Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2014-00036
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MICHAEL J RICHARDSON BRIDGET A KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM WA 98325-9746 DATE ISSUED: February 06, 2015 DATE EXPIRES: February 06, 2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA14-00071 PROJECT PLANNER:Anna Bausher PROJECT DESCRIPTION: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26, Township 28N, Range 1 E, located off of Bywater Way, Port Ludlow, WA. CONDITIONS: 1.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 2.) A Stormwater Site Plan was submitted on September 9, 2014, and was revised September 22, 2014, and has been approved by the Department of Community Development on February 6, 2015. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan. No clearing shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed and implemented. 3.) Prior to any land disturbing activity the applicant shall apply for a Class IV General Forest PracticesApplication from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The applicant shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Department of Natural Resources. 4.) Prior to commencing land disturbing activity, the applicant shall contact Washington State Department of Ecology in order for Department of Ecology to determine if a Construction Stormwater General Permit is required for this project. If permit is required, the applicant shall comply with all conditions set forth by Department of Ecology. 5.) The project is located in close proximity to an identified wetland and is subject to the delineation provisions of Section 3.6.9 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. Based upon the proposed location of the project in relation to the identified wetland, the applicant has agreed to maintain a buffer(setback) that exceeds the standard buffer requirements by fifty (50) percent. The applicant acknowledges the additional setback and agrees to maintain the extra 50 percent buffer, therefore, waiving the wetland delineation requirements of the Unified Development Code. 6.) A setback of 60-feet, measured perpendicularly from the wetland edge, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. 7.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 8.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 9.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on February 6, 2015. 3.) This approval is for a Stormwater Management Permit to clear two acres of timber to convert to residential use through class IV general forest fractices only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 4.) The revised site plan as submitted with the Stormwater Mangement application on January 13, 2015 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated February 6, 2015 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 5.) A Wetland Assessment Report prepared by Marine Surveys and Assessments was submitted on December 1, 2014 in conjunction with the application to address the wetlands on the prarcel. 6.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on September 17, 2014 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: special aquifer recharge protection area, and wetlands. 7.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 8.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including the marine environment, are included as "critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. The Threshold Determination for this Type I Permit may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. For more information related to SEPA appeals see JCC 18.40.810. UDC Administrator M LA14-00071 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_M LT_IssuePermit_U.rpt 2/6/2015 Page 3 of 3 -0 2 < Ca r 0. n M S-.' CD 13 r70- r.) r— a/ , „,.. a▪° <., = 0 a 0", .t 0■-*,1 a. * 0 - ar — 0, Fa- ke, -1, a■ r-- 0 C Iv n z cm na = en -e o- E. o ,.. m ' * vs rt) et ,-. o * o C .-. m vs , Ct. fa in 'i 0 0 0 i 0 --, Ps i 2, _ ...--- g 5 0. o -..., .... I i 0 0 0 —.1 ......_ ....ii , rD el g ... fa 6 <-1 cr■ ri 4.L) NJ ■-• cr.? 3 0 n 3 ...r ..••• 3' 01 rr IA z .17 0 m --■ 0„, < P., # 1•••• ,.., r' el ul ow ,p- r7, 3 o 7it • 113 C 41 VI aj 0 ,,,, C a St J., o. 113 00 , r) ■-• ", MI C., I fa 9 . ...1 ,-, a 6. 0, 1 m a 2 ' v6 ,.., 1 P n v, rs :1 .t.-- iiT 2 hi.- 0: — 0 rt7 i 174 0 1 0r Z rn c, -,:--,-1 - ,, ' > 0 = 0 ,„.„. :".V. F c e 6 r-.0 -=.1 -n •••••1 %.# 1 . sn •k- 0 i rntil rT1 '1:, .,.....'"1 ,, '.C..,---; -,--<7,-- •--•••:1 ,---,---1 CS >. jL Fli ; Z C) I _ ) ---.: —......___. et • 3' 4 L I i r 4' ) % JEFFERSON COUNTY ---\\\ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Oki 1 l J L ' .,. , 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend -Washington 98368 -- , fe 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax C kYti-1110)" ...,,/,/ http://www.cojefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 1-.) l SEP 2 2 2014 \ LT oc-001Iirtl°1\'11TCYCiDLIENTj'TYFIONVIENT ' STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE mu,# 1.1'1 -.."'' 0 0° 1"( PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: 1-0t *40_l''''L\''` ':'\ ' 1:1") * r';.,ft ,, 0 ei Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. t ii'r VI VN CI "'A- :71-C ',. i . +1).1',A Existing Conditions Summary 1 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. 1.-t'l rA .-!--,,-,.- -pe' I . ("/ -1-- ' - ,., ,1,-, se , 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. 1\,--ie, 0.-v--,-,E,-,..c,,. c)(r--c. lei '4.1 177 AA.-,ki i 1 ; CC r C??, ,, c, ctot,Wil '7,1",'',at k TV%C Le i S IL Ni."'f':A., DA()a cir, cci 4 0,c k . N,-t ',...,o , {, 1 0i 0 i i ft("nr 0 L'V't '..'\r14--) a 1..n.c Q.., co*,,,,' 'of ,.,',.6„A,,e r‘, 'L\..4. +-)‘.0 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. Co, So-I a j ( 0 ci l'i 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e.,drainage;behavior of water on the site—above, below,and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. ,--ek ta Ai i a 4,,r1 „a ,„_rt ric1, b)k r'S ,,), Z. i< ( O ') (-rprb (i vo,1 ativ: sivrrno, ak-r 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: I- -' ,': , " ' „" , X. e ., u ' stotrnwate site p.a,teeroate dot;—rev 4 282014 5 • 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. P. p i)=r"" vi 4 1 0 0=el roico,,.:7-, 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site,including adjacent land uses and structures,utilities,roads,and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands,lakes,steep slopes,etc.). f: r-,c4(.4 r, (1 f) 4 4' (42,r Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium' size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology,as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed(i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual)or,if not,what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. -e tweemost?j, w d1/4)-tir Ldpst4 pu 8t p T6 ? C (AAA ct-tax-i,v,1 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities,describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] •/ 11. Describe the performance goals and standard applicalzi to the project. crC1 to nct to h IA Cfa ilckkekret... (1-W rt. ) Jo 12. Describe the flow control system, dAs sto-rm ate-site pia"temp'ate —rev.4 282014 13. Describe the water quality system. 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. Pr 15. Describe the source of fill material,physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. N Pr 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. tJPc 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.) If included, list the Manuals here. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. a vvc reo\ci--/ P ttirl‘a kAa.,\-1,0Y 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. starmwater se p template —re 4282014 7 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. tn. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at Volume II Section 32.3 of the Manual(beginning on page 3-7), 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. = Wt.use d 8m9 T6 ?-)0 c-4 6.\:$i>4.%1.0114 ckfary CaPktil exikAASo4313 el 0 ktowy.A.'v„.t, C kt ri ria,q a it a— eca.3 no) I-0 (,oei a eke d off- io J.-1, 2. Establish Construction Access. I Cit-AS c k l i t t-A • l i S.V.‘‘ itiALI I D a,S P o i o N It ,k co,kka point of 'kb() eitwe 11/4, a."). posst41, ,,o&truct-inet. wit( * 1 0.. a cs 4 olLt 0 ;It • O Sv‘viA.444- \616:3i 14;AI vote on riloals ten SNA-14011:6 Ptr 3AP toot etotoet L 3. Control Flow Rates. 6,:ea,(101,Nel v.typo- .ts p io bec .S\JJ r clA vuto,lytry,\J„Jam„.,uyopi, 1. ktivcitmeA 64,a,14.;fru At% ckbo et. op fit‘k Pic b riVk nfl gCrakert;Sla ‘ahtk-tp rSote. 'atoetei no r OtriatAs. 4. Install Sediment Controls. Ikte.-""k\t .2;o1s.itt,„ , CvA &A.Cittiljrn *,40 VVN)r * 1,*,.0=‘ "rn SIrtattO VAIL ,OCItrf'"%t6 •61nt C-1,1)0, 5. Stabilize Soils. cee_AT a boil- \At ki,itkk a‘st, vst, torn? CI-2-‘ rAk4.16,,,AN kht-e 0.494.‘ ckAti, ctz iVOV w 4 Vo tokoh AA 'to c10% IdAa. t tatrLo 0(Oil& Sts4 c) No SW til AnA-- tithe ei 6. Protect Slopes. WA" WAS coctrit 7, Protect Drain Inlets, t). t‘lo 684mSrittiark ‘Mtki Ckto....)91,0„ \-0 AlA:A.0 I kw&(Awl*wilt stormwate,se p`ao terrp'ate doo—rev,4 2a 20'4 f 12 Required Elements-Construction SWPPP(continued) i 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. .. . Set 4X—4, &lora. 4 No aft c•",k-t„ e/tika AvitS or ati-044) 1,--Ak\at. ‘.4..Nt.C.1 9. Control Pollutants. • (\VA/NJ ‘rt & safe:riot elin ‘I ch I-LAI_ yvvAi Ai- avict. uilki , .. :. o.A Co .4-tuth o:A. s;ci, lititti) it- IA 04 Lys 14-Am ..c. A) tAitlk kot, i ry,rAt as itit.tt.a er,*os et 1,,,p. 10. Control De.Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). .. , flik rkida froitck 16 (AAA ctAirtNg‘ ay4„, tio Echmvi.ceklksyt v.), or ichel 0 v., 41-013ti el to or\e— v.,,T, .. L>e a.one....,, 1/40 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs), VIC t.iil.04 tv1 0 4-kW( iN(Y‘eN CkCA..k, 0 twa Q. 0, 11.4" (VA ))tiva el i-o a te, vi. / Ct,o4 .t vtitv‘44 ci . , d 12. Manage the Project. I ,, tiActe,i(C)\-&A.61. 41A41..-/4 ' * i 5 9 al')fit # , ,. I # iAlt if k - MAIO Vrit k.iv'M I) in ,jet ).( . ca n i A Lb.i el e. tot. ie4tet4 Front'if, to 41,4,6 1/20x..4.-6 cu tat 30) o 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas,roads). ¶a -h .. NI orNlet. i sex::3.0.1-Ali --"No wo,.., . tuici4/.011-iji, p .• )41Akto4 cc'g cktiv.,.. (rrtas4-1, tveo„ttAN rty,fitemN pita ptrn4\ ..-ro -Kt_ vi ti,N&St 2. 3 ati-- 1-4.116.1,44‘.4,1 pin 'f...s, . 1\t„. tsuitryl, 1 o,,crt.ok,, 1\4.1 e it.. wt..X‘n vklyie) a rtel, , (ANA 0 4AAA,i Z S. WO OdAt4 1 r IttApteil op al. atte,. lx...3.S b. Description of the downstream drainage path leatling from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). - . L. ft ■ ' t Oat. on ...SWit Pild in t*N. ti„,;(1.,31-0 CA0.44.Aft t 1Am/wat an ki 00 P#C111 '1 A 0,...- v.t.e,A., 1,,,a itvA tIA tiAL eikt OM i k" .. VIA,0.1$1 4?..11-t yids i'tki+. A-no*,4.4- 1 CO utctrciA easi- ftft. 1-1A;t. f).1 ic. rkiwot:1/44. es eikt .. 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. 5 Cf.. WtiA0,01,1 r04.I-1M,,S,VOA- Ear t 0,1 t- rvi MI- at--te- of- e(DPech)- sitylwater site Wan ternp:ate doc—rev 4 2s2314 9. b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. *to. Oat 41‘,„Ci4C WCbttv N4‘ ei1, AAN , '444. .."1\11,'4„:'‘4 04, (1,0 fr/{ A Oft * r fo 1,2..33 it- • I or 04:e- kr..•$ (t5i cit-e fOrtia IA 3,e- tN, ci.ft ek&Ocr ixatA-f, tvrliTajter )) 4 (AA\ V-14-4C\-QV, 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on site soils(e.g.,erodibility,settleability,permeability,depth,texture,soil structure). , \I OfVe,4 4+1 .NA'Arift‘ lg tat. 11\14.E. SkOK Or firer is, IS 431g or it-ss IkkoAct. 0 Pa No ct4A:kti or 4 4 ° t L4 414°L 1N1/4t4AE, Chlta MAC wak. ckr",yti CøOJciC scifisto I etypt„ 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence (.1.4.&141 • it .1 CAL4 ' k•-• Ir‘ cm (4 f } V raj rit145 ir 0 t * t 00 ) t. 0 a• A. * ' *kik b. Construction phasing(if proposed) - (4120 ;t 6e 01,...cofendewc- wt t:(1 I — 10 tit9S. 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. lJL \ay 1-tt skrt..6- PL.'S L000 Ptc, PO SS t (04k-tirVtnhi pan Iptir II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. ,cAantie, b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. 0/1„CkPle, 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. Wat Son b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. oyNe, 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following,if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. Jr fail tri$K.pee Stiy% b. Diversions. tt c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations I strymwater site pa templateAoc—rev,4282O4 10 SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan,a stormwater site plan,and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block _ c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes ( I ( lJ V I r 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. SEP b. North arrow. + c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines,pasture areas, lc.). J) d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. JEFFERSON COUNTY e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaties of PPI UNITY DEVELOPMENT f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales,interceptor trenches,or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches,or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades,dimensions,and direction of flow in all ditches,swales,culverts and pipes. • e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s),pond(s), pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth,length,and wid th dim stout, d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe,and/or other filtering devices f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s),if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. T` k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g.,concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. • stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 11 • Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems,treatment facilities,flow control facilities,or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts")when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all o the affected property. 60 9 (LANDOWNER 0 UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) - THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: • P V STORMWATE FEB 6 207R 5 PLAN - JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF CO=TY EVELOPMENT NATURE: stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014. 12 • ON c JEFFERSON COUNTY ¢ o w" ., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelooment o" � Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcdaco.'efferson.wa.us `rHI ,co" I I 1 SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits 6 Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 6,2015 PROPONENTS: Michael J Richardson Bridget A Kaminski-Richardson 2034 W Valley Rd Chimacum,WA 98325 PROPOSAL: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. PROPERTY LOCATION: Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26,Township 28N, Range 1E, located off of Bywater Way,Port Ludlow, WA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: White Rock Cove Tract 5 W/PTN OS V10/P105 NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00071 APPLICANT: MICHAEL J RICHARDSON BRIDGET A KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM WA 98325-9746 Application Received Date: September 9, 2014 Application Complete Date: January 14, 2015 Application Notice Date: January 21, 2015 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: BYWATER WAY Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26, Township 28N, Range 1E, located off of Bywater Way, Port Ludlow, WA. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on February 4, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. Project Planner: Anna Bausher,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00071 APPLICANT: MICHAEL J RICHARDSON BRIDGETA KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM WA 98325-9746 Application Received Date: September 9, 2014 Application Complete Date: January 14, 2015 Application Notice Date: January 21, 2015 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: BYWATER WAY Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26, Township 28N, Range 1E, located off of Bywater Way, Port Ludlow, WA. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on February 4, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Anna Bausher, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by January 21, 2015. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA14-00071 Proponent(s): MICHAEL J RICHARDSON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental PolicyAct(SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of , 2015. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2015. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in , Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA14-00071 Proponent(s): MICHAEL J RICHARDSON \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp14 APO_U.rpt 1/15/2015 4,soN `'°6 JEFFERSON COUNTY ZoV�I -1 � '44 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT tio� 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment �s�IN�z Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 1 Email:dcdAco.jefferson.wa.us • Building Permits &Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Master Permit Application MLA: \ `" t Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Clear 2 acres of a 3 acre parcel of timber for future single family residence building, pasture, and shop Tax Parcel Number. 821265017 Property Size: 3,acres/Va 1is8s,)4(acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Pr front Paradise Bay Rd up Hidden Springs Rd right on Bywater Way.frhe parcel is between 673 Bywater Way and 743 Bywater Way Property Owner(s)of Record: Mike Richardson and Bridget Kaminski-Richardson Telephone:360-774 6022 Fax: email: mikeandbridgetr@embargmail.com Mailing Address: 2034 W Valley Rd Chimacum WA 98325 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Us.[C(n) C(d) or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"c U� r ss�i r ❑ Change• Commercial Use ❑Boundary Use Line .1r_.t ) !i ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** 1 • ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** S E P ,,. 9 I{ ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ''` ■ I ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Arn@ndments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteratio,i'- 8 Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program t c- ' .r, -e eri'nit Revision** • ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Manageme ` 1-!•l �` ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: r DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,istrue and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with-respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the appl' e oa �j•.,�-he wants priors Signature: Date: The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the 411 "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not viotate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans fgre po ` ility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer ansigns f and dates it below. Signature: / Date: 911 / 11 07/24/2013 BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that 110 they will be assuming responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: Q I I 9 i 1 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: (360-746022 ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: 2034 W Valley Rd Chimacum WA 98325 EMAIL: mikeandbridgetr@embargmail.com CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE (360-7)4-6022 FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: 2034 W Valley Rd Chimacum WA 98325 EMAIL mikeandbridgetr@embargmail.com Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Proiect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank andlor Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: Underground Tank Above ground tank Size of Propane Tank: Heat Stove Cook Stove Woodstove Fireplace.nsert rehtO I evotS telleP I knaT retaWtoH I Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property III lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH BId App Review. 2fd Floor Heated Currsiatenk,yReVlelw. DLO 5tbernw M' 41.6-80 . 0° Other Heated BEEP, q (q•o D Mezzanine Additional Section: 1 q •e o Heated Basement .lerrehede-fee: 'Do SkOffl>,w 2 • (a5 • Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport SUBTOTAL I n �� Decks 911/Rd Approach fee: "! Other TOTAL: $ `q 30 •00 Receipt Number: 16)5) 1 Cash/Check Number: 3&. � ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: q/°11/LI 410P .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Initials: 6q a 07/24/2013 411 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST UPDATED 2014 Purpose of checklist: 1l E C H IJ �71E _ Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the vine men a imp- `/• ,• proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if avail=a avoidance, minimiza 1 n or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant irk a cts SR an in m: tat impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. ! J L I i I I JEFFERSON COUNTY Instructions for applicants: Jhelpl __ PEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use"not applicable" or "does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant 1 adverse impact. • Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:J help l For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words"project,""applicant,"and "property or site"should be read as"proposal,""proponent,"and "affected geographic area," respectively.The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects)questions in Part B-Environmental Elements—that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. background Jhelpl 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Jhelpl L Ckefisty, ; i �rf1 •2. Name of applicant: Jhelpl ' v., viA.A.,ca w1 ar f;riti r ik IMV,/4 "YALSArtaiSOCI 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Jhelpl 0 314 W V&�l 0 04. )„. ,atno„c., r c1%315,(3t��1-1y loaZz f3tap)3ok_ I93'1 ar dCf-Ir r�t�ke SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 1 of 11 FOEUVE 4. Date checklist prepared: jhelpl ' j Z1 1`k I r, II - 9 2014 ' 5. Agency requesting checklist: jhelpl tk.cd-9),(1 JEF E,.;ON COUNTY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): jhelpl Er l*� *( , , is y DEVELOPMP -rArt-y WI (B, 1/K415 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. jhelpl Yes vre c\ah , u A k �-SF(2' \V\ 7D . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Jhelpl 1 vJa.\tuna d,Q,, c 0,,A 0,AN:i]rl, a S Fa Wk. k 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. jhelpl (Jor . 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Jhelpl S1PP1 De - ,rh441 a s')or wokkrx a 404 C l o t s<1 IV Caene.,rr I test re.);c.IMc4 s �,1�iVi2 1T I/ii /I S!. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to • describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)Jhelpl �� 4-wcts maws. 2 awes Of o.. 3 acre. P�. - t 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Jhelpl T 2. &C)1 E S 2. o' Lo+5 otr ‘.4.)‘\;.k-t, (off. Co-ft'Nth r pprcej ' C22(95 0 j ° (0)AV-3 W f This �o .s be4 t een (n43 c 'd 143 64'14 a}t. W P,r La tAN " B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS jhelpl 1. Earth a. General description of the site Jhelpl (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Vic) S I opt,, '}0 klAt. t sk , noirvcod2 cmotok terkt 1C W i' • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?jhelpl )10/0 SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 2 of 11 ` ' CSC IJ V/ c. What e general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, • muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any ,. c _ 9 agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in"`' removing any of these soils. jhelpl 55C Aa.(� Sc�✓t U 0 vY� 1ESONC016���; IMMUN._..�Ty pt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, __ describe. jhelpl 1 e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. jhelpl cAtaAn .04-Ps '\°J p as,Wm.) c&ctc,,ri,, sr A 5w'p f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Jhelpl Ik g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project/ construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?Jhelpl 0% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: jhelpl Ufa 4_ Ottf ... )y\ X.CA' 'of we. 1ah� 11?-44ckt\l �e CGk CA-Cf, . L&& t cA, -tvua c( Y'O `c v t ion 2.Air • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during constructions operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Jhelpl Eax.s, N- c.ha r, Sew►, cc) 105 .�v b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. jhelpl N c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: jhelpl 14 0r 3. Water a. Surface Water: jhelpl 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Jhelpl ci 2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. jhelpl fit► Cam, `k\61 c rt, bp/ b Jfcis . • SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 3 of 11 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Ill Indicate the source of fill material. jhelpl rid c't 6 r 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give; rE C Lh 0 V Fr I description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. fhelpT N 01 I 2014 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location orb i el kite plan. 9 I '; Jhelpl Li, 6 JEFFERSON COUNTY 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface wateA- ,MUNiTY DFUEEOP^j` describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Jhelpl N 0 , 64 fors a 4 5,6e on wm Omit 'r tPlem'cn1-rho\ b. Ground Water: 1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater?Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. JhelpT 0 a 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the • number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Jhelpl N0 c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. jhelpl No (Vr%okk Q" ' ' y3'i e, 1ri 4A AIY svv dX3 fluli t (*Art i ste, 5 Kr.rvnlifitkVe 1711. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or urface waters? If so, generally describe. fhelpl `,,IG,cak .ea t ovmAi- h \Wi w�.p�.vtof 0 loVr 1-erx.ko 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. 1\1 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: S .e S W a, c-' ?\oi e,\j uL5e -,► (op,,,on Wu,‘,• bn Shmm tom'. Nutii per(, 2 f Z v o l VT (3 M P T 5. 30". AL( rs,pist 'tort hu CA,lt u(Gak"4 PE r5 i r)1 -"NrWSVI n ekki Vt. mt-Vvr\1iTA, 4. Plants Jhelpl a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: jhelpl ciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other • snubs ,grass SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 4 of 11 , [ LC [ Vn ' pasture , l_,1, crop or grain 'r," i • rchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ) S ti 2014 wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush, skunk cabbage, Ier �-_____ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other JEFFERSON COUNTY _DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?jhelpl r v`2a nMt � vt ANA O 0,1∎1 4 a b Sol I P I U v1 hc44 se 11,0 week so: I p\avk e)cic o n- Z a.c w.s a ncluctOaP c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. jhelpl Smarr"wA '4143 l'141°Y1 fit. S ivrri►.wrthc pt a v. none d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: jhelpl c.„r s o . I a'Ad pit\ext" w{w`%t sad .- n 0.h'�t,rv►x 6. s> s<.ed e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. can ad `S-h P f F��t_m 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Jhelpl • birds: AM heron, eagle, on•bird other: mammals: cii.M ' --) , elk, beaver, other: fish; bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Jhelpl py.N c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Jhelpl A - y rt-.\-v\Uvv oc d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: jhelpl l ` \ ' 6\-vgikcu4c ""i e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. A'frt 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Jhelpl GS p l � , et. Vt'tn;L1t,.� av\,.a()Ivy .,smo) . c v d ,)ofte - b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. [help' N t° • SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 5 of 11 F.P\ lE L IMIl�; H c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this j r pos List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: fhet • � t .. 2014 Iv 1f i !1 7. Environmental health J[FFFFsON COUNTY I a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic cFemircals�U-r s` ����� OEVEUOP�!Fr!r of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Jhelpl 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. (WA., 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Y 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. oya ( 01/4,,n S .r i rt La vo 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. FaPao„diky,e,„Or 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NY'4e... • b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? fhelpl o A2.. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. fhelpl G a Sa.vv V j fat S', 'try ck-S 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: [help] WoTic. on\ at.,Acrt vis ckcuj t%e)- F- ar(' 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Jhelpl -Ilt,s is kn 4rea. O' 5,:rs,t... EptwtiL41 v uin.ca. (0A'il w%4- tint *-',1 "1j f foe(c f-. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use?fhelpl 11^424-4.‘s iatt,� U1- h;t,}we;c. I is (}'vv1 0 n s ik 6 � kltti acre,, a 1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, ID tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: pii 0 SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 6 of 11 C� C� � [1dC c. Describe any structures on the site. 