Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BLD2014-00044
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: WA STATE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISS 7150 CLEANWATER KY# 11 OLYMPIA WA 98504 DATE ISSUED:June 17, 2015 DATE EXPIRES: June 17,2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA14-00011 PROJECT PLANNER: Donna Frostholm PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building, shoreline exemption, and flood development applications to replace existing foot bridge and two culverts with pre-fab 45-foot-long bridge consisting of two 11-foot-wide lanes and a 5-foot-wide pedistrian walkway with guard rail posts. Construct floodplain terraces and stream habitat improvements within an approximately 1,200-foot-long channel. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number: 502 021 001, Site Address: HWY 101 Brinnon Wa, S-T-R: 2-25N-2W CONDITIONS: 1.) HOLD - Jefferson County Public Health shall be notified prior to moving the drainfield spoils and placement in the treatment area. An inspection by JCPH is required to verify compliance with the conditions of placement of the soils and lime. 2.) H -The drainfields will be decommissioned and the soils removed to an area inspected and approved by JCPH on April 24, 2015. The area for disposal and treatment of the drainfield spoils is on the south side of the area known as Group Camp#1. The area is protected by a large rock barrier and no entry signs due to unstable trees on a steep slope to the south of the area. Additional signage shall be added to assure that visitors and campers do not access the area. Signage shall read 'Soil Treatment area - Do Not Enter' or similar. 3.) The material that is removed from the drainfield that has come into contact with waste water must be treated/decontaminated prior to final disposal. The material from the system shall be removed and stockpiled to allow for pathogen die-off. The material shall be placed in 6"-8" lifts and spread with lime. The location for the stockpile shall be approved by the Health Officer and shall meet all requirements of an onsite sewage system (setbacks from surface waters and wells and vertical separation). It shall be covered and protected from erosion (covered with plastic or several inches of uncontaminated soil and straw, etc.). After the material has been stockpiled for a minimum of one year, the material may be used without site restrictions. 4.) The septic tanks associated with the drainfields (case number SEP79-00289)that are being decommissioned may be retained for emergency storage in case of a power failure of the new MBR wastewater treatment system. The tanks shall be permanently capped prior to removal of the drainfields from the area. 5.) The approval by JCPH is based on the signed agreement by Ed Girard, SW Region Manager WSP, that the comfort station shall be connected to the sewage system prior to beginning any excavation in the vicinity of the drainfields. If it is not connected to an approved and operable sewage treatment plant the building will be closed/locked until connection is complete and the treatment system is approved to operate. The signed agreement was received via email April 9, 2015. 6.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 7.) Construction Materials and Methods of Construction to Reduce Flood Hazard: (i)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; and (ii)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. 8.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 9.) The site plan, as submitted with the building application on March 16, 2015, has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated June 1, 2015 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a bridge replacement with stream improvements only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) This project was reviewed and approved as a shoreline exemption under JCC 18.25.090(19). 12.) A geotechnical report prepared by Krazan and Associates (dated April 27, 2015)was submitted on May 5, 2015. The applicant shall adhere to all recommendations in this report, including having the project geologist onsite during bridge construction. 13.) PRIOR TO ISSUING A FINAL BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED APRIL 27, 2015 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE"GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 14.) The applicant shall implement the proposal based on sheets received by DCD on March 16, 2015, including the stormwater pollution prevention plan, the general construction notes, and the planting plan. 15.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 16.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 17.) This project is subject to the FEMA Biological Opinion. Federal approvals are issued if the project complies with the Endangered Species Act. To address the Biological Opinion, the applicant shall adhere to all conditions in the permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Work on this project shall not begin until a federal permit has been issued. 18.) This parcel is within a no shooting area per JCC 8.50. 19.) The parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserves, and Recreation (PPR) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. Recreational facilities are an allowed use in this zoning designation (Table 3-1, JCC). FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this activity on December 9, 2013 under Control Number 132315-1. The HPA expires on September 30, 2016. 3.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on October 7, 2013. 4.) This proposal will be conducted within shoreline jurisdiction (floodplain of the Dosewallips River) and the shoreline designation of the Dosewallips River is Conservancy. This is an approval to restore fish habitat along Twana Creek and the proposal complies with JCC 18.25.090(19). 5.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments are included as "critical habitat" for listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. s/ `_ UD•Admi P' tAi j k w` 4 •.. C s rift, idot, LL 6311-/7 4` fIP°1400 r el-r4s fv licL�1 q G LO i lGf '�e \\tidemark\data\forms\F MLT_IssuePermit_U.rpt 6/18/2015 Page 3 of 3 '- ! ,t6 .. -...., A ; w • 1:::1 Rt) (2) ›. . fi. ,, A •r n VD m C040 _ . R" N s iniaiwiwi Nils L ' r ' r ►+� _ � \ � 0 z' s w > z 8 ,.. ›Li 4 1 Rimi 6 P e •.:. ' j V '� Y 11"—i do.,,,,\r"--J dy � f ON lir I. % C C) f 11: . i /4 Do:... l.. f .$ ... L, ..__ - ,:i.. u . 1 ..„-,:i -, c, 0 ',>- ,, 1 1 1 y . ,-zi 8+, . 1/3 \ & . , ,...," ,:. : ri4410,--- , g 0 . .► P ` ., , , --„, ; , ,,,;„„:„..00, ,,,1 . 1 ,.., ., , , ki , „,,,;,0,., ; „. ".,,..... $vr. 17"-^4'7';':'• .1 z!, ,, 1 140ger-4, E pi g 50„ . , . , ,.:. ::.,..: .:pi .. 1 , C 4 , _.... ..... . , , ,,,„...,. ._ , tc„. ,, ,..) it,,, 'it o ›i''' o o 1 m ,t;) i ; B ,.. , CD g _ ,,, 0 1 . m ____1( _. - tv N.,_ i Z I:f) di ��Ff�r' r” '':11/4%, "" ,, . '1 . . 5 1 1, . ; E o R fua !X s N x.r x� * 'EA wA tk t-. wa w. p+ uw CI Gn ' w " w C - L _ _ i'- j x r, �,+. L 'C:*77::::: :' tr•° rn r kri r 2 r r Ft'. Cr Pr i C? f<- Mrr B . ► ��± �.rri C7 7 C7 C3 S C7 41 © t G s7 za 4 ' LI 0 4, - Za - - Z - Zaz ' ca" Zr' Cyr- _ i a z n Ta r. pry r �nn ''. „ L. CO NJ NJ rs2 p=4 W. WW, V? CM W ill ,'.,7 GAa r ra nd I—' N F-' N) Q III Y q ,., Rmt.... .� C? +J5 r,7 Q CA 45 -t> 4t �,i . ;- '�n.. s,. C7 O, ;�jqy 7C� c� { i 15 , ,e O V .ro -- 'A.., ♦ LL4L�' I •2 `7 rill 4 s€ i '3l A !xe ls. LE;411�''4... . € ,^•,..�'+ at, R '' .- s p t `b.. 0 . ,.�' 'i' '' k 0 r Ir qt' ` ��3s ■ +1, ,: ‘''''''://,44 t 4,7 h.. s, .M`L yX p _ '2 g 'le ,„„ er. ..,.„4-?a=a.. ' 4 I., 7' ''' - ' V41, "eh al 131 [11 r,Li A (V : ;'/42:„„...;,,'',/' --- .''r.,''.„,-,' .,�Ord - - -" Tlkl +� T �p ,$ ii 5�,,ey' /fy €""'"-:. . yr▪ °. s';„ y -:5^. 3 y'} '"'€ -- 1 Rt Nil.,r, J i5 y� € C'i -E.. f ,Y.... m - ✓ M ` 3Y a 7 I .. Ha if , *- C . �r� b � ' � p"`f4 d,7 i } f e I,' $j"'a; ii g r 2 �Y �A r Yom' � i t t r i t 4\T.,e �ti �,'— . dd s 1 rf B - j t } €iy9 ftc�.i f s,''',,/,,,8: f d "' _::::-.—_—,11-17::,:."71:—::::'1,1::".,,,,,,\I- ,,,i, ., �3,- ))-f,t,1, , -:,,,, •. t.i ,1,, T.,„ f o, i �5 i. "'•r t , S,i f1 i i} t !1 t .mr Y"4Y / }. A d 4 *, F z«r i.r h � it `s —" 1 * + rd l9 � E t'hie ▪ p ( i , . f �t�l 1iill/ f€l�S�}}f `FF.ff s ft /litit{�'ti;i'. f�.' ,: Ii t `' w ,� d � �,/ f // i 5 -:,Ffir'+' ` . r'i it I f z € , - i-, h' b -y / 1 i '' ifts,:,,, A'�': i : ri ppp�t:f�y pi/S4, 4, ? ' t$II".^ 4",,,,,.�. : „..--.....,..” _ 1 ''J`5t { h„6,0, t / t a VT \\y .t} . 7:,(," �'t 1`f i�t b .,a p €t {e?i' „IF. J �. ./,,. d j f f l' r 1 y { ;ice p ' e pp e r q r j{y� 4 Py r l^ {})w f (n j',f` ff`,^ S /1 IA y',,i''�.�/tF+' .}°y ' c3 r* r y +;s'" ,, -'%`�' `+ • sw ." ,r -f'.^+^,,, ' ',„ 1:6' 'r r'yrt',7,,/i t fv `" l " 'ice-°'W^" B ' 'fia ' �YyF �. �y t p''� l •,p,,.- eft.,„4' ?. r .N„ ✓ Y -- (. ▪ . h+ iYf YJ°rfdr ,1r f' 9+. ,�',r - •S1D „.. + 5€ f fr,'' .'/ 4---,,,-- 'f s' s°' g... ` '' ,q ,�„.',.. �r1 f mfg'/} .71;4- ' r ▪� .'�� , r f r r 01- -% y " .r f i t •.•- i i 76" r€' ` z'a r' t ,, F }• _ A, Y f , -,`==q - "f f ' .' f iF \ #.7Wia ,: y`� B .rYy. ''� '� z� , +}. k' j � '°( t i � ,+� 1 «s� � }� ',rt 4.,+"5f,1:,;$.:�;:V '/.J �/yy,, ,yr rr; fryer, •° ,▪ , , : - .- „ i'';. sµ „_ x,�-^,d z,„ ri,:ff+ 1 4:1 t'fF�Pp'; S: s r. '' � "1'”' C k/7'4,, EbA x '"' � 5 �,-' >.` 'ji�tlp° f ♦ .t..l ,'^'`V; i P '',,n�eL � r it „4rg {y^{''''::—'3'.' --° 6�' i J 3'P�'Yr lif f .j� yt Ci rt ', ,,..,,,.% �r .e: b ;.+ s..'Y. J` L.., '4 / s +�$" _,nom._ ;, 1 31#a• „f f..✓ g f!r " fi --," `h rx..p 4 x II r9^' j iv:., s ,„ 1-- , //c1;`F ji 0 �Sf, '1**,`. ,/,F^' ., p q �p "� k ;II t. �s••� ^ t' '".l7 F v> i4'4, '?r ,,. 1�„ r ? i '',. � ,. ,rl c v,X e 1�,� fit; +� .x -..a' . rr 5�M ;+" 7 r �, -, ,� (---- �.,, f 5 �i x `'`�"` fir`. '_ .— 'r, '�' 5 �47� P y$F r - i�fll ; r r .y A i' A ''= t l r p ., '-•-•-...., i P� , -'•-1 °', r f l. . , •` ' p t 9i pi P r . ' ) ' a ) „ f 'm. 2 %, -.'-,. =..-.' '' _ i" ' f..,. _ � ^I . ,t i « ! ,r,,,.. . te ' - ..■ J . r ,i�"? .4 M rif «.^.M „,..,,,7444!..7444-.77C- t r _, ,, / lY” '1, ' ii °, „ ' __ 4.^°' - '''`'''...'4''''''-'-'4' ,. „r '. - �,,. i y r -7- Eli e ti m t r * 7 . c) li 48 '4 °"-; Z « _, _ . .,. ..4 .. .,n . - Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 10:14 AM To: 'Wollwage, Lance (DAHP)' Subject: RE:Twana Creek mla14-00011 Hello Lance: As a follow up to your email earlier this week, I wanted to let you know that I have forwarded your request for a survey on to the applicant, Deborah Petersen with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Wollwage, Lance (DAHP) [mailto:Lance.Wollwage @DAHP.wa.gov] Sent: Monday,July 13, 2015 2:49 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject:Twana Creek mla14-00011 Hello Ms Frostholm: Attached please find my request for a cultural resources survey of the project area for the Twana Creek Fish passage project. Thank you, Lance Wollwage Ph.D. I Archaeologist 360.586.3536 I Iance.wollwageadahp.wa.gov Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation I www.dahp.wa.gov 1110 Capitol Way S, Suite 30 I Olympia WA 98501 PO Box 48343 I Olympia WA 98504-8343 1 Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday,July 17, 2015 10:09 AM To: 'Petersen, Deb (PARKS)' Subject: FW: Twana Creek mla14-00011 Attachments: 071315-24-WSPRC_071315.pdf Hi Deb: This is a follow up to the voicemail I just left on your cell phone. I recently received this request for a cultural resources survey from DAHP, which I am forwarding on to you. They may want the survey conducted prior to any ground disturbance begins. Hope all is going well with you. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: Wollwage, Lance (DAHP) [mailto:Lance.Wollwage @DAHP.wa.gov] Sent: Monday,July 13, 2015 2:49 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject:Twana Creek mla14-00011 Hello Ms Frostholm: Attached please find my request for a cultural resources survey of the project area for the Twana Creek Fish passage project. Thank you, Lance Wollwage Ph.D. I Archaeologist 360.586.3536 1 lance.wollwageCc�dahp.wa.gov Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation I www.dahp.wa.gov 1110 Capitol Way S, Suite 301 Olympia WA 98501 PO Box 483431 Olympia WA 98504-8343 1 Donna Frostholm From: Wollwage, Lance (DAHP) <Lance.Wollwage @DAHP.wa.gov> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 2:49 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Twana Creek mIa14-00011 Attachments: 071315-24-WSPRC_071315.pdf Hello Ms Frostholm: Attached please find my request for a cultural resources survey of the project area for the Twana Creek Fish passage project. Thank you, Lance Wollwage Ph.D. I Archaeologist 360.586.3536 I lance.wollwage @dahp.wa.gov Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation I www.dahp.wa.gov 1110 Capitol Way S, Suite 30 I Olympia WA 98501 PO Box 48343 I Olympia WA 98504-8343 1 Andrew Kohl 6794 Laurelhurst Drive NW Bremerton, WA 98311-8905 • dahp,.._.,,.... itopa Allyson Brooks Ph.D..Director State Historic Preservation Officer July 13, 2015 Ms. Donna Frostholm Jefferson County 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA, 98368 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 071315-24-WSPRC Property: Twana Creek Fish Passage Re: Archaeology- Survey Requested Dear Ms. Frostholm: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The area has the potential for archaeological resources. Further, the scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources present. Identification during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to the resource. Therefore, we recommend a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. We also recommend consultation with the concerned Tribes' cultural committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues. If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process from SEPA and requires formal government-to-government consultation with the affected Tribes and this agency. We would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. These comments are based on the information available at the time of this review and on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer. Should additional information become available, our assessment may be revised. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, / Lance Wollwage, Ph.D. Transportation Archaeologist (360) 586-3536 lance.wollwage @dahp.wa.gov .Q,STATE.0.n State of Washington • Department of Archaeology&Historic Preservation o P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia,Washington 98504-8343 • (360) 586-3065 Y www.dahp.wa.gov "s ,' tit ,a, ° Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1' c — 1 - n.^.SP.lvelln9 V.\ 71:li 1 cc • o b J ` Q r - J ✓J r n. Legend u'''' g „ Selected Features l DI �rh Township Lines ktri' JC_Roads \.\.� Parcels-H t� r_7 Shoreline Designation-Arc Tt I f* C on mrwngtSueu roan �Y �� 4/ Conser anry 1atural /l-,* Urban 1 . Su nu ran 1 -411111 % filirm.ii___::::,:.. doh I 4 /1 Natural Conservancy ♦ 1 A. N at a rat'Sn o n man Naps pradad by Mier son Co.a*Conatl Sv:e.fa:.emu 0=1'6,1611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Jun 18 14:24:26 +015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 6/18/2015 Donna Frostholm From: Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget (DNR) <Bridget.Kaminski-Richardson @dnr.wa.gov> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 2:18 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: mla14-00011 state parks twana creek Hi Donna, This use does not to take place on DNR-managed land and therefore I have no comments. Thanks, Bridget Bridget Kaminski-Richardson Washington State Department of Natural Resources 360-732-0934 Original Message From: Donna Frostholm [mailto:DFrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday,June 01, 2015 1:42 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY); Waldbillig, Chris M (DFW); Kaminski-Richardson, Bridget (DNR);Toy, Mark C (DOH); Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP); 'Cynthia Rossi'; 'Roma Call'; 'Steve Todd'; 'Randy Lumper';Jerry J. Gregory (Jerald.J.Gregory @usace.army.mil) Subject: FW: mla14-00011 state parks twana creek Greetings All: Attached is a reviewer letter for an application DCD received from State Parks to improved Twana Creek in the Dosewallips State Park. Below is a link to the submittal. http://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/W ebl inkExternal/DocView.aspx?id=1286534&dbid=0 If you have any comments, please let me know by June 15, 2015. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD µ 'Donna Frostholm From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 1:42 PM To: Richard A. Mraz; Chris Waldbillig; Bridget.Kaminski-Richardson @dnr.wa.gov; mark.toy @doh.wa.gov; 'Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP)'; 'Cynthia Rossi'; 'Roma Call'; 'Steve Todd'; 'Randy Lumper'; Jerry J. Gregory (Jerald.J.Gregory©usace.army.mil) Subject: FW: mla14-00011 state parks twana creek Attachments: reviewer letter.pdf Greetings All: Attached is a reviewer letter for an application DCD received from State Parks to improved Twana Creek in the Dosewallips State Park. Below is a link to the submittal. http://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/Webli n kExterna l/DocView.aspx?id=1286534&dbid=0 If you have any comments, please let me know by June 15, 2015. Regards, Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY s -r'% DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.cojefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email:dcd @co.jefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning June 1, 2015 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA14-00011 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Building, shoreline exemption, and flood development applications to replace existing foot bridge and two culverts with pre-fab 45-foot-long bridge consisting of two 11-foot-wide lanes and a 5-foot-wide pedistrian walkway with guard rail posts. Construct floodplain terraces and stream habitat improvements within an approximately 1,200-foot-long channel. Associated with SEP79-289. Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by June 15, 2015. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Donna Frostholm Donna Frostholm cc:, \\tidemark\data\forms\F MLT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 6/1/2015 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 o e E SON^ C =° O O C 0 0 0 0 0 > ) Le. Ln in U N\ +-' 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 [ O 0 0 0 ,n 0 0 0 0 `N. sr- N R 0 000 ' n V^\ d O N M M s za N C \"4. F w 7 R 7 V AO O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N r- -004, b N N N N N N N N cs w L U CC 0 ;G W w W W ;4 22222222 L w w e 0 7 7 O C z M h Y O "" M Dg 3 O w O 0 0 7 0 OM d' O —. Qi O M — O N w — co 00 O o0 00 N N • O N ul h 00 h h M N 7 7 00 m 7 V en O M M M M m M M M GP • w e O w ■l u. 4.■ _ •N A W 0 y G :: U CO y Q o os G4 U i 0 c U C £ 0q _ .0 2 ?r 'C y > U L ` n o W — Ucv5a � A a w D fill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, N N N N N N N '= -'4'-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Q N N N N N N N M M M M M M M N N N N N N N W my W 0 0 0 00' 0 0 N 9 - A � '17-■ o ' '6:,' C00 TA * — —. N- — -0, - a, N Ch w° a - >W Q L.) W a. U co)U a.1 a,, cn ^U A 18.15.040 C raw g3Ato1.uegan C 0� pow";tied pue alepuoll JJI 8I'8I�aldey�aag u • uo!leaaaag pue saA.rasaad s)led U U 0 u . d v b o A z a z z z > z u U z z le!J snpuI,(Aran E u z z z .4 z j j y: z z j. z z Q z 74 (A+almsed pue auaal!na) g U 0 0 0 6 0 6 ; ; o 0 6 0 0 0 • 8u!mpeukury�!e!alsnpu13gJ „a z z z y� z >� y Z z y zzA z ano)ualJ)leuisnpul 111g11'I 1 U z z z y z . y y z z ; z z z io 0 ) N N, ;N N > `a /upjaunuome!1npul q ; z z z yz > yj. 0 z ., z z A z le!13snpul pasetuaa.inosau U z z z 4 z ; y°', y: z z j, z z A z ; > > , CO U 0 ° peoasso1D Ieaaua) 0 >, y . , > >, � U. > z �U- A z:'u 4 peoisso.0 aupswpooglogq2 all Z U � y+ �, y. •+ �„ y; z u >' z U A z 0 UU ° : >4 : °U peoissoaj aauauanuo- z z z >. y. y y 0 al z 0 o. a U › > ? › Clalua3 aell!A IeJn U , y, , u , z U u °N j A 53Jv ona I u z z z . 0 u U 0 v U U U U R C 0 -0 •. › V , U u u a sand o1/fl I U z z z . z j v u u A u 4 R a n. O O O N O = N 'W't L 'p --6' A _ salav sins 1 a U z z z yz u u u u u u u 4. ,e $n!PloquI pue C 0 0 0 o a o ; 0 0 0 0 0 a I (emu elaaawmo3-Isalod U z z z U z U 0 U z u z z z z z d U L 0 U o VI U o rn 0 ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ieao pue augld-lelnin ! V " u z z z u z 0 z 0 z z z z z 8 N 8 el c c° r. 6 o ^ 4 C w 5 •a 0 a m o L0, C \,____\ • W v et 0 ' C. a. N Lam' N t1 •1) N N ✓! u 'IN O b u b W G 2 A w a •u 0 ..0 2 a n .4 a Co 0 v@ 3 C4 b V O CL 0 N O V 'G .��. y N ee .q CO w d 6 E "0 w 3 '[" •0 G a C 6" 7 0 d v wo 0, R' o . o ._ b„ u o u :o .. on u > y a ;I. t o . 3 eE =° g ea C v c7 a' a ao g H " 0 ° 6) `p`4) E 0 v xx � > 3a � a •❑ (Revised 8/06) 18-54 Donna Frostholm From: Amy Stonkus <stonkus @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:21 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Deb (PARKS) Petersen Subject: Twana Creek Project - Geotech Report and Stockpile Locations Attachments: 102-12020 Twana Creek Geotech Report 4-27-15.pdf; ATT00001.txt; Twana Creek TSEC PLAN.pdf Hi Donna, Please find attached the additional information you requested for the Twana Creek project consisting of the temporary stockpile locations and the signed geotechnical report. Please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks. Amy Stonkus, P.E. Ecologist/ Engineer Wild Fish Conservancy 206.349.3955 I 1 ),O I ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION TWANA CREEK FISH BARRIER#997962 RESTORATION AND REMOVAL PROJECT DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK 306996 U.S.HIGHWAY 101 BRINNON,WASHINGTON 98320 PROJECT No.102-12020 APRIL 27,2015 Prepared for: WILD FISH CONSERVANCY NW ATTN:MR.ARNY STONKUS,P.E. P.O.BOx 402 DUVALL,WASHINGTON 98019 Prepared by: KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 1230 FINN HILL ROAD POULSBO,WASHINGTON 98370 (360)598-2126 `-=- on & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION April 27,2015 KA Project No. 102-12020 Wild Fish Conservancy NW P.O. Box 402 Duvall,Washington 98019 Attention: Mr.Arny Stonkus,P.E. RE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION Twana Creek Fish Barrier#997962 Removal and Restoration Project Dosewallips State Park 306996 U.S.Highway 101 Brinnon,Washington 98320 Dear Mr. Stonkus, In accordance with your request, we have completed a Geotechnical Engineering Investigation for the referenced project. The results of our investigation are presented in the attached report. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 1 . D ± Michael Rundquist,PE Senior Project Manager MDR/vc/rn Offices Serving The Western United States 1230 Finn Hill Road,Poulsbo,Washington 98370•(360)598-2126•Fax:(360)698-2127 IKrazan & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION 3 SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 GROUNDWATER 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 Site Preparation 6 Shallow Foundations 7 Structural Fill 8 Temporary Excavations 9 Erosion and Sediment Control 10 Testing and Inspection 11 LIMITATIONS 11 VICINITY MAP Figure 1 SITE PLAN Figure 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION Appendix A EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS Appendix B Offices Serving The Western United States 1230 Finn Hill Road,Poulsbo,Washington 98370•(360)598-2126•Fax:(360)698-2127 & ' SSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION April 27,2015 KA Project No. 102-12020 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION TWANA CREEK FISH BARRIER#997962 REMOVAL AND RESTORATION PROJECT DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK 306996 U.S.HIGHWAY 101,BRINNON,WASHINGTON 98320 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation for the proposed Twana Creek Fish Barrier # 997962 Removal and Restoration project on Dosewallips State Park located at 306996 U.S. Highway 101 in Brinnon, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. Discussions regarding site conditions are presented herein, together with conclusions and recommendations pertaining to site preparation, excavations, structural fill, foundations, drainage and landscaping,and erosion control. Twana Creek is currently conveyed beneath a Dosewallips State Park access road via culverts consisting of two 36-inch diameter pipes. We understand that the culverts will be removed and replaced with a new bridge. A site plan showing the approximate exploratory soil boring locations is presented in Figure 2 following the text of this report. A description of the field investigation and the exploratory soil boring logs are presented in Appendix A. Appendix B contains a guide to aid in the development of earthwork specifications. The recommendations in the text of the report have precedence over the general specifications in the appendices. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This investigation was conducted to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site, to develop geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in the.design of specific construction elements, and to provide criteria for site preparation and earthwork construction. Our scope of services was performed in general accordance with our proposal for this project, dated October 16,2012(Proposal Number G12-176WAK) and included the following: • Test boring layout plan, comprehensive boring logs including soil stratification and classification,and groundwater levels where applicable; • Foundation recommendations for bridge abutments or culvert placement; Offices Serving The Western United States 1230 Finn Hill Road,.Poulsbo,Washington 98370•(360)598-2126•Fax:(360)698-2127 KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No.2 • Soil parameters as they apply to bridge and culvert development; • Allowable foundation bearing pressure, anticipated settlements (both total and differential), coefficient of horizontal friction for footing/abutment design,and frost penetration depth; • Recommendations for seismic design considerations including site coefficient and ground acceleration; • Recommendations for the use, placement, and compaction of on-site soils and imported fill materials for the bridge and surrounding pavement areas;and, • Compaction requirements for subgrade and various pavement layers. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Current plans indicate that the existing culverts will be removed and replaced with a new bridge. The current plan shows that the bridge will consist of precast concrete deck panels. The proposed bridge is 45 feet in length and 27 feet in width. The bridge is planned to be set on precast concrete abutments, founded on structural fill extending to native load bearing soils. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located in a Dosewallips State Park access road near Brinnon, Washington. The project includes a planned bridge to replace an existing stream culvert. The general location of the site is shown in the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. There is a wooded area to the west of the site and a landscaped campsite area to the east. The ranger station driveway is located slightly northwest of the subject area. The ground surface of the site is only slightly elevated around the creek and roadway. Twana Creek flows southeast through the existing culvert and through a wooded area, eventually emptying into the Dabob Bay inlet of Hood Canal. The paved road that crosses the creek provides access to campsites and other park facilities. GEOLOGIC SETTING The site lies within the central Puget Lowland. North of Olympia,Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances and retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial sediments. The Geologic Map of Washington — Northwest Ouadrant prepared by Joe D. Dragovich, et al (Washington Department of Natural Resources - Division of Geology and Earth Resources, 2002) indicates that the vicinity of the proposed bridge alignment is underlain by Quaternary alluvium (Qa). Quaternary glacial till (Qgt)is mapped nearby on the hillside to the south. Alluvium is sediment that is Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No.3 deposited by streams and rivers. Glacial till generally consists of an unsorted, compact mixture of sand, gravel,clay and silt deposited and over-ridden by a glacier. Our explorations generally encountered native soils consisting of loose silty sand and soft silt overlying very dense gravel and sand as well as hard silt and clay. The loose/soft native soils were interpreted to be alluvium and lacustrine deposits. Very dense gravel and sand as well as hard silt with clay were encountered below the soft material. We interpreted the very dense material to be glacial drift, and the very stiff to hard silt with clay was interpreted to be glacially-compacted lacustrine deposits. FIELD INVESTIGATION Two (2) geotechnical borings were completed to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the proposed construction area. The borings were completed on November 19, 2012 with a truck-mounted drill rig from Environmental Drilling, Inc. The depth of the soil borings were approximately 24 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). A licensed geologist from Krazan was present during the explorations, examined the soil and geologic conditions encountered, obtained samples of the different soil types,and maintained logs of the explorations. The soils encountered in the exploratory borings were continuously examined and visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Representative samples of the subsurface soils encountered in the geotechnical explorations were collected and sealed in plastic bags. A more detailed description of the field investigation is presented in Appendix A. SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils encountered in the borings were generally consistent with the mapped geologic units, primarily consisting of glacial deposits. Some areas of undocumented fill and roadway base course were encountered overlying the native soils on both sides of the roadway. The following paragraphs present a brief description of the soil conditions encountered in each of the borings. For more detailed information the boring logs should be reviewed. Exploratory boring TC-1 was located on the west side of the roadway,north of the culvert pipes. In the near-surface, TC-1 encountered approximately 1.5 feet of crushed rock base course that extended to the shoulder of the road. Below the crushed rock,the soil boring encountered approximately three and one- half feet of loose to medium dense gravel with silt and sand, which was interpreted as undocumented fill. The fill was underlain by loose silt with sand and gravel to a depth of approximately 11 feet below ground surface (bgs). Below the silt, from approximately 11 feet bgs to approximately 16 feet bgs, the soil boring encountered very dense gravel with sand. Underlying the very dense gravel and sand, the soil boring encountered hard silt with clay and fine sand to the total depth explored at approximately 24 feet below current grade. We interpreted the hard silt with clay materials to be native, glacially compacted lacustrine deposits. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No.4 Exploratory soil boring TC-2 was located on the east side of the roadway, south of the footbridge and north of the existing culvert. In the near-surface, TC-2 encountered approximately one foot of crushed rock that extended to the shoulder of the road. Below the crushed rock, the soil boring encountered approximately three feet of gravel with silt and sand, which was interpreted as undocumented fill. The fill was underlain by loose and saturated silty sand with gravel to a depth of approximately 12 feet bgs. The loose silty sand with gravel was interpreted to be native alluvium. Below the alluvial soils,the soil boring encountered very stiff to hard silt with clay to the total depth explored at approximately 24 feet below current grade. We interpreted the hard silt and clay materials to be native, glacially compacted lacustrine deposits. For additional information about the soils encountered, please refer to the logs of the exploratory soil borings in Appendix A. GROUNDWATER The exploratory soil borings were checked for the presence of groundwater during drilling operations. Groundwater seepage was encountered in boring TC-1 at a depth of approximately 5 feet below ground surface (bgs), and again at approximately 13 feet bgs. Groundwater seepage was also encountered in boring TC-2 at a depth of about 5 feet below the existing ground surface and at approximately 13 feet bgs. It should be recognized that water table elevations may fluctuate with time. The groundwater level will be dependent upon seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use, and climatic conditions, as well as other factors. Therefore, water levels at the time of the field investigation may be different from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Erosion Concern/Hazard: The Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) maps for Jefferson County indicate that the site is underlain by Belfast Silt Loam (Bg). Hoodsport—very gravelly sandy loam (15 to 30 percent slopes) (HoD), is mapped on the nearby hillside to the south of the site. The Belfast soil type is located in relatively flat terrain has a slight potential for erosion in a disturbed state. The Hoodsport soils have a severe potential for erosion when exposed. It has been our experience that soil erosion potential can be minimized through landscaping and surface water runoff control. Typically, erosion of exposed soils will be most noticeable during periods of rainfall and may be controlled by the use of normal temporary erosion control measures, i.e., silt fences, hay bales, mulching, control ditches or diversion trenching, and contour furrowing. Erosion control measures should be in place before the onset of wet weather. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 5 Seismic Hazard: The site class per Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code (2009 IBC) is based upon the site soil conditions. It is our opinion that Site Class D is most consistent with the subject site soil conditions. For seismic design of the structures based on the seismic provisions of the 2009 IBC,we recommend the following parameters: ISeismic Item Value IBC Reference Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Site Coefficient Fa 1.000 Table 1613.5.3 (1) S, 1.373 Figure 1613.5(1) SMS 1.373 Section 1613.5.3 SDS 0.916 Section 1613.5.4 Site Coefficient R. 1.500 Table 1613.5.3 (2) Si 0.562 Figure 1613.5(2) SMI 0.843 Section 1613.5.3 SDI 0.562 Section 1613.5.4 Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high groundwater table. The medium dense to dense sand and gravel soils interpreted to underlie the site at depth are considered to have a low potential for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the site is compatible with the planned development, provided that our geotechnical recommendations are included in the project design. Our explorations indicated that the site is underlain by approximately 4 to 5 feet of undocumented fill. Below the undocumented fill, the geotechnical borings encountered a layer of soft/loose soils, approximately 6 to 8 feet thick. Competent, load bearing native soils were encountered approximately 10 to 12 feet below the existing ground surface. We recommend that any surficial organics, undocumented fill and soft/loose soils be stripped to expose the underlying very dense/hard native soils. The very dense/hard native soils should provide adequate support for the bridge foundation. Footings should extend through any organic soil, loose soil, or undocumented fill and be founded on structural fill extending to the competent load bearing native soils. Based on our explorations, the very dense/hard native soils should typically be encountered Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No.6 approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) feet below the ground surface near the existing culvert. Thicker layers of soft/loose soils could be encountered in the unexplored areas of the site. The soils encountered on this site are considered moisture-sensitive and will deteriorate easily when wet. We recommend that construction take place during the drier summer months, if possible. If construction is to take place during wet weather,additional expenses and delays should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the need for placing a blanket of rock spoils to protect exposed subgrades and construction traffic areas. The non-organic, granular on-site soils could be used as structural fill provided the moisture content is near optimum and they could be suitably compacted to specifications. This will depend on the moisture content of the soils at the time of construction. Krazan and Associates should be retained to determine if the on-site soils can be used as structural fill material at the time of construction. Site Preparation General site clearing should include removal of vegetation; trees and associated root systems; wood; existing utilities; structures; rubble; rubbish; and undocumented fill. Any remaining soft/loose areas that may affect construction traffic should be over-excavated and replaced with granular structural fill. If earthwork is performed during the drier months of the year, additional work and over-excavation may not be necessary. Site and condition specific recommendations should be provided by the geotechnical engineer during construction. During wet weather conditions, typically October through April, subgrade stability problems and grading difficulties may develop due to excess moisture, disturbance of sensitive soils and/or the presence of perched groundwater. Construction during the extended wet weather periods could create the need to remove wet disturbed soils if they cannot be suitably compacted due to elevated moisture contents. The on-site soils have significant silt content and are considered moisture sensitive and can be disturbed easily. If over-excavation is necessary,it should be confirmed through continuous monitoring and testing by a qualified geotechnical representative. Soils that have become unstable due to excess moisture may require drying to near their optimal moisture content before compaction is feasible. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material during extended periods of dry, warm weather (typically during the summer months). If the soils cannot be dried back to a workable moisture condition,remedial measures may be required. General project site winterization should consist of the placement of aggregate base and the protection of exposed soils during the construction phase. It should be understood that even if Best Management Practices (BMP's) for wintertime soil protection are implemented and followed, there is a significant chance that moisture disturbed soil mitigation work will still be required. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 7 Any buried structures encountered during construction should be properly removed and backfilled. Excavations, depressions, or soft and pliant areas extending below the planned finish subgrade levels should be excavated to expose firm undisturbed soil, and backfilled with structural fill. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with structural fill. A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to observe, test and evaluate earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service, as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction and stability of the material. The geotechnical engineer may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations, contained in this report, are predicated upon the assumption that earthwork construction will conform to the recommendations set forth in this section and in the Structural Fill section of this report. Foundations The proposed bridge may be supported on a foundation system bearing on structural fill extending to the very dense or hard native soils. Based on our explorations, the very dense/hard native soils should typically be encountered approximately ten(10)to twelve(12)feet below the existing ground surface in the vicinity of existing culvert. Deeper areas of soft/loose soils could be encountered in the unexplored areas of the site. The soft/loose soils or undocumented fill encountered at the site should be over-excavated to expose suitable bearing soil. Spread foundations should be supported on structural fill, such as rock spalls or Controlled Density Fill(CDF)/lean concrete mix,extending to the native load bearing soils. To reduce the volume of extra excavation needed for the footing trenches and to simplify structural fill placement, it may be practical to place Controlled Density Fill (CDF)/lean concrete mix to fill the deeper footing trenches to the planned footing subgrade elevations. If CDF is used, the trench may be excavated only slightly wider(6 inches wider on each side)than the footing. If rock spalls or granular structural fill soils are used,the trenches would need to be widened on both sides of the planned footing a distance equal to one-half of the depth of the over-excavation below the bottom of the footing. Footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below the finished adjacent grade. Footing widths should be based on the anticipated loads and allowable soil bearing pressure. Water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. Footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches regardless of load. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavations prior to placing concrete. For foundations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot(psf)be used for the footing design for footings founded on structural fill extending down to the very dense/hard native load bearing soils. A representative of Krazan and Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 8 Associates should evaluate the foundation bearing soil. We should be consulted if higher bearing pressures are needed. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration wind and seismic loads. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Footing excavations should be inspected to verify that the foundations will bear on suitable material. For foundations constructed as recommended, the total settlement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlement should be less than Y2 inch. Most settlement is expected to occur during construction, as the loads are applied. However, additional post-construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated. It should be noted that the risk of liquefaction is considered low,given the composition and density of the native load bearing soils. Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.30 acting between the bases of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 225 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces (neglecting the upper 12 inches). The allowable friction factor and allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure values include a factor of safety of 1.5. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration,wind and seismic loads. Structural Fill Fill placed beneath foundations, pavement, or other settlement-sensitive structures should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in-place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. The area to receive the fill should be suitably prepared as described in the Site Preparation subsection of this report prior to beginning fill placement. Best Management Practices(BMP's)should be followed when considering the suitability of the existing materials for use as structural fill. The native soils are generally considered suitable for reuse as structural fill, provided the soil is relatively free of organic material and debris, and it is within ± 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. If the native soils are stockpiled for later use as structural fill, the stockpiles should be covered to protect the soil from wet weather conditions. We recommend that a representative of Krazan & Associates be on site during the excavation work to determine which soils are suitable for structural fill. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No.9 It should not be taken for granted that the on-site soils may be used as the sole source for structural fill (especially during winter construction activities). During wet weather conditions, the soils with higher silt contents will be moisture sensitive,easily disturbed,and may be difficult or impossible to compact to structural fill requirements. Furthermore, during the winter, soils typically have elevated natural moisture contents, which will limit the use of these materials as structural fill without proper mitigation measures. The contractor should use Best Management Practices to protect the soils during construction activities and be familiar with wet weather and wintertime soil work. An allowance for importing structural fill should be incorporated into the construction cost of the project (for wintertime construction this may be as high as 100 percent import). Imported structural fill material should consist of well-graded gravel or a sand and gravel mixture with a maximum grain size of 3 inches and less than 5 percent fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve). Alternatively, rock spalls or CDF could be used as structural fill. All structural fill material should be submitted for approval to the geotechnical engineer at least 48 hours prior to delivery to the site. Structural fill, as well as pavement base course material, should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness prior to compaction, moisture-conditioned as necessary, (moisture content of soil shall not vary by more than±2 percent of optimum moisture) and the material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. In- place density tests should be performed on all structural fill to document proper moisture content and adequate compaction. Additional lifts should not be placed if the previous lift did not meet the compaction requirements or if soil conditions are not considered stable. Temporary Excavations Based on our understanding of the project, we anticipate that the grading will be on the order of approximately 10 feet to 12 feet deep in planned foundation areas. For all temporary cuts that will extend deeper than 4 feet, the temporary excavations should be sloped no steeper than 1 H:1 V (Horizontal: Vertical)in the dense/stiff on-site soils,if worker access is necessary. All temporary cuts should be in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Part N, Excavation, Trenching, and Shoring. The temporary slope cuts should be visually inspected daily by a qualified person during construction work activities and the results of the inspections should be included in daily reports. The contractor is responsible for maintaining the stability of the temporary cut slopes and minimizing slope erosion during construction. The temporary cut slopes should be covered with plastic sheeting to help minimize erosion during wet weather and the slopes should be closely monitored until the permanent retaining systems are complete. Materials should not be stored and equipment operated within 10 feet of the top of any temporary cut slope. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 10 A Krazan & Associates geologist or geotechnical engineer should observe, at least periodically, the temporary cut slopes during the excavation work. The reasoning for this is that all soil conditions may not be fully delineated during the previous geotechnical exploratory work. In the case of temporary slope cuts,the existing soil conditions may not be fully revealed until the excavation work exposes the soil. Typically, as excavation work progresses, the maximum inclination of the temporary slope will need to be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Soil and groundwater conditions can be highly variable. Scheduling for soil work will need to be adjustable,to deal with unanticipated conditions, so that the project can proceed smoothly and required deadlines can be met. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, Krazan&Associates should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be taken and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. As a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: 1) Phase the soil,foundation, utility and other work, requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the wet season(generally October through April),but it should also be known that this may increase the overall cost of the project. 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. 4) Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited, other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 11 Testing and Inspection A representative of Krazan & Associates, Inc. should be present at the site during the earthwork activities to confirm that actual subsurface conditions are consistent with the exploratory fieldwork. This activity is an integral part of our services as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction testing and stability of the material. This representative can also verify that the intent of these recommendations is incorporated into the project design and construction. Krazan & Associates, Inc. will not be responsible for grades or staking,since this is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor. Furthermore, Krazan & Associates is not responsible for the contractor's procedures, methods,scheduling or management of the work site. LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. Our report, design conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly,from those indicated in this report. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. The findings and conclusions of this report can be affected by the passage of time, such as seasonal weather conditions, manmade influences, such as construction on or adjacent to the site, natural events such as earthquakes, slope instability, flooding, or groundwater fluctuations. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned,the conclusions in this report may not be valid. The geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations can be reviewed and reevaluated. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 12 Misinterpretations of this report by other design team members can result in project delays and cost overruns. These risks can be reduced by having Krazan & Associates, Inc. involved with the design teams meetings and discussions after submitting the report. Krazan & Associates, Inc. should also be retained for reviewing pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret this report. To reduce this,risk Krazan&Associates. Inc. should participate in pre-bid and preconstruction meetings,and provide construction observations during the site work. This report is a geotechnical engineering investigation with the purpose of evaluating the soil conditions in terms of foundation design. The scope of our services did not include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or atmosphere, or the presence of wetlands. Any statements or absence of statements, in this report or on any test pit log regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed are strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous and/or toxic assessments. The geotechnical information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geotechnical developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for any other site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. o-O-o Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA File No. 102-12020 April 27,2015 Page No. 13 If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at(425)485-5519. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. 4/27/15 O. R V^,4 QoF � y'MCpG or It- N 14!„.. " Michael D.Rundquist, P.E. Senior Project Engineer VC:MR:RN Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States VICINITY MAP pr ,' a ,•'. I ' # ,.r�mnon �yloti � , . , � \} r 4 V a� 7 n6 t •. L ` - ,e ': '+Ar ti's' _: ,4 114.v r'. F' t. .7"."% ,. kr 'N ' A����4' .,*'!'.:a of ■ O N " tG ,, ;24., x. `,.. r. 1 ,'a ` aa. S i lit aJ it I S 2 4 —306996 U S. `i,o,aBr nnon, WA A E � 101 ,, A ' C • (/) . ix)Ir ,.., ' d r/ Af 1 1 I Oh if i / V,. ft rj � �svzo ri nn // / O - ioi1 G ogle N Image C S, Geological Survey } 4 I G�x�C earth ., i i Imagery Date 914/2011 ' /4?'41'09.21" 1 i122 53'48 04"W etev 6 ft Eye ail 6223 ft �Kirazari & ASSOCIATES,INC° Twana Creek Restoration: Geotechnical Engineering Investigation tile Date: December, 2012 I Project Number: 102-12020 Drawn By: RN I Figure 1 Vicinity Map I Not To Scale Site Plan N (Not to Scale) EEE w j 3 ` J Np ri PPkI.t TAN ( l II\ RE JL v u. RFLOChTt BJI1:E9 ELEPHUNENI0 ELECTRI(1L LRJE5 AS C.7 I II NECESSARY t+.� \ � `'- I !,; '� I.,.ii{ `, t9a ,, ,..— =+ePtNHteRn;nN[ - - "�'.-' . '' rvJNU�ERt: i 7 * ;: lr iA / ` -�' d- f 4(2:4)--- rmn.rnm \ . . f.: �L�; : .. ista .ctl.LffiXk4114G. ■.,rvs1k":. . \ I J.,,\ r.._ /_..�. ".Ct1UR HCR.E fiEl r \\ � . MIN COLSCAT;; T.IIJINf tif,VER,V I4E4-'4.,t AND Pr,ntc Pr AO''..ii , \\_ EX ENT EXCAVATION \-- 4M11IItinP(X)rWrIc': J LX0 References:Site Plan based on an undated drawing by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission titled,"Dosewellips State Park-Twang Creek Restoration Project-Slte Plan I of 4". LEGEND -Ia L Z &ASSOCIATES, INC.(TC-1) Number and Approximate Twana Creek Restoration Project,Berman,WA Location of Soil Boring Date:February 2013 I Project Number: 102-12020 Drawn By:JGL I Figure 2 I Not to scale Appendix A Page A.1 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION Field Investigation The field investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploration program. Two(2)exploratory borings were drilled and sampled for subsurface exploration at this site. The depth of the soil borings were approximately 24 feet below ground surface (bgs). The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The depths shown on the attached boring logs are from the existing ground surface at the time the borings were drilled. The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration and, with supplementary laboratory test data, are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS). The drilled borings were advanced using a truck-mounted drilling rig. Disturbed soil samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) as described in ASTM D 1586. The Standard Penetration Test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch outside-diameter, split barrel sampler into the subsoil with a 140-pound hammer free falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer-blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the Standard Penetration Resistance, or N-value. The blow count is presented graphically on the boring logs in this appendix. The resistance,or"N"value,provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or of the relative consistency of cohesive soils. The logs of the exploratory borings are presented in this appendix. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Soil Classification USCS Soil Classification Major Division Group Description Gravel and Gravel GW Well-Graded Gravel Gravelly Soils (with little or no fines) GP Poorly Graded Gravel Coarse- <50%coarse Grained fraction passes Gravel GM Silty Gravel Soils #4 sieve (with>12%fines) GC Clayey Gravel <50% Sand and Sand SW Well-Graded Sand passes Sandy Soils with little or no fines #200 >50%coarse ( ) SP Poorly Graded Sand sieve fraction passes Sand SM Silty Sand #4 sieve (with>12%fines) SC Clayey Sand ML Silt Fine- Silt and Clay CL Lean Clay Grained Liquid Limit<50 Soils OL Organic Silt and Clay(Low Plasticity) >50% MH Inorganic Silt passes #200 Silt and Clay sieve Liquid Limit>50 CH Inorganic Clay OH Organic Clay and Silt(Med.to High Plasticity) Highly Organic Soils PT Peat Relative Density with Respect to SPT N-Value Coarse-Grained Soils Fine-Grained Soils Density N-Value (Blows/Ft) Density N-Value (Blows/Ft) Very Loose 0 -4 Very Soft 0- 1 Loose 5-10 Soft 2-4 Medium Dense 11 -30 Medium Stiff 5-8 Dense 31 -50 Stiff 9- 15 Very Dense >50 Very Stiff 16-30 Hard >30 11( GaZa.rZ & ASSOCIATES,INC. Twana Creek Restoration Project,Brinnon,Washington Date: February 2013 I References: Drawn By:JGL l Figure 3 l Project Number: 102-12020 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING TC-1 PROJECT:Twana Creek DATE:11-19-12 PROJECT NO.: 102-12020 PAGE:1 of 1 LOGGED BY: RN SURFACE ELEVATION: CONTRACTOR:Krazan/EDI BORING TYPE: Hollow Stem Auger SAMPLE METHOD:Split Spoon,SPT LOCATION:Brinnon,WA WWJ � W = �.., N-VALUE(GRAPH) Natural Moisture _ d. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION V W a W Ill e 7 l7 70 �o e- w 3 o v, z N 10 20 30 40 10 (Percent)30) 40 'y...y... . 1 1 _._..1_.._.1.__..l _l.._._.. Road Fill Crushed rock and gravel with silt and sand(fill). _...y...y j 8 13 II y..y... - Silt with Sand and Gravel (ML) - Soft silt with sand and gravel, brown, saturated. 2 5 II 2 10— ?:a°a: Gravel with Sand (GVV) Very dense gravel with sand, dark brown, moist. .f"' .09.4 RI. 50 1 :0. l 15—a:-4., L S Silt(ML) - Hard silt with clay and fine sand, gray, moist. — bop) 11 , 20— 9- 15 34 II ■ 19 25— End of Exploratory Boring i I 30— Water Level Initial:Y Final:I Water Observations:GW at 5-7 feet;heavy rain and sheetfow input. Notes:Soil boring completed at 24 ft below the ground surface on 11/19/12. Creek nearly to flood stage;samples partially wetted in places. KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING TC-2 PROJECT:Twana Creek DATE:11-19-12 PROJECT NO.:102-12020 PAGE:1 of 1 LOGGED BY: RN SURFACE ELEVATION: CONTRACTOR:Krazan/EDI BORING TYPE:Hollow Stem Auger SAMPLE METHOD:Split Spoon,SPT LOCATION:Brinnon,WA j z J N-VALUE(GRAPH) Natural Moisture x w ,� N Content = y MATERIAL DESCRIPTION U— my III III w ai Q Jo m ?r ¢ 10 20 30 40 10 (Percent)30 40 y...y... Road Fill y_y_ " Crushed rock and gravel with silt and sand (fill). y_.y... y-.y .,...,.... = 2 3 8 I I ,,...y... = Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) ± 5— r'i.0::'.<' Loose, silty sand with gravel, brown, saturated. ■ 5 6 I I 10� Silt(ML) 22 I Hard silt with clay and very fine sand, gray, moist. 24 50+ 36 15— - Silt(ML) Very stiff to hard silt with clay, gray, moist. 2 II10 ze 20— 2 i4 39 25 5 25— End of Exploratory Boring j 1 i 30— Water Level Initial:Y Final:I Water Observations:GW at 3-5 feet;heavy rain and sheetfow input. Notes:Soil boring completed at 24 ft below the ground surface on 11/19/12. Creek nearly to flood stage;samples partially wetted in places. Appendix B APPENDIX B EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL When the text of the report conflicts with the general specifications in this appendix, the recommendations in the report have precedence. SCOPE OF WORK: These specifications and applicable plans pertain to and include all earthwork associated with the site rough grading, including but not limited to the furnishing of all labor, tools,and equipment necessary for site clearing and grubbing, stripping, preparation of foundation materials for receiving fill, excavation, processing, placement and compaction of fill and backfill materials to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans,and disposal of excess materials. PERFORMANCE: The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. This work shall be inspected and tested by a representative of Krazan and Associates, Inc., hereinafter known as the Geotechnical Engineer and/or Testing Agency. Attainment of design grades when achieved shall be certified to by the project Civil Engineer. Both the Geotechnical Engineer and Civil Engineer are the Owner's representatives. If the contractor should fail to meet the technical or design requirements embodied in this document and on the applicable plans, he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by both the Geotechnical Engineer and Civil Engineer. No deviation from these specifications shall be made except upon written approval of the Geotechnical Engineer, Civil Engineer or project Architect. No earthwork shall be performed without the physical presence or approval of the Geotechnical Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Geotechnical Engineer at least 2 working days prior to the commencement of any aspect of the site earthwork. The Contractor agrees that he shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Owner and the Engineers harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, except for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner of the Engineers. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: All structural fill materials shall be compacted to a density not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557 as specified in the technical portion of the Geotechnical Engineering Report. The results of these tests and compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which satisfactory completion of work will be judged by the Geotechnical Engineer. SOIL AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS: The Contractor is presumed to have visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the contents of the data presented in the soil report. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Appendix B The Contractor shall make his own interpretation of the data contained in said report,and the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability under the contractor for any loss sustained as a result of any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from said report and the actual conditions encountered during the progress of the work. DUST CONTROL: The work includes dust control as required for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or the borrow area, or off-site if caused by the Contractor's operation either during the performance of the earthwork or resulting from the conditions in which the Contractor leaves the site. The Contractor shall assume all liability, including Court costs of codefendants, for all claims related to dust or windblown materials attributable to his work. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation shall consist of site clearing and grabbing and preparations of foundation materials for receiving fill. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: The Contractor shall accept the site in this present condition and shall demolish and/or remove from the area of designated project earthwork all structures, both surface and subsurface, trees, brush, roots, debris, organic matter, and all other matter determined by the Geotechnical Engineer to be deleterious. Such materials shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from the site. Tree root systems in proposed building areas should be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet and to such an extent which would permit removal of all roots larger than 1 inch. Tree root removed in parking areas may be limited to the upper 1Y2 feet of the ground surface. Backfill or tree root excavation should not be permitted until all exposed surfaces have been inspected and the Geotechnical Engineer is present for the proper control of backfill placement and compaction. Burning in areas, which are to receive fill materials, shall not be permitted. SUBGRADE PREPARATION: Surfaces to receive Structural fill shall be prepared as outlined above, excavated/scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture-conditioned as necessary, and compacted to 95 percent compaction. Loose and/or areas of disturbed soils shall be moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent compaction. All ruts, hummocks, or other uneven surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill material. All areas which are to receive fill materials shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the placement of any of the fill material. EXCAVATION: All excavation shall be accomplished to the tolerance normally defined by the Civil Engineer as shown on the project grading plans. All over excavation below the grades specified shall be backfilled at the Contractor's expense and shall be compacted in accordance with the applicable technical requirements. FILL AND BACKFILL MATERIAL: No material shall be moved or compacted without the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer. Material from the required site excavation may be utilized for construction site fills provided prior approval is given by the Geotechnical Engineer. All materials utilized for constructing site fills shall be free from vegetable or other deleterious matter as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Appendix B PLACEMENT, SPREADING AND COMPACTION: The placement and spreading of approved fill materials and the processing and compaction of approved fill and native materials shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. However, compaction of fill materials by flooding,ponding,or jetting shall not be permitted unless specifically approved by local code,as well as the Geotechnical Engineer. Both cut and fill shall be surface compacted to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer prior to final acceptance. SEASONAL LIMITS: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled while it is frozen or thawing or during unfavorable wet weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until the Geotechnical Engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed fill are as specified. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States ,,..,, . a x ,, i o z z �� x^oo Z z 1 a w&�p� g 6 at a x < r4 F g >oo y vu cn in CL 111 u S 4 / / ° ' ,o U_ ./ 0 r, , i / t =ECw F'''''l > >s C6 b .lib''.nom � p---74' ,-7-7---,-.--' ,.., ,,,,w-A. i .?, : \\'' r - -----7-\\_, ,, „-__\ ; X \ m _; ,,,,;,,,,,_::,__ . I a J G � `` f J/ � J a / 'J� / " hQ ,g xT / F '` > a ., m � � J / � / F/. a- a9 m n g n—/ � y ♦♦0■ _' n TTTG wF K � ` a LL == f 1 \ i � 1 /yy N. ,4ww°i:i:ii : �.a r� df�r ¢ - ( f �� ` / / / _4' �t - / y QLL.i` 1 � & , O w z- \ .� - d� / zWla /J , 0' o_� 2a ¢</J a ' ///, 0 <z4 Way b. 4 w _. §W8V N2>K g❑ ,' E 5 \V ,', n r- /V. it ° ''O� � y o¢ 2,r J o ,,, o a° - ztn 4s gy /1/; 4. - w z 8 N - . �• .'