controlled. Because the site is a medium project, it is only required to comply with minimum requirements 1-5 of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW). The site is in a coastal SIPZ which requires infiltration. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities,describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] This is "medium"project and is not required to provide runoff treatment. 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. This project intends to fulfill the "medium"project requirements, which include minimum requirements 1-5 of the SWMMWW. 12. Describe the flow control system. All runoff from the proposed residence will tight lined to an infiltration trench. Flow control is not required because the project is considered a "medium" project. 13. Describe the water quality system. The site is not required to provide water quality treatment because it is a "medium" project, and the small additional PGIS does not exceed the threshold for runoff treatment. 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. There are no conveyance systems present on-site. 15. Describe the source of fill material,physical characteristics of fill material, and deposition of excess material. Fill material has not yet been sourced,but must meet requirements of Section 9- 03.10 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications, current edition. 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. The foundation material underneath all structures shall be moisture conditioned to within 3 percent of optimum moisture content and shall be placed in loose, horizontal layers. The thickness of layers shall not exceed 8" for compaction by heavy equipment and 4"for compaction by hand-operated mechanical compactors. Layers shall be compacted to a dense state equaling at least 95%of the maximum dry density,using the modified proctor, per ASTM D1557. Prior to the placement of fill below structures, any and all groundwater and surface water shall be drained or pumped from areas to be filled. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. Top rock layer shall be crushed surfacing top course that substantially conforms to Section 9-03.9(3)of the WSDOT Standard Specifications,top course gradation. 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. Site disturbance is expected to be limited to the building area. The septic system has already been installed. Any topsoil that is removed during excavation shall be stockpiled on-site and re-used during restoration. Any soil disturbed during site development shall be restored per BMP T5.13 (see attached). 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for"large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals here. N/A 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. N/A 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements, describe those conditions or restrictions here. N/A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and of site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPPP)Best Management Practices (BMPs)Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at section 2.5.2 of the Manual (beginning on page 2-15). 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. Clearing limits will be establish prior to any site work taking place. 2. Establish Construction Access. A construction entrance will be installed per BMP C107 and is noted on the site plan. 3. Control Flow Rates. Soil disturbance shall be limited to the building pad. Any runoff leaving the site shall have to pass through existing vegetation and silt fence,providing flow control benefits. 4. Install Sediment Controls. Silt fence will be installed just east of the building site to prevent sediment from leaving the site. See site plan for details. 5. Stabilize Soils. All disturbed soils shall be restored per BMP T5.13 and stabilized per BMP C120. 6. Protect Slopes. There are no steep slopes on-site, other than the existing bluff which will not be disturbed. 7. Protect Drain Inlets. There are no drain inlets present on-site. 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. No Channels will be constructed on-site. 9. Control Pollutants. There are no pollutants anticipated to be present on-site.No fueling of heavy equipment and vehicles will be allowed. 10.Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). No groundwater is anticipated to be encountered during the project,however, if groundwater is encountered,the dewatering of soils known to be free of contamination will trigger BMPs to trap sediment and reduce turbidity. At a minimum, geotextile fabric socks/bags/cells will be used to filter this material. Other BMPs to be used for sediment trapping and turbidity reduction include the following: Concrete Handling(BMP C151) Use of a sedimentation bag, with outfall to a ditch or swale for small volumes of localized dewatering. 11.Maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs). All temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be maintained and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with each particular BMPs specifications 12.Manage the Project. From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of the local permitting authority that silt-laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the site. All BMPs shall be inspected,maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Site inspections shall be conducted by a person who is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g.,streams,lakes, wetlands,residential areas,roads). As mentioned above, a tidal wetland lies directly to the east of the project. b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). Most of the site runoff sheet flows from the east to the west before discharging directly into Hood Canal. In the developed condition, site runoff from the roof will be tight lined to an infiltration trench. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. As mentioned above, a tidal wetland and seasonal stream lie adjacent to the property to the west and east respectively. b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. None Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils (e.g., erodibility, settleability, permeability, depth,texture,soil structure). No erosion problem areas present on-site. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence Install erosion control measures Construct foundation for house/garage addition Construct house/garage addition Trench for utility connection Final stabilization of site b. Construction phasing(if proposed) N/A Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30 (page 2-21 of the Manual). I. Provide a proposed construction schedule. Construction will take place from May- October II.Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. none b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. none Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. Mara and Mike Mauch are the property owners and will be responsible for all bonds and financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. None proposed. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations r 1 Ii Appendix A — Stormwater Site Plan I II I 1D1= I _ _: LL ' I m m-1 i z Z -,_�I cl D A i I I 1 I I I 1 t..) 1111111 n I 1.1 1 1 1 d J ' • ~ 1 . i I I I ' I I § 1 in RI co m uuIIII ; Fr_i 1--] ■ I N fl ' P9I O Z � N C D .0 0 ,-01 rt-) Z`'A• I I > mD c� > m Mo Z mrM �c I ii5 j o � m Z ;�; _ 1 z 07 > I jay ;'! �� O 2' f6" MIN. I II y — III lip- _ I I • PA LL -co 0 1--1 •t• Il•4 I O N m N m O I ([e,.• •41,.,0j 2 0 I H Z D y Z _d i ;ia3 \\ wI �c�Z GI Z F-3 �ml ���illl IIIIII �ll HI D ' m�O-r.a 11_1 I n ODn � Dy�X I to 11y�� r 0 33 33 m 333 ' I r o LI .'n O r X14! f7 0 2 1 n _(m� _�v / I I Co v •r I I N in A .89 ,LZ / /,LLI, I ' I �o m AF CO c -to r z r,-o *OUZI 1 I rn -00 >3•E,..4 A I Z y°pr- ✓ m 0 I z • m 3,u) A 1M Nf*IZA > Ooc at°0e z�p� D � r ;z m� , o,_y)N N Cl) • f7w 1 r mn- fnx F� . ! t.I C)'0-N DZ a = °•••. O ,�AZ0 AO U Nom. / �..! , A� d111111 r.,� I t1.1.l�,'.� .,h 1 • . i it I d - Z dr.Oi• I � •••••• O y • oq4'.el•040 ;'7 in I 'O � •.,•we 00 O • INI D t ••414;44 0 - NZ ov- ' 0 I �•"t sZAD I✓ I -2N Cn n?nm iLt j.••.6.....• • iW• �vr 1,./ m v n 1-3 r XI 1 �] 's• �•... ow PI � � � , m� �---� ail, • i m — o x i O 0 x Z �I p I) CA , P�� AZ\x \ a 0. H 7 o CA 2_ 0 A ` 1 D '� �x� 1 In N'0 N >ZO O Xv; r-1* N= ■��00Will + § 0 c TITLE: DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR MAUCH, PN 821-233-001 m �•-.� �`Ssi∎ Z m m m i �o-� Srq'�;o��'' \ SITE PLAN 1I. �• N O) a !fir mro �, , s,. 01 Oo Iv to O as N ���`y���e \ %cif'? Co v1 N : O CLIENT: c,. `�'o, PACIFIC WEST CONSTRUCTION ZS° AES PHONE: (360) 417-0501 I SILVERDALE, WA 98383 FAX: (360)417-0514 INCORPORATED EMAIL: ZENOVICOZENOVIC.NET N A w N 12" MIN. 2. MIN. ;yOtA ZC_,2Wy Op.Z°!r OZXlZ Zzz' > �I'�'-r r• ♦.....♦ m tAt>mr zD OW o>o Y _IIi:,,0)4;'" ......1 0Q o N-1 r �t-0 NmDZ z 0 — • .. 1.1 OL�mW .1�W mOr AZO �'aZ> EN O 7 (A Il ,/,k:i"��.�.�.�•�.�.�4 Z M g> c0i>m<co< z v; C "'_ z m rn o ,i _ 7:,:,,�����������.1 -o z 0 ?ti D>r°+10 0 0 W O Z O D>N c O � S 49,m s^�.': ►•�•�❖.•..�.�1 0nN OOZZt�*N MZZ C_fy rg=0 os m� I1 ',.1�7.,•►••♦♦♦1♦•�♦1 W �Z y r �m r- ow O O z I D Z W I I r'�+"r j•Q. .�./ -� r °O D- > 0 CO Z to µ:0a`0 _.4,r r .�.����������♦1 r�� W°pmy 1n mrZ 1nDZx .Z a0 II 't:�.+► . .•�•�•�1ps2 mm : -<m OGo '-�O NO Z r>- F� r - I Ij,',,,,, .�.�.�.�.�.�.�1 c�a N-10 RI -i2y r>'1- 1O>= Z>� nA>n —'� x �mO —I IR"4✓ ►q�.�.�.�.�.�.�1 r �.nt� myZOD r'1mD DOC �O�O 11T-�t� C -1X ,;1•, t.�.�.�.�.�.�.� P1>IV pg 1 1 x N I( ;tck',- Wr' m+l Zxc)tC 4Nr AZr • r-oo ,^ O Ar r,�y;"'',�.�.........../ co., Co a x n_ Q;m m> 0 W o4' Z m° v' D D°D _4,y;I I s' �j�j�j�j������1 > N X °. z z W> D tom v t'.,.;,,. ►.❖.Q•�•Qj/ N mm-eW yx t) �m� II • f7 N A 0-0 m g D ,p-o o r A rsl Z !•;r';1�j�j�j��..❖1 2 D 1 mom.X)>m W Z W 2 O W m 7C> Z it ��.�.�.�.�.�/ Oo n° -(N - Omis >Z2 0-'1 i{;(:,t'v*'►�.�1�.�.�.�.1 a 2-1D 0 Zm wNr y0y DOm i i ►.�.�.�.�.�.�1 "'1ri' o 0>Q-41- W W 1 �Om P-",(.1 < 1 O Z O Z O w 0 m W W —�,P:?.k,'*❖.❖.❖.4 0n zxy8 alo s II ♦.....1 r41 NWM, -1 O > li r.:''''►❖.❖ ••1 0 m O D m N )I.'. 4.•; N 0 H r—ti_ 7,':4 .❖.❖.❖.•/ — 4�;:∎...... 4 Zmr i I ;';r V. ..,.,.,.,.,.,.,1 A 27> II_; � ........1 D ,� —III xi, —I I IF:• 'i 1 z g p C O OA --4' DSrN C7� :;, ,,,, v fr7:y > 0 •m D. t/)0 'xi 0m Z$O D_ Cr- WZm� Apr- 0 n Z "'1 073> mm m0N Z D 01 m� Dm IAC TAB x° Z% n yry-I OMz Np ZO -,rtn ym0 I`..,.1I xD WC-4 D (ay Z ro = N O L J• D m 9 Z y 3I >Qio m1 {O -<vmo y_,0 m� DZ n A to OZ �D�A Z�Z /1 02% lIz 9A� yyf) mzi D,irnm '�mz ` J N0 Zmy Zx, 0 °Oy) O mm 0 m�y Ox ��> co nm rN*toOX ..Sm Z Acri• D > rnD -1ymA r-n> ---•I x D Or oor41 -0o IBC �8°-o ;c T DDo rm �1C1t ?C� Sm CI Zm Q y0Z• z; vAx, mr�' gut z°0 �1n O o¢az MIN. d� O> r'tW0 OW ryx n;N gS Z7nCm m - °N 1 a v--I w w� "�i,5, ar WOO Pir Z ■V►••VI z� -.„ EZ+t yt5m �_ mm vm ym 0 Akss, mz m^; C CNA I-Fri -Z zA_- 00 --1 �`��`���/ A 0 W pi .> #.y.�.:r. RI 0 C m m ; -010 o D v, ? -=:1�:i W > >; Z 0 �o • • �,�;�;`I 24" MIN. •"t W Z-1 o rri ° z> 4 Air Z'II,I,II Z N t ow v°, > a-� zE III �� z �2 ° > z$� ;z N o m 73 O x r5W 2 M O�UI Zp rn W D. U) A Z O�r�D D- 0 ° 73 X r r r b Zm0 2 R r O ni pi to 0 v N '6 oF 0 0 .v Qt ' O.°NI Lei1^, m m 0 D'TITLE: DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR MAUCH, PN 821-233-001 1 i'�_- S7- A.1 z F m *yy 4'F`1,* DETAILS & EROSION CONTROL NOTES VI N rt�co(� , tin, (A Co _o '~FFR�__t�y%,S0 N CLIENT:PACIFIC WEST MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION E NOV I C & PORT ANGELES, WA 9�2. VIEW ROAD ASSOCIATES PHONE:0; } Appendix B — Stormwater Calculations rilik�' JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .2x jogtStr. 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 360/379.4450.360/379-4451 Fax ht 1p:I lwww.co.jelferson.wa.us/oornmdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet I a -91 r h1 NT NAME: 1\nak .d , DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small: medium,'or large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stomRwater management permit application, building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stonnwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE f1.E..SITEI Size of parcel I • acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet SA,.Ll ci O sqf t / activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative)and/or the e6i isfing sod topography. Laid disturbing activities include, but are not limited to dealing, grading, filing, excavation.and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native a vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir.western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,saimonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower.and fireweed. �., o ',Al i;.