Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2001-00179 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 DATE ISSUED: July 09, 2001 DATE EXPIRES: July 09, 2002 MLA NUMBER: MLA01-00140 PROJECT PLANNER: K RUSSELL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SHORELINE EXEMPTION: Stormwater Management System PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd, Port Hadlock, WA. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Developmen Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 3/28/0 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Landslide Hazard Area III, and Shoreline (Suburban designation). 3.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 4.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry (Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium Parvifolium). 5.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 6.) The applicant has signed a recorded a Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant for locating a single family dwelling and associated septic system within close proximity to a severe landslide hazard area. 7.) The submitted Geotechnical Report also included several building recommendations pertaining to the foundation, retaining walls and stormwater. • ' 8.) The applicant is proposing to add 6,555 square feet of impervious surface activities. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Stormwater Management Permit. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Septic, Building, and Shoreline application on 3/23/01 has been reviewed fo consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 6/20/01 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) The applicant has proposed to tightline all stormwater over the top of the marine bluff. The applicant shall adhere to all of the conditions rendered through the Shoreline Exemption Permit(SDP01-00016). 11.) This proposal has been reviewed under the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. The applicant will tightline all stormwater generated from the residence over the marine shoreline. Specific conditions are addressed through the shoreline permit(SDP01-00016). CONDITIONS: 1.) A Geotechnical Report was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. A setback of 200-feet shall be measured perpendicularly from the top or toe of the geologic hazard to the proposed Septic System and Single Family Residence. 2.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 3.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 4.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 5.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 6.) A Stormwater Management Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 7.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 8.) Building setbacks have been determined based upon the existing topography of the property. The landslide hazard area, and shoreline have created a building envelope that exceeds the minimum setback requirements. 9.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage includes all impervious surface. 10.) The applicant shall follow all construction recommendations concluded through the submitted Geotechnical Report. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at (206)526-6613, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503) 231-6121. Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related tojudical appeals see UDC Section 8.5.2. A UDC Administrator E il 'N JWS Design Associates �4°/��_. 8924 121 Avenue SE i ' �V= . Newcastle, WA 98056 _ SEP i P_KS,I g al (425) 226-5750 A q ;� =es (42.5) 227-6363 fax JEFFERSON t,OUN1Y DEPT OF COMMUNIIN OFv. September 12, 2000 To: Al Scalf, Jefferson County Community Development Division 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Al, Last November(approx.), Marc Mauney, Owner and, Steve Kunkel, Builder had a meeting with yourself,Warren Hart, Sue Theiss and, Michael Ajax regarding construction of a new residence structure on Marc's property at 2131 and/or 2137 Oak Bay Road. Per the outcome of that meeting,we have been directed to send copy of our preliminary site plan for your initial review and approval. Also find attached a copy of the soils report, Engineers letter of acknowledgement of a structural solution, conceptual building section (on site plan). A brief narrative of our intended design direction and structural solution for the adverse site condition(unstable soils)will be a fairly simple structure residing on a "rafted" structural slab foundation system. The Structural Engineering firm we are working with, Anderson—Peyton has both the experience and expertise for this type of construction method. Their background in designing with it usually relates to much larger,more complex projects and sites, so we, and they are confident in this design scenario. The wood frame portion of the structure directly above the slab level will be maintained as open framing as much as possible. This will allow for any periodic adjustment to columns and connections between slab and living area levels above. Above this level will be typical wood frame construction utilizing manufactured framing elements such as "TJI"type joists and P.E. roof trusses. All construction will be per 1997 UBC criteria,Washington State Energy Code, Uniform Mech. and Plumbing Codes, and as they may be applied by your jurisdiction. Our firm is known for working co-operatively with building jurisdictions and having a high regard for structure and life safety issues in residential design. As we understand the process, your office will review this information and respond with comments and ultimately a preliminary approval that Jefferson County will accept application for and, issue a building permit for this project. Our next step upon receiving your written approval will be to complete all permit application documents including structural calculations and drawings for prompt submittal. We are looking forward to working with you and your staff and if we can be of further service in answering any questions or comments that may arise in your review process .lease contact me. a o , 4 s on S Design Assoc. CC: Marc Mauney, Owner G E 0 T E C H 13256 Northeast 20th Street,Suite 16 Bellevue,Washington 98005 CONSULTANTS, INC. (425)747-5618 FAX(425)747-8561 July 3, 2000 JN 00071 Marc Mauney 3821 Cascadia Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98188 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations Proposed Mauney Residence 2137 Oak Bay Road Jefferson County, Washington Dear Mr. Mauney: This letter presents our professional geotechnical opinions related to the stability of the subject property and the feasibility of constructing a new residence on the site. The scope of our work has consisted of the following: • Visiting the site once on February 16, 2000 to observe the existing site conditions and to monitor the excavation of four test pits on the property. • Discussing with you and John Simpson, your architect, the historical landslide information provided to you through discussions with Jefferson County personnel. • Developing this summary report. No test borings were completed for our assessment of the geology that underlies the site. Our work was authorized by your acceptance of our confirming proposal dated May 24, 2000. Based on our discussions with you and John Simpson, we anticipate that you intend to construct a single-family home on the property. Initially, this new house was to be located immediately west of the existing residence. However, following our preliminary assessment, and numerous discussions with both you and John Simpson, the house site has been shifted further upsiope of the initial location. We were provided with a copy of the May 12, 2000 Conceptual Site Plan that illustrates the new house site. This plan contains a cross-section that indicates the house to consist of two floors over a daylight basement level. The lowest floor elevation is indicated to be 356 feet, which is up to approximately 5 feet below the existing grade. We anticipate that 3 to 4 feet of fill will be placed behind the west wall of the house for the driveway and sidewalks that will be located at the elevation of the main floor (366 feet). SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The subject property is a large, trapezoidal-shaped lot situated along Oak Bay in unincorporated Jefferson County. The provided property dimensions indicate that the size covers a total area of Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 2 10.2 acres. At the time of our site visit, the property was occupied by several structures. There is a primary residence and a smaller house located in the southeastern portion of the site. This area also contains several outbuildings (carport, pump house, and shed). Two sheds and a small trailer were located in the eastern, central, portion of the lot. An unpaved driveway curves through the western two-thirds of the property from Oak Bay Road. With the exception of the driveway and yard areas, much of the site is covered with medium to large-sized trees. The ground surface on the property generally slopes gently to moderately down toward the east. The eastern approximately two-thirds of the site exhibits hummocky topography, with several relatively-level bench areas separated by short, steep slopes. The proposed house site is located on one of these benches. We observed many of the trees growing on, and above, the steep slopes to have multiple curves in their trunks. This occurs in both deciduous and evergreen trees. Near the angled eastern property line is a very steep bluff that drops to the beach along Oak Bay. The height of this bluff increases from north to south. Based on our observations, the face of this bluff is subjected to undercutting from wave attack, and has undergone recent slope movement. The face of the taller, southern, portion of the bluff was bare of vegetation. This bare area extended onto the adjoining southern property. In the central portion of the site is a set of timber stairs that originally provided access down to the beach. These stairs have been wracked and distorted by slope movement within the last few years, with no indications of attempts to repair the damage. We also observed slide debris and trees accumulated on the beach from a landslide on the bluff further south of the site. In addition to the shallow soil movement that appears to have occurred in the recent past on the face of the bluff, we noted a wide tension crack between the primary residence and the top of the bluff. This tension crack was located 5 to 10 feet from the crest of the bluff, indicating that a relatively large mass of soil is experiencing failure. Similarly, a large tension crack was noted on the downslope edge of the driveway near the northern end of the property. The approximate locations of these tension cracks are shown on the attached reduced copy of the Conceptual Site Plan. Understanding of Landslide History Our understanding of the landslide history in the area is based on information you have gained from discussions with Jefferson County personnel, and local design professionals. We understand that slope movement frequently requires regrading or repaving of Oak Bay Road adjacent to the site. Immediately northeast of the site is a house that has been affected by slope movement. While we did not observe this house closely, it appears to be located on a bench area above the very steep bluff. We understand that Jefferson County has deemed this house as unsafe for habitation due to serious structural distress from the slope movement. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits at the approximate locations shown on the attached reduced copy of the Conceptual Site Plan. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, subsurface conditions encountered during exploration, and the presence of buried utilities. The test pits were excavated during our February 16, 2000 site visit with a trackhoe. The undersigned principal engineer observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 3 of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. No test pit logs are attached, but a detailed discussion of the conditions encountered in the explorations is provided in the following paragraphs. In addition to the test pits, we evaluated the subsurface conditions by examining the conditions exposed on the very steep, eastern bluff. Soil Conditions The four test pits were excavated to depths of 13 to 15 feet and encountered subsurface conditions that were generally similar. The soil revealed throughout the full depth of the test pits consisted of loose, gravelly, silty sand that contained small to large fragments of dense glacial till. Glacial till is a glacially-compressed mixture of gravel, silt and sand. Interspersed throughout this loose soil matrix were pockets of organics. Based on our observations, the soil encountered in the test pits has been disturbed and broken up by past slope movement. No indications of intact soil were noted to the maximum 15-foot depth of the explorations. Caving of the loose soils was observed in several of the test pits. The near-surface soils observed on the eastern bluff appear to consist of disturbed soils, similar to those found in the test pits. Near the base of the taller portions of the bluff, we observed what appears to be heavily-fractured, weathered sandstone. No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, or on the eastern bluff. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our explorations and observations, and the information provided to us regarding the landslide history of the site vicinity, it appears that the subject property lies within a large landslide mass that extends at least from Oak Bay to Oak Bay Road. No intact soils were encountered in the test pits, indicating that the slide plane lies beyond a depth of 15 feet. The presence of isolated benches separated by what appear to be slide scarps indicates that there are smaller slide blocks within the larger landslide mass. The presence of trees with curved trunks on the slide scarps is an indication that there has been at least some movement within the life of the trees. The neighboring affected house to the north appears to be situated on an individual slide block. In addition to the overall, larger landslide, we noted indications of incipient slope failures on the steep bluff and along the edge of the driveway. The landslide mass may be the result of ancient movement occurring several hundred or several thousand years ago. The more recent movement is likely the result of remobilization of all, or a part of, the landslide mass by excessive groundwater. Large earthquakes can also trigger movement in ancient landslide masses. Given the available information, it appears that movement of at least individual blocks occurs periodically within the larger landslide mass. This movement can be expected to continue in the future. It is impossible to accurately predict the frequency and magnitude of future slope movements that could occur. In recent years, we are familiar with several large, ancient landslides that have been reactivated following extended periods of wet weather. The size of the landslide GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 4 mass and the unknown depth to stable soil appears to make stabilization unfeasible for a single residence. As we have discussed, it is our opinion that the site could be developed with another residence, if the owners were willing to accept the likelihood that future soil movement will occur. Occupied structures would need to be constructed in such a manner as to limit the potential for catastrophic collapse in the event of continued movement of the landslide mass. Also, the development must not increase the potential for instability. We anticipate that Jefferson County will require a signed hold harmless before they will allow construction of a new home in a known landslide that will not be stabilized. The recommendations of this report are intended to provide safety for the occupants of the residence, by preventing rapid collapse of the foundation system due to any one episode of slope movement. Our recommendations are not intended to prevent damage to the residence and other improvements, or to ensure that these elements are usable after slope movement occurs. The proposed house location is in the center of a bench area, which may be smaller slide block. This will prevent the foundations from spanning over a known scarp in the overall slide mass. If large downsets or tension cracks form during future slope movement, they are most likely to occur at the old scarps around the bench areas. The house can be constructed on a conventional foundation system or a mat foundation, provided they are heavily reinforced to span across tension cracks and downsets that may form during future movement of the landslide mass. The construction techniques should allow for future relevelling of the floors and walls in the event of small amounts of slope movement. If large movement occurs, it could be necessary to reconstruct the foundation system entirely. Ongoing slope movement could cause damage to on-grade elements, such as the driveway, decks, or slabs, or to utilities. Maintenance and repair of this damage should be anticipated. If the incipient slope failure along the east side of the driveway progresses, it may be necessary to reconstruct the driveway on the northern end of the property. Recession of the bluff face can be expected to continue. This process can be slowed, but not stopped, by constructing a bulkhead along the beach. Continued movement of the slope may push over the bulkhead, requiring possible periodic maintenance and repair. The proposed setback of over 200 feet from the face of the bluff should be more than adequate to protect the residence from damage due to continued recession of the bluff. Water from drains and impervious surfaces should not be discharged on, or close to, the eastern bluff. Alternatively, water could be discharged onto the ground near the house in a uniform fashion, or the water could be tigthlined to a discharge point located on the beach below the bluff. Only minor fill placement is planned on the upslope side of the residence. This should not adversely affect the stability of the landslide mass. We recommend that fill placed on the eastern, downslope, side of the house be limited to approximately 2 feet in thickness, and that the fill not reach further east than the existing driveway. No clearing or grading, other than possible removal of the existing residences, should occur within 50 feet of the crest of the bluff. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. I Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 5 We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. Additionally, a copy of this report should be provided to future property owners so they may be aware of our findings and recommendations. CONVENTIONAL OR MAT FOUNDATION The house can be supported using an on-grade, shallow foundation system that has been heavily- reinforced to reduce the potential for catastrophic differential settlement. This can be accom- plished either using a series of interconnected continuous footings that are similar to grade beams, or a mat foundation. These foundations would bear on at least 12 inches of compacted crushed rock placed over firm soils underlying any topsoil or existing fill. We recommend that continuous footings have a minimum width of 16 inches. The footings or mat should be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. Continuous footings or a mat foundations should be sufficiently rigid to theoretically be able to span a minimum distance of 10 feet without soil support. This requirement will likely govern the reinforcement for a mat foundation, rather that utilizing a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 kips per cubic foot (kcf) for the design. An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings or a mat supported as recommended above. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: PARANIETER VALUE Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Where: (i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and(II) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above 9 P P 9 will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type So (Stiff Soil). The GENERAL section contains an additional discussion of seismic considerations related to slope stability and foundation design. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Rainey JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 6 PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: P.ARANIETER DESIGN VALUE Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 135 pcf Where: (i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. • For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. No safety factor is included in the passive and friction values. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The on-site GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 7 soils should not be reused as wall backfill, due to their poor drainage characteristics and low compacted strength. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. Where necessary, surface drains should be provided to collect run-off and prevent ponding of water behind walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. The performance of subsurface drainage systems will degrade over time. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where moist conditions or some seepage through the walls are not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be provided around the perimeter of the structure, and at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 1. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, or an excavation encounters significant seepage. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Water from roof, storm water, and foundation drains should not be discharged on, or near, the eastern bluff. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits and observed in the soils exposures on the bluff are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those anticipated, we should be advised at once GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 8 so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. As discussed in the GENERAL section, the recommendations presented in this report are directed toward the protection of only the proposed structure from collapse due to slope movement. Predicting the future behavior of the identified landslide mass is an inexact and imperfect science that is currently based mostly on the past behavior of slopes with similar characteristics. The owner must ultimately accept the likelihood that some future slope movement could occur, possibly requiring repair or reconstruction of the house, driveway, utilities, or other on-grade elements. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Marc Mauney, and his representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and our understanding of the previous landslide history of the site. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with the scope of our services outlined in our proposal. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. ADDITIONAL SERV ICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Reduced Copy of Conceptual Site Plan Plate 1 Typical Footing Drain Detail GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 9 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Ft,• MCQ Fre • d° OH • wst ff/ 27845 44 ', :. IP o� —ONALE7f3J7CCf-D I EXPIRES 10/25/ZZc�1� Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal cc: JWS Design Associate-John Simpson MRM/JHS: mrm GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • - NOJJ049"W I 00 00 i a S J , — j >,v a --- ,_ -~ a v o _ — �,T r k /. p i 1 w e iT' I I t i i I.f /v t f. / i f:'� 1 -1 j 1 I V g r/ t,r i..• , 1- w i�.•( o .•\ z 4' ' .'may i/. ./ ! \. A _ / a \ \ l''','...-:i... ------ I 1 __ \ V t \ q 4,X, .t.-..._..........- i. . . , . - ••.,: \ N. / vim\.\ \ �� , 1 J I J (II i �- W 1 41:• t >Yt' i. $ m re^ � �r / 11 + PaV�I di I 15, If r._.`J J"Jr M j...fffff 'f "� r f 1 /f ,7, . } r1 I1 i; ,-;;: :i LS m N J % UM q 41 9 W a ; 94 a 11111 C r I I I 11 it 8 wi ; I I r 1 a bi D 4 :ICr 1 0J0 5CO ice;. mz 400 A—: .P sin zm ,. .� ail yi 1..E c r r • N,`,,4,fr V. atV.," o=° MAUNEY / ROGERSON MARC MAUNEY & 6= " 9 6c LYNNE ROGERSON °!? GCA o �.. S Sal c. RESIDENCE ...- OAK BAY ROAD Pc qa _ U JEFFERSON COUNTY, WA zz O =W' I 1 (f) VI Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface drains where necessary. Ton Roof (Do ightli not connect e to Drain footing drain) Backfill co (See text for '_ requirements) o Ilk Ilk -tea Vapor Retarder Nonwoven Geotextile c c or Barrier Filter Fabric ..... Washed Rock u. SLAB (7/8" min. size) ' �o O"9 o v° •__ r0 O , , o .o°.0 a o o o p o° 0,0_o•o!I•.o o,0 ,,o-•.oo...%Ca o o :Q i q :aDFoO °:c .ep o.np o°o . -°,0,0 .° ° ,0,0 : °ce0 , o90 0 � on` .a, 6" min. :°_:�:a:°--� — -J all Free-Draining Gravel (if appropriate) 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) NOTES: (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage and waterproofing considerations. 4 TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN GEOTECH 2137 Oak Bay Road CONSULTANTS, INC. Jefferson County, Washington -,, - , Job No: I Date: I Scale: ' Plate: 00071 June 2000 Not to Scale 1 "It - Jefferson County Health 6.Human Services - 'f lj y `, t ni4 4.4 CASTLE HILL CENTER • 615 SHERIDAN • PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 Tillman Engi -ering, Inc. May 8, 2001 C/O Eric Page P.O. Box 1375 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Re: SEP01-00044,2133 Oak Bay Rd. Dear Mr. Page, On March 28, 2001, you submitted an application for a septic system at the above- mentioned property. Two site visits were made, the first, by myself on April 12 and the second on May 7, 2001, in which I requested Linda Atkins to review the site for a second opinion. A hold harmless agreement between the owner and the county and a storm water plan are still pending for this application to be complete. In addition, there are three issues to be addressed regarding the septic system: • You have submitted a proposed 4 bedroom septic system design, with a sand filter followed by a mound. The mound is designed with a 10 foot wide bed width. In the Mound guidelines, to determine bed width, soil type and depth are matched to establish maximum infiltration bed widths per Table 2, Appendix B. This table requires no wider than a 5 foot wide bed to be utilized in soils less than 18 inches deep. It is our opinion that the design of a ten-foot wide bed in the mound is not appropriate for the soils observed for the primary and secondary mound areas. Soil log#2 showed soils that were very wet at 12 inches and distinctly mottled at 14". Soil log#3 showed soils to be extremely cemented and massive below 12"- 13" on the upslope side of the hole. In soil log # 6, you indicate distinct mottling at 11 inches and#1 shows fill to 14". • WAC 246-272-09501 (4) (d) states that disposal components be designed in stable ground. The geotechnical report submitted with the plan indicates that this parcel is very unstable and additionally states "future slope movement could require maintenance of elements of the septic system. This would most likely occur in the form of repairing leaks in the pipes that extend from the house to the sand filter and the pressure distribution bed." How will you address the maintenance, protection, and prevention of this "leakage"with your design? Have you considered piping without joints, type of piping or placement, installation requirements? Is the mound designed in"stable" ground? • The mound guidelines (2.3.1) state that "a minimum of 12 inches of undisturbed, unsaturated, original soil is required when the mound.....". The geotechnical report states that"no indications of intact soil were noted to the maximum 15 foot depth of (4) excavations". None of the soils you have proposed for this design were evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. However, one of the test pits HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENTAL ALCOHOUDRUG DEPARTMENT HEALTH DISABILITIES ABUSE CENTER FAX 360/385-9400 360/385-9444 360/385-9400 360/385-9435 360/385-9401 • Mauney Property 5/8/01 Page 2 of 2 evaluated was located downslope of the proposed drainfield, at the base of the hillside, in the vicinity of an existing open test hole near the driveway. When comparing the soil profile of those in the proposed drainfield design area with the one at the base of the hillside, it appears that they are not very different, and all of the holes evaluated may then be considered "disturbed", as the geotechnical engineer suggests. Please provide your justification for meeting the requirement of this soil being undisturbed. In conclusion, it appears that the supplemental geotechnical memo does not adequately address the concerns stated above, with regard to the requirement of stable and undisturbed soil. Please have the geotechnical engineer respond to these issues, and if necessary address these items in your design. If you have any questions please give me a call. Appeal from a decision by the Health Officer pursuant to WAC 246-272 may be made by filing a written request with the Jefferson County Board of Health within 15 days of the decision. Sinc ly, , i /-"Y'(_ K/4-te ____ t3 Susan Porto R.S. Jefferson County Health and Human Services Cc: Marc Mauney, Owner C/O Steve Kunkel Kevin Russell, DCD 1 GE O TECH 13256 Northeast 20th Street,Suite 16 Bellevue,Washington 98005 CONSULTANTS, INC. (425)747-5618 FAX(425)747-8561 ECiEodC July 3, 2000 MA t 2 8 2.. :: JN 00071 Marc Mauney JEFFERSON COUNTY 3821 Cascadia Avenue South DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Seattle, Washington 98188 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations Proposed Mauney Residence 2133 Oak Bay Road Jefferson County, Washington Dear Mr. Mauney: This letter presents our professional geotechnical opinions related to the stability of the subject property and the feasibility of constructing a new residence on the site. The scope of our work has consisted of the following: • Visiting the site once on February 16, 2000 to observe the existing site conditions and to monitor the excavation of four test pits on the property. • Discussing with you and John Simpson, your architect, the historical landslide information provided to you through discussions with Jefferson County personnel. • Developing this summary report. No test borings were completed for our assessment of the geology that underlies the site. Our work was authorized by your acceptance of our confirming proposal dated May 24, 2000. Based on our discussions with you and John Simpson, we anticipate that you intend to construct a single-family home on the property. Initially, this new house was to be located immediately west of the existing residence. However, following our preliminary assessment, and numerous discussions with both you and John Simpson, the house site has been shifted further upslope of the initial location. We were provided with a copy of the May 12, 2000 Conceptual Site Plan that illustrates the new house site. This plan contains a cross-section that indicates the house to consist of two floors over a daylight basement level. The lowest floor elevation is indicated to be 356 feet, which is up to approximately 5 feet below the existing grade. We anticipate that 3 to 4 feet of fill will be placed behind the west wall of the house for the driveway and sidewalks that will be located at the elevation of the main floor (366 feet). SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The subject property is a large, trapezoidal-shaped lot situated along Oak Bay in unincorporated Jefferson County. The provided property dimensions indicate that the size covers a total area of ECEHE Marc Mauney D JN 00071 July 3, 2000 MAN 2 8 2u01 Page 10.2 acres. At the time of our site visit, the property was .ccupieGt i 1AUM pis. There is a primary residence and a smaller house located in the ',: '1� N•, X11:• j - ite. This area also contains several outbuildings (carport, pump house, and shed). Two sheds and a small trailer were located in the eastern, central, portion of the lot. An unpaved driveway curves through the western two-thirds of the property from Oak Bay Road. With the exception of the driveway and yard areas, much of the site is covered with medium to large-sized trees. The ground surface on the property generally slopes gently to moderately down toward the east. The eastern approximately two-thirds of the site exhibits hummocky topography, with several relatively-level bench areas separated by short, steep slopes. The proposed house site is located on one of these benches. We observed many of the trees growing on, and above, the steep slopes to have multiple curves in their trunks. This occurs in both deciduous and evergreen trees. Near the angled eastern property line is a very steep bluff that drops to the beach along Oak Bay. The height of this bluff increases from north to south. Based on our observations, the face of this bluff is subjected to undercutting from wave attack, and has undergone recent slope movement. The face of the taller, southern, portion of the bluff was bare of vegetation. This bare area extended onto the adjoining southern property. In the central portion of the site is a set of timber stairs that originally provided access down to the beach. These stairs have been wracked and distorted by slope movement within the last few years, with no indications of attempts to repair the damage. We also observed slide debris and trees accumulated on the beach from a landslide on the bluff further south of the site. In addition to the shallow soil movement that appears to have occurred in the recent past on the face of the bluff, we noted a wide tension crack between the primary residence and the top of the bluff. This tension crack was located 5 to 10 feet from the crest of the bluff, indicating that a relatively large mass of soil is experiencing failure. Similarly, a large tension crack was noted on the downslope edge of the driveway near the northern end of the property. The approximate locations of these tension cracks are shown on the attached reduced copy of the Conceptual Site Plan. Understanding of Landslide History Our understanding of the landslide history in the area is based on information you have gained from discussions with Jefferson County personnel, and local design professionals. We understand that slope movement frequently requires regrading or repaving of Oak Bay Road adjacent to the site. Immediately northeast of the site is a house that has been affected by slope movement. While we did not observe this house closely, it appears to be located on a bench area above the very steep bluff. We understand that Jefferson County has deemed this house as unsafe for habitation due to serious structural distress from the slope movement. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits at the approximate locations shown on the attached reduced copy of the Conceptual Site Plan. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, subsurface conditions encountered during exploration, and the presence of buried utilities. The test pits were excavated during our February 16, 2000 site visit with a trackhoe. The undersigned principal engineer observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney I _ JN 00071 July 3, 2000 .1 " J Page 3 'UNTx. - of selected subsurface soil were collected from the baei ket; . Pfo tertViSit3Pdike attached, but a detailed discussion of the conditions encountered in the explorations is provided in the following paragraphs. In addition to the test pits, we evaluated the subsurface conditions by examining the conditions exposed on the very steep, eastern bluff. Soil Conditions The four test pits were excavated to depths of 13 to 15 feet and encountered subsurface conditions that were generally similar. The soil revealed throughout the full depth of the test pits consisted of loose, gravelly, silty sand that contained small to large fragments of dense glacial till. Glacial till is a glacially-compressed mixture of gravel, silt and sand. Interspersed throughout this loose soil matrix were pockets of organics. Based on our observations, the soil encountered in the test pits has been disturbed and broken up by past slope movement. No indications of intact soil were noted to the maximum 15-foot depth of the explorations. Caving of the loose soils was observed in several of the test pits. The near-surface soils observed on the eastern bluff appear to consist of disturbed soils, similar to those found in the test pits. Near the base of the taller portions of the bluff, we observed what appears to be heavily-fractured, weathered sandstone. No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, or on the eastern bluff. