Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2012-00382 MLA12-00259 ItUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIN Review Type: I Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD12-00382 Received Date: 11/26/2012 SITE ADDRESS: 110 GROVES WAY PORT LUDLOW, 98365 OWNER: QUINTEN SHAY PHONE: 206-455-9650 11031 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD ISSAQUAH WA 98027-8696 THORNDYKE BAY SHORT PLAT#3 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 3 PARCEL NUMBER: 721194012 Section: 19 Township: 27 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: CATHERINE BAILEY PHONE: 360-775-5444 90 BISHOP RD PORT ANGELES WA 98363 PROJECT DESCRIPTIOr NEW ADU W/ATT GARAGE TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP ADU MAIN: 1,250 VALUATION 170,005.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: WOD CODE EDITION: 2009 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N SHORELINE: GARAGE: 1,250 CONST TYPE: SETBACK: DECK: 1,500 BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: CON WATER SYSTEM: 1 PWELL BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: 0 Exist: 0 Prop: 2 Pro : Total: 2 otal: 2 4-_ Routing Da : Type Amou aid Bv: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $1,391.35 LYK 11/26/12 139775 APPROVED Plan Check $904.38 LYK 11/26/12 139775 State Building Code $4.50 LYK 11/26/12 139775 FEB '7 2013 Potable Water Application $64.00 LYK 11/26/12 139775 Jefferson County DCD Total: $2,364.23 \\+irlomor4\rh4.\fnrn,MR RI r Ann PIA m} 11/97/'X119 • • e: r �() DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 —1 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 44 -< Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopmen t ' -cis E-mail:dcdaco.jefferson.wa.us CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT#: BLD12-00382 APPLICANT: QUINTEN SHAY PHONE: 206-455-9650 11031 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD ISSAQUAH WA 98027-8696 SITE ADDRESS: 110 GROVES WAY Issue Date: 02/7/2013 PORT LUDLOW, 98365 Final Date: 12/16/2014 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 3 PARCEL NUMBER: 721194012 Section: 19 Township: 27 N Range: 1E PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW ADU W/ATT GARAGE THE PROJECT LISTED ABOVE COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE BUILDING CODE 2009 EDITION. OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 5N SPRINKLER SYSTEM yes 3 THE PROJECT PASSED ITS FINAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVED FINAL SIGN OFF ON 12/16/2014 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_Occupancy.rpt 12/16/2014 CRB Engineering 90 Bishop Road,Pod Angeles,WA 98363 Engineering• FHA Foundation Certificates/ Construction Inspection (541)499-2956 E-Mail:c rb.engineering©yahoo.com 1 III (i }f As T � ',, 4 1 i i ,_xf 1, December 24, 2012 JfiFffillii CUM 9 i Iril Jefferson County Department of Community Development 1820 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Response to County Questions for Permit Number BLD12-00382, Quinten Shay,ADU Unit Dear Frank: The following is our response to the questions from the county: 1. The structural sheet, holddown schedule, has been updated to show the hexagon symbol more accurately. 2. Holddown#9 should have been holddown#4, Sheet Al now reflects this correction. 3. The winder stairs have had their narrowest point increased to 6". 4. There are no H2 connections on sheet A2,the roof consists of TJI joists that cantilever over the top plate on two walls and over the log walls on the remaining two sides. We will be using a Simpson `H16-2 at each joist to ensure the connection for uplift. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact us. Sincerely, i. ,-, i n c''''.1)(.. °I.tIt\N'IL4';t.14/6>":'-4 I*-. itL., _it 1 I i ...-:y v 7 s "p ,pe 44468 cO <a. Catherine Bailey, P.E. p\F,s,, IST ,Nc, \�w Project Engineer A-Ili-7J- CRB Engineering • 9 9 90 Bishop Road,Port Angeles,WA 98363 Engineering I FHA Foundation Certificates / Construction inspection (541)499-2956 E-Mail:crb.engineering @yahoo.com } DEC 242012 December 24, 2012 Jefferson County Department of Community Development JEFFERSON COUNEV BCD 1820 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Response to County Questions for Permit Number BLD12-00382, Quinten Shay,ADU Unit Dear Frank: The following is our response to the questions from the county: 1. The structural sheet, holddown schedule, has been updated to show the hexagon symbol more accurately. 2. Holddown#9 should have been holddown#4, Sheet Al now reflects this correction. 3. The winder stairs have had their narrowest point increased to 6". 4. There are no H2 connections on sheet A2, the roof consists of TJ1 joists that cantilever over the top plate on two walls and over the log walls on the remaining two sides. We will be using a Simpson `H16-2 at each joist to ensure the connection for uplift. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact us. Sincerely, $\NE R. 6 Q\\�i °F 'A 40 9 ice, . < 111/k/ /) ti 44468 cO Catherine Bailey, P.E. es, IST ENS'\�� Project Engineer fa- Srmiik°N C. • • JEFFERSON COUNTY 'kilo i?? DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '� 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 ,,,.4. .,06' 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax �S, NSp www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment n. Master Permit Application MLA: , � Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): ANA RPSi_cQAre-- Tax Parcel Number: /a II 91100— Property Size: (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: -------- -- r Property Owner(s)of Record. Ger i i^-4-63,-, ( L u.. Telephone:JO _ ` 970.50 _Fax: i ,�,s 6 20,9/ j e il:�;e-L:n r••, Mailing Address: '1 G roves (tic i --� 9 .Va — Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): C+wkAvac t ; + ______.1 Telephone: 1(a0— 7 75-- .SW Ll y Fax: r FERAN COUNTY emai: ', • '. 1• o.au, / ' - dJgrori;"� LOPMENT Mailing Address: "O A i S I op ,� i e)r-E _, ,.ii�i�.r rr......— What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Lot or Road Segregation puilding ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) .Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or Cl** ❑ Manufactured Home .❑ Modular • - . - ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial' ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ' ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑ Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑ Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: ,, '0 ESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate elolitgellijr 7 AILIPM to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE � __ Date: 23 S ear 201 2 By signing this appf. 1 orm,th; grnerlagent;,+ hat the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its know edge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue -•ainst Jefferson ounty as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide acce > -nd rig of entry to J;i'rson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required - - inspecti. s. Staffs -. - ,,nd right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the applicai. • he or st- wants pri. • ? +^� Signature: _ Date: 2/ SG• 1 '2's IL The action o -ctio•_ •pplicant rtake a9,-,---sult of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered •ecies and coul•4--. to a poten lel"take"of an - dangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA." -fferson County ma,- no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will n. .iolate e ESA. Any'•'idual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you ar- complian - with the J- - on County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfera• - r onsibility •r adherir . d complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this c err signs and andjate�itbelow. Signature: _ / Date: J _o} + • IP .-- BUILDER STATEMENT • The signer of this st et Int does) reby ce • hat they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assn tfie res.•dssibility• e General Contractor for the proposed project. c,��` Signature: �� Date: 21 5 E 1 `2,6 1 GENERAL ONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLERA A PFIONE: FAX: / ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Ty�p?5of Sewage Disposal: )3.. New pi,Wood Existing: 0 Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: 1.. Bank Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: 1 Height: 'individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# Bedrooms: Water Supply: L Demolition ❑ Other: Pp Y: Existing:,•--- - 0 Setback: Private well ❑ Two Party -,Type of Heat: Proposed: Z ❑ Public t0 Total: D- Name of System: • If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: - Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed • IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food'Service? Yes / No If this is a Pro•ane Tank and/or A••liance Installation •ermit mark all items below that a••I : I Underground Tank 1 Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: I Heat Stove I Cook Stove I Woodstove I Fireplace Insert 1 Hot Water TTanlL I Pellet Stove I Other' Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / o When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed F" Office Us? -Q,1tl;lr Amount . Revision Main Floor Heated " *-- ''' ' ' EH Bld App Review: Floor Heated Consistency Review: Other Heated — Base fee: . Mezzanine Additional Section: --.----•_- Heated Basement ,- Plan Check fee: CIO Unheated Basemen State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: i .%- Garage/Carport �� SUBTOTAL 1 Decks -, 911/Rd Approach fee: i OO X1 (0 —{ Other TOTAL: 97c 1 23 Receipt Number: t�I l3q 7 17 Cash/Check Number: �0 f 6 ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) (� Date: - • air ma a va ue o a a•or an.materia o Lod o n a nr /lac"-' "" _ Initials: z } 0 • CC O H 0 0 O CT LL CV _0 Z LL "`• O H O 0 F--i O CO C) a) — •f- CO -D LLJ O O — co J O O L co -0 x Cr -o � co Z= H N c U C) LLI O 0 CO \ -F+ "0 H O 07 I \ -- 7 L L .0 co ti Q -0 U C, U LLI Z O Cr 0 J Cl CL -s- ---, --.,. U I- F- 0 O Ca N CO Cn "O # 0 0 U CO Cr_ I- - 'O O 07 w Q C O 3 CC CD 3 F- J CO � o co O CO 0- J U O 2 I -0 z ¢ 1� O = � I- O H O CV -- Cr) CC � C3' O 3 N O X Q CO I- CO 2 Q CO co 0) -0 C` O co F- W CO CO] C LLl CI- J W H W C1 0) } } CO CC Q CD � ¢ CO Z ¢ o } Z 3 -- CC ,- CO LL1 X � C] Q 0 [9 CL CV CO F- 4 CC 2 F- 1` W J Z F- CO Z 0 _1 CV IC Z H W W 2 = CE >- W O F- Z Cr CC U W '0 0 ,-, 0' X W LL I O CC U Z CO F- a) J F- ,- CJ' CC - rn a Z m CC O O F- } CO CO " H O CO CO 2 O Q D 0- O O .- CO C7 I- J 2 +, • U 0' .- H CO CO - -F-, O CV O CO ›. .- O 0 O , •I•- r-- . 07 . >- . "- CC . CV 2 CO n CO 0 . 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 L CO CO 0 U N CV � a it C O ›- a) -- C_ a L Q Y C — a) O -1--. N 2 a) a) a a) -- = co L a) U CO N "0 ? CO U C_ L CZ — O CO 0- C_ C3 (o x +-I U -0 x 03 CO a CO -- -- m a) F- I- x c-i- F- CD m c4- X X F- Q • /' .:.ko • --------______---" _ ANK•• 1 .r_- C-,(1) N MI 300 1 0 ..,-- N88°42'32"W 405.8.' --..NIMICIMIIVPIWIIV, ■ X X-%•4•90:101IIIMICIMIRIMIMPTVOINIMICIII.WIlIN, AMP // el i (.. . , . ._ L -,::,; 5.;;::.7,::.i::,:•:-:- -t-:,.;.;..E:7 ::::,:. ex.2 bedroom E.,4f1.:::::',.:T:41,4t::tryzinpll■ .--..:r...,..-- , i - eLnittIattRinP ...t:.:r 3io / f 6,(\s home I 4 ;/ 1 / • drainfleld area • .,4. t rn $ , -- R50 ■ ,., refer to permit ' \ ex. well -R100 SEP90-00566 A 0 0 0 41 X ' / ".?"''' i 4 -, ,I4-.. r1,20- .basearea7-------/---L-- -- :. -:,y) . / ;:-....r.. -.L.....V..,;,. ,..1.4,,4;;;;;; ;:-?;z:-:::,'.'' -•:':,.-:!:.:. "::::."'"1V'',-''':7. ",; ;;:•,:' ...2 30 Easement -'41300( , • • • . • f\) 4 ' /, APPROVED i' 4., o• PLAN SITE . , • ., ,,,:,. FEB — 6 2013 , ,.. . ' 53' 4 6. JEF,:4:',..• CO * 44.0e , DEpt oF r., ,v .. !.... ,! ' 1:4 .4; li #, , SIGNAFU 41ri , i TV r - - - -,-. A. / / /V, ; 1 .e-:) °' A cn 00, P - . , 4 ., 7-' --- : -e fog , . -,, I---) OfElIVE(l) , . £' , ° tli ,.:.!: OS ■ "1' ' 1 ;1 I JAN 31 2013 i ' I\ JEFFERSON COUNTY $' 'sx.,:s.;;;„ - , R DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \ ---, . •1 V ,IP4 4 •-tit:*4 -..m■ \4 4 #• i . 7-------- ,-b 1i ' 114 .4 7211c14012 4 4. % \ ex.break $ . 6•0 to shoreline 1 : located @ X $ Gl...l...k.r14C.k.N3- o •. PK- 1 k 0 GI rtrYCS ifLi/".'Lk - --I•o• 1001* • --Vp PA—LUC)\OLO Lik3/1<. ef Sa-6 him MINI Oic-`-!J3 .-1111111nr $/1"---- . t -- . 1 $ /7/7//nH1 y' / ,/ / / \:\\\*\\\\\ a b co I [-..-_-). Zr ll--1 O O p V 0 La-0 O 0 O 0 1 '.. O = • 0 000 \ f W \ I.; ',2 0 1 - 3.. 2 in 0Z CID 73 o " > x z a 00 73 O Z =vDi Am __........)073 O -/ 0 0 �,� O A • m. 14 " y rn }; 0 • A. AS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE,IS THE PROPERTY OF ORB ENGINEERING AND IS NOT TO BE USED,IN WHOLE OR PART,FAR ANY OTHER,PRWT INTHOUT THE NRITTEN-AUTHORIZATION mow n CR8 D.W 0,1/28/2012 • R 310019 n ORB cot 03/28/2012 NOE 111 0 0 1 \ m RAIsron PER cawr 12rnn: CRS A, R1001101 PER G C0.1110'Y 81,7/2013 0113 A D U. RESIDENCE P - \ A RAISE BOON SIZE PER o,.7 1/31/23 CRS QUINTON SHAY • 179 CRONES WAY PORT LUDLOW,WA 98385 ' LOT 3;ENLC 8Y TAX 5; THORNDYNE SP/3 PARCEL(721 194 012; S19; 7279;RIO ._7 m 7=7. i" __ .' CJ J O -- n — 7 CD C=I C7 r 9 • r I 0 0 0 0 • 'x2'x12' DEEP SPREAD FIG (i■ DECK COLUMNS TYP (11) LOCATIONS W/(3) #4 REBAR EACH WAY. C) 0 . V 10 Afik tr I H . 0 /0 AI UNCONDITIONED STORAGE SINGLE CAR 0 1') GARAGE lir I Ank I SF i 1 Wi EA AI Vir I du 1 _ sp'xR4E'xA1D2"FTDGEEP NOP E3 I W/(5) #4 REBAI3 EACH WAY 1 -....- I D I 0 0 D 41) Alk 1 NV UNCONDITIONED Aitil STORAGE IV _...__. ./ 0 Alik 11111 Au _. _ --- -- 7_,-- law I %Ey L- - --_-__, 10.-9" D I 1---- 1X-11" •:=, c..._ 0 .‘ ,■ 1 _ CD -^ til Cti inn 11 -- g ___■ .400 AA 35-8" L El ,8, a rs, ril r 37'-1" - 4 --_--=- 1:::: A �i i ex bedroom I rS c�, 2Sti' 2000 et home .S3_ Id z i '' ►r _ •-- d Mfieltl area '� sEP90 oo 0. 'ill// tt �>u i?f eE9, s('FFr�Tlrn-�7;, �• _..:Ea_-I I. / r^ 4 1 411111111 ",4). 1;;Ili ill v■ .1111 g T 0 3 f� ' gig 1(3 C— cn f f,. re.),sera -G C, V Hil I O // t- --r C ;t� / -ecrommended rwl m <_a 100'Sefbadr From - Fs...) * n, -Top a/Sf00e v . �i .....''� squired 30• r, Oeohs:d3 Buffer '\` _ m ex.bro _ ,:t:to ehorobne located„ a f.. rr 0 100' 200f lel/ moms mow. SCALE 1"=100 FEET Aeorod ..m....00 el.__ , 1 se• •ela• - ■ •HW /'K / ,tee`"" APPROVED /7 SITE PLAN p0.8.,_2 '' Z FEB — 6 2013 0 JEFF Of C•UNTY w DEPT.OF C• fly TY ■ 'LOPMENT m SIGNATURE: 4 i� ,, i I . A NJ tn US DOCUMENT.AND iCE IDEAS AND DEMONS INCORPORATED 11EfEI•AS AN IMMINENT Cr PROFEmON&SEANCE.13�MIE R CPPATY OF CAR ENGINEERING w NV M W/2T TO RRE USED.JR RIM CR PART.FOR NW OMER PRGECT BMW IC*WIER NJ11WNZAMN OF WB D GINEERPIO ,d as qB r OSMB/101S +•F' eeww wr^`• VA err AM w CRS ENGINEERING 0 4 iF,'S'' ADU RESIDENCE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS �le a z S I ` CIVIL ENGINEERING A7 /'� _ gM110NSHAY so•OI•Rd. ,1:^0 ?\ate l J - 171 MOM WAY N .1 PORT LUMINA WA WINS Do erb.m0lneerIn0®Yehoo.