/ ✓r z 4. w wa z 5 6 '' w o W p / ' a 2, r i m m ' a s f_ I w w I I I 1 I w �y ON ?.,''' N 3 ',,i, Donna Frostholm From: Linda Atkins Sent: Wednesday,April 15, 2015 11:34 AM To: Petersen, Deb (PARKS); Donna Frostholm Cc: Arny Stonkus; Hinton, Douglas (PARKS); Kirkwood, Rob (PARKS) Subject: RE: Dosewallips Twana Cr project - drainfield decommissioning Deb, I made a site visit yesterday and have some concerns about the location. The site where the soils from the drainfield will be disposed of and treated must meet both vertical and horizontal separation requirements. The site does meet horizontal separation req. from the river but I will need to have test holes in the area to verify if it meets the necessary 3'of vertical separation. I spoke with Doug at the site and described what I need to see. He said he can do it next week so we set a date for April 24th at 1pm. I explained that if he finds ground water at less than 3'from the surface of the ground another location will need to be found. He mentioned another upland location near a borrow pit. Not sure where that is. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County cvvFmErrJAllrr harlce, This e-mail message, including any attachments is For the sole use of the intended reripi ent(s) and may contain confidential and privileged Lrformat ion, Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited !CVO!, ate not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message All email sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefor, subject. to the !Ville Records Act, n state law found at ROPY IL a6'. lnder the Public Records law the County mast release this c-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this c-mail unless it is also exempt Item disclosure under stato law, including al 42..56. From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) Imailto:Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent:Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:15 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Linda Atkins; Arny Stonkus; Hinton, Douglas (PARKS); Kirkwood, Rob (PARKS) Subject: Dosewallips Twana Cr project-drainfield decommissioning Hi Donna, Linda Atkins asked me to send you the attachments above regarding the decommissioning of the drainfields at Dosewallips State Park for the Twana Creek fish passage project. Attached above is the letter from Ed Girard, SW Region Manager, stating the closure of the restroom if necessary, prior to the Twana Creek project construction; the treatment plan for the drainfield spoils, and the map(s) showing the location where the spoils will be treated. Linda indicated she would go inspect the spoils site next week. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Deb Petersen, Environmental Planner WA State Parks& Recreation Commission 360.902.8634 1 Donna Frostholm From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) <Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:15 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Linda Atkins;Amy Stonkus; Hinton, Douglas (PARKS); Kirkwood, Rob (PARKS) Subject: Dosewallips Twana Cr project - drainfield decommissioning Attachments: Drainfield spoils treatment plan.docx; Signed letter to Jefferson Co Health for drainfield decommission.pdf; Dosewallips drainfield spoils mapjpg Hi Donna, Linda Atkins asked me to send you the attachments above regarding the decommissioning of the drainfields at Dosewallips State Park for the Twana Creek fish passage project. Attached above is the letter from Ed Girard, SW Region Manager, stating the closure of the restroom if necessary, prior to the Twana Creek project construction; the treatment plan for the drainfield spoils, and the map(s) showing the location where the spoils will be treated. Linda indicated she would go inspect the spoils site next week. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Deb Petersen, Environmental Planner WA State Parks& Recreation Commission 360.902.8634 1 Dosewallips State Park Twana Creek Fish Passage Barrier Removal and Stream Restoration Drainfield Removal—Spoils Treatment Plan March,2015 Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission is proposing to correct a fish passage barrier and restore stream habitat on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park. A new flood plain channel will be constructed adjacent to Twana Creek. This new channel construction will require that the two drain fields between camping sites 21-30 and 1-10 be decommissioned and the spoils removed and treated at a location approved by the Jefferson County Environmental Health Division. All material that is removed from the drainfield that has come into contact with waste water will be treated/decontaminated at a location on Dosewallips State Park property(see map). The material from the drainfield will be removed and hauled by dump trucks where it will be stockpiled for at least one year to allow for pathogen die-off. The material will be placed in 6"-8" lifts and spread with lime,then covered and protected with uncontaminated soil and straw. No surface water or wells are within 100 feet of the selected site. \\ — V _ -,-... = , te Park . . / Dosewallips .Sta . Drainfield Spoils Location •••••• r Lo,,•••• ,! •." •-•••••:.•••'-':::: 4000,„1.• ■bzls‘ •I z 7-----/;;;•.•.:::•...:: 11 I t : ;° .••••••••=:".*::::•;-•* ! --- IL______________ _.__, ,( ,,....•:::•••••••••••.•: ; ,1 /•*:-::-":•:•-•%*•:- II , 1•:•••• •- -.!t:•••" • — • 0.• 1 / -N.,____,..,.14111.11rAlir Ito • 41 • h'..-:--::::..:.::::: ' ! 1 ii ,004"--.... ."-__ g . ,. `"-;-7,:_f;:::•:::.:-......;::::::: 1 • *- --''.------- --24`)?*-Z::E.2.-' ,,,_,------i i 1 1%, 404..4::::L..1; 1".r -1; L----;L;...41 • • - - .,, ._„.--- ..... .-t. ,` School • ' • .--:--•-•:: *•::::•:: , ..... .• r ', '‘,_,........--$.---" • . ,.A_ _ • ... dil it., ..:;.-:- . . . _ , . • .... 0 , i 1 i • 1 ... . 1 • . WIIIIML r ._ - .. - _ - - - -1----... % ./ : .;`•,:-.•:. ..,... ......v....... N) ! • - • . . allr . ' \ , , ., . .. , „1/4„. • , - •- , • ti. ,--0_,.. ) . -;---1 i \ v....J. 0 \\\:„.,...\: , AN DO S4A LLIP44 Drainfield Spils Liocation?-",; I • ) ! \ T.::'5 =Z■. S T A TE - approx im a t el y 100 ft x 1 60,1177.4,,_ i '\ ; / t . . 4 i ,j DDsewallips ,-. ,- s‘ ),r. : PARK so: ' 7.251,1 r= ‘ \\ 2 if . it! :..„ „.. !I . -......,,,i it. , •-. . , . , 4'0 /: •..... ..„.... . \ ....:......, . . , . - ::::......,......,,,„ . . , iiiO4_-•:. - . . \,. % • • , ? . , . 40440.0 ../,' ,./. • . • c., ) N 'Pr° 500 1 000 2 000 Feet --: .. --•,: .. i. .. J 1 ii '' i-' I . . ,,.. --..._ ,,,, !..I.'2312 NEticrel Secgrac,•icScdet., . 1., STAT; nit 4/ tIr4V Don Hoch y`MP Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Road S.W. •P.O. Box 42650.Olympia,WA 98504-2650•(360)902-8500 TDD Telecommunications Device for the Deaf:800-833-6388 www.parks.wa.gov Linda Atkins, Environmental Health Specialist Jefferson County Public Health,Environmental Health Division 615 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms. Atkins, This letter is to confirm that Washington State Parks, if necessary,will close the restroom that is located adjacent to the Twana Creek Fish Passage Barrier Removal and Stream Restoration project at Dosewallips State Park,prior to beginning any ground disturbing work or alteration of the water course in or around the identified sewage drain fields. At this time,a new sewer system is being installed at Dosewallips State Park and is expected to be up and running in May or June of 2015. Once the new sewer system is operating,the lines from the septic tank to the two drain fields being decommissioned during construction of the Twana Creek project will be sealed off so that no sewage will be entering the drain fields. State Parks intends to leave the existing septic tank in place in order to contain sewage in case of an emergency shut down of the new sewer system. If for some unanticipated reason the new sewer system is not operational at the time State Parks is prepared to start construction on the Twana Creek fish passage barrier removal project,Parks will close and lock the restroom between the campsites 21-30 and 1-10 prior to beginning the Twana Creek Fish Passage project. I've attached a map showing the proposed disposal site for the drain field spoils and the proposed treatment plan at that site. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank • i ` d card, SW Region anager WA State Parks and Recreation Commission Ed.Girard(parks.wa.gov 360.725.9781 . . . . ••.:.. t::::) iv 1 ; i: . .*1 4 ?'' i B r f P „.. 2 , t ,, ,,,. . P' tri wir Crin 1 ; w.-,' EF, , ' c--1 f. , . • • '1% Z z td it. PZ ..:..a." .... . ti . . . . ' ti"."1 11 il *tt .: )10 t . to . -- • - • . . .. . 340,::::._.4.40''...-41"4". 7. v • ; : 6 m v...;Af-Ampimigw4steit.alLie_ , - M. 41111L4111V;:.:,:rifrit:.::eem Aillig—. ' 4" P3 Cie) Pl.m""11 \=1101 , . ,71.6"141'.1tPL-_.416ritilhs: .,.74..c: iiWei ' iiihii.. '' SOPArtf.,04142110-14 • . . f,...,„ ii.ot ,, iiiier . ...a...ANSA cir NI ,r5 0 rri 7- r i m • Con ( If i ..„. , .. ,0 „, Ca) H 1 0 , i 1. I \'./ ik- * ' , i„,:?,.!.?-::'.. liNt 8 NI 0 >. P g '$' a / ' ,t. 0 111 '',.'- • i ' .. il 0 !'-'' „a-1 lti ;c----- ----:. 1: ,.0.,' 1 ....,.17:ig:',.:'''''4.'''' I ' ,..,, , 6.'11.7111 Ailfi''r6 '''7'. '.: 1 El ''.1 jai 4 / .4. 4,.....4..... r -- ...da...... .0 .1 - . I :„ l'cl° W' ---*1 , - ' ' ; °*4.41.4-''''''-'.-- \ , ' fte7 1 • • . .. -1 -14.• b q Oimiami lilt . >11* P 40.00e1,'''l -: 1 :: °, • .. z P 0 I . ' - - I C000 c 4: :. -5- i p ''''"i 0 0 0 1 1 b lit —7"-- 4 0 0 ..--,) 7'44 C4 • y-,. :-•-.e.;:, --;,,.1 ' 4 •t' ' -.1 • L ,AV't'.Q.1, .:,, .1:,%. ,.,-::, ,....„,... . i 4-.. ."'' . '-f::.:::-;;;%.‘,. ,',.-..,`• ' . ' - 41,i,yoz_. , cm \ CI , , a Y. N !V, N P3 ''..i 8 5 "4 8 5 !I: r d 7; 't7,1 'III 8 •-4 4,1) cm e n (A a% w rq CI • 4 .+,. : 0 , .... '1/4*"' ' . •7 ... / ; ...... . ._ .....‘'' X :°:?.•. ‘ . ' V' '. . A° ° C 4,:,e.,:,., ,,:' L,i Ari.:-0..7.,,..7....... .-, H n 53 WI A WI PI WI 8; 'A A A E 4 4 4 4 ..! i R 0 .r, 9 :4 : (.11(4 j,, 1 " -.4 • ,,. .:-,,--- „ \ • . . . , .., . . N: .. • . .. , . . (7 g s s 41 . v: .• 'N''. % zzzzzzzzzzzz04 _ 6?) 2 i fE-D c;. 2) i oz xi= , rri i zzzzzzzzzzzz z 71 71 71 71 -14, ..P., 41■ -11* ''' 7 iiii. NC r 110" z oPPPPPPPPPPP Li 0 o - ' rr, GO fJJ NJ NJ NJ HA 0* 04 0* a (II ImAl S z 2, LT-11 >, 1 C7 x '; xi z = f..,,■ ' - -74) -0 b-, , . .....; lr-, .r- ni oz _• • 4 IL k t ) , . .' ... 1 PAsolf ■ 4161401000141d .40/40A1111111 r , . • .0.1 ••• IIC 114o-011t4 •UN, - "'- .po -.:. A Z lk •;: A . i.:..:, Z Z .... 2 0 0 g Efi ! 4 6 I g 1 6 Vz 6 0 8 li3 E ..: if I- i g E ,g, i.. / ') i. ... ! fill „...,. -....;--- •takt 2. Isow 3 4 t 1,0 g * 0 LL L'N Li- -- . — — LL,. . g ;f.,:,„.'''-\:-. .' W.::,;?..›.' 1 1 0 41 P ..... , , . z .,,. ..," N-,-V., ' , . , , , , . I ci IL -0---,...„-...,,,2-;,.;. ,,,4- „._. ,. . ....... , ,_, , , „,... t =.2 ,, , ,, ,„ hili w EN. in g i;) z z •-•:‘, -,4 ::,:•, - .• '''._ ,. . . A.-------- V 8 a IS , .. . .„.... - R , • ...:.--„,.,_ It r P 2 4( ig.''.. .. 4 .1- , . —,....- * 8 g t .k. ' ''Y ! k-- 11 g .p 5 i ... 0,. , tl d 1 1 °4 z g 1 g r > 7 .. ,,,,,, ill 8 r 2 4 1,..9 Lq g 8 3; L.L1 6 , g lt' ri ''... N ., Id / g 0 a . g li c, vt 0 , .„,..4 n \3...; ,,,,,/ • i w7 ... .N......i---4, 4.1-4 8 *i* S 5 re., /..., ---,...f. -...,.../. -- .; 0.7 0 kr 0 rti V . 1 i ..! M ),:: LO.ri a g 7 m E N , ,,... ,„,. //), z ...c. L i rd ,.. . E . . '...' i.. z .. ,......_, [ti :,--z 52 \ 1 1 1 g - 'Z' g : •— Ix -... _J ot ..... t; . 4 ''.. ...... C7 0 AVOW. '••••ti 1 .7_,,imigNIMEW O CI -N.., 6 * 1 L.. 8 R = IA IP 1 ANNr ' V I , . . = Li) R z.3 .IS' . ,/:/N,,•‹. .., ' ..---. 1 it.; ..........„ ......,.., 14, ifill --"milim”' 1; h E 4.1.a . ..: l`F.P r 'l••N 4 • P P P P • : ., P:P:b A,,,.. , . . ..i.p.t 'N R1111•11.1.,... .P*1111 1.11111111101, • •• • c. P le II 1 '' I • • • •• : •...11. '',...... 1.:lie -... ..,„-m—,- ___ Lig ,....„,.......i - wom4 1 70 . • " • ....t.r ,,,,........." E . ---- al M E2' . . • .t P 1.1 i a ••: :a.:-, •kit .i.* " 1t,, E-) 0 .. : sir A, 1 ' • • .' ,tt:r 1 --- ...- ...---- r" imm. . •• 1. ,.. ! , In 9) A ,• • A . . ••• . - r 'NY' P ') I . Kg..,,. . .. • . ....... . P. 0, ..• P P IP IP ...• . • 1,,P,P i i ...1;<:. .. : ; • , :1,:t \ 6 . 1 r .... H 8 ;* .1c •. . ...ill .1p .21 gily . ii iw 6 i W .. - P 4144:. 111' ■ P... y 2 pl g ... to • .414:4 tij r c... If \ \ \ g P 1 IK . . , 4, u y ,,•■ 1,4 ret V' t 2 a q 1 11, fl '4+ g .,,,gt x.. - xti t4 . * t 1 2 .m 1 2 4 - -,..1- ... -9....* e. ..i i --, to, .0 ... e :4 E :.;-.4 Q to c * 0.1.1‘4 S. S,... r, Li1i 1 , 1:1 6 1.#1 i ', . I R .- ,.. •,* t, E 17 t.'' R. # t t " 1 " •u ., 2 t i — vt• Ii. 5••••,., t u..; , 1.... - i t f 1„ IT "tt `NC ■••• .... Z i 1. ' .4 .i. , t 4.. . .....•••S IN Cl • 1 !: 7,-A si -1* : ,-- .4 --1-1 1 -a i , c c. 5 * t.1 .P.,R. 1) ,ig ., It -_. ..'q t4 a*'- " '''4- ..Z146, 't .. e -- ,.., .., . , ,... • tv:3 t -K t si -14 I '4 ti • i g....4 t g Z t *.m.,,,„ •-- .. 1 '1 gl-tx n" i' ZI ,m;e3...) II ig--4" .i a [ - -1-q- - 1.1--- .1.2 - 2 ,... , , .•. ...... . .. . V 0 •...1=E , - 4. 421 1.. ,.. 4 1:2. kl 141 I i2 4.-g" - i. Iii .-..„. -.1c1 H 1'1.1 I I -1 15.1 I I I I I I H I 1 1 1 1 ' , -1]1 .111 HE '1.z -- -* .; t 2 - al . .... t mr A z 4 . . . . 1-..a. .,,, ,ug 04 .,S p„.4.,gaw 4.. ze #.# g....... a • * a a a • a ,0 a t#1 * a • a * • • a • • #e a a — a a a * a i III t litil.,, t 4 -' " 4 . '' 04 , . • . . • • 6 t, 0. 3 -4' 8. 3' 2110, 62141;lki tvi."1. 0- 1z/ t 014f° 10 ..i3 , ,,„ta ?_,Iil .,..4 ,51 . isma 1 4 - i-ZI ler ! 9. 3 ' 3 4- r.i -s•E Ea 4 0 ' 1 "4 4 Ea- . tq firit - fll t341$ IN ig, 1,--rttig g; ' R44-9.elt. * ' 1 -,JZa Q 't aid ' t 1 1 A i*OlkliT. 4 -i-QQ . a- a .:?.. .1. ,t1s- `4.4' 9- izaq0 ( 54a..1i7t2 ga6Cit 1 a.s i 4 -"R"' ta. E " --, -12. A Z r` g11. ." 1• 2 " P76'4- -4 ''` T-Tc. -rt ..' : P E ti.94- 11315qP-“ 01 - fl :"A. " 4.4t..14 .1h-414 g &at?..ltd 'III 2 --, e14 '-' a- r - I 1 g. 01 ,, k1-0A,4- 2 qs.eol .0. 4ng0 ,4- 1-a) ,11-am. “ ' ....1- ..0.4'v■ •• -t .t-o_ '-i qg 0 ‘ 3t2-5Lret 2-i DAte, -AZg-ala .a .01ja R•4,Z .21 . "0- .iti _l. a,. g' g, 1/ 4 40 -1WOltj30L4 *13 1! r S .‘ 94$;1(a '2 '1 144S, * 5 'q '471 /14 11• Vitt-1' e. ,Zr", % -%?V-Irea.cc / e. 'rnetlu- t4 '9,:arti..ik ^/, 0, -Actisl l '41'' 412- , et b A - 4- '11 : 4! aultrIti -4 ic'-' ,. ;atli-,It i4 vl AL;.!-4 :flirlaiiI1 i: itl' il -°:-It14.11ii 40- it! 11 p4., ai-;; iVli qk -R.47; t6.g- -•-.5 a. 1 1 7•1. .14--" C1 .4- e ?Tv R. R-Z 55' 2t, a Ro.g qiR c, a ''.; 't t- i a .. 9- -.- 9.,-3 6q-k il i A-. se I g -.7,.., -- ; - a :-- 4.r- f:9r - l' a--%-41 .. - ' 4r .i .sc . -a -4 .1 ' liks .V3 1A.e. s et tn. 414 , z 03T' eza f ° z - _' ;14R ta 2a1 -"I ! T a 11 1 i --, 1 Zw . . € t..1 1.- t31 : 9' I - 4- -?- • k -eipa- at - ..*„ ft ■1, 4 ---1 iit'-1101 2At l' az A ! , zzil v „ .., , .6, • 4 t !I ti! }' I i wv 1 A129 %.,;, 1 , _ _ i 1-11-1 A- , --- _ , )g i221. - ; , _ Igi , -1. 0 I 'Pelt, ' g 14 ,q' ?;t0•41 Itilt-i-11 1 .., 2 k V -. Itit a t?..KZ 4, a , -,. I 4444 -0, , N ps51 .4 - z -yf 4atiOt;q -‘ 4-'il9'1 •.g 5 - 4N" vt r) ,kja 'D . ix , it 4 ,! ttlt a x •-1. 3 , 6 k -1 ...-.v..1A i. -- 1 - 4a.- -- ,i - c5,,,, - a-• Iltlif °' 1- atiii174 r OA 1- ,- teaa: - at - 5 i Iihtl A -- 0- ; 6 1g , 3 " 4 aA z Et v tz -=:-5. ,, n a I-- 1j. ,,, 4 - .• i a. " 3 a4Aa,:at7f2. ,-4 . 242fsai % 0' - W . qg.Q .11gr P tp, I .Y4k, -,.E,R .1. -% 0 zz'i 1,1'16. at --. .'iN. n2 . 0 I " 41PR ? * 2A il „ li' a •7' 141 011. -kttak ii • -•4 R1104 A 1z4-2,. " 1 F-11.-"AA' ' -, z 2' ut: i 71g9., .;1:-MT0, ' *,i1. 4,0 -A 0 i-3-15..tiZ 1 UP- 6-la °. Jte-74 2 1g' 1f0 - ;"gTT Sli5 ,1- glil ilq 6 i ,,g - ar.-01 z e la .• 1 101 ili 1-1 • s Ei ' Sjit z4 4tRa-1 1 % 5' .74 t1445-i 40g - 1 Ri 4.--7it 1A4t U?... ,o g..- ': ' a - , atva - i dl 1 . 4 461 1 „ `k2 10- 0 4* % tl %41- ltA,. e- - v i -i.12t - 01 sz 1, ( :,.> f •kil , g t t 2 3 V q TOtl& -112L '" V 3 lit , 1 4 4 . 1 :: Sr 9:4 a s i n a 1 - aIigliz !=- = t% - F.; -N2zale“5I1W11211311q ;u1 4I "itlif:11 !t! ii-111 ;irlailtiftiit aiii 4 s. 5.4, ? --. ._,i,-4 , - ,,, ig _ ig- p2A1-4•4, „aqua glo,; ( 3_,.. . 4 •.-6 Z ---,, 4. .- 1 ,,L v=1.9 ' 4 • ltz t. 4 i ,ittf Vira ;x af1.3 IteZISI 3i-- )- ',,ra ”3-°' SVI. . 1. , t A.74 .4 1g , -- A - -8 ,J, 't' * R Li kt tc" ail vll ' i 2-- -y0a5 43 ..ZarOZ- ' ,, 'g' t 4 - r- 1 a 1p4- --1 ' n itt4 3o --* a- - - i = t1 -It ar -.2 --2- , inte. . %. 1 t 2v.( . - a• a t it ° 4i-t ' /...1 .42 * i -6366 -- g. 133 t % 6. ... ,,,,, $•,,, i-!• 3 ,. .., a 1 S " 10 :. 9. . 4 2' ` tiJ ti°4- Y& -43- 1- A' "4- 141"* ° 11. tl-WO e21 °_, t1i43417fi4" 1. lu 41112La4 ZIR : WI 415 -414Att i7g g --441i "1 7114141g V fi'l 'tt4 'i . ;'.e 14Att 31 ,' it..-Ito : 4.... 43 tiki ' ha a5-14 ,- , g1t . 1Lt .r. ow i 2 ° .. --. ' 0 _..t •z1.- -. 2. qte * ." Z 3 t v --kt ,itg. rq E )0 k !c, -4-3.1. 0 1),_ .1 41 21 1. 4t2ii i 4a PS-4- 5-4.'30a : E- ° I 1 : I! ; k. a. . Iair . a- tpio . - - 1 - Prn ,. / .1'.. li to-,z21E-t4 1 Zg 3i- ,1, 3130-14. ,t RS ' Ea, 'g, r'- -" 1-' . 1f4e :Irlt -.1'.. '6' ' a . , z Ift. ;, 1 - y ,. .t 1 . 1 t . - Q r .5.:...-1 ,..-i. .g t •a .z Zi _ 11 -4-"T SCA:TI Ft - It. 4 1 - a it .`t 3 11 t 1 t 4 . I ma ti kr % % IT. 4fti ..'"- , n k4 5,14- Z 1`2 2- ipat 9 % Re -' a g a Z' 34' g ` 4 1 '4 41 ■ 2.4' g44 ‘ .., 1' 1 /111122'0I1541. _ 1 al ,...••••• ,, er P Vid0 'tIL V114 t i airj-tA % Zilq?li z42P/51-11211P-'; f11 ilf .i_.. tv 4 .- -,a? 1%11,9,4 - 1•% ?•- 4'. “ 07„,01: -.4a•%-ttg 41110•AT3n. ,1 El i r,..“10 "°-• ; .-1-4 '1 Q-7, t - 0 '3 ,4 e k ) ;14 -. zite . t. r... ; 47"., a _,.. tr. -40q -.• e 0 - , 71-., .-4._ a ig4 ° I.OIT ar 52- Ze f - a 11 t f ....a .-, -1 i 1-Z1 3b "1 : 31 ? .1,L ; RticAlarglAt51 St1 .g- .--:41 It. ',771-? -fi; 13 EiG ' .Z ., --. ° :'' rIQZ5 / za-- 1 ak °• te.epi i 4.1- la. t."‘ h..E.. ;24-4 11;16&,.. ftpol zr,,,../ 0 -,1 ? '4. laktill":14.1!..5113i9- -;11:211iiat ` 0. al z `-- 4'‘'-'1,3IX. -•=-1A ,a .9-4E,, a,• ': i.. k. 1. 'Ci" .1.0,1nra 4 n.lzn S. 1Stvatc, 4-1W, ! .2 3x ,„ 31r3v. Grl 4 , ,,,. & .3 -.... ., ri -- •.-- a "1- •,-.•-• g E4 •••• *-Es alW 9 es- = ( Zit- 3g z ; tr -13•^1-4 0 t -.' i',_ 11-, -, ;ZN, 9 w .41 ' 0 -i' 101,"44- e t/ t4. il 1.1 .1 i ! ' -f t .. 'm 4 rrrn 4 it" 3ZI ,_ , . ,5-_,. ... . c7 , g=... r . i 5h_ 1 r„ .0 icz.1 0 m 8 0 WI / A ! M 1 I 0 z g 0 * cn mp4 4 al i t i.- 6 qkS Z •• ,? a• 02 ..... .1 ° z 96 3; .:.:. 1.-. ■I% mil' .1,7 DM IM i Lt.,' .4.,*. ur nrrr,vorl 1 r pi li 5...-: i ., • rl ' Z ir". :: A -L ::,.. - ° ___ „ 0 a et E--4 ______I i 0 P fra * a c.)• c,,, ,, _ 1 n H. 5<- z `'.. „. 0 .rt 2 ril 11.1 a 0 C * '41 F., ! ill ! (*I 44 0 Il I _ , ' 41/".----°,7:--4k:".:.:04 -•-•°",,,...4,- ' 'a' ,.,-4,,''' e.r- .4. _ , :7-.A,- ......^- ....r'''. -- • 7,, ":„..--;-° , , ;„.,,;,... rIi A' ----r•'''°-...II;%''''''' ..- ;;” t..;,...r. :2II-' `'°..:'''''.... ..... I-1-•- --"I" 1I*A."V-i. I I"7"5405. $1./ •, - ._,AA-Jr':"°...4-'A. .,;- -„7 1 ;,, A: .`: ?' ,----A-A 2. °I°-' 1,;‘,„,„,,,.,*(_'.-..-.^'',k;' -,,,,. 7 ,* ; .... 5,-.. „„x-,,...A„.4-.A.,-,A.. _„,,,„II TI.- :-..°-. ..5m-'-L'' - "" __, '''- ';.', .---''c'''',-''',, ---`"t %• ', ;41'7''7'''."-1.-:'''°5-'-`'I'-' II' -, -F.' II--;.---"- - ' I U-d ..°,,7-ti„;10:7" ---17 :.;;.E--,:::-..--;-. ,,--,•. , 4 '\ -1'-'; - ' A''' -- ''' '' L'r:41 ''',57" (1() •I J I ' , \144 - : , -rk --!'-. .,:..7.",:,:7---4"-'---4- 4,----' ,,, -"4 4 Irc},..4 /i -.. —.,--'"4---",..- .., - lc; , it, ri,fi""", r■ , .,„o; M. 4 . I et RS I .w . I'''-;,,,,,,,y „..1,4,,,,,,I°rA4,I./,/''' _ , • .. i " '147• 5.; ",/ , . / • ,,:*„., .r,. •- „ .,.. .4__ '4 „..i.L...•7,,,-......._, 1,,, .(11'I I" -----4N,'''\ / ..!..,),---i— '----- -e", I 1 I441' Ili , , -1. \ k■ ,"4 —__,_ 's,, * . : ci - A r.,,, I ‘,, 2 ,„N-1 io. , 4 ,, \ .1t .1. , tt.. t ' , „,,,-,;, , eif t / '', .. / i r, 4 4 \, ; \ rz. .I,,,, I ; 1 I ;A k ,,,,.,,,% „, i .1 .. 1 - ,... . , ‘ -,4, , ....„....::, i.) '0 , , . ... .i--1 / ,...z...-':' ,d?v,T;4„,. ; -------7f5, , i , , , .1 \,„.--,--'%, ''''------.4: ii ',I /,-,'.4- / ,, Q ,e' ,, , , ,„ d„,,:-.:::::,,,,,,;:i--1,--.5--77E-1,. .i.i„. -„.... -,,,,,,,.,,- ,,,-„, -44 I , 40 .,,,s i, a /'" A '4- , ;o4.," ,.4.00"..;k'.`,I-",°* ." . rrI.I.I.I.I'l IV 1j OZ."--„)... ,,,,' // \ .#15,b,, ...4,.:,...,,,. Li .4 // 4' 4-14' ,0 ,,: /4 .7V9/ .;; / °el" --"" - - , '-'14444'46"141‘,44-. et .4 •'4:;4 5...44);" a 4 7 '-r;g -.I' r •••'Q k : i 41.va ,:livir0/..,,, ..:;,..p.--‘4. .-N,-, ,, .., .,., ....„ , i ....- - ki ., ;.,-:.,L.-- ''.'. .1 ' i 1,740klii4,19)0, le,— .,— '7 1,*:.,,r,' ' f,14,11.4'",.,,,*tsrif,,,:, ,... .:Ag;.l.0:',:,-;+:-'c''' , 0 .,,„..."---,, r r -,d/ ' ° ' i .A.,(5.I: .(1 ArI47,,II,;;;'1-,-;;;;;°,,..-.0, i '.'" - °1',/-4';..„.;:7„..;,./Ir,, , - ,. • / 418' •1tle /V ,,I,At / /,,, 4 -..."--- 1 gt.,,, 4. - # - ' , , ., c441r. e,..,i,,...,,,,,ILI klit ,,,,, :fitY c , , 4 /,,,---,,°//-- q , . v ..- 0 5 ,I,„..f..,:-....,_,A. „. .0), ..„ F 5 . if ,...:,,, ...,4...,--Ittritt-,t4z,t4 .,...' ,5,, ,,..i, xf,,. ,/,,IN.r,....„Ari.Arrr;-.:I'sr'=„:-....;„;;- .IR( ,,,,,,,,,try,y41 in,,, . A, " I/ .4*. i.,- __-... ,.;„**555.,.,:m /7'. A.-71,...;,,,..,°;.; ,,A/gArvi.,, E 'N-.,. pi , '''-, i ,/,.;,, 47 '.:.?1i'lyff 'i ' ''. ' 41/1 1 \ '-/ .,,, ,I,/id it'ATii„ta,, 40- ,.....;*,.„.t. ' r ..2 I - I „,,,. *,....:.e ::"'le: . ,p, , Te,7..,1”:;'.,,._._:.:_...;_._e-,,,:,_.iiz. iin7_L...,7:: ..,:::, n.,.,:trit i i,,p,.,,,,,.:1:I' 1 P.,,,;.),,s2 5:)!!: h' ,:?;I.:* ,rif ,,9,..:1V.1.4."-:$)."5::"C'e lee/Ij:",1(1 j.?-iiiii .4I'I .1' f":,k4; ' - ' c i 0,.. -C-":" 7,4 ''' 'el,e'',A. ;''. 7',:\ I ..,"..2„7.-7: ":":-II' " '4r I '..e:;7 I I -1 it"( - 11-"" -...., .„.„...- ',„ -4,:e :1°.A. - / /*tr4-0 :...-.--,-,:---..,_ .'4( ' .11./ 4 / ) , 6,., " 1 opitvi, /0 0 ..,...A.r,.,._ :, ____,.....z:z..„....1.7_, ,.....„:„ .k. ......_ , ,..:„,4,,,??J,i.,..,,i,„;:17..v ■it.'" nit' 4k W.4'7 , ,.,:;,:;:1*.„,/,,,j,rk„.„4 r. pi N/ fp...e. ,... . . I ;#fr.I.rl,IIII- r.,;I; ;;I;III°4 --='.=I- 77 * ,..„,-.‘°,P,:,.. .. it /- , i. .....,... ,.-., „fr"-- --- 4,4„„,„4,,,,,:. , .., 4 * ''''* '' .‘s':,;,,.,' „-.”. ,/,,:. ,,,, i,44,,,,,,,,,„-if ,,, 4 '1 ,,-'"' - ./ Ar/17 .. ..; i , 2, ix,e, ,, : :e{:;:411:,ite,'I';' ',774:,,,l' :/:-4/' $g -,,.. - ' ' - \ _6,41/4, „.,/„-,..... „ ,,..,,i , 7 „.. 1,,„ w , . , — ,,,-4 i', , - ' , - ,) f,i 4e/hp,"ee la rill ./..74. A -=--. , , __ , , fli ...-Ar. //r.-;,„ 4iffit 1 xr • ek- V# ,' i' „ , 03 ' 64 :1:! ,/ • , _ ; 04, ,fe 1 7,,,,e4 p 41 !)."1 if il ■ I ''4'f4 Il' f l'i '4' , .,, , 4: VV i i ,: = ,:k ,6,ekt ■ 1 - 4 „ 1. 9 1 ' / •/ ‘,4 4 ''I) ': ,.. 4' ' / •/ - . - • i i , • 5 9-;-,k,....:40,.„,- . ''-‘,. -r ;‘5 -- -i ,,,,:toz 1 f ,,-. 0, , ,ii- ,.• 71,..,., g --. ,„ • .1 4.-' ' ' ,,,,i. /,#,,,,,r2: --t+,;12 ''ItZ,.;47.7.",..,.„..,, _ i 11.14 i•e'•"-- ,;,_ ='",-„ 0— *"..t" g g g yr: • k7e'''', ...I j ,,,- ' 5 i Iti gia ._ 4 ..r.to ...„... .„k- , # .! .,"-4/ ,:t .,.,. s - .4„,,4.,-,.,,.- - ',-;`,f) i 17 2 i - .0. ..,./„,„ /'',„.„/i 1 t v., n ti w w o I-. ...„., -- - • - 1 ,•,„.„?"-.,,,,; „,,,,,,,,:,,J i I.k7 @ @ 0 fa , i, 5 ;(....--- i , 6 < N j,” II al w -Is . ,, , r., ,1-\,1 i rive/74; 1 I „.--,--- —t- ,, -- GZ ro. 8 ,,... ILI ..., „....„, 8 1.,.. ., i 41 ' lit ) . ,,...,-----,) 1\ / V r'°(' ' : '''''' ti, R ,411/ ; i ,.6.., 1111,,i„: [ r , , - ' Ili y Ill 41 r rn III c to «, r�(f � ! to 7 1 I ` r� r _, ,,. x /:( /�ryn� mm yy )g AS7 r G7 �1 g¢j¢ - r y� _ ., e F p m i 1 i. t/ r m s • EI!}P d f t 2 �. y - ,e�[ - y .. z- f s`°r n ' �,+.4 SI i ,' •`': „-"L r d' — ' f ' , t :f jjj m ,ri 'il a 5 1 , . 3 _. qtr �a n m pe , ,° ✓. - &. 'Ps'/ air ,f„ i , pR: t.tylfrif,,-,',:-`, „sit./...e . ''' i" 1 ---- ' ,. 4 . .It � 1 l� d f^ .–t/4 e , ''t n i r� � } Y -,a z .lr `s .{ z` f 3 , S " • � ` , /jd , '' -� f °'' r ,-,..),7;-'-'. "x t / T ,�" CA'',i0,,,./ / p r iW ) ' 4. Ai „it, "" �•' " t"r ,y i 1 r ;, i p 3 " � J > .` ir a 1,I #f' r l d f } r r x'.- .' fl f y I ° t _: �}{, aY.?a " , r r ' T,''''''''''- f ° .,– .P,/ 3+ ` 1 J k b '" ° f €�d per..,' r a , } �L `' ' : * ,: i i +} ce,� f � � ,/ r. y ,pi A Rp '7" Y CC °` 1 Y 6 K e Yv—+ j I / Pt-, .. V * ( � Lin .i.rj4.10. a ii i - yid. ' <�1 ps m ,6 1 L 1 °� ---r w T if ifs ." .e hi 4'r/' -'7.-'-''-i -- ., - - , 1 ' 4 / ,, lT r A yy ri .."Cl. c431 r; r —1 6 1 : i ° g c,;, - m c� Z id ! i' E 0 0 ill :,:i_____ �- Mt;. i�:ac rt, Slt Aa' :Y19 . tl- __ - �, e0� = k.., g 13i t.1 , . m g o-p ps i C7,: e." 1 _� k t • au 1 r i . M: _=,r' ."^ k "" .-.1.;;;040.' — - ' -,;."°e ra .r^" , r _ ..ten � .-✓ 7 ,r"-- 4` i 93 ^ }tq 1 - `? ' r „ ., "-"" •✓r" pil. V 5:14±,..,—;E:"--";':.—„,./ € `'� nx "` a "rte K VJ w z s..h. ; ;xx _ � r r �t F� W+T tr a t e; . _ . .'� y_ _p I µ° r fi f4`Y rx �`r ai°� a Z 9 t a y {` x 'f' 1' 1 i " '' i ! F. r Y i 1 % r am � in , ' 9 q, S 3 tar f °f° .r ,-1` .-w* . °! P f �` .° 'h., ; .4 t } m ' 1,t,414':'..?-;„, " tVa + T i° 4`? qj q -', i a y , `fi - R% r s ( "'"j. �} .e a ° * fi' r) I ''s k % t s ✓eisT } � � •f' {t d vy C ±$ fi }" . s ,f PFf ?Y. : ;° sf S$g qr .. 4 Iv ' - A . d{tip 1, T...q fl, Fi <'"{ ' K �M. .lI P�_ F X�p4 !4 '' � µ . F y p f ° �, _ .� I fs /, 1 , + ---i /"qy r. � . � kyr,,,,e-:.„.„..4:4./.----,-;:,,,,,,yc---- ,,,,j, 1 q, q ��Y+ • . ,y, '- *10..' 'r i `,+V ' 4.-�i ae n e p ' p 3 4' f /." frr )e 4� .rdy, y 't Jr,f' i ° '141. fr „F x F> °:e"'"*", tL h'• ` 'f : + a r 1 ; L C ‘,;e7// 1 Ii i _` ��SM12 k^s...d r Y .14:l P r `q y � �{4 " � I i, . .., 4 w� a , �.hi t'f I j ( F, �a may Y' t` /a 1 ••.�T I r I{`'F 1! +'i r .1 /7f _.,,4 }� i Tl�� - /'V € / =r °,,, ro # - '` � _"— �2`+ l' s r,0) rr�',r,'(eill,K1�i t ------'1( 2. ),)%4.1 S i it \ A ° J �N" 4; Y ex1.. I *' 1 � v, g j p f+l..t` 7 '".'" � ° f�` r' a c6� �7 t "i r T! R 1 ..-_,,,, , < . ', ,, -- -- 'toll < .,-..,,.;, -- , ., /it‘,i,,,(f a Kr r fiilllln a r c Ili vi.� iM y°s*E --_ rr - I# re;Rik a a / 0,11 t� _ i w' �" i y 1 orn -• # " fs� y -• w, ,, ' f f '" ilk } t 'i t �7 5 L ,. h( PO", { ' °gy m 7 v,* p ,,,,,,,.,..t.., ,,,-,..-- ,.....- ., -- ; i=,- . .. i •=4-0;12,,, ,, tk . ..,„-q.V4" ..":,.T44,0. lit...now / / ...., \ , ar 'r t.-r,..f. ,„- lb'tifg.ltitlat`t I 1 ' ' \ ; •i , -'" ;-' , "t V1,4 4,',"*. J1 - 1 , ., , I , , , • ,, 1 , , ....1,, 4 S 1‘ , "0 r '+' '-' .rt-- ' .— 1,3-50 7, •/''''. ., - 1 " .„/ '' ') 7,. 2 rcf, ,,, . , .. g Is\ , r , tttt: ', jai 2“ 9 , -6-,--- 6 ' -, __.' 1 ea 4 ' , A d - 1ff . . - '' ..*°'''''''''''''''' 141'''''t ..I! , i,,,,,,, j .., .ly _ , , ...$ .._ -:' . - - .,---e' _ *ft, t-t- ' \ 64 x ,,, i 1 ) ,.------- , L r''',-) , \I ir-(4 ",." ..., 1 - .. -- \ faith ' ;:' 4 ' ,, / , ,, , f \ / / „„ )1,‘ +1 -...'- \ - g-W -- r--;-- , :`,.) / & ,...„ - ..,„0+g 4' '''- 0 f0 N., „,- - „; „-' • 1 + ,---' 0 .„.... ' 7: ,R .417NH._,.....,, g4a.,. , 11 __ I . `?.., .-/-'-' '1; :ig N''-':, -4 . - 3 ( , 9,psp? alkiril 1 I e ONE1 Pim C vjrn„. .61 i 9 r 8 10 pi „, , 0- ,,,,,---- / 1 — ig ,, qpfti , , , .. „,) 33 Al 0 rt 5 'I ,,,.1 , 5 t‘., q , ' , ..i. ...„ , ox ,_.. „i -- / T1C1) rriliCII''') . "". \\:\ ';':' ' '19.ri'' 0 C X .11 2 „ . fv, .,4/ / „ 1 g R _ rri rz! VI • - to k A p .1, q J E--1 > ' 1 • r— , S.,0 Q Al Z ''', , .,1 f,,, ' N. ' T .- •- / - -i 60 "1++ ' 1 ,+. „ , , !, i, _ '" ' ca 9 , _ . • 4' 11 ! 111 t - -- A S- • .. tg y„ gl 1141A • ic, -A.,,..- i - ,, / nisk-\ , \-44' . ; X ti) + q + 1 1 CI 1 r 9 I ,..*I. , ,V 4 ' k" i • irg --: 1,,, ,ei„...:).. , % a , 1 ± 9- q 1 , ,..., • j L ii c-,,,, IX ,,t. Afr, ,,,, ..1' ,,,/ • 1 rr, .,---01-4 i „..... N.%i ' -,-; „,_.-•-• Pt i 0+50 • 1 g - \ / ,ta, .....t. i - i \ ,, i 1 1 v,,,, :T.) •• • 0 ..-ri t.t. 1 I • Of, "t1J If i ',4*._ '" ' r. Q R _ .... I :;\11, x f J /1, All c \ \ / 4 t;g 0 III ...” i , ,,, 1 0 —1 \ t g! gi 1 tii RI C a I _ _ .,...;,,,,111 ----, \ 1 .,„ _ , „ -4 ---,, 1 , 21 I 1 ite . 1 1 1- I 1 - --- ,,, I e, ,,.. 1 f ,,,,,. -I, at i ' !. 1 -, 2 i 1 1 1 1 #r "-; 'rt*4''''' • ) 1 : iVi • 4 -ii() , F,. a. *Ns-, • ■ ,.ii f ., .1'v , 1141 \ „, —* 1 i„,4 x-- 2 , * 1 '-it '*. P , I,. ..,......._ ___ , ,. 4_ S. M m „ ,...:..... . ---- I ' 1 i • „. ■ -It ;;;1;■?,,, 1 4° '‘) •+« C 1 ! ,i” \•,t '‘.4011, _ ..,. - 1 i :: t:5`' ' BD 8 ''''''''' I 4Ne......,\.,',. „......,,,' -."...' \ Q.) I ' 1 •B i i,-, , ,, ..,.^.'''''''' ?).. 'ifr.k.'••■,. ‘ ..,'''''--- or lt6'‘ 4 c r„ ■ r) ,ii rti ri) 5.1, t Se, i 2 5 (JD 1 d i.i4 ,r M ; - — 0 1 PIM IA 014 ni RI 41 twat - # , cw ilvel 14 141 ltri- 111 _ 01 1 6 z z -114.; z z .tr. .‘„r P —I rr 0 2 0 9, 56 .* 0. Lt, z8 ‘_________ i 2 P coicr. W a g _um 0 f cii -74 p 84c Hi t..; M 0 . 1 . , , . l `. •=7:0;,-- ; ■ - - N , ) -I- ■ :- ' .I Ss-.-"-- ...re'''' 1,-- -''''-'1 1 "- --.4 y • l'1 (.0 cs.1 zto CD ..4 I ,,_ .' ,-- 11 t / ''',... , „E'■ ..., z , -.- ,. ,--,f - ' ., , k In CO I-41 / 6.,.(9-- ----- L ' - '°- I i ° ( r g a! W eL s... x K ..1 i „..„.„. 1„,...,--"-e-- ,—) 5 3 i' ' S r.,„ in ,,,:, 4 X I 1-)./ i ,, ,° - 5 Itl W III 14 , 5'5 • .,v It S 4,,,...1 ! 1 - W M W # # .. i, t4§ ' 4 CP r- .eie., --'-- • 1 I -, , rn .,ea .L „4/ - -' V 4 , tx ,V, d i - z'.1 , - ., ....--_, ,, -..... I' I - . , — I , : / / • 1 : t I 1 1 : I 1 —.II ,..•;* ..0, • , P , ,, ° if ) ! °'',1'. li 1 I ,°.cr °.°_, / / , ii i •tit 1 ,' l, L..f..41 - f., „-- / ,- oc+2. i ;(i. 1• 1J Ili /7',--,./jii , L, lif/ a i it ,,, . ) ..:r /i` S ,, I , ,..' ..4 1 i f .0e I•* '''. I • i f e---*,:t .,/, ,, ' 4^ „J •''- __ ,,1 i / f IC 'hi / ;I, •1 ',,-,_ „' i il i. t t i yt • ; 1 'i,,..)1,4" ,•./ Y' , , . l' ....• .,g, 1 r 1 6 1 § / / / j*.- --------. ._ %-_,,""'--.- • 111 , 11 ,,11 ,. , 1 / / / if ' id e --- --,..... .../ / ./ 4 - •- 114' • „___ "<"/ / / / L-___.,„..., , i i , , 1 f, 1 1 „ , / . 4 "1111 illii 1 lli. 471 / , ' /• ,' : 'a 1/ : 'r •"_ °,, *(' (•,. 1 4 ' co...)...” 1,,,,,/ te,” / (2,„.i'' ."1'''''''..11 , ''......,., Litir".01 / 1 ' ' • ''. li ' ) 1 ik \ I t. i 1 P U 4 i 1 1 e•---iy/ (' l 1 ap, -___ A I,ii 1 __,,..-- ,,,, ---- „,,,,,----4m ," -- -,--- Id -' 'k,,...---- - _..--,---- 1 4 1 , .,, r i , 1 :,,,,i ` - ?,,,,-,„ .., „.„------ __,_.,--- 4 g irki --.7.- 11 i i , '''i \''' 1411 i li ° ,or V ,--- '''' i i • 1 ' 1 1 i0,1111 11 1 k\.'tt • *I ,._„_,:: vo,.' 1 i .i ,t1 i • "T,4fi. m 1 1 ill '" ' ' 1 C ' , sti , ,:", \\V", t, i, S 'g.10 1 I - 0C-1 )11110/1 ' ‘:\t's ''' '), ‘ 4i ::: _,------- .---''''.1 l' - - :::''' 1 la,tilliti,,°, °, t\, .-- .. ., , 1 ,,' ,,,-_,:, °44,c ,,P .....-'-' ° I ‘ t-1111CISIN 41 --ir-- [a, [ [ -° ) CP • .. ' i ' -... Ili ,,,,,* - 4k.':it[e' 'I - t • .' [.4lt 1 ,[114 , 1 € I "t , , ..;;', I t.11-3 ,, -,..,,,z; i• i _ , ti A'. •..0 1 ,or _ .,. ., it 1 #,;4 5 f 1'i 1,1 rt------ ----- \ - " '' i iip r. ', ,, 1iit i ,'- " °-", I L ---- ' [ ' el . " '"':1 ' Cl' -'171 7.76' , ( i _ t , 4 . • 1 11, . p lit >4. ..i II „ . . ,., , ti .....y._ , , ,2,40 . 1. ,.. .., _,- .1....., .., .... „,.., ,o, r4 s 1 4.... ,..„- ---t5t 4. Ii i _ \ .4 ,L... rit, \ ,Ft* -,, - - -- - ,, - 0 W p ——\ 1,,,,i It, I :) t P _..........._ -*' ''' ' --, 1 ,.,. \‘‘,„ v04.01, l' i 1 jai .11 7,,, ': ,,;:,:ii: •• i 1-,,,,, ... ( it) ( 1. • l'' i ".4 ,' t'.-t' --`", t k, i , ) ,„ , i ,,,•,.„, 1 1 • '"?.... ' t i t l'-' 41 , t i 1 i , . , , , 1 ,,,,, *111 , if ' ° i i• ,° L i 114-° k I -- „,.' ill I it /et el'i i I \ - 09' °I' .--+- '' \ ,.1:--1 , 1.1 :°1 111 f f ( - \ .,,,, ---7 IP„.3„- , 0 4-e-' , A .‘ .s. ..... , . - _,..„.,.... / " - - It , , 4,7,' , 11- , , --., i II IWI.' . H. , , ''''''-- >'llf ! = ' H;; ' 1 '' ''' 71 'I 1 i; ''' i.,!11 ;''' 1":■:. ',, ''- Vr ( •: l' i iii . )11'5\ . , •-,), .-- 1 4„,. •-",.. ",,'0,-•t 1 '' ' ' ..1 ■,, i ', . ;, .--- , i , 1' f 1 e k. 13 .. . ; • , ----„....., : 1. 1 -! litld , 'f, 1 ; A, ....; •- . I r. 1,7 - . -11*----44" . Z ,,., ft , „ • — . , . . --...„, . - 40., L - . .Pr. ' ' 1 5''' ' -, ''' • '--\ , 1' '..: ,, 1 - - C -- ,. 1, '-,„7; ; -; 1 ....; ; ;•1 i" ,,,, ; . „. ; ,, ...,..;$ ,..0 I/ '1; ;;; - g 5/ . i ,-, ,.. .. “, , ..t, ; . .: .. % '"...."' - ,„,,r i ! t" ..:a -., . . r t U • ' .l''is Is ' 471 '1 -- , .. _ --......,„, (1.4 rt ........._ - _ .... .t.I tt Art,'ttt. tt c , ,„„y" : ''',1 .,,! , -; ,, : ,.e.J a ...•.,......m „ ,, *." ..,". ', * t ' ,1 , . I g 1.7.i.i :# '''' r 1 * 1 . t 1:,,, '" , . .. i ' '..S' '' .q. ..„1 IR) ,, ,;.... itC r§ , , x . , .- , 44,. , (1 . . ! ,1,,,,. ,,,, 1,.... --- .,, , - 1• - -L:, k 7 ..... , . ,„,,, ---,7,-.4 Y 7 ' ) , 1 ' . . . , 1 tk ',. ' ''''' ' •" 1-'.. ' i : ,.: ' :f . 01A;.'1 \ ' ..,- ' i;' k-,..1,4 ' - , ' :, 0'- • ,.., . ''''i''' '''''''''''''''''"°- ,.-')--""' -R • 1 ‘ 1- 6") - 1, 01 '4/ / --'' ' ' -' ,,,,'4 1 :1 -s i1 il . ' /,' , ' .• „, i of o.., , ss r . II' ! t 4 $.9cpc pi z if - ' 4' 4e dtd ''1 't ....„,,,,,,,,, 't .. it ,.' 1 tt- - ',A .' '-' ,1 i 4,...,, I lc i,'., 1, 'II:- - 1 ii t i , , ,,,...,„— i i , ..,.-t. i , ,. ill 4ii * i * \, ",cc / ■ -,, g ',.; - ' i i ; ;;, '!„, ;- ; , 7 '',/,.: i '-, _4 Ill ../ . ...,.... ' , 1 , 1 , ; s•'. 5+5CH t -.c'—_, .--4--'44 \„. ..---,,. _ i . ... -,'. 11 g• , / - •'.. 1 II ' _!,_ 4.--', *-- , [ , ,• 1 - -4 1 '- • ' ,, , - —/ - . ,,,• --------- 7,1 ,i... ,,-- „A., - 7_-/r, j..., -, _74,/ ,:f / • . 7 - • • - • 4;..,— '-' ' 1 '''5- ' i 1 i i \ ' i ' . . ,-- ,. i • . , ,• 1 , • - • :. .-. - , 1 1 . " 1*$ -- ' •\ , , :. -- ' \ 1 C '.^ i ( ::lci cl ' Ali& <64''''‘' 3 " c" 1 ,410^..,111111110. , k 7 , '.,. ..: :■ - \ c., I s cc c!,cic:c.cX. 1 alfr 1 , I . - 'k.. 1 \\ .'c" cc' 1 ''co , . ic, E. i: HIc. 1- 4 c .ir. i 1 1 - ' ‘t. 0,. \--,. i !, 4 .0- ; - -4 5400 .41\ ■. 1,,a 1-• i , ,, ,i,• 411,—._I- ',.. c I\ ,... ',-,, '!„'i.1, c,... 1,9, . ,, . %,;.1 „, . . - •11 li ' !. i '''N- • • . It \ -40 I • . =, : 1 1 ,.,,,, R C.'. f, ''.., ''.:.',.', . , = ,,.' ‘, ,-„,__„,,,,„•0 t..0 1.‘4H1 i .!"..1 II: '; \ --7N---_,_,__/ „,;,. .. : Z i€ - e , - §- ','I. 's f ' --• — c•-, 6 N -', \ ',,4•-- -. -'- .,,. ,, .-4 0 Li li• L.:: ;, ..` ., . \ ' 'L-7,-1.--, -- - ,.-, 0 1, _...7--• „...47--•-- ,, ,.,..,_„„. _„ ' ' '- 4 g„ ,.^ 44” , ,,, , . ,_ ...„...„,„, / , z 1 i, , . ., . I ,.. _...-Fes,;:. -, ''kr.4 e• i ', 44; , _..-- --- \ rrr- ,..„ - -- „ -8 - .t`f.,,,-et,,, n ----”- `'. 4 <-c-,.'''' , ,„.... ''•-■,,,..,,,,,,. / i •I ,,,,,....-- 1 '''' -....,,va 1 ,,—, ___--- s 1(."'",t0-4, s t,,,,-" - '<' • ''' \ ''''' . , . - \ 4- '--, ,,,,'„,,,,......,4 / ... 41' _,,,...,,,,„...<''' - '',,6t4,,,, --' , -,4". '''',„„„. ._.„.4 ''''■ l'.% :4- ''-'-'s, ..-•' — . . . , —0,-- 1 i ( ..r‘ :s, _. - '';‘.41.15 ' 4- '-.. 4 1 -, ---,4‘ 1 3 I i ..,..X. , i 1 t . ,.... ., 1 . .., ,..- 1 -,- :, - ., i'ill ;R , . , , ... - , .. ,,. 1 rd 2 ... , , - .4 rit . , .,,, , , i,, , , 0--;•.•_-• _ . ,,.. , .. kr.p 1 1. ,„,-• „:- , i•-,,,,e„.„---'--- . .,.., , --..„____I _ 1 , 1 .. , .,, , , , , , '''''''',..'-'----.„ 'i „ ',,,...4.,x 1 .,.1 ,... — , ,',- • ; t 611 i'il row 1 j ... , g „ 1 _:,i,!.,.,{ i , , , ----„ ,,,,), 4 4"-"'' "" '"' g 0 0 ii ...,0001•44, , ---,I L• ; .e,' 3„ ..:- 42 „.., ,....,,, .....„,„ 1,-, 1 •' . :;,,,"' 4' 3 Li gul . .., •„ LL......„_.L.., i / ---"-"— Th ---,_ ..... - E. if m , M - fir , r 1, , -"'-"'"" __ ,, HM ' 1 k ---__ --4\ m ----- __ ,•,.,:4„,, '--, • , d'`4; ‘,..= r,..pR - .' • .,..,. C,D l'-:' : 1 l• - - —_,..... • ,..„. CI -., -n ... 1.*4/ , i. ,1... , 1 , • NJ rei ,.„, ,,, ,, ,, • , 'Vt,',.'i , , , , L'ik [ OH, 11 , I. z— , (i'. . li '. 'li.*.: Fin, • ,.? i I 1 . 6 _. 11 i a -ii , , ..... . r..^. Ln 8 ' t; ! _e, 4 . rl • • CO .ti PI ' • t.r4) i .' " .. , trl 0 .ri "13 t 1 : *; 1:1 ; 4 It 4. R 2 0 41 - - t ata L.K.. I Fit,* . , otr. rier, twit oast It a•*raga }'u -... ..,.._.<, . ,..- .,.... .., . RI w * CL cri ... k, i 41 P ti.1 „„t 5 s H � 0 -9 t; w __ . ar y j I { "M..y i, i �Y f r� \4 j,'e '+ g i .� k .may y ��+ Y a t i F — —U r , gg : �^ ' ' ,- ' .ti ,t ''i Ili ri � /"....,,,,, i �y'`� . A f? }'�. _ d " �!. . f F <� `may, v 3 - $ F! 3 s s e:- a ` '' a )E e� .' fj "' :'' " pit /'fi tr r`;,* F \ [tY 777 Yu''�' " af �(J S i r`', xt �. tr 3 F i € er,tl4,i4, 1 ( a ��r `"`«��.,£� ..r a pep E `: S 3{ �£€I it .4 rte' 'A •'''' ,,,,,, ...."— .oPi te''''' \ P',I, `P y i ,„' ,�'. ^',ry r° ,f`/y !?;ppp ,Y� -'04. ` 7 `p e (y ,fJ �g' �g„ , ,,,_C"� y. '`< s>£” '6 y N S , tde°”-- F .m ,?. {�t i .. Y . q ■ p y SP ' I '-1a ? r 7 ' y' �p �� i°�,C �e I 1 i E e= •)),� 1 -t f Av. 9-iij�4 l £ g ' t x 1 n�F k ''V £ 9 i j y 4I € 0c'�ry v. �€ e a € ,, _ "t q `--�-..,,g�j i t€� .'II J t n � li y v i I r t = ,' jt'd ^ , i ,._ t , . ter, , ii _ g --tE •f a ct, 1 z W - - ,,. £t° ---� j co �, < t UI {{ q t "' %l','.. *` .'*'/ €Ci�:,, sir s.''-. Tj Lt , Ui k P '� ,,, a`;r f e ii33 i� i E f b 3 1 . ' 1 ' g p'J,t € 4 L 1 t A -.._.. .. . ..,..---` •- I �;ti�ti ! dtfeld,{ f 1 t,'� °,.ms''µ.. 1..,i ,�,€, „ w x. $ s3 ♦ ,r �� '"Ir.y�i S �'d ' j id ` tr �+mF " r °' lea'” + a it r r i,, p t„ I� I 11 .- ra„, --gip' ' °;1 '' / 11 j�J 1_.s . 1 d —rya^'°°_ y R i ;„�. 1 l,y iii } N "" J(� \ � �W t, 'ft/ '4 R 4, y La f w ( ,j i i i /f''� f : . `. ie ! iI ,i ct�a Y r ! Y X r TM.- I if' e'a``""` A, + W r 4y' ' 4 . a > „r", e , 2 r � 4s;, /^x'4' Trf @ {. / 1� . .. � Y"../.i- ",,, ' '' i ,r _ "i 1" J r ----„,''''''',..0.-7:-'0'," j 4 m. ''Y+,-.' i ` R`. i'1 e +'1 ''\``''�b%A \'* k' `LL " - „e. //II''4:1?(11/6 ji g \ kai`,`s �9`5, $,%a 1, , -.. I @ a 2 l ' d v 7.7 ilk, i " ' r 'i } 9" S CSw , r 3 6 . If'1" ✓ r 14 1 p P I ,, ', 1 ia,,,d �, . ,,,,..'2, , 3t m i ' :; : ^` . 'r. 31 ` I 'C V 1 j E? a.> '5 iy 4. -80,i t ..._..- j r tCA 3 "' t it i 9 . J e dt 1,v,ii.vr -tt '.` ftdl1 � n ' „,,.74.4% 4 e�w 5 � t y i 1 ,71'1 , w A . , _ z J,titJ l`.-. l e: 1,141 I 1 . a d • i - � 4 to r rn 0 t. , ' �$�` 6 0`9 _ J , / f, . , 1 _ 4 � OQ r'#' d , r, ,t .• Iii } / 4 f • ' 4i \ 4. 2 r--^ [Jai^!T .7 '"".. . :. ,-, " a 1,}'�i} 1r,r,t s5,;;1' $r - ,,,. [:5 4° 4`jw 1'. i#`{ +fi� `� >T`4'' °f 1tt«✓ i E „E,' 5R : .ari"a W, .. ' -"- �;; A �: r• aq ?„1„,!..)40,4vs,:... °.-- ''l' tt��FFJJ33 7Ai r ''.�+ t r ' r`" r k J 1 / I [,9 drx r , .'lip aO y1' �s t � ,♦ ,ri-< d r nA dt-� ",- ,;;:;,11.", `,+9' / / //, �2!R t � p�' F,g'�� b '-'- -„"'t••-7�^' !' ',1:"/:' p t ff#';( f l f''a .+I< ,,ffv �, '` v 21 : `1'7,-,,,34,..„.' `- d.,t c g:,,,,,,,...,-...-,_,,,,, \:-ik '`.°r`.;�r'" d' /.1„..-`,,, @ f j its ✓ f P .i 4r' C _ _"_""" 3 :'.. fi'.;/''''-" - .;K;-.'.'"l......t---'''>z.')::";:'..-.;'-----':'...'..: ''' -.-1..',/./2 /0 ili.. i / :. ilk*, 4,:."1 .- i ,,_.v4,0.; A . " ,.o.'- .//7 i r ,it .., ,-- , -*, ---, .,-,, ,,. ' ''. i' -st.'":::,-- '-<.:-7,,,,,,,,,—.,,,,i• r,„,, ,,, 4'17 / ,- ,.;$6t 40-9g . ,•I'Vgg I r it` .�' j ¢} RrVoi`,9g"';'''''',../0"11,4P-0'''''pt't{(/f"t---".r`s r r s ,'`�,i� a� ,74 4 ;* T. '''!`" • ?' r,, # I Itr?rs d 'j ' Risf Jfief,, *. ,>', ), { r�` 10�' " 0- a «i. � SSS 3`�rr t 1 r i'l/te`dfi",'.11) € xF.f s ,�"+' - '.'46"1.''; F � $+5* p ..gyp CI , ' 1 a- �T id�YYJJ ' ! E f 1r }{pa,`.tFp FdM,r/ fjEI5(p'�pr" - •�' a F 4 .f.e/tfYf:dld'ty/R. €ii :�' ''� d� R ,� 0 � -"f`"-7[`_ �, Q" rI°��, _ �' __irs ; {E �St ,9' � f' ,t,+ ey f $ t r � M' t a ,F ' ' 4 u r:, 4 � { i . 1 d"y f , Y , �fi r ff� h AE Y -� '- r d1/1f r ,- . J " r J__*.s ..r .. , t1 y " 7 va r VI .i ' ' / r i � ' t '` }j , r s , ,' f r f <T ` ' q. y � u 1 -' i 410p, t p yv H %x p, g , , *` ei li 1 , , ! , ,, X I Jfl �,dg 05.2 a Pm 1111i11.115 , I 41 MO #41,4 *It All ileitlitalld ON N - - P pi. ... z r a K oz I t - • - : - u-1 A li I-4 I I o p < °- * .• V; UJ U. 0 1...0 w 0 ''') -,. W +zrl- 't D g Ft) 0 < 1 2 6 L-1 2t li cf) a„, . =.2 c 4 g 1 e u ,4, 0 ., ,.„ u 8 m. -q ,g 1 cf";1' 0... .! u 1 ; _ _ en (NI Li_ 1 , CI .._1 1 1 laJ c°4 z .1.. z 0 w H ILI LD - co a ' g 111 . LII € ..-I LU 3 (7 , 8 I co u, ,- 0 < • P 0 W I= Cil: 1 LA D L, / I g I I w z 0 Z 1 tA4 ‘,„) )- -4 a. a P A ...., u. , , 41 D al IS , < v) --J i 7 ! LU Z;t,'It..--) L L JZ1 1 .1 1 ,... CD 1 1-'-' , %,,,,- i LU ' w , L , i , ,4- , I— I— 5 a , w . cr UJ cr) 01 I l'^ i, 1 - - . — ILI co 4,11 1 ....1 1 w "."----u•-,-- ll t , '4 -I ..c.2 , t4 I 1 cc I-- R: u, * '-..,i'ill g i , cL 9 TO F:t'L:' . 1 ! 1:z...'''' :i:7 '''''' a , g ' 1 F cra W (k. tci nv 6 1. a0 fi _ 7.., U.1 MI ' 4 i,— -- k^A t.,:*2 ,.r:tN rt _p.m w 0 ,., !— Ell ,c.. ..,„. 4 I-J-1 ..Ar'' > brl ///i ----"' J 0 ..... 1 W o Q 2 f..D 0 •x- rz Z ta) I LI "7 g Li. 0 * , 'Z' T 1 f.,„,1 1,‹ w 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 (5 to (.5 z R P , 1 \ z ...- w (0 x w , , \ -,, \ 1 , U. xcn 6 OFi l z m ,..... 1.117Q 0 D .. —1 M 0 1 -0 C0 1 -A 2r. T - ' ,_ r, I. ..„,.;„,.. to R 5; E' ?! -- r, cm ni 0 m c clill 2 1:i l'' `.-,,- -- itt":,gia*.;:. ..---,,:, 4,4 . -A r1: .)1'" ; A !: —4 71 H —1 0 - i,11' 5 > . I EE' al (r) „---— ::-- '' .„,• ., ,41-k x 4 ril cc0X PI — ^ R7,,,,, 8 ‘. ri 4 Z m4CP4 1 4°,' --1 '..,„ (..4.7° el 13) -..,XCI:i m137 i.c 31 8 2 0 m , m m , Inw,, _p. so* p . m ,01-4,-, .N. - i - x rir * s ,, ,ter, ,,, ',-m %ito . ""4 -^I - 9 ...) m m m r. - v,iii --F 1,, ,. (1 X1 xi r T. 0 I I I h; imi ..A -9 M I 116 -< r al *4 „du. , ,. -Iv, tmotomorsilitilli 1 ii Y..% 41 N 4111.4F% /?r* 4 Siti,II' 4 4 e up in ilit me am aat %I* i.. 4g°14 M 7°C \ lit is z Ri 1,3 16 ix, .,....0 u) , th * . lk it* / ,4 ., , — .-g. __ i m = U3 r4 44 4441.Witt N°64:04.itt +441:1/4+0140164+4%%OW I / II —1 cn ° :40,-, ‘,...004,4+%.„,.... , ......... ... . .. . , , i. +Nkt,4414.44#"44,00.Y411 , MO OM r" > . + ./Ve SN• .0gli I I „,„4 1 ‘'^‹ itek + $60,--41propr, -7,-- x c 8 m s Lo s, r•-ost Lia..,41t44 P +44,,,NritSOC""rft) 1 ?3 , 0,40,A., ,..iro, ,,, - .4,.,,, 1 .1 1 5 AP' --. ..% - ;# 4' ".„„-,....,....,,,.....,, m k p„,,...,.. 1 „, I I 1 i m Ai r r. a ti .5. 1 5 5, 5 5 r„,4 1,5 5 xi xi m 0 , .---'w .,>, r- l'-. g / -‹ X 0111 , ' 'Ili 1 '. r-- • 0 a 0 6 -‹ > C 0 m.x al bi 0 11 cn m 4r =4 41 H •, , c 5 1-2 g J 1, 2:2 $1 ..,r ...., m - . rd. ..: II - ,-.4 -11 m x t N.,,) .,. !lo .77. 01 0 0r1• aa _ , ., ra Z [j ^” -----1 ..:—..... , . M NI I I 51 , 41 co p , m, 5; il t rcil 'V II w 1 r* P s i 2 .... t rrus rTsX.E.:1 g , .n i. , , ', 2 i-, _ co b r131 r...7 CD t..• p t., _ F II , I 1.0 $. M F--Fi m ,,,,, ... Ft. , c.,), . ' : P:3 *-• ___,---1 a cm z c, m c m @ . . . . , ......... .,,,,,, , ap .1. 00 ay § K 3to. . M rii 11 .c.r13 7:1i r.rn ; /8 c:'° / 1 i XIM . ..( I ...1 0 4r/J M m C m -7-ea , . r w 03 X e' '°4 ni el Ed 0 0 pin 10'NO `c 44-..46. ;0,10k. 4, 6 1 1 i ;mu ii;1mc 27 31:06 ! ! :011 x*„...0 0 ° „rt. 1 MI II ,,,,„ ...... -4 --1 %4TSISAllosiz*** ' 4,--4-sxosasVo a. tiMil:4• %,41 0 gri m o m s+.1444++ *4173., v Ni, re R 1 ... Iiittt 44 %,,,‘ CO+,it Itt, e5,*1.1.**:5:5 (,5) § ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,, ,1,4,4%.0 %, —,......--- 12 i vomo.iy* 14.. .1. % siqt vo, v.,. .4„,-, CJ 0 q 001,00404*m IS+lr, i Z -4 el Aet* ' 9i Nis, :0 4Air. *4' M A p -( 8 Q . k„+N S , Sylp.+40 404, 41 • 1 tai --' 0 >, Mr- r- rti , kt.44W, 71 541/ 6444,k ■ 70 116. av% -4fr. +4, k A ?1 24 cr9-1 rim i 4111111111111=.4.44fflem. .11‹ 4 4,00%•%,•%, %V* "4, ; 1 I 1111 .m.,.. *4% 4t4te, Att. .; in lj 0 rri %. - 1:7 sot, !r ....sr ,, , `A ■ .1\s . „.. .... s..... '! : , > „ (,„ s . .,.... , AA k.,..1%.0%.s, tt, -,04 i s=t- 44,0 .voro, m r- %,..IA > .....,,, to 4 Al 4t, kr4 ' IR z 0 c x m ci 4.. ..4, , 6 v." 0,, ,,.. Y ,„ ..,,,7, › - m lIrn ...1 z 7 aft. ,,,),,,,,< 44.,."- ,.. ,,,,, ,,,, r 1 ''''') I , m „. t.,,- .*, , a`' ,2t" m .....,. . . M c,3 E 3 w ,71 FA M y it b 0^, ...s. ,- 40,F^tu :',^ -.. —4 r's 0 _ CO ct. $ Alps,10 71 g I igt,,,;^' , >111i r-i 1_4 '-' 0 "r1 cl) 11 4.1t*--- t71 10) to- ik GI g m tf. RI f — CO 1?7•1 § 93 M cf) Cr3 rn = El t.„1 .46 I 1 — %.■•• r° ,,...,0 •-• . ,_., 'urn q s 7 4 NJ x . AM INT 'St Mit wring OP13 1 1 ' a.bii 40 tic 022214222222 LE S pit • mi. K lz V a 6 z it .., z z Lu CAI a g - ... 0 c n xgirb 0 -4 0 1 I 0 . P ril v:, --' cl. tU 0 5 w ,41' u j ix - c.c. 5,1 U 0 0 i ita' S c4 ; 0 R" — t— IX Lu I = (.0 01 il i 1 0 a t-,f; litx co 0 < 'IF J !A 4 * 'II w 0 4, 4., a ' ' A 41 4 E''''' 0 a, o 1 i , ,.. . , ;.. 0 ill ei co z v rii .6 cri (N LL fo V rcu° 0 rrF- t7i 0 n re 0 "41.. 4:, 0 \\Isi ri I il 1!i I f— el 0 L1J i 1 -1 &'13 ' ' ' .I' v < , ' - A 1 o ti raw <A . 1 i 1k 1 C2r) LIJ ' LA L , _ 2 - / '-'lik.. , 10 Y ", 4 o i..; a, ., (..-.. -- . ,4,,.---,-,,,,..- i S2 ',- --1 :"..14,,,lbr•N . ‘...:.-, N.,,.. ,_.-z ,, . ...41,.-.,,...- s, x,s ...,, -, ..,, , i .,„, ,, , : :444,4=V1#47, -'-= ., Nomb 11 1 Va CI , f ,;4 , ,, ...,.4 s t] uj misissompli , t tFFT OV,...,t, x..4.R: A. „, ri ' 2-, 1 441U2 rite':.'" """) lir+ '-I 4".V4,422:- ''s• 44. % 1- f 44.../t 7;i.. 1 V .00 ...__., 3304,4Z'Irirtal.e.4- kt .,1 ., ,,,:a.....;3::„. ,3 * ., 1_ Li 4:4_. ,,,,t , x, , .4. e,.- -- -fJ" 14,750,,e I '' 4. ''''.A ■44,...'#°' S (1) M - ,, °Z.i. ..11','.1%..-, % 33 " - ' 1111'%% % . t. 14..t.- t _.=,.. 2.....,q. -1 1 .Lcta-r1.464 ' +14. 4, --14: *,- L.x.....1.,,- ..,•-.., Ilk ,.. LLI `ttt...90t, ) (1 : ' ttizf'24;ttliff: " --------- E., I 0 to 1 , I. % 7j 11 1 . 4. iii r, / 7.2 CCi yr41. •7 , ps%* •- Li ' 1 : 1,tl......... F 2.--- i".:-., re z 111 2e , , g w (01 —I ..K., t' »44 t;t Lj --- i. ici ,A,... 6 wcI 22 k ii6 4 ,,,,, W W '-',7,1= .111! - 0 n 74;(1 -=‘,,,, ,i 0 01 W IX i N 0 41 _i r, ; •-..t. ..4 CC D 4=9 U g 16- 4 P .." 2,?, ■2, 2` IN Q c) w re _ :k'. a Ix ,,,, 0 z 422E a '44 I- 0 1 1:, ..,of ...,1, H ; „..4.: ,i, ,r,,,. ...„ L.,,...0 , fn U-I U1 tx a_ u.. _, p 2 w a. . -1 .... < E - , > ,__Lk) cl- u- o - .ec 8 F:' Lu -:-.4, 1- 2 -: vp,,,......, ,, 1 .1 422 2 CP ''.; [-' -- •2•0'4"0 03 R, k ' ikimoro 0'2'r If;< LL I- 122.,0 UJ 9 ce a x o 111 A t53 -I, I- 1 '4' 2;2?::;: 24 12121 cr) 3- 1 s„.9 I-- Q in a - 2 2 1 () I 4,1t A. rE),- 0 1 ••,1 ___0.1 0 2 w I ('-•''-• i lic 6 F.) 6 1-51, ... 2-- 9 c60., ,,,.., ,. 0'Li 4::( r .H.,. D 0 0 x el- 2 CL,, 12 al LT. 1,-- • 2,.. ...J= x - " g H. L f E 0 5 a a 1 W Pi ,.. ., , kl •/ ---j •,•J• •••••••••"'"' *. 1 , 1 Alt • iilik/ L.< ••••,..'''''''' i re an r4t, 2"2 ' w -2 a =.1 ..j ....I X 1-- ° , rt . -:::,\,°`-' Ns F- ,‹ - -4 H---"+-1 Er 0 < 5.- 0 x W UJ r/ i ,.,() L.LI ft) F- W 0 0 U ,..,/" ,clei, n , liD IIJ Ft( -1 0 •, * % j , 5 W 2 1%4"4,,,,v tts..), ' (ri Z :6 Z O . ; 0 4 \ '... e ' lit* " LC, 6 ;74 • (DO W W ril 14 ,Lu a O z W u j 0 to 4221" Z ce a o FL] o mi o < ' o E 111 g 11±-j Fr- eF) El UJ Z § 5 titO 3 c. n a z r- Ft g a z 0 ui _.■ co I E f 1 w. I Y ) 1 �. S / / 1 y S. j k I I I t i I I 7 1 nr i i i f 1 m 1 1 4.1 j i S- I ".' I 1 1. .0 ' 101 I C I ii m i I a- r3 01 0 -r1 Ni 09 ' o 8 , v ,._. 1 i 1 1 7 g m 1 d 29 m NI p 01 0 RS PCSIC6 41T NT OM IlbCI . ,111 Z t '%::., ', K x 4 8 , I [--1 0 0 , 6/ ! 1 Z 1 Vc i 1 li . L.,„ 0 I !` H w w I ice. r- 2 '...;.; i : 1 / t 1' I i t 3 1 {t 1 ,, I'1 '. 5 m 'F. 1 {Y Ci� i 1,'i,-.' .. I 1 fi R l > 1 ( f r 1 4 lW = e - 1 11 I I t i m S ! 4 �r � /s / .1 i 1 ,.,. t `^, I I, I i + : ,_ LI I 1 k k I I { I I i I I I 'f ` ` I ill 1j ■ 4 i f , l ?.. H ;; 7C:1 � 4 1 m �. C cn I I m ■ • e 0 m 8 8 , ,,, , , itil , 1 m ielli , , g E m I Jt o 0 in 0 RIT if 40a 4,14 IN YtkH/.bl EY y T 1 IN K 40 g Lu co 0 Q ! 111 _ r 8 LL 0 CO H W W I 0 I 4. I . I 1 I i • I f I 3 •-•-• I _' I j I 1 '' if() , K =i I is I :. L. 1 cat 9 /if ',1! 41 It V ? xp [1: ,(, 1 a I C i i r.. I m t I I 5 i j ..P. I -I- 1 i 5, L -1 j j i I .4-, 1 it I L¢> I € 1 i s 1 1 I I m m H ro , 0 11 N) ' 1 ' 2 g 8 r 1 v 11 i g , g m q I I I _ a z N III ti/ z 5_1 r q : 00 .. 8 qra RY11A • MT Or GAIL , E lba LY IN 11teilAZi UM - R P 0 � as 0 Co i i i g u., ...., ' g s 1 1 ...1 • 0 0„ ' Iiiii ,.i, . $ 8 1 LL 0 Q CN LU LU CO i 1 ! °tt I 1 1 I ri ,..4 I —I- i t J a I k- 1 .= a f B 1 f j I ii a f t - gg� %3 . E ...ail I 4 L i I II i iii / 1 I =k i f / t IA 4j C I i E I r; 1 1 * M F a- L.-- ; c I I r I I r, i rri I I• " m "'rri m v H Ct —4• -1 Ni 0) 1 2 oil i a2, , - _ � � H col a0 pc 7 .. 1 .F:a VII . 5 _ .. Ftlw to h'[ err DM zmtl ur 1M 'Yit19Aai df * If —: i .c 1 K 0 H � a CO W 0 H W W I r F7 3 i'l II + .) 33/3 r t I r I~ i y, I I 3 tj 13,j. P � ' • 33'3 334 � r:t. 33.3 1 II I w d •. a / z v 1h .. 33 I I x 3. • f" i .... .... y 8s .. 1111 I 1, 1 i I 1 i i t 11 i i ,1 I E 1 1 1 I a ," ! r r' I 1 I t t^ tz i (1) m m 1 —1 I 0 Y Ni-n ;. (4 4 g 1 r ' g 1-ei col 8 .., I-3 . 1 / 15 g cil o g 1 i I 0 ..., . , . 1 i - III Reh$02114. 911' MT PM 1d0 Wk 144 YCCIki711 tel r•-• CD cd ! P z 1 g ,..... 8 1 co I 0 NI ' H w f w 4- z (I) i 1 I 4t i pt4 I 3 I I ' I s 1 a u ..tip y _( I . 4 N 1 { i g4.1 I 1 / I II T I I I r 1 Ar {fffffi i J S ... t'� W. .. +i r ) M^ f__ .. a6 11 H i L, 1 li I 1 3 �, .V I > ... 1 i I / — ,+l r / : ,.. it 1 _ o •p , \ L: „- , e S' -� I I. M M zo�, ux r H rin cn 0 1. 1 g ' 2 g g Pg, 4 I 1 I 1 : is 1 0 i . i ..: ,4 . 5 _ ru u M SWUM Y iGo J H ag CO 4 V L 0 (0�p+� C J H W I (J e f i / i . .x I i _ , I t i + ;,• C i 1,1 EE ✓: k^ r' 1 pie! h.. „! / 1 N' .. `Y P Sally Ellis 4 _ L L4 From: Mary Blain Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:31 PM To: Sally Ellis Subject: FW: BLD14-44 DC%D M ICED date. Attachments: Twana Plan Set(70% Design)02-23-15 - LOW RES.pdf [r 1 This is an updated site plan. Please print and distribute to Donna, me an Susan. Thanks! Original Message j From: Arny Stonkus [mailto:stonkus @comcast.net] MAR 1 6 2015 Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 2:32 PM To: Mary Blain f Cc: Deb (PARKS) Petersen JLrrb SUi CuUNTY____ Subject: RE: BLD14-44 FT.Or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hi Mary, I am sending you a revised plan set for the Twana Creek Fish Passage Barrier Removal and Restoration project. We made changes on the bridge length in response to a request by the tribes.The new bridge design has been reviewed by the tribes as well as WDFW. I would like to schedule a meeting with you to review the permit status and next steps for the project. We understand that presently our building permit is on hold until we remove an existing septic system. I left you a voicemail with my phone number as well. Thank you. Arny Stonkus, P.E Ecologist/ Engineer Wild Fish Conservancy 206.349.3955 1 — j ~ '�./-,,,, R') ...: \P R� ›. (2) , _ n. cir DO> x C hrM : 0 WI. ..... 'xLL IrY rik) Pt• Ail. . .4 � • i v,.t.o- e .. 1 ::.yam 9% ! P:1 rmml 1 w I . 4110‘64-.' ' \ ''. ''s • '7'..:: e .. .::.-:721k- rim: (01•41,4 to c I ...jog,: •. 0 =.• '.., ...-- . . • 44, R 2 > "Lii....j P Ilil r----J pro ; n.� .ct-14 ' c . .."1--.:=4.1g:-•dtiltAill66. ••t '' ,t• ni 0 ,...4 1•1 iC:10) 17Iii,A ›,. 9 1 V Owlimini 0 " /r` 16 , n H f ' -N.,„ 8 H i: 4.--- 4 !1, , , 141110 i& 410.,.. , , , 4 ,,,a . :'__ = 4 Rtil ,i,,J ,,o - & ,,,:. - ,. . ,, . , 70 0 W t __ tr. I-4 iimizaol r I _,..,.._.0.__„1... 0 (1 __.7._. . z h1 C4e) > . R \ 1 ,1 b /0-- 0i. c 0 _._ 1 h C z r*-1elf, j lt er.00. n \ t '' Grp . (-1 NJ h1 1 N N f' t--+ " M+ " ha^ M M b M-* ! ip 0.� V Ch ch J L N) r-+ ... "7::----::. Z ,4 Z, j; rn c fl -IN LO N w 40 CO tr, cal .. w N) ri Q rn ti �`'- ' ..� r7.{ i C) ' $ % {r m rn rn rn � � � r i � i `t l.` LE LI Ln cl Li Lf Li LI LI Li L" co co L' Li V1 u Vl T L1 [f] G T l' 17 Z , d ,V tti crn-: `LI m m rn rn m - - =rr 8 4 —- = _ _ ti h=. p M ]` { ° rn � �� ✓ i;�(, ti ' i, . P-71 � ? . V C 5 C C3 — Q JOCK [DG Gi 3 "7 "1C7 � y � _ ,S _1 -7 J.. W R ^ 7 Q I �y W W rJ N NJ 4+'M he h.• h+* 4p 4.11 ;-. C Z " �7 ° f• (in N '.J CJ h+ 4D 'J T W r do -F — 0 O _, D t L,K Il w yaw r ry NJ r ryr C? zy S Y b -..I 4.. C3 Cn hJ C? CO Ch .A Z Z (,• 'i } ":1 "Q rn h ^til c LF o rL !LJ P0 1 C� . • , ' „ . 1 . \ , . ,,,t% ..., ...,. ,' ... .." ,... ' . s \ • . 4:00N, • z , 1 • = r:s. .- ,,,, ,4. ,. ., .,.."' ....v / ' ,' - ■ 5 • . r•-• ., , 4."u e., • .1 •.,-..: ,.. L e ..„ ' 4k*t..,-7.,,f'„4-1444%;;4,f;,-4 ...::;i .' • 1 , 1 , .1 - \ . _ \ .., •-,, f i - ,---- 13'50 ,''',, % ?-1; , ( , , '3( - . I..3 4) ,,.. . ,„ , ......,. 2 ,, ET 4, ...■"" `. ,- E , ,....- F. eAL ft,, "'''''''''''.- IL) '', ''..-rKU P7'T'' 2 r' en 9 4-. .,,,, 4.4'4, - f__I i fl.,i .., f, M k ,. . -1 IF ".. rss'---,,, -1 1 i 'i 2 0 ri ,,a - „..,-----" , .., -,-----'-e- . 8 61 9 ID e• .. -I'It r- '.'I'" M r,it , H,i,- . . - ----.4 z--„.. • n, _.../ \ .F - -1-1` - , c .. , p--,.. ....,-. . . ....-- 6'; 6 - :.':.r' _ .*z.5,', ..,„ ,--- g •,_ ,_ .... . -,■''- .NIF I /TA , -. .,-- -- .,' 1 ., „, e: / ec. ... r ., '-e- ..,.. \ ,e,,,,,.., \ / op- 4>,,, e. _ i - • ik ,:--,,) -... .?` \ / A- .4, e',,4 • --" .- 1 , ,010.: II g., ''''''.. ./.- A '.' 7 , , .. , t r. e? / / P'2-7' ' , ,,,,...--". li N. r-...., at ,. .. .>' 1 I " illillb" 4 r ,..:: t - < ,/- -,,C5 r; .„Zi tt.,--, 4- * F, , , i ..... .....; r - - -- . ' - --i-- 0 ' 7: ?_ . , , ' . , \ . ' 0[13 0 1? >S 0 Fll ."- P..., 1.it ..„,......-- ti. .„. -n ,. Al r A A di rn .:- 2. ,...- ;...;A N , , Fill-T, Silorn -,,,4 i,c, -- r- ; / r.'; •/ ',., , , ,,,p< r4,' , ,_ ` '..a r - '-') * / ' :2 .1 k .-- ..._4. „ .i e t 7 z• i• .---"" / r / ,- E ^ 1 51 1 ""' -,--- 1r7•e7 kr,- II:4.:// 4'ri..: I 111 • _ -- --- -., ).- ;. ../ -, ig'T / - .1. 1 ...-; t Q,..... rit c-.75 ri., ..• ' ._, a! • ,.. i/;r1 1 'a 6 5 il r- u (411 .4 1., It.; ,' rn 5-11-7-In - - I. .... , .- -- , \\ - \ ,e.-.55 ''-'"' N'' ,..1' 177:11< . ..- „,,.. 44.r / i 14 ■ I / ti3 f_SI 6 r" 1 ;,'-', -',. __ OE AI Ipi...1 -.- 44. N4.,,,,,,,. i 'b. "''''' / ,. ,,...7 r.....s. ^=, .. /,.'," / F ) ./ 11 I ›- P (--- , 14 A --I ro - , • . ,,, / - -, 7, ,., / 4. 4,f,'''r 1 I c" a E.,''''' )'. . *S***\\**a. . ... i _- - .7 i _ .4 /01' f S.'"9 0 ..., .k. -., GI L. ../ rn 0 No . i- r. 41. 7'.4 ''. d...`. ,.., s: , .. ,..... .,,, .• • It rz; 1 0 ii ' - ,- - - 4. / - __ . 4-4, / ',.77 fl 1114 41, .' ,, ,e' ,."`.y_ • ril A 0 -.7 I/ 0 Ft)4 ,. _, , ., - r., / . - <,• 4. .. ... A-. 4 k ..,.., 141-ric. ?‘,., . - 4 '7/ . \'N.\ ' I.,...e _, , --- 8 A . _ .. . .. , . rn i, 111 MI 4- .. - 1-. T ,' I*---`:'`v\l'ilk, - _--- - . •- 0 i7.! 2t 7 - . 7' 1 IfA, ,--- :,7: ''' , p, . • , 1 a - ; , 1 i !!, . ' 1 ■ 1 - 0 g s ....... -- 7 II i, I I 1 "V*. I , _ '..---it'... I . r 7 r f i 1 pl a 1 1•J • , ,--4 I I -14 -e ..'e RI t i - ..= . .„- -1 1 - 1 ' -.'-'-'- - to., -. 4, -Al."- ) pez, I , . .,- _0 7 - -■ -11 2.73 . r"rn C) M A ' 7.. 1% I. .... -4 c'. 1-.1:, ; ) ' .., 2,. --- .G. . .4670,7= '*.- g PI 11111 M Ell rt. . , _r_ t u f,a4:1 C C. Ill • 1. i.„. 1 ' ' ''. ,,,if` r---"r 1 " M AI 411 -4 '• 74 r ' rrt ' iii 3•. J •1111PV al 0 u RI ' -'..- 44 - , - - in , - ‘... i -79 - --- --1 11 Fit 8 ? - --2 • . .1 r U '1)(:) ,- 4 1.... . - --.. _.../ i _ . ;..., 44 r .....__ -,, -- •idel■ M tn - 1 :: '-'''''-.-- .,' • "- -- A r? - - ''' 1 4.-;iii .....4 c ----_, .11 C, '11 1....) A L. ie.! ----- -- C-- -------------7) x r7,- .. _ , Ii. _ ..,,,I ,A __ ,, ---- 4-3 5 s - -- ,,, „,...-; ,A '"in ''',,,,, ars ' .p.' :: - - - g, -,- , , T , I ; , 4, , e , s 0 ?c/ 4 r - ...: -r;.,.....-- 1 , .461.1`.. ...- . . it : r) ,,,:i .›, li CD ! E - 4 2 ..1 . i-„I 0 P d -1 • > ._, T III _ cr - .. Z g 6 m , .4. .4 7 ■--- 7 7 FIR. 44.-es 1.4rt. 1411 4.' toff , i -_ . ...- ... - .....- .- .. -----...m.,-......--.....-,.. 7 4 1 . T. . . . I if lit, _....1:, A ,,,,c, ...„,__-, „0,5‘.., .r,. % 4 />--k, i 1 1 oil I, AiX i 1 I .... -, ---r- -----.. fl' l'' . . , 1 . i I . I ' '''.' $ 0„,7,-- __ 4,,,..-:!,,, 1 4-,/ ----- ,. . • , . . ..-, „ ,,.., ' ---,• iil ,' 17 ii iP":"-'4fr. . V-z..,, , ' 1 V*''' 1 .--..---— 04-r) • , • • .„ ,,•.: r k' . \ E..4..Th9. '?:. .. n iri g , .1)L2,04, 4° 'fr 6-4 I. i I \ ',.... 8(11171!a".' 2 _ t.) , c A■-i. L.,"41 I '',' 1. ); - '... S P!gl -,-/''' It '''.... ' ?.. :t - ,..--'-' F --- . , ?" t- 1 7- F.4 N.... - ,.... ...--.---- k _ _---;..-.'--....„4"-' r,..-- -, . it '-...., .k . 1- ' '''' '',/ . . I -.°r"--,... ' 7,...."' -44".. • . --"4 / .4, IP'.' ' 1 47 •----' I• 474 - ____.----- 344 '4%1'47 11 al 17 44, '''''' ' _ __„....._..... --'--' 7 4"- , x...,".! ,-.1., L. .-s, •,,,,'..,..,!I; li „'...„; 041 .."- s I y , ..,-. tr 'k '''. '' jr 1 ''''.. :":::.:4 I •. 4. r .,. 111 - ---te ■ , - , 110 -., - LI ?- "-- --:'.., ..,. d %. , - ' - "..,, ,.„,..,. ,..,:- L... 0, 1-4„....,1/ .,,,,,, ...!.i -- , ..,r S . . _-,--;°. ' i ,' . . L: ,,e;"E.!:: .......—..-- LOTI . -"/ t" ' q 't .), 1 '' __A- -* r .. . ''',.... ....., A - r --T I „_. , .........T-•,—.--- .... AN. • . . ------- i•-4 rr .11" 1 ------- , ,... g' I --- ' —1- 7 ,. .• ,.., I q''''" 1- ' -- K v . ' a ir.',4k. .z.--'?'E'•7; i I . -- . r:/._ I 1? •- :4 - 4 I 474 V '4''.4 • . ..." V 12: _ _. , 4 z,--' . • g , „ , . ,,,. . . . , ■ r 747 1% g ■ ..----'''''- 'x t'' / /r 1 , - - Ki Fi Q -. , 1 ii Fin .-;t . . . 1 . ... 10 I • ., I J.6 , f 8-ova - . : ....,..., I-- 1 1 i '''.----- _.,,. I 4 , il.. . _ - . -"----_ .., ?:7-P ,..., .. .... ...., VV — 1 I ----„,,... a, • ,.,-,)- I rl':---... 1...,•-•r' / , , ,y e', . in .-, _ / ' /.1, . .. a a.„.......-e 1. . / / ,.../ , 17.. 75 : • -' ..• ' -- r-,,--,• .1 l' . . ,i .„-- , , • r..,..% ;;;,.. ,... ---- ,...- , r-v-----= 1% , t..i .,_ in ill 71 ze ibc rn 2- , ,....-,.....: 4". ...- - .. 11„ rn - *-,,.,..,,,.,* IN 7 .... 1 .... .. i „Fr' 1 4,,I30 , rttr'4 1 ).. „, .1.7/' ,a4”' I 1 1 47.--'- -OP' I „.‹ a / 44-44•'''' 171 M 4 1 J, I 4 ri" ret S 34 S S T- :.; .,, IQ a''- . m Fri al ›.---- r, (--7_,. 'V 1 6 , m ' 44;'.' Cf) rn iil cd m° r „ ..__1.3, , P 1p 14` ., ir■"■■ cf*-• i , -, A. , ,7 r- - vr . .1 :A. M S.:: c - 5 ac4. , ././' ." i '-'- MI rfl 1,, ,I.: .I, .o. . .. I 1 ., ,c: 1.- - ' :f 0 , 1 \--"' (.01 I i 2 P., _72 a .4 VVVVVV i 4 1..X. R/ —" =. 4,:,,/ „...' , __,..,...,........,"' ,I i ? I CI / `4> (.4 L;1' 1.--„,44:me , 7' '4 4 ' . 4 i C) -.Ii— -..." -/-1 I MI ..,- ' 1p u„ ' Pi ..----- ...., ...... , s, . ..• 4 7 C_ lii • ' • 1 , 7 ■ e".) P'1. '"*. :":1 .717, 444• 0 rn '2' '77' 1 4` , 0,, ti t- ut, , . 2 0 Q r_n--I ...n•- _ 41 44,a4 H '.'rn > rj1 t:1 IT d /0 ua 0 M (.47 C/. •i I 0 ..- .:::: i , - X , ::: lilli 4 1 . NI. to. 1...rti, Hs 4. 1111I : , .. p �+ S � c M ' is''/ 1fS l t , - f` d v � f � y e Iy , jj i -'' 1 ' u ,� �, .....-r , -rte,�' } 1 '`: r eap I f ! f � I / F~ lac ot Y w E r n 1:4—\ or i F ` -, • ,i�8 [1 E .,it M 0 k iii I �`- i... , ` ,. I I II I4'`� �`'` �� 1r 1 .. i A: I 3 za v/. 5i G { lF .. 1 [ J -_ _ .k C 1 t, 112.1":110) l' !"-, 1 li ill f 1 rl m Ch . a ■ , cN ■ y m > m ra > 6 I,- • ,_ ,- ', rin t 1 a. I 1 ? A I" J - Y, Ci M ' CD• rn z _ :-44, • r ' 1 �v. i - I_ J� — ts.•a � =_ j '-cl iv,r �'y �1 s LO co CJ Ili f H VI .....- --- .. - pl: .4%.1 .iii ;,, Axit ,. f _- 419114' X11 " \\� /i � n r C k ) a N. _ \ ,• r xr ,1 A ry ax -' ill - I. .-1 Y rF. '-. t,".1-1",,. - { Itl w w W , a 0 •1 1 AI 1 AI .b } �,�1333ee 1. y .r R .t�j' -,ii ` I „ in l S L. Ili �} I to 2 ii di 1-1 1 I en i ; t /1'1 1 :„ ' , ,'', • 4 i ---------.-- : 2- 4°V) t h M f W I i f i v �n y¢ g 1 {{yy ti r r 7 `w `� , iIRthfl i} + , 1 Li 1 . f } N i ! , 7f– `i+ O ,,A,_ 1_ a 1 _ _t jt � .IF �)e �� - - „It 1 I i A-. fir` . f 0 - + (7 1 T 1 ,- i i '" —°--•- 3 1 I n T ^ -•'. -1 In U'ul�lYll b Q I �``p-?r,1� g 7,, ' 77,' uU j rr, n G6 o CG`l an { �— �l . i 1� i 1 m4 i o rr t1 +ms's , i }• ff Lit t CJ`s 1 ?-F". (/) 6 6 *-' q 0 'I 1-* i -A 1---1 .. L 4 of 4.x6'.'4L1. 11.1I •V lx-It JEFFERSON COUNTY �s``"° =' 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT y: :#° ??\; 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email' dcd @co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning April 6, 2015 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR PO BOX 42650 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2650 RE: SITE ADDRESS: HWY 101 CASE#: MLA14-00011 Dear STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. The geotechnical report prepared by Krazan (dated December 22, 2012) is a draft that has not been signed or stamped. Submit a final copy with an original stamp and signature. The final copy should be based on the bridge as currently proposed. The application indicates that some of the excavated materials will be used as part of the project. Show the stockpile locations on the site plan. If you have questions, I can be contacted by phone at 360-379-4466 or by email at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us . Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development within 90 days of the date of this letter which would be 7/5/2015. As required by Jefferson County Code, JCC 18.40.110(3) and (6), if the information is not submitted or additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90) calendar day period is not requested, the application would be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and application fees will be forfeited. Jefferson County Code provides that the Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration, thus any further notification would not be forthcoming. Sincerely, .Da/Z/Za Sh'QJIld/1Z Department of Community Development Staff c: File i (bores tl P,?t-e S2i1( J'fGiY Ruts ARNY STONKUS \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_Addlnfo_Requst rpt 4/6/2015 Donna Frostholm From: Sherrie Shold Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:53 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Warranty Deed for Dosewallips property Donna, Thank you for attaching the original purchase deed, saved enormous amount of research. I have corrected the ownership to be State Parks so no additional signatures will be necessary. Just want to say thank you for forwarding this to us as many of the state owned property could potentially be listed under an incorrect agency so we correct them as we go. Who knows why or when the computer became incorrect or sometimes the old history just says "STATE". Thanks again, and the records have been corrected. Sherrie Sherrie Shold Property Operations Jefferson County Assessor's Office 360-385-9105 sshold@co.jefferson.wa.us Original Message From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 5:12 PM To: Sherrie Shold Subject: FW: Warranty Deed for Dosewallips property Sherrie: The assessor's database shows Washington Department of Natural Resources as the property owner of parcel 502021001. Washington State Parks sent the attached to show that they own the property. I have an application in for this parcel and the property owner has to sign the application form. State Parks signed the application form, but according to County records, DNR would need to sign. Could you take a look at the attached (and the email below from State Parks) and see if you know why Jefferson County might show a different property owner than State Parks for this parcel? Thanks, Donna @ DCD Original Message From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [mailto:Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Tuesday,April 07, 2015 9:46 AM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Arny Stonkus Subject: Warranty Deed for Dosewallips property i Hi Donna, Thought I'd just send you a copy of the Warranty Deed for the Dosewallips parcel 502021001 showing State Park ownership. We did get tidelands from DNR years ago so perhaps that is why it still says "Natural Resources" on the Assessor map. Deb 2 )," A � • w a ' i G 4 \ r' ..) , 4 3 x oL 3 r,yy V! . 1 v FOAM LSB Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR, HENRY MYREN, a single man, for and in consideration of Ten ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid,conveys and warrants to THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION the following described real estate,situated in the County of Jefferson , State of Washington: Government Lots 4 and 5, the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 2, Twp. 25 North, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; EXCEPTING THEREFROM a tract consisting of approximately 3 acres, which is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the E line of the Olympic Highway with the S line of Govt. Lot 5 (or said line produced) in Sec. 2, Twp. 25 North, Range 2 West, W.M., and running thence northerly along the E line of said highway to a point which is 693 feet northerly of said S line of Lot 5, measured parallel to the center line of said highway; thence E 25 ft; thence southeasterly on a straight line to a point which is 370 ft E of the point of beginning; thence W to said point of beginning; EXCEPTING any portion thereof lying below the government meander line; ALSO, Government Lot 2, the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 and the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4, and that portion of Govt Lot 1 lying S and W of the Dosewallips River, all in Sec. 3, Twp 25 North, Range 2 W of the Willamette Meridian; ALSO, all tidelands of the 2nd class, as conveyed by the State of Wash., situate in front of, adjacent to or abutting upon Govt Lot 5, Sec. 2, Twp 25 North,. Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, with a frontage of 37.00 lineal chains, more or less; the same being designated on the County Assessor's Plat and Description Book as Tideland Tax "B" in said Section 2; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Dated this 26th day of March, 1959. /) (SEAL) STATE OF WASHINGTON, 1 ss. County of KING ' On this day personally appeared before me HENRY MYREN, a single man, .-tv ma.'knuwn to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and a.y..Yclltowl dggd,that be signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the ' userilnd p•.irj+oses therein mentioned. CLVEN under my hand and official seal this 26th day arc. 19 9. . • N tart' ublrc in and or rh Sla e • Washington, r .iding a Seattle. a I Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• i 14.1. "z Millft 711111 a � � o I .:.• .:_ Legend Selected Features r JC_Rwds - W Parcels-H r * / { DNR FP Stream / ,, Classification i5 ti f ! t FF--.��1 .,l N•Nea{ah Habig dljj 1 I „4• Na-Walvis!!Nabax•PersFnol � •.,' Ns•Non{da NaMtat-Sssonal a1 S b�tand Ehoalua IT A I "`,'�_ FEMA FIRMS r ■ A ANI ® wpp 2013 Aerial Photos FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Apr 06 11:33:24 2015 _ http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.E srimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C lientV ersion=4.0... 4/6/2015 Gonna Frostholm From: Susan Porto Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:46 PM To: Mary Blain Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: site plan for BLD14-44 septic Yes, that is the one I put on your chair at lunch. It was in my file since it was sent by deb in may. Sorry for the confusion still pending decommissioning of the septic system on the site less than 100' to the surface water and the approval of the state sewer system to replace it. Deb is aware of this. S Original Message From: Mary Blain Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:11 PM To: Susan Porto Cc: Donna Frostholm Subject: site plan for BLD14-44 septic Is this the site plan you needed? Original Message From: DCD Copier- Front [mailto:hpcopier @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:04 PM To: Mary Blain Subject: i Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 1 .2,., s t x V ri II f 1i. -4&-S:JI y s --- p ...Z 1 °_ '�P'Y Nti _ /1 O r GN`f -u LO� ii "` ¢ , Jam° _ ` • n , mr...y_k r i 4.1 \ _ ,//,, I / , ... - ; ' Y : _ {�JV ��. .� Y \ r ♦ „40;,.- I I / w . Yoh IV 1 f I T ' '`'•k ,igi ; -g it y; _,,A., ..c.k■- _ - - 04 ♦ n` \• Y ri /Y "' T _• s �c •1 J■ 2 " / Y F[ .. Z . + of 1i - - 4 > yW ,_ w o Donna Frostholm From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:49 AM To: Mary Blain; Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: Permit review for BLD14-00044 fyi From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [mailto:Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent:Tuesday, December 30, 2014 8:18 AM To: Susan Porto Cc: Randy Marx; Denese Schauer; Amy Stonkus Subject: RE: Permit review for BLD14-00044 Greetings Susan, No problem. And yes, we are waiting for the septic system decommissioning. We are still on track to replace the Dosewallips State Park road culverts with a bridge and add the floodplain channel in the summer/Fall of 2015. Recent discussions with the Suquamish Tribe and WDFW have led us to change the bridge design a bit (adding 15 ft to the length) to ensure it meets the stream simulation criteria mandated by the culvert lawsuit. Arny Stonkus from Wild Fish Conservancy, will be sending the County a revised plan soon. Happy New Year, Deb From: Susan Porto [mailto:SPorto(aco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 11:33 AM To: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) Cc: Randy Marx; Denese Schauer Subject: RE: Permit review for BLD14-00044 Deb, disregard the e-mail below. I returned from vacation and looked through the case and indeed, we do have a site plan as you attached back in May. We,as you know, are awaiting the septic system decommissioning and the approval of the new sewer system prior to our approval of this case. Your prior e-mails(may 15th) indicated this project is on hold until summer fall of 2015. Sorry for the confusion. Susaw Porto R.S. ,Jef fersow Couwtd Publie hteaLth Phow.e 360. 