Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZON2003-00021 Josh Peters From: Josh Peters Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:34 PM To: 'woodland@woodlandmgmt.com' Cc: Al Scalf; David Alvarez Subject: Attn:Jim Wick Greetings Mr. Wick: Since we have been playing phone tag, I thought I would provide some background with an email message, so that when we get a chance to discuss this issue,you would already be informed about the basics. I am the planner assigned to the site-specific amendment applications on the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. Your company is representing ANE Forests of Puget Sound, Inc.with regard to a site-specific amendment application for Jefferson County parcel number 901 364 012, located on SR 19 (NESE - Gov Lot 1 - Sec 36, T 29 N, R 1 W). The file number for the application is MLA03-189. The application states that the landowner is seeking Rural Residential (RR) 1 dwelling unit per 10 acres (1:10) zoning for a 40-acre parcel that is currently zoned RR 1:20. It has come to my attention only recently(on August 6 to be exact,the date of release of our staff report on the site-specific amendment applications)that the parcel was effectively divided on January 27, 2003 into two distinct parcels per landowner request, under the provision of Washington State law that addresses situations where a public road divides an existing parcel of land. The fact that the subject real property is no longer one 40-acre parcel, but rather two distinct parcels, one 22.56-acre parcel entirely east of SR 19 with parcel number 901 364 012 and one 15.99-acre parcel entirely west of SR 19 with parcel number 901 364 013, complicates our review of the application and has implications for future land division. It is about this issue that I wish to talk to you. Our department and the Planning Commission are currently accepting public comment on the site-specific amendment applications. The public comment period will conclude at the end of the Planning Commission public hearing on August 20. Therefore,there is some urgency to the matter. Regards, Josh D. Peters Associate Planner, Long-Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 Direct: (360) 379-4466, Main: (360) 379-4450, Fax: (360) 379-4473 Email:jpeters@co.jefferson.wa.us Web: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1 Map Output Page 1 of 1 2 parcels (15.99 & 22.56 acres); total w/out SR 19 is 38.55 acres x31361011 ._____._, .„. i €013E1004 913136,016 901261012 121312 I i rf Legend 9(31364X337 1 , E Pa1 ! #i H-.- ry " . 901364013 001364012 , 021313001 9011 } ', `.E S4 \ i j 9213i3003 9X31364063 90136x4604 \. , �s2139 N` 1 ,__... deiiiiitazo 02131 9213130 Mats prc nidadtri JeReesa,caryccrialSeniaesGIS 1 0 Nalitii===708 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Aug 06 14:16:53 2003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/6/2003 22/05/2003 18:54 0045-75954323 SIDE 01/01 (A--\ II Oi [(1) Ane Forests of Puget.Sound J v d o Sena Nymark Stallerupvej 43 A MAY 2 2 2003 7000 Fredericia,Denmark JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Jefferson County May 22. 2003 Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 USA Thank you for your invitation to attend the meeting with the Jefferson County Planning Commission Wednesday June 4,2003. I am sorry not to be able to attend the meeting as 1 am in Denmark.I plan to be in Port Lodlow late August 2003. Sincerely Seiii Nymark • 7,9X 00/ 36a .3r'y • • �gSON ° JEFFERSON COUNTY VA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti 0c 621 Sheridan Street S,�NG,00 Port Townsend, WA 98368 January 24, 2003 Al Scalf, Director A N E Forests Puget Sound Inc. GO Woodland Management Inc. Attn: Som Nymark 5285 SW Meadlow Road,St 468 Lake Oswego OR 97035-5298 Re: APN 921313001 within Section 31,Township 29 North,Range 1 East,WM Dear Mr.Nymark: Several weeks ago you visited this office and asked if the above-described parcel could be divided so that the 20.03-acre parcel(west 1/2 NE SW)could become a separate parcel. According to the Jefferson County Assessor's records,in 1982 the parcels(Gov't Lot 3 and the West 1/2 of the NE SW)were consolidated for tax purposes only. Consequently,upon adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map(August 28, 1998)the parcel was designated as Rural Forest Lands(RF:40). It is the determination of this department that had the parcels not been consolidated in 1982 for tax purposes,a comp plan designated of RR 1:20 may have been assigned. Therefore,based on the above,it is this departments determination that the parcel be segregated as: Gov't Lot 3(40.68 acres) and West%2 NE SW(20.03 acres)within Section 31,Township 29 North,Range 1 East. I will forward a copy of this letter to the Jefferson County Assessor and request that separate parcel numbers be assigned to each parcel. Should you have any questions or concerns,I can be reached at 360-379-4457 or email at mfarfan@jefferson.co.wa.us. Sincerely, - Miche le Farfan Associate Planner Enclosure C: Sherrie Shold,Jefferson County Assessor's Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 ilk _ ' 5285 S.W.Meadows Road,Suite 468 0 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 A (503)684-4004 0 FAX(503)684-4005 0 woodland@woodlandmgmt.corn MANAGEMENT INC. Professional Foresters I') E C E I VED Josh D. Peters AUG 18 2003 Associate Planner,Long Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Communittee Development NOSH ENVY 1 Jy D 621 Sheridan Street, �i LU1� 11 bti Port Townsend WA 98368 Dear Josh, This is a letter to be filed in the public records concerning MLAO3 189. This letter concerns our telephone conversation on Aug 12, 2003. Last January the owner of ANE Forests of Puget Sound Inc. inquired at the assessors office about the 40 acres that he owns Gov lot 1 Sec 36, T29N R1 W. He asked what would be the cost of separating his tax lot into smaller lots? He was told that there would be a charge of$3,000 for each lot that was created. He then asked them about the fact that the state highway already divided the ownership into two parcels. They told him that he could divide the property at the state highway and there would be no charge. If at some later date he was given permission to further subdivide the property that the lot lines could be adjusted to fit a different shape. Based upon this information he decided to divide the property at the state highway and thus save the cost of dividing one of the lots. He still owns both lots and if the Planning Commission allows him to develop the lots he will make a lot line adjustment to reorient the lots in an east west direction across