Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2010-00009
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: GEORGE HERION 10716 S BALTIMORE RD SPOKANE WA 992239544 DATE ISSUED:July 20,2010 DATE EXPIRES:July 20,2015 MLA NUMBER:MLA10-00025 PROJECT PLANNER:Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SPAAD No Rd Approach Required -Already Existing. Assigned Address only. SPAAD-Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for residential development PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 332 030, Section 33, Township 29N, Range 1E, WM, located off Bayview Dr, Port Ludlow 98365 CONDITIONS: 1.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five (5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five(5)year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval-Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 2.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 3.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR AN AT RISK SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. b. Installation of a flow meter. c. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. d. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the County per monitoring program. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 4.) MANDATORY MEASURES OF HIGH RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 5.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR HIGH RISK SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: a. Variance from Chapter 173 WAC standards granted by Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea-salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline); or for an existing or proposed groundwater well not subject to an Ecology variance, applicant provide evidence through a hydrogeologic assessment(relevant components of an Aquifer Recharge Area Report per UDC 3.6.10.e) of a reasonable probability that the subject aquifer will not be degraded by the proposed use of well. b. Installation of a flow meter. c. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. d. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the County per monitoring program. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 6.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures(per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 7.) A flow meter shall be installed prior to final sign off of the building permit. 8.) On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration is required. The property owner shall allow access to Jefferson County PUD or approved contractor to take samples as required. 9.) A Geotechnical Report dated October 1, 2009 prepared by Zenovic&Associates was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. 10.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the approved Eagle Habitat Management Plan. 11.) A stormwater management plan shall be prepared and submitted at time of building permit application and shall comply with the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction, to address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of a stormwater and drainage control system. 12.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 13.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 14.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 15.) Minimum setback from North Bayview Drive right-of-way shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from top of shoreline bank is as follows: The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty(30)feet or one(1)foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet.ide yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum setback from top of shoreline bank 16.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 17.) Pre-existing legal lots of record less than one acre in size in rural residential districts are subject to the stormwater requirements in Chapter 18.30 JCC and must meet the"Area of Impervious Surface Coverage"to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the administrator. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface, which includes rooftops, driveways, concrete, etc. 18.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 19.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 20.) The applicant shall apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Exemption for any accessory structures or at the time of a building permit for the addition to the single-family residence. 21.) Residential developers and individual builders shall be required to preserve shoreline vegetation and reduce the associated risk of erosion during construction and any future activity which may impact the stability of the shoreline. 22.) The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building permit application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water. 23.) The proposal is located within 200 feet of Ordinary High Water Mark, and is within shoreline jurisdiction per the Shoreline Master Program, Chapter 18.25 Jefferson County Code. The remainder of the parcel, landward of 200 feet from Ordinary High Water Mark is located outside of shoreline jurisdiction and is subject to the Growth Management Act and critical area codes under chapter 18.22 Jefferson County Code. 24.) Maintaining ground cover will help reduce erosion from surface runoff. Any bare areas that develop should be revegetated. Native low growing vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be the most beneficial 25.) Tree limbs, lawn clippings, etc. should not be thrown over the bluff because these piles have a tendency to damage/kill the underlying vegetation which in turn increases the erosion potential of the bluff soils. These piles also add unnecessary weight to the bluff soils, especially when saturated with water. 26.) Silt fences or other sediment control devices may be needed during construction such that sedimentation off site does not significantly exceed predevelopment conditions. Standard erosion control best management practices (BMP's) should be utilized as necessary to prevent erosion and off-site runoff. Temporary stabilization might include silt fences and/or hay bails or straw waddles staked with rebar. Permanent stabilization might include replanting, mulching or gravel. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage system design approval. 3.) Any removal or disturbance of soil in the area evaluated may create site conditions that are unacceptable for the installation of an onsite sewage system and may invalidate this approval. 4.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 15, 2010 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: conservancy shoreline designation; eagle; stable/intermediate shoreline slope stability. 5.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 6.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge(primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 7.) The parcel is located within an At Risk SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polic} (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. An At Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L (milligrams per liter). 8.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L). 9.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 10.) The revised site plan dated January 28, 2010 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated July 20, 2010 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 11.) This approval is for a SPAAD only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 12.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 13.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Unified Development Code (Section 8.7). The criteria for approval is as follows: 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state, and federal land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the provisions of the Unified Development Code. Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code, Comprehensive Plan, and Shoreline Master Program. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewerage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment: The parcels total approximately5.25 acres, and the revised site plan dated as submitted on January 27, 2010 complies with UDC Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. Environmental Health reviewed the revised site plan for consistency and the soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage system design approval. The parcel will be served by a two-party well. Potable water is required at time of building permit application. The SPAAD does not vest for potable water. The approved site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. Sections JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070 of the Jefferson County Code requires the project applicant prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction, to address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow due to the application as proposed identifies the parcel as utilizing a well. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting. Application of Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source and storage. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing the provisions contained within Section 8 of this Code and Chapter 43.21 C RCW. Staff comment: Single family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four(4) dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 14.) Due to a recent Washington State Supreme Court Case: Futurewise v. WA State DOTED, Ecology, Case #80396-0, the Critical Areas Ordinance(Chapter 18.22, JCC)does not apply to development within Shoreline jurisdiction. Only the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program (Chapter 18.25, JCC)applies to development within 200 feet of the OHWM. 15.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developinc adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. C'(.4Z 7/e-AE) "dministrator MLA10-00025 5 of 5 ---..,„\ _s7/ 0 \ • co ED \ \,--2.• \..,........-- X Or . .. IJ4/N n ,C.71 C F'� ♦ i:�i'� 1� N '� ♦♦ . �'.z r.',� � ♦ � i • w• _ EU cn v _ !m 3 m ? ► 3 �i m S� v I .°'•s" °a ♦♦1 ( I 8 3 0D I !♦ N l �� 4 • 1 I E hA' .1% ►i. ► �, —, — 4 3 a.— -0 — /1/1 0 7 0 3 ° a A O3Z cF 0)c \ca x a- r• 33 $ 5i // .♦ 4.111 ii 0 co m � c ♦! { /// ie ♦♦ 2 7 3 o.-°.. °'°" is / $31 a \ i• N i . i , ,4 •z 11: - i ( 0; I ♦. \ 0 I . i A .+ 4/ i . 4 *the$ - \,s N. - , :::.; 0 ot _ !: O , � ° i N I,° y' a 7 .0 7 A:* r11:114 \'' \ VI M k :\ \ \ 2 . 4 sv,1 c3)11 : z a, 0 a, 0 Ca CD ,-, 11014.. _, ., '. \. :1,' M / 41,'•\ \ 9 N co f� ♦+ \ ►♦1 w ED m z ►. ��� ►� (� Q• rN few ,. �� _ \'.;„` t a ■/ ..:;f;p 7.: , `�! p,- to a ''`. ♦+ �1\fir`Z r .�:+ 1....-s 9. ��, m 3 v rid\ A 1� mg `■ /, :j' cr .... * ` 0w 1 3 J S i.fig. mI A�, 3 - m ... 0 1 100\ Ztr7 :04 6 lioN $011 / . '..."7- ,,,..,.. 111111.0.■,...- / i ( ..---- C> , 1 ------ HI / / \ - d CD al a , and � ' � vo N p �` ( / J ? 2! r/ ..i. ' /TZ � � !� •. Cop m- - � O cup DDO � � _ • su IVgi Cp Cn �N � _ / / , p1 N N r Tp \ O) NNi,„ O Ern CD W / i *N;ls,- ____ CO / / _---- - CD cii ._.._ --'' to! \ '\.,. ./ ,.• .. \ m -a CD r fJ MCA. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act(RCW 77.12.655) and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules(WAC 232-12-292) Not for Subdivisions, Short Plats,or Conversions Eagle Territory: Olele Point Occurrence: 117 Nest#: 2 Proposed Activity: Jefferson Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination CONDITIONS: All known bald eagle nest trees(active or alternate) and winter roost sites are protected. The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: X CONDITION 1: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch trees, all native conifers and all black cottonwood trees >24 inches diameter at breast height (diameter 4.5 feet from ground, known as d.b.h). Also retain>50% of coniferous and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest tree. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. E CONDITION 2: This parcel is located >400 feet and < 800 feet or within '/z mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline: Retain all known perch trees, and 75% native conifers and cottonwoods >24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above condition placed on Parcel # 921332030 with a street address of Lot C . If the conditions set forth above are acceptable, please sign below and this will serve as your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. / Agaimaitr / °/- • 14,A, \r-. o v, \ Ll�. 1c DFW Reg anal Wildlife anager Landowner Signature (Date) i L i i AMY .y \r/.. ,G i� City/ ounty Official* ' (Date) Address`, to 5,3l..1 1--`p'i,. -S po V)0,14..,_, 1AD 4-9 q tC5 Send Copy To:WDFW City. State.Zip Wildlife Resource Data Sys 0:0 1 .:; "V d3 1 p Q 600 Capitol Way N 7� -[ O- ` Olympia,WA 98501-1091 Phone d ,� :.. ., ��mw�L ...,�u..�� �' '�� �� , ,� �.. .?e .,.4.,, ,,u � z . ;�_ � a. mss; & ASSOCIATES 301 East 6th Street,Suite 1 mum)- Q� Port Angeles,Washington 98362 INCORPORATED (360)417-0501 Fax(360)417-0514 E-mail:zenovic @olympus.net October 5, 2009 Mr. George Herion 10716 South Baltimore Road Spokane, WA 99223-9544 Re: Property on North Bayview Drive, Mats Mats Bay Area, Jefferson County Par. No. 921-332-030 Dear Mr. Herion: Zenovic&Associates, Inc. presents herein the results of our geotechnical review of the referenced property, located on the west side of Admiralty Inlet, approximately 1.5 miles north of Port Ludlow, Jefferson County. The property is situated just north of the inlet to Mats Mats Bay. Access to the property is from North Bayview Drive, at the east end of Mats Mats Beach Road,just east of Oak Bay Road. We understand that your intent is to construct a single-family residence on the subject property. The bank from the upland area on the site to the beach has been mapped as Intermediate Slope in the Washington Coastal Zone Atlas and the Jefferson County Shoreline Map. Intermediate slopes are typically slopes greater than 30 percent with no known failed areas but are susceptible to failure if altered by grading activities. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the geotechnical review is to provide information regarding the soil and slope stability in order to develop the site in a manner that will not induce soil erosion or endanger on-site or adjacent off-site properties, consistent with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (JCC Chapter 18.22). The scope of the review included a field inspection of the site and determination of site and adjacent property slopes using a hand-held clinometer. No topographic mapping services have been provided by this office. Research of available data included a review of aerial photos as provided on the Jefferson County website (1994, 2000, 2006), the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (USDA/SCS, August, 1975), the Washington State Coastal Zone Atlas, and Jefferson County Unified Development Code. Page 2 Mr. George Herion - Property on North Bayview Drive, Jefferson County October 5, 2009 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC AND SOIL CONDTIONS According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, General Soil Map, a significant area comprised of the Alderwood-Sinclair soil association extends south and east from Discovery Bay to the Admiralty Inlet/Hood Canal shoreline, encompassing the majority of the easterly portion of Jefferson County, including the Dabob and Coyle peninsulas. The subject site is located in the extreme northeasterly portion of the mapped soil association. The Alderwood-Sinclair soils are typically moderately well-drained, dominantly strongly sloping to steep, gravelly soils underlain by glacial till. Inspection of the soil maps of the site indicate that the property lies within an extensive area of Olete very gravelly silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, that extends along the west side of Admiralty Inlet around the inlet to Mats Mats Bay. The Olete soils are formed in the old basalt flows that have been uplifted from the sea bottom. Typically, the surface soils are typically 20" to 30" deep. SITE OBSERVATIONS An engineer from Zenovic&Associates, Inc. conducted a site visit on September 22, 2009 to observe the site slopes, vegetation, surface and immediate subsurface hydrology, and evaluate in-situ soils for density. Existing Slopes The easterly half of the site slopes downhill consistently from west to east at an estimated slope of 20-25 percent to the top of a marine bluff approximately 35 feet high. The bluff is a nearly vertical slope comprised of the basalt bedrock that underlies the site. The westerly portion of the site slopes downhill at a slope of around 25% in a northeasterly direction from a high point near the southwest corner or the property to a generally level area along the north line of the property. The topography of the site is such that minimal storm water runoff from adjacent properties enters the site. Soil Conditions Visual observation of the site indicates that the site soils appear to be consistently the Olete very gravelly silt loam throughout the site. Test pit excavations completed throughout the site show the tan to reddish surface soils with roots extending to the basalt bedrock at depths ranging from 12" to 30". No erosion of surface soils was observed in the areas previously cleared for roadway access. . Page 3 Mr. George Herion - Property on North Bayview Drive, Jefferson County October 5, 2009 Vegetation The site vegetation consists of moderately dense stand of fir, cedar, madrona, red alder, and big leaf maple trees. Understory vegetation is a dense mat of salal and sword fern, with extensive areas of nettles where soils have been disturbed by prior minor site clearing. Hydrology and Drainage As noted previously, the site is situated such that no upgradient areas drain onto and through the site. The surface soils above the restrictive layer were generally dry. The silt loam soils hold about 2"to 4" of water available for plants. The