•m•• . Q T 0 LOT PAR=R"ISO mh SIR R7A4 HR� •• Y 4 N .+ J . p O o r:::> aa� 2 $mT1 PP cn I R�z S O O IAA Z m* - F DD-IOO I A •T Nrr UA U N I 0 n T�1 C m m m m O C m C mm r m 4 CI 0 0 W e1 88 RI ' O ../(1) V N ty m O A p = p 1 ;..._,,.,2 a v ,:, am 0 p D C r,,,,, 0000. (------ C _ e 0 J w : : : :i ^ ; CV O ee 1i 19 0. 0 7 ea i /€ �� i I-- l` A r AAN v �� o f a A �Z m 4i 8A NZ N -iv,D AT.., -a O 0 0 Jc _/ 0 0 u 0 ■ A 4' 4 1 I THIS DOCUMENT.AND THE LEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN.AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE.IS 1HE PROPERTY OF CRB ENGINEERING AND IS NOT TO BE USED.N WHOLE DR PART.FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF CRS ENGINEERING OWN n CRB MN 03/28/2012 AM'•. emse W CRS DAM 03/28/2012 Pe FLOOR — .■. >�6'=l1- CRB ENGINEERING y.7 d 4). -5,yl'n A ( = A D U RESIDENCE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 8 T Q P LA\ CIVIL ENGINEERING $ N t I�. , 3E m 1T1 OU8ITON SHAY PM ArgMn,WA 9' Al Z ♦yn N P0:138 1 R. �O ' 1 179 GROVES WAY 12891,Rd 0 `a� A p Z PORT LUDLOW,WA 98386 G•.en ee n•i•!a O.GOM• ` •FQ N �\ • P O LOT 3:ENLG BY TAX 5:THORNDYRE SP 03 ((((''''����� ///����'''``\\�� 117 -' PARCEL 0111 191 012;519;T2M;RUE ����\\ E 0 [1 •�'� ,_ t 1 Vl b � , c „012 I JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT OE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ilik 01 Q r> iii 91 4.0 Ag ?t.,....r 111 lm 0 y H 0 ❑ II ❑ ' f vW 1 o dr 1 0 If) _._ 4, m i oa • ❑ Ag 2 8 i 00 xi E 0 e0 ({) 1 ..... ) 0 _ .. 0 D ❑ fA 058°lis: Vl) 11 W'e' yEN ni 4 mF 2ULI4 ° rit N C) -< O Aig < .t—R 2 6 �. 0 ©_- t. 0 I ❑ ■ © O Q © y N C fr ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ S,t.`DN { Q OC) C,y ills BOOSpIT.AND TIE WAS 114 KIM IERXRPORARO WON.AS AN INSTRUMENT O'PRCBE7IOIAL SERV L 7 RE PROERTY Ci CM MEMO NO IS NOT TO BE IBM.N IBIOE OR PMT.PM NIT ODER PRO.ECT ININOUT AIE*MI NIUIONZAAW CT LAB EMBED= MOM CM es 01/2011012 eer Or ON w 07/93/1012 FOUNDATION -MON -1. - CRB ENGINEERING %y� • Q�a _ ADU RESIDENCE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS T z PLAN `Mr r 0 2NION MY CIVIL ENGINEERING ven A Ne WA t Y m Pesxew ltd. 171 MOWS RAY MA. ���::J//' Ao Z PORT=M t WA 13310 * 0 - LOT s i„,„,3Y TAR 4 mOl3nn¢ erb.en Ineerin •Neo.Rom-• AKy Pmai/121 ill O1%NR rim 2 ''��''�� if ( \\\ 1 1 € ILli '.112 JEFFERSON COUNTY L`, T.OF COMM'INITYOENELORMENT Mary Blain From: Mary Blain Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:49 AM To: 'tisa @ador.com' Subject: regarding the do for sprinklers Tisa, I am responding to your inquiry with Sally Ellis regarding the sprinkler system in your ADU recently finaled for BLD12- 00382. The c/o concerns just the information that was included on the permit, not necessarily everything that is on the building site. I did not see engineered plans for a sprinkler system in the building permit application or a mark-off for an inspection of the flow system and other inspections necessary for us to approve a sprinkler system in the building file. If you would like the sprinklers permitted,you are welcome to apply for this, but it is not included in the original permit. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact our office. Best regards, Mary Blain Plans Examiner I Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 1 • • Sally Ellis From: Tisa Agloro<tisa @ador.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:37 PM To: Sally Ellis Subject: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, WA Sally, Here are our questions needing clarification for Frank Hall for the final at 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, Wa 98365. Trent from NTI went out this morning and did an inspection for the Geotech report and will be submitting it to you later today. Are you doing inspections this coming Friday or closed because of holiday? 1 - Stairwell to top floor not installed-Was previously told not required as it is unhabitable living space 2 - Smoke detector on top floor and basement to be combination smoke/co2 detector- told that co2 detectors were only required directly outside bedroom. The only bedroom is on the main floor and it has a smoke/co2 detector installed directly outside and above bedroom door. 3 - Guard rail at top level required-Not required as it is unhabitable living space - if it was accessible then we were told we would need to put up railing. 4 -Water not turned on- we have passed all plumbing inspections. We travel frequently out of country for work and cannot leave water in pipes as it is not being heated when we aren't living in it. Does this absolutely need to be on for final? Thanks, Tisa . A - /1-So 1) .610 red e- t b D he„ -e,0,2,1- s op 6x1 63 6_ owe -49 .1-14 X12-' 322 • • • Sally Ellis From: Tisa Agloro<tisa @ador.com> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:50 AM M LA I Z_- To: Sally Ellis Subject: Fwd: Re: Conditions &Corrections notice for BLD12-00382 Attachments: Stormwater construction.pdf; image001.png >From: "Tisa Agloro" <tisa@ador.com> > Date: Nov 24, 2014 12:11 AM > Subject: Re: Conditions & Corrections notice for BLD12-00382 >> Sally&Trent, >> I attached the letter written from Catherine Bailey, our private engineer, who previously worked with your company. She recently inspected the drywell and stormwater facilities. Trent, can you write the letter without actually going out to the site given Catherine's letter and visual assessment? Could we send in pictures of the site to save time and cost? >Please give me a call first thing in the morning so we can get this condition resolved asap. >>Thanks, Tisa Agloro >> 360-701-7056 >> On Wed,Nov 19, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Sally Ellis <SEllis @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: >>> >>> Good morning >>> >>>Attached is a copy of your building permit for the New ADU with attached Garage >>> >>>As we discussed on the phone, please see page 4 of this permit Conditions before Final #1 & 2. >>> >>>We must receive these documents before we can give you a final. >>> >>> >>> > >> I also attached the Correction Notice from Frank Hall for yesterday's inspection. >>> >>> >>> >>> If you have any questions please feel free to contact either myself or Frank Hall >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Thank you 1 • • • >>> >>> >>> >>> >» Sally L Ellis >>> >>>Jefferson County Community Development >>> >>>Permit Technician >>> >>>621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend, WA 98368 >>> >>>Mon-Thurs 9am- 4:30pm, closed from 12-1 >>> >>>Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 >>> >>> sellis@co.jefferson.wa.us >>> >>>http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2 • • Sally Ellis From: Sally Ellis Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'Tisa Agloro' Subject: RE: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, WA Dear Tisa Per Frank Hall there is no way to not have a hand rail and or stairs to this space! I am sorry but you must do as Frank instructed. Thank you Sally Ellis Permit Tec Jefferson County DCD 360-379-4452 From:Tisa Agloro [mailto:tisa @ador.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:23 AM To:Sally Ellis Subject: Re: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow,WA Sally, Can you cancel the request for the inspection that I called in. We will need to work on a few more things given Frank's answers. Could you ask him one additional question for us. If we seal the attic except for the access by a stair access inside the attic with no access along the ledge, could we then be exempt from the railing? There would be no access to that section if the walls were completely sealed. He will understand after seeing the home. Thanks, Tisa On Tue,Nov 25, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Sally Ellis <SEllis @co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: Dear Tisa Below are the answer to your questions, I tired to call you to give you this information but was unable to leave a voicemail as your voice mailbox is full. Thank you Sally L Ellis Jefferson County Community Development Permit Technician 1 • III Ill 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend,WA 98368 Mon-Thurs gam-4:30pm, closed from 12-1 Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 sellis@co.jefferson.wa.us http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us _er ,.„, 4:„...„.„ ,,t„,,,,.,,,, From:Tisa Agloro [mailto:tisa@ador.com] Sent:Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:37 PM To:Sally Ellis Subject:Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow,WA Sally, Here are our questions needing clarification for Frank Hall for the final at 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, Wa 98365. Trent from NTI went out this morning and did an inspection for the Geotech report and will be submitting it to you later today. Are you doing inspections this coming Friday or closed because of holiday? 1 - Stairwell to top floor not installed - Was previously told not required as it is unhabitable living space A stairwell to the top floor is required for this permit as,you have more then 450sq ft of space 2 • 2 - Smoke detector on top floor and basement to be combination smoke/co2 detector-told that co2 detectors were only required directly outside bedroom. The only bedroom is on the main floor and it has a smoke/co2 detector installed directly outside and above bedroom door. A Co@ detector is required for ever floor 3 - Guard rail at top level required- Not required as it is unhabitable living space- if it was accessible then we were told we would need to put up railing. Guard rail is required because of the stairwell requirement 4 -Water not turned on- we have passed all plumbing inspections. We travel frequently out of country for work and cannot leave water in pipes as it is not being heated when we aren't living in it. Does this absolutely need to be on for final? Sorry but the water and the hot water tank must be one so they can be checked to ensure they are working at final. Also as discussed with you earlier-Someone must be present on site for the Final inspection. I do hope this answers your questions. Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions or need more information. Thanks, Tisa 3 • • Sally Ellis From: Sally Ellis Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:27 AM To: 'Tisa Agloro' Subject: RE: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, WA He said no exemption, he must have the hand rail From:Tisa Agloro [mailto:tisa @ador.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:26 AM To:Sally Ellis Subject: Re: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow,WA I think my question was misunderstood. If we add stairs to give access and block off the entrance from the front, there would seem to be no need for a handrail as there is no access to that area...it would be blocked off except for stair access going directly inside the attic. On Wed,Nov 26, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Sally Ellis<SEllis(aco.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Dear Tisa Per Frank Hall there is no way to not have a hand rail and or stairs to this space! I am sorry but you must do as Frank instructed. Thank you Sally Ellis Permit Tec Jefferson County DCD 360-379-4452 From Tisa Agloro [mailto:tisa @ador.com] Sent:Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:23 AM To:Sally Ellis Subject: Re: Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow,WA 1 • 10 Sally, Can you cancel the request for the inspection that I called in. We will need to work on a few more things given Frank's answers. Could you ask him one additional question for us. If we seal the attic except for the access by a stair access inside the attic with no access along the ledge, could we then be exempt from the railing? There would be no access to that section if the walls were completely sealed. He will understand after seeing the home. Thanks, Tisa On Tue,Nov 25, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Sally Ellis <SEllis@co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: Dear Tisa Below are the answer to your questions, I tired to call you to give you this information but was unable to leave a voicemail as your voice mailbox is full. Thank you Sally L Ellis Jefferson County Community Development Permit Technician 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend,WA 98368 Mon-Thurs gam-4:30pm, closed from 12-1 Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 sellis@co.jefferson.wa.us http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us ,r ,, .4, ,, 2 S From Tisa Agloro [mailto:tisa@ador.com] Sent:Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:37 PM To:Sally Ellis Subject:Questions for Frank- 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, WA Sally, Here are our questions needing clarification for Frank Hall for the final at 110 Groves Way Port Ludlow, Wa 98365. Trent from NTI went out this morning and did an inspection for the Geotech report and will be submitting it to you later today. Are you doing inspections this coming Friday or closed because of holiday? 1 - Stairwell to top floor not installed-Was previously told not required as it is unhabitable living space A stairwell to the top floor is required for this permit as you have more then 450sq ft of space 2 - Smoke detector on top floor and basement to be combination smoke/co2 detector- told that cot detectors were only required directly outside bedroom. The only bedroom is on the main floor and it has a smoke/co2 detector installed directly outside and above bedroom door. A Co@ detector is required for ever floor 3 - Guard rail at top level required -Not required as it is unhabitable living space - if it was accessible then we were told we would need to put up railing. Guard rail is required because of the stairwell requirement 4 -Water not turned on- we have passed all plumbing inspections. We travel frequently out of country for work and cannot leave water in pipes as it is not being heated when we aren't living in it Does this absolutely need to be on for final? Sorry but the water and the hot water tank must be one so they can be checked to ensure they are working at final. 3 s • • Also as discussed with you earlier-Someone must be present on site for the Final inspection. I do hope this answers your questions. Feel free to contact me if you have any other questions or need more information. Thanks, Tisa 4 S • CATHERINE R., BAILEY Commercial&Residential Engineer (360)775-5444 CRBengineering,net info@CRBengineering,net ENGINEERING, 11,C Specializing in Structural Analysis,FHA Foundation Certs,Energy Caks,JARPA Permit Writing,Inspections,and More CBiii lg.40.14Atvi, licensed in WA(44468),OR(63343PE)and CA(70420) November 23, 2014 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 1820 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Stormwater Facility Construction for Permit Number BLD12-00382, Quinten SIa\yN,EARD. Uz Unit To Whom it May Concern: I have observed the drywells and stormwater Facility Construction for the above amed permit. All portions of this facility were built in conformance with the stormwater plan da March 12, 2012. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact us. Sincerely, 'Qr wAs 14,,,,, t l it , c. ik 110 , le -6 43 P4468S cks cisT0/- \-4, Catherine Bailey, P.E. es, i s) c0‘ Project Engineer ioNAL 1 11-J3-11/ , • • Sally Ellis From: Tisa Agloro<tisa @ador.com> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 12:12 AM To: Sally Ellis Subject: Re: Conditions &Corrections notice for BLD12-00382 Attachments: Stormwater construction.pdf Sally, I attached the letter from Catherine Bailey as she was our engineer and inspected the drywells and stormwater facilities. We had another engineer out a few months ago that inspected the septic system. Can Trent write the letter without actually going out to the site? Or does he need to visually see it? Could we send in pictures of the site? I'm currently on a business trip. Could I sign the document any other way as I have no way of printing and signing it? Please give me a call or have Trent call first thing in the morning as he said he could be out Monday morning. Thanks, Tisa 360-701-7056 PRIOR TQ FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY.PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED APR`L 3 2012'STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILI TIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GECTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN, LETTER FROM CATHERINE R.BAILEY.PE STATING THAT THE STORMWATEI Ft C:LITY HAS BEEN,CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE~a1 ORMWATER PLAN DATED MARCH 5,2012 AS SIGNED';BY CATHERINE R. BAILEY,PF. On Wed,Nov 19, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Sally Ellis <SEllis(a,co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Attached is a copy of your building permit for the New ADU with attached Garage As we discussed on the phone, please see page 4 of this permit Conditions before Final #1 &2. We must receive these documents before we can give you a final. I also attached the Correction Notice from Frank Hall for yesterday's inspection. If you have any questions please feel free to contact either myself or Frank Hall 1 • 0 Thank you fr % Sally L Ellis Jefferson County Community Development Permit Technician 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend,WA 98368 Mon-Thurs 9am - 4:30pm, closed from 12-1 Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 sellisftco.jefferson.wa.us http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us 2 • NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. L717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 , Engineers "Land Surveyors Geologists Construction Inspection Materials Testing Phone:(360)4524491 E-Mail:infoCa.nti4u.com NTl November 25, 2014 Mr. Quinten Shay 11031 Renton Issaquah Road Issaquah, WA 98027 Subject: Geotechnical Inspection of the New Residential Development at 179 Groves Way; Port Ludlow,WA 98365.Jefferson County TPN: 721194012. Permit Number BLD12-00382 Dear Mr. Shay and Others Concerned, On November 25, 2014,Trent Adams, EIT, of NTI conducted an inspection of a new single family residence related to Jefferson County Building Permit Number BLD12-00382 at the above- mentioned address. The purpose of the inspection was to verify that the structure and facilities have been constructed in conformance with the NTI Geotechnical Report dated April 3, 2012. A new, roughly 2,500 square foot residence with two drywells was observed at the property. The position of the residence meets the 100 foot structural setback that was recommended by NTI. A 30 foot wide undisturbed vegetated buffer measured from the top of the slope was also recommended by NTI. Observation of the property showed that a 30 foot wide undisturbed vegetated buffer has been provided by the owner(s). In February of 2013, NTI was asked by Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) to provide a geotechnical review of the stormwater plan prepared by Catherine R. Bailey, PE, proposing the use of drywells for the development. NTI provided a response letter, dated February 5, 2013, to Jefferson County DCD, approving the proposed drywells for stormwater management at the site. The constructed drywells meet the NTI recommendations for implementing a permanent stormwater management system at the site. It is in our opinion that the new residence and drywell construction meet the geotechnical recommendations provided by Nil. Please feel free to contact the undersigned engineers if you have any questions or need additional assistance. • 0 NTI Engineering and Land Surveying Sincerely, s S. co) . v-•—' /1/I- , y.. .. - ' %"falgrawi ONALVt's ° ,. , -------/ Steve S. Luxton MSc, PE Trent T.Adams BSCE, Eli Senior Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Projects Manager 2 • • PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM CATHERINE R. BAILEY, PE STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMWATER PLAN DATED MARCH 5, 2012 AS SIGNED BY CATHERINE R. BAILEY, PE. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED APRIL 3, 2012 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED APRIL 3, 2012 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 1 ; y y : s. Al. • I-. ■ ' ' �, M w b � .N ti o " z IV ,1� C o --r1 O a O ri , D \\/ //, `. , V -0 Q //A!�, .t 4.11 t 111'4( ) O (/) (n r' // ll '.1 rrl 'I Z c :13 CCI 0 C ti CJ c z Z o b j// /It;° 111� '; CO C •ki) 4 .: • ••9 D .,. , 1. --z) N.. ... .... f_,--1-1 -< -< % W.:, 101,Is- 4,4....;f..'....-.O j • �:/ � • .. . s r N ;\ , ' k :. \ \, ° � ,• .._) , ,4 • • C) W.: Iteir. 41.1.z, ',..• ." r . °.. / '`sAI :i '0, , (`) ,. . (- \ , ...1104.";. •: c.) , I -) ~O � , , ��m °' l0� c � h j et 0 ° 01 F.13 0 0 —1 a O � / 0.0.01 rh -•r r-- b \/R' •® •• I -j) N,LI c' m 3 O m C 1 CD I UOU THIS DOCUMENT.AND THE KIEAS ._._. _• N.AS AN INSTRUMENT O PROFESSIONAL Sp2 M.IS THE PROPESTY OF ERB ENCNEERIN:AND IS NOT TO BE U .IN NHOLE DR PART.FOR ANY OTHER PRO, CT%MOUT THE IMETIEN AUTHCRIZ(1110N QF CRB ENGINEERING —— �_ (n MOS SY CRB MU 05/OS/2012 CRS ENGINEERING ' mom N.arm mama ow STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS `r .' IT, DRYWELL -•-• O• n ADU RESIDENCE "����`((((��,'�� CIVIL ENGINEERING CARMEN SHAY p z DETAILS 170 GROVES WAWA80J06 on 6l nav na.n" �� 9. '`I P Lot J;ENO.BY TAX 0:ThORNDtI�SP p Ph 1310)1754444 ,jy `r/•' N R•.w SS•yisNr PARCEL/721 194 012;814,1275;R1E • crb.engineerIng. yahoo.com • �. i BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION NOTICE Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 PERMIT#: BLD12-00382 SITE ADDRESS: 110 GROVES WAY Date Issued: 2/7/2013 PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365 Date Expires: 2/7/2014 APPLICANT: QUINTEN SHAY 11031 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD ISSAQUAH WA 98027-8696 SUBDIVISION: THORNDYKE BAY SHORT PLAT#3 BLOCK: LOTS: 3 PARCEL: 721194012 Section: 19 Township: 27N Range: 01 E According to our records, YOUR BUILDING PERMIT HAS NOT PASSED A FINAL INSPECTION AND WILL EXPIRE ON 2/7/2014. To keep your building permit active you must pay a $228 renewal fee. This will keep your permit active for one year after the date of expiration. If renewal fee is not paid by time of expiration, no more inspections can be performed until received. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Permit Technician \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_Perm it_Exp_Ntc.rpt • 4SON co JEFFERSON COUNTY • ° DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.usicommunitvdevelopment r�gsl Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd(a)co.jefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections(Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning Watershed Stewardship Resource Center April 2, 2013 RE: Building Permit No. BLD 1 Z — p,Z Dear Permit Holder, It has come to our attention that your building permit No. BLD 1.Z_— 3 v2 was issued on Z i /( . As you may know, on December 3, 2012, the County Board of Commissioners adopted the 2009 International Residential and Building Codes and established new time limits, per Ordinance No. 12-1203-12. Pursuant to this Ordinance, as of January 1, 2013, if your permit is less than five years old, additional renewals may be approved. Any permits older than five years must have their work finalized by our inspectors by Dec. 31St, 2013, or your permit will be cancelled (further extensions may be granted by the building official). Having your building receive and pass all of its required inspections is valuable to you as it is your assurance that your building meets adopted standards for quality and safety. Additionally, having documentation that your building has passed required inspections may be required from lenders or buyers if you ever decide to sell or re-finance your building. This is the only notice you will receive. In the event that your building permit is cancelled and your construction is not finalized by the building inspectors, the County may choose to record a "Notice to Title" on the property, to document the property is out of compliance with the County's development codes. If you have any questions about the renewal of you building permit, you may call our office at (360) 379-4450. We look forward to assisting you in completing your building inspections. Sincerely, Carl Smith, Director • • BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRATION NOTICE Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 PERMIT#: BLD12-00382 SITE ADDRESS: 110 GROVES WAY Date Issued: 2/7/2013 PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365 Date Expires: 2/7/2014 APPLICANT: QUINTEN SHAY 11031 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD ISSAQUAH WA 98027-8696 SUBDIVISION: THORNDYKE BAY SHORT PLAT#3 BLOCK: LOTS: 3 PARCEL: 721194012 Section: 19 Township: 27N Range: 01 E According to our records, YOUR BUILDING PERMIT HAS NOT PASSED A FINAL INSPECTION AND WILL EXPIRE ON 2/7/2014. To keep your building permit active you must pay a $228 renewal fee. This will keep your permit active for one year after the date of expiration. If renewal fee is not paid by time of expiration, no more inspections can be performed until received. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Permit Technician \\tidemark\data\forms\F_B LD_Perm it_Exp_Ntc.rpt t. a GEOTECHNICAL SITE REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS ,F. L d,. - f1 GaF Prepared For Quinten Shay April 3, 2012 For the Property Described As Parcel Number 721194012 Section 19,Township 27 North, Range 1 East, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington � I o1 v Prepared by D' ?,1, Harriet S. Cornachione, MSc, LG Robert A. Leach, PE - JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NTI ENGINEERING &SURVEYING, INC. 717 S. Peabody Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Phone 360.452.8491 Fax 360.452.8498 Web Site www.nti4u.com E-mail info @nti4u.com 1 I Z WI GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW & SITE RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared For Quinten Shay April 3, 2012 For the Property Described As Parcel Number 721194012 Section 19,Township 27 North, Range 1 East, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington Prepared By NTI ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING of W h,'�, yip, A. ,,..4,,,,,,,. s „iii 1 0 "0"., ,s',,. 'A I f C'' e<4'() 4' '/ 0 s l 4.c.9,70<japii_.\\141^ / 1 1 #r , , ; t_. '31" :.-.75— 1 , /viz 4;1-7-Issr; I 4 I,,' ii.X- ;.'.' ' i.:' x'c, .may/ /3772 /lSed Gee• .fit 31'c2-- 0,(1,_ .'081Ez° c�'. . - sioNAL.0- 4(3`fa- Harriet S. Cornactione _ Harriet S.Cornachione, MSc, LG Robert A. Leach, MBA, PE Project Geologist Principal Engineer 2 1.0 Introduction A geotechnical site review has been completed at the above referenced property,at the request of the property owner to identify any specific geologic or geotechnical concerns and to provide appropriate guidelines and recommendations for site development. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The site is covered by the Critical Area and Shoreline regulations of Jefferson County Code Section 18.22 and 18.25, respectively. The shoreline is classified as "conservancy"and the parcel has been identified with areas of landslide hazard, shoreline stability and erosion hazard in the Jefferson County GIS.The parcel is zoned Rural Residential 1:5. The scope of the investigation included a geotechnical site reconnaissance field investigation, performed on February 24, 2012, review of the septic test pit exposures and soil logs,and research and review of available public records of neighboring parcels,the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas, U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Maps and geologic mapping of the area through Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2.0 Site Description The parcel is located on Groves Way Road,east of Thorndyke Road, and can be accessed off of Highway 104 via South Point Road. The parcel (see Figure 1) is an irregularly shaped, long narrow lot extending approximately 1400 feet in length north—south, and ranging in width from approximately 90 feet to 300 feet east—west. It has been developed with an existing 2-bedroom home located north of Groves Way. The remainder of the property is undeveloped, moderately to heavily forested and generally well vegetated with trees and abundant understory. Figure 1. Parcel location map showing topographic contours at 10 foot intervals.(Source:Jefferson County GIS) The northern portion of the undeveloped property slopes gently to the southeast at approximately 7—10%. The southern half of the parcel is a steep bluff sloping to the Hood Canal shoreline, ranging from slopes of 50%to approximately 90%. The steep bluff to the south ranges in elevation from sea level to approximately 300 feet at the top of slope to the north. Significant slope breaks occur along the bluff at approximately 80—100 feet, 140—150 feet and 200—240 feet,where slopes flatten to approximately 20%—45%. A narrow winding foot path provides beach access across the bluff face. 3 r � Trees located in the northern property, in the vicinity of the proposed development are generally in good condition, vertical and healthy(see Figure 2). No visible evidence of soil movement or slope instability was observed in this area of the property. a Figure 2. Site photograph looking south,showing typical vertical stature of trees in vicinity of septic test pit. Slopes to the south contain abundant alder trees,which can often be found in areas of slope instability(see Figure 3). Generally these trees exhibit good vertical trunks,with some areas of jackstrawed development. Understory is less well developed along the bluff areas,with some soil and rock exposures along the steeper slopes. Figure 3. View along bluff slope showing typical vegetation in upper bench vicinity. 