Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LOG ITEM 56 -59
r , . . 0 0 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Wednesday,April 23,2014 10:04 AM To: ec2037 @att.com Subject: FW: MLA13-00116 AT&T Attachments: ZON13-00039 AT&T.PDF From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:53 PM To: 'Amanda Nations' Subject: MLA13-00116 AT&T Amanda, I received the attached comment letter today regarding the proposed tower on Coyle Road. It's important the proposal comply with the colocation policy of the Jefferson County Code. Please review and include a response when you reply to the November 27,2013 letter. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Zoe Ann Lamp, AICP Associate Planner, DRD Lead Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-9406 Fax: 360-379-4473 e-mail: zlamp@a,co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW Please note: The Department of Community Development is open to the public 9:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m. Monday- Thursday; Closed Noon- 1:00 p.m.; Closed Fridays. LOG ITEM 56' 1 . ( off I . 411, • To: Zoe Ann Lamp February 18,2014 Jefferson County Permit Department 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsen2 d,WA 9838 From: Bry on Gunnerson(Consultant) Jefferson County 911 81 Elkins Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339 RE: Case#ZONI3-00039:AT&T Mobility("AT&T")@ 93,95 Coyle Road,APN#601101003 Alternate Location Available per Jefferson County Permit Guidelines Dear Ms.Lamp: During our phone discussion in January,I informed you that there is an alternate and suitable location for AT&T to collocate its wireless services antennae and equipment,thus avoiding the need to construct a new tower,as requested by AT&T in its permit application referenced above. Background: Over the past 30 months,AT&T and Gunnerson,Consulting and Communication Site Services LLC ("GCCSS")(contractor for Jefferson County 911,"JeffCom911 )have exchanged emails an d phone calls regarding the collocation and use of the JeffCom911 tower located at 8630 Coyle Road,Quilcene,WA("Coyle Road Tower"). In May of 2011,JeffCom911 and AT&T entered into an initial agreement"Entry and Testing Agreement"attached. At that time,AT&T felt that the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower was the"best practical choice"for its needs. In discussions, JeffCom911 was not able to demonstrate clear ownership an d rights to the tower(a prerequisite to sublicensing to AT&T), due to conveyance issues with Jefferson County. Unable to resolve the ownership issues and sublicensing rights,AT&T embarked on other solutions,including submission of a proposal to Jefferson County to build a new tower structure. The Coyle Road Tower ownership issue has since been resolved by Jefferson County and JeffCom911.Accordingly, JeffCom911 is prepared to enter into a mutually acceptable commercial sublicense agreement with AT&T. The terms of an acceptable sublicense agreement had been discussed and initially negotiated with the AT&T development consultant some time ago,but was never executed upon due to the associated ownership issues. "�v '� gg�� $ `ter 4 b 0.v ;,ice v` :�. a• ' '" f• G ITEM D V _k, c 1ofV, • a 1 "Best practical location", according to Joe Riddle's quote by AT&T on 7/18/2012. The Coyle Road Tower was the most practical choice. When the tower ownership and complications of Jefferson County and JeffCom911 appeared to be unresolvable,AT&T looked elsewhere. eetr sewer IS sti loe 0(00*pe.rdde2<0.ndasa.rm. ien[ J.e eararurz l3i ac00,1,a9aa 0 r 0000.C,m,.0)0,eu m,.., C(b000,of r0.Te lade-ay,hoCC 000l.g.ee0n0ry.ceta 0vio4i ;..c»,a he proc<ssts Cave,Oa.e f0 e. :ede(eaa en,it.,rp.a xr-g!d.amatiral.✓. wed es the best practea!b:aoon forth,search mg AST has in the area,even though:hey would like to be further south and east,r Save subrne,,eO nfornatwn to AR the!r revue,and am 0rattegfor c:o come back es soar as Inear arythinp at aK,I I ne el touch.(you could l00400,01,ether randidae,o,eei:longer essceM begleest,agseeceted_:00nks for your tee,=ookvig femassi being able.o work 0000 you en this. 00 yeu have a=lo,ab0naugtianen end process ASTwoOM need to',Mk,th6 if me sae 00000,) Joe Riddle,Project Manager Cascadia PM '.. 386 90450:8 JeffCom911 approached AT&T for possible collocation: In November of 2013,JeffCom911 approached AT&T for possible collocation by moving its radio's and antenna's from the current Coyle Road Tower to the proposed AT&T location with the presumption that JeffCom911 may possibly abandon its Coyle Road Tower. However, since JeffCom911 and Jefferson County have now arrived at an understanding and resolution to the Coyle Road Tower,this collocation will not be necessary. Rights of AT&T to construct the proposed 200ft tower on Parcel #601101003: GCCSS had a discussion with the property owner on November 16,2013,wherein they discussed the AT&T ground lease agreement in reference to the intent of having JeffCom911 as a subtenant. At the time, the property owner believed that they would arrive at an agreement. Unfortunately, last week property owner suffered a serious medical incident and may be permanently incapacitated. On February 14,2014, AT&T confirmed that the proposed terms of an agreement with property owner are unacceptable to AT&T,and stated in an email to GCCSS: "The most recent lease form submitted by the LL was not anywhere near acceptable by AT&T form a business perspective. A deal was not imminent the project appeared to be in trouble of stalling permanentl . A new lease negotiation will need to happen with the assigned power of attorney for 1 We still have quite a few issues and business terms to negotiate before collocation agreements can be considered. Thanks.' It is possible that AT&T could arrive at an agreement with property owner or his legal representative at some time in the distant future,but this does not appear likely. Additionally,the property owner may not be of sufficient capacity to withdraw his consent given of AT&T's application for this tower. Coverage Comparison (Suitable Alternative): The AT&T proposed site on Mr. McDermott's land and the existing JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower site are 0.71 miles apart from each other with the ground elevation of the Coyle Road Tower site being slightly higher than the proposed AT&T site. The AT&T stated coverage objectives include the areas in and around Bangor Sub-Base. Attached are some coverage plots that indicate the differences with the current height of the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower and the proposed AT&T tower,at a height of 200ft. Additionally, JeffCom911 is open and willing to allow AT&T to modify or add height to the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower site in order to meet AT&T's objectives for its operations. Considering that JeffCom911 has offered to allow AT&T to increase the height of the Coyle Road Tower to 200ft,the coverage plots below clearly demonstrate how the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower "as-is" displays very similar coverage to the proposed new AT&T 200ft tower. Any coverage deficiencies that may be expressed by AT&T should be demonstrated by displaying all of the adjoining AT&T sites in the area in relationship to JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower Site or the proposed AT&T 200ft tower site. Any arguments of coverage deficiencies are only valid if another site does not fulfill the coverage area by using similar conventions for each location. 1 Redaction is for keeping the property owner's name confidential. LOG ITEM # 5 ' Page ' of ` _ • 0 Jefferson County will be in a difficult position to evaluate the arguments by AT&T or GCCSS, on behalf of JeffCom911, as it relates to defining which coverage deficiencies are truly determining factors that cannot be overcome by the use of the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower at any height. However, specific"drive test"devices,as well as third party engineers, are available that can present a neutral conclusion to Jefferson County. AT THE VERY LEAST, AT&T SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT ANY PURPORTED DEFICIENCIES ARE NOT ALTERNATIVELY CORRECTABLE AT ADJACENT LOCATIONS. AT&T should expend the costs of such neutral party's analysis, as agreed to by JeffCom911, Jefferson County and AT&T, if AT&T intends to continue with the ZON13-00039 application. Below is the"Worst Case"coverage differences with 850Mhz(left)and 1900Mhz(right)between the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower at its current height of 100ft and the AT&T proposed tower with a height of 200ft. Keep in mind that any coverage deficiencies that may be represented do not take into consideration the coverage obtained by all of the other AT&T Mobility sites in the area. Nearly all potential deficiencies are over open water. _as r:, t!.... .1,.., iiir. , IF Y _ ,... 4/, ''''' 1- . E .2'771 - LdC2tia'+p R'. Ilk, -.. I OrdI1 C F. '' « f. t 1 . 6 .en a i .. a Below is the"Best Case"coverage differences with 850Mhz(left)and 1900Mhz(right)between the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower at a potential height of 200ft and the AT&T Mobility proposed tower with a height of 200ft. Keep in mind that any coverage deficiencies that may be represented do not take into consideration the coverage obtained by all of the other AT&T Mobility sites in the area. Nearly all potential deficiencies are over open water. I --- , lit ir,„, ...' a, - 1 Ott .-te/ :::T ,/" * At kk i , Zile)1ay olrrrt 'it st .A, tam s�1 „r LOG ITEM sb • • Below is only a sample of the € IFei> ¢,galtiek with Lust one of many existin l AT&T sites and the JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower(as-is)with 850Mhz. The color shading in this example represents the r :'i Cowera� atcnot...o-.s o b. Keep in mind that additional AT&T sites are in the area and any coverage deficiencies may be overcome by those other AT&T site locations. Nearly all land/populations areas are served by the combined coverage. � ' ,mil r ` 1 .. ; th autee9e 'r` x1, �0,t,. X i. a. y 1 :X AS.Stacti o r mrsexrts n* F i '4. - 1,. .11)01 1 t€«n an ,akig AT&T -.>.,.” A , e sNe.#iu1 Nw r. ksa�tt a y e a' ' {rcm.JeffQ..9t1.1$ 41.1 '°E 6r ? 1Smft' —o +a �t fH:.. f , g. v .= 'nor ftrit Base w qq,, it,.e_s. r i= Y$1 i y .� yt k t y1, �'" vi ■! 13 \\$..�' 0' "Clutter" considerations for signal coverage from the Coyle Road Tower: These pictures were taken by Greentree Communications (JeffCom911 maintenance contractor) to demonstrate that the existing height of the Coyle Road Tower is at an adequate height for getting above the trees (clutter) and having line-of-site to the intended AT&T coverage objectives. Additional height of the Coyle Road Tower may be available. Below are views from—15°to—135°true north. The Hood Canal Bridge is at far left,Bangor submarine base right-center and Bangor Command and Training left-center of right picture. The full 360 picture set is available. " 5( 5 0 • Below are the point-to-point paths between the Coyle Road Tower/AT&T Proposed Location to the Bangor Lower Sub-Base/Command and Training. What this picture depicts are the effects of"Clutter"and heights relative to the intended target areas. AT&T's location has minimal clearance even at 200ft, where Coyle Road Tower has better clearance even at 100ft. T8 C 'fcas€ad catcr � •" Image La--sat IIL%fi f20t3G cgie ! ) Data 3 3 NOA4 ,S Navy. NSA E.,' Different view of both site locations to Bangor .. �( ...r...