'help.' nom@, I s - 9 2014 • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? fhelpl n 0 JEFFERSON COUNTY ERT �f COMMUNITY VELD"g'ENT _ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?Jhelpl ' , . i f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?Jhelpl 2 o x- a.Q cv.t_a Sc(Z g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? fhelpl A h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. pet.;i0..1 i\ u`cer Jhelpl N° � we& tip for mac. vv-cli !a, cd v, c R,ezhet role_ 1Proi'ech on Areo■ i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?Jhelpl 3 iv, i `I /i 5 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?Jhelpl k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Jhelpl N pc L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com,,patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Jhelpl See. CL- t i<-'s m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: N0 rte. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. Jhelpl none_ c c( k V.i S t yv,cci,cocc, ?coif b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Jhelpl no,(\e, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Jhelpl 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?Jhelpl no y\2. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? fhelpl none.s '� e1i- " c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 'help.' wow c€,eeAr+ B ch?olt ti - v 11 19X an„S At AC-nit;loofa c't I 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly • occur? fhelpl nr)ne• LAJW 0Lo.).( e.-44°A; el k6 e~)vi* 0 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?jhelpl SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 7 of 11 C � d1� is c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? .. S -- (}i44 I d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: _ I.] none, L' JEFFERSON COUNTY 12. Recreation i DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?jhelpl r b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. jhelpl n O c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: jhelpl (\One, 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. jhelpl b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? • This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. jhelpl c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. jhelpl no vte, tfy:\ d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. jhelpl 900.AS to 451.4-<. ace. Pf;v - .,, once_. k fa Ne- ro8; S boj tZd b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?jhelpl no c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?jhelpl • O SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 8 of 11 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, str: in t it -p, iii n\ bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, g- . . 40 (indicate whether public or private). 'help.' n0 I SE4 I -J e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)waer, • -. transportation? If so, generally describe.f help.' JEFFERSON COUNTY 1'1 t DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?(help.' i `- S yid. l-rw „ r rt �,. . I#ring ro sN i . endunv S vA- 0t9 , tetti..44 6 (o4. r r,. 3 d g.Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. na h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: f help.' N pi 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. f help.' in 0 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 'help.' N� • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: (help.' electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (One. Seliti L)e0 ,ct-n:G �Ja,4u aft, a.ttcv t:0 t not pIvil I IA MI VrvI ,rtet.Ld Fsf" 4144 pfilut' b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 'help' (tier to C. Signature jHELP1 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyi k/4----1 g on them to ci n. Signature: Name of signee Position and Agency/Organization Date Submitted: 9/ c7/l II SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 9 of 11 r n_ _ ii,-- - LE-- C ri V E ,E= i , r-L-- r- en' tb„.... JEFFERSON COUNTY 1 I Li) II DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT efffilik FP Q 2 20 -2 14 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 situr,,ITY°Di•Fli'ljTY1OPMFNT e 360/379-4450•360/379-4451 Fax A‘T-011S1 http://www.co.jefferson.wa.ustornmdevelopment/ i _. 2.,..___PT Orc-0.,:"If,; Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MLA# 1 4**** 0 ana 1 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: 1-0,,,-ii DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,"'Imedium,"or large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITED Size of parcel acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. + 1 0 Size of parcel in square feet I ,/.!,`c ''.:6 sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and ion-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing,grading, filling, .....___ excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine mapleiiiiiiiibe such willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DI TURBIN ACTIVITY CONVERSION OF . 4 VEGETA ON ANDY. ME OF CUTIFILL , filled,Calculate the total area to be cleared graded,filled Answer the following two questions related to , excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert%acres or more of Construction site for structures (#)0 0 0 sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? — -Drainfield,septic tank,etc. C) sq/ft Circle: Yes ( 0'''') ,,, , \ Well,utilities,etc. 0 sq/ft Does the project convert 2%acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. 00 ' sq/ft .- l Lawn,landscaping,etc. i 0 Circle: Yes No 0 ft sq/ Other compacted surface,etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 13,0 CV sq/ft ' Out J Fill (culyd) [overj storrowetor cafe worksheet—REV 2/20t2008 1 r k impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,packed earthen materials, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) 0' sglft Structures(all roof area) sqf t . Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks . sq/ft Patios t_) sq/ft Patios '`.-`'. sq/ft ' Solid Decks `° sgft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) 0 Driveway,parking,roads,etc sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads,etc Q' sq/ft Other ` scot Other sq/ft r-. �,.....,% Total New , sq/ft Total Existing sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* so/ft *This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: `---' % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes f .No ` y,.. _✓ FURTHER iNSTRUCTiONS: If the answer is yes,the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. it,the answer is no the piempj is con ,+,,mg-d n-4 •r e o.ment and Abe attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements or erniwa er ma Bement. DCD staff will help verify the classifiication of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP) Best Management Practices(BMPs)Packet. .ioponeents of"medium"projeets those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through.# nd for "large" projects—those that radii meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are re• a submit a Stormwater Site Pier). DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rura resia-- r jests."`Coinpre a template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owes i of the a clod prop s . Cif t q f 1 t ( ' ,1/11 -12.-------:'''' ,' _„------- (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTAT SIGNATURE) (DATE) i...d € �' P �ie'«c'�E '9,*a..b 4 � > 4��5s.. '7, !t.,7iC.J, 'g�aa s r.t—a ,...i.,,,'..a 191". ' -``.' " �' ,t, `ti''. 1 . ... ..' ;. ''., ,? ��M..::�.,. r tt stormwater sale worksheet-REV.2/2012008 2 A 5 JEFFERSON COUNTY , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY �� �, DEVELOPMENT ,.ir,v. `' 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelooment Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd at co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning January 21, 2015 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA14-00071 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26, Township 28N, Range 1E, located off of Bywater Way, Port Ludlow, WA. Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by February 4,2015. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Anna Bausher CC:, \\tidemark\data\forms\F_M LT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 1/21/2015 y, 0 4.4'4 1889� STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 February 4, 2015 Anna Bausher, Project Planner Your address Jefferson County ` ` , ' ? is in the Community Development Department � " � Quilcene- 621 Sheridan Street Snow Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 Amu watershed Dear Ms. Bausher: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Richardson Land Clearing Project(MLA14-00071) located off of Bywater Way in Port Ludlow as proposed by Michael Richardson and Bridget Kaminski-Richardson. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): REVIEWER: Sonia Mendoza WATER QUALITY CONTACT: Deborah Cornett(360)407-7269 The following construction activities require coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit: 1. Clearing, grading and/or excavation that results in the disturbance of one or more acres and discharges stormwater to surface waters of the State; and 2. Clearing, grading and/or excavation on sites smaller than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, if the common plan of development or sale will ultimately disturb one acre or more and discharge stormwater to surface waters of the State. a) This includes forest practices(including,but not limited to, class IV conversions) that are part of a construction activity that will result in the disturbance of one or more acres, and discharge to surface waters of the State; and 3. Any size construction activity discharging stormwater to waters of the State that Ecology: a) Determines to be a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the State of Washington. b) Reasonably expects to cause a violation of any water quality standard. February 4, 2015 Page 2 If there are known soil/ground water contaminants present on-site, additional information (including,but not limited to: temporary erosion and sediment control plans; stormwater pollution prevention plan; list of known contaminants with concentrations and depths found; a site map depicting the sample location(s); and additional studies/reports regarding contaminant(s))will be required to be submitted. You may apply online or obtain an application from Ecology's website at: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater from construction activities and must submit it on or before the date of the first public notice. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:15-0282) cc: Deborah Cornett, WQ Joyce Smith,HQ/WQ Michael Richardson&Bridget Kaminski-Richardson(Applicants) Anna Bausher From: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) <Gretchen.Kaehler @ DAHP.wa.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 2:13 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE: MLA14-00071 Richardson Notice of Application with SEPA Hi Anna, We have no specific cultural resources concerns regarding this project. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best, Gretchen Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist, Local Governments Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Olympia Ph:360-586-3088 Ce11:360-628-2755 From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:49 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); 'Gretchen.Kaehler @DAHP.wa.gov'; 'shlanayl @skokomish.org'; 'rlumper @skokomish.org'; Leanne Jenkins; 'Roma Call'; 'crossi @pnptc.org'; 'stodd @Suquamish.nsn.us'; Keefer,Jared (DOHi); Pat Perryman; Eric Kuzma; 'bgraham @jeffpud.org'; 'Jim @portofpt.com'; 'David.J.Martin @usace.army.mil'; 'sepacenter @dnr.wa.gov'; 'sepadesk @dfw.wa.gov'; 'sepaunit @ecy.wa.gov'; rich_stewart@csd49.org; brad.martin @plfr.org Cc: 'charlie.bermant @peninsuladailynews.com'; 'njohnson @ptleader.com' Subject: MLA14-00071 Richardson Notice of Application with SEPA Greetings All: Attached is a reviewer letter for a proposed Stormwater Management Permit that will clear two acres of land for future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. Here are the directions for viewing the notice of application (with SEPA review) online: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/PublicNoticeHome.htm Click accept. Click on the files in folder MLA14-00071 Richardson. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER CASE NO. M LA 14 — CO Y1 1 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this jr'k U day ofY1 C 2015, I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed,true and correct copies of ti/\-C- ?1,1..64-(:C., LT-Le.- 0/, Al 4 .1_� �► ._ _: ! �.!*k IL • 14i S-.II.J v pi LA 14 -®CO-7 in the above matter, addressed to: ✓Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) Agencies: See attached list. /Interested Parties: See attached list. /Applicant/Representative-Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction, Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. /Newspapers (Notices Only) Official Posting Places(x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. fi EXECUTED this 2...1 .'day of JanuC , 2015 at Port Townsend, Washington. Declarant G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2014.docx Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: January 21, 2015 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00071 APPLICANT: MICHAEL J RICHARDSON BRIDGET A KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM WA 98325-9746 Application Received Date: September 9, 2014 Application Complete Date: January 14, 2015 Application Notice Date: January 21, 2015 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: BYWATER WAY Parcel Number 821265017, Section 26, Township 28N, Range 1E, located off of Bywater Way, Port Ludlow, WA. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on February 4, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner: Anna Bausher, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp14_Pub_U.rpt 1/15/2015 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) t' � 1v � � being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA: This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices. The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review. A wetland report was submitted as part of this application. This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. This notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the a/ day of_kjede, 2015. (Sign. • •erson posting notice) Si Subscribed and sworn to before me on this al day of )01lul0. 2015. Acknowledgement: NNNNNNNN To Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ` NOT residing in Pouk.Ls o , Washington. My commission expires:Ce+ocuctc f; aOi7 % PIM NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA14-00071 Proponent(s): MICHAEL J RICHARDSON \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcApp14 APO_U.rpt 1/15/2015 • > \� 3 d1< • . . . �� ! ' t \y� ` ��� " « /® 821265025 821265024 BARBARA Z CROW MUTUAL OF OMAHA BANK 632 BYWATER WAY 17041 LAKESIDE HILLS PLAZA PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9237 OMAHA, NE 68130 821265027 821265019 CAROL GLIDEWELL MARTIN C PETTIS DALE GLIDEWELL DIANE E PETTIS 766 BYWATER WAY 73 TWIN FIRS ESTATES DR PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9238 PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-9278 821265015 821265017 MICHAEL M LADD MICHAEL J RICHARDSON CATHI C LADD BRIDGET A KAMINSKI- 13701 SE 199TH PL RICHARDSON RENTON, WA 98058-7792 CHIMACUM, WA 98325-9746 821265018 821265035 THOMAS K LEWELLEN WHITE ROCK COVE DIV II BARBARA L LEWELLEN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 673 BYWATER WAY PO BOX 65141 PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9237 PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-0141 821265028 JAMES J MC GILLIS NANCY C MC GILLIS 782 BYWATER WAY PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9238 821265026 MARK D MC MAHON 684 BYWATER WAY PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9237 821265016 WHITNEY E MEISSNER ANTHONY J MEISSNER 743 BYWATER WAY PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365-9238 i i-................._ 821262008 ''., 821271010 821271012 i/ �_ ......._._.............._.__ ,. 821262010 J1821271007 • 821271011 821262009 ,-\ _-.a 821262010 ,i \`' '821262013/ I v 821262015 / ' 821265036 f ss \ \ ``821262014 ;,' N .../-1:321265007,,/ 5 821265037 �� ,.' 821262014 � \ ' / 821265006; 821271005 �� / �` ;' j 821265007 ,.• , \ 821265005 / i 821265038 �� 821265006 ''\ 821265004 821265035 V / / \ 1 821265039 821265035 f / \ \ / / 821264001 \ I 821265035 821265039 \ \ i �r /' V ,� \\ / / 821265009 / 821265022 `; 821265021 r v I : I 821265020 \ / 821265010 8212640 ' 821265023 8212850'18 \ 821265024 } \ 821265035 - A 821265011 I 8212 18 \ \ 81265028 , j 821274001 $'4128.'' , 82126550/ Ire; .,,,,,,,, ,,,401,...f.:.: a\�\\. f.,.._._..._ y �'u� �h \ \821264001 '° 8212 1�P r vv # tZ8vti2t �. I 8212$5095 \ \ i 821264C ■ j \::': 828O2$' `'1 i �, \V 821265014 \ 1 821265034 821264001 v v v v t 821265029 821265033 _._. m vv v 821265030 I -- _ -- - i 821265013 821265031 t ! I \\ \\ 82126 I 1 i'821264001\\\\ i \-,‘ 821355063 I 821355027 \ \\\ 8' !.. 821351033 821351033 ' 821355066 821355064 .' 821355028 \ 821341001 I 821355065 i 821351032 821355029 821351031 I 821355030 1 I I 821355061 —......... ...._.___.__.. . .......... �{ 82135503' I •821355031 821355035 DEPT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -Fr-7- 11 MO, JEFFERSON COUI\JTY 621 SHERIDAN ST. IQ\ o0 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ,!A . 9 „ 1‘7; 821265019 MARTIN C PETTIS DIANE E PETTIS 73 TWIN FIRS ESTATES DR PORT ANGELES, WA 98362-9278 X 9,80. N-Ps 1,INOS81310O9.1/11/15 FORWARD TIE EXP RTr TO SEND P E TTI S 54 SHIP VIEW CT PORT LUDLOW WA 865 -9557 RETURN TO SENDER 5,1R3Fs?$cki.t.3:4 844444 9 Zili"64i- azvadscivi , R 76 3 -::::11,.'04 Z . 1A Srt .4 [pi n� - - . r *IV '. _ ...wrx.. Optyle\OLCUin /A),A-13)67. 4, rip L-- p(.,. , (E), 01/I 14-? r 3e Fr 4' • J3 6 02 i h en - - L tc ,44.il rl Ji y'ry ',_� YU r. P Tow45-64OA 9 g 3 � T 99368243921 Illn 11t 1,J,1l1IHii11fll.1ju,llh,ll,sllIbiliiiilli,pllh ,,,, i Anna Bausher From: Legals-Donna<legals @ptleader.com> Sent: Friday,January 16, 2015 11:35 AM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: Publish MLA14-00071 NOA Anna, Your legal publication request has been received. Should we have further questions regarding the specifics of the submission we'll contact you to clarify them prior to the first publish date. Any correction or change requests need to be made by our deadline for that specific issue. We publish on Wednesdays and the standard deadline is 1:00 pm on the Monday prior,unless a holiday necessitates an earlier deadline. Those under a specific publication contract, your dates and times will follow those contract guidelines. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested,however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the notice has actually published and been measured. Generally our estimates will give you a figure very close to the actual cost. Cost is determined by the length and type of notice to be published. The 2015 rate for public and legal notices with the Leader will be$14.50 per column inch. Special rates apply to specific agencies under contract with the Leader. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the notice is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of the notice. As always,thank you for your business. We strive to serve our customers and their publication needs with the utmost care and professionalism. Thank you and have a wonderful day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)385-2900 legals@ptleader.com On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:28 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Please publish the attached file MLA14-00071NOA in this Wednesday's Leader for January 21,2015, one time only. The text is below: JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00071 APPLICANT: 1 MICHAEL J RICHARDSON BRIDGET A KAMINSKI-RICHARDSON 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM,WA 98325 Application Received Date:September 9,2014 Application Complete Date:January 14,2015 Application Notice Date:January 21,2015 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION:BYWATER WAY Parcel Number 821265017,Section 26,Township 28N,Range 1 E,located off of Bywater Way,Port Ludlow,WA. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA:This project is to clear timber from approximately two acres of a three acre parcel to convert to future residential use through Class IV general forest practices.The proposal requires a Type I review process with State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)review.A wetland report was submitted as part of this application.This project also requires a Class IV General Forest Practices Permit from Washington State Department of Natural Resources. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a)comment on the application;(b)receive notice of and participate in any hearings;and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368,(360)379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m.on February 4, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday,then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved,policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner:Anna Bausher,360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopmentl Please reply to this email to confirm receipt of request and intent to publish. Thank you! Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher(a),co jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. <MLA14-00071NOA.doc> 2 Anna Bausher From: Donna Rosmaier<legals @ptleader.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:04 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Your publication verification is attached Attachments: JeffCo D Prebill-137567.pdf Hello, Your ad has run, or will run as requested on the dates specified in your original request for publication.Any changes to the original request must be made in writing and reach us by the specified deadlines necessary to assure correct publication of your ad. Important: Please note that affidavits are produced after the last publication date and receipt of full payment for the advertisement.24 hours notice is also required to produce the affidavit. If you have any questions about the information above or any other legal ad issue, please feel free to contact me directly. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Thank you. Donna Rosmaier Legal Ad Coordinator The Leader 360-385-2900 legals @ptleader.com 1 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map Legend sC Raads ti — °2'2:8802' Parcels-Ii '2='='2G ° County Zoning CP MPR.SF Tracts 82'2t: Rural Residential 1:5 82'26802,. Rural Resident al 1:10 R urai Res+dcntal 1:20 4"• M PR Single Famtty 82'268:' El MPR-M un dam+Iy H PR Resort Comptes 82 26 8C:2 Parks and Retreat ton ■ MPR'Open Space 82'2680'8 Ru rat Forest Commercat Forest 82'268'28 In hold mg Forest Iea+ry industrial Aport El* tit tJ 82'2^!�:+ .7 ir M PR'Yaage Censer n a 82' AP 1:20 Ruraltluago Center c U7 ■ Resource Based Ind. 82'25,w:•= c r, Lint ineustral 82'288,2,21 S. MPR•Rocreal ton Waste Mgmt LPF 82'268j: is Lt'M Lt's: 82'268028 Crossroads-GC III Crossroads=CC 82'2C: im Crossroads NC ■ AL 1:20 UGA-U rban Commorcul UGA•Urban Liget!ndustral .., ...• -crrsar Co.sty Ceara S rece, 82'2680'r der r 26211 UGA•MDR UGA•IIDR UGA.Pubilc UGA-LDR UGA-Y+snor Oriented Commorcai MPR•BRN Brmnon CF-$011 R LO Commercal Fore. M moral Resource O.oray FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:42:59 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 , ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map , te . ' .� � \ � �� `\ 8212E6023 \ � • `\ 1 �- a'-- \ . 821265024 ,-Q. Legend ---'— Jc_Roau" l \ 8212E6035 p,"=/"* __-' 25 ( Shoreline Slope Stability - "=° u"^="� -- 622607 ' Interned ale # -. ` o u^"�°■� a � u"�=� o"���=" �" -------- m� El ".m able Oki Landslide ` 'u,ommm "�*� \ \` "P �� ■ ■ 821265027 I . . | / �="=� / _-_ ■, 821266028 ,. 8212650'4 i 82'2€5,:.e �� .7«�~~�=~*�����*.�Gu az��v����=A� \ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:42:40 2014 hnn://niuoerverfocrv}ct/oonu.omi.cnriousp.Esrinuap9ServiccNamc=ovozop&Clicnt\7ecuou=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. -0 821265021 I 21286082126t4'..: ) 7. °. 821266024 I 8212&61018 Legend JC Raads Parcels-H .---- Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas ;21266036,; .s 821266017 _. ... -. SUSC,UNK .F" Y . I I SARPA•SUSC 82/265026 '. rn I " '. •E SJSC a . I I SARPA 821265016 .W 1 I SARPA•UNK r :Y - 'r i I 821265015 411id; " . . . . :axled Lry,i._lfQw1 r_. .: _ i1 � ii211 1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:42:29 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map .•0 8.2'2i.-:•!:/:,22 O. 1 ---- "--7:" . , 821265023 .< 8212650'9 als' 11.1111MVP 821265024 - , _ 821265018 S JC Roads - 821265035 ---- Parcels-H 821265025 - 1 Landslide Hazard ,..-- I ...-- ,:I, a uses 821265036..6----- 821266017 - .„..----- High I I 821265026 . .----- .., .,, 6 Moderato „ S .---- c Slight C U1 ------ , c 91 -17 ..., 821266027 ..• , X . „ ------ ,' ,-- „ 1 ,---- 821206016 ..- ...--------- , ,L.-----4----------C . . •,, , f , 821265028 .' 82126501,4 821266034 II i ---- , 6 , -- _ -- __.....- d/ 821265029 rik, 821265033 kiz9r...:raw&Al 9,,...e.t..,..,Coxr;Co r.,St:,cv,GO 82'2,E,L.,YR:.:110=111■11==252'11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:42:17 2014 — - - http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 8212650A' 82 265.32.z - 11 8212650.20 -.%;- t ------ \- - < 821265019 .t it 1 ti/1":6 821265024 1 821265018 , 1 H e•Z,Lv_.'.!, s- ' 821286025 - Parcel H ....- - Seismic Hazard i 821265038_V-- - ,..- w E t 82,26b,026 , L , __________--- 821265027 _---- c t - \\ t . -- _ -- 821265028 .„..:1265016 - ,-- 8.e126501b 82126 .:'i rn t...1-- -,-; '11 ._ 821265034 — 1, ,.....----- ------ \ 821265029 es, ....-4.4, I I --- 82265033 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:42:08 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 821265021.------ $ .a_ 821265022 } _ I 6 •r m 821265020 yl. 1 821265023 $ k v; ' _ 3 t 821265019 tt 8221265024 v_a Legend #_ 821265018 Selected JC Roads Features 82'26 035 1 g 821266425 I @ Parcels-F. Heritage Points 821265035._ 821265017 821265026 rn -- 821265016 v 821265027 2 - i 821265415 t I _ T---- 821265028 ' u'2'it:-L43-.1 821265034 A ', ��� 821265029 0,1 82'16y:32 8'.4`n titer.su:ckd:r:.cexrs.ri Cos-e;Coca E.C....c:JS 82'265034. t FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:41:24 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 821265021_-a; 821265022 o- '{' _r 821265020 ; 7,% 821265023 • -_ < s 821265024 . Vi 7:11:: 4.,i 82126501 9-- - '- 821265418 C Legend r--- y ❑ Selected Features 821266036 ',, 821266025 i C, - ', ,-J JC_Roads Parcels-H r__r m - -_- [ I Soils-H 821265036.. —= cc 821265017 . 821265026 • w h. 4 c q ( = 821266016 821265027 Kffi i \\„\\:::\'_- 821265019 82t265 � 028 821265410 ' 821266434 � i I,r 821266029 trE °� .e 'k,1, Vaa:a-u:cYtii.r..,,,t._ri,._axc._c"ra r_..,«,GtS 82cYs543(7:/ 26211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:41:07 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 2126502' e 811266022 p.• 82f26S{72G mf i r 4, . 821265023 \ _ _ _ _ _ ----- y° Is. I 821265019 - _ _ l---- 821245024 S? � _ - - ; _ W1265018 Legs nc! ~� �} Selected Features 821265035 82126 i -s Lots �. JC_Roads 821285036 ' -•t`= I [" ~ 811265017 Parcels-Fi ( 821265026 �'i, ''1 - - s _ y 4' 821265016 ,,,-'1,.,':,'' �` ., '' 821285021 �'ti f,,\ - 1 (-- f` 821265015 r.ffr / '' ----71L I \ f �! sti ffi1265028 , .) \..../..-/-........- 621265014 821265034 1� _ ''c y _ ��15 $212655)29 � �r } I }" 821265043 4: 1� \I, so:clod trite+ :m Cosri Cc-r.-s SC,CM GO ?1'26M030.i \ '25211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:40:02 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ka • Til 1 'l pie ! { 4 ® `in \it. @F W t. L y 1 1 Nil i "Ii. \ I,82"28Y".23 1 M� F L y1 ';"!erg .. 81'26'.+(124 1 f 3 - �Bnd lit 1 82'26'_72'8 4 JC_Roads r tie�ti �7 LI. Parc els H 8!'1+s5i52h y, 1 USGS To 7 � 1 , �1 , I 82'2,85035 .V 82'2651.:,1 <� ar 2 L Ih1 ti I, 82•26Y.128 iig ��-'yy a n i d '�82, `1. fi 'I � 1 82'2185027 sit i r L� �+ M .�"2f8 ;?!5 1111) 1 k i '''..\"'"'V.L..s.....av —11\,..... koi,.,,, ae joi ti2"21350'4 • 82'165034 / r— ii .,..r-,) .ems mN, ~~ _r -+ r II 82'25!v.33 . 1,1a:r:.3'u:*Al:r..c�z-mxrCarr::Cerra x°:.,:�F9 82'2,+'_+22,-2 itv FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:43:22 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 1 E z HD cy r np z --I z � \ ii GI _ ..3. I: Z S s 4.4,251 1 ' = I 6 m m n R. D m G 12 a O S Cm F- 4z:z zzx tt 33 .8.5 44ga4G sa.ix E m eds�W41FS? o .EnnenEEEE zA: D + °r : »" c > A I I m I I 172 II - �= °�F�WS-=YSS..o S Z '1:.fx A 3,'r °$1�4t„° op �£ v:43; Fs x op = z s A6�,$`...,\ :..._,s, V".. gm° �`a y A C F q v C�qL <. °z°° o ill o N v c I Ili April* H ItSI A •14 iset )f-_, ,.., 7- a .. 1 ,_ ‘-\ vi a st }RR}} r !a= m S j�. '� Aim ;'a I A r _- SLS z NN "t s i� Er-°om N = ° s:1;,..\ 0MDOi� s 51 73 r A L mom +O.R' t14AS yy 4 4.0 - S \.... ''.. _ M EL mm° f ' 4+149' °S•�' a a { w m._-, o z t\s\ ^ ��� -Im°m D ,-1,-,,,;:mx� v1° .,sm� it Y R`4,7,17 O N51 i A #En a 1 zl i ��3.1+i0jEi & a`r. r 43 ylD fR+ mxN N.y 1_1'... pp.W V'x �..�w (_ a �,i. \In ft m 37 mm gg5 iii\` ti 4 1 ---•-11---''''.� / 3 ? // o < Pm$r° RI in I \\\\� � +' - r�i�� E 8 J // 8 D g= ,f,'!.. IRIS --- ..fie Nt.l /i-{ as+PV- ■ c �n",> II I.I R of aI �� �i s e / 14,,.