3.0 Site Geology&Soils The site contains bedrock geologic units deposited during Pleistocene glaciation episodes. The upper 2/3 of the parcel is mapped as Vashon Till,commonly referred to as Lodgemont Till.This unit typically consists of a largely 4 ) t unstratified mix of clay,silt,sand and gravels deposited by glaciers during the Vashon stade. Within the property this unit is mapped,and was observed.on site in exposures along the upper slopes to the south,generally above approximately 100 feet in relief. The tll overlies stratified sediments mapped as pre-Vashon in age(Geologic Map of East Jefferson County). Till unit(hardpan)was encountered in Soil Test Pit#1 at a depth of 57 inches. Figure 4 (below)shows an exposure of the stratified sediments below the till unit. 1 Al r s-= . F-'r Figure 4. View along bluff slope showing section of stratified sediments,alternating silts and gravel layers. As mapped by the National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)site soils are identified primarily as Alderwood gravelly,sandy loam. This soil is typically formed on terraces overlying basal till geologic units and may contain some volcanic ash in the upper portion of the unit. Depth to water table or restrictive layer is generally about 36 inches,and soils are typically moderately well drained and lack tendency for flooding or ponding. Alderwood soils cover the entire area of the proposed development. This unit is rated as"somewhat limited"for dwellings without basements and "slight" erosion hazard by the NRCS(see Appendix). The lower(southern) parcel soils are mapped as rough broken land,and are typically gravelly sandy loam to stratified extremely gravelly sandy loam,excessively drained. Below this unit coastal beaches. form the soil unit. Both of these soil units are rated as"very severe"erosion hazard. The rough broken land sols are rated as"very limited"for dwellings without basements. 4.0 Geo-hazard Assessment 4.1 Landslide Hazard Based on the site observations, and literature review, landslide hazard is limited to the bluff slope, below the 300 foot topographic contour as shown in the site vicinity map in the Appendix. The only area of moderately recent landslides observed on the site is along the beach area where there exist some exposed soil slumps. The slope breaks(benches)along the bluff appear to be formed by old rotational slumps. These slumps can be seen on LIDAR (see Figure 5)as scalloped or curvilinear shadowed features along the bluff face oriented southwest-northeast. Offsets appear to be approximately 20 to 40 feet in the horizontal component and occur in the stratified sediments below the till layer. Differential permeability rates contribute to the destabilization of these strata and can lead to development of slip planes along the less permeable,finer layers. 5 ( -444 it r } rattp Figure 5. LIDAR image of subject parcel showing rotational slumping along bluff.(Source: Jefferson County GIS) 4.2 Erosion Hazard Erosion hazard is limited to the lowermost, southern portion of the site,where the soils are loose, non-cohesive and excessively drained, prone to water and wind action. Typically this hazard extends from the shoreline, includes the beach sediments,to the break in slope at about 150 feet above mean sea level,approximately 400 feet northward from the shoreline (see Appendix). 5.0 Recommendations 5.1 Site Development Recommendations • For geologic hazard mitigation,a standard buffer distance of 30 feet, measured from top of slope(per 18.22.170(6)(a)Jefferson County Code) is recommended at this site. Buffer is to be permanently marked with a physical separation marker such as logs or large timber placed end to end,or fencing or other approved prominent marker. Temporary signage with the following statement`landslide Hazard Area and Buffer—Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Natural Vegetation" is to be displayed during construction. Buffer area must be retained in native vegetative state in perpetuity. • For safety of the proposed structures,a minimum prudent building setback of 100 feet from top of slope is recommended for all building structures. Setback recommendation is equivalent to a vertical height of bluff as measured at the maximum distance to uppermost bench level along bluff,and consistent with standard practice and county requirements. Additional setback is recommended if feasible, in recognition of potential loss of value to the developed property where shoreline landslides have encroached on development in other regional shoreline areas. • To prevent increased discharge of stormwater to the bluff or to adjacent properties,surface runoff from hard surfaces should be routed away from such areas via careful grading practices to swales or low areas,away from the bluff,and use of low impact measures such as permeable pavement, pavement and bioswales(where appropriate), rain garden or other bio-retention area and use of splash blocks with quarry spall for dispersion 6 r � • or in conjunction with contoured slopes directing sheet flow away from the bluff to bioswales, rain garden or other infiltration measure located upslope of bluff is recommended. • Avoid underground lawn irrigation systems and unnecessary below-ground water pipes that may break and lead to the uncontrolled flow of water to the soil and bluff. Keep irrigation to a minimum in all areas of the site, and avoid discharge of storm water to the bluff slope. For further information please review the publication published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE)entitled: "Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using Vegetation". This publication can also be viewed on the DOE website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/sea.html under the 1993 and 1994 year heading.The DOE website also contains additional useful information regarding slope stability and site development, and this reference is highly recommended. 5.2 Erosion Control Measures During Construction • Clearing limits should be clearly marked during construction, along with demarcation of landslide buffer zone. • Best management practices(BMP's)as delineated in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington-Volume II shall be installed throughout this project to prevent silt and sediment from entering downstream waters or discharging to neighboring parcels. • BMP's shall also be installed to prevent tracking of sediment materials on to public roadways. • The following site specific BMP's are recommended. A more detailed description of the BMP's listed below can be found in the Appendix II of this document. These BMP's are intended to be utilized as needed. 1. BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation 2. BMP C102: Buffer Zones 3. BMP C123: Plastic Covering 4. BMP C150: Materials On Hand 5. BMP C151: Concrete Handling 6. BMP C153: Material Delivery,Storage and Containment 7. BMP C180: Small Project Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 8. BMP C233: Silt Fence 9. BMP C235: Straw Wattles • All construction will adhere to existing Jefferson County Codes.Contractor shall coordinate with engineer to implement an adequate drainage and erosion control plan during the length of this project. 6.0 Limitations and Exclusions This study and the contents of this report have been completed for use by Mr.Quinten Shay in obtaining necessary permits and for guidance in prudent development of the subject parcel.This investigation was limited to surface investigation and observations of the site and relevant literature review. The limited study was done without the benefit of deep borings,thorough subsurface or regional study or careful measurements taken over time. Setback recommendations of this report are based upon the fundamental assumption that the future of this slope will resemble its past as discerned from the geomorphology and the erosional mechanism(s)of the slopes.The recommended setback may prove insufficient in the very large, but infrequent,earthquakes that have been 7 1 T suggested by B.Atwater and others. Users of this report are encouraged to provide as much setback as possible for improved peace of mind and safety. The conclusions and recommendations of this report are not transferable to the adjoining or nearby properties. This report,the field work and the recommendations herein were conscientiously completed in accordance with the principles of geological and geotechnical science and in conformance with the professional practice of engineering. NTl provides no other warranty, neither express nor written, herewith. Users who require a level of reliance beyond the observations and recommendations of this limited study are encouraged to obtain more detailed geotechnical and geologic studies. 8 t I Y APPENDIX I Site Map Soil Report — Dwellings Without Basements Soil Report — Erosion Hazard 9 I / / / ± ±690'to shor--line !� �� t N88 4232"W ■i5:6' s0' p ± ex.2 BR home p � � x ... j —R50 drainfield area yl ex.well refer to perm , SEP90-00 .6 ;: . / R100 :'.S i P M 4 f 0 . Proposed Access 0 -; N 0110 - 0- PA Propos-• •RU, I - s. 2BR Recommended 100' Setback from Top of Slope Proposed septic Required 30' !.' Geohazard Buffer ex.break .................................... fg 0'10 shoreline located @X:••'• ..... .......... . ........................... 0' .�- .o' Ai‘ 1. ify,:a /I .7- 0 JO 60 SCALE IN FEET SM. REVISION GATE BY CHECKED 0 NORTMKSIERN 7ERRIORIEA INC.2012 DESIGNED,-. 60' I DATE: o4�.0"2 SITE PLAN W/ GEOHAZARD BUFFER & SETBACK ots6cNEO BT, S N.Q M C. 4^- NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. DRAWN BY: S. M.&M c PARCEL 721 194012 — NEW DEVELOPMENT CHECKED: CIL EIl9:,een-Lend Stovers-Geologies RENEW. EMIR. .CONST. FOR: OUINTEN SHAY �1l c«,suaclibn 10tpeclioR-Moieties resting SHEET 1 or 1 SCC 19(127N - RIE ) N TI 117 Scab!NABODY.PAN NattS.uSNICIN M1R.(760)157-0191 E T ( Dwellings Without Basements—Jefferson County Area,Washington (Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow) N N O O ."3 V 520640 520720 520800 520880 520960 521040 8. �. 47°45 2" r 00 - m m N s N N 0 � o N O O � Ol N N v O - - O ?..; ap N N N W p� N - N o O N m N N Y N , ,71 N N N 0 0 N N o Oa V R N N0 N 4T 48'41° _.. _. 47°48'41" 520640 520720 520800 520880 520960 521040 Jo Map Scale:13,130 if prrt�ted on A s¢e(8.5"x 11")sheet. ° Meters o 30 60 120 180 /j\V Feet 0 100 200 400 600 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 t 7 Dwellings Without Basements—Jefferson County Area,Washington (Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) Map Scale:1:3,140 if printed on A size(8.5"rr 11")sheet. U Area of Interest(AOI) The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. soils Soil Map Units Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Ratings Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Very limited misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Q Somewhat limited soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. EI Not limited Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Not rated or not available measurements. Political Features Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service 0 Cities Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 10N NAD83 Water Features Streams and Canals This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s)listed below. Transportation ±++ Rails Soil Survey Area: Jefferson County Area,Washington Survey Area Data: Version 7,Sep 22,2009 rV Interstate Highways Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 7/21/2006 US Routes The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Major Roads compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Local Roads imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5 Dwellings Without Basements—Jefferson County Area,Washington Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow Dwellings Without Basements Dwellings Without Basements—Summary by Map Unit—Jefferson County Area,Washington(WA631) Map unit Map unit name Rating Component name Rating reasons Acres in Percent of A01; symbol (percent) (numeric values) AOi AIC Alderwood gravelly Somewhat limited Alderwood(100%) Depth to saturated 14.7 59.7% sandy loam,0 to zone(0.10) 15 percent slopes Slope(0.00) Co Coastal beaches Not rated Beaches(100%) 2.1 8.6% Ro Rough broken land Very limited Rough broken land Too steep(1.00) 6.4 25.8% (100%) Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 23.2 94.1% Totals for Area of Interest 24.6 100.0% Dwellings Without Basements—Summary by Rating Value Rating Acres in A01 - Percent of AOI Somewhat limited 14.7 59.7% Very limited 6.4 25.8% Null or Not Rated 2.1 8.6% Totals for Area of Interest 24.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 313W2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Dwellings Without Basements—Jefferson County Area,Washington Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow it Description Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings without basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration,whichever is deeper. The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility(shrink-swell potential),and compressibility.Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification of the soil. The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water table,ponding,flooding,slope,depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited"indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected."Very limited"indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use.The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures.Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use(1.00)and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen.An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit.The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit.The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit.The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Dwellings Without Basements-Jefferson County Area,Washington Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 _I Erosion Hazard(Off-Road,Off-Trail)--Jefferson County Area,Washington (Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow) O V N N O N N N 520640 520720 520800 520880 520960 521040 47°49'3" -- fit o° o °o N fl N W b $ W N b N � j . k V ;:• h OV m m rd N b m n O _'. 0 N N b b O m b 0 b N N N N b b 00 O O m b a, W N b • 4 N O b h b c.9 Of b V O Y b ` ¢ b Ol W h N 47°48'41" ... - .. 