-... ...ten a .-.., _ ' h„vim �..N_ .T- .` -a*� .. »- LOG ITEM ----------42--z • • Structural Capability of JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower: JeffCom91 l believes that the Coyle Road Tower is not at full capacity and has sufficient mounting space and structural capability for AT&T. In the unlikely event that the Coyle Road Tower is not sufficient for the additional AT&T loading, the tower can be upgraded or replaced. Northwest Tower Engineering performed a study in November of 2009 and this would need to be updated and performed again with the AT&T antenna configurations. A full copy of the 2009 report is available. Analysis Method A three-dimensional finite element model of the tower was created using RISATower Version 5.370(RISA Technologies 2008).This computer software program calculates and distributes wind and ice loads in the model.It calculates the resulting stresses in all structural members and guy wires,and determines tower deflections and foundation loads.Calculated member stresses were compared to allowable values set forth in the design standard. Analysis Results No overstresses were found: MEMBER OVERSTRESSES Elevation Member Existing Existing&Proposed (Ft) Maximum Stress% Maximum Stress% Leg No Overstress No Overstress 100-60 Diagonal No Overstress No Overstress Horizontal No Overstress No Overstress 60»0 Leg No Overstress No Overstress_ _ Diagonal No Overstress No Overstress The attached tables contain more detailed lists of member stresses. Calculations confirmed the adequacy of the bolts in each leg splice and bracing connection. Welds,plates.and other elements of the connections were assumed to be adequate to develop the full strengths of the members. No foundation information was provided.Therefore NWTE could not verify the adequacy of the foundation at the tower base. North West Tower Engineering 2 www.nw-tower.ect 2210 liawiltRve,tsie204,coney WA 94201.3761 rc7 323.258-4145 ruu2s.tnt-n4 toe Riddle<joe.nddeOCa.^,cadiaPM.cpmo To 3oyor,Gur.ersonngnail.com a. Subject P.E.Cu IeP ngineering Study Bangor Canal-lettCO 911 tower Thanks,Bryon--not sure if ATT will move ahead with this yet,but this SA would seem to indicate that the tower is s ructurally capable. 1 visited the site last Thursday and got photos and will be submitting to ATT this week as a candidate.Do you have a standard collocation lease we could review,andjor an application for collocation? Joe Riddle,Project Manager Cascadia PM 360-904-585B • • • LOG ITEM Pa • • Emergency Generator Availability: JeffCom911 is willing to make available the use of the emergency generator located at the Coyle Road Tower for non-exclusive use for both JeffCom911 and AT&T as part of a sublicense agreement. Any generator capacity issues that may arise can be remedied between the parties. Additional Space at JeffCom911 Coyle Road Tower: During the early discussions, AT&T had requested that JeffCom911 negotiate with Jefferson County for an expansion area, as depicted below, for the AT&T shelter and equipment. This "expansion area" is currently part of the leased ground space in the "Real Property License" between Jefferson County and JeffCom911 for Coyle Road and has always been reserved for AT&T's future use. pDistances not to scale C G 1 Ct p r` Z Z ya APN 6010299 007 t a2 Property Line 4 5.6'... _^Z M ii! o OA ,,- ..,‘ 1 71` Expeostoo 411 ,4 Ilia Additional permitting that may be required at Coyle Road Tower: AT&T would be required to obtain building permits for AT&T's installation. In the event that AT&T needs to increase the height of the current Coyle Road Tower above one hundred feet, AT&T would need to apply through the normal process. JeffCom911 would be support of such applications. GCCSS is available for any clarification or coordination on behalf of JeffCom911 to help resolve this application and provide AT&T a suitable alternative tower location for its needs. Bryon Gunnerson Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC 231 River Run Road Sequim,WA 98382 425-829-3333 Bryon.gunnerson(i`gccss.net LOG ITEM! • • 1 ENTRY AND TESTING AUTHORIZATION Market: Washington Property Owner(s):JeffCom 911 Communications Site Number: BR0266 Property Andress:8640 Coyle Road Quilcene,WA 98376 Site Name: Bangor Canal This Entry and Testing Authorization is granted by the Owner(s) the Property described above,to New Cingular Wireless PCS,LLC,a Delaware limited liability co pany("AT&T"),in connection with AT&T's desire to lease space on the Property for a wireless comm nications facility. Owner hereby grants to AT&T and its authorized agents,a revocable right to enter the Property to perform any reasonable tests that AT&T deems desirable at AT&T's expense to determine the feasibility of constructing and operating a communications facility upon the I Property, including but not limited to: (1)radio frequency testing; (2)environmental audits; (3)boundary surveys; (4)on-site feasibility assessment;(5)utilities ordering,coordination and installation;and/or(6)filing of zoning and other permit applications (the "Access Rights"). For compound and/or tower access, AT&T must be escorted by Owner's representative at a cost of One Hundred Dollars($100.00)per hour. This Entry and Testing Authorization is granted for a period of ' ety(90)days from day execution and may be renewed for an additional ninety(90)days upon written tification to Owner,Owner may revoke the Access Rights at any time by delivering written notice to T&T by certified mail, return receipt requested,to the following address: New Cingular Wireless,PCS,LLC 16221 NE 72,d Way,RTC3 Redmond,WA 98052 Attn:Real Estate Manager The termination notice will be effective three business(3)days after actual receipt by AT&T,provided, however,that AT&T may still enter the Property to remove any equipment it has placed there. By exercising any of the Access Rights,AT&T agrees to:(a)repair any damage to the Property caused by • AT&T's use of the Access Rights;and(b)indemnify,defend and hold Owner harmless from and against any and all claims,damages,losses and expenses arising out of,the negligence or willful misconduct of AT&T or its agents in connection with the Access Rights. THE OWNER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE AT&T HAS MADE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR COMMITMENTS THAT A LEASE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE PROPERTY WILL BE ENTERED INTO IN THE FUTURE. This constitutes the entire understanding between the parties r garding the Access Rights. Any prior understandings,whether oral or written are superseded.This aut rization is governed by the laws of the State in which the Property is located. Signature Janet Silvus,Director,JeffCom 911 Communications Printed Name and Title Date LOG ITEM Pages of • ,inn Lamp rm: Zoe Ann Lamp t: Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:09 AM 'Adam Escalona' bject: RE: BR0266 Bangor Canal (AT&T Mobility Project)- Historic Assessment Adam, Thank you for providing Jefferson County with an opportunity to comment on Cultural or Historic Resources for the proposed cell site at 9395 Coyle Road, Quilcene, WA. Jefferson County has no comment regarding Cultural or Historic Resources at this site. On August 28, 2013 AT&T applied for an Administrative Conditional Use Permit from our office to construct a new wireless communications facility consisting of a 200' self-supporting tower and a 12' x 26' ground equipment shelter within a 50' x 50' fenced compound. Jefferson County's case file number is MLA13- 00116/ZON13-00039. This application remains pending awaiting AT&T's response to a request for additional information. Sincerely, Zoe Ann Lamp, AICP Associate Planner, DRD Lead Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-9406 Fax: 360-379-4473 e-mail: zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW Please note: The Department of Community Development is open to the public 9:00 a.m. —4:30 p.m. Monday- Thursday; Closed Noon- 1:00 p.m.; Closed Fridays. From: Adam Escalona [mailto:AdamEE©adaptengr.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:17 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: BR0266 Bangor Canal (AT&T Mobility Project) - Historic Assessment _5-7 Ms. Lamp, ( / 3/ I left you a voice mail earlier today and I'm following up with this email. I am completing a historic assessment for the following AT&T Mobility cell tower project in unincorporated Jefferson County: 1 BR0266 Bangor Canal 9395 Coyle Road Quilcene, Washington 98376 Parcel No. 601101003 (S10-T26N-R01W, W.M.) The project includes a new 200-foot lattice tower and associated 2,500 square foot compound to be constructed on a 20.38-acre timberland parcel. A cultural resources survey (attached) has been completed and no cultural materials were found. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires a National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Review to assess what effect a project may have on properties that are included on or may be eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. The review includes completing an FCC Form 620 that is forwarded to the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) who will make a final determination on the effect a project will have on historic properties. The Section 106 Review includes inviting the local government to comment on the project and its effect on historic properties. Please let me know if Jefferson County has any comments you would like included in the FCC Form 620 that will be forwarded to DAHP. Smartlink, L.L.C. is completing the zoning-permitting for the project and I'm not sure where they are in that process. Please call or email if you have any questions or need additional information. Thanks Adam E. Escalona Senior Project Manager Adapt Engineering 206-654-7045(office) 206-730-7956(mobile) LOG ITFV4 2 Page-- -0f • I CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: Sylvester L. Lahren, Jr. Ph.D. Title of Proposal: Cultural Resources Survey and Presence/Absence Testing of the AT&T Mobility Project, 9395 Coyle Road, Quilcene, Jefferson County, Washington Date of Report: April 5, 2014 County(ies): Jefferson Section: 10 Township: 30 N Range: 1 W Quad: Quilcene, WA (1953 Revised 1973) Acres: 1.0 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED): Yes Historic Property Export Files to be Approved Online? No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? No TCP(s) found? No Replace a draft? No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? No DAHP Archaeological Site #: • Submission of PDFs is required. • Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet, figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. • Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. JOG ITEM 57 Page----3 of • • . Cultural Resources Survey and Pres nce/Absence Testing of the AT&T Mobility Project, 9395 Coyle oad, Quilcene, Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for Mr. Adam E. Esc lona Senior Project M nager Adapt Enginee ing 615 8th Avenue outh Seattle, WA 98104 Prepared by Sylvester L. Lahren, Jr. Ph.D. Principal Investigator/Author PO Box 974 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-301-5017 slahren • hotmail. om April 5, 2014 LOG 1TEM Page ii of 29 5 cl),"cvot----; ;;5.,—._ • of Contents Introduction 1 Project Description & Location 1 Environmental Setting 6 Geology, Geomorphology and Paleoclimate 6 Contemporary Environment 7 Cultural Setting 9 Prehistory 9 Paleo-Indian 9 Prehistoric Period from 8,000 to 250 Years Ago 9 Ethnography 13 Euro-American History 14 Research Results 15 Research Design 16 Research Goals 16 Washington Statewide Archaeological Predictive Model 16 Practical Expectations 16 Fieldwork 17 Pedestrian Survey 17 Subsurface Presence/Absence Testing 17 Summary 19 References Cited or Consulted 19 Attachment A: Inadvertent Discovery Plan 24 Page iii of 29 5-7 • • FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity map showing Toandos Peninsula and project area. 2 Figure 2. Google earth image of project area. 3 Figure 3. Project area, Quilcene WA, USGS 7.5' Minute Quadrangle. 