3859404 FAX 360. 379.4487 ALwous WorleCrt.g for a safer§ Fteolthierjef fersoK.Couwtg CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 From: Denese Schauer Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 11:33 AM To: Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV Cc: Randy Marx; Susan Porto Subject: Permit review for BLD14-00044 A recent review of this building permit found no over-all site plan of the park and those septic systems projected to be impacted by this project. I do see an e-mail sent from you to Mary, Randy and Susan on May 20, 2014 that indicates a site plan was attached,with drain fields above with the permit number in red. I have been unable to track a copy of that attachment. Mary indicated that you may have also dropped by a hard copy of that site plan, do you recall doing so? Thanks for you help. Denese Schauer Environmental Health Tech Jefferson County On-site Sewage Program 615 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368 (360)385-9444 ext 407 fax(360)379-4487 SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary dschauer @co.jefferson.wa.us www.jeffersoncountvpublichealth.org CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 2 Donna Frostholm From: Susan Porto Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:16 PM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Scroll down to the one from May 15 for their time line. From: Randy Marx Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:27 PM To: Petersen, Deb (PARKS); Susan Porto Cc: Arny Stonkus;Jared Keefer Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Hi Deb Health can't approve a permit that conflicts with state code. Your intensions are great, however, knowing when the entire sewage system will be operating is an unknown. The sewage systems that are w/in 100'of a surface water or proposed surface water will need to be abandoned prior to health's sign off of the permit. Here is a better link, use it to make a list of all the "SEP" cases on the property. http://www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppouery/cm.asp?value=502021001 then go to this link and you can see a scanned version of the septic permit. http://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/WeblinkExternal/Browse.aspx?dbid=0&startid=468709 hopefully you can figure out which ones pertain to your project. Septic systems installed befor 1970 didn't require a permit and the state may not have permitted some of them anyways back then. All the of the system to be abandoned need to be documented as such in our files, this includes ones we have no record of. We have never done more than one or two at a time, we usually charge a fee per case. We will work something out when the time comes since you are doing them all at once. We will need some type of verification of the pumping out of each tank,that the tank has been filled in w/soil, a location on the property, and a SEP case number if applicable. We will need to be on site for some portion of the work. Last thing, you mentioned a $2900 fee, health's portion is$79. Look forward to working on this with you on this project. Zaxdv_ 1ltwxx Always Working Fora Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((°> > fir° ><( ((°> ><((((°> <(((("> - (f 0- ><{{"> ><»<> Septic Permits Online (Link) Environmental Health Web Site (Link) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This c ma;I n s- ,ye, a duciing any attachments, is fci the sole use of the intended reciplent(s) and may contain confideritia'. and privileged information, Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended -...a,cnt, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: AI]e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson Colin h'e-mail system and is therefore subject tc the Public Records Act a state law found at RCht 4136. tinder the Public Records lacy the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RC W 42.3ft 1 • From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) fmailto:Deb.Petersen(@PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:04 PM To: Susan Porto; Mary Blain; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Amy Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Hi Susan, I went to the site and put in the parcel number for Dosewallips State Park. Seven documents came up but none with the septic permit. I guess I don't understand. If we are telling the county that the drainfields will be decommissioned at least 6-8 months before our project, why this is necessary. Can't it just be a condition of the permit, that the drainfields are decommissioned before project construction?The parcel number is 502021001. Perhaps someone at your office could more easily find the old septic permit if it exists.We paid the county$2900 for this permit. Do I really have to be the one to go searching through county files for a 40 or 50 year old document? Please let me know.Thanks. Deb From: Susan Porto [mailto:SPorto0co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:02 PM To: Petersen, Deb (PARKS); Mary Blain; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Arny Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Deb, Until the systems are actually decommissioned, we cannot disregard the setback requirements for permits. To help you find records of systems you may want to take a look at the on line database of septic systems permitted in Jefferson County on our website. Here is the link: http://www.ieffersoncountvpublichealth.org/index.php?permit-files-online. Does that help? Susan SUSAN,Porto R.S. jef fersovc couwt Publ.C& lfieal.tlh Pllowe 360. 3859404 FOX 360. 379.4487 Always woriztwg fora safer Hi-eaLtkCerjef fersow cow/ad CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 2 • From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [mailto:Deb.PetersenPPARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:31 AM To: Mary Blain; Susan Porto; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Amy Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Good morning, I wanted to let you know that I checked with our SW Region Project Manager for the new Dosewallips State Park sewer system that is being installed this summer/fall and he confirmed that ALL the drainfields at the park will be decommissioned with the new sewer system being installed. As I mentioned to Mary,the fish passage project on Twana Creek will not be built until the new sewer system is completed and the drainfields decommissioned. I am planning on construction for the Twana Creek culvert replacement/fish passage project to occur in late summer/early fall of 2015. We have tried to find septic permit numbers here at HQ and I've asked the Dosewallips Park manager to look in his files, but we haven't found anything. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Deb Petersen,Salmon Recovery Coordinator WA State Parks & Recreation 360.902.8634 From: Mary Blain [mailto:mblain©co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:16 PM To: Porto, Susan (DOHi); Randy Marx Cc: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) Subject: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Susan, I am currently holding a SEP review for the above BLD permit to "replace 2 culverts with pre-fab bridge, etc" because the site plan (attached) is lacking the SEP permit#'s. There are currently 10 SEP cases associated with this parcel #. Debra of WA state parks (cced in this email) reported that the septics (she is thinking all of them) are being decommissioned, which is another project with another contact person. If the septic systems are going to be decommissioned, is it still necessary to label their permit numbers on the site plan for BLD14-44? Guidance is appreciated. Mary Blain Permit Technician Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4452 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us 3 All email to or from this email address may be subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. 4 Donna Frostholm From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:04 PM To: Susan Porto; Mary Blain; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Amy Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Hi Susan, I went to the site and put in the parcel number for Dosewallips State Park. Seven documents came up but none with the septic permit. I guess I don't understand. If we are telling the county that the drainfields will be decommissioned at least 6-8 months before our project, why this is necessary. Can't it just be a condition of the permit, that the drainfields are decommissioned before project construction?The parcel number is 502021001. Perhaps someone at your office could more easily find the old septic permit if it exists. We paid the county$2900 for this permit. Do I really have to be the one to go searching through county files for a 40 or 50 year old document? Please let me know.Thanks. Deb From: Susan Porto [mailto:SPorto(aco.iefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:02 PM To: Petersen, Deb (PARKS); Mary Blain; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Amy Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Deb, Until the systems are actually decommissioned, we cannot disregard the setback requirements for permits. To help you find records of systems you may want to take a look at the on line database of septic systems permitted in Jefferson County on our website. Here is the link: http://www.ieffersoncountvoublichealth.org/index.php?permit-files-online. Does that help? Susan SuSaw Porto R.S. Jef fersov&Couwt H-ealth Phowe 360. 3259404 Fax 360. 37:9.442 Always Worleivvg for a safer I-fealthierje f Fersow Couwtd. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [mailto:Deb.Petersen@PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:31 AM To: Mary Blain; Susan Porto; Randy Marx Cc: Donna Frostholm; Arny Stonkus Subject: RE: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Good morning, I wanted to let you know that I checked with our SW Region Project Manager for the new Dosewallips State Park sewer system that is being installed this summer/fall and he confirmed that ALL the drainfields at the park will be decommissioned with the new sewer system being installed.As I mentioned to Mary,the fish passage project on Twana Creek will not be built until the new sewer system is completed and the drainfields decommissioned. I am planning on construction for the Twana Creek culvert replacement/fish passage project to occur in late summer/early fall of 2015. We have tried to find septic permit numbers here at HQ and I've asked the Dosewallips Park manager to look in his files, but we haven't found anything. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Deb Petersen, Salmon Recovery Coordinator WA State Parks& Recreation 360.902.8634 From: Mary Blain [mailto:mblain @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:16 PM To: Porto, Susan (DOHi); Randy Marx Cc: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) Subject: regarding SEP review for BLD14-44 Susan, I am currently holding a SEP review for the above BLD permit to "replace 2 culverts with pre-fab bridge,etc" because the site plan (attached) is lacking the SEP permit#'s. There are currently 10 SEP cases associated with this parcel#. Debra of WA state parks (cced in this email) reported that the septics (she is thinking all of them) are being decommissioned, which is another project with another contact person. If the septic systems are going to be decommissioned, is it still necessary to label their permit numbers on the site plan for BLD14-44? Guidance is appreciated. Mary Blain Permit Technician Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4452 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain @co.iefferson.wa.us 2 All email to or from this email address may be subject to the Public Records Act contained in RCW 42.56. Additionally, all email to and from the county is captured and archived by Information Services. 3 Map Output Page 1 of 3 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map MVP IL1- I� i _ 7 rr I L't' s + 1 t ti.. E _ L_ d _.. 44 K i-.---'' ` 0.i m 31 'c.l / o ' T O J .// t t o 7 —L— — y i I '3 y, W • yl „ss.„ ' it ---- '1 i I viim'7 , 1 I ∎'. -- i - 4� 4 ` F ��. t _� IL r f o�„r, : http://gisserver/servlet/eom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C1ien1V ersi on=4.0... 7/2/2014 Map Output Page 2 of 3 Legend Selected Features e CR_Survey_pts CR_Survey_li nes CR_S urvey_Structures CR_Surveys ■ Heritage Barn Register Heritage Register Pts teasel/open Heritage Rogow W MIR and 0e of EhethiMytc * WIIR and National Regr.+^• Historic Property Inventory Archaeological Districts Archaeological Sites � I I Mons Archaoolagwal Resource meets the min loom National Register age threshold ci 50 sear: of age or outer but nes not teen evaluated by the SR PO le be Intent on the Slather National Reg Sets 1 Intorr atmn hat been gathered on the nrAone or peh teems resource.but has not been evaluated to be listed on tee State or Rational Reenters Yeti Resource has been evaluated by COO SII PO and determined not to be an anohaOPwq K.at tile Resource has been ova'.J athy by SI I PO and treats Inc vter a t o- ';:sted on the Nabors.a Rep:.: 7 Resource has been evaluated SIIPO but de not tract the criteria 10 be baled on the Helena: Reenter Resource Is I:stel on both Inc Stale and National Registers 1 7 Resource is listed on SR by be�nu l recognized f or is value and deermined a son dreant curio-a •esou rue el the state. Cemetery Sites bstorte Archaeological Rosa c_. -reeta the minimum National Reamer age t hreshold of 50 sears at see or*ow but nab not been evaluated by the SIIPO to be hrec oil one State or Nat renal Reenters Into-rotation has boost gathers an the nMINK or pram Mors resource.but has not been evaluated to be dated on the State or National Reenters. Resource has racor.Nd NHL Om..I Resource is IMtd on both the Stale and National Reenters 111yf-gl Resource is brad on SR by bond receipt sod for Its value and determined a se dsant cunu ra resdurco df t nc stale. Historic Districts t� Nat renal tiMone L.lndrNlR `�I WIIR and Nat■natRegMe Heritage Register Washington Harness Roemer OWIIR and Natrenal Regnter Township Lines A' JC_Roads Parcels-H http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0... 7/2/2014 Map Output Page 3 of 3 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Wed Jul 02 13:56:58 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0... 7/2/2014 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Review Type: Review Type: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD14-00044 Received Date: 2/6/2014 SITE ADDRESS: HWY 101 BRINNON, 98320 OWNER: STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR PHONE: 360-802-8634 PO BOX 42650 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2650 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: 4+ PARCEL NUMBER: 502021001 Section: 2 Township: 25 N Range: 02 W CONTRACTOR: WA STATE PARKS AND REC PHONE: 360-902-8634 PO BOX 42650 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2650 REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOP Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construct 50 ft wide flood plain and 1270 ft long channel TYPE OF WORK COM SQUARE FOOTAGE: COMMERCIAL: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: INDUSTRIAL: VALUATION 250,000.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: CODE EDITION: 2012 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: # OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: SHORELINE: GARAGE: CONST TYPE: SETBACK: DECK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: OSS NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: WATER SYSTEM: BATHROOMS: Exist: Prop: Total: Routing Date: Type Amount Paid Bv: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $2,077.00 MEB 11/22/14 145572 State Building Code $0.00 MEB 02/06/14 Plan Check $131.00 MEB 11/22/14 145572 Total: $2,208.00 1ltidernarlrldata1fnrmelE RI fl Ann 61I■1 ma* ?!a')'^" < X002 JEFFERSON COUNTY { DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'z 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment NSH I`eicG Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd at co.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Dosewallips State Park Fish Barrier Removal and Twana Creek Restoration Project will replace two culverts with a pre-labricaled bridge and construct SO ft wide flood plain and 1270 ft long naturalized channel. Tax Parcel Number: 50202 1001 Property Size: 425 acres (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Pro a Dosewallips State Park is located in Brinnon,WA off Hwy 101 in Township 25N,Range 2W,Section 2. P rty: Property Owner(s)of Record: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Telephone:360.902.9634 Fax: 360.586.0207 email: Deb.Petersen @parks.wa.gov Mailing Address: 1111 Israel Rd SW;PO Box 42650,Olympia,WA 96504-2650 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): ("1,J 1 11/ it S1"t.- &I i S ✓ -- A✓--1 y 5-4,4-7 Le,/S " Telephonec2LL.' 3 V9 -353— Fax: V email: „5 n fEi).> C*. co 1, d-s-f r Mailing Address: 65-2-I - fct la..iiret e /lot ,V. What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑ Lot or Road Segregation — IRBuilding ® Critical Areas Stewardship Plan- --,, lT T' � F I V I ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasontblt3dfnr :.d ❑ Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or CI** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"0"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)**J A N 3 0 %!?14 ❑ Change of Use ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment �/ ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach El Short Plat** .J ❑ Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑ Binding Site Plan** ❑ Propane ❑ Long Plat** JEFFERSON COUNTY ❑Sign ❑ Planned Rural Residential Dedelopni �-•let 1•-•-_!- ELO'M_ ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration'" ®Storrnwater Management ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Pennit Revisions** ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre-Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: US Army Corps permit; HPA from WDFW; ESA Sec. 7 Consultation;NHPA Sec 106 Review; NPDES Ecology Wild Fish Conservancy DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE M �J . Date: 47/5.1, 0/3 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the applic lion that he or s wants prior notice. Signature: Date:./V/.. 3 The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the ' "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable response lity Corr adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: ( .09-yt-vo Date: /6/43-01/3 07/24/2013 BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: (360.992.8634 (360.56.0207 MAILING ADDRESS: 1111 Israel Rd SW;PO Box 42650,Olympia,WA 98504-2650 EMAIL: Deb.Petersen@parks.wa.gov CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE (360.9)2.8634 FAX:(360.56.0207 MAILING ADDRESS: 1111 Israel Rd SW:PO Box 42650,Olympia,WA 98504-2650 EMAIL Deb.Petersen @parks.wa.gov Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: = New 7 Wood Existing: = Sewer = Addition = Steel Proposed: Bank Community System Alteration/Remodel 7 Concrete Total: Height: = Individual System Repair Masonry SEP Permit# _ Demolition = Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: T Private well Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: = Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants, employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: Underground Tank Above ground tank Size of Propane Tank: Heat Stove Cook Stove Woodstove Fireplace.nsert rehtO I evotS telleP I knaT retaW toH I Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines, tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH Bid App Review: 2"0 Floor Heated Consistency Review: It 1..1!..6. Other Heated Base fee: Mezzanine Additional Section: l G Heated Basement Plan Check fee: ; ,+J Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: t i Other Unheated Pot er -fee: Garage/Carport SUBTOTA . 1 5 --k--, STS:.> 4.-_1(.6,..).--1 0-( Decks 911/Rd Approach 28-- Other TOTAL: $041 4 4. ?, ' L,i,y,c_... . `GIZCj - Receipt Number: ') / (4--- Iv). t - Cash/Check Number: C ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: t `� •Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish f/ , 1725 0 occ, Initials: 07/24/2013 , . , • . • I J y • • 1,.... RI° 70 � a H 'u1 T O tii g 1. lir, h j A A&- L e ...:.4 . ›. Y,-1-; 7.210"41NOLN w g r''' till r 17:.a) $ .:. fi*V :•-':.,•.` eV > CrJ 4 r b ›. 6..H..4 "a- :84', D illiiiiwoorag - '''''..:-' )...1,1 O �y W! 1 1 \l co mo �F O �0 I N a ›, o w ..�� te; 4 z o CD o r Ill x r (----cif PARK BOUNDARY ,,A,,, '''' 8 H P n CA 7. y T'1 JI n X 0 °"' rill) H oyO $ „,k - F.I > co M z 4 H z / t• jib •=1,'- • • ' ->#4\ '',,1,:. „, . -. 3,. 2 z p:J 1 ;Ji A z in �� ,SP A r r 4 tit n� tl i sT = O r N> O D C m m K ` , Mmimli °O` m8 z V1 N Z o s-z n $ -0 0 0 0 0 h 03 M O ° m C 'fl nm"13 13 �i 0 p o 0 o � T.� o o 09 / A z6Do p D D .0 m � Z 4C. CA cn 0 CA ea CC m 2 < , (f �� CM , r......,.. , , ,:. i "4 •-•••.....••• ..,:;;.'i.. 0 W Iv N N N F-' 1-' F-' P-' -' W �-' t-' LO CO V C I In ..p W N F-' 2 �.y W fV r O kD CO V T In -> W N r-+ O r,� `/ N 4—, �Y I `� ` r z hal I. 0 V) n n n n n cn n n cn cn cn co CO n v cn cn v v H m o l4 ' xx ��• O ) . ` rn m � � rnrnrnmrn � mm � � H z � � I QX � n ( ' mmmrn tnr H H ti F� Y--1 H _, _, 1� Fti . rn O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 Pi RI D 7' m x `” - \ zzzzzzzzzzzzov, 3zrnrn � � = � z _ Z < < < < < < < < < < < < -I ' W N. z rnn mr� O -- ., • � In ray H H ru 1-1 H H H H m H H —1 r c7 rnrnmmrnrnrnmmmrnrnDrnO � O -i z � ,4 ' • c r H r- z OT O 0 0m - L) a z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z rn m C , °' O W W NJ N N r-+ 1-, 1--' ■--' up (n 1-, 11 I C� NI In ■--• V W 1--' t0 �I U, W 00 C', 2 I > of it .„ 6" A F W W W N N N r--+ r-' N ,�.} ., i , - ( �% \1 n S ° h t I �I -!> O 6) N O CO cn -A 1 -' D ? '� Z c LI ll 1 ‘5, e, c' m lbii lAT • R 4 O a r Z 0 1F,, m m W m6 ty r°_ trn Cn - Ifi.:pp a m 0 r- w fmn D W m m ;1:i Z m co co OD CA _. m m m m D �., ----- _,�• o A O o G� '�„� �/� m c x m m 13, 15. 1 t i� r 13 A m m x i cs)-m0 rm Z n m r� 2 < m S m r Z , r I ' :: m z / .r m re.S /,�m r1 r xU' mm � ;. m & JO o cux_i , O r ? p <1 i m o /O/� L/� 6'92-.1 'gc l: m m O - M >z m r T-_ <r AZp'^ z ��" mm - HI! Z-i 4. m n / ' r"1Z T TT/ DL r � o Z m z c, e 0 0-1 m • r 'q 74p, 0- r o � I I. q O • c � A O e ' i n. A CO H I b m 70 rO ( m O n D / v,c > o v w y -1- u,G� ��n el r‘ r n� r ' 4- 4 fp DL , ' P 1 , 8 Z W %:' . , ti .,. , , 6:7'''.4.:1 6'6: v ''''ll' 'c■Ci.„/ 1411111k 4110 \ itL p IrJ/ o m r >m / / /, A C / 3 mm -0< N cN I m< O m . ,"� / a O D m cr) O !n m cN �... - Z N °" o �d MNcJ��1 U) Z n fN E S jN /1,m x x mZ 3 /5 N / Zm cn 11 -- l J f /'-' . - r, -N Tb> g t^ X > `b CI G m n Q n_ n m W � f z > H CD ° z o Ofil 70 7:3 -{ O Z X `! 1-r. Z 1D > w ` m cr Cry �-. co 0 - oo ° pn _1 m v: a 7. m , _ -i =1 m Dtkm � D �� O z o z O O O ` NJ Z , Al - Ntr RfV NON, TNT PIT'. I-' I 1J,OC F \ 1 l Y \ O r I ./....:\is „., , tr/ i) ip,i 1, 5,( L rO/ 1(1 1 1 i rc-'-' '41 i' fiiii lit 7.„:.Nir- il 7-1 / 'a :MIT t -2 r f� '/�� ilk 1 m GI X in m Fi � �t r ��0 o %%/////'//, d. /4 r- -0 ), ril 0 8 .• 11 1 I ft (?(( . i 1 I 7 2 < V A m , r '. ?5" :�� X11 m 40, z z m D (1 xi m r / m - 1 - o z m N z ` 1p r: '�� ' ''��I O TJ r 1/1/ m r A 2 i m �! 1 - mm / / 1 j�CD■ OW, / 73-1 l /ill/-- -//)//j1/1 , , 11� • li I i r� SSA/j// �.M • , l 5.......t 1 ro m/ J , _ . _ m_ �''% �,/ �jC / / ' 0� A /rll ��J ,,.......>-;;.,,—, r tea^ ,0 'c^, 'i r-/ A r \~ __ -_• ri...., m� ( � ; 6,50 / 6.1 7_i \1 / �- } /7/7// /Al - AP3//111 i ,,:',-, / i / ' t.i 2 f., ,, ,, ‘,,,i, \-. i • Om�� /• G (q m0 f l c A ■ ,k / r o w C� 440 Ac vm - n �. N CA. H. <o .. 1 m r / I/ �� / I m nD' ,,.SH `f n ��n � t r te ' ON, ).� 1 ...J. 1 -� / r / 1 . 7i l , 11 (� �/'f l '' 1 . m ,--- ._ — - I —I I ' m C) - / 7 m y W / ti n WI Z 70 77 D � 0 y d X > ZDj, '. o 0 mm � n .� O `� ( X p -1 _ m - D v r 7 ',•_ Cl) m � D # m -aD 4, H C) O = � viOf > r O 6 m ° O � 7 z O z m zT � z� v Nx A: ►/ m NO annanaS IM_ Al-p OFrF ) \ ? , \ \ .,. _ _ m°m / ) m�� �. V V \omPO' tt t \ 2' n' I ( y p \ vm l�i �� � � a13'�'J� mV \ I ` ` l `,� 4 1 X 0 I ( \'''' 2 tr'', 1014D ''\''''..\\\:\\ •\ \ k 1 \-• (J \ 1 1 . l ( m m D Z r ��� V - :' ' r \ ` zT J hU;00 1 ® � s 5 OM a �- 9 z➢i �L 2 mO \ ..\ \\s Z OO-1 y m r. . '\\ X5 0 r2oz 2 r 1 F F ‘1'',� V �,Vi � l 1 y VA_ A O Uri �o z 1 ��PF, , i yx n o m '� y m° ) Z2 ffl � Rl � ,'�\\ �\ ,•‘'s 7.M A -x�. -- Z O co Z \\\\\\\,\\ � � �� � 4 m o m ` '"C-� GI Pi G7 �tp m D m m - ``` \ ,\,`,, ,i, 1�l�` A m o f / I 7: � ?70C \\11i1\1 1 rte' �� v- ' n Ai R1 X ,� ��� �, \\.\ L •• m z m o —I 'n D r k�, \, \ \. wR� \ , „ \ 0 M- r- --1 n ,/zi/ ))1\\ ) .\1,1 .-§AI:9' /1 E , x H > cH P , i ` { aw v ,, Aip,,A.:1,A. n x, v. nm: ,� A VA m i�/ / ,/- -fie O o m 1 \�■ \ \ \'� m 9 (,)- G' • > 1 ) 1))`,\:-.,\ ,,- \\\ . . mom . ,\,,,,w ,,,i. -. N ‹To zy \ C 1 \ \ \\\ 70, I \ zo I x rrn, ��h I mmx I *Aa � � f �__ ®`���� / mm=) 1050 =� � � '%�I �� ,, �'�>�AV � ti V ipm� OD 8//,, Am a TAo O Z s f l o o {� ��i.�� 'R�ic. �+! G7 0 m T / j / o m r t 6 /� , c �^ __win f CD 1 / ///n, 1/ill 1 \ti\ A 5--1 r % 1 ( /(,/(2(, \ ,I 2. -1A m 2G1 CO CO W m ` , o ti. \�. ril- mFm > \ '‘. \ l' F rn< ?7,. /::'- • '/' 'i ((( 0 \ '\ \�,X15 m D n \ `�M1 1 ;sm± / i//`: 1' 104.00 Ai Z V r Z 9 V O p tl 2/ , 1' s\•I \I \ t C \ .11,* %,”- m'- o ilk ,. ___, ,, , , , , ,, . , ,, ; ,. ,... . ,.. , ,,..Q -I CD , rn , )) ' ii ) m N / 4 m `r' O • j/ 111 \ ■ X D 'b z T m m D � a - c _n XXX > U' o n C7 U' a tDi� __ A � 3mD >—I rn x p m o o o x n rn � n D Z •2 11 -J m � n4* m 73 D ✓5 H 0 r- z z Zoom � � Z Ni'i. PI VI\10r: IN! AM PAX ---) / I ; i ))))I j) / lit , 0 \„, i (I/( I (( / / j ( I �I y II m ti��\j/�' £ ..,, ( ■ \\ ( \ \ (I ( \\\� ç( çj1':iR , -,,t E,,› , c.,, e i . .,,,, 4 v r II Z m jrAm DD � I 1 ,� N 5,9_,,,z v ` � 11A m Ox C' ') O3I) I !H\\ \ �. �\�` (fmmni mil! it \ v �v mm �i 0 .1�1pT�i �m0 %1\ 2,x A� =<1. 1Hk( \ 1 � \ mo iv ! i I ����� ! IIti1 /( ( ( (( _ ) ;t ▪ l fn ,Ir- r I t▪ ) ). l Zr Q O 3 -i �fA if (p Az 1 fi ---- 0+ \ , , ,._, z.„, ! tv I , ,�� - �� _' 9(00 3 m r(P) m m r A -----i---X 0 K i it U0 m F ,, ,,, ��w \ m 1 e \ \\ '�� pm -.-x J O - i\ / ‘,.., , , , \ , ,? , S 0, . FIZZ ID m _ n, .. b. v v'.,, �� 1 m ( Io m �� A O , , , , \ „\\,, , ,, ,, , ,� s1IwI• ��I� m tom m m i � t � ; I T,2 l m It , , t t p C m f I I ' 1 �t p m ■ I 1 m mcx :� ! � 1 I I' , hill ' i v . 0 z 1 1l\`1 'I . 1I � , t 8 ! 18+ 111 I .�f r ' n 0 44 ` I 590 zTi 7 (/ ro� J ,/,�J 1! ,f I f K Zr m l o l''I it / �� i` m�0 , 7+50 , 0 II 1 m I If iliii Illiki\i; <m �r l 11 ( 0 it m 3 z _ I 1 +' ra O m 0 / k �x0 — T _l ( ) °�c c c m ) n z i I p y A m m r 0 11) n z O I �` , A A O A O O D m �� DO9 7 n m m Off\ t� m v c P c r m \\\ - �l r v m O . \ z _ m rm z -I n o M O r -p n ` O / /� m D --I I Z m N z 1, t�' 6x5 f z 14.*$ S X11 m \�„. , , 0 �t,. i ) ,,., 7 m 0 , ‘-- Zzv W ` I !I J /t//;) ( if , I i 'r(/l7/ill/ll, (I� t . ,��I , - / I .- -'/ /fa / � v n /” > `CJ n f n z T1 )7 '� a 5 - 0 n m cn xi 7j '''' O O TJ C7 `-I .�.', 8 a D N -1 vvVI3 � D Dm 1 Cr1 a'. c�i, Om oo < zn rn � y C _ 7l U mDD *p -0 D 5 O -0. D qdn � � D � O O z Z zzzo � � � � Z 7 `'� ^' _ kit NO FFVN.IONS INT APP 1)4TF � s..Ai \ - , / i�A �, q �� } I \\\ � �� �� �: � I ; \m I �,moI5 V� I .._� 1 A ` I I O S'�D ' t 0T,�(� ��' zma 00 ( ... fL 1 J i \ 1 \. ion }� 1^ ) n `�`. o N ?o i �m 2 r 1 \ ‘\I \ \ \\3 \\ )\ 1 I ,. } m \ Ii I iii, ` 1 r ki K( \\\:, � , ;;, //, . , . . ,,.. vVA�. \\� // ���AOC b O \ iL!II S iii 0 ( AT2' / '/4m me �� 1 2sA C +rX p 002 m i Z D D moo �� �� ��, r ` Zoo~ I 5+5�, �f , > > ��� i I� 1 5 10 ,, , / / I 1 ,'i 1/1//V//7/7 1 (-( ‘ . fili ,,,,. . „,/,. ,, ,„ ,/, / ,.. vir 4401 0. ... ,,,(\ t,,c(\,,(\,; (\c(( 1 . t ,. . , , < \„\\,.\\\.\\.\\ \„\ \\, , 1, ,,, \ . . , i • . \ „, ,. . \ , \\‘‘‘ ..\\ , , \ , . . .. \1 ) \ ,\,,,,,,,.\\\\,,;,\-\ \ \ \ 1 ,_ il I _ . .,.. 1 ii , , , , , \ . 1 , , , -) r-ii. ,. ... 1:\\\\V/ ''" 1 //lb/, 7 1 _ .• I ' � ------'----'e' ' \ ‘... a \..,,, j t 7 � [i'I' 1 `� �✓j I , t i 0\ ._S ) i 1 i j. , 0 ) , ) 1 , 1 I v'� . 7: iv \■1 i I , } % �� 111 \\\ .:r. .i vct a} y Dix `s ■1 ; i ,\\\ ZI!' ?iy tt ow .I, i 1 t oOnm ` rA ° m -n lIl\I , V' c z ! X00? ° �m r , j� m .� 0 9rm . v 0114 ) mx G I 1 Iyi v, } I �� I 1 m � mmr 1 I{�1 A To mmr 1 �x„, .. , m m m m m \\1 1 o- A -a-� C C C T I I 1 ) T A ! / O O z if m m m m D ��1\��� .; ? , a� J / //l o" ,<oo v o ��ii, v l mom! 3% p ��= m C x r Ti i I I 1 A / ! m [n m O ;6,52 r -,.(0) RI 1 I .. 4 ,A // )( xk-1X m D n O l � I 1 � I� a 1/ oy33 n' m Cr) - 1 ))) m , mmr M r m m r 2 I ( /j 1(I ( k � �ll /f; f 3�mm I I 1 zS O m D ; I i 1 I ��m2rm s , 'I /,, mm -ir } ATmO cn CD m `i\,\, `pK9n rrs , � ( / 7/ , ,l ll r� , ■l � l � �` 3+�0„ ,, , i , o , . �, p,, ' '' � H ( ; I 1 ���. `, , 1 1 , ,. ,,, ,;, ° R '-': n n b n 77 > -c, H S' x E s T W O z y ' � D W —� v Vl 3 Z D ( ) CTl C/) rn , m D Fri _.• Om oo ° < o r�n � v: ”. z T; _ -nom mDr m -0 D ✓ G7 � D goZ � ri > n Z O O z z �- z Z Z ° rnv, � V) N = Ott . m N� VIvrSIONS fHr A00 an 12 Y// ////ø///2/ / 0 � �/ ,::(//r/(',/:11:•',/',./1//'//',/,//3 I /� mac i r m %'i i 1 / �• Dnm 1 / JI m'r"m� ../ 1 1 I W m J m ( /3 mom '�� t_xi O O 0 12 a>x I O / / 0 N O m m 1 mOZ� / �$ /C ;0 r T // mi=,m 2 it /D / / / m m I � Z x m /i S < A :U m 0 Z m > > �" z j 1 ..1.- /1�,��� -_._� 2 o i I ‘) ill m Ell I2+°0,1 %� 11 V\ i ( ,, ,,, 4!kf4 Ao C4' i ilig :° C4(j\— — -----'-\ \ 1 1 / ,,.,- ..//, ,,,,' --,'' , i ii, i \ \,., ct, -v■ </ j i c , Vir i 1 , //7:7,i,-.,j////:///7 ,,_ r r-T-1 I ' -■:, \./ i,,,,/,/,,,-1/ zz , \N\ \ /7 1 //I zk �0 J r -- N r, nzx ON C 1(i///(�// 1 'l1 °,~ �i II 11 JJ `, �.AA� /;�/ ,-/ A- ) , ■ \\ Yi ' ' 1 -1- ) ! /� / :///'/ %� /.i , ,f5,,,.f _7 / ,77:-.7 --;\/ P) ( f )) / c S 7 , ) ,/,/,::0,"•/, ) i f /744/7 / ,,,, ,. ,,,///.,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,-;----,:-_,T__ ,, ,__- t / m \..? './ / / A 1 - f, '1/4 - 'r, ' // i , 7,,----„,,,, (l , , , h.---c' CI ' , ° �\\� (m m v N '` T, n c 1. j v = F f L ' y H D z P p 0 p Y �mrn v) • 0 oo ° zn m � cr H i' � D ,* n, _ � D q n � � DD O 4' x a_ / Z CA (f) i c. . I +: fit Ni: b!'� EFNISIONs IN r. ANN nnTF Ali • 00 LA+50 c 0 o e d t^O t dW'; ON CD I 0 0 D ■.r� . C c m =i m � 0$1S. 00, O Z o / \�O � Zs c w i m �' -� w m ':jls �r` ccE m 00 106 6 cn O /' 6q oO 0 is b m t o / °1 .4 tom- `; 0) 00 nit te SO `�\�� ��,��{ ( i , , .0) 600• \.\Q\-'''':i \ �; a m`'' / j" • 000 Ilk f i ``\ „ A edQ.. , . / x z 2 0 vO 111I t1 !bhd 1f !}J��II�;' oo / /0 t �r���t,r � ( �, .oi, 0 0 /1° O -1 - z z ,// / i // 1 /I , 1 ��l��l l ,t Ja°;;i24 t O Zm / i�/� �m r 7., r c m a O v- ' i- Z rn �0 O r - 6 � .° u t-p L! iLa& : __.<=I -3< ^' ` fl /�/` /l',I1'( / ! FX i PLO" ,,,fiv J;' *-_:, `{ � n , 0) 61) Z � rook- r ? O me - i.roz 0' 0000 I- 0 �/ To � n ; 0° 01;0 ewe s •$o c0m Zm / 000 Q°�P®tlp°1rs~fir,/ L4 Sp r` ■ f e - tk. O / O i O m e •0�, 4 O l oa�°r #�Ry! 5 I m . iv CO o a � ; A /o , E � � A se a ors ,. 7 ,kb � / 3 � 00e ry,OO 0 oe, I60° Cn U o M XI Ch CO �o p,,-&d • a `; z* ' / 0°' 'ter _� ...V y_, X ° , 'fmm O'. 0041 , it 1411146'. , , co 1 oe de / •fie' �', °• /co S n/ � a �.� Cam. .,� c A , / �- ° %e c �, c O ,q0 M 0 to 0 1 f i % OP w I 0 t- M A o W +∎o `. 71 w y • d d 1\) / 0.0 ' 01 -41( N m K \-rif CO l •OOD u Of w z , n 7 5 s $ D Z vm3pz DO a lZ ✓ �- �_ CO -1 O 77 O p z n -I rn :n 7 _ 0 M > r rn r D .-3 C z D zoo ' T � ; � 7 r Z N = ,. di. rKl. HWIVOP,S IHI. APP IA 11 . , . . . . . , rs,■ ,....1 4.1 (..) r',..-) r-, .. 1 1 I 1 I + ......=1 I i i._I...... i ■ i. I 4._ A....,t_4 r-.1 1 ' 0 S 1;14 )__1 0 (0 -II I C — II'.II Z a c) v) r Z Z 0 0 r..] ._ 1) 1 i 11 rt, r i 7.. CZ .:4 ..,11 , ... m m [ x x m H o x m < M --I •> Z 0 —4 --.1 73 r- M 5 o m 77 rn G) --I LI 17 < > O xrn Z ri --I > II 0 rn C) * 0 > m <r. cn ill M , m ou 6p- -,- --41_ xl 4.4 . )04, .- • .•4_ y, I 0 l/) 4* .. = M 4...1 r C3 0 C/) • , -n I 0 --I rn rn n .. X) 1, I 7C) [:::::ii 4.714;71.7 t I ..Z 0> r- r•ri m > > ..., f.2,xi, . I i I ICI r- " ---t z F 111 ,;', ■ .4...-E"-') .1 rn rn z cn 1 m m E x co -&-, > --I z 2• 0 In 0 0.1' 11-1 7.) Z 0 m z 4'4 ''I , ■■ —1 > 0 i.4 --1 rri .4 i4 , (...) F rn cn o w > i co > 0 mm 0 m c Z c z m -1 mm o > co cr) co i --1 z m x 00 m 5 c 0 z > -4 cn x -I G) n --1 z z --I > (J) F M G") rn 73 z 0 .07) 0 1, , '4 -+ (.4 -.4-t C " . I 1 1 .., WT-1 cm I o x 1 m '1 2 o > co (7, ni z > 0 o 73 mm E cn Cr) Li m• 1 ( .• 'V M CO > M , '..k. rn ' X K , 4 5 co 0 H I m m m 0 (C 1 0 71 N) r_11 (A) - ■-...- ;9 v. n 7 ■?. (....; X > "c, r•A ,':;, rt^' ? ',,s-. g 0 ,r1 > 0 r- Q 0 H 71 Z Z z 1, z o ,.c) :_., 0 c71 -, V) . .. \ - NO rTF VISIONS IN T APP 11411 co A 5 O m CD In u, c3 j Z O Z m 0> m � m m O A X Z x D O D � v> rn 0 z > Zp_ A - - co D m0 O -ICA 0m Mr Dom mD czi� c � � -1m zD p � tn O I ii nzm O DO zi > mi = 0 7cn1 CO r Z = mr D D = D cn > > rwA N = m W m co co• m mD0 D mmcD RIO in fD" 7W,700 m A -im z 0mw rn o or � Om X v _ O n m cf)mzQ r- mr . <'� r•-/ `- 0 " O mcn0 -im0 R m > 0 i Z CO ��, - z m i; p m C ' ice 7 012 mm O m c y .4 %` , ' cn -1 O j m m e�� C s y � 1�tH(8 •0 0 r0 CO A -i` n 0 c m W V D . �k D a m ! PJ O % _ 1 O \ . • � � '� � O D m D f\,,ti w ii \ ti '1`�r -m !mi DO OD cn ITI r-D W Z \\mil • xi O m D 0 ( ,..1 i A co m co �, m `'fi!! j _ m 0 X ;kite (o °o ' j II, il[ frr z rnm ` j3 S — ir ' °' Om K m :% �` _ OcD m �� � � i1 11 co o n m y,..', Ii A x D m %\/ !iL I o A v —1 \ :� mDZ m co J,va! — ii t' 111� ,1 cn c� n 0 (t -1 O / I I m HI ' 1.r...n : ; , ' A A G m I D~ G,/` I O 4 D , � O m mCnm �� y V.45 � w M ?Z r m n p m O N. r O A X m T i, A z z CO > (r. „„-....,\:<,..,,,,- - '-„,„,:,,,,..,-,..•\\_:\...,:„,4\\,,, \--"<,,,v \"., I 1- m > Z I v O -1 m r t �� 12 CDn ri N r <n - n r = I I A m -1 m v Z m N W c E CI) m n'o R F. n Jj p 4 0 y. L'• "• .' �, O m z D H > 22Ec9 o m — oo < pn z - 0 < m D 7:' D __ 0 rnm r-`� D o � > p O O 0 0z ., 70 .-r z z o N z Z z rvn 1,rV1l1ONS IN" Apr, nnr, - O r 0 m m fil r p O OZ m O 0 m .< XI 0 (7 m pm O D n O 0 55 O 6 r c 00 mcn oaf pG� Z Cmn � Ty r =-i r m co n N z hOwf. co .-0 m + m Z 2 �'� '•,\,� 0 D OOn 0 D d :,'\.�LJ Cfl r m 0 x r X O n xi N �j e. 1 ∎,, O II F O 71O v O 33 I1 ! i1l � ccn-, 0 < � .; � � c m O –, -10 O r M m I 1 m D z � - ._m i. mores F O 1- O D D c � O ;' O < ry 0 - � m < cn k ' I - " '° H D f F. r s "' r _' z I — NC mi O x is �X mco (n • ■ m ou Z D o 0 • D Aw + D T < T T m D m E1r =m -0 D O r D m Zm= 0 > mm O =m I y zo i D 0 m rt m z • ; r (n '� c D M c � >11 (no D n • X m D /\ ; / \ m mCmi i,. \\ r i ! O m >--4 ,..-> > . co cn \ \r cn\ / m cz' ,\ / \ P r ,.1 C i \/ / /\�\ ; �J\ `/ H m/ / � / I m / / / // 17..) ,---d/ / ' C \ / \ I m0 < g „ \\ 4 mCC b 4 3 .s. \t• . Vij `.ti I�rh1!N L1_ N �' x \. m m { r n 1 C/1 , �I I (n z r CD_ .1_i_, I, Om /�'/ I m n M co > T ! s o CD r cn 0 o _TI m ti D CO n g n 2, c o r, � a -� � m 0 T J rh 2 > H ,p T N T O Y n < D cA p 0o x0 rn n D H Z zo � � 7K 1:) ” z N = 1 NO. REVISIONS Oil epi+ run II 1 1 ; i 1 0 1 1 I I 1 1 J I ■ 1 F- il I I i / /. c2, I L) / )1) t I 1, 1 I t— I , rn Ell � � N Q 11 N W 3. n > b C/1 S',, 9rytJ� -p1 ° rn y �` ,'i, Z Z 2 0 cn m � mmxz D ° un Pi 1 12 O m m D y A Z D O O O m z z000 � X � z z `\ FrI NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE V 4; 0 O W ' 1 V O , / 0I (1 [i, I I r,n a I ii I I I 1 1 v C1 0 j . 1 N (.x) w y T N rri ° 1 A cA <n 1 I 1 1 N {_ O L W I.C • W1 1 N ^ 0 0 I X O x V) ■ 1 ° 0 I o - H'� I ]> tom' N 4 1 1 { R? - i o J VII m r 1 m - L . H w 1 O -n 1 N co °n - cn n y. b cn g o Apia � � n , < �_ --I 2 ° pp r 0 rn � I- � > C.)O M -0 r '-' y 0 m z U, zv . N , � n S kiN illi 7 = NO. REVISIONS INT. PPP. DATE - - - - n+ ', '.__. .. ... _....._.......... ...._...�..l....-_......_......_1 N A { 1 p _ ' 1 1 1 ii 1 1 {{ I D 1 ) .,t, ;,:," a ll ' , I i 1 � ; 1 ,. . f A _ o 1. L....._.._.....i.L......- L' : rl....... C? 1{ 1 h 1 I I Et I (�7 T I 1 '..,P',•;; o I m m i 1 O ,, N W A el , 0 i c ., 6 PI D m dpiO �1 D (n f?7 CA-Irn vl-pD .fir n Z O z . �n z p - ZI N = '. is All g NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE ro w 0 T 0 - ► O Li, A I I ► N I ""e, i N 1 l ./ \ I \11) j , n, l I\\11) 1 I 1 j 1 i ''' ! 1 1 Up I m m H cn 0 m N CO 0 iii r 6 > > _ 1 p o < Xi m * V) H 0 Z m M p O qdDt8x y � o z z Z z CO zo � � -0 O z o= ,N ' Rt i { AO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE . RI h 1 i /f// 41 I t 1111 . , ) � i I I , Q l 1 1. l I I T 1 LJ Y al I ∎J\ 1 C. iI 1 i rj4 I U" r I a , I , ; I ? I i ■ i I u, j 1 i r 1 I I D 0 m H vi h� 0 0 < Mi a _ —I 2 ° pp r .-3 D. C)° O r1 O O 0g z q D8 DE O • , z zovp z z i \77 NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE • r __, o o � c I. ) W A i i n 0 -I j w 0 +. n, 1 o I \,,,,1 h ; N I I I \ 1 1 1 o 1 I m 2 m m 0 m N) C.,.) s i g o k- C� � H4 o o z D � 0nd Y � e co 74 vm3mD DO CR 117 Bi co a 73 0 I —1 � � › * x D 3 n -. H z zz � 0z ∎.1i b Z Z a Z NO. REVISIONS INi. APP. DAIS I I LL, I. 1 1 I r ■ . , j 1 F, , 1,.., 1 x; ,,,... 1 ,,,, 1 i � ;�� _ I I j 1 1 1 � i I r i I a + I v rr i I ' 1 I ;r. ■ J ' ■ (I) I m m H CO 0 m N co F D \ J a v 4 n i i i O a T R1 � mm � O m � o Co n 0An � * cn a p m > 4* m p D n co H O m r P z z � OZ ° " XG O O Z Cn z � N Z' Z r�, ,f 1- NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE R W A 0 n _. - L 1 —r_1. 1 , J , N il o ° o p 0 0 f`///III N N 0 Y ? 1 1 1 K W n (A I i r>,, I n1 1 111 il I 1 , I i I „+ L1 1 1 1 1 N of I j `e b .j i A j m m H CD 0 m N W 4 0 '5; > _ z,, cn R1 13m3pn Dm vn r'rl �� =O o m � D *prn -CPD C/3 721 y . Z 0 zoLo � � � Z z 21 .14: � Z cri NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE A• o n c ., r c Yom.- J . r J L, I i 1 . no , mi C.)] I 1 x { V. / T} , I 1 I a 1 \„1 1 1 U 1 I 1 • 1 1 { 1 1 144 1 ■ r n I 4 ITt 'U E: I O 71 N CO x z z O J CZ ti O 6 = o ° n W po v Rm � y a m D 3 r 5 0 73 (.11 .. .1 o Z qua on Dr O p Z oz , , � Z Z < \ z o• NO. REVISIONS INT. APP. DATE 31v3 'ddv 1N1 SNOISIAJM ON O -� \ , In N Q a �C LLrnoz d'.'> , Z Zi J c Y Oni z O Z 0 � � Q a O c.., # Q O E r U a > O O ~ _ w z w a W g O ~ Q ¢ � o[ CO Q� O m z 65 12 co N U- 0 I- N H W W �I V) \ i ' t I l J - 4 ! 1 : i n' :n vr (XCu o U y' I .µ 1-`) N F 1'.1 I v i ..=. 0 y. 1 t II II II II • II I II•II I III II. I 31V0 'ddV LNI SNOISIA3N ON E o = bh O o 6 C; w > I W d pr w v)V Q ci ILI w � � W 5 i' lbb C% a¢..■ Q U J O. s cc CO N U- 0 N N I° W W I U) C I.7. I I. I. N U I N (l 1 . Il J ' Kl 1 , k ch 1 K.I. 1 r 'Cr:‘ Vi 1 ) I 0 M CV CO O v9 1 0 CU I I c, 0 0 0 — D V) V M N ^ O G O H ) ti I- ( - - I ;Y, j f u 1 , tr N S. \I ' J VI v ,. 31VO 'ddV 'JAI SNOISIA311 ON ` e,- = N Z ' ' d Y LT; Z u)) .Z Z J Ce Y ^ ° Z 0 O a & p G O¢ p v� ¢ w Q pr Q 1.re a. M N U- 0 cY) N I- LJJ W 1 I i U) L. - L.4) G O v F ' / u r: f u,�._ ; I . I `I >- f .1. Q <i H- 1- h. (- D En 1 1Z I in f X I I y n G r t r---l--•.. Y_ (J O 0 Q M N ..` AGENCY USE ONLY Date received: US Army Corps WASHINGTON STATE of Engineers. Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: Application (JARPA) Form1'2 Tax Parcel Ns): USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW. Part 1—Project Identification 1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) (help] Dosewallips State Park Twana Creek Fish Passage Barrier#997962 Removal ai ct ROttdka von'Prgject l I[�".\•\ JAN 3 0 2014 t Part 2—Applicant , The person and/or organization responsible for the project. [heir)] i JEFFERSON COUNTY 2a. Name (Last, First, Middle) DEPT.OF COMMUNI IY UtvE�OPMENT Petersen, Deborah 2b. Organization (If applicable) Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission 2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 1111 Israel Rd SW; PO Box 42650 2d. City, State, Zip Olympia, WA 98504-2650 2e. Phone(1) 2f. Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail (360) 902-8634 ( ) (360) 586-0207 Deb.Petersen @parks.wa.gov Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at attp:Owww.nws usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Regulatory/PermitGu idebook/EndangeredSpecies.aspx. • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county government to make sure they accept the JARPA. 2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to http://www.epermittino.wa.gov/site/alias resourcecenter/jarpa iarpa form/9984harpa form.aspx. For other help,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at(800)917-0043 or helpXf).ora.wa.gov. r Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this application.) [help] 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) Stonkus, Amy, Edward 3b. Organization (If applicable) Wild Fish Conservancy Northwest (formerly Washington Trout) 3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) PO Box 402, 15629 Main Street 3d. City, State, Zip Duvall, WA 98019 3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail (206) 349-3955 (425) 788-1167 N/A stonkus @comcast.net arny @wildfishconservancy.org Part 4—Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. Consider both upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [help' ® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. ❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know, contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization. 4a. Name (Last, First, Middle) 4b. Organization (If applicable) 4c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4d. City, State, Zip 4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail ( ) ( ) ( ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [help] ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) [help] ❑ Private ❑ Federal ❑ Publicly owned (state, county, city, special districts like schools, ports, etc.) ❑ Tribal ❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR) — managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E) 5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) [help] 306996 U.S. Highway 101 5c. City, State, Zip (If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) [help] Brinnon, Washington 98320-9690 5d. County [help[ Jefferson 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [help] 1/4 Section Section Township Range NW 1/4 2 25N 2W 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [help] • Example:47.03922 N let./-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees-NAD 83) 47.687864 N. lat. /-122.902694 W long. 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. [help] • The local county assessor's office can provide this information. 502021001 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) [help] Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel # (if known) Henry Nelson P.O. Box 245 502023022 Freeland, WA 98249-0245 Wayne Hoffman P.O. Box 4 502023016 Brinnon, WA 98320-0004 Sue Perley 307103 US HIGHWAY 101 502023015 Brinnon, WA 98320-9712 Donald Kimball P.O. Box 123 502023020 Bonny Sue Kimball Brinnon, WA 98320-0123 5i. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. (helpl None. 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. [help] The project is located on Twana Creek (a tributary to the Dosewallips River estuary) 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help] ®Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. [help] The project is located within the campground area of Dosewallips State Park. Twana Creek runs alongside the entrance road to the park and is flanked by trees that include big leaf maple, Douglas fir, red cedar and red alder. Blackberry, salmonberry, sword fern, salal and other understory vegetation form a thick riparian edge along the creek. The adjacent campground is a manicured lawn with clumps of trees dispersed throughout the campground. Twana Creek is a seasonal stream and flows underneath Highway 101 through a box culvert into a tidally influenced channel that is part of the Dosewallips River estuary. 5m. Describe how the property is currently used. [heir)] The property is used by campers year-round and is part of Dosewallips State Park. There are paved and gravel access roads nearby and adjacent cleared areas used for campsites. The State Park is used primarily for recreational purposes. Dosewallips State Park is a 425-acre, year-round camping park with 5,500 feet of saltwater shoreline on Hood Canal and 5,400 feet of freshwater shoreline on either side of the Dosewallips River. The park is unique in that it offers both freshwater and saltwater activities. All camp areas are grassy and located in scenic, rustic settings. 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [help] Adjacent properties are privately owned residences and small businesses in the town of Brinnon. Large tracts of private timber property and forest service property are to the west of the park (upstream). 5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current condition. [help] The camp has 100 tent spaces, 40 utility spaces, one dump station, three restrooms (one ADA) and two showers (one ADA). All tent sites can handle RVs, but do not provide hookups. There is a guard station for fee collection and reservations. A maintenance building and shed are also located on the premises. The project involves removing two corrugated metal pipe culverts underneath the Dosewallips Park entrance road on Twana Creek. These culverts are fish passage barriers and are located where the entrance road makes a turn to the north. There are two septic drainfields that will be affected by the project. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [help] The project is located in Dosewallips State Park, in the town of Brinnon, Jefferson County Washington. The park entrance road is located off Highway 101 just south of the Dosewallips River bridge. The culverts are located underneath the entrance road just as the road bends towards the campground and adjacent to the park shop area. Part 6—Project Description 6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b. [help] The project is intended to correct a fish passage barrier on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and is part of the tribal lawsuit requiring the State to correct fish passage barriers in WRIA's 1-23 for anadromous fish. The project will replace two existing culverts with a bridge, relocate 1,060 feet of the Twana Creek channel and restore habitat in the new stream reach. There are ten large multiple-stemmed maple trees that have been designated as hazard trees by the State Park arborist and will be removed as part of the project. The trees are located adjacent to the existing channel along the State Park entrance road. The trees will be retained for use as habitat features in the new channel and floodplain. Additionally - 100 pieces of LWD will be added to the new channel and floodplain. The streambanks above and below the new bridge installation will be bioengineered and planted with native species. Two septic drainfields will be abandoned. The septic systems pipes and any contaminated soils will be removed. The disturbance footprint for the project is - 1.20 acres. After the project's completion - 0.56 acres will be replanted with native vegetation. 6b. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [help] The barriers (ID #997962) consist of two corrugated metal pipe culverts that are misaligned to the existing stream channel and are undersized to pass flows and sediment. During the rainy season, the bed material builds up at the upstream end of the culverts and the stream floods the adjacent shop area. Because of the misalignment of these culverts, the stream also jumps its channel and flows into the park campground area, flooding the restroom drainfield as it sheet flows across the campground. The project will replace the culverts with a pre-fabricated low-profile steel bridge, with concrete decking, and construct a new channel and floodplain for Twana Creek that will capture floodwaters and sediment loads and prevent flooding of the park campground and drainfield. The project will address fish passage, habitat, and flooding issues in Dosewallips State Park. 6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ® Environmental Enhancement 6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [help] ❑ Aquaculture ® Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland) [' Boat House ❑ Dike / Levee /Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ® Road ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific Measurement Device ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock / Pier ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Stairs ® Bridge ® Dredging ❑ Mining ❑ Bulkhead ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin ❑ Utility Line ® Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft ❑ Other: 6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. fhelpl • Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain. All work will be performed when the seasonal creek is dry. Bridge I Culvert I Road: Two existing 36" CMP pipes will be removed and replaced with a 27' wide, 30' span low-profile steel bridge with concrete road decking. The existing culverts, road prism, and existing channel will be excavated and removed to allow placement of structural fill to accommodate the bridge abutments and a new channel to be constructed underneath the bridge. The stream will be slightly realigned for the new bridge crossing. A trackhoe and dumptrucks will be used for excavating and placing materials and a crane will be used to install the bridge. If any groundwater is encountered it will be pumped out and discharged to a receiving area to be biofiltered. Streambed material and some armor rock placed underneath the bridge will be within the new 100-year floodplain of Twana Creek. Most of the excavation for the bridge placement will be outside of the new 100-year floodplain of Twana Creek (see sheet 9 of the plan set). Channel Modification I Dredging: A small bobcat excavator and dumptrucks will be used to scalp a sediment depositional area within the Twana Creek channel that extends 230 feet upstream of the new bridge. A pilot thalweg will be constructed within the reach. The dredging / sediment scalping will take place in the existing 100- year floodplain of Twana Creek. Twana Creek will be relocated and a new low-flow channel and floodplain constructed for a distance of— 1,060 feet. Trackhoes and dumptrucks will be used to excavate and remove material. Excavators will be used to remove large maple trees (roots intact). The trees will be retained on site to be used as habitat features within the new channel and floodplain. In total approximately 100-pieces of LWD will be placed within the stream and floodplain. For the most part the construction of the new channel and floodplain for Twana Creek is located outside of the existing 100-year floodplain of Twana Creek. The new channel and floodplain alignment is located in an open grassy area and will be reconnected at its lower end to the existing Twana Creek channel. The relocation of the new Twana Creek channel and floodplain requires the removal and abandonment of two septic drainfields. All pipes and any contaminated soils associated with the drainfields will be removed from the project area. 6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (Month/near) [help] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: August 15, 2014 End date: September 30, 2014 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [help] $250,000 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [help] • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes ® No [' Don't know Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [help] 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [help] ❑ Not applicable 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [Nero] [=1 Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] • If Yes, submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? [help] • If Yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. [help] 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. [help] Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact' mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. 2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 'Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter permanent"if applicable. `Creation(C),Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland. [help] 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [help] Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) [help] ® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. [help] ❑ Not applicable Turbidity and siltation impacts would be minimized by the following best management practices (BMPs): • Timing of the project would be during the seasonal dry period and within approved in-water work window (September 1 to September 30). • All construction activity would be restricted to designated construction areas. • Excavations that encounter groundwater would be dewatered and dewatering discharge would be routed to a biofiltration site within the Dosewallips State Park. • Silt fences would be installed downslope of material stockpile areas. The proposed project has been designed to limit impacts to the creek during construction. A trackhoe will begin operating from the access road and campground ingress/egress points. Construction is scheduled for the seasonal no-flow period in September. A temporary diversion into the old channel will be in place in case of the remote possibility that surface flows will occur. Large trees will be avoided wherever possible. Trees that need to be removed will be retained on site and dispersed throughout the new creek channel and floodplain areas as habitat features. Fish exclusion will not be necessary since the project will occur during the seasonal no-flow window for Twana Creek. Gravel material from excavations will be temporarily stockpiled in areas where an erosion control fence will be installed downslope of the stockpile to minimize any rain induced water quality concerns. If any water should enter the excavated area it will be pumped out and routed to an acceptable biofiltration area. Biodegradable hydraulic fluids will be used to prevent contamination in the event of a spill. Refueling and use of lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids will be conducted offsite or at a designated area away from aquatic resources. Best management practices (BMPs) will be used wherever practical. The proposed project will implement BMPs to prevent, avoid, or minimize construction impacts. The contractor will design BMPs in accordance with the requirements for temporary erosion and sedimentation control (TESC). These BMPs will be consistent with the most recent Washington State Department of Ecology stormwater manual and Jefferson County requirements. 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? [help ® Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? [help] • If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • ff No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Not applicable The project has been designed to minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. There may be a short- term water quality impact from turbidity associated with the recharge of flows to the seasonal creek during the fall rainy season (usually in November). The project is intended to be restorative and not have permanent adverse impacts on any water bodies. The project would result in increased complex in-stream and floodplain features. It removes an adult fish passage barrier and allows access to hundreds of feet of upstream habitat. The present channel runs alongside a road prism and has minimal diversity. The project also allows the stream to naturally transport sediment underneath the State Park access road from its sediment-rich upper reaches. This would prevent campground flooding, fish stranding, and would restore natural channel processes. All of these changes would be beneficial impacts. 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here. [help] Not applicable. 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. [help] Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' location2 impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody removed from directly affected waterbody Dredge/ Twana In channel Permanent. -238 CY to be 230 linear feet of Sediment Creek above new removed from channel. Scalping bridge. channel. Excavate / Twana Excavate Permanent. -4241 CY of material 1,060 linear feet Remove Trees Creek new excavated to create of new channel channel new channel and and floodplain. and floodplain. floodplain adjacent to old Twana Creek channel. Fill Twana Adjacent Permanent. -96 CY of material 1850 square feet Creek to old placed to fill the of existing channel of roadside ditch, fill a channel affected. Twana scour pool below Creek. existing culverts, place armor rock and streambed gravels underneath new bridge, and to refill a road cut. 'If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. 2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 3 Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount On cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. [pelf] Approximately 96 CY of native fill material from onsite will be used to fill an existing plunge pool at the outlet of the existing culverts and to fill an existing roadside ditch adjacent to the existing channel of Twana Creek. The material will also be used to refill and repave the road cut where two culverts will be removed (see sheet 4 of plan set). Armor rock will be placed underneath the new bridge to protect the bridge abutments. Streambed gravel will be placed underneath the new bridge. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. the pl A total of—4,479 CY of material will be excavated and removed from the project site to a certified receiving location. The material to be excavated for the new channel and floodplain consists mostly of a mixture of ancient floodplain depositional material and sediment from the existing stream channel. Trackhoes and dumptrucks will be the primary types of heavy construction equipment used to construct the new channel and floodplain. A small bobcat excavator will be used to remove —238 CY of streambed material upstream of the new bridge installation. The inability of the creek to transport sediment through the existing system of culverts has caused the stream channel to unnaturally aggrade and retain large quantities of depositional sediment material upstream of the existing culverts. Sediment scalped from this reach will reset the natural gradient and sediment transport regime of the stream. —96 CY of material will be retained from on site to be used for filling activities. Part 9—Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. [help) Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent Date of Contact WA Dept. of Fish & Theresa Powell (360) 417-1434 November 2011 Wildlife Jefferson County Donna Frostholm (360) 379-4466 August 2013 ( ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? Ihelpi • If Yes, list the parameter(s) below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d/. ❑ Yes El No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? Ihelp) • Go to http://cfpub.epa.gov/surfllocate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. Hood Canal Watershed -- 17110018 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA#) is the project in? Ihelpl • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. 16 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? Ihelpl • Go to http:/lwww.ecy.wa.qov/programslwq/swgs/criteria.html for the standards. El Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? [help] • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: http://www.ecv.wa.ciov/programs/sea/sma/laws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑Aquatic ❑ Conservancy ❑ Other 9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? [hem • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertypi�:aw for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. ❑ Shoreline ® Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? [help] • If No,provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. ® Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment? [ • If Yes, please describe below. ❑ Yes ® No 9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below. [help] Before becoming a State Park, the park estuary area was ditched and drained and used for agriculture. Levees were constructed along the lower Dosewallips River to confine the mainstem to a single channel. There was also historical logging of the land. 9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? [help] • If Yes,attach it to your JARPA package. ® Yes ❑ No 91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. [ Chinook salmon, bull trout, Hood Canal summer-run chum salmon, steelhead, southern resident killer whale, humpback whale, and stellar sea lion. 9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help] Species: bull trout/dolly varden, Chinook salmon, summer-sun chum salmon, coastal resident / searun cutthroat trout, coho salmon, resident rainbow trout, steelhead trout, and pink salmon. Habitat: Riparian, and instream. Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/. • Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or help(a.ora.wa.gov. • For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (Check all that apply.) [help] • For more information about SEPA, go to www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html. ®A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. ❑ A SEPA determination is pending with (lead agency). The expected decision date is ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in lob.) [help] ❑ This project is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (Check all that apply.) [heiul LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance ❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): I Other City/County permits: ® Floodplain Development Permit ® Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: � Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption —Attach Exemption Form Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for $150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash. Check the appropriate boxes: 111$150 check enclosed. Check# Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. ®Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. Agreement# 12-1417 ❑My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption) ❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff. Agreement# ❑ Mineral prospecting and mining. ❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land. (Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor, or other proof of current land use.) ❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012. HPA# Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Use Authorization Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources. Do not send cash. Washington Department of Ecology: ® Section 401 Water Quality Certification FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ® Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) n Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) Part 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, etc. [help] 11a. Applicant Signature (required) [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. 0 e (initial) By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work reated to the project. \.29 (initial) Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature Date 11b. Authorized Agent Signature [help] I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. 4r ny S-ho h kuS a S� .F/,""''a' /o/4'//3 Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized gent Signature Dare 11c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [nelvl Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements. i consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick, scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance(ORIA)at(800) 917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877) 833-6341. ORIA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev.08/2013 JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 16 of 16 - ‘.7r-0•CrIVr 77- i ■ 1 r M IJI -C) I M v(7) 17'0 Ill 7 ill I '- -I 13 irr''71 r I C H-3 \ ' r-1 2 I E 1 I 1 (,<„, ,...,yn - rn 1'y? cn 1 R I rrl 0 r I * ° rni 71 r- m K 0 > n A .) al r' T1 ,.... fll rn 0 (1 , J . 2 -i2S' fili ---.....' --.- 11.- 111- '4r-'"---r'-'--------- ----\\\-------- _...... , ;:ilujj' \\:\ li -1 m ---, rn --- I 71 M "Iv-^. p-DO Z .2--P-eh , , GO 07 07 (0 X _y 77 X I Fn- 0 i-7f rTi > \ \ \ --1 (f) 0 m m m I,. -- r 77 > M 0 07 17 M 0 - 0X) I . _ - H' " fro ...- tct z m > m RI r- Z -I r- A '- /4.,0401 , DI. P''‘. w/..74"7‘,bt, ........... Z m r- m 41 2.r P12 It t:_4 ?..,, /.../7/ ..„,.._:_--4,--74 ei., '-''. sk'). , I ■ m t3 0 / T- L.)X -‘...1. ',..,:* ,,z ---- H -, —_ 01 0 ' 7 _ c r /7, / / '7 / I M c -11 0 Wr. I 1. .7 \ < 0 r- -I 0 \ 5 n 0 4/ ( .). \II >7 111 N rn m ‘`---. \\ / / '? Tw_.%... 30 r° 0 1 / 7-' 11 / / /4' N'4117) . 77‘. 7 0 11 m / /0 y'' i - In _1 -1 73 rd C 7 M X ru 5 /a (q• 71(.. r.-5 7 07 2 > 1 -11L t In z n -U Uj '6 " U 1 t. m ..: ____________ • y -- ' - AI, \ f.• \\,. -----.- '-'. ■ (:,, 0 ,$ • i ---- / __- .1 c,C,-) _z___,„-----_____,---- ..__.__:_r_1_,-- ) / $ c/ , , 1 ,I 13/i'• IA ./..„,-, 4, -) t 0 1:1 \ C .--- -0 M CO / II / A'y/ 0 x 7/ I. H• (37 17 .r-.2.: ' (I) .---‘- / D c H m A r oxl t /- • _ \ •P• a„ /-?lb :9/$ CIO 1 /) a 0 n---.. i) P rrr ')4ro 0 // /441 / r / 1 D / at Al - , .‘ ,......„---- / -, , / / / , t i --- / 47 / 1 0 / $ k' 1,,,/ .,e _,,-.-- "- l'. \ /\/<1 ''''' N. 7 ..,, \ --, 1 ,,,„ / il T _ r c s''\'■\ 1 rn ./ / - / -- •----3--,...,,7,, \‘" ) S (x 37 / / / / / 1 r (3. __--------- X 2> m—I IA / m (/)aa / i it 171 --' ( // / - m 0 0> ■0 .------ ti rn rn 1 __----- , / '*'(' >fn r-X IN -2- ------ ?6-I <A 0 --7 _ - ---- - (I) / -- \. )‘•''' 7"."c.--- \SI' ----- .