47°48'41" 520640 520720 520800 520880 520960 521040 N _ Map Scale:1:3,200 if prated on A size(8.5"x 11")sheet. "' 0 v Meters v 0 30 60 120 180 r IANFeet /V 0 100 200 400 600 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Erosion Hazard(Off-Road,Off-Trail)—Jefferson County Area,Washington (Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOl) Map Scale:1:3,200 if printed on A size(8.5"■11")sheet I_E_ Area of Interest(AOl) The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:20,000. Soils _JI soil Map Units Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Ratings Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause very severe misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Severe soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Ei Moderate Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Slight measurements. Not rated or not available Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Political Features Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 10N NAD83 ® Cities This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Water Features the version date(s)listed below. ,..,- Streams and Canals Soil Survey Area: Jefferson County Area,Washington Transportation Survey Area Data: Version 7,Sep 22,2009 Rats Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 7/21/2006 ov Interstate Highways The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Us Routes compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Major Roads imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident N Local Roads Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 • Erosion Hazard(Off-Road,Off-Trail)–Jefferson County Area,Washington Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) Erosion Hazard(Off-Road,Off-Trail)—Summary by Map Unit-:Jefferson County (WA631) Map unit ..Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons(numeric values) Acres in ' Percent'of symbol " " name(percent) -: A01 AOI <- AIC Alderwood Slight Alderwood(100%) 17.3 58.9% gravelly sandy loam,0 to 15 percent slopes Co Coastal beaches Very Beaches(100%) Not rated(1.00) 2.5 8.4% Severe Ro Rough broken Very severe Rough broken Slope/erodibility(0.95) 7.4 25.3% land land(100%) Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 27.2 92.5% Totals for Area of Interest 29.4 100.0% Erosion.Hazard(Off-Road,Off—Trail)—Summary by Rating Value Rating Acres in A01 - Percent of AOl Slight 17.3 58.9% Very severe 9.9 33.6% Very Severe 9.9 33.6% Totals for Area of Interest 29.4 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 • Erosion Hazard(Off-Road,Off-Trail)—Jefferson County Area,Washington Shay Property_179 Groves Way,Port Ludlow Description The ratings in this interpretation indicate the hazard of soil loss from off-road and off-trail areas after disturbance activities that expose the soil surface. The ratings 9 are based on slope and soil erosion factor K.The soil loss is caused by sheet or rill erosion in off-road or off-trail areas where 50 to 75 percent of the surface p has been exposed by logging, grazing, mining, or other kinds of disturbance. The ratings are both verbal i g erbal and numerical. The hazard is described as"slight," 9 "moderate,""severe,"or"very severe."A rating of"slight" indicates that erosion is unlikely under ordinary climatic conditions;"moderate"indicates that some erosion is likely and that erosion-control measures may be needed; "severe"indicates that erosion is very likely and that erosion-control measures, including revegetation of bare areas, are advised; and"very severe"indicates that significant erosion is expected,loss of soil productivity and off-site damage are likely,and erosion-control measures are costly and generally impractical. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the specified aspect of forestland management(1.00)and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen.An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map.unit.The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. 9 P gp Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating, can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition . Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher LSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/30/2012 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX II Selected BMP's 10 4.1 Source Control BMPs BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation Purpose The purpose of preserving natural vegetation is to reduce erosion wherever practicable. Limiting site disturbance is the single most effective method for reducing erosion. For example, conifers can hold up to about 50 percent of all rain that falls during a storm. Up to 20-30 percent of this rain may never reach the ground but is taken up by the tree or evaporates. Another benefit is that the rain held in the tree can be released slowly to the ground after the storm. Conditions of Use • Natural vegetation should be preserved on steep slopes,near perennial and intermittent watercourses or swales, and on building sites in wooded areas. • As required by local governments. Design and Natural vegetation can be preserved in natural clumps or as individual Installation trees, shrubs and vines. Specifications The preservation of individual plants is more difficult because heavy equipment is generally used to remove unwanted vegetation. The points to remember when attempting to save individual plants are: • Is the plant worth saving? Consider the location, species,size,age, vigor,and the work involved. Local governments may also have ordinances to save natural vegetation and trees. • Fence or clearly mark areas around trees that are to be saved. It is preferable to keep ground disturbance away from the trees at least as far out as the dripline. Plants need protection from three kinds of injuries: • Construction Equipment-This injury can be above or below the ground level. Damage results from scarring,cutting of roots, and compaction of the soil. Placing a fenced buffer zone around plants to be saved prior to construction can prevent construction equipment injuries. • Grade Changes-Changing the natural ground level will alter grades, which affects the plant's ability to obtain the necessary air,water,and minerals. Minor fills usually do not cause problems although sensitivity between species does vary and should be checked. Trees can tolerate fill of 6 inches or less. For shrubs and other plants,the fill should be less. When there are major changes in grade, it may become necessary to supply air to the roots of plants. This can be done by placing a layer of gravel and a tile system over the roots before the fill is made. A tile 4-2 Volume 1l-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 system protects a tree from a raised grade. The tile system should be laid out on the original grade leading from a dry well around the tree trunk. The system should then be covered with small stones to allow air to circulate over the root area. Lowering the natural ground level can seriously damage trees and shrubs.The highest percentage of the plant roots are in the upper 12 inches of the soil and cuts of only 2-3 inches can cause serious injury. To protect the roots it may be necessary to terrace the immediate area around the plants to be saved. If roots are exposed, construction of retaining walls may be needed to keep the soil in place. Plants can also be preserved by leaving them on an undisturbed,gently sloping mound. To increase the chances for survival, it is best to limit grade changes and other soil disturbances to areas outside the dripline of the plant. • Excavations-Protect trees and other plants when excavating for drainfields,power,water,and sewer lines. Where possible, the trenches should be routed around trees and large shrubs. When this is not possible, it is best to tunnel under them. This can be done with hand tools or with power augers. If it is not possible to route the trench around plants to be saved,then the following should be observed: Cut as few roots as possible. When you have to cut, cut clean. Paint cut root ends with a wood dressing like asphalt base paint. Backfill the trench as soon as possible. Tunnel beneath root systems as close to the center of the main trunk to preserve most of the important feeder roots. Some problems that can be encountered with a few specific trees are: • Maple, Dogwood, Red alder, Western hemlock, Western red cedar, and Douglas fir do not readily adjust to changes in environment and special care should be taken to protect these trees. • The windthrow hazard of Pacific silver fir and madronna is high, while that of Western hemlock is moderate. The danger of windthrow increases where dense stands have been thinned. Other species(unless they are on shallow, wet soils less than 20 inches deep)have a low windthrow hazard. • Cottonwoods, maples,and willows have water-seeking roots. These can cause trouble in sewer lines and infiltration fields. On the other hand,they thrive in high moisture conditions that other trees would not. • Thinning operations in pure or mixed stands of Grand fir, Pacific silver fir, Noble fir, Sitka spruce, Western red cedar, Western hemlock, February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-3 r � Pacific dogwood, and Red alder can cause serious disease problems. Disease can become established through damaged limbs,trunks, roots, and freshly cut stumps. Diseased and weakened trees are also susceptible to insect attack. Maintenance • Inspect flagged and/or fenced areas regularly to make sure flagging or Standards fencing has not been removed or damaged. If the flagging or fencing has been damaged or visibility reduced, it shall be repaired or replaced immediately and visibility restored. • If tree roots have been exposed or injured, "prune" cleanly with an appropriate pruning saw or lopers directly above the damaged roots and recover with native soils. Treatment of sap flowing trees (fir, hemlock, pine, soft maples) is not advised as sap forms a natural healing barrier. 4-4 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 t 1 BMP C102: Buffer Zones Purpose An undisturbed area or strip of natural vegetation or an established suitable planting that will provide a living filter to reduce soil erosion and runoff velocities. Conditions of Use Natural buffer zones are used along streams, wetlands and other bodies of water that need protection from erosion and sedimentation. Vegetative buffer zones can be used to protect natural swales and can be incorporated into the natural landscaping of an area. Critical-areas buffer zones should not be used as sediment treatment areas. These areas shall remain completely undisturbed. The local permitting authority may expand the buffer widths temporarily to allow the use of the expanded area for removal of sediment. Design and • Preserving natural vegetation or plantings in clumps, blocks, or strips Installation is generally the easiest and most successful method. Specifications Leave all unstable steep slopes in natural vegetation. •• Mark clearing limits and keep all equipment and construction debris out of the natural areas. Steel construction fencing is the most effective method in protecting sensitive areas and buffers. Alternatively,wire-backed silt fence on steel posts is marginally effective. Flagging alone is typically not effective. • Keep all excavations outside the dripline of trees and shrubs. • Do not push debris or extra soil into the buffer zone area because it will cause damage from burying and smothering. • Vegetative buffer zones for streams, lakes or other waterways shall be established by the local permitting authority or other state or federal permits or approvals. Maintenance • Inspect the area frequently to make sure flagging remains in place Standards and the area remains undisturbed. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-5 Y � BMP C123: Plastic Covering Purpose Plastic covering provides immediate, short-term erosion protection to slopes and disturbed areas. Conditions of • Plastic covering may be used on disturbed areas that require cover Use measures for less than 30 days, except as stated below. • Plastic is particularly useful for protecting cut and fill slopes and stockpiles. Note: The relatively rapid breakdown of most polyethylene sheeting makes it unsuitable for long-term (greater than six months) applications. • Clear plastic sheeting can be used over newly-seeded areas to create a greenhouse effect and encourage grass growth if the hydroseed was installed too late in the season to establish 75 percent grass cover, or if the wet season started earlier than normal. Clear plastic should not be used for this purpose during the summer months because the resulting high temperatures can kill the grass. • Due to rapid runoff caused by plastic sheeting,this method shall not be used upslope of areas that might be adversely impacted by concentrated runoff. Such areas include steep and/or unstable slopes. • While plastic is inexpensive to purchase,the added cost of installation, maintenance, removal, and disposal make this an expensive material, up to$1.50-2.00 per square yard. • Whenever plastic is used to protect slopes, water collection measures must be installed at the base of the slope. These measures include plastic-covered berms, channels, and pipes used to covey clean rainwater away from bare soil and disturbed areas. At no time is clean runoff from a plastic covered slope to be mixed with dirty runoff from a project. • Other uses for plastic include: 1. Temporary ditch liner; 2. Pond liner in temporary sediment pond; 3. Liner for bermed temporary fuel storage area if plastic is not reactive to the type of fuel being stored; 4. Emergency slope protection during heavy rains;and, 5. Temporary drainpipe("elephant trunk")used to direct water. 