Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2005-00059
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: FRED P NASON DONA 0 NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 DATE ISSUED:April 15,2008 DATE EXPIRES:April 15,2013 MLA NUMBER: MLA05-00737 PROJECT PLANNER:Zoe Ann Lamp PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 CONDITIONS: 1.) At the time of building permit application the applicant shall submit all necessary documents to meet the requirements for a Development Permit within a Frequently Flooded Area (JCC 15.15.070). Application for a development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the development review division of the Department of Community Development for Jefferson County and may include, but not be limited to, plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities, and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required: (i) Elevation in relation to mean sea level of the lowest floor(including basement) of all structures recorded on a current elevation certificate (FF 81-31) with Section B completed by the local official; (ii) Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed; (iii) Certification by a licensed land surveyor that the floodproofing methods for any nonresidential structure meet floodproofing criteria in JCC 15.15.080(2)(b); P 9 (iv) Description of the extent to which a watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. 2.) Flood hazard reduction measures are to be used as required by the Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15). 3.) Construction Materials and Methods of Construction to Reduce Flood Hazard (i) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. (ii)All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. (iii) Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Locating such equipment below the base flood elevation may cause annual flood insurance premiums to be increased. 4.) New construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated one foot or more above the base flood elevation (BFE). 5.) Fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that are subject to flooding are prohibited unless designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or must meet or exceed the following criteria: a. A minimum of two openings having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided. b. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade. c. Openings may be equipt with screens, louvers, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater. 6.) Prior to final building inspection, proponent shall provide the department with an original "finished" construction" flood elevation certificate that has been verified by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information in the state of Washington. The certificate shall certify the completed structure was constructed at least 1 ft. above base flood elevation. 7.) Utilities shall be designed as specified in 15.15.080(c) of Jefferson County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 07-0515-06 (Jefferson County Code Chapter 15.15)which states: (i)All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; (ii) Water wells shall be located on high ground that is not in the floodway; (iii) New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters; (iv) Onsite waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. 8.) All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. Electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities shall be designed and/or otherwise elevated or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. Locating such equipment below the base flood elevation may cause annual flood insurance premiums to be increased. 9.) Where elevation data is not available either through the Flood Insurance Study, FIRM, or from another authoritative source (JCC 15.15.070(3)(b)), applications for building permits shall be reviewed to assure that proposed construction will be reasonably safe from flooding. The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data, high water marks, photographs of past flooding, etc., where available. Failure to elevate at least two feet above the highest adjacent grade in these zones may result in higher insurance rates. 10.) This SPAAD is vested under the Shoreline Management Master Program adopted March 7, 1989. 11.) The road approach is approved for its LOCATION ONLY as approved under ZON05-00059. This approval is valid for a period of 5 years from the date ZON05-00059 was approved. A ROAD APPROACH PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED. Proponent shall contact the Public Works Department at 360-385-9160 prior to any land disturbing activity for installation of the road approach to obtain an approved permit. Once the permit is issued it will be valid for one (1)year. The Applicant shall adhere to any conditions as set forth in the approach permit. 12.) PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT THE HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN SHALL BE FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND AN AS-BUILT DRAWING OF THE PLANTINGS AND BIRD BOX LOCATIONS PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. A COMPLETE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN REPORT IS FILED IN MLA05-00737 AT THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 13.) THE PROJECT BIOLOGIST MUST FLAG OR STAKE THE 65-FOOT REDUCED WETLAND BUFFER AND A SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE OUTER EDGE OF THE BUFFER. 14.) PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONTACTED TO REVIEW THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE SILT FENCE. CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION AFTER THE SILT FENCE HAS BEEN INSTALLED AT 360-379-4450 TO SCHEDULE THE VERIFICATION. 15.) BIRD BOXES INSTALLED IN THE REDUCED WETLAND BUFFER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SPECIFIED IN APPENDIX F OF THE REVISED REPORT RECEIVED MARCH 21, 2008. INSTALLATION OF ANY BIRD BOXES THAT DEVIATE FROM THOSE SPECIFICATIONS AND HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO BE USED BY NON-NATIVE BIRDS ARE PROHIBITED IN THE REDUCED BUFFER. 16.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 17.) VOLUNTARY MEASURES OF COASTAL & AT RISK SIPZ: Water conservation measures: 1. Roof and other intercepted precipitation shall be routed to on-site detention ponds and/or other approved means and allowed to be released to the soil slowly. 2. Water collected from Storm water and roof catchments may be used for watering lawns and gardens. Unless catchment water has been treated to meet drinking water standards, there shall be no cross connections allowed between the potable supply and impounded water. 3. Water withdrawn from wells on each property shall not be used for watering of lawns and/or gardens. 4. Ground water withdrawn from each property shall be restricted to a rate of three (3) gallons per minute. 5. Installation of water conserving fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets and shower restrictors and other water saving plumbing fixtures. 6. Landscaping plan (xeriscaping, native vegetation with minimal amounts of irrigation). Please NOTE that the above listed measures are not intended to be exhaustive, but rather is intended to be illustrative of the types of water conservation measures. 18.) MANDATORY MEASURES FOR COASTAL SIPZ: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water or an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: a. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. 19.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs)and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 20.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 21.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an autormobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requriements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stred in a critical area. 22.) A minimum of two (2)on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 23.) Duration of Approval-Several of the included findings shall become conditions upon the submittal of a building and septic permit. The duration of approval of the Site Plan shall be effective for five(5) years from the date of original approval by the Administrator. If a building permit has not been issued within the five (5)year period, the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) cannot be revived or extended except by new application that must meet all the existing criteria and conditions listed in this Section. Knowledge of the expiration date shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The county will not provide notification prior to expiration. Limitations of Approval -Approval of the site plan shall not guarantee the performance of specific site features or improvements (e.g. wells, septic systems, stormwater drainage facilities, etc.) and shall not be immune from changes in state or federal law which are enacted or have an effective date after the date of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) and which may affect the performance and implementation of the site plan and associated use or activity. Any subsequent land division or boundary line adjustment of a parcel or lot which has received site plan approval advance determination under this Article VII, JCC 18.40 shall void such site plan approval and require a new site plan approval advance determination application. Approval of a site plan under this section does not constitute authority to commence any development or building activity until such time as final authorizing permits are issued (e.g., septic, wells, stormwater management, or building permit, etc.). Modification to an approved site plan may be required by the applicant and approved by the Administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions. (Please request a copy of Article VII, JCC 18.40 of the UDC for criteria pertaining to modifications). 24.) The applicant shall apply for a Shoreline Exemption at the time of a building permit application. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on Januar) 30, 2006 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Brant Wintering Areas, Dabbler Wintering Area, Coastal Salt Marshes Salt Meadows And Brackish Marshes, Oak Bay Shorebird Foraging, Seismic Hazard Area, Frequently Flooded Area, Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area (SUSC), Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone(SIPZ). 3.) The following comments from the Jefferson County Department of Public Works were submitted on February 14, 2008. On February 15, 2008 the below comments were forwarded to Fred and Judy Nason (property owner), Rosemary and Charles Law(interested buyer), Nancy Woffenden and Tanya Royer(Real Estate Agents for these parties). COMMENTS: "The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed residential development of Parcel#962700108 at 181 Portage Way under Jefferson County Site Plan Approval Advance Determination ZON05-00059. The Department has the following comments regarding the continued access to the site. Portage Way County Road provides access to the site and to Lower Oak Bay County Park. The road segment adjacent to the site is subject to periodic damage when storm waves and high tides over-top the riprap bulkhead that protects the road and deposit gravel and drift wood. The road surface has been damaged by upward water pressure from high tides and storm surges. Currently, the Public Works Department removes debris from the roadway after storm events. However, the time it takes to accomplish this varies depending on the severity of the storm event, damage to other County Roads, and the availability of maintenance crews and equipment. Because of this situation, Lower Oak Bay County Park is closed to over-night use from October 31 to May 1. The structural integrity of the riprap protecting Portage Way has been compromised by storms in recent years. It is anticipated that this will continue in the future. The frequency and severity of this damage may be exacerbated by anticipated sea level rise. Due to financial constraints the Public Works Department does not plan to repair the bulkhead. Due to environmental constraints the Department may not be able to obtain the various local, State, and Federal permits required to repair the bulkhead in the future." 4.) Portions of the subject parcel are mapped in a frequently flooded area. The FEMA FIRM (Flood Insurance Rate Map) 530069 0190B dated July 19, 1982 indicates portions of the parcel are within flood Zone A. Zone A is defined as"Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined." On October 30, 2007, staff mailed copies of the FEMA FIRM to Fred and Judy Nason (property owner), Rosemary and Charles Law(interested buyer), Nancy Woffenden and Tanya Royer(Real Estate Agents for these parties). 5.) A Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers dated March 21, 2008 was submitted on April 3, 2008 to address the Category I wetland, wetland buffer reduction and proposed single-family residential development. A complete report is filed in MLA05-00737 at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 6.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 7.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 8.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses (2)All Commercial Uses (3)All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 9.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 10.) After reviewing Jefferson County GIS mapping and conducting an investigative site inspection staff determined the mapped Type 3 Stream is not located on the subject parcel. 11.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir (Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis), Shore Pine (Pinus contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata), and Western Hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). • Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple (Acer circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana), Cascara (Rhamnus purshiana), Pacific Willow(Salix lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Salix scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) Salal (Gaultheria shallon), Ocean Spray (Holodiscus discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes sanguineum), Wild Rose(Rosa nutkana), Swamp Rose (Rosa pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus), Evergreen Huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium). 12.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 13.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polio (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 14.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 15.) The revised site plan as submitted on March 4, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated April 14, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 16.) This approval is for a Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 17.) The parcel has been designated as Rural Residential 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 18.) The proposal was reviewed against the site plan determination criteria of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.40 Article VII. (Site Plan Approval Advance Determinations). The criteria for approval are as follows: 1. The proposed site plan conforms to all applicable county, state and federal, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including, but not limited to the following: (a)The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (b)The provisions of this code, including any incorporated standards. Staff comment: The application was reviewed for consistency under the provisions of the Unified Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The application was found in compliance with all ordinances pertaining to the proposed development. 2. Adequate provisions for utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed site plan have been demonstrated, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, and other public ways, potable water, sewage disposal, fire flow and other improvements. Staff comment: The parcel totals approximately .84 acre in size and the revised site plan as submitted on Marct 4, 2008 and stamped approved on April 14, 2008 complies with JCC 18.30.050, Table 6-1: Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health commented on the application March 25, 2008 by stating "will sign off on the SPAAD based on the site plan recvd March 4th 2008 . . . and receipt of the recorded easement." The applicant has applied fora septic permit(SEP06-00180). PUD#1 (Quimper Water System --State ID Number 05783U) is proposed to provide potable water to this location. The applicant shall provide proof of potable water at the time of building permit application. This application does not vest the parcel for potable water. Access to this parcel is provided by Portage Way (C575609). The Public Works Public Works added the following condition to the SPAAD, "The road approach is approved for its LOCATION ONLY as approved under ZON05-00059. This approval is valid for a period of 5 years from the date ZON05-00059 was approved. A ROAD APPROACH PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED. Proponent shall contact the Public Works Department at 360-385-9160 prior to any land disturbing activity for installation of the road approach to obtain an approved permit. Once the permit is issued it will be valid for one (1) year. The Applicant shall adhere to any conditions as set forth in the approach permit." An address of 181 Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA has been assigned to the parcel. The approved site plan has not been reviewed for stormwater requirements. Sections 18.30.060 and 18.30.07C of the Jefferson County Code requires the project applicant prepare a stormwater plan in compliance with the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction, to address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. A stormwater plan shall be submitted at the time of a building permit application. The SPAAD was not reviewed for fire flow. However, the parcel is located within a state approved water system. Jefferson County has no specific adopted fire flow requirements for utilization in permitting. Application of Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) fire flow requirements for individual projects is inappropriate since the primary purpose is for water system design to assure adequate pipe size, source, and storage. 3. The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) implementing provisions contained within this chapter and Chapter 43.21C RCW. Staff comment: Single-family residences are EXEMPT from the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) identifies the construction of any residential structure of four (4) dwelling units. 4. Approving the proposed site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Staff comment: The proposal will not affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local,state, and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA,any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are induded as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline,or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat,all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings,utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters(streams, rivers,lakes,marine waters),or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development,especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking,"even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at(206)526-6613,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503)231-6121. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. S< /Admi istrator {{ MLA05-00737 7 of 7 r- . , � c'. 1s . 0 P oz 1 0 °z o c o vR zcn o cn -+o oz = p �P -1 Vy (� cm °gm *IO 000 z v D o G O O Oq om °m0 co ,P 0 o xi v op C z -0 m O■ 6:1(» Z mZm xi -[mF z z ° -< 4 ao oo � �N on S� �8 93 r S Nwe Z9 ��O D ,tj--� cn 8 '01 5 O� z� O �� no� g i z m0Kmz w W P P• cy � 00= 70- ; u) CO (T in --P, n i$Z10 46W * m u)v mO7)m0v owo co co o w () 6z t., iZ �> CC0� DOZz)={ ElEcn 0 >� z 0 C -I -l0 ,crm 2:r.) zvc* m 4Mz-711 I f �� CD mr- �� mcp r- ormcnC xn�s z WI 0 •∎%. kititil�* v D `i �� ^'°RT'y 2 D 06 0 o o Tl ��,,' 3Oe oo,33, o* m �m � z � z a 0 ,�,� co I Oo `��` �� rho • ,� ,♦ z� �� cD � ��,��.� O m m - mn (�!) ` •• '� • 4k- N z 0m = � 4 ♦ O _ mzz ..:_..m-0 =I v --1 0 ,,� • z , mm1 ��� 4 . lel���� - c) o 1 �� 0 d Z till z hi_ o* M oT'7 ° zz0 M <10A, 00, > o 0 79' 00', t - i xi 4-6,7, m ° v) 0 Fri m (./3 u ? �' m ow I OT. 0 �. �_ -0 rnvv b D m �� 0 co o z or (n -c moo m o APR - 3 2008 _rr�T REVISED REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON March 21, 2008 FOR FRED NASON GEOENGINEERS /j ' File No. /6338-001-00 APR - 3 2008 Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan File No. 16338-001-00 March 21 , 2008 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard, Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. • Jos- Senior Biologist Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAB:jI ORCH\1611 6338001\001Finals11633800100RevisedHMP R.doc Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright©2008 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No.16338-001-00 i r APR - 3 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 Wildlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 10 CONTINGENCY PLAN 11 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 File Na. 16338-001-00 Page i GEOENGINEERS 21,2008 S f ■ TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) APR - 3 2008 Page No. List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B—SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C—BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D—PLANTING DETAILS APPENDIX E—SPECIES LISTINGS APPENDIX F—WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS File No. 16338-001-00 Page e[ GEOENGINEERSO Afarch 21,2008 1 � t REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APR - 3 2008 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON FOR rar_ FRED NASON INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock,Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest '/o of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 65 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence,invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement plan for the site is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Page 1 March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERS; 1 i APR - 3 2008 documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species. .- =1af j This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USFWS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003); and File Na 16338-001-00 Page 2 GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 1 I APR - 3 2008 ,' 1 • the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1975 and 2001). J1_� •GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife, tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types (Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List— Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site (Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003)and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GEOENGINEERSO March 21,2008 r r APR - 32008 examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR _ 1 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered and threatened species,critical habitat, candidate species and species of concern for this project. _ Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act(ESA) as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging along the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. File No.16338-001-00 Page 4 GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 f 1 , 1 iI APR - 3 2008 Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). - However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat on the eastern side of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map (2007) of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments,there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branta bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay (WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri) along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding. File Na. 16338-001-00 Page GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S2 Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra),Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimbleberry (Rubus parvflorus) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea (Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritime). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corms brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore, not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs (tracks,nests,etc) and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented presence within the literature as described above in the PHS. File No.16338-001-00 Page 6 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S ( 1 � r APR - 3 200;. DISCUSSION PROPOSED PROJECT �T A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 65 feet with a five foot sideyard setback. After construction, the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way, therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces,such as roads,rooftops and driveways,cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 7 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S� APR - 3 2008 Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation(Himalayan blackberry,poison hemlock and stinging nettle) will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table (Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C — Buffer Enhancement Plan and Planting Specifications is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species, planting specifications and schematic, as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 8 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S r � r � a r Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting Common Scientific On-Center Estimated Name Name Spacing(feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 31 menziesii Hooker's willow Salo(hookeriana 6 1 gallon 43 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 74 parviflorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 43 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 43 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 8 racemosa Indian plum Oemleria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasifonnis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munition Dune grass Elymus mollis 3 Plugs 307 Plants will be installed according to specifications outlined in Appendix C. A Mulch ring will be placed around the drip line of each plant and soils will be amended if needed. Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds, small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. Bird boxes will be installed on existing trees and/or on individual pedestals installed within the enhanced buffer. The Site Development Plan in Appendix B illustrates the proposed location of bird boxes. Bird box specifications should follow guidelines established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife located at their website http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/backyard/nest- mat design.htm and the attached publication Nest Boxes for Birds in the WDFW Urban Wildlife Series (Appendix F). TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. APR - 3 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 9 March 21,2008 GEOENGINEER� = dh MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. An as-built report will be developed and submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation by someone with expertise in native plants. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will be conducted by an individual with native plant expertise and will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. Yearly Monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted to the county by October 31 of each monitoring year. GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site (Table 2). The term"recruitment" as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data will be recorded in the form of an as-built report. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique (using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event,other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris, and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. APR - 3 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 10 GEOENGINEERS.0 March 21,2008 CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above, will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. CONCLUSIONS This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals._ _ File No. 16338-001-00 Page 11 3 March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERS) REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853.2005. 50 CFR Part 226. Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311.2005. 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout. Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 185. 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol. 72,No. 91. Desbonnet,A., P. Pogue,V. Lee, and N. Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island. 71pp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas. (Accessed April 25, 2007) Jefferson County.2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.iefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25,2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia, Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. http://www.nwr.noaa.iov/ESA-Sal mon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/Index.cfm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture.2001.Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area,Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/technical/soils/hvdric lists/hvdsoil-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. http://wetland sfws.er.uses.Qov/wtlnds/launch.htm 1 (Accessed April 25,2007) 1, APR - 8 2008 File No. 16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 Sg 1 1 R R United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candidate Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County.Revised December 20,2005. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland,Washington; 1:24000, 7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990.Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. httn://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29R01E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources.2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August 1,2006. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/contact/wnhptrs.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) File No.16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGINEERSO March 11,2008 Ferry St Fe-rySt m m P • e IS j I T }v 3 k N E °t = a a c U C,; a a ,1 O e S 49, a` k9o�n isiada� ,�C�0 R Old Fe w.::.; d. `4, o. Laurel St = - " etc ==_: `'l C, 1 Alcohol Loop Rd�F\ag\et pd Dun1aP or F/awe F,C a� o O 4 "S Flagler Rd ��� Fir-Ave- O -a m c Site o 2 i '- e Washington Ln. °"le s. c r x Oak Rd i Olympic NP E m 5t Iri {0'I ti-t_ E. 90 2,000 0 2.009 ■ S wN r E'' Mown Rainier NP et VIClnity Map r m Notes. a 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 181 Portage Way H M P A 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to • Port Hadiock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the 5 accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E RS Figure 1 8 is sow stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will se as the g i 8 official record oth this communication. -- t rr 2- pssa Ks ; I I i _. ,. ///,—.ETEhVUSN. e...a z1� 1 s A. ,t s °'° ✓!l' f ,. µ ^' r' Z . ,F 41\i ,,, „ Ufa. E. { ■( Iii ,# � + /. _m 4P y 4 . - rq ° � „a . EiuBL ti 4 V r. „a�.,n.- 1. « ;, { x. '�' " � is . t Oak Bay/Puget Sound 1 i., \ k ri 41 t. r x • ■ eK. • i ,i 4 I roil s r. a PUBHH o ( d 1 . . . . m 500 0 500 N in site Boundary Feet . Wetlands o ° NWI Map 0 Notes- 181 Portage Way HMP n I.The locations of all features shown are approximate. g y u 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file (j EO E N G I N E E R S� g 1., Figure 2 is stored by GeoEngineers. Inc. and will serve as the �,i t 0 official record oth this communication. ED lb eo ala r$ 1 ES 0 y J R 1 111) . O N n 6 f y . t rc m x .. Fg .........(___ ,, ,,, ,. ,:, a E o. o Td -Tidal Marsh in Site 5°0 0 500 " tO Co -Coastal Beaches W Nw F s Bk - Belfast silt loam C3 Soils Feet Ei CIC -Cathcart gravelly silt loam c HuC - Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map cii HvC - Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way HMP s WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy loam Port Hadlock, Washington a Notes: .:....—... c 1 The locations of all features shown are approximate j e 2.This drawing is tar ures mason purposes. It is intended to O E N G 1 N E E R 5 /, j assist in showing features Inc.dcan in an attached Figure 3 $ document. GecEngineers,In.can not guarantee the APR - 3 L � iE accuracy end content of electronic files. i GEOENGINEERS / y //18 Ili/ ///,/ ENDIX A SITE PHOTGAPHS /i/1/ //////ji/1/11/1 '''''':///11////)/1/21,1 /I/// ( III 7 i ( 1 '\\\\ k APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS • Photograph 1 Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest �. xJA v F Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern portion of Mature vegetation to the west of the site the site APh File No. 16338-001-00 Page A-1 GEOENGINEER December 14,2007 S s Y y Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site ww Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal APR - File No. 16338-001-00 Page A-2 C December 14,2007 FOENGINEER 4 , GEOENGINEERS ��� / 1 ( ) i /1„// illi// // /ill/8/ l' APPENDIX B SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ro.,/ f / / / al 1,V,y, !,' ///////,//11#9{/1 r i I( \ \\,, \\\� N` m C S. c a A a° a F a =L E 3 ° o a)Y T) m 8 W .: D a 2 Z Q -. y —aa = hi Q W Y Z ,! O Y 0 N .t o w < Q n 0 2 W- a m W > d 1 io z&z L_ V w $ d0w 0 m O IA Y Y w a0 W V V rial 2 m w g O W a m O i i w 1- . 5 3 a 6l a Y O W'7 V Z Z O i� N. 4a,„2 "I- QQ 2 u mFZ o_ , �OS °e EA cQ i- ■ O.W F I�I I I , ° O ��z ''4 fffffff‘4s amw Y a '�• I II�I1. 1--3 WO 3 4S•••� ia� �, o>o viaa Lt / C,� , x O =GO lgb, ` *w,1 �� Q o z 3 J OO• W N Z £ .° ,W G F O V W a E e` . y,o ° , / O E O "5 O 8 s In 61.2g E-pm -.G ' Ozn.� m m_ v m J 'o m ill'_. c > i...__— �. .�_.. P E w$ $ .F 't i !1 gF.; 0 APR — 3 2008 ' ;€ g oftgaw ao/iz/so. .. me:vro `5*L n000gss/NiavO\oo\L00ess9 i\.d\HOHO GEOENGINEERS / li I // 1,1 // i 11/ /ill il e el el die II/ APPENDIX C /////' /1////' // ////////, BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN r pr//,,/ I, 61K Il O 1/109#/ / � 1J I( , ,l/r 7/I//I! 1 \\ „ • . ORCH\P:\16338001\00\CAD\1633800100.dwg GJA:BIAK 03/21/08 P y"y Z 11: " I I ///_\\\\mss o p Q 0 o3..g 0k— Zcnz cn—,° ozx z a ji tt2 Z0 O*� DSO 000 z 9/ r oRc 21 a"mN (no �Zm z7o'l <C z = DI!! r V Ill 114 I s 3 Itugritlihill ! v m d E w w a c j - ----._, l I R m 3 in i i. m F.°-'of m m Y Y IN : : : s s p O a Ear o A A 11 Sq M< A v00 O� �• r 07,, Artn 3'' OmD Ap O ° D -0 -I .0n 70?f m0 -1070C1-71 m rn r0 e° Z-9m13 AO�IP VmIC V O A m b. .4,W A W -• M 0 A r r -L-I UI m Z-H V ` , ►0� ��� N m > �� F� Z U m `�,,,, �ryORry 30 20633 Z y N o 0 lo • -1 v �,��R 00 On., z z >o u my Pm v z o D Sr co 0 Z ��\'��,\\ / b / ro z •A,/ .` 00 ° ��1ti ` mz OZ ,' �=4 O-1 4l ` m mmv <�O mo Iti 1 o Ln /^I = mm0 NIL(Y, �W z0� m o SO I v zm� Z co C UrH3 ocsn �i1 °e <'06 3 �mo� Z m 000. T ac , 8 00^ ` v) *S i.®II—_ _ y 1 0. O m 41 ii zi o 1'o 3l ;fj O> m O '. 0 O -0 ,J: 1 APR (, 1n T ZAA V! Ti V !'1r Il 3 200 -J i m C D 1^o rN*1 % O. j r mDm m M ! I m o O L 0 \ GEOENGINEERS \\ \ 1 1 \ \ \ , 1 I iii I I' iii APPENDIX D /1/71/7////`; PLANTING DETAILS O •/ f fi lii /// 1/7 (I / 1 VIII, il 111(1 1 • 1 ; r--- APR - 3 2008 . ..\, ..``- __ e . , . cc_, 0 Op K m Jy ic cc W Log d I ° 3 ~ 0 z°W a € a z ce LL mz� ` 5 5 i 0 3 3 _ No oa :9- C fi W a _Z Y. ;r.4- - r1.1• qo g 2 a W �+ w9 '�' I t0 0 aF s<<.. cc gEf,2S oga m § rn A•- _ Y « E z 6 I. S! •.P. ,,,!. .g:8,§Q,,,!. .g:8,§ 3 r z M d o. J 2 =j ZN JZ fAF 22 61 tt iil — o 2 Ni n Ni a * o co v D Z aE UZ O •O O O O O O O z " tO to to to Ni " to oc W O O O 0 O co O 0 C 0 N N Ca9 aU' 0 d < C¢7 •• •• R d 5 d s• O®® = = a •• • • • gw zg lg w 4 O •00 00• V lfl 3 u O 2 .v I • • • • •F��° cII g `., $ c t o ••• •OO• • M m FT, 5 t Y' 4 S 4 61 h o •0. 000• • 0 'E a2 TO Ca• • 0000 00 •0 S 9 0. "U'a■ T z omB I— Ili-€2 `O o:;m $z > w s" wCL N Z w -z w K O w O w a6a= E. 2 ,cn m a cn a UO - 0 a J W W o c'' U � vl a � 00 0 m , z . ''' a -- g - B D 2 w 0 0 0 p p E m m E O 0 0 0 3 w ^ p H O z 2 V1 K Z I ` w- e.-._.__ a` 'd A6 l �� a.„ O 0: a o` o •• • • • 0 :: • • t APR - 3 2008 E U . o r s.@ Z-(.., 1 80/1Z/£0 NWB:yP9 6.0 0'001008££91\09)00\1008££91\:d\H380 GEOENGINEER �� �1 I I/I// t APPENDIX E I SPECIES LISTINGS / /'. //lAyf/4* i ) ___ 7 I//7//it y, y ///1 ( /4(1, / , ,v, ;,,,„\\\\\„,:\ . \\\ \\. \\, 1 ,,\\\ ‘,. \.\\\\:„. \\\\\\ \ ,, ,----- -, , _ \‘‘,\,.,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,==, . , . _ _l t Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon& Steelhead Lpdut,d ffo,r-Thrt^r Current Species' Endangered ESA Listing Actions Species Act Under Review Listin Status 1 Snake River Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchvs � Ozel[e Lake Threatened nerka) 3 �..Baker River j Slot Warranted 4 Okanogan River Not Warranted 5 Lake Wenatchee Not Warranted -6..,..-� Quinalt l.xke Not Warranted 7 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted 8 Sacramento River Winter-run Enders•ered Chinook Salmon 9 ..Upper Columbia River Spring-run Endan rend (O.tshawyescha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened 11 Snake River Fall-run Threatened 12 _Puget Sound Threatened 13 Lower Columbia River Threatened 14 Upper Willamette River Threatened 15 Central Valley Spring-run Threatened 16 California Coastal Ilrrenrenwl 17 Central Valley Fall and Late Fall-run 112 Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Not Warranted 19 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 20 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring-run Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 23 I Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 Deschutes River summerifall-run Not Warranted 25 Central California Coast Endangered _ Coho Salmon 26 Southern OregorrNorthem California Threatened (O.kisutch) 27 Lower Columbia River Threatened • Critical habitat 28 Oregon Coast I Not Warranted 29 Southwest Washington Undetermined li 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Innenn 31 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run (0.keta) 33 Columbia River Threatened 34 I Puget SoundiStrait of Georgia Not Warranted 35 1 Pacific Coast Not Wart anmd 36 Southern California 37 Upper Columbia River Threatened 'I Steelhead 38 Central California Coast Threatened (O.mykiss) 39 South Central California Coast threatened Ott Snake River Basin Threatened I 41 Lower Columbia River Threatened I 42 California Central Valley ', Threatened 43 Upper Wilhunette River Threatened 44 Middle Columbia River Threatened 45 Northern California Threatened 46 Oregon Coast 1;tt i s:rz,.#'I 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted , 48 ! Olympic Peninsula I Not Warranted • Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound I Threatened • Protective Regulations., 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon 51 Fven-year hot Warranted (O gorhuvchro _ -.... 52 Odd-year Not Warranted 1 The ESA defines a"species"to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific salmon,NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Sigailvant Unit,or"ESU,"a"species"under the ESA.For Pacific steelhead,NOAA Fisheries has del' ' 'Population Segments- (DPSs)for consideration as"species'under the ESA. q I ; APR - 3 2008 GEOENGINEERS I M I iiiii t //1// lif� �,1� APPENDIX F WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS 4i ill( \ 1,1!Alt 117111117 7/0?,1,6#7 VIII1 11 1 7 till,/,/1111 ( , l' l 1�\:\.,\,'\.,,'\:\:.\\\"\\„:::::,":,"\\,,:,,''- 11 II APR - 3 200 ``ate` � I ,, 1 . +, at&4710114110liiik ,— . I_Z-`..- .::: .i. •CeN.‘"'"'.1'''t- - ., 1A,� a 1 1 1 1�.,�u r,i 1i,I t.t •t T1— ! •yy�..r�• `. ) I.'1,� . f , -. \\�1`,,i wIl \/,t7 ,i'0 ,7-7:7,-,,'J ___::� h. lM.l ' i 1/.� +1)1 r 1��'F y _•�` *WALL ...,..�.kL ti4l�lul ... .. ,`,_-4 f ._ t '1 t .. . ir■ rw ii t"'-�-i 110 t ' , y ' _`$y h1,Q�,�,,��++4'I * . It i rtt1 I�1` � �liwyrrr'q� I . �I,y� I1:11.:7'1,:f.:!..,.''',.,:.....,,'‘'''','R �`�2'Jf ��r� I 1 I , 1 r,.Yi!4•Ilr i'..,. {' I ,I ��+.�iii- I f_ � - r,— i}.tr'+�7N. I/.ry' ' 11 t��I/iI/ �yrt �1 I+ I` 4� 1 ' r-�Jl�`l�"'� ._... . F t ntl +l �� !1' i 1 y ' �t,t ,1' A N y �i Fj1 �- �' I 4.t1 1, . I 1 r I 1 S I ,t1 ♦ .' 11,-', , „, ,,4. --- •*. i`3 S J'4. il.•• I i �' r 1 \I 1 1,,:V :.� 0 '' . 4' l +\�t``" I' � 1 ,\-s. -- .fir L `Ikfr�S.,' f i ) 'ait, \ 1 I'M-. ' rq-.A. urt • +1 ( � ' ` d i _ „l!ril 'in 4 . • 4 a rP°. , I ! I � it { 4'..f j! k "" ' ! 1 •44 I( • "~ s ':Na VIsCe i {s Lt Is' 1 :g-�y`Yt � � li' ,I i k ,r ■ ,•ti,r1,k M, 1� ; , I I \tt .1 t , .�� • G.. a ! • 1•1 I I!: 1�� 4 i•' r.• '✓'x -,, v tI, .-,v• �� I!II r..._ �i 1 I (y— .�y"..�..-.,,..„...e, ./ I -` '{ • r"u'G�{♦ F t `,,O'' lJ'.. cs a+ S; jJrban Wildlife Series th'ashinglon Department of Wildlife 7 _ PEST -v- Q FO BIRDS As a tree dies, sections of it decay and make up f.-.'r natural homes that are lost when become hollow. These cavities are dry and too many trees in a bird's habitat are removed. warm, serving as secluded nurseries for many These cavity-nesting birds can, in turn, help young birds. In Washington, about 43 different you by eating insects that may harm your trees kinds of birds nest in holes in dead or dying and bushes. Being concerned about wildlife trees. Of these birds, 15 often occur in city also sho••:s good stewardship for our state's parks and around homes. The more common irreplaceable natural resources. ones are chickadees, nuthatches, flickers, This publication covcip, nest box building swallows and wrens. materials: designs, construrThr r nllid place-__ Putting up nest boxes can help these ment; pest proofing; tip$,on attracting birds to cavity-nesting birds. Your artificial nest helps your yard. and facts ebo1,t ccA ik-ne3te o8 { _ -J 2. u s2 Materials Design You can buy a bird house through special ENTRANCE HOLE: mail order suppliers, the National Audubon Design and construction of a bird house Society or local need to be bird specific. The most important garden and part of that bird house is the entrance hole. If nursery stores. the hole is too small, the desired bird won't be Or you can build able to enter. If it's too big (and this is more one following likely) undesirable wildlife —like house spar the guidelines t'i' ---=__� rows, starlings, squirrels and cats—can get in and plans in this " I and harm or evict the intended bird. publication. I } i-s•I'A. As a rule, house sparrows can't enter a Whether you 1 I x fi; nest box if the entrance hole is less than 1.25 buy it or build it, i ; l IV.'';-1 ti , inches in diameter. Starlings can't enter if the here are some ` ��� ��. hole is less than 1.75 Inches in diameter. The important things i i�Film entrance hole sizes in this publication are I tt� 1, : designed to exclude these pests wherever to keep in mind. , ,�t j ! p Wood is I �'v i I ! possible. the best material { ; IP ; to use for bird i 1 l` ROOF: �,I' ��N '�� houses. It's a - , y } ' Roofs need i good insulator, +1 to be built with :: t (',•• it's available and enough of a slant ( I , 1i I fly easy to use, and to shed water. The it blends in well with the landscape. Three- top front edge of the roof should overhang at quarter inch boards are the easiest to work least 3 inches to protect the entrance from with. Soft Wood, such as pine, is fine for driving rain or snow, and to keep cats from smaller nests, but cedar or redwood may be reaching in from above. used for larger boxes. If you use plywood, Provida a hinged side or roof so houses make sure it is exterior grade. A well-con- can be easily checked and cleaned out each structed house should last 10 to 15 years. year. (Annual cleaning reduces the possibility Use galvanized nails to build houses if of spreading parasites and diseases from year necessary, but remember that they loosen up to year.) Hinges should be rust-proof. Duck as wood expands and contracts in extreme and owl box roofs kept shut with a hook and weather conditions. Cedar and redwood nest eye can be opened by raccoons. It's much boxes should probably be made with concrete easier to use paired roofing nails with large coated or ring shank nails. These nails won't heads or duplex nails on the side of the roof allow the boards to loosen up. Screws also and the upper edge of a side. Wiring these work fine. nails together will keep the bird house shut and raccoon-proof. DO NOTuse wood treated with green preservative. The green copper-based preservative,when ex- posed to water,can produce poisonous vapors. DO NOT paint, stain or treat box with creosote. DO NOTuse tin cans, milk cartons or metal for nests. Metals quickly heat up to lethal temperatures on warm spring and summer days, overheating the eggs and killing the birds. Commercial plastic wood duck houses are also acceptable bul they should be placed in shady locations. . Y t 3. SIDES AND SEAMS: other species of birds arrive, put netting or wire Natural tree cavities have rough interior over the entrance hole. surfaces that give young birds traction, espe- cially when climbing out of the nest. A bird WHERE: house can mimic this rough surface below the The nest box should be somewhat entrance holes with grooves, cleats, hardware concealed, in partial shade and placed where cloth or a similar surface that can be gripped predators can't get to it. Check to be sure the by the bird's feet. birds have an adequate, clear flight path near Don't nail the sides to the top of the the entrance hole. If possible, the entrance floorboard. The sides of a bird house should should face away from the prevailing wind. It enclose the floorboard. This keeps rain from usually helps to put the box on a habitat edge: seeping into the crack between sides and floor between a group of trees and low-growing and then into the nest. Placing the floorboard bushes, or between bushes and an open 1.25 inches above the meadow, lawn or water. bottom of the sides All nest boxes should be firmly attached also keeps moisture ` to a support post or a tree. When attaching a from seeping in from nest box to a live tree, use lag screws and below. washers. These screws can be gradually All seams that loosened as years pass, allowing the tree to won't be open should o grow without any deformities. be water tight. Exterior \ p glue or caulking materi- HOW MANY: als work well for this. A good rule of thumb is to allow 1/4-acre between most bird houses. Because most VENTILATION birds are territorial, the average-sized yard will HOLES: probably only hold one nesting pair of a par- At least two 1/4- ticular species. Territory size varies among inch holes should be drilled near the top of the birds—house sparrows and tree swallows right and left sides of all bird boxes to let air require only several feet of space, robins need circulate. This is especially important for small less than half an acre, while chickadees and nest boxes. Drainage holes are also important. nuthatches usually need several acres. Other Drill at least four 1/4-inch drain holes in the birds, like purple martins and wood ducks, floor of the house. This will help drain moisture don't defend territories. That's why martin that manages to get inside. houses are the "apartment" type. Territories change from year to year, so a Placement well-designed and well-placed nest box will WHEN: eventually be used if birds you're trying to Some birds begin courtship and nesting attract are found in your neighborhood. If a activities as early as in courtship February, but and most sting nest box isn't used for some time, birds nesting select sites from late March through May. This nearby may be defending the area from other is also the time when most migrating birds birds of the same species. It may help to set return to Washington. Nest boxes can be set out several nest boxes (for certain species) in out as you notice new birds arriving. different places so birds can pick the best site. However, newly made bird houses need If you don't want house sparrows or European to be set out in winter to weather and air out. starlings to be your next tenants, be sure to take down unused houses after the desire d To prevent house sparrows and European birds have settled __ starlings from setting up house in them before � ' APR 3 'Mc. . . - 4. • • i ....... Y ..Y. ..v. x Pest Placing Placing nest boxes four to five feet off the J�i ;11 ground and in brushy areas will discourage Proofing �� 1 these pests. • Natural enemies I • • Iid if you want to get rid of house sparrows pose the greatest threat I I or European starlings that are nesting in a bird man- III house, it is legal to remove their nests and to birds using III I i i destroy the eggs. (Unlike most birds, these I made boxes. Metal I • • (,1 species are not protected by any state or poles used for mounts l federal law.) Nests may have to be removed or a sheet metal guard I r � � five to six times before sparrows or starlings encircling trees or )p i it' c finally abandon the house. wooden poles helps ���t I t/ Small animals, like mice, squirrels, bees protect birds from cats and wasps, may also decide to move into a and squirrels. Suspend- l(t, nest box. If you don't want them there, remove ing nest boxes from •b the nest to discourage them. wires beyond the `1•• When the nesting season is over, open jumping range of these /jr 1` an unseamed panel on the nest box and leave predators is also effec- 1/ \\ it that way throughout the winter. This prevents five. "1 f \\0 deer mice from using it as a winter home. Perches aren't *"" Otherwise these mice may "defend" their box really needed. If left on from returning songbirds in the spring by killing a nest box, perches will M+ and eating them if the birds enter "their" box. attract house sparrows I If raccoon are stealing eggs from a nest box, and starlings. The place one or two boards with the proper en- exception might be wood ducks. For them a trance hole drilled in them over the original slab of wood with the bark attached placed hole. This makes a short tunnel into the nest. horizontally under the entrance hole can make The raccoon's arm may still get into the box, landings easier. but it won't be able to bend it down to reach the House sparrows and European starlings eggs or chicks. usually won't nest within ten feet of the ground. 4. . ' Tips On A �acyin Birds ► r,,;,. a. m D • Plant native trees and shrubs for food and shelter 4:`*e ,;lil r ` 4 ;• Avoid using insecticide sprays whenever possible 0 ; • Lea v e g r ass an d b ush cuttings for nestin g material :'rd sp.. , •, ,4.�yr440 , • Provide clean water in shallow, gently sloping containers • Plant colorful wildflowers that will attract insects for birds to eat • Leave 1-inch to 4-inch lengths of string or yarn for nesting material • Set out chopped apples, raisins, prunes or oranges to entice fruit-eating birds APR 3 „v. • 5. Facts about Cavity-nesting Birds WOOD DUCK: Inhabits woodland streams and ponds during summer; not common in urban areas. Nest is a bare cavity, lined with down. Lays 8-10 while or creamy eggs. AMERICAN KESTREL: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;not common in urban areas. Nest is a shallow scrape in a cavity. Lays 4-5 mostly-white eggs. Eats rodents and insects. BARN OWL: Uses a variety of habitats. Nest is a shallow hollow in a cavity, Lays 4-7 white eggs. Eats rodents. SCREECH OWL:Widely distributed in forests,parks,orchards and woodlots. Nest is an unlined tree cavity. Lays 4-5 white eggs.'Eats rodents. NORTHERN FLICKER: Lives in open or sparsely wooded areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Lays 6-8 glossy while eggs. Eats insects,especially ants. HAIRY WOODPECKER: Inhabits mature woodlands, especially deciduous forests;uncommon in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Usually lays 4 glossy white eggs.Eats insects. DOWNY WOODPECKER: Inhabits open woodlands and natural parks; more common than hairy woodpecker in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually in dead wood. Lays 4-5 glossy-white eggs. Eats insects. VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW:Common in urban areas during the summer. Nest is a cup of dry grasses lined with feathers and line materials placed in a crevice in buildings,old woodpecker holes or bird houses. Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. TREE SWALLOW:Widely distributed in summer, usually near water. Less common than violet-green swallow in urban areas. Nest is a cup of grasses lined with feathers in a natural cavity,old woodpecker hole or a crevice in a building. Lays 4.6 while eggs. Eats flying insects. PURPLE MARTIN:Widely distributed in summer,in past near human settlements, but now rare in the state due to habitat losses and competition from house sparrows and starlings for nest sites. Nest is placed in crevices in rocks, trees or buildings,or in old woodpecker holes.Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. CHESTNUT-BACKED CHICKADEE: Inhabits coniferous forests. Nest is made of moss, with a cup of fur,feathers and fibers. Lays 6-7 white eggs,sometimes speckled. Eats insects in summer,seeds in winter. BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEE: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;common in urban areas. Nest and diet similar to chestnut-backed chickadee. Lays 6-8 white creamy eggs. RED-BREASTED NUTHATCH: Found in mixed forests; not common in urban areas. Nest is a cavity in dead wood, with a cup of grasses, rootlets and fur.Tree resin is smeared around the entrance hole. Lays 5-6 white or creamy eggs, usually speckled. Eats Insects and seeds. HOUSE WREN:Widely distributed in areas with shrubby cover;uncommon summer resident in urban areas. Nests in any cavity, including the pockets of pants hanging on a clothesline. Lays 6-8 white,finely speckled eggs. Eats insects. BEWICK'S WREN: Inhabits open woodlands and thickets. Nest is a bulky cup in any cavity. Lays 5-7 white eggs, often speckled. Eats insects. WESTERN BLUEBIRD:Inhabits woodland clearings and open areas; rare in urban areas. Nest is a slight cup in a cavity, made of dry grasses and a few feathers. Lays 4-6 blue eggs. Sutlers from loss of habitat and competition for nest sites from starlings. - , A 4 6. d'' .41111.11011111. 1 N N N CA L►•<� .0 1 T .0 F � d C S SS m �j XI � ^ V. m Eli m o .c 2 N N N N " m C y m c C .O N E J .i� y - 0 o 8 8 '8 o 0 0 o O m •S E m C C N t > 3 3- L N N N U O O,S t)m •cl N m d 1111 L L u u m = n m v a a $_0 0ro`o . 0 0 ` © .- 0 L l f _ N liii en t O G) m Sh O m u j CL E a u 0 7 T 0 ,p -m0 N a O L O O C O E• O U O O O C9 N C ` m L C N N C O a b Q C C C C L O 725 O O O N m N O L O N o L m N N N p, L m C Co c N • C5 ) m C3 O N CJ N T CJ C en N m T 0 q 'O 'O 2 C -D x O .- Ti LA O U C a ) y .•-• .O -8 _O n C a a 2 C Cl T ro C") - N .0 RI al N �8 C8�� C8' � 8 Q T = O " COO 3 a. D_ a m . a 8 O O O 0 Cn 5 z ate. a 5 O O 0 S c 0 a a 5 a c v 01> 7 m CO CO N N ,n in O N to N T C ,--• O N O O m CO Z Ca 0 .N- OD N V I!) t0 Y lf) l0 ‘,..7 111 d CA—O N U Ch CD • X N N N CD N N . C7 l� 1� c-) N■ C C r Ch r u.i r O CO fl1 O O t N n n N t` r • N c0 (D c 0 u- c O 0 r o, 0) C V c W C >- m In CO co to Co CI)CI) O_"- > .0 N . CO N C1 01 N 61 CO W )n (O ID © N cD N O t1 U N ° U c r r r •r1 ;4-4 U LO Y T N co ..-) CD N LO C n CD rf CO CD 0 In to In N C m a/� � O 6 > .G X x x X X x X x X X X x x x X X X `\paced' lL U C CO O CD 141 tl C N• CD 'V CO CD C)) C.0 N Cf) N C c J X© r c u O n 0 ,y.�q ry U .� C9 'D V. a 3 -o c — m U Y o N o 'a C = 6 o 0 CO rip 0 3 m -a 3 ° v z -F., 3 rn m p F U u O (f1 Y 3 m U) c`v to o L c c .(.1 U S V ?L+ o G C w O G N O C O Z Li m a. U) . CO m CO U C u. s z a n: Cn I- >> 5 } . — A P R - y 7. . r yi. +c . 7'• r /F Y/ c +'s ,%•-"ii $,. ,.:a �± .y � 5�'C, 1.1. G#R"FaYI d'Y:ti/ Y '4' J:iS E'15 r �fikeig- .v f '}9 � : t b r'% R ::.....', .zi'v,.^.�ih.<L.... {.� .i�.f'�5':.�.��^�'v.:lo .�k�yttii>.bo.',.S�.Yt`6�+�V�y'Y.°`S': .�i e ' �,,.f�°•n�.'Mi4......<a '.v: ?,';oh..�:u. :.t Entrance Hole Cut-outs Trace on to Wood with carbon paper. - Wrens, chickadee & nuthatches 10 Western Bluebird and Tree Swallow Purple Martin Northern Flicker Cut off this point American Kestrel after drilling holes Screech Owl and Saw-whet Owl 3.5' Eel n Wood Duck The entrance hole for Violet-green Swallows is an oval shape, 7/8" high and 3.5"wide. A diamond-pattern could also be used with the same dimensions. -41440.00.- ( - -3.5' 1 --------- --- 4 B. References A • •• • i- is- • A is :ir. by Stephen Kress, 1985. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY. (The) Birdhouse Book by Don McNeil, 1979. Pacific Search Press, 222 Dexter Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109. Building Birdhouses and Feeders by Ed and Stevie Baldwin, 1985. Doubleday and Co, Inc., Garden City, New York, NY. Cavity-Nesting Birds of North American Forests by Scott Virgil et al, 1977. Agriculture Handbook 511, U.S. Forest Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. (The) Complete Book of Birdhouse Construction for Woodworkers by Scott Campbell, 1984. Dover Publications, Inc. New York, NY. (A) Field Guide to Western Birds' Nests by Hal Harrison, 1979. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. Homes for Birds by Daniel Boone, 1979. Conservation Bulletin 14, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Composition, U.S, Government Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. How to Attract, House and Feed Birds by Walter Schultz, 1970. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. How to Control House Sparrows by Don Grussing, 1980. Roseville Publishing House, P.O. Box 8083, Roseville, MN 55113. This urban wildlife publication was funded by the Washington Department of �i Wildlife's Nongarne Program and Wildlife Education Program, through the sale of person- . c> a alined liense plates. • t JI Produced by Donna Gleisner, Text by Stephen Penland and.Donna Gieisner, Artwork by:Nicola Yarbrough First printing 1988, 15K; Second printing 1990, 10K; Third printing 1992, 10K The Washington Department d WiIdIIo will provide equal opportunities to a!! potential and ocisting employees without regard to ram creed.color,sex,sexual' Washington Department of \'Vildlie Malys. department ago, cei es Feder national fish n,disi`aUy,ororahon Era Veteran's —reyRt Serving \Vashington'S slate;.The dmanmont receives ubletat Nd The fish and wildlife rhts Al Lof 1 I/ The department Is sehba to Tills VI of the Civil Rights A o1 196E and ♦ Vj� Section 504 of the Rehabihtatlun Ad o11973,which prohbit,d.scriminntion on the basis of W i lcftl fe and people-- Inn,wloa national origin or handicap. II you believe you have boon docrerrir411ed against in any department program.activity.of'agility,or II you want loaner inlomalion about Tr 1.3 : now and .❑ the VI or Section 50.7,write to:Mineral Equal Opportunity,U.S.Department of Interior, ,• Washington,O.C.20240,or Washington Dopanmont o1 WPJI80.600 Como!Way N. \I1r es.s Olympia WA 96501•7031, future - - 5/5/2010 ►CCEL/4� Conditions Associated With 8:14:42AM Case#: SEP06-00180 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 0001 ONGOING MONITORING HOLD NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM H- AS PER WAC 246-272A AND JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 ALL SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING AGREEMENT RECORDED TO THE PROPERTY TITLE PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 0002 pressure test observation None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Health Dept.required to observe pressure test with system designer when system fully installed/complete,48 hours notice to be provided for scheduling. 0003 alternative-asbuilt required HOLD NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM H-An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 0005 well setback requirement None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Setbacks to all wells- 100'required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50'required from tanks and effluent transport lines. 0008 dry season installation None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Dry season installation required. 0011 easement HOLD Met 3/25/2008 LAM 3/28/2008 LAM H-Recorded easement required for primary and/or reserve drainfields. Easement recorded 3/25/08,#532436 with the Jefferson County Auditors office. 0015 protection from vehicular traffic None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 0017 staking of drainfield None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 0018 dose counter&ETM None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Dose counter and elapsed time meter are required in the control panel for all system components. 0019 divert drainage None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 0020 transport line double cased None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 0022 water tight tank None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Septic tank and pump chamber to be water tight. Extra protection(i.e.Bentonite)to be used around inlet, outlet, and risers due to high water table. 0031 no building permit guarantee Warn NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site.Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 0033 UDC compliance None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 0051 risers None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Risers are required to grade with secured lids over both compartments and over the outlet of the septic tank for inspection and maintenance/monitoring. Minimum 20"riser over inlet. Page 1 of 3 CaseConditions..tpt 5/5/2010 CCEL Conditions Associated With 8:14:42AM Case#: SEP06-00180 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 0061 MONITORING SCHEDULE None NOT MET x'25.2008 LAM As per Jefferson County Code 8.15 all onsite sewage systems require monitoring. Monitoring shall be provided by an approved entity. THIS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED PER JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 AS ADOPTED OR AMENDED. 0063 surface water setback None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Setback to surface waters- 100'required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50'required from tanks. 0064 protective barriers HOLD NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM H-Permanent barriers are required along/around primary and reserve drainfield areas and 30'downgradient to protect from parking,driving,and other land disturbing activities prior to final. 0065 SPAAD None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Compliance with the conditions of the Site Plan Approval Advance Determination is required. 0068 System Capacity-no ADU None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM This system as designed and approved is sized for only one single family residence. It is not sized for an Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU). The minimum daily design flow per residence is 240 GPD. 0069 Water line setback None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM 10'separation required between a Water line and all portions of the onsite sewage system;effluent transport line,tanks, treatment and disposal components EXCEPT as specifically identified on the approved design. 0071 Setback-Drains None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM A 30'setback shall be maintained from the disposal component and reserve area to any downslope footing,curtain or interceptor drain or drainage ditch. 0075 SCREEN REQUIRED None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM A screen shall be provided either at the outlet of the septic tank or around the pump or at both locations.A pump shroud is required if only an outlet baffle filter is used. 0078 0&M Manual required None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Before final approval is given,the designer shall provide an operations and maintenance manual to the property owner and the Health Department. The manual must instruct the owner of the on site sewage system on the ways to properly operate and maintain all components of the system. 0081 Designer Notification/inspections None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Designer must be contacted prior to start of construction and for inspections during installation.DESIGNER IS REQUIRED TO DO A PRECOVER INSPECTION ON ALL TYPES OF SYSTEMS. 0083 Installation Inspection None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM Notification of the start of construction shall be faxed or emailed to Jefferson County Public Health ONE WORKING DAY prior to start. 0500 FLOOD AREA None NOT MET 3/26/2008 ZAL Portions of the subject parcel where the septic tanks and transport lines are located are mapped within Flood Zone A (FEMA FIRM 530069 0190 B). Per the septic design,the septic tanks and transport lines are outside of the 100-yr. flood boundary. IF THE SEPTIC TANKS ARE RELOCATED, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL CONTACT THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(PHONE 360-379-4450)AND JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH(PHONE 360-385-9444)TO DETERMINE IF THE NEW LOCATION IS WITHIN THE FLOOD BOUNDARY. IF THE COMPONENTS ARE MOVED TO WITHIN THE MAPPED FLOOD BOUNDARY,THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN CHAPTER 15.15 JCC (FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION). 2401 Stormwater BMPs None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices(BMPs)to control stormwater,erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction,and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. Page 2 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt 5/5/2010 CCEL Conditions Associated With 8:14:42AM Case#: SEP06-00180 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date D3 7202 F-Confirmed ESAs None NOT MET 3/25/2008 LAM The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County staff for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs)under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection,the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:Flood hazard, seismic hazard,Fish and wildlife habitat,wetland. Page 3 of 3 CaseConditions..rpt ____..__.. APR - 3 2008 f.'�'eLUPMENT REVISED REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON March 21, 2008 FOR FRED NASON GEOENGINEERS File No.16338-001-00 APR - 3 2008 •` j Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan File No. 16338-001-00 March 21, 2008 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard, Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. /4111 I Jos- . • C.al aghan Senior Biologist j;11 Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAB:jl ORCH1 16\16338001100Tinals11633800I00RevisedHMp R.doc Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright®2008 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No.16338-001-00 APR - 32008 _' i � ■ TABLE OF CONTENTS 7j Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 Wildlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 10 CONTINGENCY PLAN 11 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 File No. 16338-001-00 Page i GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) APR - 3 2008 J Page No. G"rEN7 List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 • List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B—SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C— BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D—PLANTING DETAILS APPENDIX E—SPECIES LISTINGS APPENDIX F—WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS File No. 16338-001-00 Page ii March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERS REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APR - 3 2008 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON FOR 1 u?;3FNT FRED NASON INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock,Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest ''A of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 65 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence,invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement lan for the site p to is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Pagel GEOENGINEEHS March 21,2008 APR - 3 2008 documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant j species. 1P;:EhlT This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USFWS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003);and File No. 16338-001-00 Pagel GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 APR - 3 2008 • the Soil Survey of Je fferson County Area, Washington (United States De p apkment of Agriculture j [USDA] 1975 and 2001). GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife, tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI • wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types (Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List— Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site (Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003)and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GEOENGINrIR March 21,2008 I \ . C �.-. YY F, APR - 3 2008 ''_ ' examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR j 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered VC and threatened species,critical habitat,candidate species and species of concern for this project. _-=-.-_________ Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act(ESA) as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging along the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. File No.16338-001-00 Page 4 GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 APR - 3 2008 Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). -----.-- 1 However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat,on.the eastern side _ _ . e:cfdT of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the —`^ northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map (2007) of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments,there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branta bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding. File No.16338-001-00 Page S March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERS Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra),Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea (Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore,not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs(tracks,nests,etc) and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented presence within the literature as described above in the PHS. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 6 March 21,2008 CEOENGINEER� APR - 3 2008 ' DISCUSSION PROPOSED PROJECT �'��icIJ7 A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 65 feet with a five foot sideyard setback. After construction, the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way, therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces, such as roads,rooftops and driveways,cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. File No.16338-001-00 Page 7 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S APR - 32008 Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion - control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed 7NT during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be _ -- consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation (Himalayan blackberry,poison hemlock and stinging nettle)will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table(Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C – Buffer Enhancement Plan and Planting Specifications is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species, planting specifications and schematic, as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 8 GEOENGINEERs March 21,2008 Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting Common Scientific On-Center Estimated Name Name Spacing(feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 31 menziesii Hooker's willow Salix hookeriana 6 1 gallon 43 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 74 parviflorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 43 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 43 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 8 racemosa Indian plum Oemleria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasiformis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munitum Dune grass Elymus mollis 3 Plugs 307 Plants will be installed according to specifications outlined in Appendix C. A Mulch ring will be placed around the drip line of each plant and soils will be amended if needed. Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds,small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. Bird boxes will be installed on existing trees and/or on individual pedestals installed within the enhanced buffer. The Site Development Plan in Appendix B illustrates the proposed location of bird boxes. Bird box specifications should follow guidelines established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife located at their website http://wdfw.wa.eov/wlm/backyard/nest- mat design.htm and the attached publication Nest Boxes for Birds in the WDFW Urban Wildlife Series (Appendix F). TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. i v 1 ,! it File Na 16338-001-00 Page 9 APR - 3 2008 y/ March ll,2008 GEOENGINEERSZ _.�JOS'r:iENT MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. An as-built report will be developed and submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation by someone with expertise in native plants. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will be conducted by an individual with native plant expertise and will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. Yearly Monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted to the county by October 31 of each monitoring year. GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site (Table 2). The term"recruitment" as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data will be recorded in the form of an as-built report. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique (using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event,other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris,and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. APR - 3 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 70 March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERSZ ;,FNT CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above, will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. CONCLUSIONS This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals. — I - 3 /2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 11 March 21,2008 GEOE G INFERS I ''_lp?ctENT REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853. 2005. 50 CFR Part 226. Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311. 2005. 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout. Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 185. 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol. 72,No. 91. Desbonnet,A., P. Pogue, V. Lee,and N. Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island.71pp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas. (Accessed April 25,2007) Jefferson County. 2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/msnub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25,2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia,Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. htto://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Popul ations/Index.cfm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing,Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture.2001. Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area,Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/technical/soils/hydric 1ists/hydsoil-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. httn://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtInds/launch.html (Accessed April 25,2007) APR - 3 2008 r: ENT _ File No.16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candidate Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County. Revised December 20,2005. httn://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland, Washington; 1:24000,7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990. Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29RO1E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August I,2006. http://www.dnr.wa.govinhn/contact/wnhntrs.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) APR - 3 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGlNEER March 21,2008 S ' any-St----Ferry N it I 0 0 F a t g S 6 E ` >° II 1 0 Ir ' 4"/R 1r Ca a I 4+047 41F ��a �� At 'Laurel-St lY_ - t -.. `t — v ,—Ale -600p-Rd.. A' Dmdap-O -%a n flµ la9 Die rRry O Is e --4700Ier-Rd-- R m .irAVa ?.' r g -'tYFi pr Rw. N %. Site �. Ic h m U a s. Washington-La- E t-e�'!"i' Oak-Rd— 11, Sx� ^1 r t I I .1.-,... --. ,, I m ' .2 914 ifiEiff n t, r 3 \ V '', 0 {y fA t Vt 1, x g � i ' s e -Shsi 0 g 'x90 tr'y:} 2.000 0 2,000 �+,MIN= NEM= 5 j 5/ 31 y1 �� w NV w r Feet s Mou 8 r' .=` Vicinity Map "ores' 181 Portage Way HMP a 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. g y 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached L document. GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the o accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E R S Figure 1 is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the gofficial record oth this communication. Jr /r fr / } ' /// fife f Aff!r J ffrf 8 + J , p f... aowo ':.�.; ..:a. ,.,tr:af.- t f J fJ+r f I%r/!f f!J f�{r f ff-�;r:f'rf f-f✓f/�rf fIfl,''A fJf Jl,f f J!/'�f!,f r,'r!r ff f r f'.rf f�ifif''/.r f r J JJ''rf r'f fJ r `/A r' y t J : ,, Ii w f r ,i J ' AA ' ' A z-.; ff y .£.p`, E A ysN , F t. .0 • • . F_� 4s. fF/ i bS Frr } `/' f rr i, JJf f fr nyu l ' • f r .x- X . `r-0 f� s; rff'A /.f oU n ./ , f/ t9A•L•A. ti di'T • •� .�-: 1 •F .' f: t. , ' -• .i".",41:., II I(: , 1101 ' .11111111111 7 ii al � ' 500 0 500 N in Site Boundary wl E 2 Feet 9 1001 s Wetlands s NWI Map Notes: a t.The locations of all features shown are aVpcoximate. 181 Portage Way H M P a 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. -intended to t Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an A ch -- -- - document. GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee he accuracy and content of electronic files. The mast r file , U re 2 is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as t qpR —3 O E, I NE E R 9 8 official record oth this communication. ' � ..._. !ltr: _ - • '=i. ENT ca) at kr.......... 613 0 1033 . s s ti m f "Th 9q N y. K St m lit (.. -- i 9 E d. e m Td-Tidal Marsh 0 Site 500 o 500 " `Co-Coastal Beaches — .... W nv E `= Bk-Belfast silt loam Soils Fee` $ CIC -Cathcart gravelly silt loam s p HuC-Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map HvC-Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way HMP WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy loa = Port Hadlock, Washington a f Notes: ! __ _...__�_.�. c 1.The locations of all features shorn are eppropmale. ( yyy... oU` 2 This drawing is for infornatlon purposes. 11 is intended to ■ +�/p_+Q��O ■' N E E R Figure 3 assist in showing features discussed in an attached APR — 3 ,VO document. GeoEngineers.Inc.can not guarantee the I iEaccuracy and content of electronic files. ` fi4!-4f" Coi 1 DEPT ,tTY DEVELOPMENT GEOENGINEERZ ` v �` 11I f/li i Ir`1 ' i% / lil � t le I!j`,I Ili Ja ,ii f1 Ili /Il APPENDIX A ,/7 l77//H86 l/ 'i/I SITE PHOTOGRAPHS /////////////,y/f ',/l ' � sxut nwrmuwAxnrrs�aru.wavuamraemxsnwnxarsave�exauwx.+ ;xx»rvr�amnirewmx xen yea= ., ea a. n. ".ra:�a,ow�." r.... y/ //,; / ly ; iillif illi,/,',,//el rig f j i APR - 3 2008 ' APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS eirp ry� sx Photograph I Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern portion of Mature vegetation to the west of the site the site ') APR - 3 2008 t '�1 Fde No 16338-001-00 Page A-I December 14,2007 GEOENGiNEElfS Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal APR - 3 2008 ?1 i T File Na 16338-001-00 Page A-2 - - December 14,2007 GEOENGINEER '-•• --.... ---- ---- . , ,. , ., •. . , , , , GEOENGINEERS ;). - \ \ \ , v , 1 i I I 1 I 1 ' 1 1 1 i I I 1 ( 1 ( 1 ( I 1 ( I ( r i a I a/i',, APPENDIX B ///if//////,,,,,,, ///Hp t//, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN / ./ ii7//;;;;/,,,,,,;6:: :::r 171,I.1t.,.,.,','i,, /c;(11,;"1"F:::.:•' YU I/I /t4i,p ii ii //I,14 7 /If Plif \ ( I s ','• ' '. \ • •--.- (( \ \\.\\\ %-, • ' • ",, \ '.-. '-s„'N'-''.. •, • :::+; ( 17, li •,'•-,,, i ._.''' I , ... ., ,, .... ..... ...,... 11 1 ,..,. “:1 1'• I: :•,1 L.--- t )';• 1 i r i : 1 ! ... ... --- ■ APR - 3 2008 !Li , TY .. .. -.. -..... .-__ , , CC'1.•-•11: , -, ... --- - . -. -.. - L lifEF .:P.•• .:'EVELOPielENT -.... -,.. ---, ---__ -— 1-..... - -- —_ . . co X '0 c el) C- = O. < SS. •s 0 E 3 3 72 ar,' c0 8 > -u w— w 0-0 ul 2 c7; 3 0, & UJ cn 0 , im • z tri 0 1■9 y CO 0<'-', L 0 -c > a > 0 in Oa 4 o o 0 Y y w < W U 0 0 0 0 0 Ce 'I . ,? " N41( c( < 41 Ar ..00 • tn o < a o > m 5 .-‹ I■ "api 61 9.0 ■=11...1-- ,--, 47* a 57,0 ■--. * .()%0.,,e 4., '4.141111111\ 8 2 z .2 Whirtrire **S ‘###* Z(,) w Vet L,I 1.14t04 A <La ? t- (g) b APAIIPPA, 0 zi-- • 2 I' ;*1 VI I III II4 V*IN. 3 za LA ' ' • **Si ‘ 1- _J,v) 0 (,_ V W Cc o °C, ZE.1 In W `••41tIS,.i 6°" OA k-0,ID ma< L, u_ / V4•S Fv:(- 5 MP c2 m o 0 •45,1„,.. N ii% < 2 z Ln u-1 1- '00 S4P ,AP -3 t p 0 Z •rf- .C'f' **ilk 1-d m < — D w W VAIONVA p ,, g.g . 0 Ri•Si 0 c, 2 t E 0 ,n q 0 1 4,sf, rail ----r -9 a-. 2' 'i:, ;. , FS." F - s' '-:- tig-1 1 1,,.= -. r ' '- 1 • I ' n ■i I 1 '2 ED 0_ e g.E S ° APR — 3 2008 - '--' 34 I 1 ii 'i-1 g i - 12247 i ao/a/vo,- - mviewo . ,•`:P: .1 T!TT:4 6t A4K 41 i Noi YI\oo\I 008f£91\,d\H3d0 .„...„,,- ,---------..,z--,:>-_,,:--.. NN GEOENGINEERS/2 \ \ \ \ , , I ' 1 \ ■ , A \ 1 ' 1 ' 1 I 1 1 / 1 'H I .W 1 i f j i I I .I 1 /Ii I i , /: / i„f/ , I . r , APPENDIX C BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN ill7/://,'",/,'''::/, fril",)i!i,,7:/k,,',/,', 7 IOWIllik/A10111 fiVilliii/011 11/1/11/§47/1 I I i Vilififillifi i ft I 1 '1141 Oil I 1:11, /11:11111 I I I I l' I V\ II ( I ( *4.. , *„ , ,... . . . ..,,... ...., ...71 . . . , --': FT ),, . -. •, , .... f ''' -"''' '1 r--------------7 .. , APR - 3 2008 --' ' - .. .. ,.... ._ ! , ',i L':j 1 , 1 i • . ,„ _ _ „ .. . Ca- -‘-:', ., .. „ .„ . , ____------ ■ ORCH\P:\16338001\00\CAD\1633800100.dwg GJA:BMK 03/21/08 umm 1 m a 2£a z m g O– NZ NCO OZS Z I 1 1 11 il ii ey °£ £ O MOO --1 o z0 B g$ 7.'131 m Amcr Nrm o o r j g F a'am d °.i_. xm n -0 m TWN ' N K Ufi NN CMX ]1x -n > * Z 0 R 11111111 K E I 11 li I 114 ill'ili . . —on F u M 3 a a , L'all a a • 4 m ® o o a @..2 s aa a 0 8 3�f v. od 11 I ' Bo_ O n _I S rA A AA �A m OG= ,O KO N O 9 -0 ✓ Z°0 £ n 71 A 0 D °m-o n ➢r.1 - an j n Omcrm rn gm Km1 m £ z m A � 74.1 iv O o yy of w W C 70 r O r U N C N ° ul A 4 03 0 E -CmN ZmZ ?I rn m-im 1 \ i ��-- Z nU E ro —I 0 r,-‘ ,..■∎, � NORTy <'06 0£ N O m Fri .1bSik 3p. 33• Z y ° ��hlioo Op. rs -F r •. q T \41r4 4.411 o • ia:• m Z I TO mZ WC irliMilliii ik rn ��; ,,O0 ril rirG m- I oN O ti 1 m m N o cm GI NI p p 1 CO L1 zw 0TH 33x00' <-0 Om W 2 M IT1 a o = 69 0p� x m v m o — likeST 41:111 'A-+ n)y -' APR - 3 2008 ; -.> ,m N G � Dm m 1. .` x K o k Z m ° O n z_J z c - „i" y4'LLOPivIENT 1 •...s.‘:',.,.N.,:\,:\.,,\\ . \ s, • GEOENGINEERS 11 s \ ■ \\ 1 ' ' 1 i 1 I r t 1 11 ' II I1 111// i l I/I ill/ i III , / /t/fiti tiltrift '17 - Ill lit 1/1/ APPENDIX D ////,,titt,7, PLANTING DETAILS / qiii/.,,,,,„,/,,,,411,7 1,//7////Pi/ i'i ,,,,, ,,,,,•.,,,,,,•,,,,,,, 1/ 1i.7 1 1.,/70',/,',/ii,:gf,',„'' ',It li, „bill //71 1 1/1/11 / / / 0/#11/1141 I lit,[ 111 81111 li \\V\ I( I . , . . .... . . . . ., APR 3 2008 -,), , 1 1 ' 1 , - , , ,.., ..., -,,,, .-_.• --...._ -- J i, ,... ---.. -,„ -- ------ ".., .. . .., K_ D DO x co —1M K 1-y 0 y• o• 0 jO C c. z W Q W y Y> Q. O o ` u $ N = Oi Z adaA \ m` a '�" N I�0 ct u Z_ ` am Y O 3 r3 35 o rn dY H = g c @ tr1 K :t.\ .a 2e a m = MIN& 17j m d flt Z a is .�y�, 44?-,yF� v o oa O ",i-1.:''''''a. QM .- __ O C y m a � zo9d E m= ��1+I` E. p A y u E a C o sa;s q5 °iE zf!,�f 0 V ` nne E m m �i li �n 3 g . . zM 0 cEM OV1 D Z x2 W JZ op e 0- 2 WZ K w O m "fl r a a a ° W C D Z Ca 4 V U 0 0 0 U U U �Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z4 r4 0 t0 0 0 M N c0 ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ¢ ¢ Q Q J Q ¢ 0 A a:: •• • •• c W N ■E •• gE q s°C $ E V C •••••• • • • C °e .2 b "" 1 1 r ••••::• • i° � 22 C O is N Y QC Q. ,] 2. O •O•O• • • q CO N ••0000•• „ o G yqm 0 0 r, '3 A g W �8rf Z EE1m OJ m _@ m • 0: K T 0 Z m n a N I1!V w o w Z W Q O O O O — _ - g o x 0 0 0 3 w ry •; _ 5 QE � o t, t3Zw p `o •• • • • 0 :: • • o $ 0 ; APR - 2008 _ ° €g § 21".2815 F f M i Z-.1 eo/Lz/ro mwevro mac#d+41ssr va iooercar\a\NDao F GEOENGINEERS / , I J, i � F: APPENDIX E , SPECIES LISTINGS I i. .,.., i'1,ritlid`y„,././4,....1.' . .':!:.,..• t f �t i � �. �\ A A,; � , -n --- ,/,I,../1. ..9 NII,I1.1 E I I _ APR - 3 2008 'J I .`� 1 l Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon& Steelhead (1 pilaw.,.11,q `Ofi-) Current Endangered ESA Listing Actions Species1 Species Act Under Review Listin Stains Snake River Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynehus 2 Ozette Lake nerka) 3 Baker River Nor Warranted 4 Okanogan River Not Warrooted 5 Lake Wenatchee No/0 anted 6 ,Quinalt Lake Not War■orocti 7 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted 8 Sacramento River Winter-run Endangered 9 Chinook Salmon Upper Columbia River Spring:run Endangered (0.eshalkyttcha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened II Snake River Fall-run Threatener( 12 Puget Sound Threatened 13 Lower Columbia River Threatened 14 Upper Willamette River Threatened 15 Central Valley Spring-run lenoth000l 16 California Coastal 17 Central Valley Fall and Late Fall-eats 18 UppsKlamath-Tnnity Rivers Not Warranfed 19 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 20 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring-run Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River summer/fall-nut Not Warranted 23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 Deschutes River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 25 Central California Coast /f606oz,,, Coho Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northern California 16,./soi, (0.kistneh) 27 Lower Columbia River • Critical habitat 28 Oregon Coast Na Warranted 29 Southwest Washington Undetermined 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia 31 Olympic Peninsula Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run Threatened (0.keta) 33 Columbia River Threatened 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Geta _ Not 44Oularstod 35 Pacific Coast Not Warranted 36 Southern California Endaerrered 37 Upper Columbia Ryer Wififfiffia Steelhead 38 Central California Coast (0 my/tsar) 39 „Routlicontril Coli ft irum Ci Threatened 40 Snake River Basin Threatened 41 Lower Columbia River Threatened 42 California Centra.Valley Threatened 43 tipper Willamette River Threatened 44 Middle Columbia River Threatened 45 Northern California TM comm.,/ 46 Oregon Coast 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted • Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound Thrc aterhol • Protective Regulations 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon 51 Even-year Not Warranted (0 gorbusetto 52 Odd-year Not Warranted I The ESA defines a"species"to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife, For Pacific salmon,NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Significant Unit,or"ESU,"a"species"under the ESA. For Pacific steelhead,NOAA Fisheries has del' PnpnietiereSegments--- (DPSs)for consideration as"species"under the ESA. .7` APR - 32008 L 7.= ..._OP--ENT c"'m."7 "`4".sr>.,:ms7W t T* 4 GEOENGINEERS '' ',—.-• .• / • lift lilt 7//� I iiIl,I II /i, I1llf'1 ,� 1E I ii/Ili/ APPENDIX F ,/!//a%/17,,,,t,' WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS i �/11/ illUrgi/i �� I 111,E /11111 I I/1141 k ik ; l ` 1l - 1( �1. i A "� >��` APR — 3 2008 �, Ji Y ., }�} .LUF e�EhiT �� r _. . .. (for „,.%.,..,. R 1.\!u. ..,..0,;?...: t' „ems L u, r+..• eri+,_ _ a. 1 `� , V O V.. .. f sr�r•• // r /rl f l'A R �Y,,. t...Z.11\\\N `.Rlw �__-_. .�� :14Vi�•'� —"Tear ar 4r i1 � ` /_. A...,: { \ ` z+ul�l� k`1t 1, iJ1�: , „�..r NYC. Sr {t , r.. "'t a rr rcrscrrrrssrsrrrnrsa�rr �, ' r• 1. y1 , � 1• t r l '•}., r a 11lam<Mr AWrlrr �l. .” '::p:f I -' VA/ ', r \ 1^- l �- I^�� 1■ ..... r`4'I I ,, 1 el 1111 ■ - + i1` t ru« i ��, l 'M1 , a—I= f 171 i:,:uir�rh/t St}t r � tt x Iv' 1 " { I ♦' • r�url ' r e a I ,1 Ii 0-. � .'. 1` , i t o1 �� r4.4 .1a,, 4,• .15;-�-- t 1 ` �_' r4ijg .. . 'ear.�2 � ey � t.I.1 I i I Iri* .KI i '�r, I 1 r 13Y jj L I I` '.' } ..__ � 11T •;fir: Ir, 1 _' I I l t t 'Sti` 'i t't R 1 {tt). ' <��' M I' II.. .R> t J t 1' 1 (n 7 `, ��r tl..A! I 1 era i „ f' l 1 � J. y�,n,•; M yl t�,` f w . r '!i' 1 i { If 9 ' e 1 'I �' 1 .�r r t F a ` 1 �� i A L .r V : j Iy y." f� 1' .4• ..V.-....74'.„ . 1-. d I t e ,+!'s`y I 1 1 It I i �I 4 i+ Jt `e�v 1 r• \1(5�... +i �. , t - .t.1 'a i }L. ' 1 I. { i 1 7 k ':- 1.1N. .t r ..;rx+:1• .-,I!•.+. tir l 'r+ 1 1 1e ,� It l� rr I ,( x''2R I __ r I i . �} ,.. Li r ; ,f .;l .• 1\s„. ' iii • 11' ''i; VI i ' 'i 1 fij[ C) 1 ?° r _t 10% I t ,s--• ,.'. . 41 rte' r r ` � _/, y' _ t 'y��t' .J i - I ' I ' 1 1 ' t .e+- al&:t y.%i!'N �4 t" ., f b II. �M I 1 I --::-.-,,w,.' .r �� ter \ �' • ______. _.—_ AI;-^' t+4� a". it' .... I 'roan Wildlife Series Wnshirrglon Department of Wildlife 7 \ '` S OXE� FOR BIRDS S. ; As a tree dies, sections of it decay and make up for natural homes that are lost when become hollow. These cavities are dry and too many trees in a bird's habitat are removed. warm, serving as secluded nurseries for many These cavity-nesting birds can, in turn, help young birds. In Washington, about 43 different you by easing insects that may harm your trees kinds of birds nest in holes in dead or dying and bushes, Being concerned about wildlife trees. Of these birds, 15 often occur in city also shows good stewardship for our state's parks and around homes. The more common irreplaceable natural resources. ones are chickadees, nuthatches, flickers, This publicatkr vC rs nesIbax b'uittg swallows and wrens. materials; designs,'tpor� trtclion And ,�` Putting up nest boxes can help these ment; pest proofing;!i, on attracting birds to' : I cavity-nesting birds, Your artificial nest helps your yard. and facts nk e.ii UA`fi '-ne3to 8 :I t cowry DEPT Iry u::VELOPMENT 2. , 3 ,a,' 'A.K,S._ c `K' ,v,7R. ..'Y<`t Si< tir ' 2:p' uya b tia>lgy. e 1 w'2 r r x Materials Design You can buy a bird house through special ENTRANCE HOLE: mail order suppliers, the National Audubon Design and construction of a bird house Society or local need to be bird specific. The most important garden and part of that bird house is the entrance hole. If nursery stores. _ - the hole is too small, the desired bird won't be Or you can build able to enter. If it's too big (and this is more one following likely) undesirable wildlife — like house spar- the guidelines 7 i rows, starlings, squirrels and cats–can get in and plans In this m I , and harm or evict the intended bird. publication. Lf' '` As a rule, house sparrows can't enter a Whether you x;4". nest box if the entrance hole is less than 1.25 buy it or build it, t l ki.:�, inches in diameter. Starlings can't enter if the here are some i lt.) i 14 hole is less than 1.75 inches in diameter. The important t , ,•a s1. , en trance hole sizes in this publication are p � t 1 to keep in mind. ( , it ¢�1 ' designed to exclude these pasts wherever Wood Is �'� i� l possible. the best material S 1 1 • li to use for Ij i ROOF: p , houses. It's a Roofs need i ( good insulator, to be built with i l .i.,f it's available and enough of a slant i ( ' ii I I easy to use, and to shed water. The } it blends in well with the landscape. Three- top front edge of the roof should overhang at quarter inch boards are the easiest to work least 3 inches to protect the entrance from with. Soft Wood,such as pine, is fine for driving rain or snow, and to keep cats from smaller nests, but cedar or redwood may be reaching in from above. used for larger boxes. If you use plywood, Provids a hinged side or roof so houses make sure it is exterior grade. A well-con- can be easily checked and cleaned out each strutted house should last 10 to 15 years. year. (Annual cleaning reduces the possibility Use galvanized nails to build houses if of spreading parasites and diseases from year necessary, but remember that they loosen up to year.) Hinges should be rust-proof. Duck as wood expands and contracts in extreme and owl box roofs kept shut with a hook and weather conditions. Cedar and redwood nest eye can be opened by raccoons. It's much boxes should probably be made with concrete easier to use paired roofing nails with large coated or ring shank nails. These nails won't heads or duplex nails on the side of the roof allow the boards to loosen up. Screws also and the upper edge of a side. Wiring these work fine. nails together will keep the bird house shut and raccoon-proof. DO NOTuse wood treated with green preservative. The green copper-based preservative, when ex- posed to water,can produce poisonous vapors. DO NOT painl,stain or treat box with creosote. DO NOTuse tin cans, milk cartons or metal for nests. Metals quickly heat up to lethal temperatures on warm spring and summer days,overheating the eggs and killing the birds. Commercial plastic wood duck houses are also acceptable but they should be placed in shady locations. . 77,7,—iiii a ' � 1 APR — 3 2008 J is G. 'LCPMENT j 3. SIDES AND SEAMS: other species of birds arrive, put netting or wire Natural tree cavities have rough interior over the entrance hole. surfaces that give young birds traction, espe- cially when climbing out of the nest. A bird WHERE: house can mimic this rough surface below the The nest box should be somewhat entrance holes with grooves, cleats, hardware concealed, in partial shade and placed where cloth or a similar surface that can be gripped predators can't get to it. Check to be sure the by the birds feet. birds have an adequate, clear flight path near Don't nail the sides to the top of the the entrance hole. If possible, the entrance floorboard. The sides of a bird house should should face away from the prevailing wind. It enclose the floorboard. This keeps rain from usually helps to put the box on a habitat edge: seeping into the crack between sides and floor between a group of trees and low-growing and then into the nest. Placing the floorboard bushes, or between bushes and an open 1.25 inches above the meadow, lawn or water. bottom of the sides All nest boxes should be firmly attached also keeps moisture to a support post or a tree. When attaching a from seeping in from ® nest box to a live tree, use lag screws and below. washers. These screws can be gradually All seams that loosened as years pass, allowing the tree to won't be open should o grow without any deformities. be water tight. Exterior o glue or caulking materi- HOW MANY: als work well for this. A good rule of thumb is to allow 1/4-acre between most bird houses. Because most VENTILATION birds are territorial, the average-sized yard will HOLES: probably only hold one nesting pair of a par- At least two 1/4- ticular species. Territory size varies among inch holes should be drilled near the top of the birds—house sparrows and tree swallows right and left sides of all bird boxes to let air require only several feet of space, robins need circulate. This is especially important for small less than half an acre, while chickadees and nest boxes. Drainage holes are also important. nuthatches usually need several acres. Other Drill at least four 1/4-inch drain holes in the birds, like purple martins and wood ducks, floor of the house. This will help drain moisture don't defend territories. That's why martin that manages to get inside. houses are the "apartment" type. Territories change from year to year, so a Placement well-designed and well-placed nest box will WHEN: eventually be used if birds you're trying to Some birds begin courtship and nesting attract are found in your neighborhood. If a activities nest box isn't used for some time, birds nesting ctivities as early as February, but most birds nearby may be defending the area from other select sites from late March through May. This birds of the same species. It may help to set is also the time when most migrating birds out several nest boxes (for certain species) in return to Washington. Nest boxes can be set different places so birds can pick the best site. out as you notice new birds arriving. If you don't want house sparrows or European However, newly made bird houses need starlings to be your next tenants, be sure to to be set out in winter to weather and air out. take down unused houses after the desired --, To prevent house sparrows and European birds have settle . starlings from setting up house in them before d- at , ��? iii ?1 APR - 3 20 O'fl i"!j 4. • v Pest Placing nest boxes four to five feet off the I J j 'f1 ground and in brushy areas will discourage Proofing _ r fr f these pests. Natural enemies I or European starlings that are nesting in a bird pose the greatest threat ill I l(11 house, it is legal to remove their nests and to birds using man- 1111 Il I l destroy the eggs. (Unlike most birds, these made boxes. Metal � • • ll species are not protected b poles used for mounts p p by any state or or a sheet metal guard lilt 641 federal law.) Nests may have to be removed five to six times before sparrows or starlings encircling trees or �iTti rl finally abandon the house. Jjj� wooden poles helps t' r1� Small animals, like mice, squirrels, bees protect birds from cats and wasps, may also decide to move into a and squirrels. Suspend- tjt nest box. If you don't want them there, remove ing nest boxes from it, the nest to discourage them. wires beyond the ot When the nesting season is over, open jumping range of these ,ijr 1\ an unseamed panel on the nest box and leave predators is also effec- 1/1/ \\�`. it that way throughout the winter. This prevents tive. i ��� deer mice from using It as a winter home. Perches aren't . Otherwise these mice may "defend" their box really needed. If left on • from returning songbirds in the spring by killing a nest box, perches will Al, and eating them if the birds enter "their" box. attract house sparrows f If raccoon are stealing eggs from a nest box, and starlings. The place one or Iwo boards with the proper en- exception might be wood ducks. For them a trance hole drilled in them over the original slab of wood with the bark attached placed hole. This makes a short tunnel into the nest. horizontally under the entrance hole can make The raccoon's arm may still get into the box, landings easier. but it won't be able to bend it down to reach the House sparrows and European starlings eggs or chicks. usually won't nest within ten feet of the ground. Tips On Attracting Birds r,EbyNssi ;a • Plant native trees and shrubs for food and shelter " Iv*:she 1ti''. • Avoid using insecticide sprays whenever possible -,. :.1?1; • Leave grass and bush cuttings for nesting material !1,1` • Provide clean water in shallow, gently sloping containers '" ►I Plant colorful wildflowers that will attract insects for birds to eat • Leave 1-inch to 4-inch lengths of string or yarn for nesting material • Set out chopped apples, raisins, prunes or oranges to entice -.- ntice(ff oit-eating t? rc(0 , �. 5. Facts about Cavity-nesting Birds WOOD DUCK: Inhabits woodland streams and ponds during summer;not common in urban areas, Nest is a bare cavity, lined with down. Lays 8-10 white or creamy eggs. AMERICAN KESTREL: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;not common in urban areas.Nest is a shallow scrape in a cavity. Lays 4-5 mostly-white eggs. Eats rodents and insects. BARN OWL: Uses a variety of habitats. Nest is a shallow hollow in a cavity, Lays 4-7 while eggs. Eats rodents. SCREECH OWL:Widely distributed in forests,parks, orchards and woodlots. Nest is an unlined tree cavity. Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats rodents, NORTHERN FLICKER: Lives in open or sparsely wooded areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Lays 6-8 glossy white eggs. Eats insects, especially ants. HAIRY WOODPECKER: Inhabits mature woodlands, especially deciduous forests;uncommon in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Usually lays 4 glossy white eggs. Eats insects. DOWNY WOODPECKER: Inhabits open woodlands and natural parks;more common than hairy woodpecker in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually in dead wood, Lays 4-5 glossy-white eggs. Eats insects. VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW:Common In urban areas during the summer. Nest is a cup of dry grasses lined with feathers and fine materials placed in a crevice in buildings,old woodpecker holes or bird houses. Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. TREE SWALLOW:Widely distributed in summer, usually near water.Less common than violet-green swallow in urban areas. Nest is a cup of grasses lined with feathers in a natural cavity,old woodpecker hole or a crevice in a building. Lays 4-6 white eggs.Eats flying insects. PURPLE MARTIN:Widely distributed in summer, in past near human settlements,but now rare in the state due to habitat losses and competition from house sparrows and starlings for nest sites. Nest is placed in crevices in rocks, trees or buildings, or in old woodpecker holes. Lays 4-5 white eggs.Eats flying insects. CHESTNUT-BACKED CHICKADEE: Inhabits coniferous forests. Nest is made of moss, with a cup of fur,leathers and fibers. Lays 6.7 white eggs,sometimes speckled. Eats Insects in summer,seeds in winter. BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEE: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;common in urban areas. Nest and diet similar to chestnut-backed chickadee. Lays 6-8 white creamy eggs. RED-BREASTED NUTHATCH:Found in mixed forests;not common in urban areas. Nest is a cavity in dead wood,with a cup of grasses, rootlets and fur.Tree resin is smeared around the entrance hole. Lays 5-6 white or creamy eggs, usually speckled. Eats insects and seeds. HOUSE WREN:Widely distributed in areas with shrubby cover;uncommon summer resident in urban areas. Nests in any cavity, including the pockets of pants hanging on a clothesline. Lays 6-8 white,finely speckled eggs. Eats insects. BEWICK'S WREN:Inhabits open woodlands and thickets. Nest is a bulky cup in any cavity. Lays 5-7 white eggs, often speckled. Eats insects. WESTERN BLUEBIRD: Inhabits woodland clearings and open areas;rare in urban areas. Nest is a slight cup in a cavity, made of dry grasses and a few feathers.Lays 4-6 blue eggs. Suffers fro habitat and competition for nest sites from starlings, j�" ,, j � , ,r T YW 4 ,tr J.. ,�,?-.ENT 6. • ,i� \\\\ 1 N N i N C ) )• 5:. O• A` •t%l ••• m is C $ .5 .S .5 . " n -6 c 3 n .0 M1 .0 .c N ' 0 d .. 0 E ' 4; \ d •p O p p C „ � "! N V O O O j m c7 ✓ C N L O N o `_r O N .2 - { . j p O N , as N 3 3 3 n a P E J o. 2 Y Y C o ca _ D C' 0o0 ° N id 3 Co CO Y ) f n 6 0 a m cd 16 c 8'z, . •= a c v 0 a '3 o 0to 0 y N .c C m N L 0 N O 8 © N ,- 6 8 O L U N C ' t b ' N • c' c •p cn c v -0 -o o O v O - >yy ) , O L 6 /d is L c CS C V � E CJ p c' " pp -O @ " O O a c N C N C O ID O• O O N _E-. C _ if N N Z O O O O O Ti O O C1 L O N pp O E N N m O O O N O O C G o N C 'n O V N co c N 0 c N C 0 0 0 p (9 O 0 O C N N N >, m -0 'n C -. X C, 3 N O C U c 0 Y C 'p _p n a -8 L - C > a 'p3 8 8 o - 3 N .�m v n CD c m $ p E.co 3 C c c ? C U V 0 i O U a a O H a. O r3 co c z a a c 0 c c 0 a c a C 0)� j N m - N N ,.- M N (Y N r M r O N C 'd O 0 0 r o0 N V in co cv (n O 0 o Q O )n 0 4. = m 0 d CD C O 04 N-' m C Gh ac, •. f• N N co N N N • co • T N U) N N r C C x , .,- W ■= r m co U N > O CO co N r ,- N- N. N • CD O tir) V b { G C C l C W - . ` N to N CO in CO N � N rpJ Q5 N U CO al n) CD (D W tN in N N In p V c ,- r- r r ‘4• 0•4 �� • >` m w �' m n c' v n to a (0 co m u� u� (n r v /� p 6 > •G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x W LL 0 C c0 0 CO N V C N.• (D 't C (A C (r) in (n CV ' r r CO COY Xal ®\ C C1 Y A- 0 d m a 0• ..`. O Cs To' O 'o n 3 Cl) a c 2 ' fn C m m O O C1 o O - m C0 3 p Cin p c E L L ` V N a m — C Ca C! a C O W GI E c ° y v •. n. m c w o d .. -, Iii 1 1 : 1 APR — 3 2008 I 7 . < <.�# <� ice~' - < •'' �.+MSCy,( k"dA '+} S ,S M < N sCr .<,��,<>•<.wr x��`Y'<� f�3-S C\t¢' vi U°J�.M.✓ .5 i;y aSit ♦y Q' r.n •N >i "3 t - �1 k r 37 D R >C 'AS' ,{ .... 'rr . �.5:.$v tLY�§.,.:.$;{o.` ....t`<� ''�u as 6...,.WeaR. ' �J�.t�`n dl. 4��eJY/, sa6 .:..a'k-".:.a. fr.CL.'r4,t)"sha ih:i<'PG.4'�M.'v...?;.e., ..�: .r f�:b.��4sh6..« .v9 Entrance Hole Cut-outs Trace on to wood with carbon paper. Wrens, chickadee & nuthatches Western Bluebird and Tree Swallow di% Purple Marlin rk • Northern Flicker American Kestrel Cut oft this point after drilling holes Screech Owl and Saw-whet Owl 3.5" —> F- Wood Duck The entrance hole for Violet-green Swallows is an oval shape, 7/8" high and 3.5"wide.A diamond-pattern could also be used with the same dimensions. ,1 3,5" 8. References (The) Audubon Society Guide to Attracting Birds by Stephen Kress, 1985. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY. (TheJ Birdhouse Book by Don McNeil, 1979. Pacific Search Press, 222 Dexter Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109. Building Birdhouses and Feeders by Ed and Stevie Baldwin, 1985. Doubleday and Co, Inc., Garden City, New York, NY. Cavity-Nesting Birds of North American Forests by Scott Virgil et al, 1977. Agriculture Handbook 511, U.S. Forest Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. (The) Complete Book of Birdhouse Construction for Woodworkers by Scott Campbell, 1984. Dover Publications, Inc. New York, NY. (A) Field Guide to Western Birds' Nests. by Hal Harrison, 1979. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. Homes for Birds by Daniel Boone, 1979. Conservation Bulletin 14, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Composition, U.S. Government Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. How to Attract, House and Feed Birds by Walter Schultz, 1970. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. How to Control House Sparrows by Don Grussing, 1980. Roseville Publishing House, P.O. Box 8083, Roseville, MN 55113. This urban wildlife publication"was funded by the Washington Department of r, Wildlife's Nongame Program and Wildlife Education Program, through the sale of person ; I jai 1 abzed license plates . • UI Produced by Donn&Gleisner; Text by:Stephen Penland.an.d.Donn' a Gleisner, -Artwork by Nicola.Yarbrough . First printing 1988, 15K, Second printing 1990, 10K; Third printing 1992,•10K Tho Washington Department of Male will provide equal opportunities to all Washington Department of Wildlife potential and existing employees without regard to race,weed,color,sex,sexual oriontelion,religion.ape,marital status,national origin,doabdiy,or Vietnam Eta Veteran's status.The department receives Federal Aid for fish and widhle restoration. a Serving Washington's Tito department Is subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and •use Q�$ Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,which prohibits discrimination on the basis or Will rill fit and people-- tace,color,national origin or handicap. It you believe you have been dsedminated against In any department program,activity.or toddy,or II you wand further inlornution about Titio VI or Section 504,write to:Mice at Equal Opportunity,U.S.Department of lnteriot, 'f il ii ow and in the Wnshington,O.C.20240,or Washington Dope/anent of Wldlita,600 Capitol Way N. eliu11 w` Olympia WA 99501-1091. future �. .>: —. I t , - 17 A E,'"^\i i list.(,.. APR - 3 2008 , )nvENT I Standard Conditions for Residential Development in Jefferson County 1. LIGHTING: Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when-such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 2. BUILDING HEIGHT: The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 3. OUTDOOR STORAGE: Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 4. UNLICENSED VEHICLES: Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 5. PARKING: A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 6. This permit has been reviewed consistent with JCC 18.40.130 & 140. Notice: this permit does not excuse the applicant from complying with other local, state and federal ordinances, regulations or statues, applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Future development beyond that specified in this permit shall require further review. 7. BMPs: The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine 2013-03-07_SFR_StdConditions 3/7/2013 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:57 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737 Nason Comments Zoe: I have reviewed the Revised Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers, received February 20, 2008. I have the following comments: • I am finding that the figures included in biological reports do not always match the plan sheets submitted for the project. The mitigation plan says that the wetland buffer will be reduced to 69 feet. I suggest that you confirm that the plan sheets show the same buffer reduction. • I recommend the following two comments be added as conditions of approval: o The project biologist must flag or stake the 69-foot reduced wetland buffer and a silt fence shall be installed along the outer edge of the buffer. Prior to beginning any ground-disturbing activities, Jefferson County Department of Community Development shall be contacted to review the location and installation of the silt fence. Contact Zoe Ann Lamp [or Donna, I'm okay with either]after the silt fence has been installed at 360-379-4450 to schedule the verification. o Bird boxes installed in the reduced wetland buffer shall be constructed as specified in Appendix F of the revised report received February 20, 2008. Installation of any bird boxes that deviate from those specifications and have the potential to be used by non-native birds are prohibited in the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any questions, Donna. 4/14/2008 Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:44 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: Nason SPAAD Comments Correct, the March 4th site plan is the current site plan. Thank you! Zoe Ann From: Linda Atkins Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:41 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: Nason SPAAD Comments I got a revised easement document from Tanya and have had a chance to review it. It is correct now and she plans to record it and get it in to us. I will sign off on the SPAAD based on the site plan recvd March 4th 2008 (is that the most recent???) and receipt of the recorded easement. thanks Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 j4lways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIO&VTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited if you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail .system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 92.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including WV 42..56. From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:21 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: Nason SPAAD Comments Nancy Woffenden just called asking about the status of your comments on the Nason SPAAD. How's it coming? I forgot to ask you yesterday when we were talking other issues. Thank you! Zoe Ann 3/25/2008 Page 2 of 2 .......... ....... .. From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:33 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Nason SPAAD Comments Just following up on the Nason SPAAD comments. How's it coming? I had to send an additional info request because the Habitat Management Plan did come close to matching the revised site plan. Do you have anything that needs to be conveyed to them? How's the review coming? Please advise. Thanks! Zoe Ann 3/25/2008 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 5:25 PM To: ryan @tillmanengineering.com Cc: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Nason Ryan, I left you a voice mail message but thought I'd try this too. I misread the FEMA info regarding the Nason Site and as currently shown on the revised SPAAD site plan the tanks are just outside the 100 year flood zone, but they do need to be moved to 5' from the property line. So as I said they never did need the flood certificate for the SPAAD but also won't need it for the septic permit if you move the tanks to show them the same as the revised SPAAD plan and 5' from the property lines. Here is link to the county map site so you can see where the line is. http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp_esa Sorry for the mistake. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(M) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN 42.56 Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy for for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56. 12/6/2007 Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) [Gretchen.Kaehler @DAHP.wa.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 6:35 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Susan Porto; Al Scalf Subject: FW: SEP06-180, 181 Portage Way Zoe, I forgot to copy you. With the new datasharing agreement in place we can look forward to not having this particular situation again! Thanks, Gretchen Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist, Local Governments Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Olympia Ph:360-586-3088 Ce11:360-628-2755 From: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 6:29 PM To: Porto, Susan (DOHi) Cc: ascalf @co.jefferson.wa.us Subject: RE: SEP06-180, 181 Portage Way Hi Susan, Sorry it took so long. The archaeologist contact me today and says she has everything she needs so we have no problem with you finishing the approval process on this. Thank you for asking. It has been a pleasure working with you and Jefferson County. I look forward to more in the future but hopefully not like this one! Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist, Local Governments Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Olympia Ph:360-586-3088 Ce11:360-628-2755 From: Susan Porto [mailto:sporto @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:27 PM To: Kaehler, Gretchen (DAHP) Cc: john fleming; Charles Law; Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: SEP06-180, 181 Portage Way Gretchen, I was contacted to do a pressure test on the septic system for the above referenced site. I will need confirmation from you, in the record,that the work was permitted to proceed following the investigations that stopped the work. I have not heard anything. The system is now installed and the RV is connected to the septic system. I will not allow final approval lacking feedback from you. Please 11/8/2010 Page 2 of 2 forward information appropriate for our files to assure this system received your blessing for installation. Thanks, Susaw Porto R.S. Jef fersow Couwto PubLLc I-teaLth Pliowe 360.3869.404 FAX 360. 339.448y- ALwafJs Worle%wq fora safer F, I-teaLthier)effersow COUwtg CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 11/8/2010 Y ?hJ//1 \ IS t . ' I S • p- 1 4 , _' ;: i-1 Cs i \' j . •.�� \\ f ` . I I i ,,,,, , . r of , ` . _ �`.0,_ 1 t s • ■ IN w Igor__ . 1� - T:47-...A 1 l° li.' ........, OS O II IA O . . , . t, r 0$a '� 1 ..— A I - . 1.. i, -'.;14i.:,,,„''," ''•- '''r- „ .. . , C.--4.•„it.'",- $'-, • ' . .'.,2_, . ' - J "s' ' MEN ' ''"'"::V1/4-vti-,- --•--, :::- - 'in. : -,. ...,,, - ... ■ I '''" . ' -.; —v---- ''" - ''' . • 11 sr _ , . • ; . ' ' * ale.0"." s`, ft. anall•=MN , • '• ., .,),AL i lift 11N, \ t . ... . . 1, . • ...•t. -,A, . i .,... •'. . st I . , 61011 it I , I - . 1 . -.. s ___.... ...., — A . P--,4, C " ?"'"• . AA. ■ 1 A —oh.... • • • I . ...., 1 N. ---r---- . --- ...t.;:.. .. 111 1 , 4 . c . .... ) • .1.* .1., ... 41 ' * . irk . 4.1.1.111e: C ,,....4,,. • ' . ',-,---,,,---, • •. - ,..,,,/,-1.,,-t. • 1 '1 'I..A. r .i.,. - . , . tit,ifir 424 -. /. r 1 ,. , 1 , . ••,, ,.., := wo.,„ii - - • • . • • / . , . , 0 , \ , - / \ 4 \ . . I 1 !/I \,, _______ ■ / 1 , • . A , 0 - , . , ... . . , • 4 -P • t \ / . // ; ..; ., ‘ — • f 'lie • - . / 4 r''' . • i . . . . i i • ■ . ■ IF ' ■■■■•■■•■••■■•• . •: ? . 1.. . . . • ..".• M -l//¢ ✓4^ )lyAY.-r\ r 'r�1 °4,d.-'7 d ia" /N ' f• t• T♦, . a i • - tF♦ o• TIC Y"ff T .(-1. -(,,,444 t • �•" ' # r• '.•- e A ra•1r)h•t ~'�Y * •w Yl�,t v M1. ) .r - • a yy a §4.14 L /++, � _ °ti's •, .� r -} . $ R J } • r'', • • • _ '/bn. v ' .� Y; Pty �, •• r t.71'1, ' •' Ta _MX • \ a`t IS l 1' Y _ J l r� • R - r .411f- Ill rt' \ l. ,• — 4, . • ''- yy"" 1 V 4 * l 'err . €• .'r ii.,';‘" w; r .y.. of i• i 4 s " -Cl .gyp .+ y.','-,'4'07, j „ n f tolr,„ A Y• f . ».,4 • ,,,,fie , ( . 4" _I. . . ✓J 1J . , 9• 4 t '..44...If.' 7 .. '3' ti. ' r .• 1.71t 'dire r'Jr- .," ri • rl / %of 4 ....... . . .,,,.. • l* T 'r 'a + J g ,a r. • +,t'r:.. Vii•. . . •• '• "'P. !r ` *.. +ytt�,.`f•: d - Rrt, yk � } : `7" , '/,,/ j .• "9 , ,A.,..,4- . 'kt''‘*- ri4 w.... „".i. .. ..-4 "'"',4k, ,. ,....,,A,: .241r4;m,,,** ,., .,:,...440* .6.;lie 1 T [ 7t ' ;1 ,1,,,„.'"'''.: .M • 4 k : 4 ..• .y r , -4' t '3 j . 1 if � z �rt r 4 N ! A or L.'"L; r 4 _ • ,,; } t l 0 "V \ , ; , 'l l h ' ' t., i ;�t •••-• r 'i 1 r, s A rIII t I r• I xw. + _ •t•y .,`Y. to. 1 •A°L r. • • , A 1 7 N r likt, + slit.....4•A r .; ? �,�,; I l• • " '. r rw• ik I I (1 .. t . • • R erL . a"` r ■ 4. . .� ;. ,� ty ' Al r♦_f._ `e jpp. � 13 ` ftA { ; • S IN • . . ', -' : '''''‘' ....1 l' N'::11. i � a •1 . t R • •. t .to ... . I • r t x �� .44.l ., xx.F.tc . .e (j Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:54 PM To: Stacie Hoskins; Al Scalf Cc: Susan Porto; Randy Marx; Donna Frostholm Subject: FW: ZON05-59, SEP06-180, 181 Portage Way. Importance: High Stacie and Al, FYI! How should we proceed? Randy, do you know which parcel? Is it the below parcel next to the county park or the upper parcel owned by the Nasons? Zoe Ann From: Randy Marx Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 2:39 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp; Donna Frostholm; JsfEng; Susan Porto Subject: ZON05-59, SEP06-180, 181 Portage Way. Hi All I received a call today from the septic system installer that human bones were uncovered during part of the septic system installation referenced above. I told him he need needs to stop digging, he said he had and was already packing up. Tim of Bernt Ericson Excavation is the contact. 301-0444 Cc: SEP06-180, File Wiresx Always Working Fora Safer& HealthierJefferson County 360 385 9444 ><((((°> K{(C' ><((((0> ><((((0> x{{{"> ><W> ><((((0> ><((((°> '></((((0> ><>x>' x{((">>c»<>><((((°> .><{({{(">><{{{"> x{{{^> > > x>" x{({">' . ><((((°> ><l ((l >. . ><((((0>. ><l l l l >. ><((((°> ><{{f> ><((«°> Environmental Health On-Site Web Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message 5/24/2010 Zoe Ann Lamp From: john fleming [john.jsf.engineering @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 5:05 AM To: Susan Porto Cc: Donna Frostholm; Zoe Ann Lamp; Charles Law; Charles Law 2; Tim Thomas; Fred Nason; Linda Atkins Subject: Re: SEP06-180, ZON05-00059, 181 Portage Way, Pt Hadlock john will be back to wa may 30. he is able to be reached by phone and email.thank you. sorry for any inconvenience this presents. on 5/18/10, Susan Porto <sporto @co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: > I also visited the site, apparently after Zoe and Donn, and noted that > the tanks were being installed. I have not received a notification that > the system is being installed. > Susan > From: Donna Frostholm > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 5:13 PM > To:john fleming; Zoe Ann Lamp; Charles Law; Charles Law 2; Tim Thomas; > Fred Nason; Linda Atkins; Susan Porto > Subject: RE: SEPo6-18o, ZON05-00059, 181 Portage Way, Pt Hadlock > John: > Jefferson County received the email below on Monday morning (we are > still closed on Fridays). Zoe and I went to the property this morning > to review the reduced wetland buffer flagging and consider the issues > you raised about silt fencing. 1 Page 1 of 3 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 5:13 PM To: john fleming; Zoe Ann Lamp; Charles Law; Charles Law 2; Tim Thomas; Fred Nason; Linda Atkins; Susan Porto Subject: RE: SEP06-180, ZON05-00059, 181 Portage Way, Pt Hadlock John: Jefferson County received the email below on Monday morning (we are still closed on Fridays). Zoe and I went to the property this morning to review the reduced wetland buffer flagging and consider the issues you raised about silt fencing. When we arrived, people were working on the property and much of the septic system had already been installed. The permit conditions were very clear. Do you know why installation of the septic system began without either(1) meeting the permit requirements or(2) providing Jefferson County will an opportunity to consider your request? Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Specialist Jefferson County DCD From: john fleming [mailto:john.jsf.engineering @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:44 AM To: Donna Frostholm; Zoe Ann Lamp; Charles Law; Charles Law 2; Tim Thomas; Fred Nason; Linda Atkins; Susan Porto Subject: Re: SEP06-180, ZON05-00059, 181 Portage Way, Pt Hadlock PS-the depth of the tanks is proposed to be very shallow, 51" at the septic tank inlet side, to allow the outlet pipe to be at grade, so the tank wall/lid joint is 9" +/- above existing grade. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM,john fleming <john.jsfengineering@gmail.com>wrote: Good Morning Donna& Zoe: I have staked the location for the septic and pump tanks at 181 Portage Way, Port Hadlock for Charles and Rosewary Law. The tanks are staked 15' in from the south and east property lines, to allow the water line to go outside of the 10' setback from the tanks, and be within their property. The distance from the OHWM at the toe of the rip-rap to the edge of the staked location of the tanks is 56' or more. From the top of the rip-rap the tanks are 50'. The tanks are proposed to be in line, instead of side by side. The transport pipe from the tanks up to the off-site drainfield will parallel the existing water line as it runs west from the tanks, and as it passes by the water meter, will angle to the south property line and hug Fred Nason's south property line, along the north side of the existing vegetation once up on the terrace containing the proposed drainfield. The drainfield and its proposed easement still have stakes from Tillman's work. This is notification to you that I have flagged the edge of the previously delineated wetland that runs roughly parallel to the west property line of the Law parcel. I have flagged the 65' wetland buffer for your inspection and approval. There was a condition in the septic permit to follow conditions of the SPAAD. The SPAAD had conditions that the wetland buffer be flagged, then call DCD out to determine placement of a silt fence. 5/24/2010 Page 2 of 3 Within the Law parcel, there is a ridge or crest running in the north-south direction, starting from about 75' east of the southwest property corner, then running north. From this high spot, the ground slopes approximately 1%to the east, and 2%to the west. There is another grade break roughly 5' to 10' east of the edge of the wetland that slopes to the west at approximately 45%. All work east of the crest described above would not need a silt fence to control any run-off, because the ground slopes away from the wetland. Once at the west side of the Law parcel into the woody vegetaion, the transport pipe is planned to be installed by hand digging 12" down with a 6" wide trenching spade, laying a 1" diameter polyethylene pressure effluent sewer pipe, and immediately backfilling. Installing the transport pipe will be about the same ground disturbance as digging in a silt fence! With this dry weather, and the short period of time the trench will be open, I do not believe a silt fence will have a positive impact on the control of sediment from reaching the wetland. However, if you determine that a silt fence is necessary, I have placed three pink and black striped plastic ribbon into the ground, paralleling the transport pipe route within the Law parcel- one at the west property line, one about 25' to the east of the first ribbon, and a third ribbon 50' to the east of the second ribbon, approximately 15' north of the south property line. Please reply to all of the email address this message was sent to when you have finished your assessment for silt fencing. Sincerely, John Fleming, PE Principal Civil Engineer JSF Engineering 1240 W. Sims Way #45 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-452-8500 800-248-6008 use for voice and texting. For messages, please use email: j ohn.i s£engineering@gmail.com jsfEngna,olvnen.com Sincerely, John Fleming, PE Principal Civil Engineer JSF Engineering 1240 W. Sims Way #45 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-452-8500 5/24/2010 • Page 3 of 3 800-248-6008 use for voice and texting. For messages, please use email: j ohn.j s£engineeringa gmail.com jsfEngaolypen.com 5/24/2010 Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 8:34 AM To: 'john fleming' Cc: Susan Porto; Linda Atkins; Donna Frostholm Subject: RE: Zon05-00059, Charles Law, 181 Portage Way, PH John, I did get your message but I was in meetings all afternoon yesterday. Conditions 13 & 14 (copied and pasted below) of the SPAAD state: 13. THE PROJECT BIOLOGIST MUST FLAG OR STAKE THE 65-FOOT REDUCED WETLAND BUFFER AND A SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE OUTER EDGE OF THE BUFFER. 14. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONTACTED TO REVIEW THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE SILT FENCE. CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION AFTER THE SILT FENCE HAS BEEN INSTALLED AT 360-379-4450 TO SCHEDULE THE VERIFICATION." The Habitat Management Plan submitted for the SPAAD was done by Lori Bernsten with GeoEngineers. After GeoEngineers has staked the buffer and the silt fence has been installed, contact DCD Staff Biologist, Donna Frostholm, to check the location and proper installation. She can be reached at 360-379-4466. I think this answers the questions you had for me. Let me know if I missed something. Zoe Ann From:john fleming [mailto:john.jsf.engineering @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 8:09 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp; Linda Atkins; Susan Porto Subject: Zon05-00059, Charles Law, 181 Portage Way, PH Good Morning Zoe: I left yi voice mail yesterday. Tim Thomas of Bernt Ericsen Excavating is planning to start the installation of the septic system for SEP06-00180 on APN 962-700-108 next week. I was out yesterday to stake it preliminarily. I observed a few problem areas. According to the SPAAD, he was supposed to contact DCD for directions on location of installing silt fenced. In the area of the transport pipe going past the wetland southern tip, the excavation will be by hand for minimal soil and vegetation disturbance. 5/5/2010 Page 2 of 2 The tanks will be located 15' west of the east property line, giving them 56' from the apparent high water mark of the shoreline to the east. The elevation of the tanks will be set so that the inlet invert of the septic tank will be at existing grade elevation. This will put the tank wall to lid joint at approximately 9" above the existing ground surface. We found amongst the thick rose bushes and scotch broom old stakes set by Tillman Engineering for the west side of the drainfield easement, and the drainfield, 40' x 20'. The plans call for a 40' x 16'primary. Or a 40' x 26' with reserve area. Construction access is planned to take out the 4th apple tree west of Fred Nason's driveway, and come in with dump trucks on the north side of the biofilter, south of the planned location of Fred's biofilters. It is planned to have the water service line abandoned and re-routed around the east side of the new tanks on Charles'parcel. If you have any questions, please email. Thanks, John Sincerely, John Fleming, PE Principal Civil Engineer JSF Engineering 1240 W. Sims Way#45 Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-452-8500 800-248-6008 use for voice and texting. For messages,please use email: johnj sf.engineering(n,gmail.com jsfEngnolypen.com 5/5/2010 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 8:36 AM To: Colleen Zmolek; Al Scalf; David W. Johnson; Donna Frostholm; Frank Benskin; Jim Coyne; Joel Peterson; Lisa Yobbagy-Keller; Michael Hoskins; Michelle Farfan; Michelle McConnell; Stacie Hoskins Cc: Randy Marx; Susan Porto; Linda Atkins; Trish Grant Subject: POD for Wednesday, May 5 I will take walk-ins between 1:30 - 4:30. Please transfer all phone calls to Colleen at extension 462. Thank you! Have a wonderful day! Zoe Ann 5/5/2010 • - •'''. 4111* .tyin... ••• A it 1 g •• •117—MI.nib , ' St' 44' . °I.Ceile r,"&.V. ...1.14.41e....- lik . • - 51-7 .11:•.-f' 4 •*1;F. u' k ip.... ....:. i. _ . • . .• 4,....: , 7- :0. or,.. • 11—: • k ' el'. Ne ilk• ...Ir. "s• -.:• . ..... ...., f" ■ ': • t, .. f • • • • , •'ilk, 44.3%. :('' .- • . 4111i. fie .•.. 4,• •:. . ..'.111 4"1:; •..• A... , .... ... . -:,.....„..1... .• • . .,.....„.• : • . .• .‘,. . . . .., , . . • , „ . „wit, - • . . ....... .., _„.. .... ::o .. r•gio. ok_r- • .... . ,. d . ''1*.••;.' -II, '.0 ss 1 ' . ." `. ' •.... ''.."'" .4./1' '44. 4,,k 4Z-1444,, .414' , ,,., ., . A,.•,,„ • , • . :141 ":II.. L1 ' % ' -WIllit Sig t's ..1., .:4`-‘ ' s t ' 01 4 .. 4 . • . k‘‘'' ' • .;: .;!.'•'. .... ' Al 4 t . ill•, ,4" 4 ',. 11._.e.-4.-4 • \ . . ■•4 4. — ' 4.( . ...I...ei' - . " I ‘ ! .. %. • . 1. i !,,k 116 4,1. • • •• • •• $ -. • " .C. •7. 1' • . , . ' 4 1 ' 114•• . /• • - , . • . • . .. . ...r.v, , 1 '‘.• ....94,11e- t • ... )1104 4 air-.:4Nr •...,- * .,, . i . . . .- . tt ••• -7.iitir )t .y". IN;"1"' , ..1 . . . -ddirtiyak 4.... - '" o- . ,, 41.', •.i 41:'kk.- '74. .' ; . . -, r tA . . # . •V-W. 4 )1 .1. i4'. p•-t .4. •'.. 4 '4 .• 4- a • —:';;i6 ' .r.,' ,.. .-. .4, • . • 4 . '. : .'4 ,'• •-!.4, r -11!;•-•i4/ •. .1•.-r.: ' • - . . . , • • . ' ',.,ve . ..s.:... • . , :..r•-• . - .••.--I. ••• 1' :' . k N . , •. '..‘t "• ' -.. , . .. • . - •% . / . • ,,'J1' t:•'... .. . ,,:44 „I 1 , . , 4 . • , e .,41111 .,....` ., 4 .. ■ , ,. •... ' .. - '''..4•4444••01.— --'.'.. .." A.N ,‘ ' 1.,...,,..., "144 . . ...4- ■ ■ .k. • . % . . . . . . • ..11'''- . 't: '. '• ') . 1 . ' _ 1 4"t••-/,• •„, , ,i , ,.. . „, . • - , ., 4 • .4 ' ''' A ..1' 1'.."--: :;k*, `:' ' 1. .` -;*,... '': .,' • • ( ,. ,•-• : . . .4,t /' 44'4 ' : ? ci • 4,v - , - . 4. -.'-' ' ' • 4 1 4 '01, . I • - ,. IP "4 ' " 44- ';/44' < —, '. .4 '' • t I . , ,• 4. . . . ...„ ..,.44 ' •tY •• . • , . . , , -\ e"• NI '4 1 '— .. , , . ., - 1 ' .. , ..1t,, 4 . . . • 4 t 4 • 4 • - ' '.! ' ' `.• -.It "4:.- --t . • ,,...4L. , • - .-- r, ( • . - , I I ' '41...' '.15't ,' •' f.i Nr:.n.tl • 14`'s'i ‘.> . ..k, . s;,-'!. .; ,, • . ,.- 4 4, • . ,•, , .,-.„. 1,-;-.-: .. , v . ,. ,. - • . . . . , , ... • . - • . • . • . . . . ... ! • • . .. .......„. , .... .. ..._ , ... . . , . . , - - 1 • w YA {; r f }4 yy iE ,.�- QI 1 :t ' I ,'''.17.. i".!_;" 'N 5� .M,,....-'-;:. E �4,. L 3� "+� `yam ' F en' �- a k+ .JI. ,� T �p i, �'xY ! +t ^ r x A C "N s .+" * L .a fi /•' 'a q4-. a . It ' �. iJ is .lP :c�" ` 1 '$u rte h . . , C+ ' ""ham-'^ .1. �r9w • B iro • • s u l dR 7 ti■ rk .!1 r ■. $'.' 1 •' ,t ' ..-'41.' 't.:':T '' '',,T-.. . . r ' -, ' ' 4•1"...). . '..:.■•• '' ' . '''' '''' . *-• -4.' - ' i 4f, 1144 . , 4 ir•.,.•. . ,. , . , , • . . ... . ;... 3-. ;•;,.. 4.... • • -• . •• e. •.,-, --.4.,%2t.--.`f 44 ' -,..1- '•,,'F '''' '.''' .; liso, 4.1.. . . „'' le, :".....,,*. 7"'"'":51'''''' 1.; '' '-, '..,-,- r "Y.0 .it;..L. . '..,,,,••IS • - -— -- '4 1'',*'''. • '... ' ' * .'*•4i'. ' *''-. .., . • , ;FS..r• ,,,... .s.,.' a,.„. }.,.. , ..., ,-,••..,....44.4.0.°4 ' ...:,..i r ...4! ,,,..r ' '''' .,..., , ... - ''''°.... 44 ”. '. : '• -% ' ''.1.4; . 1::'401. "..'.41lie . ' ' ■ ■ *.. ••4" , 'I,r ,.t-;,,-, ....t...:•• • .-:,...-....:-..4 i -, . .,#):. , . .-, ,... .. . .. . . .. .... .., ,,.., • ' ' . . ., . • %;.;t1:t'1,•-•';7 :- '''..•': '' ' '.. A ' •L'* ''!‘‘, ''• ' : I • - .., ----,:.,,,, „f..,4, - . .,.-:14,.., ..44:, - ' ,- ; 174„,t; -•. • ,.' -".7-Att: '• . - -: 'n" .' ,,'-'-::,,r •.r . • -.4ft ' - -~' ' ' " ' '''.4.;',:.'"" S., -c,* ' 4 •''''''■ ..."• .4?r •. . . . . . . • ,...... , . -:- ',,t " 4'.',.u...1‘...:4,:'," '' ' P v . . ,'• Iri'"if. . ,- ■ ......4!: ....if".! , .tit.:,..;4-......,... --,P, . -,., -. . - ••„. . ..- . or ..4............ - ... . . . . .. .. . ,. , ,,t,. . . .. .•, - , „t ,..40 • . '4".t,” •.- .- . " -,,., , , , , t .C7 - f' ,-, ...,',.tfr .. . . -.ill ., ,.. 1:;sas ). - .._ , . .4 . . . -_ .. . . , ... ..... • q . . , *.y.• , , t,..." „...-, . - _..... _ .. . -',,.--.::.-. . .'.. -. . *,..- •.....-- . . . .. - • .... .. . — . . . ,... . . ...":: , . . . - . -•f.' . . _ ... , . ,-.' •, • . , , - •. - , . _ . ..-.. ... •. . ....... . ... - C .. , . . . . . . . . — .... - . . ' . an . . . , 4 '- i • LB> ' . . . • , . .... . , . . . . ' . . • • ' ': v..;.-"• ' ..-...... § . : . . . , - . . . . ... , . .• ,.. , ... . . . • - .. • ),"' ., , i Tit. 1., ... . .. • t. .,-.: . . .. . i• . .-.% ..., .. . : ,,,. .„;-1 ., _ , . . , . . : • . r --1, • . . .',J, , ,.-, . , -- -At._ .. , . . .. . ,.. ..... . ...,.,: ,,,, :i.. . t. ...„,. ..•-• .. , .-,... .„ - 5., ,4. - s • • ,..,..., Al. • . ,., ,,, •• .4 fr T - .... .... . I Ti zh.,•. ... - , ' .., '‘ ' r ' ..,.7, .-e,''-. :-• ,2, .. ... , _.... -.. ...• 4 •• , .,:-........ - - — •.1 .< , . > • .\ • , ,. .11firt,•..„ - • • . -•.• - ---- / : - . • -k.A. ..• • .., • . ,,t, .■ , .. - . . - • ." ': ' ' • 7*, ••• . . 1 •' '- 1 •• : e*,•••:;. < ) ' , • 'I.•', • • .. • - ? i , . . -..- - '' ; '1,7W.•'''.•) • . 'I Alt t . , , . . m. • / . ,, , _, jaAjJ T �� 1. „.%— .L - �± 7 t T - ly .. y 1' 4:a. re 4 .4.+* t.• '.••-- /' .4 r •77f 7-.' � . p,a 9Q' - , ♦ .. -.,./. 204:. L s*—_,�y `� ,' R iy .. ,'1 1 % • _14! �. �� .mot �r� ,' s`- , T t r � 7 r ,om Ai •y :ti � litt;, St �. t �../ y ` ;'". ' %- .+c •J 7 ' 1 R it e z f k1p/R f7 � I i i µµµ s ..` dx- . . � ' 1- Yee. . _ .r• +L 4 -.k ..44 .L .F •rr N '7 ltt y 1; Dt0 ,i, ■ 'y a.. J•' 4.. ' .,Y , ON JEFFERSON COUNTY 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o. 621 Sheridan Street �<gS, NG,sO$ Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director March 25, 2008 Dear Re r, RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review.and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or byApril 8, 2008. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact Z LAMP at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Aie.(A) kirriP n- Arm Lamp Building P-2rmits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 1.3 c OG T.e �� qs JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director February 15, 2008 Nancy L. Woffenden Hadlock Realty & Development Co 211 Chimacum Rd. Port Had lock, WA 98339 RE: Comments from Jefferson County Public Works Department Case: MLA05-00737 Dear Nancy: This letter is being addressed to you as your name appears as the designated agent on the Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination (SPAAD) application. I have cc'd Fred and Judy Nason, Tanya Royer, Charles and Rosemary Law to keep everyone informed. I received the attached comments from the Jefferson County Public Works Department. Please review. No response is required. Sincerely, /'"� .e Ann Lamp ssociate Planner cc: Charles and Rosemary Law Fred and Judy Nason Linda Atkins Tanya Royer Jim Pearson — Public Works Terry Duff— Public Works Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 e-mail: ascalf @co.jefferson.wa.us FAX: (360) 379-4451 Page l of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Jim Pearson Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:10 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Cc: Jackie Meister Subject: ZON05-00059 SPAAD for 181 Portage Way; APN 962700108 Zoe, The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed residential development of Parcel #962700108 at 181 Portage Way under Jefferson County Site Plan Approval Advance Determination ZON05-00059. The Department has the following comments regarding the continued access to the site. Portage Way County Road provides access to the site and to Lower Oak Bay County Park. The road segment adjacent to the site is subject to periodic damage when storm waves and high tides over-top the riprap bulkhead that protects the road and deposit gravel and drift wood. The road surface has o been damaged by upward water pressure from high tides and storm surges. Currently, the Public Works Department removes debris from the roadway after storm events. However, the time it takes to accomplish this varies depending on the severity of the storm event, damage to other County Roads, and the availability of maintenance crews and equipment. Because of this situation, Lower Oak Bay County Park is closed to over-night use from October 31 to May 1. The structural integrity of the riprap protecting Portage Way has been compromised by storms in recent years. It is anticipated that this will continue in the future. The frequency and severity of this damage may be exacerbated by anticipated sea level rise. Due to financial constraints the Public Works Department does not plan to repair the bulkhead. Due to environmental constraints the Department may not be able to obtain the various local, State, and Federal permits required to repair the bulkhead in the future. Jim Pearson Jefferson County Public Works Department PO Box 2070 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9162 (360) 385-92345 Fax c: Portage Way Road File, CR 575609 2/15/2008 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:57 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737 Nason Comments Zoe: I have reviewed the Revised Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers, received February 20, 2008. I have the following comments: • I am finding that the figures included in biological reports do not always match the plan sheets submitted for the project. The mitigation plan says that the wetland buffer will be reduced to 69 feet. I suggest that you confirm that the plan sheets show the same buffer reduction. • I recommend the following two comments be added as conditions of approval: o The project biologist must flag or stake the 69-foot reduced wetland buffer and a silt fence shall be installed along the outer edge of the buffer. Prior to beginning any ground-disturbing activities, Jefferson County Department of Community Development shall be contacted to review the location and installation of the silt fence. Contact Zoe Ann Lamp [or Donna, I'm okay with either] after the silt fence has been installed at 360-379-4450 to schedule the verification. o Bird boxes installed in the reduced wetland buffer shall be constructed as specified in Appendix F of the revised report received February 20, 2008. Installation of any bird boxes that deviate from those specifications and have the potential to be used by non-native birds are prohibited in the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any questions, Donna. 3/13/2008 JEFFERSON COUNTY 1.1N 006� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti k 621 Sheridan Street ' p� Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director March 14, 2008 NANCY WOFFENDEN HADLOCK REALTY 211 CHIMACUM RD. PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 181 PORTAGE WAY CASE#: MLA05-00737 Dear NANCY WOFFENDEN: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project The revised site plan and the Habitat Management Plan are inconsistent with each other. Examples of some of the inconsistencies 1) The revised Buffer Enhancement Plan (Appendix C of the Revised Report Habitat Enhancement Plan) shows a previous site plan. The site plan in the Revised Report is one that was submitted to our department on October 1, 2007. It appears that our discussions on October 29, 2007 were not addressed in this report. 2) Page 7 of the Revised Report says, "Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet with a five foot building setback". The current site plan clearly shows a 65 foot setback (not 74 ft). Please work with GeoEngineers to submit an addendum to their report that addresses the current proposal. I do not have comments from Linda Atkins, Environmental Health, regarding the new site plan. As soon as I receive them I will contact you. Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by June 12, 2008. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90) calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, / dir De ent of Commune y D velopment Staff c: File Tanya iRoyer FRED P NASON eund Svdy MciScrc■ ChgrteS'+ Roseme.n 1-0-0 Geo Ent,ne.e.r5 z g o � -6 25 Z 0 ° -0 ° 0 p ��" � zo *m * o °0 -1 o ° a n i mo � �W � z° R o � � c o o 0 ° ° �n73 M z v° (m o m 0 r-P0 o V' °rn RR m L m PJ 5j 1 * z�z z - CD� z Z m c mF 0 )._,3 0 ' ` 4 -10,0 NN A p F'. 2 i OO p m wmrn Z �•0m > m � 0K0� co coo o w og�Z Jo Zz �> Z ° o `L Dnm � -4n .0 .0 _0 c°;= u > °moo -DI '{ m° � crm -;oN M j � �Z -n fi -So -lo --to r OV to mmCXII r rOr (nNC =��5 � -lin m m . m74Z —zi 0N � 14140p,►O� o IIV∎ -+ ,,iOR '��,� RTy 206 3 , m mo 71 , ,� 30e 00, 3 °Z* cno 0 z_ D = ,�� SST co o / CI (D9 00 DAN �,„�+' ,, o 71 1-T1 Tv 0 hI ., � moo -o .♦� cn �♦ cn 00 o 1 rho ■ S cn 7 zm1 co \ OAT ` J >c zzo h' � mo� 30, m 206 ' 00' U)Z D 96%0 Z o 9 ' oo>> . I. II CAI dl! n Om ._t m -o ui m ZN I i a Z o h m -? m o co o Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surve ed • . Legend ".. ; „� ;,_!+ n Selected Features „{' 70� i Parceis-H .� r + -'•� t' ' '. FEMA FIRMS L +�E{ jam 1 g 1.. • ANI ) 2006 Aerial Photos . - Boundaries &{r l r bO .c" s r Corti lr) T it • .s, a - , �" . �. 7 Grier Carnes r. •• A- - : „f ... {.... � y � ti itf C0140 Swamies fr5 .... .rat .`:. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Dec 04 10:42:53 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/4/2007 • vg LI 1- sg ' W LL m o,� ,wa O g Eo B$ E S. d w COG L.', N \ RR m Q = m ° Q � 6 8oA n = O U$L" w W U 4 E W i = >' •- pp U E J s C Z Oi W ,° Y ,L b N PD U V O A Lrli 6 m w �' ° E to so .—¢ t" wwwe ZQ o © E c « E E LL ° I s Z cdzi. ��g �i. G w S .. W C��pLL 1 ` IC u T ■° B y °o C Y LL w_a c 8 E „ dvaq w m w • aa §..14 i :A ■ r Gf , y . r ] y J w7 aR esS' a a8 -a + 'a ,. k per[ 8; mud. : M° ' x ::?, 44446. 10AAt ON cs z ,4 ` o-yak f} .4 ,W.,14r'k? �r� p s _ / �f"Y; w k ,4.,„.$4,4t' a M1t F i'.r,E9 aS`t *��..', v .Y '' ,r e 14 <4- 't.-111,ky 40 't sk w faSF a 'i ".yy x ,A�i m '1 I . @ v' �yr .` h f4Si 2f]�.t f i ';. 1 O 5i� v 0 \\ JL 0 n \N & as I b ?r J• A C z=1 ijAA jY �6. iii z N N r• O r I LL r ,--1 1. „ �, up, otn ,� W o f --, zw I t a -- �� _ mi,,,mimimaimvxwm.writuiwzmv.vmmaimaimei........ bk., W W° N — // .,, ,,2 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed / .270109r 962700113 MI10 ` 962700112 e /41 96 „4 C2 962700111 ,`/ �! 962700110 — s'4 Legend C9 0 Selected Features ti4 Ct / Road System 962700107 .• /��..._ Parcels-H 962 ' FEW.FIRMS . A Ain . X500 tc-p 1 Boundaries 996400002 r 9603ooau i O .3clhym Canty 0 996400003 �,, - , I w,� nCava Ca.s ,, 16030000.3 OAOAIVVVI- 1.. 9964000/3 9t i FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Dec 04 10:14:36 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/4/2007 ' Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surve ed fi ,, / d fi AN..YEA` ..w a 'j eejj W T - f: ''''t IF F Legend _ ? 0 Selected Features tor f Road System tem S„ .s., , ' t ” . J Y r----- Parcels-Fl 1 ' Mt�iCirON L l a--' 2006 Aerial Photos •�� �i' •� * .0 = Boundanes ,JACCBSEw DR v \ D V aa J, r :, t'✓.. ,.+ ti OAS RD' A`- } y, 'i: e ..� 1.1] r 'Y.�RF RD 7 ° . +ii, . ' y ' +r 11u , LI xrl(:ui[;C.ataStream OS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Dec 04 10:41:30 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 12/4/2007 ' Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 171,,-;-:-'s, ., J .'y r ti. s t ' i N l i4 n T ? d. ., . , y Z [ • '. o j1 e} � {ii. -. .74 r A a �, Legend 13 Selected Features I` I 1 Parcels-H • N-- s c -%14 , y 2006 Aerial Photos rq ,- _�, v Boundaries 44i�._ �.5 id. .. 17 x.4erem Corey T .i. s o-. ■ �, .r A •s' •Y ! '-;1 f r 1 .. r 1�F y x l� - 1.o aJ:bV J 'Y,a∎ JJr c"L"J.II_ c lit_ )r 1L. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Dec 04 10:42:16 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 12/4/2007 ORCH'\P:\16338001\DD\CAD\1633800100.dwg CJA:BMK 02/27/08 N -• Z O O maJ � 1 I 7 ' g Z b a $ g ' 3 rrnD a m a r 3 3 S = sm 2. a a - m a U C _0 G r*-i * SO c0OO �-� m 1o m t�1 011 r a Z C C O c T7 O O 111 m f9 f*1°Y w p D � 51 '‹ � Z 8 • Z j r� r F. b fi C• � C N C m �2 q w Go CO 46 as 4+ a 0i ti m' 4 w w - -p.to a) a P r % -I Gi Cn V --! O � ?. -0 ' 1 00 c0 0 r� 0 o r, w � •- —•- -� --. i i_ co 9 g n m ao 3 o y .K -r, — -.. 3 C W r. w .-. r--r• . 0. 3 s .r ..■ -a r r r 7 H n 10 ea m {D (A M 7 a k g O O A o `o . y y • N f1 1 I x 1g 3 za. ut c.a Z X1'1 �D ` ' 0 ,-,-, m z m m.. I Illr0g"co 4.0 , m n O 8 �` 0 �'°R - `mn 11 .4 , ry 30• ��33' Z ii* ,.... z -� D o m o �4R�r 00,, m o 1:12 . g+4*-- / i, • _,.. 0 .s.40% ..,, ,:• ,› v, . _ r- Lf1' z m co SSI/V 1 ti(4 4‘ own 0 P. stst41, z ♦ O IF III I ill Z � M m 1 Z `Ap CS2O 1 i +■`■ . . rte Q m o p. 0 CI r r i 0J LP m Ir , 0 •� O 0 T So, J1 m 0 v .7 n o ° A 3,30' cn ?` o 1 a ts) 73 0 3 . 79- QO ' (4 111144 • v -u m R.(0 113 Fs/, V1 n N r�1 I m o o '44) ID co 3 C) 7 3 -Mm-i { ZOO M m m y f'1 0 go Q n z n � � Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 7 / f a 4 1 PORTAGE bVaY `'`-- Legend 3:.ASrIr,cT,,r. i - 0 Selected Feat' 1 Parcels-H P Boundaries v. DCareen i Streams ,vf T}pe9 0 ! Type 5 ." Tom, toe Type { Type 1 s ♦/4/ Gs 0 Culverts 3 0:1:2 . 