both tax lots. The final results will not change from what was submitted in the plan,there will only be homes on the east side of the road and the valley to the west will remain undeveloped. There will only be one road that enters the state highway from the east. I apologize for the confusion that the two tax lots have caused. When I filed the permit I did not realize the owner had made the above changes. If I had known I would have changed the application to reflect the fact that we were dealing with two tax lots, however our plan would not change and the outcome will be the same regardless of the number of tax lots that we started with. I hope you can overlook my error. Thank you for considering our proposal. Sincerely, _,,mow James Wick Agent for ANE Forests of Puget Sound Inc. Ceiebrating 50 nears of forest stewardship 1953 —2003 435-- Alt cz\ ez )- 'J ' 5285 S.W.Meadows Road,Suite 468 O Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 (503)684-4004 O FAX(503)684-4005 O woodland©woodlandmgmt.com MANAGEMENT INC. Professional Foresters I•\ E C I V E D Josh D. Peters AUG 18 2003 Associate Planner,Long Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Communittee Development JEFFEIISON ENVY B 621 Sheridan Street, �tU L�Iit11t! 11 Port Townsend WA 98368 Dear Josh, This is a letter to be filed in the public records concerning MLAO3 189. This letter concerns our telephone conversation on Aug 12,2003. Last January the owner of ANE Forests of Puget Sound Inc. inquired at the assessors office about the 40 acres that he owns Gov lot 1 Sec 36, T29N R1 W. He asked what would be the cost of separating his tax lot into smaller lots? He was told that there would be a charge of$3,000 for each lot that was created. He then asked them about the fact that the state highway already divided the ownership into two parcels. They told him that he could divide the property at the state highway and there would be no charge. If at some later date he was given permission to further subdivide the property that the lot lines could be adjusted to fit a different shape. Based upon this information he decided to divide the property at the state highway and thus save the cost of dividing one of the lots. He still owns both lots and if the Planning Commission allows him to develop the lots he will make a lot line adjustment to reorient the lots in an east west direction across both tax lots. The final results will not change from what was submitted in the plan,there will only be homes on the east side of the road and the valley to the west will remain undeveloped. There will only be one road that enters the state highway from the east. I apologize for the confusion that the two tax lots have caused. When I filed the permit I did not realize the owner had made the above changes. If I had known I would have changed the application to reflect the fact that we were dealing with two tax lots,however our plan would not change and the outcome will be the same regardless of the number of tax lots that we started with. I hope you can overlook my error. Thank you for considering our proposal. Sincerely, 4- t ;;t, James Wick Agent for ANE Forests of Puget Sound Inc. Celebrating 50 years of forest stewardship 1953 - 2003 JEFFERSON COUNTY w4`SoN °°rte DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ww , ti - � 621 Sheridan Street $. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director January 27,2003 A N E Forests Puget Sound Inc. C/O Woodland Management Inc. Attn: Sorn Nymark 5285 SW Meadlow Road,St 468 Lake Oswego OR 97035-5298 Re: APN 901364012 within Section 36,Township 29 North,Range 1 West,WM Dear Mr.Nymark: Several weeks ago you visited this office and asked if the above-described parcel could be considered two separate parcels due to Beaver Valley Road(SR 19)dividing the property. RCW 58.17 requires regulation of the division of land and was passed in 1969. If a property owner chooses to subdivide property over a public road right-of-way,the property is considered as one parcel provided the parcel was created after 1969. According to the Jefferson County Assessor's records the parcel is a subdivision of the original quarter quarter section that has been in existence prior to the 1900's. According to the Jefferson County Department of Public Works,all portions of Beaver Valley Road were established prior to 1915. Based on the above findings,parcel 901353012 is considered two separate parcels due to Beaver Valley Road dividing it. You will need to contact the Jefferson County Assessor's to see what might be needed from you to segregate the parcels. For your convenience,a copy of this letter will be forwarded to Sherrie Shold of the Assessor's Office. If you have any questions or concerns,please contact me at 360-379-4457. Sincerely, , , , `Ill ichelle Farfan Associate Planner C: Sherrie Shold,Jefferson County Assessor's Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 , 17:30 3603859197 JEFF CO ASSESSOR PAGE 01/01 AriA i _Z 4:t9o., tbi:i OFFICE OF TAE � ' JEFFERSON COUNT ASSESSOR Jack Westerman III, A$sessor l • M E. .1'VI O TO: Michelle Farfan,DCD I FROM: . Sherrie Shold, Jefferson Co41 ty Assessor's Office D I anu 24 2003 1 • i 0'Y0 er tirl:;?-:7"'*, _1:,:47'!"°--_''1-1,_1_-_-_-_ ";.,41',.:4,,:' RE: #901364012 /�Nsnt!�: c�u5 ; Message: Parcel#901364012,NESE was in existence prior to 1 62. This sub-division is an original quarter—quarter division of Section 36. It w uld be safe to say,it has been in existence prior to 1900's. 1 1 If you should have any other questions,please don't h4sitate to call. 1 1 I i I I , I I 1 I P.O. Box 1220, 1820 Jefferson Street,Port To4rnsend, WA 98368-0920 (360)385-9105 1-800-831-2678 F4X(360)385-9197 1 Josh Peters From: Josh Peters Sent: Tuesday, December 09,2003 10:28 AM To: 'skip @ eco-land.com; 'pennycreek@olympus.net'; 'woodland @woodlandmgmt.com; 'bill©nwboatschool.org' Cc: Cheryl Halvorson;Al Scalf; David Goldsmith; Doug Peters (E-mail)'; David Alvarez Subject: 2003 Comp Plan amendment cycle update Greetings Comprehensive Plan amendment applicants and/or representatives: The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)took action on five proposals on the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket on Monday, December 1. All three of the site-specific applications were approved by the BOCC. Two of the proposals (Phillips/Maki and ANE Forests)were approved with conditions. On Monday, December 8, the BOCC discussed and approved two ordinances that will formally adopt Comprehensive Plan amendments. A legal notice is scheduled to appear in the December 17 edition of the Port Townsend&Jefferson County Leader