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL Based on the results of our explorations and observations, and the information provided to us regarding the landslide history of the site vicinity. it appears that the subject property lies within a large landslide mass that extends at least from Oak Bay to Oak Bay Road. No intact soils were encountered in the test pits, indicating that the slide plane lies beyond a depth of 15 feet. The presence of isolated benches separated by what appear to be slide scarps indicates that there are smaller slide blocks within the larger landslide mass. The presence of trees with curved trunks on the slide scarps is an indication that there has been at least some movement within the life of the trees. The neighboring affected house to the north appears to be situated on an individual slide block. In addition to the overall, larger landslide, we noted indications of incipient slope failures on the steep bluff and along the edge of the driveway. The landslide mass may be the result of ancient movement occurring several hundred or several thousand years ago. The more recent movement is likely the result of remobilization of all, or a part of, the landslide mass by excessive groundwater. Large earthquakes can also trigger movement in ancient landslide masses. Given the available information, it appears that movement of at least individual blocks occurs periodically within the larger landslide mass. This movement can be expected to continue in the future. It is impossible to accurately predict the frequency and magnitude of future slope movements that could occur. In recent years, we are familiar with several large, ancient landslides that have been reactivated following extended periods of wet weather. The size of the landslide GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 4 MAi+. 2 8 Luft mass and the unknown depth to stable soil appears to ak- s •zampaamtIasible for a single residence. As we have discussed, it is our opinion that t19C?§itf botAllb16 448 '-Twth another residence, if the owners were willing to accept the likelihood that future soil movement will occur. Occupied structures would need to be constructed in such a manner as to limit the potential for catastrophic collapse in the event of continued movement of the landslide mass. Also, the development must not increase the potential for instability. We anticipate that Jefferson County will require a signed hold harmless before they will allow construction of a new home in a known landslide that will not be stabilized. The recommendations of this report are intended to provide safety for the occupants of the residence, by preventing rapid collapse of the foundation system due to any one episode of slope movement. Our recommendations are not intended to prevent damage to the residence and other improvements, or to ensure that these elements are usable after slope movement occurs. The proposed house location is in the center of a bench area, which may be smaller slide block. This will prevent the foundations from spanning over a known scarp in the overall slide mass. If large downsets or tension cracks form during future slope movement, they are most likely to occur at the old scarps around the bench areas. The house can be constructed on a conventional foundation system or a mat foundation, provided they are heavily reinforced to span across tension cracks and downsets that may form during future movement of the landslide mass. The construction techniques should allow for future relevelling of the floors and walls in the event of small amounts of slope movement. If large movement occurs, it could be necessary to reconstruct the foundation system entirely. Ongoing slope movement could cause damage to on-grade elements, such as the driveway, decks, or slabs, or to utilities. Maintenance and repair of this damage should be anticipated. If the incipient slope failure along the east side of the driveway progresses, it may be necessary to reconstruct the driveway on the northern end of the property. Recession of the bluff face can be expected to continue. This process can be slowed, but not stopped, by constructing a bulkhead along the beach. Continued movement of the slope may push over the bulkhead, requiring possible periodic maintenance and repair. The proposed setback of over 200 feet from the face of the bluff should be more than adequate to protect the residence from damage due to continued recession of the bluff. Water from drains and impervious surfaces should not be discharged on, or close to, the eastern bluff. Alternatively, water could be discharged onto the ground near the house in a uniform fashion, or the water could be tigthlined to a discharge point located on the beach below the bluff. Only minor fill placement is planned on the upslope side of the residence. This should not adversely affect the stability of the landslide mass. We recommend that fill placed on the eastern, downslope, side of the house be limited to approximately 2 feet in thickness, and that the fill not reach further east than the existing driveway. No clearing or grading, other than possible removal of the existing residences, should occur within 50 feet of the crest of the bluff. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney Q JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 5 MAR 2 8 ^` 1 We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. Additionally, a copy of this report should be provided to future g€¢w N2tQi¢f¢ v they may be aware of our findings and recommendations. DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONVENTIONAL OR MAT FOUNDATION The house can be supported using an on-grade, shallow foundation system that has been heavily- reinforced to reduce the potential for catastrophic differential settlement. This can be accom- plished either using a series of interconnected continuous footings that are similar to grade beams, or a mat foundation. These foundations would bear on at least 12 inches of compacted crushed rock placed over firm soils underlying any topsoil or existing fill. We recommend that continuous footings have a minimum width of 16 inches. The footings or mat should be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for frost protection. Continuous footings or a mat foundations should be sufficiently rigid to theoretically be able to span a minimum distance of 10 feet without soil support. This requirement will likely govern the reinforcement for a mat foundation, rather that utilizing a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 kips per cubic foot (kcf) for the design. An allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings or a mat supported as recommended above. A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following ultimate values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: PARAMETER VALUE Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Where: (i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and(ii) passive earth pressure Is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above ultimate values. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type SD (Stiff Soil). The GENERAL section contains an additional discussion of seismic considerations related to slope stability and foundation design. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney �p 2 00071 July 3, 2000 D l!I 15 -age 6 MAR 2 8 2001 PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS JEFFERSON COUNTY I P 0 n M N TY DEVELOPMENT Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designee „ -- - • - - - - . . - ures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: PARAMETER DESIGN VALUE Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 300 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 135 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. * For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. No safety factor is included in the passive and friction values. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The on-site GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Marc Mauney D ►F�•0 1� July 3, 2000 P. !- r MAR 2 8 ^n,"• soils should not be reused as wall backfill, due to their poor d ainau - . - - - • • _ a JEFFERSON COUNTY low compacted Strength. DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. Where necessary, surface drains should be provided to collect run-off and prevent ponding of water behind walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. The performance of subsurface drainage systems will degrade over time. Therefore, waterproofing should be provided where moist conditions or some seepage through the walls are not acceptable. This typically includes limiting cold-joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains should be provided around the perimeter of the structure, and at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 1. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, or an excavation encounters significant seepage. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Water from roof, storm water, and foundation drains should not be discharged on, or near, the eastern bluff. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits and observed in the soils exposures on the bluff are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those anticipated, we should be advised at once GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. ECEEIVE Marc Mauney 071 July 3, 2000 MAR 2 8 2001 e 8 so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recq e O likiIt;G �@IeR ry. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on cors ruction its and cannot be tully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. As discussed in the GENERAL section, the recommendations presented in this report are directed toward the protection of only the proposed structure from collapse due to slope movement. Predicting the future behavior of the identified landslide mass is an inexact and imperfect science that is currently based mostly on the past behavior of slopes with similar characteristics. The owner must ultimately accept the likelihood that some future slope movement could occur, possibly requiring repair or reconstruction of the house, driveway, utilities, or other on-grade elements. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Marc Mauney, and his representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and our understanding of the previous landslide history of the site. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with the scope of our services outlined in our proposal. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. ADDITIONAL SERV ICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Reduced Copy of Conceptual Site Plan Plate 1 Typical Footing Drain Detail GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. , Marc Mauney JN 00071 July 3, 2000 Page 9 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. f- 1 �G OF WASk " i' ,S.c l G i MAR 2 8 2001 �- • LI) - o s JEFFERSON COUNTY 278x5 �� IR DEPT. OF COMM�NIN DEVELOP?" '0� 4), 27TE4�2 �w SSIONAL S'' ' 7/3/z I EXPIRES 10/25/2 1 C Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal cc: JWS Design Associate-John Simpson MRM/JHS: mrm ii GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. , I . .• . . •.- • • C3 0 t-0 ..--1 0 0:11r1 L:3 grn VII C 0 c===1 00 Z.-Z 0 c=, 0 c 0 ra z ...-• 01 r" 0 -0 5.12 C:: 1 -I ---—- ____...--- __-••••• ... -- - NOCr70.49-W I 00.00 E E _______ ------ _ ------- )1V 0 I, I.. 7--a-T■ ..'. ' L___...-- J.V g _-------------- V ii ..----------- ZI-------- ---- _------- ...."-- \ ( , F. I I V .....-r'' o 1 ' `:i ‘• ...--- i g/ / I i I I I ■ 1 t E , •, ,......-:.,—,..,, 1 1 b i •••••-• s,,:...--:....„...,-, I I ,/.., i ,7"-4 -.. N ■:. I /VI • r • N: Ns ci ' 1 //./ 1 1 l:IA 1 ..'1 I \'' 1 iii. .-i r N.. . \.S1 tl n. I 1 N .. ...e,x :,. , , - i N..... -,\•...--,-,_.1_,-,---. .:, A `v .: ; I .....,t --:.._:_LL.,-.--- a ------ N: I r'N, -,... t.'----------- ‘'-N•,.:l; 1• ,. .,,....--.--f--....„ ------..„„. LI \,....\ c „..- .....'"' , I , -..., ,, ..;, Pi ,.. ki .,. \.- \ ., SI . .. ...,' 1 ''''',. • - . %• \,'N‘.1,‘ I 2. . •--0- „. .,, rkx. I I .4 . ..- 1. -, . ; 1 • \ i / / ;S:-.4::::N:■\'' %.%,,g „..„ ',4 /4-44mrs\ \.5N, .' Villidegra I, f ) 1 s:\ 1 C.4 V C-1 ., , .i. / / I. ..1 ( I • \ r ...._...") ; , A, i. 2-.-_-.---...1 \ • ;•. . ---• ,,..., •, 1 .1 1.4, 4.,....,.2-..:.___.,---..„,.... ..s.\.:41t..... ... i 'g • ...... . .''' \t I . .-....." I l_ ,...... ----'''''...::-....:-----^-...' '.*.. ,.. --'..„ ',:::,...cr. I I,'..:1/ '...,..-.--"--'7',.....!.7.:1.•.••-MC...''... r 1 ..... ' r,■..1;tki 1 I../ it ...... .46,:-...'k --::::::::.. ...,.----72"--..... ...,,:--". ,l'.-1:--- ,a..-3r*"......----------:SiZ,::::: t r, 1 /I i -6- -:'--r ---'a-7. --•'';''''.:;;'''-..Titi"."--- t, )4.4- -"--- ''' ''t' CD I u)I .....' )i'''''' - i i / >r:-.;,...!-. ...___•■1..1C-11 : : ...._‘.. .1,,,,,-- , .... ti...--...- ,-. , ‘, ihip..i ' --00.A.--.-- :.77,t,--.,,:.!%::.-'',' ...1, ,----.:-. . , / ... ,..- .... TI . i i f,..s. .... . _. ,-:v3,-,....,-, ...-:--.--..,..--..--,..,'..k..1 0 ;.- '' .,, ,\ i ...f , ,, :-:::: 4 :::..-^Mir":...'. e-'44 ; -r--''''' - '"..''. • '''' • I--'II-Ili) I''A / I. 1. . ./..'''1::-.. •-...-: -.:2NPRi.:::-/-•-?-•-':.--.-'1.. •' - --:::,az--z.;:-.:•;;N:',s' = I 1 '.. I ___lit, -. ,L..,.• ' / ,:t` , >,:;-----:i-.::;:Fs.--..:::::.5:::::::•;'''.- ::;*::A", 0 ...„_- --;:).-:- i r' '-r---?"- ----1.--::::".___:-Z:—.-" --3.: ,d,• ... N." . :;.. I - , -%---7.. . :..........-. ._... ._,., ......,..-v ...,,,....;44, ...._- ------- rI) r-' - t - ------:-,,, 4-„ ,.... ‘ i ---- / f -::-..-_-;e .- .1!=-'-••••----" ) \\ 1 \I i i f-,_.-----.` i ,------74- I „1 \\ \. p g 14 O. / / // ..... 1 /, , , ....:„.....„..--t / / I\ \-. '- -----'''.--■:"" Id 4/ -7--1)2:7( \ \ <1 /---. 9015 i3 4', Ill _ \ ' l 149 , AA ...---i- ."--tA --- ................... .. .... 1 I ME 1 .'l 11.41••• ; 1 Fa ; • • '''• ' t M ;I ‘N ' 'p i il i III i ti '1 1 1 11 II. = a I 1 1 4 i 1 11 0 #. 1 I V^ 1 "...., a a 4 1 H i 1 i 11 i 2 7 0 - i 4 I 0 V<: * ign SS''''''''' 4: • 0 II 1 1 1 ■ i A- 1 ° 1 1 I !A; , I> A:• A • __,‹ . E cn o , i P 0 ., !..,L.- o .i.,,, _-71 1,.r z ee . I M Z 1 CI 0 A e •'Kr li ••SP' ..-c, , /111 Z A 11 r- -a ......._........... c • ••%*•Te•N > _A 1- **Aft: II q ■ z itt114%.' li it 440', 1 42•••■■ >, 0 rt ; , • %.0 1 P.! 7 ITP r -81 ...-.. ,1 t d=li 1 °.toi MAUNEY / ROGERSON MARC MAUNEY & k, •;:.4. .7. ' - 6 j LYNNE ROGERSON 0 SR -q'gli -1, Ln. ,*' ° •s's! 0> , RESIDENCE .... OAK BAY ROAD • A 7 — 77 Eli) JEFFERSON COUNTY, WA '----A 6!91 - , • , _ r _ .1 ; Slope backfill away from foundation. Provide surface 11::iD MAR 2 8 2001 E 0 drains where necessary. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tightline Roof Drain (Do not connect to footing drain) Backfill n>r (See text for 6. requirements) ® e II=- Ili li A Vapor Retarder Nonwoven Geotextile z or Barrier Filter ° Washed Rock u- SLAB (7/8" min. size) _____.4 t A . ,d ,. „,'1-°,..•;"',f,(7.,„"-,. t,-- . l p,A 'r �oJ_ c..G �,C. c CGo.O't.r C'. ,',C O .o� G,0 o " -`'•"- --'1,C J o i c c GC n':,-;-,-,7;',016 'K,a » :k- r h 3 H T ''7 D '� . 7'°C' N e .- ' ' „ . r " 'i _ ititstilii i i" k t� 6" min. °"7°Ji_` III Free-Draining Gravel (if appropriate) 4" Perforated Hard PVC Pipe (Invert at least 6 inches below slab or crawl space. Slope to drain to appropriate outfall. Place holes downward.) NOTES: (1) In crawl spaces, provide an outlet drain to prevent buildup of water that bypasses the perimeter footing drains. (2) Refer to report text for additional drainage and waterproofing considerations. TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN GEOTECH 2137 Oak Bay Road -..4, CONSULTANTS,INC. Jefferson County, Washington i. • r Job No: Date: Scale: Plate: 00071 I June 2000 I Not to Scale 1 -.. A4441- 01 -JO SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT FILE SHEET Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 (800) 831-2678 PERMIT #: SEP01-00044 Date Received: 03/28/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD Revised Date: 05/31/2001 PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY PHONE: (425)643-9095 C/O STEVE KUNKEL 5427 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 SUBDIVISION: BLOCK: LOT: 9 PARCEL: 921182012 Section: 18 Township: 29N Range: 01 E INTERESTED PARTY: DESIGNER: TILLMAN ENGINEERING PHONE: (360)379-9661 PO BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: 280-GLENDON BIOFILTER TYPE OF WORK: NEW TYPE OF USE: RESA ADDITIONAL WORK: RED ASSIGNED TO: L ATKINS PARCEL TAGS: YES NO STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Plat Conditions Wetland Erosion Seismic Streams Flood Way Flood Plane Routing Date: F&W Landslide 5/31 f f1 Shoreline Aquifer Forest: Commercial Rural_ Proximity Type Amount Paid By Date Receipt Approved/Date New Alternative System $300.00 MAM 03/28/2001 38874 Redesign $55.00 MAM 05/30/2001 40179 Total: $355.00 • i:T_SEP_Application.rpt 11/22/19 a i 600.00' N 00 30'49" W , = -' '----t--__ -y- --•-•.'.— , ..yam.....,+ �/ �% 1 2 y mO r T.1 m`O'� N� mm / m O 1 m O r -0 N n tip 'o i F_ :-<". 0 cnm O y Y' . -< c0 \ 0 , ,/ ` y1 ,\ 1 . //f r , / / , :ii 1 fir. % r\\. ), / I ) �� ;r \. �� ' i 00t m I I/ [ Co / / ■ , ,J • r a _ -0ok 1 ( \ � - r1� i > I I a 1 '` 0 1 : '• /114/9 0 Z ( '- ^ . om `lr 'r ' , r 1 9g'`ZS x rn 7:_i 0 2 O am 0 r- r 2 0 O O Q 01 vi °n c, ST4 / N m o o_ w £ �\' 1 ° � „..