HomeMy WebLinkAboutM102011•
ok
Dave Garing
Henry Krist
Michael Smith
1820 Jefferson Street
P.O. Box 1220
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Dave Gart" Henry Krist
MINUTES
October 20, 2011
Miehael Smith
Chairman
Vice - Chairman
Member
Chairman Dave Gating called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. in the presence of Vice - Chairman Henry
Krist and Member Michael Smith.
REQUEST TO RECONVENE
The Clerk of the Board stated that the request to reconvene the 2011 Board of Equalization from John
W. Wood will be postponed until further information can be obtained.
ASSESSMENT CORRECTIONS AND PETITION WITHDRAWALS
Vice - Chairman Krist moved to accept the following assessment corrections and petition withdrawals.
Member Smith seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote.
APPELLANT
Kali Tai Medical Investors, LLC
Lynn Sorenson, Trustee
Shirley Metz
L{ )>
RG Woodman & Brian Dempsey
Stephen Nielsen
APPEAL NO.
BOE 11 -23 -R
BOE 11 -30 -R
BOE 11 -35 -LO
BOE 11 -36 -LO
BOE 11 -43 -R
BOE 11 -49 -R
PARCEL NO.
949 817 101
990 600 331
921 063 015
921 063 016
721 173 006
721 174 030
Phone (360)385 -9100 Fax (360)385 -9382 jeftboca(i)co.jefferson.wa.us
Board of Equalization Minutes - October 20, 2011 Page: 2
HEARINGS
Wayne Bibbins BOE: 11 -17 -LO PN: 948 308 403
P.O. Box 1941 11 -18 -LO 948 308 406
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Wayne Bibbins was not present. Appraiser Dennis Pownall represented the Assessor's Office and was
sworn in by Chairman Gating. Under appeal is the land value of two parcels of property located at
Cleveland and 18' Street, Port Townsend.
Following is the current assessment and the Appellant's estimate of value for the parcels under
appeal:
Parcel No. Current Assessed Value Appellant's Estimate of Value
948 308 403 $70,000 (Land Only) $35,000
948 308 406 $70,000 (Land Only) $35,000
On the petition form the Appellant wrote the following reason for appealing the valuation of his
property: "A professional appraisal was conducted on parcel of exact same size and location. All
comparables sold in $30,000 to $35,000 range (4). Assessor's valuation is too high, based on: appraisal
in April 2011 came out at $35,000. That is the basis."
Appraiser Pownall informed the Board that he visited the subject property and provided a picture of a
`for sale' sign that indicates that both parcels are listed for $64,000 and $65,000. The Iisting states that
the properties have utilities (power, water, sewer). The Appellant purchased the parcels as one lot for
$61,500. He then divided the lot into two parcels and sold one lot in March, 2010 for $80,000 which has
since been repossessed by the Appellant. The Appellant is trying to sell these parcels for $64,000 and
$65,000, however the Appellant's estimate of value is $35,000 for each parcel. The Assessor's office
has placed a value of $70,000 on each parcel.
The Appellant's comparable sales occurred after the assessment date of January 1, 2009.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Garing closed the hearing. The Board will make a
determination at a later date.
George & Jane Ansley BOE: 11 -29 -LO PN: 021321 040
Ansley Living Trust
373 20'h Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
George and Jane Ansley were present. Appraiser John Pray represented the Assessor's Office. After
explaining the hearing process Chairman Gating swore in both parties. Under appeal is the land value of
Board of Equalization Minutes - October 20, 2011 Page: 3
property located at 1391 Griffith Point Road on Marrowstone Island.
Currently, the property is assessed at $215,700. The Appellants estimate the value is $175,000.
The Appellants informed the Board that they don't agree with the old value ($194,450) or the new
value. They purchased the property in 1973 with the intention to moor a boat and use for camping. On
the property currently, is an old trailer and a structure the Appellants built to be used for camping. If
they had to sell the property right now, they would ask $50,000 for the vacant lot.
Chairman Garing stated that on the Appellant's appeal form they indicated that the value was $175,000.
He then asked the Appellants if they wanted to revise their estimate of value to $50,000? They replied,
yes they would.
The Appellants checked with their neighbors and found out that their value was the only one that
increased. With no current sales in the area they don't know how the Assessor's office came to that
value. They do not have access to the beach from their property; they use a neighbors access. The
beach in front of their property consists of mud flats. They have an oyster bed, but they have to
purchase and plant them which makes for pretty expensive oysters.
Appraiser Pray provided three comparable sales. #I sold in October 2010 for $765,000. It consists of
85 front feet of waterfront (same as Appellant's property). All 3 comparable sales were assessed the
same waterfront foot rate as the Appellant's property. #2 sold for $500,000 in August, 2011 (after the
assessment rolls were closed) and it was valued at $495,255. #3 (land only) sold in November, 2009 for
$354,000. It consists of 150 front feet of waterfront. An improvement value ($10,000) for utilities was
added for a total assessed value of $349,250. He also said that the Appellant's value increased,
however the waterfront rate decreased. In 2007 most vacant parcels were given a reduction for no
available water source that could potentially make them unbuildable. Now that there is water available
on Marrowstone Island that reduction was removed which increased the value.
The Appellants submitted, with Appraiser Pray's permission, a photo taken of the property from the
road showing the beach. There was discussion regarding the installation of a water source. The
Appellants have paid the fee to get water, but are not hooked up yet.
Member Smith asked if all waterfront properties located in Mystery Bay have the same waterfront foot
rate? Appraiser Pray responded that most of the waterfront properties have the same rate. However,
some were given a reduction for mud flats and lack of view. There was discussion about the type of
topography needed to grow oysters. The Appellants said their beach is more muddy than it is rocky, but
they are able to grow oysters.
Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Garing closed the hearing. The Board will make a
determination at a later date.
Board of Equalization Minutes - October 20, 2011 Page: 4
Member Smith moved to adjourn the meeting until the next scheduled meeting. Vice - Chairman Krist
seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote.
X sR. Locke, Cle�rk�of�the Board
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
Dave Garing C airmano
Henry Krist, Vice - Chairman
Mi �SmiMember