Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZON2015-00009 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#MLA15-00018 Review Type Project Description ' )i1 p ZON 15-00009 I CONSISTENCY REVIEW ONLY AGRICULTURE BUILDING FOR WINE,BEER,CANNING ALL FOR HOME USE Primary: NOVAXX INCORPORATED Site Address: 2955 HILLCREST, STE 102 756 CENTER RD A,s2 A1S1 5 THOUSAND OAKS CA 91302 CHIMACUM WA, 98325 kAntie CAM Pt/ ' 2g Project LocationARGE 1901143007 S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 CAM -f -(03 l Parcel Numbe,L 901143007�'a'-T-R: 14-29N-1W Total Acreage 15 Legal Description X14 T29 R1W TAX 74 Land Use: 8300 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning ea: 6 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 49 Zoning: A/ �d COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [✓] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map (Property lines submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [y'f Legal Access to Property YES NO [VI Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents a ,.......,1\10 a�, E „ �j A 0 ""00, 7 [ ,4--- ESA's: Special Reports Nearby c �r ry N0 [V]- Designated Ag Vft, NO Ajo --A D [ v]' Shoreline Designation: NO 6 h;in4 C L'► Ct ekk — C7✓1'5 P,(ti9 owl c [ ] Shoreline Slo se Stability: YES NO Stream Type •Es NO l'jyat C,,c,f - is FWHCA: itib NO fr) , AIL c ,11 T 'iii 0111-r-.4 Cana7f ldk∎1 Wetlands: NO /i ! -.,,i .l'_. . , _ a > . .s 0:- ; Rare Plants:YES fiT0 Rtze-orit rot Seismic: NO ��2d�� Landslide: YES P Flood: 313 NO Erosion: YES Aquifer Re harge -reac3;_a) NO j'�,�C SIPZ: r�0- At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: CAP High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plans bmitted: YesNq [ ] Forest Lands: YES Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: S NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: NO [ ] Archaeology: YES (9 [ ] No Shooting Zone: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other 1 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage: 60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)& Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 901143007 1.) Wetland Delineation BLD07-00262 See Laserfiche or MLA07-00275 for full 6/28/07 Report report. Associated CASES status issued finaled description 901143007 CAM14-00148 M 3/5/2014 BLA to sell 5 to 6 acres of hay land to neighbor CAM14-00629 M 12/2/2014 Critical areas for building an agricultural building under exemption. CAM14-00631 M 12/5/2014 AG exempt strucutre-permits requried? MLA07-00275 BLD07-00262 F 6/20/2007 3/26/2008 NEW SFR W/ATTACHED GAR MLA15-00018 ZON15-00009 P CONSISTENCY REVIEW ONLY AGRICULTURE BUILDING FOR WINE,BEER,CANNING ALL FOR HOME USE PRJ06-00145 F SEP89-00353 F 6/19/1989 6/4/1993 USR06-00110 F 6/7/2007 6/7/2007 S0M89-00353 RCR 5/5/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 901142008 901141004 • .1 f d2tMi2 -- a . '•x1142001 I ;! 901143010 /i - ....:............. 901144001 9011 1 1 Legend .. ......... ........ :::: C l Parcels-H «.»xh.»'931.4 !\ 94�1t43009 SNIP Shoreline ' Environmental •. Chimacum CreeK4 ' ; ...... .....::.. _ Designations CM _s >9011440021 fi .. .. S ❑ Aquatic .. ._ 1,.. .. .. '-1 t. Conservancy 01111111117* teM 901232010 I 1 M tlgn tmensny _._ 901231009 901232012 , Nmurat .-`-T-' ".""-' f r_t++90123—t0f03 M NA c'c 3:, ,- t i Roomy Aquatic I 901232006 901231004 M Shoreline Residential ' i 1 .. . . 901231015 9_ 22"0'2 90'232018 .. ,A,•2 t 0 901232019 %4*r wcredal aj. su-i Cosily Co*ai Sex ecc t ..... o,7 602i/ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. Thu Air 02 17:12:17 2015 /02 V/ ' )0- -2._S-- r _ , _ ire R,J ,. , VA G id p Js�2,'.L7v (t1)( m>1,7V,prtBt,k , 3 i/um.7 A) or 46.a.-.ev 17\;[is5 gr ery 5)-)c-*\ ocro c' C'1 ,h CABS guy, Cc) os 4rlc br orerlivpin 41.4.. 10,4 tivtezA--rnes6+ .441§. .),„ei 0 a4'°t7( 5 h bt,1 'P er5 cs4 S el/3 elk S SLn4 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 4/2/2015 Re: Permit Exemption for Agriculture Structures from 18.20.030 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii) Structures. According to JCC 15.05.040(1), certain types of agricultural structures do not require a building permit from the department of community development. (A) No county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, feed, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to maintain farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. (B) Agricultural buildings that contain plumbing other than that as authorized above must obtain a plumbing installation permit and health department approval. (C) Agricultural buildings that contain a heat source for an agricultural purpose must obtain a wood stove permit or an electrical permit as appropriate. (D)Agricultural buildings used for the storage of private automobiles, trucks, etc., which are not licensed as farm equipment, are considered garages or carports and must obtain a building permit. (E) Agricultural buildings used for the purpose of hosting members of the public for the purpose of retail sales of agricultural products or machinery constructed on-site shall require a building permit to ensure life safety and structural integrity. If an older agricultural building constructed under the building permit exemption for agricultural buildings is proposed for hosting members of the public,the building shall be brought into compliance with the building code, as determined by the building official. (F)The building official shall judge whether a proposed structure, a structure under construction, or a completed structure violates this building permit exemption. A structure determined to be in violation will be considered a structure subject to the building code. Accessory Uses that support, promote,or sustain the agricultural operation Accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively on lands zoned as agriculture. Those uses, as described and specified in the Jefferson County Code 18.20.030(3) are exempt from Land Use Permits, subject to some limitations and provisions contained therein. This land use exemption is a separate and distinct issue from the building permit exemption for agricultural structures. } rrir r r. ,: u^ - Parcel Number: 001/43007 � : s: .. . Owner Mailing Address: NOVAXX INCORPORATED -` `' g 2955 HILLCREST STE 102 4 -9 154,i 5515 2. l'? ' , Et: C/77V�� 5 4 . . THOUSAND OAKS CA91302 Site Address: ` 1. • 756 CENTER RD . - .' . - �= - , . . . � �'�� = � t �� ' : CHIMA CU M 983 2 5 --=.± x t A: Section: 14 Qtr Section: SW1/4 I ..4 . Township: 29N -%- t r. t41444r: . Range: 1W - ! 'CJ 1 ? Sub Division: �.... I t. t vFi ' ` - , Assessor's Land Use Code: 8300 - Open Space Agricultural (A) t t ,. ' yc"..i... i. e:.— ,t1 ':.,r. it,, e:.-•X "'±Mrk 3 € Property Description: }'°.`t Lj" :' ,�: S 14 T29 R1 W TAX 74 r 3 fi ::,-. ..? „ $1 Lit %t 7 ''�`��is .. ,.. ' d u `wy. t � j�ppr �/ .... r 7 St' .. ., : •, 44,4:I "';`''..;,':',-SlieS:g. .."'-ri.. f.5.:%," ;.... .1:2.' ' say. `wL e� L � . ` l if ''. . '7. u .. / ✓✓ :aaa.a'ls�,wsy n -ll S ,1 COUNTY r :SETTER LONEM = " 4 = . V•„•<1 .,:?,.:�t:r iTY QEVE t r -t" i r.'tr ...,4Y `: i: z x, ,L,,,,, e • „ . b• • .. ..,....,_ ......______ ........, ..\,... .....„ .,,,.., ,..._. ., et, 11,3/,4 _____ _________ i . , 1 -1A:\^1Y3•177.0,S / ,,• . . . . . , ... #1.7i , . , . . . .......- L.A S o_Af. •,'-a , . 0 , ... . , . , . . . . , . 7 - R0012, , . . . . . , . v 1 5firto Li , e . , . 1...5, . , . , , ....,, JEFFERSON COUNTYD NO. 156053 DATE OS Iii /20s RECEIVED FROM KS ` WW1 ch teLd J t NC BARS# AMOUNT DESCRIPTION CURRENCY w TJ/si 1� �q 0.00 COIN � O2,2xe3 CHECKS 2- 1N r6 -aooQq Cl) 0 G(C -;, c 9 ) m o 0 TJ RECEIVED BY .X OYVk (a "e TOTAL a Sao C.)0 l)7) [(I 1-7 Ybc,A 0 14 3 ) ( --Ct ZCS( ).;1011/tOly kAf 4W1 ACCe(21 --/Y-1°T\r4) JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 2015 Additional Fees and Other Information GENERAL Health Officer Administrative Hearing 314.00 Administrative Hearing Appeal 314.00 Technical Assistance/Plan Review-Minimum 86.00 Technical Assistance/Plan Review-Per Hour 86.00 Filing Fee 54.00 Recording Fee 65.00 Plus the Auditors Office recording fees Notice to Title Rescission 525.00 ONSITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL Sewage Disposal Permits New Conventional 569.00 Valid for 3 years New Alternative 829.00 Valid for 3 years New septic tank and/or pump chamber only Issued in conjunction with an existing sewage disposal 340.00 system or community system New Community or Commercial Conventional 719.00 Base Fee-Valid for 3 years Alternative 919.00 Base Fee-Valid for 3 years Each Connection 90.00 Add to base permit fee Development and Review Financial Assurance and System 86.00 Per Hour Operation Agreements Septic Permit with Approved SPAAD(conventional) 307.00 Septic Permit with Approved SPAAD(alternative) 569.00 Applies to existing installed sewage disposal system;the Technical Assistance/Plan Review hourly rate will be Repair 50%of fee charged for repairs where the applicants require additional assistance Modification or Reserve Area Designation 258.00 Expansion 538.00 Redesign 172.00 Applies to pending or active but not installed Reinspection 215.00 Evaluation of Existing System/Monitoring Inspection Septic system only 334.00 Septic system plus water sample 377.00 Retest/Reinspection 172.00 On Site Sewage-Building and Planning OnSite-Site Plan Advanced Approval Determination (SPAAD) 397.00 Subdivision Review Base Fee 516.00 Boundary line adjustment or Lot Certification review fee 202.00 Planned rural residential development review fee 202.00 For Subdivision Review, Bounrdy Line Adjustment and Per lot fee 90.00 Planned Rural Residential Development Review fees Pre application meeting fee 202.00 Density exemption review fee 129.00 Field Work for Density Exemption Review 86.00 Per Hour Building application review: Residential-Individual OSS 129.00 Review after Building Permit issued, is same fee Commercial-Individual OSS 258.00 Review after Building Permit issued, is same fee Community OSS 258.00 Review after Building Permit issued, is same fee Revised Site Plan Review 65.00 Review of resubmission before Building Permit is issued Other WaiverNariance Application 237.00 _ WaiverNariance Hearing 387.00 Wet season evaluation 538.00 CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS SECTION 201 ADHERED MASONRY VENEER. Veneer secured and GENERAL supported through the adhesion of an approved bonding 201.1 Scope. Unless otherwise expressly stated, the follow material applied to an approved backing. ing words and terms shall, for the purposes of this code,have ADOBE CONSTRUCTION. Construction in which the the meanings shown in this chapter. exterior load-bearing and nonload-bearing walls and parti- 201.2 Interchangeability. Words used in the present tense tions are of unfired clay masonry units, and floors, roofs and include the future; words stated in the masculine gender interior framing are wholly or partly of wood or other include the feminine and neuter;the singular number includes approved materials. the plural and the plural,the singular. Adobe, stabilized. Unfired clay masonry units to which 201.3 Terms defined in other codes. Where terms are not admixtures, such as emulsified asphalt, are added during defined in this code and are defined in the International the manufacturing process to limit the units' water absorp- defined Conservation Code, International Fuel Gas Code, tion so as to increase their durability. International Fire Code, International Mechanical Code or Adobe, unstabilized. Unfired clay masonry units that do International Plumbing Code, such terms shall have the not meet the definition of"Adobe,stabilized." meanings ascribed to them as in those codes. [F]AEROSOL.A product that is dispensed from an aerosol 201.4 Terms not defined. Where terms are not defined container by a propellant.Aerosol products shall be classified through the methods authorized by this section, such terms by means of the calculation of their chemical heats of corn- shall have ordinarily accepted meanings such as the context bustion and shall be designated Level 1,Level 2 or Level 3. implies. Level 1 aerosol products. Those with a total chemical heat of combustion that is less than or equal to 8,600 Brit- ish thermal units per pound(Btu/lb)(20 kJ/g). SECTION 202 DEFINITIONS Level 2 aerosol products. Those with a total chemical heat of combustion that is greater than 8,600 Btu/lb(20 kJ/ I24-HOUR CARE. The actual time that a person is an occu g),but less than or equal to 13,000 Btu/lb(30 kJ/g). pant within a facility for the purpose of receiving care. It shall not include a facility that is open for 24 hours and is Level 3 aerosol products. Those with a total chemical capable of providing care to someone visiting the facility dur- ing any segment of the 24 hours. kJ/g). AAC MASONRY. Masonry made of autoclaved aerated [F] AEROSOL CONTAINER. A metal can or a glass or concrete (AAC) units, manufactured without internal rein- plastic bottle designed to dispense an aerosol. Metal cans forcement and bonded together using thin-or thick-bed mor- shall be limited to a maximum size of 33.8 fluid ounces(1000 tar. ml). Glass or plastic bottles shall be limited to a maximum size of 4 fluid ounces(118 ml). ACCESSIBLE. A site, building,facility or portion thereof that complies with Chapter 11. AGGREGATE. In roofing, crushed stone, crushed slag or water-worn gravel used for surfacing for roof coverings. ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS. A continuous and AGRICULTURAL BUILDING. A structure designed and unobstructed way of egress travel from any accessible point in a building or facility to a public way. constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. A continuous, unobstructed path not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment that complies with Chapter 11. where agricultural products are processed, treated or pack- ACCESSIBLE UNIT. A dwelling unit or sleeping unit that aged,nor shall it be a place used by the public. complies with this code and the provisions for Accessible AIR-INFLATED STRUCTURE. A structure that uses air- units in ICC A117.1. pressurized membrane beams, arches or other elements to ACCREDITATION BODY.An approved,third-party orga- enclose space. Occupants of such a structure do not occupy nization that is independent of the grading and inspection the pressurized area used to support the structure. agencies,and the lumber mills,and that initially accredits and AIR-SUPPORTED STRUCTURE.A structure wherein the subsequently monitors, on a continuing basis, the compe- shape of the structure is attained by air pressure and occu- tency and performance of a grading or inspection agency pants of the structure are within the elevated pressure area. related to carrying out specific tasks. Air-supported structures are of two basic types: [A] ADDITION. An extension or increase in floor area or Double skin.Similar to a single skin,but with an attached height of a building or structure. liner that is separated from the outer skin and provides an 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® 11 MR DEAN MOYER 756 CENTER ROAD CHIMACUM, WA 98325 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:56 AM To: Dennis Shields; 'Moyer @USC.EDU' Subject: Jefferson County Results of Consistency Review, Case MLA15-00018/ZON15-00009 Attachments: Results Report ZON15-00009 4-15-15.pdf To: Mr. Dennis Shields of Kelly Shields, Agent Mr. Dean Moyer, Owner Attached is the results report for a Consistency Review, Case MLA15-00018/ZON15-00009. We appreciate being of assistance. Please contact me if you have any questions. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW bilA SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 ,go sc)N .0 JEFFERSON COUNTY 2{ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment ` o Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcda.co.iefferson.wa.us '<II Nub SquareONE Resource Center i Building Permits 8 Inspections i Development Review i Long Range Planning April 15, 2015 By Email To: Dennis Shields, Representative dsnieidsgolympus net Dean Moyer. Owner Moyer(aZUSC.EDU Postal Mail: Mr. Dean Moyer 756 Center Road Chimacum, WA 98325 Subject: Results from Consistency Review of Proposed 20'x30'Agriculture Structure, 756 Center Road, Parcel No. 901143007. An application was received by the Department of Community Development on March 26. 2015 to conduct a Consistency Review for the proposed construction of an agricultural building using an agricultural exemption from a building permit. The application was accompanied by a site plan and a wetland report Moyer Parcel 901143007 Wetland Delineation Report. Marine Surveys&Assessments. March 23, 2015. The consistency review examined how the proposed project may be regulated under the Jefferson County Code. including land use regulations. applicable performance standards, development standards, Critical Areas and stormwater review. This consistency review especially focuses on code provisions for accessory uses(land use permits and approvals) and accessory structures (building permits and approvals) in areas zoned Agriculture. Agricultural Exemption Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands(AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as"Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests(CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as"[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials,the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, feed, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, MLA 15-00018/ZO N 15-00009 Novaxx Incorporated 1 unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to maintain farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building meeting the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay,grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, workshop, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Agricultural Exemption Conclusions: The building use does not meet the definition of an agriculture structure that would qualify for an exemption from a building permit. If there are changes to the building uses that you would like reviewed under Jefferson County Code, a revised application reflecting those changes must be submitted. If the structure were to be used only for storage in the sense of the definitions provided in the Findings above (exclusively for the storage of livestock,feed,and/or farm implements; to house farm implements, hay,grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products),then it would meet the agricultural exemption from a building permit. Critical Area Review: 1. A wetland report from Marine Surveys&Assessments (MSA) was submitted to DCD on March 26, 2015. 2. Results reported from MSA field work show the wetland edge and rating scores of 8 for Water Quality and 5 for Habitat. The more restrictive score is applied to the buffer requirements of Jefferson County Code. 3. MSA applied a wetland buffer of 75 feet. 4. The Habitat score of 5 applies a 110 foot buffer to an identified wetland boundary (Table 18.22.330(2) for Moderate Impact Land Uses). 5. The site was visited Tuesday, April 7, 2015 by Joel Peterson, Associate Planner, and Donna Frostholm, Associate Planner/Wetlands Biologist. 6. The wetland boundary was reviewed. Wetland hydrology was observed from Data Point#3 in a northeasterly direction up to the fence line below the house, before the gate. MSA met with Donna Frostholm in the DCD office to review these findings. MLA 15-00018/ZO N 15-00009 Novaxx Incorporated 2 Critical Area Review Conclusions: efferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) Maps from the Critical Area review are attached. With the delineation correction and the buffer correction, it appears that portions of the project could partially be in the wetland buffer. Additional Information Needed by DCD from Applicant: Please provide the following information: • Addendum to MSA's Moyer Wetland Delineation Report showing the revised wetland boundary and protective buffer distance. • Please provide a scaled Site Plan for the project which includes the boundary of the wetland edge, the boundary of the wetland buffer, proposed structure and the limits of construction activity. • If there are areas of disturbance in the wetland buffer, include in the Addendum the proposed mitigation actions in compliance with Chapter 18.221CC, Critical Areas. • Please provide building permit application forms and payment. These can be found on our web site: http://www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmentldefaut.htm. You may contact our Permit Technician if you need additional information,(360)379-4450. We have exceeded the base rate of the Consistency Review by 300 minutes. Documentation and invoice for $390.00 is attached. We appreciate working with you on your project. Please contact me if I can answer any additional questions. Sincerely, i---)- 2-1''5"."-'''---- ("--,Iciel Peterson Attachments: Critical Area Review Maps Time Report and Invoice MLA 15-00018/ZO N 15-00009 Novaxx Incorporated 3 INVOICE Date: 4/16/2015 Invoice ID: DCD15ZON15-00009 \� :()'� 0,�� JEFFERSON COUNTY `2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -c 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend, WA 98368 / 360-379-4450 I email:dcd @co.jefferson.wa us _�/off www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment �Hi MU Date Due: BILLING ADDRESS: 5/16/2015 NOVAXX INCORPORATED 2955 HILLCREST, STE 102 THOUSAND OAKS CA 91302 Cons ste c i n Review 390.00 Y Total Amount Due: $390.00 REMIT TO: Jefferson County DCD 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please return the above portion with your payment Permit Number: ZON15-00009 Consistency Review 390.00 Total Amount Due: $390.00 Payment is accepted by cash, check, debit or credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express) To pay by credit card, go to www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment, and click on the "Online Credit Card & echeck Payments" link on the left side of the page. (questions: call 360-379-4450) Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 3/26/2015 to 4/16/2015 for ZON15-00009. (Hourly Rate = $78.00) ZON15-00009 NOVAXX INCORPORATED 04/02/2015 30 Review 2015-03-31: planning huddle--bid official det not exempt: Joel Peterson consistency review--jmp 04/07/2015 100 Review 2015-04-07: (3hrs)site visit&correspondence with MSA--jmp Joel Peterson 04/16/2015 80 Review 2015-04-07: (3hrs)site visit, correspondence with MSA: Review Joel Peterson Report--jmp 04/02/2015 90 Review 2015-04-02: 1.5 hrs review, draft findings &emails to applicant--jmp Joel Peterson 04/16/2015 100 Review 2015-04-07: (3hours) Site visit for wetland verification: developed Donna Frostholm documentation for wetland revision. Donna Frostholm. 04/16/2015 80 Review 2015-04-07: (3hours) Site visit for wetland verification: developed Donna Frostholm documentation for wetland revision. Donna Frostholm. 480 minutes (8.00 hours) $624.00 Total 480 minutes (8.00 hours) $624.00 Zeik 4 .3`fv "G 1 4/16/2015 1\tidemark\data\forms\r DCD I e 0 , . ,.... - 0 0 ri, i i g. I .0 1 0 t I r, ,,, 0, 1 0...t i i I lo)t i' 4; ■ dr 7,. 2 AO VI E. „. 5 e. (.0 t 'n 41 ..4 ct a LL • i 2 & •.: .-...- a ti) a, --, 15 M ILI 1 1 ° 0 )- g ,... s e 1 a • :2-3 1 a -r Ct I al , 0 1 1 co ■.r- Z 1 cu. .,..-... < I c c? LI I A :Fol .41 1 I TO lii ,.... e t C LL.1 I-- Ilj 1 et laa •-• i 7...= 3 7 - ,- 1 3 U Ifi .41 x a a IA- i a ,, tr. ; Y 0 IS 1.,. -.4 N 1 ■ 1 % t.) ffi LIJ n s t 1 1 Y = - 4 : ..._ E --,, ti, .... t--- yr , 1-_-4 .7 _' t6- •-• a c r g -2 q2 B • t. vt IIIL < " c?--''.- I- Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma P. i .50"'42032 ,. ..._ � 4 . 4 =a•*5.002 90"5,0003' " . yet * n d 'So1142001 ..r •5U4143O1 . # .f ,',,,.' 3 � .��s�.rr a �s --. +s Legend °: Selected Features a ..:C_Roads i „a9 Parcels-H DNR FP Strom '� Classification t g, :90-44c$.?2 -16 3 f-fah Hab4* t -"' /vi N Nonlsa Haatiai ' `2 'o Np Non-fan ilaaiat•PeronneI 90 23<"-1 _. ;,,rt.�c.rt2 Na Nonvt:sh HaPlai-Scascncl i x Vi�'"i 123'4X33' J s-[n.cmtcr.ca Snarc::na "' _.01 ,t& , "' 2013 Aerial Photos " 10'23'0i4i { • .• ., 23101 / . . crl ,tr- . >1232 .8 . . cy,,,,,,„6-4.401 Creeit- s' , 90123201_,. 43 - -iii-0•9> .t!bvrCa+b Cows Se+na=GIS ,, «, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. Wed Air 15 16:52:35 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap'?ServiceNamc=ovmap&ClicntVersion-4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 1 of ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map '‘1 Arr4;:i 90114'ON ---90"42002 _4+161002 ., _ 901/42001 •*414301 "4400. 9041 VI 9011 x rs', i+11 tr t 0 ∎4.'.X1.1 90114300T' 9011430,5 0144002 901143005' .' `a;: •.. 90123201 901231*.+ 901232012 901237/311901231t+ r12320b5= *1232011 901232005 •` w• 901 AV.,r } 901231015? 123201$ . 10123201 iaps prodded try JdersmCaeey Co http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• .-,.. . ,,, 7 \______________ ,, ,.... ,,,t=,, t . ,, ..,....., , 46,,,,, !4115400: 43O.X2 90''4400' I Legend �° Selected Features ;+_._ 1�+'1 JCRoads i Parcels-Ft a ?C, 9G"4 7? Wetlands 1 V" 43F ,, €9 h a t_. SO"440,12 4 r'..,r�y�, S '2320 at"irk. '¥`23213`%; 90'23'009 i°c"CO2 0'2320'2 .._ = 2320 :-',_20? ik'23'M' 90'23'd:02 22'0'3' ► 5 i{'23"tv4 90'232005 9 '23'08 22'0'2 '23'0+5 SC42320'6 90'2320'9 u a'.r iinr-r1*C.01.'2.Lit::r�°r.-3- •:? 50211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Air• 07 09:24:52 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.csri.esrimap°Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&CIientVersion=4.0... 4/7/2015 Map Output Page 1 of I ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• ti q �.. ;,i Legend Selected Features 90''4200S iii '4' :4 `x•'42047 3C_Roads ..^----.w ._ l Parcels-H DNR FP Stream .'t'4200' Class ificaton 90"4 30'0 rail F F:cn Hanial � 17, N Non 1.st Ila6.la1 SJ�0•'43+.002 NP•Nan-f:sn liaa171 F•crenn,ai Ns•Ne.f sh II&tsl•Saranai ` fe S•tnwntorss Shore ns `' E. yp DNR Streams • •4sct�t / Too'4 agnES ..,!4 ,� G .,( TVaa 5 Cbrcnaaum Cpsek4 '+ 1� o Tva+a 950"44CY.Y2 $ I-' tog 3 r•*+'43005; Type I 90'2320'2 DNR Water Bodies 3232L0`,,go 2327 90'23'003 U F irr,Y IM S....2320' `' 90,23•0'S l SMP Shoreline x122`4'a 90`2320'8 .� Environmental c`'+ 5+.2320'4 Designations sIzt,xurdadofxa."I o-i Coati Cava Screws CAS 0 602f1 r I A.ual.c tEg Ca n hsrvan ry II;ah:nlensiy .f. ENat ura7 NA II 1 Fr.•-ly Aqua);: She-o;.na Ros:aonl s FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with espect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. Wed A•r 15 16:49:17 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 4/1 5/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 14 L. (S.1(x-4-j, Legend " • Selected Features .X_Roods Parcels-H ONR FP Stream Classification 90"5.1Cei• '"4400' 20 43O2 F•F 11=131 ■Y "Of N Nsn f.sh lists= t".•4,SC..>5 ifyi N n.f.st flan ii Pereims Ns Nsn fs5 klasSal Sssssnal 901'4X)24 meznIcr 21 Stare.ns . 3001 20* ,1 ONR Streams • ,Aee Tyga 4 Typo 4 2C."2320'0 Typ4 234ox ;13' "0,/ TY44 2 2320"2 /4/ Trp,3 90.2 320.• 20 2023'003 5,0-23 ' iv, Omar **'0. 32006 / 22 0'3 ' 1 DNR Water addles 20'2320:6 90'2120/ ' • ' 2.Urt.,\•1 20'22'0'2 123208 s 1'2 32,2.'6 \ 90'2320.9 [ No Dassgoallsall %Wm Wcsobd:N' rAti CrE,S SCSVCC5 GS 4111■1■60211 FE WA FIRMS M. A AN Xn.%1 Crirmr FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed A.r 15 16:49:35 2015 http://gisserver/servleticom.esri.esrimap.Hsrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion 4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map �� it \—_ t;A:414'.'4' / Ilk 1 . Legend 4 1 :4'14 .. Selected Features �� C .'.C_Roads 1s43�G1 Parcels-H -+ [MR FP Stream CfassificaGon F F n tlaaiat N N:n-f.zn 11 .1 a1 & ?GA232C''� . yt. ' Nan-izn flea 7sl Farce n,s•Allii' 0321}ii:a' '23%Vi !' '°''t '° _ cy;•2320'2 Ms Nan-f.n IIa5Aat-S asonII S•;nrentorad&nora..na , 9t3 2320 `i '232X5 mt de' l" Seismic Hazard r . r X023200,6 93'23'1)04 Ir 0'22101:- '- . , ,''"c32CC'8 93'2323'8 tx a ,,Um/-r..e. -,,,.,..,,c,..ft "o'r's'... _ 60211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Apr 15 16.50:32 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 4.......__________ 94'•atoai , 94''424 t } 3. 7ft11s1002 901'5*,003 w40" 9 - 1•l_LL Legend / 95-4305217-------*. Selected Features /J 1 3C Roads +Y W Parcels-H 90"4X06 E c 13NR FP Stream Classification 9G' 430t, 4 ,;,..•f•� 90''43005 -' 90t 343001 F•f:.ti IlaC aal 9 N Nan•f.sf:Hat.tm ff 901144052 F 90''43€.:05 + Ns, Non•fsn Hao.fal Parsnnu: " y Ns Non•f.an 11ab3a1•Sma-ansl •2324 0 /r S mtientorna Stia•c_ne 90"x '' ' 90'23200e 90'23'0Nr"\ Critical 90.2320'4 Aquifer Recharge 901232012( f Areas 4L'2320? 