4 Figure 4. AT&T site plan. 5 Figure 5. Access road showing dense understory obscuring the ground surface. 17 Figure 6. STU1 center of tower footprint, typical showing glacial till. 18 TABLES Table 1. Prehistoric cultural periods on the Olympic Peninsula (after Morgan 1999). 12 Table 2. Cultural resources investigations within 1-mile of the project area. 15 Table 3. Recorded sites, isolates, and historic properties within 1-mile of the project area 16 Table 4. STU Soil Log 18 LOG ITFM Page iv of 29 Parra (0 of ";, I 'troductic AT&T is planning to construct a new cell tower at 9395 Coyle Road, Quilcene, Jefferson County, Washington. They have contracted with Adapt Engineer of Seattle to do the planning and development for this project and Adapt has subcontracted with Sylvester L. Lahren, Jr. Ph.D. to conduct the required cultural resources investigation. According to Mr. Adam E. Escalona (2014:1) (Adapt Engineering, Senior Project Manager): The Tribal notification for the project was completed via the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). It is an internet-based system where project information is entered and tribes are notified via email. The tribes that are notified are based on the county in which the project is located. The tribes themselves have previously entered into the system the counties in which they have an interest. For Jefferson County, the tribes are: 1. Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe 2. Suquamish Tribe 3. Tulalip Tribes of the Tulalip Reservation 4. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 5. Hoh Tribe 6. Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe 7. Quinault Indian Nation 8. Makah Tribe 9. Skokomish Indian Tribe At this point and baring an inadvertent discovery, we are only obligated to further consult on the project with the Port Gamble'S'Klallam Tribe and the Skokomish Indian Tribe as they have replied they have an interest in the proposed undertaking (Escalona 2014:1) Ms. Kris Miller (2013:1) (THPO, Skokomish Tribe) stated that the "Skokomish tribe and their THPO department would like a copy of the Cultural Resource survey for this proposed action. We recommend no work begin until the survey is complete and review by the tribe has taken place." Ms. Marie Hebert (2013:1) (Cultural Resources Director, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe) stated that "I am interested in the project on Coyle Road. Please send me a copy of your final report." On March 19, 2014, Dr. Lahren sent this survey proposal via email to Ms. Gretchen Kaehler, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and Tribal representatives, Kris Miller, THPO, Skokomish Indian Tribe and Marie Hebert, Cultural Resources Director, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe. The survey proposal included an Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) that was prepared for this project (Attachment A). On April 4, 2014 Ms. Miller acknowledged receipt of the proposal and wanted a copy of the final report. It was emailed twice to Ms. Herbert and both times it bounced. Jescription & Location The proposed AT&T cell tower is located at 9395 Coyle Road, Quilcene County, Washington (Figures 1-4). The land form on which the project is situated is commonly known as the Toandos Peninsula. The footprint of the tower is located in Section 10, Township 26 North, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian (Quilcene, WA 1953, Revised 1973 USGS 7.5' minute Page 1 of 29 LOG I TEM S7 ._-7. of . S r quadrangle). Elevation of the project area is approximately 580 to 600 feet (183 m) above mean sea level with the surveyed elevation being 579.63 feet. The footprint of the tower will cover a 50-foot square area (2,500 square feet). There are three proposed ground disturbing activities (GDAs) associated with this project (Figure 3). The depth of the ground disturbance for each of the GDAs was determined by the engineering requirements for that specific development. GDA Description Maximum depth of excavation 1 50 x 50 footprint 24 inches(61 cm)below ground surface 2 Improvement of existing logging roadbed to provide Surface grading of existing roadbed. access to the pad. 3 Installation of underground utility service lines along 36 inches(91 cm)below ground surface to be the existing access logging roadbed. installed in the existing disturbed roadbed. Discovery Bay Freeland Project Area ies< < boy 104 Edn Port Madison SI Dobob P1Isbo l:it. Silverdale Bainbridge tiood Island 5 Bremerton Puget lot z::y?.1i r s:ft cortvrilrar Figure 1.Vicinity map showing Toandos Peninsula and project area. LOG ITEM Page2of29 •5 ) • • Project Area ear meters 1000 fl 300 A Figure 2. Google earth image of project area. III Page 3 of 29 LOG ITEM 7 Page 1111/ • , 515000mE. 516000mE. 517000111E. WGS84 Zone 10T 518000m E. I AP" t 11111111,-7-jort— popr 1 Z 0 ,..,A-, -\‘`.<.\\, - -,•.---'?W -./' A ' i f ‹..?:- .c.. - p„, Fs, ,),,, f f'4 .,".5r': 2 i(' ( ,..I. . i.. \ < 4 . l I N ) • ' :-. '"-sT / c•-:/..i% Q,Sz.:,••:',V ^,,,•''''-"\* (:%---",- It, , 4r—I i - ' , , --s`s- ' \ , - '--- \ --- "..„..... ,4, N,••` . -..- ----' ..,sP\ a --- -. -,.-..„,1,._ 1 ,- ,,..- ,-',;,„ ..4Yi. ---- ,* , \:\\ / " \- 390," , ,1 z Z .., • e 41111 '', . ' . 1 ,..41:,,..1(....z., ‘ V \I ,, . ''..1-... ',`,ff`1.. , r.:..... E ,. ,s '' I 1.,7 1.../k.„„ i‘-'--- 1 A 1 -Th.- - "-' 64. ,-\'* ,I.., :N '4 '\,, .= - , ',. 1 k-.'-' • ' i '' .,-----\\\ '''''----) ..) -...) .. . \. ,s. - ,,,--- -r--.,7-, - /4- _...- 41tb- , ( .... .,.....4(4: w , /, Z_ ',- } 61 •,-.e.e.,,, k ' ' -.010 1 "--,.. \ eVii,,,7 .,,,,.."-"N„. •,..- i .',' .9,i' • '' ' ,, ,`,.,;".•;:t.Wif,„ ,',' _.'....\„111/A11\ ,:. ■•t\I '',\„\ s■„, - • ir -4 -',.).• -4 i„.—.,--,.-.-„- 4 iA Project Area -(4.----- C■1`,..',.; i i ., I- - - ,. ■-e:.---- ---.-7....„ ,-/ , z z - „/,;,7,--', , -', .C-s-- ‘), , 7'\ ' ---- ' • ),) 'Iv,'- - - //, 4,...:',-,,t, ,,./.%, -r„,------ i • 4 --",.. !..;•:. . I :t.,.,,,, .E E Afi ' , ' ' :--- ' s\°' /- / i . '' I , .(.' ' \\,,-.."--,,--"'s-/' 1 e ' Li _. - . -.1. .f:' 3 6 (7:,..2,ify r ,, : : ,,',' T/' . 1 , -7 ------ .-7... -, -a.7.., '- --,, -t •,,,; cr, cr, ,..4.- ' /„, „,.- .,..•„\ s\ ,... •-;••':-. ":-7.----,,,.- ...,,!;,. -_,Act, : lilt . ' / -•- ,y, It si ,,, ,-...,„? \ :--- -./- „,....: i... , ,..„„ Z.. ,/ , ' / I - -- ,,,..._:-..,4,., __, , ,. . ...-dt , ., ,..--• `z ---- , I' -.509 ' \--, I q'C'''''‘; '''Mk;,N*-\-\,:. 2' lirkkhicl ,,' ' • , .!.c, ,, \.,s' -,11 - _ . ,%.,4,1/4....8,:,,,,‘__,, , „.,.../(k• / z Z .1 . ' V_? & ,,::- —g - E r ,r, / ~ ', fl_ ) \ ,..-.......77) , , . 0 , ' '--- - :7,1, , * I 1 , i r ' ' \,...,-,,, 1 - ''''.-...'' '''''”" '‘4"..r:s:" ' CO eh /4 i 9 I i , '\i'.. , s'tZ, , ( 5?0 '-- '•!'''...‘ AL., ,,,,,, . ,.., 09 ,, 1,,,, ,..,„ , ,,,,, / , - . .. _ ,..t.........,_/___ - -- -) t ------p7 „ / ,..4 ,, ,,.. , ../'''',7.): \ , 15 19., k / a, /) ,,,„. 4.4.*:11, ,21/ .51 -4 :, """/ ''''' 4,1,f:( t4•...-4* •, l/ 0,- "—\--,,-- (: .(;) '" ',', : ", V Ili 11%.‘, 4 .` : - . .drjip *"‘"4:aV11\v.:*':'• z z 0,-- CM r *qr. ./ $ -''',ANIrl'"''' '‘VP*'''''''''''-'s. 7v-,.,-e-s)-- :.Y. co f ,-, ..< ....../ A Map created with T',#)PiNi.;i, ©2010-National Geographic ..„„woo, 7 , , Alr ,...,... 5150'J:mE. 516000mE. 51700orn E. WGS84 Zone 10T 51800orn E. TN* MN NATIONAL 0.0 0.5 1.0 mies 161/20 . ) . - , - ,, • ' , ' GEOGRAPHIC 0.0 ,-, • • • 03 1.0 1.5 km 03/08/14 Figure 3. Project area, Quilcene WA, USGS 7.5' Minute Quadrangle. Page 4 of 29 LOG ITEM 51 4-)aci;TP of....31— , ,4 r , • 0 1 ---- .• . ),....,". 41-4.101 o..". .p. 1. tr..ewo .....1:1.0' .. ..I I ... N. ;—.44111/APIP ....- y. gh ral:\ ...S.: , P. f I , •t:...3 LIZ...—.1.—.K.M I 1 • I ..w.n:....x....c. -.... -or ) Arrilem ; - 1 i i A swm N'O , • :. i ,..• f i • "-•,--:,.,-.=,' ! ,.1/4.---7,., Figure 4.AT&T site plan. Page 5 of 29 ...OG ITEM S". 7 If of az • . Environmental Setting The project is located on the Toandos Peninsula (Figure 1). It forms the southeastern extent of the Olympic Peninsula and the south end of the Quimper Peninsula which is named after the Peruvian-born Spanish explorer Manuel Quimper who charted the north and south coasts of the Strait of Juan de Fuca in 1790. The Quimper Peninsula is defined by Discovery Bay to the west, the Strait of Juan de Fuca to the north, and Port Townsend Bay to the east. The Quimper Peninsula forms the westernmost boundary of Admiralty Inlet and has become a convenient means of referring collectively to Port Townsend and the surrounding communities. Geology, Geomorphology and Paleoclimate The Toandos and Quimper peninsulas lie within the Puget Trough Physiographic Province (Fenneman 1931, Franklin and Dyrness 1973:16-17). The main feature of the region is Puget Sound, which covers about 2,600 square kilometers and is as deep as 280 meters from the surface (Burns 1985:57). Another major feature is Mt. Olympus; it is the tallest mountain on the Olympic Peninsula and rises to 7,954 feet above sea level (McKee 1972:154). Puget Trough is dominated by late Quaternary glacial and alluvial sediments and the Olympic Peninsula is dominated by Tertiary and early Quaternary marine and volcanic sediments (Geological Map of Washington 1961). About 30 million years ago, during the Oligocene, sediments on the western edge of the North American continental plate began to override the subducting Pacific plate. Plate tectonics in this region resulted in the creation of the Olympic Mountains through thrust faulting. In the last Pleistocene ice age, Puget Sound was covered by a thick ice sheet. The regional topography was significantly influenced by the Puget lobe of the Cordilleran ice cap, which pushed into the region from the north during a series of glaciations. In the last interval, (the Fraser Glaciation), the Puget Lobe covered Puget Sound with up to 4060 feet (1250 m) of ice (Thorson 1980). It blocked north-flowing streams and created a system of proglacial lakes fed by ice-marginal and sub-glacial meltwater systems. About 15,000 years ago, the Puget Lobe began a northward retreat toward Port Townsend, later retreating from what is now the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Remains of the glacial outwash plain, glacial moraines, kettle ponds, and old river terraces are visible today and represent ground surfaces as old as 11,000 to 15,000 years. Today's landscape consists of low, gently rolling hills cut by numerous streams. In the Puget Sound, rivers and streams drain into small coves and inlets of tidewater as well as into larger bays. When the glaciers retreated, sea levels rose. Removal of heavy ice sheets resulted in isostatic rebound (Thorson 1980, 1981). In southern and central Puget Sound, the sea level was within several meters of the modern sea level by about 5000 