-/ —1:1. C m L� I I cr yu4 i / ° N1_ O vm_ -�-1 yS . ``M m etl+ 3O0Y ° A 55 ',.f, i 0 1 fE t_ r,— k_, \ 17 „,,,,4„,,---A, -. 4 I R �m a y01 M' n 3.00 AO• ;.\ r / / •4 LI ..ir X 0 17 Z I' TI m 43, t m 2 o S ,3 / /' .. <4 z m a to.I•r1 E �' 0µM 3.M.0 \ � " e s�S•\ --I_ p -i,m s 4 C ;.7,-!§ so'•••1 r yfw . S J t� \ ,:°rj •s-= "s D Z L Z S m e 0'U.M •,...' sg 1rr+ ..\,\,,..,,‘�•� =X,g.°•_ n• _ 0 °r Zp I= 1 1".... 4 eo.uN 1/ �x w �—nI T v m D -i ill a15 ' 3.00. /-- 1�MIL ..f0C` y> m c ss IW sI _ R C' 1 T ° l- o >o-I m � e a m N v,P I I fr"eac 's i„-> z T ?C,t artil 3.io.soa x "s �� '"9 x isalf< C °70'- - 0) E�x” , ', 3.00 00 u t'"' �= 1 s M o.r— 1 (n Z Ti- —MAO a VV•Vt IN_ ++a s0..ie ,it 809.25(70 u r.54.6T t4 r 34 ,.-.r x r fe as x'ss..m -- T �S` w.OROC A6 SET 0'10 wrier 4 ; I R¢gtDLD IN VOL.ID.f>ea 63���— ; H C v o I L. 1J Ev ti y mi? Iril Z A i� E VIEW T E TRACTS �° I- Iw g o =a a�.��� e-�a:� sac, •' I p;v. S O V £ L S�°- 1 VOL.IO,Pll.l'Oi "A ° c' n II I' ? iE p i W m e 6` o ' .. xmmr I c " -Wit v • � off.. sag>?1oas,g 8 , — ��KOAm x3 gvli =tAr i "m b g 71nZ ��. `f n,rNg; A — o m�z '''Z �=o Y u9i .. I Dm. •m co. 2E GEF, 21n * a �: — mo m � w m o z 63Y$ yNZN Q°, � y S Oo G ; m A * 2 I . ,Wk' r5;'5 y 8 8 8 0 � $ -e N 2,,,,, (SE1/4 27-28N-1E) ���N l O, 821265035 41.% OPEN SPACE 7.61 a. LI tE N� v�'. N WrOU WO� ar0~ // / 'pOE * w re J m U /�-N -g ®� Ro,k I Hg . . �L ion I . tm. - _ _ _ .acs =o_ /// \tort \ \\ 7,?,As \ \ i \ \ 4 0� °° oti \ \ \ \ \ N \ r'a /� \ \ 3 \ '"°Ir \ ®fin a v ° // \ \\ tl:61\\\ V \ \ a$\ \ os�\ \ ®ip�i \ �gm °" / < os_N\ o a \o \ \ \ \ \ \ /nM P xku /j/ \\\P $ \�\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ ? \ \ \ \ \ Z * v // \ \ \ \ \ \ A — -- / e�N \ \ \ \ A rn U — --. PN: \ \ - N \ \ Z N \ \ !,...!..92 \ N m Wzm _TO � \ DU M w \ did d ` I°'N. \ -0. as 4■ — d0 p.. -T1 — — — odor mod --- ni b aaw mes \ \ `I / �� i i n —, \ \ � I C °'n�im \ 'A i �oti Pot Uo�\ \ \ �i� �9 �C' 1 -25 mp —\ / °o ®4 o . ------ ' \ cn <') (SE 1/4 26-28N-1E) 3d°6i O co tv 7J 00 00 N 0, N N j m N A — m D C ° u s N ti e ° D _ N IN \ °z N.) m Qj Zf N o• Z Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map L l 0 • 1i 1 (14 � 1 Legend - JC_Roads °�'.•__:2b ::. Parcels-H I _ c 1 kStyiZ? FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:43:46 2014 ill li http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• 821265021 v ' ®' $1"21i5n20.: ",1, 11111°1m it a2 ". + , + - JG_Roads Le nd , _____ k � - Selected Features (:w .:.'+ti 7 1k wr a+ Parcels-H Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 821265021 ' S2'26y122 5 1,,I,,,,,,.,..‹ 1 gy0-. 4j(7 }-'y = -, \ Sp ' 1' 1. , 4' 82126502© Ii ^ I ',. ', t. 1': {-�J- 8 1766023 , y -r '� } (J . f t IF �r. r $2t2660t9 L. I, 1^ i., 1/4. t(62,1265024 S!'1 l ti_( � v , • ''� I Yt '' r } t I __ t 82,2650,6 I '1 1 �' ', _� } �� 1 CI Selected Features I, ` ( 821265035 ( r-f, 26502v � ,� } '',I 1 /4/./ JC_Roads �t 7` f ��' 621265017 v' .. yso Contours 621265035 ,, , .• .5 ' j821265026 I d �f aO Fool Contour t u " 4, t' I to si 821265016 c 11) 'r 82: --255027 f / _. • T +1 � }I- r 15 1 t 1� :� 821265015 } f t 1821266028 '�-.~ 61265014 ^ 61265034 (` /- _ * = i I I f } 82126.5429 r 44 821265433 %, r f-^v ,' `^ ■1ss:rv.:dad a::c r-.'n Cart;Cr.-c .,a•:c,-,s:iF n 82 2o-y:3'.: 1y' FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Sep 17 13:40:44 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 9/17/2014 70N1 4-00 3C7 ) ) L,f!t 0-122)r-1 char (:)n Wdand. j 41,, ; 4 „,,e. ,1; ;11rIletict • November 26 2014 For: aet Richardson Bridget IternilisId20';41;4,esrds°rtt utey Road RI Chirriactim, WA 98325 DEC '''.C1 414 E s DEC 1- I , 411 .1., Ij 17.11 D" TY, 'TY U‘1,t T. • S S—r4f)- MARINE SURVEYS Et ASSESSMENTS 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 385-4073 marine.surveys.inc@gmail.corn Wetland Assessment for Parcel # 821265017 This report concerning parcel #821265017, located at Subdivision White Rock 2, Lot 5 Bywater N Port Ludlow, WA 98365 (Appendix 1) is a Wetland Determination intended to indicate the proximity of the proposed clearing for a single family residence to the wetlands and required buffer for this class IV Wetland. It is understood that there is already a permitted 3 bedroom septic system (Case Number: SOM89-00362) located on the upper portion of site. The following resources were consulted for this project: • Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington Soil (US Conservation Service 1975) • Web Soil Survey, National Cooperative Soil Survey (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (Appendix 2) • Hydric Soils Indicators Arranged By Diagnostic Features for Arid West and Mountains, Valleys & Coast Regions (LRR A, B, C, D & E; Supplement Vers. 2.0) 2014 • Jefferson County Unified Development Code Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas (as amended 2009) • Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Revised Annotated Version August 2006 Ecology Publication # 04-06- 025 updated 2008) (Appendix 3) • Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997 Ecology Publication #96-94) • State of Washington 2014 Wetland Plant List (US Army Corps of Engineers) Soils on this site are mapped as Cassolary sandy loam, 0-15% slopes (CfC). The slope on the property is closer to 22% so a closer study would probably map it as Cassolary sandy loam, 15 to 30% slopes (CfD) or Cassolary-Kitsap complex, 15 to 30 % slopes (CkD) (Appendix 2). All of these soils have a C rating and are categorized as non-hydric. The wetland portion of the property met the A4 indicator in the Hydric Soils Indicators Arranged By Diagnostic Features for Arid West and Mountains, Valleys & Coast Regions (LRR a, B, C, D & E; Vers. 2.0). Hydric soil is defined by the following conditions: soils under natural conditions, which are either saturated or inundated for long enough in the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation (US Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service 1985). This wetland has standing water for more than 30 consecutive days over the growing season demonstrating wetland hydrology. Wetland plant species consisting of over 50% of the total vegetation present, qualify as a hydrophytic plant community. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997 Ecology Publication #96-94) Sixty percent of the dominant plant species at this site have the FAC or FACW indicator for hydrophytic vegetation. (Appendix 4) The wetland on this property is a slope wetland, most of which lies below and east of the property on parcel #821265035, which is part of a 32-acre timber harvest area and was logged some time between October 15, 2011 and October 15, 2013. It was found to be a category IV Wetland, scoring 22 points on the current Wetland Rating Form for Western Washington updated in 2008. The score for Water Quality Functions was 5, the score for Hydrologic Functions was 5 and the score for Habitat Functions was 12. (Appendix 3) Using the Table 18.22.330(2), Wetland Categories, Rating Scores and Buffer Widths for Moderate Impact Land Uses the required buffer is 40 feet from the flagged line (Appendix 1). Only the upper boundary of this wetland was identified based on soil, hydrology and vegetation parameters. The bottom portion of this forested parcel is a patchwork of wet and dry pockets. The small, wet areas are defined by saturated soils with standing water and a hydrogen sulfide indicator and the vegetation consists mostly of FAC species with some FACW species as opposed to the dryer areas with FAC and FACU species (Appendix 4). The flag line separating the patchwork of wet/dry areas from the upland portion of the parcel is the actual wetland boundary. The buffer will begin at the flag line and extend to the SW. Based on our field measurements (Appendix 1) the area that is proposed for clearing is outside of the wetland buffers as required by Jefferson County Code for Critical Areas (#18.22). As the proposed clearing is not closer than 60 feet from the approximate 1/2 acre wetland, this Wetland Determination should be sufficient for the county to approve the building site as lying outside the Critical Areas buffers for wetlands. L )..1..: t- ...- r . •- ,7...) .- .-.,.4 c r. :-. o o r-- .- <r. CO(C.03•ct C 1.11 ..0 :i , 0 >, - , ,-, ' '''" i...,v"" 0 ((:11 F4'1 -:',N ..-:., er3 —....II ..C) C 'two, OO as cn 0)cf) -,-.- X 11/3Wcccc — -C D ry t"'s1 0002 ..6' .w (3 ,- 1-- ,,,,,'-'0,-jrn 1,.. -0 Z CC Ct) CO s1 1„,0 (,10 0 i vw ...... . (7),f)(f) ui ---cs * . ‘ Ira trs u')LI) (13 Q-. -'wi c— c g°,222 W a. c (13- a) 0 < 41 Li 4d E ti to• op o 0 he vt <cmuo L.'CL.-'tz'Cr: 0 0 ..._ tt--t) C).• '. C) , ' ., N (0 .-- (N CI+ 7- I C) Cr..' t,t * Cr) , t 1 ..,.....""' 4- CC 7r:1 Ot' 1 • r- ,AA' ,.,...,..- to0v* _I ,,, ... ......, [ z z t DI N e a 00000ES 006£O£S 009E0£S OOL£OES 009EOES 00S£O£S 00b£OES OOEEOES et N Z1;w M.ZZ 9£dZi M.ZZ,9E dzI N O `- Q a. aa�s e P a C O C Z Cl)N a z N p'p - >o _X U w .x, N z ° - r .o (� �w � .fi, . ' co 410. I.:4L'' I 1 g§i .0 o 0 o uo, II z U l� d o water WaY 0 ..,. _ "' ad 8 gx :. Q � . g . v o o e. 2 m w Z Z C1 M.9I,6£oZZI 1 1 M.9I,6£oZZI ad OOOWES 006£OES 008EOES OOC£OES 009E0£S 00S£0£S OObEOES 00££OES fl z 12 DS a v L vin 0 0 O E 07 ; N O N ni G1 c) m N.0 ° ° .3 Q1 hi a � � NCrSo d d.o cn a^ �� '�p "t c N W z 2 .ii 5.0 (5 ... W ' .di % u8i c`oo o _ a8 O 0 N 2 C 0 3 of C� o 00 , g Q o ' g g a 3 4 _� =N8 8NW -g 2 °'-= Q 20 18 ,_ e • O o x010 E O ` 0i2a' 0 c'' . n •C � y ..r O oF� N N ` N 8 U p f`0 M U O -Q ,A46 Z .� '° «N aoi 0g.2.2 a'5s z a g8 = c . t. Ea 0. y0 0 —=a 7 01 0 a'f0 3 C co N 0 a y 0 a > a co yogi a . mod. a.O- -$ a�i a aooE o -.�i 3 a• m E c$w ao m� ti) o¢ 5. c E m a an o c c a co001 >0 ZnE 5. .2 cy . a> o. 0 V, E 'E_ d2 �r� 8 8'v rnd m R •E o Q'-$� o — o M c 0 z gi, o.- o co p w m 0 w o vD co O Z •a z . � O ou) �7�m cn Y'i , �o .� = C Ti N W 1 ' $ 0 8 w N .3 E 5 = c o c o 5 45 o co,o'c Ca E 0 E 0 E d o 2 0 E¢ o 8i•a° 8'm z' o.g m a ,- LcE,5 28 8 v w5a5f0 o.1 (7, a-, ga, a LC d W C y co O .2 O o O sia�. o N a N o O 1 @ O L p a,g y W E O.N d E to V rd O.'°a .+ (J)fA fn O O N F- U O W W > Zr c/) o z0 to • co 0 cc2 2 to II m a Ci Fi C C C S ar al 3 : 2 73 p fQ d °.� B r z ton E ,g o w cr a U g 2 al E a O q 10 o U e t� Z 7 84 c S 1 ii W AAJ 2 m r g 8 � Z3- 0 r p �] Ge p .... �] 1 , < d m (3 0 0 0 Z p Q 2 m m 0 0 0 Z i < CO m • w t E100600000 Z 1 1 1 1 1 : i • • • • li m .2 c O ZL) 0 Hydrologic Soil Group—Jefferson County Area,Washington Bywater area soils Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group—Summary by Map Unit--Jefferson County Area Washington(WA631) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOI CfC Cassolary sandy loam,0 C 55.3 44.2% to 15 percent slopes CkD Cassolary-Kitsap C 8.1 6.5% complex,15 to 30 percent slopes InC Indianola loamy sand,0 A 16.0 12.8% to 15 percent slopes InD Indianola loamy sand,15 A 15.4 12.3% to 30 percent slopes KsC Kitsap gravelly loam,0 to C 8.5 6.8% 15 percent slopes KsD Kitsap gravelly loam,15 C 6.3 5.1% to 30 percent slopes KtC Kitsap silt loam,0 to 15 C 3.0 2.4% percent slopes KtD Kitsap silt loam,15 to 30 C 6.6 5.3% percent slopes Mu Mukilteo peat, BID 6.0 4.8% moderately shallow variant Totals for Area of Interest 125.1 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/9/2014 MO Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Hydrologic Soil Group—Jefferson County Area,Washington Bywater area soils Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential.Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation,are thoroughly wet,and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B,C,and D)and three dual classes(A/D, B/D, and CID).The groups are defined as follows: Group A.Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands.These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C.Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D.Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential,soils that have a high water table,soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface,and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group(A/D,B/D,or CID),the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas.Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/9/2014 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Hydrologic Soil Group—Jefferson County Area,Washington Bywater area soils Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more"components".A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity,e.g.,rock outcrop.For the attribute being aggregated,the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived,a thematic map for soil map units can be rendered.Aggregation must be done because,on any soil map,map units are delineated but components are not. For each of a map unit's components,a corresponding percent composition is recorded.A percent composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60%of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some,but not all, aggregation methods. The aggregation method"Dominant Condition"first groups like attribute values for the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group.These groups now represent"conditions"rather than components.The attribute value associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition is returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent composition,the corresponding"tie-break"rule determines which value should be returned.The"tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie.The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Components whose percent composition is below the cutoff value will not be considered. If no cutoff value is specified,all components in the database will be considered.The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the database,and therefore are not considered. Tie-break Rule: Higher The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent composition tie. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/9/2014 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 __ i APPENDIX 3 Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM—WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland(if known): PA 1ZC E L 'W' 8 Z f U,S 0 ( 1- Date of site visit: OM- Zo of 10/i}(zoIy. Rated by 5- 1\11C0 CE S M•A t ko s Trained by Ecology? Yes_yNo__ Date of training Zo t - SEC:2(0TWNSHP: Z 8 IRNGE:ME Is SIT/R in Appendix D? Yesk No__ Map of wetland unit: Figure_1_ Estimated size 0.5 ACRES SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I H III IV Score for Water Quality Functions Category I=Score>=70 Category II=Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 1r- Category III=Score 30-50 Score for Habitat Functions x, Category IV=Score<30 TOTAL score for Functions '�Z Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II Does not Apply Final Category (choose the"highest"category from above) Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HMI ChM Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland 4 Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope �( Old Growth Forest Flats -Coastal Lagoon. Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 # MOPED Nt4W WETLAND eM Nor CoNNEcTED 115 iNK 144=r1h4D Wetland name or number Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Weeds That May Need Additional l?'rote+c on N+ (In •dd tion to the a prot�.on' recommended for Its:category) SP1.Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2.Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented"means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands(see p. 19 o data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the ✓� WDFW for the state? SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local signiftcan.ce in addition to its functions? For example,the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program,the Critical Areas Ordinance,or in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Fo►w—weste,n Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington If the hydrology criteria`listed each question do not to the entire unit being rated,you probably have a unit with multiple IIGA1 classes In this case,identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply,and go to Question 8. 1.Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides(i.e. except during floods)? NO—go to 2 YES—the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)? YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2.The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source(>90%)of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO—go to 3 YES—The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface)at least 20 acres(8 ha) in size; At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)? NO—go to 4 YES—The wetland class is Lake-fringe(Lacustrine Fringe) 4.Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ✓The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), t/'the water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without ,..distinct banks. V The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO-go to 5 442D The wetland class is Slope Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 3 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number 5.Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO- go to 6 YES—The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO—go to 7 YES—The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. NO—go to 8 YES—The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT(make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10%of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90%of the total area. 11CM � t t e wetted .b g rated.. GMClas s .. Rig f Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional +Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional +Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under wetland wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Wetland name or number De +ili @11i � � 'A, QUALM NC a ndi t r tat th and .;o tc .,. . �v .4torg 5 .. ,....... .. .. .. ., �� D D 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.38) D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Figure Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=3 D Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit has an=constricted,or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently,flowing)points= 1 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q. 7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Provide photo or drawing S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) D YES points=4 NO points=0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub,and/or forest Cowardin class) Figure Wetland has persistent, ungrazed,vegetation>=95%of area points=5 D Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,vegetation>= 1/2 of area points=3 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area points= 1 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points=0 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. Figure D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months,but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is> 1/2 total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>1/4 total area of wetland points=2 Area seasonally ponded is<1/4 total area of wetland points=0 Map of Hydroperiods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 t I D D 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland.Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources,but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas, farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland multiplier Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL- Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2 Add score to table on p.1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 5 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number D « ' Points Depr�ional and Flats Wetlands Po :. YDROLOGIC.FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions;to ( Y I e reduce flooding,and stream degradation D 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q. 7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points= 1 If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing") Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) points=0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet.For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 The wetland is a"headwater"wetland" points= 5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points= 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 Unit is flat(yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points=0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points=5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points=3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 Entire unit is in the FLATS class points=5 f � D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above D D 4.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity,it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p.1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 6 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Wetland name or number Quite Tel Fie Welands point t W QUALITY I NCTI tS --IsivittlimthatiMitland fuOttins`t improve 01,4 lemo R R 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.52) R R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments Figure during a flooding event: Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland points=8 Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland points=4 If depressions> '/of area of unit draw polygons on aerial photo or map Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland points=2 No depressions present points=0 R R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the unit(areas with>90%cover at person height): Figure or shrubs>2/3 the area of the unit points=8 Trees or shrubs> 1/3 area of the unit points=6 Ungrazed,herbaceous plants>2/3 area of unit points=6 Ungrazed herbaceous plants> 1/3 area of unit points=3 Trees, shrubs, and ungrazed herbaceous< 1/3 area of unit points=0 Aerial photo or map showing polygons of different vegetation types R Add the points in the boxes above • 1 1 R R 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields,roads, or clear-cut logging Residential, urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels of sediment,toxic compounds or nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality multiplier Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 R TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R 1 by R 2 Add score to table on p.1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 7 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Wetland name or number dG too osio R 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.54) R R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the unit provides: Figure Estimate the average width of the wetland unit perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between banks). Calculate the ratio:(average width of unit)/(average width of stream between banks). If the ratio is more than 20 points=9 If the ratio is between 10—20 points=6 If the ratio is 5 - <10 points=4 If the ratio is 1 -<5 points=2 If the ratio is< 1 points= 1 Aerial photo or map showing average widths R R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat Figure large woody debris as `forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best description.(polygons need to have >90%cover at person height NOT Cowardin classes): Forest or shrub for>1/3 area OR herbaceous plants>2/3 area points=7 Forest or shrub for> 1/10 area OR herbaceous plants> 1/3 area points=4 Vegetation does not meet above criteria points=0 Aerial photo or map showing polygons of different vegetation types R Add the points in the boxes above 1 R R 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see pS7) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. There are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,bridges, farms)that can be damaged by flooding. There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be damaged by flooding Other multiplier (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike) YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 R TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4 Add score to table on p.1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 8 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number WA 'QU FUNCTIONS indicators t th etl fimtorato- , prove fated . , L L 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.59) L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore(use polygons of Cowardin classes): Figure_ Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m)wide points=6 Vegetation is more than 16(5m)wide and<33ft points=3 Vegetation is more than 6ft(2m)wide and<16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points=0 Map of Cowardin classes with widths marked L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description Figure that results in the highest points,and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover is total cover in the unit,but it can be in patches.NOTE:Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed. Cover of herbaceous plants is>90%of the vegetated area points=6 Cover of herbaceous plants is>2/3 of the vegetated area points=4 Cover of herbaceous plants is>1/3 of the vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers >2/3 unit points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1 Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover>2/3 of the unit points=0 Map with polygons of different vegetation types L Add the points in the boxes above L L 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water, or polluted surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland multiplier Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland Parks with grassy areas that are maintained, ballfields,golf courses (all within 150 ft. of lake shore) Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from L 1 by L2 Add score to table on p.1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 9 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number s t�� ▪ L 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (see p.62) L L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore(do Figure not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland) >3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=6 >3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2 m)wide points=4 >'A distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m)wide (any type except aquatic bed) points=2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=0 Aerial photo or map with Cowardin vegetation classes L Record the points from the box above I 1 L L 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (see p.63) Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions apply. There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields)that can be damaged by erosion. There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland(e.g. mature forests other wetlands)than can be damaged by shoreline erosion Other multiplier YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p.1 Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 10 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 A Wetland name or number Slope Wetlands WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland utut Amazons to ( Y i improve water9ty. 1 S S 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.64) S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit: Slope is 1%or less (a 1%slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft horizontal distance) points=3 Slope is 1%-2% points=2 Slope is 2%-5% points= 1 0 Slope is greater than 5% points=0 S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) 3 YES=3 points NO=0 points S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Figure— Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland.Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface(>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. Dense,uncut,herbaceous vegetation>90%of the wetland area points=6 Dense,uncut,herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area points=3 Dense,woody,vegetation>1/2 of area points=2 Dense,uncut,herbaceous vegetation>1/4 of area points= 1 2. Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points=0 Aerial photo or map with vegetation polygons S Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above I . S S 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.67) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualifi,as opportunity. — Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland — Tilled fields,logging,or orchards within 150 feet of wetland multiplier — Residential,urban areas,or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 S TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S1 by S2 5 Add score to table on p. 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form–western Washington 11 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number S Slope Wetlands Points HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS Indicators that the wetland un t functions to y reduce flooding and stream erosion ` S 3.Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and stream (see p.68) erosion? S S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fat conditions in the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough(usually> 1/8in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation covers >90%of the area of the wetland. points=6 Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland points=3 Dense,uncut,rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points= 1 More than 1/4 of area is grazed,mowed,tilled or vegetation is not rigid points=0 S S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least Z 10%of its area. YES points=2 NO points=0 S Add the points in the boxes above j 5 S S 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. — Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems — Other multiplier (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is a seep that is on the downstream side of a dam) YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 S TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. 