newspaper. The date of publication for the legal notice will initiate a 60-day appeal period. The decisions are presumed valid and are effective December 8. When PDF versions of the adopting ordinances are available,they will be posted on the 2003 Amendment Cycle web page: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/2003%20Com prehensive%20Plan%20Amendment%20Cycle.htm. Should you have any questions, please be in touch. Regards, Josh D. Peters Associate Planner, Long-Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 Direct: (360)379-4466, Main: (360)379-4450, Fax: (360)379-4473 Email:jpeters @co.jefferson.wa.us Web: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1 Josh Peters From: Josh Peters Sent: Thursday, November 13,2003 2:47 PM To: 'skip Ceco-land.com; 'pennycreek©olympus.net; 'woodland @woodlandmgmt.com; 'bill @ nwboatschool.org' Cc: Cheryl Halvorson;Al Scalf; David Goldsmith; Doug Peters (E-mail) Greetings Comprehensive Plan amendment applicants and/or representatives: The Planning Commission recommendations for the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket have been forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners(BOCC),who have scheduled a public hearing on the proposals for Monday, November 24 at 11:15 in the BOCC Chambers at the Courthouse. For more information on the 2003 Amendment Cycle, including the Planning Commission recommendations and the legal notice for the November 24 hearing, please visit this page: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/2003%20Comprehensive% 20PIan%20Amendment%20Cycle.htm. Documents are posted under the"Documents"section. Your attendance at the November 24 hearing is optional. You may also comment in writing prior to or at the hearing, if you so choose. Comments can be mailed to the address below or emailed to<planning @co.jefferson.wa.us>. The BOCC is expected to deliberate and make decisions on each of the proposals under consideration on the 2003 Docket on either the first or second Monday of December. The BOCC agenda are posted here: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commissioners/default.htm. Results will be posted on the webpage linked above. Should you have any questions, please be in touch. Regards, Josh D. Peters Associate Planner, Long-Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 Direct: (360)379-4466, Main: (360)379-4450, Fax: (360) 379-4473 Email:jpeters@co.jefferson.wa.us Web: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Action DCD t 1C Item Commission 1. CPA Application Deadline May 1st 2. DCD Compiles Preliminary Docket, Mid May Available for Public Review 3. Optional PC&BoCC Joint Workshop Early June Early June to hear from proponents 4. DCD Transmittal to OCD 60 Days Prior to BoCC Adoption 5. DCD Report and Recommendation on Late May Preliminary Docket, Submits to PC 6. PC Public Hearing on Preliminary Late June Docket- Begin Deliberations 7. PC Report and Recommendation to Late June the BoCC on the Preliminary Docket 8. BoCC Reviews and Considers PC Report and Recommendation on the Early July Preliminary Docket 9. BoCC Adoption of Final Docket, as Recommended by the PC, or Public Early July Hearing to Make Revisions 10. BoCC Public Hearing on Final Docket Late July 11. DCD Staff Report on Final Docket, Early August including SEPA [OVER] 12. PC Public Hearing on CP Mid August Amendments - Begin Deliberations 13. PC Findings and Recommendation to Late September the BoCC on CP Amendments 14. BoCC Reviews and Considers PC Early October Findings and Recommendation on the Final Docket 15. BoCC Adoption of Final CPA's, as Early November Recommended by PC, or Public Hearing to Make Revisions 16. BoCC Findings and Decision on Final Early December CPA's 17. DCD Transmittal to OCD 10 Days After Final Adoption Acronym Key CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendment DCD Jefferson County Department of Community Development OCD Washington State Office of Community Development PC Planning Commission BoCC Board of County Commissioners SEPA State Environmental Policy Act [END] + 1 !f jj y .. . A > JEFFERSON COUNTY V DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN h1 i - ' �� APR 1 0 2CA3 16 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend• Washington 983 i �S OS 360/379-4450 . 800/831-2678 . 360/379-4451 Fax 1____--— �17N DEPT. OF JCEiOFMER .giv T C)O UNTY Nr_ttN f Application for Formal Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment' MLA# ,(I403-- IV PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: ANE Forests of Puget Sound Applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community development by May 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during this year's amendment process. Completed applications that are received after May 1 will be placed on the docket for the following calendar year. Applications that are incomplete (i.e., that do not include all of the information required below) will be returned to the applicant. Please note that formal site-specific amendment applications requesting expansion of existing commercial areas are subject to a November 22, 2000 Growth Management Hearings Board decision which prohibits the County from expanding existing commercial areas. The County is currently appealing this decision to Superior Court. In the event that this appeal is unsuccessful, applications requesting commercial area expansion may not be acted upon. Submittal Requirements Y. A completed Master Land Use Application and SEPA Checklist (if applicable). Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2: A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 2. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee (as applicable), as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance, as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the following: a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred (500)feet of the site;and c. The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of the site. 6. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit B," a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s), if applicable. Applications for project-related formal site-specific redesignations must include plans, and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. _ e Please prepare and label as "Exhibit "C," a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within the general vicinity [i.e., within a three hundred (300)-foot radius]. The exhibit must depict topography, wetlands and buffers, easements and their purpose, and means of access to the site. The intent of the exhibit is to clearly illustrate the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. 