2320' 4 ), ` i 94"t32t'�OS I \ I 1 } 1c'\ I J S'1J5'U-UNK `3L3zY2f013 Y`_'4^.Ptl � I. � 90123200E L...J SARPA•SUSC 90'232045 90'232004 0 (! Si$L O SARPA A 90.22'4.2 9012320'8 �J ^ sARPA•UNK 90'2320'f 90'2324.9 \ ".I..rr.:rw•xat m:.c.:u-,=w•: :.',,.v.'..• ■1va+05'54 4 ' 211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Apr 15 16:51:07 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceNamc=ovmap&CI ientVcrsion-4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 2 of 3 Legend Selected Features iC_Roads Parcels-H DNR FP Stream Classification • F:sh tlablub N Nn f5 lD.11 • Np rfh Hat la:1 Pzrann.a: Ns Ncnfti Han:tat&Pisani. Cnty Zcnii M PR-SF Trxts i/ri Reaxtent l:S • Res-Pent a:1:t ra:Res:dant:al 1:20 M PR Sapa :y ▪ MP A Al sa;falr.:ry MPR•Flassrl Crr*.as Parts ant Racraat an al MPR Span Sr= 1111 Rural Foras1 Gon-lr=rcm:F=rest MtpaP F - 1 aMawr■nd r411 Aamart L.PC 111LMPRrysiab= AP 120 • Rurai V.ag=Canter aRaraarso Dana bta Lsp1 Znaustrrai M PR Roo:sat:L.n *bags A1cyr1 LPF L l Let crousroads•GC Cfassroals CC ▪ Cvas.urcads.NC AL 1:20 UGA Urban CeIrrrtscat UGA UrPan Lint:adularia, LISA MDR UGA 11DR USA Pb.: UGA LDR U GA V■sla r 0,2111 et!C rr.rr arza. MYR EON fir.nnan CF S01/1121.0 Con-arpreat F a mai M.n2ra Rasa roa Ow.xlay FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri,esrimap.Esrimap?ServieeName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 7 , ':',0"4X.I., .::::,•i•:,2 1 1., .," ......:: 1( ■ 1 I '. ILTS, . . . •.- .2 Legend er JO Roads _ , tr. Parcels-H (3 lig FezrOled leurrelets Heritage Points 9r.:■“43(2.09 Q. Spotted Owls A , Bald Eagle Nests SX.:••`4402k It Bald Eagle Buffers t Wiz-!Seto. 332 Buffer 2.2`,04 '2^".:' Q009 2320'2 Priority Habitats and 90' LSI:7i e: '-'042320"SiO*2-.14■X3 ':#2•2 :2°2. SO'2.VCCA '.,0'232C,C6 e.Ve'l/Ati- hie=4 44-;41,/ i — Sid.)*23'Q't, 1: '<"19r-t2e4 r le.'1 91r 23;20"4:.' 9,::(2 321.:■'9 4 C•01=11101111.11111eiDiti FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Apr 15 16:54:53 2015 http://gisserver/servletkom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName—ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 4/15/2015 Joel Peterson From: Dennis Shields <dshields @olympus.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 1:13 PM To: Joel Peterson; Moyer @USC.EDU Cc: Carl Smith; Colleen Zmolek; Marine Surveys; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Jefferson County Results of Consistency Review, Case MLA15-00018/ZON15-00009 Mr. Moyer has chosen to not move forward on this project. He feels it would just be throwing good money after bad. The check for the additional county charges will be mailed shortly. Do not proceed charging any more staff time to this project. Dennis Shields, VP Kelley Shields Inc. Agent for Mr. Moyer From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:57 AM To: Dennis Shields; Moyer @USC.EDU Subject: Jefferson County Results of Consistency Review, Case MLA15-00018/ZON15-00009 To: Mr. Dennis Shields of Kelly Shields, Agent Mr. Dean Moyer, Owner Attached is the results report for a Consistency Review, Case MLA15-00018/ZON15-00009. We appreciate being of assistance. Please contact me if you have any questions. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 °' n n�vv {n{vv en�vv ' oho oo° 0000° 44:4 is d v m 1 6' 4 E E 3 I '1 Y 3 3 a?i C c • t. 76 m 0 c g Q on G U o O ..1 c E m m ti ti u I a g a '^ , -� a`t. e'i33 O jj _- _ — I a a ci) a a a� a a w m a . � m ! '1 y a 1 = z z z [ry y 5 a x 6- V y o °o 11 O 2 On.-,— - O Ii CL i W ∎n 1.c) O ( C VC1 N N N trs u1 un U j S H cn N 7i A [� ' rd■ W OO LE Q i.— N '6:8, o .. zi 1 U Fa O m ? m m 1 . _ 5 i m w a C e3 U) U U LCI O° , ? 2 �' o 0 o O o 1 g ! W i m s m N a v, 0 Q z a M uY O N G O N N W O nn�1 H S ° O c o Q Q Q Q Q I°- Fes,. Q Q :: N CC ° ;J�' o co ��J Xo : oo .. a oOW i E LCD = o - o $' m U w Cu-d - ai ai ai c) m m 1 w ' :'• °i ? ' j J a n N c . o z m z m o° ` .a X W y F-}' 1-'� _ �° ti $2. .4 m d E ''' X U N Y m a N d a n C 4 u E E o Q o C 1 F U 3 -' '' O � 1 ;o iw �; c .Y .Y 2, .o- Q a L7 - Z r- a o'w H m d .E °c c v a?i e' ai 4 �, N v C~fJ asi Q a '_' v .4 y .� v C U El_ ? alai e G G 'o 'n ' - X N -�� d �� 4 Q6QU UooOw` w" ° • .= S AI 1131 O U I. Q O o< • V V S ( Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 3:34 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: The structure does not meet the purpose of the agricultural exemption and will need a building permit. You can speak directly to Carl if you need to. He has been out of the office today. I plan to be on site on Thursday with our wetlands biologist to check the delineation. It appears that the delineation used the updated rating scores from the Department of Ecology but didn't use our updated buffer tables that use Ecology's new system. We need to check, but an incorrect buffer may have been applied. There is a possibility that there will be some mitigation requirement applied to the project per Chapter 18.22 JCC. We need to check in the field. Would you like me to call you or the property owner before going out to the site? Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Qco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `' SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 2:12 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Carl Smith; 'Mary Hathaway' Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Hi Joel, I didn't hear anything back from either you or Carl on Friday. So what do we need to do to get going? I need to report to the owner. Thanks, Dennis 1 From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson©co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:58 PM To: Dennis Shields Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I'll bring this issue to Carl tomorrow morning. Be aware that we're not saying the structure cannot have electricity—that would need a Labor and Industries Permit. Plumbing, heating would require the appropriate permits from DCD. If the building is for someone to spend time making things within and do hobby things within, it needs to be structurally sound and safe and needs a building permit and inspection. It's a small price for safety, insurability, resale, and value-added to the property. If you want a climate controlled space to store wine (important for wine), it seems that you would want to build it to suit that use. The item regarding whether the beer/wine is for personal use is not an issue here. Because the property is zoned agriculture, there is a land use permit exemption and allowance for"Accessory Uses" on the farm. If your land is zoned Agriculture, accessory uses that support, promote or sustain the agricultural operation of the farm are considered "a matter of right". This is exclusively applied to land zoned Agriculture. There are guidelines and restrictions in the code for how this is applied, but the exemption allows commercial and retail activities outright on the farm without land use permits using this exemption. There is no such thing as a "Cottage Industry"when your zoned Agriculture. That comes into play when you're in any other zoning district. One small consideration that may not be an issue here, but exempt structures differ in their setback distances and will require a 10 foot setback from the residence instead of a 5-foot setback from the residence. Thanks. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonpco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields(a)olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 3:40 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Joel, 2 I think that's a good idea to have Carl weigh-in on this. This property is zoned agriculture and has been a hay farming operation for 100+ years, and it still is. The owner is elderly and he wants to grow an acre or two of barley and experiment with it making beer for his own use, and to grow some grapes for wine. I'm at a loss how this cannot be considered an agricultural use. It's a barn. When I discussed this with Colleen there was never a red flag raised that the proposed usage was not OK under the exemption. She said that the beer had to be for his own use to meet the exemption, which it is. When I came in later to submit the documents, she also said that we would need to have a wetlands study done, and that's what we did. If I had been told that we first needed to get the agricultural exemption clarified, I would never had paid $3,000 for the wetlands study. I'm sure that Mr. Moyer will be amenable to making his beer in his garage as he currently is doing if he can store it in the new building. If that's what it takes to get this going. But I still don't understand why the guy can't make his beer in there. And no electricity? How does a farmer go in to his barn in the winter dark without lights? We went through this same exemption process about four years ago with the county for a barn at the end of Blue Sky Lane. She was allowed to install some lighting. Thanks, Dennis From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson©co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:59 PM To: Dennis Shields Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I can't get into a back-and-forth email dialogue. I have provided you with our evaluation based upon your statements of how the structure is being used. I have copied Carl Smith, DCD Director, on this email and you may address him if you believe we have made an error. Please call at 360-379-4450. • According to our records,you were provided with a handout of the definition of the agricultural building permit exemption on December 2nd, 2014 (CAM14-00629). • You were provided the same information document on December 5, 2014 (CAM14-00631). • On December 31, 2014 you contacted our office and asserted that you met the agricultural building permit exemption and wanted additional information on how to proceed. On January 2, 2015, you were advised to apply for a consistency review for a review of your proposal. • We received your consistency review application on March 26, 2015. In the process of the consistency review, I contacted you today (April 2nd) to inform you that the proposed use is inconsistent with the definition of an agricultural structure that is eligible for a building permit exemption. • Your proposal describes that the building will be used for"canning garden produce", "processing grapes", "for wine, beer, canning". These are activities that would require the building to be constructed under a permit. You ask below, if the structure is just used for storage, will it meet the building permit exemption? Yes. There can be no heat, electricity or plumbing. 3 Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j peterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields@olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:47 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption So the fact that the guy is going to brew beer here makes him lose the exemption? He will not "inhabit" it any more than a farmer does when he stores his hay in a building, feeds his animals, parks his equipment, etc. Farmers milk cows in their barns. Is this not considered "processing" so they should lose their exemption?And isn't going to do anything with the public. He's going to store beer (which is a form of grain). This is totally ridiculous. I see buildings popping up everywhere out in the valley and the fact this poor guy is trying to follow the rules and he gets penalized. If he brews his beer in his garage and then stores it in the building is that now fall within the exemption? I take it that he can "store" but not "process" his grain? I need to talk with the building official who made this determination and to see the basis for his decision. I also need to know what my customer needs to do to comply with the exemption. If it means storage only in the building then so be it. Good grief, the poor guy wants a place to store his beer and let his wine cure. From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 1:22 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: Per your request, here are the findings relevant to agriculture: Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands (AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as "Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 4 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests (CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as"[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials, the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, fee, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to main farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building that would meet the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay,grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields@olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:15 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 And I might add that we've lost months in time on this project to get the wetlands report. Along with paying g p Y g the consultant $3,000. The owner agreed to pay for the report because we were understanding that we were 5 exempted from a building permit and the fees. Why, specifically (I don't want your opinion but the justifying facts) are you denying this is an agricultural building? From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, 6 CotTeen Zmofek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(a�co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.-4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis Joel Peterson From: Dennis Shields <dshields @olympus.net> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 7:42 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Carl Smith; 'Mary Hathaway' Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Hi Joel, Thanks for the explanation. I'm a building designer and have designed most of the 200+ homes we have built in Jefferson County over the last thirty years. I can assure you that the building will be constructed to code. I'm using the same upgraded specifications for floor loads, wind shear, etc.that I would use on our houses, which is considerably beefier than code-minimum. This thing is just a simple box. The last agricultural building we built did we did exactly as you described; we got a Labor and Industries permit for the lighting. And I am aware of the setback requirements. Please let me know Carl's response. Thanks, Dennis From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:58 PM To: Dennis Shields Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I'll bring this issue to Carl tomorrow morning. Be aware that we're not saying the structure cannot have electricity—that would need a Labor and Industries Permit. Plumbing, heating would require the appropriate permits from DCD. If the building is for someone to spend time making things within and do hobby things within, it needs to be structurally sound and safe and needs a building permit and inspection. It's a small price for safety, insurability, resale, and value-added to the property. If you want a climate controlled space to store wine (important for wine), it seems that you would want to build it to suit that use. The item regarding whether the beer/wine is for personal use is not an issue here. Because the property is zoned agriculture,there is a land use permit exemption and allowance for"Accessory Uses" on the farm. If your land is zoned Agriculture, accessory uses that support, promote or sustain the agricultural operation of the farm are considered "a matter of right". This is exclusively applied to land zoned Agriculture. There are guidelines and restrictions in the code for how this is applied, but the exemption allows commercial and retail activities outright on the farm without land use permits using this exemption. There is no such thing as a "Cottage Industry"when your zoned Agriculture. That comes into play when you're in any other zoning district. One small consideration that may not be an issue here, but exempt structures differ in their setback distances and will require a 10 foot setback from the residence instead of a 5-foot setback from the residence. 1 Thanks. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 3:40 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Joel, I think that's a good idea to have Carl weigh-in on this. This property is zoned agriculture and has been a hay farming operation for 100+ years, and it still is. The owner is elderly and he wants to grow an acre or two of barley and experiment with it making beer for his own use, and to grow some grapes for wine. I'm at a loss how this cannot be considered an agricultural use. It's a barn. When I discussed this with Colleen there was never a red flag raised that the proposed usage was not OK under the exemption. She said that the beer had to be for his own use to meet the exemption, which it is. When I came in later to submit the documents, she also said that we would need to have a wetlands study done, and that's what we did. If I had been told that we first needed to get the agricultural exemption clarified, I would never had paid $3,000 for the wetlands study. I'm sure that Mr. Moyer will be amenable to making his beer in his garage as he currently is doing if he can store it in the new building. If that's what it takes to get this going. But I still don't understand why the guy can't make his beer in there. And no electricity? How does a farmer go in to his barn in the winter dark without lights?We went through this same exemption process about four years ago with the county for a barn at the end of Blue Sky Lane. She was allowed to install some lighting. Thanks, Dennis From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson @co jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:59 PM To: Dennis Shields Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: 2 I can't get into a back-and-forth email dialogue. I have provided you with our evaluation based upon your statements of how the structure is being used. I have copied Carl Smith, DCD Director, on this email and you may address him if you believe we have made an error. Please call at 360-379-4450. • According to our records,you were provided with a handout of the definition of the agricultural building permit exemption on December 2nd, 2014(CAM14-00629). • You were provided the same information document on December 5, 2014(CAM14-00631). • On December 31, 2014 you contacted our office and asserted that you met the agricultural building permit exemption and wanted additional information on how to proceed. On January 2, 2015,you were advised to apply for a consistency review for a review of your proposal. • We received your consistency review application on March 26, 2015. In the process of the consistency review, I contacted you today(April 2nd)to inform you that the proposed use is inconsistent with the definition of an agricultural structure that is eligible for a building permit exemption. • Your proposal describes that the building will be used for"canning garden produce", "processing grapes", "for wine, beer, canning". These are activities that would require the building to be constructed under a permit. You ask below, if the structure is just used for storage, will it meet the building permit exemption? Yes. There can be no heat, electricity or plumbing. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonc co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW 1►A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 1:47 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption So the fact that the guy is going to brew beer here makes him lose the exemption? He will not "inhabit" it any more than a farmer does when he stores his hay in a building, feeds his animals, parks his equipment, etc. Farmers milk cows in their barns. Is this not considered "processing" so they should lose their exemption?And isn't going to do anything with the public. He's going to store beer(which is a form of grain).This is totally ridiculous. I see buildings popping up everywhere out in the valley and the fact this poor guy is trying to follow the rules and he gets penalized. If he brews his beer in his garage and then stores it in the building is that now fall within the exemption? I take it that he can "store" but not "process" his grain? 3 I need to talk with the building official who made this determination and to see the basis for his decision. I also need to know what my customer needs to do to comply with the exemption. If it means storage only in the building then so be it. Good grief,the poor guy wants a place to store his beer and let his wine cure. From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPetersonCa�co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 1:22 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: Per your request, here are the findings relevant to agriculture: Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands (AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as "Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests (CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as "[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials,the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, fee, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to main farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building that would meet the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay,grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 4 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Clco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 1:15 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 And I might add that we've lost months in time on this project to get the wetlands report. Along with paying the consultant $3,000. The owner agreed to pay for the report because we were understanding that we were exempted from a building permit and the fees. Why, specifically (I don't want your opinion but the justifying facts) are you denying this is an agricultural building? From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonc co.iefferson.wa.us 5 Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, CoCCeen ZmoCek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis 6 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 4:58 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I'll bring this issue to Carl tomorrow morning. Be aware that we're not saying the structure cannot have electricity—that would need a Labor and Industries Permit. Plumbing, heating would require the appropriate permits from DCD. If the building is for someone to spend time making things within and do hobby things within, it needs to be structurally sound and safe and needs a building permit and inspection. It's a small price for safety, insurability, resale, and value-added to the property. If you want a climate controlled space to store wine (important for wine), it seems that you would want to build it to suit that use. The item regarding whether the beer/wine is for personal use is not an issue here. Because the property is zoned agriculture,there is a land use permit exemption and allowance for"Accessory Uses" on the farm. If your land is zoned Agriculture, accessory uses that support, promote or sustain the agricultural operation of the farm are considered "a matter of right". This is exclusively applied to land zoned Agriculture. There are guidelines and restrictions in the code for how this is applied, but the exemption allows commercial and retail activities outright on the farm without land use permits using this exemption. There is no such thing as a "Cottage Industry"when your zoned Agriculture. That comes into play when you're in any other zoning district. One small consideration that may not be an issue here, but exempt structures differ in their setback distances and will require a 10 foot setback from the residence instead of a 5-foot setback from the residence. Thanks. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonPco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 3:40 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Carl Smith; Mary Hathaway Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Joel, 1 I think that's a good idea to have Carl weigh-in on this. This property is zoned agriculture and has been a hay farming operation for 100+ years, and it still is. The owner is elderly and he wants to grow an acre or two of barley and experiment with it making beer for his own use, and to grow some grapes for wine. I'm at a loss how this cannot be considered an agricultural use. It's a barn. When I discussed this with Colleen there was never a red flag raised that the proposed usage was not OK under the exemption. She said that the beer had to be for his own use to meet the exemption, which it is. When I came in later to submit the documents, she also said that we would need to have a wetlands study done, and that's what we did. If I had been told that we first needed to get the agricultural exemption clarified, I would never had paid $3,000 for the wetlands study. I'm sure that Mr. Moyer will be amenable to making his beer in his garage as he currently is doing if he can store it in the new building. If that's what it takes to get this going. But I still don't understand why the guy can't make his beer in there. And no electricity? How does a farmer go in to his barn in the winter dark without lights? We went through this same exemption process about four years ago with the county for a barn at the end of Blue Sky Lane. She was allowed to install some lighting. Thanks, Dennis From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:59 PM To: Dennis Shields Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I can't get into a back-and-forth email dialogue. I have provided you with our evaluation based upon your statements of how the structure is being used. I have copied Carl Smith, DCD Director, on this email and you may address him if you believe we have made an error. Please call at 360-379-4450. • According to our records,you were provided with a handout of the definition of the agricultural building permit exemption on December 2nd, 2014 (CAM14-00629). • You were provided the same information document on December 5, 2014 (CAM14-00631). • On December 31, 2014 you contacted our office and asserted that you met the agricultural building permit exemption and wanted additional information on how to proceed. On January 2, 2015,you were advised to apply for a consistency review for a review of your proposal. • We received your consistency review application on March 26, 2015. In the process of the consistency review, I contacted you today (April 2nd) to inform you that the proposed use is inconsistent with the definition of an agricultural structure that is eligible for a building permit exemption. • Your proposal describes that the building will be used for"canning garden produce", "processing grapes", "for wine, beer, canning". These are activities that would require the building to be constructed under a permit. You ask below, if the structure is just used for storage, will it meet the building permit exemption? Yes. There can be no heat, electricity or plumbing. 