subsurface basalt layer appears to slope in a manner similar to the ground surface so no perched water is present. Due to the shallow soils depth, infiltration of storm water runoff is not the preferred alternative for storm water runoff control for the site. Discharge of runoff onto the face of the exposed basalt face of the marine bluff is acceptable for this site. International Building Code Site and Soil Categorization Seismic design parameters for this site include a seismic zone soil profile of Type D in accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the International Building Code. The native surficial site soils can be classified as a sand, silty sand, clayey sand, silty gravel, and clayey gravel consistent with Class 4 materials as set forth in Table 1804.2 of the International Building Code. Increases for depth and width as set forth in the table footnotes are not recommended for this site due to the site slopes and potential for soil saturation. Excavation though the surficial soils to the substantial basalt bedrock layer below may allow for increased soil bearing capacity. CONCLUSIONS Based on my review of the site, adjacent properties, and available data, it is my opinion that the soils on the site are stable. The underlying basalt bedrock is not susceptible to erosion from wave and tidal action of Admiralty Inlet, so the potential of failure of the steep slope along the shoreline is minimal. The upland slopes and soil conditions combine to minimize the potential of slope erosion when adequately vegetated. A setback equal to the bluff height, or approximately 35 feet, is appropriate for this site. RECOMMENDATIONS General The proposed project shall be constructed in conformance with all requirements of Jefferson County, including, but not limited to, the International Building Code and applicable clearing, grading, drainage, and erosion control requirements. Page 4 Mr. George Herion - Property on North Bayview Drive, Jefferson County October 5, 2009 Excavation and Grading Excavation for the proposed foundation components of any structures on the site shall be carried to firm, substantial, unyielding subsoil, at a depth of not less than 12 inches below the existing surface grade. Extending the excavation depth to the underlying bedrock will result in a substantially better foundation system. Excavation work shall occur not earlier than March 1, and shall be complete to the permanent condition before October 15. Drainage and Erosion Control Drainage facilities shall be provided that collect all storm water runoff from all impervious surfaces on the site and direct the runoff over the top of the bluff and onto the basalt bedrock at the base of the bluff. Runoff from pollution generating surfaces, such as driveways and parking areas, shall have appropriate pre-treatment to protect the marine environment. As an alternative, storm water runoff may be directed to appropriately sized infiltration trench located not less than 100 feet from the top of the bluff. Slope Maintenance Proper maintenance of the existing marine bluff is critical to the continued safety of the site and for minimizing damage to the bluff. No organic material, including grass clippings and tree or brush trimmings should be thrown over the top of the bluff. These materials may help hold water on the slope, thereby reducing slope stability. On-site Sewage Disposal System Drainfield If an on-site sewage disposal system is required for this site, the on-site sewage disposal drainfield shall be located as far as practical from the shoreline, but shall be not less than 100 feet from the top of the bank. The drainfield shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the permit for the system, as approved by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. Septic tanks, pump chambers, and collection and transport piping shall be placed not less than 50 feet from the top of the bank. All systems components shall be water-tight; piping within recommended setback area shall be tested for leaks prior to cover. USE OF THIS REPORT This report has been prepared at the request of Mr. George Herion for the purpose of determining the relative stability of a marine bluff on the subject property. This report is specific to this site and the information contained herein is the property of the Mr. Herion and may not be used without his permission. Page 5 Mr. George Herion - Property on North Bayview Drive, Jefferson County October 5, 2009 The findings set forth in the report are based on a site inspection and review of available data. The conclusions and recommendations derived from these findings assume that the site conditions do not vary radically throughout the site. If future excavations and/or construction activities discover that site conditions are significantly different than those documented herein, Zenovic&Associates, Inc. must be contacted to verify or modify the conclusions, as appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information to you. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the contents. Sincerely, Zen•vic&Associates, Inc. =t-'phen M. Zenovic, P.E. P ncipal Engineer Enclosures Fc: JN 09232 Cc: Waves Waterfront Properties/Barbara Blowers w/enc. Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 921332030 05/14/2007 Owner Mailing Address: GEORGE HERION 10716 S BALTIMORE RD SPOKANE WA 992239544 Site Address: Section: 33 School District: Chimacum(49) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: - Port Ludlow(3) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Port Ludlow(7) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S33 T29 R1E I TAX 31 WITH EASE © No Photo Available http://www.co jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NCM21332030... 9/21/2009 ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 ,. ,.... 1 97g'inama®116°179717,4!‘-10-'1 977400926 9774001327 977400025 1 I 977400019 97740003 971400031 9714020 _ --...__E......— 921332001 977400032 ---J------ 2 ' I 97740002 _.,_.,.. F ....------ t, \ 977400022 k- ____,,, 11 9774130024 2, i, t ' '; V}, 1 --, ....„-■ -::--------------- 97140024 , t ■ 1 1 921332002 11 921332002 i 1 — ,. 92 1 133 92i332030 , 9213330 2030 I 921332033 921332029 921332029 1 1 921332035 H 1 921332032 1 s fit 113-yview Or ...L..... 1 1 .-11j -i 921332032 1 921332012 921332023 I h - T________, lei 921332017„,_„,....,,__ 921332036 1 1 921332013 1332016 l'41444‘1144 „ii 1 921332017 _ 921 11 1 .„,------------- 921332026 i 1 _ I 92133201 ...te .... _ 91332114 1 1 93'1332010 ...,,,,,,`' 11.1w r 1 921332008 1 _,...,,,,.. f .. 22_..31 1 o••••••• _- 11002 ( 921333002 .s., 644'%Ic gith.AW kV'115117,1S°"Carat".Cen"i„.8°r`6°'s t2lb ift'CSCbteSta.0 R.;s INA n-p 10/5/2009 http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrarne.htin ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 . . I,- ) ii . . ir / . , _,,/ 1, 11_.... , \, - ( '-, __---- 1 \ I ( i , c_ (---1, , --_,. ---, -.....) 1 , ___ -( _—...„., "'"- -----s---- -------_ ,,\..„ r I ' _.,---,-- , / 0 ...., 7----1 92i332002 i ( (• / I i \ 1 1 ( 1' I ---, \ \ ' .1, \.„,,..„:,,,, N, \ \ 1\ / ( \ .1 ,) j ), ,------, '*--s, \ \ 'N., \'\,\'‘,,, ( IC ,,\▪ 1\ ,--- , .'"-- 1 --''92: 33203°-\''-'"---\-----L----------------------_-----9;;332(')'30 '---------------\' \\'‘\'S':::":M --_ I ,"----- II ,i /I ,,t 1 / ,, 60 1 'I ' „ ' / ( ) I) 4' ,.... , --. ---- ,----- ''''', 111 (1' / k ( //I ' T ---r---- t ...,,, 11 ‘ '''' I Ill i 1 / / 11 ,.. * ' ',921332029, \ 921332029,, 1 (//;01,11/1 I 7--- ,/ .// ) ■ ( _." /i ( I , , \ c',..„ I's, ..,-.., I i ' Wily" .' ,--- ) ) / i / i ( ,, „...„:„, ,,, ,, ../. ..., / , \ - .,.., , „ ) ) \ ,..,921332032 .......- ..., ",/ \ ~„, ',-,- -__„---' - -,_,- - ..„--' / ,,,,-- ,.., ,,, 1 ) i i t'1 it,1\ 1 \ ''''''--- '''''''''.---------. ..-." „i'. ,..----- _____-/ -/ ,..,/ j I 1. , k, --'7F---M -,--''''' c'' ,/,„------- - 921332032' ,r I 1 i 1 921332012 921332023, --' _.,......---1,./ , ../ ., 4z, ////'./11 r."" i ...,..,, ........' '. .0.- ' .. " '''' I I ''''; .... 921332018 - ''' ,,) l 1 16_-----921332017A ..- --' 9213320 921332017- ---'":,-----"„-:;- -------- --,'' --- __------- 1 is, ...1.---- .--,: ---.,..,,,,,.--„-;:,--;1„..,-- .......00,-- 92- 3-2°-1';92 -''''' --- r — -- -ig.- ------_,2 ____ ..-- aacied, ift-■•••••••-iyi latossaTcoati cento7straces- Gts 01010110101011 t-1-m -1-ofoc.040t-Pti•I U.I DeVii) 142.01^4. %11:51P1Fetaa01Q CiD•3 id N'Y We -e 10/5/2009 http://maps.coefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrame.htm ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2„,.w . , it ik, , 7.4,..., , ,,,,,,,,,ist.:1,,,, i :,, , , Pi .4_,..vintit,,,,, tsh 6 .., ,, a .. i / : Y i ,« � � l ir- 0 #, .. 4 _t Y, 4 . 4104,* ,.* fm I ' . itz fr r r r { -, let* '01 \\\ - ii€—"--4/7 -:� - ` ,'. j/ r .„% .....1- - r iv., iimir -N-4, „-. - (41' - Ij f PP* it,% - r s 5 w �`'~ `) ,,,., .. - c At . ... , 1 .,-,,,e, ...... ..., ...,4.. , IV -1P. et t „my 77 __LI 40” / _ s---,.., ,,..----------(- lop" ,s,„ , ,LIALit___7 ,p. • r d Sx-ra A-imu.l '2Woro -Z00(. RICP A. JArRFt32)0.) t.,0c.9 wa'r+( v-0.704.t'r http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrame.htm 10/5/2009 AreIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 . . i ( 1( ) I 7.......--too \'---...,. ' .1 1 , ,, 7 Si..213320a2 / / ( . ( 1 if , , CI4IL I ' .„., 1\ S42133.2030. —-----' -: rM.- 'ei'312L 3'4 C-- ).7. \ 1 11 \ 49.." , 1, I \ I ) , I I 1 1 I (II/ .2.:::2,== (''.-- - / / 921332029 f /1/ 1• ■, ; ,I ?I / , k ' \ . i..2'33203!: t l/ . '; \ ) r 92'332C'2 \\\ :14'2.iz E: ...,' / , 2 232C 32 •I i i .......><.------- ..-.P" . 3320$e 92133201/ - -- _______—----- 921332017 ----- ..-------1 -----::: 921332015 .4... .9211321110 921112011_-_-----=---z---=-17-77----4----7: .„........... .-------- ----- ..-e" ./.-------.---"--"-------„,------ Uwe.moguls:lb)Jelic-,x.ri L'cla t, :‘,...-1.a.S..,.. ,:-...., -,:',„. ,3'Trt.......,'- 1 . „ S MO(le 4-11,4--e-- St...O0c- :.1,A6,1L,i Ty IAA RIP 1 R.Lvtik cae-F7-St-6o...1 iD44 http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrame.htm 10/5/2009 Page 1 of T.■ \ • - ':1 ,.. 1 .S---s 1 @ , Hi t" , S \ , / 1 \ / . 4 1 Or , A. ..,.. I Scale 1:24.000 Miles .Ur 1 1 ks _ F--- -__.Thlommon■Ii--..---.-1 1 1,, --OM 500 1000 1500 MOM, -I L, in ,,Z::=:•■••=•:=*."'"'-1.7". 1••■•■••■,t 41,fa.r.••••■•••ie...11.... il' II.' iftrIk*ame bvsneas.”011.1.....1., sow*,....r.............1. ■..■......-t A4C)112.WWWIL:.; GLOP9a it'ribrk)t. .t 11 "444n0 r.,074,"." 1046 Whojea,rekNa egitA.S ISAT....* 4:C1.5-4IS A91.14:5 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/femaweb/Jefferson/JE 7iith.jpg 9/22/2009 '34 SOIL SURVEY slow to ponded, and the hazard of water erosion is slight or 2 to 4 inches of water available for plants. Runoff is slow to nonexistent. A seasonal water table is at a depth of 0 to 12 medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moder- inches. ate. This soil is used mainly for growing pasture and truck This soil is used mainly for production of trees and for crops. Capability unit IIw-2; not assigned to a woodland wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit VIe-1; group. woodland group 3d2. Olete very gravelly silt loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes Olete Series (OeE).—This steep soil is on upland slopes in rough, broken country that has basalt outcrops and escarpments present The Olete series consists of well-drained, very gravelly in places. soils underlain by basalt bedrock at a depth of 20 to 30 Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. inches. These soils are on rough, broken uplands. Slopes This soil is used for production of trees and for wildlife range from 0 to 90 percent. Elevation ranges from slightly habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit VIe-1; wood- above sea level to about 1,000 feet. These soils formed in land group 3d2. weathered basalt under Douglas-fir, western redcedar, red Olete-Alderwood complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes alder, madrone, rhododendron, and salal. Annual precipita- (01D).—This mapping unit is made up of about 60 percent tion is about 28 to 32 inches.The average annual air tempera- Olete very gravelly silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, and 40 ture is 50°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from percent Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent about 190 to 230 days, and the above 28°F growing season slopes. The Olete soil is rolling to hilly, and the Alderwood ranges from about 200 to 260 days. These soils are associated soil is undulating to gently rolling. with Ahl, Alderwood, Clallam, Everett, Grove, Hoodsport, The soils of this complex are used mostly for production of and Triton soils, trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Small In a representative profile the upper 3 inches of the soil areas of the Alderwood soil are used as permanent and sum- is dark reddish-brown very gravelly silt loam. Below this, mer rural homesites and for growing pasture, hay, berries, to a depth of 18 inches, is dusky-red very gravelly silt loam. fruit, and vegetables. Capability unit VIe-1; woodland Beneath this, and extending to a depth of 24 inches, is group 3d2. weak-red very stony silt loam that is 80 percent or more Olete-Clallam complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes coarse basalt gravel and stones. This material is underlain (Om D).—This mapping unit is made up of about 60 percent by basalt bedrock, which is generally fractured. Rounded Olete very gravelly silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, and 40 pebbles and angular basalt stones are scattered throughout percent Clallam gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes. these soils. The Olete soil is rolling to hilly, and the Clallam soil is un- Olete soils are almost entirely wooded, but a few acres are dulating to gently rolling. used for rural homesites. The soils of this complex are used mostly for production of Olete very gravelly silt loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Small (OeD).—This nearly level to hilly soil is in areas of upland areas of the Clallam soils are used for permanent and sum- slopes. Most slopes range from 10 to 20 percent. mer rural homesites and for growing pasture,hay,vegetables, Representative profile 0.5 mile south of Knapp farm and fruit, and berries. Capability unit VIe-1; woodland group 0.25 mile west of State Highway 9E; on logging road 150 3d2. yards southwest of basalt rock quarry in SW%NE1/SW% Olete-Hoodsport complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes sec. 19, T. 28 N., R. 1 E.: (OpD).—This mapping unit is made up of about equal 01-2 inches to 1 inch,leaves, needles, and twigs. proportions of Olete very gravelly silt loam, 0 to 30 percent 02-1 inch to 0,decomposed leaves,needles,and twigs. slopes, and Hoodsport very gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 B21ir-0 to 3 inches,dark reddish-brown(2.5YR 3/4)very gravelly percent slopes.The Olete soil is rolling to hilly,and the Hoods- silt loam, weak red (2.5YR 5/2) dry;moderate,very fine and port soil is undulating to gently rolling. fine, granular structure; hard, very friable, slightly sticky, nonelastic; many fine and medium roots; 55 percent angular The soils of this complex are used mainly for production pebbles;slightly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. (2 to 6 inches of trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Cap- thick) ability unit VIe-1; woodland group 3d2. B22ir-3 to 18 inches, dusky-red (2.5YR 3/2) very gravelly silt Olete-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent slopes loam,pale red(2.5YR 6/2)dry;massive;hard,friable,slightly OrF .—This mapping unit is made up of about 50 to 70 sticky, nonplastic; common fine roots; 65 percent angular ( ) pP g P pebbles; slightly acid; gradual, irregular boundary. (10 to 16 percent of an Olete very gravelly silt loam and 30 to 50 inches thick) percent basalt stones and Rock outcrop. C-18 to 24 inches, weak-red (2.5YR 4/2) very stony silt loam, Runoff is very rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is pale red (2.5YR 6/2) dry; massive; hard, friable, slightly sticky, nonplastic; 80 percent coarse fragments;slightly acid; very severe. This complex is used mainly for production of clear, irregular boundary. (2 to 8 inches thick) trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Capability R-24 inches, basalt bedrock, unit Vlls-1; woodland group 3d2. Depth to basalt bedrock ranges from 20 to 30 inches. The B horizons range from dark reddish brown to dusky red. Gravel and stones in the B horizons range from 50 to 80 percent. In the C Phelan Series horizon texture is silt loam or loam.This horizon is 75 to 90 percent coarse gravel and stones.Basalt stones and cobbles are in the A and The Phelan series consists of moderately well drained, B horizons in places. gravelly soils that have a very slowly permeable cemented Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of layer at a depth of 10 to 20 inches.The soils formed in glacial Rock outcrop and shallow soils. till on stream and river valley side slopes in the western This soil is well drained. Permeability is moderate. Roots Olympic foothill areas. Slopes range from 30 to 80 percent. penetrate to a depth of 20 to 30 inches. This soil holds about Elevation ranges from about 200 to 1,000 feet.Native vegeta- V. ArcIMS Viewer Page 1 of 2 / ___,-----;•-•."-- DO '.------::::—., „.------------Zi • -,--, \• •,,„ ' '.• ,,z, / 921332002 \ 2 , I 921332002(, i t' • II 7 7/ I ill CI <- ( I'. ,',I'--• '''- .,I'..,\, \ / ) '''l \ ., ., .,. --.., -... •, , —r----1—/I 1---- ) ''-- // 7/./—:---4-- II,,,_:_ '•i -',.1_, •. " .„. -_. ...-_i-.\.,. i --/ / I ------7y / T------,:.--•,'N . i i __ / i 1 , ...._ '921332039 I --...\I---. • ------ ./ -I-., I •• `-‘, '---.•--- •••----,_ \-• •I•-• / ! I ‘ II \\ '',-,„,-.•,--,- ,,,,,,„..,:_:, ..,.,_\,...,,, .. 1------ -Iv II, I, j ,.