Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2014-00471 - WITHDRAWN • • BLD14-00471 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Review Type: I Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD14-00471 Received Date: 12/30/2014 SITE ADDRESS: 132 ALDER DR PORT TOWNSEND, 98368 OWNER: JEFFREY JACKMAN PHONE: 503-422-2675 SHELLY STROM 415 W MCLOUGHLIN BLVD VANCOUVER WA 98660-2511 9408 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 940800057 Section: 13 Township: 30 N Range: 2\A CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: FRED ESSON PHONE: 360-531-0589 PROJECT DESCRIPTIOP NEW POLE BUILDING NO HEAT- NO WATER - NO STORAGE SEP03-00101 TYPE OF WORK GAR SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 8,700.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: UH CODE EDITION: 2012 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: 448 SETBACK: DECK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: eu sec( Trop: Prop:T �((Yl�� Total: Total: Routing Date: 21 3 VI Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $146.00 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Plan Check $94.90 SRE 12/29/14 154005 State Building Code $4.50 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Total: $245.40 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_App_Bid.rpt 1/9/2015 • 0 _ ---Alder Drive ` - l y' 95' +i I 3 I a I ca i > /i i . . I 1 (25' setback from Alder Drive) • � o -4-- ..■ t molloortel" I �J�/ i a) i // house ! / I I 8 I / / I 1 1 I / Y o / U 1 co I 1 / � OM 1 N ' ..... 6 I N . ! Y I 0 1 v I r r . I 3 i m . ■ • u)11\ i li m �`p `� ` septic tanks ! i ()(1,4„ :� o�y septic line \ ` ! jit Dec % I I SID I 0 cP ,rte 5 7'(-37) g) I Glendon ! eribij C7 = i 0, module 7. c o .N I 3 I - °m I - - - m2, I o 0 30' down slope 1 protection area 1 • ' ° 01 proposed ! • 14'x30 pole Glendon ! I barn 30` module ! 3 I • 1 i 30' down-slope I i protection area I ..,,� i 1 d 5' setback I P4 H— 84' Site Address: 132 Alder Drive Parcel Number: 940800057 0' 8' 16' Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom shit l 1 I I Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503) 422-2675 1 Scale • • 4 , t 4. * • C- i :■_.):- Ct I Iti ed'• 7)1 ;s ;'7Le--- f)/Cf"L r , I Lkje4E e.-11/ (..- -- -- . , •• 1 1 ThCi VIICS ., 7M 4, Or,+,4, 1 • *NO r*,- 1 V A.lift RI • C i fitv, ` LA/CI• l � JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REFUND REQUEST/POSTING MEMO DATE: 3/23/15 The amount of: 570.00 received from: Jeff Jackman for (case#): BLD14-00471 is to be refunded to: Jeff Jackman Jeff Jackman 415 W Mcloughlin BLVD. Vancouver WA 98660-2511 as a result of: Canceled building permit- refund all but one hour of Building Base fee's Date & number of original receipt: 12/29/14 receipt#154005 REVENUE FUND CODE NO. REVENUE SOURCE NAME AMOUNT 001-250-000 369.90.00.0000 BAD CHECK FEE 127-000-010 346.23.11.5200 WATER AVAILABILITY FEES-EH H2O 127-000-010 346.23.11.5400 DCD BLDG REVIEW-SEPTIC 127-000-010 346.23.11.5800 SHORT/LONG PLAT FEES 143-000-010 322.10.00.0000 BUILDING BASE & INSPECTIONS 70.00 143-000-010 322.10.10.0000 BUILDING PERMIT RENEWAL FEE 143-000-010 322.40.80.0000 ADDRESSING FEES 143-000-010 341.60.00.0000 DUPLICATING SERVICES 143-000-010 341.75.00.0000 SALE OF MAPS& PUBLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.70.00.0000 DCD TECH ASSIST FEE 143-000-010 345.81.00.0000 SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.20.0000 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEV. PERM. 143-000-010 345.81.30.0000 CURRENT USE TAX ASSESSMENT APP 143-000-010 345.81.40.0000 ZONING APPROVAL APPLICATIONS 143-000-010 345.81.60.0000 CONVERSION OPTION HARVEST PLAN 143-000-010 345.83.00.0000 PLAN CHECK FEES 143-000-010 345.83.10.0000 FIRE MARSHALL PLAN REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0000 SEPA/ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 143-000-010 345.89.00.0143 PERMIT SCANNING FEE • 143-000-010 346.22.30.0040 DCD WATER REVIEW 143-000-010 389.40.00.0000 CASP - NON-REVENUE CUST DEPOSITS 180-000-010 322.40.40.0000 MISC APPLICATIONS & PERMITS 180-000-010 322.40.50.0000 RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATIONS 180-000-010 343.20.10.0000 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES 650-511-000 386.00.00.0000 STATE BUILDING CODE FEES TOTAL REFUND I 70.00 Mr. Authorized person signature: Treasurer's check # Date: Treasurer's signature: 4./.40,c1 A vIrl . . r • • Sally Ellis From: Carl Smith Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:10 AM To: Sally Ellis Subject: RE: BLD14-00471 Sally: Thank you for these details. I will offer him the$70 refund. Carl From: Sally Ellis Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:03 AM To: Carl Smith Subject: RE: BLD14-00471 Carl Jeff Jackman paid the following Building base fee$146.00 Plan Check fee of$94.90 Consistency review fee of$228.00 E/H fee of$79.00 Scanning fee of$19.00 State surcharge fee of$4.50 Totally permit fees of$571.40 Plan check, Consistency, E/H Environmental health-all did there review- if we are going to refund something to Mr.Jackman- I would suggest it be a portion of the Building Base fee- (remember permit technician time) is included in that fee- I easily spent over an hour with Jeff Jackman therefore-2014 I believe was$76.00 hour-therefore if we do a refund on building base $146.00-76= $70.00 dollar refund HERE ARE SUSAN PORTO NOTES FROM TIDEMARK- When comparing the as-built record drawing of the septic system and the site plan provided, it does not appear that there is sufficient room to the north of the drainfield and protection area to allow for this building and meet the 5'setback required. Enclosed is a copy of the record drawing from the septic file SEP03-101. Contact the licensed designer, Bernt Ericsen to consult on the location of the septic system and alternative to allow for approval. Resubmit revisions for further review. It does not look like to me-anyone is telling Mr.Jackman-that this cannot be done-however I am not aware of all the details Susan discussed with Mr.Jackman- This permit is still in a pending status- if Mr.Jackman truly wishes to cancel the permit-please let me know- I hope the above information is helpful, if I can do anything else-please let me know. Thank you Sal 1 r • 0 I . From: Carl Smith Sent:Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:04 PM To: Sally Ellis Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Sally: can you remind me what the$571 was for that Mr.Jackman is wanting refunded? Please see his email I below. Thanks, Carl From:Jeff Jackman [mailto:Jeff@pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent:Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:21 PM To: Carl Smith Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Hi Carl, I'm re-sending this message that I originally sent to you about a month ago, as I have not received a response. See below. Thank you, Jeff From: Jeff Jackman [mailto:jeff @oointsourcesolutions.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:42 PM To: 'csmith @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Hi again Carl, I received a voicemail from Elizabeth Williams informing me that the permit refund I requested will not be forthcoming. As I indicated earlier, I did my best to navigate your permit process and was met time and time again with extremely slow responses and misinformation. The permit was ultimately denied because the location of the septic system is different than that in the approved design. I was never notified of this change, and nobody ever advised me that that is something that I should look into prior to paying for the permit. I had the drawings that were included with the septic permit approval and had no reason to think that the location would have been changed. I was wary of writing the check given my experiences with the department on this project up to that point. I asked what would happen to the money if the permit was denied. I was specifically told that there is no way it would be denied and to go hire an engineer and not worry about it. Based on that, I spent almost$1000 that day. Also, had the responses been timely earlier in the process, an engineer would have never been necessary, and I would only be out$571. I would again like to request a refund of the permit fee. I would also like to request documentation of DCD time spent on the review for this project. The proposed structure was to include no plumbing and no electricity. It was to be a very simple structure. Even if the reviewers spent many hours on this (which does not seem necessary), no inspections were required as the permit was denied. It is my understanding that the fee I paid would have included those inspections. At least that was the case with the only other structure that I've ever built(my house that the pole barn was supposed to be placed next to). I strongly feel that the poor customer service I received from your department should be factored into your further consideration of my refund request. Jeff Jackman From: Jeff Jackman [mailto:Jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:32 PM To: 'csmith @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: BLD14-00471 Good Afternoon Carl, 2 • S My name is Jeff Jackman and I built my future retirement home at 132 Alder Drive, Port Townsend in 2004. I live in Vancouver. I would like to relay to you my experience in attempting to obtain a building permit for a small pole building at that address. It started approximately one year ago. In February 2014, I stopped into the building department to ask what I needed to do to construct a pole building. I was given a handout for"Non-Engineered Pole Buildings". I reviewed the document and the various forms on your website and had a few questions, so I decided to call the DCD office. I made multiple calls over several days and someone finally got back to me. At that time I was told that if I wanted the county to answer any specific questions, I would need to submit a CAM form along with a check for$76. I completed the form and mailed the check on March 11, 2014. I heard nothing for several weeks. I again attempted to make contact and when I finally did, I was told that the CAM was never received (I know that this is not the case, as I have a record that the check was cashed by DCD). I was then advised to resubmit the CAM form along with a copy of the cancelled check. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. I finally made contact and spoke to David Johnson who then referred me to Frank B. We had a 5 minute conversation in which I was told that there are no issues, that I should move ahead, that I never should have submitted the CAM form in the first place, and that I would receive a refund. I never did receive a refund, despite inquiring about it several times since. I then completed the building permit application, the site plan, etc. on April 15. I had my neighbor hand deliver these documents to the DCD office as it very difficult for me to get to Port Townsend during the work week. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. At this point I made contact with Mary Blain and I asked her if she could look at the submittal and tell me if anything was missing. She said she couldn't find what was dropped off and suggested I email the documents for her review. She looked at what I sent and requested additional information and some changes to the plans. I made the requested changes right away and sent them back the same day. This was in July. Again, no response, so after a few calls, I emailed Mary again in September, with no response (I later learned that she was on maternity leave). Out of desperation, I hired a pole building contractor from Sequim to go to the DCD office and see what he could find out (it's now late October). The contractor was told that the plans need an engineers stamp and that the county does not have any provisions for prescriptive(non-engineered) pole buildings. Next(early November), I contacted Frank Benskin to try to clear up the engineering issue. Mr. Benskin was also unaware of any"non-engineered pole building" handout, but told me that Mary Blain was back and that I should talk to her. Mary also indicated that engineering would be required. I then sent her a copy of the handout(a copy of which she had already sent to me earlier in the process) and she agreed that it is applicable and that no engineering is necessary. She also said the revised plans look fine and that I should proceed. Based on my experience to that point, I decided I should wait until I could go to the office in person to finalize everything. I came in with multiple copies and sat down with Sally and Mary in December. I was then told that the county had revised the"non-engineered pole building" rules just a couple of weeks before, so now I'm back to needing an engineer. This was very unwelcome news as I had been trying to get approval for the better part of a year. They explained that since I hadn't yet paid the fee, the project is subject to the new requirements. I asked if they were sure that everything was in order except for the engineering. I wanted to know before I spent the money. I was assured that if I paid the permit fee and hired an engineer, all would be well and I would finally have my permit. I left the office and went directly to see an engineer. He did his work and submitted it to the county, in person, on my behalf. I didn't hear anything for a while, so I started leaving messages again. No response, but I did receive a letter from the Health Department. The site plan I submitted was based upon the septic design approved by the county. The letter sent to me the other day includes an "as built" site plan that is different than the design. This is the first time that I have ever seen this site plan. On the as-built, there is not enough room for the proposed pole building. As suggested in the Health Department letter, I contacted the septic installer. The installer told me that sometimes the as-built varies from the design and that there is nothing that can be done about it. So, in addition to spending a year trying to get this figured out, I have spent$76 on an apparently unnecessary CAM review(that was supposed to be refunded), $340 on engineering that I shouldn't have needed, and $571 on a permit that will never be issued. I have received incredibly poor customer service and conflicting information throughout the entire process. I realize that there is nothing that can be done about the money wasted on engineering, but I am requesting a refund of the $76 CAM fee and the $571 permit fee that I paid to DCD. I don't know if your department typically refunds any fees, but given my experience over the past year, it is more than appropriate in this case. This process has been a complete waste of hard earned money and a shockingly frustrating experience all around. Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 3 . • • r „,..... STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS rill LATERAL ANALYSIS ‘ ,'.-% 2.1. \\\\\. P 44`44: V� \\C-\>s--- gasew AI JACKMAN POLE BUILDING 132 Alder Drive Port Townsend, WA 98368 �P Q,C W A s4,,O, VAC ���4 fZ ' cr,//l l `f IsTER� ��� L E EXP. DATE: 05 / 05 / 16A/.'rs� REVIEWED FOR '46 CODE COMPLIANCE 411: VI) JEFFERSON COUNTY DCD Michaei J Anderson PE&PLS No.27665 Contact the Building Depannges BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 330 Cleveland Street at 379-4450 Prior to making plans Port Townsend, WA 908368 or revisions to trle app APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED . � ❑ REJECTED $,- 1-PCT• P£l ,are anrro ved emr-ptIrtn en, c orrIt7,1t,rtr,. w rtc VL918t 0 Date kit(til�� Reviewer 0/155 - Fr r,- ; --.7!!rae ce tZer; arse rep , el;crtn. Wommill r U • 17- I plc ,/4-6-P44441 14o44 ote—/2—/C —,re217,,,/ egicrv4 //2 -- 549/0- 8, NAL/ „&x/3 " e7// ==. ; /4467 tewmo Le P,M.14 ; /27"Att,idez*Pf.z() ief& /bsAts- 7..) /br. ,/,`""' .4 „X ; /Z1 r717/44-e- 6945-- 44-13)./4„ ,' . -34/77-) 7777 Pciev PA,/,;-71 /3(/0)(e , ee-,42 71- 457 zir 74. 4.4l2),16/64- 04-29(//1) 90 0014 ..A./i47t; '.4-44(4 ,p /447(Wti/ (0) 64.,/,/; 3,:i4V2V 0 511760 • • 31-6-7 2 2f 2 , f .- t - ti/ , X47) --- I /Z0/3.) 4 (.1;2,4)/2 Z -I- '. /47% { s , N L Wiz - ��3Z Z,4,7 0506)) er WO/ /.3,z)4- to 4' /0 irOz) 6 ` a L-t reI ° — Paz- �0_ft_2 l ( / , = ) A- /2e6, - 49.551 / / a a. W � II • • (29 gauge metal roof,3:12 pitch,14"overhangs) - -t- 9' (3/8"plywood siding nailed to wall girts and vertical 2x4 blocking 24"0/C with 8d nails) 11' 6 Elevation lap siding 1 — A 9' (29 gauge metal siding) (open) 12' 11' 10.5' V i ___ (5/16"cement-board skirting) East Elevation West Elevation (29 gauge metal roof,3:12 pitch, 14"overhangs) (29 gauge metal siding) fig u..,, z 10.5' LL'• 12' L��J wk" c' rn (5/16"cement-board skirting) 1��. North Elevation ` M ,.° a 132 Alder Drive Pole Building 0' 4' 8' I I I Scale • • J L Area=420 sq.ft. / Truss span-14' arip Post Spacing- SC c Post height=9'-12'above grade Corner posts=6x6 PT for ground contact Side posts=6x8 PT for ground contact ›? X el] tr_el . .eX5 7YP II n EY LI.. 0 Post Spacing Plan V 0' 2' 4' 132 Alder Drive r it/1/7(c U4 Scale • • • ;z Ak .V Drive POLE BUILDING CROSS SECTION Norm E:',,LE f_`_ ___ ____ (3) 16d-?URLTNS TC BLOCK , / / 29 GAUGE ROOF METAL, not sirov;t 2 x 6 I'L`RLINS(try,24"O.C. •#2 PC, cam:i4 t1 orer� 2 x 6 BLOCKS 24"0.C. ��r,IYvSS S�`h -�..., 1r c:®rw:r..t�e�P`-�l 1'e i-j��1}9�(3)lU6 1t4a5 MANI1F.TRUSSES �` ���` CM, e�c.�s�i >s bloc* �f 3 1bd i,11 (I)ea:`'?side of post tit.___* • ■ T 0\__ (3)16d-EACH CONNECTION 2 x 4 BRACING —.— 3"BOLT CLEARANCE.FROM as required by truss engineer I i ENDS OF BLOCK 18"2 x 6/2x 8 BLOCK EACH SIDE OF POST .— 2 x 6 DF#2 WALL GIRT @a 24"O.C. 3/4"GALV.MACH.BOLT VI/WASHER �� 6 x 8 PT POST •ner y ga { c<;v i ."-t- + 6x B pt post(7 corners&gable wails (3)each past }. ( ) 2 x 6 WIND GIRT @ 48"O.0 #2 OF/ ` edge nail wind girt to wall girt w116:1@ 24"o.c. • !4 toenail wind girt to past w/(4)16d @ each end Frir^ l.tv I2 i 1 MIN.(2) 6d AT POST it I��� "29 GAUGE WALL METAL,,c. Vea-t`c Ali ri"."jk* I- 1 not shown?j,t w o c;d .,.,Ai...„) c„,,..50 J'w�wr..k.\ 1 I '4 Ce k bor_dzt peaty 5t 4 t5 { i,96vev--0,v tt1 cv.5 /f,S,4.ot **At 1 1 (2)PT2x6 �S- z.,��,rat s r + c vCV' - �__ . ,k.V4 ^'�A— = i� GRADE TAI. ARTIi —1 i 1= I-``o W4,! 1=1 1{_ backf it pcstholes with clean .^ / /,'i 1 earth compacted to 90%; -11=1 4 �v T ! I moisture caritent n.t e.10% iii I }y'� Y `1e 11---i:i i"POUR: D CONCRETE PAD 1� M ��{' Wig� � ` • • sON `'o y a 1 1NGS JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON-ENGINEERED POLE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Building Area- Max. 864 square feet Post Height- Max 12' feet above grade Post Spacing- Max. 12 feet on center Post Size- 6 x 8 pressure treated(PT)for ground contact 6 x 6 PT post @ corners&gable walls Post Holes- 24"in.diameter by 4'-0"deep into UNDISTURBED soil Footings- 24"x 6"thick poured concrete option:(2)unopened sacks of concrete mix placed in posthole and saturated with water prior to post placement Backfill- Clean earth surrounding posts compacted to 90%,moisture content n.t.e. 10% Girts- 2 x 6 wall girts @ 24"o.c;2 x 6 wind girts @ 48"o.c. Roof Purlins- Minimum 2 x 6 DF#2 @ 24"o.c.,overlapped 1' at supports with(3) 16d nails, connected to 2 x 6 truss blocks with(3) 16d nails on each side Trusses- Must be engineered/manufactured,spanning not more than 36'. Connect to posts with(1)hot-dipped galvanized 3/4"through bolt, support truss on 18"2 x 6 or 2 x 8 block connected to post with(2)hot-dipped galvanized 3/4"through bolts. Truss bracing, web stiffeners,rat-runs,etc. to be specified by engineer and installed per specifications. Engineered truss specifications shall provided to inspector on-site at the time of framing inspection. *Trusses must be designed per site conditions contact Jefferson County OCD for snow loads* Engineering is required for pole buildings when the proposed structure: -exceeds 864 square feet in area -has a post height of more than 12' Q, -is in an area with a wind exposure other than`B' C) -is constructed using methods other than those outlined in this document Engineering documents shall include both lateral and vertical analyses,prepared and stamped by a Washington State Licensed Structural Engineer or Architect. Requirements of the analyses shall be �...� transferred onto the construction plans and submitted for review along with supporting calculations. ' . 0 • "1■! ries STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ce --%\'\ Zli LATERAL ANALYSIS - ��, ) 1 QUIP V✓ O gyp, JACKMAN POLE BUILDING 132 Alder Drive Port Townsend, WA 98368 �P QF WAS// ci jai; / \• ;l Z/ o 4T9` Z(/((( fise EXP. DATE: 05 / 05 / 16 REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE JEFFERSON COUNTY DCD Michael J Anderson BUILDING PLAN REVIEW PE&PLSNo.27665 Contact the Building Department 330 Cleveland WA at 379-4450 prior to making changes Port Townsend, WA 908368 ''''r t=J 5;;ns to the approved plans J� APPROVED AS SUBMITTED y c . >- ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED Cl. ❑ REJECTED rn7C:r- PIrrin fxl errev ve €r, rt` 7.3 rAn c-vors cr o tS0g , 1,. t4x V ;.,511 0 tfkizIPtIPettelincr,14,orir iz. vv Date A( efi( Reviewer/'r' e1i ep piicsk le codes end re ;r izitk L . ui VD • ,41-‘4V-41A-Al Z.- v., I 74- -IC eV1912-7- 745,C7, —62a17/ 4/7../7-er,S/4 " 11 ,774014,p ; 4etti/V.0 La/v.0 v.14 ; 77; Avi.Z( ) ) /db%Ats- 7.../e) Iv V lbr711716"" 5) It di>404, #40-X Ott7 • /Z I riel=ve,04-e- (z. /42 .r. ---- La.1-0//v4 7 7,457e-er/- Pth4-7,e "foroz4-4.44.7 - A- it ,X16,116-) /67 r, /170(%,176 ) (44 Ofr, &Ill' >1‘ (1. 73; LU /AZ" xic? ) • 5,477--; •cJAte-efrt-A-A/ Pf746-- (/ 0A/7- ) tq •. Z7 .v7 1E946 s- ‘ P = 17- x 4- )(le4 .41v ('/z/3 ) (74.)(12))/3 v=0W. = x /66/4 0;2(6 / A-/AI ' z4f2ti77ciu: /, 7 5.4,3Z (/500) p/14-46. 4//273-, 7 „ eit4-Z4 / 41- / j - /979 A 72 o6 1-17 2 x ) 0), 050 /zeo ° >6° 0 Ui Cn (29 gauge metal roof,3:12 pitch,14"overhangs) 9' (318"plywood siding nailed to wall girts and vertical 2x4 blocking 24"0/C with 8d nails) 11' j6' nt.boardskirtin9L * South Elevation lap siding ` ♦ `` 9' (29 gauge metal siding) (open) 12' 11' 10.5' (5/16"cement-board skirting) `I East Elevation West Elevation (29 gauge metal roof,3:12 pitch, 14"overhangs) C � ° j (29 gauge metal siding) 10.5' 12' �� v tr LL.! (5116"cement-board skirting) North Elevation 0 132 Alder Drive Pole Building 0' 4' 8' 11111 LU Scale `b • J L Area=420 sq.ft. Truss span=14' Post Spacing=l0'0/C Post height=9'-12'above grade Corner posts=6x6 PT for ground contact Side posts=6x8 PT for ground contact vi- 6X8 rip U 42/5 7-Y-19. 1� 15� 0' 2' 4' Post Spacing Plan I I 132 Alder Drive Scale I ' • • . ;z A►oleo' `fir't ve POLE BUILDING CROSS SECTION NOT TO.S",:':1LE >h- _ (3) 16d- ':JRLT tS'I'C BLOCK / 29 GAUGE ROOF METAL , / not shown 2 x 6 PURLINS @ 24"0.c. .tt:2 Pe t t — 2 x 6 BLOCKS tr 24"O.C. r.iry>$ S}e vt f- r,,:lips o,rer\ pet I'e s-)�ec-rNg 4.,,„,{3)ILL,vn..AS ....,� . ~- ,� csiwR�te��tz 2xb•{y,,,ss1�tocxc .s(�' lbd i,1s MAN'H.TRUSSES -.,..„. aA e«.c■N. r,�4-- (I;pa"y side of post twl i � _ _ m :144 (3)16d-EACH CONNECTION fie o.rZ,rlvyin� 2 x 4 BRACING — 3"BOLT. CLEARANCE FROM as required by truss engineer II µ ENDS OF BLOCK 18"2 x 6/2x 8 BLOCK EACH SIDE OF POST «.1,11 2 x 6 DE#2 WALL GIRT @ 24"O.C. . 2-Vi--- z i 6 x 8 PT POST .Foe 5 rw react cG V`t"e-t- 3/4"GALV.MACH.BOLT W/WASHER 6x 6 pt post(7a earners&gable walls (3)each past 2x6 WIND GIRT @48"O.0 t2' 0h/ edge nail wind girt to wall girt w/16d @ 24"ac t' y li toenail wind girt typos!w/(4)16d @ each end i pt+5d iNtit i� vatf e$ . (Vow,41 t {v 12 I MIN.(2) :6d AT POST r .. '29 GAUGE WALL METAL,.,v, Ll44 t-T 1Jr r-6".i"'s.ilf Vnot shown'�j -"wr..11 � y«roed s:da� cn3v.. _ •k CevAe.k boc f:pc,.s.. `A.tv^1i t, 'w i., (2)PT 2 x 6 ('S.xe. eVeVeat•ftw.S) 91,,,,,,k.u0.4w:it- , C 0 AC.+L G ._ 11;_.._ .. !yf` ^'1�•�= ,..,_ GRADE TAPrti'E RTH 4 `O�� - — � H= ,� •� I�l 1 �, bac/ej? estlrnles with clean !— /� ea compacted to 9U%% ...i 1=i 11� T oishtreeontent rt.t.e.10% '1_-`f }��� V�N! -- i II �� VV % —}I,' 6'POURED CONCRETE PAD \A �J�� Li- _ 4" . , O 0 w IX • • �SkrN�z° JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON-ENGINEERED POLE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Building Area- Max. 864 square feet Post Height- Maxlz' feet above grade Post Spacing- Max. 12 feet on center Post Size- 6 x 8 pressure treated (PT)for ground contact b x 6 PT post @ corners&gable walls Post Holes- 24"in.diameter by 4'-0"deep into UNDISTURBED soil Footings- 24"x 6"thick poured concrete option:(2)unopened sacks of concrete mix placed in posthole and saturated with water prior to post placement Backfill- Clean earth surrounding posts compacted to 90%,moisture content n.t.e. 10% Girts- 2 x 6 wall girts @ 24"o.c;2 x 6 wind girts @ 48"o.c. Roof Purlins- Minimum 2 x 6 DF#2 @a 24"o.c.,overlapped 1' at supports with(3) l6d nails, connected to 2 x 6 truss blocks with(3) 16d nails on each side Trusses- Must be engineered/manufactured,spanning not more than 36'. Connect to posts with(1)hot-dipped galvanized 3/4"through bolt, support truss on 18"2 x 6 or 2 x 8 block connected to post with(2)hot-dipped galvanized 3/4"through bolts. Truss bracing, web stiffeners,rat-runs,etc. to be specified by engineer and installed per specifications. Engineered truss specifications shall provided to inspector on-site at the time of framing inspection. *Trusses must be designed per site conditions contact Jefferson County DCD for snow loads* Engineering is required for pole buildings when the proposed structure: -exceeds 864 square feet in area -has a post height of more than 12' B' ;-is in an area with a wind exposure other than `-is constructed using methods other than those outlined in this document `Engineering documents shall include both lateral and vertical analyses,prepared and stamped by a A ashington State Licensed Structural Engineer or Architect. Requirements of the analyses shall be transferred onto the construction plans and submitted for review along with supporting calculations. . • • Sally Ellis From: Carl Smith Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:04 PM To: Sally Ellis Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Sally: can you remind me what the $571 was for that Mr.Jackman is wanting refunded? Please see his email below. Thanks, Carl From:Jeff Jackman [mailto:jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent:Thursday, March 19, 2015 4:21 PM To: Carl Smith Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Hi Carl, I'm re-sending this message that I originally sent to you about a month ago, as I have not received a response. See below. Thank you, Jeff From: Jeff Jackman [mailto jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 12:42 PM To: 'csmith @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 Hi again Carl, I received a voicemail from Elizabeth Williams informing me that the permit refund I requested will not be forthcoming. As I indicated earlier, I did my best to navigate your permit process and was met time and time again with extremely slow responses and misinformation. The permit was ultimately denied because the location of the septic system is different than that in the approved design. I was never notified of this change, and nobody ever advised me that that is something that I should look into prior to paying for the permit. I had the drawings that were included with the septic permit approval and had no reason to think that the location would have been changed. I was wary of writing the check given my experiences with the department on this project up to that point. I asked what would happen to the money if the permit was denied. I was specifically told that there is no way it would be denied and to go hire an engineer and not worry about it. Based on that, I spent almost$1000 that day. Also, had the responses been timely earlier in the process, an engineer would have never been necessary, and I would only be out$571. I would again like to request a refund of the permit fee. I would also like to request documentation of DCD time spent on the review for this project. The proposed structure was to include no plumbing and no electricity. It was to be a very simple structure. Even if the reviewers spent many hours on this (which does not seem necessary), no inspections were required as the permit was denied. It is my understanding that the fee I paid would have included those inspections. At least that was the case with the only other structure that I've ever built (my house that the pole barn was supposed to be placed next to). I strongly feel that the poor customer service I received from your department should be factored into your further consideration of my refund request. Jeff Jackman From: Jeff Jackman [mailto jell @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:32 PM To: 'csmith @co.jefferson.wa.us' Subject: BLD14-00471 1 • • Good Afternoon Carl, My name is Jeff Jackman and I built my future retirement home at 132 Alder Drive, Port Townsend in 2004. I live in Vancouver. I would like to relay to you my experience in attempting to obtain a building permit for a small pole building at that address. It started approximately one year ago. In February 2014, I stopped into the building department to ask what I needed to do to construct a pole building. I was given a handout for"Non-Engineered Pole Buildings". I reviewed the document and the various forms on your website and had a few questions, so I decided to call the DCD office. I made multiple calls over several days and someone finally got back to me. At that time I was told that if I wanted the county to answer any specific questions, I would need to submit a CAM form along with a check for$76. I completed the form and mailed the check on March 11, 2014. I heard nothing for several weeks. I again attempted to make contact and when I finally did, I was told that the CAM was never received (I know that this is not the case, as I have a record that the check was cashed by DCD). I was then advised to resubmit the CAM form along with a copy of the cancelled check. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. I finally made contact and spoke to David Johnson who then referred me to Frank B. We had a 5 minute conversation in which I was told that there are no issues, that I should move ahead, that I never should have submitted the CAM form in the first place, and that I would receive a refund. I never did receive a refund, despite inquiring about it several times since. I then completed the building permit application, the site plan, etc. on April 15. I had my neighbor hand deliver these documents to the DCD office as it very difficult for me to get to Port Townsend during the work week. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. At this point I made contact with Mary Blain and I asked her if she could look at the submittal and tell me if anything was missing. She said she couldn't find what was dropped off and suggested I email the documents for her review. She looked at what I sent and requested additional information and some changes to the plans. I made the requested changes right away and sent them back the same day. This was in July. Again, no response, so after a few calls, I emailed Mary again in September, with no response (I later learned that she was on maternity leave). Out of desperation, I hired a pole building contractor from Sequim to go to the DCD office and see what he could find out (it's now late October). The contractor was told that the plans need an engineers stamp and that the county does not have any provisions for prescriptive (non-engineered) pole buildings. Next(early November), I contacted Frank Benskin to try to clear up the engineering issue. Mr. Benskin was also unaware of any"non-engineered pole building" handout, but told me that Mary Blain was back and that I should talk to her. Mary also indicated that engineering would be required. I then sent her a copy of the handout(a copy of which she had already sent to me earlier in the process) and she agreed that it is applicable and that no engineering is necessary. She also said the revised plans look fine and that I should proceed. Based on my experience to that point, I decided I should wait until I could go to the office in person to finalize everything. I came in with multiple copies and sat down with Sally and Mary in December. I was then told that the county had revised the "non-engineered pole building" rules just a couple of weeks before, so now I'm back to needing an engineer. This was very unwelcome news as I had been trying to get approval for the better part of a year. They explained that since I hadn't yet paid the fee, the project is subject to the new requirements. I asked if they were sure that everything was in order except for the engineering. I wanted to know before I spent the money. I was assured that if I paid the permit fee and hired an engineer, all would be well and I would finally have my permit. I left the office and went directly to see an engineer. He did his work and submitted it to the county, in person, on my behalf. I didn't hear anything for a while, so I started leaving messages again. No response, but I did receive a letter from the Health Department. The site plan I submitted was based upon the septic design approved by the county. The letter sent to me the other day includes an "as built" site plan that is different than the design. This is the first time that I have ever seen this site plan. On the as-built, there is not enough room for the proposed pole building. As suggested in the Health Department letter, I contacted the septic installer. The installer told me that sometimes the as-built varies from the design and that there is nothing that can be done about it. So, in addition to spending a year trying to get this figured out, I have spent$76 on an apparently unnecessary CAM review(that was supposed to be refunded), $340 on engineering that I shouldn't have needed, and $571 on a permit that will never be issued. I have received incredibly poor customer service and conflicting information throughout the entire process. I realize that there is nothing that can be done about the money wasted on engineering, but I am requesting a refund of the $76 CAM fee and the $571 permit fee that I paid to DCD. I don't know if your department typically refunds any fees, but given my experience over the past year, it is more than appropriate in this case. This process has been a complete waste of hard earned money and a shockingly frustrating experience all around. 2 • • Jeff Jackman (503) 422-2675 3 • • no_ , d d d o O O d d d d O d c O o O o O o O o O o d O o 6 N U O O 0 0 0 0 (Do 0 0 0 0 • o N t` az x M Q aa)i a o .q W W W W W W � /4 C C "4 ( " t Q Ca Q o Q Ca z z z z z z z z z z z z a ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ w Z , I o 0 0 0 0 0 - - — w CC H 0 v O O O co co O . ! N Lc) N N N N Q V d- d' 7 7 7 0.t.. O O ':O ''O O .d N N N N N yN Cr • r■ <4 N N N N N N O t"-• 0' N N N N N N 40 _ O TS O O O O O O O O O O 'O • . I - N i • C4 4 �• C r, O O O O O O • r 1 O O, Od Vi O O ^_ Sz+.... N 01. ^Et N( t� in U,; w 0 o esF" O. •0? 0) 0 v U P4 CO w -� CA• .�a. . W U c g. i-1 .. co co 777---111 (c$ 0'. a P, U 00 00 W O O co co 0 co M - O d' 'n oo mai: M CN 'd" �. �.. 00 00 00. 00 00: M: M M M M M° Ch CA Ch O M N O M N O M N' O M N O M' rl- O M A _ _ _d _ d \115 me, c) LL N N N' N N. N R 0 U U H a a, U vs CO U • • Sally Ellis From: Carl Smith Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:39 AM To: Sally Ellis Subject: Jeff Jackman I informed Mr.Jackman in a phone call made 3/20/15 of the decision to refund $70.00. for a portion of the base fee not used for building inspections. Carl Carl Smith,AICP Director, Department of Community Development Jefferson County 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 V: 360-379-4493 F: 360-379-4451 csmith@co.jefferson.wa.us www.cajefferson.wa.us `-,A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of We in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. 1 i Sally Ellis From: Carl Smith Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:36 AM To: Sally Ellis Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 FYI From: Carl Smith Sent:Tuesday, February 03, 2015 4:56 PM To:#DCDStaff Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 FYI. I will reply to him to apologize for his disappointing experience here. I know most customers have a much better experience. Carl From:Jeff Jackman [mailto:Jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:32 PM To: Carl Smith Subject: BLD14-00471 Good Afternoon Carl, My name is Jeff Jackman and I built my future retirement home at 132 Alder Drive, Port Townsend in 2004. I live in Vancouver. I would like to relay to you my experience in attempting to obtain a building permit for a small pole building at that address. It started approximately one year ago. In February 2014, I stopped into the building department to ask what I needed to do to construct a pole building. I was given a handout for"Non-Engineered Pole Buildings". I reviewed the document and the various forms on your website and had a few questions, so I decided to call the DCD office. I made multiple calls over several days and someone finally got back to me. At that time I was told that if I wanted the county to answer any specific questions, I would need to submit a CAM form along with a check for$76. I completed the form and mailed the check on March 11, 2014. I heard nothing for several weeks. I again attempted to make contact and when I finally did, I was told that the CAM was never received (I know that this is not the case, as I have a record that the check was cashed by DCD). I was then advised to resubmit the CAM form along with a copy of the cancelled check. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. I finally made contact and spoke to David Johnson who then referred me to Frank B. We had a 5 minute conversation in which I was told that there are no issues, that I should move ahead, that I never should have submitted the CAM form in the first place, and that I would receive a refund. I never did receive a refund, despite inquiring about it several times since. I then completed the building permit application, the site plan, etc. on April 15. I had my neighbor hand deliver these documents to the DCD office as it very difficult for me to get to Port Townsend during the work week. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. At this point I made contact with Mary Blain and I asked her if she could look at the submittal and tell me if anything was missing. She said she couldn't find what was dropped off and suggested I email the documents for her review. She looked at what I sent and requested additional information and some changes to the plans. I made the requested changes right away and sent them back the same day. This was in July. Again, no response, so after a few calls, I emailed Mary again in September, with no response (I later learned that she was on maternity leave). Out of desperation, I hired a pole building contractor from Sequim to go to the DCD office and see what he could find out (it's now late October). The contractor was told that the plans need an engineers stamp and that the county does not have any provisions for prescriptive (non-engineered) pole buildings. Next(early November), I contacted Frank Benskin to try to clear up the engineering issue. Mr. Benskin was also unaware of any"non-engineered pole building" handout, but told me that Mary Blain was back and that I should talk to her. Mary also indicated that engineering would be required. I then sent her a copy of the handout(a copy of which she had already sent to me earlier in the process) and 1 • • she agreed that it is applicable and that no engineering is necessary. She also said the revised plans look fine and that I should proceed. Based on my experience to that point, I decided I should wait until I could go to the office in person to finalize everything. I came in with multiple copies and sat down with Sally and Mary in December. I was then told that the county had revised the"non-engineered pole building" rules just a couple of weeks before, so now I'm back to needing an engineer. This was very unwelcome news as I had been trying to get approval for the better part of a year. They explained that since I hadn't yet paid the fee, the project is subject to the new requirements. I asked if they were sure that everything was in order except for the engineering. I wanted to know before I spent the money. I was assured that if I paid the permit fee and hired an engineer, all would be well and I would finally have my permit. I left the office and went directly to see an engineer. He did his work and submitted it to the county, in person, on my behalf. I didn't hear anything for a while, so I started leaving messages again. No response, but I did receive a letter from the Health Department. The site plan I submitted was based upon the septic design approved by the county. The letter sent to me the other day includes an "as built" site plan that is different than the design. This is the first time that I have ever seen this site plan. On the as-built, there is not enough room for the proposed pole building. As suggested in the Health Department letter, I contacted the septic installer. The installer told me that sometimes the as-built varies from the design and that there is nothing that can be done about it. So, in addition to spending a year trying to get this figured out, I have spent$76 on an apparently unnecessary CAM review(that was supposed to be refunded), $340 on engineering that I shouldn't have needed, and $571 on a permit that will never be issued. I have received incredibly poor customer service and conflicting information throughout the entire process. I realize that there is nothing that can be done about the money wasted on engineering, but I am requesting a refund of the $76 CAM fee and the $571 permit fee that I paid to DCD. I don't know if your department typically refunds any fees, but given my experience over the past year, it is more than appropriate in this case. This process has been a complete waste of hard earned money and a shockingly frustrating experience all around. Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 2 • Sally Ellis From: Carl Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 4:56 PM To: #DCDStaff Subject: FW: BLD14-00471 FYI. I will reply to him to apologize for his disappointing experience here. I know most customers have a much better experience. Carl From:Jeff Jackman [mailto:jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent:Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:32 PM To: Carl Smith Subject: BLD14-00471 Good Afternoon Carl, My name is Jeff Jackman and I built my future retirement home at 132 Alder Drive, Port Townsend in 2004. I live in Y Y Vancouver. I would like to relay to you my experience in attempting to obtain a building permit for a small pole building at that address. It started approximately one year ago. In February 2014, I stopped into the building department to ask what I needed to do to construct a pole building. I was given a handout for"Non-Engineered Pole Buildings". I reviewed the document and the various forms on your website and had a few questions, so I decided to call the DCD office. I made multiple calls over several days and someone finally got back to me. At that time I was told that if I wanted the county to answer any specific questions, I would need to submit a CAM form along with a check for$76. I completed the form and mailed the check on March 11, 2014. I heard nothing for several weeks. I again attempted to make contact and when I finally did, I was told that the CAM was never received (I know that this is not the case, as I have a record that the check was cashed by DCD). I was then advised to resubmit the CAM form along with a copy of the cancelled check. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. I finally made contact and spoke to David Johnson who then referred me to Frank B. We had a 5 minute conversation in which I was told that there are no issues, that I should move ahead, that I never should have submitted the CAM form in the first place, and that I would receive a refund. I never did receive a refund, despite inquiring about it several times since. I then completed the building permit application, the site plan, etc. on April 15. I had my neighbor hand deliver these documents to the DCD office as it very difficult for me to get to Port Townsend during the work week. Again, I heard nothing for several weeks, so I started calling again. At this point I made contact with Mary Blain and I asked her if she could look at the submittal and tell me if anything was missing. She said she couldn't find what was dropped off and suggested I email the documents for her review. She looked at what I sent and requested additional information and some changes to the plans. I made the requested changes right away and sent them back the same day. This was in July. Again, no response, so after a few calls, I emailed Mary again in September, with no response(I later learned that she was on maternity leave). Out of desperation, I hired a pole building contractor from Sequim to go to the DCD office and see what he could find out (it's now late October). The contractor was told that the plans need an engineers stamp and that the county does not have any provisions for prescriptive(non-engineered) pole buildings. Next(early November), I contacted Frank Benskin to try to clear up the engineering issue. Mr. Benskin was also unaware of any"non-engineered pole building" handout, but told me that Mary Blain was back and that I should talk to her. Mary also indicated that engineering would be required. I then sent her a copy of the handout(a copy of which she had already sent to me earlier in the process) and she agreed that it is applicable and that no engineering is necessary. She also said the revised plans look fine and that I should proceed. Based on my experience to that point, I decided I should wait until I could go to the office in person to finalize everything. I came in with multiple copies and sat down with Sally and Mary in December. I was then told that the county had revised the"non-engineered pole building" rules just a couple of weeks before, so now I'm back to needing an engineer. This was very unwelcome news as I had been trying to get approval for the better part of a year. They explained that since I hadn't yet paid the fee, the project is subject to the new requirements. I asked if they were sure that 1 i everything was in order except for the engineering. I wanted to know before I spent the money. I was assured that if I paid the permit fee and hired an engineer, all would be well and I would finally have my permit. I left the office and went directly to see an engineer. He did his work and submitted it to the county, in person, on my behalf. I didn't hear anything for a while, so I started leaving messages again. No response, but I did receive a letter from the Health Department. The site plan I submitted was based upon the septic design approved by the county. The letter sent to me the other day includes an "as built" site plan that is different than the design. This is the first time that I have ever seen this site plan. On the as-built, there is not enough room for the proposed pole building. As suggested in the Health Department letter, I contacted the septic installer. The installer told me that sometimes the as-built varies from the design and that there is nothing that can be done about it. So, in addition to spending a year trying to get this figured out, I have spent$76 on an apparently unnecessary CAM review(that was supposed to be refunded), $340 on engineering that I shouldn't have needed, and $571 on a permit that will never be issued. I have received incredibly poor customer service and conflicting information throughout the entire process. I realize that there is nothing that can be done about the money wasted on engineering, but I am requesting a refund of the$76 CAM fee and the $571 permit fee that I paid to DCD. I don't know if your department typically refunds any fees, but given my experience over the past year, it is more than appropriate in this case. This process has been a complete waste of hard earned money and a shockingly frustrating experience all around. Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 2 0 � -., r— � f L :^ E 11 `�i i i-.= r. ---Alder Drive--- 1 '? i �� iv i II I 1 i , 1 °- `I l :-. J ;Pr !This'.,';:)rj,nFNT F. a> k /I I > ��. • I 45 ./ I i (25' setback from Alder Drive) 1 aS// 4-- C ► 1AJ/ St ► / N •i /' house I / 8 I in 1 / ► i t 1 // ti I O 1 / I 1 / U f O 1 N • N w I r t U o __ as ► = m I I ' •I N 3 m 1 �\ I v> a c a X23 �.` septic tanks I `,`-' �J septic line \ ■ 1 e° °c .c �� , I(Ta o C .05 m-o Qo �• I a� m i Glendon 7_,(''.N 1 30, module P.al C ._ V ► o m 30' down-slope I i protection area 1 3 """F i ,/ , • 1 ► proposed �., i .-14 ? ', pole Glendon / barn module 1 1 = ``)qz . 30 - - I i 30' down-slope I i protection area I ifl 1 5 setback A4ROVED ,- 84' ► SITE PLAN Site Address: 132 Alder Drive VT Parcel Number: 940800057 JAN - 1 2% 0' 8' 16' Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom l I ( Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503) 422-2675 104 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY Scale DEPT.OF CQ11-IMUNITYDEVELOPMEPT 31 CJ1 J2-t'f a tct:_( 1,r"v., ,- }t:_. .„- Li-- Standard Conditions for Residentidi Development in Jefferson County 1. LIGHTING: Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT: The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 3. OUTDOOR STORAGE: Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard_ 4. UNLICENSED VEHICLES: Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC_ Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 5. PARKING: A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 6. This permit has been reviewed consistent with JCC 18.40.130 & 140. Notice: this permit does not excuse the applicant from complying with other local, state and federal ordinances, regulations or statues, applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Future development beyond that specified in this permit shall require further review. 7. BMPs: The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine 2013-03-07 SFR_StdConditions 3/7/2013 1 —P Cii-anp:itt. _ 4 / Hialf-31---; fr 4 ,-----Catch Ba5-in ---- / (Yerci Drain\ ,7 f------, , i / / ///- I — ut. .... Doigtpod -----z-_..---,.. 0 DRY WELL . 48 Irch Dia weer Hole Fillet-iv/oh . PLAN VIEIN . iik-34 Wast-e3 . \ ' DrAndAin ,' - - . NTS . .. • „---R if Do*kz11.sF,01.1 • / r--Melt C eller of Hole wiih t 0.1..rved Rik Ho t. .m. Cter resns Topscil— l FitzliwithSulti.ce ----,t""‘e:%1 I 6 l ' / .- I I ii, neweat ... p8 4, 1- - --'--":=1..,..1,=_'; , -- ;.....i..*- ,• ----------__ a 1=-, ---!-- ~-1.: --- ',..'F',.*14:1 ---)” • -----=.--- —U451CritAttik:grrEM,_., 211:4, liq ....,-1 '-,. ;,,A•, ,o; r... !kr',JIM°a. -mitt04414 C t.Ch BaSin 11 • 'Intet 4.,&LAfte, • •,•, ct •Mk,.,u,,..„ :tx • .4--NO • • la ('li§.1d Dreiri) rft '%. i. I % ei,'"'Ireh D- riPtpr -, 4)mh i .,7, , 31 ,,... , i, - sides of Hole—, ., Hole Filled wit) Lined with t: 1112-Tlikia$1.-ted - 1 Filta N7iri c.: !+,1 Drain B o.1.-,3 a DRY WELL High-:_§..-mmd-watarTablo SECTION t NTS Figure 3.1.4-Typical Downspout Infiltration Drywell Source: King County Volume iii-Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs-August 2012 3-9 } Drywells Gene 1. Drywell bottoms must be a minimum of 1 foot above seasonal high ground water level or impermeable soil layers. 2. When located in course sands and cobbles, drywells must contain a volume of gravel equal to or greater than 60 cubic feet per 1000 square feet of impervious surface served.When located in medium sands, drywells must contain at least 90 cubic feet of gravel per 1,000 square feet of impervious surface served. 3. Drywells must be at least 48 inches in diameter(minimum)and deep enough to contain the gravel amounts specified above for the soil type and impervious surface served. 4. Filter fabric(geotextile)must be placed on top of the drain rock and on trench or drywell sides prior to backfilling. 5. Spacing between drywells must be a minimum of 10 feet. 6. Downspout infiltration drywells must not be built on slopes greater than 25% (4:1). Drywells may not be placed on or above a landslide hazard area or on slopes greater than 15%without evaluation by a professional engineer with geotechnical expertise or a licensed geologist,hydrogeologist, or engineering geologist, and with • jurisdiction approval. • Volume III—Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs—August 2012 3-6 • • . \ ,-.''''' rT'- l, ,7- ___ R\ ,r\ E , \v !■ -- , \ ---Alder Drive--- j;, !Ili 4- 95' ---/ L 1 3 1 0 1L--j 1 , , 1 1 >, m 1-. 1 a) il 1 > D 1 / i 1 (25 setback from Alder Drive) - / 6„,-;c•/. -4-- .....r. -/ 2 44 0 I / alS • / I DI a) • / house 1 / I in 1 / I 1 , I 1 1 i / .// co II I I I I b co 11. I co _o b co I a) co 0 I 0 a) •.- I as N,septic tanks r) I er) i cp 0_ 0 co 1 I I 74 (3) septic line I (D 0 1 \ 6 , i e a.) c,2 _ 3 I a> 2 as I % Glendon . , Plal - = .7, a) I cr) c module \...i .111r I _i crs 0 X I -E CD c 30' down-slope A, gaisiF 0 1 1 protection area 1 ... .......,_. 1 i • I proposed 1 • igleSrpole Glendon •1 barn I I 30' module i . 1 f(5e Z' .1 I 30'down-slope I / 1 protection area I 1 (A I • I 1- 5'setback A PPROVED - , .. _, SITE PLAN Site Address: 132 Alder Drive Parcel Number: 940800057 JAN - 0' 8' 16' Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom 414,. II, IIIII Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 ‘4.4 JEFFERSON COUNTY Scale stgEF: CO,NLMUNITY VELOPMEKI” ---(....-4 L-c- ' • Standard Conditions for Residentldi Development in Jefferson County 1. LIGHTING: Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT: The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 3. OUTDOOR STORAGE: Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard_ 4. UNLICENSED VEHICLES: Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 5. PARKING: A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 6. This permit has been reviewed consistent with JCC 18.40.130 & 140. Notice: this permit does not excuse the applicant from complying with other local, state and federal ordinances, regulations or statues, applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Future development beyond that specified in this permit shall require further review. 7. BMPs: The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine 2013-03-07 SFR_StdConditions 3/7/2013 1 • Fisheries Service can levy pei ales. Portions of Jefferson County, inclu .,ig marine waters, are included as "critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(118th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take"occurs_ Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013-09-06_SFR_StdConditions 9/6/2013 . . /1 D UV nv:Iti, HOI3e, i) ,e—Catch B-8.$in ,-- ./--- (Vaal Drain) / ,-- --, --„,_ Dorrepott -----zz-_-_-__ o DRY WELL 410-31-1 Dit:k rfetzr - ,,- Hole Fiiied wit) PLAN VIEW lte2-3'''WaShFd - Drain Rot* . •. NTS --B Tit Domf1131;0a tr—‘''llierlthf'tC"elOrwr e°:fiHRall? Ho Lts9 „,---LN,vilow or OttPr treens 1 - - - A\-„, 7-SF:lash Block Topscil—„, = Fl Lzhw MI Strface i 1 ? t -1 \ i = I ,tt Ili ,A- -,- I •'L. . 1 1 , RAltriADI eat II- - .,7 I -,".-- , , —e 1 Min. 1 Fine tilez,f-i Svr --- RIC P ir_e 6.t.;:k°447:;:tirrk:Pi::*ireR„,,7114.11 .. ",,, • -411611 0, iAliet Cetth Basin ---i-aa .r, 4?rrl S3 of Hole 114:,.: *3!nth Dia mter 1! ' l'a- Hole Filled wilt) Lined;,t,tith t, lik-a"vaztred ....., Filta Febn=:: li, Drain Rock 15 ctliq. ,.... .4. 16440° .4 etttt 4. NI Ira, 1)410:-..019-1,= Ana I DRY WELL H ia-h Gr,,luctdwatar Tabl9 SECTION NTS Figure 3.1.4-Typical Downspout infiltration Drywell Source: King County Volume III-Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs-August 2012 3-9 1 1110 Setbe Local governments may require specific setbacks in sites with slopes over 40%,land slide areas,open water features, springs, wells, and septic tank drain fields. Adequate room for maintenance access and equipment should also be considered. Examples of setbacks commonly used include the following: 1. All infiltration systems should be at least 10 feet from any structure, property line, or sensitive area(except slopes over 40%). 2. All infiltration systems must be at least 50 feet from the top of any slope over 40%.This setback may be reduced to 15 feet based on a geotechnical evaluation,but in no instances may it be less than the buffer width. 3. For sites with septic systems, infiltration systems must be downgradient of the drainfiield unless the site topography clearly prohibits subsurface flows from intersecting the drainfield. Volume 111—Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs—August 2012 3-10 Drywells Genes 1. Drywell bottoms must be a minimum of 1 foot above seasonal high ground water level or impermeable soil layers. 