--` / y V Z n rn , _ M / M Z -- ---- T F3 r ---- -- -- - ..3.- 01 - --- , r...) / _ -- ..-- 2 - _ ' CD -ri y - , --i- / CZ.7 li[II -37 ■■■■•• nX3 -/-1 :s- ,. 7:. „ „„, n > --t - - ' ',7, i,. --, . /./.. .....7 rrl Z o> — ..'..' - 0 r•-' 0 in .7°M M 73 z , ,--, • M ei ,'' <3 \ ..jg ” CD ' r Z X -0 ci 3 --. > > g...: —,, CZ0 (I) 0 0)--- xi ---, 0 m ....., .,, 0 c:, _ „,--• 0") _ A —'I —I -0 W J J4Ltst trj 1 -I ;=-121 > 4* 7° r- m -K3 > .— -- --.„ ■-', , 0 5 2 q --1 , .0 m > r-- - - %.0 7S r- _, .-) 41 it_ Irffl , Z 0 0 z V 01 Z 0 If) -1:3 Cfl (7, ff) LP---------j\J 1"../ i Ir. NO PI.1`,1..IN It'r 1 Al ,,,II 3yDon Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Road SW • P.O. Box 42650• Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 Washington Telecommunication Relay Service at (800) 833-6388 www.parks.wa.gov FINAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Name of Proposal:DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK FISH BARRIER REMOVAL AND TWANA CREEK RESTORATION Description of Proposal: The project is to correct the fish passage barrier on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and to restore stream habitat. The barrier(ID#997962)consists of double corrugated steel culverts that are misaligned to the stream channel and are undersized.The project will replace the culverts with a 27 ft wide by 30-foot span steel bridge, and construct an approximately 50-foot wide floodplain and 1270-foot long naturalized channel(270-feet upstream and 1000- feet downstream of the existing culvert outlet). Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Location of Proposal,including street address,if any: Dosewallips State Park is a 425-acre park located on the Olympic Peninsula at the easterly base of the Olympic Mountains. The park is located on the shores of Hood Canal and the Dosewallips River in Jefferson County. Site address is 306996 Highway 101 Brinnon, WA 98320. Lead Agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Responsible Official Randy Kline Position/Title Environmental Program Manager hj-/ Phone: (360) 902-8632/FAX (360) 586-6647 �L randy.kline(aparks.wa.gov l JA , Address Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission j .__ --1_J 1111 Israel Road SW JEFFERSON COUNTY Olympia, WA 98504-2650 DE°T OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — Date October 7,2013 Signature "All Washington State Parks are developed and maintained for the enjoyment of all persons regardless of age,sex,creed, ethnic origin,or physical limitations." ���4SON % JEFFERSON COUNTY ( 1 I M 1 1_,l 1.‘ ,,;7 �., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 J �,. 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 I JAN 3 0 2014 IS' O 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax j - - I —J LNG http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ I JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Stormwater Calculation Worksheet pd;sa,.,'o/!,pr Sra I. /\,.} rc'/anq GI-erk Frsh earner PEWLva) a' MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Izy 0-4-6 ra 4-,c p"-ouF r.71 ,)v<2,5h n_" 1•r. ,S 1-<:./--e-- fJt•r � co r,d 42iJ,, . rte.'//c0 DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stormwater calculaiion worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small," "medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan, if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE Size of parcel /03.,/9 acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 4,494,95-6 sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation, and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species, other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow,elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower, and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: -75 d Does the project convert 3/4 acres or more of Construction site for structures r > sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield, septic tank, etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes N Well, utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 21/2 acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway, parking,roads, etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes No Lawn, landscaping, etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance sq/ft Cut 12 4 I Fill 5 G7 (cu/yd) [over] 5Z,i7z P� 51 PG )s M' stormwater talc worksheet Rev 9-9-2010—REV 9/912010 t Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS -IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/fl Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway, parking, roads, etc sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads, etc 6c L sq/ft Other �r,d y e O sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New -75-0 sq/ft Total Existing rBOC sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING" /350 sq/ft "This amount will be used BY STAFF to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentageQ O-c"o I % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes (No' FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. L r (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM LARGE REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No slorrnwater talc worksheet Rev 9-9-2010—REV 9/9/2010 f HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN : Dosewallips State Park Twana Creek Fish Barrier #997962 Removal and Restoration Project i !i Prepared by: Amy Stonkus, P.E. � Ecologist JAN 3 Q ?',''.4 Wild Fish Conservancy y Ij i JEFFERSON COUNTY INTRODUCTION PEFT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that originates on the western flanks of the foothills adjacent to the eastern side of Dosewallips State Park located in Brinnon, WA. The steep headwater areas give way to transitional gradients that eventually intersect the ancient floodplains of the Dosewallips River valley. It is here where the stream passes underneath the existing access road through two 36"-diameter culverts where there is a fish passage barrier problem. The culverts are undersized and commonly surcharge during large storm events. The result is a build up of sediments, ranging in size to up to 8" cobbles, that can't naturally be transported to the floodplain. The problems here are twofold: 1. The existing road and culvert system bisect what would normally be the upper footprint for a natural alluvial fan and disrupts the natural transport of sediment to this fan area; 2. The build up of sediment within the culverts blocks fish access to upstream reaches of Twana Creek. Downstream beyond the culvert crossing, Twana Creek follows an abnormally straight alignment in a channel that was historically constructed to keep the creek from encroaching into campground areas of Dosewallips State Park. The unnatural alignment limits habitat complexity for salmonids and lacks any functional floodplain. The project as proposed is of a restorative nature as opposed to a developmental one. The primary objectives are to remove the fish passage barrier by replacing the culverts with a 30' spanning bridge and to realign Twana Creek with a new floodplain and channel. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EFFECTS The project is intended to correct a fish passage barrier (identified as #997962) on Twana Creek in the Dosewallips State Park. The project is part of the tribal lawsuit requiring the State to correct fish passage barriers in WRIA's 1-23 for anadromous fish. • The project will replace two existing 70'-long, 36"-diameter culverts with a 30' span by 27'-wide low—profile steel bridge. The bridge decking will be made of concrete panels and will include a 5'-wide pedestrian walkway. The choice of a bridge will allow the sediment-rich stream to transport material to where it can be naturally dispersed to the floodplain. The bridge clearance has been designed to easily pass a 100-year storm event. A bridge will also allow unhindered fish passage upstream and downstream to adult and juvenile salmonids. The streambanks above and below the new bridge installation will be bioengineered to restore and replant native vegetation. The channel will be scalped 230' upstream of the new bridge to remove the sediment that has deposited as a result of the undersized culverts. A pilot thaiweg will be constructed in the channel within the upstream reach. Approximately 1,060 feet of new channel and floodplain will be constructed to realign and restore natural habitat functions to Twana Creek. There are ten large multiple-stemmed maple trees that have been designated as hazard trees by the State Park arborist and will be removed as part of the project. These trees are located adjacent to the existing channel along the State Park entrance road. The trees will be retained for use as habitat features in the new channel and floodplain. Additionally — 100 pieces of LWD will be added to the new channel and floodplain. There are also 16 identified large maple trees that will remain unaffected along the new riparian corridor. Two septic drainfields will be abandoned. The septic systems pipes and any contaminated soils will be removed. The disturbance footprint for the project is - 1.20 acres. After the project's completion — 0.56 acres will be replanted with native vegetation. HABITAT PLAN Removing a fish passage barrier and providing a much-improved natural functioning channel and floodplain with superior habitat features compared to the existing conditions now in place will mitigate the short-term and adverse impacts to the stream. The removal of the fish passage barrier will open up several hundred feet of spawning and rearing habitat currently not accessible to anadromous fish. There are no expected long-term adverse impacts from the project. Construction will occur when there are no flows in Twana Creek, limiting risks and exposure during undesirable stormwater events. The creek does not begin to flow again well into late October— early November, providing an extensive fish window in which to work within. The new channel and floodplain will have an extensive riparian buffer revegetated with native species. This will create a larger non-disturbance zone for spawning salmon. Retaining as many trees as possible within the construction footprint will minimize impacts to large maple trees along the existing alignment and provide immediate high-canopy shading benefits. x Monitoring of the effectiveness of the fish passage removal or other aspects of the project will follow requirements as set forth by the Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit. The collection of the required data will be shared with Jefferson County in a timely fashion. ! aZaI1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION December 22,2012 KA Project No. 102-12020 Draft GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION TWANA CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT DOSIWALLIPS STATE PARK 306996 U.S.HIGHWAY 101,BRINNON,WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation for the proposed culvert replacement project in the Dosiwallips State Park,Brinnon, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. Discussions regarding site conditions are presented herein, together with conclusions and recommendations pertaining to site preparation, excavations, structural fill, utility trench backfill, drainage and landscaping,erosion control,foundations,and pavement design. Twana Creek is currently conveyed beneath the Dosiwallips State Park access road via a culvert consisting of two 18-inch pipes. We understand that the existing culvert will be removed and replaced with a new bridge across the roadway, which is proposed to occupy roughly the same area as the culvert. A site plan showing the approximate exploratory soil boring locations is presented following the text of this report (Figure 2). A description of the field investigation, laboratory testing, and the exploratory soil boring logs are presented in Appendix A. Appendices B and C contain guides to aid in the development of earthwork and pavement specifications. When conflicts in the text of the report occur with the general specifications in the appendices, the recommendations in the text of the report have precedence. Selected photographs of the drilling operation are presented in Appendix D. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This investigation was conducted to evaluate the shallow soil and groundwater conditions at the site, to develop geotechnical engineering recommendations for use in design of specific construction elements and to provide criteria for site preparation and earthwork construction. Our scope of services was performed in general accordance with our proposal for this project, dated October 16,2012(Proposal Number G12-176WAK)and included the following: Offices Serving The Western United States 1230 Finn Rill Road,•Poulsbo,Washington 98370•(360)598-2126•Fax:(360)698-2127 KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 2 Draft • A site reconnaissance by a member of our geotechnical staff to evaluate the surface conditions at the project site. • Geotechnical boring layout plan, comprehensive boring logs including soil stratification and classification,and groundwater levels where applicable; • Allowable foundation bearing pressure, anticipated settlements (both total and differential), coefficient of horizontal friction for footing design, and frost penetration depth; • Parameters for angle of internal friction,equivalent fluid pressures (active and passive)for rigid (at rest)and total unit weight; • Recommendations for seismic design considerations including site coefficient and ground acceleration; • Recommendations for the use, placement, and compaction of on-site soils and imported fill materials in the building and pavement areas; • Construction and excavation considerations, topsoil/unsuitable soil stripping depth, identification of any problematic soils or groundwater conditions, depth of over-excavation if required; • Design criteria for temporary excavations; • Discussion of relevant pavement design parameters and recommended pavement design; • Compaction requirements for subgrade and various pavement layers; • Recommendations for site drainage and erosion control. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Current conceptual plans indicate that the existing culvert will be removed and replaced with a new bridge, which may occupy roughly the same footprint as the current culvert. We anticipate that the foundation loads will be moderate and that the bridge abutments will be founded below existing grades. Overall, we anticipate minimal grading of areas surrounding the abutments, based on the elevations of the site and adjacent areas. We should be given an opportunity to update this report through an addendum letter once the abutment locations and designs are finalized in order to verify the appropriateness of the geotechnical recommendations. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located on the Dosiwallips State Park access road in Brinson, Washington. The bridge will cross the roadway,roughly perpendicular to the existing roadway,with a northwest to southeast angle to accommoda e the creek bed alignment. The general location of the site is shown on Figure 1 (Vicinity Map). The site is surrounded by the Dosiwallips State Park, with a wooded area directly to the west, and a landscaped campsite area to the east. The ranger station driveway is slightly northwest of the site. The ground surface of the site is only slightly elevated around the creek and roadway. Twana Creek flows southeast through the existing culvert through a wooded area and eventually empties into Dabob Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 3 Draft Bay inlet of the Puget Sound. The property surrounding the site is currently occupied by Dosiwallips State Park, which is a Washington State Park. The subject paved road provides access to campsites and other park features. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No.4 Draft GEOLOGIC SETTING The site lies within the central Puget Lowland. North of Olympia, Washington,this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances/retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial sediments consisting of interbedded sand, gravel and silt. The Geologic Map of Washington — Northwest Ouadrant prepared by Joe D. Dragovich, et al (Washington Department of Natural Resources - Division of Geology and Earth Resources, 2002) indicates that the vicinity of the proposed bridge alignment is underlain by Quaternary glacial outwash (undifferentiated) (Qgo), Quaternary (glacial) advance sands (Qga), and Quaternary modified land (Qgm). These materials are deposited by advancing glaciers, and subsequently compacted by the overlying pressure of the glacier. The materials are varied, but generally consists of very compact, unsorted clay, silt, sand,gravel,cobbles and some boulders. Our explorations generally encountered native soils consisting of dense to very dense silty sand with gravel, which is generally consistent with a description for glacial till. These were underlain by stiff to very stiff clay, suggesting a lower energy depositional environment such as lacustrine or distal settlement environs. FIELD INVESTIGATION A total of two (2) geotechnical borings were completed to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the proposed construction areas. The borings were completed on November 19,2012 with a truck-mounted drill rig from Environmental Drilling, Inc. The depth of the soil borings were approximately 24.5 feet below the existing ground surface(bgs). A licensed geologist from Krazan was present during the explorations, examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, obtained samples of the different soil types, and maintained logs of the explorations. It is noted that a three day period of record rainfall was recorded on the date of the drilling, suggesting some unusual groundwater conditions may have been encountered, and that moisture content of permeable soils may have been unusually elevated. Representative samples of the subsurface soils encountered in the geotechnical explorations were collected and sealed in plastic bags. These samples were transported to our laboratory for further examination and verification of the field classifications. The soils encountered in the exploratory borings were continuously examined and visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A more detailed description of the field investigation is presented in Appendix A. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No.5 Draft SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soils encountered in the borings were generally consistent with the mapped geologic units, primarily consisting of glacial deposits. Some areas of undocumented fill and roadway base course were encountered overlying the native soils on both sides of the roadway. The following paragraphs present a brief description of the soil conditions encountered in each of the borings. For more detailed information the boring logs should be reviewed. Exploratory boring TC-1 was located on the east side of the roadway,just north of the existing culvert pipes. In the near surface, TC-1 encountered approximately 1.5 feet of roadway base course that extended to the shoulder of the road. Below these materials,the soil boring encountered approximately three and one half feet of topsoil and undocumented fill. The fill was underlain by loose silt with san and gravel to a dept of approximately 11 feet bgs. Below the silt, from approximately 11 feet bgs to approximately 16 feet bgs, the boring encountered dense silty sand with gravel (USCS SM) (till). The till sharply contacted gray, well-graded unsorted stiff to very stiff clay to the total depth explored at approximately 24.0 feet below current grade. We interpreted these materials to be native lacustrine or distal glacial outwash deposits. Exploratory soil boring TC-2 was located on the west side of the roadway, south of the footbridge and just north of the existing culvert. Soils were very similar to those encountered in boring TC-1. In the near surface, TC-2 encountered approximately 1.0 feet of roadway base course that extended to the shoulder of the road. Below these materials, the soil boring encountered approximately three feet of topsoil and undocumented fill. The fill was underlain by loose and saturated silty sand with gravel,with a relatively high gravel content. These materials were underlain by approximately 4.5 feet of dense to very dense silty sand with gravel (USCS SM) (till) to approximately 12 feet bgs. The till sharply contacted gray, well-graded unsorted stiff to very stiff clay to the total depth explored at approximately 24.5 feet below current grade. We interpreted these materials to be native lacustrine or distal glacial outwash deposits. For additional information about the soils encountered, please refer to the logs of the exploratory soil borings in Appendix A. GROUNDWATER The exploratory soil borings were checked for the presence of groundwater during drilling operations. Perched groundwater was encountered in boring TC-1 at a depth of approximately 3.0 feet bgs, and again at approximately 13 feet bgs. Groundwater was also encountered in boring TC-2 at a depth of about 4 feet below the existing ground surface and at approximately 13 feet bgs. The deeper groundwater encountered in these borings appeared to be consistent with the high volume of groundwater near the creek bed, and was likely elevated due to creek flooding and subsurface volume increase due to extreme rainfall. It is noted that the groundwater encountered in the borings appeared to Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 6 Draft be associated with the contact between the weathered till zone and the relatively impermeable underlying clays. It should be recognized that water table elevations may fluctuate with time. The groundwater level will be dependent upon seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use, and climatic conditions, as well as other factors. Therefore, water levels at the time of the field investigation may be different from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. The evaluation of such factors is beyond the scope of this report. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Erosion Concern/Hazard The Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) maps for King County indicate that the site is underlain by Hoodsport —Grove very gravelly sandy barns (0 to 30 percent slopes). This soil type in relatively flat terrain has a slight potential for erosion in a disturbed state. It has been our experience that soil erosion potential can be minimized through landscaping and surface water runoff control. Typically erosion of exposed soils will be most noticeable during periods of rainfall and may be controlled by the use of normal temporary erosion control measures, i.e.,silt fences, hay bales, mulching, control ditches or diversion trenching, and contour furrowing. Erosion control measures should be in place before the onset of wet weather. Seismic HazardThe geotechnical borings indicate that the site is underlain by dense to very dense glacial soils. In our opinion, the overall soil profile corresponds to a soil profile Site Class D as defined by Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code. Site Class D applies to a soil profile consisting of medium dense to very dense soils within the upper 100 feet. We referred to the U.S. Geological Survey(USGS)Earthquake Hazards Program Website and 2009 IBC to obtain values for Ss, Si, FA, and F . The USGS website includes the most updated published data on seismic conditions. The site specific seismic design parameters are as follows: PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration,in percent of g) 31.39 (10%Probability of Exceedence in 50 years) 55.68 (2%Probability of Exceedence in 50 years) Ss 123.70% of g Si 42.20%of g Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No.7 Draft FA 1.005 Fy 1.578 Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high groundwater table. The dense glacial till soils interpreted to underlie the site are considered to have a low potential for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the site is compatible with the planned development. Our explorations indicated that the site is underlain by approximately four feet of undocumented fill. Below the topsoil, pavement base course, and undocumented fill, the borings encountered competent native,weathered glacial till and stiff to very stiff silty soils. We recommend that the surficial organics, undocumented fill and loose soils be stripped to expose the underlying medium dense/stiff or firmer native soils. The native soil should provide adequate support for bridge foundation and pavement. We recommend that the shallow spread footings may be designed to support the proposed bridge. Footings should extend through any organic soil, loose soil, or undocumented fill and be founded on the underlying dense/stiff native soil or on structural fill extending to the competent native soils. Based on our explorations,the dense/stiff native soil should typically be encountered approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) feet below the ground surface near the existing culvert. Deeper areas of loose soils could be encountered in the unexplored areas of the site. The soils encountered on this site are considered moisture-sensitive and will deteriorate easily when wet. We recommend that construction take place during the drier summer months, if possible. If construction is to take place during wet weather, additional expenses and delays should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the need for placing a blanket of rock spalls to protect exposed subgrades and construction traffic areas. The non-organic on-site soils could be used as structural fill provided the moisture content is near optimum and they could be suitably compacted to specifications. This will depend on the moisture content of the soils at the time of construction. Krazan and Associates should be retained to determine if the on-site soils can be used as structural fill material at the time of construction. Site Preparation Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 8 Draft General site clearing should include removal of vegetation; trees and associated root systems; wood; existing utilities; structures;rubble; and rubbish. Any remaining loose areas that may affect construction traffic should be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill. Generally, one to two feet of angular rock (2 to 4 inch spalls) is suitable to bridge underlying loose or soft soils if placed on a geotextile fabric. If earthwork is performed during the drier months of the year, additional work and over-excavation may not be necessary. Site and condition specific recommendations should be provided by the geotechnical engineer during construction. During wet weather conditions,typically October through May, subgrade stability problems and grading difficulties may develop due to excess moisture, disturbance of sensitive soils and/or the presence of perched groundwater. Construction during the extended wet weather periods could create the need to remove wet disturbed soils if they cannot be suitably compacted due to elevated moisture contents. The onsite soils have significant silt content and are considered moisture sensitive and can be easily disturbed. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be confirmed through continuous monitoring and testing by a qualified geotechnical engineer or geologist. Soils that have become unstable may require drying to near their optimal moisture content before compaction is feasible. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material during extended periods of dry, warm weather(typically during the summer months). If the soils cannot be dried back to a workable moisture condition, remedial measures may be required. General project site winterization should consist of the placement of aggregate base and the protection of exposed soils during the construction phase. It should be understood that even if Best Management Practices (BMP's) for wintertime soil protection are implemented and followed there is a significant chance that moisture disturbed soil mitigation work will still be required. Any buried structures encountered during construction should be properly removed and backfilled. Excavations, depressions, or soft and pliant areas extending below the planned finish subgrade levels should be excavated to expose firm undisturbed soil, and backfilled with structural fill. In general, any septic tanks, underground storage tanks, debris pits, cesspools, or similar structures should be completely removed. Concrete footings should be removed to an equivalent depth of at least 3 feet below proposed footing elevations or as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. The resulting excavations should be backfilled with structural fill. A representative of our firm should be present during all site clearing and grading operations to observe, test and evaluate earthwork construction. This testing and observation is an integral part of our service, as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction and stability of the material. The geotechnical engineer may reject any material that does not meet compaction and stability requirements. Further recommendations, contained in this report, are predicated upon the assumption Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 9 Draft that earthwork construction will conform to the recommendations set forth in this section and in the Structural Fill Section. Structural Fill Fill placed beneath foundations, pavement, or other settlement-sensitive structures should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in-place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. The area to receive the fill should be suitably prepared as described in the Site Preparation subsection of this report prior to beginning fill placement. Best Management Practices(BMP's)should be followed when considering the suitability of the existing materials for use as structural fill. The native soils are generally considered suitable for reuse as structural fill, provided the soil is relatively free of organic material and debris, and it is within ± 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. If the native soils are stockpiled for later use as structural fill, the stockpiles should be covered to protect the soil from wet weather conditions. We recommend that a representative of Krazan & Associates be on site during the excavation work to determine which soils are suitable for structural fill. It should not be taken for granted that the on-site soils may be used as the sole source for structural fill (especially during winter construction activities). During wet weather conditions, the soils with higher silt contents will be moisture sensitive,easily disturbed, and may be difficult or impossible to compact to structural fill requirements. Furthermore, during the winter, soils typically have elevated natural moisture contents, which will limit the use of these materials as structural fill without proper mitigation measures. The contractor should use Best Management Practices to protect the soils during construction activities and be familiar with wet weather and wintertime soil work. An allowance for importing structural fill should be incorporated into the construction cost of the project (for wintertime construction this may be as high as 100 percent import). Imported structural fill material should consist of well-graded gravel or a sand and gravel mixture with a maximum grain size of 3 inches and less than 5 percent fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve). All structural fill material should be submitted for approval to the geotechnical engineer at least 48 hours prior to delivery to the site. Fill soils should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness prior to compaction, moisture-conditioned as necessary, (moisture content of soil shall not vary by more than ±2 percent of optimum moisture) and the material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 10 Draft density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. In place density tests should be performed on all structural fill to document proper moisture content and adequate compaction. Additional lifts should not be placed if the previous lift did not meet the compaction requirements or if soil conditions are not considered stable. Temporary Excavations Based on our understanding of the project,we anticipate that the grading will be limited with cuts on the order of approximately 10 feet or less. All temporary cuts that will extend deeper than 4 feet, the temporary excavations should be sloped no steeper than IH:1V (Horizontal: Vertical)in the dense/stiff on-site soils. All temporary cuts should be in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Part N, Excavation, Trenching, and Shoring. The temporary slope cuts should be visually inspected daily by a qualified person during construction work activities and the results of the inspections should be included in daily reports. The contractor is responsible for maintaining the stability of the temporary cut slopes and minimizing slope erosion during construction. The temporary cut slopes should be covered with plastic sheeting to help minimize erosion during wet weather and the slopes should be closely monitored until the permanent retaining systems are complete. Materials should not be stored and equipment operated within 10 feet of the top of any temporary cut slope. A Krazan & Associates geologist or geotechnical engineer should observe, at least periodically, the temporary cut slopes during the excavation work. The reasoning for this is that all soil conditions may not be fully delineated during the previous geotechnical exploratory work. In the case of temporary slope cuts, the existing soil conditions may not be fully revealed until the excavation work exposes the soil. Typically, as excavation work progresses the maximum inclination of the temporary slope will need to be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Soil and groundwater conditions can be highly variable. Scheduling for soil work will need to be adjustable, to deal with unanticipated conditions, so that the project can proceed smoothly and required deadlines can be met. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, Krazan&Associates should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be taken and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. As a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 11 Draft I) Phase the soil, foundation,utility and other work, requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the wet season(generally October through April),but it should also be known that this may increase the overall cost of the project. 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. 4) Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited, other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. Foundations The proposed bridge may be supported on a shallow foundation system bearing on the medium dense/ stiff or firmer native soils, or on structural fill extending to the medium dense/ stiff or firmer native soils. Based on our explorations, the medium dense/ stiff or firmer native soil should typically be encountered approximately ten(10)to twelve (12)feet below the existing ground surface in the vicinity of existing culvert. Deeper areas of loose soils could be encountered in the unexplored areas of the site. Conventional shallow spread foundations should be placed on the undisturbed medium dense/ stiff or firmer native soils or be supported on structural fill including rock spalls or Control Density Fill (CDF) extending to those soils. Where loose soils or undocumented fill are encountered at the planned footing elevations,the subgrade should be over-excavated to expose suitable bearing soil. To reduce the volume of extra excavation needed for the footing trenches and to simplify structural fill placement, it may be practical to place Control Density Fill (CDF)to fill the deeper footing trenches to the planned footing subgrade elevations. CDF is a lean concrete mix with compressive strengths on the order of 100 to 250 pounds per square inch (psi). If CDF is used, the trench may be excavated only slightly wider (6 inches wider on each side) than the footing. 1f rock spalls or structural fill are used, the trenches would need to be widened on both sides of the footing a distance equal to one-half of the depth of the over-excavation below the bottom of the footing. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 12 Draft Footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below the finished adjacent grade. Footing widths should be based on the anticipated loads and allowable soil bearing pressure. Water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. Footings should have a minimum width of 12 inches regardless of load. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. For foundations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psi) be used for the footing design for footings founded on the medium dense/ stiff or better native soils or structural fill extending to the native competent material. A representative of Krazan and Associates should evaluate the foundation bearing soil. We should be consulted if higher bearing pressures are needed. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration wind and seismic loads. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Footing excavations should be inspected to verify that the foundations will bear on suitable material. For foundations constructed as recommended, the total settlement is not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlement should be less than '/z inch. Most settlement is expected to occur during construction, as the loads are applied. However, additional post-construction settlement may occur if the foundation soils are flooded or saturated. It should be noted that the risk of liquefaction is considered low, given the composition and density/consistency of the native,on site soils. Resistance to lateral footing displacement can be computed using an allowable friction factor of 0.30 acting between the bases of foundations and the supporting subgrade. Lateral resistance for footings can alternatively be developed using an allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure of 225 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting against the appropriate vertical footing faces (neglecting the upper 12 inches). The allowable friction factor and allowable equivalent fluid passive pressure values include a factor of safety of 1.5. The frictional and passive resistance of the soil may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. A 1/3 increase in the above values may be used for short duration, wind and seismic loads. Testing and Inspection A representative of Krazan & Associates, Inc. should be present at the site during the earthwork activities to confirm that actual subsurface conditions are consistent with the exploratory fieldwork. This activity is an integral part of our services as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon compaction testing and stability of the material. This representative can also verify that the intent of these recommendations is incorporated into the project design and construction. Krazan & Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 13 Draft Associates,Inc. will not be responsible for grades or staking, since this is the responsibility of the Prime Contractor. Furthermore, Krazan & Associates is not responsible for the contractor's procedures, methods, scheduling or management of the work site. LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement,new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. hi light of this, the owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. Our report, design conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly,from those indicated in this report. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. The findings and conclusions of this report can be affected by the passage of time, such as seasonal weather conditions, manmade influences, such as construction on or adjacent to the site, natural events such as earthquakes, slope instability, flooding, or groundwater fluctuations. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report may not be valid. The geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations can be reviewed and reevaluated. Misinterpretations of this report by other design team members can result in project delays and cost overruns. These risks can be reduced by having Krazan & Associates, Inc. involved with the design teams meetings and discussions after submitting the report. Krazan & Associates, Inc. should also be retained for reviewing pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 14 Draft also misinterpret this report. To reduce this,risk Krazan&Associates. Inc. should participate in pre-bid and preconstruction meetings,and provide construction observations during the site work. This report is a geotechnical engineering investigation with the purpose of evaluating the soil conditions in terms of foundation design. The scope of our services did not include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or atmosphere, or the presence of wetlands. Any statements or absence of statements, in this report or on any test pit log regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed are strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous and/or toxic assessments. The geotechnical information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geotechnical developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for any other site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. o-O-o Krazan&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 102-12020 December 22,2012 Page No. 15 Draft If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at(425)485-5514. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. Michael D.Rundquist,P.E. Senior Project Manager RN VC:MR: Krazau&Associates,Inc. Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States Iazari & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING 4 FIELD INVESTIGATION 4 SOIL PROFILE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5 GROUNDWATER g Erosion Concern/Hazard 6 Seismic Hazard 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..... 7 Site Preparation 7 Structural Fill 9 Temporary Excavations 10 Erosion and Sediment Control 10 Shallow Foundations 11 Testing and Inspection 12 LIMITATIONS 13 VICINITY MAP Figure 1 SITE PLAN Figure 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION&LABORATORY TESTING Appendix A EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS Appendix B PAVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS Appendix C Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 11715 N. Creek Parkway S., C-106•Bothell,Washington 98011•(425)485-5519•Fax:(425)485-6837 Appendix A Page A.1 APPENDIX A FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Field Investigation The field investigation consisted of a surface reconnaissance and a subsurface exploration program. Two(2) exploratory borings were drilled and sampled for subsurface exploration at this site. The depth of the soil borings were approximately 24.5 feet bgs. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The depths shown on the attached boring logs are from the existing ground surface at the time the borings were drilled. The soils encountered were logged in the field during the exploration and, with supplementary laboratory test data, are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS). The drilled borings were advanced using a trailer mounted drilling rig. Disturbed soil samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) as described in ASTM D 1586. The Standard Penetration Test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch outside-diameter, split barrel sampler into the subsoil with a 140-pound hammer free falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer-blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the Standard Penetration Resistance, or N-value. The blow count is presented graphically on the boring logs in this appendix. The resistance,or"N"value,provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or of the relative consistency of cohesive soils. All samples were returned to our laboratory for evaluation. The logs of the exploratory borings along with the laboratory test results are presented in this appendix. Laboratory Testing The laboratory testing program was developed primarily to determine the index properties of the soils. Test results were used for soil classification and as criteria for determining the engineering suitability of the surface and subsurface materials encountered. The results of the sieve analysis and atterberg limits are presented in this appendix. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Appendix B Page B.1 APPENDIX B EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL When the text of the report conflicts with the general specifications in this appendix, the recommendations in the report have precedence. SCOPE OF WORK: These specifications and applicable plans pertain to and include all earthwork associated with the site rough grading,including but not limited to the furnishing of all labor, tools, and equipment necessary for site clearing and grubbing, stripping, preparation of foundation materials for receiving fill, excavation, processing, placement and compaction of fill and backfill materials to the lines and grades shown on the project grading plans,and disposal of excess materials. PERFORMANCE: The Contractor shall be responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthwork in accordance with the project plans and specifications. This work shall be inspected and tested by a representative of Krazan and Associates, Inc., hereinafter known as the Geotechnical Engineer and/or Testing Agency. Attainment of design grades when achieved shall be certified to by the project Civil Engineer. Both the Geotechnical Engineer and Civil Engineer are the Owner's representatives. If the contractor should fail to meet the technical or design requirements embodied in this document and on the applicable plans, he shall make the necessary readjustments until all work is deemed satisfactory as determined by both the Geotechnical Engineer and Civil Engineer. No deviation from these specifications shall be made except upon written approval of the Geotechnical Engineer, Civil Engineer or project Architect. No earthwork shall be performed without the physical presence or approval of the Geotechnical Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Geotechnical Engineer at least 2 working days prior to the commencement of any aspect of the site earthwork. The Contractor agrees that he shall assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of this project, including safety of all persons and property; that this requirement shall apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours; and that the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Owner and the Engineers harmless from any and all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, except for liability arising from the sole negligence of the Owner of the Engineers. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: All compacted materials shall be densified to a density not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557 as specified in the technical portion of the Geotechnical Engineering Report. The results of these tests and compliance with these specifications shall be the basis upon which satisfactory completion of work will be judged by the Geotechnical Engineer. SOIL AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS: The Contractor is presumed to have visited the site and to have familiarized himself with existing site conditions and the contents of the data presented in the soil report. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Appendix B Page B.1 The Contractor shall make his own interpretation of the data contained in said report,and the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability under the contractor for any loss sustained as a result of any variance between conditions indicated by or deduced from said report and the actual conditions encountered during the progress of the work. DUST CONTROL: The work includes dust control as required for the alleviation or prevention of any dust nuisance on or about the site or the borrow area, or off-site if caused by the Contractor's operation either during the performance of the earthwork or resulting from the conditions in which the Contractor leaves the site. The Contractor shall assume all liability, including Court costs of codefendants, for all claims related to dust or windblown materials attributable to his work. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation shall consist of site clearing and grabbing and preparations of foundation materials for receiving fill. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: The Contractor shall accept the site in this present condition and shall demolish and/or remove from the area of designated project earthwork all structures,both surface and subsurface, trees, brush, roots, debris, organic matter, and all other matter determined by the Geotechnical Engineer to be deleterious. Such materials shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be removed from the site. Tree root systems in proposed building areas should be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet and to such an extent which would permit removal of all roots larger than 1 inch. Tree root removed in parking areas may be limited to the upper 12 feet of the ground surface. Backfill or tree root excavation should not be permitted until all exposed surfaces have been inspected and the Geotechnical Engineer is present for the proper control of backfill placement and compaction. Burning in areas, which are to receive fill materials, shall not be permitted. SUBGRADE PREPARATION: Surfaces to receive Structural fill shall be prepared as outlined above, excavated/scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture-conditioned as necessary, and compacted to 95 percent compaction. Loose and/or areas of disturbed soils shall be moisture conditioned and compacted to 95 percent compaction. All ruts,hummocks, or other uneven surface features shall be removed by surface grading prior to placement of any fill material. All areas which are to receive fill materials shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the placement of any of the fill material. EXCAVATION: All excavation shall be accomplished to the tolerance normally defined by the Civil Engineer as shown on the project grading plans. All over excavation below the grades specified shall be backfilled at the Contractor's expense and shall be compacted in accordance with the applicable technical requirements. FILL AND BACKFILL MATERIAL: No material shall be moved or compacted without the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer. Material from the required site excavation may be utilized for construction site fills provided prior approval is given by the Geotechnical Engineer. All materials Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Appendix B Page B.1 utilized for constructing site fills shall be free from vegetable or other deleterious matter as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer. PLACEMENT, SPREADING AND COMPACTION: The placement and spreading of approved fill materials and the processing and compaction of approved fill and native materials shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. However, compaction of fill materials by flooding, ponding, or jetting shall not be permitted unless specifically approved by local code,as well as the Geotechnical Engineer. Both cut and fill shall be surface compacted to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer prior to final acceptance. SEASONAL LIMITS: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled while it is frozen or thawing or during unfavorable wet weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until the Geotechnical Engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed fill are as specified. Krazan&Associates,Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States Restoration Programmatic for the State of Washington Specific Project Information Form U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Seattle District,Regulatory I July 29,2008 version In 1 J ; ! " JAN 30 2:114 Use this form to notify the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District(Corps) Oa proposed J/ restoration project that falls within the range of the nine restoration activities co side>`ed"b R Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) .p! its4SaftiOrtOPMENT 7 of the Endangered Species Act(ESA) consultation (NMFS Reference No. 2008/03598;USFWS Reference No. 13410-2008-F-0209). You may also use this form if your project slightly deviates from the description and scope of the nine project categories addressed in this consultation. However, should the resulting impacts exceed those considered in the NMFS and USFWS Biological Opinion you will need to consult individually (which generally takes longer)and potentially provide additional information. The Corps is responsible, in most cases,for ensuring that a project complies with the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Table of Contents I GENERAL INFORMATION 1 II EFFECT DETERMINATIONS FOR FISH SPECIES USFWS&NMFS 8 III EFFECT DETERMINATIONS FOR LISTED TERRESTRIAL SPECIES 15 IV SIGNATURE 22 APPENDIX A: DEWATERING AND FISH CAPTURE PROTOCOL 23 I GENERAL INFORMATION A. Date: September 30, 2013 Corps reference no.: TBD B. Applicant name (same as in JARPA): Deborah Petersen Address: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission 1111 Israel Rd SW; PO Box 42650 Olympia, WA 98504-2650 C. Agent Name(same as on JARPA): Array Edward Stonkus Address: Wild Fish Conservancy Northwest (formerly Washington Trout) PO Box 402, 15629 Main Street Duvall. WA 98019 D. Location(s) of activity: Section: NW'/. Sec 2 Township: 25N Range: 2W Latitude (xxx° xx' xx.x"): 47.687864 N. lat. Longitude (xxx° xx' xx.x"): -129 902694 W long 1 UTM: Zone= 10 Easting= 507302 Northing = 5 81613 Waterbody: Dosewallips River County: Jefferson ESU or IRU: Hood Canal—HUC 1711001805 E. Project elements. In the table below,fill in the maximum length of each project element proposed and the number of structures where applicable. This information will be used by the Services for calculating your take exemption: Action Category Project Length and Width Number of where applicable Structures 1. Fish Passage: a. Culvert Replacement and Relocation b. Retrofitting Culverts Replace culverts with a 30' One. span/27' width bridge. c. Culvert Removal 70' long and 3' diameter. Two. d. Tidegate Removal e. Removal or Modification of —230' length and 8' width. None. Sediment Bars or Terraces f. Temporary Placement of Temporary sandbag and plastic 1 at upstream end. Sandbags,Hay Bales and sheeting cofferdam, 8' long x None needed at Ecology Blocks 4' wide. downstream end. g. Construction of Structures to Provide Passage over Small Dams 2. Installation of Instream Structures: a. Placement of Woody Debris 1,060-feet long by 30-feet 100 pieces of LWD. wide. b. Placement of Live Stakes 1,020-feet long by 30-feet —754. wide. c. Placement of Engineered Log Jams 2 Action Category Project Length and Width Number of where applicable Structures d. Grade Control ELJs e. Trapping Mobile Wood f. Placement of Boulders g. Boulder Weirs and Roughened Channels h. Gravel Placement Associated -50'-long by 8'-wide. None. with Structure Placement 3. Levee Removal and Modification 4. Side Channel/Off Channel 1,060-foot by-30- to -50'- None. Habitat Restoration and wide new channel and Reconnection floodplain. 5. Salmonid Spawning Gravel Restoration 6. Forage Fish Spawning Gravel Restoration 7. Hardened Fords and Fencing for Livestock Stream Crossings 8. Irrigation Screen Installation and Replacement 9. Debris and Structure Removal F. Description of the proposed work: The project is intended to correct a fish passage barrier on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and is part of the tribal lawsuit requiring the State to correct fish passage barriers in WRIA's 1-23 for anadromous fish. The project will replace two existing culverts with a bridge, relocate -1,060 feet of the Twana Creek channel and restore habitat in the new stream reach. There are ten large multiple-stemmed maple trees that have been designated as hazard trees by the State Park arborist and will be removed as part of the project. The trees are located adjacent to the existing channel along the State Park entrance road. The trees will be retained for use as habitat features in the new channel and floodplain. Additionally - 100 pieces of LWD will be added to the new channel and floodplain. The streambanks above and below the new bridge installation will be bioengineered and planted with native species. Two septic drainfields will be abandoned. The septic systems pipes and any contaminated soils will be removed. The disturbance footprint for the project is 1.20 acres. After the project's completion - 0.56 acres will be replanted with native vegetation. 3 The barriers (ID #997962) consist of two corrugated metal pipe culverts that are misaligned to shop area. Because of the misalignment of these culverts, the stream also jumps its channel and flows into the park campground area, flooding the restroom drainfield as it sheet flows across the campground. The project will replace the culverts with a pre-fabricated low-profile steel bridge, with concrete decking, and construct a new channel and floodplain for Twana Creek that will capture floodwaters and sediment loads and prevent flooding of the park campground and drainfield. The project will address fish passage, habitat, and flooding issues in Dosewallips State Park. All work will be performed when the seasonal creek is dry. Channel Modification / Dredging: A small bobcat excavator and dumptrucks will be used to scalp a sediment depositional area within the Twana Creek channel that extends 230 feet upstream of the new bridge. A pilot thalweg will be constructed within the reach. The dredging /sediment scalping will take place in the existing 100-year floodplain of Twana Creek. Twana Creek will be relocated and a new low-flow channel and floodplain constructed for a distance of- 1,060 feet. Trackhoes and dumptrucks will be used to excavate and remove material. Excavators will be used to remove large maple trees (roots intact). The trees will be retained on site to be used as habitat features within the new channel and floodplain. In total approximately 100-pieces of LWD will be placed within the stream and floodplain. For the most part the construction of the new channel and floodplain for Twana Creek is located outside of the existing 100-year floodplain of Twana Creek. The new channel and floodplain alignment is located in an open grassy area and will be reconnected at its lower end to the existing Twana Creek channel. The relocation of the new Twana Creek channel and floodplain requires the removal of two septic drainfields. All pipes and any contaminated soils associated with the drainfields will be removed in accordance with septic removal and abandonment standards to be determined by Jefferson County. G. Project timing: Start date: August 15, 2014 Start Date In-water Work: August 21, 2014 End date: September 30, 2014 End Date In-water Work: September 21, 2014 H. Anticipated cubic feet per second (CFS) of stream at time of construction: 0 cfs. The creek is seasonal and construction will be done during the dry period. The stream usually does not start to exhibit surface flows until after November rt. I. How much area do you propose to clear for temporary access? Less than 0.25 acres. J. How many trees and what sizes will be felled for temporary access? Ten designated hazard trees. K. Will your temporary access traverse across slopes steeper than 30%? No. 4 L. How many temporary stream crossings do you propose? List all best management practices (BMPs) proposed to avoid and minimize impacts from stream crossings. None. M. Culvert replacements: A full spanning bridge will replace the existing culverts. The design has been internally reviewed by WDFW staff as required by the project sponsor (WSDOP). 1. Append the applicable"Summary Form for Fish-Passage Design Data"that can be found in the WDFW Culvert Manual((Bates et al. 2003)Appendix F). 2. Append maintenance plan that shows that culvert will be in design condition prior to each fish passage season. 3. If your project is in gradients 6— 10%and a bridge is not feasible,use stream simulation option and provide annual monitoring data of substrate, invert elevation,and channel form (elements of roughened channel:boulders,pools, low flow channel)including a picture prior to each migration season. 4. If your culvert is longer than 150 feet include tribal comments. If you discussed your design with WDFW, include WDFW comments or a record of your conversation with WDF W. 5. Are you increasing the amount of rip-rap. If so,by how much? 6. Describe how proper ecological functions(bedload movement,debris movement, flood flows) in addition to fish passage will be met. 7. If you are increasing the length or width of a road: a. Quantify the increased impervious surface created as a result of this activity. b. List measures that you propose to use to avoid impacts to resources and water quality. Note: Permanent road improvements that result in increased traffic or development are not permitted under this PBA. N. Rock grade control structures: How much combined rock is proposed for structures? None. O. Removal or modification of sediment bars or terraces: Has there been previous removal of sediment at this location? If yes when and how much? Yes, over the years when the existing channel and culvert system was overwhelmed with sediment being transported from upstream. The problem is chronic and part of the reason there is an existing fish passage barrier. It is unknown how much material was previously removed for maintenance purposes. P. Side Channel/Off Channel Habitat Creation: A new channel and floodplain for Twana Creek will be constructed. 1. Has a reach assessment or analysis been conducted for this project?Yes. 5 2 How many years will the project take to complete? —Three weeks. 3. Demonstrate sufficient hydrology for a self-sustaining channel. The hydrology currently supports an existing channel that flows parallel to an existing road within the State Park. The new channel location will be constructed in ancient river floodplain strata. The native material is conducive to maintaining the current hydrology. Q. Will you be isolating the work area? Yes, for localized impacts from rainfall. The project will be constructed in the dry. The creek is seasonal with a very well documented period of dry and wet periods. The decision to work during the seasonal dry period will eliminate the chance for turbid water to be released into the creek. The typical hydrological response of the stream is to see surface flows start after the beginning of November. Rains occurring before that period of time will allow any residual fine material generated by construction of the new channel and floodplain to be distributed into the interstitial voids of the new substrate before surface flows begin. R. Give a maximum estimate for the duration and length of downstream turbidity impacts. The Services will use this estimate for giving you your take exemption. (During construction you will be monitoring downstream sedimentation every 20 min to verify/refine your given estimate.) There will be no downstream turbidity impacts during construction. The project will be constructed and completed before the dry season ends and before surface flows are established during the rainy season. S. Explain what equipment will generate noise above ambient levels and for what p eriod during the day and for how many days. Maintenance at the State Park involves a number of activities that generate significant ambient levels of noise including lawn mowing,and the use of chain saws. Ambient noise levels may be exceeded periodically during the day. The primary heavy construction equipment to be used consists of a trackhoe and dump trucks. These may generate noise for periods of up to 9 hours per day from 7:30AM to 4:30PM. The estimated construction time is three weeks. T. Please attach HPA or explain why you do not need one. An HPA application is pending. U. If your project does not meet all of the criteria outlined in the PBA,but is a restoration action of similar scope and impacts,contact the Services with the project's description, conservation measures and reason(s) it may not currently fit under the PBA. Provide below any supporting conversations with NMFS and/or USFWS staff, including a list of the PBA criteria your project won't meet. This is a living document. We are continuously working on refining the proposed/covered actions and conservation measures. 