Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZON2003-00020 ) 0* - Page 1 of 1 Cheryl Halvorson From: Randy Kline Sent: Tuesday,July 01,2003 11:05 AM To: Cheryl Halvorson; Erin Lundgren Subject: FW: PLC Comment Letter-Correcte Randy Kline,Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development Long-Range Planning Division (ph)360.379.4464 (fax)360.379.4473 http:www.cojefferson.wa.us -----Original Message----- From: Nancy Dorgan [mailto:ndorgan @waypoint.com] Sent:Tuesday,July 01, 2003 10:37 AM To: Randy Kline Subject: PLC Comment Letter-Corrected Randy, Would you please add the corrected copy(attached)to the record? Thanks. 7/1/03 1 People For A Liveable Community PO Box 667 Port Townsend,WA 98368 July 1,2003 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Re: MLA 03-232 Port of Port Townsend Commissioners: This amendment should not be docketed because it fails all docketing criteria(need,urgency,and appropriateness)and failed to meet application deadline requirements.The 4-inch application is still a very draft Airport Master Plan,not a proposed CP subarea plan. It does not include crucial CP narrative and UDC text for proposed building intensity at the proposed industrial park. The Port hasn't said,or doesn't know yet,what it wants to happen there and has essentially told the Planning Commission that the Port will use the long amendment process to fmish its application.However,under GMA mandate for early and continuous public participation and UDC Section 9 requirements,the time between docketing to adoption is intended for public review of complete applications. Need: There is no justification for 34 new acres of light industrial zoning,especially while light industrial acreage sits vacant in the Port Townsend UGA,unable to compete with cheaper rural development standards in recently expanded Glen Cove,Eastview,Brinnon,Hadlock,etc. Urgency: There is no FAA mandate for the County to rezone rural residential lands to accommodate an unspecified Port vision for its vacant parcels. The CP Airport policies refer to a review after completion of the Airport Master Plan,not before. Twin-track policy adoption for the County and Port is not CP consistent or urgent since the Port didn't fmish its Airport Master Plan before this amendment cycle. Appropriateness: This amendment is highly inappropriate and will result in an appeal. A light industrial park with non-aviation uses is not an essential public facility. Being adjacent to the airport is not justification for giving unrelated uses the same zoning. Such a dubious amendment would also fail because the County hasn't yet adopted an interjurisdictional EPF process with Port Townsend.The Port's request for a"mapping error"rezone of its pre-CP 10-acre parcel would be clearly erroneous by Hearing Board standards. The pen did not slip. There was no technical error,but rather a deliberate staff review and BOCC legislative decision to downzone the 1994 Airport Industrial zone because it did not have any built environment for CP LAMIRD designation. An EPF designation now is a faulty strategy that is GMA/CP inconsistent. Sincerely, Nancy Dorgan For People for a Liveable Community i . ,fie i r• j1A �� fr. s�r : -ar:" ■ b _ 4>t ''' Page 1 of 1 )1 q. 's, l Cheryl Halvorson From: Randy Kline Sent: Monday, June 30,2003 8:57 AM To: Cheryl Halvorson Subject: FW: PLC Comment re 2003 Docket-MLA 03-232 Randy Kline,Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development Long-Range Planning Division (ph)360.379.4464 (fax)360.379.4473 http:www.co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message----- From: Nancy Dorgan [mailto:ndorgan @waypoint.com] Sent: Sunday,June 29, 2003 1:07 PM To: Randy Kline Subject: PLC Comment re 2003 Docket- MLA 03-232 Randy, Please add the attached PLC letter to the public record for the BOCC docket hearing. Thanks, Nancy 6/30/03 People For A Liveable Community PO Box 667 Port Townsend,WA 98368 June 30,2003 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Re: MLA 03-232 Port of Port Townsend Commissioners: This amendment should not be docketed because it fails all docketing criteria(need,urgency,and appropriateness)and failed to meet application deadline requirements.The 4-inch application is still a l very draft Airport Master Plan,not a proposed CP subarea plan. It does not include crucial CP narrative and UDC text for proposed building intensity at the proposed industrial park. The Port hasn't said,or doesn't know yet,what it wants to happen there and has essentially told the Planning Commission that the Port will use the long amendment process to fmish its application.However,under GMA mandate for early and continuous public participation and UDC Section 9 requirements,the time between docketing to adoption is intended for public review of complete applications. Need: There is no justification for 34 new acres of light industrial zoning,especially while light industrial acreage sits vacant in the Port Townsend UGA,unable to compete with cheaper non-rural development standards in recently expanded Glen Cove,Eastview,Brinnon,Hadlock,etc. Urgency: There is no FAA mandate for the County to rezone rural residential lands to accommodate an unspecified Port vision for its vacant parcels.The CP Airport policies refer to a review after completion of the Airport Master Plan,not before. Twin-track policy adoption for the County and Port is not CP consistent or urgent since it the Port didn't fmish its Airport Master Plan before this amendment cycle. Appropriateness: This amendment is highly inappropriate and will result in an appeal. A light industrial park with non-aviation uses is not an essential public facility. Being adjacent to the airport is not justification for giving unrelated uses the same zoning. Such a dubious amendment would also fail because the County hasn't yet adopted an interjurisdictional EPF process with Port Townsend.The Port's request for a"mapping error"rezone of its pre-CP 10-acre parcel would be clearly erroneous by Hearing Board standards. The pen did not slip. There was no technical error,but rather a deliberate staff review and BOCC legislative decision to downzone the 1994 Airport Industrial zone because it did not have any built environment for CP LAMIRD designation. An EPF designation now is a faulty strategy that is GMA/CP inconsistent. Sincerely, Nancy Dorgan For People for a Liveable Community tot AR ''' i -19‘ ',. . CID ' - Ai ," , b «w _ CR.: VOX) caq't,103 Page 1 of 1 i b t, O Leslie Locke From: Glen Huntingford Sent: Sunday, June 22,2003 5:08 PM To: Leslie Locke Subject: FW: Letter to Commissioner Glen Huntingford From: pattyfw @aol.com[SMTP:PATTYFW@AOL.COM] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 5:08:17 PM To: Glen Huntingford Cc: nulife©olympus.net Subject: Letter to Commissioner Glen Huntingford Auto forwarded by a Rule Dear Commissioner Huntingford: As a concerned property owner in the proposed"noise overlay"area of Port of Port Townsend, I request you as my representative, allow the application provided by the PRQ to amend language in the comprehensive land use plan to go forward and be docketed for hearing. I support eliminating any reference to"noise overlay"in the ordinance as I perceive it to be a taking of property rights issue. Your consideration in this matter is appreciated. Respectfully yours, Patricia F. Widrig(owner of Irondale property) 7814 Warren Drive N.W. Gig Harbor, WA 98335 6/23/2003 t: • jai (;/•lUt a/ • ! SSE & CO.MpA� ` < tai �> _l t . 4 lib to �, IR �O4 SAILMAKERS stS$' ... OWNSEND. 1 7.00.. l'o're Hudson Hatbos JEFFERSON Cup l BOARD OF COMMISSfO FPc OUR_ Ccu 4 .,a,.,0 J u Govt 50 / 21 , AL (.44 w 0 u ,L._ s- us Vv(-I-o C 't,o plc,, - y -ro cur uC Aou,T -11A-v. NO Z 0 1:>b<2:1-- ( ,is.e v 04, L i F- ►Ivry 't -t')-+'sx- - Is osLe,.,) t Fes- . C c -� L. Fliu A- 4 AR r -n-h5 &MnnA N rry ° 6,42 nns -r - Le—A LO C,s . ' - C4N) eYe "5.NeAps &7 tS 'Vero- L. & t \l T 1t�y D 4 N(0- Co vm n 154∎41-4 2 0/(A9401J ,,, CAJ Port Townsend Sails,Inc. 315 Jackson,Port Townsend,WA.98368 (360)385-1640 Fax(360)385-0476 email:ptsails@olympus.net Recycled Paper KtoV Z0_93 I D DM MA - W () ct L7 ) 1N T c25ty N l to WNS SAi L AN,04e ,tip. eztvt y R, Its b Pr; �-N /J� p-r; 1-k1,,,0,,N - Z cacz6, Mti Pilmituv_4_ 1 DWNL .Q. Lo M I Nt Co ul N r y Jane Ia(o 44 &7 b 2 RA,A0) i�-IAn' .l I�/�-� f))14 t L /.'7 -nrvet_v a4 Li! .x- ye-Ap..s V (--4 e 1n I, 12.0,v, 01- L..\v 1lT A N &- LECa L-r w �l l N la i 5 t m,E 'VvA2 MY e)9N1 vv.,06 RN aAfie) Iv�Y P M CAA -0 L 1.05 P) ►� AN() `29(.02 PAN h N Ra0F. C N l ' I Am Pt N U v- rzm5 t o,■1 ( M7e u5 I N--se-,5 ctP MY Pr20 44_ SG—wt y e-044c a ©F- "Tike lA N (,%2 ri) 1 N ► y OP- PT. tOS N 1N Apo rr - 2.4\ro kivAky Al E)(P2 SS/NG- /N CON 6s2n,S TO You. - I MI VMn r t& ^r* - Q2.o S to N OF- -TA-s- aLt (T-yo ivw 1AF—a M,Y PPin P Bc -TY Into I& 0 �.?Uy ZoN N,o w t N Cu,in Co tAiYS R -- V c P L i . (O 2 ) Z Gil Fyn D N t/ OK'g R D15o ra %o2 r-lam 17 QS t 4° y = 0 M -Lo R5-2 N NW `1SA c✓�, tei, N G t l.va SP ,y AAA tB 1--Out,P.,5 4,24 �U- F 3 Awls F75.2 Nov 112 "A 2 4 n/A4 Li N1 2'N N Li)WGD KJEAc LAC2--& ,k1 2FbRZfc . T'-k fri (2._ L t`t.ot S ibcS M CO t L-S. Dr' 1x+ /10 i 1 Ly rn_Thy C p (\I& tit voerz. L- J1 NG- E�IC� -PQrrC-� t`S t�C/k� NCB- vv)5 Lam- Pao 1,k)Vrn OF- A. v\L 1-kAR-0- T'hS 6 Nar I. pti`t�*Y Cv v'l N/wG-,NT" rZ I∎y Nne1-4p FPct 51415-i Ga O-['e;ta - 64-N 1\1131- ',yc ro �t c y P p GraTr 0)c t ■ I' A G Thy I2 (4tzo 601T I F / ,ujz,-r t_E' OF ND c ,L.►o A--► 2.Pc l..!_.t n Coin . - Gwo - 1<-NLI■ ) I N ,l ,u CCU,tom_ LJ V t■l,DT„ Nosoe. .1 t\/ v i9-m, i N C°o M AAAA Nt try ►N � y 0(2- Pl2o P- T7/14.0(t.e -- �-t-� P u� i�SFs- OP AA W(7- 46., V r.- I N (s- vva ()Oeve A/1 a,ge.> N v ---A- n,c,,,STS 11 1 b<Zrj Gc2_ l A 1_--t v► N & - pc L- , 1 N P� S • A.1 ,N1 , t2vt.03CC. et) oNry -\bON,kc 4 . VV &M M 1-t-c -4- I K1 / N C X Z d)f-,2- boy "MAO &i F i- or- P 101 N&- 1 N r 0 C., N -i P2i,m N Is A 60m. rvwt(v (T Y ) CC) N T'Y 11/6'r- < i SUt c-(2-0U NYC- U^oN8rLS NDec\AR , 'f'j marry Tikkr NAA,(Zl vt oz S tAppac c LiawlsaNs C((2 SPG P ) Dpi) sin ._ 5 11,0.0 i I ?One t,0 mo t- VE L*' l J • v6i-r tka s D9 NOT- Ne&o- .L Ul ci.-r ' A Nro t 5y .m ,2Po(2a vl -To 5 cat P Po 27'. US (N A4A-1 1S JT 1 NJ& 6btit CY-- uF Tc P6ut A tkz\LL OF. t) P+2=3 Qs2 ry ,niv QP- Lk& N � Zof\i9 0 i CoM.P 31ve. PI pt Nita" Vt NOD Gam- 2_ / LA alv -ro kid) r .�t�'7 Randy Kline From: Randy Kline Wiev5 Sent: Tuesday, February 18,2003 2:30 PM 1„ 4 To: Al Scalf; David Alvarez I Y� Cc: Josh Peters Subject: Airport Noise Overlay and Port Sub-Area Plan 200 Colleagues: I met with Port staff on Feb. 13 to discuss the proposed overlay language and timing for bringing forward the UDC amendment. At this meeting I also received the first draft of the Port's proposed CP changes related to land use. I am circulating a copy of the draft language to each of you via interoffice mail. Based on our discussion,the Port is leaning towards delaying the noise overlay public hearing until after the Port Commissioners have adopted their Master Plan. They anticipate adoption sometime in late April or early May(at the earliest)and are interested in conducting a workshop between the Port Commissioners and the BOCC sometime in mid- March. Larry Crocket will be sending a letter to David G.or the BOCC requesting a joint workshop. As a side matter,the Port's consultant was unaware that they were required to conduct environmental analysis on the proposed Master Plan--so the Port is struggling with how to address SEPA. At this point they are unsure that they will be able to adopt their Plan by the May 1 application deadline for Comp Plan amendments. Which, David, leads to a Port staff generated question--Can the County"docket"an unadopted Airport Master Plan that has yet to go through SEPA review? My understanding to this point has been that the Port will conduct SEPA review of their plan and that the county will adopt that analysis along with any additional review that is required. A few issues have surfaced that are influencing the Port's thoughts concerning when to bring forward the UDC amendments that are part of the settlement agreement: (1)They are concerned about use of a 50 DNL that varies from that included in the existing 1994 Master Plan. The thought is that they would be safer bringing forward the new DNL when it is part of an adopted Master Plan. (2)They are thinking of tying together the UDC changes and the CP amendment because,as proposed,the amended Comp Plan language drafted by the Port's consultant will require additional amendment to the UDC. So we could be in a situation where we are amending the UDC twice as it relates to the airport. While it makes sense to bring forward the noise overlay and CP amendment at the same time,the Port may be reluctant to do so because they are afraid that the noise overlay discussion will get lumped in with the land use debate regarding light industrial uses. As far as CP changes,generally,the Port is proposing that we get rid of the current airport overlay district designation and establish an "Airport Essential Public Facility District"that is a straight designated area--not an overlay. Within this district,the county would allow a range of uses that include limited light industrial use. They suggest that the same uses allowed in Quilcene, Eastview,and Glen Cove industrial areas could be allowed at the airport. Rather than make a LAMIRD argument--which could be made for portions of the airport property--the Port suggests that their statutorily mandated economic development charge could be used to justify appropriately scaled industrial uses as part of their Essential Public Facility District designation. The Airport EPF District would become a discrete land use district with a separate column on the use table,bulk and dimensional table,etc. • So where do we go from here... Like so many other complicated issues,the discussion of appropriate land use at the airport was put off during the CP adoption process. Potentially we are looking at concerns from the city,private industrial land owners,and adjacent residential property owners on the Quimper. Not to mention the revival of the Trottier Report. Here are some of the questions I think we should be considering: • What comes forward as an application from the Port--the entire Airport Master Plan as adopted by the Port and including all the Federal Aviation Administration info related to airport operations or just the land use map and CP/UDC text changes proposed by the Port? Do we even need to call it a sub-area plan? • Are we processing the amendment as a site-specific or a suggested amendment--fee versus no fee? 1 • How do we feel about the Port's proposed CP policy changes ? Can we support them ? • Should we have a workshop with the Board prior to their mid-march joint meeting with the Port Commissioners? • Also,since there is a delay,we can discuss some of the UDC changes proposed through the settlement agreement. For example, based on the Port's understanding of proposed section 3.6.11(b)we will be changing the land use map to include properties purchased by the Port prior to March 5,2001. Is it correct that we will be changing the land use map through this UDC amendment process? Generally,we will need to discuss how this amendment will come forward and how we will present it to the Planning Commission and the public. I would like to begin the press release process as soon as possible to generate discussion before the Port rather than deferring all discussion to the County amendment process. Al,any word on additional BOCC initiated CP amendments??? Randy Kline,Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development Long-Range Planning Division (ph)360.379.4464 (fax)360.379.4473 http:www.co.jefferson.wa.us 2 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES c ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 2-/3 .- d G«yS Doir.cf% PURPOSE: This section contains guidelines and policies which outline a process and define a set of criteria to be used to identify sites for development of facilities classified as essential public facilities,and for establishing an appeal mechanism. The suggested process stresses avoiding duplication in approval processes;considers the long-term as well as short-term costs of alternative siting criteria, provides for • effective public review of major facilities and emphasizes reasonable compatibility with neighboring uses. RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN Because of the provisions in GMA for siting essential public facilities, other elements of the Comprehensive Plan analyze the potential impacts associated with the siting or expansion of essential public facilities. - Element Discussion 1.Land Use/Rural Because of their potential size or nature, essential public facilities (EPFs) can have a substantial impact on land use and affect the overall rural character of Jefferson County. Design characteristics can be used to ensure that the EPF is compatible with its surroundings. 2.Environment The potential size of some essential public facilities may warrant significant environmental mitigation to protect critical areas, aquifer recharge areas, or other environmentally sensitive areas. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES-ISSUE BACKGROUND Essential Public Facilities include those facilities considered difficult to site because of potential adverse impacts related to size, bulk, hazardous characteristics, noise, or public health and safety. The CWPP stipulates that the County and its UGAs must identify appropriate land for essential public facilities that meets the needs of the community such as local waste handling and treatment facilities, landfills, drop- box sites and sewage treatment facilities, airports, state educational facilities, essential state public facilities,regional transportation and utility facilities, state and local correctional facilities, and in-patient facilities(including substance abuse facilities,mental health facilities and group homes). These facilities are difficult to site,serve regional or state requirements,or are part of a County-wide service system. The Revised Code of Washington(WAC) provides clarification as to what constitutes an essential public facility: - • "In the identification of essential public facilities, the broadest view should be taken of what constitutes an essential public facility, involving the full range of services to the public provided by government, funded substantially by government, contracted for by government, or provided by public entities subject to public service obligations." � Rib< r ' r ' ' ' CoV"ita t 4 a � KI*1‘tve 'the\ Potential Revised t Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-1 February 13,2003 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES The Office of Financial Management(OFM) shall maintain a list of those essential state public facilities that are required or likely to be built within the next six years. The Office of Financial Management may at any time add facilities to the list. In addition to the list maintained by OFM,Jefferson County may identify other additional public facilities that are essential to providing services to residents and without which development cannot occur. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PUBLIC PURPOSE LANDS Confusion often arises as to the distinction between lands identified for public purposes and those identified for essential public facilities. Essential public facilities can be thought of as a subset of public purpose lands. The table below illustrates this distinction. Table 9-1 Distinguishing Public Purpose Lands from Essential Public Facilities Public Purpose Lands Essential Public Facilities FOCUS: Lands needed to accommodate public FOCUS: Facilities needed to provide public • facilities. services and functions that are typically difficult to Lands needed to provide the full range of services site. to the public provided by government,substantially Those public facilities that are usually unwanted by funded by government,contracted for by neighborhoods,have unusual site requirements,or government,or provided by private entities to other features that complicate the siting process. public service obligations. Examples: Examples: • Airports • Utility Corridors • Large-scale.Transportation Facilities • Transportation Corridors • State Educational Facilities • Sewage Treatment Facilities • Correctional Facilities • Storm water Management Facilities • Solid Waste Handling Facilities& • Recreation Facilities Landfills • Schools • Inpatient Facilities(Substance Abuse • Other Public Uses Facilities,Mental Health Facilities& Group Homes). Many of the facilities identified in the table above as being"public facilities" located on public purpose lands are dealt with in other sections of this plan. The facilities in the column on the right of the table are typical essential public facilities and are addressed in this section. • GMA GOALS By their very nature or size, some essential public facilities may be unpopular with local residents, who • may object to certain types of essential public facilities, such as correctional facilities or airports,locating in close proximity to their homes. GMA addresses this "NIIVIBY" attitude and contains provisions to ensure that jurisdictions avoid exclusionary zoning practices that prevent the siting of essential public facilities. RCW 36.70A.200 states: Potential Revised - Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-2 February 13,2003 . T • ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES - I "No local comprehensive plan or development re gulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities." COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICY Adopted CWPPs require the County and UGAs to develop a cooperative and structured process, including public involvement at an early stage, to consider the siting of public facilities of a regional, state-wide, or federal nature. Solid waste disposal, correctional, transportation, education, or human service facilities, or any other locally unpopular land uses are examples of those facilities. Any new facilities or major expansions of existing facilities must conform to these locally defined siting procedures described in the strategies section. County-wide Planning Policy#4 outlines the County's approach to the siting of essential public facilities: • The County and incorporated UGAs will jointly develop specific siting criteria for siting essential public facilities. The proposed criteria will be considered in the drafting of comprehensive plan policy addressing this issue. Elements of siting criteria should include, but not be limited to the following: • proximity to major transportation routes and essential infrastructure. • land use compatibility with surrounding area. • potential environmental impacts. • effects on resource and critical areas. • proximity to UGA. • public costs and benefits including operation and maintenance. • current capacity and location of equivalent facilities. • the existence,within the community,of reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity. • Comprehensive plans and development regulations will not preclude the siting of essential public facilities;however,standards may be generated to insure that reasonable compatibility with other land uses can be achieved. • Essential public facilities sited outside of Urban Growth Areas should be self-supporting and not require the extension,construction,or maintenance of urban services and facilities unless no practicable alternative exists. Criteria will be established that address the provision of services when siting an essential public facility. Essential public facilities shall not be located in resource lands or critical areas if incompatible. JEFFERSON COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT The Jefferson County International Airport(JCIA)is owned and operated by the Port of Port Townsend,a special purpose district governed by an elected Board of Commissioners.The Port is authorized under the laws of Washington State to operate an airport as a self supporting enterprise. The JCIA has been designated by Jefferson County as an essential public facility in accordance with the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. This designation is based on the recognition of the critical role that the airport plays in providing transportation services necessary to the public health and safety, as well as in supporting iob generating economic • Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-3 February 13,2003 - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES development activities. The airport provides an invaluable alternative to surface routes for emergency medical transports and services, the shipment of goods and materials as well as access by local property owners,business travelers,and tourists.In addition,given the relatively isolated nature of the County, the airport is a valuable community resource during unplanned and planned road closures, such as the planned closure of the Hood Canal Floating Bridge in 2006 for extensive repairs. The operations of the JCIA is governed by Federal Aviation Administration(FAA1 Regulations which include stringent measures to protect the public health and safety and to ensure compatible land uses.This is accomplished through the preparation of an airport master plan prepared in accordance with FAA guidelines.The Port is currently in the process of updating its Airport Master Plain and in accordance with the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan, it will be adopted by the County as a Sub-area Plan and incorporated into this Comprehensive Plan. This Sub-area/Master Plan will guide future use and development of property owned or acquired by the Port in support of the JCIA as an essential public facility. Upon adoption of the Airport Master Plan as a County Sub-area Plan,the County in consultation with the Port and affected property owners, will revise County Codes and procedures as appropriate, to be consistent with this plan. This will ensure the continuing operations of the JCIA as an essential public facility, in accordance with FAA regulations, the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act, this Comprehensive Plan, and the County-wide Planning Policies. In addition, it will promote compatible land uses, preserve the rural character of the County, provide employment opportunities,and facilitate the operations of the airport as a self-supporting enterprise. It is also important to recognize that while the JCIA is an essential public facility, there is, as with other modes of transportation, noise associated with its planned and lawful operations. This is common to all airport operations and the FAA has established standards to ensure that noise from airport operations is not incompatible, nor unreasonably interfere, with the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. Fortunately, noise abatement measures adopted by the Port have resulted in compliance with FAA regulations regarding residential compatibility. Documented noise levels in excess of the established residential compatibility threshold of DNL 65dB is limited to a very small area of port owned property immediately surrounding the runways.In fact,the DNL 60 dB level has also been documented,using the most current technology, to be limited to Port owned property. Never-the-less, the Port and the County have proposed , as a public service, to notify all property owners within the documented DNL 50 dB levels,of their proximity to the JCIA and its status as an essential public facility. Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-4 February 13,2003 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES • ICI GOALS AND POLICIES GOAL: EPG 1.0 The County,in cooperation with its UGAs,will utilize the following siting criteria as the basis for siting new essential public facilities or for the expansion of existing essential public facilities: 1. Proximity to major transportation routes and essential infrastructure; 2. Land use compatibility with surrounding areas; 3. Potential environmental impacts; 4. Effects on resource and critical areas; 5. Proximity to UGAs . 6. Public costs and benefits including operation and maintenance; 7. Current capacity and location of equivalent facilities; and, 8. The existence,within the community,of reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity. 9. Other criteria as determined relevant to the specific essential public facility POLICIES: EPP 1.1 Establish an interjurisdictional approach to siting essential public facilities. EPP 1.2 Identify and designate essential public facilities of state-wide,county-wide and local significance and incorporate into the County Comprehensive Plan and Map and the County-wide Planning Policy. EPP 13 Ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and implementing regulations do not preclude the siting of essential public facilities. EPP 1.4 Adopt development regulations that ensure that siting of essential public facilities is consistent with the elements of the Comprehensive Plans of both the County and City of Port Townsend, as well as, the siting criteria jointly established by the County and its UGAs. EPP 13 Adopt development regulations for essential public facilities in conjunction with the City of Port Townsend,which consider the following factors: A. Specific facility requirements including, but not limited to, acreage requirements, transportation needs, availability of alternative sites, and infrastructure and services required by the facility. 1. Minimum acreage 2. Accessibility 3. Transportation needs and services 4. Supporting public facility and public service needs and availability thereof 5. Health and safety 6. Site design 7. Zoning of the site Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-5 February 13,2003 - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 8. Availability of alternative sites 9. Community-wide distribution of facilities 10. Capacity and location of equivalent facilities 11. State and federal siting requirements B. Impacts of the facility including,but not limited to, compatibility with adjacent land uses,environmental impacts and transportation. 1. Land use compatibility 2. Existing land use and development in adjacent and surrounding areas 3. Existing zoning of surrounding areas 4. Existing Comprehensive Plan designation for surrounding areas 5. Present and proposed population density of surrounding area 6. Environmental impacts and opportunities to mitigate environmental impacts 7. Effect on agricultural, forest or mineral lands, critical areas and historic, archaeological,and cultural sites 8. Effect on areas outside of Jefferson County 9. Effect on the likelihood of associated development 10. Effect on public costs including operating and maintenance 11. Proximity to Urban Growth Areas 12. Proximity to major transportation routes and essential infrastructure 13. Current capacity and location of equivalent facilities 14. Public costs and benefits including operation and maintenance 15. The existence, within the community, of reasonable alternatives to proposed activity C. Impacts of the facility siting on Urban Growth Area designations and policies including,but not limited to,proximity to existing UGAs,compatibility with existing UGAs and their associated development and the urban characteristics of the proposed facility. 1. Urban nature of facility 2. Existing urban growth near facility site • 3. Compatibility or urban growth with the facility 4. Compatibility of facility siting with respect to Urban Growth Area boundaries EPP 1.6 Adopt development regulations for essential public facilities which specify: a. The time required for construction b. Property acquisition c. Control of on-site and off-site impacts during construction d. Expediting and streamlining necessary government approvals and permits if all other elements of the County policies have been met. e. The quasi-public or public nature of the facility, balancing the need for the facility against the external impacts generated by its siting and the availability of alternative sites with lesser impacts EPP 1.7 Adopt development regulations for essential public facilities which include standards and criteria related to: Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-6 February 13,2003 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES a. Facility operations b. Health and safety c. Nuisance effects d. Maintenance of standards congruent with applicable governmental regulations, particularly as they may change and become more stringent over time. EPP 1.8 Ensure that new essential public facilities or the expansion of existing essential public facilities sited outside of Urban Growth Areas are self supporting and do not require the extension or construction of urban services and facilities unless no practicable alternative exists. EPP 1.9 Ensure that Jefferson County's policies and regulations on essential public facility siting are coordinated with and advance other planning goals. EPP 1.10 Ensure that where possible, essential public facility sites are used jointly for public benefit. EPP 1.11 Ensure that affected agencies and citizens, adjacent jurisdictions, and other interested parties are given adequate notice and opportunity for meaningful participation in. decisions on siting essential public facilities. EPP 1.12 Establish a review body with specified procedures established to hear appeals of site selection for essential public facilities. EPP 1.13 Combine public hearings for permits required by federal and/or state law for essential public facilities with any public hearing required by County development regulations whenever feasible. EPP 1.14 Any state essential public facility included on the list maintained by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) and proposed for siting within Jefferson County shall be subject to the same siting process as identified in both the County Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. EDP 1.15 Develop standards to allow reclamation of waste disposal sites to other land uses. EDP 1.16 Consider investigating whether the County can be waste disposal self sufficient for the next twenty(20)years. GOAL: POLICIES: _ -: ,._ •- -' - -• -. . _ . . ..--. . .. ._ ... .. ... _ - - Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-7 February 13,2003 ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES S . EPP 2.1.2 Aviation Related Development are those uses which aro reliant upon the EPP 2.2 Cooperate with the Port of Port Townsend to develop a sub area plan to Guido future • 7 �• 7 pfelaeFfies GOAL: which: _- - c • ,» « ,fa - - ._ • • " - .. •, - - V• _ " _ • _ • _ • " • r •, Duna..Preteetien Zones Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-8 February 13,2003 - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES . . , ,. - .. _ :.... , , • . _ , , __, - ... .._ • p •� _ . ' . . • -- •. . . ._ . . - . .• . .° .. • . , . • . , •. . • -- -- . . • and -es: . GOAL: . EPG 2.0 Ensure continuing operation of the Jefferson County International Airport as a safe and self supporting Essential Public Facility. POLICIES: D EPP 2.1 The Port of Jefferson County shall adopt and maintain an Airport Master Plan to guide the use and development of property owned or acquired by the Port in support of the Jefferson County,International Airport(JCCIA).This Master Plan shall: A A. Be formally adopted.by the County as a Sub-Area Plan and included in this 5c CO rf tI L 1 Comprehensive Plan or; Ate, N,j,,\I B. Provide for the safe operations of the JCIA and guide future development in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)regulations and the airport's designation as an Essential Public Facility C. Include provisions for the siting of compatible light industrial. manufacturing, and related activities on property owned or acquired by the Port, provided that such uses and development activities only require rural levels of services and provide job opportunities for rural residents. D. Establish design standards to guide future development in the Airport Essential Public Facilities District (AEPF District) including but not limited to setbackst landscape buffers, visual screening, access requirements, and rural bulk and dimension standards: E. Establish rural level of service standards to ensure that the future development of property in the AEPF District does not promote sprawl; Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-9 February 13,2003 - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES F. Identify opportunities for the off-site mitigation of potential adverse impacts to low value wetlands in the AEPF zone. EPP 2.2 Jefferson County shall designate parcels owned by the Port of qty in support of airport operations as the JCIA Airport Essential Public Facilities District (AEPF District)(see Exhibit A). OA,C'.„k YW , EPP2.3 The Jefferson Coun Uniform Development Code shall be reviewed and revised as 4‘..A appropriate to implement the approved JCIA Master Plan, in accordance with Federal ` Aviation Administration Regulations, the requirements of the Washington State Growth fo.,t�� : Management Act regarding the compatibility of land uses adjoining airports, and the status of the JCIA as a designated Essential Public Facility. d use and develo•ment activities 'tted in the AEPF District shall conform ,� withl e approved JCIA Master Plan,including but not limited to uses that directly or Co -gQ,,,,A indirectly support airport operations, as well as compatible light industrial and n manufacturing consistent with FAA regulations, retail sales as an accessory use to on-site manufacturing,and small scale commercial services necessary to serve airport users and area employees 3 B. Jefferson--C y shall,�n consultation with the Port of Port Townsend, affected property owners, pilots, and(the Aviation Division of the Washington State ; i Department of Transportation.ret4se ounty Codes and procedures as appropriate,to- Y,s c future land uses and develo.ment activities in the vicinity of the airport pct are compatible wi land uses and activities in the AEPF DUI ., C. All land use and development activities shall comply with FAA regulations including but not limited to electrical emissions,lighting,and height restrictions. D. Land use or development activities that attract concentrations of birds or waterfowl in or near the designated Airport Accident Safety Zones shall not be permitted. 3,„; E. Jefferson County shall provide the Port of Port Townsend with the timely opportunity „Ls._ c ardicomment on the compatibility of all land use and building permit ©c applications in the vicinity of the JCIA and the designated Noise Overlay District. EPP 2.5 Jefferson County shall, in consultation with the Port of Port Townsend, dopt noise regulations consistent wi Regu atio and the JCIA designation as an Essen Public Facility. t,.3 ot,) IA” w A.The County shall,in consultation with the Port of Port Townsend,establish an Airport Overlay Noise District consistent with the Noise Overlay Map included in the approved Airport Master Plan. (3c. 1D O C. nA ) Potential Revised T Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-10 February 13,2003 • ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES e_k C�v N a -CI r.Nt k t.c3o'- A. The County and the Port of Port Townsend shall, as a public service, notify all ck property owners within documented 50 dB areas of their proximity to the JCIA,and shall provide a copy of the JCIA Noise Overlay Map and disclosure statement to all title companies and real estate offices located in Jefferson County. EPP 2.6 Jefferson County shall review autitpRelve requests from the Port of Port Townsend to rezone selected parcels acquired by the Port to Airport Essential Public Facilities(AEPF), provided that: Ne •\&cS0e V S A. Parcels eligible for inclusion in the AEPF District shall be limited to property within —the'airport accident safety zone as designated in the approved Airport Master Plan,and/or (....AL bounded by State Route 19.State Route 20.and Four Corners Road. a designated County B. Rural levels of service are,or can be reasonably provided, to support uses permitted in the AEPF zone. c),t.c -EPP 2.7 Jefferson County and the Port of Port Townsend shall monitor state legislation and shall �` � evaluate the potential designation of the JCIA, in whole or in part, as an Industrial Land \ , Bank or related economic development land use category. in accordance with the t,v ;44N provisions of Washington State law. �Qtrc2,C'� a( •" t EDP 10.1 port the efforts of the Port of Port Townsend to operate the Jefferson County International Airport as a self supporting essential public facility. A. This may include, but is not limited to, the siting of both airport and non-airport manufacturing activities in the Airport Essential Public Facilities District, in accordance with the provisions of this Comprehensive Plan. EDP 10.2 In accordance with County-wide Planning Policy 7.5,the legislative authority of the Port of Port Townsend is recognized as a valuable tool to implement industry and trade strategies and should be used to the fullest extent to promote employment opportunities to meet the needs of industry consistent with the goals and policies of this Comprehensive Plan. STRATEGIES A. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES STRATEGY Potential Revised •Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-11 February 13,2003 • - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES Jefferson County's process for siting Essential Public Facilities consisting of the following components and the criteria contained in EPG 1.0,shall be utilized to make siting decisions regarding Essential Public Facilities. Action Items 1. The County's essential public facility site selection process shall consist of the following elements The County Commission shall: • Establish an Essential Public Facilities Advisory Committee(EPFAC) • Define EPFAC responsibilities and operating framework • Determine EPFAC composition • Appoint EPFAC members • Identify budget parameters • Establish process time-line • Negotiate and adopt agreement with agency or entity requiring siting • Coordinate and support the EPFAC process • Review EPFAC recommendations • Submit recommendations to requesting agency/entity. The requesting agency/entity should: • Negotiate and adopt an agreement with the County Commission • Solicit nominations for potential sites • Provide data support as appropriate and requested • Submit site nominations for analysis • Conduct initial SEPA review • Receive recommendations and begin follow-up process as appropriate The EPFAC should: • Conduct organizational and educational meetings in a public format • Quantify facility needs • Identify siting issues • Analyze and rank sites • Conduct public information meetings • Prepare recommendations • Present recommendations to County Commission • Coordinate all matters relating to the siting of EPFs,including interjurisdictional matters The EPFAC shall use the siting criteria contained in the CWPP and supplement these as deemed necessary. The committee shall also be guided in its decision by asking the following questions during each decision-making process. • Is the facility in the best interests of the citizens of Jefferson County? • In what regard is such a facility"essential"and is it truly public? • Which criteria should be applied to best locate such a facility? Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-12 February 13,2003 - ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES All meetings of the EPFAC shall be advertised to ensure timely public notice and to provide sufficient opportunity for all affected parties to comment on the proposed siting decision. (Corresponding Goal: 1.0) 2. Appeals to the decision(s) of the EPFAC shall be processed as a "Type C" decision, in accordance with Jefferson County's"Procedural Reform Ordinance."(Corresponding Goal: 1.0) 3. Adopt development regulations and establish a process to site essential public facilities on the list maintained by the State Office of Financial Management. All requests by the State to site essential public facilities of statewide significance shall be submitted with written findings of fact outlining the need for siting the facility in Jefferson County and an outline of the process used by the State to make its site selection decision. The findings shall include, but not be limited to, identifying all other jurisdictions considered for the facility and reasons for rejecting alternative sites.(Corresponding Goal: 1.0) 4. Advance planning goals regarding essential public facilities using the following strategies: • Reduce sprawl development . • Promote economic development and employment opportunities • Protect the environment • Provide positive fiscal impact and on-going benefit to the host jurisdiction • Serve population groups needing affordable housing • Receive financial or other incentives from the State and/or local governments • Support fair distribution of essential public facilities throughout the County • Require State and Federal projects to be consistent with this policy. (Corresponding Goal: 1.0) B. JEFFERSON COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT STRATEGY Action Items - - - .. . .... .. ‘°• .-:. e - _.. _ . . -... _ :... . .. .. 2. f r- -•." . ... . - -•- • • • Potential Revised Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 9-13 February 13,2003 - \XV���V/ts < � kc 3\Z`�O . 7 5 4to.4 Nq tst- `)-N''\,.i :"%.`‘- t7 Cam\ \. z\1 l\N 4 N\A_. c,.�ja:�� (� CcS: L��a\ \4,23‘V).S $u:� 4 2 N AOC I l�a\C C -� Vt. . U'r-S \s"...1"\ t's z4 r•\,Cq� C._. p L.PV,,.cS�- . S m a c C� \v • <"" NTt-�+i ` \Q o: vim 3 occA co��r - 1 a•‘ fo c \l SvC.6 Of� <_(\ K ' o i�Cd�S Q.) ‘NI A..■\\f .5 6 -I . i' AAL4034"31 (POI JEFFERSON COUNTY f DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'd21 Sin Street•Port Townsend•Washington 88368 :;;St3W976.445t�•t ls31 2678•St3pP87a4451 ax ,:� 51AY -6 1 www.oo.JaihrsOn.wa.uslronsrrvebpment Master Land Use Permit Application Form i .._ ..._t I.' , • . ' Tax Parcel Number: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (See Attached) Subdivision Name: hot Number. . Property Sisal 36.79 Acme o/square feet) Existing Use of Property: ForesitcY Sit.Address atdlor Dirac ions to Property: Ad[scent to 450 any Creek Road, Quiicene APPIkrant Of eppN MP.Marilee &_Gary Richard i l l fps, Kelly Phillips' TelePtiorie (360) 765-3413 Address: 450 Penny Creek Road City: Qui loans , WA Zip Code: 98 76 gamy Address pannyonold 44. AppoerCs S . '� olympua.net . raTsa.1 , Pe Records. see Attached Te Address: • City: State: Zip Cade: Email Address .seknOWedge that the applicant above I.applying tore building permit on my property. Owners Signature; 1 -roby . gnete Skip Urging • to act as my agent In mamas relall to this application for pennit(s). ,- .. <if . f . .�__ I L° . DESCRIPTION or PROPOSED W8 OR A01WTy(Include separate sheets as necessary) ""ems' m Expansion of MEL overlay as a prerequisite to expanding an existing surface mine. [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more krformalion and feather requirwnents.An asteriek(1 Indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. Tyw t at.N,etb BOW © Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EEC) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 5.16 JCC 13 Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 Cl Allowed'Yes"Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3.1 CI moms Business Table 3.1 and UDC Bogdan 4.20 (3 Stormwater Management UDC Section 6.7 d Road Access' + UDC Section 6.8 J Minor Am� UDC Section 3.6.13.15 Cl Sign UDC Section 6.16 © Site Plan Apppproval Advance Determination(SPA AD)(SD) UDC Section$.7 Cl ShorelineAMasbr Program Exemption/Pernik Revisions UDC Seddon 6 ja_lezegy Use(based on use may be 1 yae II or Tvoe 11i" U00 Sections 4.36 and 4.39 tom) rel. 1 Zd Wd8S:S 200E 0£ ' ae 50£61'Z 1'09£: 'ON Xed : WOdd ,..,,,„—T, k { x+7' u l '" r � to a ;3„ _� 7 "" , r "� k Yr h { r„r + �,w3 Project `Umber+97.01 A + < ,1 —"'''''''.1'. 1` r u' rn ni 3 ` 00 Ht is�' ,{r [b @cW� hj�r4 �,.,t F {� y.r." "'yjlx+l ,. '3 C Y f L ,y flin-ir. 4.0 > [�j lei `t1( rat J. .A`f Y`'� p. � 'SFr m c , m Kr N Cyr ' per' �. Sa ��::1,-:-'1'1'' ',''. 'I::, --'''a'a4V,;T1 o C7 �i Ge 6�° � > '� +� , ° 'tf<'Nr 47 a i. R a y b t> j t } S rr 944, fi to _ > P 1.1.1)Dge COQ 1 ! in , ,,,,le, ,pM1 1 2. � cep �, Roi 1� $ ' �lip :1 MO, ED O V f' 11!;1 4 N W iw 'A N N , :i a - m S/3 g . ft 1 g g 'ppy p F�...j 1;/11 . ...... w i'.1P p VO y x `✓,4 pp n N;O° N m W m `A 3 m� � °D f j sR 7o ii "Ii'':.112 Iwi!4 k 1![f tIgli _. 12oll % itt.<ig 14> ;, ,_,,. .,,,;?3,, ),-if . , . .P g ' c -/?ligii #4 qtp. ' ' ' ,, '; :0,..t714e04.