2. When located in course sands and cobbles, drywells must contain a volume of gravel equal to or greater than 60 cubic feet per 1000 square feet of impervious surface served.When located in medium sands, drywells must contain at least 90 cubic feet of gravel per 1,000 square feet of impervious surface served. 3. Drywells must be at least 48 inches in diameter(minimum)and deep enough to contain the gravel amounts specified above for the soil type and impervious surface served_ 4. Filter fabric (geotextile)must be placed on top of the drain rock and on trench or drywell sides prior to backfilling. 5. Spacing between drywells must be a minimum of 10 feet. 6. Downspout infiltration drywells must not be built on slopes greater than 25% (4:1). Drywells may not be placed on or above a landslide hazard area or on slopes greater than 15%without evaluation by a professional engineer with geotechnical expertise or a licensed geologist,hydrogeologist, or engineering geologist, and with • jurisdiction approval. • Volume III—Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs—August 2012 3-6 BLD14-00471 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Review Type: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD14-00471 Received Date: 12/30/2014 SITE ADDRESS: 132 ALDER DR PORT TOWNSEND, 98368 OWNER: JEFFREY JACKMAN PHONE: 503-422-2675 SHELLY STROM 415 W MCLOUGHLIN BLVD VANCOUVER WA 98660-2511 9408 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 940800057 Section: 13 Township: 30 N Range: 2V1 CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: FRED ESSON PHONE: 360-531-0589 PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEW POLE BUILDING NO HEAT- NO STORAGE SEP03-00101 TYPE OF WORK GAR SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 8,700.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: UH CODE EDITION: 2012 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: 448 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: Prop: Total: Total: Routing Date: Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $146.00 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Plan Check $94.90 SRE 12/29/14 154005 State Building Code $4.50 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Total: $245.40 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_App_Bld.rpt 12/30/2014 • • ---Alder Drive--- , i i' - N 1 . o •ti'... 1 it ir-;„ , I �R c�,.._.:, ., : ‘. ,. .. , L.I j co (25' setback from Alder Drive) . r._._ ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ _._.;P,'. YI J 1 - 1 .._ .n I N i house ! 1 to 1 co I ! .; j 1 a I I a N I o I 1 E i- I co \/- ---T--- I ro N I __7 I ,a o j �.�^ \, septic tanks ! to j 3 r°)� septic line • ! -ti ArN I j ! (14”eave a overhang,gutters at, �� • I north and south Q° \ j (sides,drain to grass I surface) Glendon I j module ! I :A/ 3o i ! ' 30' down-slope ! I ! protection area I I I , I I proposed •I 14'x30 pole Glendon I barn module 7 I 30' down-slope I protection area I 1 I !6 l a r% 5' setback i Site Address: 132 Alder Drive Parcel Number: 940800057 0' 8' 16' Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom II I I I Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 INP Scale Area=420 sq.ft. Truss span=14' Post Spacing=10'0/C Post height=9'-12'above grade Corner posts=6x6 PT for ground contact Side posts=6x8 PT for ground contact T C PIT I.1� 4l II LlL\ C� ' 1 O L7 } J 1- L1 r- 0' 2' 4' Post Spacing Plan I I I 132 Alder Drive Scale • 0 ‘-sto‘t--k --(-47, - I ti ,- ► ,�1 ::: ,:W :,_ E :ILI RSO COUNTY r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY a VELOPME k` 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368;Web:w wi.co effers', a s�com 'dR e o merit -,/-11 ii,• Tel.360 379.4450 i Fax 360 379 4451 I Email:dcd ;co.iefferson wa us� �014 'i t;ii 7( Permits s (�.iF�f v, S -J.0 C� merit C( iS rst P G%Review EV � Long Range Planning ft th=f' r i if fVai�t7 Sf7�e �'Iy�YG� t Master Permit Application MLA: ,1. � hlY�ni[t�t-irne.tE T Lr �' i(; Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary). 14'x31'pole building for boat storage 1,3 p r EAT ^ 1,, t`3 j#i-E2 — Tax Parcel Number: 940800057 Property Size: 1/4 acre (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 32 Alder Drive.Port Townsend y Property Owner(s)of Record: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom Telephone:503-422-2675 Fax: 503-224-0449 email: left @pointsourcesolutions-cool Mailing Address: 415 W.McLoughlin By.Vancouver.WA 98660 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): i( Telephone: 5c v 7 a5� Fax: email: Mailing Address What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies 0 Lot or Road Segregation r3Building ❑Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Demolition Permit C Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) C Single Family ®Garage Attached/Detached C Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CJ** C Manufactured Home C Modular ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification C Commercial* C Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** C Change of Use C Boundary Line Adjustment C Address C Road Approach C Short Plat** C Home Business E Cottage Industry C Binding Site Plan** C Propane C Long Plat** C Sign C Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** CC Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis C Plat Vacation/Alteration** C Stormwater Management Er Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** C Site Plan Approval Advance Determination.(SPAAD)* C Shoreline Management Substantial Development** C Temporary Use C Shoreline Management Variance C Wireless Telecommunication* C Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment C Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium C Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre-Application Conference C Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate }-t"e,t.i L-') 4. ,' to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE * **- - , Date: d 4f f By signing this application f. ,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein.and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,iudgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required -ter inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the application 4 he or s ants prior notice. Signature: . ' ✓,% a. L�-^-_--- Date: - /` The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you ar in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferabt nsibilitt fir ad erng to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: - 4'eff /Gel 6 ` Date: 11 /0-i • BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein.that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assumin. e respar}tsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project_ Signature: I' ,G `' " _ Date: ''fl'Ft r`l GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: Jeff Jackman (503•4$2-2675 (503-234-0449 MAILING ADDRESS: 415 W.McLoughlin BY,Vancouver,WA 98660 EMAIL: jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE (503-42-2675 FAX:(503-234-0449 MAILING ADDRESS: 415 W,fvicLoughiin Bv.Vancouver.WA 98660 EMAIL jeff @pointsourcesolutions.corn Type: Type:T e: Frame T e: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: New I Wood Existing: None - Sewer Addition - Steel Proposed: None Bank - Community System Alteration/Remodel _ Concrete Total: 0 Height: I individual System I Repair - Masonry SEP Permit# no plumbing Demolition i_ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: None Setback: I Private well I Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: None _ Public Total: 0 N . ! I I \\ .r If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: l Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA ParliirpgSpaces: ?I I Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed! i ��jj rr 9 201, IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? 'Yes i NO- J If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance installation permit,mark all items below that apply: - 1L") Underground Tank Above ground tank Size of Propane Tank: ;.; UiJIY Heat Stove Cook Stove Woodstove Fireplace.nsert rehtO evotS telleP i .knaT retaW+tgt F,'.-.'*1.1.i 11 IY Df`JELI P��ENT Is this appliance beinq installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, Including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH Bid App Review: co 0 73-9 2nd Floor Heated Consistency Review: Db Other Heated Base fee: lye cx° Mezzanine Additional Section: U 0 — Heated Basement Plan Check fee. Tj, i '1 0 Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: CD y'C Other Unheated 1 Pot Water Review fee: Garage/Carport SUBTOTAL 4 Decks 911/Rd Approach fee: Other 0 TOTAL: $ '-4-I .V O Receipt Number: 1C r`0v ✓ Cash/Check Number: 1 '4c2D ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: 1.2./ii� I L� .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish $3500 Initials: o',2 s.,got_ Sq6' - ' o \ ' O-b— ,°\ \V fat ‘c I • • . . �'�`y`U JEFFERSON COUNTY l�r- �` , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I DEC L 9 �Q�4 t I ,� / 621 Sheridan Street •Port Townsend • Washington 98368 , uiuiti \-\,.`,4 r0,f 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax ;LII I '')Y Dc t/ru 'r _� >, http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment' - NT Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MIA# PROJEf'TiRPPLlCRNT NAME: ,X- -4. s,..t.-Kw�.:ilk /? fr. I�v'1 d(ut) DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,""medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITEI Size of parcel Vs.( acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 1 il J�- sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded.filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert%acres or more of Construction site for structures 5Le sglft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes - Well,utilities,etc. so/ft Does the project convert 2 1 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking,roads,etc. &Ot sj ti. c; w( sq/ft Circle: Yes thl -'' Lawn,landscaping,etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 11 0 Cs sq/ft Cut Fill (cu/yd) [over) stormwater calc worksheet—REV 11,1/2013 • i --- 1 � - I j I , r r, Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as un t riatutaC L orMt is .1 prior to development A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow ;V from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to root tops, walkways, patios, driveways. parking lots or storage areas. concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed eerth'rr(,'t1 tt i and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. t t ':i1ii,i ly 1,lFL OPMEp,1T STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) a(C' sq/ft Structures(all roof area) t(,try • sq/ft Sidewalks sq'ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios _ sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc F,- .-t i,. sq/ft Driveway,parking,roads.etc "3ei e-..14‘,..ii- sq/ft 3 c; 9,- .-E. Other sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New 11 l:Cr sq/ft Total Existing , 2.3 2 L" sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING Is sq/ft This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: Z t Does the site have 35%or more of existinq impervious surface? Circle: Yes 11.0% FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no,the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management- DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of `small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet. I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. f (LA4/p)ER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) IFOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM LARGE REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No stormwater calc worksheet—REV.1111/2013 ■ 11 Front Parcel Review �� _ 2--n Parcel 940800057 Printed: December 30, 2014 JEFFREY JACKMAN Site Address(es): SHELLY STROM 132 ALDER DR PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 415 W MCLOUGHLIN BLVD VANCOUVER,WA 98660-2511 Parcel Number: 940800057 S-T-R: 13-30N-2W Total Acreage 0 Legal Description CAPE GEORGE VILLAGE DIV 4 LOT 58 Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 2 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: School District 50 Zoning: ?....say,- COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: \ S COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lin,_Qpzsukmitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property ES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES No� [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: YES [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES 0 Stream Type:YES —. FWHCA: YES NIA Wetlands: YES OOP Rare Plants:YES ay Seismic: YES i Landslide: YES ie Flood: YES • Erosion: YES !f�'J� Aquifer Rec 1 ,e Area:YES TO j SIPZ: non-. At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Modera 'iskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan itted: Ye•ilrt'/ [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Land IJ : f Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding J g [ ] Mineral Lands: YES [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO ...6)[ ] No Shooting Zone: YES N [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface I I 1p® Sqf Land Disturbing Activity I I C)OSV ESA's [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:: Req YES l�thru#5 o MRLin YES #1 0 #10 Forest Lands No [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes 115W [ ] Parking Spaces Re ed NO 2 Other F 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard 1* M.(51/nr cA).- U L g © C.0-b-4: frt- 4 (� _ , ,,,,,,,t,„ _ , , 4: • . 6-tk. A V [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: '3 2°/6 plc� l l� I (TC Resource Lands&Public: 10% ural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: UDC Se .7 --,�D_ _�,-___ e- Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage: 60%in Rural Industri ds only ('�J [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: d r Left Side: c5 1 Right Side: ' Rear: 5 1 Shoreline Setback: 1J/,,A LSHA Setback: (\;IA [ ] Road Classification: "T f'Nctk Road Approach: EXISTING No T _ REO'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT kkj q C 19 1 - 1 i - CO (Z)( [ ] Flood Certificate: t■,)/A [ ] Existing Case(s) & Copdition(s): 1.-12.1).