„:.:_k..,,,4= v y N n FIR - SCALE: 1” = 100' s SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN TILLMAN ,! R ONS DATE a, N N FOR DR. MARC MAUNEY SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. I i 1 4 ! PARCEL NO. 921-182-012 41 ow Kw NO*"M°;' R s.c►+n.s-wM MI 1111 II 1110 111111IIIIIIIIIII 1111111111 1 1144418 43Z9A Jefferson Country WA MARC MAUNEY HOL 11.00 u U jaw I 0 JEFFERSON COUNTY AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: 1"� PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Department of Community hDevelopment Lr` , 01\ 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantor(s): Marc Mauney Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental enti within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this /8 day of June, 200 , by [grantor(s)] Marc Mauney, mailing address is 5427 118t Ave. S.E. Bell-vue Washington 98006 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall consti to a burden upon, and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described real property located Sec. 18 Twp. 29N R OlE Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 921182012 . Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement as well as execution of a waiver for a building and septic system located inside of a Geological Hazard Area as defined by Section 3.6 of the Jefferson County Un'fied Development Code, shall be granted by the Grantee a building and septic pe it as per RCW 19.27, the Uniform Building Code, and the Jefferson County Unifie u II 11 1 11 I 4441S;79 2eA Jefferson County. WA MARC MRUNEY HOLD 11.00 Development Code to allow for the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence on a portion of land that contains an Environmentally Sensitive Area. In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire(s) to install a septic system and construct a single- family residence. The property is situated in close proximity to a landslide hazard area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in building at close proximity to the landslide hazard area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees) that may at any time arise, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation, administrative code or County Ordinance. 11111111111111111111111 44481103 2BR Jefferson County, WA MARC MAUNEY HOLD 11.00 4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. III III 11111 I ( 444813 Page: Jettsrson County, WA MARC MAUNEY HOLD 11.00 THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written abov . GRANTORS •.•... .. 'S�� MARC MAUNEY /i /o, •;w d, • v,.,-,1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) •sc 1,..:-- it 14.*;s )ss. S,'•.' ••is%•.•.�� COUNTY OF t v► 6 ) `i^bb'H ,S'� I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Marc Mauney, signed this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. DATED this 181 day of�jj JII/i/E_ , 20 j nt name: l �,, A+�R Is�� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Washington, County of X10 — , residing at S } R,P . My commission expires: /0— 1 -0 O Approved s '7 - - efferson County Unified Development Code Administrator: 1 By: All ,� D ate: e4U I S 2-w/ Al Scalf Unified Development Code Administrator Approved as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney By: 1'• ilia C �u .-. Date: 67,3 1 0) Juelanne Dalze 1 1, County Prod uting Attorne y JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 DATE ISSUED: June 20, 2001 DATE EXPIRES: June 20, 2003 MLA NUMBER: MLA01-00140 PROJECT PLANNER: K RUSSELL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SHORELINE EXEMPTION: Stormwater Management System PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd, Port Hadlock, WA. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.5(c) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 3.) Evidence suggests that the bluff area related to the parcel in question is subject to erosion and mass wasting. Vigilant maintenance of the stormwater runoff tightline to the beach is important to avoid a negative contribution to bluff instability. 4.) Stormwater runoff tightline piping can be subject to weakening through ultraviolet radiation exposure and mechanical damage due to trees, rocks and debris. A more durable material for the tightline will provide greater defense against the elements. 5.) The applicant has requested approval to tightline all stormwater generated through the single family dwelling over the marine bluff. Section 3.6.5 requires that all stormwater be infiltrated onsite to the maximum extent practicable. The applicant has submitted the appropriate geotechnical documentation to justify tightlining over the marine shoreline. CONDITIONS: 1.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 2.) The applicant/owner and all future owners are responsible for maintaining and protecting the stormwater runoff tightline to the beach against damage due to normal wear, weather exposure, and/or trees, rocks and debris. If and when damage occurs to the tightline that renders it ineffective, the responsible party must execute the necessary repairs as soon as possible and no longer than 30 days. 3.) The stormwater runoff tightline piping must be composed of durable material that is resistant to weakening and damage due to time, weather exposure (including ultraviolet radiation), and impacts from trees, rocks and debris. The corrugated plastic material used for tightline construction in the past is no longer acceptable. More durable plastic or ultraviolet radiation-resistant flexible rubber material shall be required. 4.) The stormwater runoff tightline shall be designed and placed in order to minimize visual impacts to users of the beach and nearby waters. 5•) The applicant completed a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application Form (JARPA). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has determined that an HPA will not be required based upon the following Findings: P9` '3: • T 1. The pipe diameter is less than 6-inches 2. The pipe opening to the beach is kept to the base of the bluff. 3. No more than one existing log is moved 4. All of the work is done by hand with no vegetation removed or alteration to the beach or bank. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings, utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers, lakes, marine waters), or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at (206)526-6613,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503) 231-6121. Pursuant to RCW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see • D. Section 8.5.2. I 1 Mill\----UDC Administrator I r � I . SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT FILE SHEET Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 (800) 831-2678 PERMIT #: SEP01-00044 . Date Received: 03/28/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD Revised Date: PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY PHONE: (425)643-9095 C/O STEVE KUNKEL 5427 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 SUBDIVISION: BLOCK: LOT: 9 PARCEL: 921182012 Section: 18 Township: 29N Range: 01 E INTERESTED PARTY: DESIGNER: TILLMAN ENGINEERING PHONE: (360)379-9661 PO BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: 140-PRESSURIZED BED TYPE OF WORK: NEW TYPE OF USE: RESA ADDITIONAL WORK: NONE ASSIGNED TO: L FAY PARCEL TAGS: YES NO STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Plat Conditions Wetland Erosion Seismic Streams Flood Way Flood Plane Routing Date: ! J F&W Landslide 3/23 O ` '� Shoreline Aquifer Forest: Commercial Rural Proximity Type Amount Paid By Date Receipt Approved/Date New Alternative System $300.00 MAM 03/28/2001 38874 Total: $300.00 i:1F SEP Application.rpt 11/22/19 Y t ..._... Stt 05 t r--'' r N00'30'491V (600.00 �./ —^ / ^ , —! �.r '�— ^ -rte J C vl cn �� —� �A xo nmj _ _ 1 i ' t , \ ( 'V I i , , f ............ , z , r 0... ...... ., 7 ,,, ,, 1 , (0 ,...., , 1 • 40 1 \ I i I \ I / i ro.' \l'III:41110 : ii EN 1 j I I ,tip° - i 1, .� .r— j . '• - I D B� FS / ( 1 .r 1, , , _ ...,,, ...._ ..., ,..,.......... ,......_ _--- .., /,...„4. , . ..,....„,.,...„... , .......,..- _______, - . , , ,.. \\\ Ct 1 \ K- • - ..- / S f 3.y y cn / i" i 1 II z / _...„- - G ifa C 47 r ' Z c)m F r a x...t 4 * t _ ...........NO .,., rf 41...-1 Z� . .. C.-� C� �� /� c> Q SCALE: 1" = 100 I U r t GWill J I e i, SEPTIC, SYSTEM DESIGN ��ILLITIRN , �� \BY 14 N FOR MARC MAUNEY SITE PLAN ENGINEERING. INC. to i NI a,a `1 J` PARCEL NO. 921-182-012IJ \ BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD01-00179 Received Date: 3/28/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK, 98339 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY PHONE: (206)722-6829 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 9 PARCEL NUMBER: 921182012 Section: 18 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: STEVE KUNKEL MASTER BUILDERS IN PHONE: (425)643-9095 5427 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006-3326 Contractor's License STEVEKM108C7 Expires 11/11/2001 ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER : PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMO TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP DEM MAIN: VALUATION ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: CODE EDITION: 1997 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: # OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: DECK: SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: PARCEL TAGS: YES NO BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Exist: Exist: Wetland Erosion Prop: Prop: Seismic Streams Total: Total: Flood Way Floodplain F&W Landslide Routing Date: v7_c(1 0/ p(�(� Shoreline Aquifer �`�� Forest: Commercial Rural Proximit Flat Uoriditions Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/uate Permit $48.00 MAM 03/28/01 38831 State Building Code $4.50 MAM 03/28/01 38831 Total: $52.50 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD01-00179 Received Date: 3/28/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK, 98339 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY PHONE: (206)722-6829 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 9 PARCEL NUMBER: 921182012 Section: 18 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: STEVE KUNKEL MASTER BUILDERS IN PHONE: (425)643-9095 5427 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006-3326 Contractor's License STEVEKM108C7 Expires 11/11/2001 ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER : PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DEMO TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP DEM MAIN: VALUATION ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: CODE EDITION: 1997 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: # OF STORIES: OTHER: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: DECK: SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: PARCEL TAGS: YES NO BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Exist: Exist: Wetland Erosion Prop: Prop: Seismic Streams Total: Total: Flood Way Floodplain F&W Landslide Routing Date: V7_0(/ F(2Q, Shoreline Aquifer � �J Forest: Commercial Rural Nroximity I'Iat Conditions Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $48.00 MAM 03/28/01 38831 State Building Code $4.50 MAM 03/28/01 38831 Total: $52.50 • PROPERTY LINE ______ __ --..-----—-_ i___. . _______ ... ,11 L't .4 ' . 1 I1 Sp t1 ii 0 1 �i------------ — — — fit r 1 I ., 1i I 3 zrD z Omr Dz' A g 1i! 1 C1nD Q �+ P� � � $ ^' rtirmC7 AmU ' 70 m r A i Jill – �:�, m rWZ ; Uri m D AD. ° 6N ••0 OX ,C7m I A v I � 1 Zc �, -• rn � m DGl G cn •N m m � zZ m om r �J m co N-I z �l ,,° J r d X --1 i 'r. � 0 c t fd r r -'-14-."....- r cn •O p ir ' - Ir``1'•` D • il I r j� `;r�i / � } ' ' r0 D I Di i f p ml 1 I , !( s ` , 1 N A , 1 1 i ; lam.' f ry i 1 -< / : I i II /:-..,..:.-........,..,__\) .:\17, ......,,,..,... r / i . liiiiiiimi, . '71''''''',,,,,,„,,,,,,_ _ 1 .- i Ir!:' may _ --� ; Y I m �i Cl �; to N b �+. r M■ i i m'n I I J { ?� 1 i fe um__ :: ,;\1;';' o ter` .` 1 2 (A 1 rrr ICI 0 61 ■ � . . — r i , f Y \�` -`ice.- 3N�� } N r6 00 M --/ A N 6 / to � r r- ,.,- _ / U p ./- ) c 1 -0 X OXGAl OX OX O ��to UlN 03D t11N ( - m r r, (pd mz mz td D < v, 0 ! ._ CO o 10 ` ,....-(3 z E--I. n, z o O P, A rn Z `J 0 -< r r> 7 r- fi e r BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD01-00180 Received Date: 3/28/2001 SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK, 98339 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY PHONE: (206)722-6829 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 SUBDIVISION: Block: 1 Lot: 9 PARCEL NUMBER: 921182012 Section: 18 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: STEVE KUNKEL MASTER BUILDERS IN PHONE: (425)643-9095 5427 118TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006-3326 Contractor's License STEVEKM108C7 Expires 11/11/2001 ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER : PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,400 VALUATION 195,483.00 ADD'L: 1,430 HEAT TYPE: PRO CODE EDITION: 1997 HEAT BASE: 550 HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: # OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: 680 SETBACK: 275 DECK: 160 BANK HEIGHT: 40 SEWAGE DISPOSAL: CON WATER SYSTEM: PWELL PARCEL TAGS: YES NO BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Exist: Exist: Wetland Erosion Prop: 4 Prop: 5 Seismic Streams Total: 4 Total: 5 Flood Way Floodplain F&W Landslide Routing Date: [2.C.1 / ( Pp R Shorelne C Aquifer "�J Forest i ommercial Rural Proximity F�Iat Lo d ions Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved,Da e Permit $1,531.35 MAM 03/28/01 38831 Plan Check $459.41 MAM 03/28/01 38831 State Building Code $4.50 MAM 03/28/01 38831 Potable Water Application $30.00 MAM 03/28/01 38831 Total: $2,025.26 JWS pml MAR 2 8 2001 DEPT OfJCOh1MUNiTY DEVELOPMENT 1-0 COVPAG CALCULA1ION LOT AREA 442,892 S.F. 1. EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AREA 22,150 SF. 2. EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1,550 SF. 3. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 30,300 SF. 6.5 % LOT AREA 4. EXISTING DRIVEWAY AREA TO SE REMOVED: - 3,500 SF. -' 5. EXISTING BUILDING ROOF AREA TO 9635 SF. REDUCTION BE REMOVED: - 6,135 SF. 6. NEW DRIVEWAY AREA TO BE CONSTRUCTED: + 4,465 SF. 1. NEW BUILDING ROOF AREA TO -6,555 SF. PROPOSED BE CONSTRUCTED: + 2,090 S.F. J 5. REVISED LOT COVERAGE: 21,220 5F. 6.1 % LOT AREA (EXISTING TO REMAIN + PROPOSED) 9. NET DIFFERENCE: - 3,050 SF. DECREASE OF LOT COVERAGE (EXISTING VS PROPOSED) 511 I7MNA6 NOM5: 1. EXISTING ROOF DRAINS DISPERSED AT GRADE NO SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON SITE. 2. NEW STRUCTURE ROOF DRAINS SHALL SE COLLECTED AT BUILDING PERIMETER AND DIVERTED THROUGH 4"-6" TIGHTLINE TO SUBSURFACE DRYWELL AREAS AS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. 3. DRYWELL: 101x101x2' DEPTH MIN., INSTALL (5) 10' LENGTHS OF 4" DIAM. SEPTIC DRAINFIELD PERFORATED LINE, BED INTO WASHED ROCK W/ 12" DEPTH BELOW AND ABOVE PIPE. COVER ROCK W/ FABRIC PRIOR TO SACKFILL, COVER ROCK W/ 12" OF TOP SOIL. DRYWELL AT (2) LOCATIONS, SEE SITE PLAN. m 37 —I )E )E co -b 0) Co —I Cg -b X —I —I CD 0) 0) —- -- 0) -C1 CO 0) X — Q C-7 r-t- X 0) C) -5 -O CO O — -O -5 -5 C) 0) O C CL CD CO (-7 CD = = CD C) —- CD CC= CD CD 37 CD 01 r+ C=) CD — = 7K' C -5 E -3 - CD Z Cl) O = 1 CC N CD C-7 O I=1 a) — -5 CL O O O —I O O ^J N O '� CO = CD 37 N C CO Z CD CO N O O Q --I. -. CO O N O r+ — W te/ C/) co = CD r - 37 —1 Cl) GD m OD 37 CD -0 C C 37 —' CD 37 N =I = 0) CO Z x OD 0 --I — CD -CI CD m —I I— CD -I -< co —I CD Zo I— C ) = rn x - N CL m CD m 37 37 —I CC) 37 = Co C m = N r- c=1 c-3, Z —I a =3 CO 37 m v 37 73 -� N co = 0 -< o — x c-, m — - - - 37 II 0 37 -� O 37 co co -O m m I— N m : CD 37 CO m O 70 CL CO c CD -Is- —I rn N -< = = —- CC) CO H O 3 I Z 37 C3 - 0 37 C7 I— CO O — O 3 0) —1 E N = O C = m co C CL _ CD r+ 0 C CL CO CD CD O - O -H -H C-3 ° J J N CJ-I 0 0 nfll Cl Z „" O m C7 C7 Cr 37 o T SCE O CO = c - - rn I CM CC= CL r-+ o cn O rn z o ti inn] I� C 0 C7 O --n W I --I Z CO Cn r+ C3.- =O CL o 0 0 = G) -� _ O C) O m o co m Co -J N — CD r CD O o 2 N O H O J CD _ - 1 C L — -n _ C.O C co co i—i_Amk ��cerli c 6 JEFFERSON COUNTY ti V DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D 2 (r� Iz O n� 2 4- ''' 621 Sheridan Street •• Port Townsend •• Washington 98368 l5 l� Il5 V l5 1SF Ne 360/3794450 • 800/831-2678 • 360/379-4451 Fax MAR '2 8 2001 STORMWATER CALCUI IFFFFRFntd rnnniry PA i12-C.E,L TA- G OPMENT Pursuant to Unified Development Code section 6.7, all new developm� •ds and minimum requirements set by the Washington Department of Ecology : d Basin (SMM). For specific information regarding the storm water minimu ' I ally, the minimum requirements and thresholds for developing specific plans area U�1S T a �I1? So I L S • Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan-Generale or adds less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area; (2)the construc :cessory dwelling units, or duplexes creating or adding more than 3,00( and (3) land-disturbing activities of 10,000 sq/ft or more but less than or • Large Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (prepareo ad for all development that includes: (1) the creation or addition of 5,0C isturbing activities of one acre or more. If this is required you should cor • Permanent Stormwater Quality Control Plan -Generally, th adds less than 5,000 sq/ft of impervious surface that covers more than 51 )or more sq/ft of impervious surface and land disturbing activities of less • Stormwater Site Plan - Generally, this is required for all de ye Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; and (2) redevelopment c when the specific conditions contained in UDC section 6.7.5(b)apply. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE To P tc,,.toot9 NEW EXISTING Structures (all roof area) Z/o 1 td sq/ft Structures (all roof area) —7/5W sq/ft -(pr3 Driveway 4, 425' sq/ft Driveway tii!7Sa sq/ft -3/5-00 Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Concrete Patios sq/ft Concrete Patios sq/ft Decks [ (p 0 sq/ft Decks sq/ft Other sq/ft Other yam, sq/ft , Total New 4 7 I sq/ft Total Existing iv7. 