1 See UDC Section 9A. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.10/9/2001 Page 1 8. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed. (Attach additional sheets,if necessary`.) To change the zoning from 1 dwelling per 20 acres to 1 dwelling per 10 acres, ECM 0 fahfat would be consistent with the zoning that already exists North along the Beaver Valley road. Also the property is currently being taxed at 28 time the value of forest land, and is taxed as if it were developable. 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is: Rural residential. 1 dwelling per 20 acres. 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is: Rural residential, 1 dwelling per 10 acreE 11. The current use of the site is: forestry 12. The proposed use of the site is: Rural residential 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required, please prepare and label as "Exhibit D," proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in"bill"format,with text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts (e.g., strikeouts). 14. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit E," a thorough explanation of how the proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals,if any,meet, conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? c. How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? d. Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental services)? f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals, policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? g. Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network,capital - facilities, utilities, parks,and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? h. Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? i. How is the subject parcel(s) physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development including,but not limited to the following: (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? j. Will the proposal,if adopted,create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties?If the answer is yes,how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole? SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.10/9/2001 Page 2 k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? I. If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County, and other applicable inter jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other local, state or federal laws? 15. The applicant hereby certifies that the statements contained in this application are true and provide an accurate representation of the proposed amendment; and the applicant(s) hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. 0 //e- ^ 7/2'003 PA S SIGNATURE °F[y'&.'/'J of/ "at f DATE , PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures, representative authorization is required if application is not signed by the owner.] 4 Ui j1 APR 1 0 200'3 l "F JEFFtRS( it (,OUN Y SITE SPECIFIC APPAOC RE41 Page 3 4.11M1111 f „ L. ••• rz, " 7 A .. , �`'gSON c�� JEFFERSON COUNTY ' .j l �' ' �i:= '% `-J _':' r `�` i ti DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME 1 0 1 �� ' ' 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 �Q,`VO 360/379-4450 • 800/831-2678 • 360/379-4451 Fax JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal _ or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: ANE Forests of Puget Sound, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Jim Wick C/O Woodland Management Inc. 5285 SW Meadows Rd Suite 468 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 4. Date checklist prepared: 1/24/03 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable) Start July 2003 with surveying and road building. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page I 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. alliTlete Mk be the sale of one or two larger lots to the east. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No application pending 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Permits would be needed for the building of 4 homes, including septic, driveways, and providing power to sites. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) We would be subdividing 40 acres into 4 separate parcels. Orientation will be east and west crossing the Beaver highway. The access road and building sites will be on the east side of the highway, thus protecting wet areas west of the road. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Property is located NE 1/4 SE 1/4 (Gov lot 1) Sec 36 T29N R 1W on both sides of Beaver Valley Road. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Fla roNin hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,other. This site is flat on the west and starts getting steeper on the east side of the paved road. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 • � J4 b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? APR 1 0 Steepest slope would be approximately 30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay, sand,grt ; ' +� i OUPJTY If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any �� � �• :`�' ITY OEVElO'��rtENT The west side is a peat area and to the east as the ground rises it _.._ becomes more sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is no grading or filling except for the normal road building and excavation at the home sites. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No, other sites developed on the same slopes north of the site are stable. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Less then 2% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: None a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust, automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be minimal emissions during and after the construction and would mainly be limited to home owner's automobiles. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol emissions or other impacts to air, if any: -- 3. Water NONE a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. There is a intermittent stream on the North edge of the property. The west edge of the property is wet as it approaches the east fork of the Chimicum creek. There would be no development done West of the Beaver Valley road. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 • • • 2)'VYII the Oroject require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No, except for the access road which will leave Beaver Valley road 75 feet South of the intermittent stream. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. The water for the 4 home sites will need to be provided from deep wells. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Domestic Sewage will be needed for the 4 home sites. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Homes will be built on high ground away from the streams, so runoff will be of no signifacance. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The road construction will include cross drainage onto forest soils and would not go into the streams. Runoff from houses will be very minimal and would not be near the streams. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 .,r. ` I r i Ls l) ' 'i j r pi, 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: APR 1 0 2003 X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X ,I�r, �S{,', C; �iN1Y l evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine,other ; DCPT L L�t.v�,,,_,,,;ti Jc�'LL)rrJ�EN-I_ X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Removal of small trees and brush. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There would be the use of native plants except for the use of ornamental plants around the homes and the lawns. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: haw heron, eagleLongbirds other: mamma s: Si:, bear, elk, beaver,other: fish: bass,sa mon,trout, herring, shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: We would not have development near wet areas on the west side of the site. 6. Energy and natural resources _ a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity would need to be accessable to the building sites. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, ? '% ger erally.describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation,other)? There is already a considerable amount of traffic noise from Beaver Valley road, additional noise will be of no consequence. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There would be the normal home construction noise from approxiametly 7am to 5pm. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and shoreline use = a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? North of the site there are small rural home sites. West of the site there are home sites on marginal agricultural ground and east of the site in forestland. This site is currently being used as forestland. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 1 p y kS} l�i iS c. Describe any structures on the site. O ;`, None dd u y 1 i APR 1 0 2003 i i SI j FFERS, , 1idTY d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? opy, DEVELOPMENT No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural Residential with 1 dwelling unit per 20 acres f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural Residential with 1 dwelling unit per 20 acres g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Plan is for 4 families, to reside in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: There would be no development west of Beaver Valley road and a 200 foot set back from the property to the east. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,or low- income housing. There would be 4 middle income houses. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 10. Aesthetics What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Height would be 35 feet with a wood exterior b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting would be mostly evening lights above Beaver Valley Road. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is fishing, hunting and boating the the area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for, national, state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 • ( 1. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Beaver Valley road serves this site, and the access road will be east of Beaver Valley road and 75 feet South of the small intermittent stream. Y i;Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the a IY y p approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not to our knowledge c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. We can only estimate 20 to 30 sparatic trips per day for all 4 sites. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be increased public service for the 4 new homes. —_ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 ( (t 16. Utilities Li APR 1 0 a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water, reft9se serv► , IN1Y telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. E �. �� O:Q.,;tl ;ry 0�v auPNI,-N r Currently there is none at the site, but there is electricity, refuse served telephone available along Beaver Valley Road. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. There will be a need for electricity, well water, telephone and septic. C. SIGNATURE C� The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. ac Signature: Date Submitted: 3 2 " 03 SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 SON 0 • JEFFERSON COUNTY _ , , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i'j `"__��?_ l �_ €_ 'ti 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 gs G`cs0 360/379-4450•800/831-2678•360/379-4451 Fax APR 1 0 2003 4,, N www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment I° Master Land Use Permit Application Form DEPT• JEFFERSON COUNTY OF CO!'i.,1€0 iTv OEVEL 'rA-PiI PROPERTY INFORMATION _' W —" Tax Parcel Number: ® 0 © © ® © d Subdivision Name: Lot Number: Property Size: 40 (acres/square feet) Existing Use of Property: Forestry Site Address and/or Directions to Property: NESE (Gov Lot 1) Sec 36 T 29 N R 1 W APPLICANT&OWNER UNFORMATION Applicant(if applicable): ANE Forests of Puget Sound ,Inc. Telephone: 503-684-4004 Address: C/O Woodland Management Inc. 5285 SW Meadows. Rd. Suite 468 City: Lake Oswego State: OR Zip Code: 97035 Email AddressTJoodland @Woodlandmgmt, Applicant's Signature: '. 6 C , cc Property Owner(s)of Record: ANE Forests of Puget Sound-Inc 503-684-4004 Address: same as above City: State: Zip Code: Email Address I acknowledge that the applicant above i yin r a building permit on my property. '' /7/1,67-0e6117."OF Owner's Signature. + - /441—/-g7 car.e/,0 " I hereby designate Jim W• of Woodland Mgmt Into act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). /mei-A2,t- :/// d/' __/ , c t'i e rCz4 '/iI'C. (PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE) (DATE) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as necessary) To subdivide site into 4 building sites. [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements.An asterisk(*) indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. Type I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 (OVER) Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1= ❑ Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat, Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 ❑ Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) ❑ Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.2 SEPA 8.10.12(b) Type Ill Permits ❑ Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat, Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) ❑ Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development, Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.3 SEPA 8.10.12(c) Type IV Permits ❑ Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 ❑ PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.13 Type V Permits ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 ❑ Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 ❑ Appeal of SEPA UDC Section 8.10.12(d) Other Local,State or Federal Permits ❑ Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED] By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property.Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. 1. PROPERTY OWNER (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the"Endangered Species Act" or"ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual, group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. 2. PROPERTY OWNER (DATE) r z. rx y t 3� m ka r,-+IA a 6•� } i W 4.45— ►-✓t L /✓ '�lva.J ."?.:r �!xx..:yz . ¢ —°• 'rS'u'`�' b °� 7g ..5 z L•o =9 e S 'J•i Ery a .; ..� ter s z � s;? c?t . °"z ,tr s,5 �kro hit t,,.s. 4'.� t�t,,lE•.t�'8� y.���"�� ;Yt�r G,+,'� ,�,.•,, � "as4�� t ik3R,5R,t >�r' '�'.`�,��trm� �"F . AIDA r-�,'N' t7 0�' t w �n Y 8„ ,-' t& 6's m. 3k ._•,,•'::`,;'',i,:1;:-;-.,.i..."..„' , p ',,,,aA:a` ,"• f m4, ,s• .F a tb t t;xr ,�? <, x ?3 ur Nb$tf-L` ,n F' Ff.: ,. k f "x S '^" 3 ; JC 4a HA %..O h9'r9 '✓ '3,,� d Cs, ; '' `s> ,,,,, x 7 " . e#, s'1 ,F " 4,kt 1410��' i+k' #'� yy. m <r� . 4�f yy�y ,,�j, �,. c0 r5.*: ?l ��?.�` yY t , x,'-` RyY t;` l �$'?.�:£k v{T *"'' :? c,- ,• ::ak.,h ,,ky'�r4.,tN"4'..• �Q k e%' ,Y `i� R1 • "• !' �.=:t €� ,�; t, ` i ti r r .z 1 .}dig"w? 1{i #' S, a t. F F * Ns rr,,. 4R` - ' �.raAa« • %t s a � '•-iar �'' !�+ 'w Ar", �...}y u�' ew°a. If:d 'i ,�. � {�,## r<: "'��� �a � ��� 7�H ors °"� xarvp� ^�"�y r tt�r�r' #.. �r4�.wa:,r•�,t �r�+' ..� '� �.0 saw+ .t.- ' �'ak„�t+ie air � .t _,,,,..,7,r, s 3s�4 t�, . •rR s a uk�- ' �'° 1 � ' '4 • � ,• % .a,� -� � i � y?tt���, �q tH'� $!', s7, �,,g. sue.”. d �S t iv. d .,hid, y �1e y h ., ' c Y ,q� d, :`tb5vra,' • ,' . ' ei40." 4,''',34Pry `Fr . i .A.—:. -'04-ti-tig:i=11 , -,,,,,A4-;',!,:= .:4,ir-,;,i R ` s; .. x E '� ' "7 .�_ '�- L i , Y ..:_t 1 ,7 sue' „ sit t4,41,$ .� 7 .+s a Y f ' ff r ,� io, z 3 i� 35, Yxrf?7tat ac .a�s,..,..„...„,,,,,.„..".,. :..„...,... .. . .. .. '. 4 Y AS R-. i, ' , e `.„,,„,,.--iit,-,_.--:,-,.A ., 4;43;4'::2-,:,,ii,.::d:, ' , . -'..•-0,0; ''',- .,. j w7 f �” Dph. . G r ,tr... s a r ' x4 t J i ,:.t.:F..:.:.--- :-...,...gt,...,-.i.mall . - 01/.?�' ?za•� tae W°� �.�` � • t Sr i'<B%� p ? .. p•t ti � yl. w.f�••S'�'.��a d � .. r+ ,D s#�• �fD�SS tLA L•�.'q� J ^2 C3 4S�iwa 11, .�„r 3s -j;- .` ss 3 F p"uy+ d' 4 r'i _ .. . . ....a.,-,-.7:„ . ' ' , . , . 00:.ti.c",.-,,,,, .i.i , --,,y47, ..,:... wit...-.,-:. ,-- -,!,-..--5,-„7:-.;:„....4.*,,,,ifititicilv,;,4,,,,Irm.. . ,..,,' ,4001..olar , : -.1,1":„,:‘, .1 ..,:iyn x Ai. 0 . '.. .:.'''.7:.. . :It•,..,,....,44,iv=0:::•:'..',,..?,:', ,,c4.... ,..-;1'74, -Mril'riii,* , , ' . - livre.,,.: ' - , .''.,-;,. i..,,,........,,,,,,,„,...,...._.,--..:,,,,,-_-_--.. --,-...-.;,]-:."--,,,,--;',-,... .:.-;,,,,-,.;v:v4=;,,,„- .,,,:iv,,..,,,,i..,,,::, . , .. . -4,,v,,_,,,,,e,,-., ,;.- ,,,,, a , , , , , a A s ? v . r ` T4 4k �k t ev. 6-..i. '1 3 !.. . Q,� r /?:-.7" Q ! (//,' r/ "Exhibit B" It is our intent to change from 1 dwelling per 20 acres to 1 dwelling per 10 acres. Our site is located on both sides of Beaver Valley Road (NE 1/4 SE 1/4 (Gov lot 1) Sec 36 T 29 N R 1 W). In reviewing this area, dividing into 4 parcels of 10 acres would be consistent with adjacent properties as the adjacent properties to the North, on the East side of the road are currently zoned Rural Residential 1 dwelling per 10 acres. This would also be consistent with the zones 3/4 miles South of the property East of the Beaver Valley road. In completing this project we would be asking to add 2 extra homes sites to the 2 that are already allowed. In doing this there would be minimal if any real impact on Beaver valley road. We would be placing our access road east of Beaver Valley road and 75 feet from a small intermittent stream. The building of these roads would include cross drainage onto forest soils with no chance of drainage into the streams. The traffic to Beaver Valley road by this access road would be slight if even noticeable. The building sites would be placed on high ground with the need to remove only a minimal amount of small trees and underbrush, still leaving the houses fairly isolated from the road and the valley intact. There fore not having much of an impact if any on people passing by. Currently the property has had a few deer and a occasional hawk, but mostly we have songbirds. By locating the houses on the East side of the site and leaving the west side of the valley intact we feel that we would not be disturbing their habitat. Our plan is to leave most of the natural vegetation and would expect to have a few ornamental plants close to the home site surrounding a lawn area. Electrical utilities are currently along Beaver Valley road but not connected to the site. Connecting these to the site would be of minimal impact especially since they are already at the entrance to our site. The remaining utilities would be septic and well water which should have no impact to the surrounding areas. There would be a need to increase public service either way we look at this, but by adding 2 extra sites it would not put a strain or a heavy burden on any of the public services. If anything it could bring extra revenue to the community. Our goal is to have 4 quality building sites that will enhance the area and allow 4 families the ability to grow in a positive rural environment. In doing so there is a benefit to the county and the community in that the lower valley would be intact and at the same time increase the value on the land and bring income to the community. 6::/ U AFR 1 0_ axe Liq ? 9 JEFFFR ,C ■1Y DEBT. CFCG., r YfHof1_� t eh .r c t 3 FOREST PRAT \../ E BASE YAP ( . TOWNSH I P 29 NORTH , RANGE 01 WEST ( W . M . ) , SE -C T ION. 3-6_,,. . APPLICATION # " )J� ' �� -� `' APR 1 0 2003 1, i 1 / ■ _ —_I 11 " AL , fac, • iir It/ / _ __._ _ __Nov- j L. -ill KU 531585 531586 4 1 all f / / 4 Ailli 1 inittel---. , ..,_ _. 