- N � 1;111 4 , d /Js' L'p 7C N t3 g811! ElgZ1 li g Xg1 ?.214� 19EJ1 $gfffi Qp111 � Wiwi i If 1 1,qli xP p Dg ; NI II N.t 1:xPla 0 %ire i l ' .aitiP ii Is f >8 > Ise 1E tP O Hip I _o 71 O oo XI 13 D rn a mpo g8 "$ $ P 8 73 M :4 k 211 m N N 1 m a , rn rn O e I .. �„ � 1 C, ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 4/2003 -: NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING EXHIBIT A �� AND LAND PLANNING AWN gym— Penny Creek Quarry <r 1338 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. ---13.0___ 450 Penny Creek Road Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 22,T27N, R2W,W.M. i , (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9 305 REVIS.4-30-03 ? '` P v . r , J I t • EXHIBIT B PENNY CREEK QUARRY PROPOSED PLAN AMENDMENT TO EXPAND MINERAL RESOURCE LAND ZONING OVERLAY The proposed plan amendment is to add the mineral resource land overlay to 36.79 acres abutting the current Penny Creek Quarry MRL area and existing surface mine. Subsequent to approval, the applicants will submit application for a Type 1 approval to expand the existing quarry. The MRL overlay covers 19.34 acres. The subject 36.79 acres is undeveloped and has recently been partially logged. Adding the MRL overlay to this additional property will increase the total MRL coverage to 56 acres. Included in that coverage is a 3.75 acre parcel that was once a county-owned quarry which has been granted"grandfather"status. • • 1\ MAY - 1 2003 i _'s 1 P)93 -roject u •_r:s7.1 \ \ \\ \ \ \ 111111 1 III Oil, 1° \ \ ,6° 800 ` X80 11 2p dp '� o s VD I 1 „� 640 600 1 ‘ \illiklit, leO / �‘,k1 \ ?po��p �p0 ,po I �i► 720 Vj,. �il�\ _ 6 80...,.., N.I Air _..,m'v 640 4 600- ` , Z , 560 �4.p�,y �°p �� 520- - o 1"14)4` 4 ' �� 480,__ W °N v u 420 vg 1 °' - 400 0 0 • • 360— 320_--- - 8 280- ��` 240 '�� ` Z ?O° m lks 1) m Z1 r6, 0 I I va \ .,:. x R Ili IN .m _W igS n $ o 1 q -1 i 11 f q r-s\---1 \N O M 5'� at i 1 11 I 5 d w• m rn • q °O ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 4/2003 EXHIBIT C NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Existing Conditions DWN.LAND PLANNING Penny Creek Quarry 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. RG 450 Penny Creek Road Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 22, T27N, R2W,W.M. (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 REVIS.4-30-03 MAY - 111 1 2003 i l EXHIBIT E ^ PROPOSED COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO EXPAND THE MINERAL RESOURCE LAND ZONING OVERLAY AT THE PENNY CREEK QUARRY a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? Jefferson County granted the current Mineral Resource Land zoning overlay to the Penny Creek Quarry, a family operated business, in 1997. At that time, the applicants' ownership was limited to the 19.34 acres west, and an additional 1.62 acres east, of Penny Creek Road Since that County action, the Phillips family has acquired an additional 35.17 acres north of the current MRL area. The total common, contiguous family ownership is now approximately 56.13 acres. Thus, the change in circumstances is the shift in ownership of over 35 acres of land containing large volumes of commercially valuable mineral resources to owners and operators of a historic and viable surface mine operation on contiguous property. Because of the consolidation of land ownership, the potential has increased for a coordinated and and mining plan for the entire ownership that will be both economically viable and at the same time environmentally sensitive. The previously discrete ownership presented a major obstacle to reaching that goal. b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? The assumptions supporting the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan remain valid regarding this application, and indeed, support the application as well. It is the intent of the MRL is to provide assurance to those lands that contain mineral resources of commercial significance which can be anticipated to be extracted within 20 years that mining and processing activities will be protected from conflicts by developing land uses in the vicinity. Approval of the MRL to approximately 35 acres of land with such mineral resources adjacent to an area already designated and operating as a surface mine will provide assurance that such resources will be available to support future development and road and structure maintenance activities in the County. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1, 2003 Page 1 iiii MAY - 1 2003 " .)1 -- c. How does the proposed amendment reflect current widel Iheld values 4f-the residents of Jefferson County? While following the comprehensive plan amendment process, this application is for a mineral resource overlay zone. The overlay is intended to be temporary designation while the non-renewable resource is extracted and processed. The site is located in a sparsely populated segment of the County adjacent to publicly owned lands. Access is via a county road with a short distance to a state highway which reduces the impact on local roads. Applying the MRL overlay to property contiguous with a permitted active mine would maintain the active mining in an area where such activities have been ongoing and is well suited d. Does the proposal meet the concurrency requirements for transportation? The proposed quarry expansion that would follow approval of the MRL overlay on the subject 35 acres would continue operations at the present level of intensity. Because the mineral resources would not be extracted at an accelerated rate and crushing and processing would remain constant, there would be no increase in haul truck traffic from the site. Therefore, the transportation concurrency requirements would be met. e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental services)? Just as the MRL overlay and resulting mine expansion would not affect existing transportation facilities, it also would not adversely affect adopted levels of service for other county services. The MRL would not cause an increase in population or housing, and thus not stimulate the demand for law enforcement or emergency services, recreational facilities,general public administrative activities, and so on. f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals, ,policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? The proposed MRL will help fulfill numerous goals and directives of the county comprehensive plan. Expansion of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL would maintain a natural resource based industry in a rural area, consistent with LNG 12.0. It would merely expand a permitted active mine in an area where mining activities have been on- going, thus helping to better manage a mineral resource activity in area compatible with that type of land use per LNG 13.0. Ultimately, the mining plan for the expansion area - would follow LNP policies 13.1 through 13.4 by maintaining rural employment opportunities, by being designed to integrate with all regulations to ensure compatibility with managed habitat in the area, would comply with all applicable regulations to Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1,2003 Page 2 • I III II . I MAY - 1 2003 protect environmental values and surrounding land uses, and would also be designed to . be compatible with neighboring resource mana g ement activities. The subject property is located in a rural area which exhibits a wealth of natural resources. Expansion of the mine after the MRL overlay is granted would provide economic and employment opportunities consistent the rural nature of the area, thus contributing to the fulfillment of LNG 24.0, and policies 24.1 and24.2 Because of the vast quantity of commercially valuable mineral resources available on the site, the MRL overlay would help the county to fulfill NRP 1.0 by recognizing the Penny Creek Quarry mineral resources and protecting the associated extraction and processing activities from potential future conflicts caused by development in the vicinity. Recognizing that the mine plan for the expansion area must be consistent with all county and state mining regulations and approved by both the county and several state agencies, it would be consistent with policies NRP 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.8. It would also help to fulfill Goal NRG 2.0. Following the process and standards for mining in the Jefferson County Unified Development Code would lead to expanded mining operations consistent with policies NRP 2.1 through 2.4. Granting the MRL overlay would also help to fulfill Goal NRG 6.0 by recognizing the existence of the Penny Creek Quarry resources by protecting them for long-term economic use. The large deposit is of a quality that meets grade for road construction. The fact that mining has occurred for many years also attests to fact that it is within a quite reasonable distance to market job sites. Penny Creek Road provides direct access to the current mine operations; State Route 101 is only % mile distant. Most of the adjacent land is publicly owned forest land, and other tracts are used for scattered rural residential purposes which present little in the way of incompatibility. Noise from current operations has not been mentioned by neighbors as a problem and expansion of mining activities subsequent to MRL approval is expected to generate a comparable level of noise. Blasting in the expansion area is anticipated to be necessary but infrequent, similar to the existing operations; the site is sufficiently distant to not be an irritant to developed neighboring properties, and will not affect the forestry uses to the north and west. Penny Creek Road provides direct access to the existing mine and will continue to be the access.to the expansion area. SR 101, the primary arterial serving the Eastern Peninsula, is approximately '/s mile distant and would be the main route for haul truck traffic thus sensitive residential neighborhoods would not be adversely affected by large volumes of haul truck traffic. While mining and processing activity in the current MRL area and the expansion area is visible from Penny Creek Road and the surrounding properties, there is little development in the vicinity such that a significant number of people would not be affected Further, as mining progresses, sequential reclamation will be conducted. There are no water resources—streams or wetlands—on site to be - affected Slopes on the subject MRL expansion area are steep, but mining will be conducted in is to avoid triggering slides with adverse affects. While the Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species maps show the subject property as being within or in the vicinity of certain species habitat or management areas, a site Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1,2003 Page 3 1`3 11 MAY - l �; , 2003 specific evaluation indicates that mining will not adversely affect any of the identified fish or wildlife species. And, mining of the site after the MRL is approved would have no effect on flooding. Goal NRG 7.0 and the supporting policies call for the provision of mitigation for impacts related to mining and processing. While this application is only for a MRL zoning overlay, subsequent expansion of the Penny Creek Quarry will require Jefferson County environmental review and permit approval. A prerequisite of such approval will be a mine plan designed to comply with county regulations and performance standards, and which follows the usual sequencing when potential adverse impacts appear likely: avoidance, reduction, mitigation. Goal NRG 8.0 and supporting polices require that county mineral resource lands are appropriately reclaimed with functions of the landscape restored from the activities of mining. This directive will be accomplished through the county's review of the mining permit application and environmental analysis. It is important to note that the proposed mine expansion plan and reclamation plan must be approved not only by Jefferson County, but also by the Washington Department of Natural Resources which requires sequential reclamation by rule to ensure that the effects of mining are limited and the land is restored as mining progresses, and a substantial bond to ensure that the work is performed This dual review will ensure that the site is reclaimed after mining is completed Goal NRG 9.0 and supporting policies call for mining activities to include the preservation of water resources, both surface and groundwater. This directive will be fulfilled via a mining plan designed to meet both county and state standards. Approval of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area either will immediately be consistent with and fulfill the goals of the comprehensive plan, or will do so through a mining and reclamation plan designed to meet all county and state performance standards, and where adverse environmental impacts are apparent, include appropriate mitigation measures. g. Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network, capital facilities, utilities, parks, and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? While approval of the MRL overlay will lead to expanded mining at the Penny Creek Quarry, it will not increase any demand for county services. Expanded mining will not be at a rate or intensity greater than the current levels. Traffic generated from the expanded mine will be consistent with current rates. There will be no need for public capital facility expansion to serve the additional mine area. And the final mining plan will be required to be based on a reclamation plan that restores the site to a condition comparable to that existing. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1,2003 Page 4 ) !�{j MAY - i 2003 {I 1 1 � 1 ,Jf1' 1 h. Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? The proposed MRL overlay is intended to only to expanded mining at the Penny Creek Quarry. No services are presently delivered and none are planned or needed for the expansion. i. How is the subject parcel(s) physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development, including, but not limited to the following: (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities; and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? Approval of the MRL overlay (and ultimately the expanded mining operation) is an appropriate action for the County and the subject property. Mining has been approved and ongoing on adjacent properties. Penny Creek Road provides direct access to the subject property through the existing mine. No transportation improvements will be required to access the MRL expansion area, and because expanded mining will occur at the present level of intensity resulting in no increase in haul truck or employee traffic, no transportation improvements are necessary to accommodate the expansion. Because there is no development associated with the proposal, utilities are not required Water and sanitary facilities at the existing mine would continue to adequately serve employees in the expansion area. The subject property is bounded to the north and west by state owned forest land that has been partially logged in the last two years. Forestry is perhaps the most appropriate land use to be located adjacent to a surface mine because of the sheer lack of population potentially affected by mine operations. Otherwise, the neighboring land uses are sparsely developed rural residential activities distal to the subject site. j. Will the proposal, if adopted, create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties? If the answer is yes,how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interest of the county as a whole? Expanding the MRL designation to the entirety of the Phillips' Penny Creek Quarry ownership is not expected to create or increase pressure to change the land use designations of other properties in the vicinity. Planned uses to the north and west bordering the subject property are for continued forestry. The MRL overlay already exists to the south of the subject property and mining has been ongoing on that site for - several years. The only known request for amendment in the vicinity is this application. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1,2003 Page 5 ! i MAY : 1; '' 2003 '' k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed MRL overlay will not have any effect on the land use or population forecasts of the comprehensive plan. The goal of the applicants is only to provide sand and aggregate materials to the construction industry. In essence, Penny Creek Quarry does not create a market which would attract growth and development—it merely supplies the demand that is otherwise evident. 1. If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? The proposed rezoned is not within a UGA. m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A.RCW), the County Wide Planning Policy for Jefferson County,and other applicable inter jurisdictional policies or agreements,and any other local state or federal laws? The Growth Management Act calls for counties to designate mineral resources lands (in addition to timber and agricultural resource lands) of long-term commercial significance as a means of providing for their on-going economic viability. Because the subject property exhibits the characteristics required by UDC 3.6.3, granting the MRL overlay to the Penny Creek Quarry expansion area would be consistent with this aspect of the GMA. The only countywide planning policy applicable to this application is the policy regarding resource lands stating that urban growth areas should be separated by rural or resource lands, topographic features and open space. The subject property is far separated from the nearest urban growth area or urban village, and because of that distance while not helping to define an urban area, certainly meets the criteria of not being within such boundary, and is thus consistent. Because the site is exclusively within the land use regulatory jurisdiction of Jefferson County, there are no inter-jurisdictional policies or agreements applicable to this proposal. Designating the subject property with the MRL overlay would have no effect on other local, state or federal regulations. Mining the property subsequent to the MRL designation will be required to be permitted by both the county and state agencies responsible for mining and reclamation, water quality, air quality, land use compatibility and other environmental considerations. Because of the characteristics of the subject z property and its secluded location, the mining plan is anticipated to be capable of meeting all state and local standards. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. CP Amendment Application Exhibit E May 1,2003 Page 6 elik:;.1, JEFFERSON COUNTY 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • — - $► 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 ' MAY - I ,2003 �� 360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax www.co.jeferson.wa.us/commdevekpment i_ . -_. J r ,. -;x Master Land Use Permit Application Checklist - - • - - This packet contains materials to help you make application for permits and approvals under the Unified Development Code. The list below details those documents that constitute a complete application. Yes No WA [9'" ❑ ❑ Pre-Application Conference held. If the project application is made for a Type II or Type Ill penult or a Type I application proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand(5,000)square feet or more a conference.is required. Otherwise,this does not apply. ❑ A completed Master Land Use Permit Application Form (attached) This application must be signed by the property owner(s)and the agent,if an authorized agent is designated. EI" ❑ The applicable fee,as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance(see attached). ❑ ❑ A Site Plan. AM site plans shad be drawn with a straight edge and features shall be to scale. For Residential Applications-A site plan printed on 11"x17"(or smaller)paper with a graphic scale of 1'=50'for parcels over one acre in area and 1`1=25'for parcels under one acre showing the following. ❑ North arrow O Title block with the project name and address,drawing title,tax parcel number,and the name/address/phone of the person preparing the O All property boundaries,total parcel acreage or square footage dimensions,and the land use on adohlg parcels ❑ Building footprint and square footage for all proposed and existing structures[for Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)applications show buildable area rather building footprint] ❑ Environmentally sensitive areas such as ravines.seasonal creeks,bodes of water,wetlands,steep slopes,etc. ❑ On-site septic system location or sewer Ines(existing or proposed) O Well location or water lines ❑ Impervious surfaces such as driveways or patios O Setback distances from property boundaries to structures,distance between structures,and distance from structures to environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands,shoreines,steep banks,etc. ❑ location of any easements and encumbrances such as utility or access easements O Method and location of stamwater disposal facilitates such as drainage swabs,tightines,dry wells,curtain drains,eta O For applications on marine or river shorelines show ordinary high water mark,top of banks and height of banks - For Commercial.Industrial.Multifamily and Small-scale Recreational and Tourist Uses as listed in Table 3-1- Ask A site plan prepared by a licensed evil engineer,architect,or landscape architect containing the following information In addition to the general information required above On these instances,site plans may be printed on larger paper). O Al existing and proposed development or use areas. O Existing structures and significant features on the subject property and on adjacent properties. O Property lines,adjoining streets,and immediately adjoining properties and their ownership. O The layout of an internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation system,including location and dimensions of existing and proposed improvements on public rights-of-way such as rte.sidewalks,and curbs. ❑ Corner grades and existing contours of topography at five-foot contour intervals. O Existing and proposed grades and volume and disposition of excavated material,if applicable O Natural drainage direction and storm drainage facilities and improvements. O Locations of all existing and proposed utility connections ❑ Parking spaces and driveways. ❑ Proposed landscaping. Cif' ❑ ❑ A State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist(unless project is SEPA exempt) ❑ ❑ fig' Evidence of available and adequate water supply,if applicable,as required by the Jefferson County Department of Health and the Coordinated Water System Plan. ❑ ❑ ❑' Evidence of sewer availability, septic approval, or septic suit ability,if applicable,as required by the Jefferson County Department of Health for wastewater disposal. Q' ❑ ❑ Supplemental application sheets,if applicable. MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.07/24/2002 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Application No. 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Land (MRL) Zoning Overlay Expansion 2. Name of applicant: Gary and Mari Phillips, Kelly Phillips, Richard A. Maki, Jr., and Kristian N. Maid. 3. Address and telephone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Gary Phillips Penny Creek Quarry 450 Penny Creek Road Quilcene, WA 98376 (360) 765-3413 Contact: Skip Urling Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3r1 Ave., Suite 220 Longview, WA 98632 . . (360)578-1371 . 4. Date checklist prepared: MAY - 1 2003 • April30, 2003 L. 5. Agency requiring checklist: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Expansion of the MRL overlay is requested as part of the Comprehensive Plan 2003 annual review cycle. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain: Following approval of the MRL overlay expansion, applications will be submitted to the county and the Department of Natural Resources for mining and reclamation permits. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. DNR Mining and Reclamation Plan. DOE Sand and Gravel General Permit Application. State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Services Priority Habitats and Species data search. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services data search regarding ESA protected species. NOAA Fisheries on-line data search regarding ESA protected species. DNR National Heritage Information System data search for rare plants or high quality ecosystems. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain: None are known. 10. List any government approval or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Jefferson County -MRL Overlay, Type 1 Permit for mine expansion • Washington Department of Natural Resources — County or Municipality Approval For Surface Mining(Form SM-6) • Washington Department of Natural Resources—Surface Mining Reclamation Permit • Washington State Department of Ecology—Sand and Gravel General Permit(NPDES) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Mari and Gary Phillips and their children propose to expand the MRL zoning overlay to 36.79 acres abutting the existing Penny Creek Quarry for which the MRL overlay was granted to 19.34 acres in 1997. Approval of the MRL expansion will result in approximately 56 acres of common, contiguous property for which a comprehensive Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist ,A April 30,2003 Page 211 t MAY - 1 2003 mining and reclamation will be prepared Current mining disturbance, including an existing quarry previously owned by Jefferson County, encompasses approximately 9 acres. The project site currently contains portable rock processing equipment that crushes and screens the aggregate to market specifications. No additional processing equipment or operational equipment is anticipated 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a large area, provide the boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Penny Creek Quarry is located at 450 Penny Creek Road, in the Southeast % of Section 22, Township 27 North, Range 2 West, W.M., 1.5 miles southwest of Quilcene. EVALUATION FOR TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a) General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other. The existing quarry and proposed expansion tracts are located in a hilly to relatively steep area with sharp drops in the active quarries. There are natural rock bluffs directly above the excavated rock face and across the Big Quilcene River to the southwest of the site. b) What is the measurement of the steepest slope on ' 2003 - the site(approximate percent slope)? 4 a MAY ' 1 The steepest natural slope on the site is above the actively mined quarry face: approximately 75%. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 3 s I c) What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The US.D.A. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Soil Survey of Jefferson Count Area, Washington, 1975" identifies the surface soils as Olete-Hoodsport Complex(made up of about equal proportions of Olete very gravelly silt loam and Hoodsport very gravelly sandy loam) and Olete very gravelly silt loam. The Olete series consists of well-drainer, very gravelly soils underlain by basalt bedrock at a depth of 20 to 30 inches. d) Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No instability has been observed. Quarry expansion r should reduce any potential for slope instability on the interior of the site by reducing existing slope grades as part of the mining plan and subsequent reclamation. Mining at this site will utilize the cut method with progressive benches laid back from the pit floor: no backfilling is proposed. The majority of the project site is shown as a moderate ` to slight designated landslide hazard area on Jefferson County Critical Areas overlay maps. -� . ---- ' e) Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Subsequent to the MRL expansion, temporary removal and stockpiling of the soils and overburden overlying the marketable mineral resources will be required during mining operations. This stockpiled topsoil/overburden will then be replaced and regraded to the final contours according to the mine reclamation Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 4 plan. These topsoil and overburden materials will be sequentially replaced as each segment of mining is completed. f) Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Erosion could occur along the actively mined sections of the pit where cut slopes have not yet been reclaimed Erosion could also occur from the stockpiled overburden and topsoil until they are stabilized Reclamation will follow each mining segment in a contemporaneous manner minimizing any potential for erosion, and stockpiled materials will be surrounded stabilized with vegetation. g) About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None. h) Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: All stormwater will be contained and infiltrated within the permit boundary. During reclamation of the site, 11 II 200 stable slopes (no steeper than 2:1) will be regraded MAY - 3 - with drainage structures (vegetated swales and infiltration cells) designed to accommodate peak- prediction runoff and thereby reduce potential erosion. As the marketable resource material is exhausted in portions of the pit, these areas will be reclaimed while active mining moves to the next segment. This phased reclamation limits the amount of exposed surface material to the actively mined segment. Erosion from stockpiled overburden will controlled with typical measures such as silt fences or straw bales Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 5 until vegetation can be established to stabilize the piles. 2. Air a) What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust will be generated from mining equipment, processing equipment, occasional blasting, loading and hauling of materials. Emissions and particulate levels are not expected to increase beyond what is currently generated by the mining operation. b) Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: The quarry operation is currently registered with the Olympic Air Pollution Authority and has an approved _ . air pollution control plan on file. Equipment will be ;':.l� 1 `` ._. kept well maintained and in good repair, with 1�, • appropriate emission control systems. The site will be ; Li MAY - 1 2003 reclaimed in phases to limit the amount of exposed t i vY surface at any one time. The permitted mining ; L� operation will employ the Best Management Practices ; ,, :. of the industry to control dust, including wetting the excavation and processing area, haul roads, and stock piles as needed Both existing portable rock crushers are in compliance with the requirements of the Olympic Air Pollution Control Authority. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 6 3. Water a) Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The site is located on the slope north of the confluence of Penny Creek and the Big Quilcene River. The proposed mining disturbance boundary is at least 1000 feet from the river or the creek and is separated from them by either or both S.R. 101 (southeast) and Penny Creek Road(south). A small seep discharges from the southwest corner of the rock face of the existing quarry. Seepage in conjunction with stormwater is collected on the working pit floor and piped to a sedimentation pond. Field observations (January, February and March 2003) estimate the flow between 0.5-2.0 gal/min. No riparian areas or wetlands are located within the proposed MRL expansion area. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or '` '' adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described r • waters? If yes, please describe and attach available MAY - 1 2003 plans. • No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands indicate the area of the site, which would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 7 4) WM the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b) Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. Water to control dust will be hauled to the site. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into ^1 '" l I.-. j the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if ,< any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial,( P g � , ` • .�� MAY - 1 �� ;.. ; containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the -- _ number of such systems,the number of houses to be "f served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Not applicable. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 8 c) Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Although several recent field observations over a three-month period have not found evidence of stormwater runoff, it is reasonable to expect that runoff may occur due to the nature of the soils and slopes on site. The mining and reclamation plan for the expanded quarry will include an infiltration drainage plan with vegetated swales and a settling pond constructed for the collection and treatment of stormwater. Mining will be conducted in segments and each segment constructed to contain all potential runofffrom leaving the site. A small seep from the existing rock face is currently being collected on the quarry floor and piped to a constructed settling pond, which will be maintained throughout the life of the mine. 2) Could waste materials enter ground of surface waters? If so,generally describe. No See below. ': '` d) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, • MAY - 1 2003 . ground and run-off water impacts,if any: The mining and reclamation plan for the expanded quarry will comply with all applicable requirements of the State Water Quality Program Sand & Gravel General Permit, including a stormwater management and erosion control plan. A Spill Prevention, Containment and Countermeasures Plan will be prepared and followed while operating at this site and Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 9 • should prevent any accidental oil or fuel spills from reaching ground water. Potential run-off will be contained in settling ponds and infiltration swales in a drainage system designed to not appreciably alter the natural hydrologic conditions or balance of the site. 4. Plants a) List types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous trees: Red alder, vine maple. evergreen trees: second or third-growth Douglas-fir, western hemlock shrubs: Himalayan and trailing blackberry, vine maple, sword fern, salal, Oregon grape, rhododendron. grass: various species on recently disturbed areas. pasture: none. crop or grain: none. wet soil plants: none. water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: none. ,' ': ii‘ 3 ' ,S other types of vegetation: mosses, lichens. . ,;; MAY - 1 2003 b) What kind and amount of vegetation will be (_.....__.. .. ..__ removed or altered? No vegetation will be removed as part of the MRL overlay action. Approximately 40 acres of forest vegetation will be removed within the 56 acres of Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 10 • mining area under Phillips family ownership. Approximately 15 acres to the north of the previously mined area has recently been clear-cut. (FPA/N # 2605231). Removal of the timber and understory and subsequent reforestation will occur in phases as mining progresses according to a segmented mining and sequential reclamation plan. c) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A data search of DNR's National Heritage Information System resulted in no record for rare plants or high quality ecosystems in the vicinity of the project. d) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: Following the reclamation requirements of RCW 78.44, all topsoil and overburden in the proposed mine expansion area will be salvaged, stockpiled, and used to revegetate reclaimed segments of the mine site. The subsequent use of the site will be rural residential consistent with current or future zoning and reclamation will focus on the planting of native tree and grass species. 5. Animals a) List any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site: I I MAY - 1 2003 birds: songbirds, crows, raptors, woodpeckers,jays. U mammals: deer, rodents, rabbits, raccoons, opossum fish: none Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 11 b) List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Services Data Search Regarding Habitats and Species, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Data Search Regarding Endangered Species were searched. These reports concur that no breeding, spawning,foraging or nesting of Endangered or Threatened Species has been recorded on the project site. The nearest Priority Anadromous/Resident Fish Presence has been recorded in the Big Quilcene River, approximately 1,000 feet south of the subject property boundary at its nearest point. Other Priority and State-monitored species (Harlequin ducks, ospreys and bald eagles) utilize Penny Creek and the Big Quilcene River riparian areas for breeding, nesting, and foraging. A single osprey nest, located downstream of the mine site, is "well outside" the WDFW- recommended 660 feet buffer. The closest eagle roosting area is reported as being % mile from the project site, and the closest bald eagle nest is approximately %2 mile from the site (WDFW). "It appears from the site plan that all recommended buffers will be met for Harlequin ducks therefore it is unlikely that the proposal will have a significant impact on this species" (WDFW). The subject property is 1.5 miles from any active I ' ' • , spotted owl or marbled murrelet nest. The site is within two established spotted owl management �! • ' MAY ' 1 2003 circles. US. Fish and Wildlife Service reports that L..._•_ "critical habitat" for the marbled murrelet and the :. ;, northern spotted owl "has been designated within the vicinity of the project." A WDFW Data Analyst has suggested that much of the area within the WDFW Spotted Owl Management Circle Established Territory is not spotted owl habitat and that the project may not result in any habitat loss. (Ann Potter,pers. comm). Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 12 • c) Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes. Pacific Flyway. d) Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The zoning.for this site is Rural Residential 1:5 and 1:20. Vegetation and landscape management of rural home sites tends to promote wildlife use by species that benefit from the edge effect of open space adjacent to woodlands. The reclamation plan will provide for sequential revegetation of each mined segment with native tree species and/or pasture grasses, depending on soils, slopes, and plans for subsequent development as home sites. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a) What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity from an enclosed on-site generator is used to power the operational equipment such as the jaw crusher and screening equipment. Diesel fueled trucks and loading equipment are also utilized b) Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. • No `i ... • u MAY - 1 2003 • Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 13 c) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe: Explosives will be used occasionally to fracture the rock formation as part of the excavation process. Generator and loading equipment are refueled on onsite from a mobile 1000 gallon. fuel truck There are no fuel tanks on site. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards: Best management practices will be employed on the site to reduce the potential for accidental fuel or oil spills from occurring during equipment refueling. j,- y .: BMPs will also be used to quickly and completely ' `!; `' clean up any spills consistent with the spill prevention 1! countermeasure and control plan and remove soil or j i� U MAY - 1 2003 other spilled-on material to an approved disposal site. All blasting will be conducted by a licensed blasting L..'':{'' ' .. " I contractor who will be responsible for compliance with the Department of Labor and Industry's "Safety Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 14 Standards for the . Possession and Handling of Explosives" (Chapter 296-52 WAC). b) Noise 1) What types and levels of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? There are no noises in the vicinity that affect the existing mining operations or could affect those proposed in the expansion area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Mine operation equipment, specifically wheel loaders, excavators, trucks, crushing and screening equipment are currently active during daylight hours (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday). No change in operating hours is proposed Occasional drilling and blast events, supervised by a licensed blasting contractor, can also be expected based on market demand and volumes being • excavated. Blasting has historically been conducted two to three times per year. County notification procedures for surrounding property owners will be followed prior to any scheduled blast. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise MAY - 1 2003 impacts if any: L Mining as proposed for this site will create a "box" cut surrounding the benched working face that will attenuate noise impacts. The noise-muffling effect will increase with the sequentially reclaimed mined topography and the distance of the operations from the Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 15 t ' scattered residences in the vicinity. All equipment, including the loaders, excavators, and haulers, are outted with mufflers that will be kept in good operating condition. Blasting will be kept to minimum, with the majority of the rock material capable of being extracted with mechanical ripping (two to three blast events per year anticipated). 8. Land and Shoreline Use a) What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Mining, timber production, and low-density rural residential. b) Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No. c) Describe any structures on the site. Scale shack,metal pole building. d) Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Not until completion of mining. e) What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural Residential 1:5 and 1:20 f) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? i!I .' MAY - 1 2003 . Rural Residential Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 16 g) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h) Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Yes. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area and Geologic Hazard Area. i) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Typically during active mining phases, and dependent on market demand 1-4 people would be expected to be working on site during normal operating hours. j) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None. 1) . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: ; The processing area for the existing and proposed mine expansion area will remain at the current !• I MAY - 1 2003 s location and is expected to operate at current levels. Mining in the expansion area will be conducted according to a mining and reclamation plan prepared ' ;,;; • to county and state performance standards and ` specifications. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 17 9. Housing a) Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low- income housing. None. b) Approximately how many units would be eliminated,if any? Indicate whether high-,middle-, or low-income housing. None. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any None. 10. Aesthetics a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The portable rock crushers and screening equipment are the tallest (approximately 20' high) structures on site. b) What views in the immediate vicinity would be • altered or obstructed? ;; I.t None. . '.. f,t i �.' MAY - 1 2003 c) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic i impacts,if any: ;, ,:: . A mining and reclamation plan approved by the county and WDNR will be followed to sequentially mine and restore the current MRL designated area and the expansion area... The reclamation plan will include a Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 18 design to restore the aesthetics of the site. These features include sinuous slopes with varied topographic relief.. 11. Light and Glare a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No lighting is proposed in the expansion area as operations occur primarily during daylight hours. b) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c) What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None. 12. Recreation a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. MAY - 1 2003 "' b) Would the proposed project displace any existing _ recreational uses? If so,describe. No. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 19 � • I III c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. 13. Historical and Cultural Preservation a) Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b) Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a) Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on-site plans,if any. The site is located Penny Creek Road 0.5 miles southwest of the intersection of State Route. 101. • Penny Creek Road is an asphalted county road that has been used by haul trucks from the existing quarry • MAY - 1 2003 for a number of years. b) Is site currently served by public transit? No. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30,2003 Page 20 • If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Quilcene, WA: 11/2 miles. c) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The mine does not have formal parking spaces. d) Will the proposal require any new roads or streets or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e) WM the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f) How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on present levels of operation, haul trucks leave the site between 0 and 15 times per day. Because of . the constraints and unpredictability of market demand, : traffic generation will vary over the life of the mine. " ° i'' it g) Proposed measures to reduce or control . , MAY - 1 2003 transportation impacts,if any: • i Because mining at the current site and expansion area is expected to continue at present levels, traffic is not anticipated to increase and the level of service of the local and regional transportation facilities will not be Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 21 • affected. No measures to reduce or control transportation impacts are necessary. • 15. Public Services a) Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b) Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. None. 16. Utilities a) Utilities currently available at the site: Electricity and telephone. b) Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity,which might be needed. Since the existing equipment powered by the on-site generator is expected to continue to meet the needs of MAY - 1 2003 the surface mine, no utilities are proposed for this project. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date submitted: May 1,2003 Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 22 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; productions,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal is ultimately for an expansion of an existing quarry (to approximately 56 acres) and initially for a Mineral Resource Lands aPP Y ) lY .f (MRL) Overlay Designation for 8 parcels now designated Rural Residential. The requested overlay would add approximately 33.79 acres of MRL designation to 19.34 acres already designated MRL. The extension of the life of the quarry operation via an expanded MRL f, c J. , • overlay has the potential to produce on-going impacts to air quality•IL I __..._. _._.._ rough the generation of dust, impacts related to noise from rock J ! rushing and blasting, and impacts to the associated critical aquifer ' 1 g 8' P j 1, - charge area from possible oil or fuel spills. None of these impacts is � ,, MAY 1 � g 1r P .� sP .f P kely to increase beyond present levels. f,- :1 .