-! _st i-Q -A-Li Violations: Yes o [ ] Recorded Date of Su division: AULlus-}-26, 1t4AFN /2S q F5 • � Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: 7)(7k <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES Q submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YESTOi,) submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES No parcel tags found for parcel Cases Associated with APN 940800057 Review Cases Name Type Status Planner BLD14-00471 JACKMAN P Application Received: 12/30/2014 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: NEW POLE BUILDING NU HEAT-NO STORAGE SEP03-00101 CAM14-00215 JACKMAN NA M David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 4/11/2014 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/11/2014 Case Finaled: Building questions on proposed pole building. M LA04-00221 BLD04-00262 MLA04-00221 JACKMAN I F Greg Ballard Application Received: 4/21/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/19/2004 Case Finaled: 3/31/2010 NEW SFR OTH02-00020 ERICKSON F Application Received: 12/13/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 5/2/2003 WET SEASON EVALUATION PRJ04-00099 ERICKSON A Application Received: 4/21/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SEP03-00101 ERICKSON F Application Received: 4/24/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/15/2003 Case Finaled: 3/5/2010 SOM03-00101 ERICKSON RCR Application Received: 6/2/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/10/2014 Case Finaled: \\tidemark\data\forms\R_Parcel_CRMLA.rpt 12/30/2014 Page 2 of 2 • t 1i BLD14-00471 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA N Review Type: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD14-00471 Received Date: 12/30/2014 SITE ADDRESS: 132 ALDER DR PORT TOWNSEND, 98368 OWNER: JEFFREY JACKMAN PHONE: 503-422-2675 SHELLY STROM 415 W MCLOUGHLIN BLVD VANCOUVER WA 98660-2511 9408 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 940800057 Section: 13 Township: 30 N Range: 2V■ CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: FRED ESSON PHONE: 360-531-0589 PROJECT DESCRIPTIOri NEW POLE BUILDING NO HEAT- NO STORAGE SEP03-00101 TYPE OF WORK GAR SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 8,700.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: UH CODE EDITION: 2012 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: 448 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ALT WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: Prop: Total: Total: Routing Date: Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $146.00 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Plan Check $94.90 SRE 12/29/14 154005 State Building Code $4.50 SRE 12/29/14 154005 Total: $245.40 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_App_Bid.rpt 12/30/2014 • Lm k • tl C ) �i ,ii trr y tip v1 E Ls Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description. include separate sheets as necessary 14'x3d' pole building for boat storage 1,,1© I-}EA j No ea_ — Tax parcel Number 940800057 Property Size: 1/4 acre (acres square feet) Site Address and,or Directions to Property:132 Alder Drive,Port Townsend Property Owner(s)of Record: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom Telephone:503422-2675 Fax: 503-224-0449 email: ietr @po r tsourcesoiutions.corr Mailing Address: 415 W.McLoughlin Be.Vancouver.WA 98660 t Applicant/Agent(if different from owner,): r( C\ E-5s Telephone: -c'O J J 7 d 1 Fax: email: Mailing Address. What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies Lot or Road Segregation RBuilding E Critical Areas Stewardship Plan Demolition Permit a Variance(Minor.Major or Reasonable Economic Use) Single Family r Garage Attached:'Detached Conditional Use[C(a).C(d).or Cl** Manufactured Home E Modular ❑Discretionary 'D"or Unnamed Use Classification E. Commercial* El Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** Change of Use Boundary Line Adjustment = Address =Road Approach E Short Plat** Home Business `Cottage industry El Binding Site Plan"* -Propane Long Plat'* El Sign E Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** Allowed"Yes Use Consistency Analysis Ti Plat Vacation/Alteration** Stormwater Management E Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** Site Plan Approval Advance Determination.(SPAAD)* 17 Shoreline Management Substantial Development** Temporary Use Shoreline Management Variance =Wireless Telecommunication* Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment E.Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium El Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre-Application Conference C'Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal,if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate f"et_t, l-' " ' -- to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s) / OW 1/ OWNER SIGNATURE ' J .�L= - Date: r 41 /` MEI By signing this application fo ,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein.and in any attachments.is true and correct to the best of his.her or its knowledge. Any materal falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. further agree to save.indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities.judgments.court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or r consequence of the granting of this permit, i further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees.representatives or agents for the sole purpose of appl:cation review and any required -ter inspections. Staff's access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the application it he or s ,ants prior notice. Signature: J ' e �u^--"' Date: 4 it- The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one cr more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take'of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the `Endangered Species Act'or ESA"Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can fie a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you ar in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he.she or it holds individual and non-transferabl nsibilit r adJ�ering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: < �1 G.e `� Date: [ / y`/ • 0 r 1 BUILDER STATEMENT The s;crer of this statement toes herecy certify that they are the Owners cf the parcel referenced herein that they are not licensed contractors and that All l Le assumin• e resporysiaiity of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: f' l G '' Date' `It if i'1 GENERAL CON-RACT.-DR OR MANU=4CTi.;REC;HOME INSTALLER. P,-,CNE: FAX: Jeff Jackman (5'33-422 2575 (503-244-0449 MAILING ADDRESS: 415 W.McLoughlin By.Vancouver,WA 98660 Ey`''i jell @pointsourcesoiutions.com CONTRACTORS LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT ENGINEER P CNE (503-42-2575 FAX:(503-2V-0449 MAILING ADDRESS: 415 W.h1cLcughiin By.Vancouver WA 08660 EMAIL_ jeffr pointsourcesolutions corn Project Type: Frame Type: ! Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: I. New Wood Existing: None = Sewer Addition - Steel Proposed: None Bank - Community System Aiteration(Remodel ii Concrete Total: D Height: I Individual System I Repair _ Masonry SEP Permit# no plumbing Bedrooms: Water Supply: Demolition _ Other: pp y' None Setback: I Private wet - Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: None Public Total: o N me.ot If this is a Commercial Protect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parting Spaces: I Number of occupants(includes owners.tenants,employees.etc) Current Proposed r-r: 2 9 ,,,,,a IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes i KO '- i J If this is a Propane Tank andfor Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: -- . Underground Tank Above ground tank. Size of Propane Tank: h� Heat Stove Cook Stove Woodstove Fireplace.nsert rehtO ' evotS telleP i 'knaT retaWtot i r.rjv pi.;i t-1 i°MVNyj Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured I Mobile Home? Yes I No When applying for a permit to Install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, Including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH Bid App Review oo 2n Floor Heated .. Review: _) " i ( % Other Heated Base fee: ( � C Cl Mezzanine - Additional Section: .U o Heated Basement Plan Check fee: CV—1 i Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: o Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee GaragelCarport . 4 _ _ 1 SUBTOTAL V11 511 s4 0 Decks " 911 1Rd Approach fee' T Other r} TOTAL: $ ,*1--' .qO— Receipt Number: 0C Cash/Check Number: 2C ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: C- L T— 'Fair market value of ail labor and marerals foundation to finish $3500 _ Initials: ,. _ 1 �; C 1L'e \\%iC.)1 ', ir f • • L r JEFFERSON COUNTY �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i jI L ;` R, 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Wasningtor.98368 i c�� 360/379-4450 • 363/379-4451 Fax _ ",rr�T `..____INCt___-- http,,,N vw.co.jeffe--sor.wa.us-commdeve•.opment� v --- Stormwater Calculation Worksheet :n�.;, -.__H ,,,r NWE. ,F-i- ,)._4t<.v++c.vl/?t•Ir. i3,, 1 ti onfi DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small.' `medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stomiwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application. building permit application. or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan.if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel acres An acre contains 43.560 square feet Multiply the acreage by this figure Size of parcel in square feet 1 ti,;c sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth. or a change in the existing soil cover/both vegetative and non-vegetative's and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling. excavation. and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar.alder,big-leaf maple.and vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry, salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION, AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared.graded.filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for. Does the project convert'/.acres or more of Construction site for structures `yL'Q sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank, etc._ __ sq/ft Circle: Yes 6.9 Well.utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the protect convert 2%acres or more of it native vegetation to pasture? Driveway.parking roads,etc. CC'G'S• }t. c),,w.1 sq/ft E Circle: Yes c Ng . Lawn.landscaping,etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc —. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance t 4 GL' sq/ft I Cut Fill lculyd) (over) s-,-,--ate,:a,C, kshee(-RE'. 1.1 20 3 • • i' 1 Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the scr mantle as under natutel •Conditi ps it j prior to development A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface'r greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow •i " ' from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof ,'t_ tons. walkways, patios. driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads. packed earthen rclate,ri5?5 - and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) 5{.C' sq'ft Structures(all roof area) ((,Lk • sq ift Sidewalks sot Sidewalks sq,ft Patios sq'ft Patios sqift Solid Decks sq'ft Solid Decks (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) sgrft Driveway,parking,roads,etc 5;-4,,,,,+ L,G,.: sgift Driveway,parking.roads, etc -3eu Other "54c °j. *- sq!ft Other sgift Total New i l h sglft Total Existing '2 T3 L-' s lft q TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING' -%t sq/ft This amount wit be used to check total lot coverage. • The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: 2-t Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes Cam, FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: if the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no. the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture. the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet. l as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of at owners of the affected property. (: L�f � !tl'.,,ND hRER OR AUTHORIZED RERRESEN TA?''.-SIGNATURE) (DATE) , FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM LARGE REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No - Tora,.,^ate,raid.,orkshee!—RE,' ` '"r^� • . , • -. E.-7 r7) 1! V !r ---Alder Drive--- 'i 11 1 '' I 13 i _ I IY t 1 C. ..0 I / `1DMrf1T 1 k as l > a) , / i 1 (25' setback from Alder Drive) • v°j -4-- ri: c./ V °Ji I ct I / N i // house 1 / I 8 I / / I 1 1 i / // I 1 i / o co / U I I / as o _0 I co I N I in C I Y N I ° ° 1 j j CO I m_ 1\\ I I m E 3 j m i N CC) m o � `�� septic tanks ! • I .N °0 septic line _c o arc % I I I 41005 mII Glendon v .N I 0, module mc ° 3 I Plal ° x I - - - Lus ° m -° I o 30' down slope I ""PlIF protection area I 1 0 I proposed I 14'x30 pole Glendon I barn 30' module 1 . • 1 i 30' down-slope 1 i protection area I A i v( _ I- 5' setback i p` ROVED g, 1� 4 — 84' SITE PLAN Site Address: 132 Alder Drive Parcel Number: 940800057 0' g' 16' r: . , . Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503) 422-2675 _4 ' JEFFERSON COUNTY i Scale DEPT OF COMMUNITY EVELOPMEYT 3kJI�It1� uKC:G,(iyerrr...O.... ')(,t..-4 • 0 -1 L Area=420 sq.ft. Truss span=14' Post Spacing=10`O/C Post height=9'-12 above grade Corner posts=6x6 PT for ground contact Side posts=6x8 PT for ground contact E N z w G c� 5- o w `11 '' C2 C�; I � E I 0' 2' 4' Post Spacing Plan 1 I 1 132 Alder Drive Scale i • • ---Alder Drive--- . .5---- qs-- ----- •1 .1 0 �A W. 1 Cr + , o is O _ is I i1'I -cr) 1 gym. _ V 5 1 I,• - , (2 i m (25'setback from Alder Drive) I ` c 1 > 4-_ -a I I . I as - I N . house 1 I in j F- 1 1 I / m 1 I I i el 1 I 2 I I I i 0 1 I i E 1 l 2 I r- --T , ' N N I --'i i i I i ,� , ��^ �.` septic tanks I v '— 3 I o septic tine ` ` -, - II 1 I (14"eave aF \ •overhang,gutters at i am �` + ki/ 1 s Mirth and south Q + Isidds,drain to grass 1 1 surface) I Ili Glendon + i // module + I I 30 i 1 ' 30'down-slope 1 protection area i 1 I I I proposed • 14'x30 pole Glendon 1 barn 3t _ module i I 41 30'down-slope + -_t i protection area i ir, S — i-- �ij — + 5'setback — — \ I 4 --- gK '--- Site Address: 132 Alder Drive 0' 8' 16' Parcel Number: 940800057 Owner: Jeff Jackman and Shelly Strom a 0 I 1 I 1 I Drawn by: Jeff Jackman (503)422-2675 r, Scale • L.p_vo t,75 1148'65 - CAPE GEORGE VILLAGE DIV. 4 c SECTION /3 - T 3O N - H.2 W- W.M. CFN7ER SEC7/4/1//3 Y=404,/30.36 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON X=450/,3/7 43 _ ®-- S 88./2'S6T f /469.95 * x'23• o. DEN/S' S 9T/9"56'E _ BLYD c-6 sr 320.ao - - 2 -_ _ g 308E "V it �.a.