2 Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonc co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 1:47 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption So the fact that the guy is going to brew beer here makes him lose the exemption? He will not "inhabit" it any more than a farmer does when he stores his hay in a building, feeds his animals, parks his equipment, etc. Farmers milk cows in their barns. Is this not considered "processing" so they should lose their exemption?And isn't going to do anything with the public. He's going to store beer(which is a form of grain). This is totally ridiculous. I see buildings popping up everywhere out in the valley and the fact this poor guy is trying to follow the rules and he gets penalized. If he brews his beer in his garage and then stores it in the building is that now fall within the exemption? I take it that he can "store" but not "process" his grain? I need to talk with the building official who made this determination and to see the basis for his decision. I also need to know what my customer needs to do to comply with the exemption. If it means storage only in the building then so be it. Good grief, the poor guy wants a place to store his beer and let his wine cure. From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 1:22 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: Per your request, here are the findings relevant to agriculture: Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands (AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as "Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 3 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests(CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as"[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials, the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, fee, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to main farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building that would meet the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:15 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 And I might add that we've lost months in time on this project to get the wetlands report. Along with paying the consultant $3,000. The owner agreed to pay for the report because we were understanding that we were 4 exempted from a building permit and the fees. Why, specifically (I don't want your opinion but the justifying facts) are you denying this is an agricultural building? From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j peterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, 5 Coffeen Zmofek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek a(�co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.-4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis 6 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:59 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: I can't get into a back-and-forth email dialogue. I have provided you with our evaluation based upon your statements of how the structure is being used. I have copied Carl Smith, DCD Director, on this email and you may address him if you believe we have made an error. Please call at 360-379-4450. • According to our records,you were provided with a handout of the definition of the agricultural building permit exemption on December 2nd, 2014 (CAM14-00629). • You were provided the same information document on December 5, 2014(CAM14-00631). • On December 31, 2014 you contacted our office and asserted that you met the agricultural building permit exemption and wanted additional information on how to proceed. On January 2, 2015,you were advised to apply for a consistency review for a review of your proposal. • We received your consistency review application on March 26, 2015. In the process of the consistency review, I contacted you today(April 2nd) to inform you that the proposed use is inconsistent with the definition of an agricultural structure that is eligible for a building permit exemption. • Your proposal describes that the building will be used for"canning garden produce", "processing grapes", "for wine, beer, canning". These are activities that would require the building to be constructed under a permit. You ask below, if the structure is just used for storage, will it meet the building permit exemption? Yes. There can be no heat, electricity or plumbing. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j peterson(off co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `-A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:47 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption 1 So the fact that the guy is going to brew beer here makes him lose the exemption? He will not "inhabit" it any more than a farmer does when he stores his hay in a building, feeds his animals, parks his equipment, etc. Farmers milk cows in their barns. Is this not considered "processing" so they should lose their exemption?And isn't going to do anything with the public. He's going to store beer(which is a form of grain). This is totally ridiculous. I see buildings popping up everywhere out in the valley and the fact this poor guy is trying to follow the rules and he gets penalized. If he brews his beer in his garage and then stores it in the building is that now fall within the exemption? I take it that he can "store" but not "process" his grain? I need to talk with the building official who made this determination and to see the basis for his decision. I also need to know what my customer needs to do to comply with the exemption. If it means storage only in the building then so be it. Good grief, the poor guy wants a place to store his beer and let his wine cure. From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPetersoraco jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 1:22 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: Per your request, here are the findings relevant to agriculture: Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands (AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as "Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests (CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as"[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials,the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, fee, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to main farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building that would meet the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock or other 2 horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `iA SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields@olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:15 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 And I might add that we've lost months in time on this project to get the wetlands report. Along with paying the consultant $3,000. The owner agreed to pay for the report because we were understanding that we were exempted from a building permit and the fees. Why, specifically (I don't want your opinion but the justifying facts) are you denying this is an agricultural building? From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPetersonnaco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. 3 Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson @co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, Colleen ZmoCek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(cr�,co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.-4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshieldsPolympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, 4 I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the p roject? Thanks, Dennis 5 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:22 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Subject: RE: Findings Regarding Moyer Ag. Building Exemption Dennis: Per your request, here are the findings relevant to agriculture: Findings: 1. Parcel 901143007 is zoned Prime Agricultural Lands (AP-20). 2. The parcel is 14.8 acres in size. 3. The application describes the project as "Ag building for wine, beer, canning. All for home use." 4. The proposal was discussed in two Customer Assistance Meeting information requests (CAM14-00629 and CAM14-00631). The proposal was described as"[Client] wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden." 5. Per JCC 18.20.030(3)(b), accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in lands zoned Agriculture. 6. Accessory uses to agriculture (land use permits) on lands zoned Agriculture are considered a matter of right and are not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to specific limitations and provisions of the Code. 7. According to application materials,the owner is not planning to conduct accessory commercial or retail uses. 8. Per JCC 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(A), no county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock,fee, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to main farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. 9. The International Building Code is adopted by reference into the Jefferson County Code at 15.05.030 and also provides the definition of an Agricultural Building that would meet the permit exemption requirements as: "A structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay,grain, poultry, livestock or other horticultural products. This structure shall not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated or packaged, nor shall it be a place used by the public." 10. The use will include human occupation activities, processing grapes and canning garden produce. 11. On March 31, 2015 the building official determined the proposed structure does not meet the building permit exemption and is subject to the building code. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday,April 02, 2015 1:15 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 And I might add that we've lost months in time on this project to get the wetlands report. Along with paying the consultant $3,000. The owner agreed to pay for the report because we were understanding that we were exempted from a building permit and the fees. Why, specifically (I don't want your opinion but the justifying facts) are you denying this is an agricultural building? From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPeterson©co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th, to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolekCa�co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.-4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshieldsWolympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis 3 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:16 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: Sorry, but Colleen's information was in regard to an exemption to land use permitting for accessory uses to agriculture, not regarding the building permit exemption. Regarding Accessory Uses that support, promote, or sustain the agricultural operation: Accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively on lands zoned as agriculture. Those uses, as described and specified in the Jefferson County Code 18.20.030(3) are exempt from Land Use Permits, subject to some limitations and provisions contained therein. This land use exemption is a separate and distinct issue from the building permit exemption for agricultural structures. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Qco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW A, PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:11 PM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Why does this not meet the agricultural exemption? Colleen gave me information months ago and it seems that we clearly meet the exemption and the property is zoned agricultural. From: Joel Peterson [mailto:JPetersonftco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:53 PM To: Dennis Shields Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: 1 I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonc co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(a�co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 2 Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis 3 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:11 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Subject: Request Clarification on Curtain Drain Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I have a follow-up question about a note on your provisional site plan: "curtain drain to daylight into ditch". Is this to be installed by you as part of the project? Can you provide any further explanation? Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:Joel Peterson Sent:Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:53 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Subject: Regarding Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Dennis: I am doing the consistency review for the Novaxx, Inc. (Moyer) agricultural building at 756 Center Road and want to give you an update. While I'm still writing up preliminary findings, I wanted to let you know ASAP that the structure does not meet the building permit exemption requirements and is subject to the Building Code. It will need a building permit. Also, DCD will schedule a site visit as soon as possible, probably by April 17th,to examine the wetland determination. There appears to be a numerical error in the wetland report documentation that we are checking out. Let me know if you need assistance with permit forms or have any questions. I'll provide you with a report from the consistency review when the wetland information is verified. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonc co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:48 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer; Dennis Shields Subject: RE: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Dennis, I forwarded your email to Joel Peterson. Joel will be reviewing you application. Sincerely, Colleen ZmoCek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(c�co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields@olympus.net] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:33 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyer Subject: Moyer Ag. Building ZON15-00009 Hi Colleen, 2 I brought in the Wetland Delineation Report last week for the above project (ZON15-00009) and it shows that the proposed Ag building is outside of the wetlands buffer. I guess an earlier report, which I was unaware of, indicated the same thing back in 2007. I haven't gone through this process before so when can we get started with the project? Thanks, Dennis 3 Time: End Time: DEPARTMENT OF Begin COMMUNITY DEVELOP ' ENT 2z.11 ill 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 ~- `< Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment !� E.�- -mail:dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us pSN1 NO 0 Customer Assistance Intake Form Help us provide you the information you need by filling out this form. This is a public information form,the contents of this form is available to view by the public. • The first 15 minutes of staff time is free. Office Use Only • After the first 15 minutes, a minimum of one hour will be charged at the rate of$76.00 a hour with additional time over Receipt#: one hour billed in 15 minute increments. Check/CC#: • Please complete form and submit to the address or email Date Paid: above and a staff member will contact you. Received By: • Our go al is to respond within 14 calendar days of the request. n Dennis Shields NAME: DATE: 4 dshields @olympus.net -- __ EMAIL ADDRESS: 1 MAILING ADDRESS: �c lv TELEPHONE: (HOME) (CELL) PLEASE NOTE: Information and guidance provided through Customer Assistance is advisory only and is based on information provided by the customer. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues.Any discussion or information p rovided shall not bind or prohibit the Count y's future implementation or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations, land use plans, and other requirements. Your Signature: Monday, September 29, 2014 Colleen Zmolek From: Dennis Shields <dshields @olympus.net> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:47 PM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Mary Hathaway Subject: Agricultural Building Parcel Number 901143007 Attachments: Moyer Agriculture Building_0001.pdf; Moyer Agriculture Building_0002.pdf Hi Colleen, We're working with a customer who farms hay in the Chimacum valley (Parcel Number 901143007, address: 756 Center Road). He wants to start growing grapes for wine and needs a building to process and store his wine, and to can stuff from his garden. I don't think there is any question that this meets the agricultural requirement for permit exemption but I want to make sure that it also meets critical areas rules. Here are some details: • I've attached the county information about ownership, location, zoning, etc. • The property is around 13-14 total acres with about an acre or so adjacent to Center Road on the east side of the property that is 40'-50' above the flood plain. That's where his house is and where he wants to put the building. The bulk of the land is in the floodplain and where he grows hay and runs cattle. Chimacum Creek runs along the west side of his property and is about 1,100'-1,200' away from the proposed structure. I've enclosed a sketch. So what do we need to do to get going with this? Thanks, Dennis 1 F5- < 01/..... ___ ci. ..., 2 I CD ..... C .0 * I th CO 0 1 : 1 3 to o i 0 o t L c 92 co o 1 o - .E o J) as N 45 .`-..'En 2 Tti 0 N (x I 8 • a 1 ill m m o) t3 1 it.i • 14, 1-4 2? '6 Cl- r'3 m CB 0 cC 0 (r) c .° -- a> 0 CD 2 c(/)_c 2 ''- Tts (S, ;•"; o. 0 S 0 .-2 s- -,7_7(1) >, 0 C 2 3 i‘ '' r, i m ;4 b. ..= .....i 0 CD CI) c c!) 0 co -5 0 -6 ±-2 t .-- -ih -- ..4.• a+ el ,3 S 0 fe .fr -1;:" . cp .1- i.5 ,.- (I a) (.) -0 --, I- , E.t0QD . LI. _ N 04 ,s- cL I-- ---, < CL <C 0 CL CL U) (..) (-) E) () 0 C) 0 C) (#.) () C) C) C) C) 0 C) C) 0 C) - > ta„ ; ri Fl 0 Ci N N 0 N 0 0 0 0 El El 0 0 0 L i %.44i0.00 ‘br I I 1 C) W 0 7 i I 1 1 IS t Z7 tt N. < ..t I A 3 44 a i 0 Lo 11. :a; S q 1 , I 1 '0 I ..,... I 1, .. i I :je 1162H- 1 f2 -5 a) : c i 4 1 5 1 0 < 2 CI cY, , u61 :q n. co ; 4-'-,.' , t w 3 , t o %I o 1 03 %j 7 <al 8 z m 40 ..t.„ '.' ..., . as ----- 0 0 i Li or- ,. . z m 2 '4- cn as. k ----- c., ( o , >?. •'', ' :,(''' 1 m -1 o ( N C 6 ' gi ,.: Cf *; le *t*, LI-OR Pt' ilti 1 co E I ' 0 N., , . _ Anna Bausher From: Anna Bausher Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:07 PM To: 'dshields @olympus.net' Subject: Customer Assistance Inquiry Attachments: CAM14-00629.pdf Hello Dennis, I am responding to the inquiry you emailed Colleen on November 24th regarding parcel number 901143007. We have a new customer assistance service that I have describe below and is also on our website at http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/default.htm . Filling out the customer assistance form will be required in the future and will result in a quicker response when sent to the email provided on the form. If the agricultural structure is for private use and will not contain a heat source or potable water then as you say, it seems it would meet the agricultural requirements for the building permit exemption. However,you will want to verify this with the building department, I have attached a handout on the permit exemption for agricultural buildings.A critical area review will be needed though even if the building permit is exempted.Almost the whole parcel is mapped for wetlands.A wetland report with a wetland delineation would be required to determine if the proposed building was outside of the buffer.The wetland report would also determine the upper limits of shoreline jurisdiction.The proposed building area that is circled on the map you attached is outside of the flood area and therefore no requirements for flood would be needed. I have attached a copy of these maps as well. Customer Assistance Effective 1/1/2014 DCD's'coaching service'is provided through customer assistance meetings for direct consultation with our planning and building staff.This service was developed and previously subsidized by the EPA-funded Watershed Stewardship Resource Center grant over the last few years.With the grant ending,we continue to provide 15 minutes of free coaching to customers then charge an hourly Customer Assistance Fee for more extensive discussions,project guidance,and additional research. To get started,submit your completed CAM Intake Form to us by mail,fax,or email or bring it with you during scheduled drop-in hours(first come,first served): • Monday,Tuesday and Thursday 9:00 am to 12:00 pm • Wednesday 1:30-4:30 pm Depending on staff availability and the information you seek,your question may be answered'on the spot'or require advance payment and scheduling. The customer assistance fee is a minimum of one hour at DCD's hourly rate,not including the first 15 minutes of staff time.Additional time over one hour is billed in 15 minute increments. Upon submittal of a complete Customer Assistance Intake Form and up-front payment of the Customer Assistance Fee.Many customers find that this up-front expense saves them time,money and headaches in the long run! Why the Customer Assistance and Fee? Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 1 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausherAco.j efferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 2 Agricultural Buildings There has been confusion around what constitutes an exemption from the International Building Code for the construction of an agricultural building. An agricultural exemption is not authorized under the IBC nor the State Building Code Act, RCW 19.27 Structures.According to JCC 15.05.040(1), certain types of agricultural structures do not require a building permit from the Department of Community Development. (A) No county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, feed, and/or farm implements, provided said structures are:freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to maintain farm animals; do not contain a heat source,such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. (B)Agricultural buildings that contain plumbing other than that as authorized above must obtain a plumbing installation permit and health department approval. (C)Agricultural buildings that contain a heat source for an agricultural purpose must obtain a wood stove permit or an electrical permit as appropriate. (D)Agricultural buildings used for the storage of private automobiles, trucks, etc., which are not licensed as farm equipment,are considered garages or carports and must obtain a building permit. (E)Agricultural buildings used for the purpose of hosting members of the public for the purpose of retail sales of agricultural products or machinery constructed on-site shall require a building permit to ensure life safety and structural integrity. If an older agricultural building constructed under the building permit exemption for agricultural buildings is proposed for hosting members of the public, the building shall be brought into compliance with the building code, as determined by the building official. The change of use will also require planning review by the Development Review Division. (F)The building official shall judge whether a proposed structure,a structure under construction,or a completed structure violates this building permit exemption. A structure determined to be in violation will be considered a structure subject to the building code. (G)Temporary growing structures used solely for the commercial production of horticultural plants including ornamental plants,flowers,vegetables, and fruits are not considered structures subject to the State Building Code, Chapter 19.27 RCW, pursuant to RCW 19.27.065. WHEN PLANNING TO USE THE ABOVE EXEMPTION FROM BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, DOING THE FOLLOWING WILL HELP WITH YOUR PLANNING OF HOW TO BUILD THE STRUCTURE AS WELL AS PROPER SETBACKS & BUFFERS TO BE USED FOR THE LOCATION OF THE STRUCTURE. MUST MEET ALL ZONING SETBACKS AS WELL AS CRITICAL AREA SETBACKS AND BUFFERS - MEET WITH PLANNING COACH TO HAVE CRITICAL AREA & SHORELINE MAPS RUN FOR PARCEL ALONG WITH OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS AND BUFFER DISTANCES. ***Agricultural buildings that do not meet the Zoning, Critical Area Ordinance & Shoreline Master Program setbacks and buffers will require a and use permit. AND MUST BE BUILT TO CODE - CHECK WITH BUILDING DIVISION FOR CURRENT BUILDING CODE G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\BROCHURES\Agricultural Buildings.doc Updated 12/14/11 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• , i I ,i Sa 12647 , .. _ ,) lic,ill B ? i, 113t14 �'72 t ; t � 5.4:}x. ! 9L�4t5.0+53` ' .r 1t+a.w•-2; i -''ae :S::e,fin,n.- S�v '' 94$t$44i15 ,c f --------:'--- ----L--------- '-'r---' , ,,,,,,,,,,,,; ,F i i i4Q+ttl{}l, a I_ : co e pi i154X ;'� . ; Legend , x r JG Roads Parcels-H i ! r p t 2013 Aerial Photos 1Y °i' "t °eta o�z2 rO4. . „ ...t-,. .,,ii ,,_ .,. ,, ,ii4-t,,,...,,,, ..f , . . . .. . ,....... ,:orri Ccsr.a',e <zs_ _ S. - FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 02 10:31:53 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• { 901142005 4.,-41,2,..4 90114264 -1 w 45120 9(77'1 tit^, . 04 IZ:1L4 I 9077$4847`: 'i -t 943002 ( 90194400 .�I � . t 1 — 12-s Legend JC Roads i �J 901143076+ 1. — Parcels-H l i i °® 901143034 i i ii Wetlands QOM ',4 4 9091430.09 ( 901143'4'07 Cyr ' 90 1 1 4 40 02 O i 11434X#5' P 909232'•'0 01231009 '.t _-' •+7221®94 I 1 ...: i -.123201 { r: _ 901232012 9012310(12: ti 6223209 907232019 907239003 66 12 '30 22101 it ;, —� 901232406 901239004 I 1 i j 9092321.04: IF 7$ j 6123291'/= + 9012310 - ___1 909227092; i 909232018 ti:n:.3a.-cloi a::cks-.a-i Carty C�7,s&r.,us GSS n ` ....::,5717 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 02 10:29:46 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• • 01142(X8 901141004 9042041 _.__.. 901.4 . � 941151(342 1 901159003 901142am 901143010 .1 ..._ 1 i :-.. Y � —ill I 1 I 901144441 MA 9{71.54001 'I 9o11a3002 I l ll -- I 9411 -i __ I N Legend _.__.� .. , JC Roads Qt a... f3 i \;z, Parcels-k r —_ _-_... 90*.14'+�}ya .,," FE MA FIRMS } 901143001 i 1 1 I i 909143GtY9 0. ■ A _ 1 AN ____ - ..___ 901144002 O -; xst:1 —II IN Other ■ r "901232010 901231009 ,, 90'221014 i. ■ :2048 I '2''24',1 - i - `,: i 901232012 94/231002 r-----_____ 901232011 90+239003 90123'2419 ; I `. 2�_sxh #. .i. 50/221013 X9231404 901232005 i ._._ i 01232004 r_.__ 9012320'5- { r >`l 909231415 i 1 t ---' - 901232018 9)1221012 1232018 1! 9012320'9 Mac.•so:9Y_i _,, ,Ca..r.,:e:r_.Y„c'..a°i,tS ?itti======e.b311 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 02 10:30:03 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map s'::::::::::................................................................ :»:.: 90 1142}US 91141004 ufi:ii:?sa;ise:e?iia:c::nrii'Fa :ua a- : »r -:- ... w , 42047 i _ ',it:IffiEllilliElliiiii; ____ :n n ._.. i- _ ...._ :: .rx' I i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii �w:« mom':s.:�, ■ ....... n. .n:e-ri.°.iii is R' a' :F r ra•d:-.n,"3• s I x : a •^ i : : •s � . _ i it<: Legend Ri r , 901143042 Selected Feat• ures • ,:r::::... JC Roads y "••• ,i rY Parcels 44 .................................... '....... a DNR FP Stream M Classification ..-Fill.w:2it :::i'::m::u:r:::• ...........:: ..._.r .::.. . -- c r.. a/ F•F+sh flaGaat ::::: ::i"wit '"° N N fesh idaadat Ghlrri3 unL.raaY4 0 ,Aft""'"" .. .^.. sS. N fes1:Nabn at F I N . ..._iiilie...... .•r :. 9011440032 0,, ::.. TS ` Ns.Non�fish axonat.3oasanai• :::::::::::::: ._..........x ......................................a:r. ii•:�iii:��:i:::':::::::::::::::::::::«:... ..........._................_ i i ., S.MVO1114t1IX}$hPTCiMO I i SNIP Shoreline ........_ :-.T.::: :7.1 ._...._. 1I- --___ Environmental ss ::::: sstii•tits ,. .T.:.iiitse4_.....»............4....h•••••••••_....._..._.:.......... Des i nations 901232010 901231009 ..._ ...._..... ..-.._...:.......... I 1 Aquaric ................ms'A-..-..........».....»»ii::::. _'::::::::.:.: .:::::::::...........-........................._...._......._... 901230.'_;2 :P::i^'2cEi�Fiiii'iEiiSP'3iic5iii :: a : .......^..•...•_. :......................n Conservancy ''""1 901232011 901231003 J, High Ntnrrn.t Nal::rai . K 901231004 j 901232005 }+ NA f___' __�__.._..__ � Fr:wny A9uat:x 901231015: ............. .......... Snwc&nc Resdonl sal rattti:::i it ite»..: ._._t -, ..._....�?r"ita` i:iiii :::::i:::::::::::ai3:is?iii;;;E:T ..."..............._......_.................._........ • � _............_ 901232018 •:3:::::::::::::::. _ 9412320''3 alacZ oaAdsd a'Jcikxmdn Coavy card Servs..GlS ........ ...-•...... ...............::._ 0 . 61,i it FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 02 10:45:51 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 90,142006 901141004 '14204i ((I 1 -- -- 901142002 <{1 b,002 sf?tS•IXi3 ,y s ;x` 'ii i IF)I142001 I vi; $ 901343id14 ' ." 0.'.''„t L '%i ii 4 Y ! 0;. k Y-- - # 2 ,<1.54C°1 943344443 1. ` t t 001'42022 92,.,64003 p Legend JC_Roads s Parcels-H 4 Y'ribl Priority Habitats and '1 Species n - "'4?t. .. 90 4,0.2r `'fh01343{atF3� 0 ''',.r.-654,31.4‘.344* 'a ,*'LI ' i ' 80114402 0 SO 901* 1 901 431305 iI, 941232010 901233009 99'22'0'4 921232026 I _ 93/232014 i _..__ I -— 901232011 99'231902 231902 __ 901232011 901233443 9_'232011 90'232905 ,, 90'221013 l 90123'=r0;4 _.. - 11/1 901232006 99'214014 GC'2;12,.,,"S 901231015 _; 901232016 901221032 ?,"23296 .1' 901232Y9 V crz T.,cI'I •''c.-u'i Corr;Cu.r.-4+:x::ces oii 5:+11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Tue Dec 02 10:29:39 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/2/2014 Begin Time: End Time: t-1e. DEPARTMENT O F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -. I 71SPeriian �. lEt Port i a t LA38> % —. 