-. .,F —�111L11 «o...:.►.1='L^:J!�. ,.. 111 / t Al :. 1 0a ...L 1.6/ i..! •/ t i7 Calculate the total area to be cleated,graded,fled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,andfar compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be deared for: of Does Construction site for stiuctuies D- 5C) native the project to lawn o51,r acres or more e sglR native hrsgetation to hwn tx handsdipsd areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. sq It Circle: Yes 4, Wei.utilities,etc. KM Does the project convert 234 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? / Driveway,parking,roads,etc. I a.30 KIM (NS)l Circle: Yes Lawn,landscaping.etc. I DOQ KIM Other compacted surface.etc. srtlf Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 50 qC) sgllt Cut FIN (couyd) tai wowwisr oat waaheat-REV.2201200S 1 Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the lbw present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas,concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS—IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING 0 Structures(all roof area) -� KIM Structures(all roof area) 0 sqm Sidewalks I&0 sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios 1 d sq/ft Patios /0,, sq/ft Solid Decks () sq/ft Solid Decks lJ sq/R (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc I D- CD sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads,etc 'n sq/ft Other C sq/ft Other 0 sq/ft Total New ,L9 P"e 0 sgfft Total Existing 17,D sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* L/ 'g� ;gift 'This amount Will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total string impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: C % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes b FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention--an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stonnwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP)Best Management Practices(BMPs) Packet Proponents of"medium"projects--those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for 'large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stonnwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stomhrvater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stonnwater Management Manual. APPUCANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stonnwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. eF ( •• ❑- AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) slonnatbr aft wakMNN-REV.a 02008 2 FIGURE 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT Start Here Does the site have Yes See Redevelopment 35%or more of Minimum existing impervious Requirements and coverage? Flow Chart (Figure 2) No Does the project convert 3/4 acres or more of native • vegetation to lawn or Does the project add No landscaped areas,or 5,000 square feet or convert 2.5 acres or more more of new of native vegetation to impervious surfaces? pasture? Yes Yes No Does the project have 2,000 square feet or "LARGE"PROJECT more of new,replaced, All Minimum Requirements or new plus replaced apply to the new impervious impervious surfaces? surfaces and converted pervious surfaces. Yes No • "MEDIUM"PROJECT • Does the project have Minimum Requirements#1 land-disturbing through#5 apply to the new Yes activities of 7,000 and replaced impervious square feet or more? surfaces and the land disturbed. No "SMALL"PROJECT See Minimum Requirement#2, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Based on Fig.2.2 from 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington II WWHM4 PROJECT REPORT FOR NEW INFILTRATION TRENCH AT 301 SHORE DRIVE. Project Name: 12058 TRENCH Site Name: MAUCH RESIDENCE Site Address: 301 SHORE DR. City: PORT LUDLOW Report Date: 4/3/2012 Gage: Port Angeles Data Start: 1948/10/01 Data End: 1993/09/30 Precip Scale: 0.80 Version: 2011/01/14 SUMMARY The following report was prepared to size an infiltration trench that will provide stormwater flow attenuation for a new residence for Mike and Mara Mauch at 301 Shore Dr. Port Ludlow,WA PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name: PRE HOUSE Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use Acres A B, Forest, Mod .072 Impervious Land Use Acres N/A MITIGATED LAND USE Name: NEW RESIDENCE Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Us a Acres Impervious Land Use Acres ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.072 INFILTRATION TRENCH ELEMENT Name: Infilt Trench 1 Bottom Length: 30.00 ft. Bottom Width: 6.00 ft. M. Trench bottom slope 1: 0 To 1 '0) M.24 Trench Left side slope 0: 0 To 1 4 "An L Trench right side slope 2: 0 To 1 W 4.s." . - x • Material thickness of first layer: 2 Pour Space of material for first layer: 0.4 Material thickness of second layer: 0 , 94s,0 STEQL Pour Space of material for second layer:0 0 • Material thickness of third layer: 0 Pour Space of material for third layer: 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate: 2 Infiltration saftey factor: 1 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2 ft. Riser Diameter: 10 in. ANALYSIS RESULTS Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC#1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.000011 5 year 0.000014 10 year 0.000015 25 year 0.000017 50 year 0.000017 100 year 0.000018 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC#1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0 5 year 0 10 year 0 25 year 0 50 year 0 100 year 0 POC#1 The Facility PASSED Perind and Impind Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying documentation is provided'as-is'without warranty of any kind.The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user.Clear Creek Solutions,Inc.disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied,including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions,Inc.be liable for any damages whatsoever(including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits,loss of business information,business interruption,and the like)arising out of the use of,or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions,Inc.has been advised of the possibility of such damages. N S rill en N r 5® lL gl d ® ® is _ L.. I - 'MIMI LEM I i ,,,_ pj 0 1111 FiElliE " " 0 j ;i . - - 7 i IM ,Z2 in I 1 i I ! Li [9.1 a g gg 2 2 .C. 2 a. a. n 3 gg ,11 x po O 2S g # � � � � � �S g n % O O n � x T 0 2 » 3 < < < 2 3 m 2 .. 3 �' g ' Z ti-41 u , i 3 0 • WE 4I ' t Q � IL, O e 4 r -i o ) - D IH 3� ♦/ ll m a I' Cr. a) i 2 S Q 'n ,T "-- � -. 0 Q 0 m m o I •. n a ri 4: O to ^, r - 8 pry p k 11 „Ed: 1 IV N ± 11. i‘ 1 21 al 4 2 s I �g IP in 0 iii m 1 f? ro 1 1 3 c, p c s m w x Appendix C — Construction and Site Remediation BMPs . BMP C107: Construction Road/Parking Area Stabilization Purpose Stabilizing subdivision roads,parking areas, and other onsite vehicle transportation routes immediately after grading reduces erosion caused by construction traffic or runoff. Conditions of Use • Roads or parking areas shall be stabilized wherever they are constructed, whether permanent or temporary,for use by construction traffic. • Fencing(see BMPs C103 and C104) shall be installed, if necessary, to limit the access of vehicles to only those roads and parking areas that are stabilized. Design and • On areas that will receive asphalt as part of the project, install the first Installation lift as soon as possible. Specifications • A 6-inch depth of 2- to 4-inch crushed rock, gravel base, or crushed surfacing base course shall be applied immediately after grading or utility installation. A 4-inch course of asphalt treated base(ATB)may also be used, or the road/parking area may be paved. It may also be possible to use cement or calcium chloride for soil stabilization. If cement or cement kiln dust is used for roadbase stabilization,pH monitoring and BMPs are necessary to evaluate and minimize the effects on sormwater. If the area will not be used for permanent roads, parking areas, or structures, a 6-inch depth of hog fuel may also be used,but this is likely to require more maintenance. Whenever possible, construction roads and parking areas shall be placed on a firm, compacted subgrade. • Temporary road gradients shall not exceed 15 percent. Roadways shall be carefully graded to drain. Drainage ditches shall be provided on each side of the roadway in the case of a crowned section,or on one side in the case of a super-elevated section. Drainage ditches shall be directed to a sediment control BMP. • Rather than relying on ditches, it may also be possible to grade the road so that runoff sheet-flows into a heavily vegetated area with a well- developed topsoil. Landscaped areas are not adequate. If this area has at least 50 feet of vegetation,then it is generally preferable to use the vegetation to treat runoff,rather than a sediment pond or trap. The 50 feet shall not include wetlands. If runoff is allowed to sheetflow through adjacent vegetated areas,it is vital to design the roadways and parking areas so that no concentrated runoff is created. • Storm drain inlets shall be protected to prevent sediment-laden water entering the storm drain system(see BMP C220). Maintenance • Inspect stabilized areas regularly,especially after large storm events. Standards • Crushed rock,gravel base,hog fuel,etc. shall be added as required to maintain a stable driving surface and to stabilize any areas that have eroded. • Following construction,these areas shall be restored to pre-construction condition or better to prevent future erosion. 4-12 Volume 11—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 . BMP C120: Temporary and Permanent Seeding Purpose Seeding is intended to reduce erosion by stabilizing exposed soils. A well-established vegetative cover is one of the most effective methods of reducing erosion. Conditions of Use • Seeding may be used throughout the project on disturbed areas that have reached final grade or that will remain unworked for more than 30 days. • Channels that will be vegetated should be installed before major earthwork and hydroseeded with a Bonded Fiber Matrix. The vegetation should be well established (i.e., 75 percent cover)before water is allowed to flow in the ditch. With channels that will have high flows, erosion control blankets should be installed over the hydroseed. If vegetation cannot be established from seed before water is allowed in the ditch, sod should be installed in the bottom of the ditch over hydromulch and blankets. • Retention/detention ponds should be seeded as required. • Mulch is required at all times because it protects seeds from heat, moisture loss, and transport due to runoff. • All disturbed areas shall be reviewed in late August to early September and all seeding should be completed by the end of September. Otherwise,vegetation will not establish itself enough to provide more than average protection. • At final site stabilization, all disturbed areas not otherwise vegetated or stabilized shall be seeded and mulched. Final stabilization means the completion of all soil disturbing activities at the site and the establishment of a permanent vegetative cover, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as pavement, riprap, gabions or geotextiles)which will prevent erosion. Design and • Seeding should be done during those seasons most conducive to Installation growth and will vary with the climate conditions of the region. Specifications Local experience should be used to determine the appropriate seeding periods. • The optimum seeding windows for western Washington are April 1 through June 30 and September 1 through October 1. Seeding that occurs between July 1 and August 30 will require irrigation until 75 percent grass cover is established. Seeding that occurs between October 1 and March 30 will require a mulch or plastic cover until 75 percent grass cover is established. • To prevent seed from being washed away, confirm that all required surface water control measures have been installed. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-13 • The seedbed should be firm and rough. All soil should be roughened no matter what the slope. If compaction is required for engineering purposes, slopes must be track walked before seeding. Backblading or smoothing of slopes greater than 4:1 is not allowed if they are to be seeded. • New and more effective restoration-based landscape practices rely on deeper incorporation than that provided by a simple single-pass rototilling treatment. Wherever practical the subgrade should be initially ripped to improve long-term permeability, infiltration, and water inflow qualities. At a minimum,permanent areas shall use soil amendments to achieve organic matter and permeability performance defined in engineered soil/landscape systems. For systems that are deeper than 8 inches the rototilling process should be done in multiple lifts,or the prepared soil system shall be prepared properly and then placed to achieve the specified depth. • Organic matter is the most appropriate form of"fertilizer"because it provides nutrients(including nitrogen,phosphorus, and potassium)in the least water-soluble form. A natural system typically releases 2-10 percent of its nutrients annually. Chemical fertilizers have since been formulated to simulate what organic matter does naturally. • In general, 10-4-6 N-P-K(nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium) fertilizer can be used at a rate of 90 pounds per acre. Slow-release fertilizers should always be used because they are more efficient and have fewer environmental impacts. It is recommended that areas being seeded for final landscaping conduct soil tests to determine the exact type and quantity of fertilizer needed. This will prevent the over-application of fertilizer. Fertilizer should not be added to the hydromulch machine and agitated more than 20 minutes before it is to be used. If agitated too much,the slow-release coating is destroyed. • There are numerous products available on the market that take the place of chemical fertilizers. These include several with seaweed extracts that are beneficial to soil microbes and organisms. If 100 percent cottonseed meal is used as the mulch in hydroseed, chemical fertilizer may not be necessary. Cottonseed meal is a good source of long-term, slow-release, available nitrogen. • Hydroseed applications shall include a minimum of 1,500 pounds per acre of mulch with 3 percent tackifier. Mulch may be made up of 100 percent: cottonseed meal; fibers made of wood,recycled cellulose, hemp, and kenaf; compost; or blends of these. Tackifier shall be plant- based, such as guar or alpha plantago,or chemical-based such as polyacrylamide or polymers. Any mulch or tackifier product used shall be installed per manufacturer's instructions. Generally,mulches come in 40-50 pound bags. Seed and fertilizer are added at time of application. 4-14 Volume 11—Construction Stonnwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 • Mulch is always required for seeding. Mulch can be applied on top of the seed or simultaneously by hydroseeding. • On steep slopes,Bonded Fiber Matrix(BFM) or Mechanically Bonded Fiber Matrix (MBFM)products should be used. BFM/MBFM products are applied at a minimum rate of 3,000 pounds per acre of mulch with approximately 10 percent tackifier. Application is made so that a minimum of 95 percent soil coverage is achieved. Numerous products are available commercially and should be installed per manufacturer's instructions. Most products require 24-36 hours to cure before a rainfall and cannot be installed on wet or saturated soils. Generally, these products come in 40-50 pound bags and include all necessary ingredients except for seed and fertilizer. BFMs and MBFMs have some advantages over blankets: • No surface preparation required; • Can be installed via helicopter in remote areas; • On slopes steeper than 2.5:1,blanket installers may need to be roped and harnessed for safety; • They are at least$1,000 per acre cheaper installed. In most cases, the shear strength of blankets is not a factor when used on slopes, only when used in channels. BFMs and MBFMs are good alternatives to blankets in most situations where vegetation establishment is the goal. • When installing seed via hydroseeding operations, only about 1/3 of the seed actually ends up in contact with the soil surface. This reduces the ability to establish a good stand of grass quickly. One way to overcome this is to increase seed quantities by up to 50 percent. • Vegetation establishment can also be enhanced by dividing the hydromulch operation into two phases: 1. Phase 1- Install all seed and fertilizer with 25-30 percent mulch and tackifier onto soil in the first lift; 2. Phase 2-Install the rest of the mulch and tackifier over the first lift. An alternative is to install the mulch, seed, fertilizer, and tackifier in one lift. Then, spread or blow straw over the top of the hydromulch at a rate of about 800-1000 pounds per acre. Hold straw in place with a standard tackifier. Both of these approaches will increase cost moderately but will greatly improve and enhance vegetative establishment. The increased cost may be offset by the reduced need for: 1. Irrigation 2. Reapplication of mulch 3. Repair of failed slope surfaces February 2005 Volume 11—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-15 This technique works with standard hydromulch(1,500 pounds per acre minimum) and BFM/MBFMs(3,000 pounds per acre minimum). • Areas to be permanently landscaped shall provide a healthy topsoil that reduces the need for fertilizers,improves overall topsoil quality, provides for better vegetal health and vitality, improves hydrologic characteristics, and reduces the need for irrigation. This can be accomplished in a number of ways: Recent research has shown that the best method to improve till soils is to amend these soils with compost. The optimum mixture is approximately two parts soil to one part compost. This equates to 4 inches of compost mixed to a depth of 12 inches in till soils. Increasing the concentration of compost beyond this level can have negative effects on vegetal health,while decreasing the concentrations can reduce the benefits of amended soils. Please note: The compost should meet specifications for Grade A quality compost in Ecology Publication 94-038. Other soils, such as gravel or cobble outwash soils,may require different approaches. Organics and fines easily migrate through the loose structure of these soils. Therefore, the importation of at least 6 inches of quality topsoil,underlain by some type of filter fabric to prevent the migration of fines,may be more appropriate for these soils. Areas that already have good topsoil, such as undisturbed areas,do not require soil amendments. • Areas that will be seeded only and not landscaped may need compost or meal-based mulch included in the hydroseed in order to establish vegetation. Native topsoil should be re-installed on the disturbed soil surface before application. • Seed that is installed as a temporary measure may be installed by hand if it will be covered by straw,mulch,or topsoil. Seed that is installed as a permanent measure may be installed by hand on small areas (usually less than 1 acre)that will be covered with mulch, topsoil, or erosion blankets. The seed mixes listed below include recommended mixes for both temporary and permanent seeding. These mixes,with the exception of the wetland mix, shall be applied at a rate of 120 pounds per acre. This rate can be reduced if soil amendments or slow- release fertilizers are used. Local suppliers or the local conservation district should be consulted for their recommendations because the appropriate mix depends on a variety of factors, including location, exposure, soil type, slope, and expected foot traffic. Alternative seed mixes approved by the local authority may be used. 4-16 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 Table 4.1 represents the standard mix for those areas where just a temporary vegetative cover is required. Table 4.1 Temporary Erosion Control Seed Mix %Weight %Purity %Germination Chewings or annual blue grass 40 98 90 Festuca rubra var.commutata or Poa anna Perennial rye- 50 98 90 Lolium perenne Redtop or colonial bentgrass 5 92 85 Agrostis alba or Agrostis tenuis White dutch clover 5 98 90 Trifolium repens Table 4.2 provides just one recommended possibility for landscaping seed. Table 4.2 Landscaping Seed Mix Weight %Purity %Germination Perennial rye blend 70 98 90 Lolium perenne Chewings and red fescue blend 30 98 90 Festuca rubra var. commutata or Festuca rubra This turf seed mix in Table 4.3 is for dry situations where there is no need for much water. The advantage is that this mix requires very little maintenance. Table 4.3 Low-Growing Turf Seed Mix % Weight %Purity %Germination Dwarf tall fescue(several varieties) 45 98 90 Festuca arundinacea var. Dwarf perennial rye(Barclay) 30 98 90 Lolium perenne var.barclay Red fescue 20 98 90 Festuca rubra Colonial bentgrass 5 98 90 Agrostis tenuis Table 4.4 presents a mix recommended for bioswales and other intermittently wet areas. Table 4.4 Bioswale Seed Mix* %Weight %Purity %Germination Tall or meadow fescue 75-80 98 90 Festuca arundinacea or Festuca elatior Seaside/Creeping bentgrass 10-15 92 85 Agrostis palustris Redtop bentgrass 5-10 90 80 Agrostis alba or Agrostis gigantea *Modified Briargreen,Inc.Hydroseeding Guide Wetlands Seed Mix February 2005 Volume 11—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-17 The seed mix shown in Table 4.5 is a recommended low-growing, relatively non-invasive seed mix appropriate for very wet areas that are not regulated wetlands. Other mixes may be appropriate, depending on the soil type and hydrology of the area. Recent research suggests that bentgrass(agrostis sp.)should be emphasized in wet-area seed mixes. Apply this mixture at a rate of 60 pounds per acre. Table 4.5 Wet Area Seed Mix* %Weight %Purity %Germination Tall or meadow fescue 60-70 98 90 Festuca arundinacea or • Festuca elatior Seaside/Creeping bentgrass 10-15 98 85 Agrostis palustris Meadow foxtail 10-15 90 80 Alepocurus pratensis Alsike clover 1-6 98 90 Trifolium hybridum Redtop bentgrass 1-6 92 85 Agrostis alba *Modified Briargreen,Inc.Hydroseeding Guide Wetlands Seed Mix The meadow seed mix in Table 4.6 is recommended for areas that will be maintained infrequently or not at all and where colonization by native plants is desirable. Likely applications include rural road and utility right- of-way. Seeding should take place in September or very early October in order to obtain adequate establishment prior to the winter months. The appropriateness of clover in the mix may need to be considered, as this can be a fairly invasive species. If the soil is amended,the addition of clover may not be necessary. Table 4.6 Meadow Seed Mix %Weight %Purity %Germination Redtop or Oregon bentgrass 20 92 85 Agrostis alba or Agrostis oregonensis Red fescue 70 98 90 Festuca rubra White dutch clover 10 98 90 Trifolium repens Maintenance • Any seeded areas that fail to establish at least 80 percent cover(100 Standards percent cover for areas that receive sheet or concentrated flows) shall be reseeded. If reseeding is ineffective, an alternate method, such as sodding,mulching, or nets/blankets, shall be used. If winter weather prevents adequate grass growth,this time limit may be relaxed at the discretion of the local authority when sensitive areas would otherwise be protected. 4-18 Volume 11-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 • After adequate cover is achieved,any areas that experience erosion shall be reseeded and protected by mulch. If the erosion problem is drainage related,the problem shall be fixed and the eroded area reseeded and protected by mulch. • Seeded areas shall be supplied with adequate moisture,but not watered to the extent that it causes runoff. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-19 Appendix D — Geotechnical Report a - I X * -1D 0) CO -1 -b x -1 -1 CD 0) -- -- a) -D Cl) 0) x O. C7 r+ x 0) C) -5 -0 0) 0 - "0 -5 -5 0 0) < 0. CD 0) 0 CD 3 X CC -- CD CC CD CD a CD r+ O CD - 0 7c C -S E -5 -- CD C7 0 0 # CC C0 - r\ CD CD cn -s W -I 0_ 0 0 0 CO - CO 0 CO 0 3 CO O a N C C7 N CA) CA) CA0 CJ1 0 0 O C CO O O H- - 0) Z 3 CI • . r+ a r Cl) GI O �l a O '0 C C O N CD 73 01 S X 0) 0) C7 -1 W 0 -1 03 a -C7 CO S 1- r CD --1 -1 C3 73 a Z I-I rn x N O. m C-) Z L -1 X a) v a v 3 m a CO N r o c-D a -1 70 - m a) a c n a a 0 - ro v rn H cD o � x 0 rn - z) -- O -I S o a I-I - N O 73 r- 73 07 CA) M H rn r- 0) rn D z CO P1 o 73 r? CD CO CO -I ,.1 -I N -C -s no rn = 0) -- N 70 I-1 O 3 CD Z Ti o_ I o cD r- cn o -A O -� 0) -H E a c 0 m CD O_ 77 01 C7 o C o_ CO CD CD CO 0 o -1 -I C) - v I- CI 0 z v a C7 CD c3 C 3 S 0-3 a C jv z v O P-1 -I c v c) 0 ------ 0) r+ O_ 77 3 0_ I 7 0 0 a - CO - 0_ o z L. -• w - CD -I, v a ti .. .. 