---" t : „. „. / i ) ) \, VI .,,, ,,, , ‘„, '--- - C'-'- ' ----''' :‘...,' ''' '' , ,. ,,---.1 ,.. , , . '921332029• ,, 150 , . — • i ' ‘ / I i / lk''' ` • l' '421332036 \ \ ,, / t _ . / i_____/ 's ,•,! \ ••• • „\:,,,..\\ ' I'---, \ ) \,, -----..921332032 ) il f Ic,.. \ -----------I---/ ,---"/ -----/ 7-- _, 1 ''-----' ' • --- i i I I, ' -----. ----__ \ I _ __-- -- / '1 921332012 '' ---- 921332026 „•-• „..,.•921332032 ' -r---- - t --- I1 ------.' -- .• , .- --'r . • , . „ . . i ' :'■ ' , I kC I.----- ,. .....= , ,..z•: f, , ' ----m---1 - 921332017-- I•-••••-7.---..- ..— --,..7.--:--_. ,, — -:`,„ .I 02t4320ii-, _ .:-------_____--- , • , , ._.„.„,,,_. ,_,,.. ,,s.• .:: - • ...-- k- - - - -- '.'4" ;;.:,,,''' '1,,,•.::,.. i-':.,. :-,-.-..,, . '-•:::,-..; o• - Topoc.12-A-Ptitc--- iikAA-PPAX (“Dgke) w/ Sot4-s OA 60 Pikt, Fltevv■ ,,J er-cm-f2iS6t.3 cart1/4r,r/ tx..i.eriti-re http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/MapFrame.htm 10/1/2009 1 MLA# to "a -) APP Submitted _• e , . CASE# 1 c�- k O--a-G\ - C Q W)-ck Assigned Planner I Issued: ' • SPAAD•.Category and Intake Requirements BETA•version Rev. 12/12/2006 • Cat A Cat B Cat C Cat D (low risk) Potential Probable Mitigation and ' site constraints. site constraints State review reqd .• *Special reports are *`Special reports **Pre-application ' " optional at Intake. If. required at intake. . to • •reports are deemed Could request determine submittal • required,the 30 day • waiver from intake requirements • timeline will not be requirements at pre- rnet. .application. •*Need to provide • • additional • . Information on site • . • • • - plan >200 feet from • . .(1)Shoreline • • : (1)Shoreline parcel boundary depicted less than ro ShoreLtnes • 200 feet away'from• prop doesn't • • parcel boundary,or -eet standard • (2)shoreline on site. . setbacks and/or Strew q"s , proposing mitgation •: .• •>155 feet from`parcel ,_) °( Stream depicted- . Development boundary off site and less.than • . T 1' 155'away from " • proposed less than parcel bound 155'from stream cry,or. ' • . (2)on site • >155 feet from parcel (1)Stream depicted . . . • " Development • boundary . off site and less than - proposed less than Type 2 " 1.55'away from 165'from stream parcel boundary,or. (2)on.site" • ->105 feet train parcel` (1)Stream depicted ' - •Development boundary off site and less than . Type 3 105'away from proposed less than " 105 from stream parcel boundary, (2)on site >105 feet from parcel "(1)Stream depicted. boundary � Development . ry . off site and less than . proposed less than Type 4 . 105'away from. ' • 105'from stream parcel boundary, or (2)on site >55 feet from parcel (1)Stream depicted Development boundary off site and less than proposed less than Type 5 55'away from parcel 55'from stream boundary, or(2)on site Full& none ' Depicted on site Wildlife(other � )(f3j **Include agency than Eagle) packet with 6 applicaton Eagle(contact. none ' Depicted on site DCD to q **Include agency determine) packet with application • • at A Cat B • Cat C Cat D • • • (low risk) Potential Probable Mitigation and site constraints site'constraints State review reqd *Special reports are **Special reports **Pre-application. • optional at intake. If required at intake. required to - reports'are deemed. Could request determine submittal • required,the 30 day waiver from intake requirements • . . timeline will not be requirements at pre- met. application. .*Need to provide • additional information•on site plan • . ->225 from parcel 'Wetlands depicted . Depicted on site • Wetlands •boundary off site and less than '"Wetland . • lVl • 225'away*Wetland- delineation required - delineation.optional. . • • • ..Depicted off site .Depicted on site • Seismic • • *Geotechnical report optional •. •none Low or moderate (1)High landslide • hazard mapped on hazard depicted on •site or within 30 feet site or within 100 Landslide from parcel ' feet•of parcel hazard area . • • boundary . •. •boundary,or(2) . *Geotechnical report• .verified slides •optional • •**Geotechnicai • • .• -- • repgrt.required • •• none • ntennediate on site' Unstable;unstable • ' • n• • recent landslide; •• b• . .parcel boundary unstable old • • • Shoreline *Geotechnical report• landslide depicted • •• Slope Stability optional - on Site or within 100 feet of parcel boundary`** • • - • / •Geotechnical,report required . one Depicted on site Flood • . *Flood Elevation -• Certificate;optional • '>30 feet from parcel (1)Depicted off site ' - boundary and less than 30 feet.pc Erosion • away,or(2)on site *Geotechnical report .. optional • Aquifer • Any Recharge. Area (1)None v 'ig Risk•SIPZ High Risk SI-Z Seawater • Coastal. , -: "'• n 11 .depicted on site • _ • - Intrusion .SIPZ on - feet of parcel **Hydrogeologic Protection rotection boundary Assessment S Zone .*Hydrogeologic required • Assessment optional • WIe / J a,t7+S r. Ato j (JO Ok / V V WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act (RCW 77.12.655) and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules(WAC 232-12-292) Not for Subdivisions, Short Plats, or Conversions Eagle Territory: Olele Point Occurrence: 117 Nest#: 2 Proposed Activity: Jefferson Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination CONDITIONS: All known bald eagle nest trees(active or alternate)and winter roost sites are protected. The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: X CONDITION 1: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch trees, all native conifers and all black cottonwood trees >24 inches diameter at breast height (diameter 4.5 feet from ground, known as d.b.h). Also retain>50% of coniferous and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest tree. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. ❑ CONDITION 2: This parcel is located >400 feet and < 800 feet or within 1/2 mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline: Retain all known perch trees, and 75% native conifers and cottonwoods >24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above condition placed on Parcel # 921332030 with a street address of Lot C . If the conditions set forth above are acceptable, please sign below and this will serve as your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. ykv, Zzt� WDFW Regional Wildlife Manager Landowner Signature (Date) cTh City-/County,Official* (Date) 1 1 Address � to S.1 4141-i b—U i .. Po VIp,>A--C, -� 77.3 Send Copy To: WDFW City-, State,Zip Wildlife Resource Data Systems Q -�1 t 600 Capitol Way N , � ` " Olympia,WA 98501-1091 Phone Page 1 of 1 Michelle Farfan From: Terry Duff Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 8:22 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: George Herion ZON09-00009/MLA09-00025 Michelle, We decided yesterday at the DRD meeting that an address would not be necessary to issue the SPAAD. Since Barbara called me regarding this, I will let her know. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks, 7;67 04 Eng.Tech III Jefferson County Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend,Wa 98368 360-385-9159 6/9/2010 Page 1 of 3 Michelle Farfan From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:45 AM To: thestocker @asisna.com Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers; Fagan Susan Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Attachments: Herion Plan (Draft).doc Hi George, I hope you had a pleasant weekend. I have to rush off to assist with deer/elk projects all this week on the north Olympic Peninsula. I hope to get back a few evenings this week and can check messages. I have attached a draft Bald Eagle Management Plan for your parcel (that you plan to sell in the future). Please review and provide me with any comments you may have. We can finalize both plans after you provide more information about the specific home site locations and proposed tree removal. Thanks! Sincerely, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:05 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: 'Michelle Farfan'; 'Barbara Blowers'; 'Fagan Susan' Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Thanks for the update Shelly. i was not able to go to the property this week, but Barbara said she would go out and take a look/see. waiting to hear back from her. I will begin my review of your revised plan and will get back to you as soon as possible. Once I get the info from Barbara, I will also fire it off to you. Thanks. H George C. 2ferion 10716 S. Baltimore IV Spokgne, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN GOD TKL)SST' Original Message From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:59 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers; Fagan Susan Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Hi there George, 5/24/2010 Page 2 of 3 I guess I'm wondering if you might have made it over to the property this week?? If so hope you saw the nest and can let me know if you observed any little eaglets present. I do look forward to getting more information from you on the specific building envelopes for each lot and more details about proposed tree removal. I did get a chance to work on the revisions we discussed for the plan. I have attached a copy of the revised plan. I did my best to address the items we discussed. I have highlighted in yellow all the items where I made modifications or additions. There are also items that I completely deleted as per your request(clearing on Wilde's property and conditions related to selling the property, etc.). I have highlighted in pink the items that will need to completed after you provide more information. Please review the plan and let me know if you have questions or concerns. I truly feel that I did my best to try and address most of your previous concerns. The only item you may not agree with is that I did leave the timing recommendation conditions in the plan. This is truly a recommendation and not a requirement of the plan. As a biologist, I do feel it is important to convey that development activities during the nest season (so very close to the nest tree)could have an adverse impact on the local eagle pair. I will be working on the draft plan for your property as soon as possible. I will be out of the area for deer/elk captures all next week. I do not know if we can swing it but I would strive to work with you to have completed plans for both lots before I head in the field early Monday morning. Please send me a quick confirmation message so I know you received this revised plan and let me know if you will be available during the next few days(including the weekend)to finalize the plans. Thanks! I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:44 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers; Fagan Susan Subject: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review 15 May 2010 Hi Shelly: That was quite a conversation we had yesterday. I believe it went on for nearly 2 hours. I will recap some of the issues discussed. From the discussion we agreed that we will push ahead with the Bald Eagle Plan for the Lucas property followed by the Herion Eagle Plan. You stated that you will be able to do a lot of"cut and paste"on the Lucas plan to the Herion plan. This should save time as the Background/Justification and Factors Considered should be near duplicate with the exception of distances from Active Eagle Tree Nest#2. From the attachment, you will see my notes in RED. Hopefully I scrubbed them well enough for you to understand what my comments were. As for the Nest trees, this is what I understood: Nest Tree# 1 is vacant and borders Lucas/Wlde property of the southern border of the Lucas property Nest Tree#2 is active and on the Wilde Property north of the Herion property; approximately 660 feet in from the water's edge and 50 north of the northern border of Herion's parcel. Nest Tree#3 may be the tree you and Mr. Wilde identified as a large Doug Fir near the Bank 5/24/2010 Page 3 of 3 Edge on the Lucas property. I looked into the WAC 232-12-292 plus a few others within WAC 232-12 and could not find where it stated " 400 feet from the property line". This may be a mute point, then again, I was hoping this would be a one page issue. Also, I want to emphasize any misunderstanding of where the homesite footprint will be. It will be west of Eagle Nest Tree#1. I believe I may have mislead you in thinking that I wanted the residence to be located 3 e i 35 feet back from the 9 high water mark. And as mentioned in conversation n the site will be well over the 400 foot bench mark from Eagle Nest Tree#2 (New Nest). You will see a comment about"roosting". It was buried in one of the paragraphs. We discussed this issue. Boiler plate info always bothers me as discussed. If it is policy then I understand. But if it is an individual expression from previous plans, then I don't think it is helpful. I understand the "purpose of the Site- Specific management plan is to provide for the protection of specific bald eagle habitat " (WAC 232- 12-292), But I fear when recommendations get interpreted as policy then the landowner becomes bound to that action. Again, as we discussed, it would be nice if the WDFW would review and revise their requirements in the Site-Specific Eagle Plan example, dated July 19,2006. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Take care and have a good weekend. George C. 9ferion 107165. Baltimore Spogne, TWA 99223 509.448.7917 Ix GOO WETRV T 5/24/2010 III DRAFT WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN RCW 77.12.655 WAC 232-12-292 Eagle Territory: Olele Point#117 Applicants Property George C. and Leslie M. Herion Parcel # 921-332-030, 10716 S. Baltimore Rd. Township 29 North, Range 1 East, Spokane, WA 99223 Section 33, SW 1/4 of NE 'A, Jefferson County. Pending Activity Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)to secure development within the current set-back zone along the shoreline. The landowners are planning to sell the property. Residential development shall be proposed in the future. Development to include installation of a new driveway, construction of a single-family residence, and installation of septic system. Some vegetation removal along property lines is also proposed. FACTORS CONSIDERED 1) Landowners goals were considered through a review of a proposed site development plan and SPAAD application submitted to Jefferson County. Various phone conversations and e-mail exchanges were conducted with the landowner representative, George Herion,to review the proposed development. A site visit was conducted to the property on April 15, 2010. The WDFW obtained permission to access the property. During the site visit WDFW located the three bald eagle nest trees, reviewed the specific site development proposal, and reviewed trees in general areas proposed for removal. 2) Bald eagle habitat use was considered by analysis of territory integrity through time, current surrounding habitat conditions, potential for blowdown, current status of the bald eagle population and scientific literature concerning bald eagle habitat protection. Bald Eagle Management Plans prepared for other landowners within the territory were also reviewed. BACKGROUND The Olele Point Bald Eagle Territory is located approximately 3 miles north of Port Ludlow in Jefferson County (Figure 1). The bald eagle nest trees are located along the Page 1 of 10 west side of Admiralty Inlet within the Puget Sound. The history of the surrounding vicinity has been one of conversion of a timbered peninsula to an increasingly subdivided area where a considerable portion of the suitable bald eagle habitat has been altered by timber clearing and residential development. The area is vulnerable to high winds and the potential for the blow down of remaining trees is present. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) initiated monitoring the Olele Point Bald Eagle Territory in 1980. It is possible that the territory was established prior to documentation by the WDFW. A total of three nest trees have been documented within the territory (Figure 2). All three nest trees are located within approximately 500 feet of each other along Admiralty Inlet approximately 400 feet north of the entrance to Mats Mats Bay and 1000 feet north of the currently operating quarry located at the south entrance to Mats Mats Bay. The original nest tree is a tall dominant live spindly-topped Douglas fir tree located approximately 250 feet west of the shoreline. A total of at least 7 young had been produced in this Nest#1 since 1980. During the aerial survey conducted by the WDFW in April of 1995 to check the occupancy of eagle territories it was documented that this nest had been destroyed. The nest tree is still present and has suitable structure to support another nest. During the same survey a new Nest#2 nest was documented in a flat-topped Douglas fir tree approximately 400 feet northeast of the original nest tree. This nest tree is located approximately 60 feet west of the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet. An adult eagle was observed in incubation posture on the nest during the survey. A productivity survey was conducted in June of 1995 and 1 young eaglet was documented in the nest. During the aerial survey conducted by the WDFW in April of 1996 and 1997 an adult eagle was documented in incubation posture on Nest#2. A survey to check the productivity results was not conducted in June of these seasons so it is unknown if any young were produced during these years. With the exception of 2001, Nest#2 was continuously occupied by the resident pair of eagles since 1995. At least six young were produced in this nest from 1995 - 2000. Nest Tree #3 was located by WDFW during an aerial survey conducted in April of 2001. This nest tree is located approximately 300 feet south of the tree containing Nest#2 and approximately 200 feet northeast of Nest tree #1 along the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet. Nest#3 was occupied by the resident pair of eagles in 2001 and produced one young. The eagle pair nested in Nest#2 during the 2002 nesting season. It is unknown how many young were produced at the nest that season. The WDFW did not conduct any aerial surveys during the 2003 or 2004 seasons so nesting activity is not known for these seasons. The WDFW did conduct a statewide aerial survey of eagle nesting territories in 2005. The Olele Point Territory was surveyed on April 8, 2005. No nests were found in the trees that had contained Nest#1 and Nest#3 but the trees were reported to still be suitable to support nests. The Nest#2 was located during the survey and was reported as unrepaired. No eagles were observed at the nest. The nesting status of the Olele Point Territory is unknown for the 2006—2009 nesting seasons. The WDFW no longer has funding or staff time to monitor bald eagle nests each season. However, it can be noted that during the site visit to review development plans for this plan on April 15, 2010, that eagle activity was present within the territory. There were considerable eagle vocalizations heard along the shoreline area. Nest#2 was located and one adult eagle was observed on the nest. The behavior observed conveyed that the eagle was likely brooding young in the nest. During the site visit, WDFW confirmed that the tree that the trees that contained Page 2 of 10 Nest#1 and Nest#3 were still present. It was also documented that the adjacent landowners has conducted some recent clearing near the tree containing Nest#2. The nest tree that had contained Nest#1 is on a parcel of property that has been developed. This property contains a single-family home with detached shop and guesthouse under a Bald Eagle Management Plan that was executed in October 1996. Nest Trees #2 and #3 are located on undeveloped parcels of land bordering Admiralty Inlet. These undeveloped parcels contain stands of deciduous trees with a mix of conifer trees. Numerous large mature conifer trees exist along the shoreline of these undeveloped parcels. George and Leslie Herion have owned a 4.7 acre parcel of property within the Olele Point Eagle Territory for many years (Figure 3). The landowners are not planning to develop the property in the future and will be putting the parcel up for sale. The documented Olele Point bald eagle Nest Tree#1 is located two parcels to the north. The tree containing Nest#2 that is active this season is located on the parcel directly to the south and tree that had contained Nest#3 is located along the shoreline on the property adjacent to the north. The Herion property parcel contains significant bald eagle habitat that includes buffering habitat to all nest trees, shoreline perching habitat, and potential alternate nest trees. The landowners were apparently not aware of the need for a Bald Eagle Management Plan. The landowners are planning to sell the parcel of property in the future. They submitted a Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD) application to Jefferson County in early 2010. They initiated the SPAAD process to preserve the shoreline set back from the high water mark. The property is rectangular shaped and contains approximately 240 feet of medium bluff waterfront above the Admiralty Inlet. The property was substantially logged in the mid 70's. An access road was constructed in the late 1990's. The property is actually accessed off an easement road that runs north-south across the property. This is a maintained easement road that actually borders the western edge of the property. The landowners actually own a acre parcel of property directly to the west of the easement road. There is currently no easy access to the beach on the waterfront property. A majority of the parcel is fairly wooded with a mix of conifer trees and a large component of young red alder and large-leaf maple trees. A few cherry trees are located on the property. Ground vegetation includes sword fern, stinging nettles, various berry species, salal, ocean spray, and other shrubs and forbs. There are some mature conifer trees and a large snag tree that have potential for bald eagle perching. There are also alternate nest trees on the property. Some portions of the Herion property are relatively steep with a descending slope to the shoreline. There is a steep drainage located along the northeastern side of the property. There are portions of the property that are not suitable for building. An area on the eastern side of the easement road and west of the shoreline is the area proposed for development on the SPAAD application. Bald eagle Nest Tree #2 and other significant bald eagle habitat are located in this portion of the property. A Geology Hazard Assessment Report was required to determine if there were any landslide hazard areas on the property. The county has a 1:1 ratio set back requirement for the bluff. The Geo-Tech report, dated October 1, 2009, concluded that Page 3 of 10 • nest trees. The protection of bald eagle perching habitat and potential alternate nest trees that exist on the Lucas property is also important. There is also some concern that the proposed development and increased human disturbance could cause nest failure, reduced productivity over time, or abandonment of the territory. The WDFW no longer requires timing restrictions for heavy equipment operations or outside construction within 800 feet of a nest tree. However, timing restrictions will be recommended in this plan to minimize disturbance during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season. The planting of conifer seedling trees on the property has been recommended by WDFW. The conifers will enhance the existing buffer on the nest tree, supplement screening of the proposed residence, and provide future bald eagle habitat. The landowners have exhibited a strong desire to protect the local eagle pair and the remaining significant bald eagle habitat that is located on the property. CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to protect bald eagles and their habitat: 1) The Douglas fir tree located on the property that was documented to contain the Olele Point bald eagle Nest#2 shall not be damaged or removed. 2) The landowner agrees to assume any and all risks resulting from the presence of proposing development near the bald eagle Nest Trees#2 and will not seek authorization to remove these trees. 3) The WDFW shall grant approval of the proposed SPAAD for the parcel but the purchaser of the property shall work closely with the WDFW to define specific locations for the proposed development on the property. 4) The proposal to install a new driveway and septic system on the property, as shown on the SPAAD plan, shall be allowed (Figure 4). 5) The proposal to construct a single-family residence on the property, as shown on the SPAAD plan, shall be allowed (Figure 4). 6) A finalized site development plan shall be provided to WDFW prior to any further tree removal, clearing, or development on the parcel. The WDFW and landowner shall work together to define a specific home foot print location that will protect important bald eagle habitat. 7) The proposal to remove understory vegetation and identified trees within the areas proposed for development shall be allowed. Trees proposed for removal will be shown on the finalized site development plan. All clearing shall be in compliance with Jefferson County regulations and the Drainage and Erosion Control Plan developed for the property. Page 5 of 10 8) The clearing of vegetation along property lines shall be allowed. Every effort should be made to protect existing trees along the property boundaries. The landowner representative shall contact WDFW if any conifer trees> 12 inches diameter at breast height(DBH) are proposed for removal. 9) The selective removal/trimming of understory vegetation,the selective removal of small (< inches diameter at breast height) hardwood trees, and the limbing of conifer trees shall be allowed to achieve and maintain a water view. No more than 30% of the live crown of a conifer tree shall be removed. The landowners shall maintain the existing screen of vegetation towards the nest trees as much as possible. 10) Danger trees may be removed if trees are identified as hazardous by a professional forester or certified arborist. A written report from the forester/arborist must be submitted to the WDFW before approval to remove the hazard trees is granted. A tree that presents imminent danger to the safety or property of individuals may be removed without a report. 11) It is recommended that no heavy equipment operation, clearing, tree cutting, outside home construction, or burning shall occur during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 - August 15 of any given year. Timing restrictions shall not be required for a given year if it may be determined that the eagle pair is not actively nesting at the nest or within 800 feet of the property. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1, then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys to determine nesting status must be conducted by a qualified biologist. * Special note: The WDFW is no longer requiring timing restrictions but has requested that the landowner work cooperatively to minimize disturbance during the nesting season. The landowner shall contact WDFW if any heavy equipment work or outside construction activities are proposed during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season. The landowner and WDFW shall develop a plan to minimize disturbance and potential impacts to the eagles. 12) The WDFW recommends no discharge of firearms, fireworks, or explosives during the bald eagle breeding and nesting season from February 1 - August 15 of any given year. 13) The landowner trustees shall notify all potential buyers that a bald eagle management plan is required for the property. 14) The future purchaser of the property shall be required to sign a finalized Bald Eagle Management Plan based on the conditions of this plan. Page 6 of 10 JUSTIFICATION The landowner was granted approval to develop within 400 feet of identified bald eagle nest trees due to the fact that Nest Tree#2 is located on the adjacent property, the tree that contained Nest#3 is on the adjacent property. The WDFW recognizes that the landowner be granted reasonable use of the property. The WDFW worked closely with the landowner to minimize impacts of proposed development. A diligent effort was made to use existing cleared areas and to minimize tree removal on the property. The WDFW has recommended the planting of conifer trees to improve buffering around the nest trees and provide future bald eagle habitat. DURATION OF PROTECTION This plan applies to the landowner who signs the plan. If the ownership changes, the new landowner may sign the approved bald eagle plan or request a new one. Since eagles return to the same traditional use areas each year, the conditions of this plan shall apply indefinitely unless a breeding territory has been unoccupied for 5 consecutive years. If the breeding territory is unoccupied for 5 consecutive years, then the WDFW biologist and the landowner should evaluate the continued need for protection of the bald eagle habitat. If an eagle does not show signs of incubating eggs by May 1, then the recommended timing restrictions do not apply for that year. Surveys shall be done by a qualified wildlife biologist. Please contact WDFW if the eagles change the location of their nest. Do not assume that the conditions of this plan no longer apply. REVIEW AND AMENDMENT This plan will be subject to the following review and amendment process. The plan may be reviewed periodically by the WDFW to determine whether: 1)the plan requires amendment in response to changing eagle and landowner circumstances; or, 2)the terms of the plan comply with applicable laws and regulations; or, 3)the parties to the plan are complying with its terms. APPEAL PROCEDURE In addition to the provisions of WAC 232-12-292 (7.1)-(7.3), the landowner may request a formal appeal of WDFW actions according the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW, and the Model Rules of Procedure, Chapter 10.08 WCA. Such a request shall be filed with the Department within 20 days of receipt of the contested WDFW decision. The appeal request shall clearly state the relief sought and the ground for appeal. Page 7 of 10 COMPLIANCE Failure to comply with this plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. However, compliance with this plan does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal, state, or local laws. This plan applies only to the proposed land use listed above. Any other proposals may be subject to a different set of conditions. It is the landowner's responsibility to notify WDFW of any new proposed land use activities. Plan drafted by Shelly Ament of the WDFW, P.O. Box 1933, Sequim, WA 98382 (360)681-4276. Page 8of10 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Bald Eagle Site Management Agreement On behalf of the people of the State of Washington,to which its wildlife belongs, the following agreement is hereby enacted for the purpose of protecting bald eagles and their habitats. The Landowner and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife agree to the conservation measures described in the attached site management plan. Site name: Olele Point#117 Legal description of proposed project: T29N, R1E, Section 33 The undersigned hereby agree to the terms of the Bald Eagle Management Plan Landowner(Signature) Date Landowner(print) Phone number Address City, State, Zip The State of Washington,Department of Fish and Wildlife Regional Program Manager Date Wildlife Biologist Date Region County Priority Inspected by Date Page 9 of 10 FIGURE 1. The location of the Olele Point Bald Eagle Nesting Territory Jefferson County FIGURE 2. The location of the Olele Point bald eagle nest trees. FIGURE 3. The location of the Herion property and the location of the documented bald eagle nest trees. FIGURE 4. The proposed SPAAD site development plan for the Herion property. NEST NEST NEST TREE#1 TREE #2 TREE #3 HERION PROPERTY Page 10 of 10 Page 1 of 3 Michelle Farfan From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 10:47 AM To: Barbara Blowers Cc: thestocker @asisna.com; Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Barbara, I had originally written the plan to allow approval of the SPAAD(with specific site plan finalization in the future—based on coordinated effort w/landowner and WDFW). We could still go that route but George has conveyed to me that he wanted to finalize the specific home locations on each lot. Please understand.....these parcels have 3 nest trees in very close proximity. The WDFW is not willing to sign off on a home anywhere in the huge "buildable area" shown on the SPAAD site plans. I do have concerns about the home locations being at the 35 foot setback. The nest trees and significant other bald eagle habitat area located within the shoreline area. George has discussed with me that he proposes the home site locations higher up the slope from the shoreline (not in the area shown on the SPAAD application site plan). Shelly From: Barbara Blowers [mailto:waves @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:27 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Are you sure all this site development crap is necessaruy? This is for a SPAAD -- it is NOT for a house -- until new buyer has the property, there is no definite'site plan'. bb From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent:Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:52 PM To: Barbara Blowers Cc: thestocker @asisna.com Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review So....can I assume that George did not make it over this week?? The finalized plans will have 4 figures included. Figure 4 will be the site development plan.As I told George........I will need site development plans for each lot that will show all proposed development including the specific building sites. The site plans will need to be 8%x 11 or 11 x 17.Thanks. From: Barbara Blowers [mailto:waves @olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:38 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: thestocker @asisna.com Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review I plan to go out there this weekend to identify the building sites and the trees to be removed. As you know, I like the plans to have a map attached for clarity. bb 5/24/2010 Page 2 of 3 From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:59 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers; Fagan Susan Subject: RE: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review Hi there George, I guess I'm wondering if you might have made it over to the property this week?? If so hope you saw the nest and can let me know if you observed any little eaglets present. I do look forward to getting more information from you on the specific building envelopes for each lot and more details about proposed tree removal. I did get a chance to work on the revisions we discussed for the plan. I have attached a copy of the revised plan. I did my best to address the items we discussed. I have highlighted in yellow all the items where I made modifications or additions. There are also items that I completely deleted as per your request(clearing on Wilde's property and conditions related to selling the property, etc.). I have highlighted in pink the items that will need to completed after you provide more information. Please review the plan and let me know if you have questions or concerns. I truly feel that I did my best to try and address most of your previous concerns. The only item you may not agree with is that I did leave the timing recommendation conditions in the plan. This is truly a recommendation and not a requirement of the plan. As a biologist, I do feel it is important to convey that development activities during the nest season (so very close to the nest tree) could have an adverse impact on the local eagle pair. I will be working on the draft plan for your property as soon as possible. I will be out of the area for deer/elk captures all next week. I do not know if we can swing it but I would strive to work with you to have completed plans for both lots before I head in the field early Monday morning. Please send me a quick confirmation message so I know you received this revised plan and let me know if you will be available during the next few days(including the weekend)to finalize the plans. Thanks! I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @ asisna.com] Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:44 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers; Fagan Susan Subject: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review 15 May 2010 Hi Shelly: That was quite a conversation we had yesterday. I believe it went on for nearly 2 hours. I will recap some of the issues discussed. From the discussion we agreed that we will push ahead with the Bald Eagle Plan for the Lucas property followed by the Herion Eagle Plan. You stated that you will be able to do a lot of"cut and paste" on the Lucas plan to the Herion plan. This should save time as the Background/Justification and Factors Considered should be near duplicate with the exception of distances from Active Eagle Tree Nest#2. 