years BP and within one meter of modern levels by about 1000 years BP (Eronen, et al. 1987). Atwater and Moore (1992), Bucknam, et al. (1992), and Nelson, et al. (2002) have reported that late-Holocene subduction-thrust earthquakes and related uplift, subsidence, and deformation have been observed in several locations in the Puget Lowland. According to Sherrod, et al. (2003:4, Figure 5 and 2004) quakes along the Tacoma Fault changed the elevation and shorelines in the vicinity. The Quimper/Toandos peninsulas share a complex geological history with the greater Olympic Peninsula. Port Townsend, for example, lies above layers of largely Eocene sedimentary bedrock that was subsequently modified by repeated glaciations. Glacial movement modified the bedrock and by about 13,000 years ago, the receding ice had deposited gravel, Page 6 of 29 LOG ITEM iVof '37 • • unconsolidated clay, silt, and sand, and formed meltwater channels and lowlands (Thorson 1980). Coastal beach is found on 1 to 5% slopes and the depth to the water table ranges from 0 to 72 inches; this soil type frequently floods. HuD soil is found on terraces with glacial outwash as the parent material. A typical soil profile for HuD is 0 to 2 inches: Gravelly loamy sand; 2 to 10 inches: Gravelly loamy sand; 10 to 26 inches: Gravelly loamy sand; and, 26 to 60 inches: Gravelly loamy sand. (http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvev.aspx Climate change, landform isostatic rebound, and a general rise in sea levels from melting glaciers occurred before the stabilization of an essentially modern Puget Lowland maritime climate and vegetation around 4,500 years ago (Schumacher 2001). After the glacial ice retreated, pioneering plant species colonized the newly deglaciated landscape, including lodgepole pine, bracken fern, and red alder. A few centuries later, Douglas-fir was present in the vegetative mix (Barnosky et al. 1987). The warming and drying trend continued between 10,500 and 7,500 years before present (B.R.). This allowed the expansion of grasses, oak, and hazel and the persistence of Douglas-fir. After about 7,000 years B.P., cedar and hemlock increased relative to other trees and became dominant by about 5,000 years B.P. This marked the beginning of the modern climate regime of western Washington; e.g., cool, moist conditions and closed-climax forests (Tsukada et al. 1981; Whitlock 1992). In spite of smaller-scale climatic fluctuations (warming and cooling), no additional significant changes in vegetation were recorded until the extensive land clearing conducted by Euro-Americans in the 19th century (Leopold et al. 1982). Several natural geomorphologic processes, either singly or working in tandem, may have obscured archaeological deposits that might be present in the project area. These processes, such sea level adjustment, erosion and slope failures, earthquake subsidence, and tsunami deposits, may have contributed to site burial or submersion below present sea level. Changes in regional climate affected vegetation patterns and the density and distribution of terrestrial fauna. Changes in the kinds and locations of vegetation and terrestrial mammals, in turn, affected the plant gathering and hunting patterns of people living in the Puget Sound. Contemporary Environment Prior to the major land-use changes imposed on the Toandos/Quimper peninsulas landscape and ecosystem that resulted from European settlement, the terrestrial uplands were dominated by a floral community called the Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock) Zone (Franklin and Dyrness 1973; Henderson, et al. 1989). Plant species distribution in this zone is affected by moisture, elevation, soil, and frequency of fire. In wetter environmental zones, this floral association occupies lowland areas up to about 1000 feet but in drier zones, it can occur up to 4000 feet in elevation (Henderson, et al. 1989:279). Common trees include western hemlock, Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), and western red cedar (Thuja plicata). Logging and other disturbance has changed the character of this floral association. In many places not otherwise urbanized, stands of second growth (and even third growth) Douglas fir, western red cedar, and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) dominate the landscape with some Pacific madrona (Arbutus menziesii), big leaf maple (Acer macrophylla), and red alder (Alnus rubra) present as well. Red alder is one of the most abundant trees on recently disturbed sites. Mature forests have lush understories with dense growths of shrubs, herbs, ferns, and cryptograms. Page 7 of 29 'ac1e. /3 �... • Depending on location and the degree of human disturbance and fire suppression, understory species may include swordfern (Polystichum munitum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa), Pacific Rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum), evergreen huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), and the now ubiquitous Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Plants important to Native Americans included western red cedar, camas (Camassia quamash), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), salal, and huckleberries. All of these plants are present on the Olympic Peninsula and in places on the Quimper Peninsula (Henderson, et al. 1989:5-6). A detailed study of indigenous plants used by native peoples of western Washington has been presented by Gunther(1992). The peninsulas, at least in prehistoric times, was home to a variety of economically important land and sea mammals including deer (Odocoileus hemionus), wapiti (Cervus elaphus), elk (Cervus canadensis), bear(Ursus americanus), beaver (Castor canadensis), coyote (Canis latrans), river otters (Lutra canadensis), harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), and whales among others. In addition, local estuaries and sandy beaches were undoubtedly attractive habitats for birds of the Anatidae family (ducks, geese, and swans) and provided habitat for edible molluscs and shellfish such as the presently abundant razor clam (Siliqua patula). Important bivalve molluscs found in channel habitats of northwest coast estuaries include butter clam (Saxidomus giganteus), gaper clams or horseclams (Tresus capax; T. nuttallil), piddock clam (Zirfaea pilsbryi), geoduck clam (Panopea generosa), cockle (Clinocardium nuttallii), native littleneck (Protothaca staminea), macoma clams (bentnose, Baltic, and macoma) (Macoma spp.) and mussel (Mytilus edulis). Oysters (Ostrea lurida, Pododesmus macroschisma) and barnacles (Balanus cariosus) may also have been important resources to prehistoric peoples. Archaeological sites that might be located in the project area might also provide evidence for the well-known pattern of native exploitation of anadromous fish that migrated up rivers and streams, such as the Chehalis River. It is reasonable to assume that one or more of the following species were economically important to the prehistoric population: chinook or king salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha), silver or coho salmon (0. kisutch), pink or humpback salmon (0. gorbuscha), chum or dog salmon (0. keta), sockeye salmon (0. nerka), cod (Ophiodon elongatus and Gadidae sp.), perch (Eubiotociadae sp.), flounder (Pleuronectidae sp.), trout (cutthroat- Salmo clarkii; steelhead - S. gairdneri; and Dolly Varden - Salvinus malma), skate (Raja stellata), smelt (Osmeridae sp.), herring (Clupea pallasi), halibut (Pleuronectidae sp.), octopus (Octopus dofleini), and sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). Edible crabs (Cancer magister and C. productus) might have been important as well. The tribes of the northern Olympic Peninsula, including the Hoh, Quileute, Makah, Elwha Klallam, and Jamestown S'Klallam, maintain a close cultural and economic relationship with the nearshore environment (Shaffer 2004:43). Tribal nearshore marine resources are used for food, basketry, tools, regalia and jewelry. Tribal use extended from lower rivers and riparian zones to subtidal areas. Lower rivers are important locations for smelt and salmon harvesting and cedar and spruce root harvesting. Intertidal areas provide sources of dune vegetation, beach logs, numerous species of seaweeds, eelgrass and seagrass (attached and drift), and numerous shellfish, including bivalves, crab, snails, chitons, urchins, barnacles, and octopus. Subtidal resources mentioned include numerous fish species and their eggs, including salmon, lingcod, smelt, herring, rockfish, halibut and other flat fish; numerous shellfish, including crab, octopus, and snails (Shaffer 2004:44). Page 8 of 29 LOG ITEM S� • • Cultural Setting This section provides an overview of the known archaeological and ethnographic use of the Toandos Peninsula, including a brief synthesis of changes affecting Native American land use over approximately the past 11,000 years. A summary of previous archaeological site investigations is provided to illustrate the distribution and variety of known site types within the project region. Prehistory The first modern archaeology in the Pacific Northwest began with the pioneering work of Franz Boas and Harlan Smith (Blukis Onat 1987:24) and Albert Reagan on the Olympic Peninsula (Bergland 1983:14). In western Washington, coastal sites have been more extensively explored than inland sites in both the Olympic Peninsula and Puget Sound (Bergland 1983:14, Blukis Onat 1987:30, and Wessen 1987:22). Indian Island and two other Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station properties were subject to an archaeological assessment by BOAS, Inc. (Hess, Blukis Onat, and Stump 1990). They reviewed the available Resource Protection Planning Process (RP3) documents pertinent to their investigation areas. Hess, Blukis Onat and Stump (1990:7-13) relied upon five pertinent study units: Paleo-Indian, Olympic Peninsula, Southern Puget Sound, Northern Puget Sound, and Western Washington Protohistoric study units. Paleo-Indian The Early Paleo-Indian subperiod includes sites dating from the initial occupation of Washington to 11,000 years ago. These sites are found in association with early landforms such as former river terraces (Blukis Onat 1987:17). The Manis Site (45CA218) is located in the northern portion of the Olympic Peninsula and contains evidence of the butchering of up to two mastodons. Bison bones and a flaked cobble spall were found as well (Gustafson, et al. 1979:163) along with a bone or antler point embedded in a mastodon rib (Gustafson, et al. 1979:158). The Late Paleo-Indian subperiod is better known. Many sites of this subperiod are placed into the Olcott Complex; typical artifacts include leaf-shaped basalt projectile points and knives, and heavy cobble (chopper) tools (Blukis Onat 1987:18). Olcott Complex sites have been found on the Olympic Peninsula (Rice 1985:6). Large game animals such as deer and elk made up the majority of the subsistence base and at a few sites; there is evidence of the use of marine and littoral resources (Bergland 1983:28). At the Quilcene site (45JE14) on the Olympic Peninsula, a larger variety of artifact types were found in comparison to typical Olcott Complex sites. Rice (1985:10) suggests it was an occupation site. The Manis site also includes an Olcott- like component (Gustafson, et al. 1979:163) but its stratigraphic location above Mazama ash suggests it is less than 600 years old (and