0 0 L - O I-1 o -n z 0 na T .o O c Fi 7D IL . I I • ` , • • ' . 0 .1 i , I . a �" i 2 0 . .. I • • .'AYH 9 - \ • • • • • 111000,4 "1... • .• Agar. ' . • . '� � ;iE � � •MEM 1 ow' . . 1 d 4 . . 144 Ig.t. -46!""7:51"."Y"''"". +46'^--S' '.".'.- MM � LV 47 �G ' =-� } • •. 4X 1 O Pr.112.TYP HDR ONO .• . . ^ n • • 0 • .61-....-- r',� A C L' `D • IGaat"Ar. • Pea PLAAJ F St#Hi i kill•If APflJGAC1 _._ = 004E NFvuNti SOLID $P�d'1 �, LEI-AIL 1-ht -. eI & . r °• I J 1 El . , at • "On 111111PIP IF f ,t ('k'A twosevoactOmno int • ,-7 , 1"liniawilwal. 111111t) t.4. ��✓Fr .. v-' I moo' . ) . 'D t r O �r, 0 % ' ' I rli H i 111;. r; • ____11 so. . 'Pn'''.:;12! , ii 18.114* , .. g 8o • ti R' o� I I a � ` I Si\ 1 I 1 1% rUM *1 m IN ", . i. I 1 03 lien 1 � p y III . �S '4 !IMO O aal ti ; .w.....w.....0.0,04, ` el . 6 •,`+:I , • 2 . I It r-,.. ,-.... I *ill I Lj . lliuumwor% I, I . ww • 4 _ . m ' � ' 1 Ig-gii: . 1 ,, ,rg 1 . 1 . g 2 a. i a 1,9. -8 I 1. L . Imowesex §' • 2.----) ci E I . I l 1 it Y Farr t ?fir. marsh r it ating:&desig r • I k. .,.. ., r r • r MA :A 4 NUKE MAUCH . 00C) I-4 .0 N M.4.1,4t-i 7.M ,,,,,,, 1....ti -01/..-0C. -- ._._,-------5 ---ri---63-17-1--"=...--- ,0 1 tSTAk., vi ipitS -----------_,_47---------7- — <11) (VIA 1.14 5l )101 alli:S , . rNBS .. 9,1 _ ---- -- --,. 4+ y-----------_,,Qs „.„------„, L'12.1._6, • /Jo /OrgriLvod Mrd10/. c11/ 1v D '(vrri X.511 - gs f • - °c,,, . ee 119/11(ki GT VW f ilii-1* • --- • I:44(14 15 1 i I I 1 /Oh ":- 01 : frirs -)v.v.i.„ -,LidrAS 6.011 sril A., BL—\-C-- — —1 ----,, V4 tod ...a i js ,,, _ 1 , , 1,1 ' r- -- . 1 ri" 5 ir- V ch L252, '116. , - ,., • IN " ?, , /06ticerii /$i •"/ tVICW"d . ,,,,---- /cf) ar (..1 ( 5.3 g ,Bn f2,„ „- loz-Ads. ! cit ii, 159 • *1 v - a )171149, A tl) 114e- 0 Ell LL-: 8 T . , •Acery coddli; 'd eivd V, ,,scsud"d I - -- 714 a ' I . i = r (i11-0 I .- of)/01 ' tovivvi Lii-i,1-4 ,AtAlg 9 (01)0) - 0 1/4,4 11.11040 14 1 ,-,) I \/) . - I ol,- 1 , ,----- 1 Noo . I ' 0) 2 /551 • - fl 1 3 qg Qt.., 110f/ 1 i P CP 2 ----------- 1 (9, 6 _I 6 Lico-to,las s ,cinto Gvlritcrog L'vtliekl 1., 40 0,00_KO i cr4v olnelddbl *-1 Nie ,t,) .f-zg ._, ,001 & ASSOCIATES 301 East 6th Street,Suite i INCORPORATED Port Angeles,Washington 98362 (360)417-0501 Fax(360)417-0514 E-mail:zenovic@olympus.net May 20, 2009 Franz and Janice Gruber 102 East Fir Street Port Ludlow, WA 98365-8773 Re: Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow Par. No. 821-233-001 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gruber Zenovic&Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the west side of Hood Canal, east of Port Ludlow, Jefferson County. The property is situated along the shoreline of Hood Canal at the east end of East Fir Street. Access to the site is from East Fir Street, off of Paradise Bay Road, approximately two miles north of Highway 104 at the west end of the Hood Canal Bridge. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. A portion of the site is mapped as an Unstable— Recent Slide slope on the Jefferson County Shoreline Map. Slopes designated as recent slides are based on evaluations completed in the 1970s. Subsequent sliding has not been documented by the State and is subject to our review and conclusions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will riot induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code(JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website(1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington(USDA/SCS, August, 1975),the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, and Jefferson County Unified Development Code. Page 2 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, a significant area comp_r out _Aidempod-Sinclair_soihssociationextends-soLthani_east#rom Discovery Bay to the Admiralty Inlet/Hood Canal shoreline, encompassing the majority of the easterly portion of Jefferson County, including the Dabob and Coyle peninsulas. The subject site is located in the easterly portion of the mapped soil association. The Alderwood-Sinclair soils are typically moderately well-drained, dominantly strongly sloping to steep, gravelly soils underlain by glacial till. Inspection of the soil maps of the site indicate that the property has within an area of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, that extends throughout the developed area along Paradise Bay Road. The Alderwood soils are derived from weathered glacial till. These soils were deposited by the ice sheet during the Vashon stade glaciation. The Vashon Glacial 1111 consists of a poorly sorted mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashon-age ice sheet. Finer portions of the soil consist of clay, silt, and sand. These fine particles comprise a moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components (gravel, cobbles, and boulders)are firmly imbedded. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic&Associates, Inc. conducted a site visit on April 21, 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immediate subsurface hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. Existing Slopes The property has a gently sloping upland area, with a gradient of approximately 2 to 3 percent downhill from west to east, terminating at a near vertical marine bluff of approximately 50 feet in height. The toe of the bluff is situated on the shoreline of Hood Canal. The bluff has a relatively consistent slope with a gradient of in excess of 150%. The upper portion of the bluff is a near vertical formation while the lower portion is less steep. The material creating the less steep slope at the base of he bluff is the colluvial material that has eroded from the bluff face due to wind erosion and the natural freeze- thaw cycle that loosens the bluff soils. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently Alderwood soli types as shown on the Soil Survey maps. Inspection of the bluff face indicates that the depth of the surficial gravelly sand loam is typically deeper than is typical for the Alderwood soils, extending to depths of up to 60 inches. These more gravelly soils are less stable than the underlying compact glacial till, so some sloughing of the upper area of the bluff face is anticipated. Page 3 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 Vegetation Site v etation_consists_o well maintained Jawn-throughout-the majority of-the site. A small area of the native coniferous forest with a dense understory of brush covers the westerly third of the property. Two large fir trees(48°diameter)are located approximately 20 feet from the top of the bluff. Hydrology and Drainage The upland area of the site is basically flat as is the tributary area to the west. No bankdrainageways. were observed on the upland area of the property or on the face of the International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand, silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for structures within 75 feet of the top of the bank. CONCLUSIONS The bank is shown to be unstable—recent slides in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. This determination is based on review of available aerial photography in the 1970's and does not reflect the current situation. However, the face of the bluff does show some minor weakness, so a setback for development is appropriate. The standard bluff setback of one foot for each foot of height is reasonable to provide adequate protection of any structures. This setback will be approximately 50 feet for the site; decks and similar appurtenances may extend into the setback area consistent with Section 18.25.4100)of the Uniform Development Code. RECOMMENDATIONS General The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Page 4 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be canted to firm, substantial,--unyielding-subsoil,etz-depth-ofnot-less man inches feet below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 75 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. Slope Maintenance Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System The septic tank and pump chamber for the existing on-site sewage disposal system are located approximately 25 feet from the top of the bank. These tanks and associated piping may remain in place. The area around these two tanks should be inspected on a regular basis to make sure that no leakage is occurring. Visual inspection of the lawn area around the tanks for unusual growth will be adequate. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a steep bank on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein Is the property of the Grubers and may not be used without their permission. The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. Page 5 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely_, Ze vic&Associates, Inc. phen M. Zenovic, P.E. ncipal Engineer Enclosures Fc: JN 09073 I�� Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number:821233001 05/14/2007 Owner Mete Address: FRANZ GRUBER JANICE J GR EER 102E FIR ST PORT LUDLOW WA 983658773 Site Address: 1 Section: 23 School District: Chimacum(49) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Part Ludlow(3) Township: 28N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Paradise Bay(8) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND QCD 5/28/02 94718 Property Description: S23 T28 R1E I LOT 1 (S100') I I I No Photo AvalIabe http://www.co jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NC*821233001... 5/21/2009 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 ' otoariessolom sesioloi to o3 e < , , -0001 ; 13101021w I 1016.' `-1 { 1 t .+`. .w,04,- ,, ` �, 1111 3 4 6 3 7;1 q 'Fj S""t N. ''3 t..' `i`°0°�"• K ` :'a u a�. w, r_ i� i r3. .e44hSi„m-J k C _ •iDi!�W/'W e �" yS k 1- 141111t4.' •••.•. ...0,444,7,r' is,4r••f , •,'-�"�•ass-rr.�ac ` 4- •-=''-7; ' 3'V.-t� t.. -_ ..tr 1111111001104. ,w,.; �'-' �F 4}y 6e.w -r +a < w - pass.„ ti." ...:;,�-I. .rwa- 8 3' -4 - . :•._ - * y ?; 5 .`. i6E3MO31 < t, 1. Q ,, , < , 112 : .1303 11� ", r.1 �- .i 'It RfR.•{ 1S3 0021O" T4 oFn- 6034002fl1'N3100°` '•ft, /77 , - - • . r 6 i t 1271 , `. 4 F a' - . ' 1271,, a r ,- �,. a . 641271000 ! -44a f 2710,J ' J ,4 Pe katisitnCorara�naesagg = 1,.,,oc0eTtb 3 M AP Az ?MOTs o http://maps.00 jeffersoa.waus/Website/mspub/MapFrameltm 4/14/2009 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 „ • 98340352A I 993403523\,-., 1 983400520' I 1--------1 i'l 11113A/_5,927e0;400s24983400.524 1010400422 I ! 980400519 988400519 I ( /I • 1, ' Cl' ee3.1500, 9---71-9834°°623403512 I 1 i Al L itiss41040z00517 1 i 1( 91134014( .„ 91111400506 903400510 I $!34°G613 / • ''' 913400509 OW400511 ,li "343°514 --11 I j i ,, -P--• -. -.. 1-- ----------"t I 1 ef /. _, ,---Efriegniockst IIIIIrddir \ illi3400407 \ i I 983401406 1 / r----:fv----4--21 i e , 933400413 i it118340140? i .; 1 9183400402 1 , 083403406, 1.983400408 I num+1 9834004' ,-,„ i 983400404 ____ - - ---- -- - -- ----------- - --,--_,--,, II N, 911341°°4°1 ,1634a°424 9434°3421 if 983.1,42°I 9a34°°419 I 9834(K)417 1 9134°°41 16-I Plik----734::::4387) iiiiiii:/ 11 \ 1 9834 --4—"0-4—T—, NYc; r-• —'''.,. ! i 83 ,\4.00,116 / =m : / I 1)A tra40Oi06 1383400101r \ 983403107.. 1 .. Nsi , . 1. I ! 1 N3401412 ' II \ / / If 81134032037 910400m3 1 1 \ 1 983400108 t 983003109 I 983400113 983400/14 I ' 1-, 11/ V ------ / 6: --I I - ......_______L__I --.).:, 983400108 983400112, i ,-----.. i ---,--- , i. .s. ■ ,) 1 s., --7 1 983401413 0,34*!aaa• I 983400102 1 ' N"--‘,.... I ; . I '''' , \<1/4 ----, i 1 1 s_.,...• 98340011e :N.,...- —8934CKFII7 I 98343011- '- t....„,, \\. .-,„..-2 /1(1 8340020t I ' goucknot 1 c,, ! i ..,) '.....„) i , N / kl) \ f..^)s821123300: 1 ) it . \ ( 11 . I\ W-F,11'15 z 1 E Fir St .\...., ,,,,,,-4 82120= .....„,\ , I ill I I 1 821271014 821271014 I 62127104, I' I/ q ' ' I al \ ir'' k\.,.., ill / / 1 ! , 1 1 821282003 ) 1 i t, 1 , \ t i k 1 \ ‘ 1 \ i 7.7''.\ ) ,,,i,, ---4\ ' -wiartooe.'l , ( I\ ) s I \ 821271017 1 ( ' 1 ) / 1 821262011 1 ‘, ci I 6, / 02127: 1.0111/',..ljt r° )4.), f ( \ ii 01-1.4. etworrieledtrldranrartesztrealrad SarviaterGe )1212:110? / i Ct.e-'Tote&12.Aii th(_ t41 its? oo,,eroet. tv.rt%%mitt a )0' • http://maps.cojeffirson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrame.htm 5/21/2009 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 5se3�ooeoese�.oa�1e °aeooti, �.°_.�"",,.-. p63000723DB810D7D101�10 ;y;,. ;:44300403 9481O071T 4d31007ti.a.? a -. i1 9431404f0 ,' 9431007 443i0OSi41 - _ ro43140i13T T-. �sa1444os . _ rte_ - - to :k .„,,„.-,..4-r- Y 031 ..