1.tauf 4:4, r Tel:360,379.4450 j Fax:360379,2451 ♦N < Web:www,cc Tefferson.wa.us/cornmunlydevelopment F-!?1rlt.G .1 p '>..jrtf'2YSv,.Vv3 t'5 .1S/i 1 t` l Customer Assi Lance intake Form Help us provide you the information you need by filling out this form. This is a public information form,the contents of this form is available to view by the public. • The first 15 minutes of staff time is free. (Vice Ilse only • After the first 15 minutes, a minimum of one hour will be Receipt#: charged at the rate of$76.00 a hour with additional time over one hour billed in 15 minute increments. Check/CC#: • Please complete form and submit to the address or email Date paid: above and a staff member will contact you. Received By: • Our goal is to respond within 14 calendar days of the request. Dennis Shields w/ Kelley Shields Inc. 12/4/14 DATE: NAME: dshields @olympus.net EMAIL ADDRESS: 260 Kala Point Dr., Port Townsend, WA, 98368 MAILING ADDRESS: 3603857156 TELEPHONE:(HOME) (CELL) ►.� '�..1 PLEASE NOTE: 7 ut t vt o cod _uidel ce provided tr o h C:ustornet AssisWce Avisofy only- anti is based '9; information pPot de d ttty The Gusto Tres This not intended to t. an exhaustive review of ail potential issues.Ar 1 dtscusstott or information t„}VTheJ hriU not own or prcEThil lho County's fLiture iinotetroolatic,e or eiforceLreit of all co tit cbio laws of :egu at.0 r., No„te ern ents or 'anc s made by Coorty iepresentativea s Ttr in any wax relieve the aPP o ari° O his of h ;+.itJ to submit an application consisreA with ail rewvant iequirerrc nts of County. strife and rierat,ode., taws. regulations, land use plaos,and other wooitem nts Your Signature: Monday,Septernber 2 . 201 Begin Time: End Time: Customer Assistance Intake Form Page 2 of 2 Information Requested – List all questions and any information you need addressed. Attach additional sheets of paper if necessary. I've been working with Anna Bausher on the proposed constrcution of an agriculutrual building off of Center Road. I need to see what setbacks are required, particularly for — - - The proposed structure is near the house above the flood plain. See attached. am unavailable to meet until next Wecineriay, 19/10/14 Property Description 9-DIGIT PARCEL NUMBER(from Property Tax Statement):901143007 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 756 Center Road, Chimacum, WA, 98325 Office Tice Use Only 1 r a (,) o 0 'E C 3 Nst 0 re 3 i . :(7) 11) T 11 N '-'- *,... ......-' 0 010, c) < '5. cs, 7:2 .,.., . 0 J.- 0 (n ,,, i _c 0 .-■ a. co 2 fc- el o cl , cn o 2 0 c 0) r Fn. a) 0 NI § ....., 2 as us u) 7.-.• >, 0 E ..c ,..)- 1... a ,,,, ..c ci) ,_ i 0 ti) }- (1,) — - o c, cli r — u) 73. 0 . ,- '5 t--.. E (t) " C o >Ito (1),.._ _c° r-- 27C) , °0. 2 --Q-5u) ca5 ,,0 '-55„ F... Issici. Eo 1-'0 coc,_ ..1 0 V) a? ..c. c Ce a) k) 72 g c'el a) 0 I- ' : • to ,3 Q < k.--. co (-.) ..4. 0 1 2 ca 0 cl. CL. Ci) 0 0 (:',r) 2_) 0 (..) < p_ 4 e c. c. cs) n_ t— --) > - „1 (.1 - "At- . .... ,-, . Li f, I ,..„,„,,,,.!0„,,, -„1-6 -,., ,. ' ,. -1. ,.... - ...„. ,..', ...,ti.,' '''1,1;'.61":10'•,"- ,..'...._gif1441'''''',<''• ;,„ „" =•,,,:',''S;j2." ',-",', "' ''''."."‘,'-','''...1.'!';'4' ,-',",.:: '",':.,''''''';?` 7:'''c'''''r '4." ,:. '`1',,,:',, ,%"3'; '_ '',''''': '-'.r.,,,f,„-4.s'',,, 31, itA,•,'„ , ' ' .•;84 "'";' ,..c&iff.$le, :'''.: ‘,L;,.." ...„fti ■ : 4,*„.,',"',•i ','„ ,.., , 4, Ca. ' ' '' 1'''''''".'w- ,- .f6,6,„ .,, ' ';.1>.. 6.,,,,f,;.‘,,,- ,. • ''` ' -' ,.3, etit ,'' -'-z 2 1--- ,, ,,,..,' i C) ', i re) .:r 1 I **, * 7, . *4-0A.,..(sofitt, '""',' ,—,**,7, .--.i.,06,,.., 'iti: ,,' ,,,,., ,•••,.',:,,,-,,:•,;',"°,. ;,'4'.,`,,./-4,,,,,: '''':''''. ,s'' '`t ''''''' :4 ,_„,.., '''',,,,',,,,:,,,,A , _,.‘ eti, )i',,•,';::::','''.., ''' 1,4 'ft.:'' '-, -`"." i ' "--,, . '.,1:3,,,r";,, ,,,,f•,'-4, `,' , '' „- (1) CA ^... CCI (1) V . ',i : ''',;','•5 pr LI , <1, u t,"zt ■ > (f) 04 ' s ..• . , , , , = II .:t ,-• al cn 0 ..= ! ,: 0 ue- s... .,1'. = 0 0 ......,, ..., ..-. > 73 ...0 (TS 7.; 0. 107;3 C.I- ' 7 ' 4;..;-,,o,•.'"' ' f rr,.. . cd • E 1 = ,.. o , 0 IN C Q 0 • •■7. 1 , 0 ci) 1) 1 t' .....-"0" ......- 0, cd = . 1:1 ., ., .... ._.- -t- spict(iolliall.:1 111,,,r1rintolr)63, p_, 4 ammo. p-7-.- Aft 1 Vci •-- Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 7:56 AM To: Dennis Shields Cc: 'Mary Hathaway'; 'moyer @usc.edu' Subject: RE: CAM request Parcel#901143007 Attachments: Agricultural Buildings.pdf;wetland GIS_12052014083054.pdf Hi Dennis, I am responding to the CAM questions regarding setbacks and buffers on parcel number 901143007. A critical area review will be required even if the proposal is exempt from a building permit. See the attached handout on the building permit exemptions. A wetland delineation is required for the critical area review. The proposed structure may be located within a wetland buffer. See the attached Jefferson County GIS mapping on wetlands. A wetland delineation will be required to determine the categorization and boundary of the wetland. The delineation will determine if mitigation is required. The wetland delineation will also determine the upper limits of Shoreline Jurisdiction. The proposed structure is outside the FEMA flood hazardous area. Center Road setback is 30 feet measured from the edge of the right of way. For residential use the side yard setback is 5 feet measured from the parcel line. Is the proposed agricultural building for personal use or is it for a commercial wine processing? If the proposal is for commercial processing a cottage Industry permit would be required. Sincerely, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(c�co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address vi1l be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 12.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, December 04, 2014 9:37 AM To:#dcd Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyerd Subject: CAM request Parcel#901143007 1 Please let me know when I can come in and meet. I will be available any time starting Wednesday of next week (12/10). Thanks, Dennis Shields 2 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ii■Fu+'d277- lG : 1 crs3Z f ` i i y 5'Ct2 90, sr_ 3 I 11W1.."'C''.14 sn ',7''1}`x ••'• 7I . iCfJ sit_ 7 UO2 __—J I Legend ,_ l�`t3; r "— —" a Selected Features C3 JC_Roads ,�...1 *,. �� 7�_i j Parcels+I ® Wetlands a ).11 30•..7 Cl) i ---- ,,I t, H.MOD WM' -- G 1 Lr.t L, t L{L_` i"22.x3'2; Afar ixa:•itd ar.:c�c•-san Co:cn Cc r a=x:r.x's GS C mac...--.-.=-,=fr.217 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Dec 05 07:37:01 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=o... 12/5/2014 Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 1:16 PM To: 'Dennis Shields' Cc: 'Mary Hathaway'; moyer @usc.edu Subject: RE: CAM request Parcel#901143007 Hi Dennis, Please submit a permit application for a consistency review. Make an appointment with Sally to submit the application for land use review. Submit the following forms, • Master Permit application • Site plan • Wetland Delineation • Stormwater Calculation form. • $234 fee for Consistency Review. (fee is based on 3 hours if the review of the permit and the delineation takes longer the applicant will be invoiced.) Sincerely, Colleen ZmoCek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(c�co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCDvMr vibrant economy,preserve is©ucommunities d comunrties and a healthy fenviran� County by promoting a environment. \li e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 1?..56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:00 a.m.-4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:35 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: 'Mary Hathaway'; moyer @usc.edu Subject: RE: CAM request Parcel#901143007 Hi Colleen, So where do we go from here to move this along? Do you just need a site plan?The structure does meet the agricultural exemption and no, there is no plan to process anything commercially. Just let me know what's needed and I'll bring it in. Thanks and Happy New years, Dennis 1. FSent:rom: Colleen FridayDecember Zmolek [mailto:CZmolek @co.j52014 7:57 AM efferson.wa.us] , , To: Dennis Shields Cc: Mary Hathaway; moyer@usc.edu Subject: RE: CAM request Parcel #901143007 Hi Dennis, I am responding to the CAM questions regarding setbacks and buffers on parcel number 901143007. A critical area review will be required even if the proposal is exempt from a building permit. See the attached handout on the building permit exemptions. A wetland delineation is required for the critical area review. The proposed structure may be located within a wetland buffer. See the attached Jefferson County GIS mapping on wetlands. A wetland delineation will be required to determine the categorization and boundary of the wetland. The delineation will determine if mitigation is required. The wetland delineation will also determine the upper limits of Shoreline Jurisdiction. The proposed structure is outside the FEMA flood hazardous area. Center Road setback is 30 feet measured from the edge of the right of way. For residential use the side yard setback is 5 feet measured from the parcel line. Is the proposed agricultural building for personal use or is it for a commercial wine processing? If the proposal is for commercial processing a cottage Industry permit would be required. Sincerely, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek cr co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will he received Icy dui.tetterson County e trail system and rnmy be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter P2.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:00 a.m.—4:30 p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Dennis Shields [mailto:dshields @olympus.net] Sent:Thursday, December 04, 2014 9:37 AM To:#dcd Cc: Mary Hathaway; Dean Moyerd Subject: CAM request Parcel #901143007 Please let me know when I can come in and meet. I will be available any time starting Wednesday of next week (12/10). Thanks, 2 Dennis Shields 3 -z.6' Boa . .. 3Ui a)/.0e7 + ON C, )0 O Ruwt13 — k 0 I-I—a—A- �.).1..$ o� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 ti �n �� Tel:360.379 4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment E-mail:dcd ,,co.jefferson.wa.us �11`y11ING�O -2i6 D ► PERMIT APPLICATION 1� [E C [ V E Steps in the Permit Process: nor { -Review application checklist to ensure all information is completed prior to submitting appkicatiori.' 2 6 20 5 -Make sure septic has been applied for and water availability has been proven. 1i Ls 1 -Make an appointment to meet with the Permit Technician by calling 360-379-4450. -This is not a standalone application;it must be accompanied by a project specific su lenier?taf fil Eldk"�COUw pp f�ELOPMEM -Fees will be collected at intake. Additional fees may apply after review and payment is required before permit is issued. For Department Use Only Building Permit# Related Application#s: MLA# Site Information a Assessor Tax Parcel Number: q 01 1,43 O U 1 Site Address and/or Directions to Property: -75(c, - z. 12- rrk-tw.rd w WIN 9 Qc32-J Access(name of street(s)) from which access will be gained: l G c�ri ma gd 1)-p Present use of property: Wt l� - .fit G.9.,t GU C--7-11 f Description of Work(include proposed uses): a. - 1(-D P ■ r 1,.a ti ,A-LA- F 2 140 AA"; u 5 t Wastewater-Sewage Disposal This property is served by Port Townsend of Port Ludlow sewer system? YES NO _ _ If not served by sewer identified above, identify type of septic system below: Type of Sewage System Serving Property: Septic Septic Permit#: .se-p8- - -4 5-3 _ Community Septic Name of System: Case It Are other residences connected to the septic system? Additions or repairs to sewage system: Is it a complete or partial system installation: Complete _ p Partial _ Has a reserve drainfield been designated? Yes No No _ Date of Last Operations&Maintenance check: Attach last report to application Describe or attach any drainfield easements,covenants or notices on title,which may impact the property: 7-CW 1 —cow The authorized agent/representat.the primary contact for all project-related qu ns and correspondence. The County will mail/e-mail requests and information about the application to the authorized agent/representative and will copy(cc) the owner noted below. The authorized agent/representative is responsible for communicating the information to all parties involved with the application. It is the responsibility of the authorized agent/representative and owner to ensure their mailbox accepts County email(i.e.,County email is not blocked or sent to"junk mail"). Applicant/Property Owner Information Property Owner: Name: ki i j R x 1 NGs I2--Poil-, :b — 1) e.19-7 it/1,0'f e72 -r(L Address: 2q.5 S IAlLLG(Le iT 5-r 10 7-- i 1 OU 51 -p Of3 S C4 9/ 3O z Phone#: _ 550 S — 5 5$ — 26:A9 E-mail Address: �p G c.e„U J sC , LS(J t,L. — Please contact Authorized Agent/Representative with project info. (select only one). Property Owner Signature: ,ti S x07„ Date: I/i ' /I Note: For projects with multiple owners,attach a separate sheet with each owner(s)information and signatures. Applicant: Authorized Agent/Representative Of other than owner) Name: 14 ti.1.el SW E"ZA 5 1 c- Address: �+ Address: 26,o (%iK -. P f 7-, roc i--5ti-i--b £/4- 7 6 C Phone#: E-mail Address: l t Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO YES Engineer Architect Surveyor Contractor Consultant Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO YES Engineer Architect Surveyor Contractor Consultant Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO YES Engineer Architect Surveyor Contractor Consultant Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO YES Engineer Architect Surveyor Contractor Consultant Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Attach additional pages if necessary Builders Statement The signer of this statement certifies that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Print Name: Date: 1 0 • P, 'j.)( •-)lwei So c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT / �� � 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,VV1�98368 � � �r�- TeL 360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 1 �— 1' � �' ti �C Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/comcnumtydevelopment i �� E-mail:dcd a co.iefferson.wa.us i ` i te. fir ; MAR 262015 �� 46W I N CO.— SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL 13LDGPI ;;; ry"" n-COMMUNITY DCVCI_C}f'MCNT For Department Use Only Receipt#: _� Date: Related Application#s: Payment#: Site Information Owner Name: 'Dt2.4.1_,) 'y►.t,uc-i(Cry/(, Assessor Tax Parcel#: 9 pl t43 (gyp-7 Type of Building New Replacement Relocated Addition Repair Demolition * *A separate permit is required Select One: Single Family Residence Modular Other S ..° list Proposed Building/Project Number of floors #new bedrooms existing total bed #new bathrooms existing total bath Heat Source Select all that apply: Electric Heating Oil Wood Propane Enter the square footage(sq/ft)that applies in each field: Structure Existing Sq/Ft Proposed Sq/Ft ICC Valuation (Office Use) Residential/Commercial Main Floor Residential/Commercial Second Floor Additional Floors- heated/unheated Basement-unfinished Basement-finished space or habitable Detached Garage-heated/unheated Attached Garage-heated/unheated Garage 2nd fl-unfinished storage Garage 2nd fl-finished space or habitable Carport-2 walls or less Deck-uncovered Covered porch --■7 Other(shed, barn, pole bldg,etc.) /I (9 00 Estimated Cost of Project(Required): $ / $ • List existing buildings on property(i.e. house,garage,accessory dwelling unit,shed, barn, mobile home,other): All Existing Buildings on Property Use Builders Statement The signer of this statement certifies that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assu in the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Print Name: Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his or her knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this 1 application packet may result in making any issued permit null and void. Signature:�g. �.• r ` Print Name: UEMAA. rn,py t Date: '5i 2-5 15 For Department Use Only Building Permit Fees Building Base Plan Check Review Land Use Review $234.00 Septic Review Potable Water Technology/Scan $19.50 State Fee Other Fees Shoreline Exemption Zoning Zoning Other New Address Road Approach 0 Total Fees Z�J�iSr Receipt# Date: Cash/Check/CC: Et/Lib )a /)S- U aa9-- • eo )? ;,0 Ikea% g �1 g- ko DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �j ---- c,, �y 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 1 Im\ Cif r L? M r Tel 360.379.4450 � Fax 360.379.4451 I, f ���� . Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communi develo.ment `�:` ) tS P m E-mail:dcd(c�,co.jefferson.wa.us i � o� MAC 2 6 2015 i ; !L �sHlNG� .—� ;i STORMWATER CALCULATION WORKSHEET JEFFERSON COUNTY ) _j'"T.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANTNAM �/�E: 1" OL+7C/ DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as "small," "medium," or "large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan, if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel L?j acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet S(( 2-Bo sq/ft ■ Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative)and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing,grading,filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry,and salal; herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert 3/4 acres or more of Construction site for structures (0 Q Q sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield, septic tank, etc. — sq/ft Circle: Yes N'o Well, utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 21/2 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway, parking, roads, etc. sq/ft ■ Circle: Yes No Lawn, landscaping, etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance sq/ft Cut t5 Fill ( (cu/yd) Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios,driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving,gravel roads, packed earthen materials,and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. stormwater calc worksheet—REV.10/20/2014 1 • • STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING 6n wry Structures(all roof area) G00 sq/ft Structures(all roof area) It 50 sq/ft Sidewalks — sq/ft Sidewalks t't,0 sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios '5-C/O sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway, parking, roads,etc sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads, etc ;5-00 sq/ft Other — sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New ( )O sq/ft Total Existing Z cone:, sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* I-1 'too----- sq/ft *This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. I, The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v.REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage:0Ol) % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No . FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes,the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of "medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements#1 through#5—and for"large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet,I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. / / vie/hes:27 _., -5/2s- (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPR'TATIVE SIGNATURE) / (DATE) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM LARGE REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No stormwater calc worksheet—REV.10/20/2014 2 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 • • Parcel Number:901143007 03/26/2015 Owner Mailing Address: NOVAXX INCORPORATED 2955 HILLCREST,S I t 102 \t5 (IX.I)1 b THOUSAND OAKS CA 91302 Site Address: 756 CENTER RD CHIMACUM 91302 Section: 14 School District: Chimacum(49) Qtr Section: SW 1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum(1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 0211 Planning area: 91302 Sewer: Drainage: Bank: View 1: AP-20-Commercial View 2: Zoning 1: Agriculture Zoning 2: Zoning 3: Sub Division: Land Use Code: 8300 91302 Property Description: S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL N0=901143007 3/27/2015 • KELLEY SHIELDS INC Page 1 of 2 0 6 Home Inieio en Espaiiol Contact Search L&I " i A-Z Index Help My Secures I.&I Safety Claims&Insurance Workplace Rights Trades&Licensing ClikWashington State Department of Labor & Industries KELLEY SHIELDS INC Owner or tradesperson 260 KALA POINT DR KELLEY,DENNIS M PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 360-385-7156 Principals JEFFERSON County KELLEY,DENNIS M,PRESIDENT SHIELDS,DENNIS A,VICE PRESIDENT Doing business as KELLEY SHIELDS INC WA UBI No. Business type 600 579 660 Corporation ILicense I Verify the contractor's active registration/license/certification(depending on trade)and any past violations. Construction Contractor Active. Meets current requirements. License specialties GENERAL License no. KELLES1150LF Effective—expiration 06/06/1985—06/06/2015 Bond CBIC $12,000.00 Bond account no. SC8396 Received by L&I Effective date 05/06/2002 05/28/2002 Expiration date Until Canceled • Insurance GENERAL FIDELITY INS CO $1,000,000.00 Policy no. BAG0007583 Received by L&I Effective date 06/01/2010 06/02/2010 Expiration date Until Canceled Wesco Insurance Co $1,000,000.00 Policy no. WPP1026482 Received by L&l Effective date 05/30/2014 06/02/2013 https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=600579660&LIC=KELLESI150LF&SAW= 3/27/2015 KELLEY SHIELDS INC Page 2 of 2 Expiration date • 06/02/2015 Insurance history Savings No savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. Lawsuits against the bond or savings No lawsuits against the bond or savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. L&I Tax debts No L&I tax debts are recorded for this contractor license during the previous 6 year period,but some debts may be recorded by other agencies. License Violations No license violations during the previous 6 year period. Workers' comp Do you know if the business has employees?If so,verify the business is up-to-date on workers'comp premiums. L&I Account ID Account is current. 499,736-00 Doing business as KELLEY SHIELDS INC Estimated workers reported Quarter 4 of Year 2014"7 to 10 Workers" L&I account representative T2/HAN CHUNG(360)902-4713-Email:CHUK235 @Ini.wa.gov Workplace safety and health No inspections during the previous 6 year period. J Washington State Dept.of Labor&Industries.Use of this site is subject to the laws of the state of Washington. https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=600579660&LIC=KELLESI150LF&SAW= 3/27/2015 • MOYER PARCEL 901143007 WETLAND DELINEATION s REPORT March 23, 2015 1, E SUS 44.%): 1?---"\,...*"-----'---( -- CP • '',1 te,,. S SESSl ' rn) 1E"MARINE SURVEYS Et ASSESSMENTS --_._ 521 Snagstead Way 11-11' Port Townsend WA 98368 ` / MAR 2 6 l' 2015 !' (360) 385-4073 - uL.. ,_, 1 marine.surveys.inc @gmail.com JLrcERS N CA,Ui4fY L«_�.PEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 2-3 III.METHODOLOGY 3-4 IV.BACKGROUND INFORMATION 4-5 • V. WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS 5-6 VI. WETLAND EVALUATION 7 VII. SUMMARY 8 VIII. REFERENCES 9 Figures 1. Site and Vicinity Map 10 2. National Wetland Inventory Map 11 3. NRCS Hydric Rating by Map Unit 12 4. WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Map and Report 13-14 • Appendices A. Wetland Determination Data Forms 15-24 B. Jefferson County Soil Survey 25-34 C. Wetland Rating Form 34-48 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation l • MMim • PARCEL 901143007 WETLAND DELINEATION & ANALYSIS 756 Center Rd Chimacum,Washington I. INTRODUCTION Marine Surveys and Assessments(MSA)has been authorized by the landowner Dean Moyer and Kelly Shields his agent to perform a wetland delineation at the property located at 756 Center Road, in Chimacum, Jefferson County,Washington. Construction of a 20' x 30' agricultural • building adjacent to the existing home is proposed on the site. The delineation was performed on March 5th,2015 to identify wetlands on the site. There currently exists a permitted 3 bedroom home on the property built in 2007 and a 3 bedroom septic installed in 1993. The subject property is located in the SW'/4 0 f Section 14, Township 29N,Range 1W(Figure 1. Vicinity Map). According to the Jefferson County Assessor,parcel 901143007 is 14.82 acres (645,559.20 square feet) in size. For the purposes of federal, Washington State and Jefferson County jurisdictional oversight,this wetland delineation followed the methodology outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0)U.S. Army Corps of Engineers May 2010. WAC 173-22-035 states delineations should be done according to this manual and supplements. The changes became effective March 14,2011. The sections below provide: (1) an introduction to the site; (2) a description of methods used in the field delineation; and, (3)technical results. II. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The property is accessed via Center Road which forms the eastern property boundary. Adjacent 901143004 borders this parcel to the north and east. Parcel 901143006 borders the remainder of the north line and to the west across Chimacum Creek. Parcel 901143005 borders to the south. All adjacent properties are agricultural lands. There is a residence on the east side of the property • at the top of a small rise with a slope of 16%. There is an existing outbuilding at the northeast corner of the property inside the mapped wetland area. The existing septic drainfield is also within the mapped wetland boundary(see Figure 1.) A fence line at the base of the slope is —64' west of the house. From the fence west the topography is generally flat sloping slightly toward the creek. At 75 feet a gentle depression begins. From 75 feet to 143 feet west of the fence there was standing water at the time of inspection. West of 143 feet the ground becomes more level and there is a change of color in the vegetation. Center Road and the home-site are sources of run-off were as these are upslope from the wetland. The slope continues to rise across Center Road. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 2 • I The majority of this parcel, as well as the adjacent properties, is a hay field and considered Prior- converted Cropland(PC), wetlands that were converted from a non-agricultural use to cropland prior to December 23rd, 1985 as defined in the Joint Guidance from the Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)and the Army Corp of Engineers(COE)on Conducting Wetland Delineations for the Food Security Act of 1985 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (February 25, 2005). This parcel has been in continuous agricultural use since before 1985. Vegetation on this location prior to being cleared circa 1900 was primarily wooded with the dominant species being spruce(Picea sitchensis FAC), cedar(Thuja plicata FAC), hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla FACU)and fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU)as well as thickets of crab apple (malus fusca FACW)and hardhack(Spiraea douglasii FACW). (Bahls, Rubin 1996) I III. METHODOLOGY Consistent with procedures detailed in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2011) (2011 Manual), preliminary information was gathered on the project site prior to the field review and delineation. General information sources included: 1974 National Wetland Inventory(N WI)maps, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1975 Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington(USDA) 2013 Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map (DNR) 1979 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, (WSDE) 2009 Jefferson County Unified Development Code Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas 2014 State of Washington 2014 Wetland Plant List US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington 2014 Update. (Hruby, T Washington State Department of Ecology) Field Delineation The methodology used for this wetland delineation followed the methodology outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region 9Version 2.0) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This document is the wetland delineation manual that is used in determining wetland areas when applying state and local government regulations under the Shoreline Management Act and the Growth Management Act in Washington State. The extent and location of wetland was determined during field work performed on March 5th, 2015. Field work was conducted under fair conditions with an ambient temperature ranging between 45 and 52 degrees Fahrenheit. The time of year and recent precipitation history were Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 3 0 • considered in assessing the extent of the suspect wetlands presumed to exist on site. Specific field methodology used in determining the extent and location of wetland areas include: 1)As part of the initial project site reconnaissance,the site was walked to determine the general extent and location of potential wetland areas; 2) Wetland and upland sample plots were established in the identified potential wetland areas and in the adjacent upland area; and 3) The extent of the wetlands were located with a GPS unit. • The project area was investigated and data was collected at 3 transect locations. Data was collected at 3 sample plot locations. Each sample plot included a data form completed for a wetland area and a form completed for the corresponding upland area. Data collected at each sample plot was entered onto a Routine Wetland Determination Data Form (USACOE Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast-Version 2.0). IV. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Jefferson County Soil Survey The soil survey of Jefferson County indicates eight onsite soil types, (USDA, 1975) Hydric soils mapped on this property include: Sh and Sm Semiahmoo muck Th Tisch silt loam Bm Belfast silty clay loam. Non-hydric soils include: SaB San Juan gravelly sandy loam • CfC Cassolary sandy loam EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam A/C Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. (Figure 3.NRCS Hydric Rating by Map Group) A more detailed description of the onsite soils can be found in Appendix B. Jefferson County Soil Survey Text. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 4 • • National Wetlands Inventory The USFWS NWI map(online wetlands mapper) shows a large wetland extending the length of Center Valley covering the majority of the subject parcel (See Figure 2. NWI Map). The wetland is classified by the NWI according to the Cowardin classification system as PEMAd Palustrine,EMergent vegetation,A- seasonally flooded, drained and is considered a Priority Habitat and Species (PHS)corridor by Washington Fish and Wildlife Service. (Figure 4.) Our observations during the site visit showed standing water in places and a high water table. V. WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS • The wetland identified on this property is part of a large mapped wetland extending the length of Center Valley (See Figure 2.) The water levels are controlled by both surface runoff upslope on the east side of the property and flooding from Chimacum Creek on the western boundary. The wetland reaches throughout the hayfield to the west of the homesite with a boundary just west of the base of the slope below the residence. This wetland could potentially filter pollutants out of ground water before entering Chimacum Creek. (Ground-Water System in the Chimacum Creek Basin and Surface Water/Ground Water Interaction in Chimacum and Tarboo Creeks and the Big and Little Quilcene Rivers, Eastern Jefferson County, Washington. USGS 2004) The wetland's edges were marked with a pink flag at each transect. Vegetation The vegetation at this site is absent of the original native species due to the conversion of the entire wetland area to farmland circa 1900 (Water Quality Monitoring Report Chimacum Creek Clean Water Project G0700093, 2001, Jefferson County Conservation District, Glenn Gately). Both the upland and wetland vegetation were dominated by unidentified planted pasture grass. Also found in the herbaceous layer:Ranunculus repens (FAC), Cirsium arvense(FAC), Plantago lanceolata(FACU),Holcus lanatus(FAC),Juncus effusus(FACW), Taraxacum officinale (FACU),Though there was no tree or shrub layer on the site,beyond the eastern boundary by data point T1 we found Rosa sp.Salix sp. Oemleria cerasiformis and considerable • Rubus armenicus. Soils The soil profiles within all wetland test pits were consistent with the A 11 hydric indicator: a layer with a depleted or gleyed matrix that has 60 percent or more chroma 2 or less, starting within 30cm of the soil surface and having a thickness of 15cm. Test pits T2w and T3w consisted of silty clay loarns in the upper portion with a matrix chroma of 10YR 3/2. Redox concentrations of 2.5YR 4/6 and 5yr 5/8 were present respectively. The top 6" of test pit Tlw consisted of fill for equipment parking by a previous land-owner. The first layer from 6"to Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 5 • • 81/2"we found a sandy loam with a matrix chroma of 10yr 3/2. Below this layer the matrix chroma was 10YR 5/2 in holes Tlw and T2w, with redox 60-80%at 5YR 4/6 and 5YR 5/8. T3w from 3.5"to 18"had a matrix chroma of 10yr 3/1 with 40 percent redox concentrations of 5yr 5/8. Tl does not have a corresponding upland test pit because the wetland extends to edge of the property. Beyond the property boundary is a hillside covered with fill of rocks, bricks and garbage. • fx_ %,;l 7;.r 5 l: • :ice a •#�,re e•> .'r p The upland soil pits of T2 and T3 were sandy loam and matrix chromas of 100 percent 10yr 2/2 and 10yr 3/2 in the top 7"to 8". Below this to 18"the matrix chromas were 10yr 3/2 with faint redox concentrations of 2 to 5 percent. Hydrology • Wetland hydrology is indicated by soil saturation/free water in the test pits during the growing season. The sample plots within the wetland area revealed free water in the test pits with ponding and soil saturation to the surface. Upland test pits did also show indicators of temporary inundation. Given the time of year and precipitation this is well within the norm. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 6 • • VI. WETLAND EVALUATION According to the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington 2014 Update (Hruby 2014), if the wetland being categorized has more than two HGM classes within the wetland boundary it is classified as Depressional. Given the slope on the east side, Chimacum Creek on the west side and depressions with standing water/high water table in between, we rated this wetland as Depressional. Ikr - t .114" * - r ,gip a .4 L_. The wetland boundary was identified by noting hydric soil indicators,positive wetland hydrology and presence of FAC vegetation although most of the current vegetation was planted and there is very little difference in vegetation between wetland and upland. The line was defined • primarily by the presence of hydric soils and hydrology. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 7 • • VII. SUMMARY This wetland report documents the presence of a Multi-HGM Wetland meeting the criteria for a Category II Depressional Wetland within the subject property. According to Table 18.22.330(2) of the Jefferson County Code the wetland requires a 75' setback. This buffer falls onto the southeast portion of the subject property. See Figure 1. Site Map for the approximate location of the wetland and associated buffers. We trust this information is sufficient for you at this time. Thank you for choosing Marine Surveys and Assessments as your environmental consultant. If you have any further questions or • planning requirements for this project please do not hesitate to call. Respectf. ' submitted, Mari s and Asses Me: Amos and Soozie • hol Staff Wetland Specialists /7/ Amy Le an Senior Biologist, Owner • _. .. Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 8 0 • VIII. REFERENCES BahIs, Peter and Judith Rubin, 1996. Chimacum Watershed Coho Salmon Restoration Assessment. Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Natural Resources Department. Cowardin, LM., V. Carter,F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service document F W S/OBS-79/31. 84pp. Washington D.C. Gately, Glenn, 2011. Water Quality Monitoring Report. Chimacum Creek Clean Water Project G0700093. Jefferson County Conservation District prepared for Department of • Ecology Water Quality Program. Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Title 18, Article VII. July 2006 Hitchcock, L.C. and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. 730 pp. Hruby,T., 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington - Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #04-06-025. Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1998. GretagMacbeth. North Windsor,New York. Simonds, F. William, Claire I. Longpre and Greg B. Justin, 2004. Ground-Water System in the Chimacum Creek Bssdin and Surface Water/Ground Water Interaction in Chimacum and Tarboo Creeks and the Big and Little Quilcene Rivers, Eastern Jefferson County, Washington. Speare-Cooke, S., 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society. 417 pp. • US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Jeffeson County Area, Washington. December, 2013 US Fish and Wildlife Service.National Wetlands Inventory. 1978 Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997. Washington State Wetland Indentification and Delineation MAnual. Ecology Publication#96-94, Olympia, Washington. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 9 • Figure 1. Site Plan and Vicinity Map '72'499'26-W 4a201N 1224815W �"' Tom.. Dean Moyer Site Jefferson County Figure 1.SiteNicinity Map 756 Center Road Parcel#901143007 V etland Delineation performed on March 5,2015 Chimacum.WA 98325 S14 T29 R1 W TAX 74 Surveyed by:Meg Amos,Soozie Nichol tc_ t., 1 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western W A 2014(D 1.4 and H 1.2) r Legend Nstr� _ ` Data Points(03/05/15) -Wetland Delineation(03/05/15) qq .,aa ,,-) Proposed building ff Moyer Wetland t Service sayer Credits Soa-cc, "i'sri 0 Tti,GAbe 75 Wetland Buffer t GeoEye,i•cubed Earti• -a G9o_3 .,.,.ONE0...2..s 0 50 100 County Parcels Feet tY �I --: . 400 500 • Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 10 0 Figure 2. National Wetland Inventory Map ,,._i ; ..a ... "W 12296'0'W 122.45'551N 122°45'5014 127'4545'N Dean Moyer Site Jefferson County Figure 2.NWI Mapped Wetlands 756 Center Road Parcel#901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5.2015 7. Chimacum,WA 98325 S14 T29 R1 W TAX 74 Surveyed by Meg Amos,Soozie Nichol • F ` . . t•-_ .. .;t b f E } — --- '- �j _< ......—.,...--..--«,.._ ---,.� ,y, Y*`s� t'ai'a.. , r , .44., .- . Legend • Data Points(03/05/15) 3 t "' : ? g j, ? -----Wetland Delineation(03105115) m t +p',' ,-e i ,, 4 -ce p, Proposed building , p � . Moyer Wetland s e ce S a _og a? e .+ t 's . .- 7 x F 75'Wetland nd Buffer L p Ae -. e ,, e) # r � ss opo 11 S Jse Co !..r t Y # County Parcels n a r, , + =etlands ,1 f b le, eta k 'M USFWS NWI v l PEMAd(Freshwater Emergent Wetland, Fee ' "a:` ' 1.600 2.000 s xe *. • 1 0 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 11 0 • Figure 3. NRCS Hydric Rating by Map Unit Dean Moyer Site Jefferson County Figure 3 NRCS Hydric Rating Map Unit 756 Center Road Parcel#901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5 2015 Chimacum.WA 98325 S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 Surveyed by Meg Amos Soozie Nichol • Legend • Data Points(03/05/15) -Wetland Delineation(03/05/15) NRCS SSURGO Soils Data AIC - NMI Bm 11111111 Crc EvC may Sae Se Sh Sm AN Th /` County Parcels /Y a 7.00 ;a F- .00 en 000 aoa Marine Surveys &Assessments y Moyer Wetland Delineation 12 0 Figure 4.WDFW Priority Habitat and Species Map and Report Dean Moyer Site Jefferson County 9 ure 4:WDFW PHS Map and Report ' : 756 Center Road Parcel if 901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5,2015 Chimacum,WA 98325 S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 Surve ed b :M Amos Soozie Nichol a I 40 t jay- ..€ _ A ... v + w z e 1:19,842 ofi"n March 21,2015 0 ois os PHS Repoil Clip Area 0 AS MAPPED TOWNSHIP o o21s oss " SECTION w.nn7«i Een aawm4 caesraim• r PT sw,.Ern aei +a�^aaEVaeanmrrrc.vaW LN QTR-TWP 13 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation f • 40 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PRIORITY I IABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT SOURCE DATASET: PHSPIusPublic REPORT DATE: 03/2112015 4 52 Query ID: P150327165149 Common Name Site Name P Scientarc Name rwmy Area Seine Dataset Occurrence Type Accuracy Federal Status Source Record More Information rURl1 State Stands SensAwe Data Source Enttty Notes Resolution Source Date Mgmf Recommendations PHS listing Status Geometry Type Cohe Ch,macum Creek Oncorhynchus kisutch FISHDIST Breeding Area NA 5:413 Breeding area "; Na http'r witty.wa goy wan Mversty sec'soc tarn AS MAPPED Cohn http-"wM' d .wa goy pubhcahons'pub.Op, PHS LISTED .. Orx ortrychus kisutch Chsnatum Creek Occurrence SASI NA Cand+dade N 3270 Occurrence WOFW Frsh Program http'wdlW.wa N:A AS MAPPED • gov:wlmAiversryaoc sod.htm Lines hap.,wWwwa goy:publications'pub oho, PHS Listed Cutthroat Chunacum Creak Oncmhynchus clack, SASI Occurrence NA Not Warranted Occurrence N WDFW Fish Program 7040 h N A AS MAPPED ap.,:wdfw wa gpvwlmAiverSrysOGSOC.htm Lines Fall Chum hap-`wdfw wa.goy publications pub.oho', PHS Listed Orcorhynchu5 kola Chimacum Creek Occurrence NA FISHDIST Occurrence:mgratidm NA N 534 N.A AS MAPPED hap-wdlw wa gov:what diverstysoc sec.htm Lines PALUSTRINE http'wdtw.wa gov.publuatanepub.ohp? PHS LISTED N A Aquatic Hanna! NWIPOLY NA N Aquaac habitat N..A US Finn and Mate Service AS MAPPED Polygons PALUSTRINE hap:r w^v-acy wa- PHS tasted N A NWIPOLY Aquatic Habitat NA NA Aquatic habtat N NA US Fish and Wildlife Service AS MAPPED Poygons Pink Salmon Odd year ham'w^^'wr�y wa. PHS Listed Oncorhynchus get:uscha FISHDIST Creek Occuirrtence.M gration NA WA 53415 Occurrence migration hoe:wdlw wagon Yam diversty:socsoc htm NA AS MAPPED Lines htfp:`sedtw wa.gov:pubricahons Pub.PhP' PHS LISTED Common Name Ste Name Priority Area Sobntarc Name Source Dafaset Occurrence Type Accuracy Federal Status Source Record 59nslfwa Data Source ry Sy Mora kttormafion tURli State Status Resotuhon Notes Source Date Mgmt Recomrnendatmrrs PHS Estate Status Gaametry Type Resirtpet Coastal Cutthroat Cturnaarm Creek Oncorhyrchusclark, FISHOIST Occurrence rrrgrahon NA N a 5340? Occurrence mgrehon N hap-'wdtw.wa.goNvan tkversty sod son..fin r: ^.Aaap:,.. I,.,5 httP;..*yew.wa.gov-publicationsoib.phpv PHS LISTED Summer Chun Chimacum Crook Orwornynchus Seta FISHDIST Occurrence lfgrahon NA NA n.:-rrence mgrahon N 53411 N'A AS MAPPED df w.wa.goy wtm:divorsty socsoc.htm >".fw nal Ft' -LlItr �i:__ Trumpeter swan CHIMACUM CREEK Cygnus Trumpeter swan afar PHSREOION 903563 •.: N A • N WA OeVt.of Fsh and LY,kii:te hap:wWw.ca. v AS MAPPED Polygons Waterfowl Coc®rgrations 90 PuDlcations;pub.php> PHS LISTED CHIMACUM VALLEY Regular Concentrator, 1:4 nide?Quarter N:A H t Regular coneenhation WA tempt.of F,.sh orb W k)k+e PSREGION 9SRE N AS MAPPED Polygons Minter StaMhead hap:•wdhe tya..gov:pubricatimns'PUb.PIP PHS LISTED Oncomynchus mytess FISHDIST Creek B` ng Area NA NA area N 53416 http:'wdfw,wa. wwkrt N;A AS MAPPED go rttlivd.:sty,socsoc tam Lines hap''wgfw.wa gov:pupicatronbpub pimps PHS LISTED • Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 14 $ 9 Appendix A. Wetland Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region CO/County I''f' -.,- ,, ' Sannuting Date t.,.. C1,i,::,..,'..1., Applicant/Owner - ,- iv':as--( State Sampiing Point ii,estqatorts) ..t. ... ,7,-■ r-..., - Section township Range - _t_ti.: .); R I W I andform(5alslope terrace etc) L Local relief(concave convex.none) '' - -r Slope 1%) Subregion ilRFI) i.,---1'.'''i im ap.i.--i.-At:° Tat ''') ' - -' ' ' L01,9 ' ' ° ''''7 Datum Soo Map Unit Name '- '--, .i...- v rt / " _ NW'classification Are climatic;hydrologic conditions on the ode typical to tins time of year,Yes 'iv No Of no explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation 7 Soo -"--, or Hydrology °:-.4.. significantly disturbed" Are'Normal Circumstances present" Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic" Of needed explain any answers or Remarks) • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampfinspointlocations,transects,important features,etc. EirlydrophyfiC Vegetation Present' YeS No T . Hy&ic Soil Present' Yes T No la the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes 2,c No ) Wetland Hydrology Present, Yes Remarks 1 VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. —- -- Absolute immetant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot Size ._ . 1 %Cover Species' Status Number of Dominant boemes That Are OBI. FACW or y AC Al 2 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata - (8) 3 Percent of Dorminant Species 4 That Are 0Ell,FACW or I-AC h (NB) =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet. Sapling/Shrub Stratum iPlot size i Total%Cover of Multiptyby _ 2 OHL species x 1= 3 I-ACVV species ‘i _ 4 FAC species _ x 3= 5 t ACU species x 4= =Total Cover UPL species x 5= ttvg_atrazgm ilSot size I Column totals _ (A) (B) 1 2 Prevalence Index=BM= - .- 3 _ 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators' ,,..., ; 4 '. _ I Rapid Test for Hydrophytit Vegetation C ) 2' Dominance Test is'50% _ 3 Prevalence Index is S3.0' 8 4 Morphological Adaptations (Provide supponing ,:_ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) to -_ 5 Wetland Non Vascular Plants Problematic Hydroonytic Vegetation'(Explain) =Total Cover indicators of hydnc sod and wetland nyttrOlOgy mist __— V./00y Vine Stratwn (Plot size be present unless disturbed Ti problematic • 1 __, ---I 2 Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Present? Yes ... No Remarks ----' US Army Corps ot hngineers Western Mountains Valleys and Coast-Version 20 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 15 • r SOIL Sampling Point r Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Colorimoist) % —Type' —Toe Texture Remarks 'Type C=Concentration D=Depfetion RM.Reduced Matrix,CSsiCovered or Coated Sand Grains 'Location PL=Pore Lining M.Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Htstosel(At) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A10, Flisfic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) _ Black Hisao(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except PaLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF121 ,, Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix iF2) Other(Fxplain in Remarks) ' Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) __ Depleted Matrix(F3) __ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(FS) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and 2,_ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl) Depleted Dark Surface(ET) wetland hydrology must be present Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) Redox Depressions(F-8) unless disturbed or problematic • Restrictive Layer(if present): Type 1 Hydric Soil Present? Yes ' No Depth(inches) HYDROLOGY , Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary lndicator__sLm_n____1 _irnion of one required,check ali that app_W Seconda Indicatos(2 or r_.J______10 .re re ti,,,_w•egl Water-Stained Leaves(139)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MIRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2i 2,, Salt Crust(811) __ Drainage Patterns(810) Saturation(A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates 03131 Dry Season Water Table iC2) , _ Water Marks(131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C 1 i _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living - Sediment Deposits(132) Roots(C31 Geomorphic Position(D2) Drift DePoSits 183) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Shallow Aguitard(D3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilted Algal Mat or Crust 1f341 Soils tC6) __ FAC Neutral Test(05) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) , Iron Deposrts 185) (LRR AI ,_ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Surface Soil Cracks(BSI Other(E xplain in Remarks) Frost Heave Hummocks(071 _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7i ' Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(1381 ' Field Observations: Surface Water Present'? Yes ?)'!-',, No _ Depth(inches) ' Water Table Present? Yes — No Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present'? Yes No _ Saturation Present? •(includes capillary fringe) Yes V.' No _ Depth(inches) _t_ :Descnbe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitcinng well aerial photos-b-re-vMd;inspections) 4 available Remarks . US^�Corps*E nginee" Western Mountains Valleys and Coast Version z" Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 16 • • SOIL Sampling Point"._- "'').'_ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth _-----Malnx ---- Redox Features (inches) Color(mast % Color mast) % Type'1_. .�__._ YPe..._ loc' _T.. Texture Remarks i ' • Type C=Concentration.D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix.CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location PL=Pore Luting,Me Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to an ERRS unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': I Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A70) Histic I'pipedon(A2) ___ Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) __ Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(El)(except MLRA 1, _. Very Shallow Dark Surtace(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(At, _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) __ Other(Explain in Remarks) 1 Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Matrix(F 3) chick Dark Surface(Al2) Becton Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators or tydroptytrr vegetation and I —.. Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present. j Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Rectos Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer(it present): j..--_.___---- 1 Type Hydre Son Present? Yes x-.. No Depth(inches) —'— . Remarks 1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology rof gy Yd Indicators: -- _. 1 Pnmary Indicatorsjminimum of one required check as that apply_ Secondary Indicators(2 or more requited) WaterStained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(139)(MLRA 1,2, ' _ Surface Water(Al) _ MLRA 1,2,4A.and 48) _ 4A,and 48) High Water Table(A2) _ Salt Crust(811) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) T' Saturation(A3) __ Aquatic Invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(CZ) —, Water Marks(B7) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C 1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Oxidized Rh¢ospheres along Living Sediment Deposers(82) Roots(C3) __ Geomorphic Position(D1) Drift Deposits(B3) ,_- Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Recent bon Reduction in Tilled __ Algal Mal or Crust(134) __ Sods(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1- Iron Deposits(B5) __ (ERR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR Al — Surface Sod Cracks(B6) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present° Yes No Depth(motes) j Water Table Present° Yes - No Depth(inches) _-._,- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes k� No Saturation Presenly 1 • (includes capillary fringe) Yes 1. No Depth)inches) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge.mondonng well aerial photos previous inspections) if available _�- I Remarks I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys.and Coast—Version 2 0 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 17 • 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Protect/Site '==j" J r, ,r-, e City/County _ Samplaig Date Applicant/Owner _ ' ' );! State f),)11 Sampling Pont investigatons) i ...) ,.r,_,; •,,_ Section Township Range )..„ i I " !„,„, 'N.1 "-• i wither/xi(hisslope terrace etc/ )- Local ferret(concave convex none) l!,,,,_ ) ',Slope(%) Subregion rt,RR) i i- I l ; .....,:f Lot/.. r ,, )" Long! i ) '' .)-''))) Datum //) 1''f:' Soil Map Una Name .• - r„, ,i L ' ti F 1 i NVVI dassrfication Are climatic!hydrologic conditions On the site typical for this time of year? Yes ,X _ (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation L„ Soil ,'• or Hydrology ‘)"- signrficantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ..)--". No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic'l of rended explain any answers in Remarks 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site,ma showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. 'myerophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Wetland Soil Present? Yes 4_ No _ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ,X7.. No • tland Hydrology Present? Yes k, No I _ Remarks ) l ) _ VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. -— Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot sae / %Crantr §Jastpate kitaloi Number ot Demount Species , ' 1 That Are 081,FACW or FAC (A) 2 , Total Number of Dominant 3 1 Species Across All Strata (13) 4 I Percent of Dominant Species I That Are 081. FACW or FAC • INS) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size , ) Prevalence Index worksheet. 1 _Total%Cover of Multiply by 2 OM species x I-.) 3 FACW species x 2= _ FAC species x 3= . 5 FACU Species x 4= =Total Cover UPI.species _ , 05 Herb Straturn (Prot sue i Column Totals (A) r Bi . . . - 2 . Prevalence Index=WA ' I 4 ,: _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators' ...._ ,..'- 1 Rapid Test for Hyclrephytic Vegetation .) 6 . . 1 ' 2-Dominance Test is>50% 3-Prevalence Index Is s3 0 8 4 4 Morphologrcal Adaptations (Provide supportmg 9 _ data in Remarks or on a separate snee) 10 5 Wetland Non Vascular Plants 11 7 Problematic Hydrophybc Vegetation'(Explain) Total Cover 1 -- 'Inthcators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must W.•.y Vine Stratum (Plot size I be present unless disturbed or problematic • 1 1 Hydrophybc .9-Total Cover . Vegetation %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Present? Yes i No ---, Remarks US Army Corps at Engineers Western Mountains Valleys and Coast-Version 20 • Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 18 • • SOIL Sampli Point Profile ic _�_�_------___ Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(mast) % Color(moist) % ' Loc' Texture Remarks , ir • Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM.Reducert Matra C$4 Grams Covered or Coated Sand Gras 'Location PL Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Sod Indicators. (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils' Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(S5) 2 cm Muck(A 10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(1.1 2) _ Black H�shc(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F 1)(except MLRA 1) Very Shadow Dark Surface(T F12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(12) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Alt) Depleted Matrix(F3) ._ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) __ Redox Dark Surface(16) -Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and __ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) —_ Depleted Dark Surface(17) wetland hydrology most be present. Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer(if present): Type. _—_ __._. I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No fx- ■ Depth(incheh) . Remarks —..-- ---_.... HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one rewired.check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more requiredl __ Wafer-Stained Leaves(89)(except Water-Stained Leaves(89)(MLRA 1,2, _ Surface Water(Al) __ MLRA 1,2,4A,and 48) _ CA,and 48) High Water Table(A2) Sat Crust(8111 Drainage Patterns(810) Saturation(A3) v Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) _ Dry-Season Water T able(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl i Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Oxidized Rhrzospheres along Living Sediment Deposits(132) Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) I Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(03) '.. -_- Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled - Algal Mal or Crust(84) Sores(C6) (AC-Neutral Test(05) I ...-_ _.. Stunted or Stressed Plants 11)1) __ Iron Deposits(851 (LRR Al __ Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR Al Surface Soil Cracks(86) LL Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Frost Heave Hummocks(D71 _ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) �" Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 1881 Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches) _ Water Table Present'? Yes No Depth(riches) _. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ; No Saturation Present? • (includes capillary fringe) Yes No Depth(inches) !!Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge.monitoring well aerial photos,previous inspections),if available ,. w____ Remarks. _ _�- _—� US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys.and Coast-Version 2.0 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 19 e WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site..------ - City/County: Sampling Date ____. hpplicantuOwner. _.___.._—_� State. Sampling Point .vestigator(s) • ._..�—_.-______......Section.Township.Range.. Landtorm(hiilstope,terrace.etc.): Local relief(concave..convex,none)- Subregion(LRR). ._. Lat. Slope(%) Long' Datum: Soil Map Unit Name NWI Uassfication. Are climatic t hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes - No - -,(If no,explain m Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances'present'? Yes No Are Vegetation. Soil T—.or Hydrology—A naturally problematic'? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydropnytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_ Is the Sampled Area • • Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes - No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: ---. --- - ----. VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. _.__._— of Dominant Indicator I Dominance Test worksheet: _Tree Stratum (Plot size- ) % _ Sttu s -_ I Number of Dominant S -- 2. That Are OBL.FACW,or FAG 3 --- ----"--- Total Number of Dominant 4. - - Species Across All Strata (B) =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species ?aDiLr!Ahtub Stratum (Plot size: ) That Are OBL.FACW,or FAC' (NW ._.____._. Prevalence Index worksheet:._.__._._ : 2 Total%Cover of Multiply by 3 OBL species xt_ F 4. I ACW specxrs x2 = FAC species x 3= . FACU species x 4 e _ =Total Cover Hetb Stratum (Plot size UPI.species ______ x 5= 2 Column Totals __(A) _(8) i A 3 — "— — Prevalence Index =BtA j 4 Hydrophytic V e getation Indicators: --� 5 ! _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7 3-Prevalence index is 53.0' _"_4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting _.._-_—_ I data in Remarks or on a separate shee*,, 9 -- —. _ Ii__5-Wetland Non-Vaszr)ar Plants' tp. _Problematic Hydrophybc Vegetation`(Explain) 11 'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland h dro y logy must =Total Cover Dissent,unless disturbed or problematic Woody Vine Stratum 'plot see - '—`------ • 2 _._—_ Hydrophytie - --� Vegetation Total Cover Pf°eBnt? Yes No A Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ' ---- Remarks. — US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 20 • • . SOIL Sampling Point, Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix _ Redox Featur45 .�__.. --7.- (incttgsl Color(moist) % Color(moist) °.5 True Loc Texture Rernarks I'Type. C_Concentration,D=Depieden,RM=Redueed Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grams_ 'Locabnn: PL=Pore tuning,Mu Matrix. . Hyd (Applicable l Indicators: (Applicable total l RRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hyditc Soils: • _Histosol(A1) Sandy Redox(S5) _ 2 an Muck(A10) Hwtrc Epipedon(A21 .-__Stripped Matrix(S6) _Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) __Very Shallow Dark Surface TF 12) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Greyed Matrix(12) _,_ Other(Explain in Remarks Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Depleted Matrix iF31 Thick Dark Surtax(Al 2) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surface(17) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) __,Redox Depressions(18) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): -- - --- —.— _ • TYPe_ '.. Depth(inches)-__.._ Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No Remarks • • r HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators:_.. Primary indicators(minimum of one r•No_reA Check al:that aophl_ $INgegerY indre g(2 or more required) Surface Water(At) _Water-Stained Leaves(89)(except _Water-Stained Leaves(89)(MLRA 1,2, ;_High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 48) 4A,and 48) Saturation(AS) __ Salt Crust(Bit) __Drainage Patterns 1810) Water Marks(B1) _Aquatic invertebrates(813) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(62) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) —Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) I _Algal Mat or Crust(84) __.Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Shallow Aouaard(DS) Iron Deposits(851 _Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils(C6) __FAC-Neutral Test(05) Surface Soil Cracks(86) „_-Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI)(LRR A) __Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR A) _..Inundation Vrswie on Aerial Imagery(87) _Other(Explain In Remarks _Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(881 Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No_:_Depth(inches).J_____ Water Table Present? Yes No i Depth(inches) ? Depth inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No Saturation Present Yes No�Dept (inches) Y °�' v mdudes olary tringe)._ _ .-_ , Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well.aerial photos.previous inspectrons) if available: 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 21 • • WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains Valleys,and Coast Region ~=°wxne ' ~ • Landform dullslope terrace.etc). _ __ Local relief(concave convex.mine) Sidee(90 Subregion(LRR)Soil Map Unit Nam - _____ . ~. '^`_. ~. "L.^' /`'" ' ��� mw significantly chsturbeds Are Are Vegetation 'L Soil ____ ,or Hydrology' Vegetation - Soil or Hydrology ��p�=� "Normal~��� °�« Yes �� No .n"�^*"�" =~==°~"n�"* _ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site ma showin sampling,point locations,transects,im rtant features,etc., Thydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes s.:' No Hydric Soil Presents Yes I', No - Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ',"-l Wetland Hydrology Presents Yes --..---� | lb : Remarks -No L ____ '_ •_�_________________________ VEGETATION - a�s. __' ux�xymm ''m=° _ _ ` --'---� 2 ' Total Number of Dominant 4 I Species Across All Strata '; (8) , | �w�e _ ` Total Cover Prevalence Index' � worksheet: 3 mv~�� � --~-- / ^ ,*xmn��, --' --- � � --------��___--'- mo"�"= -_- ,z~ ___ / ------ �------'— mo ��� --- `»~ ---' ~.°wc~~ `"^ m,n~v� ___ "5^ -- 2 — ^--+�---�- __ / Column rm=. (A) --- ,� / z _��_�_�__-_�_� Prevalence 4 -__�- _-___- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation I 4 Morphological Adaptations T(Provide supporting I • _ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) , i 10 _ 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants • _Wimyarzimit_it (Plot size __ / , vegetation ' %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ; Present Yes , Remarks US Army CMS of Engineers Western Mountains valleys and Coast-Version m ■ Marine &b/kmmconnnoota Moyer Wetland Delineation • 22 • _. SOIL Sampling Porn rGiiie Dribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) , Depth Matrix Rectos Features . . — _ (Inches) Color(MNI) % Color(moist) % Tyner Lon' Texture Remarks — ——— — — ——— — — — _ ...1.1p.s.....C=Conotintration.OkObLietion.P.M=Recluoad Matrix.CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains location PL=Pore Lining.M=Matrix. HYdric Soil Indleators: lApplicabie to an LFtlis,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators foe Problematic Hydrie tittiV • _tes(osol(Al) , Sandy Redox ISO) 2 an Muck(A10) _H)stic Epipedon(A2) .._Stripped Matrix 1561 Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) ___.Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) .Very Shallow Dark Surface(7F12) ___Hydrogen Sulfide(AA) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ,_.Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) , .. Depleted Matrix 1F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytie vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) _...Redo.Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If present): I I Type Depth(inches). Remark's. , _LHydric Soil Present? Yes No L - HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators iminanum eterititlaarred,PePI a,l that apply' -.- In.i„to. ...•f •Tritquirest Surface Water(Al) Water-Stained Leaves(199)(except _..„Water-Stained Leaves(BS)(MLRA 1.2, ! -- High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1.2,4A,and 48) 4A,and 48) . Saturation(A3) __Sae Crust(BIl) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) . I _Water Marks(31) ___Aquatic Invertebrates(813) _Dry•Season Water Table(C2) l _Sediment Deposits(82i _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Ct) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) i _Org.(Deposes(83) _Oxidized Rrazospheres along Living Roots(C3) ,Geomorphic.Position(D2) I _Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C41 _Shallow Aquitard(D3) , .. Iron Deposits(BO) __Recent Iron Reduction in ruled Soils(C6) __FAC-Neutral Teat(DO) • • _ Surface Soil Cracks tB6) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR Al ,_, Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRft A) , • , , _Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Other(Explain in Remarks) • ,.,FrostAleave Hummocks(07) . I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88) ! _ Field Observationc . Surface Water Present? Yes No ' Depth(inches) Water Table Present? Yes No_Depth(inches): • , ; Saturation Present', Yes_No_Depth(inches) _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (inciudessapillary fringe) • Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge.monitoring welt aerial photos previous inspections).if available . 1-Remarks • . , ! US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 23 • • WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Vatleys,and Coast Region Project/Site City/County. VpW+canVOwner. r _ Samping Date .vesbgator(s): + State: Sampling Point_�, _- Sector'.Township,Range Landform(hinnlope,terrace,etc I. Local relief(concave.convex,none)' `�^ •. Subregion(LRR): Let. atom(%): Soil Map Unit Name. �� Lam' Datum: Are climatic Unit hydrologic NWI classification. yd ogic Conditions On the site typical for this brae of year?Yes -,_ _-No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation_;Soil_,or Hydrology._._significantly disturbed? Are, Are Vegetation or n .Soil , H 'Normal Circumstances'present? Yes�`_ No Hydrology naturally problematic? (tf needed,explain any answers in Remarks-) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. 1 Hydrophyoc Vegetation Present? Yes No - • Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 1 Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes IRemarks: —�_ i No VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants, Absolute Dominant Indicator ^-.. --------_.._.._� I I p1M (Plot site: ) %Cover - -ARM— Dominance seat nt Sp cies Number of Dominant Species —__-- _- That Are OBI.FACW.or FAG- 4... 2 i (A) 1 3_ — Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across Aa Strata: _ (B) =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Spaces -'-$�� hf4!?.->iL@A1� (Plot size: That Are 081.FACW,or FAC: (NB) Prevalence index woksheet;`--" --"- 2- .�Total 3`C Over of, Muldoly bv- /. 081 species x t= S. S. FACW species x2= --" FAC species - x3= Herb Stratum (Plot size =Total Cover FACU species x 4 1. ) T UPI species x 5= 2. Column Totals: (A) ? (8) 3 Prevalence Index=&A= 4 Hyklrophytic Vegetation Indcatore; 5 — t-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8 _- m_2-Dominance Tests>50 ? t } 3•Prevalence Index is 53 0' &. ..---4-dam logical Adaptations'(Provide supporting•a. { Remarks or on a separate sheet) 70, -- -_ _S-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants` 11 --Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) =Totat Cover be presets.unless disturbed or problematic. • z Hydrophytet • Vegetation :b Bare Ground in Nero Stratum =Total Cover Present? Yes No__ ■ Remarks: - __._ - ..----_ ._ ...----- US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys_and Coast-Version 2.0 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 24 • • Appendix B.Jefferson County Soil Survey Jefferson County Soil Survey The soil survey of Jefferson County indicates eight onsite soil types, (USDA, 1975): Alderwood Series The Alderwood series consists of moderately well drained soils that have a very slowly permeable • cemented layer at a depth of 20 to 40 inches. Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. These soils formed in glacial till under a forest of mixed coniferous and broadleaved vegetation. Annual precipitation ranges from 25 to 50 inches. The average annual air temperature is about 49°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from 160 to 260 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 220 to 320 days. These soils are associated mainly with Beausite, Casey, Clallam, Dick, Everett, Hoypus, Indianola, Sinclair, and Whidbey soils. In a representative profile a thin layer of organic litter covers the surface. The top 1 inch of the soil is very dark grayish-brown gravelly fine sandy loam. Below this,to a depth of 12 inches, is dark yellowish-brown gravelly sandy loam. Beneath this layer, and continuing to a depth of 30 inches, is gravelly sandy loam that is brown in the upper part and dark grayish brown and prominently mottled in the lower part. The next layer is a dark grayish-brown cemented layer that formed in very compact glacial till. Rounded pebbles, cobblestones, and stones are on the surface and throughout the profile. Alderwood soils are used mainly for tree production and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Less than 30 percent of the acreage is used for growing pasture plants, hay plants, and diversified farm crops. • Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes (A1C).-This nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial terraces. In most places the slope is 5 to 10 percent. Representative profile 100 yards west of house, southwest side of Beausite Lake; SE1/4E1/4SE1/4 sec. 28, T. 29 N., R. 1 W.: 01-1 1/2 inches to 1/2 inch,needles,leaves,bark,and fragments of wood. 02-1/2 inch to 0,black(5YR 2/1)partly decayed leaves,needles,bark,and fragments of wood;medium acid; abrupt, Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 25 0 • wavy boundary. (1/2 to 1 1/2 inches thick) A2-0 to 1 inch,very dark grayish-brown (10YR 3/2)gravelly fine sandy loam, pale brown(l OYR 6/3)d fine,granular structure;soft,very friable,nonsticky and nonplastic; many fine and medium roots; 25 percent pebbles;ry medium acid; clear,smooth boundary.(1/2 to 1 1/2 inches thick) B2l ircn-1 to 6 inches,dark yellowish-brown(10YR 4/4)gravelly sandy loam,pale brown(10YR 6/3)dry;structure; slightly hard,friable,slightly sticky ( ) ;c weak,fine, gl► y ky and slightly plastic;many fine and medium roots;common hard iron-manganese concretions;40 percent gravel;medium acid;gradual,wavy boundary. (4 to 6 inches thick) B22ircn-6 to 12 inches,dark yellowish-brown (10YR 4/4)gravelly sandy loam,pale brown 10YR 6/3)dry;weak subangular blocky structure; slightly hard, friable,slightly sticky and slightly plastic;many fine and medium oots;,fine, common hard iron-manganese concretions; 40 percent pebbles; slightly acid;clear,wavy boundary. (5 to 7 inches thick) • B3-12 to 21 inches, brown(10YR.4/3)gravelly sandy loam,pale brown 10YR 6/3)dry;slightly hard,friable,slightly sticky, ( ) ry;weak, fine,subangular blocky g y ky, slightly plastic;many fine and medium roots;45 percent gravel; slightly acid; clear,smooth boundary. (6 to 12 inches thick) C1-21 to 30 inches,dark grayish-brown (10YR 4/2)gravelly sandy loam, light gray(10YR 7/2)dry;yellowish-red(5YR 4/6)mottles;massive; hard,firm,slightly sticky, y( c rY�many and medium 45 percent,gravel;medium acid;gradual,wavy boundary. (4 to 16 inches thick) plastic; few fine and medium C2sim-30 to 48 inches,dark grayish-brown(10YR 4/2)weakly cemented gravelly sandy loam, light gray(10YR 7/2)dry; many coarse,prominent,yellowish-red(5YR 4/6)mottles; massive; extremely hard, extremely firm; no roots;slightly acid.(10 to 18 inches thick) C3-48 inches,very compact gravelly sandy loam glacial till. (Many feet thick) The depth to the cemented layer ranges from 20 to 40 inches.The A2 and B2ircn horizons range from very dark grayish brown to dark yellowish brown. Their content of coarse fragments ranges from 20 to 50 percent and averages more than 35 percent. In places the upper part of the Cl horizon is compact gravelly loamy sand. Few to many hard iron-manganese concretions are in the A2,B2ircn,and B22ircn horizons. Small areas of sandy, very gravelly, or cobbly soils are included with this soil in mapping. This soil is moderately well drained. Permeability above the cemented layer is moderately rapid. Roots penetrate to the cemented layer and flatten out on top of it. A perched water table is above the • cemented layer during the winter months. This soil holds 2 to 4 inches of water available for plants. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is used for permanent pasture of mixed grasses and legumes. Both hay and silage are commonly produced. Small grains, vegetables, berries, and fruit trees are also grown. Capability unit IVe-1; woodland group 3d2. Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 26 • • Cassolary Series The Cassolary series consists of well-drained soils on upland terraces. Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. Elevation ranges from 50 to 500 feet. These soils formed in reworked glacial and marine sediments. Native vegetation is mainly Douglas- fir, western redcedar, western hemlock, red alder, bigleaf maple, rhododendron, salal, huckleberry, and swordfern. Annual precipitation ranges from 17 to 25 inches. The average annual air temperature is 50°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from about 160 to 260 days, and the above 28°F growing • season ranges from about 220 to 320 days. Cassolary soils are associated mainly with Agnew, Alderwood, Clallam, Dick, Everett, Indianola, Kitsap, and Tukey soils. In a representative profile in a wooded area, a thin layer of organic litter covers the surface. The upper 23 inches of the soil is sandy loam. To a depth of 3 inches it is dark gray, between depths of 3 and 15 inches it is dark brown, and between depths of 15 and 23 inches it is dark grayish brown. Below this is grayish-brown silt loam that extends to a depth of 27 inches. Beneath this, and extending to a depth of 33 inches, is grayish-brown silty clay loam. The next layer is light olive-brown fine sandy- loam that extends to a depth of 49 inches. It is underlain to a depth of 60 inches by very dark grayish-brown medium sand. Most of the acreage of Cassolary soils is wooded. The soils are used mainly for production of trees and for small ranches and rural homesites. Belfast Series The Belfast series consists of well-drained soils on flood plains. Slopes range from 1 to 2 percent. Elevation ranges from 30 to about 300 feet. These soils formed in alluvium under a forest consisting mostly of Douglas-fir, western redcedar, Sitka spruce, red alder, maple, willow, cottonwood, • salmonberry, and swordfern. Annual precipitation ranges from 30 to 70 inches. The average annual air temperature is about 50°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from 160 to 200 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 210 to 250 days. These soils are associated mainly with Lummi and Swantown soils. Belfast silty clay loam,wet variant (Bm).-This nearly level soil is on flood plains. The upper 20 inches of the soil is silty clay loam and sandy clay loam. Below this, to a depth of 60 inches, is dominantly dark-gray or olive-gray, neutral or slightly acid, stratified fine sandy loam, silt loam, and Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 27 w • clay loam. This soil is poorly drained. Permeability is moderately slow. The soil holds 10 to 12 inches of water available for plants. A seasonal water table is at a depth of 1/2 to 1 foot. Most of the acreage of this soil is used for pasture. Capability unit IIIw-1; woodland group 4w2. In a representative profile in a typical cultivated area, the upper 15 inches is silt loam that is very dark grayish brown in the upper part and dark grayish brown in the lower part. Below this are dark grayish- brown stratified layers ranging in texture from fine sandy loam to silt loam. All soil layers are slightly acid except the surface layer, which is medium acid. Belfast soils are used for rowin g g pasture plants, hay, home garden crops, bulbs, rhododendrons, and azaleas and for summer homesites. Cassolary sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes (CfC). This nearly level to rolling soil is on upland terraces. In most places slopes range from 5 to 10 percent. Representative profile 350 feet east of west quarter corner f the NW1/4SW1/4SW1/4 sec. 33, T. 30 N., R. 1 W.: 01-3 inches to 1 inch,needles, leaves,bark,and fragments of wood.02-1 inch to 0, dark reddish-brown (5YR 2,/2)partly decayed needles, leaves,bark,and fragments of wood; strongly acid;abrupt, wavy boundary. (1/2 to l 1/2 inches thick) A2--0 to 3 inches,dark-gray(10YR 4/1)sandy loam, light gray(10YR 7/1)dry;massive; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic; many fine,medium,and coarse roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. (2 to 4 inches thick) B21 it-3 to 15 inches,dark-brown (10YR 4/3)sandy loam,pale brown(10YR 6/3)dry; few,faint dark-brown (7.5YR 4/4) mottles;weak,fine and medium,subangular blocky structure; soft,very friable,nonstic medium,and coarse roots; 10 percent very hard,dark reddish-brown (5YR 3/4)iron concretions; medium acidngradual, wavy boundary. (10 to 18 inches thick) B22-15 to 23 inches,dark grayish-brown (10YR 4/2)sandy loam, light brownish gray(10YR 6/2)dry; few,medium and coarse,distinct dark-brown(7.5YR 4/4)mottles; weak,medium and coarse,subangular blocky structure; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic;common fine, medium,and coarse roots; 8 percent very hard,dark reddish-brown(5YR 3/4)iron concretions: medium acid; abrupt,smooth boundary.(6 to 10 inches thick) IICI-23 to 27 inches,grayish-brown(10YR 5/2)silt loam, light gray(10YR 7/2)dry; few, medium, faint dark yellowish- brown(10YR 4/4)mottles,massive; hard, firm,slightly sticky,plastic; few fine and medium roots; medium acid; clear, Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 28 • smooth boundary.(3 to 6 inches thick) 11C2-27 to 38 inches,grayish-brown(2.5Y 5/2)silty clay loam, light gray(2.5Y 7,2)dry;common,medium,distinct dark yellowish-brown(10YR 4/4)mottles;massive;hard,firm,sticky,plastic;few fine and medium roots; slightly acid;clear, smooth boundary. (10 to 16 inches thick) 111C3-38 to 49 inches,light olive-brown(2.5Y 5/4)fine sandy loam, light yellowish brown(2.5Y 6/4)dry ;few,medium and coarse,faint yellowish-brown(10YR 5/4)mottles;massive; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic;slightly acid; clear,wavy boundary. (8 to 12 inches thick) IVC4-49 to 60 inches,very dark grayish-brown(2.5Y 3/2)and grayish-brown(2.5Y 5/2)medium sand;dark grayish brown(2.5Y 4/2)and light brownish gray(2.5Y 6/2)dry;few,coarse,faint yellowish-brown(10YR 5/4)mottles;single • grained; loose,nonsticky,nonplastic;few pebbles; neutral. The depth to sand or loamy sand exceeds 40 inches.The A2 horizons range from fine sandy loam to sandy loam.The B2lir horizon is dark brown or brown fine sandy loam.or sandy loam.The B22 horizon is dark grayish brown or brown fine sandy loam or sandy loam. The C horizons are interstratified silty clay loam,silt loam,fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loamy sand,and sand. Everett Series The Everett series consists of somewhat excessively drained, gravelly soils. They formed in glacial outwash on terraces with steep escarpments. Slopes range from 0 to 50 percent. Elevation ranges from slightly above sea level to about 500 feet.Native vegetation consists mainly of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western redcedar, rhododendron, madrone, salal, huckleberry, Oregon grape, and bracken. Annual precipitation ranges from 26 to 35° inches. The average annual air temperature is about 50 F. The above 32°F growing season ranges from about 200 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from about 280 to 300 days. These soils are associated mainly with Alderwood, Carlsborg, Cassolary, Hoypus, Indianola, Kitsap, and Sinclair soils. In a representative profile 2 to 3 inches of forest litter and decomposing organic matter cover the surface. The upper 6 inches of the soil is dark-brown gravelly sandy loam. Below this,to a depth of 16 inches, is dark-brown gravelly sandy loam. Next,to a depth of 26 inches, is light olive-brown gravelly • loamy sand. Beneath this, and extending to a depth of 48 inches, is dark grayish-brown very gravelly medium and coarse sand. Below this, to a depth of 60 inches, is grayish-brown fine and medium sand. Everett soils are used mainly for production of trees. Everett gravelly sandy loam,0 to 15 percent slopes (EvC).- This nearly level to rolling soil is on glacial outwash terraces. In most places slopes range from 4 to 10 percent. Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 29 S • Representative profile in the South Point area, S W 1/4NW 1/4NW 1/4 sec. 16, T. 27 N., R. 1 E.: 01-2 1/2 inches to 1 inch,needles,leaves,twigs,bark,moss,and fragments of wood. 02-1 inch to 0,dark reddish-brown (5YR 2/2),decomposing organic litter; medium acid;abrupt, smooth boundary. A2-0 to 1 inch,dark-gray(10YR 4/1)gravelly fine sandy loamy, light gray(10YR 63)dry;weak,fine and medium, granular structure; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic; many fine roots;35 percent rounded, fine and medium pebbles;medium acid; clear,wavy boundary.(1/2 to 1 inch thick) B2lir-1 to 6 inches,dark-brown (10YR 3/3)gravelly sandy loam,brown(10YR 5/3)dry;weak,fine,granular and weak, fine,subangular blocky structure; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic; many fine, medium,and coarse roots;40 percent rounded, fine and medium pebbles and few fine, shot-like pebbles coated with iron oxide;medium acid;gradual, • wavy boundary.(4 to 7 inches thick) B22ir-6 to 16 inches,dark-brown(10YR 4/3)gravelly sandy loam,pale brown(10YR 6,/3)dry;massive; soft,very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic;common fine and medium roots;45 percent rounded,fine and medium pebbles; medium acid;gradual,wavy boundary.(9 to 14 inches thick) 11B3-16 to 26 inches, light olive-brown (2.5Y 5/4)gravelly loamy sand, light yellowish brown(2.5Y 6/4)dry; single grained; loose,nonsticky,nonplastic; few fine roots; 30 percent rounded,plants. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is used mainly for production of trees, wildlife habitat, and recreation areas. Approximately 20 percent of the acreage of this soil has been cleared and is used for growing permanent (fig. 2) pasture, hay, and diversified garden crops. Capability unit VIe-1; woodland group 3f2. Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes (EvD).-This hilly soil is on glacial outwash moraine terraces where they converge with the steep ravines and drainageways. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is used mainly for production of trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit VIe-1; woodland group 3f2. • San Juan Series The San Juan series consists of somewhat excessively drained gravelly soils. Slopes range from 0 to 8 percent. Elevation ranges from slightly above sea level to about 300 feet. These soils formed in glacial outs;-ash under native vegetation consisting mostly of annual perennial grasses, Oregon grape, salal, wild blackberry, bracken fern, and a scattering of Douglas-fir and white oak. Annual precipitation is 18 to 28 inches. The average annual air temperature is about 50°F. The above 32°F growing season ranges Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 30 • from about 230 to 270 days, and the above 28°F growing season ranges from 290 to 320 days. These soils are associated with Clallam, Dick, Everett, Townsend, and Whidbey soils. In a representative profile the upper 17 inches of the soil is black gravelly sandy loam. Below this, to a depth of 22 inches, is dark reddish-brown gravelly loamy coarse sand. Beneath this, and extending to a depth of 60 inches, is dark-brown, grayish-brown, and very dark grayish-brown gravelly coarse sand. Glacial cobbles are present throughout the soil, particularly below a depth of 17 inches. San Juan soils are used mostly for urban and rural home- sites. San Juan gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes • (SaB).