• �T!'he existing quarry does not discharge runoff to surface waters or store or release hazardous substances. All seepage is currently diverted to a constructed settling pond. No toxic or hazardous substances are stored on site. No change in fuel storage needs is anticipated Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Dust impact will continue to be mitigated with the application of water to the active mining area and to dust producing equipment, as needed The mine operators have registered the current operation with the Olympic Air Pollution Authority and are monitored by that agency. Noise impacts will be mitigated by reliance on a licensed blasting contractor to oversee all blasting events and to be responsible for the handling and management of explosives according to state law. No explosives are or will be stored on site. Blasting is anticipated to occur only 2-3 times per year. County notification procedures for affected property owners will be followed prior to all scheduled blasts. Impacts related to critical aquifer recharge will be mitigated by compliance with ground water protection best management practices found in the mining and quarrying performance standards contained in Sections 4& 6 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish or marine life? Mining by its nature affects plant and animal life. Vegetation will be removed and soils will be stripped and stockpiled The effects of operations at the Penny Creek Quarry, however, will be minimized by the location of the site and the nature of previous disturbances (logging, mining and road-building) that have already limited the site's value as wildlife habitat. There is no old growth forest remaining within the proposed project boundaries, or anywhere adjacent. Most of the forested areas on-site are Douglas-fir stands ranging in age from 8-40 years. There are no wetlands or riparian areas within the proposed project t boundaries. The nearest water body is the Big Quilcene River, which is approximately 1000 feet from the nearest boundary. Penny Creek is no closer than 1300 feet. The project does not infringe on any shoreline or L^ 7" wildlife management buffers established along riparian corridors. Please see the fish and wildlife impacts analysis attached to the ' application. Proposed measure to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish or marine life are: A mine reclamation plan, approved by the county and the Department of Natural Resources, will establish the post-mining site design and the methods for achieving the post-mining land-use goal (Rural Residential). In the on-going process of reclaiming the site, wildlife habitat will be rehabilitated with replacement of soils and revegetation. Regrading the site will establish topography that blends with adjacent contours and minimizes potential for erosion. Revegetation with native trees and grasses according to this plan will stabilize slopes and ultimately improve the site's habitat value. The mine reclamation plan includes a stormwater control and drainage design to prevent unfiltered runoff from reaching surface or groundwater. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. SEPA Supplemental Checklist April 30,2003 Page 2 This system will be designed to keep all stormwater runoff on site: it will be directed to constructed infiltration swales or sedimentation ponds. In conjunction with the best management practice provisions of an NDPES water quality permit issued by the Department of Ecology, the mine reclamation plan will protect fish and wildlife from the impacts of uncontrolled runoff. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Since mineral resources are non-renewable, the mining proposal will inevitably deplete these resources. Other natural resources, such as timber and wildlife habitat, can be renewed and enhanced through implementation of a site-appropriate reclamation plan. ��;.' Energy resources will not be depleted by this proposal; no additional ; „ / \ consumption of fuel is anticipated beyond what is already required to maintain operations. Y �QY l`' Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: ``i Sequential reclamation of the site according to a county and state- \ f g ty \� approved mine reclamation plan. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks,wilderness,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,floodplains,or prime farmlands? The proposal will utilize, but is not likely to adversely affect, areas that have been designated environmentally sensitive by Jefferson County. Potential impacts to Critical Aquifer Recharge area will be minimized by compliance with a NPDES Sand and Gravel General Permit) and by the use of a Spill Prevention, Containment and Countermeasures Plan in the event of accidental fuel or oil spills. Potential impacts to Geologic Hazard Areas will be minimized by the reduction of existing slope grades as part of the mining and reclamation plan. The cut method of mining will result in progressive benching laid back from the quarry floor; benched slopes will be re-graded into the surrounding topography at no steeper than 2:1. Reclamation will be accomplished in phases as mining progresses and will result in less exposed surface area at any one time. Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. SEPA Supplemental Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 3 Sequential revegetation of mined segments will help stabilize slopes and prevent erosion. Note: a Mineral Resource Lands overlay on 20 adjacent acres with the same critical areas' designation was granted by the County in 1997 (ZON96-0042). There are no other areas on the subject property that have been established as environmentally sensitive or designated for government protection. Habitat for the northern spotted owl and the marbled murrelet has not been established for the area within the proposed boundaries. The nearest active nest site recorded for either species is one and one-half miles from the project boundary. The Department of Natural Resources recently (April 2, 2003) issued a Forest Practices approval for timber harvest on 15 acres within the subject property. The absence of old growth forest habitat and continued logging, plus the County land-use designation of Rural Residential, would seem to make the project site not preferred for either species. • ~ , Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce ,-:_ impacts are: r, r I >- Sequential reclamation of the site according to a state-approved and county-reviewed mine reclamation plan, which will establish controls for jstormwater runoff and will minimize erosion. The mine plan and o p erations will comply ly with the mining and quarrying performance standards for ground water protection best management practices pertaining to operation, closure and crushing contained in Sections 4 and 6 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed project boundaries are outside of the floodplain and more than 200 feet distant from the Big Quilcene River, and therefore outside of any shoreline designation. The Jefferson County land-use and zoning designation for this property is Rural Residential, 1:5 and 1:20. Post-mining reclamation of this site can be easily designed to accommodate a subsequent use as rural home sites. The establishment of gradual (no steeper than 3:1) slopes and grading of the reclaimed areas to blend with the contours of the surrounding Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. SEPA Supplemental Checklist April 30, 2003 Page 4 topography will provide erosion control and minimize landslide hazards. Phased post-mining revegetation with native species will provide additional stability and aesthetics and further encourage the proposed land use. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Access to the quarry is via Penny Creek Road Traffic from the site is currently in the range of 0-15 trips per day, depending on varying market demand for the rock resource. This traffic level is not expected to increase as mine operations continue into the proposed expanded MRL. There is currently no demand for public services or utilities generated by the mining operation. This is not expected to change while the site is utilized for mining. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable 7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. For the reasons previously stated, the proposed Mineral Resource Lands Overlay Designation is not in conflict with any known local, state or federal laws or environmental protection requirements • L. MAY - 1 2003 ill'! l Penny Creek Quarry Mineral Resource Lands Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. SEPA Supplemental Checklist April 30,2003 Page 5 ! !I MAY - i 2003 ,'--)' Penny Creek Q uurry ocP i Mineral Resource Lands District Overlay Expansion Application UDC Section 3.63 Criteria Mari and Gary Phillips are owners of the existing Penny Creek Quarry located at 450 Penny Creek Road in Quilcene. The existing quarry covers two parcels--702224002 and 702224006—totaling 19.34 acres and was granted the designation of"mineral lands of long term significance"February 10, 1997. See File ZON96-0042. The Phillips and their children,who collectively own the property adjacent to the existing MRL overlay, wish to expand the family operated quarry and request that Jefferson County designate the "Mineral Resource Land Overlay District" to the adjacent contiguous 35.17 acres of ownership. Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance are those lands from which the commercial extraction of minerals (sand, gravel, rock and other valuable aggregate or metallic substances) can be anticipated within 20 years and which are characterized by six criteria. The designation criteria from Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) are presented below followed by a demonstration that the request is consistent with those criteria. UDC 3.6.3 a. Have a known or potential extractable resource in commercial quantities verified by submittal of a geologic and economic report prepared by a qualified professional. The subject 35.17 acres has a substantially volume of high quality mineral resources in commercially viable quantities. Please see the attached report for a detailed analysis. UDC 3.6.3 b. The parcel is a minimum of ten (10)acres in size. The area requested for the zoning overlay consists of 37.79 acres (Parcels 702224023, 702224024, 702224025, 70222426, 70222403, 702224011, 702224012, and 702224010) in Section 22, T27N, R2W, WM, the Phillips own adjacent to the current permit area. It is important to note that Parcel 702224010 was until recently a surface mine owned and operated by Jefferson County,and recently granted"grandfather"as a nonconforming use with rights to continue mining. The total contiguous, common family ownership is greater than the 10 acre minimum for the overlay and satisfies the intent of this criterion. UDC 3.6.3 c. The subject property is surrounded by parcels no smaller than five (5) acres in size on 100% of its perimeter. To the south of the subject property is the existing quarry which consists of a 9.34 acre parcel and a 10.00 acre parcel. To the west and northwest is Parcel 702221001, (229.97 acres) owned by the State of Washington. The state also owns the quarter-section (160 acres) Parcel 702221002, to the north the subject property. State Route 101 abuts the property on the east. Thus,the request meets the requirements of this criterion. !V`11 MAY - 1 2003 ';' (1 ' 1 I UDC 3.6.3 d The current or future land use designations will not exceed a residential J density of one dwelling unit per five acres. The "Quilcene Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations" map shows the subject property as RR 1:20 and RR 1:5. The proposal complies with this criterion. UDC 3.6.3. e. Are not within any shoreline designation or Rural Village Center or within one-half mile of any established or potential Urban Growth Area or Rural Village Center boundary,as shown on the Official Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. Quilcene, the nearest Rural Village Center to the subject property, is more than 1 mile east along SR 101. No urban growth boundaries are illustrated or known to exist in the vicinity of Quilcene; additionally, no potential urban growth areas of Rural Village Centers are shown as planned. Because the site is outside of the floodplain and more than 200 feet distant from the Big Quilcene River, it is outside of shorelines jurisdiction. Thus,the subject property meets the requirement of this criterion. UDC 3.63.f Are not within a regulated wetland or fish and wildlife habitat area pursuant to Section[s]3.6.8 and 3.6.9 of this Code. The subject property has been partially mined and a portion has been recently logged (FPA#2605231,issued April 2,2003). There were no comments from any of the state or federal resource agencies to the Department of Natural Resources during the review of the application for that logging permit. Previous logging activities have resulted in the site being partially covered with multiple age stands of timber ranging from 5-8 to approximately 40 years. Approximately 40 acres of state land north of the subject property has been clear-cut within the last two years (Timber Sale: Four Penny, Agreement No. 30-071007). There were no resource agency comments to that timber sale as well. Correspondence from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and a copy of WDFW's Priority Habitat and Species Map for the project vicinity indicate the presence of several fish and wildlife species in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed expansion of the MRL overlay to the subject property and subsequent mining is not anticipated to adversely affect any of the identified species. Please see the attached analysis for further detail. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. UDC Section 3.6.3 Criteria May 1,2003 Page 2 GEOLOGIC AND ECONOMIC REPORT FOR PROPOSED PENNY CREEK QUARRY MINERAL RESOURCE LAND EXPANSION Irr) fc-" Quikene,Washington •1 I Jefferson C ;!1 II MAY - 1 2003 II Prepared For: Penny Creek Quarry 450 Penny Creek Road Quilvene, WA.98376 Phone: (360)765-3413 Prepared By Ecological Land"Services, Inc. 1339 Commerce Ave., Suite 311 Longview, WA 98632 (360) 5,784371 April 29, 2003 CONTENTS Geologic and Economic Report For Penny Creek Quarry 1 -INTRODUCTION 2-SITE DESCRIPTION I 1 2.1—Site Location .! 3 f 2.2—Background '`' MAY - 1 2003 3-GEOLOGY 3.1—Regional Geology 3.2—Site Geology 4-ECONOMICS 4.1-Accessibility 4.2—Permitted Surface Mines With In Jefferson County 4.3—Size of Basalt Deposit 5-CONCLUSION REFERENCES LIMITATIONS FIGURES FIGURE 1—Site Location Map FIGURE 2—1997Aerial Photograph FIGURE 3—Property Ownership Map FIGURE 4—Pre-Mining Topography Map FIGURE 5—Geologic Map !II 1E :, t 11 MAY 1 2003 • 1 —INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) has prepared this Geologic and Economic report to support an application for a Mineral Resource Lands zoning overlay (MRL) on approximately 36 acres adjacent to the Penny Creek Quarry, an existing surface mine with the MRL overlay. This report, including the maps and figures, is intended to satisfy requirements as stated in Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Section 3—Land Use Districts section 3.6.3(1a) (UDC). 2 —SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1—Site Location The subject property is located approximately 1.5 miles southwest of Quilcene, Washington, north of the existing and county permitted Penny Creek Quarry at 450 Penny Creek Road (Figure 1). A 1997 aerial orthophotograph also identifies the site (Figure 2). The existing MRL overlay covers two parcels--702224002 and 702224006— totaling 19.3 acres (Figure 3). The area requested for the expanded zoning overlay consists of 36.79 acres (Parcels 702224023, 702224024, 702224025, 70222426, 70222403, 702224011, 702224012, and 702224010;) we note that the last parcel was the site of a county operated surface mine and has recently been granted"grandfather"status. The legal description of the existing quarry and proposed MRL overlay area where the mine would be expanded is the NW 'A of the SE 1/4, NE 1/4 of the SE '/4, in Section 22, Township 27 North,Range 2 west of the Willamette Meridian. 2.2—Background Mari and Gary Phillips are owners of the existing Penny Creek Quarry located at 450 Penny Creek Road in Quilcene. The existing MRL quarry covers approximately 19 acres and was granted the designation of"mineral lands of long term significance" February 10, 1997. See File ZON96-0042. The Phillips and their children own approximately 37 acres adjacent to the current MRL designation and existing mine site and propose to expand the quarry and request Jefferson County designate the "Mineral Resource Land Overlay District"to the contiguous family owned tracts. Approximately 20 acres of this additional property was left to the Phillips and their children by testamentary provisions and the Phillips purchased approximately acres from Jefferson County in late 2002. The Phillips already owned the remaining 2.59 acres. Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance are those lands from which the commercial extraction of minerals (sand, gravel, rock and other valuable aggregate or metallic substances) can be anticipated within 20 years and are characterized by six criteria found in UDC 3.6.3. This report addresses one of those land use criteria found in "UDC 3.6.3 (la). Have a known or potential extractable resource in commercial quantities verified by submittal of a geologic and economic report prepared by a qualified professional." Geologic&Economic Report 2 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 l _L MAY - 1 2003 I • The basalt material extracted from the current surface mine is located within a volcanic deposit and is utilized for a variety of local and state road and construction projects. Mining typically involves removing a relatively thin layer of topsoil/subsoil (18 inches) before extracting the basalt deposit. Mining activity has occurred at this site since the 1940's. The Phillips have been mining the Penny Creek Quarry for the last 7 years. The Phillips' ownership lies at the base of steep pitching topography that slopes east to a narrow valley where the Big Quilcene River flows easterly to Quilcene Bay. The Big Quilcene River is located approximately 1,000 feet south of the subject property and active mine (Figure 4). State Route 101 and Penny Creek Road are located between the river and the existing mine site and subject property. Penny Creek is located over 1,300 feet south of the proposed mining boundary. No streams or critical habitat are located within or immediately adjacent to the existing mine or proposed MRL overlay property. The site and surrounding area consist of evergreen and deciduous forest stands of various ages. DNR property to the north was clear cut within the last two years and portions of the subject property were just recently clear cut. 3 GEOLOGY 3.1—Regional Geology The existing mine and proposed MRL expansion area is located on the eastern slope of the Quilcene Range, approximately 2.5 miles west of Quilcene Bay. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Geologic Map of Washington—Northwest Quadrant, describes the geologic units in the region as being Volcanic Deposits(Evc) and Unconsolidated Sediments (Qgt) (Figure 5). The volcanic deposits are described as the Lower—Middle Eocene Crescent Formation, consisting of basalt. The Unconsolidated Sediments are described as glacial till, comprised of coarse-textured gravelly and stony materials. 3.2-Site Geology The project site is characterized by steep timbered slopes with elevations of 120-800 feet above sea level. The existing Penny Creek Quarry and recently acquired county quarry adjacent to Penny Creek Quarry reveal significant mineral resources. A survey of the site found approximately 180 feet of basalt exposed on the existing Penny Creek Quarry highwall (elevation 123 to 304 mean sea level msl). In addition there is approximately 159 feet of basalt exposed (141 to 300 feet msl) in the recently acquired county quarry. Both of these quarries reveal basalt material consistent with the geologic units described on the DNR geologic map referenced above. Based on geomorphic features located on site and immediately to the north, west and southwest of the existing Penny Creek Quarry, it appears that the volcanic deposit is predominate throughout the area. Further evidence of this basalt formation is revealed by outcroppings within the proposed and surrounding area. Rock is also observed Geologic&Economic Report 3 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 MAY - 1 2003 approximately 1.5 feet below ground surface in road cuts within the proposed MRL expansion area. 4 - ECONOMICS 4.1—Accessibility The existing quarry and proposed MRL expansion area fronts on Penny Creek Road approximately 1,000 feet southwest of the intersection with State Route 101. Penny Creek Road is a county road with an asphalt surface to the existing quarry. 4.2—Permitted Surface Mines With In Jefferson County DNR's Directory of Washington Mines, 2001, Information Circular 94, identifies 14 permitted surface mining operations in Jefferson County. Only 4 of these mines are basalt or "shot rock" (hard rock) quarries; the others are sand and gravel pits. Three of the basalt quarries are located between 10 and 12 miles (direct line) northeast of Penny Creek Quarry. The fourth is located near the mouth of the Hoe River approximately 4 miles east of the Pacific Ocean coast. Mining has been ongoing by various operators at the Penny Creek Quarry since the late 1940's providing a important source of basalt material to eastern Jefferson County and as far north as Port Angeles and west to Poulsbo. 4.3—Size of Basalt Deposit There appears to be a very large deposit of basalt in vicinity of the subject property. It is estimated with the 37 acre expansion area that the proposed Penny Creek mine would be capable of producing 8-14 million tons of marketable product. The mining operation would extract basalt in benches using a cut slope method of mining to a maximum depth ranging 100-150 feet below ground surface. These volumes are based on the assumption that only 46 acres would be mined; the remainder of the site would be used for perimeter setbacks, overburden and topsoil storage for reclamation, processed material storage, and the processing area. These volumes are only estimates;they will fluctuate with variations in specific density of the rock,depth and method of mining. 5.0 - CONCLUSION Based on geologic information, physical inventory and economic factors presented above, it is our opinion that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area contains a sizable volume of valuable basalt and other mineral resources that can be economically extracted, processed and delivered to job sites in the historic market area in a commercially competitive fashion. We believe the expansion area meets the criteria to be considered a "highly desirable" deposit per Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Matrix for Assessing Lands for Designation as Mineral Resource Lands. Due to the quality of the geologic deposit on the site and access to State Route 101, the product can be marketed to assorted projects in the county. The Penny Creek Quarry has been in Geologic&Economic Report 4 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 operation for over 50 years demonstrating that there is a market for the materials produced at the mine. The potential volume of materials that can be produced from this site is sizable and will continue to provide a valuable resource throughout the county. i1 _ ' r 1 ±11 . �� il 'aj ; MAY - 1 2003 tY rwp t.OF-..t' .... . ... . Geologic&Economic Report 5 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 REFERENCES • Washington State Department of Natural Resources(DNR)Geologic Map of Washington —Northwest Quadrant, Washington Department of Natural Resourcess,Directory of Washington Mines, 2001. Information Circular 94. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket DCD Staff Report&DSEIS, 2002. Matrix for Assessing Lands for Designation as Mineral Resource Lands. Jefferson County Community Development, Unified Development Code, Adopted 2000, amended 2002. United States Department of Agriculture,Soil Survey Jefferson County Area, Washington, 1975. ti • • MAY - 1 2003 _ ; . Geologic&Economic Report 6 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 LIMITATIONS The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. There are no other warranties, express or implied. The services preformed were consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is prepared solely for the use of our client and may not be used or relied upon by a third party for any purpose. Any such use or reliance will be at such party's risk. The opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when services were performed. Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) is not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards,practices, or regulations after the date of this report. ELS does not warrant the accuracy of supplemental information incorporated in this report that was supplied by others. fr I `� .d 1,1 MAY - 1 2003 ; • Geologic&Economic Report 7 Ecological Land Services,Inc. Penny Creek Quarry April 29,2003 °VI WHATCON WASHINGTON r. �'�' ""IKAGn- ... K 11.16-iicsill Ran CUM-LAM 41 47d 48'53"Latitiude - - s0 ..". '� 122d 54'34"Longitude MASON/� +�i .Yr,! LOCATION MAP r� -.--- 1 ``��� �•• � IQHG -......... Qom, .' y � +�.. R2 V c��.! - "as , �� R"�<< ,,.... B 1 L J .THURSTON w ` IrAple/011f :VI;i I SF'' ---lig PI° . 27 I�r,; W ---, N I m ) -\, c"-"'" SKAMANlA .m ac - Nate I"ss 31 38 .::. PROJECT , -' ttli -- VICINITY MAP tsr,-, i , , • 771 / J t . IL, ----0,- . -- WV"- : fay, ‘\.,11ri.,./ / ..--) 15 /-*I.--driP11 i ....t4 ..- --.-• .1 • •.,, .4i, 13. 1 3 , F 1 C' (r t...,.1 j \ 1\';}.._ate: 1 ; yf"",1•=�--` _ Ni; •t°'= 1¢i {.ri'.- \ - s) U . I I f 1 .V' 4 ��i+� / "--•, j • tom' -a J \ ,�° — _ ..••" •. •OM]ft_..._._ -v,?^'..`ik • •Pfir',L1 \ � • y aawx w I▪ .~ - ( M ' w • •41' ' - / 1 I -. yyl i � `'� SST f �' �i�•�. r� 3.--.- t�' � �� f 1' 4 • r �\ •� „„.„.\:.,..\\,..,..,,‘„ �- �lI' , (:. /,,\, ;1 r I . , /t„s1 1! \ \\ -���/ ♦ --' f l--- I 'l� •:,. l G•.*.: 44:t• kt .,,,,, „ 1 . .. , _ ° - i , !r 11 /;' . 'a .;/ - '\ '%# r'--'4. . \\\�^t� *.r t r 1�7',. r`,`�; ' r i fit? I� I �'� ' .I — i/ i(�j(y�. `,\ ',, f 7.„«___ ` \,, , C , I, , �- t r r + 1 .t '14.,,,-;\\:• 111 ;-k!'. 1:' I1 .. 1 1 4 ,'I I K '' / - 1 /'t l �•_./ i, r f I �rq.. `• .. r\ � -- :.— / R - 9MP. .. y 0 I w 1/ Ia...h --1�f /F ,.t !I r� J \`I' �Fe.1...".....,N. :` ,∎ . I 1j 1 :i�1 •, f s -r - 14 f - , I• I '"I.�F..rLy,'"* 8 'y, \. � rir I ,^ti.�. ''•T .._ - w ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 4/2003 Figure 1 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Site Location Map AND LAND PLANNING DWN. MM Penny Creek Quarry 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. PM 450 Penny Creek Road Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 22,T27N, R2W,W.M. (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 REVIS. 4-29-03 USERVER\Company\Jefferson CountylPenny Creek Quarry\Site Vicinity Map.dwg,04/3012003 02:01:35 PM,1:1 ,. a x W( t1 `� k .a, ' ,�t`1�i ` l ,." r'1 ,'..f,..' .1 ( +, 5 ( t i c '',c.`"' f r j', ,,,p4A. 'T t/} xi �y ,S "/ (� tY,fI f} .,f ,. 4, .2/Y ,'.f 2/R �,.l�S�. st"r'4',41)..;A.,-.,' 1 df J j' (J',,.,"i+f ',3, SL x"..r a''i,44;e4:11#�4'"y'fi` ‘,,,441,:,,,,:'..?:,-.,,'''"rf.r g j' ,x `,� ", -; y ;�t� L,- S�yY`�Y� i,Yt r i � y 3,, ��f x r .� :'' . ; # tJ '11:• .'•411(.1..1.'''to ) h x F S� F i d. y r `^ -i „> rf ti+ ),,,,';'''4'',..„ iYr •,) �t t_;`Jf t1**.. ,','�1, { ` { '9"J-�� i � i� 1 J. '� ,tY�.��:1� i �4 � � + ~b ' ,� �'+�. J r{r� �4:-. Y,. s' X - y v- J � r• 1, 1u ' Sr �y � 1,'F' . ( — �'. .+�rf��' .fit t�i � w ... e'`�-�31J Z rt�`r:4ti {r, •.x t._ 4 �r a � „..y IBC $ .y /• .. F t ''. ) ,'': .4 .nn _} ; ,2/H . " ,7 f r�'t, a �;. -,-;';;-7';;:, "r ,. i �..�1 . .. it” ?!f - .. p�_ *.i „: * . : -: , • -*::-,.. . ' ' .,.' lif:";- ;Al.,'..:4> :"*.;: '.* '. . . ' ' .✓ 'S 'b. !'4'yf it .":t :A _-'j , # r� r4( a';. � . - "• .% l r- ♦ ik 4 4- .' Ji 4 .1‘1 F a .. �. -4 x li I 0 1200 2400 -- �_� MAY 1 2003 ' -:'I APPROXIMATE SC IN FEET Project Number 897.01 ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 2/2003 Figure 2 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING 1997 Aerial Photo AND LAND PLANNING DWN. MM Creek Road Penny Creek Quarry 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. PM 450 Penny Cr Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 23,T27N, R2W,W. (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 M. REVIS. 2-11-03 Project Number 897.01 1 i i 1 gleil . hips 14111 I NO i P1111/g v4 x4 f - iir 1 11F N 114 z iv. , Pi' 10 ' ilq li 104 i!''l if g§ E t . r 42 I? ,-_ ‘c I ' gl 1 i■ ii Igil E 1*6 - dig • t 5 i\A" Olis 14 jai >i R 1 if ! 1 lir > t It far qpI . E Nil) :nom lirm >I f L\ I % \ s P li hill 444 i \\, I . dE ill 111 iMg vipg pilii 11N ilihi I1 ooimPt laim 2 ib. 011 '''' i ii IfN Iiiisi IS 1 707 1;11:1 a y !hi ‘ igfri 114/ illiP° hi ;a il \ 1 11 '- E i I ''‘ . ......_ I' 'Ib \ hip, z 111 rg Pill _____ E ,t, ‘ ;phi N 1IIIII CC V � X w i 1 Oa S'ef 3 1 i pill Pill rill blifili 111 plIfl gafff/ 0 g 1 g 9 Ogi a i 1 1 Ir , / 06 Of $ f > 1 0 -A a rs i 14 1 li 3 i 1 1 61 Itadpi E - I fall! ' ...; ,,1 0 r, / hi . , - 1 a f.4-1 alit 1-1 li>11 cii V" V . . , 6 V N f bb 0 `0 • o "0 D mcn .8 W/Mh--7/1//M-1/■ .::i 21 ' ,':7:H i 1 f P 1 [iiii; 1 IVI ii i >0 0 p H. . 4.1, _:.....7 , . „... ..., ....L . , I ' . i if !id i , _. . , 1 1 iy11 i 01 1 ---' iii 11 1 * 4 I P ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES,.INC. DATE 42003 Figure 3 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING • Property Ownership Map AND LAND PLANNING DM Mm-- Penny Creek Quarry 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. R— 450 Penny Creek Road Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 22,T27N, R2W,W.M. (360)578-1371 Fax:(380)414-9305 REVIS.430-03 { iroject 01 4g1 8 1111111111111111111r 61,-) 00 6(90 sa) ',0 moo s SI640 �o 611 00 180 111111411111 , `'gyp t‘ mop op tLIIS 4111 11 Illik lk ti -0 0 ap � m -o - 90 C L m AilL , Z II III 1 4 1 11 I\I ri al : v-D Illiam ioA 414%1 c ________ 1....___ __40— �o� Z � o 0 X _..../........_ : > HI p 11 i u § c$,, III _, m 1, ,„ i 4 • —1 % , co 0 4 il -1, 0 Oli til , IT; O ` - j dye ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 4/2003 Figure 4 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Pre-Mining Topography AND LAND PLANNING DWN. ___MM__ Penny Creek Quarry ' ' `'�j; 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. RG 450 Penny Creek Road ==' Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 22,T27N, R2W,W.M. — '' REVIS.4-30 03 1"- (360)578-1371 Fax(360)414-9305 u L; • :,I.N, p. ` ��. s.• — �+ - .• III * , W : ae . 4 . ../. :, , . .,` to -- . E...'•. .1 >:,.tom: :...:-:..-.v,1,i, 1,.p,;: ,;i, '•,i. , , Q ile-• .. ' • Ogt, '.. \......, ti is- - .i ,,. i,. -t ii," -•:\ S e v O1 ; •• ,t4 / IWItoi-C11. R I. ., .:• • lip liklli 0b ., • .. ,/ /i 4-407x ,..*.dw- , :,-14 `c ' . d'r ...; ,: _ / • <, Ern.2 r • ( . i • % i‘ ''‘ ,.4"g • i J., • / , , IL* zio- Ills ) 7. • (..s.. 01 J •\ I t " t`i. , !' i v 4! Legend of Geologic Formations in the vicinity of Penny Creek O ` I I I i1 Evc=Crecent Formation Basalt(project location) I ti '.,I MAY — 2003 i i Qgt=Glacial Till Qgo =Glacial Outwash,undifferentiated ' Qa=Nonglacial Alluvium Em2=Marine Sedimentary Rocks ' ? ECOLOGICAL LAND SERVICES, INC. DATE 4/2003 Figure 5 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING Geologic Map AND LAND PLANNING DWN. MM Penny Creek Quarry 1339 Commerce Ave.,Suite 311 APPR. PM 450 Penny Creek Road Longview,WA 98632 Portion of Section 23,T27N, R2W,W.M. (360)578-1371 Fax:(360)414-9305 REVIS. 4-30-03 11SERVER1Company\JeBerson County\Penny Creek Quarry\Figure 5 Geologic Map.dwg,04130/2003 02:23:50 PM,1:1 s • Penny Creek Quarry j MAY - 1 2003 Mineral Resource Land Overlay Expansion L. Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) 3.6.3.1 f requires that all proposed Mineral Resource Land (MRL) Overlay Districts "Are not within a regulated or fish and wildlife habitat area pursuant to Section 3.6.8 and 3.6.9 of this Code". Wetlands The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL overlay area is not located within or adjacent to jurisdictional wetlands. ELS staff visited the site January, February and March 2003 and determined that no jurisdictional wetlands are located within the proposed MRL area. These findings are consistent with the National Wetland Inventory and Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey for Jefferson County which indicate no wetlands or hydric soils are located within the proposed expansion area or adjoining property. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) maps and reports were obtained from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) on March 13, 2003. In addition, a letter from Jeff Davis—WDFW Area Habitat Biologist to Jefferson County expressed concerns for a number of species that are thought or known to exist in the vicinity of the existing Penny Creek Quarry and MRL expansion area. Northern Spotted Owl(Strix occidentalis): Habitat Needs: Northern spotted owls generally reside in old forest habitat with an abundance of snags and downed logs. The subject site is not within a "spotted owl special emphasis area" (SOSEA) as defined in WAC 222-16-086. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: WDFW has identified the subject site as being within spotted owl management circles — established territory based on a 2.7-mile radius drawn around an established site center. Not all of the land within a management circle is automatically considered spotted owl habitat, the land must meet certain criteria specifically applicable to spotted owls. According to WAC 222- 16-085, suitable spotted owl habitat is categorized into (1) old forest habitat, (2) sub- mature habitat and young forest marginal habitat, and (3) dispersal habitat. There is no old forest habitat within or adjacent to the subject site. It appears that portions of the site may have (by definition) sub-mature habitat, young forest marginal habitat, and dispersal habitat. Most of the site has been logged within the past 40 years resulting in the oldest stand of timber aged at 35 to 40 years. Adjacent properties 1 2003 #� MAY -i.� . . have also been actively logged including clear-cuts immediately north of the subject site and a more recent clear-cut on the subject property. Based on past and projected timber harvest activities, adjacent properties will likely continue to be managed for timber production with 40-year average harvest rotations. State Route 101 State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road) are located between the subject site and documented habitat east, west and south of the subject site. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that expansion of the MRL zoning overlay to the subject 37 acres abutting the existing Penny Creek Quarry will impact populations of northern spotted owls. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus): Habitat Needs: Bald eagles generally nest in live trees within direct sight distance of water(Watson, 2001). One documented bald eagle nest site is located approximately V. mile southwest of the proposed MRL expansion area (WDFW, 2003). There are also three documented roost sites within a mile of the expansion area, with the closest approximately 1/3 mile southwest of the subject site(WDFW, 2003). Bald eagles are listed as a threatened species in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed MRL expansion and anticipated mining area does not have habitat(open water forage areas or potential nesting trees) preferred by bald eagles. Most of the site has been logged within the past 40 years resulting in the oldest stand of timber aged at 35 to 40 years,with a recent clear-cut of the eastern portion. Adjacent properties have also been actively logged including recent clear-cuts immediately north of the subject site. SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road) are located between the subject site and documented habitat east, west and south of the subject site. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area impacting populations of bald eagles. Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus): Habitat Needs: Marbled murrelets generally nest in mature old-growth forests with a multi-layered canopy near saltwater where they feed on small fish and crustaceans (WDW, 1991). A documented marbled murrelet occupancy site is located approximately 7,200 feet (1.4 miles) south of the subject site (WDFW, 2003). Marbled murrelets are listed as a threatened species in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area does not have habitat (old-growth coniferous forest) preferred by marbled murrelets. WAC 222-16-010 states that suitable marbled murrelet habitat Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 2 a I MAY — 1 2003 ._�+, • !... means a contiguous forested area containing trees capable of providing nesting opportunities with all of the following: 1. Within 50 miles of marine waters; 2. At least 40% of the dominant and codominant trees are Douglas-fir, western hemlock,western red cedar or Sitka spruce; 3. Two or more nesting platforms per acre; 4. At least 7 acres in size, including the contiguous forested area within 300 feet of nesting platforms, with similar forest stand characteristics (age, species composition, forest structure) to the forested area in which the nesting platforms occur. Forest habitat within and adjacent to the sul4ject site does not meet the four criteria listed above. Most of the site has been logged within the past 40 years resulting in the oldest stand of timber aged at 35 to 40 years, with portions recently clear-cut. Adjacent properties have also been actively logged including clear-cuts immediately north of the subject site within the last two years. SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road(County Road) are located between the subject site and potential murrelet habitat west and south of the subject site. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion impacting populations of marbled murrelets. Osprey(Pandion haliaetus): Habitat Needs: Ospreys generally nest near water where they feed almost exclusively on live fish they capture near the surface of the water (WDW, 1991). Osprey nests are made from sticks placed atop trees, snags, utility poles, wooden piles, or any other structure that provides unrestricted access to nearby waters. A documented osprey nest is located approximately 2,700 feet southeast of the subject site (WDFW, 2003). Ospreys are not listed as a threatened or endangered species in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by osprey. No ponds, lakes, streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the project footprint. The nearest potential habitat for osprey is Penny Creek (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road(County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which serves as the main thoroughfare on the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site,there is a very low likelihood of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and anticipated mining impacting populations of osprey. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 3 it MAY - 1 2003 ' I Wood Duck(Aix sponsa): Habitat Needs: Wood ducks prefer wetland areas associated with streams or rivers with adequate cover, nesting opportunities, and forage (Bellrose, 1994). Another important habitat for wood ducks is small ponds, including beaver ponds and livestock ponds if adequate cover and forage is available. Generally wood ducks nest, feed and reside in areas within one mile from water sources including streams, rivers, lakes, and ponds. Wood ducks have been documented using areas in the vicinity of the subject site(WDFW, 2003). Wood ducks are not listed as a threatened or endangered species in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by wood ducks. No wetlands, ponds, lakes, streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the subject property boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for wood ducks is Penny Creek (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road(County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the primary thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and anticipated mining would impact populations of wood ducks. Harlequin Duck(Histrionicus histrionicus): Habitat Needs: Harlequin ducks winter along the Pacific Coast, preferring fast flowing streams with forested riparian areas lacking human disturbance (WDF 1991). Harlequins nest on the ground and are highly susceptible to disturbance, generally leaving areas once they are disturbed. Adults usually reside and forage along rocky shorelines feeding on crustaceans, aquatic insects, and mollusks. Harlequin ducks have been documented using areas in the vicinity of the subject site (WDFW, 2003). Harlequin ducks are listed as a species of concern in Washington. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by Harlequin ducks. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the project footprint. The nearest potential habitat for Harlequin ducks is Penny Creek(1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River(1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 4 1 .1 MAY - 1 2003 suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood of the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area and anticipated mining impacting populations of Harlequin ducks. Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): Habitat Needs: Chinook salmon are the largest anadromous salmon along the coast of Washington. Adults spawn from late summer to late fall in larger streams with adequate gravel and well-oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Juvenile Chinook begin migrating to sea in the spring but can stay in freshwater up to a year before entering saltwater. Chinook salmon have been documented in Big Quilcene River and Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003 and Streamnet, 2003). The Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit of Chinook salmon is listed as threatened. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by Chinook salmon. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the subject property boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for Chinook Salmon is Penny Creek(1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well- established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and anticipated mining will impact populations of Chinook salmon. Coho Salmon(Oncorhvnchus kisutch): Habitat Needs: Coho salmon are very important to the commercial and recreational fishing industries in Washington. Adults spawn from late summer to late fall in small streams with adequate gravel and well-oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Juvenile coho stay in freshwater for over a year before entering saltwater. Coho salmon have been documented in Big Quilcene River and Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003 and Streamnet, 2003). The Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Evolutionary Significant Unit of coho salmon is listed as a candidate population. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by Coho salmon. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the subject property boundary. The nearest potential habitat for Coho Salmon is Penny Creek (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 5 l " ; i ;i MAY - 1 2003. 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways Li are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion or anticipated mining would impact populations of coho salmon. Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta): Habitat Needs: Chum salmon adults spawn from late summer to late fall in the lower reaches of coastal streams with adequate gravel and well-oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Juvenile chum stay in freshwater for only a short period of time and are usually gone from freshwater before June 1. Chum salmon have been documented in Big Quilcene River (WDFW, 2003 and Streamnet, 2003). The Hood Canal Evolutionary Significant Unit of chum salmon is listed as threatened. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area boundary is physically removed from habitat preferred by Chum salmon. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the project footprint. The nearest potential habitat for Chum Salmon is Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). The Big Quilcene River is separated from the subject site from SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which us the primary thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site,there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area and anticipated mining would impact populations of chum salmon. Pink Salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha): Habitat Needs: Pink salmon adults return to spawn at the age of two years and in Hood Canal only return on odd years. Pink salmon need streams with adequate gravel and well-oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Juvenile pink salmon stay in freshwater for only a few months before entering saltwater in the spring. Pink salmon have been documented in the Big Quilcene River(WDFW,2003 and Streamnet, 2003). Pink salmon are not listed as an endangered or threatened species in the state of Washington. 4 Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by pink salmon. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the MRL expansion boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for pink salmon is the Big Quilcene River Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 6 MAY - 1 2003 • (1,000 feet south of the site). The Big Quilcene River is separated from the subject ri site by either of both SR 101 (State Highway)and Penny Creek Road(County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site,there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area and anticipated mining would impact populations of pink salmon. Searun Cutthroat Trout(Oncorhynchus clarki clarki): Habitat Needs: Searun cutthroat trout are the anadromous form of the resident cutthroat trout found throughout Washington. After hatching, juveniles reside in freshwater for up to three years before migrating to saltwater. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Searun cutthroat trout have been documented in the Big Quilcene River (WDFW, 2003). Searun cutthroat trout are not listed as an endangered or threatened species in Washington State. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek mining area is physically removed from habitat preferred by searun cutthroat trout. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the expansion area boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for searun cutthroat trout is the Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). The Big Quilcene River is separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road(County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic. Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site,there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area and resulting mining would impact populations of searun cutthroat trout. Resident Cutthroat Trout(Oncorhynchus clarki): Habitat Needs: Resident cutthroat trout are found throughout small clear streams of Washington. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Resident cutthroat trout have been documented in the Big Quilcene River and Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003). Resident cutthroat trout are not listed as an endangered or threatened species in Washington State. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by resident cutthroat trout. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the MRL expansion area boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for resident cutthroat trout is Penny Creek Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion. Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 7 MAY - 1 2003, (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the ! site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion area and anticipated mining activity would impact populations of resident cutthroat trout. Steelhead(Oncorhvnchus mykiss): Habitat Needs: Steelhead are the anadromous form of rainbow trout and are highly valued by sport anglers. Adults spawn in streams with adequate gravel and well- oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Juvenile steelhead can stay in freshwater up to three years before entering saltwater. Steelhead have been documented in Big Quilcene River and Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003 and Streamnet, 2003). Steelhead are not listed as a threatened or endangered species in the Puget Sound area. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by steelhead. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the expansion area boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for steelhead is Penny Creek (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River (1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and resulting mining activity would impact populations of steelhead. Rainbow Trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss): Habitat Needs: Rainbow trout are a resident fish valued by sport anglers. Adults spawn in streams with adequate gravel and well-oxygenated water. Generally streams must be clear and cold with well-established riparian areas that provide shade and large woody debris. Rainbow trout have been documented in Big Quilcene River and Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003). Rainbow trout are not listed as a threatened or endangered species. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek MRL expansion area is physically removed from habitat preferred by rainbow trout. No streams or rivers are Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services, Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 8 MAY - 1 2003 located within or immediately adjacent to the expansion area boundaries. The nearest potential habitat for rainbow trout is Penny Creek (1,300 feet southwest of the site) and Big Quilcene River(1,000 feet south of the site). Penny Creek and Big Quilcene River are separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well-established and traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and resulting mining activities would impact populations of rainbow trout. Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus):. Habitat Needs: Channel catfish are found in clear lakes, reservoirs and streams throughout Washington. Adults spawn in sheltered areas under logs or low hanging banks. Channel catfish can live more than 14 years and weigh more than 25 pounds at full maturity. Channel catfish have been documented in Penny Creek (WDFW, 2003). Channel catfish are not listed as a threatened or endangered species. Potential Impact From Mining: The proposed Penny Creek mining area is physically removed from habitat preferred by channel catfish. No streams or rivers are located within or immediately adjacent to the project footprint. The nearest potential habitat for channel catfish is Penny Creek(1,300 feet southwest of the site). Penny Creek is separated from the subject site by either or both SR 101 (State Highway) and Penny Creek Road (County Road). Both of these roadways are well- established and heavily traveled, especially SR 101 which is the main thoroughfare serving the eastern Olympic Peninsula. Given the physical setting of the subject site and the absence of suitable habitat within or immediately adjacent to the subject site, there is a very low likelihood that the Penny Creek Quarry MRL expansion and resulting mining activity would impact populations of channel catfish. References Belirose, F.C. and D.J. Holm. 1994. Ecology and Management of the Wood Duck. Stackpole Books. 588 pages. Pollard, W.R., G.F. Hartman, C. Root&P. Edgell. 1997. Field Identification of Coastal Juvenile Salmonids. 32 pages. Streamnet. April 28,2003. Internet Website: www.streamnet.org. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. March 13, 2003. Habitats and Species Report in the Vicinity of T27R02W Section 12. Report and Map. Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 9 .I Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Marine Fish Identification Guide - Volume I, Anadromous Sport Fish Identification Guide — Volume II, and Freshwater Sport Fish Identification Guide— Volume III. Washington Department of .Wildlife. 1991. Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitat and Species. Watson, J.W. and E.A. Rodrick. 2001. Volume IV: Birds — Bald Eagle. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. i1 ..: ..� '.I... I` • MAY - 1 2003 • Penny Creek Quarry MRL Overlay Expansion Ecological Land Services,Inc. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Impacts—UDC 3.6.3.1.f May 1,2003 Page 10 4 A d cO 4' 6 JE1411+1LRSON COUNTY - ; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'I 1 APR 3 0 2003 ,.,,.,�. ,„ 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax i_.._._... ww.co.jefferson.wa.us w ' Application for Formal Site-Specific • - Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment' MLA# AtAVO,3 ZZS PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: �a�' ( WY}e Phi�-la ti Applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community development by May 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during this year's amendment process. Please note that, beginning in 2004, the application submittal deadline will be February 1 of each calendar year. Completed applications that are received after deadline will be placed on the docket for the following calendar year. Applications that are incomplete (i.e., that do not include all of the information required below)will be returned to the applicant. Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application and SEPA Checklist (if applicable). Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2. A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 3. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee (as applicable), as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance,as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the following: a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred(500)feet of the site;and _ c. The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of the site. 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit B,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any.associated development proposal(s), if applicable. Applications for project-related formal site-specific redesignations must inckxle plans, and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and Imp err> . Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assn to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 7. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit"C,"a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within tOrb general vicinity [i.e., within a three hundred (300)-foot radius]. The exhibit must depict topography, wetlands ibuffers, easements and their purpose, and means of access to the site. The intent of the exhibit is to clearly i to the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. 1 See UDC Section 9.4. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.311/2003 Page 1 w , 8. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed.(Attach additional sheets,if necessary.) I.0..W% Seek i;i49 4o rez©Itie subject po per4-c1 41,144 CC-80 1 4.0 4 . make, i-E- poss i b . 40 but Id d tMe r kel brAu-, .Por addifi oval dkfai Is t please sew i'- -GA ki� I- C . 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is: (!O wt 119. eici .R YeS+- Bo, 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is: all val - ores+- 40. 11. The current use of the site is: K•VE4 (a 12. The proposed use of the site is: S(14.9 le PapA t Iy Romig. 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required, please prepare and label as "Exhibit D," proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in bill"format,with text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts (e.g., stdkeeuts). 14. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit E," a rough explanation of how the proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals,if any,meet,conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? c. How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? _ `-. , d. Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? o e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other Ir. than transportation (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general .i.., governmental services)? y ' 4 f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals,policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of > Mil r the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? .: i ttr.,„....::;, LA- g. Will the facilities,utilities,parks in a loron features that cannot be mitigated?transportation network,capital •3 a e3h. Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? C G is How is the sub j ect parcel(s)physically y suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development including,but not limited to the following: (I) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? j. Will the proposal,If adopted,create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties?If the answer is yes,how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole? SITE SPECIFIC nPP.DOC REV.3/11/2003 Page 2 { k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? 1. If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County, and other applicable inter-jurisdictional policies or agreements,and any other local,state or federal laws? 15. The applicant hereby certifies that the statements contained in this application are true and provide an accurate representation of the proposed amendment;and the applicants)hereby acknowledges that any approval Issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. 1k' ¢/x/eo APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE • dekiiit/ 4il, 4/ 03 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures, representative authorization is required if application is not signed by the owner.] • • APR 3 • SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.3/11/2003 Page 3 F.-Xi/ail-A-1 Map cke amt Je, erso✓ Gokrty sho LAN kg parrot I S .. - bt 1 -' � 1(i _ S I iV. t AI 1 C ( 4•_ r %':(41 t - -`' "^ 1 ` f i 4111°1". 4.0.0•Til I rek,..vi- g 400 2 �f r - a TA em i Q a_ t s ,.„ s , . . _ 1 :11 ,,: :.... ,,..: ii.:.: .ii ..:::: ..-, :r.,-,• 111 11 1 APR 3 0 2003 . ii . APR 3 0 2003 _J 1 Exhi bi4-A-2 CO co c Map of coup j 'zohiri3 wi-I-17 subject- prvpet-y •• • • • • • • O • • - 4011,_-• '_ „,..., wow.. .......—$C....,44...Om'.. • r i jei>,_„, 1�y....... ,i.., .. , 8 l7 so P% `h. . _ W . •: i I • • . • • r' • • ow I e I.A, co 1 _‘iingigionic\.\ • \ •..._ . ,.. ., . ..t.\\\.\ \ !I y7 8. 1 OA ..... lik lia 0 ) •. \ '� \ -3: r , \ el \-.. in i \. • . :v • d • 0 , y • • fir, • 1`1 1 APR 302003 i - 1 refirit,,A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Pa ft Re-zone, Pe(-anon 2. Name of applicant: DO Pt rick A4, Pa t 1 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.o. 80x 6513¢. , Po rf Litoi/ow , cat 9$365 -oi3- ; 4. Date cheddist prepared: A p rill Z6, 7163 5. Agency requesting checklist: Je eY o unspu n 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasingr , ifapolice ) t9e c4j W I'tl CO`n,pi- dekamt -ro w� 1 iH utk 1da4 ear ; if success ,{ , pro po f wt 1 butte( a �pp�,o� ov► s%(� SEPA Environmental C7ieckl 5+111111/ 1(47' Page 1 ;II APR 30 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. 04-her -I.% 44,e. ab i I i- 4o b ui Id a. howie scor bro4Qlet- av►ct his camil on Gt,e. Sim ho. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Psb4- applicable. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. 4ssui41111 1hak `the Pe-4141011 is 0P Proved Teferso4 Coue bvi rs1. 04i4 se,p*c✓ Per'PIIh Wig be resv creel 4 a 4-I-u re ko v5e • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Tkt5 Is a peg-t fiot 4, rez Ke 5v6,0 pro Pell-ti -From Commerc:4a1 fore,, ! 80 40 Rural t o -e5* I ;40 . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist Gov Lof I CPI Sechea 6 , Tou)b 5ktpi za , Rai; I E 4 sib wictp is Q kect , See hilbi4- A-2. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. islij SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 'll APR 3 0 2003 b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? I. ---_ •ApPracrmctfely 45° c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Clad ,atild,g tee/ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. applicable f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. IVo g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? < IX IC flow* is constructed h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: Ad(H e r e -r c'-1 y 4o Jegersoil C o vk b al tot(k r v i revl4e, s IT a bui ldil per-rnif is Issued r side iy a.Alr re• a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. (; e rezone p l-ihovr is su:ccess44 wict a house is bui U-, +he.4 is a possibiltfy &f consfrvci-ton dust.The. house w�tf ha,Ue a. wood-burr►ii.tg slow. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: 3. Water a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 ik_. �: .. i '; APR 3 0 2003 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)then described - waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. lb 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Nc+ applicable- 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. A)o 5)Do the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 143 b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. l� rezoi'ied , an adds-tonal well Gull( be, nteded Cyr ho use cc'ns'-r o&i pp r J rsrson Coo per ids . 2)Describe waste material mat 11 be discharged into the groun from se is tarns or other sources,if any(for example:domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. l� rezohuct, a,i,► addi'tror��l sep'i• s y s+eni Will be 14Wk1 4t- 'vase 001451-rvc;h a per $ff.u.soh Co will per144i1-s . c. Water runoff(inducting storm 1)Describe the source of runoff(Including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. AbF applicable 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. 11b d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: Not applicable SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 . i ' APR 3 0 2003 4. Plants 1 ' l A a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: V deciduous tree: aid map = aspen,other L. ■.' evergreen tree. fi 4 ceda ,pine,other rtiododehd ronS NI shrubs sal al , - berry �—grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulirush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation CtiAct C4 e,l-- liC&I Ved v21 "k b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 64- a.ppIicable c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. hbne. know" d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: No , vet rove has be a A wi t t be, promo d. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hero ea l on�bi other: mammals• d elk,beaver,other fish: bass,sa mon rout,herring,shellfish,other: hone,. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Now- kiloton c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. k + 40 our kno wled&e. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: Presveve ol 1 tt ve.9e hoin aS possib lP 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. This Pel -hon 1.5 for a mane owty . SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 ;fIIi s;; • .I APR 302003 i_ b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?.If so, generally describe. IVO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: Tiel(s is a pe i-Pion ,fo r rezehe opt( . 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, NO describe. 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. rin kb+ "pPltCab� 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: � CY P�tc - a61- b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indicate what noise would come hours zo is sms-vl , Shod— -Ferwl cok ' �i^uC�1oh kip t5ei 15 expel wi4-h home consfrochoh 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts,if any: 8. Land a dshoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? This law( t5 used 4or Y:✓crea)f cove . (ov Lot Z (E J) i 49 son /e; -.641;19 home st*e. Ofheus cft commercial or i^u rad To ree b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. NO SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 :i ..,' , f. APR 302003 c. Describe any structures on the site. 1 ker are- dwo covered 54rucivres ''or rec tomaa /P►cyitc use d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? kb e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 6144114e4cAa c,vest 1=8o f. What Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 8300 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 64, app1Iatele h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. Un khowh i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed • reZvwe IS SU.CCess-i t i , .br i t • 4 wou,id Yes tile 41 , J. 0 a v ki 1 sea�ov�a I� vycsi 'a,v�t t wtevwb€s . 1• Approwm ny peop wou the com displace kb k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Kbl4° I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any. 0b4111. 14 all mece5sa.ry pet-ri1 i S CtS rect ui via( by 4-61 .4-5014 Co 0143 • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low- ( housing. � approved, 4.,h plcu4 is 4o build ome stru# --e-a wtic'!j resider b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. Norte- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Novte SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 i t G1 § I APR 3 0 2003 10. Aesthetics • r: • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building materials)proposed? tinknow`i cbt its 'kme1, Mils is a mrovte pd+,on otilq b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Novle b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. W'--hat existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? YVO y►t�i d. y: Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Nome dedsigiaded b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: No 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. iW b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural rrimportance known to be on or next to the site. 'vC7� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: NOG► SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 )' .!111 t ` I ' APR 302003 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,If any. S wat45on vi lle Road . I-F iftzehe is S 0cce5s4tJ r (gyp rove 4e i 4o , caw( egklA6(014 o-f eexi st't dri-Lau,rm vu o cur, 3se £x i bid- C--(. b. Is site currently served by public sit? if not, i the app mate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Unknowv, a rta (4on6 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? tf so, generally describe. Mo f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. IJo+ k town a 4- .ts *i wee g. Proposed y. oposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if an Noitie. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. W reion►e IS 5 UCCeSSA.d police aid -Pl lv pi-of-whorl l for one add,ilhonaii 110wV-i mcri, sc hoo( d is-I-ric=,f by -Iwo b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,' any. Iwo SRPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 /!i-I'Ii II i �., e.ti APR 3 0 2003 • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service, telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. NO rte. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Tki5 is a pe -itcon ,or mu lie opt(( • 'its won cs stkccessfui -future- Pow►e bvi Idt'v►9 wit( Ye tui re pe v34/1.11 Pe-r" &C-Oe 'soh Cove. C. SIGNATURE Bu ld `��,,,,��,�,_� ,Y, The above answers are true and complete C . plate to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: OaN4a,„ /Its fiteL Date Submitted: 4%/°,� SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 APR 3 0 2003 thi bi- A-2 ,._• . e) m co 0) Mai of counj zoni�9 wi+h subject- propal • • 1 Il 1101 0 . _ ,_... =MO ..... ' ` 4`1�r ,yam-.er II { - r • ' ,,_trig 0 II 6 , - II Li II R •._ , f . . . • • • ca f:;411 V ef cz) ... ��� � yt ..._ __„„,, il CI t i „,0 ' r — .. 4-' ■ C r r � 0 „,, ,„,r ..,... g , 4 V �}} : 1• ;T ' r. __mg. R. , • •a ',%dm 14 ■ e to 0 .• Nir, • APR 302003 Lx.hi bil- C-1 .. • \\,,,,,,,, ,aio. ,eeoz....._..F.......i ..5' • .......41 ,..—... „II Str ' VP jit. . .. . . -..,.. 1 , 7'1.... :::: :..Y')..:. P W '4, ' :,SHELTER• r HOUSE AT SSI _ .i PALL .'''',#A‘* 4 111-A,... —'- --.4 ". ' HOW * ,� . •F- . g` ,t:T ' IIELTE 1 . .. . ....... .-- -,, ,...-rtz- cliiiiikiiis....,,,i:,,i:\:\ ‘ • C • • . //,'ifee,411.1) ' 14 • • 0 \\' \ 1 7 • ■ • c 07A? muot03 — • N co JEFFERSON COUNTY T !'``•r•Z ►, .`, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT !i� ) -- i I i I 1 l� � �► 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 j I I a o 2003 � 4 ci 360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax U u APR wvAv.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdeveloprnent ommdevelopment Master Land Use Permit Application Form _ �- r J {� - -, t;, PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number: BEI © ® ® ® C Subdivision Name: // Lot Number: Property Size: b 8.7¢ (acres/egelara feet) Existing Use of • . Site Address and/or Directions to Property: G33 S W 50111h'(k i f i / 1-o f z E a. APPU►CANT&OWNER 77ON tL,, Pall Applicant(if applicable): DO� ilA I Y16t . Pall Telephone: 360.+37. 2/77 Address: P.O. 8o)c 6513+ City: RW4 c-14d1 b yoNsr J� � Zip Code: 98M6. Email Address WInJP� )/ !y lj•COI Applicant's Signature: Property Owners)of Record: Telephone: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Email Address I acknowledge that the applicant above is applying for a building permit on my property. Owner's Signature: I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). (PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE) (DATE) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR Ac71vrrY(include separate sheets as necessary) • Sid —SpeCtTeic., cowlpmheststie pIoA4lubc awrewd,vie 4 cticu49e z414Iw3 -growl CF -8o 4o RI4O. [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements.An asterisk(*)indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. TvDe I Permits Weitz ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Bullding/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 72 ❑. Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 (OVER) MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.02/25/2002 • Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary'V or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1 El Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat,Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 ❑ Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional(Administrative)'C(a)'Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)'C(d)'Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) ❑ Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendbc C) ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Sbc Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.2 SEPA 8.10.12(b) Type III Permits ❑ Conditional'C"Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat,Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be In conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) ❑ Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development,Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.3 SEPA 8.10.12(c) Time IV Permits • ❑ Long Plat,Final UDC Section 7.4 i j ,_ _. II El PRRD,Final UDC Section 3.8.1 ,1 Type V Permits I 'I APR 3 0 f` ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3. .5 ❑ Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Lend Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment' ' Jar`- ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 - ❑ Appeal of SEPA UDC Section 8.10.12(d) Other Local.State or Federal Permits ❑ Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED] By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property.Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I knitter agree to save,fees and expenses which any accrue against Jefferson County ass a result of or in judgments, costs,reasonable attorney's consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections.This right of entry shall expire when the County(through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.Access and right of entry to the icant's property/ be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. 1. � -. � 4/3023 (PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the'Endangered Species Act"or'ESA.'Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA e&pIi this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. 4136/5 3 (PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) MASTER LAND USE PERMiT.DOC REV.02!25/2002 Map Output Page 1 of 1 . ectilbif A-3 1r_ ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map r — Legend • • Shoreline Photo: Map of cookriy zomilil wil-14 parce4 rivwtheirs wAct Towns SO 12jeCk PrO irel4y hilkfig lifect c) ....sc.. * Rini Centers irvf Road System i i Parceis-H •"'"ri ,......:.) ..— .7..1r.:. County Zoning r .. A AG-20 Imeme j '--*"T"' 1= _.:= 2:.../_; .,......,." •"..../." %,./7/ =- AIRPORT ' -*.---- --r- /// ••== III COM FOREST IG iti CROSSROADS CC 1 i i ----- 111 CROSSROADS-GC *MOM CROSSROAOS-NC ewer : wawa III • maw GLEN COVE%SC s, A11061011 MOWN /111 HEAVY INDOSTRNI . 1 "srm''°' =..::: 1 __.-_,.....,,tarearo (.0.-;;; 14110.11ING FOREST I 10,44■004 y.... .--- r--- IN UGHT INDUSTRIAL. - 1.14.1TAFtY RESERVA "al" ,SOISMON- III AIPR.MULTIFAMILY MIII .3 --L- M MPR-OPON SPACE 1 mag a l• ' ......1 •INOKONO.' ..NNS 11APRAC/CF MOM I 1"."" r"'"'"3 = MPR-FtECREATICO4 , I _ 1, is, S mr susater\ "1"101 .-e'.Amato \,.. r-----n, . , . N wasesw; 'Itatteue. MPR-SINGLE FAM TI onolow --..:.-_- , EN MPR-SPIGLE FAIALl 1111 tott.yLLAGE cern - - .... NATIONAL FOREST NATIONAL REFUGE I wows , 1 - --. PARKS AND RECRE, Ammo , , UNSI0011 14,\ PORT TOAINSENO t. , MOM ..m..... ,„,,— :' : 1 : •i L.----' s .77 -- ■ 1111 FAST RES BASED P. t + t - ;_ j t : , .--------, ",-'—' 110011110 „. IlbrYKOI III RURAL VILLAGE CO . - I , 0111111001 A 100111010 I i III RURAL FORF-,S1 40 ' sosomoot i ( ; l• - -- , , : C=:-=\,,,..„...._. , ....,MiC■0110 ' let4401 III RURAL RES 1-10 '., SWOOP Illteakt 44;710P-■ RURAL RES.1-20 i / i• I. ' ; I —...--,...r, , 080140■1 ------1 .---, RURAL R E S 1 S WOODS 116,00" 4b, IMMO, I UNKNOWN , 400111XV swum S 110"b045 I Ss•' WASTE rAcure A =..... ._-_-= MONS/ ;,s'''' a..K.11ft:41011 MOW* MOWN .11131400311 POW& I MMINgt / Hou RESERVATION / -1 OUINAULT RESERV/ N 1 NATIONAL PARK :t . 1 , . 1 ,, 1 APR 30 2oo3 . • — FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES dia.Y- Oefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and niakes no warranty with respec Icorrectn, ess or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. 1 Izoning information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made during th Comprehensive Plan amendment process.Zoning designations must be confirmed with the Department of Comm Develo ment http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=parcels_ou... 4/23/2003 . E4chibr-A4 • Vic may' Map of 5ubjec{- pro pev . Coukrfy zohr;fg aid (caul use, _ Codes ktc ed. 11 ia5".4 1„-- i....„ 4 . k r a \ P 1 \ r ,;[ t I - k_ i � Y it , r 0... w 8 ..,.1 ,M8 1 < - r ---‘0-1 ,,,) " 77.;" , r / t 8 z . -1 r k i St Qi r i In § r ., co i t -! CC• �� :: __ i-17 x •' I x 0. . r± p - r N m i.. w Q f h • t Map based On den 40144 the 1e4CerSott Cy. IDM5 server: Exhibri A-5 285 13 70 950300 subject property 113 185 3 Mips provided byJdtersen ConniyGIS,r, yy ._ lonia Legend ff Major Roads C sus 2000 5howti po ktttai dev s vcci tai ❑ Blocks DTracts Population Density D o ,M .o, . 14299 El 143.917.99 918 276199 ■ 2782 40303 ■ Oars APR 3 0 2003 `, Exhibi. g--1 This application is a request to rezone Gov Lot I of my property, legal description : S6 T28 R1E Gov. Lot I and Gov Lot II ( East 1/2 ), located on Swansonville Road from Commercial Forest 1:80 to Rural Forest 1:40. In so doing, this would allow my brother to build an appropriate sized home for his family of four . In 1989, I purchased this 68.74 acre parcel as a sanctuary for the many trees and the various species of native flora and fauna . It was not until 1999, that I realized my dream of a home amongst my trees In August of 2002, my brother Phillip came to visit me for a few days . He is in the Navy and was about to report to his new tour of duty in Japan . He has decided that he will retire after this tour, in 2007 . I offered to sell him some acreage where he could build a home for his family : Mary,his wife, and my nephews, Adam, 7 and Benjamin, 3 . Phil and Mary have been overseas for almost all of Adam and Ben's young lives, and I saw the chance to have them live so dose to me as an opportunity to teach my nephews about native flora and fauna, the joys of gardening and the importance of being good stewards of the land . This land especially, because someday this land will be theirs . Imagine my dismay when I called to check on the zoning for my property and discovered it was not zoned rural residential 1:20, as it was when I got my building permit, but had been rezoned to Commercial Forest 1:80, and my brother would not be allowed to build his home . After a somewhat frantic call to the Dept . of Community Development, I learned that by filing this amendment petition, it could be possible to change the zoning and that would allow for Phillip to build his home of 2000-2500 square feet. I am asking the Board of County Commissioners to grant my request . Thank You - - �� . i APR 3 0 2003 °I 4�!/f ./Jt!�(.� L- Exhibit B-2 From: commander Phillip K. Pall , u.s. Navy To: Jefferson county Board of Rezoning Subject: Rezoning Appeal 1. Please help make my family's dream come true. we have fallen in love with the beauty of this area and our dream is to buy some land from m sister, build a home and live here for the rest of our lives. But my sister found out that the current zoning does not allow me to build m home. Please make the necessary corrections to the zoning on parcel 821061001 so that I can be free to build my family's retirement home. 2. I have been serving as an officer in the military for over 20 years. My family and I have been stationed overseas mostly (japan and Italy) and have never had a good opportunity to settle down and own a home. my Mary, and my two sons, Adam and Ben, and I have a dream of settling down and becoming happy and productive members of the Port Ludlow community. I plan to enter the "troops to teachers" program and apply to be a teacher in the Chimacum School district. Additionally, my will also allow my elderly father to relocate and live with us. Three generations together under one roof and with my sister very close nearby. Other people may take this for granted but as a military serviceman always being uprooted and away from my family, it is something I have waited for my entire life. 3. Please see the wisdom in granting this request. we are not developers. we only ask for simple changes that make sense based on zoning in the parcels adjacent to our property. Please help make my family's dream come true and approve these requested changes. Than you very much. very respectfully, /s/ Phillip K. Pall _ _.. commander, united states Navy - APR 3 0 2003 Page 1 Exhgbif 8-3 The existing land use of Gov Lot I S6 T28 R 1E, is undeveloped forest land, with the exception of two covered shelters used as recreational/picnic sites . If this property is rezoned to Rural Forest 1:40, per our petition, a home of at least 2000 square feet would be built starting approximately in 2007 . Potential impact to environment, public facilities and services would be minimal . APR 3 0 2003 ' ff xxhi bi4- C-1 \---/—L-ee\i"15 ."-/ . v�0: ( ;E f/11)/: I T SHEL TER TER 6 J I IOU- SF AT$ l AN ' LE - ti \\LTI I\ , I 1 o ,. oa -��,,. I . 0 \x. 0 10 \ ' \ 1 7 4 ill ' ' ..t APR 3 0 2003 i' y', Exh i bid C -Z -•- •:,.,.(..e.49y . \,\ % ,.\\Al\\,--4,izIft•s..,,,\.- LOGGED OFF • COMMERCIAL FOREST c i IP : :7:0401, i),t' illeg7 Mo 1 M R E E l R S //ICI_ T A ELTER c L o VA M PALM► ISTING DIRT ROAD E {O,1 ti , cRi LTE A 1 L �' F R E S IN \\:%44:44\144 �. T SIVANSONVILLE ROAD \\1/4\s‘.‘ki:11.NSs\s\ COMMERCIAL FOREST 1 DRAINAGE TO ‘ \ h CHIMNCUM CREEK \\\ APR 302003 Map output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend .: ,, . - _. .... ,Al. Road System I': 1 Parcels-H SIPZ M Ross SIPZ �...._ .. ■ Hip R∎s%SIP2 Cmit!SIPZ 2000 Aerial Photos E l .•�t. .whr.n -..:tr=y �._�. ... ...�... .. _.-y.. ,,== "" ■FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Zoning information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made during the 1999 Comprehensive Plan amendment process.Zoning designations must be confirmed with the Department of Community Development. Acria,( oat)* off' Pow( I it ,i APR302003 '1 i http://maps.co jefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName—parcels ou... 4/24/2003 APR 30203 c-4 II d N 06s _ q� R ee .. Te e)) a 04 ?.. CO t+ O.s Aeh-ta I viek& sub 'ec4- proper I i APR 302003 EXHIBIT E - Explanation of Impacts of Rezone Proposal in Item 14 of Application 14(a)Gov Lot 2(E112)has become my single-family home residence built in 1999. 14(b) I believe the assumptions behind the Comp plan are still valid.The adjacent properties are unchanged with no development since 1989 when I purchased this property. I feel this is a factor weighing in favor of my proposal. 14(c) The Comp Plan states a vision of balanced new growth while preserving the rural nature and character of Jefferson County. I believe my proposal is supportive of this vision. 14(d) The subject property is not served by mass transit 14(e) This is a petition for rezone only. If in the future a house is built, it would have the imact of a typical single- family home. 14(f) As noted above, I believe that the proposal is consistent with the goals,policies, and stategies of the Comp Plan. 14(g) This is a petition for rezone only. I foresee no adverse impacts upon county transportation network, capital facilities, utilities,parks,or environment On the contrary,the tax base of a single-family home will be an addition to the county budget 14(h) See previous answer. 14(1) (i)Access will be unaffected by the proposal. (ii)The county provides no utilities to the property. (iii)The proposal is completely compatible with the adjacent parcels of the same size. 14(1) Most adjacent properties are owned by commercial timber companies. I see no desire for them to change their zoning. 14(k)Exhibit A-5 shows the density of population local to subject property.With the exception of my home,there has not been any increase in population in adjacent parcels. 14(1)This question is not applicable.Subject property is not located within an unincorporated UGA. 14(m)I feel my proposal is completely consistent with RCW 36.70A,the county-wide planning policy for Jefferson County,and all other applicable local,state,and federal laws �.g cow ,�o. JEFFERSON.COUNTY E 0 d •E '►� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN- 621 Sheridan Street•.Port Townsend• Washington ton 9 83� APR 1 0 'S'2Eirm `V" 360/379-4450 • 800/831.-2678 •360/379-4451 Fax JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Application for Formal Site-Specific - Comprehensive Plan/UDC.Amendment' MLA# 3 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: ANE Forests of Sound Applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community development by May 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during this year's amendment process. Completed applications that are received after May I will be placed on the'docket for the following calendar year. Applications that are incomplete (i.e., that do not include all of the information required below) will be returned to the applicant. Please note that formai site-specific amendment applications requesting expansion of existing commercial areas are subject to a November 22, 2000 Growth Management Hearings Board decision which prohibits the County from expanding existing commercial areas. The County is currently appealing this decision to Superior Court. in the event that this appeal is unsuccessful, applications requesting commercial area expansion may not be acted upon. Submittal Requirements A completed Master Land Use Application and SEPA Checklist (if applicable). Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 3. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee (as applicable), as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance,as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. $. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the following: a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred(500)feet of the site;and • c. The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of the site. G. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit B,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s), if applicable. Applidations for project-related formal site-specific redesignations must include plans, and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have • rpaximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. _. 1f Please prepare and label as `Exhibit"C,"a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within the general vicinity [I.e., within a three hundred (300)-foot radius). The exhibit must depict topography, wetlands and buffers, easements and their purpose, and means of access to the site. The intent of the exhibit is to clearly Illustrate the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. • 1 See UDC Section 9.4. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.10!82001 Page 1 • 8. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed.(Attach additional sheets,if necessary.) • To chan:e the zonin: from 1 dwellin: 'er 20 acres to 1 dwellin: er 10 acres, ECOS 0 fah , would be consistent with the zoning that already exists Nor th•along . the Beaver Valley road. Also the property is currently being•taxed at 28 time the value of forest.land, and is taxed as if it were developable. 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is: Rural real Aar i Al. 1 dwe].linz per 20 acres. 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is: Rural. residential, 1 dwelling per 10 acres 11. The current use of the site is:_ forestry 12. The proposed use of the site is: Rural residential 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required, please prepare and label as "Exhibit D," proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in"bill"format,with'text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts (e.g., strikeouts). 14. Please prepare and label as "Exhibit E," a thorough, explanation of how the-proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals,if any,meet,conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? • c. How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? d. Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? —. • e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation (e.g., sheriff, fire and emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental,services)? f. • Is the proposal consistent with the goals, policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? g. Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network,capital - facilities,utilities,parks,and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? h. Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? I. How is the subject parcel(s) physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development including,but not limited to the following: (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? j. Will the proposal,if adopted,create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties?If the answer is yes, how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole? • SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.10/9/2001 Page 2 ( � r M1 f k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? I. If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? m.. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County, and other applicable inter jurisdictional policies or agreements,and any other local, state or federal laws? 15. The applicant hereby certifies that the statements contained in this application.are true and provide an accurate representation of the proposed amendment;and the applicant(s)hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. *. . LD 04. //X/ 03 APPLI 1 S SIGNATUR ° ► i/3f eve/T4F1 DATE, 4t94•449 MC. 7.2V�2o 11. r PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE • PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures, representative authorization is required if application is not signed by the owner.] RL-g APR 1o2003 FFRSN COUNTY \ OELO4 ! ?.. TY0EVa2MENT P • • SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV 001 Page 3 .1" tr, EMS i s' t I'�) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME I 0 MN Di' �. '� 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 '4S'�Nd's0 360/379-4450 . 800/831-2678 •360/379-4451 Fax JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal _ or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: • i 2. Name of applicant ANE Forests of Puget Sound, Inc. . 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Jim Wick C/O Woodland Management Inc. 5285 SW Meadows Rd Suite 468 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 4. Date checklist prepared: 1/24/03 5. Agency requesting checklist Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable) Start July 2003 with surveying and road building. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 1 s ' 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. flatifet be the sale of one or two larger lots to the east. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No application pending 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Permits would be needed for the Building of 4 homes, including septic, driveways, and providing power to sites. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) We would be subdividing 40 acres into. 4 separate parcels. Orientation will be east and west crossing the, Beaver highway. The access road and building sites will be on the east side of the .highway, thus protecting wet::areas west of the road. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Property is located NE 1/4 SE 1/4 (Gov lot 1)• Sec 36 T29N R 1W on both sides of Beaver Valley Road. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): F- ,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. This site is flat on the west and star s getting steeper on the east side of the paved road. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 2 ' , r .M .+...-......M.�-. LLOYEE b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? APR 1 0 Steepest slope would be approximately 30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay, sand,g : - ,• µµ • COUNTY If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any �� r�iry DEVELOPMENT The west side is a peat area and to the east as the ground rises it becomes more sand and gravel. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There is no grading or filling except for the normal road building and excavation at the home sites. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so,generally describe. No, other sites developed on the same slopes north of the site are stable. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Less then 2% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: None • a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be minimal emissions during and after the construction and would mainly be limited.. to home..owner's automobiles. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed Measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water NONE a. Surface: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. There is a intermittent stream on the North edge of the property. The west edge of the property is wet as it approaches the east fork of the Chimicum creek. There would be no development done West of the Beaver Valley road. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 3 I 2 11 i i roject require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, pleasq describe and attach available plans. No,: except for the access road which will leave Beaver Valley road 7'5-feet South of .the intermittent stream. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. The water for the 4 home sites will need to be provided from deep wells. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example:domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Domestic Sewage will be needed for the 4 home sites. • c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. • Homes will be built on high ground away from the streams, so runoff will be of no signifacance. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: The road construction will include cross drainage onto forest soils and would not go into the streams.. Runoff from houses will be very minimal and would not be near the streams. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 4 4. Plants 2003 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: APR 1 0 X deciduous tree: alder, maple,aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir,cedar, pine,other JEFFERSON COUNTY X shrubs DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily,eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Removal of small trees and brush. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There would be the use of native_ plants except for the use of ornamental plants around the homes and the lawns. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site birds: aw "heron,eagleCsongbir �s othe r. mamma s: 1Za, bear,elk, beaver,other. fish: bass,sa mon,trout, hemng,shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: We would not have development near wet areas on the west side of the site. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity would need to be accessable to the building sites. SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 5 • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, to0,3 er erlylescribe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: None b. Noise . 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? There is already a considerable amount of traffic_,noise .from Beaver Valley . road, additional noise will be of no consequence. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic,construction,operation;other)?Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There would be the normal..home: construction noise from approxiametly lam to 5pm. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: None 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site ana adjacent properties? North of the site there are small rural home sites. West of the site there Ire home sites on marginal agricultural ground and east of the site in forestland. This site is currently being used as forestland. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No • • SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 6 c. Describe any structures on the site. 4 None APR 1 4 M3 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Rural Residential with 1 dwelling unit per 20 acres f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Rural Residential with 1 dwelling unit per 20 acres g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"or critical area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? .Plan is for 4 .families, to reside in the completed project.. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: There would be no, development west of Beaver.Valley road and a 200 foot set back from the property to the east. 9. Housing - a. Approximately how many units would De provided,if any? indicate whether high, middle,or low- income housing. There would be 4 middle income houses. - b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 7 • 10. Aesthetics Eat:What is ttietallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Height would be 35 feet with a wood exterior ' • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: None 11. tight and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting ;would be mostly evening lights above Beaver Valley Road. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None 12. Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There is fishing, hunting and boating the the area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. • • No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed pn,or proposed for, national,state,or local preservation., registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 8 i - %. <,..7----rr,:', r---14"-:,:,--.,:---i 114 u.,,,, Oi. if 16. Utilities 1.1 ,,, APR 1 Q • a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:electricity, natural gas,water, re se servlc FFERSON COUNTY telephone,sanitary sewer,septic system,other. DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Currently there is none at the site, but there is electricity, re use se' ' - - . telephone available along. Beaver Valley Road. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. There will be a need for electricity, well water, telephone and septic. c `r_ C. SIGNATURE • The above answers are true nd complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. n " L 4 1 Q a A'a-- S.9,4* 4 ©,mot . \"-r Signature: +tea v �^ Date Submitted: 3 - 2(,-e 3 SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 10 • Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. • Beaver Valley road serves this site, and the access road will be east of Beaver Valley road and 75 feet South of the small intermittent stream. is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not to our knowledge c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No e. Wits the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. We can only estimate 20 to 30 sparatic trips per day for all 4 sites. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. There would be increased public service for the 4 new homes. -- b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None • SEPA Environmental Checklist Page 9 SON co �, � JEFFERSON COUNTY - _ 5' LLt 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � `� 4., 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 '` � ��0 360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax APR 0 20 bil: www.cojefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Master Land Use Permit Application Form JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. 