would not be included in the Paleo-Indian study unit). Prehistoric Period from 8,000 to 250 Years Aar As discussed by Hess, Blukis Onat and Stump (1990:10), cultural sequences or chronologies that cover western Washington had been proposed by Kidd (1964), Blukis Onat (1987), Wessen (1985), and Bergland (1983). At least as of 1990, none of these chronologies had become widely accepted and a clear understanding of western Washington cultural chronology did not yet exist (Wessen 1985:16). Blukis Onat (1980, 1987) presented a three-part cultural chronology based on changes in resource management practices. Page 9 of 29 LOG ITEM � 7 K' " , C of 3/ • • General Resource Development Clovis, Olcott, and other early materials are placed in the Generalized Resource Development period lasting from 13,000 to 6,000 years ago. Pleistocene megafauna are present in the early stage; the development of Holocene faunal resources characterizes the late stage. As a result of erosion and deposition produced by marine and riverine shoreline changes, evidence for this period is sparse throughout the Puget Trough. Many sites are found on former river terraces more than 100 feet above current sea levels. Many Olcott type sites have been found in the Fraser and Nooksack River drainages to the northeast and the Snohomish drainage to the southeast of the Quimper Peninsula. Olcott sites are common in the lower reaches of the rivers on former terraces and glacial outwash uplands. Artifacts consist of projectile points and knives (mostly basalt) and pebble and heavy spall tools. These sites are shallow and lie just above glacial debris. A few of the sites contain features (hearths, charcoal lenses, burned sand and earth, stake molds) and are overlain by shell middens. These sites probably represent food procurement and processing camps (Hess, Blukis Onat and Stump 1990:10-11). Specialized Resource Development The Specialized Resource Development period lasted from 6,000 to 2,500 years ago. Coastal sites are characterized by the following traits: numerous ground stone implement, basalt projectile points, microblades and cores (obsidian), large ground stone projectile points and knives and adzes (and celts), bone and antler tools, ground shell implements with associated whetstones and other grinding stones, and toggling harpoons. Some sites may have been villages with permanent structures but many were temporary food procurement camps. Marine resources were used as well as terrestrial and littoral resources. Shell middens appear after about 4,000 years ago. Inland sites are characterized by the following traits: scarce bone implements, ground stone assemblages comparable to those at coastal sites, abundant chipped stone tools of various styles and raw materials (many with similarities Columbia Basin artifacts). As of 1983, only two sites on the Olympic Peninsula were thought to date to the early or middle portion of this time period but their dating was less than certain (Bergland 1983:31-32). A site from the later portion of this time period is the Hoko site (45CA213); it dates between 2,700 and 2,200 years ago and yielded large numbers of normally perishable artifacts due to its permanent inundation. Compared to earlier, less well preserved sites, the Hoko site demonstrated that by the end of this period, prehistoric peoples were emphasizing maritime resources in comparison to terrestrial resources and artifact assemblages had fewer stone tools and more wood and bone tools (Croes and Blinman 1980). Specialized Resource Management The Specialized Resource Management period began around 2,500 years ago and continued until the beginning of the historic period. Coastal sites show full scale development of maritime oriented cultures known from the ethnographic period while inland sites reflect fully developed regimes of land mammal hunting and upriver fishing in the lower Cascade foothills. A large number of sites are dated to this time period. The most important site from this period on the Olympic Peninsula is the Ozette Site (45CA24) at Cape Alava. Similar to the Hoko Site, Ozette was permanently waterlogged since it was destroyed by a mudslide; organic items were well preserved. Ozette deposits date back from the early historic period to about 2,000 years ago. By the early historic period, this Makah village was occupied year round supported by a maritime-focused subsistence base. The tool assemblage is dominated by bone and wood implements (Bergland 1983:44-47). At Ozette, the prehistoric and historic economy was oriented towards marine resources and sea mammals Page 10 of 29 _OG IT M 5 'l of 31 • I were the focus of procurement activities. Northern fur seals provided a major part of the Ozette diet and sea otters (Enhydra lutris), harbor seals, and sea lions (Eumetopias jubata or Zalophus californianus) were also found around offshore rocks and kelp beds. Whales, particularly California grays (Eschrichtius gibbosus) and humpbacks (Megaptera novaengliae) were harpooned from large canoes in the spring and early summer. Rockfish (Sebastes spp.) and lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus), herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) and halibut (Hippoglossus for the Ozette inhabitants as were seasonal runs of stenolpis) were major food resources o t e p ) 1 several salmonids (Samuels 1991:8-9). Migrating ducks and geese and sea and shore birds provided food, feathers and bones for tool making. Extensive shellfish beds found along beaches provided mussels at low tide and dozens of other edible species of bivalves, chitons, crabs and octopi. Supplementing maritime resources were forest-dwelling land mammals and a wealth of vegetal foods (Samuels 1991:11). To the east of the Toandos/Quimper peninsulas, across the Sound and just south of downtown Seattle, is the Duwamish No. 1 Site (45KI23). It is the best example of a shell midden site dating to this time period. The site was occupied between 1,300 years ago and the start of the historic period. Wood and fiber artifacts were not common at this site however bone, antler and stone artifacts were abundant. Large quantities of shell and implements used to hunt marine mammals, evidences a similar maritime focus as at the Ozette Site. Some terrestrial hunting is indicated by recovery of deer and elk bones and chipped stone projectile points. Unless the year round occupation at Ozette, the Duwamish No. 1 site was probably occupied during the late fall, winter, and early spring (Campbell 1981:465-472; URS Corp 1987). The most recent synthesis of prehistoric cultural chronology for the Olympic Peninsula was compiled by Morgan (1999) in connection with the SR 101 Sequim Bypass Archaeological Project (Table 1). This scheme is gaining acceptance and is presented below as the cultural chronology most suited the interpretation of prehistory on the Toandos/Quimper peninsulas. LOG ITEM Page 11 of 29 a � Page 17 of 3( S • , Table 1. Prehistoric cultural periods on the Olympic Peninsula (after Morgan 1999). Fable 1. Prehistoric cultural yeriods on the Olympic Peninsula(after Morgan 1999) Period or Phase Dates i years Representative Iypiccal Subsistence Culture BP!, Site Iypes artifacts features Name Clovis-, Jfegafauna l.-in Cobble flake and Pleistocene and butchery sites bone'ander tusk tools megafatma Early Upland and river Leaf-shaped and cobble Large mammals Prehistoric Old --12000-6000 terrace sites tools,scrapers and and some fish Period C;ordilleran without choppers}of coarse- exploitation and Olcoa architectural grained and basalt (5000- structures.food r materials,some bone 9DCO)) processing sites , and antler tools Seasonal , lncreas nely complex Hunter-fisher- campsites with stone tools.contacting gatherers,fish,sea Middle first appearance of stem and triangular mammals,large Prehistoric Olcott 5CC0.3)C4 architecune and projectile points. terrestrial Period hearths-marine grounds-tone tools, mammals(elk and resource wood car{ines.bone deer)and shellfish processing sires , and antler tools Shell midden and Wood and soft stone Fish.shellfish. coastal carvings,bone and terrestrial and sea occupations with antler tools. mammals.some house structures groundstone,composite specialization Locarno (rectangular and fichine tools,fire and,or social Beach circular)and modified rock, stratification hearths.some fish abundance of finely possible Early storage facilities. worked stone tools Maritime 3CO3-10C4 clay and rock- Period lined pits-flexed burials.middens Larne house Abundance of stemmed Fish, shellfish, structures and projectile points. terrestrial Marpole hearths with Lives,and other stone mammals with Phase S i abundant food tools,zootnorphic and artifacts indicative 1 storage facilities, anthropomorphic stone of specializations flexed burials, sculptures,stone and and social middens, shell beads.pendants stratification Prehistoric 1630- Permanent Bone and antler tools, tiiarine:aruatic Northwest ethnohistoric settlement composite fishing fools, resources,large Coast occupations with basketry and art of mammals. Pattern longhouse wood and stone.few increased structures,storage stone tools specialization and structures,burials, social stratification shell middens LOG ITEM li <1 Page 12 of 29 ya of� 1 I Ethnography According to Sutt les and Lane (1990:485) the title Southern Coast Salish refers to two Coast Salish Languages, the Lushootseed and Twana. The Lushootseed consisted of two groups of dialects, the Northern and Southern. Suttles and Lane's (1990:486) Figure 1 shows the location of the location of the Toandos Peninsula as fall within the general territory of the Twana. At the top of the peninsula on page 486 they specifically identify the "Dabob" as occupying this area and on page 487 they list it under the Twana heading as "41. Dabob." This article provides a general ethnographic description of these cultural groups. In 2008 Hartman (2008:4-5) conducted a cultural resources survey at the extreme south end of the Toandos Peninsula. He states: The project area for the O'Dell and Tram Dock[at the extreme south end of the Toandos Peninsula]lies within the region traditionally used by S'Klallam, Suquamish, and Tuwaduq people (Castile 1985; Gunther 1927; Snyder 1968:130;Spier 1936:32;Suttles 1990). These groups practiced a seasonal subsistence economy that included hunting,fishing, and plant food horticulture. The Tuwaduq are now known as the Skokomish Tribe, and locally, the S'Klallam are represented by the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe(Hartman 2008:4). The Tuwaduq occupied lands on both sides of Hood Canal(Gibbs in Spier 1936:32), including the shores and drainages of Hood Canal,from Port Ludlow in the north to the Skokomish River drainage in the south (Elmendorf and Kroeber 1992). The Tuwaduq followed a seasonal round, acquiring food resources in small work groups intensively in the spring, summer, and autumn, and spending winters in villages on protected bays near mouths of streams. There were nine Tuwaduq winter villages located on the shoreline of Hood Canal, a settlement and summer camp areas in the vicinity of Seabeck(Elmendorf and Kroeber 1992:54). The Tuwaduq and Suquamish engaged in trade,facilitated by a trail linking Hood Canal to the head of Dyes Inlet and Manette(Elmendorf and Kroeber 1992:292-293)(Hartman 2008:4). The Suquamish Tribe occupied lands between present-day Gig Harbor, and Bainbridge and Whidbey Islands prior to the implementation