�, o — _ • - x ww *-� _. ,. , J`�ea�o4I .40604, 9144663M0D144 1a : _ 99140( '.„ 1=` 049100th 9431014099 I 1051101111 - 00410011.1 903401112' 93 tool '� '? a 049100117 : 105 41948100113 043401113, 18 -903400101 949100113 421271014 1122271015 �. 1921471014 - F 121271004 � .�` - �� w� " " 321262003 ' fi■ J z I 1' 1 1:12126209 _1271017- 41,` v-41262012' ;� _12127042 ,--,,,:y x��" � s 7 rte ,- * --,,,-,27;::;, - .F$+.2t27i014 s k 1"'.,12121400 421271010 \t'4' F t �� 121242006 i1¢ '-- „-2-°°"t 20+0: ..- 1t1271O10. ti t�w i MEnQ lafdeA6 M SrMu.rrj SLO9 5 two„,m,..t trP http://maps.co je ersoawaus JWebsite/mspub/MapFrame.htm 5/21/2009 ' ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 111 , 883407207_9$340l203� '9834011001 983.0111)5_,,*'983401301 rf !)21401209 983+101202 903401102 1 903401108 N, i., j----- i r--1 933/01109 14 3901304 4, ', ,r 3401210 963401$) 1111, I 803401107 '183401304''; ,■,; i 883400404 33401:61,3.°--\711\1, _04000006re., I 003/01004 I 961001008 1 . '. 96:401006. j063401010 969 8814010031 ' I 1 963901012. 663400909: 963400602.983401001 963401019 969401013 1, .1 963/00910 1 j $83401021 I 11 963401019---- .---� ti 9831010201 ! 964401014_, 56340130$' c ,,,:,#461""11! `_"'—E911dder$ '803401313 1 963400004 981000716 9/3400721 ' v663401310"`•,,,, 18"°795 -' -'__1 `' 0717 1 1963400716 8d94007Ct1 r '86340.1001.• -98$49070? i9e3■oaeo9 943400eo2 I 1 11 li T--r s ' ""400811 0001 4004..14 90310017±�10-_-��� �iii X963401401 • X900706—{—i �"^ 963/01403 . 063400607; poem,Q 71 I 17-983400619 1I� ""904040e06a I i i---I--� 1_.J. _ 9e3400621 9R140051a 909401406 \' 683400601 663400504 963400607 ,___ 0444000.03-- 44 00.00,3,..003400609. f I I 1314 963400617 �, �*�` - -_983400508,_ u—_9$3400616 p0_ Ekcih-St ' 68400119 1r > cialio,— E963401408 964000902 1>81340030Q 989400408 X883900411 963400413 1903404407 809000903; 903400910 I 963400414, t -"!' 9 / 981409Jis X01 2'� 963400418 963400416 1408 00801-_.983400311 � 963400417---7 I { 96!400420 9$390091$ 903901410 c -3t Crd St 983401471 800001003 ( 1 ) 983400204 9034001040010$ __1 i • 804001005 983400227 1 963400107 1 96.7400112 ' 834014 `' 4..i. .•893490208.-1963400203 983400106 1.963400108 X 963400114 4 9993400202 —~-803400104 881001001 4--„ II{---903100117 983400113 ! ;'983+1014.r`5 903400201 101 .1 96!400115 ...eviiiiminiv4.."/P4**'''WIMUMM°..,.,,- , Vii►St �? 821233001 Eck I $21262002 0212710,4 821271015 821271004 821271006 821271014 • . 1 i 821262003 021271008 I 821271017 I 821262011 821271002 _ 82127100$ 821271018''" 821262012 r^^ e f : 821271019 1121271024 £821271018 1 :' "----.--'--821282008 rtal Siervi,ceksGe,--.N 4 a rrI L Art_ A42.4.44's VA RP — 1.A Na spate A R b http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/WebsitehnvubfiviapFrame.htm 5/21/2009 • JEFFERSON COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON - SHEET NUI (Joins Ilan!) R.1 E. • } • 1 055 000 13 " , •Z T� LTV F "F • #Y (Joins&gaper kit) } R.1 E. 1 ens 000 FEET 5 t7L SOILS, i p � ICI 8 SOIL auaV Y 60 inches.The soil holds 10 or more inches of water available reddish brown(5YR 6/4)dry;massive;slightly acid;gradual, for plants. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion wavy (4 to 12 inches thick) is slight. A seasonal water table is at a depth of 1 to 2 feet. t bedrock. About 60 to 70 percent of the acreage is used for crops. Depth to basalt bedrock rages from 24 to 4o inches. The Bir Pasture,hay,and silage from mixed and legumes are horizons zis m re than 80 percent loam fror actured very veal basalt bedrock. . The C the principal crops. A variety of esvegetables, berries, horizon is more than so percent and tree fruits may be grown. Capability unit IIIw=1;wood- Included with this soil in mapping are rc ru ll areas of land group 8d2. . Rock outcrop and of Triton soils. Agnew silt loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes (AgE).— This soil is well drained. Permeability is moderate. Roots This soil is mainly along ocean bluffs or canyon sidewalk. penetrate to the bedrock. This soil holds 2 to 4 inches of The subsoil in many places contains strata of silty day ater available for plants. Runoff is very rapid, and the loam,fine sandy loam,silty clay, and sandy cla l y of--won- -severe.Runoff is rapid,and the hazard of water erosion is severe. This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife Most areas of this soil are wooded. When used for building habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit VIIe-1; wood- sites, the soil often slides when saturated. Capability unit land group 3d2. We-1;woodland group 3d2. Ahl-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent slopes (AkF).—This mapping unit is made up of about 50 to 70 Ahl Series outcrop aannd sstoonyararevas.The eAAhls oil its 24 to 30 inches deep The Ahl series consists of well-drained,very in most places. ci'3'gm�Y loam Almost all the acreage of the complex is used for tree soils underlain by basalt bedrock at a depth of 24 to 40 production and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. inches. These soils are on mountainous terrain. Slopes range Capability unit VIIs-1;woodland group 4x2. from 50 to 90 percent. Elevation ranges from 800 to about 3,000 feet. These soils formed in weathered basalt under a � , dominantly coniferous forest of Douglas-fir,western hemlock, and western redoedar.Annual precipitation is 60 to 80 inches. The Alderwood series consists of moderately well drained The average annual air temperature is about 49°F. The soils that have a very slowly permeable cemented layer at a above 32°F growing season ranges from 150 to 190 days, depth of 20 to 40 inches.Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 180 to 230 Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. These soils formed in days. These soils are associated mainly with Grove, Lystair, glacial till under a forest of mixed coniferous and broad- Olete,and Triton soils. leaved vegetation. Annual precipitation ranges from 25 to In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter 50 inches. The average annual air temperature is about covers the surface. The upper 8 inches of the soil is dark 49°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from 160 to reddish-brown very gravelly loam. Below this, to a depth of 260 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 30 inches,is very gravelly loam that is dark red in the upper 220 to 320 days. These soils are associated mainly with part and reddish brown in the lower part. Beneath this, and Beausite, Casey, Clallam,Dick, Everett, Hoypus, Indianola, extending to a depth of 38 inches, is mostly angular basalt Sinclair, and Whidbey soils. pebbles and fractured, weathered basalt. Basalt bedrock is In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter at a depth of 38 inches. covers the surface. The top 1 inch of the soil is very dark -Ahl soils are used mainly for tree production and for wild- grayish-brown gravelly fine sandy loam. Below this, to a /life habitat and recreation areas. depth of 12 inches, is dark yellowish-brown gravelly sandy __ Ahl very gravelly loam, 50 to 70 percent slopes loam. Beneath this layer, and continuing to a depth of 80 (AhF).—This very steep soil is in the mountains. inches, is gravelly sandy loam that is brown in the upper Representative profile in SE3NW3BE31 sec. 34, T. 27 part and dark grayish brown and prominently mottled in N., R. 2 W., 1.2 miles south of U.S. Highway 101 along the lower part. The next layer is a dark grayish-brown Mt. Walker Road, 15 feet east of road. cemented layer that formed in very compact glacial till. 01-8 inches to 1 inch,needles,leaves,twigs,bark,moss,and frag. Rounded pebbles cobblestones,and stones are on the surface manta of wood. and throughout the profile. 02-1 inch too,dftwapogo4 arcepie litter. Alderwood roils are used mainly for tree production and B21ir—°to 3 inches,dark (SYR 3/4)very gravelly for wildl fe habitat and recreation areas.Less than 30 percent loam, ranula brown re;� 5/4) dry; weak, fine and vky, of the is used for growing pasture plants,hay plants, fine,.granular structure; t, very friable, slightly sticky, plastic,smeary;many fine, medium, and large roots;66 per- and dive farm crops. cent angular basalt pebbles;medium acid;clear,wavy bound. Aged Ally sandy Ioa a,,0 to 15 percent ary.(2 to 6 inches thick) elopes (A ).-Tflds nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial B22ir-3 to 20 inches,dark-red (2.5YR 3/6) very gravelly loam, reddish brown(2.5YR 6/4)dry;weak,tine granular and Nwlr 'r r. Yn most places the slope is 5 to 10 percent. angular blocky steuctnre; soft, very friable, slightly stinky, Representative profile 100 yards west of house, southwest plastic, ;many fine, medium,p Metal r+ silo of Beausite Lake; SE3NE3SE3 sec. 28, T. 29 N., cent angular mint pebbles and ¢ pupm j , l W.: medium acid;gradual,wavy boundary,(10 U IN' ) B3-20 to 30 inches,reddish-brown SYlt 4/4) l , 01-1h Inches to 34 inch,needles,leaves,bark,and fragments of light reddish brown (6YR 6/4) dry ma�l .,i _ wood yy,na� pleetio,c Iaryy; .isles; 1 02-44 inch to 0,black(5YR 2/1) decayed leaves,needles, augur basalt*bhs;dighuY R�1 iINV <, =, sty bark, and fragments of wood; acid; abrupt, wavy (8 to 12 inches thick) boundary. to 1Minches C-30 to 38 inches,90 portent Natured basalt , 5L4A1 A9-0 to 1 very dark gr wn (10YR 3/2) gravelly in voids is reddish-brown (AYR 4/4) very itly bM,light fine sandy loam,pale brown(10YR 6/3)dry;wak very fine, 1 • 4' ' JEFFERSON COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON 9 granular structure; soft, very friable, nonstick' and non- loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, as well as small areas of Plastic; many fine and medium roots• 25 percent pebbles; Everett, Indianola, Hoypus, Sinclair, and Whidbey soils, medium acid;clear,smooth boundary. (j to IX inches thick) B2lhen-1 to 6 inches,dark yellowish-brown(10YR 4/4)gravelly 15 to$0 percent slopes. sandy loam Yale brown (10YR 6/8) ,weak,fine,granular Run `is raid and the hazard of water erosion is severe. structure; hard, friable, shgh y sticky and slightly soil is used for tree production and for wildlife habitat plastic; medi roots; common hard iron-n- and recreation areas. Capability unit We-1;woodland group manganese concretions;; 40 c gra medium acid gradual,wavy boundary. (4 to 6 inches thick 3d2. B22iron-6 to 12 inches,dark owish-brown(10 4/4)gravelly Alderwood gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes lai.dy loans,pale brawn lOYR 6/8) erg,fine,subangu- (AmC).—This nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial terraces. blocky structure; tly bard,fre,slightly stinky and The surface layer and subsoil are gravelly loam. slightly plastic;many a and medium roots;common hard Included with this soil in mapping small tracts having iron-manganese concretions;40 percent pebbles;;slkhtly acid; PPmg ving lea Wa�ou5day�sto 7 inches truce — s$ale or sandWati a-de of-20-to-36innahes. B8-12 to 21 inches brown (10YR 4/8)gravelly sandy loam,pale Permeability is moderate. This soil holds 3 to 6 inches of brown (10YR 6/8) dry;weak fine subangular blocky struc- ' Lure; slightly hardi friable, slightly sticky, slightly tic; water available for plants. many fine and medium roots;45 percent g vei;aptly acid; This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife clear,smooth boundary. 6 to 12 inches thick) habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit We-1; wood- C1-21 to 80 inches, dark• yam,brown (10YR 4 ) gravelly land 3d2. Y.0YR 7/2)dry;many mecum, roml- Alderwood gravelly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes sandy loam , may_ R 4/6) mottles; massive; hazA firm, (AmD).—This moderately steep soil is in areas where the slightly sticky, tttll� plastic. few fine and medium roots; 45 percent gravel; medium acid; gradual, wavy bound rolling upland glacial terraces converge with the steep (4 to 16 inches thick) boundary. drainageway ravines. The surface layer and subsoil are Claim cemented 80 to 48 inches, darkgrayish-brown (10YR 4/2) weakly gravelly loam. gravelly sandy loam, t gray (10YR 7/2) dry; This soil holds 8 to 6 inches of water available for plants. many comae, prominent, yellowish-red (5Y 4/6) mottles. mas vie; eto 18 inohes xtremely' )extremely firm; no roots; slightly': Permeability is moderate. Runoff is medium to rapid, and 08-48 inches,very compact gravelly sandy loam glacial till.