0�COMMtIN�TVD' OPMENT PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number: ® 0 0 ® ® © 0 © © W Subdivision Name: Lot Number Property Size: 40 (acres/square feet) Existing Use of Property: Forestry Site Address and/or Directions to Property: NESE (Gov Lot 1) Sec 36 T 29 N R 1 W APPLICANT&OWNER(INFORMATION Applicant(if applicable): ANE Forests of Puget. Sound >Inc. Telephone: 503-684-4004 Address: C/0 Woodland Management Inc. 5285 SW•Meadows. Rd. Suite 468 . City: Lake Oswego ate: OR Zip Code: 97035 Email AddressWoodland @Woodlandm: Applicant's Signature: ,.. 4 t--‘3;ZAA 016,-x s` 0,.,,,..-A- Property Owner(s)of Record: ANE Forests of Puget Soundr� ne 503-684-4004 . Address: same as above City: State: Zip Code: Email Address I acknowledge that the applicant above I yin r a building permit on my property. Owner's Signatur • �+ /iirill:P't / //YC• I hereby designate Jim W_. of Woodland Mgmt Ind act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). e'Vet2e7 JGrllr9 lC• (PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE) - (DATE) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as necessary) To subdivide site into. 4 building sites. [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements.An asterisk(*)indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. TNDe I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed*Yes'Use Consistency Analysis ' UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ . Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 . ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 • ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7. ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments . • UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 (OVER) N - Tvoe II Permits Refer to: - r .w *{ ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-k ., O Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat,Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 O Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 O ;Conditional(Administrative)"C(a�"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 • ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d) Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) O Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ . Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) ❑ . 'Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 O Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.2 SEPA 8.10.12(b) Type Ill Permits ❑ Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 O Long Plat,Preliminary* .. UDC Section 7.4 O Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) O Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C O Shoreline Management Substantial Development,Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 O Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 O Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 O Appeal UDC Section 8:4.3 SEPA 8.10.12(c) Type IV Permits • O Long Plat,Final UDC Section 7.4 O PRRD,Final UDC Section 3.6.13 Tvae V Permits ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 O Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment" UDC Section 5 • O Appeal of SEPA .UDC Section 8.10.12(d) Other Local.State of federal Permits, ❑ Please identifyy any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED] By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. mate gfalsehood or any omission application materiallffact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this applicationpacket ctmay result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit.. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. 1. PROPERTY OWNER. (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the"Endangered Species Act" or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Z. (DATE) PROPERTY OWNER EYy+ibtr :4- IAO YfJa p4. /Y t1 sx ix , trJr tt r3 b l r a�a�'1y PA� ', :1;': c t t e'Y r.� y. '1 '. 1,..';' -:',.'''.4',.'4', '''''' ,rue"1`C�yJ2;K-,r '4'.∎,.` 1.p.4.1.2; • t > r I S 1 ,.6fiR+ 1Jri>;'y"3 !si�Ji4.,.,-' ,— '4F;.,., - •;� 1a rtp uG ., E'•{ t1.,'`'.,‘,.;'!...,-,v_.:,.:',, a q, r' .1•.nR►:Irt i 1'°'- 41,,'1. 7 ...ti ti) 1 174+'a;{n J{ij� i W y.7�tiE•�'F, i{F3 "� eta 1�,xrfO ► at t 7.4'.��i in. •t• . 7Hi�amr�•E>9�, _t" >D •�.+ ,�� ,s: :r w ,� ? n+ ;,.,.,,,:_.z, Jt .rF lter i '! 11:::-1_,,,,,::,. # .•Fa. stS < s" � • OA. J }“",i 1;• ' • ,•�. �. yi:�t. l`, t7,1f.t i4./TiiYif ...1 i. t �n< ; s..t �+5 :',r t''' ,.:(' :1;'•t'' 1;irv1t'+.fi � •'J.F t Y, L °,1� i11tti/ftd4.WANN t r y r 1 .cfY :ri rtyti)7•k�iTljg�grii}i�� tix' 4 a KarTt 'txis Ji ,, x f r iY ,,a )y ` ti fi t 2 ' I x�; ', aX{h y4 ali4fro t t'.. � fx 1 i } ii a t0 , tt±;12.? r ',�atrJ fg.2 if _, '.tA ,„� x , ; #rt�'.4; t e l , t - , ,.. we� L�A/�;{` t ,14 T! , ,H,X4r r o-^' a t .y`k a M '-,n t t,•„,,,,,, �,..gtsr .i �. ,. 1, � 7'Lyy, S? r r / J . .... t.. / ��1i ifetior �1x Y -, t,-,,,,,,;;.1.,-1-;,'.., 1 11...,, , ' 1 6 �#M d F °� i..t.''. , e > 1 g a 2 Ga i X P t P i I-re-Air�y}11: r t4yl, r ,,?O .! :t: (' u .,4 r - Z � , ! i g ,,,, $ S�nL. f-, i y^ t . �.,,iYiT l''''1,', a s 1 ;1 �� r' ,i , • fiy .� o . Jt1� 1,r t :, r ye .J.0 � �'� 1 rt ,trT�T;,ptI }� � g�`„���F l,yf 1„=.f �'T 11 .5,,,.„,,,,,,..; Sr tY g'}:1 .(;: tt.,} �, t r v, ritor k1."„f'k I.r :I tae ? Nfi! ,� V. ,, � �� i t ':iP ,� .” a jiF ' F 3 , ,,,,, .,,,,, .Y y }.F 1}L t:fjD s e ! : p ir#!t r t y.c FYd 1 4Fif a JL` ti � � C , r 4 t y t : r4 ) l T�f ' ��1��K T lt1 .t ' p T�;t . . r4 ', ! ;t "M lb i f1 l'''14t-,:i ' : ,;',1p,,. .-,,,,,„,., 11.40.,,,-1;: , , :-. -: 4Jti.k i"'3i • '1�' r��il sn J ▪ '▪ ,./' 1 n�.Li/r { �t 1111! °!.2t ti JC y'r ,.. t r+ y 10; .te lyt.• .221 t ,+.I•L . r:,:;., ;:',,,k2 t 7* t ,`r i i!4 r 1 ail tL.I+ld 3t�'. j‘ y ,yM'M § ,gyp a• 4;"'• WININIC ff�� f 1• S4at lJs PCpp9S2r L.01' SI e C �J 4STns�r/ fly t—",-.1 r` .- vjY., y 4l•= ? t k.,scat 41= r; 411,1• • fL�ArtF, •Ad'sol ,, , 1 C,, ,( ' 7 F'$0*�.t4 Y♦ -' ' J � .r- f < t 44 06, r . w kls � z 1 S :4x.k� �' t J�Yi ty t3�lwr'.(.!lc,( i', ,• , M'4 ��.• +.. i =,i 1 Ij • '',•' 1 if �Ny `'? t .t,-w›. i *� •F phi l l 1 -•�a�'`y �k''o��'l�� a�a�v�.:�•�� 5�� i �,� f �7L:1St� ��0 �T z ,, ., I w t,,�' �lE#�t � t 0,,i''':', T j"' ikaS.r iS1' 4 W!'xji;T �� 1, t Y" fit{fi'It -"14441rt i• ti k. �t f, Cfi1 a4$ Este . ' pI ,.i,'' r rYyie,rrr**6.X74414)., 1 t> ,.4ki.''' "'' .'t,K.• M1 .w �.• ... , 1. , .c,t .t. ..{•.,, n. y`l�2 ..•... ' f. fix. "Exhibit B" It is our intent to change from 1 dwelling per 20 acres to 1 dwelling per 10 acres. Our site is located on both sides of Beaver Valley Road(NE 1/4 SE 1/4 (Gov lot 1) Sec 36 T 29 N R 1 W). In reviewing this area, dividing into 4 parcels of 10 acres would be consistent with adjacent properties as the adjacent properties to the North, on the East side of the road are currently zoned Rural Residential 1 dwelling per 10 acres. This would also be consistent with the zones 3/4 miles South of the property East of the Beaver Valley road. In completing this project we would be asking to add 2 extra homes sites to the 2 that are already allowed. In doing this there would be minimal if any real impact on Beaver valley road. We would be placing our access road east of Beaver Valley road and 75 feet from a small intermittent stream. The building of these roads would include cross drainage onto forest soils with no chance of drainage into the streams. The traffic to Beaver Valley road by this access road would be slight if even noticeable. The building sites would be placed on high ground with the need to remove only a minimal amount of small trees and underbrush, still leaving the houses fairly isolated from the road and the valley intact. There fore not having much of an impact if any on people passing by. Currently the property has had a few deer and a occasional hawk, but mostly we have songbirds. By locating the houses on the East side of the site and leaving the west side of the valley intact we feel that we would not be disturbing their habitat. Our plan is to leave most of the natural vegetation and would expect to have a few ornamental plants close to the home site surrounding a lawn area. Electrical utilities are currently along Beaver Valley road but not connected to the site. Connecting these to the site would be of minimal impact especially since they are already at the entrance to our site. The remaining utilities would be septic and well water which should have no impact to the surrounding areas. There would be a need to increase public service either way we look at this,but by adding 2 extra sites it would not put a strain or a heavy burden on any of the public services. If anything it could bring extra revenue to the community. Our goal is to have 4 quality building sites that will enhance the area and allow 4 families the ability to grow in a positive rural environment. In doing so there is a benefit to the county and the community in that the lower valley would be intact and at the same time increase the value on the land and bring income to the community. tAEC E 1E 1] APR 10 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT eo,, ' T L r ' FOREST PRACTICE BASE YAP . , • T O W N S H I P 2 '9 NORTH , R A N G E 0 1 W E S T ( W : M . ) , S-E:•C•T-tl1•.O.�DI._....,3_�, ,� •_��y��ry^ APPLICATION i . tjj C" E t1 (1II R ' �� w / I ,. qf' rte 'C J�JTY 11 m. . ..... _iii ie, / . 1 1 I / 531585 531586 4 111 . • • len ) • 1 I lea . ..: • L I 1- ,`I allorwApr , i ,z1.. . ill , Witt 530 4 530426 1111111115,41. . c • I `M NIAAN viikrik. N4‘111 • • . L. pliiii, . . f • .ear 41 Ilh1\1lFsAllkllIllMlla 'a \ i - • 1 1 52'265 529266 • 529267 SCALE D 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 FEET 1 Mle (moo K) . II. MAP DATE: November 15, 2000 • . CONTOUR INTERVAL : 40 Feet LEGEND: See Instructions NAD 27 DISCLAIMER: See Legend Wa tr/WBts nMa pi.ncAd h ir a re l orapon nd e c f vmaY fbe atc d c rdetloy ed f or ln os tsan,wetlands, and possible water courses. • rn .a --= . O IND • T cl o T �v CI ao ---s IRT . c, . vv 1 Q o OR . -o . II • i 111A111151gg ° gig is. if . Q ViflU — Po to i Pi Q$1 S2 m a D O Z b 1 i N >" ia > ` � 8 ;' � r{+ iii l $ $ o 2:<2 3 i c �v N N. 14 17 1 (SW 1/4 38-29N-1W) • -4_ o I g • P 1R $i5Y /92.93 ;$ !ila CO C0 N* i I O I k: �IA t,a ____ � m il!W c co 383.93 g 8 R 1111//// A ri P P m 1 gl rn / PA D 4 v toil lv _ w �.' 3.hd=0 �v 2 73 1 . . � . . �f 478.28 � m 847.81 . 1 i.— A m r 1 t. r 1 '..11741113 r I . °° rnfA�' S. °oo o r r -ri CD i 4 — Z 1�1 Ir m o , a gi r �t �j _+rt i Z: AwAI, II • �y1 ! / OR j'` / A T W 11/ ,� (SW 1/4 31-29N-IE) ,—;.0 CO Cri O 0 �O N W N i{ 1 I' D ru N —1 kvz2 01 "Exhibit E" A) Major circumstances have not changed in relation to the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive plan. B) We think that the comprehensive plan is still valid and that this change can fit into the existing plan. C) The proposed amendment would enhance the visual appeal without deflecting from the rural aspect. It would bring an increase in property value and add income to the community. Also bringing this area into the same zoning as those properties to the north. D) If your talking public transportation,there is none alone Beaver Valley Road,and so that would not be an issue. E) This proposal would not have a major effect on the level of service for public facilities,if anything I think it would bring a increase in revenue to these services, giving them an opportunity to advance. F) Yes. We would be providing affordable living,bringing economic growth with out putting a strain on any public facilities or services. At the same time leaving wildlife habitat and still allowing the property to be productive. G) No. Adding two home sites would have a nominal impact if any impact at all. H) No. Again the impact would be nominal if any impact at all. I) By changing this property it would bring it consistent with surrounding properties and easily accessible by Beaver Valley Road. Utilities currently run along Beaver Valley Road,making connection to those utilities not an issue. J) This proposal if adopted would not add pressure to change other properties. We would become the same as the surrounding properties around us that are already listed with 1 home site per 10 acres. Which is what we are proposing. K) No,this is a very small change and does not materially change land use or growth projection. L) Adding 2 more dwellings to this site would not put a major if any impact on the availability of facilities or the services in the immediate area nt, \II APR 1 0 2003 AFFERSON OO IY DEPT. DEVELOPMENT M) Yes. We would be consistent with adjacent properties and since there would be no development west of Beaver Valley Road and a 200 foot set back from the property to the east that would leave most of the natural landscape, and still be leaving the land compatible for the wildlife in the area. VECEOVE APR 1 02003 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • mt o3-- IZ. ii. ` eJEFFERSON COUNTY T OQ V DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 i= It 360/379-4450.800/831-2678.360/379-4451 Fax I: t : • ---- -._.- i www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment I; 1;. # ii a A - ! i i Master Land Use Permit Application Form }t 8 � ,: -1, ' PROPERTY INFORMATION I I Tax Parcel Number: ® 'r:. ç ;y r:a i_GP. :r ' :.,: j Subdivision Name: Lot Number. 1 Property Size: So� square feet) Existing Use of Property: 1L 0 '4 ,'r /;' ' Site Address and/or Directions to Property: r �- 1.041.r r vc /' / 1 ,' ' Arne • / / A.' ', ' , v.' 'n APPLICANT&OWNER INFORMATION Applicant(if applicable): , Q /;, 61 —Li' i li , 1 1///A Telephone/430:'f y O Address: .7r. VA 3 City: lI. 77 :P ,� //� St- -: WA Zip Code: Email Address adnithitide Applicant's Signature: hills�/' 0 T Property Owner(s)of Record: O/i i t I G 1W Ji,"'T e•honer l :l/ -0 g'2.. Address: STt'YI/k t//V f / 4 #r ,m =rau City: State: Zip Code: Email Address I acknowledge that the appli -nt above is a•plyin. for a building permit on my property. Owner's Signature: _., //./ :. - _ ,..i n / JO I hereby designa e V/1/ L)/ to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). _WAIL _.. 3 - 3A-0 • (PROPERTY et R IGNATUR-) / (DATE) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as nece sary) J� I / / �) u •f7 ,/ ail'/'T i_ /, -t .41 ie i/ = / /f �l ' ATI ' ; _F � .�F,S ;i . i • anty i� , orb , 1w IGWoW6 s-tan ' Ay rs'4 , / ''t point a if API/ cehw. . [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements.An asterisk(*)indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. Type I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access' UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 1\ ❑ Tem.ora Use based on use ma be T •e II or T se Ill * UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 (OVER MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.02252002 , • Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1 ❑ Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat, Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 O Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) ❑ Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 O Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) O Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence O Appeal UDC Section 8.4.2 SEPA 8.10.12(b) Type III Permits ❑ Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat, Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4. ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) ❑ Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑. Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development,Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 O Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.3 SEPA 8.10.12(c) Type IV Permits ❑ Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 ❑ PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.1§.. Type V Permits ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3:3.5 APR — 8 * Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 i _,_, ...... _..._._ . I ❑ Appeal of SEPA UDC Section 8.10.1 (d) Other Local,State or Federal Permits ❑ Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED] By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property.Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.Access and right of entry to the applicant's ro y I be r sted and shall occur only during regular business hours. )O� 1.(PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened_ or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the"Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Ap an h s r this di aimer and signs and dates it below. 2 (PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DAT ) MASTER LAND USE PERMIT DOC REV 0225/2002 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,"and "property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable:Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Rezone Request 2. Name of applicant:Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding(NWSWB) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:251 Otto Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Contact:Bill Brock Phone:(360)385-4948 4. Date checklist prepared:3-21-2003 5. Agency requesting checklist:Jefferson County Department of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable):Agency will complete determination within the year. The NWSWB will begin initial construction on the currently zoned commercial section of the property as early as the end of this year, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain.Yes,the total build-out on this property will be several years from now.The final campus plan cannot be finalized until this proposal is resolved.A five-acre campus will have a totally different look than a two-acre campus. In the five-acre campus,a public parking lot for boat trailers will be included.This public facility would help reduce future traffic congestion in this waterfront area. The five-acre campus also allows for a more attractive campus layout and room for any future expansions.Immediate plans(within the next year)are to construct one hard building and erect two material covered shelters on the current commercial section of the property. This would allow the NWSWB to move from its current location to this interim campus. APR - 8 2003 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. A Draft Environmental Impact statement was finalized March 17,2001 for this subject property and the NWSWBs waterfront properties by Western Washington University,Huxley College of Environmental Studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No approvals are pending concerning the subject property. The NWSWB just completed a Pre-Application Conference with the Jefferson County Department of Community Development for initial construction of buildings on the commercially zoned section of this property as well as future plans for the waterfront properties.The NWSWB plans to continue activity related to that Pre-Application. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. For this amendment proposal no other approvals are required. 11. Give brief; complete description of your,proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)The NWSWBs proposal to have the entire five-acre property zoned commercial lies in the desire for enough space to ultimately build the campus as shown in Exhibit B.This Maximum Campus Plan includes some 12 buildings totaling around 38,000 sq. ft. These buildings will allow space for wood and metal shops,lumber and boat storage, administration, lunchroom, multiple classrooms, Library and even a student hostel. This Maximum Campus Plan is sized for a total of approximately 88 people during the nine month Associate Degree program.This Maximum Campus Plan also includes a.7 acre public parking lot for boat trailers that use the Port of Port Townsend boat launch. A Public Access Trail will be included in either the five-acre or two acre campus that will connect the center of Port Hadlock with the waterfront. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See Exhibit A, the subject property is located in section 1,T29N,R1W B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other .Flat terraces separated with steep slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?Slopes are 2H:1V to 13/411:1V;30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify than and note any prime farmland. Silty fine to coarse sand with gravel to sandy fine to coarse sand with cobbles to 3 inches.Soils are over consolidated and dense. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.The site has been previously graded by excavation as a borrow pit that has created three fairly level pads.There are no visible signs of land sliding or major soil movements. _ . _. APR - 82003 2 e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.No filling is anticipated at this time.There is the planned removal of some 4,000 cubic yards of gravel to widen the second terrace(within the current commercial zoned area). f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe.Some surficial raveling over time may occur.No significant erosion from runoff expected due to the porous nature of the site. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)?28-30%+ h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any:Any measures required through the permitting process will be employed. A storm water plan will be developed for future property a. Mr a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.During construction some dust and equipment emissions will occur,but not of any lasting significance.The use of boat construction materials such as turpentine,paints,epoxy,varnish,linseed oil,etc,will be properly stored and used as t hey currently are at the NWSWB. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.Not to our knowledge c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any:Any wood dusts created during boat construction would be contained to the boat shops.Any boat finishing emissions are minor compared to the area in question. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into.A lagoon that empties into Port Townsend Bay is to the east. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans.Part of the lowest terrace on the property comes within 200 feet,but verbal discussions with the Washington State DOE and Fish and Wildlife indicate little concern over our plans. 3 Estimate the amount of fill and dredge edgematerialthat would be placed in or removed _. ,-., from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.Not applicable. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general APR - $ 3 description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan.No 3 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.Not over and above normal rainwater discharges. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No in both cases. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve.Discharges into the ground will be domestic sewage only. Closed metal collection containers are used routinely to collect brush cleaning solvents and other excess fluids.These containers are disposed of at a hazardous collection facility.A sewage system (drain field and treatment tanks)has already been permitted with the Jefferson County Health Department.For this site the construction of initial holding tanks and connection lines is all that is needed. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe.The Maximum Campus Plan would contain two holding basins for surface runoff(Exhibit B).This is in a conceptual stage and will require a finalized storm water plan before permitting. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe.It is possible that accidental spills of solvents could occur,but the amount used at any one time is usually small. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any Holding basins will probably be used to contain surface runoff impacts. 4. Plants a. check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: A -.---.._ _......_ deciduous tree: , apl aspen,other(madrona,willow) — evergreen tree f)* Mae,other ' , shrubs • • -�grass APR - 8 2003 pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?Vegetation in the gravel pit consists of a considerable number of non-native species,many of which are invasive weeds. 4 APO - 82003 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.None known d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any:There is no landscaping plan at this time,as the final campus layout is in question. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds:ds ►, _ P other: mamm bear,e i. beaver,other: fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. In the vicinity; bald eagle, marbled marrelet c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.Migrating birds and bats in the proximate area d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any This property will be vegetated with a mix of thickets and open areas.Native vegetation will be left intact and provide habitat for birds,insects, reptiles,and small mammals.Non-native vegetation will be removed. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc.Final plans have not been developed but it is anticipated that the heating source for those buildings that require heat(current boat construction shops are not heated)will be electric, propane or fuel oil. Electricity will be run to all buildings for lighting and power tools. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe.No,this property is a minimum of 30 feet below most of adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any:Do not know at this time. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe.The following is wording taken from the mentioned Draft Environmental Impact Statement..."The processes that will be conducted at the site are minimal in regards to environmental hazards.It does not qualify as an industrial facility according to the Code of Federal Regulations.There will exist a chance of spills during storage and use of paints and varnishes but likely hood is minimal. Particulate and nuisance dust from saw dust waste exists.There will be some exposure to fiberglass and an epoxy resin but its use is required in an estimated 1 in 6 boats.There should be extreme caution in the u se of Oxalic acid,which is used for wood bleaching operations. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services over that currently available is anticipated,however,final permitting will allow for comment by emergency services. 5 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any:Flammable material storage lockers and on-site Material Safety Data Sheets; proper registration of all HAZMAT. Saw cut waste is recycled by students as firewood,project pieces,and the dust is used in garden paths and for animal bedding. Excess saw dust is sent to the County composting facility. Old paints, varnish,etc are taken to the local HAZMAT facility. . ' b. Noise `;1 APR - 8 2003 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)?Nothing to affect this project r c - 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site.Noise created by this project will be from traffic for the transportation of materials,removal of waste materials,and grading.There will be normal construction noises related to the new building.Normal noise activity related to school operations will come from electrical equipment used in the making of wooden boats and regular traffic from students and staff`.The hours of normal school operation are from 8:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any:No extraordinary measures are planned at this time,as the final campus plan is unknown.Electrical power tools will be housed within hard buildings in the final campus build out. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?The site is currently an abandoned gravel pit.The only building on the property is a rental mobile home on the uppermost terrace(see Exhibit C). Adjacent property uses include residential on the northwest and west,the Ajax Café on the northeast,a county road on the east,and the Kivley Center commercial development on the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe.Not to our knowledge c. Describe any structures on the site.A rental mobile home exists on the upper most terrace on the northwest part of this property(see Exhibit C). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what?Not initially,it is anticipated that the mobile home will be removed when and if the NWSWB builds a student hostel. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?The site currently is split between a Rural Village Center-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5. £ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?Split RVC and Rural Residential 1:5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?In the Maximum Campus Plan there would be 88 people working at the site.The student hostel can house a maximum of 24 individuals during our summer workshops and will have its own septic system.It is possible that the 6 hostel would be used during our nine-month program,but would likely house considerably less individuals than for shorter summer courses. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?One to two k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:None anticipated at this time. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any:A vocational school use is conditionally allowed under UDC Table 3-1 in a Rural Village Center.The conditional permitting process will allow for public comment. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,oc low income housing.The student hostel would house a ma>Jimam of 24 individuals during our summer workshops.The nine-month program would house considerably less. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing.One mobile home c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any:Space limitations will limit the area available for housing. The first priority for space will be construction of those buildings necessary for general operations of the NWSWB. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed?The tallest building planned at this conceptual stage is 34 feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?This property lies in a combination natural/man-made hollow that is at lest 30 feet below the Port Hadlock street level It is anticipated that no obstruction of views will occur. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:The proposed public access trail and its accompanying view areas will increase opportunities for the public to enjoy the existing views. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?There will be some security lights on around the campus during the night,final plan unknown at this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?Very unlikely that the project will create a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:None anticipated at this time. 12. Recreation 7 APR - 82003 a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?There are water- oriented activities available just down the road from this property.The Port of Port Townsend has a public boat launching ramp and a public dock.The NWSWB will be adding opportunities for the general public with its waterfront property plans.The property in question will add facilities for adult public education and public meetings. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe.No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any This propCrty will provide a public access foot trail from Port Hadlock down to Lower Hadlock Road.The applicant will provide additional public access to a dock(for viewing and picnics),down a proposed gangway to a floating dock and a public mooring field.These facilities will provide more opportunities for water-oriented activities. 13. Historic and cultural preservation r a. Are there any places cc objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state,or local preset-- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe.The Ajax Café,on an adjacent property,is listed on the national register under its original name"Gaister House". b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or 7:11 cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.Down the hill from this site and on the beach is a site referred to as"Tsetsi bus".This was a gathering area for tribes to get together for potlatches. Chemakaass lived in this vicinity before but became virtually extinct. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any Contact has already been made with the Washnrgten_..�. State Office of Archaeology&Historic Preservation concerning the overall plan.The NWSWB sent a letter to the Tsetsibus Heritage Council seeking their involvement,but there has been no reply to date. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site (see Exhibit Aa) will be from Lower Hadlock Road(County)and then up to where it connects with State Route 116(Oak Bay Road/Ness Corner Road). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?The site is not currently being served by Jefferson County Transit.The nearest transit stop is approximately 3/s mile from the site at the intersection of Chimacum Road and Ness Corner Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?There are 48 parking spaces in the main parking area and an additional 11 shown for the student hostel area.The five-acre build out also contains public boat trailer parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private).Initial verbal discussions with Washington State DOT involving the Maximum Campus Plan (approx.88 people),indicated that no traffic study would be necessary at the intersection of lower Hadlock Road and Oak Bay Road.The current traffic load on Oak Bay Road would require our proposal to be adding close to 200 left turns onto Lower Hadlock Road at peak time to trigger a traffic study.Verbal discussions with Jefferson County Public Works have been centered on our first phase of 8 development in which we will have from 50-60 students and staff at the site.Under those circumstances, no traffic studies would be necessary and no significant improvements to the road will be necessary. Also included in these assumptions is the continued presence of a Public Access Trail from Port Hadlock to the waterfront to mitigate lunchtime vehicular trips and to provide a safer pedestrian walkway. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe.No £ How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur.With a Maximum Campus Plan of 88 persons and using a wart csac scenario(all drive,one person per vehicle,students in hostel drive to campus,all drive to lunch and back)generates total vehicular trips in a day of 352. Based on recent student levels and staffing,when the NWSWB actually moves to this proposed site the real impact will be more like 50-60 people with a worst case scenario of 240 total vehicular trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The public access trail will help mitigate total vehicular trips to the campus area and provide pedestrian access for the general public from Port Hadlock to the waterfront 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe.The NWSWB move to this site would transfer the responsibility from one part of Jefferson County to another.No new need or service is expected. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.Nothing suggested at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available . •I site: ;111.1,1M) atural ice 1-ihon sanitary sewer 6V2=1,, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new or additional utilities over that which can be hooked up or started with existing vendors will be required. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: arbi/e4ffek Date Submitted: vg ea . _ APR - 8 2003 9 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street-Port Townsend-Washington 98368 360/379-4450-800/831-2678-360/379-4451 Fax Application for Formal Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment' MLA# PRO]ECT/APPU CANT NAME:Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Rezone Request Applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community development by May 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during this year's amendment process. Please note that, beginning in 2004, the application submittal deadline will be February I of each calendar year. Completed applications that are received after May I will be placed on the docket for the following calendar year.Applications that are incomplete(i.e., that do not include all of the information required below)will be returned to the applicant Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application and SEPA Checklist(if applicable).Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2. A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 3. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee(as applicable),as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance,as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the following: a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred(500)feet of the site;and c. The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of the site. 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit B,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s),if applicable.Applications for project-related formal site-specific redesignations must include plans,and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 7. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit"C,"a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within the general vicinity[i.e.,within a three hundred(300)-foot radius].The exhibit must depict topography,wetlands and buffers, easements and their purpose,and means of access to the site.The intent of the exhibit is to clearly illustrate the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. 8. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed.(Attach additional sheets,if necessary.) The NWSWB seeks to have the entire subject property zoned Rural Village Center-Commercial.Currently the property has a split zoning of RVC-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5.The split zoning seriously limits the NWSWB in its plans for developing a new campus on this property.The UDC allows conditional development of an adult/technical school(private)on Rural Village Center-Commercial but not on Rural Residential 1:5. See UDC Section 9.4. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.22512003 Page 1 ' APR - 8 2003 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is:Split zoning,Rural Village Center-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is:Total property would be Rural Village Center-Commercial 11. The current use of the site is:Abandoned gravel pit 12. The proposed use of the site is:Future site of the Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuildings main campus 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required,please prepare and label as"Exhibit D,"proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in"bill"format,with text to be added indicated with underlining(e.g.,underlinging and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts(e.g., Not applicable 14. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit E,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals,if any,meet,conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a.Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b.Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid,or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? c.How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? d.Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? e.Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation(e.g.,sheriff,fire and emergency medical services,parks,fire flow,and general governmental services)? f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals,policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? 9.Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network,capital facilities,utilities,parks,and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? h.Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? i. How is the subject parcel(s)physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development including,but not limited to the following: (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? j.Will the proposal,if adopted,create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties?If the answer is yes,how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole? k.Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? I.If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area(UGA),would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.2/25/2003 Page 2 • APR - 82003 m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW),the Ide ip na Qo y Jefferson C.and other applicable inter-Jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other local,state or federal laws? 15. The applicant hereby males that the statements conkdned in this application ant true and provide an accurate representation ofthe proposed amendment and the app (s)hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application maybe ntvoked f any such statement is found to be flats. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE bfL 3/31/0 3 PROPERLY OWNERS SIGNATURE 10 �, !, , DATE 3 31 0 3 PROPERTY OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE 3 3 I... 63 PROPERTY OWNER S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures,representative authorization is required if application is ndt signed by the owner.] ERE SPECIFIC APP.000 REV.2121103 Page 3 `,' 1 APR - 82003 — Exhibi�' � a i En a jxC o pz p < [ •Lb PZtt-p yyE0� .7 r P 'I 4 p 0„" K� g62 ' FCC p t a 11. 0 1 C 0. 14p UO S 00,K E it a¢ Amuw utk 0- 00i K t%! c Op aKc=Yp m ju 10- i`r��0.ppw .Xa h u 1-0-0 p tIm<1 3 L. 0 t- t< t ms�{C.pX ocuagti 1<-.n.�tI�KxXY O 4..p r� SOY lh ooz.KE,T.m.E i..;,=uJJJiOoy(`�a<WgOSNS omg vSO. p7pz"4<m K`Es<.1. y7 p Qy,wR<Ya 3?mrx`w NO(QC 0a1a° 70.06<Qega. mth<p01� q In, OuSa l O KQ pKM iYYYY-c<O F'pr� 7 1.u ��[p a07kW ilan p iTzEdo- m{,l V 2" ZC{.q C�OIY�/p�rS-<- �IOXUUVSI� 1•1d0'IKt1JCj( Y<OpV ICC O^O < o s j., oPCZC C] 02 0.S 9Ec v----- s FCC Nll� "'t0/E+jl."4 l<j(r<-..�Z((....I1.-...�jXCpEp�[Y.Ipp��,T,E�pp�.' .10/ 14 ..1W0 7 I''LOiOZ'''O<i]O 01a vgg4 .;O0.W<2?,E.Op00FS..ISO OOKKO^< Wm<k•„t:10 W,<�5 O.x7 W<000< w >C0.030S0 zm..i.m XSS<0. mar it.XU..7mt-uzic uuun.0.E�m-. I..aS oOX Smatn*. ROXu. w O-Nn+aot- mo-an. oen000- -No ..no noon—N n'In0 .-a —Nn r00 n0 O NNNNN NNNNNnn onr.onocanrr•1v ♦1V v...n.Cn non.) I . 1 ' 1�` V . , -+1, ' �' � Sv E ••I. a:. �, ` lov� -E 2.9:4171 III l.`f• A&N.44 \ 1-` . p•Pp. , . , , ,,, -..,%.% ..y.,1,10,47,. „ - ,,,,, .„ . . W Mfr:.. I4 .7 , IkW . 30 Z. warrows sAll,10 iek$ to, r-4 k ‘•CsO°t's i_...01p 0 I 1 0 tW, $e e 1 I I 4.70 4#4.,1.1 A �o eeee�a eee. . . a 4166 al"A:An W e eG� .� �� e 3 12 i„ r..] 0 <40 ..„ OPOP°Pltw- ...,40 ..,,,s,„w *re& 1 se 0 72 .goy �, a .,, II f1 cc s °r4� _ �` f (:TM JMOSVIa O . r1'F S y,, x 1114 (;)%Sol E tni '/ i 111 I '4p 11 1 i. NIE MI tha) � s -a 01761 Z------A71, , ' ” -7-1-, I 0-..*' COL 1 i pirri . ‘i . ilk: . .01\9., mal i 1 111 = / FE �:UM •' f ([pzo.UG - [ ¢ Iv a. ' Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 3-36 APR — 8 2003 nu ust z8, 1998 __. O Exh ihiii. A b 6.-) ._.. ..... . ,...4 . .., ., en a., --Z * '■1 i .t. 4. kr -1,- ce.... 4- et fit) ..1 ..._ 41E---, -.., .,,, ...._ _---. , .43.. ..... .." . -....... '-'-:1.1. . ----- • 1 tr ..... S. ..e- .,,e' -,.,- s,..-,- •z*,.,' --s. .1 E - --' --- - 4 It A',..•.:::'&'‘ . fiN-.:--.-'1:::,, . . -- - . 1 10% . t:,.: ;-,1 :) .'`.,''' '."*.;','"•"'",---- ,^---..- , ,.■• ' 00 •• '' t.... ,• A• .144' ..; -''':,--';‘''' .-—"---. -, ',-' ',... '',:',. _„,--....--ff-,„:,..! Ct. -. 1 ..... : .1, cl, -,,, 405~ *- . t.j,_ ., „-,.,t,i3., --.'";. ,,-::::-.:. ,•:,-.',,,,,,,,,Tz_.-=p,, :9' 0\ 1. - .-,. ` ••••• 1: ''. : _...- : ' : ..,:::.• ' -‘,/ -4,f.- 7. . ,,,e. I,' • "'" .'."4..n Z ..* in oo oo ---.1"' § s .:. ..,'4;-.-. . — ' ...-"----; , %-, 7 — ID ■o •4. . ^1. ......4c, 04 S.L1 42C , ZS .7.1 ■"..., . - • e fkt.34)9,LCVCk.-51' . k • 8 ,..s •,. / • ,. . no .7 .7; §T . - -'v ......c " %,, g „...- ,....... 11„ 4_ --.- .1 .- ..- A3(AN `i=. A ZS -- - .14.26. M-VE •., "„,. ,'-.:, . ... 4 . ,t ''.. tn 1.) .••••* ' . 'a i f 1 i 4..4 , ._ •- . It ' 4_sco-C.C.01,7" `,\7',......„,....>".....^. - .. ......... - ;...1 i 1 , ., g 01 9 : g f :. di,A. .. 45 Iti /• a • Fs .7.., ta. 7....::' a ' 4.4,g. i . - , - 6 c,..'- --r: '`.t.:: t , , ; .' i , 0 ,.§. . ',1.,....,,,.. /.:,,„ 4. . ..„,-:, (,74'...... t ''-'-''',. - :`,. --;:, -: tfv, '''.-, ...., . _ . z ...- -,':'' -,:•,,',.. -- *- — - • -8 ...:" -,/ , '' -2 .4 ' 4 / .c) - O 4 -• , ., - 8 --- — ze g -; '8g2,--. 8 .: _ ,:•<-7,,,,8 .n,..: - g , •• -8 * —§ --' c, ,•.-..i-...:..1 i CV 1;I..;2' (71-■ '— . -.— * \ -; '7. • i iii•-. 8 - g ' T.„' :77—-,,,•- " " .; P---,0;I.- a, 8 /-* 1. 1ig .- I..,-:.."..i t •r. :-•' . •'' i ••'t ' '- q e-g i - 0..• <.C. l 0 1 ... 2: - cc ,u:• -,-;.., 08 ll'orti ONOSVIN -. ' .- ' .'.- •cc ,/:....-,. " . •_.4 - ---------= _ ,... • .. Exh;bri- A4 . _.„y ... 989400104... M 9 B940oGO3 -1.''' 1 s oe624"Clf. . �. 1aoTo1 ra 9e9400406 y , _I i ' S .. s �..._ 999400102 9T '` 0 ----T ' 0000002f 999400601 t �y �,t. ae9400102( . 91'�8400408_� 9E0400402 7• a, 980400113 96(jg00603µ 5 v 9eaaao4o5`''...4.t� j 0 D s- ' 901024046 �Q40040b fi - . 090400101 ', o� t 000000250 - a \ 989400404 i°:.s '1 • .901024018:1p ' "'"+ ,Y 001024063 A• i i 901013005 t 1001013015 1>D i'- t : ion ':901o1301s i�NS ': i t oYifrs. E moos-. . f 901024038 , 1f = fi- t` I: s - 1 " 901013016 901a24000: - z .` f. E Moles, I , S. 901019014 .lf i 3/ ' f � f `".•,,,_. 90/1013014 kr r�l; ..e.*"'"''';....k. ''''''''',/..: € f :901613013 f � ' I 901024035 ' ', > i i i 901013012 4ra0-Pfts.f. 901024047 St ry i • •4 901013001 40102..4-0 57, /" �� "901013006 �astt 4772000001 ,` • ®u'i� kfe1sCa " GS� w :r :f;Z . APR - 8 2003 '- _ http://maps.co._jefferson.wa.us/output/parcels outside GISSERVER142416808764.jpg 3/10/03 EXHIBIT B Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Description of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment This proposal is a request to rezone a 5.36 acre property from a split designation (Rural Village Center and Rural Residential 1:5)to a single zoning designation of Rural Village Center.This property(tax parcel 901013016)is an abandoned gravel pit that is owned by John T. Shold, Samuel Swanson and Sterling&Sally Huntingford.The NWSWB has an option to purchase this property. The Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding(NWSWB)is a non-profit private institution that would like to move from its current location in Glen Cove to its planned main campus on this 5- acre property.The current split zoning allows about half of this property for campus development per UDC Table 3-1. Under that table a College or Technical School/Adult Education Facility(not state owned) is not allowed in a Rural Residential 1:5 zone.The NWSWB would like to have the entire property for development so that a sensible, expandable and aesthetically pleasing campus can be designed. The NWSWB requested an Un-named Institutional Uses designation for its Heritage Campus activities in 2002, but was rejected by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development This proposed amendment is a further effort to remedy our inability to use the entire property as an adult education facility. The Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding has been developing its Port Hadlock Heritage Campus concept for the last two years.This campus concept includes two properties on the waterfront that are currently owned by the NWSWB. One of the buildings has been repaired and is being used for summer and winter classes not associated with our nine-month associate degree program.The other building is being repaired at this time and is planned to be functional this summer. It will include a large classroom and shop areas. The NWSWB has received a Washington State Heritage Grant that was used to repair one of the waterfront properties and a Washington State DOE Planning Grant that was used to design a Public Access Trail from the Port Hadlock street level, down and around the perimeter of the property in question, down the County easement on Lower Hadlock Road and finally out onto the currently existing NWSWB dock.We recently received a grant from the Washington State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation(IAC)that will provide partial funding for construction in 2004 of a public mooring field, floating dock and gangway. The Exhibit B Plan shows the main elements of the Heritage Campus concept.This Maximum Campus Plan scenario includes some 12 buildings totaling 38,000 sq. ft. and is sized for student and staff population of 88 individuals. This plan also includes a student hostel that would house as many as 24 students during the shorter summer classes and significantly less students during the nine-month program. This Maximum scenario includes future potential growth, but would not be our first build out. Our first campus would be sized for a total of 50-60 students and staff. Eliminating half of this property for development will significantly reduce our site design options. We believe our development at this site will not have a significant negative impact on County services,the environment, adjacent property owners or overall traffic. We will have an impact, but we believe that any negative factors will be overshadowed by positive impacts such as increased revenues to Port Hadlock businesses, increased public access to the beach and dock areas, increased meeting room facilities for community groups and building aesthetics that enhance the "early 20th century"feel of the waterfront. APR - 8 2003 f'PO y�94F .... ), 4)0,c) ` • / •.I CI 2C Z �' ` / -1 r ; • /�a0 m m 'r •y1' •6> H 1 3 'c.::::) !A IF 4'4)p Pp '1, � � ca g m D. x m t✓q 8•ER � � t I X 0 C x/ 3. C 0 > ri ON z ,a vi a D — 1 ri . c r or- / z z.," i * -,t4il 0 1:3 1%....o., 4, • 41)1 * A- 11 I 04,ithh . z ��.. --I `I + i ry My �� o zr r-ea z a �r al 4.