6 The project as proposed meets the description and conservation measure criteria outlined in the PBA. The proposed project will also comply with the General Conservation Measures as outlined in the PBA. 7 II EFFECT DETERMINATIONS FOR FISH SPECIES USFWS& NMFS Each project should have the appropriate effect determination. The PBA allows for No Effect(NE), Not Likely to Adversely Affect(NLAA),or Likely to Adversely Affect(LAA)determinations for listed species. Each determination must be adequately documented in this form. If you need assistance in determining the appropriate effect determination, consult the Corps, USFWS,and NMFS staff. Check all currently listed evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) or Interim Recovery Units (IRUs) that may occur in the fifth field watershed where the project is located. Endangered Upper Columbia River Spring-run Chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) _ Snake River Sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) Upper Columbia River Steelhead(Oncorhynchus mykiss) Threatened d Bull trout, Coastal/Puget Sound IRU (Salvelinus confluentus) Bull trout, Columbia River IRU(Salvelinus confluentus) Coho salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU (0. kisutch) Chinook salmon, Lower Columbia River ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) d Chinook salmon, Puget Sound ESU(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Chinook salmon, Snake River Spring/Summer-run ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Chinook salmon, Snake River Fall-run ESU(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Chum salmon, Columbia River ESU (Oncorhynchus keta) Chum salmon, Hood Canal summer ESU(Oncorhynchus keta) Steelhead trout,Lower Columbia River ESU (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead trout, Middle Columbia River ESU(Oncorhynchus mykiss) • Steelhead trout, Coastal/Puget Sound DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Steelhead trout, Snake River ESU (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Designated Critical habitat for Coastal/Puget Sound bull trout IRU Critical habitat for Columbia River bull trout IRU Critical habitat for Columbia River chum salmon ESU ✓ Critical habitat for Hood Canal summer chum salmon ESU Critical habitat for Lower Columbia River Chinook salmon ESU Critical habitat for Upper Columbia River Spring-run Chinook salmon ESU Critical habitat for Snake River Spring/Summer-run Chinook salmon ESU Critical habitat for Snake River Fall-run Chinook salmon ESU ✓ Critical habitat for Puget Sound Chinook salmon ESU Critical habitat for Lower Columbia River steelhead trout ESU Critical habitat for Upper Columbia River steelhead trout ESU Critical habitat for Middle Columbia River steelhead trout ESU Critical habitat for Snake River steelhead trout ESU 8 Lake Ozette Sockeye salmon are not covered by this programmatic at this time. Directions: Use the Notes section under each question to document your rational and decision making process for presence or absence of the fish, and the effect determination. FILL OUT THIS SECTION FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL ESU THAT OCCURS IN THE FIFTH FIELD WATERSHED Effect Determination by Species: ESU and critical habitat: Bull trout, Coastal/Puget Sound IRU (Salvelinus confluentus) 1) Is the project in a fifth- field watershed that contains or has the potential to contain Bull trout? YES '/ If yes, list fifth field watershed, and go to question 2. Fifth-field watershed: Dosewallips River HUC 1711001805 NO If no,the project will have "No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 2) Do the stream(s) in which impacts may occur contain suitable habitat for Bull trout? For bull trout use Tables 1 & 2 of Appendix A and/or the draft recovery plans (available at: http://www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltroutirecovery.html)and a distribution map the USFWS posted at http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/index.html to determine if your project is within critical habitat for bull trout. For other salmon you may use the NMFS critical habitat web page at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-HabitatlCritical-Habitat/CH-Maps.cfm determine if your project is within critical habitat. YES If yes, what type of habitat is present? Spawning Rearing Migratory Corridor Not known Go to Question 3. NO V If no, the project will have"No Effect" on Bull trout. Go to question 5. Notes: Twana Creek does not have any suitable habitat for Bull trout. The seasonal stream has flows for— 8 months of the year. 3) Approximately how far is the project from the nearest suitable habitat(in river miles, upstream or downstream) for (insert species) ? 9 (insert answer here) Go to question 4. Notes: 4) Does the proposed activity have the potential to alter or affect the following indicators: temperature, sediment, chemical contamination/nutrients, physical barriers, substrate embeddedness, large woody debris, pool frequency,pool quality,off-channel habitat,refugia,wetted width/depth ratio, streambank condition, floodplain connectivity,peak/base flows, drainage network, disturbance history, function of riparian reserves, or disturbance regime? YES If yes,briefly explain which habitat elements will be affected and indicate if the effects will be short term or long-term. For example, many activities will have increased levels of turbidity during project implementation,but are expected to result in long-term improvements to the target indicators. NO If no,the project will have "No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 4. Notes: 5) Provide rationale for effect determination. Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that flows into the Dosewallips estuary. It supports a run of Coho salmon. There is no suitable habitat in Twana Creek to support Bull trout.There is no designated critical habitat for bull trout in the Dosewallips River system. Although suitable habitat is present in the system,there is no known reproducing population in the river. Effect Determination: No Effect Bull trout, Coastal/Puget Sound IRU (Salvelinus confluentus) Note: If you are dewatering an area, electroshocking in an area, or are doing major in-water work where listed salmonids are likely to be present during the work window,you will probably have a LAA effect determination. 10 Effect Determination by Species: ESU and critical habitat: Chinook salmon, Puget Sound ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) 1) Is the project in a fifth - field watershed that contains or has the potential to contain Chinook salmon? YES If yes, list fifth field watershed, and go to question 2. Fifth-field watershed: HUC 1711001805 Dosewallips River NO If no,the project will have "No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 2) Do the stream(s) in which impacts may occur contain suitable habitat for Chinook salmon? For bull trout use Tables 1 & 2 of Appendix A and/or the draft recovery plans(available at: http://www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltrout/recovery.html) and a distribution map the USFWS posted at http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/index.html to determine if your project is within critical habitat for bull trout. For other salmon you may use the NMFS critical habitat web page at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Habitat/Critical-HabitatJCH-Maps.cfm determine if your project is within critical habitat. YES If yes, what type of habitat is present? Spawning Rearing Migratory Corridor Not known Go to Question 3. NO V If no,the project will have"No Effect"on Chinook salmon. Go to question 5. Notes: Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that does not possess the habitat or flow regime required for Chinook salmon use or presence. 3) Approximately how far is the project from the nearest suitable habitat(in river miles, upstream or downstream) for (insert species) ? (insert answer here) Go to question 4. Notes: 11 4) Does the proposed activity have the potential to alter or affect the following indicators: temperature, sediment, chemical contamination/nutrients,physical barriers, substrate embeddedness, large woody debris,pool frequency,pool quality,off-channel habitat,refugia,wetted width/depth ratio, streambank condition, floodplain connectivity, peak/base flows, drainage network,disturbance history,function of riparian reserves, or disturbance regime? YES If yes, briefly explain which habitat elements will be affected and indicate if the effects will be short term or long-term. For example, many activities will have increased levels of turbidity during project implementation,but are expected to result in long-term improvements to the target indicators. NO If no,the project will have"No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 5) Provide rationale for effect determination. Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that flows into the Dosewallips estuary. It supports a small run of Coho salmon. There is no history of use by Chinook salmon nor is there any suitable habitat for any life stage of Chinook salmon. Effect Determination: No Effect Chinook salmon, Puget Sound ESU (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Note: If you are dewatering an area, electroshocking in an area,or are doing major in-water work where listed salmonids are likely to be present during the work window,you will probably have a LAA effect determination. 12 Effect Determination by Species: ESU and critical habitat: Chum salmon, Hood Canal summer ESU (Oncorhynchus keta) 1) Is the project in a fifth- field watershed that contains or has the potential to contain Chinook salmon? YES V If yes, list fifth field watershed, and go to question 2. Fifth-field watershed: Dosewallips River HUC 1711001805 NO If no,the project will have "No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 2) Do the stream(s) in which impacts may occur contain suitable habitat for Chum salmon? For bull trout use Tables 1 &2 of Appendix A and/or the draft recovery plans(available at: http://www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltrout/recovery.html) and a distribution map the USFWS posted at http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/index.html to determine if your project is within critical habitat for bull trout. For other salmon you may use the NMFS critical habitat web page at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Habitat/Critical-Habitat/CH-Maps.cfm determine if your project is within critical habitat. YES If yes, what type of habitat is present? Spawning Rearing Migratory Corridor Not known Go to Question 3. NO V If no,the project will have"No Effect"on Chum salmon. Go to question 5. Notes: 3)Approximately how far is the project from the nearest suitable habitat(in river miles, upstream or downstream) for (insert species) ? (insert answer here) Go to question 4. Notes: 13 4) Does the proposed activity have the potential to alter or affect the following indicators: temperature, sediment, chemical contamination/nutrients,physical barriers, substrate embeddedness, large woody debris,pool frequency, pool quality, off-channel habitat, refugia,wetted width/depth ratio, streambank condition, floodplain connectivity, peak/base flows,drainage network, disturbance history, function of riparian reserves, or disturbance regime? YES _ If yes,briefly explain which habitat elements will be affected and indicate if the effects will be short term or long-term. For example,many activities will have increased levels of turbidity during project implementation,but are expected to result in long-term improvements to the target indicators. NO _ If no, the project will have"No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 5) Provide rationale for effect determination. Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that flows into the Dosewallips estuary. It supports a small run of Coho salmon. There is no history of use by Chum salmon nor is there any suitable habitat for any life stage of Chum salmon. Effect Determination: No Effect Chum salmon, Hood Canal summer ESU (Oncorhynchus keta) Note: If you are dewatering an area,electroshocking in an area, or are doing major in-water work where listed salmonids are likely to be present during the work window,you will probably have a LAA effect determination. 14 Effect Determination by Species: ESU and critical habitat: Steelhead trout, Coastal/Puget Sound DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 1) Is the project in a fifth- field watershed that contains or has the potential to contain Steelhead trout? YES If yes, list fifth field watershed, and go to question 2. Fifth-field watershed: Dosewallips River HUC 1711001805 NO If no, the project will have "No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 2) Do the stream(s) in which impacts may occur contain suitable habitat for Steelhead trout? For bull trout use Tables 1 & 2 of Appendix A and/or the draft recovery plans(available at: http://www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltrout/recovery.html)and a distribution map the USFWS posted at http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/index.html to determine if your project is within critical habitat for bull trout. For other salmon you may use the NMFS critical habitat web page at http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Habitat/Critical-Habitat/CH-Maps.cfm determine if your project is within critical habitat. YES _ If yes, what type of habitat is present? Spawning Rearing Migratory Corridor Not known Go to Question 3. NO 1/ If no, the project will have"No Effect"on Steelhead trout. Go to question 5. Notes: 3) Approximately how far is the project from the nearest suitable habitat(in river miles, upstream or downstream) for_? (insert answer here) Go to question 4. Notes: 4) Does the proposed activity have the potential to alter or affect the following indicators: temperature, sediment, chemical contamination/nutrients,physical barriers, substrate embeddedness, large woody debris,pool frequency,pool quality, off-channel habitat,refugia, wetted width/depth 15 • ratio, streambank condition, floodplain connectivity,peak/base flows, drainage network, disturbance history, function of riparian reserves,or disturbance regime? YES If yes, briefly explain which habitat elements will be affected and indicate if the effects will be short term or long-term. For example,many activities will have increased levels of turbidity during project implementation,but are expected to result in long-term improvements to the target indicators. NO If no,the project will have"No Effect"on (insert species). Go to question 5. Notes: 5) Provide rationale for effect determination. Twana Creek is a small seasonal stream that flows into the Dosewallips estuary. It supports a small run of Coho salmon. There is no history of use by Steelhead trout nor is there any suitable habitat. Effect Determination: No Effect Steelhead trout, Coastal/Puget Sound DPS (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Note: If you are dewatering an area,electroshocking in an area,or are doing major in-water work where listed salmonids are likely to be present during the work window,you will probably have a LAA effect determination. 16 III EFFECT DETERMINATIONS FOR LISTED TERRESTRIAL SPECIES 1. To determine which listed species may occur in the project area follow the steps below: a. Obtain a county species list from the USFWS web page. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE List/endangeredSpecies.asp http://www.fws.gov/easternwashington/county%20speci es%201ists.htm b. Site-specific information of listed species occurrences in Washington State may be obtained from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Program http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm and from the Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program at http://www.dnr.wa.govinhp/. c. Remove species from the species list when habitat is not available for the species in the project area or"vicinity of activity" (generally 1 mile radius around the project site. The area that may be affected by any project impacts including noise and turbidity.) 2. When filling out the information below consider: Each project should have the appropriate effect determination. The PBA allows for NE or NLTAA determinations for terrestrial species,and NE,NLTAA or LTAA for aquatic species. Each determination must be adequately documented in this form. If you need assistance in determining the appropriate effect determination, request help from a Corps ESA Coordinator or the USFWS. The USFWS contact is Tom McDowell at 360-753-9426. a. For information on species biology,range and critical habitat use the USFWS web site: http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/index.html b. Conservation Measures are listed in Appendix B c. If you do not implement all conservation measures related to the species present please explain. LISTED TERRESTRIAL SPECIES Please refer to the PBA for actions that may affect these species and conservation measures to protect terrestrial species. For information on the listed terrestrial and aquatic species that occur in Washington,visit the following website: ecos.fws.gov or contact the following FWS field offices: Western Washington Office in Lacey: (360) 753-6044 John Grettenberger Central Washington Office in Wenatchee: (509)665-3508 Jessica Gonzales Eastern Washington office in Spokane: (509) 891-6839 Suzanne Audet COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS Listed Species: Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), Oregon silverspot butterfly(Speyeria zerene hippolyta),and Snowy Plover(Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus): a) Will the activity occur in Grays Harbor, Wahkiakum, Pacific,Jefferson or Clallam Counties? No Put NE under"Effect Determination" for these three coastal species. 17 Yes V If yes go to b) b) Will the activity alter sand islands or coastal dunes and meadows in Grays Harbor or Pacific County? No V Yes If yes,contact the FWS office in Lacey for coordination. c) Conservation Measures to be applied: d) Effect Determination for coastal species and rationale: NE LOWER COLUMBIA Listed species: Columbian white-tailed deer(Odocoileus virginianus leucurus) a) Will the activity occur on islands or in the floodplain of the lower Columbia River(Wahkiakum and Cowlitz Counties)and include installing fence? No Yes If yes, apply conservation measures for the Columbian white-tailed deer b) Effect Determination and rationale: NE CARNIVORES and CARIBOU 1. Gray Wolf(Canis lupus)—The range of the grey wolf includes the Blue Mountains, northeast Washington(Rocky Mountains)and the Cascade Mountains. There are no confirmed records of wolves west of the Cascade Crest and no documented den sites in the state. 2. Grizzly Bear(Ursus arctus horribillis)—The grizzly bear recovery plan identifies high alpine areas in the North Cascades(north of Interstate 90 to the Canadian border)as important for recovery of this species in Washington. 3. Canada lynx(Lynx Canadensis) -This species occurs in high elevation forests(generally above 4,000 feet) in the North Cascades and northeast Washington. 4. The woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou)occurs in high elevation forests(generally above 4,000 feet) in northeast Washington(Pend Oreille County). a) Will the activity be conducted in or near mountain meadows or forest openings,high elevation forests, or ungulate wintering or calving sites in the geographic areas where these listed species may occur? No Yes If yes,apply the appropriate seasonal restrictions identified in the PBA to minimize disturbance If you do not know whether your project will affect suitable habitat or feeding areas for these species, please contact the USFWS office in Spokane. 18 a) Effect Determination for these species and rationale. NE Document any supporting conversations with USFWS staff: Pygmy rabbit(Brachylagus idahoensis) 1. The pygmy rabbit historically was found in dense, tall sagebrush areas east of the Columbia River (Douglas,Adams,Lincoln, Grant and Benton Counties). a) Will the activity occur in native sagebrush areas of the central Columbia Plateau? No V Put NE under"Effect Determination" and proceed to next species. Yes If yes, contact the USFWS. d) Effect Determination and rationale: NE MATURE FORESTS in the CASCADE and OLYMPIC MOUNTAINS: Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus) For information on the marbled murrelet, see http://www.fws.gov/pacific/marbledmurrelet/index.html a)Are you within 50 miles of marine water? No Put NE under"Effect Determination"and proceed to next species Yes V b) Is there suitable habitat(mature conifer-dominated forests over 80 years old)within 200 feet of the project vicinity? No V Yes Not known c) Will the activity generate noise above ambient levels within 200 feet(1.0 mile if blasting, low- elevation aircraft operations, or pile driving) of potential suitable nesting habitat? No V Yes If yes, apply conservation measures to minimize disturbance. d) Does the activity include low elevation operation of aircraft,pile driving, or blasting within 1 mile of suitable or occupied nesting or foraging habitat? No V Yes If yes, apply seasonal restrictions to minimize disturbance. Activities in the marine environment that include pile driving or blasting may need to go through individual consultation. Contact the USFWS office in Lacey for specific restrictions related to underwater sound in marine areas. e) Will the project affect suitable nesting habitat or designated critical for marbled murrelets? Activities that remove or kill trees with suitable platforms,remove suitable platforms, or reduce the suitability of the stand as nesting habitat are not covered under this PBA. No. f) Notes: 19 g) Conservation Measures to be applied: h) Effect Determination and rationale:NE. There is no suitable marbled murrelet habitat within the action area or the vicinity of the project. Northern spotted owl(Strix occidentalis caurina) For information, including critical habitat designation see http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/SpeciesReport.do?spcode=B08B a) Is there suitable habitat(mature conifer forests over 80 years old)within 200 feet of the project vicinity? No d Put NE under"Effect Determination"and proceed to next species Yes Not known b) What type of forest habitat is present in the vicinity of the activity? nesting or foraging habitat dispersal habitat designated critical habitat none d) Will the activity occur in nesting or foraging habitat? No Yes If yes, apply seasonal operating restrictions to minimize disturbance. e) Will the activity generate above ambient noise within 200 feet(1.0 mile if blasting,pile driving or aircraft operations)of suitable nesting habitat? No Yes If yes, apply seasonal restrictions. f) Will the activity occur in or remove trees from spotted owl designated critical habitat? No Yes If yes,explain how/if this will affect the function of the stand. g) Notes: h) Conservation Measures to be applied: i) Effect Determination for northern spotted owls: NE Effect Determination for designated critical habitat for the northern spotted owl: NE Listed Plants: No herbicide use,mechanical vegetation management, or construction activities are permitted in areas that could support listed plants under this programmatic. 20 Information on these species can be found at: http://ecos.fws.gov,the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Program at(360)-902-2543 or their website at www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm, or the Washington Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program at(360)902-1667 or their website at www.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/. 1. Hackelia venusta (showy stickseed)this species occurs in Chelan County, between 984 and 1,600 feet in elevation, in the Ponderosa Pine zone 2. Lomatium bradshawii(Bradshaw's desert-parsley)—this species occurs in wetlands,prairies and grasslands in Clark County 3. Sidalcea oregano var. calva(Wenatchee Mountains checker-mallow) -this species is found in the Peshastin Creek watersheds in Chelan County. Information on critical habitat for this species can be found at: http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr3793.pdf 4. Castilleja levisecta(golden paintbrush)-this plant occurs in Island, San Juan, and Thurston Counties and is found in open grasslands, prairies, and grass dominated coastal bluffs. 5. Howellia aquatilis(water hwellia)—this aquatic plant is found in and around seasonal wetlands in Mason, Pierce, Thurston, Clark, and Spokane Counties. 6.Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii(Kincaids lupine)-this plant occurs near Boistfort, Lewis County in native upland prairie habitat. 7. Sidalcea nelsoniana(Nelson's checkermallow)-this plant is found in wetlands, stream corridors, or wet prairies in Lewis or Cowlitz Counties. 8.Silene spaldingii(Spalding's silene/catchfly)—this plant is also associated with native prairies and occurs in Asotin,Lincoln, Spokane, and Whitman Counties. 9. Spiranthes diluvialis(Ute ladies'-tresses)—this plant grows on the margins of springs,wet meadows, floodplains, and riparian areas in Okanagon and Grant County Please document conversations with USFWS staff and provide adequate information on botanical surveys and/or habitat analysis to support your effect determination. Effect determination for listed plants: NE 21 i • 14 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL Coastal Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-See appeal process at end of HPA Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: December 09,2013 Control Number: 132315-1 Project Expiration Date: September 30,2016 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission Wild Fish Conservancy Northwest ATTENTION: Deborah Petersen ATTENTION:Amy Stonkus P.O. Box 42650 P.O. Box 402 Olympia, WA 98504 Duvall, WA 98019 � n 360-902-8634 206-349-3955 �� r--- V Fax: 360-586-0207 Fax:425-788-9634 I), � �� Project Name: Twana Creek Fish Passage Barrier Removal/Resfiorje, Project Description: Replace two existing culverts with a bridge, re-locate approximately feet of the Twana Creek channel, and restore habitat iituthernewlatreafoLopromT reach. PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: Project work below the ordinary high water line shall only occur during the following time periods: June 15 to September 30 of calendar years 2014, 2015, and 2016. 2. Work shall be accomplished per plans and specifications entitled "Dosewallips State Park, Twana Creek Fish Barrier#997962 Removal and Restoration Project" and submitted with application to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA). A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 3. All work below the ordinary high water line shall be conducted while the stream is dry. 4. Per plans and specifications referenced in Provision #2 above, this HPA authorizes removal of the double culverts, installation of a permanent bridge, filling of the existing scour hole, and construction of a permanent new channel and floodplain with streambed materials and large wood which will provide habitat and cover for migrating fish. PERMANENT BRIDGE INSTALLATION 5. Excavation for and placement of the foundation and superstructure shall be outside the ordinary high water line of the stream. 6. The bridge structure shall be placed in a manner to minimize damage to the streambed and banks. 7. The bridge shall be constructed to pass the 100-year peak flow with consideration of debris likely to be encountered. 8. Abutments, sills, approach fills, armor rock, etc., shall not constrict the flow and cause any appreciable increase (not to exceed 0.2 feet) in backwater elevation (calculated at the 100-year Page 1 of 5 Washington HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL `'"°"°' • '_ Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -See appeal process at end of HPA Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: December 09,2013 Control Number: 132315-1 Project Expiration Date:September 30,2016 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A flood)or channel-wide scour, and shall be aligned to cause the least effect on the hydraulics of the stream. 9. The bridge shall be constructed in a way that does not allow aggregate or earthen material (dirt, mud, etc.) to fall into the stream. Splash guards or curbs shall be installed and maintained to prevent the entry of this material into the stream. 10. Approach material shall be structurally stable and shall be composed of material that if eroded into the water shall not be detrimental to fish life. 11. The use of bridge components treated with creosote or pentachlorophenol is not authorized by this HPA. 12. The bridge shall be constructed in a way that does not allow water to drain onto or accumulate on the bridge surface. EQUIPMENT, WATER QUALITY, and SITE RESTORATION 13. The use of equipment below the ordinary high water line shall be limited to that necessary to gain position for work. 14. Equipment shall be free of external petroleum-based products while working around the stream channel. Equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and any necessary repairs shall be completed prior to commencing work activities. 15. Fresh concrete or concrete by-products shall not be allowed to enter the stream channel at any time during this project. All forms used for concrete shall be completely sealed to prevent the possibility of fresh concrete getting into the aquatic system. 16. Extreme care shall be taken to ensure that no petroleum products, hydraulic fluid, cement, grout, preservatives, paint products, chemicals, or any other toxic or deleterious materials are allowed to enter or leach into the aquatic system. Treated wood sawdust and metal shavings resulting from the drilling of holes shall also be totally contained and removed from the work site. 17. All waste material such as the old culverts, construction debris, excess dirt, or spoils resulting from this project shall be deposited above the limits of flood water at an approved upland disposal site. 18. Every effort shall be taken during all phases of this project to ensure that sediment-laden water is not allowed to enter the aquatic system. This may require the use of sandbags, silt fencing, or pumping dirty wastewater from within the work area to a suitable receiving area. 19. Project activities shall not degrade water quality downstream to the detriment of fish life. Page 2 of 5 • • 1 Washington Coastal Department of HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL 48 Devonshire Road • FISH and RCW 77.55.021-See appeal process at end of HPA Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: December 09,2013 Control Number: 132315-1 Project Expiration Date: September 30, 2016 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A 20. Disturbance of the streambed, banks, and riparian vegetation shall be limited to that necessary to construct the project. Within seven calendar days of project completion, all disturbed areas shall be protected from erosion using grass seed, hay/straw mulch, erosion control matting, or other effective means. Within one year of project completion, the banks shall be revegetated with native or other approved woody species. PROJECT LOCATIONS Location #1 306996 US Highway 101 WORK START: June 15, 2014 IWORK END: September 30, 2016 WRIA: Waterbody: Tributary to: 16.0442 Dosewallips River Hood Canal 1/4 SEC: Section: Township: Range: Latitude: Longitude: County: NW 1/4 02 25 N 02 W N 47.687864 W 122.902694 Jefferson Location#1 Driving Directions The project is located in Dosewallips State Park, in the town of Brinnon,Jefferson County,Washington. The park entrance road is located off Highway 101 just south of the Dosewallips River Bridge.The culverts are located underneath the entrance road just as the road bends towards the campground and adjacent to the park shop area. The project stream is Twana Creek, a tributary of the Dosewallips River estuary. APPLY TO ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS This Hydraulic Project Approval pertains only to those requirements of the Washington State Hydraulic Code, specifically Chapter 77.55 RCW(formerly RCW 77.20). Additional authorization from other public agencies may be necessary for this project. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued is responsible for applying for and obtaining any additional authorization from other public agencies(local, state and/or federal)that may be necessary for this project. This Hydraulic Project Approval shall be available on the job site at all times and all its provisions followed by the person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work. This Hydraulic Project Approval does not authorize trespass. The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued and operator(s)performing the work may be held liable for any loss or damage to fish life or fish habitat that results from failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued under RCW 77.55.021 are subject to additional restrictions,conditions,or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that changed conditions require such action.The person(s)to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right to appeal those decisions. Procedures for filing appeals are listed below. Page 3 of 5 Department of 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-See appeal process at end of HPA Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: December 09,2013 Control Number: 132315-1 Project Expiration Date:September 30,2016 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS HPA:You may request approval of minor modifications to the required work timing or to the plans and specifications approved in this HPA.A minor modification to the required work timing means up to a one-week deviation from the timing window in the HPA when there are no spawning or incubating fish present within the vicinity of the project.You may request subsequent minor modifications to the required work timing.A minor modification of the plans and specifications means any changes in the materials,characteristics or construction of your project that does not alter the project's impact to fish life or habitat and does not require a change in the provisions of the HPA to mitigate the impacts of the modification. Minor modifications do not require you to pay additional application fees or be issued a new HPA.To request a minor modification to your HPA, submit a written request that clearly indicates you are requesting a minor modification to an existing HPA. Include the HPA number and a description of the requested change and send by mail to:Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,PO Box 43234,Olympia, Washington 98504-3234,or by email to HPAapplications @dfw.wa.gov. Do not include payment with your request. You should allow up to 45 days for the department to process your request. MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS HPA:You may request approval of major modifications to any aspect of your HPA. Any approved change other than a minor modification to your HPA will require issuance of a new HPA. If you paid an application fee for your original HPA you must include payment of$150 with your written request or request billing to an account previously established with the department. If you did not pay an application fee for the original HPA,no fee is required for a change to it.To request a major modification to your HPA,submit a written request that clearly indicates you are requesting a major modification to an existing HPA. Include the HPA number,check number or billing account number,and a description of the requested change.Send your written request and payment,if applicable,by mail to: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, PO Box 43234,Olympia,Washington 98504-3234. If you are charging the fee to a billing account number or you are not subject to the fee,you may email your request to HPAapplications @dfw.wa.gov.You should allow up to 45 days for the department to process your request. APPEALS INFORMATION if you wish to appeal the issuance,denial,conditioning,or modification of a Hydraulic Project Approval(HPA), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)recommends that you first contact the department employee who issued or denied the HPA to discuss your concerns. Such a discussion may resolve your concerns without the need for further appeal action. If you proceed with an appeal,you may request an informal or formal appeal. WDFW encourages you to take advantage of the informal appeal process before initiating a formal appeal.The informal appeal process includes a review by department management of the HPA or denial and often resolves issues faster and with less legal complexity than the formal appeal process.If the informal appeal process does not resolve your concerns,you may advance your appeal to the formal process.You may contact the HPA Appeals Coordinator at(360)902-2534 for more information. A. INFORMAL APPEALS:WAC 220-110-340 is the rule describing how to request an informal appeal of WDFW actions taken under Chapter 77.55 RCW. Please refer to that rule for complete informal appeal procedures.The following information summarizes that rule. A person who is aggrieved by the issuance,denial,conditioning, or modification of an HPA may request an informal appeal of that action.You must send your request to WDFW by mail to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator,600 Capitol Way North,Olympia,Washington 98501-1091;e-mail to HPAapplications@dfw.wa.gov;fax to(360)902-2946;or hand-delivery to the Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington St SE,Habitat Program, Fifth floor.WDFW must receive your request within 30 days from the date you receive notice of the decision. If you agree,and you applied for the HPA, resolution of the appeal may be facilitated through an informal conference with the WDFW employee responsible for the decision and a supervisor.If a resolution is not reached through the informal conference,or you are not the person who applied for the HPA,the HPA Appeals Coordinator or designee will conduct an informal hearing and recommend a decision to the Director or designee.If you are not satisfied with the results of the informal appeal,you may file a request for a formal appeal. B. FORMAL APPEALS:WAC 220-110-350 is the rule describing how to request a formal appeal of WDFW actions taken under Chapter 77.55 RCW.Please refer to that rule for complete formal appeal procedures.The following information summarizes that rule. Page 4 of 5 I ' • Department of n T VRHULII, I'f(IJJCh. I HrrKVVHL 48 Devonshire Road FISH and RCW 77.55.021-See appeal process at end of HPA Montesano,WA 98563 WILDLIFE (360)249-4628 Issue Date: December 09,2013 Control Number: 132315-1 Project Expiration Date:September 30,2016 FPA/Public Notice#: N/A A person who is aggrieved by the issuance, denial, conditioning, or modification of an HPA may request a formal appeal of that action. You must send your request for a formal appeal to the clerk of the Pollution Control Hearings Boards and serve a copy on WDFW within 30 days from the date you receive notice of the decision.You may serve WDFW by mail to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501-1091; e-mail to HPAapplications @dfw.wa.gov;fax to(360)902-2946;or hand-delivery to the Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington St SE, Habitat Program, Fifth floor. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal,you may request a formal appeal within 30 days from the date you receive the Director's or designee's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME PERIODS: If there is no timely request for an appeal,the WDFW action shall be final and unappealable. ENFORCEMENT: Sergeant Anderson (47) P2 Habitat Biologist Daniel.Dafoe@dfw.wa.gov for Director Daniel Dafoe 360-457-2516 �'",C 424 te- WDFW CC: Page 5 of 5 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 502021001 Printed: February 10, 2014 Cases Name Review Status Planner Tyne BLD94-00806 WA ST PARKS& RECREATION F Application Received: 11/18/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/21/1994 Case Finaled: 4/16/1997 wildlife viewing platform No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP00-00248 WA ST PARKS& RECREATION F Application Received: 11/1/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/13/2002 Case Finaled: 5/7/2002 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River 1.) Per the letter dated 10-31-01 from the State Parks & Recreation Commission the Vault shall be pumped dry prior to November 1st of each year and the east campground closed from November thru March of each year. This is being done as a mittigative factor allowing the Vault toilet to be installed in a flood plain. 2.) Vault setback to all public wells is 100'. 50' required from the river 3.) Divert all sources of drainage away from the vault area. 4.) Vault to be mono pour and water tight. 5.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 6.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. FPA2612055 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 10/17/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/26/2012 Case Finaled: 10/29/2012 10-acre uneven-aged salvage timber harvest. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD01-00516 MLA01-00481 STATE OF WASHINGTON PARK. I F Kevin Russell Application Received: 9/12/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/12/2001 Case Finaled: 6/18/2002 VAULT TOILET 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 9/4/01 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Floodplain, and Type I Stream. 2.) All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage. 3.) All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b. be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 4.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95. 5.) Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note: Landfills are not permitted in the floodway.)The placement of fill may be utilized to elevate the structure and must comply with the standards and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable. b. Pole, pier or piling construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be used to allow the unrestricted flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one foot above the base flood level. c. Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and constructed to provide open spaces through which water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation walls and basements are not permitted in the floodway.)The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed on foundation walls that extend above grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential construction complies with the requirment of Section 5.101(2), "Residential Construction," regarding the design of enclosed areas. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 1 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 6.) A Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant was drafted for the septic and building permit. The Agreement outlines provisions for the placement of the vault toilet facility. In addition, The Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (Ordinance No. 18-1120-95) identifies the responsibilities of the official. Such responsibilities include: -Make interpretations where necessary and where possibleas to the exact location of boundaries of the areas of flood hazard. -In the absence of detailed base flood elevation data sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this ordinance, the administrator shall obtain and consider the necessary information from federal, state, or other sources, to ensure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness may include use of historical data, high water marks, and photographs of past flooding. Where deemed necessary, a determination by a professional engineer or surveyor may be required. 7.) A mitigation plan was proposed by the Washington Department of Parks and Recreation which includes the following: 1. The applicant shall use the CXT Incorporated toilet facility. 2. The toilet must be closed and locked from November to March. 3. Prior to the toilet closure the facility must be pumped annually by October 31. 8.) The toilet facility must be pumped annually by October 31st. Following pumping of the facility it must be shut and locked for the entire flood season (November- February). The facility can reopen in March. 9.) A Type 1 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a setback of 150-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 10.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 11.) An additional setback of five (5)feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed vault toilet facility. 12.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 354 square feet of impervious surface. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal adhere to Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control sediment and erosion on the subject property. 13.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 14.) The site plan as submitted with the building/septic application on September 4, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 11/28/01 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) The applicant has recorded the Hold Harmless Agreement which is available at the Jefferson County Auditors Office filed 11/27/01. SDP04-00022 MLA04-00356 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS Al I F Kevin Russell Application Received: 6/17/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/12/2004 Case Finaled: Dosewallips State Parks Estuary Restoration Project. The proposal Is o remove an existing dilapidated fence that has been damaged by the elements. The proposal has already undergone SEPA review, with Washington State Parks acting as the lead agency. A threshold determination of non-significance was issued om June 8, 2004. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 6/23/04 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline(Conservancy), Type I Steam, and Wetlands. 2.) This proposal is to conduct in water work to remove a dilapated fence. The fence was originally installed to protect shellfish from predation. The fence is not longer functioning and Washington State Parks is requesting to remove the fence. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)for this activity under Log Number ST-61842-01. The HPA expires on 7/109. 5.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 2 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 7.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation acting as lead agency. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued on July 1, 2004.. 8.) The site plan as submitted with the shoreliine application on 6/10/04 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 7/12/04 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 9.) This approval is for the extraction of a fence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 10.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.6 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 11.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 12.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. SDP04-00033 MLA04-00475 WASHINGTON TROUT I F Greg Ballard Application Received: 7/30/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/11/2004 Case Finaled: A Fish Habitat Enhancement Project of the removal of a dike from a 10 acre salt water marsh located within the boundaries of the Dosewallips State Park. The purpose of the proposal is to improve the function of the Dosewallips River by allowing the river to meander within the salt water marsh. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 4, 2004 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 1 Shoreline (Natural),wetlands, wildlife (heritage& PHS), 100 year floodplain, seismic, aquifer recharge areas, SIPZ, and stormwater. 2.) RCW 77.55.290 (4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. 3.) This proposal has qualified for the streamlined process for Fish Habitat and Enhancement (RCW 77.55.290) projects as indicated by a letter from the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife dated June 17, 2004. The legislature has found that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects to be consistent with the Shoreline Management Act. This project is sponsored by Washington Trout. 4.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 5.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has determined this proposal qualifies as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project (see letter dated June 17, 2004), and will issued a streamline Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA). 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 8.) The approximate 500 cubic yards of excavated material should be disposed at an approved upland location outside of the shoreline jurisdiction and the 100 year floodplain. 9.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). 10.) The site plan as submitted with the Shoreline Exemption application (SDP 04-33) on July 30, 2004 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated August 4, 2004 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 11.) This approval is for activities associated with the removal of a dike a only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. BLD05-00345 MLA05-00327 NORDLAH I F Michelle Farfan Application Received: 5/27/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/18/2005 Case Finaled: 3/15/2007 REPLACE VAULT TOILET BLDG W/ NEW BLDG - BIGGER FOOL PRIN f, SAME PLACE- DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 3 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on June 30, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 3 &5 stream; eagle, elk, harlequin duck, & blue heron; seismic; flood; SUSC aquifer recharge area; coastal SIPZ. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage. 5.) All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b. be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 6.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95. 7.) Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note: Landfills are not permitted in the floodway.) The placement of fill may be utilized to elevate the structure and must comply with the standards and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable. b. Pole, pier or piling construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be used to allow the unrestricted flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one foot above the base flood level. c. Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and constructed to provide open spaces through which water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation walls and basements are not permitted in the floodway.) The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed on foundation walls that extend above grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential construction complies with the requirment of Section 5.101(2), "Residential Construction," regarding the design of enclosed areas. 8.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 9.) A Type 3 & 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the portion of the property that will site the toilet. The streams will require a setback of 100-feet for the Type 3 and 50-feet for the Type 5. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 10.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 11.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Salal(Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 4 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 12.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 13.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 14.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 15.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 3 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 100 feet. The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 50 feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)to the proposed replacement of the vault toilet. 16.) An additional setback of five (5)feet is required from the edge of the stream buffer areas to the proposed vault toilet. 17.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer areas shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 18.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 19.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 20.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: 1. Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 21.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 22.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 23.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 272 square feet of impervious surface and 168 square feet of land disturbing activities. 24.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 5 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 25.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 26.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on May 27, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated June 30, 2005 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 27.) This approval is to replace a vault toilet building with a new building only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 28.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 15%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 29.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 30.) Minimum setback from Highway 101 shall be 50 feet. Minimum side and rear setbacks shall be 20 feet. If an ESA is present, then the more stricter setback shall apply. 31.) Exterior lighting for commercial and industrial uses shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height from the finished grade. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 32.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 33.) The toilet facility must be pumped annually by October 31st. Following pumping of the facility it must be shut and locked for the entire flood season (November- February). The facility can reopen in March. SDP06-00023 MLA06-00353 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I F David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 6/26/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/30/2006 Case Finaled: Streamlined Fish habitat enhancement project- remove a portion of a levee and install six engineered log jams 1.) The proposal is to enhance fish habitat by removing a portion of a levee and installing six engineered log jams in the lower Dosewallips river. 2.) RCW 77.55.290 (4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a streamline Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County. Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic ProjectApproval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. The site plan and JARPA as submitted (SDP06-00023)on June 26, 2006 has been reviewed by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the approved site plan and JARPA dated June 30, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_ParceLCond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 6 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 4.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 5.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 6.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. SDP07-00001 MLA07-00005 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY I F Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 1/9/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/13/2007 Case Finaled: Install and maintain a real-time stream gage on the Dosewallips River. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on February 12, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline Designation -Conservancy, Stable and Modified Shoreline Slope Stability, Type 1 Stream, Great Blue Heron, Harlequin Ducks, Wintering Waterfowl, Swans, Wetlands, Seismic Hazard Area, Frequently Flooded Area, Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ). 2.) The administrator has granted a general exception as allowed in JCC 18.15.205. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 5.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this activity on March 13, 2002 under Log Number 00-F1205-01. The HPA expires on March 20, 2007. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 7.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(i). 9.) The revised site plan as submitted on February 2, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated February 13, 2007 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a stream gage only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development at (360) 379-4450 forty-eight (48) hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure compliance with permit conditions. 12.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program JCC 18.25.090(19) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 13.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 14.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. SDP07-00035 MLA07-00241 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I F David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 5/11/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/31/2008 Case Finaled: APPROVED FOR EX I ENSION - Lower Dosewallips Fish Enhancement and Restoration Project \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 7 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) Based upon information provided in the JARPA, this project meets the requirements for the Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval process for Streamlined Fish Habitat Enhancement un RCW 77.55.181. Should WDFW determine that the project does not meet the streamlined exemption criteria, full permiting will be required. 2.) The proposal will restore and enhance fish habitat to the Lower Dosewallips River and upper estuary by placing and arranging large trees into the river within proximity of the Dosewallips State Park. RCW 77.55.290 (4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. This project is sponsored by Jefferson County Conservation District. Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. 3.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 4.) This approval is for a Shoreline Exemption for a Streamlined Fish Enhancement Process only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 5.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Fish Enhancement Shoreline Exemption application on May 11, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated May 22, 2007 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. BLD08-00486 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F I F Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 11/13/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/2/2009 Case Finaled: 7/13/2009 DEMO EXISTING WELCOME CENTER AT DOSEWALLIPS STAI E HANK 1.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. BLD08-00487 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F I I Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 11/13/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/9/2009 Case Finaled: NEW WELCOME CEN I EH AI UOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK(replaces old) FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1.) This building is approved based on the understanding that the plumbing will be connected to the new off site park septic system by June of 2010 or a new on site septic system permitted and installed to handle the sewage waste from this building. 2.) Failure to elevate at least two feet above the highest adjacent grade may result in higher flood insurance rates. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 8 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 3.) Doug Mackey, State Parks, supplied the following information in an e-mail to staff dated 2/2/2009: "The Welcome Center floor will be built on a slab at an elevation of 25' 6." The edge of the 100-year flood aligned with the historic direction of flow during floods is 215 feet to the east of the building site. The edge of the 500-year flood in this same alignment is 300 feet to the west. The survey provided by Mr. Butler's company shows the construction site elevation is much closer to the 500-year flood level, see the FloodPlain-FEMA.pdf map. Given its elevation, approximately five feet above the near-by 100-year flood level, the proposed construction will be at least reasonably safe from flooding." On February 25, 2009, based on the above information and the flood elevation certificate, the Administrator determined the Welcome Center is reasonably safe from flooding [JCC 15.15.080(1)(e)]. 4.) Construction and site development of the new Welcome Center must comply with all recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences dated October 14, 2008 and the subsequent letter from Associated Earth Sciences dated January 29, 2009. 5.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT AN ORIGINAL WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED OCTOBER 14, 2008 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 6.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMWATER PLAN DATED. 7.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on January 27, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation (Dosewallips River), Shoreline Slope Stability Mapping- modified, intermediate, stable and unstable, Stream types- S, F and N, Blue Heron habitat area, eagle habitat area (outside of project area), elk and Harlequin Duck, wetlands, seismic hazard area, frequently flooded area, susceptible aquifer recharge area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ), Channel Migration Zones- High Risk and Disconnected. 8.) Washington State Parks submitted a geotechnical report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences dated October 14, 2008 and an addendum to the report dated January 29, 2009 to address the geologically hazardous areas mapped in the project area. Section 15 of this report (Page 14) states, "Assuming the recommendation provided in this report are followed, it is our opinion that the proposed project will adequately protect the public safety." This permit has been conditioned to require compliance with the geotechnical report and the addendum. 9.) Washington State Parks submitted a Wetland Investigation for the Proposed Welcome Center and Convenience Cabins dated February 26, 2008 - Updated August 21, 2008 to address the wetlands mapped near the project area. Based on the report and correspondence with State Park staff, the nearest wetland appears to be approximately 450 ft. from the project area. This exceeds the maximum buffer width of 350 ft for an non-delineated Category 1 wetland. Staff determined no further investigation or information is required. 10.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. 11.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 12.) Construction Materials and Methods of Construction to Reduce Flood Hazard (i)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. (ii) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. (iii) Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Locating such equipment below the base flood elevation may cause annual flood insurance premiums to be increased. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 9 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 13.) Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibited unless designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following criteria: a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. c. Openings may be equipt with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater. 14.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in 15.15.080(c) of Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15) which states: (i)All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; (ii)Water wells shall be located on high ground that is not in the floodway; (iii) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters; (iv) Onsite waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. 15.) 1) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. 2) All manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement, and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the top or frame ties to ground anchors. 16.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 17.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 18.) Geologically HazardousAreas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 19.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500) feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 20.) A Type S, F and N Streams (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) have been identified on the subject property. The streams will require a buffer of 150-feet from the S, 150-feet from the F and 75 from the N. The buffers shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 21.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 22.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), Pacific Willow (Salix lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Salix scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium). \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 10 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 23.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 24.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone)according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 25.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 26.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 27.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 28.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 29.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (Type S, F and N Streams), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 150, 150 and 74 feet respectively. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)to the Welcome Center. 30.) An additional setback of five (5) feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed Welcome Center. 31.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 32.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 33.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 34.) An engineered plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the engineer of record to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department receives an original "wet stamped" letter from the engineer of record verifying plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 11 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 35.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on November 13, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated March 5, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 36.) This approval is for a Welcome Center at Dosewallips State Park only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 37.) The parcel has been designated as PPR (Parks, Preserves, and Recreation) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 38.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 39.) Setback from Hwy 101 right-of-way is no less than 50 ft., side and rear setbacks are no less than 20 ft. If an environmentally sensitive area(ESA) is present, then the more restrictive setback shall apply. 