1 -� Comments Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 12 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number These questions app wet er `l ';, S Points HABITAT FUNCTIONS Indicators rs that unit functions to provide important habitat per box) H 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72) Figure_ Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is '/acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic bed mergent plants ✓Shrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) ✓Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) If thit has a forested class check if: The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy, shrubs,herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qual ifr If you have: 4 structures or more points=4 Z„ Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 3 structures points=2 2 structures points= 1 1 structure points=0 H 1.2.Hydroperiods(seep. 73) Figure Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or'/acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 ✓Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point= 1 ✓ Saturated only 1 type present points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake fringe wetland =2 points Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3.Richness of Plant Species(seep. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species points=2 List species below f you want to: 5 - 19 species points= 1 <5 species points=0 Total for page if Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 13 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats(seep. 76) Figure_ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. Es 1 rD co) I ED ° EI None=0 points Low= 1 point Moderate=2 points t ION 4, \\...„........ NN ... .... ... ______ . /� [riparian braided channels] High =3 points NOTE:If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 1.5.Special Habitat Features: (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in. diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft(lm)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (l Om) Z Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that Piave not yet turned grey/brown) At least VI acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) ✓ Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat j 1 j Add the scores from H1.1, H1.2, H1.3, H1.4, H1.5 L.2._j Comments Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 14 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number H 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed." — 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 — 100 m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water > 50% circumference. Points=4 — 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>95% circumference. Points=4 — 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>25% circumference, . Points=3 — 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for> 50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(80ft)of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 -- No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points=1 2. — Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference(e.g.tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points=1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(seep. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs,forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES=4 points (go to H 2.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES=2 points (go to H 2.3) NO=H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES=1 point NO=0 points Total for page 3 Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 15 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in the PHS report htty://wdfw.wa.Qov/hab/vhslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(1 acre). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors:Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests:(Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). Instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report:pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). 0 Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 m(0.5-6.5 ft), composed of basalt,andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>51 cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 m(6.5 ft)in height. Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 m(20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat=1 point No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits)(seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating,but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other development. points=5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within V mile points=5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within%2 mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed points=3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within'/mile points=3 There is at least 1 wetland within'/2 mile. points=2 There are no wetlands within%2 mile. points=0 H 2. TOTAL Score- opportunity for providing habitat 1 Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 1 5 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions —add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on t 2 p. 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 17 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(see p.86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? The dominant water regime is tidal, Vegetated,and With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Cat.I Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? YES =Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES =Category I NO=Category II Cat. I The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II cultivation,grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating(I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a UII Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determinin g the size threshold of 1 acre. At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 18 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008 Wetland name or number SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.I Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened,Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WJVHP/DNR) S/T/R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site YES contact WNHP/DNR(see p. 79)and go to SC 2.2 NO SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES=Category I NO )X not a Heritage Wetland SC 3.0 Bogs (see p. 87) Does the wetland unit(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify y if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e. layers of organic soil),either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)?Yes - gotoQ. 3 No -go to Q. 2 2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yes-go to Q. 3 No-Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND other plants,if present, consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes—Is a bog for purpose of rating No- go to Q.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 1. Is the unit forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western red cedar,western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 2. YES= Category I No Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 19 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands(see p.90) Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches (81 cm) or more. NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80—200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat. I YES = Category I NO not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep.91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom) YES =Go to SC 5.1 NO not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p. 74). At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square feet) YES=Category I NO=Category II Cat. II Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 20 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Wetland name or number SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep.93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES - go to SC 6.1 NO_not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 Grayland-Westport- lands west of SR 105 Ocean Shores-Copalis- lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES=Category II NO—go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES =Category III Cat.III i a Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 21 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 ■ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site: tcJi. 0•1 is ... t'1 v:3 City/County: v- :� V/. r ''Sampling Date: ti i '. AppficeintrOwner: "i�, ,CiwPwwe State: t n Samples Pow • _ f ,vestigator(s): °l . xt'r C l Section,Township,Range: O to Landform(bNIslope,terrace,etc.): IN, l Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): Subregion(LRR): C , Lat , 4 Long:"" 127. ;115S Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: CL. ()Irv!-,I tion: Are climatic J hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no,explain in Remarks.) • Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances*cses*present? Yes No Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation nt? Yes No Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? . Yes No within a Wetland? Yes, No Remarks: 5 A '#;ft `ter, rat - 6 r ,£ a VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator ` ance Test hees Tree Stratum (Plot size: t 14 Cover Species? .SSt u N of Dominant Species 1. + t That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: -) (A) 2. r kiN�a C Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species -1 ' =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAG: (NB) leoftS rub Stratum (Plot Size: ) Prevalence Index teorksheet 1, N(-4't Total 2. \in re k n I rV vv' -� f O FMS specs%Cover of Multiply by: OBL x 1= 3. 4. , FACW x2= 5. FAC species x3= =Total Cover FACtJ x 4 Herb Stratun (Plot size: ) UPL species x 5= 1. ;rrt" . ' ,)v,y\ L. Column Totals: (A) (B) ` eA kA tAt. ).40‘ 11,,,, 4 v" "4$.1 ,. kr-^° ALA) Prevalence Index =BrA 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 4. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is>50% J ' 3-Prevalence Index is 7 14-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting $. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. JAN i ;1 _ _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. , •., 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Wooril-r Wne Stern (Plot size: ) 1. t a4 0° . Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No . `�, In Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:kr ; Y + t;`l #` t t .° N P US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point 44 rfik Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) , %, Color(moist) % Tvoet Locz Texture Remarks air cie `,, • 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depieticer,RIVI=Fteduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. rlocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix, Hydric Soil rs: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis°: _ H' (Al) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Histic Epipedon(,0.2) 'Stripped Matrix($6) _ Red Parent Material(TF2) Black H (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(PI)(except MLRA 1) ._ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TFI2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ,_ Loamy GlaYed Matrix(F2) ^ Other(Explain in Remarks) - Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ,._ Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(Fe) 3Indicnaors of hydrophytic,vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) �. Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix( 4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): -- Type Depth(inches): l ydric Soil Preset*? Yes No Remarks: r $ C; 1 LAI t I - C iA) i0"i HYDROLOGY Wetland l Indicators: Primary Indicators(mininum of one reauireds check all that apply) .s« ,.... nd Ira s.• •r - Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves( )(except _ Water-Stained (B9)( 1,2, Hi- gh Water Table(A2) iti .RA 1,2,4A,and 40) ' 4A,and 40) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(Bi1) Drainage Patterns(B10) _ Water Marks(81) Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Sediment Deposits(92) .w Hydrogen Suede Odor(CI) SaturMion Visible on Aerial inutgery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) _ Iron Deposits(B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ,'" Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No &r'" Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No L_ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: ? "i JAN 1 2 2015 LJ :Y US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coest-Olersiori,?, , ��., A,�P,T WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region ProjertiS te: ' O C.^. ";` .8 - 1 City/County:1 r Sampling 1 i (t x01 tpling Date: 4pplicant/Owner: in inqW PAC V,f. : a state: .t • Sampling Point: 4.3. '�P* ,vestigator(s): e n , ? r a Section,Township,Range. . Landform(hill lope,terrace,etc.): l A A:\,\. k.cype, Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): trfet Subregion(LRR): c-.. Lai `' �, Long:,. i r , t3 Datum: Soil M a p Unit Name: 'n. c,e\cunj ,et,r-,14 ke. LP vr, NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Cir nom`present? Yes V. No Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a nd? Yes)< No Remarks: .„K pi it# > r”=141 eke,-°' etserk VEGETATION—Use scientific names namesof plants. Absolute Domktant indicator ; DOntinance Test worksheet: ires,2rgto (Plot size: ) . %Cover lealgra a u1-„_ Mother of Dominant Sped 1. t r CGl 'P km That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. 'i e 4k f ` 1 r �''°� Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) d. Percent of Dominant Species � =Total Cover That Are OB1,FACW,or FAC: (NB) 3aolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) Prevalence index heat 1- tp (1 kit Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. 4 { k r0,4}Y t),(2..r tl t C(or 1J 6' 3. OBL sus x FACW species x 2= 4. 5, FAC species x 3 =Total Cover FACU x 4= Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) URL sPeCies x 5= 1. Pr-thy r='1 t 1.4 pc.. Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. te S urn, ' -fir tra. Prevalence index =BtA= 3, .) "t tvk ACto Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. "Pcs -.r t cl" s f"'n at'; t V C P.Ct) ` — 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5;' \ ;P C '\ 1"'"a t . t 2_Dominance Test is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ? 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or a separate sheet) 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10: Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 1, — "?r• ! 'tnd' of h ' soil and wetland hydrology must K'1- JAN 1 2 2:�� y �v L� =Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Y Hydrophytic �} ... r ITy it `r n')1 REN _ Vegetation Total Cover Present? Yes No 3b Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: x g IV', ipc rs d fir ' k.7„:,,e /t` ( , 1,Li g ;1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast–Version 2.0 SOIL - Sampling Point: *‘14. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvpe' Loc2 Texture Remarks g ti'atkIr 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletes,Rt Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains, -Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=AAafmc. Hydric Soil Indi cators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.)- Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) T Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 an Muck(A:10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) y Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Sck Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLiA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ',+''Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) s Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) .` Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No Remarks: -Y. r r j ,< ; i v yc HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators(minimum of one required:check all that aprshr) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ?'t urface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(89)(except — Water-Stained Leaves(: ) 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MYILRA 1,'2,4A,and 48) 4A,and 48) ,--"Saturation(A3) _ Salt Crust(811) _ Drainage Patterns(810) Water Marks(81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) .. Dry-Season Water Table(C2) - Sediment Deposits(82) Hydrogen Surtde Odor(C1) , Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) — Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(05) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C8) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ` Surface Soil Cracks(86) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) inundation Visible on Aerial imagery(87) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) Field Observations: c r Surface Water Present? Yes. __ No Depth(inches): (- Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes 14o Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: L' '� II JAN 1 2 2' 5 `4.1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and0rsest '1\,"[NT Appendix 4 - Vegetation Dominant Plants Common Name Stratum Indicator Polystichum munitum Sword fern Herb FACU Anthyrium filix-femina Lady fern Herb FAC Equisetum telmateia Giant horsetail Herb FACW Tolmiea menziesii Piggy-back plant Herb FAC Holcus lanatus Velvet grass Herb FAC Urtica dioica Stinging nettles Herb FAC Galium trifidum Three petal bedstraw Herb FACW Gaultheria shallon Sala! Shrub FACU Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Shrub FAC Vaccinium parviflorum Red huckleberry Shrub FACU Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry Shrub FACU Alnus rubra Red alder Tree FAC Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock Tree FACU Thuja plicata Western red cedar Tree FAC Acer macrophyllum Big leaf maple Tree FACU Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:30 AM To: 'Mike anb Bridget' Cc: Meg Amos; MSA;Soozie Nichol; Donna Frosthoim Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Hi Bridget, I spoke with Amy this morning and just forwarded the requested field data sheets to Donna and the DOE for review. If their review of the wetland report requires additional information I will be in contact. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:53 PM To:Anna Bausher; Donna Frostholm Cc: Meg Amos; MSA;Soozie Nichol Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Anna, Donna, I'm really hoping that you have everything you need. Please confirm. Bridget Original Message Front: MSA To:Anna Bausher; Bridget Kaminski Richardson ; Donna Frosthoim Cc: Meg Amos ; Soozie Nichol Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Bridget and Donna, I want to try to be perfectly clear with this once again. Meg and Soozie went out on site to do a WETLAND DETERMINATION to identify the TYPE of WETLAND and therefore RECOMMEND the size of the BUFFER allowed based on the TYPE of WETLAND. In addition to the original WETLAND DETERMINATION, we were asked to help the county with their review due to the tendrils of wetland that exist on the property. The 1 county thought that a clearer WETLAND LINE for their review would be much more helpful and expedient. Meg and Soozie went out to the site a second time to "FLAG" the WETLAND LINE so that the county could have a clearer picture of where the Wetland began, so as to measure the buffer. We have turned in the WETLAND DETERMINATION WORKSHEETS and we have also provided you with WETLAND DELINEATION DATASHEETS which were used to help define the WETLAND LINE. Those data forms however were just provided to you, DONNA and ANNA for your information. They are not official since Meg and Soozie did not do an official WETLAND DELINEATION. Whether those data forms are the old forms or the new forms, the flags would have been placed in the same location. We did not provide those data forms to you for dissemination, they were for you information only. Please let me know if you have any other questions, Best, Amy On Mon, Dec 8,2014 at 10:21 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher(aiico.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, The data sheets that you provided for the wetland determination last week are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Do you want me to forward these data sheet to Donna and the DOE for review or are you going to provide the current data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 From MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @Bmail.comj Sent:Wednesday, December 03,2014 3:45 PM To Anna Bausher;Amy Leitman Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Correction on the last email. Those sheets are for a DETERMINATION not DELINEATION.. Thanks, Amy On Dec 3,2014 3:36 PM, "Anna Bausher" <ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, Thank you for providing the field sheets, I have an additional request regarding them though.The data forms provided are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.Could you please fill out and provide me with the data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD i E I Phone 360-379-4454 An e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. li 3 From: MSA[mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Here are those field data sheets from Bridget's wetland delineation (parcel # 821265017). Please let us know if you need anything else. Thanks, Amy On Tue,Dec 2,2014 at 10:19 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Amy, I received the wetland report you prepared for parcel number 821265017 yesterday from Bridget. I have forwarded it on for review and have received comments that the field data sheets from the wetland delineation are needed in order to review the report(only the wetland rating forms were included). Please submit the field data sheets, or provide them to Bridget to submit, so that the wetland report and be reviewed. Thank you, 63 Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street* Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher @co.jefferson.wa.us 4 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this c-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 1 Marine Surveys Er Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 5 Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 4:52 PM To: 'Mike anb Bridget' Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Hi Bridget, With the holidays it looks like the soonest Donna and I have for a site visit is Wednesday,January 7th at 10:00am, assuming that time will work for everyone. I am going to send an email to MSA that I will copy you in. Site visits are a normal part of the wetland and DCD review. At this time Donna will be able to actively discuss with Meg and Amy the wetland report and the 2010 field data sheets that have been requested from MSA. The permit was submitted 104 days ago,the days that DCD has been waiting on additional information to continue our review is 71 days,with DCD having all information for review for 33 days. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embarqmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 22,2014 9:31 AM To:Anna Bausher Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets HI Anna, A few questions: Do you have a date scheduled for a field visit? Why do you and Donna need to do a field visit? Were is the county at for the 120 day clock and my permit? Thanks Bridget -----Original Message---- From:Anna Bausher, To: Bridget Richardson Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Hi Bridget, Donna and I are ready to move onto making our site visit. Meg from MSA had asked Donna if she could be on site when we make our visit. We would like to schedule a site visit with Meg and Amy and thought it would be good for you to be there as well. At this time Donna can go over the field data forms with them. Donna and I will review our schedules for when we can make the site visit together and send out an email to everyone to 1 1 ) see if it will work. Feel free to let me know if there is a best time to accommodate your schedule (provided that you would like to be present). Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Bridget Richardson [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 2:09 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Anna, Any news? Bridget Sent from my iPhone On Dec 10,2014, at 10:30 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher@a,co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Bridget, I spoke with Amy this morning and just forwarded the requested field data sheets to Donna and the DOE for review. If their review of the wetland report requires additional information I will be in contact. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr@embargmail.com] Sent:Tuesday, December 09, 2014 9:53 PM To:Anna Bausher; Donna Frostholm Cc: Meg Amos; MSA;Soozie Nichol Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets 2 Anna, Donna, I'm really hoping that you have everything you need. Please confirm. Bridget ---Original Message----- Frt.MSA To:Anna Bausher; Bridget Kaminski Richardson ; Donna Frostholm Cc: Meg Amos ; Soozie Nichol Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Bridget and Donna, I want to try to be perfectly clear with this once again. Meg and Soozie went out on site to do a WETLAND DETERMINATION to identify the TYPE of WETLAND and therefore RECOMMEND the size of the BUFFER allowed based on the TYPE of WETLAND. In addition to the original WETLAND DETERMINATION, we were asked to help the county with their review due to the tendrils of wetland that exist on the property. The county thought that a clearer WETLAND LINE for their review would be much more helpful and expedient. Meg and Soozie went out to the site a second time to "FLAG" the WETLAND LINE so that the county could have a clearer picture of where the Wetland began, so as to measure the buffer. We have turned in the WETLAND DETERMINATION WORKSHEETS and we have also provided you with WETLAND DELINEATION DATASHEETS which were used to help define the WETLAND LINE. Those data forms however were just provided to you, DONNA and ANNA for your information. They are not official since Meg and Soozie did not do an official WETLAND DELINEATION. Whether those data forms are the old forms or the new forms, the flags would have been placed in the same location. We did not provide those data forms to you for dissemination, they were for you information only. Please let me know if you have any other questions, Best, Amy On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:21 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, 3 The data sheets that you provided for the wetland determination last week are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Do you want me to forward these data sheet to Donna and the DOE for review or are you going to provide the current data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. I I From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:45 PM To:Anna Bausher;Amy Leitman Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Correction on the last email. Those sheets are for a DETERMINATION not DELINEATION.. Thanks, Amy On Dec 3, 2014 3:36 PM, "Anna Bausher" <ABausher(Z co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, Thank you for providing the field sheets, I have an additional request regarding them though.The data forms provided are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.Could you please fill out and provide me with the data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region? 4 Thank you, at Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, ii Here are those field data sheets from Bridget's wetland delineation (parcel # 821265017). Please let us know if you need anything else. Thanks, Amy On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Amy, i 5 I received the wetland report you prepared for parcel number 821265017 yesterday from Bridget. I have forwarded it on for review and have received comments that the field data z ' sheets from the wetland delineation are needed in order to review the report(only the wetland rating forms were included). Please submit the field data sheets,or provide them to Bridget to submit, so that the wetland report and be reviewed. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher @co.jefferson.wa.us [ pp [ S All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. -- v Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.survevs.inc @mil.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com 6 Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:51 AM To: 'MSA' Subject: RE: Site Visit for Wetland Report Amy, We can discuss this onsite when everyone is present so we can ensure we all have the same understanding. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.comj Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:53 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: Re:Site Visit for Wetland Report Anna, Let's talk, I do not know why you are asking for this. Amy On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:10 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher a,co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hello Amy, Thank you for being available to be onsite with Donna and I.January 8th at 11:30 works for us. Bridget,can you please confirm that this time works for you as well?Amy, as Meg will not be able to make it,we will need you to fill out the 2010 Regional Supplement Wetland Determination Data Forms for Donnas review. Thank you, 1 Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:52 AM To: Meg Amos Cc:Anna Bausher;mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com; Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Site Visit for Wetland Report Hello Anna, All things considered, I am able to be out on site and will be happy to review everything that we have done from our end if you need one of us on site. That being said, things should be fairly self explanatory, as the flagging has been up marking the apparent boundary, as requested by you and Donna. Let me know if you would like me to meet on site and I will be happy to do so. } My next available dates are Jan 5th & Jan 8th. Please let me know if you would like me to offer up more dates. I hope your holidays were delightful. 2 .. y Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law;including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From MSA [mait t :m rine.surve s.inC @gmail.com ] Sent:Monday, December 29, 2014 9:52 AM To: Meg Amos Cc:Anna Bausher; mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com; Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: Site Visit for Wetland Report Hello Anna, All things considered, I am able to be out on site and will be happy to review everything that we have done from our end if you need one of us on site. That being said, things should be fairly self explanatory, as the flagging has been up marking the apparent boundary, as requested by you and Donna. Let me know if you would like me to meet on site and I will be happy to do so. My next available dates are Jan 5th & Jan 8th. Please let me know if you would like me to offer up more dates. I hope your holidays were delightful. 2 Amy On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM,Meg Amos <mamosdamAgmail.com>wrote: Hi Anna, I am not available until after I return from Mexico on February 7th. Soozie and I were on site together. She may be able to make it sooner. Otherwise,we'll have to wait until February. Meg Meg Amos Marine Surveys &Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-4073 I mamosdam @gmail.com I On Mon,Dec 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: 1 Good morning Meg, It is my understanding that you did the work for the wetland report and wanted to be onsite when Donna made her ! ; site visit. Is there a different day that would accommodate your schedule to be onsite? If you provide me with a couple of different times/days then I can see if they would work for Donna and I as well. Donna and I believe it will be helpful in keeping Bridget's application moving if everyone involved is able to be at the site visit. s ' Sincerely, I � I Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 3 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. � ? r I i A From: Meg Amos [mailto:mamosdam@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 29,2014 8:36 AM To:Anna Bausher Cc:Amy Leitman I Subject: Re:Site Visit for Wetland Report Good morning Anna, I will not be able to attend the site visit on January 7th,but I'm hoping that Amy can make it. Best regards for the new year, Meg Meg Amos Marine Surveys &Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend,WA 98368 I 360-385-4073 mamosdam @email.com On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:30 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hello Meg and Amy, 3 4 Meg, you had asked Donna Frostholm if you could be present during the site visit Donna makes as part of her review of the wetland report, which was prepared by MSA for Bridget Kaminski-Richardson. Donna and I are planning on making a site visit on Wednesday, January 7th at 10:00am. We would like to make this site visit with you,we have invited Bridget to be there too. At this time Donna can review the 2010 , Regional Supplement Wetland Determination Data Forms and any questions regarding the wetland report I can be clarified. Please let me know if you will be able to attend this site visit with us or if there is another I time we might be able to arrange it. Sincerely, 1 s Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@co.jefferson.wa.us } All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records ° � i Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person I who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. € Marine Surveys ft Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 5 Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:14 PM To: 'Mike anb Bridget' Subject: FW: Site Visit for Wetland Report Hello Bridget, Today I received an email indicating the following email chain from Monday was not delivered to your email. I am forwarding it to you in case you truly did not receive it. Donna and I have rescheduled our site visit to January 8th at 11:30 am to accommodate Amy being able to be onsite. Please confirm if this time works for you as well. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Anna Bausher Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 10:11 AM To: 'MSA' Cc: mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com; Donna Frostholm; Meg Amos Subject: RE:Site Visit for Wetland Report Hello Amy, Thank you for being available to be onsite with Donna and I.January 8th at 11:30 works for us. Bridget,can you please confirm that this time works for you as well?Amy, as Meg will not be able to make it,we will need you to fill out the 2010 Regional Supplement Wetland Determination Data Forms for Donnas review. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA (mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:52 AM To: Meg Amos 1 Cc:Anna Bausher; mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com; Donna Frostholm Subject: Re:Site Visit for Wetland Report Hello Anna, All things considered, I am able to be out on site and will be happy to review everything that we have done from our end if you need one of us on site. That being said, things should be fairly self explanatory, as the flagging has been up marking the apparent boundary, as requested by you and Donna. Let me know if you would like me to meet on site and I will be happy to do so. My next available dates are: Jan 5th & Jan 8th. Please let me know if you would like me to offer up more dates. I hope your holidays were delightful. Amy On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM,Meg Amos<mamosdam @gmail.com>wrote: Hi Anna, I am not available until after I return from Mexico on February 7th. Soozie and I were on site together. She may be able to make it sooner. Otherwise,we'll have to wait until February. Meg Meg Amos Marine Surveys &Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-4073 mamosdam(&,,gmail.com On Mon,Dec 29, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Meg, It is my understanding that you did the work for the wetland report and wanted to be onsite when Donna made her site visit. Is there a different day that would accommodate your schedule to be onsite? If you provide me with a couple of different times/days then I can see if they would work for Donna and I as well Donna and I believe it will be helpful in keeping Bridget's application moving if everyone involved is able to be at the site visit. Sincerely, 2 Ex Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 �EE All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Meg Amos [mailto:mamosdam(Wgmail.com] Sent:Monday, December 29,2014 8:36 AM To:Anna Bausher Cc:Amy Leitman Subject: Re:Site Visit for Wetland Report Good morning Anna, I will not be able to attend the site visit on January 7th,but I'm hoping that Amy can make it. Best regards for the new year, Meg Meg Amos Marine Surveys &Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-4073 mamosdam@gmail.com 3 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hello Meg and Amy, � E1 1 � P 16 Meg, you had asked Donna Frostholm if you could be present during the site visit Donna makes as part of her review of the wetland report,which was prepared by MSA for Bridget Kaminski-Richardson. Donna and I are planning on making a site visit on Wednesday, January 7th at 10:OOam. We would like to make this site visit with you, we have invited Bridget to be there too. At this time Donna can review the 2010 Regional Supplement Wetland Determination Data Forms and any questions regarding the wetland report can be clarified. Please let me know if you will be able to attend this site visit with us or if there is another time we might be able to arrange it Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher @co.jefferson.wa.us 1 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person I who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc@qmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 4 Anna Bausher From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 1:50 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE: Reviewer Letter for MLA14-00071 Anna: Since our code does say"as amended",this is why I asked that the forms be submitted on the 2010 Supplement Wetland Determination Data Forms. Please let Amy know that both Ecology and DCD would like her to submit the wetland determination plot data on the forms in the 2010 Supplement. I will leave it up to you as to whether you want to let Rick know that we requested the forms from the 2010 Supplement, but that Amy with MSA wanted the old forms to be used,and that we will ask her again for the forms from the Supplement. Donna From:Anna Bausher Sent:Wednesday, December 10,2014 1:03 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: Reviewer Letter for MLA14-00071 Will you please look at Ricks email below? Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) [mailto:rmra461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:37 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE: Reviewer Letter for MLA14-00071 Anna, Thanks for this. I'm not sure what forms these are, but they are not the ones associated with the 1987 delineation manual. That form is found here: http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regulatory/pdf/delineation form.pdf I note that Jefferson County's CAO requires that wetlands are to be designated as determined using the 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology Publication No. 96-94 or as amended). Our Manual has been superceded by the new Regional Supplements. Does the County require wetland delineation work to use the Supplements? Rick From: Anna Bausher [ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:26 AM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) Subject: RE: Reviewer Letter for MLA14-00071 1 are the older sheets The data sheets used he 2010 Regional wetland determination. and Coast Region,but ' k sheets provided for the Manual.l requested the field sheetvsa;ys, Hello Ric , Mountains, wires additional elineation Manual: Western M Cor s of Engineers Wetlands D Delineation a know if Your review requires i have m 9 d thepfield data s Wetland Please let m from the 1 Corps of Engineers were provided Supplement to the was asked to submit the older sheets that information. Thank you' Anna Bausher Act,a state law Assistant Planner-DCD or for 360-379-4454 subject to the Public Records A Phone stem and is therefore subj person who asks to obtain a copy County e-mail system other state laws. the Jefferson d its contents to any P W 42 56 and to state law,including RC address has been received by the County must release this e-mail an production to the requester according All e-mail sent to this addr 4�56.Under the Public Records law om p found at RCS exempt inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also ra461 a ECY. _�- .._ � � ECY) mailto:rm From:Mraz,Richard A• 2014 8:27 AM Sent:Tuesday,December 02, To:Anna Bausher 4 00071 Subject:RE:Reviewer Letter for MLA1 Thanks very much. F rom; Anna Bausher LAS e�co 8efferson •wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, December :25 AM Richard A. (EC`() 14-00071 To: Mraz, RE: Reviewer Letter for MLA 14-00071 will request Subject: forms were. Good morning Rick, It report,only the wetland rating field data sheets were not ou once idrecehve them. them appears that the field and send them to y them from the app Thank you, Anna Bausher DCD t Planner- Public Records Act,a state law Assistant 379 4454 subject to the P or for a copy Phone 360- stem and is therefore subj e-mail system person who asks to obtain state laws. the Jefferson County ail and its contents tori hiding RCW 42'56 and has been received by the County must release this e-mail to state law, t from production to the requester according All e-mail sent to this address W 42.j6,Under the Public Records law found at RC inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt ECY) Lmailto:rm ra461 � ECY.WA.GOVI ROM:Mraz,Richard A. r 02,2014 8:03 AM Sent:Tuesday,Decem To:Anna Bausher 1A14-00071 Subject:RE:Reviewer Letter for 2 • a Hi Anna, Do you have any of the field data sheets from the wetland delineation that I could review? They were not included in the wetland report. Only the wetland rating forms were included. Thanks. Rick Mraz, PWS Washington Department of Ecology 360-407-6221 From: Anna Bausher [ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:25 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) Subject: Reviewer Letter for MLA14-00071 Good afternoon Rick, Please see the attached documents for your review regarding a stormwater management permit with a wetland report on parcel number 821265017. Thank you in advance for your time. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausherAcoj efferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 3 Anna Bausher From: MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:09 PM To: Anna Bausher; Bridget Kaminski Richardson; Donna Frostholm Cc: Meg Amos; Soozie Nichol Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Bridget and Donna, I want to try to be perfectly clear with this once again. Meg and Soozie went out on site to do a WETLAND DETERMINATION to identify the TYPE of WETLAND and therefore RECOMMEND the size of the BUFFER allowed based on the TYPE of WETLAND. In addition to the original WETLAND DETERMINATION, we were asked to help the county with their review due to the tendrils of wetland that exist on the property. The county thought that a clearer WETLAND LINE for their review would be much more helpful and expedient. Meg and Soozie went out to the site a second time to "FLAG" the WETLAND LINE so that the county could have a clearer picture of where the Wetland began, so as to measure the buffer. We have turned in the WETLAND DETERMINATION WORKSHEETS and we have also provided you with WETLAND DELINEATION DATASHEETS which were used to help define the WETLAND LINE. Those data forms however were just provided to you, DONNA and ANNA for your information. They are not official since Meg and Soozie did not do an official WETLAND DELINEATION. Whether those data forms are the old forms or the new forms, the flags would have been placed in the same location. We did not provide those data forms to you for dissemination, they were for you information only. Please let me know if you have any other questions, Best, Amy On Mon,Dec 8, 2014 at 10:21 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, The data sheets that you provided for the wetland determination last week are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Do you want me to forward these data sheet to Donna and the DOE for review or are you going to provide the current data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? 1 Sincerely, Anna Bausher ( Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 03,2014 3:45 PM To:Anna Bausher;Amy Leitman Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Correction on the last email. Those sheets are for a DETERMINATION not DELINEATION.. Thanks, Amy On Dec 3, 2014 3:36 PM, "Anna Bausher" <ABausher cr,co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, t � Thank you for providing the field sheets, I have an additional request regarding them though.The data forms provided are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.Could you please fill out and provide me with the data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? Thank you, 2 Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 9 E From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] ,Sent:Wednesday, December 03,2014 1:18 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Here are those field data sheets from Bridget's wetland delineation (parcel # 1 821265017). Please let us know if you need anything else. 1 Thanks, Amy On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Amy, E E I received the wetland report you prepared for parcel number 821265017 yesterday from Bridget. I have forwarded it on for review and have received comments that the field data sheets from the wetland delineation are needed in order to review the report(only the wetland rating forms were included). Please submit the field data sheets, or provide them to Bridget to submit, so that the wetland report and be reviewed. 3 Anna Bausher From: MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:09 PM To: Anna Bausher; Bridget Kaminski Richardson; Donna Frostholm Cc: Meg Amos; Soozie Nichol Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets Hello Anna, Bridget and Donna, I want to try to be perfectly clear with this once again. Meg and Soozie went out on site to do a WETLAND DETERMINATION to identify the TYPE of WETLAND and therefore RECOMMEND the size of the BUFFER allowed based on the TYPE of WETLAND. In addition to the original WETLAND DETERMINATION, we were asked to help the county with their review due to the tendrils of wetland that exist on the property. The county thought that a clearer WETLAND LINE for their review would be much more helpful and expedient. Meg and Soozie went out to the site a second time to "FLAG" the WETLAND LINE so that the county could have a clearer picture of where the Wetland began, so as to measure the buffer. We have turned in the WETLAND DETERMINATION WORKSHEETS and we have also provided you with WETLAND DELINEATION DATASHEETS which were used to help define the WETLAND LINE. Those data forms however were just provided to you, DONNA and ANNA for your information. They are not official since Meg and Soozie did not do an official WETLAND DELINEATION. Whether those data forms are the old forms or the new forms, the flags would have been placed in the same location. We did not provide those data forms to you for dissemination, they were for you information only. Please let me know if you have any other questions, Best, Amy On Mon,Dec 8,2014 at 10:21 AM,Anna Bausher<ABaushergco.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, The data sheets that you provided for the wetland determination last week are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Do you want me to forward these data sheet to Donna and the DOE for review or are you going to provide the current data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region? 1 Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA [mailto:marine.survevs.inc @gmail.comj Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:45 PM To:Anna Bausher;Amy Leitman Cc:Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject:RE: Field Data Sheets Correction on the last email. Those sheets are for a DETERMINATION not DELINEATION.. Thanks, Amy On Dec 3,2014 3:36 PM, "Anna Bausher" <ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, FE Thank you for providing the field sheets, I have an additional request regarding them though.The data forms provided are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Could you please fill out and provide me with the data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region? Thank you, 2 Anna Bausher 11 Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 PM [ To:Anna Bausher Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets i 1 Hello Anna, I Here are those field data sheets from Bridget's wetland delineation (parcel # 821265017). Please let us know if you need anything else. Thanks, l ' 1 Amy 1 On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:19 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Amy, 3 111 I received the wetland report you prepared for parcel number 821265017 yesterday from Bridget. I have forwarded it on for review and have received comments that the field data sheets from the wetland delineation are needed in order to review the report(only the wetland rating forms were included). Please submit the field data sheets, or provide them to Bridget to submit, so that the wetland report and be reviewed. 3 Thank you, it Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher @co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. -- Marine Surveys Et Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.com Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 4 Anna Bausher From: MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:45 PM To: Anna Bausher;Amy Leitman Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: RE: Field Data Sheets Correction on the last email. Those sheets are for a DETERMINATION not DELINEATION.. Thanks, Amy On Dec 3,2014 3:36 PM, "Anna Bausher" <ABausher @co jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Hi Amy, Thank you for providing the field sheets, I have an additional request regarding them though.The data forms provided are the older forms out of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.Could you please fill out and provide me with the data forms out of the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: MSA [mailto:marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com] I Sent:Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc: Bridget Kaminski Richardson Subject: Re: Field Data Sheets 1 Hello Anna, Here are those field data sheets from Bridget's wetland delineation (parcel # 821265017). Please let us know if you need anything else. l Thanks, Amy On Tue,Dec 2,2014 at 10:19 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good morning Amy, I received the wetland report you prepared for parcel number 821265017 yesterday from Bridget. I have forwarded it on for review and have received comments that the field data sheets from the wetland delineation are needed in order to review the report(only the wetland rating forms were included). Please submit the field data sheets, or provide them to Bridget to submit, so that the wetland report and be reviewed. it F Thank you, II Anna Bausher 1 Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 11 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 1 abausher@co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Anna Bausher From: Howie, Douglas(ECY)<doho461@ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:36 AM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Anna: If all they are doing is clearing the site, they need to meet the criteria I quoted below and not worry about the 65% native limitation. They do need to identify the dispersion area and set that aside so that is stays in native condition, or until there is a change to the way stormwater is treated from the cleared area. Once they propose the site for more development, you need to hold them to the 65% native/10% impervious values if they want to use BMP T5.30 to meet the Minimum Requirements for the developed site. The total area to use for the 65% calculation is the full area. They can't exclude the area they cleared from the total land area. You can be more strict than this, if you wish. For example, you can require that they meet the 65% native requirement for land clearing. Hope this helps. Doug Howie Dept. of Ecology (360)407-6444 (voice) douglas.howie@ecy.wa.gov From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher@ co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:06 AM To: Howie, Douglas (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question This is really helpful information Doug. I have one more question regarding this, in the BMP T5.30 Purpose and Definition "this BMP allows for"fully dispersing" runoff from impervious surfaces and clearing areas of development sites that protect at least 65%of the site (or threshold discharge area on the site) in a forest or native condition;"does land clearing to convert use,such as in this case,still need to meet the 65%forest or native condition? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 1 From: Howie, Douglas(ECY) [mailto:doho461(WECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Wednesday,October 22, 2014 12:23 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question They will need to meet the applicable new and redevelopment minimum requirements for the building construction without changing the land clearing stormwater controls. If they disturb any of the area previously cleared, that area must be included in the future stormwater calculations and the thresholds for new and redevelopment minimum requirements. It shouldn't change their ability to clear the land and deal with stormwater runoff from that area. Doug Howie Dept. of Ecology (360) 407-6444 (voice) douglas.howie@ecy.wa.gov From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:17 PM To: Howie, Douglas (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Doug, Thank you for getting back to me,this information is very much appreciated.The permit that I am reviewing in regards to this question is currently only for residential land clearing (approximately 2 of three acres which have wetlands in the remaining acre).The applicant has specified that the proposed land clearing is intended for future a single family residence, pasture and shop. Does this have an impact on the required two bullet points provided below? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Howie, Douglas(ECY) [mailto:doho461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Wednesday,October 22, 2014 12:01 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc:Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Anna: In reading BMP T5.30 as it applies to Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs you do not have to meet all the limitations in the Applications and Limitations for Residential Projects of BMP T5.30, if the project consists solely of land clearing. If that is all they do on the project (and they are not trying to do 2 clearing today and apply for a building permit in a year) then all that is required is the two bullets as copied below: Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs The runoff from cleared areas that are comprised of bare soil,non-native landscaping,lawn, and/or pasture of up to 25 feet in flow path length can be considered to be "fully dispersed" if it is dispersed through at least 25 feet of native vegetation in accordance with the following criteria: 1. The topography of the non-native pervious surface must be such that runoff will not concentrate prior to discharge to the dispersal area. 2. Slopes within the dispersal area should be no steeper than 15%. If the width of the non-native pervious surface is greater than 25 feet, the vegetated flowpath segment must be extended 1 foot for every 3 feet of width beyond 25 feet up to a maximum width of 250 feet. By width in the last sentence, we mean the flow path through the cleared area. The cleared area can be unlimited in length (perpendicular to the flow path). If you have any more questions, please contact me at the email or phone number below. Doug Howie Dept. of Ecology (360)407-6444 (voice) douglas.howie@ecy.wa.gov From: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:30 AM To: Howie, Douglas (ECY) Subject: FW: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Importance: High Hi Doug-I think you answered her question and sent me an email. Did you keep it? I thought I had sent her the response, but evidently not.Sorry to trouble you!! Deborah From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher©co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:23 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Deborah, I am just checking in to see if there has been any information regarding my question below? Thank you! Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 3 From:Cornett, Deborah (ECY) [mailto:DCOR461@ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Tuesday, October 07,2014 4:28 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Okay- I will need to get back to you tomorrow. Before I give you an answer, I wanted to check with our engineers,you will hear from me as early as possible. A construction stormwater permit is required for the project,which will manage the short term stormwater issues. Thanks!!Deborah From: Anna Bausher[mailto:ABausher@@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:04 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Deborah, The proposed clearing is approximately 2 acres on approximately 3 acre lot,which includes large portion of wetlands. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Cornett, Deborah (ECY) [mailto:DCOR461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Tuesday, October 07,2014 3:42 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Anna-is this project one acre or more? Deborah From: Anna Bausher[mailto:ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, October 07, 2014 3:33 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Good afternoon Deborah, I am a planner with Jefferson County and have a question regarding BMP T5.30 in the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. I believe that you are the correct person for me to ask my question to, if not could you please direct me to the correct person? I am currently reviewing a permit application for residential land clearing,the applicant is proposing to use BMP T5.30 for stormwater management. I would like to verify that I am understanding this BMP correctly in that the applicant must fully meet all applicable standards of the BMP; not just the standards under the 4 bullet point of Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs that is within this BMP?When looking on the first page of the BMP(5-30) under Purpose and Definition and the bullet points indicating they are Applications and Limitations for Residential Projects, and I am interpreting that the applicant must still meet all of these standards that are applicable within these bullet points.Specifically,that the applicant must still protect 65%of the site in a forest or native condition,which does not include wetlands,streams and lakes,even if these standards are not listed under the Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs bullet. I apologize for the lengthy question, please let me know if I can clarify in anyway. I appreciate your time and any information that you can provide to me. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street*Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausherAco.j efferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 5 Anna Bausher From: Howie, Douglas(ECY)<doho461@ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:23 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question They will need to meet the applicable new and redevelopment minimum requirements for the building construction without changing the land clearing stormwater controls. If they disturb any of the area reviousl cleared, that area must be included in the future stormwater calculations and p Y the thresholds for new and redevelopment minimum requirements. It shouldn't change their ability to clear the land and deal with stormwater runoff from that area. Doug Howie Dept. of Ecology (360)407-6444 (voice) douglas.howie@ecy.wa.gov From: Anna Bausher[mailto:ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:17 PM To: Howie, Douglas (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Doug, Thank you for getting back to me,this information is very much appreciated.The permit that I am reviewing in regards to this question is currently only for residential land clearing(approximately 2 of three acres which have wetlands in the remaining acre).The applicant has specified that the proposed land clearing is intended for future a single family residence, pasture and shop. Does this have an impact on the required two bullet points provided below? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson.County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Howie, Douglas(ECY) Imailto:doho461@ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Wednesday,October 22,2014 12:01 PM To:Anna Bausher Cc:Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Anna: 1 In reading BMP T5.30 as it applies to Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs you do not have to meet all the limitations in the Applications and Limitations for Residential Projects of BMP T5.30, if the project consists solely of land clearing. If that is all they do on the project (and they are not trying to do clearing today and apply for a building permit in a year) then all that is required is the two bullets as copied below: Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs The runoff from cleared areas that are comprised of bare soil,non-native landscaping,lawn, and/or pasture of up to 25 feet in flow path length can be considered to be "fully dispersed" if it is dispersed through at least 25 feet of native vegetation in accordance with the following criteria: 1. The topography of the non-native pervious surface must be such that runoff will not concentrate prior to discharge to the dispersal area. 2. Slopes within the dispersal area should be no steeper than 15%. If the width of the non-native pervious surface is greater than 25 feet,the vegetated flowpath segment must be extended 1 foot for every 3 feet of width beyond 25 feet up to a maximum width of 250 feet. By width in the last sentence, we mean the flow path through the cleared area. The cleared area can be unlimited in length (perpendicular to the flow path). If you have any more questions, please contact me at the email or phone number below. Doug Howie Dept. of Ecology (360) 407-6444 (voice) douglas.howie @ecv.wa.gov From: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:30 AM To: Howie, Douglas(ECY) Subject: FW: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Importance: High Hi Doug-I think you answered her question and sent me an email. Did you keep it? I thought I had sent her the response, but evidently not.Sorry to trouble you!! Deborah From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent:Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:23 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Deborah, I am ? a just checking in to see if there has been any information regarding my question below. g g Yq Thank you! Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 2 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Cornett, Deborah (ECY) [mailto:DCOR461 @ ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Tuesday,October 07, 2014 4:28 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Okay-I will need to get back to you tomorrow. Before I give you an answer, I wanted to check with our engineers,you will hear from me as early as possible. A construction stormwater permit is required for the project,which will manage the short term stormwater issues. Thanks!!Deborah From: Anna Bausher [mail to:ABausher@)co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:04 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: RE: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Deborah, The proposed clearing is approximately 2 acres on approximately 3 acre lot,which includes large portion of wetlands. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Cornett, Deborah(ECY) [mailto:DCOR461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent:Tuesday, October 07,2014 3:42 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE:Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Hi Anna-is this project one acre or more? Deborah From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 3:33 PM To: Cornett, Deborah (ECY) Subject: Stormwater BMP T5.30 Question Good afternoon Deborah, I am a planner with Jefferson County and have a question regarding BMP T5.30 in the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. I believe that you are the correct person for me to ask my question to, if not could you please 3 direct me to the correct person? I am currently reviewing a permit application for residential land clearing,the applicant is proposing to use BMP T5.30 for stormwater management. I would like to verify that I am understanding this BMP correctly in that the applicant must fully meet all applicable standards of the BMP; not just the standards under the bullet point of Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs that is within this BMP?When looking on the first page of the BMP(5-30) under Purpose and Definition and the bullet points indicating they are Applications and Limitations for Residential Projects, and I am interpreting that the applicant must still meet all of these standards that are applicable within these bullet points.Specifically,that the applicant must still protect 65%of the site in a forest or native condition,which does not include wetlands, streams and lakes,even if these standards are not listed under the Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs bullet. I apologize for the lengthy question, please let me know if I can clarify in anyway. I appreciate your time and any information that you can provide to me. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street*Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausherAco jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 4 Figure 30.91T.054B Threshold Discharge Areas (SCC 30.91T-0548) "Threshold discharge area"is an on-site area draining to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one-quarter mile Project Site with a Single Project Site with Multiple Project Site with Multiple Natural Discharge and a Natural Discharges and a Natural Discharges and Single Threshold Single Threshold Multiple Threshold Discharge Area Discharge Area Discharge Areas :,......, , : varuraL: ::::i '.'.0: NaLiaFal Natu ra , Natural.,...,:.:::. al Di harg ` :: a ' ,' _Di h Aieii4:6e � ' "`dAs ar2 ge ,� , ,--• CQ TgY:,_ ....D isc a rg e_., >:: THRESHOLD DISCHARGE ;';;THREE Ham:;;;: THRESHOLD; THRESHOL AREA:::: :::.:::;;DISCH RGEy: DISCHARGE; DISCHARGE < tadedj -:`:--'- AR A ,-'":fi EA:1:::::::: ARE*2-- - . :.: \(Sha iedy': Shaded ,/ i, ;. • , t::..;•::••: �\ •:1'1 1 !�Natural --, 1 ' 1 ' ' Discharge ' Natural ; ' Natural �•' Location 1 Discharge ; ' Discharge • ' Location ; •' Location 1 1 I • 1 ; • I 1 1 • • • • 1 , 1 • 1 ; 1 1 1 , • •1 • 1 • , I • • 1 ! •, ! 1 , 1 1 I • 1 ! • Y4 Mile Downstream \• '• :� (shortest flow path)____ %r- 1 i i S:\CSC\Document Warehouse\FORMS\Current Forms\NPDES Updates\Threshold Discharge Area.docx EFF:9-30-10 IOW �� Y JEFFERSON COUNTY `� - _ ' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT !1i 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co,jefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelooment Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd ac co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning December 1, 2014 Dear RoierCer, r� /�, M ra Z RE: MLA14-00071 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT WITH SEPA CLEARING APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRES OF A 3 ACRE PARCEL OF TIMBER FOR FUTURE SFR THROUGH CLASS IV GENERAL FOREST PRACTICES This proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: WHITE ROCK COE TRACTS DIV II TRACT 5 W/PTN OS V10/P105 Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by December 15, 2014. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Anna Bausher cc:, \\tidemark\data\forms\F_M LT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 12/1/2014 o-0 - ON c JEFFERSON COUNTY . 0,4 0 G°" - DEPARTMENT of O M LO ' A 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.cajefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment ; 11,16,.co� Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email: dcd(a,co.jefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Deietopment Casistency Review I Long Range Planning; Customer Assistance Meeting (CAM) Form Office Use Only Your Coach: ,' p; i -, Phone: r. Today's Date: 4- ( ,f_ f t_{ Email: P Walk-In: Parcel Number(s): 1' :._1 -7 Time Tracking .) Plat: Minutes Zoning: t;; �. 1 , .� g� � { Research Notes: Meeting , vYAt�„i�' •,4-1(..,-,c , }° _ C 1 Start Time 1 C •,,1't el(.� [;t.,i'-1't i t- C' t 4 r ._ . 1 Time � End Total Due ti r , (,'f.-- '-- , Paid' ? ,,,c,, it _-1. j k, iJ 1'' ! l ✓./ fr l ;14i'l1 ' ( i ttax,,/lF'G i -t"' 1f'-''`, ‘` 1 a•(, i `Y (If' C+'I / ��` t,-(,-7f-.3 i a tr yl 4t {( -\ii. �- 0i , t f -,; , i i, _w_ x'11 ,,,_ �. �_ r•- y 1 ,yi "`•ice._ {,..... i„./r v �9 i' ;,) `, v rf t , c,„.. L ' _. 11/1 ( 1 :, ,' ( "" 1 !r i r r w;, l� � v 1 i ',�a '), w f, ' i `s _,� l L- �� �,.. A,ir I t- t , iu t �� i t ;e _ �X- r '" ✓3 /' - '' . /7✓I ' N.� t'�1 �� I s d f ',-k-L ( m r f ,, X_ ; ' r _. . u t t 't 1, ri t PLEASE NOTE: Information and guidance provided through Customer Assistance is advisory only and is based on information provided by the customer. It is impossible for the meeting to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues.Any discussion or information provided shall not bin , or prohibit the County's future implementation or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes,laws,regulations, land use plans, and other requirements. Friday, February 14,2014 Customer Assistance - CAM Findings Page F 43 o c Additional Information: I 71H ) 14 ; .-b Ci lret r- )- e..r- ,. e itiltbe-i-mil laiziel (51PAitridei ) d 5-12,K In1/c tk'L fait 615-, F, 5-56,Emf r5-1 ' jc- b0) : 13/0,0...- 191 q 4- sic/ Based on the information you have provided here are the issues you should be aware of: h , l 1' >C/ / 90.,tk-..14.4 Shoreline Environment Designations (SEDs and Critica Areas (CAs) can be viewed on Jefferson County's online GIS mapping system (jMAP).The SED and CA maps serve only as a general guide to alert the viewer to the possible loca- tion and extent of such features. These maps should not to be relied upon exclusively to establish the presence, ab- sence or boundaries of a shoreline or critical area, or to determine whether all of the elements necessary to identify an area as a shoreline critical area are present. Conditions in the field control and other resource agencies may make the final determination. In the event of a conflict between the information shown on the maps and information resulting from field investigations, the latter shall prevail. The following Shoreline and/or Critical Area considerations are mapped on your parcel: Stream Shoreline Slope Stability FWHCA FEMA Shoreline Designation Channel Migration t; 5". . Wetland ti / Geological Archeology Potential Issues Notes. l , .4 v c. Process: y i "ff i ; � 'i ./.„--'`�`� Handouts supplied to applicant PLEASE NOTE: Information and guidance provided through Customer Assistance is advisory only and is based on information provided by the customer. It is impossible for the meeting to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues.Any discussion or information provided shall not bind or prohibit the County's future implementation or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County. state and federal codes,laws,regulations,land use plans,and other requirements. �SO� C0 JEFFERSON COUNTY G DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street 1 Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment ``'rsH ° Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451.1 Email:dcd(a.co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center 1 Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review!Long Range Planning l Custome r Assistance Meeting Form Office Use Only Your Coach:Colleen Phone: Email: Today's Date:06/12/2014 Walk-In: Parcel Number(s):821265017 Time Tracking Zoning:RR 1:5 Plat: IS Minutes Research Notes: Meeting Wetland delineation will be required for a building permit within 275 feet of Start Time wetland boundary. Submit the delineation with the building permit application If the consultant identifies a 60 foot buffer and the proposed building 200 feet away End Time from delineated wetland boundary verification by the JC will not be required. Total Due Paid If proposed clearing is greater than 10,000 sq feet a stormwater with SEPA or COHP will be required if an application is not submitted a 6 year for all development will be placed on the parcel. Check with DNR if a FPA will be required. n D" 3 It I1 (V. 51 ,.:..-0 w n m cc . a\ C) PLEASE NOTE: Information and guidance provided through Customer Assistance is advisory only and is based on information provided by then customer. It is impossible for the meeting to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues.Any discussion or information provided shall not bin or prohibit the County's future implementation or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations.No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County. state and federal codes,laws,regulations.land use plans,and other requirements. Wednesday,February 19,2014 • 4. Anna Bausher From: MSA<marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 4:50 PM To: Bridget Richardson Subject: Re: Clarifying question regarding wetlands Thanks Bridget, yep David never likes to say much. However, the question then is, do you plan on asking for a buffer reduction, or encroach upon the buffer? If not, that a determination will do. A much simpler, cheaper and swifter process. Please let us know if that sounds like your plan? You may want to see what you will be required to do (a determination and wetland rating) before you decide if you are going to ask for a "buffer reduction". Amy On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bridget Richardson<mikeandbridgetr@embargmail.com>wrote: Amy, see below string of emails and attachments and let me know if this answers your question. Thanks, Bridget Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "David W. Johnson" <djohnson @co.jefferson.wa.us> Date: May 30, 2014 at 3:54:39 PM PDT To: "mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com" <mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Cc: Colleen Zmolek<CZmolek @co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: FW: Clarifying question regarding wetlands See the attached. If the biologist has submitted delineations to Jeffco before, they will know what we require. Original Message From: Sally Ellis Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 1:18 PM To: David W. Johnson; Colleen Zmolek Subject: FW: Clarifying question regarding wetlands 9 Original Message From: Bridget Richardson [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 30,2014 12:55 PM To: #dcd Subject: Re: Clarifying question regarding wetlands 1 w } 77 Hi- I met with Donna on April 22. We discussed a parcel that my husband and I are hoping to purchase and build a home on. Donna said that I will need to do a wetland study to determine if there are wetlands and determine the buffers of those wetlands. I have a wetlands biologist ready to do the study on Wednesday June 4. Exactly what what is it that Donna needs(what am I hiring this wetlands biologist to do, exactly)? Is there a form they need to fill out? Or a checklist they need to do? Thank you, Bridget Kaminski-Richardson Sent from my iPhone Marine Surveys & Assessments Email: marine.surveys.inc @gmail.corn Web: marinesurveysandassessments.corn Office: 360 385-4073 Cell: 360 301-0262 2 Anna Bausher From: Meg Amos<mamosdam @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:47 PM To: Bridget Richardson Cc: Amy Leitman; Soozie Nichol Subject: Kaminski Wetland Rating Form Attachments: Kaminski Wetland Determination.doc; Kaminski Wetland Rating Form.pdf; Kaminski Natural Heritage Wetland Area.webarchive Hi Bridget, Your map seems to be pretty accurate. I am attaching the Wetland Rating form that is required by the County to go along with your map. We did not have a GPS, so you can use your map as figure 1 to go with the form. I'm also attaching a copy of the map that shows the Natural Heritage Wetland area,which is not attached to your property. Meg Meg Amos Marine Surveys &Assessments 521 Snagstead Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-4073 mamosdam@cmail.com 1 . . Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:10 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Hi Anna, Regarding wetlands: We are not going to be encroaching on the designated wetland or its 60 ft buffer. I read 8.22.450(1)meaning that a wetland delineation report is not required. Please explain to me how am I reading this wrong? 8.22.450 Wetland delineation report. (1) General. This report shall be required when a proposed development encroaches upon a designated wetland or its buffer, and shall be used to identify the boundaries and classification of the designated wetland. Thanks, Bridget Original Message nne Ef. f ,} t ,. 5 , I xvP To: Mike anb Bridget Sent:Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:11 PM Subject: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report, and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property,the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries, and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you(and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information(dated September 22) and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII,Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System (2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page (showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page(showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: . . 1. Identifies the project area location; 2. Discusses the proposed project; 3. Presents a summary of methods used to determine if wetlands occur on the site; 4. Discusses each of the three wetland parameters evaluated for the site; 5. Addresses the wetland rating(based on the Ecology form) and presents the buffer width(based on widths in the 1CC); 6. Shows the wetland determination field data sheets for all wetland and upland plots; 7. Shows the entire wetland rating form for each wetland identified; 8. Provides a map (or a copy of the site plan)showing the location of each wetland,the delineated edge of the wetland,and the corresponding buffer relative to property boundaries and other site features; and 9. Shows any maps,graphics,or other visuals,as needed,to show how code requirements are met. At this point, it appears that you are intending to remove vegetation from those portions of the property that are outside of the wetland buffer. Assuming this is the case,your biologist would not need to prepare an impact analysis or propose mitigation. For the wetland review,the site plan needs to show: 1. The property boundaries; 2. Any development or site features; 3. Site access; 4. Wetland boundaries and wetland buffers relative to property boundaries and site features. Regarding stormwater management,the stormwater plan must fully comply with the proposed stormwater management method, BMP T5.30.The current proposal does not appear to protect at least 65%of the site in a forest or native condition as required in this method.Also, please fully indicate on the site plan that the runoff will be fully dispersed to natively vegetated flowpaths of appropriate lengths in accordance with BMP T5.30 and not onto neighboring properties. If all conditions associated with BMP T5.30 cannot be fully met,an engineered stormwater plan is another option. To continue with review of your application, please submit a wetland report and revised site plan based on the above. Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants. We look forward to processing your permit once this information is received. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@cojefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:24 PM To: Anna Bausher Cc: Sally Ellis; Donna Frostholm; David W. Johnson Subject: Re: MLA14-00071 Additional Information Request Attachments: Re_Clarifying question regarding wetlands.eml Anna, Thanks again for looking over the revised information that I sent you. I have replied in red below. 1.The wetland determination must be conducted based on methods in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region. For any wetlands determined to be present on the property, each wetland must be delineated based on methods described in these two manuals.The plot locations and the supporting field data sheets need to be included in the wetland delineation report.The wetland rating form needs to have the appropriate supporting documents.Anna, I have submitted to you in my most recent email, and again in this email (attached RE_Clarifying question regarding wetlands), documentation where I asked David Johnson back in May this exact question "Do I need to do a delineation or a determination of the wetlands?"to be answered for me. I did exactly as David instructed in his answer. MSA is an environmental consulting company that has worked with Jefferson County and they did just as David instructed (see attachment). Please confirm with David that I have satisfied what Jefferson County needs for this property regarding my permit for clearing land as submitted. As I understand it, the buffers that are allowed by a determination are greater than the setbacks determined by a delineation.According to MSA the one page rating form and its attached map is all that is needed for a determination with buffers. Also for your reference,the width of the protective buffer around each wetland is based on the wetland rating form and the wetland buffer tables in the JCC 18.22.330,Thank you for this reference you will notice that I included this same reference in my Stormwater site Plan Submittall Template revised under Section 1-construction SWPPP narrative, environmentally sensitive areas#3b, as submitted to you. This should satisfy what you are asking. the wetland buffer needs to be shown on the site plan.The white circles are the 60 ft buffers that are instructed under JCC 18.22.330 it is shown on the map and indicated in the key in the bottom left corner of map. JCC 18.22 Article VII addresses wetlands and JCC18.22.450 addresses wetland delineation reports,these sections can be looked to for further guidance as well. 4. Regarding the road approach, Bywater Way appears to be a county road. Because of this, a county road approach will most likely be needed, unless you already have one.On the site plan,the proposed point of access(driveway)onto the parcel from Bywater Way will need to be indicated. Bywater way is a private road that we pay annual dues for, please see http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=i&g=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=ria&uact=8&ved=0CB4QHAA&url= http%3A%2F%2Fbwrma.org%2F&ei=dtOgVJC KdfroATEsoK4Dg&usg=AFQICNH NO4nDagi- irHCdouTDbpyO9Ukg&bvm=bv.75775273,d.cGU.We will follow the Bywater Way Road Maintenance Association (BWRMA) bylaws regarding construction points of access. Again, I believe I have addressed all your concerns regarding my application MLA14-00071. I will be happy to answer any other questions you have. I will look forward to receiving the permits. Thanks again, Bridget Original Message 1 L Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 8:47 PM To: Anna Bausher Cc: Sally Ellis; Donna Frostholm Subject: Re: MLA14-00071 Additional Information Request Attachments: Re_Clarifying question regarding wetlands.eml; Kaminski Wetland Rating Form.eml; revised stormwater calculation worksheet Sept 19.pdf; revised stormwater site plan submittal template Sept 19.pdf Hi Anna, Thanks for your reply. I have broken down your email to answer your questions in red: 1. Please submit the entire wetland rating form and wetland delineation report.What I submitted is the entire wetland rating form according to MSA. It is a wetland determination.According to MSA after consulting with David Johnson, I did not need to do a delineation,just a determination (rating form).See attached emails from MSA, "Kaminski Wetland Rating Form.eml" and "Re-Clarifying question regarding wetlands.eml". 2. please submit a revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that indicates the proposed amount of area to be cleared under the total land disturbance. See attached "revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet". 3. Regarding the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template,when the term construction is used,this includes the minimum standards for clearing,grading and bare earth;this does not mean that it is permanent construction.This is to ensure sediment is not leaving the parcel onto adjacent properties and roads, but is stabilizing soils.Therefore,this application still needs to address the questions the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template, specifically under the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.A couple of examples of this is scattering straw or stabilizing the construction entrance with gravel. Further information about this can be found in the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual, I am also attaching a handout on this that may be helpful.See attached "revised Stormwater Site Plan submittal Template" 4. Is there currently a road approach to this parcel? If there is, please identify it on the site plan.There is an approach road, it is on the site plan labeled Bywater Way. It is also labeled on the key of the site plan in the lower right hand corner"grey--Bywater Way---access road to site. I believe I have addressed all your concerns regarding my application MLA14-00071. I will be happy to answer any other questions you have. I will look forward to receiving the permits. Bridget 360-774-6022 Original Messa•e To: mikeandbridgetrAembargmail.com Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 4:23 PM Subject: MLA14-00071 Additional Information Request Good afternoon Bridget and Mike, Sally let me know that you were inquiring about the planner assigned to your case; I am the planner assigned. I do have some additional information to request from you, as follows. Please submit the entire wetland rating form and wetland delineation report.Also, please submit a revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet that indicates the proposed amount of area to be cleared under the total land disturbance. Regarding the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template, 1 K when the term construction is used,this includes the minimum standards for clearing,grading and bare earth;this does not mean that it is permanent construction.This is to ensure sediment is not leaving the parcel onto adjacent properties and roads, but is stabilizing soils.Therefore,this application still needs to address the questions the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template, specifically under the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.A couple of examples of this is scattering straw or stabilizing the construction entrance with gravel. Further information about this can be found in the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual, I am also attaching a handout on this that may be helpful.Also, is there currently a road approach to this parcel? If there is, please identify it on the site plan. If there is not, please identify the proposed road approach on the site plan. Feel free to contact me if you have questions regarding any of this information. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@cojefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embarqmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:10 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Hi Anna, Regarding wetlands: We are not going to be encroaching on the designated wetland or its 60 ft buffer. I read 8.22.450(1)meaning that a wetland delineation report is not required. Please explain to me how am I reading this wrong? 8.22.450 Wetland delineation report. (1) General. This report shall be required when a proposed development encroaches upon a designated wetland or its buffer, and shall be used to identify the boundaries and classification of the designated wetland. Thanks, Bridget ----Original Message i5 irk;' ,,'i ��� .....Q t u r�ii 4 " � n fir" a er 4 'w47''s +,iy °'' ,..,i�e #"#ms!2 k,• #ti^.'`',�I, ^°... "' a`',°-° ckd Pt 1�;�NIiIdNI�.� '� ��18"„ s *�+ a��`r �,��a ter�"d�,.�e ”n .. — "iv r,`.�� l�a To: Mike anb Bridget Sent:Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:11 PM Subject: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report,and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property,the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries,and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you(and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information(dated September 22)and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII,Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code(JCC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System(2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page(showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page(showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: 1 1. Identifies the project area location; 2. Discusses the proposed project; 3. Presents a summary of methods used to determine if wetlands occur on the site; 4. Discusses each of the three wetland parameters evaluated for the site; 5. Addresses the wetland rating(based on the Ecology form)and presents the buffer width(based on widths in the JCC); 6. Shows the wetland determination field data sheets for all wetland and upland plots; 7. Shows the entire wetland rating form for each wetland identified; 8. Provides a map(or a copy of the site plan)showing the location of each wetland,the delineated edge of the wetland,and the corresponding buffer relative to property boundaries and other site features;and 9. Shows any maps,graphics,or other visuals,as needed,to show how code requirements are met. At this point, it appears that you are intending to remove vegetation from those portions of the property that are outside of the wetland buffer. Assuming this is the case,your biologist would not need to prepare an impact analysis or propose mitigation. For the wetland review,the site plan needs to show: 1. The property boundaries; 2. Any development or site features; 3. Site access; 4. Wetland boundaries and wetland buffers relative to property boundaries and site features. Regarding stormwater management,the stormwater plan must fully comply with the proposed stormwater management method, BMP T5.30.The current proposal does not appear to protect at least 65%of the site in a forest or native condition as required in this method.Also, please fully indicate on the site plan that the runoff will be fully dispersed to natively vegetated flowpaths of appropriate lengths in accordance with BMP T5.30 and not onto neighboring properties. If all conditions associated with BMP T5.30 cannot be fully met,an engineered stormwater plan is another option. To continue with review of your application, please submit a wetland report and revised site plan based on the above. Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants. We look forward to processing your permit once this information is received. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher(Zi co jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 ♦ 1 Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:55 PM To: 'Bridget Richardson' Subject: RE: Regarding your questions on stormwater and wetlands Hi Bridget, I just heard back from Ecology yesterday. For the land clearing as proposed the following will be sufficient for stormwater management under BMP T5.30: Cleared Area Dispersion BMPs The runoff from cleared areas that are comprised of bare soil,non-native landscaping,lawn,and/or pasture of up to 25 feet in flow path length can be considered to be "fully dispersed" if it is dispersed through at least 25 feet of native vegetation in accordance with the following criteria: 1. The topography of the non-native pervious surface must be such that runoff will not concentrate prior to discharge to the dispersal area. 2. Slopes within the dispersal area should be no steeper than 15%. If the width of the non-native pervious surface is greater than 25 feet,the vegetated flowpath segment must be extended 1 foot for every 3 feet of width beyond 25 feet up to a maximum width of 250 feet. Once you reach the point in the future of building a residence, as you have indicated in the application,you will need to meet the applicable requirements for that building development without changing the land clearing stormwater controls that are being proposed now. It appears that the revised site plan you sent me on October 8th meets the above flowpath width requirements.As you revised the amount of clearing on this site plan,will you please send me a revised stormwater calculation worksheet with the new proposed amount of land disturbance? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Bridget Richardson [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embarqmail.com] Sent:Tuesday,October 21,2014 11:00 AM To:Anna Bausher Subject: Re: Regarding your questions on stormwater and wetlands Hi Annan, have you heard back from Ecology? Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13,2014,at 9:28 AM,Anna Bausher<ABausher@lco.iefferson.wa.us>wrote: 1 Good morning Bridget, Regarding your question with wetlands:Sufficient information in writing for documentation and review are needed to show where the wetland and buffer are in relation to the proposed development. Therefore,a brief report can be submitted instead of all of the items under 1CC 18.22.450.The bulleted items in my earlier email are what are needed to identify that the proposal is outside of the wetland and buffer and to facilitate the DCD site visit for this wetland. Donna and I spoke with Amy,from Marine Surveys and Assessments,on Friday regarding this information as well,so she is aware of what is needed for our review. Regarding your question with stormwater: It is my understanding that all applicable measures in BMP T5.30 must be met,including preserving 65%of the parcel in native vegetation. I am in contact with Department of Ecology to confirm this and will notify you once DOE provides me with additional information.Also, please be aware that the site plan revision you emailed to me indicates that the preserved area is increasing, if the total land disturbance is changing then a revised Stormwater Calculation Worksheet will needed as well to reflect this change. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@cojefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 * r I Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:41 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Hi Anna, Regarding the storm water management. If I follow the"Cleared Area Dispersion"as written in BMPT5.30 it is fully dispersed and I don't have to leave 65%of the native vegetation. Correct? Thanks Bridget Original Message - '�§ f r'i`�tF $?d.�`� —:.!�s ?,�i�uie.. To: Mike anb Bridget Sent:Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:11 PM Subject: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report,and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property,the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries,and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you(and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information(dated September 22)and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII,Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System (2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page(showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page(showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: 1. Identifies the project area location; 2. Discusses the proposed project; 3. Presents a summary of methods used to determine if wetlands occur on the site; 4. Discusses each of the three wetland parameters evaluated for the site; 5. Addresses the wetland rating(based on the Ecology form)and presents the buffer width(based on widths in the JCC); 6. Shows the wetland determination field data sheets for all wetland and upland plots; 7. Shows the entire wetland rating form for each wetland identified; 1 1- r 8. Provides a map(or a copy of the site plan)showing the location of each wetland,the delineated edge of the wetland,and the corresponding buffer relative to property boundaries and other site features;and 9. Shows any maps,graphics,or other visuals,as needed,to show how code requirements are met. At this point, it appears that you are intending to remove vegetation from those portions of the property that are outside of the wetland buffer. Assuming this is the case,your biologist would not need to prepare an impact analysis or propose mitigation. For the wetland review,the site plan needs to show: 1. The property boundaries; 2. Any development or site features; 3. Site access; 4. Wetland boundaries and wetland buffers relative to property boundaries and site features. Regarding stormwater management,the stormwater plan must fully comply with the proposed stormwater management method, BMP T5.30.The current proposal does not appear to protect at least 65%of the site in a forest or native condition as required in this method.Also, please fully indicate on the site plan that the runoff will be fully dispersed to natively vegetated flowpaths of appropriate lengths in accordance with BMP T5.30 and not onto neighboring properties. If all conditions associated with BMP T5.30 cannot be fully met,an engineered stormwater plan is another option. To continue with review of your application, please submit a wetland report and revised site plan based on the above. Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants. We look forward to processing your permit once this information is received. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street*Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@coj efferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Anna Bausher From: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 9:10 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Hi Anna, Regarding wetlands: We are not going to be encroaching on the designated wetland or its 60 ft buffer. I read 8.22.450(1) meaning that a wetland delineation report is not required. Please explain to me how am I reading this wrong? 8.22.450 Wetland delineation report. (1) General. This report shall be required when a proposed development encroaches upon a designated wetland or its buffer, and shall be used to identify the boundaries and classification of the designated wetland. Thanks, Bridget Original Message To: Mike anb Bridget Sent:Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:11 PM Subject: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report,and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property,the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries, and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you(and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information (dated September 22) and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII,Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (1CC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System (2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page(showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page(showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: 1 Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 4:12 PM To: 'Mike anb Bridget' Subject: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report,and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property,the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries, and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you (and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information (dated September 22)and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII, Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System (2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page(showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page(showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: 1. Identifies the project area location; 2. Discusses the proposed project; 3. Presents a summary of methods used to determine if wetlands occur on the site; 4. Discusses each of the three wetland parameters evaluated for the site; 5. Addresses the wetland rating(based on the Ecology form) and presents the buffer width (based on widths in the JCC); 6. Shows the wetland determination field data sheets for all wetland and upland plots; 7. Shows the entire wetland rating form for each wetland identified; 8. Provides a map(or a copy of the site plan)showing the location of each wetland,the delineated edge of the wetland,and the corresponding buffer relative to property boundaries and other site features; and 9. Shows any maps,graphics,or other visuals,as needed,to show how code requirements are met. At this point, it appears that you are intending to remove vegetation from those portions of the property that are outside of the wetland buffer. Assuming this is the case,your biologist would not need to prepare an impact analysis or propose mitigation. For the wetland review,the site plan needs to show: 1. The property boundaries; 2. Any development or site features; 3. Site access; 4. Wetland boundaries and wetland buffers relative to property boundaries and site features. Regarding stormwater management,the stormwater plan must fully comply with the proposed stormwater management method, BMP T5.30.The current proposal does not appear to protect at least 65%of the site in a forest or native condition as required in this method.Also, please fully indicate on the site plan that the runoff will be fully dispersed to natively vegetated flowpaths of appropriate lengths in accordance with BMP T5.30 and not onto neighboring properties. If all conditions associated with BMP T5.30 cannot be fully met,an engineered stormwater plan is another option. To continue with review of your application, please submit a wetland report and revised site plan based on the above. Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants. We look forward to processing your permit once this information is received. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher a,co jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Anna Bausher From: Bridget Richardson<mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 5:18 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Re: MLA14-00071:Additional Information Regarding Wetlands and Stormwater Anna, Why didn't Donna tell me this information when I sat down with her Last Spring and I paid 78.00 to discuss this exact topic;wetlands on this parcel. I also wonder why David Johnson didn't give me this information when I asked for it in an email; leading me to submit the information that I did. "Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants. " I am not asking for DCD to accept anything other than what they require from anyone else. I would, however, like DCD to be consistent, helpful, and share their knowledge with more direction. Thanks for your information. Bridget Sent from my iPhone On Oct 1,2014,at 4:11 PM,Anna Bausher<ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Good afternoon Bridget, DCD needs the information requested in our earlier email communications to continue to review of your application. Your project biologist needs to address the wetland delineation and the wetland rating in a report,and the information from the report needs to match what is shown on the site plan. The wetland report and the corresponding site plan need to show the wetland location(s)on the property, the edge of the delineated wetland boundaries, and the wetland rating(s)for each wetland identified on the property. This email is intended to provide you (and your project biologists)with guidance for wetland submittal. There are two items that need to be addressed as part of a wetland study: the wetland delineation and the wetland rating. Wetland determinations need to be based on methods in the wetland delineation manuals noted in my request for additional information (dated September 22)and the biologists for your project need to submit sufficient information to show that the work was completed based on these manuals. Currently, DCD does not have sufficient information to verify that the wetlands work completed by your biologists complies with these manuals or with the requirements in Articles VII and VIII,Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County Code(JCC). Wetland ratings need to be based on methods in the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Ratings System (2008 version). You submitted the first page of the wetlands rating form,which states that it is a summary page. In order to complete this page correctly,your biologists would have had to fill out additional supporting sheets, including: the checklist for wetlands that may need additional protection;the 2-page classification of wetland units in Western Washington;the water quality functions page (showing how water quality points were determined);the hydrologic functions page (showing how hydrologic points were determined);the 5-page habitat functions pages(showing how habitat functions were determined); and the 4-page categorization based on special characteristics. 1 Wetland reports submitted for review by Jefferson County include the following: 1. Identifies the project area location; 2. Discusses the proposed project; 3. Presents a summary of methods used to determine if wetlands occur on the site; 4. Discusses each of the three wetland parameters evaluated for the site; 5. Addresses the wetland rating(based on the Ecology form)and presents the buffer width (based on widths in the 1CC); 6. Shows the wetland determination field data sheets for all wetland and upland plots; 7. Shows the entire wetland rating form for each wetland identified; 8. Provides a map(or a copy of the site plan)showing the location of each wetland,the delineated edge of the wetland, and the corresponding buffer relative to property boundaries and other site features;and 9. Shows any maps,graphics,or other visuals,as needed,to show how code requirements are met. At this point, it appears that you are intending to remove vegetation from those portions of the property that are outside of the wetland buffer. Assuming this is the case,your biologist would not need to prepare an impact analysis or propose mitigation. For the wetland review,the site plan needs to show: 1. The property boundaries; 2. Any development or site features; 3. Site access; 4. Wetland boundaries and wetland buffers relative to property boundaries and site features. Regarding stormwater management,the stormwater plan must fully comply with the proposed stormwater management method, BMP T5.30.The current proposal does not appear to protect at least 65%of the site in a forest or native condition as required in this method.Also, please fully indicate on the site plan that the runoff will be fully dispersed to natively vegetated flowpaths of appropriate lengths in accordance with BMP T5.30 and not onto neighboring properties. If all conditions associated with BMP T5.30 cannot be fully met,an engineered stormwater plan is another option. To continue with review of your application, please submit a wetland report and revised site plan based on the above. Please be aware that this department is not asking you to do any more than DCD requires of other applicants.We look forward to processing your permit once this information is received. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street*Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 * Fax 360-379-4451 abausher(a),coj effers on.w a.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 4-P-A- A:tAii-A-€..._ M �, 1 L O JEFFERSON COUNTY ,�, 9 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT= I S EP - 2014 . 621 Sheridan Street •• Port Townsend ••Washington 9836 1 . S 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax JEFFERSON COUNTY ���! http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ _ DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: 1-11.0,0\ GAT,�q /k i c' c tXSo e'1 J Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. No ;n.P 04 v4t, cikt., t "C l4rtc( oc a[ '( A I stumps and sIntJbs 0 Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. Lund s k, 13 % -b lone_ Pas'r. See.. s►-k,PAo p 3. Describe the existing ve9etation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. Vne_ en.vi re, Po`fce.l t S 0,4 e reA w eq.% vv ;see vts6i\--ak o n ; Ctao..r j Elt wcloc)� ) ( c! cir, P t ct Re, . Katn be.4-TNA ) , Sa Q al SuJ a t2 Qi-M j t OA c n sJ Tutlnec , S(tin)t,, ,M 1 S 0- VitrAi ( o{ . o�nfx.dAScde 4 p►ItiL -1nc►A We�-S f isu least a Q.x 1noa p cZtWA art irr Wek\artekV�6,./a0v1 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. C0.5 So to i 34,n c iii (oc r>7 a5'nd' I onskrap. • 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e.,drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. o-ao 2 106 _.54,ift re ca v1/4/4 ktivtoklAka of t a,r r e& c p SAAL Si,(.e, t aio Cacu d ca ita , cad s fix. -rn uu akr d\L,� 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: EX ce.-S in a:se WD)!d be-'j € `c" 63 cam;..S")S, CtiAl"ACI Irkv,nbe.f', 1arci.wh jc CV Lam,F- avd 1 o3 h ihei dehl Ore S II stormwater site plan template.doc-rev.4/28/2014 5 1 • 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. S 2 w A-Ir a vc15 a A 5'4t, M&p p„ot wv land rck n.cal „y 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads,and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands, lakes,steep slopes,etc.). 11n;s is a c & Cce.a_ ?S\ac 3t actt\o t CM' Sairtg e_ a.nut v\orsuv vrat aS ve,n,�af , J-3S+ calf_ Opt ft&C1at* rc.a arrtd. 5e e_ €unteAs a►kd atocJ ptevn to (or mn-ce. i. . Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium” size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces,, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed(i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual)or, if not, what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas • within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. Sbcwakfnr ltldistekcc4 ptc 8 8mPTS.so 1cund C./tax-CAA/ 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. Ct e a,C i AC4CtrACt h 01,v b�;1 d S F 2 i n ct. S,- ea rd t, ire 12. Describe the flow control system. Fk (ta, CEA per! stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 6 ICI • 13. Describe the water quality system. n -E r-\\\ Illj SEf— 9 2014 LI 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. JEFFERSON COUNTY N t_._. DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 15. Describe the source of fill material, physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. N 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. . 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. N ft 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. N • 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals here. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. \JJ QNaan,,A re rdl e l■c h 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. F eps Q N stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 7 • CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIV �/,, 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at Volume II Section 3.2.3 of the Manual(beginning on page 3-7). 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. 2. Establish Construction Access. 3. Control Flow Rates. • 4. Install Sediment Controls. 5. Stabilize Soils. • 6. Protect Slopes. 7. Protect Drain Inlets. 41) stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 8 • elf a. JEFFERSON COUNTY E Q V' 1 1 7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D 44.,0=4,,, 621 Sheridan Street• Port -5°17 send•Washington 98368 S E P - 9 2�Jt�4 360/379-4450 .360/379-44ax - http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT":OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENY Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: ( ICI C.AeOz >>r J \()1.Oa stn DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,""medium,"or large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpfiifor completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E..SITE) Size of parcel 3. acres acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet ' 52 sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonabi could have been e •=cted to natural occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;s ru•- such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION.AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted kir proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert' acres or more of Construction site for structures 0 sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. 0 sq/ft Circle: Yes No \CN` Well,utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2'4 acres or more of O native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. sgfft Circle: Yes No Lawn,landscaping,etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. (0 sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 0 sq/ft Cut 0 Fill 0 (cu/yd) S [over] stormwater cak worksheet—REV 2/2W2008 1 Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions iiik prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof — tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS—IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) Q sq/ft Structures(all roof area) 17) sq/ft Sidewalks O sq/ft Sidewalks 0 sq/ft Patios 0 sq/ft Patios C:3 sclift Solid Decks d sq/t Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc 0 sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads,etc sq/ft Other C sq/ft Other <3 sq/ft Total New O sqlft Total Existing CD sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* O sq/ft *This mount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT • d Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: 0 o/a Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. jeans r is no the sal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used At this juncture,the applicant should er to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum equrreme o er management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "smalr projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Constriction Stormwater Pollution r Prevention-an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP)Best Management Practices(BMPs)Packet. proponents of"medium"proiects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements In through and for "large' projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are utred to submit a Stormwater Site Pla . DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan,, prindpally for rura res'- 1- • • -«.-. om• - I e em• =to in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all TIA/A_______..—of the erected props . 9 / 9114 (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA SIGNATURE) (DATE) • stormwater calc worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 2 • 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. i C V I 9. Control Pollutants. -` Jr SEP - 9 2414 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I 10. Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs). 12. Manage the Project. S 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas,roads). b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 • b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g.,erodibility,settleability, permeability,depth,texture,soil structure). 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence b. Construction phasing(if proposed) 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. • II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following,if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations • stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 10 .. tr.: - - -,,,,tr,4:*,',-,:';:;-:j..''''',Y':''':':.::::'.•::, --At- •,..,...• .,5..2:71' ",.-,.'' ,, ', ' „.'7,:,A ..,;gli,,,Ii!?,",::^.."'"-• ,-,•-', '-. ,,,'"'''''' -= t;',..-a E--, F -,,,. :•;:::,„.„,...4,„.1,-, J.-- - 4'' ..4,:, - - .i."'':;.,,.''.', -, ' a., '.,..., „i ' a.. --. . \I .--.J • n. :.-- i ,., ,.. -- ES,'.-- ".,r •-:....,...„- , r'l --- '...- ..:., - ......, .. .''... .,.imadip..,. ... ........ tilt . , , ... . . .. ... „,..., cr. 44-* ...,.. ..„.,.,. ..„..