0 sq/ft (i0s —1 4gs- TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* Z 7f,3 sq/ftZ�/ ,S 4vcririci *This amount will be used to check total lot coverage To ge 4/01 0 Please also indicate the amount of land disturbing activity, in addition to the creation of impervious surface, that will take place: LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY Drainfield area cleared sq/ft Well, Structures, Utilities, etc. /.10610 10-Q 4D sq/ft Driveway 4,46 sq/ft Other (Ml%117e /o) (0t 000 sq/ft Total Land Disturbance OP 95 1 sq/ft PROPERTY LINE • 11 'N •i f.4 _ If 10v! rj ZrD DII A 1 D -I zr { tn i rn { Ili A00 0 D I i A ° d6 A � rnU � � � 1O rA 0z m 1 A@ m � 00 - : A rn • . 1 u04' rw c m 1 x tpi. A I ADr qt (N .u ° 0x ° I z N r 1 � (lD � 6 A -' I m •tnO r � N 6 G; H Z P D � tM mr , - _ D H zzd VNI 1 -,. 1 { 1 • ' 1L`1` r ON I 1 I- ...I i _•--- ' /. ,\„••..,` � N rn 1 ° 0 b I A 3A Z O 1 ' � ,:r. m O -0 ' 1 f( `, ` \.,, is rn -<1 /( i' •: ;----- ; _- +.^..ms 3 C7 , $ 1 ; ; ••y, ' N. Ads J -- :� I m i i ? O _ I1 mz -( _ ,I ° � AAD •1 aY�Z\ „ ✓ , ` _.�` I A u - A O cn �. @�\�� l9 < / - r N � i ;♦ % 1 -� - n o m r \\����� ,,,,--J i i-- tai y�� iTil C-1. ..,...._,.... ,`_ V _.- -/ . O n X01 i �O 1 o A I) x Ox 0 ox O °� 0 A �, � z O � Z 6 td D m -< D3 ° m E ° m ims■— Z 1> g tilt 0 m D m m D D `= -0 0 m c -1 tt,.,,,''0 •Z 5 O Uuu 0 Cu 0 D f 0 ti om m A - O O O Km 0 NInlli' d 0 C3 3 x --12Cn1 ,01N 1 J 3 2001 JEFFERSON COUNTY AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 • HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantor(s): Marc Mauney Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this day of June, 2001, by [grantor(s)] Marc Mauney, mailing address is 5427 .118th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Washington 98006 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall constitute a burden upon, and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described real property located Sec. 18 Twp. 29N R 01E Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 921182012 . Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement as well a. execution of a waiver for a building and septic system located inside of a Geological Hazard Area as defined by Section 3.6 of the Jefferson County U ified Development Code, shall be granted by the Grantee a building and septic pe it as per RCW 19.27, the Uniform Building Code, and the Jefferson County Unifies Development Code to allow for the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence on a portion of land that contains an Environmentally Sensitive Area. In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire(s) to install a septic system and construct a single- family residence. The property is situated in close proximity to a landslide hazard area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in building at close proximity to the landslide hazard area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees) that may at any time arise, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation, administrative code or County Ordinance. /4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written ab ve. GRANTORS MARC MAUNEY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Marc M uney1 signed this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowle ged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therei . DATED this day of , 20_ Print name: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, County of , residing at . My commission expires: 7 Approved be) - - efferson County Unified Development Code Administrator: ,I c e{ By: -' Date: 'c.'rue I ZCc/ Al Scalf Unified Development Code Administrator Approved as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney By: O11 Aa.. 1 .L Date: 6 / 3 0 g Juelanne Dalzell, County Pro-.0 uting Attorney ( l KIVLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER TILLMAN KIVLEY OAK BAY ROAD/P.O.BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON 98339 ENGINEERING, INC. 360-379-9661 360-379-0150 FAX C E 11 'V Et MAY - 7 1 May 7, 2001 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kevin Russell, Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Subject Stormwater Management Report, Marc Mauney Property,2133 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339,PID#9211820i2 Dear Mr. Russell: Please find, attached, a Master Land Use Application, DARPA, drawings, supporting documents and calculations for a stormwater management system for the Marc Mauney property at 2133 Oak Bay Road in Jefferson County, WA. The stormwater management system is required as the result of 6555 sf of new impervious surface that will result from the construction of a new dwelling and related driveways on the subject property. Please contact me at 379-9661 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, / " 'I r C David F. Bobanick Tillman Engineering, Inc. copy: Dr. Marc Mauney Jon Simpson Steve Kunkel File • /I 58990 S-B-o I 4,AISOil cCe. JEFFERSON COUNTY V� icon c I a g • � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4' 621 Sheridan Street 0 Port Townsend 0 Washington 98368 IECEDWE -` 4INCI ' 360/379-4450 0 800/831-2678 0 360/379-4451 Fax MAY - 72C Master Land Use Permit Application Form JEFFERSON C.UNTY DEPT. OF COMMuNI I Y DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY INFORMATION Q Tax Parcel Number: 921182012 Subdivision Name: Lot Number: Property Size: 9.7 acres Existing Use of Residential Property: Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 2133 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock,Wa. 98339 Property is located on the East side of Oak Bay Road, approximately 2.1 miles South of the intersection of Oak Bay Road and Irondale Road in Port Hadlock. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant: Dr. Marc Mauney Telephone: (206)722-6829 Address: 3821 Cascadia Ave S. City: Seattle State: WA Zip Code: 98188 Name of Authorized Agent(if Ryan Tillman, PE Telephone: (360) 379-9661 applicable): Address: PO Box 1375 City: Port Hadlock State: WA Zip Code: 98339 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY(include separate sheets as necessary) Construct a Stormwater Management System to handle additional stormwater created by 6555 SF of new impervious surface to meet Jeffreson County Permitting requirements.The new impervious surface will result from construction of a new home and related driveways on the subject property. PERMITS REQUESTED FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY Please check with Permit Center personnel before completing this section and refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements. An asterisk (*) indicates that a supplemental application or questionnaire is required. Type I Permits Refer to: Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System (EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC Building/Demolition Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 Allowed "Yes" Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ✓ Stormwater Management* UDC Section 6.7 Road Access* UDC Section 6.8 Boundary Line Adjustment* UDC Section 7.2 Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 Sign Permit* UDC Section 6.15 Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ✓ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 Temporary Use(based on use may be Type II or Type III)* UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type II Permits Refer to: Discretionary"D" or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2 and Table 3-1 Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 Short Plat, Preliminary and Final* UDC Section 7.3 Binding Site Plan* UDC Section 7.5 MASTER LAND USE PERMR.DOC REV.05/02/01 i ' MaY, 3 . 20019: 02AM St , Francis Lab No. 4231 P . 212 421003 • Conditional(Administrative)"C(a)" Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 Conditional (Diseretionary)'C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit ReviewProcess-bete Tsfnedby-Admmietratvr) Variance, Minor' UDC Section 8.9 Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 08-0712-Ve(UDC Appendix C) Shoreline Substantial Development{Primary Uee) UDC Section 5 Forest Practices ActRReleese of 51x-Tear Moratorium for Single-- UDC Section 4 16.5(c) Family Residence Temporary Use' UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type III Permits Conditional'V Use UDC Section 8.8 Long Plat. Preliminary' UDC Section 7.4 Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3,6.13 (must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments' underlying lend division application) Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) Variance, Major UDC Section 8.9 Reasonable Economic Use Variance' UDC Section 3.6.4(h) Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix.0 Shoreline Management Substantial Development, Secondary Use UDC Section 6 Shoreline Management Conditional Use" UDC Section 5 p❑ 2 Shoreline Management Variance" UDC Section 5 �YJ 5 Tyne IV Perm Its Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.13 MAY - 7 2001 Type V Permits Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 JEFFERSON COUNTY Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District UDC Section 8 DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Map Amendment' Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment' UDC Section 5 • er Local,State or Federal Permits Please (dent an other local state or federal •ermits =•irked for this •roposal, If known: JARPA Ae,u.owLEoceMENrs By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the Information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. 1 also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge end consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omleelon of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, Indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result Of of In consequence of the granting of this permit I further agree to provide access end fight of entry to Jefferson County and Its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections_ This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable 'awe and regulations, Access a right of ntry to the applicant's property shall be reeuested end shall occur only during regular business hours- (APPLICANT OR*UTeoe2EO Nteeleseer siceaeuee) (DATE) i hereby designate Ryan Tillman to act as my agent in matters related to this application for perm -). —Ade _- � o f (APPLICANT SiGNATURC) (DATE) The action or actiona Applicant will undertake as a result of the Issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more tnreatened or endangered species and could load to a potential'take'of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the'Endangered Species Act or'ESA.' Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will tie undertaken because this permit has been ieeued will not violate the ESA. Any individual, group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of en endangered species regarding your action(e)oven if you are In compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds Individual and non"transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. Appllc t rhes reed this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. 0 adopt NT OR AUTHOR=ZED REPRESS NE sic eeTURE) (DATE) 244 CTGp I Wan i l l DCD"If rot Ppv MMSX1'1 Conditional (Administrative)"C(a)" Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 Conditional (Discretionary)"C(d)" Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8(Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) Variance, Minor* UDC Section 8.9 • Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence Temporary Use UDC Sections 4.38 and 4.39 Type III Permits Conditional"C" Use UDC Section 8.8 Long Plat, Preliminary* UDC Section 7.4 Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13 (must be in conjunction with an (PRRD) and Major Amendments* underlying land division application) Plat Vacation/Alteration UDC Section 7.1.3(d) Variance, Major* UDC Section 8.9 Reasonable Economic Use Variance* UDC Section 3.6.4(h) Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C Shoreline Management Substantial Development, Secondary Use* UDC Section 5 Shoreline Management Conditional Use* UDC Section 5 Shoreline Management Variance* UDC Section 5 2 Type IV Permits D l� E u V LE T Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 • PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.13 MAY Type V Permits Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District UDC Section 9 JEFFERSON COUNTY Map Amendment* DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment* UDC Section 5 Other Local, State or Federal Permits / Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: JARPA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate_Ryan Tillman to act as my agent in matters related to this application for permit(s). (APPLICANT SIGNATURE) (DATE) The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential "take" of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act" or "ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual, group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s) even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code The Applicant acknowledges that he, she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. (APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.05/02/01 1 E c 15 / v EA�1CY USE ONLY J Date Received _ Agency!Reference Circulated by: ', .J (local govt or agency) JOINT AQUATFsR'ES,AURCES F ERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) DEPT. OF COMMUNITY E.',EVEL4045Wini WashingtonState) Id PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 75.20.350. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form, and the (Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS—You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working da Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) El Local Government for shoreline: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance O Exemption ❑ Revision ❑ Floodplain Management ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance ❑ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) ❑ Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permits(to Regional office-Federal Permit Unit) ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification ❑ Corps of Engineers for ❑ Section 404 ❑ Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for Section 9 Bridge Permit ❑ US Fish&Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service for Endangered Species Act(ESA)Consultation SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications. 1.APPLICANT Dr.Marc Mauney MAILING ADDRESS 3821 Cascadia Ave. South Seattle,WA 98188 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 253-591-6713 206-722-6829 If an agent Is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT Ryan Tillman, PE MAILING ADDRESS PO Box 1375 Port Hadlock,WA 98365 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 360-437-0686 tillengr @olypen.com 3.RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY. O OWNER ❑PURCHASER ❑LESSEE ❑OTHER 4.NAME,ADDRESS,AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S),IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT: 5 LOCATION(STREET ADDRESS,INCLUDING CITY,COUNTY AND ZIP CODE,WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCUR) 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Jefferson County LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION(CITY OR COUNTY)Jefferson County TRIBUTARY OF WRIA# Y.SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE GOVERNMENT LOT SHORELINE DESIGNATION NW 18 29N 01E Natural Rural Conservancy LATITUDE&LONGITUDE ZONING DESIGNATION IF KNOWN: Rural Residential RR 1-5 TAX PARCEL NO: DNR STREAM TYPE,IF KNOWN 921182012 JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version,360/407-7037 Page 1 of 4 8.DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY,AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY. IF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACT VID A DY-GOMPLFT LU THIS PROPERTY,INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION. 1I, Current use of property is residential.No proposed activity has been completed. ryrl AY JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP" ENT IS THE PROPERTY AGRICULTURAL LAND? 0 YES ®NO ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT? D YES IX!NO 7a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND/OR FILL WORK FOR THE PROJECT THAT YOU WANT TO BUILD THAT NEEDS AQUATIC PERMITS: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE,INCLUDING TYPES OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. IF APPLYING FOR A SHORELINE PERMIT,DESCRIBE ALL WORK WITHIN AND BEYOND 200 FEET OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. No work will be done water ward of Ordinary High Water with this project.Work within 200 feet of Ordinary High Water will consist of stormwater conveyance facilities for 6555 SF of new impervious surface.Work outside the 200 ft limit will consist of new home and driveway construction and related stormwater and septic system construction. 7b. DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND WHY YOU WANT OR NEED TO PERFORM IT AT THE SITE. PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE DESIGN. The proposed work consists of construction of a new residence.The location of the new home was influenced by a geotechnical report that was done on the property. 7c. DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE,WATER QUALITY,WATER SUPPLY, RECREATION,and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID,MINIMIZE,AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS,AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION OF FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. The project will have no effect on the water body.Stormwater will be treated utilizing current Best Management Practice and will be deposited land ward of Ordinary High Water. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: SEE SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE,BUT THESE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X If INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAY BE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 8.WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES? D YES El NO PROPOSED STARTING DATE: Summer 2001 ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY'. 