3 0 34 s 5;8;7 j 8.9 Road Network- 41t I.alt FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Mar 15:02:32 2008 ( ctw S .f- Lo cis http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 3/13/2008 4�g�N c • x 16'111 N 6C JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director February 12, 2008 Nancy L. Woffenden Hadlock Realty & Development Co 211 Chimacum Rd. Port Hadlock, WA 98339 RE: Change of Driveway Location - Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination Case: MLA05-00737 Dear Nancy: This letter is being addressed to you as your name appears as the designated agent on the Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination (SPAAD) application. I have cc'd Fred and Judy Nason, Tanya Royer, Charles and Rosemary Law to keep everyone informed. Rosemary Law contacted me to ask about the process to change the location of the driveway from the east side of the parcel to the south side of the parcel. The following would be required 1) Apply for a new address and road approach. The fee is $156.00. I have attached the applications to this letter. If you have any questions about this please contact Terry Duff at 360-385-9159. 2) The site plan would need to be revised to reflect the new location of the driveway. 3) The habitat management plan would need to be revised to reflect the new location of the driveway. Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 e-mail: ascaif @co.jefferson.wa.us FAX: (360) 379-4451 r Case: MLA05-00737 Page 2 4) Contact Ryan Tillman regarding the new location of the driveway. Will the new location impact the septic design? The septic design would need to reflect the new location of the driveway. If you have questions, please contact me at the above address, by e-mail at zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us or by phone at (360)385-9406. Sincerely, -1— %4' oe Ann Lamp Associate Planner cc: Charles and Rosemary Law Fred and Judy Nason Linda Atkins Tanya Royer Terry Duff 11111! 1111111/111 111111111111 Ill! 1111111 1111 53 2i 432 6 Jefferson County Rud JUDI WITTMRYER 03/25/2008 02:46p ERSE 43.00 NO REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX REQUIRED When recorded return to: JEFFERSON COUNTY TREASURER Richard L. Shaneyfelt BY Attorney at Law 1101 Cherry Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 DECLARATION OF EASEMENT Grantor(s): FRED P. NASON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Dona O. Nason Grantee(s): FRED P. NASON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Dona O. Nason Description of Real Property Affected: Lots 1 and 2, Nason Short Plat PTN Gov't Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29N, Range 1E, WM Assessors Tax Parcel No(s). 962-700-107 and 962-700-108 GRANTOR, FRED P. NASON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Dona O. Nason, Jefferson County Superior Court No. 04-4-00096-0, in anticipation of sale of Lot 2 permitted by Jefferson County upon approval of a planned sewage disposal design, hereby grants, conveys, establishes and, creates an easement for the placement, maintenance, construction, reconstruction, repair and upkeep of a primary and reserve drain field and for septic tanks and sewer lines leading thereto, including the cutting and removal of brush, trees and other obstructions which interfere with the use of said easement, together with the rights of ingress, egress, and regress, over, under, along and across the portions of Lot 1 of the Nason Short Plat per Volume 2 of Short Plats, page 180, situated in Government Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Washington, said easement being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; Thence North 88 degreesl9'50" West along the south line thereof, a distance of 312.31 feet; Thence continuing along said south line North 88 degreesl9'50" West a distance of 70.00 feet; Thence departing said south line North 01 degrees 40'10" East a distance of 80.00 feet; Thence South 88 degrees 19'50" East a distance of 70.00 feet; lilt//I liii!1111111/1 I//I1111111111p5ag3e 2436 IIIIIIII 2 of 2 Jefferson County pud JUDI WITTMfiYER 03/25/ 02.46P 43 CO EgSE 43.p Thence South 01 degrees 4010" West a distance of 70.00 feet; Thence South 88 degrees 19'50" East a distance 317.70 feet to the east line of said Lot 1;Thence South 30 degrees 00'00" West a distance of 11.36 to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH an easement for the placement, maintenance, construction, reconstruction, repair and upkeep of a sewer line over under and across the South twenty feet of Lot 1 from its boundary with Lot 2 to the tanks and drainfields Said easements are appurtenant to and for the benefit of the named parties, the present owners, their heirs, future owners, successors, and assigns of Lot 2, Nason Short Plat. SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE CANCELED ONLY AT SUCH TIME AS THE JEFFERSON COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WILL APPROVE CANCELLATION OF SAME. /t-tiN WITNESS THEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hand and seal this 11- day of March, 2008. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: RED P. NASON FR D P. NASON ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) On this day personally appeared before me FRED P. NASON, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. /} �LC� GIVEN under my hand and official seal this / / ay� a of !/ . , 2008. `0"IItirt4r rir P.4 C.)� %';�` = NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of NOTARY rcl = Washington. Residing at. PUBLIC w tr.-)A 2 6 My commission expires: OF WAS\*N∎��� p r rrrrftlllll��� .! .., p �ieri?4ir, ;? k;ufi (`„ Av. ny.r JEFFERSON COUNTY �w�SON °� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1-2 veq �C 621 Sheridan Street ��qs, 0$ Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scaif, Director March 4, 2008 �hrp�, Dear Revi r, RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Comments must be received within fourteen(14)calendar days or by March 18, 2008. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact Z LAMP at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Ann Lamp / C: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:57 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737 Nason Comments Zoe: I have reviewed the Revised Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers, received February 20, 2008. I have the following comments: • I am finding that the figures included in biological reports do not always match the plan sheets submitted for the project. The mitigation plan says that the wetland buffer will be reduced to 69 feet. I suggest that you confirm that the plan sheets show the same buffer reduction. • I recommend the following two comments be added as conditions of approval: o The project biologist must flag or stake the 69-foot reduced wetland buffer and a silt fence shall be installed along the outer edge of the buffer. Prior to beginning any ground-disturbing activities, Jefferson County Department of Community Development shall be contacted to review the location and installation of the silt fence. Contact Zoe Ann Lamp[or Donna, I'm okay with either]after the silt fence has been installed at 360-379-4450 to schedule the verification. o Bird boxes installed in the reduced wetland buffer shall be constructed as specified in Appendix F of the revised report received February 20, 2008. Installation of any bird boxes that deviate from those specifications and have the potential to be used by non-native birds are prohibited in the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any questions, Donna. 3/13/2008 ti�(44,G, 49 0? 'tiN°� JEFFERSON COUNTY i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director y MEMORANDUM 1 To: Fred and Judy Nason Rosemary and Charles Law Nancy Woffenden Tanya Royer Donna Frostholm Linda Atkins Terry Duff From: Zoe Ann Lamp—Associate Planner Date: October 22, 2007 Subject: Meeting to Discuss the SPAAD Proposed at 181 Portage Way, Port Hadlock The meeting to discuss the SPAAD will be held on October 29, 2007 at 10 a.m. Since we are having such a large group the meeting location will be in the Public Works Conference Room located at 623 Sheridan St., Port Townsend. The building is across the parking lot to the east of the Department of Community Development. Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360)379-4450 e-mail: ascalf @co.jefferson.wa.us FAX: (360) 379-4451 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:40 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: Nason SPAAD - MLA05-00737 Zoe, Actually I was waiting for a reply on a code interpretation from the state and I just got it today. The site that Ryan Tillman shows for the septic area is not consistent with the code so I will be sending him a letter to that effect in the next day or two. I'll let you know what I hear. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and hea(tnierJefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at /CM 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN 42..56. From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:06 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Nason SPAAD - MLA05-00737 Linda, On August 31 I routed a revised site plan and septic information to you for the Nason SPAAD on Portage Way (next to Lower Oak Bay Park). Have you had a chance to review this? Please advise. I'll be speaking with them in the next couple of days. Thank you! Zoe Ann 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:06 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Nason SPAAD - MLA05-00737 Linda, On August 31 I routed a revised site plan and septic information to you for the Nason SPAAD on Portage Way (next to Lower Oak Bay Park). Have you had a chance to review this? Please advise. I'll be speaking with them in the next couple of days. Thank you! Zoe Ann 10/18/2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P.O.Box 2070 623 Sheridan Street Rz Port Townsend,WA 08368 Mk_ o' .l (36D)385-9160 Frank Gifford,Public Works Director Monte Reinders,P.E.,County Engineer r .': 7 ~i��.._... --� i ! I i 3 OCT 1 6 2007 11,2)I MEMORANDUM JEFFERSON Col INTY DEPT. OF CO`,i:4u,,fir otvt:!_O ',.•;Ni TO: Zoe Ann Lamp, Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development FROM: Terry Duff, Engineering Tech Ill DATE: October 9, 2007 •.�QJ� SUBJECT: Road Setback Reduction Request—Portage Way./Nason APN 962700108 Public Works has found no advantage to any roadway to reduce the setback from the right of way. The following information is being provided in response to your request for comments regarding the above request: • Portage Way is a rural local access road with a 20' driving surface with 1' gravel shoulders and a posted speed limit of 25 mph that serves a few residences and Lower Oak Bay Park. • The average annual daily traffic(AADT) is 50 trips per day. As with any other road, the count varies during the year. Due to Lower Oak Bay Park use, the count has been up to 344 trips a day during a summer weekend. • Portage Way has a 60' right of way within the plat of Irondale Acre Tracts and Hiller Waterfront Tracts to the south of the parcel and a 30' right of way within Irondale Acre Tracts on the east boundary of the parcel. • Portage Way is subject to damage due to winter high tides and wind. Emergency repairs in 1994, 1999 and 2006 due to storm damage included replacing the roadway base and surfacing and repairing the rip rap on the Oak Bay side of the road. The road location is constrained by Oak Bay to the southeast and should it need to be reconstructed, it would be inland toward the above referenced parcel. • Due to the horizontal alignment of the road at the southeast corner of the parcel, sight distance within the"sight triangle" needs to be maintained in order to provide safe stopping sight distance for motorists. No obstruction to sight distance should be allowed. The proposed location of the building envelope in the southeast portion of the parcel appears to propose an obstruction. • The address of 181 Portage Way was assigned at the original driveway location at mile post .18 left, approximately 80 feet north of the latest proposed location. This location provided adequate site distance and a change in location would require the address to be changed. Recycled Paper 1 • The site distance for the approach location as shown on the site plan received October 1, 2007 is not adequate because of the proximity to the curve (intersection)and the proposed building envelope. • The driveway should be constructed in a way that vehicles pulling out of the approach do not back out on to the roadway. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. 162001 OCT �----F-p vi�riv__; JE FE DE?T.CF GO:.ifvtU v{CY' DE\∎Lt- EN( Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 11:34 AM To: 'Reich, Rosemary' Subject: RE: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan First, CONGRATULATIONS on your up coming marriage. We get so involved in your project when we talk on the phone that I haven't wished you well. This is a very exciting time for you. In addition to your project with me you probably have all sorts of wedding preparations going on. Be sure to relax and enjoy this very special time. I spoke with Donna. She gave two alternatives to save money. 1) If your current biologist agrees, he could be on site when the plants are delivered to make sure they're healthy. He could then set them out where they are to be planted. He would check them and when he does his "as built" drawing. or 2) You can hire a another wetland biologist to be on site to supervise the planting. Hope this helps. I'll contact everyone next week after I meet with Public Works. Zoe Ann From: Reich, Rosemary [mailto:rosemary.reich @boeing.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:52 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Thanks Zoe, I just got this today. Not good news if we have to hire Joe Callahan to supervise the planting. He charged the sellers $4,000.00 for the report that he did for them - 1000.00 just for the site visit - Uff-da. Charlie and I are getting married on the 13th of this month, would be nice if the county would approve the SPAAD soon there after as a wedding present :0). rr Rosemary Reich 025%.e Aa'auirzs0,4tor for Sean StairaX, Sez.thr L11a17-39e2; 767Cadin Syscoms 4t11:4' Recoyn7t7on Focal rosemary.reichaboeinq .com (425) 342-8454 40-88.1, 1C4-1, 03-CM 10/4/2007 Page 2 of 2 From: Zoe Ann Lamp [mailto:zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 11:11 AM To: Reich, Rosemary Subject: FW: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan As we discussed on Friday, here are Donna's comments. I will be sending an official request letter tomorrow (Monday). Zoe Ann From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:13 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Zoe: I have reviewed the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers (dated May 21, 2007)for Parcel 962700108. This report was submitted to the County on August 10, 2007 by the applicant, Fred Nason, who is requesting a SPAAD for a single-family house. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The plants proposed for installation are appropriate for the area as are the plant spacing, size, and quantities shown in Table 1 of the report. Planting specifications should be included in Appendix C. The report should identify if any soil amendments or mulch will be needed. Given the number of plants to be installed, the project biologist should be on-site just prior to plant installation to ensure the plants will be placed in the ground as per the plan and that the plants to be installed are healthy. 2. An as-built must be submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation. The as-built is used as a baseline for determining if the performance standards are met. 3. All monitoring should be conducted by the project biologist, and monitoring reports should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. 4. The conclusion section (page 11) makes reference to installing bird boxes. The location of the bird boxes should be shown on the plans. Any bird boxes proposed as part of the mitigation plan should be based on requirements for native birds (that have the potential to occur in the area) and bird box specifications should be included in the report. Bird box specifications are intended to decrease the likelihood that non- native species, such as starlings, will use the boxes. 5. Also in the conclusion section, the last bullet makes reference to cultivated species. All species planted in the reduced buffer must be native species. Non-native and/or landscaping varieties are not appropriate substitutions for planting within the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any question, Donna. 10/4/2007 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:59 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: thornburg Zoe, I took a quick look at the final plat map you gave me and noticed that he did not put the soil logs on lots 2 and 3 where the systems are proposed, the ones in the well radius aren't applicable anyway. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working fora safer anc healthier Jefferson County CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN 42.56. 1 0/2/2007 Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Reich, Rosemary [rosemary.reich @boeing.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:52 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Thanks Zoe, I just got this today. Not good news if we have to hire Joe Callahan to supervise the planting. He charged the sellers $4,000.00 for the report that he did for them - 1000.00 just for the site visit - Uff-da. Charlie and I are getting married on the 13th of this month, would be nice if the county would approve the SPAAD soon there after as a wedding present :0). rr Rosemary Reich Ofica flanth s'razor for Saan R Sullivan, Sanior lllanagar, 787 Cabin Sy,-v(6/23s' 42114; Racgyxkloan Focal rosemary.reich @boeing .com (425) 342-8454 40-88.1, 1C4-1, 03-CM From: Zoe Ann Lamp [mailto:zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 11:11 AM To: Reich, Rosemary Subject: FW: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan As we discussed on Friday, here are Donna's comments. I will be sending an official request letter tomorrow (Monday). Zoe Ann From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:13 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Zoe: I have reviewed the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers (dated May 21, 2007) for Parcel 962700108. This report was submitted to the County on August 10, 2007 by the applicant, Fred Nason, who is requesting a SPAAD for a single-family house. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The plants proposed for installation are appropriate for the area as are the plant spacing, size, and quantities shown in Table 1 of the report. Planting specifications should be included in Appendix C. The report should identify if any soil amendments or mulch will be needed. Given the number of plants to be installed, the project biologist should be on-site just prior to plant installation to ensure the plants will be placed in the ground as per the plan and that the plants to be installed are healthy. 10/3/2007 Page 2 of 2 2. An as-built must be submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation. The as built is used as a baseline for determining if the performance standards are met. 3. All monitoring should be conducted by the project biologist, and monitoring reports should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. 4. The conclusion section (page 11) makes reference to installing bird boxes. The location of the bird boxes should be shown on the plans. Any bird boxes proposed as part of the mitigation plan should be based on requirements for native birds (that have the potential to occur in the area) and bird box specifications should be included in the report. Bird box specifications are intended to decrease the likelihood that non- native species, such as starlings, will use the boxes. 5. Also in the conclusion section, the last bullet makes reference to cultivated species. All species planted in the reduced buffer must be native species. Non-native and/or landscaping varieties are not appropriate substitutions for planting within the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any question, Donna. 10/3/2007 C D D CO �/ / X ` -D v m = o o g n C X X C / O O z O O � 3 �mI D m o — Zfn :U Vl �p OZ2 Z r m n Z �r QH m m c � pgm g2o c oo o -.- X * * �0 ZO O ° OEC 00 z m o '� -I m 2 � � ° o 1:13° mom � � � A 0 : C 2 C D � p rmm mm mm C O O m z v c'= H-+ � -I-I O = � D KZm Z .xiX -< O - z m Z o Z m 0 0 o �I D W ooxr �� MO o� v-. 0• `� Z m t `z0� Coco m zzo A0° D Cs O .Z�1 ° m ■o mDmN no.19ER >� Tp —1 D D D N U) o ,mm0 wrn• �m O' O 0o Z f S Z _� m � m v (II CNlI oa,z 4.4. g z r 0 L9 n p W ZO<O 4,-4030 OO . * 2� 7 X n OZ N= z D D --In c ° D{ o-m w 1 y rm w n� 1v � .0 n z_mo O � m I- cn O7 07 + + + + ��N� op co O m U1 C CO Ul O O � DOOZ m ca W =0071 opD O(nY) Z 0 m -0 mfg ZCm �` � c � 0 I*O4, ■04.s. , ______________ ss1,4 . o _. „ ,� 3 ° 3 , —I mO ., ,�, 0 0 3 °z 0 O m m g T) z0 \ \49P1O 0 0 D ° o �` FgST i *o co 00 m , 141‘ x ,c)i 7/ ' .4*tr.*‘4 r- 0 ' \i ISA kl\ * Z ///// 4,-1 CO 7 O ifillW 1#1piti' / // .. ■c le ogairro, 4f,1 l■ " ■ IPItill 4Pr/trilli41$41111:4111*7■;11L--r;'' . mz1) �� Ocn0 I Nz = ` 0 ° o z \ ,` SOOT 1) 70 ° mm zc � 2 y `330° °o 0z < F0 06 00, , m o r °— o cn xix �9' 0 ,, n O x Ozcn o 0 /A, = • m / n m " 0 cn m D n p D Do �� YY�ST m < m r C� O m D O \ m 71 O Z a m II C `` o o F - R 1' Z 0 0I- 0 Nrq c D F r %/co 4 . 4 "' KT: r I r 4 . 4 11, 4 I r.ii r _ . .. . . p ■ No.' l' ' 1--- .4,7:-„,„, 9 1; - < i . . . •,, ..:::.- . :,0 , . • , ' 1 il,c,-, --• . , •, ._ \ ....:.,;--,. . , lilt' :' 1 .., ..i• , . 10.4 IIVP. . 4 , • ,; --. • • - ..* • - 1• , I . ' • - 1: 41.' . i .,; • . 1%• ''''t•,i ', ....4.0..1.,- F. .---."....4."..:`..4.?; :,:'":.•A•:A 1,,,,l t...'.,-"'...'-.i7.":4.■.",7,..,.:•„.•.'-■,■.„- . 4 , -,--,”, ,.,.-.•••.- • • a-... .....'uk• N • , • ,-:,:•,-i.• I i Cm .--....., • ..., o. -...3 . ••• i -,0"-- •? .),e- 1 ., • ,-. '.' _c/1 , 71' • 11 R k•;# ,• i ,.. '.. r'...• j, A. ,•,,-., v,,.. ...- 1 , . 7 ,,, •:•:, o.if 0,/, ,-t L.,,. . ‘ i J- • i ,,,,,,,t,,k. , .. . ...• r . - . — ; t 2;i,.', ;;01,`,-;p•;;`,4' .0... 'Tr '• 1 , 6 4 '....II; .41 4,.. 7 4, ' Ir. I,• . , ' \t . . . , -,•t: '' .. , ..'.: , . . . I ‘ 1 ' A • •• J • . . ••• • .4• 41 .,.., .• . . ... ..,.. ... . • "''''''''-,- ••• ,, - . - ,-„ • i i f- r , . ..... fr. , , '.•74e-tj''. •,611 , f: : 1 f --... . '-'"Ii■! . • -..0 fiT.:, • ,. '.•••' ..,... - I k ■ r .4 A, .1 i ,ii im , . 4 4 • ' t, .. '-..IV hi , - al. 4 • - tl • •, . - I Li--t _ _ . ‘1. . # .a , t —6... .• •• . . _ .. . • •• • "Pf 4,4 _. 4. t 4 , ...,4.4. 3r 4 ,i) — • . 1 ' 1 /t- i 1.. . t i • , , •• 2 ...• ; 4 — . . . . . t . . 1 • 1.4,i , , . ,I r.,., 41 . ... L ii . of. .. 4 ' t . # 4 # . I i . ' , • 1 ' 33 3 At J' 4 i •• ,,. sit II 1 , I - .1 , 11 s 9' ' . - i k4 4r r ;a i ilir-F.:: I ' it .i.. t i . t" 0.* 0 ' k.,* *14 i ''' . 1 i 1* 01 S I P .`F . • h .) r` i t* / k , y ;T , t- 1 b 1 'i... I l' t 4 Y f t • y ! 9 *v w f • 4 • t 0 . tr d i . , r i ' ,.:: • a it • , . i , J., 4f, . >l d SON` , 9sifiNG`° JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director MEMORANDUM To: Fred and Judy Nason Rosemary and Charles Law Nancy Woffenden Tanya Royer From: Zoe Ann Lamp—Associate Planner Date: October 30, 2007 Subject: Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)for Portage Way Area Thank you for taking the time to meet with us yesterday. Attached is a copy of the FEMA FIRM for the Portage Way area. I told Fred and Judy at the meeting I would send them a copy of this map. One of the conditions of approval for the SPAAD will be a requirement to comply with the current Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. One of the requirements of the ordinance is submittal of flood elevation certificates. Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 e-mail: ascalf @co.jefferson.wa.us FAX: (360) 379-4451 -___.. N , qtr Z C—NN.__—_--_ _..__—_-______ --A> F> rom m m- mZ '{ r m f£ c N J rn m Iii O - i2 1\\ d4 �\ '7 Ur , - r, .rryo Al II FT �A I ,1_ II .—_-I� II c s 17 : Si,4%44' 1 5 t y'''�'y' o- '4 * '4 y 44 o- 1;''n y u„y„`a�4 w^�x1r ;.i»''y. `"...:10„„xyw,x a �F' C `(*Y F;Sryt 1z3''e4' u [5y+,..}s'f ' t}+ 4,*,(It i §vt?e?” 2 F 0 a a 3 g N%m ynlrn = r 3 0 de: " ® T O m o z kp0,ymgi3 Ls7 T C = I m m Z Z "*7 s rn 0 _ o x rr, m R g m° 'xv Z ti 3 x co o I Q1H ` a ---1/° _ T cn DN m Z C] = H y■ ygea _, A G T wpA mlil b 0 T n n a a-' •' n o = r Y G+ > > cm s mm �' 7D a r- m..a o r o [� Z S m m »i3c . m = Z 1 �? �"3 —I - N C • rn y., T i AP»'n N !'^ wa o -0 a -p mpom 2 \ ;/ m m Iv ,, = o , �v KEY TO MAP 500-Year Flood Boundary 100-Year Flood Boundary Zone Designations* L_ 100-Year Flood Boundary ONE C -- — 500-Year Flood Boundary 2 w S8 Base Flood Elevation Line 513 With Elevation In Feet** Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone** Elevation Reference Mark RM7X Zone D Boundary River Mile •M1.5 **Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 *EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS ZONE EXPLANATION A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. AO Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three(3)feet;average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. AH Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. A1-A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. _3.3 A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood _ elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. B Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500- year flood;or certain areas subject to 100-year flood- = ing with average depths less than one(1)foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile;or areas protected by levees from the base flood. (Medium shading) LAND , C Areas of minimal flooding.(No shading) D Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. V Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave Q action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors 0 ==== not determined. V1-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. J NOTES TO USER QCertain areas not In the special flood hazard areas(zones A and V) may be protected by flood control structures. This map is for flood insurance purposes only; it does not neces- sarily show all areas subject to flooding in the community or all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas. For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map —— Panels. INITIAL IDENTIFICATION: JUNE 21,1977 FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP REVISIONS: 5 4 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EFFECTIVE: JULY 19, 1982 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP REVISIONS: N OI O J W Z = Q 6 Y1 Z O Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 1:17 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Nason - SEP06-00180 - HPA Requirement Linda, Ryan Tillman contacted me asking about the HPA requirement in your October 29th letter. I left him a voice message telling him that we had discussed this at the meeting on Monday. We (meaning Donna and I though I doubt I made that clear in the voice message) had determined that the stream did not flow as indicated in our mapping and we couldn't find a culvert so an HPA wouldn't be required. Sincerely, Zoe Ann Lamp Associate Planner, DRD Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-9406 Fax: 360-379-4473 e-mail: zlampco.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 11/1/2007 S2 C, — s6 i 1 1 v , easay & l?) ,c Env Re{ - + W ) I' i i . `33.73 S.P. Ya- 2 -- a - � In 1; nil 1 II1 t 1 NASON SHORT PLAT SP II-90 A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 Twp. 29, Rge. IE , W. M. Jefferson Co., Wash. SP"�E 9,...1 I ""f•NT t•1 ,., (Being a Replat of Tracts 87 88. Irondale r N 1(.t:- I s of " x'94/1‘_ " ,«T.. 147 '45 ." ,'kI Acre Tracts per Vol.2 of Plats, Page 145 o°"�`,. . z. Fa:�UF tiT 4F[FA, N� rRR%c.Iw{; '. 1•nX+.aS r �{ LL T:ACT �M o•�" Jefferson Co. Wash. N0 . ---weLic it VICINITY Iy0 YF�V/t .OAF MAP %P. at - .( DAy NO gCA(E) I p6 Lt0 •• ,.• te'P QA3/3 Oi ¢E11R/Al6 I WASH/N6TON COORDINATE JYSTEM NORTH 2ONC /3`'R r TR/ AREA CRP �T AER/AL MAPP/NG Of /980- AL•50 I •. ..• A3 DETERMINED BY /"/EAJURERIENT8 BETWECN TNN I —� WEST QUARTER [0471/CR,y,NDP THE 9 N,BRA/ M/ 3E OR I-- T° , NER Of ,SECT/ON 7, TCY✓ PoRT A5 DEPcTL-7 NERCON. cP0o0^' PLp p R/W ,u J�'ta'o so A4AAeto �"T 1 ccEVELANO ST 1 o.td r //lrofANP-°R ZINC 6L .3D -.\ /r K x Icy. t t 5 85" /7.-17-E _ _ _ � fj S,.or 117 L //.} Ii!- —��gip,L/NE, TRAC7 G7�- 8y'� ® t : /� C U/1y'1'h� t t �t�1 E/.�% .��V M16H , u I1� EASEMENT LOT 1 Q \ 5 PAC-E V/ L 0T 2 �a FOR i t tASt !`1FIVT t p� v Di t i a� aa S�T� 3./� Ac 3 31 10REA AL © B �t Lerz 3` \ �*O 110 /0' � t / y qo• /9 w•�\%I �L ER3lAfNY _.. .00__ _ __ f0 I' t'MN/7L -e-----.--II'/f ' 800.00 - / 't- y GA'tD K.to __ r on _' _ A Y 4•` t0O OD tam v nwrwlvT PORTAGE /9• gp- W N G8' `�_"A 694.e4 _ro. 4-1i-CONC. • �/0 "l CORP O) 4E6E410 NOTE r •, MONUMENTAT/D// 3[NEME (NO 5CflLE) •• ter R£Bnrt /[.s Por.+z /o L»? rag 57-0/?1-1 DRAINAGE REOUIREMENT.5. O"f N9. 15.2144 Retro f co.,' 3 1: yl,�f?. F/ELO p AJOREMCNTJ MAO( WTTN — —� • I`3?V' i:3' I. TOTAL 3Ti1TON INFRARED Cam C •;I (0MI�tPPM) WING FIELD TRAVER3e Z AND R 0.W. 3URVEY !r,{ETII003. 311,N✓.SEC.7 a •iiu r" V I .ao CLOSURE MEETJ OR EXC£CD3 A CIRTACY 3TQ AMRD A3 PER W.AC. sins -- y t3 pKN u_IjO-O�O py7A0RAPN3 !W{LA7. . V I 1t+,AKl 3 ���� /3 { TWP 29 N. RGE I(.- ' Sumo A IootAse ).reY �4e .=-' 7�, AMTS' 9 t 8p•Ur•Op-w d�N - loose .316E 3ME2T 'f*PE # J t Norics o Ko ieo E i Un:PLATTED r• PorENnAC PORCRASBRS. ___ /-• v 1 auditor's i T T auditors certificng 1 "e yors PLAT I� M�CD lIW1 S .te /t ,19"tL, dl I)1LRtlY 6p1T1/T TIYT TIM T/MCC1 M[ E* 1.0* • . r �, �,0 __ for recordIP WOK- .Z- O1 Oa*,a-- a the V RV[T, 'T'INT WE CONIKS 'i "ti tiA m. ih WOK-2)...-01 Nan,d Do9e1 Tian_ THAT to Rtvuweo STAKES I r� Z' owa..11e�•MOO�a...+"r` of /�tcco oR nIC eRO1ru ...ma.... Me 0.4" req+est �.�1 "•••111‘...."J T ® �/.::. -� `y2�>ti1� 1�162'7� /^1190 rr l ' . deter KP4.9O .JO(}efiGfl C.• A11�lor b m. DVV/Q3 o 3. 2■2-- If,,,.. ... ;'J'If.:ltkl I s-RrDL2 ►l181 . [ , , , , ,ir,) DEC 2 1 2005 E i. 6 IF • NASO1�l o �r 'L AT S - 11 - 90 £10 A PEFLA1 a A ��IMM 01 MC 176 i TS,P A' �� YIASISala1 All plat r.cced•d n Atl Urt pewee d Tree M and that portion d hid h yng eo.d.ey a w following t11o.e portent d pact 17 and tract•e Of nodal.Au.haw,per p d.sab.d Id•As,It We pW of Yodel*Ado Tract*per the plat deed r.ra[Nd at Volt 2 of Mau.at Pogo NE,R.cord.of J.R.wn Covey WWMg�t A portion page N1,n Votes 2 of Prep.IMCOrd.of Jaff..on Carey,tYaal•.gim d Goverment Lot 2.n 6.ctlon 1.TorWAp 2.North•I.9• E..4 wllawatu Marione. decreed at foltod Lae A.Inegweing at a pent on 11 Sisatrely Ibat.of Mid hart Pl. del A point sr WI ran Northerly of the 5nadeet l Corer of MEd Tract St these."deg tp'TI'E.. at the Modest Co r of Saki b.ctwn 1 thence Ad'•71.'-4G'W.•beg •detrc.of.Cell/..t to th.Go w..+•rl.Mdr Leo a d la wow d Nd LM•A'. �Led of Mid E.ced.L•dunce of 2.44.42 foot to ur 11.464 114 Co,e eau In Jefferson County,ab.a.ngon. of said&acto t Vea N.CY 24,'-41PE.along said Weedy Leh ,•dieted of 1000 fwt,Maw&d'Alle•E.a/dad of 0000 fart to the 5a eded Corner of Dad Traci K anal THE PONT ce done• fr tees.N.O1*-70'•4b'E. along en Comely Margin of Ceded fared and eatdy Lod of Tract 00 and.1, •dl.ta..c.2(A01 fog.thee.0.45-ff'-31,L•dada of 02610 foot to V.. added Goven+A rlea.dr Let Mend I.04-34 y'L along Mw dude Let tai •d'-•"'.of X04 fed.Uwe.N 16••26'•2]'E slang said meander lbws•dotard of 0210 fad theca N lY-A•-7Y L deg sad rese r Line•theca of QN law AP*aide iron the roof or roof.of w. node".ea otnectuw rd driveways,P 1118 dad•.o-rT-3T L•dada at 214 1.51 to she Ilse ry Marge of Portage Noy, roe..o odor.rllr hod added deo 0145 be deed beoug.•Add awa$..1 anon as said My r.er I.dededeal It saw put of wined de treed Mac.It 70--00 sae pw�y re odr the 10 foot from PS* The dada.ORA Seat ft and M•Itatbn pia OW YL abg saw tuwry Margin of eel Plug.Say•di.tarr..of 2 J'5 f.«to w re Lo be 6at..•..4 a.b•ltbed and approved by the Jellied Candy^b"c Pod D.P.n6ee 6oe1.M Cosner of said Tract w.,feet.N.w-lea-6a III,deeg U.Northerly Marge at the tar of appedlen for A hNl�.f� for OnnvAroMMen• a r•.wre.or any ode of said Pruge twy,a.d todrowy Leta d said Tree SC,•dietan.of*MOO foe away woo do IPA Compliance sal�"" d beard deed ocedency poet to the Twfr PONT Cr t7ea.HlNfa for 515 such molds ,rk:Mom o a wined l.j Id Mello Idle Compared the sae aye.=he bed•.called n.reendoe.40 de.sOSRbd ad•ppowd platy Odd In Amino.Cody,aladagta.t Leeren.4 ti tee L-y d.JANJf._—,/l2.(. der b fee \- , !1P -` L..-`(',1: l; Kra w a Pere try doe of the lad that L n d...der•a arid dente Gbrrf a the Dowd NM th r the peeved tot the d V..l..d Jea n NM aloe prat ad ill.deemed daplcud heed to M deed by ay 6.e win ad cleat Toe OJIPD A CErl.iG1E n-- I.le Ma•dlaw Tl...u.r of Jefferson Corey IbJ+.gtat hooky cart"clot n•a.r.r bract i r'ar•svy..t ay de Uhl. day of fa all real property tad dos and depo.lta reseed to rove anticipated • tee on rho property!'; •a•'a In the awe n.. ha.,w boa paw.q to '. ��°"Q "Ifltrv." a.d Ycl.d.g the year rL'ra •n.M .wt Jm.7 wsay3r.»N= Maladararatitil Seto of abw.gtan ) .. Candy or Jefree 1 g ®LQ TMr se�4 i�c"/U,Ss. °appeared a!r His.VsM...r�..w.d Feared and approved we sr day of ..t2-e'r/ n,'/ ere Edo d.deeda ad•adder*of r trot le Ovid and a.al.d " r- y. ow...A r la.v ereansey AN ad deed for doe ter purpose Vr•••• ` it-.1. 'r1LiJ/•∎••• - alrY Natal the to le auhM•d to rww add Indeed pye,atg And D.awng DaPa't"•d /..ccw sal the day ad year Ore.0000 send .• �, p� ��.KI .. ad•pp oval VM day of jIjda_ _,A Zl ananitesa /5 e ern;•• 1W'{d. a>.y�r •� Or.etar Jrfrsae Ca•a't9 'It.4 Ileohegon reeding My dodelen wend ..5 NOTICE TO P0T10aTiAL PVeCNAIEIM. __ Evened r approved dry d L.i 2 L soot PMOD OP Pf--AJLYIAla6 UUTCUT M MUMS OP A P5UL LP16 ,ate �.•15M� PLAT. Jeerer.Cody Note Pod Departed Doran.* 2.A SENAAN DISPOSAL now 11A6 OE 4 ISSUED POle LOT 2*DM RPM IS►!EA YTS*M room PLOT OE NSTMlm CAWETefT YiN TIE Plgdleces or T11Y P6E7t.M PTRYT IS VALC PPS 0!YEA*PROM �� AiovtpfaaER h 1510. A YEARLY ISM.IS PLR1T1=FOR A MA)R111 CP TWO h)YEARS. trot E3YR4TION OP M SdADE DISPOSAL PNrOSES IS NOT OuARAMESD YD IS%DA=10 AM ER p for at the need of DAVID Cva.s I A600CIATT/$P . . APPwOVAL CO A KEYED 051110E DISPOSAL APPteCATloi(CONTACT J-Owl of Vote of SNOW!PLAt6. ..//ew R.eord•of Te.•+tepid corer 1EALTN DEPArtrofT) ago. ��aa • Jefrrwn Cady,delbgtaw e 3 M4I' e10VAL a,OR MAJOR DtSTUNDANCE CP SOIL Vole TM PfaO►D6ED - DNAM7LD A1�A$MAY Qt ATE WTI COPCm O*1NDT MI WACCBRAOLE rid ' POI!M PnTALLATI0t O OEYLAGS DISPOSAL 67614516 AID COULD Cry NvALDATS M MAO*DISPOSAL Melt Ando- / ( /r1")"' POTABLE WIEN SUPPLY*PleCVDED DT INIS SNORT PLAT.CITY 150PA1 4 Q poet looney WATER IS*MILAN.*ADJACENT TO T146 SILL i� O. ACCESS ONTO floArnecte 1.NY /°m ArAWOT 4 viii CA �•ar'a SET 2 OF 2 t'. Jelled Cody ;, • p . ,3393?2 .. !Scum•.,r�i P. t - 2 • S. . ._._. Y._ . -1 1 n C 1;3 II t r ; — tl 7-7:7)•. I v . 1 ` i' ll_i'L ? '1 9 fie r. f NASON SHORT PLAT SP 1I- . x A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 SPACE ���ENT T,:, Twp. 29, Rge. IE , W. M. Jefferson Co., Wash.•C►i I et-. K +Olt =. 1: RE.c.tregr, �- A (Being a Replat of Tracts 87 88, Irondale F1ATt.ELAL MESA. NEI MIAMI TUF ervI �r r- C.pys: ItA• aaAFAIT AFLCA, NO Merit.ew ;, Acre Tracts per Vol. 2 of Plats, Page 14 5 f ' •40' `- ', Fit Li/+i''1, ALTKIzAknOrt,el[ekt•nr,.,ps P 9 — vQ't ou(;_,.. z L 4514+.LE. TAKE r e-.r. Jefferson Co. Wash. . =� T %. TO.d10ENO :':c .6E • Y/C/N/TY I D�0 %%7A !o MAP(NO SCA E I tP GR6 ° .. OAr QIl"NJ Of $CAAAV6 P 1 O N/AJH/NGTON COOR0/NATE JVSTEM NORTH 2ON£ PER TR/ AR£A CRP 477 AER/AL MAPP/N6 OF /980. ALSO I r A3 L1ET£RMYNCD BY PL''A3URCM£Nr3 BET4/E£N THE I —j 14/537 OUARTCR CORNER AND THE AR)RTHWCJT • CDR- NCR OF . CCTA9N 7, TLW/N3H/P 29N, RAN6E /E, aPI A3 DFPK'TE'D NE/fCON. PORT CUOCON p 477 D R/W CLLYELAND 3T / 1 M7f'LO tY! g41C,rAClO GOVT •1 o I0 /Mli9NDER C/N! •5 80' /T D?-E _ ua.tt 1 5 88' /7'37-E 45t.00 «x .• _ % s9 t y.OO Ai lit —�..__ L/N!, TRACT 87�� 4 /�,YVj'F// J�.orl _ �// �t(1° •.e' ® 8 h p 4 1 /y G 7.)044 3 7 I 4•I�i 7 0 N.i W I %� EASEMENT \\,,:41. �, • R LOT 1 -9pAC.E • LOT 2 a 3,/4 .AC 0 WI'M FO \a 0.03 Ac of aI 3 as AL cAS4-P.1ENT s N • 3 AREA _- t,. XS. •" enet _i LD I tar L P t � r 1 `\orutr f0 t'•t'.0.4i/YE \ 1 U T �T /0.E7'N I \`��l y-� .4'M'n•ao'!±_ ---- 3 - "- _ ./ Nom' /9' 30'W 1554'� . c.Wt'D Me"'iv—�" -- too.00• F/ Oa! 0 nntrrsra.T •�_ (aIAY F 1--1 PORT/00C 100.00 0._ 594. to NOG' /9' 70 W f0. r.+-CONC. • MON +••/Co.AEP ' .8.W a-90) K ;/ MONUMENTAT/ON LEGEND NOTE SCHEME (,%V 5CPLE) •• SET REBA? "/L.S. PO4-12 /O CAP SEE SHEET 2 Or 2 FQR STQRM DRAINAGE R£OU/RCMENT3. • 0•flm LS.2Kaa5 RCLW[f 4AP. 3 I Ik — y ��?'P F/ELO P71EA7UR£MCNT.7 MAD£ W/TN •1, V C�✓ r 707AL 57-ATJoN INFRA/MO EOM 2 (Awn,,rmitm) (/3/NG F/CLD TRM✓£RiC It • % AN0 RADIAL 3URY£Y fAETH00J. . irj 301,NW.SEC.7 ti t - 4 ., CLOTURE MOCCTJ OR E7CC503 I ` U / 88 % ACCURACY STA'CARO AJ PER h/.AG l 7 i 2 , 3JZ-430-O9O,PAWAGRAPHS /41f2(.). -r.• 7 t '4!!t° l 3+10 i ftGNTAdV' AMY -' /J4'. • _ - .,. ANTS j TWP. P9N, RUE./E,AU,/ JIM 3NEdr ?air x 'Prose NOS'' i y UnPLATTED rr I ' . OM ; SCALE /-•AO' §)(P�(/�} auditors certificate +`fi" surveyors a 'P~S. C44 1�.�K`J`I►Y�JOVI iI1W for record ads I day of APt/t ,IQ • CI 1 WIMPY uISTWY TAT Tws swowT PLAT K wCD UPON NA m. in book_ of b of /Ly 1)q • KWb∎. .∎•∎• Upa Pb Da9• SIMV[Y. TAT TN[ CprIK� MC psTANC[S M! flgtNl �' r —.: MUM?of. Car T NASIN T EIIEON, AND TAT ALL RCOUdtfD STAKES AND • ` I I � ~ - _ ., Y PLACED ON TN( IMMO. ��j• Pf�r Sheet/ d _ �f r.l '• -• K2/Z7/ 090 £ ' `V1.-'- 1t date. K•E6-90 Jefferson County Audttor N.,.. YY/4.5 0 i 3.3 4 1 3 2 'TI IAA.`.: :'1'If.TfliI. I s_P roe 2 11 IB I • 1, 0 L 4,47 ,t„,„ . . , . S eY DEC 2 1 2005 . NASo�l o�-r L AT 5� 11 - go • A PORTION CrOvEparfENT LOT 2,ITECTICW 1,TDWtIR 2t NORTI4,RA11M I!ALT,WILLAMETTE PIE IDIAIL AMMON COWTY,W*b* TON f DEII6 ALSO A 11EPL.At Q A PORTION OP RUM ern MD Nt IROIOKL ACM TRAOT0.PIM WWII 2 OP PLATE,PAGE NE,RECORDS a JE2RRECN COMET 14V,31.- x}81 All Pet premier of Tract N ad that portion of Tract al dewy Swirly of the follow. Thos.parts..or Tract ill and tract ae of Itord I.Acre Traet.,per plat racord.d In d*rbai IIr'A',In w pia of Yo dIle Aso Tracts per the pi at thr.W recorded at vot.2 of Mats.at Pag.N6,Record.of Aaronson Cwt •1r�gt EM✓�• rtlon page NE,In Vdr.2 d PMMa,Records of Jefferson Carty,Ilbele lglat or Downer*.Lot 2.s Section 1.torah.M NorQt Reg.I East 1 anal.r'Trldl•n Lao'403 at at•port as w Las Melt.of said Tract St a.M point le.42$ da.obed N foibr. rad•*Waco of I U.Oewrrrent aid FWrr.Mr Line and �said E. Dcarorcing N Or Northeast Corner of Geld(slabs 1 Vacs 6.o1'-26'.4*••-aloha tits tiWa'j Lat.of sad(.cum 1•dktaets of 2644.42 I.N to w What V4 Carr (Moat.In J.rfr.on CouriY laelengton. of saki Patton 1 Ptr.c.It OP 26'.4V E,Wong sad art $j Lrlta.•distance of 30.00 feet.any.a.N'-!3110't,•✓wane.of 6000 f tst to U.SwM...t Co.,,.'or said Tract M arr•THE PONT CP 01261**. thence N.Or-26'-4eE, •iag We Easterly iwga of ClraIad area,all Ma. {_Wu of That N and*1. 1 I...tan..70W)f.N.three Dar-rT'-37 E.•*Waco of 626110 foot to w 6.14.rd Ooh arts✓+Made Lew Ponca R 04'-34'a+'E.along.old Meander Lae. 0TH a1tl. a dstanc.of 2464 feel.1loroa N.111'-26'-210 E along said seeder Ilya•*Marco All drawees Ira the roof p rods of any*nature w.vuctren.ad+HO.ey.,p.r►atg of*7.60 rant.sow N WY.2L'-2V E.•W�l said 1'IrMr Lent•dawns.of QM rat. a...,or ob r eider hard w0aoad area shall he iercted tleen.gl.•*roll boas*upon Pao*•Riga of*a E.a dwr...d so•plat o to U.a Illookorha.001.0 Meg..of w.IL 3 Way N Nil,IVY d la d.davis r saki pct of eSay• Na a of time a. to w 3 eP..1y erne_rho DO e row ley M C pan ar Ml.why uwryrt d Nld Pe.t. .Way,•deter.a Zan feet to wo w b a darer .hMd.or••lad r of said.N COMM"of neat M Mica fl 41111'41.-30'4 along N co Nw1Ir1y Margin foot et w tam d•ppllowlen for• se oath IN for ow. tall b N a rMtArw p any of.old Part6ae Msy rd 6oMhrly L .of said Tract M a dstatee M 13660 reel eptlatr.tore.err LL cs.prrs.airs WIN stall w dread by the.Mnwan Carry Phases aai pries'(Oeprt era ar+.. .g w Promo of w.cwpar.ay pen* to Vs t .*PONT a SEdalrtl fa ay wan arratro or radians tali naaNW ay w PtMl•I•w Departwert Ytst err mots.Itse bibs.brood w awro.arr.with w wisalttd war approved plan Oda*.Jeffren Covey,MMlenoto.t Cara r.4 war '"''�Me LA nv S ar _,ntL. a ." G50.S.,...w%-r--' =AD02 ow/wan, r /l•yd or Cool overdo Triom all proem by Mao presents art I,err rwdr.lgrd,carer a foe ,`• r MC •• L A- rl-"r^1r, arpiw r w pe...Nw of w lend Tree Ae.arrn.mZ chi d.afre Gbnt•aI we dead / Vas dart plat.awl w eaaerwas aspicad harem M be awed by y free W and carat. '. ti dears..lay*I Panay met y nerd this al.y d +•uy„n QO I.w*Ta Ion Poor of 2.rrr.on co,nty w.w,gtctt lr.by eery that WI rail property taw due asap Oswalt*req..ed to corer aslcpated �t ta w property in W.star rye hVVy lass paid up to K MLf.Oas+� Udl.g roar I4 fieaol.on firao.r C ly Tr+...~ Mato d ti rwrgton 1 JN Camay of!drones ) ���1p B�J]fALS tf..b to ertay Yet en.wrory yLey 13411.bap..y w Q w WY at .drove_ to wt he N�{e�neaid and sealed !"••�•d.d Approved Yf.z�..l,IF d ��•/ n!/ Po saw r Ids awry a*and des fee as wa arpapaw Wren ` 'LL.t-.1/ 7 t — sow NaMd Ws.err is atttt..bed to aqe.•.sold I.vre..nt. Miriiei9 all eulsg D+prwa Pssctrw •jnnwrr *NNW .N1 the day d•d yew fiat above w& I. :.alt .s t• `t P>, •end approved YnYgday_M./0�1./•tRl+�n Q( at+rte N. r.. • —a%` �G"j Y�} • 1 :71.transt1 ►ealp J.Ifwsan Corny 11ealW R•sP a . 'fir.. �'�S NOTICE TO POTENTIAL P1/MC24ASOPM L.LOT*CA RATED WPM*SNALL NOT I*ROEM1IR DIVIDED M ANY MMHRR E.a.Md approved Wa'?�d•y d a+'r+ .15 li MIT111a•P/MIOD O MtrE Al YEARS NA14OYT M FILMS Q A AML LOWS �•`R „ PLAT. Aaronson=Ity Milt Vole Doprt.ra Layton 1 A SWSWE OIIP06AL RIVET NMI DEIN 10M®MR LOT 2 IIDOM PISIPAT 14211301131110.is STRUM PEST In METALLED CQMIL.PIT VIM RR PRO•MQIS OP TIaS rw...M PUPPET E VALID POR CNN TI. gMCN AtOUt/711CR ea .1!A0. A YEARLY R1EiWM.M PERMITTED POR •MAXIM*Q TOO f2)YEARS. UPON IPPIRATION OP Pa ElW/GE DISPOSAL PIROOEL M NOT AilARMITEND MD N UNRCT TO►NRIiR APPROVAL Q A IlteRD!SWAGE O'PGAAL APPLICATION.(CONTACT Ph Its w err ne.pwt of Davro Eva*a AD(OC /1 eIC.W. . ha!PERSON COUNTY MALT*DEP•RTILRA __,,L c dry d n IL at_.vwr pat�.�A and ��aa secede*b Vara of*WORT PLATS.Pages yob•NC Rr;wd.of 3.ANY 1e1OVAL OP.OR MAJOR DI*1MlASKE OP SOIL 1114.4 Tit 1'1M0►O�D Jof/.nee Lwrtry Wfirnglw riereaEL •MOW SW?OMATE WE CONDITION.THAT MME IIMCCEPTADLE y,an • t` NOR M 6MTALLATION OP SEWAGE DRPOIA.61.11171!APO COLLD SNALDATE M MARE DISPOSAL PERMIT. 2'c.ay Auditor 1. 4. NO POTAELE NAM SUPPLY M PROVIDED Qt TEL MICRT RAT.CRY 5•Wty I2#"'‘..- !A`�7 CP PORT TOY I WTTER E AV•S.AVLE AWACEA TO Till*EL ` 5. AC'CE33 CA•TD ~TAME WY PILO Krr.74#T- 01r66 = Q. )offs. Corny SHEET 2 OF 2 era. on • 3,59312 . . , ,• 2Rl1t'.im . . 5.P. Ya- i ______...._..„... ._ r ,'jt I .: j iI R i t! ` n Fr. 9 1 9n05 i N. NASON SHORT PLAT SP II-90 - 7 A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 • . Twp. 29, Rge. IE , W. M. Jefferson Co., Wash. • ... SPACEto fz6i..ltt•:1 °-i� ;, I 1:' 1 swlt =' ': ��•Fe"/°� °� ' (Being a Replat of Tracts 87 88, Irondale _, __ f•{Art.'GAL A S C I A %a►tl+lAl T s* A•'F'A1 • , 'LOW*: w.:.�FArc AlZfA, NO TIev+ >, Acre Tracts per Vol. 2 of Plats, Page 14 5 :-;4` ` _�'-., TAKE �,, Jefferson Co. Wash. LE VICINITY I rtO Y//// 'OAK MRP If' gL :, pP� (HO SCALE) I Pc Gtr • •t 011$/$ of servo s ,(RP WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH ZONE PER I r TR/ AREA CRP 177 AERIAL MA/�PlNO OF /980. ALSO { I . D£TERM D BY MEASUREMENTS BETWEEN THE —J .. NER Of %SECTIONC7, THE 29 N.,, RAMS(3E.,t✓M 7n , PORT c AS REACTED H£RCON. PORT,.' ~77'40 y�ELAND 3T ,Y.-Wirer! A. A,,CED E,DY•7 r +1 /MEANDER UNf oz , 's0 /!` g 88- /7•5V5 •, =�:LANE—TRAC7 I>r {♦:� ® t.:::.\\.- St.1�' 8 f� ) OO rig 4 .`I T 1 \h 3• 0 J E/ LVVV t , Iar,ti EASEMENT ` O/ / © 1.* \:. 5 PA C.E / DOT 2 \q `a N),04 1 / . ;rti Fm T� .5./4 AC. ` [ C�iS_ •9F/VT t' ' o/5/203014 ` \,, •» :3 L� , v AREA '. �' ft i tt © p AMT oo — Nd7' /9' 50'W fD MWIZ �`��iNiv i ArAPL-a-0•✓_ lAJI-_-- se -- -- • e00,00 -;i} f6.51•I of C ,D 0i t-.� =---- • ,u88•/9in.:V. -••1 . j trAelV`R - --- V " AY EQ,AE pr n,nr/rwr e00.00 PORT/40r H ea. 19' 30" w `1__R 5 94.tG L PD. I',e■'CONE.RPEtr • \ 4.q %%I 90) L£GENO NOTE ,� . V CNE14 NTAT/ON �• SET RE8NR "/L.S P0442 /D d9P see .Sneer 2 or 2 �CNEME !/� S�'aGE1 FAR STORM DRniN.4Gt R£OU/REMENTJ. Q•f N0 LS.21ab5 RLtY•l[f c.AP--_—_--( is D h o?"'!A f/ELD ,M ' E/07CNTS MADE MiTH `1 Q 3 r 77rAG 3Ti1T,tw INFRARED ECM(touttreAtH) USING FIELD TRAVERSE 74 -. e AA(D Rri4- 3U sw, vu.SEG.7 ���� `sa" W CtptURE /PCCT-T OR EXCEEDS Rum • „,111y,,, ACCURACY STANDARD A3 PER ,,/AC. .' v J ;bAeCt 'CSC-/JPOfO.”V i t A f 6 R A P H S /04 Z- 73 •.56I0 /�wlTAdiE I,l'1 Y '�.w' .,,,,. . 1"4'. . •. A✓�?j .. t pD-/r eo w ask/.7/ score SEE .Niel ?If? MSC NOPCIC n �o yo II CJNPLAT TED 7b Av/sM7 At wHCNA.se es. 14 AtO / r . 4241"1" suryeYOr e t -'CTn aUdtor M 1 I --4,- d 'MAT MIS s*NWT PLAT . POSED UPON �j . �� fINQ f0[ nm. in D - bt .!fit ,19AZL, I lIACY, THAT ' :;.i011 !/A T. {A bock -'l. of plots,d pow /11_•!ltd the f1MVCT, THAT TK MIMES ADD OIfTAAlCL1 All! WOOD TIIESKOK AND THAT ALL lKow a° rr.4(.f AND _ ).. . d. RACED ON THE SPOUYO ' , > 4 __ -. •, 12!27 M9D ��IL�J PINS/d t Auditor b "' date* K�PL•90 `��� e V YPS.5 c. 3. 9302-__ --KIA0..-4 ; '1't1.7i 1iI 1 S.P. roe 2 11 18I • [ .Q r. _ , , ) ,..6.3 c ri.... , ,- •i , ., ,1 . .. ►Fil. - } DEC 2 1 2005 I _ , ..MASON S+ 4O �r L AT 5F . i{ O . A PORTION OP 000[11PPIDR 1.01 7.r11CTION L 1004141•21 M RANGE I A 1 U AMETTE M I L C NN CP AO A IeLA Of•P0110101 Q TRAG16 6 AID M W.aDALE )M r COUNTY WA6tRl6TCH LZDALIZINErana plat recorded n Ael. mil portion d Treat M and IW portion d had i1 Vas OArth1. o the Wows/ Thant parer d at• 1' •1 rd Tract d.or Miens Air.Canty orb an p . Ion me 14& IT A.n Yea 1M pia of G d .Awe 1iC our lh. s*t tort. recorded at of Do 2 d P4u.M rsg•w0.IMcord.W Miens*Range I,W.Miallam t me M .n Vohs*2 d Myu,R.cae.d Jdr.w cwMy YlrMnp�a d..Doyenne*d t fold 2 ti e.nwn Z row.r+P r fbrv�Rag• Sri u a Me Las•A'.prprMe at•poet on the UWt.ky lid*or said Tad 01. Mw poP b.M ! feat NorthW4 d is 6osahrM.Y!Comer of*Id Tract in Uwe.rumin8•or•1O- E. •distance of•OS)T feet to the 6w.nrw.t ileendir Line ad?..we/of salal Line W. Veered LM1.d.+Id 6.cUw.1a distance d 2644A�2 fain to Nut West V4 C Vie d dd Section 1 thence N Or 2e'•46'f.slap saki WMtfYA Len.,I Omen.of 6ttuaa u Jefferson Canty.Wt. ro't 3000 r e4 ewe.A• ••1•110'I,a aacaim of W00 feet w the 6outls.m along a of said Try Margin M d Cheered*ro.4 naN Lt.w d Tract N ad OT. •ko.tp the E••t.y unt a7 •O.tae.Tarn Peet,three Erb'-n'-31•E.•Two. 42e)0 Peet to tear Oakroad Government rl.ad.Lew tier.•04'-3A'-31•E.atop MM Mend.Lear, •distance of D(O4 feet.theme N 111-76'-29'E along sad amwtdw Mr.•dinars* of 62,0 fee.Woe.H 311-7111•2e'C done did Mewl*LM.•detain_of aM feet. AN drainage Ire the reel or roof*day structure of.trttcYrea ad drreea•p•rldna thorn.•N'-n'-ST R•*moo.of TA sheet Us tlr Yrmemy Mingo of Port•g.Wyy aeon of other.allay rid wrfaeed ante/dud be directed 4N.. •stayed I.maurd upon An told Pagel of • •is d.dc•ted in did plat or bads*Acre Trace Mona.•30'-00' aid Ieta•nl •giro 00•W.. Wall W..bmy Mr9ti d dd 1•w u�.Way,•dma.oe d 24r6 rem w We -. P•120200:1:0:••••Mw 60 f�lttat t9aLL Pr difi►wCaney N'1"W'*'D '^eta" 6wuw.m a•_of did Tract M Paean.N.14•Ir-6a al,•lop the N'? �1*Wen °'•b en twl lnyi pe'h me/yvotw d•resldare or any d dd Portage Wry ad 6oWiti LIMA d sad Tract M•detente.1* tO Peet al tl t tie d•Pp6.etbn mp • oo to g t.neK dea W•ward by the MAROON Ceany NnVetVp upon rM.Ian. wn••elllt tfM ree{Yew.ntl wfMw landed d the eee}.ey pond to Ur RE PONT OF CM6M6b for my s re.tdemea dal rrtmed by Ws MIAs Winn Deparr"tt Wt the swum he/ben,eeuued a eavaurre dM tier bloomed and approved ph* ENdte In Jeff croon Lawry.WM.Itgtut (dm/ on Nee.../.-'�a,4'.-ke2f--.H1(. L ..�. p••r•aaa. . ,,,,d..r�..4Orrb/ea ..,'' .YGt •`.. T..."�-C'/y Know"a,paned u, poweer mated Port I,Pe Pa w&dde/.tw.d.and dealing cbN(or the a.r /'` Oft rherI plat.and ear.«erns depicted heaves to be.tedd by•y True.11 ad w .*. �7-I I,lb rlaear..t Thews*or Jenard"CouayrWashington.bombs In tunes..h.r.d I r'ansby•et e/9 Pena the=day d�iL� n/a au real property we/.ate edw doomt. «ryr«t to tame on Pe prcpa•ty n 1/le soar Mr rov.been pawl up w and eetd.g U.year MJL'r� ALASZOILErarna M .or motivate^ J J• Ca.atg at J.Ner.en J 81=5C3021-2 tn'.it_a_'h• yen_..w_ A,appwerl d+J w.�•.a4w•wwted E,•nrd rd apprw.d w.a 404°r 'r�./ 1p?/ Yea ear r W vMwtary~ad and deed for the tars and PrPM•a Pen* 'tut, Yo^iVMF� awed PM he lt•tNrrtaed te e.rwae•Old WTI*. ry•rr*�8 and ewlsg D•►at•'•'• °' jy1�k *el Or dg•ad yaaf fM lba,r erltte t .�. Lk .. and approved tilt_�day d --_,I3 It. t i= �J n • ear•:•• h• - -• r' - ._ R.ttrae,[2 LS mac-/ D�.rtlt.�rl 0 F �f+, • n 4.'7• Dreup JMl.rwn Lary WaIM. NOTICE 10 1•016111••L Pl••rit•lERW, d r ,f! Ede.rd approved t h6Z'. ns L TWO 110140JT TtM.WADED a:A ANY , .Addy r2.R.... • IL PLAT. Jefferson Ge lnry Pdaltc Won.Dap•rtsenl Dusan. 2.A 646•6E DIWPOA L RPM*NA•B PI 116rE23 row LOT 2 OMR MOO Min.Y M MT64 MST W4 WALLED C peters IT W t.4 1'14 P1110111/011143'TN*Pl1W1R.M Mtn 4 vALD POR cos 1'!M PROM AtOvralteR h .1790. A 7*AILT R6NINNAL 4 POPPETT=D POR •NVQ9Pt Q TWO(2)7EOT6. A* ITILD A T10N O M aWtOi p BEGOGIVianarrAtt Par mead DrEPO6AL rummers*NOT AtL•Ia•Yf I PO YOB d DAND Ev.Ytl I Ab60GA/r/[6A NC. A .d A P*01AL OP A 1l4aED KiltaE DIWF"OAAL � R TtE JWFFWIMON r.OIWfTY t4K1w pE1.AR1flNTl recur r VoW of*SOW KATE.Fagot.06• L Rrcand'or S �a J.tt..o.Canny Wai.pton a 3.INT 011•RetovAL d.OR MAJOR 71 SITE C Ct Q SOIL WrIWN M PROPGRP F Lea•M4LD Jta4A6 w►7 cRUn SITE coNDfTIO3l6 INN API y•CCtf"fALLE eft-• POR M INSTALLATION OP 6EW►•Git DNPO AL fTNIM1'16 APO COLD NKDATe M a .6&DRPO6aL PEWIT. County Aadtor >• 4 NO POTABLE WATER 6trPLT a moo=Cr T6)SNORT PLAT.CITY b Q PORE 100H1 0W71OebAVa.•ausOOMPH'70 iNM i a. 3. MCC$ 3 GWTO PCtpTFOf /WY PLR selemIT Q A *Wasson Couay ti••�►g • E =, • rc .1r,r 33 wv2 ,. Iy li t t 1 NASON SHORT PLAT SP II-90 _ :--._ :.. . A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 . • Twp. 29, Rge. IE , W. M. Jefferson Co., Wash. • • ..• SPACE to gH01fNT TV.1 ' 1, (Being a Replat of Trolls 87 88. Irondale , , - :;1 , :- I .arc P e 14 5 v°R a :: �;. �;�� ..:S.A r: ARfA.. ..thrum{ A, re Acre Tracts per Vol.2 of Plats. ag ,,0a FI11J01'I, A * rt l O81 oR Ft nr+mss Jefferson Co. Wash. r MO r 43.44h0-'TAX* F'L - ' -- LE y1C/N/TY r 0 %/// • opt( MAP aD PC" "'.OPJ fm 5CILE) I P RPG1,, L... ww e,s of 5/ /JAJN/ AN06T 7NAT£ SYSTEM NORTH 200E .5 ` , 3 AREA CRP I77 AERIAL/1LrA3(JRE�lEN gET4/EEN THCO I __i -4"DETERPIAVE-0 ZS,' WEST QUARTER GORN£RN /P 290. RAN6E3E, To COR- NER Q� `s£Cf N 7, TLW/ PoRT AS pEPKTED NfRCON. tUDGON yrreo . 3T v"runty, _ �+ + s 4 s o alb ou tot • ' 4L . 'O .\ /7.'7 E X .. ,ta. t -- 88- /7'37 E ' �4•7� ) OO 8 �� M16M .,'"--°A)i Q \ �;PAC.E LOT 2 a (ry EASEMENT LOT LOOT Ac •p aM FOR 3./s nc t t\- EF15E/` ENT 3 �o a • SfPT/C er� .�.,t ti 4 ° ovsF+a+� •J:1 " © r LDT i 111 t / /9• '-� W J IsSi AT acute posT y € AREA �� _ \ i I siT 0.• cwYt•D A./-�°,sis-�' .=---- IRdB'19'S>7-tr/ €1pAV� -_ ---�. AY roo.o0 i — ast y iwrn.aT poRTAGE N ea- /`►• 30" W `�--\ 594. e4 \ MOM ..•/ C 0) fr t1f+R l-4O) NOTE: / • L£GCNO SEE -3: 2 or 2 MONUMEMTATION •• sET REBM "/LS. 20412 ID CAP FOR STORM Lwn/N 4C K `' °/GHEME (1Y10 SCALE) R£aUIR£MENTJ.----------4 , * o-fMa LS.21445 REAM[{ text, .4 VI 1 e � F/ELO rm-AJJREMCNTJ P 1110E W/TN . a •,, I 83 ,- TOTAL 57$FOW sir/mac-0 cote (tnpRZRiK) US/NG FIELD TRAVERSE yy WW.StL.7 J AND IYYION^L Jt/RY£YT?IODJ. ■■.■ r v v CLO3IJR£ /MEET-' OR EXCEEDS • 88 1 'r , AL-C[ Cy ST/►UTARD AS PER pLRC. ` t) t `tome 3JL-/30-0}0.PARAGRAPHS /W{LAI• 11111111111111 Icdue%.3 1 TWP. 2911. RGC,E.W�`7 se. MBE A - ea-/r o-w II1.It - solo IF? •fYR NoT1lL u Kp ,to 3iE 5Nf2T ? 1. � (IA/PLATTED no p��grTlwt fwRC/lwseRS. sCi .E /-,6. >E r- ,i S. CA p,etor�f f.f � wrvrvo►'I _its. ."-'�iyTT, ?� PLAT If fA1CD �IrON � .4 I auditor s• C rtl IC On off s;1Df41-f ---- I9-fL. at I WWII �aTry THAT TIM encerr "�,41�F7VV. �: THAT TM =AMU MID DISTAAtCCI ARE SHOWN fly mm. In Eook_.�--of Waif,d Do9t d 1M �T Tura Au N OUIRED sTA (.1 ww • �!!i� .aM d PLAC(C ON TM[ *OUNO- .i% r2r2/z�- --- I•so — r/•1i }pudllor ° dew ,'t 24-90 Jefferson 5VY/43 334.3. 1 •1t1 ;',';•r Ir.TI It 1 s•P roe 211 181 _______„,..... ..........._..... _ . _ _ . . . . t, „..,9 .1 ,-,!in ii F I l( " Y 1 ` . : DEC 2 1 2005 L X11 , s NASON S OAT FLATS . 11 - 90 A PORTION CE aOV[I INMINT LOT 2.111ICTICAI 1.TOYNMV'71 NORTH,PAUSE I RA61 YILIPETTE MOW"AMTIPOON COMM 1•41141M6TON l BIM ALSO A AMPLAT d A POWT1CN Q TIMCTS 61t AND 60n SeOIOALE AC7a TRACTS,PD!VOW"!2 OP PLATS.PASS 1411,INECOND6 CF JOPER6QI COIMY W WN6Tdr Ail that portion of Tract M and that portion of Tract/T lying$OMArfy of the lotto rig TM..Portions of Tract el and Tract dr of Wonder Acre Tracts,par plat recorded In derrber sr•A!Is 11m plot of WcrnYM Acre Tracts per tdr plat thereof recorded at volume 7 of Pat.,at P N6.Records of Jrferson Cov.y W peMg portion W 9•M .N Wire 2 d Plat.,Records d Jefferson Corr yF 1.rgtet bow g d Govwrwl Lot 7,N Section 1.ToorVy A North R..g.T Est,ur to 1 • it LM'Ain MgwrMg at• ILMtarly Irlt•d said Trap. 1 d S. et b0••ll•L. dwcUW to Sailor beet NorVrry of ter comm.d. Id Tract 61 firs, •diranee of bC6JT ire to Pr CianNonert Meander Lea.•rd Trreds of said LM A. Cosr.rc at U.Norteret Conn d Said bectbn 1 thence&Dl•-1v-y'W..Iona Vr YWt*r•iy Lear or said 6ecUan 1,a dram*of 7•44.47 few to Pr tar 114 Comb 6nuate N Jefferson Crary,Irehinatort of saw Section 1 there N Or 2W-4W E,along said Westerly Lew&a dWanrs or Dom feet,Vesre S.w••PJTiO•L.a Milan&of WOO sew to Ur Srafreet Corner of said Trap M and TWAT PONE Q p[yMRra, Vence K Or-76'-4i'E, •Iona Or reeery Margin or cleveard frost,and Westerly Limns of'root M and el, •distance 7010)seer Nance Na•-n•JT L a diet ace of•2m60 sew to the deam.OoveeM Memde ter Vrnde S Os-L-3l'E-along wed rW,der LwrN. & •rotors of 1104 halt throe N 11'-76'-7Y E Wawa said weeder Sir.• y_.-___ Al Merge.. the reef w roofs of any structure or NrAc.a.a and orinerr,p• .M d 6710 Ioa4 lion N SY-76'•77Y[,rang sad PNarder Line.•distance d AM few Here S M'-rrJ. L a daiere d 7L_ Tram to the .f •re,or orb annals hard ebhe4•sees dire be acted Omagh a•yM Petalled upen N said d w taeAeated N rid We.tary rW9e' Portage��}^v' ur proP.rYy no elver U,.e w raw r.nwn, ` «d Installation Pan OW yL. seal Westerly Margin d saw plat Wny,.rotors of feet,C1,1:1301 Mr w b be a41 wbert d and the JeMeww AbSe Werke Wprteewt C n the time of aPpM�MYn for•bMldna pewit for oerMUCtre d•r eldowe or alit LMler/ d earl Tract M three It err.,act II SL lag the of MrgN Morro epee t)nia Wt. Comilla re math tinree�. swell be amber by the Jerlisen of said Peruse W.rd ecWnarly Lrha d sa d Trap M•distance d 6J660 r.N Corny Plrobg and�•Ita D•petreel.eSlrka+a�Mthe Warp of ire ocape al purr to de nom PONT CP OEdare/1 f swum het or bee mw•ees w■ .I Ours submitted apprComparator v plw wt w Mato in Adamson Car'•y,Wd'•'8ttet Crerri or err if d ,nit. T7rG1RAD0! d `'2L• y ...ta•. Wow Me pores b!R Vet present.Vet 1•the�etdeNgr{orb b fee .,�'• 'PO 's-: .a.. ,v-t+L.f Myer.a w passer or d Sr and hoer fSttee.+eLi art dear, c, or M,,V 4 W.V 1 plat and the ea mreM deputed hereon M be crowed by my f Rte eel and ca.er& N eases.hoer I hereby.•t y had Ow.Zrday d J(,fnr—,h Q(1 I.W rlNrsaw bea..eer of Jefrenon Cou.ny ua.ha.gton h..by ceruy that au real property taw due swarm doors..repine to cover anttclp tad ' WAN en the property..}raced N OH Were A. hon.been paid Lf to i, ,igoe "hi.— and Including Om rue 4`�1 Ti.P`Nee{.ort J.f/anon Leuny'r` Tr«rirel— N.»or W.wgton ) r Games or JeNerson ) �T c1 Mh1 B[C@QYILS Tea b to cerUni Vet an Na.7g YyyealA°'° Ts YQ,better M the O twAmfdreml IOW deoair. ae •direr_ to appeared Simi P. Newt elito Po Merl and wtw � E.ar+d.d approved w. day d .� 0/ n 9/ the seer as We ve a lady Or and deed for Or rte and prpeer bereft .it-L!/l 7/Q[-tJrwie L- P ,./` wean.,rte he b aMrrtrr td erb.Vlo saw,almost. Mambo and Dulldrg DepateeM Dovecot WWI 111 U.deg ad par find above willow .. Lkin ,. J ".2..... .r :��_ e...r.,p'"°approved tow L clay d J r�_ n 41 4)3P•74'TS °A n•ewena .�1 My Director Jefferson Cary NORIC=TO POTTIN AL MileCH IScIY. 1.LOTS CIEATID m1hEN WALL NOT OE RatTNER DNOWD NAM'MAINZ I E'a•wwa appraw•l t'We.rld•H as Aligiata ,A 2 WI NN A PWPSOD OP MI 16)'TAPS WIT TII<ALN6 O A,AML Lair PLAT: days r�1S...•– Jeffe ton Ce raj?Voir Worte Daprtww LMceer 7.A IMAM DISPOSAL PlISYT NM OED!WOW FOR LOT 7 ISpWR PPM teem TOW M SYSTEM MOT WE NRALLID CONINSTDIT W M M PROVOC)IS OF TNS Mahn M PEIMT IS NOLO RCRS ONE"MAW PROM MO4UP?. R L! .MO A'EMIT RIM*.O Plait TM PM A MA)01/t CP TWO fL TEAN& UPON Ek#ATION OP M IMAGE DISPOSAL R/rOSWS M NOT auMworrineD Amp 4 S1D.aLT TO mimeo' APPT.DVAL O A ramaRD MOM DISPOSAL AITLICATKM(CONTACT PI for et U.nenyr.t d DAVID EVAha I ASSOCIATES HC.,W. Tin!. TVl.1 N COURT t6IALTN DEPARTPOR1 cloy d III jr",,at ,,inns.peat and ll worded b Vote d WORT MTS.Pages M'- !•Iaeoords d ].MK rI¢1WK CP.OW MAJOR D4l1' AS CE OP SOIL Mar M PROD Jeffries Cants Wmrl.diet DAA$P LD AMA*MAY CREATN SRI CONDITIONS TWAT Ala INACC!PTAaLE ,say • r• POW M NSTALL.4T1011 Q 6Btali DISPOSAL STSTQO MOD COLD INVALIDATE M IS SWAMI DOPOIAL PER1T. Count'Auditor e�aa 7+ l NO POTABLE WTDe SISTLT IS 1'IaWDm DT 1166 SNORT N.M.CRY E ..... -J"� CP PORT TOSISWIO WATER O AVAILABLE ADJACENT TO TWO BITE D. ACCE5 avrO ibcr/wge tMPY AST fLcgAwT 4 O 4Li -a. Jeff/mot y 3 54-IEET 2 OF 2 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 615 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington • 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org October 29, 2007 Ryan Tillman PO Box 1375 Port Hadlock WA 98339 RE: Fred Nason SPAAD Application MLA05-737 and Sewage Disposal System Permit Application SEP06-180 Section 7 Township 29N Range 1 E Parcel # 962-700-108 Dear Mr. Tillman: Staff from this department completed a site visit to the above referenced property on January 13 and 20, 2006 and March 3, 2006 to evaluate the site and soils for a SPAAD application. Observations in January identified a water table at 3" — 16" from the surface, inadequate for permitting an onsite sewage system. Subsequently I was notified that new soil logs had been dug and I made a visit to the site in March 2006. A design proposal/permit application was submitted June 6, 2006 for a 4 bedroom system and a revision was submitted August 10, 2007 for a 2 bedroom system. Specific to the new plan the following items need to be addressed prior to further review: o The plan submitted August 10, 2007 does not comply with WAC 246-272A and Washington State Recommended Standards and Guidance. Setbacks are not met as shown on the site plan. The use of the concentric reserve area requires meeting the setbacks identified in WS RS&Gs for Glendon Biofilters Section 2.4.4 for the entire perimeter of the primary and reserve areas. The system must also meet WAC246- 272A setbacks requiring a minimum 5' setback from the edge of the system to a line of easement. o Soil test pits must be identified in the system area and soils descriptions for the test pits must accompany the application. The following items were included in a letter of August 10, 2006 and remain necessary for review of the SPAAD. o Soil log descriptions must be submitted for holes A— E. o Please identify all soil logs evaluated for this site on the plot plan including the ones submitted for the SPAAD. o Two additional soil logs need to be provided in the infiltrative/downslope areas of the NW pod and the NE pod due to the extremely limited soils observed in the area. These can be 2' X 2' X 2' deep. o Identify the slope in the area of the system. o The original plat indicated that there was available area for a reserve to serve the existing residence but due to the new information regarding the soils and high water table in the area and the expanded area proposed for the lower lot, a reserve area for the existing residence will need to be identified prior to approval of the SPAAD. o The easement must be recorded prior to approval of the permit. Additionally, the conceptual plan for a system on the site does not comply with current code and Washington State Recommended Standards and Guidance. Setbacks are not met as shown on the site plan. I am sending a letter to the designer as well regarding the details that will need to be addressed. Please contact this office if you have further questions. Sincerely Linda Atkins Environmental Health Specialist cc Fred and Judy Nason Jefferson County Development Review, Zoe Ann Lamp Ryan Tillman P.E. Nancy Woffenden, Representative Nason, October 29, 2007 page 2 of 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH `"' 615 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington • 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org October 29, 2007 . Fred Nason 820 E Cady Rd Condo 3306 Everett WA 98603 RE: SPAAD application MLA05-737 Fred Nason Section 7 Township 29N Range 1E Parcel # 962-700-108 Dear Mr. Nason: Staff from this department completed a site visit to the above referenced property on January 13 and 20, 2006 and March 3, 2006 to evaluate the site and soils for a SPAAD application. Observations in January identified a water table at 3" — 16" from the surface, inadequate for permitting an onsite sewage system. Subsequently I was notified that new soil logs had been dug and I made a visit to the site in March. A design proposal/permit application was submitted June 6, 2006 and a revision was submitted August 10, 2007. The following items were identified in a letter to Ryan Tillman August 10, 2006 and still need to be addressed prior to further review: o Soil log descriptions must be submitted for holes A— E. o Identify all soil logs evaluated for this site on the plot plan including the ones submitted for the SPAAD. o Two additional soil logs need to be provided in the infiltrative/downslope areas of the NW pod and the NE pod due to the extremely limited soils observed in the area. These can be 2' X 2' X 2' deep. o Identify the slope in the area of the system. o It is my understanding that there is some type of drainage (typed stream) that comes under Portage Rd. onto the lower portion of this site. Crossing it with the effluent transport line will need to be addressed in the proposal. An HPA is required if it is recognized by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Please contact Zoe Ann Lamp to confirm the status of the stream/drainage. o Show the water line/s serving the existing site and the proposed site. Is there a well on the upper parcel? o If this area is determined to be in the 100 year flood plain a flood certificate will be required prior to issuance and the design shall be modified to address the elevations identified in the flood certificate. o Based on what has been submitted for review of the SPAAD the tanks and transport line are located in the wetland buffer. I am waiting for possible revisions to that plan but the tank area may need to be revised. o It is y understanding that there is some type of drainage (typed stream) that comes er Portage Rd. onto the lower portion of this site. Crossing it with the effluent t sport line will need to be addressed in the design proposal. An HPA is required if t is recognized by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Please contact Zoe Ann Lamp to confirm the status of the stream/drainage. o Show the water line/s serving the existing site and the proposed site. Is there a well on the upper parcel? o If this area is determined to be in the 100 year flood plain a flood certificate will be required prior to issuance and the design shall be modified to address the elevations identified in the flood certificate. o The original plat indicated that there was available area for a reserve to serve the existing residence but due to the new information regarding the soils and high water table in the area and the expanded area proposed for the lower lot, a reserve area for the existing residence will need to be identified prior to issuance of this permit or approval of the SPAAD. o The easement must be recorded prior to approval of the permit and the SPAAD. Please contact this office if you have further questions. Sincerely Linda Atkins Environmental Health Specialist cc Fred Nason Jefferson County Development Review, Zoe Ann Lamp Nancy Woffenden, Representative Nason-Tillman, October 29, 2007page 2 of 2 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 0 1)J — 1 W r W 11 J U i) 4 i f I 4 ''7 N, It 1 . . Legend it 0 . , .. ... ... , .., �..1 Selected Fear I I Paroets-H Contours *.t I0 Faa Carne 0 \PORTAGE •,,,AY fef 50 Foal Cuxw tt Boundaries 7 . , f J Was Y,- El Caritas Culverts-Dave • 012 0 0 3a V: 5:8:7 $9 '� s CuhreAs-CRIS- 0 1:2 -- 3a u • rx a 7 1° * a.9 A /o Road Netwrort- rr_u.r::Y+� r0 �u s''�'ry` rrt9t FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug : 2007 • http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C1 ientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 1. • Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surve ed ,„ v _, a tai A 10 2 a ., . , .....„. .,. ,, w u 11. INF +T oilori , k. f Legend _. p a Selected Feati L.= ../ Road System t ; 1-- Parcels-Parcels-Fr r . d ONR Streams t 3 , a • Type 9 F 4,,, Typo$ wf Tym4 Type3 • Type • Type 1 0 $ / "Aif O'er ,r Boundaries yam. 16 ce C El way ' „ Z: t n (Dim cm..= I is A 4tk 4,Of p FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug : 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed t 4 s yr a s 4 y , t a y y r. L Yom_ .t l �a * ,fr .W e- Ri t ��••• ,,tt _J a }, f • , +N ,. x. .. . ` i 4. "" }i" ,� _ �nF ,. ° Road System .10 4 t` iicI i 1 Parcels-1i I : . .L� .2 "7 e .y �. Shoreines-Arc *ti r CarenvacY•'S4r v i t g�p w 1 Cocerancir .lar. y �Flr ' L ". rs _ * ��T 4 �kEY -,%.p'r p d� ,.../ uUrnan D'�r l a . ' ■} +^.yr„ 40 3Q. •1 ��V 6rard mr'FrR 1 4 w. .x _ r _ Nary /� • ' a Nakra StWEm \ 2006 Aerial Pt 5, . r- a - Boundaries I alsw rr Ca , . �I watr .. ane ca..� FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug : 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=48/31/2007 444 °o r-i N OOA M CC Fj -` � p le yy tR • e ', D II u Y 4y Y 4 �_ III, 00 1*M,. CO oo p II t• II N _ ti Q S+ a o IID N N O N .. w N ?3 if $1 r, :Lf - : cu n • O _ k l ',5. T t�� j `r Fr F4, .^ •) �/ 40 lip*. . 1 Cn y , 3 Cti CA ley '. 4 M i I' , ,mom 0 i f y. tir o oi eL 0. 3 kH • a> z I Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed \\_, l -"---..,______ l' N L 4 yi — J US 0 �1 Legend •i_ a- / selected Feats I. , r i i, ,�,: Road System '-'5":6 i t ci' ' ; Parcels-H �osw....._.,H,W. Or i ‘?<, Contours ,t.', . 4.--, / ' ,i 4-1 t. to Fag cuw 0 � f" -1 50 Fax Cain" VIA SPIt,�CTDty LN' } _ . It#]' l Boundaries ri .ieelle,ancwar (\ ,/ ❑ way ❑ orQ Casa r 10 a ,e47 c 1 w ti f ;< p.. 4.... .35211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed tt 962700095 962700079 �t ii N —.-—1+ p 962700099. w ,> u J _ 962700078 1 _ ftriej -._ r° 3.. i 962700080 t2.52 e00102 -j Legend a:> --_ ,jf 962700075 --� c 0 Selected Features A I 0 Road System 962700074 ' _.T�_ ���. - Parcels-H 962700076 962700077. ,.4 _. 962700107 9e2/00''',C Q0 II Wetlands -`-`----- Boundaries WASHINGTON LN T,, , nCarty 998400001 �" 960300001 99 w 962700073 996400017... 996400003 °•i ',,'1° .. `998400016•', 988400004 n 4:,.cCcer.= , , ------ 998400015 998400005 998400013-- 9603C(XJM 9627000n ...998400012- ` :lc,ti, 921073018 `. .. - , 99840001 0 -- ie 996400008 J Msa Randal q ldbsm Carty Cants S moms GtS 996400009 4 "a FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 31 13:29:13 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed ii 3 962700095 .. ._. 962700099 —-- i W -- � t w __ 962700096 — i -1- ._. .- 962700097 ---- ; I r . ■ I --962700113 ---' r , ___962700112 —�i / 962700102 ' _ .027 Legend 962700th ❑ Selected Fear 962700110 y 3e „,r Road System !L_ f 0 El Parcels-H L— z CasicaI Aquifer 962700107 Areas 962700106 SANPA•&l il . 996400001 +/,, 960300001 / • n® sysc .. 9864002 ._—.__- H6400017 ..�- 996400003 i', SARPA `,9984000,6 ;:to O SARPA+LINK Boundaries Canty 996400010 _- 9603(%%307 ❑ 996400013 wafer Qi,F 996a00012 7 a 9603ooa0 n 000 921073018 @9L 998400011 9603aX . 996400007 .; 998400008 il W 96030:-::.: Maps aondei W Asicsan Carry Cents Sery ices IS 000099603040'1 9603000" II ,• a 3,r+211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 1-- ..9s2700c,c; 1 96270009196270009• 901121001 _._962700092 _ ``. �- --- 962700094-``' r` ,: �- _ 1 962700/04 / �`•, 962700103 901121004 ----- +` �v �'1 +r •. 962700045._.962700105 '11rn 962700066 ,982700095 H- Q 962700046 962700079 Q . % Z.'- r - 962700055-______..._ 1...1 9627000?`_ ./ l -"-`•t 96270009. 9 962700047 �' X962700097 / [-eyelid 962700078 §6270,, •. o Selected Features 962700060 - - - �• .J Road System 962700076 v 1� 1° 962a... / 952700074 96270007$ .,..�.-_ / Percel4-H 962700077 f 962700 } . Seismic Hazard / y Boundaries w 962799073 9� 9984X0G_' '--_- ... U ,995400005 c I^I wale, 462700072 9210110e 9964000.• l' j Gear Gamma w _ A i—y 018 9984000 -J '' _ 962700052962700071 96034X.. • 921073017 960300Y u •i —_, 96O3000 , ,-, ...-'•'117 962700070 i 921073019 1 ,! 9cn-irrrv4 962700070 — JJj[j� ^1 1 962700069 1 921073009 ', 921073022 92107302.' ). Maas=Mad W.x4blm Cary Ceara Straws GrS 921073015 a,.- ' FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 31 13:52:56 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 1 962700095 962700079__ __ _ - —mac.• N 962700099 y l — ,'_.I 962700098 ^I W ..262700096 1 1F--- f- 1 J 962700097 <+.. 1 I 2700076 iii ---..:- _962700113 - 962I 12 ---- � •F.2�-: . Legend 982700111 0 Selected Fear 962700110 ' Road System ird �0 ■ Contours. i A. 962700107 O •-+t =="_� :.Q 10 root Catex 1• __-- rye 50 foot Canon 1 - —._ i Priority Habitat 998406001 , Species 8108 908400017 `x—;998400003 960.300002___ { Boundaries l 960300003 I aeNs-.m Cowry 9G030000 .99840X/1 fl WAer 948400013. 8.. 998400014 996400V. 980300004 Ora-Camas F_ 998400013 99BA00006 __�.. LT d` 'V 996400012_1 —! 96030000' •�d Q..*y r yF 998400011 1 960300006 998400007. + ,v_._" 9603000Cd 't AA , -< 998400008 Cr960300C t li 99�,, I5} I ft 17' 1 `-'9603000W_ r ` 9660.906070 Mao wadded try.lelitsm Carry Cents&races C4.4 ',, I 9603000.. 0 :36211 !I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 2007 III http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 . Map Output . Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed II 962!0::(195 ... .H2 :•::::.+9 1: .- 1- .. ' cr, 96 .roixisr4 . 0 / / 1 e mimpiA Ai LU ,' > SY621C40,16 ..." Lil UMW app.; C.) 962!,.:•:+2,9! 9(32 PC.. "2, -Z4•2,,:ii".:2 Legend } , 0 Selected Features e Road System IL C) I I Parcels-H ¢- L...._ Shoreline Slope Sieber!), "A•2■C■::-ce ,C) Elhterrnadar ,.-:•::,MC.:.1.1," 11:1 :lactate ‘,96,1Cd.X.:02 ..,.;,.,1 ,„:„.:,,, 9964ccoz,3 Wif.:.3.1X:CC,2 Unstliae Raceit taxishde MI Urestati=Chl Land:ado 998.40rx.,6 99.54,:co::.1 :.,•7...:. 1.-.:.::•?. II Modial 99234CCC.5?..)98,10:0D5 9€J1:2,.:•::;2:-1 7i.8404,C,"3 Boundaries 0 .49.84(x.:cc.6 -7 7 Jeffer ..Y.X.X.X:6 sal Canty •"/- iii:5•03Q0Co::•:: 92'C.,.2.•::,'-B. SOY.:. 15. pi Water CC . 16 a I oilff ca.m. Li 99.5.1aKce Eg 1.96034:0,:.*9 99840X09 j-- ' 96.031.1C0*0 V xes a-aead uy-a440-sal Cam,Ca-na‘:2-1-MS(AS I 0511■36211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 31 13:54:42 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed 96270W95 + _ ��•.. 962700079 I 0• / W 962700099 ----- gg ------- ...-i 962700098 _----962700096 • 962700097 96zr000r s — _-__962700173 962100112~ i' 962700102 - Legend �_.__. 962700171 1 >, .•..•. - I Q 4' p Selected Feat 962700110 -� - Road System tj .C9 -- L-- c ,':r-::elks-H 962700107 .cr SIPZ 962700106 As Pack SOU 1 >llo a.sit saz nCabaCabals S1PZ 1 ? ��� �j �• Boundaries 996400002 996400017 . I eensym Cary 998400016r`, N • y 3 Warr . 948400U .. I I Oiler Cau.a 998400015 ' ' 998400014 960wa[iA 998400013 996400006 1-----:I 921073018 �y 99:540 ! I k_.__....1 998400012 ! 1 960300005 t 40 p_ 998400007 99&100008 19603Cti)::•__ .r I ti 9400009 96034001() -i.:..r.mdel try':dbsnl Catgr Ca*Ai Serwa5 Gt5 ` yu,;,yrri•.. 1 n 3crt1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 3 Features Not Surveyed sWiej ' 72 9621C4Y_,9b 21,::titi: W:2 11.:Or.)7.:.a LU eCCOM Cw32+COY?: 952 ' 2+ " a. gra CD %2/0(Yar ALwi ‘,A+1■Xv.Y3' 2i:•1■X `i6C 996,10:0::! 9984 corj•6 99440:0:,,i 99F,AUX`b 9984 co.)05 96C?COL-A Vs6,1,..Y.XY 0 V46.10e.XXX6 wv.',03coam, ,$) 998‘EXDO` 0 It 9984C0CCPY: vooactx•c• $.44r.,Ircreckxl ,seert.an tiels ynrecesiaIS 0 IMIIII■111 36211 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovrnap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/3 1/2007 Ma`p Output Page 2 of 3 Legend 0 Selected Features cirt Road System 1-1 Parcels-H County Zoning Rtrai Rasackmat't NB Rua Ralaitakel 110 Raa Reackagial 120 • Hataf hslustnal • Reaa.roe&rad Hi tin L...ie him-4 >AI 1111 Lic . Rts-a W Cankr . Crossroads GC III Cnamaals.CC III Crammed%NC 1 Camevotat Forast Ftura Farad ti Inhakint3 Fatal AP 120 AL 120 % „ Affaat EPF , %Vas*,Mgmt EPF $.,..Z.,. My Raksvaan Parks ad Raaaaban Nakano!Farad N o Pak Nararta%lug, Want Sacks IIIMFR Smgla Family MPR SF Tr. * MI SAPR Mullefandy PIPR Ramat Camara • IAPii Wave Cater .....V MPR OW SPaa MPR•Racraakan RUGA the O . UGA Mai Data Ras UGA4191 Dans Ras UGA•Urtan ta$01 taloa* IIILIGA Urban Canmaczat 0 JGA 1Asaa Onaread Can 11C,C.a EJGA Paalc :km Taw-sand JGA Icn Rase-cake, •▪ •10 arrsi Boundanes EDJa4rsal CCM t1 E War' EOlhEr Catrq es 1 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 • 4 Map Output Page 3 of 3 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its Ilection. Fri Aug 31 13:55:19 2007 I I I http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 8/31/2007 Map Output Page 1 of 1 .