-This nearly level to gently undulating soil is in areas of glacial drift and on outwash plains. Most slopes range from 3 to 6 percent. Representative profile in Port Townsend, 0.2 mile north of San Juan grocery store on San Juan Avenue in NE1/4NE1/4 sec. 3, T. 30 N., R. 1 W., 10 feet west of road: A11-0 to 4 inches,black(5YR 2/1)gravelly sandy loam,very dark brown(10YR 2/2)dry;moderate,medium,granular structure;soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic;many fine roots;20 percent fine and coarse gravel;medium acid: gradual,wavy boundary. (3 to 5 inches thick) Al2-4 to 17 inches,black(5YR 2/1)gravelly sandy loam,very dark brown(10YR 2/2)dry;moderate,medium and coarse,granular structure; soft,very friable,nonsticky,nonplastic;many fine roots;22 percent fine and coarse gravel; medium acid; clear,wavy boundary.(8 to 14 inches thick) AC-17 to 22 inches,dark reddish-brown(5YR 3/2)gravelly loamy coarse sand,dark brown(7.5YR 4/2)dry ;single grained;loose,nonsticky,nonplastic;common fine roots;35 percent mixed gravel and a few cobbles;slightly acid; gradual,wavy boundary. (4 to 6 inches thick) C1-22 to 28 inches,dark-brown and grayish-brown(7.5YR and 2.5Y hues)gravelly coarse sand;single grained;loose, nonsticky,nonplastic;few fine roots;40 percent mixed gravel and a few cobbles; slightly acid;gradual,wavy boundary. (5 to 7 inches thick) • C2-28 to 60 inches,very dark grayish-brown(2.5Y 3/2)gravelly coarse sand,grayish brown(2.5Y 5/2)dry; single grained; loose,nonsticky,nonplastic; 15 percent fine gravel;neutral. The A horizons range from black to very dark brown.The AC horizon is dark reddish-brown to dark-brown coarse sandy loam and coarse loamy sand. This horizon is 15 to 45 percent gravel and cobbles.The Cl horizon is dark-brown,brown, or dark grayishbrown coarse sand and loamy coarse sand.It is 15 to 45 percent gravel and cobbles.The C2 horizon is very dark grayish-brown to olive-brown coarse sand or medium sand and is 10 to 20 percent fine gravel. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of well-drained soils. Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 31 • • This soil is somewhat excessively drained. Permeability is rapid. Roots penetrate to a depth of more than 60 inches. This soil holds 3 to 4 inches of water available for plants. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Most of the acreage of this soil is in urban areas or in rural ranch areas where it is used extensively for growing a variety of flowers, bulbs, home garden fruits, berries, and vegetables. Small acreages are also planted to grasses and legumes used for hay and pasture. Capability unit VIs-1; woodland group 5f2 Semiahmoo Series The Semiahmoo series consists of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in well decomposed • and disin- tegrated plant remains and overlying mineral soil material at a depth of 52 to 60 inches or more. These soils are in glacial basins or old displaced stream and river channel ponded areas. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. Elevation ranges from near sea level to about 1,000 feet. Annual precipitation is 20 to 60 inches. The average annual air temperature is 49 to 50° F. The above 32° F growing season ranges from 160 to 260 days, and the above 28° F growing season ranges from 215 to 320 days. These soils are associated mainly with McMurray and Mukilteo soils. In a representative profile the upper 12 inches of the soil is black muck containing many fine roots and a few decomposing fragments of wood. Below this, to a depth of 16 inches, is dark reddish-brown muck that is about 25 percent identifiable sedge fibers (before rubbing) and contains many fine roots. Beneath this, and extending to a depth of 25 inches, is brown mucky peat that darkens to dark reddish- brown when exposed to air. The next layer, to a depth of 54 inches, is brown mucky peat that darkens rapidly to dark reddish brown when exposed to air. Below this is a 1-inch layer of light-gray very fine sand and silt volcanic ash. Below this, to a depth of 55 inches, is dark reddish-brown muck. The organic layers are neutral to medium acid. About 70 to 80 percent of the acreage of Semiahmoo soils is under cultivation Most of the rest is in pasture. Semiahmoo muck, moderately shallow variant (Sh).-This soil has a surface layer of black muck 10 • to 15 inches thick, and in most places two to four layers of muck and mucky peat are above the mineral soil material. A layer of diatomaceous earth, 2 to 5 inches thick is generally 10 to 18 inches below the surface. In many places the mucky peat layer near the bottom is 25 to 40 percent silt and clay. The depth to the underlying mineral soil material, which includes loamy sand, sandy loam, sandy clay loam, sandy clay, and clay, ranges from 24 to 48 inches. This soil is used mainly for growing grasses and legumes for livestock and for garden truck and field Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 32 • • crops. Cap- ability unit IIw-2; not assigned to a woodland group. Semiahmoo muck, shallow variant (Sm).-In this soil the organic material is 15 to 24 inches thick over mineral soil material which includes loamy sand, sandy loam, sandy clay loam, sandy clay, and clay. The soil is used mainly for growing grasses, legumes, and truck and field crops. Capability unit IIw-2; not assigned to a woodland group. Tisch Series • The Tisch series consists of poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium, volcanic ash, and diatomaceous earth. These soils are in upland basins. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. Elevation ranges from 50 to 800 feet. Native vegetation consists mostly of grasses, sedges, willow, alder, western hemlock, and western redcedar. Annual precipitation ranges from 20 to 60 inches. The average annual air temperature is about 50° F. The above 32° F growing season ranges from 220 to 260 days, and the above 28° F growing season ranges from 250 to 290 days. These soils are associated with Belfast, McMurray, Mukilteo, Semiahmoo, and Snohomish soils. In a representative profile the upper 8 inches of the soil is black silt loam. Below this, to a depth of 14 inches, is very dark grayish-brown silt loam. The underlying material consists of three layers: a white layer, between depths of 14 and 20 inches, of silty volcanic ash and diatomaceous earth; a grayish- brown layer, between depths of 20 and 31 inches, of silty volcanic ash and diatomaceous earth; and an olive-gray layer, between depths of 31 and 54 inches, of stratified loamy sand and silty clay loam. The profile is slightly acid to neutral. Tisch soils are used mainly for pasture, wildlife habitat, and recreation areas. About 60 percent of the acreage is cultivated. Tisch silt loam (Th).-This nearly level soil is on upland basins, generally in close association with moderately shallow muck and peat soils. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. • Representative profile 0.7 mile north of Chimacum on the Bailey farm in SE1/4NW1/4 sec. 11, T. 29 N., R. 1 directly west of Bailey house and 200 feet west of toe of slope: Ap-0 to 8 inches,black(5YR 2/1)silt loam,dark reddish brown(5YR 3/2)dry;moderate,medium,granular and weak, thick,platy structure; slightly hard,friable,slightly sticky,slightly plastic;many fine,fibrous roots; slightly acid; clear, wavy boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick) Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 33 • • A3-8 to 14 inches,very dark grayish-brown(1 OYR 3/2)silt loam, grayish brown(10YR5/2)dry; few,fine,distinct dark-brown(7.5YR 4/4)mottles; weak,thick,platy and moderate, medium,prismatic structure;slightly hard,friable, slightly sticky, plastic;few fine,fibrous roots; slightly acid;clear,wavy boundary. (5 to 10 inches thick) C1-14 to 20 inches,white(2.5Y 8/2)silt,white(N 8/0)dry;thick,platy structure;slightly hard,firm; few fine, fibrous roots;neutral;clear, wavy boundary.(5 to 10 inches thick) C2-20 to 31 inches,grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2)silt, light gray(2.5Y 7/2)dry;thick,platy structure; slightly hard,firm; few roots:organic stains in pores; few grains of medium sand,some of which are mica flakes;neutral; abrupt, smooth boundary.(2 to 12 inches thick) C3-31 to 60 inches,olive-gray(5Y 5/2),stratified loamy sand and silty clay loam, light gray(5Y 7/2)dry; few, fine, • distinct dark yellowish-brown(10YR 4/4)mottles; massive;slightly hard,firm,sticky,slightly plastic;neutral. The organic-matter content of the Ap horizon ranges from 15 to 20 percent.The A3 horizon ranges from very dark gray to very dark grayish brown and is more than 5 percent organic matter.The Cl and C2 horizons are white,pale yellow, light yellowish brown,grayish brown,and light olive brown. The C3 horizon is olive gray, gray,and dark gray. It is stratified. Thin layers of muck and peat are present in places below a depth of 24 inches. This soil is poorly drained. Permeability is moderately slow. Roots penetrate to a depth of more than 60 inches. This soil holds about 9 to 11 inches of water available for plants. Runoff is ponded to very slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight or nonexistent. A seasonal water table is at a depth of 1/2 to 1 1/2 feet. Most of the acreage of this soil has been cleared and is used for growing pasture or home garden berries and vegetables. About 25 percent of the acreage is in trees, mostly alder and willow, and is used for wildlife habitat and recreation areas. Capability unit IIIw-1; not assigned to a woodland group. • Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 34 • • Appendix C. Wetland Rating Forms Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland(or ID#): Moyer Wetland parcel#901143007 Date of site visit: 3/5/2015 Rated by M.Amos&S. Nichol Trained by Ecology?X Yes No Date of training 9/2014 HGM Class used for rating Depressional Wetland has multiple HGM classes?X Y_N • NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested(figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 2 (based on functions X or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I-Total score=23-27 Score for each X Category II-Total score =20-22 function based on three Category III-Total score =16 19 ratings Category IV-Total score=9-15 (order of ratings is important) FUNCTION Improving T Hydrologic Habitat im p Water Quality I 9=H,H,H Circle the appropriate ratings 8=H,H,M Site Potential H L H M H M ® 7-H H L Landscape Potential 0 M L ® M L H M ® 7=H,M,M Value ® M 1 ® M L J M L TOTAL 6=H,M,L —-- 6=M,M,M Score Based on 5 • Ratings 8 7 5 2 =H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3=L,L,L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value • Bog Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 1 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 35 • • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes - - __- _ D 1.3,H 1.1,H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4,H 1.2 Location of outlet(con be added to mop of hydroperiods) D 1.1,D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) D 2.2,D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3,D 5.3 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat •Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) D 3.1,D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure Cowardin plant classes H 11,H 1.4 Hydroperiods ' N1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants R 1.2,R 4.2 Width of unit vs.width of stream(can be added to another figure) _ R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2,R 2.3,R 5.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMOIs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) R 3.2,R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1,H 1.1,H 1.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(con be added to another figure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) L 3.1,L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDIs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes H 1.1,H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants s 1.3 Plant cover of dense,rigid trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants 5 4.1 • (can be added to figure above) Boundary of 150 ft buffer(can be added to another figure) S 2.1,S 5.1 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) S 3.1,S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 2 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 36 • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7,the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated,you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case,identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply,and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? • ® -go to 2 YES-the wetland class is Tidal Fringe-go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)? NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe lfyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored.This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source(>90%)of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. 9-go to 3 YES-The wetland class is Flats ur wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland,use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water(without any plants on the surface at any time of the year)at least 20 ac (8 ha)in size; ��_At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m). ENO -go to 4 YES-The wetland class is Lake Fringe(Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps.It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. ® go to 5 YES-The wetland class is Slope NOTE:Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually<3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 0 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? X The unit is in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that . stream or river, X The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 3 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 37 • e 1 Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland go to 6 YES-The wetland class is Riverine CI TE:The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds,or is saturated to the surface,at some time during the year? This means that any outlet,if present is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO-go to 7 'ES� The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. • NO-go to 8 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example,seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small • stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT(make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10%of the unit;classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90%of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit HGM class to being rated use in rating Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional Slope+Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional+Riverine along stream Depressional within boundary of depression Depressional+Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine+Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE If you are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary,classify the wetland as Depressional for the • rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 4 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 38 0 • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0.Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1.Characteristics of surface water ou flows from the wetland; Wetland is a depression or flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key)with no surface water leaving it(no outlet). points=3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points=2 Wetland has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet that is permanently flowing points=1 Wetland is a flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key),whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points=1 2 0 1.2.The soil 2 in below the surface(or duff layer)is true clay or true organic(use NRCS definitions).Yes=4 No=0 0 • D 1.3.Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants(Emergent,Scrub-shrub,and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,plants>95%of area points=5 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,plants>N of area points=3 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed plants>'/,a of area points=1 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed plants<'/,s of area points=0 5 D 1.4.Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months.See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is>N total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>'''Atotal area of wetland (See site map) points=2 Area seasonally ponded is<N total area of wetland points=0 2 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 9 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12-16=H y 6-11=M _0-5=I. Record the rating on the first page D 2.0.Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1.Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes=1 No=0 1 0 2.2.1s>10%of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 2.3.Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 2.4.Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions 0 2.1-0 2.3? Source Yes=1 No=0 Total for 0 2 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: X 3 or 4=H _1 or 2=M ®0=L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0.Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1.Does the wetland discharge directly(i.e.,within 1 mi)to a stream,river,lake,or marine water that is on the 303(d)list? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 3.2.Is the wetland in a basin or sub-basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d)list? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 3.3.Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality(answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes=2 No=0 2 • Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: X 2-4=H _1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 5 Rating Form-Effective lanuary 1,2015 Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 39 • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions-Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0.Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1.Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints=2 Wetland is a flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key),whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points=1 Wetland has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet that is permanently flowing points=0 0 D 4.2.Depth of storage during wet periods:Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet.For wetlands with no outlet,measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry,the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 • Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 The wetland is a"headwater"wetland points=3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points=1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft(6 in) points=0 0 0 4.3.Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed:Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points=5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points=3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points=5 3 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16=H __6-11=M X 0-5=L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0.Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1.Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes=1 No=0 D 5.2.Is >10%of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 5.3.Is more than 25%of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses(residential at >1 residence/ac,urban,commercial,agriculture,etc.)? Yes=1 No=0 1 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: A 3=H _1 or 2=M 0=L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0.Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1.The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems.Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points.Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down-gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources(e.g.,houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs In a sub-basin that is immediately down-gradient of unit. points=2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub-basin farther down-gradient. points=1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub-basin. points=1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood.Explain why points=0 • There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points=0 2 D 6.2.Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O 2 Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above 4 Rating of Value If score is: X2-4=H 1=M 0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 6 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 40 • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0.Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1.Structure of plant community:Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class.Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland.Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of or or more than 10%of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac.Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more:points=4 X Emergent 3 structures:points=2 _Scrub-shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) 2 structures:points=1 Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) 1 structure:points=0 if the unit has a Forested class,check if 0 • The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous,moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2.Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or Si ac to count(see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present:points=3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present:points=2 X Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present:points=1 :Saturated only 1 type present:points=0 X Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland (See site map) 2 points 3 H 1.3.Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft'. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian mitfoil,reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife,Canadian thistle If you counted:>19 species points=2 5-19 species points=1 0 <S species points=0 H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,moderate,low,or none.If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water,the rating is always high. CD 0 None=0 points Law=1 point Moderate=2 points • All three diagrams in this row 41110'' 1 are NIGH=3points • Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 13 Rating Form-Effective January 1.2015 Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 41 • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland H 1.5.Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags(dbh>4 in)within the wetland • _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2 m)and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft(1 m) over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the wetland,for at least 33 ft(10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) XAt least h ac of thin-stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in every stratum of plants(see H 1.1 for list of strata) • Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is: 15-18=H 7-14=M X 0-6=L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0.Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1.Accessible habitat(include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: %undisturbed habitat 0 +[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/21 3.4= 1 7% If total accessible habitat is: > Is(33.3%)of 1 km Polygon points=3 20-33%of 1 km Polygon points=2 0 10-19%of 1 km Polygon points=1 <10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.2.Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: %undisturbed habitat 20+[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/21 0 = 20 % Undisturbed habitat>50%of Polygon • points=3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and in 1-3 patches points=2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and>3 patches points=1 0 Undisturbed habitat<10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.3.Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon:If >50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points=(-2) <50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points=0 -2 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6=H 1-3=M X<1=L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0.Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1.Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws,regulations,or policies?Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points=2 -x It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m(see next page) It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species(any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species • .-x It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan,in a Shoreline Master Plan,or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats(listed on next page)within 100 m points=1 Site does not meet an of the criteria above points=0 3 Rating of Value If score is: X 2=H 1=M 0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 14 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys&Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 42 r ■ • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW(see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.2008. Priority Habitat and Species List.Olympia,Washington. 177 pp.http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw001650df or access the list from here: http://wdfw.wa,gov/conservatiort/phs/list/) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft(100 m)of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac(0.4 ha). • —XBiodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests:Old-growth west of Cascade crest-Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)>32 in(81 cm)dbh or>200 years of age.)Mature forests-Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in(53 cm)dbh;crown cover may be less than 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158-see web link above). X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and — terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161-see web link above). X instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide — functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore.Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report- see web link on previous page). — Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft(7.6 m)high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5-6.5 ft(0.15-2.0 m),composed of basalt,andesite, • and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>20 in(51 cm)in western Washington and are>6.5 ft(2 m)in height Priority logs are>12 in(30 cm)in diameter at the largest end,and>20 ft (6 m)long. Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 15 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 43 • • Wetland name or number Moyer Wetland N/A CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland.Circle the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0.Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? —The dominant water regime is tidal, —Vegetated,and —With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes-Go to SC 1.1 No=Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational,Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes=Category I No-Go to SC 1.2 Cat.l • SC 1.2.Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina,see page 25) Cat.I —At least 3 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least two of the following features:tidal channels,depressions with open water,or Cat.II contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes=Category I No=Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1.Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes-Go to SC 2.2 No-Go to SC 2.3 Cat.I SC 2.2.Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes=Category I SC 2.3.Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? No=Not a WHCV http://www1.do r.wa.gov/nh p/refdesk/datasea rch/wnh pwetla nds.pdf Yes-Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No =Not a WHCV SC 2.4.Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Yes=Category I No=Not a WHCV SC 3.0.Bogs Does the wetland(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs?Use the key below.if you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. SC 3.1.Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons,either peats or mucks,that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No-Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2.Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks,that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No=Is not a bog SC 3.3.Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes=Is a Category I bog No-Go to SC 3.4 NOTE:If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory,you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep.If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present,the wetland is a bog. Cat.I SC 3.4.Is an area with peats or mucks forested(>30%cover)with Sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western red cedar, western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Engelmann spruce,or western white pine,AND any of the species(or combination of species)listed in Table 4 provide more than 30%of the cover under the canopy? Yes=Is a Category I bog No=is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 16 Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 44 • s . Dean Mc;t, Jefferson County 150`Buffer Around Delineated Wetland 756 C enter Roac Parcel#901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5,2015 `o:" Chimacum, WA 98_._ S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 Surtieyed by Meg Amos,c ', 1 " N �a * A t - C '. 135 I-el .. z ,,,k),....pra,, •-1, . ffir' — s, f g"t' ---% a '-'''' '' Irt(1,1, #al,,.4 4##,;# . g. I \ #' t-44 Legend r t50`buffer mount)se ra Aetand .»:tea _ _ 4• , • Moyer Wetland Delineation 45 Mo Marine Surveys &Assessments Y a • Dean Moyer Site Jefferson County 1-1.2.0 Habitat Functions 756 Center Road Parcel#901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5 2015 Chimacum WA 98325 S14 T29 R1W TAX 74 Surveyed by Meg Amos., Sooae Nichol N • ! 1_ \\i /jug%.. --k ,/gf}�ff' +" °k k YAt 1, ! f eio • r a Vri tom. Legend r ` s 1 km buffer M Creek Forest • K • ^t ff 1 __ 34 Oe 08 Ih%Iffi • Marine Surveys &Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 46 • i Dean Mover Site d, .._.Jefferson County Contributing Basin t,',. `' 756 Center Road Parcel#901143007 Wetland Delineation performed on March 5 2015 Chimacum WA 98325 S14 T29 R1WTAX 74 Surveyed by Meg Amos Soozie Nichol i'' � �, a�s�saslIr " ' •- .mot l 4' ,� ` '4 m� it 14/1/, � 7r i .a✓ w - t 1 �r 1 w . ii ' --,iivf------- it. ."'",'' • „Ali ' , ,,,w .1 Ir a' 0, . „ *,7,-,/,',„,„ %; i ---- , . ....., A Ar iv ',...... ', t 1.:1,1 ,,, - % ' 4 ill 111 it.0-1,, ' ii.1111: ' \ t ‘ '‘.1 k 'VVIIIIIkh. ; i \ ' --\'- ...t.‘ ' ,-:;7:;• 1 gov,. ..;:if 'bk:-fi, i,T.' 's , \ : - imme/ ---- . A . ' ... ,' ,,,:,.., ,E, , „,,„,,,: ..,,,,, ,. _„: ,,, , .,..,.. , .... .. . L ,,, : „. 7i' '11 T.,!'ii _ �1� ic x y Lam.° mil/Al*"� 4�± r {.^`. ��, $ �y wa• , r c=� i , „.. a ,�,_,� Y . Legend ° ?6'II�trlor er Wetland i <�, 4. NHD Flowiine ,# ; ''um . t .4� CanaltDitch ��' r r` } rt t• a� �r — Stream/River ` r,.t =r . . NHD Waterbody "y }i jj '...... . ,/ -;---_, a " ' ' ' ''''', ,),,,,,,--LI:, : Ad Lake/Pond .' s Reseruoa Si' lr x L. c,= 33�aar Marsh ,^ \( ' N.,,,,y .- D1 , i • Moyer Wetland Delineation 47 Mo Marine Surveys &Assessments Y • ECOLOGY Water Quality Assessment for Washington WQ Assessment Horne. ; 2012 Search 3 Identify Results .., Assessment Hydro Boundaries Latitude:48.01315 Longitude:-122.'17545 Datum:NAD83 HORN 5 listings found Ltstina ID Name 'II Parameter IMediufn;Category Waterbody ID!Lower uppef ! ( f Address�itddres `.. ;„1954(CREEK ITem water 5 12 7770480484 I5. 58 7.028.. ,fly 167:1 CHIMaCUMIBaclena .... pEraCUfe �CREEk 15 12277'9480489;5 1 . A �,028 ;Water 6 ( t + 11 ✓ , ! 9 1 LOCO ` a • ei Water Quality Listino Polio Listing ID: 16737 2012 C Medium:Water Category:5 2008 Category:5 Parameter:Bacteria CAS Number: None 2004 Category:5 Waterbody Name:CHIMACUM CREEK On 1998 303(d)List?:Y On 1996 303(d)List?:Y Waterbody Type:Rivers Waterbody Class:RA County:Jefferson Township/Range/Section:29N-1W-14 Collection Date:N/A Grid Cell:None WRIA: 17-Quilcene Snow Grid Cell Latitude:None PSAA:Hood Canal Grid Cell Longitude:None WASWIS: MB88JL LLID: 12277779480489 WASWIS Upper Route: 7 493 LLID U WASWIS Lower Route:5 735 Upper Route:7 028 LLID Lower Route:5.258 Basis: Hallock(2001)Dept of Ecology Ambient Monitoring Station 178100!Chimacum Cr Chimacum)shows a geometric mean of 542 exceeds the criterion and that 67%of the samples exceeds the percentile criterion from 3 samples collected during 1993.Hallock(2001) and that 67%doff e Ambient samplesoexceeds the percent lcriterion from 9 samples collected during geometric 2ric mean of 310 exceeds the criterion Marine Surveys & Assessments Moyer Wetland Delineation 48 • Gary and Sally Baird Wetland Delineation and Analysis Report Parcel # 901 143 007 February 2007 f' f, i Prepared for: Gary and Sally Baird P.O.Box 591 Chimacum, WA 98325 u/ 1 85b 50th Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 360 385-6432 dixiellewellin @yahoo.com Gary and Sally Baird Wetland Delineation and Analysis Report Parcel # 901 143 007 February 2007 Table of Contents Introduction Description of Site Methodology Background Information Wetland Delineation Findings General Wetland Conditions Soils Vegetation Hydrology Wetland Analysis Results Wetland Categorization Buffer Requirements Summary Limitations References Appendices Sheet #1 Location Map and Soil Survey of Jefferson County, State of Washington Sheet #2 Wetland Boundary Map Applied Methodology Wetlands Rating Field Data Form Data Forms, Routine Determination WA State Wetland Delineation Manual Gary and Sally Baird Wetland Delineation and Analysis Iteport Parcel # 901 143 007 i1 February 2007 Introduction Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. has been authorized by Gary Baird to perform a wetland delineation at 756 Center Road,Chimacum,Washington. A Level I Assessment was conducted on February 13,2007 and the delineation was conducted on February 19,2007. The goal of the wetland delineation was to define the wetland edges, analyze wetland categories,and determine associated buffers that would restrict the placement of a single family residence. . Description of Site • Legal Description: Parcel #901 143 007, Section 14 Township 29N Range 1W • Location: 756 Center Road, Chimacum Jefferson County WA • Hydric Soils: Bm and Bk Belfast silt and clay loam Sh and Sm Semiahmoo muck (listed as on Jefferson County Hydric Soil List 1/91) • Non Hydric Soils: CfC Cassolary sandy loam and Th Tisch silt loam • Slopes: 0 to 15 percent A map of the site location and mapped soils is included in the Appendix (Sheet#1). The Baird property is a 50 acre parcel approximately 1 mile south of SR19 on Center Road. The majority of the acreage is in pasture within the low-lying areas of Chimacum Valley. The pasture is actively grazed by horses. A small portion of the site to the east and along Center Road is sparsely wooded and is upslope from the valley. This is the proposed area for the home site and the location where a well and septic system have recently been installed. The parcel is bordered by farmland to the north and south and Chimacum Creek which defines the western boundary. Methodology Fieldwork to determine the actual wetland boundaries was conducted according to the methodology outlined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual (Department of Ecology March 1997). All wetlands within Jefferson County are subject to requirements outlined in the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) dated January 1, 2001. Land use restrictions will apply to all future developments associated with this parcel. A comprehensive description of methodology used to conduct this report is included in the Appendix. Baird Wetland Delineation and Analysis Report Olympic Wetland Resources,Inc. Report File#2007-0213 1 February 2007 Background Information `~`` The following resources were consulted prior to field work for this projegt: • Jefferson County Critical Areas Map(1995) • National Wetland Inventory Map • Aerial Photographs(Soil maps pre-1975 and 1994,2000 and 2005 interne) • Jefferson County Unified Development Code (January 1,2001) • Soil Survey of Jefferson County(U.S. Soil Conservation Service 1975) • Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual • National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9) The wetland associated with this parcel is large and extends off site and throughout Center Valley and is therefore evaluated as an entire system. The Jefferson County Critical Areas Maps indicate that wetland covers the majority of the parcel with only a small portion of upland along Center Road. This mapping corresponds with the National Wetlands Inventory Maps which classifies the wetland as PEMCD (Palustrine,Emergent, Seasonally flooded, well drained). Wetland Delineation Findings General Wetland Conditions The wetland is defined by topography, soils and hydrology. The entire site is within actively grazed pasture and there was very minimal vegetation evaluate during this delineation. The edge was determined when hydrology and wetland soils were encountered. The upland areas were defined by a slight rise in elevation from the valley floor and the lack of hydrology in the soil test pits at 16 inches down. The wetland's edges were flagged with orange plastic ribbon labeled"Wetland Boundary,"at points 30 to 40 feet apart within the open pasture. Flagging is labeled with alphanumeric codes(Al through A4). The data point locations, wetland edges, and buffers are indicated on the Wetland Boundary Map in the Appendix (Sheet#2). Soils Many bands of soils are listed for this large parcel. Soils along Chimacum Creek are Bm Belfast silt loam Sh Semiahmoo muck. Findings within the wetland soil test pits corresponded closely with the dark brown soil colors and textures described for these hydric soils. Upland soil pits corresponded with the CfC Cassolary sandy loam soil description Soils in Data Point 1 (DP#1)were clearly hydric. A dark,organic soil was found with a low chroma(Munsell 10YR 2/2) with very abundant mottles (10YR 4/6). Soils were saturated at the below the surface and free water was present to within fifteen inches of the surface. This soil was very similar to that described as Semiahmoo muck in the Jefferson County Soil Survey. Baird Wetland Delineation and Analysis Report Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. 2 February 2007 Report File#2007-0213 rx References Buckingham, et al., 1995. Flora of the Olympic Peninsula. Northwest Interpretive Association and the Washington Native Plant Society, Seattle, Wash. Cooke, Sarah Spear, 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Wash. Cowardin, L.M.V. Carter, F.C.Goblet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetland and Deep Water Habitats of the U.S. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Hitchcock and Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1987. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. July 1994 update. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Jefferson County Unified Development Code. January 2001. Leonard, William P., 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Series. MacBeth, Div. of Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., 1992. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Mitsch and Gosselink, 1993. Wetlands. Pojar, Mackinnon, 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Reed, Porter, 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9. 1993 update. Washington State Wetland Department of Ecology, March 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, #96-94. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Pocahontas Press. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County. • Appendices • Y Sheet #1 Location Map and Soil Survey of Jefferson County, State of Washington Sheet #2 Wetland Boundary Map k Applied Methodology Wetlands Rating Field Data Form Data Forms, Routine Determination WA State Wetland Delineation Manual 0 isel lids: Location and Soil Map �'�`As Indicated ,ty Olympic Wetland Resources,Inc 756 Center Road Chimacum WA 98325 ;oars I #1 856 50th Street II February 2007 -. Port Townsend,WA 98368 0 nl: Gary and Sally Baird 'r 360 385-6432 P.O.Box 591 J6#'2007-0213 diziellewellin @yahoo.com Chimacum,WA 98325 ■ Parcel #901 143 007 TOPOI map printed on 05/08/02 from "Puget.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg" 122°42'00" W 122°33'00" W WGS84 122°1 Subject Property ' '''' -9°P3'---1-i- '''' '-' ''' J.. kCi'(1C;I:.'5, ,'.) ,4 z fcR' Vr°A'� F' ', , PARS ,tS 1 CT' ?,„, imps, '.p `S' � ' O -'i O o f -. i ` • `- 1. - i.....4' ` :��s. .. : n 0 • t7•,,•` vs ,. O `,� : .'otyt wn el' re.00 an �.•4 • �.y .; SOT Fi. \ �' / 1- Indi, t' _ a- ?�Isla .. •,t li} \ "1" -,:,,..,--,,---,,i.,',,'.'4,, f' �• - � „z�•.Fk.' .lsti G "fit), 1 �„v� d' ,.,, <, Z n G • .0 1 4°, • iNor a d r-� ,,t r ,,. .. j Z it ,, s , E r - r�..-"7._. ., LdnJ3 y • O 0 1 '-� I®m111ia Free#= •' --- „'- >• m -�- °� grey silk. x . Auai1 �li on d f EVE , d e+`�s :) S Vele ''� '(� :•-.) ).`��' lu "bead ., I sr- +' / '4 , 4:., sac o„ ftl e• I f I Z r '1' t.� Y � " �.y NGlen � • z t j �' '� ti E ^: b t b .ter . �,._ _ =^�`,,Poss�ssytii�� !+.'. N t o pct - --' a 401Iey d 3tans ,,/e ,�. 4: a t o f �B t C,: ' t 'st n R / 'ands ,1 0 3t> L: ro F 1. .�, s r `' Shtfltlrt '' PO T G MyOLE - /// } / _v;,. , t ..•w- ,• . • 0 :ton'!. j' -:i4i. 'i;,: z /1. ..t , . _,, * ,1 8 / �l 4 t •in XO \ ; 1-,,,- ) CO 9, P ig I o mItC$n$ l !• f81 ye ,-- ,x ' •0 id F ,,„ A; i In tr t a,r d o d d1kBr ` d 122°42'00" W 122°331000" W WGS84S122°17'00" W 0 T1*(MN .ti r . ti r, V .ti r , ti r , I .ti r , ti t, 1 25 km 1 10 15 20 4 4r— — 19° 0 5 Printed from TOPO!01999 Wildflower Productions(v.ww.topo.com) 4 _ Bk Belfast silt loam,wet variant Bm Belfast silty clay loam,wet variant y t Cassolary sandy loam,0 to 15 percent slopes 1 i CfC Se Semiahmoo muck a a Sh Semiahmoo muck,moderately shallow variant Sm Semiahmoo muck,shallow variant " ,,.,::4 StB Swantown gravelly sandy loam,0 to 8 percent slopes Tisch silt loam a' r. Th �►_ • ■■■••... .... .0•11•■11■1101 ......7..........................._______,...?,.................._..;........__, 277' 7:3 o c ---"---------------- r._..__--enter Road t t . o - ____J zr) so . • - o_ E 0 * ,t■ I , • ,--- . , ' 0 0 0 -E . o ci . • • 0 p.a. :;:'").4t•H ''''''' _`,...Ai .... ......" — _ - • • . . . . 0 0 . •CI! . ..-,T1' '7=7-'-',2'...#°e-,-- 0 , c 0 ....„ , e4 -0 D 2 --$ ---,, - C) 4t u., 0 Li R -0 U 6 c c ,a) 0 0 - a — 1 o_ 0 - ° a. 0 < 0 c) 1 ^ "a5 -(---) ---) , , .5 1 ,c,1 1 r8 o c (..) .. c ms i c> c ...., -c3 C.) C , 1 c'' 0C _ I Q V 7) — a) Q.. 1 cs •- o 'A' sn C,1 -3. , I t N ct Ct -e- c) co I. ,..„ .-- co , •ct c\ ---- = CL> CI) E 0 co I ti) ro E ,_. w — _ •,71 1 m c..., ,c co ...., 1:k - 75 ICI4 ..5 1 •b 0 ■-:: I 0_ i — , a.) —.-...: 1 .7... U = cc3 ..c. E _ ...-.- CV, C• ". a., oc, ,--, *ci:V c'7 ...x c) 1 v . — ., = = g ._ , ,_ .. . .I_=. , r F. (7) ..4-1 C .-,).-oc) .., ''' ...... ....0 =C.,1 ...--- I Cn - ' "Z 1. C.,) •-- •,.. ,:!:1 S 1.7i 0 =--- b . '0'1.4;:., •,.'",,,,,, 40/04 c-3 ct t di so 4,0t, ..ii ... 4. -... —z irliilf SO Will ge lei — 40 ee\( c(-,C Cr\1113 .0 .0 .. ... ... o. _ _ .... Wetland Rating Field Data Form Background Information: pate:February 13.2007 Name of Rater:Dixie Llewellin Affiliation:Olympic Wetland Resources.Inc. ""l1 Name of Wetland(if ion of):Parcel#901143007 Gary Washington State Deparment of Ecology Government Jurisdiction of Wetland Jefferson County, Ranged W TOWnship:29N Location:Sectlona 4 t Sources of Information: (Check all sources that apply) Aerial Photo: X Soil Survey:X Site Visit:X USGS Topo Map:X NWI Map:X - - DescrlbeJefferson County Critical Areas Map 1994,2000 and 2005 ` ' i When X Here: i When the Field Data Form is Complete Enter Category 28 Points CATEGORY II Circle Answers Q1. High Quality Natural Wetland y la. Human caused disturbances Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology Or the wetland as incicated by any of the following conditions? Consider only changes that may changes that may have taken place in the last 5 decades. The impacts of changes done earlier have propably been stabilized and the wetland ecosystems will be close to reaching some new equilibrium that may represent a high quality wetland. yes:go to Q.2 la.1 Upland watershed>12%impervious Yes:go to Q.2 1a.2 Wetland is ditched and water flow is not obstructed Yes:go to Q.2 la.3 Wetland has been graded,filled,logged IYes.go to Q.2 la.4 Water in wetland is controlled by dikes,weirs,etc. Yes:go to Q.2 la.5 Wetland n is indicators 1a.6 Other indicators of disturbance(listed below)buffer is mowed,wetland drainage is blocked In pan s lb.Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present,cover more that 10%of the wetland and appear to be invading native populations? Yes:go to Q.2 le.Is there evidence of human-caused disturbances which have visibly degraded runoff from roads or parking lots:presence or historic evidence of Yes:go to Q.2 Possible Cat.I waste dumps;oily sheens,the smell of organic chemicals,or livestock use. Briefly describe: Q.2.Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: Does the wetland to all:go to 03) have at least 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches and the wetland is relatively undisturbed:OR Yes:Go to 2b. have a forested class greater that 1 acre;OR Organic Soils Are Disturbed Yes:Go to 2c. have characteristics of an estuarine system;OR Yes:Go to 2d. have eel grass floating or non-floating kelp beds? 2a. Bogs and Fens Yes:Category Are any of the three following conditions met for the area of organic soil? 2a.1 Are Sphagnum mosses a common ground cover(>30%)and the cover of of invasive species(Table 3)less than 10%? II Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils>1/2 acre? Yes es C C to o ategory ry Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils 1/4 to 1/2 acre? No: 2a.2 Is there an area of organic soil which has an emergent class with at least one species from Table 2,and a cover of invasive species<10%. Yes:Category Yes:Category II Is the area of herbaceous plant and deep organic soils>1/2 acre? No:Go to 2a.3 Yes:Category I Is the area of herbaceous plant and deep organic soils 1/4 to> 1/2 acre? 2a.3 is the vegetation a mixture of only herbaceous plant and sphagnum mosses with no scrub/shrub or forest classes? Yes:Category II Is the area of herbaceous plants,sphagnum,and deep organic soils>1/2 acre? Is the area of herbaceous plants,sphagnum,and deep organic soils 1/4 to 1/2 acre? Q.2b Mature Forested Wetlands Yes:Category I 2b.1 Does 50%of the cover of upper forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older than 80 years or deciduous trees older than 50 years Yes Go to 2b.2 Category I 2b.2 The size of trees rees is often not a measure of onsist of evergreen trees lderdthan 50 years,AND is the structural diversity of the forest high as 2b.2 Does 50%of the cover of forest canopy :Go to 2b.3 dharacterized by an additional layer of trees 20'-49'tall,shrubs 6'-20'tail and a herbaceous groundcover? Yes: Co to Q.3 2b.3 Does<25%of the areal cover in the herbaceous(groundcover layer or shrub layer consist of exotic species? Yes:Category I No:Co to Q3 Q.2c Estuarine Wetlands 2C.1 Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park,or Scientific Reserves No::GOt[o 2cY2 designated under WAC 332-30-151? es:Go to 2c3 2e.2 N the wetland>5 acres Note:If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegetation that are 1)less than 600 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go dry on a Mean Low Tide,OR 2)separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide;all the vegetated areas are to be considered together in the wetland area OR is e the wetland mat acres;as is the wetland<1 acre Yes:Go to 2c.4 2c.3 Minimum Does the wetland meet at least 3 n the following 4 criteria:such-Minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing or the presence of non-native plant specis: Yes:Category No Category II -Surface water connection with tidal saltwater of tidal freshwater: Nes:Category II -At least 75%of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed pasture,open water,shrub,or forest -Has at least 3 of the following features:low marsh;high marsh;tidal channels;lagoon(s)woddy debris;or contiguous freshwater wetland Yes:Category II 2c.4 Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c.3?(above)? Q2.d Eelgrass and Kelp Beds No Category 111 2d.1 Are eelgrass beds present? ? No:Ca to Category 11 2d.2 Are their floating or non-floating kelp beds present with greater than 50%macro-algal cover in the month of August or September Yes: O to Category I Q.3 Category IV Wetlands 3a.Is the wetland:less than 1 acre AND hydrologically isolated,AND comprised of one vegeted class that is dominated by one species from Table 3 or 4 Yo.9 Category t ory 3b.Is the wetland:less than 2 acres AND hydrologically isolated,with one vegetated class,and>to%areal cover in any combination of species from Table 3. No::Catego IV 3e.Is the wetland excavated from upland AND a pond smaller than 1 acre without a surface water connection to streams,rivers,lakes,or Yeos:9Cateegoo 4 IV other wetlands and has<0.1 acre of vegetation Q4.Significant Habitat Value s Points Answer all questions and enter data requested Acre are 4a.Total Wetland Area 4>2000 i 6 5 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column and score in the far column: 10-40 4 5-10 3 Enter acreage of wetland here:>40 acres,and source:Field measurement from Critical Area Maps 1-5 S 2 0.1-1 1 <0.1 0 4b.Wetland Classes:Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: of<0.1 Open Water:if the areas of open water is>1/4 acre Points Aquatic Beds:if the area of aquatic beds is>1/4 acre 1 0 Emergent:if the area of emergent class is>1/4 acre X 1 �_` 6 Scrub-Shrub:if the area of scrub-shrub class is>1/4 acre X 3 3 2 Forested:if the area of forested class is>1/4 acre 4 B Add the number of wetland classes,above,that qualify,and then score Wheon 't oking At Entire Wetland 5 10 the columns at right. e.g.4 classes+8 points. Routine Wetland Determination DATA FORM 1 (Revised) WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Cores Wetland Delineation Manual Date: 2007/02/13 Project/Site: 756 Center Road, Chimacum WA County: Jefferson Applicant/owner: Gary and Sally Baird State: WA Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin, Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. S/T/R: S14 T29N R1W � Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ® No C Yes ❑ No Community ID: ty Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes Is the area a potential problem area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: DP 1 Ex•lanation of a *Ica! or •roblem area: VEGETATION (For*strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb;V = vine) Dominant Plant S•ecies *Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant S•ecies *Stratum % cover Indicator Agrostis capillaris H 30 FAC IMNIIIIIIIIIII HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC: Check all indicators that apply and explain below: Physiological/reproductive adaptations ® Visual observation of plant species growing in ❑ Wetland plant database - -"� areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ❑ Morphological adaptations ® Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ❑ Technical Literature ❑ Other(explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ®Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: Vegetation consisted of grass that was completely grazed.. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ®Yes ❑ No Water Marks: ❑ Yes ® No Sediment Deposits: ❑Yes CI No on Based on: ® Soil temp(record temp)43.9 Drift Lines: ❑Yes ® No Drainage Patterns: El Yes ❑ No ❑ Other ex•lain season Depth of inundation: 0 inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: 0 Yes ❑ No Channels<12in.: ❑Yes ►1 No Depth to free water in pit: 15 inches FAC Neutral: ❑Yes ® No Water-stained Leaves: ❑: Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: 13 inches Check all that apply& explain below: Other(explain): ❑ Stream, lake or gage data ❑ Aerial photographs 0 Other Wetland shown on Jefferson Map Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: Water Free water in pit to 15 inches and saturated soils. Routine Wetland Determination DATA FORM 1 (Revised) WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Cores Wetland Delineation County: Manual 007/02/13 Date: Project/Site: 756 Center Road, Chimacum WA Jefferson Applicant/owner: Gary and Sally Baird State: WA Investigator(s): Dixie Llewellin, Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. S/T/R: S14 T29N R1 W No Community ID: Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes CI No Common ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? ❑Yes Is the area a potential problem area? ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID: DP 2 Ex•lanation of a .ical or .roblem area: VEGETATION (For*strata, indicate T =tree; S =shrub; H = herb;V =vine) Dominant Plant S.ecies *Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant S•ecies *Stratum % cover Indicator Elytrigia repens H 30 FACU ■__� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC: Check all indicators that apply and explain below: ® Visual observation of plant species growing in ❑ Physiological/reproductive adaptations areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ® Wetland plant database ❑ Morphological adaptations ® Personal knowledge of regional plant communities ❑ Technical Literature ❑ Other(explain) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: Vegetation consisted of grass that was completely grazed. HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ®Yes ❑ No Water Marks: ❑ Yes No Sediment Deposits: ❑Yes CI No on Based on: ® Soil temp(record temp)43.9 Drift Lines: ❑ Yes Z No Drainage Patterns: ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Other explain season Depth of inundation: none Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: ❑Yes D No Channels<12in.: ❑Yes ®No Depth to free water in pit: none FAC Neutral: ❑ Yes ® No Water-stained Leaves: Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: none Check all that apply &explain below: Other(explain): ❑ Stream, lake or gage data ❑ Aerial photographs ❑ Other Wetland shown on Jefferson Map Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: Upslope slightly from DP#1 • SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) : Bm Belfast silty clay Drainage Class: Illw-1 and IVe-1 loam,wet variant and Cassolary sandy loam°to 15% Field observations confirm mapped type? ®Yes ❑ No Slopes Taxonomy(subgroup)Typic Udifluvents,Typic Xerocrepts Profile Description Depth Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture,concretions, Drawing of soil profile match description) Sand (inches) Horizon (Munsell moist) (Munsell moist) size and contrast structure, 0-10" 10YR 3/3 faint Sandy Loam 10-16" 5Y 2/5 Sand Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) ❑Histosol ❑ Matrix chroma<_2 with mottles ❑Histic Epipedon ❑ Mg or Fe Concretions ❑Sulfidic Odor ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils ❑Aquic Moisture Regime ❑Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List CI Gleyed or Low-Chroma(=1)matrix CI Other(explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? ❑Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks:Soil chroma and listing on hydric soils list Wetland Determination Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑Yes ® No Sparse vegetation class due to grazing,remnant grass identified Hydric soils present? ❑Yes Z No Wetland hydrology present? ❑Yes ® No Is the sampling point within a wetland? ❑Yes ® No Rationale/Remarks: Data Point#2 is slightly upslope,soils had a more granular texture and were dry. NOTES: Revised 4/97 oiow- CyLkAk, ‘ .„) OrtiN \Ct XL/ 41 ( S5 41 I bac siouisrd Cpk- C( 1)703, rof?cyc-020 ,- Cte6 61,dbr-- tik_usLW 1:o . 44,6di P1-S Pr L- act- , J2Wicit (-A04) 35- 71 (a Cis,911. S drrus • rd--