6 months 9.CHECK IF ANY STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED: ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAL WATERS;AND/OR OWATERWARD OF MEAN HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS • 10.WILL FILL MATERIAL(ROCK,FILL,BULKHEAD,OR OTHER MATERIAL)BE PLACED' • ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS? IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) /AREA (ACRES) ❑WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAL WATERS? IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) AREA (ACRES) JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version,360/407-7037 Page 2 of 4 ECElw 11.WILL MATERIAL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS? F .YES O NO IF A IMP — U MAY - 7 2001 V A. IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES: B. HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. C YES 0 NO C. HAS AWETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. JEFFERSON COUNTY p YES 0 NO OF COMMUNITY DEVELOpMENT D. TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAL(E.G.,SAND,ETC.)'. E. MATERIAL SOURCE: F. LIST ALL SOIL SERIES(TYPE OF SOIL)LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE,&INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTY'S LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS.SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(NRCS): 12.WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? 0 YES !ENO IF YES,IMPACTED AREA IS_ACRES. 13.WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS? 0 YES CM NO IF YES: A. VOLUME: (CUBIC YARDS)/AREA (ACRES) B. COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED: C. DISPOSAL SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAL: D. METHOD OF DREDGING: 14.HAS THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)BEEN COMPLETED? ❑YES ®NO SEPA LEAD AGENCY: SEPA DECISION: DNS,MDNS,EIS.ADOPTION,EXEMPTION DECISION DATE(END OF PERIOD): SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION 15.LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS,APPROVALS,OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTION,DISCHARGES,OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION(I.E.,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,HEALTH DISTRICT APPROVAL,BUILDING PERMIT,SEPA REVIEW,FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE(FERC),FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION,ETC.) ALSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE ALL EXISTING WORK ON DRAWINGS. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETED? NO. 16.HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN? ❑YES I(NO IF YES,EXPLAIN: SECTION B-Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only: 17 TOTAL COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT.INCLUDING MATERIALS,LABOR,MACHINE RENTALS,ETC. 18.LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION: 19.FOR CORPS,COAST GUARD,AND DNR PERMITS,PROVIDE NAMES,ADDRESSES,AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES,ETC.. PLEASE NOTE: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE—CONSULT YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER • JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version,360/407-7037 Page 3 of 4 SECTION C-This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application 20.APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE,COMPLETE,AND ACCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE.THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED, IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WORK. I AGREE TO START WORK ONLY AFTER ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. SIGNATURE OF APPLIC OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE l I HEREBY SIGNATE ((( TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S), I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR) DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U S C§1001 provides that: Whoever,in any manner within the Jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike, material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any') B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view: I C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions. .11ECE [1 ?,/ EB MAY - 7 JEFFERSON CCUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version, 360/407-7037 Page 4 of 4 PROPOSED RESIDENCE E C E g V E DR. MARC MAUNEY I 2133 OAK BAY ROAD i PORT IIADLOCK,WA 98339 _ MAY u STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT JEFFERSON C I U NTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The subject project involves the construction of a new Single Family Residence with related drivewa S. septic system, septic conveyance and drainfields on the 9.7 Acre(442,892 SF)parcel. The terrain on the parcel is mountainous with the slope facing East toward Oak Bay of the Puget Sound. A relatively fl:t bench separates them mountainous slope from a bluff of 25-40 ft.that drops to the beach of Oak Bay. The bluff area is classed as a Type 4 Landslide Hazard in the Jefferson County Critical Areas listings. The predominant soil on the site,according to the Jefferson County Soil Survey,is Tukey Gravelly Loam (TuD)with Clallam Gravelly Sandy Loam(CmD)at the higher, Western edge of the site and Hoypus Gravelly Sandy Loam(HvC)near the bluff on the Eastern edge of the property. The Tukey and Clallam Series soils exhibit a low permeability, cemented layer from 24"to 36"below the surface. Test pits were dug on-site which confirmed the compacted nature of the sub-soil. A geotechnical report, attached, confirms the low permeability of the soils based on observations of test pits on-site. Total new impervious area created as a result of this project will be 6555 SF. Existing impervious areas on the site from buildings,driveways and parking total 30,300 SF but 9635 SF will be eliminated for a net of 20,665 SF of existing impervious surfaces. The total impervious surface when the project is completed will be 27,220 SF or 6.1%of the lot area. A Stormwater Management plan has been developed to handle the drainage from the new impervious surfaces. Anticipated stormwater flows from the new impervious surfaces were calculated by methods recommended in the Puget Sound Surface Water Design Manual for various storms.Flow rates are listed in the following table: STORM EVENT PEAK FLOW(cfs) 2 yr. 24 hr 0.06 10 yr. 24 hr 0.08 100 yr. 24 hr. 0.12 Infiltration of the stormwater on-site and upland off-site were considered and rejected since placing additional stormwater,although relatively slight, into the surrounding soils would tend to exacerbate current,unstable conditions at the bluff. The attached Geotechnical report speaks to that issue and strongly recommends a tightline of the stormwater to the base of the Bluff along Oak Bay as the most effective way of handling the stormwater created by the new impervious surfaces that are associated 'th this project. A stormwater management system has been designed that captures the stormwater from the 6550 SF f new impervious surface and conveys it over the bluff to a point land ward of Ordinary High Water. T e system was designed to easily accommodate the anticipated flows for the 100 year storm event. Provis ons have been incorporated into the system which will allow for collection of debris and other flotable materials at an inlet box that will be located more than 200 ft back from the bluff. The portion over the bluff can easily be replaced,if necessary,with minimal disturbance to the face of the bluff. Although flows are anticipated to be relatively small,an energy dissipation system,consisting of small rocks,will be placed behind some large beach logs to minimize any erosive effects of stormwater runoff on the beach. All construction activity will be land ward of Ordinary High Water. 1 R ECEWE MAv - ; Stormwater Calculations JEFFERSON COUNTY 'lCnr fir CQ....y ir, Fri Qn&CiT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW - EXISTING Structures (all roof area) 2090 sq/ft Structures(all roof area) 1415 sq/ft Driveway 4465 sq/ft Driveway 19250 sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Other sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New 6555 sq/ft _ Total Existing 20,665 sq/ft TOTAL NEW+ TOTAL EXISTING* 27,220 sq/ft (6.1%) *This amount will be used to check total lot coverage Please also indicate the amount of land disturbing activity, in addition to the creation of impervious surface, that will take place: LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY Drainfield area cleared 2580 sq/ft Well, Structures, Utilities, etc. 4318 sq/ft Driveway sq/ft Other sq/ft Total Land Disturbance 6898 sq/ft 2 SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 0 5 lb E LI 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM } . 3 - STORM DATA FILE 1.1 lli SPECIFY STORM OPTION: DEPT. DFJEFFERS° TCOUNTYOPMENT 1 S.C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP (INCHES) 2 , 24, 1. 5 ******************** S. C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1. 50" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 158 , . 01, 78 , 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC (MINUTES) A CN A CN . 2 . 2 98. 0 . 0 78 . 0 5. 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 06 7 . 67 705 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: �mm2 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C. S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 10, 24 , 2 . 0 ******************** S.C. S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN (PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 15, 98 , . 01, 78 , 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: C R OWE AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 2 . 2 98 . 0 . 0 78. 0 5. 0 ,. MAY -17 ' PEAK-Q (CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) JEFFERS�NCOUNTY 08 7 . 67 983 DEPT. OF COMMU ITY DEVELOPMENT ENTER [d: ] [path] filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: C:mm25 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP n STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-1A 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 100, 24 , .0. 0 S.C. S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR) , DURATION(HOUR) , PRECIP(INCHES) 100, 24 , 3 . 0 ******************** S.C. S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3 . 00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 . 15, 98, . 01, 78 , 5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN . 2 . 2 98 . 0 . 0 78 . 0 5 . 0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) . 12 7 . 67 1548 ENTER [d: ] [path] filename[ .ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: ffimfm100 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP p HYDROGRAPH DATA PRINT-OUT: T(HRS) Q(CFS) T(HRS) Q (CFS) T(HRS) Q(CFS) T(HRS) Q (CFS) . 00 . 00 6. 33 . 02 12 . 67 . 02 19. 00 . 01 . 17 . 00 6. 50 . 02 12 .83 . 02 19 . 17 . 01 . 33 . 00 6 . 67 . 03 13 . 00 . 02 19 . 33 . 01 x .50 . 00 6.83 . 04 13 . 17 . 02 19 . 50 . 01 . 67 . 00 7 . 00 . 04 13 . 33 . 02 19 . 67 . 01 .83 . 00 7 . 17 . 04 13 . 50 . 02 19 . 83 . 01 1. 00 . 00 7 . 33 . 05 13 . 67 . 02 20. 00 . 01 1. 17 . 00 7 . 50 . 07 13 . 83 . • - --2-G-.1 . 61 1. 33 . 00 7 . 67 . 12 14 . 00 - 42%, IE C *,43 ii 1. 50 . 00 7 . 83 . 11 14 . 17 . 02J 2 -7 o1 1. 67 . 01 8 . 00 . 06 14 . 33 . o, 20. 67 . 11 1. 83 . 01 8 . 17 . 04 14 . 50 • a' ' MAY 20: 83 61 2 . 00 . 01 8 . 33 . 04 14 . 67 . 11 21. 00 . i1 2 . 17 . 01 8 . 50 . 04 14 . 83 . 11 21 ,17 . 11 2 . 33 . 01 8 . 67 . 03 15. 00 . 1 JEFFEF "! NTY dl +EPT. OFCOMP i EVEIOPMEN? 2 . 50 . 01 8.83 . 02 15. 17 . 1 • 01 2 . 67 . 01 9 . 00 . 02 15. 33 . 01 21. 67 . 01 2 . 83 . 01 9. 17 . 02 15 . 50 . 01 21. 83 . 01 3 . 00 . 01 9 . 33 . 02 15. 67 . 01 22 . 00 . 01 3 . 17 . 01 9 . 50 . 02 15.83 . 01 22 . 17 . 01 3 . 33 . 01 9 . 67 . 02 16. 00 . 01 22 . 33 . 01 3 . 50 . 01 9 . 83 . 02 16. 17 . 01 22 . 50 . 01 3 . 67 . 01 10. 00 . 02 16. 33 . 01 22 . 67 . 01 3 .83 . 02 10. 17 . 02 16. 50 . 01 22 . 83 . 01 4 . 00 . 02 10. 33 . 02 16. 67 . 01 23 . 00 . 01 4 . 17 . 02 10. 50 . 02 16.83 . 01 23 . 17 . 01 4 . 33 . 02 10. 67 . 02 17 . 00 . 01 23 . 33 . 01 4 . 50 . 02 10. 83 . 02 17 . 17 . 01 23 . 50 . 01 4. 67 . 02 11 . 00 . 02 17 . 33 . 01 23 . 67 . 01 4 . 83 . 02 11. 17 . 02 17 . 50 . 01 23 .83 . 01 5. 00 . 02 11. 33 . 02 17 . 67 . 01 24 . 00 . 01 5. 17 . 02 11. 50 . 02 17 . 83 . 01 24 . 17 . 00 5. 33 . 02 11. 67 . 02 18 . 00 . 01 24 . 33 . 00 5. 50 . 02 11. 83 . 02 18. 17 . 01 24 . 50 . 00 5 . 67 . 02 12 . 00 . 02 18 . 33 . 01 24 . 67 . 00 5. 83 . 02 12 . 17 . 02 18. 50 . 01 24 . 83 . 00 6. 00 . 02 12 . 33 . 02 18 . 67 . 01 25. 00 . 00 6. 17 . 02 12 . 50 . 02 18 . 83 . 01 25. 17 . 00 SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP P HYDROGRAPH DATA PRINT-OUT: T(HRS) Q(CFS) T(HRS) Q(CFS) T(HRS) Q (CFS) T(HRS) Q(CFS) . 00 . 00 6. 33 . 02 12 . 67 . 02 19 . 00 . 01 . 17 . 00 6. 50 . 02 12 . 83 . 02 19 . 17 . 01 . 33 . 00 6 . 67 . 03 13 . 00 . 02 19 . 33 . 01 . 50 . 00 6.83 . 04 13 . 17 . 02 19 . 50 . 01 . 67 . 00 7 . 00 . 04 13 . 33 . 02 19 . 67 . 01 . 83 . 00 7 . 17 . 04 13 . 50 . 02 19 .83 . 01 1. 00 . 00 7 . 33 . 05 13 . 67 . 02 20. 00 . 01 1. 17 . 00 7 . 50 . 07 13 .83 . 02 20. 17 . 01 1. 33 . 00 7 . 67 . 12 14 . 00 . 02 20. 33 . 01 1. 50 . 00 7 . 83 . 11 14 . 17 . 02 20. 50 . 01 1. 67 . 01 8. 00 . 06 14 . 33 . 02 20. 67 . 01 1.83 . 01 8 . 17 . 04 14 . 50 . 02 20. 83 . 01 2 . 00 . 01 8 . 33 . 04 14 . 67 . 02 21. 00 . 01 2 . 17 . 01 8 . 50 . 04 14 .83 . 01 21. 17 . 01 2 . 33 . 01 8 . 67 . 03 15. 00 . 01 21. 33 . 01 2 . 50 . 01 8 . 83 . 02 15. 17 . 01 21 . 50 . 01 2 . 67 . 01 9 . 00 . 02 15. 33 . 01 21. 67 . 01 Apr it 01 03: 16p GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC 14251747-8561 p. 1 GEOTECH13256 NE 20th Street, Suite 16 �T T � Bellevue, WA 98005 CON S V LTA T TSB INC. (425) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Memo JN: ECIE WE 0007, D To Marc Mauney Rona Marc R. McGinnis M AY - 1, Company: Date: April 11, 2001 '• Address: 3821 Cascadia Avenue South FAX: (206) JEFFE•SON COUNTY Seattle,Washington 98188 Phone: (206) DEPT. OF COM UNITY DEVELOPMENT RE Disposal of Stone Runoff from New Impervious Surfaces Proposed Mauney Residence 2137 Oak Bay Road Jefferson County,Washington From discussion with Dave Bobanick of Tillman Engineering, I understand that alternatives for disposal of runoff from the new impervious surfaces are being evaluated. This impervious surface includes the house and the driveway areas. Based on the conditions observed in our test pits, it is my opinion that infiltration of the storm runoff is not the most appropriate disposal method, from a geotechnical engineering standpoint The disturbed soils exposed to the maximum 15-foot depth of the test pits was a silty, fine-grained sand. This soil has a low permeability, and will easily clog from silt and debris that are typically carried into infiltration systems. We would anticipate that the systems would fail within a few years, requiring reconstruction in different areas, orconstruction of a new drainage system. Additionally,even though much of the precipitation falling on the building area appears to infiltrate into the soil,this is aided by evapotranspiration from surface vegetation and trees. We recommend that storm runoff be tightlined to discharge at the base of the bluff along Oak Bay. This may remove a small amount of the groundwater beneath the site, and would result in a system that can be more easily maintained or repaired over time. Where the outfall pipe extends down the bluff, it should be anchored to the bluffs face. This eliminates the need to excavate into the slope and leaves the pipe visible for inspection in the event of future leaks. It will be important that the entire buried portion of the drainage system be periodically checked, probably with a camera, to verify that no pipes have been pulled apart, or are experiencing leaks. Please call with any questions. a • $r‘• Mel' • egS F' ea •.9 c=MIS Design 8924121st Ave.S.E. Newcastle 98056 � . • Turman Engr.-Dave Bobanick (360) 379-0150(FAX) - -4h ,p�C 27ea5R�9 S ION AL IF.: .r 14/1pppv E...�aii I JEFFERSON COUNTY (vle5oN °� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street lL �$ Port Townsend, WA 98368 `91IINCsS Al Scalf, Director May 15, 2001 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA01-00140 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: SHORELINE EXEMPTION: Stormwater Management System Location: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd, Port Hadlock, WA. Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or byMay 29, 2001. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact K RUSSELL at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. • cerely, • , ASAillA J RUSSELL Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 EA CCY6 CY USE ONLY Agency Reference#: ..� Date Received_ Circulated by: ( MAY — (local govt. or agency) JOIN ACUATFteclitaOURCIES FjERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA) DEPT. OF ;I`Y^wc }IBrirj Washington State) kli PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK t ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Project per requirements of RCW 75.20.350. You must submit a copy of this completed JARPA application form, and the (Fish Habitat Enhancement JARPA Addition) to your local Government Planning Department and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day. NOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS —You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working da Based on the instructions provided, I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) E Local Government for shoreline: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑Variance E Exemption ❑ Revision ❑ Floodplain Management ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance ❑ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region) ❑ Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permits(to Regional office-Federal Permit Unit) ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification ❑ Corps of Engineers for: ❑ Section 404 ❑ Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for Section 9 Bridge Permit ❑ US Fish &Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service for Endangered Species Act(ESA)Consultation SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Signature Block)for all permit applications. 