40.) Exterior lighting for commercial and industrial uses shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 41.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 42.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 10%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 43.) The proposal meets the performance standards found in JCC 18.20.290. 44.) The applicant shall comply with the landscaping plan as submitted with the application and stamped approved on March 5, 2009. 45.) Parking for physically handicapped needs shall be provided consistent with state standards at a rate of not less than two percent of the total number of parking spaces, or a minimum of one parking space, whichever is greater. Parking spaces for physically handicapped needs shall comply with ANSI 117.1-2003 (502.2 and 502.4.2). Such spaces shall be not less than 12 feet, six inches wide. 46.) All required off-street parking shall be provided with an all-weather surface as required by the Jefferson County department of public works. 47.) Wheel stops, striping, or similar measures are required for parking spaces. 48.) Existing vegetation meets the landscaping requirements. 49.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 50.) The proposed development is outside of shoreline jurisdiction. 1\tidemark)data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 12 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type PRJ08-00137 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F P Application Received: 11/20/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP09-00001 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F I A Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 1/13/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/27/2009 Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARK-holding tank for new visitors center info for RV dump station and drainfield filed to SEP80-295 1.) This permit was issued as part of a waiver to WAC 246-272A-0240. The holding tank permited here must be connected to a permitted OSS by June 2010 2.) H -This holding tank must be converted to a regular septic tank and connected to the park wide OSS by June 2010. If the park wide OSS is not complete by June 2010 then a new OSS permitted by this office to serve the visitors center will be required. 3.) H - AS PER WAC 246-272AAND JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 ALL SEPTIC SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS SEWAGE SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE MONITORING ON A WEEKLY BASIS. MONITORING REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY. 4.) H - This holding tank requires routine pumping and must be pumped by a Jefferson County licensed pumper. 5.) This system must be constructed by an installer certified by the Jefferson County Public Health Department per state code WAC246-272A-0250. 6.) Designer must be contacted prior to start of construction and for inspections during installation. DESIGNER IS REQUIRED TO DO A PRECOVER INSPECTION ON ALL TYPES OF SYSTEMS. 7.) Notification of the start of construction shall be faxed or emailed to Jefferson County Public Health ONE WORKING DAY prior to start. 8.) H -An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the Designer is required prior to final approval. 9.) 10' separation required between a Water line and all portions of the onsite sewage system; effluent transport line, tanks, treatment and disposal components. 10.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 11.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 12.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 13.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over both compartments and over the outlet of the septic tank for inspection and maintenance/monitoring. Minimum 20" riser over inlet. 14.) This site has been granted a waiver from the state onsite sewage regulation 246-272A-240 Compliance with conditions of the waiver is required. 15.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 16.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the holding tank prior to covering. 17.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. A high water float with an audio visual alarm shall be provided. The alarm shall be located within view of the holding tank in a watertight enclosure and approved by the State Electrical Inspector. 18.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 19.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County staff for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: (list here). 20.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 21.) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters 22.) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. BLD09-00099 MLA09-00109 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F I F Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 4/1/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/20/2009 Case Finaled: 7/29/2009 3 SETS OF STEPS FOR PARKMODEL HOMES &ADA RAMP FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 13 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) JCC 15.15.050 definition: "Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle: (1) Built on a single chassis; (2) Four hundred square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection; (3) Designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck; and (4) Designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. 2.) Recreational vehicles placed on sites are required to either: (i) Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days; or (ii) Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, on wheels or jacking system, attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and have no permanently attached additions; or (iii) Meet the requirements of subsection (2)(c) of JCC 15.15.080 and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes. 3.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 16, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation(Dosewallips River), Shoreline Slope Stability Mapping - modified, intermediate, stable and unstable, Stream types-S, F and N, Blue Heron habitat area, eagle habitat area(outside of project area), elk and Harlequin Duck, wetlands, seismic hazard area, frequently flooded area, susceptible aquifer recharge area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone(SIPZ), Channel Migration Zones - High Risk and Disconnected. 4.) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. 5.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 6.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. 7.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on April 1, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 16, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8.) This approval is for a steps to park models and ADA ramp in the Dosewallips State Park only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 9.) The proposed steps and ramp are in an existing camp ground of the Dosewallips State Park. The subject sites are surrounded by an existing driveway. Per JCC 18.22.095 the administrator has determined the proposal is excluded from critical area buffers due to physical separation and functional isolation created by the existing impervious surface of the camping areas and the driveway. 10.) The parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserve and Recreation under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 14 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 11.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. SDP09-00033 MLA09-00129 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT P I A David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 4/17/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/22/2009 Case Finaled: Streamlined Fish Enhancement Projects - Dosewallips River- Removal of levee/berm and revegetate floodplain. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 22, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation; Shoreline Stream Type; Salmon, Waterfowl, Harbor Seal habitat; Wetlands; Seismic Zone; Flood Zone; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) A Type"S" Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a buffer of 150-feet. The buffer shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. If approved by State Agencies, the proposal will be exempt from the buffer requirements. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects,which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 15 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 8.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Streamlined Fish Habitat Enhancement Project application on April 13, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 22, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a Streamlined fish enhancement project to remove a levee and revegetate a floodplain only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 12.) RCW 77.55.290(4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County. 13.) Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290, which states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. PRJ10-00141 MLA10-00139 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DOT P Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI t PARKS WATER SYSTEM No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SDP10-00048 MLA10-00139 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS Ill A David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 4/14/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/14/2010 Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI t PARKS WASTE WATER SYSTEM -The Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission plans to replace the existing wastewater treatment system as part of the State of Washington Clean Water Initiative. Waste water at the Dosewallips State Park is currently treated in eleven septic tank/drainfield systems. Much of the Park is within a floodplain and subject to seasonally high groundwater. Subsequently, Hood Canal water quality may be negatively impacted. The initial construction will include an on-site collection system at the Park, conveyance through subsurface pipe and construction of a treatment/disposal system on the 20 acre former Jorgensen property on Church Road. The treatment system will utilize waste water treatment processes capable of producing "Class A" reusable water. The selected system will have little or no odor and noise. The treatment facility will be enclosed within a walled and roofed structure to further reduce any potential for noise and odor impacts. Given the size and current heavily forested condition of the property, it is anticipated that adjacent property owners will not be subjected to any visual, noise or odor impacts. The treatment facility property is currently zoned Rural Residential 1:5 and it is anticipated that the facility will have less impact on noise, odor, existing vegetation and traffic than if it was developed into five acre residential parcels. This project requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Conditional Use Permit for a utility in a Conservancy Shoreline Designation, a Type II Conditional Administrative"C(a)" Use Permit for a Minor Utility in the Parks & Recreation and Rural Village Center zones, and a Type II Conditional Discretionary"C(d)" Use Permit for a wastewater treatment facility in a Rural Residential Zone. These permits will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2), requiring a Hearing Examiner's Decision. A final SEPA determination issued by State Parks acting as lead agency, a Hydraulic Project Approval issued by Fish&Wildlife, and final shoreline approval by the Department of Ecology are also required. A public hearing will be scheduled and noticed after the end of the 30 day shoreline comment period. 1.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. 11tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 16 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 2.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. The applicant shall convey to Jefferson County in fee simple a right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work, whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha ZON10-00052 MLA10-00139 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS III A David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/14/2010 Case Finaled: CONDITIONAL DISCHE I(UNARY"C(d)" USE for a wastewater treatment facility in a rural residential zone. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP10-00048. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 17 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. Th e applicant shall convey to Jefferson Coun ty in f ee simple right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work, whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha 2.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner's Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. BLD10-00379 MLA10-00139* WASHINGTON STATE PARKS I A David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 11/4/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/3;2011 Case Finaled: STORMWATER PERM!f - for Phase I collection system within the Park \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 18 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) See MLA10-00139 for SDP approval and findings. 2.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 3.) The applicant is proposing to create or add zero square feet of impervious surface and 15,000 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require the project applicant submit a stormwater plan meeting Minimum Requirements #1 through #5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The stormwater plan shall address measures to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction and shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) A Stormwater Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 5.) The site plan as submitted with the Stormwater Management Permit application on November 4, 2010 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 5, 2010 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 6.) This approval is for a Stormwater Management for in-Park sewage collection system only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 7.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ZON10-00051 MLA10-00139* WASHINGTON STATE PARKS III A David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/4/2010 Case Finaled: CONDITIONAL ADMINISTRA I IVE. USE "C(a)" for a minor utility (sewer lines) in the Parks & Recreation and Rural Village Center zones. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP10-00048. \\tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 19 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 1.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. The applicant shall convey to Jefferson County in fee simple a right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work, whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha 2.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. BLD14-00044 MLA14-00011 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR P Application Received: 2/6/2014 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construct 50 ft wide flood plain and 1270 ft long channel \\tidemark\data\forms\R MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 20 of 23 Cases Name Review Status P lanner Type No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ14-00008 MLA14-00011 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR P Application Received: 2/6/2014 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construst 50 ft wid flood plain and 1270 ft long channel No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE08-00027 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS & M Zoe Ann Lamp Application Received: 6/18/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/29/2008 Case Finaled: Washinton State Parks proposes to install three convenience cabins in the higher elevations of the existing campground and a Welcome Center. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE08-00042 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 11/20/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/14/2009 Case Finaled: Installation of a sewer collection system within Dosewallips State Park for tuture connection to a waste water treatment facility. The treatment facility will not be located within the park boundary. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE13-00016 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR M Donna Frostholm Application Received: 6/18/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/2/2013 Case Finaled: TWANA CREEK RESORAI ION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR00-00478 WA ST PARKS & RECREATION F Application Received: 11/1/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 1/14/2002 Vault Toilet No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM00-00248 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 5./7/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARK- serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP01-00140 WA ST PARKS & RECREATION C Application Received: 8/10/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/26/2002 Case Finaled: Dosewallips State Park. System Designed for RV waste only case sent to archive 6/10/2013 1.) Crossing of water and sewer lines shall be avoided. If absolutly unavoidable the crossing and materials used shall conform to the "Criteria for Sewage Works Design, dated December 1998" The ends of the encased pipe must be inspected by the health department. Grouting and type of material used must be visible!! 2.) Permanent barriers are required along/around the Recirculating Gravel Filter and the primary drainfield area 3.) Existing septic system and tanks shall be properly abandoned. Tanks shall be pumped and removed to a licensed disposal facility per approved design. Documentation to be provided to Health Dept. prior to final. The system does not meet code and can not be used again in the future. 4.) An O&M mannual is required prior to final 5.) Water usage monitoring shall be conducted daily for the first two months &weekly thereafter for the first year. These monitoring results shall be submitted to the Jefferson County Health Dept. no less than quarterly. 6.) Waste Strength (BOD, TSS, Grease and oils) may be required if there is a change of use , food service addition or at the request of the Jefferson County Health Department. Responsibility is that of the owner. 7.) As per Jefferson County Code 8.15 all onsite sewage systems require monitoring. Monitoring shall be provided by an approved entity. THIS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED EVERY YEAR or more frequently as required in the O&M mannual. 8.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 9.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test when system fully installed/complete, 48 hours notice to be provided for scheduling. 10.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 11.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 12.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 13.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 21 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 14.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 15.) The portion of transport line under the driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 16.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 17.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. SEP05-00105 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 4/12/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/10/2005 Case Finaled: 1/22/2007 DOSEWALLIPS STA1 t PARK-VAULT TOILET-western most on west side of 101 1.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the Designer or installer is required prior to final approval. 2.) Existing tank shall be properly abandoned. It shall be pumped and filled with clean fill or removed and disposed of in a liecensed landfill. Documentation to be provided to Health Dept. prior to final. 3.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. 4.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from vault area. 5.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 6.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the vault. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. SOM05-00105 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 1/22/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP75-00496 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 10/2/1975 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/7/1975 Case Finaled: 10/7/1975 filed to SEP79-288. Dosewallips State Park Ranger Residence -Wo017777 ¶01 at south end of park No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00187 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00288 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 5/17/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/17/1979 Case Finaled: 5/17/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 info from SEP75-496 filed here No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM79-00288 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00186 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI t PARK- serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00289 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 7/13/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/13/1979 Case Finaled: 7/13/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort station WoofHWY 101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM79-00289 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAlE PARK- serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 22 of 23 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type PRJ12-00010 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00290 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 6/6/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/11/1979 Case Finaled: 6/11/1979 serves sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM79-00290 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves sp 71-80, west of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ12-00009 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP80-00295 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 2/27/1980 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/2/1979 Case Finaled: 11/2/1979 serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM80-00295 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves the RV dump station on west side of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00185 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STALE PARK- serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP81-00204 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 4/14/1981 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/23/1981 Case Finaled: 9/1/2011 DOSEWALLIPS STAI SHARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM81-00204 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Dosewallips state park, serves camp circle sp 31-40, to NE of south comfort station. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM11-01072 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F NFD Application Received: 12/28/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Sanitary Survey only, no permit records located. Serves public bathrooms East of HWY 101 and south of Dosewallips River No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT Parcel_Cond.rpt 2/10/2014 Page 23 of 23 I `' CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 502021001 Printed: June 24, 2013 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner BLD94-00806 WA ST PARKS & RECREATION F Application Received: 11/18/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/21/1994 Case Finaled: 4/16/1997 wildlife viewing platform No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP00-00248 WA ST PARKS& RECREATION F Application Received: 11/1/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/13/2002 Case Finaled: 5/7/2002 DOSEWALLIPS STATE NARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River 1.) Per the letter dated 10-31-01 from the State Parks & Recreation Commission the Vault shall be pumped dry prior to November 1st of each year and the east campground closed from November thru March of each year. This is being done as a mittigative factor allowing the Vault toilet to be installed in a flood plain. 2.) Vault setback to all public wells is 100'. 50' required from the river 3.) Divert all sources of drainage away from the vault area. 4.) Vault to be mono pour and water tight. 5.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 6.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. FPA2612055 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 10/17/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/26/2012 Case Finaled: 10/29/2012 10-acre uneven-aged salvage timber harvest. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD01-00516 MLA01-00481 STATE OF WASHINGTON PARK, I F K RUSSELL Application Received: 9/12/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 12/12/2001 Case Finaled: 6/18/2002 VAULT TOILET 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 9/4/01 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Floodplain, and Type I Stream. 2.) All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage. 3.) All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b. be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 4.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95. 5.) Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note: Landfills are not permitted in the floodway.)The placement of fill may be utilized to elevate the structure and must comply with the standards and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable. b. Pole, pier or piling construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be used to allow the unrestricted flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one foot above the base flood level. c. Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and constructed to provide open spaces through which water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation walls and basements are not permitted in the floodway.)The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed on foundation walls that extend above grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential construction complies with the requirment of Section 5.101(2), "Residential Construction," regarding the design of enclosed areas. \\tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.ret 6/24/2013 Page 1 of 23 'r Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 6.) A Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant was drafted for the septic and building permit. The Agreement outlines provisions for the placement of the vault toilet facility. In addition, The Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (Ordinance No. 18-1120-95) identifies the responsibilities of the official. Such responsibilities include: -Make interpretations where necessary and where possibleas to the exact location of boundaries of the areas of flood hazard. -In the absence of detailed base flood elevation data sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this ordinance, the administrator shall obtain and consider the necessary information from federal, state, or other sources, to ensure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness may include use of historical data, high water marks, and photographs of past flooding. Where deemed necessary, a determination by a professional engineer or surveyor may be required. 7.) A mitigation plan was proposed by the Washington Department of Parks and Recreation which includes the following: 1. The applicant shall use the CXT Incorporated toilet facility. 2. The toilet must be closed and locked from November to March. 3. Prior to the toilet closure the facility must be pumped annually by October 31. 8.) The toilet facility must be pumped annually by October 31st. Following pumping of the facility it must be shut and locked for the entire flood season (November- February). The facility can reopen in March. 9.) A Type 1 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a setback of 150-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 10.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 11.) An additional setback of five (5) feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed vault toilet facility. 12.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 354 square feet of impervious surface. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal adhere to Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control sediment and erosion on the subject property. 13.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 14.) The site plan as submitted with the building/septic application on September 4, 2001 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 11/28/01 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 15.) The applicant has recorded the Hold Harmless Agreement which is available at the Jefferson County Auditors Office filed 11/27/01. SDP04-00022 MLA04-00356 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS Al I F K RUSSELL Application Received: 6/17/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/12/2004 Case Finaled: Dosewallips State Parks Estuary Restoration Project The proposal is to remove an existing dilapidated fence that has been damaged by the elements. The proposal has already undergone SEPA review, with Washington State Parks acting as the lead agency. A threshold determination of non-significance was issued om June 8, 2004. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 6/23/04 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline (Conservancy), Type I Steam, and Wetlands. 2.) This proposal is to conduct in water work to remove a dilapated fence. The fence was originally installed to protect shellfish from predation. The fence is not longer functioning and Washington State Parks is requesting to remove the fence. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)for this activity under Log Number ST-61842-01. The HPA expires on 7/109. 5.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 7.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation acting as lead agency. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)was issued on July 1, 2004.. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 2 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 8.) The site plan as submitted with the shoreliine application on 6/10/04 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 7/12/04 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 9.) This approval is for the extraction of a fence only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 10.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 3.402.6 and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 11.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 12.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. SDP04-00033 MLA04-00475 WASHINGTON TROUT I F G BALLARD Application Received: 7/30/2004 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/11/2004 Case Finaled: A Fish Habitat Enhancement Project of the removal of a dike from a 10 acre salt water marsh located within the boundaries of the Dosewallips State Park. The purpose of the proposal is to improve the function of the Dosewallips River by allowing the river to meander within the salt water marsh. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on August 4, 2004 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 1 Shoreline (Natural), wetlands, wildlife (heritage & PHS), 100 year floodplain, seismic, aquifer recharge areas, SIPZ, and stormwater. 2.) RCW 77.55.290(4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. 3.) This proposal has qualified for the streamlined process for Fish Habitat and Enhancement (RCW 77.55.290) projects as indicated by a letter from the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife dated June 17, 2004. The legislature has found that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects to be consistent with the Shoreline Management Act. This project is sponsored by Washington Trout. 4.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 5.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife has determined this proposal qualifies as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project (see letter dated June 17, 2004), and will issued a streamline Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA). 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects,which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 8.) The approximate 500 cubic yards of excavated material should be disposed at an approved upland location outside of the shoreline jurisdiction and the 100 year floodplain. 9.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). 10.) The site plan as submitted with the Shoreline Exemption application (SDP 04-33) on July 30, 2004 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated August 4, 2004 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 11.) This approval is for activities associated with the removal of a dike a only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. BLD05-00345 MLA05-00327 NORDLAH 1 F M FARFAN Application Received: 5/27/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/18/2005 Case Finaled: 3/15/2007 REPLACE VAULT TOILET BLDG W/NEW BLDG - BIGGER FOOTPRINT,— SAME PLACE- DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 3 of 23 T , Y Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on June 30, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Type 3 &5 stream; eagle, elk, harlequin duck, & blue heron; seismic; flood; SUSC aquifer recharge area; coastal SIPZ. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) All new construction shall use construction methods which minimize flood damage. 5.) All new construction shall: a. be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the sturcture. b. be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage and potential damage to adjacent properties. c. be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. d. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. e. electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, air-conditioning equipment, and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 6.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in Section 5.20 of Ordinance No. 18-1120-95. 7.) Flood proofing of structures shall be provided by one or more of the following methods: a. Landfill: (Note: Landfills are not permitted in the floodway.) The placement of fill may be utilized to elevate the structure and must comply with the standards and policies of the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program, if applicable. b. Pole, pier or piling construction: The use of poles, piers, or piles for the foundation of the structure may be used to allow the unrestricted flow of flood waters during periods at a base flood. The lowest floor must be one foot above the base flood level. c. Parallel Foundation Walls: Foundation walls may be designed and constructed to provide open spaces through which water can flow unrestricted to equalize pressure. In velocity flood situations, it is important that all foundation walls be parallel to the flow of the floodwaters. d. Extended Foundation Walls and Basements: (Note: Extended foundation walls and basements are not permitted in the floodway.)The lowest habitable floor of a residence may be constructed on foundation walls that extend above grade to one foot above the height of the base flood provided that residential construction complies with the requirment of Section 5.101(2), "Residential Construction," regarding the design of enclosed areas. 8.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 9.) A Type 3 & 5 Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) has been identified on the portion of the property that will site the toilet. The streams will require a setback of 100-feet for the Type 3 and 50-feet for the Type 5. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 10.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 11.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple(Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry (Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus Garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow (Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(AmalanchierAlnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera) Sala! (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa Pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(SymphoricarposAlbus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 12.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 1\tidemarkddata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 4 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 13.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 14.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 15.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 3 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 100 feet. The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 5 Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 50 feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM) to the proposed replacement of the vault toilet. 16.) An additional setback of five (5) feet is required from the edge of the stream buffer areas to the proposed vault toilet. 17.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the stream buffer areas shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 18.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 19.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 20.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL &AT RISK SIPZ: t Installation of a flow meter. 2. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 3. Submittal of monitoring data to County. 21.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 22.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 23.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 272 square feet of impervious surface and 168 square feet of land disturbing activities. 24.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 25.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 26.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on May 27, 2005 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated June 30, 2005 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 27.) This approval is to replace a vault toilet building with a new building only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 28.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 15%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. \\tidemark\data\forms\R MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 5 of 23 Cases Name Review Tyne Status Planner 29.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 30.) Minimum setback from Highway 101 shall be 50 feet. Minimum side and rear setbacks shall be 20 feet. If an ESA is present, then the more stricter setback shall apply. 31.) Exterior lighting for commercial and industrial uses shall not exceed thirty feet(30') in height from the finished grade. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 32.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 33.) The toilet facility must be pumped annually by October 31st. Following pumping of the facility it must be shut and locked for the entire flood season (November- February). The facility can reopen in March. SDP06-00023 MLA06-00353 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT P I F D JOHNSON Application Received: 6/26/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/30/2006 Case Finaled: Streamlined Fish habitat enhancement project - remove a portion of a levee and install six engineered log jams 1.) The proposal is to enhance fish habitat by removing a portion of a levee and installing six engineered log jams in the lower Dosewallips river. 2.) RCW 77.55.290 (4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a streamline Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County. Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects,which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. The site plan and JARPA as submitted (SDP06-00023)on June 26, 2006 has been reviewed by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the approved site plan and JARPA dated June 30, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code (Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 5.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 6.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. SDP07-00001 MLA07-00005 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY I A Z LAMP Application Received: 1/9/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/13/2007 Case Finaled: Install and maintain a real-time stream gage on the Dosewallips River. \\tidemark/data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 6 of 23 1 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on February 12, 2007 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Shoreline Designation -Conservancy, Stable and Modified Shoreline Slope Stability, Type 1 Stream, Great Blue Heron, Harlequin Ducks, Wintering Waterfowl, Swans, Wetlands, Seismic Hazard Area, Frequently Flooded Area, Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ). 2.) The administrator has granted a general exception as allowed in JCC 18.15.205. 3.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 5.) The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife issued Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)for this activity on March 13, 2002 under Log Number 00-F1205-01. The HPA expires on March 20, 2007. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206) 764-3495, for more information. 7.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(2)(i). 9.) The revised site plan as submitted on February 2, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated February 13, 2007 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a stream gage only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development at (360)379-4450 forty-eight (48) hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow monitoring and ensure compliance with permit conditions. 12.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program JCC 18.25.090(19) and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit (SDP) requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 13.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 14.) No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. SDP07-00035 MLA07-00241 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I A Application Received: 5/11/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/31/2008 Case Finaled: APPROVED FOR EX I ENSION -Lower Dosewallips Fish Enhancement and Restoration Project 1.) Based upon information provided in the JARPA, this project meets the requirements for the Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval process for Streamlined Fish Habitat Enhancement un RCW 77.55.181. Should WDFW determine that the project does not meet the streamlined exemption criteria, full permiting will be required. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcei_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 7 of 23 , • Cases Name Review Tyne Status Planner 2.) The proposal will restore and enhance fish habitat to the Lower Dosewallips River and upper estuary by placing and arranging large trees into the river within proximity of the Dosewallips State Park. RCW 77.55.290 (4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. This project is sponsored by Jefferson County Conservation District. Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290 that states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. 3.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 4.) This approval is for a Shoreline Exemption for a Streamlined Fish Enhancement Process only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 5.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Fish Enhancement Shoreline Exemption application on May 11, 2007 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated May 22, 2007 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. BLD08-00486 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I F Application Received: 11/13/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/2/2009 Case Finaled: 7/13/2009 DEMO EXISTING WELCOME CENTER AT DOSEWALLIPS STATE-PARR- 1.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. BLD08-00487 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I I Application Received: 11/13/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/9/2009 Case Finaled: NEW WELCOME CENTER Al DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK(replaces old) FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1.) This building is approved based on the understanding that the plumbing will be connected to the new off site park septic system by June of 2010 or a new on site septic system permitted and installed to handle the sewage waste from this building. 2.) Failure to elevate at least two feet above the highest adjacent grade may result in higher flood insurance rates. 1ltidemarkldatalforms\R_MLT Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 8 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 3.) Doug Mackey, State Parks, supplied the following information in an e-mail to staff dated 2/2/2009: "The Welcome Center floor will be built on a slab at an elevation of 25' 6." The edge of the 100-year flood aligned with the historic direction of flow during floods is 215 feet to the east of the building site. The edge of the 500-year flood in this same alignment is 300 feet to the west. The survey provided by Mr. Butler's company shows the construction site elevation is much closer to the 500-year flood level, see the FloodPlain-FEMA.pdf map. Given its elevation, approximately five feet above the near-by 100-year flood level, the proposed construction will be at least reasonably safe from flooding." On February 25, 2009, based on the above information and the flood elevation certificate, the Administrator determined the Welcome Center is reasonably safe from flooding [JCC 15.15.080(1)(e)]. 4.) Construction and site development of the new Welcome Center must comply with all recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences dated October 14, 2008 and the subsequent letter from Associated Earth Sciences dated January 29, 2009. 5.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT AN ORIGINAL WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED OCTOBER 14, 2008 STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 6.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMWATER PLAN DATED. 7.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on January 27, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation (Dosewallips River), Shoreline Slope Stability Mapping - modified, intermediate, stable and unstable, Stream types-S, F and N, Blue Heron habitat area, eagle habitat area (outside of project area), elk and Harlequin Duck, wetlands, seismic hazard area, frequently flooded area, susceptible aquifer recharge area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ), Channel Migration Zones- High Risk and Disconnected. 8.) Washington State Parks submitted a geotechnical report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences dated October 14, 2008 and an addendum to the report dated January 29, 2009 to address the geologically hazardous areas mapped in the project area. Section 15 of this report(Page 14) states, "Assuming the recommendation provided in this report are followed, it is our opinion that the proposed project will adequately protect the public safety." This permit has been conditioned to require compliance with the geotechnical report and the addendum. 9.) Washington State Parks submitted a Wetland Investigation for the Proposed Welcome Center and Convenience Cabins dated February 26, 2008 - Updated August 21, 2008 to address the wetlands mapped near the project area. Based on the report and correspondence with State Park staff, the nearest wetland appears to be approximately 450 ft. from the project area. This exceeds the maximum buffer width of 350 ft for an non-delineated Category 1 wetland. Staff determined no further investigation or information is required. 10.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. 11.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 12.) Construction Materials and Methods of Construction to Reduce Flood Hazard (i)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. (ii)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. (iii) Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Locating such equipment below the base flood elevation may cause annual flood insurance premiums to be increased. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 9 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 13.) Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibited unless designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following criteria: a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. c. Openings may be equipt with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater. 14.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in 15.15.080(c) of Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15)which states: (i)All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; (ii)Water wells shall be located on high ground that is not in the floodway; (iii) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters; (iv) Onsite waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. 15.) 1) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. 2) All manufactured homes shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement, and shall be installed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Anchoring methods may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the top or frame ties to ground anchors. 16.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 17.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 18.) Geologically HazardousAreas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 19.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred(500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 20.) A Type S, F and N Streams (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) have been identified on the subject property. The streams will require a buffer of 150-feet from the S, 150-feet from the F and 75 from the N. The buffers shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 21.) Stream buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 22.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis), Shore Pine(Pinus contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes:Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), Pacific Willow (Salix lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Salix scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry (Amalanchier alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark (Physocarpus capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus racemosa), Snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium). \\tidemark\datalforms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 10 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 23.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 24.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 25.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 26.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL&AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three(3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 27.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 28.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the stream buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 29.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas (Type S, F and N Streams), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 150, 150 and 74 feet respectively. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) to the Welcome Center. 30.) An additional setback of five (5) feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed Welcome Center. 31.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 32.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 33.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 34.) An engineered plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the engineer of record to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department receives an original "wet stamped" letter from the engineer of record verifying plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 11 of 23 • Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 35.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on November 13, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated March 5, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 36.) This approval is for a Welcome Center at Dosewallips State Park only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 37.) The parcel has been designated as PPR (Parks, Preserves, and Recreation) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 38.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 39.) Setback from Hwy 101 right-of-way is no less than 50 ft., side and rear setbacks are no less than 20 ft. If an environmentally sensitive area (ESA) is present, then the more restrictive setback shall apply. 40.) Exterior lighting for commercial and industrial uses shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 41.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 42.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 10%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 43.) The proposal meets the performance standards found in JCC 18.20.290. 44.) The applicant shall comply with the landscaping plan as submitted with the application and stamped approved on March 5, 2009. 45.) Parking for physically handicapped needs shall be provided consistent with state standards at a rate of not less than two percent of the total number of parking spaces, or a minimum of one parking space, whichever is greater. Parking spaces for physically handicapped needs shall comply with ANSI 117.1-2003 (502.2 and 502.4.2). Such spaces shall be not less than 12 feet, six inches wide. 46.) All required off-street parking shall be provided with an all-weather surface as required by the Jefferson County department of public works. 47.) Wheel stops, striping, or similar measures are required for parking spaces. 48.) Existing vegetation meets the landscaping requirements. 49.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 50.) The proposed development is outside of shoreline jurisdiction. PRJ08-00137 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT 17 P Application Received: 11/20/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: \\tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 12 of 23 - Cases Name Review Tyne Status Planner No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP09-00001 MLA08-00467 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I A Application Received: 1/13/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/27/2009 Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-holding tank for new visitors center. info for RV dump station and drainfield filed to SEP80-295 1.) This permit was issued as part of a waiver to WAC 246-272A-0240. The holding tank permited here must be connected to a permitted OSS by June 2010 2.) H -This holding tank must be converted to a regular septic tank and connected to the park wide OSS by June 2010. If the park wide OSS is not complete by June 2010 then a new OSS permitted by this office to serve the visitors center will be required. 3.) H - AS PER WAC 246-272AAND JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 ALL SEPTIC SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS SEWAGE SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE MONITORING ON A WEEKLY BASIS. MONITORING REPORTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY. 4.) H - This holding tank requires routine pumping and must be pumped by a Jefferson County licensed pumper. 5.) This system must be constructed by an installer certified by the Jefferson County Public Health Department per state code WAC246-272A-0250. 6.) Designer must be contacted prior to start of construction and for inspections during installation. DESIGNER IS REQUIRED TO DO A PRECOVER INSPECTION ON ALL TYPES OF SYSTEMS. 7.) Notification of the start of construction shall be faxed or emailed to Jefferson County Public Health ONE WORKING DAY prior to start. 8.) H -An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the Designer is required prior to final approval. 9.) 10' separation required between a Water line and all portions of the onsite sewage system; effluent transport line, tanks, treatment and disposal components. 10.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 11.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 12.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 13.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over both compartments and over the outlet of the septic tank for inspection and maintenance/monitoring. Minimum 20" riser over inlet. 14.) This site has been granted a waiver from the state onsite sewage regulation 246-272A-240 Compliance with conditions of the waiver is required. 15.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 16.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the holding tank prior to covering. 17.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. A high water float with an audio visual alarm shall be provided. The alarm shall be located within view of the holding tank in a watertight enclosure and approved by the State Electrical Inspector. 18.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 19.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County staff for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: (list here). 20.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 21.) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters 22.) On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. BLD09-00099 MLA09-00109 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R I F Application Received: 4/1/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/20/2009 Case Finaled: 7/29/2009 3 SETS OF STEPS FOR-PARR-MODEL HOMES &ADA RAMP FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 13 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) JCC 15.15.050 definition: "Recreational vehicle" means a vehicle: (1) Built on a single chassis; (2) Four hundred square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection; (3) Designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck and (4) Designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. 2.) Recreational vehicles placed on sites are required to either: (i) Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days; or (ii) Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, on wheels or jacking system, attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and security devices, and have no permanently attached additions; or (iii) Meet the requirements of subsection (2)(c) of JCC 15.15.080 and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes. 3.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 16, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation (Dosewallips River), Shoreline Slope Stability Mapping -modified, intermediate, stable and unstable, Stream types-S, F and N, Blue Heron habitat area, eagle habitat area (outside of project area), elk and Harlequin Duck, wetlands, seismic hazard area, frequently flooded area, susceptible aquifer recharge area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone(SIPZ), Channel Migration Zones-High Risk and Disconnected. 4.) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure. 5.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 6.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on September 22, 2008. 7.) The site plan as submitted with the building permit application on April 1, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 16, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8.) This approval is for a steps to park models and ADA ramp in the Dosewallips State Park only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 9.) The proposed steps and ramp are in an existing camp ground of the Dosewallips State Park. The subject sites are surrounded by an existing driveway. Per JCC 18.22.095 the administrator has determined the proposal is excluded from critical area buffers due to physical separation and functional isolation created by the existing impervious surface of the camping areas and the driveway. 10.) The parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserve and Recreation under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 1l tidemarl6data1forms\R_MLT_Parcel Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 14 of 23 • Cases_ Name Review Type Status Planner 11.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. SDP09-00033 MLA09-00129 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT P I A Application Received: 4/17/2009 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/22/2009 Case Finaled: Streamlined Fish Enhance Projects - Dosewallips River- Removal of levee/berm and revegetate floodplain. 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on April 22, 2009 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Conservancy Shoreline Designation; Shoreline Stream Type; Salmon, Waterfowl, Harbor Seal habitat; Wetlands; Seismic Zone; Flood Zone; Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Geologically HazardousAreas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 5.) A Type"S" Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a buffer of 150-feet. The buffer shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. If approved by State Agencies, the proposal will be exempt from the buffer requirements. 6.) Prior to commencing development activity, proponent is responsible for informing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) in order for WDFW to determine whether this action is subject to the Washington State Hydraulic Code(Chapter 220-10 WAC). Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is required for all hydraulic projects, which are defined as construction or performance of other work that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any of the salt or fresh waters of the state. 7.) In addition to Jefferson County permit conditions, the project proponent shall comply with all conditions set forth by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife through Hydraulic Project Approval. 8.) Prior to commencing development activity, the proponent is responsible for informing the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) in order for COE to determine whether a Department of the Army permit or review is required. Generally, review is required for construction and dredging in or around navigable waters of the US and for work or fill in hydrologically connected wetlands. Contact the US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch, PO Box 3755, Seattle WA 98124, (206)764-3495, for more information. \\tidemark\datalforms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 15 of 23 . * Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Streamlined Fish Habitat Enhancement Project application on April 13, 2009 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 22, 2009 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a Streamlined fish enhancement project to remove a levee and revegetate a floodplain only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from this Department. 12.) RCW 77.55.290(4) states that local government may not require permits or charge a fee for Fish Habitat Enhancement projects. This serves as Jefferson County's comments on the proposal and also provides a means for Jefferson County to track the proposed activity. Jefferson County has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Code (UDC), and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The State Legislature has determined that Fish Habitat and Enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of the Act have been determined to be consistent with local shoreline master programs. The proposal has been submitted as a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project. If the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that the proposal does not qualify as a Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) by meeting the criteria of a Fish Habitat and Enhancement project (RCW 77.55.290), then a standard HPA will be required and permits may be required by Jefferson County. 