(Many the hazard of erosion is moderate to severe. feet thick) This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife The depth to the cemented habitat and recreation areas.Capability unit We-1;woodland The A2 depth to th horizons layer from 20 to 40 inches. group 3d2. The to dark yellowish B2i brown.Their range of very dark grayish brown Alderwood-Quilcene complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes from 20 to 50 percent and averages more than 85 percent.In places (AUC).—This mapping unit is made up of about 60 percent the upper part of the Cl horizon is compact 5ravelly loamy sand. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, and Fes,and hard iron-manganese concretions are in A2, about 30 percent Quiloene silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes. iron horizons. The mostly rolling Alderwood soil is on glacial moraines. Small areas of sandy, very gravelly, or cobbly soils are The nearly level to strongly sloping e I cane soil is mostly included with this soil in ma in areas anent to the moraines. A ut 10 percent of the This soil is moderately well drained. Permeability above acreage iserett, Hoypus, and Indianola toils. the cemented layer is moderately rapid. Roots penetrate to Mgt of this acreage is wooded. A small acreage has been cleared the cemented layer and flatten out on top of it. A perched woodland planted to pasture. Capability unit We-1; water table is above the cemented layer during the winter woodland group 3d2. months. This plants. Runoff isdslow to medium, and the hazard of water Beausite Series erosion is slight to moderate. The Beausite series consists of well-drained soils underlain This soil is used for permanent pasture of mixed grasses by strongly cemented sandstone conglomerate at a depth of and legumes. Both hay and silage are commonly produced. 20 to 36 inches. They are on the sides of valleys, mostly Small grams, vegetables, berries, and fruit trees are also south and southeast of Discovery Bay in the northeastern grown. Capability unit We-1;woodland group 3d2. part of Jefferson County.Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent Elevation ranges from 50 to 1,500 feet. These soils formed slopes (AID).—This moderately steep soil is in planes where under a dominantly coniferous forest in weathered con- the rolling glace upland terraces converge toward ravines glomerate consisting of mixed acid and basic rooks. Annual and steep d � precipitation ranges from 30 to 40 inches. The average is medium to rapid, and the hazard of water annual air temperature is about 50°F. The above °F erosion is moderate to severe. This soil is used mainly for growing season ranges from about 220 to 250 days, and the tree production and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. above 28°F growing season from about 270 to 300 It is also suited to permanent hay and pasture crops. Cape- days. These soils are associated mainly with Alderwood, bility emit VIe-1;woodland group 3d2. Everett,Indianola,Quilcene,and Sinclair soils. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter slopes. (AIE).—This steep soil is on glaciated uplands, covers the surface. The upper 22 inches of the soil is gravelly generally in small areas along steep morainal margins or sandy loam that is dark brown in the upper part and dark canyon sidewalls. On the upper third of the slopes, the yellowish brown in the lower part. Below this, to a depth of surface layer and subsoil are often 20 to 24 inches thick 33 inches, is brown and grayish-brown very gravelly sandy over the cemented layer. Along the bottom slopes, depth to loam.Beneath,this layer is strongly cemented,very gravelly the cemented layer is 80 to 40 inches. sandstone ...i _ omerate. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Beausite . are used mainly for tree production and for Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and Alderwood gravelly wildlife habitat and recreation areas. cm ENGINEERING w=.. LAND SURVEYING z. k ✓ V I L 4 • ° 301 East 6th Street,Suite 1 ° t :i f_ Port Angeles.Washington 98362 INCORPORATED C E O V E (360)417-0501 fax(360)417-0514 E-mail:zenovic@olvmpus.net APR 2 4 2012 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 20. 2009 Franz and Janice Gruber 102 East Fir Street Port Ludlow, WA 98365-8773 Re: Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow Par. No. 821-233-001 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gruber: Zenovic&Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the west side of Hood Canal, east of Port Ludlow, Jefferson County. The property is situated along the shoreline of Hood Canal at the east end of East Fir Street. Access to the site is from East Fir Street, off of Paradise Bay Road, approximately two miles north of Highway 104 at the west end of the Hood Canal Bridge. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. A portion of the site is mapped as an Unstable—Recent Slide slope on the Jefferson County Shoreline Map. Slopes designated as recent slides are based on evaluations completed in the 1970s. Subsequent sliding has not been documented by the State and is subject to our review and conclusions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will not induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website(1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (USDA/SCS, August, 1975), the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, ano Jefferson County Unified Development Code. r it t S V "t ft e t v t< a t • •r* li gyp., },y f Page 2 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, a significant area comprised of the Alderwood-Sinclair soil association extends south and east from Discovery Bay to the Admiralty Inlet/Hood Canal shoreline, encompassing the majority of the easterly portion of Jefferson County, including the Dabob and Coyle peninsulas. The subject site is located in the easterly portion of the mapped soil association. The Alderwood-Sinclair soils are typically moderately well-drained, dominantly strongly sloping to steep, gravelly soils underlain by glacial till. Inspection of the soil maps of the site indicate that the property lies within an area of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, that extends throughout the developed area along Paradise Bay Road. The Alderwood soils are derived from weathered glacial till. These soils were deposited by the ice sheet during the Vashon stade glaciation. The Vashon Glacial Till consists of a poorly sorted mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashon-age ice sheet. Finer portions of the soil consist of clay, silt, and sand. These fine particles comprise a moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components (gravel, cobbles, and boulders)are firmly imbedded. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic&Associates, Inc. conducted a site visit on April 21, 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immediate subsurface hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. Existing Slopes The property has a gently sloping upland area, with a gradient of approximately 2 to 3 percent downhill from west to east, terminating at a near vertical marine bluff of approximately 50 feet in height. The toe of the bluff is situated on the shoreline of Hood Canal. The bluff has a relatively consistent slope with a gradient of in excess of 150%. The upper portion of the bluff is a near vertical formation while the lower portion is less steep. The material creating the less steep slope at the base of he bluff is the colluvial material that has eroded from the bluff face due to wind erosion and the natural freeze- thaw cycle that loosens the bluff soils. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently Alderwood soil types as shown on the Soil Survey maps. Inspection of the bluff face indicates that the depth of the surficial gravelly sand loam is typically deeper than is typical for the Alderwood soils, extending to depths of up to 60 inches. These more gravelly soils are less stable than the underlying compact glacial till, so some sloughing of the upper area of the bluff face is anticipated. Page 3 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 Vegetation Site vegetation consists of well maintained lawn throughout the majority of the site. A small area of the native coniferous forest with a dense understory of brush covers the westerly third of the property. Two large fir trees(48" diameter) are located approximately 20 feet from the top of the bluff. Hydrology and Drainage The upland area of the site is basically flat as is the tributary area to the west. No drainageways were observed on the upland area of the property or on the face of the bank. International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand, silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for structures within 75 feet of the top of the bank. CONCLUSIONS The bank is shown to be unstable—recent slides in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas. This determination is based on review of available aerial photography in the 1970's and does not reflect the current situation. However, the face of the bluff does show some minor weakness, so a setback for development is appropriate. The standard bluff setback of one foot for each foot of height is reasonable to provide adequate protection of any structures. This setback will be approximately 50 feet for the site; decks and similar appurtenances may extend into the setback area consistent with Section 18.25.410(j) of the Uniform Development Code. RECOMMENDATIONS General The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Page 4 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 • Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches feet below the existing surface grade. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 31. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided to direct the runoff from all new impervious surfaces into a new infiltration system that is located a minimum of 75 feet from the top of the bank. No runoff from impervious surfaces shall be permitted to flow over the edge of the bluff. Slope Maintenance Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System The septic tank and pump chamber for the existing on-site sewage disposal system are located approximately 25 feet from the top of the bank. These tanks and associated piping may remain in place. The area around these two tanks should be inspected on a regular basis to make sure that no leakage is occurring. Visual inspection of the lawn area around the tanks for unusual growth will be adequate. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a steep bank on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein is the property of the Grubers and may not be used without their permission. The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. Page 5 Mr. and Mrs. Franz Gruber—Property on East Fir Street, Port Ludlow May 20, 2009 We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely, Zennvic&Associates, Inc. / f:jp8 hen M. Zenovic, P.E. �4 Wits / P incipai Engineer ��,� .�. • °z C3 Enclosures Fc: JN 09073 * '* I ,t. r Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 821233001 05/14/2007 Owner Mailing Address: FRANZ GRUBER JANICE J GRUBER 102 E FIR ST • PORT LUDLOW WA 983658773 Site Address: Section: 23 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SW 1/4 Fire Dist: Port Ludlow(3) Township: 28N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Paradise Bay(8) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND QCD 5/28/02 94718 Property Description: S23 T28 R1E I LOT 1 (S100') I I I El No Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=821233001... 5/21/2009 i "a6,6-- I `- ' .,, ..,,ti-li.:11V113 V leW GI .., , ....4.4 2a.7.1 „3,..,:i._,,,,._.,_„, ,_,*_34,..., c,,..,,.._\„:,,,,,,,z,,,:„.4 ,,.4.,..,. sa 0',1 .• 0-1*',,,,‘,..18:1,10.---„,, ,,..„ ... ...2.4,...--- „4 1.,..,.....11 -'''-' 9..,,340:"'''-'' :e.,,4,:-..c.a.- 8,,..6 4.,.«.„,-...,,i0lV lt'. cN tb?'i 9 E-,7-4.6,2A.,-.,--,n,-3z,-'1,1f-'..2)4.i:.::.6n i*2•*€. .,z-..-.--,c.•9.'C-3' ..*.. t 3e,:(4C'.0.=„23:2 1C,1:,c„ 'Wc i 3cc,,.-:...! 34-082 40r0i 4 W 5PrmSI 4 e30.403 24CO23 4 *- „ cc ce„14005'8,6 1:340:70b s4‘,53,1CC62'-2 ir,r7,4*0198MCX:62. ,- '''''''''t;IF' - !9.54f.A.'.4X:.04 - ._,t,* „,„*.3*Ar' -•,--- * --:-...c.3:„....„„* ,r,,,,,- „,;-- ,„,. 4 ..,* *' lk* ' **81-407 4.b''''8-7,'+• 4t. -E.'-`1C.7:5-4-... '',z'6 4'.*6 6t7 76 - ,. .......,-,50.4 34c.:**D0' , 9eACCurY * ., .5e3.1(_.2.':*..,- V , t 41ir,,f-ic t ...4,8,-_,40 ,„.„ te....1 1 _,,....,,,,,r_,,ir„, .,..44,,..)-_,,i',.-:, - ..