* Features Not Surveyed - `f �1 r • .1•••i • .� j -.. "'ye `. 41 _ / ■ t, s- f Legend ' - Aii: SeYected Feah 4 _ �. Road System t , e R Parcels-H V r*w 2005 Aerial Pt - . Baundanes AP A. FT �i Canty _r+F� f I wars la s 1 1 Ohm CavM1m '\ _.s >«.t,,ti t r .. _ ,',c §A -I . *tr ...JP Y Illi J , . .. Mats:rat clod V{:ebrnl C arty Celtzt SQ Tozer C t i 362f1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respec correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 2007 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion°4.... 8/31/2007 ' Map Output Page 1 of 1 Features Not Surveyed i pporrop tult. .. .741 ,. '. /4 � ti e Y y S IS /. II � . Legend _j ❑ Selected Features -, �� l ./ Road System I Parcels-H ley. °1 2006 Aerial Photos 5 Y MIL+ �ay�y}�,r Boundaries O StMawa Carty ❑ Coultas y4 LL --„, h A,j FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Aug 31 13:55:53 2007 I http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 8/31/2007 CO cmxic A. D D CO v O x 8 2 g 0 .r, TI D D TI ° ZV) x v) --I° OZS Z m m D m OZ T m m c � ° gm =O clOO v `cn > cc-1 t = f mp Dm ° 0M co0 (D*t 00 n zo N n '7 `� �y M x x D p _ Z °m ° W� vZ n p \ i= F-+ -1 OC � w m .ZmIW �,Zmj'� MX OS Z z 0 m :it-- �1 cn - o° �1 z m OC z ZA Z- � mp - O ~ Z m rL -I 0 OOZr A� mn v-n 71-• m C N X12 f*10 tNiiUnl� Zm ��.° O -0 X 0 71 o `1>A3N NV m y� -1'v D N D D 11) cn _o OD CI vv) v O ° n m -i N CP N $ mcnv " I I �' Do› 0 5 r 0 .1 D 0)i CO v W oz°0z wrnDmF coin Z O F D Xi 7XC p W 01,0z �.lQx zz Fj p D Z W N N - v m o W o p I [n r 01 0) 0) fi ,�. ,-,- fi '1 N W � < * m m CO C w o; m m > 002 m x m"S U) vKZ -I - .0 CO zo,- v-��n C p O ;-. :-r • ?�� °-< 0 M Zvm XC) ,Apps 9< M6S v4* 4 _____________________, 4,t•74 do Z D ,� �r'y 30.2Q6 3 m o 0 O 0 ,,��` Op mo r- m o Z_ D = �,�� SST ° co G� �. `404,, m / I V s D r, 44% ,�1 0 ° —' u) m x CD \*).**; m s v, co ��0t' 4. O o I 001 0\ r 44 4, -,.iL.1 I 7 " .•�`" 0 0, . 0 0 0 ■ rn jai opo- I//�� 1 �>` 1 551 (4 44��� A � fd z0 x °i- x o p, rn 01 c oZ ZCM \le06 `3Q` o c0 z mo ° QQ, m 111 , ° � 7 ° gym v �° 9 Q°�� _ 0 - —I \ n ° I o-I -1 I I n CO p 41\ -Z-I II x0 C `` L61. FRONT D �GF z R°q0 w",SON (be., c �e �9 5'h ° JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director October 18, 2007 Nancy L. Woffenden Hadlock Realty& Development Co 211 Chimacum Rd. Port Hadlock, WA 98339 RE: Nason Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination—MLA05-00737 Dear Nancy: This letter is being addressed to you as your name appears as the designated agent on the Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination (SPAAD) application. I have cc'd Fred and Judy Nason, Tanya Royer, Charles Law and Rosemary Reich as a response from them is required, as well. Attached is a copy of the comments from the Department of Public Works regarding the setback reduction request. I would like to set up a meeting with you, Fred and Judy Nason, Tanya Royer, Charles Law and Rosemary Reich. Attending this meeting from Jefferson County will be a representative from Public Works, our staff wetland biologist and me. The hope is that we can sit down, discuss all of the site constraints along with the information already available and come to an agreement. After this meeting a new site plan and revised wetland report which represents the agreement will be required to be submitted. I have tentatively scheduled this meeting for Monday, October 29, 2007 at 1 p.m. in our conference room. Y Y p Please let me know if you are available to attend. If this time does not work for you please suggest an alternative time. Please contact me at the above address or by e-mail at zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us or by phone at (360)385-9406. Sincerely, i� i•- Ann Lamp ssociate Planner cc: Fred and Judy Nason Tanya Royer Charles Law Rosemary Reich Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 e-mail: ascalf @co.jefferson.wa.us FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON 623 Sheridan COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PO. Box 2070 rt Port Townsend,WA 98368 ,• t (360)385-9160 Frank Gifford,Public Works Director Monte Reinders,P.E.,County Engineer f 11 l; l L LI I OCT 1 6 2007 IL) i { MEMORANDUM �-- JEFFERSOr, CCIINTY DEP1. 0FC),o;.ur<if`, Nr :IO' EN,i TO: Zoe Ann Lamp, Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development FROM: Terry Duff, Engineering Tech Ill ,Id'1 , DATE: October 9, 2007 �c�J� SUBJECT: Road Setback Reduction Request—Portage Way./Nason APN 962700108 Public Works has found no advantage to any roadway to reduce the setback from the right of way. The following information is being provided in response to your request for comments regarding the above request: • Portage Way is a rural local access road with a 20' driving surface with 1' gravel shoulders and a posted speed limit of 25 mph that serves a few residences and Lower Oak Bay Park. • The average annual daily traffic(AADT) is 50 trips per day. As with any other road, the count varies during the year. Due to Lower Oak Bay Park use, the count has been up to 344 trips a day during a summer weekend. • Portage Way has a 60' right of way within the plat of Irondale Acre Tracts and Hiller Waterfront Tracts to the south of the parcel and a 30' right of way within lrondale Acre Tracts on the east boundary of the parcel. • Portage Way is subject to damage due to winter high tides and wind. Emergency repairs in 1994, 1999 and 2006 due to storm damage included replacing the roadway base and surfacing and repairing the rip rap on the Oak Bay side of the road. The road location is constrained by Oak Bay to the southeast and should it need to be reconstructed, it would be inland toward the above referenced parcel. • Due to the horizontal alignment of the road at the southeast corner of the parcel, sight distance within the"sight triangle" needs to be maintained in order to provide safe stopping sight distance for motorists. No obstruction to sight distance should be allowed. The proposed location of the building envelope in the southeast portion of the parcel appears to propose an obstruction. • The address of 181 Portage Way was assigned at the original driveway location at mile post .18 left, approximately 80 feet north of the latest proposed location. This location provided adequate site distance and a change in location would require the address to be changed. Recycled Paper • The site distance for the approach location as shown on the site plan received October 1, 2007 is not adequate because of the proximity to the curve (intersection) and the proposed building envelope. • The driveway should be constructed in a way that vehicles pulling out of the approach do not back out on to the roadway. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. 0 r � T ' OCT ¶ s 1007 \ i\ JEFFER50N CQQNT_Y^ D ?T.Of COn�iu`�iTY DEVELP,r. �4SON ca JEFFERSON COUNTY w4 o6 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �� 1-D vd1-C 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 �`S'�IING'S Al Scalf, Director September 30, 2007 ROSEMARY REICH CHARLES LAW 820 E CADY RD, CONDO B306 EVERETT WA 98603 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 181 PORTAGE WAY CASE#: MLA05-00737 Dear ROSEMARY REICH: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. 1)Attached are the comments from Donna Frostholm, Jefferson County Staff Wetland Biologist. No other comments have been received regarding the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan. Please forward these comments to your wetland biologist for them to be addressed in an addendum to this report. If your biologist has questions, he/she may contact Donna Frostholm directly at 360-379-4466 or by e-mail at dfrostholm @co.jefferson.wa.us. 2) Thank you for staking the property lines and the building envelope. On Friday, September 28, 2007, Terry Duff from Jefferson County Public Works Dept., and I conducted a site inspection. The standard setback from the road right-of-way is 20 ft. The current site plan indicates a 5 ft. setback. Over the next couple of weeks Terry will be doing research regarding site distance and traffic statistics on Portage Way. When I receive her comments I will forward them to you. In the meantime, if you have any questions or concerns please contact me by e-mail at zlamp @co.jefferson.wa.us or by phone at 360-385-9406. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by December 29, 2007. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, ' artment of Comm 'sty Development Staff c: File AA n Wo( edu FRED P NASON Tanya�vy� Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 Page l of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:13 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Zoe: I have reviewed the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers (dated May 21, 2007)for Parcel 962700108. This report was submitted to the County on August 10, 2007 by the applicant, Fred Nason, who is requesting a SPAAD for a single-family house. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The plants proposed for installation are appropriate for the area as are the plant spacing, size, and quantities shown in Table 1 of the report. Planting specifications should be included in Appendix C. The report should identify if any soil amendments or mulch will be needed. Given the number of plants to be installed, the project biologist should be on-site just prior to plant installation to ensure the plants will be placed in the ground as per the plan and that the plants to be installed are healthy. 2. An as-built must be submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation. The as-built is used as a baseline for determining if the performance standards are met. 3. All monitoring should be conducted by the project biologist, and monitoring reports should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. 4. The conclusion section (page 11) makes reference to installing bird boxes. The location of the bird boxes should be shown on the plans. Any bird boxes proposed as part of the mitigation plan should be based on requirements for native birds (that have the potential to occur in the area) and bird box specifications should be included in the report. Bird box specifications are intended to decrease the likelihood that non- native species, such as starlings, will use the boxes. 5. Also in the conclusion section, the last bullet makes reference to cultivated species. All species planted in the reduced buffer must be native species. Non-native and/or landscaping varieties are not appropriate substitutions for planting within the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any question, Donna. 9/28/2007 X -1 O --1 (n -0 O< = OZD -0 OZ7 -_IK -0Z =i < I i I Dn cn ° I > m om c ° ° m z , ° rim ° co D y .-. rc m -< o m mcM 01 D (/) --I p -1D ib O i.♦ ° o �` �,���, m m —I I ,OZ,R. z �O��i Np _1 m o ,�„ �'Ty 20s o -I g �l ,�,� 3p �3, z j 00' C xi r m A Z D m r °° : `40.1 %T z ° D° o c ••ft 0 10,Aik AlkOppli‘ / -9 *r:44*014 0 I-9 • / / ' ' Nitr.4 C CI 41F- 0 11 / phi, ./ / / , /1,0„ // 400,11 / / // i 41,..„ 11ipvt , z v. m 1 1,0,4 _ , , // u) 1 1$, o Dm � cn ��I � I in -n Zm itir d X44 oz � ° '�Li" o2D ` o z o rzn o o , m(n z my 33p. 0 0 c) z7J IlikS,00 2p 00, m 00 6 ,9 00 D vm tn � 11/4- -Tr\ m m0 M qm F \ m 10 Ro o 0 m NT�c �1 z ° c � R 0�0z m CO > > m 1 ���•- § 0 ; DDS o- ZVI.Zi010OZ2z A F 9 ' rn m cK O*pi *10 000 - _ m x x0 A om �o� °m ��� y g (n Ui o rno - u 8T N T TO N (T N L21 TAli 11 i co O CO CO CO w �^' 26 L d �Nv tTi IND CO �U rt art � ;U TTn y O M T O --I (n 7 < rn N O OZ D �O � r 1 Co, = Z —1 <_ M S, I D 0O wpm o � c O00pm OOm > i�q m O0 CO C-9 s°t 1 01- -I � om -0 o cry r co = _ N > r. rc m mo �a�a o v m z m e ) c i = L.""d O -< -I-I m O CPI z O o Z I` `, m m Ai, �,� tioRTy ,D„ o m 0 �1 � , 30° 33" Z o CN g 1 00' C x r o zo ��� 00„ m D o z m C �_ �J�` ��ST �,�,` xi D 4IY' o z om■ N �' I ` � zD O m z p o z o \Air Ilk%TH ` 0 1 m (n mm --"06, 3�0. ` o 0 o < 0 •• 7 00 0 m I- O � � m 9 00,, = D m c_ = I I Cn CD �FST \ (=i) m mp c I > A'''Z') 1 m oN� \ Z O -< O O C 0 ZDK m rp o� u) p z o OD p 0 -1° 0 PI < m Z -<• L o c_..) IZ s a n O Z, '� 0- Nm UI-IO 000 Z m 1- s m 71 TI m O� Z`*71 `ZMO 000 o N 70 * f Zo 5000 OK �OO 0 o n � zom om zrm o A cc")) m 2 2 > C),1--I r m lnnZl 2 0 Cr)C E 2 C D 0 ON �Ti rq ;1 m 7:I E z rm m 0 O -I V 1331331)7D 20 � ?<2* Z -1 Fri O m O Z 33 -< M Z 0 x, O _ II Z m -< * _3 N °2E' prAox gM ow No V (c ' 0 2 my N gmN� zc Av I rn CN 0 ,,'goo iii;,,.. p7, o o' o N 0, N A Oe z pzpy� f pjpp sm 1/� 7C n n 0 0 O OZ�Z ZZ �< /, / .� o 2�� c0 N N N N -gym, (u/ `p 1 14 gi' 0 W N N f R~ w ( n m m m ."i .�i .�+ .art tDii n N I .0 N N In + rt Reich, Rosemary From: bob phillips [bphillips @jeffpud.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:19 AM To: bogboy47 @yahoo.com Subject: Portage Way property Mr. Law, Based on my review of our construction maps for the water system near Jefferson County Parcel # 962700108 on Portage Way Rd., here is the situation and some possible solutions to you acquiring water at this parcel: • 1. There is an existing 8 inch water main that follows Portage Way toward this parcel. Unfortunately, it turns and follows Hiller St. approximately 177 feet before it reaches the parcel. 2. Jefferson County Parks and Rec. has a water meter located at this intersection. There is a 2 inch water service line from this meter that continues down Portage Way Rd. adjacent to the parcel on the south and east sides. This line services the park facilities beyond the parcel. 3. Jefferson County owns this service line and it is located in their roadway. They do not, as a rule, allow privately owned service lines to be located in their roadways. Possible solutions: 1. Since Nason owns the parcel above this parcel, get an easement to run a service line along the property line east to the parcel(just inside the property boundary). We would connect into the 8 inch line before it turns down Hiller St. and install a meter near the meter for Jefferson County Parks and Rec. 2. You pay to install a water main extension down Portage Way approximately 177 feet. Your meter and the Parks and Rec. 2 inch line and meter would be place at this termination point, along with a blow off or fire hydrant. You would then quit claim the water main to PUD. 3. Talk to Parks and Rec. and get them to give PUD enough of the 2 inch water service line to allow moving of their meter and installing your meter next to it in front of this parcel. This would incur some costs from you for connecting, moving and installing. I can send you a map copy of out pipes, and the parcels, road, etc. if you give me an address or fax. Address would be better, since I could send something in color. Hope this helps or at least starts answering you questions. Bob Phillips 4/12/2007 Reich, Rosemary From: bob phillips [bphillips@jeffpud.org] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:30 PM To: Reich, Rosemary Subject: RE: Portage Way property Rosemary, I think costs are something you will have to investigate yourself. Meter install cost is $900.00. Road crossing to an existing water main is$700.00 (only if the water main is on the other side of the road from your property). System Development Charge is$2000.00(This is for existing tanks, water lines, licenses, wells and equipment already in place). Then there is the issue of how to get water to your property. Where there is no water main existing along a property line, the owner(developer) is responsible for extending the water main to serve the property. The proper solution would be for you to hire a contractor(after getting a cost estimate), work with PUD to design the physical equipment and provide engineered drawing (no cost to you ) and oversee installation and connection to existing PUD facilities (inspect and test) and then quit claim everything to PUD via legal documents drawn up by the PUD. This could be a 2 inch water main extension, since it will serve only you. Other options would be complicated and may result in no cooperation from Nason or Jefferson County. Hope this helps. Bob Phillips Original Message From: Reich, Rosemary [mailto:rosemary.reich @boeing.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 7:27 AM To: bob phillips Subject: RE: Portage Way property Hi Bob, I am the other half purchasing the Nason property and I have a question. Which of the solutions that you offered us to get water to our prospective property would be the most cost effective? Thanks Rosemary Reich Office Administrator for Sean R. Sullivan, Senior Manager, 787 Cabin Systems & EME Recognition Focal rosemary.reich @ boeinq.com (425) 342-8454 40-88.1, 1C4-1, 03-CM From: bob phillips [mailto:bphillips @jeffpud.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:19 AM To: bogboy47 @yahoo.com Subject: Portage Way property Mr. Law, Based on my review of our construction maps for the water system near Jefferson County Parcel # 962700108 on Portage Way Rd., here is the situation and some possible solutions to you acquiring water at this parcel: 4/1 3/2007 1. There is an existing 8 inch water main that follows Portage Way toward this parcel. Unfortunately, it turns and follows Hiller St. approximately 177 feet before it reaches the parcel. 2. Jefferson County Parks and Rec. has a water meter located at this intersection. There is a 2 inch water service line from this meter that continues down Portage Way Rd. adjacent to the parcel on the south and east sides. This line services the park facilities beyond the parcel. 3. Jefferson County owns this service line and it is located in their roadway. They do not, as a rule, allow privately owned service lines to be located in their roadways. Possible solutions: 1. Since Nason owns the parcel above this parcel, get an easement to run a service line along the property line east to the parcel(just inside the property boundary). We would connect into the 8 inch line before it turns down Hiller St. and install a meter near the meter for Jefferson County Parks and Rec. 2. You pay to install a water main extension down Portage Way approximately 177 feet. Your meter and the Parks and Rec. 2 inch line and meter would be place at this termination point, along with a blow off or fire hydrant. You would then quit claim the water main to PUD. 3. Talk to Parks and Rec. and get them to give PUD enough of the 2 inch water service line to allow moving of their meter and installing your meter next to it in front of this parcel. This would incur some costs from you for connecting, moving and installing. I can send you a map copy of out pipes, and the parcels, road, etc. if you give me an address or fax. Address would be better, since I could send something in color. Hope this helps or at least starts answering you questions. Bob Phillips 4/13/2007 . Jefferson County Department of Community Development a 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend WA 98368, (360)379-4450 SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER FRED &JUDY NASON Awy I Li MAILING ADDRESS 61 PORTAGE WAY d ," PORT HADLOCK.WASHINGTON, 98331 I q i, i3 AUG 1 0 2001 �'" PHONE 360-385-1116 , SYSTEM DESIGNER TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC. ( . r nc`r, rls7;' -- 77 t ! ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 7 Township 29N Range 1E*- PARCE{`#``•'h T 0F'•862-Y00'108 Subdivision Name NASON SHORT PLAT Division Block Lot(s) 2 SITE LOCATION 61 PORTAGE WAY Zip Code 98339 SOURCE OF SEWAGE: Residential X Residential ADU Commercial Community TYPE OF WORK: New X Redesign Upgrade Repair Partial (tank) (drainfield) Expansion Designate Reserve Area Conventional Alternative X Module Length 19 ft. Module Width 20 ft. Number of Gallons/day 240 GPD Trench/Bed Depth N/A in. Number of Modules 3 Site Size AC Septic Tank size 1000 gal. Pump Chamber size 1500 gal. Water Source: private_ public X Soil type 4 (ATTACH SOIL EVAL.) Previous eval: yes / no NASON S.P Application Rate 0.60 gal./sq.ft./day TYPE OF SYSTEM GLENDON BIOFILTER By signing the application form, the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and it's employees, representatives or agents for the purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property or structure shall be requested and shall occur during regular business hours. Appeal - A person aggrieved of a decision of the Health Officer may appeal. Appeals shall be submitted to the Health Division in writing within fifteen days after receiving written notice of the decision. DISCLAIMER-This application is for an on-site sewage system that meets the state and county standards in effect on the date of application. This application for an onsite sewage system DOES NOT assure you of any other County approvals. For example, it DOES NOT GUARANTEE that you will later obtain permission to build a permanent residence or other structure on this parcel. Any future application will be separately judged by the rules and law in effect at that time. . ((f (P ) Ofid6 2 /i/o 2 9 Owner Signature Date / FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PARTIAL ASBUILT FINAL APPROVED PRESS/TEST PUD Fire District Planning District School District Zone Date Fee Rec# Check# Case#SEP P:\Nason(06004)\Design\FN LOT 2 Septic Application.doc 7/01 ,, i4 li,sz.L "' SEPTIC SYSTEM GENERAL NOTES AND CALCULATIONS FRED & JUDY NASON GLENDON BIOFILTER SYSTEM NASON SHORT PLAT LOT 2 PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 ,eeftr*4441/4117, -. : '4 r . V:6.is-re - i' k4t4v ,.• :-Qas1;..-(' , ie, 1 k U AUG 1 0 2007 ' D:PtR_F!. 61_Wfilla 1 ' 1, 1 /31.7 JEFFERSON COUNTY 1 nc9T oF CMIWIITY PFVEtOPMFNT PREPARED BY: TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC. P.O. BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 (360) 379-9661 PREPARED: July 31, 2007 7/31/07 NASON;962-700-108 % Page 1 GLENDON BIOFILTER '"` SYSTEM SIZING: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 2 BDRMS DESIGN FLOW PER BEDROOM 120 GPD DAILY DESIGN FLOW 240 GPD NATIVE SOIL TYPE 4 NATIVE SOIL APPLICATION RATE 0.6 GPD/SF MODULE BASIN CONFIGURATION NUMBER OF MODULES 2 INTERIOR MODULE BASIN WIDTH(INTERIOR DIMENSION) 5.5 FT INTERIORMODULE BASIN LENGTH(INTERIOR DIMENSION) 9.5 FT INTERIOR MODULE BASIN DEPTH(INTERIOR DIMENSION) 5.5 FT MODULE BASIN CAPACITY PROVIDED 287.0 CF CHECK MINIMUM MODULE BASIN CAPACITY(2.2 CF FOR EACH 1 GPD) 264.0 CF MODULE RIM LENGTH PROVIDED(INTERIOR DIMENSIONS) 30.0 FT CHECK MINIMUM MODULE RIM LENGTH(1 FT FOR EACH 4 GPD) 30.0 FT MODULE ABSORPTION AREA CONFIGURATION (MEASUREMENTS ARE BASED ON GLENDON DESIGN GUIDELINES) NATIVE SLOPE 4.0 PERCENT UPSLOPE ABSORPTION AREA WIDTH(CONTROLLED BY 1.5:1 FILL SLOPE) 4.5 FT DOWNSLOPE ABSORPTION AREA WIDTH(CONTROLLED BY INFILTRATIVE AREA) 4.5 FT OVERALL ABSORPTION AREA WIDTH 15.0 FT SIDESLOPE ABSORPTION AREA LENGTH(CONTROLLED BY INFILTRATIVE AREA) 5.0 FT OVERALL ABSORPTION AREA LENGTH 20.0 FT MODULE ABSORPTION AREA PROVIDED(ALLOWING FOR 6"BASIN OVEREXCAVATION) 240.0 SF MODULE ABSORPTION AREA REQUIRED 200.0 SF ACTUAL SOIL APPLICATION RATE 0.5 GPD/SF MODULE DOWNSLOPE RESERVE AREA CONFIGURATION RESERVE ABSORPTION AREA LENGTH 25.0 FT RESERVE ABSORPTION AREA WIDTH 20.0 FT RESERVE ABSORPTION AREA PROVIDED 260.0 SF RESERVE ABSORPTION AREA REQUIRED 200.0 SF r,� t L . u 3 ' hi 1WLl. AUG 1 0 2001 Tillman Engineering, Inc. v C GENERAL NOTES: PROJECT CONTACTS: A. Owner: Fred&Judy Nason it 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock,Washington,98339 'PHONE 360-385-1116 B. Engineer: Tillman Engineering,Inc. PO Box 1375 Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Ryan Tillman,P.E. (360)379-9661 . C. Jefferson County PUD No. 1: Jim Parker,Manager Jerry Govia,Contracts (360)385-5800 D. Jefferson County Health Department 615 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)385-9444 E. Glendon Specifications: Glendon Biofilter Technologies,Inc. „ r._ ,� \,. F 25448 Port Gamble Rd. ' ` Poulsbo,WA 98370 1 -) (360)297-7066 1 , 'I.: AUG 1 0 2007 ;3.,, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I_ gcniV (.fIF f Section 7,Township 29N,Range 1E,W.M.,Parcel Number 962-700-108 ._ ” 1.-. .) i'", 0,AT'` ` Nason Short Plat,Lot 2 SPECIFICATIONS: All work shall be in accordance with the Washington State Department of Health publication "On-Site System Regulations", WAC 246-272,all applicable rules and regulations set forth by Jefferson County and its Health Department, and the plans. All materials, workmanship, design, and construction of the septic tank shall conform to the drawings,specifications,and the Uniform Building Code(Latest Edition). Work shall be performed in a professional, workmanlike manner by persons skilled in the construction of alternative on-site sewage disposal systems. The contractor shall be responsible for all safety precautions and the methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures required to perform his work including shoring for excavations,etc.. The contractor shall notify the Engineer immediately of discrepancies, errors, and omissions in the plans. Construction shall not continue until any problem is resolved. The contractor is responsible for noting all changes on the as-built plans. The contractor is responsible for returning corrected as-builts to the engineer within 30 days after completion of construction. As-builts shall accurately locate beds, pump and septic tanks including inlets and outlets,hatches,risers,etc.,to within 6 inches of actual location. Nason,Fred&Judy APN 962-700-108 Lot 2 Nason Short Plat July 31,2007 Page 1 1I! 4,' AUG 10 2007 4:., GLENDON SYSTEM NOTES: A. The biofilter modules are to be constructed using the standard 6' x 10' x 5'-deep basin manufactured by Fred Hill, Inc. Also to be used is the 'Glendon Kit', including the internal piping for the M31 biofilter,the splitter,and the control panel. B. The site is to be prepared and the system installed during dry weather and soil 23onditions. The installer shall not exceed the specified plow depth unless approved in writing by the County and the Engineer. 4 C. If during the course of system construction, soil conditions are found that may lead to premature failure of the system, construction shall be suspended immediately and the installer shall notify the engineer. Such soil conditions include ground water, fill, soil with high clay content, bedrock, or excessively permeable gravel. D. The excavation for the biofilter basin is to be no larger than six inches wider than the basin on all sides. E. The biofilter shall be installed from the up-slope side. The thirty foot downslope protection area shall be protected from vehicular traffic and all other sources of disturbance. F. The biofilter rim shall be inspected by the Engineer and shall not exceed'h"+/-from level. G. All exposed soil and filter media shall be seeded with grass and covered with jute mat, then covered with two inches or more of hay prior to final inspection. H. The installation procedure shall be as outlined in the Design and Installation Manual for Glendon Biof lters,published by Glendon Biofilter Technologies,Inc. MATERIALS AND SUBMITTALS: Materials shall conform to the following specifications. All submittals are to be made to the Engineer seven days prior to beginning construction. A. Building Sewer: PVC ASTM D3034,SDR 35 B. Curtain Drain: N/A C. Transport Lines: PVC ASTM D2241, SDR 26 Cl 160 or Cl 200 IPS. Minimum burial depth for transport lines shall be 18 inches. D. Filter Media: As specified by Glendon Biofilter Technologies,Inc. E. Septic Tank: ASTM C478 precast two-compartment tank, with a minimum capacity as shown on the plan. Provide with inlet and outlet baffles and Zabel A1800 (or equivalent) outlet effluent screen. Provide riser to grade over screen to access for maintenance and inspections. Tanks shall be installed such that the lid joint is a minimum 1-foot above the 100-year flood elevation and a minimum of six inches above native grade. Tanks Nason,Fred&Judy APN 962-700-108 Lot 2 Nason Short Plat July 31,2007 Page 2 ;O. j}�( jr shall be placed on a minimum of 4"of sand bedding. All tanks shall be free of leaks and leak tested if deemed necessary. F. Pump Tank: ASTM C478 precast concrete tank, with a minimum capacity as shown on the plan, and configured to accept pumps and related equipment. Tank shall be of monopour construction. Asphaltic ennlsion coating is not required. Tanks shall be installed such that the lid joint is six inches above native grade. Tanks shall be placed on a minimum of 4"of sand bedding. All tanks shall be free of leaks and leak tested if deemed necessary. Tanks shall be installed such that the lid joint is a minimum 1-foot above the 100-year flood elevation and a minimum of six inches above native grade. G. Sewage Pump: Beckett or Myers pump as specified by Glendon Biofilter Technologies. H. Electrical Controls: Verify electrical requirements for splicing, ventilation, etc. with local electrical inspector prior to ordering parts and installation. Components shall be mounted in a NEMA 4X rated weather tight enclosure that meets NEC code standards and the requirements of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I), and be listed by Underwriters Laboratories. , { The panel is to be as specified by Glendon Biofilter Technologies, Inc. f's` i't and shall contain the following features: ;! U AUG 1 0 2007 L,- . 1. Dose counter and pump run time meter. 2. Audible and visual high water alarm. Alarm circuit shall be (IF ` ` ' °- wired separately from the pump circuit. 3. Dose counter and pump run time meter. Discharge assembly shall contain check and ball valves and union to facilitate removal of the pump unit from the pump tank. Flexible coupling shall be required where recommended by the manufacturer to negate torque effects. Location of the pump controls shall be as approved by the owner. I. Septic Tank Riser: Concrete riser rings or leveling brick together with locking ring and cover or fiberglass lid may be an acceptable alternate (Engineer approval required)to the'Orenco'riser and bolt down lid. Provide 24" diameter access risers to grade over the inlet and outlet of septic tank. Water and gas tight seals are required. J. Pump Tank Riser: Concrete riser rings or leveling brick together with locking ring and cover or fiberglass lid may be an acceptable alternate (Engineer approval required) to the 'Orenco' riser and bolt down lid specified in the details. Riser lids shall be 24" diameter and vented to prevent buildup of explosive gases in the pumping chamber. Splice box Nason,Fred&Judy APN 962-700-108 Lot 2 Nason Short Plat July 31,2007 Page 3 suitable to the L&I shall be attached firmly to the riser for connection of the pumps and control leads. OTHER UTILITIES: In addition to utilities shown on the plans, other utilities may exist on site. Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to utilities,whether shown or not. Call before you dig 1-800-424-5555. a INSPECTIONS: The contractor shall notify the Owner and Engineer two days prior to the following required inspections. Notify Jefferson County Health Department two days prior to pump test. 1. After clearing and prior to surface plow. 2. Following basin placement and surface plow. 3. For pressure test. 4. For final inspection at project completion. Quality control is the responsibility of the contractor. Inspections by the Engineer or the Health Department do not relieve the contractor from ensuring conformity to the plans and their intent. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: The operation and maintenance of the system will be an ongoing function of the owner. System principals and maintenance procedures are outlined in the "Users Manual" provided with the project. It is the contractor's responsibility to leave concise operating instructions for the individual system for the owner, including but not limited to the following on all equipment: 1. Warranties 2. Specification Sheets. 3. Installation instructions and deviations therefrom with justifications for such deviations. 4. Operations and Maintenance manuals. The system is not designed to be used with a garbage disposal. Add no septic tank additives to the system. MONITORING: Alternative on site sewage disposal systems are required to be monitored during their lifetimes for the Washington State Department of Health. Jefferson County PUD No. 1 is the designated monitoring entity. The owner will be required to enter a monitoring agreement with the PUD prior to final approval of septic system AUG 1 0 2007 � Pn�� e MINTY lfpP r . r Nason,Fred&Judy APN 962-700-108 Lot 2 Nason Short Plat July 31,2007 Page 4 1 w N - 1 . 1 oa -0 m - oDo -Ic o0 z � y o f) G) a 0 Corn � rn - ° m °c 00 m m m zm r y I co cn0D mm 0 z 2ti vI A -12 r(I (rrr1CC � 1 � �7 m A try A z a 00 -{ Co(1) O I -IN2z m �O r- y -C an, ^i m ,,, ® O O I _G m p O z y ' Z r 2 r g z Q ' z to -'l i1 a m - 2 •0 ° -�i m (1) Z o to X00 0U) WT 2Ga) r'1 y ° D � y C or � m ,noa mm 01 2 cmi) M � � -- ° i' zmr- oZ �' � m 0 � Z o a c) Co CO Z ° -+ a 2 --mc)zoc - 0 1 0 0., 0 o o a o z xm n N ' m I- 0 �' Arno o0 e D A om D o y z r ,.*-i -, o avZ1 ; "1 M y ae" � z r, a Q o Z = A � __� D T � z0 m o 0 OD r2o r- 0 G) ti -< m S o A ° E +o �o o cc z z 2 0 ti J oy nc) g c � a2 o �- a ry o � AZ � A v z - z < ? � o N �D rZ < r2 c -0 "i 7 -I z 2 1 2 Zz N 210 + a z � o zm i c v � o o (n co 0EO � Oz 2 yzyC OD a n o °cry20 0) c rn -11 0 2 Z 2 � r D � 2p2 8 v z p Z _ z O g ° z � � 8 z z z O Q m ° oa2 �' 2 0 N Q Q Z) 0 01 C Z 2 rn A m ri r z z O /1/� mDao o m = a �� 2 0 � r :.-4 o m m (0 - � z m m0 !I Ili) 1 . � m ■ f 0 C) 0 2 mom 11A/04. ,, i:...11101 ^ Pt"' (A S. 11,1 u.e. P `^ P_ ii0.01 14 F.0 g- -t) > Vfi 4... / rilli g, . 0 t o \--4 l '_.:::° il �� "" �m 'n 1 yl _ --_,.... .. I 1540,-- -4'. 13r 1' - ‘,. /'",- in >< 0 4:_ Z i O_ n 4 R P R \tz3;6: ru TAr 'pt_ r Z u I t -----' -----_7\ ....s, . Z n dif \ 1 C N ... y A W N 11 O J 0 0 OFF ` 1 ,\IN Z 0 N,::, Oa • REVISIONS DATE BY ■ i 1 / W R1 FRED & JUDY NASON 'rILLmRN q J $ SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN VICINITY MAP AND LEGEND ENGINEERING, INC. 0 N .4 141 DlUq 4VP115Th 1 i 1 \ PARCEL NO. 962-700-008 A1,».n''/ \ / r ) ) 0 J, . C... ..-. - - --- , -..„..... A ) . • MOM Ifin■-- t 1 • 1" N -N I N. — oi.t.. L . x ...3.. rn II! NI.11 1 1 • < z z I rn p /I tz, 0 0 4 lkillis• ••••••1rOTITI. ___, ip,,,,, ,c.).....• ...... pori'le" , 1 ......,., 1 . ....„, Cli) "i d--- 1 1-- -- v..v. . 0 I I _ .._,......._. ,...) . , -...... r., ;<:.2:,,1 • . . 0, _1. t•O 8 5-1,-7. ,...s,,,..,••• ,--- . . —I 14401) Vcl,,'--I !IVO' • 7..../ 'c'0' (r‘ • sz.'t---.. ---k 67 ili■ 1 1 : C. • c g 1 0 f EVISIONS FRED & JUDY NASON TILLITIRN P. R DATE Erf \ g N3 SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN OVERALL SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. cm 1 S i 1 PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 a.c...i z.s=z, 710-719-01111.X0.421-0130 IIR .../ \... -1 U) 1 U) r- 1 n1 U) r- 1 0 N ® r n — ---- U) r- 1 tir /////�/ •• • \ �. . _ r. ..ti; I 7 ' -' ' . 0 w _ 1 N e. NNN Ic...ir 4., , . •,211 /,,,i N \ ,. O \ \\ \ �\ \ '\\ 1' ,I \ \ r. C r ' \ \ c_,n 0 o \ R . P ?i m o n m A 1' 1 c m cnm mo rno n m m m � cn i oz nmz c� o °-*I rri 0 0 m �g x �o°z �N / D a r —1 O�� O mA ,=12 o 12 's 00 CEO 0� 2� z A v)r- 0 Op z o� 4 ZO r r ^ n m m I m 0m ° A o -II- �rn(4 � -0 qm 0 v AQ _� o � — R . o o o o `, o -i Q * Sc m ,m I . . m- - ,,,sy _ TA 'r,L' 2 n T �. o =' cm y � om o n • z 2 a r o wz a . �1E ` o N, . :� O m r N.1_ 0 - o 7 0 'z II r p +, A 0 0 0 Ns/ REHSIONS DATE BY "‘g r a R /\ FRED & JUDY NASON TILLMAN Q w SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN DRAINFIELD AREA SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. o Ij\ PARCEL NO 962-700-108 310,.,.. .RO J �.-- \' • °o _ -,a C)i!J; 0-i -1 A�Naaz \ y'' • a�{°r- z or°'�Ar- -00 - °• _Pi_ �! O02 --I yrzo z90o1 ��gm• m rn o - ° � Sx y,1 vx z mm Eq�� mmocc, m I a �2 ° Z mw z -+ p2 vr 2 Q • <qm ' l3g-1i ", � --1 > mxn Ir-S°r bA 2civ8rn m �v )><S m y p Oz> CnS A xO� .. ° A ro m m 9211- 1 '‹ c)--1 li 2 °0�-120 o °zzn oo�o� x a �n m°z c 2°o: ' SOS r0 r -C Ao • . `\\\ rn_�mTA A _ A . A I`t�. • m0 we 2ootmif°�� NmVmitnZ � O 00°a~ .. �Aym � �� �°z ��cn�-am0 ° OCaO� 0Z0K .."`I--11..r. 22 va�v J _ S~ ~ O O • / • _ x nj p 0 En p p m n a cnvi -1 w A ° cnA° cn Ino O r n0 � ° cW or*1 '� rrimz m, m°0 rm�1$ c C 2 (�A2 cry -1 2r�7 �I m0 A OD n cn I p �n0 �A Ay 2 O O y r� q2 p2 ry nr nr O ^�(n mam ° A �9 O LI R fnz (7Z y 2 O °A 2 o c gA n ZIn < ° m - . m m ° o = r m M I 4. AO a � -h � w N ~ [*I �v n1 en °< O n r0 O CD rrr° O -1 A °c n� � , r OA ti n � �' ~O n n z g m, -i m D m m yr zO 'i b O p w -i 2 � 0 rm A z �� oov a � r m • , S A m -07 y m tr p C 00 26-1 .-- 0 10 g c� TF -1-- •. r, n m m g z •a 1 E REVISIONS DATE B/ I r TILLMAN FRED & JUDY NASON c, SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN BUILDING SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. J ` PARCEL N0. 962-700-108 •310:0471-030 IV I i / \ 1 2 x A 2 ZS 2 v o A 0 z §1~ 4 o 0 ;7,, , A • rJ A Ny9, o N D c% 0 o (• : ^: 0 5 Z Cr) 0 '� I W g M 2 N o • c ` ■■- yz • - p °2 0 r_ II � C 1 p y I-12 8 . i -� rn _ 2 r rl 2 .:.r.., _ - r l I t r ir�W Z m ' 2 .t rI .'.. I�p.I.O-I% I 2 o ; m ¶11 zo 'II IINIIIMII i"11 r.r ) Z vg 1--- p"1 2p p0 Z --'4" 0In ' F- r~•1M O p 2 n) u) 1.. 2 9' 2 h7 cl m HU N v1$ L t :op, 03 z Igo by 0 6O r 0 ° m 2 a n O O >yo m 00 OH x c� 0m 'bm m v 0 0 b °oO"0 rrn 0 " r) A p z x g wpb a v z o i dim r r--1) o �pA c • =;z r O O y 0 p, r n CID 0 2� ...y r- _ f'rY.ij. m Q ■"i ITI n I ��q CO 0 G.,, C)< rn 0 r. C 4 r, p 7.T � 2'r -,.........4 ce a "''\ —� _.__ tq ` g, �I w '',c"-1`0° S^ 1. }lr / REVISIONS OATS EN N. / a N / FRED & JUDY NASON TILLmRN , a a) SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN PUMP CHAMBER DETAIL ENGINEERING, INC. ""n^°E5s°�Nw"sma r I�r Mtn r'mmi j \ PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 }0-371-91111,310-311-01..3=NI1 \ i itosON c O JEFFERSON COUNTY • l ' \" DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '' -=, .i'..> `� 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 L ',. ', AUG�� 2007 t ice , 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax p www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment JEFF•ugn, l' �tilY iS$INO' CEPT, Dr oOi•!i4it!,,i 1)tvLLLr.�IE��I , Master Permit Application MLA: (rL os - 73 7 Project Description(indude separate sheets as necessary): Tax Parcel Property Number: 94, 2, 700 in g Size: - 7,8 (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 5./2/49 4_4' F'df 5/il c �4-7-r/ty teesiveweE. Property Owner(s)of Record: lr Eel P. A/a s d n Telephone;*. .3e5 /1/G. Fax: email: Mailing Address: _ _ a ■ ... ���.0 � ' 8 3 3 - Applicant/Agent(if different from o 'ner): i. arrifF771� ca r '.5 - - Telephone: 'SS - 8 GG Fax: email: Mailing Address: D Ae4 /..l. . ..•. >. C _ Vc re i ./ ?8 D What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Conditional Use[C(a). C(d), or C]** ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Commercial* ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Change of Use ❑Short Plat** ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach ❑Binding Site Plan** ❑ Home Business ❑Cottagelndustry ❑Long Plat** ❑ Propane ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑ Sign ❑Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** ❑ Stormwater Management ❑Shoreline Management Substantial Development** Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Temporary Use ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Tree Vegetaion Request *May require a Pre–Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: j �� DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate I i 1, W C I_,a to a as my agent in matters relating to this .ppli . ion for permit(s). r OWNER SIGNATURE / t 1 /�)4 A ) 2 Date: d 21 Z By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later Inspections. Staffs access and right of- try will be assumed unless the applicant informs the Co my in writing at the time of the application tha/he < she waits prior notice. — Signature: / .. A / + ( tt) ? n� Date: 5 _ a• The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he, he or it holds individual and non-tr ns abl sp sibility f adhering to and complying witCF )e ES The Applicant has read this disclaimer a d signs nd dates it below. Signature: , Peli T• ' / nib/ Date: D S .? 1 0 7 C:\llocuments and Settings\carat\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK86\Master Permit Application 12-19-2006.doc m 0 70 rn m < _ o ° D co ° z ° op -0 m -< 0 Z Jm � 0 � * cn -OG '-1 cDi> O z kItt , VS**, ° � m m �,���� C) ,,,,, �pRTy 2ps o m Fri ,,,,� 30° 0 `33 r H o U, 0' J r o `��`R�\ Op" Fq m F o zo ° D H ,� ST V•k**4 / x D ,�, 0 m H m 0 J o O o Z , m •., 0 I 4.•■■le.14 I 1 40111 AIN 11. blr..-01106- ■IriOfrt 1 I 1 ''�'� �44 13 I- 7,7 -i 411111iii OZ � O o Z /� Z V) Z 0 ` S006, 0 4 0 cmn z z v .DO' 33p° 0 0 m 0 • ,9, Op n -Ti-ti 0 0 Op -m 13 n m cn cn BEST \ cn m M mm F \ K ml 07 Ro NTHn 1 Z 0 c /Y0 o z Zit 0 0 Xl m calmc .116. Z � o; zvnr co-co ozx z T ;Z] Z I O C BOO 0 �, n `� ' rF 1 T c 3. Kz W z,3 7 N- 7, ■r- N , f 0 m p mg II c G Z g t/q`� /r z ?z m _< * 4 ii g4�5 2 §i o o .'� Q7 \ L G m ' i a 4 ` = .4 CJ -1 N U N $2 7 '> z CC? \ p , o W z �1 y r�r a M .0 a g (c w ` j1 w m n . rt 339373 l.R'Vol(o�154 f.t . .`'6 /5y z-ra� fPMaNDFt� ONDALI AC TRACTS IRONDALee RBA&TY CO awe,1.4..4. ��_ !e./ i6!# 4 -3- 4 �..,. 3,o I ., 4,{yk �L,any This w4 or 4•44set.4cee re.4/eear.e.eaw s.e �5.� + 3.NF*ell cf lie NdMeserpr msea of A',3" .•a1 �' a' �' east fre'�ee-veto.oz.;7.tip e5. of Rarye i s I 0 /..w>;of Me u3ranefrt/73.e.,,•e•v y//,•.=f�,. CI i —— • p0 /✓e a5.... ,c4 nx nwMe..r eene,ot..ws.rn.rn/iar f OW 6V tk NeAk+saf q.. .e&c.:bM ar,40.w-C '::.o �� 11� �mO� ®i� eoeA.- ...34 f�5.i Nr nee cnrs of Me A6-647.707 ::;2 Rsl q...,5.e/se.JSec/e..eTe.wf<u-of M..ee s....s '� <.1f� Mere Eon'...he!MAwee RG-M�h54/° . 11111 .3 ? P°°,9.f M' Agee,a/ veranef blJ/aM P no 3..6.•1733437/4. h Q (94/4/Emf of 4'4 IH//ame,*,444.4 ,•edd/N Ms •-. 'E, N977/e./fd Ne AWee.1 pw.sw of,jedsn/s,Tc,4,4 o 3. ., re 29 NuAS'.e Ke.s,.i Mese of Me-e/✓b nee Me../wn. JI / A a• ee e M,d mfie..yf.of Ms ebF©rml.✓Mh aber \ FeerlyeIreSer r ptlee ie,d.pA 35.34/4'444/14.4334 roM, • ,a Of e• e,.43.43..eee n6..,Au....e.0, ,N4.a/e.ro.e 40.1,40 S ,u...m ". :.5..w..,,wee 5...r sPe-w •;1 es.}•a,.Mon 4,,..Pi.a Me.otNrAL./p•^a;5.1.0./aa •• e, .sa'.vw nom,.vsslRW ar...r.r .w l> •y- .ef-.1,44../.24,3443/cp.-nd°+ Ell .. 1 ROW,.of✓elRram CwNY.�•`"9Ne. !)/J Fer,lkrHwa../ 7 �«/ Jrtnr.r .r/iFr^ • ACNNOWLEL/6MENT saro w rw....y..O•1 e r� •e !! . 4- G...).er.6ep 1 R. Ma/0004 a/Oev.S..AP/Y/a. ] �w CA.i+..•Md40u/9 C°`rrM^ 40444 ne P°"^5.i/J49a.TlEPJamr+..e+JO..idWMi43,443.+e i ^ ro.n lac Earl.••f,,.xdmfe,.aSove4wy MS'�i'•f/43 c...4. `yi , ,• .. 4 4 75.,d..m.we 54.ATM.,,me....r....s,n y gc4o..4.t:.e r....4/4.44.4,43 �i 14 loll 14 C5..>x.eosa /.•.410 4ea,"3�47 re/77,77'34-40 of.wd.r4.410 M OE...Leo..e -LlJ Ce • ,rr..a,nv,..M.✓.o1 a ..r,..,/..re Ake ere me..04,'4ee A.•4 .� c't' YN8 w..ar✓°n•'m/=r '�•'. . :a e• sr .�„ "-iee Jb Mard�t/y Ltgy wellstf, °r1O1e me MM Me aea/ ,.T r�! a ek,n'4°°-e L dAet,.Rigs .led ce f,w .. f! E Life,nt�a of✓W trm coolly. /4.44,44,4, elf/.we/4.4,334.3•33•3344343f.nd Fir.'47'e.; ` .. t /✓° 39(m. ree day wN/rw/F rht*54'•3:4/.414334••h 3 R 44.4y RM... .we Ae NM ea � P ,44.134 nse.rxe Appa•e M. dry of C.urnA 6-44,434,9a4/a1 - 1 Ce.»yC:rs1arsz . ,-79....., M. e0dy o/,ce.e4.A0 qp CL .rll•.e Cory referee •. „ •. '* foal+.'-)6'/690 ° I M 4-433.44-4.3341.4. � fi lS /.r Me.1.40 43 4/4.44.-4,. 03.33-34,44 r Mt/2.4 It .. day of( 3'...-4 l, /9ro e5. ,/ .R i c Fa �/I-- Cowry nzw- ee 3 4 M Cl •. .i n Z. AO i JEFFERSON COUNTY _g�, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4■o A $ 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 `gSmNGZ Al Scalf, Director August 31, 2007 //��� , '�1� Dear Revi r, 1 �"" V5 RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within 2e. ; calendar days or by September,27, 2007. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact Z LAMP at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Adv Zo Lamp C: Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY cb 74ifr 44%, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT W 621 Sheridan Street 4 9S (5 Port Townsend, WA 98368 NOmber 12, 2007 Al Scalf, Director ROSEMARY REICH CHARLES LAW 820 E CADY RD, CONDO B306 EVERETT WA 98603 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 181 PORTAGE WAY CASE#: MLA05-00737 Dear ROSEMARY REICH: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project 1) Please submit a revised site plan that shows the following: a. A setbacrfrom the "Frontage Road" right-of-way. The standard setback is 20 ft. however this can be reduced administratively. b. The septic effluent transport lines on the subject parcel (out of the road right-of-way) 2) Please stake the building envelope and, the property lines along the road rights-of-way (Portage Way and "Frontage Road"). Contact me when this is completed so Terry Duff (Public Works Department)and I can make a site inspection. Comments have not been received from the agencies on the habitat management plan. Comments are due the end of business on September 27, 2007. I will contact you on September 28th with any comments that have been received. Donna Frostholm, staff wetland biologist, and I may make a site inspection to review the septic location on the upper parcel (962-700-108) in the morning of September 20, 2007. Please let me know if you would like to meet us there. If you have any questions, please contact me at (360)385-9406 or by e-mail at ziamp@co.jefferson.wa.us. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by December 11, 2007. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to II submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety(90)calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, f Fartment of Community development Staff c: File Nankcq tnle 'er,de.n FRED P NASON `-ro-niasi—Ro4Pr- Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' A ti - 1-C 621 Sheridan Street 1SNGp Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director August 31, 2007 D(lrosk.. Dear Rev. r, RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within ze ; calendar days or by September27, 2007. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment Please contact Z LAMP at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Aroma Zinn Lamp C: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY ".f4�gSON %, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ti • �a c ��p� Port S' 621 Sheridan Street t Townsend, WA 98368 F�NG (p,7 Al Scalf, Director August 31, 2007 Dear Rev}e‘r, ` RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination for Single-Family Residential Development Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within 2 ; calendar days or by September,2j, 2007. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment Please contact Z LAMP at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, AILA IM _ / nLamp c: , Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:13 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: MLA05-00737/Mitigation Plan Zoe: I have reviewed the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan prepared by GeoEngineers (dated May 21, 2007)for Parcel 962700108. This report was submitted to the County on August 10, 2007 by the applicant, Fred Nason, who is requesting a SPAAD for a single-family house. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The plants proposed for installation are appropriate for the area as are the plant spacing, size, and quantities shown in Table 1 of the report. Planting specifications should be included in Appendix C. The report should identify if any soil amendments or mulch will be needed. Given the number of plants to be installed, the project biologist should be on-site just prior to plant installation to ensure the plants will be placed in the ground as per the plan and that the plants to be installed are healthy. 2. An as-built must be submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation. The as-built is used as a baseline for determining if the performance standards are met. 3. All monitoring should be conducted by the project biologist, and monitoring reports should be submitted to the County by October 31 of each monitoring year. 4. The conclusion section (page 11) makes reference to installing bird boxes. The location of the bird boxes should be shown on the plans. Any bird boxes proposed as part of the mitigation plan should be based on requirements for native birds (that have the potential to occur in the area) and bird box specifications should be included in the report. Bird box specifications are intended to decrease the likelihood that non- native species, such as starlings, will use the boxes. P 9 , 5. Also in the conclusion section, the last bullet makes reference to cultivated species. All species planted in the reduced buffer must be native species. Non-native and/or landscaping varieties are not appropriate substitutions for planting within the reduced buffer. Let me know if you have any question, Donna. 9/24/2007 www.pse.com PSE PUGET SOUND ENERGY Puget Sound Energy, In . 3130 South 38th Street Tacoma, WA 98409 4/25/07 Charles Law 820 E. Cady Rd Condo B 306 Everett,Wa 98203 Phone: 858-626-8332 Fax: 858-625-8632 Re: Parcel # 962700108 181 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Wa 98339 To Whom It May Concern, Puget Sound Energy(PSE)will provide new electric to the site noted above according to the terms and conditions of Electric Rate Schedule 85 "Line Extensions"on file with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. An application for Service can be obtained by dialing 1-888-321-7779. Thank You, Ocke/v %vt1 Al McKiernan Engineering Specialist Customer Construction Services 253-476-6346 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ;; �? 615 Wheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington • 98368 ,1■7.- . www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org May 14, 2007 Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock WA, 98339 Re: WET SEASON EVALUATION, Portage Way Parcel # 962700107 OTH06-00023 Dear Mr. Nason: This office completed a wet season evaluation during the winter of 2006-2007 at the above referenced site. Jefferson County Policy 93-04 states that a wet season evaluation may be required to be repeated if the precipitation is less than 80% of average. If the rainfall is over 110% of average the applicant can request the evaluation be repeated. Fees for the reevaluation would be required. Port Townsend received 100% of average rainfall. The above referenced site falls just south of the Port Townsend rainfall area. It has been determined that this is a valid wet season. The results/report are enclosed for your review. If you have further questions please contact this office at 385-9444. Sinc- ely Linda Atkins Environmental Health Specialist cc Ryan Tillman, Tillman Eng, nay-NW off e„d I 1lark 2,ect..D+t COMMUNITY HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ALWAYS WORKING FOR A SAFER AND NATURAL RESOURCES MAIN: 360-385-9400 MAIN; 360-385-9444 FAX: 360-385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: 360-385-9401 - 42/11/28I31 12:59 36 03794451 JEFF CO DCD PAGE k JEFFERSONSO. PERMIT CENTER '. FOR OFFICE USE ea,.SHERIDAN ST WET SEASON EVALU T,�ISKIgOON Date I°�`-laA./Q6 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98780 `\\'� f��. _ . Fee S 31-114-- 000) 379.4450 - q Receipt # pC G t Check A` 2K 2 PROPERTY OWNER -�L "O akk�\Itlu������1 k\ Case A OrH (:)(0.. 23 MAILING ADDRESS .e.1 4)6144 y Lot P4, laI/a,. 'WA- ' 33'j CJ PHONE D3- - LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section q Township _Range PARCEL # C3(02. 7b7.-.) 179‘6. I o7 Subdivision Name k.)40137‘.. i Pla-F Division Block . Lot(s) SITE LOCATION I ( Orri'Rnd Sewage Disposal Permit Issued yes X no ?l ,,01i Date Issued / / Permit # SEP(57P - • THIS EVALUATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A GUARANTEE OF APPROVAL OF AN ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT. / Signature Y:47-d---- P / v ov-,i�, l DATE: \___. 1 — C4� DATE: o -\ _.Q r. • i Mote #1 I~ � , -111 Hole #1 I` a. 3�/ 1 C .0 I. . G It(A> 1i{11 Hole #2 G,CC Hole #2 t) W Hole #3 (Q1) Hole #3 1I 6(V 3S` .p[S ,a.81 9 IV Hole #4 •� Hole #4 a' r `rte COMMENT 1C. t i 1 ` -I 14 OJ-1%`)COMMENT• .;:'<,`.,�ij � G 1'� `tc rs a tl ,to ivy [�j " �1 �� . ATE/ 11 4E tact sAIs , . at a4 DATE , 'fl \ - I� Gon sr �j Ii 4 Hole #1 1-\ ( c 3a H le 1 1 t1 1611 ,c ‘;s<<-iA at 1L-Vu Hole #2 ;7- cti� 1 t1 ■ I) Ho #2 I a. " �- kr I n y� EA U Hole #3 (..t ) t\css\k +v t_t ;,)y H le #3 I� 0.� t'4 � 1 Hole #>I,*--1 i1-o G.'1 0.` .5 .p,�.�/sx. l �t'41 t ole 4 _ COMMENTS1c) 11;Oc.�f i'. '1, i � COMMENTS. la " c.\ \ , 1 �-- wnROMRNo w 4 TU141A U41.c�G )I I 1 �' 6 i cic. 3 �S 3�11 II- 2-‘(3--S / v� c .7 la 10 ' u 1 /a /c- 1 , , ilpir '41 (/) r o 1 r c)U) I ni —U —� r 1 O® = ..". s..,,,,::*11111i...- A NV N NN N i 0 -1 4 .,.rY V,.J. NN N •:...:,,,..0., ,.....:CA''' 14.000:00 'i .1 I. "1"-•* ' \ �\ NN N I' .... .__.......-....-...... . CD 0 CTD C rn � C CD Cal z O ........., C7 Off_ iV o.l y( N - x P 71 m p n W z E -. - -+c x o m Zr- v- m m'• N 0 0 �T m 2 0m2 h- 0 '.� . O 7 � � _ Z 8z N• rrI n n / -1 o �m ° I x RI o 9)o M n 2 2 OA gO c z m O Oz,- -= m zor m m I zi o -.1 2 O " z2 m � o oc 1 0m v m m m ° ; �� o o ° ro o or Q %' ' R . 4 CD rrI rri _ z• A 2 -0 Or- 0 Wm �-i o ha N� !� . - • Z VI CZ co C m o x m m m m o ob m m -I 0 ;..;...: o m VI REVISIONS DATE 6f 1 9 t g N \ / FRED & JUDY NASON TILLI11HN Al I R Co..) SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN DRAINFIELD AREA SITE PLAN ENGINEERING. INC. ? PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 '° '®'• 7 �J ` ao-nr.n.�o-nrns IV r / . I \ / \-----------------NN" . ' \I I 11. , x lb ..._,.. ... .r. „.... A ) - -3erasm-- N Nr — ---. Ass .i. 0,3 R 4,41/4. N 0 (...4 0 4 if WINI 1110)0001111 -.--- 1117411( ( 14111111 , .,. rii 1 1 -LI c■'17' __. ri CD -A I Z 1 Iiiiii444134411................H4iNer (Fik-- 0 ; 1 ■D , fTlir' 1 ...I r7-7 ■ trtt4"p I rn ■ o e i-.;F.,,,;• .-.1 , o 4. • k .y.q ztgak .Z. \ tw 8 =,.._j, 2"s,• 4 --- 1--- . ,,, •-•-\05vW .1- . :ile/441 4..■ N c"r" ' ' '. r. • 1 ■. i NS .1 f. '. REVISIONS DATE BY \ H 1 g FRED & JUDY NASON TILLMAN L, IQ SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN OVERALL SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. 01 WM PII1139001.COM 1 '4 1 -li PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 arzp=t7z; 3M-379-101.M0-371-0130 I'M 1 J ✓ " u AUG 0 2007 OPT of:„,"), j-/ sip Q-' 4 / REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON MAY 21, 2007 FOR FRED NASON GEOENGINEERS,G File No. 16338-001-00 1 7— Habitat Management and Buffer AUG 1 0 2007 Enhancement Plan 2 File No. 16338-001-00 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 21, 2007 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard, Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. Jos- • aghan Senior Biologist eri- Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAB jl ORCH116\16338001100\Finats116338001001IMP R.doe Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright©2007 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No.16338-001-00 J LA 1 ) II ',A; AUG 1 0 2007 1` r CII ii -. tilt' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 WIIdlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 CONTINGENCY PLAN 10 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 11 file No.16338-001-00 Page i GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007 � jl i ':. AUG 1 0 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) -- - Page No. List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A-SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B-SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C-BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D-USFWS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES LIST FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY APPENDIX E-NOAA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT STATUS OF WEST COAST SALMON AND STEELHEAD File No.16338-001-00 Page l[ May 2!,2007 GEOENGINEERSig REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON FOR FRED NASON INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock, Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest ''A of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence, invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement plan for the site is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Page 1 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007May 23,2007 S ' ly _. .. _, f !111's' AUG 1 0 2007 C E JEFfrEHSON COI'"ITY f 'C "I= CO,i:-ILLIIIIY nr1«1OP,-'E T documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species. This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USFWS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003);and File No.16338-001-00 Page 2 C May 21,2007May 23,2007 EOENGINEERS i) IN AUG 1 0 2007 L)l1 JEFFERSON CThNTY DEPT. OFCOMMUivliYDEVELOP iLfl • the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1975 and 2001). GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife,tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types(Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List— Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site (Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003)and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GEOENGINEERS 21.2007May23.2007 S i4-'Ji` I: !LI LI AUG 1 0 2001 I ;: DEPT Of C00,,I1J,I,)' UEV'LW, examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered and threatened species,critical habitat,candidate species and species of concern for this project. Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act(ESA)as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site(WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging along the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. File No.16338-001-00 Page 4 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007May 23,2007 S "fin. ''I AUG 1 0 2007 �" 17 'T n- l, Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat on the eastern side of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map(2007)of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive,but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Stria occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments,there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branca bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards(Anas platyrhynchos)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay (WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding. Frle Na.16338-001-00 Page 5 G EOENGINEER May 21,2007May 23,2007 S L i1 I 'I AUG 1 0 2007 Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra),Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimblebeny (Rubus parviflorus)and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea (Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore,not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs(tracks,nests,etc)and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented presence within the literature as described above in the PHS. File No.16338-001-00 Page 6 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007May 23,2007 S • DISCUSSION AUG t C 20G7 PROPOSED PROJECT —_V_r - A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County " development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet with a five foot building setback. After construction, the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way, therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces, such as roads, rooftops and driveways, cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 7 May21,2007May23,2007 GEOENGINEERS d di AUG G 0 01 20 ! _ Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation(Himalayan blackberry,poison hemlock and stinging nettle)will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table(Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C — Buffer Enhancement Plan is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. File No.16338-001-00 Page 8 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007May23,2007 S • Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting On-Center Estimated Common Name Scientific Name Spacing(feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 17 menziesii Hooker's willow Salix hooksriana 6 1 gallon 45 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 48 parvillorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 45 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 45 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 22 racemosa Indian plum Oemleria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasiformis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munitum Dune grass Elymus moltis 3 Plugs 240 Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds, small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. 9 File No.16338-001-00 Page M 21,2007Ma 23,2007 GEOENGINEERS� � r u it r 1 I AUG 1 0 2007 I' DEPT. O COisltA1,1) .�I GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site(Table 2). The term "recruitment"as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data should be recorded. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique(using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event,other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris,and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above,will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. File No.16338-001-00 Page 10 GEOENGINEERS( May 21,2007May 23,2007 1!! AUG t G CONCLUSIONS � ' �'_ This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native and cultivated species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals. REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853.2005. 50 CFR Part 226.Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register, Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311.2005. 50 CFR Part 17.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants;Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout.Federal Register,Vol. 70, No. 185. File No.16338-001-00 Page 11 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007May 23,2007 S I I 1; • it ;u. 4.i21 IIY UEVELOPr.:E�+I 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol.72,No.91. Desbonnet,A.,P.Pogue,V. Lee,and N.Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island.71pp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas.(Accessed April 25,2007) Jefferson County. 2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.iefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25,2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia,Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/lndex.cfm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska.Lone Pine Publishing,Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975.Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture.2001.Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area, Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/technical/soils/hydric lists/hydsoil-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candida e Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County.Revised December 20,2005. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland,Washington; 1:24000,7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990.Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) File No.16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEERS 21,2007May 23,2007 S Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29R01E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources.2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August 1, 2006. http://www.dnr.wa.govinhp/contactiwnhptrs.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) File No.16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007May 23,2007 Ferry St Ferry St C V A 6 Rd I o m a i A g: c a U J 6 C."P �g9 re 0, o% ..R a a` q. a/6,d epo.Fer�OId R d B,eTy Rd 0,7 a Laurel&1 16i CA- _AO X116) r Alcohol Loop Rd Pa Dvn�Dr Pia o SO�F�g�et eie,,,ga y� .r Flegler Rd m Fir Ave 3 N m i rC r m P %A.U Bruce/.�rl(I Washington Lo er` y4„a Q m x Oak Rd t0 I - A 0. s Olympic NP ¢0 a # v. hington m N r90 2,000 0 2,000 706 - - r- - w - e rD Feel 5 O17 l Mount Rainier NP F Vicinity Map m Notes: 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 181 Portage Way HMP a 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached t document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the e accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E R S Figure 1 m is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the 0 official record oth this communication. I L T �. 'E2EMN PSSA F e �j. I ej e eft ,I o I o _ a` O "rP (' fewevF', . . rf �- irk I y' E1EM'USN t ' — E1ABL' °,rte III i. / 1,f a* it,,,,IA,,, �1' �. 4 v-�—Ji //://// ,E f,/. ! ElAB/USN - 1 X77 I �' ; ` ■ s'-"''' 1 t�+-r? /rte ' / ° 0". i Asi i i_ ..„.a ,-` , 11. i 0 _„ , E1 UBL . a te 0. I ' I, :15 ' Oak Bay/Puget Sound s F � si T 1 . X a al' .. if EA PUBHN IN., ' kli i , ri E � IN t O. 7 N 500 0 500 AM z CO Site Boundary „AM F a Fee[ S s 1/.i, Wetlands P.,'M NWI Map Notes: 0- 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 181 Portage Way HMP 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached u document. GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the b accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E R Figure 2 s is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the e official record oth this communication. — 0 i3 Yi� (o _i ^l 0 e - ® er SZI .1`r ttra k 1..... n i ti T a • 5 I a ,o. ,-,3 '1t. , (y R B E m. § Td -Tidal Marsh in Site 500 0 Soo N Co - Coastal Beaches w E 14W s • Bk Belfast silt loam C3 Soils Feet s CIC - Cathcart gravelly silt loam HuC - Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map HvC - Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way HMP • WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy loam Port Hadlock, Washington Notes: 1.The locations of ad features shown are approximate t? 2.This drawing is for features discussed purposes. It is intended to G EO E N G I N E E R Figure• assist in showing features discusetl in an attached F� ure 3 document. GeoErgineers,In can not guarantee the E accuracy and content of electronic files. ----- -.. - ----------, -- -.. - , . ... - ...-, . L '' '`' ' E L '‘,..-..... GEOENGINEERS _(../7 1 . . ill ; II AUG 1 0 2007 i . . JEFFERSON CCONTY 1 ' r. cp, o 0:0i,dlY DEVELOPMENT ... , - , APPENDI SITE PHOTOGRA X A PHS / ( , ' \\\\\\0\\\ \\\ \\ , , . ....,, ....„ -.....__ F ' H h 1 0 2007 III- 1' JE% ETA{sc 0.TA1Y APPENDIX A Y Ut U v4e+E44IIY i7EVE UI''1,E"�I SITE PHOTOGRAPHS '-w 4._ y 5 a Photograph 1 Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest e J 4 *le Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern Mature vegetation to the west of the site portion of the site Fele No. 16338-001-00 Page A-1 GEOENGINEER May 21,2007 S. 1 11,`l. '! 1„ 1'i r i �; iii ►,1 tI AUG 1 0 2007 lit , 1 JE FEPSO OO!^!T'r DEPT. OF CO,alMUP'1TY DFVElOPh ErNI z a' 441 AL • d ;---Pas 1 lir Wit:' Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site i; lir e •4. • ..... f '{ a.emu, A .f 0-4 i • r---- "'V. •a t - � ''4-**"Ca •.' c r 44= r- __._ "P 's F �r ddc r �t" :B ,,..�+r <- 'F �g}- 4 ;r� a �� "•e r ' r.. F N '- x CFA 4 • 2 E Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal File No.16338-001-00 Page A-2 GEOENGINEERSa- May 21,2007 GEOENGINEERS v '� ;. v • ' ! 1 \ \ \ J/ I ! / // II 1 APPENDIX B �I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ' J /// l �r 1,:/, • \ \ \\\ \ (/\ \ 1 . \\ \ / \� AUG 10 / G] / k . . - _ ..: ■ « ± ± 0. -- - \ ± i .>«� . EE {) OPT. » gj r = a G k J __ m@ ' �t § \ ( / , , k 17 a 13 E ` ! k! « § ( Z P ; 66 - / ) § \ Q ) . � �In CL e, % tam # } } § ( 6 ® ®'% /. . ) f ° ° : �� �` . I.711\ 'j Si � � � §� �% • • � �� � i _& S. ��\\\ • � Cr II . ■�*o H El ¥ ii Gg !!| > § { | \ k\) \ F,}}/ 6/ s j !. c' ± ° ,; g = "UI ! f*! $ !t \ { )mac,!!8 ■a g i•o∎ » 4 _m _m_e_m\avo±\_m. ,._.- „„:-:. ' - ---- --- • - ''' ' •,-- •,-.' ", ;,- : rr- L ' ' V: L .= . • - - - - ,. .. 1 i i i AUG 1 0 2007 11-',1; .• ' _ I . , GEOENGINEERS // JuirEF4soN C01.1"!IY ----- . , \ ' . 1 , . [ , I 1 i I I///• . / APPENDIX C f/ IR/ BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN •,' //// ' , \ \ 1 ■ \\ , ,\''s-\N \\\\ \ ,\-\\\;,; ' \ \ \ \ N‘N \ \ \\\ ., \,,,,,,,, \\\\ \:;,:-.. \\\\N 2: --... \" *\\''. --‘, \ ' '...\\ , '.--,"---, \:\s,\, ,,X--.„-----„ \\,\,....N:s.,›..,.. .,,.... • \\--,N..,:---... — N 11;.1, 1 ii t /'n AUG 1 0 2007 C x w O 3 3 `iC PHS 4 �' --li G j a ° s z > w w DEr'T. Or CO.O.v ird TY V VEI Of - 10 d 0 L...1 °o a ° o � h 3 d m0 o �� m ao x x aC Ui Z iiI a= f* • 1S3M`oo,006L90z m roa W oFr y�°OS\ \I i 0 us jfr■II°1111/A1011`,N § -8 k .... . .4111111lik' A wwwas ;1,-,,, --,. ...... ,,..-,..... _ , „.. , - 4,rtf....,..4.......•.,/$0.04,,,,, ,,,,,, 4,,,, L.. 4.-0...x ,_ 0 0 o 4......e,(- o 0 . • 44,4h% o ,,1,0t,�\ In °o w ♦ W Fm ,, \, - Q o 0 Z(SH N°O ��p, W 0 0 z .£,. .of O1 E9OZ 'I.% ∎`4 Q °' o 0 4 J 0 411N1 CL ¢ o 00 z L._ w N 1 eyy . ry $ 8 ry $ P.,`,3 a n _ _ d m m n C 2 43 G I OW « Y I i_Q a s d fig o o a o o _ E 2H N N N N es 2 M 03 (D g m 1 8 ul a W N LO N :id' N N N y r i N g W g 1 1 L 0 g L w o -'vrr o!�z mz� 2 I Y 0 La o �° �° t xz0 _ _ p I 6 i Y z. rc Z SfF -• t Z.ci 1 LO/£Z/SO NWB•VfO 6mp 329eddy001.0 09££9;\Otl9\00\1009££9I\,d\HObo { r (, GEOENGINEERS 7 I . =:. ill/ =:. C:: iii 1 a it . I /// '-' '' ' ''' / APPENDIX D / USFWS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES . LIST FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY �l /I /1 (// ' I(I 7� � � \ \, ti Page 1 of 3 LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN WESTERN WASHINGTON AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE L (Revised December 20,2005) '1 j7 $I..' ' AUG 1 0 2007 I{1_ JEFFERSON COUNTY LISTED - Wintering bald eagles(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)occur in the county from about October 31 through March 31. There are three bald eagle communal winter night roosts located in the county. There are two bald eagle wintering concentrations located in the county along the Quinault River and the Washington coast. There are 91 bald eagle nesting territories located in the county. Nesting activities occur from about January 1 through August 15. Brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis)occur along the outer coast in the county. Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)occur in the county. Green sea turtles(Chelonia mydas)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) may occur along the outer coast in the county. Loggerhead sea turtles(Caretta caretta)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Marbled murrelets(Brachyramphus marmoratus)occur in the county. Nesting munelets occur from April 1 through September 15. Northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina)occur in the county throughout the year. Olive ridley sea turtles(Lepidochelys olivacea)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Short-tailed albatross(Phoebastria albatrus) may occur in the county. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 Page 2 of 3 2. Effect of the project on listed species'primary food stocks, prey species. and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation(e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat)that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. Castilleja levisecta(golden paintbrush) may occur in the count-. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment for this listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. 2. Disturbance (trampling, uprooting,collecting,etc.)of individual plants and habitat loss. 3. Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. DESIGNATED Critical habitat for the northern spotted owl has been designated in Jefferson County. ;! ` AUG 1 0 2007 Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet has been designated in Jefferson County. - ; Critical habitat for the bull trout has been designated in Jefferson County. PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Fisher(Manes pennants paci/iica)(West Coast distinct population segment) SPECIES OF CONCERN Aleutian Canada goose(Branta canadensis leucopareia) California wolverine(Gulo gulo luteus) Cascades frog(Rana cascadae) Coastal cutthroat trout(Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) Destruction Island shrew (Sorex trowbridgii destructions) http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 Page 3 of 3 Long-eared myotis(Myotis evotis) Long-legged myotis(Myotis volans) Northern goshawk(Accipiter gentilis) Northern sea otter(Enhydra lutris kenyoni) Olive-sided flycatcher(Contopus cooperi) Olympic torrent salamander(Rhyacotriton olympicus) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Pacific Townsend's big-eared bat(Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) Peregrine falcon(Falco peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresi) Tailed frog(Ascaphus truei) Van Dyke's salamander(Plethodon vandykei) Western toad(Bufo boreas) - i AUG 1 0 2007 11U) U 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY !?E'rf. OF COMMMUNITY OEVELOPh1E71T http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 GEOENGINEERS \\� \\\\ \1 ` \ . u t AUG , 0 2007 \gl, I))/ JEFFERSON CG h,1v ■ DEPT. Or CON AL11,;IIY DE\ElOi N' _`1._: ////// I APPENDIX E : /',l'i,1 /I////: NOAA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT STATUS OF WEST COAST SALMON AND STEELHEAD 1 if 7 i ( 4\\ Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon& Steelhead ` --- Current I"."