1.APPLICANT Dr.Marc Mauney MAILING ADDRESS 3821 Cascadia Ave.South Seattle,WA 98188 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX a 253-591-6713 206-722-6829 if an agent Is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT Ryan Tillman, PE MAILING ADDRESS PO Box 1375 Port Hadlock,WA 98365 WORK PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX# 360-437-0686 tillengr @olypen.com 3.RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY ❑OWNER ❑PURCHASER ❑LESSEE ❑OTHER: 4 NAME,ADDRESS.AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S),IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT. 5 LOCATION(STREET ADDRESS.INCLUDING CITY.COUNTY AND ZIP CODE,WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCUR) 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Jefferson County LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION(CITY OR COUNTY)Jefferson County TRIBUTARY OF WRIA u %SECTION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE GOVERNMENT LOT SHORELINE DESIGNATION NW 18 29N 01E Natural Rural Conservancy LATITUDE 8 LONGITUDE ZONING DESIGNATION IF KNOWN. Rural Residential RR 1-5 TAX PARCEL NO: DNR STREAM TYPE,IF KNOWN 921182012 • JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version,360/407-7037 Page 1 of 4 Frii �� 8.DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY.AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY, IF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACT V a- • -TAN,- � Jaa�emr THIS PROPERTY,INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION. Current use of property is residential.No proposed activity has been completed. J I ' r. -' lI JE:FE,RSCN COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DE`:E CPAENT IS THE PROPERTY AGRICULTURAL LAND? D YES CO NO ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT? D YES O NO 7a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND/OR FILL WORK FOR THE PROJECT THAT YOU WANT TO BUILD THAT NEEDS AQUATIC PERMITS: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE,INCLUDING TYPES OF EQUIPMENT TO BE USED. IF APPLYING FOR A SHORELINE PERMIT,DESCRIBE ALL WORK WITHIN AND BEYOND 200 FEET OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED • No work will be done water ward of Ordinary High Water with this project.Work within 200 feet of Ordinary High Water will consist of sto water conveyance facilities for 6555 SF of new impervious surface.Work outside the 200 ft limit will consist of new home and driveway construction and rel ted stormwater and septic system construction. 7b. DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND WHY YOU WANT OR NEED TO PERFORM IT AT THE SITE. PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY SPECIFIC NEEDS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE DESIGN. The proposed work consists of construction of a new residence.The location of the new home was influenced by a geotechnical report that was done on the property. 7c. DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE,WATER QUAL TY,WATER SUPPLY. RECREATION,and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID,MINIMIZE,AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS,AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION OF FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE. ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET IF ADDITIONAL SPACE IS NEEDED. The project will have no effect on the water body.Stormwater will be treated utilizing current Best Management Practice and will be deposited land ward of Ordinary High Water. PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: SEE SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE,BUT THESE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. 171E CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAYBE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES. 8.WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES? D YES ©NO PROPOSED STARTING DATE. Summer 2001 ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY 6 months 9.CHECK IF ANY STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED: WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAL WATERS;AND/OR DWATERWARD OF MEAN HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS 10.WILL FILL MATERIAL(ROCK,FILL,BULKHEAD.OR OTHER MATERIAL)BE PLACED: ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS? IF YES.VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) /AREA (ACRES) 0 WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAL WATERS? IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARD:) AREA (ACRES) JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version, 360/407-7037 Page 2 of 4 • EC En9E .i.„1 11.WILL MATERIAL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS? I ' I I O YES 123 NO IF YES: A. IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES: LJ I i1/i`-.i/ - / _ , B. HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES.PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. I 1,..))�]YES D NO C. HAS A WETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES.PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. JEFFERSON -yp �� 1 YES D NO __ OF C�,MM„':";(7v pc :DLO?1"ENT D. TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAL(E.G.,SAND,ETC.). ) • E. MATERIAL SOURCE: F. LIST ALL SOIL SERIES(TYPE OF SOIL)LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE.8.INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTY'S LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS.SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(NRCS): 12.WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? D YES IM NO IF YES,IMPACTED AREA IS ACRES. 13.WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS? D YES NO IF YES A. VOLUME: (CUBIC YARDS)/AREA (ACRES) B. COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED: C. DISPOSAL SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAL: D. METHOD OF DREDGING: 14.HAS THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)BEEN COMPLETED? D YES 88 NO SEPA LEAD AGENCY: SEPA DECISION: DNS,MDNS,EIS,ADOPTION,EXEMPTION DECISION DATE(ENO OF PERIOD): SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION 15.LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS,APPROVALS.OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTION,DISCHARGES,OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION(I.E.,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,HEALTH DISTRICT APPROVAL,BUILDING PERMIT,SEPA REVIEW,FEDERAL EN RGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSE(FERC),FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION,ETC.) ALSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE ALL EXISTING ORK ON DRAWINGS. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATE API?ROVED COMPLETED? NO. 16.HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN? ❑YES ®NO IF YES,EXPLAIN: • SECTION B-Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers penults only: 17.TOTAL COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT,INCLUDING MATERIALS,LABOR.MACHINE RENTALS,ETC. 18.LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION: 19.FOR CORPS,COAST GUARD.AND ONR PERMITS,PROVIDE NAMES,ADDRESSES,AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES,ETC.. PLEASE NOTE: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE-CONSULT YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER JARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Permit Assistance Center for latest version,360/407-7037 Page 3 of 4 SECTION C- This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application 20.APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE,COMPLETE,AND ACCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE.THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED,IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WORK. I AGREE TO START WORK ONLY AFTER ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. SIGNATURE OF APPLICOT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE Ze et~,— •etlet•ss•L'- ' 17:er r c yeti I HEREBY CFSIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR) DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S C§1001 provides that: Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than S10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any:) B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought: • These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions. ■ lin 112) 1U LH .1 DARPA,Revised 12/98,contact Ecology's Pennit Assistance Center for latest version, 360/407-7037 Page 4 of 4 SECTION AT BLUFF , VICINITY MAP 1" = 5000' •°ao Rd Hadlock 1 ) I/°°de Rd.N SR 116 ..,.....-" / ( Sow ) 13 Rd. \\ Bay 1 o„ D ., 4. . E. Q ' 1d 1`• Robbins Rd� Chimocum Rd. OAK • Chimacu s. BAY NOT. c 8 Old Oak Bay Rd. 1 s PROJECT CONNEC- LINES. SITE '1 CONSTRI. qo DIRECTEC a. VERIFY C ) i TIME OF IV. y8 CONTOUF 4. 3 WHICH I S ., CONTO F • sk. ��• � Re. doe' • Mats Beach Rd. McCain Rd. "s / • ..-+ ''' \ • • .' fr 1 4_____i z J , . . CP rli o : . : w -� v,, r _.---- ---- * rt.iqr 44 Z N O ierrillar Ir (4 ___-------- L\ 320 H r1r2 ,-- .VZS \ ..-- ot.viv9 tb w o m6:i a o yt0 t*1 n2 � O O to q r 2 = a / . N..1 N.N.,,,,Ni m o 0 0 � 2 • "' x 0 o � - ° iio x m c R a i , m 4. (/)r'1 1 O obi 00 13 O M ,, ;31:: O � 012 rii A M�, • I F---- , .......................•... E 0�O •' q z c, i o D i(D C7 $ 6 ` Oic D y r N O. F}N rn PI (I) O• # / `qO a i NQ I et j _,____ ;14 ± M 8_._i . V ♦ y X11 ° � r 0 G N 1 ` pr- 2 8 48 _ � �' X A 1. z m 'x x6 x M /44 REVISIONS DATE BY 1 77- R PLAN "ri ILL min N ENGINEERING, INC. aKer P1�ESSa�1rK � - — 141 OAK 9a ROAO/PO BOX 1375 Poles WOLOCK rm 1011 KW ....-�.____. 3?I-gA01. 7!D-JJSt-0130 FAX JEFFERSON COUNTY 4 )�SoN`°°er DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � 621 Sheridan Street 0 Port Townsend. WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director May 15, 2001 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA01-00140 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: SHORELINE EXEMPTION: Stormwater Management System Location: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd, Port Hadlock, WA. Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or byMay 29, 2001. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact K RUSSELL at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter, r.6cerely, 1 A RUSSELL Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY (ØöNCQ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti 621 Sheridan Street p$ Port Townsend, WA 98368 "1`SkINe�S Al Scaif, Director June 15, 2001 Dr. Marc Mauney 3821 Cascadian Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98118 RE: MLA01-00140 Dear Dr. Mauney: Please complete the attached Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant and return a recorded copy to the Department of Community Development. Upon receipt, your permits will be issued to install the septic, construct the single-family residence, and tightline your storm-water over the shoreline bluff. Once you sign the agreement and have it notarized it must be recorded at the Jefferson County Auditors Office. Please provide a recorded copy to Community Development. Please contact Jefferson County Community Development at (360) 379-4450 if you have questions regarding the process. Sincerely, �! evin Russell Associate Planner Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Ran_e Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX:i (360) 379-4451 i X NO N D NO Nn 0 0 M N N O O V O O O ■ O O Lh O W a) - •s' 01 —) _ _ R D NO _ '�° N �p \D NJ R i �p oa ° .�- •o -r.. CD a O r.-.) O O o a, 1 V ) .A # N ■ CO ® N O O ,W,`` tic. r-- J IV N 00 0 id i co , CD N .`J O JEFFERSON GO !"hY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY EVE�OPME z 11 ` a 111 rn -n > A W N N C * g K GI" ,01 K N N N O O O C G -0 N - O �: v O y O co 0 co n _ =ri CL 7 = N N n j r. cp CO C W CD N Q CD y C _ O. N N CAD N N co 0 fD N CD N a 7- X N ° m D D --co c° a_ w rn N m CD m v D O co I� I No rN N C y 'C D o M m m o m o F 0 I N 2 CD 3 O Co Co i n li to r 4y1 faee State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 6 Office:48 Devonshire Road-Montesano,Washington 98563-9618-(360)249-4628 June 4, 2001 Dr. Marc Mauney 3821 Cascadia Ave South Seattle, Washington 98188 Dear Dr. Mauney: SUBJECT: Incomplete Hydraulic Project Application Package, stormwater system with tightline to beach, Oak Bay, Tributary to Admiralty Inlet, Jefferson County, WDFW Log No. 00E7844.01 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)received your application for a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) on 17 May 2001. We conducted a site visit with your contractor, Tillman Engineering,but have not yet received updated plans. Your application was incomplete but will be held on file. To complete your application, please submit the following information to me at the above address. If you would prefer to have your application returned to you, please contact me. Written notice of compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), including exemption or type of determination, date of exemption or final determination date, and lead agency is required. Please contact your local planning department for information regarding SEPA requirements and procedures Incomplete plans were submitted with the application. Per our 21 May 2001 meeting with your contractor,please correct plans to accurately reflect OHWM location(base of bank/bluff). Please update plans to reflect agreed plan changes, including removal of rock from project, pipe size to larger than 6" diameter,with outlet to be landward of OHWM. If you plan to use native wood to hide outfall/act as dissipater you will be required to get an HPA. If you do not alter beach/bed in this or any other manner, and make plan changes as specified, you will not require an HPA. Once the above-referenced information has been received by this office, your applic tion will be complete and evaluation of your HPA application will begin. The 45-day re iew period for evaluating applications for HPA per RCW 77.55.100 or 77.55.110 will ns start until the above-referenced information is received. If you have any questions or need assistance in completing your application, please contact me at (360)457-2634. Sincerely, J. Anne Shaffer Area Marine Habitat Biologist JAS:jas:00E 7844.O1i cc: WRIA File, Olympia DoE (Stewart° Jefferson County(Peters) DNR(Shreck) CoE (Gossett) , SHORELINE APPLICATION WITH SEPA REVIEW FORM APPLICATION APPEAL SUBMITTED FILE NUMBER: 41:7F01-000( ❑ APPEAL TO THE BOARD APPLICANT: AMMY DATE OF APPEAL: REPRESENTATIVE: NOTICE PUBLISHED: I EN,N NOTICE MAILED: NAME OF PROJECT: • DECISION RECEIVED: 402/241,4 P PA . ib r') DECISION MAILED: PLANNER: ! ,, APPLICATION RECEIVED: 5 o-11D I H APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICATION COMPLETE D • 'I E: r/16/01 DATE OF APPEAL: NOTIFICATION LETTER MAILED: I NOTICE PUBLISHED: APPLICATION NOT COMPLETE: NOTICE MAILED: REQUEST INFORMATION BY: 577-46"1- DECISION RECEIVED: INFORMATION RECEIVED: DECISION:MAILED: SEPA REVIEW HEARINGS SITE INSPECTION DATE. II SHORELINE COMMISSION NOTICE OF APP. & PE',DING THRESHOLD: IIEARING DATE: MAILED: POSTED: IIEARING LOCATION:PUBLISHED: PUBLISHED: NOTICE MAILED: __-- COMMENT 'ERIOD: DAYS - FROM: TO: CI BOCC HEARING• COM ENTS RECEIVED: HEARING DATE: TIME:______. HD: PWD: NOTICE MAILED: THRESHOLD: DS DNS MDNS MASTER MAILING LIST MAILED; _ I I APOS API' REP INTERESTED PARTIES PUBLISHED: ❑ FIRE DISTRICT 1 2 3 4 5 6 COMMENT P 2IOD: DAYS 13 SCHOOL DISTRICT 20 121 46 48 49 5(1 FROM: TO: 17 CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND COMM • ITS RECEIVED: [1 PUD NI 1-ID: PWD: I] HEALTH DEPARTMENT: LA .F RM DC II PUBLIC WORKS FINAL: FDS FDNS FMDNS I I ASSESSORS OFFICE DEPT: BOMI JIM P DATE: H JEFFERSON TRANSIT END 0 APPEAL PERIOD: _ ❑ PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND MA ED:_ 1] WSD OF TRANSPORTATION LI WSD OF ECOLOGY VARIANCE 3 WSD OF ECOLOGY, SHORELA 'DS ADMINIST TINE DECISION: CI WSD OF F & W, -' •• ; YES 0 COMPLETED: II WSD OF F & W, OLYMPIA / X WSDNR , FORKS 11EARING EXAMINER REVIEW I] WS DNR, OLYMPIA DATE OF IIEA! NG: 11 PORT GAMBLE S'KALLAM TRI E NOTICE MA ED: • 11 OLYMPIC ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL. NOTICE P BLISHED: _ 11 PORT TOWNSEND LEADER POST ' • BY: ❑ PENINSULA DAILY NEWS RECOMMENDATION REC.: CI JILL SILVER, FORKS (11011 RIV:R ONLY) DATE RECOM. MAILED: ❑ BOCC ❑ US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEE' S ❑ AI ) IIII/ / _ ` 0 II:\I'IiRMII\I' .NC'MPIC\DRI)I I VIIiWI ORMS12/99 �� oN o JEFFERSON COUNTY �4. be,, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti c 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director March 30, 2001 MARC MAUNEY 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2133 OAK BAY RD CASE #: BLD01-00180 Dear MARC MAUNEY: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above proposed project and have determined that your application is not complete. The following information is needed by June 28, 2001 to constitute a complete application: A Shoreline Exemption Permit is required for both the Single Family Residence and if the applicant is proposing to tightline stormwater over the marine bluff. In addition, an engineered Stormwater Plan is required. If an applicant refuses to submit additional information, does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90) calendar day period, or does not appeal the decision, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Please advise the Department of Comunity Development in writing of your intentions. Sincerely, / department of Community Developmer Staff c: File i:1F_MLT_incApp_Reginfo.rpt 3/30/01 Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 tLSON co /11. L O 1 ` (46 . .'4' ' JEFFERSON COUNTY --n-(PE---n-(PE- t� , , ti -k'-,y DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D E C E0 U E D 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 lc,,IINO 360/379-4450 • 800/831-2678 • 360/379-4451 Fax _ MAR 2 8 2001 1 1 Master Land Use Permit Application Form JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT,OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN' 