*.4 40., '''L S--,8-"'-- '-'` ' ---"''' -44r,-,,,,,,tte 1,2.1',24 :14'. w2,1t-2.-i4•4 ,; . E, 1..... .,..,',18-:.:-.....mil . ., / 6 4,1 Aft9e340•-"1*-t ."1/7""w4*, .„,, .2.83.4,-A.,4 - , ., _ 46 ., sa?„4.0_,C=4 - ,,,,., ..ti 24 0 4 ,.2 L ."0,4r,:iL * MOC.,3r-12 4,-,,,a, 40,-.1‘.4 .77,__, , i, .„...34,..... , ,,,.,. ; It t‘A34C.-.1-VY4'”" ..., , ,,k4E A Si ,.* '834Cf--3 F Ce,lcr-) * -mr...4,., ''i c+11 ' 4 * Se.34t2 - W Ce3<:°--• 1---.-Jr Si52-4C'Y'2 ,...," 4 v_ii& 40 .,. •-, 1,,,, ,,,-,-,2c.:4 s,c3.540::•e4 W.'34k-''' '-', -' 34-"" Ait 41,41. e.s.4.c 4534e_10-i:PE --,,- - s,smeyy*'3 Ostv.91* .'" 34v„, ,.e -:„.,, . ,8340;:2:2L ..,,10 9.8.,,,,-- st,..34„....,,0-•=5NV 82.2:i3a: ,, , ,' 4;:,....3402''=4 61 #0. -;ti Ill It' ‘ ,,,,,, • ; 1 - • *.)-'2•'-' _* 4- AL:1**-74T , A _ F FIT' ...1111-- - - illri2'2€2 ,,,,* 46„ w Ft,.,,,t ' '411° .14..11... ., ,;0^4 82.21.t) S. ,, 4 104;11.-' 62-'ki'C'.4' ''' - -- ,:- 4 f '''''''' 14 * '? ; ..t..IF., lit,`-.$--.'' 84. '*. - 2•21'`U'l '2 ... . „. --' ''% ... 44 ' ,, ,..,• #, ,,t„,, , , ,, % .. , .. . 40, - , ;.r., 5..,.0-8 ........-4 ,; , -4r. t,., At„,,,,„ 2?•-Y_:4 • * 7, &,,,,, -•.4#8.4 • „..--... 't.' *,-'ltitti „AF-. , 7 * fir'rh-',/t. fa,,,,.. „..4"'-r A* V ,4* , 4„ ',*-- ....2/ 0t1 ,A 7. 1_, ..301.,. — al ,.. ,,, 40,44,404414.47.4741'7":- 4' t':-.. # 4k7,0 -N,3/4, , , '''. 7eit i''.t.,* '11..',' 44F 4 ' No. - 4 tit *,,. ea* '"'N 154 - 4w • , '''''‘ , - ' 4".4111* * - -", --' '' ' :,„,,,,',:.t.,, :::,'''*).- -x,**- ,,.- - ' ,*- It•k. - 62 *Mr Z221 1:' -4 44,':-,,,**14,,,,, , -.6. / * 4 , - ,-' '7, iv. - ..-_.. •i . , . owl -2,04C) OTC) j1)\reSa'l ___ ikt- *'. 1\A :A4-9 4/14/2009 s cojeffers http://rnaP - on.wa.us/Website/mspubfl\4apFrarne.htm ArciMS Viewer rage 1 or 2 • - : ; I ,,-- ' ( 98/40526 i 98.340223 93,140C*X": te,..40L.:24'--,524 01 ____K.:14(1.322 2,54 ,.7 982,..,,1 ,:=1:, S 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111111 I i 983400513 : . i .- 983400568 98-340%10 f - (933,4005T4 . 't 7 953406509 9834005',11 1 i ,.. .. ig _,...i 1," : : i • Ifirlititi Illre irr`P.4. ' • .....1.:3-4c. : • , ,...:-.,534c•-•35-..€ r 1 ,.." ) 9.,.8.34014( •' :mica St 983401407 i 40:,408 W.-3400419 i : . : ::• w ' 953404r6 :'--- b\ : --48 2.+1.X.1 I a- " - 983400424 i 98340421 (9,8"34,a22, 9.5340041g f 983.40;w7 F---t- 04134CA-142i: ., . ..._._...._..... . ....___- ,, , i - 9a340024 983400104 i "' ' I 9.33.409t08 , . ( ••••- I ( sole"44n',1.2 — , . . 9834°°2°-3 --' (98-34881103 ,' : „ : 98.340TTAS: 951400109 : 953400(513 9834t03114 .933400105 963400112. ( ,,- .4834tr2o2 96,..3400102 , ": -...,_,„ , . 993480201- 0 / i (5. ' • 1 1--(•-•'--,=', •"'" .:(' W Fir St '-' i '- - - F Fir St "".'- - '. - - . .......______. • , . . . ., , . '.,....,., . 821X2 ...,"2 , . , , ' --, . , .- .. - . . : . , . 1.- I B2T2720t4, 1 52274 ! 821271°t5. 1------- . ..._ • i ((j . . -....._ • , . i • •: a• 1 , 1 , .. • . , .,, , _ 82126X*3 1 ',• - 821271.(381( ! •::: .-• '• i t \,, 8212/101, ' . „ . i : 821252011 ( •,..°--.,,,,, •.:::., ( : ( .? - • : . . • tr212/.!_ ta , : • 1 822 •i. i'. ; ..-- .• • - 16:20'S2 1, : '- , , ' . Max.7.a....-Aisd by..L'em'un Coxty Ce%,-.4 Se-vicm GS 821211°19 - .. . . , . 1,,..., '-1-1Z CA-S--"-TevQ• Ctl0,1: 4-1(.._ rl.i ii...,?. c....A-0.04.- t1-51.trOJ At r- "il 0 http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Website/mspubilvlapFrame.htrn 5/21/2009 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 +t 9.1-..:14C1-‘,.....? k 7 • '. i±._`+52_+1 '48340C.! 3 . ,014.x. Q? 983103M3 `+a3+lC'.4C�" :3�tcr:' :" 11834r:03 P' a3.{__Ice g+31_=Tti 1 ?v3't=+� °_3,tr_aC,, 9E240.e�G: ?i°?7„:',Z? 3tC=.5^c, >'aH++ ,?j5 34OY 24 ?E34 OL' wB34'k`"3 33t"? S 9834,X€1. 9834 l 3i q 2,i "3 i3�.i5-I *sa'rS .F.w '483400'_ca g8340740"0 983df#:n'A y Whei i k5t' Eti�mtc:k St dv"f4OrY \ 9431C=t=v 311Cc1`t04 + t 34CN:4"C' v C,h<"3 `4534::'$<rj �, 92;,ICC124 S831C242C =-a3+3.xil"_ "". ",.?i a.4E .c "r.-5:.'4c.."2,3',""9 "...-,.5.24,X4.1" ..v;'i.°_4te' ... 98.34/..2.-i- '4C .1 :y, ,n +e itr2t 1 X31 3-2'+1r s{iv »,. 11€:,i..i __ixy 2 953," ,_"?A- 3dC'4"' C7. 3.-dC_L 4 ;:-i_:c'_ :?3 dr CM ?E31;_ ''t ?! ,it` 31C ‘ 22'2?'•""u 3 0,2,2°C � 1 � . 'et. 4iA"6 ' � `W p,,,5f fhr St F ?2tfecC 1 82°2_`2`::13 .2.z?.€1^',1;)1 .. -.. - a2-2:52c-:-.4, .0 $ 8282C8 822 sl"... ?' j(j}I 1. ik .rP 82......i 50+ t 5/21/2409 http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/inspub/MapFrame.htrn ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 , . --"u4r.:2.:2`b.."..-.4.-.., S'.3.340'2(V_4143:340!203 c..634or202.9e 340"'02 ,,.X160;. rilk.22-10.20`4. SAMO"'P.".2.., 2.4.0V-,2 A"Mq34E 5.t ' E At pt S t ?AC,',.....".4 b A.., ,10.C2:2 98.3401V2 '- .. . . ge`,34O'S .-.12)12..3153 ' „....0,...--„.A,....„3„.......,L, ‘, , __,-- '..-,840c-c'Ec,4 ,,..., ----, _Sa...i-*iecl•-02c4 qs.„40--=.--,- , .. - v.--Ataf!„..r St St =',,12"10'1:°21:"H c..18-mceerA 5.334001'E S33400P2r 1.,:e?,,,,,,c4:10,.. , v.-,•,------• „ .„ 1.-:,424:4.Y..)fr......, 3.H.,,it- ,E,.c... • -Q`-'4-24'.-''=/'f i.k.S340,-'2,t7.9 . , -u -'Jr. ,,,-.""?=-4'..-...,2,342..!-S- -...-3-3.1.-:•C‘e.i..:,2 ,-..,,'-4 Sikti,±4,........k:'' Se2-4C-i..,f`4 . .5,,e2,14,2x);•••0 - , _ ,. , _ C-X-n'',:e. "-,'1.'"-2...4CC.,.3.2.- /f/zt 4CC23 98.34.7.4.2, :,,,334rif.a.622 - - :- SaS4e62 '''.. 34'-"r- .,..- - `.8.--'-4i';.:,-br.r.4 9e340,-,!..-0, 98714e4:6'2 08;24CP5 / '..t.- . . . . , c._.1e-,343051 Wi-tr.,,tic,,,k St f-l-te.-ntr,sl•-St '''-- - ''-a'34,2.`-1:: . . ---- S...8.41.:0"..:(_-'22,1 ::!..53,100 .".- °4,' :-.4.3.4ci:..c:•.:...4....,-2 Se-24IC*3424 - seaqc-z-i's 9.634:•-•.:4'.1: C23.40" 4:X.',42-, ,..;12•?...iri."frit,•,, , - ' - \Ai.:..7 E.3.-.7., St F. C4,....1c.., St -- - -•--^-- - 484,1y..?',::•:?. 9e24E•cy•iile , - - . .„, . . , 204 ile3-4r_v.:.",..%4 9,u1- ''.-' W.,34C'''' I . ..., .. , :-.ki.,,4•.:,‘,:.-r..i...,1..- aa:-!.-1■7(..`,2,:)," -- 1, 982402u- 963407:"C€ 93400tOg ' S8',140,322 -;-a 1.-..":"...2 ,..--_ __ . b 5 t-TE, 62-:-2, y„*.o. ',A.'Fir St !:.hr St - '., 14A4kri4400(.1%4L14V' .82t2S2002 82'2? 4 .F.242?---te,-6. . . 322 r•0'4 - 32r26.2C.03 . „ . 82".21,0`t .E.2'4EI.20'• 3'2'i•''.222,,z 821,2620'2 , :<-,,, 82•2■52C-Or''',, : E2`2,',;'.k,... 2'2"..,`,'"Y''.. , . IN http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Websiteimspub/MapFrame.htm 5/21/2009 • 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON - SHEET NUME (Joins inset) R 1 E 2--)''''''-',----; c': t•fit. - ' : (`` �{ii fist 1;. ! ''''' ' ,i, r\,- = -_-_-, ..-rfi- ,.......-- ,-.--,:-:-„,,,-„, -, -',2-....--.,. .:., .-: 2 -- A, 1 rt. 4.. \ -,,,,i.:,),---...-„:„.,..,-..-:_:,,-._:.,-, ....- ...._. ....,..�...:.:..::.ir.:.;, I, cfP \ f 1 ) ,/. --c,:..,„_ -,-- i - , .'... - . , ' ..,---. ---:: ., 1 jr Tel-n-ttkt�t- itiogo,,f,c-;.,_,,,Ivi?.."-=...1_. -' � e i;"t- �� :f.- 1 555 000 FEET 8 i• h - .... ... Y r \lieN � wr`Y r n. w ha , :,,,,---s,,,'''- *` �0 ..: J��, JIB • -fC4s•S ; 4� �"sf / ' - . , )Mt�r'� Pro; ,� r 1-J1 �' , .� `,4* } T -fir: '�' fi• l : } (�. r p nS vi�I+f, Pte. •� -.'W:Of f�.f # a'a+ ''Y ! i Y T (Joins upper left) j R. 1 E. 1 565 000 FEE S SOIL SURVEY slightly acid;gradual, ; 60 inches. The soil holds 10 or more inches of water available wavy bound . (4 to 12 inches thick)reddish brown (5YR 6/4)dry;massive; for plants. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion R-3g inches,basalt bedrock. is slight. A seasonal water table is at a depth of 1 to 2 feet. Depth to basalt bedrock ranges from 24 to 40 inches. The Bir About 60 to 70 percent of the acreage is used for crops. horizons are very gravelly loam or very gravelly silt loam. The C Pasture,hay, and silage from mixed grasses and legumes are horizon is more than 80 percent fractured basalt bedrock. the principal crops. A variety of garden vegetables, berries, Included with this soil in. mapping are small areas of and tree fruits may be grown. Capability unit I11w-1;wood- k outcrop and of Triton soils. land group 3d2. This soil is well drained. Permeability is moderate. Roots Agnew silt loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes (A penetrate to the bedrock. This soil holds 2 to 4 inches of This soil is mainly along ocean bluffs or canyon si silty w c1Ia. water available for plants. Runoff is very rapid, and the The subsoil in many places contains strata of silty clay of erosion is very severe. loam, fine sandy loam, silty clay, and sandy clay loam. This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit VIIe-1; wood- Most areas of this soil are wooded. When used for building land group 3d2. sites, the soil often slides when saturated. Capability unit Ahl-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent slopes VIe-1; woodland group 3d2. (AkF).—This mapping unit is made up of about 50 to 70 percent Ahl very gravelly loam. It is 30 to 50 percent Rock AM Series outcrop and stony areas.The Ahl soil is 24 to 30 inches deep in most places. The Ahl series consists of well-drained,very gravelly loam Almost all the acreage of the complex is used for tree soils underlain by basalt bedrock at a depth of 24 to 40 production and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. inches. These soils are on mountainous terrain. Slopes range Capability unit VIIs-1;woodland group 4x2. from 50 to 90 percent. Elevation ranges from 800 to about 3,000 feet. These soils formed in weat basalt under a �derwoo.1 Series dominantly coniferous forest of Douglas-fir,western hemlock The Alderwood series consists of moderately well drained and western redcedar.Annual precipitation is 60 to 80 inches. The average annual air temperature is about 49°F. The soils that have a very slowly permeable cemented layer at a above 32°F growing season ranges from 150 to 190 days, depth of 20 to 40 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 180 to 230 Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. These soils formed in days. These soils are associated mainly with Grove, Lystair, glacial till under a forest of mixed coniferous and broad- Olete, and Triton soils. leaved vegetation. Annual precipitation ranges from 25 to • In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter 50 inches. The average annual air temperature is about covers the surface. The upper 3 inches of the soil is dark 49°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from 160 to reddish-brown very gravelly loam. Below this,to a depth of 260 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 30 inches,is very gravelly loam that is dark red in the upper 220 to 320 days. These soils are associated mainly with part and reddish brown in the lower part. Beneath this,and Beausite, Casey, Clallam, Dick, Everett, Hoypus, Indianola, extending to a depth of 38 inches, is mostly angular basalt Sinclair, and Whidbey soils. pebbles and fractured, weathered basalt. Basalt bedrock is In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter at a depth of 38 inches. covers the surface. The top 1 inch of the soil is very dark Ahl soils are used mainly for tree production and for wild- grayish-brown gravelly fine sandy loam. Below this, to a life habitat and recreation areas. depth of 12 inches, is dark yellowish-brown gravelly sandy Ahl very gravelly loam, 50 to 70 percent slopes loam. Beneath this layer, and continuing to a depth of 30 (AhF).—This very steep soil is in the mountains. inches, is gravelly sandy loam that is brown in the upper Representative profile in SEi4NW/SE% sec. 34, T. 27 part and (lark grayish brown and prominently mottled in. N., R. 2 W., 1.2 miles south of U.S. Highway 101 along the lower part. `l h'. next layer is a dark grayish brown Mt.Walker Road, 15 feet east of road. cemented nted E aye t that formed in very compact glacial till. 01-3 inches to 1 inch,needles,leaves,twigs,bark,moss,and frag- U.f'ilitehf*d I>a hI.I, a ati7lila'stones,and stones are on the surface ments of wood. .a1111 #Iirntlghx,al#. #he profile. 02-1 inch to 0, decomposing organic litter. . Meer ,,,al :oils are used mainly for tree production and B21ir-0 to 3 inches,dark reddish-brown (5YR 3/I) very r av4-11y i', t V.11,,,fr 0:4011:it .tx�tl recreation areas.Less than 30 percent loam, reddish brown ('2.5YR 5/1) dry; 1vt_a:ai,, line alp! tt'r fine, granular structure; sort, very friable, ,laatlaah u,1 � ,{1 Ow Iwo 1at a a as t 11 lilr growing pasture plants, hay plants, plastic, smeary; many tine., *metlimn, tind .W.0'' a alai: ,, pet- Alta .1, a,:I#a tl iliaat rtip.S. cent angular basalt pebbles;medium arid;„le,,,-, tAr:tv4,t 1s.,uri,! tl.1 + 3a „ail 1gr.avw.lI sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent ary. (2 to 6 inches thick) ,lfr#�a tAll 1 l'llis nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial B22ir-3 to 20 rnfhe9, da1r) red e) ,1 1t; > iii vet , ,et±lib It1a, 4 aa ,�, lir rtn,r�}t laces the slope is 5 to 10 percent. reddish brown (2,5�1'`ll , 1} r1,� a+°;.t! 4144, 1 i4a:34-tt Mel t,4= angular blocky tit Maui t v,la t,,.. 