5/24/2010 Page 3 of 3 From the attachment, you will see my notes in RED. Hopefully I scrubbed them well enough for you to understand what my comments were. As for the Nest trees, this is what I understood: Nest Tree# 1 is vacant and borders Lucas/Wilde property of the southern border of the Lucas property Nest Tree#2 is active and on the Wilde Property north of the Herion property; approximately 660 feet in from the water's edge and 50 north of the northern border of Herion's parcel. Nest Tree#3 may be the tree you and Mr. Wilde identified as a large Doug Fir near the Bank Edge on the Lucas property. • I looked into the WAC 232-12-292 plus a few others within WAC 232-12 and could not find where it stated " 400 feet from the property line". This may be a mute point, then again, I was hoping this would be a one page issue. Also, I want to emphasize any misunderstanding of where the homesite footprint will be. It will be west of Eagle Nest Tree#1. I believe I may have mislead you in thinking that I wanted the residence to be located 35 feet back from the high water mark. And as mentioned in conversation the site will be well over the 400 foot bench mark from Eagle Nest Tree#2 (New Nest). You will see a comment about"roosting". It was buried in one of the paragraphs. We discussed this issue. Boiler plate info always bothers me as discussed. If it is policy then I understand. But if it is an individual expression from previous plans, then I don't think it is helpful. I understand the"purpose of the Site-Specific management plan is to provide for the protection of specific bald eagle habitat " (WAC 232-12-292), But I ins get interpreted as policy then the landowner becomes bound to that action. Again, when r commendat o fear whe e p p Y 9 as we discussed, it would be nice if the WDFW would review and revise their requirements in the Site-Specific Eagle Plan example, dated July 19,2006. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Take care and have a good weekend. George C. Merlon 10716 S. Baltimore q(rl Spokane, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN GOD WE TRUST 5/24/2010 Page 1 of 2 • Michelle Farfan From: Susan Fagan [susan @susanfagan.com] Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:09 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com; Ament Shelly Cc: Michelle Farfan; Barbara Blowers Subject: Re: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review George: Thank you for copying me on this important e-mail. After spending almost two decades working on natural resource issues, I am appreciating my new role as a legislator and policymaker even more. When time allows, will you give me an overall briefing on this issue?I need to put it in context with some other details I've received. Again, many thanks. Best regards, Susan Representative Susan Fagan 9th Legislative District WA House of Representatives 0: 360-786-7942 C: 509-979-3083 Sent via B1ackBerry by AT&T • From: "George Herion" <thestocker @asisna.com> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 13:44:09 -0700 To: Ament Shelly<Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov> Cc: Michelle Farfan<mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Barbara Blowers<waves @olympus.net>; Fagan Susan<susan @susanfagan.com> Subject: Eagle Plan for Lucas/Herion Property-On Line Review 15 May 2010 Hi Shelly: That was quite a conversation we had yesterday. I believe it went on for nearly 2 hours. I will recap some of the issues discussed. From the discussion we agreed that we will push ahead with the Bald Eagle Plan for the Lucas property followed by the Herion Eagle Plan. You stated that you will be able to do a lot of"cut and paste"on the Lucas plan to the Herion plan. This should save time as the Background/Justification and Factors Considered should be near duplicate with the exception of distances from Active Eagle Tree Nest#2. From the attachment, you will see my notes in RED. Hopefully I scrubbed them well enough for you to understand what my comments were. As for the Nest trees, this is what I understood: Nest Tree# 1 is vacant and borders Lucas/Wilde property of the southern border of the Lucas property Nest Tree#2 is active and on the Wilde Property north of the Herion property; approximately 660 feet in from the water's edge and 50 north of the northern border of Herion's parcel. Nest Tree#3 may be the tree you and Mr. Wilde identified as a large Doug Fir near the Bank 5/16/2010 Page 2 of 2 Edge on the Lucas property. I looked into the WAC 232-12-292 plus a few others within WAC 232-12 and could not find where it stated "400 feet from the property line". This may be a mute point, then again, I was hoping this would be a one page issue. Also, I want to emphasize any misunderstanding of where the homesite footprint will be. It will be west of Eagle Nest Tree#1. I believe I may have mislead you in thinking that I wanted the residence to be located 35 feet back from the high water mark. And as mentioned in conversation the site will be well over the 400 foot bench mark from Eagle Nest Tree#2 (New Nest). You will see a comment about"roosting". It was buried in one of the paragraphs. We discussed this issue. Boiler plate info always bothers me as discussed. If it is policy then I understand. But if it is an individual expression from previous plans, then I don't think it is helpful. I understand the"purpose of the Site-Specific management plan is to provide for the protection of specific bald eagle habitat... " (WAC 232-12-292), But I fear when recommendations get interpreted as policy then the landowner becomes bound to that action. Again, as we discussed, it would be nice if the WDFW would review and revise their requirements in the Site-Specific Eagle Plan example, dated July 19,2006. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Take care and have a good weekend. George C .fferion 10716 S. Baltimore TV Spokane, WA 99223 509.448.7917 lAr GOD WE TRUST 5/16/2010 Page 1 of 6 Michelle Farfan From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:16 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Cc: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Hi George, Sure sorry we keep missing each other. It has been a busy week and I have not been able to be in my office as much as I had hoped. I gave you a quick phone call shortly after 4:00 hoping I could still catch- up with you but you were already out for the evening. I did leave a message that you will maybe get before this e-mail message. I understand Barbara is reviewing the draft plan. I did request that she send me a copy of the Geo-Tech report. It would be nice for me to know what the specific required set-backs for each lot will be. It sounds like you and Barbara are questioning if there is indeed an active nest in the vicinity. If you send her out to locate the nest she doesn't have to go on the Wilde property. I first located the nest while standing in the proposed building envelope area on your lot. I heard 2 eagles vocalizing first from the Lucas lot. When I moved north to your lot I spotted the nest. I then climbed to a higher elevation on your lot to determine if the nest was active. I observed one adult eagle at the nest. I sure wish I had my camera with me! The tree the nest was located in did meet the description of Nest Tree#2. If you do have Barbara go out to the site I sure hope she will not share too much information with Mr. Wilde when she calls to have him open the gate. I believe he may have conducted some illegal clearing of his property but I have not had time to initiate a full investigation with the DNR,the county, and my agency Law Enforcement staff. As you know there is some history between Dale and my agency(+the ,county and DNR for that matter). I know he told you the eagle nests were no longer present. It is certainly possible that he doesn't know about the nest but I think it would be difficult for him not to see the nest or at least view the activity at this nest from his cleared property to the north. Due to the sensitive nature of the situation I have not contacted him to discuss the active nest. Barbara also wrote me a rude message in which she questions the delay in the plan for your lot. I know your SPAAD deadline is May 24th for this lot and I planned to draft that plan soon. Please know George April—June is the busiest time of year for me and I have very limited time to work on eagle management. I'm trying me best to assist you so you meet or are at least close to your deadlines (at no cost). It sounds like Michelle is totally fine with giving you an extension on the SPAAD approval. I certainly would want you to be acceptable of the information and conditions presented in the plan before you sign it. I'm happy to discuss any concerns you may have. Hopefully we can actually talk soon. You had suggested tomorrow but I will be at aircraft training all day in Port Angeles. Friday would be an option but I will be out some of the day for a butterfly survey. Maybe let me know when you will be around on Friday. I hope we can catch-up sometime soon. Take care, 5/13/2010 Page 2 of 6 Shelly P.S. My brother lives in CO but I think he got the turkey in Iowa or maybe Kansas. He is big-time into pheasant hunting in those states. From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:45 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: Farfan Michelle; "Farfan Michelle\(Business Fax\)" Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Shelly: No call. Guess you must have had another task to perform. I received the OK from Michelle on the extension, so I am a bit more comfortable. The rest of this afternoon and this evening, I am out of the net(gone). If we can connect tomorrow morning any where between 0800 and 1100 hours, I am good to go. If tomorrow is bad for you, I should be available late Friday morning and early afternoon. No I am not going turkey hunting. I have a 0700 hour meeting that goes on for some time. Send me and e mail back to let me know the situation. I will check my e mail when I get home tonight. Take care. H George C.Merlon 10716 S. Baltimore k' Spojgne, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN GOD WE TRUST Original Message From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:01 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Cc: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL &MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Importance: High Hi George, I just left you a lengthy phone message at your home number. I was concerned that you may not have received my e-mail messages from yesterday and today. I had sent you a copy of a draft plan late last evening. I also included a copy of the plan signed by Jeff Lucas. I thought I would hear back from you and maybe we could have worked together on the plan today. I did try and contact Michelle at the county and found out that she was actually out of the office today but will be back tomorrow. I have been up since 2:30 am for my survey and have had a long day. I have another murrelet survey near Forks tomorrow early am and should be back to my office after 10:30 am. The highest priority for the day tomorrow will be to work with you to finalize the plan. Please confirm if you received the plan and let me know if you will be around late tomorrow morning or afternoon. 5/13/2010 Page 3 of 6 Thanks much, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:15 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: "Farfan Michelle \(Business Fax\)"; Farfan Michelle Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL &MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Thanks for the note Shelly. Appreciate the follow up. Please do give me a call this afternoon or early evening. Looking forward to the conversation. You are right on target about me birding in the morning. I watch my blue birds and hunt for turkeys. My blue birds are nesting now along with the turkey hens, so the turkeys have disappeared from sight-you can only hunt Toms this time of the year-and the gobblers don't answer to the call, so hunting is not so good. As for the blue birds, we are watching them closely. As far as the electronic Eagle Plan goes, I know nothing about it. Jeff has never mentioned it to me, and I have never seen a copy. It would be interesting to read, so if you find a copy, please send it. Hope to talk with you tonight or tomorrow. Take care. H George C. J[erion 107165 Baltimore ) Spoksne, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN GOD WE TRUST Original Message From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 1:15 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Importance: High Hi George, I appreciate you letting me know you will be around today and tomorrow. I can only guess that you might be out birding or fishing for the mornings. I was working on your plan today but now have to run off to collected a dead eaglet that died when a nest blew out of tree in a recent wind storm. Bummer!! I need to get to it before neighborhood dogs or coyotes find it. I also have a quick required hearing test I have to take today(to be certified for marbled murrelet surveys starting tomorrow). I will be back to work on the Lucas draft plan. You will certainly have a draft plan from me later today(it may actually be early evening). I will be available to work with you this evening, and late morning/afternoon tomorrow to finalize the plan. By the way.......I saw an electronic Bald Eagle Management Plan for"Jeff Lucas"for a road access to the Lucas property in 1992. I did not work on eagles then so I'm looking into this plan with my regional office. Do you know if it was signed?? 5/13/2010 Page 4 of 6 Later, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:21 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Cc: Farfan Michelle Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Shelly: I will be in the area Monday and Tuesday. Times not at home on these days will be from 0500 to 1130-weather depending. I can make changes with advance notice. So if you can lock in a frame of time, I will be here. Take care. H George C. 9ferion 10716 S. Baltimore Spokane, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN(JO!) WE TRUST Original Message From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:34 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: thestocker @asisna.com; Skriletz, Jeffrey K(DFW) Subject: RE: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Hi Michelle, I did not pass these site specific plans over to Jeff. The landowner had contacted me before Jeff came on board. Mr. Herion was working with Barbara Blowers but then elected to have me step in since he did not want to have to pay her to complete the plans. I did conduct a site visit on April 15 to locate the nest trees and review the proposed site development plans. There are 3 documented bald eagle nest trees on and/or near the parcels. Nest#2 was found to be active this season and is either on the Herion property or just over the property line on Dale Wilde's parcel to the north. I'm certainly aware that Mr. Herion has a deadline for the SPAAD on the Lucas Lot of May 12 and on his lot of May 24. I was planning to have both plans completed by this week but was then recruited to assist with deer fawn captures and have been out of the office. I'm still planning to have the plan for the Lucas lot completed as soon as possible (to meet the deadline next week). I have initiated drafting the plan. I have to be in the field g p for survey work today and tomorrow. Hopefully Mr. Herion and I can work together to have a finalized plan on Monday or Tuesday. The plan for the Herion lot will be the next priority and should be finalized before the 24th 5/13/2010 Page 5 of 6 Both parcels of property contain very significant nest buffering habitat and perch trees that I observed during my site visit. As you know.......the SPAAD application site plans I have do not convey the specific location of proposed development. There is no exact footprint shown for the home location,just a general buildable area. There is also no specific location for a driveway for each parcel. For the purposes of completing Bald Eagle Management Plans it would be preferred to have more finalized site plans. At this time, I'm drafting plans that will contain some wording that WDFW will work closely with the landowner in the future to identify the specific home site location. Our agency must allow reasonable use of the property so it is a given that a driveway,septic system, and single family residence will be allowed on each lot. A condition of the plan will be that the landowner provide WDFW with a finalized site development plan (showing the footprint of a home) prior to any tree cutting, clearing, or development. On a side note: During my site visit to the Herion property, I did note that Dale Wilde has conducted more clearing and other land-use activities on his Parcel#921332002. I would like to investigate this situation further. Would you be my county contact for this?? Please let me know if you have further questions. Happy Spring, Shelly From: Michelle Farfan [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:17 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Subject: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL& MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Importance: High Hi Shelly: Just checking to see what the status of these two SPAADS are or these have been transferred to Jeff. I know the property owner sent an email to you on April 13, 2010 regarding the eagle plan. The county notified the property owners on February 11, 2010 that an Eagle plan was required by WDFW. Can you update me as to the status since this is the only item left that is needed to issue these applications? You can either call me or email me. Thank you so much. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan 'port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 5/13/2010 Page 6 of 6 • 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.5612CW Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:3o pm Monday to ThursdaY and closed on Fridays. 5/13/2010 Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:19 PM To: 'thestocker@asisna.com' Subject: FW: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Importance: High Hi George: Here is the email I sent to Shelly. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 Rf W Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:17 PM To: 'Ament, Shelly M (DFW)' Subject: MLA10-00025, George Herion, Bayview Drive, PL & MLA10-00004, Herion/Lucas; Bayview Drive, PL Importance: High Hi Shelly: Just checking to see what the status of these two SPAADS are or these have been transferred to Jeff. I know the property owner sent an email to you on April 13, 2010 regarding the eagle plan. The county notified the property owners on February 11, 2010 that an Eagle plan was required by WDFW. Can you update me as to the status since this is the only item left that is needed to issue these applications? You can either call me or email me. Thank you so much. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead 5/5/2010 Page 2 of 2 Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan 'port Townsend W4 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - '#:30 pm Monday to ThursdaY and closed on Flr'idays. 5/5/2010 Page 1 of 1 Colleen Zmolek From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW)[Shelly.Ament©dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:54 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: Eagle Reviews Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Hi Colleen, I have been able to review the recent applications you have sent my way. The results are as follows: MLA10-00011 - Duckabush Terrtory. A one page plan is required. Please notify the landowners to contact me for a plan. MLA10-00025-Olelle Point Territory. *Nest tree adjacent or on the property. A site specific plan is required. Please notify the landowner(or their agent Barbara Blowers)to contact me for a plan. I did have a phone message from the landowner late on 2/19. I will try and get back to him before I leave on vacation. MLA10-00018-Hazel Point North Territory. Site specific plan was completed in 2007. Proceed with issuing permits but advise the landowners that they must comply with the conditions of the plan or contact me. MLA10-00027-Hazel Point North Territory. Site specific plan was completed in 2007. Proceed with issuing permits but advise the landowners that they must comply with the conditions of the plan or contact me. MLA10-00010 -Black Point Territory. A one page plan is required. Please notify the landowners to contact me for a plan. MLA10-00033-Fisherman Cove Territory.A one page plan is required. Please notify the landowners to contact me for a plan. MLA10-00034-Fisherman Cove Territory.A one page plan is required. Please notify the landowners to contact me for a plan. I will be leaving for vacation in a few hours. I will return to work on March 8th. If any urgent issues arise while I'm gone you can contact my supervisor Anita McMillan at 457-4601 or the Regional Program Manager Greg Schirato at(360)249-1222. I will resume communications with you regarding the maps and streamlining plans after I return. Take care, Shelly 2/22/2010 ox ea JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M ., 621 Sheridan Street q O� Port Townsend, WA 98368 ` INS Al Scalf, Director February 23, 2010 GEORGE HERION 10716 S BALTIMORE RD SPOKANE WA 992239544 RE: SITE ADDRESS: BAYVIEW DR CASE#: MLA10-00025 Dear GEORGE HERION: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project Ij Your proposal was sent to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for potential impacts to eagles and their habitat. It has been determined by WDFW that a (one page or site I'I specific) eagle plan will be required prior to issuance of your permit. Please contact Shelly Ament, WDFW biologist at 360-681-4276 or P.O. Box 1933, Sequim WA. 98382, email: amentkma©dfw.wa.gov regarding the plan. Once the plan has been signed by the land owner(s) and WDFW, a copy of the signed plan will need to be submitted to this Department for our records - prior to issuance of your permit. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by May 24, 2010. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, Department of•• unity Development Staff c: File BARBARA BLOWERS Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 February 4, 2010 Dear Reyiwer,SIVLOAD RE: MLA10-00025 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: SPAAD Location: Parcel number 921 332 030, Section 33, Township 29N, Range 1E, WM, located off Bayview Dr, Port Ludlow 98365 Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by February 18, 2010. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary,the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of lime or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, U491ary160.1f- c: , s ;x � ' r ' ' a '§� rk Ek '• . :` • 11-4,,,,,,-,,'h a.;. I:� . �.''L� y* lfi £ ., , ist. ppf„..,i.„+ `trap+ J x- j a ° y� '�V s 1' ,E , i ,,, ;4i . , S�hs - fi„ `+ l ♦ c '''.,,,,k4-.---,14,1%.,,, 1 tY`c A"'":„,, " '�Y S ,, 4 y 4,,:i e. 1" 4*,n �'� ` 2 " y l , t *i'WI . % 4 �.Z M f `}4 a'i S f sti a Y � 4 . i r : ,IT^ {„ lY' T~ '4. :r.7.-, $ ` 4 n4 x y , ` -+. <a'`* > „ 44 n: * ti n y'k f x.� ' r' 3 y • l, t` n. ' ' w 4, a f 4 4. w Y. .al e . ti 41114414]E� ° • {' ' `,a . : , 4 Y :y a " y: f x t l''fi '7,14711, If. , t$> ' • s . `P4c +/« 6):114,14 i 4 wv- i3. k''''';''4. '� N to a . � v 4 4 q {rb� i ^ �1 �4w� n z' z ��'r . ate, r s r f ks �-`'' ? i �,, � k,, ,. h.- � + 1' ry °` ! 4 g7 , $y N 4 + '' _ .4 l tip ti x � Y,-- r T'...,;,* v S„1..1„,,,,,-.1._,:y.,..,i kQ d 0 "x '' I” ' +, �'4. Mp a,s „,4,'',-4:.'y 4". 7.. '' @ a } i4 ;,.'� 7, , 4 `k `<�1 � 1 5 } 4+ti 1 L t � vrl • ``` r vtr lik /44 v . # 4' ` ,41111, - ' 4a. "5, 9`i a �`,t R� F ��° k Y{ � i Ly 'it 4/`,,F 3s r � y s i• ayYiiik~� I+A ik� ¢ ,T ,,,,,,,k`...1, Z ,14yn fT(,N �s� $ _.pa , � r a � �Za av1� h4a• f4 i 3t. ,'.�_I + � i� s , Y R ��L. a �7 � � as k w 41i �W t v '� �. � Y y,„ , a� � (l i,,,::-p= M1 a .4.„, 4h1 x, e'...;/F 3 ” .. N..* ,��3y q" x 1'"4/..* ,. `:, ki _ . , 4 E i ,��µ .' , j ;;,,,, 1 4, , ,,...4-,i ,, ..,.:4.,,,,1,4,� gi.,r 3 + � ' w+ .r °� 4, °,+f, � ?i,y�*" a tilt ,, j fd �e Y ,t! i � w.46';?‘ 'Ate YYa 1/ 5 i , Ya� , �a �, � � s.„_„,,..„„ .., .-,,,,, _�;$r , �• L ; 8 �6 '« *� � ' max .+4 ` n.'r Sr &,a 1 i 41'4 C � n a 4 { .' r�w'� r r` I'} ' '� , � 'f ( ` xk �'r +'( ►wy, `a tip` 'It A' ��” �.10,41#4 y J{ 4, 4 1 "ge-''' * . t Page 1 of 2 Michelle Farfan From: George Herion [thestocker @asisna.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:01 PM To: 'Ament, Shelly M (DFW)' Subject: RE: Silverdale Visit Shelly: Sorry to have missed you. We were over on the property last week and also in Port Townsend where I met Michelle Farfan. She mentioned that she knew you. I told her of my concern about the suspense dates and she felt that you would be able to meet the dates without difficulty. That assurance from her gave me some relief as the amount of money and time into the project has been more then costly in toll. So from your e mail, I am looking forward to receiving the draft plans and hearing from you soon. Take care. H George C. ?ferion 10716 S. Baltimore IV Spokane, WA 99223 509.448.7917 IN GOO WE ( ,`U ST Original Message From: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) [mailto:Shelly.Ament @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:10 PM To: thestocker @asisna.com Subject: RE: Silverdale Visit Hi George, Thanks for the message. I wasn't sure if you meant"this"week or"next" week that you will be in the area??? I did get the packet of information that you sent to me. I do appreciate all the helpful information. I was planning to visit the property on 4/15 or the following week. I have not contacted Dale yet. I will likely have some questions for you after I review all that you sent and after I visit the site. I'm aware of your deadlines and would strive to have draft plans to you by the end of the month. Happy Spring, Shelly From: George Herion [mailto:thestocker @ asisna.com] Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: Ament, Shelly M (DFW) Subject: Silverdale Visit Shelly: Just want to let you know that I will be in the Silverdale area next week. I am booked Mon, Tue, Thurs, and Friday I return to Spokane. I will be available to discuss anything on Wednesday. My cell number is: 509-315-7761. Send me back an e mail or give me a call and let me know if you 4/13/2010 Page 2 of 2 want to meet with me. H George C.5ferion 10716 S. Baltimore IV Spokane, TWA 99223 509.448.7917 I9V GOD WE(MOST 4/13/2010 T '42 l a — 4,....T.1 HI) Csut/ j JEFFERSON COUNTY CO/U Dt'`76 . _----- ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY 78, 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 el.-+F As• ip 4 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax I-Zp-(t) ewww.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment 17 I( 7I Master Permit Application MLA: i C) -ZS- ' Project Desc'ption de separate sheets as necessary): 1-4- Tax Parcel Number. /a / 3 307 0 3 6 Property Size: 4', 0 6 (ac " quare feet) Site Address and/ Directions to Prope b", Property Owner(s)of Record: 6—e0 - r a e -8.4 Telephone: F- : email: Mailing Address: 0 - • !11it NrmETt,..._ wit R'4 3 Applicant/Agent(if d'r3 re from owner): ��'�, i� G. /, ' Telephone: ; a ax: .W �` 4 ail: 6 S.AI— Mailing Address: ►/MT% . • L Login.— /, /4../_A, 1 1 ', (m What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) - El Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CI** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration""" Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: / ` `♦ OCT—, N to act OF AGENT I hereby designate /. W `105 to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE sec be- y— Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachmi ents s tru rtd correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any '•ui -• later ins•-«;ons. Staff's a-- nd ri• t of entry will be assumed unless the applicant infomh the Co ty in writing at the time of the app'r ft*- that e or/ =wants prior not'«: Signature: Alt.. ,AAl►_'. / Algid ' - Date: 61 Zv / 0 The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upo one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Ac"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will n•i iolate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if ,, are in • liance with the Je = ,. (County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans; • _ pons`• i for adhering t /*R1-,. •plying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer= d signs= d dates it below. Signature: / i_ ArL, /. / . . /. .:.I Date: - • / t Or G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc Ar-tt te4 yir-trqs Helping with Permitting in 23 Washington Counties 124 Harrison Street Port Townsend WA 98368 360-38S-6860 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter gives our permission to Barbara Blowers to act as my agent in the process to obtain a Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination for my property whose number is 921332030 •40ir rge Herion Leslie Herion LAN 2 0 2010 r Map Output Page 1 of 1 . ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• LL 4 gip+ �yR� z+'��,� " _ i∎m. '* € '.`ems ", '�' I Botindaria gend a laded Featum8 kr'' a�, d i v; ,�e i+ R " f7d� ;max � 2008 1 P 4CS i' j 1 d i% 4e k ky yb p � p1 �y tt ��� r�' n ry"'TIA'a. 4H 14 #ga q" =� � i�� ��P amp h £�r*y;r aka 1 � a�.l { �1 � � � ^. P �A�` �", ,�af� 3 M ptaddad by�f o Csv # £�5 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Jan 27 08:31:21 2010 I http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C1ientVersion=4.... 1/27/2010 J ■ ■ .t. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �� I. 'art - % c�,4g{ % Fy% . '' 621 SHERIDAN ST..PORT TOWNSEND.WA 98368,(3601 379-4450 ' SOIL EVALUATION Suzanne L Martin\tt PROPERTY OWNER George Herion exp.2/11/10 SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin LEGAL DESCRJPTION: Section 33 Township 29N Range 1E Parcel # 921332030 Subdivision Name Division Block Lot(s) tax 31 Date Logged: 30 December 2009 Logged By: S. Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the depths t which s nificant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers occur. '') Primary Area �! \. 156 , f C U Primary Area; �,, % SOIL LOG #2 Type 4;0.60gpd/s5 , litlik-SOIL LOG #1 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf l (4,t I) rte v 0 to 7 In. dark brow organic loam 0 to 36" in.Strong yellow brown gravelly sandy loam■ 7 2$ Dark ddish brow gravelly sandy loam 24 36" fractured rock with sandy loam to in. (' to in. 28 t0 48 in.Dark yellow brown gravelly loamy medium send t0 36" in.Rock r i'r to 48 in.rock ,., ;,..;. to in. i Anticipated water table n/a in ,, ,.. ... Anticipated water table n/a in. �� Roots to 48e inches 7:\- Roots to 36" inches t it_ Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments `i i Reserve Area; -• Reserve Area; 0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG #3 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf `y r,-, i ,, ' SOIL LOG #4 0 to 25 in. Dark yellow brown fractured gravel sandy loam 0 to 18 in. Dark yellow brown sandy loam to 25 in. rock le, 4,2-1) � to in.with fractured gravel 1 1 t i i IC to in. r to in. `L °" to in. t . , )s° ° to in. ,-„N Anticipated water table nia in. Anticipated water table n/a in. ' Roots to 25" inches Roots to 18 inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments SOIL LOG #b SOIL LOG #6 . to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. Anticipated water table in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to inches Roots to inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:UNFOHLTH SOIL.FRM1/00 r JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AC:444::'";414::.0,414 621 SHERIDAN ST.. PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368,(360) 379-4450 r'/ 5 0 2 .,i`+r1 SOIL EVALUATION . Suzanne L Martin +) 'L'ii tagensrmuNn".. #t PROPERTY OWNER George Herion exp.2/11/10 SYSTEM DESIGNER Suzanne Martin LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 33 Township 29N Range 1E- Parcel # 921332030 Subdivision Name Division Block Lot(s) tax 31 Date Logged: 30 December 2009 Logged By: S. Martin Include soil textural characteristics and the depths at which significant changes occur. Be sure to include depth where mottling or impermeable layers occur. Primary Area; Primary Area; SOIL LOG #1 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG #2 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf 0 to 7 in. dark brown organic loam 0 to 36" in.Strong yellow brown gravelly sandy loam 7 to 28 in.Dark reddish brown gravelly sandy loam 24 to 36" in.fractured rock with sandy loam 28 to 48 in.Dark yellow brown gravelly-loamy medium sand to 36" in. Rock to 48 in,rock to in. Anticipated water table n/a in. Anticipated water table n/a in. Roots to 48" inches Roots to 36" inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments Reserve Area; Reserve Area; SOIL LOG #3 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf SOIL LOG #4 Type 4;0.60gpd/sf 0 to 25 in. Dark yellow brown fractured gravel sandy loam 0 to 18 in. Dark yellow brown sandy loam to 25 in, rock to in.with fractured gravel to in. to in. to in. to in. Anticipated water table n/a in. Anticipated water table n/a in. Roots to 25" inches Roots to 18 inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments SOIL LOG #5 SOIL LOG #6 to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. to in. Anticipated water table in. Anticipated water table in. Roots to inches Roots to inches Health Dept. Comments Health Dept. Comments H:UNFOHLTHISOIL.FRM1/00 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St, Port Townsend WA 98368,(360)379-4450 APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF ADEQUATE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY Resolution �l•,•0 requires buildin• •e it applicants to provide evidence of an adequate potable water supply. Name !.� 04 •��f Phone Mailing Address Zip Code Parcel 2 ,t 36 ID# / 7 f . ✓ U Subdiv. Block Lot(s) Site Address _ ; . ' Zip Code Type of Structure Check all that apply Note:Special conditions may apply within Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones.(SIPZ) Alternative system(provide justification and design per Jefferson County Environmental Health policy 97-01) Valid Water Right Permit(attach copy) Approved Public Water(Submit the attached Water Availability Notification form completed by your water purveyor A , stating the system is capable of and will supply water.) Individual Well–attach copy of: 1) Well logs (If no well log report is on file, a 1 hr stabilization test may be substituted) 2) Lab analysis for water quality parameters tested within 3 years of application: -Total coliform -Nitrate-N -Chloride Plot plan showing location of well with distances from proposed sewage system, buildings, driveways and surrounding properties. Two-party Well—items above AND recorded Operation&Maintenance agreement and recorded Easement. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments, court costs, reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Access and right of ntry to the applicant's property or structure shall be requested and shall occur during regular business hours. /) Signature i Date / 6 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1) Water Right Permit# 2) Public Water Supply WS ID# In Compliance Yes No 3) Individual Well Driller Name Date Drilled Depth Production Meets Water Quality Standards Yes No SIPZ Yes Circle:Coastal Moderate High No Based upon information provided by the applicant, it appears that the potable water supply: meets conditionally meets does not meet the conditions of RCW 19.27.097 and the Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings. Application Reviewed by Date Date Fee Receipt# Check# Case#BLD Jefferson County Permit Center, 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend WA 98368 WATER AVAILABILITY NOTIFICATION PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM TO: Jefferson County Environmental Health Department FROM: (Water System Name) System Operator State ID Number Total connections for which system is approved Number of service connections existing (in use) Number of service connections committed Date and results of most recent water bacteriological analysis The water system is capable of and will supply potable water to the following location: Assessors Parcel ID# Legal Description Site Address Operator Signature Date EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS SERVICE COMMITMENT H:lhomelpfncnttinfohkhlpubwater 8/95 4 tr, tr\ cri tj t t 1,10,-.11„,,, I f Helnixr with Perinittiar in 23 Washington Comities 124 Harrison Street Port Townsend WA 98368 360-385-6860 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter gives our permission to Barbara Blowers to act as my agent in the process to obtain a Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination for my property whose ta--• number is 921332030 4°1? G •rge Herion c •-/ Leslie Herion „J! („7"J road Page 1 of 1 ROAD LOG INFORMATION FOR N BAYVIEW DR ROAD NUMBER:P111 ROAD NAME:N BAYVIEW DR CROSSROAD NUMBER:C558009 CROSSROAD:MATS MATS BEACH RD CROSSROAD MILE POST:0.46 CROSSROAD LEFT OR RIGHT:L ROAD LENGTH:6.09 GRID ROAD STARTS:F-5-K MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS SEARCH ROAD SEARCH CREATION DATE SEARCH http://isserver/address/RoadDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=P111 4/15/2010 3 (n c OO Z uuiu -''wfillWaiirilet3 6.11 re c w z,' c 'C' c ''. ,;:,- M W W 0 N z cn 1- N n ()1 - N6Z - 4f 4/VAN) m CC n O V) O V) O G o U Z o I F,^ W ADMIRALTY INLET z n m 1 m I \ ". I \ °" I 1v „7.; \ W I ■ OtT aao NON OI U' r� U ON Op ■ O U am oa ro �" \ImLL 1 r Rtj n z \ ,\ nMffwo 1;".4° Q") ! ny o+ \pqo �p � �0 �Z i c9 ) >(( Z . x Cos 9'%ztciie U ' Qo rt'• 1 +r u .. A (,OOC 3 JO.OSI M�%Yl 111;0 �V� °'P - - - - Ll0iff LZ6 oPO maacln .i PAN.( ii ewolAOC lfo �l.xv1 v v) O).E�E .... am so snv /�l�l $p JO.ml 2)i�Yl -5 - (I^1 _ Z a .10ZnKa (/ °'z O e p73 1„ 44°-r ("xv1 wa a,) L c a w7 00�a ``•4 z Jrev w u m?b=. �'zu MO aioznl. m / 0-a 00'001 < m \.),... >-a os'.fl 6 'cI • r 9 / m x 1 a=tla G^ J E,&..,_,Z O aJF . I as cf6 < M 0 N N ! \ i1 r`rq o r o a o •( v .° �p� 07 I- R n ooa'1.42:2/,,:i o o cie V tn r' O pJ M p) F I° '"1.a.Jnav n xvL u m J1[) , e•^ I.°C0.0 JO.A1xY1 O r NO~ � w °I 0600LVSKa ��1 m,n3 '10 N O O VO a6'o (S�cwcctsa /yJ LL- a < � moN I (Z/1 M)x xxx 1,(...1 n +rtJ LU x a x so uc.°a•'o ovozoc Ka Z vd 1 "ttise L a�.a. • t�) azoz¢Ka B '1 Oa irr, �[ ! J o ¢ g ^Q o I.o w i s o W a a b ° —dV;'��t — .-.a 0 T oga; n°m $ a 2r I- 3 x< i 2! 4 "4 a s Oi N F N N 8 8: U M " O x1 " c o MU3rr 01 fV m u�� _1/)mOn = mO�o a. R1 ^ HW N O1 _ fQ __ m 1ts01 S z soar a ° 3 r R" °a n zc 3 n 3A1: M3IAAV9 N z I„.3 n O z • 00 0(' zx„'9 I' N ° S SELOLn Ka M\N M N a O1W T $ ox�o a g v3 mz 1 _ r3 R w~.5" mace I OVt J o d o N a M\0 O _ 0 mz� _ Vi a z ¢ oz u n3 a O xN\� O M K O s ,_O X m RI 0 rna_Izn m a[ N fS'O98 11 ^_ N M (31-N60-02 ill 3N) V N — 88 v. 3 3 °w - O U 11 0 11 ° h §:74.w a 0 x 0m •F u < boo F W o S — `= i d M 4, wm 6ro $o$ a fib+ ° - a zL ow — ° o' N 3 : ..1 is< 1"a� sN ZVi ° < o g.?oa Y a <im . Z ° za00 o — 8 €80a '0 i u‘,11 i w s ° m o c '6 caaFOO 8 13 '5g PA uWN *L IV vi UAW s '5u°k'<'' $www6'' 0 I°,i-fla o Xr o 8,i''§? ' u 5 t • ~� ./ \ /' A.. :./ ot X illiii. s\ ........._ _______. ___-- ---\"" j,., ---:\-1 N al C 13 16 .► -u O o sS OY♦ ♦♦,f��� ,Ow „* ,'i �♦ _♦�jgv:Q I E I vj CO A3 `� i •ti♦ d 1 3 L • / 3 W jj i 44/,Q � ♦* ' ii , -,..,,,,,,, _, ,/ cn jf ♦ �\ V • ot / Ir • • qg f.,... • \ 7 1� co xm V v O O 0. 4• \ ..N i /j �! r .... .... „ /ii 1 0 C O O b? ► 1 • f * 0 0 44 , A. •• 4. ■ ,4 R i4 I E111 ►4 x 11! p° +4 /A - g FT -5 i-r•Ii / I pi 4. 1 \ ►V ' CD °i o o m mo a N 3 ►ti 3 ° ! a ►t N O. .n 7 -°3 �� .1 i m' I o 3 ' m � m a • F a ,"' m ITI m m N m ♦ 3 F.m m ``,r� 4 Eli mm3H z ° N C f tilEa m ii j d S° *• N • •m m m 14 77 0 2 m 1♦i 1� y♦' . .< - i♦1 it.CD O. i. ' 'D '91 / 4 f '_ \ ♦ V Ilk • {'''{fir" `►► = m a. N ,7/ b , to r - to 1. %/ / 4111,1):::::.!.:1;11;:::::::;.:1.:::::!.:.:.:: '4 U 41 g• 0 0 Ca 4 h.- .4141,N4 . 4.,:. ,,,,.. / ..... * 00g) o- Ill 2. 3 7,-...r.-.; ,«- 1,3 .N ►"` mu^ ►��/ 3�T S 4 4461, .... / .-*---.7 .--------. ... ''0111 \ i i .-�`\.....____�g1 / �a _r._ / 1 0 � / / / o D � — o 0 / )", - v o *'.. ....,--- - ---t-'' / i i / / / '57. * rCT CO ao" Wp `W p � G7 � // 1 / 90 W W N co (D / / �/ co .0 SU " N O -0 (n O N ,r� /5. / ----"'" y C N N -p0W -0 °. O "C / t —i o 3 . C a / 1 / i / c_ "( l perp 3 D ,-------�^ j Q G r' ° ° '_— ``,r. / • , �— C o • .'........y 1/ ".".7" • O .........----t \ zt• •\ \.f':::e. \.,...__..... --'--... / ig Co o 166 ......"-----.. .._—_. --- .....--\-- v a.♦e o a . TT_.�„.•x 11'1 '"h..... : ^ � .. .I.•.•.4.♦♦.♦♦♦.•• ,•,0 N Ni O Iv co N3 ,� i♦ �..i I I .. A . I 3 . • Fr • W !i I N / • l \ ♦i • ;41 a I I --'• + ♦ -"' / •. S 3 a– $Si 44 �� 3.m 3 og .;;<. ♦ 1 'Hit \ I r.1 6,Z �G ► • • -0q 3 = i� `JJE �tilt ' i Ct� m ao i1 I !, N CO.o g _. a r.. �� _ i o D tr r1 / 0 =n a w . �� .."''''N i O ♦i ► It )1:1 t o iliii l • 1 I / 0 (tf I a 0. ►1 ►♦i ►A • oi a.. a _ 1 ii. . 9, a,= -o !. NNN, ` m_,. ..,_.... 5.m M. m C1 4 -•N r a \ r Q� ‘\\, N \ ir d 3 •1 3 � 3m ♦ !c C m r�J a g m 3 �, - ♦! : \ p, ,,,,,,,, ...,. .... (' • � w � \ m Q. 111 `,, , r.. , i O• vs Q i • . :-:.:=?:,1-1,t7 IN;.i „ .1,-,.,vi..„440 : / / • ,.,:... o ,• ft i1 P r r: • 7 a = w ::,-.. A■ '1".. Vi■ -u. . ...'.4.41\-AkNW ' •". al'7 e I NI\ElkH/ $ -. 1 : g •►, ,.......7 -•••■,.....I% E g _ iE C A ,,,,, ,, ,,,\: •::. , .,,,,,, .,. .„.,......_.. .... A / i ( .. • / .. \ / i / li. • . @ 0, CD / • / "N *to 5. / i r ma y a' c,.mo / • / e--,.... fo g Wo - O wv / // Ill/ / L.�,+ \ 7 s rn Ga / /V * ... ‘`,....„...... / /7//,__------ ................. • 2 May 5, 2010 GEORGE HERION 10716 S BALTIMORE RD SPOKANE WA 992239544 RE: SITE ADDRESS: N. BAYVIEW DR MLA#: MLA10-00025 Dear GEORGE HERION: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of Community Development Staff c: File BARBARA BLOWERS 124 HARRISON ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 May 5, 2010 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA10-00025 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: SPAAD-Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for residential development Location: Parcel number 921 332 030, Section 33, Township 29N, Range 1E, WM, located off Bayview Dr, Port Ludlow 98365 Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or by May 19,2010. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days,your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary,the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, c: , APN: "I 133QQ30 NAME: EFILI on MLA# 10 "8 Add.APN Add.APN NOT Printed Printed SPAAD Category Intake Req's ❑ County Zoning ❑ Cases/Conditions by Parcel# ❑ ❑ Water Service Area ❑ ❑ Printed from EH map set Plat Maps ❑ ❑ Laserfiche Documents ❑ ❑ Road System *"" ***, Leave on for all or most maps Assessor Maps-H ❑ 1:g High-light parcel on Map Lots ❑ ❑ Parcel Tags-H ❑ ❑ Permits-H ❑ ❑ 2000 Shoreline Photos ❑ ❑ Left/Mid/Right Shoreline Arcs ❑ ❑ Shoreline Polygons ❑ ❑ DNR FP Stream Class ❑ ❑ DNR Stream ❑ ❑ DNR Water Bodies ❑ LFA-Fish ❑ ❑ Soils-H ❑ ❑ No parcel label Marbled Murrulets ❑ ❑ Heritage Points ❑ ❑ Type: Spotted Owls ❑ ❑ Bald Eagle Nests&Buffers ❑ No parcel label Priority Habitats and Species 8/06 ❑ V ❑ Type Wetlands CI 0 Rare Plants -Ecosystems ❑ ❑ Type: Seismic Hazard ❑ ❑ Landslide Hazard ❑ ❑ FEMA FIRMS ❑ ❑ `Map Panel#: Erosion Hazard ❑ ❑ Critical Aquifer Recharge areas Wells-Chloride ❑ ❑ No parcel label Mineral Lands ❑ ❑ No peel label SIPZ ❑ ❑ Shoreline Slope Stability ❑ ❑ Chanel Migration ❑ ❑ Airport Overlays ❑ No Shooting Zone ❑ ❑- County Zoning-UGA ❑ ❑ LIDAR Hillshade ❑ ❑ No parcel label-Printed with Countours USGS Topos ❑ ❑ No parcel label 2005 Aerial Photos El ❑ No parcel label - Assessor's Info O . MLA Number Form ❑ ❑ Pre Application File 0 Reviewer Letter Sent El -`p. Eagle$ Wetland 0 Eagle Plan Required ❑ ❑ 1 page tJ Habitat Man Plan D ESA Map Checklist 10-13-2008 Map Output Page 1 of 3 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map "K.1.1 / 2,"442.2,22 2:4/1,1C.:K:32 MaX:22 , "4.201.23 '92'332,241,2 ' 2 2: 33a).39 92'332030 92.13203o , r Li2C3 92'332.2.29 92'222.2.3:: 2 22.2.1' 2'322 2.. N etyvieh br 2,2'222016 921 3320' '322.2.22 5 92t1320/7 .- • 23MX 33X:1 92'333002 92'333,1.22 do.1 .a-e 10:oar.2crt-a GO, http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 2/4/2010 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ',..■++,1re:•::.2,:: 917400032 e.;;.1•2.:..:2,:, s.., •-0,- I . . ) 1 c eeeic.x.2'----• -Y 0 :.'i'.I....X.'Si---- .• 97740002.4 — . • I.. • i Legend . Selected Features I JC Roads '1 1 I Parcels-H 924 332030 Bald Eagle Buffers — 921332°344k .. - ' 92'332033 _ i 1,12cr atkr 2...e,:i'e 9z'2 2 Z.:19 i 44,Xf SAS -- 921332u2.5 -- 1. , i all ar St13-0,1c 921332032 —7..- 4.:ITI.,,, Boundaries 921332u'/ , 1 Boundaries 921332016 f . i 921122:22 c '42'1320/8 i 7 Jdakssan Count? et ....t,.. .:. 0 orkr Coaentes A1,4t'2 2 2,■::..)2,:.,2'2 2,2C.:z..., ,.. ,'"....- .... FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Feb 04 14:25:39 2010 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 2/4/2010 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 i ao _s�,/f I ( `,I `j ill F IWO'. 921332002 AGO,�'., _•\` +{' _ 921332002 Ct r,' / 1 (: (*) '''''')\\ ...-----. l I, 1 ----:� - 11111111b'_,� I� \ Legend ,-�„ _,._ I tti I ,I i, 1 I Selected Features t`fir` 921332030.,:::::][-____-::::::::::----921332030. ----'-'.\\'''' JC Roads 921332030 ' -----_ �, ,:�1 1 I Parcels-k t ` ) I I Contours t 921332033- a �I �`- �. It i I torantCo-roux 11 �`' IIIJ �yf 5]roc:Corox �__ - 921332029 921332029 ( � r J I 8oundanes ti i ■ i t .I 92.332(Xi.b ��'. 1}_( 1 � r' �� ��_ I t �1�'I, It SmscriCarr.Y t I 1 \...\-1 - ,1 r'F JE 'I 7 Om'Cost ar 1 \'-921332032 I �Y.,l 12.3320t2 9121332035-- _� l }rr 921332032 ,J 1 9213320117' • I I l 2232016 921332018 - J 921332009 1 921332017-' _��-_- 921332010 921a32i 1_ y — � s / -,,---- \l.,..a:didtr -eesscri Co.'r..,_.,. >:e . ` Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 \ � ' . , � . 92m32002 ='3-2..c^u / ( If ~~~ Legend �-� Selected Features | U ^cm=u" Pa rya** ox3am� araum� � 921332039 nnvmems�nn � U C°°°~"pmub=us. »w^ «cre="yanpA102°a 921332033 ..V-ban„Al ^�,ter. 921332029 �,�u� �� / ( *�s 921332033 _- v°===icy "ler ��b.r= _I_ — -��— "ovf Oro- | | | 92'3320'2 921332025 auo,oa�, � | ' | / \ 921332032 'a��.u�� | | / '/ / �� w"° | | | ' 921332017 |�msm� | 921332009 | 921332016 �mz�m - ! � m�c== . �mmm� �mam,, m*`�m / | .�/ | ! .__ I � � i M ,�"� ^�=.u�=c.�°,",",�� ----------- I =^ ��=~~ e �m FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attes to the accuracy of the data contaired herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:06:54 2010 httn://giaacrvcr/mervlet/coro.cuci.o:riulap.Barinoap?ServiceNamc~~ovozup&Clieu1Vcroioo=4.... 4/15/2010 , Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 Ire A - s Legend 921332002 92'332x302 Selected Features • JC Roads Parcels-H DKR FP Stream Classification >Aet N Nm SIN Nast.* a 1 No-Nar isn Msa..0�cr ma 921332030 921332030 f T Ns.Na-9 i Hasx s^nross 921332039 I DNR Streams 921332033 wf los 9 ."— ° 1 ,A Ty0e 5 921332029 921332029 f.`/ T}m4 / Tim e 3 7 921332036 ff. Tym2 tie Type 1 921332032 lN I J` � _ -- ___ _ 5RR'v4'aier Bodes 921332012 92/332025 I — 921332032 . ■ 1 9213320/8 I 92133202161 90 es.vuo,3 133201 921332009 , 921332010 921332011 921332016 /f LFA-Fish i I. r 1 _ i I Boundaries I _— O _e�+sm Cart. Max,re.-dei try.Nsilawi Corny Ceara Ssmcas.0 _______I______-----. "'�" n C.re FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:13:53 2010 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 4/15/2010 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921323030 1 1 ill 921332002 921332002 inr,2 e . I. i, Legend Selected Features 921332030 JC Roads 92133'2035 P)nets-k 1-_I WRIA 17 Sub-Basins 921332033 Boundaries ' ff++I, r7 .cnc n� corn. 921332029 921332029 IIi I 'oV I n 4rKr Gurrtn. 921332135 921332032 11 r r _[`4313£2 921332025 r —.. !,__._._._._ 92'332032 ^yak / 1 � 921332017 921332018 ; r Ili 92t332Vt6 921332011 921332009 921332010 921332011 92133201S _ 4 , , , ___-------_ Ma,.1..r.4,4 o,-C.,•....I I Cow r,,:r c.. c.cv.GtS ` - _ter 0 2971 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:19:07 2010 http://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 4/15/2010 . . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921323030 \ | ' " /444.1.161 „ i, :42'zz.K.0 e'o»� / .=«l ^ Legend ` Selected Features 2C Roads � �� wum�owu"=*u sru�v� yz's�s �'»�,� ' Spotted Owls• ' -lc , eamca«w� x , �_~~°�,� ~^ _ ~^ =_~~_^� aaucanmou�o 923�~ ,JAY a/88- =uSuler 92'232029 92`3 �u� m^°o*Kred.=�� | * / i."i * Priority and svomo uu^»ass ' Boundaries | 92'232034 c El -c••85-34n Cam �� � �a= 92'224v'4 o/'`2.2s, D �.Curses s �-'' .`�o,v | • �',sys ,'2��� �`,�»^'— �'z�v � �'`�v ' s'��z, ___~~/ A '-__� u 29711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:19:50 2010 hrtp://vioscrvcr/mcrvlet/coro.cmi.esrinonp.Bsriouop?ScrviccNome=ovmop&Clicn1\7eruiou=4.... 4/15/2010 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 r. 921332002 `d2'332+-102 Legend 0 Seieded Features t'` JC Roads r._,. Parcsts-H 921332030 921332030 Landslide Hazard 921332039 N Sades n Mogi 921332033 921332029 921332029 FEMA FIRMS 91133200 , 921332032 ■ Orr, I I . Erosion Hazard Boundaries 921332012 921332025 I Casty i .°� j 911332032' ❑ � t ❑ WY*. 1 i 9121332017 921332018 ❑ q Caro■ 921332016 921332009 921332017 , 921332010 921332011 921332015 tl i M1aa 7a.dcd trr-Yebrsm carmr calm Sc.,:st,.::,6 — FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:20:36, 010 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 4/15/2010 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921323030 1' I� f ` 1 . ' 92•3320022.4' r. i, i, ,,, /. .... . .„, - -._. ti Legend 3<a3.ted Features JC Roads 92.332030 924332030 - Par0els-H 4'1 1 e No 9 '---■ r Welt'.-Chbride 100a less * WM.,'to7 4-1d 200 ._... * 270 a?tg ' 921332029 92`33202? SIPZ A.R..sx;.h'Z Boundaries .:•i:wri Cott}. I 1 .,r I j ZIZW ru.cloi Zr, c -,oiCIrr cr... a.Gl3 _ 29/1: FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its tY Y Y p correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:21:21 2010 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2010 • . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921323030 1----- 7 I\ • 1 O .4 92'332,202 IIIIPmor 1 ( /( \ 11, "NEW&FP-Pj \ Legend \ \ F7 \ • Selected Features C Roads ads ...2 .:2.z...-..,.. Parciels-H \ 11 Shoreline Slope Stabidy e 23z_22 A n etto-nedate el E J-tstale 94'224,249 44'.'14,.:4e 92'332,_■35 1 ( 111. J tf..40KIRecelt-I ki.ck. ED J tv•Sle Cui--1 6 i • 11111 Modied Ste.!24■2,24 Boundaries 7 .c+ers4n Cart, 92'33'20'2 1 921332032 ..---"------- 921332017 ■921332018 .,4•3 2 2,-.::::, •-''-'-"- 921332°16 921332017 22C-1 '.41332011 921332018 A 7,---..-- 1 , 1 ....,.... -______....._ 29711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:21:49 2010 , . http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2010 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 , 1 .. \ ( / .. 1 00 A lir{\\‘ :•2'.1.'e.....4 1.°°---- --'6.---\\ Legend iOf* Selected Features 7çi .JC Roads • 1 ...- tt Parcels-H ',...,_„‘ „......„, contours I , - ''''..e\s. 0.. iitimei 50 rout Comcu ' ti DNR FP Stream Classrficaton 1 ,' ram r MMus N Nan 9s01 Ham tat ... ,. . ) , ) 7 i A. , Np ( N.:014mm Map Im A3.011.2 I,,..'" ■ ` ' Ns Nmi ism Maam`.&slum .. /*/* S Mrantrasa S-0re m / ..- --- ) ) 4 l DNR Streams \I ) , 00' Typa a ...___ . „,..„ Type \ . . -...—__,... .. • ' . , 7 //y/ LFA-Ftsh Boundanes _ OF 7 ..e.k.c.Casty \ — Maps tramded by aelliersam Carty CAM, .. . . 1.-- 4 ' , c.., 1 2S711 0 0:vs Commas FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 16:34:22 2010 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2010 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921332030 Iriliiire lik.1 Legend Selected Features i . .0 Roads & ., ._i Parcels-H I —r- 1 DhR FP Stream Ciassitiration �f F Fish Masa0. !-Afot N•Nmisn Mars ,. .' No Nan tan Ma:%Acar,j _ _ f;. Ns=Nm.Ssn Nas:a Smcu _ �,-' f DNR Streams IMO fir- i g Typo 5 • 1 , Type to Type 3 52'334- ::,. .1 Typtt 2 'F--.. _— -_ ��I T 1n 1 ,5444 I _ /y, Omer 92t332f}25 7 ti' /f LFA-Fish 2009 Aerial Photos ( 9213320t { 921332046 9213320;l z I Boundaries 1 92' 332{5 44 ::... t i exlesun Canty * , - 0 Ober Carries FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Apr 15 18:24:011 2010 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 4/15/2010 .., t , s . ' . 't': A'".,./'"■ v., ' "'4 ' '.),;-,..,1*,' li„ -t'i#, ,, , 4 ,•:.,1;,'.'-!'"?...,,,,.:1:v...,' l, :, , $' -_ .„ ,,,k•'%v'.?;;,-.i:‘-‘ • ,-,.--44 „;... • ', *, ‘,,:41,,„.-:ro ;51 ;'-' . ,i''" v„,,,,41.,',, ,' ,..,,;,;;:..., , "4\qm' lr•vi- "C.I'l ''' " '"'' ' .''