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION rn r� r,�q r� Tax Parcel Number: ® m T1 I. Sid m L Subdivision: Lot Number: Property Size: tot hc..tej (acres/square feet) Existing Use of Property: Site Address and/or Directions to Property: i Z.L.1 OAk- Fa4-\ 2 n APPLICANT INFORMATION (98Z4/ Name of Applicant: }�Zh 1414A14)14 Telephone:fa,-1i2 - Address: 38ZI IC.A-sc,eto(A te S �p City: `+� State: (f+)t� Zip Code: - L O(( a Name of Agent(if applicable): Telephone: Address: City: State: Zip Code: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE OR ACTIVITY (include separate sheets as necessary) I04Wrowc Tio✓l 0c A ,ndAl c. . cis4Atli 11%. t)encx 514-tnr?uIR-C (v1L(obi"ci "-Ps ..41titor, of eacc h ct ves..DEvwE.cs-) PERMITS REQUESTED FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY Please check with Permit Center personnel before completing this section and refer to the specific sections of the UDC referenced below for more information and further requirements. Supplemental Applications or Questionnaires may be required for some permits. Type I Permits Refer to: Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing System (EES) UDC Section 6.4.1 and Chapter 8.15 JCC Building Permit UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Allowed "Yes" Use Consistency Analysis UDC Section 3.2.1 and Table 3-1 ❑ Home Business Table 3-1 and UDC Section 4.20 ❑ Stormwater Management UDC Section 6.7 ❑ Road Access UDC Section 6.8 ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment UDC Section 7.2 ❑ Minor PRRD Amendments UDC Section 3.6.13.15 ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) UDC Section 8.7 ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions UDC Section 5 MASTER LAND USE PERMIT.DOC REV.1/19/01 Page 1 Type II Permits Refer to: ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification UDC Sections 3.2.1,3.2.2 and Table 3-1 ❑ Cottage Industry UDC Section 7.3 and Table 3-1 ❑ Short Plat, Preliminary and Final UDC Section 7.3 ❑ Binding Site Plan UDC Section 7.5 ❑ Conditional (Administrative)"C(a)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 ❑ Conditional (Discretionary)"C(d)"Use UDC Table 3-1 and Section 8.8 (Discretionary Permit Review Process Determined by Administrator) ❑ Variance, Minor UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99(UDC Appendix C) ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development(Primary Use) UDC Section 5 ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium for Single- UDC Section 4.16.5(c) Family Residence ❑ Other. Please describe: Type Ill Permits ❑ Conditional"C"Use UDC Section 8.8 ❑ Long Plat, Preliminary UDC Section 7.4 ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval UDC Section 3.6.13 (must be in conjunction with an (PRRD)and Major Amendments underlying land division application) ❑ Variance, Major UDC Section 8.9 ❑ Reasonable Economic Use Variance UDC Section 3.6.4(h) ❑ Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance 06-0712-99 UDC Appendix C ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development(Secondary Use) UDC Section 5 a ❑ Shoreline Management Conditional Use UDC Section 5 V k-\]\ ❑ Shoreline Management Variance UDC Section 5 Type IV Permits ❑ Long Plat, Final UDC Section 7.4 2001 ❑ PRRD, Final UDC Section 3.6.13 MAR 2 H Type V Permits _ ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities) UDC Section 3.3.5 JEFFERSON COUNTY ❑ Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map UDC Section 9 ` DEPT,OF COMMUNE PMENT Amendment ❑ Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment UDC Section 5 Other Local, State or Federal Permits ❑ Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. The action or actions applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential "take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act" or "ESA." Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that that actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to an complying with the ESA. / (APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) ,y / y (DATE) _?2-©f FOR OFFICE USE ONLY School District: Fire District: Plan Area: Land Use Designation: Tech: Date: MASTER LANE USE PERMIT.DOC REV.1/15/01 Page 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I1 UDC LAND USE REVIEW WORKSHEET a Pre-Application # MLA # e:. , 8 e(]1 MAR Applicant/Representative Name: ..IEFFEBSO N CIUNTY Div OF COMMUNITY DEVETE N� REVIEW TYPE PERMIT TYPE FEE REQUIRED TYPE I ALLOWED "YES" USE CONSISTENCY REVIEW 39.00/hr TYPE I HOME BUSINESS 113.00 TYPE I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT/REVIEW 39.00/hr TYPE I SITE PLAN APPROVAL ADVANCED DETERMINATION (SPAAD) 39.00/hr TYPE I TEMPORARY USE 56.00 TYPE I SIGN PERMIT 29.00 TYPE I ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 167.00 TYPE I WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION (CONSISTENCY REVIEW) 39.00/hr TYPE II DISCRETIONARY "D" OR UNNAMED USES 120.00 TYPE II COTTAGE INDUSTRY 281.00 TYPE II CONDITIONAL (ADMINISTRATIVE) "C (a)" USE 281.00 TYPE II CONDITIONAL (DISCRETIONARY) "C (d)" use 281.00 TYPE II VARIANCE (MINOR) 225.00 TYPE II WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION (MINOR) 228.00 TYPE II TEMPORARY USE (UDC SECTION 4.38.2) 56.00 TYPE III VARIANCE, MAJOR 225.00 TYPE III CONDITIONAL "C" USE 281.00 TYPE III WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION [PER 18.42.080(b)] 228.00 TYPE III REASONABLE ECONOMIC USE VARIANCE [UDC SECTION 3.6.4(h)) 169.00 NOTICE OF APPLICATION 111.00 HEARING NOTICE 113.00 NOTICE BOARDS (at cost $7.50 each) APPEAL 400.00 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) REVIEW CHECKLIST 225.00 SEPA Hourly Rate 39.00/hr SUBTOTAL LESS ZONING PRE-APP CREDIT (80.00) GRAND TOTAL These fees are effective February 8, 2000 and are subject to change. Allowed "Yes" Use Consistency Review: This land use review occurs for all residential, commercial, and industrial uses and is subject to a $39.00 per hour review fee. Environmental Review: Additional hourly charge after first 24 hours of review — see Hourly Rate. The Applicant shall be • notified when the hourly charges become effective and upon each additional 24 hour period. Per ordinance #7-00325-96, all Department of Public Works fees for administrative review are charged on the basis of $50.00 per hour. This includes but is not limited to application review, plan check, and site inspections. The Jefferson County Health Department reserves the right to charge a plan review fee per ordinance #12-1209-96. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY FEE RECEIPT # CHECK # DATE H:\homelpincntr\fees\zon.doc 05/00 • TILLMAN KIVLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER 141 OAK BAY ROAD/PO.BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON 98339 ENGINEERING, INC. 360-379-9661 360-379-0150 FAX MAY 232001 May 22, 2001 Kevin Russell,Associate Planner Jefferson County Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Subject: Stormwater Management Report, Marc Mauney Property,2133 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339, PID#9211820i2 Dear Mr. Russell: Attached are 2 sets of revised stormwater plan copies for the subject project. The revisions are based on the requirements of Anne Schafer of the Department of Fish and Wildlife after the site review on May 21,2001. Please forward 1 copy to Ms. Schafer as she requested. Please contact me at 379-9661 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, /9V:14), C David F. Bobanick Tillman Engineering, Inc. copy: Dr. Marc Mauney Jon Simpson Steve Kunkel File Kevin Russell From: Anne Shaffer[shaffjas @olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:36 AM To: Kevin Russell Subject:'" Mauney Card for Anne Shaffer Kevin, Based on discussion with Dave this morning, this project does not need an HPA PROVIDED that the pipe diameter is less than 6"; ' the pipe opening to the beach is kept to the base of the bluff, and no more than one existing log is moved, provided that the work is all done by hand (no equipment on or affecting beach) . And of course that NO other alterations to beach or bank, including removal of vegetation, occur. Please forward a copy of this to Dave, I am out of the office for two weeks. ImlategottagotalktoyouafterthefirstweekofJuly.JAS. DI al+ a 1 II I III I NI I 1 II 111111 II II II 11 I II 4,832BA .244148'88n County, WA MARC MAJNEY HO 1 1LD 11.00 JIM 13 2001 AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: JEFFERSON COUNTY PROSECUTINe ATTORNEY Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantor(s): Marc Mauney Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this /9 day of June, 2001 by [grantor(s)] Marc Mauney, mailing address is 5427 118th Ave. S.E., Bell:vue Washington 98006 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall constitu e a burden upon, and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described eal property located Sec. 18 Twp. 29N R O 1 E Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 921182012 . Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement as well as execution of a waiver for a building and septic system located inside of a Geological Hazard Area as defined by Section 3.6 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, shall be granted by the Grantee a building and septic penni I as per RCW 19.27, the Uniform Building Code, and the Jefferson County Unified • 1 444813 II I 111III11I1I1I 111 ee/20/200f O9 2SF Jefferson County, WA MARC MRUNEY HOLD 11.00 Development Code to allow for the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence on a portion of land that contains an Environmen . lly Sensitive Area. In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the installation of a septic system and construction of a single-family residence, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire(s) to install a septic system and construct a single- family residence. The property is situated in close proximity to a landslide hazard area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in building at close proximity to the landslide hazard area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees) that may at any time arise, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation,administrative code or County Ordinance. III 111 I I I II III II III 111 IIIII D II ,04 m4fm3zaA J.rtor,on County, WA MARC MAUNEY HOLD 11 00 4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. I I III 11110/111 III ' 444813 I�I1I,1 Pam 4 of 4 Jaihrmon County WA MARC MAUNEY 06!2012001 00:208 HOLD 11.00 THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written above. �/ GRANTORS MARC MAUNEY l01 ell,.0Sto�y° . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) •% a°' y s o : )ss. .d+ ••. .I Iss`.••,Z•.•COUNTY OF ■t v► 11 ..'•• .. . I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Marc Mauney, signed this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. rthis i 74.day of, //L , 20W t name:�q}yty } RlSaR1 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Washington, County of K,N(r residing at w . My commission expires: /o-1-a y Approved '/ - efferson County Unified Development Code Administrator: By: r� ',4 6 ate: - (../ l Al Scalf Unified Development Code Administrator Approved as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney • By: 1S! lia.. ..�a.t,a. Date: 0 0 Juelanne Dalzell, County Pro•. uting Attorney �1 } CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 921182012 Printed: March 29, 2001 Cases Review Type Status Planner BLD01-00179 I P K RUSSELL No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD01-00180 I P K RUSSELL No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP01-00044 I P K RUSSELL No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00117 N No findings, conditions, or permissions found. Page 1 of 1 • ~Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number. 921182012 Owner Mailing Address: MARC C MAUNEY 3821 CASCADIA AVE S SEATTLE WA 981181128 Site Address: 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK 98339 Section: 18 School District Chimacum(49) Qtr Section: N W1/4 Fire Dist Chimacum(1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 211 Mapped 9.7 Planning area: Tri-Area 4 Acreage: ( ) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S18 T29 R1E TAX 9 Notes: A - y t. +;Y !$-7_.4d 3,5-04-1c 4?rr•f / 117' /9-2 /e 2-IY-9/ vta�zf :J, w/etas ^ http://www.co jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=921182012 3/29/01 Map Output Page 1 of 1 FEATURES NOT SURVEYED-921 182 012/MAUNEY Legend SelecteU_Features 41 Shorerne Photos • Towns g21073011��_ g21°73°26 921073025 �.r' Road System 92 1 07 3 015 _ : Parcels 921073012 \\ ._—.. Zoning 1:031:00[02 CROSSROADS-GC 021073005 921073014 CROSSROADS-NC CROSSROADS-CC _. 929073020 _ MPR-SNJ=AM.TRCT -4. l ■ PORT TOWNSEND UG ` } RURAL RES. 1-10 I� 92118?008 \ll NDUSTR IAL r RES.BASED BID I 92 118 2 003 I LIGHT NDUSTR IAL El WASTE FACLITY . NATIONAL FOREST 92115201? arrrA AIRPORT UNKNOWN N MPR-OPEN SPACE 00xW:01 MPR-RECREAT ION • . MPR-RCCF fl( MPR-VLLG CENTER S RURAL CENTER �'Q1^ 92 118 2 007 RURAL FOREST 9211$2005 4) MPR-SNGLE FAML 000000230 MLITARY AG-20 MPR-MOLT FAM LY . RURAL RES. 1-20 921182020 921182034 g21182027 ■ 921182028 NATIONAL REFUGE Mepp provided by Jefferson County kenlrel Serrioes-IDMS a ggi V ''� . PARK,RECREATION . RURAL RES.1-S NHOLDNG FOREST COM.FOREST GLEN COVE LC FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. oning information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made during the 1999 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Zoning designations must be confirmed with the Department of Community Development. http://ww,../com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=East_Parcels&Form=True&Encode=Tru 3/29/01 • UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Master#MLA01 -00140 Review Type Project Planner: K RUSSELL BLD01-00179 I BLD01-00180 SEP01-00044 I SDP01-00016 I Applicant: MARC MAUNEY Site Address: 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S 2133 OAK BAY RD SEATTLE WA 98118 PORT HADLOCK WA, 98339 Project Description: SHORELINE EXEMPTION: Stormwater Management System Project Location: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18,Township 29,Range 01 East,WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd,Port Hadlock,WA. Parcel Number: 921182012 S-T-R: 18-29N-01E Legal Description S18 T29 R1E TAX 9 Total Acreage: 10 Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 4 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel N 5300690190B Flood District: School Distric 49 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Assesor's Map [ ] Forest Lands: Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding Setback: [ ] Mineral Lands: [ ] Agricultural Lands: [ ] ESA's Wetlands: Aquifer Recharge Area: Stormwater site plan submitted Flood: Rare Plants: Erosion: Landslide"(- Seismic: Fish &Wildlife: Stream Type: Shoreline Designation: 5•V /\ Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport MRL Forest Lands Landscaping Required: Parking Spaces Required Building Height Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&PPR: 10% Rural Residential: 25% RVC,RI, LI/C:max of 20,000 sq ft NC:max 7,500 sq ft Rural Commercial: 60% LI: max 25,000 sq ft CC:max 5,000 sq ft Rural Industrial: 60% GC: max 10,000 sq ft HI,PPR:none specified Total Building (s) Size: Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: Road Classification: Road Approach: SEPA Required: Flood Certificate: Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): Violations: Plat Conditions: Over 5yrs=UDC Recorded Date of Subdivision: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance Stormwater Requirements: PARCEL TAGS: Title Notes - Updated 1.) UNSTABLE SOILS This parcel has a deep seated slide. For further 3/22/00 information contact Mike Ajax. Associated CASES and status: BLD01-00179 P BLD01-00180 P SDP01-00016 P SEP01-00044 P SEP79-00117 N • UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Master#MLA01-00140 Review Type Project Planner: K RUSSELL BLD01-00179 I BLD01-00180 I SEP01-00044 I Applicant: MARC MAUNEY Site Address: 3821 CASCADIAN AVE S 2133 OAK BAY RD SEATTLE WA 98118 PORT HADLOCK WA, 98339 Project Description: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Project Location: Parcel number 921 182 012 in Section 18,Township 29,Range 01 East,WM located at 2133 Oak Bay Rd,Port Hadlock,WA. Parcel Number: 921182012 S-T-R: 18-29N-01E Legal Description S18 T29 RIE TAX 9 Total Acreage: 10 Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 4 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel N 5300690190B Flood District: School Distric 49 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Assesor's Mapes GvNtG� �Co � [ ] Forest Lands: S Adjoining Forest Lands: r T v j 7 b/v Inholding go ra '3e`'s Setback: qD�( [ ] Mineral Lands: Omit-ge'`t ie"��( 41, eyp4 1 4 [ ] Agricultural Lands: �♦ le, A-Cr2 S 42 S Tc [ ] ESA's Wetlands: cr t $ h � Aquifer Recharge site plan submitted �d Flab inA Stormwater site lan submitted Erosion: ----- Landslide: Lis514� Cr f Seismic: � P� Fish &Wildlife: Stream Type: —110 U121t\76- CAS �tY Shoreline Designation: ��c.012 Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport /"'^ Lands Landscaping Required: Parking Spaces Required Building Height Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands& PPR: 10% Rural Residential: 25% RVC, RI,LUC: max of 20,000 sq ft Rural Commercial: 60% LI: max 25,000 sq ft NC: max 7,500 sq ft Rural Industrial: 60% GC: max 10,000 sq ft CC: max 5,000 sq ft HI, PPR: none specified Total Building (s) Size: Setbacks: Front: Sides: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: Road Classification: - Road Approach: SEPA Required: Flood Certificate: Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): Violations: Plat Conditions: Stormwater Requirements: - PARCEL TAGS: Ti le Notes Updated 1.) UNSTABLE SOILS This parcel has a deep seated slide. For further 3/22/00 information contact Mike Ajax. Associated CASES and status: BLD01-00179 P nn�n1 �/ J- BLD01-00180 P � N�.`l\vCJ 5EP01-00044 SEP79-00117 C:\MV Documents\Crvstal Reports\R MLT Case ConsistRev.rpt March 29.2001