13.) Provided that the proposal qualifies as Fish Habitat Enhancement project, this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to RCW 77.55.290, which states that Fish Habitat Enhancement projects are not subject to the requirements of RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). If the proposal does not qualify as a Fish Habitat Enhancement project, the proposal may be subject to SEPA. PRJ10-00141 MLA10-00139 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DOT P Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STA1 E PARKS WATER SYSTEM No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SDP10-00048 MLA10-00139 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS III A Application Received: 4/14/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/14/2010 Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARKS WASTE WATER SYSTEM -The Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission plans to replace the existing wastewater treatment system as part of the State of Washington Clean Water Initiative. Waste water at the Dosewallips State Park is currently treated in eleven septic tank/drainfield systems. Much of the Park is within a floodplain and subject to seasonally high groundwater. Subsequently, Hood Canal water quality may be negatively impacted. The initial construction will include an on-site collection system at the Park, conveyance through subsurface pipe and construction of a treatment/disposal system on the 20 acre former Jorgensen property on Church Road. The treatment system will utilize waste water treatment processes capable of producing "Class A" reusable water. The selected system will have little or no odor and noise. The treatment facility will be enclosed within a walled and roofed structure to further reduce any potential for noise and odor impacts. Given the size and current heavily forested condition of the property, it is anticipated that adjacent property owners will not be subjected to any visual, noise or odor impacts. The treatment facility property is currently zoned Rural Residential 1:5 and it is anticipated that the facility will have less impact on noise, odor, existing vegetation and traffic than if it was developed into five acre residential parcels. This project requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Conditional Use Permit for a utility in a Conservancy Shoreline Designation, a Type II Conditional Administrative"C(a)" Use Permit for a Minor Utility in the Parks& Recreation and Rural Village Center zones, and a Type II Conditional Discretionary"C(d)" Use Permit for a wastewater treatment facility in a Rural Residential Zone. These permits will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2), requiring a Hearing Examiner's Decision. A final SEPA determination issued by State Parks acting as lead agency, a Hydraulic Project Approval issued by Fish&Wildlife, and final shoreline approval by the Department of Ecology are also required. A public hearing will be scheduled and noticed after the end of the 30 day shoreline comment period. 1.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 16 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 2.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. The applicant shall convey to Jefferson County in fee simple a right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work, whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha ZON10-00052 MLA10-00139 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS III A Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/14/2010 Case Finaled: CONDITIONAL DISCRE I(UNARY"C(d)" USE for a wastewater treatment facility in a rural residential zone. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP 10-00048. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 17 of 23 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. The applicant shall convey to Jefferson County in fee simple a right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work, whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha 2.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner's Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. BLD10-00379 MLA10-00139" WASHINGTON STATE PARKS I A Application Received: 11/4/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/3/2011 Case Finaled: STORM WATER PERM! I-for Phase I collection system within the Park 1.) See MLA10-00139 for SDP approval and findings. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 18 of 23 • Cases Name Review Tyne Status Planner 2.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 3.) The applicant is proposing to create or add zero square feet of impervious surface and 15,000 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require the project applicant submit a stormwater plan meeting Minimum Requirements #1 through#5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The stormwater plan shall address measures to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction and shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 4.) A Stormwater Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 5.) The site plan as submitted with the Stormwater Management Permit application on November 4, 2010 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated November 5, 2010 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 6.) This approval is for a Stormwater Management for in-Park sewage collection system only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 7.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ZON10-00051 MLA10-00139* WASHINGTON STATE PARKS III A Application Received: 5/10/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/4/2010 Case Fineled: CONDITIONAL ADMINISTRA IVE USE "C(a)"for a minor utility (sewer lines) in the Parks & Recreation and Rural Village Center zones. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP10-00048. 11tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 19 of 23 I Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) 1. The applicant shall obtain Building Permit from Jefferson County for the structure to house the MBR treatment facility. The application shall address noise containment to meet the standards under JCC 18.30.190. 2. The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Public Works Department, a Stormwater Plan (CSWPPP) that meets the Minimum Requirements #1 -#10 of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, before any land disturbing activities take place. 3. The applicant shall convey to Jefferson County in fee simple a right-of-way that is 30 feet in width from the constructed centerline of Church Road wherever that right-of-way would be located on the proposal site. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County through the Public Works Department. 5. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way use permit from the Public Works Department for construction of effluent lines within County road rights-of-way. 6. The applicant shall acquire a franchise from the State Department of Transportation and Jefferson County for construction of effluent lines in State and County road rights-of-ways. 7. The applicant shall implement design modifications to the utility line installation to meet the standards for flood damage reduction under 15.15.080(1)(c)(ii) " New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharges from the system into flood waters." 8. Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain approval for the State Department of Ecology for an NPDES permit and approval from the State Department of Health for wastewater treatment. 10. The applicant shall meet the standards under JCC 18.30.180 for BMPs in a critical aquifer recharge area either through DOE permitting or meet the standards of 18.30.180 independent of State approval. 11. The applicant shall immediately restore the installation sites to their pre-project condition to the maximum extent possible. 12. New utility distribution lines shall be placed underground wherever reasonable and practical. 13. Utilities and transportation facilities shall be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 14. It shall be the affirmative duty of the applicant who proposes a minor utility development to determine if any state or federal permits or licenses are necessary and then to obtain those permits or licenses at their own expense. 15. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Waters of the state include but are not limited to waters in roadside ditches and storm drains. 16. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 17. Soil in stockpiles should be stabilized or protected with sediment-trapping measures to prevent soil loss. All exposed areas of final grade or areas that are not scheduled for work. whether at final grade or otherwise, shall not remain exposed and un-worked for more than two days, between October 1 and April 30. Between May 1 and September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and un-worked for more than 7 days. 18. Source control best management practices such as plastic covering, mulch, temporary seeding, and pha 2.) See Staff Report dated September 16, 2010 and Hearing Examiner Decision dated October 12, 2010 for findings. PRE08-00027 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS & M Application Received: 618/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/29/2008 Case Finaled: Washinton State Parks proposes to install three convenience cabins in the higher elevations of the existing campground and a Welcome Center. 11tidemarkl data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 20 of 23 J Ca es Name Review Type Status Planner No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE08-00042 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 11/20/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/14/2009 Case Finaled: Installation of a sewer collection system within Dosewallips State Park for future connection to a waste water treatment facility. The treatment facility will not be located within the park boundary. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE13-00016 STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR P Application Received: 6/18/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: TWANA CREEK RESORATION PROJECT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR00-00478 WA ST PARKS & RECREATION F K RUSSELL Application Received: 11/1/2000 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: 1/14/2002 Vault Toilet No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM00-00248 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 5/7/2002 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI t PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP01-00140 WA ST PARKS & RECREATION C Application Received: 8/10/2001 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/26/2002 Case Finaled: Dosewallips State Park. System Designed for RV waste only case sent to archive 6/10/2013 1.) Crossing of water and sewer lines shall be avoided. If absolutly unavoidable the crossing and materials used shall conform to the "Criteria for Sewage Works Design, dated December 1998" The ends of the encased pipe must be inspected by the health department. Grouting and type of material used must be visible!! 2.) Permanent barriers are required along/around the Recirculating Gravel Filter and the primary drainfield area 3.) Existing septic system and tanks shall be properly abandoned. Tanks shall be pumped and removed to a licensed disposal facility per approved design. Documentation to be provided to Health Dept. prior to final. The system does not meet code and can not be used again in the future. 4.) An O&M mannual is required prior to final 5.) Water usage monitoring shall be conducted daily for the first two months &weekly thereafter for the first year. These monitoring results shall be submitted to the Jefferson County Health Dept. no less than quarterly. 6.) Waste Strength (BOD, TSS, Grease and oils) may be required if there is a change of use , food service addition or at the request of the Jefferson County Health Department. Responsibility is that of the owner. 7.) As per Jefferson County Code 8.15 all onsite sewage systems require monitoring. Monitoring shall be provided by an approved entity. THIS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED EVERY YEAR or more frequently as required in the O&M mannual. 8.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 9.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test when system fully installed/complete, 48 hours notice to be provided for scheduling. 10.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 11.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 12.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 13.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 14.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 15.) The portion of transport line under the driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 16.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 17.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. SEP05-00105 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 4/12/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/10/2005 Case Finaled: 1/22/2007 DOSEWALLIPS STAI t PARK-VAULT TOILET-western most on west side of 101 11tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 21 of 23 • • Cafes Name Review Type Status Planner 1.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the Designer or installer is required prior to final approval. 2.) Existing tank shall be properly abandoned. It shall be pumped and filled with clean fill or removed and disposed of in a liecensed landfill. Documentation to be provided to Health Dept. prior to final. 3.) Risers to grade with secured lids shall be located over all compartments. Access ports intended for use as pump-out sites shall be fitted with an impervious pad that slopes towards the access. All pumping and related service must be performed by a Jefferson County licensed septic system pumper. Permit Holder shall maintain and keep operational records which include pumping intervals, sewage volume, disposal site, service and repair records. These records shall be available upon request of the Health officer representative. 4.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from vault area. 5.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 6.) Health Department is to be contacted for a final inspection of the vault. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. SOM05-00105 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 1/22/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP75-00496 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 10/2/1975 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/7/1975 Case Finaled: 10/7/1975 filed to SEP79-288. Dosewallips State Park Ranger Residence-W o WY ¶01 at south end of park No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00187 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00288 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 5/17/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/17/1979 Case Finaled: 5/17/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 info from SEP75-496 filed here No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM79-00288 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAI E PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00186 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAIEPARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00289 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 7/13/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/13/1979 Case Finaled: 7/13/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK- serves southern comfort station W7717777-101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM79-00289 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STAN PARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ12-00010 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves sp 71-80 on west side of I-1M 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP79-00290 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 6/6/1979 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/11/1979 Case Finaled: 6/11/1979 serves sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 22 of 23 r Ca es Name Review Type Status Planner SOM79-00290 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R FIN Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves sp 71-80, west of HWY 101 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ12-00009 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R F Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP80-00295 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 2/27/1980 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/2/1979 Case Finaled: 11/2/1979 serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM80-00295 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R FIN Application Received: 1/13/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: serves the RV dump station on west side of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRJ11-00185 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F F Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: DOSEWALLIPS STA1 E PARK- serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP81-00204 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT E F Application Received: 4/14/1981 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/23/1981 Case Finaled: 9/1/2011 DOSEWALLIPS STA1 E PARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM81-00204 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT F FIN Application Received: 9/1/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Dosewallips state park, serves camp circle sp 31-40, to NE of south comfort station. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM11-01072 STATE OF WASHINGTON-NAT R NFD Application Received: 12/28/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Sanitary Survey only, no perms records located. Serves public bathrooms East of HWY 101 and south of Dosewallips River No findings, conditions, or permissions found. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 6/24/2013 Page 23 of 23 # g Z y [ � , . � (N 6 \2 «! \ , { / � \ \ o / Cl_ 0 ®- __ � \ ! l : : ; ; ) ® g + m 0 # In w - e - ,e m m, §1 -L, « / /»`� ; % ± < % / ® ° jA , \ \ \_ \ \ ( k @ % \ . . 2 11 � 5 ` 0 !. o o' e a , ! ,�``, ' 22 ,a' \ 2%2® ` , ` « � � ` , ° \ ! , �!1 < %; % % zzyx [�; /° | , . // Z\` ° , , ! ~( a 1 / - | \§\y , , \. \ . 2 . - ' ` © $ . w - . • g : IS �` � °/ ` { /� , & ■ ��z / _ ® } - %^ ®® )\ • /§ g // � � ce 0. -2. � ® R2 287» —• § / .„ , zZ - / / / \ \d / / & . /; ( / R® , � \/ - z / Lt \4 x o 0 /j % % ;;. |!E \ % \ \ - , !,/\ \ . ~ P° \ \ NC- « - .v« ® N\ - I?i ] | •o 7 § - : . . \ :/§ \) |� ! —- a!2 }§!\§}.g \� ±8i . j| / -.. \\)§j !!i ,! \ 2 � - / /!}{/) §4 } @ | =;f{!!|! R^ » !- } g ;p4 |f : \§f§§ - \§(!;§|i“8s \ §!§§. r _ ;)!!!!N|! `! : i!3/ 0 ! >d�=§/ /h ° Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map )" LI 11111 .. - - L c. 1 I I I t' I - n)•,.. _ x �MIO� Ilp'yJg R� .� - ' - o I sE 111 ` ---±.... .. T s --_ - N C.. Legend ie. Selected Features 1 , Township Lines ±I JC_Roads InlilliLl ..7.1‘..1:" j Parcels-H Zr MAY'. - d 'N r° 7 I . . 'r'_.—_ .Irma oaf ci Mos Onaatbi MJdiaeoi Casty Cairo Smaees CIS 0mw■MGR FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:32:03 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map L • ,_ ru E i Mil ,\., ski ..J —I s J J ' V � 1 N h ._ w D, 1� Legend DI Selected Features j ►. !f Township Lines Lots yam,le,. -. JC_Roads ; ai Mr I, r Parcels-H f /f.1; & 40 li ,` r _'I.i_1_ .,- 1a c/ )V . / Haas"%.clad J:-:.:•mCO1/.r al l..'a,:.r,....a..Gt5 0 76361i FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:30:23 0013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ° " L mows e Y; welllpsgn� _ , ' ' tor n r _ — r H c VI y' 6 , NL Legend Selected Features i Township Lines L � f JC_Roads �j Parcels-H ,` --. Parcel Tags-H : . . I� No Soocul Raport I 1 ° IN Special Rapon -7 Mat I Air'� / k-di' o oc m A ,w0'.°C' Pik, Nm:5 ceckXl by Ailerons Can.Car.a::.a-.am GIS 0 16364t FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:34:55 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&Cl ientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• l IN MI ,. l 11111:11°*' 1 11 l+ t PITiir ! r t IL�_ •. Rd" " r. \ a ' ' co 5 1111MMFiri e a C7J- . _. Legend �'��'�' ,e. 0 Selected Features !f Township Lines JC_Roads k a Parcels-H ■ Permits-H ` \ ;qn\1101,, D�y. i det 40 rill mill /: Maps aoededey dde•onCantyCe ra Se eons CAS 0■www■twit FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:35:48 +013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 - Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map _ ii e- '( + t U Dnsrwallins Rn = }., o n r.77 L ti :, �� Legend �� I �� .c,3', Selected Features �,.+•,+1. CO 1, rr) ... -._...�___. !d• Township Lines f JC_Roads 1 01 r Parcels-H f A Shoreline Designation-Arc- �``� ton swvancp'Suourean 1 11,' 1i /4/ Con m IF wncyNaural Liman an �� /y♦ Su bu roan ` f },� /stand --- . 1 f • Naomi 4 • Conservancy . n" / % ] , a:' a Nate maw auraan a ... d ? �r e` 1 li I / I 1nn1lP Dr i 1 l? 'nl;lY scandal Jabson CASK/Card's a..<c-Gli 0 • lb■11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:36:22 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map l t _ E ` _ �26NZii 0 se Ywl llins Rn , r.' ti • 2 I /1/4 o k ikdJ .-...r.. - _ W h Legend nd 0 Selected Feat ur es I Township Lines / JC Roads j - l:.l Parcels-H DNR FP Stream ' t Classification . MA/ f•Fish liNsta1 , �� I �1 ^� ..( ! N-Neo-lrsn Ilannal Il lit .4dM,74,„„...4 ZIP. sP No Non-fish Ilatraal•Pomnnul , I Ns.Nan.frsfi Hffinal.3aasonal f 1_`', 3 Inwntorg7$horolma IS lir WI !iii4.1 'Cg t FP �c V C jr, r � Mass paadef JiasnCaaaf Carta Ssnces Gi5 a®=6.3611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:37:08 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 ■ Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map { Th 37 ` L ..v bl N iy r� r a "',+-w r _ a. 5', Legend ■ - 4 ->� , X i Selected Features `��1 Township Lines /1/ +" JC Roads _ ,,�"` - Parcels+) A �f i_. DNR Streams 00/ Type 11 NI°e „Fvf Type 5 Type ii, risf'} t1. {' Tyog2 ti.... ' /�-J a�1 I' `-� � .� fib$ 7 `C e 1 . w-, ,, . , .- ' v,p::ro..derleyadls+mcoenrrddrrSeocesGL; 0 MiliMilli +s3611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:43:121 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. r° r t E. ure4Fi . `N h _;_ N ". Legend -'�- - Selected Features l,` .-\,' -+�� Township Lines i .. JC Roads ((( Parcels-H iiii C DNR Water Bodies 1 . F !,k N �'l MI 5 ''`•",�� ` lil� I I No oggnrpn _ _ {= . al r —1 ;� . \v A - 112 11 A , all wa.v Mss sanded bi Mignon Catty Cata Saws G B FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:43:50 +013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ... ',l ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map r . IMO _ f x i,-, :Oosewallins Rn I lig r / ol 5 _'. t ' l i f l 1 - _ fn � v771 U ;JP a --- ..ti u N )t Legend Selected Features• An j' Township Lines �• w JC_Raads Parcels-H i rg—. ,nf LFAFish 4 t fivriper •Iiw • pii 1/i T,` �c WI's eeiddby JdarsenCary cetrw Straws G4 0■163eft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:44:28 '013 http://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS I-ITML Viewer Map 7 `11c" e1Si � . . �_ L :_r. e 4±._.,_p!. --, fp I . --H' i i 'w. ■ - :� Q?aewa ) ,. y + ' M fps Rtl rti., 14 d. -1 r .._t , II N� I :l- 4j . !(t A_ _ _ _t rr[I:• /rye to P .1/4„,,,,,,,,„ 4 1 { 0 .. .2 U' ...;'N-, Legend Selected Features a. `� �� Township Lines JC Roads XI Parcels-H li Hoc 'T titer.^..T Sails-H l alosil loti r 1 ` . ,�J� k O �a �T" tip` I 4e f " .lu N CI g1 r n ..1�" J �ej I � Mille eanbad by Jde.ecn Conti Ceere Svmcx Gt3 C ,oast, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:44:58 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C lientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map i 11111111111 1111 , L 0' ,7 1 r�r" *; 1,M 11 l/ 9� ._. iii I y 4r, '"` ' anSP welGpa Rn r` 'y t . k c I,• allik 2.p W ,. t., Legend w. n Selected Features EE nsines l, _ . Fie ritage Points . b r. $a - 4 ,e r . o iv m e a + 3yinPaCl i . i , ,--/ Meps aadsl M JdlsamComCairo Sews G6 0 MIII■1IIMIIIIIIM 163611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Jul 22 14:46:091 2013 p,bd- /(-6,a-.. iLV-IR 6illiv-A-tbe- Aid ,utij, 7L-b4/1--- http://gisserver/servlet/com.e sri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 28H2W Dosewellins Rn ce 5 o F r L En C L N 11 &t, !0 Lo h S2 L+ N Legend Selected Features {r Township lanes JC_Roads !� Parcels-41 III n .— Priority Habitats and �` Species 2SN2W a amt S c''' 34 w Man rn-.xd r/Mown CantyCOra Sawnes GIS 0■163611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 15:50:13 2013 • ( e e /(L___ f2__-, 4L-ejel tV------A- http://gisserver/servl et/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. Iu� .. H t•\I ___ __ __ -`-'.• Dn5e1v301n5 Rn .c -; . i al L � Z 1 t* w --La. Legend Selected Features 'Vow. Townsh Lines . Township Roads Parcels-H IIII R Ell wetlands ik' t ii �' Erra vp tir Cam'`/w ' "f / �C rl f0 wo,lta P. / Mega weraded W Jrla+sn YCee'rd Solaces Gli 0 t636n FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:16:59 2013 http://gi s server/servlet/c om.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1-, i t `, ., I / 771 9 ,,i ,...4,Cbse wallies Rn _—ti r\ d S r fr JL .0 n n N .> 1 , L' N Legend Selected Features !/ Township Lines Oft "4f JC_Roads 't Parcels-H ,' fir*•. Seismic Hazard e o .�d� r �' r -El ( use Mats va+ded by Jae rsof Can,.Caring Serous CIS 0•i&aen FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:18:10 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map a `1 Dnswlrps Rn . = `T— "MIA,r:."5 a ___ W w" t 9 b n r • — —**,,411■ -? 3", Legend �,. ca i \ Selected Features Township Lines JC_Raads 14 illii _s Parcelsdi � l,-� I Landslide Hazard yx-�.r� Skies + nph `1 Mo er e SIpn1 Nall t l v v,"sr =Di 414 I a / Ot c. l I C 414m Vwd�d � by Carty Strom,•(.1S Si■I1■IIIIM1676f1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:20:511 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 imirosir it N ,Il - -h lik1720 . . ,,_ . .Ti,. li Mill will 6 jul1/ 666 ,t Legend III Selected Features r Township Lines JC_Roads `., Pa rce Is-H FE MA FIRMS Ellill III af A■ A AN A ■ Omar I 1,11,1 I� f' mrAel 11 � a � �- tx c3. q .- cn :. ,ta rfl -% .-!3 o ro C m MP c im._ w as7rr- r Mips vo.elsihJdaasnCarM Casa&MOOS G6 ■ ■ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Jul 22 16:22:22 013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map �. i� 11.1 I - L �z r— -7G; j — v +. - nsnelin R - �.0 D I �. _ J i 1 t n N" y� 1 I V s , ,h Legend 4 Selected Features IIRP r Township Lines Mk M. y JC_Rwds - Parcels-H I r 7 — • Erosion Hazard 1O- 8 W 't / "Itiotift --3 01.0,13"""i Mags vodad WJrlvmm CanyC * sn,cc:uu' o- 763817 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:22:53 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&Cli entV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 611H, ''sTiliri, c ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map IL . T I t 1 �_— 4 ...`" ---,----- SP.Wa61r;5 Rn �' 1 titi o o'l�r ,mot pry,4 W� — a J N .„.,- w i . -:., Legend r co .,1 Selected Features 111110P • Township dines ti ��i� JC_Roads 5 Parcels-H __aI .3r9:fu ' -` Critical Aquifer Recharge 1+ 'R � Areas Ir � 1 SUSC=UNN `i 131 SARPA.SUSC .. I I suet t .. SARPA I SARPA+UNN - MEW - _ '..--.--b ,s di_ r . Qa....' Sd' c .�P r° r ye.ti CJ v 0C �j' + Nan oru'ded by.MtrsolCavq Cmr9.°Saem Cit4 0■1636ft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- .Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:23:20 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/tom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map }y 1 ' . r / t , -r } 9., 1 f 1 J — ..i' y,. 4 Tit I Legend S �. Selected Features i f Township Lines �����c {.�f JC_Roads 71 Parcels-H ;.� SIPZ f Al Ft MR SIPZ ? ® 110 11'sic SIPZ . 7 w Cetal SIPZ i la I , 'f. i t. J pro-- 2.f 4 r,0 ,A. �24 & r - °° o ey ," lu,trolavg ',1:n:coded try JrMamn Ce& Cdav[Serum GU 0n111■•■•t63611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:26:09 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1 L ,/). �.26N 4 ,Y ' Dnsp wn llir.sRn II { O O T '''wf rn Selected Features „ Township Lines ! JC_Roads 4WAi Shoreline Slope Stability II n u atmnedote _ .. f. i1 7 unstable I r 29l,I'LW' _,.`{ I ■ Unstable Resent landslda 1 y Unstable Old landslide � .i . Med dad i Vr _ .rO a as O` �'_---- _, a° r k ` �r7 v °' { l� -' w Mrr.j cr.-dal nr-d4Ce%.71 Cos'ry Cerra Servers G 3 0-163611 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:24:32 2013 http://gisserver/servl et/com.esri.esri map.Esrimap?Servi ceName=ovmap&C lient V ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ia■ L min . III I i1 1 . DciI1i mallir,R .>- a .2. 'IN,.i'lihr :411:ftli,g';3---' -5,- - '`, 4 r c a m s Legend 0 Selected Features I Township Lines r �--- JC_Roads /1 - 1 Parcels-H Channel Migration Zone i Hazards J' I I Dnoonnalod CMZ MM., HO Risk { \ , 1 II Modwaory Hqn Rise - n Madame 0.ek . t►?: ` Iv Q.a * f� �'•lf f MI - ? _ 1 .1r 1,. o r�„ v off. Maps vadadM J60sv1COMMyCSka; v<ns Gl: 0 1636ft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:25:06 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map -Pti E r t 1 1 1- ' t _._.�--1 —_ .dose wellies Rd —` 11--- Bn Hiroo ti —}� II J _� � N /� Legend! I N y 2i-,t- ' s '-. Selected Features _ '! ` Township Lines , � JC_Roads . '. Parcels-R III No Shooting Zones r '&-.-117.--1. 0 ❑ Bannon I..,.',,.� arm non 6Rrct Point �'i 1�' 1 Bon non-Olymoic Canal T racts i r17i L—Jj Ban non-Triton Cove Chunacum Crank _ — i'' ^yam Nate Pant 6r PMLuckov .� r. b''� e, �r 11� South Coyle Ponmsula / ,. t> O` 4 d• f Pared no Bay ram � C tmacum HadbcR Mextro dedeyJAbaun CaRnry Cerws Ex,vcx-GG Q■1•1•Ml■1636ft FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Jul 22 16:25:45i 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map N e A r {,J — —ir'' zrr as ,,."11111•16•44,,, I r e`nIlin5o l O — . P L � N U �' s rn Legend Selected Features iii f f Township Lines WA!! JC_Rwds Parcels-H e .r. ,. ,,.,L. 744,1 i , \ a 4 o a 1 < I sn1t8 /�s i `A •�.1: 4...:.,...�.�1Cur�YCaMASSLRm� .`.. 0, _.... 1'=7011 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:29:15 2013 http://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map +\ ,`}, o Brin non Ln c `-�-- t� f t -- rn o `- (, o i 6.. v. •�..�; to a , ii \ Legend Selected Features JC Roads t { ir� i Parcels-1•I .}., 11` ` mr. Contours , 10 Foot Contour 4 1 '4 ` }zL { '\' 90 Foot contour.• } S;'a `� '1 w� ) j y �-.1 t 1 , w,y c io i l I rRi r'r�r— ^ � rr( r ro ,: � o' j(I:r!/''' } f // !7 �--. N• I . J I/,-�/�;in"7,f�5 "—') } o1 r jam' J _•_—.—I . '. lc'. 1 I1 Jfa 1 J'r,/r'� { r /f / I -Q,l /er ''s-) i ,# J , , 1� ? I 1 F /I 14:'.so:doi syMle dso 2u.rRy Cava - 5 J f: 1'� 0 MOO=W/11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 14:34:14 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1 § _ s 3A r J x . r / 4� i j ` .- I �A� . - „ 8 r ;' n �, ,. -=-‘,-='------ •.-s-‘41'°,:,--.=__-,,_—_, :.-,...,..-g, — " � � • \,. N Legend #., 00-01,1112O.-1* - Selected Features tTni'� r ti + .a Township Lines JC Roads i� ,.r,,§.F�+�n {`.}. .1 4 .i Parcels-li ? ' •`bl1 :L�.\ S , i s :,L .'a 1 USGS Topes if °T } '�. ` vk . ° l sM . . : 4rinnon I I - pp a7 1 K SAS ° •d.c;::,,...1.J -miCurq Ce'tM S�sw�G� 0■16388 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:28:02 2013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. . FR .. E �/ _ r k �'u. .,� t 11 ., e 1 . ' , f8, 0. I . N 2.' . VIIIIIMrifi �F, .�j 4 y ^ I ti` =. w ' -' w_1-� Legend -=_ , ❑ �! --- Selected Features - J Township Lines .., .,,,,/ JC_Roads „i Parcels-H 1 \i;c ] 2011 Aerial Photos f H L {j> J 4 O / r 1 m r t l 4111"- o rtb Vd . Mar vwaad a,._ee--zvi Cwt,'COT a x.-caa;ts FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Jul 22 16:28:38 013 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 7/22/2013 APN: -'02 Q� OC'l NAME: 'if ta/ J'y P (3 --110 Add.APN VVV Add.APN NOT PPrnted Printed SPAAD Category Intake Req's L ❑ County Zoning ❑ []�, Cases/Conditions by Parcel# ❑ Water Service Area ❑ ❑ Printed from EH map set Plat Maps ❑ ❑ Laserfiche Documents ❑ ❑ Road System "" Leave on for all or most maps Assessor Maps -H ❑ 2` High-light parcel on Map Lots ❑ p' Parcel Tags -H ❑ Permits -H ❑ 2000 Shoreline Photos ❑ ❑ Left/Mid/Right Shoreline Arcs ❑ Q' Shoreline Polygons .10 ❑ DNR FP Stream Class ❑ F'1 DNR Stream ❑ G3 DNR Water Bodies ❑ ❑' , LFA-Fish ❑ ❑`, Soils -H ❑ E' No parcel label Marbled Murrulets E/ ❑ Heritage Points El ❑- Type: Spotted Owls Qr ❑ Bald Eagle Nests &Buffers E ❑ No parcel label Priority Habitats and Species 8/06 ❑ G7 Type Wetlands ❑ {� Rare Plants -Ecosystems LV El Type: Seismic Hazard ❑ E Landslide Hazard ❑ 0 FEMA FIRMS ❑ E, Map Panel#: Erosion Hazard ❑ L�J Critical Aquifer Recharge areas ❑ Cf Wells-Chloride EY 0 No parcel label Mineral Lands Ll' ❑ No parcel label SIPZ ❑ ❑ Shoreline Slope Stability ❑ EY`.. Channel Migration ❑ G7 Airport Overlays 0 ❑, No Shooting Zone ❑ CJ County Zoning -UGA ❑ ❑ LIDAR Hillshade 0, No parcel label-Printed with Countours USGS Topos ❑ E No parcel label 2005 Aerial Photos ❑ E No parcel label Assessor's Info ❑ MLA Number Form ❑ ❑ Pre Application File ❑ ❑ Reviewer Letter Sent ❑ ❑ Eagle 7 Wetland ❑ Eagle Plan Required ❑ ❑ 1 page❑ Habitat Man Plan ❑ ESA Map Checklist 10-13-2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map . Legend Selected Features Township Lines JC_Raads I _ County Zoning L NPR-SF Tracts LJ Rural Ros»em W 1:5 2.1.N-' r� Rural Residential 1.10 75 SP.Wallip3 ROMP' RuralRmsluntel 1 2 NPR Sinew Fmmty ■ NPR-N u 11 eternity WI O J MPR.Resmt Cempws — — '''{��� Pares antl Reereal an N n ■ NPR-Open Sacra • NI m gi Rune Venom Ca.Id.n Forest InaeNmq Forest Wfil. tloays meuslrtnl � Arrpdrt CPf iy �/� ■ NPR Village Cantor It a R' ■ AP 1:20 i ,..., . Rural Vane Center . Resource Based lea i r�tJ11'i Lght Induslral iw 4,',":.,-.:. k NPR-Reaaaten i Warta NRn l CPF �b ,2. LYN .,, :f. LK � !a ,0 ..4- ,tC . Cross-roads GC 5: " r . Crossroad Cc U3 0 . Cremroeds-NC AL 1:20 II A. pits'C' L GA.urwn Cue UGA-Urban Lget Industrial M:m:ra:.kd:r:.c'c ra rCdra Ce r.:r ;�u D®16351 UGA MDR UGA NOR UGA Public UGA Loll igiUGA.Vanm Onuntad Ca.,........en MPR-BRIn Dnneen C orOa'l N RR e LmO Cs em^nz'_,cel Forest- FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Jul 22 16:26:38 http://gi sserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 7/22/2013 JEFFERSON COUNTY !wt ) NO. 142185 DATE �D/ /� RECEIVED FROM 5 - C.'di (134x% / DESCRIPTION RRAR_S# AMOUNT CURRENCY pit /fin IV PK�4 s 2 o2 1 `^r COIN ,Jr-{1i CHECKS G/ 14►y14t3 co 0 M m '° 0 A RECEIVED BY TOTAL (l - vo Donna Frostholm From: Petersen, Deb (PARKS) [Deb.Petersen @PARKS.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:45 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Hinton, Douglas (PARKS); Kirkwood, Rob (PARKS); Amy Stonkus; Amy Stonkus; Hankinson, Michael (PARKS) Cc: Lantz, Lisa (PARKS); Micah Wait Subject: Pre-application meeting August 1st for Dosewallips Fish Passage We are set for our Pre-application meeting with Jefferson County for the Dosewallips Fish Passage project. We will meet at the park office at 11:00 AM on Thursday August 15t. Thanks, Deb 1 PRE13-00016 Pre-application Conference Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Fish Passage Improvements Attendees: Deborah Petersen, State Parks Representative; Doug Hinton, Parks Manager; Rob Kirkwood, Parks Engineer; Mike Hankinson, Southwest Region Parks Planner; Amy Stonkus, Wild Fish Conservancy; Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County DCD. Meeting Date/Time/Location: August 1, 2013/11:00/Dosewallips State Park Owner/Applicant: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of Proposal: The proposal is to improve fish passage on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and to restore stream habitat. The project will replace two culverts with a 20-foot-long by 30-foot-wide steel bridge and will construct a 50-foot-wide floodplain and a 1,270- foot-long channel. The Jefferson County Code (JCC) is available on-line at http://www.codebublishinq.corn/. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Land Use: • Zoned—Parks and Recreation • SEPA(WAC 197-11)—Submit SEPA decision. Shoreline Master Plan: • Shoreline Designations—Conservancy • The application will be processed as a shoreline substantial development permit under JCC Chapter 18.25—Shoreline Master Plan (SMP) unless Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (1) approves a"streamlined" permitting process or(2) prepares a written approval stating that the project meets the requirements of JCC 18.25.090(19), which is a shoreline exemption for projects to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage. Construction for fish passage within segments of the shoreline designated as conservancy is an unclassified use, which requires a conditional use permit. Permitting of conditional uses within shoreline jurisdiction is a Type III process requiring noticing and a public hearing, with the final decision made by the Hearing Examiner(for compliance with the JCC SMP conditions). To comply with permitting requirements, the applicant must demonstrate that the following sections of the SMP are met: JCC 18.25.130— Conservancy; JCC 18.25.200—Conditional uses; and JCC 18.25.220— Unclassified uses. • Jefferson County will forward a copy of the permit and the hearing examiner decision to Washington State Department of Ecology. This agency will have final review of the project for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act. • Regulatory requirements described above are based on current SMP requirements. Note: If a complete application is not received before the SMP Update becomes effective, the application will be reviewed based on criteria specified in the new SMP. As currently identified in the Locally Approved SMP (dated 12-7-09), this proposal would be reviewed as a shoreline substantial development application. The shoreline designations under the new SMP will be Conservancy. The Locally Approved SMP can be found online on the SMP Update webpage, and the proposal would be reviewed under: o Article 6-general policies and regulations; o Article 7.7—restoration; and o Article 9—permit criteria Critical Areas: • Geologically hazardous areas(seismic hazards, intermediate shoreline slope stability)— The JCC requires a geotechnical report be submitted for construction of a publicly-owned facility in a seismic hazard and for development in intermediate areas. Submit a geotechnical report prepared by a licensed engineer or geologist, as per Chapter 18.22 JCC Article V(Geologically Hazardous Areas) and Article VIII (Special Reports). • Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (Type F waterbody)— Proposal will be constructed Twana Creek, which has a 150-foot buffer. Submit a Habitat Management Plan (HMP) prepared by a qualified professional based on Chapter 18.22 JCC Article VI (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas) and Article VIII (Special Reports). • Flood Hazards—Application is subject to the flood damage prevention requirements in Chapter 15.15 JCC and Jefferson County Code Interpretation (dated September 22, 2011). Project must be designed to meet flood requirements in JCC and must meet federal Endangered Species Act requirements. Either of the following must be submitted 1 to address federally-listed species: (1) if applying for Corps permit, submit a copy of a iological Evaluation or(2) if not applying for a Corps permit, submit a Habitat Assessment based on the 2011 FEMA Guidance Document. Wetlands—Any wetlands need the project area need to meet requirements in Chapter 18.22 JCC (Wetlands) and Article VIII (Special Reports). • Aquifer Recharge Areas (Susceptible)— Proposal is not expected to affect aquifer recharge. • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (Coastal) —Proposal is not expected to affect SIPZ. Application and Fees: • Complete Application Includes: o Master Permit Application o SEPA Threshold Determination o JARPA o Site Plan o Proposal Drawings and Details (also include 11"X17" sheets of proposal) o Geotech Report o Habitat Management Plan o Habitat Assessment (or Biological Evaluation) o Stormwater Calculation Worksheet o Fees due at the time of application - e). • A building permit will be needed for this application. Building fees are in addition to those listed above. Bridge must be engineered or designed to meet Forest Service standards. • Septic review will be needed for this application. Septic fees are in addition to those listed above. Environmental Health is not likely to approve placement of a berm over the drainfields. OTHER REGULATORY/LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS • The project must comply with the Shoreline Management Act and receive approval from Washington Department of Ecology. • The proposal will be reviewed by state agencies and tribes. • This project may not need a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This agency has jurisdiction over waters of the U.S., including wetlands. The Corps contact is Karen Urelius (Seattle District/Regulatory). I 1 co ^4w ° JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 *" 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment NgxtNeSG Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd @co.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary): Tax Parcel Number. Property Size: (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: Property Owner(s)of Record: Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑ Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building ❑ Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑ Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]** ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Commercial' ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Change of Use ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach El Short Plat--• ❑ Home Business LI Cottage Industry ❑ Binding Site Plan** ❑ Propane ❑ Long Plat** ❑Sign ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Stormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions""' ❑Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑Temporary Use El Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment *May require a Pre—Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE Date: By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the application that he or she wants prior notice. Signature: Date: The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility for adhering to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaimer and signs and dates it below. Signature: Date: 07/24/2013 ict"---;,i,,,'4-ON c0 JEFFERSON COUNTY `a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT tit rC 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 �� p$ (360) 379-4450 — (360) 379-4451 Fax kINO http:llwww.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template "Medium" and "Large" Projects [Includes Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Permanent Stormwater Control Plan] The submittal template for a Stormwater Site Plan has been developed from information presented in the Department of Ecology 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Manual), which is the set of stormwater management standards for new development and redevelopment in Jefferson County. The Stormwater Site Plan, Minimum Requirement #1 in the Manual, is the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary to evaluate a proposed new development or redevelopment for compliance with stormwater requirements. A Stormwater Site Plan is required for all "medium" and "large" projects. (For background information, refer to the Stormwater Management Information Sheet.) The Stormwater Site Plan includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP — Minimum Requirement#2) that addresses sediment and erosion control during construction and a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan that addresses stormwater on the project site in its developed condition through dispersion, infiltration, or, if necessary, flow control and/or treatment facilities. The steps for preparing and the content of a Stormwater Site Plan are summarized below and more fully described in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the Manual. The attached submittal template is intended to be a format applicable to typical rural residential construction. For these cases, completion and submittal of the template results in a complete land use application. THE TWO MAIN COMPONENTS OF A STORMWATER SITE PLAN I. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan A Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a document that describes the potential for pollution problems on a construction project and which explains and illustrates the measures to be taken to control these problems. The basis for requiring a SWPPP, the twelve elements required to be in a SWPPP, the suggested step-by step procedure to follow, and the suggested Best Management Practices (BMPs) to follow, are all described in Volume II of the Manual. A SWPPP consists of two sections, a narrative and the drawings. A description of the contents of the narrative and the drawings sections, and checklists for each of these sections, are in Section 3.3 of Volume II. For typical rural residential projects, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet to assist with the preparation of the Construction SWPPP. II. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan A Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is a document that describes the basis for, and the means of implementing, permanent Best Management Practices (BMPs) for flow control and treatment facilities after the project is completed. The content of a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is described in Section 3.1.5 of Volume I of the Manual. The permanent BMPs and facilities for flow control and treatment are described in Volumes Ill, IV, and V of the Manual. The submittal template is intended for rural residential projects that can fully disperse or infiltrate stormwater. The template may not be appropriate or sufficient for applications involving larger or more complex projects. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 INSTRUCTIONS To prepare a Stormwater Site Plan, follow the steps outlined below, complete the Stormwater Site Plan template, sign and submit together with the Master Land Use Application (MLA). This information may also be provided on other diagrams, plans, studies, or attachments submitted with the project application. If so, please indicate such on this supplemental permit application. As the template is designed mostly for rural residential development, it may not be as useful for a larger project as an independently prepared Stormwater Site Plan. For any particular project, the Administrator may waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of the application. Note: Prior to filling out the submittal template, read through these steps for preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. Preliminary or draft versions of the individual components may be helpful in the case that redesigning an original layout would result in a proposal that has less environmental impacts and is significantly simpler in terms of meeting stormwater requirements. For example, if the proposal can utilize the "full dispersion"BMP (T5.30 in the Manual), there is no need to provide for flow control or flow treatment on the site. For more information on the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements, refer to the "Low Impact Development"Information Sheet. BMPs used during the construction phase and that are included in the Construction SWPPP may also be useful as elements of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan. STEP 1: COLLECT AND ANALYZE INFORMATION ON EXISTING CONDITIONS Collect and review information on existing site conditions, including topography, drainage patterns, soils, ground cover, critical areas, adjacent areas, existing development, existing stormwater facilities. The Jefferson County website provides an Internet Map Server (IMS)function (http:Rwww.co.jefferson.wa.us). If available,a Development Review Division (DRD)planner may be able to assist you in collecting this information. Analyze the information to determine site limitations,including: • Areas with high potential for erosion and sediment deposition(based on soil properties,slope, etc.); • Locations of sensitive and critical areas (e.g., vegetative buffers, wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, geologically hazardous areas,streams,susceptible aquifer recharge areas,etc.);and • The natural receiving waters to which the stormwater runoff either directly or eventually discharges. This information will be useful in site design and in the completion of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan and Construction SWPPP. STEP 2: PREPARE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT Based upon the analysis of existing site conditions, locate the buildings,driveways, roads, parking lots, and landscaping features for the proposed development. Consider the following points when laying out the site: • Fit development to the terrain to minimize land disturbance; confine construction activities to the least area necessary and away from critical areas; • Preserve areas with natural vegetation(especially forested areas)as much as possible; • On sites with a mix of soil types, locate impervious areas over less permeable soil (e.g., till) and try to restrict development over more porous soils(e.g.,outwash); • Cluster buildings together; • Minimize impervious areas;and • Maintain and utilize the natural drainage patterns. The preliminary development layout will assist in determining threshold discharge areas for calculating whether size thresholds under Minimum Requirements #6, #7, and#8 (for large" projects) are exceeded and as a basis for the drawings and maps required for the Stormwater Site Plan. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 2 STEP 3: PERFORM AN OFF-SITE ANALYSIS This step is for "large" projects (i.e., adding 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, converting % acres of pervious surfaces to lawn or landscaped areas, or converting 2 'A acres of forested area to pasture) at the discretion of the UDC Administrator. See Volume I, Section 2.6.2 for more information. STEP 4: REVIEW THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS The Stormwater Calculation Worksheet is a required submittal for all development and redevelopment land use applications. Completing the Worksheet helps determine the broad category of the proposal—"small," "medium," or "large" project—and the applicable Minimum Requirements. "Small" projects need to meet Minimum Requirement#2 only. "Medium" projects need to meet Minimum Requirements #1 through#5. "Large" projects need to meet all the Minimum Requirements, #1 through#10. The Minimum Requirements are as follows: 1. Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans(Chapter 3 of Manual) 6. Runoff Treatment 2. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 7. Flow Control 3. Source Control of Pollution 8. Wetlands Protection 4. Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls 9. Basin/Watershed Planning 5. On-site Stormwater Management 10. Operation and Maintenance The Manual provides descriptions and instructions in Volume I, Chapter 2. Information sheets,application materials,and DRD planners can help describe the Minimum Requirements to applicants. Note: "Large" projects, as part of meeting Minimum Requirements #6 – Runoff Treatment – and #7 – Flow Control, are compared to Volume 1, Chapter 2 in the Manual to determine whether on-site stormwater management BMPs are sufficient or treatment facilities or flow control facilities are required. The flow control determination may necessitate use of the Western Washington Hydrology Model managed by the Department of Ecology. Consult Sections 2.5.6 and 2.5.7 of Volume I, Chapter 2 of the Manual for more information. Again, the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements is to design the project so that natural drainage is preserved, impervious surface is limited, and full dispersion (BMP T5.30) is implemented. By using "low impact development" techniques in the site design, the need for treatment and flow control facilities is eliminated, simplifying preparation of the Stormwater Site Plan and often the site construction process itself. For more information on these techniques,consult the"Low Impact Development" Information Sheet. STEP 5: PREPARE A PERMANENT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Select stormwater control BMPs and facilities that will serve the project site in its developed condition. The selection process is presented in Volume I, Chapter 4. After consideration is given to how selected BMPs and facilities fit within and serve the entire preliminary development layout, the designer may want to reconsider the site layout to reduce the need for construction of facilities or the size of the facilities by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces created and increasing the areas to be left undisturbed. The Permanent Stormwater Control Plan should contain the following sections(Section 3.1.5 of Volume I, Chapter 3): • Existing Site Hydrology(i.e., the behavior of water on the site—above, below,and on the ground) • Developed Site Hydrology (special requirements for projects and threshold discharge areas within projects that requirement treatment and flow facilities) • Performance Standards and Goals • Flow Control System • Water Quality System • Conveyance System Analysis and Design Essentially, in terms of site hydrology, the developed condition of the site should match the pre-developed condition, with is forested land cover (unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement). For "large" projects, totals of impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution generating pervious surfaces must be tabulated for each threshold discharge area for which on-site BMPs are the sole stormwater management approach. stars-meter site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 3 STEP 6: PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP for projects adding or replacing 2,000 square feet of impervious surface or more or clearing 7,000 square feet or more (i.e., "medium" or "large" projects), must contain sufficient information to demonstrate to the UDC Administrator that the potential pollution problems have been adequately addressed for the proposed project. An adequate Construction SWPPP includes a narrative and drawings. The narrative is a written statement to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for a particular project. The narrative contains concise information concerning existing site conditions, construction schedules, and other pertinent items that are not contained on the drawings. The drawings and notes describe where and when the various BMPs should be installed, the performance the BMPs are expected to achieve, and actions to be taken if the performance goals are not achieved. There are 12 Elements that must be considered in the development of a Construction SWPPP, unless site conditions render that element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly justified in the narrative. The 12 Elements cover the general water quality protection strategies for limiting site impacts during construction and are described in detail in Section 2.5.2, Volume I of the Manual. The 12 Elements of Minimum Requirement#2,Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention,are: 1. Mark Clearing Limits 5. Stabilize Soils 9. Control Pollutants 2. Establish Construction Access 6. Protect Slopes 10. Control De-watering 3. Control Flow Rates 7. Protect Drain Inlets 11. Maintain BMPs 4. Install Sediment Controls 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets 12. Manage the Project For ease of use, the Stormwater Site Plan submittal template below includes a section that lists the 12 Elements and provides the opportunity to include sufficient information for rural residential and other relatively simple Construction SWPPPs. For more complex projects, a separate narrative and set of plans may be preferred or required. Volume II of the Manual is dedicated to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. A step-by-step BMP selection process and a complete description of the BMPs applicable to each element is provided in Chapters 3 and 4. Additionally, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet that summarizes the 12 Elements and excerpts from the Manual sample sediment and erosion control measures for typical rural residential development. The Packet should prove useful for completing the Construction SWPPP component of the submittal template. On construction sites that infiltrate all stormwater runoff,the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is the protection of the infiltration facilities from fine sediments during the construction phase and protection of ground water from other pollutants. On construction sites that discharge to surface water, the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is compliance with the State Water Quality Standards. The step-by-step procedure outlined in Volume II, Section 3.2 is recommended for the development of these Construction SWPPPs. STEP 7: COMPLETE THE STORMWATER SITE PLAN The Stormwater Site Plan encompasses the entire submittal to Jefferson County in conjunction with a land use or building permit application. The following documents or sections should be included: • Project Overview • Existing Conditions Summary • Off-site Analysis Report(if required;usually for"large"projects) • Permanent Stormwater Control Plan • Special Reports and Studies(such as soil testing,wetland delineation,etc., if applicable) • Other Permits(approvals required by other regulatory agencies that include stormwater management conditions) • Operation and Maintenance Manual(for each flow control and treatment facility, if applicable) • Bond Quantities Worksheet (for performance bond or other financial guarantee for proper construction and operation of construction site BMPs and permanent drainage facilities, if required) The submittal template below is designed for rural residential and other relatively small or simple projects. For larger and more complex projects—particularly those that involve stormwater treatment and/or flow control—more information may be required and an independent Stormwater Site Plan may be the preferable submittal format. STEP 8: CHECK COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS A Stormwater Site Plan as designed and implemented should specifically fulfill all Minimum Requirements applicable to the project. The applicant should review to check that these requirements are satisfied and that all information provided is true and correct prior to signing and submitting the Stormwater Site Plan. (The signature box appears at the end of the submittal template.) stormwater site plan template—rev.10/2112008 4 gN 0.„ JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 1S, O" 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax RING http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 5 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes, etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands, lakes,steep slopes,etc.). Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual) or, if not, what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large" projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. 12. Describe the flow control system. stormwater site plan template-rev.10121/2008 13. Describe the water quality system. 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. 15. Describe the source of fill material, physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large°projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals here. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements, describe those conditions or restrictions here. stormwater site plan template-rev.10/2112008 7 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at Volume II Section 3.2.3 of the Manual (beginning on page 3-7). 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. 2. Establish Construction Access. 3. Control Flow Rates. 4. Install Sediment Controls. 5. Stabilize Soils. 6. Protect Slopes. 7. Protect Drain Inlets. stormwater site plan template-rev.10/2112008 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. 9. Control Pollutants. 10. Control De-Watering (the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). 11. Maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs). 12. Manage the Project. 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads). b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 9 b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g., erodibility, settleability, permeability,depth,texture, soil structure). 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence b. Construction phasing(if proposed) 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). I. Provide a proposed construction schedule. II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations 0 slormwater site plan template-rev.10/21/2008 SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan, a stormwater site plan, and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. b. North arrow. c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines, pasture areas, etc.). d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries(if applicable). f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales, interceptor trenches, or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches, or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades, dimensions, and direction of flow in all ditches, swales,culverts and pipes. e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s), pond(s), pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth, length, and width dimensions. d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe,and/or other filtering devices. f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s), if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g., concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2108 11 Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities, flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts") when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: stormwater site plan template—rev.10/21/2008 12 Jefferson County Department Of Community Development STORMWATER MANAGEMENT HANDOUT Select definitions from the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwvater Management Manual for Western Washington. 2.3 Definitions Related to Minimum Requirements A full listing and definition of stormwater-related words and phrases that are used in this manual is given in the glossary. A few of the key definitions are listed here for ease in understanding the requirements that follow. • Arterial- A road or street primarily for through traffic. A major arterial connects an Interstate Highway to cities and counties. A minor arterial connects major arterials to collectors. A collector connects an arterial to a neighborhood. A collector is not an arterial. A local access road connects individual homes to a collector. • Effective Impervious surface-Those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete conveyance to a drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if the runoff is dispersed through at least one hundred feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30—"Full Dispersion," as described in Chapter 5 of Volume V. • Highway—A main public road connecting towns and cities • Impervious surface-A hard surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include,but are not limited to,roof tops,walkways,patios, driveways,parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads,packed earthen materials,and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open,uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open,uncovered retention/detention facilities shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. 2-4 Volume I—Minimum Technical Requirements August 2001 • Land disturbing activity-Any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non- vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures and road construction shall also be considered a land disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices are not considered land-disturbing activity. • Maintenance-Repair and maintenance includes activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of structures and systems. Those usual activities may include and replacement of disfunctioning facilities, including cases where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type structure, as long as the functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed, fish blocking,round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. For further details on the application of this manual to various road management functions, please see Section 2.2. • Native vegetation—Vegetation comprised of plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include trees such as Douglas Fir,western hemlock,western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple,and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry,and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower,and fireweed. • New development-Land disturbing activities, including Class IV - general forest practices that are conversions from timber land to other uses; structural development, including construction or installation of a building or other structure; creation of impervious surfaces; and subdivision, short subdivision and binding site plans, as defined and applied in Chapter 58.17 RCW. Projects meeting the definition of redevelopment shall not be considered new development. • Pollution-generating impervious surface (PGIS) -Those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant source of pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial activities(as further defined in the glossary); or storage of erodible or leachable materials,wastes, or chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall. Erodible or leachable materials,wastes, or chemicals are those August 2001 Volume I— Minimum Technical Requirements 2-5 substances which, when exposed to rainfall,measurably alter the physical or chemical characteristics of the rainfall runoff. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled,uncovered process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage. Metal roofs are also considered to be PGIS unless they are coated with an inert, non-leachable material (e.g., baked-on enamel coating). A surface, whether paved or not, shall be considered subject to vehicular use if it is regularly used by motor vehicles. The following are considered regularly-used surfaces: roads, unvegetated road shoulders,bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway, driveways, parking lots, unfenced fire lanes,vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways. The following are not considered regularly-used surfaces: paved bicycle pathways separated from and not subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles, fenced firelanes, and infrequently used maintenance access roads. • Pollution generating pervious surfaces (PGPS) -Any non- impervious surface subject to use of pesticides and fertilizers or loss of soil. Typical PGPS include lawns, landscaped areas, golf courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields. • Pre-developed condition—The native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of Euro-American settlement. The pre- developed condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement. • Project site- That portion of a property,properties, or right of way subject to land disturbing activities, new impervious surfaces, or replaced impervious surfaces. • Receiving waters -Bodies of water or surface water systems to which surface runoff is discharged via a point source of stormwater or via sheet flow. • Redevelopment-On a site that is already substantially developed(i.e., has 35% or more of existing impervious surface coverage), the creation or addition of impervious surfaces; the expansion of a building footprint or addition or replacement of a structure; structural development including construction, installation or expansion of a building or other structure;; replacement of impervious surface that is not part of a routine maintenance activity; and land disturbing activities. 