4-26 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 5 Design and • Plastic slope cover must be installed as follows: Installation I Run plastic up and down slope, not across slope; Specifications 2. Plastic may be installed perpendicular to a slope if the slope length is less than 10 feet; 3. Minimum of 8-inch overlap at seams; 4. On long or wide slopes, or slopes subject to wind,all seams should be taped; 5. Place plastic into a small (12-inch wide by 6-inch deep) slot trench at the top of the slope and backfill with soil to keep water from flowing underneath; 6. Place sand filled burlap or geotextile bags every 3 to 6 feet along seams and pound a wooden stake through each to hold them in place; 7. Inspect plastic for rips, tears, and open seams regularly and repair immediately. This prevents high velocity runoff from contacting bare soil which causes extreme erosion; 8. Sandbags may be lowered into place tied to ropes. However, all sandbags must be staked in place. • Plastic sheeting shall have a minimum thickness of 0.06 millimeters. • If erosion at the toe of a slope is likely,a gravel berm, riprap, or other suitable protection shall be installed at the toe of the slope in order to reduce the velocity of runoff. Maintenance • Torn sheets must be replaced and open seams repaired. Standards • If the plastic begins to deteriorate due to ultraviolet radiation, it must be completely removed and replaced. • When the plastic is no longer needed, it shall be completely removed. • Dispose of old tires appropriately. February 2005 Volume II-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-27 Y 1 BMP C151: Concrete Handling Purpose Concrete work can generate process water and slurry that contain fine particles and high pH,both of which can violate water quality standards in the receiving water. This BMP is intended to minimize and eliminate concrete process water and slurry from entering waters of the state. Conditions of Use Any time concrete is used, these management practices shall be utilized. Concrete construction projects include,but are not limited to,the following: • Curbs • Sidewalks • Roads • Bridges • Foundations • Floors • Runways Design and • Concrete truck chutes, pumps, and internals shall be washed out only Installation into formed areas awaiting installation of concrete or asphalt. Specifications • Unused concrete remaining in the truck and pump shall be returned to the originating batch plant for recycling. • Hand tools including, but not limited to, screeds, shovels, rakes, floats, and trowels shall be washed off only into formed areas awaiting installation of concrete or asphalt. • Equipment that cannot be easily moved, such as concrete pavers, shall only be washed in areas that do not directly drain to natural or constructed stormwater conveyances. • Washdown from areas such as concrete aggregate driveways shall not drain directly to natural or constructed stormwater conveyances. • When no formed areas are available,washwater and leftover product shall be contained in a lined container. Contained concrete shall be disposed of in a manner that does not violate groundwater or surface water quality standards. Maintenance Containers shall be checked for holes in the liner daily during concrete Standards pours and repaired the same day. February 2005 Volume I!-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-43 k , BMP C153: Material Delivery, Storage and Containment Purpose Prevent,reduce, or eliminate the discharge of pollutants from material delivery and storage to the stormwater system or watercourses by minimizing the storage of hazardous materials onsite, storing materials in a designated area, and installing secondary containment. Conditions of Use These procedures are suitable for use at all construction sites with delivery and storage of the following materials: • Petroleum products such as fuel, oil and grease • Soil stabilizers and binders(e.g. Polyacrylamide) • Fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides • Detergents • Asphalt and concrete compounds • Hazardous chemicals such as acids, lime, adhesives,paints,solvents and curing compounds • Any other material that may be detrimental if released to the environment Design and The following steps should be taken to minimize risk: Installation Temporary storage area should be located away from vehicular traffic, •Specifications near the construction entrance(s), and away from waterways or storm drains. • Material Safety Data Sheets(MSDS) should be supplied for all materials stored. Chemicals should be kept in their original labeled containers. • Hazardous material storage on-site should be minimized. • Hazardous materials should be handled as infrequently as possible. • During the wet weather season (Oct 1 —April 30), consider storing materials in a covered area. • Materials should be stored in secondary containments, such as earthen dike, horse trough, or even a children's wading pool for non-reactive materials such as detergents, oil, grease, and paints. Small amounts of material may be secondarily contained in "bus boy"trays or concrete mixing trays. • Do not store chemicals, drums, or bagged materials directly on the ground. Place these items on a pallet and, when possible, in secondary containment. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Storm water Pollution Prevention 4-45 • If drums must be kept uncovered, store them at a slight angle to reduce ponding of rainwater on the lids to reduce corrosion.Domed plastic covers are inexpensive and snap to the top of drums, preventing water from collecting. Material Storage Areas and Secondary Containment Practices: • Liquids, petroleum products, and substances listed in 40 CFR Parts 110, 117,or 302 shall be stored in approved containers and drums and shall not be overfilled.Containers and drums shall be stored in temporary secondary containment facilities. • Temporary secondary containment facilities shall provide for a spill containment volume able to contain precipitation from a 25 year, 24 hour storm event, plus 10%of the total enclosed container volume of all containers, or 110%of the capacity of the largest container within its boundary, whichever is greater. • Secondary containment facilities shall be impervious to the materials stored therein for a minimum contact time of 72 hours. • Secondary containment facilities shall be maintained free of accumulated rainwater and spills. In the event of spills or leaks, accumulated rainwater and spills shall be collected and placed into drums. These liquids shall be handled as hazardous waste unless testing determines them to be non-hazardous. • Sufficient separation should be provided between stored containers to allow for spill cleanup and emergency response access. • During the wet weather season (Oct 1 —April 30), each secondary containment facility shall be covered during non-working days, prior to and during rain events. • Keep material storage areas clean,organized and equipped with an ample supply of appropriate spill clean-up material (spill kit). • The spill kit should include, at a minimum: • 1-Water Resistant Nylon Bag • 3-Oil Absorbent Socks 3"x 4' • 2-Oil Absorbent Socks 3"x 10' • 12-Oil Absorbent Pads 17"x19" • 1-Pair Splash Resistant Goggles • 3-Pair Nitrile Gloves • 10-Disposable Bags with Ties • Instructions 4-46 Volume ll—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 E + BMP C180: Small Project Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Purpose To prevent the discharge of sediment and other pollutants to the maximum extent practicable from small construction projects. Conditions of Use On small construction projects, those adding or replacing less than 2,000 square feet of impervious surface or clearing less than 7,000 square feet. Design and • Plan and implement proper clearing and grading of the site. It is most Installation important only to clear the areas needed, thus keeping exposed areas Specifications to a minimum. Phase clearing so that only those areas that are actively being worked are uncovered. Note: Clearing limits should be flagged in the lot or area prior to initiating clearing. • Soil shall be managed in a manner that does not permanently compact or deteriorate the final soil and landscape system. If disturbance and/or compaction occur the impact must be corrected at the end of the construction activity. This shall include restoration of soil depth, soil quality, permeability, and percent organic matter. Construction practices must not cause damage to or compromise the design of permanent landscape or infiltration areas. • Locate excavated basement soil a reasonable distance behind the curb, such as in the backyard or side yard area. This will increase the distance eroded soil must travel to reach the storm sewer system. Soil piles should be covered until the soil is either used or removed. Piles should be situated so that sediment does not run into the street or adjoining yards. • Backfill basement walls as soon as possible and rough grade the lot. This will eliminate large soil mounds, which are highly erodible, and prepares the lot for temporary cover,which will further reduce erosion potential. • Remove excess soil from the site as soon as possible after backfilling. This will eliminate any sediment loss from surplus fill. • If a lot has a soil bank higher than the curb,a trench or berm should be installed moving the bank several feet behind the curb. This will reduce the occurrence of gully and rill erosion while providing a storage and settling area for stormwater. • The construction entrance should be stabilized where traffic will be leaving the construction site and traveling on paved roads or other paved areas within 1,000 feet of the site. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-55 • • Provide for periodic street cleaning to remove any sediment that may have been tracked out. Sediment should be removed by shoveling or sweeping and carefully removed to a suitable disposal area where it will not be re-eroded. • Utility trenches that run up and down slopes must be backfilled within seven days. Cross-slope trenches may remain open throughout construction to provide runoff interception and sediment trapping, provided that they do not convey turbid runoff off site. 4-56 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 1 � BMP C233: Silt Fence Purpose Use of a silt fence reduces the transport of coarse sediment from a construction site by providing a temporary physical barrier to sediment and reducing the runoff velocities of overland flow. See Figure 4.19 for details on silt fence construction. Conditions of Use Silt fence may be used downslope of all disturbed areas. • Silt fence is not intended to treat concentrated flows,nor is it intended to treat substantial amounts of overland flow. Any concentrated flows must be conveyed through the drainage system to a sediment pond. The only circumstance in which overland flow can be treated solely by a silt fence, rather than by a sediment pond, is when the area draining to the fence is one acre or less and flow rates are less than 0.5 cfs. • Silt fences should not be constructed in streams or used in V-shaped ditches. They are not an adequate method of silt control for anything deeper than sheet or overland flow. Joints in filter fabric shall be spliced at posts.Use staples,wire rings or 2"x2"by 14 Ga.wire or equivalent to attach fabric to posts equivalent,if standard strength fabric used , 'ia:s plaseisspaai :€ 'i hiiloaiewiii 1 - aioiiia®isagg I Filter fabric :aaaaoe=ran:: I I� 'lilies MU: ft iV MO®BHiii _ -ii i; E ;�;� i t71 7• it ,i1i=i iin�ii- r ;i-i-�r a: _ 6'max --�I I - Minimum 4"x4"trench I~ F Backfill trench with native soil Post spacing may be increased -\ or 3/4"-1.5"washed gravel to 8'if wire backing is used 2"x2"wood posts,steel fence posts,or equivalent Figure 4.19—Silt Fence Design and • Drainage area of 1 acre or less or in combination with sediment basin Installation in a larger site. Specifications • Maximum slope steepness (normal (perpendicular)to fence line) 1:1. • Maximum sheet or overland flow path length to the fence of 100 feet. • No flows greater than 0.5 cfs. • The geotextile used shall meet the following standards. All geotextile properties listed below are minimum average roll values(i.e.,the test result for any sampled roll in a lot shall meet or exceed the values shown in Table 4.10): 4-94 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 Table 4.10 Geotextile Standards Polymeric Mesh AOS 0.60 mm maximum for slit film wovens(#30 sieve). 0.30 (ASTM D4751) mm maximum for all other geotextile types(#50 sieve). 0.15 mm minimum for all fabric types(#100 sieve). Water Permittivity 0.02 sec'minimum (ASTM D4491) Grab Tensile Strength 180 lbs.Minimum for extra strength fabric. (ASTM D4632) 100 lbs minimum for standard strength fabric. Grab Tensile Strength 30%maximum (ASTM D4632) Ultraviolet Resistance 70%minimum (ASTM D4355) • Standard strength fabrics shall be supported with wire mesh,chicken wire,2-inch x 2-inch wire, safety fence, or jute mesh to increase the strength of the fabric. Silt fence materials are available that have synthetic mesh backing attached. • Filter fabric material shall contain ultraviolet ray inhibitors and stabilizers to provide a minimum of six months of expected usable construction life at a temperature range of 0°F.to 120°F. • 100 percent biodegradable silt fence is available that is strong, long lasting, and can be left in place after the project is completed, if permitted by local regulations. • Standard Notes for construction plans and specifications follow. Refer to Figure 4.19 for standard silt fence details. The contractor shall install and maintain temporary silt fences at the locations shown in the Plans. The silt fences shall be constructed in the areas of clearing, grading, or drainage prior to starting those activities. A silt fence shall not be considered temporary if the silt fence must function beyond the life of the contract. The silt fence shall prevent soil carried by runoff water from going beneath,through, or over the top of the silt fence, but shall allow the water to pass through the fence. The minimum height of the top of silt fence shall be 2 feet and the maximum height shall be 2V2 feet above the original ground surface. The geotextile shall be sewn together at the point of manufacture, or at an approved location as determined by the Engineer,to form geotextile lengths as required. All sewn seams shall be located at a support post. Alternatively,two sections of silt fence can be overlapped,provided the Contractor can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Engineer,that the overlap is long enough and that the adjacent fence sections are close enough together to prevent silt laden water from escaping through the fence at the overlap. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-95 4 The geotextile shall be attached on the up-slope side of the posts and support system with staples, wire, or in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The geotextile shall be attached to the posts in a manner that reduces the potential for geotextile tearing at the staples,wire, or other connection device. Silt fence back-up support for the geotextile in the form of a wire or plastic mesh is dependent on the properties of the geotextile selected for use. If wire or plastic back-up mesh is used,the mesh shall be fastened securely to the up-slope of the posts with the geotextile being up-slope of the mesh back-up support. The geotextile at the bottom of the fence shall be buried in a trench to a minimum depth of 4 inches below the ground surface. The trench shall be backfilled and the soil tamped in place over the buried portion of the geotextile, such that no flow can pass beneath the fence and scouring can not occur. When wire or polymeric back-up support mesh is used,the wire or polymeric mesh shall extend into the trench a minimum of 3 inches. The fence posts shall be placed or driven a minimum of 18 inches. A minimum depth of 12 inches is allowed if topsoil or other soft subgrade soil is not present and a minimum depth of 18 inches cannot be reached. Fence post depths shall be increased by 6 inches if the fence is located on slopes of 3:1 or steeper and the slope is perpendicular to the fence. If required post depths cannot be obtained, the posts shall be adequately secured by bracing or guying to prevent overturning of the fence due to sediment loading. Silt fences shall be located on contour as much as possible, except at the ends of the fence, where the fence shall be turned uphill such that the silt fence captures the runoff water and prevents water from flowing around the end of the fence. If the fence must cross contours, with the exception of the ends of the fence, gravel check dams placed perpendicular to the back of the fence shall be used to minimize concentrated flow and erosion along the back of the fence. The gravel check dams shall be approximately 1- foot deep at the back of the fence. It shall be continued perpendicular to the fence at the same elevation until the top of the check dam intercepts the ground surface behind the fence. The gravel check dams shall consist of crushed surfacing base course, gravel backfill for walls,or shoulder ballast. The gravel check dams shall be located every 10 feet along the fence where the fence must cross contours. The slope of the fence line where contours must be crossed shall not be steeper than 3:1. Wood, steel or equivalent posts shall be used. Wood posts shall have minimum dimensions of 2 inches by 2 inches by 3 feet minimum length, and shall be free of defects such as knots, splits,or gouges. 4-96 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 Y • Steel posts shall consist of either size No. 6 rebar or larger,ASTM A 120 steel pipe with a minimum diameter of 1-inch, U,T, L, or C shape steel posts with a minimum weight of 1.35 lbs./ft.or other steel posts having equivalent strength and bending resistance to the post sizes listed. The spacing of the support posts shall be a maximum of 6 feet. Fence back-up support, if used, shall consist of steel wire with a maximum mesh spacing of 2 inches, or a prefabricated polymeric mesh. The strength of the wire or polymeric mesh shall be equivalent to or greater than 180 lbs. grab tensile strength. The polymeric mesh must be as resistant to ultraviolet radiation as the geotextile it supports. • Silt fence installation using the slicing method specification details follow. Refer to Figure 4.20 for slicing method details. The base of both end posts must be at least 2 to 4 inches above the top of the silt fence fabric on the middle posts for ditch checks to drain properly. Use a hand level or string level, if necessary,to mark base points before installation. Install posts 3 to 4 feet apart in critical retention areas and 6 to 7 feet apart in standard applications. Install posts 24 inches deep on the downstream side of the silt fence, and as close as possible to the fabric, enabling posts to support the fabric from upstream water pressure. Install posts with the nipples facing away from the silt fence fabric. Attach the fabric to each post with three ties, all spaced within the top 8 inches of the fabric. Attach each tie diagonally 45 degrees through the fabric,with each puncture at least 1 inch vertically apart. In addition, each tie should be positioned to hang on a post nipple when tightening to prevent sagging. Wrap approximately 6 inches of fabric around the end posts and secure with 3 ties. No more than 24 inches of a 36-inch fabric is allowed above ground level. The rope lock system must be used in all ditch check applications. The installation should be checked and corrected for any deviation before compaction. Use a flat-bladed shovel to tuck fabric deeper into the ground if necessary. Compaction is vitally important for effective results. Compact the soil immediately next to the silt fence fabric with the front wheel of the tractor,skid steer, or roller exerting at least 60 pounds per square inch. Compact the upstream side first and then each side twice for a total of four trips. February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-97 • I • Any damage shall be repaired immediately. Maintenance If concentrated flows are evident uphill of the fence,they must be •Standards intercepted and conveyed to a sediment pond. • It is important to check the uphill side of the fence for signs of the fence clogging and acting as a barrier to flow and then causing channelization of flows parallel to the fence. If this occurs,replace the fence or remove the trapped sediment. • Sediment deposits shall either be removed when the deposit reaches approximately one-third the height of the silt fence, or a second silt fence shall be installed. • If the filter fabric(geotextile)has deteriorated due to ultraviolet breakdown, it shall be replaced. Pending height I POST SPACING: max.24" 7'max.on span runs ..�1 4'max.on pooling areas Top of Fabric T • ., Belt is.}Attach fabric to 1 upstream side at post ' L FLOW- Drive ever each aide or fi POST DEPTH: silt fence 2 to•times I• As much below ground with devic•exerting ¢ as fabric above ground 80 p.a.!.or greater ;: 100%aompactle. 100%compaction Diagonal anachmem damles strength /\�\\%\\/S \\/�\\�\\ \\ :::�®s._iiii r // �////// . �t!&•. c \�! /\\/\/\\/\\\ t. i '' //���` \//j/�//�/A ATTACHMENT IXTAAS: 4 f{ j//\\�\ \\�\ •Gamer fabric at posts,V needed. // //\\\// */ \\ �/ /\� •Utilize tree ties per post.at wain top 8'of fabric. %..<4. / • alien m hdiagonally,puncturing holesveucaly of diagonally, •Hang each tie on a post nipple and tighten sectrely. No more than 24"of a 36"fabric Use cable ties(soltA or soli wire. is allowed above ground. Rol of silt fence F.. Oppration Post lit ... .,,,,, IP f -, after compaction Fabric above Silt Fence tom°• _ O� ��C _a ?7 F=4 • Vii r e F''�`<c�' _klittofibge Lt.,; �,r. 200-3OOmm i��'�� - .%�4 Horizontal chisel petit Slicing blade (76 mm width) (18 mm width) Completed kutatation Vibratory plow is not acceptable because of horizontal compaction Figure 4.20-Silt Fence Installation by Slicing Method 4-98 Volume II-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 L • V V BMP C235: Straw Wattles Purpose Straw wattles are temporary erosion and sediment control barriers consisting of straw that is wrapped in biodegradable tubular plastic or similar encasing material. They reduce the velocity and can spread the flow of rill and sheet runoff, and can capture and retain sediment. Straw wattles are typically 8 to 10 inches in diameter and 25 to 30 feet in length. The wattles are placed in shallow trenches and staked along the contour of disturbed or newly constructed slopes. See Figure 4.21 for typical construction details. Conditions of Use • Disturbed areas that require immediate erosion protection. • Exposed soils during the period of short construction delays,or over winter months. • On slopes requiring stabilization until permanent vegetation can be established. • Straw wattles are effective for one to two seasons. • If conditions are appropriate, wattles can be staked to the ground using willow cuttings for added revegetation. • Rilling can occur beneath wattles if not properly entrenched and water can pass between wattles if not tightly abutted together. Design Criteria • It is critical that wattles are installed perpendicular to the flow direction and parallel to the slope contour. • Nan-ow trenches should be dug across the slope on contour to a depth of 3 to 5 inches on clay soils and soils with gradual slopes. On loose soils, steep slopes, and areas with high rainfall,the trenches should be dug to a depth of 5 to 7 inches, or 1/2 to 2/3 of the thickness of the wattle. • Start building trenches and installing wattles from the base of the slope and work up. Excavated material should be spread evenly along the uphill slope and compacted using hand tamping or other methods. • Construct trenches at contour intervals of 3 to 30 feet apart depending on the steepness of the slope, soil type, and rainfall. The steeper the slope the closer together the trenches. • Install the wattles snugly into the trenches and abut tightly end to end. Do not overlap the ends. • Install stakes at each end of the wattle, and at 4-foot centers along entire length of wattle. • If required, install pilot holes for the stakes using a straight bar to drive holes through the wattle and into the soil. • At a minimum, wooden stakes should be approximately 3/4 x 3/4 x 24 inches. Willow cuttings or 3/8-inch rebar can also be used for stakes. 4-100 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention February 2005 J k Maintenance • Stakes should be driven through the middle of the wattle, leaving 2 to 3 Standards inches of the stake protruding above the wattle. ' • Wattles may require maintenance to ensure they are in contact with soil and thoroughly entrenched, especially after significant rainfall on steep sandy soils. • Inspect the slope after significant storms and repair any areas where wattles are not tightly abutted or water has scoured beneath the wattles. 3'-4' I I ■ (1.2m) .<. Straw Rolls Must ` �� �'� - � � � !%`�! �. Be Placed Along \�\�� s; '! /,i `‘, Slope Contours / ..,7J,:-.1.04 `` y ,'%' / b* Adjacent rolls shall ,/:,:, tightly abut ' k`' i I\ii 4-s.-, 10-25 (3-8m) � / ` , F `\//\\\ i\ ` �� . Spacing Depends .:%� Slope Soil Type and peen \�/�\//\%..,,,,>), Sediment,organic matter,and native seeds are K\ / captured behind the rolls. l, ;:i\//\. J — 3"-5"(75-125mm) `'S �s / • \''/X's4 ! ) .\ \ 8"-10"DIA. , ,, /,'// i%>< (200 250mm) Imo, \ \ + _t UV: V Live Stake i �' ' T --/ . \ > l., ,,` 1" X 1" Stake not to scale (25 x 25mm) //.1 I\- NOTE: 1.Straw roll installation requires the placement and secure staking of the roll in a trench,3"-5"(75-125mm) deep,dug on contour. runoff must not be allowed to run under or around roll. Figure 4.21 —Straw Wattles February 2005 Volume II—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-101 a • • Jefferson County DCD Building Division Correction Notice PERMIT NUMBER /02 d b 357- OWNER 514A JOB LOCATION i/o a zoVa.'s 5 it"I Y Inspection of this structure has found the following violations: t../ PANS ,Jo-r eio �tr6 (x) 6441 e„OeLL —TO 1 *' L E v/L Nor Ii05-ti1 L - O 5,144k o-. oree'7 Ii;P r R_ 4 •SASE dl:iU fi .3g" C'M I IA)A-nr. Per U 614020 RAIL R6l U►Re" D tdArga. NO?- -ntizkra 1) OA) ( GGN t'rriew l Z Rfo7 - (Al.. >v • 1307-1 AS S—rffl? p 1N C. r t i tear`,5 F6tz 5Li,t ,C N 6 PE ZAA fT CAL- 11131 ‘ A LET-) 47L .sg- eit?t e -/iu.5Piefior.) k/NSAU 'felt 5 F 1-7-40-4 S /r1,ee CCM pti D lJ er/4 You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. Date 4/4170 Inspecto BUILDING DIVISION(360)379-4450 SECTION HOTLINE(360)379-4455 I THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE I • Jefferson County DCD Building Division Correction Notice PERMIT NUMBER ja- 39Z- OWN ER 5/.44/ y JOB LOCATION l/L5 a".tSVA---5 1/Sy Inspection of this structure has found the following violations: PP/i ME /ag AS1 ?a 1)51'r1 L I , P R i a r. 'T o f i hoc /O SP gisugN4rN (D e criZ;CAL. ,..01°14. o P --u 6'Y t y a/I) 0 ( 3 - � I You are hereby notified that no more work shall be done upon these premises until the above violations are corrected, unless noted otherwise. When corrections have been made, call for inspection. Date ldl Inspector 9�.I BUILDING DIVISION(360)379-4450 INSPECTION HOTLINE(360)379-4455 THIS NOTICE MUST BE KEPT WITH APPROVED PLANS ON SITE I Jefferson County Building Buildin tision Permit Number: BLD12-00382 Applicant: SHAY BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION APPROVALS Applicable Code: 2009 International Building Codes To schedule inspections, call (360)379-4455 no later than 3:00PM the day before the inspection is needed. Requests received after 3:00 PM will not be scheduled for the next day's inspections. ELECTRICAL PERMITS are issued by the Washington State Department of Labor& Industries. The electrical permit must be signed off by the State Inspector prior to the County's Framing Inspection Inspection Item Date Approval Signature Notes Setbacks '03 3 Erosion Control / Foundation Footing 3 0; Footing Drains 3I(41 0 Foundation Stem Wall t9 13 Underground Plumbing 3_1313 ro Under Floor Framing _' f'6 Straps(hold downs) 0/13 65 Ext.Shear Wall Nailing 4 _t 3 Rough-in Plumbing �L . Framing a/ � Airseal � i �; of ii Insulation:Walls 3 fl 1.1/ Insulation:Floors Insulation:Ceiling ,1/41/ Int.Shear Wall Nailing AY-A■ Wallboard Nailing 411 `tc .c G � Ail,- qc,y Gas Line: Interior A�� Gas Line: Exterior Propane Tank A Heat/Chimney Clearance Heat/Chimney Clearance IV A 37 +pLICNreA Wood/Pellet Stove 2/41/ Mechanical Systems h,//V A Duct Test Cert Blower Airtight Test /AI jig Smoke&CO2 11 1 Drywell/Alt Drainage 3 1 f l /3 ¢ Engineered plan-see condition 2 Address Posted i ! (� Water Meter Inspection �!. II 0 0 &card I :21---- tor S FINAL INSPECTION III 10 let FINAL INSP CTION UST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING BEING OCCUPIED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR • • CONDITIONS for Building Permit# :BLD12-00382 1.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED APRIL 3, 2012 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 2.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMITAWRITTEN LETTER FROM CATHERINE R. BAILEY, PE STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMWATER PLAN DATED MARCH 5, 2012 AS SIGNED BY CATHERINE R. BAILEY, PE. 3.) The project is located within WRIA 17 and thus is subject to compliance with the WA State Department of Ecology In-Stream Flow Rule for that region. The parcel is located within the Squamish sub-basin in a designated Coastal Management Area; as such, state regulations require the following: 1. INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER, MEETING DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS, IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW USES THROUGHOUT THE WATERSHED. (WAC 173-517-180). BROCHURES WITH SPECIFICATIONS ARE ENCLOSED WITH THE PERMIT. Refer to enclosed documents for more INFORMATION; see Ecology web site at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/instream-flows/quilsnowbasin.html or contact Ecology at 360-407-6300. 4.) 10' minimum separation required between the water line and any onsite sewage system components including sewage transport lines. 5.) The proposal shall comply with all of the recommendations in geotechnical report. 6.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 7.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 8.) MANDATORY MEASURES F4OASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 9.) A vegetative buffer of 30-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. As stated in the geotechnical report: For safety of the proposed structures, a minimum prudent building setback of 100 feet from top of the slope is recommended for all building structures. Setback recommendation is equivalent to a vertical height of bluff as measured at the maximum distance to uppermost bench level along bluff, and consistent with standard practice and county requirements. Additional setback is recommended if feasible, in recognition of potential loss of value to the developed property where shoreline landslides have encroached on development in other regional shoreline areas. 