-0 ``�, a ty -1 00 .Z7 y = �1R` • xi to o Z £Z c41 ` 3> .... m — .410, ,-- t::1 td(/) v, .SSQL ,y"'*. r Q—I i ti � - 0 o ''N I / �. 24.o -I - . D Z0 - O. . \ii\tis$n - / D - 1) o C 1111,N a m 70 73 O Z —1 '0 A O 'A r*1 73 f1 I E J 1i , 6 l7 a\ 4.00 J "f ‘r"t:J-. ,, ....... ,,,.. ,t ..._. ..z soo ,, s ,,., 0.-P9 Z J W 01. �\ I z3z sr „...(.4‘k\/ %'%''44114111--s.%. *'''''' a +,75:::::: 11 m X W �� o � o ,LLI N ________ i HM /1 W </J� . .._ ,, • ;, ..._ •, .. , ; „ ,,. s,„.. , , , , . . „,.:., ,‘:, „ „ „: :, %= Qo X \ J /7;L ___. . ..._, ,. .......,. ....._.... \ >z Y U • ,, ,,,_ , s ,, ,,, ,, i APR - 8 2003 • • EXHIBIT D Not applicable to this proposal • • (} t` : }�, it •f ;i • APR - 8 2003 • EXHIBIT E Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Item 14 of the Application, explanation of the Rezone 14(a)The only substantial change since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan would be the recent 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle in which this property is in the proposed Tri Area UGA. 14(b)We believe the assumptions that form the basis of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan are still valid. "The Comprehensive Plan is a living document and will change as circumstances, challenges and outside influences change" (pg.XI). We believe our specific request for a site-specific amendment is a change that fits well within the intent and design of the Comprehensive Plan. 14(c)We believe our request is consistent with several of the"basic principles"of the Comp Plan Vision Statement(pg.x).We help"support a healthy,diversified, and sustainable local and regional economy by recognizing existing local businesses...which are compatible with and complementary to the community". The NWSWB has been active in Jefferson County for over 20 years by providing skills to people working in the marine trades. The summer and fall students bring in outside dollars to the tune of between$1-2 million per year that is spent in the County for all manner of living and entertainment expenses. This proposal will help"reinforce and enhance the historic sense of`place'or`community' around traditional population centers" and"..the strengthening of local communities". This property adjoins the current commercial center of Port Hadlock, thus continuing development within a population center. The architectural style of proposed buildings on the site and the current NWSWB properties on the waterfront all will have a"historical"flavor that will be reminiscent of the early part of the 20th century. One of the stated Strategies is(pg. 7-17)"A.Adequate Land and Infrastructure for Economic Development". Under the Action Items for this are the following: 11. (pg.7-18)"Actively promote vocational training and educational opportunities that strengthen and increase the skills available in the local workforce." 12, (pg. 7-18)" Encourage educational outreach programs(WSU,.Peninsula College, Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding, and private programs)designed to train people in recreational and tourist related activities,small scale entrepreneurship,and marine trades." The NWSWB has been teaching people for over 20 years both woodworking and boat building skills. We plan on continuing this core activity in the future and are looking at ways to increase the breath of our curriculum and its effectiveness. One example of this would be the recently initiated Community Woodworking Program that is targeted specifically for County residents. *************************************************** A few points from the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan that this proposal directly r ..__.._. . . - addresses include the following: _ 1) Rural Commercial Land Use(pg. 3-68) LNG 4.2"Encourage a variety of commercial, retail, professional, tourist-related, community service...within the designated boundaries of Rural Village Centers at a •�., scale appropriate to protect the rural character of the natural neighborhood."This 00 ;• proposal would allow the NWSWB to fully develop a campus that is in character and i proportion to the current Port Hadlock community and that supports the heritage of this area both in use and in design. o_ 2) Rural Commercial Land Use(pg. 3-70) LNG 4.6"Ensure visual compatibility of Rural Village Center commercial infill development with the surrounding rural area...shall be scaled and sized to preserve the natural character of the neighborhood."The proposed site is in a"topographic hollow"open to the waterfront and lower than the level of the Hadlock commercial center. This physical separation makes the proposed site more of a waterfront than an upland property. The period design of the buildings on this site will enhance the "waterfront character"of Lower Hadlock. 3) Transportation(pg. 3-87) LNP 17.1 "Encourage development and land use proposals that utilize existing transportation systems and provide non-motorized transportation opportunities."The NWSWB has plans to develop a Public Access Trail(initial design completed through a Washington State DOE Planning Grant)through this property and down to the waterfront,thus, encouraging public use and providing student access to the Port Hadlock businesses for lunches and temporary housing. The proximity of public transportation and this Trail will allow students to live in the area and commute via mass transit. A public easement has recently been granted to Jefferson County for the first leg of this trail between the two NWSWB waterfront buildings. 4) Education - EDG. 2.0(pg.7-11)"Encourage programs aimed at providing education,job training and retraining,and skills enhancement that are responsive to the changing needs of local businesses and residents." EDP 2.1 (pg. 7-11)"Support the expansion of adult education opportunities available to Jefferson County residents who seek vocational training and retraining, skills or knowledge enhancement..." The NWSWB provides an Associate Degree in Occupational Studies through its nine month program as well as a variety of ways to improve specific skills related to the marine trades. r _ _ ********************* This proposal also supports the following goals of the Growth Management Act: 1. Urban Growth(pg. 1-13):"Encourage development on urban areas where • adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient CO ; :: , manner".This proposal is adjacent to existing commercial development in I i Port Hadlock. The public facilities and services needed for future campus c development already exist 2. Transportation(pg. 1-13): "Encourage efficient multimodal transportation Q systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with County --_—- j and City Comprehensive Plans". The future development of the site in _ question will include a Public Access Trail that will reduce the number of :.::.._ - — vehicular trips needed by the NWSWB students and staff and will also allow access to the general public. The Trail is included in the Jefferson County Non-motorized Transportation and Recreational Trail Plans. 14(d)We believe the NWSWB proposal meets the concurrency requirements for transportation in that no capital improvements are needed to accommodate this proposal. We have come to this conclusion based on the following: Initial verbal discussions with Washington State DOT and Jefferson County Public Works Indicate that no capital improvements will need to be made for State Route 116 or to Lower Hadlock Road. Discussions with the DOT were based on the Maximum Planned Campus(88 persons) and it was determined that it would take some 200 left hand turns during peak hours from SR 116 onto Lower Hadlock Road to trigger a traffic study.The maximum campus case is well below that threshold. Conversations with Jefferson County Public Works have centered on a more realistic near term NWSWB population of 60 persons. No significant capital improvements were required as long as the NWSWB continues development of its planned Public Access Trail.This planned trail is included in the recently completed Jefferson County Non-motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan.The Trail will significantly mitigate the lunch time vehicular trips by NWSWB staff and students by providing access from the campus to the Port Hadlock restaurants and food establishments. There will also be bike racks and showers on the five-acre campus plan to encourage bicycle use. The general public will also have access from the town center to their historic waterfront and beaches. Both SR116(Major Collector)and Lower Hadlock Road (Local Access)have an adopted level of service(LOS)standard of C. For SR 116(Table 10-7)from lrondale Road to Flagler Road the LOS Capacity ADT is 7400, Existing ADT 4800 and the forecast ADT for the year 2018 are 5,857.The maximum campus plan will not significantly alter these numbers. For Lower Hadlock Road from Oak Bay Road/SR116 to Water Street the LOS Capacity ADT is 7400, Existing ADT is 584 and forecast ADT for year 2018 is 713.The existing LOS and the forecast LOS for Lower Hadlock Road is both a B. This proposal will have an effect on the current and forecasted numbers, however, minimal increases should occur after the campus build out as there is little room for additional development along the waterfront. 14(e)This proposal will have minimal impact on public services. There is underground electrical power and water just outside this property. NWSWB has recently installed a septic drain field on an adjacent property easement with treatment tanks located on one of our waterfront properties (see Health Department Septic Permit# SEP01-00058). The current road system and planned roads to the campus will provide access for fire and emergency vehicles. 14(f)We believe our proposal is consistent with many specific goals, policies and implementation strategies as stated above. We believe we are attempting to utilize this topographically distinct area in a manner that benefits the NWSWB, surrounding businesses, residents of Port Hadlock and Jefferson County.The proposed usage on this site enhances the future competitiveness of the NWSWB,the maritime heritage of the waterfront area and promotes public access and involvement in both active and passive water-oriented activities such as kayaking, sailing and picnicking. 14(g)We believe this project will not result in significant adverse impact to County services and facilities.The move of the NWSWB to this site from Glen Cove will result in some different service providers and response centers, but the overall net effect to Jefferson County should be negligible. 14(h)To our knowledge this proposal would not place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities. 14(I) (i) Access: This site has existing road access via SR116 and Lower Hadlock Road r with access to and from the campus site via Lower Hadlock Road. The Public Access Trail will also provide pedestrian access from the Port Hadlock level down through the five-acre campus site and then onto the waterfront. (ii) This site has water and electric hookups just off the property boundary.A septic drain field and treatment tanks currently exists and will require only the addition Oo of a few holding tanks and connections to the current system. cif (iii) The physical site is somewhat of a"topographic hollow"that is open to the waterfront.All existing residential and commercial buildings at the Port Hadlock town-center level are at least 30 feet higher than the highest terrace on the property in question.The cottages and café along Water Street are physically separated from view of this site by an intervening ridge. The three existing terraces of this abandoned gravel pit site will allow for a campus plan with somewhat separated areas for buildings,school parking and public boat trailer parking(on a full five-acre campus only). This site is surrounded by both residential and commercial properties.As stated above,we feel this physical site has a natural isolation that will somewhat insulate all inhabitants above our campus from our activities. We also feel the campus will provide a visual transition from a more modem commercial area to a historic waterfront.This proposal seeks commercial zoning for the entire property, instead of the current split,to allow for a full campus development using a"conditional use permitting process per the UDC. 14(j)We do not believe our proposal will create pressure to change the land use designation of other properties as most of the surrounding properties to this site are already developed. Commercial development in the IGvley Center and residential homes on Curtis Street occupy the Port Hadlock level.The Ajax Café, Skunk Island Cottages, Port of Port Townsend boat launch and the two NWSWB owned buildings occupy much of the waterfront level. 14(k)We do not believe this site-specific amendment materially affects the land use and population growth projections.The NWSWB has been in existence for over 20 years so it is assumed that some, if not all, of the NWSWB population and its impact were figured into the original Comprehensive Plan.The move of the school from Glen Cove to this site will merely redistribute that population within Jefferson County. 14(I)The site is located within the Port Hadlock RVC and the Tri-Area UGA. Adequate facilities and services currently exist and this proposal should not significantly impact them. 14(m)As shown in some of the above answers,we believe this proposal is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County in such broad areas as Land Use, Rural Element, Economic Development, Education and Transportation. APR - 8 2003 c° P 4" JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , -+r.1:-"A"b 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend•Washington 98368 ' ** eV.' 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Application for Suggested Comprehensive Plan /UDC Amendment MLA# 03-210 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: JEFFERSON COUNTY Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application.Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by applicant. 2. Any additional information reasonably deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 3. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s) if applicable. Applications for projected-related amendments must include plans and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such amendments that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 4. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed.(Attach additional sheets,if necessary.) The Unified Development Code (UDC) was adopted in December 2000 and became effective as Jefferson County's set of development regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan on January 16.2001. Adoption of the UDC was appealed by the Shine Community Action Council and the Olympic Environmental Council with regard to aroundwater protection and seawater intrusion. The Western Washington Growth Management Hearinas Board(WWGMHB)issued a Compliance Order (No. 01-2-0015)on December 5.2002.which included direction to adopt seawater intrusion policy as a Growth Management Act(GMA)action. The Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)directed staff to establish a placeholder Comprehensive Plan amendment application for the 2003 amendment cycle. This proposal will be developed and refined in the coming months in combination with MLA03-202.a seawater intrusion protection proposal developed by the Planning Commission and currently under review by that body. . 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit B,"proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC) shown in "bill"format, with text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts(e.g.,strikeouts). 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit C,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed amendment, meets,conflicts with, or relates to the following inquiries(NOTE:Simple yes"or"no"responses are unacceptable.) a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? c. Does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? 7. The applir= -by certifies that the statements contained in this application are tale and provide an accurate representation of the p .., ed ,mendment and the applicant(s)hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if, y s ch sta :nt is found to be false. AL SCALF, DI, •-OF • •,, UNITY ■ EVELOPMENT MAY 1,2003 APPLICANT' ATU' � V DATE A Mu►03-210 5/1ro3 Page 1 1414)11 CO JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT «.a, 'v 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 , e 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax httpi/www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdeveiopment/ Master Land Use Permit Application Form MLA03 210 PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Subdivision Name: Lot Number. Property Size: (acres/square feet) Existing Use of Property: Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Not applicable. This is not a site-specific proposal. APPLICANT INFORMATION Board of County Commissioners by and though the Name of Applicant: Department of Community Development Telephone: (360)379-4450 Address: 621 Sheridan St City: Port Townsend State: WA Tip Code: 98368 Name of Authorized Agent(if applicable): N/A Telephone: Address: City: State: Zip Code: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as necessary) The Unified Development Code (UDC) was adopted in December 2000 and became effective as Jefferson County's set of development regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan on January 16,2001. Adoption of the UDC was appealed by the Shine Community Action Council and the Olympic Environmental Council with regard to groundwater protection and seawater intrusion. The Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (WWGMHB) issued a Compliance Order(No. 01-2-0015) on December 5, 2002, which included direction to adopt seawater intrusion policy as a Growth Management Act(GMA)action. The Board of County Commissioners(BOCC) directed staff to establish a piacehoider Comprehensive Plan amendment application for the 2003 amendment cycle. This proposal will be developed and refined in the coming months in combination with MLA03-202, a seawater intrusion protection proposal developed by the Planning Commission and currently under review by that body. PERMITS REQUESTED FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY Please check with Permit Center personnel before completing this section and refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced for more information and further requirements.An asterisk(*)indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire is required. TvDe I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed'Yes'Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 MuO3-210:5/1/03 Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1 O Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 O Short Plat,Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 O Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 O Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 O Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 O Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 O Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) O Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for SFR UDC Section 4.16.5(c) O Temporary Use* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type Ill Permits O Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 O Long Plat,Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 O Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) O Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) O Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 O Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) O Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C O Shoreline Management Substantial Development,Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 O Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 O Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 Type IV Permits O Long Plat,Anal UDC Section 7.4 O PRRD,Final UDC Section 3.6.13 Tvae V Permits O Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 O Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* O Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 Other Local.State or Federal Permits O Please identity any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: Review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may In any way accrue against Jefferson County as a :-• of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County : • its v•• •yees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right •f e ,' �:I expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the applica.• . •,•, ed with : applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the p icant's property shall be requested a •' ur only d rng regular business hours. ' r PA : /'- a (APPU �/„OR A ',..&l •RE-- ENTA VE SIGNATURE) (D ) I here• designate to act as my agent in matters related to this application for permit(s). (APPLICANT SIGNATURE) (DATE The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened o - gered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal la ..,,a as the "Endangered Species Act" or "ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions th; r be un•-rtaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit • • - .If o an endangered species regarding your action(s) even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County deveoopmey code . e Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and a Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below, Si n -4411111.4111■4 Al.'lip t� J V (APP CANT OR AUTHORIZED REP' ' IVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) v MLA03-210:5/1/03 EXHIBIT A MLA03-210 Description of the Proposed Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendments Issue The Unified Development Code(UDC)was adopted in December 2000 and became effective-as Jefferson County's set of development regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan on January 16,2001. Adoption of the UDC was appealed by the Shine Community Action Council and the Olympic Environmental Council with regard to groundwater protection and seawater intrusion. The Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board(WWGMHB)issued a Compliance Order(No.01-2-0015)on December 5,2002,which included direction to adopt seawater intrusion policy as a Growth Management Act(GMA)action. The Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)directed staff to establish a placeholder Comprehensive Plan amendment application for the 2003 amendment cycle. This proposal will be developed and refined in the coming months in combination with MLA03-202,a seawater intrusion protection proposal developed by the Planning Commission and currently under review by that body. Background information is located at this site: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/SEAWATER%20INTRUSION.htm. Board of County Commissioners Concern Compliance Order No.01-2-0015 gives the County until June 5,2003 to take action to comply with the GMA. The BOCC has directed staff to prepare a placeholder Comprehensive Plan amendment as part of the on-going compliance effort. Department of Community Development Recommendation DCD has no recommendation at this time. After June 5, 2003, the deadline for GMA compliance, DCD will prepare Comprehensive Plan amendments associated with compliance actions taken by the County. Affected CP and UDC Sections To be determined. • MLAO3-210 Era,.n Soros Page 1 EXHIBIT B MLA03-210 Proposed Line-In/Line-Out Comprehensive Plan & UDC Amendment Language To be determined. MLA03-210 Exh.B:5/1/03 Page 1 EXHIBIT C MLA03-21 0 Submittal Requirement #6 Please prepare and label as"Exhibit C,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed amendment, meets,conflicts with,or relates to the following inquiries. (NOTE:Simple"yes"or"no"responses are unacceptable:) - a Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? This application is the result of a Compliance Order from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? This application is the result of a Compliance Order from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. c. Does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? This application is the result of a Compliance Order from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. [END] MLAO3-210 Ear.c 5/1/03 Page 1 ENVIRONMENT EXHIBIT B MLA03-210 ENVIRONMENT ELEMENT PURPOSE: The purpose of the Environment Element is to describe specific criteria and review processes, and to identify regulations to achieve a balance between land development and use activities and environmental protection,consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN The complexity of the issues associated with environmental protection requires that several other elements of the Comprehensive Plan address specific aspects of these issues and propose methods to address them. However,the Environment Element integrates the specific perspectives and methods from other elements that address environmental protection. Background information on environmental conditions and issues can be found in Appendix E of this Plan. The following table summarizes the environmental protection issues identified and addressed in other elements of the Plan: Element Discussion 1. Land Use/Rural Environmental features are important components of the rural character of Jefferson County. Shorelines, wildlife habitat, and water resources contribute to a sense of place and enhance the quality of life through natural ecological functions.Unmanaged,sprawling growth is the most significant threat to environmental quality in Jefferson County. In order to protect the public health and welfare, land use regulations are developed that respect the rights of property owners and preserve environmental functions. 2.Natural Resources Natural resource lands provide important environmental functions, Conservation including surface water protection, habitat enhancement, and ground water recharge. Mineral lands can be reclaimed in a manner that provides enhanced environmental functions. Significant environmental features on natural resource lands should be preserved through the use of best management practices(BMPs). 3. Open Space,Parks and Open space is fundamental for environmental protection and Recreation enhancement. New policies are developed for the preservation of the County's significant environmental features through the use of an enhanced open space network. 4. Utilities• Protection and management of water resources as a necessary public supply is linked to water system policies. Protection of existing water supplies and development of future supplies should be consistent with the protection of water resources and related environmental resources. Water resource protection also requires a storm water management plan that is integrated with a comprehensive watershed approach. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-1 August 28,1998 ENVIRONMENT 5. Capital Facilities Recent population growth has raised concerns regarding the ability of surface and ground water sources to meet demand. The demands include not only public supply, but also those for habitat, recreation, and aesthetics. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES Jefferson County believes that a healthy environment is fundamental to the quality of life of its citizens. While protection of the environment is a primary goal of the GMA planning process, neither the text of the Act nor the decisions of the Hearings Boards define specifically how this is to be accomplished. Therefore, for the purposes of this plan, Jefferson County has adopted a working definition of environmental protection which is based on the relationship between four essential components: • Watershed and Fish Habitat Recovery Management Strategy; • Regulatory Strategy for Consolidated Environmental Review; • Critical Areas Protection Strategy;and, • Public Education and Involvement Strategy. Watershed and Fish Habitat Recovery Management Strategy A Watershed and Fish Habitat Recovery Management Strategy recognizes the interconnected nature of environmental resources through the hydrologic cycle, and the necessity to develop comprehensive watershed and fisheries recovery management plans as the framework for resource management. The 1998 proposed listings of salmon and bull trout species as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act, including the Hood Canal Summer Chum and the Puget Sound Chinook require that Jefferson County develop land use regulations to protect habitat based on integrated watershed and salmon habitat recovery plans. The County expects to work with local,tribal,state and federal agencies to develop land use regulations based on these plans that protect the water resources of the County for use by future residents and for the fish species that are threatened with extinction,as well as all other species. Watershed management of hydrological resources addresses .wetlands, shorelines, surface waters, aquifer recharge, landslide hazards, flood hazards, and frequently flooded areas. It incorporates management of instream flow volumes and storm water quality and quantity. It has a direct impact on and is integrally related to the protection of fish and wildlife habitat. The 1997 state legislature enacted laws which establish the framework for watershed and fish habitat recovery planning. Jefferson County,a member of the Jefferson County Water Resources Council, will work with adjacent counties and other parties to develop watershed management plans on which land use regulatory decisions will be based. The goals and policies of the Environment Element reflect the County's commitment to resource management based on watershed and fish habitat recovery planning. As watershed plans are translated into land use regulations, a number of programs may be affected. Table 8-1 below provides an overview of the County regulatory issues for various water uses, and the Comprehensive Plan elements in which some of these issues are addressed. The primary agencies and laws with regulatory authority or involvement for the various water uses are listed in Table 8-2. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-2 August 28, 1998 ENVIRONMENT Table 8-1 - Water Resources: Uses,Regulatory Issues,and Comprehensive Plan Elements Waiter Resource. ' `Water:Uses Minty Regulatory Issues Comprehensive. -:t `•'`�'�," �",��h � „'"`iNIJJff pri '[Rtil6b•.i� s_ xEE�,,, .� _ _, tt' .,,-Rho- 1..m v3•F�'� '� +, - 1..':'F- r:vy. •' _ - i5`syr-r te•7.. ;,-'27"1„.. t..t ,� r - ` •'4:'c'J` • •y`, 4..;? .� .. L.. f si - _— Potable Water Supply: Aquifer recharge, Utilities—water systems, Domestic/Commercial wellhead protection, individual wells,wellhead and Municipal storm water, protection,storm water water quality, Environment—aquifer recharge, water system planning, water quality Ground Water& individual wells Surface Water Uses aquifer recharge, Utilities—water systems, Industrial stone water, wellhead protection,storm water water system planning, Environment—aquifer recharge, wellhead protection, water quality water quality aquifer recharge, Utilities—storm water storm water, Environment—aquifer recharge, Agricultural water quality, flooding,wetlands,habitat, flooding, aquifer protection,water quality wetlands, Capital Facilities—flood fish/wildlife habitat, management aquifer protection instream flows, Utilities—storm water Fish/Wildlife; storm water, Environment—instream flows, Instream Flows Recreation; water quality flooding,wetlands,habitat, Hydropower fish/wildlife habitat, shorelines,water quality flood management, Capital Facilities—flood shorelines management, management wetlands fish/wildlife habitat, Environment—habitat,shellfish, Fish/Wildlife; shellfish protection areas, wetlands,shorelines,water Marine Shellfish; wetlands, quality. Recreation shorelines management, Utilities—storm water storm water, water quality Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-3 August 28,1998 ENVIRONMENT Table 8-2 Water Resources: Responsible Agencies and Applicable Laws* Water Water Uses-. Federal Authority-and State Authority and Local Authorityini4livS Resource r - Environmental Laws. Laws Potable Sutmly: Agencies—Environmental Agencies—Depts of A oncies—Planning Department; Ground Water Protection Agency Ecology and Health Public Works;County Health Quality/Quantity Legal:Clean Water Act,Ground Lem—Ground Water Department . Management water guidelines,Safe Drinking Quality Standards, I.egaf—Critical Areas Ordinance; Water Act Surface Water Quality Coordinated Water System Plan Standards,Water Code Potable Sunaly: Agencies_Environmental Agencies—Department Agencies—County Health Ground Drinking Water • Protection Agency of Health Department;Planning Water& al—Safe Drinking Water Act Department Surface —Critical Areas Ordinance; Water Uses Coordinated Water System Plan Industrial encies_Environmental A encies—Department Agencies—Planning Department Protection Agency of Ecology Legal—Clean Water Act Legal:NPDES regulations,Water Code Agricultural Agencies—Environmental Agencies—Department c A ncies—Planning Department; Protection Agency;U.S. of Ecology;Department Public Works;Washington State Department of Agriculture;Natural of Agriculture University Cooperative Resource Conservation Service Legal—Water Code, Extension;Conservation District Legal—Clean Water Act Surface Water Quality Standards Agencies—Environmental Protection Agency;U.S.Dept of Agencies—Department Agencies—Planning Department; the Interior,U.S.Dept.of Fish and of Ecology;Department Public Works Fish/Wildlife Wildlife;U.S.Forest Service; of Natural Resources; Legal—Critical Areas Ordinance; Iastream Recreation Bureau of Indian Affairs;National Department of Fish and Shoreline Master Program Flows Hydropower Park Service;Federal Energy Wildlife Regulatory Commission,Army Legal- Water Code Corps of Engineers,Bureau of Reclamation al—Clean Water Act; Endangered Species Act;Indian Treaty Rights Agencies—Department Agencies—.Planning Department; Agencies—Environmental of Ecology;Department Public Works;County Health Fisk/Wildl je Protection Agency;y;U.S. of Natural Resources; Department Marine Shellfish Department of the Interior;U.S. Department of Fish and —Critical Areas Ordinance; Recreation Department of Fish and Wildlife; Wildlife;Department of Shoreline Master Program Bureau of Indian Affairs;National Health Marine Fisheries;Army Corps of Legal—Shellfish Engineers Certification,Surface Legal—Clean Water Act; Water Quality Endangered Species Act Standards *This list of laws and agencies is not all-inclusive,but lists those most frequently encountered on the local level. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-4 August 28,1998 • ENVIRONMENT Regulatory Strategy for Consolidated Environmental Review A Regulatory Strategy for Consolidated Environmental Review is an approach that combines various state and local environmental protection programs within a single regulatory framework. By encouraging inter-agency cooperation and integrating these programs into a'unified implementation strategy, the review process is simplified and made more efficient, thereby making environmental protection more comprehensive,effective and predictable. Environmental review concentrates on those land development and use activities that have the greatest potential to have significant cumulative impact on the natural systems of the County. As a response to the current deficiencies of the local regulatory framework in regard to environmental protection, the County's regulatory strategy includes the adoption and implementation of the following: 1. A Clearing and Grading Ordinance that provides criteria and defines a threshold to ensure adequate protection of critical areas and associated buffers for all types of significant land uses and land-disturbing activities. 2. An amended Storm Water Ordinance that will adequately address the important issues of storm water management and conservation. 3. Special Environmental Overlay Districts created for areas of Jefferson County that are characterized by unique environmental protection needs. For example, Marrowstone Island has been designated a "Sole-Source Aquifer Area" by the Department of Ecology, and, as such, requires specific policies addressing its unique features and concerns, such as salt water intrusion. The regulatory strategy for consolidated permit review is presented in the Comprehensive Plan through goals and policies that provide guidelines for types and thresholds of protection for each resource area. The action items under the regulatory strategy address the ordinances that will need to be written, revised, or amended, as well as the collection of scientific data on which to base permit decisions. Coordination with state and local agencies is included in order to streamline the multiple jurisdictional levels of review for many activities. Critical Areas Protection Strategy The Critical Areas Protection Strategy describes the regulations and methodologies used to protect the critical environmental areas found throughout Jefferson County. Protection and enhancement of critical areas were determined by the state legislature to be essential to the maintenance of public health and safety. The designation of Critical Areas in Jefferson County was guided by GMA requirements, state guidelines, and a extensive local review process (see Appendix E). In 1994, the Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance was adopted. The ordinance was amended on June 26, 1995 to add provisions for the protection of Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. The ordinance incorporates by reference the Jefferson County Floodplain Management Ordinance(Ordinance#1-89) for the regulation of frequently flooded areas, with language added that identifies these critical areas according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year floodplain designations. The Interim Critical Areas Ordinance designates and regulates the following critical areas as required under RCW 36.70A.030(5): Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-5 August 28, 1998 ENVIRONMENT • Wetlands; • Aquifer recharge areas; • Frequently flooded areas; • Geologically hazardous areas;and, • Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.060(3), the Interim Critical Areas Ordinance will be reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan prior to its adoption as a filial ordinance. Provisions may be revised based on the review, for example, of regulations protecting fish and wildlife habitat that may need to be revised in light of the proposed listing of fish species under the Endangered Species Act. -The regulatory protection of critical areas will improve as the data base of information is developed over time. Action items under this strategy include continuing to inventory and map environmental conditions,which will increase the efficiency and the level of protection over the 20-year period of this plan. Critical Areas maps will be updated as new scientific information becomes available. Public Education and Involvement Strategy A Public Education and Involvement Strategy has been included in the Environmental Element in recognition of the importance of public awareness and involvement to the success of an environmental protection program. Education regarding measures and regulations designed to protect property owners from environmental hazards will improve compliance with these regulations. In addition,when property owners of existing development are educated regarding natural processes and resource protection, they are likely to better manage their property,to seek assistance early,and to avoid taking actions which may cause problems on their own or nearby land. A public involvement approach is also far more cost-efficient for both property owners and the County, in that addressing problems in advance is generally less costly than being forced to address them after they have become critical. Jefferson County's commitment to public education and involvement through the action items of this strategy will result in more effective protection of resources, the protection of life and property, and a population of residents who are more informed about, supportive of, and individually active in environmental protection. COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION In order to address the environment in a comprehensive manner, Jefferson County has developed additional environmental goals and policies for protection of the following: • Shorelines • Air quality • Natural heritage vegetation and landforms • View and noise conditions The implementation of this Plan through a revision of County ordinances will be guided by the goals and policies for these areas. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-6 August 28,1998 ENVIRONMENT Shorelines - Jefferson County contains significant shoreline resources, with approximately 202 miles of saltwater shoreline, 367 miles of streams, and 14 miles of lake shoreline. Over 80 percent of the shorelines in Eastern Jefferson County are privately owned, while most of the shorelines in the West End along the Pacific Ocean are managed by the National Park Service. In addition to providing fish, shellfish, and wildlife habitat,the shorelines of Jefferson County have value for residential and economic uses. Shorelines of the State are regulated under the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). Amendments to the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program must be approved by the Department of Ecology and must comply with the State law. Shoreline permits issued by the County are reviewed by the State for compliance with State law. The County's Shoreline Management Master Program will be revised in the next several years to comply with the Growth Management Act, based on a review for consistency with this Comprehensive Plan and on guidelines currently being developed by the State. The revised Master Program will be adopted as an element of the Comprehensive Plan. During the interim period prior to adoption of a revised Shoreline Management Master Program, where shoreline regulations conflict with other ordinances,the more restrictive regulations shall apply. The marine shorelines of Eastern Jefferson County have been developed at a rapid rate in some areas over the past several decades. In some areas,adverse impacts to the environment have occurred in terms of fish habitat damage, water quality degradation, altered patterns of sediment transport, and landslides where drainage and construction measures have exacerbated the instability of bluffs. Because activities in one area of the shoreline can have significant impacts in other shoreline areas,permit review processes must recognize the interdependence of shoreline landform stability and habitat with shoreline transport systems,drainage systems,and geologic conditions. The goals,policies,and strategies for shorelines address the regulation of the shoreline for the protection of environmental functions,and the coordination of permitting decisions with state agencies responsible for environmental protection. In addition,because of the potential property damage that can result for a landowner and nearby properties if natural processes are ignored, the goals and policies of this plan include protection of property from the individual or cumulative effects of shoreline development. Public access and public education are also included as components that promote shoreline protection and enjoyment. Air Quality Air quality throughout Jefferson County is generally good. The Olympic Air Pollution Control Authority, with regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act, attributes air pollution on the Olympic Peninsula to motor vehicles, outdoor burning, industrial emissions, and residential wood.stoves. Air quality in East Jefferson County is more of a concern than that of the West End, given the higher concentrations of development and population. Occasional burning bans which include the use of wood-burning stoves are declared when regional weather conditions result in a decrease in regional air quality. Over the next 20 years the population growth in East Jefferson County may contribute to a decrease in air quality, in particular along major transportation routes. The Environment Element proposes policies and strategies to address the long- term air quality of the County. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-7 August 28, 1998 ENVIRONMENT Natural Heritage Vegetation and Landforms - Jefferson County's natural environment includes native vegetation, ecosystems, and landforms which have value to the community as the basis of its natural heritage. It is the intent of the County to protect areas of native ecosystems and to promote the use of native vegetation. Natural landforms and geologic outcrops with educational and scientific value, are included as having natural -heritage value, and protection of these areas is encouraged for the education and enjoyment of future residents. View and Noise Conditions- The mountain, water, and valley views found in Jefferson County have significant value for County residents and visitors. County residents depend on these scenic resources for enriching their quality of life and maintaining economic vitality. Tourist activities and real estate property values reflect the high value placed on this aesthetic amenity. There are currently no regulations for the protection of views and viewsheds. A public discussion during the process of developing ordinances to implement the Comprehensive Plan can be used to determine the extent to which citizens feel that view protection should be regulated. Given the rural nature of the County,there is very little light or glare"pollution"of concern to residents. Protection of the rural character of the community includes protection from excessive light and glare that may accompany development. In rural Jefferson County the noise of a neighbor's chain saw is generally an accepted part of life, and noise conditions have not generally been considered a problem. Resolving the impacts of growth in a changing rural area may require a level of noise regulation that will be determined in public processes for development of ordinances following approval of the Comprehensive Plan. CRITICAL AREAS MAPS Maps are provided on the following pages that depict the location of critical areas identified by Jefferson County. Not all critical areas have been mapped. Jefferson County will continue to improve the information on which permit processing is based,in order to protect the public from inappropriate development and to protect the functions and values of critical areas. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 8-8 August 28, 1998 JEFFERSON COUNTY ,-:-(•'°4311, -*k'. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 3' 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax httpi/www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Application for Suggested Comprehensive Plan /UDC Amendment MLA# 03-209 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: JEFFERSON COUNTY Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application.Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by applicant. 2. Any additional information reasonably deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 3. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s) if applicable. Applications for projected-related amendments must include plans and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such amendments that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 4. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed.(Attach additional sheets,if necessary.) The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) adopted Ordinance No. 05-0428-03 on April 28. 