�. 05 W /3000 y W-- /30.00 ao.oo ,uo a /O /sa oo /3/.39 h ,1e. 7. rig.5,7 5 ---Y--Kp \ 38 2/ M I a z ` :— �s' iY R, 3I v' Z2 e° 43 °7 v•"3' 44 R 65 e\\ -' 20 '0- Na Da a:z cr- h N R'0e"v.1,4,4 c, 0 3900 6Z� Zf4S p li- 2, 4.1.11'31{' q ti 0,/5' E r - 2, d./S 3oas �$1� Rs4 /297 >z 17 6;5 ° ° g E \ y �- usccrc Post ry Ner4977'ere *a.,,,d Ne7i9u'ra /.0.1.30" . N.6 30•Ew i 3 p.pp o4 e . \'Z•Zt e-,�n.in.a,,,',,a•Irirro' 4.(5 1 g .�13 m, 9 '•° 20 W N` •., 23 "`0 42 �•, \ 45 64 ° H\r o 66 v 7 \° ,0 130 i 19.°,18" 1/61'35.00 ,0 8 \m 9,° 35.,-t v\ r,. P ° -I,'a.00 . a N'6' Q l3 ° \-o O.� N68;30p0 ape. .p4. . \ 0 g6.P/9 -� Z4 g p 4✓ N\Z ,• g 67 $ r4 8� I6 6. o 'l,1 �\ a"E O?UM:IWr///�fcN.lY fc 8 61.35 0 p 0 \ $ 68,30 SQ.`_ C , f•Jy 2+s/.Nvt6ra e� N 130 o Z� _ a '$ \b N. $- 13.19'_ .s.H /-'/oo' /B H c 40 N 62 $ A 6B 1�a,�7B \ .\c^ >$N'6d 35"j6 E 8\�$ 61.d�.18^6 c , roz iO3Rr ,\ $ .35,18, 38 1.31'/9fR. . \ 0.4° 'ate � c .° v�O 49 N..µ $ \ g 76,plet o�� N\o 27 $ 3B 2 15' N C 60 77 0 ►. o7O.° 1B e- °° 35./t `- t 0'3/;5133 f 0.1'S'fSp'6R v° 7) .W v N N rn 11.68.0,00 , g- 1 0,0 N'T 1,N r .. ,„'.v, N W /S o\ 13 2B s 37 a SO 59 v° N 7e 49,31 G 0 It f 5 o \ -% I.,0, -ip- 4.5`4411' R. a°\ ,''4,5•'13'ER. ' Rkst .1 .• ;N80, nA v. N 30.00 ;$ a N69 10" --t, * 9', ��`,o, NTp36 /1rrSe 03"E n� . 7/ 0.1.450 ' i u,-k' yo .4 H w 36 `,y . _ .J8 , �' ,N83' °p Wpl N7Y3S37Rr.°Y.o''. ` ,r•lr''„ �Ra Ner31,r.R � _ .. •�Rte• R. 1%1: , 72• ./• 52•K,•E I /3 °�tal, `4.yI/1O"'y� 35 �' °o a Ne7zo'soc ' L2 . „ 30 6, g 04.54346'°� .J7 $ i d,4'/S.se"�.rer oe7E ` ,y°4�'• 'O N89'OJ'S/'f R d t•Sf'/J' I r ti ',yeC00'L1 ' i5:1 /yey',HSO•E.R R A.'J d.54.."f.R 7.3 y 4 ti /28.07 $8i� a °0 8 0.3.52"00" N .4 h8 W e'6 Ir ka d'3'47iv" > . 4.3y540- -'4.2'/9.22'; ,Ne Ir_ft-0 a kcs b y /2 3/ 53 w S6 W e=orr23' `7S o N9Y.54C97r4 . MN.s7 s407if �NC/'sI017K' ' hN97W09'99- Ne7'.5405/V" �, a 7¢ 7 / ..00 NIq� /3400 /MOO 4Nq /7004 /30.00 C q /30.Q9 /O/4B r . 8 1/ b 32 - 33 a o m (� .S¢ ` NV 0 �� 0 c, 5`. L°' ss' 230.00 N C . ` u ti\ o a -c�6:r2. p/9 ' —.Y-97.5409 1' __ /3000 2 /3000 /3000 `k /30.00 9e.e2 40 pa f' /99.Q ZI $I-. I co,Bit S ro6.96 t 920.00 24e.ez 4 K — _—�+i RIDGE va7-s4 os rr DR/VE 4r blf1,s w o -— _ SHOO ' .. 90 00 6 i' 'V 0 $ S c TRACT A ti gyq' b /D 9 B 7 6 S 4 3 p• a o ` 2 2 90.00 „ „ .. „ 9..00 9795 _ /9706 ,p1/ N.07.54'09'IV 464,3/ 460.70 fT 1 DESCR/PT/ON This P/o, of CAPE GEORGE V/LLAGE D/V 4 /,'r /oco7bo' /he P/o/of-Cooe GPoye ii//oyr Div 3 recoodeo M 40/ 4 in /he horthrrest quorter of///e sou/heost Quo-/cr and ofP/ois,Poyes S9,60 o///n the ree-o,-ds of./o/ -,.co- ' '-'/y, /he na/-/heosf qua,-'o' of h*e• soufheosf quoi'fen of Sec. Woshiny ton ono'in a//fhe ha-fheas/Qaonter of 108,,906,7* .s/ /3,Township 30/Yo,-/b, Rouge 2 iVest, 4%44 and Con/oi/7s t c, Quo1'ten /yin9 {Yes"of Couny Rood No.40 /ess /hes/,00.-/ion pf-9a described oS fo/%rv3; A// of/he not/hrves/9uor/er Piny in sold,o/ot of L'o,oe Geo/ye V/Y/oye Dir 2. of/he southeast Qo'o-/ei- /mss /he /2/o/ of.Co,oe 6e•arge i////oye Div 2 -ecoro%/in Yo/4 of P/ofs,/ye 44 and/ess SHEET/ aF 2 5 • L.P-1104 -p9z4 ZoF2 cape george colony - cal v 4- .,... Sec. /2 8c/3 - T30 N - R2 W - W Al. jeffersom count, w-asitinryton DEDICATION AND RESTRICTIONS ENGINEERS CERT/F/GATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that The undersigned owners in Pee /hereby certify that this plot of CAPE GEORGE COLONY simple of/he land herein platted, hereby.declare this plat, reserving unto the air a is based upon an actual survey and subs vision of undersigned all roads,streets,avenues,drives,p/aces,paths,sewer easements and Sec/ions II and/3, Toy 30N, RI W, WM, that/he&a-- propert adjoining the beach as shown an the plat,and also reserving unto the iinderrgned lances and courses are shown hereon correctly;that the the right to make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon the lots, blocks, tracts, monuments have been set and the lot and block corners parcels,etc,shown on this plat in the reasonable original grading Mall the roads,streets, ,w us ess staked correctly upon the ground,and that/have/idly avenues,drives,places,paths,etc.,shown herein,or in subsequent grading necessary -w - complied with the provisions of the st lutes and plat- for acceptance by a municipality having jurisdiction in event of dedication to public use, rr v :'"""` ling regulations.te and also reserving unto the undersigned the right M drain all roads, shreds,ave es; c wss'oszerr /., drives,p/aces and paths over and across any lot or lots where water might take a - ----7 9 ,4M natural course after the same have been graded There is hereby granted, as a r t " c ij i o R -- pr/vale right, to each and all purchasers or owners of any lot, tract or parcel within t ,®`F. W� :0.by�1 A A the knits of this plat, the,o ivi/ege to use all roads, streets,avenues,drives,'axes, ``�. *wt' ,e paths and the property constituting the beach and that/immediately adjoining the beach _ I t.• w. 4r y'c as shown on th s plat and on any other plats of CAPE GEORGE COLONY that may be 5 `1° •msµE'►�'' created, formed or annexed by CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, INC.,specifnutty reserving I ,+ unto itself the right to negotiate, form or annex additions to this plat and to grant w the same privileges as provided herein to said additions or annexations. Said roads, NMcuo,EA•w ..- ",°co,^"'°" streets, avenues, drives, places and paths shall be constructed and maintained by • mro �-- A CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, /NC, subject to a reasonable maintenance charge that may be made by the undersigned CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, INC as condition to the 7.,;.:,;, ;u exercise of said privilege of use, and subject to the right reserved in the under ' v h signed CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, /NC to assign such maintenance obligation and �, .P i}right to charge therefor to a non-profit corpo anon, hereinafter referred too as'tlw �*a z corp°ation,'or any other such association formed for/ha/purpose, and t ereby s1.rc cea- 4 /2 7 me f p,. absolve said undersigned of all responsibility and lability pertaining thereto. \, .°I F,w�'eltan' 13 18 sec con All lots, tracts or parcels embraced in this p/al are subject to and shall be sold under the fodowiny covenants and restrictions, which shall run with the land for I Me benefit of each lot, tract or parcel in this p/a/,, and shall be binding on all pun- I chasers and owners thereof and their personal representatives,heirs,successors and t assigns, to wit: t - 'L- All purchasers,or owners of real property or interest therein in this plat must - W be acceptable to the Membership Committee of CAPE GEORGE COLONY,a non-profit ,+at' corporation(hereafter referred to as 'The corporation-4 to be formed by CAPE •°"v GEORGE LANO CO, /NC or ifs nominees,and must become Members of CAPE i ry GEORGE COLONY. "' No houses or buildings shall be constructed a/a distance closer than twenty-five SUBDIVISION feet from the front of any lot, tract or parcel except where the contour of the X OF SECTIONS ground prohibits such a setback. Before constructing a residence or budding of any knd, it shall be mandatory for ti Scale: /'a/000' the builder or purchaser and properly owner to first submit a plan of such con- -.. Ree•d'ns•R struclion to the corporation for approval by its Building Committee,and no work of T - esatsi Rod MPe ,,_,-.. any nature whatsoever shalt be started on the residence or build/no before the plan is approved in writing by the corporation. All buildings shalt be completed on the s exterior, including paint, within six months after the starting dale. There shall be no house trailers for residential purposes located in either Div lion Number One or Division Number Two of the P/al of CAPE GEORGE COLONY andany .. trailer in any other location before being occupied must be provided with water out- E W lets, septic tank,electrical power/ire and a concrete slab in accordance with the ti v y approval of the Building Comm/Pee of the corporation. , There shall be no residential structure that will have an appraised value of less t°j than Five Thousand Dollars (55,,000.00). Keeping of livestock,pets and poultry shad be subject to the approval of the Corporation in writing. lxwcN-ins ao/ There shall be no discharging of firearms or hunting on the properly. c nc.5 No fees or natural shrubbery shall be removed unless approved in writing by norms Nes•nao N Nerszs• /3 /8105 cow MOn The undo signed CAPE GEORGE LAND CO,/NC, it being the intention to preserve ma mnc mo" co°r'c n1O"-xa •r 24/9"'cur • alt natural growth of any kind, and no fires of any description shall be sie kit thing ucsNR- the fire season without wnt/en permission of Me CAPE GEORGE LAND CO,/NC. • This p/a/shall be bini/ed to suburban residences,except, however;a community bum- • ness center or other buildings planned and designated by the CAPE GEORGE LAND TREASURERS CERTIFICATE CO., /NC, and no business of any kind shall be permi/tied thereon without the written permission of the CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, INC The entire area embraced in this pia,shall be considered and treated as private I, Treasurer of Jefferson County,Washington, hereby certify that all tares on Me above property and at no lime shall be open to the public, properly, together with the payment of advance taxes required before filing of the . Any lot, tract or parcel of this plat of CAPE GEORGE COLONY or of any annexa• p/al,are fully paid up to and including the year /963,- hens Hereto which are made subject to the foreganq covenants and restrictions,shall "� ` revert to CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, /NC, its successor or assigns,in case of a breath -Ciraisen.. j&( e:_5.✓- of any provisions of the foregoing covenants and reslrichons, and a breach /hereof TREASURER OFJ FFERSON rouNTv shad/of itself operate t0 ex/anguish the tide upon the declare/ran of such breach by CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, /NC, its successor or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands this APPROVALS day of July, 196/ CAPE GEORGE LAND CO INC P-2------) Approved by me Phis� ay _ /96/ L+-'+f/�1// R4("4E CR -- . NT ���iTmiREER ---jjj--- -- "42 IL ACKNOWLEDG ENT ■ Approved by the Board of County Commissioners this lay of(a(♦AL!, 1961 STATE of WASH INGTON'25 '',u I ■ c,,,,,.v`e of r/ nawERs COUNTY of JEFFERSON L�^ 4 On this LA day of A.D./96/, before me, the undersigned,a Notary Public in t. I(;3a A,• Attest. -et-14.� and for the State of 7fash�ton,duly commissioned and sworn,personalty appeared - COUNTY iron 4NO CLERK Howard 6 Ridded/and J Frederick Palmer; to me known*,be Pres,denl and Sec etiry+ -.. J. 00450 of CO Orr coawusiONERs respectively, of CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, /NC, /he corporation that executed the .' t69 re9 gong instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and vo/ant v fa act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mensbned:.wd RECORDING CERTIFICATE on oath slated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and/hal the' .___ ry Sea/affixed is the corporate sea/of said corporation. Filed for record al the request �On _141.4.1.1- WITNESS my hand and official sea/hereto a�sed/he day and year first above written. /96/, at 30minules pas/1(.__oclock, and recorded in Vo ume_ _ Plats, • • page__a_#_,.., records of Jefferson County. aoreer PO r are of 'Y/- WASN/Nt rON, RE, 4 �y igtli - OEROTY 440/roR VV sNEET P aF 2 • 5 • • L.PA61 ,4 p.116 CAPE GEORGE VILLAGE DIV. 4 J SECT/ON /3 - T3oN - R.2 W- NM. JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON ACKNOWL ED6ME/VT STATE of WASH/NGTON I S.S. ''.".. a COUNTY of JEFFERSON 0 On this L3' day of_•�-3Nex!/965, before me, the undersigned,a Notary Public S e in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,persona//y Q ; appeared Howard G Ridde//and V Keith Colman, to me known to be Presiden/ 0 ■ __ and Secretary-Treasurer, respective/y,of CAPE GEORGE MOBILE VILLAGE,INC. �� and of CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, INC, the corporations that executed the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the fleeend 4, I voluntary act and deed of each of sold corporations, far the uses end purposes' a> Nea it$Ew 161353 therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute SI Fcui v` the sad instrument and that the seals affixed are the respective operate seals of said corporations. •/ ® © ..{.� o �^ m I WITNESS my hand ono'of!'lcie/seal hereto affixed the day and year in?his (. Qo� © �� �`v certificate above written I. ■ rearTab-r ti j' .,./ n�'y� Q�. - '. 1-Ir .♦ %32222 /322 22 $ u ,l•'-t1,2.1. -.-- ` .WTA .L/c/A'ANDFORTN€$1242T ',,-` hl WASN/NerON, RES/DING AT ',4.,,�' T ry T Fd co.coun. M.G. ' /376/e not Ind. Ne7'3513"W 3 /e - Kr = .d ewx.mm. Ielaq axon vsnR• Feroc.mon. SUB O/VIS/ON of SECT/ON Ja0.M-. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE SCALE /'=1000' i /hereby certify that this plat of"Cape George Village Dire/s based upon -- -—---------- - _ -- - _ -- --- an actual survey and subdivision of Section /3,TownshP 30 North,Range 2 West, NM, that the distances and tourers are shown hereon correctly,and Mot/have fu/ly complied wit/ the provisions of the statutes andpla//iny rep//at/on. }_> - /• LANSJDRY PP r DEDICATION AND RESTRICTIONS TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE /, Treasurer of Jefferson County, Washington, hereby certify that e//taxes on KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the enders f'Cape owner in tee simple the above property together with the payment of advance taxes required before of the land herein platted hereby declares this p/at of'Cape George Vi//aye fifiny of the plat,are fully paid up to and including the year/965•+-/!LL Div 4'; subject iv the restrictions,covenants and reservations set forth in that certain AGREEMENT FOR RESTRICTIONS,COVENANTS,AND RESERVATIONS AND PROVIDING FOR ANNEXATION OF PLAT;'dated the 9"day of Ju ly,/963, 4.L /Jd ""e^�_ and recorded In Volume/6/,pages 548 to 555 under Auditor's Fi'/e No./76650, TREASURER OF JEFFERSON 00uNTY records of Jefferson County, Washington. ri IN WITNESS WHEREOF the w,dersigned have hereunto se/their hands this_t_3__ day of.f i st_,/965. CAPE GEORGE VILLAGE, /NC. APPROVALS ��QQ// Examined and approved this_ZCe day of hZ.ea-E-_—,/965. - RES1 E�---- . Z-� Fe ...,,a.