-- t- T She t Endangered ESA Listing Actions Ll Species Act Under Review }T ? - -_- - _. Listin Status — I Snake River 1\ Sockeye Salmon 1 .fir oO 'j ((horhynchas 2 6cette lake Threatened 1' N .C I nerlm) 3 Baker River Not Warranted i "•-•-1 Q (2>. 4 Okanogan River Not Warranted (;: q Z~ 5 Lake Wenatchee No!Warvartled CM CC: 6 Quinalt Lake Not Warranted I .-_:5) U....T 7 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted O } 1 'Cr �U 8 ' Sacramento River Winter-tun i--�, O Chinook Salmi 9 Upper Columbia River Spring-run ___,_/ 1 r _d_ '-•,f l—' (0.tstmeyYwM) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened a W 11 Snake River Fall-run Threatened 12 Puget Sound Threatened 13 Lower Columbia River Threatened_ 14 Upper Willamette River Threatened 15 i Central Valley Spring-run Threatened 16 . California Coastal Threatened 17 i Central Valley Fall and Late Fall-run .Sedan atecon;Trt 18 I Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Nat Warranted 19 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 20 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring-tan Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River yammer/fall-run Not Warranted I23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast 1 Not Warranted 1 24 Deschutes River summer/fall-run NW War m ed 25 Central California Coast Colo Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northam California (0.kisa/ch) 27 Lower Columbia River Threatened • Critical habitat • 28 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 29 Southwest Washington Undetermined 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia -4.)...)- :,ut,c '."`i"y'E`; Ali 31 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run Threatened (0.ken) 33 Columbia River Threatened 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Not Warranted 35 Pacific Coast Not Warranted 36 Southern California 6arano), / 37 ! Upper Columbia River Threatened Steelhead 38 Central California Coast Threatened • ( • O.mykisa) • 39 South Central California Coast Threatened • 40 Snake River Basin Threatened 41 Lower Columbia River • 42 California Central Valley • • 43 Upper Willamette River Threatened 44 Middle Columbia River Threatened ' 45 Northern California Threatened • 46 Oregon Coast S. us a-Corners 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted • Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound Threatened • Protective Regulations • i 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon 51 Even-year Not Warranted (0.gorhusdr) 52 Odd-ear Na!Warranted t The ESA defines a"species'to include arty distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific salmon,NOAA Fisheries considers WI Evolutionarily Significant Unit,or"ESU."a"species"under the ESA.For Pacific seelhead,NOAA Fisheries has delineated Distinct Population Segments (DPSs)for consideration as"species"under the ESA. A, lai AUG 1 0 2007 J 1 JEFFERSON -'1'..IN?`; � DEPT OF CO,ti.10 I,±L :f , REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON MAY 21, 2007 FOR FRED NASON GEOENGINEERS t ✓, File Na.16338-001-00 Habitat Management and Buffer 1 Enhancement Plan AUG 1 0 2007 File No. 16338-001-00 JEFFERSON COUNTY } DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 21, 2007 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard,Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. 41141111 41. Jos- i I. - aghan Senior Biologist ‘4a"— Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAR:jl ORCH\16\16338001\001Finals\1633800100HMP R.doc Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright®2007 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No. 16338-001-00 U L '{1 , , AUG 10 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ='? Or ,r;,,,;.; , OP, ,i_ Pam No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 Wildlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 CONTINGENCY PLAN 10 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 11 File No.16338-001-00 PagE 1 G EO ENG I N EERSg May 21,2007 L. _ � k AUG 10 2007 wry ..'f1 DE L ' TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) — Page No. List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B—SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C—BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D— USFWS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES LIST FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY APPENDIX E—NOAA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT STATUS OF WEST COAST SALMON AND STEELHEAD File No. 16338-001-00 Page II GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007 ++tj AUG 1 0 2007 i REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN "I r r 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON FOR FRED NASON INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock,Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest 'A of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence, invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement plan for the site is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Page 1 GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007May 23,2007 , I It AUG 1 0 2007 L ' _ ' documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species. This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USF WS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003);and File No.16338-001-00 Pagel G EOE N G N E ERS5 May 21,2007May 23,2007 DUI AUG 1 0 2001 11` ?;• • JEFFEF ••1 :J]' DEPT.OF GO' rv'Ur:IT ' UE1 tlt , tr.1 • the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1975 and 2001). GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife, tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types(Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List— Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site(Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003)and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GEOENGINEERS( May 21,2007May 23,2007 ry "! ill AUG 1 0 2007 1 ` JEFFEa�n L,nT} DEPT. OFCr)iu;mU.drYJH`,r_ examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered and threatened species,critical habitat,candidate species and species of concern for this project. Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act(ESA)as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site(WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging along the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. File No.16338-001-00 Page 4 G EOENGINEERS May 21,2007May 23,2007 1;' !II AUG 1 0 2007 fFt Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat on the eastern side of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map(2007)of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments,there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branta bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards(Anas platyrhynchos)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay (WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding. File No. 16338-001-00 page 5 GEOENGINEERS( May 21,2007May 23,2007 �I !I AUG 1 0 2007 I ' ' Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra),Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea(Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore, not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs(tracks,nests,etc)and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented presence within the literature as described above in the PHS. File No.16338-001-00 Page 6 G EOENGINE ERS May 21,2007May 23.2007 DISCUSSION PROPOSED PROJECT A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet with a five foot building setback. After construction, the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way, therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces, such as roads, rooftops and driveways, cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 7 May21,2007May23,2007 GEOENGINEERS I+{ 0, AUG 1 0 2007 r,c` Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation(Himalayan blackberry, poison hemlock and stinging nettle)will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table(Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C — Buffer Enhancement Plan is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. File AV 16338-001-00 Page S GEOENGINEER5 May 21,2007May 23,2007 ; ! 1 n Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting On-Center Estimated Common Name Scientific Name Spacing (feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 17 menziesii Hooker's willow Salix hookeriana 6 1 gallon 45 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 48 parviflorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 45 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 45 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 22 racemosa Indian plum oemlaria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasiformis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munitum Dune grass Elymusmollis 3 Plugs 240 Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds, small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3.. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. File No.16338-001-00 Page 9 G EOENG I N E ERS_a May 21,2007May 23,2007 1 IC f i i OE?T. O` GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site(Table 2). The term"recruitment" as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data should be recorded. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique(using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event, other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris,and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above, will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. File No.16338-001-00 Page 10 G EDEN G I N E ERSQ May 2 1,2007May 23,2007 { CONCLUSIONS `-`ii 0` This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native and cultivated species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals. REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853.2005. 50 CFR Part 226.Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register, Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311. 2005. 50 CFR Part 17. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service.Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants;Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout.Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 185. File No.16338-001-00 Page 11 GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007May 23,2007 I �t 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol. 72,No.91. Desbonnet,A.,P.Pogue,V. Lee, and N. Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island. 71pp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas. (Accessed April 25,2007) Jefferson County.2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25,2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia,Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/]ndex.efm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska.Lone Pine Publishing,Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture. 2001.Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area,Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/technical/soils/hydric lists/hvdsoil-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candidate Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County.Revised December 20,2005. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland,Washington; 1:24000,7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990. Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) File No.16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007May 23,2007 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.htrnl !Pr (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29R01 E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources.2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August 1,2006. http://www.dnr.wa.govinhp/contactiwnhptrs.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) File No.16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGINEERS ( May 21,2007May 23,2007 Ferry St Ferry St A CteFem Pd tr L" m _ m m i a A0- o }`111 i Er +L i I f 1.'. i j s a p 0 <. •i ! e a6c HR ¢ a as o o G B4 era^/Naoa p �eRQ. �-Rd Old Ferry Rd &'rna,?6, Laurel St 16` Oope , 115,! Alcohol Loop Rd tyd nullao Or /9a� °o �F�a9�et e`i,Q. s Or■ S° Hagler Rd 0`ve 6 m Fir Ave cii I' 2 i p m K 0 it U Bruce Pyond Ali' Washington Ln. % —4' va yRn o m Oak Rd I 0 It- 03 m . — . . 0- 5 Olympic NP E . 0 a hington A y.• . 2 N 90 2,000 0 2,000 NW►� ...705 ��� w c n O Feet S Ma 12 Moun€Rainier NP 1 Vicinity Map m m Notes: 181 Portage Way HMP a f 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. A 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington 0. assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the u 6 accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E R S Figure 1 B is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the 0 official record 0th this communication. ' } ' ',• EEN vu F 9 I c psSA v �d v ? j + 6.:D I�> ® = : .r ;,X F ? ,"• 3 I1 � 'f'txy y f moo 1 C9 .u.r �'' d '. y ` ct;I SIMI • �_�U : rl ,p* ETABRASN r 7..1::::-.`t;" . i': 4 . i 1.-.,.- • 4.,• ,.J.'4iY,-',e, -/ '1- s t j 4. �. F , X X t , I 1 s a, t � v 'r : • L:7 i0 ' uft d m i n -t �' r e. E7UeC �$ F ._tea .. °mom > '' .s .— r .8 n � E 'm i a° ; Oak Bay/Puget Sound vilitc\ r d i^s •I II P y �'v Yc . II . - ` . ' I t PUBHH Ex i - , '�,. x i 0� <":aLKT:.. N. • . hY N n 500 0 500 Site Boundary Fe�� "fly F ° .r�°, Wetlands s I in NWI Map Notes: 181 Porta a Wa HMP a 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. g y 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port HadIOCk, Washington - assist in showing features discussed in an attached u document. GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the 8 accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file EO E N G I N E E R Figure 2 i4 is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc.and will serve as the E official record oth this communication. -- 0 , •• 7 •- : N- ® -c:.! I -: :,,,::[ . , '' ' A l' ' 1 , t ,. ,1 \rt,® .max J .. fp' t ....E :. . YY 1 a r rs- Jq ti m 7a pi 'm 0 si m f p in a it k E has Td-Tidal Marsh in Site 500 0 500 w A&Co- Coastal Beaches =iiy men Fe °s Bk- Belfast silt loam (3 w Soils s GIG -Cathcart gravelly silt loam HuC -Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map HvC - Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way HMP t WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy loam Port Hadlock, Washington Notes: u 1.The locations Mal features shown are approximate. 2.This drawing is for Ills intended to o assist in showing features discussed in an attached G EOE NGIN EERS_"0 Figure 3 8 doamere GeoErgineers,Ina can not guarantee the p accuracy and content of electronic files. - _ -- ..:-------1-------,i; ----.....---- . , ---1-,---,=----_----..z- „,• . --:, ".-.. • '::. ' . .1-:..S'-.. , • : ...___. ....... . . , :: . . rjii . 1 GEOENGINEERS . . . -----,- r , -, _„-..` 7 . lir-l• i 1! 1 1 . . . . . AUG 10 7007 [1--)/ I • . . - ; ..._ , 11‘,' uhvELoP,;,•,EN 1- , . : 1 . _ 1 , / 1//// /I/1 0 1/.. i j /I I, Ili /iii," APPENDIX A ;.,, ,,,,, ////t, SITE PHOTOGRAPHS / .. . ... • , . '/11 ;1;' : 1 I 1 ( ( ( ., _ \\\.• \ „... ...„,...,... ._,. ___, .. . , ...._ ..._ , , . .....„ ,.._ I 0 2007 I I � JEFTE950 t C!`.uNry APPENDIXA �' '� 0� ' U,r;.;_IUY DEVLLOH Etii SITE PHOTOGRAPHS • 4 v Photograph 1 Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest 067 r k 84 k'r e t �• _ t _ 'j' Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern Mature vegetation to the west of the site portion of the site III File No 16338-001-00 Page A-1 GEOENG INEERY:47 May 21,2007 rd AUG 1 0 2007 [UPI OFF Eq$OF coUNTY OFPT. QF CD,JOY !f`r DEVELOPh,EN 1 • ■ �d•'3 uF • Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site s _ :aa - X Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal File No. 16338-001-00 Page A-2 GEOENGINEERS May 21,2007 _ .. ... ..... , i,1 ! ■[ I r . I.,1 JP, AUG 10 2007 1,---- GEOENG1NEERS (37 APPENDIX B SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN . ,. .. .. . ///////::/,11/:,'2: / / / / 1 , ,I,1•1,1 I III!!,i 1(, I. , i'll 1,11 11111.l';' '''.''''.\'' \ ''''\\N.' ''''' ''. ‘ ' ,'* \ N. .'''' \\ '. :-''■ -. . ' .. , ■.- '■ ',,.'''- ._,_- '- . . . , . . . . . �..� � .�� \ . . Ii, §i / co j 1 AUG 10 2007 ( aaw § f awww • e ± \ ){ e\\ ~ \y \ \ ( \ \ | {) K....) m ... . --- / }2 ur - a 2f z LA 0 / I y , _ §to \ 2 : w / ` z § 0 \ ( § j i 10-1 tdo )) _ ) ia 3,/ Q. �w $ _ T \ )\ LA ^ •,. \\ - p e 2W + }y ¥ p �� . © ! w_ 2 ilk e \ 4 0 �� 2 , ate . ■ Ilfr 411 4„4, �� ,:\ 44JJ[ : ~® S * \ Lo/ \ §% 9 1!• * .F t 0 0 �| j 4 « §§; \)f \1i 0 \/m G 4 El C CD s .; / / `!+§ ` !«|| . o : o)!{ ! ® 2 |[§! / ){ ( \ q»,.0 2 ra , i/\ ) avizigo _e _mwm_m_m\_m «e . . , GEOENGINEERS ___........,, . . . . 1 APPENDIX C BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN . . . '-.,``.,,,,:v1 --,-,-i• liSylk' ( ( . : k- \\\\. \-•-•-•--. • . 1 .\,\\\ -., • • • • ■+ + \ , -' - -. - \"\\\'\\:-- '-• '•-• \ ',,.•„,‘„ ,... , . ., .., -,,, „ \-\.......,,,,---- - ,...... .....„...„. ,.....,...-..,„--- ...\\ ..... ..„ „.._ _, ..,„_NN. •,„„: , , ...-- ._ _-, -- !t ,v, AU'� 1 0 1u LI w x J a a 1--. a r ._._. = w o 3 1 rr--i C' z > ww Dc TOF- OOwiylu :IrvU-. 1� m a ° o o m a o 5 a >,w 3 m _� E 0 03 t._ OW w o 1 ao x x c m Y N o W° w ° t m w Mui a O w i= Z CC lS3,H B mo t7 (* op sp co a Z 2 .090e p W y1.,\ V II'illa o 0hr 111.114't /II f ii N Nth\Alp 11°P � w N w � ce o / \,�O m 0.N N � ' �� ¢o w o CC z ,pp z o g 7 •0p o 3 4` pF£902 y1p � m w¢ N Q LJ a w , W 0 0 cc z a °0 1- w w An 3 s e y f„y ^- m A. m m e m l ag a� r w a � Q Q Q Q -_.Y_- 11 E N N N 1.0 Eyy I ^C E M O g ^ m a v a n .., am=4 Ow W p- 1 2 2 2 2 2 ? = m } m m 3 € > I1, c 8 a O O a - c .$t m i 74 Z �n�a Nmw oWa °a a ay,,. � LL Y s Y Y Y Y . 2^ g• c"y" SLiowo ,� m = € = y s V Yy- 0 ce wQ �w -_ mac d 00 0a0 ooa az IA F. u o era e 000 ox3 wiz �0 xzo o�rn �Ln_ o : ° d 6 i e '3 T. K Y 2 ig e - m E y • n y rc B I. w m E` °' ._ _ mpg a L P r y S i y4 z o g'T s' o 0 z�N G Lo/£z/so **48Y0 fun p•Dveddtl00101g££9L\aVD\00\L009££9L\:d\H0210 . . . . . [...-.. ...• _. -._ •••._- -_ - _-•• -.. • :•.„--. -- AUG I 0 2007 It!) • _ , ,., -...,, • - , ---, . -•. -.. - .. • i ( . ••.., -, -. . . JEH'ERS(2. ! 1'1,)1Ycl-r• , GEOENGINEERS /.,7 DEeT. OF Crjrx.,J,-,ir,,, DEvilr,2,,- -... • , . r ) i r r r r , ' • , . . . . 1:'.',..',';,, • .. APPENDIX D USFWS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES LIST FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY ''-• I/iil,..., •1,•, ,' . ' • /11/7/••,:'•;., , •J.//naii • '//11/74,1"(/' iiiiii 1/1fiiiiii( i/ l / /Ii hi II • \\\,' _ \., \\\ — \ e\:\ '• , ..,NN N „, „...\„....:.....,--„,..__ „.,-„ , ... . ...2.„, _--„...... .. „, „ ......_ , Page 1 of 3 LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN WESTERN WASHINGTON AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE _ WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised December 20,2005) I; i+ I i H H AUG 1 0 2007 ( JEFFERSON COUNTY " LISTED ____ Wintering bald eagles(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) occur in the county from about October 31 through March 31. There are three bald eagle communal winter night roosts located in the county. There are two bald eagle wintering concentrations located in the county along the Quinault River and the Washington coast. There are 91 bald eagle nesting territories located in the county. Nesting activities occur from about January 1 through August 15. Brown pelicans(Pelecanus occidentalis) occur along the outer coast in the county. Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)occur in the county. Green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) may occur along the outer coast in the county. Leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)occur in the county. Nesting murrelets occur from April 1 through September 15. Northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina)occur in the county throughout the year. Olive ridley sea turtles(Lepidochelys olivacea)may occur along the outer coast in the county. Short-tailed albatross (Phoebastria albatrus) may occur in the county. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 .• Page 2 of 3 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks. prey species. and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. Castilleja levisecta (golden paintbrush) may occur in the county. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment for this listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. 2. Disturbance (trampling, uprooting. collecting, etc.)of individual plants and habitat loss. 3. Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. DESIGNATED `IJ a 1; If�4 Critical habitat for the northern spotted owl has been designated in Jefferson County. ! AUC ! 0 2007 Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet has been designated in Jefferson County. • i, r.. Critical habitat for the bull trout has been designated in Jefferson County. PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Fisher(Mantes pennanti pacifica) (West Coast distinct population segment) SPECIES OF CONCERN Aleutian Canada goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia) California wolverine(Gulo gulo luteus) Cascades frog(Rana cascadae) Coastal cutthroat trout(Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) Destruction Island shrew(Sorex trowbridgii destructions) http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 , . Paee 3 of Long-eared myotis (M otis evotis) Long-legged myotis (Mvotis volans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) Northern sea otter(Enhydra hurts kenyoni) Olive-sided flycatcher(Contopus cooperi) Olympic torrent salamander(Rhyacotriton olympicus) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Pacific Townsend's big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrines) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresi) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) Van Dyke's salamander(Plethodon vandykei) Western toad (Bufo bore as) i ' ' ' 1 il i ri')i AUG 1 0 2007 I.1 1 JEF FRSOPJ COUF!ly °E'er. 0r 'OMMUidltY DEVELOPME,yr http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo Ise/SE_List/JEFFERSO.htm 4/24/2007 GEOENGINEERS .,i i ''+L, , , AUG 1 0 2007 ' It � �'li J F A E FSUt� f_ DEPT. O f--CONLNAh';IIY DEtiEt(7f , APPENDIX E NOAA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT STATUS OF WEST COAST SALMON AND STEELHEAD l/, ��,/�f% J 1/rll/I(, i/, � ,r, r li 1 //✓.M; � I �"/tll, ,!l"f /1/11��lr i fir!%;h!�� llt dr 7r10/111 f;1. i 'II \ \ r Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon& Steelhead Current I t , 4= ) Species't Endangered ESA Listing Actions ' Species Act Under Review —.- ``; h Listing Status ,_,,I i J I Snake River \ r Sockeye Salmon - ( (Onmrhynchar 2 Ozetle Lake Thrcatend l e N r `r-I ) 3 Baker River Not Warroated CD ' 4 Okanogan River Not Warranted 1,,._1 I 5 Lake Wenatchee Not Warranted Cr',:).- I 6 Quinalt Lake Not Warranted = r -='.. ; 7 Lake Pleasant Na Warranted-, • Lt.'U 1 8 Sacramento River Winter-tan (__�_,�� Chinook Salmon 19 Upper Columbia River Spring-run "- H: (O.Ishawy[rcha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened 1 �: �.—t w Il Snake River Fall-run _ _Threatened_ Ca •-.. 12 Puget Sound Threatened 13 Lower Columbia River Tlvintened 1 14 Upper Willamette River Threatened I 15 Central Valley Spring-nun Threatened___ 16 California Coastal Threatened 17 Central Valley Fall and Late Fall-run 7‘+'''' ' 18 Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Not Warranted 19 Oregon Coast Not War nnied 20 1 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 1 Middle Columbia River spring-run Not Warranted I 22 I Upper Columbia River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 I Deschutes River summertfall-run Not Wammted 25 Central California Coast /nr/an,rnv Cahn Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northern California MI c etc it ell (0.(match) 27 Lower Columbia River Threatened • Critical habitat 28 j Oregon Coast Not Warranted f 29 Southwest Washington Undetermined 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia 1,i'''''''' ,:,—?.ii 31 Olympic Peninsula I Not Warranted Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run T!ventened____ . (0.kant) 33 Columbia River Tim m'enrd 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Not Warranted 35 Pacific Coast i Not Waman& 36 Southern California ladancn�i 37 Upper Columbia River Threatened Steelhead 38 Central California Coast Threatened (O.mykss) _---------.__.__.- 39 South Central California Coast _ 40 Snake River Basin Tlueertenc_± Threatened '__ I 41 Lower Columbia River Threatened 42 California Central Valley Threatened 43 Upper Willamette River Thrcannred 44 Middle Columbia River Threatened 45 Northern California Threatened 46 Oregon Coast H.,,t.t.,"„ ,,,R,,;,,,:. 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula I Not Warranted _ _.. Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound • Protective Regulations 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted 1 Pink Salmon 51 Even-year an Not Warranted f { (0.gorhuscha) _.. 52 Odd-year Not Warranted • 1 The ESA defines a"species"to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific saloon,NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Significant Unit,or"ESL',"a"species"under the ESA. For Pacific stcelhead,NOAA Fisheries has delineated Distinct Population Segments (DPSs)for consideration as"species"under the ESA. RECE' IV J MAR 2 008 JEW , IN COUNTY BCD , �� v \( X REVISED REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON March 21, 2008 FOR FRED NASON II G E O E N G I N E E R S File Na. 16338-001-00 Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan File No. 16338-001-00 March 21 , 2008 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard, Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. • Jose: •. alfaghan Senior Biologist Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAB:jl ORCH\16\16338001\00\Finals\1633800100Revisedlll4P R.doc Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright©2008 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No.16338-001-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 Wildlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 10 CONTINGENCY PLAN 11 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 File No. 16338-001-00 Page! GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Pane No. List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B—SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C—BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D— PLANTING DETAILS APPENDIX E—SPECIES LISTINGS APPENDIX F—WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS File No. !6338-001-00 Page ii GEOENGINEERSO March ll.2008 REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON FOR FRED NASON INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock,Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest % of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence,invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement plan for the site is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Page 1 March 21,2008 GEOENGINEERS_O documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species. This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an HMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USFWS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003);and File No. 16338-001-00 Pagel GEOENGINEENS March 21,2008 • the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] 1975 and 2001). GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife, tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types (Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List — Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site (Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003) and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GioENGINEERSO March 21,2008 examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered and threatened species,critical habitat,candidate species and species of concern for this project. Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging along the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. File No.16338-001-00 Page 4 GEOE NG I N E E R March 21,2008 Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat on the eastern side of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map (2007) of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive,but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments,there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branta bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri)along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding. File No.16338-001-00 Page 5 GEOENGINEERS/ March 21,2008 — Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra),Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea (Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corms brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore, not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs (tracks,nests, etc) and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented presence within the literature as described above in the PHS. File No.16338-001-00 Page 6 GEOENGINEERS( March 21,2008 DISCUSSION PROPOSED PROJECT A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 65 feet with a five foot building setback. After construction, the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way,therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces,such as roads,rooftops and driveways,cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. File No.16338-001-00 Page 7 GEO ENGINEERSg March 21,2008 Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation(Himalayan blackberry,poison hemlock and stinging nettle)will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table (Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C — Buffer Enhancement Plan and Planting Specifications is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species, planting specifications and schematic, as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. File Na. 16338-001-00 Page 8 GEOENGINEERS_cil March 21,2008 Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting Common Scientific On-Center Estimated Name Name Spacing(feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 31 menziesii Hooker's willow Salix hookeriana 6 1 gallon 43 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 74 parviflorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 43 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 43 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 8 racemosa Indian plum Oemleria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasiformis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munitum Dune grass Elymus mollis 3 Plugs 307 Plants will be installed according to specifications outlined in Appendix C. A Mulch ring will be placed around the drip line of each plant and soils will be amended if needed. Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds, small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. Bird boxes will be installed on existing trees and/or on individual pedestals installed within the enhanced buffer. The Site Development Plan in Appendix B illustrates the proposed location of bird boxes. Bird box specifications should follow guidelines established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife located at their website http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/backvard/nest- mat design.htm and the attached publication Nest Boxes for Birds in the WDFW Urban Wildlife Series (Appendix F). TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. File No.16338-001-00 Page 9 GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. An as-built report will be developed and submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation by someone with expertise in native plants. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will be conducted by an individual with native plant expertise and will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. Yearly Monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted to the county by October 31 of each monitoring year. GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site (Table 2). The term"recruitment" as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data will be recorded in the form of an as-built report. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique (using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event,other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris, and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. File No.16338-001-00 Page 10 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 Sj CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above, will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. CONCLUSIONS This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance and enhancement activities; • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals. File No. 16338-001-00 Page 11 GEOENGINEERS March 21,2008 REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853. 2005. 50 CFR Part 226. Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311. 2005. 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout. Federal Register,Vol. 70, No. 185. 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol. 72,No. 91. Desbonnet,A., P. Pogue,V. Lee,and N. Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island. 7lpp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas. (Accessed April 25,2007) Jefferson County.2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.iefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25,2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia,Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/E SA-Sal m on-Li stings/S almon-P opul ati ons/Index.cfm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska.Lone Pine Publishing,Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture. 2001.Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area,Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/technical/soils/hydric lists/hydsoil-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. http://wetl and sfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.htm l (Accessed April 25,2007) File No. 16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEEESg March 21,2008 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candidate Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County. Revised December 20,2005. http://www.fws.gov/westwafwo/se./SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland,Washington; 1:24000, 7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990. Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. htv//wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29RO1E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August 1,2006. http://www.dnr.wa.govinhp/contact/wnhntrs.ndf (Accessed April 25,2007) File No. 16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGINEER March 21,2008 S _..__ _.... _.. _ l , rerry.St------Ferry St ,n :U .cAsaemµa-I ,a, 1 Is 5', I� IS rS va z N :a A e yli U ` .- ....+,fir Rv c 1 aide"R a Rap,y a &.tea fj y Ra I rel.St �,. . 1111 Yt•c 11, f rl,' _.� 11 .—Alaehel k p Rd,r 0n ON f .` ,pti�- Dunlap-0n 9��e R 5 Flagle,Rtl °�� a i irAv U N - r > Site U r xG WeehinglonLn. o` 0zn Fe * Olympic NP E a if�{y�',,1 90 2,000 0 2,000 gli mom 1■1 > " eeee� eeee� W F.1,0 N �} Let 0 F, b9ount Rainier NP Vicinity Map Notes: I n 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 181 Portage Way H M P• 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington a assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the //,�'/� oaccuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E RS /// Figure 1 is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the j/ O official record oth this communication. i F1,MN pcgq � s M I _,ii al , . t mu ` EfABLr 111111111"1' E2AH UN! � P R � 9 fi X i . ",..„u .� q$L Y. Pe Et Oak Bay/Puget Sound 3 "' ‘1111' II �;' s4! 1 Cat( 7,-4 i s. to 'PUBHH "1 • v x II mi ,, r E N 50C C tic A N Site Boundary w. ly E ? Feet s tele Wetlands I NWI Map m "ores: a Portage Way 181 Pt a a HMP 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. g Z This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington ° assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the /�, 'J� o accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file G EO E N G I N E E R� /// Figure 2 is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the .fi1� 0 official record oth this communication. 4r8 Q13 (3D GI3 CHID err✓ •n n ke N V W \ x�k$� K 1 2 litiS X E c � N Td Tidal Marsh in Site 500 - _ 500 01% o Co-Coastal Beaches — — W E Bk- Belfast silt loam Soils reef 5 CIC-Cathcart gravelly silt loam HuC-Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map HvC -Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way H M P WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy loam Port Hadlock, Washington Notes: 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2.This dzwcw, ,is for in}omatlon purposes. It is intended to G EO E N G I N E E R 5� Figure assist in showirg features tliscrased in an attached 3 document GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the 8 accuracy and content of electronic files. -- "' GEOENGINEERS ._a S�� i , ///// //////,J /� / APPENDIX A 1///1 /l :i 11111 7/Ili I ti:1/'//./SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1 / r'i'1:' 111,17111/,.//0 1 7/,,,,,, I'l I /1;11 9 \ `t\ `-. APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photograph 1 Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest „ Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern portion of Mature vegetation to the west of the site the site File No.16338-001-00 Page A-1 December 14,2007 CEOEHGINEERS • • 77"*, am ... Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site • Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal File No.16338-001-00 Page A-2 GEOENGINEER5g December 14,2007 _ _ ms's GEOENGINEERS 7 1 1 t + I II � , r ' / i; APPENDIX B SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN �/ f ' /4 lie t//,/,. ' 17/§///' //////7/e, j/'lit '1 //V // (11/ II . e. ) § { / }\ Tu co k VI ) ui • £ ■ ) z kV F o cr■2v 0 ° \\\ (® % ` \ j§ \ . III �» m \\ La LNI K z * ) 8s � §\D2 G j� % » % ,§ 6 yl /3 - \ • ��0 ( ## §2\ ` ### ##« 15� �����}33 ft 2 & ;*,# ���1 )¥ � / \� \� � )\ Ow 2 \ ` \ II } � a § Z ® / � , � \: A � \ t‘4•S � / \ ,g �� \ ) Q \ �\ ∎∎ q 1,1 VI , y y % % � C/ /§ Z / ( 2\\\ 12|) IN !` ` \ } /2)) \ }k | 2(( } 1 h®7 \ z, . +. _e _z_amw_mm, GEOENGINEERS / \ \ \ \\ 1 I i ill/ l ;/ o/ '/ it,////// APPENDIX C BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN �� ��f 7 lie.//py,' ///g/1114 47/1/1/fri hit( 1 7 iliffi i Irt I lift om... z U o a o� W Y K m ina° w ° ci in a°wa as m S. id >m a wiz in c IS "' CL o W a o w ° a 2 m 1 i>.3 Li c ...13 o m N rt. C �y • 1S3M t o III i •°O B W O m W w ,pp !9 0. = Z °zzX 'pf£ pZ g 07 -e 3 A s m 2 , y17 m ^Q Z w z a pS ` W w 30a .-I 0 n Z ,W^ ~q m� � V +p , a o o_ IN L a.mz 41 amLL) Gw7 W w^ 0› o z.!i>e a g z N 3 °w a�� �/ N a o +,- �Sw \ w 0 /44 ZW a ' • - CO -4 b S \ Q z o 3 a Z '� � LL g o Z ,pp \� o J 3aQJ ,pp -3 o £F p W °in ° ," 0 v o 03 a o Wc 9°‘ 114°4/ LI ` O`A CY QQ C 7(n ifi�0� J CC nw T> V a C �4 W 4 8 o J W } w d z $c M �ZMr w W 3 W wJ,W WQ a U.CO �m Q,__z O a 3 3 w 0 `m v a p m m N m w o o at ip gyp] ip� `'''� a ° _> y 6 S 5 E o.awo� °a E 1 FE E i 8S:7 6 A • 0 0 A A A j Q N Q N Q P V VI g_iffl i p M O 01 m7i4m e LO V N N _g 5 xi ijTljj 5 V Q ' «- K.o m i l ° €h<liii E z ,-w ��Z wZ Z ---.•.•-_- ..... _ 30as i,ww cwo in dEhm m ' ■ s M inwa inmw owa wa 11 il ij I i,! e, E�Ei g o wYZ 0mo woZ ow w owo a if +6 z Z o°o"° 0z3 00—wm a� g emu 0 3 =zo o,in .u, �o aE� z a w wm"a g .. - . �. z .c'J y z e 20/1Z/£0 rweirre bmP'001008££9l\OV0\00\I006££9l\d\H3do GEOENGINEERS Q \ \ r \\\ \ i I i I Oh/ J ////// lifii ii/7//// y, yrAPPENDIX D PLANTING DETAILS 'l'1111/Ill/ ii 117/71 / /'ill,'/I/114://4/1/11111/7 4/11( /lip ill lilt \ 1 li \\ \ (\ 0 OJ N J_N 9 CC W I-OO C rt O Sow E a o a O = WWK - N C W fn Y�O n =L 1- z alga -; n m m H- LLL Z� =a G p .`o 'o y C 7Ol V r a2 'E o W a\ -.. o m a m Z & 2 �,� o Z�n 1 lo- 0 w °°ti r,4F1\ _ C CD g a 3 g Fe a Z 4 ,r, ter os_ W ,,.rte 1r 1f �4y :7 d J;! o 5 W -ti 1, .:4`...-4:14. iy �p c5t Ec :JJ :'e�i�y /= E c_m A v T E c;ogE m fiwmE z 4.".-4 Y Ew �S I�� U wa Qa08 t§ 3 z Y f o.Ze) ❑ E2 Caw Z NF- f2 WZ K m N 00 ul in un ° <4 v Tr D z iL (-) 66666 (2. 6 UZ( 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 N (0 (0 l0 t0 I0 N 1D oN z Z Z Z Z Z Z C 0 0 0 O O U, O 0 7 W J J _1 J J J J §g o ••.• •• i Z m E o:: CO • •• • • • mg W t I • ®0O tl F ® C a m i` a Z o f 0 . 0 • • • • c IX = O 2 § e d C 1 @ € to C ' •000 • • • mqv Y O LE ei 12 Q p`i 4P-S W gEA, a o W a_WV E Z r w w m°a . g lx ct y . J z m m Em5s F m O L` w C 3 w w - sqg LU ,n m a Ln Li ❑ a R2`°. s pJ w n Q J S m Z Y y 0 W Z a. -` a O D I w 000o 0 'Q m 2 o l- O Z OS N c Z -` c -o u w v a„g3 OJ • • • • ® •• •• •• 2411 0 m.taw ZEN K L0/6L/Z1 MYI9• fB 6M1Y001008££91\0VO\00\L008FF9 L\.d\H3 O GEOENGINEERS / \\\\ \ i i I , / il Of /V0 ' ////////7/1, APPENDIX E wiiiii/d/ /Vile, SPECIES LISTINGS / f,; 0////0 p„,,,/,„ fll ,, 41( 1 Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon&Steelhead Current Species' Endangered ESA Listing Actions • Species Act Under Review Listin•Status Snake River l Endangered Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynehus nchus 2 (Drente Lake Threatened nerka) 3 Baker River I Not Warrmned 4- Okanogan River Not Warranted 5 I Lake Wenatchee Not Warranted ft , Quinalt Lake Not Warranted 17 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted 8 Sacramento River Winter-run Endan?ered Chinook Salmon 9 Upper Columbia River Spring-run ", Emden,ered (0.tshanytscha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened 11 Snake River Fall-run Threatened 12 Puget Sound ._ Threatened 13 Lower Columbia River Threatened 14 Upper Willamette River Threatened 15 Central Valley Spring-run Threatened 16 California Coastal ___Threatened_ _ 17 Central Volley Fall and Late Fall-run 18 t Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Not W'ananted 19 • Oregon Coast -- Not Warranted --_ 20 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring-run Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 Deschutes River summer/fall-ma Not Warranted 25 t Central California Coast &tdan tered Cohn Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northern California Threatened (0.kindeh) 27 Lower Columbia River Threatened • Critical habitat 28 Oregon Coast .Vry O'arrmtted 29 s Southwest Washington !ndetcrminrd 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Species of Concern 31 Olympic Peninsula tut irm.unrcd Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run Threatened (0.keta) 33 Columbia River Threatened 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Not Warranted 35 Pacific Coast Not Warranted 36 Southern California 37 Upper Columbia River Threatened Steelhead 38 Central California Coast Threatened (0.mykiss) 39 South Central California Coast 1 Threatened 40 Snake River Basin Threatened 41 Lower Columbia Rivet Threatened 42 California Central Valley ' threatened 43 Upper Willamette River Threatened ' 44 Middle Columbia River Threatened 45 Northern California Thremened 46 I Oregon Coast 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound Threatened Protective Regulations 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon 51 Even-year No(Warranted (0.gorbuseha) -Even:year -. .. 52 Odd-year Not Warranted 1 The ESA defines a"species"to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific salmon,NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Significant Unit,or"ESU,a"species"under the ESA. For Pacific steelhead,NOAA Fisheries has delineated Distinct Population Segments (DPSs)for consideration as"species"under the ESA. GEOENGINEERS5 \ �� `1 1� e :-: \ \ E , ill Iii ON 1 /IP/'11// ii //////17/11 APPENDIX F 7. WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS // / / 1 1/11//////7771 All :z 1//,/171/1/ ,i/#/le ,/ill//(1(111 i I Ifillill I( ' : r, �yf, A‘ • . e� ,. � i tom, ±i•llti , .: -� *0\114' 1' -_. z��T-.an T"M�•,i . rlCfK\ ^.. fL ' ..k L�1 151, '1/ t‘,-.......1'.';‘,'.k‘,.:":1 \\1\ 11 ;":•0. }Y�':.il kit��1 At. t . .11 �' . , l.':'• 1/� !J, � t�d �� `�AAr�� �r wr� wiirw,Zii w� ' ,• I r � ' '7�t ,rt � � aSt o ^�•rrrrs�n�=r1"4":7 "21:4111r r .(• !}..,° �°t• A -"volt r .rewr�r —raj,"urwn r tit ': +„�,!y� .• -IIC41Rbr'v��M118 w i. ' r It_ -�Y IL�/ *Pø �I/` i Ili,I 1 .. .. 1 1 , , -�,. I iii 1 l,i ti..1). :, ` .� I III tl , ilt , H r1 s I p I \, l ICI"'4 , ! •� ;l .,t. "'w 'J...: ]I .y:. t:," 9{4v ! 1 I , 1 �,r rf ]/!^' 1r .Jr.f,, r rd-• • 1 r I 1 41.25P :/ 44 i t4{ 1i t � ., y1 ` I,..y.. ict "r` I 'r ,+f• ,'>� .v t 1*'!-, �4LY ' a 11 ( •.r>°` i sc • i i� 7t�'w w 7�P4 z 'A 4 •`I`i: i tO ' 1 II ' Patti a 1... • •ri ri1. y d }y• ,..• I I i 1 'i .fir.. �r ��/r J . i I 1 I \\ "••:,:- i I { i I J t d is r �'t s , a 1 IV I l! j __S. ++ I _1 f-. W, .4151i:-.4 5 3 3 .• ;i4 Itb " lu,si Urban Wildlife Series Washington Department of Wildlife F' JEST BOX R B � D O As a tree dies, sections of it decay and make up for natural homes that are lost when become hollow. These cavities are dry and too many trees in a bird's habitat are removed. warm, serving as secluded nurseries for many These cavity-nesting birds can, in turn, help young birds. In Washington, about 43 different you by eating insects that may harm your trees kinds of birds nest in holes in dead or dying and bushes. Being concerned about wildlife trees. Of these birds, 15 often occur in city also shows good stewardship for our state's parks and around homes. The more common irreplaceable natural resources. ones are chickadees, nuthatches, flickers, This publication covers nest box building swallows and wrens. materials; designs, construction and place- Putting up nest boxes can help these ment; pest proofing; tips on attracting birds to cavity-nesting birds. Your artificial nest helps your yard. and facts about cavity-nesters. 2. , ii5 ' Materials Design . You can buy a bird house through special ENTRANCE HOLE: mail order suppliers, the National Audubon Design and construction of a bird house Society or local need to be bird specific. The most important garden and part of that bird house is the entrance hole. If nursery stores. . the hole is too small, the desired bird won't be Or you can build able to enter. If it's too big (and this is more one following likely) undesirable wildlife —like house spar- the guidelines i1 I 1 rows, starlings, squirrels and cats—can get in and plans in this ill and harm or evict the intended bird. publication. 1II,'` iAs a rule, house sparrows can't enter a Whether you �I I nest box if the entrance hole is less than 1.25 buy it or build it, inches in diameter. Starlings can't enter if the here are some I '� �I� hole is less than 1.75 inches in diameter. The important things , ,��, entrance hole sizes in this publication are to keep In mind. , ,i, ` :f'! designed to exclude these pests wherever Wood is "'� I I( possible. the best material ( l` Ili: ; - to use for bird I ROOF: \, ,� houses. It's a ' I Roofs need /At 1,, 7 good insulator, to be built with i, f ' )l 'r �• it's available and enough of a slant l 11 easy to use, and to shed water. The I fJ it blends in well with the landscape. Three- top front edge of the roof should overhang at quarter inch boards are the easiest to work least 3 inches to protect the entrance from with. Soft Wood, such as pine, is fine for driving rain or snow, and to keep cats from smaller nests, but cedar or redwood may be reaching in from above. used for larger boxes. If you use plywood, Provide a hinged side or roof so houses make sure it is exterior grade. A well-con- can be easily checked and cleaned out each structed house should last 10 to 15 years. year. (Annual cleaning reduces the possibility Use galvanized nails to build houses if of spreading parasites and diseases from year necessary, but remember that they loosen up to year.) Hinges should be rust-proof. Duck as wood expands and contracts in extreme and owl box roofs kept shut with a hook and weather conditions. Cedar and redwood nest eye can be opened by raccoons. It's much boxes should probably be made with concrete easier to use paired roofing nails with large coated or ring shank nails. These nails won't heads or duplex nails on the side of the roof allow the boards to loosen up. Screws also and the upper edge of a side. Wiring these work fine. nails together will keep the bird house shut and raccoon-proof. DO NOT use wood treated with green preservative. The green copper-based preservative,when ex- posed to water,can produce poisonous vapors. DO NOTpaint,stain or treat box with creosote. DO NOTuse tin cans, milk cartons or metal for nests. Metals quickly heal up to lethal temperatures on warm spring and summer days, overheating the eggs and killing the birds. Commercial plastic wood duck houses are also acceptable but they should be placed in shady locations. 3. SIDES AND SEAMS: other species of birds arrive, put netting or wire Natural tree cavities have rough interior over the entrance hole. surfaces that give young birds traction, espe- cially when climbing out of the nest. A bird WHERE: house can mimic this rough surface below the The nest box should be somewhat entrance holes with grooves, cleats, hardware concealed, in partial shade and placed where cloth or a similar surface that can be gripped predators can't get to it. Check to be sure the by the bird's feet. birds have an adequate, clear flight path near Don't nail the sides to the top of the the entrance hole. If possible, the entrance floorboard. The sides of a bird house should should face away from the prevailing wind. It enclose the floorboard. This keeps rain from usually helps to put the box on a habitat edge: seeping into the crack between sides and floor between a group of trees and low-growing and then into the nest. Placing the floorboard bushes, or between bushes and an open 1.25 inches above the meadow, lawn or water. bottom of the sides All nest boxes should be firmly attached also keeps moisture to a support post or a tree. When attaching a from seeping in from nest box to a live tree, use lag screws and below. washers. These screws can be gradually All seams that loosened as years pass, allowing the tree to won't be open should o grow without any deformities. be water tight. Exterior . o glue or caulking materi- HOW MANY: als work well for this. A good rule of thumb is to allow 1/4-acre between most bird houses. Because most VENTILATION birds are territorial, the average-sized yard will HOLES: probably only hold one nesting pair of a par- At least two 1/4- ticular species. Territory size varies among inch holes should be drilled near the top of the birds—house sparrows and tree swallows right and left sides of all bird boxes to let air require only several feet of space, robins need circulate. This is especially important for small less than half an acre, while chickadees and nest boxes. Drainage holes are also important. nuthatches usually need several acres. Other Drill at least four 1/4-inch drain holes in the birds, like purple martins and wood ducks, floor of the house. This will help drain moisture don't defend territories. That's why martin that manages to get inside. houses are the "apartment" type. Territories change from year to year, so a Placement well-designed and well-placed nest box will eventually be used if birds you're trying to WHEN: attract are found in your neighborhood. If a Some birds begin courtship and nesting nest box isn't used for some time, birds nesting activities as early as February, but most birds nearby may be defending the area from other select sites from late March through May. This birds of the same species. It may help to set is also the time when most migrating birds out several nest boxes (for certain species) in return to Washington. Nest boxes can be set different places so birds can pick the best site. out as you notice new birds arriving. If you don't want house sparrows or European However, newly made bird houses need starlings to be your next tenants, be sure to to be set out in winter to weather and air out. take down unused houses after the desired To prevent house sparrows and European birds have settled in. starlings from setting up house in them before ..:$�in'v ....a.... n' nvn..'.. ';'.ti..o'3/„r,. ...... ;°..�X ;w... ...o:, n .-': ,. Pest Placing nest boxes four to five feet off the • r jj i1 G•1( ground and in brushy areas will discourage Proofing (� 1, 4 these pests. I • • 1;11 If you want to get rid of house sparrows Natural enemies .1 or European starlings that are nesting in a bird pose the greatest threat �I�I i house, it is legal to remove their nests and to birds using man 1 destroy the eggs. (Unlike most birds, these made boxes. Metal II • I 3 species are not protected by any state or poles used for mounts 1, j 6,1 federal law.) Nests may have to be removed or a sheet metal guard r ; five to six times before sparrows or starlings encircling trees or tllf it finally abandon the house. wooden poles helps ail i it Small animals, like mice, squirrels, bees protect birds from cats and wasps, may also decide to move into a and squirrels. Suspend- t(4, nest box. If you don't want them there, remove ing nest boxes from ■11 the nest to discourage them. wires beyond the :b, When the nesting season is over, open jumping range of these ,jr ,\ an unseamed panel on the nest box and leave predators is also effec- /j// \\�\ it that way throughout the winter. This prevents tive. "ill \ deer mice from using it as a winter home. Perches aren't T"- Otherwise these mice may "defend" their box really needed. If left on • from returning songbirds in the spring by killing a nest box, perches will N and eating them if the birds enter "their" box. attract house sparrows If raccoon are stealing eggs from a nest box, and starlings. The place one or two boards with the proper en- exception might be wood ducks. For them a trance hole drilled in them over the original slab of wood with the bark attached placed hole. This makes a short tunnel into the nest. horizontally under the entrance hole can make The raccoon's arm may still get into the box, landings easier. but it won't be able to bend it down to reach the House sparrows and European starlings eggs or chicks. usually won't nest within ten feet of the ground. Attracting Tips On Birds rata; 1e0 7 • Plant native trees and shrubs for food and shelter " 421- c041 • Avoid using insecticide sprays whenever possible i`?A....i *'_ • Leave grass and bush cuttings for nesting material ..g�;t .a,.s • Provide clean water in shallow, gently sloping containers <. ' V/ • Plant colorful wildflowers that will attract insects for birds to eat • Leave 1-inch to 4-inch lengths of string or yarn for nesting material • Set out chopped apples, raisins, prunes or oranges to entice fruit-eating birds 5. • Facts about Cavity-nesting Birds WOOD DUCK: Inhabits woodland streams and ponds during summer;not common in urban areas. Nest is a bare cavity, lined with down. Lays 8-10 white or creamy eggs. AMERICAN KESTREL: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;not common in urban areas.Nest is a shallow scrape in a cavity. Lays 4-5 mostly-white eggs. Eats rodents and insects. BARN OWL: Uses a variety of habitats. Nest is a shallow hollow in a cavity. Lays 4-7 white eggs. Eats rodents. SCREECH OWL:Widely distributed in forests, parks,orchards and woodlots. Nest is an unlined tree cavity. Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats rodents. NORTHERN FLICKER:Lives in open or sparsely wooded areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Lays 6-8 glossy white eggs. Eats insects, especially ants. HAIRY WOODPECKER: Inhabits mature woodlands, especially deciduous forests;uncommon in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Usually lays 4 glossy white eggs. Eats insects. DOWNY WOODPECKER:Inhabits open woodlands and natural parks; more common than hairy woodpecker in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually in dead wood. Lays 4-5 glossy-white eggs. Eats insects. VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW:Common in urban areas during the summer. Nest is a cup of dry grasses lined with feathers and fine materials placed in a crevice in buildings,old woodpecker holes or bird houses. Lays 4-5 while eggs. Eats flying insects. TREE SWALLOW:Widely distributed in summer, usually near water. Less common than violet-green swallow in urban areas. Nest is a cup of grasses lined with feathers in a natural cavity,old woodpecker hole or a crevice in a building. Lays 4-6 white eggs.Eats flying insects. PURPLE MARTIN:Widely distributed in summer, in past near human settlements,but now rare in the state due to habitat losses and competition from house sparrows and starlings for nest sites. Nest is placed in crevices in rocks, trees or buildings,or in old woodpecker holes.Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. CHESTNUT-BACKED CHICKADEE: Inhabits coniferous forests. Nest is made of moss, with a cup of fur,feathers and fibers. Lays 6-7 white eggs, sometimes speckled. Eats insects in summer,seeds in winter. BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEE: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;common in urban areas. Nest and diet similar to chestnut-backed chickadee. Lays 6-8 white creamy eggs. RED-BREASTED NUTHATCH:Found in mixed forests; not common in urban areas. Nest is a cavity in dead wood, with a cup of grasses, rootlets and fur. Tree resin is smeared around the entrance hole. Lays 5-6 white or creamy eggs, usually speckled. Eats insects and seeds. HOUSE WREN:Widely distributed in areas with shrubby cover;uncommon summer resident in urban areas. Nests in any cavity, including the pockets of pants hanging on a clothesline. Lays 6-8 white, finely speckled eggs. Eats insects. BEWICK'S WREN: Inhabits open woodlands and thickets. Nest is a bulky cup in any cavity. Lays 5-7 white eggs, often speckled. Eats insects. WESTERN BLUEBIRD: Inhabits woodland clearings and open areas; rare in urban areas. Nest is a slight cup in a cavity, made of dry grasses and a few leathers. Lays 4-6 blue eggs.Suffers from loss of habitat and competition for nest sites from starlings. 6. 4 1 N t. IA T 111 at at at `.H„yca ti h N f'to N C L 3 L �'1 �' '^ -8 '87 n o o m E c ?3 0 ° o ° ° m m g 'S '�/ c '" .0 3 3 3 i 2._.a r ^ 3 3 3 y a `L v c $ 7 i v . 2 c o o 8 o rs ' ° t6 a Y Y m n° -` C a v 3 DI 0 45 at d r ` ° c ` 0 .c Z' 3 c o. 0 N 0 a 0 t ., J2 C 6 N .n 0 N U N m ti ` j � X U 0.° C a) C t v v ° rs C a 0 T o a c — rs co m L c E° • U ° a 'D " y o m to v t_ C O` © Ev °c 0 t j " t ° 0 . a d y G ° ° O ° ° 0 L ° a t O u a° ° L o u ° ° m c co C O .0 o — to to co c: d to 0 to ,?3' ° Ed CI a > 2 a a v ° ° C v x ° ... 3 to 4 u 5 u ° ° -8 . .8 rs c a -8 n° . '' m >, v (� n u m CU D cn u N �Sj a a 8 3j d © T ° C0J 5 N 3 a. a a 3 N a 8 8 ° N rs co = z n. if -c 0 0 0 .C -1 c 0 a a - a 5 a O) ? CJ (07 m N to l^ O N T N T M .7-- O N O O d t7 x IL1 e- `. r m C lf) (D .- N (D Q LA rY n N 0 (b .G (') (O • N N Le) to N N • C7 l7 In In N U7 •C C x r• r N , • N r (I r LL) U tD p O N p (° CO N L N. r •• ED ED � O C V T cr, 0)c tl u- c C w ��yy�� Y - 0 L) CO 00 to CO V J o U (I U N to CD N °) G7 L7 N u7 ED LO 1n (D p N (D cj p O c r r •rat m to `,- (° N -- - I� (o D' (O ID CO En L') to (r v'-./v p o ' .c x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Vd ii f'3* C co O tD !n st c ED - O CO CO L'1 In to N V� cry J x 0 0 CJ U !_ O C. Y ,u gym• Cj U y°.. 3 'a 8 U 30 N p n. 4 c C u b N i O D x•Cf1 m 0 3 0° t c m m F LLI rs• 3 > t) U '4 L S ,_co T E a Cu U O w rs a m , m �' C cvi In o o c D 1 W N C E N U y Y - -c G — d m N U 4f y 0.. E N m ro -C a " m D e U L o u 0 )= V Cl) a ca m m 0 a CL = Z a a N I- > 5 3 3 . ' n. :i, y Y '�[-f s i'I t ♦ f �i i I IS . ry R+% a I: v. ,..... may,r > a 'N ry, s, .,5 :f' +,+,���. 5''« 4.'V r M.t ' xx > 'R' 'k`o 4 G�C' iF' £<' Hti ft i �@M y:. 9.'../. �T"� .. �fpc��3ij> f �� iN'.�{,iv,r3J ..t �:' - �.. �.�a':�x. .&�Y'L::�€�'.Y�s Y.Sh�'�&�:.R';a. .2 ..x ..,. ..nx x � 2'.u, �.� i"y . ,...ex.,W..ir2ff O.b �a.C�v�� "%�� ]Entrance Hole Cut-outs Trace on to Wood with carbon paper. - Wrens, chickadee & nuthatches 4. Western Bluebird and Tree Swallow Purple Martin Northern Flicker Cut ott this point American Kestrel after drilling holes Screech Owl and Saw-whet Owl 3.5" 4111Mill° Wood Duck The entrance hole for Violet-green Swallows is an oval shape, 7/8" high and 3.5"wide. A diamond-pattern could also be used with the same dimensions. 3,5' —> 8. References (The) Audubon Society Guide to Attracting Birds by Stephen Kress, 1985. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY. (The) Birdhouse Book by Don McNeil, 1979. Pacific Search Press, 222 Dexter Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109. Building Birdhouse and Feeders by Ed and Stevie Baldwin, 1985. Doubleday and Co, Inc., Garden City, New York, NY. Cavity-Nesting Birds of North American Forests by Scott Virgil et al, 1977. Agriculture Handbook 511, U.S. Forest Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. (The) Complete Book of Birdhouse Construction for Woodworkers by Scott Campbell, 1984. Dover Publications, Inc. New York, NY. (A) Field Guide to Western Birds' Nests by Hal Harrison, 1979. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. Homes for Birds by Daniel Boone, 1979. Conservation Bulletin 14, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Composition, U.S. Government Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. How to Attract, House and Feed Birds by Walter Schultz, 1970. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. How to Control House Sparrows by Don Grussing, 1980. Roseville Publishing House, P.O. Box 8083, Roseville, MN 55113. This urban wildlife publication was funded by the Washington Department of '''-;1 Wildlife's'Nongame Program and Wildlife Education Program, through the sale of person- 1: license plates. I I M Produced by Donna Gleisner• Text by Stephen Penland and Donna Gieisner, Artwork by Nicola Yarbrough 6?-- First printing 1988, 15K; Second printing 1990, 10K; Third printing 1992, 10K Thu V:ashinglon De panmonlD41^.ddlite will provide olrol crc,onunirbs Isnll Washington Department of Wildlife palon0a and existing omfAOyeos whhoul regard la tarn,[rood,Oo1or,sox,sexuaP t uriontsion,religion,age,mmhal status.national origin,disa`rley.or Vietnam Era Veterans status The dcparlrrnnt reco,ros Federal Aid to,fish and wildhle re$10ral:On. 0a,t, Serving Washington's The department lo subject to The VI of the Civil Rights Al 011964 and fh • VI cc 3d ort, tonprogram.l origin to rhandilE tII o y i hasisst �i'ltdtlf8 E111Cf pCOpll-- Section 504 or the Heft ablst.nlon An of 1977,which prohibts discnminafia.On the lid basis or '. rrco,rotor,national origin or handicap. II you believe you have boon d5cnnnnit In an dwarurunt activity,or Iaciht ,or If you warn further tnfornalion about T4b . q ,portunity.U.S.Depantrrent of Intoner, ♦ ` now and in the Wi hh,oton,0 C.20240,or Washington Duponmant of W Irtn,600 Ca,Uol Way N, rs•t ._y. Olyrrpia WA 96501.1091, future '' ECEIvi D FEB 0200g AWN.'IN Mr0C0 4\1°. 9.) REVISED REPORT HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 181 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON DECEMBER 14, 2007 FOR FRED NASON GEOENGINEERS +63:,ti-00;-00 Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan File No. 16338-001-00 December 7, 2007 Prepared for: Fred Nason 61 Portage Way Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 1550 Woodridge Drive SE Port Orchard, Washington 98366 (360) 769-8400 GeoEngineers, Inc. RECEIVED Joseph'0. Callaghan Senior Biologist FEB 2 0 2008 FFERSGN COUNTY(ICD Lisa A. Berntsen, PWS Principal GJA:JOC:LAB:j! ORCH\16\1 6338001\00'Finals\1633800100RevisedHMP R.doc Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright©2007 by GeoEngineers,Inc. All rights reserved. File No.16338-001-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 PROJECT SCOPE 1 BUFFER FUNCTIONS 2 METHODS 2 PAPER INVENTORY 2 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 3 RESULTS 3 PAPER INVENTORY 3 PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 3 Fish 4 Wildlife 5 Shorebirds 5 Rare and Endangered Plants 6 SITE VISIT 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife Species Use 6 DISCUSSION 7 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 7 Water Quality 7 Noise Quality 7 Construction Activities Impacts 7 Occupational Impacts 8 Species Habitat Quality 8 TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 9 MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING 10 CONTINGENCY PLAN 11 CONCLUSIONS 11 LIMITATIONS 11 REFERENCES 12 RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2008 JEFfEHSQN COUNTY BCD File No.16338-001-00 Page i CEOENGINEERS December 14,2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. List of Tables Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting 9 Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting 10 List of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 3. Soil Survey Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A—SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX B—SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPENDIX C— BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN APPENDIC D— PLANTING DETAILS APPENDIX E—SPECIES LISTINGS APPENDIX F—WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS ECEIVE 1) FEB 2 0 2008 JEFFERSON COUNTY BCE File Na 16338-001-00 Page ii GEOENGINEERSO December 14,2007 REPORT ` v % HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN 2O 181 PORTAGE WAY ��"dO/�/► �49 PORT HADLOCK, WASHINGTON � FOR fry, FRED NASON G� INTRODUCTION This report presents the Habitat Management and Buffer Enhancement Plan for an undeveloped lot located at 181 Portage Way in Port Hadlock,Washington(site). The subject property is 0.83 acres in size and is located in northern Jefferson County adjacent to Puget Sound. This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) has been developed as part of an application for site development at the request of Fred Nason (property owner). This report was prepared based on information obtained from site inspections and from the requirements outlined in Title 18 of the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.15.395 Habitat Management Plan and Chapter 18.15.340 Buffer Reduction. PROJECT LOCATION There is only one proposed development property associated with this HMP. This property consists of one parcel (962700108) located to the south of Port Hadlock, Washington in the Northwest 'A of Section 7 of Township 29 North,Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian. The site is located within a Jefferson County designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area along the shoreline of Oak Bay. Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) shows the approximate location of the site. The site is located in the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area and is part of the North Olympic River Basin. Jefferson County has zoned the site as Rural Residential 1:5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development activities proposed for the site include the construction of a single-family residence. The site contains an estuarine wetland that has been identified as a Category I wetland. Jefferson County Code 18.15.340 states that Category I wetlands require a 150-foot setback from the wetland edge. A building setback requirement of five feet from the edge of the buffer is also required for all buildings proposed for construction on the site. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer encompasses the entire portion of the 0.83 acre site that is not wetland. Photographs of the site are located in Appendix A. Buffer averaging is not feasible for this property, since the wetland buffer encompasses the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet in the southwest corner of the property to allow developable footprint for this property as shown in Appendix B. After construction of the single-family residence, invasive species will be removed from the buffer and replanted with native shoreline plants to provide greater buffer functions than the existing buffer. A detailed buffer enhancement plan for the site is presented in Appendix C. PROJECT SCOPE GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) has prepared this HMP to accommodate site development activities. This HMP was completed through research and review of fish and wildlife habitat data as well as through on-site field reconnaissance and a review of preliminary development plans for the site. Site-specific fish and wildlife data was obtained from Jefferson County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS), and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Service. On-site File No.16338-001-00 Page I GEOENGINEERS(7 December 14,2007 documentation of baseline conditions included identifying and documenting marine and upland plant species. This report addresses specific Jefferson County requirements for the preparation and completion of an I-IMP as follows: • Presents detailed maps of the proposed site location, building locations and sizes, existing structures and landscape features, and water bodies. The location of any listed species and their critical habitats are discussed in the text. • Describes the proposed project development in sufficient detail for analysis of the land use change as applicable to fish and wildlife habitat within the vicinity of the site. • Analyzes the effect of the proposed project on potential fish and wildlife species and their associated habitat. • Identifies possible mitigation measures to restore habitat and compensate for modifications to the buffer so that the reduced buffer will provide equal or better protection than the standard larger buffer. These measures include upland enhancement of the buffer with native vegetation as well as invasive species removal. • Prepares a plan that explains how the property owner will avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to fish and wildlife habitats caused by the proposed project. BUFFER FUNCTIONS Shoreline buffers perform many protective functions for associated waterbodies. They provide specific water quality protection through displacement and filtering of pollutants and sediments, shoreline stabilization, thermal cover and temperature moderation for aquatic species and specific habitat features such as food, cover, nesting, perches and wildlife corridors. Site-specific conditions in the buffer including slope, soil, vegetation characteristics (condition and type), and sources of the water quality pollutants directly affect the buffer widths necessary to protect water quality functions (Desbonnet et al. 1994). METHODS PAPER INVENTORY GeoEngineers completed a file review of available information on existing and historic sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species occurring in the vicinity of the project area. This information was obtained from: • the USFWS species list for Jefferson County(USFWS 2005)as shown in Appendix D; • the NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006)as shown in Appendix E; • the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (USFWS 2004), Jefferson County critical areas database(Jefferson County 2007); • the DNR Natural Heritage Program(NHP)(DNR 2006); • the WDFW Priority Habitat and Species(PHS)maps and database(WDFW 2007); RECEl\TE • the WDFW SalmonScape database(WDFW 2003);and FEB 2 0 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Paget JEFFERSO OUNIY BCD December 14,2007 GEOENGINEERS RECEIVED FEB 202008 • the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Eilit11 wail; „L.,3 [USDA] 1975 and 2001). GeoEngineers reviewed the 1991 United States Geological Survey (USGS) map and the 1990 aerial and topographic maps (USGS 1991 and 1990). GeoEngineers also reviewed recent aerial photographs to determine changes in cover and land use practices that have occurred in and around the project area (Google Earth 2007). FIELD RECONNAISSANCE GeoEngineers biologists performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to record observations of fish and wildlife habitat as well as upland and marine plants on and within the vicinity of the site. The weather was cloudy and the temperature was approaching 55°F. Wildlife habitat characteristics of the site were documented as well as direct observations of the physical habitat features (snags, nests, burrows, trails, dens, streams, marine shoreline habitat, etc.). Visual observations of fish, wildlife, tracks and scat were also documented. Vegetation on the site was assessed for general size and abundance and compared with surrounding land uses. Photographs were taken during the investigation to accurately depict the existing condition of the site and are included with this document as Appendix A. RESULTS The results of our literature review and field reconnaissance are presented in the following sections. PAPER INVENTORY The NWI map was used to assist with the overall habitat characterization of the site. Mapped NWI wetland data for the site, as shown in Figure 2, indicates the presence of wetlands along the shoreline of the site on the northwestern boundary. This wetland type is mapped as regularly exposed intertidal emergent/unconsolidated shore. Portage Way is located in between the eastern boundary of the site and the shoreline of Oak Bay. The Oak Bay shoreline is also mapped as wetland and is typed as regularly exposed intertidal aquatic bed/unconsolidated shore. The site contains tidal marsh and coastal beach soil types (Figure 3). The tidal marsh soil type is located on the central and western portion of the site. This soil is very poorly drained and is frequently flooded and ponded. Available water capacity is low and water permeability is moderately low through the most restrictive layer. This soil has a moderately saline horizon within 30 inches of the soil surface. Tidal marsh is identified as a hydric soil on the Hydric Soils List — Washington (USDA 2001). The coastal beach soil type is located on the eastern edge of the site and is associated with Portage Way. It is frequently flooded and never ponded. Vegetation does not grow on coastal beaches and they are subject to continual wave action during high tides and storms. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area do not show a large increase of development in the vicinity of the site (Figure 3). Surrounding land use at the site consists of residential development to the south and west with marine water to the north and east. There is no commercial development within the vicinity of the site and there has been no change in land use in the past 17 years on the site. PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES Information gathered for PHS in the vicinity of the site was taken from the USFWS species list for Jefferson County (USFWS 2005), the WDFW PHS maps (WDFW 2007), SalmonScape database (WDFW 2003)and NOAA salmonid species list for the Puget Sound(NOAA 2006). The DNR NHP was File No.16338-001-00 Page 3 GEOENGINEERLO December 14,2007 • examined for the presence of any rare or sensitive plant species located in the vicinity of the site (DNR 2006). The USFWS species list for Jefferson County was reviewed for listed and proposed endangered and threatened species,critical habitat,candidate species and species of concern for this project. Fish There are no streams containing listed fish species present on the site (WDFW 2007). There is one stream located to the south of the site approximately 400 feet across Portage Way which contains salmonid presence. Our site reconnaissance confirmed the absence of any critical stream features on site. The northern shoreline of the site is exposed to an inlet of Oak Bay which connects to the Puget Sound. This waterbody contains many fish species in the shoreline environment and serves as a migratory corridor for adult salmonids returning to spawning streams. Fish presence is assumed to occur along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Priority anadromous fish species that may occur along the shoreline of the site include chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and bulltrout(Salvelinus confluentus). Chinook Salmon Puget Sound chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act(ESA) as shown in Appendix E. Their current designated critical habitat, within the Puget Sound, is nearshore marine areas. The northern shoreline of the site is located along designated critical habitat marine nearshore areas of the Puget Sound (70 FR 52630-52853). There are no streams containing spawning chinook salmon on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, varying life stages of chinook salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Chum Salmon Chum salmon do not warrant listing under the ESA. However,chum salmon are present in the vicinity of the site for foraging and passage to spawning streams. There is no documented chum habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of chum salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Coho Salmon The Puget Sound coho salmon are listed as a species of concern under the ESA as shown in Appendix E. There is no designated critical habitat for coho salmon. There is no documented coho habitat present on the site. However, coho salmon are documented to occur in the stream located to the south of the site (WDFW 2007). Varying life stages of coho salmon are expected to be present within the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year. Steelhead Puget Sound steelhead are listed as threatened under the ESA (72 FR 26722-26735) as shown in Appendix E. The marine waters within the vicinity of the site are known to contain different life history stages of Puget Sound steelhead at various times of year. There are no steelhead-producing streams within the vicinity of the site (WDFW 2007). However, steelhead migrate through the area and may be found foraging on forage fish in the immediate project vicinity as well as in other habitats identified around the project area throughout the year. Bull Trout Bull trout are currently listed as threatened under the endangered species act as shown in Appendix D. There is no documented bull trout critical habitat on or within the vicinity of the site (70 FR 56212- 56311). It is not likely that bull trout will be found foraging n the shoreline or in the vicinity of the project area. ECEIVFD File Na.16338-001-00 Page 4 0 2n >'•l GEOENGINEER December 14,2007 S JEFFERSON COUNTY GM Forage Fish There is no documented forage fish spawning along the shoreline of the property (WDFW 2007). However, there is documented sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) spawning habitat on the eastern side of Portage Way along the shoreline and along the Portage Canal. The intertidal substrate along the northwestern shoreline of the site is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. Forage fish are typically found in shoreline areas containing fine gravel and sand. Forage fish will not likely spawn along the shoreline of the site but will likely be present in this nearshore marine area of the site during certain times of the year. The presence of forage fish along the shoreline will attract salmonid fish species to forage in this area. Wildlife Wildlife presence and use of the site was evaluated through a thorough review of available literature as well as a site investigation. Sources consulted during the assessment included the USFWS endangered and threatened species list for Jefferson County, Washington (USFWS 2005) (Appendix D) and the WDFW PHS map (2007) of the site and surrounding area. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, but captures the most likely listed species to be present on the site based on habitat type, amount and landscape position. The USFWS identifies several listed species that may occur in Jefferson County. These species include bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus)and northern spotted owls(Strix occidentalis caurina). Bald Eagles The WDFW PHS maps indicate that there are no bald eagles nests present within 1-mile of the site. There are no trees present on site that could be potentially used for perching and nesting. Bald eagles are present in Oak Bay and may be found foraging within the vicinity of the site during certain times of the year. Marbled Murrelet Marbled murrelets are associated with marine environments and old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is also no documented presence of marbled murrelets in the vicinity(WDFW 2007). However,because the site is adjacent to nearshore marine environments, there is potential for foraging marbled murrelets to be present near the site during certain times of the year. Northern Spotted Owl Northern spotted owls are associated with old-growth forests. There is no suitable nesting habitat present near the site. There is no documented presence of northern spotted owls within the vicinity of the site either(WDFW 2007). It is highly unlikely for northern spotted owls to be present within the vicinity of the site. Waterfowl Concentrations There are documented waterfowl concentrations of brants (Branta bernicla), pintails (Anas acuta) and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Waterfowl are also expected to be present along the shoreline of the site during certain times of the year for feeding and resting during migration. Migratory water fowl, such as ducks, geese and swans, are expected to be present within the vicinity of the site. Shorebirds There are documented shorebird concentrations of dunlins (Calidris alpina) and western sandpipers (Calidris mauri) along the shoreline of the site and in Oak Bay(WDFW 2007). Other shorebirds are also expected to be pre gclEt \. ' L .1 a site during certain times of the year for feeding. File No.16338-001-00 FEB 2 0 2008 Pages GEOENGINEERS(7 December 1.4 2007 JEFFERSON CHKIY 1U1 Rare and Endangered Plants No current endangered or threatened plants as listed under the ESA are within the section the proposed development site is locate in as identified on the DNR NHP rare plants list by section(DNR 2006). SITE VISIT GeoEngineers performed a site visit on April 29, 2007 to characterize fish and wildlife habitat on and within the vicinity of the site. The site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any permanent structures. The southwestern boundary of the site is bordered by Portage Way and single-family residences beyond the road. The eastern boundary of the site is also bordered by Portage Way with Oak Bay located to the east of the road. Oak Bay Park, owned by Jefferson County, borders the site to the northeast and an estuary associated with Oak Bay borders the northern boundary of the site. The shoreline is located on the northwestern boundary of the site and is comprised of a stable natural berm. The wetland along the shoreline is comprised of marine vegetation and mud. There are no access trails leading to the shoreline from any portion of the site. Topography on the site is relatively flat with an 8- foot tall wood chip berm separating Oak Bay Park from the site. Neighboring properties within close proximity of the site contain natural berms and rock bulkheads. The eastern side of Portage Way located along Oak Bay Park is lined with an 8-foot rip rap wall. Vegetation The 150-foot wide buffer along from the wetland edge of the site contains a large patch of invasive species and small patches of native vegetation. The invasive species include Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and teasel (Dipsacus fullonum). The native vegetation was primarily composed of red alder(Alnus rubra), Hooker's willow (Salix hookeriana), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) and nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) along the western shoreline and miscellaneous grasses in the eastern portion of the site. There has been no clearing or preparation of the ground for construction. Vegetation to the southwest of the site along the shoreline consisted of a small group of mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees with a scrub shrub layer consisting of Hooker's willow, oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus) and red elderberry(Sambucus racemosa). The marine wetland edge of the site is comprised of marine plant species including seashore saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), fleshy jamea (Jamea carnosa), pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Additional site photographs depicting the site and surrounding land use are located in Appendix A. Wildlife Species Use Vegetation is a major factor in the distribution of wildlife. Plants provide food and shelter against predators and weather, as well as sites for nesting, resting, perching and breeding (Leedy et al. 1984). Due to the disturbed nature of the site, abundance of invasive plant species and the surrounding land use, the site is assumed to not support a variety and abundance of wildlife species. During the site visit, American crows (Corms brachyrhynchos) were observed perching on fence posts located on site. Migratory waterfowl were noted within the vicinity of the site and tracks were observed along the wetland edge. Possible habitat for reptile and amphibian species was also observed to be present in the buffer. Due to the condition of the buffer, wildlife utilization is expected to be relatively low and not very diverse. The seasonal and often secretive habits of many fish and wildlife species make it difficult to confirm habitat use with just one site survey. Therefore,not all wildlife species that utilize the site could be verified by direct observations or signs (tracks,nests,etc) and species utilization of the area is referred to the documented resence within the literature as described above in the PHS. ECEIVED File No.16338-001-00 FEB 2 U 2U08 Page 6 December 14.2007 GEOENGINEERSg JEFFERSON COUNTY CCU DISCUSSION PROPOSED PROJECT A new single-family residence will be built at the site in accordance with current Jefferson County development codes. The proposed residence will be located in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce buffer impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site will be landscaped with natural vegetation to provide wildlife habitat and improve water quality of stormwater. Currently, the 150-foot wetland buffer extends across the entire site. Draft plans for the site have been developed using buffer reduction to reduce portions of the buffer to 69 feet with a five foot building setback. After construction,the buffer will be revegetated and enhanced to provide greater function than the original buffer. Buffers from the southern and eastern shoreline on Oak Bay do not extend past Portage Way, therefore they do not impose any restrictions on the site from that direction. The following sections outline the plan for buffer enhancement and includes a description and plan explaining how the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The following section addresses specific mitigation measures for potential impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed development project. Water Quality An inlet of Oak Bay borders the site to the northeast. The southeastern quarter of the site will be disturbed from the proposed development. The water quality in the immediate vicinity of the shoreline could potentially be impacted from sediment releases from the site during precipitation events or spills. The installation and maintenance of silt fences along the shoreline during construction represent acceptable mitigation measures for potential surface erosion. Additional water quality treatment could consist of the use of sub-surface dispersal trenches for runoff from impervious surfaces following construction. Native vegetation will be planted along the shoreline and throughout the remaining buffer area to reduce the occurrence of erosion and improve water quality leaving the site. Noise Quality Construction activities associated with the proposed development are not expected to have significant noise impacts on the environment around the site. This area is a moderately developed area and existing traffic and noise levels from traffic and maritime vessels are above normal. However, conservation measures will be used to reduce noise impacts to wildlife and neighbors. The use of heavy machinery will be minimized and consolidated as much as possible. An attempt will also be made to organize work requiring heavy machinery into single events. Construction activities will also be limited to normal (8 AM to 5PM)working hours. Construction Activities Impacts The construction of new buildings typically will increase the amount of impervious surfaces on a property. Impermeable surfaces,such as roads, rooftops and driveways,cause additional rain to run off at accelerated rates and less water to infiltrate back into the soil (Leedy and Adams 1984). To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from the building and other impervious surfaces may require a storm water management plan that diverts this runoff away from the ground surface and back into the grou A; ECEgQ TED FEB 2 0 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 7 GEOENGINEERSO. December 14,2007 JEffERSON COUNTY OCR Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be adhered to throughout the project. Appropriate erosion control devices, such as silt fencing, mulch berms, and erosion control matting should be used if needed during all aspects of the project to mitigate potential erosion and runoff. Heavy machinery usage shall be consolidated into the shortest time periods allowable. GeoEngineers also recommends that construction staging be confined to discrete areas of the site to minimize disturbance to surrounding fish and wildlife and their habitat. No construction debris or supplies should be placed in or along the edge of the buffer. Posting buffer signs would serve as an indicator of restricted areas where construction activities would need to be avoided. Coinciding with, or immediately subsequent to the completion of the construction work, the restoration and stabilization of bare ground should occur. Restoration and stabilization activities include the application of a native seed mix and landscape stabilization of any cut and filled areas using native plant species. Occupational Impacts During the occupational phase of the project, residents should be made aware of the responsibility associated with living in close proximity to a shoreline environment. Soil or yard waste must not be dumped anywhere within the shoreline buffer so that it may enter the water. To prevent increased erosion and impacts to water quality, runoff from buildings and other impervious surfaces should be directed to sub-surface trenching that diverts direct runoff away from the ground surface and back into the ground. The occupants of the residence should also promote landscaping with native species. Landscaping characteristics should be built around existing wildlife habitat features such as trees and shrubs. Landscaping around the construction zone should be compatible and blend with the native buffer. Bird boxes should be built or purchased and placed on the property to promote avian wildlife. Bird boxes can be built and placed on live trees according to the bird species requirements that may be most likely to utilize habitat at the site. Species Habitat Quality Due to the disturbed nature of the site, wildlife use is not expected to occur on a regular basis. Animal species that dependent upon small and discreet habitats, such as small rodents and amphibians, may be displaced during construction activities. However, once the project is complete, sufficient habitat will be created for use by many of these species. Existing invasive vegetation(Himalayan blackberry,poison hemlock and stinging nettle)will be removed from the site and replaced with natural vegetation to promote wildlife usage and to improve water quality. Several young native species including red alder, Hooker's willow, Nootka rose and Indian plum are present along the shoreline of the site. Himalayan blackberry has grown around these plants stunting their growth. These plants will be saved during invasive species removal. Included below is a table (Table 1) that identifies native plant species to be used in the mitigation planting plan. Appendix C — Buffer Enhancement Plan and Planting Specifications is the planting plan that identifies the locations of the proposed plant species, planting specifications and schematic, as well as text to identify the ecological characteristic of each species. RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2008 File No 16338-001-00 Page 8 December14,2007 GEOENGINEERS ,if FF RSON COUNTY DC(! Table 1. Native Vegetation Proposed for Mitigation Planting Common Scientific On-Center Estimated Name Name Spacing(feet) Size Number Douglas fir Pseudotsuga 12 1 gallon 17 menziesii Hooker's willow Salix hookeriana 6 1 gallon 45 Thimbleberry Rubus 6 1 gallon 48 parviflorus Nootka Rose Rosa nutkana 6 1 gallon 45 Oceanspray Holodiscus 6 1 gallon 45 discolor Red elderberry Sambucus 12 1 gallon 22 racemosa Indian plum Oemleria 6 1 gallon 44 cerasiformis Sword fern Polystichum 3 Plugs 200 munitum Dune grass Elymus mollis 3 Plugs 240 Plants will be installed according to specifications outlined in Appendix C. A Mulch ring will be placed around the drip line of each plant and soils will be amended if needed. Large woody debris present on site will be retained for use along the edge of the marine wetland to add habitat for birds, small mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Two large logs will be placed along the edge of the natural berm for habitat and also serve as a kayak launch. A trail approximately five feet wide leading to the shoreline will be constructed using wood chips and native grasses to minimize the amount of bare ground exposed. Plants will be placed along the trail edge and the path will resemble a sinusoidal pattern rather than a straight line to the shoreline. This will decrease the rate of flow of stormwater on the path and lessen the break in habitat to the shoreline. Bird boxes will be installed on existing trees and/or on individual pedestals installed within the enhanced buffer. The Site Development Plan in Appendix B illustrates the proposed location of bird boxes. Bird box specifications should follow guidelines established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife located at their website http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/backyard/nest- mat design.htm and the attached publication Nest Boxes for Birds in the WDFW Urban Wildlife Series (Appendix F). TIMING OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The above-recommended planting activities should occur after all construction activities are complete and be timed as follows: 1. Clear invasive species and removal of debris. 2. Conduct the supplemental planting in conjunction with the clearing and removal of debris. This will minimize re-growth of invasive species prior to planting newly opened or cleared areas. Ideally,planting should be conducted in the early spring or late fall during the dormant season. 3. Irrigate newly planted areas during the first summer if conditions are particularly dry. 4. Conduct regular monitoring as described below. RECEIVED File No.16338-001-00 Page 9 GEOENGINEERS December 14,2007r � SIV nUNTY {C[, MONITORING PROGRAM OF PROPOSED MITIGATION PLANTING The success of the proposed mitigation planting project will be judged using a set of performance standards. An as-built report will be developed and submitted to the County within 30 days of plant installation by someone with expertise in native plants. Monitoring of the newly planted buffer area will be conducted by an individual with native plant expertise and will occur every year for three years after installation (for a total of three monitoring events) to determine whether the performance standards are being achieved. Yearly Monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted to the county by October 31 of each monitoring year. GeoEngineers developed several performance standards based upon the specific goals of this project and the conditions of this site (Table 2). The term"recruitment" as used below refers to the establishment of new individuals of a particular species. The recruitment of native species within the newly established buffer area will be recorded but does not have a quantitative goal. Table 2. Performance Standards for Proposed Mitigation Planting Element Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Presence of invasive,exotic,and undesirable species 10% 10% 10% (maximum percent cover) Survival or recruitment of shrub species(minimum percent cover) 90% 80% 80% Survival or recruitment of planted woody vegetation(minimum percent) 100% 80% 80% A biologist or the property owner should implement the following monitoring strategy to assess the performance of the newly enhanced buffer area. • Immediately after planting, two monitoring stations should be established and baseline data will be recorded in the form of an as-built report. A complete photograph record should also be collected. Photographs should be taken from the center of each monitoring station looking in all four cardinal directions. • At approximately the same time of year during the growing season, the following data should be collected at each monitoring station: • Percent cover for both invasive species and other shrub species (grouped together). These cover values should be estimated using a standard transect or point-method technique (using an estimate of percent cover within an 10.8-foot radius circle, • Number of live woody individuals, • Presence of bird and other wildlife, • Photos of the buffer in each of the four directions. • During each monitoring event,other observations about soil condition,the presence of debris, and other notes about the general condition of the buffer should be recorded. • The monitoring event should be documented with a brief memo-style report that summarizes the condition of the buffer with respect to the above performance standards. Any recommendations that would help improve the condition of the buffer should also be noted. RECERTED FEB 202008 File No. 16338-001-00 Page 10 GEOENGINEERSO December 14,2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY OCO CONTINGENCY PLAN There are many circumstances that can contribute to vegetation failure, such as inadequate irrigation, inappropriate soil chemistry, poor soil structure, improper planting techniques, or disease. Use of a regular and thorough monitoring protocol, such as the one described above,will help decrease the extent to which these circumstances will cause irreparable harm. If any monitoring event reveals that the performance standards are not being met, actions such as irrigation, selective replanting, or removal of invasive species should be taken. In some cases, a biologist or Jefferson County personnel may suggest alternate species for re-planting. CONCLUSIONS This HMP describes the current conditions of the property, the possible fish and wildlife use based upon current habitat characteristics and documentation, and minimizing impacts to the environment through conservations measures during construction and in the design of the sites. Key features of the mitigation plan are summarized below: • Enhancing and maintaining wildlife features by maintaining existing native vegetation and installing bird boxes on trees and pedestals; • Conducting the use of heavy machinery in one phase and stabilizing and replanting cut and fill areas coincidentally or immediately following construction; • and enhancement activities; Preservation of native vegetated areas through avoidance a d e a , • Enhancing and restoring the native shoreline vegetation along the shoreline; • Enhancement of shoreline buffer through removal of invasive, diseased, or undesirable species and replanting with native species. By following BMPs and environmental awareness during the construction and occupation phases, and implementing listed mitigation measures, there should be limited impacts to the fish and wildlife and water quality of the Puget Sound and in the immediate vicinity of the site. If implemented as listed above and followed accordingly, the reduced buffer would provide equal or better protection than the larger buffer. LIMITATIONS GeoEngineers has developed this Habitat Management Plan for the property located at 181 Portage Way owned by Fred Nason in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated April 3, 2007. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions express or implied should be understood. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fred Nason and his authorized agents and regulatory agencies following the described methods and information available at the time of the work. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. The information contained herein should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. The applicant is advised to contact all appropriate regulatory agencies (local, state, and federal) prior to design or construction of any development to obtain necessary permits and approvals. ECEIVED File No.16338-001-00 FEB 2 0 2008 Page 11 GEOENGINEERS.g December 14,2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY ON REFERENCES 70 FR 52630-52853. 2005. 50 CFR Part 226. Endangered and Threatened Species;Designation of Critical Habitat for 12 Evolutionary Significant Units of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington,Oregon and Idaho. Federal Register,Vol. 70,No. 170. 70 FR 56212-56311. 2005. 50 CFR Part 17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered and Threatenend and Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout. Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 185. 72 FR 26722-26735. 2007. 50 CFR Part 223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and Threatened Species: Final Listing Determination for Puget Sound Steelhead. Federal Register,Vol. 72,No. 91. Desbonnet,A., P. Pogue,V. Lee, and N.Wolff. 1994. Vegetated Buffers in the Coastal Zone:A Summary Review and Bibliography. Coastal Resources Center, Rhode Island Sea Grant, University of Rhode Island.71pp. Google Earth. 2007. Google Earth Beta v4.0.2722. ©2007 Navteq, Image ©2007 DigitalGlobe and ©2007 Teleatlas. (Accessed April 25,2007) Jefferson County. 2007.jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas. http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/Website/mspub/viewer.htm?mapset=temp esa (Accessed April 25, 2007) Leedy, D. L. and L. W. Adams. 1984. A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management: National Institute for Urban Wildlife,Columbia,Maryland. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. ESA-Status of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/ESA-Salmon-Listings/Salmon-Populations/Index.efm (Accessed April 25,2007) Pojar, J. and MacKinnon, A., et al. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast Washington, Oregon, British Columbia and Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing,Canada. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington. United States Department of Agriculture. 2001. Hydric soils list: Jefferson County Area, Washington. http://www.wa.nres.usda.aov/technical/soils/hydric lists/hydsoi1-wa-631.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. National Wetlands Inventory Mapper. http://wetlandsfws.er.usas aov/wtlnds/launch.htm I (Accessed April 25,2007) RECEIVED FEB 202008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 12 GEOENGINEERs December 14,2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY OCO United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Listed and Proposed Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat; Candidate Species; and Species of Concern in Western Washington as Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office. Jefferson County. Revised December 20,2005. http://www.fws.eov/westwafwo/se/SE List/JEFFERSO.htm (Accessed April 25,2007) United States Geological Survey. 1991.Nordland,Washington; 1:24000,7.5-minute quadrangle. United States Geological Survey. 1990.Aerial photograph. Available online at: http://www.terraserverusa.com (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. SalmonScape. http://wdfw.wa.aov/manning/salmonscape/index.html (Accessed April 25,2007) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2007. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife- Habitats and Species Map in the Vicinity of T29R01E Section 7.April 24,2007. Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2006. Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. Data Current as of August 1,2006. httn://www.dnr.wa.govinhp/contact/wnhTtrs.pdf (Accessed April 25,2007) �CEWWED FEB 2 (1 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page 13 GEOENGINEERSO December 14,2007 VEDStili HD 'd fI +- Ferry St - Ferry St li,- o A a Gtatlola Fd it ;-I I Pc I m a d o Cr $a o a E N '.1 m 4 U 6 Cdr -0 Ra x m 6ep Z Ra a d�a yen �'>);°,5, Fern a Warty-St a f..-, ar { 116' _ -. ....... —Alcohol LoOp Rd-.. Dr )c O I I 9G\d Ftagter Pd Don1aP �a91 Ra. a5‘ er d iFirAve Flagler Ro o f 5'1 m L Site �, cr Site ° 601CB Pand __... , f. IJ(Ii !VET) ___Washington-Le- . .g o` Q FEB ' 0 2008 Oak Rd Jf ffERSO COUNTY OCO Olympic NP E E Vflii 90 2 X 0 2 C00 CO ssss� ssss� W I J F CO 1 G �/�{ i Feel o IrL's y' 'I E, f Mount`Ranigr NP M Vicinity Map m L° Notes: a 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 181 Portage Way H MP a 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers. Inc.can not guarantee the E //�/ accuracy and content of electronic files The master file G EOENGINEERS / /1 Figure 1 o• is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the .rrfi// 0 official record oth this communication. ) 4* le , ,. t ,'fib PSSA , er, } g a ii '� .+. Y poi II E1EhVUSN ` 4$ i ;'. . i` „. .„ ‘. a 1 41. .. .4, .,.,.. of Y .v”fY r' g 7 ✓.v';..''E r tilk '' a , .:.. s eY'``'d «+`� t! F-ZAe'USN- •k„ '..ok t, N '';'t t n 11411410; 4 0 c 'w r., am '' x 4• ', Oak Bay/Puget Sound 1 9 R e Y r n k Jy+ � * d O r . r. x ,r,,.., ,. , T ! � �.J � o- r F a'' '4' . FE B 41 4 r � ® + . `pp if ff R S(T f Wirt r y t, e• - 11 y r N i 11 '. o E p4 1; d ! a .,. 500 0 50'.] N Site Boundary w�iJ E $- Feet 9 $ 1141 Wetlands E, NWI Map No1es 181 Portage Way HMP d 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate. g y ;; 2.This drawing is for infomation purposes. It is intended to Port Hadlock, Washington assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc.can not guarantee the /�,/! o accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file EO E N G I N E E R / // Figure 2 • is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the ��f/ O official record oth this communication. m kzr..:. , ,....., t 6173 0 WI t QJ w 4 g n N 9 N 0 K W \\ M a att 9 K E i Td-Tidal Marsh Site 500 o aoo " €1L it Co-Coastal Beaches .���� w— F g Bk- Belfast silt loam Soils °et �fsJ s CIC-Cathcart gravelly silt loam 1 HuC- Hoypus gravelly loamy sand Soils Map HvC-Hoypus gravelly sandy loam TuC-Tukey gravelly loam 181 Portage Way H M P WhC-Whidbey gravelly sandy�loa ��R� I. Port Hadlock, Washington Notes: 11a llu l c L The locations Mall features shown are approm 2.This drawing is for urOmatlon purposes. It fished • o EO E N G I N E E R g O assist in showing ginees tlIncucan in guarantee attached Figure re .3 tlocumenl. GeoErgineers,Inc.can not guarantee the ift O accuracy and content of electronic files. ti 4 I Its JEFFERSON COUNTY BCD GEOENGINEERS S` I I1 I '/// 'l // /l /1//, / :/// VIP' APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS , ` / 0 , /////,/,/,: 4//////)//i .// 0 , , / / ( \\ 1 i,\\\\ \\., , ,\ \\\,\\\,,,,s,,,--,..-- \ \\,\\\\\\.,‘,\\ ‘'-'- ------- RECEIVE w .._ FEB202008 > ° �fEffEHSON cuU�1y DCO �,�, .. • APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS av s 4 : yy t_`fsRY�t IX�( +,F x x Photograph 1 Photograph 2 Himalayan blackberry in the center of site looking north Western shoreline of the site looking southwest • if 71"ktiif • t.t Y Photograph 3 Photograph 4 Wood chip berm with poison hemlock on the northern portion of Mature vegetation to the west of the site the site RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2008 File No.16338-001-00 Page A-1 GEOENGINEERS December 14,2007 JEFFERSON COUNTY DCD yam.. • rxp Photograph 5 Photograph 6 Eastern portion of the site looking south Portage Way looking south along the eastern edge of the site • a4ti 0 Photograph 7 Photograph 8 Shoreline use to the west of the site Brant concentration north of the site near Portage Canal 1" ECEI[VED FEB 202008 JEFFERSON t(UMIY OCO File No. 16338-001-00 Page A-2 GEOENGINEER December 14,2007 S , . ----:„7-:::•------1-."--,>,... :17,-------=',--------->-,S-. GEOENGINEERS \ N \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ /11/11 I 1 i APPENDIX B 17011014f SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN /10, /Putp/ 1/10/4/11/1? (Ity 7, , ( RECEIVED r E 8 2 0 2006 • . ;:. , ,.cltf Ty Mit ,.t i i.t l',..4, :' ,i,, ' "F 0 . _ » • $ m , i E C. \\ � \ �N. \ \ ! § { n nr z Ill 0 /: 0 - k - cv t {k IS _ _ 0 Qf Z III u_ co- _ % ( E �) z : � 0 \ ��� \ \\ /\ \ aw % mix vi \ i IL | O. §\ 41-@0`� . Vzz ) 7_ 0 ° •3 i | e \ �� . , 474 V N N I1i4)- 4. i•4 �i«\�iii« � _ ' i i�i�«« $)VI ®� � ° ♦ & � I- 4.. \ � `®k §) z %p�% ∎ z ' � \ \\ / ' V. # )$i //( / w �� w ig g § •|| o - / \ !:t\ i RECEIVED / ,/ e, E ) l°ii: ^ ,;;! ! / 7 FEB 2 0 32 \\ } i{ ) /§bSONCONfO\ //I ) gy m, _r OW m000£m_\00\e \FION O I GEOENGINEERS / \\, I if li ////// / Pi A/ //1/ APPENDIX C l BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN �/ ' 7/1 //////iv //t /7/7 0/ ///� " 1/111111 I If It \\ (, ,,,,, ,,,,\\,,,,,,,,,:: ::,:. FEB 202008 \� iffif PISA CM(' bill U EL J 7< a z Q w Y Z S. 0 w 0 w Z a o q m z > m .9 ° > o° w 07 a a rn m g 3 d m Y I!. J C It m N La o s E 0 C°u1 W Z m W w ill. 1,S>.4,� , : o ,6` = t p 9p m W o0 z pf f, -OpS\ (u I'. ASPI4041 I . kill: , 4ritlitAll: Illb 5[ o N As 1 fr 4 ifr70° '..i 0 Iri ,Ili 0 W 1-Z 0 f LU -111)..s.. 4-, -4,4„,„ O 0 E <L,LLI `� rn- W zcn W CO I- F- CO 1 �4 VV Q OZ / w Ez 3 J SbS.,pO p \\�,�� z 3 °g • O p �`� Lil I- C vNi g �£902 F'9141 �,�, C 7 ■ s w < O ��,, Q 41 41 0 m ` 3 ° � m o 0 5 o 1- W 3 ._ o a 0a fly FI : i I ,zg E cF 0 y r r r r = 4 Q d d v .__ - of . VI VI N M O n rn t` N 2 V co N i/1 N • O a O r n A M 9 w m VI w $wo 3 a pass z 3 . g E&m•A JIW/1} (L'KZ mZ� Au) a.-0-- 3 3OQ g 31n a vlss msa Off . I E '°g`g A. flfill N m sQln lmli wwa, aN a ' a�), 4 O 41YZ -,mK WOz (Y W €'c� u U Y H Q 0 Q _ OOO 0-0 mO- Z I 3 y g 000 0m3 w3° _0 2 _w a SZO °�Vi �tnZ �° a 'm E$c a c c 1174 9 RECEIVED �j Y3 O .. 0 E 2 0 1 12'FEB = Z m m '. lY 2 p Zppg LO/6L/LL N1184P5 6.P-00 L 009££9I\Qtl0\00\1009££91\d\1080 J[iIfjSDN COUN1Y DCO GEOENGINEERS \\\ \\� \\ \\ V i i // /// /////14/ / // ft APPENDIX D y //� PLANTING DETAILS !lrl ' 1//1/7////li//,ir / / /1/,1714//rAt/i'' 7 id 1 /pill 4/I/II( \\\.\\,,,N RECEIVED FE8 2 0 2008 JEffERSON COUNTY DCO cc_1 0 DO Z CO _JN a K• Li I-00 a p W ° R cc = J ; a 0 LLw1,i M m K▪ Z QQa fit w o t C O D N Z is d a = 8 4 s w � - X10 _ Q E:41 m° —a Z ILI LM'A 2 C 8 "' ° W o VW ! jjI Z ' O EM OCI) JZ NH < i� WZ IX LLI 0 H Ip N In In gO N a D Z Q',- F.� U C) U U 0 U C) VZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z c4 IO ID <0 (0 M N IO 0N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O O O O O 0 O O C N 0 0' aaa a0 to U Cl C1 U d C07 • •••••• 0) $m •• •• • Q Se S. • • • o c c . • 00 ®o• o ° 9=P k 3 a I • • • • •=So° 2 m ; .s F m i' d ° 0 . 0 • • • • " 2' �s W 8 < P . ••• • •cc • • a I m CEs 4. e x D< g •0 . 06 • • ' ( `" y c m •• O • • O;; m s m2" >° aW; I— 24 W 3 )- EF$m F._m 2 > W O W •) m°ui rn�. ffi o L` W a: . 3 Ld w .J LLLLIQQA 8 m g c„ 7 N m a N a o a o' 2 Q J N < W O J r✓. c= >. J Z Y W Z � m � 0000a FEB2 << ' o1- o ° ° 0e z 02008 !1[II o'8ww o 0 •• • JLfI LI(UUN CLVN! 1 fi'II 303 y $-IV M1 Lo/at/z A118.YP0 6MP-00F008££9I\ova\00\L009££9 L\'d\H0tl0 . . -----------------1>-.>, . .. -"-------",<>•:N GEOENGINEERS5 \\ \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ ,1 1 I i I i ! , , II /I / /1 i 1 ; / il // //t/11// /./Al 7 ', ,, 7/ /hq ^: /i/1,0, APPENDIX ht/Hi/i/ /it SPECIES LISTINGS E - bi Allf/x/ Mg /I ;11/1//, li III Il 11 / I 1 I 1 \\ \ I ,'■, , \,\, ( \\ \\\\\' \\\\<, \,;:\\\\-;,•:.:-, --- R 11:C,HIVE if, ) ,, ! 'riSt'Jr k CIPP un , -__ ----- . , • Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon&Steelhead • Id pace O'der,r' Current Species' Endangered ESA Listing Actions Species Act Under Review Listin Status 1 Snake River • Sockeye(Oneorhy anon j (Oncorhyttchus _2__ Ozette Lake I Threatened nerke) 3 Baker Ricer I Not Warranted 4 Okanogan River Not Wonted 5 j Lake WenatcheeI Not Warranted 6 Quinalt Lake Not Warranted 7 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted 8 Sacramento River Winter-run I Endan.ered Chinook Salmon 9 Upper Columbia River Spring-run Endangered (0.ISharvytscha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run Threatened 11 Snake River Fall-run Threatened 12 Puget Sound • Threatened 13 Lower Columbia Riser Threatened 14 I Upper Willamette River Threatened 15 Central Valley Spring-mn Threatened 16 California Coastal _ Thi�arened 17 - Central Valley Fall and Late Fall-run r _ 18 Upper Klamath-Trinity Rivers Not Warranted 19 Oregon Coast I Not Warranted 20 Washington Coast Nor Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring-run Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 Deschutes River summer/fall-run Not Warranted 25 Central California Coast Endanger,rt� Coho Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northern California Threatened (0.kisutch) 27 Lower Columbia River - Threatened h Critical habitat 28 Oregon Coast Not Warranted - 29 Southwest Washington Undetermined 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia 31 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted Chum Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run Threatened (0.keta) 33 Columbia River Threatened 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Not Warranted j 35 Pacific Coast Not Warranted 36 Southern California Gndau'ered 37 Upper Columbia River Threatened Steelhead 38 Central California Coast Threatened (0.mykttr) 39 South Central California Coast I Threatened 40 Snake River Basin Threatened 41 Lower Columbia River Threatened 42 California Central Valley Threatened 43 Upper Willamette River Threatened 44 Middle Columbia Threatened ru River T teat 45 Northern California Threatened 46 Oregon Coast S-etv it Concern 47 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted _ 111111M • Critical habitat 49 Puget Sound • Protective Regulations 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon 51 Even-year Not Warranted (0.gorbascha) 52 Odd-year I. Not Warranted 1 The ESA defines a"species"to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific salmon,NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Significant Unit,or"ESC,"a"species"under the ESA. For Pacific steelhead,NOAA Fisheries has delineated Distinct Population Segments (DPSs)for considpegQn re Jbr, SA.E D FEB 2 0 2008 JEEFERSDN C11DN1Y DCD GEOENGINEERS //- 2, \ //III /111/1//1/A/4 /////,/ t APPENDIX F �` WDFW, NEST BOXES FOR BIRDS > = e il/I Ill/4 dii ./;:t /1/0/1/1117(fr I / ill i ti11, / l I i lii(I(( �� RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2008 �' i,11u' 14 ilLT jam`R .7.,,,i• ` ' .R`Z` i N. y. 0117• 40 „ ' \ \ ,.11AU 1 'l 01 r io-,..,. �,. "r/•l '1.` !I 11 ��.I.1 �'\t, , t th. .�,,iz�..,._�" '' {� ^ AC g Y. +lw .l .fit• � •A� .� / _.! : lii 7,:f tR.� . 4a�4, N`.N ►+..7411.: a�trail ,f'. .. ' ! rf!'f ,•,.. . ..'� 4ia.Uiiv � N (v.l r,!+'.a I'I. r nor! 1k ' ∎�a I� ' _O, I r".''W1 I IY 1 ' 1.';'611'\k'' 1�r� i ! i. I � � —I _ Y� .i�'� µti) '� 'ii�t/J� � � I ‘ '�. Q�' 41\/� I I � 1 fi�. -__-7 � 'I '� �` � �;,�. n t�, a n.C,�t t' i •t { f �1 'jT l�`'y�, ,''. M d �: , +'�i^x , y�? 1 I' , ' ( 1 r I r+y 4y } 1,1! riy -. K t '� T� ��� ,f`u A?-,.y� .! I 1 r• 1 ( 1 1 I i !I ' . rFp. V �s\ 't •r ;I' �4.te!,:,17',1,... .t ' , , y� $! tI i _ .�"rC,� T \YyR % ri11 y: 1 7 , •l I 'i ! I;t Gr 541 Rri,),(.1 4`' �h i 1 1 , I I ii1 ��I :. :!iw,p\ . ,y ,.:., y'kr�£. �.,., . ii . . 1 rte,.-...-.q"'r... t' ✓ y&"3g I i• I'I' it I� ; I ,- — a . ;nr . '' F. ! .,.� ,,� ,rant.., idi a A ,;:tpol tai..a Urban Wildlife Series RECEIVED Washington Department of Wildlife FEB 202008 _r.• *— __ ' ' ' 'E i T ll 1 J F B __ 0 j HSUN COUNTY BCD As a tree dies, sections of it decay and make up for natural homes that are lost when become hollow. These cavities are dry and too many trees in a bird's habitat are removed. warm, serving as secluded nurseries for many These c :;ty-nesting birds can, in turn, help young birds. In Washington, about 43 different you by ea::no insects that may harm your trees kinds of birds nest in holes in dead or dying and bushes. Being concerned about wildlife trees. 01 these birds, 15 often occur in city also shows good stewardship for our state's parks and around homes. The more common irreplaceable natural resources. ones are chickadees, nuthatches, flickers, l lils publication covers nest box building swallows and wrens. materials: designs, construction and place- Putting up nest boxes can help these ment; pest proofing; tips on attracting birds to cavity-nesting birds. Your artificial nest helps your yard, and facts about cavity-nesters. 2. Materials Design You can buy a bird house through special ENTRANCE HOLE: mail order suppliers, the National Audubon Design and construction of a bird house Society or local need to be bird specific. The most important garden and part of that bird house is the entrance hole. If nursery stores. _ the hole is too small, the desired bird won't be Or you can build able to enter. If it's too big (and this is more one following likely) undesirable wildlife –like house spar- the guidelines J ' ' rows, starlings, squirrels and cats–can get in and plans In this ! and harm or evict the intended bird. publication. 1 `, i�`;� As a rule, house sparrows can't enter a Whether you ; x. Y nest box if the entrance hole is less than 1.25 buy it or build it, ( I y I. ! ; inches in diameter. Starlings can't enter if the here are some �, ` t I 1111 :2i,t hole is less than 1.75 inches in diameter. The important things I lI I -1t, entrance hole sizes in this publication are l ,\, r , . to keep in mind. ,1t 11.! designed to exclude these pests wherever Wood is ' "� I possible. the best material �, to use for bird i ! I j 4I�1 ROOF: houses. It's a III I ` � ( Roofs need f <'. . good insulator, ' to be built with 1 11 f it's available and — enough of a slant , ( I I II Ill/ easy to use, and to shed water. The it blends in well with the landscape. Three- top front edge of the roof should overhang at quarter inch boards are the easiest to work least 3 inches to protect the entrance from with. Soft Wood, such as pine, is fine for driving rain or snow, and to keep cats from smaller nests, but cedar or redwood may be reaching in from above. used for larger boxes. If you use plywood, Provide a hinged side or roof so houses make sure it is exterior grade. A well-con- can be easily checked and cleaned out each structed house should last 10 to 15 years. year. (Annual cleaning reduces the possibility Use galvanized nails to build houses if of spreading parasites and diseases from year necessary, but remember that they loosen up to year.) Hinges should be rust-proof. Duck as wood expands and contracts in extreme and owl box roofs kept shut with a hook and weather conditions. Cedar and redwood nest eye can be opened by raccoons. It's much boxes should probably be made with concrete easier to use paired roofing nails with large coated or ring shank nails. These nails won't heads or duplex nails on the side of the roof allow the boards to loosen up. Screws also and the upper edge of a side. Wiring these work fine. nails together will keep the bird house shut and raccoon-proof. DO NOT use wood treated with green preservative. The green copper-based preservative,when ex- posed to water,can produce poisonous vapors. DO NOT paint, stain or treat box with creosote. DO NOT use tin cans, milk cartons or metal for nests. Metals quickly heat up to lethal temperatures on warm spring and summer days, overheating the eggs arid killing the birds. Commercial plastic wood duck houses are also acceptable but they should be placed in shady locations. I _ 1110/111110/111611111 I. —. — — FEB Z 0 2008 . • JEFFERSONLRUWIYU£ - 3. SIDES AND SEAMS: other species of birds arrive, put netting or wire Natural tree cavities have rough interior over the entrance hole. surfaces that give young birds traction, espe- daily when climbing out of the nest. A bird WHERE: house can mimic this rough surface below the The nest box should be somewhat entrance holes with grooves, cleats, hardware concealed, in partial shade and placed where cloth or a similar surface that can be gripped predators can't get to it. Check to be sure the by the birds feet. birds have an adequate, clear flight path near Don't nail the sides to the top of the the entrance hole. If possible, the entrance floorboard. The sides of a bird house should should face away from the prevailing wind. It enclose the floorboard. This keeps rain from usually helps to put the box on a habitat edge: seeping into the crack between sides and floor between a group of trees and low-growing and then into the nest. Placing the floorboard bushes, or between bushes and an open 1.25 inches above the meadow, lawn or water. bottom of the sides All nest boxes should be firmly attached also keeps moisture ` to a support post or a tree. When attaching a from seeping in from nest box to a live tree, use lag screws and below. washers. These screws can be gradually All seams that loosened as years pass, allowing the tree to won't be open should o grow without any deformities. be water tight. Exterior . o glue or caulking materi- HOW MANY: als work well for this. A good rule of thumb is to allow 1/4-acre between most bird houses. Because most VENTILATION birds are territorial, the average-sized yard will HOLES: probably only hold one nesting pair of a par- At least two 1/4- ticular species. Territory size varies among inch holes should be drilled near the top of the birds—house sparrows and tree swallows right and left sides of all bird boxes to let air require only several feet of space, robins need circulate. This is especially important for small less than half an acre, while chickadees and nest boxes. Drainage holes are also important. nuthatches usually need several acres. Other Drill at least four 1/4-inch drain holes In the birds, like purple martins and wood ducks, floor of the house. This will help drain moisture don't defend territories. That's why martin that manages to get inside. houses are the "apartment" type. Territories change from year to year, so a Placement well-designed and well-placed nest box will eventually be used if birds you're trying to WHEN: attract are found in your neighborhood. If a Some birds begin courtship and nesting nest box isn't used for some time, birds nesting activities as early as February, but most birds nearby may be defending the area from other select sites from late March through May. This birds of the same species. It may help to set is also the time when most migrating birds out several nest boxes (for certain species) in return to Washington. Nest boxes can be set different places so birds can pick the best site. out as you notice new birds arriving. If you don't want house sparrows or European However, newly made bird houses need starlings to be your next tenants, be sure to to be set out in winter to weather and air out. take down unused houses after the desired To prevent house sparrows and European birds-ha ttled„in. starlings from setting up house in them before 1 � V Jr ftii, k^4 L11411011 , 0E2,, ,, I 7 . 4. • Pest - e S t - Placing nest boxes four to five feet off the I? iri ll ground and in brushy areas will discourage Proofing r r, r1 these pests. I I . • 110 If you want to get rid of house sparrows Natural enemies I I or European starlings that are nesting in a bird pose the greatest threat 1't' 11111 house , it is legal to remove their nests and to birds using man- ll� Ili destroy the eggs. (Unlike most birds, these made boxes. Metal l� Li species are not protected by any state or poles used for mounts }, I �p federal law.) Nests may have to be removed or a sheet metal guard r , five to six times before sparrows or starlings encircling trees or ti 1� ' finally abandon the house. wooden poles helps , l i 9 Small animals, like mice, squirrels, bees protect birds from cats and wasps, may also decide to move into a and squirrels. Suspend- lei. nest box. If you don't want them there, remove ing nest boxes from •fr the nest to discourage them. wires beyond the When When the nesting season is over, open jumping range of these ,jr ,\ an unseamed panel on the nest box and leave predators is also effec- f// \\ \ it that way throughout the winter. This prevents tive. "1r 1 \\\' deer mice from using it as a winter home. Perches aren't ' '- Otherwise these mice may "defend" their box really needed. if left on • from returning songbirds in the spring by killing a nest box, perches will hi) and eating them if the birds enter "their" box. attract house sparrows If raccoon are stealing eggs from a nest box, and starlings.The place one or two boards with the proper en- exception might be wood ducks. For them a trance hole drilled in them over the original slab of wood with the bark attached placed hole. This makes a short tunnel into the nest. horizontally under the entrance hole can make The raccoon's arm may still get into the box, landings easier. but it won't be able to bend it down to reach the House sparrows and European starlings eggs or chicks. usually won't nest within ten feet of the ground. 7 ✓��i-4 .14 $. L ' ►i y i1' .may: Tips On Attracting } ' p rmitumnt • Plant native trees and shrubs for food and shelter " =��'.'r''' • Avoid using insecticide sprays whenever possible �.�:,.;1`��;'Q • Leave grass and bush cuttings for nesting material ri �, X04 ,_ • Provide clean water in shallow, gently sloping containers '< . 0 • I'fant colorful wildflowers that will attract insects for birds to eat "' • Leave 1-inch to.4-inch lengths of string or yarn for nesting material • Set out chopped apples, raisins, prunes or oranges to entice fruit-eating birds RECEIVED- __ -- - - FEB 2 0 1008------.__ JEFFERSON COUNTY Ue 5. Facts about Cavity-nesting Birds WOOD DUCK: Inhabits woodland streams and ponds during summer; not common in urban areas. Nest is a bare cavity, lined with down. Lays 8-10 white or creamy eggs. AMERICAN KESTREL: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;not common in urban areas.Nest is a shallow scrape in a cavity. Lays 4-5 mostly-white eggs. Eats rodents and insects. BARN OWL: Uses a variety of habitats. Nest is a shallow hollow in a cavity. Lays 4-7 white eggs. Eats rodents. SCREECH OWL:Widely distributed in forests,parks,orchards and woodlots. Nest is an unlined tree cavity. Lays 4-5 while eggs.'Eats rodents. NORTHERN FLICKER: Lives in open or sparsely wooded areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Lays 6-8 glossy white eggs. Eats insects, especially ants. HAIRY WOODPECKER: Inhabits mature woodlands, especially deciduous forests;uncommon in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually excavated in live wood. Usually lays 4 glossy white eggs. Eats insects. DOWNY WOODPECKER:Inhabits open woodlands and natural parks; more common than hairy woodpecker in urban areas. Nest cavity is usually in dead wood. Lays 4-5 glossy-white eggs. Eats insects. VIOLET-GREEN SWALLOW:Common in urban areas during the summer. Nest is a cup of dry grasses lined with leathers and fine materials placed in a crevice in buildings,old woodpecker holes or bird houses. Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. TREE SWALLOW:Widely distributed in summer, usually near water. Less common than violet-green swallow in urban areas. Nest is a cup of grasses lined with feathers in a natural cavity,old woodpecker hole or a crevice in a building. Lays 4-6 white eggs.Eats flying insects. PURPLE MARTIN:Widely distributed in summer,in past near human settlements,but now rare in the state due to habitat losses and competition from house sparrows and starlings for nest sites. Nest is placed in crevices in rocks, trees or buildings,or in old woodpecker holes.Lays 4-5 white eggs. Eats flying insects. CHESTNUT-BACKED CHICKADEE: Inhabits coniferous forests. Nest is made of moss, with a cup of fur,leathers and fibers. Lays 6-7 white eggs,sometimes speckled. Eats insects in summer,seeds in winter. BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEE: Inhabits open areas with scattered trees;common in urban areas. Nest and diet similar to chestnut-backed chickadee. Lays 6.8 white creamy eggs. RED-BREASTED NUTHATCH:Found in mixed forests; not common in urban areas. Nest is a cavity in dead wood, with a cup of grasses, rootlets and fur. Tree resin is smeared around the entrance hole. Lays 5-6 white or creamy eggs, usually speckled. Eats Insects and seeds. HOUSE WREN:Widely distributed in areas with shrubby cover;uncommon summer resident in urban areas. Nests in any cavity, including the pockets of pants hanging on a clothesline. Lays 6-8 white,finely speckled eggs. Eats insects. BEWICK'S WREN: Inhabits open woodlands and thickets. Nest is a bulky cup in any cavity. Lays 5-7 white eggs, often speckled. Eats insects. WESTERN BLUEBIRD: Inhabits woodland clearings and open areas; rare in urban areas. Nest is a slight cup in a cavity, made of dry grasses and a few feathers.Lays 4-6 blue eggs. Suffers from loss of habitat and competition for nest sites from starlings, RECEIVED f , n 1 J1 Up Ik041TY 1w 6. 1 N N N T /�� ` CT C1 QI L Li H CO h y m y ` E m E •F.J i 47 L 3 = 3 X N j 8 N .+ 4 3 '0 C O O 8 CJ ° E ,9y U v v U -o 3 '- CA Y6 YJ q CS (U m O an m ^ y d Cl c y > O O ° 7 y ' E a. 8 U 8 U- ; O N �j - C 6 G) 0 ,ri O N m 4i '- N d -F, 2 E $ t • ii 10- S E u c C 0 o c o ( c P. . a O O V � - O `n ppCS 0 N C 0 C O ' 0a c C C -p W d w - L O 'O J 0. — O O O O N In N O y rn E m o o ` rs g 0 s E o ° a ° , d E N L ° c N C O w e, co CJ (y N 0 ° n 0 N C N 0 In >, C - -0 �C`) O C 'O X ° -- 3 0 •v A 8 8 8 fi o •O 8 N CC, n CO c a c1 N - E. E. E. '$ ° v' [3 a ›. 0) 0 N 10 O. G a 3 8 w a r7 ° 0 O C co CO c z a a - 0 0 O c m c O a a ca - .c N N tr, o ,n Lo o o m c o CO N (n 11 o I!) Ch r r CA > > 5 C' r r r •-• r C7 r 6 • $ 0 a yC ^ Co Cl.,.._ 4 t. (D N U CO c 10 Lr) m C o N N U N N N CO 47 N U N• N Q N` L C7 t0 • 1- N CO N r r r C') _ U X r r r r C c r W C >0 N O co (N N (O (O rT O O N V O N n r r • co [D W CO �r,pp� _ T N U co C) U CO N CO con G O N U N U CO N C1 N Ot (D W C� CD tD © N (D O O c- _ r •T-4 1{ U N ••)i �' v, co w (D N n co v to co co LO (11 U v /V O .^ '7 C X X X r X X X X X X X X X X X X >< VN LL O ,z C m O (D V C r cn V CO CO CO U U U N 'C U r • C.d J 3 c m n CI ,� C .... a U U 3 v n E 3 c 7 -X C C) O y O rte) S. d D D V en O , o n F C� cn c ., 0 t s 3 o c o iii n 3 U O N . m o.x c , = � C-t d o a a ° N r O w nn ' o u ° - o al o •- co E ro m r a m m o O o Cr., X z ) n. Q co it > .r > ii „r.. } .4 �.+ .a },31.c_ ..`�.y�.IM. ,a`r f '�1.• -.D s' . .-i•.•, • ''o:&L'k�'"A� .:,��..,,. a> '� ¢3 '3`::�, .+RZ } .+�X�ac X;` � v+2�, •.'s2?x..r.,'.�...s%'�"MW' ' • Entrance EJ[o1e Cut-outs Trace on to wood with carbon paper. Wrens, chickadee & nuthatches Western Bluebird and Tree Swallow Purple Martin Northern Flicker Cut off this point American Kestrel after drilling holes Screech Owl and Saw-whet Owl 3.5' hjI Wood Duck The entrance hole for Violet-green Swallows is an oval shape, 7/B" high and 3.5"wide.A diamond-pattern could also be used with the same dimensions. 3.5'- • ■ Il ., ` 8. References {The) Audub.on SQCie_y Guide to Attracting Birds by Stephen Kress, 1985. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY. (The) Birdhouse Book by Don McNeil, 1979. Pacific Search Press, 222 Dexter Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109. Building Birdhouses and Feeders by Ed and Stevie Baldwin, 1985. Doubleday and Co, Inc., Garden City, New York, NY. Cavity-Nesting Birds of North American Forests by Scott Virgil et al, 1977. Agriculture Handbook 511, U.S. Forest Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. (The) Complete Book of Birdhouse Construction for Woodworkers by Scott Campbell, 1984. Dover Publications, Inc. New York, NY. (A) Field Guide to Western Birds' Nests by Hal Harrison, 1979. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA. Homes for Birds by Daniel Boone, 1979. Conservation Bulletin 14, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. For sale by the Superintendent of Composition, U.S. Government Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. How to Attract, House and Feed Birds by Walter Schultz, 1970. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY. How to Control House Sparrows by Don Grussing, 1980. Roseville Publishing House, P.O. Box 8083, Roseville, MN 55113. This urban wildlife publication was funded by the Washington Department of k Wildlife's'Non game Program and Wildlife Education Program,'through the sale ofperson- � alined license plates. JProduced by:Donna Gleisner Text by:Stephen Penland and.Donna Gleisner, Artwork by:Nicola Yarbrough First printing 1988, 15K; Second printing 1990, 10K; Third printing 1992, 10K Tho Washington Depanmunl d Wildlile will provide equal opportunities to a9 T` potential and omisting on loyoes whhout regard to race,creed,mto,,sox,sexual' Washington Department of Wildlife or ienla ion•religion,age,marital status,na;c'nal origin,dsa>Ity,or Vetnam Era Veterans - ----- "-- status.The department receives Federal Aid to,fish andwildldn restoral!on. ►+KUO Serving \Vasliington'S Tho department Is subject to TAIo VI of the Civil Rights .0 of 1904 and ♦ ---- ---- Section 504 of the Reh abilitalion An of 1973,which prubbAS dscrirnention on the basis of Wildlife and Jeo)le--- taco,color,national origin or handicap. II you believe you have been d,rcrimiruted agai�ul g 1 l In any drpartment program.activity,or tack',of II you want Who,Informalion about Tnle VI or Section 501,write to Olitco of Equal Opportunity,U.S.Department of Worm r, 74 g now and in the W:uhington,D.C.20240,or Washington Depannwnt of Wtdlee,400 Gaped Way N, %it otF --- ---- ------' O!yro is WA 90501,1001, future Lot 2 Nason Short Plat Habitat Management Plan And Enhancement Project December 2005 Table of Contents 11 1 1 E Ij V E rr 1 DEC 21 2005 ;= 1.0 Introduction and History 1.1 Site Description 1.2 Delineation Results 1.3 Site Development Plans 2.0 Habitat Management Plan 2.1 Impact Analysis 2.2 Proposed Enhancement Site 2.3 Project Goals and Objectives 3.0 Enhancement Plan 3.1 Habitat and Plant Communities 3.2 Seeding to Stabilize Soils 3.3 Installation, Maintenance, and Irrigation 3.4 Best Management Practices 4.0 Monitoring Plan 4.1 Monitoring Goals 4.2 Monitoring Methodology 4.3 Monitoring Schedule Table 1. Monitoring and Maintenance Schedule 5.0 Performance Standards 6.0 Contingency Plans 7.0 Summary Appendix Table 2. Plants for Enhancement Project Table 3. Seed List Sheet#1 Habitat Management Plan/ Building Envelope Sheet#2 Enhancement Plan I Lot 2 Nason Short Plat Habitat Management Plan And Enhancement Project 110 € C Q ° December 2005 DEC 2 1 2005 1.0 Introduction and History 1.1 Site Description The .83-acre low-bank waterfront parcel is located at the corner of Portage Road and the access road to Oak Bay County Park Campground. The western quarter of the parcel is within an extremely high quality tidal estuary that is associated with Oak Bay and a mapped stream. There is a 3 to 5-foot drop in elevation between the upland and the tidal estuary. Oak Bay is directly across the access road to the campground. On the northern boundary, between the campground and the parcel, is a large mound of wood chips apparently deposited as a barrier. The flat parcel was mowed during the summer of 2005 to remove the dominant cover of invasive non-native Himalayan blackberries. 1.2 Delineation Results A wetland delineation was conducted August 8, 2005 by Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. A high quality Category I tidal wetland was identified and the edge was flagged during the delineation. This wetland will have associated 150-foot buffers. These buffers cover the majority of the site with no building envelope available without buffer reduction. The remaining upland area, which is most likely fill, is dominated by non- native invasive vegetation. The majority of the upland is impacted and has very little habitat value. The only native species identified were on the tidal perimeter and within the estuary. Species identified include salmonberry, Indian plum, elderberry, and willow. This Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project will mitigate potential site impacts. 1.3 Site Development Plans The proposed development includes the building of 3 buildings and a driveway. These building will include a 25' X 30' residence with a satellite bedroom of 20' X20' and a separate residence that is 25' X25'. A single driveway will service both dwellings. Mounded topsoil will be brought to the site to create contours and provide a substrate for planted species. 2.0 Habitat Management Plan 2.1 Impact Analysis The construction process will directly impact approximately over 6,000 square feet (100 feet wide by 60 feet deep), primarily within the 150-foot buffers of the estuary wetland. Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 1 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 ■ To accommodate a building site the buffers will be reduced and non-function buffers will be upgraded with native vegetation. Direct impacts to the tidal wetland will be avoided. Currently the bank along the tidal shore is stable, elevated, and consists of several native species that should be retained. All work in this area should be conducted with extreme care so no sediment or runoff enters the estuary before and after the construction process. The remainder of the site will be mitigated through this Enhancement Project to maximize ecological consideration and sustainability. Impacts to the buffer are unavoidable but will be minimized using best management practices (BMP's) during the construction process as outlined in this report (Enhancement Plan 4.4.) 2.2 Proposed Enhancement Site Habitat Value The tidal estuary is a rich habitat and is home to many species of shore and forest birds as well as semi-urban wildlife species. Currently the site consists of non- native plant species with little habitat value or protection for the estuary. Several eagles, great-blue herons, and shorebirds were observed in the tidal estuary during the site evaluation. 2.3 Project Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives for this project are as follows: • to revegetate the wetland buffers with native species to encourage additional wildlife usage and to create screening; • increase diversity of plant species with appropriate native trees and shrubs; • to remove aggressive non-natives established on site, including Himalayan blackberries and thistle; • to amend soils and reuse the bark pile to mulch planted species; • to provide protective measures during and after the construction process to minimize impacts to wetlands or buffers (BMP's); • to guarantee the success of the project through maintenance and irrigation of planted species; and • to document the success of the project through monito ' ni`o , ----- reports for 5 years). ; 1 L " F j �� E � 4 r ! I° 3.0 Enhancement Plan , DEC 2 1 2005 3.1 Habitat and Plant Communities This Enhancement Project proposes to cover an area of approximately 13,000 square feet between the newly constructed homes and critical areas and roads. Target areas for concentrated enhancement includes the tidal edge, Portage Way, and the campground. The enhancement project will be in accordance to salt-spray and water tolerance of local species. These Enhanced Buffer is indicated in the enclosed Habitat Management Plan Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 2 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 included in the Appendix (Sheet#1). The homeowner will be responsible for landscape plans around the dwelling. All trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants will be planted in communities according to the Enhancement Plan included in the Appendix (Sheet#2). Native species have been chosen according to tolerance to conditions and have proven to have success on nearby restoration project with similar soils types. Other considerations include food value for wildlife and ability to withstand deer grazing. A species list, specification of materials, and nurseries where plants can be purchased is located in the Appendix (Table 2.). This plant list includes 215 trees, 275 shrubs. Specific species include aspen, Douglas fir, red cedar, willow, shore pine, California wax myrtle, elderberry, red-flowering currant, rose. salal and Oregon grape. Smaller shrubs and herbaceous native species can be added once the trees and shrubs are established and the weed layer is completely controlled. Recommended species for future planting include; kinniknnick, coastal strawberry, and gumweed. 3.2 Seeding to Stabilize Soils All areas of exposed soils along the project route will be re se nth h seed mix specified in the Appendix (Table 3.) after the final grading fr e Lor is t i E )7 complete and all trees and shrubs are planted and mulched. i 3.3 Installation, Maintenance, and Irrigation . DEC 2 1 2005 Installation All plant material should come from healthy plants grown in containers as specified. It is desirable to obtain plants that are adapted to this region and propagated in local nurseries. Locations of planted species will be arranged according to the final house plans to preserve views and allow for desired pathways. In general, trees should be planted 8 to10 feet apart and shrubs 3 to 5 feet apart(18" for smaller ground cover shrubs),except for areas shown as a Northwest Hedge. Within the areas shown for a Northwest Hedge trees will be planted 6' apart to create a dense privacy barrier between the dwellings and the roads. Native plant design encourages planting in communities to mimic the natural surroundings, rather than in rows or grids. Installing mulch circles of bark, wood chips, or compost around each tree and shrub is recommended. The circles should be a minimum of 3 feet in diameter and 4" to 6" deep. Mulch circles act to preserve moisture, decrease root competition for water and nutrient from grasses, and help to establish woody specimens. Maintenance The use of appropriate native species ensures that ongoing maintenance is minimized once the plants are established. All new plantings must become established to successfully out-compete aggressive non-native species. In addition to adding planted Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 3 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 species, areas dominated by invasive non-native plants should be controlled or removed. This site has a serious problem with well-established blackberry vines. Irrigation All planted species must be irrigated to augment rainfall during the months of May through September. Trees and shrubs require a minimum of 1 inch of water per week or 2 inches every two weeks. Irrigation must continue for 2 years after final planting is complete to ensure the success of the revegetation project. During the third growing season watering can be less frequent(every 3 weeks) to encourage plant roots to spread out and "hunt" for water supplies. After three years plants should be able to survive with no watering. 3.4 Best Management Practices During and after the construction process Best Management Practices should be implemented as outlined below: Best Management Practices (BMP's) Conservation Practices 1. Avoid or control soil loss and protect water quality from degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, toxins, and sediment; and 2. Avoid or minimize adverse impacts to surface water and ground water flow, and circulation patterns; and 3. Avoid or control the movement of sediment and erosion control caused by land alteration activities; and 4. Avoid or minimize adverse impacts to the chemical, physical. and biological characteristics of critical areas. BMP's are those practices as defined by the State of Washington Department of Agriculture, State of Washington Department of Ecology, State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,Jefferson County conservation district,and other professional organizations. 4.0 Monitoring Plan 4.1 Monitoring Goals DEC 2 1 2005 Monitoring will determine whether the performance standards identified in this — mitigation plan are met. Primary performance standards require survivorship of 80% or greater of all planted species after the five year monitoring period. Another factor evaluated during the monitoring process is overall plant cover, which includes all desirable species, planted and/or volunteer. A project is considered successful if greater than 80% cover consists of desirable species. Desirable species include volunteer native trees and shrubs and native and non-native pasture grasses. Non-desirable species include Scots' broom, reed canarygrass, thistle (both Canadian and bull), and Himalayan blackberry. Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 4 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 ' ill 4.2 Monitoring Methodology Determining Survival Rates Using Monitoring Forms A monitoring form included with this mitigation plan will be used to determine plant survivorship, species density, and general condition of planted species. Quantitative data will be gathered using the monitoring forms to determine the survival rate of tree and shrub species within the appropriate plant communities. This information will determine whether plant survivorship and percent cover provided are sufficient to meet the performance standards specified in this plan. Elements in the monitoring form should include: • plant names (common and scientific), type (tree, shrub) and numbers planted at each site ; (c ,> V T,JJ °� • general condition of planted species (alive, stressed, dead ,, — L. �' `;i • percent survival of trees and shrubs; ;Iii • species to be replaced; DEC 2 1 2005 • contribution of volunteer species; _ • estimate of"desirable"plant species cover and"non desirable"plant species cover, 1 and; • appearance and approximate location of non-native invasive species, which include Himalayan blackberries, reed canarygrass, Scot's broom and Canadian thistle. Documenting Wetland Changes Using Photographs Permanent photopoints will be established during the first monitoring period to document the changes of the vegetation layer over time. Over the course of the 5-year monitoring program, the growth and development of the plant communities should be discernible in the series of photographs. Photographs from all photopoints will be included in the annual reports. 4.3 Monitoring Schedule Monitoring will be conducted by a professional wetland biologist. The monitoring program is to begin after the final planting is complete to ensure that healthy stock is installed. Monitoring will be conducted during the growing season in late July or early August and continue for 5 years. Summary reports will be prepared annually and submitted to Department of Community Development Jefferson County. The reports will consist of a general description and condition evaluation of the planted areas. After the first year of monitoring, revisions to the mitigation plan will be made if the consulting biologist determines that the coverage or success of plantings is not sufficient to serve the functions and values in the wetland buffer. Recommendations will include management or irrigation alterations. Counts will be made of all species that need to be replaced and the location of weed infestations will be noted. The biologist will submit a revision to the mitigation plan for review and approval. All monitoring forms and photographs will be included with the reports. Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 5 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 A sample Monitoring and Maintenance Schedule is outlined below. Table 1. Monitorin. and Maintenance Schedule Fall Spring Fall Spring 11111Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Maintenance 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 Planting ;,.,.,..,...o•.oyoov •.o.oa.33:.;.00.,..,....y.• 0000::o,.,..,,.,.tyr•••••••,•,•e..••. M.:44..:4:•.4.0A.i ♦ .♦'00...+0. . :.. . •♦+:0. .. '00:5"'•N:..:.•d: * :4vOi••:.:.: III_---•O�•0'Pi i':•.v.00•004. Maintenance .W♦0.0• 4 stain.••04.4`. Irrigation * 0•d....0•SO• •.•••••'00.444�.�vv�•Obly.4.•.•.•. Replace plants as needed ""' ..e..•.•. 044•.•.•.•.•r�.•.00bv.;..044440.00M.:::•,g.•.•...• .,. ;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;g;:;1;:;:;:;:.. ;••••••••••••••• ••••ev .M.4• 4•;•v.•..44°0::AM:•:i _ :::::0:::::�:::�:i::::::::i%:::::eee.Q¢.:.2.OD::.e:Q..�.�:}�Q.�.�..9!Q. Monitoring Vegetation and Habitat :::::::::::::::::::::M::::::::$ ..4.::.4• ,•:...•::. •PP00 4! 10:44-v0: y0JPO0A .;.4,4.4;. g g:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::* j4vP.4 :.10i i i:•:•*: k:::::::::::: ..i... .. •• • 000...•.!.4 .l.. •00 �i i:.�i i is e•iee e'i:eE 'OO:a e•4:e �:•:❖:•:•:.:•: •i i:•:•:•i 'i:•:•-•i•: Photopoint 0.K.M.4•e.4•:•vvv.�,.,� '.,.•,.,r::::$ ......4.: .•....... ...•0... i i•:!:M:!:i'imiti itiimi•:-'•.BOOM.�4∎istim;`;..•9 900M:.M 4.•:e:•:• e...e!e�.c..e. .eaae..e.s ._n w ...w. ..• .. .. •.•..n...•.•. 0•••.�M ON.4.•i• •♦ •M0�..4'i 0 i:•v Ob•, :.:4,:•:•:•:•: vv : mow, Annual Report ••••I,a•wvv,:4.v,.;. 4+.1••,- • v..._ NA004.•.4.444::::::� 0.4.4.•0: .•0 !.•. • ;. ♦.,.•�....' *Irrigation May through September; Weeding twice a year Late spring and summer replacement plantings will require weekly irrigation for two to three additional years. 5.0 Performance Standards The proposed length of time for mitigation compliance is five years. This time period will allow for the planted and volunteer species to become established. Survivorship of tree and shrub species is expected to be 80% or greater and will be determined during the monitoring process. The wetland buffer mitigation will be considered successful if 80% or greater of desirable cover is achieved and the plants are healthy and vigorous. 6.0 Contingency Plans The purpose of the contingency plan is to evaluate available alternatives if the Ivy Street Water Main monitoring indicates that the project goal and objectives have not been achieved. Contingency plans will vary depending upon which goals have not been met and will apply to each specific mitigation activity. Appropriate corrective action will be recommended after the first year of the monitoring process and will include the following: • replanting of any dead vegetation in the first year and additional replanting if density goals are not met over the following four years; • increased maintenance, which may include additional watering and/or weeding; • additional protection to re-vegetated areas including fencing and more restricted public access; and/or • additional protection to established buffers to compensate for the length of completion� of mitigation if the density goals are not being met. flF jj L 0 1JI E r • 1 . ', 11 DEC 2 1 2005 1 ,' i Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 6 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 7.0 Summary The subject parcel is almost entirely within the 150-foot buffer assigned to a high quality estuary that is connected to Oak Bay. This Habitat Management Plan, if conducted in conjunction with the Enhancement Project, will allow for a building envelope, compensate for development impacts, and over time improve the buffer that currently consists of invasive non-native blackberries. The proposed project will impact approximately 6,000 square feet of buffer. Development includes the construction of three buildings (house with a satellite bedroom and one separate dwelling) and an access driveway. A building envelope has been designed that would retain the maximum continuous buffer to protect the estuary which should not be reduced to more than 50 feet. The setback for the dwellings from the access road is in concert with the surrounding shoreline residences. Large amounts of fill and topsoil will need to be brought to the site to create planting mounds and privacy barriers. The existing wood chips will need to be distributed after the final planting and will provide beneficial mulch for newly planted species. The Enhancement Project will include revegetation over 13,000 square feet of highly degraded buffer. If the project is conducted as outlined the overall functions and values of this wetland and buffer will be increased. It is critical for the success of this project to have a final inspection after the species are planted and to have ongoing maintenance and monitoring for a minimum of five years. The Enhancement Plan includes planting 215 trees, 275 shrubs and reseeding to stabilize exposed soils. Along Portage Road a northwest hedge, consisting of a high density of native evergreens, will be planted. If I can be of rther assistance please to not hesitate to call. i 4f4/ Dixie Llewellin Principal Biologist, Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc. Certified for Wetland Delineation, 1987 Manual Wetland Training Institute, June 1995 1!1- DEC 2 1 2005 � , Habitat Management Plan and Enhancement Project Nason Short Plat Report File Number 2005-1201 7 Olympic Wetland Resources, Inc 12/05 Lot 2 Nason Short Plat Habitat Management Plan And Enhancement Project Appendix • Table 2. Plants for Enhancement Project Table 3. Seed List Sheet #1 Habitat Management Plan/ Building Envelope Sheet #2 Enhancement Plan d s l+ �' I1 .DEC 2 Y 2005 • I Table 2. Plants for Enhancement Project Scientific Name Common Name Location Condition Size Spacing Quantity Trees Pinus contorta Shore pine edge container 2-5gal 8' 30 Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen upland container 2-5gal 8' 30 Pseudotsuga menziesii* Douglas- fir upland container 2-5gal 8' 80 Salix hookeriana Hooker willow upland container 2-5gal 4' 25 Thuja plicata* Red cedars upland container 2-5gal 10' 50 Trees 215 Shrub Mahonia aquifolium Oregon grape upland container 2gal 18" 20 Gaultheria shallon Salal upland container 2gal 18" 60 Myrica californica California wax-myrtle edge container 2gal 4' 60 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian plum upland container 2gal 4' 20 Ribes sanguineum Red-flowering currant upland ! container 2-5ga1 4' 40 Rosa nutkana Nootka rose edge container 2gal T 50 Sambucus racemosa Elderberry edge container 2gal 4' 25 Shrubs 275 *Trees for Northwest Hedge Table 3. Seed List Scientific Name Common Name Percent Weight Minimum Percent Festuca rubra var. commutata Red fescue 50% 49 Dechampsia cespitosa Tufted hairgrass 25% 24.5 Agrostis lenuis Colonial bentgrass 5% 4.9 Poa compressa Canadian bluegrass 10% 9.8 Tr folium hybridum Alsike clover 10% 9.8 The mix should be applied at a rate of 50 pounds of pure live seed per acre. Native Plant Nurseries Fourth Corner Nurseries,3057 E. Bakerview Road Bellingham WA 98226(360)734-0079 Shore Road Nursery,616 Shore Road Port Angeles, WA 98362(360)457-8482 1 � �,.�. #Sound Native Plants PO. Box 7505 Olympia WA 9807(360)943-7026 , D5 ili; Woodbrook Nursery, 1620 59th Ave. Gig Harbor WA 98335 (206)265-6271 fe Title: Habitat Management Plan kale: Sheet Building Envelope 2.5" = 100' y Olympic Wetland Resources,Inc Lot 2 Nason Short Plat V/- 85650thSheef Port Hadlock, WA 98339 December 2005 #1 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Chem: Barbara Blowers 360 385-6432 P.O. Box 1668 Job#:2005-5553 dixie@cablespeed.com Port Townsend, WA 98368 N Wetland Edge Delineated Oak Bay County Park Corner 8/8/05 post Wood Chips ';4i- �I 4, 9 Enhanced Buffer Oak Bay / Category,I 50' Minimum V Estuary �/ Buffer Reduction / V V V/ mac/ 4 V ry Ac. / ry F 20X Uo 4 7,Bedr•• tc07/ a k cr ° O c h �a �, ��my � Oak Bay isfeg / 'cc / /.2/II�' �ti Portage Road N An Building Envelope , ) E 0 = :� ---100' X60' �' ' 50 Foot Minimum Setback From Estuary " -, �^ 25 Foot Setback From Campground Road DEC 2 1 2005 30 Foot Setback From Portage Road i Title: Scale: Sheet Enhancement Plan 2.5" = 100' '' 4 Olympic Wedand Resources,Inc Lot 2 Nason Short Plat Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Date: ., ' Street -_ December 2005 #2 Port Townsend,WA 98368 them: Barbara Blowers 360 385-6432 P.O. Box 1668 j°11#: d'uie @cablespeed.rom 2005-5553 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Oak Bay County Park Corner post Pine 7q/ Wax Myrtle Oak Bay r ax MyrtA Category) V Elderbe ./ Estuary ' Ro =Aspen ; ".v V Red Curr• t c 4/ �� ���� • -••nGra•-r Ati �� � . Sala! / E f ax lderberry Building Envelope O - \ IX o��/ Rose ° m/O a k V a■i s pen e a Red Curra o % illow,' ,�j Northwest Hedge . Cedars/Firs O ic y - 200 Portage Road A ) c, I.; ll s f` - \ l'- Existing vegetation ' � R 2 2005 V110," Willows, roses, snowberry (also scattered along estuary edge) Retain Existing Native Vegetation Remove all Blackberries Before Planting Amend and Import Topsoils Redistribute Wood Chips As Mulch For Trees and Shrubs Tress and Shrubs Can Be Arranged to Accommodate Views 1 �,�SOx co JEFFERSON COUNTY �� , , ,� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT h gQ 621 Sheridan Street -1/4.0 Port Townsend, WA 983' Al Scalf, Director January 30, 2006 BARBARA BLOWERS PO BOX 1668 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 181 PORTAGE WAY CASE #: MLA05-00737 Dear BARBARA BLOWERS: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. 1) The following comments were received from Linda Atkins, Jefferson County Environmental Health: "I revisited the site 1/20/06 and found unsuitable conditions in all but 2 holes, the ones furthest east. They will need to contact the designer/engineer to discuss options. Possibly curtain drain, other holes. etc. The proposed onsite sewage area will need to be staked prior to approval since they are proposing 2 residences and the satellite bedroom and an easement that will account for these changes will also be necessary. A reinspection fee ($127.00) is required to verify any new areas they propose and checking the staked area." Please work with your septic designer/engineer and with Linda Atkins on the above. 2) Comments from Randi Thurston from the Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife are attached. Please contact your wetland biologist and address her comments. In the e-mail dated January 13, 2006 (3:09 p.m.) Ms. Thurston asks if a reduction in road setback is possible. Table 6-1 (Jefferson County Code 18.30) allows for flexibility with the road setback. A reduction in road setback may be approved in this case if it provides an increase in wetland buffer. 3) In an addendum to the wetland delineation have your wetland biologist address the impact of the septic line within the wetland buffer and recommend mitigation. 3) Provide a revised site plan showing: a) Label the building envelope and show it meeting a front/road setback(currently the building envelope is shown up to the property line) b) Driveway c) Septic line Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 • Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by April 30, 2006. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90) calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, i Dement of Corn pity Development Staff c: File Jefferson County Environmental Health -L YJA A}j(,i'n FRED P NASON TGir1c. 'Royer —1odiocic ee,e- ah T z kta an Ong neer,:t5 1e. — of yrnpi c. i U Hand Resavnes Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Sunday,January 22, 2006 8:59 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: mla05-737 Nason Zoe, I revisited the site 1/20/06 and found unsuitable conditions in all but 2 holes, the ones furthest east. They will need to contact the designer/engineer to discuss options. Possibly curtain drain, other holes. etc. The proposed onsite sewage area will need to be staked prior to approval since they are proposing 2 residences and the satelite bedroom and an easement that will account for these changes will also be necessary. A reinspection fee is required to verify any new areas they propose and checking the staked area. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always warping for a safer and healthier yefferson County 1 'age 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Randi Thurston [thursrlt @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:09 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Habitat Management Plan for Lot 2 Nason Short Rat Zoe, I'm leaving for a two week vacation tomorrow and the comment period for this document expires while I'm gone. I apologize for e-mailing my response but the emergencies from the rain have me working overtime just to issue HPAs with deadlines in the next two weeks. My main concern with the proposal is with the size of the building envelop. It seems that a smaller more compact residence could be constructed to provide a larger buffer for the wetland. While removal of invasive species and replanting with natives, if properly maintained, will help improve the habitat function and value, area should also be a major consideration. As I stated in my previous letter, science has shown that a 50-foot wide buffer, even one in a relatively natural condition, isn't adequate to protect many wetland functions especially for wildlife. In addition to a smaller envelop, could a variance from the road set backs be obtained to provide additional buffer? 1/13/2006 Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Randi Thurston [thursrlt @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:35 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Fw: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel Previous correspondence. Original Message---- From: Randi Thurston To: dixie(a�cablespeed.com Cc: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:33 PM Subject: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel Recommended wetland buffers were established based on a review of Best Available Science (BAS)to protect the functions and values of wetlands. As a result of the BAS review, a 150—foot buffer width is currently required for Category 1 wetlands in Jefferson County's Critical Areas Ordinance. An ecotone or edge is a place where two different plant communities meet. This junction is either a boundary or transition zone where plant and associated wildlife communities interface. The buffer around the wetland is the bridge between the upland habitat and the aquatic environment. The ability of the areas to attract and support wildlife is dependent on the structural and functional integrity of the three interrelated ecosystems: aquatic, riparian, and upland not just to the wetland itself. Both Best Available Science for recommended buffer widths for Category 1 wetlands and riparian functions in marine ecosystems indicate much larger buffers than 50 feet are needed to protect wetland/riparian function which include fish and wildlife habitat. In 1997, WDFW published Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Nearly 1,500 pieces of literature on the importance of riparian areas to fish and wildlife were evaluated, and land use recommendations designed to accommodate riparian-associated fish and wildlife were developed. Although the document focused on lotic systems,the attributes that contribute to the diversity and abundance of terrestrial wildlife in marine riparian areas are the same as those for lotic systems and include: • structural complexity; • connectivity with other ecosystems; • abundant food source and available water; • moist and moderate climate. WDFW Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats: Riparian published December 1997 summarizes the riparian habitat functions or specific wildlife uses, organized by riparian habitat width. Many of the riparian habitat functions/parameters are applicable to subject property. Appendix C (attached) from the document, gives the riparian habitat function and the recommended buffer, associated with that function along with the source document. The recommended buffer in almost all cases far exceeds the 50-foot buffer proposed. Buffer widths needed to protect wildlife using wetlands generally range from 100 to 600 feet or more. As you pointed out the subject property is obviously a disturbed site. Land clearing and filling is often an avenue for expansion of non-native invasive plant species which colonize disturbed areas. Non-native invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry in the case of this site and Japanese knotweed out-compete native plants and displace wildlife associated with those native plant communities. Land clearing and filling also results in a loss of structural diversity (multiple canopy layers, and a well developed shrub layer)that provides nesting, breeding, and hiding cover and food for wildlife. Pesticides and fertilizers used for residential application and sedimentation from land clearing can impact water quality in the wetland. In addition, land clearing alters the microclimate. 1/17/2006 Page 2 of 2 Likely impacts that will result from home construction include increased noise and light that will affect wildlife usage and increased amounts of surface water runoff that may increase the risk of flooding and change the salinity of the wetland and thus plant communities and the associated wildlife will be impacted. In addition, the loss of a safe corridor for wildlife to move from area to area, this is especially important in areas where development has made upland travel routes unavailable, discontinuous, or life endangering. Much of the landward side of the estuary has single-family homes and a roadway aligns the shoreline. WDFW has identified marine/estuarine shorelines as a priority habitat in part due to comparatively high density and diversity of wildlife species, important wildlife seasonal ranges, limited availability, high vulnerability to habitat alternation and dependent species (WDFW 2004). Of the 331 terrestrial wildlife species known to inhabit King County, Washington, 263 wildlife species (are known or expected to have associations with marine riparian habitats including 9 amphibian species; 5 reptile species; 193 bird species; and 45 mammal species (Brennan and Culverwell 2004 attached). Since Jefferson County also lies within the Puget Sound lowland, the wildlife species are similar to those in King County. Just in the short time I was at the site, I observed Great-blue heron, migrating waterfowl and evidence of raccoon and river otter usage of the site. The WDFW priority and species map show waterfowl and shorebird concentrations using the estuary. In addition,juvenile salmonids migrating from the nearby fish bearing stream likely use the estuary for feeding and rearing when they emerge from the stream. In addition, recent research on estuaries show that juveniles salmonids from other areas will feed and rear in estuaries along their mitigation route to the ocean. WDFW recommends subject property acquired by the local land trust and preserved as open space and we are willing to look for funding. However, if the owner is unwilling to allow acquisition of the property as open space, WDFW understands the difficulty in denying use of the property to protect a critical area even when it is among the remaining functioning Category 1 wetlands connected to Puget Sound. WDFW recommends the smallest development that will allow reasonable use for subject property be permitted and thus hopefully result in a larger buffer than the proposed 50 feet. An example would be a very small dwelling such a cabin or placement of a small park model manufactured home onsite. In addition, non-native vegetation in the buffer should be removed and native plants should be planted and maintained to ensure survival. The native plant species should be selected based a nearby relatively undisturbed reference site with similar physical attributes to the subject property. In addition to minimizing the building envelop, other measures such as requiring the residence to be designed such that interior lights will be directed away from the wetland, routing all new, untreated runoff away from the wetland, establishing covenants to limit the use of pesticides and fertilizers within 150 feet of the wetland, retrofitting stormwater detention and treatment for road and driveways,preventing channeled flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer, and require the planting of dense native(i.e. Nooka rose)hedge to delineate the wetland buffer edge. 1/17/2006 Habitat Management Plan I sad& Ishit \-, In Olympic Woad Resources,limj Building Envelope 2.5" = 100' ' 1 Lot 2 Nason Short Nat L . Port Hadlock,WA 98339 i -,..7 g 856 50th Street ------ - December 2005 I #1 Port Townsand,WA 98368 fat Barbara Blowers . lf 368385402 I P Box 1668 I '14#:2005-5553 ' dizie@mbiespeedam i Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 1 , Wetland Edge Delineated Oak Bay County Park Corner orner N\ post IF N. , 1;' .. ," ■ '._,,,16,,,,,:4,- , ----,,— / \ S.? ---1—\a___ _m-- ----'-- \ 'f s \ \° '—' / 1 I/ A .., \, Enhanced Buffer / / , Oak Bay / i f Category I \i, Estuary 4 50' Minimum '- , /// Buffer Reduction 4 -\\ , , ,'- i / . ' 7 / 11(.' / N\ \ c.,,, ,/ t i ' / 20X1 77 /16)/ / / / , 1843dt:on! f V \i \ / ji) At Sty N 4s... \i .N. / CV 44;1.'96 Oak Bay 41//NN / / \* ______ —— /47.'i / - i , / et' / / '' . i ... ii:'' / / i at 2 200' L — ' / / / Portage Road ___./ / / 1 / St* Building Envelope H-1,—, ,ir fr,-- { c irti7„N- r.',. t x —1 00` X 60' fi ...... -----' — 50 Foot Minimum Setback From Estuary i i, \ , I i' J, i 25 Foot Setback From Campground Road ' DEC 2 1 2005 1` .- 30 Foot Setback From Portage Road I I 1 December 26, 2006 From: Fred P. Nason To: Jefferson County Department of Community Development Subj: S.P.A.A.D. Done on Nason Short Plat, Lot #2, Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA. 1. I hereby authorize Tanya Royer and Nancy Wolfenden, representing Hadlock Reality, access to any and all information pertaining to subject S.P.A.A.D. re. P. Nason ?F(2$o& 1I- RE19rz EctNTipnL (TV") \ DEC % 9 �ttt��uN�,�111N`V til'►1■ T Ik) V Iv` t ON T+ 2 E7 4, 6\--) .X! B Nom, C O b %" � a0 w < ?� w k VG a ,'.cs? l` ,k) , ------- F 0' ..i..—I cil ; P — d fn i ...: F.-- ,i. - 1 r F 300 q D O N r O f N _- 3 0 .3 N 40 I —*J ve' 0°m0a '0 mNOz 'f# i E co N co 'µtiff tr r%s w O CO i re. 33 JEFFERSON COUNTY 7 006� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT in 1110 c 621 Sheridan Street � Port Townsend, WA 98368 `S /INGI" December 22, 2005 Al SCdlf, Director Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Sight Plan Advance Determination Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within 2..4, (2. calendar days or by January0 2006. If no written response has been received withinT S (7.4r days,your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact Z NISWONGER at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Z NISWONGER .g c: Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 JEFFERSON COUNTY V DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I 621 Sheridan Street O Port Townsend, WA 98368 1`4�NOZ Al Scalf, Director December 22, 2005 FRED P NASON DONA O NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 RE: SITE ADDRESS: PORTAGE WAY MLA#: MLA05-00737 Dear FRED P NASON: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of CommunittDevelopment Staff c: File Building Permits/ Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 December 22, 2005 FRED P NASON DONA O NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 RE: SITE ADDRESS: PORTAGE WAY MLA#: MLA05-00737 Dear FRED P NASON: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, /// cee1 .e'c Department of Communitnevelopment Staff c: File December 22, 2005 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA05-00737 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Sight Plan Advance Determination Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108, Nason Short Plat .83 Ac, Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, Located on Portage Way, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Comments must be received within fourteen (14)calendar days or by January 5,2006. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact Z NISWONGER at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Z NISWONGER c: Map Output Page 1 of 1 Nason - 962700108 - Features Not Surveyed 96270039i _ _962/C0097 1' 'Ali• lL--- . 962700113 ■ ------ 962700112 . . (4)j ! (-- , , ..i 962700111 962700110 ... Legend ,.. 0 Selected Features it- Road System 3:. rj Parcets-H ,. 962700107 Priority Habitats and / Species / Boundaries ---_ II ..0.15-scrt COlry —"'-'--...,,,....„.......... —7, 1% 1 Om Costes c‘ 1P 980103001 S ‘, &1.:0x2 ----- i / 9984(XXX.13 \ , 998400016› ...- ,,. \ 960300003 ..-- , ,. ! , 7....--P".998400004 :\ \ i 992400815 4 99E4000' 14r \ C464C.3°°5 1 96°3°"4 I - 998400313 ---- 11 / Maps proodsi try retter-rcr f..tarty Cyrirat&rocas GIS / --.1 •`Mt ,. , • , FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Dec 22 14:06:54 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esriesrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 12/22/2005 TRANSMITTAL REPORT aki � • z r%W a 4,,,,',., J Z Q ♦— • _,.. . ill 4 — ----rzci y +g z N 1 . O Y ' 1 U 4- l t .. 1 isi a DEC 2 I wog • ill H �` .4%, J s O Ztt 0 O } U) m k' CC 0 z w &r W w ° > --,. P w '1,, 0 w Li- w w moo . F �ffi } arm y X7d04B0dM4 4 ,, ,.}n U gg 14301,. .; I 4 m°r O 11 d .k' i sus+ :�ati F i t"�' ,444-",:,,,,‘ t 1 ,c, lr p M 2. S} r. r t',,. C n'.. "'� 4� I, p d I t k Ir�Y. 1!. 2 11 'jb :iF ;r t r c I FYI i r� v. i A° —i^T �, ' �,} f' •- ,14..' \ < •V‘ v .\ c r�j ��II��I�IIII��IIktltjl��i�i�l(�i��i%y%u�iiNpi ' T i r '� r a A{"c; )y�� ix i�v\ 1����i1/1�1 4,11"4 l/�' Viny r r 4 a1 t o x l'a��'k g dl' .�, ' r o Vt , rr - ,;4 ,� @'', ') �\i\.F. /40 i k 5 � 4,� t}',f y� , ,,, t '00,4/'r` , P`,`a ` 1''t1 � r ,;,"41/1 4 /' � / r, \', ��r4r Li 1 �laiC�� r, a rk" °.p H/'r +�� 1 d r'r 1, rr !t I�{�rf,I I'1 P 1)'�dn4'�N , ✓.. , I �',l�' ' It n�it , V 1 r t. ��I�I'll�'I��tll��/nl'li���l���1/Su�i s `°yl/� , 4j/r�i 7 i. ,:4,t",,,'Vit'` ti� jp y} n yO �P . — "t tx 1j "I"'" I "I. �, fie M' r 1� t } f , c xs f 'jf; t 't� ,, '� tr� -_11' +# 1° <q,��1�ttF :�'� �1 /2=--- !�,T �1 '` ray n a f it \AT! r„,^„:-,i i- iE,t 't O cw , s1 IS (1DPA ZyP In ,n ,� , 4 aa�QpPpr t fl,� { I,ill/ � ,1„-� .te�” I. 9n U� ': a. x ,/' APPLICATION FOR PERMIT Jefferson County Permit# Department of Community Development .. Receipt# 621 Sheridan Street i �� Check# t a Port Townsend,WA 98368 t��---- -- ; , Date Paid 2-12705 (360) 379-4450 or 1-800-831-2678 1 � I Fee ,/ Al APPLICANT PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE A J SRl1ATI• 1 -CI ECKiBOXES THAT APPLY Road Approach Road Approach Permit&Address 1 [] General Permit 0 Utility Class A El Utility Class B El Yearly Class A Fee: 20%of Class B j) County Road Name: 1,L-la-(r Mile Post#: f t (office use only) Intended use of County Right-of-Way is to construct,operate and maintain a: -, -t,44)6 V-4"/ '-'_L, , kA /i%.4- .M1A . A 4-e I hereby designate /,, f App cant(Owner,Utility, or Authorized Representative.) to act as my agent lated to this ;' * .lip on fo MaRing Add ress -ApOicant Signature Date ity-State-Zip Code Parcel Number 6 ,, .. fl Telephone No. Flaggg Color Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS By signing the application form,the applicant attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge and agrees to all conditions on the permit. I also certify that this application Is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgment,court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and expenses which may In any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later Inspection. This right of entry shall expire when the County concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours_ The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take`of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal taw known as the"Endangered Species Act`or`ESA` Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any Individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regardingyour actions)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County Development Code The Applicant acknowledgees that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsibility fqr adherin to and complying with the ESA. The-ifpplic nt has read this and signs and dates it below. (/ ', `-(A CANTVORyALJTNfORRED EPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO JEFFERSON COUNTY Updated 12/19/01 ADDRESS REQUEST JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 Sheridan,Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)379:74159,, ,-- APPLICANT: Please fill out item 1 through 8. Fee as per Jeffersan'C 6 .1 `a 1. New Address • Correction • Change ■Review DIFF LEFT M.P. RIGHT 1 DOFF DEC 2 12UU5 J 2. Applicant Name: .j ( C 3. Mailing Address: ( frJi� d C`e (,(-)4/ Town/State/Zip d'( r u;`(d 6( iJ . 4. Telephone: Work 3 c —L (166 Home: 5. Location: Attach a Detailed Drawing or Map. Additional Fees May Be Required if More Than One Site Visit Is Necessary *******PLEASE FLAG YOUR DRIVEWAY.******* Date Flagged:)Z/ 16/ 0.-C Flagging Color VI/161A),Nine Digit Tax Parcel Number vC -) /(j V Plat Name/46 G V[ .S( Block Lot 6. Road Name: 16 ,� LA Is this a PRIVATE o COU .1 road C utcLE ONE Nearest Cross Road: _ 4 V ) ""'" I 7. Neighbors'Address if Known:, Name/Address: (Q7I r�u Name/Address: 8. Da You Need To Construct a Driveway? YEs or NO CIRCLE ONE FIELD NOTES 9. Was This miffed With A Building Permit? YES or CIRCLE ONE SHADED AREAS OFFICE USE ONLY New Address: Postal District: Real Milepost: Road#: Left Right Fire District Building Permit# Plate Sent / / Or g Odd Even Date Paid IX I 1()r)Check# I+ Receipt# ''6111 Date in Computer / / IS 9SFlING'CG JEFFERSON COUNTf PDEE 21 2005 [.,,�, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director Letter of Representation When an applicant for a permit is not the owner of the property it is necessary for the property owner to submit a letter of representation. The letter needs to have the owner's original signature. An example is below: Date To Whom It May Concern: I, John Doe, owner of 123 Fir Street, Parcel # 123-456-789, give permission to Tom Sawyer to apply for a permit on the above referenced property. Sincerely, Date f///0/0 -5— To Whom/It May Concern: i/e /l/G� I, S4r1 , owner of [Of d. nasoil s. P. , (prope owner's name) (address or legal description) Parcel # 1 vz, qv() 108 , give permission to ,..tA wi.r.A, "-'' kyrAlaAs , (parcel number) (applicant's name) to apply for a ,.- P14ii4D permit from Jefferson County on the above (type of permit) referenced property. Sincerely, //ii P at-ix)-\ ..... Budding Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 G\PermitCenter\FORMS\Letter of Representation.doc 0 CM a (0 m N _ _ p V. 2,_o C ` m m m 0 WI LC- g m m m a J a � od � x aEYO nm am !'/ ° `� 0>a) � of C]+e :. > o o m o y o o ED_ Q m Q as ° a% co n Q m m o m o m :11 ii ar w m m � of c E { CL ° E av Ea 1(1=1 m c Q m m 06 ami CD m w m ° N ,- O` C E o-cE m E ED ..--2 � ^' y Co m `o m -° c a E N E E CL•--•• N E 7 (= co O o T O p iO a a m m - O` W m > C ■1 C > C m Wa i Q ao Q w 0 Co �� m W > 0 LO m o r o .0 Lm i E. -_.,-- C a y m mWcr 0E 4, as .0 C -C m 6 U a 0 Qv d uW m o m c 40 m m C.) C 0. 2 Q W s._ — as 7 N .. T 13 CD m o E m E m m C 76 E c c: CO m . . m mom m E — m 2r. Q ass ,_CO m C w '.,. -n ` CO -m 0 m O C m o c:._. N or L m0 m T - a O O o N.. 3 ,c.1.1 o N w m O �- O O m ►c. .+ c� c6 a, U S.L a c0 .y-. a (6 .� O N O 03 C)1 N, r-ci as 1\VVII Y! C co •C m - a t0 m \ U N O m In O .m O m O m p O> U 0 Q dM m a m Q- Z Q.1- a�O U O U eO . V- N a Q r Q lO L' 2 a ;; mm � E0. - m o a .0 � a arc E E 0 to I1 .... m O 7 L > C CO C -al- -0� o -ic co m o O o I E � � E � � o 01- 013E_ C'1 m ° N � co m 0 � m m _o Q_03o-_=_ mom m mU m � mm � � � ca Q cc Q � m Q � as a CO Z cU a cv Co as RS m o O 7 C c a 7 .00 Y m .Q .a _o O C Q 0 i U m N .O m L a 2 2 2 2 m E fa m U o E °- fl Q CO a o 'j v O E E E E Q m 2 2 2 E E m ° m m lii m m Y p O m m _ N m as m ,-......_g C W a r N LO LC) O n O n co 5 A cl h 0 c� o H H H E-+ H � U p m g CD a Q s. o cn F- L up ' 4 ON---c. f , ps JEFFERSON COUNTY �Wt� �' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t "4 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 9836$.. �� 360/379-4450 3601379-4451 Fax II i (57 Z' ' p$ www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment --' i`VBINpc , I • Master Permit Application " DEC 2 1 2005 'I MLA: 0 — i 1 Project Description (include separate sheets as necessary): l Tax Parcel f n Property a fin;}, Number: %6 . ) 0 6 /0 Sr%5 Size: o (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Pr�erty: G li A"--/ 19Y' ltd Property Owner(s)of Record: ' - i �&"- i" c 5 d Telephone: ,)k-c-'6-' 4 ( Cs) Fax: 3- c—' 0 A email: . Mailing Address: / J jj2J J / 147 . �', ___,',5 Applicant/Agent(if different from own�f): 'd l ,Oli ref-- 6/(1 (.0.2.- `, Telephone: .: , ----`—�'3 6 0 Fax: - ,g S"7 6 email: o.;a yi c0? '/y kl1Q . it• Mailing Address: f t' 0 G What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies) Li Building ❑Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) 0 Demolition Permit ❑ Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C]" U Single Family ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Garage Attached/Detached U Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)" U Manufactured Home 0 Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Modular U Short Plat" U Commercial* ❑ Binding Site Plan" D Change of Use U Long Plat" 0 Address r1 Road Approach U Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments" o Propane n Plat Vacation/Alteration" ❑Allowed"Yes" Use Consistency Analysis U Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions'"` i Stormwater Management C Shoreline Management Substantial Development'* . ite Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)• ❑ Shoreline Management Variance 77- ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium May require a Pre–Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: • .4i DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate /� - _ .J�i� <� to act as my agent in matters relating to this ap lication for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE • _ r , Date: / - 2-u a 4 By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide acce and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any r red later ssppections.Access rig3h f. ntry to this property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. �C ��' 6 / V /�� Signature: (�'1 11.E ���'L� Date: 1 Z /L �) 6 -�� 1 The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-trans able r ponsibility for ad rim t nd complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaifner and gns and dates it below. Signature: :/t / l'�?s� Date: / L C GGGG w G:\PermitCenter\FORMS\DRD FORMS\Master Pcrmit Application 7-8-04.doc 1 .\ .a 0`"+.•-6 • IIM Le) 1 | in i= . \ = 8 ~ m m k : 2 � � \ \ a © = »f f o ] a ( HiLfl \\ �\ £ \ � » �� ___ = mo /: m 7 § f / § E /£ . _ 1J}U1UL13E g. > � eg # 0 2 .0-(D \ ¥ = / Ef / \ § / /{ � % = 2E = - � Rt 7 { E » / » ) � k £ } \ b [ £2 § k CD cn 22 ,- 2 ƒ \ .- m = f00 -0 (7) + �w « 6e, se2 g » 2bf / % k � ` p � °-0 C.) f /f\ k E /� k } \# � � \ 2 % @ \ f# CO f}/ 32 » » E k > ac @ / = o ma = t 3 �f f� » E . 3 § / \ / ( c \ \ E » _0 , / / \ {CD CD k y \ - - * %( \ &EJ m\ \)c / c \c 0 / o I \ \ 2® % §0. ! m 0 ) « / \ ) j A ) _ 44 a § ee � k \ \ § 0f ce ] $ . ) a .9 \ .<0 *. / a OWNER BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed project. Signature: Date: GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) Fax: ( MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: ❑ New ❑ Wood Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑ Addition ❑ Steel Proposed: Bank ❑ Community System ❑ Alteration/Remodel ❑ Concrete Total: Height: ❑ Individual System ❑ Repair ❑ Masonry SEP Permit# ❑ Demolition ❑ Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: ❑ Public Total: Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane Tank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: ❑ Underground Tank LI Above ground Tank Size of Propane Tank: ❑ Heat Stove ❑ Cook Stove ❑ Woodstove 11 Fireplace Insert ❑ Hot Water Tank C Pellet Stove ❑ Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured!Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines, tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage For Office Use Only Current Proposed Amount Main Floor Consistency Review: 2NU Floor Base fee: 3ne Floor Additional Sljectiott: rz i_. Mezzanine: Plan Check fee: Heated Basement State Surcharge fee: DEC 21 MIS Unheated Basement Pot Water Review fee: Other Unheated 911/Rd Approach fee: Garage/Carport TOTAL: $ Decks Receipt Number: Other Cash/Check Number: ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: •Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish Initials: G:\PermitCenter\FORMS\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc ONL, O� JEFFERSON COUNTY r`4 I' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street•• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 r !1 360/379-4450 • 360/379451 Fax i - I�' .1•0„,_ NO�o wow.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommdevelopment DEC 21 2005 `=r Master Permit Application MLA: _ Project Description (include separate sheets as necessary): Tax Parcel ,, c Property Q Number: yd Pa O 6 Size: • 0m''-k- (acres/square feet)— Site Address and/or Directions to Pro. Property Owner(s)of Record: -. - °l ►an . 4 d Telephone: r S—(c, g" - C3 Fax: -,c? / email: Mailing Address: e_ _ —�_.,1'.3 c^ Applicant/Agent(if different from own '): tiv�g {- Telephone: a_ S-`—�i 6.4 Fax _ ' /f-- _g • email: ry=e'r/PS y rte-+ Mailing Address: �. • 1 t/r • - . />, ri L II ' I d d / What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies) 0 Building 0 Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) U Demolition Permit 0 Conditional Use[C(a), C(d),or C]" 0 Single Family U Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification U Garage Attached/Detached 0 Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)'" U Manufactured Home U Boundary Line Adjustment n Modular 0 Short Plat" 0 Commercial' 0 Binding Site Plan" U Change of Use 0 Long Plat" U Address 0 Road Approach 0 Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments" 0 Propane D Plat Vacation/Alteration" U Allowed'Yes"Use Consistency Analysis 0 Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions" Stormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development" ite Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)' ❑ U Shoreline Management Variance Temporary Use D Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment U Wireless Telecommunication' D Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment 0 Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium May require a Pre—Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please.identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: S DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate / -1-4-142-2f.–' r /. r 4.°1,!.._ to act as my agent in matters relating to this ap lication for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE t��.�i6ir a �� Date: f �/2,6�o By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or It's knowledge. My material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result In this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide a•••- and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any ryp red later` spections.Access,•• rig •f-ntry to this property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. i "/� -_`' /''}► __ Signature: /,�� ✓/�•.� i -!7 Date: / '/2 v b d The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act'or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and • ble >,... '.lity for ad•:ri • . : • complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disdai er and gns and dates it below. Signature: /5i� / A/ 1 Date: I Z�7 4 d G:\PamitCenter\FORMS\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 7-8-04.doc ss.soN c,0 �''sy °} JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE'V �ixIl`�'11�j 1- 621 Sheridan Street ;i i' Port Townsend, WA 98368 DEC 2 1 2005 1,t;, Al Scalf, Director - 1 Letter of Representation When an applicant for a permit is not the owner of the property it is necessary for the property owner to submit a letter of representation. The letter needs to have the owner's original signature. An example is below: Date To Whom It May Concern: I, John Doe, owner of 123 Fir Street, Parcel # 123-456-789, give permission to Tom Sawyer to apply for a permit on the above referenced property. Sincerely, Date //0/0 S— To Whom It May Concern: I, e4 //4Sd►1 , owner of lAol /�f I ►t(So>'1 S. P. , (props owner's name) (a dress or legal description) Parcel # '([z.'400 108 , give permission to burvet -6107.a.vAs , (parcel number)- (applicant's name) to apply for a .. ?,4-14D permit from Jefferson County on the above (type of permit) referenced property. Sincerely, I , Building Permits/Inspections Development Review Division Long Range Planning (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 G:1PermilCenter\FORMS1.eder of Repreeenlafion.doc FRC' : PUD1JEFF1_:3• PHONE r.Ci. tki;r:.:.71:IS ':ct. 05 20135 Uc:;e5PIi Fi . sera... tAN./ 4. ; 1`�- sa.>�, Public Utility District #1 tit vrsed June OOi Of Jefferson County WATER AVAILABILITY NOTIFICATION Card of Commissioners Cana Robet-is. Di&ct M Ke1'y Hays,District 2 PUBLIC WAFER SYSTEM Wayne G. King. District 3 James G. Parker Manager Tx Jefferson Count}' Environmental Health Department From: Quimper Water System grZEOVErnS1 System Operator:�,ric ,Store�.�V�`D'A�. :� T�C? t J rl : il, DEC 21 2005 ' State ID Number: 05783U ' Number of existing connections: . 2025 estimated__T Number of pemtitted connections: __, 2426 _-- This water system is capable of,and will supply potable wafer to the following location: Assessor's Parcel In# /g e .2 7 0010? Legal Description: 11.4 St)N;.__ S)--hot- Pv r f r�i 3 Are C- ✓✓0 1 2. Water Servics Connection is available. once all fees•/Char&`., have been.paid Site Address: Title: W'i►'. —-- - Date: 1 d 1..5 I 0 a THIS IS NON-BINDING STATEMENT OF WATER AVAILABFLITY. TT PROVIDES THAT AT THE TIME OF REQUEST WATER IS AVAILABLE WITHIN THIS SYSTEM. THE NOTIFICATION IS GOOD FOR ONE YEAR. 23C Chimac,im P•)sc acx 979, Port Frad;ock. 125C136.5-3,300 FAX 136O: 3an 159.4; Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:59 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: mIa05-737 Nason Zoe, I revisited the site 1/20/06 and found unsuitable conditions in all but 2 holes, the ones furthest east. They will need to contact the designer/engineer to discuss options. Possibly curtain drain, other holes. etc. The proposed onsite sewage area will need to be staked prior to approval since they are proposing 2 residences and the satelite bedroom and an easement that will account for these changes will also be necessary. A reinspection fee is required to verify any new areas they propose and checking the staked area. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County 1 Page l of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Randi Thurston [thursrlt @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:09 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Habitat Management Plan for Lot 2 Nason Short Plat Zoe, I'm leaving for a two week vacation tomorrow and the comment period for this document expires while I'm gone. I apologize for e-mailing my response but the emergencies from the rain have me working overtime just to issue HPAs with deadlines in the next two weeks. My main concern with the proposal is with the size of the building envelop. It seems that a smaller more compact residence could be constructed to provide a larger buffer for the wetland. While removal of invasive species and replanting with natives, if properly maintained, will help improve the habitat function and value, area should also be a major consideration. As I stated in my previous letter, science has shown that a 50-foot wide buffer, even one in a relatively natural condition, isn't adequate to protect many wetland functions especially for wildlife. In addition to a smaller envelop, could a variance from the road set backs be obtained to provide additional buffer? 1/13/2006 • Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Randi Thurston [thursrlt @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:35 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Fw: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel Previous correspondence. Original Message---- From: Randi Thurston To: dixie @cablespeed.com Cc: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:33 PM Subject: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel Recommended wetland buffers were established based on a review of Best Available Science (BAS) to protect the functions and values of wetlands. As a result of the BAS review, a 150—foot buffer width is currently required for Category 1 wetlands in Jefferson County's Critical Areas Ordinance. An ecotone or edge is a place where two different plant communities meet. This junction is either a boundary or transition zone where plant and associated wildlife communities interface. The buffer around the wetland is the bridge between the upland habitat and the aquatic environment. The ability of the areas to attract and support wildlife is dependent on the structural and functional integrity of the three interrelated ecosystems: aquatic, riparian, and upland not just to the wetland itself. Both Best Available Science for recommended buffer widths for Category 1 wetlands and riparian functions in marine ecosystems indicate much larger buffers than 50 feet are needed to protect wetland/riparian function which include fish and wildlife habitat. In 1997, WDFW published Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Nearly 1,500 pieces of literature on the importance of riparian areas to fish and wildlife were evaluated, and land use recommendations designed to accommodate riparian-associated fish and wildlife were developed. Although the document focused on lotic systems,the attributes that contribute to the diversity and abundance of terrestrial wildlife in marine riparian areas are the same as those for lotic systems and include: • structural complexity; • connectivity with other ecosystems; • abundant food source and available water; • moist and moderate climate. WDFW Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats: Riparian published December 1997 summarizes the riparian habitat functions or specific wildlife uses, organized by riparian habitat width. Many of the riparian habitat functions/parameters are applicable to subject property. Appendix C (attached) from the document, gives the riparian habitat function and the recommended buffer, associated with that function along with the source document. The recommended buffer in almost all cases far exceeds the 50-foot buffer proposed. Buffer widths needed to protect wildlife using wetlands generally range from 100 to 600 feet or more. As you pointed out the subject property is obviously a disturbed site. Land clearing and filling is often an avenue for expansion of non-native invasive plant species which colonize disturbed areas. Non-native invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry in the case of this site and Japanese knotweed out-compete native plants and displace wildlife associated with those native plant communities. Land clearing and filling also results in a loss of structural diversity (multiple canopy layers, and a well developed shrub layer) that provides nesting,breeding, and hiding cover and food for wildlife. Pesticides and fertilizers used for residential application and sedimentation from land clearing can impact water quality in the wetland. In addition, land clearing alters the microclimate. 1/17/2006 • Page 2 of 2 Likely impacts that will result from home construction include increased noise and light that will affect wildlife usage and increased amounts of surface water runoff that may increase the risk of flooding and change the salinity of the wetland and thus plant communities and the associated wildlife will be impacted. In addition, the loss of a safe conuidor for wildlife to move from area to area, this is especially important in areas where development has made upland travel routes unavailable, discontinuous, or life endangering. Much of the landward side of the estuary has single-family homes and a roadway aligns the shoreline. WDFW has identified marine/estuarine shorelines as a priority habitat in part due to comparatively high density and diversity of wildlife species, important wildlife seasonal ranges, limited availability, high vulnerability to habitat alternation and dependent species (WDFW 2004). Of the 331 terrestrial wildlife species known to inhabit King County, Washington, 263 wildlife species (are known or expected to have associations with marine riparian habitats including 9 amphibian species; 5 reptile species; 193 bird species; and 45 mammal species (Brennan and Culverwell 2004 attached). Since Jefferson County also lies within the Puget Sound lowland, the wildlife species are similar to those in King County. Just in the short time I was at the site, I observed Great-blue heron, migrating waterfowl and evidence of raccoon and river otter usage of the site. The WDFW priority and species map show waterfowl and shorebird concentrations using the estuary. In addition,juvenile salmonids migrating from the nearby fish bearing stream likely use the estuary for feeding and rearing when they emerge from the stream. In addition, recent research on estuaries show that juveniles salmonids from other areas will feed and rear in estuaries along their mitigation route to the ocean. WDFW recommends subject property acquired by the local land trust and preserved as open space and we are willing to look for funding. However, if the owner is unwilling to allow acquisition of the property as open space, WDFW understands the difficulty in denying use of the property to protect a critical area even when it is among the remaining functioning Category 1 wetlands connected to Puget Sound. WDFW recommends the smallest development that will allow reasonable use for subject property be permitted and thus hopefully result in a larger buffer than the proposed 50 feet. An example would be a very small dwelling such a cabin or placement of a small park model manufactured home onsite. In addition, non-native vegetation in the buffer should be removed and native plants should be planted and maintained to ensure survival. The native plant species should be selected based a nearby relatively undisturbed reference site with similar physical attributes to the subject property. In addition to minimizing the building envelop, other measures such as requiring the residence to be designed such that interior lights will be directed away from the wetland, routing all new, untreated runoff away from the wetland, establishing covenants to limit the use of pesticides and fertilizers within 150 feet of the wetland, retrofitting stormwater detention and treatment for road and driveways, preventing channeled flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer, and require the planting of dense native (i.e. Nooka rose) hedge to delineate the wetland buffer edge. 1/17/2006 v i 4t w i .- _ 1 • J' ,� , '- '\. , v --..� ..•.I- _ / -- 1 L i1,' f~"� :,• 4,.. �.t 'A' . , . ,- � A N nis. l r 1, f § ,�, i ... + '11,-. .4 \ i lit t. yY y• f.. i 1 , , foR r J .i ._ r ► y. „r � "rte-- \ •_ ' �� / • J�. \ 1 . , ✓. Y -•' J . \ :-' %.p t !1i c jir. 7 5 " lv • ►i y W' 1 i -� w 1— ' ti •\ 1 Jl 1?* ik .„, ., ,, . v , f,- -.....„ • J ` f r• , I " '.f.. o y f •` •.4 .- I ':. - „ltd..... j -� r' l..' i. .. � ''.�\mil }. 1' 4+ J j• ' 1• ",i* • '.n.,*' ..1. � • y Ar 441 +1 �1D.��Z w av, 1 9 •L 11 w � . s1. Y / .,�= v. y .•-• ++Y/ • ' JSA •....t _1 .. _ •^; .:.- . • r�' .' ••(t. ' ♦ 't .rr 1 y - .1 -71.71,.. I•. yiu If yyy '1. J . -414,4.‘ , M IV u :4,`jRy/.b xa?c •i +fJ.j _• 1 , 1. X44,. ,'M, `-fir• � •Aril,:.-- `„..Y j� .• .% r`''• , �' f .. . ..fi ,! �"'`M. r a } f�.� ly }'`'� `' . •tl' `Y V w ✓ i .„ • ' (a • ` s,-LA: 1 +'.iT r l -- T� \ .mot' ^ ,.,..K.,• Iii' (� 'A� l r 1 , i �� � Y�0. ^•Aor {,ti .•�• ,. ,• .4:-...t • •2 .fi r., •,,... . i �\ _, \.: ,' " 5I te. r• 3 j F ' �' t. y�• i-y :A.� l- .:) iY KiY � .n. •f ilk+1R,t_9t \ •.\ 6 y�•�#t. , .F , ` / `�` • CV `• ` 41.. hi ,S M1 ��`-' x' � } �' l;,-�:. i_. 1 , -�4M4 „ ,. C , $ `I •y ,- vas'> h "t:�'�' !_ ,, ---- ..::•'• ,7 ''- M { / ✓ r [ . rr`� � t 7i j� ' b _ :" •'S':•tlatc••4 tiff, '• UMW". . , - • - _...-....1.--.. -''. 7'': ..itt".:''' too i • — . . .r • ,. iv* , , _.• • r L. . - . -. • . - - • ..!` st', 4.,, • ,e --. . ' .-.• ... . a 10-‘ • -,,• - -. - . :■f. 4.. . • 1 • I . " _. . 7. .,.- " • ...° a,,,:•7 :.: . --.. ..1V . . . . " -1-. ••azadisl ,••'' - .) • • oi t•A' .- °N ' .0• *- . •''•: ;1•• i .• . ri - '. -'•-• • . . :A: '•• .... ...pa- a og. i' , •. 1••,..e '4, a. ' - 7/ s .4• " 7.. ...I: . • . I..;"C•. I'.• Air-..:77.'s •'' .7%' •-. ''' 4.... . . 1 . ••••: ----" • '''. - ' 44E-';'-71-1- ' ' . _ . .., • 11.1•• ' - -• , ''s, -f ,-....:••••• • ,. ---.;;Se•r--' 4•: -,-• ' • " -- - - y .' ,-.:,... ).• '., '--:, L ' ', '1:■.; • r Ir.,:;_i,..•- At.'.--1,4-1/), :.. '-' /. ,‘.. -..:- A ,, • .• . r." - - .e-- . -• , -- - . ,..• .w., 1-, k-'-•..W./ - ''...ii• ..-:;.,4 '.; ) .„, L. . 3.,!•••4 ' , - ••',. :-. . • --,,,,,' --- ., •',„ 71 i...; _,,„ :„.„....„..- • . . , . . 4...S. ,.., 1 th.■. .■ -7 -I- - %,.ir-1,.. e'1:-;". ,37 14 k4:11K-V•• ;.* .4;7! . t 461 N •' • ili"..;;:"r .;''''"...... ' ,10'' ' F4.: ,,... ," 47-• -' .4 IC%+.4.7:A.::!C:)."‘ 111'-'. reltAllig,, • -:;,-_...." . .•V ').' 'C. . i:',.. -.. -s?" ,- v.•,..... .-.4,-.1 ,es.. ,_:,..... . . ,.,- , -....; {-- ;.,.- . ,... - ":;7*. . It-1/4, • ...:'.J.. g VlitZe • . t • it i.-...,4: 143,* :„,, ,.* •, '' -• ,, • ' "74I i:ii".'•• '' IIIV 14. • n 4 . 4AL At■, V . ''' ''' ..-'4'7•40s-,-?"'"- 4 adilPit :,• • . ;7 "fat-'‘ le41■0' fj.--7"4g°' ik'•it-<:'': ' •-- ' . ■ 1. • ...: . .„,,, , ), 7.*• ;,. .. x• ,‘ ‘' .Ntt....'.4_... • .. '-. ' ; ...::.'--''. - ."4,;''*4.,.;•.v.4i''. ,114'l'' 'AkkC4.4.---*-- ':' • • I. - •,.; • ....$1',. • , :-., .,.. ,r7. .:4 ''-tvIN ..• * t.t.-*F.0 ' ....k .,d ilk4',..--,;" i.'.06.,0;• ,..,".7 i.. ' N41. ...\,—,.. ,,,,, . ,,,,,r; . .,,,.. 01. •:-.A ..c,,, ;;A',. .c-,tris,...•,,,;, „ ,w.411,2.›; ..., ., ,,,.-- „, ., , - 1.--, -..... .--*--.6....,-...-1.111. -1' .- --4., "' '''••..-'7%,ee!• /.0.: 44• 1 tr., -,..4%:,,,t-tt.1 .,‹: ,.,...z.ig,'4*,-.% .tle . ---:-,."',,- ....'''- ''':. L.' '«4,- s.,c.- -. . it'.1, ',.'.`••*•.;'44.;4.4 ,..614.44 *,. .',>P7...•.-- (!cc1.0..-_,V..- '4.-:,: ir-- :i.''.' ,,,.. _ --"- :'''"- -4,7'..-7, . ? - '."'N-k • 1r!:;•-v-it 1 V -7114-rf '?_.-..1,.*i ";---A.;:sv7.-'-?:01.......,... "!ss' • ,.-..... ...."-, 1-:-A1.",_1.,---;:::- . .,.._ ..N.;44'..1 -v•tt 44.1e^' • - .....4- ...1„,....... *.t, .°'att ...41111*21 P:7,10. ' ...A‘, ..•e ' •'.. i/;;'. .' Wk.*.4. ;•••.''.. • ,,:r'7.•.""t.Z.,, ..W 4V( % ‘.. 41(...2A -14t1 •.,4%..\ Aialiii '' .... t •-k ,P?• - ....r..-t- ,..::. ',..... .,- -...-„...,,,,, .. '''s '1".. ----:' -')N.s ' .. r■z..i.. Vie 4 .4l!-,\- 4, , . , '' 4P,..: ,-. ..o .i, ..... ---•,\.. -.. — • --s ,:...774-•:. - . — • ..:-/..-: / . -..;._,.-‘•-•:+i-,- ,/.....'•,.... ' ts?i. ‘A''x. II'...4i; -"Xt 4r ‘t. . _- t,' t i r %•....- . ';;F:';F. . • i.: 4. ‘,."7"4 t0'. ; 0. .. ...... • I r 1. %, 4,k • ; , ‘4 A. f A ,..,t . 4,711`....... .b...."7., .\ ' '7,..... s• •" - "* .--s 7 Rs ' '7 t'.11.:0... .4e• ` dit•••■•-i"-""'-'4!"-N- ' , • Ar ? 4 ' -' 7-e's,' bt \ t4,4' 'Pi 1 • ' .7 NAV ...4'■ '"- , .- . 4. It -/ ''-':0"4:.. •-ra• , .. 4, • 1.7•- Zic:...."4 -.4........., ..tit, 11., .Lv:%.74* . •":".„,:-. ‘" . • r .- • . s ,''.. , . ......:„.•7. k. .. :; ,, ...4" l'..,,..,'',..„■et% ' ,. ".•,i.:,..,t. '.i.,. — tt. \ s..-,- -_ .1‘,.- 14•• ' „„g0t ' - 4,• F"75.1; -1, ••..,pA,:.„...,. .''Asii.,'Irkeiiitki,.. '-:\ , - - 1 1 „ • ... • .. -.4 t... . ,.....:0 . • i Ara,N'' \ ' 14,,_••i.. :"..., ''' . - 4.,-..,-,,,, •-*N't ::,.., ,,Isfe,■■ . --,..N. 4,:: • ---4- 7o. , , :...-e= ,;, ,..t. 4s,A:. -,4,*- -•- \ 1-:.,1_, ', , ......t %,.- ..-.• ,,,: .• ...)," 'vy. 0 j 194\NNitts, 4-N''',„:".„'. ' rb i • --g' ** .4;--,.. .t .4;- - , ‘ 4-'1, ..; :,t-ti,' ....t_ N.*. . ,.. r.: . : r „, •- • -- 'ai-c-11 - -igli' - - i:., . - .,4. - _ 114.p .%fiSs,' 4, - .: ',,,, -•--:;,.-1 _-- -..- - ..F.,........„:.. -...„.. , ,-‘,...... , ',,,,, -t. , ;: / ..._ -.0.. -7....__ • -• ' - l'i;\..:-1. alt-7,4* .,. . . -: .i._rap . .- L, :•• .. .-aqr7 - r ..... ;-vaii. ., -. .. • . . °-- Vss-..- -, ... : ' •',-.-'. .. - / . . »,..\ -‘.........:•-•-•- ; ‘- - . i /v..... v 'K.. .-'s - s "'\ - -• --. Act,.. .f.. . ' " ' .„._ •,, ■ . .- - ;•••-? \,' ' • • - A . At -. • ' ' • ; .•11.-' ft■ , '\ - \...:'...- -,'.-/ .. '■:"/....f..".. 4 „,..", \ T'. - t .'.. . r,/.....•N 2 '', .4..-.•,.. A NI,j.16 ', .... ..., N,_ )0 -7 ',;(:.1...,..2\ , kl.4y_.• ' I. • / t ,...r--,:r; _.V.,,, %,ir. ,,, ,,.„,,,.. .. .. . ,.....,..,.. ... . ,. .... ....,, .... .„ .. ,„.., • -.-- ,. 1.1,70 ... ....:, ,-- .--;.:t --- 1"--- ..,..,.,. .•,,,• 4 .'1..:' . ....,,, . .,. :. ( . ,• 0r. ' • - . - ' - ..•''. ....- *" \ . \. Ill&igy...,..L.- -. . ' .- -••• ' i• • Ntev:ea, Nik,,,sz2.-wA.-:_, _, :MIL_.. .... J .''' 1,46 . . .... , i.4•7' \ Va.- . . . - . 1 "0.. i $",.'.011'4..7-•-"` - - s. .0 4 Vr/. V' • t Yff.i ibi.; _- ...--- _-,- ,_. i -, 1,, t 14. i,.* t .. r=:-., .... -• fr...1 b....---- . . .d........ •- 1 lii, - •_ - . ■ 1 -41,-••,_, __-_-.. -----? --_,..._ , .,... , . W"-, ..,714,g, .. . • ,„,, * k ,. .-....,-- . --,„..„ .:,... ..... ___ . , , ... ..-..-,.. .„..A.,-,,iit . ,-, „... , rr-4, . -7 . 1■, 7: . . . • ' '414,y1IF'. s 6.. .._,. . -,... ., i..._1. -A • s:' . . r'', 1"'•. . . .. . , '•1' - 7 w, . ` 4 ' t I ' 4 4 w . •. • '' A. 1i -- _.Y ` -•••• . .I• t . . „to, { A C - A < - • , .� .r.r I IiRA !I }2..{ . .��r si may^ • ;.. ' /'.., wG� ■ • a '/. • , , t : ;-, ,. . / c -. • • • / .J ' .✓ '- 1 Y' f r��' i. .. . • l •' ' .' • I. / . , ,,,' ., /. • If/; •/ , y . 'II .I • I / r . . 44 , ,'• e� - • i !i • r • / ,4a' •, ./v r ' i / , •i . ,, S. 0 L, / ..y / .�i. ; I ' .r/ ,. y• , • _ -1.:f' • . 'Iy, . rte ,• /, �I • Y • 1 t I / • / i. ' . p ^ • 6 • ,�- •� i �� - �� - - - rl, F \— \� r ' \;*. a '' ter- .,•✓+" -.J ` v ._ t - i �- EE wi a I =r •- ' 3 _ _ \ -' uy�... • /I.pR• Nom° -s_ -A` r -f 1, • • 1. " .. '.,,.t P. l n -- i ' .• . A- 1,r, " , r. _ ,• :� ..- r .. _ 4 £: °'• - • a cif ry �� +. 1 r ♦r %X l a~vX.•r..� • _t' 1 •••et '4, ••• ,yet y ptr•. -"— — , `i4 + T _ _....... Y6µ ~ -iF ` G---.4 e a wi. d,t .-4 . _ R _ I. .. . mss..•' � mss. ,... L a . f:I " ■`S • ;r _ 1-‘4F' V A.'. . flit. Y aj. rf i •T t - / t, fit Z irr ' `( )*wee";3, - :J✓ L; :a 3 a . Y`:r !F.',ti '\ :.. .. ' 7( 4.4,,-;Ar -.4, .t.' r a v ! ■' �: L•� P ` tw � , S y ti ^ • .,:, ‘- \J N v\` '� Y.iw A. w w.y,y � t`,�„V.,...'.::'J'„ `t'4�t. ��'t i �t' :w -.4'4'. `�� / 2L- `i' � ..�i' F}`Z'1"„` fi i"�i7 S r '.� X { A '°� ` '. ,1,�,, .-- ``'ate \ Y' ., ..yfpg --> �y , a1 �. • 5r1 v� # .% v y, s3 .. . .. "k"- '4p+? Y 1, at i"t�� r �..--t. •��. C • i. D r .y! ar ,ytiy, l V• •. ^Imoy.-r.. / '�`. 1 `� .,"°.�'° 1 i 'y 'o ' '''"et ., is ."+we x .is'%• 4-4.4*.a Y G t . ti.• , .. Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:26 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: mla05-737 Nason I will contact the designer but I assumed you would be doing the contact with the client and Barbara. definately wear rubber boots the entire site is really wet! The best place to enter the site is from Cleveland, off the driveway that goes to # 40. Its the first paved/surfaced drive on Cleveland. About 100'+from Cleveland there is a trail in through the brambles. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County Original Message From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Monday,January 23, 2006 7:22 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: mlaOS-737 Nason Did you contact Barbara, the owner or the septic designer? Stacie and I will be going on site tomorrow (Tuesday) morning. I'll put your comments in an additional information request to Barbara and the owner. Sincerely, Z.oe Ann Lamp Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 62 f Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-9406 Pax: 360-379-4+77, Original Message From: Linda Atkins Sent: Sunday,January 22, 2006 8:59 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: mla05-737 Nason Zoe, I revisited the site 1/20/06 and found unsuitable conditions in all but 2 holes, the ones furthest east. They will need to contact the designer/engineer to discuss options. Possibly curtain drain, other holes. etc. The proposed onsite sewage area will need to be staked prior to approval since they are proposing 2 residences and the satelite bedroom and an easement that will account for these changes will also be necessary. 1 A reinspection fee is required to verify any new areas they propose and checking the staked area. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 always working for a safer and healthieryefferson County 2 Page 1 ot 2 Barbara Blowers From: Paul Keegan [pauLkeeganadrstrong.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:11 PM To: Barbara Blowers Subject: RE: Nason Soil logs The next time I'm in Port Townsend I am coming to your office and I am going sit down at your computer and give that thing an update No problem. I'll just copy it to this page. fir=7\ r ;011 y7, uf, / DEC 21 2005 !. SOIL LOG DESCRIPTIONS D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approx. Site Address: Oak Bay Client: Nason Soil Texture Type: V Date Soils Logged: 12.8.05 Soils Logged By: DRJ Soil Log# 1 0 - 10 ' Top Soil 10 -. 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 36" Soil Log# 2 0 - 2 " Top Soil 2 - 36 ' Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 36 - 42 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand 42 - 76 " Brown Silty Medium Sand w/Gravel Water at 76" Roots to 42" Soil Log# 3 0- 7 " Top Soil 7 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 36 - 67 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Water at 67" Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 Page 2 of 2 Soil Log# 4 0 - 10 ,, Top Soil :7-77r lo - 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling ••1 tf.; " qt; rm. k ! 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand : Water at 72" . : DEC 21 2005 • • Roots to 24" Soil Log# 5 • • 0 - 8 " Top Soil 8 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 36 - 66 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 lltl...—Lu—Z:ô 0 1J r 4 D. R. STRONG 425 827 2423 P.01,81 . D.R. STRONG JOB N 0.5o n 7. r , CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. SHEET NO. I , Of I 10604 Northeast 38th Place Suite 101 CALCULATED BY D Fl U 1:1411t— KIRKLAND,WA 98033 . : cHEacitOrer:\ , arrE , (425) 827-3063 - FAX.(425)827-2423 . ,. .-.- ;----J---- .=-'-•-•=-4asia.tea.'„-K1(101-1 Sot I rcTliTeocor).+P? , 1 , -----i- • - ■ -1.-.-4... r .-__ I I . 1 : I ' : : 1 • ; ■ I ' , 11 ---n-- -• -11-• --.......---...—.---.3..___ r !■••- ' • , „ , I I 1 , : ! "f : • ! 1 ; 1 • ..; 11 I___i I i I : • : , • , • • a , , • • , . _-• cl- • 1 • -561 , 11 : . , i ; 1, 1 . j_ 1 , ,• • P 11 oTi- e) , ! .-Ir 14- ! ; 41. 411,I IIII ■ 1 1 I i I ; : i ; • __ f 1111 0 II ! I 8 • II : ; : : i • : I t ' ' 1 , . • . . I 1 i I II ; I 1 : l• 1 : I ; .. I—.11144 ' . ' ' : • I a • 1 , ; , 1- --r I I I : ! ' I I I : , ' • ! I ' , i I 4 11 • • • 1 ),a, ', , , ; ----, ! " • . 1 -.1..- ! I , • I I • , II : : 11 . 11 : , 4 i • • • , _....I I : ' 1..._.1 ! ; _i . .111 \ 1 !- : I I I : 1 : 1 ! : I : 1 ' I 1 i i I 1 • 1 : -I I i• -.i 1 i i 1• i-• -----r---- r ; • ---r-•-f-- I . 111111i , , , ..... ., 4.----• • - - . I • ' : ! I I ; • 1 + , • I „ I .. 1 , II • , .1 , 1 ; , , . I 1 --1. . . selTtrodilL. ..i : 1 ! 1 . :, 1 • i : I 1 : : . 11 I 1 1 I ' " I ' ' I . I 6 : ; ; 1 I I ! II I I • I I t : • ---fr•-'" . III" II ; ." 1—: ; ; -1 .--: \ ' ; -• •-.± : . : II _. _ 4___i_l_. I ■ 11 : 11 ; ; : / Ilisi I , ! I 1 , ; 0 1 I 1 I : 1 i 1 ' .. .. -- 4. ' _I 1 • I I. i I . . II .81 ! 8, i 11 ; Ni 1 : i . i • -1. 1 • 7- --"— — ! 1, _...t 1 1 i _4_, i ,r. i j t , _! 1 : ; , ... : . : : ! : ; • i ! ! ! 1 , 11 . , ,.., , , , . _!.. INI : i ! , . jtir___" 7 --r- --L :. , i : , 111 : • 1 ! 1: 1 : 1• 111 : ; I : I 1 • : ! : :** I • I , h----r"--."•1 : . !__, ,,_ e.,p,i, 1 ; : i , 1 i , , ' 1 , , , , , . , ; : , , , ; ; il • • •,---). ---, 1 ----1 .,..s. 1 ; ,...; . , . , . 1 :. 1 • •, : i . ; - 1 ; ,,,..; • ' • 1 : 1 . ! Ii . illil ! ; ! ! : 1 litc .:1)--1 :, : i — „ q aJ ; ! 1 : ) ; 1 , 11 ! 1 ! , it: ,11. 1A.tL•s5 -11 ; .•1 i t a) 1 ! • , ' i ; Iii • ii •, ,o-•••r1 --I ' lliii ; , . >1 , . r . ,4• ; • 1! _at • ; • £15 4? 6 • • i • ; : : i • ; • . ; ; • • 1 ' • 1 i I • qs. t -k ' ' I 1 1 . . • .. 1 ; ; • • ...L._,.,- • ; • r I , 7 • , --I—I 1 i I i I I I 1 ' 1 -71. I : i 1-- 't • IS I I ' 11 —r—...:4"'--- 17-1— . — ., _ ..I..,._ : ,_' „ I _ ; • , , • ,_1 i a.. :„._j_ i I, I, •—_—+— I ..a.-^ li I I, i • . • ' a ; a , 7--1 • • • - ;--•7 -fr—l----r- ' ; —'• • i 1 I ; • I : t I ' : 1 ; 1 • ...— a. . --.--IF—_,. . ; .—...—L....—, :— • • ' •I ' ' ; 0 • ' ; I • ' • i • • , i ' I "; a • 1 1 • , • I , , • : • , I '. , • : a a 1 ; , ; • • 1 • 1 ; 1 • • 1 1 • j . --.L-2 • • . t ' '.. • .........--1--- ... . '....... • ! ' i, . '..... 1 : . 1 : : • : 1 1 • l .'".".""•"."•. ' I I .7.. ! - i ■ I • . r 1 ;:. • ---1-7-7-•—:----,--T. . . ....._.......___.! ---.1.--_,___4. . • •t • ------:__•_.; .....,___ 91e.,2,.... • • • •••"•••r +•-4 • • ;re■•■ 0---- - • • ! . I ; ! I I ' 1 ! I -FO r7FII:k_le..; Wri,\II ! ! : • 1 : I 1 . i I ' • 1 • • - • ■ 1 II 'i---1---4 ", 1 ----j-41 ---e1 - -' ■ 1; , , . • • I • , , , 1 . , • ; , : i • • i ! i I ; , - -- : • .- ; ; • i -,- ___,......._1__ . ---T I 1 • i : •• : I I ; I • ; ! . , : • i • . . , I , • 1 : • : . I " • i • . . . ...;_____ . . • ---;- • ! 4.- ; ! ! • - -• ' , •. .-, • 1 ; : i . . i ; • 1 ; • - 1 • : • • ! ' i I ' • • . , • . . , • ! , • • : . . ....__ _ • I , - I ! • • • r 1 r • 1 . , —............:. _ _ ___ '----- ' I i L•-: I • • . ... • , 1 I • . . , • . . . • . . • Ii :— • . , , I 1 .... .:: ; :J1—"."—":1 I" / • : 1 . • • . • : ; I • ; ; • ; i 1 ; •• • . 1 • . : :... .. .. .—.—...■,—■.—... • I • ........• 1 a • , . , . • _, a I i • g ! 1 '" •.: . ... • : : i ■ 1 g 1 : 1 1 . • • : ......... ,.... ......__.,...... ; ] 1 : : •• • : . 1 • : ' • o 1 : , • . I • • ... •• ' ' i ! . 1. •• i : : I 1 . 1 • i ! . I I i . • • I . J . , I , , • ; • • I , • • . • 1 . . • • • . n'—"----- • ..`--------- ---- a . 1 : i • • , -- — - ; ; • . . . i • . • TOTAL P.01 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 7:22 AM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: mIaO5-737 Nason Did you contact Barbara, the owner or the septic designer? Stacie and I will be going on site tomorrow (Tuesday) morning. I'll put your comments in an additional information request to Barbara and the owner. Sincerely, Zoe Ann Lamp Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development' 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98 5 68 Phone: 560-585-9406 Fax: 56o-579A-475 Original Message From: Linda Atkins Sent: Sunday,January 22, 2006 8:59 AM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: mIa05-737 Nason Zoe, I revisited the site 1/20/06 and found unsuitable conditions in all but 2 holes, the ones furthest east. They will need to contact the designer/engineer to discuss options. Possibly curtain drain, other holes. etc. The proposed onsite sewage area will need to be staked prior to approval since they are proposing 2 residences and the satelite bedroom and an easement that will account for these changes will also be necessary. A reinspection fee is required to verify any new areas they propose and checking the staked area. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 �Cways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Linda Atkins Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:56 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: RE: SPAAD at Cleveland and oak Bay county Park. Barbara Blowers I will go to the site tomorrow to check again but I may have to say I cannot permit anything where they have proposed it if the conditions are the same, water at less than 12" from the surface. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 ACways working fora safer and healthier Jefferson County Original Message From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Wednesday,January 18, 2006 3:03 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: RE: SPAAD at Cleveland and oak Bay county Park. Barbara Blowers Do you think this will require a wet season also? Zoe Original Message From: Linda Atkins Sent: Wednesday,January 18, 2006 3:03 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: SPAAD at Cleveland and oak Bay county Park. Barbara Blowers Zoe, I went to this site and the water is nearly at the surface of the ground in all of the holes that I saw. I will go back out on Friday but wanted to let you know what I had seen so far. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 ACways working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Zoe Ann Lamp Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 2:18 PM To: Cara Leckenby Cc: Stacie Hoskins Subject: Nason SPAAD (Barbara Blowers) - Portage Way Cara, Kathie Anne and I took in a SPAAD from Barbara Blowers yesterday. Its one of those 30 day SPAAD's. I put the file in your box. Please do the following: L/15 Assign to me. t'2.Jssue Determination of Completeness Letter (A) Send reviewer letter(change the time frame to 28 days for review)with an agency packet to: a) Gretchen Lux- DOE Department of Ecology P 0 Box 47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 b) RANDI THURSTON WDFW 502 HIGH ST STE 112 PORT ORCHARD WA 98366-4718 LPdake a note on Randi Thurston's that in addition to the Wetland this parcel is also mapped as Waterfowl Concentrations, Saltwater Wetlands, and Shorebirds. Thanks for your help! j' incerely, Zoe Ann Lamp Associate Manner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 S' heridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98)68 Phone: 5 60-3 8 5-9406 Fax: )60-379-+47) Depce /2zos-- 1 35'937.2 _ . . !tgnnv.mar, 10-• 5.P. Y 2 fg lO R NASON SHORT PLAT SP 11-90 . • A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 SPACE er4grT It-0 Twp. 29, Rge. IE,W.M. Jefferson Co., Wash. C.41 , L 1A(LTA,Su,,,:i llaS 0EF.i (Being a Replat of Tracts 87 88, Irondale _ F°U: AL,ER PIT Opt o41.,,,r J I ' Acre Tracts per Vol 2 of Plats, Page 145 * p_,.:' ' +� ,'' <j HALL TAKE {'t Lr E., -- ';rNPCLtl... -:: ..:°_ Jefferson Co. Wash. TO Tq.'N�ENO YT 9U4J I. fI DE Y/G/N/TY 00 Y/////:�pPK OAS/S OF GEARING Ova SCALE) 11P PGk`T7 ''.BPJ jill 6/ASH/NG TON COORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH ZONE PER I 1pN AS ARe- CRP 9)] AERIAL MRPP/NG OP 'AA rNR ALSO r AS 0.