0. \,.._ „ . ( _ k n tip•-'-r- --41 WA i 1 i \). ')Et3 ', El is A r G 530• iiiilltri 530426 aVER1• j ` �` J // ,` 11`\ 52"265 X00 529266 529267 SCALE 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 FEET 1 Mie �szeo to MAP DATE: November 15, 2000 CONTOUR INTERVAL : 40 Feet LEGEND : See Instructions NAD 27 DISCLAIMER : See Legend Water/Wetlands including their location and class may be incorrectly displayed or not shown on the Base Map. Applicants are responsible for verification and correction of all streams. wetlands, and possible water courses. I i i ■ e 04 Frij C) m -D I. K rn• f co _. �, xz ° = E m c) VT11 I ra O •° z C Z °� 0 m O D z`2`y??rr ! ! ihU v z x acv D y D (7-( I r Pi a <Z 8 z m a C s s Z o v A � y y I m > Z M r y:>. B ` � 4 ° s< $ � z _ p D k ' .4 a s i s �" u) A 7 y � r vv • z � � N�U c �iy -c 8.4' 8." m °rz U N .•.. m v to 0 $ ! ga O A -{ N •.:- 8 x° �! R i o z S C h :jr't og $ m ` ::x g x 4 (SW 1/4 36-29N-1W) jNOjW O, -iN P _t 88 g; E W :<,,,,,t,',/92.93 wA�o A rob P-ice$' W co IC \ P P'"OON "��O co O'o o 1 Ito • wP c 0 � m A i 1 ° o mom I o I\ �- \\\ r C0 \4, c � --CN N a i E x \ D 383.93 G $ g rn 0 0 v PQ co g1xW iy- G f4'^O j 8 g - - m D ' Z 1. x CI • — 30611/41/O uv • ---_ . }133 r • Pi '� ivnoYiy/yo o r•a 2 -- —._/ 476.28 m Z 847.51 co 1 i A f V` r 1 N co r. r Z w vnco r- r- ,. mo r v� °°c,rnmrn ° oo $ r . �` U m-r,co • 4 r 4,rn � � – Cl O ,\dl\ �,,.''''` r- \ / Z co Z 1- omg i` f flow r If 1� I m a) �� �C O o o � osFo � �\ P^ N r // Jt P 1"; , v 1\ '-- •''' / cr O ` 1'■ . ' , (SW 1/4 31-29N-1E) ~ • o `70 --I (1) (n w f T1 G7 M W j N N Q -r V) , n --I N .a"P W (. N Y W w i s O ° b b U W N N • N+ N ra 1 M �;.`,. �_ 4.r�. L-- � �� "Exhibit E" A) Major circumstances have not changed in relation to the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive plan. B) We think that the comprehensive plan is still valid and that this change can fit into the existing plan. C) The proposed amendment would enhance the visual appeal without deflecting from the rural aspect. It would bring an increase in property value and add income to the community. Also bringing this area into the same zoning as those properties to the north. D) If your talking public transportation,there is none alone Beaver Valley Road, and so that would not be an issue. E) This proposal would not have a major effect on the level of service for public facilities, if anything I think it would bring a increase in revenue to these services, giving them an opportunity to advance. F) Yes. We would be providing affordable living, bringing economic growth with out putting a strain on any public facilities or services. At the same time leaving wildlife habitat and still allowing the property to be productive. G) No. Adding two home sites would have a nominal impact if any impact at all. H) No. Again the impact would be nominal if any impact at all. I) By changing this property it would bring it consistent with surrounding properties and easily accessible by Beaver Valley Road. Utilities currently run along Beaver Valley Road, making connection to those utilities not an issue. J) This proposal if adopted would not add pressure to change other properties. We would become the same as the surrounding properties around us that are already listed with 1 home site per 10 acres. Which is what we are proposing. K) No, this is a very small change and does not materially change land use or growth projection. L) Adding 2 more dwellings to this site would not put a major if any impact on the availability of facilities or the services in the immediate area 1 0 2003 w . � ��� APR M) Yes. We would be consistent with adjacent properties and since there would be no development west of Beaver Valley Road and a 200 foot set back from the property to the east that would leave most of the natural landscape, and still be leaving the land compatible for the wildlife in the area. APR 1 0 2003 s � i JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT CF C` ,it ;iTY DEVELOPMENT Map Output ` Page 1 of 1 FEATURES NOT SURVEYED - 701 344 041 /ANE Forests of Puget Sound Legend • Shoreline Photos 11 Towns 0 cum*sue * Read custom 1,h,,+'' Road System L__J Paroals-H County Zoning , 601361007_r r . T(.601361009 C01361010 rr AG23, ;} 601 361 01 1 " ae�+ FOREST-ED III rrr rrrrr , 'i III///////////////)///////,///,///////).r!' CROSSROADS•cC Irr trr :rrrr r' r r`r 'r'r 000000220 ■ /rrr'r./r , 901361004 r rr`°r.rr 601361014':601361012 :si %+►< CR[%^sSROADSGC f'rr �'�,{ ri f`r CRGSSIR.GWD5•NC •'r r ■ GEN COVE LPG `rrrr r r 901361013 III HEAVY INDUSTRIAL is NNCIDiNGFCREST ® Ut IT INDUSTRIAL 6013640i0{ �J IdUTARYRESFRVATION / 601364007 ■ MPR.MULTFA ILY NV UPR-OPEN SPACE 601 36401 1--_ AIPR,RG'CF I ------ 601364012 601364012 + 1dPR•RECREAT1oN L1PRaINGtE FAN TRCTS 601364001 ■ IIPR-SNG-E FAMILY 601364006) I 0000000 ■ uPR•VILAGECENTER 601364001 •• ' l NATIONAL FOREST 7 ' rrrrrr't. ,:r: r/rr f r � ;: NATK7NAL REFUGE\ r /r r:'////7 . '/!rr r r r r+/ r rr'.r r r;%r•r�r rrr'r r r':r rr r/f r r`ri r, ,/./y..././ .r 6 013 6 4005 't .rt t t r / r r /rrr/ :r r r ,� 601364004 / 60136404 62G 1,31307 921313006 PARKS ADRECRE ATI N PORT TOwPSEND UGA III FRSTRES_RASED N6 II RURAL VILLAGE carrot ■ RURAL FOREST-40 ■ RURALRES.1-.10 11 f r 621313002 3002 7 r : ✓ /r 'r/ rr //'/1:///,..6213130;2 RURAL RES.1.Z Ma�sprQVidmd JaffaisoeCougi It // RURAL RES.1•5 UNKNOWN `*:. WAS i>=FACLITY 1�` NCH RESSIVATIDN \ OUINAULT RESERVATION III NATICNAL PARK FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Zoning information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made during the 1999 Comprehensive Plan amendment process.Zoning designations must be confirmed with the Department of Community Development. http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=parcels&ClientVersion=3.1&Form=True&Enc... 04/11/2003 ANE FORESTS OF PUGET SOUND, INC. 138 3 Vendor Id: JeffCo /Name: Jefferson County 1383 Remit# Project Ref Date Amount 257 Site Specific Comp 3/31/03 2,250.00 Check Date: 3/31/03 Check Amount: ***$2,250.00 � r r ::4-.1,%44.,"Isc4:u }. •..� ' . ., 1 r r !-"' I� r y • Y v,t t r. _y,ri,=}�4,�,6(�4°]s�t c>,., .. ..r-- -- j,,.......:..l:... L - [.•.. 1 rrl T,S ..)2. ';i.e..: 1.M. :•Y ti„i. ..'^... � .c... ;.. .......,:...re-= i • .,•.x t vi.:�,r,::.i p;:<5:...:w'�'�"+4.i ti7 '':r•.e'. ':r;t:x .�;8 s;=rr..;l:e=a�. :M �Sa��•ie' ,+�% ' r°d'a'l: °$ i+•�:��;;; tF�,y��:'. �..C.-',g. It�iiY!`4'••";i::." Yr�4• 'cti• x+.,W��•,}' ::{'s�'P• 1:�+,. �1 i:+,�t ��r*b�''�i . : e,� �y; � �"� � .^r .•W. .C,� c���.;iM .\";4 �•s,.� •,sy Irv.':,,:+�'i:�l; •1,• .� .'ig�•a.7r. .:�•Y%� i� �:; �.?}. � . =2 :�^' 1.r. 'el:114 : ^F..a ,' f :t.. ' ,5�.••rar,.a.. . s9;' .i ..i7 l.f{�":,7. :GG+a•� ? ' •+'1 N� � � ��w•. fS,'r� .