„... f. p t-, .... . .. ......, P.. r ...:, ...•;-..;::,,•• • -• - • * ,....,., ,,, 1 '. ..• .. ,,,,t,...: ,• % , • 8 ....,,.. ,:„....„. . ,, ,....,. ..: .. ...... ''''''' 7ac"'• is .. • . ,.. ..,.. .,„ .... . . • ,....... , .,.... ,„. -7, 0 al- , '''' . . ..-. ,.... (I, e, a ,e. \di , 7 .," •.„,.., \ ..„.„ ; .„„ .,, f.: • - ..._. „. - ,-. , ,,,,-., ,/ .,, • ..------ . - ... I ...) . . \ \ '''' ,/ ■ ,\ ..„, NI ,/,' .„...,- j• : ', .......,_ P , 5 „... ,. 1 , 1 1 % 1 Vi \ .,, \ ,., . .1? i'V -t• .. ,...4 , --_,- 4 ,... .....__ k7TriP 1 f j I ^.....--" I I , . il / ...... ,,,,, „...._. ..., - --lio HL ci) rf-r (--- . --) --1-..... • 17._.,, , . 3 A.- P w � -`,-1-);VI r,r W z m 0 fD DJ p _ -- O a n N fD , g N O Y. .. .t a O m 0 rt Q v � C _. 5 cn CU rr in f c • n �. 713 -s 7 Q '� ` ¢' o m v N 71: Cz n0 J Q ra co O �' O Q cn +^ ,+ 3 2D o }r cu .�i o v L _. o ., R ,i.v, C[ ♦+ "f ro� f w CD CD n c ' tcl VI n w N i- W 7 O Z ' i of m N O p G -- —00 W O -7_,G p O co m rn + -CS a c N 3 S CD 0 O O `n v 73 rD .6 -D 7 m V N -CDD O + N r = O r m O v -, O N Z Q 7 Q N• v Z fD 0- (c o• O W --7 �- '�• ro °�' O fui ¢ -t- u-1 - rt Z 171 m f<D -, m rnr 6. j =� N n • 0.) 0 t 0 oO10 n i`'�i 0) (p m N Oo — _ J ' Z G . V _ NJ m rD •— _ _. _.._.. .. 2 CD < t N 3 ro F, r. . < c-s C COPY JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REFUND REQUEST/POSTING MEMO DATE: 11/3/14 The amount of: 652.00 received from: Bridget A Kaminski for(case#): zon14-36 is to be refunded to: Bridget A Kaminski Bridget was charged $652.00 for PW stormwater review- it was determined that PW will not be doing a review on this stormwater permit. as a result of: Date& number of original receipt: 151517 personal check#3225 REVENUE FUND CODE NO. REVENUE SOURCE NAME AMOUNT 001-250-000 369.90.00.0000 BAD CHECK FEE 127-000-010 346.23.11.5200 WATER AVAILABILITY FEES-EH H2O 127-000-010 346.23.11.5400 DCD BLDG REVIEW-SEPTIC 127-000-010 346.23.11.5800 SHORT/LONG PLAT FEES 143-000-010 322.10.00.0000 BUILDING BASE & INSPECTIONS 143-000-010 322.10.10.0000 BUILDING PERMIT RENEWAL FEE 143-000-010 322.40.80.0000 ADDRESSING FEES 143-000-010 341.60.00.0000 DUPLICATING SERVICES 143-000-010 341.75.00.0000 SALE OF MAPS& PUBLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.70.00.0000 DCD TECH ASSIST FEE 143-000-010 345.81.00.0000 SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.20.0000 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEV. PERM. 143-000-010 345.81.30.0000 CURRENT USE TAX ASSESSMENT APP 143-000-010 345.81.40.0000 ZONING APPROVAL APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.60.0000 CONVERSION OPTION HARVEST PLAN 143-000-010 345.83.00.0000 PLAN CHECK FEES 143-000-010 345.83.10.0000 FIRE MARSHALL PLAN REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0000 SEPA/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0143 PERMIT SCANNING FEE 143-000-010 346.22.30.0040 DCD WATER REVIEW 143-000-010 389.40.00.0000 CASP- NON-REVENUE CUST DEPOSITS 180-000-010 322.40.40.0000 MISC APPLICATIONS& PERMITS 652.00 180-000-010 322.40.50.0000 RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATIONS 180-000-010 343.20.10.0000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES 650-511-000 386.00.00.0000 STATE BUILDING CODE FEES TOTAL REFUND 52.00 ASOP Authorized person signature: Treasurer's check# Date: Treasurer's signature: . , . ir ,.. Exit N-Tre Open Te:;1.kt OBE GIS •E2 a 3 )‹. A • a g .0. View Add Delete Pe Fee Hi:tory Print Refund Aill' „ k., , ,, , . .(;,, ' ,,,, ''-'"".;,,,,, ',,, ''''''-'.,„; ,74.„ -"''T-111,-,Aks14 sl,,,•. , ,,. MI case Fee-',-,‘,:,:,::,::: ::, -,k'f',g,,,,,;-:-,,,,,,,--,„-...--At,',, --,- ,, , „-,,,, _ . .,. ,,,,.,--:::4.11,, .:%1-i .,./2,?:!:,,Q,,i,:,,, i‘,„. k,,,,:,7,,: ' :;;,,,,,,,,:lis\Ii.''' '' ',\,''''''4'--t!-'- ''' ''w,;>:,-,,....'..;,,,, :-''';', ;,',' '.',,-'',',%'',i■.,ii;',':''..z:',.'':;:W.el,;:'frN'Q'' l„ xr:,,,,:tit•i:.'z\-4i-ite'k' '61;:'1.;:;f',', ,i,t..,..--,,,,,,,t,...1:4-•..:tgia~kreargiz...(nai<X.rr<A4'ri<".••,..,<‘-,„,<"`".7..z.?,'„,,,',<-,,,,;(,,,,,,A).1,<M,MENS ,-r, '2•41:,<<„,,A.- .."'<`<><rr:=<•F'1,' ,',,,,,,. '''''.-p,,.::i:,,',,,,,,s4K.A.: "........,;7:‘:',:, .• ' ".‘1,5—..;,..1/4::;"%.::;:.-',,, ` „, .,=;=. ,:;—;"4'..', ., : ...:P)1,..,...'j.:i::yi:,-.;,%1 ''''Sk :"<<-",),4,-; '<1.41,,,f , :•••,••-",<,:4-,,,r,:<., DPW StormwateriBidg Com, ii-: .;;-**,., ','„. ..- _,..- ,: , - -,, - " ,-- --$,, , ,?"-i„..„1-,,.:v..v..,,,........ev.,...,,-....,.................--. ,,,....„.......... ,,,, I Edit 652 0Cf4at.";',4;74.1.i .,,, $1,00 .' ,=IT.,,, 3:-.;,,,,-,-:,r, -.:40;,.,„ „.. ..., , .:,.....,4„-;;;;,....:,.../.,.,.,:e..,...:,....v,,..-.....,,,,,,,...c- ' -- -- - ' -- . —' ' -.' - ' .-' ' ''-—...; FAS',"r.,2<f,'•,,,,,,:.'3.....;,.",.. ' '''343 20 1° ,.,.,,, „.... F.I-4. 114 155610 SE 6:2." . ., ...,. , . . „. .., i .-'..: vil 0 1,',-,:..,','f;',4've.:::::.,:e,,,,.'•.,:',11..',1"',..,. -rEr1r'",v','''4":xwel'''' '''''''"'''''''''* ' '''''#'"''''''' '''''' ''' k4 114 15.56-10 sRE . . 4.0 •;.:-.77,2,;‘;-,.,-;:;, ;.‘.:::',.':7::‘,-;,.x,',:..,,,:iv.;.‘,.:,,,,;.,,,,, ,:,,..,.:-.'.,,,,..,...-- Cancel 1:1E4 4114 15:56:10 SRE .: i I 14 1 ra56. . i'l i':''1'i ite..2...;: ';''.'"V:...;.f,-).,:::.,4°N -4.-:,;.‘,.‘i-:;%%."':a>...':`<Uit.'„,,!;%;',,,+/:,.*;;.., : ::::f4',".1.';',4'.;'.'!'`,,,N-A-YL2z.Y't.'41,;:r.,,;!;',i''.4k'i,. .''1,•,1%Irf"0.'..T;),:',: '4 .10 SRE , , _ R DONtiATOOK IN WI STORM WATER FEE OF$652 00 ALSO ROUTED COPES OF SITE ' ', =,4. . '' Help RAN MATER FERMFT APP.WERAtID REPORT,STORMWATERCALCULATION Wffli I ' -. ,:. ' , , .. . .. *. ORIAVATER PLAN TO ERIC-9/9114 l':P . ,,,,,,,,;;....5.1,,,:•..,:z z.......-...„.- .. OFM710:'-''.;*:,:.,:iNg.;:',,','',..;1:-;:.:`,-134,-4?3,‘„,;,-4-;;;',„,,Vv.:1;;;.,.:;-X.,',,, ,,:i';',4...:,.,,iu f..2'':.';v:.;' ;•4„.;,!:::i;:kz,-}i '''',:4-:%''';,4,;:'',."`*re• ,>.:..- ',..,,,, ",.', ';...„.".7,...,-..-." '-',.,.„.;: ,.,.!•"1,,:grA-,-,.,......:-.-....-..4-.4--,-,..-....:, '' - ''fk•C;;,;41 'i 3j c[00-- A- • 1:c-,,,,ry\,.() V ( In 1 1 - ICI5i7i-- 21,11 W , LAik I '11\e;;Lt L Pr‘ 1,0P- i .1t11)—7--3-L-I i 11 ti.J.ct.k= Cle-i-eivtiv■,;,-)ecl at-r--4-'tv. Ke L)i.'e - Pvi UL)t (1 likc)-1 , . re0 le La.) +t(1,`" ) SI-Dr n,ILLI.,,teb, pej.;mL.1 , • See ci4icet.1,L.Gd e_.iv-lad , * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O � +z 00 00 00 00 00 c a N ds x w w w A A CL W W (I) A W W wSW A z"a , oW (J) z(/) A z z z w, z z z Z kn ,n d d O N N M 'M M M M O O O O O N N N Tw �O 41 O O� O� O� C. 0 �' �oo O 00 00 o c •0 i O N O I'tI� t,� 69 0 C1• O C C t-.O o o ao ct a O cittr 'n y en 0 SQ O v r o i. 8 (i 54 0 4 c) © c c cs 00 oc 00 0 p ,.: I :II . . - to � °c'1, t i kfl c . ‘� � 4y" N' N N N E..- 0 tii 0,,:i.,,,,,,,,,::::.. .. . ,‹ ; i. 01 cl . Sally Ellis From: Anna Bausher rco AT Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:03 AM To: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: land clearing Richardson parcel#821265017 Hey Sally, PW did not review this application because it is residential stormwater. It is my understanding that PW does not review residential stormwater applications. If you know differently please let me know. Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4454 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Sally Ellis Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 4:27 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: FW: land clearing Richardson parcel#821265017 Hey Anna Could you please look at the below email from Bridget and let me know if in fact we did include PW(Public Works)on the ZON14- 00036 case or should we do a refund? Thank you Sal From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.coml Sent: Friday,October 31, 2014 7:15 AM To:Sally Ellis Subject: Re: land clearing Richardson parcel#821265017 Hi Sally, Could you please let me know if PW needs to look at my application?When I paid, you had mentioned that PW may not need to do anything with it and I would be refunded the$652.00. Thanks for your time. Bridget Original Message Front;Sally Ellis To: Mike anb Bridget Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:08 AM Subject: RE: land clearing Richardson parcel#821265017 Good morning Bridget, 1 The MLA# is MLA14-00071 the case#ZON14-00036. This permit is pending and has not yet been assigned to a planner. Once it has been assigned and reviewed-then approved- I will call you to advise the permit has been issued and then you can start the work. If you have any questions or need more information please let me know. Thank you Sincerely � `�- t Sally L Ellis Jefferson County Community Development Permit Technician 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 360-379-4452 sellis@co.jefferson.wa.us From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @thembaramail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:44 PM To: Sally Ellis Subject: land clearing Richardson parcel#821265017 Hi Sally, Just checking in to see if you have my MLA#for me? I was in your office area last Tuesday at 10:30, and worked with you to submit permits for my land clearing Richardson project parcel#821265017. Thanks for the info. Bridget 2 ke d/rsay\ () 901- Chi airf , r cJ✓tcaAdS c r2 LN)E. 0 LE II V jil; i 4 -- QD —41 ! I OCT 2 3 2014 ZDJ I LC - DDD3tr � JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i t_(old )40;1,(1/(kOr PerTh-AAL' \ a:.1/4C-c4(- to/22, eairce2 * Bai . .(0 5o rte►- � �-�711 o, 14,r` m T-Ce S Sktad dun (0/23 call. Sessro► - We_ 611eA-4-ad * _ C,ov n + cmc S w. 1..avids O)1 O') C raw to p a bVcrs CP t`, " S p u 5k rt, ka+ Q 1 c de krn int cL. (cZ i ,e:E -Ci . acdinec - On c wr +ka,k— CC3\M\-1-) SV101) 1A. 2 rcv wre,(-{afl 0A/c( cip W tut LSki 6,0,1'd Dye-- w; t A.e buff-ter. ti s(_ 011/\ Wk. w)(k tht Co‘m wr\ I I - I I I I II M LA- ?Li 4-1 wk, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME REFUND REQUEST/POSTING MEMO DATE: 11/3/14 The amount of: 652.00 received from: Bridget A Kaminski for(case#): zon14-36 is to be refunded to: Bridget A Kaminski Bridget was charged $652.00 for PW stormwater review- it was determined that PW will not be doing a review on this stormwater permit. as a result of: Date & number of original receipt: 151517 personal check#3225 REVENUE FUND CODE NO. REVENUE SOURCE NAME AMOUNT 001-250-000 369.90.00.0000 BAD CHECK FEE 127-000-010 346.23.11.5200 WATER AVAILABILITY FEES-EH H2O 127-000-010 346.23.11.5400 DCD BLDG REVIEW-SEPTIC 127-000-010 346.23.11.5800 SHORT/LONG PLAT FEES 143-000-010 322.10.00.0000 BUILDING BASE & INSPECTIONS 143-000-010 322.10.10.0000 BUILDING PERMIT RENEWAL FEE 143-000-010 322.40.80.0000 ADDRESSING FEES 143-000-010 341.60.00.0000 DUPLICATING SERVICES 143-000-010 341.75.00.0000 SALE OF MAPS& PUBLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.70.00.0000 DCD TECH ASSIST FEE 143-000-010 345.81.00.0000 SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.20.0000 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEV. PERM. 143-000-010 345.81.30.0000 CURRENT USE TAX ASSESSMENT APP 143-000-010 345.81.40.0000 ZONING APPROVAL APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.60.0000 CONVERSION OPTION HARVEST PLAN 143-000-010 345.83.00.0000 PLAN CHECK FEES 143-000-010 345.83.10.0000 FIRE MARSHALL PLAN REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0000 SEPA/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0143 PERMIT SCANNING FEE 143-000-010 346.22.30.0040 DCD WATER REVIEW 143-000-010 389.40.00.0000 CASP- NON-REVENUE CUST DEPOSITS 180-000-010 322.40.40.0000 MISC APPLICATIONS& PERMITS 652.00 180-000-010 322.40.50.0000 RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATIONS 180-000-010 343.20.10.0000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES 650-511-000 386.00.00.0000 STATE BUILDING CODE FEES TOTAL REFUND 52.00 Authorized person signature t C ° Treasurer's check# Date: Treasurer's signature: 14 -11,1jeta Oltlad ‘.V 2/ 1820 JEFFERSON ST PO BOX 571 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 (360) 385 -9150 Received From: **ORIGINAL** Receipt Number 4431 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Receipt Date 11/07/2014 Clerk TCASH REFUND CK - B KAMINSKI nRcpt FundJDept Description Revenue Paid 4050 180 - 000-010 MISC APPLICATIONS & PERMITS 322 40 40 0 652 .00 Total 652 . 00 - Tender: Refund 652 . 00 Bank of America TREAS>VER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY 23273 ACH R!T 123308825 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 98-0882/1233 OR 2090 PAY TO THE 11/7/2014 8 ORDER OF BRIDGET A KAMINSKI Six Hundred Fifty-Two Only****** **652,00 DOLLARS in IEMO `®. Refund DCD fee �o� 4 viva)d. u. �..I,:.�.® nap 2 3 2 7 3 n� �; ® ' 23308825 ; 500000 , L 0 7 . AilrHClti7D s�rvnnlpE_ _ 733u 11\i3Wd01.AAJO AlINf WW00 30 ldJG 1J.N1100 NOSN33J'3( + T s z' \ ,n` i H S - 130 ` w" ,,t .....N.� � _t - t s -- j J C. J v t zd 0 . e - n .1 o.. a o• kil 4\ s '‘ "0 # i ( 1 1. s i V, ' N \ V/ . 0 4- .a- s s d t ? l d p v h i '.-7-:..1.''-60...6- '''t ti 7-73 sj‘- "-2 -3'..).---4):; c5 1.) b 64 s ,.s-) a) F- 0 -0 £ . Le 8 U ct t Q- U 0O J M c v ,4 p Q .s d cam? w 4 c -a , M '—''-. \tp g. 11 v v u 3 m om v CO m E V Z [1:0 Wetland name or number i SE'-"' WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHING/TON JEFFERSON COUNTY Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility amoisgtiseQFT OF COMMUNITY DE`FIOr) Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats ------ Name of wetland(if known): PAR c.V 1 ol..l(i 5 0 13- Date of site visit: 9141 Rated by r'VtKtc.4E 5uk,?\A-,y5. Trained by Ecology? Yes'No X Date of training Aa5F- MTT+i - M Rr \)5 AAA 5. NlcoLV:S SEC:213 TWNSHP' RNGE: O1 e Is SIT/R in Appendix D? Yes X No Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size 39t g 1(3 5z Ft. SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I II III__ IV 4 Score for Water Quality Functions Category I=Score>-70 Category II=Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 5 Category III= Score 30-50 Score for Habitat Functions Category IV = Score<30 TOTAL score for Functions • Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II Does not Apply X Final Category (choose the"highest"category from above) Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope X Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal one of the abovr' Nt'� > ' ‘''' Check if unit has multiple �e..r 4.�P s..Nus—r-4 - HGM classes present °tJ • Wetland Rating Form—western Washington I August 2004 version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025 E i l.ry t ilt)f r fR0Fl✓SStoNAL Cir..-tgrkFvc-Ai t-t oINA RTu'T41) STPcT Lkr-o.v cv 5t I CD n z Ni n bQ O CD Q. a x, ° N • co '•{.� r-j �' 6 j j Ul t.. tot cr 0 14 n '-'::< ~ < `C O 9 O . (a 03 00 �� 6 i t * IU .Y+ V� CZ., Y (/ A '-- CD '--. O CD m «. > Off+, P� �. `., NJ -P W 0-' r-' fi `C 5x N 00 V1 O < A Ift, fix. 't N g3 0 c4 a. � 01 V CO C4 0. O -.1 V 00 C .P_ CD 4 m O c O P "• %' .4., r* Q„ t 1 CD (n u, !('N9 0 3 3 CD 01 N N W e Ou,load .M.. N N x$4 Fa (D ao s Cl N N C m 04:),0 ,,:. p N N A .g2 —• CD f"i m V 4)W OVVO T 4 ;:: T N I77 El 1x c4 CD W Ja 00 N CO ___ v A A R O W O'a fa co cr. W C O $1.) m ( x cn U1 co R (D = , CD 0 W u1 i s Ot 0) [.J W R [i R O CD m •- m ....4 co sg sg `--1 6l C4 +I v Up CD .-• x Po iio 11D 0 _ --- 0 1N3waoi3/\. a uiNnU itio3—10 0 uurioo NOF,J»-,31 CD P ' l CD 0 `a fli0 6 — d3 S cn ■ DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATIoN Applicant , c Application Project k Marne»' A i k ,r State: V,J. P County. o �u�,, r`' Legal Description: Township: t' l ange: Date: t k s t 4- Plot No.: i. ., ,,,f> Section: )(. Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only t or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Specie!. Status Species Status Trees Herbs _ I. r v. r ti `' � ' .. 7 }s-I t r.L,X1"1 rte, )1'.. `'- `a�Pk t 3. ;' `-,et Ctl Ck, r P r . 9. SaPlingsfahruhs Woody vines ►.'''P ;,, ..),IC C, '"t. 3.A1. ,° - 10. 5. Y l,.a\4 4hOvi' k7s ti l'o vv. S 8", '«.K. 11. Z of apeciss that are OBL, YAW, and/or FAC: t }�, Other indicators. Flydrophytic vegetation: Yes No Basis O , . Soil Series and phases c. , , ° -,a, 1! 1.1 M hydric soils list? Yes- N0 Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle color. ; Matrir color: k) 1,4----.(1,4. Gleyed. Yes No Other indicators:, aydric soils: Yes No ,,,,/ '; basis: _ „ _ s a nt a 1`, , °a < ifydrology Inundated: Yes ; No Depth.. of standing water: . Saturated soils: Yes ; No ' . Depth to saturated soil: . Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No . basis: . Atypical situation: Yes ; No 1 Normal Circumstances? The '; No wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nanwetland '„,/- . Comments: Determined by: ik;.$"A AA' l';A `"' - ,;4}' q s; '1 DEC - 3 " , I' Y DATA FORM WETLAND DETERMINATIoN Applicant „ APPlication Project Name t S.(ty1 ;° ,, Number: Name: $e State: 1.0.:.'4 Countyxt. "fi fi.Legal Description: 'Township: Range Date: 1 l Plot No.: 4t Section: -11 Vegetation (list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only I or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or knos+nn physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species Status Species Statue Trees Herbs tq y p `A� +'� .4 t j"1 b,„r.� -.(,�.k.. 1Ac, ' l G l',r7 '4�,. :{ 4 9p� sa 3. 9. Saplings/shrubs Woody vines 4. y 10. r"# t [< 6. 12. X of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or PAC: *. r,1 Other indicators: R3rdrophytic vegetation: Yes * No Basis: yt tk . it Series and phase:ti 4 7 V r y e = kr. On hpdric soils list? Yes ; N o b , Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle scalar. ; Matrix colors Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: Hydric soils: Yes No ; Resist _ 'A , '” tiydralogy Inundated; Yes_ ; No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yea ; No . Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No if . Basis: . Atypical situation: Yes ; No 444 . Normal Circumstances? Yes 1"x No Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nor:wetland ` Comments: -- Determined by•" r _ 3 J DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant r, Application Project , Name: F E Number: Naze: ,w r t- t .�. State: °.' County. t Legal Description: Townships Range. Yti Date: 2 . ',z` Plot No.: I Section: Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only i or 2 layers)). Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptation** with an asterisk. indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status 'gees Huss C .y+ 3. 9. G tar 4.f ' &C Saplings/shrubs Woody vines } .5. V &.. (C-s i to :ray.<4" ° 11. 6. 12. X of species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Other indicators: Hydrophytic vegetation: Yes No Basis:n4 .°4, Co Sc.k +t 1 tt . Soil Series, and phase ti "AA:11001,10n hydric soils list? Yes ; Ito Mottled: Yes ; No . Mottle color: ; Matrix color: Gleyed: Yea No Other indicators * `, *€ Rydele soils: Yes No ; Basis: Hydrology Inundated: Yes V ; No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes 1f ; No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: 4 Wetland hydrology: Yes V , No Rests: Atypical situation: Yes ; No . Normal Circumstances? Yes No Wetland Determination: Wetland # ; Ncrnwetland Comments: 1 11 V; Determined by: t - 3 7 ,'. !' ATV naf -NT DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Applicant ; Application Project ? �' _ ' .pot-QC;"Fanse: '��r�� a' ���;� -�t� ,���`;��"'�`�- Nu�basr; Name: P state; 44A County; J f i°f T= egel Description: Township , Range: C)5.1:17 Bate: i 1 s4- Va) Plot No.: Section: V, {,., Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only 1 or 2 layers)]. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk.. indicator Indicator Species Status Species Status Trees Herbs cam=. 4 2. U ; c t t CAC- 3. 9. t vi k -'` Saplings/Shrubs Woody vines 4.` s i , .0,,', ^- " .4 ld. L. uc r" t, r a 5. I1. 6. 12. r � g of species that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC: t. Other indicators: flydrophytic vegetation: Yes No . Basis: t". = . ' c\ac' -t,ttC. Soil Series and phase:sA,90 AO.,,AAA Litt r .On bydric soils list? Yes. ; No Mottled. Yes ; No , Mottle color: ; Matrix cal.er: I" . Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: 1 Bydric soils: Yes No r Basis: 1,5 L °4 4 --ta, .A ,. Hydrology Inundated: Yes ; No . Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes + ; No Depth to saturated soil: Other indicators: Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No , Basis: Atypical situation: Yes ; No . Normal Circumstances? Yes No Wetland Determination: Wetland ; Nonwetland Cents; �_ Determined by: � rAw -3•A;i n \ -) ++ DEC - Li DATA FORM 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION .Applicant I Application Project Name» V4 , guuther; Name:T4c401`,,,,tx--k, State: t.,ki County: ,„ -k"k Legal Description: Township:,kik!..,4 Ranges 6 r,„ Date: kk tf Plot No.: 'it k k Section: --40 )-!kkkk, Vegetation [list the three dominant species in each vegetation layer (5 if only 1 or 2 layers)1. Indicate species with observed morphological or known physiological adaptations with an asterisk. Indicator Indicator Species States Species State* Trees Herb! r ckk 2. -I-S• ifk4"-t-eksCkik,Nk okk.ck- ) -I ,kk. Ikk-C . 3. -Po, (kkev4 ekt t 1:: 9. V. m' IN\ IC Saplingsishrubs Woody vines 4* 10. "r 6. 12. f -- 2 of species that are ORL, PAC: t -"Xi Other indicators: Rydrophytic vegetation: Yes v . 11.! Fit„„',7n, Irtyr\goilt„2„4 C Soil C. c Series and phasetka--; C`N-VOn hydrie soils list? Yes ; No Mottled: Yes ; No Mottle color: ; Matrix color: Gleyed: Yes No Other indicators: Hydric soils: Yes_ 4‘0,- No ; trten rt:0-11 ttc„4-0/ ( V'tHydrology Inundated: Yes ; No Depth of standing water: Saturated soils: Yes V ; No . Depth to saturated soil: '&1k4,4),,, Other indicators: t ! Wetland hydrology: Yes ; No . Pasts: •-• „kk ikkkk, Atypical situation: Yes ; No •""" Normal Circumstances? Yes V No . Wetland Determination; Wetland t Nonwetlend Comments, De te mined by: t:,„146,05 ; f L 3,1 11 n. - 3 Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget (DNR) From: Bridget Richardson <mikeandbridgetr @embargmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:59 AM To: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget (DNR) Subject: Fwd: Vegations Supplemental app. � CI 11 V FE, l Sent from my iPhone _ + !i f' I fw,I Begin forwarded message: JEFFERSON COUNTY _,DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT From: Donna Frostholm <DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us> .__. Date:August 27, 2014 at 9:08:17 AM PDT To: Mike anb Bridget<mikeandbridgetr @embarqmail.com>, Sally Ellis<SEllis @co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: RE:Vegations Supplemental app. Sally: This is an application to log a portion of the property. It would be a stormwater permit($380) with SEPA($919)and scanning fee ($19). ?ubt c Work_ k—e� -� (052:0 Mike and Bridget: SLPA 12: � \ckL.'t To remove vegetation from your parcel,you need to submit: • a Master Permit Application (check the box for stormwater application); • • a wetland report; C isSa11C 1 axrcl • S a scaled site plan showing the parcel boundaries,the area to be cleared, the wetland and wetland buffer, any existing structures on the property, and adjacent roads; • • a stormwater calculation sheet; •• a stormwater plan (based on page 5-30—BMP T5.30 of the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual or an engineered stormwater plan); • an Environmental Checklist (for SEPA); and • a check to cover permitting fees. Once you have all of the above, call Jefferson County DCD to make an appointment(360-379-4450)to submit the application to Sally. Best, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Mike anb Bridget [mailto:mikeandbridgetr @embarqmail.com] Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:40 AM To: Sally Ellis Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: Re:Vegations Supplemental app. Hi, I filled out the forms you attached to the below email, and I would like to make an appointment with one of you to move forward with my project. 1 I Sally Ellis Subject: Bridget Richardson Start: Tue 9/9/2014 10:30 AM End: Tue 9/9/2014 12:00 PM M E C E O V Recurrence: Weekly I !_,1j Recurrence Pattern: every Tuesday from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM i c , y Organizer: Mary Blain I`; JEFFERSON COUNTY '`::i'T.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Name of Appt person: Bridget Richardson Phone Number: 360-774-6022 Name of Property Owner: Bridget Richardson Parcel Number: 821265017 Address, if applicable: None Project: (NSFR, SPAAD etc?) Land clearing CAM: Spoke w/Donna, needs Wetland Report — 3 0ti • [051 1- ./tcS(\e_A e' ,5 II Txrce T Sccce_ . Nef (P5l PjpcAiIor - Caavd{r,,eY j tiO - \Se get Tr, / (10 pc- cie3 gz ert- Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 , �� y -- Weather Station Database Tool_ VA 1,Q"a . 1Y a4 t —, a ome . o 1y Info D epartments Beare Parcel Number: 821265017 SEARCH Parcel Number: 821265017 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: MICHAEL .] RICHARDSON BRIDGET A KAMINSKI- RICHARDSON kLA I -h -7 1 2034 W VALLEY RD CHIMACUM WA98325-9746 Site Address: Section: 26 School District:Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Port Ludlow (3) Township: 28N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 0231 Planning area: Paradise Bay (8) Sub Division: Assessor's Land Use Code: 9100 - Vacant Land Property Description: WHITE ROCK COVE TRACTS DIV II TRACT 5 W/PTN OS V10/P105 Tax,A/V, Sales, Photos, and Permit Data Bldg Data Map Parcel Plats &Surveys Septic Monitoring Info 7 n county t ;/$4 HOME I COUNTY INFO ( DEPARTMENTS l SEARCH s. Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel N0=821265017 9/9/2014 Cases Associated with a Parcel Page 1 of 1 9, Weather Station Database r0o15 Maps ■r� web�am -lame County Info Departments Search Cases Associated with Parcel No: 821265017 This may not be a complete listing of information that exists for this parcel. There may be other information pertinent to the property on file. Please contact the Department of Community Development for additional information. Case Number CAM14-00355 Description building permit with wetland delineation Last Name GREEN Received Date 6/12/2014 11:31:34 AM No Images Case Number CAM14-00235 Description vegetation removal and wetlands in back of property AL Last Name RICHARDSON Received Date 4/16/2014 2:28:17 PM No Images Case Number SEP89-00362 Description Last Name GREEN Received Date 8/26/2002 Images Case Number SOM89-00362 Description Last Name GREEN Received Date 3/19/1992 No Images Jefferson county r 9 HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH i Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppquery/cm.asp?value=821265017 9/9/2014 lir CONSISTENCY REVIElli Project Planner: Master#M LA14-00071 Review Type Project Description d rvv-i 13a is ZON14-00036 STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA CLEAR 2 ACRES OF A 3 ACRE PARCEL OF TIMER FOR FUTURE SFR Primary: MICHAEL J RICHARDSON Site Address: BRIDGET A KAMINSKI- BYWATER WAY 2034 W VALLEY RD WA, CHIMACUM WA 98325-9746 Project Location: WHITE ROCK COE TRACTS DIV II TRACT 5 W/PTN OS V10/P105 Parcel Number: 821265017 S-T-R: 26-28N-1 E Total Acreage 3 Legal Description WHITE ROCK COVE TRACTS DIV II TRACT 5 W/PTN Land Use: 9100 OS V10/P105 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 8 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: .chool D 49 Zoning: QV. 5 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: .'> S COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES y No [ ] ESA's: Special Reports earby YES [ ] Designated Ag YES 4 [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES `a [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability:40P NO .S f 4 bLe__, ,'J oli")f Stream Type:YES O FWHCA: YES Wetlands: NO _0_4* , � I. . - •`' _. • Rare Plants:YES a b r,�te�n — JJ''f-1 bah. /LLZ .U; A Seismic: YES ICI Lfrr�� Landslide: YES 4f6 Flood: YES Erosion: YES Aquifer Rechar.e AreaCE NO SIPZ: 0161F5 At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Mo s - ate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan s I itted: o [ ] Forest Lands: YES elt Adjoining Forest Lands: IUD Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES ere [ ] Agricultgral Lands: YES Mt; [ ] Archaeology: YES [ ] No Shooting Zone: YES O' [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Q Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 En eering ' [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclos :Airport vEs of MRL YES g Forest Lands YES ro [ ] Landscaping Required: Ye • [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other I- 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: 00/4 LSHA Setback: NM [ ] Road Classification: Pl^►V pt) e_ Road Approach: E TING NoT�O RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YE EXEMPT t1/430-h (Q,A I /2111 ,-- DIU s i Ss U 1 [ ] Flood Certificate: N het [ ] Existing Case(s)& .I dition(s): ( /3_0210 CAl Violations: Yes • • [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: 3u/t/5 f q N/ AFN , S3 G! Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance �� [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YE f su b 'tted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreem YES NO, submitted: YES (NO 1 [ ] Site Visit conducted YES) NO 0 [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in P- I' lan N/A -Qr( W e: 6�nt Special Reports Scanned N/A 0 \X)A2k�a �� rpCw'}" INo parcel tags found for parcel I Associated CASES status issued finaled description 821265017 CAM 14-00235 M 10/14/2014 vegetation removal and wetlands in back of property CAM14-00355 M 6/12/2014 building permit with wetland delineation MLA14-00071 ZON14-00036 P STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA CLEAR 2 ACRES OF A 3 ACRE PARCEL OF TIMER FOR FUTURE SFR SEP89-00362 F 7/17/1989 3/19/1992 S0M89-00362 RCR 5/27/2014 I,