°TERMLVCO BY MEA34REMENTS BETN/EEN TNC 1 1./EST QUARTER CORNER ANO THE NORTH!✓EST CO B. �__J NER OF 3ECT/ON ] TOf✓N3l1A 29 N,RANGE/E,w A7. AS DEPICTED NERCON. >a PORT LUOLON PLATTED R/W /CLEVELAND Sr MAP 61142446)-4-1 -.� 'Nl—, Q9[AACE0 INE 'VII //MrANarR LINE 9 88'/7'97"E 4G 50 !/—/ Asz.D6 oe_e.e /rc.rz ' '5 88'/7'57'E L r [41' - O00 rR.tcr /EASEMENT LOT 1 RWlI \'" ;�i]F,v. 6' oU >o ;� FOR "vil a� SERr/E 3.,4 A< sv�r.E • �° LOT 2 4 O tik? O/SPOJgL \ t r 0.93 AC. q "1ik `• AREA `i'" E�1$EI"7F/siT = ct O ?r FO 4'•l"NN/TC �R ��o /O'DFNIER ,.477 4' N..27-/V a �2 �fASEAENT ,}} /3..SVE a coke:'O NI•RO'1t AO_.....-""\10:4.. NEN AOO'N \SOG.eo_�. — _ / NOV /9'90'N' .i .- -20RNE•P 56e.4O -- II__ --WA! �,-yrNr, — 4.9800.___ N98'/9.3i7"+d LoO.00 d` 1 A FOR TA GE WAY (: G -- 5 94.24 N 98" /9' SO"Al 200.00 Fo ♦'.I"CONC. NON rv//COPPER ERR 48-90) a,-•,r ` MONUMENTAT/ON GEG£ND NOTE, SCHEME (NO SEA() •• SCT REBAR /L.S. 20492 ID CAR SEE SHEET 2 Or 2 FOR sr069.4 DRAINAGE `6 _ REQUIREMENTS. 9 p 0•FNO.L5.2146$ RE19ARcAP u V A 1 kJ V) a#y� p FIELD qC STAEMG-NTS MADE w/TN C e V !3`:' /^ TOTAL sTAT/q A/ 4VFRAREO SOAR 74 !4.4.' 23 '., (rnn,r AAR) 43/AIL FIELD TRN/ERSE ` V AND RRL/AL SURVEY METHODS.Y SW,NN,5EC.7 -- Y 1 Ue CLDSURE Ricers OR EXCEL-DS 19 f3 1 6AENNL ACCURACY STANDARD AS PER AMC. '/3 2 U 11 332-/50-090,PRRAGRAPNS/0,4 2(4). ✓ ga oO z 3 A PORTAGE WRY Y°• 466361-+.rr'r N 58-/1'SO 6, 641 7/ `rMOO NEE' TNP29N,RGf./E,ANJ E i SEE SH N EET 2 OF 2 1 Nonce i ;',V:-'LATTEC rD POriNr)AL PURCNASER3. o Lo ,eo No Xy R lJ ad') number s fee I n p auditors certificate number i surveyors certificate Y s cAgM filed for retard This of AFO/c ,lefL, at I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SHORT PLAT IS SAVED UPON A A� : ��,T2 ''' 04110 EVANS^owefsaaRTES. //A m. in booN-2.,_.01 p1015,a1 page/YO--fit ar the SURVEY,TEAT TIE COURSES AND DISTANCES ARE SHOWN COR E.- T i ..^.,,). •° e^•«-^^ request of Gfry P NASON THEREON,AND THAT ALL REQUIRED STAKES AND NONUN.II � ,,�0] t•dawn,190a c$wcd:Nd0C PLACED ON THE GROUND. ♦ . ' a sneer!d Z I .Atc 4-�L•: C./ . ,�rc/sr�i.� r2/z]/ AL.,-''.L.e..; 'P date, /z 26-90 Jefferson Canty Auditor by /�R+- deputy •N9D --6y{y� 5 VV/43 o C,; w aQ Qo ,a, 1 Ti i ■ o po CD C i... rn y a O • CD .c,x, ; to 4. V O co st * o 4\ yk A,. ! cn C f ' N N N N O1",' • '1 w w N-'d i Y; LA y T , :AiF ti 1 ' 3 ,_ AAAA ill 0) ■ 4. CD ^N 0 ^V V Page 1 of 1 Zoe Ann Lamp From: Barbara Blowers [waves@olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:01 PM To: Zoe Ann Lamp Subject: Nason SPAAD Portage Way The septic permit has finally been turned in and we are moving ahead again with this SPAAD. I think my next move is to reply to the WDFW comments regarding the site. I seem to have misplaced those comments. Could you e-mail me a copy so that I may formally respond. Thanks. Also, the two SPAADS on Seven Sisters Beach Road should also be moving ahead again as the septic permits are now ready to turn in. Let me know if there is anything you need from me as we try to finish this work. Barbara Blowers CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 962700108 Printed: December 21, 2005 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner ZON05-00059 MLA05-00737 NASON P Application Received: 12/21/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Sight Plan Advance Determination No findings,conditions, or permissions found. PRE05-00049 BLOWERS M Z Application Received: 11/14/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 11/29/2005 Case Finaled: NISWONGER SPAAD No findings, conditions, or permissions found. RAP05-00313 NASON P Application Received: 12/21/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: ROAD APPROACH AND 911 - PORTAGE WAY No findings,conditions, or permissions found. SEP94-00153 NASON C Application Received: 4/27/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/24/1994 Case Finaled: septic system to serve this lot is located on lot 1 of short plat, #962700107 1.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 2.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given. 3.) Curtain Drain required a minimum of 10' upgradient of primary and reserve drainfields. 4.) 30 ft. setback downslope of mound area to be maintained to protect infiltrative surface. 5.) Dry season installation required. 6.) Low use water fixtures required, 1.6 gal. flush toilets and 2.5 gpm shower heads. 7.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. 8.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 9.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 10.) Divert all sources of drainage away from septic tank and drainfield area. 11.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 12.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 13.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of a building permit on this site. Page 1of1 Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 962700108 11/15/2005 Owner Mailing Address: FRED P NASON DONA 0 NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 Site Address: Section: 7 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 211 Planning area: Tri-Area (4) Sub Division: NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC I LOT 2 I 1 1 x n� � n o� :—,fit. r � � s�. http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=96270010... 12/21/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 3 Features Not Surveyed 1/1s-,P-1 462 MON 7 562700097 yti2 N.Y.XY ! • / i 960300005 0002 t 9984Occob 96630004.1 Usr:•rarckd aj_c+'Ur:m C CANE)....0-77.11 Slrrce http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 12/21/2005 • CC O II O = O C3 L1_ CV CYO Jn Z Ll_ Z- co H O C ) II — __--- —7 O r— O „— ti - - -- d- ` O D � - ^ : Q ci- ) - CU C3 = - O — CO C= 4C M e Cr O J U 0 0 I— LLI 0 0 _ g •- -I--' _CD H Cr) C3) - l N .. O - J. = U r— CC _CI U U U CC W = O G 0 J CL C1 I— F— O U LID O CV CO CA 0 O Cr) U I LU O(O J IL L LI J CI_ CL x 0 CL LJJ I—C)C L.L_ x I--=O CO CO M- LJJ = Cr Cl.) C= O Cl) ) C - O CC O CD CD Z J CC ++ ^1 U LL_ 0 CO LL -I_J O CO CD CO O CD O CD Cr) CD N - O CU UD CO Q CO 07 = CO O CU 0 `— 0 CV 0 O O L — N- O U Cl.) CV CO 1:r C O O CI) L 3 L CO Y O — Q) O -I--0 CD CZ Cl) Q) 3) CD -— 3) Z J= CL) C) (O CD -O 7 CO C.) L CZ — O CO CZ C_ C) CU X -I--I U -O X (O CO CL CO -- -- CO O I— F— x q- I— up (v 4- ) x F— - l ,/ A` /n i• ,. oN p ---1 .b, mss: 1 ";.- ' i.'I �- �t r . 1 S - ,.rte 5 . . OC-3 N 1 iiiiiial 1 ,„'/ N 0 N . 1 mIIII.A.. 4,, . , 1 ,,,, Thep, all,0••• 11111.-eilill. i . 4,„,„• _ ■ ri. i NN.....N N� I O..,, N 111.111r-lirill114(j) 10 I 1 o � I 1 E N N 110 N. \N 1 c- f. NP 1 0o lIll '' -' ;A ti \ a �'T ` k 4 y41111 . +S1" •S. , N 2''En y z Q 2 0 -,,, :t-,',:.,,,4,4. s :4 , s � a ` .j k` fir .+-- , �_ w , " � --c) m b q . it 441 y O �j O Cp ill C) O O . Ye. `� a ti , r, , -.�.'�.�r-rj co . AAr)--� m - � • k e U•.Z � 2 p L+ m cr, ° fia m d4 . D E ,,-6 •r O C 2 +� r . • C 'fi �� y N . O m p02 b i �h ', o m 0 �z m m z y .° � NOL' ``,�h ma Nile IN ti m o n `R IN.)ID m b m� m �m vi • p / / g / FRED & JUDY NASON REVISIONS DATE er '1`111.1 " N W SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN DRAINFIELD AREA SITE PLAN ENGINEERING. INC. $R r = PARCEL NO. 962-700-108 ' , ,M j �/ - -issrw4 7c•i/HIM IR -1.593Z2- 11L1✓..•:;.I'%II I. 1 /4 - i .P. rot 2 �� 8 I I s . : ' ! DEC 21 2005 �, NASON SORT FLAT SF H - So A 1.0101011 CV CRTeenerlen1 LOT 2.MOTION 1,IGYYIIr M 110R!µRAMA I EMT,DLLATETIE HWD4Y4.MMON GOUTY,WAWMOTON C GEIY ALTO A IRAT 0 A POMICM Q TUOT6 If■C EPA.erAOALE ACME TRACTS,PM vQlfT 3 O RATE.PAM!Ile,RECCOO6 O S1161601 Cony UYNIWGTOI LICIALIZMCIIrMal GALL kalintd1 Ad Po pods.of Tr.0 be and ON portion or Tract II lying EMYwy of IS 1014MNg T1qw potonono.of*Kt El ad Tract M of*noble 4i.Tract&per plot rot 1.41nd0 N WNE7M IM•V,N w pet d wens A0.Tract*pen It.ON d..d recorded At Co4M)d Piat..t Page ME.%word.of J ['YL Y\wMY 1'II,6w-don pig.M!.N Von..1 of Plata,boom.Of J.II.e*Lowy YWO01a1 of Govan*La 3.N Action 1,T.Orp M Mend Ida da0St.d..Mead LI••a•.bealroine at A paid on the WMdwy IWY of Mid Trot(1. Ma pow being MOS lest NaNwy of the SoaIat.y Carr of MI0 Tract 51 Pence noting A M•.30-11•E. •04000 .F.0611 f..to Pe Gww..wl1 M.i..*r Lim W`wlu of wale LN.•a•. O0w.cng Al U.Sondes*Come.of •1•Conroe 1 We.&or-L'-Wen,•boy 0.Wooly Lama of Mid bonbon 1,•*Nora of 2.MA2 Net bow 16..1 V4 001W town.N Jarrow*Co.4$WMM5Oton of wawa Ewctbe 1*boo Il Of H'-M'E.Aw.O out Wray Lank a 0045 of 3000 rid.*nee 1E Y'-Y3,0.I.a dwYY of 6000 1w to W 41045... Goma.*u.Trace Y..M MA rood R 1264 HM Pone N o4'-16'-4111E. Along Or ENI.y*Agin of CWN.b Ellen,W Ww.t.y LIYb Of T.O.Y alb el. •*.Wt.10103 I...Nola••12-12'-31•E•dnwae of 61610 fan to W ETOIH Dr4wade RAW 5.10500 Gwarmat Mee*Leto ul.r•6.04'-3•']f•E_.loom Mb Meer.Line •*dodo of 3401*el,theme N"'MP-MI E•b.6 Mb Awn*ISO.•*ounce All M.N.O.n.M.reef w.od.of rep*moo.w.wnvM re J'v I,peM1NO orle 110 rem,tea IL 3Y-M'-]Y E.•woe Mb Hoot.L.r..Moor of 0M fen, rob,w eel.PIMA lend r ced wear.NE N.dw.cw wag.•e•y.d*POMO Avon &1 of E.. 01.au.r 3us3rr u w w Nee wrEw d Pwg.YYy tl. c1*v*5,60 Feet raw PLYL III.**Won..pee wet I..l.tb1 plot M Mu .4 d.l N dWIegs N Mid pee d Venable ast n•c.Y.AfI•]O•-5W'Pe we prow* Nee*ad q.o.M ey w*Moot Cot. alb*.=ant ar eel•wZ p. .q a MAW' of ee rwQ.wry.dwau of Han l6 T b 0 n the tore of Ice• pool*.d cw.4Wrn M a rutrlae or *her 00 la Id d Cam.N..W Tat E►d.ov It l•-FJ'AO'Sc• V. MA N Wide* d Mle Pause Way ear mWl.y LOU d told Trace Mt a* of feet ew.ount ye 0w. . C�Ra WM r.4..ad APE*..tae by 0.•r..* Goent6 Mooed And -1 0 D ab'llold.6 O tow d No occepercy pared bee.Per PONT OP 00661•111.6 1n.0y two bete*I'1 0 WI raddled by ILO.614 Wpp D. plat Pot II.. .you w too word w re.erRry rut war wtvlte 010•pprw.d prow tr.au N Jana.Ce Cooly rdAgla. h...M�ti.r.'p+f1.L'Py of•110ff ,wart. • ABAIIC l Peer,.Zlf.:f 4 re d eeeeeeeeeee leo.`p..we by urn peen.Pet 4 to w..g.4 ae.w ear SL.'• 'Po -• La.'1:. Mops re pw.eM.of WS IoM lwa dawri ad dal term O Olt wn1 E.don pee.ad We.•.Paolo-Tlu.d doom to be arm Of y low r.and Come* 1!D ARE= N Woee he**l beA,y Mt y low IW pyday of..12(4 n fp I,110 11110Ynt Nemo.of Mrynw Cway.W.M.reun Hoek,rattly Wt MI real property taw due rWor deports remand b cove.wlcv.m • .0,-peeper% N Ow.Halo/e. M1.0.6.0 bald.v to ��P. N{.on I.f. ..a.. Tr _. - dALIMLEDfBFHI Coto of awewgerA ) Hwa Cooly of JMrrw.. ) yj �'�" �" II*w to uddy...t*dy2g!a.y.f �O*..R qQ.*More...Pe �� 4 A.'d.netee,•*day r+rlM,per...ly appeared ON P.w..n r..1.1000 E....d* p.'..d tlwz•0. or r rf// It!/ W woo.d.clrerww end.a.rd0w■to no WI r.�aNpperd�eld waled M.*MO rrr weluetena ee.and dead r.the ear awl pops** .1•••••• 1/" x f - t� ..1.d rn w w*one*t....au Mb I.Vtated. P�!'tl'e r•+E'+y4��D...tn .�M. 1 Pawl tn.deep•a yew non Aar**erMtn :.n .dR,! ,A E'a.l�p adepp..'.d w.2J d.y.r(]a�'Jda�r��n4L •! r 4.4 Dnc4cu N Cow*N.NJI vfP.°.• try TM� eaulww empire**oldies *LTC!TO Tdrl4 PLIFICNAMMe �( '''r L LOTS CREATED 1qr WALL 1407 GE"Wean OIVIDEO M 00'el * E.•,51.d a O Oval Wy$}?day of -A 21 W■M A PgMW COMM Id YEA.WT1Wf NO ALM*O A Mee.!LOtl _yeaf1R ..' RAT.. JMrawa Coley Mite 5•5.Wp• •.a Dwd10. I.A 0E16.E10 1l.PMFE•ET..t BM ram POR LOT 2■CWt PRW WIEEM D05 T!ETWEM*YET at WA/up C214016I5LT NMI M PROAW00 Cr NO MOM!.M RPM M 0ILI0 None O!YEAR Mae NOVLMOCR C•4.10.A TRAMP PIDOSIAL It Per.ITen PON A MAMW4 O ILO(3)TEAR IPet ETDAKW Oa**EE*■01 /..A:YetlCAiE OI•OEAL 440501!!N NOT 611.60.60111110 Y0 M EIlalpT TO 1401148 APPROVAL O A 1!!560 Kends COMMA.MRILAICM(CMTAGT PT I* rao rid d.ANC EVMr a AG[CCIATED INC,Pet TAE JOwN1E0 4 GAVOT KALTM DEPARRp1TI d•y d n alma _r.a. lk- 11.0 lob d .vodi N veW d b10Rf rtAlt.P•W1 M- J Rwrab d L 90Y 1l4OVAL O,Ole MAHd1 0414.,4140E O Eta.Ernes M PO JMIw.*Cary YrM..B1.P DRAW.LLD ARA0 MAY CRATE WTE 000(110411441431 III.ccrplAna Pon 114 WTALLATIOI Q EE41*01 DIW9:Me5 0101070 NO COLD *VAL DAZE M(*111A611 DIEPCMAL PEREI, Cary 4A.w a,ND POr4RE W1E1.wrf1 IS PIIOVpED M INA*WM RAT.CRY 6.P.Iy CP POT 1CWR@D WAIL**AVALA0LE ACNOMNI TO UM WTE 3 ACC!» OV10 ALWT40t Ida1 Aro ;R/ern,'V 00*0 -C ���J) a. JMrA.on catty A"•°''"9"'°� SHEET 2 OF 2 / a 3 a s•., . E• r 5.P.A. 2. .1$Q_. ( �-2 • r _ ► : I te R ! , ` RFC 9 1 7nnr; i ,)1• I.NASON SHORT PLAT SP 11-90 .__ A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 SPACE:a �Ar 1, roll Twp. 29, Rge. IE,W.M. Jefferson Co., Wash. -.,,PI' ,snit :. , RE.f FLn/rr pc M (Being a Replat of Tracts 87 88, Irondale 1{MTL.A. •SITA.4IRYn.t T1F OPr Mi •- ‘P',;" nDV' pa:•pip Mrt •CCs,N"rwen. .1% Acre Tracts per Vol. of Plats, Page 145 T �t =�_� Fa uM'r, ALTA R AT OW,OM:P!•n T,ag P 9 V OC7i:• c..Ml1T•.KR MA"C. Jefferson Co. Wash. , mSENO i• L1 V/C/N/TY I ,O e i 'OAK MAP ra E (NO SC. E) I ! 9( 1g ' ppv g1/13/3 Of 4EARM/6 pa: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH ZONE Pee le' T/7/ AREA CR. AT AER/qL MRPP/NO OF /900. AC 50 AS DersRMWrD 8Y MEAOUREMCNT, BETWEEN THE • N'5.57 OLNWTER CORNER AND THE NORTHWEST CPR- __J NCR OF SECTION 7, TOM/NSNPP 29 N.,RANGE /E.4/M AS OCPKTCO NeRCON. Po! • C uOLOM "ATM" A./A, CLfVECANG ST Mara «f AggACCO W T f . .1 // .K0NDER L/NA- 8 H0• /7'37-e K.x' , ae. 2 5 OW/7'37-E 31.Di —T tf•N'.!,'l�I 'sR47" ' z G4- n,� •i ..-__50.,,,cop, TRACT Of 1 a wi:•P'trig' Y 1 I. 1 7PE1J ' o/Aw , `M FOR MENT LOT 1 O �_ 0 W o� x;, �cE LOT Z b3 a�`•1�gjgj seem y,Il.RC t t EASE r 0.e9 Ac. Va 4d' .4 °vv ARG V �Tk **."..'l 40 � i,� i,s ; ID l'..••AWN, \\\\1T.yi Go T CA3a M \*' _ 1 / .9 AO' /9'DO'W "' -- -- 7aL v Mwn+aT AT '1--A FOR TAOE - 500 00 894.el Nee- /9' - ) W \ -FD. •-.•'CONE ICON ICON..-/COPPER • 64R (0-90) MONUMENTATION LEGEND NOTE CREME !A0 SCAGE) •• xi- REBAR '/L 5. 20412 /O 0 P SEE SNEET 2 or 2 rcw STORM DRAINAGE REOUIREMENT.T. 3 O•r,r•.3.1,415 rretuf 1 of --- le 9tI F- TO MEAT7 FRW TS MADt W/TN (4 .;� 3 85 t. TDTAC J7/3/AG wrztrA RCO V/4 • k (rKn,zn.,+l W/NG F/fC0 TRA✓ER3E 74 i' ‘ AND M4O/A. JURYCY ATC7710QT. SN,NN,SEC.7 r V V 1 y CLATURe ricers OR EXCEL-04 ���� -- u 7 HH 1 t ACCURACY SrArcARO P.O PER A/AC MEM. j 2 ( 03&-/9P090,PAR,90AAPN5 I(A91A)• Y9:Ql ■■.. • 0�r!I_4 ~TAM MMY 'r", acola./Y)". fie: T4N?E9N,RfaC IClb`/ �"� 0,9-If S0•N •44 7/ lapM J•• ',Mier 2 If 2 FoR monde 11 UN PLAT TED re Aors,n.0 F•wCNASeRS. o Lo NO Yy SCALE I-•90• Yi auditors certificate: ,..,,a, ifs SUNeyors cEl iicote` tiled bt r•cad M• f aq of ANIL IRtL, at .SVESr CuTtTI THAT me MOAT PLAT s lL 5 oral � TL >, yorr„r,,Wpylp„a BA M. M Eoak�`of pots,r•pagr zar-'iLe IN WPM;TWAT'ow WM.L P M O CRTM•Cp ANC'MOW" T�1[ (itr P A/IS'•N THEREON,A•O TINT ALL AMP= STAKU ISO "}Mr rpesf d Y ` �� i�Za�•f . - PLACED Cr TN[l•Or•w. a. ' t164 ._ aw/d 1 . T aN�rrY i2�1T I APO �.� 1 iJ 'sr dew 5'24-90 Jefferson Covey Auditor by .9 e 5VV/45 R. W 111111111111111111.1111iiiimilmioni . , SCALE 2IN.=1M1. METSKER MAPS TOWNSHIP 29 N ., RANGE P.O. Box 110669 Tacoma, WA 98411-0669 1997 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASH ft t■ (206) 588-5222 . . s 6 ...,, , !,0 ,,..,.. . ,„...% ,. .. . : \ I i.' f I/lti v..4. \' ‘`, =Pa E''AN. „i,,,,E_0=KM :.1. ....-• ,, •.,Wcgrffi° ■., . . . - • i—1- — \:' "-: \• 4' Vi- \‘'''':-•■ .M- = li • • . -•-•. .. :......: „.. ., • ---- .r9enson 4, . - ,.... , ,s, I • ' ' , A ,. ",•:,...-: I.IGN.Ir A., .....1. 1 N Hill i_ 1,_ - •' ' '... • Illikr46:11V10111•411-al 1114110■"‘:..,!, • ‘ 2.•-•;4107.\•11.,\tt'■;„( \ . 322' --- , 54.7 '' .., '' '--7':137L‘_,i,.s., 1111ailfil ';Nodule . ,..x ••• ., •• ".--.1:•'.X:::,l'Aft. u 5 •VA L T---- ' 5• • : • I--.1 uir-ziorainillEal ' . ' 'i ' 1.11Er I Point ' Allp.'-'•:';" RE5ER 1-1014 '::•- : l. ' ' . •• -,1,=• MI Ho . ti&MIRI.: -.7 ; 544A1- -.. MKS 12=Erl ‘■ I ..(* '' • • L. INEZ TM lir v. . . 10.33 •h. ,, , I I/ /,, ,.. k ' 1‘. % \ tz, •A:. . '04F 1.1 111k.‘t0 V. 1)1' ' i - ,• • .:..".•.'''AZTAII Alr'' 4 EEEFLTS • .:'i '. 11111. : \\\\ \ * •'" ' -In,.. . . .,. . r As MI-4' • ' . .. , tE • SI 1 •A`\' " lmmor '4 1 : .: .; : . , faigkiiii Leila= Mil .. . ......, ,‘,4 ..1,..- , ' .11 MIR/,..•:-.1 ( .0 .,.., • . 14111111! 114 'j. 1.. 4 -,r_---, __L-....,. :•.,..-,.-,-, : -.. . 1-- - a =,. ..,- ...ffoi R 9911 da' t Ellri7'''. -*.''. • ‘1410:: ' Lb 15' 3e k .j..2 hTesitT,1::14 Ea 1-• 'I' `?' ' ..' I, ..1-04.4" ...S •..;■ 4.•;.% .• v-.)T, . 16' •.. ES > . rilmil 0 2 41 '.4 0 OVA .. ■ 1 'L = lificRhAcrE\E TFwoNT - R. W SR . . --- - $0E.NNI- p, :.....1- ,.,, ---:-.., , L._ ._.-Im L,. ... 1 ..EEN ,.tticg.„_ .R." ,..„ = Lipltp j..or //AMA'''' . ... *''.', ... ''..--.',.".......!. q all En RO .WS riE", '-"t4,, r.0.75..7i-;,.. . . .., . ..,. ' -VI', . -' ''. ' 1.11111,..41:, ,..,,.a..i in■LE. • . OA.K --Cabins. i%,-,.,- -..,',..,': fiv„a , „.,... , :,.o . N,.... .„0-,1 Ao 3 EM V ..• " .. .,. •. I Allillith"11111 .. . ...1 JAcrat-E■J‘ 3/3 . ; I. ' ', istA y" ,. .-.,..- .., ., s.. .:,... A . . Knnej Poini 1 VOL 4--....,.. .:•-. . . : BUOY 7 , x Ca 61.0.4.N 1.•‘14C '' . . - 11111 • P o PE REILooRCE.5 L 0.J SILVESTRI L.,.•.. & , 0 ... . ,• , 414 GASPERS •3*' -I, I PoPr- R65V‘'g- Crmo.o II II : AON i I AIIIIIIII? vliik T.41"----RIPE_La'. 0 " 16...", =`,. . - . '. 9044(71 :sat. 4:41 ..,, .!ill x..war v LIIIII4 Pe PV m" ‘r al:714110/S PoLS .6 MIIIIIIII■:W11 ..., lit ,,,,, • , !ogle -r-p,0•44- ".z.ita",... <z,re :441 ingoweji,,ILI.. ;-,.. 42.5$ OAK BAY WATERFRONT s • .!. -' \ TRACTS !TAM o '. 0 W •_1 .ell •••#,,-1,,,, s\o" .5Tor• 411 0'.-..../ ',•;. ,. 42. • 2 0 . 1 0''' 5.''' , A \\Ili', ,i • , , , .•.... ml° 4.24ialliii111111 0. NI -• •,lign, iz 11I 1I111 FOREST 2 PuaET PA - iklooLANIO ifera -V 1 Allgt 1:2133 0.4c. I 1!-,:- .....•. pa131-1:5:55' AlpiN65811311111.12GRE' E°117... °(- e.. Pri I + ,. , I MC Li-,\\ AWICE --- Z E .../h MI 'ME IF rigiFi 4100 Win A.NE. FOR E07- > 4 _z.12 ;t4 o .. /, -r c u PLIGA INC. k IIIII H. MMI IMIlrillille: — ° . Klas Rk. • ---... 41dIE 1 ')) iesa`:'°- • ‘.EE'R.er. .: ' :..\ ,,,,,,. . . a •- -. -c 1 I MEI Li haiti[gl -E.- ,ifil 4- • „N Z.,:.' (..) 48.5.51 I .. 4'''24.- 1:11 e't' A0A-rAwesTA 43a sa It 0 Alik EVERGR- 1111, Rikt,.... < 0,. 1 .0 ...own...ATI ',. • * .0 W EEN IN co -POInt • r•••• BRA LI — . ' * q . -i---i--/- ‘ ... . E aim -,..,7‘72-4 lUal;''..•:•:'. lo..,...* 'ez°_2.....) . IFNI A* 44 2.2 31,3 R i N ,, , ,LtGAT 0 It;6.7.3. to a.tla, 00204440 *-t:..t. a li' Ail' 0 ..•.% , ....:.'. '5'" .4 r To Port Lu• ow COPYRIGHT BY THOS. C. METSKR , Illiogisp AIIIIIIL Mit 1 lin r-, •••tk,tp, 0,,,,t--\--: - --roil.,,-,-, ,,,•;.:" , •v; ,P•0-..k.,,,,...t,,,,,,.,,. l'I.,,,;',:,,,, . - + ,.„,:,4*I'.0 L.•sI-'.: .I".". ' .., AL, 1-00% ..,, ... i ; g2iMR: g I —$ m Y o9° ;--1 aiii- °` .• 1 .$ A -"- am g ga v; ;;; — tom '08 g C I b LOT n LOT ee I A (4E1/4 12 - 29% - 111 1--..LW. uTLOT tl I lm 11� ^� CLEVELAND SHILL.' 26.1.1.30 "' u na l''' a I Ii a 2. v6 e6E fO N5a "6 a .140 I • ; ' tI IRON ;i , E Pi I. ACRE ! a i i • m � . LOT 7 11 °e 2 E a LX:> G: T ••` PE" iiiE 07 e ...,• .aa fgCOO j 1 ti C g� > S' 1 W^Y U O r 4 V 8� C a IN ?� L N ��o e 7 i' i o ;g v 4.iv Al Raj '�— I' 1 '%11- 1, 1 ,,--/ 14, o g� Z , ()' j 4?s 04:k 3 7 i + DEC 2 1 2005 s ' `������ .z cr) , ay > v da PR�siro (I) \ P �m3S"o 'p R U) 0NW 0 AT ' n2 / .i N (NE1/� 7 - 2N - 1E) G Z ° 333 , 333 03% ND to NJ \ S S a y 3 P 7 g Z °m �I Z J • C\-'1 '0 -o m al `. 0) O O m _ �" 'm a) 1S C t m � N � o ca lr m co a' � o = m m m m m o o p cu o ca o E ° m QE m . am a- 92 , C E \ am acct U .r > oC a� i a �' a � Q� \ Q � p m rn ro o m m n = E E E E °- «. .m. -U c C O CD U, E 2 C O Co C O c E M CO o_ m m ° o• r E - \ E - m o Q.c E �' m P C E ;o E io \ E in E E U m E m o o m 'm ,m LU o to •O 0 6 0 0 oar, j `n �' m _ cn a-0 0 p m C C m m . -0 E -- nm Q a ., 0 p m c m E.' _ � u, c 5 , m N 3 0- m E U W H co m 6•i 76 -2 C r N "U O O p° a s E a m o m Y U c a as co ° �c� 0 d Y 0 c O m m m '��'``c E =' a' m m a C E C //co m C\ -a)--.R m a) Eo 'w m 0 CD 0 -� H O m m C �j a 0 e,� •N •.`- C v- s'" C � O C N 4 na 4-_-.° E • m �N. a °i > ° o 0 " O 'O O m O N ,q O - v1 O t6 I I d � .`- YO CO 1 O 3 N O ( � ° as N ■ a) N m a. n' N O m 0 0 m 1.0 ) °`i c O m En O m RS p c6 U t p o t p c,, m -,?3) a ( v ar k'ar to Q° - a� ,_ QIn L' a 0 0 Q m C m CO CO a m 0 m y E ° C c_ a, o -0 0 m 'i -o al a ,.3 -o ro ctl H a o ° °' o I E . o o o UE ° E °CZ 6 °� o -o E ° aa)) m v rni, m °° CD Y '� C N >_ co ' C m m m m m C m z C 'C .- 0 crS L2 '- C 0 C (6 C cc$ '� C (6 RS a m a m a ro Q Ls d a L-. -o co co co ca L. O a -O -o p O o .O o o O O p O com U C Q N .O. U u E 10 3 ° a a a Q u ED_ U ° o E E E E a ti .° - ° 0 0 o E Ii 0 N cc] o O ti T n CD N n n L- H T H H F - o J m 1-6 o Q C Q m W 0_ it V) c L L O N ca O O c .3 "3 ,i-o-N r p 0 //� O Y t m as y > m a) o ? N cn as 1,CL N ■ * O-I ' •• \ o m m \ O O + N 0 a)c c . 4= V d m n 0 CD mc m 'c m ` o o ° _m o as co m e c _ .Y -o o m o ° o as a � N b ;m aa) a =m is a) 12 ) O G p , c .p,'4 CJ p .4) t L * 0 p = ° Q 2 o o � r -0 c cc6 C (ST CCi fn L_ CD O C O C C to C �. C m �.� 'O C I p O RS m N O a3 O N ._ C t O O a3 Q. U rn N m aS• s L 3 QLL T m a) O CD v - 6 ct 0 m ,_ °) L a) i Cl) 3 'c Ca N o d m N i s 0 i•0 -� N 0 y a) 0 _m t d m 0 p O O Q O (�) 10 C O O fl.. C U m m O oaE a E Qo aos "-) a) 6s as ccu ate) v 1a n° m m a) co 0 c E a) o c S'' .o Q o a > D o T:-.D m ca ( 0�o ° amiC7 a° _m � � Cl m ' rnoo > Q -0 y J E ,._. x 0 W '- L., •y o 2 N Z o a Q c>_.' .O O C � O / . N.- co '. O N n7 %. _a I _ d C n Q E o ± d O U 121 0 U �C v O Q N a)cl C G G Q b oC 1 •?.-° c [ :o c a v c cc°' W m e ^e v, o 0 u Page 1 of 2 Zoe Ann Niswonger From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:38 PM To: Zoe Ann Niswonger Subject: FW: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel From: Randi Thurston [mailto:thursrlt @dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:34 PM To: dixie @cablespeed.com Cc: Stacie Hoskins Subject: Oak Bay Estuary Parcel Recommended wetland buffers were established based on a review of Best Available Science (BAS) to protect the functions and values of wetlands. As a result of the BAS review, a 150—foot buffer width is currently required for Category 1 wetlands in Jefferson County's Critical Areas Ordinance. An ecotone or edge is a place where two different plant communities meet. This junction is either a boundary or transition zone where plant and associated wildlife communities interface. The buffer around the wetland is the bridge between the upland habitat and the aquatic environment. The ability of the areas to attract and support wildlife is dependent on the structural and functional integrity of the three interrelated ecosystems: aquatic, riparian, and upland not just to the wetland itself. Both Best Available Science for recommended buffer widths for Category 1 wetlands and riparian functions in marine ecosystems indicate much larger buffers than 50 feet are needed to protect wetland/riparian function which include fish and wildlife habitat. In 1997, WDFW published Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Nearly 1,500 pieces of literature on the importance of riparian areas to fish and wildlife were evaluated, and land use recommendations designed to accommodate riparian-associated fish and wildlife were developed. Although the document focused on lotic systems, the attributes that contribute to the diversity and abundance of terrestrial wildlife , in marine riparian areas are the same as those for lotic systems and include: • structural complexity; • connectivity with other ecosystems; • abundant food source and available water; • moist and moderate climate. WDFW Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats: Riparian published December 1997 summarizes the riparian habitat functions or specific wildlife uses, organized by riparian habitat width. Many of the riparian habitat functions/parameters are applicable to subject property. Appendix C (attached) from the document, gives the riparian habitat function and the recommended buffer, associated with that function along with the source document. The recommended buffer in almost all cases far exceeds the 50-foot buffer proposed. Buffer widths needed to protect wildlife using wetlands generally range from 100 to 600 feet or more. As you pointed out the subject property is obviously a disturbed site. Land clearing and filling is often an avenue for expansion of non-native invasive plant species which colonize disturbed areas. Non-native invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry in the case of this site and Japanese knotweed out-compete native plants and displace wildlife associated with those native plant communities. Land clearing and filling also results in a loss of structural diversity (multiple canopy layers, and a well developed shrub layer) that provides nesting, breeding, and hiding cover and food for wildlife. Pesticides and fertilizers used for residential application and sedimentation from land clearing can impact water quality in the wetland. In addition, land clearing alters the microclimate. Likely impacts that will result from home construction include increased noise and light that will affect wildlife 12/19/2005 PRE05-00049 Post Meeting Update Nason SPAAD Attendees: Barbara Blowers, Agent; Linda Atkins, EH; Stacie Hoskins, DRD; Terry Duff, DPW; Zoe Ann Niswonger, DRD Friday, November 18, 2005 10:00 am Agent: Barbara Blowers Owner: Fred and Dona Nason P. O. Box 1668 61 Portage Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9735 Phone: 360-385-6860 Description of Proposal: SPAAD - Parcel 962-700-108 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - LAND USE • Zoned - RR 1:5 • Parking (UDC Section 6.10) - Two parking spaces are required for each residence. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: • Shoreline Designation - Conservancy; Show OHWM and 30 ft. setback on site plan. • Stream - Mapped Type 3 Stream; Dixie Llewelyn will address in her wetland delineation report. If the stream exists it requires a 100 ft buffer plus 5 ft. bldg. setback from buffer; Type 1 stream along shoreline (not applicable unless code changes) • Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Waterfowl Concentrations, Saltwater Wetlands, Shorebirds (Two Agency Packets Required at Application - DCD will send to WDFW & DOE), Habitat Management Plan required; • Wetland Wetland delineation and habitat management plan required at time of a pp lication - The report should address the project as a whole (septic, stormwater, buildings, revegetation, etc.); • Flood Zone - Flood elevation certificate (not required for SPAAD approval, but is required for development) • Seismic Hazard • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ) - Coastal; • Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Bulk & Dimensional Standards • Building Height: 35' maximum • Maximum Lot coverage: 25% • Minimum 20 ft. setback from Portage Way right-of-way • Minimum 5 ft. side setback • Shoreline setback - The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet. Application & Fees: • Two (2) Agency Packets required at time of SPAAD application. Each agency packet shall include: copy of Master Permit Application, copy of site plan, Metskers Map with project location highlighted or site location map, copy of Assessor's Map with parcel highlighted, copy of habitat management plan. • *4aste. n e 1/4 t A__ r pk T ion,'St n, . - - - • 1 of - - } t d n, -• •• _ - - --. --ptic enginger. G:\PermitCenter\ZoeAnn\DRD\Pre-Application Conference\PRE05-00049 - Nason - Nov 18, 2005.doc Page 1 of 2 • Fees: $196.00 for DRD review, $147.00 for RAP, $212.00 for Environmental Health. Total Fees Due at application: $555.00. If applying for a septic permit at time of SPAAD application, fees are $436.00 for Septic Permit, $196 for DRD, $147.00 for RAP. Total Fees due $779.00. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT (Linda Atkins - phone: 360-385-9444): • Soil Logs prepared by a licensed septic designer or profession engineer. • Each residence requires a minimum of 240 gpd septic capacity. Consequently, 2-one bedroom homes and 1 satellite bedroom (no kitchen facilities) would require a minimum 600 gpd (5 bedrooms). PUBLIC WORKS (Terry Duff - phone: 360-385-9160): • A Road Approach Permit is required for access off of Portage Way. • The address may be applied for at the same time as the road approach. G:\PermitCenter\ZoeAnn\DRD\Pre-Application Conference\PRE05-00049 - Nason - Nov 18, 2005.doc Page 2 of 2 PRE05-00049 Nason SPAAD Attendees: Linda Atkins, EH; Stacie Hoskins, DRD; Terry Duff, DPW; Zoe Ann Niswonger, DRD Friday, November 18, 2005 10:00 am Agent: Barbara Blowers Owner: Fred and Dona Nason P. 0. Box 1668 61 Portage Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9735 Phone: 360-385-6860 Description of Proposal: SPAAD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - LAND USE • Zoned - RR 1:5 • Parking (UDC Section 6.10) - Two parking spaces are required for each residence. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: • Shoreline Designation - Conservancy; -show oN+am 'f � s.ik (`' • Stream - Type 3 Stream; 100 ft buffer plus 5 ft. bldg. Setback from buffer;Type 1 stream along shoreline (not applicable unless code changes) ` Dticie-u',\'t` ""-' 22 • Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Waterfowl Concentrations, Saltwater Wetlands, Shorebirds (Aen Packet Required at Application); b k } 'l4 wtFW -t' DoE �^ Wetland - Wetland delineation and habitat management plan required at time of application; • Flood Zone - Flood elevation certificate (not required for SPAAD approval, but is required for pit�tf development)0.04.4 Seismic Hazard AA Of • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ) - Coastal; • Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Bulk & Dimensional Standards • Building Height: 35' maximum • Maximum Lot coverage: 25% • Minimum 20 ft. setback from Portage Way right-of-way • Minimum 5 ft. side setback • Shoreline setback - The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet. Application & Fees: alt AS¢.v-ci • Master Permit Application, Site Plan, Water Availability Notification, Wetland delineation and habitat management plan, Road Approach Application, soil logs prepared by a licensed septic 1 designer or professional engineer • Reasonable Economic Use Variance may be required to develop this parcel. • Fees: $196.00 for DRD review, $147.00 for RAP, $212.00 for Environmental Health. Total Fees Due at application: $555.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT (Linda Atkins - phone: 360-385-9444): 2 a'- • Soil Logs prepared by a licensed septic designer or profession engineer. �� tY1n. PUBLIC WORKS (Terry Duff - phone: 360-385-9160): "tor- -W • A Road Approach Permit is required for access off of • The address may be applied for at the same time as the road approach. G:\PermitCenter\ZoeAnn\DRD\Pre-Application Conference\PRE05-00049 - Nason - Nov 18, 2005.doc Page 1 of 1 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surve ed 1 -12107zcac2 i I 962700094 f I; 1, //r i 901121004 / i 8Qt0T2001�r�� ti f / 962700106 i r'- � 921072001 .Y:.. 11{! /) } ,H 962 700095 ? J 'I' w / 79 f 1`' 962790099 r I �5 �' 962700096 ` f f �/ �. 962700097'` J 11 I 962700078 962700097-9627,30094'-' 62 7 I+ . r + 962700113 ;fl . • Legend I CISW '- 962700112 9627001 r'',/ Selected Features �,f 962700075 a 902700111 If �'; �,r Road System l 41-. I 962700110 2 2 0 �� .1 /it Parr-tits-44 .N------ 1 i41i I, 962700106.-� Contours �' 962700107 I, 062700077 it'.i, Il+ — -. . of 10 eaa Cmvr r `` // 50 FaatCaaur_ J Chi _: 'fit Boundaries c9627000 3 998400017.c99840000'3 t 1+ O JlssmCUray r 960300003 . \\, ‘........, 16 .4 ± was 84 i 99:__-.. 5 IF E Oho-canto ri S 998400015 ,rte_-p 960300004 II-- 996400006 II--1 �% 998400012—1 ''�, 1 921073018 \`998400011`' g— Willi1 W 990400009'x--,.1 962700072 ff L \16030001 t. . 96030001 �. 1073017 t`.. 960300013. j ''� j � 960300014, - 960000029;` Yap.Omdsd trp Jebsm Cant'Cenral Sav aas GE9Q1073019 .t ?960300076!0 i_ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its .rrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:31:17 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 ■ Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surve ed 9z+o7zu 1 1 96270009M1 r 901121004 _ 9210 J. .�� 962700105 1i '.1072001 II' .,� 962700096 e 982700079 i rr .� r 10 w�9627oo9ae srA ----_, !II' 962700098 i r r . fl 962700097 . ' / Legend 962700078 1162700097,962700097 �. . -} Road System • _.962700113 , .:r 700102 !' O''‘ I 962700112 11 . C Parcels-H ('y962700075 y�rayttt 1 e ShOreknes-Ara �yL 962700110 ' , U74 J C„�, ,Rps, 96270,--- _ l'" ��- _ 962700107 962700108 - care�a,rsacpll�aril 962700077, —� a 1J um WASHINGTON IN "✓ Smran -�-` c--- `. , //8400001 /\\WW1) 001 Cl �' 998400002 �I �f 962700073 ,998400017-x,918400003 .. , . I� Nara C 1984000t6....,,,,,,,-^'-' •� , 980300003 lv .-'` ,---9116400605 11---I f✓ PaarsS9n.osn 998400015 ) _r 960300004 Y 998400008 /1 --I f 962700072 ,9984000t2� 960300005 r- oe,er 921073018 \998400011 O Boundaries — 198400000 W n .teSrem Canty - \\ _. _ ,d '99 n Ober Cartes 962700071 A96030001 1 160300011 921073017 1603000..3' 160300014 960300015 Mats av:rata h'.c+b'-on Gusty Cow,a SQYCrs Gr911 ono•9 9443o(]C' c - 490h FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:32:47 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 J Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed — � ' 72c _000r 962700084 -I 90tt2to04 921072001 962700105 I F / 9a 1 / 1 962700095 ! ; 4- 962700079 Q f 0 .it, _962700090 -- --, d 962700098 - J s�r'ri� 962700096— J rA/•*\\. 1 962700087 962700076 962r0009T7 9627ao,13 j Legend 962700112 1562700,02 RDad System i*96270307s -9627001,1 ff e Pa rce is-H 962700074' l' 962704110 �4o Streams I 9627000, 962700107 962700108 Type9 • Type 5 WAsHin ron ui—` Typs 4 996400001 \� \96030ty • Typs 3 927O0013 988400017 - 960300[.41.' of Trpe2 Y `t l� Typs 1 Ns 998400016+4•� 960300003 \. - 1898400006\�l • Ohs- 01984000. 15 , 960300004 ..1 II----1/ Boundaries 962700072 9964000,2— ' R ,xAfrsanCoon 921073018 99040001, 1 - - 988400008�' , I I CRS Caritas 99&900099,_1 962700071 \. t, , u 4 921073017 9603000+3 960300094, -s. 960300015 Nms:orde7 se_.AW:0'1Caa' Col Scream GY_` 1 1'3., 92 OT34'9 '+ ' - ^l 3_M FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:33:23 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surve ed 901121 ,.... 921072001 ' 0, � .2.'41 . -1 • 1. H rn 962700079 it! _ 962700099. w / d___962700098 ----962700096 962700097 \, 962700078 ,962100097 A962T0004T 962r00tu 9627 0102 / Legend \ , ... •` '' I 962 7001 1 2 n 4 '1,:962700075 I 962700111 Selected Features I d, _1 Road System 9L :. F 962700110 JA" ( f 8,� Parwtc+l 962700107 962700108III . Wetlands 962700077 Boundaries WASHINGTON„\\LN tsmCwt� 9984000p f\, ,y ti 960300091. riatr 962700073 ` 998400017.. 998400000\ 60.00002, Olhw Combos ,. �� 998400016\ .'” 96__0300003 \.\\\..� - 998400006 • 'y X . ..`'R,\998400015_ — .960305004. 962700072 998400412996400007, ' 921073018 \\9984000t . ..r •.998400009'. 962700071 ',\•.96030001 � 9600001.. 6 92107301 ° 030000t3� '.+960300014 ` - V�svu+da7W.k6--Cnrry Car4ral Sav�C85 9110300013 .. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its •rrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:35:55 2005 http://gi s server/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?Servi ceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surve ed 901121004 921072001 921072001 I 962700095 > .6t 1 962700079 .4rf 00099 .10•9627090913 .�v —962700096- 962700097 `962700078 ;9627000974962700097 \ 962700113 t ,,;ti I 962700112. .962700102 Legend Cis 962700075 Selected Features +• r am Road System 1 \ 962700110. Parcels-H „--- \ Sesmlc. 962700077.,\, 9627W907 9627'00108;:x . Boundanes WASHINGTON LN -"win 7 yeaitscri Carty \ 02 960000001 '.ro,. 962700073 ' 968400017.., 998400003 960300002 E] Otter C0.8ro6 Y M8900078f� 998400015 x__----964300004 1`s.% 7990400006 962703072 998400012 998400007 960300006 921073018 \998400011 I 066400008 ui .996400009 962700071 . \ 960900011 I 960300012. 921073017 \\\\ 960300093 x,98060301 V:cr:rvnded br,w+lrs,�n=urr.�Cana Sc'noc GtS --_ - 9tiO3f%%i'1, 46771 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:36:29 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 N. Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surve ed r 962700094 + 901121004 }#2V.F.4.141" 11 962700095 j f■N 962700079 ui 962700099 d—962700098 i--9627000m 962700097 962700078 1627=9627_0097 962700113 \ ', I 962700112 , •, ` Legend `• 062700075 Selected Features I'7'j' i 962700111 T PanRoad�1s-H System I 9`` ' 962700110 _ $T --0‘. 962700107 9627C.,0',:8 FEMA FIRMS 96270077. 1. A c toil _. Ptli _.... \\*,,,6400001! 980300001 ■ x500 --•.998400002 '960300002 atz 9 73 098400017-098400003 room? 1r8.4000t6 �-' - 9603003 ' � X98_400005 LI 998400015 ••n r r Boundaries \ '.Vae \\.`'•' - 996400008 l 962700072 998400012 998400007•:".'', .:� i>rr cores 921073016 \,� 11�,,JI1 g \\\\108400006 W, • 998400009 962700071 1..4 '•...!6030001 1 921073017 '4 960300013 y 960300014�-'.. Macs aadud by Jrbam County Cars Srswes G1S 1.` 06030, 0015 j FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:36:57 2005 http://gisserver/servlettcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed 962700094 1901121004 -'--- ..921I072001 f f,, 1— L.,�/ ta2to7200t 962700095 / F ., y 1- / I/ ' I 962700079 W 962700048 ./ r Wes- s _ r, 962700096 II962 F 7 /962/00018 i '—g827o0081 f 962700113 Legend 9�T00102 Selected Features Q� I 962700112 .�E . _ , ' ''}� 962700171 i Road System T 7F ' 462100110 Parcels-H Critical Aquifer Recharge 96270000 77�� 962700107 linwr 962700108 a Areas I MIASHINC3TON LN -�'' r SU9C-UNK �f9B400001-1 . 960300001 l "� SARPA.SUSC v "A WSC 998400017 99840000; 962709073 �.. r' © S4HPA 'NC 998400016l 1 96030000' / 11 f .']998400006 ` 54rtPA.UNK 948400015 k---, 1960300w-I _ Boundaries .\U' '998480006 y--�-a 948400012 7960300 _.. n .r.,Cn.ry 962700072 921073018 \X00011 I ff—I I I 'wss _ ,996400008 W Ceps Caroms \' 2 998400009 ti „ 962700071 \\ 9603000 1 l� 9603000 A __ 921073017 1 9603W.:' . Maps grandest try.k6asiCooly Cenral Saran CAS - t90772. b '.,_ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:37:26 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed _962700094 �•� 901121004 x_921072001 / ,/ 921o72oo1 } 962700095 / I- 962700079 pzp / �P4 J MI 962700099 r' rt j / 4:7,u1 d 962700098 *rty� --962700096`-- 962700097 ri' \\962700078 ,962700097.—962700047 \�\,'\� 9627007 t3 Legend ti Q,1 9627001_12 /962700102 _ Selected Features �4'962r00075 1 86270071/ • Road System II 1,\ ! 962700110 ! s' I Pa ice ls-H '� �'� 962700107 962700106 '' sIPz 96270ooz7 d] —1J . ._.___\ AA Ran S'Z `WASHINGTON LN ■ bg R sksivz 1\ 1 960300001 ! 7 Coasts SIPZ \ 962700073 996400017' g96400003 980309002 Boundaries 996400016' !7\980300003 .eNrzm Corry \ -7- '998400005 lr-II n ,,.. , 996400015 Jam_ -..,960.300004 Oiler Carnes \V.- v- !gggggO096 I1—� 998400012'9984000w 960300CC5 962700072 921073018 `X11 g ti -. "1 8940000008 w` .996400009': 962700071 �� !00.9000.. L 9603000'25 921073077 \9603000"3: 9603000"4 9.1.44.r0.:oe]3Y m-Corn Carta$syoas GIS .__ '' 9609.XX.'h 46711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:37:57 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 t MaOutput Page 1 of 3 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed .) 96277.7.:72795 rrrr2 a - z 14.1 _ 942/00099 " 9627(70098 c.) 962/0009z. J 952700—.1 , 952/0"2 I 96270002 / 4 ,•Z _962700" VL---jorftsms ° erZ 9627C0108 4? 4NASHINGTON LN / 996400003 99,54000.6 960-30000/. 998.40.70'6 99'MC'fiC4A 0 998400005 ....9eACCPD" W-1 (OD H I IJ j r U r _cc Corr:,Cerra St c aL, 91611CCO:1-\*Alemmomminis4snl http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceNarne=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form--... 11/14/2005 Mak Output Page 2 of 3 Legend 0 Selected Features Road System --- Parcels-Ft — — County Zoning-Active Rung Readarual 1•5 all Rural Randersal 1:10 linui.Randerial 120 all Maury octane 1111 Resarca Barad ha MI Lagra Incarsular . WC IIRt.*VrilkalC4FOF • CrourcarnaGe III CacusruaclaCC III Cramsrasia NC 1. Carnmercas Faun • Rum Faust INarrairang Faros& PP 120 AL 120 v,,0 Rawl EPF R,r.lr- *Wary Resuraian $ Parts sal Remo= Nalrnal Forest Hamm Para Nabxsei Raluga Wars eacias • OAPR•Soula Fauna., 1.1PR-SF Trans . 1,1PR4luilatray • MPR•Fterson Carrie:a • SAPR.Wlaga Crater .......V. IlAPR-Opan Space VAMPR•Runromun IAA.War Dern Ras UGA•krod Ocau Ras UGA144311 Dans Rea UGar U nun 49111filialn4 UGA,Untan Cranrnercaar • UGANasier Ouargla:I Crunnarrerai UGAPularc Pon Torasend URA .a.. ClUstaull Reeierrallan . alra zararn Boundaries Eaallersal Curra4 IIIMeer EOgler Camas FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Forrn—... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 3 of 3 • espect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:38:18 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed .1,. ` iiii Legend 1 3 Selected Features Road System Parcels-H Boundaries yI I .ay rsm Carty I Azar/ n • ntr Camas '�. �.:. A ,I I z::I'l FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:39:03 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=... 11/14/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed 4„ 4r' IX. y J r 1 { y y �3 !y IC 14-s' . - - - li. fir f , 7 i �, Legend , t Selected Features w - -b Road System �� Parcels-H 1 «` • _ 2000 Aerial Photos ..4\e'. +. ,.+46, ,., -4' '* .. Boundaries ' 411101111.11*>*Sr a VV ',Vaes 4. , � * O O!a Carnes 70 I 7.: , . 7 4.!, , _ i M t It ,► r Y , r w FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Mon Nov 14 14:39:32 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/cam.esri,esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=.,. 11/14/2005 ` 33937 . IIW1 Ir;I . S.P.vrx 2 rl leo. T _ NASON SHORT PLAT SP 11-90 A Portion of Gov't Lot 2, Section 7 • SPACE_Si ESA FN1 T•:,' „_ Twp. 29, Rge.IE,W.M. Jefferson Co.. Wash. c"I'rn:- 1 dNr 1- rim=.FE/Fr A+A (Being a Replot of Tracts 87 88, Irondale 7 trana.AL =FA.karr41a1-ow orvni �y r'96'f`' t-4'.“AFa1T ARFA,NO rrerv"-V.; Acre Tracts per Vol.2 of Plats, Page 145 * ' ., ;nub,'f,ALTW R AMON.,OR P111 T441•S CI' � ^` 44s.LL TAKE c'L A'• . Jefferson Co. Wash. i0 pyr LL VICINITY I op .,„„ 4.30,1K MAP e//13/3 OF SEARING (NO SCALE) I la PC' L1� s.DAY•pP� 4/ASN/NG TON CHORD/NATE SYSTEM NORTH 2ONE PER I f TR/ AREA CRP 477 AERIAL MAPP/ND OF /980. AC SO r AS DerefMby£D BY /'?E/13URERKNr$ BETIdEEN THE I _ I//3T OUARTER CORNER AND TfYE MORTHWE3T C0R. l__i NER OF SECTION 7, 7WdN$NIP 29N,RANGE/E.,I✓M AS DEPICTED NCRCON. MRT "'Ow., XPLn7reD R/I✓ [GEVELRND ST / rss•ecrrE ,1 6� MZAWOCR covr //nEANOGT LINE 41(.06 •`K.dr”. watt 88'/7'eT E 7411r—--- - \—��DD.UNI, TRACT J7� Z Y.Or'I - t t ,� y�W� EASEMENT `Ly `t= �:!UE�iti otQ �/x>w s ;',,[pN FOR LOT 1 R \. 5s�AC.E - "/ 1' LOT 2 ti q SEPTIC 3,/0 Rc \ r i �' OA'J AE. col ti1k'�i nREPF f� �• EASE'TIENT t Dy e 1\ © `\4i t L u �' OO I. Iy/ FO 4'n O'NN/a 1Y9 R'GFLefR ■/pas,- /G.iT'N s \\\`�,�2 69MAENr 4S.,yAp '4' _ / Nom'/9"-/0'W / 3.3,- / CKL•O N/•s0'/d'E L.. NAY n'e9'✓_ "� �_. [disc rd.- nwerror _�_ WAY •1__A PORTAGE - E00.00 _ 3 94.Ed NEB' /9' 30-W FD. 4IC-COM: MORN w/COPKR ERR ( 9OI Y r ` MONUMENT/T/ON LEGEND NOTE: .SCHEME CHEME (NO DEAL£) •• SET REBM %L5 '2O4r2 /O 09P SEE SHEET 2 O 2 FIAR sroRM DRAOd9GE RED/REMENTJ. O O•FRO.LS.21445 REAsR'O.P J R V---.. I e 3 FIELD MEAJUREMCA/TS 141/90E 41/7"/w •;i k /"TOTAL 3r4r w INFRARED E.O./1 TRAVERSE U J t AN RADIAL SURVEYL OOS. 4 SW,NW SEC7 ,,, 1 ., CLOSURE MEETS OR EYC£CD5 4 T 3/3 1 ACCURACY STANDARD AS PER A/AC T ; 352-/30-098,PARAGRAPHS IN??N. MO '9 _�A RoRT.001 NAY _h. lmm.,y•3 afj/. Weer 6S/7/ -' labs. AAiTF' TAlP29N,A1YCK,ENy T J66 GREW 2 OF 2 ANN Nor/CE 3, /, %PLATTED Tb A97T_Nn•c PVRCNASERS. d do uo Yy Z..; SCALE I'=6O• / 1@)LJVV 1 auEirar'S fee auditors certificate: A. Der std surveyors certificate 05. .4 filed for record Mls�doy of .41t/L 92L, OI Y[R[n CFIITIFT THAT TMIS WAIT PLAT•Y3ED Ural ;Tt I OSlOEWNS Nres°o.arx.. //A m. in book.t_of pots,d page/J-'/bd the SM1vf,Tsar TNt COORSES MO 013TAYCES AM MOWN • E• v ° •v request of Gtry E Now/ TrEREOY,MO THAT ALL REWIRED STAIRS AYD YGIIYY[Y drawl'Arildis RACED DII THE GIIDUYO. I/. a So :heel/d 2 I nsc ..-�L t T/..,�.. i� 12/21/ info /l►',1 �./ date- 12•26-90 _ Jefferson County Auditor by -T— dep Y "V4:J� ffN svv;s 0 ,33Q:37/ 7/Inv:.V:•ji Bile 1, .PPL211181 • • • N�4SON SHORT FLAT Sim 11 — SO A PORTION Cf GCvEp1EN1 LW:,SECTION 1,TOYNEMP 21 NORIN.ROSE!EAST.WILLA`1E7TE MERIDIAN,JEFFERSON d eery,Itiosv GTON(BElw' ALSO 4 REPLAT Or A PORTION CF TRACTE 51 AND N,1ROIVALE ACRE TRACTS.PER YOdit 2 OF PLATS,P401 145,RECORDS OF AMERSON COINTT WASHINGTON lareanDEXIEMQW FLAT DE'Jr'J]IRI[N All that penes,or Tract N and that portion of Tract 51 lying Sodlwy of IM.folbeag These desb.d IM.'A',M de plat of tamale Aw Tract.pr tl.plat tesel recorded at portion.fl of Tract 41 45,Tract N of keM•M b.Trace,ore plat tng• n and page M5,n Volum 2 of PRY,R.epd.or effendi Lowy,Waea gtet of Governer.*l ne Lot at Pep.MS,Record.,Tun 1p 5 North Cows;SL ellar B..Y19•parent seen-Peed e es oll 1.In Section 1,TCYNip 35 Ngyt IpM.g.11 Ew4ltfllAMli.1"Twldlmt LM A.Segeelg M a pent on the IWYry I.M.of uld Tract 81, said pied being 4.95 a follow rat Northerly of Ow ScuNrtry 000e.of said Tact Sl Vance Twang&SY-101.14 E. •dots..of 40551 fro to the 000r..n Meal.Lire and Times of Nd Line Tit Ce.rdng at the Na1Awt Cone-of Bald S.Glon Y Ores 601'- w YINtey Lines of said Section 1,•Seise.of 2444.43 feet to tl�11�t IA Conner Situate M JMIendi Casty Washington or N1d Section L there N or 15-a5'E•along said Westerly Lints,a dl•tanc.of 3000 fee' tent.&N'-15501E,•distance of 4000 foot to N.SMhawt Corm of said Tract N,and THE POINT CP GEGIwwi-times N o'-k'-45'E, along N.Ewtry Margin of Cleveland Slrof.and YLtry LI NN of Tract N and 51, a dlsarcs 3003 f..4 tilerrce 68O-M'-31'E a defence of 41450 rest to the STORM _A eu Balanced Gov.tn..Meander Linn sec.5.0{'-34'-3l'E.along said Meander Lire, •dl•tave 01 3104 feet;dice N 1Y-15'-155 E a *old Irrewd.Me,.distance All drowse.nee tN roof w reel•of and•tructe-s or steers and devise parting of 53J0Irt.thence N 35'-36'-15'E.a sal y, Hoarder Less,a dines of O AMa,C she.Initr Yard enlaced awn still-Areatwi trgr9y.Sy..11 SttiI.d I ce ewes&N'-rr-3T E-•deters of aid W b 1M Weedy Margin or Portage Way. N.pcyrty ro Clew pen ED I.R hm 154LL The l""' ,.IA,design,and n.NiltIC plan a• ill.RqR el IW y N h4 Mar ed In Nid pot o1 bpdfe 46:6 Tnor a Vence •30•-W' r are to be dfsrnfwy seised and approved by tie Jaffe•di Canty Abut Wore Daputnwt �•W,alwg said toy Marge of said Ft yyy,•dour.of 3[4H feet to the at Ile tee a appllcatio,far•b.ildng peen for cpSNa%yn Of•Pwld.tc.a ry odor of said Pat•e•Way Nd Tao N,M1I. n aid Tract 50.at. long tin or,stay Margin Ca.'ty Plwnwg.rd 5. Calpllar�-.arse W rwRbaaert Hsu be sand by U'r JKler.rn g. y and So+Nely Lama of sae Tra N.a Mem or 53500 Feet For My w[M1•t/Yv. tun I reefed by Ow Pub sr D occupancy weft to N.IRE PONT or CLYanw14a .y.:e.H•0..,,MYlled n vrromwc.With V•.I ltt.d and D.plrl—n that the approved plan Situate in e.rfe•on CMty,WniMinglat exsvW en amiss the L"y caerL__,rs1L. DEGLARATIgy , M smf5 of OwY'reer 1 ty deeid d sr f Ifrw an prow by ten pews Ow 1,N.undwigned,osier it fee , . 'nn Stage.•.the po•.e.or of IY•led NM*d.Ob.d and declare Clore of tee See W siren plat,and tie wsw.nt.depicted lesion ion to be seated by 5y free ell and comet �1 T MAWSER'S CERTphCAWF In Wends Neoof I hereby se fry find this 2Jcyy of 23/0 L 14 MIYsI.m Trwwe or NA'won Cerny Washington.hereby ossify AL all real property lase Are cod It. y to ,..>eA�.A(�/ Wes on w property*awed n tea lave ve been do pto .+,y P-N{.on/� �/E4ls'✓ and neidng Its year 4� pad ACIMMILElaGEMEI lie 111.60n,Screw, -Tr.u,.� St..f WaYwgton d Corny of e.frenm 1 p/n IFS o to certify that m thei,22!' •5 of 9 Qd before..,Se lad.•Iged,a Notary Bello personally appeared 059 P. Nasal,who ratted �sf q tie eels deal/oaten anal a '.otS.g.d lO ne saw re 551.0 and.soled °ui1"'d a^d apaov.d w.=tlNi ere .!/�v./ R// the.Y ea is vOL.nay act and dead Ip RIP saw and rt.pe•r heron ^-zt. recIoned used list re la a.tlplsed to Beans NId*sews t y d't,elt yavY.j(f`- Manse and dIIQYg Deparlas t➢wQaf - nsein ta"d an4 r 1 we N.day and year fast above enters .:: r. �.'-:4' •• `: n -Stu of LLnar.A.rE �I • 7,SSSy W ernglo*.wbWg M9 DYecw Jrlr.ee Cawy VN.a cesewe n epos.. � ..3 NOTICE TO Ppr9.RIAL MCNyEl6 MIA S!LOA CREATED NER E'S SMALL NOT BE MatlER DIVIDED N ANY MANNER weer appov.d tMlIL5. ay Of .B 21 STAN A PERIOD OF FIVE(5)YEMS U?uglf TIE RUNG Cr A PINS.LONG PLAT !J ' >T ! !S Jeffenm /`-Abdo Wale Department Dawes 1.A SEWAGE DISPOSAL firer NV BEEN SEIED FOR LOT 1 WPM PERMIT WIDER VW,TIE SYSTEM MIST BE WALLED CONSISTENT WITS BE MONSON,CF 14445 PERMIT BB PEPPST S VALID FOR ONE TEAR FIWYI NO✓f/nACR (9,1950. A YEARLY RBEWa1 IS PEWIT=FOR A M4Ii1-I1.1 OF TWO Rl YEARS.IPNJN£MRATioI V TIE SEWAGE DISPOSAL r105(5 Is NOT tW ANTEEP AND IS SUBJECT TO RRTIER 4sPID.-4L c.A RENESED IMAM 00x05&APPLICATOR(CONTACT Filed lea moony.at de mouse W DAVID EVAN a ASSOCIATES INC.,tn. 'ME JEFFERSON CaMY HEALTH DEPgPRFNTA 1 day of r1hze/L b at FSees pas w///j/I act r.edid.d it Volts*, of SHOW RATS,Page./A-/(/gbyd.of 3.ANY R8%Y/AL OF,OR MAJOR DIS URBANCE OF SOIL WTHN THE P JfTw•rn Casey WA'w9ton DRAIIFELD AREAS MAY CREATE SITE CONDITIONS TAT APE UNACCEPTABLE eAn FOR'IE INSTALLATION CF SWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM AND COULD NvA,VATE TIE SWAGE DISi O6at FERET. Cyny-44„GlItor 4.NO POTABLE WATER Sapp Y 1E PROVIDED BY MS SNORT PLAT.CRY Y OF PORT TOYNS5JD WATER 15 AVAILABLE ADJACENT 10 TI'S SITE �IF'ul5 3 PCCE.95 On/re AoRTAfof Stiff fER AER/-ffI s 0446 Jeff-son County 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 ate.. a 9 ,'VF^ 41g:4D 1 9 mcam> 1 ,81,;q 1—g aisgg a 4 KZ� yC g .roc.z a — O Z g o $; am3 - yi( (� a0 n l E A 1 g R; ^- --- A a 0 001 A N�F'!4'g1 . . . — m mom 5.#0 X' g °��° jai $sa _ 6 < wt� q f, .x _$ s a o% u . . n O f xx O N 088 Wt 97 I Lot Be I l'o. (NE1/4 12 - 29N - 18) I—LM u�LOI m�Lm m_1 rn).. i CLEVELAND SINEEI 11 I TJO •-a PD In.. 4 m D S I 14,E. al I FA. r 1 'm 2 NI?E DoE 16 t,ss I ohm :&5 No "-1s= G at9-R g " =1 /Rpm i6 a I ��o _�°"°° �AL6 w LOT e D 4i ve. E" r hi as 9 => c NT y I 'rR.crs el: 7 G I g ,9OOON I i S‘ 1 pp N I {BP V c% Tly > Zi O *r F 1 4`CS. I 5 rn �1 e 4y Fs L v f°o So N It d A 3 d O 4a N " 0 Q VP 9 ad9\ �. 1d 14 TT O 9 ' I \ Cvm AxO PT ay�po (I) m p.,,,4 2 N f) ma N (NE1/4 7 - 29N - 1E) o 0 Z Fri Z N N A �v j 7 1 A 'Ul m -o n ° 33 a a 7 a Nn _, N \ a z om m Z J P.- road Page 1 of 1 ROAD LOG INFORMATION FOR PORTAGE WAY ROAD NUMBER:C575609 ROAD NAME:PORTAGE WAY CROSSROAD NUMBER:C940407 CROSSROAD:OAK BAY RD. CROSSROAD MILE POST:1.41 CROSSROAD LEFT OR RIGHT: L ROAD LENGTH:0.39 GRID ROAD STARTS: F-1-D MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS SEARCH ROAD SEARCH CREATION DATE SEARCH http://isserver/Address/RoadDetail.asp?ROAD NUMBER=C575609 11/18/2005 Map Output Page 1 of 1 962700108 - SPAAD - Features Not Surveyed 962700097 962700097 _.�96270009T ,F iiiiiib k _ 962/C01'3 962700.72 9627001021 9627W?1• 962700170 A. Jf ��.&,. Legend t.______ ? Selected Features t5 Road System " Parcels H 962700107 4 0 Boundaries 7IX' r-8, Water Service Areas __ �_� _ o F"fe ■ Pr.Cvr ri.NA ...__......_._..._�__-,, Ja Pr.Frwse,NA ri / \ ip `�, 96030000! 996400001 f � O� `` `` \. '� 960300002 ... / 998400003 `1 *. +, 9964000'6 ' 1! \ 4 ' . 96D300003 \` .l 996400004 \ \ r' '.. ! --"'r^i'• , 9984000'5 ,f 99640aW5 99640W'4 ..I 960300004 'A41400043 . \Ian rcn dlll n crc &,r..USt.Ce-r a]C'f,:es r4 C. i+11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 18 09:23:50 2005 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceN ame=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.0&Form=... 11/18/2005 Page 2 of 2 usage and increased amounts of surface water runoff that may increase the risk of flooding and change the salinity of the wetland and thus plant communities and the associated wildlife will be impacted. In addition, the loss of a safe corridor for wildlife to move from area to area, this is especially important in areas where development has made upland travel routes unavailable, discontinuous, or life endangering. Much of the landward side of the estuary has single-family homes and a roadway aligns the shoreline. WDFW has identified marine/estuarine shorelines as a priority habitat in part due to comparatively high density and diversity of wildlife species, important wildlife seasonal ranges, limited availability, high vulnerability to habitat alternation and dependent species (WDFW 2004). Of the 331 terrestrial wildlife species known to inhabit King County, Washington, 263 wildlife species (are known or expected to have associations with marine riparian habitats including 9 amphibian species; 5 reptile species; 193 bird species; and 45 mammal species (Brennan and Culverwell 2004 attached). Since Jefferson County also lies within the Puget Sound lowland, the wildlife species are similar to those in King County. Just in the short time I was at the site, I observed Great-blue heron, migrating waterfowl and evidence of raccoon and river otter usage of the site. The WDFW priority and species map show waterfowl and shorebird concentrations using the estuary. In addition,juvenile salmonids migrating from the nearby fish bearing stream likely use the estuary for feeding and rearing when they emerge from the stream. In addition, recent research on estuaries show that juveniles salmonids from other areas will feed and rear in estuaries along their mitigation route to the ocean. WDFW recommends subject property acquired by the local land trust and preserved as open space and we are willing to look for funding. However, if the owner is unwilling to allow acquisition of the property as open space, WDFW understands the difficulty in denying use of the property to protect a critical area even when it is among the remaining functioning Category 1 wetlands connected to Puget Sound. WDFW recommends the smallest development that will allow reasonable use for subject property be permitted and thus hopefully result in a larger buffer than the proposed 50 feet. An example would be a very small dwelling such a cabin or placement of a small park model manufactured home onsite. In addition, non-native vegetation in the buffer should be removed and native plants should be planted and maintained to ensure survival. The native plant species should be selected based a nearby relatively undisturbed reference site with similar physical attributes to the subject property. In addition to minimizing the building envelop, other measures such as requiring the residence to be designed such that interior lights will be directed away from the wetland, routing all new, untreated runoff away from the wetland, establishing covenants to limit the use of pesticides and fertilizers within 150 feet of the wetland, retrofitting stormwater detention and treatment for road and driveways, preventing channeled flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer, and require the planting of dense native (i.e. Nooka rose)hedge to delineate the wetland buffer edge. 12/19/2005 PRE05-00049 Post Meeting Update Nason SPAAD Attendees: Barbara Blowers, Agent; Linda Atkins, EH; Stacie Hoskins, DRD; Terry Duff, DPW; Zoe Ann Niswonger, DRD Friday, November 18, 2005 10:00 am Agent: Barbara Blowers Owner: Fred and Dona Nason P. 0. Box 1668 61 Portage Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9735 Phone: 360-385-6860 Description of Proposal: SPAAD - Parcel 962-700-108 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - LAND USE • Zoned - RR 1:5 • Parking (UDC Section 6.10) - Two parking spaces are required for each residence. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: • Shoreline Designation - Conservancy; Show OHWM and 30 ft. setback on site plan. • Stream - Mapped Type 3 Stream; Dixie Llewelyn will address in her wetland delineation report. If the stream exists it requires a 100 ft buffer plus 5 ft. bldg. setback from buffer; Type 1 stream along shoreline (not applicable unless code changes) • Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Waterfowl Concentrations, Saltwater Wetlands, Shorebirds (Two Agency Packets Required at Application - DCD will send to WDFW & DOE), Habitat Management Plan required; • Wetland - Wetland delineation and habitat management plan required at time of application - The report should address the project as a whole (septic, stormwater, buildings, revegetation, etc.); • Flood Zone - Flood elevation certificate (not required for SPAAD approval, but is required for development) • Seismic Hazard • Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ) - Coastal; • Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area; Bulk & Dimensional Standards • Building Height: 35' maximum • Maximum Lot coverage: 25% • Minimum 20 ft. setback from Portage Way right-of-way • Minimum 5 ft. side setback • Shoreline setback - The standard setback for residential structures, including common appurtenant structures such as garages and workshops, shall be thirty (30) feet or one (1) foot for each foot of bank height, whichever is greater. This setback shall be measured from the bank's edge when the bank's height exceeds 10 feet. When the bank's height is less than 10 feet, the setback shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark. The setback shall not exceed 100 feet. Application & Fees: • Two (2) Agency Packets required at time of SPAAD application. Each agency packet shall include: copy of Master Permit Application, copy of site plan, Metskers Map with project location highlighted or site location map, copy of Assessor's Map with parcel highlighted, copy of habitat management plan. • Master Permit Application, Site Plan, Water Availability Notification, Wetland delineation and habitat management plan, Road Approach Application, soil logs prepared by a licensed septic designer or professional engineer. C:\Documents and Settings\Barbara\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK53\PRE05-00049 - Nason - Nov 18 2005.doc Page 1 of 2 • Fees: $196.00 for DRD review, $147.00 for RAP, $212.00 for Environmental Health. Total Fees Due at application: $555.00. If applying for a septic permit at time of SPAAD application, fees are $436.00 for Septic Permit, $196 for DRD, $147.00 for RAP. Total Fees due $779.00. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT (Linda Atkins - phone: 360-385-9444): • Soil Logs prepared by a licensed septic designer or profession engineer. • Each residence requires a minimum of 240 gpd septic capacity. Consequently, 2-one bedroom homes and 1 satellite bedroom (no kitchen facilities) would require a minimum 600 gpd (5 bedrooms). PUBLIC WORKS (Terry Duff - phone: 360-385-9160): • A Road Approach Permit is required for access off of Portage Way. • The address may be applied for at the same time as the road approach. C:\Documents and Settings\Barbara\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK53\PRE05-00049 - Nason - Nov 18 2005.doc Page 2 of 2 Page 1ot2 Barbara Blowers From: Paul Keegan [pauLkeegan @drstrong.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:11 PM To: Barbara Blowers Subject: RE: Nason Soil logs The next time I'm in Port Townsend I am coming to your office and I am going sit down at your computer and give that thing an update No problem. I'll just copy it to this page. SOIL LOG DESCRIPTIONS D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approx. Site Address: Oak Bay Client: Nason Soil Texture Type: V Date Soils Logged: 12.8.05 Soils Logged By: DRJ Soil Log# 1 0 - 10 " Top Soil 10 -. 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 36" Soil Log# 2 0 - 2 " Top Soil 2 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 36 - 42 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand 42 - 76 " Brown Silty Medium Sand w/Gravel Water at 76" Roots to 42" Soil Log# 3 0 - 7 " Top Soil 7 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 36 - 67 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Water at 67" Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 rage 2 oT 2 Soil Log # 4 0 - 10 " Top Soil 10 - 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Water at 72" Roots to 24" Soil Log # 5 0 - 8 " Top Soil 8 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 36 - 66 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 Page 1 of 2 Barbara Blowers From: Paul Keegan [paul.keegan @drstrong.com) Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:11 PM To: Barbara Blowers Subject: RE: Nason Soil logs The next time I'm in Port Townsend I am coming to your office and I am going sit down at your computer and give that thing an update No problem. I'll just copy it to this page. SOIL LOG DESCRIPTIONS D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers, Inc. Approx. Site Address: Oak Bay Client: Nason Soil Texture Type: V Date Soils Logged: 12.8.05 Soils Logged By: DRJ Soil Log# 1 0 - 10 " Top Soil 10 -. 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 36" Soil Log# 2 0 - 2 " Top Soil 2 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/Mottling 36 - 42 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand 42 - 76 " Brown Silty Medium Sand w/Gravel Water at 76" Roots to 42" Soil Log # 3 0 - 7 " Top Soil 7 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 36 - 67 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Water at 67" Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 ?age tot 2 Soil Log# 4 0 - 10 " Top Soil 10 - 35 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 35 - 78 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Water at 72" Roots to 24" Soil Log# 5 0 - 8 " Top Soil 8 - 36 " Grey Brown Sandy Silt w/ Mottling 36 - 66 " Grey Compact Loamy Sand Roots to 24" 12/20/2005 ... — ; --_i• . 4.....5, ; 1 ft :,-,....,•11pv...-0- • - • • -.0 . ,,..- ,:. 0-,-- o'' 01111t,'3i . ft- 0..Av,,, .,‘,',, i.• 14' ‘.. s- 1' g; 9 g --■••_-_,...-4•4 .,,rit.,..alo..4 -L —-- -,;.4 - N.7•,e," I (I' -711 8 r■-■ r . ,.......,,,64.6,..00 , „,, at. .?..* , . ,.• " "—i ---..--- ri : m 0 m - a rr-,> ?-4 fTI vi -4 2. -I n. ..:, -441.• ...:. Kg r ° x co . , ....I:..., „,,,,k, ••• ., , , , ' rec:•.......::-1.. • . •"'i,/, \ I A :.•.. ..... . > * • RIlial " 11 ' - Z I :,g',4 . .. • ''' ' ' t, '",e, -'41. '+'' . --r- a 1 . ../-...• 4-, - eii■-• i..;.::; . ;-'' • c ' ilp I, :../ .,..' -4 2 0 il Z -4 Now P • ). . .... .r s - -... . 4, .. , .. ... . . . • , ::.: ,,:,..."- - aill& _ger,r.!"... .. ..-- 0 . • - it' et 14 , ' P. iffy. . , ,. . ,r di - ' '' --. • : : ..:Ar 0-133•C'-i•'--"' (AV ' '■' jr 1'7-';ti. 41 ;. c.-:.:- . '- . ,/.. ".' •'A' ...f Air 13 -.• 4 4f SO& - • -be _.. /a alb ra..., oh. 3, •.. • ' go; . ,••- •i 4.1: a) It. ,..-• ,At, . -.• .0 - IT ? b**,..s .-- ' - • ... 1 1 x z 0 z :i ! 7:421.t,*4•,.4.. ,,.,..:. .,„0. , ....41 ,.i .., -... i t I v , :, ....„ ....a. ..i v... 'kyr ■•,,, 4 9 ■• r.1 '-{ . ",.'-1 ' .:....1... MININCW, t•.,,t .//*.. ...441. • i..V.:: 6- '•x.// • ; iIP ''. ; . . ..1 .'. ..1 : . . .. . 4!. '41 9 Ye' ..'! :11 !' re 44. , :44 I. Svp",0 e,, 4� °� RUNTY ti �� o MUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECE VED nsend • Washington 98368 �`S-`lINOO t 360/379-4451 Fax NOV 11 2005 Pre-Applic e JEFFERSON COUNTY OCO V- en • The Jefferson Cour (--■6- JDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project apps proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non housand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The cunsuaauon includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. NAME: !' 1 C G! //./k 4( rl ^ MAILING ADDRESS: ei 1/(1-t / TELEPHONE: (HOME) ,/� /' (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: �er Q/ �o�,.��L / (/�/fauier_s /�-. {/ MAILING ADDRESS: ��'G // 11P 0 r ! ' \ �i a TELEPHONE: (HOME) 3 rJ _ O 10 (WORK) DIRECTIONS 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; d. Means of ingress and egress; e. Property/lot drainage; f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; g. Location of utility easements; and h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.1010192001 Page 1 Property Description /. /1fff��,��A General Location: / � G()L Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): 2 6 0 i o Total Acreage: Zone: %Lot Coverage: Applicant: Owner El Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description 4;44ii. c (A)f l<ite t Property Owner(name and mailing address): f -P1 /14 S Lin Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only uring regular business hours. ( IGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate dC( b r r C (d We(S to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. X\ (LP:NDONMER SIGNATURE) // 1 (DATE) PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.10108/2001 Page 2 f CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 962700108 Printed: November 14, 2005 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner PRE05-00049 BLOWERS Application Received: 11/14/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SPAAD No findings, conditions,or permissions found. SEP94-00153 NASON C Application Received: 4/27/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/24/1994 Case Finaled: 1.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT #1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 2.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given. 3.) Curtain Drain required a minimum of 10' upgradient of primary and reserve drainfields. 4.) 30 ft. setback downslope of mound area to be maintained to protect infiltrative surface. 5.) Dry season installation required. 6.) Low use water fixtures required, 1.6 gal. flush toilets and 2.5 gpm shower heads. 7.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers are required around drainfield. 8.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 9.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 10.) Divert all sources of drainage away from septic tank and drainfield area. 11.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 12.) Asphaultic emulsion or equivalent required on septic tank and/or pump chamber. 13.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of a building permit on this site. ..gel G Gam/7( Page 1 of 1 , Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 962700108 03/10/2005 Owner Mailing Address: FRED P NASON DONA 0 NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 Site Address: Section: 7 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: NW1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 211 Planning area: Tri-Area (4) Sub Division: NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC 1 LOT 2 1 1 1 �130 zQ http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=962700108++++++++++... 11/14/2005 ' Map Output Page 1 of 3 Features Not Surveyed ._962700098 / 962700096_—1 962700097 ( '4 796210004, / , I , gee.?3Q%_:: 9603 l' 99a.toaae9 �''� 1, gviwcx,aoa 9984CY}:}'S -998400 cos I , E:ESnax, 4 _ 9603000CM l 99e4 998n00006 ,______2 `.I.i,. cr_U s._chr:.mCwr.�.:er.a ScvcGr."9fiO3(xx:+.'S 0� '21911 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=Tru... 11/14/2 00 , r CC C) H 0 = O Q LL N O Z LL \ O H Co o) H -7 O •- O .. .. Ni- \ O C) 4- a) - CU O ') Z O -o — co ¢ o o L J O x CY -0 •1•' CO C U 0 = I- LL1 O O Z -i--. -0 H 0) 0) ¢ •• 7 .0 _C _C U f- ¢ -0 U U U ¢ Z 0 7 0 J O- O_ = U I- I- O O 0) Lf) a) CD CV) CO -o IL = O D) U I O O O) LU U C = 3 co a I-- ¢ CO - O CO 0 UD CO J U 0 CO -O ¢ CO Z 0) C = - 1-1 -- 3 3 } CU ¢ I- I- CO 3 17 CC O <C LL CO C W CV J J LL >- W O- N- 0- CO CC <C Co O a ¢ 0 Z Z 3 Y •• CC I- X O O O C-) CO 0. N CC O <C <C Cl) Cl) LLl O 0) O LL I- ¢ <C CO J 0 J CV 2 CC LU Z Z <C C) = <C C/) LL L-- I- ¢ U LL 'O X LU d O CC 2 CC U Z CU ^ h- CU J O O Z CO 0- 0 ¢ 0- I- o CO F- O CA CO M w Z O 0 <C O U) 7 0- O CC O O CO Z J ¢ -I--, U LL C) CD d Z CO - +1 0 CO O U7 9 O O O O CO O I- O CV CO CO <C CO 0) Z CD O CU O O CV O O O -o L •- I"- O U CU CV CO 7) it C O O a) •• L B L CO Y C - C) O ++ CU ¢ a) CU 7) CO -- I) Z L CO 0 CO C1) 'O > CO U L L [7 - 0 <D d L U CO X -I U -o x o CO a CO .- -- <D a) I- H X U) CO 4- i I • • a _.J b UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#PREO5-00049 Review Type Project Description PRE05-00049 SPAAD Applicant: BARBARA BLOWERS Site Address: PO BOX 1668 PORTAGE WAY PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 PORT HADLOCK WA,98339 owN FRED P NASON DONA 0 NASON 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 Project Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108,Nason Short Plat .83 Ac,lot 2, Section 7,Township 29,Range 01 East,WM, located on Portage Way,Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Parcel Number: 962700108 S-T-R:7-29N-01E Total Acreage: 1 Legal Description NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC LOT 2 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 4 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690190B District: 49 Zoning: RR1:5 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPR:, WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES ISO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YE t o Shoreline Desl atio -YE,', NO zrAf • Stream Typt -`..�j l i 3 (f Fish&Wildlif-0 0 ..�-ee!;u - -=.f�- ' 1 I•`"r' 'D Wetlands: t`O Rare Plants:Y Seismic: � 0 Landslide: Q Flood: 0 Erosion: YESO Aquifer Recharge Area:® NO SUS SIPZ: none At Risk HighRisk oastal Stormwater site plan su mitted: Yes [ ] Forest Lands: YES IO Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ lnholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES NO [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES NO [ ] Stormwater:New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Disclosure: Airport YES NO MRL, YES NO Forest Lands YES NO [ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No [ ] Parking Spaces Rd-d NO i 2 Other [ ] Building Height: ( UBC Standar [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC:10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [ ] Road Classification: �� Road Approach:EXISTING T REQ'D l°" � [ ] SEPA Required:YES MPT [ ] Flood Certificate: [ ] Existing Case(s) &Condition(s): Violations: Yes No „ iv [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN 10•y Over Syrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat o i . . .' . ce Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES N , submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES NO [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval YES NO [ ] ADMIN.: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES INo parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 962700108 PRE05-00049 P SPAAD SEP94-00153 C 5/24/1994 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET FRED P NASON MLA05-00737 Date Time Comments 1Z 131 I(11 ( i'h 2,24)is .fieA 'ALW a /(L > I ii_ i / 1:1R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt December 21,2005 IImre t UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW ' Project Planne . Master#MLA05-00737 Review Type Project Description Z ' J_a f/n' ZON05-00059 Sight Plan Advance Determination Primary: FRED P NASON Site Address: DONA O NASON a( PORTAGE WAY 61 PORTAGE WAY PORT HADLOCK WA,98339 PORT HADLOCK WA 983399735 Project Location: Parcel Number 962 700 108,Nason Short Plat .83 Ac,Lot 2, Section 7, Township 29, Range 01 East,WM, Located on Portage Way,Port Hadlock,WA 98339 Parcel Number: 962700108 S-T-R:7-29N-01E Total Acreage: j , F3 Legal Description NASON SHORT PLAT .83AC LOT 2 Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 4 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: 5300690190B District: 49 ZoninC COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area PUD: [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO [ ] ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YESNO Shoreline Desi nation:YES NO Stream Type No 'r 3 5b-u---C Q)i J'e 4e e.L. imileW) Fish &Wildlife:O NO _"rCJ i`. v 13yov D#.bb[�(.4./i1;(-e4/1- ,/i;-evl C, "+UJDrIA 1 z Z Z4 v-0 Wetlands: 10 o IVNP t�c.bw-4. ed ,Q � g1 31(0 I ' Rare Plants:YESS� (ENO Seismic:Landslide: YESIC s' StkoJAI-t. .CetteSyitva Flood: O F6o /6. eg l2,eyd Erosion: YES() 0 Aquifer Recharge Area o 5.V.54—SIPZ: none At 't s. High Risk oast Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES Adjoining Forest Lands: Conunercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ ] Mineral Lands: YES [ ] Agricultural Lands: YES [ ] Stormwater:New Imoerv.onc Snrfare r a r,:....._ . - . .-..-.-- ESA's _ 1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notil ) Forest Lands vEs CO [ ] Pane r� p� � [ ] Park__.___..__._ � _,__. [ ] Builc [ ] Impe---.-° P is F X\` (//s/O81 + /�� trial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 F ---- [[( / t� Iustrial Lands only [ l Total .47 7 f �fT .tic8waterconstr aims/Nonespec'ied RVC f i / S'( - .• V [ ] Setlx Rear: Shor Q ' LSH � pag5k- / � » [ l Road-.__. f y i cr , [� `, Road 4/llS O U p [ l SEEV _ ' [ ] Flooc [ ] Existi Viola [ ] Recot Over 5yrs=UDC Plat t Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance Lots/1 4: YES NO [ ] Site [ ] Requi_ _ [ ] ADM New 1 Speci No parcel to i Associated CASES status issued finaled description • 962700108 MLA05-00737 ZON05 00059 P Sight Plan Advance Determination PRE05-00049 M 11/29/2005 SPAAD RAP05 00313 P ROAD APPROACH AND 911 -PORTAGE WAY SEP94-00153 C 5/24/1994 septic system to serve this lot is located on lot 1 of short plat, #962700107