> i sECRETARv-TREASDRER county ENe/Naga Examined end approved by the Board of County Commissioners thi s!!_dry o __ _ /965 DECLARATION OF ANNEXATION n t Mies _ �r- y- , R e_ COUNTY TOR{CLERK CNA/RANN . The undersigned does hereby acknowledge that the foregoing plat of Cape George BOARD oFCOUNrr COMMISSIONERS BOARD or cowry co owohieroNERs Yi//aye Div 4 is hereby annexed to "Cape George Colony"and the plats thereof -. insofar that the seine privileges as to the use of the reserved property and rights under "Cape George Colony-and the plats thereof are ex fended to each and all purchasers and owners of any lot, tact or parcel within the hinds of Cape George Y7/age Doid"as are printed to the purchasers and owners RECORD/NG CERTIFICATE of any/a, tract or parcel of the plats of"Cape George Colony, subject however to the same Imitations and restrictions as are applicable to such use as provided for/h the plats of Cape George Colony. F d for record at the request of Howard G.Riddell on this J day of /%5, at,$o minutes pass/Qo'clock, and recorded in • CAPE GEORGE LAND CO, INC Y/u _ ._of Plats, pages751L,records of Jefferson County,Washington. PREOI21‘2---_ iirTY AUDITOR -- e-' ‘4...ta e- -. SeCQErarrgnASUR DEPUTY Au0/TOR SHEET Z OF 2 _5 road Page 1 of 1 • • ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 132 ALDER DR ROAD NUMBER:P4 ROAD NAME:ALDER DR ADDRESS:132 APT: REAL MILE POST:.13 RT APPLICANT:JEFF JACKMAN ADDRESS CREATION DATE:04/27/04 PARCEL:940800057 LEGAL:CAPE GEORGE VILLAGE DIV 4 LOT 58 GRID:AA-6-I FIRE DIST:6 ZIP:98368 POSTAL DISTRICT:PORT TOWNSEND PLANNING AREA: VOTING DIST: CEMETERY DIST: HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST: WATER DIST: SITE LONGITUDE:122.86957 SITE LATITUDE:48.0902 SITE COORDINATE TYPE:BUILDING CENTER-PLAN ACCESS LONGITUDE:0 ACCESS LATITUDE:0 MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS http://isserver/Address/RoadAddressDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=P4&ADDRESS=132 12/31/2014 Map Output • • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map • til i . 91106.:_wty / Legend Selected Features C_Rcads Parcels-H Contours r a: � rn :: •'h r:.i .. . r ,.. t, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 30 16:39:22 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 12/30/2014 Map Output • 41111 Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. . i - Or ..-i ..... , ..ee „....4:61...), ilk calr . \ OA” -----vil Ilite .4 40.- 0, 4. 4-4*- . * e 44 it 9 :oaceoco 2 Legend t 0 Selected Features r ,A, JC_Roads tilit' itt. V r .II, 40, r Parcels-H 2013 Aerial Photos .., ..,.......0 ,4,i ... , .. ' ilt --4 240800351 ll' 240800056 44 ' L4 e.,* if tL-ie I . -A 1 - . op , , ..*...... 414 * * 1* okr ,....— 4,-1 , " 3 ,., . 040800005 040e00v.:-1 I -. . 1 -.. , . 0 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 30 16:39:09 2014 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 12/30/2014 Map Output • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map tI� 1wY Legend Selected Features JC Roads Parcels-H I_$a. County Zoning w1_J'{ryt{ MPR SF Tracts Rural Rosdontal l:S Rural Resden1 W 1:10 Ali:uu:i:t::53 Rural Resden1 di 1:20 ;; MPR Saat:Famiy MPR Munnamdy at•_v ::ic '�1'_v'u.!!�70 MPR Roscet Complas Parks and Reuostor. ■ MPR Open Space Rural Forest Comman-.al Farts mfirming Forest lila ilea?),Indust rat .1,408,2„::05, , ■ Atrpon LPF 1111 MPR Village Center ?,. �Ni:•Yl_'tiia.;8 t ■ AP 1:20 ■ Rota Village Copier III• ,gun _, �.>c. Resource Gaud no taiga Indu ral 4 MPR Recreation 4401,2i:Ci52 940,.2,Y2•2,1' Waste Mgnd LPF LYM ■ WC Ctewroads GC x ■ Crossroads CC ■ Crossroads NC Ridge Or r m ' L ■ AL 1:20 UGA Urban Commercial - .. UGA Urban Ltgm lntlustna. - UGA MDR UGA-IIDR UGA Public UGA-LOR UGA Visitor Oriented Cemmorc a MPR URN Onnnon CF 80'MRLOCommaerciat Fares Mineral Renounce Overlay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 30 16:37:48 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 12/30/2014 Map Output II Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map -� 940800046 \ 940800060 \ (t ,\ 940800063 .'-\ 9 0 x080004 , = 940900047 \t _.. 1y ' e __;\ 940800075 '1 \-_1 1' 7• ca \- '` V .� \ 940u�t0o64='�� 1\ 941;00019 9!40900039 \ 940E0006y ti t1 _ _' '' t \ ti 1 1 %1 tt 1 ti ,,. t't+ 940800069 ti y \ 94x940495 _s, \ Iti 9 /.:ill: 40800038 \ 940800048 1 y ■ 119 `' `� ti \ s __ �y ` i t\. 1 11 \ \ 'Ir--- _ 940800072 Legend 940900037 \ y, 940800049 A 1\ �\ Selected Features '; I I /J JC Roads y 't _=�Y~ t t�___.--- 940800061 y i Parcels-H 940600036 \ 940800050 f 940800057 ll____---iii !I, Soils-H _i'\- -- ---,72-1 —, ?i J' 940900030 94119x008$ ill I 940900435 900900061 H -940800031 6408 064 944800062 ' 941600055 940800071 940800070 94080032 940800033 ';.. 940600053 940600064 w... 1 2 'Dr 0 . m _ _ •94x600001 , 940800074 n 940900048 i 940800005 v •- t 940800003 !940900002 , 14:vs n•u.+ded ar•--c"r-.m Cur"y Cer Y:'l Se,ors,I� 0 INNIMMIMMINNI'2311 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 30 16:36:45 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=... 12/30/2014 Ma Output p • • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 9a ao�a w0800 a6 gq pip. �` ;� � 940800063 / t f f :414140041 4.-/---- r - 940800075 \ \-7-v tt 7 1 N Q �,4 - - 941100014 040800039 'A_ � 1 s 'i• r y ` ti 1 f, 9408Cd}D65 ,,.?. 940800059 '�� �ti I' 990840048 , 94()800438 , j r, $ may-_ / ti\ y 1 - _ M ' " ' t } ie00066 — _= 1 9408000721 ti 94080003? �\ \ 940BGYYw9 S, 940840058 ,L _---—` 'i .' 0 Selected Features t `.- = y Y 940440467 ' JC Roads r = a f u'y�_ l n Parcele44 908 0036 940800050 I ' I Contours = I !I I I 940800068 J. �f, /V s0Fawcaanour 9"0800030940800036 I 940604451 __,.. 944304056 '' '" i' 940800031940800034 940600052 J 7J ('r : 9446004fd 940800071 J 940800070 r_ `raj !( 940800033'• !y—' \ 9900000�i4 J �f LE . hf v i — —Mg*Dr r' �4 w i — 940800074 CQ iii — 1 940600041 ' "1_t 940800005 1 940800004 940600003 '940600002 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 30 16:35:56 2014 t http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 12/30/2014 • i C: ° L-14 -5° A spa oa Ag <z< is "'y °- Ai oy, • -,7:A° — c v. g og, mnf x n c°cz m °z � � , — m oz £n a� c.',7,0.1'.4°?", �N m z ..og - — m o 0 F E w-N 0 'N 9 • • 0 2610.72' (SW 1/4 13-30N-2W) We Y.I**40 as�moo voin.11® �Z rn. o mvm S m,N 3nR10 m , 0 P x,m 0 g o m o N � o _____ ,. ,, Iliii � ao <. 0 .o pF' Po m��©© 1101111LIMrr'I 8_ imist \w3lopw _31a A • A IQ imi0110110,. `MP u W Z ealsom:, � N f 1 -›V.\.\ anos `3A1210 ,_, ...._,,„ „, ....._,, -0° gin PARK n - < D O -3`3 ()-30 m °d O m N o O O p\N m N omo N 00 C3 0 n A( F m CO �d a 9 CO �:�i.� ,320.22' < •r�0���?�4O 0 m 2640.44' - L l- (SW 1/4 18-30N-1W) %` v o 7 in M• M -O o N n C,u N N m 'y Za U ,, a u * Z (''l o e: ,S a m5 om� n " LI • • Anna Bausher From: Jeff Jackman<jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 9:24 AM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE: BLD14-00471 Additional Information Needed Hi Anna, There is no second drywell. The drywell that I had installed for the house contains 10 cubic yards of drain rock. According to the manual you sent, I would need no more than 90 cubic feet of drain rock per 1000 square-feet of roof. I have 2100 square-feet of roof, so I should need 189 cubic feet of drain rock. The drywell contains 10 yards (270 cubic feet). Jeff From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 4:15 PM To: Jeff Jackman Subject: RE: BLD14-00471 Additional Information Needed Hello Jeff, Thank you for your quick response.When connecting into an existing drywell DCD needs to verify that it can accommodate the additional stormwater runoff.A standard drywell can accommodate 1,000sq/ft of stormwater runoff based off the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Manual.The square footage of stormwater runoff for the house and proposed pole building is about 2,100 sq/ft based off of the application. Do you know if there is an existing second drywell for the house in order to accommodate for both the house and the proposed pole building? Thank you, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner-DCD Phone 360-379-4434 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Jeff Jackman [mailto:jeff @pointsourcesolutions.com] Sent:Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:05 PM To:Anna Bausher Subject: RE: BLD14-00471 Additional Information Needed Hi Anna, I was told earlier by Stan that splash blocks would be adequate. Regardless, I have revised the site plan (attached)to show the existing drywell that I can use to handle the roof drainage from the garage. Please let me know what else you need. Jeff 1 • • From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:00 AM To: jeff@pointsourcesolutions.com Subject: BLD14-00471 Additional Information Needed Good morning Jeff, I am the planner in DCD who is reviewing your building permit for a new pole building. Sally, our permit technician, has indicated to me that you prefer to be contacted by email. I am contacting you because I need some additional information regarding stormwater management.All new development must address stormwater management based off of the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.All stormwater needs to be managed on the property unless there is an agreement to divert it off of the property. It appears that for the proposed pole building downspouts and splashblocks have been proposed. Downspouts and splashblocks require a 50 foot vegetated flowpath based off the stormwater manual. With the slope of the property the stormwater will run northwest, however,there is not a 50 foot vegetated flow path from the proposed pole building to the property.This will need to be addressed before I can complete my review for this permit.As it does not appear that with the location of the proposed pole building, that there will be room for a 50 foot vegetated flow path, one option I see is to revise the stormwater management and use a drywell. Drywells have a 10 foot setback from structures and property lines. From the site plan it appears that you would have room to place a drywell to the east of the proposed pole building to meet these setbacks and to be outside of the 30' down-slope protection area. I see that Fred Esson is a representative, I only have a phone number for him so I could not copy him on this email. I noticed that you designed the site plan so I thought I would contact you first and if you would like Fred to work with the stormwater I will contact him. I am attaching a handout regarding drywells from the 2012 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for your reference. If you have questions regarding this information please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street*Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher(,u7,co jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Standard Conditions for Residentevelopment in Jefferson County • 1. LIGHTING: Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT: The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 3. OUTDOOR STORAGE: Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 4. UNLICENSED VEHICLES: Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 5. PARKING: A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 6. This permit has been reviewed consistent with JCC 18.40.130 & 140. Notice: this permit does not excuse the applicant from complying with other local, state and federal ordinances, regulations or statues, applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Future development beyond that specified in this permit shall require further review. 7. BMPs: The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine 2013-03-07 SFR_StdConditions 3/7/2013 1 1 . , 4 si'iii • A „.-- ---R co f Doling:4.A Howe 7,1 / Catch Basin / ( rd Drain) ,,-..,...,,, / i ---- —4,- , 7---------_- \ 0 ' ----=:---, DGYMPOU -,- . i 0 I DRY WELL 481n,31-1 Dia riietPr Hole Filled will) PUN VIEW . lila-3'Washed Drain Rode, .. NTS . R co'Domnsp311 , .. , 1,--Mark Ceriter of Hole i witi f Carpal PVC Ho uw —Overflow i F°11511114rithlitian'$.0e N.„ ,—Srlash Block Topscil—, / . .., . i. .0. a I '1, ',...d' ,.,....,-.., , ....". fKive „, Fine Me-h Screm-- -- —m,in-4 'Jo- rilu.4 1 —2 vil -rig 1 PVC Pie Catch Basin I,*IA Drain) tki 481mh Dia rmter ,:i.i! 41'Min. Sides of Hole k4, Hole Hied wit Linedwith k 02-3nYashed -: Filt.r Fabric. 6 Drain Rock .. a. 11,4 IS -min. ,... -Itit. .4".rash.416° ..oThNiftr,,7. M in. 1'4.-_Kli.x3 1.:`,, •.B.--,..,:nia I DRY WELL Hiah Grouridwalgr.fabl. SECTION NTS Figure 3.1.4 -Typical Downspout Infiltration Drywell - .. Source: King County Volume III-Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs-August 2012 3-9 T Drywells Genera • 1. Drywell bottoms must be a minimum of 1 foot above seasonal high ground water level or impermeable soil layers. 2. When located in course sands and cobbles, drywells must contain a volume of gravel equal to or greater than 60 cubic feet per 1000 square feet of impervious surface served. When located in medium sands, drywells must contain at least 90 cubic feet of gravel per 1,000 square feet of impervious surface served. 3. Drywells must be at least 48 inches in diameter(minimum)and deep enough to contain the gravel amounts specified above for the soil type and impervious surface served. 4. Filter fabric (geotextile)must be placed on top of the drain rock and on trench or drywell sides prior to backfilling. 5. Spacing between drywells must be a minimum of 10 feet. 6. Downspout infiltration drywells must not be built on slopes greater than 25% (4:1). Drywells may not be placed on or above a landslide hazard area or on slopes greater than 15%without evaluation by a professional engineer with geotechnical expertise or a Iicensed geologist,hydrogeologist, or engineering geologist, and with jurisdiction approval. Volume III—Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs—August 2012 3-6