of the Point Elliott Treaty in 1855(Spier 1936;Suttles and Lane 1990). Pre-contact Suquamish settlements were often located on major waterways, and heads of bays or inlets. In the winter, the Suquamish lived at large permanent village settlements and they spent the summer hunting,fishing, and gathering at specialized, temporary camps.An abundance of plant and animal resources was available in estuarine and marine environments in the region.A combination offish, shellfish, marine mammals, waterfowl, game, roots, and berries served as a rich, diverse, and relatively reliable resource base (Ruby and Brown 1992:226;Suttles and Lane 1990:489(Hartman 2008:4). The S'Klallam and neighboring tribes utilized the resources afforded by the foothills and higher slopes of the Olympic Mountains, coastal resources of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and the interspersed open prairie grasslands, streams, and wetlands for fishing, hunting, and gathering activities(Suttles 1990:456). The S'Klallam spent winters in villages, which were primarily at relatively sheltered locations on bays off of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Villages were composed of vertical planked, gable-roofed houses. The rest of the year was spent gathering resources throughout the eastern Olympic Peninsula, Hood Canal, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. When away from the winter village,people lived in rectangular houses composed of a wooden frame covered by woven rush or grass mats(Gunther 1927)(Hartman 2008:4-5). In 2010 Grant and Kretser(2010:4-5) conducted a cultural resources survey at Zelatched Point located on the west side of the Toandos Peninsula. He states: The APE is within the traditional territory of the Twana people(Elmendorf 1992:20-21; Spier 1936:32). The Twana had winter villages on both sides of Hood Canal, including the Quilcene and Dabob groups that lived near the waters of Dabob Bay. The Twana, whose descendants now comprise the Skokomish Tribe, assigned place names to four shoreline areas Page 13 of 29 (9 3/ • designated for continued activities and access:JNote:confidential locations deleted by S.Lahrenl. The Twana frequented Dabob Bay and the surrounding beaches for seasonal salmon fishing and clam digging(James 1993:60-64)(Grant and Kretser 2010:4) The neighboring Chemakum, Klallam, and Suquamish people also used Hood Canal for summer fishing and gathering(Elmendorf 1992:287; Gunther 1927:195; Lane 1974:3-4, 1975:21, 1981:5). Descendants of the Klallam are currently members of the Port Gamble S'Klallam, Jamestown S'Klallam, and Lower Elwha Klallam Tribes. The Suquamish are members of the contemporary Suquamish Tribe(Grant and Kretser 2010:4-5). Euro-American History The earliest historical accounts of the northeastern Olympic Peninsula are from Spanish and English explorers. Manuel Quimper explored the Strait of Juan de Fuca and claimed the Washington coastline for Spain in 1790. Admiralty Inlet and Puget Sound was explored and mapped by Captain George Vancouver in 1792 (Meany 1915; Morgan 1999; Vancouver et al. 1798). In 1841, the U.S. Exploring Expedition led by Charles Wilkes charted what was then called the Oregon Territory, which was jointly occupied by the United States and Britain (and the British Hudson Bay Company). Within just a few years of the Wilkes expedition, more Americans began to settle in Washington Territory. The enactment of the Oregon Donation Land Act in 1850, which offered 320 acre parcels to those who would reside and cultivate the land for four consecutive years, spurred American settlement. Native American populations began to decline due to a combination of smallpox epidemics and conflicts with neighboring groups (Elmendorf 1990). When white settlers came to Discovery Bay in 1853 (Keeting 1976), many native villages had been abandoned due to disease (Boyd 1990). In addition to settlers, the U.S. military built up a presence in the area. In 1866 the government converted Diamond Point along with Protection Island and Cape George to a military reservation until 1870. In 1892, the government reacquired Diamond Point and continued its use until 1936 (Taylor 1976). Fort Townsend was built in 1856 and remained in use until partly destroyed by fire in 1894 (Hunt 1970). In addition to lumber, fishing was an important element of the local economy. Commercial exploitation of fish began as early as 1825 with the efforts of the HBC; shellfish were commercially used starting around 1850 (Tollefson 1974:3-4). The potential for farming drew homesteaders to the Port Townsend-Indian Island area between 1865 and 1870 (Russell and Bean 1978:4). These early settlers farmed mainly for their own subsistence but due to the difficult conditions associated with farming in areas that were formerly forest-covered, some turned to dairying and raising livestock as their primary means of support (Lindeman and Williams 1985:4). With the advent of transcontinental railroad in the 1880s and 1890s, larger markets were made available to farmers. Commercial production of poultry and eggs became important industries for farmers in the vicinity (Lindeman and Williams 1985:4). In the late 1880s, a railroad was constructed as part of the Port Townsend and Southern Railroad from Port Townsend south to Quilcene (Camfield 2000:292). This line was later connected to the rail line between Port Angeles and Port Townsend (Keeting 1976:68). Railroads connected the previously isolated communities with Seattle and other larger cities. LOG ITEM Page 14 of 294' , , , Of 31 • According to Grant and Kretser (2010:5): The first non-natives to inhabit the Zelatched Point[located on the south east side of Toandos Peninsula] area worked in logging camps and sawmills. The waters of Hood Canal were used to transport lumber to outside markets. Families arrived by boat to establish farms and ranches on cut-over timberlands. Oyster farms were established on Quilcene Bay in the 1930s and later became a well known industry in the project area(Jefferson County Historical Society 1966:163-167). The Navy built the Whitney Point land-based facility in the mid-1950s. The Zelatched Point land-based facility was built in the mid-1960s by the Navy to replace the Whitney Point land-based facility(Grant and Kretser 2010:5). Research Results Prior to fieldwork, a Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISSARD) record search was conducted at the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) website to determine if recorded prehistoric or historic archaeological sites might be present within 1-mile (1.6-km) of the project area. The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) was reviewed to determine if the proposed project area contains any listed sites. No resources were located within the 1-mile search area (Table 2). 3urces investi•ations within 1-mile of"le •ro'ect area. No.HP Project Name Reference Location Type No reports within the 1-mile search area. None Below are some other reports located on the peninsula. A Cultural Resources Survey of the Washington Department of 1342934 Transportation's Proposed Ferry Emerson 2001 North end of Toandos Survey Terminal Sites, South Point and Port Peninsula Gamble, Jefferson and Kitsap Counties, Washington Cultural Resources Assessment for the South end of Toandos 1352198 O'Dell Dock and Tram Project in Coyle, Hartmann 2008 Peninsula Survey Jefferson County,Washington Historic Properties Assessment for Grant& Kretser South end of Toandos 104916 Zelatched Point Jefferson County, 2010 Peninsula Survey Washington No archaeological sites or historic properties have been recorded within a 1-mile radius of the proposed project area (Table 3). Page 15 of 29 LOG ITEM III Table 3. Recorded sites, isolates, and historic ro erties within 1-mile of the ro'ect area. None Historic Property Inventory Reports None Research Design Research Goals The primary goal of the investigation of the AT&T tower pad was to identify and record any cultural resources that may be present. Cultural resources on the pad might include prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, elements of the historic built environment (buildings and structures), and cultural resources of importance to Native Americans with ties to the project area. Specific objectives of this investigation included: 1) identification and documentation of all cultural resources in the project area that may be affected by the proposed project, 2) assessment of the nature and magnitude of project effects on any identified and documented cultural resources, and 3) establishment of avoidance measures, if possible. The cultural resources survey and presence/absence subsurface testing were primarily descriptive in nature; the articulation of study findings within the regional cultural frameworks described earlier will not be a major focus of this investigation. The results of this limited survey and presence/absence testing did not yield information that could be used to test any models of prehistoric settlement and subsistence patterns. Washington Statewide Archaeological Predictive Model The Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP) statewide predictive model uses environmental data about the locations of archaeological sites to identify other locations where archaeological sites are more likely to occur. The model correlates the locations of archaeological site to environmental data "to determine the probability that, under a particular set of environmental conditions, another location would be expected to contain an archaeological site (Kauhi and Markert 2009:2-3)." Environmental data categories included in the model are elevation, slope, aspect, distance to water, geology, soils, and landforms. The model classifies the property location as a combination of"Survey Highly Advised: High Risk" and "Survey Highly Advised: Very High Risk" (DAHP 2013). Practical Expectations The project area vicinity has a long history of Native American, homestead, and maritime uses. It was anticipated that the project area could potentially contain prehistoric sites, early historic Native American activity, and nineteenth century Euro-American activity. 1 Page 16 of 29 92 3 / • 0 Fieldwork Pedestrian Survey The pedestrian survey was hampered by a dense understory which obscured 100 percent of the lot surface area and both sides of existing logging road (Figure 5). The access road survey was conducted by walking tightly spaced zigzag transects, less than 1 m (3.3 feet) apart down the centerline of the road bed. Both sides of the access road were examined for artifacts, features, or other evidence of cultural occupation. The cell tower footprint was also covered with a dense understory similar to that shown in Figure 5 below. Salal and duff covered 100 percent of the ground surface of the footprint. No cultural resources were observed during either of these surveys. /41.1411 - - .. ., ' '‘ ,44p.,........ ,,,......,,,,4. , .7.p,- I-;.;t. ', i,;i 'm '7,,t ''14 ' f,,k*'.( 4 A .:,,,, . vo,,„ • , ''' r' 6 y.s � v ,fi. �y ro�`tii ::::,,::v":11;:;',•:::':...: � " ,1 ^ � ±ue*.. ° t r .` 1 i f� rte`: x�. frz. { �k . � y t11t 1. e 4, i ‘1. - ) ',it, -loitti" ';.0.:;7-. - '1'. , ., , t\,,Pr"' ■ '4 4:‘ (1:141t It,' ..:," ..., . .. . \\\ .. ‘ \ , ,. ., '* . 