-'1-r'''''''''';',A, 74'457 ',5i-ie5,.. ' §ivia'" 4', 4.,,,'" 55. :s- )071/4:3,V.'"." '6rt'''..',..."• '..4.41.,,",..4.11$,;2N,15. '' Y.`.,,f'.. '''' ' .1'''• .'t,„:!* ..it,t,'„,,,, .,' ,„, ' -17, '' #1/4.- i.'" ';, 4v, ,,i,,.,..,,,' ,- , ,1.,„;t,,,,,, , -4,, ) . . .' „ '..4 :i•',";\.,4..„,', ''`,',' 1`,,,'''' ;, ' `-,',.,=..• '' ', 0,ALL`j'41,f;rAilYi%,.' ', ..,iO4,4,44;': 0,.r.. .T' . , - , ..s.— - ..' 4, -,,,r..0 i.,-7.1 .4';'t..,gti.■••t/,`,- ''' °` ' !"‘...,,,,7'"4", `Iti„;.:i , ' '• '•ZVI+,• '`C'' ' 414sv .,„ . , . ,, ,` ,4,':''' ;t4,,,,,t.,,,i '''14.14 .' , A',,,''',,''''T'--;;:";'('''.;04tse. ".<'",';'#/.•''' ' ..,,t..4,1 ' $.,'...,`!"..#:...A.:3,, ?' .4'. '''' "''' ' • . 'i' ,,,, ,'li:. ''''' ...'':"'''" ' ',' :t4"'' wi3O,' '44.4 ,•'',..,;.'V'1.""), 1.; .% ,1,, li.•1 ,,,,,444-1;,... -list ,:e'.....„,,i1N4 :;,.., -,,,,, kv...,4,,,,, , , ,'14. '''''''',4'.:,.. ' , ''4"..r,,s'‘•' ‘;'4'.'.' ' :,b1177,1'‘'i,. ..,!nkikiti4,44:,6';.'„'' 14?■■'',' ';',''''''.9"A'X';.,„_' ' ''''r.-4AV''.'• rt- ''''''-s-';',4'r '` '''4'. : -'1: 1 ',;',InA7-'. '''hi(N::,,■-''t,It'-'%,, ;,E). ,e0 , ''-' ;' i. . .'."''' A ,•4 • ,-',:;.,, .4,,-„,11?i'N ,..'."',-,' ,<----.4,',,,'„'„-• , - ,. ' : .;.-. "-k ,;.! iiii' '' ''‘' ei.,,,, 04,., ,:tii 71.,..,''.+. $, .'''' ''' ,, ,..„, 14$ * ! .,..„•,•1::,,,.,,ye, .4., J•efr;.4,,-;,',!;',,,',-,..,''''','-',:-4,:-., - , .....'-' •,.'',,'-'C---.,- '- • 'i "4'''i:,-.1*,1—..-,I, .--: ''-•ii,,,,,k, ,., ,,,,,:,e4,0).-..;,- ,,, '•,=7-... ,..:,..:. ,,_. t..,...-,...iJ. ,,.-t.,:t.)..,. . ,,,,,,..„ ,, ..•,,,,,d -"- ',.'I 4 177Y' .`.■`' .1C■ki.: A ,V..‘,.....,, , ,_ .44.t .,_ ',,t,,_L";' '.r,-4404-4„,' t., •-;:. "Z.,:,:jli tik k N VP. _ -,;!: 4 ' ift '''' .,.:,erVik,),I, ''''',;tr "•,•=-A-Pc-z4,•:-,,,, f '5.#14,1V.,e,k;',' ' -'44-4----'‘ ','", ,..': !'' 'Y - • -.i 7,'‘' ,,,,;:. , -.-,,...,\•,;rt•-• '''.,-%•;t7,iii, ,. ..t.,... - ‘.,—.4..A.4,,,-.4-4, , ittk114 ,-,-- - • , .4,,, viti..., ,,,, f...,_*,... _ -,..:• -‘e.,-,,,... , : 4'i ,-- ';` "`;, ,, 7` . ..-.1 A r'4,- -* '''',, `'.4.4 '..',:p43 ,—,,.;;;:. • ,..'', "''' ',, '■, 't41‘17.4404;',',: ''' l'''"4',,:' V:illi ' ..--'. .., ' &:.•:,'-'1.'*'4'■',; ..*34't2.- ,17 ' , '4'' '",' • ; ,. P•!,' ' -, - %'"f4'' 4,4,,, -V „, . , ,.'AT, . ,fri'-t4e,e';,". Uf•',,,,, 4 4;t4t,"`11 , -, ,,,. , .05i 44. - ,`,."4.A144 All.•.4 ..,;,..• ,. ..:., . .,- '• ,t,.'. ,4,0,,10- 4% ...,.. 0:,-&,.-- !:. ,i..,,,, .„-',:.. .,„?.... ...,. ::, ..(fV, - , ' .,...;.„, ..., ,., .;•,,,i. ;1' .,,,,, , -..., - iis,';',67,44,'''4..- ' ''''Tt' ti:,-'t „...:,,,'" . ,‘r0441.,, „,e,i45 ,‘"5 c;f2i,; „ ;'-.,-4 , 14444A ,.A:,. ItItt V 4,,,,,,,,, •` ' - • ', „ ‘,':-tii•N,"?-4. - ' r°'4'4'7. 4.41,it 1, '4771-.;140,,.. '5,..4A11,.;, -; ,,,t,_ . :,..-r,„".si-,,, ,-.Al , lt,..774,7 41,'-.1 4 :''''''', '1' .-..,,„if. , ,..,"-'s4Atitt,,Itk'4 Ii\v !*---". obtvi 4,N-...s%,- .,--4.-,i4 , . -,-,,, 17.- -- --• - -,' C) z, . ,....,,744,,,,:, ' q,.,1':",-;,,4. ,,:e",','' `r '' c" ''',4-,- 144,0:.',=. t.,-,.... i,, ...• ,, ,_, --,-. -,,_,,,i,.. ..-_.1.—i,, •,., ,,,,,...,•',,••.1,,-,- •iitr...4..,-k. :.-,. ''- . " i,..,;-,... ' .., 5,-:4415' -i.....---,,,,...,, t,',:"1,,,V.--: , C:) ... S'" ' , ' cy) 4, . .0t4lrf.e.,';'-`,4;\ _a -, _..a ., k':!7.4...4.,...,',-% , ,,.4/..,17f,'''''-: -•-• : -• 1='"t-t s4 "414'' . • . '114/;' '-''' -''--. '''' -4.• ''''it '''' ,, > ,.14.CY i ."'.-''''''' I 7•'''', ,'', .,-“,` . '47%%;WI,,IA ). ", ....'‘' ■.,.. sir- ',--‘,,-i".'.,77-,„, ';, r''' kt,%`.,',.i.'i d:* ")*':It - :4/ ;:!,":5*,*0., i' :-!- '' •■■■4:' ,44i, N`e,0_4Z..4'' '4,■''''' lt ' ''', 7;,,,,A.,,. 7'W'Ir.';',4,4' vieva ,,_•;47...,,,t,4t0„,....,„.., „1„,,....,e,,u,,,x4r.„...,, ,„116 4,';, .),'"c',',. 7,,,,,..-?"01,41:n,0 4,til- ' ..„'.,i--4.t.: -,, ' - --,,,,,„. 4._,,,,"jf4.4%, ,,,,..!, -.:1:k. 'A''' ,,e .--at'', .0•;;,',,,Oki, If,„' , ..',. i c'ht ''.,,,,, 4;,`1.,,:2 :, ,-,.,. '•', . Is,."1-4...5 i A. 4, '.„p ,•;:. ...,,,, .-,.,--,4: '' ',7,-,',',-,iiii&t:'17,,,,t.,.44z%,-,,,,4-;k71',',-:;.,t-,,-.,'4.,,-,'- --'-tit4efr-*,1- 0-,,,if.t,t,4.`vta,..'''- -'\',14‘, .,,i,-.4 ' ""4;''-.tf*,Y.*41-.i.725.„"„ ,'•;.4.;` 41i,t,**'..:-!?,..N.*'5,',,,„,i',...?`5-'ffv.:VIi-o,r ,,i. ''':'.4,1iV.;;5-y :,. 14.5,,e4 44 4 ',4r. At,Oi.„..",/,0 1 ,It!',4,:.°`t t,'•*-',44''',',4i't`.:'44,,,'',,V,y4'41,,,,„ ',I:- ,'"'-,* ‘,14-4-- (4'7‘,".,k,41',„‘k";•; `, „,„ ,:' ,,,,- , , „.t, , `e, ':'t,:,,',,, , -'#,,i''ts-,'.',-a",. --%/«,',...,,Atm*, ' •„$°,,,,SIt .` -'1,‘,„,;„,'''.."4‘.:,1..t,4",,*#.,,'-'"'L.7,1',,ktts'e "'.' .47 ',4i,,,, '' ''.'.7,',.:7'77,;,,t, , 1,7 Vs'''I''lier '+ '4=',7% 7 ',7.6.7i Agtit.',17,',Yti,L%.°''''"i•477".7.. ri-i'A ''-,i,„‘,.... 2*.Ciii,1/4■'..‘ , W4litt., ' ' '00.9,512.,.'„,',''',-,...;(7':',2.4.•.t',7';,;',.,:if .. 4'''''':.7,‘; ',4;'11..e.i.Cy*Ili..,?"a"fr.P.'''''''.',W it*:':'''.%* ....t..k'7'.'74'.'' 4siti't'.'''.,17. 1,;, `":...A.,"gZ7'..:.7,7,•: ::',-...'. * ..7 ,,,, • , ,,. 4, `,+(k ,,," . '''..Ve,,, .". ...,`i'..`,4,,3,141., ] it''''' ,,,' ,- L';.-24,itt, ,,,„..--' .." ''‘''''..35;`-`,`'`.1 ..,' 41', .11•4'k '..ii' •;.'L,.. .7..4'2 " :,=-,*k,,Aki*5,i,•": 4" '' '''''' - ''''''''';'''-'4',.',40:, ',,,,,"' t-,,, , •'''' 144 ..1'''',,'",t',,,$..,:-' ,-..-.-',..k-I"`',-,4ki,t,,,z:);'..,:,,';',„...„'.." . :, .,. ,-,,.te„,„'; 4,4 .4,',•• ,..* s■,..,', ,47" ,. .1,1'.,44,,,,i..„ P,, ,,'', ,' ,e, - ov.**: '.-,-, 1 '' ,, -444iiii "',,,,t,, ''14x,,. ..'tt, 'Ht.;Y,'S.';■,,I,',i,' t',''''' 'VI,, ,`"` .. , "",.1)'' ' t1,i ■ 44i,It't ii;`;'■' l''.. ■L" ''•-'i', . 4, /q j,ii4,.■,,,V,...:• tl,',74-.,,‘„,"1,.. ,..-,. ,,4iittiol;:,.,",' ,Alk:' , s 4t/A.4k.i.,,,,,77,io-r;', ,.;'.v4 , .,..:„.; .; 44.:•4....,,'`,.4",, —', ',;1.774:-, ,•.:,:',.',',4,,,,:i",7i:,17.r;,,..4,V.1 4,, ,' .., ,„,, ..461... ':, `0,,,,*." 1'4 ,, ,L''' ' 4 ,4 0." -q.ii,P.--.5..,.. , ;55:,- i y4,t), 1;2'.„,,p, : ,...,, i, Ir..'',4 '''' ' ‘ ii -,‘,.,,,,•';',,,-(,•it',,,„1:‘,...„.„ -..--", 1,..- .... ,4i,,,k,4 APPLICATION FOR ROAD APPROACH PERMIT Jefferson County Permit# 1 Department of Community Development Receipt# � -- 621 Sheridan Street Check# Port Townsend,WA 98368 Date Paid 1-7 —(0 (360) 379-4450 APPLICANT PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION -CHECK BOXES THAT APPLY ElResidential Approach Logging Approach [J Temporary ElCommerical Approach Improvements Only Approach&Address County Road Name: Mile Post#: bialt..6.4_,L ' (office use only) pip• I hereby designate if4j JJ Applicant or Authorized Rep'-sentative(Contractor) to act -- my agent I matters related t.; this Contractor Lic.# app -•n for permi s). 3161. 4i'PA"' / ails ress Owner Si• ature Date (1)/U)(49A/A/ 9C)?/ 330263 II, City-State-Zip Code Parcel Number loe 19 6 - Telephone No. Flagging Color&Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS By sighing the application form,the applicant attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge and agrees to al conditions on the permit. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void I further agree to saw,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liablities,judgment,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspection. This right of entry shall expire when the County concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of this permit may negatively Impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the"Endangered Species Act"or"ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the appicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regardingyour action(s)even If you are in compliance with the Jefferson County Development Code The a Iicant;dmowlecges that h-,s . or it holds individual and non-transferable responsib ty for adh ring to and complying with the ESA. The l!'1' -nt j• rI d this disc) -.(nd signs and dates It below. . . II 11 _ �b 16 --- (A (CANT OR AUTHORIZED R R =EN ATIVE SIGNATURE) (DA ) Updated 2/12/2008 i j A T.--e)vcAil 6(5 ■mow 1 i c(:A VUdit-- ADDRESS REQUEST JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 Sheridan,Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)379-4450 APPLICANT: Please fill out item 1 through 8. Fee as per Jefferson County Fee Schedule 1. a New Address • C. ection • Change •Review DIkFF LEFT M.P. k RIGHT `DIFF.: 2. Applicant Name: t` ' \„,t4 044 4/1 3. Mailing Address: i, / Town/State/Zip 4. Telephone: Work ab b Home: , • 5. Location: Attach a Detailed Drawing or Map. Additional Fees May Be Required if More Than One Site Visit Is Necessary - *******PLEASE FLAG YOUR DRIVEWAY.******* Date Flagged:0/ /Z L/le Flagging Color Nine Digit Tax Parcel Number /02) j 2 6 3 4 Plat Name Block Lot 6. Road Name: 4/ 49-- Is this a PRIVATE or OINTY road? CIRCLE ONE Nearest Cross Road: 7. Neighbors'Address if Known: Name/Address: Name/Address: 8. Do You New=- o Construct a Driveway? YES or NO CIRCLE ONE FIELD NOTES 9. Was This S bmitted With A Buildin P it? YES or _ CIRCLE ONE r. SHADED AREAS OFFICE USE,ONLY, . New Address: Postal District Real Milepost 'Road 4: Left Right Fire District Iuilding Pennit4 . Plate Sent : '/ / Odd Even. Date Paid j /ZO/ 10 Check# 32 Receipt# i( 7 Date in Computer / / N JEFFERSON COUNTY �b � frt., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT y `-[621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend Washington 98368 3, 360/379-4450 . 360/379-4451 Fax i-2D-ID G www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment t: i(3G-4o Master Permit Application MLA: (C) -ZS Project scli�on( de separate sheets as necessary):Ai ) Tax Parcel Number: oR / 3 3C2 0 3 6 Property Size: 4, o o b (acres/ quare feet) Site Address and/ Directions to Prope : kl/VI.�G ri p/d, Property Owner(s)of Record: G eo , - I • e 'all) Telephone: , F.x: email: Mailing Address: # • Wig. - i�� TI Z...r_ kit 6,-L 3 Applicant/Agent(if di cren from owner): G.rlr �i Sawa, . , ' Telephone: " £ S -- &:& d _ #'— i� 1_� j ail: d S. Mailing Address: ►rN . • A,_� --' Z. /4 ./J I : -, (,k What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit El Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) • El Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑Home Business El Cottage Industry ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑Propane ❑Long Plat** ❑Sign 0 ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑All w ed Yes"Use Consistency Analysis 0 Vacation/Atterabi on** Qormwater Management 0 Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ite Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference El Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: r NATION OF AGENT I hereby designate MI h . V , W to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE ec. '&Iv Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is-true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any r-•ui -. later inspections. Staffs a• _— nd ri. t of entry will be assumed unless the applicant inform the Co my in writing at the :::ap• ', that a or/a wants prior noti•./�rG.�.r.:. / /✓L/ ' Date: 6/ Zv i o The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upo one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will no�iolate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if are in co liance with the Je , , (County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,,she or it holds individual and non-trans; . r= pons, I1 for adhering t-/7. •plying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer d signs d dates it below. Signature: /AIWA i . ArL./. / / i/Ii r: 4 Date: CD / U 1 G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 5-29-08.doc • CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 921332029 Printed: February 4, 2010 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SUB09-00019 MLA09-00319 LUCAS TRUSTEE I P Application Received: 9/28/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: BOUNDARY LINE AISJUS!MEN I No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ10-00021 MLA10-00025 HERION P Application Received: 1/21/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD No findings, conditions, or permissions found. RAP10-00009 MLA10-00025 HERION I C Application Received: 1/20/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 1/26/2010 No Rd Approach Required -Already Existing. Assigned Address only. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ZON10-00009 MLA10-00025 HERION I P Application Received: 1/20/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD 1.) The soils report enclosed with the SPAAD application supports a finding that an onsite sewage system can be installed on the property in the area evaluated. SPAAD approval DOES NOT constitute an onsite sewage system design approval. 2.) Any removal or disturbance of soil in the area evaluated may create site conditions that are unacceptable for the installation of an onsite sewage system and may invalidate this approval. 3.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five(5)years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five(5)year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.)and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Section 8.7 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to comence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Section 8.7 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). Page 1 of 1 ` Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 921332030 05/14/2007 Owner Mailing Address: GEORGE HERION 10716 S BALTIMORE RD SPOKANE WA 992239544 Site Address: Section: 33 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Port Ludlow(3) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 231 Planning area: Port Ludlow(7) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: S33 T29 R1E I TAX 31 WITH EASE © No Photo Available http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=921332030+... 2/4/2010 + 4 CC H 2 C3 LL _0 Z W O H co O .. •• O) O cf- CI) — C.I Z O -o — co cc o o L J -O X CC -o co ` C U O O I— O LL o O Z - 'O H O) co Q •- 7 L S L C) ti Q .O C) C) U Q Z 0 > O J 0. a X C) I— I— O O O) CD CD U) "O O 0 CI CC 'O I- LL) C = X d" 3 I— CD \ O Lf) 0 CO J C) O CT) -o Z O I C O H Cr Cr) •- CT) 3 CV X >- Cu W Cu I- 1` W CO CC 0) 'O CC O C$) W CD CD CO C W CO Q J W T.- W CZ Cr) W W Co CC Z I-I O CO CD ¢ O CD I- CC - LU S CC X . O I-1 J X CO 0_ Cu - I- CD Q ¢ CC Q O) CC I-I LU I- W CO CO J Cu X CD W S g CC 0) I- U7 W C) W -0 Cu - - X W W Z CC V I- C*) Z I— a) _J CD CO <C CD C)) 0_ CC Y O CO X I-I U) CO O ti O CI) CO C CC o a O W O a CD Cf) I- W -1-' ". U CD .- Cl) S CO - ++ 0 O O CD - Cr) O O O Cu CY) co Cr) I-I Cr Cu W 0) S O O O .- O O O 'O L sr) co C) a) Cu CT) O # C CD I-I a) •• L B L CC Y C - CI) CD 4-' CI) LU CI) CI) )) a) -- 7) S L a) C) co Q) -0 > co 0 L L Cl — O co C). L- 0 CO X a-+ C) 'O X CO CO 0- CO •- -- co a) I— I— X C} I— CA co q- * x 1- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET Y -E :. Date Time Comments I-20-I n L/z hr U arab h UL th7Jv 11i/51i° - ' ..h. if CA ittli-._k I:\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt May 18,2009 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW ` Pr''ectPl. tier: Masler#MLA10-00025 Review Type Project Description PRJ10-00021 SPAAD �� . ;I'/ C�� RAP10-00009 I No Rd Approach Required-Already Existing. Assigned Address • do only. ZON10-00009 I SPAAD Primary: GEORGE HERION Site Address: 10716 S BALTIMORE RD BAYVIEW DR SPOKANE WA 992239544 PORT LUDLOW WA, 98365 Project Location: Parcel number 921 332 030, Section 33, Township 29N,Range 1E, WM, located off Bayview Dr, Port Ludlow 98365 Parcel Number: 921332030 S-T-R: 33-29N-01E Total Acreag( 5 t 25 Legal Description S33 T29 RIE TAX 31 WITH EASE Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 3 Planning Area: 7 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: ILIU . �-- School 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: ep COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPRt,, WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area � 1 [ ] Plot plan states "property line" Assessor's Map(Property lines o' bmitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) Legal Access to Property 4g> NO r Parcel Tags or Scanned ■. uments YES No %T. ESA's: Special ReRopq Nearby YES OD Designated Ag l r / ' Shoreline Designation: 0 5 _ O _ d • arAI Shoreline Slope Stabil , . ES 0 nom IP M•.' Mr Stream Type:YE 0 Fish&Wildlif NO q Wetlands: YE j* Rare Plants:YES 40 Seismic: YES Or Landslide: YES Flood: YES k 0 Erosion: YES -°i Aquifer Recharge ''i -.:YES SIPZ: none At Ris igh Risk) Coastal CMZ: no : High Risk Mo Risk Disconnected CMZ Stormwa -r site plan submitted: Ye' o (Scli Forest Lands: YES alb Adjoining Forest Lan. . Co ercial Rural/ Inholding Stonnwater: New Impervious Surface G00!/ _Land Disturbing Activity_ ESA's 1111 Stonnwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 E. 'a:- ing A,,, Notice Provisions/Disclosur-• Airport YES rro RL YES � Forest Lands YES 01 4[ A_ Landscaping Required:Ye. No Parking Spaces Re.,:: ed • 2 Other i� Building Height: UBC Stand Impervious Surface coverage percentage: C�� Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only De____Total Building(s)Sizg;.0 RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,0 SF NC:7,500 SF GC:10,000 SF All others:subject to se 'c&water coratrairts/None specified Setbacks: Front: oZ ( 5- Right Side:[ ] � Left Side: � g Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: _ i/ It,_ Road Classification: �Ls., 1 ' . 1 • Z '• RIM I•IIV Road Approach: NOT • 0'D RAP SEPA Required: ` 1 MPT Flood Certificate: A a Existing Case(s)&Con ' ' n(s): �� Violations: Yes a o Recorded Date of Subdivision:_ iat Alli Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: Ili <5yrs=Plat Conditions lat or Old Ordinance Lots/Require Declaration of Restri ive Covenant YES g► submitted: YES Site Visit conducted YES Require Final Zoning Approval ES r ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan c N/A • • New Parcel Tags entered in it Plan N/ Y Special Reports Scanned N/ YES No parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued fine led description 921332030 MLA10-00025 PRJ10-00021 P SPAAD RAP 10-00009 C 1/26/2010 No Rd Approach Required-Already Existing. Assigned Address only. ZON10-00009 P SPAAD