1„314,, A to,1 at,# u, lea; tail,a#,ivai profile 100 yards west of house, southwest plastic, smeary; many M)A nE•°,l,ta„, 1... ..a.e 1-,4,,t, 1 r,= iota- 4 114'.ta.,littl hake; SEYINEASEX sec. 28, T. 29 N., 1l1t, ,n,1 ,a,�,. o. 'w taaa,lb-a1 , Ili = 11_ I v? Cent angular aa..akl#7 jtf , medium acid,graatlitasl, ,v4,:t.t 4Hxrs lt, ,['t t;, IA tot to:,,111,k B3-20 to 30 inch, thi,it t.,., rt t 'ill i ii `f ill to f 1l 1F „,t, t al” t 1 111404.4 to .i inch, needles,leaves,bark,and fragments of light reddish bra''.ti (.,11; a 11 .1, ,it 4 , a tis ltiu=, +s=ayi1, nonsticky, nonplra_atlar, tot*,3f ,.a.,,n tt f.t ," ,' a'> a ,an.'Ii tu►0,black(5YR 2/1)partly decayed leaves,needles, angular basalt pitbbla':a,Alg14i I, It.....1 t toltt..) - f 1 .,;' 1,:ariw, raid fragments of wood; medium acid; abrupt, wavy (8 to 12 incho Iltiek) 1,..,;,,,loty. (,w to 1%inches thick) C-30 to 38 inches, l)0 l,xaty n , ti-' f t 1 t ' i.• iliac „only fl iarn, pale brown YR 6/3)(dry;weak,very fine, in voids is raddislt=t�rtlwaa (tV ll ' JEFFERSON COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON 9 granular structure; soft, very friable, nonsticky and non-. loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, as well as small areas of plastic; many fine and medium roots; 25 percent pebbles; Everett, Indianola, Hoypus, Sinclair, and Whidbey soils, medium acid;clear,smooth boundary.(34 to 134 inches thick) 15 30 percent slopes. B2lircn-1 to 6 inches,dark yellowish-brown(10YR 4/4)gravelly p p es sandy loam,pale brown (10YR 6/3)dry;weak,fine,granular Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. structure; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky and slightly This soil is used for tree production and for wildlife habitat plastic; many fine and medium roots; common hard iron- and recreation areas. Capability unit VIe-1;woodland group manganese concretions; 40 percent gravel; medium acid; 3d2 gradual,wavy boundary. (4 to 6 inches thick) B22ircn-6 to 12 inches,dark yellowish-brown(10YR.4/4)gravelly Alderwood gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes sandy loam,pale brown(10YR 6/3)dry;weak,fine,subangu- (AmC).—This nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial terraces. lar blocky structure;slightly hard, friable,slightly sticky and The surface layer and subsoil are gravelly loam. slightly plastic;many fine and medium roots; common hard Included with this soil in mapping are small tracts having iron-manganese concretions;40 percent pebbles;slightly acid; clear,wavy boundary. (5 to 7 inches thick) shale or sandstone at a depth of 20 to 36 inches. B3-12 to 21 inches,brown (10YR 4/3)gravelly sandy loam,pale Permeability is moderate. This soil holds 3 to 6 inches of brown (10YR 6/3) dry; weak, fine, subangular blocky struc- water available for plants. ture; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife many fine and medium roots;45 percent gravel;slightly acid; clear, smooth boundary. (6 to 12 inches thick) habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit IVe-i; wood- C1-21 to 30 inches, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) gravelly land group 3d2. sandy loam,light gray(10YR 7/2)dry;many medium,proms- Alderwood gravelly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes Went, yellowish-red (5YR 4/6) mottles; massive; hard, firm, (AMD).—This moderately steep soil is in areas where the slightly sticky, slightly plastic; few fine and medium roots; 45 percent gravel; medium acid; gradual, wavy boundary_ rolling upland glacial terraces converge with the steep (4 to 16 inches thick) drainageway ravines. The surface layer and subsoil are C2sim-30 to 48 inches, dark grayish.brown (10YR 4/2) weakly gravelly loam. cemented gravelly sandy loam, light gray (10YR 7/2) dry; This soil holds 3 to 6 inches of water available for plants. many coarse, prominent, yellowish-red (5YR 4/6) mottles; massive; extremely hard, extremely firm; no roots; slightly Permeability is moderate. Runoff is medium to rapid, and acid. (10 to 18 inches thick) the hazard of erosion is moderate to severe. C3-48 inches,very compact gravelly sandy loam glacial till.(Many This soil is used mainly for tree production and for wildlife feet thick) habitat and recreation areas.Capability unit VIe-1;woodland The depth to the cemented layer ranges from 20 to 40 inches. group 3d2. The A2 and B2ircn horizons range from very dark grayish brown Alderwood-Quilcene complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes to dark yellowish brown.Their content of coarse fragments ranges (AuC).--This mapping unit is made up of about 60 percent from 20 to 50 percent and averages more than 35 percent.in places Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, and the upper part of the Cl horizon is compact gravelly loamy sand. Y Y P p Few to many hard iron-manganese concretions are in the A2, about 30 percent Quilcene silt loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes. . B2ircn,and B22ircn horizons. The mostly rolling Alderwood soil is on glacial moraines. Small areas of sandy, very gravelly, or cobbly soils are The nearly level to strongly sloping Quilcene soil is mostly included with this soil in mapping. in areas adjacent to the moraines. About 10 percent of the pp g . acreage is Everett, Hoypus, and Indianola soils. This soil is moderately well drained. Permeability above Most of this acreage is wooded. A small acreage has been the cemented layer is moderately rapid. Roots penetrate to cleared and planted to pasture. Capability unit IVe-1; the cemented layer and flatten out on top of it. A perched woodland group 3d2. water table is above the cemented layer during the winter months. This soil holds 2 to 4 inches of water available for Beausite Series plants. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. The Beausite series consists of well-drained soils underlain This soil is used for permanent pasture of mixed grasses by strongly cemented sandstone conglomerate at a depth of and legumes. Both hay and silage are commonly produced. 20 to 36 inches. They are on the sides of valleys, mostly Small grains, vegetables, berries, and fruit trees are also south and southeast of Discovery Bay in the northeastern grown. Capability unit IVe-1;woodland group 3d2. part of Jefferson County. Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent Elevation ranges from 50 to 1,500 feet. These soils formed slopes (AID).—This moderately steep soil is in places where under a dominantly coniferous forest in weathered con- the rolling glacial upland terraces converge toward ravines glomerate consisting of mixed acid and basic rocks. Annual and steep drainageways. precipitation ranges from 30 to 40 inches. The average Runoff is medium to rapid, and the hazard of water annual air temperature is about 50°F. The above 32°F erosion is moderate to severe. This soil is used mainly for growing season ranges from about 220 to 250 days, and the tree production and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. above 28°F growing season ranges from about 270 to 300 It is also suited to permanent hay and pasture crops. Capa- days. These soils are associated mainly with Alderwood, bility unit VIe-1;woodland group 3d2. Everett, Indianola, Quilcene, and Sinclair soils. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter slopes (AIE).—This steep soil is on glaciated uplands, covers the surface. The upper 22 inches of the soil is gravelly generally in small areas along steep morainal margins or sandy loam that is dark brown in the upper part and dark canyon sidewalls. On the upper third of the slopes, the yellowish brown in the lower part. Below this, to a depth of surface layer and subsoil are often 20 to 24 inches thick 33 inches, is brown and grayish-brown very gravelly sandy over the cemented layer. Along the bottom slopes, depth to loam. Beneath,this layer is strongly cemented, very gravelly the cemented layer is 30 to 40 inches. sandstone conglomerate. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Beausite soils are used mainly for tree production and for Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and Alderwood gravelly wildlife habitat and recreation areas. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET Date Tine Comments ZL4-1 Z Y2 hr ' Ac-- z�- ra ( hr t_ft ab E -aa- ia -Pat '_ • PDC CONSISTENCY REVIENA) Project Planner: Master#MLA12-00091 Review Type Project Description BLD12-00129 I NSFR W/ATT GARAGE&A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK PRJ12-00063 NSFR W/ATT GARAGE&A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK SDP12-00024 I SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR SFR Primary: MARA I MAUCH Site Address: 1758 NW CAITLIN TER 301 SHORE DR PORTLAND OR 97229-4695 PORT LUDLOW WA, 98365 STEVE STRUNK REP 1591 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD SILVERDALE WA 98383 Project Location: arcel 821 233 001, Section 23, Township 28N,Range 1E, WM, located at 301 Shore Drive,Port Ludlow 98365 Parcel Number: 821233001 S-T-R: 23-28N-01E TotalAcreag4 1 Legal Description S23 T28 R1E LOT 1 (S100') Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: School 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Plot plan states"property line" [ ] Assessor's Map (Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES NO [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES NO Stream Type YES NO Fish&Wildlife:YES NO Pc-- Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NO 11 Seismic: YES NO vV Landslide: YES NO ' Flood: YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge AreaYES NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate Risk Disconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: _ Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface 4,2_10 Land Disturbing Activity � 'D ESA's Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 in Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru# Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required:Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other [ ] Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s)Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC:10,000 SF All others:suliect to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach:ExISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required:YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 1.) Custom Warning F Linda Atkins checked soil on 07-11-2003. Per Linda, on 7/15/03 top of bank/bluff, large evergreen (>24" in diameter). There is some loose/disturbed soil over bank,fairly heavily vegetated with small brush on bank slope. Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 2.) Geotechnical Rep ZON09-00076 See Laserfiche or MLA09-00196 for full 9/17/09 report. Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 3.) Custom Warning F Linda Atkins checked soil on 07-11-2003. Per Linda, on 7/15/03 top of bank/bluff, large evergreen (>24" in diameter). There is some loose/disturbed soil over bank,fairly heavily vegetated with small brush on bank slope. Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 4.) Geotechnical Rep ZON09-00076 See Laserfiche or MLA09-00196 for full 9/17/09 report. Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 5.) Custom Warning F Linda Atkins checked soil on 07-11-2003. Per Linda, on 7/15/03 top of bank/bluff, large evergreen (>24" in diameter). There is some loose/disturbed soil over bank,fairly heavily vegetated with small brush on bank slope. Parcel tags found for parcel 821233001 6.) Geotechnical Rep ZON09-00076 See Laserfiche or MLA09-00196 for full 9/17/09 report. Associated CASES status issued finaled description 821233001 ADR09-00042 F 911 DUPLICATE PLATE OVER THE COUNTER PERMIT MLA01-00615 PRJ03-00125 A OPEN RIGHT OF WAY&911-Shore Dr RAP01-00170 F 1/9/2002 9/30/2009 OPEN RIGHT OF WAY&911-Shore Dr MLA09-00196 ZON09-00076 A 9/10/2009 SPAAD-SITE PLAN APPROVAL ADVANCED DETERMINATION for residential development MLA12-00091 SDP12-00024 P SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR SFR PRJ12-00063 P NSFR W/ATT GARAGE&A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK BLD12-00129 P NSFR W/ATT GARAGE&A/G 250 GAL PROP TANK SEP03-00179 F 7/14/2003 3/2/2011 SOM03-00179 FIN