10.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the landslide hazard area buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 13.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 14.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 15.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 16.) An engineered stormwater plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the engineer of record to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the engineer verifies plan compliance and submits a letter to Jefferson County Department of Community Development. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 17.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 18.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 19.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 20.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 21.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 22.) Setback from Groves Way and Thorndyke Road rights-of-way is no less than 20 ft., side and rear setbacks are no less than 5 ft. If an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) is present, then the more restrictive setback shall apply. 23.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 24.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 25.) To obtain an accessory dwelling unit(ADU)designation, the owner of the subject property shall reside on the premises, either in the main or accessory dwelling. \Uirlemark\data\fnrmc\F RI 11 Permit Rhin rnt 7/7/7013 • BUILDING PERMIT • Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 PERMIT#: BLD12-00382 Received Date: 11/26/2012 SITE ADDRESS: 110 GROVES WAY Issue Date 2/7/2013 PORT LUDLOW, 98365 Expiration Date 2/7/2014 OWNER: QUINTEN SHAY PHONE: 206-455-9650 11031 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD ISSAQUAH WA 98027-8696 THORNDYKE BAY SHORT PLAT#3 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 3 PARCEL NUMBER: 721194012 Section: 19 Township: 27 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW ADU W/ATT GARAGE TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP ADU MAIN: 1,248 VALUATION 170,005.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: WOD CODE EDITION: 2009 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N GARAGE: 1,250 SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: SETBACK: DECK: 1,500 BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: CON WATER SYSTEM: 1 PWELL Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Permit $1,391.35 LYK 11/26/12 139775 Exist: 0 Exist: 0 Plan Check $904.38 LYK 11/26/12 139775 Prop: 2 Prop: 2 State Building Code $4.50 LYK 11/26/12 139775 Total: 2 Total: 2 Potable Water Application $64.00 LYK 11/26/12 139775 Total: $2,364.23 Directions to Site: HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR OR IT MUST BE PROPERLY RENEWED BUILDING INSPECTION HOT-LINE 379-4455. Request must be received by 3pm the day before the inspection is needed. Office Hours 9:00 am -4:30 pm MONDAY -THURSDAY HOT LINE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLY-SEE ATTATCHED f 6�, JEFFERSON COUNTY { DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: /1-17 Time Received: 75-y am( r) Mon. 4-111% Wed. Thur. Fri. Date: I BLD: f ' 302 Contact Name: Owner: --174q1/ Contact Number: 360 70/ 705-6 Address: //0 G. es / 206 Notes: Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation Final Inspection >, - Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted Block&Tile Ceiling ' . - • -1•5,,ir,..—•,atiK• . . _:. • - • , 64*-A,;:, - • . . • • - . It • . • g: - • Date 04;1 'time received 2.5 9 am /62 on. Tues. Wed:* Thur. -Fri. • BED: , 1 2 - g K2- . . - Date:.712.1- - . OWNER:. S1/1—/ - . . Contact Namer. .;- ADDRESS: fl 0 - 9r27/.e!$ 141,t7i Contact Number.36.0 71)/ 7 e ,76.,..-, ;. Notes: c_Ji., 1.,.7 . • - 206 " • k : . ' • • ' - - . . . Foundation umbing -Framing' • . Propane Tank- - Mechanical • Setbacks Under-ground Framing X OndeCground . Furnace Footing Rough in "M Air seal Above ground Gas Stemwall _ Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil A Straps Interior shear Interior lines • Ducts T. - Post Hole ' • Ventilation . Appliance Underfloor Gas/wood stove y.... Man-Homes • . III Setbacks -- ' Insulation . . Final Inspection Foundation . :.,.1 • Block&T-te floor wall ceiling . Address Poste'd • 1 • 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 — ;. °• i I ataiiii iii -_ • • Date time received l P-0_____am ,li� d��': Tues. .Wed: Thur. -Fri. • BLD: , 1 n2 ^ 3 ? /� Date: 5 OWNER: .5G'1A-71 Contact Names ADDRESS: i/U �-✓-o ire-5 w4 Y Contact Number 360 7th/ 7ts��b Notes: 206 �r .Foundation Plu�mbin'g - Framing Propane Tank ' Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Footing Rough In Air seal Under ground Furnace Sooting l __ Rough In Above ground _ Gas ____ StraStraps Exterior shear _____ Exterior lines _ Oil Hole Interior shear Interior lines Ducts -- Ventilation _ Underfloor Appliance _ Man-Homes - Gas/wood stove F II Setbacks Insulation. Foundation— Final Inspect on . Block&Tie floor _wall ceiling. . '; Address Postd f a{ JEFFERSON COUNTY gsfff-`�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: [( "($ Time Received: j am Mon. Tue. Wedgy/ Thur. Fri. BLD: 12_ 3�2 Date: f 1-____-1!_i Aver: Contact Name: ress: Contact Number: 360 206 Notes: Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under ground d roun Framing Under g Footing Rough In Furance Stemwall Air Seal Above ground Hydronic Exterior shear Gas Straps Hot Water Htr Exterior lines Oil Interior shear Interior lines Post Hole Ducts Ventilation Underfloor Appliance Man-Homes Gas/Wood stove Insulation IP Setbacks Final lns Inspection Foundation Floor Block&Tile Wall Ceiling Address Posted • I I • eON o064, JEFFERSON COUNTY w ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9,697 N° O Date: 7/Ij® Time Received: r:0C, am all. Mon. Tue. Wed. 4gr Fri. • /i Date: '01/ BLD: 12 Qo3g2- Contact Name: Owner: S yA'r Contact Number: 360 7pl • 70547 Address: to �,,.A./ES W, I-. 206 Notes: FLOW E:1L. AIT, i 16k-t, r Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation Final Inspection Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted Block&Tile Ceiling r • S r -% JEFFERSON COUNTY i { dwi NG,e DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: 7 ,, Time Received: an) Tue. Wed. Thur. ri. Date: 7-19 BLD: / - 5 8 L Contact Name: Owner: 611/y Contact Number: 360 •ress: //p / V y'u i02.S C(.rA,/ 206 Notes: 8U)t2f-eY / (. 0 /2iT Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation IIIFinal Inspection Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted Block&Tile Ceiling ,,,,SON cbc, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT te: tib Time Received: //37 d9pm Mon. df, Wed. Thur. Fri. Date: —(7 BLD: /2-382 Contact Name: Owner: ., -.4' Contact Number: 360 T©/---- 705--6 Address: J/© ez ,/es 4/4-7 206 Notes: (�—(mac) ( t,,-)A j1-ecv ,i<J -- 4L T4„,...., - //// p Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts 0 Post Hole . Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation Final Inspection Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted ili r Tilg ,sON c, wow °?� JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: " ' Time Received: Z„ 0 ‘ `j am/C0 Mon. Tue. Wed. 1111P Fri. Date: ?""r _ BLD: — Contact Name: `'�' er: # Contact Number: 360 78 («-1 b3 1 206 ress: 11110 e r. 0 V ' .. 3_ L Notes: 4JscLA...eorS Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes nsulation • , Final Inspection Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted Block&Tile Ceiling _ . . -. • ,. . 0 - ---4.-=--"‘ . - . l'E, - •-;:zr . ...n, • Date _ . _ k -2- t- - ‘ _D am / ___ o___ ___0_ ime r d eceive - ) ig) (. r) TueS. Wed: Thur. BLD: 2- (Z-z-- Date: OWNER: bt CA-44 • . - Contact Name: ADDRESS: t-10 il_6(,) tc, (JO ir-13-tA Contact Number:360 11 Notes: - 206 - , a - • Foundation P It..__E___n _gbin - Framing t Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Underground Furnace - - Footing Rough in Air seal Above ground Gas Stexnwall _ Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil _ -- Straps Interior shear Interior lines . Ducts 1 Post Hole Ventilation — Appliance e Man-Homes —,______ • Underfloor _ Gas/wood stove Setbacks • Insulation . Final Inspection Foundat .ion . — -,...1 -5 Block&Tie floor wall ceiling Address Posted i _ . • - . . . - .., . - - • . . . . . . -..-Z1VM:4,'",,='• . . '. ' - ''.=•"1°7'1':',-.?.:'. • • • • . . i:''' ''t:^1V:4 . . . •.•.Z4V.A.,,'i4Z.t.l:'gj.'q .• . • . . • --'. 11111§r:;;: - . • . _ . - . . • Date k2"4( time received-A) ,'as am /Op Mon. TueS. e 4 -Pti. .....—, BLD: Pe 3 i 2,..... Date: ' c) . . • OWNER: ...1 -6.6,..iii Contact Name: - • ADDRESS: - Ii 0 v. Contact Number.360 -7/7/ — 70,574. . . a 206 Notes: . " D s _ v . - . . Foundation 'Plumbing - Framing . Propane Tank Mechanical . . Setbacks _ Under-ground Framing Under ground Furnace — - Footing _____ Rough in Alr seal .... Above ground Gas Stemwall ___ Hydronic Exterior shear .- .,.. Z Exterior lines ..., Oil Straps Interior shear Interior lines . Ducts f . -- • Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor -........_ , Gas/wood stove 4111 Man-Homes Setbacks Insulation. Final Inspection ., Foundation . Nock&Tie floor _wall ceiling. Address Posted s . - ). . W.F. •e 1:4 av;;.`•:.'4 - 7‘,.SIFFerP'4.- T.,..„-•...r.„4-•-•4.1,..5,1142 ..y•r.vri •:- i MY ba 4 41 54 • - 17--;41- .......t.v.....:,_............,....:-..:,...z.. • - - . _ 20 - ,..,k. A*: 411) Date ...:0''' time received am i pm Mon. TueS. Wed: ...Fri. BLD: .- - , - . Date: ts--•._30 OWNER: Alci , - Contact Name: .olik - - ADDRESS: L\ 0 riLoo, Contact Number:360 t. 70 s....: Notes: 206 . . .,..........5rn a 4k112S . . 0• • • • . Foundation Plumbing - Framing Propane Tank- Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Underground Furnace Footing Rough in Air seat Above ground Gas Stemwali _ Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Interior shear Interior lines , Ducts ___ Post Hole • • Ventilation Appliance Underfloor . •Gas/wood stove Man-Homes • • Setbacks . • Insulation. • Final Inspection '..l Foundation -.•?:- Block&Tie floor _wall ceiling. . Address Posted I 4 I. 1 -..- • • •, 3 kk • •0 /`z/7 _ _ Date IS time received //Oar 6 I 0 Mon. Tues. Wed: Thur. -Fri. • BLD: 12 3z.. 3j?Z • Date: ' OWNER: Contact Name; ADDRESS: 7 &Co v°a Contact Number:360 t •,7.•t. Notes: 206 ?x • • • -Foundation Plumbing • F. gamin° . Propane Tank - • '"• Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Underground Furnace Footing Rough In Air seal — Stemwalf __ Hydronic Above ground — Gas Straps Exterior shear Exterior lines — Oil Interior shear Interior lines • Ducts Post Hole � Ventilation "— ---- ' Underfloor Appliance • Man-Homes Gas/wood stove— Setbacks ' Insulation. • Foundation Final Inspection -i Block&Tie floor _wall ceiling ° _ • Address Posted lir—"- - :;;;-4:44 a i• * i-ig-i-fi l 'm'ml."mI.°ln"ml°11.111M1MMIMMIMIMMMMIMIIIMIMIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 41) ADDRESS: . t /C N120C)-eS WitA_EA ...—... Contact Number:360 --70(-7n-b Notes: . 4755-(14VACCA.,</ ., - . -e- Foundation .Plumbing - Framing Propane Tank - Mechanical -. ' Setbacks Under—ground Framing Under Furnace Footing Rough in ___� A�noa --- � __- Sternwall _ Hydronic Exterior --� Above v'`~= Gas ___ '�_—. Exterior lines Oil Straps Interior shear -- interior -- �-- • Post Hole Ventilation ---- �-- Ducts �c�_^_' ^_-- Appliance Underfloor Gas/wood man��n�x � --- """" IN0ISetbacks ' ' Insulation Foundation Final Inspection Block floor wall ceiling Address �� �� / `� - _ _ _- . _ - V• , <5y ' ry--Wkiiiip-L'A - • • • • Date // 'time received- /l/ 9i pm'�—C°J' Mon. Wedgy Thur. -• ri. MD: 12- 38 2 Date: 3 i • OWNER: HAY Contact Name: ADDRESS: /d &v'o-reS Contact Number:360 —70(705 • r :1'. t Notes: 206 �F Foundation Plumbing • Framing . Propane Tank Mechanical ' Setbacks Framing Under ground Furnace _ Footing ..— Rough in Air seal Above ground Gas — Stemwail X. Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil _ Straps Interior shear Interior lines Ducts P ill ost Hole Ventilation —' —— Underfloor Appliance _ Man-Homes .. Gaslwood stove Setbacks Insulation. Foundation _ Final Inspection Block&Tie floor wall ceilin `� g Address Posted l' �. a ' • Date l (2 time received c 1%S3 am / pm Mon. Tues. 4-9/ Thur. --Fri. • BLD: 1 r 3 . Z.--- pu Date: 77 3 r---- OWNER: ____ri� ^ - _ Contact Name. ADDRESS: - 1 1 V 6A00 "" Contact Number 360 '.0\ 1 DS rp 206 r'. Notes: C��� Foundation Plumbing - Framing . Propane Tank - Mechanical Setbacks _ Under-ground V Framing Underground Furnace Footing Rough in Air seal Above ground Gas Stemwall __ Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps interior shear Interior lines • Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/wood stove Man-Homes - • Setbacks • Insulation Final Inspection Foundation ',' N Block&Tiie floor _wall ceiling. . Address Posted ,g. • Date?-I2- time received /0...5-9 1 pm Mon. Tues. ' ed Thur. - Pri. BID: I Z — 3 2- Date: `L OWNER: - - Contact Name: • ADDRESS: I/ �9 ► GbVC'S LAMY Contact Number 360 70/ 7O5 ti Notes: 206 , . Foundation Plumbing -Framing Propane Tank • Mechanical ' Setbacks . Under-ground Framing Underground . Furnace _ Footing Rough in Alr seal Above ground _ Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil _ Ducts Straps Interior shear Interior lines _ Post Hole • Ventilation Appliance _ 0 Underfloor Gas/wood stove Man-Homes Setbacks S - Insulation. Final Inspection 5 Foundation 'i Block&Tie floor wall ceiling ' Y``S g Address Posted , �w¢SON CO JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4- 9`N7 N GZ(3 )ate: '),.# Time Received: '50 am..fl Mon Tue. Wed. Thur. Fri. Date: 1Z - Cc 3LD: 11 3'8'dx- Contact Name: Jwner: Contact Number: 360 701 Jd 4ddress: 1 iD C.(mes 206 Notes: Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation Final Inspection Setbacks Floor Foundation Wall Address Posted -•- • :;•.? 4!: °2 JEFFERSON COUNTY �� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT s s Date: /, 4:4 Time Received: ✓( ar r: ) Mo Tue. Wed Thur. Fri. Date: ' /1',"02(� BLD: /,' gZ Contact Name: Owner: Contact Number: 360 ?49/.71 Address: OD G/?A✓P5 206 Notes: Foundation Plumbing Framing Propane Tank Mechanical Setbacks Under-ground Framing Under ground Furance Footing Rough In Air Seal Above ground Gas Stemwall Hydronic Exterior shear Exterior lines Oil Straps Hot Water Htr Interior shear Interior lines Ducts Post Hole Ventilation Appliance Underfloor Gas/Wood stove Man-Homes Insulation �[ Final Inspection_ / \. - Setbacks Floor Foundation Wail Address Posted, Block &Tile Ceiling