� # ,l�.rk .t': + t �,��:: r� _ r-� - qtr>•`kS ��, ;.- yt: :.r".'t '.°%r.lr4.Yvih. ';", r. �` ,'�.,' �.�st: .,' c�'.. S ,. ,sL •"t, •0 r-> sr�#t..A� y?�:',.r!t�y+3:»'a •��'>vi'",ra`cSti' c•K.,'�:-e ;��� <<a .-,Ar .:3 ..�.��,.• .e �'.-` �-t:�. ^�spF"�;••,��.�•• .�A� �Y�as�-�`�,,j:.,4;.tv.:'°�{-�;;. --$'r,ste.%i\ A. i ''4,- ,.;',4t !P'7 k ,C g"i e,? ty. , x _..q i5,.,� F t.:-;` y. ,�{...x..._ ntif7;%r-:',..,-.ri`, ' ; `, ', ,.r . ,,,s-1,q,� _� x + �''•TX-x0y 'F -r'r4'-}�'h ,13 ,,I+„ ',a4,-..- "1W»s?• {ci �. s-y.A.,,' �-.g!.;y?cJf..t:.i=�:�.. 4"'71:� aj. yd r�'1��3E`eo x�F F�i"-'3' � ufv!i�,�rih".s.>,({.,: -T� t `1x�'��°', ",�`�i�f�7^ gati`�- .!'-� s'.:,,.?.. ,}i L 'i,' �, �'`. M�4 .S:Y."•.. fr • F `S �.,Y1' �� 1 `,��yy S � `~ L H .F'4 •'+,u••` y`3 .. r y r* <.I ., �,z, r=a , �ti3" . �+ Y x t a .•� ' ''''''.74.-:. Kv +i. ..+'!` :y 7a c<"�t1- s �,, 'r' ��•y.. � ,,.�b�'f �r j,rr� > . t°+•4 , ty Y r 4� '`.4''' F t rC .4_ ;.�. s. ie " WC�Ii "Saud o ritjdzed.r.1 ' 0/1 U'V; ''z' ,-, 1, i i ,s o r't,gV. -, •*0C .<r -.)::'-' 5,2,.2:, 4 'C', c} r 15 D�4 '' a :� t AdV00N 1 -,2 - ' ��r�.''x4 S�'� '�� 1 t ¢�F�"; J_- r t < �s ." ''''S`: ''Il : - � s z-;,, ' rI (�- t r � �• .j� c'.:v 'lr. #y 4 { ses-�f 4 -y rT , 'i '� r. `a'�, r �3t3 /'�3 < ' �k*'K `7 7 )4 - ' � - 3e ersoh Ctouiity ';;.1D .1Dept of Cointt unity evelopment. v , 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98268 '3P 0001, 383u■ -u: L2L00024fl1:4LS9 6L64 ..' '\ T� JEFFERSON COUNTY Lrt• No. 56010 DATE / /0103 RECEIVED FROM Am c- EU S r-PU5e,+ ` DESCRIPTION v BARS# AMOUNT CURRENCY COIN n C N (\�]'3 EC �h O Km 0 - «q - °° J � 50, a, C'Ole' '-'1,49 //64 0 ,r tied Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 901364012 Owner Mailing Address: A N E FORESTS PUGET SOUND INC WOODLAND MANAGEMENT INC 5285 SW MEADLOW RD ST 468 LAKE OSWEGO OR 970355298 Site Address: Section: 36 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SE1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 211 Mapped 40.08 Planning area: South Chimacum/Inland Acreage: Valleys/Center(6) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S36 T29 R1W NE SE (GOV LOT 1) E No Photo Available a No 2nd Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_N0=901364012 04/11/2003 • t CC CO I-1 CO = CO Cr LL '0 _Ct Li `.. U 0 H 0 d- -3 o O U CD _ C C Z CO O "0 — - Q ..0 O O L J x cc -0 0 4J O C U O N CI = a L LI O "0 ?_ O O CC O L L L U Q J, j U U Q Z o 0- Cl L) ` ` U I- I- o O 0) C.] U Z Z CD CD H 03 H CO "0 0) = 0 CI CU p U Z U co in Cr Z -O = Z CD I L1J = C = 3 O H VF' in 3 I— O Co O CO Cr) O CO U) J U O I- I- O 'CI CZ 1- Z co Imo- C O I— 1--1 LJJ LJJ CT) -- r-s W 3 CD X Cl X. } CV C9 = LL Cr I- CD = CO Cl CD Cr - CC O I- O- UJ UJ Q 3 O C w d' O J L1J Cn Z o w C1 CD J Cn CO CC I- Q J CD CO I- Q o Cn X C3 - CC 3 CD X \ CD L11 Q O (D CL O .4- O L1J Q CC Cr Cl LLI C1] 07 CC CD Cr h- O Z X uJ Ci J CV ,-. O LL LL Q 3 X C= CA LL I- J 3 O U W 10 CV X W 0 C.0 O c CC U I- LJJ I- CO J W O CA LLJ 0) 0. O Ln LL O CD O Co X Z 3 03 �G CD Cr) L11 Z 7 CL O 011 Q co co Z 4-1 \ U Q o\° Ln J Q CO - +I O CV O co o . o In ' 1- o co CO LIJ o Z Ln O Q CO . o L.0 o o ti o 0 0 13 L Ln O U CD CU O = # C O * CD C _ CD O ++ CD Z CD CD = CD -- = Q L CD U O CD "0 7 CO 0 C_ L D_ - O CO O- L O CO X •-• U -0 X CO CO Cl Co •- -- CO CD I- I- X Cl- I- Cn CO Y- * * H Q Map Output Page 1 of 1 Streams ' - 1-- 90`361011 901361011 I — a0ao0ar2o 901361004 901361014 901361012 921312002 I 901361013 ==,,, — 901364010? , Legend - 901364407 i71 Selected Features 1 Pamela-11 901364011-- Streams 901364012 901364012 921313001 .1 !" Tome 4/41. Typs 6 901364001 t% Type 4 901364006 1364401 000000220\ /4 f Type 3 90 i {_ 1J Type 2 / /1 Type 1 N 901364005 / Mar 921313003.---- 901364003 901364004 ','.921313007 494400320 921313002 921313002 Maas pmvided try Jarman cosily cenl-d Sm+icv GIS 01 1 \` 171611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Aug 05 10:41:30 2003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Landslide Hazard 941361010 "C : ;;''. 901361011 000000220 , w 1 901361004 901361014--901361012 921312007 901361013 901364010.E Legend 901364007 CI Selactad Features } Pamela-H 901364011---__ Landsade Hazard I 901364012 901364012 931313001 � : sift 901364001 aoderale 90194001 004o4422d ,.w 5i6M \941364006 . «iP y'! 921313003 9013640004 s_ a 901364004 \'.��971313007 000000720 921313002 921313007 Al M � Jelfa�o,cwn FyCenhdseriGlS 0 ORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Je County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Aug 05 10:42:21 2003 http://gisserver/sery let/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion-4 .0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Aquifer Recharge 1 1 901361010---I .s.\=, -", 941361011 \f0 OD 1004 00i361014 941361012 921312002 11 ill 901361013 901364010 Legend dd 0 Selected Features 94136904 ParCels44 CItical Aquifer Recf1arge 901364011 901364012 1364012 921313001 Areas 1 C 9IJ9C•IJNK IIII 1 941 1 SARPA 4 SUSc 901364006 susc 901364001 ■ SARPA . SARPA 4UNK ,901364008, 921313003 90/364003 901364004 y 921313007 ___ _ 1 000000�p 921313002 921313002 Maps prrnided try Jefferson Cerny Cai9-dSarvio=GIS ININWHIME716fi FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Aug 05 10:43:22 2003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Wildlife - - i I 901361010----1 901361011 .c3 ". 901361004 901361014 901361012 921312002 II -- 901361013 9013640161 Legend CISelected Features --r� 901364007 I I Pareg s H al Herttege Points 901364411--__-- 901364012 901364012 921313001 In Polarity Habitats and Species 901364001 901364006' 901364001 901364005, 921313003 901364003 I 941364004 N",.;921313047 ( � 00401 00220 921313002 921313002 '... Moo,prided by Jefferson Cos*Cedrd Se Hues GlS 0 EMINIMMI.Min 7160 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County s correctness or validity. Dat contained n this map is limited d herein and makes no by the method and accuracy of its respect Tue Aug 05 10:44:16 2003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Wetlands Iy -T 901361010---1 I 901361011 � =A", I — —4 —_ .ai-PM:4':; 11361014 901361012 921312002 901361013 L ''t� Legend 0 Selected Features Parcels-1i Ill wetlands 90 1. 11364012 901364012 921313001 rr; ::FF.' 000000220 ,j 1 `t 901364005 .,`•. 921313003 -, Y;n,,. \ 921313007 I -Allii2:2!122212"1223213 000000220 921313002 921313002 0 71611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. Tue Au• 05 10:40:32 2003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 JEFFERSON COUNTY 7 c-� NO. 56010 DATE / i°163 RECEIVED FROM M4I r * r '1 u e g DESCRIPTION BARS# AMOUNT CURRENCY COIN C ISZS EC G J �50, (j°�A03- IL Ill o 1)41 cile„,,, , ,„ .g11' - RECEIVED BY TOTAL /