2-6 Volume I— Minimum Technical Requirements August 2001 • Replaced impervious surface- For structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious surfaces or foundation. For other impervious surfaces, the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement. • Site—The area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to new development or redevelopment. For road projects,the length of the project site and the right-of-way boundaries define the site. • Source control BMP-A structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with stormwater through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants. This manual separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural Source Control BMPs are physical, structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from entering stormwater. Operational BMPs are non-structural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants from entering stormwater. See Volume IV for details. • Threshold Discharge Area- An onsite area draining to a single natural discharge location or multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one-quarter mile downstream (as determined by the shortest flowpath). The examples in Figure 2.1 below illustrate this definition. The purpose of this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this manual are applied to project sites with multiple discharge points. Exampla of a Project She Exam*of.Praia Site Eumnpt of a Project Site with a Ssngl.Natural with Multiple Mew* with Multiple Natural Dl.hrg.and•Single Oheharges and a Single McInnes and MWtiple Threshold Discharge Ares Ttrashoid Discharge Area Threshold Discharge Areas .AREA is yam . ♦ \♦\- 1 N_ - `` •--`ry 1� J t 1� +l Natural 1 Discharge t al --A / Discharge flmme • LocaliOn Locations t t Loca50cu t r 1 •� r •� • i 34 Mile Downstream — (shortest flow path) • T --��-- Figure 2.1 Threshold Discharge Areas August 2001 Volume 1— Minimum Technical Requirements 2-7 18.25.120 Cipunty planning and building department. Any 18.25.130 Conservancy. structure not utilized for over one year sha. be (1) Definition. An area with valuable natural, removed regardless of future anticipated use less cultural, or historical resources or environmental prior permission has been granted by the Je -rson conditions that should be protected,conserved,and County planning and building departmen upon managed to the extent that a continual supply of show"i g of good cause. those resources such as soil, water, timber, fish, '.) Permittees for developments in the shellfish, or wildlife are not degraded or depleted aquatic .esignation shall be required to ..st a per- but are maintained. Also included are areas con- forman..- bond or other suitable guarant:- to ensure taming sensitive environmental conditions that removal 4 all structures,equipment, . • materials, may limit the potential for development or use, should the project cease operation.Th: county may including but not limited to steep slopes, flood- require s- 'ty beyond that required .y the state if prone areas, eroding bluffs, marshes, bogs, it is dete ed that state requireme• are not ade- swamps, and accretion shore forms. Low density quate to sec - removal of structur . residential and recreational uses are permitted pro- (c) Pe i"ttees shall be liabl: for all damages vided these activities do not significantly degrade to public and private property s ould their strut- or deplete resources and respect limiting environ- tures fail. The ounty may req - liability insur- mental condition. ance beyond <t required by the state if it is (2) Policy. To protect, conserve, and manage determined that s..to requireme is are not adequate existing resources and valuable historical and cul- to cover damages. tural areas in order to ensure sustained resource (d) Aquatic develops. •nts shall not be stabilization and that sensitive natural conditions approved in narrow hannels shipping lanes,or in are not subject to inappropriate uses. [Ord. 11-00§ other areas where .,, are . significant hazard to 5(4.103)] navigation. (e) All strut - :t could interfere with 18.25. 40 Suburban. navigation shall be mar. •P in accordance with the (1) fmition. Areas where residential ac • ity U.S. Coast Guard Private- 'ds to Navigation. may app oath urban density, but usually here (f) The maximum :.el for noise generated - densities rmit space for small numbers f live- in the aquatic designatio sh, be 50 dBA at a dis- stock, g ns, or wood lots. These , Lance of 100 feet.This Jana . d shall not apply to served by in.:vidual or community watersupplies, vessels that are unde ay. ' , feasible methods but generally . e not linked with utilities from an shall be employed t. minimiz. overwater noise urban center. I.mmercial activities 'to serve the generation. needs of the imm-•'ate area are considered an inte- (g) Structures laced in the •i,uatic designa- gral part of this .•.ignation. Lion shall blend mt..the surroundin: to the great- (2) Policy. To provide permanent residential est extent feasibl u • ' 'ng appropn• e color(s), and recreational are outside of urban areas, so texture, nonreflec.'ve •aterials, and o•t er design long as development .f these areas provides ade- characteristics. [ri rd. -00§5(4.101)] quate facilities for se- :ge •'sposal, water supply, open space, and the •. . •thout severe degrada- 18.25.120 Na . Lion to the lifestyle tha • sought initially. [Ord. (1) Defini.on A shoreline possessing •que 11-00§5(4.104)] or fragile f- : either natural or cultural, • at essentially, 1. -red from their natural state .r rel- 18.25.150 Ur, . atively int¢I- . 1 t of human use other than .t for (1) Defmitio 1 The urban -nvir.,•1 ent is an passive anti 'ties.Included are those areas c. ■taro- area of high in nsity land use, • uding residen- ing hazardous or unique environmental condi•ons, tial, commer •. , and indus.•.. . -velopment. Ur- such as highly erosive bluffs, tidal marshes,. :stu- ban shore •1 - should .• desi:.:ted for high aries,and active landslides. intensity or mul ' .,,,' y reside.tial develop- (2)/Policy. Aquaculture developments . .d went.The 1 .an des'.:.ation may also ,- applied to met ized harvest practices involving substan . areas of 1 wer int:i sity use where the s; ounding sub a modification through dredging, trenc'- land use s .. • and urban services are . ailable. in digging, or adverse sedimentation should .= (2) 'olici:.... p hibited in wetlands and estuaries which are rat- .) ► -velopment in urban areas sho, d be environmental designations in this master pro- mana -■ so it enhances and maintains the s .re- . [Ord. 11-00§5(4.102)] line '. a variety of urban uses, with prefere i (Revised 10/01) 18-128 Jefferson County Code 18.25.200 • \teed 35 feet as measured from mean higher high .\ During application review,the basic - ement or i\•vater(MI-IHW). intent of a proposed development will b,ide in the (e) The redevelopment and revisi•n of determination of the proposal's p. cular use existing wharves and piers may be pe • tted to activity.When a proposal contains tw• or more use serve water-dependent or water-relat.• uses. acti ;ties within a shoreline desi y ation, each Water enjoyment and non-water-orient-. ses may activ ty may be reviewed indepen•-ntly and the be a thorized as conditional uses on ese struc- total • .ject considered on the who -. tures, rovided such uses are integra • • lements to In •e review of a shoreline • rmit, consider- an ove , redevelopment plan meeti : all of the ation - be given to the cum .live impact the follow; • conditions: project • ay have with similar .e activities. This i) The redevelopment is •, an existing, review i to ensure that the re•ulting total effect contribu -•: structure within the W: er Street Na- will not th art the intent and •',licies of the partic- tional Hist• 'c District as reco i•. :• by the Na- ular shore •e environmen .. designation, nor tional Trust ,•r Historic Preserva 'on; result in su•.tantial del, .• . ,on of the shoreline (ii) 1 •- structure is rec r gnized by appro- itself. [Ord. 1 -00 §5(4.20)] priate historic • -servation agen.es as having local and state-wide "storic signific. ce; 18.25180 ' - ry uses. (iii) - structure h.• an established his- (1) Definition. In ge•- . , those categories of tory of mixed u ■ , both wat::-oriented and non- uses that are deem,d as •--•g preferable with the water-oriented use ; definition and polic of . particular shoreline des- (iv) The -•evelop a ent does not exceed ignation. the structure's histo c,ove • ater footprint; (2) Criteria. Prim. / uses are presumed to be (v) Buildin_s an other structures lo- generally consistent wi : the policies and definition cated on the wharf or 'ier : e approved by appro- of the shoreline desi;,•..1-on where it is located. priate historic prese •a'on agencies as being Projects will be revie ed or consistency with spe- compatible and reinfo of of the architectural in- cific goals and polic'-s an must comply with the tegrity of the historic disF.ct; performance stand. r• s••a red for the particular (vi) A signific, element or component type of developmen being r•viewed.[Ord. 11-00§ of the developed area i dedicated to water-depen- 5(4.201)] dent and water-related •ses; (vii) At leas one-••- d of the pile sup- 18.25.190 Seco: r ary uses. ported structure incl i- g a •.rimeter walkway is (1) Definitio .Those uses •. are not automat- dedicated for public access any enjoyment of the ically deemed .• being preferab • within the scope shoreline. All pub ' access p •visions shall be of the definitio, or policy of a • i cular shoreline completed and ay. able for pub use upon corn- environmental designation. pletion of the first omponent of ' - development; (2) Crite Applicants for sh• -line substan- (viii) e redevelopment will not result tial develop'',ent permits for seco••ary uses will in a reduction in e amount of phys . public ac- have the bur•en of proof to demons : e that: cess to and ove•the water as currentl exists; (a) e proposal will not be c.•trary to the (ix) e city of Port Townse•• shall be a general in •nt of the Shoreline Mana•-ment Act, party to a bins:ng agreement to guaran -• that pub- nor shall - be contrary to the goals, po;cies, and lic access . • enjoyment provisions are ontinu- perform.. ce standards of this master pros am. ously main .-ned.[Ord. 11-00§5(4.106)] (• The proposed project will not m. erially interfe•- with the public use of public Ian. and 18.25.170 Project classifications. wate • or the private use of adjacent private 1. ds. Devel••ment proposals are categorized I. (c) The proposed project will not .' se each sh• cline designation as primary, secon• , unn essary adverse effects on the environmen or conditi• •al,or prohibited uses.This priority sys :• other properties and will be compatible with oth-r dete ••• •es the proposals administrative requir.- permitted uses in the area.[Ord 11-00§5(4.202 1 men •and encourages activities that are compatibl• with/each shoreline designation. In all cases, the 18.25.200 Conditional uses. applicant shall have the burden of proof to show (1) Definition.Those uses that are deemed least coistency with the provisions of the Act and this preferable within the scope of the defmition and aster program. policies of a particular shoreline environmental designation. While not prohibited outright, these 18-131 (Revised 10/01) Jefferson County Locally Approved SMP 1 2. This Program recognizes the importance of restoring shoreline ecological 2 functions and processes. Jefferson County supports cooperative restoration efforts 3 by strategically organizing programs between local, state, and federal public 4 agencies, tribes,non-profit organizations, and landowners to improve shorelines 5 with impaired ecological functions and/or processes. 6 3. Restoration actions should restore shoreline ecological functions and processes as 7 well as shoreline features and should be targeted toward meeting the needs of 8 sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish and wildlife species. 9 4. Restoration should be integrated with and should support other natural resource 10 management efforts in Jefferson County and in the greater Puget Sound region. 11 5. Priority should be given to restoration actions that meet the goals and objectives 12 contained in Article 3 section 6 (Restoration and Enhancement) of this Program. 13 6. When prioritizing restoration actions, the County should give highest priority to 14 measures that have the greatest chance of reestablishing ecosystem processes and 15 creating self-sustaining habitats. 16 B. Shoreline Environment Regulations 17 1. Priority Aquatic: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this 18 Program. 19 2. Aquatic: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this Program. 20 3. Natural: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this Program. 21 4. Conservancy: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this Program. 22 5. Shoreline Residential: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this 23 Program. 24 6. High Intensity: Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this 25 Program. 26 C. Regulations 27 1. Restoration shall be carried out in accordance with an approved restoration plan 28 and in accordance with the policies and regulations of this Program. 29 8. Structural Shoreline Armoring and Shoreline Stabilization 30 A. Policies 31 1. The County should take active measures to preserve natural unarmored shorelines 32 and prevent the proliferation of bulkheads and other forms of shoreline armoring. 33 2. Non-structural stabilization measures including relocating structures, increasing 34 buffers, enhancing vegetation, managing drainage and runoff and other measures 35 are preferred over structural shoreline armoring. Article 7—Shoreline Modifications Policies&Regulations Page December 7,2009 7-29 , , T .,... . , _ . - . .. .... t ,. ,,, ,.., ,. „, , ,„,,,,. .. . . , 1 ,,, ..,,..,„.„..:,.... ,,,..„.„...,,,,„, . „.,. _,,,,,.....„.„„,,,,,..„..,.,, ... ,.._ . ....., ,,,,....„..,,,„,„,..„...,,,,,,,,...„..,,,.,,,.„„,„„,'1.1"..7*!'.":,,,'a'''Y'';:.;.?'t,+,,-;,■,.;''''.f...r ,'. ' ' • ' . , I r zF t""R 't;?";.:�'# `"r ,. _"fit yak• 1 • „" C .'F3NZe++,l J+i+n4a.y,fit Before You I Permits .I • Before you proceed with a project in or near the water, contact the Common Uses Requiring Department of Natural Resources. Authorizations from DNR We will help you determine if your • outfalls project will fall on state-owned • docks aquatic lands. If it does, we can help • piers you navigate the process. aquaculture For activities within • other activities located City of Port Townsend or on State-owned aquatic Jefferson County lands. please contact DNR at 360-732-0934 STATE-GVVNED AQUATIC LANDS INCLUDE BEDLANDS Of PUGET SOUND,MANY TIDELANDS,AND THE BEDS AND SHORELANDS OE LAKES AND RIVERS. `I WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LA Natural I 1 r.Wa.gOV Natural Resources v PRE13-00016 Pre-application Conference Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Fish Passage Improvements Attendees: Deborah Petersen, State Parks Representative; Doug Hinton, Parks Manager; Rob Kirkwood, Parks Engineer; Mike Hankinson, Southwest Region Parks Planner; Arny Stonkus, Wild Fish Conservancy; Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County DCD. Meeting Date/Time/Location: August 1, 2013/11:00/Dosewallips State Park Owner/Applicant: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of Proposal: The proposal is to improve fish passage on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and to restore stream habitat. The project will replace two culverts with a 20-foot-long by 30-foot-wide steel bridge and will construct a 50-foot-wide floodplain and a 1,270- foot-long channel. The Jefferson County Code (JCC) is available on-line at http://www.codepublishinq.com/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Land Use: • Zoned — Parks and Recreation • SEPA(WAC 197-11)—Submit SEPA decision. Shoreline Master Plan: • Shoreline Designations—Conservancy • The application will be processed as a shoreline substantial development permit under JCC Chapter 18.25— Shoreline Master Plan (SMP) unless Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (1) approves a "streamlined" permitting process or(2) prepares a written approval stating that the project meets the requirements of JCC 18.25.090(19), which is a shoreline exemption for projects to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage. Construction for fish passage within segments of the shoreline designated as conservancy is an unclassified use, which requires a conditional use permit. Permitting of conditional uses within shoreline jurisdiction is a Type III process requiring noticing and a public hearing, with the final decision made by the Hearing Examiner(for compliance with the JCC SMP conditions). To comply with permitting requirements, the applicant must demonstrate that the following sections of the SMP are met: JCC 18.25.130— Conservancy; JCC 18.25.200— Conditional uses; and JCC 18.25.220— Unclassified uses. • Jefferson County will forward a copy of the permit and the hearing examiner decision to Washington State Department of Ecology. This agency will have final review of the project for compliance with the Shoreline Management Act. • Regulatory requirements described above are based on current SMP requirements. Note: If a complete application is not received before the SMP Update becomes effective, the application will be reviewed based on criteria specified in the new SMP. As currently identified in the Locally Approved SMP (dated 12-7-09), this proposal would be reviewed as a shoreline substantial development application. The shoreline designations under the new SMP will be Conservancy. The Locally Approved SMP can be found online on the SMP Update webpage, and the proposal would be reviewed under: o Article 6 -general policies and regulations; o Article 7.7—restoration; and o Article 9—permit criteria O ;1! i • N , ci RI° g a B i 0 PZ > 4 11 51 tmll CA c S n z r 4. \ .. IP a >b P:mi °.....II V. tiliMil till el 4 V.--. 4 A z Ls.% . Qoik - "V 'z' r•-. -ci > Pi t 2 7.0,40,.... t.-Pl• r. ._ , v y .tip to a �` v 0 a at 1 ' NrlielliWaintit07.41L "' P .,,,I , 1-0 0 -1 ' .441,. R ;iiiipt : 4.-.. 04 CA 8 ri we, g pi,- . No--, 0 0 rn rZ11. > > CI ?3"1 R f ~z i s , fTl i n 4 i_- c ot . . i I i osk , ,,,,o- , ,;. ,, F4 ›. ,,,x , Tir Ict. ___ A. ,. 17 N.-. in p'r* 4 ,_,H-3 . ., k--, t. ji . ,. . , . „„z;;, ':'.:' --4-- - 4 s "A 1 _■ ,' 'a 1 I § f!..,a) si z_ ,77:7,/. i, ______.__ , , ,r1 le, AN, .:: i p V :; 9 , 71 4 L k j 14 1 0- .. 0 .1. .O `V_ a I m o J ...7- 6 'P COO X ' ‘1, wvty i ,f.1;•5:,,. 4111 .1 Y 7 by 11' N 8 8 .�. v t; 1... F._R .-R it N 4» V Q` 4A "/ W N .-R _ _ ti 1. + C7 tII O4 of O, u � W N F+ 47 -� � �+. :� _ : _ r' r i ?:,1;. l //... Of". .;. ' . .2. Ni. .. ,' r mnrnm +sim 'i m mmm5! Z° z R El 1 C_„ � � � � W p � . ooc000000000L r zzzzzzzzzzzZ „ '►1 „ -71 p 1 a 99000co90000 T " " 1 V= w t.' ..:2^� w� .t to r.:.; o v CC r to Z tae ,4 it Cg ..',, v 8 .■+, u v • C ...—- ..- i 4 .... _._. - C> - - - - - ..- -- ,- I 1 1 l :-.,' --,: -: :-T i I \1 ', ..: - .■-• r 6 r,,,,, 2., _ ._, 1 _ 1 a .- 2 8 V „, -ri. ,.... I 1 1 i ..11 ?,i I A i . '. R ' s t,7: ..... LI I' i i g g Pr' - - - -1 a a rn rpm k 77 43 61 wi cm P ; E _... I o _--- i I 1 2 A -8 u ' t ; r". .,,,- , „.„,....„.0-•- , ut 2 0 4!4,, tt -,C 1. trek. I i : i :"i /r - 7 4 4 .. ,. ..0 _....4-,e- „.- 1 " i f 4- _.„, rt1- >N,„:1::.,:.e: \ ,.....4- x.g P .7. )1/ _ ._ /4 M )( - R.117,..s , _ 1.,,,,,-- - -,...... . *-._ P ...,n I. 4kttr- ...tv t AL ■-I 31- ., . - 11- -:7 ri -4 ' 441 , .i. . . L._ -. c I 4 - 47 . \ _ ..... ..,r r . ' i .? e . r. 7 , . F.. ) r. c z , / -ow I( • 11100iiiiiit / ,-. „..., _, - r ., .....,.., e f \\,,,, 7 _ 1 r -4”\\ \• \ 7.. i , I 1. . . _7 _ )44\ icif... - ._ , •....,...4.. 4. _,......,,, •,t ..,_ i *_____-_____3.______f i , I K...., • 4,.7. , ....: - - 7 9 Ci .. ...--- . __ / - - I , Nip i -- . . 1 - 's ...,.. . --_, -----7=--- Z' -,,.: .c)191 -_,--7----- _-17---.-7--.:4-7-..-----*-- --- - ---' ....... CO - _ , „•.„. ..'- I _ , 71 e„. H :-.T. , L 0 71 , N.) / , --J 0 i 0 ,-. .- rT1 73 5z .I; 4 t _. — -, to „.... 0 i- ...._ 1, 13. E _ a i7c 3i -i C. ./ I CA 4 ;= ' 1 .11 I 1015113,1 i RV 1 ets I :Are -.*•••■•--, . -,.................-,....■.....-.,_. , , -1111110•1--, ‘..-.....„, : . 1 _ t - .0 1 . It _ - ...., i I,:, 1 1 ...■ / i ! .1 - I . iltll,. 1 I 0 rr fri -n -- r- 1.11 3'. I 1 r . „. I , q • t , ..r. / , e 0 g A i / rro 4.,.,, IL / -IN di ...... ?".., P3. 1 I i - ' . -- , 1 , . ' 1 / ,....... .? , "' r*i... r.- , T',_ i CO 7 • -,= ".- . / --.„ „,____ i WI .--,. b ..„''' / ..- / ,. 1 , `.. ,. • -.. ,• ! , / •11.." , ,,,.... i 1 . • , At 4 --.. 't " -. /g\ 7 11111111111k, - ''. At 1 4O \•,..e '),T....V , if T....7 1 i b..,, 1 ( 7.' O .-N'T ...„,CP % "-" ,.4 ' . Oi .,...,,y ' ' 1. 1 ' .' 4 , Ir.. ilailallb. - / r -4 , 1 ik' ' %el A e 1 1 ,..,„Nc • ■ • -4, ' P. .---i 4-'. , \si ,,,,'•'!< , ... , . . . , , , ... • . . . . .-"/ --.._ *..V. ,. ..„, .1* 4,- C.j.) ,f . . .1.'II ' / I: ly'4./1 , 7 I' ":' ... . -+•/./ R. "-.. Fl . -''. !..!> ... N / . \ / ... / / \ . Is'L „......f ,.. .4.X . . - e '-.......,... 1 i" "14 it. 't • ,:1 / ,:, ",," , • 1: //. .....-›* / 1...,::',. ;:4/ .."‘f.,44:} .-- / t . 41' ' 1 N„ ---.,.. '5' ' 5 ., / .. i . , • \ _ .,.., 1-:'' Q ,/ , "N.A.,,„------ .1 . / ,,, 7 • cr, •-.„ r. I.. '''j:Y'I />:---.-.''--' ' '..,, / 'IP .e.....1.)?. -," .71. . .....1....,....„ ..,' /17----- ,--- .„.7 ,.- '--:',.- \.. \. .-r . , ___ .,.. ......,. ). • , c- ...,_ ''. . o. .,...: ,. '-'. 4/ //i"/". ,../ ,/ 4*"."-.• : ,e_„„.../ i ' t :,-1 ;.. ---e- ''.."---- N 73 ,41, ....-• ---''--.1%CX . / .. - ,,,. , (l/T, -- ,,-" ',, /, _/— ' 1 ,,, .. / 1., c CI SY '.. .:.. '' 4 g , Pt 4111111, ..--) ., .a ) c''' ' ' ( 1, / -1.- -r ul 1 '') 4121111116h: .,gr 4--,..0/1.4,1-. y.z- j 17- ‘ ..-.. ,.., -....„. -__ , ._ : --....., ? , !. I ''''' .7. ,..'''tl.- i -- '''.• 7 1 / 1. i i .04. .., .../..,- 1 it : • )1/ C 1 ,‘ 4 . * _ I '/ g I pi- N, •— . , --; //7/ 1 \NA , k ..._ A h' __ ---/ __.--2\--,_ _ --' _,,, _, —.-- ''.. T --"' '- _- . . ,. / i/ ;2.. 1..'8 V''' _4 ) . - FA" ------- - ---_„:-- -- ..- .- i K.Scl N.1 _,,, 71.1 _ ■,.J _-•' . --4 4107!,•-„ : 111 . . .-- -- -"--- . , ,. (') ' ' '''' ,.5 T,•'-,;"-r ...- : ' 07 , ....,....1.,p, - . (..D . ._....\\.0.,.„„.,ii.:-.vr.--_,, , ....; , .- — - - i , . . Hill i 54„. E xt g 1 R v) M 1 0 1 1 > ITI 9 s ro V .I''.4 rn — CO X ,:-A > Ln 2 v.< P2 q rri * ....4 -i o 1 i 0 x :I* ;!ri i E 0 0 • 8 . : ,... z m 2 5 g 1 x 3? NO MEMOS \\NY \ , ..... 1 '\, /1\ in . . f 3 7 ...) v., --4 13+50 ? 1 1 i 1 "Si n 1 e 1,,,:k \\ "^.. ..., ••• ... ' ...- .., ...!.7.;'T J1/4„....,„-. ::: \ _----- — ,.., 7 ,.. ----- *E_ , a L.') A."' " --V. -. . . . r.D1 •..- -'- - ,......-.-- , n il t+ 8813i .?..5 ,-- 1---., '.- ,_------ A+-;+... 'Z 1 i \\\ gi R. .- ,..- cs's ti 7- ,.....'. ..." '''''' <.‘ e iigi, 11! ,----- P---, cr 4 i i ' S 4'1. X eiel., ■ , , ...-r--- ,--"--e' e-- ` p- .,.. __.- `c- / ...---- r----r i \<,. / 7 _, ..... i --: . \ , e.--<„, - a \ ..." C- , .t 4 ; , - "-- • .„..„,,,,,------' /.0-.„.. .,-• ' - -."'*' 4 0 , ,-, / <, / , , _ ,, k,, ,i g /." .• +I■rer '''' T, ol 8 c Ig . ,...... 3. 8 z • ,.. 10,41. \ 1,\\, , I i ',.1. --. U 0 tn 0 ..-- r •'I ' /i rn C .< X ..1 4 . 0 ,-, 6 ED \ .,------ 1 xi 2 2 _ - ? ° al' 44 .... -- ir.// - il -4 47) q Cii ..., "O' le) 1'4 /7 ..- . • m 1 Lo > 1 ,,r-f7 '\.. .- \-\\,:\ .iloi ,c ri*le• CC: '4? - , e \ ... ^ - s, \ .\yref Fn. 0 r 1 0 CD T 'um'X ', , , \ \ 's, \ \ ;IR(0111110;Hi 1 ■$4'. 10, ,, N / 1 4 I Ali. ..., , / , ■ .-t .0b1A44:0" . C.1 Q1 7 ,' AJ A ' icr \ ,.....,,..., / § 1.0? 0 . / e .. \s\NNL,\.\\*\"..,.\..\\\.\. \\ \\\\ ' lr' i. '': '''4' ‘114‘. ... r •t; I c ■ rn g 11 , ■ /, Nt, 4 -.7 Yi , /...ti 4, - -4■ I-n 0 IC -1 g _ 0, .41 ... _ .1 ei m w r-7-. j. 7 9 ,v. : 2 -.1 01:5° -z->,-)\ , \vi rn , gil 1 _., p--- -.. , iiii.‘ , 7 ilk II 1 `1, , 1 ■ I 1 'I' ri , - ., 41i .4511 r I- 3,, E 6 .a — -1- Co '''' I ' R +, 1 i •°- ...1 o 1 +++, , , x 1 ; t. ,* I 1 , -- _ . ru .b. •"'•- , I 17.....0.11 '-•11 1 0-i 00 ... —.-.-———. GO i . - """'-' --.----- _....- - ,_ A A s 1 , , %R. ' +) , + * _ _ _ - _ ___ - . ii 1 , m 4. A _ 11:4T1'11 , )cc„,j1, /111:17‘71 -----:------ I 1 ', 1 G-- l'i I (ii I ' 1 I 'i ' ' ),'1 . 1sl - ■ r....J --- 4 \ 4- - 3D e... 7,171 ifl :el LA . 07 A Z.. I V'. ' •1 11-11. g A i RI la ■-•1 g 1 S +.... ,Z7 Z Z g '7C Y z , ,.. ,..... , . _,.., _. ____...... _.„. . 1 r• 4.,:i, '..,, ' . -• '---,.. :7,--5,,,,i A - :.'\Ns . •••'. / .1 ,,,. I I\ ,,, . 1 , 1.50 / \ .. r.:, : l- , \ : 'i',' Ig \,)\(,,! \ ,. . ', ', .. , ,, -...:•z, t , ill , ( \\- \:\ \ \\\ . , ,Icia , .. ..: .. . , T •,...„, ____,,_ ::._.. , _ ' 1 .,'IL ...,';,',.... —.- - --. ,:-.,-.:, • . ' _,.. . _ i , , , . .. ,'. . 4 P. . i .... ,.., L. (., ''''''' .\..NN ' r: 1 ''.1 ..:--- 1' "--- .■■--... ... It ,... P- -I, s,,I \ '',....„..._ .J11((i 11 J.:i (.,, .,,1 ...17._ _ _ _ ...:.. ._ _ ,.: _ 7 .'■,1..,,r,. ., , .•:. .. ,:: _, ::.: '1 47 '' .--;.i. /7) ti ) . i t .4. , • , . L• - . . / ''.‹...e.....„., , r _ ... . ,. .c.,. . 11 i) Ili , ix---, ,: ll'...-1-_--..-.-/- I , — - . -- - -- .- - / ...- ... ., / - „..-- t „:-.,.:,if Ift (, i. -:, (i.rr•__------- — —'1 - --. '- - . - , , 4- - -, c...-... i CD'. -... ___,......7-; _ _j., i , c I ■---- 81 / er1 + .,)Y . I ..., ■ :4 ., „.., C......_. _._ . .. T --• .0... . .... 11 g. .11: ' Sa- .'; 1 k ..- 1L- --i--., ' - - ' .S)P"PS4 .-4 '.II:- 1 •-- .1 9*00 '- .: .. i., . j 1 I 11 61 '. 0\\'').11' l' ''l ' 7 4. j 6'f‘tM4 '''''' '' ...."."''it 3 '''' . . ' .... -■,L.... 4----A--- I --Kw' " ■ i%-\\,- -Ft-'-'.- -" 4:.7: . j1 :;tI . :111 .-- . I I, 1 'r. 11 ' ' ' . •,' 6 ' ''111. I:. a ) ------- . ) . r, f•, . 8, ; pi • r ' - 0 '" gi- i 1 400 f.. . I litie+00 ilk tr. oil: = i / ' (11 I I t i 1 i ■ 4 i At% ;top 44/3 ii. (•: il, , . . P . : " I 11,11/11 Ili . I' l' \,\ \\\71c"---71--. _ \,.. ' 11 ‘'' P','• . , ol , . . , M o rn IT ll' '..' 'rl '\'\',:f0 .. -\-. ,,, 1 ,..>0..z.4., \I'1 1*, ) •, ,. ill ' • evo,,...< . ___- II' 11*-1--- -;--- cp L t .., J.' 11 I , , .i, i t/) ifillillh1/(in ' - . 4 I 4 ..,... 1 ' ,,,ct.. , „,. .„. ....§.... syi 7- ;:i . 7C ;I:•■ Iti r, -, .. 0 171 2: 0 ...-1 •:. 1 I 1 i ' . c) aq NI 4 5 ....._:;. ,..... V , .;•• 4i ....i $ z t-P,m E .. , I , I ''''' .-- 711 0"__ A .A QPX ■ , . \ ‘ i ,.., A- I -„,-... • -7-er \ I N / — ;<.,-7 .' , --, / 1 --„,„, ) g ' 4- ' k 1 I / IN:,;( IP .._ / V' . ..„, ,.- A.. --_; 11 , , . -e's. ...,-- .,_ /1 4 is _ _ I , _ — „ , „ „ . . , _, , . i ,1 ) q 2 - - , L 111111p, SA :2- - r73. , I ,,IP .,,_ ., i,' ; 1 R.n 1 6'.. ' C ' .,..1( ',, '' ' lr'; A *-'t _ '- / .' ; I , , , 1 ,' ; ,' E 2 i - -----' -.0, . i i . ' t I , . , I ; 1 ; ; , , , „.„----.,,, / / ;'s1 - ---) ..-----/t , ---_ .. I ... .1 ,,-.,/ 4 16 II 4: I '; I I ' _-_ \_ . Ii.., 1 14,..1, :..\/,..„.1 • ____,.....:1 i -- ... I: 1 5 1 0 , 1 i . , -- ; ; .. . --- .,;,; 0 4 fl , / .____)\- \ , r"-A 7--1.------ -----________----_-- —. — - - I I i 1 .- L- .10 i4.,. \ *VW fr- +■ . - \ 4-- - .6. 4.. .41 I , H , N. . r''''cC) ` IIir..: ----- ( 4 1 1 1 1, n ig ../7 1 ...e i 1 0 01 t 1 I ; r-m 1 r% I I ' . ( -p „..-----• r ,.<- , , , , Eli ygli , 1 ,..- r , s . F ,n ' .. .-- 44 i$ell .) i x, r1 .--- , / ;„7 . . / , Ft Ftrill 110! ci .77 Gt 0 -.* Q P ,... , '" i /0 0 1 z z g 1* , 5,riV-i \ 0) 71 1 I. +00 ..... -, i • \'..,. r...) ...... .... I , i , 1 .... .., - - i 73 2gla z -2', Z t= 0 NCL NOANIONS • - i 'or.4 • , 1 " .>: f • • ; i 1; ;I I ,)//i//IV I .,. ] IN. . N. 1 . I . I '. ... \ \ I \ . . . .. .. .. , , • '.% .' .... '..-P , T , 1 i , , ,.„ ... J.- ,- I ■ i - --.,-.,--... .-,, II I i ill if/4/2 71 i 1,/ I ',),, I :11 ' , s'''- _,, ' •' i" ; '' ' 44 .' 1 f;-.44,h. ' : --..„ fl .\\, A 1 > VI' I 1 ' 1)0 ' fili i t i ti ,,' - - FR r71 1.. j1q1 _ I i ,- I)0 \-. I ; ; i i Ili/ ))111I '' MI ) ; ' td1 fit I I ' 0 N.7..271 I Am ..‹ f, m . / , .',,:' 7' A.,,,,, de i ; ...--c ( ; ^' . 2 I i - ; , ----, . '-'7 )1 /I FE 5 1 il, 11 / S '4'--".... )4:' --., ,, I, 1 1'1 • ir , - -- -, ...,„ 0 , I ,, i ,,i, . !lia a ' l' i .' r I ,, Ili - "-- I q ;g - ..) \N\i,\1\1 \\,,, (iliffQ, fq iiri. 1 5.`"---.;‘-; L ( i ' - Itt . „I ,/ 1% </:\ 1 : -.4, filll:ci . !1,-i — ,..., . I I -''''''' / rn rn —I :Op$ 4 th,„, A i V a ! o , -- - -- ,,..,._. i„ ,... - if s , / , ... :11,1:1,11ii• ii:: 11,_9 II il I ) ) ) ' ' '- !,110?":1i,!?: 1 .q II) ,41,, ;\\ `,, I (11 i , , < , ii I il,,, - 1 s'.4,-; ; 0 1 !il 1 li i ■.. I J /I , "21. ' 111 II ' ru \ \ is,\,..., , ... s,......--- ,,,...,,/r/if,../ ,'— i =-.. feli 1 i 91111' ' - s j . j - \ Vir\ - I \\,..._ .......---1,..j/ • t it el: ;1110 '. , t' 1:; r''1 \ 1 1 , ) IIIII i '. \i, k <" -0';'1 \e ' i —---:, ---- -'77/.':: . , _ . .- / 4 i ,. A h: 1 r .r. --1\._\_1 ? ),/ii --/. :(/://::" ... . .. .- . , ,. -. - "-‘. ___ . ; , _ II ) 11 CA /------1 --//:,./ '. 01 • - (-----\;\\ 0, \) / / .1 6%4 ../711., ,, .... „/".„.f.,....: li‘ . ii -----,,,::::_____?„.„/„ r- \ i ,,,,,'Y. ir 7,7,,-- - - -.... c--_ ..„- ? / z,...„-) , / ,i/ , ...„- ....„ s• 0//'" 7 1 (4741 1 i, ,--''' i''''- / . . , . . T 7 , / , . ,,' 1 7 ,,72,/, . .. . . .,,..// • / , ..,•• ,...i.", 7 \ ..• , „•,• / ...„- . ..,„ , ,,,/"...;<, ..-- . . .• -..,.. / -7 / ,r1"---,,, j ''eri 00 i ..__, _-4 01 •, . -- I / i i i -1. \ M - - ---- - - ----. I er' III . 0 , / if 1 i i ',\''),... .\`‘,.'s'",,, -■,, , T I : ■ , , .,„...__...,.-.., , \ ; N NJ ' -' . -,-. ...„. ......_...--- __, .; ..,. ; - r .. ..---) " .. ‘..../ ----.., ..., , . .,. . ,...- ., .-.........; 1 1 1 1 t,4 ... 0) IIII-V. -L- - 1 lia z I--, k . X FC r., '-1 — 1 1> fr .!-,,j: 71 Gr ! . = 1 e 0 4. I-11 .3 IiE -: •-- v .to 1 E ^ - . ).:. ,. . , — \ • ‘... ...,. _, _ \ \ N.. , 1 - \ - _ ,.. I ''.1 1 :., 'i-2 1 \ 1 Z 0 6 ,- -4 7 .r.: ■ , — I.1 ::. \ , Z Z 0 0 ____, \ , \ \ \ 1 \ al T 1 m _1 <m I m V-I . , 0 : t At Y 91 1 ..:-,:, , , ' Q M ■ 1 ,., ac -----j i i 0 1 i 1: ''' A. < A i 1 Z I --I 8 II m-T1 0 ..; i-_, ,• m ..,, , , I . . ,- , J I ■ 0 --- i m M 8 S , ,1 _- _. ---• ...... i i z .5_ ----- , \ 77") .‹...... i ---- , :-, .., ..... i r.-... ..k. - . _ „,.. 0-, m :::. A: .-f I - w ! 13 Al 73 > 7;m 0 .... In 5 + ,..- ril a C • I Fm ftel- , _ 8 6 1 I 14 I' 1 mm r I I I a z ' -,T 6-1 1 -4 -..:...." .,i-'. I i Ili li,31 = r- 1 it —.J. A ! I r J • - i •-•• _ ._____ I -1 1 ..../..17 M n xi -1 .• ...., g 0 , . . .:4. 0 .,. "71 -.. No N..) + NJ 8 . _ .... 41 T.1 a X 0 0 I '1 I M .--.• .77 ot,,.ik ,110 1 -0,It• ..r. — :=--: - :-.i • j1 ›,r-- _ -..-- - ,.• --- - g ..... 1 I 1 , ! —.....■•■.,..- —.I al I 23 m g 'El p 13 (TI -I z -4 o 1.165 o) to to m o z , 11 0 J F A Z P ii 37_ am , :.,. M g II ..,, '4 ,,4 L :I '41 m T -, Q OP 7171, t i , =.■ '' 3z. r-— m 0 Z M . Z.1 X II D c? al °..4 i,Vt Zmt0 1 0 E m 0 CI . _. -t-rr P 40 k.- 0 -e m 0 CI 0 ". ' --a.. - -p 1. /-1 ir/ M r- R -< X 'A+ -1' • e is, -'-. \ 11 ---.' :44%.*Z. n *o -Vrei: \\• 'N \\.. .. s\s's '• :C Z ," 44:++ +k ,/, / / "\ ,1445414V%,4.4 ''4, +apir % 1— - . ..„ .0. ...,_.- .• • % 40r. 116 41 lifieratikir+.4,4%.„1.eA0-i4iXt — - _. 12 %IN:Alter.Vttr, iirolViCt..Y*.7-Vt• 7.„ 72 -n 2 g u■ Nt**64•40'. 4674t4,44.44t4401k4 744;41.4 23 — +4,10.+.11 16% 01 akiV311'.:p7,.4,-*-i14,1 4 vnfle41, +4,101Z4i&gif_i 1 o) xi 0,- 0 5 i b 8 siie.s•r• • .0,, 0 o 7 '71 e , X1 / 44+. 1 ‘11,+.4 16 s /1 In i 1 I C 4-4- ..-.. As\ ' N. v7 N.,,, 107.1 . i m z - ..... ...„. / 4 f/e V.ri. (11--- 'r- - to 0 to ,N, II , I ,------*- l',,,,,,,:‘ ', 1 ., ' "it" ,,r ,''' • "TA '''" .4 '41 ' --- 0 0 8 3r2.. -‹ > *. I. „ 1-1 1 CI N . r 1. -• z .-- -_,4,- -^-,s s • 1 ID 2 31. A 2 t rn F 0 - '. - , • o 4 8, ›c W 0 rn r- .i-i' 4 P T 2 : . II , , 1 I m —H.r 0- CI • .• I x Q. 13.0 m t '• 0 t 1 1 1 + . I ,. Jr , --oe c,, ,.2. , 4 m -0 01 I r",.."' - ' . 'lir 11 ' 1 4 ), ..... 0 •A p , ._ .. 1- H II N m , .. .1, _1_,J,,, 620• r- < i , — - , ill -1 -4 II ,‘",,,-. ' ' ; ' ;': I 3. 3 — i t 111 01 0 ll'I 0 DID m 2 m c d , v .,,,k-,,,,,\., iv .„.„„....__, :,,,,x, „, >5%,,s.:, .4....__----------: 1 co w .4.4. - "''' , ',,- ' Z ii it i M ,nri c-rj i n 1 0 R tior4+.4, 1 ..,,,~ 4•1'c / :/ \\\ -j,- x . ■ i .1 ,..- a- 5 qt41044; W 44".4 /1 g Ig -•••• -, 0 413 •pe', i-- ,i, +.414:464.4. ' , ' Z y,. 0 0 _ , .. C 4'4 ilCoZieli •etit • • .- . /1 r11 I Ve 0 „Ve ow& 1,40 • • . I §Y x Ur 6 2 1 0 W to ). . --, 73 to- --- -0 0 I m ill M .6 aod. r 1 0) E M 11 I 1 I I tri --I 0.- 7•-: tn < ›. U 0 Z I,) 1_1 .... _ • . 1 Cn ; m ..." 71 '-' .- . _ mCc2 ij 1 9 52 k..-, l,■g ,rTx-)..... - C. - gm ' R ---: t 1 I K. I. C a, 77.3 z 8 r-9.2 — 0 -I 0 :-.-: cl Ul L.; GI rn * ;0 a 2 4.: FT 8 z r, M 0 . > co (' m 0 0 0 M e ,.... o Y 33 § xp* _ 8 L-r• m no -n r711,. 0 om.._...„:". ie.; 0 )3 co 1.1 o i 8 2 \\ 1 m .:,.. m 7 M Ca FA ' if 0, e -i".1.4 ' ''a o 1.• m xl g g . ; , ;;;i -I I En __J 0 ,r; 0 --I ..-- I' _....— -0 rn 1 - -- -.-'. F 3:- ' -1- 9 2 2 ED C-) xi 1,4 o 1 > 0 0 -4 i Z Z 4. • ". — t"' :. . .-'1- 0.L. 1 - ' ------------ -4 11? - 0 ' A x 0 : .fi e-'5,3 ?'. 0 0 5", , g i q 0 ci. .., .:, ri , i —".4 '' ;', r , Z m > — Z o .- ." .—.„4.„ m I q 2 r- . ' --IF," CFI d p . > 1 '—— x m° ...1•11 016 f:. i ..° , —■_ .."''"'—"' ''...''..-te■J i 1 N. Ril . --4-1.—. i1„,3 zi:-!• r r- r- M 6*„...._. — c3-. -4 - 7,... m ve. 0 .. . •. ...: :.i . - • f P o 0 0 x.. x 0 -.-‹ T. -t z . o I"?-o F . m f 6 > › , ;—. -1 -0 —k z x z . ,., . . ., o± . 1 .. m „ 11 F113* W 0 rr- . • -ti m . > .. ' A . z 0 0 I---7.. 11 41 C ID ri c x -c 01 -1 () 17.; ) Xt -I -&-- -I r i , C) . c -, 0 .. --4 ri, , t I., -.: --- ?3 ll" > m g DI r-. 0) - s.; - ctti 3, _, in i t s 1-) IT '11 a• r- -- c:. 0 i ...or-3 !$ -i'l 3 . Ii r1 :i.• . X -I al 9 , > . c .. 1 - , — I m d ... • __ en Lu 73 e-r. L. -•." ._._--- • • .A. al al . > > ?3 . •. . -- ......-,- rn c•)< -0 rn 0 H i 1:,• ," ' '' ' fp-. m -I , > F• . A. ,Liz, .!....:1,:---t• • • , - co -4 r r . "IP ."4.‘-ie•--t . 111 2 0 M ' • rrl 111 I . ,,k.alb i...7ra,.;•ttlf. ,-:••,..,--w_ 41 5 .. . - • ' ■5'.. p ! awl ."#111). LP'...-Te^,.::17,,,t ------_.... ' • -- -_ ' :'L. -1 i 44 > ' • :. 44,), .f.;-','. . -:--..• - -I F C3 0 11 8 . 0 X,. ,„"ik'4-- • M M 1„„,.. .-, ;..7 ,,--- -1— F M T . — 5 — n n at z .0. 07 0 :, rn Ill m /<,/ IT1 , _4_ —I -ri . . . .__ 2 ) i _A as 0 Cr Cl) gt -T1 K.) IV • - ., — , • ,- , . .. 3 ,....- — .... g C.. • e".' ,r, . . CA Irn xi ,. . . m R 0- rn ID > — —• —. ... 0 1 r= G) I I I ':'-; iCf) M -NI , 75 1...1 Z Z Cli. ..2-,", • • • • . • • . ,,. ;tno -.- w 44,11,41 log gN o fl o � z i 1 § i (0 ‹ • te AtalE o 11111 CJ C-" LL_ 11_3 0 I W W I Y! I gy I. CO I`, R tili/111) . 1 f CU ? vt 4!Y x X f5 y 4 f't Y T I G C I S 1 � 1 ;. 1 i I !I WO 401 MI 1140110M11 04 IN co z 6 ;.-- i . co -,c E 11111 3 1;11 a. 8 .. - , NI NI LL c, I 0 4.0 (7) I 1— ) W W 2 PI i 00 aN I trx I 0 a■ I f . . .4- - Irtt 1 . 0 i vk . . x . . .., 0 . m 44 ■ ... I . . Ip., cc 0 . " .-. .4: . . i V I 1 . :2 Cr■ ... 7) Ca Ii II \) Ca. I cm I . Gi 1,21 I . .... I hi j--) ■'., . ., I ., I ...- 4 4 CI 40 040611R4 N © 4 CaQ � � a a • 11111 N U- \ss? I W W 4 E _ � rf t fr o, • ■ WO 'M '1111 SW IEJMO q1 — 1 K A" 1 ! a y Z C ; 6 co =IQ Wa z z o o to § thr ii / W o 5. nN N I 0 I-- w w CO I { ''''. I I r s I �r ¢ 1 co 1 2 � rn OJ , P X I , ;'' : is ( , v .. �. `.. ° OS Q C r a.•a ON 1W f u a X N i 8Eilkz K M E 1 8 co to`� C § fag fill a N LL 0 LO r F- LU Li CO 1 1 f., I I I , i Io 1 ! w , , f (11 . I N I . a I MA '«r WI sumo. or - — - a N g 4 ' " " $ Q N z n 15 6 ig cn � � tw of S §lF-�� CC V1 a 4 i 11111 -it $ N N 0 U) r- F-- W W CO 1 yc 1 t a , I M - i 1 6 P 1 u r t I it �t 2 ! u 1 Q c. ]..:I .LN lid 5W5Nb1 X C4 z 4 G g § K Z [6 F' 14. a i , p o 46 ig N U- • i I it • u 47 I . I � I � I c I � ' i 300 40 IMI 5106100 On r 3 rr olfflil)z O M St3' 8 � I I .0 v 1558 o Lu co • Iii • r. ,, ,n IJ i•1 W LLJ n • m J 1 e . 1� 1 J 1 I , 1 I t j� o o j g i 1 UG 1 ' a ° N I r I ` .: a o v.( v ( ;'7 It rt Al a #.Rl 41,0 WI 51411511144 qn IN 1 8 Mz t.4 g F ek. CO Z U7 1 111 e + n CV CI NCILL r if ,,-.= H T— W W . f 2 i J , r C1 1 a .„7 C.,1 ) ' . ilC 1 1 9 y J t C.'` I J f i 1 /f fi ■ F Loll M WI 41461AN fls v. ziJ0111. „..., icil < 1M1 g w cou) a Elie Y U d , (.'+N N I1 CJ V— r E— W W I co 1 Y 1 4 ♦�7 / t r' � I it ;, .„.:j; .,< 1M r,..1 CD c 1 . A 6 /f1\ 4a. f n M 49 u1 q. + G • 0 n, • tn c • I -, / 1 / 1/ 1 ,,, I II I _� 4. 4 f O .. 1 ........... .i / fil U i; f.; 1 u 1 1.1 r a 1 ir,. .. L I O r,r u; M1 '^ O v1 4, I rn . m -4 N Q m N) NJ 9 r flu1 I -i El i ? "I=. hi. 2 91' >- z Go _ a � `F' o Q A Yy oterim5 OR. MP. Olin A f r I I • ri I 4 u r ut A V 0 V I I tis IIryry o VJ 2 m 4. m N 0 m b o 7. (41 • )• m F. .0 Oeiteltal siT OM OAR RS M m a a M °° 0 ' 1 4 3 3 3 P S ri t ^ r N m .2i . -44 r 3 w e o 0 o c P i` g a 3 E a ¢ a 3 ; a i m 3 3 3 3 - e 7x1• < d < o u x x _ e 6z" _ _ e ,1 ,2 ° , 3 i Y i i ' 1 e v ` m m § , c E i c m E Y i a n C a n 2 G G ; ; o a 5 J x 3 d o Y E Y i 3 . m i, " i " i 9 i x m e 5 8 3 v i e s F a i 1 3 3 3 3 S r z r c a 3 a i z 2 P n 3 q f f f 3 f E E f f f E . . m m m m n 0 r r Y • m A' AA AA m AA ., ^ AA 7, 1A - . f f x i x f 1 F x F 1 f x I f x x i x -. 2 i -. i `o . Z. !, 1 • x 2 x x x 3 r r 5 - r r x x f x x x x f -, f E f eS. °a u p • x x _l x .l _l x x x Z a - = = 2 .a x - x Z _l x t f E x f f = = 5 S -. 2 = x 2 = 2 S 1F `° 3 5 5 5 _ d8 ;. 88a = zSa 8 ;, 8 ;, S K E u ° 5 3 5 3 3 • a S S a 3 0 3 0 3 S - - _ > = > > 1 _ > 1 .z _ o ra 7 S co 7 3 W 2 A N StSrSBa = r i8 8d8z v 8 a .E 3 0 3 5 3 3 a a 5 5 3 3 5 3 5 5 3 5 CO '-I N C L Is 6 S O 2 5 C w 2 2Z Vy 1 I [ L r .e. .1-• O N N V el 8 i F r CG N a, N _ Y _ 5 < 1 �' 3 O 0 m s En° i P m . n n f c f.' 3 i W u 3 - u o O g e _ V E 7 2 2 E 55o L Nm• m m o m . m m o ° . 4 m m : m m m m 'o m m f o CC a ++ - 8 E _ ' F ] w x �t"a s_ F 9 E _ - ° - V O y n A . m p r Z 3 E -g x' c z 8 li a c S' E a v 'i ; in > E x E ; „ a° i 0 o E R ° a G = 4 : u (•n -� ¢ V •Q w 2 Q Y Y Y U Y 8 T "' ' g °- = 7 E .] c C 8 • s , Eia > _ m ° g U" a e x n z' °n Y - °e O LE E E ¢ m m z $ W N O a r V t7 U d ' 8 i_ = 2 e 2 2 r r r .. n r r A m e A e e A A Y ° 0 m m w4s�N �� r� JEFFERSON COUNTY ti p.4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 Is NG,tO 360/379-4450 . 800/831-2678 .360/379-4451 Fax Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. /// NAME: Y �.�C7 �c�ryC, (i/�s lAdt cILd / v- -S /�f /� �^ MAILING ADORESS: // / -ll/ 2 ( I 9A), Pb 3`+1 n. c,�{� C�� [ mom VU _/�53Y � TELEPHONE: (HOME) ( (WORK( J go 1 "- Q (p 3 y y REPRESENTATIVE: Pet-e--V-5 MAILING ADDRESS: m'C- 4-"S ALIO d TELEPHONE: (HOME) (WORK) DIRECTIONS 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity,showing the fol nwina information: a. Vicinity sketch; 1 L��C E O C�V/7 E b. North arrow and scale; c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; ,J d. Means of ingress and egress; e. Property/lot drainage; JUN 1 7 2013 f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; g. Location of utility easements; and h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. JEFFERSON COUNTY 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. . DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 1 • Property Description 1 � General Location: 0050 U.rAfl! %; 5/ /- 1'/�-1lI 4_ 1/'ill/10v !✓/' Legal Description(from Property Tax Statement): ' 1 Qf,JAl vtvp 27 N; I�,- ,.e- 2- L_) / SCE=i��` - 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): 3-5 20 2--. I OO • Total Acreage: 7 a5--- - Zone: %Lot Coverage: Applicant: V Owner ❑ Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser ❑ Other • Project Description -i t p rn;ec f i s -11) y-ee. D a S 5 a# bv�✓w r ovt `����t a+ Do5e IAA ltf s S 1 P4'14c a A4d- SaDv - 'Ifv(6-1 o repla� -t4to ca �rl✓-e�- - s gem 10 N ;o otti Lk L i o o 0015172,14- et 5Ft- ,/a(Q. t c an al la 7 D Ft- h a�+ �r . ' Property Owner(name and mailing address): J 117t,:1 e- Pte(16$ _ec t°cti 77�y� ,iii Ts gd S.A)J 1>v 3oA 40,6S-V t dlyfu(fr- Ui/ 9i4coY-Z65---) • Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. ‘-PC+(/'(" ( DOWNER SIGNATURE) (DA E) PRE-APR CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 2 PRE13-00016 Pre-application Conference Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Fish Passage Improvements Attendees: Deborah Petersen, State Parks Representative; Doug Hinton, Parks Manager; Rob Kirkwood, Parks Engineer; Mike Hankinson, Southwest Region Parks Planner; Amy Stonkus, Wild Fish Conservancy; Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County DCD. Meeting Date/Time/Location: August 1, 2013/11:00/Dosewallips State Park Owner/Applicant: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of Proposal: The proposal is to improve fish passage on Twana Creek at Dosewallips State Park and to restore stream habitat. The project will replace two culverts with a 20-foot-long by 30-foot-wide steel bridge and will construct a 50-foot-wide floodplain and a 1,270- foot-long channel. The Jefferson County Code (JCC) is available on-line at http://www.codepublishinq.com/. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Land Use: • Zoned — Parks and Recreation • SEPA (WAC 197-11)—Submit SEPA decision. Critical Areas: • Geologically hazardous areas (seismic hazards, intermediate shoreline slope stability)— The JCC requires a geotechnical report be submitted for construction of a publicly-owned facility in a seismic hazard and for development in intermediate areas. Submit a geotechnical report prepared by a licensed engineer or geologist, as per Chapter 18.22 JCC Article V (Geologically Hazardous Areas) and Article VIII (Special Reports). • Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (Type F waterbody) — Proposal will be constructed Twana Creek, which has a 150-foot buffer. Submit a Habitat Management Plan (HMP) prepared by a qualified professional based on Chapter 18.22 JCC Article VI (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas) and Article VIII (Special Reports). • Flood Hazards—Application is subject to the flood damage prevention requirements in Chapter 15.15 JCC and Jefferson County Code Interpretation (dated September 22, 2011). Project must be designed to meet flood requirements in JCC and must meet federal Endangered Species Act requirements. Either of the following must be submitted to address federally-listed species: (1) if applying for Corps permit, submit a copy of a Biological Evaluation or(2) if not applying for a Corps permit, submit a Habitat Assessment based on the 2011 FEMA Guidance Document. • Aquifer Recharge Areas (Susceptible) — Proposal is not expected to affect aquifer recharge. • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (Coastal) — Proposal is not expected to affect SIPZ. Application and Fees: • Complete Application Includes: o Master Permit Application o SEPA Threshold Determination o JARPA o Site Plan o Proposal Drawings and Details (also include 11"X17" sheets of proposal) o Geotech Report o Habitat Management Plan o Habitat Assessment (or Biological Evaluation) o Stormwater Calculation Worksheet o Fees due at the time of application -$228 (consistency review). • A building permit will be needed for this application. Building fees are in addition to those listed above. Bridge must be engineered or designed to meet Forest Service standards. • Septic review will be needed for this application. Septic fees are in addition to those listed above. Environmental Health is not likely to approve placement of a berm over the drainfields. OTHER REGULATORY/LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS • The project must comply with the Shoreline Management Act and receive approval from Washington Department of Ecology. • The proposal will be reviewed by state agencies and tribes. • This project may not need a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This agency has jurisdiction over waters of the U.S., including wetlands. The Corps contact is Karen Urelius (Seattle District/Regulatory). S 2 40 I LAS? t11111(c���, ` '•f d ; ,..1. /.. . ,ei M/J/) • t :% --- ,• g, t • I 11A ". _ f '— - SETBACK BERN ` / -: •E� ROCK I fr , f :a: ra. N ■• ••....•x,. = 10 s • .% S •▪ / • :w� 3 r 4 �� n •::::::-.:Y:--..--•• : ''1') r r ?:' :'j=:i •y•}?;.••..fi: r:• ......... 40-14z...., ye,„.... .... ; :.•:ti•:::•:. ^. h • • e ., :• ...,:„ . ......„......„,...........„.„......„.... ...,.... .. „......„........„:„...„.,......::::::.„......: .., ,.;.,....,.._„ sch.... . . . ...c.,. ......,,,......_......:.....:,:„../.:: • • • ( •. riir •t: ^ o kk "Pr . ) N t itiN -:;:': -:-.-i.-1.1:::::-.::::::----;:1-1i::::-:--. • \ t I\J I .\ .%% •*; ...P.ostfiff::::::., 1 \-"\.(.:\'' \\-----.\---1,. \-/- • 1 • . • ---\---\\\\\\w %Xi" • ...,..."::......-. ..:)....-.7......:::-:::.-.7.-..::::.: • '•. . ':::::: k :rte•: :: .r�.r - - / j. -. :4 :•:r; 1,000 2,000 Feet 500 ��' `�� Jefferson County D C D Invoice No. 13-093 1 621 Sheridan Street .,,-4.4--.. ...„ Port Townsend, WA 98368 ti?e,,t���� (360) 379-4450 fax (360)379-4451 INVOICE Date 6/19/2013 Name WA State Parks Attn: Deborah Petersen MLA# Addre 1111 Israel Rd SW PO Box 42650 MLA# A1-Li& City Olympia WA 98504-2650 Case# PRE13-016 Phone Qty Description Unit Price TOTAL 1 DCD Pre-Application Conference $259.00 $259.00 Dosewallips State Parks -Twana Creek Restoration Please Mail to: 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please Make Payable to: Jefferson County US DOLLARS SubTotal $259.00 Payment Details 0 Cash 0 Check 0 Outstanding TOTAL I $259.00 Name Check# Office Use Only Receipt# Department of Community Development DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR PRE13-00016 Date Time Co} ments to I - A-'JUL -LA-AD '2( P.1' 9,,i ..I 1l tidemark\datalfomis\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt June 24,2013 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#PRE13-00016 Review Type Project Description PRE13-00016 TWANA CREEK RESORATION PROJECT Primary: STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR Site Address: PO BOX 47014 306992 HWY 101 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 BRINNON WA, 98320 REP DEBORAH PETERSEN 1111 ISRAEL RD SW PO BOX 42650 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2650 Project Location: Parcel Number 502 021 001, Lot 4 & 5, in Section 2, Township 25 North, Range 2 West, WM, Locate at 306975 Highway 101,Brinnon, WA 98320 Parcel Number: 502021001 S-T-R: 2-25N-02W Total Acreage 103 Legal Description S2 T25 R2W LOT 4& 5 (LESS TAX 28), S1/2 NW NW SW& Land Use: 7500 TL TAX B 37.000H Flood District: Fire District: 4 Planning Area: 11 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 46 Zoning: p1 COMP PLAN n DESIGNATION: a,l/l `t'Vt4e,V COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map (Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property Y NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NfL [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES N� [ ] Designated Ag YES NO [ ] Shoreline Designation: �'Tr�c, NS , e-r [ ] Shoreline Slope Stabili : YES NO Stream Type: 4 NO Fish& Wildli :el: NO Wetlands: YES NC)„, Rare Plants:YES NO Seismic: YES NO Landslide: YES NO Flood: YES NO Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Mm Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other I 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s)& Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 1.) Wetland Delineation BLD08-00487 Wetland delineation report on file. See 3/24/09 Report Lasertische or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 2.) Geotechnical Report BLD08-00487 Geotechnical report on file. See Laserfische 3/24/09 or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 3.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 Buffers 5/30/13 CAO Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 4.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 5/30/13 Other Associated CASES status issued finaled description 502021001 BLD94-00806 F 11/21/1994 4/16/1997 wildlife viewing platform SEP00-00248 F 6/13/2002 5/7/2002 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River FPA2612055 F 10/26/2012 10/29/2012 10-acre uneven-aged salvage timber harvest. MLA01-00481 BLD01-00516 F 12/12/2001 6/18/2002 VAULT TOILET MLA04-00356 SDP04-00022 F 7/12/2004 Dosewallips State Parks Estuary Restoration Project. The proposal is to remove an existing dilapidated fence that has been damaged by the elements. The proposal has already undergone SEPA review,with Washington State Parks acting as the lead agency. A threshold determination of non-significance was issued om June 8,2004. MLA05-00327 BLD05-00345 F 8/18/2005 3/15/2007 REPLACE VAULT TOILET BLDG W/NEW BLDG- BIGGER FOOTPRINT, SAME PLACE-DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK MLA06-00353 SDP06-00023 F 6/30/2006 Streamlined Fish habitat enhancement project-remove a portion of a levee and install six engineered log jams MLA07-00005 SDP07-00001 A 2/13/2007 Install and maintain a real-time stream gage on the Dosewallips River. MLA07-00241 SDP07-00035 A 7/31/2008 APPROVED FOR EXTENSION-Lower Dosewallips Fish Enhancement and Restoration Project MLA08-00467 PRJ08-00137 P SEP09-00001 A 2/27/2009 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-holding tank for new visitors center. info for RV dump station and drainfield filed to SEP80-295 BLD08-00486 F 3/2/2009 7/13/2009 DEMO EXISTING WELCOME CENTER AT DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK BLD08-00487 I 3/9/2009 NEW WELCOME CENTER AT DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK(replaces old) FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MLA09-00109 BLD09-00099 F 4/20/2009 7/29/2009 3 SETS OF STEPS FOR PARK MODEL HOMES&ADA RAMP FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MLA09-00129 SDP09-00033 A 4/22/2009 Streamlined Fish Enhancement Projects-Dosewallips River- Removal of levee/berm and revegetate floodplain. MLA10-00139 PRJ10-00141 P DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARKS WATER SYSTEM SDP10-00048 A 10/14/2010 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARKS WASTE WATER SYSTEM- The Washington State Parks& Recreation Commission plans to replace the existing wastewater treatment system as part of the State of Washington Clean Water Initiative. Waste water at the Dosewallips State Park is currently treated in eleven septic tank/drainfield systems. Much of the Park is within a floodplain and subject to seasonally high groundwater. Subsequently, Hood Canal water quality may be negatively impacted. The initial construction will include an on-site collection system at the Park,conveyance through subsurface pipe and construction of a treatment/disposal system on the 20 acre former Jorgensen property on Church Road. The treatment system will utilize waste water treatment processes capable of producing"Class A" reusable water. The selected system will have little or no odor and noise. The treatment facility will be enclosed within a walled and roofed structure to further reduce any potential for noise and odor impacts. Given the size and current heavily forested condition of the property, it is anticipated that adjacent property owners will not be subjected to any visual,noise or odor impacts. The treatment facility property is currently zoned Rural Residential 1:5 and it is anticipated that the facility will have less impact on noise,odor,existing vegetation and traffic than if it was developed into five acre residential parcels. This project requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Conditional Use Permit for a utility in a Conservancy Shoreline Designation,a Type II Conditional Administrative"C(a)"Use Permit for a Minor Utility in the Parks&Recreation and Rural Village Center zones, and a Type II Conditional Discretionary"C(d)" Use Permit for a wastewater treatment facility in a Rural Residential Zone. These permits will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2),requiring a Hearing Examiner's Decision. A final SEPA determination issued by State Parks acting as lead agency,a Hydraulic Project Approval issued by Fish&Wildlife,and final shoreline approval by the Department of Ecology are also required. A public hearing will be scheduled and noticed after the end of the 30 day shoreline comment period. ZON 10-00052 A 10/14/2010 CONDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY"C(d)"USE for a wastewater treatment facility in a rural residential zone. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP 10-00048. 'I LA 10-00139* ZON10-00051 A 11/4/2010 CONDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE USE"C(a)" for a minor utility(sewer lines)in the Parks&Recreation and Rural Village Center zones. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP10-00048. BLD10-00379 A 1/3/2011 STORMWATER PERMIT-for Phase I collection system within the Park PRE08-00027 M 7/29/2008 Washinton State Parks proposes to install three convenience cabins in the higher elevations of the existing campground and a Welcome Center. PRE08-00042 F 1/14/2009 Installation of a sewer collection system within Dosewallips State Park for future connection to a waste water treatment facility. The treatment facility will not be located within the park boundary. PRE13-00016 P TWANA CREEK RESORATION PROJECT CAR00-00478 F 1/14/2002 Vault Toilet SOM00-00248 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River SEP01-00140 C 8/26/2002 Dosewallips State Park. System Designed for RV waste only case sent to archive 6/10/2013 SOM05-00105 F SEP05-00105 F 8/10/2005 1/22/2007 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-VAULT TOILET-western most on west side of 101 SEP75-00496 F 10/7/1975 10/7/1975 filed to SEP79-288. Dosewallips State Park Ranger Residence- W of HWY 101 at south end of park SOM79-00288 FIN DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 PRJ11-00187 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 SEP79-00288 F 5/17/1979 5/17/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 info from SEP75-496 filed here SOM79-00289 FIN DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. PRJ11-00186 r F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. SEP79-00289 F 7/13/1979 7/13/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. SOM79-00290 FIN serves sp 71-80,west of HWY 101 PRJ12-00010 F serves sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 SEP79-00290 F 6/11/1979 6/11/1979 serves sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 SOM80-00295 FIN serves the RV dump station on west side of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center PRJ12-00009 F serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center SEP80-00295 F 11/2/1979 11/2/1979 serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center SOM81-00204 FIN Dosewallips state park, serves camp circle sp 31-40,to NE of south comfort station. PRJ11-00185 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station SEP81-00204 F 4/23/1981 9/1/2011 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station SOM11-01072 NFD Sanitary Survey only,no permit records located. Serves public bathrooms East of HWY 101 and south of Dosewallips River 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR MLA14-00011 Date Time Co nments -�-[5 I.o-h me, i n 1 February 10,2014 \\tidemark\data\forms\R_M LT_Case_CRM LA.rpt UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#MLA14-00011 Review Type Project Description BLD14-00044 Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construct 50 ft wide flood plain and 1270 ft long channel PRJ14-00008 Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construst 50 ft wid flood plain and 1270 ft long channel Primary: STATE OF WASHINGTON-DNR Site Address: PO BOX 42650 HWY 101 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2650 BRINNON WA, 98320 APL ARNY STONKUS WILD FISH CONSERVANCY 5621 PALATINE AVE N Project Location: Parcel Number: 502 021 001, Site Address: HWY 101 Brinnon Wa, S-T-R: 2-25N-2W Parcel Number: 502021001 S-T-R: 2-25N-02W Total Acreage 103 Legal Description S2 T25 R2W LOT 4 & 5 (LESS TAX 28), S1/2 NW NW SW& Land Use: 7500 TL TAX B 37.00CH Flood District: Fire District: 4 Planning Area: 11 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 46 Zoning: pp COMP PLANf� DESIGNATION: Tav . � h" �5 t YPA ^ inais I JJI KPorfQr"itkit/ COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the puperty lines as identified on theAssessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YyFS- NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES N� [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES N51- [ ] Designated Ag YES No [ ] Shoreline Designation: ✓ NO .jai . LAL 1NL ../ [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability:: E¢' No nte,f YY)C� Stream Typeir NO n S FWHCA: ar NO -45 • ','tyert Vvl.c) Wetlands: YES NO Rare Plants:YES NFL Seismic: Cj'" NO Landslide: YES NO Flood: 6 ,,st. Erosion: YES N.,9- Recharge Area: NO SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk a CMZ: nsm — High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Archaeology: YES NO [ ] No Shooting Zone: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YES NO MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other • [ 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 • Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: Road Approach: EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 1.) Wetland Delineation BLD08-00487 Wetland delineation report on file. See 3/24/09 Report Laserfische or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 2.) Geotechnical Report BLD08-00487 Geotechnical report on file. See Laserfische 3/24/09 or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 3.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 Buffers 5/30/13 CAO Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 4.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 5/30/13 Other Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 5.) Wetland Delineation BLD08-00487 Wetland delineation report on file. See 3/24/09 Report Laserfische or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 6.) Geotechnical Report BLD08-00487 Geotechnical report on file. See Laserfische 3/24/09 or MLA08-00467 for document Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 7.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 Buffers 5/30/13 CAO Parcel tags found for parcel 502021001 8.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-02-13 5/30/13 Other Associated CASES status issued finaled description 502021001 BLD94-00806 F 11/21/1994 4/16/1997 wildlife viewing platform SEP00-00248 F 6/13/2002 5/7/2002 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River FPA2612055 F 10/26/2012 10/29/2012 10-acre uneven-aged salvage timber harvest MLA01-00481 BLD01-00516 F 12/12/2001 6/18/2002 VAULT TOILET MLA04-00356 7/12/2004 Dosewallips State Parks Estuary Restoration Project The SDP04-00022 F proposal is to remove an existing dilapidated fence that has been damaged by the elements The proposal has already undergone SEPA review,with Washington State Parks acting as the lead agency. A threshold determination of non-significance was issued om June 8,2004. MLA05-00327 BLD05-00345 F 8/18/2005 3/15/2007 REPLACE VAULT TOILET BLDG W/NEW BLDG- BIGGER FOOTPRINT, SAME PLACE-DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK MLA06-00353 SDP06 00023 F 6/30/2006 Streamlined Fish habitat enhancement project-remove a portion of a levee and install six engineered log jams MLA07-00005 2/13/2007 Install and maintain a real-time stream gage on the Dosewallips SDP07 00001 F River. MLA07-00241 7/31/2008 APPROVED FOR EXTENSION-Lower Dosewallips Fish SDP07 00035 F Enhancement and Restoration Project MLA08-00467 PRJ08-00137 P SEP09-00001 A 2/27/2009 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-holding tank for new visitors center. info for RV dump station and drainfield filed to SEP80-295 BLD08-00486 F 3/2/2009 7/13/2009 DEMO EXISTING WELCOME CENTERAT DOSEWALLIPS STATE BLD08-00487 I 3/9/2009 NEW WELCOME CENTER AT DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK(replaces old) FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MLA09-00109 BLD09-00099 F 4/20/2009 7/29/2009 3SETTS OF STEPS FOR PARK MODEL HOMES&ADA 3S FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MLA09-00129 4/22/2009 Streamlined Fish Enhancement Projects-Dosewallips River- SDP09 00033 A Removal of levee/berm and revegetate floodplain. MLA10-00139 PRJ10-00141 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARKS WATER SYSTEM P SDP10-00048 A 10/14/2010 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARKS WASTE WATER SYSTEM- The Washington State Parks&Recreation Commission plans to replace the existing wastewater treatment system as part of the State of Washington Clean Water Initiative. Waste water at the Dosewallips State Park is currently treated in eleven septic tank/drainfield systems. Much of the Park is within a floodplain and subject to seasonally high groundwater. Subsequently, Hood Canal water quality may be negatively impacted The initial construction will include an on-site collection system at the Park, conveyance through subsurface pipe and construction of a treatment/disposal system on the 20 acre former Jorgensen property on Church Road. The treatment system will utilize waste water treatment processes capable of producing"Class A" reusable water. The selected system will have little or no odor and noise. The treatment facility will be enclosed within a walled and roofed structure to further reduce any potential for noise and odor impacts. Given the size and current heavily forested condition of the property,it is anticipated that adjacent property owners will not be subjected to any visual,noise or odor impacts. The treatment facility property is currently zoned Rural Residential 1:5 and it is anticipated that the facility will have less impact on noise,odor,existing vegetation and traffic than if it was developed into five acre residential parcels This project requires a Type III Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for a Conditional Use Permit for a utility in a Conservancy Shoreline Designation,a Type II Conditional Administrative"C(a)"Use Permit for a Minor Utility in the Parks&Recreation and Rural Village Center zones,and a Type II Conditional Discretionary"C(d)"Use Permit for a wastewater treatment facility in a Rural Residential Zone These permits will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2),requiring a Hearing Examiner's Decision. A fmal SEPA determination issued by State Parks acting as lead agency,a Hydraulic Project Approval issued by Fish&Wildlife,and fmal shoreline approval by the Department of Ecology are also required. A public hearing will be scheduled and noticed after the end of the 30 day shoreline comment period. ZON10-00052 A 10/14/2010 CONDITIONAL DISCRETIONARY"C(d)"USE for a wastewater treatment facility in a rural residential zone This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP 10-00048. MLA10-00139* ZON10-00051 A 11/4/2010 CONDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE USE "C(a)" for a minor utility(sewer lines)in the Parks&Recreation and Rural Village Center zones. This permit will be processed under the Optional Consolidated Permit Processing provisions in JCC 18.40.030(2). See SDP10-00048. BLD10-00379 A 1/3/2011 STORMWATER PERMIT-for Phase I collection system within the Park MLA14-00011 BLD14-00044 P Replace two culverts with pre-fab bridge. Construct 50 ft wide flood plain and 1270 ft long channel PRJ 14-00008 P Replace two culverts with prefab bridge. Construst 50 ft wid flood plain and 1270 ft long channel PRE08-00027 M 7/29/2008 Washinton State Parks proposes to install three convenience cabins in the higher elevations of the existing campground and aWelcome Center. PRE08-00042 F 1/14/2009 Installation of a sewer collection system within Dosewallips State Park for future connection to a waste water treatment facility. The treatment facility will not be located within the park boundary. PRE13-00016 M 8/2/2013 TWANA CREEK RESORATION PROJECT CAR00-00478 P 1/14/2002 Vault Toilet SOM00-00248 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves VAULT TOILET on E side of HWY 101 & just south of Dosewallips River SEP01-00140 C 8/26/2002 Dosewallips State Park. System Designed for RV waste only case sent to archive 6/10/2013 SOM05-00105 F SE P05-00105 F 8/10/2005 1/22/2007 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-VAULT TOILET-western most on west side of 101 SEP75-00496 F 10/7/1975 10/7/1975 filed to SEP79-288.Dosewallips State Park Ran ger Residence- W of HWY 101 at south end of park SOM79-00288 FIN DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves the Rangers residence at south end on W of HWY 101 PRJ11-00187 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK- serves the Rangers residence at south endonWofHWY101 SEP79-00288 F 5/17/1979 5/17/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK serves the Rangers residence at south end onWofHWY 101 info from SEP75-496 filed here SOM79-00289 FIN DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort station W of HWY 101. PRJ11-00186 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves southern comfort ry station W of HWY 101. SEP79-00289 F 7/13/1979 7/13/1979 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-sery es southern comfort station W of HWY 101. SOM79-00290 FIN sery es sp 71 80,west of HWY 101 PRJ12-00010 F sery es sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 SEP79-00290 F 6/11/1979 6/11/1979 sery es sp 71-80 on west side of HWY 101 SOM80-00295 FIN sery es the RV dump station on west side of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center PRJ12-00009 F serves the RV dump west of Hwy 101 near Visitor Center es the R west of H SEP80-00295 F ]1/2/1979 11/2/1979 Dosewallips state park serves camlp circle sp 31-40,to NE of SOM81-00204 FIN south comfort station V PRJ11 00185 F DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station SEP81-00204 F 4/23/1981 9/1/2011 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK-serves camp circle sp 31-40 to the NE of south comfort station SOM11-01072 NFD Sanitary Survey only,no permit records located. Serves public bathrooms East of HWY 101 and south of Dosewallips River