'r .. fir s''.. Figure 5.Access road showing dense understory obscuring the ground surface. Subsurface Presence/Absence Testing The pedestrian survey was augmented by presence/absence shovel testing (STU). Given the extensive ground cover, it was decided to place shovel probes at each staked corner of the cell tower footprint and one in the center of the pad. All five of these locations had been previously staked and, with some difficulty, they were relocated. The depositional structure exposed in each of the five STUs is set forth in Table 4. Due to the small amount of sediment that was removed during each partial shovel probe it was not necessary to use a screen. Each STU was back-filled after examination. A utility locate was conducted prior to testing (ticket# 14049048). Page 17of29 ;_ LINA s7 -,,-,-- LT-67f73,7 • 0 , , The five STUs' depositional structure described in Table 4 consisted of small amount of duff resting on glacial till. STUs 1, 2 and 4 filled with water as soon as the depositional material was removed. Table 4. STU Soil Log STU# Depth Description Comments 0-15 curbs(0-6") Duff Center of footprint 1 15-41 cmbs(6-16") Brown loamy sand w/3/4 to 2"rounded Water @10 cmbs gravel,glacial till 2 0-20 cmbs(0-8") Glacial till @ surface,water @ 10cmbs North east corner 0-10 cmbs(0-4") Duff South east corner 3 10-41 cmbs(4-16") Same as STU1&2,glacial till 0-3 cmbs(0-1.5") Duff,water @30 cmbs South west corner 4 3-41 cmbs(1.5-16") Same as STUs1,2,3,glacial till 0-7 cmbs(0-3") Duff North west corner 5 7-41 cmbs(3-16") Same as STUs 1-4,glacial till ; t i, P Tye 1 .,,,.w . . i.. Y n.4, +'fib rr•k, fit,a 'a� ' i gym. z � " 4 , f l °rte ✓ A . y.:' Figure 6. STU1 center of tower footprint, typical showing glacial till. flG IzEM S Page 18 of 29 of Summary The proposed cell tower is to be located on the highest point in this area. Five shovel probes located within the footprint of the tower revealed that the surface of cell tower footprint is covered with a thin layer of duff resting on what appears to be glacial till. No cultural resources were noted during the pedestrian survey or the presence/absence testing. Based on the testing results which suggest that the tower footprint is located on glacial till, it appears that no additional archaeological work is necessary. However, there may be some potential for cultural resources given the dense understory which hampered ground surface visibility. If any cultural resources or human remains are encountered during the construction activities, the Inadvertent Discover Procedures outlined below should be implemented. References Cited or Consulted Atwater, Brian, and Andrew L. Moore 1992 A Tsunami about 1000 years ago in Puget Sound, Washington. Science 258:1614-1617. Barnosky, Cathy W., Patricia M. Anderson, and Patrick J. Bartlein 1987 The Northwestern U.S. during Deglaciation: Vegetational History and Paleoclimatic Implications. In North American and Adjacent Oceans During the Last Deglaciation, edited by W. F. Ruddiman and H. E. Wright, Jr., pp. 289-321. The Geology of North America. Vol. K-3. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado. Bergland, Eric O. 1983 Prehistory and Ethnography: Olympic National Park, Washington. National Park Service, Pacific Northwest Region Division of Cultural Resources, Seattle, Washington. Blukis Onat, Astrida R. 1980 Natural and Cultural Forces Affecting the Deposition and Preservation of Prehistoric Materials Along the Southern Northwest Coast of North America. Proceedings of the CCE Field-Symposium, Coastal-Archaeology Session, Shimoda, Japan, August, 1980. M.L. Schwartz, editor. Bureau for Faculty Research, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington. 1987 RP3 Identification of Prehistoric Archaeological Resources in the Northern Puget Sound Study Unit. On file, DAHP, Olympia. Boyd, Robert 1990 Demographic History, 1774-1874. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7, Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, ppg. 135-148. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bucknam, Robert C., Eileen Hemphill-Haley, and Estella B. Leopold 1992 Abrupt Uplift within the Past 1700 years at Southern Puget Sound, Washington. Science 258:1611-1614. Page 19 of 29 Lly:_ Burns, Robert. 1985 The Shape and Form of Puget Sound. Puget Sound Books. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Campbell, Sarah K. 1981 The Duwamish No. 1 Site:A Lower Puget Sound Shell Midden. University of Washington, Institute for Environmental Studies, Office of Public Archaeology Research Report 1. Seattle. Castile, George Pierre (editor) 1985 The Indians of Puget Sound: The Notebooks of Myron Eells. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Croes, Dale R. and Eric Blinman, eds. 1980 Hoko River: A 2500 Year Old Fishing Camp on the Northwest Coast of North America. Washington State University, Laboratory of Anthropology, Reports of Investigations 58. Pullman. Eells, Myron 1889 The Twana, Chemakum, and Klallam Indians of Washington Territory. Smithsonian Institute Annual Report for 1887, pp. 605-681. Washington, D.C. Elmendorf, William W. 1990 Chemakum: In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7, Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, ppg. 438-440. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Eronen, Matti, Tuovi Kankainen, and Matsuo Tsukada 1987 Late Holocene Sea Level Record in a Core from the Puget Lowland, Washington. Quaternary Research 27:1470159. Fenneman, N. M. 1931 Physiography of the Western United States. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y. Franklin, Jerry F., and C. T. Dyrness 1973 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washi gton. USDA, Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-8. [Reprinted 1988, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis] Gallison, James D. 1994 Slab Camp:An Early to Middle Holocene Olcott Complex in the Eastern Olympic Mountains of Washington. Ph.D. Dissert tion, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman. Geologic Map of Washington. 1961. Geologic Map of Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. Gibbs, George LOG ITEM Page 20 of 29 Page 9(Q of • • 1855 Report on Indians. In Report of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Most Practical and Economic Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. Senate Executive Document 78, 2nd Session, 33rd Congress, Washington, D.C. 1877 Tribes of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon. In Contributions to North America Ethnology 1:157-241. Grant, D. and A. Kretser 2010 Historic Properties Assessment for Zelatched Point in Jefferson County, Washington. Report on file, DAHP Olympia. Gunther, E. 1973 Ethnobotany of Western Washington: The Knowledge and Use of Indigenous Plants by Native Americans. University of Washington Press, Seattle. (Revised ed.) 1972 Klallam Ethnography. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 1. Seattle. Gustafson, Carl E., Delbert Gilbow, and Richard D. Daugherty 1979 The Manis Mastodon Site: Early Man on the Olympic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, No. 3, 157-164. Hartmann, Glenn 2008 Cultural Resources Assessment for the O'Dell Dock and Tram Project in Coyle, Jefferson County, Washington. Report on file, DAHP Olympia. Henderson, Jan A., Robin D. Lesher, David H. Peter, David C. Shaw 1989 Forested Plant Associations of the Olympic National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Hebert, Marie 2013 Email communication to Mr. Adam E. Escalona dated August 26, 2013. Hess, Sean C., Astrida Blukis Onat, and Sheila A. Stump. 1990 Archaeological Resource Assessment of Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station Properties in Jefferson and Kitsap Counties, Washington. BOAS, Inc., Seattle, Washington. NADB Document No. 1345803 on file, DAHP Olympia. Hunt, Mrs. Gerald A. 1970 National Register of Historic Places Inventory— Nomination Form, Fort Townsend (45JE26). On file, DAHP Olympia. Keeting, Virginia (editor) 1976 Dungeness: The Lure of a River. Olympic Printers, Port Angeles, Washington. Kidd, Robert S. 1964 A Synthesis of Western Washington Prehistory from the Perspective of Three Occupation Sites. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle. Kauhi, T. C., and J. Marked Page 21 of 29 ITEM EM • 2009 Washington Statewide Archaeology Predictive Model Report. GeoEngineers, Seattle. Leopold, E.B., R.J. Nickmann, J.I. Hedges and J.R. Ertel. 1982 Pollen and Lignin Records of Late Quaternary Vegetation, Lake Washington. Science 218:1305-1307. Lindeman, Glen and Keith Williams 1985 RP3 Document, Agriculture Study Unit. Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. McKee, Bates 1972 Cascadia: The Geologic Evolution of the Pacific Northwest. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. Meany, Edmond S. 1915 Vancouver's Discovery of Puget Sound. The MacMillan Company, New York. Miller, Kris 2013 Email communication to Mr. Adam E. Escalona dated August 5, 2013. Morgan, Vera (editor) 1999 The SR-101 Sequim Bypass Archaeological Project: Mid- to Late-Holocene Occupations on the Northern Olympic Peninsula, Clallam County, Washington. Eastern Washington University Reports in Archaeology and History 100-108. Archaeological and Historical Services, Cheney, Washington. Nelson, Alan R., S.Y. Johnson, R.E. Wells, S.K. Pezzopane, H.M. Kelsey, B.L. Sherrod, L. Bradley, R.D. Koehler III, R.C. Bucknam, R. Haugerud and W.T. Laprade. 2002 Field and Laboratory Data from an Earthquake History Study of the Toe Jam Hill Fault, Bainbridge Island, Washington. Open-File Report 02-0060. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Available at: nttp://oubsusc1s.ctoviofI2002/oft-02-006Q. Accessed November 30, 2011. Olympic Peninsula Intertribal Cultural Advisory Committee 2002 Native Peoples of the Olympic Peninsula: Who We Are, edited by Jacilee Wray. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Rice, David G. 1985 Identification Component. Revised 1986 by Leland M. Stilson. In RP3 Document, Paleoindian Study Unit. On file, DAHP Olympia. Ruby, Robert H. and John A. Brown 1992 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pacific Northwest, Revised Edition. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman and London. Russell, Karen and Jeanne Bean 1978 Marrowstone. Port Townsend Publishing Company, Inc., Port Townsend, Washington. Page 22 of 29 OG I1 EM S Page of\ I Samuels, S.R. (ed.) 1991 Ozette Archaeological Project Research Reports Volume 1: House Structure and Floor Midden. WSU Department of Anthropology Reports of Investigations 63 and National Park Service, Pacific Northwest Regional Office, Pullman and Seattle. Shaffer, Anne 2004 Nearshore Habitat and Resources of the Northern Olympic Peninsula Tribes. In, Native American Traditional and Contemporary Knowledge of the Northern Olympic Peninsula Nearshore:A cooperative study by Anne Shaffer, Coastal Watershed Institute and Jacilee Wray, Olympic National Park. Olympic Peninsula Intertribal Cultural Advisory Committee, Kingston, Washington and the Coastal Watershed Institute, Port Angeles, Washington. Sherrod, Brian L., A. R. Nelson, H. M. Kelsey, T. M. Brocher, R. J. Blakely, C. S. Weaver, N. K. Rountree, B. S. Rhea and B. S. Jackson. 2003 The Catfish Lake Scarp, Allyn, Washington: Preliminary Field Data and Implications for Earthquake Hazards Posed by the Tacoma Fault. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-0455. Electronic document accessed May 7, 2010. http://pubs.usgs.qov/of/2003/of03-455/of03-455.pdf. Spier, Leslie 1936 Tribal Distribution in Washington. General Series in Anthropology 3. Menasha, Wisconsin. Suttles, Wayne and Barbara Lane 1990 Central Coast Salish. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7, Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 453-475. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 7, Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 485-502. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Swanton, John R. 1952 The Indian Tribes of North America. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 145. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Thorson, Robert M. 1980 Ice-Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland, Washington, during the Vashon Stade (Late Pleistocene). Quaternary Research 13:303-321. 1981 Isostatic Effects of the Last Glaciation in the Puget Lowland, Washington. United States Department of Geological Survey, Open-File Report 81-370. Tollefson, Thor C. 1974 Fisheries Resources of Washington. Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia. Tsukada, M., S. Sugita, and D.M. Hibbert Page 23 of 29 L to &i 1981 Paleoecology of the Pacific Northwest I. Late Quaternary Vegetation and Climate. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Theoretische and Angewandte Limnologie 21:730-773. URS Corporation and BOAS, Inc. 1987 The Duwamish No. 1 Site: 1986 Data Recovery. Submitted to the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Contract No. CW/F2-82, Task 48.08. On file with DAHP, Olympia. Vancouver, George, Joseph Baker, and John Warner 1798 [1872] A chart shewing part of the coast of N.W. America: with the tracks of His Majesty's sloop Discovery and armed tender Chatham. Scale: 1:100,000. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Held by University of Washington Libraries, Government Publications Section, Seattle. Wessen, Gary C. 1985 Identification Component. In RP3 Document, Southern Puget Sound Study Unit. Revised 1986 by M. Leland Stilson. On file, DAHP Olympia. Whitlock, C. 1992 Vegetational and Climatic History of the Pacific Northwest during the Last 20,000 Years: Implications for Understanding Present-Day Biodiversity. Northwest Environmental Journal 8:5-28. Attachment A: Inadvertent Discovery Plan INADVERTENT DISCOVERY PROCEDURES In the event of an inadvertent archaeological discovery during the construction of the cell tower and/or other associated construction activities, the following procedures should be implemented consistent with State laws (RCW 27.44 [Indian Graves and Records], RCW 27.53 [Archaeological Sites and Resources], and RCW 68.60 [Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves]). All construction activities will cease immediately. The contractor will secure the area and notify: (1) the property owner, (2) DAHP and (3) Tribal representatives listed below. Details of the discovery will be discussed with these parties and the decisions about subsequent treatments will be developed based on these discussions. If human remains are discovered, all work will stop. The area will be secured and the following entities will be notified: (1) property owner, (2) DAHP, (3) Jefferson County Sheriff, and (4) Jefferson County Coroner(see list below). The Coroner will assume jurisdiction over the human remains and will determine if the remains are forensic or non-forensic. If the remains are determined non-forensic, the Coroner will report that finding to the DAHP, who will assume jurisdiction and report this finding to the appropriate cemeteries and Tribes. The State Physical Anthropologist will examine the human remains and determine if the remains are Indian or non- Indian and report that finding to the affected parties. DAHP will then handle all consultation with the affected parties as to the future preservation or excavation and disposition of the remains. LOG IF,EM Page 24 of 29 .a., 5 I . e p 6T57 • • DISCOVERY CONTACT LIST • Mr. Adam E. Escalona, Project Manager, 206.730.7956 • DAHP, Local Government Archaeologist, Gretchen Kaehler, 360.586.3088 • DAHP, State Physical Anthropologist, Dr. Guy Tasa, 360.586.3534 • Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Tony Hernandez, 360.385.3831 • Jefferson County Coroner's Office, Coroner Scott W. Rosekrans, 360.385.9180 • Skokomish Indian Tribe, THPO, Kris Miller, 360.426.4232, ext. 215 • Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Cultural Resources Director, Marie Hebert 360.297.6359 Page 25 of 29 ITEM 3 ( of c3( • Zoe Ann Lamp From: Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 07,2014 9:05 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Karl Hatton Subject: RE:AT&T 200ft Application_ZON13-00039 Zoe, My experience in the past would have included that the applicant to exhaust all the other options. To date,AT&T hasn't contacted us about a lease or other qualifying issues that would indicate that they have excluded the potential use of the JeffCom/Jefferson County tower on Coyle. Thanks for the update. r Bryon Gunnerson Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC 231 River Run Rd Sequim,WA 98382 http://wwvv.uunnersonconsulting.com/ +1-425-829-3333 Cellular +1-844-333-3600 Toll Free CONFIDENTIAL,PROPRIETARY and PRIVILEGED:The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments constitutes proprietary and confidential information of Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC and its affiliates.This communication contains information that is proprietary and may be subject to the work product or other privilege or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure even if received in error.The communication is intended for the use of the addressee only.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies,electronic,paper or otherwise,which you may have of this communication. Any and all information contained herein is not in any way to be considered legal,financial or real estate advice. From: Zoe Ann Lamp [mailto:ZLamp @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 3:43 PM To: Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com Cc: Karl Hatton Subject: RE: AT&T 200ft Application_ZON13-00039 They were granted an extension to provide the information by May 25, 2014. Our department would likely grant another extension. Historically we have been very flexible extending additional information request due dates. Zoe Ann From: Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com [mailto:bryon.qunnerson(c1gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 3:18 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Karl Hatton Subject: RE: AT&T 200ft Application_ZON13-00039 Zoe Ann, LOG ITEM s-U 1 Page ( of 3 • S I'm not surprised because they can't obtain a lease with the landowner and would therefore not have a reason for the permit. When does their clock run out for the County? 1"N"\\ Bryon Gunnerson Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC 231 River Run Rd Sequin,WA 98382 http://www.gunnersonconsulting.com/ +1-425-829-3333 Cellular +1-844-333-3600 Toll Free CONFIDENTIAL,PROPRIETARY and PRIVILEGED:The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments constitutes proprietary and confidential information of Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC and its affiliates.This communication contains information that is proprietary and may be subject to the work product or other privilege or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure even if received in error.The communication is intended for the use of the addressee only.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies,electronic,paper or otherwise,which you may have of this communication. Any and all information contained herein is not in any way to be considered legal,financial or real estate advice. From: Zoe Ann Lamp [mailto:ZLamp @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 1:17 PM To: Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com Cc: Karl Hatton Subject: RE: AT&T 200ft Application_ZON13-00039 AT&T has not responded. Zoe Ann From: Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com [mailto:bryon.gunnerson @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 1:06 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Karl Hatton Subject: AT&T 200ft Application_ZON13-00039 Zoe Ann, Did AT&T ever respond and did your office make a determination? /4\41\ Bryon Gunnerson Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC 231 River Run Rd Sequim,WA 98382 http://www.gunnersonconsulting.com/ +1-425-829-3333 Cellular LOG ITEM +1-844-333-3600 Toll Free 2 o. of Day,, • • CONFIDENTIAL,PROPRIETARY and PRIVILEGED:The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments constitutes proprietary and confidential information of Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC and its affiliates.This communication contains information that is proprietary and may be subject to the work product or other privilege or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure even if received in error.The communication is intended for the use of the addressee only.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies,electronic,paper or otherwise,which you may have of this communication. Any and all information contained herein is not in any way to be considered legal,financial or real estate advice. LOG ITEM 3 I Alb Lamp Bryon.Gunnerson @gmail.com ,it: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:17 PM ,o: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Karl Hatton; brett.reall @gccss.net Subject: LB_JeffCom_Coyle Road_AT&T Application Zoe, r We received a strange call from AT&T's site acquisition group in Portland,a Phil Anderson,today. o He offered the new tower to be available to JeffCom when it's installed. 10- Brett and I called Phil back to verify what the offer was and we were distinctly told that: o JeffCom could apply for space on the tower when it's complete,with no guarantee of acceptance of the application or any terms. o When we asked if they were going to honor the offer we made,the answer was no. o As you know,Jefferson County and JeffCom have resolved all of their issues for the Coyle Road tower that is already installed and JeffCom has no interest in collocation on the new AT&T tower. y We asked when AT&T was going to discuss collocating on the Jefferson County-JeffCom Coyle road tower and we were informed that they didn't want to discuss this. o It appears that AT&T is still not making any attempt to seek availability on existing towers. o We have reached out to AT&T several times. 0 CCC S Bryon Gunnerson Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services, LLC 231 River Run Rd Sequim, WA 98382 http://www.gunnersonconsulting.com/ +1-425-829-3333 Cellular i 1-844-333-3600 Toll Free CONFIDENTIAL,PROPRIETARY and PRIVILEGED:The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments constitutes proprietary and confidential information of Gunnerson Consulting and Communication Site Services,LLC and its affiliates.This communication contains information that is proprietary and may be subject to the work product or other privilege or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure even if received in error.The communication is intended for the use of the addressee only.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and destroy any copies,electronic,paper or otherwise,which you may have of this communication. Any and all information contained herein is not in any way to be considered legal,financial or real estate advice. LOG ITEM ji FF s9 Page / of / 1 g