2003. amending the Unified Development Code (UDC) with regard to the regulation of existing and ongoing agriculture. among other topics. This Comprehensive Plan amendment application is part of "Step Two" of 2003 Agricultural Lands Planning. Using grant funds from Washington State. the Department of Community Development (DCD) will coordinate a public outreach process to ascertain interest in the"Agricultural Lands of Local Significance"program cited in the Comprehensive Plan. Working with the Planning Commission. DCD will develop a comprehensive Agricultural Lands package that will/mav include land use map amendments,clarification in the Comprehensive Plan and/or UDC of various Agricultural Lands designations. reconsideration of UDC regulations as applied to Agricultural Lands(uses allowed Der Table 3-1 in particular),and other unfinished Agricultural Lands planning tasks as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The package will be refined during the months of May and June (Der the State grant) and reviewed in public process with the Planning Commission and BOCC. 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit B,"proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC) shown in "bill"format, with text to be added indicated with underlining (e.g., underlining), and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts(e.g.,stakeouts). 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit C,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed amendment, meets,conflicts with, or relates to the following inquiries(NOTE:Simple"yes"or"no"responses are unacceptable.) a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? c. Does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? 7. The apps•, •., by certifies that the statements contained in this application are true and provide an accurate representation of the p *•. : a :'dment;and the applicant(s)hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked 4 ,ch s,:tement'- found to be false. AL Sc'A-glegAtire..a.,lifi•EVELOPMENT MAY 1,2003 APP a S- Mrriirr DATE MLA03-2O9:5/1/03 Page 1 vosaN ' ' JEFFERSON COUNTY g. s J SO COU DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT =e "'° 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend•Washington 98368 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Master Land Use Permit Application Form MLA03 209 PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number. 000000000 Subdivision Name: Lot Number: Property Size: (acres/square feet) Existing Use of Property: Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Not applicable. This is not a site-specific proposal. APPLICANT INFORMATION Board of County Commissioners by and though the Name of Applicant: Department of Community Development Telephone: (360)379-4450 Address: 621 Sheridan St City: Port Townsend State: WA Zip Code: 98368 Name of Authorized Agent(if applicable): N/A Telephone: Address: City: State: Zip Code: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as necessary) The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) adopted Ordinance No. 05-0428-03 on April 28, 2003, amending the Unified Development Code(UDC)with regard to the regulation of existing and ongoing agriculture,among other topics. This Comprehensive Plan amendment application is part of "Step Two" of 2003 Agricultural Lands planning. Using grant funds from Washington State,the Department of Community Development(DCD) will coordinate a public outreach process to ascertain interest in the"Agricultural Lands of Local Significance" program cited in the Comprehensive Plan. Working with the Planning Commission, DCD will develop a comprehensive Agricultural Lands package that wllVmay include land use map amendments, clarification in the Comprehensive Plan and/or UDC of various Agricultural Lands designations, reconsideration of UDC regulations as applied to Agricultural Lands (uses allowed per Table 3-1 in particular), and other unfinished Agricultural Lands planning tasks as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The package will be refined during the months of May and June and reviewed in public process with the Planning Commission and BOCC. PERMITS REQUESTED FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY Please check with Permit Center personnel before completing this section and refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced for more Information and further requirements.An asterisk(*)indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire is required. TWO I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC ❑ Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 32.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 MLAO3-209:5/1/03 ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1 ❑ Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat,Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 ❑ Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Variance,Minor* UDC Section 8.9 -- - ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for SFR UDC Section 4.16.5(c) ❑ Temporary Use* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type Ill Permits ❑ Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat,Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) ❑ Variance,Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development,Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 Type IV Permits ❑ Long Plat,Final UDC Section 7.4 ❑ PRRD,Final UDC Section 3.6.13 Type V Permits ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 ❑ Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 Other Local,State or Federal Permits ❑ Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: Review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a = •, of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and •- , representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of : , : I expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application h:,. co • :• with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to th ap licant's property shall be d requeste -Ai : •.►-.t. •u • regular business hours. ' O IV 3 (APPUC OR AUTHORIZED REP- :a1, E SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate to act as my ent in matters related to this application for permit(s). (APPLICANT SIGNATURE) (DA The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or enda••ered species and could lead to a potential`take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law kno th- "Endangered Species Act" or"ESA.-Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be • : en •ecause this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behal ` iota, • .ngered species regarding your actions) even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code`' •• •nt acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying :: has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. r 0 (APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV-SIGMA URE) (DATE) MLA03-209:5/1/03 EXHIBIT A MLA03-209 Description of the Proposed Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendments Issue The Comprehensive Plan,adopted in 1998,describes unfinished tasks with regard to Agricultural Lands planning. This application package is slated to complete some or all of the tasks. In particular,residents interested in petitioning the County for involvement in the"Agricultural Lands of Local Significance"program cited in the Comprehensive Plan will have an opportunity to do so during the 2003 Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle without having to submit a formal Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. Background information can be found in a DCD staff memorandum to the Planning Commission,dated February 13,2003 and located at this site:http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/Agriculture.htm. Board of County Commissioners Concern On April 21, 2003, the BOCC unanimously sanctioned a placeholder Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal with regard to 2003 Agricultural Lands planning. Department of Community Development Recommendation DCD will be developing a recommended proposal together with the Planning Commission during the months of May and June. Affected CP and UDC Sections The affected sections are undetermined at this juncture. Anticipated for amendment are the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and the use table(Table 3-1) of the UDC. MLA03-209 Ems.A 5/1/03 Page 1 EXHIBIT B MLA03-209 Proposed Line-In/Line-Out Comprehensive Plan & UDC Amendment Language To be developed during the 2003 Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle. MLA03-209 Exh•B:5/1/03 Page 1 EXHIBIT C MLA03-209 Submittal Requirement #6 Please prepare and label as"Exhibit C,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed amendment,meets,conflicts with,or relates to the following inquiries. (NOTE:Simple"yes"or"no"responses are unacceptable:) a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? The BOCC adopted Unified Development Code(UDC)amendments on April 28, 2003 in relation to the regulation of existing and ongoing agriculture. These amendments are the implementation of an agreement between Jefferson County and the Washington Environmental Council(WEC) in relation to a WEC petition to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (WWGMHB) with regard to the adoption of the UDC. This amendment process is an integral"Step Two"to 2003 Agricultural Lands planning. b. Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid,or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? The 1998 Comprehensive Plan describes unfinished Agricultural Lands planning tasks. This amendment process is Intended to complete some or all of those unfinished tasks. c. Does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? DCD will coordinate a public outreach process using grant funds from Washington State. The public process associated with the development and review of this application package should provide insight into this question. The BOCC,representing Jefferson County citizens,sanctioned the initiation of this process. [END] MLA03-209 Exh.C:5/1/03 Page 1 NATURAL RESOURCES EXHIBIT B /11LAO3-209 regulation of mineral extraction sites less than three (3) acres in size, and will consider regulations for protection of the environment from activities at these small sites. Agricultural Lands Classification and Designation ofAgricaltural Land Designations for agricultural lands are based on prime agricultural soils identified in the Natural Resources Conservation Service's Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Washington. The following additional guidelines have been provided by the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development 1. The availability of public facilities; 2. Tax status; 3. The availability of public services; ' 4. Relationship or proximity to Urban Growth Areas; 5. Predominant parcel size; 6. Land use settlement patterns and their compatibility with agricultural practices; 7. Intensity of nearby land uses and their compatibility with agricultural practices;. 8. History of land development permits issued nearby; 9. Land values under alternative uses;and, 10. Proximity to markets. Several of the above indicators were analyzed to assess the long-term commercial viability of lands currently in agricultural use. Table 4-2 Guidelines for Classification of Agricultural Resource Lands in Jefferson County Indicator Comments 1: Availability of Public Facilities and Since lands within Urban Growth Areas(UGAs)are intended Services and Proximity to Urban to be served by public facilities and services within a twenty Growth Areas year period, agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance should be located outside of the UGA boundaries. 2. Tax Status Agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance should be eligible for enrollment in the Open Space Agricultural Tax Program. 3. Parcel Size Agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance should be composed of large parcels. 4. Land Use Settlement Patterns and To provide sufficient buffering and setbacks,agricultural lands - Their Compatibility with of long-term canmercial significance should be adjacent to Agricultural Practices large parcels. 5. Proximity of Markets Agricultural lands of long-term commercial 'significance should have access to transportation networks for access to local and regional markets. Factors involved include the type of crop and intensity of agricultural uses. In order to conserve the agricultural resource land base in Jefferson County and maintain the farming industry while recognizing the diversity of agricultural land owners, Agricultural Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance consist of two classes: Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-8 August 2/3,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES • Lands lying within the designated"Agricultural Production Districts"and, • Agricultural Lands of Local Significance which are designated by the County through the voluntary action of the owner who successfully petitions to "opt-in" to the designation and receive its associated protections and benefits. Agricultural Production Districts Agricultural Production Districts should predominantly consist of those lands with the following characteristics: • More than fifty per cent(50%)of the parcel consists of Prime Farmland, as designated by the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S.Department of Agriculture; • the parcel is nominally twenty(20)acres or greater in size; • the parcel is adjacent to parcels of at least 3 acres in size on 75%or more of its perimeter; • the land is currently being used for commercial agricultural purposes;and, • is participating in the Open Space Agricultural Tax Program. Agricultural Production Districts are areas where farming is the principal and preferred activity. To accomplish this, the primary zoning in the Agricultural Production Districts will be Commercial Agricultural Lands (AG-20). Some land is included in the Agricultural Production Districts that is not currently in agricultural production and is currently devoted either to open land, forestry or low density residential uses. This land is included for the following reasons: • To prevent the"checkerboarding"that characterized the Interim Agricultural Ordinance; • To minimize the potential for viable agricultural activities to be compromised by the development of incompatible adjacent land uses;and, • To allow for potential expansion of agricultural uses. The Agricultural Production Districts include nearly all the currently farmed land in Eastern Jefferson County. These districts have been established in the following areas: • Beaver Valley Agricultural District; • Chimacum-Center Valley Agricultural District; • Discovery Bay Delta/Snow Creek Agricultural District; • Quilcene River Delta Agricultural District;and, • Tarboo Creek Valley Agricultural District. These designated Agricultural Production Districts are represented on the Agricultural Lands of Long- Term Significance Map included in this chapter. Agricultural Land of Local Significance In order to stimulate agricultural diversity and to maintain a stable land base for future agricultural growth, the owner of a parcel may petition the County for designation as Agricultural Land of Local Significance. This designation should offer all the protection and benefits of lands designated as an Agricultural Production District,provided the parcel meets all of the following criteria: Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-9 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES • No part of the parcel lies within the boundaries of an Urban Growth Area Boundary; • The parcel is a minimum of five(5)acres; • The subject property is surrounded by parcels no smaller than three (3) acres in size on 100% of its perimeter, • The parcel meets the definition of agricultural land provided by the Agricultural Land Ordinance;and, • The parcel is currently used or managed for commercial agriculture purposes. The Regulatory Framework for Agriculture The current Interim Agricultural Lands Ordinance (Ordinance 08-0525-95), was adopted in 1995. A permanent Agricultural Lands Ordinance will be adopted based on a review of the interim ordinance for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The interim ordinance establishes criteria for the designation, conservation, and regulation of Agricultural Production Districts and Agricultural Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance. The ordinance also creates an opt-in process for the designation of Agricultural Lands of Local Significance that will be adopted in the final ordinance. Development regulations will recognize the diversity of agricultural land uses and practices and will allow compatible, non-farming uses while protecting agricultural lands from conflicting uses. Criteria should be developed to assess the compatibility of non-agriculture uses with Agricultural Lands. Residential densities will not exceed one(1)dwelling unit per twenty(20)acres. Clustering techniques will be considered in agricultural areas subject to specific criteria to ensure that the development is compatible with farming use. In order to protect the property rights of agriculture landowners and maintain the agriculture industry, a Right to Practice Agriculture provision of the interim ordinance will be adopted as part of the final ordinance. Protections containted in this ordinance should apply to all designated agricultural land that complies with best agriculture management practices as described in the ordinance. Many individual farms are in rural areas where low density land uses present fewer conflicts with agriculture. Continued farming on such parcels will be encouraged through residential zoning that maintains large lots and low densities, and treats farming as a permitted use. For further discussion of these issues,please refer to the Land Use and Rural Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Aquaculture Resources Class/ ation and Designation of Aquaculture Resources The Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development does not issue guidelines for the classification of aquaculture resource lands. Although the Growth Management Act does not specifically include aquaculture lands as natural resource lands requiring protection and conservation, Jefferson County has elected to do so in recognition of the importance of commercial aquaculture to the local and regional economy. The statutory basis for designation of aquaculture land as Agricultural Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance is RCW 36.70A.030(2), the defmition of agricultural land as: "...land primarily devoted to the commercial production of horticultural,viticultural,floricultural,dairy, apiary,vegetable,or animal products or berries,grain,hay,straw,turf, seed,Christmas trees not subject to the excise tax imposed by RCW 84.33.100 through 8433.140, fmfish in upland hatcheries, or livestock, and that has long-term commercial significance for agricultural production." Shellfish are included under animal products,while fmfish in upland hatcheries were amended to the definition under ESSB 6228 in 1994. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-10 August 28,1998 • NATURAL RESOURCES The following aquaculture resources are designated as Agricultural Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance in accordance with the classification and designation of Agricultural Land as discussed above: • Upland finfish hatcheries;and, • Commercial shellfish beds and their upland facilities. The owners of shellfish beds that are not designated as Long-Term Commercially Significant may petition the County for classification as Agricultural Land of Local Significance in order to gain the protections and benefits provided by the designation. . The Regulatory Framework for Aquaculture Lands Aquaculture Resources will be included in the final Agricultural Lands Ordinance. The Interim Agricultural Lands Ordinance will be reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan prior to adoption as a fmal ordinance in order to establish criteria and processes for the designation of upland finfish hatcheries and commercial shellfish beds as Agricultural Lands of Long-Term Commercial Significance. The interim ordinance includes an opt-in process for owners of shellfish beds to petition to be designated as Agricultural Lands of Local Significance. The regulations for aquaculture lands as designated in the final Agricultural Lands Ordinance must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (SMMP). The Shoreline Management Master Program will be revised following adoption of the Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the goals and policies of the Plan. Aquaculture development, including but not limited to the construction of structures or bulkheads, dredging, filling, driving piles, or any project that interferes with the normal public use of surface waters overlying tidelands,is currently regulated under the Shoreline Management Master Program within shoreline areas. Shoreline jurisdiction generally extends from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to approximately 200 feet landward and from the OHWM seaward to the offshore County line. During the revision of the SMMP, conflicts between inconsistent provisions of the Agricultural Lands Ordinance and the SMMP will be resolved by relying on the more restrictive provision. Development regulations will be adopted that recognize the diversity of aquaculture practices and uses of aquaculture resources. These regulations should consider allowing compatible, non-aquaculture uses while protecting aquaculture resources from conflicting uses. Criteria should be developed to assess the compatibility of non-aquaculture uses on Aquaculture Lands. Land-based fish rearing and marine-based shellfish facilities require high quality water to operate. As described in the Environment Element of the Comprehensive Plan, Jefferson County should identify potential gaps in existing environmental protections and develop comprehensive regulations to further enhance and protect water quality,based on a watershed management approach. A comprehensive land clearing and grading ordinance will be developed to protect surface and ground water quality and quantity, control storm water runoff, and minimize potential damage to fish and wildlife habitat. For more information on a clearing and grading ordinance, please refer to the Environment Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-11 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES Jeffery County Comprehensive Plan 4-12 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES I RANGE 02 W RANGE Ol IS f RANGE Ot E z I Fi P: V z S. AA. 6,"sprit;I.. S. f ` t 40A„ ._,..,, . ..__„61,71:_ YN7l� Ni,. . . ...g 1 iiiEL i i .110 Ali bli , . . ... ; Iii ,-.:,!; ,r,I) • 1 ---r---h---t-- r- ��: ';\ ' �:i a - 1 - 1 .. / 3 I ' : ' � AIL $ U. o 4 4--4_ -r---r l-- .4 1 R m - • 1 • l■ t Miles kl "` ' 1, • • 111V . _ [ r,_i___.' '- __ � ti ?-112--- , .„'_� III 4, it 1 bllijk. : r” IP', — �••^-k- 711 ti• • ni..iiii, i � _ .-1 * 4-f '1 igiy°11. iii, . . •ke_i.:41- --‘19,44 ; �" --• PRBQ FARMLAND SOIL C01112 • Mill 1.•TGID.EAR QT --1----i---1-- Pie • E on 81[80. 0R al P0.7H z_ : - ---h---t---i---h---lid ---'- 5 s to EE OK alt W.WA b i i i • •eeWa LlOmna•cLaaV••b _ --t" 011R31CP to the tattooing.timitatioac 's-i__ ...... ' CORE LOIrfA'110N III „ : a► 1* t AR areas w pima hraleoL ` m 4)1"11146�. ! ab d•.le.A wee w prism lendeai IR , , K 0 wry pwaettt�ew a�a mty 4 --'f.--r--�t �•[tr • • s fl &WOW area peoteetat Rome Boollq or set frequently • , fluidal Aur4e w revise oar an pram armored. w t•� '�l MnIrT161 1.PURPOSES•1., PRIME FARMLAND SOILS " ""'""" """°"` m..sT�o of.ro e•e ry AREAL J EASTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY ""^" "` RevISEa FCOFY Ilk- .,__. mere —. �' _ RANGE ce tr I RANGE 01 1 I RANCE 01 E I Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4425 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES RANGE 02 W RANGE 01 W I RANGE 01 E z w°. i l' ...,.. ■.... - E..1.111•1 WWI..-. = --N .•1M : 1W.. ..glir ; ,.•,lbe „,. - . -InL us, U Moe i,r•.; •ce:, . Ai. I. 1. 1 N li,-::: fl.Iii— ."-• 111 -.--- t I ma, .. .. RINI t • - ,'.ir 7.`. • 11.• ■:::.* . - . I ...., ■ A . ,. te.. "Al? :AIR!,Ir.. II WNW:+0. li ..k. .■..... . . '1umnr■1111:-". , ' . .. ...„„ii„..,... .. ._„,„,....„„r„,.... • r,..•.•r 1111111 0011111111111/1111111.1 111111110111101) 11111111111 lir"' --.' 4111Y3'111111 E-111111 -111111,4:-.:-::-Allitii 2'' "11,,,.'jj:-' . linalliellir12:!,. ;ea EZA11... li. 1..-I:.. * .' • = I IP . 111111111111L=Yitir— z. • •..ar NI '11.-111•11:. ... •111111` fr• a sisEre-T.i* AILIII IL- 1311- igi..91 !, , _At& ki-..,Ir. ,us:-.. 11111111:11;-7 , 1:-1,11;i:111.1:11111i:: ill% li 1- 1 1111ramos- •Ilimillull11111:U; ' '''111111'n1116, 111111Zirw:IINI•1431INI'LIT.II,. MIIII.- RINI,. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPJ 1""if.111111Milir~ ; N. InahroL- 11111111111111111I111:2'.:: r' -,',-.i. ,illk '.1411R11 i 4, • -, -, ' . - - .4 : 6.' 1111111111ININNIIIIIII 1 41111L:tE' , 0111111311•11,1'211111T 2 . . 1111:MITElli 41711:4:51■11117' .1 111111 Milli=1 : !c- oNt161111•••••• ' MI- •-•filTrirr',iv,'- slitImisrie.: n:■,-IF iiitmiareAal. imilso: :in Etopi:12siiimirialoro,-;,10...,:t + ; 11111VIIIMIg-411 INLI•1111111r.O. IMIIIIIirAt'ir: - ll: 11:.1.,,.....1:71 1§11111111114,111.1.11/Ilkii, •-1:1; Ir. '..1111111l1■11,21111/11111111'41 : : IBIE:111:Lt.:.':.rrt/1:1111/II..':IIIIIIIMMIFINIIIIr-AINErA.- avimmt:,-rrierir ing"shaL 1•Namilisrlum ■,.:* . , _ , I a 1111 - zit 11114:1111111:11_ 11::11.--bArm. Illimilivinicomil• ''' ' 11111:11111/1 .anilimik.',lik...^mmilmosici:a- L ,•-• _ :::::::::nriaril:i." ••:(14::11111111111a....,i, , 1111111:11F-`,P.111:,::11;1' 111111111111 MIMI. -.1. ,A ..I •• : -I 1'1 ri..11111 ,•11.11.111.111 JIM Ininvolur. umnirre•ii'lliLaTIMIIIII ,• 11i NM E. : z VIII:ILIII■ 1: ' Tram liiminswallumz: Imaur. .-., r ;. ..la --alimiamr is t 1(4111111`;':'Li. -` -VI. :1111n/21-11; 11:1111r-4.21:;II' - 'Ili- : . :11111111.F.'--. 1111:4:1111;111: • Or :: 1111111F--"- II II;Mina:11-' • In-.' ill LIIIL I'. 111.1111111111101:1 I' 1111117 : mimmuall- tum, • ,-_lir ----. 1 Mils NNNNN' -..111 IL'11111, MIL,7,111111111.1•11 .INI.::.1 • 11.0111111: Z.:141RJ . 111111.11:111111,1, si'lliNitil ...1111111111111111111_ 'ILIUM SG 111111VM.2"4 rir /11111111r 1.11.11MIII!.. '1 III: VI ei - __•I -IF Ira.' 1 g . iliNIUNIV •:J1111i-. riwurriiis ai W ar.cm..,:a• a.... Slig Aorirell•se Pasoluelba 010.1.14. • : p 1 .i :4-5 ,...t:ir-. NE Affb•Ituni Issas d Loa WIWIN•WW• RN: Ilir;';...'f... i..".:I-L" Ilk• ■■■-: •.•' - ...:N111, ::-.11 - aosiumill1111114 . 2 ..11111:r'car! • •.,111111•••1111111011•, -I'' --4..■4 AGRICULTURAL LANDS OF LONG TERM =',:,...7=..,........„,....,. MSC!NNN;m 1111il *RN isms• ' 'PI COMMERCIAL SIGNIFICANCE 8••■•••Swalr WM HASTORN MFFIRSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SIM . NW WINN•••••MUNN sw•— ••• a• ..........=:—......"--467:==*—"1"-"''' ...............,............r.,..z....=,......... ICI r • a • ... I RANGE II N I RANGE 01 N 01 E Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-27 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES POLICIES: NRP 9.1 Regulate mining operations to prevent adverse impacts to ground or surface water quality. NRP 9.2 Establish a preference for the protection of aquifers and recharge zones from the effects of surface mining in the event that adverse impacts cannot be avoided through best management practices. AGRICULTURE LANDS GOAL NRG 10.0 Conserve and protect the agricultural land base and its associated lifestyle. POLICIES: NRP 10.1 Adopt a final Agricultural Lands Ordinance that includes the criteria from the Interim Agricultural Lands Ordinance for classifying and designating Agricultural Lands for long- term commercial significance based on the class of agricultural land,the size of the parcel,the tax status,current use,and distance from populated areas. NRP 10.2 Minimize conflicts with agricultural activities by developing site and design requirements for land use activities adjacent to designated agricultural land. NRP 10.3 Support the conservation of agricultural land through tax incentive programs,the purchase or transfer of development rights,and other methods developed in cooperation with agricultural landowners and managers. NRP 10.4 Coordinate with state and federal agencies to encourage conservation of productive agricultural land through best management practices, including soil and water conservation, drainage,and livestock waste management programs. NRP 10.5 Support the continuation of farming as the primary use of Agricultural Lands by allowing a maximum base density of one dwelling unit per twenty(20)acres. NRP 10.6 Encourage clustering based upon the characteristics of various types of agricultural areas and practices in the County,while preserving an overall base density on Agricultural Lands that • does not exceed one dwelling unit per twenty(20)acres. NRP 10.7 Prohibit the extension of service areas of utility local improvement districts,fire districts,or sewer,water,or public utility districts into designated Agricultural Lands. NRP 10.8 Support agricultural activities such as farmers' markets and roadside stands by permitting these uses outright in rural and agricultural areas. NRP 10.9 Encourage the preservation of family owned farms by discouraging the conversion of these lands to other uses. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-38 August 28,1998 NATURAL RESOURCES NRP 10.10 Support the work of Washington State University Cooperative Extension for technical and marketing assistance for small-scale commercial farmers. AQUACULTURE RESOURCES GOAL: NRG 11.0 Conserve and protect aquaculture lands and associated facilities in order to ensure a long-term commercial and recreational resource base. POLICIES: NRP 11.1 Establish criteria for designating commercial shellfish beds of long-term commercial significance. NRP 11.2 Encourage the conservation of aquaculture lands through the designation of long team commercially significant lands, tax incentive programs and the regulation of adjacent land uses. NRP 11.3 Minimize conflicts with adjacent land uses to protect continued productive aquaculture activities in marine waters associated with fish hatcheries and shellfish habitat NRP 11.4 Address the cumulative impacts of land use activities on or adjacent to shellfish habitat through the Shoreline Management Master Program,Comprehensive Plan amendments,and County land use ordinances. NRP 11.5 Minimize adverse impacts on the quantity and quality of water resources by encouraging land based-and marine aquaculture operations to utilize best management practices. NRP 11.6 Net pens, which are not designated resource lands, shall be regulated under the Shoreline Management Master Program under regulations for aquaculture activities. Such regulations will be updated during the SMMP revision for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan will then be amended to incorporate the SMMP as an element of the Comprehensive Plan. Until the revised SMMP is adopted,where a regulatory provision is inconsistent with other County ordinances,the more restrictive provision shall apply. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-39 August 28,1998 mL o3— IS)-2, 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY —'` 1°a v A 01 \ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 621 Sheridan Street•Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450•800/831-2678•360/379-4451 Fax www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment . Master Land Use Permit Application Form APR 8 PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number: 1 ® ® 0 E ® ® Y1 ® Subdivision Name: Lot Number: f 1 Property Size: Si 3i, -/square feet) Existing Use of Property: 440 011 ,_rf r to( r/1 Site Address and/or Directions to Property: from r c on 1414' /J% 74/w ��� c J, "'e / c�� 4). 4er fosp 1vrn k#o4hi iaer/W4eA'l /god,guild)' 9X) ''o4 /104' APPLICANT&OWNER/INFORMATION / ) L _ Applicant(if applicable): ll�O AWf � o/o(h p�/G�1!/1 //'A Telephoner o)38r 4 9y$ Address: -75/ OA She City: ljl/ 7:I1 fit . Std-: n/14 Zip Code: f 36 Email Address�!//d/11� SLItalt �/�I/� Q r Applicant's Signature: AITI Itid" Property Owner(s)of Record: 01 I j $ 4 ii(ii �1 I e hone 3, !lp +i3S2. Address: T SH/I r Ye) 6, if- rof f-, ..-- '`... City: State: Zip Code: Email Address I acknowledge that the appli nt above is a•plyin• for a building permit on my property. ./j / Owner's Signature: „,kj„ . 'd,t �/ I I hereby designate I'I/ 1 r ., to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s) j I 0 ,--- (PROPERTY 0' ER IGNATURF) f _ (DATE) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as nece sary) ', ' j I P Pe, , / •ov' ,, if'r4 ar, '1-P,� / iscii1 '4 0 / �/ • , , i :ffi i m ; : i/ .► 1 � r o A o '/ , he71 A w'W13 d i i N/ kir -t r 'pr°piivi d et w c®ydS. [THIS SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY] Refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements. An asterisk (*) indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire may be required. Type I Permits Refer to: ❑ Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System(EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC Lj Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 Li Allowed"Yes" Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment" UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 if, Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 ''..t. ❑ Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)" UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 (OVER) \\\ MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.02/25/2002 ■ A • Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2 and Table 3-1 El Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat, Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 ❑ Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)" Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional(Discretionary)"C(d)" Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) ❑ Variance, Minor* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence ❑ Appeal UDC Section 8.4.2 SEPA 8.10.12(b) Type III Permits ❑ Conditional"C" Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat, Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13(must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) ❑ Variance, Major* UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development, Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 ❑ Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 El Appeal UDC Section 8.4.3 SEPA 8.10.12(c) Type IV Permits El Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 -, ❑ PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.13 Type V Permits ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 APR "' 8 2003 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 Amendment* ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 ❑ Appeal of SEPA UDC Section 8.10.12(d) Other Local,State or Federal Permits CI Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [PLEASE NOTE THAT TWO SIGNATURES ARE REQUIRED] By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrators representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations.Access and right of entry to the applicant's roily I be re sted and shall occur only during regular business hours. 1. 0//0a (PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act" or "ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual. group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Ap ant h s r this di laimer and signs and dates it below. ^ 2. VA/(U (PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) MASTER LAND USE PERMIT DOC REV 02/25/2002 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable:Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Rezone Request 2. Name of applicant:Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding(NWSWB) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:251 Otto Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Contact:Bill Brock Phone:(360)385-4948 4. Date checklist prepared:3-21-2003 5. Agency requesting checklist:Jefferson County Department of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Agency will complete determination within the year. The NWSWB will begin initial construction on the currently zoned commercial section of the property as early as the end of this year. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes,the total build-out on this property will be several years from now.The final campus plan cannot be finalized until this proposal is resolved.A five-acre campus will have a totally different look than a two-acre campus. In the five-acre campus,a public parking lot for boat trailers will be included.This public facility would help reduce future traffic congestion in this waterfront area. The five-acre campus also allows for a more attractive campus layout and room for any future expansions.Immediate plans(within the next year)are to construct one hard building and erect two material covered shelters on the current commercial section of the property. This would allow the NWSWB to move from its current location to this interim campus. Ar - L ran 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Draft Environmental Impact statement was finalized March 17,2001 for this subject property and the NWSWBs waterfront properties by Western Washington University,Huxley College of Environmental Studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No approvals are pending concerning the subject property. The NWSWB just completed a Pre-Application Conference with the Jefferson County Department of Community Development for initial construction of buildings on the commercially zoned section of this property as well as future plans for the waterfront properties.The NWSWB plans to continue activity related to that Pre-Application. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. For this amendment proposal no other approvals are required. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)The NWSWBs proposal to have the entire five-acre property zoned commercial lies in the desire for enough space to ultimately build the campus as shown in Exhibit B. This Maximum Campus Plan includes some 12 buildings totaling around 38,000 sq. ft. These buildings will allow space for wood and metal shops, lumber and boat storage, administration, lunchroom, multiple classrooms, library and even a student hostel. This Maximum Campus Plan is sized for a total of approximately 88 people during the nine month Associate Degree program. This Maximum Campus Plan also includes a.7-acre public parking lot for boat trailers that use the Port of Port Townsend boat launch. A Public Access Trail will be included in either the five-acre or two acre campus that will connect the center of Port Hadlock with the waterfront. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See Exhibit A, the subject property is located in section 1,T29N,R1W B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other .Flat terraces separated with steep slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?Slopes are 211: 1V to 13/411: 1V;30% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty fine to coarse sand with gravel to sandy fine to coarse sand with cobbles to 3 inches.Soils are over consolidated and dense. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.The site has been previously graded by excavation as a borrow pit that has created three fairly level pads.There are no visible signs of land sliding or major soil movements. APR - 8 2003 2 e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.No filling is anticipated at this time.There is the planned removal of some 4,000 cubic yards of gravel to widen the second terrace(within the current commercial zoned area). f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Some surficial raveling over time may occur.No significant erosion from runoff expected due to the porous nature of the site. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)?28-30% + h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any:Any measures required through the permitting process will be employed. A storm water plan will be developed for future property construction. a. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.During construction some dust and equipment emissions will occur,but not of any lasting significance.The use of boat construction materials such as turpentine,paints,epoxy,varnish,linseed oil,etc,will be properly stored and used as they currently are at the NWSWB. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.Not to our knowledge c Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any:Any wood dusts created during boat construction would be contained to the boat shops.Any boat finishing emissions are minor compared to the area in question. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into.A lagoon that empties into Port Townsend Bay is to the east. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans.Part of the lowest terrace on the property comes within 200 feet,but verbal discussions with the Washington State DOE and Fish and Wildlife indicate little concern over our plans. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.Not applicable. 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general APR - $ 2003 description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan.No 3 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.Not over and above normal rainwater discharges. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No in both cases. 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals. . . ;agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve.Discharges into the ground will be domestic sewage only. Closed metal collection containers are used routinely to collect brush cleaning solvents and other excess fluids.These containers are disposed of at a hazardous collection facility.A sewage system (drain field and treatment tanks)has already been permitted with the Jefferson County Health Department.For this site the construction of initial holding tanks and connection lines is all that is needed. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe.The Maximum Campus Plan would contain two holding basins for surface runoff(Exhibit B).This is in a conceptual stage and will require a finalized storm water plan before permitting. 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. It is possible that accidental spills of solvents could occur,but the amount used at any one time is usually small. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any:Holding basins will probably be used to contain surface runoff impacts. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: —�—deciduous tree:tle 11 aple aspen,other(madrona,willow) X evergreen tree:(:),i� as)pine,other shrubs grass APR - 8 2003 pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?Vegetation in the gravel pit consists of a considerable number of non-native species,many of which are invasive weeds. 4 APR - 8 2003 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.None known d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any:There is no landscaping plan at this time,as the final campus layout is in question. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds:e aw ,eagle ongbir ,other: mamma s: bear,e ,beaver,other: fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. In the vicinity; bald eagle, marbled murrelet c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.Migrating birds and bats in the proximate area d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This property will be vegetated with a mix of thickets and open areas. Native vegetation will be left intact and provide habitat for birds, insects, reptiles,and small mammals.Non-native vegetation will be removed. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc.Final plans have not been developed but it is anticipated that the heating source for those buildings that require heat(current boat construction shops are not heated)will be electric, propane or fuel oil. Electricity will be run to all buildings for lighting and power tools. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe.No,this property is a minimum of 30 feet below most of adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any:Do not know at this time. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe.The following is wording taken from the mentioned Draft Environmental Impact Statement..."The processes that will be conducted at the site are minimal in regards to environmental hazards.It does not qualify as an industrial facility according to the Code of Federal Regulations.There will exist a chance of spills during storage and use of paints and varnishes but likely hood is minimal. Particulate and nuisance dust from saw dust waste exists.There will be some exposure to fiberglass and an epoxy resin but its use is required in an estimated 1 in 6 boats.There should be extreme caution in the use of Oxalic acid,which is used for wood bleaching operations." 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services over that currently available is anticipated,however,final permitting will allow for comment by emergency services, 5 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Flammable material storage lockers and on-site Material Safety Data Sheets; proper registration of all HAZMAT. Saw cut waste is recycled by students as firewood,project pieces,and the dust is used in garden paths and for animal bedding. Excess saw dust is sent to the County composting facility. Old paints, varnish,etc are taken to the local HAZMAT facility. b. Noise APR - 82003 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)?Nothing to affect this project. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a - short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation,other)?Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site.Noise created by this project will be from traffic for the transportation of materials,removal of waste materials,and grading.There will be normal construction noises related to the new building.Normal noise activity related to school operations will come from electrical equipment used in the making of wooden boats and regular traffic from students and staff.The hours of normal school operation are from 8:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any:No extraordinary measures are planned at this time,as the final campus plan is unknown.Electrical power tools will be housed within hard buildings in the final campus build out. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?The site is currently an abandoned gravel pit.The only building on the property is a rental mobile home on the uppermost terrace(see Exhibit C). Adjacent property uses include residential on the northwest and west,the Ajax Café on the northeast,a county road on the east,and the Kivley Center commercial development on the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe.Not to our knowledge c. Describe any structures on the site.A rental mobile home exists on the upper most terrace on the northwest part of this property(see Exhibit C). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what?Not initially,it is anticipated that the mobile home will be removed when and if the NWSWB builds a student hostel. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?The site currently is split between a Rural Village Center-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?Split RVC and Rural Residential 1:5 g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?In the Maximum Campus Plan there would be 88 people working at the site.The student hostel can house a maximum of 24 individuals during our summer workshops and will have its own septic system.It is possible that the 6 hostel would be used during our nine-month program,but would likely house considerably less individuals than for shorter summer courses. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?One to two k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any:None anticipated at this time. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any A vocational school use is conditionally allowed under UDC Table 3-1 in a Rural Village Center.The conditional permitting process will allow for public comment. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,mid- dle,or low-income housing.The student hostel would house a maximum of 24 individuals during our summer workshops.The nine-month program would house considerably less. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing.One mobile home c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any:Space limitations will limit the area available for housing. The first priority for space will be construction of those buildings necessary for general operations of the NWSWB. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed?The tallest building planned at this conceptual stage is 34 feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?This property lies in a combination natural/man-made hollow that is at lest 30 feet below the Port Hadlock street level.It is anticipated that no obstruction of views will occur. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:The proposed public access trail and its accompanying view areas will increase opportunities for the public to enjoy the existing views. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?There will be some security lights on around the campus during the night,final plan unknown at this time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?Very unlikely that the project will create a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:None anticipated at this time. 12. Recreation 7 APR - 8 2003 a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?There are water- oriented activities available just down the road from this property.The Port of Port Townsend has a public boat launching ramp and a public dock.The NWSWB will be adding opportunities for the general public with its waterfront property plans.The property in question will add facilities for adult public education and public meetings. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe.No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any:This property will provide a public access foot trail from Port Hadlock down to Lower Hadlock Road.The applicant will provide additional public access to a dock(for viewing and picnics),down a proposed gangway to a floating dock and a public mooring field.These facilities will provide more opportunities for water-oriented activities. 13. Historic and cultural preservation r a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for national,state,or local preser- vation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe.The Ajax Cafe,on an adjacent property,is listed on the national register under its original name"Galster House". b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.Down the hill from this site and on the beach is a site op referred to as"Tsetsibus".This was a gathering area for tribes to get together for potlatches. Chemakums lived in this vicinity before but became virtually extinct. cc c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any:Contact has already been made with the Washington State Office of Archaeology&Historic Preservation concerning the overall plan. The NWSWB has sent a letter to the Tsetsibus Heritage Council seeking their involvement,but there has been no reply to date. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site (see Exhibit Aa) will be from Lower Hadlock Road(County)and then up to where it connects with State Route 116(Oak Bay Road/Ness Corner Road). b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?The site is not currently being served by Jefferson County Transit.The nearest transit stop is approximately 1/z mile from the site at the intersection of Chimacum Road and Ness Corner Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?There are 48 parking spaces in the main parking area and an additional 11 shown for the student hostel area.The five-acre build out also contains public boat trailer parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private).Initial verbal discussions with Washington State DOT involving the Maximum Campus Plan (approx.88 people),indicated that no traffic study would be necessary at the intersection of Lower Hadlock Road and Oak Bay Road.The current traffic load on Oak Bay Road would require our proposal to be adding close to 200 left turns onto Lower Hadlock Road at peak time to trigger a traffic study.Verbal discussions with Jefferson County Public Works have been centered on our first phase of 8 development in which we will have from 50-60 students and staff at the site.Under those circumstances, no traffic studies would be necessary and no significant improvements to the road will be necessary. Also included in these assumptions is the continued presence of a Public Access Trail from Port Hadlock to the waterfront to mitigate lunchtime vehicular trips and to provide a safer pedestrian walkway. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transporta- tion? If so,generally describe.No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur.With a Maximum Campus Plan of 88 persons and using a worst rose scenario(all drive,one person per vehicle,students in hostel drive to campus,all drive to lunch and back)generates total vehicular trips in a day of 352. Based on recent student levels and staffing,when the NWSWB actually moves to this proposed site the real impact will be more like 50-60 people with a worst case scenario of 240 total vehicular trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The public access trail will help mitigate total vehicular trips to the campus area and provide pedestrian access for the general public from Port Hadlock to the waterfront. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire pro- tection,police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe.The NWSWB move to this site would transfer the responsibility from one part of Jefferson County to another.No new need or service is expected. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any.Nothing suggested at this time. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at I- site: -411111,D atural gas wat , efuse - ice, le hone sanitary sewer, .1,1gfflar,other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new or additional utilities over that which can be hooked up or started with existing vendors will be required. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: APO - 8 2003 9 • JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street- Port Townsend-Washington 98368 360/379-4450-800/831-2678-360/379-4451 Fax Application for Formal Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment' MLA# PROJ ECT/APPLI CANT NAME: Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Rezone Request Ili Applications must be completed and submitted to the Department of Community development by May 1 of the current calendar year in order to be considered during this year's amendment process. Please note that, beginning in 2004, the application submittal deadline will be February I of each calendar year. Completed applications that are received after May I will be placed on the docket for the following calendar year. Applications that are incomplete (i.e., that do not include all of the information required below) will be returned to the applicant. Submittal Requirements 1. A completed Master Land Use Application and SEPA Checklist(if applicable). Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2. A completed and signed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist. 3. Comprehensive Plan/UDC Amendment application fee(as applicable),as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance,as amended. 4. Any additional information deemed necessary by the Administrator to evaluate the proposed amendment. 5. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit A,"a vicinity map showing the following: a. The location of the area proposed to be redesignated; b. The land use designation of all property within five hundred(500)feet of the site;and c The uses of all properties located within five hundred(500)feet of the site. 6. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit B,"a description of the proposed Plan/UDC amendment and any associated development proposal(s), if applicable.Applications for project-related formal site-specific redesignations must include plans,and information or studies accurately depicting existing and proposed uses and improvements. Applications for such redesignations that do not specify proposed uses and potential impacts are assumed to have maximum impact to the environment and public facilities and services. 7. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit"C,"a map that depicts existing conditions on the site and within the general vicinity[i.e.,within a three hundred(300)-foot radius].The exhibit must depict topography,wetlands and buffers, easements and their purpose, and means of access to the site.The intent of the exhibit is to clearly illustrate the physical opportunities and constraints of the site. 8. Please provide an explanation of why the amendment is being proposed. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) The NWSWB seeks to have the entire subject property zoned Rural Village Center-Commercial.Currently the property has a split zoning of RVC-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5.The split zoning seriously limits the NWSWB in its plans for developing a new campus on this property.The UDC allows conditional development of an adult/technical school(private)on Rural Village Center-Commercial but not on Rural Residential 1:5. See UDC Section 9.4. SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.2/25/2003 Page 1 1 APR - 8 2003 9. The current land use designation/zoning of the site is:Split zoning,Rural Village Center-Commercial and Rural Residential 1:5 10. The proposed land use designation/zoning of the site is:Total property would be Rural Village Center-Commercial 11. The current use of the site is:Abandoned gravel pit 12. The proposed use of the site is: Future site of the Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuildings main campus 13. If changes to Comprehensive Plan or UDC text are required,please prepare and label as"Exhibit D,"proposed amendatory language(i.e.,to affected text of both the Comprehensive Plan and UDC)shown in"bill"format,with text to be added indicated with underlining(e.g., underlinging and text to be deleted indicated with strikeouts(e.g., Not applicable 14. Please prepare and label as"Exhibit E,"a thorough explanation of how the proposed redesignation/rezone and associated development proposals, if any, meet,conflict with,or relate to the following inquiries: a. Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? b.Are the assumptions that form the basis for the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan no longer valid, or has new information become available that was not considered during the process of adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan or any subsequent amendment? C.How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? d. Does the proposal meet concurrency requirements for transportation? e. Does the proposal adversely affect adopted level of service standards for public facilities and services other than transportation(e.g.,sheriff,fire and emergency medical services,parks,fire flow,and general governmental services)? f. Is the proposal consistent with the goals,policies and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? 9.Will the proposal result in probable significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network,capital facilities, utilities, parks,and environmental features that cannot be mitigated? h.Will the proposal place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities? i. How is the subject parcel(s)physically suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development including,but not limited to the following: (i) Access; (ii) Provision of utilities;and (iii) Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses? j.Will the proposal, if adopted,create a pressure to change the land use designation of other properties?If the answer is yes, how would such change of land use designation on other properties be in the long-term best interests of the county as a whole? k. Does the proposed site-specific amendment materially affect the land use and population growth projections that are the bases of the Comprehensive Plan? I. If the proposed redesignation/rezone is located within an unincorporated urban growth area(UGA),would the proposal materially affect the adequacy or availability of urban facilities and services to the immediate areas and the overall UGA? SITE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.2/25/2003 Page 2 • APR - 8 2003 m. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW),the Countywide Plannina Policy for Jefferson C, and other applicable inter jurisdictional policies or agreements, and any other local, state or federal laws? 15. The applicant hereby certifies that the statements contained in this application are true and provide an accurate representation of the proposed amendment,and the applicant(s)hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE 0:8 O:21,4 DATE 3/p/0 3 f i / / PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE / ,' 4 I( I DATE 3 l 0 3 4 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE ' / DATE j r 5 1- b 3 PROPERTY OWNER S SIGNATURE DATE [NOTE: For all required signatures,representative authorization is required if application is ndt signed by the owner.] WE SPECIFIC APP.DOC REV.212812403 Page 3 ... .. _. _.. ._.. ___ "1 APR - 8 2003 . Exh ; b i+ Aa 0. p�q� O _ p t�� p V [ i p}� 2 / O °x {I� U u ky S ra. U Z I k � i { Kw H <°0. o u�0. W L kN Luw U�'"0-a' 5 x pr(4,7,x0 m ,ozo 6om (o.0 {e.... K 77� z ti,'- �,.. �NOVj�f� <° < F�j'GR�°,S°'v",i {�°xLq�K O Py. fn '7 F. < U W OV wz P SO EY' k' i- <N JZU X KPNP.-1 iC OR WU I ! 4 moVVz G Y0,w, =oz Oz. „ Va N^zamm 0.P.m-1 zit mN mo<_ XKFO =Z 2,,, WW 1< <W wU P.W°Y .1 m0 <7 <_ ':"- pG. «O ,nN p, ExPW m '., ..7 N O F^U z m.-.�.<NU O1wz 0. PY-x{` F7<O.�P �j2 Y.Of.' F ..1 ®K�• G.M ! CO" < t ili< ... U< U k. .,..., v >.ao3af=o zc�c..Nxxx<a N>1-xaxt..3mt•NZF UUUa11=CO .N4-P.= (DO MmP W.-� --N7♦Otl 0 O. NC.I ntll`tl RO-•N 7r 001,000.-., N0.00.-000-.NO .W O t�0WO•.N h.•I Y0 NNNNN NNocvoi pon OCOON .+. V ♦r•, .VYOtlh Imo` ♦ 1` vt `< It n't' es• V) b�\6\ ► 401,� �`�4 • iitimo' IOW yr , of s` ` ,„ql 4., • 111. . 1 z Vt*:, , :.,..* . 1 101111' 10 Ng . 6 0 akS ‘ C4 t= '�.aattgAt 09.111 4\ ( � Ssad V a et Nuro A]nuH NW • W ��'� 01411 °°ee'�°° `r1 a e o z a ee ee a ©�, ,�� c:„ , f� , X L., -‹ v \ ' 1-041 ik ,z474 i ��\, F___. ..-:: ._, / _ ,, ,--,- Alir y -TN ■14OSV1 a • MI,., , it,ra I i , c :4Ali z f 4 f / �y� " -1' 0.2 1p„. ii. d- — 0 8 I a 1xl P mil' ��a�'� _ _i� �� / �� may' •. s 1\”1� —' t �\'\ ' y ° 'c Jnaaui k :IOC::.,•�_-� ���� waro�OC _ 1 a t.�� - _ _ U ! 1 • t la o - am • It 41144.1 ; i 1 crmcO.a - ��•\�\ f MO MIIMON - -_ )cflcrson County Comprehensive Plan 3-36 APR - 8 2003 August 28, I98 c )44. -1'111 E )ch iipiii- A I) ,, c:) c0 c. u to ci.., —.z I. .‘. v cm 4.,--s. .4' 0 U. Q‘ . '.1"•-• ti) v Nr-...., to ft ....._ , - ..... , - ., --- . , , .... .. ... , . _. , . :0 ' i i === , ;„ , -,,,, tt ---' —;''' i — oh .• IF """ ?=,:,=': /, ' •,. - . =Nk '''"k+-4,..:-,. ,""+:+r„,,,,;--, , ' ` ---- ' -""---,,,,,24-41,r47:- ' ' ' n 0° r:) lir% -, - ', - '' -',' ‘''' : ',' ""%,otiiv''',1*417•*++,..,,,.,„,„,, , ,,,,_„0.,'-;.,-`,-, f.).,,,',-,v' - - -.... ,q . i 1 -1- ... "6 " — I r 1 ^i-• 8 ' 1 1 - --I- a4 ' ..." 8 x .j.,;..6 • s 51 '+.-'-':- 8 ./:`, - v. 2, 7f) Q- Ct. - o ' • ;..-'4,,,, , ,...4 7z,-, -./) • * c"' „ ,, ,-,-,-,... ',, ....,,e,s, i -/,',.•-- -) =,;--,.; -6 ,',;-,%-/ " --',f- ■r..- '., Z', , CJ ' ' •- •.`.■.<';',A//:;:,,,, 3 ,''',/fX:',..7,,,„...'",:k;-./.:" „. .- "- -..2/ .g .-- rf") - ';51' d: ‹,5 s-'s , :;,'.1, ` . 7-_, 4 'Va!' .,..,hf...°,,',/ .., ,-- „,;,, F.:P-1" .d _ .. . . ..7...... .... .„:„..,... _ . ., .3., . ,,,,,„ "-- ' ..,,,./,,,z--„,';'";:--.4::,oil..1,,-%;,'"-7 , t lg ,,_ci s..- ..,•,,,,,,,.,-.2',:f,';:',".3;:c4,.: ..,„' `;',"' ,''',!;-, 1.--...`'''..'4,c.':;":',:*2-1,';'-'''' P c7,' -:, , ,,,'-'.-- ..1 .'r,1,..-; 9k ??.;!,.:',7' .9 '.^.- -:.-:';',;': Y- ,;;;.`..:.. ''.;,"',..;".//'''',.::';.(;,.,.. .';' I ,4, 'V ziP ''..:-''..-; "' - 8--, - :":'',,...'" 8 ' : '/;,,,,,- '::-_- i ,;'' /' —_ ''''' t''iii . '','. 4 ---- i $,','''-- , I : , _ / ,. 1 '''' <c. ' ' '''' it5) - ' - , ''' 8 '''' 8 i k cyll' zr, .9. ,-s ..o ./.1 ' I ''''' '-.,/, ,.: .'', '•g 8 1 lit 1 t_j_* ,,....----''''' , ‘ :,,,,,,' '''',"----0. 8--,.. 8 '' ‘. -'7'. < * .?5 '.,-- : :i"1 :.P'' clf- h,. '''3. 4.'7.-S',,''''':-'0.4;',;?: 40 F•=':: _ r /1'..,:*.. .- 4.-.` 4-' '-,-.,'''1 .'-. ' 8,,,,,,•-"tif,' '8".='1.r'',,,,,&-= . -..-0, -, ; ;7, ,..,,,. ,,,i,f.,,,;:',,-,, _,,,,, ...., ,-t, -,.,8==',44. ,,,;,..„,,..,fr-,:,,,-.„7:4,/,,,$),*',61,..,-,..-: - -'' .- , '',.., ,-,e :_-, -. -=•' '4 / _J--- rve"., 1.0'-•"„r'' n ''''''7-''',' '-r -'rA..- — 416''., ''', ," '''''‘;'-, .14.p<1,l'' ' c'-' 'Z', -,/,..,-,a. ..•:.',.:/$,..,.i, "0-1 ' 3 ,,,,,,i1).,,,, ''''',7.,,,4 41,-,,,-„2 ,,,,,,A, .',...1., .... —., ' 1--.1: , ,z,*i.-?:,t,-:,7„"s,,1,,i%"A'fP,6%,*,$.:A,,'?.,t`;0..e,,,4.,4.,‘...,4'.,r.e,-7..,7k.,#.,,..,.•„-;,',t'4...,i`-,,-3.#"Z,'.t:*,.-%.„;,„.•,4i.,.,,:,°/4o 1‘-..."4l,O 8-1".4..,.".,l.A.,':.,p4.:,,-;,,',.,:'.i.44'z.''''P',,:.;,'',;ee'r,,i1.'--I,x,,,','A',„,',,'-,':.,':1x,'.t,,l,4.`o,'4.:,',;.,"--Q--.-%.--";:.e.,_:),,.7-•_,-•=1.".,<.'1,..,,.,.'-,,:,.„..,,','. 'f aa4':0'='t<'*4-,'-,',,.,t',.".,e„:,.:.!,.'„,.',-,,--4V 4c,--7,!--44',7,',,r,.,-l'-:',4,.:!„',-',,,,'.,-,,',°'.,,,,f,',(•-'-”,/,-'",.',.'._.,o8 1-„,‘'-'i ip"'.-,4 p,,',,,,`e o'''<,'.--4-1e'`–'k.'.,,,I'...:.-,'I:,,.,,:,1°V,8 8 4-.A.,,.;.',,,,,',"..i-' :-j•;,t r 1,2 8-_.1 1 ..,6,-'.;.--..-.;",. .k.,..:/7,;.,.t pp If ;;j ,_ 1 CcCCc=C 1 rO p) - -- •, .'_4-ry--,,-_—,.)_- 1 Gd 11VH 0 INOSVIN -„,,, '--;",.-',-.,.. ....-„,. . .4 , .-- ..., 1 ...., ...." - ! I \ I \\ NI ' 4 ExI, ibjvi- AC Q -, 08040044,_ 080400104 Q C8040 603 1 989400401 III 09@4C0406 �„ ifi 989400102 68894OD7 o000C0aG0 ' X989400102 989400601 , ' 9e94no408 98940040E '. ..., 989400,13 6,80400605 989400004 6o1C24C3s ``,, 080400101 it-06 000000250 / 00000O220 S. 9 40r)40a 901024018 CJ 961 024CE43 901013005 a ' 9o,o,3a,s :1101 sle `' '10 0 e" 00i 0130i5 I)c)�S `''M( all flavePS iy 90,024038 plot . 901013016 0 001024081) ' C 90,0,Mau i, \ F 1 c 901013014 s�°1/°'"v ;' aa,o, a,3 901024035 901013012 ."' 6roo-Pro4. 00102,u)47 S!ry. 901013001 A ,, 941024057 971000001 901013006 Maps provided ty.kfferon Coun{yG18 al : I ka APR - 82003 http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/output/parcels outside GISSERVER142416808764.jpg 3/10/03 EXHIBIT B Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Description of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment This proposal is a request to rezone a 5.36 acre property from a split designation (Rural Village Center and Rural Residential 1:5)to a single zoning designation of Rural Village Center. This property(tax parcel 901013016) is an abandoned gravel pit that is owned by John T. Shold, Samuel Swanson and Sterling &Sally Huntingford. The NWSWB has an option to purchase this property. The Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding (NWSWB) is a non-profit private institution that would like to move from its current location in Glen Cove to its planned main campus on this 5- acre property. The current split zoning allows about half of this property for campus development per UDC Table 3-1. Under that table a College or Technical School/Adult Education Facility(not state owned) is not allowed in a Rural Residential 1:5 zone. The NWSWB would like to have the entire property for development so that a sensible, expandable and aesthetically pleasing campus can be designed. The NWSWB requested an Un-named Institutional Uses designation for its Heritage Campus activities in 2002, but was rejected by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. This proposed amendment is a further effort to remedy our inability to use the entire property as an adult education facility. The Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding has been developing its Port Had lock Heritage Campus concept for the last two years. This campus concept includes two properties on the waterfront that are currently owned by the NWSWB. One of the buildings has been repaired and is being used for summer and winter classes not associated with our nine-month associate degree program. The other building is being repaired at this time and is planned to be functional this summer. It will include a large classroom and shop areas. The NWSWB has received a Washington State Heritage Grant that was used to repair one of the waterfront properties and a Washington State DOE Planning Grant that was used to design a Public Access Trail from the Port Hadlock street level, down and around the perimeter of the property in question, down the County easement on Lower Hadlock Road and finally out onto the currently existing NWSWB dock. We recently received a grant from the Washington State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) that will provide partial funding for construction in 2004 of a public mooring field, floating dock and gangway. The Exhibit B Plan shows the main elements of the Heritage Campus concept. This Maximum Campus Plan scenario includes some 12 buildings totaling 38,000 sq. ft. and is sized for student and staff population of 88 individuals. This plan also includes a student hostel that would house as many as 24 students during the shorter summer classes and significantly less students during the nine-month program. This Maximum scenario includes future potential growth, but would not be our first build out. Our first campus would be sized for a total of 50-60 students and staff. Eliminating half of this property for development will significantly reduce our site design options. We believe our development at this site will not have a significant negative impact on County services, the environment, adjacent property owners or overall traffic. We will have an impact, but we believe that any negative factors will be overshadowed by positive impacts such as increased revenues to Port Hadlock businesses, increased public access to the beach and dock areas, increased meeting room facilities for community groups and building aesthetics that enhance the "early 20th century" feel of the waterfront. APR - 82003 • c,N ), ,p4ice)q .._0 /P01d CI X /�a� mm te. ' . i .< >. 3 o Ad/ , 'C:11 ' 414, .1 - oi. I �I✓ rE X q X —I/ 0 T rri (7 D ` (n cn z '� ��i. SyDA bd v) ri 1 act "� 3> P. erg 144,, .. d',/,,,,,),0 c3, Is ■ II 0 ri. /it • -4/10 i = __ •-•-.. • .,,,.,. ., ,41 ':%. 4 ,.. z 4..,-,%.,.., , 441: n ....4...„, ... 0. , .,,, , -3i,r*t ]> to ‘ ''"'4!'''in 1.441:f•',N. ----- 4* . . � Z D `, a C -I D� -0 i '`� \ d D ii �. y% o o D Al d -v Z £Z m D U m Ni • /1�u+ I— r. cjk , ,..0...e..,-. ‘ 0‘31k::1/2:.,., 1‹,, ,,i) , H S` .:',* 2::. 2 EI — cR \ rn - \\ nO. C q C D TI XI 0 Z xl O xi --I tTl N a -o n N 8 [ J O N h JA CI 1-1 IS *Ilk o— N 3yo 6R 5����� 3 z w �P� x k ¢ H Q y DO z3? IA 1 C O C O I 0 11)N4P1141111144141114111111414Na \. -...---...--- <.'.' '''.4' .1.4.' ''''..... 4110. +) 1111. P U W W 1 _ / IA G E� a �! owl- h O , U lid 4 o � MH�y� M r' = y X qP \ Y U N \ ./7 ?>b P,y0 cyl APR - 8 2003 EXHIBIT D Not applicable to this proposal APR - 8 2003 EXHIBIT E Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding Item 14 of the Application, explanation of the Rezone 14(a)The only substantial change since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan would be the recent 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle in which this property is in the proposed Tri-Area UGA. 14(b)We believe the assumptions that form the basis of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan are still valid. "The Comprehensive Plan is a living document and will change as circumstances, challenges and outside influences change" (pg. XI). We believe our specific request for a site-specific amendment is a change that fits well within the intent and design of the Comprehensive Plan. 14(c)We believe our request is consistent with several of the"basic principles" of the Comp Plan Vision Statement(pg. x). We help"support a healthy, diversified, and sustainable local and regional economy by recognizing existing local businesses...which are compatible with and complementary to the community". The NWSWB has been active in Jefferson County for over 20 years by providing skills to people working in the marine trades. The summer and fall students bring in outside dollars to the tune of between $1-2 million per year that is spent in the County for all manner of living and entertainment expenses. This proposal will help"reinforce and enhance the historic sense of'place' or'community' around traditional population centers" and "..the strengthening of local communities". This property adjoins the current commercial center of Port Hadlock, thus continuing development within a population center. The architectural style of proposed buildings on the site and the current NWSWB properties on the waterfront all will have a"historical"flavor that will be reminiscent of the early part of the 20th century. One of the stated Strategies is (pg. 7-17) "A. Adequate Land and Infrastructure for Economic Development". Under the Action Items for this are the following: 11. (pg.7-18) " Actively promote vocational training and educational opportunities that strengthen and increase the skills available in the local workforce." 12, (pg. 7-18) " Encourage educational outreach programs (WSU, Peninsula College, Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding, and private programs) designed to train people in recreational and tourist related activities, small scale entrepreneurship, and marine trades." The NWSWB has been teaching people for over 20 years both woodworking and boat building skills. We plan on continuing this core activity in the future and are looking at ways to increase the breath of our curriculum and its effectiveness. One example of this would be the recently initiated Community Woodworking Program that is targeted specifically for County residents. A few points from the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan that this proposal directly r addresses include the following: 1) Rural Commercial Land Use (pg. 3-68) LNG 4.2 "Encourage a variety of commercial, retail, professional, tourist-related, o community service...within the designated boundaries of Rural Village Centers at a scale appropriate to protect the rural character of the natural neighborhood." This proposal would allow the NWSWB to fully develop a campus that is in character and co proportion to the current Port Hadlock community and that supports the heritage of this area both in use and in design. • 2) Rural Commercial Land Use (pg. 3-70) LNG 4.6"Ensure visual compatibility of Rural Village Center commercial infill development with the surrounding rural area...shall be scaled and sized to preserve the natural character of the neighborhood."The proposed site is in a "topographic hollow" open to the waterfront and lower than the level of the Hadlock commercial center. This physical separation makes the proposed site more of a waterfront than an upland property. The period design of the buildings on this site will enhance the "waterfront character" of Lower Hadlock. 3) Transportation (pg. 3-87) LNP 17.1 "Encourage development and land use proposals that utilize existing transportation systems and provide non-motorized transportation opportunities." The NWSWB has plans to develop a Public Access Trail (initial design completed through a Washington State DOE Planning Grant)through this property and down to the waterfront, thus, encouraging public use and providing student access to the Port Hadlock businesses for lunches and temporary housing. The proximity of public transportation and this Trail will allow students to live in the area and commute via mass transit. A public easement has recently been granted to Jefferson County for the first leg of this trail between tlt two NWSWB waterfront buildings. 4) Education EDG. 2.0 (pg.7-11) "Encourage programs aimed at providing education,job training and retraining, and skills enhancement that are responsive to the changing needs of local businesses and residents." EDP 2.1 (pg. 7-11) "Support the expansion of adult education opportunities available to Jefferson County residents who seek vocational training and retraining, skills or knowledge enhancement..." The NWSWB provides an Associate Degree in Occupational Studies through its nine month program as well as a variety of ways to improve specific skills related to the marine trades. This proposal also supports the following goals of the Growth Management Act: cp c:) 1. Urban Growth (pg. 1-13): "Encourage development on urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient 0o manner". This proposal is adjacent to existing commercial development in Port Hadlock. The public facilities and services needed for future campus cc development already exist. Q 2. Transportation (pg. 1-13): "Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with County and City Comprehensive Plans". The future development of the site in question will include a Public Access Trail that will reduce the number of vehicular trips needed by the NWSWB students and staff and will also allow access to the general public. The Trail is included in the Jefferson County Non-motorized Transportation and Recreational Trail Plans. 14(d)We believe the NWSWB proposal meets the concurrency requirements for transportation in that no capital improvements are needed to accommodate this proposal. We have come to this conclusion based on the following: Initial verbal discussions with Washington State DOT and Jefferson County Public Works Indicate that no capital improvements will need to be made for State Route 116 or to Lower Hadlock Road. Discussions with the DOT were based on the Maximum Planned Campus (88 persons) and it was determined that it would take some 200 left hand turns during peak hours from SR 116 onto Lower Hadlock Road to trigger a traffic study. The maximum campus case is well below that threshold. Conversations with Jefferson County Public Works have centered on a more realistic near term NWSWB population of 60 persons. No significant capital improvements were required as long as the NWSWB continues development of its planned Public Access Trail. This planned trail is included in the recently completed Jefferson County Non-motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan. The Trail will significantly mitigate the lunch time vehicular trips by NWSWB staff and students by providing access from the campus to the Port Hadlock restaurants and food establishments. There will also be bike racks and showers on the five-acre campus plan to encourage bicycle use. The general public will also have access from the town center to their historic waterfront and beaches. Both SR116 (Major Collector) and Lower Hadlock Road (Local Access) have an adopted level of service (LOS) standard of C. For SR 116 (Table 10-7) from Irondale Road to Flagler Road the LOS Capacity ADT is 7400, Existing ADT 4800 and the forecast ADT for the year 2018 are 5,857. The maximum campus plan will not significantly alter these numbers. For Lower Hadlock Road from Oak Bay Road/SR116 to Water Street the LOS Capacity ADT is 7400, Existing ADT is 584 and forecast ADT for year 2018 is 713. The existing LOS and the forecast LOS for Lower Hadlock Road is both a B. This proposal will have an effect on the current and forecasted numbers, however, minimal increases should occur after the campus build out as there is little room for additional development along the waterfront. 14(e)This proposal will have minimal impact on public services. There is underground electrical power and water just outside this property. NWSWB has recently installed a septic drain field on an adjacent property easement with treatment tanks located on one of our waterfront properties (see Health Department Septic Permit# SEP01-00058). The current road system and planned roads to the campus will provide access for fire and emergency vehicles. 14(f)We believe our proposal is consistent with many specific goals, policies and implementation strategies as stated above. We believe we are attempting to utilize this topographically distinct area in a manner that benefits the NWSWB, surrounding businesses, residents of Port Hadlock and Jefferson County. The proposed usage on this site enhances the future competitiveness of the NWSWB, the maritime heritage of the waterfront area and promotes public access and involvement in both active and passive water-oriented activities such as kayaking, sailing and picnicking. 14(g)We believe this project will not result in significant adverse impact to County services and facilities. The move of the NWSWB to this site from Glen Cove will result in some different service providers and response centers, but the overall net effect to Jefferson County should be negligible. 14(h)To our knowledge this proposal would not place uncompensated burdens upon existing or planned service capabilities. 14(I) a (i) Access: This site has existing road access via SR116 and Lower Hadlock Road with access to and from the campus site via Lower Hadlock Road. The Public Access Trail will also provide pedestrian access from the Port Hadlock level down through the five-acre campus site and then onto the waterfront. CD (ii) This site has water and electric hookups just off the property boundary. A septic drain field and treatment tanks currently exists and will require only the addition °O of a few holding tanks and connections to the current system. (iii) The physical site is somewhat of a "topographic hollow" that is open to the Q waterfront. All existing residential and commercial buildings at the Port Hadlock town-center level are at least 30 feet higher than the highest terrace on the property in question. The cottages and café along Water Street are physically separated from view of this site by an intervening ridge. The three existing terraces of this abandoned gravel pit site will allow for a campus plan with somewhat separated areas for buildings, school parking and public boat trailer parking (on a full five-acre campus only). This site is surrounded by both residential and commercial properties. As stated above, we feel this physical site has a natural isolation that will somewhat insulate all inhabitants above our campus from our activities. We also feel the campus will provide a visual transition from a more modern commercial area to a historic waterfront. This proposal seeks commercial zoning for the entire property, instead of the current split, to allow for a full campus development using a"conditional use" permitting process per the UDC. 14(j)We do not believe our proposal will create pressure to change the land use designation of other properties as most of the surrounding properties to this site are already developed. Commercial development in the Kivley Center and residential homes on Curtis Street occupy the Port Hadlock level. The Ajax Café, Skunk Island Cottages, Port of Port Townsend boat launch and the two NWSWB owned buildings occupy much of the waterfront level. 14(k)We do not believe this site-specific amendment materially affects the land use and population growth projections. The NWSWB has been in existence for over 20 years so it is assumed that some, if not all, of the NWSWB population and its impact were figured into the original Comprehensive Plan. The move of the school from Glen Cove to this site will merely redistribute that population within Jefferson County. 14(I)The site is located within the Port Hadlock RVC and the Tri-Area UGA. Adequate facilities and services currently exist and this proposal should not significantly impact them. 14(m)As shown in some of the above answers, we believe this proposal is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson County in such broad areas as Land Use, Rural Element, Economic Development, Education and Transportation. APR - 8 2003 Josh Peters From: Josh Peters Sent: Tuesday, December 09,2003 10:28 AM To: 'skip©eco-land.com'; 'pennycreek @olympus.net; 'woodland CO woodlandmgmt.com; 'bill CO nwboatschool.org' Cc: Cheryl Halvorson;Al Scalf; David Goldsmith; 'Doug Peters(E-mail)'; David Alvarez Subject: 2003 Comp Plan amendment cycle update Greetings Comprehensive Plan amendment applicants and/or representatives: The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC)took action on five proposals on the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket on Monday, December 1. All three of the site-specific applications were approved by the BOCC. Two of the proposals (Phillips/Maki and ANE Forests)were approved with conditions. On Monday, December 8,the BOCC discussed and approved two ordinances that will formally adopt Comprehensive Plan amendments. A legal notice is scheduled to appear in the December 17 edition of the Port Townsend&Jefferson County Leader newspaper. The date of publication for the legal notice will initiate a 60-day appeal period. The decisions are presumed valid and are effective December 8. When PDF versions of the adopting ordinances are available,they will be posted on the 2003 Amendment Cycle web page: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/2003%20Comprehensive%20PIan%20Amendment%20Cycle.htm. Should you have any questions, please be in touch. Regards, Josh D. Peters Associate Planner,Long-Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 Direct: (360) 379-4466, Main: (360)379-4450, Fax: (360)379-4473 Email:jpeters©co.jefferson.wa.us Web: htto://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1 Josh Peters From: Josh Peters Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:47 PM To: 'skip @ eco-land.com; 'pennycreek @ olympus.net; 'woodland @woodlandmgmt.com; 'bill @ nwboatschool.org' Cc: Cheryl Halvorson;Al Scalf; David Goldsmith; Doug Peters (E-mail) Greetings Comprehensive Plan amendment applicants and/or representatives: The Planning Commission recommendations for the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket have been forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC),who have scheduled a public hearing on the proposals for Monday, November 24 at 11:15 in the BOCC Chambers at the Courthouse. For more information on the 2003 Amendment Cycle, including the Planning Commission recommendations and the legal notice for the November 24 hearing, please visit this page: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/2003%20Comprehensive% 20Plan%20Amendment%20Cycle.htm. Documents are posted under the"Documents"section. Your attendance at the November 24 hearing is optional. You may also comment in writing prior to or at the hearing, if you so choose. Comments can be mailed to the address below or emailed to<planning@co.jefferson.wa.us>. The BOCC is expected to deliberate and make decisions on each of the proposals under consideration on the 2003 Docket on either the first or second Monday of December. The BOCC agenda are posted here: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commissioners/default.htm. Results will be posted on the webpage linked above. Should you have any questions, please be in touch. Regards, Josh D. Peters Associate Planner, Long-Range Planning Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 Direct: (360) 379-4466, Main: (360) 379-4450, Fax: (360) 379-4473 Email:jpeters@co.jefferson.wa.us Web: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1 Josh Peters From: Wendy Ward Sent: Thursday,July 31, 2003 3:04 PM To: Josh Peters Subject: Curtiss St. Josh, Curtiss Street was platted on 1-20-1887 in the plat of Port Hadlock and has been on the official county road log at least since 1985 (earliest date at my fingertips). If you need any further information please let me know. Thank you, Jefferson County Public Works 1322 Jefferson St. P.O. Box 2010 Port Townsend,WA 98368 360-385-9218 wward@co.jefferson.wa.us 1 • • ,' osi -n 0 �m� WASH. STATE COORD SYSTEM PER ��K p VOL. 18 OF SURVEYS P. 53 mI 1 ..� zzen c.' ybc�0 o NAD 83 (86l � O m>v C d[84.2.pl`_ cmr 0 r o m C.A > �`rn n( c7 mov 1rT1 v o $ m > m Z = or. �.`�yfgo ■ Mill.111111111' C '....t .ti r r e +m = Al $ga•� m mz ° 1 cn o k.,"'NJ - iN ro to 0 z y .9 -I ..� Z417.41- m a " N 09'4 � o s m cn N � - SIa g"w N z o -4 c a rn ; (3�a s 1 3 Fo ca_ !3 a.CZ G. ._�. m 1 Vol-. IS of St.,2v¢vS R 53 -1 ^ -< m H Z _� r rr o 11 q o A � � • 4."c0 �� L -ai rrn c -1 A /� o ,1/44,,,,,,,,0 D o �p r z - Z1 ''''''t: N Z 0 r• = z -< v! N� W a 43/O Fl m m cn m rn ` N v �% 3 to z c z co > n . r. 1 / 1 a m y m "I p 6.1� roq.. .. CO--1 m z r "� A o z a - o W • o cn m W eo a02 N a •° 41- \ 96.t9 c z A < -n o rn °b �a ICI D m '� c a m t z ¢5 gyp ££ co P not a m 364 £.15' ® I I p D Fi N n (t L£• Q nth m \.+ P' m I' m !'y D 5 uA,,1 1\NMA..a.NO'!.Jm.AYA/f 1 / f m 4 O '� A+• c. M1 l rl U . 71: ( W �1 / �T�R� ,co / X • \ / 9.00 T N1.41•11'IF .. '� a\ X < aV Cl) ex 0 cm = 1 O u v ^ �fC (JI 0 —� r m N / O S W os�� \�i ( 8,-4 9;7 1w •• r1 O -4 al C •6..'9"• •� ! ��L \ \ \ V' e• Ch O 1°r�7 13 0 ci � D Z ` S �\ \ Pi ct C P a 'f� �� \ °� � OmC � oVO " 6 o° Q < C cn \ 26 2 09 \ U1 .... ? F TF — __ • 4.°J_ rn ••� N m o rn \''' . F60N� �Q O t� 1. CO C.. ~rF \ .. off, \ • r 'I c� O \ n. c s ao.00 v m ��.� \�\ \ N /47.416 11•E m r� \ \ N 25_.> i'.4' czi u�i w 4�� .\•\ 2�.O-.J3 � H ' a Z _____,..•"*"...„„a\• o�F �•pm z \ r a 9..x . N r \\ \ o• 'o O� mm co Cl) `\ \ j % o- a-I o m mm �Q\ \ .1 1 m 0 CO o\o.- Ir0 �'FR \ \ \ • s A s I. •o N , z N_O O �Q RP J �� �O in zCr 3m r m "4' \\\ O� J i rnO co „O-C za my -CniD m Rp \ \ o,02 y 4 acn m wcoi yozyrP' -I �\ \ .0 °'o-177 071M rrt73 0 ern 0co-4 z� 0 �\ \ o� z to-< m ' rn D\�\ rn v< a a 0 o CO m-0 -0• ..... \•yx\� �, J` ao : c°no C` \ \ •r cs) m won `-I \ \ P r •• Z Z z �N l0 • -c! U7 pi ON \N/ • -n Z..1 ccn m0 Z \ \ x CO Z o =� MI n z -- q .. W z . ` v Q1 O crn r 73 d clla rzn 2 v• o A to 0 N N m O C W m m O cn 03- a mc, 10 . N my O 01 � rn 3 w �a {z co W M Z 1D < p o _ o o -o W — r o s o 73 0 N W m ->p 2 s _.01 > n 0) 4, z. al <m a o x m o .. 0 _1 x > 0 0 0 co f0 z m -°*1 CO > _ L z C7 0 m v o ro T e� u CO i • Z r to co-4 • C o <• m z = -`,., c3 _ z > 0 0 = c N .. 1; > O ... c r- -I z m 4- m o z < •• _ < = r l0 +> u n l \ • o z ( �1 ;1 1p 6 N Rm'I T ��y.J' '� O Q. rr n F ' +•;ode:v.* ,,.ii (0:4; _. co I o o z \...,__400,1,1111.1.ror •- / ; .".\ - I •I m . /a \ Qi• f / 7C WASH. STATE ~ ar COORD. SYSTEM % . PER. VOL 18 OF �' i SURVEYS P. 53 A .. /ow_ v\ , NAD 83 CM j m ti c z \( •�" o c A 2 y c c o �� \ \ ��� 7o . �� //�J E /1 m a m a z >m o y� 4 , , 7,,, g.0 II.ik .,:t `\ . . - it, C m p. -Ai mmm \P \. ,,,..30:,... �.40 , \rox; r N i Z T0\ • \. o c n4 z gm p CR �� \ E m - Ni:,,,, �0E\ P- U tiQ��4<T. . O ->. V- ; 't.44.1'-' ' 401i - •111.. '`.1111111 .-- / ' 4Q z o x / o 0 x z o CA m .-+ 0 N I o -o c 1\ V I O 7 \\r 01� n OD m .Z.1 O al U, - Z 4.0 m N M _ Z Z f • oL = = Co z ^ p$ z 9 O O .. Z c m o W CO W 0) Co Map Output Page 1 of 1 • Streams � �969400407 ''s 9 i60A00A' \----- \ ' 969400104—989400603 't, 1� s '989400406x,s i--- , ___343_ ''s— 96940-- 1 .C:El. �_'s�96940040�! 'sf_-- , —� � _-- 1 -\ s,9...;: 406'1'ss o06o602— 0(10000260 969400102 I I:-- 989400601 .. 'y �r' t —" s ,969400304' 2894001131 960400102 901024036969400403 '� s s ' t---' —989400603 _ I \.—- s�989400403',��_ s 969400101 �—0000000550 -, f 969460404 �r— `� '901024018 s -1-1-'-- ti ''1 \------- --- ■ '',s '+ Legend 90101 0 Selected Features 00000020 \ 901013015 \ Perceta-F'l J'F \ 90101301 r 901024038 \"---1-� s �1 Streams r J.�_ j____-,t r' I+ 901013016 ii' I x 'titi � Type 9 000000002 �/ 941024030~ 001013014 000000230 /' I' 90101.111 x`s r" Typea i l' 1 1 x'4 T0,14 ,��901013014 % , 901013013 �� s'.y �/ Type 3 - i /I Type 901024035' - '-,r ; I t Type 1 . 901013012 i I it901024047 r�_ /! I 1I Mgr lx..1 901413141 1024057 9A 2D0000001` . ;901013006 i i' ' ` �,'t Maps s rrnidedtry JeResan Canty CmMSevicesGIS i'' 0 34211 `t, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Aug 05 14:09:13 2003 //gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 A•uifer Rechar•e .., ', --.--,°'`r,..1. — r, ',1 ' 9&9400104—X100803 - v�,9,0701 a -.,,e ry; '"�"'' 989400300 1189400603 '' %,, ----- ( .- 96640070 ..�„�.. _. ,,r.. 000000260 989400102 ! u ,�;.... ,.,,K.,. 969400113 900400102 ' \ 98940063 _- / } • rr , -";rrnrr„ rrw 989030111_1.1_ ,..0000.00250:r r;r r / f \\ Legend ;f/ /--- , \ I Parael6 H NOSS ;�••. 1?130 ( .,.,. ; / �„ "Cancel Aquifer Recharge f I SUSC.UNK ,I,1,1.1.1 .0A r / 101'3001 1 ■ SeRPA 4 SUSC ' g. �ti ■ s•RPA ■ S•RPA 4 UNK SST`'IT' \ 1 r. i 'a1D)k[10l ■\ 342f1 ` 1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its •rrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Aug 05 14:13:10 +003 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True... 8/5/2003 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Boat School CPA -- UGA Photo ..ci= .:11, 44.4'le{'gyp. i .,. y _ K a a ,, : � Legend T6Wt1S 0 Cosily Sam Y4, * Bard Cemtrs �, , / Road System i. , I Parcaels-H UGA Photo ..t t 41 t Me<as fsv ided by Jefferson Courtly Caning Setiioo GIS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its errectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Jul 25 15:10:23 +003 http://maps.co Jefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap_outside&ClientV... 7/25/2003 Parcel Print. Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 901013016 Owner Mailing Address: STERLING/SALLY HUNTINGFORD JOHN/MARILYN SHOW SAMUEL SWANSON PO BOX 179 PORT HADLOCK WA 983390179 Site Address: Section: 1 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum(1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 211 Mapped 5.36 Planning area: Tri-Area(4) Acreage: Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S1 T29 R1W TAX 41 Q No Photo Available ® No 2nd Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_N0=901013016 04/09/2003 Map Output. Page 1 of 1 FEATURES NOT SURVEYED -90 013 016/ NW S • •I •'W• • • B• • I• .11 Legend 0 Selected Features • Shoreline Photos-14 Towns c) county Snap * Romp Colors 0,Aft Road System L] Parcels 14 County Zoning �e8?400108 a QO7prT '„i; As,a3 er384ot�•01 9�8A400LDi 9E�4001oT e e4004507, e0101 Jo- D70'4 ft WORT e9940010S 989400e02 5, ESQ4OO'302 e�80400l as g,�g40p7y tt ■ cOM_FY]RES7•eG 9m ;0-'4 \ \ A. I CR oAosGe $80100407000.0.044 .,D8040040e 4 . e 89400104 08044010, CRC6SRCAU3-4 C 1111( 1111 CROSSROADG.NC 't !•.!c e89400701 IIII GLEN COVE WC IOW eE6400402 ` e$?4001(YL .••..• HEAVYlIOUSTRW AA4(N.'' l X6400113 X8$4001! 1 ti e 9A94o04c eb9400iot `�. dl l.; f x , �yi Y�"� ��5 muTANOUSTRNI rem JL • i r a � ,k `t=u ; ,, \tit MILITARY RESERVAT I 1 X0101' ; , . T. 4 AIPit-NiULTFAAiLY ...-.1 013015 t ,AA. A' °* AIPR•{)PEN SPACE m. 601ot3ots �� \\\ �•1Q'2- - ',�., MPR•RCICF eolot!1 t f i (imio1300i MPR•RECREATICN •!101 a!, �R+ ! 0 • ,��°Y � � MPFp•SRIGr E FAM TROTS 4::'” I I:''1101301 ` !1®i301 ■ MPR-SIfIGLEFAMRY IV �, II MPR•Vpp1AI#CBITB� + NATIONAL FOREST +at°. ' w `N NATpvaNALRE Ud ii •, F1'•. s� PARIiSANDRECREATION 5 ��' PORTTOWNS131DUGA # ,, ' r. a ,t 5 ■ FRST RES.84Q431 N6 illak 001013006 ' ° t RURAL VILLAGE CENTER $Q1QL.r• � �� \ III RURALFCRESi•,IU p s ■ RURALRES.1.10 � � e; ' RURALRES.1.2f1 0720Q00o4',,,d ,, f.\\ un - II n.„,..., 7ik RURALRESi•5 UNKNOWN ;-;`- WASTE FACUUTY w HON RESERVATION CCPIAULT RESERVATION ■ NATIONAL RANK u FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. oning information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made •uring the 1999 Comprehensive Plan amendment process.Zoning designations must be confirmed with the De•artment of Communit Develo•ment. http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=parcels&ClientVersion=3.1&Form=True&Enc... 04/09/2003 >- CC CD H CA = O) I C3 LL r- "O L Z LL \ U _ O H O Lf3 -7 O O U D) CU Cl) W Cl) O 'O - J O O O L CD i 'O X O: 'O � CO Z C U 1 0 0 H W 0 �. Cl) 0) 0) I 7 L , L L 4 Cl) N.- L U U W Z 2 0 0 \ \ U I--' o O C) m m 1-- Co -0 r- } = O 0 O J U CC 1 CC J "O O CA W Q C = 3 LL CO 2 F- CO CO \ O LO CO O CO \ J U C] Z CO -0 <C. CD Z H O) C X O Z H F-- •- H 3 Z 0 3 ]- N J = J CC F-- d- CC CO 2 O 3 _O CC o W W CO 2 C W CO H J W }- CA Z W Cl. <-- CO CO Cr J O O O Q C] J Z 07 Y •• CC .- • X \ C] Q } Z U CO CL o X C) Q Q CA J ¢ O) O O) .- CC F- • H 3 P� J C] J N 2 O W CD CC CO • • O X LL I- Z Q CC U W 'O O) .- CD X W H X J X 2 i CC U N It Z 1- O) J J ■ W O F- H CA CL. 2 Z = m i-- O X H co co W 2 X CC m r- Q Z O d O I-- O Q O O CD CA F- _ +, \ U CA CO O_ Cl. 2 CO CO O CI) O O LC) Cr) ti O F- , Z , o = m W 2 f� o d- o 0 0 0 O o -O L .-- CO L) U m N N = # C O I- N •• L a L Z Y C - N O -i-r CD = m N = CD •- = 2 L m O 10 CD 'O > CO U L L d - O 10 O_ C- O CO X -1-J U 'O X co co IZ CO -- •- 01 CD F- t- X 4- F- CA 10 9- ott- h' 3° ' ` s z'1'. v ""� s at ,a :ge 3 • l forth es Sc hOtl of Wgo4L.n Bo t 3uZI4i OQ + 3 1 ,!,i : r J' « s .a�i - -Y`"' to.it''' t 4...6:4., PortT,',, ,WA 983689780 ,°; _ .. _ ,ray ` Jeff Co Dept.of Community Development z ' * , *2 250 00 s ., t E ,r Tu�o Thou atld Two .. 'd`F. add Ofl/100*********** *- 4.**_,.,,„„,„.,*,,,,,,,,,---,':, .....0,0-',...;.-...-.,..4,00* ***# � ., ; i + Jeff.Co.Dept of Comme�tuty Development st a{ 7 E i b wS x y �k C ,�s Iff �' u _�i �._ t�init v a J ¢ 3 ,Br � '� Y. . '�"ry;°A ei 11.0I, 5544x1' is 2C 'AG 762E°s.C] 0 i-,, > . JEFFERSON COUNTY L (_ NO. 56006 DATE Li IS/0 RECEIVED FROM i�` ' }(!E-,-' 'i lti ,i�_\\.)'..,)()O t. b:,)1 \ CiA (a DESCRIPTION 1,^J BARS# AMOUNT , CURRENCY '. COIN D S L. L. H CKS Z s CE x -A.....,,.... D DD W t t 't RECEIVED BY r TOTAL fi x` O �' ... . , APR - 8 2003 A